{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02240135765803988, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013152312261349173, 'mean_word_length': 4.986454453098544, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Inﬂuence of Lamina Density and Occurrence on the Permeability of Lamellar Shale after Hydration

: The characteristics of laminae in lamellar shale oil reservoirs have important inﬂuences on reservoir parameters, especially permeability. In order to explore the inﬂuence of lamina density and occurrence on the permeability of lamellar shale after hydration, we studied the lamellar shale in the Chang 7 member of the Yanchang Formation of Triassic in Ordos Basin. By comparing the permeability of bedding shale and lamellar shale with different densities of laminae, it was found that the permeability anisotropy of lamellar shale was stronger. In the direction parallel to the lamina, the permeability increased approximately linearly with an increase in lamina density. The effect of hydration on rock micropore structure and permeability was studied by soaking shale in different ﬂuids. Most of the microfracture in the lamellar shale was parallel to the lamina direction, and hydration led to a widening of the microfracture, which led to the most obvious increase in permeability parallel to the lamina. Collectively, the research results proved that lamina density, occurrence, and hydration have a signiﬁcant inﬂuence on the permeability anisotropy of lamellar shale.


Introduction
Shale permeability is an important parameter for productivity evaluation and economic development of shale reservoirs [1,2]. While a shale reservoir is usually dense, with low matrix permeability and high clay content, its permeability is greatly affected by bedding occurrence and hydration of rock [3][4][5]. The type of lamellar shale that has developed in the continental shale oil reservoirs in China contains a lot of silty and tuffaceous laminae, which lead to the development of microfractures and stronger shale anisotropy and is more vulnerable to hydration [6,7]. Under the influence of lamina density (the number of laminae contained in unit thickness stratum) and occurrence (the angle between the lamina plane and horizontal plane), the permeability law of lamellar shale becomes more complicated.
Shale anisotropy is related to the development of weak plane structure, which is an important factor affecting the physical and mechanical properties of rock [8][9][10]. The clay content of continental shale is high, and the changes of rock structure and properties caused by clay hydration and expansion are also the key points related to the study of shale [11,12]. The mechanical behavior of shale is significantly affected by anisotropy and 2 of 13 hydration [13,14]. In the process of water absorption, shale specimens mainly expand and fail parallel to the bedding plane. Water absorption parallel to the bedding plane will enhance the influence of anisotropy on the geological mechanical behavior of shale [15]. Gui et al. studied the effect of hydration on the anisotropic damage of shale and found that the damage of parallel bedding was greater than that of vertical bedding [16,17], and the damage occurred in the early stage of hydration [18]. For lamellar shale, the structure of laminae determines the reservoir quality and oil potential of the shale, and the permeability difference of shale exists in different laminae and different positions of the same lamina [19,20]. In addition, shale permeability is significantly affected by pressure, and the apparent permeability of shale increases significantly with a decrease in pressure, i.e., at low pressure [21][22][23].
The pore structure of shale is the main factor affecting the storage capacity and production performance of shale gas reservoirs [24][25][26]. Shale contains a large number of nanoscale pores, and the abundance and maturity of organic matter are the main factors controlling the micropore structure of shale [27]. Zhang et al. quantitatively divided fluid occurrence and pore system in the shale of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin and discussed the impact of disconnected pores on shale gas development [28]. Jiang et al. believed that the pore and fracture evolution process of shale under triaxial stress conditions could be divided into an initial stage, expansion stage, and permeability stage [29]. The characteristics of the micropore structure of shale are important factors that determine the permeability of the shale. Observations by scanning electron microscope have found that microfractures and a large number of intergranular pores occur parallel to the shale bedding plane, which all create the main channel for fluid flow [30]. The intergranular pores tend to be aligned, and the clay mineral particles parallel to the bedding are preferentially aligned [31]. After water saturation, the connectivity of the entire shale pore-fracture system is significantly increased, and the microfractures show a preferred direction or arrangement parallel to the shale bedding plane [32]. Hydration can promote the expansion of original fractures, and also induce new microfractures or branches [33], and the direction of bedding is the main factor controlling the direction of fracture propagation [34]. Hydration is conducive to fracturing shale gas reservoirs, to achieve the goal of increasing production [35].
At present, studies on the permeability characteristics of shale have mainly revolved around bedding shale, and there have been few studies on the permeability law of lamellar shale. In particular, the existing studies have not revealed the influence of the characteristics of lamina density and occurrence on rock permeability before and after hydration. Therefore, the lamellar shale in the third submember of the Chang 7 of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin was used as the research object. The polarizing microscope and scanning electron microscopes were used to observe the micropore structure changes before and after hydration of the shale. Combined with experimental tests, the influence of the development characteristics of lamina and hydration time on rock porosity and permeability were analyzed, which provided support for the drilling and development of lamellar shale oil reservoirs.

