{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026126126126126126, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0045045045045045045, 'mean_word_length': 4.878306878306878, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison Normalized Dryness Built-Up Index (NDBI) with Enhanced Built-Up and Bareness Index (EBBI) for Identification Urban in Buleleng Sub-District

The research aims to determine how much accuracy is improved in developing settlements and distinguish the areas built up and vacant land in Buleleng, Bali district. This study used remote sensing methods to monitor and detect changes in the waking area using Landsat 8 OLI imagery.  Identify settlement developments using the Normalized Difference Built-up Index (NDBI) and Enhanced Built-Up and Bareness Index (EBBI) algorithms. Both algorithms use red and infrared bands as the basis for identifying building differences. As a result, NDBI and EBBI have differences where the accuracy of EBBI is higher than NDBI by 84% and 82%. The difference in accuracy is influenced by the appearance of vegetation and clay-roofed buildings. Based on that, it can be concluded that in identifying the building, EBBI has a higher capacity compared to NDBI, but it must be ensured that in the use of EBBI, the area studied has a more dominant appearance of the building.