{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02091439688715953, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.388198757763975, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
DIALOGUE OF CULTURES AS A TOOL OF THE MODERN PROFESSIONAL OF PEDAGOGICAL PROFILE

The article discusses the most important issue of personality-oriented general cultural basis of the future professional, its components and the main focus of the educational process to this result. The authors substantiate the model of culture of the "spiritualized professional" and the position that on this way one can only expect the development of society without global catastrophes. In the process of a person's "movement" to a profession in a certain educational space in pedagogy and psychology, its main vectors (directions) are distinguished, which allow us to structure and clarify our ideas about the possible trajectories of a student's movement in this space. Traditional education was actually determined by the sole focus on the acquisition by students of well-known, well-established information about the main objects of the relevant sciences, professional skills and practical skills. Despite the introduction of competence and competencies into everyday life, the focus on zuna still remains the basis of the set standards, educational programs, no matter how they are labeled differently, and in most cases it is it that is implemented in practice, no matter what teaching technologies are used by school teachers or university professors. A deeper penetration into the patterns of becoming a professional allows us to understand that a person becomes a professional as a result of a dialectical combination of two processes - mastering knowledge from the relevant professional field. This is the essence of professionalism. So, in the professional educational space, two relatively independent vectors can be distinguished, conventionally called the "vertical" and "horizontal" of the educational process. At the same time, in the scientific literature, there are different interpretations of these vectors: in one of the models, the formation of an individual style in professional activity and in the line of enriching one's professional awareness.