{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01652892561983471, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0025429116338207248, 'mean_word_length': 4.962121212121212, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cardiac MRI unmasks presumed embolic MI due to Patent Foramen Ovale Case Report


 
 
 Occurrence of paradoxical coronary embolism is reported in up to 10-15% of all myocardial infarctions but embolic infarctions presumed to be as a result of a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO) are rare. Although rare, it is important to identify these patients as they need appropriate investigations to confirm their diagnosis and guide further treatment.
 
 
 
 We present the case of a gentleman with troponin positive chest pain with non-obstructed coronaries on invasive coronary angiogram. Subsequent Cardiac MRI demonstrated multi-focal myocardial infarctions in several coronary artery territories. Further investigations including echocardiogram were performed in order to identify a cause and source of the embolic infarctions and led to the diagnosis of patent foramen ovale. The patient was treated as myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) most likely due to embolic phenomena in the presence of a PFO.
 
 
 
 Multiple focal infarctions in multiple coronary artery territories should raise the suspicion of an intra-cardiac shunt. Multi-modality imaging with cardiac MRI and echocardiogram is important in correctly identifying any source of emboli and the diagnosis of any intra-cardiac shunt. Whilst PFO closure is a possible treatment for patients, considerations regarding risk stratification and local provisions needs to be taken into account. Patients should be referred to the appropriate subspecialist to ensure suitable long-term Follow-up.