Samples
Ordos Basin is one of the main oil and gas resource reservoir basins in China. Among them, the third submember of the Chang 7 member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation is a lamellar shale oil reservoir, mainly composed of shale, containing a small amount of siltstone and tuff. A large section of shale contains siltstone laminae, leading to the development of microfractures in the reservoir and strong rock anisotropy. The mineral composition of the reservoir is diverse, in which the contents of clay and quartz are prominent. The average content of clay is 31%, and some layers can reach 44% clay. The clay is mainly composed of illite and illite/smectite mixed layers ( Figure 1).
There are lamellar shale and bedding shale (shale without laminae) in the whole reservoir. In the lamellar shale, the distances between laminae are also different, which is expressed by the lamina density in this research. In order to explore the effect of lamina density on permeability, bedding shale and lamellar shale with different densities of lamina were taken as experimental objects. In order to explore the permeability anisotropy, samples with different angles between the axial direction and the lamina plane were taken as the experimental objects ( Figure 2).

Experimental Programs and Methods
In order to study shale micropore structure before and after hydration, three rock thin sections were treated, respectively, with no soaking, water soaking at 90 °C for 48 h, and water-based drilling fluid soaking at 90 °C for 48 h, and then the rock thin section observation was performed to compare and analyze the samples before and after hydration. Similarly, three micro square core samples were treated, respectively, with no soaking, water soaking at 90 °C for 24 h, and water-based drilling fluid soaking at 90 °C for 24 h, and the micropore structure before and after hydration was observed by scanning electron microscope. There are lamellar shale and bedding shale (shale without laminae) in the whole reservoir. In the lamellar shale, the distances between laminae are also different, which is expressed by the lamina density in this research. In order to explore the effect of lamina density on permeability, bedding shale and lamellar shale with different densities of lamina were taken as experimental objects. In order to explore the permeability anisotropy, samples with different angles between the axial direction and the lamina plane were taken as the experimental objects ( Figure 2). There are lamellar shale and bedding shale (shale without laminae) in the whole reservoir. In the lamellar shale, the distances between laminae are also different, which is expressed by the lamina density in this research. In order to explore the effect of lamina density on permeability, bedding shale and lamellar shale with different densities of lamina were taken as experimental objects. In order to explore the permeability anisotropy, samples with different angles between the axial direction and the lamina plane were taken as the experimental objects ( Figure 2).

Experimental Programs and Methods
In order to study shale micropore structure before and after hydration, three rock thin sections were treated, respectively, with no soaking, water soaking at 90 °C for 48 h, and water-based drilling fluid soaking at 90 °C for 48 h, and then the rock thin section observation was performed to compare and analyze the samples before and after hydration. Similarly, three micro square core samples were treated, respectively, with no soaking, water soaking at 90 °C for 24 h, and water-based drilling fluid soaking at 90 °C for 24 h, and the micropore structure before and after hydration was observed by scanning electron microscope.

