{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020414993306559572, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011378848728246318, 'mean_word_length': 5.2531380753138075, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Identification of stratigraphic traps with subtle seismic amplitude effects in Miocene channel/levee sand systems, NE Gulf of Mexico

Abstract Stratigraphic traps created and preserved on the unconfined slope of the ancestral Mississippi submarine fan in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico have been found to contain substantial and profitable hydrocarbon reserves. Nearly 2 trillion cubic feet of gas (350 million barrels of oil equivalent) have been produced in the last 13 years in less than 1400 feet (425 m) of water. Drilling results have yielded 31 fields from 45 drilled prospects for a success rate of 69%. The main phase of exploration lasted eight years. The first 3D survey in 1994 sparked a major increase in drilling and success rates until the last field was discovered in 2001. This play has now essentially been exhausted of sizeable opportunities. The underlying Mesozoic section sources hydrocarbons to the play for middle Miocene slope sands. The unconfined (non mini-basin) slope sands are turbidites and debris flows that were deposited between 5 and 25 miles (8 and 40 km) from their coeval shelf margins. Stratigraphic traps in this environment are created at the margins of the levees as they interfinger with slope shales. Additional geometric modifications of the stratigraphic traps result from post-depositional erosion or ‘cannibalization’. The erosion left ‘monadnocks’, or remnant patches of porous sands, that are encased in low permeability shales. Turbidite channel/levee deposits are the dominant reservoir facies in these ‘patches’; however, they may consist of channel, levee, or debris flow facies. Detailed mapping of these dominantly gas charged erosional remnants shows little to no fit of seismic amplitude effects to structure and the hydrocarbon accumulations often appear as amplitude anomalies ‘floating in space’. This work was done to provide an analogue study, as well as to document any remaining prospects that were initially overlooked. Almost every discovery and dry hole in the trend was interpreted and included in this study. Integrating the well control into the geological model by using detailed seismic stratigraphy, whole core description, dipmeter logs, seismic to well tie synthetics, Gassmann fluid substitution and AvO analysis, provided the necessary insight to prosecute this play. Within the play area, seismic velocities of sands and shales are very similar. As a consequence of this, seismic reflections are generally weak and, due to the stratigraphic variability, they are discontinuous. Hence, standard sequence stratigraphic mapping techniques alone are not enough to define these subtle traps. The key to successful exploration is a complete understanding of the rock properties. All of the fields examined displayed subtle amplitude anomalies associated with the presence of hydrocarbons. The ability to understand and quantify both the amplitude is essential to increasing the probability of success in this play.