{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03889585947302384, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005018820577164366, 'mean_word_length': 5.435483870967742, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Compensated-beacon adaptive optics using least-squares phase reconstruction.

In this paper, we quantify the benefits of compensated-beacon adaptive optics (CBAO) relative to uncompensated-beacon adaptive optics (UBAO) using wave-optics simulations. Throughout, we present results for both the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SH-WFS) and the digital-holographic wavefront sensor (DH-WFS). Given weak to moderately strong scintillation conditions, the results show that the two noiseless sensors offer similar performance in terms of the peak Strehl ratio when using similar subaperture sampling and least-squares phase reconstruction. Specifically, CBAO leads to an average performance boost of 17% for the SH-WFS and 26% for the DH-WFS relative to UBAO for the turbulence scenarios studied here.