{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025880661394680086, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018691588785046728, 'mean_word_length': 5.052173913043478, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Benefit of Repeat Multiple Sleep Latency Testing in Confirming a Possible Narcolepsy Diagnosis

Purpose The clinical diagnosis of narcolepsy is usually uncomplicated in the presence of cataplexy. Objective testing is more important in ambiguous disease. The gold-standard objective test in these cases is the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). Repeat testing can be burdensome but is reasonable when faced with a diagnostic dilemma. However, there is limited evidence to support this approach. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic utility of a repeat MSLT in patients suspected of narcolepsy whose first MSLT result was nonconfirmatory. Methods Of 125 patients who underwent an MSLT between 2004 and 2009, we identified 10 (9.6%) who had undergone repeat studies. We analyzed changes in MSLT parameters while taking account of other relevant differences between testing. Results Two patients (20%) met narcolepsy criteria during the second MSLT. Nine patients (90%) met sleepiness criteria (mean sleep latency <8 minutes) during the second MSLT while only 5 did during the first (P = 0.05). Conclusions We demonstrate that a repeat MSLT confirmed the diagnosis of narcolepsy in 20% of patients whose results had been nonconfirmatory on a first MSLT. This study provides support for a repeat MSLT in cases where clinical suspicion for narcolepsy is high despite an ambiguous first test.