{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01264591439688716, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.7254901960784315, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Regional Effects of Research and Technology Institutions – Valuation Methods along the Innovation Process: Monitoring Project Cooperation

Regional impact analyses of scientific institutions show decision makers the importance of infrastructure. The analyses follow different approaches and models, are mostly limited to previously defined effect areas and mainly investigate the effects of universities. This article shows the different evaluation methods of scientific institutions along the entire innovation process. The aim is to provide a holistic overview of methods for identifying evaluation gaps. The first section explains the difference between the linear and dynamic innovation process. Then, the method analysis along the innovation process follows. This is preceded by a critical evaluation of the methods and the definition of the focus for further work. Scenarios on regionality, frequency and dynamics describe my own analysis approach and finally result in a monitoring system of regional project cooperation.