{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03833973451923725, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023953911461491815, 'mean_word_length': 5.357464125080317, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 2, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 2, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Concordance between Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotype and Genotype of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from Healthy Dogs

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, a common commensal canine bacterium, is the main cause of skin infections in dogs and is a potential zoonotic pathogen. The emergence of methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) has compromised the treatment of infections caused by these bacteria. In this study, we compared the phenotypic results obtained by minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) for 67 S. pseudintermedius isolates from the skin of nine healthy dogs versus the genotypic data obtained with Nanopore sequencing. A total of 17 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were detected among the isolates. A good correlation between phenotype and genotype was observed for some antimicrobial classes, such as ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolone), macrolides, or tetracycline. However, for oxacillin (beta-lactam) or aminoglycosides the correlation was low. Two antibiotic resistance genes were located on plasmids integrated in the chromosome, and a third one was in a circular plasmid. To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the correlation between phenotype and genotype regarding antimicrobial resistance of S. pseudintermedius from healthy dogs using Nanopore sequencing technology.


Introduction
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is a common bacteria found in the mucous membranes and skin of dogs. Carriage of S. pseudintermedius in healthy dog populations can range between 46% and 92% [1][2][3]. However, it is also the primary pathogen isolated from clinical canine specimens, especially from pyoderma, otitis externa, and superficial folliculitis. In recent decades, the emergence of methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) has compromised the treatment of these infections in veterinary medicine. Furthermore, in recent years, several studies have reported community-acquired infections with S. pseudintermedius transmitted from dogs to humans directly or by contamination of the household environment [4,5], highlighting their zoonotic potential. As a result, S. pseudintermedius has been identified among the most relevant antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria in the European Union for dogs and cats, and its eligibility to enter the list of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law has been recently discussed [6].
To date, the vast majority of studies have focused on S. pseudintermedius isolated from diseased dogs and have evidenced a high level of resistance to clinically important antimicrobials, such as beta-lactams, lincosamides, and fluoroquinolones [7]. In many cases, the presence of the mecA gene, or its homolog, mecC producing a modified penicillin-binding protein (PBP), provides them with phenotypic resistance to all beta-lactam antimicrobials registered in veterinary medicine, limiting the therapeutic options. Additionally, the global distribution of some sequence types (ST) associated with MRSP causing infections, such as ST71 in Europe and ST68 in North America, have contributed to unravel the epidemiology of this pathogen and identifying lineages of S. pseudintermedius with pathogenic and zoonotic potential [8].
However, to have a broader knowledge of the epidemiology of this opportunistic pathogen and to help veterinarians guide antimicrobial stewardship, it is necessary to study not only isolates associated with clinical cases but also the commensal population inhabiting the skin of healthy dogs. Furthermore, strain diversity within each individual animal has been studied by traditional methods, such as phenotypic tests, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, or PCR, describing high genotypic diversity between different anatomical sites of the animal [9] but not many differences in antimicrobial resistant profiles. Hence, highthroughput sequencing technologies have the advantage of studying complete genomes. In particular, long-read sequencing technologies, such as Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT), offer the advantages of closing genomes and plasmids, enabling establishment of the location and the genetic context of the different antimicrobial resistance genes [10,11]. This facilitates the assessment of the risk of transmission being higher when it is plasmid-borne and has the potential of being horizontally transferred intra and inter-species.
To our knowledge, whole genome sequencing techniques have not been fully applied to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance determinants within S. pseudintermedius of healthy dogs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize genotypically and phenotypically the population of S. pseudintermedius from the skin of different anatomical areas of healthy dogs and to correlate the phenotype with the genotype. Additionally, the location of the different antimicrobial resistant genes and their genetic context have been identified.

