{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02485361707485991, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017565951016810428, 'mean_word_length': 4.871268829128546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Chemically modified dsRNA induces RNAi effects in insects in vitro and in vivo: A potential new tool for improving RNA-based plant protection

Global agriculture loses over $100 billion of produce annually to crop pests such as insects. Many of these crop pests either are not currently controlled by artificial means or have developed resistance against chemical pesticides. Long dsRNAs are capable of inducing RNAi in insects and are emerging as novel, highly selective alternatives for sustainable insect management strategies. However, there are significant challenges associated with RNAi efficacy in insects. In this study, we synthesized a range of chemically modified long dsRNAs in an approach to improve nuclease resistance and RNAi efficacy in insects. Our results showed that dsRNAs containing phosphorothioate modifications demonstrated increased resistance to southern green stink bug saliva nucleases. Phosphorothioate-modified and 2′-fluoro-modified dsRNA also demonstrated increased resistance to degradation by soil nucleases and increased RNAi efficacy in Drosophila melanogaster cell cultures. In live insects, we found chemically modified long dsRNAs successfully resulted in mortality in both stink bug and corn rootworm. These results provide further mechanistic insight into the dependence of RNAi efficacy on nucleotide modifications in the sense or antisense strand of the dsRNA in insects and demonstrate for the first time that RNAi can successfully be triggered by chemically modified long dsRNAs in insect cells or live insects.

Global agriculture loses over $100 billion of produce annually to crop pests such as insects. Many of these crop pests either are not currently controlled by artificial means or have developed resistance against chemical pesticides. Long dsRNAs are capable of inducing RNAi in insects and are emerging as novel, highly selective alternatives for sustainable insect management strategies. However, there are significant challenges associated with RNAi efficacy in insects. In this study, we synthesized a range of chemically modified long dsRNAs in an approach to improve nuclease resistance and RNAi efficacy in insects. Our results showed that dsRNAs containing phosphorothioate modifications demonstrated increased resistance to southern green stink bug saliva nucleases. Phosphorothioate-modified and 2 0 -fluoromodified dsRNA also demonstrated increased resistance to degradation by soil nucleases and increased RNAi efficacy in Drosophila melanogaster cell cultures. In live insects, we found chemically modified long dsRNAs successfully resulted in mortality in both stink bug and corn rootworm. These results provide further mechanistic insight into the dependence of RNAi efficacy on nucleotide modifications in the sense or antisense strand of the dsRNA in insects and demonstrate for the first time that RNAi can successfully be triggered by chemically modified long dsRNAs in insect cells or live insects.
Global agriculture loses over $100 billion of produce annually to crop pests such as insects. Many of these crop pests either have no current means of control or have developed resistance against traditional chemical pesticides. The economic cost of pest damage to agriculture, and particularly, the increasing cost due to increasing pesticide resistance is becoming a significant issue (1), with insects consuming 5% to 20% of major grain crops (2). Incidences of pesticide resistance have increased since the 1950s (3), and the spread of the natural range of resistant insects, such as Colorado potato beetle (CPB), with climate change threatens to magnify the amount of crop damage done by these species (4). Just a 1 C rise in temperatures could increase the total losses of rice, corn, and wheat alone by 10% to 25%, with a 2 C rise resulting in approximately 213 million tons of lost produce (2). In conjunction with an increasing world population, increased loss of produce to pests such as insects also threatens food security, particularly in the developing world.
Another related major driver for the development of new pesticides is the need for thriving populations of pollinator species such as bees, which are currently being reduced by climate change (5), and Varroa with associated viral infections leading to colony loss (6,7). There is also a debate about whether the use of existing pesticides results in adverse impacts on populations of beneficial species, for example pollinators such as bees (8).
Beyond the use of traditional small molecule pesticides as a 'chemical' method of pest control, an alternative 'biological' method of pest control has used Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin genes engineered into transgenic crop strains or Bt toxins applied directly to crops (9). However, many important insect pest species are not susceptible to this method of control, while other previously susceptible species have developed resistance to Bt toxins (9). Therefore, there is significant demand for the development of new classes of pesticide that can both overcome pesticide resistance of target species by utilizing new mechanisms of inducing mortality and are capable of overcoming issues with lack of target species selectivity, thereby avoiding causing harm to beneficial species.
RNA-based biocontrols are emerging as a novel alternative to chemical pesticides for sustainable control of crop pest insects (10)(11)(12). RNA-based biocontrols, consisting of long dsRNA, are capable of inducing RNAi in insects, resulting in selective degradation of a target mRNA and therefore reduced levels of its protein product (13). Targeting of the mRNA for a protein essential to the growth and survival of the insect results in mortality of the target insect; therefore, long dsRNAbased biocontrols are emerging as novel highly selective insecticides and have been proposed as a solution to the issues raised here (14).
The first successful studies demonstrating proof of principle for this approach in insects took place 15 years ago (10,11), and in the intervening years research has been undertaken demonstrating the possibility of using this approach for a wide range of targets and insect species (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). In many species, triggering RNAi has been demonstrated to be highly effective, inducing poor health and mortality of the target insects fast enough to significantly protect crop plants (17).
