{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026690391459074734, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.540697674418604, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Same, Same But Different? Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Approaches for Paediatric CFS/ME and Depression

Background: Approximately one in three children and young people with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME) also have probable depression. Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has a growing evidence base as an effective treatment approach for CFS/ME and for depression in this population. Aims: Given the high degree of co-morbidity, this discussion paper aims to compare and contrast CBT for CFS/ME and CBT for depression in children and young people. Method: The existing literature on CBT for depression and CBT for CFS/ME, in relation to children and young people was reviewed. Results: Whilst there are commonalities to both treatments, the cognitive behavioural model of CFS/ME maintenance includes different factors and has a different emphasis to the cognitive behavioural model of depression, resulting in different intervention targets and strategies in a different sequence. Conclusions: A collaborative, formulation-driven approach to intervention should inform the intervention targets and treatment strategies.