{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031951412727752836, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01399524689728017, 'mean_word_length': 5.111888111888112, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Psychological Well-being and Personality Mental Health

Wellbeing is a multifaceted phenomenon with regard to its conceptualization, fields of application, discourse practices and a great number of components. Its greatest advantage resides in health improvement and lifespan increment. Health can be considered as a source of physical and mental force, as an adaptive ability of the organism, an ideal and meaning of life, an ideal state of the individual who feels well. The aim of the study was to examine socio-psychological features of the respondents with different degrees of subjective wellbeing and health self-esteem pronouncement. As a result, the four groups involving 202 testees were singled out. The survey showed that both health self-esteem and subjective wellbeing serve as predictors not only of attitude towards the world and the self but also as a certain “frame” through the prism of which the person perceives the world around. It was revealed that the respondents with low health self-esteem are emotionally unstable, prone to neuroticism and dissatisfaction with their life in general. The group of the testees with high health self-esteem and high level of subjective wellbeing are characterized by proactive attitude, a zest for life, positive self-esteem, lack of sustainable tension, while the respondents with low level of subjective wellbeing and low health self-esteem exhibit an increased level of neuroticism, significance of their social environment and preoccupation with their own emotional sensations. The search for individual and typological specific features depending on the person’s subjective perceptions about his health and wellbeing allows for revealing idiosyncratic “syndromes” of individual consciousness.


Introduction
Wellbeing is a multidimensional concept in terms of its conceptualization, fields of application, discourse practices and a great number of components. Over the last decades the concept wellbeing has come into academic use and offered the groundwork for mental health understanding [24].
The term "wellbeing" allowed psychologists to "de-medicalise" the concept of health [22], to consider the quality of life separately from the idea of a disease [10] and mental health as a syndrome of feeling well [12,13].
The greatest advantage of psychological wellbeing resides in health improvement and longevity increment. Happy people suffer less from many diseases and live longer, on average [4,15]. It is worth mentioning that this indicator was reproduced in monkeys, and happier orangutans appeared to live longer than their less happy companions [23].
One of the reasons indicating a positive impact of psychological wellbeing on mental health and life longevity is the fact that people with high level of wellbeing demonstrate health-saving behavior [6], they exhibit stronger immune and cardio-vascular systems [19]. Positive emotions compared to neutral and negative ones contribute to such physiological parameters as cortisone and blood pressure [2,11,20]. For example, when a person is in a good humor after a hard working day his cardio-vascular system quicker recovers its original level [7].
Subjective wellbeing is defined as general people' assessment of their life and emotional states. Thus, subjective wellbeing embraces wide in scale estimates of life and health satisfaction as well as particular feelings which reflect how people react to their life events and circumstances. The "subjective" is what people feel and sensate.
Subjective well-being comprises both cognitive and emotional components. Interrelations between these two components attest that satisfaction at cognitive level is accompanied by sensing emotional well-being ([25]. P. 161).
The problems of mental health have been in the focus of research for the last years especially in the context of the concept of wellbeing. Health can be considered as a source of physical and mental force, as an adaptive ability of the organism, an ideal and meaning of life, an ideal state of the individual who feels well.
Health is inseparable from the notion happiness and subjective wellbeing. Happy people are typically healthier and live longer. However, on the other hand, healthy people can be unhappy, nervous and have an idea of ill-being. DOI  self-esteem is economically inert and older than the average representative of other groups. His education level is considerably lower (9 grades at best). His income is also lower. While the average male with a low self-esteem is married only 49% married among the sampling's females. The authors also emphasize the problem of unconscious distortion of health self-esteem and its subjectivity. Subjectivity means that individuals with one and the same health status can evaluate it in a different way since they consider different answers to be the norm. One person can perceive his normal health as "average" whereas the other one as "good" [8,14].

Methodology
The aim of the study was to examine socio-psychological features of the respondents with different degrees of subjective wellbeing and health self-esteem pronouncement.
At the first stage of the study the sample consisted of 427 testees equalized by gender and education level (48% females and 52% males). 46% of them had post and under graduate degrees, 54% with secondary and secondary professional education.
Psycho-diagnostic tests resulted in identifying four groups of the respondents (202 testees) with different degrees of subjective wellbeing and health self-esteem pronouncement: • group 1: the respondents with low level of subjective wellbeing and low health self-esteem; • group 2: the respondents with high level of subjective wellbeing and low health self-esteem; DOI  The data were processed with the help of correlation (Pearson rank correlation coefficient) and factor analysis (principle component analysis), which allowed for using "SPSS 11.0" package.

