{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03232323232323232, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01818181818181818, 'mean_word_length': 5.526315789473684, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reliability of resonance-averaged neutron-capture measurements

The authors show that well established levels (within a limited spin range) in 146Nd below 2.2 MeV are indeed populated by primary transitions in '2 keV neutrons' resonance-averaged capture (RAC) measurements. Therefore, an apparent failure to identify crucial levels in 146Nd from previous 'reactor-neutrons' RAC measurements is not a valid basis for questioning the general reliability of the RAC method for level identification.