{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04216867469879518, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0321285140562249, 'mean_word_length': 4.870588235294117, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Scale matters in understanding the complexity of Amazon fires: A response to the Editor

Berenguer et al. (2020) (hereafter B2020) raised issues on the spatio-temporal details of our analysis of Amazon fires (Xu, Jia, Zhang, Riley, & Xue, 2020). We respond to their points below, most of which either misrepresent our analysis or are tangential to our paper. Further, B2020 ignored our major conclusion regarding the vulnerability of Amazon forests in the context of the large-scale coupled system.