{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05128205128205128, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023118957545187054, 'mean_word_length': 5.214099216710183, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Seizure Semiology, Location of Lesion on Neuroimaging, and Interictal Electroencephalographic (EEG) Abnormalities in Children With Single-Lesion Neurocysticercosis—Is There a Correlation?

Background: Single-lesion neurocysticercosis provides a model of seizure genesis secondary to an acquired lesion. We aimed to study the correlation of seizure semiology with the location of the lesion and interictal electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities in children with single-lesion neurocysticercosis. Methods: Prospective, observational study in children with single-lesion neurocysticercosis and seizures. Seizure classification was done after an interview with the parent/onlooker and the child. Localization and lateralization of the lesion were done by neuroimaging. The EEG abnormalities were classified based on their morphology and location. Results: Ninety-two children (7.9 ± 2.4 years) were included. Focal-onset seizures were the commonest (n = 54; 58.6%) seizures. Majority of the lesions were located in the frontal (n = 43; 47%) and parietal cortex (n = 34; 37%). EEG showed focal slowing (n = 15; 53.6%) and epileptiform spikes/spike-wave complexes (n = 13; 46.4%). There was a perfect agreement of clinical semiology with imaging lateralization (K = 1.0) and moderate agreement with imaging localization (K = 0.4). There was no significant agreement of clinical localization with EEG slowing (K = 0.1) or sharps (K = 0). There was moderate agreement (K = 0.6) of EEG slowing and substantial agreement (K = 0.7) of EEG sharps with clinical lateralization. Focal EEG slowing had moderate (K = 0.5) agreement with imaging lateralization. Focal sharps/spikes had substantial (K = 0.7) agreement with imaging lateralization. The positive predictive value (PPV) of seizure semiology for lateralization and localization was 100% and 68%, respectively. PVV of focal sharps for lateralization and localization was 84% and 70%, respectively. PPV of focal slowing for lateralization and localization was 77% and 65%, respectively. Conclusion: Seizure semiology in single-lesion neurocysticercosis correlates very well with lateralization but not so well with localization of lesion on neuroimaging. Focal EEG abnormalities are seen in nearly one-third of children with single-lesion neurocysticercosis. EEG often predicts the side of the lesion but has poor localizing value.