{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019230769230769232, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.565420560747664, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Assessment of International Competitiveness of AI Industry Based on Positive and Negative Ideal Points Weighting Method

China, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and other major AI superpowers as research objects, this paper establishes the assessment index system with the diamond model, weights the international competitiveness indexes of AI industry in the four countries based on positive and negative ideal points, and applies the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm to obtain the final weights. Then, the TOPSIS assessment method is used to score and rank their international competitiveness of AI industry. It is concluded that the United States is on the leading position in the human factor, knowledge factor, capital factor, enterprise strategy structure/competitors, and policy laws and regulations. China has a complete infrastructure system and huge market demand. The leading of these indicators is also the reason why China can catch up in the development of some industries when it participates in the global value division. Europe also performs well in knowledge factors, capital factors, strategic structure/competitors, and policies and regulations but needs to invest more in AI industry infrastructure. Finally, this paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the countries and reasons to provide comparative reference among different countries for AI industry.