{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024495677233429394, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.556603773584905, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Women with pure stress urinary incontinence symptoms assessed by the initial standard evaluation including measurement of post‐void residual volume and a stress test: Are urodynamic studies still needed?

The significance of preoperative urodynamic studies in women with a “clinically‐defined pure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptom” has been debated in recent years. We evaluated changes of reliability of pure SUI symptoms for prediction of pure urodynamic SUI (USUI) when the assessment of post‐void residual (PVR) volume and a stress test, designated as the initial standard evaluation in the NICE and AUA guidelines, were added to the process for the diagnosis of pure SUI symptoms.