{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04166347553036685, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014628168798345715, 'mean_word_length': 4.237866024869635, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Two-point String Amplitudes Revisited by Operator Formalism

So far we have considered that a two-point string amplitude vanishes due to the infinite volume of residual gauge symmetry. However recently Erbin-Maldacena-Skliros have suggested that the two-point amplitude can have non-zero value, because one can cancel the infinite volume by the infinity coming from on-shell energy conservation. They derived the two-point function by Fadeev-Popov method. In this paper we revisit this two-point string amplitude in the operator formalism. We find the mostly BRST exact operator which yields non-zero two-point amplitudes.


Introduction
It has been shown that two-point tree level string amplitudes in flat space are given by the free particle expression in conventional quantum field theory [1]. In open string theory, a two-point string amplitude in tree level can be evaluated by a correlation function of two vertex operators inserted in the real axis of the upper-half plane. The automorphism of the upper-half plane, PSL(2, R), is partially fixed by the two points, but the gauge volume of the residual symmetry becomes infinity. Usually, the resulting two-point amplitude was argued to vanish due to the infinite volume. However, in Ref. [1], it is pointed out that this infinity cancels δ(0) arising from the energy conservation of the amplitude in the path integral formulation, so that the standard free particle expression is given for the two string amplitudes.
The tree two-point amplitude has been usually thought to vanish also in the covariant operator formalism based on the BRST symmetry, while it provides a fascinating approach to evaluating string amplitudes. In this formalism, an n-point tree-level open string amplitude (n ≥ 3) is constructed by n ghost operator insertions attached to the vertex operators and n − 3 anti-ghost operator insertions associated to the integration on moduli space [2]. Applying this rule to the two-point amplitude, the ghost number gained by the vertex operators is two, which is lesser than the number of the ghost zero modes. Thus the two-point amplitude does not vanish only if another operator of ghost number one is inserted.
In order to reproduce non-vanishing two-point amplitudes in the operator formalism, it is necessary to find a new type of vertex operators supplying an additional ghost number in the amplitude. Moreover, δ(0) given by the energy conservation should disappear owing to this novel vertex operator.
The energy conservation factor δ(0) is expressed as where 0 | is the SL(2, R) invariant vacuum and | p 0 is an energy eigenstate. This delta function provides δ(0) due to the momentum conservation, p 1 = p 2 . Here we introduce the eigenstate | x 0 of the zero mode of the world-sheet field X 0 and we replace 0 | by 0 | ≡ x 0 = 0 |. Then the energy conservation δ(0) changes to a finite value: The operator corresponding to |0 is given by Hence, there is a possibility that the two-point string amplitudes is provided in the operator formalism, if this operator can be rewritten as a BRST invariant operator with the ghost number one.
The purpose of this paper is to derive such an operator and then to show that the two-point string amplitudes can be calculated also within the operator formalism. We also discuss the the Lorentz and conformal invariance and some applications. We introduce the following operator made of the 0-th string coordinate X 0 (z,z) and the ghost field c(z): where the position z is along the real axis.
One can easily check that V 0 (z) is a BRST invariant operator. Moreover, the operator can be rewritten as where Q B is the BRST operator. This implies that V 0 (z) is a mostly BRST exact operator. However, the integrand is ill-defined at q = 0 since it is given as 0/0. Therefore, the integrand is expected to behave like a distribution supported at q = 0. 1 Here we consider the correlation function including V 0 : where all z i are on the real axis and the two vertex operators are given as V i (z) = cV i (z) (i = 1, 2) for the matter vertex V i (z) with conformal weight one, the momentum p i µ (µ = 0, · · · , D − 1) and the mass m i . By the energy-momentum conservation, the correlation function is expressed as where the on-shell condition is satisfied: and so q is replaced by a non-zero value after the q-integration. In this case, since the integrand of V 0 is a BRST exact operator for q = 0, the correlation function turns out to be zero.
In the case of m 1 2 = m 2 2 , the delta function for the energy conservation becomes δ(q).
Therefore, taking out of the contribution of q = 0 after the q-integration, the correlation function (2.3) can be rewritten as where the prime means that it does not include the delta function of the energy conservation, which vanishes due to the q-integration. This expression is equal to the two-point string amplitude derived by using the Fadeev Popov method in Ref. [1]. Consequently, we can find that the correlation function provides the standard free particle expression of the two-point amplitude: where p 0 = p 1 0 = p 2 0 . If the mass eigenstates are degenerate, there is an extra Kronecker delta for the orthonormal basis.
Here we should give some comments. The first term appeared in the right hand side of Eq. (2.1) plays an essential role to give a non-zero result of the correlation function. Actually, the operator V 0 (z) is written as and the first term is exactly equal to the expression given in Ref. [1]; the delta function related to the gauge fixing condition X 0 = 0 and the associated Fadeev-Popov determinant. The second term is also indispensable for realization of correct two-point amplitudes. If the second term is absent, the BRST exactness for q = 0 is not be assured and so two-point amplitudes would have non-zero values even in the different mass case. The right-hand side of Eq. (2.6) is the standard inner product for on-shell states in quantum field theories. In Ref. [2], it is pointed out that this standard one is not correctly given by the conventional inner products in which the ghost zero mode c 0 is inserted. Instead, a reduced inner product is defined by ignoring X 0 and ghost zero modes to provide the inner product for on-shell states [2]. We emphasize that the standard inner product for on-shell states is given by a correlation function (2.3), in which the inner product is conventional including c 0 insertion.
By state-operator correspondence, the vertex operator V 0 (z) corresponds to the state | V 0 = V 0 (0)| 0 . This state satisfies the subsidiary condition Q B | V 0 = 0 [5,6], but does not satisfy the additional condition b 0 | V 0 = 0 [5], since the second term in the right hand side of Eq. (2.1) corresponds to a state proportional to c 0 . Therefore, V 0 (z) is not an on-shell state and so outside the conventional Hilbert space of physical states.

