{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0401249116191374, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022036295074239924, 'mean_word_length': 4.924258289703316, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 6, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 8, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Levels of brain natriuretic peptide are associated with peripheral arterial disease in subjects with type-2 diabetes mellitus

Background The effects of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) on the risk of cardiovascular disease and atherosclerosis have been studied. However, little information is available regarding peripheral arterial disease (PAD), particularly among subjects with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of our study was to assess the potential relationship between BNP levels and PAD among T2DM patients. Methods The study cohort was 507 T2DM outpatients in which BNP levels were measured. Cross-sectional associations between BNP levels (in tertiles) and PAD were examined. Results Compared withT2DM patients without PAD, BNP levels were markedly higher in patients with PAD (p = 0.001). Correlation analyses showed that the BNP level was negatively correlated with the ankle–brachial index (r = −0.453, p = 0.033). At a cutoff value of 78.2 pg/ml, the BNP level showed a sensitivity of 71.9%, a specificity of 68.1%, and a positive predictive value of 84.3% for a diagnosis of PAD. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve increased significantly if BNP levels were incorporated into a predictive model of the potential risk factors for PAD (0.85 vs 0.81, p = 0.029). Conclusions BNP is a potential and promising biomarker for PAD screening in T2DM patients.


Background
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a subclinical measure of atherosclerotic vascular disease and a strong independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis and an increased risk of PAD. The incidence of PAD in T2DMpatients is high [1]. Patients with T2DM have a fourfold increased risk of PAD [2], and the prevalence of PAD is higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic populations [3].
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is secreted predominantly from the ventricular myocardium and is a useful predictor of cardiovascular disease risk [4]. Interestingly, increasing evidences show that BNP is a useful marker not only for cardiac function, but also for other vasculopathies. Increased BNP concentrations have been associated with atherosclerosis [5], and their levels been shown to be elevated in a general population with PAD [6][7][8].
The development of PAD is associated with several risk factors and multiple biomarkers representing various etiologic pathways of atherosclerosis [9]. Recent findings suggest a close relationship between glucose metabolism and BNP levels. BNP levels were found to be higher in patients with T2DM and inversely associated with the risk of T2DM [10][11][12], though the mechanism is not known. These observations suggested a potential role of BNP in the development of T2DM with PAD. However, it is not clear if BNP contributes to reducing or improving the morbidity of PAD in T2DM. To explore such a possibility, we measured serum BNP levels and assessed the potential relationship between BNP levels and PAD among outpatients with T2DM.

Study patients
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (Zhejiang, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects to participate in this study.
A total of 507 outpatients with T2DM (age ≥18 years) in the Department of Endocrinology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from January 2012 to January 2013 were recruited. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of T2DM according to criteria set by the American Diabetes Association [13] and PAD was defined as arterial insufficiency with an ankle-brachial index(ABI) ≤0.90 in either leg [14]. Exclusion criteria were:severe infection (ischemic ulceration/necrosis); acute or severe and chronic diabetic complications (diabetic ketoacidosis or coma, diabetic nephropathy, clinical albuminuria of diabetic nephropathy); poor glucose control (hemoglobin A1c > 10.0%) or requirement of insulin treatment; diseases of the liver or kidney; cancer or autoimmune disease; CVD (including cardiac systolic and diastolic dysfunction, valvular abnormalities, myocardial infarction, or cardiomyopathy, other structural heart diseases and changes in the electrocardiogram due to myocardial ischemia and various arrhythmias); use of diureticsor nitrates; any other condition that (in the investigator's judgment) could affect study participation or confound data interpretation.

General clinical data and laboratory measurements
Clinical and laboratory data were collected from medical records. Cardiac contraction and diastolic functions were evaluated by echocardiography. Diabetic neuropathy was examined by testing vibration (using a 128-Hz tuning fork), pin-prick sensation (using Neurotip™; Owen Mumford, Chipping Norton, UK), temperature sensation (warm and cool rods), and Achilles tendon reflex (tendon hammer). Albumin levels were measured in a spot urine sample, which was collected as the first void in the morning or at random. The results of albumin measurements in spot collections may be expressed as the urinary albumin-tocreatinine ratio (UACR). Albuminuria was defined as two of three the UACR of ≥30 μg/mg on at least two occasions within 3-6 months [15]. Demographic information (age, sex, blood pressure (BP), the body mass index (BMI) and duration of T2DM) was obtained at study baseline. Venous blood samples were collected from all patients in the morning after fasting for 10 h and stored at room temperature. Biochemical parameters such as levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoproteincholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine, uric acid, and homocysteine were measured using an automated clinical chemistry analyzer (Advia 2400; Siemens, Munich, Germany). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levelswere measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Variant II; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

BNP peptide assay
Serum BNP levels were quantified using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Advia Centaur XP; Siemens) with minimum and maximum detectable concentrations of 4.5 pg/ml and 5000 pg/ml, respectively (normal reference range <100 pg/ml). Tests were undertaken in our clinical laboratory. Inter-and intra-batch coefficients of variation were maintained within 5.5% and 3.5%, respectively.

