{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019759450171821305, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001718213058419244, 'mean_word_length': 5.005154639175258, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
SOME ASPECTS OF DEFINING THE PROPER LITIGANT IN THE ARGUMENTS ABOUT HOUSING RIGHTS PROTECTION OF CIVIL SERVANTS AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS

The author analyses in details laws and regulations about the provision of one-time welfare payment to civil servants and their family members with the goal to define the proper litigant. There are also two units highlighted, in dependence on which the proper litigant can be defined: 1. On the territorial factor, i.e. place of employment of the servant; 2. In the cases of the breach of time limits of the servant application processing about their registration for receiving the one-time welfare payment. The author came to the conclusion that the proper litigant in the disputes about the invalidation of the decision about refusing to register (deregister) for the provision of one-time welfare payment is not a state body, but a commission (territorial commission) of the state body, agency, or other establishment, vested with governmental or other public authorities. The state body will be an interested party in accordance with the dispositions of Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation.