{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014319809069212411, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00477326968973747, 'mean_word_length': 5.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
After Muidrock sentencing for standard non-parole period offences in NSW

In the 12 months since the High Court's decision in Muldrockv The Queen overturned R v Way, the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal has considered the impact of Muidrock in a considerable number of decisions. The following article highlights three of the most significant influences on sentencing practice in NSW arising from the High Court's decision.