Figure 2.
Cooccurrences (%) of the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Seventeen genes were detected within the 67 S. pseudintermedius isolates. blaI and blaR1 are not shown in the figure since they share the same presence as blaZ. The second column (in gray) indicates the number of isolates harboring the gene. The % values are calculated by dividing the number of cooccurrences of two given genes by the number of times a gene is present in our isolates. As an example, all the isolates presenting mecA (40), also present the gene blaZ (100% of cooccurrence); however, only 40 out of the 62 isolates presenting blaZ also present the mecA gene (64.5% of cooccurrence). For all the data and how it is calculated, see Supplementary Table S2. The % values are calculated by dividing the number of cooccurrences of two given genes by the number of times a gene is present in our isolates. As an example, all the isolates presenting mecA (40), also present the gene blaZ (100% of cooccurrence); however, only 40 out of the 62 isolates presenting blaZ also present the mecA gene (64.5% of cooccurrence). For all the data and how it is calculated, see Supplementary Table S2. In general, a good correlation was observed between phenotypic and genotypic results. The concordance between the genotype and the phenotype was higher than 90% for lincosamides, trimethroprim, tetracyclines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and ampicillin (Supplementary Table S3). Penicillin and oxacillin showed a concordance of 88.8% and 85%, respectively. For ceftriaxon this value was 60%. However, aminoglycosides showed only 25% concordance. Moreover, when correlating phenotype and genotype, some inconsistencies were observed (Supplementary Table S3). One isolate (H_SP249, from Dog 6) was phenotypically resistant to tetracycline, but none of the published genes were detected. Another isolate (H_SP283, from Dog 8) exhibited resistance to two antimicrobial families, macrolides and beta-lactams, but in addition to presenting ermB and mecA, some genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides were also present (aad(6) and aph(3 )-IIIa). Finally, six isolates (H_SP255, H_SP258, H_SP260 to H_SP262, and H_SP267) phenotypically susceptible to methicillin harbored the mecA gene.
Bioinformatic analyses detected the presence of two genes that can explain the resistance to these antibiotics: blaZ and mecA. All isolates resistant to penicillin (n = 55) harbored blaZ gene. However, seven extra isolates yielded the whole bla operon, including blaZ, balrR1, and blaI but were phenotypically susceptible to penicillin. The mecA gene was present in 40 isolates (Supplementary Table S4). All of them were resistant to ampicillin; 34 to oxacillin, and 25 to ceftriaxone. Interestingly, all the isolates showing the mecA gene and that were susceptible to both ceftriaxone (n = 15) and oxacillin (n = 6) presented the SCCmec type IVg (2B). When comparing the oxacillin and ceftriaxone MIC values between different SCCmec types, isolates (n = 17) with the type IVg (2B) exhibited MICs ≤1 mg/L and ≤8-16 mg/L, respectively, while the strains harboring the subtype Vc (5C2&5) (n = 8) or with no SCCmec cassette (n = 15) exhibited MIC values for oxacillin and ceftriaxone of >8 mg/L and >64 mg/L, respectively (Supplementary Table S4).

Fluoroquinolone Resistance
Phenotypic resistance to ciprofloxacin was observed in 23 isolates (13 from Dog 1 and 10 from Dog 6) and intermediate in two (Dog 2) (Supplementary Table S1). Mutations in gyrA and parC (also known as grlA) genes have been previously related to fluoroquinolone resistance [12]. Among the 67 S. pseudintermedius isolates, 38-point mutations in the gyrA gene were identified (Supplementary Table S5). Within these point mutations, 17 have been previously described [12], and 21 are described herein. Two of the point mutations described among our strains were specific for all the phenotypic antibiotic-resistant isolates: C251T (Ser84Leu) and G2611A (Glu871Lys). For parC gene, 36 point mutations were found among the 67 isolates, including 11 previously described [12] and 25 that are described herein (Supplementary Table S6). One mutation was specific for all the phenotypic-resistant isolates, G239T (Ser80Ile); however, we described six-point mutations present in 15 of the 23 resistant isolates, and three-point mutations present in three of the resistant strains.

Vancomycin Resistance
One isolate (H_SP204) exhibited resistance to vancomycin (MIC 16 µg/mL), and the MIC for teicoplanin was 16 µg/mL (Supplementary Table S1). None of the van genes conferring resistance to vancomycin were detected. However, mutations in rpoB and clpP genes were also assessed (Supplementary Tables S7 and S8, respectively). Two different mutations were observed for the rpoB gene, encoding the β subunit of RNA polymerase, G742A (Val248Ile) and G3094A (Val1032Ile). Additionally, one mutation C17T (Thr6Ile) in the clpP encoding for an ATP-dependent protease involved in cell wall synthesis was found.

