{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.043993231810490696, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012267343485617596, 'mean_word_length': 5.461748633879782, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Target-controlled infusion of remifentanil and propofol during operation with suspension laryngoscopy].

OBJECTIVE
To evaluate target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentail-propofol and the balanced anesthesia of fentanyl-isoflurane during the operation with suspension laryngscope.


METHODS
Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for the surgery through suspension laryngoscopy were randomly divided into two groups: TCI group and control group. In TCI group, anesthesia was maintained with TCI remifentanil-propofol which was stopped at the end of operation. The target plasma concentration of remifentanil was set at 6 microg/L and propofol at 3 mg/L. In control group, anesthesia was induced with intravenous fentanl 2.5 microg/kg and propofol 1-2 mg/kg, maintained with fentanl 0.03 microg.kg(-1). min(-1) and 1% isoflurane which was stopped at the end of surgery. Intubation was facilitated with succinylcholine 1-1.5 mg/kg.MAP, HR, ECG, S(p)O(2) and P(ET)CO(2) were monitored during anesthesia. The following parameters were recorded and compared between two groups: (1) the changes in blood pressure (BP), heart rate(HR) and S(p)O(2) at different time point; (2) recovery profile including the time of response to verbal commands, autonomous breathing, tracheal extubation, orientation recovery, discharging from PACU after operation; (3) OAAS scores after operation; (4) postoperative complications; (5) unexpected events and awareness during operation.


RESULT
(1) The hemodynamics were stable while the target plasma concentration of remifentanil was set at 6 microg/L and propofol at 3 mg/L. (2) During tracheal intubation, suspension laryngoscope was inserted, and extubation MAP was significantly lower in TCI group than that in control group; (3) There were no significant differences in hemodynamic values and S(p)O(2) of different time points between two groups. Study group was faster than control group on recovery profile including the time of response to verbal commands, autonomous breathing, tracheal extubation, orientation recovery and discharging from PACU. There was respectively one unexpected event in both groups.


CONCLUSION
Remifentanil supplemented with isoflurane anesthesia can achieve the optimal hemodynamic stability during the operation with suspension laryngoscopy and better recovery profile from anesthesia than fentanyl.