{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015743073047858942, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0031486146095717885, 'mean_word_length': 5.407258064516129, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of PNF and NDT Bobath Concepts on Ischemic Strokes Patients for Trunk Rehabilitation – A Randomized Pilot Study

Introduction: Recently, various systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have evaluated the efficacy of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Across them proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) and neuro-developmental treatment (NDT) Bobath resulted to be an effective and widely used therapeutic approaches.

Objective of the work: The aim of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of PNF and NDT Bobath concept for improvement of trunk motor control in patients after ischemic stroke.

Materials and methods: The study consisted of 30 patients up to 3 months after ischemic stroke. Participants were randomly assigned to two study groups. Both group consisted of 15 patients underwent rehabilitation according to the PNF or NDT Bobath concept. Comparison of the changes in the Trunk Impairment Scale was the primary outcome.

Results: The analysis of the values of total TIS scale showed a statistically significant improvement in both group. Within group analysis showed statistical significance among baseline and intermediate measurement, and among baseline and final measurement within both groups. The analysis of total TIS scale indicators between the PNF and Bobath groups showed no statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: Both the PNF and Bobath concepts have proven to be effective in the treatment of posture control and there have been significant improvements in patients from both groups.

