{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02021563342318059, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.405172413793103, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Limits of High Politics: When National Security & International Economic Goals Conflict in American Foreign Policymaking

America's foreign economic policy and its security policy are often seen as mutually reinforcing in achieving the nation's goals in foreign affairs, with foreign economic policy being adjunct to security policy in issue areas where both are salient. This article challenges this view, using cases from America's policy toward the Third World. The author argues that, in this area, the two policies have not always been thought mutually supportive by policymakers, that foreign economic goals have not been accorded secondary status in policy debate and indeed often prevail over "high politics" when the two collide.