{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03306797305572566, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020820575627679118, 'mean_word_length': 5.029520295202952, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Comparison of Organ Dose Calculation Using Monte Carlo Simulation and In-phantom Dosimetry in CT Examination].

Direct measurement of each patient organ dose from computed tomography (CT) is not possible. Most methods to estimate patient organ dose is using Monte Carlo simulation with dedicated software. However, the method and the relative differences between organ dose simulation and measurement is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare organ doses evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation with doses evaluated by in-phantom dosimetry. The simulation software Radimetrics (Bayer) was used for the calculation of organ dose. Measurement was performed with radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeter (RPLD) set at various organ positions within RANDO phantom. To evaluate difference of CT scanner, two different CT scanners were used in this study. Angular dependence of RPLD and measurement of effective energy were performed for each scanner. The comparison of simulation and measurement was evaluated by relative differences. In the results, angular dependence of RPLD at two scanners was 31.6±0.45 mGy for SOMATOM Definition Flash and 29.2±0.18 mGy for LightSpeed VCT. The organ dose was 42.2 mGy (range, 29.9-52.7 mGy) by measurements and 37.7 mGy (range, 27.9-48.1 mGy) by simulations. The relative differences of organ dose between measurement and simulation were 13%, excluding of breast's 42%. We found that organ dose by simulation was lower than by measurement. In conclusion, the results of relative differences will be useful for evaluating organ doses for individual patients by simulation software Radimetrics.