{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021937842778793418, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003656307129798903, 'mean_word_length': 5.936708860759493, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison of two schemes for the convective transport of chemical species in a Lagrangian global chemistry model

We have developed a detailed parametrization scheme to represent the effects of subgrid‐scale convective transport in a three‐dimensional chemistry‐transport model (CTM). The CTM utilizes the meteorological fields generated by a general‐circulation model (GCM) to redistribute over 70 chemical species. The convective transport is implemented using the convective mass fluxes, entrainment rates and detrainment rates from the GCM.