{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04215103763024197, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03102126926720055, 'mean_word_length': 4.553257621040048, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 8, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 11, 'https://': 3, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Size-Segregated Atmospheric Humic-Like Substances (HULIS) in Shanghai: Abundance, Seasonal Variation, and Source Identiﬁcation

: Humic-like substances (HULIS) are of great interest due to their optical and chemical characteristics. In this study, a total of 180 samples of atmospheric particulate matter (PM) of different sizes were collected from summer 2018 to spring 2019, in order to analyze the size distribution, to investigate the seasonal variation and then to identify the key sources of HULIS. The annual mean concentration of HULIS in the total suspended particulates reached 5.12 ± 1.42 µ g/m 3 . The HULIS concentration was extremely higher in winter (8.35 ± 2.06 µ g/m 3 ) than in autumn (4.88 ± 0.95 µ g/m 3 ), in summer (3.62 ± 1.68 µ g/m 3 ) and in spring (3.36 ± 0.99 µ g/m 3 ). The average annual ratio of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) to OC and the ratio of HULIS to WSOC reached 0.546 ± 0.092 and 0.56 ± 0.06, respectively. Throughout the whole year, the size distributions of WSOC and HULIS-C were relatively smooth. The peaks of WSOC appeared at 1.8~3.2 µ m and 0.56~1.0 µ m, while the peaks of HULIS-C were located at 3.2~5.6 µ m, 1.0~1.8 µ m and 0.18~0.32 µ m. The distribution of the HULIS particle mode was similar in spring, summer and autumn, while there was a lower proportion of the coarse mode and a higher proportion of the condensation mode in winter. By using the comprehensive analysis of principal component analysis (PCA), air mass backward trajectories (AMBTs) and ﬁre point maps, key sources of WSOC and HULIS in Shanghai were identiﬁed as biomass combustion (48.42%), coal combustion (17.49%), secondary formation (16.07%) and vehicle exhaust (5.37%). The remaining part might be contributed by crustal dust sources, marine sources and/or other possible sources. This study provides new insight into the characteristics and size distribution of HULIS in Shanghai, thereby providing a practical base for further modeling.


Introduction
Water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) in particulate matter (PM) accounts for approximately 10~80% of atmospheric organic carbon (OC) depending on the season, particle size, location, time of day and other factors [1][2][3]. WSOC can change the effective density, surface tension and hygroscopicity of aerosol particles and, in turn, affect the ability of particles to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) [4][5][6]. Humic-like substances (HULIS) are one of the most important classes of WSOC in atmospheric aerosols and are of great interest due to their light absorption, surface activity and photochemical activity [7,8]. These substances are uniformly named after their similar physical and chemical properties to terrestrial and aquatic humic substances [9]. of HULIS thus far, which restricts the knowledge about the key sources and formation mechanisms of HULIS in different sizes.
Here, size-segregated aerosol samples were collected during four whole weeks in four seasons from summer 2018 to spring 2019. The objectives of this study are (1) to clarify the size distribution of WSOC and HULIS to further analyze the formation mechanism; (2) to investigate the seasonal variation of OC, EC, WSOC and HULIS and its driving factors; (3) to confirm the key sources of carbonaceous aerosols in Shanghai. The results of the study may fill the gap in size distribution analysis of HULIS in Shanghai and deepen the understanding of the sources of carbonaceous aerosols.

Sampling
A total of 180 aerosol samples were collected on the rooftop of a 20 m-high building on the campus of Fudan University (N31 • 18 14", E121 • 25 31", 9 m a.s.l.). The sampling site is located in the northeastern part of downtown Shanghai surrounded by residential and commercial areas. The nearest high-load road (Handan Road) is about 260 m south from the site, and Shanghai Railway Station is around 7 km southwest. In addition, there are also several characteristic emission point sources around the sampling site. The Baoshan Industrial Zone is located about 20 km north from the site, while an oil-fired thermal power plant, Zhabei power plant, is located 7 km away from the site in the northeast direction. Moreover, the Jiangqiao incineration facility is located about 20 km away from the site in the west direction, while another facility, Yuqiao, is located 16 km south from the site, both of which process more than 1000 tons of garbage. Thus, a variety of emission sources can affect the sampling site, and simultaneously, no one specific emission source can dominate the site, which makes Fudan University a typical urban site. The map of the sampling site is shown in Figure S1. The detailed sampling information in this study including date and meteorological parameters is shown in Table S1 (Source: https://weather.cma.cn/, accessed on 24 June 2020).
The size-segregated aerosol particles were collected on 47 mm quartz filters (PALLFLEX, USA) with a micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI. MSP Corp., USA; Model 110-R). The flow rate of the sampling process was 30 L min −1 . The cascade impactor divided the aerosol particles into 10 different stages by diameters, including >18 µm (stage 1), 10~18 µm (stage 2), 5.6~10 µm (stage 3), 3.2~5.6 µm (stage 4), 1.8~3.2 µm (stage 5), 1.0~1.8 µm (stage 6), 0.56~1.0 µm (stage 7), 0.32~0.56 µm (stage 8), 0.18~0.32 µm (stage 9) and 0.10~0.18 µm (stage 10). The ultrafine mode and Aitken mode should correspond to the particles of stages 11 and 12 of the MOUDI impactor, but the mass concentrations of them in this research were much lower than those in the first ten stages. Similar results also appeared in the studies of Xiu et al. in Zhao et al. in 2011. The reason could be that unstable ultrafine-mode PM was likely to be deposited or condensed into larger particles through Brownian motion, or its mass concentration was indeed much lower than that of the other modes.
Each season was represented in this study by a whole selected week with 4 to 5 sets of size-segregated samples. To remove water and other volatile components, the quartz fiber filters were pre-fired at 500 • C for 4 h in a muffle furnace. Before and after each sampling, the filters were weighed by an intelligent weighing system after at least 24 h of equilibration at 20 • C and 40% relative humidity (RH). Both sampled and blank filters were packed into membrane filter boxes and stored under −20 • C prior to analysis.

