{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014697876973326075, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.909774436090226, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Characteristics and Limitations of Local Government Educational Welfare Baseline from the Perspective of Lifelong Education

This study attempts to analyze the educational welfare baseline strategic projects of local governments from the perspective of lifelong education to clarify their characteristics and limitations, and to suggest the direction of setting the educational welfare baseline at the local level. In order to achieve the research purpose, an analysis frame according to the educational welfare level and an analysis frame according to the principle of lifelong education were devised, focusing on the deductive qualitative method of Elo and Kyngas, but the content analysis was conducted on the local government's educational welfare baseline strategy project. As a result of analysis based on education welfare, the educational welfare standards of ten local governments show projects at the input stage, financial shortage support projects, projects led by provincial governors (mayors), not superintendents, and projects for school-age students. As a result of the analysis according to the principles of lifelong education, the degree of correspondence to the principles of scalability, innovation, and integration of the educational welfare baseline strategic projects of the three local governments differed significantly depending on the region. In particular, since the educational welfare standard of local governments was set from a social security perspective, the principle of lifelong education was not sufficiently reflected. In the future, the expansion of educational content and form in the educational welfare baseline strategy project, innovation into practical useful learning and mutual educational relationships, and integration of educational resources and learning stages should be considered. 
