{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05598866052445074, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011339475549255847, 'mean_word_length': 5.99009900990099, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative Studies on DNA-Binding Mechanisms between Enantiomers of a Polypyridyl Ruthenium(II) Complex.

A pair of ruthenium(II) complex enantiomers, Δ- and Λ-[Ru(bpy)2MBIP]2+ (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, MBIP = 2-(3-bromophenyl)imidazo[5,6-f]phenanthroline), were designed, synthesized, and characterized. Comparative studies between the enantiomers on their binding behaviors to calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) were conducted using UV-visible, fluorescence, and circular dichroism spectroscopies, viscosity measurements, isothermal titration calorimetry, a photocleavage experiment, and molecular simulation. The experimental results indicated that both the enantiomers spontaneously bound to CT-DNA through intercalation stabilized by the van der Waals force or the hydrogen bond and driven by enthalpy and that Δ-[Ru(bpy)2MBIP]2+ intercalated into DNA more deeply than Λ-[Ru(bpy)2MBIP]2+ did and exhibited a better DNA photocleavage ability. Molecular simulation further indicated that Δ-[Ru(bpy)2MBIP]2+ more preferentially intercalated between the base pairs of CT-DNA to the major groove, and Λ-[Ru(bpy)2MBIP]2+ more favorably intercalated to the minor groove. These research findings should be very helpful to the understanding of the stereoselectivity mechanism of DNA-bindings of metal complexes, and be useful for the design of novel metal-complex-based antitumor drugs with higher efficacy and lower toxicity.