{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01703800786369594, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01310615989515072, 'mean_word_length': 5.2073170731707314, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Minimum sample size and sampling time requirements for assessment of rifampicin bioequivalence from FDC formulations.

SETTING
The WHO- and IUATLD-recommended protocol for rifampicin (RMP) bioequivalence utilises 20-22 volunteers and 8 h, whereas the requirement of other regulatory authorities is 12 volunteers with a 24 h sampling schedule. Differing sampling size and time requirements may change the outcome of RMP bioequivalence.


OBJECTIVE
To determine the minimal sample size and time required to assess RMP bioequivalence from FDC formulations.


DESIGN
Bioequivalence studies were conducted that fulfilled the criteria of the WHO and Indian regulatory protocols. From earlier studies, retrospective pharmacokinetic evaluation, power of the test and bioequivalence limits were also calculated using 8-22 volunteers and sampling points of 8-24 h. Pharmacokinetic and statistical evaluations from three representative studies showing low, moderate and high intra-subject variability are given to determine minimum requirements for RMP bioequivalence.


RESULT
It was found that a sampling schedule up to 8 h was sufficient to compare the absorption process of RMP. There was no influence of reduced sample size on bioequivalence estimates of RMP that showed low or moderate variability. However, in a study showing higher variation, a sample size of 14-16 subjects was found to be optimal.


CONCLUSION
It is possible to reduce the sample size requirement for determination of RMP bioequivalence using the WHO protocol.