{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012033694344163659, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0048134777376654635, 'mean_word_length': 5.656, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Absenteeism Data as a Measure of Cost Effectiveness of Stress Management Programs

Stress in the workplace has been labeled the leading contributor to health-related problems in the United States, with costs to businesses and industry estimated to exceed $I00 billion a year. 1 To a great extent these costs have encouraged a movement toward prevention and alleviation of stressrelated diseases. As a consequence, numerous health promotion entrepreneurs have developed and successfully marketed a variety of stress reduction programs to businesses and industries throughout the country? Oftentimes, however, these enterprising health promotion marketeers release premature estimates about the potential benefits of the programs they market based on data which do not provide a suitable basis for their conclusions and ascertions. 3