Measurement of the ABI
Measurement of the ABI is a validated, useful and easy tool to diagnose PAD. ABI measurements were done with the patient in the supine position. BP was measured in the bilateral brachial and dorsalis pedis arteries with an 8-MHz Doppler probe. The ABI was calculated by dividing the value of the systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the right or left ankle by the value of the SBP in the arm.

Definitions
An ABI ≤0.9 was selected as the cutoff value for the diagnosis of PAD; an ABI >1.3 was selected as the cutoff value for calcification [14]. Hypertension was defined as SBP >140 mmHg, or diastolic BP >90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medications [16]. The diagnostic criteria of systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <50%) and diastolic dysfunction (E/A ratio <1or >2) were according to guidelines set by the European Society of Cardiology for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure [17]. The diagnosis of diabetic neuropathycan be made after a careful clinical examination [18]. The diagnosis of clinical albuminuria was albuminuria ≥300 μg/mg [15]. Hyperlipidemia was defined as serum TC >6.2 mmol/l and/or TG >2.3 mmol/l or HDL-C <1.04 mmol/l (men), <1.17 mg/dl (women), or use of lipid-lowering agents [19].

Statistical analyses
Data are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or percentage (%) and analyzed using the Student's t-test or chisquare test. Age, sex, CRP level, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and duration of T2DM account for most of the risk associated with the development of PAD [20].
BNP levels did not have a normal distribution, and were divided into four quartiles for analyses: <26, 26-76, 76-100, and 100-529 pg/ml. Analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction was used to compare mean baseline values among the four groups. Logistic regression models were fitted to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for PAD. The association between serum BNP levels and PAD was analyzed using multiple regression analysis adjusted for other CVD risk factors. BNP levelswere highly skewed, so log 10 -transformed values were used to determine linear correlation coefficients for the association between BNP levelsand the ABI. The predictive value of BNP levels was assessed by analyses of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Area under the ROC curve was used to compare the accuracy of the ability to assess the likelihood of PAD between the models adjusted for potential risk factors with and without BNP levels.
Patients were placed into two groups based on PAD and their characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median BNP level was significantly higher in the PAD group than in the non-PAD group (78 [4.5-529] pg/ml vs. 71 [5.0-497] pg/ml, p = 0.001). Compared with the non-PAD group, the duration of T2DM and HbA1c were significantly greater in the PAD group (p = 0.035 and 0.034, respectively). No differences were shown with respect to age, BP, EF, E/A ratio, smoking habits, the BMI, the UACR, serum creatinine as well as levels of CRP, uric acid, fibrinogen, LDL-C, HDL-C and TC (p > 0.05 for all) between the two groups.
The BNP level was negatively correlated with the ABI (r = −0.453, p = 0.033) (Figure 1). Accordingly, we determined the significance and magnitude of the association between the BNP level and PAD. In model 1, after adjustment for age and sex, each 1-SD increment in the BNP level was associated with an increased risk of PAD (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.19-1.45; p = 0.012). In model 2, after adjustment for age, sex, the BMI, BP, smoking habit, the UACR, duration of T2DM, as well as levels of uric acid, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C,and HbA1c, the trend remained significant (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.34; p = 0.021). The odds of having PAD at baseline increased significantly with increase in the quartile of the BNP level (Table 2).
In the ROC analysis, BNP yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.77; p =0.008) for detection of PAD. A BNP level of 78.2 pg/ml was determined as the cutoff value that gave the best combination of sensitivity and specificity (0.719 and 0.681, respectively) (Figure 2A). We determined the effect of the BNP level on assessment of PAD by comparing the areas under the ROC curves between risk models with and without the BNP level ( Figure 2B). The AUC associated with the ROC analysis of model 1 (including age, sex, the BMI, smoking habit, the UACR, hypertension,

