{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01206896551724138, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.4860335195530725, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of larval diet on adult immune function is contingent upon selection history and host sex in Drosophila melanogaster

Mounting an immune response requires a considerable energy investment by the host. This makes expression of immune phenotypes susceptible to changes in availability of resources. There is ample evidence in scientific literature to suggest that hosts become more vulnerable to infection by pathogens and parasites when access to nutrition is limited. Using populations of Drosophila melanogaster experimentally evolved to better survive bacterial infections, we explore if host selection history influences host response to resource deprivation in terms of immune function. We find that when reared on a suboptimal diet (both in larval and adult stages), adult flies from evolved populations are still more immune to infections compared to flies from control populations. Furthermore, we observe a sex-dependent effect of interaction between selection history and diet on immune function. We thus conclude that immune function of hosts adapted to pathogen challenge is less affected by resource limitation compared to non-adapted hosts.