{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019514767932489453, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002109704641350211, 'mean_word_length': 5.518900343642612, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Recognizing Radiation-induced Changes in the Central Nervous System: Where to Look and What to Look For.

Radiation therapy (RT) continues to play a central role as an effective therapeutic modality for a variety of tumors and vascular malformations in the central nervous system. Although the planning and delivery techniques of RT have evolved substantially during the past few decades, the structures surrounding the target lesion are inevitably exposed to radiation. A wide variety of radiation-induced changes may be observed at posttreatment imaging, which may be confusing when interpreting images. Histopathologically, radiation can have deleterious effects on the vascular endothelial cells as well as on neuroglial cells and their precursors. In addition, radiation induces oxidative stress and inflammation, leading to a cycle of further cellular toxic effects and tissue damage. On the basis of the time of expression, radiation-induced injury can be divided into three phases: acute, early delayed, and late delayed. Acute and early delayed injuries are usually transient and reversible, whereas late delayed injuries are generally irreversible. The authors provide a comprehensive review of the timeline and expected imaging appearances after RT, including the characteristic imaging features after RT with concomitant chemotherapy. Specific topics discussed are imaging features that help distinguish expected posttreatment changes from recurrent disease, followed by a discussion on the role of advanced imaging techniques. Knowledge of the RT plan, the amount of normal structures included, the location of the target lesion, and the amount of time elapsed since RT is highly important at follow-up imaging, and the reporting radiologist should be able to recognize the characteristic imaging features after RT and differentiate these findings from tumor recurrence. ©RSNA, 2020.