{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02428363283147159, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006799417192812044, 'mean_word_length': 5.186186186186186, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Developmental Effects on Odor Learning and Memory in Children a

ABSTRACT: The child version of the California Odor Learning Test (COLT) was designed to assess cognitive functioning in impaired and healthy children. The COLT's rationale was based on two assumptions. First, measures of cognitive functioning are a good index of severity or extent of brain damage if compared between normal and clinical populations. Second, the cognitive‐mediated tasks of verbal odor recall, recognition and identification were suitable to evaluate cognitive functioning. The focus of this study was to determine the COLT's ability to detect developmental differences in odor learning and memory. The participants were 51 healthy children who were twice administered the COLT with a weekly delay between tests. They were ascribed to two age‐groups (7‐10 and 11‐15 years old) according to levels of cognitive development. The COLT employed 22 common odors and included two sessions. In the first session, children learned two sets of six odors. The first set was presented three times, the second one once, during a single learning episode. Following learning, children recalled the odors of the first set by name at free recall and category‐cued recall. The second session included the following tasks: long‐term free odor recall and category‐cued odor recall, odor recognition‐memory and verbal odor identification. A series of analyses of variance (ANOVAs, p <0.05) with age as between‐subject variable and repeated measurements on recall revealed significant differences between the two groups on the number of odors correctly recalled by name both at free recall, category‐cued recall, recognition and identification. There were differences in false alarms at odor recognition between the two groups. Children from both groups benefited from a learning effect over odor trials. A gender effect was found for odor free recall at retest. These results suggest that the COLT has the potential to serve as a useful tool in the assessment of cognitive functioning in children.