{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015665796344647518, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011096605744125326, 'mean_word_length': 5.083333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Multivariate time series projections of parameterized age-specific fertility rates.


 1 solution to the dimensionality problem raised by projection of individual age-specific fertility rates is the use of parametric curves to approximate the annual age-specific rates and a multivariate time series model to forecast the curve parameters. Such a method reduces the number of time series to be modeled for women 14-45 years of age from 32 to 40 (the number of curve parameters). In addition, the curves force even longterm fertility projections to exhibit the same smooth distribution across age as historical data. The data base used to illustrate this approach was age-specific fertility rates for US white women in 1921-84. An important advantage of this model is that it permits investigation of the interactions among the total fertility rate, the mean age of childbearing, and the standard deviation of age at childbearing. In the analysis of this particular data base, the contemporaneous relationship between the mean and standard deviation of age at childbearing was the only significant relationship. The addition of bias forecasts to the forecast gamma curve improves forecast accuracy, especially 1-2 years ahead. The most recent US Census Bureau projections have combined a time series model with longterm projections based on demographic judgment. These official projections yielded a slightly higher ultimate mean age and slightly lower standard deviation than those resulting from the model described in this paper.
