{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019308943089430895, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014227642276422764, 'mean_word_length': 4.564971751412429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Reviews : Spanish Studies

angle, as is the notion of the state as a family, which turned into a meritocracy and a system with an identifiable enemy in the 1940s. Chapter 7 is a very informative and rich chapter, exploring the withdrawal of Stalin from the public scene and his image as the father of the nation. Brooks also evaluates the manipulation of events in the newspapers with well-documented examples from the press and war memoirs. In Chapter 8 he analyses the post-war years in terms of a bad repetition of the 1930s narrative: Stalin features as the leader who has made the gift of victory. The Cold War and its biased coverage in the press form the subject of this chapter, extending also to the Korean War, the Doctor’s Plot and the cosmopolitan campaign, which is identified as the only press-driven campaign. In the epilogue Brooks defines Brezhnev’s conduct as a leader as parodic repetition of the 1930s style of leadership, continuing to perceive the periphery