{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04276069017254314, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02250562640660165, 'mean_word_length': 4.558333333333334, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Surface treatment of dentin with GLUMA and iron compounds for bonding indirect restorations.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate five dentin bonding systems simulating indirect restorations. The surface of bovine and human dentin was primed with a glutaraldehyde agent (GLUMA) and placed in a humidor at 37 degrees C for 168 h. In an experimental bonding system (GLUMA/CY/SB), the surfaces were etched with phosphoric acid, primed with cytochrome c, and then bonded to an acrylic rod with a self-curing resin (4-META/MMA-TBB). Specimens using two commercially available bonding systems [All-Bond 2 (AB2) and Super-Bond C & B (10-3/SB)] and two controls with and without GLUMA (GLUMA/10-3/SB and CY/SB) were also prepared. Tensile testing revealed that the bond strengths were influenced by the bonding system, 168 h dentin exposure and their interaction, but not by the tooth origin. AB2 showed the lowest bond strength. With the 10-3/SB system, exposing the dentin to humidity resulted in a decrease in bond strength. After 168 h of exposure, no significant differences were observed between 10-3/SB and CY/SB. The most effective bonding was obtained with the bonding systems of GLUMA/10-3/SB and GLUMA/CY/SB. Improved outcome is expected with these bonding systems when building up abutment teeth with indirect restorations.