{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03463855421686747, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009036144578313253, 'mean_word_length': 5.333333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Nature of Rousseau’s “Rêveries”: Physical, Human, Aesthetic, SVEC 2008:03 (review)

of detail and a proliferation of competing agendas. Readers, too, may find themselves losing sight of the forest while encountering such a diversity of trees. The decision to conclude the collection with the strong statements of the editors themselves is helpful, though some of their claims might usefully have been transferred to the introduction. In the final analysis, however, it is all the contributors’ rigorous and impeccably researched attention to the local instance that rewards the reader—even as it makes the volume, as a volume, occasionally frustrating to read.