Chemical Analysis
Each sample was analyzed for 4 kinds of carbonaceous components (OC, EC, WSOC and HULIS), water-soluble nitrogen (WSN) and water-soluble inorganic ions (Na + , NH 4 + , K + , Ca + , F − , Cl − . NO 3 − and SO 4 2− , WSIIs). Half of each filter was cut off and extracted in a 50 mL screw-cap vial. An amount of 20 mL ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm) was added to the vial. All the samples were then extracted in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min, during which time the vial was controlled at the same temperature. The extracts were filtrated by 0.45 µm polycarbonate membrane and then were divided into two parts for WSOC and HULIS-C analysis each. The part for WSOC was directly analyzed by a total organic carbon (TOC) analyzer (TOC-L CPH, Shimadzu, Japan). This measurement also obtained the water-soluble nitrogen (WSN) concentration for auxiliary use in subsequent source identification.
The isolation of HULIS was based on a widely recognized method using the HLB solid phase extraction cartridge (Oasis HLB, Waters, USA) [9]. The extract for HULIS was acidified to a pH of 2 and then loaded on a cartridge preconditioned with 3 mL methanol and 3 mL ultrapure water in turn. Most of the HULIS were then eluted with 2 mL methanol with 2% ammonia. HULIS were evaporated to dryness under a gentle stream of nitrogen with a flow rate lower than 1 mL min −1 , redissolved into 10 mL ultrapure water and finally analyzed by the TOC analyzer. In order to determine the effectiveness of this method for HULIS, pioneering experiments were conducted with SRFA (Suwannee River Fulvic Acid) [9,28], the standard substance of HULIS, and obtained a mass loss rate of 4 ± 5%, indicating the high efficiency of this method [24]. In order to omit procedure blanks, several unsampled membrane filters also underwent pre-firing, constant temperature and humidity balance, ultrasonic extraction, solid-phase microextraction and other steps and finally entered TOC analysis to obtain WSOC and HULIS concentrations. The concentrations obtained by this operation were used as the blank control in this experiment, and it was performed once in each group of the TOC analysis.
The above method is used to measure the mass of organic carbon in HULIS. The measured value could be multiplied by a conversion factor to obtain the mass of HULIS. This conversion factor ranges widely due to different conditions such as the separation method and the sampling location. Generally, the value is between 1.8 and 2.3, around 1.81 in urban areas and around 1.93 in suburban areas [5,29,30]. For the convenience of comparing HULIS with other carbonaceous substances (OC, EC and WSOC) in this study, the concentration of HULIS-Carbon was used for analysis.
To measure the concentration of WSIIs, a quarter of each membrane filter was cut into small pieces and sonicated in 10 mL ultrapure water for 30 min. An ion chromatography system (940 Professional IC, Metrohm, Switzerland) was used to determine the concentration of Na + , NH 4 + , K + , Ca + , F − , Cl − . NO 3 − and SO 4 2− , which was equipped with a separation column, Metrosep A supp 5-250, and a guard column, Metrosep A supp 5 S, for anions, and an analytical column, Metrosep C 6-150, and a guard column, Metrosep C 6, for cations. The relative standard deviation of all kinds of ions was lower than 4% according to the reproducibility test.

OC and EC Measurement
OC and EC in the samples were determined by a semi-continuous OC/EC field analyzer (Model-4, Sunset Lab, Tigard, OR, USA) using the thermal-optical method. A part of the membrane filter with a radius of 8 mm was cut off and fixed in the quartz tube channel of the instrument. The carbonaceous aerosol on the membrane filter gradually released carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) during the heating process, and the concentration signal of CO 2 was captured by the non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) sensor in the instrument. At the end of each analysis, methane gas (5.0%, ultra-high purity, He balance) was injected as an internal standard. After subtracting the determined baseline, the raw NDIR signal of each step was integrated and converted into carbon mass and normalized as the response value of methane to subtract the slight difference in the gas flow rate. Thus, the total carbon (TC) of the thermo-optical analysis was obtained. In addition, an optical EC signal was also measured by this instrument, which was not sensitive to any interference in thermo-optical analysis due to different pathways [31]. After that, the optical OC was Atmosphere 2021, 12, 526 5 of 18 defined as the difference between the thermo-optical TC and the optical EC to obtain the final concentration as OC and EC [32].

