{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02264808362369338, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01916376306620209, 'mean_word_length': 5.144385026737968, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[The role of repeated transurethral resection in the treatment of bladder tumor]

Complete removal of the tumour or deep invasion can be proven by repeated transurethral resection of bladder wall at the previous tumour site. Six weeks after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURB), in all but TaG1 cases repeated resection were performed for the evaluation of radicality in 62 patients, 43 males and 19 females, suffering bladder cancer, from October 1998. In the case of positive histology another resection was performed for security reason. In the case of 38 superficial (Tis, Ta, T1) cancers, repeated resection revealed negative, identical or different T stage compared with previous histology in 28, 5 and 5 cases, respectively. In 7 cases repeated resection was applied as second intervention after the incomplete resection of large tumour mass. Indication of repeated resection was insufficient depth of resection and carcinoma in situ in 13 and 4 cases, respectively. Based on our data, we conclude that repeated resection should be performed when tumour-free status is not justified and biopsy according to Bressel was not taken.