{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025150905432595575, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0030181086519114686, 'mean_word_length': 5.503267973856209, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Black Officer in a Buffalo Soldier Regiment: The Military Career of Charles Young (review)

296 examine the collusion—whether intended or not—between southern judicial systems and the nation’s highest court. The book is strongest in its focus on Marshall, Mollison, and Cashman; unfortunately, they appear far too seldom to become compelling figures in the fight for legal equity. While Waldrep ends the book with homage to Cashman and his newspaper, he fails to let readers know what happened to marshall. In fact, while Supreme Court justices, cabinet members, and congressional leaders drive the narrative, the grassroots-level activity promised in the book title is largely absent. Despite these shortcomings, Jury Discrimination does provide a thorough examination of the often-contentious relationship between reality and constitutional principles, between state action and federal authority, and of the racial disparity that in some measure still exists within the American legal system.