{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027128157156220765, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007483629560336763, 'mean_word_length': 5.149425287356322, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Evaluation of operator's quality using test "Manometers" implemented with the use of hard- and software Neurolab-2000M].

Purpose of the work was to correlate the quality parameters (speed and accuracy) of test Manometers implementation with the use of hard- and software Neurolab-2000M. The operator's quality parameters were latent reaction time (LRT) as a speed criterion, number of errors as an accuracy criterion, and speed and accuracy dependent time of task presentation (TP). The parameters were related by evaluation of statistical significance of calculated linear correlation coefficients Correlations between TP and LRT as well as between LRT and the number of errors were neither unique nor significant. On the opposite, TP and the number of errors were in direct correlation on the level of proximity and high statistical significance. These results suggest that, like the number of errors, TP can serve as a criterion of test completion accuracy. Regarding LRT, the parameter is not suitable for evaluation of accuracy of the Manometers test completion.