{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03734939759036145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014457831325301205, 'mean_word_length': 5.2481203007518795, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical comments on management of urosepsis in a general urological department.

Over a period of 6 years 192 cases of urosepsis have been recorded and managed in our urological department. In almost all cases (97%) the primary focus of infection was the urinary tract and the responsible microorganisms were Gram-negative rods, in order Enterobacter, B. Proteus, E. Coli, Klebsiella and others. Clinical features were dominated by symptoms related to failure or insufficiency of end organs (fever, hypotension, oliguria, mental disorders, respiratory distress etc.). Bacteremia was diagnosed with an incidence of 66%, septic shock 12% and MSOF 20%. Negative bacteriological tests do not rule out the diagnosis of systemic infection. Risk factors are considered advanced age, uremia, diabetes, malnutrition and extensive surgery.