{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030364372469635626, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006072874493927126, 'mean_word_length': 5.067484662576687, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
How Can We Explain Very Low Odds Ratios in GWAS? I. Polygenic Models

Genome-wide association studies of common diseases often identify a number of disease-related SNPs that reach highly significant p values but at the same time show very low disease odds ratios (ORs), most <1.5 and many <1.2. Despite their statistical significance, associations involving very low ORs explain little about the genetic contribution to the disease and nothing about disease inheritance. A commonly accepted explanation for very low ORs involves a model of polygenic inheritance, i.e., where the disease being studied is caused by a large number of interacting genes, each gene contributing only a small increment to disease risk. Here we demonstrate the perhaps counterintuitive result that, within a reasonable range of disease population prevalences (≤10%), a pure polygenic model is incompatible with very low ORs, unless very large numbers (hundreds or even thousands) of polygenic loci are involved.