Experimental Programs and Methods
In order to study shale micropore structure before and after hydration, three rock thin sections were treated, respectively, with no soaking, water soaking at 90 • C for 48 h, and water-based drilling fluid soaking at 90 • C for 48 h, and then the rock thin section observation was performed to compare and analyze the samples before and after hydration. Similarly, three micro square core samples were treated, respectively, with no soaking, water soaking at 90 • C for 24 h, and water-based drilling fluid soaking at 90 • C for 24 h, Crystals 2021, 11, 1524 4 of 13 and the micropore structure before and after hydration was observed by scanning electron microscope.
In order to study the effect of hydration on rock porosity, 4 samples were taken; 2 samples were soaked in 80 • C water, and 2 samples were soaked in 80 • C water-based drilling fluid. Their initial porosity and porosity after 12, 24, 36, and 48 h of soaking were tested, sequentially.
In order to study the influence of lamina density on the permeability of hydrated shale, samples with different densities of lamina and occurrences were used to test their initial permeability and the permeability after soaking in water and water-based drilling fluid for 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. The water-based drilling fluid in this experiment was an inhibitory water-based drilling fluid with amino inhibitor and nanosilica.

Observation Experiment of Rock Thin Section
When colored liquid glue is injected into rock pore space under vacuum pressure, the pore characteristics of a sample can be observed with a microscope after the liquid glue is cured [36]. In this study, the rock was prepared in 0.5 mm thin sections by grinding, and then blue glue was injected into the rock thin sections by a ZT-2 high pressure casting instrument. Finally, the fracture and pore structure of the rock thin sections were observed under a BX51-P-DP12 polarizing microscope.

Core Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis Experiment
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) can emit electrons and receive reaction signals from the observed samples, and these signals can characterize certain physical or chemical properties of the rock surface, which is an important method for studying rock pore structure [37]. In this study, the rock was processed into the micro square core with a side length of 1 cm through a sander and an LEICA EM TIC 3X three-ion beam cutter. The LEICA EM ACE 200 type coating instrument was used to spray gold on the observation surface to ensure a clear image during observation and the sample was observed by FEI Quanta 650 FEG field emission scanning electron microscope.

Porosity Experiment
At a constant temperature, the pressure and volume of the gas are inversely proportional, and the total porosity of the rock can be measured by the dual-chamber method [33]. An HEP-P porosity tester was used to test rock porosity. Before the experiment, the cylindrical core of the measured size was put into the sample chamber, and helium was added into the reference chamber at a predetermined pressure (100~200 psi). After the pressure was balanced, the pressure P1 was read out. Then, the gas expanded into the sample chamber, and the pressure measured after equilibrium was P2. The total porosity of the rock could be calculated by Equation (1) [38] as follows: where Φ is the porosity of the test sample, V 00 is the volume of the test sample, V C is the volume of the reference chamber, V Y is the volume of the sample chamber, P 1 is the first balance pressure, and P 2 is the second balance pressure.

Permeability Experiment
According to Darcy's law, the seepage velocity of porous media is directly proportional to the cross-sectional area, pressure difference, and permeability, and inversely proportional to the viscosity and length of the porous media [39]. In the experiment, shale permeability was tested using a Gasperm steady-state gas permeability meter, with a test temperature of 20 • C and a pressure of 230 psi. The permeability ratio of the parallel lamina and the vertical lamina was used to express the permeability anisotropy of the lamellar shale [40].  Figure 3 shows the results of rock thin sections before and after soaking. From the results, it could be concluded that the microfracture in samples developed parallel to the lamina or at a small angle with the lamina whether soaking or not. As compared with that before soaking (Figure 3a), the microfracture in the rock after soaking in water expanded and widened, and new fractures were generated nearby (Figure 3b). The samples soaked in drilling fluid were covered and blocked by argillaceous and solid particles in the drilling fluid, and there were no obvious fractures on the surface (Figure 3c).  Figure 3 shows the results of rock thin sections before and after soaking. From the results, it could be concluded that the microfracture in samples developed parallel to the lamina or at a small angle with the lamina whether soaking or not. As compared with that before soaking (Figure 3a), the microfracture in the rock after soaking in water expanded and widened, and new fractures were generated nearby (Figure 3b). The samples soaked in drilling fluid were covered and blocked by argillaceous and solid particles in the drilling fluid, and there were no obvious fractures on the surface (Figure 3c).     Figure 3 shows the results of rock thin sections before and after soaking. From the results, it could be concluded that the microfracture in samples developed parallel to the lamina or at a small angle with the lamina whether soaking or not. As compared with that before soaking (Figure 3a), the microfracture in the rock after soaking in water expanded and widened, and new fractures were generated nearby (Figure 3b). The samples soaked in drilling fluid were covered and blocked by argillaceous and solid particles in the drilling fluid, and there were no obvious fractures on the surface (Figure 3c).

