{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024015369836695485, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01921229586935639, 'mean_word_length': 5.315151515151515, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Forming Limit Curves and Forming Limit Stress Curves for Advanced High Strength Steels

Experimental and numerical investigations using Forming Limit Curve (FLC) and Forming Limit Stress Curve (FLSC) were carried out for two Advanced High Strength Steel (AHSS) grades DP780 and TRIP780. The forming limit curves were experimentally determined by means of Nakazima stretching test. Then, both FLC and FLSC were analytically calculated on the basis of the Marciniack-Kuczinsky (M-K) model. The yield criteria Barlat2000 (Yld2000-2d) were employed in combination with the Swift and modified Voce strain hardening laws to describe plastic flow behavior of the AHS steels. Hereby, influence of the constitutive models on the numerically determined FLCs and FLSCs were examined. Obviously, the forming limit curves predicted by the M-K model applying the Yld2000-2d yield criterion and Swift hardening law could fairly represent the experimental limit curves. The FLSCs resulted from the experimental data and theoretical model were also compared.