{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028236914600550965, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014462809917355372, 'mean_word_length': 5.457777777777777, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Panitumumab Plus Irinotecan and Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan for KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM
Panitumumab and cetuximab are known to be effective treatments for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it remains unclear which of these two biologic agents confers the greatest benefit when combined with irinotecan in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
Data, from 139 patients who received panitumumab or cetuximab, in combination with irinotecan, for KRAS wild-type mCRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan were analyzed. The efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus irinotecan was compared to that of cetuximab plus irinotecan.


RESULTS
Baseline characteristics of the panitumumab plus irinotecan (n=42) and cetuximab plus irinotecan (n=97) groups were similar. Among patients with measurable lesions, the response rate was 34% in the panitumumab plus irinotecan group and 20% in the cetuximab plus irinotecan group. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 and 5.7 months in the panitumumab and cetuximab groups, respectively. Median overall survival was 13.6 months with panitumumab and 11.2 months with cetuximab.


CONCLUSION
Panitumumab plus irinotecan was well-tolerated and displayed a similar level of efficacy to that of cetuximab plus irinotecan.