{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020891364902506964, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.336734693877551, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cross‐validation of magnetic resonance elastography and ultrasound‐based transient elastography: A preliminary phantom study

To cross‐validate two recent noninvasive elastographic techniques, ultrasound‐based transient elastography (UTE) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). As potential alternatives to liver biopsy, UTE and MRE are undergoing clinical investigations for liver fibrosis diagnosis and liver disease management around the world. These two techniques use tissue stiffness as a marker for disease state and it is important to do a cross‐validation study of both elastographic techniques to determine the consistency with which the two techniques can measure the mechanical properties of materials.