{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022326674500587545, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01762632197414806, 'mean_word_length': 5.870967741935484, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Lessons in risk‐ versus resilience‐based design and management

The implications of recent catastrophic disasters, including the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident, reach well beyond the immediate, direct environmental and human health risks. In a complex coupled system, disruptions from natural disasters and man‐made accidents can quickly propagate through a complex chain of networks to cause unpredictable failures in other economic or social networks and other parts of the world. Recent disasters have revealed the inadequacy of a classical risk management approach. This study calls for a new resilience‐based design and management paradigm that draws upon the ecological analogues of diversity and adaptation in response to low‐probability and high‐consequence disruptions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2011;7:396–399. © 2011 SETAC