{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01043338683788122, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.362244897959184, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The importance of the mutual learning system in the history of Russian education

Educational systems based solely on the information paradigm do not meet the requirements of modern society. The resolution of this contradiction in education lies in changing the educational paradigm: new pedagogical systems modeled on the basis of historical experience and rethinking the values of education become in demand. The article discusses the problem of the influence of social processes in the field of education on the formation of a value-oriented sphere of the younger generation using the example of the Lancaster system of mutual learning in Russia. The methodology of mutual learning through the prism of an axiological approach is substantiated. The features of the mutual learning methodology are revealed, which are considered by the author as a historical continuity in educational practice. The author characterizes the considered historical methodology of primary education, arguing the presence of its components such as the goals and objectives of training, content, tools and learning outcomes. The article emphasizes the importance of the mutual learning system for the development of the political and economic situation in the state.