{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023665382498624106, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0170610897083104, 'mean_word_length': 5.226027397260274, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Functional outcomes following locking plate fixation of complex proximal humeral fractures.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of patients with complex proximal humeral fractures fixated by locking plate technology. Eighty-nine patients (27 men, 62 women) older than 50 years with 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures were treated using locking plate fixation and followed up for more than 1 year. Functional outcomes were assessed by using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Constant scores, and the complications were evaluated through physical and radiographic examinations. Mean DASH and Constant scores for all 89 patients were 19.6 and 66.6 points, respectively. No significant differences existed in the 2 scores between patients with 3- and 4-part fractures. Of the 71 patients without complications, 68 had an excellent functional outcome according to the DASH score, whereas 2 patients had an excellent outcome on the Constant score. For the 18 patients with complications, the functional outcomes were significantly poorer compared with patients without complications. According to the Constant score, all patients with complications were classified into a moderate or poor functional outcome, but the rate was 12% with the DASH score. In patients with 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures fixed with locking plate fixation, complications were the major cause of compromised functional outcomes. Based on these results, different conclusions would be reached when the functional outcome was assessed by using the DASH and Constant scores separately. Because the clinician-based Constant score may bias the results, patient-based assessments, such as the DASH score, are required for the evaluation of functional outcome after shoulder surgery.