{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016057091882247992, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007136485280999108, 'mean_word_length': 5.0978260869565215, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The oil cycle, the Federal Reserve, and the monetary and exchange rate policies of Qatar

Supporters of the Arab oil-exporting countries’ decades-long fixed exchange rate regime argue that since, oil is traded in US dollars, pegging to the dollar is optimal. However, the weakening relationship between oil prices and the US economy in terms of the Federal Reserve's expansionary monetary stance amid soaring oil prices for much of the previous decade has raised questions about the viability of the peg. Using Qatar as a case study, this paper empirically analyzes whether the synchronization pattern of business cycles has recently changed between Qatar and the USA. The results of the analysis show a pronounced desynchronization or decoupling of business cycles between Qatar and the USA during 2001–2010. Moreover, the dissimilarly of demand shocks between the two countries suggests that the imported monetary policy stance of the Federal Reserve has not been viable for Qatar in recent years. A natural implication of our findings is the need for a truly independent monetary policy oriented toward domestic goals.