However, there are differences in RNAi efficacy between different insect orders and species due to variation in factors such as insect nuclease potency and upregulation (21), physiological pH (22), and dsRNA uptake and subsequent intracellular transport (22). Long dsRNA-based insecticides can also be degraded by nucleases, either in the environment (e.g., in soil) (23) or in the bodily fluids of the target insect (24). Some insect orders such as Lepidoptera demonstrate greater nuclease degradation of dsRNA in vivo than others (21). Degradation of dsRNA by nucleases in the environment and within the insect's body before it can induce RNAi is a major barrier to successful triggering of RNAi by ingestion of dsRNA in insects (24,25). Resistance of dsRNA to degrading nucleases and successful processing of dsRNA by the insect Dicer-2 nuclease-a key component of the insect RNAi pathway (26) -are therefore key factors that also affect the efficacy of dsRNA-based biocontrols.
The application of RNA-based products for insect management strategies typically requires long dsRNA substrates of at least 50 bp, with only dsRNAs of over 100 or 200 bp being effective in some insect species (17,27,28). In contrast, therapeutic siRNAs and DNA antisense oligonucleotides are between 8 and 50 bp in length (29) and require a range of chemical modifications and appropriate formulations to ensure efficacy in whole organism mammalian systems (29,30). The chemical modifications prevent their degradation in the bloodstream by extracellular nucleases (31), as well as improving delivery and transport of the siRNA (30).
Research into the use of RNAi as a therapeutic method has seen a large number of different types of RNA chemical modifications investigated, as reviewed in Shen and Corey (30).
Modifications to the bases themselves have seen some investigation (32), though most attention has focused on modifications to the ribose-phosphate backbone. Phosphorothioate (PS) modifications have been the most commonly utilized, as have modifications to the 2 0 position of the ribose sugar ring including 2 0 -F and 2 0 -O-Me, as well as locked nucleic acid and unlocked nucleic acid modifications (33)(34)(35)(36)(37).
Several of the chemical modifications examined here are known to increase resistance of siRNAs (38,39), antisense ss-siRNAs (39), antisense oligonucleotides (40), and chimeric oligonucleotides (41) to nuclease degradation in mammalian or other systems. Therefore, it was proposed that including these chemical modifications in long dsRNA could provide increased resistance to insect and environmental nucleases compared to unmodified dsRNA. This protection could potentially improve RNAi efficacy of RNA-based biocontrols compared to unmodified dsRNA, thus reducing the dose of dsRNA required to achieve high mortality of a target pest insect on a crop.
In this study, we have optimized the synthesis and purification of long dsRNA containing a range of different chemical modifications including PS, 2 0 -fluoro (2 0 F), and 5-hydroxymethyl (HMr) modifications (see Table 1). The effects of chemical modifications on the nuclease stability of long dsRNA were studied in vitro using southern green stink bug (Nezara viridula) (SGSB) saliva, CPB (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) gut secretions, and agricultural soil as examples of sources of nucleases likely to contribute to degradation of insecticidal dsRNA. The ability of model RNase III/Dicer family enzymes to successfully cleave long chemically modified dsRNA into endoribonucleaseprepared siRNAs (esiRNAs) in vitro was also investigated. Finally, the RNAi efficacy of long chemically modified dsRNA was examined both in vitro in Drosophila cell culture using a dual luciferase reporter assay and in vivo in SGSB nymphs and western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) (WCR) larvae using survival studies.
The results showed for the first time that long dsRNA containing PS modifications demonstrated increased resistance to stink bug saliva nucleases. In addition, both PS and Chemically modified dsRNA biocontrols 2 0 -F modified dsRNAs demonstrated increased resistance to soil nuclease degradation and increased RNAi efficacy in Drosophila cell cultures. Furthermore, the effects of the chemical modifications of long dsRNA on RNAi efficacy were also studied in live insects in both SGSB using injection assays and in WCR using feeding assays. The results demonstrate that the chemically modified long dsRNA resulted in successful RNAi in live insects as measured by insect mortality. To our knowledge, this is the first time that RNAi has successfully been triggered by chemically modified long dsRNA in insect cells or live insects. Differences in RNAi efficacy in vivo were also observed depending on whether modifications were in the antisense strand (i.e., the intended guide strand), the sense strand (i.e., the intended passenger strand), or both strands. These results provide further mechanistic insight into the effects of chemical modifications of dsRNA used in plant protection. It is anticipated that these results will provide important information for developing new alternative dsRNAbased plant protection products with improved nuclease resistance and RNAi efficacy.

