{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021611001964636542, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.986301369863014, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Adapting the DF-QuAD Algorithm to Bipolar Argumentation

We define a quantitative semantics for evaluating the strength of arguments in Bipolar Argumentation frameworks (BAFs) by adapting the DiscontinuityFree QuAD (DF-QuAD) algorithm previously used for evaluating the strength of arguments in Quantitative Argumentation Debates (QuAD) frameworks. We study the relationship between the new semantics and some existing semantics for other argumentation frameworks, as well as some properties of the semantics.