{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02665941240478781, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003264417845484222, 'mean_word_length': 5.913533834586466, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bladder distention and pyelectasis in the male fetus: causes, comparisons, and contrasts.

The objective of this paper was to determine if prenatal sonographic findings can accurately differentiate between the causes of bladder distention and pyelectasis in the male fetus. Twenty‐one cases were evaluated for the presence of oligohydramnios, posterior urethral dilation, bladder wall thickening, urachal patency, cortical thinning, cortical cysts, and increased renal echogenicity. Postnatal diagnosis included posterior urethral valves (10 cases), prune belly syndrome (four cases), vesicoureteral reflux (four cases), left ureterovesical junction obstruction (one case), and nonrefluxing, nonobstructive megacystis‐megaureter (two cases). Oligohydramnios was present in eight of 10 cases of posterior urethral valves and in one of four cases of prune belly syndrome. A dilated posterior urethra was noted in seven of 10 cases of posterior urethral valves and transiently in two of four cases of prune belly syndrome. Bladder wall thickening developed in all cases of posterior urethral valves and was noted in two of four patients with prune belly syndrome. A patent urachus likewise was identified in two of four cases of prune belly syndrome. The presence of oligohydramnios, progressive bladder wall thickening, and dilated posterior urethra was most suggestive of posterior urethral valves, whereas the presence of a patent urachus was most suggestive of prune belly syndrome. The presence of pyelectasis and megacystis without additional amniotic fluid, bladder, urethral, or renal abnormalities was most suggestive of vesicoureteral reflux, ureterovesical junction obstruction, or nonrefluxing, nonobstructive megacystis‐megaureter. Owing to the overlap and evolution of these findings, close follow‐up evaluation is recommended.