{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01749271137026239, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0058309037900874635, 'mean_word_length': 4.773109243697479, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
From Pomponius to Article 6:212 Dutch Civil Code - The Vicissitudes of a Tradition

Tradition is a volatile phenomenon in law as in literature. Legal scholars have claimed the existence of a tradition concerning unjustified enrichment as a source of obligations. Has this alleged tradition influenced the provisions in the Dutch civil code on unjustified enrichment? The answer must be ambiguous. History, as such, is not a convincing source of inspiration for modernizing civil law. But as one of the workers on this part of the Dutch code I cannot deny a certain psychological effect of this tradition, even if invented. Such inventions make fascinating reading and stick to the mind.