{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019674935842600515, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003421727972626176, 'mean_word_length': 6.048192771084337, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Clinician's Guide to Research Article Titles

Like many clinical disciplines, a major goal of occupational therapy research is to improve clinical practice. This goal presents a unique challenge to occupational therapists. Specifically, researchers and clinicians must communicate about research and its implications to improve practice through professional publications. This means that writers must effectively present their work and readers must effectively critique it. This need to bridge a communication gap in reporting and critiquing research occurs in many practitioner-oriented fields. Researchers suggest that research writing must shift from an emphasis on statistical analysis, and theoretical and methodological considerations to greater emphasis on clinical practice (Tornquist, Funk, & Champagne, 1989). They contend that bridging the communication gap to reach clinicians may be accomplished by providing clear presentations of interventions, instruments, and results with their implications in clinical practice. Currently, many occupational therapy practitioners apply research findings from journals and conferences to improve their practice. Oth-