Results
Synthesis of chemically modified dsRNA by in vitro transcription and analysis using gel electrophoresis and ion pair reverse phase HPLC A range of unmodified and chemically modified dsRNAs were synthesized from DNA templates by in vitro transcription (IVT). Chemically modified RNA was synthesized by substituting canonical natural NTPs for chemically modified NTP analogs in the IVT reaction, generating RNA with all of one or two of the four canonical nucleotides replaced by chemically modified analogs in either the sense, antisense, or both strands (see Fig. 1A). Where one canonical NTP was replaced by an α-thio NTP analog, the dsRNA is referred to as 1PS. dsRNAs synthesized in IVT reactions with two NTPs replaced by their corresponding α-thio NTP analogs are referred to as 2PS. dsRNAs with modifications in one strand are referred to as "Un-2PS" and "2PS-Un." Nomenclature for dsRNAs with 2 0 F and HMr modifications is the same as for PS, as per the examples shown. These dsRNAs were also synthesized in IVT reactions, with one or more canonical NTP replaced by a 2 0 -F NTP or 5-HMr NTP analog (see Fig. 1A).
T7 RNA polymerase was used in IVT reactions to synthesize unmodified, PS-modified, and 5-HMr-modified RNA. T7R&DNA polymerase was used in IVT reactions to synthesize 2 0 -F-modified RNA. Structures of the modified nucleotides incorporated are shown in Figure 1B.
Purified dsRNA was analyzed by gel electrophoresis and ion pair reverse phase (IP RP) HPLC to validate the synthesis of the chemically modified dsRNA and confirm the purity of the RNA sample (Figs. S1 and S2). Quantification of the dsRNA was performed using UV spectrophotometry and confirmed using the HPLC peak areas to ensure accurate quantification of the dsRNA prior to downstream applications. For use in functional assays, dsRNA containing one or more modified nucleotide analogs were in many cases mixed into pooled samples, for example, 2 0 F C dsRNA and 2 0 F U dsRNA were combined into a mixed pool of 1 2 0 F dsRNA. These pooled samples were as described in Table 1.
In vitro investigation of the effect of dsRNA chemical modifications on dsRNA degradation by nucleases and UV exposure dsRNA biocontrols applied in the field face many sources of degradation prior to uptake by the cells of the target insect. dsRNA applied to leaf surfaces may be degraded by UV exposure, whereas dsRNA applied to soil to target soil-dwelling insect crop pests may be degraded by the activity of nucleases present in the soil. Once ingested by the target insect, dsRNA has to pass through bodily fluids such as saliva, gut secretions, and hemolymph before reaching the RNAi machinery inside individual insect cells, and all of these fluids contain nucleases which may degrade the dsRNA en route, with the nuclease activity of these bodily fluids varying greatly between different insect species.
In order to determine potential differences in nuclease resistance between unmodified and chemically modified dsRNA, a number of chemically modified dsRNAs were incubated with a range of dilutions of SGSB saliva-containing Sf9 media and samples removed for analysis by gel electrophoresis at a number of time points (see Fig. 2A). The band intensities for each replicate of each time point and media dilution were normalized against the corresponding band intensity of the water only control band to calculate the "relative dsRNA stability" (see Figs. 2, B-D and S3). The results demonstrate that PS dsRNA was more resistant to stink bug saliva nuclease degradation than unmodified dsRNA. In contrast, no increase in stability of the 2 0 F-or HMr-modified dsRNA was observed. The differences are most pronounced at the 1/27 and 1/81 dilutions of saliva-containing media, and examples of these are highlighted in red boxes in Figure 2A. dsRNA with PS or 2 0 F modifications in only one strand demonstrated intermediate stability between that of unmodified dsRNA and dsRNA with the same chemical modification present in both strands (see Fig. S3).
Chemically modified dsRNA was also incubated in a range of dilutions of CPB gut secretions prior to analysis by gel electrophoresis and the band intensities used to determine the relative dsRNA stability (Fig. S4, B and C). The results show that in contrast to the stink bug saliva nuclease assay, there was no difference in stability of the dsRNA to degradation by CPB gut nucleases at any concentration, between unmodified, PS-modified, and 2 0 F-modified dsRNA. Unmodified and PS dsRNA incubated with a 1/1000 dilution of CPB gut secretions for a time course assay also demonstrated no difference in stability at any time point (Fig. S4, D and E). Further analysis was performed by incubating chemically modified dsRNA with an aqueous extract from agricultural soil prior to analysis by gel electrophoresis (see Fig. 3A) and the band intensities used to determine the relative dsRNA stability (see Fig. 3B). The results demonstrate that both PS-and 2 0 F-modified dsRNA are more resistant to degradation by soil nucleases compared to unmodified dsRNA.
Degradation of dsRNA by UV radiation was also assessed in a similar manner to (17). Samples were taken at a number of time points and analyzed by gel electrophoresis and the band intensities used to determine the relative dsRNA stability (Fig. S4, F and G). The results demonstrate that there was no difference in resistance of the dsRNA to UV degradation between unmodified and PS-modified dsRNA. The results for unmodified dsRNA are consistent with previous studies that demonstrated significant dsRNA degradation was observed after 2 h UV exposure (17). The results demonstrate clear differences in stability between unmodified and chemically modified dsRNAs for both the saliva and soil nuclease assays. In contrast, the rate of dsRNA degradation by CPB gut secretions or UV radiation was equal for unmodified or chemically modified dsRNA. These results highlight that different dsRNA chemical modifications potentially need to be utilized dependent upon the major source of dsRNA degradation in a particular application environment.
