{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028688524590163935, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.269230769230769, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Is the concept of resilience useful or suitable?].

Having reminded various models of the concept of resilience, the author investigates this concept towards the psychoanalysis (via the concepts of maternal dreaming capacity, psychic bisexuality and malleability), and the attachment theory. Whatever is the theory to which we refer, two questions raise: what is the genetic part of the part acquired in utero of resilience, and what is the part able to report interpersonal differences.