{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034592016724374466, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020415496178219115, 'mean_word_length': 5.043229372285827, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Karyotypes, B-chromosomes and meiotic abnormalities in 13 populations of Alebra albostriella and A. wahlbergi (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae) from Greece

Abstract In this work 13 populations of the leafhopper species Alebra albostriella (Fallén, 1826) (6 populations) and A. wahlbergi (Boheman, 1845) (7 populations) (Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) from Greece were studied cytogenetically. We examined chromosomal complements and meiosis in 41 males of A. albostriella sampled from Castanea sativa, Fagus sylvatica and Quercus cerris and in 21 males of A. wahlbergi sampled from C. sativa, Acer opalus and Ulmus sp. The species were shown to share 2n = 22 + X(0) and male meiosis of the chiasmate preductional type typical for Auchenorrhyncha. In all populations of A. albostriella and in all but two populations of A. wahlbergi B chromosomes and/or different meiotic abnormalities including the end-to-end non-homologous chromosomal associations, translocation chains, univalents, anaphasic laggards besides aberrant sperms were encountered. This study represents the first chromosomal record for the genus Alebra and one of the few population-cytogenetic studies in the Auchenorrhyncha.


Introduction
The leafhopper genus Alebra Fieber, 1872 (Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae) comprises a complex of phytophagous species with several degrees of association to deciduous trees and shrubs. This Holarctic genus is represented in Europe by six valid species and several host associated populations of unknown taxonomic status. The taxonomy of Alebra is difficult due to the very slight morphological differences in male genital structures, a significant degree of intraspecific color pattern variation and the common occurrence of two or more species on the same food plant Loukas 1988, Aguin-Pombo 2002). In the family Cicadellidae 387 species in 263 genera have been studied in respect to karyotype (Kuznetsova and Aguin-Pombo in press) but until now the genus Alebra remained totally untouched by chromosomal investigation.
Chromosomal polymorphisms in natural populations may play a significant role in speciation (White 1978, King 1993, Kawakami et al. 2011. This can easily be proven in cases in which chromosome rearrangements are easily detected as in some dipterans having giant polytene chromosomes in salivary glands. Quite the opposite situation is found in the Auchenorrhyncha with their rather small holokinetic chromosomes. Due to the absence of localized centromeres, the identification of rearrangements in holokinetic chromosomes is either difficult (e.g. translocations and deletions) or even completely impossible (duplications and inversions) if routine chromosome staining is applied. Despite the fact that approximately 820 auchenorrhynchan species have so far been karyotyped, all the data obtained concern almost exclusively chromosome numbers and gross karyotype morphology, and only few records of chromosomal polymorphisms have been published (for review see Kuznetsova and Aguin-Pombo in press).
In the present work, cytogenetic analysis of Alebra albostriella (Fallén, 1826) and A. wahlbergi (Boheman, 1845) was performed using routine chromosome staining. A study of 13 Greek populations of these species inhabiting different deciduous trees was undertaken to reveal whether the populations of these species display any polymorphism for chromosomal complements and meiotic patterns.

Materials and methods
Altogether, 41 males from 6 populations of A. albostriella and 21 males from 7 populations of A. wahlbergi inhabiting 5 different species of deciduous trees in Greece have been collected from 1989 to 1992 on plant foliage with a sweeping net. The locality names, altitude, data of collection and food plants are listed in Table 1, and the places of collection are also mapped on Fig. 1. For chromosome studies, adult males were fixed in Carnoy solution (3:1 ethanol and glacial acetic acid) and stored at -10°C. Chromosomal analysis was performed using conventional squashing procedure. Testes were dissected out, stained with 2% acetic orcein and squashed in a drop of 45% acetic acid under an 18-mm square coverslip. From 1 to 14 individuals in each population were examined. Chromosome preparations were analyzed under a Leica DM 4000B microscope (Leica Microsystems Wetzlar GmbH, Germany) with a 100× objective. Images were taken with a Leica DFC 350 FX camera using Leica Application Suite 2.8.1 software with an Image Overlay module. The data obtained are presented in Tables 2-4.

