{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016611295681063124, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0033222591362126247, 'mean_word_length': 6.178571428571429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Comparison of residues of glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde in urologic instruments after sterilization in aseptic conditions or in a formaldehyde gas sterilizer].

The aldehyde residues of thermolabile urological instruments, after the formaldehyde sterilization or sterilization in aseptic preparation from a 2% glutaraldehyde solution will be examined and compared. The results are discussed together with experimental toxicologic work from the literature. It is concluded that after sterilization in the 2% glutaraldehyde solution, the glutaraldehyde residues on the experimental materials are safe.