Macrolide and Lincosamide Resistance
A total of 28 isolates were phenotypically co-resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin. However, one isolate was resistant only to erythromycin (H_SP283) and another isolate to clindamycin (H_SP204) (Supplementary Table S1).
All the isolates resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin harbored the ermB gene, except for the clindamycin susceptible isolate. Additionally, five isolates also yielded the lsaE gene along with lnuB. lsaE, and lnuB were located next to each other, with one site-specific recombinase upstream and downstream ( Figure 3).

Tetracycline Resistance
A total of 48 isolates were phenotypically resistant to tetracycline (47 with MICs ≥ 16 µg/mL, and one with MIC 4 µg/mL) (Supplementary Table S1). Genotypically only the isolates with MIC ≥ 16 µg/mL presented a gene related to tetracycline resistance, tetM. Moreover, eight isolates from the same dog presented tetM together with tetK; this last one located in a potential plasmid inserted in the chromosome. tetK was accompanied by the other two genes present in the pSP-G3C4 (MN612109.1) plasmid harboring tetK gene: repC (coverage 71.4% and identity 90.1%) and repC polypeptide A (coverage 99.5% and identity 99.4%).

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (Cotrimoxazole) Resistance
A total of 23 isolates were phenotypically resistant to cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) (Supplementary Table S1). In agreement, the acquired dfrG gene was present in 22 of the 23 resistant isolates (Supplementary Table S3). H_SP238 exhibited resistance to cotrimoxazole, but no related ARG was found.
Mutations in the constitutive gene dhfr were assessed in all isolates (resistant and susceptible), but no specific mutations were detected (Supplementary Table S9). Additionally, point mutations in the folP gene were further investigated. Interestingly, all the resistant strains and half of the susceptible strains (24/44, 54.6%) presented an insertion of 12 nucleotides (AGAGGAAGTCAC, from position 177 to 188), translated into four extra amino acids in the protein sequence (Arg-Gly-Ser-His) (Supplementary Table S10).
The genes aac(6 )-aph(2"), ant(6)-Ia, aph(3 )-IIIa, and spw cooccurred in 96.6% to 100% of the isolates that also present the bla operon, tetM, ermB, and sat-4 ( Figure 2). The spw gene was also present in 100% of the isolates with lsaE, lnuB, and dfrG. str gene only cooccured with the bla operon and tetM. Isolates H_SP285 and H_SP286 (both from the same dog) presented the str gene in a small contig independent from the chromosomal contig. The contig size was 4329 bp for H_SP285 and 4336 bp H_SP286; both were circular, with similar gene content (replicon, mobilization, and hypothetical proteins), and yielded a replicon rep7a_4_repD(pK214), indicating they were potential plasmids ( Figure 4).
lates, four different combinations of aminoglycoside resistance genes were identified (Supplementary Table S2).
Isolates H_SP285 and H_SP286 (both from the same dog) presented the str gene in a small contig independent from the chromosomal contig. The contig size was 4329 bp for H_SP285 and 4336 bp H_SP286; both were circular, with similar gene content (replicon, mobilization, and hypothetical proteins), and yielded a replicon rep7a_4_repD(pK214), indicating they were potential plasmids (Figure 4).

Genes Not Tested Phenotypically: sat-4 and cat
As shown in Supplementary Table S2, a total of 24 isolates presented the gene sat-4 (encoding for a streptothricin acetyltransferase [13]) with coverage and identity values equal or higher than 99% However, five isolates from dog 5 only presented a fragment of this gene (289 bp of 543 bp) located in the negative strand of the chromosome. Analyzing the genetic context of these five isolates (H_SP224 to H_SP228) ( Figure 3) and comparing it to five isolates that presented the complete gene, we observed that in all cases sat-4 is flanked upstream and downstream by aph(3′)-III and ant(6)-I, respectively.
Sixteen isolates harbored a cat gene encoding for a chloramphenicol o-acetyltransferase in the chromosome (Supplementary Table S2). The gene was surrounded by several elements involved in recombination, mobilization, integration, and replication ( Figure 3).

