{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028949545078577336, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.612021857923497, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
CHIVA, ASVAL and related techniques – Concepts and evidence

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a highly prevalent condition with significant effects on patients’ quality of life. Despite this, the underlying pathophysiology of venous disease still remains unclear. Two schools of thought exist, explaining the development and propagation of venous disease as an “ascending” and “descending” process, respectively. The descending theory, stating that CVD is secondary to proximal disease (e.g. saphenofemoral/saphenous incompetence), is the most widely accepted when planning treatment aiming to remove or destroy the junction or truncal veins. The ascending theory, describing the disease process as developing in the lower most part of the leg and propagating cranially, aims to re-route the venous circulation via minimally invasive interventions. Classically, superficial venous insufficiency has been treated with the removal of the incompetent trunk, via open surgery or, increasingly, with endovenous interventions. Minimally invasive treatment modalities aiming to preserve the saphenous trunk, such as CHIVA and ASVAL, may also play an important role in the treatment of the patient with varicose veins.