{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0160857908847185, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.277310924369748, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Necessary and Sufficient in Different Domains of Argument: McWherter on Bhaskar on Kant

In the following essay I set out the substantive content of Dustin McWherter's recent book The Problem of Critical Ontology, and I then consider the significance of this work as a form of constructive critique of Bhaskar in relation to Kant (as an approach to critical philosophy). This allows us to then make some general comments on the way constructive critique can be read in different ways, indicating different forms of ultimately reconcilable necessity and sufficiency (idiosyncratically considered) in different domains of argument. In so doing, I also consider some problems of epistemology and the issue of whether partial ignorance is acceptable.