{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01615798922800718, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003590664272890485, 'mean_word_length': 5.488372093023256, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Towards the automatic analysis of 1H NMR spectra: Part 5. Confirmation of chemical structure with flow‐NMR

A shift comparison procedure, which allows the use of flow spectra in automatic structure confirmation, is described. The effect of imperfect proton scaling at the analysis stage, loss of solute resonances under large solvent signals and the intermittent detection of labile protons are considered. The derivation of a suitable threshold acceptance criterion in the absence of explicit knowledge of spectral prediction reliability is also discussed.