{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024925224327018942, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009970089730807577, 'mean_word_length': 5.159509202453988, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Conflict in corpora


 The analysis of conflict in family discourse has often been characterised by ethnographic approaches and/or fine-grained analysis
 of unique conflict episodes. This article, by contrast, uses a c.175,000-word spoken corpus of Irish family discourse, in
 conjunction with a corpus pragmatic approach, to explore specific linguistic aspects of conflict discourse. Conflict episodes are
 identified and analysed in the corpus using a range of linguistic “hooks” (Rühlemann
 2010) that have been previously associated with prefacing disagreement such as the marker well,
 mitigators (I think, I mean, I guess) or the counterargument strategy yes but. The analysis
 reveals that the family members most frequently use the yeah but strategy in conflict episodes which facilitates
 immediate disagreement. This strategy is often accompanied by a range of mitigators, predominantly in turn final position, some of
 which have not been previously identified as indexing conflict sequences.