{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02330097087378641, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003883495145631068, 'mean_word_length': 5.7894736842105265, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A note on correction of strong-motion accelerograms for instrument response


 Two methods for accelerometer instrument correction are described: (1) a direct numerical differentiation of recorded accelerograms from which high-frequency digitization errors have been filtered out and (2) an ideal “mathematical accelerometer” with a natural frequency significantly higher than the natural frequency of the recording instrument. Although both methods give good results, the first one is recommended for standard use.