{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03114486695891528, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009226220817616475, 'mean_word_length': 5.470646437994723, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 3, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Omecamtiv Mecarbil: A Novel Mechanistic and Therapeutic Approach to Chronic Heart Failure Management

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem in the United States as well as worldwide. Chronic heart failure is a syndrome of reduced cardiac output resulting from impaired ventricular function, impaired filling, or a combination of both. Associated symptoms include dyspnea, fatigue, and decreased exercise tolerance. HF has a marked effect on morbidity and mortality, given limited therapeutic choices. The first line of therapeutic agents indicated in heart failure are beta-blockers. Other drugs and therapeutic modalities employed in HF treatment include angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), sacubitril (neprilysin inhibitor) combination with the ARB, valsartan, small doses of aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARAs) in the setting of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and beta-blockers. Additionally, the sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin in the setting of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or sacubitril-valsartan plus beta-blocker have been employed. Other therapeutic modalities have included loop diuretics, digoxin, the hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate combination, ivabradine, the inotropes, dobutamine, milrinone, and dopamine. Decreased cardiac contractility is central to the systolic HF. Therapeutic agents employed to increase cardiac contractility in HF are limited because of their mechanistic-related adverse effect profiles. Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a first of its class cardiac myosin activator that increases the cardiac contractility by specifically binding to the catalytic S1 domain of cardiac myosin, to be employed in heart failure treatment. This agent has demonstrated benefit in reducing heart rate, peripheral vascular resistance, mean left arterial pressure, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in the animal models. Additionally, OM is known to improve systolic wall thickening, stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO). OM increases systolic ejection time (SET), cardiac myocyte fractional shortening without significant increase of LV dP/dtmax, myocardial oxygen consumption, and myocyte intracellular calcium. The benefits of OM have been demonstrated through key trials, as (i) The Acute Treatment with Omecamtiv mecarbil to Increase Contractility in Acute Heart Failure (ATOMIC-AHF), and (ii) The Chronic Oral Study of Myosin Activation to Increase Contractility in Heart Failure (COSMIC-HF). The Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial is ongoing and can help provide further clinical data. OM provides a novel mechanism and therapeutic approach to managing patients with HF. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that OM capability can improve cardiac function, decrease ventricular wall stress, reverse ventricular remodeling, and promote sympathetic withdrawal.


Introduction And Background
Heart failure (HF) is a significant public health challenge, with a prevalence of more than 5.8 million individuals in the United States (US) and greater than 23 million patients worldwide [1]. Acute decompensated HF (ADHF) is the primary cause for hospitalization in the United States among the elderly individuals with age greater than 65 years, and causing almost 1 million hospitalizations annually [2,3]. Prevalence of HF was higher among men in the Framingham Heart study. The prevalence was eight per 1000 for ages between 50 and 59 years, increasing to 66 per 1000 for those between the ages of 80 to 89. The prevalence of heart failure in women was observed to increase from eight cases/1,000 in the 50 to 59 years category to 79 cases/1,000 in those between 80 and 89 years of age [4]. Over the next four decades, the HF in the US is projected to rise. An estimated 772,000 new HF cases are projected to occur by the year 2040 [5]. Current available HF treatments have severe shortcomings and safety issues. There is a significant need for the newer agents that can help improve long-term outcomes and symptomatic relief. HF has a marked effect on morbidity and mortality, with limited therapeutic choices, particularly in the inotropic therapy environment [6].

Review
Overview of chronic heart failure 1 1 1 2, 3 1 In chronic heart failure (CHF), also known as congestive heart failure, there is decreased capacity of the heart to circulate and propel adequate blood and oxygenation throughout the body [5]. CHF is a syndrome, in which there is decreased cardiac output (CO) resulting from poor ventricular ejection, impaired filling, or a combination of both. As a result of impaired cardiac pumping ability, the heart becomes incapable of keeping up with the body's oxygen demands. This results in symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, and decreased exercise tolerance. HF may contribute to fluid retention, pulmonary congestion, and peripheral edema. In some instances, the disorder can be mild, triggering symptoms noticeable only during exercise. In other situations, the condition may be quite severe, triggering life-threatening symptoms [6]. Patients at higher risk of developing HF are typically older, African-American, and male. Hypertension, end organ failure (renal failure), diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and coronary artery disease can increase the risk of heart failure. There is genetic predisposition to heart failure, additionally, patients who smoke, and are obese are also at a higher risk [7].
Based on ejection fraction, heart failure can be categorized into three broad categories. These include: (1) Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), EF > 40%; (2) heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), EF >50%; and (3) heart failure with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), also referred to as HFpEFborderline and HFpEF-improved with EF in HFrEF improved > 40%; EF of 40-49% and 41-49% based on US and European guidelines, respectively [7,8]. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) guideline has been used for almost a century as a foundational tool for HF risk stratification and measure of heart failure severity [9]. Besides this, the clinicians have also used the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines [7].
Cardiomyopathy frequently results in heart failure [10]. There are five known cardiomyopathies: dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive, arrhythmogenic, right-ventricular, and unclassified. The various causes of cardiomyopathy include cardiovascular, genetic, infection, inflammation, metabolic, and pregnancy. Myocardial dysfunction is the most frequent pathway to most cardiomyopathies [11]. While histologic findings for these cardiomyopathies are nonspecific, they include cellular necrosis, myocyte hypertrophy, and fibrosis [12]. Most cardiac pathology-associated myocardial dysfunction results in abnormal myocyte growth [13]. Additionally, a cascade of gene activation that stimulates cardiac remodeling ensues. Myocardial cell hypertrophy, cardiac dilatation, increased interstitial matrix formation are trademarks of cardiac remodeling [14].

