{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026025584472871635, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014556682840758712, 'mean_word_length': 5.75, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 5, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The comparison of laparoscopic and microsurgical varicocoelectomy in infertile men with varicocoele on paternity rate 12 months after surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

The best surgical approach for varicocoelectomy is still unknown, however more and more physicians favour subinguinal microsurgery. The aim of this study was to find whether microsurgical approach is superior to laparoscopic varicocoelectomy in terms of pregnancy rate, fertility potential, endocrinological function of the testis, erectile dysfunction and testicle volume increase. It was a prospective, non‐masked, parallel‐group randomized controlled trial with one to one allocation. It was conducted at authors’ institution and designed as per protocol study. From 2012 till 2015 84 patients were randomly allocated to two groups. First group consisted of 42 patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocoelectomy, whereas patients from the second group underwent microsurgical varicocoelectomy. The indications for varicocoelectomy consisted of infertility >1 year, palpable left‐sided varicocoele and at least one impaired semen parameter (sperm concentration <15 mln/mL; total motility<40%; progressive motility <32%, vitality <58% or normal morphology <4%). The primary goal was to show superiority of microsurgical varicocoelectomy over laparoscopic varicocoelectomy in terms of pregnancy rate. The secondary endpoints comprised assessment of sperm parameters in three‐month intervals after intervention until one year. Other points included, LH, FSH and testosterone levels as well as testicle volume and International Index of Erectile Function. From each group five patients were lost during the follow‐up period. The primary endpoint was not achieved – pregnancy rate in first and second group was 29.7% and 40.5% respectively (p = 0.34). Analysis of the sperm parameters after surgery revealed significant statistical difference in total motility, progressive motility and morphology in favour of microsurgical approach. Both methods showed improvement in all sperm parameters. There were no differences in hormonal levels as well as in erectile function and testicle volume between groups. Small number of patients in both groups are the main limitation of our study.