{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020910209102091022, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.029629629629629, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ita Mac Carthy Renaissance Keywords

A tendency to go ‘‘back to basics’’ has become more and more pervasive in the last ten years of Renaissance and early modern studies. This tendency, perhaps the sign of a larger revisionist turn, manifests itself in two vast areas of interest: history and philology. Historians of the period have in the past decade become ever more interested in topics such as the history of the senses, of corporeality, and of material objects, thus revealing a concern with the primal and most immediate categories of perception and aesthetic appreciation of the world. But, philology has reawakened the sense that in order to understand a historical period it is absolutely indispensable to trace words’s meanings at the time and their linguistic development. Ita Mac Carthy’s Renaissance