Standard karyotype and meiosis
In males, the majority of cells showed 23 chromosomes at mitotic metaphases ( Fig. 2a) and 12 units at meiotic metaphases I (MI) (Fig. 2b, c). The karyotype is asymmetric with two size groups of chromosomes. In mitosis six larger chromosomes and other chromosomes constituting a decreasing series in size were present. Chromosomes had no primary constrictions, i.e. centromeres and the sex chromosome could not be identified. At MI, 11 autosomal bivalents, including three larger, and a univalent X-chromosome were encountered (n=11 + X). Male karyotype formula of the species is thus as follows: 2n=22 + X(0). The univalent X-chromosome was similar in size to one of the larger half-bivalents within the group of smaller chromosomes and its location at MI was random. Bivalents mainly had a single terminal/subterminal or, rarer, interstitial chiasma, however in few nuclei up to four rings were present indicative of two terminal/subterminal chiasmata being formed in the larger bivalents (Fig. 2d, e). At anaphase I (AI), all the autosomes segregated to opposite poles and the X moved to one pole without dividing. The reductional division resulted thus in two daughter metaphase II (MII) cells with 11A+X and 11A, respectively (Fig. 2f ).

B-chromosomes
In 4 out of 20 males analyzed in the populations ASE, AACM, AANE (sampled from Castanea sativa) and AATPF (sampled from Fagus sylvatica) one or two small B-chro-  mosomes (additional to the standard complement) were found (Table 2). In the polymorphic populations, three males (1-AACM, 1-AANE and 1-AATPF) showed a single B-chromosome with the frequency of about 1% per specimen while male 10-ASE had   (Table 4). B-chromosomes were different in size in different males while always appreciably smaller than the X-univalent and negatively heteropycnotic at late prophase and MI (Fig. 2g, h). At MI, B-chromosome(s) showed random distribution relative to autosomal bivalents and X-chromosome. In the case of two B-chromosomes, they did not show any connection to each other ( Fig. 2h).

Meiotic abnormalities
Different kinds of meiotic abnormalities were encountered in 12 males (29% of the total number of males) sampled from all the 6 populations ( Table 2). In males 2, 3 and 4 of ASE (from C. sativa), in both studied males of AANE (from C. sativa), and in male 3 of AATPF (from F. sylvatica) two to four bivalents were occasionally associated by ends. The univalent X-chromosome was very often involved in these associations. Non-homologous telomeres did not touch intimately each other but unstained gaps were seen between the bivalents (Fig. 2i, j). In some males (Table 2), one or two middle-sized bivalents were seen as univalents in some cells at diakinesis and MI ( Fig. 2k). In addition, populations ASE, AACM, AANE and AAPA (from C. sativa) and AATPF (from F. sylvatica) the majority of studied males (61%; N=25) showed macrospermatids coexisting with normal spermatids within a cyst. Macrospermatids were different in size being either approximately twice larger or much larger than the normal spermatids (Fig. 2l). Some males with aberrant spermatids displayed also one or other type of meiotic abnormalities, including lagging chromosomes at anaphases ( Fig. 2m) ( Table 2).

Standard karyotype and male meiosis
In sampled males, 11 autosomal bivalents and the univalent X-chromosome were present in cells at diakinesis and MI ( Fig. 3a, b), male karyotype formula of this species being thus 2n = 22 + X(0). Much as in A. albostriella, this karyotype was asymmetric with three larger bivalents and 8 smaller bivalents, the X-chromosome being similar in size to one of the larger half-bivalents in this second group. The chromosomes had no centromeres. The univalent X-chromosome was located randomly at diakinesis and MI. The bivalents mainly had a single terminal/subterminal or rarely interstitial chiasma, however, two chiasmata (rings on Fig. 3b) and occasionally three chiasmata (arrowed on Fig. 3c) could be formed in larger bivalents. In few cells at diakinesis and metaphase I four bivalents or (in male 1-WNE) even six bivalents with two chiasmata each were observed (not shown). Both autosomes and X-chromosome separated reductionally during the first division and divided equationally during the second division of meiosis.