Processing of chemically modified dsRNA substrates in vitro by Dicer/RNase III enzymes For insecticidal dsRNA to be functional in insect cells, they must be capable of being processed into functional siRNAs by the Dicer-2 enzyme (42). This processing may be affected by the presence of chemical modifications in the dsRNA, either at the binding step or cleavage step. In order to examine the . dsRNAs with PS linkages (PS) were synthesized in IVT reactions. Where one canonical NTP was replaced by an α-thio NTP analog, the dsRNA is referred to as 1PS. dsRNAs synthesized in IVT reactions with two NTPs replaced by their corresponding α-thio NTP analogs are referred to as 2PS. dsRNAs with modifications in one strand are referred to as "Un-2PS," "2PS-Un" with the format "antisense strand-sense strand," or "guide strand-passenger strand" in terms of functional RISCs (discounting nontargeting RISCs where the sense strand is loaded as the guide strand). Nomenclature for dsRNAs with 2 0 F and HMr modifications is the same as for PS, as per the examples shown; and these dsRNAs were also synthesized in IVT reactions, with one or more canonical NTP replaced by a 2 0 -F NTP or 5-HMr NTP analogs. B, structures of the modified nucleotide analogs. IVT, in vitro transcription.
ability of Dicer enzymes to process chemically modified long dsRNA into esiRNAs, two different types of Dicer/RNase III family enzyme were used: bacterial RNase III and Giardia intestinalis Dicer. These two enzymes bind and process dsRNA in distinct ways and contain fewer functional domains than insect or mammalian Dicer enzymes (see Fig. S5).
In vitro assays were performed using unmodified, PS, 2 0 -F, and 5-HMr dsRNA to determine the efficacy of processing of the chemically modified dsRNA to esiRNAs by both enzymes. dsRNA was incubated with RNase III or Giardia Dicer, followed by analysis by gel electrophoresis (see Fig. 4). The results show that bacterial RNase III successfully cleaved all the unmodified and chemically modified dsRNA substrates to esiRNAs (Fig. 4, A and B). Giardia Dicer successfully generated esiRNAs from unmodified dsRNA, however, failed to fully process 1HMr, 2PS, and 2 2 0 F dsRNA substrates into esiRNA  Fig. 4C). dsRNA with 2 0 -F modifications in only one strand also demonstrated greater suitability as a substrate for Giardia Dicer than dsRNA with 2 0 -F modifications in both strands (Fig. 4D). However, dsRNA with 2 0 -F modifications in both strands was still partly processed to generate esiRNAs. While 2 2 0 F dsRNA was not completely processed by Giardia Dicer in vitro under the conditions used, there is evidence from previous studies that indicate that 1 2 0 F dsRNA with a lower number of 2 0 -F modifications can be effectively processed by Giardia Dicer (43).

Chemically modified dsRNA induces RNAi in vitro in an insect cell line (Drosophila Kc167)
In terms of studying the effects of dsRNA modifications on RNAi efficacy, our first aim was to establish whether chemically modified dsRNA could induce RNAi in insect cells. Drosophila melanogaster Kc167 cells were selected as the model system in which to assess these factors. In order to ascertain changes in RNAi efficacy due to the presence of chemical modifications, the ability of the dsRNA to trigger degradation of their target mRNA was quantified by a dual luciferase assay reporter system. Quantitative analysis of RNAi-induced degradation was carried out with luciferase assays in Kc167 cells transfected with luciferase reporter system plasmids. A wide range of dsRNA concentrations were used in order to generate dose curves for a range of unmodified and chemically modified FLuc dsRNAs targeting firefly luciferase luminescence (FL). Unmodified F59C6.5 nontargeting dsRNA was used as a control, along with controls with no dsRNA. Control Renilla luciferase luminescence (RL) values were normalized to the mean RL value of wells containing no dsRNA (Fig. S6) and target FL values normalized to RL values (Fig. S7). The results in Figs. S6 and S7 show that differences in normalized FL/RL values obtained between unmodified FLuc dsRNA and chemically modified FLuc dsRNA in later experiments are due to differences in RNAi efficacy and not a result of cytotoxic effects or assay variation.