Experimental Results of Porosity
After testing the initial total porosity of the samples, the samples were soaked in water at 80 °C or drilling fluid at 80 °C for different periods of time. After drying, the porosity results of samples could be observed, as shown in Figure 5. From the results of the porosity experiments, it could be seen that the porosity of shale reservoirs increased with an increase in soaking time, indicating that shale hydration would increase porosity. The porosity of the lamellar shale soaked in water changed significantly with an increase in time, while the change range of the lamellar shale soaked in drilling fluid was relatively stable with an increase in time. In bedding shale, there were similar laws, which indicated that the type of soaking liquid had an important influence on the porosity change of shale after hydrated. In the first 12 h of water soaking, the lamellar shale sample increased from an initial porosity of 1.65% to 2.51%, and the bedding shale sample increased from an initial porosity of 0.66% to 1.24. During the period of 36-48 h of soaking in water, the porosity of the lamellar shale sample only increased from 2.91% to 2.95%, and the porosity of the bedding shale sample only increased from 1.44% to 1.45%. The change of porosity mainly occurred in the early stage of soaking, and the porosity remained basically unchanged at the later stage of soaking, which meant that the porosity of samples increased nonlinearly with an increase in soaking time. As compared with the porosity changes in the samples, it was found that drilling fluid reduced the rate of porosity growth, indicating that the drilling fluid weakened the hydration of the core.

Experimental Results of Porosity
After testing the initial total porosity of the samples, the samples were soaked in water at 80 • C or drilling fluid at 80 • C for different periods of time. After drying, the porosity results of samples could be observed, as shown in Figure 5. From the results of the porosity experiments, it could be seen that the porosity of shale reservoirs increased with an increase in soaking time, indicating that shale hydration would increase porosity. The porosity of the lamellar shale soaked in water changed significantly with an increase in time, while the change range of the lamellar shale soaked in drilling fluid was relatively stable with an increase in time. In bedding shale, there were similar laws, which indicated that the type of soaking liquid had an important influence on the porosity change of shale after hydrated. In the first 12 h of water soaking, the lamellar shale sample increased from an initial porosity of 1.65% to 2.51%, and the bedding shale sample increased from an initial porosity of 0.66% to 1.24. During the period of 36-48 h of soaking in water, the porosity of the lamellar shale sample only increased from 2.91% to 2.95%, and the porosity of the bedding shale sample only increased from 1.44% to 1.45%. The change of porosity mainly occurred in the early stage of soaking, and the porosity remained basically unchanged at the later stage of soaking, which meant that the porosity of samples increased nonlinearly with an increase in soaking time. As compared with the porosity changes in the samples, it was found that drilling fluid reduced the rate of porosity growth, indicating that the drilling fluid weakened the hydration of the core.

