{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04178537511870845, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02564102564102564, 'mean_word_length': 4.3232323232323235, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Utilizing CIWA-Ar to assess use of benzodiazepines in patients vulnerable to alcohol withdrawal syndrome.

To determine whether use of the revised Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment (CIWA-Ar) would better guide treatment for the Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome (AWS), we prospectively studied 16 patients identified as alcohol dependent or with a positive blood alcohol level on admission. All patients were administered the CIWA-Ar. If it was > or = 10, the patient was randomized to a benzodiazepine. If the CIWA-Ar was < 10, the patient was observed and the CIWA-Ar was administered every eight hours for 48 hours. Of the 35 patients screened, 16 were enrolled. Seven patients had a score of > or = 10 and entered a benzodiazepine treatment program. The mean CIWA-Ar score was 18 +/- 10. The remaining nine patients had an initial CIWA-Ar < 10, with a mean score of 3.8 +/- 2.4. We safely withheld detoxification regimens in 9 of 16 patients based on CIWA-Ar scores. The CIWA-Ar may obviate over-utilization of benzodiazepines in patients with AWS.