{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022257551669316374, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.0, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Standardization of Chemical Language

Chemical language is there such a thing? The question is more appropriately answered by linguists than by the authors, who are chemists. Thus our definitions and other usage may not satisfy professional sociologists and linguists. Since this journal is primarily addressed to them, we beg their indulgence, and ask that they read further. In order to achieve a meeting of minds, we must try to overcome disciplinary barriers, and share ideas. A chemist wishing to describe to another chemist, or even to an informed layman, the results of an experiment, may write the following sentence: