{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03445229681978799, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0017667844522968198, 'mean_word_length': 5.026595744680851, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 1, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Biblical Criticism in Crisis? The Impact of the Canonical Approach on Old Testament Studies

of Ρ as such. Indeed, the richness of theological imagination found in the various traditions that are woven together to form Exodus is hardly addressed: the final redactor's perspective is what is in focus. One might question the use of the "chaos/cosmos" typology in the understanding of creation: it has a 19th-century ring. Many of F.s concerns—transcendence/immanence, freedom/obedience, divine sov­ ereignty/human agency—seem to some extent to be imported from the realm of systematic theology; whether the biblical text is intended to correspond to these concerns, or whether they come from a rather different thought world, would make for an interesting discussion. Finally, readers should be aware of the ambiguity of the expression "creation theology": the term means very different things in different theological circles. F. seems to adopt the practice of avoiding personal pronouns for God, which leads to awkward constructions. The eight times pronouns do occur, however, it turns out that God is "he" after all.