{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03883886574385163, 'fraction_numerical': 0.039645208977288, 'mean_word_length': 4.846032992930087, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Genetic characterization of an H2N2 influenza virus isolated from a muskrat in Western Siberia

Thirty-two muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) were captured for surveillance of avian influenza virus in wild waterfowl and mammals near Lake Chany, Western Siberia, Russia. A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2) was isolated from an apparently healthy muskrat using chicken embryos. Based on phylogenetic analysis, the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase genes of this isolate were classified into the Eurasian avian-like influenza virus clade and closely related to low pathogenic avian influenza viruses (LPAIVs) isolated from wild water birds in Italy and Sweden, respectively. Other internal genes were also closely related to LPAIVs isolated from Eurasian wild water birds. Results suggest that interspecies transmission of LPAIVs from wild water birds to semiaquatic mammals occurs, facilitating the spread and evolution of LPAIVs in wetland areas of Western Siberia.

number of residential backyards adjacent to wetlands providing habitat for semiaquatic mammals make this region a perfect location for the spread and evolution of AIVs [3]. During this study conducted in August-September 2014, thirty-two muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) were captured for our investigation of AIV at the Lake Chany region (Western Siberia, Russia). Here, we report an isolation of H2N2 influenza virus from a muskrat and the biological properties of this isolate.
Of the thirty-two captured muskrats during our study, no animals presented any clinical signs of disease. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected and tested for AIV with the help of real-time PCR using previously published primers and probes that targeted the matrix (M) gene [26,29]. Using this methodology, one sample tested positive for AIV. This sample was inoculated into 10-dayold embryonated chicken eggs. Allantoic fluid was collected 3 days post-infection (dpi) and frozen at −80°C for further use. The virus identified as A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2) was passed to 10-day-old chicken embryos and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells to determine the viral titer as previously described [8]. The full-length virus genome of the isolate was sequenced using MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Phylogenetic analysis of all viral genes was made by the maximum-likelihood method with a bootstrap test (1,000 replications) using MEGA v6.0 software.
A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2) from the allantoic cavities was 64 HA units (HAU) per 50 µl and 10 7.0 50% egg infectious dose (EID 50 ) per ml. The virus did not cause the death of the chicken embryos. We also evaluated the virus replication in MDCK cells. Most influenza A viruses can replicate well on MDCK cells in the presence of trypsin. However, some avian strains poorly replicate and do not form plaques on MDCK cells without prior adaptation [32]. The virus could replicate with high titers of 32 HAU and 10 8.0 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID 50 ) per ml at 4 dpi.
To discuss the pathogenicity of A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2), amino acid (aa) analysis of the viral proteins was performed. We found that A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2), as well as similar avian H2 viruses, possess as QGG-motif in receptor-biding site (226-228) of the HA protein (H3-numbering). This motif is known to be predominant for binding of HA molecule with α 2, 3-NeuAcGal receptors expressed on avian cells [21]. The aa analysis of PB2 showed that A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2) possessed avian-type 627E and 701D, whereas most mammalian isolates had 627K and 701N in the PB2 protein [25]. In terms of PB1-F2, we found 66N whereas 66S has been reported as a virulence marker of H5N1 highly pathogenic AIVs [27]. On the other hand, several amino acids conferring higher pathogenicity in rodents were detected in A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2). We found 89V, 309D, 339K, 477G, 495V and 676T in PB2, demonstrating potentially increased polymerase activity in mice [14]. In addition, full-length PA-X protein, a virulence marker of H1N1, H5N1 and H9N2 viruses with severe inflammatory responses in mice [5,6], was also identified in A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2). Moreover, some potential pathogenic markers were found in M1 (30D and 215A) [4] and NS1 (103F and 106M) [9,10,28] in this isolate. Taken together, it is hardly to summarize the pathogenicity of A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2) based on the aa analysis, because the pathogenicity of AIVs in rodents may be associated with a certain combination of several factors and depend on the fitness of the virus replication in each host. A further study on the ecology and pathogenicity of AIVs including H2 subtype in wild mammals is essential in Siberia, since the AIVs of H4N6 and H13N6 subtypes have already been identified from muskrats at the Lake Baikal, Russia in 2000 [2,15,16].
Along with H1 and H3, influenza viruses of H2 subtype are important concerning humans. H1 and H3 viruses are currently endemic in humans; therefore, attention has shifted to a possible recurrence of the H2 subtype due to its absence in humans for more than 50 years. The influenza H2N2 virus is known, because of the 1957 Asian flu pandemic. It originated from the wild bird influenza H2N2 virus and the human H1N1 virus, but the exact origin of the previous pandemic H2N2 virus observed in 1958 is unknown. There is little evidence that it adapted to the human population by passing through a mammalian intermediate host [12]. Since 1968, influenza H2N2 viruses have not been detected in humans; therefore, most individuals younger than 50 years lack humoral immunity to the H2 antigen [19]. Although there are no influenza H2N2 viruses in the human population at the moment, H2 influenza viruses are often isolated from wild birds and poultry [18]. The H2 influenza viruses in wild bird populations have been detected in combination with all nine NA subtypes. The AIV of the H2N3 subtype was also isolated from swine and the environment [1,17,20]. Therefore, it is of great interest to conduct studies on the interspecies transmission of H2 influenza viruses between avian and mammalians, because they have a high degree of genetic and antigenic similarity to the ancestral viruses that contributed genes to the 1957 H2N2 pandemic virus.
A great risk for interspecies transmission exists in the habitats of wild birds. Surveillance studies for AIVs in mammalian populations that come in close contact with wild waterfowl are crucial for monitoring virus evolution, its adaptation to novel species, and the development of appropriate diagnostic and treatment methods. The isolate from this study currently presents no evidence of virulence for humans or poultry; thus, it may be a muskrat-adapted virus or a transient virus in the nasal cavity of muskrats. Thus, in our opinion, muskrat could serve as a new reservoir of AIVs, posing a potential risk to other animals in the food chain, including humans. analyzed by the maximum-likelihood (ML) method using MEGA v6.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net/). Horizontal distances are proportional to the minimum number of nucleotide differences required to join nodes and sequences. Numbers at each node indicate the probability of confidence level in a bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replications. A/muskrat/Russia/63/2014 (H2N2), which was isolated from a wild muskrat in present study, is highlighted using bold lozenge.