{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029077117572692796, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014538558786346398, 'mean_word_length': 4.951127819548872, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Oral Iron Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Usage, Tolerance, and Efficacy

BackgroundIron deficiency is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Anecdotal evidence suggests that oral iron is poorly tolerated and may exacerbate disease activity in patients with IBD. AimThe aim of this study was to retrospectively compare usage, tolerance, and efficacy of oral iron therapy in patients with IBD and noninflammatory causes of iron deficiency. MethodsCase records of 277 patients with IBD and 24 non-IBD iron-deficient control patients covering a 4-year period were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsFifty-three of 277 (19%) of the patients with IBD studied had received oral iron. In only 40% of the patients who had IBD and 63% of the patients who did not (p = not significant) was iron deficiency formally confirmed before treatment. Intolerance to iron was reported in only 25% of the patients who had IBD and 17% of the patients who did not (p = not significant). In only two of eight adequately monitored iron-intolerant patients with IBD was iron therapy associated with an increase in inflammatory markers. When formally checked, iron repletion was successfully achieved as frequently in patients who had IBD (59%) as in patients who did not (45%). ConclusionIron therapy is often used without a formal diagnosis of iron deficiency having been made, at least in part because of the difficulty in making this diagnosis using ferritin, an acute-phase protein. Patients with IBD are no more intolerant of oral iron than other patients and have similar rates of repletion.