{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030456269394322492, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01402137685323526, 'mean_word_length': 5.23352435530086, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 1, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Massive Traumatic Subcutaneous Emphysema

Acta Medica (Hradec Králové) 2020; 63(4): 194–197 https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2020.63 © 2020 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Massive Traumatic Subcutaneous Emphysema


INTRODUCTION
Subcutaneous emphysema is often nothing more serious than a cosmetic problem (1,2). Although it can be extremely uncomfortable for the patient, even when it is severe, subcutaneous emphysema rarely has pathophysiologic consequences (1,2). The widely employed methods of therapy, which include placing chest tubes or lacerating the skin on the anterior chest, are time-consuming and uncomfortable (1,2).
Here, we report a case of extensive subcutaneous emphysema following trauma, treated with an easily constructed fenestrated venous catheter.

CASE REPORT
We report a case of a 74-year-old man admitted to the hospital with extensive subcutaneous emphysema. He had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD grade 4, group D, with emphysema component, treated in a pulmonary rehabilitation program, on oxygen therapy and nocturnal bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) ventilation. Other past medical history included arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, epilepsy and was a former smoker.
He had a traumatic rib fracture (5-11th right ribs) during the night after falling from his own height and hitting the ground with his right hemithorax region. After that he went to sleep maintaining BiPAP ventilation until morning. In the morning after, he was admitted at emergency room with a diffuse and massive emphysema on his face, thorax and abdominal regions.
On physical examination, the patient presented a massive swelling and crepitation on palpation. His blood pressure was 107/83 mmHg, pulse rate of 100/min and regular, SpO2 100% with FiO2 100% and axillary temperature of 36 °C. Pulmonary and cardiac auscultation were difficult to assess due to massive emphysema.
Arterial blood gas analysis revealed type II respiratory failure; and electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm, with global low voltage. Complete blood count, liver and renal function tests were normal. Chest computed tomography scan confirmed a diffuse subcutaneous emphysema and showed mediastinal emphysema and bilateral small pneumothorax ( Figure 1).
He was transferred to the intermediate care unit for clinical surveillance and close monitoring.
A fast resolution of the emphysema was required as the patient was severely agitated due to bilateral ocular opening impairment and the need to reintroduce BiPAP ventilation as soon as possible. Hence, under local anesthesia and antiseptic measures, a Redon catheter (12 French, B.Braun) was inserted on left hemithorax, insertion point located 4th next to left side of sternum. The catheter was placed using the Seldinger's technique: the subcutaneous left hemithorax was punctured through a blunt dissection with a sharp hollow needle; a guidewire is then advanced through the lumen of the needle, and the needle is withdrawn; finally the catheter was insert and the guidewire was withdrawn. Then, it was fixed to the skin with 2/0 silk and adapted to drain bags. On the right hemithorax, a subcutaneous ostomy with about 1cm, was performed for comparative purpose ( Figure 2). Afterwards, it was performed a compressive massage in a centripetal fashion, towards drainage orifices, with immediate improvement of emphysema. This had led to a significant improvement with progressive ocular opening over the next hour. Conservative treatment with oxygen and inhalers were continued. The swelling decreased substantially and BiPAP ventilation was discontinued on the basis of the results of arterial blood gas analysis and following case discussion with pulmonology team. During the stay at intermediated care unit, the patient developed a nosocomial pneumonia managed with empirical antibiotic therapy -piperacillin-tazobactam. No other major intercurrence was described. Patient was transferred from intermediated care unit to medical ward at day 5, after further emphysema absorption.
The subcutaneous venous catheter was removed without any signs of inflammatory reaction 9 days later. The treatment for nosocomial pneumonia was completed. The patient was discharged home with complete symptoms resolution.
Subcutaneous emphysema often presents a therapeutic dilemma (1,2). Patients with severe SE may develop dysphagia or vision problems because of periorbital swelling, just like in this case (1,2). More severe complications have been rarely reported, which include respiratory failure, pacemaker malfunction, airway compromise, and tension phenomena (1,2).
A number of techniques have been employed to treat subcutaneous emphysema (2, 6-10). These include infraclavicular incisions, placement of additional chest tubes either in the intrapleural space or subcutaneously, tracheostomy, and large-bore subcutaneous drains with or without suction (2,(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). In this patient two techniques were used: on the right side an infraclavicular incision was performed and on the left side a subcutaneous catheter was placed. The latter equipment is widely available and easily modified, minimally invasive, it is simple to insert, maintain and is effective, painless, does not require suction, and is less likely to produce a scar (2, 6-10). We have not found any significant difference between the two techniques used in this patient, but we consider infraclavicular incision to be a best suited technique due to its simplicity and associated with a lesser risk of infection.
A key step in this process is to increase the interstitial hydrostatic pressure by sequential massage from the face downwards and arm upwards towards the catheter, that should be done 3 to 4 times per day (6). The resolution of emphysema after the catheter placement started only after the above step (6).
To confirm the adequacy of the compressive massage, Srinivas R et al. suggested the placement of an underwater trap and visualization of bubbling as endpoints for adequate compressive massage (6).
Suri JC, Ray A et al., reported in a case report that resolution of swelling was noticed after 8 hours and the catheter was removed after 24 hours (2). According to these authors, this technique ensured an earlier resolution compared to previous reports (where the median time of improvement was 3.7 days) (2). This can be attributed to clear identification of goal to be attained by compressive massages or the sealing of air-leak concurrent to catheter insertion. Other ancillary adjuncts like adequate analgesia, cough suppression and supplemental oxygen therapy may have hastened recovery (2). In the timing of resolution, we should take in account the presence of other mechanism that could perpetuate the emphysema, as for example an ongoing leak of air or significant lung collapse. In these cases, the closure of a fistula or treatment of pneumothorax with thoracic drains should be also applied. Although no studies have yet documented for how long the catheter works, Leo F et al. defends no longer than 3 days (9). Usually, at the time of removal, the catheter is obstructed by clots and dislodged by the movements of the subcutaneous and muscular planes (9).
In the present case a significant reduction of emphysema was noted after the first massage, so we believe that the first massage done with repetitive and vigorous movements is essential for the recovery.
Although we have not experienced any problems with the catheter described here, there are two potential problems (1-2). The first one is infection but, as long as a rigorous asepsis is maintained during placement of the catheter, it is not higher than the risk of infection for central venous catheters (9); and the second is that the catheter may become blocked with blood (1-2).
In conclusion, extensive subcutaneous emphysema can be associated with extreme discomfort, anxiety, longer hospital stays and respiratory failure. Fenestrated catheters are simple to insert and maintain, and the procedure is effective, painless, minimally invasive and infrequently complicated by infection. We did not find any difference between this technique and infraclavicular incision, but we defend the use of infraclavicular incision because it is easier to perform, less expensive, and associated with a lower number of infections. The key step is to increase the interstitial hydrostatic pressure by sequential massage.