{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02046783625730994, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008771929824561403, 'mean_word_length': 4.756302521008403, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
System 37 Viggen: Arms, Technology and the Domestication of Glory

constraining the use of force. It is also the failure to consider the nature of the Second World War itself, whence came the Nuremberg principles. Was that a conflict sui generis that produced a body of law inappropriate to the realities of the postwar era, or if the Nuremberg doctrines had existed prior to 1939, would they have been viewed as wholly suited to the situation? Although exasperating at times for these reasons and others, the study nevertheless succeeds as a whole in obliging one to rethink, at a layman's level, the premises underlying the law of armed conflict, and that is no mean accomplishment.