{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024539877300613498, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0010224948875255625, 'mean_word_length': 5.846153846153846, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reporting of Dental Radiographs in General Dental Practice

Introduction The selection, processing and interpretation of dental radiographs is the subject of a number of well established, detailed quality assurance programmes such as those outlined in the National Radiation Protection Board (NRPB)’s Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners.1 Nevertheless, the detail of radiographic reporting receives much less attention. On one hand, it is apparent that many radiographs are simply filed away with no report. This is unacceptable practice. On the other hand, teachers and examiners for the FGDP(UK)’s diplomas, such as the Diploma in Restorative Dentistry, will often see case studies from candidates containing the most detailed radiographic reports, evaluating every surface, every restoration and presenting an abundance of negative findings. This is unrealistic and cannot represent the candidates’ everyday practice. Nonetheless, this does raise the following questions: