{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03571428571428571, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022321428571428572, 'mean_word_length': 5.231481481481482, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of Mode of Presentation on Comprehension of below Average, Average and above Average Readers

300 subjects in Grades 4, 5, and 6 were randomly blocked into three conditions (reading only, listening only, or reading and listening) according to reading level (above average, average, and below average). The subjects were presented a 1500-word social studies passage and required to answer 25 multiple-choice questions concerning that passage. A 3 (grade) by 3 (reading level) by 3 (exposure condition) analysis of variance showed better performance by above average readers, poorest by those below average. Reading and listening and reading only gave higher scores.