{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022909507445589918, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003436426116838488, 'mean_word_length': 4.329268292682927, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Ideas of Religion: A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Religion

as places where Christians do such work and thereby present the nonChristian world with a dependable image of its own tasks. This view sees work going on not only in the world but in the Church, through its very symbolism and sacrament. In the final analysis, even in Christ we have to get our dependable images from one another. Christ's work in us is, to be sure, dependent work, but we may have less leisure to explore the dimensions of that dependence than R. gives us to believe. Second, depending on how the previous issue is resolved, would the role of the priest have to be revised? Would ordination have to be seen more as giving the priest authority to call Christians to do the work inscribed in their symbols and sacraments? A minor point: the diagrams on p. 201 seem to be reversed.