Source Apportionment: Principal Component Analysis
Principal component analysis (PCA) is a widely used method for data reduction, which is dedicated to finding a linear combination of original variables (principal components, PCs). These combinations should occupy as much of the original total variance as possible. This contribution rate also represents the contribution of each combination to the main data space. In the field of atmospheric sciences, PCA is often used for source identification, apportionment and analysis [33][34][35][36]. In this study, the concentration of different substances in each sample was substituted into the PCA calculation, and 4 PCs orthogonal to each other were obtained, which could imply different sources of atmospheric PM. A software in the Python environment called Jupyter Notebook was used to perform PCA calculations in this study, which were calculated on all the existing 180 samples containing 13 dimensions, revealing the four possible key sources of aerosol particles in Shanghai, and determining the practical significance of these four sources through the contribution rates of different substances to the sources.

Air Mass Back Trajectories and Fire Count Maps
The 72-h air mass back trajectories arriving at the sampling site at the height of 29 m, 500 m, 1500 m and 3000 m were computed with the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectories (HYSPLIT) model, based on the data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) FNL database [37]. This method has been going through a 30-year-long evolution to handle sophisticated computations of transport, mixing, chemical transformation and deposition of pollutants and hazardous materials and has become part of the READY system (Real-time Environmental Applications and Display System), which provided a shortcut to generate air mass trajectories and display meteorological data [37,38]. This method is now widely used in many fields of research, including radionuclides, wildfire smoke and volcanic ash. Additionally, the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART designed for calculating the pathway of air pollutants from point sources has evolved into a tool for analyzing the transport of air masses [39]. A creative approach using the forward mode and the backward mode of FLEXPART in turn was introduced in 2014 in order to shorten the simulation time of other trajectory statistical methods and identify the ghost sources [40].
A fire count map was drawn with active fire events during the sampling period obtained from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer observations on NASA satellites (Source: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/, accessed on 12 June 2020).

Seasonal Variations of Carbonaceous Species in the Total Suspended Particulates (TSP)
The seasonal variations of atmospheric carbonaceous species are summarized in Figure 1. Mass concentrations of OC, EC, WSOC, HULIS and their ratios of this study and several previous studies are shown in Table 1. The average concentrations of OC, EC, WSOC and HULIS-C through the whole year were 16.83 ± 3.72, 3.03 ± 0.90, 9.00 ± 1.91 and 5.12 ± 1.42 µg/m 3 , respectively. Previous studies on HULIS in Shanghai reached 2.69 ± 1.36 µg/m 3 in PM 2.5 samples and 2.20 ± 1.17 µg/m 3 in PM 1 samples [27,41]. The peaks of OC, WSOC and HULIS-C appeared in winter, which was in good agreement with the results of pioneering studies [15,27]. In winter, the mass concentrations of the three species were significantly higher than those in the other seasons, partly due to the increase in the indoor heating level and the prolonging of vehicle cold start time under conditions of low temperature [42,43]. EC showed the highest concentration in autumn, while the lowest one occurred in winter. Previous studies commonly found that the EC concentration suffered the higher values in autumn and winter [15,44]. The different results in our study might be attributed to the abnormal high precipitation  [45] had 24 sunny days. Additionally, the Shanghai Meteorological Department reported that the number of rainy days in Shanghai in the winter of 2018 reached the second highest level in the same period in history. The EC particles might have been washed and settled by rainwater, meaning that they were difficult to be collected. In addition, one study in Beijing found that EC shared a lower proportion of the aerosol mass when the relative humidity was higher [46]. Thus, this result is representative for the winter of 2018, and the abnormal fluctuations were possibly due to the long rainy time and high precipitation in this year.
Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 19 occurred in winter. Previous studies commonly found that the EC concentration suffered the higher values in autumn and winter [15,44].  [45] had 24 sunny days. Additionally, the Shanghai Meteorological Department reported that the number of rainy days in Shanghai in the winter of 2018 reached the second highest level in the same period in history. The EC particles might have been washed and settled by rainwater, meaning that they were difficult to be collected. In addition, one study in Beijing found that EC shared a lower proportion of the aerosol mass when the relative humidity was higher [46]. Thus, this result is representative for the winter of 2018, and the abnormal fluctuations were possibly due to the long rainy time and high precipitation in this year. The mass ratio of OC to EC is mainly affected by primary direct emissions and the formation of secondary organic aerosols (SOA). This ratio could imply the source of aerosols, thereby distinguishing different combustion sources such as gasoline, diesel, coal and biomass [47,48]. The ratios in summer, autumn, winter and spring were 5.97 ± 0.71, 3.17 ± 0.24, 16.22 ± 4.69 and 4.31 ± 1.30, respectively (Figure 2a), which could roughly indicate that coal combustion and vehicle exhaust might be some of the main primary sources of atmospheric PM in Shanghai during the spring, summer and autumn, while biomass combustion might be one of the main primary sources in winter [49]. The mass ratio of OC to EC is mainly affected by primary direct emissions and the formation of secondary organic aerosols (SOA). This ratio could imply the source of aerosols, thereby distinguishing different combustion sources such as gasoline, diesel, coal and biomass [47,48]. The ratios in summer, autumn, winter and spring were 5.97 ± 0.71, 3.17 ± 0.24, 16.22 ± 4.69 and 4.31 ± 1.30, respectively (Figure 2a), which could roughly indicate that coal combustion and vehicle exhaust might be some of the main primary sources of atmospheric PM in Shanghai during the spring, summer and autumn, while biomass combustion might be one of the main primary sources in winter [49].  The proportions of HULIS-C in OC and WSOC are essential indicators of characterizing the seasonal variation of the source and composition of HULIS-C and other carbonaceous aerosols. The ratios of WSOC/OC, HULIS-C/WSOC and HULIS-C/OC in the four seasons were maintained at relatively stable values, and these values throughout the whole year ranged from 45.4% to 63.8%, from 50.1% to 61.3% and from 23.5% to 37.5%, respectively (Figure 2b-d). The seasonal ratios of HULIS-C/WSOC were 49.6% ± 1.5%, 52.6% ± 3.2%, 62.9% ± 10.4% and 57.8% ± 7.2% in summer, autumn, winter and spring, respectively. Zhao et al. [15] found that the ratios in summer, autumn, winter and spring of Shanghai were 59.52% ± 11.60%, 64.69% ± 9.11%, 67.32% ± 10.77% and 60.26% ± 14.61% in PM2.5. Similar to our study, the maximum of this ratio in this study also appeared in winter, and the minimum appeared in summer; however, the ratios of the four seasons in this study were all lower than those obtained by Zhao et al. This might indicate that in the particles larger than 2.5 μm, the proportions of HULIS-C in WSOC and OC were lower than those of PM2.5. Furthermore, the samples in winter showed the lowest WSOC/OC ratio and the highest HULIS-C/WSOC ratio, while the samples in autumn suffered from the highest WSOC/OC ratio, indicating that the concentration of waterinsoluble organic carbon (WIOC) also varied seasonally due to different sources, which was lower in autumn and higher in winter.

