{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02050473186119874, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.105769230769231, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Additions to a Friedman Bibliography

In the instance of the slavery question, then, Wordsworth's habitual mistrust of enthusiastic idealism focused itself on Clarkson and his quest for a better world. Despite their friendship, the two men were natural opponents. Though they maintained a respect and even some affection for one another, they were wedded to rival outlooks. Enthusiasm and restraint, eagerness for reform and patient faith were the conflicting ideals of Clarkson and Wordsworth. Reading Wordsworth's letter on the slavery question, we see through the eyes of a Romantic Tory one of the first of the earnest Victorians.