{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029548989113530325, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020995334370139968, 'mean_word_length': 4.72, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Latin America in Comparative Perspective: New Approaches to Methods and Analysis . Peter H. Smith, ed. (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995. Pp. 328. Illustrations. Index. Notes. Bibliography. $17.95.)

southward through the Florida Keys and the failure to mention even the peoples of the Gulf coast from Apalachee westward to the Mississippi. A number of minor errors further mars the treatment of the Southeast's inhabitants. The most egregious error occurs in Salisbury's map for 1750, depicting the Apalachee as then still in possession of their homeland in the Tallahassee region. There is no mention of the Calusa or other aboriginal inhabitants of South Florida later than 1573, and the 1573 reference misdates the assassination of the Calusa leader Carlos. Such errors suggest a possible lack of diligence in checking the correctness of their statements about the people of that region. In view of this volume's meager attention to the Southeast, hopefully Salisbury and Trigger-Swagerty were not misinformed about the Southeast volume of the Handbook of North American Indians as "in preparation" and "in progress" under the editorship of Raymond D. Fogelson. That would seem to be the case if they were referring to the abortive one that has been in gestation since the early 1970s.