Abundances and Seasonal Variations of Carbonaceous Species in Different Size Fractions
The size-segregated concentrations of the carbonaceous aerosols are presented in Figure 3. From the distribution of the same particle size of the same substance ( Figure S2), the lower half of the concentration distribution was generally concentrated. The annual particle size distribution selected the median for comparison, in order to reduce the interference caused by large outliers to make it more representative of the overall level throughout the year. Due to the wide size range of PM>18, the concentrations of this stage were not The proportions of HULIS-C in OC and WSOC are essential indicators of characterizing the seasonal variation of the source and composition of HULIS-C and other carbonaceous aerosols. The ratios of WSOC/OC, HULIS-C/WSOC and HULIS-C/OC in the four seasons were maintained at relatively stable values, and these values throughout the whole year ranged from 45.4% to 63.8%, from 50.1% to 61.3% and from 23.5% to 37.5%, respectively (Figure 2b-d). The seasonal ratios of HULIS-C/WSOC were 49.6% ± 1.5%, 52.6% ± 3.2%, 62.9% ± 10.4% and 57.8% ± 7.2% in summer, autumn, winter and spring, respectively. Zhao et al. [15] found that the ratios in summer, autumn, winter and spring of Shanghai were 59.52% ± 11.60%, 64.69% ± 9.11%, 67.32% ± 10.77% and 60.26% ± 14.61% in PM 2.5 . Similar to our study, the maximum of this ratio in this study also appeared in winter, and the minimum appeared in summer; however, the ratios of the four seasons in this study were all lower than those obtained by Zhao et al. This might indicate that in the particles larger than 2.5 µm, the proportions of HULIS-C in WSOC and OC were lower than those of PM 2.5 . Furthermore, the samples in winter showed the lowest WSOC/OC ratio and the highest HULIS-C/WSOC ratio, while the samples in autumn suffered from the highest WSOC/OC ratio, indicating that the concentration of water-insoluble organic carbon (WIOC) also varied seasonally due to different sources, which was lower in autumn and higher in winter.