Drug therapy in heart failure
Current heart failure therapy concepts rely on two mechanisms. The most successful pathway is blockage of neurohormonal activation with ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and/or aldosterone receptor blockers [15]. The second mechanism is the increased cardiac contractility. This is achieved indirectly via activation of secondmessenger signaling pathways that increase cardiac myocyte intracellular calcium concentration by betaadrenergic receptor agonists and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Unfortunately, these agents are associated with increased heart rate and myocardial oxygen demand. This results in significant arrhythmias and hypotension, leading to increased mortality [16].
Direct cardiac sarcomere contractility activation has been demonstrated to improve cardiac performance without adverse effects. Sarcomere consists of thin and thick interdigitating filaments. Myosin is the core of the thick filament and uses chemical energy derived from ATP hydrolysis for contraction. Myosin motors act on the thin filaments, which consist of actin and the regulatory complex, troponin-tropomyosin. Free calcium levels in resting muscles low thus, regulatory proteins prevent myosin from interacting with actin. Calcium is routinely and transiently released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum into the cytoplasm with every heartbeat. Calcium then binds to troponin, allowing myosin to interact with actin filaments for the contraction to occur. As calcium is removed from the cytoplasm, the muscle relaxes. Direct activation of cardiac sarcomere can be conceptually achieved either via sensitizing the regulatory proteins to calcium or activating cardiac myosin directly [17]. This concept was further explored in drug development via highthroughput screening of the cardiac myosin, adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) was conducted. This process resulted in the discovery of a small-molecule activator of cardiac myosin. This molecule was further enhanced for physical properties, potency, and pharmacokinetics, resulting in the synthesis of omecamtiv mecarbil [18]. This agent was observed to improve cardiac function in the absence of myocardial oxygen consumption changes during preclinical trials in a dog heart failure model [19].
Various markers such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP) are essential for monitoring therapies and disease progression to prevent morbidity in heart failure patients. Other markers used to monitor drug therapy in heart failure include cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). For example, the employment of vasodilators in heart failure increases CO via decreasing SVR, with inotropes deployed for blood pressure support. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) could also be readily monitored in this population, given that MAP = CO SVR. Cardiac index (CI) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) have also been used as markers to monitor heart failure therapy. OM is known to improve systolic wall thickening, stroke volume (SV), and CO [19,20].
The first line of drugs indicated in heart failure are beta-blockers, which are recommended for use, regardless of NYHA class. Beta-blockers block the SNS activation by blocking epinephrine and norepinephrine and provide benefits in controlling heart rate and reducing the risk of arrhythmias [21]. Individuals with less severe heart failure, including those with left ventricular HFpEF and no symptoms, have demonstrated the most long-term benefit [22].

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are recommended for use in all individuals with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or HfrEF, irrespective of functional class, except in those cases of intolerance or a contraindication, such as angioedema exists. Mortality reduction in heart failure observed with these agents has hovered around 30% [23].

Neprilysin inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs)
The employment of sacubitril (neprilysin inhibitor) and use with the ARB, valsartan in HF patients with mild to severe symptoms, NYHA class II-IV has further reduced the risk for cardiovascular death or heart failure associated hospitalization by 20% [29].

Beta-blockers, hydralazine and nitrates
In individuals who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors or ARBs, the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate should be considered; however, the decrease in mortality is not as profound as with ACE inhibitors and ARBs [30]. This benefit has been more profound in African-American patients, with severe symptomatic heart failure (NYHA class III or IV), where hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate combination in addition to ACE inhibitor or ARB and beta-blocker, has been shown to favorably affect myocardial remodeling as well as mortality [31].

Aldosterone antagonists
The addition of small doses of aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARAs) in the setting of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers may provide added diuresis, improved symptoms, and ejection fraction. These agents also reduce morbidity and mortality for patients in NYHA Class II-IV [32][33][34].

Sodium-glucose-transporter-2 inhibitor
The employment of the sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin in the setting of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or sacubitril-valsartan plus a beta-blocker has also been shown to reduce all-cause mortality and worsening HF in adults with NYHA Class II-IV with or without diabetes mellitus [35].

Loop diuretics
Loop diuretics reduce blood volume, which decreases edema and congestion in patients with HF. Most patients will need a loop diuretic for symptom relief. These are the only agents that have demonstrated short-term symptomatic benefits. Additionally, diuretics decrease pulmonary capillary wedge pressure as well as increase exercise capacity [36].

