{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05263157894736842, 'fraction_numerical': 0.06030701754385965, 'mean_word_length': 5.006578947368421, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Value of celioscopy in non-traumatic acute abdomen].

The diagnostic and therapeutic value of laparoscopy in emergency was studied in 314 patients presenting with non-traumatic acute abdomen. Laparoscopy gave a correct and complete diagnosis of the underlying disease in 92% (290/314) of cases. An erroneous preoperative diagnosis was corrected by laparoscopy in 18% (58/314) of cases. This implied a change of the therapeutic strategy in 9% (27/314). Seventy five per cent (234/314) of patients were exclusively treated by laparoscopy, 22% (68/314) by laparotomy and 3% (11/314) by laparoscopically assisted surgery. Mortality was 2.5% (8/314) and morbidity 9% (29/314). In conclusion, laparoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool for the surgeon in the context of acute abdomen and is an interesting therapeutic alternative in selected cases. However, it requires extensive experience in laparoscopic techniques.