{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02756183745583039, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0303886925795053, 'mean_word_length': 5.025531914893617, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Fluence Rate‐Dependent Photobleaching of Intratumorally Administered Pc 4 Does not Predict Tumor Growth Delay

We examined effects of fluence rate on the photobleaching of the photosensitizer Pc 4 during photodynamic therapy (PDT) and the relationship between photobleaching and tumor response to PDT. BALB/c mice with intradermal EMT6 tumors were given 0.03 mg kg−1 Pc 4 by intratumor injection and irradiated at 667 nm with an irradiance of 50 or 150 mW cm−2 to a fluence of 100 J cm−2. While no cures were attained, significant tumor growth delay was demonstrated at both irradiances compared with drug‐only controls. There was no significant difference in tumor responses to these two irradiances (P = 0.857). Fluorescence spectroscopy was used to monitor the bleaching of Pc 4 during irradiation, with more rapid bleaching with respect to fluence shown at the higher irradiance. No significant correlation was found between fluorescence photobleaching and tumor regrowth for the data interpreted as a whole. Within each treatment group, weak associations between photobleaching and outcome were observed. In the 50 mW cm−2 group, enhanced photobleaching was associated with prolonged growth delay (P = 0.188), while at 150 mW cm−2 this trend was reversed (P = 0.308). Thus, it appears that Pc 4 photobleaching is not a strong predictor of individual tumor response to Pc 4‐PDT under these treatment conditions.