{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02181818181818182, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03636363636363636, 'mean_word_length': 5.054945054945055, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Postpartum and Postabortion Use of the TCu‐220C and Lippes Loop: A Comparative Study

The postinsertion experience of 274 women with the TCu‐220C and 522 women with the Lippes Loop in a university hospital family planning program in Bogotá, Colombia, has been studied by a life‐table method. Pregnancy and continuation rates are similar for both devices. Although the expulsion rate of the TCu‐220C is significantly lower than that of the Loop up to 12 months, higher removal rates for the TCu‐220C account for the similarity in overall continuation.