{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018793273986152326, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.979310344827586, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Conceptualizing Evaluation in African Contexts

This chapter explores the meaning of decolonization and indigenization and the importance of these terms in conceptualizing research and evaluation in formerly colonized nations. We provide an exploration of ways in which efforts to “Africanize” the theory and practice of evaluation can be translated into widespread practice. In doing so, the rationale for an African‐rooted and African‐driven evaluation is discussed. We describe four evaluation conceptual frameworks: the least indigenized, integrative, predominantly Indigenous, and third space evaluation methodology. At the heart of these conceptual frameworks is the Indigenous knowledge systems that must be restored, protected, revitalized, and afforded justice. Our argument is that philosophical assumptions specific to African cultures and histories should inform evaluation theory and practice. The emerging evaluation practices will then emanate from the cultures and values of the African peoples.