{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02158828064764842, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009252120277563608, 'mean_word_length': 5.555555555555555, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Metabolic evaluation: is there really a future?

Purpose of review To confirm the need for a metabolic evaluation in stone formers based on the latest information published in the last 24 months and in the current 2022 American and European urological guidelines. Recent findings Recent studies suggest that urolithiasis prevalence has been increasing since 1990. Along with it, metabolic abnormalities that contribute to the development of kidney stones are also increasing, such as hyperuricosuria, hyperoxaluria, hypocitraturia, hypomagnesuria, hypocalciuria, hypophosphaturia, and hyperuricemia. Those abnormalities can only be detected through a metabolic evaluation in patients with stone disease. Summary It is important for us, urologists, to have in mind the actual stone prevalence worldwide. As part of our initial evaluation of the patient with urolithiasis, we must not forget to perform the basic metabolic analysis and, according to the patient's risk classification, continue with a deep metabolic analysis. This extensive analysis includes blood and urine tests. The urinalysis covers 24-h urinalysis, and it would be accurate to also have an early fresh urine analysis. Moreover, identifying the stone type is intimately correlated with the search for other metabolic parameters.