{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01016260162601626, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.2405063291139244, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of optical and nonoptical methods for measuring surface roughness

The values of the basic characteristics of surface roughness measured by means of optical and non-optical methods often differ mutually. So far a systematic comparison of the results obtained by those methods has not been done. The results we have achieved comparing optical and non-optical methods of the surface roughness measurement for selected samples of rough surfaces and for selected methods are presented.