{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015065913370998116, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.289940828402367, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
SUBJECT REVIEW: APPLIED LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE TEACHING

Language mirrors understanding of the same or other culture. Meaning is hardly encoded in the world community. Some linguists cannot solve language problems because of its abstractedness. Language communicators learn the second or foreign language at schools for three reasons. First, English is not their first language. Second, they have little or no educational background in experiencing what they know in another language. Third, they have not improved their communication skills in English. Analyzing the language as a mean of communication would not be learned enough without its practice. This paper gives an exclusive preview of applied linguistics. It defines the conversion of different areas of the study of language with second or foreign language education. The connection and distinction between applied linguistics and language teaching is addressed in the study comprehensively. The findings of this review suggests that the two areas need further investigation in the education system.