{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03755458515283843, 'fraction_numerical': 0.034934497816593885, 'mean_word_length': 5.031578947368421, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ibutilide Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: 5-Year Experience in a Community Hospital

Many institutions restrict the use of ibutilide because of the potential risk of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PMVT). Over a 5-year period from June 2000 to May 2005, 238 patients, 151 men and 87 women, with a mean age of 67.1 years (range, 22-94 years), received intravenous ibutilide at our institution. Ibutilide was administered by nurses or physicians in 4 clinical settings: emergency department (n = 80), intensive care unit (n = 11), patient room on telemetry (n = 107), and in the cardiac catheterization/electrophysiology laboratory (n = 40). Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 59% of patients outside the catheterization/electrophysiology laboratory. The incidence of PMVT was 1.7%. Three patients had brief nonsustained PMVT and 1 patient had a sustained PMVT. There was no difference in outcome whether a physician was present at the time of ibutilide administration. Our data suggest that ibutilide is a safe and efficacious drug when ordered by experienced physicians in properly selected patients in a variety of monitored settings.