Abundances and Seasonal Variations of Carbonaceous Species in Different Size Fractions
The size-segregated concentrations of the carbonaceous aerosols are presented in Figure 3. From the distribution of the same particle size of the same substance ( Figure S2), the lower half of the concentration distribution was generally concentrated. The annual particle size distribution selected the median for comparison, in order to reduce the interference caused by large outliers to make it more representative of the overall level throughout the year. Due to the wide size range of PM >18 , the concentrations of this stage were not considered when discussing the peak position. These concentrations were only included as a completion for coarse-mode PM.
Atmosphere 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 19 considered when discussing the peak position. These concentrations were only included as a completion for coarse-mode PM. From the perspective of the particle size distribution, EC showed a bimodal distribution with two peaks at 0.32~0.56 μm and 3.2~5.6 μm. Meanwhile, OC had a single peak at 0.56~1.0 μm. Ding et al. [50] found that in Shanghai from 2015 to 2016, both OC and EC had major peaks at 0.56~1.0 μm and 5.6~10 μm, while minor peaks at 0.056~0.10 μm, 0.18~0.32 μm and 1.8~3.2 μm. The particle size distribution of OC in this study was similar to our study, while the deviation of EC was larger. This might be related to the lower EC concentration in the winter of 2018 mentioned above compared with other years.
In order to further analyze the size distribution of WSOC and HULIS-C in different seasons, the mean concentrations of WSOC and HULIS-C in each particle size range of the seasonal samples are shown in Figure 4. The size distribution of mean concentrations of OC and EC in different seasons is shown in Figure S3. Overall, the trends of WSOC and HULIS-C concentrations with particle sizes were basically consistent, especially in spring and summer. It could be observed that both WSOC and HULIS-C concentrations in the spring samples reached a peak at >18 μm. This might lead to dominating primary sources in spring. Minor peaks were found at 0.32~0.56 μm and 1.0~3.2 μm. The summer samples showed a bimodal distribution, reaching peaks at 0.32~1.0 μm and 5.6~10 μm, respectively. In the autumn samples, the concentration of HULIS-C was relatively stable with the change in particle size, and the concentration of WSOC was higher where the particle size was larger, which might be associated with active agricultural production [51]. In winter, the highest concentration of HULIS-C and WSOC mainly focused on the fine From the perspective of the particle size distribution, EC showed a bimodal distribution with two peaks at 0.32~0.56 µm and 3.2~5.6 µm. Meanwhile, OC had a single peak at 0.56~1.0 µm. Ding et al. [50] found that in Shanghai from 2015 to 2016, both OC and EC had major peaks at 0.56~1.0 µm and 5.6~10 µm, while minor peaks at 0.056~0.10 µm, 0.18~0.32 µm and 1.8~3.2 µm. The particle size distribution of OC in this study was similar to our study, while the deviation of EC was larger. This might be related to the lower EC concentration in the winter of 2018 mentioned above compared with other years.
In order to further analyze the size distribution of WSOC and HULIS-C in different seasons, the mean concentrations of WSOC and HULIS-C in each particle size range of the seasonal samples are shown in Figure 4. The size distribution of mean concentrations of OC and EC in different seasons is shown in Figure S3. Overall, the trends of WSOC and HULIS-C concentrations with particle sizes were basically consistent, especially in spring and summer. It could be observed that both WSOC and HULIS-C concentrations in the spring samples reached a peak at >18 µm. This might lead to dominating primary sources in spring. Minor peaks were found at 0.32~0.56 µm and 1.0~3.2 µm. The summer samples showed a bimodal distribution, reaching peaks at 0.32~1.0 µm and 5.6~10 µm, respectively. In the autumn samples, the concentration of HULIS-C was relatively stable with the change in particle size, and the concentration of WSOC was higher where the particle size was larger, which might be associated with active agricultural production [51]. In winter, the highest concentration of HULIS-C and WSOC mainly focused on the fine particles, indicating that anthropogenic emissions might be the most important source of PM in winter [52]. Compared with the 2018 study in Slovenia of Frka et al. [25], both HULIS-C and WSOC in our study displayed more obvious seasonal variations in the size distribution. The reason might be that the particles in Shanghai shared more diverse sources [15,53]. particles, indicating that anthropogenic emissions might be the most important source of PM in winter [52]. Compared with the 2018 study in Slovenia of Frka et al. [25], both HULIS-C and WSOC in our study displayed more obvious seasonal variations in the size distribution. The reason might be that the particles in Shanghai shared more diverse sources [15,53]. Due to the limitation of the particle size segregation of the sampler, the concentrations of >1.8 μm, 0.56~1.8 μm and 0.10~0.56 μm in each set of samples were defined in the study as the coarse mode, the droplet mode and the condensation mode of PM in the atmosphere, respectively. Studies have shown that HULIS-C accounts for a relatively low proportion of ultrafine particles in autumn and winter, which is about 3% and 7% of particles < 15.6 μm [25]. The higher proportion in spring (16%) and summer (27%) might indicate that the formation of new particles containing HULIS-C was more obvious in spring and summer and points to a stronger photo-oxidation process.
As shown in Figure 5, the proportions of the condensation mode, droplet mode and coarse mode in spring, summer and autumn were similar, while the proportions of the three modes in winter largely deviated from the average of the other three seasons, with a higher proportion of the condensation mode and a lower proportion of the coarse mode. This phenomenon showed that the sources of PM loaded with WSOC and HULIS-C in the atmosphere of Shanghai were quite different from those of the other three seasons. In addition, the modal distribution in winter also indicated that the process of the formation and growth of atmospheric PM in winter was also significantly different from the other three seasons. In winter, the generation rate of fine particles in the Shanghai atmosphere might be greater than the rate of further growth and eventually led to the enrichment of PM in the fine particle mode. The results of Guangzhou, China, and Ljubljana, Slovenia, both showed that the condensation mode occupied the largest proportion of HULIS-C [24,25]. However, the coarse particle mode was treated as the most dominant form of WSOC and HULIS-C obtained in this study, which might be due to the wider range of the coarse-mode PM in this study, that is, PM>18 was also included in the research category. Due to the limitation of the particle size segregation of the sampler, the concentrations of >1.8 µm, 0.56~1.8 µm and 0.10~0.56 µm in each set of samples were defined in the study as the coarse mode, the droplet mode and the condensation mode of PM in the atmosphere, respectively. Studies have shown that HULIS-C accounts for a relatively low proportion of ultrafine particles in autumn and winter, which is about 3% and 7% of particles < 15.6 µm [25]. The higher proportion in spring (16%) and summer (27%) might indicate that the formation of new particles containing HULIS-C was more obvious in spring and summer and points to a stronger photo-oxidation process.
As shown in Figure 5, the proportions of the condensation mode, droplet mode and coarse mode in spring, summer and autumn were similar, while the proportions of the three modes in winter largely deviated from the average of the other three seasons, with a higher proportion of the condensation mode and a lower proportion of the coarse mode. This phenomenon showed that the sources of PM loaded with WSOC and HULIS-C in the atmosphere of Shanghai were quite different from those of the other three seasons. In addition, the modal distribution in winter also indicated that the process of the formation and growth of atmospheric PM in winter was also significantly different from the other three seasons. In winter, the generation rate of fine particles in the Shanghai atmosphere might be greater than the rate of further growth and eventually led to the enrichment of PM in the fine particle mode. The results of Guangzhou, China, and Ljubljana, Slovenia, both showed that the condensation mode occupied the largest proportion of HULIS-C [24,25]. However, the coarse particle mode was treated as the most dominant form of WSOC and HULIS-C obtained in this study, which might be due to the wider range of the coarse-mode PM in this study, that is, PM >18 was also included in the research category.

