Democrats would eliminate the Electoral College making voter fraud king

Electoral College

By eliminating the Electoral College, Democrats would make America a democracy instead of a republic.  In a democracy the majority always rules and the minority has no rights resulting in their ability to challenge the system being stripped away.  This leads to corruption and tyranny in which the system will eventually collapse into a dictatorship.

America was founded as a republic and not a democracy for a reason.  In a republic only those who contribute taxes vote for their representatives on how money is spent by the government.  But the powers in Washington have changed America to be more of a democracy wherein those who do not pay taxes also vote on how that money is spent – and they always vote to spend taxes other people contributed on benefits for themselves.  This is what has allowed pandering liberals and moderates to gain control of government and is bringing about the decline of America.  Democracy always fails when the mob realizes they can vote themselves benefits.


Robert A. Heinlein explains how democracy breeds corruption

Democrats want to eliminate the Electoral College and make America a true Democracy with elections won by popular vote.  An examination of this “majority rules” idea reveals that this system only leads to corruption, decline, and eventually to a socialist dictatorship like Venezuela.  The electoral system was designed to protect the majority of states that have smaller populations from depredations by the biggest states.

California makes voter fraud legal

A number of Democrat states are banding together to pool their electoral votes for the candidate that has the popular vote and have enough votes to overwhelm the Electoral College.  How does this corruption make voting more fair?  The answer is it doesn’t.  California’s Democrat legislature and governor just signed into law an act giving illegal aliens the right to vote in American elections, thereby stacking the popular vote with millions of illegal votes.

Do you want illegal aliens deciding who runs our government?  Do you want people who do not pay taxes voting benefits for themselves from taxpayer’s money?  It’s not bad enough that Democrat’s commit ten times more voter fraud than Republicans with dead people voting, people voting multiple times, casting votes for those who don’t show up for elections, gerrymandering, and machine tampering like Port St. Lucie, FL, where 146% of registered voter ballots were counted in the last election.  What does it take for Americans to understand that the Democrats are disenfranchising them in order to steal from taxpayers?

Here’s hoping that California’s Mexicans put an initiative on the ballot to cede the state to Mexico so we can be rid of the damn cheating fools.  America was not designed to be a Democracy where anyone who didn’t contribute to building the nation could vote how resources are spent.  American greed thy name is Democrat.

Related articles;

Gov. Brown of California signs bill allowing illegal aliens to vote

Blue states trying to override electoral system

Electoral fraud

Best articles;

Christians crushed the Inquisition, Moslems endorse the Jihad

You don’t need science to prove global warming is a scam

Morality in humanity

Black Lives Matter – an analysis of America’s newest hate group

Young liberal wisdom; a series of unfortunate beliefs



About dustyk103


13 Responses to Democrats would eliminate the Electoral College making voter fraud king

  1. Jules Guidry says:

    They can’t win the next election with the legal citizens of this nation, therefore make the illegals into legal voters via the stroke of “moonbeams” pen. Yep, CA has just cemented its position in history as the home of the “fruits, nuts and flakes”. And, possibly, doomed this nation at the same time.


  2. kohler says:


    Supporters include former Senator Fred Thompson (R–TN), Governor Jim Edgar (R–IL), and Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO). The Nebraska GOP State Chairman, Mark Fahleson.


    Michael Long, chairman of the Conservative Party of New York State







    The National Advisory Board of National Popular Vote includes former Congressman John Buchanan (R–Alabama), and former Senators David Durenberger (R–Minnesota), and Jake Garn (R–Utah).


    • dustyk103 says:

      Obviously, you either didn’t read or didn’t understand my article, and neither do any of the people you named as they obviously didn’t address the corruption involved in stuffing the ballot box with fraudulent votes.


      • kohler says:

        Under the current system of electing the President, every vote in every precinct matters inside every battleground state. If it were true that an election in which the winner is the candidate who receives the most popular votes is “a guarantee of corruption,” then we should see today a wealth of evidence of rampant fraud in presidential elections inside every battleground state. Similarly, we should see evidence of rampant fraud today in every gubernatorial election in every state.

