{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022182786157941437, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.324675324675325, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Considering patient narrative-based and medico-scientific epistemologies in framing psychiatric care.

OBJECTIVE
Personal narratives of lived experience with psychiatric illness and distress remain central in the epistemology of mental illness. We provide a commentary on this potential bridging of patient narrative-based epistemology, and medico-scientific epistemology used by psychiatrists used for diagnosis, formulation, prognosis and treatment.


CONCLUSION
Discussion and planning of psychiatric care can be framed by understanding the narrative-based epistemology of a patient's illness as highlighted by five key questions to explore the patient's illness explanatory models. We propose five key questions for the psychiatrist's complementary consideration of medico-scientific epistemology that frame conceptual models of aetiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, formulation, prognosis and treatment, which are embedded in the predominant socio-cultural environment. These questions assist in bridging patient narrative and medico-scientific explanatory models to facilitate more effective collaborative care planning.