{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012145748987854251, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.4640522875816995, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Conceptual mapping as a communication tool of legal requirements

Requirements elicitation is a important task for success on project of systems development. It is essential that the development team has tools that assist in communication and negotiation with stakeholders. The Juridical Domain-Specific has a large volume of information and its own peculiar language that can harm the process of communication between the development team and stakeholders. This work investigates the use of concept maps as a tool for conceptual modeling of the juridical domain, considering the complexities and peculiarities of the domain. Two experiments are performed with system developers and legal experts, respectively, to analyze the use of concept maps within this context. As result, there is the concept maps provide better understanding regarding the conceptual legal framework, indicating the feasibility of its use to improve the process for defining requirements for the juridical domain.