Discussion
In the present study, we found a clear association between the BNP levels and the risk of PAD in T2DM patients without overt CVD. This association remained unchanged even after controlling for potential confounding risk factors. Importantly, our study revealed that incorporation of the BNP levels into a model of potential risk factors significantly improved assessment of the likelihood of PAD in T2DM patients. This is the first study providing statistical elucidation of the clinical value of the BNP levels in assessment of the risk of PAD in T2DM outpatients. These findings highlight the potential additive value of measurement of the BNP levels in the risk assessment of PAD in T2DM patients (especially in patients without overt CVD). These findings have important clinical implications because patients with T2DM have an increased risk of developing PAD. Identifying novel risk factors for PAD may help in the development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of PAD in T2DM patients. Some conventional risk biomarkers (smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, HbA1c level and CRP level) were independently associated with PAD [20][21][22].
However, traditional risk factors do not entirely explain the excess risk of PAD in some subjects. Monitoring non-conventional risk biomarkers for PAD in T2DM may be particularly important for the prevention and treatment of PAD. BNP levels are known to be elevated in T2DM patients with asymptomatic diastolic dysfunction [23]. It has been acknowledged that subjects with higher BNP levels are more likely to have conventional cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., hypertension [24], ischemic stroke [25,26], and chronic kidney disease [27]). However, BNP levels are independent of cardiac function and cardiovascular factors [28]. BNP release can be stimulated by various factors, including inflammatory cytokines [29] and renal impairment [30]. All of our subjects had a clear diagnosis of T2DM and those with diabetic complications that could affect the metabolism of BNP were excluded or limited. In our study cohort, the high morbidity of PAD was positively correlated with the BNP levels even after adjustment for other risk factors. Subjects in the highest quartile of the BNP level had a 1.25-fold increased risk of developing PAD compared with subjects in the lowest quartile (first quartile) of the BNP levels. There were a significantly increased risk for patients in the third quartile of the BNP levels but not for patients in the second quartile, suggesting a possible threshold effect of the BNP levels for the prediction of PAD. Furthermore, our data showed that a 1-SD increase in the BNP levels were associated with a 1.16-fold increased risk of PAD after adjustment for the known risk factors for PAD. The BNP levels were also  inversely correlated with the ABI (r = −0.453, p = 0.033). It has been suggested that cardiac endocrine function is more greatly activated in PAD patients than in non-PAD patients [31], which may be why one can predict future coronary artery disease or CVD events in PAD patients with higher BNP levels [32]. Higher BNP levels have been associated with lower functional capacity in the vascular system [33]. Hence, consideration of BNP levels is important for improved prediction of PAD in T2DM patients without overt CVD. The mechanisms through which the BNP levels and PAD are associated are not clear. Studies have shown that the natriuretic peptide family may have a role as anti-migration factors for vascular smooth muscle cells [34]. They also have beneficial effects in T2DM with PAD because natriuretic peptides can promote angiogenesis, modify the function of vascular endothelial cells, reduce cardiac load, and improve blood supply to the legs owing to their diuretic and vasodilatory effects [35][36][37]. In Wistar rats, pretreatment with BNP can attenuate the excessive production of radical oxygen species [38]. Various studies have indicated that BNP has aprotective role in vascular disease, butour data support the notion that higher BNP levels predispose to PAD development in T2DM. However, thesediffering results may not be contradictory because Kuhn et al. [39] found that BNP is expressed in activated satellite cells within ischemic muscle, and suggested that localized BNP elicited protective endothelial effects. However, because of the impairment of BNP receptors in atherosclerosis or ischemic vascular disease [40], the protective effect of BNP is weakened [41], and BNP levels are increased in response to the severity of ischemia as a protective effect. Nevertheless, the production and secretion of BNP is the result of a complex integration among mechanical, chemical, hemodynamic, humoral, ischemic, and inflammatory inputs in PAD [31,42], and the specific mechanism remains to be elucidated. BNP is likely to be a new therapeutic strategyfor T2DM patients with PAD.
Some potential limitations of our study should be noted. First, BNP levels were measured at a single time point for each patient. Second, we focused on a selected patient cohort hospitalized in an endocrinology department in a single center, and whether the conclusions can be generalized to other institutions requires multicenter studies. Third, the ABI is not the "gold standard" to diagnose PAD. Thus, comparison of BNP levels with the ABI to evaluate PAD due to atherosclerosis may not be an optimal method. Further detailed studies are required to investigate the association between BNP levels and PAD.

Conclusions
Higher BNP levels (even in the normal range) are associated with a higher prevalence of PAD in T2DM patients. Routine measurement of BNP levels can improve the predictive ability of PAD in T2DM patients.

Competing interests
The authors affirm they have no competing interests.

Figure 2
The predictive value of BNP levels for PAD can be reflected in ROC plots. A. BNP levels could be of use as predictive marker for PAD. B. Comparison of the assessment of the likelihood of the presence of PAD between models with or without BNP.