{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02242152466367713, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004484304932735426, 'mean_word_length': 5.526315789473684, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Alternative Indications for Corneal Crosslinking.

Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is the current mainstay treatment for progressive keratoconus. In the past 15 years, a variety of other indications have been tested. A systematic review was conducted to examine these alternative indications for CXL. In total, of 143 papers on crosslinking as a treatment for infectious keratitis, bullous keratopathy, pellucid marginal degeneration, post- laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ectasia, and as a way to improve vision either on its own or in combination with other interventions were included. Post-LASIK ectasia is a definite indication for crosslinking. Surprisingly, only limited research has been performed on pellucid marginal degeneration, with no randomized trials available to date. Other interesting applications are the combined use of refractive lasers and crosslinking for suspicious or ectatic corneas and crosslinking as a standalone intervention for minor refractive errors. CXL might offer a solution for refractory bacterial keratitis. In bullous keratopathy, it seems to offer only a transient benefit.