{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030303030303030304, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010101010101010102, 'mean_word_length': 4.891089108910891, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[One- or two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparative study].

A consecutive series of 300 M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiograms was reviewed retrospectively by 2 independent observers. These tests had been performed in adult patients who were either ambulatory or hospitalized in a community hospital. The diagnostic contribution of two-dimensional echo in comparison to M-mode was nil in three-quarters of the cases; it was rated as important or essential in only 20% of the cases. It is concluded that M-mode echocardiography in adults retains its value in everyday cardiac practice.