{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03946102021174206, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004812319538017324, 'mean_word_length': 5.341463414634147, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
So... What Is Enlightenment? An Inquisition into Modernity

When in 1983 Michel Foucault invited a small group of friends and colleagues-Richard Rorty, Hubert Dreyfus, Charles Taylor, and Jtirgen Habermas-to consider a private colloquium to be held at Berkeley on the subject of Kant's essay "An Answer to the Question: 'What Is Enlightenment?'"'1 he was nearing the end of one of the most remarkable and, to many, incomprehensible "turns" in recent intellectual history. Throughout his career, Foucault had been at pains to reject in the most uncompromising terms Kant's account of the conditions of knowledge, the autonomy of the subject, and the universalizing rule of reason-all of which could be taken as historical errors, metaphysical masks worn by "discourse" or "disciplinary regimes." But having established himself securely in a philosophical genealogy that extended from Nietzsche and Heidegger to Lacan, Lyotard, Deleuze, Derrida, and other thinkers of the "counter-Enlightenment," Foucault sought not just to rehabilitate the