{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022026431718061675, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00881057268722467, 'mean_word_length': 5.552884615384615, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Beating mitral valve surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function].

Mitral valve surgery is usually performed under the arrested heart condition. However, cardioplegic arrest techniques will inevitably produce some degree of reperfusion injury. We expected that keeping heart beating decrease the reperfusion injury in patients with poor left ventricular function. The present study compared the results of beating heart technique and conventional mitral valve surgery to demonstrate the merit of this technique. Thirty six patients with low left ventricular function[ ejection fraction (EF)≤35%] who underwent mitral valve surgery between April 2004 and July 2012 were enrolled in this study. On-pump beating mitral valve surgery were performed in 21 patients (beating group). Fifteen patients underwent conventional mitral valve surgery with cardiac arrest using blood cardioplegia (arrest group). Postoperative cardiac events in the beating group were less than that in the arrest group. However, this difference in both groups was not statistically significant. The visual field of the beating heart was equal to that of conventional surgery, and technical accuracy was not compromised. To decrease postoperative cardiac events, beating-heart mitral valve surgery may be suitable surgical option for patients with poor left ventricular function.