Correlation between OC, EC, WSOC and HULIS
Correlation analysis of the WSOC, HULIS-C and OC concentrations in all of the samples showed that each pair of these species was moderately relevant, which indicated that WSOC, HULIS and OC might be derived from similar sources (R 2 = 0.71, p < 0.01; R 2 = 0.30, p < 0.01; R 2 = 0.35, p < 0.01; Figure  6a, b and d). In contrast, there was no correlation between HULIS-C and EC (R 2 = 0, p = 0.93; Figure 6c), as well as WSOC and EC (R 2 = 0.02, p = 0.07; Figure  6e). EC is generally considered as a typical combustion source fingerprint [54], and thus the above result might indicate that both WSOC and HULIS-C in Shanghai were mainly formed from secondary chemical reactions rather than direct emissions.
Most of the SOA are formed by oxidizing substances or groups, and these substances tend to show strong polarity and thus have better water solubility. Therefore, the concentration of WSOC is widely used as an indicator of SOA formation [55][56][57]. Due to the significant correlation between HULIS-C and WSOC, it is reasonable to infer that HULIS was also related to the formation of SOA. Previous studies examined that HULIS-C possessed a moderate correlation with several kinds of anthropogenic SOA tracers, such as β-caryophyllinic acid and 2-methyltetrols [54], which provided significant evidence for the correlation between HULIS and SOA formation.

Correlation between OC, EC, WSOC and HULIS
Correlation analysis of the WSOC, HULIS-C and OC concentrations in all of the samples showed that each pair of these species was moderately relevant, which indicated that WSOC, HULIS and OC might be derived from similar sources (R 2 = 0.71, p < 0.01; R 2 = 0.30, p < 0.01; R 2 = 0.35, p < 0.01; Figure 6a,b,d). In contrast, there was no correlation between HULIS-C and EC (R 2 = 0, p = 0.93; Figure 6c), as well as WSOC and EC (R 2 = 0.02, p = 0.07; Figure 6e). EC is generally considered as a typical combustion source fingerprint [54], and thus the above result might indicate that both WSOC and HULIS-C in Shanghai were mainly formed from secondary chemical reactions rather than direct emissions.  Table 2 shows the correlation between the five pairs of substances in the coarse and fine modes. Stage 1 to stage 5 (0.1~1.8 μm) and stage 6 to stage 10 (>1.8 μm) were defined as the coarse-mode PM and fine-mode PM, respectively. Different modes showed the same result that WSOC and HULIS-C had Most of the SOA are formed by oxidizing substances or groups, and these substances tend to show strong polarity and thus have better water solubility. Therefore, the concentration of WSOC is widely used as an indicator of SOA formation [55][56][57]. Due to the significant correlation between HULIS-C and WSOC, it is reasonable to infer that HULIS was also related to the formation of SOA. Previous studies examined that HULIS-C possessed a moderate correlation with several kinds of anthropogenic SOA tracers, such as β-caryophyllinic acid and 2-methyltetrols [54], which provided significant evidence for the correlation between HULIS and SOA formation. Table 2 shows the correlation between the five pairs of substances in the coarse and fine modes. Stage 1 to stage 5 (0.1~1.8 µm) and stage 6 to stage 10 (>1.8 µm) were defined as the coarse-mode PM and fine-mode PM, respectively. Different modes showed the same result that WSOC and HULIS-C had basically no correlation with EC. Meanwhile, pairwise correlations among WSOC, HULIS-C and OC were significant, and the correlations between them of fine-mode PM were stronger than those of coarse-mode PM. Thus, the fine-mode PM of HULIS-C might be mainly from secondary formation, while the coarse-mode PM of HULIS-C was more complicatedly affected by primary emissions and secondary formation simultaneously. Different kinds of primary emission sources such as marine and dust may provide large particles of carbonaceous aerosols [58,59]. Therefore, it was supposed that these two sources might be important potential sources of carbonaceous aerosols in Shanghai. As a supplement, Frka et al. [25] believed that the contribution of ultrafine-mode HULIS-C was most likely the result of new particle formation processes during higher biogenic volatile organic compound (BVOC) emissions based on their observations from 2014 to 2015. Table 2. Correlation analysis of different types of carbonaceous aerosols in coarse particles, fine particles and TSP. In summary, the analysis led to the conclusion that the coarse-mode PM of HULIS-C in Shanghai was derived from both primary emissions and secondary formation, and the fine-mode PM mainly came from secondary formation, while the ultrafine particles might be most related to the formation of new particles.