B-chromosomes
In 3 out of 9 males analysed in the populations WEDE (sampled from Ulmus sp.) and WKE (sampled from Acer opalus) one or two B-chromosomes were encountered ( Table 3). The polymorphic male 3-WKE showed a single B-chromosome in about 1% of MI (Fig. 3d, Table 4). Males 1-WEDE and 1-WKE showed each a pair of Bs at MI with frequencies of approximately 60% and 80%, respectively (Fig. 3e, Table 4). In every case B-chromosomes were very small, negatively heteropycnotic and distributed randomly with reference to each other, to the bivalents and to the X-chromosome.

Meiotic abnormalities
Meiotic abnormalities were encountered in 11 males (52% of the total number of males) sampled from 5 out of 7 studied populations. Populations WKA and WCPF showed no meiotic disturbances however in our study they were represented by only one male each (Table 3). In males 2-WEDE, 2-WSE, 1-and 2-WANE the bivalents occasionally formed associations involving two or three bivalents connected by telomere ends. Non-homologous telomeres did not touch intimately each other but unstained gaps were seen between the bivalents (Fig. 3f ). In addition, male 1-WANE had nuclei at diakinesis with X-chromosome, 7 bivalents and a translocation chain of four bivalents united by chiasmata (Fig. 3g). The chromosomal complement of these cells was in fact n = 7AA + 1(4AA) + X. Unfortunately, because of poor spreading of chromosomes in the slide no statistical analysis of the occurrence of translocation chains in this male was possible. Further still, we failed to detect the number of bivalents involved into certain translocation chains. In males 1-WEDE, 1-WSE, 2-WKE and 3-WANE, one of the middle-sized bivalents was present as univalents at MI (Fig. 3h). In populations WEDE, WKE and WATPF, 4 out of 14 males showed macrospermatids which were of approximately twice the normal size and coexisted with normal spermatids within a cyst (Fig. 3i). Among males with macrospermatids, only that 2-WEDE displayed meiotic disturbances namely the end-to-end non-homologous associations of bivalents (Table 3).

