{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018145161290322582, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.417910447761194, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Aligning Consumers Around Low-carbon Competitiveness : Evidence from an Online Experiment

This study identifies which affective and cognitive factors influence consumers’ behavioral change with regard to environmental decisions. It hypothesizes that eliciting incidental guilt is more effective in changing consumer behavior than eliciting incidental shame. Results suggest that consumers’ environmental decisions may be misattributed, and informed by an individual’s incidental emotional state.