{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019438444924406047, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0010799136069114472, 'mean_word_length': 5.393103448275862, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Unexpected Performance of Intel® Optane™ DC Persistent Memory

We evaluated Intel® OptaneTM DC Persistent Memory and found that Intel's persistent memory is highly sensitive to data locality, size, and access patterns, which becomes clearer by optimizing both virtual memory page size and data layout for locality. Using the Polybench high-performance computing benchmark suite and controlling for mapped page size, we evaluate persistent meemory (PMEM) performance relative to DRAM. In particular, the Linux PMEM support maps preferentially maps persistent memory in large pages while always mapping DRAM to small pages. We observed using large pages for PMEM and small pages for DRAM can create a 5x difference in performance, dwarfing other effects discussed in the literature. We found PMEM performance comparable to DRAM performance for the majority of tests when controlled for page size and optimized for data locality.