{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04148278905560459, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019417475728155338, 'mean_word_length': 4.785714285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of d-amphetamine, diazepam and buspirone on schedule-induced polydipsia suppressed by response-dependent and response-independent shock.

Food deprived Wistar rats were exposed to a fixed time 60 s food schedule until they developed schedule-induced polydipsia. Rats were matched in pairs according to their licking rate, being designated experimental or yoked control at random. Every fifth lick by experimental rats was then followed by an electric shock (0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mA) while the food schedule continued in operation. Yoked-control rats received the same shocks as experimental rats, but independently of their own licking. Drugs were then tested on the suppressed rates of licking. Diazepam (0.5-2.0 mg/kg) increased punished schedule-induced polydipsia, a result not observed in yoked controls. No increases in the licks per minute of experimental or control animals were found after d-amphetamine (0.25-4.0 mg/kg) or buspirone (0.5-8.0 mg/kg). In comparison with previous results it is concluded that the antipunishment effects of drugs on schedule-induced behaviour depend on the type of punishment contingency.