Standard karyotypes and meiosis
A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi were found to have the same karyotype of 2n = 22 + X(0) encountered without variation in 30,6% of studied males (N=19) and with some variation due to polymorphism in the rest of males (N=43) . The species share likewise a similar gross morphology of karyotypes. Both karyotypes are asymmetric in terms of the heterogeneity of chromosome size: one size group includes three pairs of larger chromosomes and the other group includes 8 pairs of smaller chromosomes. Within every group, chromosomes represent continuous gradation in size and therefore can not been reliably distinguished by conventional cytogenetic approaches. The X-chromosome is close by size to one of the larger chromosomes within the smaller-sized group. Chromosomes are holokinetic as in other Hemiptera; that is, the centromeric activity is dispersed along the length of each chromosome rather than concentrated at one point (Schrader 1935).
In spite of holokinetic nature of chromosomes, there are only a few Cicadellidae genera in which chromosome number has been sufficiently liable to change in the course of speciation whereas most genera have a stable number of chromosomes (Kuznetsova and Aguin-Pombo in press). As mentioned above, A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi are the first representatives of the leafhopper genus Alebra studied in respect to karyotype. The chromosome complement of 2n = 22 + X(0) found in these species is fairly common in the Cicadellidae (Kuznetsova and Aguin-Pombo in press) but has never been recorded for the subfamily Typhlocybinae in which approximately 90 species in 35 genera are presently known cytologically (Kirillova 1987, Aguin-Pombo et al. 2006, Juan 2011. The only exception is probably a species referred to as Gen. nov. 6 for which Juan (2011) recorded n=12 (suggesting thus 2n = 22 + X).
Cytological analysis of male meiosis in A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi revealed that it was of the typical auchenorrhynchan type where all the chromosomes undergo segregation at anaphase I and chromatids separate at anaphase II (Halkka 1959). The small bivalents invariably had only one terminal/subterminal or, rarely, interstitial chiasma. In the larger bivalents one-two chiasmata were formed; in separate diakinesis cells up to six ring bivalents with two terminal/subterminal chiasmata were present. Halkka (1964) was the first to show that only one-two chiasmata are typically formed in male meiosis in Auchenorrhyncha species. Quite recently, Nokkala et al. (2004) have proved that the low number of chiasmata (one-two in a bivalent from a cytological standpoint) is characteristic of holokinetic chromosomes as such. The authors showed that holokinetic bivalents with multiple chiasmata entered AI but were unable to complete it as a result of wrong separation of homologues. It is noteworthy however that in our material the largest bivalents showed occasionally three and even four chiasmata. Multiple (more than two) chiasmata have also been described in other groups with holokinetic chromosomes, including in the Auchenorrhyncha (e.g. Kuznetsova et al. 2009a, b, Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2012, however, the work by Nokkala et al. (2004) still remains the only one in which the further fate of cells with such bivalents in meiosis was traced in detail.
In the majority of auchenorrhynchans, at least in all hitherto studied planthopper species (Fulgoroidea), the univalent X-chromosome shows a clear tendency to be arranged at the periphery of MI plate presumably forming its own meiotic spindle (Halkka 1959, Kuznetsova et al. 1998, Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2006). In contrast to this, in both leafhopper species studied in the present work, the univalent Xchromosome tended to locate randomly among the bivalents at MI.
Polymorphism for chromosomal rearrangements, B-chromosomes and meiotic abnormalities are not rare in nature and has been recorded for numerous species of plants and animals, including insects (White 1973). This kind of information is however very scarce in the Auchenorrhyncha. In this group, among approximately 820 species studied cytogenetically, B-chromosomes and different chromosomal rearrangements have been reported in several species only (Kuznetsova and Aguin-Pombo in press). In light of this, it is somewhat unusual to find so extensive variation which occurs in A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi from Greece. A total of 62 individuals from 13 population samples belonging to both species were examined. The studied populations inhabited different food plants (F. sylvatica, C. sativa, Q. cerris, A. opalus) and different altitudes ranging from 20 m to 1200 m above sea level (Table 1). In all 6 populations of A. albostriella, 29 males (71%; N=41) showed meiotic abnormalities and of these 4 males displayed additionally B-chromosomes. In 5 populations of A. wahlbergi, 11 males (52%; N=21) showed meiotic abnormalities, and of these 2 males displayed also Bchromosomes. In addition, one further male showed B-chromosomes while no meiotic abnormalities. The remaining two populations of A. wahlbergi, each with the only studied specimen, showed neither B-chromosomes nor meiotic abnormalities.

