{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027098479841374753, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00991407799074686, 'mean_word_length': 5.611353711790393, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Optimizing pulsed‐chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging sequences

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) provides a new imaging contrast mechanism sensitive to labile proton exchange. Pulsed‐CEST imaging is better suited to the hardware constraints on clinical imaging systems when compared with traditional continuous wave‐CEST imaging methods. However, designing optimum pulsed‐CEST imaging sequences entails complicated and time‐consuming numerical integrations. In this work, a simplified and computationally efficient technique is provided to optimize the pulsed‐CEST imaging sequence. An analysis was performed of the optimal average irradiation power and the optimal irradiation flip angle as a function of the acquisition parameters and sample properties in both a two‐pool model and a three‐pool model of endogenous amine exchange. Key simulated and experimental results based on a creatine/agar tissue phantom show that ( 1 ) the average irradiation power is a more meaningful sequence metric than is the average irradiation field amplitude, ( 2 ) the optimal average powers for continuous wave and pulsed‐CEST imaging are approximately equal to each other for a relevant range of solute frequency offsets, exchange rates, and concentrations, ( 3 ) an irradiation flip angle of 180° is optimal or near optimal, independent of the other acquisition parameters and the sample properties, and ( 4 ) higher duty cycles yield higher CEST contrast. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.