{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02224199288256228, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0035587188612099642, 'mean_word_length': 5.617647058823529, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Deciding how clean is clean enough under the Texas Law of risk-based corrective action

Under the Texas Risk Reduction Program (TRRP), the principles of risk-based corrective action (RBCA) are applied when determining the appropriate cleanup standards for contaminated sites. RBCA is premised upon the belief that scarce resources are better allocated on other necessities when the budgets for corrective action merely provide for negligible or marginal benefits. Therefore, RBCA seeks to establish cleanup levels based on the actual risk to human and environmental health. Although a valiant undertaking, such regulations are relatively new and may not provide adequate protection for the environment, current landowners, and/or subsequent purchasers. Limitations associated with RBCA include the various uncertainties and complexities inherent with all risk assessment paradigms, as well as the potential for conflicts with regulatory laws. Understanding RBCA, as applied in TRPP, may be important in resolving future liability issues, especially those associated with toxic tort litigation. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.