{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01652892561983471, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.653846153846154, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cortical thickness measurements and photon absorptiometry for determination of bone quantity.

Reproducibility of estimates of cortical bone quantity in the appendicular skeleton by two methods was studied in healthy individuals and patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Repeated measurements of cortical thickness (CT) at the midpoint of the second metacarpal were taken from single radiographs of both hands by two independent observers. Repeated measurements by the same observer were more reproducible and the degree of reproducibility was far greater in healthy subjects than in dialysis patients. Repeated measurements were made of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone width (W) of the distal radius by photon absorptiometry. Repeated BMC/W determinations were highly reproducible in both healthy subjects and dialysis patients. High correlation was found between BMC and cross-sectional cortical area and between both simple cortical thickness and cortical area/width. Thus the photon absorptiometric technique is superior for the serial monitoring of bone quantity, particularly in patients with uremic osteodystrophy, but results obtained by the two methods in group studies should be comparable.