{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028154327424400417, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02502606882168926, 'mean_word_length': 4.647058823529412, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Drift Comparisons of Low-Expansion Foams and Conventional Sprays

Experiments were conducted to compare the drift of low-expansion foam and conventional sprays in a low-speed horizontal wind tunnel under controlled environmental conditions. Dimensions of the tunnel were 1.30 m high, 0.61 m wide, and 7.32 m long. Wind speed was maintained at 1.52 m/sec. Drift was compared for spray solutions, with and without foam adjuvants, using several different types and sizes of air-inducting nozzles and three sizes of conventional fan nozzles. Large drops produced by the air-inducting nozzles, with and without foam adjuvant, resulted in significantly less drift beyond 1.83 and 6.10 m than sprays from the conventional fan nozzles. The addition of foam adjuvant to the spray solution resulted in increased drift beyond 1.83 m for sprays from the air-induction nozzles in several comparisons but did not result in a significant increase in the drift beyond 6.10 m.