{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024324324324324326, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0009009009009009009, 'mean_word_length': 5.385057471264368, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Intravenous immunoglobulin as treatment for myasthenia gravis: current evidence and outcomes

We examined the current evidence for the efficacy of IV immunoglobulin (IVIG) in myasthenia gravis (MG) and the outcomes used to demonstrate this efficacy. There is class 1 evidence for the use of short-term IVIG in MG patients worsening MG and also good evidence for IVIG use in myasthenic crisis. For long-term maintenance therapy, controlled studies are lacking and the evidence is limited to class III retrospective studies. The clinical scales, serological, electrophysiological, and patient-reported quality of life outcomes with IVIG have been assessed. At this time, the quantitative myasthenia gravis score, a functional scale, remains the preferable outcome measure as it has demonstrated responsiveness in the clinical trial setting, but a scale incorporating patient-reported outcomes and the patients complaint of fatigue is likely to be preferable. The MG-composite is such a scale, but has measurement limitations that may reduce its sensitivity. Across trials, IVIG has generally been well tolerated.