{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02470862470862471, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006526806526806527, 'mean_word_length': 5.293255131964809, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The two-dimensional structure of low strain rate counterflow nonpremixed-methane flames in normal and microgravity

The structure and extinction of low strain rate nonpremixed methane–air flames was studied numerically and experimentally. A time-dependent axisymmetric two-dimensional (2D) model considering buoyancy effects and radiative heat transfer was developed to capture the structure and extinction limits of normal gravity (1-g) and zero gravity (0-g) flames. For comparison with the 2D modelling results, a one-dimensional (1D) flamelet computation using a previously developed numerical code was exercised to provide information on the 0-g flames. A 3-step global reaction mechanism was used in both the 1D and 2D computations to predict the measured extinction limit and flame temperature. Photographic images of flames undergoing the process of extinction were compared with model calculations. The axisymmetric numerical model was validated by comparing flame shapes, temperature profiles, and extinction limits with experiments and with the 1D computational results. The 2D computations yielded insight into the extinction mode and flame structure. A specific maximum heat release rate was introduced to quantify the local flame strength and to elucidate the extinction mechanism. The contribution by each term in the energy equation to the heat release rate was evaluated to investigate the multi-dimensional structure and radiative extinction of the 1-g flames. Two combustion regimes depending on the extinction mode were identified. Lateral heat loss effects and multi-dimensional flame and flow structure were also found. At low strain rates in 1-g flames (‘regime A’), the flame is extinguished from the weak outer edge of the flame, which is attributed to a multi-dimensional flame structure and flow field. At high strain rates, (‘regime B’), the flame extinction initiates near the flame centreline owing to an increased diluent concentration in the reaction zone, similar to the extinction mode of 1D flames. These two extinction modes can be clearly explained by consideration of the specific maximum heat release rate.