{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017263427109974423, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004475703324808184, 'mean_word_length': 5.60337552742616, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Automatic fluorescence metaphase finder speeds translocation scoring in FISH painted chromosomes.

A fluorescence metaphase finder was constructed with commercially available hardware and a standard Unix workstation. Its accuracy was measured in terms of the number of false positive and false negative detected metaphases on a variety of different slide preparations. The metaphase finder was used in a translocation scoring experiment in which metaphase preparations of human peripheral blood lymphocytes were hybridized with whole chromosome probes to chromosomes #1, #2, and #4. The automatic finder presented metaphases to the cytogeneticist, centered in the eyepieces at x63. The cytogeneticist's scores of analyzable metaphases and of painted chromosomes involved in rearrangements were recorded. The time for the analysis was recorded and compared to the time to analyze a similar number of cells in a purely visual experiment in which the cytogeneticist scanned for cells and analyzed them, both at x63. The results showed that, neglecting the machine time spent scanning unattended, the amount of time required for the analysis was reduced by a factor of three. Furthermore, in this experiment the metaphase finder found more scorable metaphases than the cytogeneticist found by visual scanning. Machine-assisted scoring had additional, less quantifiable, benefits; notably that digital images of metaphases sometimes assisted the analysis of chromosome rearrangements, that cells could be revisited easily, and that the analysis was much less fatiguing.