{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027938342967244702, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015414258188824663, 'mean_word_length': 5.040697674418604, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
From my hand to your ear: The faces of meter in performance and perception.

Although much theoretical and experimental study in music cognition has examined the role of meter in perception, less work has examined the role of meter in music performance. On the one hand, many studies have documented that perception of meter may arise from a variety of acoustic cues, and metrically regular patterns allow more accurate perception of and memory for music (eg. Jones & Pfordresher, 1997; Povel, 1981). Such evidence has inspired theories to posit that the perception of meter arises from attention to surface-level periodicities in a sequence that generate expectancies by driving internal rhythmic oscillations (Large & Jones, 1999). Other work has suggested that meter may serve as a well-learned abstract schema that guides listeners' interpretation of strong and weak beats even in the absence of surface cues (Palmer & Krumhansl, 1990); although meter stems from the musical surface, it is not entirely dependent on surface structure.