Experimental Results of Hydration Permeability under the Different Lamin sities
The lamina density was related to the sampling angle, and the lamina density ding shale was zero. When the 50 × 25 mm cylinder samples were drilled at the sam in the full diameter core, the lamina density in 45° and 90° samples was simila was twice that in 0° samples. The experimental results of permeability with differ sities of lamin ( Figure 6) showed that shale permeability increased with an inc lamina density, whether in water or drilling fluid. The permeability increased with an increase in lamina density, especially in the direction parallel to the When sampling at 0° (Figure 6a), the permeability increased significantly with an in the lamina density, but the influence of fluid type was not great, indicating lamina density had a greater impact on the hydration permeability of the shale wh pling at 0° than the soaking fluid type. When sampling at 45° (Figure 6b), the perm change caused by lamina density from 0 to 2 was not obvious, but the change obvious when the lamina density increased to 4. When sampling at 90°, the inc permeability of samples soaked in water was significantly higher than that of soaked in drilling fluid, while the increase in permeability caused by an increase in density was much lower than that when the sample angles were 0° and 45°. Th showed that, when the sampling angle was 90°, the influence of hydration on the ability of lamellar shale was greater than that of lamina density, and the type of fluid played a leading role in the permeability change of lamellar shale.

Experimental Results of Hydration Permeability under the Different Lamina Densities
The lamina density was related to the sampling angle, and the lamina density of bedding shale was zero. When the 50 × 25 mm cylinder samples were drilled at the same place in the full diameter core, the lamina density in 45 • and 90 • samples was similar, which was twice that in 0 • samples. The experimental results of permeability with different densities of lamin ( Figure 6) showed that shale permeability increased with an increase in lamina density, whether in water or drilling fluid. The permeability increased linearly with an increase in lamina density, especially in the direction parallel to the laminae. When sampling at 0 • (Figure 6a), the permeability increased significantly with an increase in the lamina density, but the influence of fluid type was not great, indicating that the lamina density had a greater impact on the hydration permeability of the shale when sampling at 0 • than the soaking fluid type. When sampling at 45 • (Figure 6b), the permeability change caused by lamina density from 0 to 2 was not obvious, but the change became obvious when the lamina density increased to 4. When sampling at 90 • , the increase in permeability of samples soaked in water was significantly higher than that of samples soaked in drilling fluid, while the increase in permeability caused by an increase in lamina density was much lower than that when the sample angles were 0 • and 45 • . The result showed that, when the sampling angle was 90 • , the influence of hydration on the permeability of lamellar shale was greater than that of lamina density, and the type of soaking fluid played a leading role in the permeability change of lamellar shale.

Experimental Results of Hydration Permeability under Different Occurrences
The experimental results of hydration permeability under different sampling angles (Figure 7) showed that the permeability after hydration decreased with an increase in the sampling angle. The permeability was the largest at 0 • and the permeability at 90 • was the smallest, that is, under the same lamina density, the permeability in the parallel lamina direction was the largest, and the permeability in the vertical lamina direction was the smallest. The permeability growth rate of samples in drilling fluid was smaller than that of samples in water at the same lamina density and sampling angle, especially when the sampling angle was 0 • , which proved that drilling fluid had the best effect on inhibiting the permeability growth in the parallel lamina direction. The permeability of lamellar shale had a larger variation range than that of bedding shale, which proved that the existence of laminae increased the influence of hydration on rock permeability. When the sampling angle increased, the permeability dropped sharply, while the influence of fluid type was relatively small. It showed that the influence of lamina direction on the shale permeability after hydration was greater than that of the soaking fluid type.

Experimental Results of Hydration Permeability under Different Occurrences
The experimental results of hydration permeability under different sampling angles (Figure 7) showed that the permeability after hydration decreased with an increase in the sampling angle. The permeability was the largest at 0° and the permeability at 90° was the smallest, that is, under the same lamina density, the permeability in the parallel lamina direction was the largest, and the permeability in the vertical lamina direction was the smallest. The permeability growth rate of samples in drilling fluid was smaller than that of samples in water at the same lamina density and sampling angle, especially when the sampling angle was 0°, which proved that drilling fluid had the best effect on inhibiting the permeability growth in the parallel lamina direction. The permeability of lamellar shale had a larger variation range than that of bedding shale, which proved that the exist-

