{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011752136752136752, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011752136752136752, 'mean_word_length': 5.006410256410256, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Fishing Behavior and the Length of the Fishing Season

The basic hypothesis of this paper is that the amount of fishing that a fish harvester undertakes during a year is not determined entirely by circumstances which are exogenous to the fisher, such as weather conditions and resource availability, but is also partially a matter of individual choice. The paper develops a behavioral model of fishing from the perspective that the decision to modify the period of time over which fishing takes place is governed by a comparison of the marginal benefits and costs of doing so. The model is tested econometric ally as an error-components model using a 10% longitudinal sample of recipients of seasonal fishermen's unemployment insurance benefits in Newfoundland over the period 1971-93. The results suggest that the Canadian unemployment insurance program has reduced the length of the fishing season in Newfoundland by about 8-10 weeks.