{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028971511347175277, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023660067600193145, 'mean_word_length': 4.723756906077348, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Anatomic Indications for Using Actuator-driven Pulsed Water Jet for Hepatectomy

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: The clamp crushing method and the use of the Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) are widely accepted techniques for hepatic parenchymal transection. The actuator-driven pulsed water jet (ADPJ) with high tissue selectivity is a new technology that was shown as a safe transection tool in preclinical models, although not much is known about its safety criteria in patients. Therefore, its strongest advantage, the best indications for its use, and its performance in comparison with other transection methods remain to be clarified. In this report, we present several representative cases to help answer these questions. Methods: We started using the ADPJ in December 2017, only in cases where the tumor was very close to major vessels or attached to them, along a considerable length, to preserve vessels and prevent postoperative liver failure. All the cases underwent highly demanding procedures. We avoided using this device in cases such as liver cirrhosis, where the hepatic parenchyma was very hard. Results: Six cases fulfilled our limited indications for using ADPJ. The median age and number of tumors were 55 years (10 to 69 y) and 2.5 years (1 to 4 y), respectively. The mean tumor size was 7.8 cm (2.8 to 21 cm), the minimum distance between the tumor and major vessels to be preserved was 0 mm (0 to 4 mm), and the contact length of the tumor and major vessels was 26 mm (19 to 40 mm). Regarding the surgical outcome, the median operation time and blood loss were 559 minutes (508 to 919 min) and 620 mL (230 to 860 mL), respectively. We achieved a negative surgical margin (R0 resection) in all cases. Conclusions: Using ADPJ, we could perform R0 hepatectomy in all cases, which preoperatively were considered to have a high chance of being margin positive. We consider the best indication for using ADPJ is when the tumor and vessels to be preserved are attached or very close over a long distance.