{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028761061946902654, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0022123893805309734, 'mean_word_length': 6.0703125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Differences Between Rural and Urban Schools, Student Characteristics, and Student Aspirations in Ohio

The major purpose of this research was to describe the relationships between school location (urban vs. rural) and students' occupational and educational aspirations. A secondary purpose was to explore the relationships betweenstudentbackgroundfactors andlocation ofschool. A sample ofurban andrural 12th-grade students andhigh schoolprincipals in Ohio was surveyed. Urban andrural schools differed, as expected, in size, cost per pupil, size of staff, and breadth of curricular and extra-curricular offerings. Urban and rural students differed on the backgroundcharacteristics of ethnicity, grade-point average, curriculum ofenrollment, SES, and educational level of parents. They also differed in aspirations as measured by plans for advanced education, occupational choice, and income expectations.