{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03208556149732621, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0106951871657754, 'mean_word_length': 6.3125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Economic analysis of China's reinsurance regulation policy

This paper investigates China's reinsurance regulation's necessity, measurement and efficiency by market price distortion, indirect regulation mode and Kaldor-Hicks Criterion respectively. We also provide a complete case study on 14-year development of China's “Domestic Reinsurance Priority” provision which has be recently cancelled in “China Insurance Law (2009)” and “China Reinsurance Business Regulation (2010)”. The paper finally draws a conclusion that firstly reinsurance regulation policy should consider “social-economic welfare maximization” as the ultimate goal; Secondly, to measure the efficiency of reinsurance regulation policies, we should never be satisfied with the level of compulsory provisions; Thirdly, we should gradually adopt indirect regulation on the basis of direct mode by regulation experiences accumulation, especially for emerging countries.