The results of the luciferase assays comparing RNAi efficacy of unmodified and chemically modified FLuc dsRNA are shown in Figure 5, and the full dose curves from the assay were used to determine IC50 values. The results show an improvement in RNAi efficacy for the 1PS dsRNA (IC50, 7.6 ng) and 2PS dsRNA (IC50, 2.8 ng) compared to unmodified dsRNA (IC50, 20.6 ng) (see Fig. 5A). Replicate data and comparisons to the negative control dsRNA show no evidence of the control dsRNA inducing RNAi knockdown (see Fig. S8). The results of the luciferase assay comparing RNAi efficacy of unmodified and 2 0 F FLuc dsRNA are shown in Figure 5B. The full dose curves from the assay were used to determine IC50 values and show that 1 2 0 F dsRNA demonstrates an improvement in RNAi efficacy with an IC50 (0.8 ng) compared to unmodified dsRNA IC50 (9.8 ng). The 2 2 0 F dsRNA demonstrated a similar IC50 (7.0 ng) to unmodified dsRNA. The results of the luciferase assay comparing RNAi efficacy of unmodified and HMr FLuc dsRNA are shown in Figure 5C. The full dose curves from the assay were used to determine IC50 values and show that the lowest IC50 value was obtained for 1HMr dsRNA (7.9 ng) compared to unmodified dsRNA (21.8 ng). In contrast, the IC50 value of 2HMr dsRNA was 81.2 ng indicating a reduction in RNAi efficacy.
Chemically modified dsRNA can induce RNAi resulting in mortality in vivo in live stink bug (N. viridula) when delivered by microinjection In order to determine whether chemically modified dsRNA could induce RNAi in insects when directly delivered, chemically modified dsRNA was injected into N2 stage SGSB nymphs and their survival monitored over the course of a number of days. Stink bugs were chosen as a model organism as they are a highly relevant potential target crop pest insect for a dsRNA insecticide product, and their size is convenient for both ease of injection and the dose of dsRNA required. An initial assay in which a large amount of dsRNA was delivered to the insects demonstrated that unmodified dsRNA and dsRNA containing 2PS or 2 2 0 F modifications in either the sense or antisense strand could induce high levels of mortality through RNAi of a critical target mRNA compared to control injections of water or a nontargeting GFP dsRNA (Fig. 6A). Further analysis was performed, in which precise and controlled doses of dsRNA were delivered into N2 stink bugs, which confirmed that both unmodified and PS (1PS in both strands) dsRNA could induce high levels of mortality and demonstrated that nontargeting control dsRNA containing PS modifications (2PS in both strands) did not induce mortality through toxic effects (Fig. 6B).
Chemically modified dsRNA can induce RNAi resulting in mortality in vivo in WCR (D. virgifera virgifera) when delivered orally in an artificial diet Following successful induction of RNAi and insect mortality using chemically modified dsRNA in N2 stage SGSB, further insect bioassays were conducted using WCR larvae. WCR larvae were chosen as a model organism as they are a highly relevant potential target crop pest insect for a dsRNA-based insecticide, and their size allows for small controlled doses of dsRNA at a range of concentrations to be delivered orally in high throughput screening assays to analyze RNAi efficacy of different dsRNAs.
General toxicity of the chemically modified dsRNA, independent of its RNAi efficacy, was ruled out by synthesizing nontargeting GFP dsRNA with PS, 2 0 F, and HMr modifications, which were then tested in a WCR diet plate feeding bioassay. The survival results from the diet plate feeding assay after 7 days, using 0.1 μg of dsRNA per well and performed in duplicate, are shown in Figure 7A. Chi-square tests demonstrate that there was no significant difference in insect mortality between insects in wells treated with chemically modified GFP and those with unmodified GFP dsRNA or control wells with no dsRNA. In contrast, an unmodified targeting dsRNA (target B Unmod) demonstrated high levels of insecticidal activity. The results indicate that the chemical modifications present in the dsRNA used in this experiment are not toxic to the insects and result in no significant increase in mortality above the mortality for unmodified nontargeting dsRNA. A further nontargeting control experiment was performed using a target B scrambled dsRNA, GFP dsRNA, and the target B unmodified dsRNA as a positive control. The target B scrambled control dsRNA showed the same low levels of insect mortality as the GFP dsRNA, whereas target B unmodified dsRNA resulted in dose-dependent mortality as seen previously (Figs. 7B and S9). This provides further confidence that mortality as a result of exposure to targeting unmodified dsRNA is due to an RNAi effect rather than a cytotoxic effect due to the base composition and further validates the use of the nontargeting GFP dsRNA as a negative control across the different assays in this study.
Following optimization of the WCR dsRNA diet plate feeding assay using unmodified dsRNA, a range of PS, 2 0 F, and HMr chemically modified dsRNA were used in mortality assays and compared to unmodified dsRNA, with nontargeting GFP dsRNA, and no dsRNA wells as controls. Initially, dsRNA concentrations of 100, 10, 1, and 0.1 ng per well were used, in order to ascertain which chemically modified dsRNA had similar or different activity to unmodified dsRNA. 2PS and 2 2 0 F dsRNA were only tested at the highest two concentrations, as a test assay suggested these dsRNA had greatly reduced efficacy, therefore lower concentrations would likely result in complete loss of activity ( Fig. S10 and S11). WCR larvae were seeded onto the plates and mortality scored and normalized (see Experimental procedures). Full mortality curves are shown in Fig. S12, and a summary of the day 7 final survival results are shown in Figure 7C.
