{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025293586269196026, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007226738934056007, 'mean_word_length': 5.674698795180723, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The effects of relevant instructor self-disclosure on student affect and cognitive learning: A live lecture experiment

ABSTRACT The purpose of this teaching experiment was to examine the causal effect of relevant (compared to irrelevant) instructor self-disclosure on student affect and cognitive learning. Undergraduate students (N = 288) were randomly assigned to a 19-minute classroom lecture with an instructor who taught the same lesson but self-disclosed either relevant or irrelevant information while teaching. Results indicated that relevant instructor self-disclosure increased student affect in students’ likelihood to enroll with the instructor again but did not influence students’ general affect toward the instructor. Findings also revealed a direct effect of self-disclosure relevance on students’ test scores; on average, students scored 8.42% higher on a short-term recall test compared to students in the irrelevant self-disclosure condition, controlling for lesson coherence. Practical implications are provided for how instructors might use relevant self-disclosures in their teaching.