B-chromosomes
B-chromosomes are accessory genomic elements that are known to occur approximately in 15% of living species (Beukeboom 1994). In the Auchenorrhyncha, B-chromosomes were described in several species of planthoppers (Fulgoroidea) (Halkka 1959, Booij 1982, Kirillova and Kuznetsova 1990, den Bieman 1988 but have never been found to date in any species of leafhoppers (Cicadellidae). In leafhoppers A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi studied herein, B-chromosomes were found in low numbers (0-2) in 4 males of the first species (in 4 populations) and in 3 males of the second species (in 2 populations). In both species, B chromosomes were fairly small with the exception of male 1-AANE in which a single B-chromosome was about two times larger compared to Bs in other males (Fig. 2g). In every case however the Bs were much smaller than the univalent X-chromosome and conspicuous during meiotic prophase and metaphase I because of their negative heteropycnosis. When Bs were two in number, they did not pair and passed randomly through meiosis as univalents being still maintained in populations. Also, B-chromosome(s) did not connect to the univalent X-chromosome at MI as it was observed by Kirillova and Kuznetsova (1990) in several planthopper species from the family Delphacidae. The inter-population differences in B-chromosome distribution is believed to depend on different selective factors (Beukeboom 1994, Camacho 2004. It is interesting to note in this connection that in delphacid species Javesella pellucida (Fabricius, 1794) B-chromosomes were present only in populations inhabiting Northeast Siberia and Kamchatka whereas individuals sampled from different populations in European Russia lacked B-chromosomes (Kirillova and Kuznetsova 1990). In our study, the occurrence and frequency of B-chromosomes in males showed no relation with particular food plants on which populations inhabit. For example, A. albostriella males with Bs were collected both from C. sativa and F. sylvatica; A. wahl-bergi males with Bs were sampled both from Ulmus sp. and A. opalus. Similarly, no relationship was established between the occurrence of Bs and the habitat altitude above sea level: in A. albostriella Bs were present in populations inhabiting at 440 m and higher altitudes, while in A. wahlbergi they were found at lower altitudes (20m-520m).
In studied populations, the frequency of B chromosomes was rather low. Thus, in A. wahlbergi they were present in 14% and in A. albostriella in only 10% of specimens studied. The frequency of individuals with 1B and 2Bs differed between the species. Thus, in four A. albostriella populations with B-chromosomes, 9,6% of males carried 1B and 3,2% carried 2B, whereas in two A. wahlbergi populations with Bs, 11% of males had 1B and 22% had 2B. The data concerning the frequency of B chromosomes in natural populations of these species are too scarce to draw any firm conclusions. Noteworthy that the frequency of cells with B-chromosomes in 2B-males was markedly higher compared with that in 1B-carriers: 60,7%-83,7% against 0,65%-1,8% (Table 4). This observation suggests the existence of an accumulation mechanism responsible for maintaining the 2Bs in studied populations. Interesting, no males with more than two Bs were found in studied specimens. One can suppose that in Alebra populations, 1 or 2 B-chromosomes are tolerable to B-carriers and that natural selection operates by eliminating individuals with more than two Bs. In contrast, in the aforesaid planthopper species J. pellucida, males with up to four B-chromosomes were found (Kirillova and Kuznetsova 1990). However, in this species males with larger number of Bs were less frequent: males with 1B predominated (89%), males with 2Bs and 3Bs occurred with equal frequency (56%) whereas males with 4Bs were rare (11%).
The question of the adaptive significance of B-chromosomes in natural populations has been argued over for decades (Camacho et al. 2000), with the final position showing little if any substantial evidence to support such a role (Jones and Houben 2003). Among many others, the influence of B-chromosomes on recombination through the modulation of chiasma frequency and distribution in A-chromosomes has been recorded (e.g. in Orthoptera; Camacho et al. 1980Camacho et al. , 2000. In A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi, intraindividual analysis demonstrated that chiasma frequency in a nucleus was independent of the occurrence and number of B-chromosomes that it contains. Similarly, there was no relationship between the occurrence of B-chromosomes and the occurrence, frequency and types of meiotic abnormalities in a male. As an example, B-chromosomes were absent in male 1-WNE which had bivalents with three chiasmata and in males 2, 3 and 4 of ASE with the highest percent of meiotic abnormalities (Tables 2 and 3). In some insects, B-carriers have shown a significant increase of the number of macrospermatids (Suja et al. 1986) however in our material such a correspondence was not observed.

