{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017899761336515514, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.453846153846154, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Improving Public Health Care: Lessons on Governance from Five Cities

Policy-oriented investigations into public health care delivery have been limited, especially during the Reagan era of competition and profit-based health care, when the inner city was essentially forgotten. In this study, policymakers toured five urban public health care systems in different parts of the country to promote consideration of a new governance for Chicago and Cook County's complicated and uncoordinated care for the medically indigent. A comparison of patterns of governance revealed strengths and weaknesses of each model. Local leadership and the political will to evolve a system of care, with clear connections between the public and private sectors, account for each city's relative success in addressing mounting needs of inner-city populations.