{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.00723589001447178, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.178571428571429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Request for Clarification

It seems to me that secondary urban genesis is a phenomenon in which cultural forms are transmitted through trade and religious interaction systems to societies which have reached the requisite levels of economics and social differentiation and specialization to have an interest in these forms. At the same time they have a well developed local subsistence base. Wheatley and See's study brings out the important fact that secondary urban genesis directs our attention to the dynamics of the secondary urban center rather than dictating a preoccupation with the elements of high culture which are diffused, since their quality is transformed in the new context.