{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019349164467897976, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.429378531073446, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The revolution in military affairs debate and non‐lethal weapons

This article introduces a discussion on developments in political and strategic thinking on the use of existing and emerging weapons (including Non‐lethal Weapons) and their doctrinal operational implications in the context of present trends in international relations. It asserts the need to address both the strategic assumptions and the political implications of choosing military‐led solutions to trends in international social conflict. The so‐called Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA) must be considered in the light of the current debate on the military application of non‐lethal weapons (NLWs) to present or future conflict. The issue is introduced from a politico‐strategic perspective, with a critique of the RMA debate as a starting point for discussion of the role of NLWs in conflict. Questions are set out for the politicians and strategists who are asked to formulate policy based on technology to be used in new political/social conflicts. The danger of neglecting other important dimensions of politics and strategy vis‐à‐vis present conflict is noted.