{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01715686274509804, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022058823529411766, 'mean_word_length': 5.196969696969697, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison of evoked response audiometry and routine clinical audiometry.

Auditory thresholds were determined by evoked response audiometry (ERA) and by routine clinical audiometry at two frequencies (500 and 2 000 Hz) for 50 adult patients by five audiologists. The differences between ERA results and routine audiometric results in this study suggest caution in the clinical use of data obtained by ERA.