{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022675736961451247, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023809523809523808, 'mean_word_length': 5.131944444444445, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Loss of Metribuzin and Ethyl-metribuzin from Glass and Soil Surfaces

The loss of metribuzin and ethyl-metribuzin from soil and glass surfaces was studied to determine if volatilization and/or photodegradation could explain inconsistent weed control with these herbicides. In growth chamber experiments, phytotoxicity of ethyl-metribuzin decreased as the time between surface application and initial watering increased. Approximately 50% of the applied metribuzin and ethyl-metribuzin volatilized from soil within 24 h, with an additional 15 to 20% lost during the next 11 days, except about 5% additional ethyl-metribuzin was lost from Chehalis sandy loam. Both herbicides volatilized more rapidly from glass than from soil, with 75 to 90% of the loss occurring within 24 h and as great as 99% loss after 12 days. Loss by photodecomposition from soil or glass surfaces was minimal.