{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02705314009661836, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03768115942028986, 'mean_word_length': 4.7555555555555555, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cellular toxicity of iHAP1 and DT-061 does not occur through PP2A-B56 targeting

PP2A is an abundant phosphoprotein phosphatase that acts as a tumor suppressor. For this reason, compounds able to activate PP2A are attractive anticancer agents. The small molecule compounds iHAP1 and DT-061 have recently been reported by Leonard et al. (2020) and Morita et al. (2020) in Cell to selectively stabilize specific PP2A-B56 complexes which mediate cell killing. Here, we show that this is not the case and question key findings in these papers. Through genome wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens, we uncover the biological pathways targeted by these compounds. We find that iHAP1 directly blocks microtubule assembly both in vitro and in vivo and thus acts as a microtubule poison. In contrast, DT-061 disrupts both the Golgi apparatus and the endoplasmic reticulum and we directly visualize DT-061 in cytoplasmic granules that co-localize with Golgi markers. Our work demonstrates that iHAP1 and DT-061 cannot be used for dissecting PP2A-B56 biology.