{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026422764227642278, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008130081300813009, 'mean_word_length': 5.285106382978723, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Dialogues and heritages in the digital public sphere

This also holds true for the fields of heritage and museum studies and practice since the 1990s, as well as in the European policies concerned with intercultural dialogue, as outlined in this volume. Rodney Harrison (2012 ) similarly provides strong support for this sentiment when he argues for dialogicality to be seen as an inherent aspect of the conceptualisation of heritage. Through the lens of a ‘dialogical model’, he argues, heritage ‘is seen as emerging from the relationship between people, objects, places and practices’ (p. 4). In this context, the concepts of materiality , connectivity and dialogue are ‘central to understanding the role of heritage in contemporary societies’ (ibid.) and allow us to deal more productively with uncertainty, crisis and controversy through the adoption of ‘hybrid forums’ in decisionmaking. Given such promise attributed to dialogues and dialogicality, this volume is a timely and critical intervention which has examined and tested the potential of both. The case studies found in Chapters 3, 4 and 5 of this volume have provided insights into how the dialogical potential of heritage, and particularly ideas connected with European heritage as a common or shared assembly of values, expressions and materialities, is perceived, practised and mobilised within the context of digital culture. These experiences of ‘lived’ Dialogues and heritages in the digital public sphere