The majority of RNAi-induced mortality occurred between days 3 and 6, though our analysis was focused on the final day 7 mortality. The results for 5-HMr-modified dsRNA demonstrate that the presence of 1HMr modifications in both strands of the dsRNA did not affect RNAi efficacy as measured by insect mortality, as the final percentage survival of HMr dsRNA-treated insects was similar to those of unmodified dsRNA at the two concentrations tested.
In contrast, the results for PS and 2 0 F dsRNA demonstrate clear differences in survival profile and final percentage survival compared to the unmodified dsRNA. Moreover, differences in RNAi efficacy as measured by insect mortality were evident depending on whether the modifications were present in the antisense strand (the intended guide strand) or sense strand (the intended passenger strand). Feeding of the dsRNA with PS modifications present only in the sense strand (target B Un-2PS) resulted in a final percentage survival similar to unmodified dsRNA at 100 and 10 ng. dsRNA with PS modifications in the sense strand is therefore effective at inducing RNAi. dsRNA with PS modifications present only in the antisense strand (target B 2PS-Un) demonstrated moderate insecticidal activity at 100 and 10 ng, however, was less efficacious than unmodified and Un-2PS dsRNA. At the lower two concentrations of 1 and 0.1 ng per well, target B Un-2PS and 2PS-Un dsRNAs showed a loss of RNAi activity compared to unmodified dsRNA, with survival of approximately 60% or above, compared to approximately 30% and 65% for 1 and 0.1 ng of unmodified dsRNA, respectively.
Insects fed dsRNA with PS modifications in both strands (target B 2PS) have percentage survivals of approximately 40% and 65% for 100 and 10 ng of dsRNA per well, respectively, demonstrating a further reduction in the RNAi efficacy of the dsRNA. PS-modified dsRNA demonstrates a trend of increasing RNAi efficacy as follows: 2PS < 2PS-Un < Un-2PS < unmodified.
The results for insects fed 2 0 F-modified dsRNA show that the overall RNAi efficacy of dsRNA with 2 0 F modifications in only one strand of dsRNA (Un-2 2 0 F, 2 2 0 F-Un) was similar to that of unmodified dsRNA at the highest two concentrations, though reduced slightly at lower concentrations for dsRNA with 2 0 F modifications in the sense strand (Un-2 2 0 F). In contrast, dsRNA with 2 0 F modifications in both strands (2 2 0 F) showed a marked reduction in RNAi efficacy similar to 2PS dsRNA, with survival of 40% and 60%, respectively, for 100 and 10 ng of dsRNA.
Further analysis was performed by combining data analyzing 10 ng of each dsRNA from replicate experiments (Figs. S10 and S11) and plotted along with the mean of the two replicates (Fig. 7D). The combined replicates and average confirm the previous trends in RNAi efficacy for this assay. The results show that Un-2PS, 2 2 0 F-Un, and 1HMr dsRNAs all have similar insecticidal activity to unmodified dsRNA, although the variation between replicates for Un-2PS suggests it may have a slightly reduced efficacy. 2PS-Un and Un-2 2 0 F have intermediate insecticidal efficacy and are statistically significantly different from their counterpart one strandmodified dsRNAs. 2 2 0 F dsRNA has low insecticidal activity; however, it is still significantly more efficacious than nontargeting GFP dsRNA, whereas the level of mortality induced by 2PS dsRNA is not significantly different from that of GFP dsRNA, suggesting 2PS dsRNA has no effective insecticidal activity at this concentration.
To further analyze the effects of PS modifications in a dsRNA molecule on RNAi efficacy, a wider range of dsRNA including Un-1PS, 1PS-Un, and 1PS alongside the previously studied Un-2PS, 2PS-Un, and 2PS dsRNAs were synthesized for use in a WCR plate feeding assay. For each dsRNA, 10 and 1 ng of dsRNA per well were used, in conjunction with GFP dsRNA and wells containing no dsRNA as controls. The assay set up, scoring, and normalization were conducted as before. Two replicate assays were performed, and the full survival curve results are shown in Fig. S13 (1PS) and Fig. S14 (2PS) and final day 7 percentage survival summarized in Figure 8A. Variation was observed at some time points, particularly around day 3; however, the replicates show good agreement on final day 7 percentage survival (Fig. 8A).
The results show that for both 1PS and 2PS dsRNA, dsRNA with PS modifications in the sense strand (Un-1PS, Un-2PS) showed slightly increased RNAi activity compared to their RNAi efficacy compared to unmodified dsRNA. Furthermore, increasing the number of PS modifications in the sense strand resulted in reduced RNAi activity.
2PS dsRNA was markedly less active than 2PS-Un dsRNA or any other targeting dsRNA, again demonstrating no significant difference in insecticidal activity compared to GFP control dsRNA. These results demonstrate a progressive decrease in RNAi activity due to the increasing number of PS modifications. The previous observations for 2PS-modified dsRNA regarding the link between RNAi efficacy and which strand of the dsRNA contains PS modifications were also demonstrated to be true for 1PS-modified dsRNA. It was noted that the rank order of RNAi efficacy for the 2PS dsRNA was the same as in the previous screens.

