{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036065573770491806, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012295081967213115, 'mean_word_length': 5.82122905027933, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Modern minimally invasive technologies in gynecological practice

Abstract. A comparison of surgical techniques (SILS, NOTES, Da Vinci robotic system, 3D modeling, Radius Surgical System) showed that they will provide endovideosurgery with new ways of performing surgical interventions in the near future. The aim of the research. Conducting a comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgical methods of treatment used in modern gynecological practice, as well as identifying their advantages and disadvantages, indications and contraindications for use, possible complications. Material and methods. A review of the data in PubMed, eLibrary, Cyberleninka, Scopus and WoS on the keywords “minimally invasive surgery”, “NOTESsurgery”, “SILS-surgery”, “Da Vinci system”, “3D modeling”, “gynecology” for 2016-2021 was performed. In addition, a manual search for articles in journals was carried out. Exclusion criteria from the analysis: description of individual clinical cases, books and documents. The final analysis included 60 sources out of 127 initially identified. Results. Minimally invasive surgical technologies have become the method of choice in the diagnosis and treatment of many gynecological pathologies