{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021683673469387755, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.430327868852459, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Robust scaling in fusion science: case study for the L-H power threshold

In regression analysis for deriving scaling laws in the context of fusion studies, standard regression methods are usually applied, of which ordinary least squares (OLS) is the most popular. However, concerns have been raised with respect to several assumptions underlying OLS in its application to fusion data. More sophisticated statistical techniques are available, but they are not widely used in the fusion community and, moreover, the predictions by scaling laws may vary significantly depending on the particular regression technique. Therefore we have developed a new regression method, which we call geodesic least squares regression (GLS), that is robust in the presence of significant uncertainty on both the data and the regression model. The method is based on probabilistic modeling of all variables involved in the scaling expression, using adequate probability distributions and a natural similarity measure between them (geodesic distance). In this work we revisit the scaling law for the power threshold for the L-to-H transition in tokamaks, using data from the multi-machine ITPA databases. Depending on model assumptions, OLS can yield different predictions of the power threshold for ITER. In contrast, GLS regression delivers consistent results. Consequently, given the ubiquity and importance of scaling laws and parametric dependence studies in fusion research, GLS regression is proposed as a robust and easily implemented alternative to classic regression techniques.