{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016166281755196306, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.6692307692307695, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sensitivity of protein rigidity analysis to small structural variations: a large-scale comparative analysis

Rigidity analysis using the "pebble game" can usefully be applied to protein crystal structures to obtain information on protein folding, assembly and the structure-function relationship. However, previous work using this technique has not made clear how sensitive rigidity analysis is to small structural variations. We present a comparative study in which rigidity analysis is applied to multiple structures, derived from different organisms and different conditions of crystallisation, for each of several different proteins. We find that rigidity analysis is best used as a comparative tool to highlight the effects of structural variation. Our use of multiple protein structures brings out a previously unnoticed peculiarity in the rigidity of trypsin.