{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024864024864024864, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003108003108003108, 'mean_word_length': 4.75, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
IgA Nephropathy in India: What We Do Know

Background: Even though IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is not the most common primary glomerulonephritis (GN) in India, the outcome of patients with IgAN in India is poor when compared with other parts of the world, which is a burden in itself. Methods: Basic and clinical research work in India on primary IgAN was systematically reviewed. Comparisons between data from India and those from other countries were made. Results: IgAN constitutes between 7% and 16% of most biopsy samples from India, bearing in mind these figures may represent only the tip of the iceberg. Nephrotic syndrome and renal failure seem to be common presenting features. The renal survival rates appear to be dismally low. DD genotype of angiotensin-1 converting enzyme (ACE) gene may predispose the individual to IgAN in Indian population. As might be expected, IgAN can recur posttransplant though the posttransplant course is indolent. There are no data on the treatment aspects of IgAN. Conclusion: Low incidence but marked severity characterizes IgAN in India. It is apparent that IgAN seems to have a poor outcome in India. What we are unsure of is the reason behind it. In-depth basic studies and multicenter clinical trials are needed to address this bizarre pattern.