{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021505376344086023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013824884792626729, 'mean_word_length': 5.9361702127659575, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Interrater Agreement on Employees' Job Performance: Review and Directions

This paper reviews the literature on interrater agreement in 360° feedback systems. Multirater performance appraisals, e.g., 360° feedback systems, have long been advocated as important mechanisms for enhancing individual and organizational performance. Our review of the empirical literature indicates that interrater agreement is a highly desired but not often accomplished goal in 360° feedback systems. A review of the assumptions concerning interrater agreement suggests avenues for the evolution of assessment scales used for development and evaluation in organizations.