{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033386327503974564, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012718600953895072, 'mean_word_length': 4.779816513761468, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Logic and Law: A Critical Account of Legal Argument . By Joseph Horovitz. New York and Wien: Springer-Verlag, 1972. Pp.xvi, 213.

The present book, Volume 8 in the Library of Exact Philosophy, is based on Horovitz's doctoral dissertation at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. In it Horovitz examines the views of a number of contemporary theorists on legal reasoning who, with the exception of Ulrich Klug, hold that legal reasoning has a specific property which distinguishes it from logic and its applications generally. More narrowly, Horovitz focuses on the notion that legal reasoning is in some sense "nonformal" in character.