{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012935323383084577, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005970149253731343, 'mean_word_length': 4.952662721893491, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Management of small soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity in adults.

I am writing in regard to the article by Geer et al, 1 published in the November 1992 issue of the Archives. This article has been used by clinicians to suggest that postoperative irradiation might not be appropriate in high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity in adults. It is the responsibility of theArchivesto ensure that articles published do not lead to unjustified changes in treatment protocol. Owing to the fact that the tabulated data in the article do not compare high-grade tumors undergoing irradiation with high-grade tumors that do not, the conclusions stated in the article and in the abstract are misleading and run counter to previous evidence supporting radiation treatment for sarcomas of the head and neck. 2 The authors instead tabulate and graph survival curves of tumors with and without postoperative irradiation and claim no significant difference, but this does not address the efficacy of irradiation