{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014298480786416443, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.871165644171779, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Legal support of individual entrepreneurship in the area of inspections by state authorities: practice and prospects

The article is devoted to the application of forestalling and mediation institutions in ensuring the rights of individual entrepreneurship in the area of inspections by state bodies. We presented a clarification of the definitions of "state control" and "inspection" terms by establishing the connection of universal and special principles of material and procedural origin, which are relevant for individual entrepreneurship due to the minimization of administrative risks. The efficiency of the forestalling institute as a tool of prevention and impact on individual entrepreneurs behavior is substantiated. In terms of ensuring the rights of individual entrepreneurship, the principle of evidence of the reasons for the preliminary inspections is proposed. The efficiency of the mediation institute to ensure the rights of individual entrepreneurship in the area of public law is given proof. Keywords—institute of prevention, the mediation institute, individual enterprise, state operational check