{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0213089802130898, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.721739130434782, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Old Wine in New Bottles? Changing London Histories

they broke ranks and tore it to pieces for souvenirs. Thus the elite unwittingly yielded center stage to the plebs. Russell's point about the unreliability of elite symbols suggests a point to make about Georgian-era historiography as a whole. In line with the scholarly trend of the last two decades, Russell, Wilson, and Thomas emphasize that elite political power was contested and negotiated on many levels. But in their own ways, Christie and Root remind us that that power was still formidable. There remains a wide world to explore beyond Westminster, but Westminster still has to be reckoned with.