{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027314112291350532, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024279210925644917, 'mean_word_length': 5.534653465346534, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Philippe Chaslin and descriptive psychopathology

Although his contribution to descriptive psychopathology is arguably more important than Jaspers’s (it was certainly earlier), Philippe Chaslin remains unknown to Anglo-Saxon psychiatrists. Indeed, the fact that in Britain the German philosopher is considered as the source of all psychopathological wisdom results more from historical accident (i.e. the arrival of German emigres in 1933) than from any scholarly assessment or comparison. When Chaslin’s magnus opus appeared in 1912 (its 956 pages took him about 25 years to write, and include 350 finely described clinical cases),’ he already was a seasoned