{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02443609022556391, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0018796992481203006, 'mean_word_length': 5.345238095238095, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Performance measures for sparse spike inversion vs. basis pursuit inversion

Sparse Spike Inversion (SSI) and Basis Pursuit Inversion (BPI) are two methods for seismic inversion which utilize sparse inversion techniques. A LARS-LASSO solver is used for comparison of their performances. We propose the use of the F-measure to better evaluate the methods' capability to correctly identify reflections from layers' boundaries. We also show that flexible l1 penalization in the LASSO solution holds potential for improving performance.