Digoxin
Digoxin has been used in the treatment of HF for decades. It can cause a small increase in cardiac output, improves the patient symptoms, and helps in decreasing HF-related hospitalizations. It is best reserved for individuals with symptomatic NYHA class II to IV heart failure; however, it provides no survival advantage in comparison to placebo [37]. Digoxin has been shown to reduce hospitalizations in heart failure patients, as well as reduce mortality at low serum concentrations [38][39][40].

Ivabradine
Ivabradine has been demonstrated to decrease hospitalization risk in patients with mild to moderate symptoms, within NYHA classes II-III who are in normal sinus rhythm with a resting heart rate greater than or equal to 70 beats per minute (BPM) [41]. Its ability to decrease the heart rate via selective inhibition of the current in the sinoatrial node has been employed in the treatment of the heart failure [42].
The use of intravenous inotropes can be helpful in afterload reduction for hospitalized patients unresponsive to oral agents, with decompensated heart failure with low cardiac output and evidence of endorgan hypoperfusion or hypotension. However, these agents' routine use for inpatient management of acute decompensated HF is limited due to a lack of evidence for a survival benefit and concerns regarding the risk of increased mortality and adverse side effects [43]. Additionally, only select patients who cannot be weaned from intravenous therapy while inpatient may be candidates for chronic outpatient inotropic infusion therapy. This strategy is commonly used in patients who are awaiting mechanical circulatory support or heart transplantation. Common inotropic agents include dobutamine, milrinone, and dopamine.
Several agents described above have been used in the management of heart failure, with some successes. Unfortunately, progress in the development of therapeutic agents for heart failure management has been plodding. Omecamtiv mecarbil is a novel agent, recently granted Fast Track designation by the Food and Drug Administration for the potential treatment of chronic heart failure in HFrEF.

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM)
Myocardial contractility is at the core of HF progression, compromising cardiac output (CO), initially upon effort, and at rest in later stages of the disease [44]. Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a first in its class cardiac myosin activator that increases cardiac contractility via specifically binding to the catalytic S1 domain of cardiac myosin. Normally, the binding between myosin-adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and actin filaments is weak, until hydrolysis of ATP to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and inorganic phosphate (Pi) occurs. After that Pi is subsequently released from the myosin. The remaining myosin-ADP complex then remains firmly attached to the actin in a very stable force-generating complex. Its slow dissociation happens once the molecule of ATP binds myosin causing a conformational change. Hence, the hydrolysis of ATP to ADP-Pi and consequently, Pi release from myosin demonstrates a transition from a weakly actin-binding state to a strongly actin-binding state [6]. This transition is a rate-limiting step during the whole actin-myosin ATPase cycle [45]. Through the cardiac myosin activation, OM induces the conformational changes that augment the speed of ATP hydrolysis, which causes the release of Pi and accelerating the transition rate from a weakly bound to a firmly bound force-producing state. Physiologically, only about 10-30% of total cardiac myosin heads interact with actin filaments [46]. OM increases the proportion of myosin heads that are tightly bound to actin and creates a force-producing state that is independent of an increase in intracellular calcium [47]. Ultimately, OM prolongs total systole duration by augmenting the entry rate of myosin into a forcegenerating state. This increases the formation of active cross-bridges and thus, facilitating a stronger cardiac contraction.
OM has demonstrated benefit in reducing heart rate, peripheral vascular resistance, mean left arterial pressure, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in previous experimental canine studies. OM has also been shown to improve the CO, Stroke Volume, (SV) and systolic wall thickening. Besides OM was also shown to increase systolic ejection time (SET) as well as cardiac myocyte fractional shortening without a significant increase in LV dP/dtmax, myocardial oxygen consumption, and myocyte intracellular calcium [19].
The population that may benefit from OM was described in the GALACTIC-HF trial as those with EF of less than or equivalent to 28% [48]. Additionally, OM has demonstrated minimal limitations with typical adverse effects on heart rate, blood pressure, potassium homeostasis, and renal function observed with currently available HF therapies. Thus there may be benefits from OM therapy in that it may not interfere with initiation or up-titration of other essential therapies. Several phases 2 and 3 clinical trials conducted with Omecamtiv mecarbil to date are discussed (

Conclusions
OM provides a novel mechanism and therapeutic approach to managing patients with HF. Preclinical and clinical data demonstrated capability in improved cardiac function, decreased ventricular wall stress, the reversal of ventricular remodeling, and promotion of sympathetic withdrawal. Prior experimentation attempts at increasing cardiac contractility with oral agents in HF have resulted in an increased risk of mortality at pharmacologically effective doses. Via a novel mechanism of action, OM can increase cardiac contractility without predisposing patients to adverse effects seen with other inotropic agents. Additionally, OM has not demonstrated limitations such as adverse effects on blood pressure, heart rate, potassium homeostasis, or renal function that have typically limited the employment of the current HF therapies.
Ongoing and future clinical trials will continue to evaluate OM's value in HF therapy and its benefit in preventing HF events and CV death.

Conflicts of interest:
In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.