{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025389025389025387, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001638001638001638, 'mean_word_length': 5.6775956284153, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The interaction of the alliance and therapy microprocess: a sequential analysis.

The interaction of the working alliance with the therapy microprocess was explored in a sequential analytic study of brief therapy (N = 32). The alliance was largely formed within the first session and was most associated with a mutual emotional engagement process. Thereafter, log-linear modeling revealed marked alliance-related and primarily phase-specific effects on the therapy microprocesses. The alliance was associated with differing patterns of therapy activities, topics, emotions, and verbal content. High-alliance midtherapy displayed more of an alternating pattern of therapist-patient emotional engagement, although therapists also appeared to take greater charge in midtherapy. High-alliance patients were generally more emotionally engaged and responded with less dejection to therapists. The alliance-dependent differences in verbal content appeared to be secondary, with the most obvious negative effects of low-alliance levels appearing in midtherapy. Apparently, the high- and low-alliance therapies developed somewhat differently, a factor that may need to be considered in constructing theories of therapeutic change.