Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?


Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano

Report a correction
More shading units 4,096 vs 3,584 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 256 vs 224 32 more texture mapping units
More compute units 64 vs 56 8 more compute units
Front view of Radeon RX Vega 56

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Report a correction
Higher pixel rate 94.14 GPixel/s vs 79.81 GPixel/s Around 20% higher pixel rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,471 MHz vs 1,247 MHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 210W vs 250W More than 15% lower TDP

Features Key features of the Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano  vs 56 



Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
79.81 GPixel/s
Radeon RX Vega 56
94.14 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
319.2 GTexel/s
Radeon RX Vega 56
329.5 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano
10,215 GFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 56
10,544 GFLOPS



Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano  vs
GPU name Vega 10 Vega 10
Clock speed 1,156 MHz 1,156 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,247 MHz 1,471 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Shading units 4,096 3,584
Texture mapping units 256 224
Render output processors 64 64
Compute units 64 56
Pixel rate 79.81 GPixel/s 94.14 GPixel/s
Texture rate 319.2 GTexel/s 329.5 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 10,215 GFLOPS 10,544 GFLOPS


Radeon RX Vega 64 Nano  vs
Memory clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 1,600 MHz 1,600 MHz
Memory bus 2,048 bit 2,048 bit
Memory 8,192 MB 8,192 MB
Memory bandwidth 409.6 GB/s 409.6 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 250W 210W


comments powered by Disqus