{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017543859649122806, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.6938775510204085, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Decision-making process by multi-criteria hierarchical analysis for the appraisal of entrepreneurial projects

This research aims to develop a design for the selection of entrepreneurship projects using a multi-criteria decision method. The Design Science Research (DSR) approach is used through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a methodology applied to entrepreneurship projects in accounting. The results obtained correspond to the hierarchical multi-criteria design, the application of which has allowed the establishment of a ranking of the best entrepreneurial projects analyzed. The work systematizes the decision-making process by proposing a structure of criteria and sub-criteria that applies David McClelland's characteristics of entrepreneurial success and the stages to be followed for the evaluation of projects, avoiding decision-making processes that rely on intuition or that oversimplify the variables to be considered. The relevance and originality of the work focuses on the study of the decision-making process in a relatively unstudied area such as entrepreneurship, considering the greater organizational complexity. This work enables the optimization of the decision-making process in the entities and bodies responsible for evaluating and granting funding to this type of project.