{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015536723163841809, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.330357142857143, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
EXCEPTIONS TO THE GENERAL PATTERNS

In the preceding chapters we have used epidemiological methods to examine the long-term outcomes of early neurological illness. These have enabled us to identify the broad characteristics of the affected children and their illnesses that are associated with later outcome. However, individuals do not necessarily conform to the general picture that emerges. Some children, for example, had more impairment than might have been expected from their early histories, while others had less. We now ask whether closer scrutiny of the details of these children’s early clinical course would enable us to clarify further the conclusions reached from our epidemiological analyses.