Genes Not Tested Phenotypically: sat-4 and cat
As shown in Supplementary Table S2, a total of 24 isolates presented the gene sat-4 (encoding for a streptothricin acetyltransferase [13]) with coverage and identity values equal or higher than 99% However, five isolates from dog 5 only presented a fragment of this gene (289 bp of 543 bp) located in the negative strand of the chromosome. Analyzing the genetic context of these five isolates (H_SP224 to H_SP228) ( Figure 3) and comparing it to five isolates that presented the complete gene, we observed that in all cases sat-4 is flanked upstream and downstream by aph(3 )-III and ant(6)-I, respectively.
Sixteen isolates harbored a cat gene encoding for a chloramphenicol o-acetyltransferase in the chromosome (Supplementary Table S2). The gene was surrounded by several elements involved in recombination, mobilization, integration, and replication ( Figure 3).

Discussion
In this study, we carried out a comprehensive correlation study between the genotypic and the phenotypic data of 67 S. pseudintermedius isolates obtained from four anatomical regions of nine healthy dogs [14]. Long-read Oxford Nanopore whole genome sequencing was performed with the MinION Mk1C followed by de novo assembling and polishing steps. Different authors have previously studied phenotype and genotype correlations in S. pseudintermedius using Illumina sequencing, [15,16] describing difficulties with regards to assembling the genetic context of the antibiotic resistance genes [15]. Here, we demonstrate that this avantgarde sequencing technology is an excellent tool not only to study the presence of resistance genes but also their genetic context, including insertion sequences (IS) and repeated regions.
The average number of resistances to different antibiotic families varied among the S. pseudintermedius isolates from one dog compared to the other dogs, but generally, the same profile was observed for the same sampled area. The nasal region should be considered a hot spot for the transmission of antibiotic resistance to other specimens since the Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1625 9 of 15 colonization of the nasal region of a dog owner by the same S. pseudintermedius colonizing its dog's nose has already been described [17].
In our previous study [18], all the S. pseudintermedius isolated from the skin of six healthy dogs (n = 22) were methicillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (MSSP), and only two of them were MDR. In contraposition, the present work identified 27 MSSP (40%) and 40 MRSP (60%), 29 of the latter also MDR, identified in five out of the nine healthy dogs. Although the number of dogs is quite limited for performing any statistical test, it appears that the presence of the mecA gene in S. pseudintermedius isolates from healthy dogs is more prevalent than previously thought. Furthermore, a complete mecA gene was confirmed in isolates susceptible to oxacillin and ceftriaxone, which can hinder the therapeutic outcome in case of infection. In this regard, isolates that harbored the SCCmec IVg exhibited lower MIC than those with SCCmec_subtype-Vc(5C2&5) or lacking the cassette, as described by Worthing et al. [19] Therefore, our results confirmed that oxacillin and ceftriaxone susceptibility appears to be associated with the type of SCCmec harbored by the bacterium.
The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp has led to the use of vancomycin as one of the first line antimicrobials to combat Gram positive infections [20,21]. Fortunately, we could not detect any of the vancomycin resistant genes described in the literature. However, mutations in rpoB and clpP can cause reduced susceptibility against vancomycin [15,[22][23][24][25]. We described herein two possible mutations associated with these genes that should be confirmed by more precise sequencing technology. Further analysis, including morphometric studies using electron microscopy and doubling time assays, should be performed as described by Cui et al. [26] to check the cell wall thickness and multiplication rate among this resistant isolate.
One hundred percent concordance between phenotype and genotype was observed for ciprofloxacin. While C251T (Ser84Leu) has been consistently described as a characteristic mutation in the gyrA gene conferring resistance to fluoroquinolones in different Staphylococcus species [12,[27][28][29][30], here we report a novel second mutation that was only present in resistant isolates, G2611A (Glu871Lys). For parC gene, the G239T (Ser80Ile) mutation was only present in resistant isolates.
For erythromycin, 100% concordance was observed between phenotype and genotype, with two discrepancies for clindamycin resistance. Isolate H_SP204 was clindamycin resistant and erythromycin susceptible, and no antibiotic resistance gene was described. On the other hand, isolate H_SP283 presented phenotypic resistance to erythromycin but was susceptible to clindamycin. It is possible that this isolate presented an inducible clindamycin resistance, unlike all the other strains that presented the ermB gene and that were resistant to both erythromycin and clindamycin. It has been described in S. pseudintermedius that the ermB gene can be constitutively or induced expressed [31]. Thus, further experiments with a double-disk diffusion testing both antibiotics should be performed to ensure clindamycin resistance, since clindamycin is one of the predilected antibiotics to use in treatment when resistance to methicillin is present. Interestingly, lsaE and lnuB genes were flanked by one site-specific recombinase (Figure 3), which could denote a previous event of mobilization and integration in the chromosome. In fact, Yan et al. described these genes in a conjugative plasmid in Enterococcus faecium, potentially transmissible to Staphylococcus aureus [32]. These analyses also identified that both genes, lsaE and lnuB were located next to an antibiotic resistance region with ant(6)-I-sat-4-aph(3 )-III clusters [33], as described herein.
As Tyson et al. reported in their study [15] as a limitation, no concordance between phenotype and the presence of resistance genes was observed for aminoglycosides in this study. Moreover, Wegener et al. [16] described that the most usual discrepancies relied on the aac(6 )-Ie-aph(2")-Ia gene. Additionally, the lack of breakpoints for some of the drugs belonging to this antimicrobial family also hampered any possible correlations between genotype and phenotype. Furthermore, several discrepancies between CARD and NCBI databases regarding coverage and gene nomenclature for this antimicrobial class made it very difficult to compare genotypic results between isolates. Still, a cluster of aminoglycoside resistance genes was detected in our isolates, comprising ant(6)-I (also known as aadE), sat-4, and aph(3 )-III with the presence of other genes such as ermB and dfrG and cat [34][35][36]. These clusters are known as Tn5405-like elements and can be found in Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pRE25 [37]. Loeffler and Lloyd [38] showed the rapid evolution of S. pseudintermedius to multidrug resistance through the acquisition of mecA on a staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC), a large transposon (Tn5405-like element) carrying up to five resistance genes, and genome point mutations for fluoroquinolones (gyrA/grlA) and sulfonamide resistance.
Genotypically, only the isolates exhibiting MIC ≥ 16 µg/mL for tetracycline harbored tetM or tetK. On the other hand, isolates with MIC 4 µg/mL (also categorized as resistant) did not present any known genes, although the presence of efflux pumps cannot be disregarded. In previous studies, tetK has been described in small size plasmids [18,39] in contraposition to our isolates that present this gene in the chromosome. According to the genetic context, it is plausible that a pSP-G3C4-like plasmid has been integrated into the chromosome, as previously described for tetK bearing S. aureus pT181 plasmid [40,41]. Similarly, we observed that the cat gene was surrounded by elements associated to plasmids, including a recombinase, a replication initiation protein, and a toxin-antitoxin system (zeta, ζ, and epsilon, ε, respectively). Therefore, it appears that this plasmid has also been integrated into the chromosome. The presence of plasmids carrying a cat gene integrated into the chromosome of methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA isolated from both dogs and humans has been previously reported [34].
Finally, the genetic background encoding resistance for trimethoprim or sulfonamides could not be determined since no correlation could be detected between mutations in the constitutive dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) conferring resistance to trimethoprim [42,43] or dihydropteroate synthase (folP) target of sulfonamides [44].