Experimental Results of Hydration Permeability under Different Soaking Times
The experimental results of hydration permeability under different soaking times (Figure 8) showed that shale permeability increased with an increase in soaking time, which proved that hydration would increase the permeability of shale oil reservoir rocks. When the lamina density in the lamellar shale sample was one, the permeability of lamellar shale changed nonlinearly with soaking time. The permeability of lamellar shale increased from 4.27 mD to 6.93 mD after soaking in water for 12 h, and the permeability of lamellar shale only increased from 6.93 mD to 7.15 mD after soaking in water for 12-48 h, which indicated that the influence of hydration on the permeability of lamellar shale mainly occurred in the early stage. Under the same soaking time and lamina direction, the permeability of samples soaked in drilling fluid was less than that in water, indicating that the drilling fluid could inhibit the hydration of shale.
Crystals 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 14 ence of laminae increased the influence of hydration on rock permeability. When the sampling angle increased, the permeability dropped sharply, while the influence of fluid type was relatively small. It showed that the influence of lamina direction on the shale permeability after hydration was greater than that of the soaking fluid type.
(a) (b) Figure 7. Permeability under the different sampling angles: (a) The relationship between permeability and sampling angle of lamellar shale, the lamina density with sampling angle of 0° is 1, the lamina density with sampling angle of 45° and 90° is 2; (b) the relationship between permeability and sampling angle of bedding shale.

Experimental Results of Hydration Permeability under Different Soaking Times
The experimental results of hydration permeability under different soaking times ( Figure 8) showed that shale permeability increased with an increase in soaking time, which proved that hydration would increase the permeability of shale oil reservoir rocks. When the lamina density in the lamellar shale sample was one, the permeability of lamellar shale changed nonlinearly with soaking time. The permeability of lamellar shale increased from 4.27 mD to 6.93 mD after soaking in water for 12 h, and the permeability of lamellar shale only increased from 6.93 mD to 7.15 mD after soaking in water for 12-48 h, which indicated that the influence of hydration on the permeability of lamellar shale mainly occurred in the early stage. Under the same soaking time and lamina direction, the permeability of samples soaked in drilling fluid was less than that in water, indicating that the drilling fluid could inhibit the hydration of shale. Water-0h Drilling fluid-0h Water-12h Drilling fluid-12h Water-24h Drilling fluid-24h Water-36h Drilling fluid-36h Water-48h Drilling fluid-48h Permeability (mD) Sampling angle (°) Water-0h Drilling fluid-0h Water-12h Drilling fluid-12h Water-24h Drilling fluid-24h Water-36h Drilling fluid-36h Water-48h Drilling fluid-48h Permeability (mD) Sampling angle (°)

The Relationship between Hydration Micropore Structure and Permeability
There were a lot of clastic minerals in continental lamellar shale oil reservoir, and the cementation ability between minerals was weak. After soaking, clastic minerals were easy to fall off the rock surface, which increased the micropores in the rock and the appearance

The Relationship between Hydration Micropore Structure and Permeability
There were a lot of clastic minerals in continental lamellar shale oil reservoir, and the cementation ability between minerals was weak. After soaking, clastic minerals were easy to fall off the rock surface, which increased the micropores in the rock and the appearance of new pores further aggravated rock hydration. The content of clay minerals in the reservoir was high; after the clay was soaked in water, the cementing ability decreased, and the minerals attached to the clay easily fell off, further aggravating the internal hydration of the rock. When the fracture made contact with the fluid, the hydration further increased the length and opening of the fracture, resulting in a high permeability fracture net.
The drilling fluid formed a protective mud cake on the rock surface, which could reduce the contact area between the fluid and the rock, enhanced the cementing ability of minerals and clays, and inhibited the hydration of the rock surface. Solid particles and soil powder accumulated in fractures, reduced the permeability of fractures, reduced the contact between the fracture surface and the drilling fluid, and inhibited the internal hydration of the rock. The hydration inhibitor in the drilling fluid reduced the hydration expansion and dispersion ability of the clay, and reduced the osmotic hydration of shale [41]. The use of inhibitory drilling fluids in drilling operations can effectively ensure the stability of the wellbore.

