{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023316062176165803, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02936096718480138, 'mean_word_length': 5.036458333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Detection Methods for Legionella Species in Environmental Water by Colony Isolation, Fluorescent Antibody Staining, and Polymerase Chain Reaction

Three detection methods for Legionella species in water samples from cooling towers and a river were examined. Direct counting of bacteria stained with fluorescent antibody (FA) for L. pneumophila (serogroups 1 to 6) could detect the cell of 104 to 106 cell/100 ml in all 14 samples, while colony counting method detected 10 to 103 CFU/100 ml only in 8 samples from cooling towers. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay with primers to amplify 16S ribosomal DNA sequence of most Legionella species (LEG primer) detected legionellae in 13 samples, while species‐specific primers for L. pneumophila detected the DNAs from 3 samples. In laboratory examination, LEG primers could amplify DNAs of 29 species of genus Legionella with high sensitivity, even from 1 cell of L. pneumophila GIFU 9134. The PCR assay with LEG primers was specific and sensitive methods to be satisfied the survey of legionellae. Thus, PCR assay is a suitable method to detect and monitor Legionella species in an environment.