{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.00906344410876133, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.027272727272727, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
FEATURES OF PROOF IN CASES OF PROTECTION OF PRIVACY

The article examines the procedural features of proof in cases of protection of privacy, analyzes the judicial practice in this category of cases. The author concludes that the right to privacy should not interfere with the equally important right to judicial protection when the participants in the process are deprived of the opportunity to collect and submit to the court evidence relevant to the case. The analysis of judicial practice reveals wide limits of judicial discretion in cases of protection of the right to privacy, and in this regard, contradictory judicial practice in this category of cases.