{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014329580348004094, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008188331627430911, 'mean_word_length': 5.744827586206896, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Prosthodontic Philosophy of Smile V/S Visual Perception of the Beholder- A Correlation

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the smile photographically using parameters and to assess the parameters using model and also to correlate the smile with the visual perception of the beholder. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 10 subjects from the institution and we categorised into 2 groupsaccording to Gender. Photographs were taken and diagnostic models was made for assessment of the Smile. Questionnaire was prepared and distributed to 2 groups20 Dentists and 20 Prosthodontist RESULTS: Results indicate that both dentist and prosthodontist rated overall smile differently, and statistically significant difference were found among dentist and prosthodontist. CONCLUSION: Different parameters have an impact on the Smile Perception. In this study compared to Dentist subjective perceptions, Prosthodontic philosophies have played an important role in significant smile perception.