{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012738853503184714, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004246284501061571, 'mean_word_length': 5.594405594405594, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The measurement of socioeconomic inequality and social class in Australia: a review of past practices and recent developments.

Recent findings have pointed to an association between socioeconomic status and health in Australia but have, in the process, raised important questions about the validity of various methods of determining a respondent's location within the hierarchy. While some of the problems associated with the use of the Australian Bureau of Statistics classification were known, the full extent of these deficiencies was not. This paper reviews past and present methods of measuring socioeconomic inequality in Australia. After pointing to the criteria which should be applied to determine the adequacy of any method of socioeconomic classification, the paper reviews the main strengths and weaknesses of the methods of classification used in health‐related research in Australia. 1988 Public Health Association of Australia