{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02338530066815145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.286713286713287, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
EVOLUTION, PHYLOGENY, SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND MATING SYSTEM IN THE GRACKLES (QUISCALUS SPP.: ICTERINAE)

According to theory, two consequences of sexual selection are sexual dimorphism in size and secondary sexual characteristics, due to either intra‐ or intersexual selection. In this paper I suggest three criteria for the test of an evolutionary hypothesis involving quantitative morphological characters. First, the postulated change must be shown to have occurred in evolutionary time. Second, this change must be positively correlated with a change in the proposed selective agent. Third, given two taxa with different degrees of sexual size dimorphism and different mating system, the possible influence of drift must be rejected. If the hypothesis is not rejected by these three criteria, then we still have no proof of causality, but we can at least be more confident about its plausibility.