{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01903553299492386, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0025380710659898475, 'mean_word_length': 5.088803088803089, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Suitability of Asphalt Pavement Analyzer for Predicting Pavement Rutting

Findings are summarized from an investigation performed to evaluate the suitability of a wheel-tracking device known as the asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) for assessing the rutting potential of asphalt mixes. The evaluation process consisted of correlating the APA’s predicted rutting with known field measurements. The correlation between beam and gyratory samples and the testing variability were also investigated. In addition, the APA test results were compared with those obtained using the Georgia loaded-wheel tester. The findings of this investigation indicated that the APA may be an effective tool to rank asphalt mixtures in terms of their respective rut performance. However, for each mixture type, the APA testing variability was significant between tests and between the three testing locations within each test. Differences in rut measurements of up to 4.7 and 6.3 mm were recorded for beam and gyratory samples, respectively. Therefore, using the APA as a clear pass-or-fail criterion for performance prediction purposes of asphalt mixtures may not be appropriate at this time. It should be noted that these findings are based on data collected on three mixes. Therefore, it is suggested that the APA testing variability (testing and testing locations within the device) be further assessed with a wider range of mixtures. The intent of such an assessment should not only be to correlate the APA results with field data but also to develop potential pass-or-fail limits and procedures.