{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02717391304347826, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0018115942028985507, 'mean_word_length': 5.207865168539326, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Using a qualitative and quantitative validation methodology to evaluate a drone detection system

Drones are gradually becoming commodities. This is a positive evolution, as these tools have many positive uses, and the affordability of the current systems means that new business opportunities arise. However, we cannot also be blind to the negative aspects that these novel tools may induce into our society. Indeed, next to the many airspace infringements, where uneducated hobbyists inadvertently enter potentially dangerous airspace (e.g. near airports, manned aviation), we also see an increasing use of drone technology by criminals [1], [2]. Most countries have now established rules for access to airspace by unmanned aerial vehicles/drones/Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPASs). The challenge is now to enforce these rules, as law enforcers lack the means to automatically detect airspace infringements. Indeed, something like a car traffic speed camera for the air does not really exist yet, but it seems to be an essential tool if one wants to ensure safe airspace operations for everyone.