{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024111675126903553, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005076142131979695, 'mean_word_length': 4.888059701492537, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparative study of 36 mm-diameter rope in five aerial ropeway installations using a non-destructive method

Visual inspection of wire rope is the most conventional method but it can be inadequate, especially for long rope. Non-destructive evaluation using magnetic methods is an important means for monitoring the performance of haulage rope. A rope tester, used to scan ropes, identifies the
 loss of metallic area (LMA) and discontinuities such as broken wires or localised faults (LFs). Performing non-destructive evaluation on a regular basis acts as a useful tool for recording the degradation of rope in the installation. In this paper, an attempt has been made to compare the conditions
 of 36 mm-diameter rope in five aerial ropeway installations using a non-destructive method.