{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.041367665681722246, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005487547488391726, 'mean_word_length': 4.302013422818792, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On Containers and Content, with a Cautionary Note to Philosophers of Mind

Nine features of the container-content relationship are described. It is suggested that, given these features, non-Fodorian philosophers of mind should be wary of talk about " content. " The prototypical container relation is a relation between a single item or group of countable items, and some distinct item with the approximate shape of a cylinder, box, or bag, open on no more than one side, such that the volume of the container substantially exceeds and has as a subset the volume of the items contained. (However, see below for a couple of variations.) For concreteness, we may consider the prototypical container to be a bucket and its contents to be balls. Consider some potentially interesting features of this system: (1.) A bucket contains a ball just in case the ball is physically inside the bucket. It does not matter how things stand outside of the bucket. (2.) In the normal (upright, gravitational) case, it takes a certain amount of effort to get a ball into a bucket and a certain amount of effort to get it back out again. (3.) Balls take up space. A finite bucket can only contain a limited number of non-infinitesmal balls. (4.) Balls are clearly individuated, countable entities. (5.) It is rarely a vague matter whether a bucket contains a ball or not. (6.) There is typically no reason why any two balls can't go in the same bucket or why a ball can't be removed from one bucket and put into another without changing any of the other contents. (7.) A bucket can contain many balls, or only one ball, or no balls. (8.) The ball and the bucket are distinct. The ball is not, for example, a state or configuration of the bucket. (9.) A ball in a bucket is observable only from a privileged position inside or above the bucket. Some modifications, particularly to (4) and (5), are required if we take as prototypical the relation between such a container and a certain amount of stuff, such as water or sand, characterized non-countably by means of a mass noun. If only one kind of stuff is to fill the bucket, there will be no multiple, discrete contents, but one content in varying amounts. Alternatively, if one fills the bucket with wholly distinct kinds of stuff, (4) may be preserved; if we consider semi-distinct fluids, such as orange juice and apple juice, (4) …