{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03601440576230492, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03961584633853541, 'mean_word_length': 4.52317880794702, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects Of An Auditory Biofeedback Device On Plantar Pressure In Participants With Chronic Ankle Instability: 531 Board #4 May 27, 1

RESULTS: For all three directions (AM, M, PM) there were significant differences between all of the taping conditions except between Day 3 KT and Day 3 NT (p<0.05). Day 3 KT showed a significant improvement as a benefit of the taping application comparing to the baseline data. The power for all three variables was high (0.906-0.998), with moderate effect sizes from 0.364 to 0.544. CONCLUSIONS: Kinesio taping application may benefit those with FAI by increasing dynamic balance as shown in the SEBT. The apparent immediate and intermediate term effects of Kinesio tape (Day 1 NT vs Day 1 KT) and (Day 1 NT vs Day 3 KT) on dynamic balance show potential for benefits to the rehabilitation process.