{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026595744680851064, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00851063829787234, 'mean_word_length': 5.580419580419581, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
National construction and popular erasure in Colombia


 This article analyses the diachronic symbolic struggle (1810–1991) waged in Colombia’s foundational documents over the
 legitimation and delegitimation of social relations through the concepts “people” and “nation.” Following the introduction, the method and
 theory are explained: concept analysis and language-based social ontology. The analysis of the foundational documents follows. These are
 analysed as extended status function declarations that attempt to legitimate and delegitimate the concepts “people” and “nation”, in order
 to authorize/deauthorize possible social relations. On the basis of the analysis, the conclusion briefly specifies the discourse of
 nationism as the ontologisation and wielding of the idea of the nation against internal dissent/opposition, and points up the fundamental
 importance of symbolic practice in the struggle to change social reality.