Unmodified and PS dsRNAs demonstrate insecticidal activity when applied to biologically active soil containing nucleases
In order to test the hypothesis that PS dsRNA would maintain their insecticidal activity in soil for longer than unmodified dsRNA, unmodified and various PS dsRNA were used in a soil feeding assay. This assay involved the application of dsRNA to the same defined, biologically active soil used in the soil nuclease assay. This contains naturally occurring live microorganisms and active nucleases, within which WCR larvae were then placed for around 24 h. The larvae were then transferred to diet plates, and their mortality scored and normalized as for the diet plate feeding assay.
The selected unmodified, 1PS, and 2PS dsRNA were analyzed across a concentration range 0.6 to 15 μg of dsRNA per soil sample. dsRNA was added to two soil samples for each concentration of each dsRNA. The results are shown in Figures 8B and S15 and S16. Un-1PS and Un-2PS dsRNA demonstrated similar insecticidal activities to unmodified dsRNA at 15 and 5 μg, as did 1PS dsRNA at the highest concentration of 15 μg. At 5 μg, Un-1PS demonstrated efficacy 10% above that of unmodified dsRNA, although the difference was not statistically significant. At 15 μg, 2PS dsRNA also has low to moderate insecticidal activity, significantly above that of GFP control dsRNA. Also, of note was the greater insecticidal activity demonstrated by Un-2PS dsRNA compared to 1PS dsRNA at 5 μg.

Discussion
We synthesized a range of chemically modified long dsRNA substrates to study the effects of these chemical modifications on nuclease resistance and RNAi efficacy both in vitro and in vivo in insects. This was with a view to using chemical modifications to improve the efficacy of dsRNA-based insect biocontrols. The results obtained demonstrate that long chemically modified dsRNA that target insect mRNAs can be successfully synthesized in vitro, and a number of the chemically modified dsRNAs resulted in improved resistance against insect and environmental nucleases. We demonstrated-to our knowledge, for the first time-that long chemically modified dsRNAs are effective triggers for RNAi in a Drosophila (Diptera) insect cell line (Kc167 cells), live SGSB nymphs (Hemiptera), and live WCR larvae (Coleoptera). The results also demonstrate that in the quantitative cell-based assay, several of the chemically modified dsRNA, including 1PS, 2PS, and 1 2 0 F modified dsRNA, demonstrated improved RNAi efficacy compared to unmodified dsRNA.
The overall RNAi efficacy of a chemically modified dsRNA depends on a complex combination of how the chemical modifications affect environmental and insect nuclease degradation; cellular dsRNA uptake and trafficking; Dicer binding and cleavage to esiRNAs; RISC binding, duplex unwinding, and strand selection; and target mRNA binding and cleavage. The results presented in this study provide further mechanistic insight into the effects of a number of chemical modifications on dsRNA used for insect control and the potential advantages for future applications.
Improving the stability of dsRNA to environmental nucleases, including nucleases present in the soil, insect saliva, gut secretions, and hemolymph, are potential strategies that could be utilized to improve the RNAi efficacy of RNA-based products. Nuclease stability studies using stink bug saliva nucleases and soil nucleases showed that PS dsRNA had increased resistance when compared to unmodified dsRNA. In addition, 2 0 -F-modified dsRNA demonstrated increased resistance against degradation by soil nucleases. These results are consistent with previous studies, which showed the increased half-life and resistance of PS and 2 0 -F siRNAs and antisense oligonucleotides to degradation by mammalian nucleases (38)(39)(40)(41). These results for the first time demonstrate the ability to improve the stability of dsRNA toward insect and/or agricultural environmental nucleases using PS and 2 0 -F modifications. However, none of the chemically modified dsRNAs used in this study demonstrated increased resistance toward CPB gut nucleases or environmental degradation as a result of UV radiation exposure.
RNA chemical modifications that increase nuclease stability may reduce the RNAi efficacy of a dsRNA by hindering key steps in the RNAi pathway itself including inhibiting Dicer processing of long dsRNA into esiRNAs. Indeed, the results of our in vitro Dicer/RNase III cleavage assays demonstrate that the ability of these enzymes to process dsRNA to esiRNAs can be affected by certain chemical modifications. In addition, variation in the ability of Dicer to cleave some chemically modified dsRNA may explain differences in RNAi efficacy seen between insect species or between live insect and in vitro insect cell RNAi assays. However, previous studies using small chemically modified dsRNA duplexes showed Dicer processing is not required for incorporation into RISC and gene silencing (44). Therefore, it may be that some fragments of the long dsRNA that are larger than the typical 21 to 25 bp size of canonical siRNAs can still be incorporated into functional silencing complexes.