        Executing electoral fraud without detection requires a situation in which a very small number of people can have a very large impact.

        Under the current state-by-state winner-take-all system, there are huge incentives for fraud and mischief, because a small number of people in a battleground state can affect enough popular votes to swing all of that state’s electoral votes.

        In 2004, President George W. Bush had a nationwide lead of 3,012,171 popular votes. However, if 59,393 Bush voters in Ohio had shifted to Senator John Kerry in 2004, Kerry would have carried Ohio and thus become President. It would be far easier for potential fraudsters to manufacture 59,393 votes in Ohio than to manufacture 3,012,171 million votes (51 times more votes) nationwide. Moreover, it would be far more difficult to conceal fraud involving 3,012,171 votes.





  3. kohler says:




    The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the majority of Electoral College votes and the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country. It does not eliminate the Electoral College. It does not make the country a true democracy. We would still be a republic, in which citizens continue to elect the President by a majority of Electoral College votes by states, to represent us and conduct the business of government.

    True democracy is a form of government in which people vote on all policy initiatives directly.



  4. kohler says:










  5. kohler says:











  6. kohler says:

    California’s Democratic legislature and governor did Not sign into law an act giving illegal aliens the right to vote in American elections.



    • dustyk103 says:

      Well, Kohler, you certainly proved me wrong in gauging your understanding of the electoral system. That was an outstanding dissertation. I’d like to see what you say about how to tackle subjects like fraudulent voting, gerrymandering, and California’s move to give illegal aliens the ability to vote since that seems to be the crux in all elections these days. Not to mention that is the very subject of my article and why I don’t want to see elections shift to popular votes as they can be so easily stacked. (Along with the fact that, had it been so, that American would have had Mr. Global Warming, Algore, in charge when 9/11 came to pass.)


      • kohler says:

        With the current presidential electoral system, we have seen how 537 votes, all in one state, determined the 2000 election, when there was a lead of 537,179 (1,000 times more) popular votes nationwide.


        • dustyk103 says:

          And how many of those “popular” votes were fraudulent? In the 2012 election just one district in Florida reported 146 votes for every 100 registered voters and they all went to Democrats. California’s Democrats want to give the vote to their two million illegal aliens. If that total were 2,537,179 more votes, how would it make it any more right to give the election to the popular vote just because one or two states create ways to stuff the ballot box even more? That is why the popular vote cannot be justified.


  7. kohler says:

    In 2012, Florida had a Republican Attorney General.

    If it were actually true that a presidential election in which the winner is the candidate receiving the most popular votes encourages voter fraud then we should surely have seen a voluminous number of prosecutions involving the tens of thousands of ballot boxes in the outcome-determining states in the periods immediately following every presidential election in the country.

    In November 2012, there were Republican Attorneys General in most of the battleground states that determined the outcome of the 2012 presidential election:
    ● Florida—29 electoral votes,
    ● Ohio—18 electoral votes,
    ● Virginia—13 electoral votes,
    ● Wisconsin—10 electoral votes,
    ● Colorado—9 electoral votes,
    ● Pennsylvania—20 electoral votes, and
    ● Michigan—16 electoral votes.

    These seven battleground states with Republican Attorneys General together possessed 115 electoral Votes. President Obama won each of these battleground states by low-single-digit margins. In 2012, President Obama received only 64 more than the 270 electoral votes required for election.

    There were not prosecutions involving the tens of thousands of ballot boxes in these seven outcome-determining states in the 2012 presidential election.

    Are these seven Republican Attorneys General also guilty of not promoting the interests of their own political party in attempting to prosecute cases of election fraud that would, at the minimum, embarrass (if not convict) members of the Democratic Party and embarrass the sitting Democratic President?


    • dustyk103 says:

      The Republican Party is guilty of allying with Democrats much more than they are of working against them. The ballot fraud in Port St. Lucie contributed to the removal of Col. Allen West from Congress, a very staunch conservative like Ted Cruz who worked against the corruption in Washington. I’m sure they were all too happy to see him go and they expressed no interest in prosecuting the ballot tampering there.


Leave a Reply to Jules Guidry Cancel reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s
