{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03567035670356704, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01845018450184502, 'mean_word_length': 5.120300751879699, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Leftward Movement in Morphology

1.0 Introduction A strong argument in behalf of the abstract nature of fundamental phrasestructure relations emerges if we can demonstrate that structural principles apply both to syntax and lexical morphology. Historically, phrase-structure was first linked to categories ( NP, VP, etc), then to a more abstract X-bar structure, and finally to Featureoriented "bare" structure linked to the properties of words (Chomsky (1995), (1998)). 2 Kayne (1994) briefly suggests that the anti-symmetrical architecture of phrasestructure may operate in the lexicon. We show that it does. The empirical base of this essay lies in the systematic contrast between two kinds of nominal incorporation, leftward outbreak and rightward breakout  . Here is a set of  minimal pairs of various sorts: