{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017632241813602016, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.463414634146342, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Logic of Compromise in Mexico: How the Countryside Was Key to the Emergence of Authoritarianism by Gladys I. McCormick (review)

Images of the exploitation and violence committed against rural communities are very powerful for anyone learning about the Mexican Revolution. Despite claims made for decades by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) that democracy and social justice had replaced the authoritarianism and injustices that caused the revolution, Mexicans increasingly disbelieved. Protests against the authoritarian nature of the one-party state grew as the twentieth century advanced. Regardless, most Mexicans knew little about these instances of defiance because the state was able to divide and co-opt protest groups and manipulate the media into looking the other way.