{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01876172607879925, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00375234521575985, 'mean_word_length': 5.592592592592593, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Author Response: Automated Quantitative Pupillometry in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review of the Literature

We thank the commenters for their valuable input on our study.1 We consider it impossible to evaluate a patient for increased cranial pressure (ICP) using pupillometry without taking the patients' clinical context into account.1 One of the items considered in clinical context is the use of medications that would alter pupillary reactions to exclude potentially false-negative or false-positive pupillometric results.