{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.037641154328732745, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04015056461731493, 'mean_word_length': 5.595041322314049, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Risk Sharing, Vulnerability and the Global Financial Crisis

Tests using Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) unit record data from 2006/2007 to 2010/2011 indicate that Australian households on average insure against idiosyncratic income shocks. For a 10% change in income, non-durable expenditures change by 0.14%, while food expenditures change by 0.05%; both results are statistically insignificant. Non-durable expenditures respond asymmetrically to positive and negative shocks, especially during the Global Financial Crisis, as a 10% income rise results consumption rising by 0.1%, while a 10% income decline results in consumption declining by 0.6%; the latter result is statistically significant. Controlling for risk tolerance heterogeneity yields identical results.