{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02537182852143482, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0008748906386701663, 'mean_word_length': 5.320441988950276, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Eliminating transient artifacts in stabilized-image contrast thresholds.

In the measurements of contrast thresholds for stationary, stabilized images, the choice of the psychophysical procedure may profoundly affect the results by constraining the time course of the stimulus presentation. With some procedures, the subject is unable to ignore transients; as a result, he necessarily responds to onset and offset transients rather than to the intended stimulus. Here we report significant effects of (a) the rapidly of onset and (b) the duration of the stimulus on thresholds for stabilized sinusoidal-grating patterns; these effects occur with both forced-choice and standard yes/no procedures. No value of either parameter (a) or (b) can eliminate such presentation effects when these procedures are used. However, we have devised a new, continuous-presentation procedure that yields results that do not depend on these parameters. Contrast thresholds for stabilized and for unstabilized stimuli measured by this procedure differ by 1 log unit or more, in good agreement with the results obtained by careful use of the method of adjustment.