{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019570707070707072, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003787878787878788, 'mean_word_length': 6.044444444444444, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Intrinsic factors contributing to elevated intra-abdominal pressure.

Pelvic floor disorders affect 24% of US women, and elevated intra-abdominal pressure may cause pelvic injury through musculoskeletal strain. Activity restrictions meant to reduce pelvic strain after traumatic events, such as childbirth, have shown little benefit to patients. Reported high variability in abdominal pressure suggests that technique plays a substantial role in pressure generation. Understanding these techniques could inform evidence-based recommendations for protective pelvic care. We hypothesized use of a motion-capture methodology could identify four major contributors to elevated pressure: gravity, acceleration, abdominal muscle contraction, and respiration. Twelve women completed nineteen activities while instrumented for whole body motion capture, abdominal pressure, hip acceleration, and respiration volume. Correlation and partial least squares regression were utilized to determine primary technique factors that increase abdominal pressure. The partial least squares model identified two principal components that explained 59.63% of relative intra-abdominal pressure variability. The first component was primarily loaded by hip acceleration and relative respiration volume, and the second component was primarily loaded by flexion moments of the abdomen and thorax. While reducing abdominal muscle use has been a primary strategy in protective pelvic floor care, the influence of hip acceleration and breathing patterns should be considered with similar importance in future work.