{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.048226164079822616, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04711751662971175, 'mean_word_length': 4.766773162939297, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstract 1122‐000022: Delays in Care for Patients with Acute Stroke During Hospitalization for Other Reasons


 Introduction
 : In‐hospital stroke (IHS) is defined as stroke that occurs during hospitalization for non‐stroke conditions. We aimed to understand the timing of symptom recognition for patients who experienced IHS and its impact on the care they receive.
 
 
 Methods
 : A prospective, single center registry of adult patients (9/20/19‐2/28/21) was queried for acute anterior circulation IHS. Indications for hospitalization, delays from last known well (LKW) to symptom recognition, imaging, and treatment were explored.
 
 
 Results
 : Of 928 consecutively evaluated adults with acute stroke, 85 (9%) developed an anterior circulation IHS, 39 (46%) of whom were female, with a median age of 67 years (IQR 60–76) and median NIHSS of 15 (IQR 4–22). Sixty‐eight (80%) had a >1 hour delay from last known well to symptom recognition. Two patients (2%) received IV thrombolysis, although another 38 (45%) would have been eligible if not for a delay in symptom recognition. An ICA, M1, or M2 occlusion was observed in 18 patients (21%), 7 of whom were treated at a median of 174 minutes after LKW (IQR 65–219). Compared to the 11 patients who did not undergo thrombectomy with large vessel occlusion, those who underwent thrombectomy had non‐significantly shorter delays from LKW until neuroimaging (median 85 [IQR 65‐162] vs. 216 [IQR 133‐507], p = 0.12).
 
 
 Conclusions
 : While uncommon, patients with IHS experience delays in symptom recognition and treatment, which lead to exclusion from acute care treatment such as thrombolysis and thrombectomy. Earlier detection with more frequent nursing assessments or advanced neuromonitoring devices in at‐risk patients may reduce delays in care.
