{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0084985835694051, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.891666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Transformations between signed and classical clause logic

In the last years two automated reasoning techniques for clause normal form arose in which the use of labels are prominently featured: signed logic and annotated logic programming, which can be embedded into the first. The underlying basic idea is to generalise the classical notion of a literal by adorning an atomic formula with a sign or label which in general consists of a possibly ordered set of truth values. In this paper we relate signed logic and classical logic more closely than before by defining two new transformations between them. As a byproduct we obtain a number of new complexity results and proof procedures for signed logics.