Lorentz and conformal invariances
The operator (2.1) is a novel vertex operator to provide the two-point amplitude in the operator formalism. However, this expression (2.1) breaks the Lorentz invariance since it picks up the time direction as special. First, we will discuss why the Lorentz invariant amplitude (2.6) is obtained by using the Lorentz non-invariant operator (2.1).
Let us consider the infinitesimal Lorentz transformation: where ǫ µν is an anti-symmetric infinitesimal parameter. For the infinitesimal transformation, the variation of the operator (2.1) is expressed as The important point here is that the factor 1/q does not appear in contrast to the expression (2.2). Since the integrand in the above has no singularity for any q, the infinitesimal variation is given by a BRST exact operator. Therefore, by finite Lorentz transformations, the operator V 0 is transformed as (2.10) The BRST exact term does not contribute to the correlation function for physical operators. Consequently, the amplitude satisfies Lorentz invariance, although the operator (2.1) is apparently breaks Lorentz invariance.
In the same manner, we find conformal invariance of the amplitude although V 0 is not a conformal invariant operator. For an infinitesimal conformal transformation δz = ǫ(z), the operator V 0 (z) is transformed to Similar to Eq. (2.9), the integrand includes no poles of q and so the infinitesimal variation is given as a well-defined BRST exact operator. Therefore, the amplitude is provided as a conformal invariant quantity as well as the case of the Lorentz invariance.

Closed strings
Let us straightforwardly apply the open string V 0 to a closed string one, where Q B is the BRST operator, Q B = Q B +Q B . The factor 2 is due to the left and right movers of closed string. This is also a mostly BRST exact operator like the open string V 0 defined by Eq. (2.1). However, it is not straightforward to apply the correlation function of open strings (2.5) to the one of closed strings. For the two vertex operators V i (i = 1, 2) with conformal weight (1, 1), one may easily guess the correlation function on a sphere as 0 | V 0 (z 0 ,z 0 ) ccV 1 (z 1 ,z 1 ) ccV 2 (z 2 ,z 2 ) | 0 in a standard manner, where | 0 is the SL(2, C) invariant vacuum. However it vanishes, because its total ghost number is five, which mismatches to six, the number of zero modes on the sphere. In order for the ghost number matching, we try the following assignment of ghosts: (2.13) Note that V 1 is also BRST invariant. Then the closed string amplitude, becomes the two-point amplitude of the standard free particles. Indeed we calculate the amplitude (2.14) in the equal-mass case, 12 . Its anti-holomorphic part is canceled by the ghost correlation c(z 0 )c(z 1 )c(z 2 ) , while its holomorphic part is canceled by −c∂c(z 1 )c(z 2 ) . This is one of the reasons why we attach the ghost fields c∂c to the vertex operator V 1 . It is also possible to assign the anti-ghost fieldsc∂c to the vertex operator as V 1 = c(−c∂c)V 1 and V 2 = ccV 2 . However these ghost assignments cause a problem, that is, (−c∂c)c or c(−c∂c) are not annihilated by b 0 −b 0 . Such annihilation is necessary for a physical closed string vertex operator [7][8][9]. Even if we take a liner combination of these assignments, the annihilated condition is satisfied but the resulting amplitude becomes vanishing. All in all, currently the naive application of the open string to the closed string is not successful.

Concluding remarks
We have studied the two-point string amplitude in the covariant operator formalism. For open strings we have found the mostly BRST exact operator V 0 which yields the non-zero two-point amplitude. Although the operator V 0 itself violates Lorentz and conformal invariances, the two-point amplitude recovers them.
For open strings we have obtained the two-point amplitude like a standard free particles (2.6), which is the same amplitudes that Ref. [1] derived by the use of Fadeev-Popov method. In our formalism the amplitude is given by the correlation function of V 0 and two vertex operators V i with the ghost field c. On the other hand, for closed strings, we have introduced the mostly BRST exact operator V 0 in the same way as open strings, but the correlation function of V 0 and the two vertex operators V i with the ghost fields cc does not make sense for lack of the total ghost number of this correlation function. Therefore, we have tried to assign the ghost fields (−c∂c)c on one of the vertex operators V i and cc on the other. This provides us with the non-zero two-point closed string amplitude (2.15), but there appears the problem, i.e., (−c∂c)c or c(−c∂c) are not annihilated by b 0 −b 0 . Since the simple application of the open string amplitude for the closed string one does not work, we have to find a prescription for the closed string case.
The mostly BRST exact operator V 0 plays a significant role in our formulation. In particular, the BRST quantization of strings is valuable for formulating string field theories.
Following our formulation, it can be straightforward to consider the two-point amplitude of open superstrings. On the other hand, for closed superstrings, we may be confronted with a difficulty similar to the closed bosonic strings [10].
It should be commented that the insertion of V 0 is expected to implement a special choice of gauge fixing of the dilatation subgroup SL(2, R). Actually, V 0 is a BRST invariant extension of the operator given by the Fadeev-Popov method in Ref. [1], as pointed out in the section 2.1. So, it is expected to be possible to compute arbitrary tree-level n-point amplitudes by inserting V 0 . For example, a three-point amplitude may be obtained by a correlator of V 0 , V i (i = 1, 2) at specific points, which fix SL(2, R), and dz 3 V 3 (z 3 ), where V 3 is a matter vertex operator with dimension one. Although the q-integration in V 0 eliminates the energy-conserving delta function, the moduli integration of z 3 may supply another energy-conserving delta function to lead the correct three-point amplitude. We will provide the details of this study in the near future [10].