Considering the Influence Mechanism of Shale Lamina Occurrence and Density on Permeability
The degree of laminar microfracture development was the main factor affecting expansion, providing channels for fluid to enter the rock, which greatly increased the contact between fluid and rock. When the laminae and microfractures met water, the weak cementation surface between different lithologies was easy to separate and form fractures. The greater the lamina density, the larger the contact area between fluid and rock, resulting in an increase in porosity and permeability.
The micropore structure of lamellar shale showed that microfractures that provided permeability for the rock were mainly developed parallel to the lamina and distributed near the lamina interface, resulting in an increase in rock permeability with an increase om lamina density, which was consistent with the experimental results of permeability. After being hydrated, it was also easy to produce new fractures near the lamina interface, which further increased the permeability of the rock parallel to the laminar direction. The permeability of rock in the lamina direction was significantly higher than that in the direction normal to the lamina, which was the reason for the anisotropic increase in permeability of lamellar shale after hydration. Figure 9 shows the permeability anisotropy of shale under different lamina densities and different fluid soaking conditions. It can be seen that the relationship between permeability anisotropy of shale and soaking time is not a simple positive correlation or negative correlation, which is related to the changes in micropore structure of rocks in different fluids and different soaking time periods. The lamellar shale had a larger change in permeability anisotropy than bedding shale. Among them, the changes in permeability anisotropy for lamellar shale and bedding shale soaked in water for 48 h were 3.35 and 0.17, respectively, which proved that the shale containing laminae would increase the permeability anisotropy. Under the same lithology and lamina development, the influence of drilling fluid on the permeability anisotropy of the sample was less than that in water, which proved that hydration increased the permeability anisotropy of shale oil reservoir rocks. This effect could be reduced by adding drilling fluids with inhibitors and plugging agents. 0.17, respectively, which proved that the shale containing laminae would increase the permeability anisotropy. Under the same lithology and lamina development, the influence of drilling fluid on the permeability anisotropy of the sample was less than that in water, which proved that hydration increased the permeability anisotropy of shale oil reservoir rocks. This effect could be reduced by adding drilling fluids with inhibitors and plugging agents. Figure 9. The influence of different lamina developments and soaking fluids on permeability anisotropy, the lamina density with sampling angle of 0° is 1, the lamina density with sampling angle of 90° is 2.

Conclusions
In this study, we took the shale oil reservoir core of the third submember of the Chang 7 member in the Ordos Basin as the research object. We analyzed the micropore structure of the rock before and after hydration through rock thin section identification and scanning electron microscope, and tested the development characteristics of the lamina and the influence of hydration on rock permeability. The results are as follows: 1. The lamina density and occurrence had a significant impact on the permeability of shale. The permeability of the rock increased approximately linearly with the lamina density, especially in the direction parallel to the laminae. The occurrence of laminae was the main reason for the permeability anisotropy of rock, and the permeability

Conclusions
In this study, we took the shale oil reservoir core of the third submember of the Chang 7 member in the Ordos Basin as the research object. We analyzed the micropore structure of the rock before and after hydration through rock thin section identification and scanning electron microscope, and tested the development characteristics of the lamina and the influence of hydration on rock permeability. The results are as follows: 1.
The lamina density and occurrence had a significant impact on the permeability of shale. The permeability of the rock increased approximately linearly with the lamina density, especially in the direction parallel to the laminae. The occurrence of laminae was the main reason for the permeability anisotropy of rock, and the permeability parallel to the lamina direction could reach ten times the permeability in the direction normal to the lamina.

2.
After the lamellar shale was soaked in water, the dissolution pores between the rock particles became more obvious. There were stratifications inside the rock and the fractures along the laminae became longer and wider. The change of this structure led to a significant increase in permeability, especially in the direction parallel to the lamina.

3.
With an increase in hydration time, the permeability of rock showed a trend that first increased and then tended to be stable. As compared with bedding shale, the permeability of lamellar shale was more susceptible to hydration, and the shale permeability in the direction parallel to the laminae was more susceptible to hydration.