{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016835016835016835, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00808080808080808, 'mean_word_length': 5.296610169491525, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Certain problems of crimes qualification related to abuse and excess of authority

The work indicates that the Russian Federation is improving the norms of criminal legislation aimed at countering acts that infringe on public relations, ensuring the interests of the state, public service and service in local government bodies. However, the analyzed offences – abuse of authority (article 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and excess of authority (article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) contain such effects as a significant violation of rights and legitimate interests of citizens, organizations or legally protected interests of society or the state, which emphasizes their public danger. While analyzing these compositions of acts, we indicate both general and distinctive features. It is emphasized that the problem of their differentiation is expressed, first, in the fact that their technical and legal design is based on evaluation features, and second, on the basis of the existing distinctive features, the same act in different cases is qualified differently – under article 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation or under article 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. We divine that in matters of the types of crimes qualification under consideration, it is of paramount importance to establish the limits of authority, the motive for committing the crime, as well as the connection with official activities.