{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015384615384615385, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.168421052631579, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Mainline CAI, necessary but not oppressive

Two years ago the term "mainline instruction" was introduced as a referent to a carefully designed, total instructional system to replace complete courses with a far less labor-intensive mixture of men and machines. This mode was contrasted with the adjunctive use of the computer by faculty members who are happy to work within the system and merely want to use the computer to improve their instruction. The two NSF-sponsored conferences on Computers in the Undergraduate Curriculum have illustrated and stimulated the adjunctive approach.