Principal Component Analysis: Source Apportionment and Identification
A Python program was run in Jupyter Notebook to perform PCA analysis based on the dataset containing 13 dimensions (the concentrations of 8 types of ions, 4 types of carbonaceous aerosol species and WSN) and 180 samples. In the final results, the fifth largest proportion of variance of the principal component was significantly smaller than that of the other four principal components. Therefore, four PCs were determined, and their proportions of variance were 48.42%, 17.49%, 16.07% and 5.37% (Figure 7a). The sum of the variances of the four principal components was 87.35%, which means that in the overall data space, the amount of information not described by these four principal components was about 12.65% of the total information. The contribution rate of each dimension to each principal component is depicted in Figure 7b. The sum of the squares of all contribution rates to the same PC is 1. ance were 48.42%, 17.49%, 16.07% and 5.37% (Figure 7a). The sum of the variances of the four principal components was 87.35%, which means that in the overall data space, the amount of information not described by these four principal components was about 12.65% of the total information. The contribution rate of each dimension to each principal component is depicted in Figure 7b. The sum of the squares of all contribution rates to the same PC is 1. PC 1 was characterized by the higher loadings of potassium ion and OC, which explained 46.2% and 73.3% of the concentrations, respectively. Traditionally, potassium ion was considered to originate from biomass burning along with a minor contribution of fugitive dust [15,60], and the higher OC/EC ratio also reflected the contribution of biomass burning [47,48]. The predominant inorganic ion found in PC 2 was sulfate ion (80.4%). In previous studies, sulfate ion was associated with coal combustion [45]. The most abundant species found in PC 3 were ammonium ion (70.7%) and WSOC (46.8%). In addition, water-soluble nitrogen was found most reflected in PC 3 (29.3%). These substances were typical SOA products [55][56][57]61,62]. In PC 4, the highest loading of nitrate ion (61.7%) is typically emitted from vehicle exhaust [63]. Sodium ion (26.9%) and chloride ion (28.6%) also shared relatively higher loadings in PC 4. Nevertheless, the ratio of Na + /Cl − (94.0%) was markedly higher than that in seawater (56.0%) [64]. Therefore, PC 4 was more likely to be attributed to the contribution of vehicle exhaust instead of marine sources.
These key sources contributed 87.35% of the information to the total data. Other possible sources of atmospheric aerosols in YRD included agricultural sources, crustal sources, marine sources, industrial emissions and other sources [16,17]. PC 1 was characterized by the higher loadings of potassium ion and OC, which explained 46.2% and 73.3% of the concentrations, respectively. Traditionally, potassium ion was considered to originate from biomass burning along with a minor contribution of fugitive dust [15,60], and the higher OC/EC ratio also reflected the contribution of biomass burning [47,48]. The predominant inorganic ion found in PC 2 was sulfate ion (80.4%). In previous studies, sulfate ion was associated with coal combustion [45]. The most abundant species found in PC 3 were ammonium ion (70.7%) and WSOC (46.8%). In addition, water-soluble nitrogen was found most reflected in PC 3 (29.3%). These substances were typical SOA products [55][56][57]61,62]. In PC 4, the highest loading of nitrate ion (61.7%) is typically emitted from vehicle exhaust [63]. Sodium ion (26.9%) and chloride ion (28.6%) also shared relatively higher loadings in PC 4. Nevertheless, the ratio of Na + /Cl − (94.0%) was markedly higher than that in seawater (56.0%) [64]. Therefore, PC 4 was more likely to be attributed to the contribution of vehicle exhaust instead of marine sources.

