{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013944223107569721, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008964143426294821, 'mean_word_length': 5.4423076923076925, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Comparison of extracapsular cataract extraction with implantation of the artificial lens into the posterior chamber and intracapsular cataract extraction with implantation of the artificial lens into the anterior chamber].

Advantages and disadvantages of both methods are presented on the basis of comparison of 1200 cases of intracapsular cataract extraction with anterior chamber lens implantation and 600 cases of extracapsular cataract extraction with implantation of posterior chamber lens. One has to state that in general the preferential method of extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior lens implantation is connected with several complications. The main disadvantage of intracapsular cataract extraction with anterior chamber implantation is--in 66 p.c.--deformation of the pupil. From our point of view this is a problem of cosmetic nature. On the basis of comparison of disadvantages and advantages we are of opinion that both methods are equally suitable for a broad clinical use.