Results
At the first stage of the data processing the comparative analysis of the four respondents' groups was carried out: The average age of group 1 respondents was 34. 8  The second group of the respondents was made up of the majority of males (67.3%), with the average age of 39.2 and secondary and secondary professional education (61%).
The respondents of this group were characterized by low health self-esteem and high level of subjective wellbeing, which can testify to infantilism and emotional immaturity. The presence of defense mechanism of denying problems, a somewhat "blind eye" to really existing negative aspects of the situation occurred can be assumed. High correlation between such indicators as changes in mood and health selfesteem was found (r=0.298, p<0.05). It is likely to imply low level of problem awareness and a lack of ability to assess one's own state objectively.
The third group was the most numerous, the average age of 50.8, with prevalence of males (63.3%) and secondary and secondary professional education (59.1%). This group representatives exhibit the lack of spontaneity, good self-control, commitment to socially accepted norms of behavior, conformism. It allows for assuming that sociability manifests itself in customary contacts and is coupled with the need for recognition by those who matter much. The second group allowed for identifying three factors. The first factor "Neuroticism" accounts for 46.6% of the total variance and incorporates these scales: tension and sensitivity.90, basic psycho-emotional symptoms.87. The given factor reflects personality immersion in emotional sensations. The second factor "Satisfaction with life" (its contribution to the total variance was 21.6%) was presented by the scale satisfaction with everyday activities.97. The third factor "Health self-esteem" (13.7% of the total variance) was represented by the scale health self esteem.61.
Four significant factors were revealed in the third group. The first factor "Emotional Breadth" (36.6%) was represented by these scales: significance of social environment.91, changes in mood.66. The second factor (19.9%) was formed by the scale basic psycho-emotional symptoms.95, which allowed for treating it as "Neuroticism".
The third factor "Anxiety" (13.5%) was formed by the scale tension and sensitivity.93.
The fourth factor "Life completeness"(9.7%) was made of satisfaction with everyday activities.93.
Four factors were singled out in the forth group, and they account for 25.0%; 15.6%; 11.2% and 8.5% of the total variance accordingly.
The first factor is unipolar and represented by the following scales: significance of social environment.87, changes in mood.58. The analysis of the scales which formed the first factor gives the opportunity to interpret it as "Favorable conditions for existence". The second factor "Mobilization of mental state" is formed by the scale tension DOI

Discussion
The survey showed that both health self-esteem and subjective wellbeing serve as predictors not only of attitude towards the world and the self but also as a certain "frame" through the prism of which the person perceives the world around.
According to the results of the study the forth group with female dominance proved to be the most well-situated, which contradicts the findings of other researchers (for example, Grossman & Wood, 1993;Brody & Hall, 1993) who claimed that social stereotypes compel women to express such emotions as sadness and fear, they are more concerned with their own and other people emotional states and more emotionally labile than men.
The study indicated significant differences with regard to the age of the testees.
The youngest group of the respondents (the average age of 34.8) with low health selfesteem appeared to be the most "ill-situated" one, while the group of the respondents with the average age of 43.2 proved to be most well-situated. The data obtained contradict a large number of research efforts on subjective wellbeing indicating Ushaped interrelations between the age and subjective wellbeing, where the minimal point falls within the age group of 45-49 (for instance, [17]).
Differences in income level, the number of children and social standing were not revealed.
The revealed typology of the respondents based on the degree of subjective wellbeing and health self-esteem pronouncement provided the significant result of the study.
The typology obtained disclosed principal differences in the world picture characteristic of the subjects, namely: 1. Emotional instability, neuroticism and significance of social environment were revealed in the group of the respondents with low health self-esteem. The presence of situational anxiety, accompanied with fears, difficulty in concentrating, and hypochondriac inclusions can be assumed.

Conclusions
As a rule, ways leading to the feeling of balance, health and subjective wellbeing are intricate and purely individual, and their search can construct the core of personal wellbeing, i.e. helps gain mental health.
The search for individual and typological specific features depending on subjective perceptions of the person about health and wellbeing allows for revealing peculiar "syndromes" of individual consciousness. DOI  The theory of wellbeing and mental health can help the society go beyond the limits of political creed and adopt a psychological approach which makes people happier.