{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01951219512195122, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0032520325203252032, 'mean_word_length': 6.080459770114943, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Performance Analysis of Metaheuristic and Constraint Programming Approaches to Generate Structural Test Cases

Structural test case generation has been carried out by various approaches in software testing. Metaheuristics and constraint programming approaches are two of the more important approaches used for generating structural test cases [1], [2]. However, both of these approaches have limitations, which prevent them to be used in various applications, like wireless communication and aeronautical engineering, because the problems in these areas involve variables with large domains and complex constraints.