{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02022058823529412, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.8125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Scholarly Work of Digital Libraries

SUMMARY In the past, librarians have assembled and interpreted collections for smaller audiences that frequently were limited to one-on-one consultations in a highly specialized environment. Digital technologies, however, make it possible to combine, analyze, interpret, and disseminate the content of our collections in ways never before possible. This paper will compare and contrast two digital library programs and their innovative approaches to scholarship and knowledge creation and dissemination.