Meiotic abnormalities
As noted above, information on chromosome rearrangements and meiotic disturbances in auchenorrhynchan species is very scarce. A number of meiotic abnormalities including agmatoploidy (a result of fission of holokinetic chromosomes), aneuploidy, loose pairings of sex chromosomes and shrinkage of cytoplasm (changes in cytoplasmic volume) were described in three biotypes of the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stål, 1854) from the family Delphacidae (Goh et al. 1992). A translocation polymorphism was encountered in the Australian leafhopper Alodeltocephalus draba Evans, 1966 (Whitten andTaylor 1969). Some other examples are presented in a review of Kuznetsova and Aguin-Pombo (in press). In A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi, one or another of meiotic abnormalities were found such as univalents, bivalent chains resulting from end-to-end non-homologous achiasmate associations, multiple translocation chains, anaphasic laggards and macrospermatids.

End-to-end non-homologous associations
In males originating from different populations of A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi, end-to-end associations between bivalents were found at different stages of meiosis. The chains, involving up to four bivalents and occasionally (in A. albostriella) also the X-chromosome, were formed during prophase and were still intact at MI. In these cases, the persistent association was certainty non-chiasmate. Non-homologous telomeres did not touch intimately each other but unstained gaps were present between bivalents. Since in both species chromosomes display distal heterochromatic blocks (our unpublished data), one can suggest that the formation of artificial bivalent chains (pseudomultiples) is caused by heterochromatin adhesion due to which non-homologous chromosomes easily attract to one another.
Terminal associations of non-homologous bivalents without chiasma formation have been described in many plants and animals (White 1973, John and King 1982, 1985. These associations may involve from two up to all bivalents of a species. For instance, in the "holokinetic" moth species Sphinx ligustri (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae), all of the 28 bivalents were non-homologously attached to each other throughout prophase until prometaphase in females. Late in meiosis, the chains were broken down sequentially however short chains of two or three bivalents were still present at metaphase I. Like in the two Alebra species, in this moth non-homologous telomeres did not touch intimately each other but an unstained gap or some chromatin threads were seen between bivalents (Nokkala 1987).

Translocation chains
In male 1-WANE sampled from C. sativa, part of nuclei had chains of several bivalents, non-homologous chromosomes showing the apparent intimate contacts by terminal chiasmata (Fig. 3g). In this male, the occurrence of heterozygotes for translocations could account for the multivalent chains formation. Since this chromosome rearrangement was observed only in some of meiotic cells, it must have happened after germi-nal cell development. Unfortunately, using only classical cytogenetic methods it was possible neither to affirm which chromosomes formed the chains nor to identify the orientation of separate chromosomes within a chain. Schematic representation of the possible formation of the chain-of-four caused by multiple translocations in meiotic cells is presented on Fig. 4.
In natural populations, chromosomal rearrangements arise as heterozygotes but their probability to establish is low (King 1993). Interchanges of small terminal segments of chromosomal pairs relatively frequently happen as spontaneous mutations (Hewitt 1979, Reed et al. 1992. Several studies have shown the chiasmate multivalent configurations, either rings or chains, in first meiosis as a result of heterozygosity for chromosomal fissions and fusions (e.g. in orthopterans; White 1973, John 1987, Bidau and Mirol 1988, Mirol and Bidau 1994, Colombo 2013. These configurations can lead to irregular segregation and nondisjunction in meiosis, with a consequent reduction in reproductive potential (White 1973), although sometimes they have no apparent negative influence on fertility (Mirol and Bidau 1994). Regarding insects with holokinetic chromosomes, the rearrangements can be even less deleterious since diffuse kinetochore is spreading through the length of their chromatids and products of rearrangements are able to be transmitted to daughter cells at successive cell divisions. Heterozygous translocations have occasionally been recorded in natural populations of "holokinetic" insects such as aphids (Blackman and Takada 1975, 1977, Blackman et al. 1995, heteropterans (Papeschi 1994, Bressa et al. 1998, Pérez et al. 2004) and ,psyllids (Grozeva andMaryańska-Nadachowska 1995, Nokkala et al. 2006). Within Auchenorrhyncha, a fascinating case of translocation polymorphism was described by Whitten and Taylor (1969) in populations of the Australian leafhopper species A. draba. In all of the 8 studied populations, males showed one of the following chromosome complements: 3AA (three bivalents) + X; 4AA + X; 2AA + 1AAA (trivalent) + X; 1AA + 1AAAA (tetravalent) + X. A peculiar feature of this case is that the reduction in chromosome number has reached different stages in different localities. In one area (Lake Pedder), it was nearly or almost fixed (2 n= 7: 3AA + X), while in another area (Bruny Island) chromosome number decreased from north to south. Reduction of chromosome number following a latitudinal cline was caused by differences in the frequency of chromosome translocations. A. draba was proposed to be under a process of speciation driven by the reorganization of karyotype which was initiated in some populations by the fixation of a particular chromosome fusion (Whitten and Taylor 1969).

