{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016973125884016973, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.2105263157894735, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Towards Goal-oriented Requirements Engineering for Ontology Specification Can goals replace competency questions ?

Competency questions have been accepted by many as the key artifact in ontology specification. Nonetheless, many methods that used them lack support to the process of discovering such questions. In a previous paper Goal-oriented requirements specification in proposed as the solution to this problem. Now we elaborate on that work and discuss whether competency questions are necessary. In this paper we present a proof-of-concept that show that a GORE method can fulfill the role played by competency questions in ontology specifications and that in fact, it is a more appropriate solution.