{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012925969447708578, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.129496402877698, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The beginning of the end of principlism.

troversy is whether the questions engaged in this book profit from analysis in terms of gender differences. Every major thesis could be expressed without such appeals. However, Baier thinks gender differences re essential to a proper understanding of both past and present in moral philosophy. One of her most convincing themes is that moral philosophy has a male-dominated history so committed to the category of obligation that it lost sight of the concerns and traditional roles of women. Although many will judge Baier's fascinating appeals to gender expendable, even these readers may find her reflections on differences in perspective taken by male and female philosophers compelling and rewarding. Moreover, it is now beyond serious question that moral philosophy has been both enriched and revitalized