{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018170019467878003, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009085009733939001, 'mean_word_length': 5.070866141732283, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Perception of organ grafts by internists].

INTRODUCTION
At the time when organ transplantation occupies a preponderant place in the treatment of many pathologies, the role of the internist in the care of grafted patients remains confidential and poorly defined.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
A questionnaire was sent to 730 internist practitioners. The aims of this questionnaire were to evaluate 1) their level of knowledge and practice of transplantation; 2) their declared interest on the subject; and finally 3) their perception of the theoretical place of the internists in the transplantation.


RESULTS
Two hundred twenty-five answered. Although nearly 80% of the practitioners who answered this investigation declared themselves interested in the subject of transplantation, more than 60% considered their theoretical and practical knowledge on the subject to be insufficient. Nearly 70% said they felt ill at ease when faced with a grafted patient in consultation. Nearly two experts out of three considered that the role of the internist in the follow-up of grafted patients should be reinforced but less than 50% of them wished to be more involved, directly and personally.


DISCUSSION
Whereas grafted patients frequently suffer from polypathologies that could be treated in internal medicine, a majority of internists do not wish to be directly implicated and/or do not feel qualified to treat these patients. The inherent risk in this is to see this specialty gradually excluded from the care networks available to grafted patients.