{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0326530612244898, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013605442176870748, 'mean_word_length': 4.935483870967742, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Can truncal vagotomy still be justified?].

The aim of the study was to determine the severeness of the postvagotomy side-effects in patients who underwent truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty in emergency situations because of perforation or haemorrhage of a gastro-duodenal ulcer. Fullness (21%) and diarrhoea (17%) were found to be the most important side-effects. Although there were 31% of Visick Grades 3 and 4.86% of the patients were content with their general condition after the operation. None were disabled in their social or working life. It is concluded that because of the well tolerated side-effects truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty may still be performed in case of emergency-complications of the gastro-duodenal ulcer.