{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021965317919075144, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006936416184971098, 'mean_word_length': 5.055944055944056, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
‘Please don’t mind if I got this wrong’

Twelfth-century church lawyers employed concepts like spiritual marriage
 to justify norms regulating Christian life. In Medieval Marriage
 (2005), David d’Avray has argued that spiritual marriage was key to the
 notion of marriage as an unbreakable bond and exerted real influence
 on the domestic partnerships of Western Christians. The present chapter
 challenges this assertion, questioning (1) the contention that the related
 idea of canonical bigamy assumed shape under the decisive influence of
 theological tenets. The principle of matrimonial indissolubility is also
 discussed (2), again suggesting that spiritual marriage furnished juristic
 theory with just one rationale among many. Canonists drew on biblical
 imagery to reason by way of analogy but maintained much of their
 interpretive freedom in doing so.