{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023291925465838508, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.515151515151516, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Assessing Process and Outcomes: Evaluating Community-Based Participatory Research

• Although the projects varied in the measures of the partnership process, the three teams that had the highest outcome scores also had the highest scores for the partnership process. • In the area of process, teams had the most difficulty conducting the data analysis collaboratively, sharing power, and managing the impact of turnover. • In the area of outcomes, teams were most effective at improving the quality of research methodology, providing benefits to the participating community agency, and answering questions important to the communities involved.