{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034858387799564274, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006535947712418301, 'mean_word_length': 4.476190476190476, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
From the authors

We thank N.H. Chavannes and T.R.J. Schermer for their interest in our recent article [1]. The letter is an important contribution to the ongoing discussion on spirometry testing in primary care for the diagnosis and management of chronic lung diseases [2]. The study by SCHERMER et al. [3] found that spirometry testing in the primary care setting was of comparable quality to spirometry testing in a hospital-based lung function laboratory.