{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015789473684210527, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.34, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
In re Estate of Longeway.


 The guardian of an incompetent patient appealed a lower court's decision dismissing the guardian's petition to withdraw artificially administered nutrition and hydration from the patient. The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that the guardian could exercise the right to refuse artificial nutrition and hydration on behalf of the patient under certain conditions. The patient must be terminally ill and diagnosed as irreversibly comatose. The patient's attending physician and two other consulting physicians must concur in this diagnosis. Also, a court order is required for the guardian to withdraw life support. The court further ruled that specific express intent is helpful in determining whether to withdraw artificial sustenance, but it is not necessary for exercising the guardian's substituted judgement. The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the lower court's dismissal and remanded the case for further proceedings.
