{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028051554207733132, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006823351023502654, 'mean_word_length': 5.769230769230769, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Screening methods using sulfamethazine for determining acetylator phenotype

Analysis of sulfamethazine (SMZ) kinetics in man has revealed complexities including wide intersubject variability. In our study, an attempt was made to assess the potential influence of changes in nonmetabolic parameters (absorption and urinary elimination rate constants) on the markers of acetylation capacity normally used in clinical screening procedures to determine phenotype. Seven normal subjects were classified as slow (SA) or fast acetylators (FA) according to their metabolic rate constant for SMZ (Km), plasma SMZ half‐life, and percentage of N‐acetyl SMZ in a 6‐hr blood sample (PI6), a 5‐ to 6‐hr urine collection (UI6), or a 6‐hr total urine collection (UI6). Computer simulations were applied to baseline SMZ kinetic data from these subjects, varying nonmetabolic kinetic parameters over experimentally defined ranges singly, or in parallel with 1 or more of the other parameters. The simulations indicate that all the usual phenotyping procedures were sensitive to changes in absorption and urinary elimination rate constants. While these predictions require experimental confirmation, results show that the PI6 method is least sensitive to such changes, suggesting this method may minimize errors in phenotyping screening.