{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031868131868131866, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01098901098901099, 'mean_word_length': 6.007692307692308, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An Evaluation of Bagging, Boosting, and Random Forests for Land-Cover Classification in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA

The iterative and convergent nature of ensemble learning algorithms provides potential for improving classification of complex landscapes. This study performs land-cover classification in a heterogeneous Massachusetts landscape by comparing three ensemble learning techniques (bagging, boosting, and random forests) and a non-ensemble learning algorithm (classification trees) using multiple criteria related to algorithm and training data characteristics. The ensemble learning algorithms had comparably high accuracy (Kappa range: 0.76-0.78), which was 11% higher than that of classification trees. Ensemble learning techniques were not influenced by calibration data variability, were robust to one-fifth calibration data noise, and insensitive to a 50% reduction in calibration data size.