Bacterial Cultures
The dogs came to the Hospital Clínic Veterinari (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, UAB, Spain) for routine preventive medical interventions (vaccinations, deworming). Prior to vaccination, they were subjected to a general physical examination by a veterinary surgeon, in which no clinical signs or lesions were detected. A total of nine healthy dogs, belonging to different breeds, and without previous records of antimicrobial treatment were selected during a period spanning one month. Samples were obtained by rubbing sterile swabs on four different skin anatomical areas: perinasal, perioral, inguinal, and perianal. These four different skin anatomical sites were chosen to represent different types of microbial habitat within the dog: from a region with fur and mostly dry like the groin (inguinal samples) to mucocutaneous areas like the muzzle (nasal and perioral samples), and the perianal region, close to the gastrointestinal tract [45,46]. Swabs were cultured in blood agar at 37 • C for 24 h. Up to five colonies morphologically compatible with S. pseudintermedius (small silver colonies) were selected and sub-cultured in 3 mL of Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) media at 37 • C for 16 h. A total of 67 S. pseudintermedius isolates were included in this study, as shown in Table 1.

Antibiotic Susceptibility
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays were carried out for 18 antimicrobial compounds, using Sensititre plates (Sensititre, Trek diagnostic Systems Inc., East Grinstead, UK) (Supplementary Table S1). For confirmation of the vancomycin resistant profile, a different Sensititre MIC plate containing vancomycin and teicoplanin was used. Antimicrobial breakpoints were those recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for the Staphylococcus species [47,48]. Multidrug resistant (MDR) isolates were defined for those isolates showing phenotypic resistance to at least three antimicrobials from different classes [49].
Cluster maps were plotted using the seaborn [59] library in Python. The input files were the presence/absence matrix of antimicrobial resistant genes and antimicrobial resistance.

Antibiotic Resistance Bioinformatic Analysis
Genomes were analysed with Abricate [60] (v1.0.1) using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) databases (both updated on 21 December 2021) to determine the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), applying a threshold of identity and coverage ≥95%. Antibiotic resistance associated with point mutations of some specific genes were identified by analyzing individual files, extracting the sequences, and aligning them with BioEdit's [61] (v7.2.5) ClustalW Multiple Alignment tool.
To determine the genetic context of some ARGs, genome sequences were uploaded to the PAThosystems Resource Integration Center (PATRIC) [62] (v3.6.12) and genome annotation was performed online with Rapid Annotation using the Subsystem Technology tool kit (RASTtk) [63] tool. SnapGene Viewer (v5.2.4) (from Insightful Science; available at https://www.snapgene.com/, accessed on 21 October 2022) was used to visualize the annotated GenBank file and to customize the output. MDR isolates were defined as those isolates showing the presence of ARG from at least three different antimicrobial families.
When the mecA gene was present, the Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) was described using SCCmecFinder (v1.2) (from the Center for Genomic Epidemiology of the Technical University of Denmark; available at https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/ services/SCCmecFinder/, accessed on 21 October 2022).

Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the correlation between phenotype and genotype regarding antimicrobial resistance of S. pseudintermedius from healthy dogs using Nanopore long-read whole genome sequencing technology. Even though we were limited by the antimicrobial cutoffs for our species, a good correlation was observed for some antimicrobials, such as ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolone), macrolides, or tetracycline. However, for oxacillin (beta-lactam) or aminoglycosides the correlation was quite low. It is noteworthy that some isolates harbored the mecA gene and were susceptible to oxacillin and/or ceftriaxone, highlighting the importance of using sequencing technology for confirmation of phenotypic results. The presence of the mecA gene and the number of MDR isolates with integrated plasmids in their chromosome emphasizes the importance of monitoring S. pseudintermedius for its zoonotic potential. Since we enrolled nine dogs in our study, future projects will include a broader number of individuals and a broader number of antimicrobials tested. Moreover, we will not only focus on S. pseudintermedius, but also on other Staphylococcus species isolated by culture that were discarded during the isolation steps. Finally, more analyses of the origin of the discrepancies between the phenotype and the genotype will be included.  Table S2: Cooccurrence of the antibiotic resistance genes retrieved by Abricate. Antibiotic resistance genes described by Abricate with CARD and NCBI databases. aac(6')-ah(2"), aac(6')-Ie-aph(2")-Ia; IN, inguinal; PA, perianal; PO, perioral; NA, nasal; spw gene belongs to the ant(9) family of aminoglycoside resistance genes. Twentyfour isolates presented a full-length copy of the sat-4 gene, but we also included five isolates from Dog 5 (in red) that did harbor half of the gene in the same context as the isolates with the full-length gene. In the las row there are the percentages of presence of each gene among the 67 isolates. Supplementary  Table S3: Congruences and discrepancies between the genotype and the phenotype. In the last row are calculated the concordances in percentages. * C251T and G2611A described in gyrA gene and G239T in parC gene; ** from all the antibiotic resistance genes for aminoglycosides described only aac(6)-aph(2) confers resistance to gentamicin. Supplementary Table S4: All the strains that presented de mecA gene. Here we describe which SCCmec are presented and their MICs for oxacillin (OXA) and ceftriaxone (AXO). The SCCmec percentage is given by the tool we used to determine the presence of SCCmec, the SCCmecFinder. Supplementary Table S5  Data Availability Statement: The genome assemblies and genomic data [14] are publicly available in GeneBank, BioProject PRJNA685966, genome accession numbers CP083183 to CP083231; CP085723, CP085724 and JAJEKF000000000 to JAJEKU000000000. The raw data are available from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), BioProject PRJNA685966.