{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033023735810113516, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03199174406604747, 'mean_word_length': 5.217948717948718, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evidence from the Low-Temperature Specific Heat for d-Ware Pairing Symmetry in Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4

Recently, possible evidence from the low-temperature specific heat (LTSH) for the lines of nodes in the superconducting order parameter of cuprate superconductors has attracted much attention and is still a controversial issue. To clarify this issue, N-type Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4 has been investigated by means of X-ray diffraction, electrical resistivity, magnetic-susceptibility and LTSH measurements. X-ray diffraction pattern shows that the sample contains a single T′ phase, and the superconducting transition temperature Tcm taken with the onset of diamagnetism in magnetic-susceptibility measurement is nearly 20 K. The data shows clear evidence for an αT2 term at zero magnetic field in LTSH of Pr1.85Ce0.15CuO4, and is consistent with d-wave superconductivity. Furthermore, this result is discussed and compared with those results observed in LTSH of La1.78Sr0.22CuO4.