{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05656565656565657, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022222222222222223, 'mean_word_length': 5.526315789473684, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Canadian in the End?

In a post-Survival (1972) update in 1985, Margaret Atwood announced to an audience at Princeton, `yes, Virginia, there is a Canadian Literature' (Atwood, `After Survival,' 135). Yet, another fourteen years later, what constitutes `Canadian' is still a dominant critical question. Geographically and demographically speaking, there have always been very good reasons for Margaret Atwood to conclude, as she does elsewhere, that `Canadian' is a kind of overdetermined nebula: