{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01646090534979424, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.822429906542056, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Radical Enlightenment

That Sulloway also recognises that Schiller and Schopenhauer provided vital conceptual inspiration for Freud is indicative of the importance of literary and philosophical motifs as conceptual inspirations for biologists. Biology—itself a synthetic and by no means uncontroversial term in the later nineteenthcentury—was a rich source for other branches of inquiry, because it had itself borrowed extensively from many other areas of literature, philosophy, history and the social sciences. Instead of a process of the scientizing of Freudian psycho-analysis, one might see the reverse, that biology was more historical, social and philosophical than is customarily appreciated by historians of science.