Investigation of Potential Source Regions of WSOC and HULIS by Air Mass Back Trajectories and Fire Count Maps
In summary, PCA analysis provided four key sources of size-segregated samples in Shanghai, which were biomass combustion (48.42%), coal combustion (17.49%), secondary formation (16.07%) and vehicle exhaust (5.37%). These key sources contributed 87.35% of the information to the total data. Other possible sources of atmospheric aerosols in YRD included agricultural sources, crustal sources, marine sources, industrial emissions and other sources [16,17] Figure  S4. The height of the boundary layer calculated by the NOAA HYSPLIT model reached about 1200 m, so the nearest AMBTs of 1500 m were chosen as the main ones to be discussed. The lower air masses might suffer from the influence of the underlying surface too much, while the aerosol particles carried in the higher air mass could be difficult to settle at the sampling point. The meteorological dataset used in trajectory calculation was NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis (1948-present) (Source: ftp://arlftp.arlhq.noaa.gov/pub/ archives/reanalysis, accessed on 12 June 2020). The AMBTs and fire points in the same season are marked with the same color.
In summer, the air masses originated from YRD and the North China Plain (NCP), both of which are densely populated and highly industrialized regions. The concentrations of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in the atmosphere of the NCP were about twice those of YRD [65], indicating that the NCP might be an important source region of PM in the air masses. The fire spots in the pathway of the air masses were dense, which might imply that the particles from combustion carried by the air masses had a greater contribution to the atmospheric PM in Shanghai. 2020). The AMBTs and fire points in the same season are marked with the same color.
In summer, the air masses originated from YRD and the North China Plain (NCP), both of which are densely populated and highly industrialized regions. The concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 in the atmosphere of the NCP were about twice those of YRD [65], indicating that the NCP might be an important source region of PM in the air masses. The fire spots in the pathway of the air masses were dense, which might imply that the particles from combustion carried by the air masses had a greater contribution to the atmospheric PM in Shanghai. In autumn, the northwest of China was the most active source region of the air masses, which passed by a moderate number of fire points. The population in this area is concentrated in a few large cities, and many regions are surrounded by the desert. In the cities in this region, the main sources of carbonaceous aerosols were coal combustion and vehicle exhaust [66], while the aerosol loading in the desert exhibited dust sources besides those above [58]. In autumn, the northwest of China was the most active source region of the air masses, which passed by a moderate number of fire points. The population in this area is concentrated in a few large cities, and many regions are surrounded by the desert. In the cities in this region, the main sources of carbonaceous aerosols were coal combustion and vehicle exhaust [66], while the aerosol loading in the desert exhibited dust sources besides those above [58]. Thus, the dust transported by air masses might be an unresolved source of atmospheric PM in Shanghai in autumn.
In winter, the air masses went through a long transmission pathway, which could be traced back to the central and western regions of China, and Central Asia. This area is close to the high-altitude areas of China, with relatively more mountainous regions. In pioneering studies of Nam Co with less human activities, and Lhasa, a typical city in this area, lower concentrations of HULIS and WSOC were sampled [54,67]. In addition, there were fewer fire spots in the winter air mass pathway and the adjacent YRD area. Hence, this result might indicate that atmospheric aerosols in winter in Shanghai were more affected by secondary formation rather than open flames nearby.
In spring, the air masses specifically originated from the East China Sea. Generally, most marine aerosols are relatively clean and mainly composed of sea salt aerosols [59]. Sea salt aerosols are usually enriched in the coarse mode, which is consistent with the higher coarse mode peaks in the particle size distribution of spring PM (Figure 4). To further confirm this speculation, the concentration of organic matter such as dimethyl sulfide is also an important criterion for identifying marine aerosols [68]. However, in this experiment, due to the size-segregated sampling measurement, the concentrations of trace organic matters are low and difficult to obtain. It could be considered that undetermined marine source aerosols have a certain contribution to the atmospheric PM in Shanghai in spring, and the specific contribution rate and other information need to be further measured in future studies.

Conclusions
Based on this study, the seasonal variations and size distributions of WSOC and HULIS and identification and apportionment of their sources in Shanghai were examined. The concentrations of OC, WSOC and HULIS-C in TSP were the highest in winter, followed by autumn, summer and spring. EC peaked in autumn, and EC in spring was the second highest, while winter and summer suffered from lower EC concentrations. Size distribution analysis showed that the size distributions of WSOC and HULIS-C were relatively smooth. The peaks of WSOC appeared at 1.8~3.2 µm and 0.56~1.0 µm, while the peaks of HULIS-C were located at 3.2~5.6 µm, 1.0~1.8 µm and 0.18~0.32 µm. In the mode analysis of particles in the four seasons, it was found that winter had a lower proportion of the coarse mode and a higher proportion of the condensation mode than the other three seasons, while the results of the other three seasons were consistent. The result might indicate that it was more likely that aerosol particles remained in the fine particle mode.
PCA identified four possible key sources of atmospheric PM through typical tracer species, namely, biomass combustion (48.42%), coal combustion (17.49%), secondary formation (16.07%) and vehicle exhaust (5.37%). AMBTs combined with a fire count map identified the source regions of air masses and the relationship between air mass pathways and combustion events during the sampling period of the four seasons and provided information on sources not included in the PCA analysis. To further explore the proportion of WSOC and HULIS in Shanghai from sources such as marine sources and the earth's crust, it is necessary to conduct further research to analyze the micro-structure of size-segregated HULIS in Shanghai.

Supplementary Materials:
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/ 10.3390/atmos12050526/s1, Table S1: The detailed sampling information including meteorological data and PM concentrations in this study. Table S2: The contribution rates of different species in each possible key source. Figure S1: The map of the sampling site and several characteristic emission point sources nearby. Figure

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.