{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026554856743535988, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002795248078266946, 'mean_word_length': 5.336283185840708, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cochlear implantation in patients with canal wall down mastoidectomy cavities

Abstract Background: Safe cochlear implantation (CI) is challenging in patients with a canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy cavity. Objectives: We reviewed the outcomes of CI and proposed surgical management principles according to the presentation status of CWD mastoidectomy cavity. Material and methods: The cases of eight patients (nine ears) with CWD mastoidectomy cavity who underwent CI were retrospectively reviewed. The basis of the surgical decision, postoperative complications, and postimplant auditory performance were analysed. Results: In seven patients (eight ears), implantation was performed in a single stage; in six ears, the external auditory canal (EAC) was oversewn. In two patients with ossification, the electrode array was inserted into the scala tympani by drilling of the basal turn or in the second turn of the cochlea through a drill-out procedure. Seven patients had a follow-up of 12–50 months and one patient was lost to follow-up. None of the followed-up seven patients suffered complications. Conclusions: CI is safe and effective in patients with profound hearing loss after radical mastoidectomy. In patients with CWD mastoidectomy cavity, CI does not cause a higher rate of postoperative complications relative to standard CI procedures. The outcome is excellent and comparable to that in the general CI population.