{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019148936170212766, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02269503546099291, 'mean_word_length': 5.562790697674418, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Scale-Dependent Functional Redundancy in a Tropical Forest

Functional redundancy is an important tool for justifying and prioritizing species protection in forest ecosystem, but it is a scale-dependent. If functional redundancy really exists, functional trait composition tends to have higher predictive ability of community assembly than species composition. Thus, comparing the differences in the predictive ability of community assembly between species and functional trait compositions across spatial scale represents a useful tool to quantify how functional redundancy varies across spatial scales. Here, we used variation partitioning in combination with distance-based Moran’s eigenvector maps to compare the differences in the predictive ability of community assembly between species composition and functional trait composition across spatial scales (20, 30, 40, 50, and 100 m) in a 20-ha subtropical forest plot. We found that functional trait composition possessed higher predictive ability of niche-based abiotic filtering process than species composition within 40 m. At 50 and 100 m scales, both species and functional trait compositions had approximately equal predictive ability of dispersal limitation processes. Thus, functional redundancy can only exist within 40 m scale but not 50 and 100 m scales. As a result, priority species loss protection should be performed at 50 and 100 m scales.