{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021669341894060994, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002407704654895666, 'mean_word_length': 5.173267326732673, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data.

Confidence intervals and hypothesis tests are developed for dose-response relations based on dichotomous data from animal carcinogenicity experiments. The functional form of the dose-response curve comes from the Armitage-Doll multistage carcinogenesis model and involves a polynomial in the dose-rate, with non-negative coefficients. Asymptotic distributions of the maximum likelihood estimators of these coefficients are used to construct confidence bounds on risk at a given dose and on the dose corresponding to a given risk. Likelihood ratio tests are developed for the presence of a positive dose-related effect and for the existence of a positive slope to the dose-response curve at zero dose. The latter test is of practical importance since a positive slope of the dose-response curve at zero dose rules out any "threshold-like" behavior and would often mean that any concentration low enough to insure a negligibly low cancer risk (e.g., 10(-6)) would be too low to be economically useful for applications such as food additives. Simulation experiments are performed to provide guidelines for applying the theory.