{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025906735751295335, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012953367875647668, 'mean_word_length': 4.768656716417911, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Relationships Among Cloze, Associational Fluency, and the Removal of Information Procedure—a Validity Study

verse strategy: subjects are asked to delete that word in every five-word segment that has the lowest probability of being filled in correctly by other subjects presented with the mutilated passage. For each word in a RIP-task the probability that it would be guessed correctly if deleted is calculated a priori. This is done by presenting the RIP-passage as five subsequent 20 per cent cloze tasks to different groups of subjects. Thus, for each word in the passage the probability of a correct fill-in is known. A student’s RIP-score is usually obtained by calculating the mean fill-in probabilities of the specific words deleted by him (Tuinman, 1970-1971.