Monday, April 29, 2013


Infinity Insurance headquarters
in Birmingham, AL










Drayton Nabers




















Robby Scott Hill said...

Damn that Abraham Lincoln and his 13th Amendment with that silly notion that all men (including Blacks, Jews, Native Americans & Women of all races) should be treated equally in the eyes of the law. What can we do? We'll have to get us a racist, sexist, neo-Confederate President of these here United States that we've been forced back into to appoint us some bigots to the federal bench. There's always a workaround. God made the White Man smarter than the rest of the races & He will ordain Judges that He has chosen to put these minorities that Abrahamus Africanus wrongly encouraged & the women folk back into their places serving a White Man and giving birth to his babies.

Redeye said...


Welcome to our world, and by "our" I mean black folks. We call the legal lynchings.

Anonymous said...

L.S.: you hit the nail on the head when you called our justice system the bermuda triangle.

I couldn't agree with you more. Everything you state is true about our situation here in Alabama.

Glad there is someone brave enough to step forward and call these people and corporations out.

Anonymous said...

Good Lawdy, Miss Clawdy . . . these people really are bad crooks. As you point out, it only stands to reason that all of the defense lawyers should have been there for a hearing that was postponed six minutes prior to start time. They weren't there because they were in on the scheme. I guess they think regular people are too stupid to figure out such things.

legalschnauzer said...


Great to have you back in the commenting section. With tax season over, hope we will be hearing more of your insights. I think many people, even Mrs. S, read them more than my posts.

I ask her, "Have you read my post?"

Answer: "Not yet. I've got to read Robby Scott Hill's comments first."

Anonymous said...

LS, I think you caught these lawyers with their hands in the proverbial cookie jar. Since this is a federal court, we all pay for that cookie jar--and it's not supposed to be sullied and tarnished by con artists.

legalschnauzer said...

Great point, Redeye. How ironic that Clarence Thomas was the first person many of us heard using such a term--I think "high-tech lynching" were his words. Now, Clarence sits on Antonin Scalia's lap at the top of a system that produces "legal lynchings" for all too many Americans, of all colors--especially those who oppose high-priced corporate defense lawyers.

Anonymous said...

Isn't Drayton Nabers one of Bob Riley's "good old boys"?

legalschnauzer said...

Anon at 9:25--

Yes, Drayton Nabers was appointed to the Al Supreme Court by Bob Riley. Nabers also wrote a book about character, which I think sold six copies. The notion of an Alabama judge knowing anything about character is laughable.

Anonymous said...

Glad to see Andrew Kreig is keeping up with your wife's case and other nasty courtroom deeds in Alabama. Props to him.

TLR said...

Lots of good material in the update, LS. I have a lot of respect for Andrew Kreig's work. Aren't too many journalists out there who also have legal training. And there are even fewer lawyer/journalists who are willing to write the truth about courtroom wrongdoing. Look forward to reading his book.

Anonymous said...

Love me some Robby Scott Hill in the morning. Always makes me think, usually makes me laugh.

James Greek said...

Let us know when it comes out!

jeffrey spruill said...

Antonin Scalia sits on Clarence Thomas's lap with the ghost of Rehnquist directing the latest cover up:

Anonymous said...

Perhaps Mr. Kreig's inquiries will cause some sphincters to tighten at the Hugo Black building.

Anonymous said...

USA was going down as a well planned event. Only the top levels of the country would survive this time.

Systems were all constructed by the same organized crime, global corporations.

Courts were set up as a system for the 'upper' that could afford the schooling programming, sold by Wall Street's Federal Reserve System, the Fed. No lawyer knows the money system in the USA, or they would be the richest in the country.

It was an intentional dumbing down, pretend law school.

Where does Mrs. Schnauzer actually seek a settlement from?

Well the Fed doesn't allow one keystroke to be functioned without a complete track and trace. Mrs. Schnauzer, in other words, gets her settlement from the OWNER of the judges, lawyers and other Bermuda Triangle T Rex wannabes: Federal Reserve "Bank."

As long as the Fed owns the court system, the USA is not about due process law - gosh didn't we all notice already!

Transference of wealth is the motto of the Fed and thus, why law schools are given the curriculum for the most, to not notice digital dust has gotten the super power America to be owned by the Fed.

Attorneys at law in the vast numbers in the USA should get together and all sue the Fed. That would be worth a fortune for all Americans.

Yes, LS, your endurance of the power matching Murphy Schnauzer and you know what this feels like.

Thanks as always.

Unknown said...

Robby, Jews threw a tantrum because the religious protection wasn't as good as they wanted in immigrating here, pre-US Constitution.

The Bill of Rights' cheered them up, though and they themselves write about how pestering didn't end until better words were added - our Bundle of Rights.

Women? Please, the US Constitution unfortunately needs an Addendum for the equality to be put back in, after all it was the Treaty of the Five Nations' that provided the "idea" and women were only property to the "white man."

Talk lots about the US Constitution, Robby, cause that is what all attorneys take an oath to actually go into the courts, ?, and protect?

But, then, why don't attorneys all get together and get rid of the unethical and criminal enterprising?

Anonymous said...

The attorneys know how it works! They are the soldiers perpetuating global doom. Most are spineless cowards thus why they don't milk it for more than they already do. A sure tell sign is a judge who was a business major prior to entering law school!

David in S. Alabama said...

Drayton Nabers is a closeted idiot.

jeffrey spruill said...


Do federal magistrates go through the nominations process?

Also- Putnams law clerk- David Waters saw his need of intimidation by surrounding himself professional cowards--US Marshals.(I would add that to the lawsuit.)

legalschnauzer said...


I'm not certain about this, but I think magistrates are appointed by the district judges. If I'm right about that, then they don't go through the nomination process. Welcome insights from others.

We have a judge in the Middle District of Alabama, Wallace Capel, who came from Michigan and is not eligible to serve as a magistrate in Alabama because he isn't a member of our state's bar. My understanding is that the district judges wanted him, so he is on the bench. But under the law, he is ineligible to serve here.

Anonymous said...

anon @ 4:40 pm, thank you for the mental cup o'joe.

Add the fact, that, the type "A" personality which appears attracted to the "law" as a "legal full time profession" are indeed a certain 'energy'. Doctors same "ego" attraction - money, power, prestige and of course most, bullies.

Get the Jurisprudence Doctorate and think it's the tongue of an all powerful god.

My understanding is, "law" is decided how it's going to be according to the Inns of Court or other gathering of powers that operate the racket of unconstitutional.

Law firms in Delhi said...

I’ll say that within the scope of Universal Human Morality under the laws of God…”If you are willing to take one’s life….be willing to also give your own life”. There is always an equivalent responsibility when acts are committed whether consciously or unconsciously especially against humanity. Somehow atrocities done on any innocent human life must be answered always in God’s own Perfect Time. And people has to believe that their sins will seek them out no matter where they hide. They might not pay today, but they will definitely pay later.

Anonymous said...

I have a few experiences with the USA Judicial System. It is not a Justice System for sure. The main reason it exists is to enforce the state as the biggest ape. The Judicial System exists to ensure company's can operate at will without legal reprisal, and to enrich the attorneys.