Univalents
In separate males of A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi, univalents of one-two chromosome pairs were observed at MI. The univalency involved either one of the larger or one of the smaller pairs of autosomes or occasionally both of these pairs. Although synaptic abnormalities can be responsible for the induction of abnormal chromosome segregation, no abnormal spermatids were observed in males showing univalents at metaphase I cells. This observation suggests a regular segregation of univalents in meiosis as it has been demonstrated by Nokkala (1986) for holokinetic univalents in the true bug species Rhabdomiris striatellus (Fabricius, 1794) (originally listed by Nokkala as Calocoris quadripunctatus (Vil.)) (Miridae, Hemiptera).

Aberrant spermatids
Macrospermatids were encountered in males of both species. Aberrant spermatids occurred in small proportion in part of spermatocysts and were twice and sometimes several times as much as normal spermatids within the same cyst. In A. albostriella, abnormal spermatids were more abundant being found in four populations and in about 37% of the specimens studied. Chromosomal abnormalities that affect gametogenesis are known to be one of the principle causal factors in nonbalanced gametes appearance (White 1973). If the emergence of abnormal spermatids is a reflection of meiotic disturbances, one would expect a correspondence between the amount of macrospermatids and that of meiotic abnormalities in a male. Despite of this, there was a clear discrepancy between these two parameters. Macrospermatids instead of being abundant in males with numerous abnormalities were either occasional or absent and vice versa. For instance, in A. albostriella, out of 15 males displaying macrospermatids, 10 had no evident meiotic abnormalities at diakinesis and MI. Notice however that the fate of abnormal meiotic configurations was not traced in any of the individuals analyzed.

Conclusion
It is not known at this stage what are the primary causes of abnormal chromosome behavior in males of A. albostriella and A. wahlbergi from Greek populations i.e. whether these causes are male-specific meiotic mutants, some environmental mutagens or the result of hybridization events between coexisting species on the same tree. Also it is not known whether these meiotic abnormalities may play a role in the karyotype evolution and speciation of the genus Alebra. This genus seems to be prone to chromosomal rearrangements that makes it an interesting group for further studies. From the cytological viewpoint, a greater number of species and samples as well as more detailed analysis employing special techniques like chromosome bandings and fluorescent in situ hybridization may help in determining the actual variety and frequency of chromosomal abnormalities and their contribution into the karyotype differentiation in the genus Alebra.
the Biosphere and Evolution of Geo-biological Systems", and (for DA and VK) by the FCT research project "Origin of multiple parthenoforms of Empoasca leafhoppers in Madeira Island" (PTDC/BIA-BEC/103411/2008). We thank S. Nokkala for making a valuable contribution to the interactive discussion of the meiotic images and Mss N. Khabazova for technical assistance. We wish to thank Costas Krimbas for laboratory facilities and Sakis Drosopoulos for suggesting chromosome studies on Alebra. We are also grateful to Christos Gantzias for his help in fieldwork and to Planton Andritsakis and Lili Andritsakis for providing sampling facilities.