{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027146464646464648, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01452020202020202, 'mean_word_length': 5.19140625, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Theophylline for Spinal Cord Injury Associated Bradycardia.

BACKGROUND
Spinal cord injury (SCI) related bradycardia occurs frequently in patients with high cervical spine injuries. In patients with SCI-related symptomatic bradycardia, a variety of agents have been used to improve heart rate and reduce the need for vasopressor therapy. The literature concerning the use of theophylline in this disease state is sparse.


OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and describe the use of theophylline for SCI-related symptomatic bradycardia.


METHODS
This was a retrospective case series of patients with SCI-related symptomatic bradycardia who were treated with theophylline. Patients were evaluated based on clinical response to theophylline. Patients were classified as a responder if vasopressors were discontinued or the number of bradycardia episodes decreased following the initiation of theophylline.


RESULTS
A total of twenty-six patients were included in the study. 17 (65.4%) patients were classified as responders, 5 (19.2%) patients were classified as non-responders, and 4 (15.4%) of patients were classified as undetermined. 11 patients (43.31%) were discharged on theophylline with 7 of these patients (41.2%) classified as responders. There were no significant differences between those classified as responders and those who were not.


CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
This case series suggest that theophylline could be used as adjunctive therapy in patients with bradycardia secondary to acute SCI who achieve an adequate response to theophylline.