{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022779043280182234, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004555808656036446, 'mean_word_length': 5.285714285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Verification: what works and what doesn't

Today's leading chip and system companies are faced with ever increasing design verification challenges; industry studies reveal that as much as 50% of the total schedule is being spent in verification. Large companies, with almost infinite resources, have shown that throwing CPU cycles and people at the simulation problem still doesn't guarantee a level of coverage desired by the design team.