{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033366045142296366, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019136408243375858, 'mean_word_length': 5.141566265060241, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Optimal Load Magnitude and Placement for Peak Power Production in a Vertical Jump: A Segmental Contribution Analysis

Abstract Bordelon, NM, Jones, DH, Sweeney, KM, Davis, DJ, Critchley, ML, Rochelle, LE, George, AC, and Dai, B. Optimal load magnitude and placement for peak power production in a vertical jump: A segmental contribution analysis. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 911–919, 2022—Weighted jumps are widely used in power training, however, there are discrepancies regarding which loading optimizes peak jump power. The purpose was to quantify the effects of load magnitudes and placements on the force, velocity, and power production in a countermovement vertical jump. Sixteen male and 15 female subjects performed vertical jumps in 7 conditions: no external load, 10 and 20% dumbbell loads, 10 and 20% vest loads, and 10 and 20% barbell loads with load percentages relative to body weight. Arm swing was encouraged for all, but the barbell load conditions. Kinematics were collected to quantify the whole-body (the person and external loads) forces, velocities, and power as well as segments' contributions to the whole-body forces and velocities. Repeated-measure analyses of variance were performed followed by paired comparisons. Jump heights were the greatest for the no external load and 10% dumbbell conditions. The 10 and 20% dumbbell conditions demonstrated the greatest peak whole-body power, while the 2 barbell conditions showed the lowest peak whole-body power. At the time of peak whole-body power, the 2 dumbbell and 2 vest conditions resulted in greater whole-body forces. Whole-body velocities were the greatest for the no external load and 10% dumbbell conditions. Holding the dumbbells in the hands magnified the effects of external loads in producing forces and velocities. The constraint of arm movements in the barbell conditions limited power production. These findings highlight the importance of load placement and arm swing in identifying the optimal configuration for power production in weighted jumps.