{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019036954087346025, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0022396416573348264, 'mean_word_length': 5.824427480916031, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison between face‐to‐face and remote language assessment with the Minilinguistic State Examination

The COVID‐19 pandemic had an impact on neuropsychological assessment and implied an adjustment in the settings of evaluation. To continue providing clinical assistance to patients, it was necessary to adapt previously developed tools for face‐to‐face evaluation for a remote format. To know the effectiveness of this way of administration, it becomes necessary to identify whether this new modality differs significantly from the face‐to‐face one. With the pandemia some researcher started to make this comparisons. Identify these possible differences using short tools makes it easy to access this information. The Minilinguistic State Examination (MLSE) is a recently developed tool for assessing acquired language difficulties that is being adapted and validated in various languages.