The analysis of the effect of chemical modifications of long dsRNA on bacterial RNase III and Dicer processing in vitro showed that bacterial RNase III was able to cleave dsRNA containing PS, 2 0 F, and HMr modifications into siRNAs. These results are consistent with previous observations demonstrating that bacterial RNase III cleavage specificity is not altered by PS bonds (45). Results of Giardia Dicer processing of long dsRNA containing PS, 2 0 F, and HMr modifications demonstrated that the presence of these modifications reduced the ability to cleave the long dsRNA into esiRNAs. These results are consistent with previous studies using small dsRNA duplexes (25 bp) containing minimal 2 0 -O-Me modifications that inhibited the ability of human recombinant Dicer to process the dsRNA to 21 bp siRNA products (44). In addition, 27 bp dsRNA with 2 0 -methoxyribonucleotide substitutions at the cleavage sites also prevented cleavage in in vitro human Dicer cleavage assays (46). However, Giardia Dicer has been shown to cleave dsRNA with 2 0 -F modifications (43). The observed differences in processing of long chemically modified dsRNA substrates are potentially reflected by differences between the constituent domains and mechanism of action of bacterial RNase III and Dicer. For example, RNase III binds dsRNA with a dsRNA-binding domain, whereas Giardia Dicer binds 2 nt ssRNA overhangs using only a PAZ domain (47)(48)(49), and bacterial RNase III has a single RNase III domain and functions as part of a homodimer (48,(50)(51)(52). In contrast, Giardia, insect, and human Dicer have two RNase III domains in the same molecule and function as monomers (49,53). Additionally, Dicer nucleases with similar domain architectures such as human Dicer and Drosophila Dicer-2 (see Fig. S5) will have significant differences in domain size and amino acid composition that may result in variations in their ability to bind and cleave chemically modified dsRNA.
The RNAi efficacy of the chemically modified long dsRNA was studied both in vitro in Drosophila insect cells in and in vivo in live insect feeding assays. The results of the quantitative dual luciferase assays showed that long dsRNA with chemical modifications in both the antisense and sense strands are potent RNAi inducers in Drosophila cells (see Fig. 5). Moreover, the results demonstrate that dsRNA containing 2PS modifications in both strands results in improved RNAi efficacy compared to unmodified dsRNA (IC50, 2.8 ng compared to 20.6 ng). Further studies to analyze RNAi efficacy based on insect mortality using chemically modified dsRNA in N2 stage SGSB showed that the chemically modified dsRNA used were all effective, resulting in similar insect mortality after 7 days compared to the unmodified dsRNA (see Fig. 6). In vivo experiments using WCR larvae where RNAi efficacy was again measured by insect mortality also showed that the RNAi efficacy for both the 1PS dsRNA or 2 2 0 F dsRNA with modifications in only one strand was similar to unmodified dsRNA. However, further increasing the amount of the chemical modification present (2PS dsRNA and 2 2 0 F dsRNA with both strands modified) resulted in a significant reduction in RNAi efficacy and for some concentrations almost total loss of observable insect mortality. These findings were unexpected given the improved RNAi efficacy observed in Drosophila Kc167 cells and the increased resistance observed for 2PS dsRNA to stink bug saliva nucleases.
There is clearly a difference in how the heavily modified 2PS and 2 0 F dsRNAs affect cellular uptake, Dicer-2 processing, and/or RISC assembly between whole organisms and insect cells. It is likely that there is not a universal mechanism in which these chemical modifications modulate overall RNAi efficacy in all situations or species. Rather, use of RNA chemical modifications to improve the efficacy of dsRNA insecticides is highly specific to the application environment (e.g., leaf or soil) and the target species, in much the same way that delivery and uptake of unmodified dsRNA varies between species and application environments (21,22). It is therefore conceivable that tailoring the type and strand distribution of chemical modifications in a dsRNA insecticide could be an additional step in the developmental process of dsRNA-based plant protection along with current considerations such as mRNA target region and formulation.
Results in this study on the effects of the chemical modifications in either the antisense or sense strands also provide further mechanistic insight. Where the RNAi efficacies of dsRNAs with chemical modifications in either of the two strands but not both strands are similar to each other but different from unmodified dsRNA, this suggests Dicer processing or uptake may be affected by the modifications but RISC loading is unaffected. Conversely, where one of the dsRNAs with chemical modifications in one strand is more efficacious than the other, this suggests the modification may primarily affect strand selection or RISC loading, though differences in efficacy from unmodified dsRNA may include components due to uptake or Dicer processing as well.
For example, the results from the WCR feeding assay showed a greater reduction in RNAi efficacy when the PS modifications are present in the antisense strand. This is clearly observed in the WCR feeding assay for 2PS-Un dsRNA compared to Un-2PS (see Fig. 7). These results suggest that in the live insects, chemical modifications in the antisense strand may affect RISC assembly, discarding of the sense (passenger) strand, and subsequent use of the antisense strand to bind the mRNA target and resulting mRNA cleavage. These results are consistent with previous studies where mammalian RNAi machinery has demonstrated preferences for chemical modifications in one strand of an siRNA duplex. siRNAs containing chemical modifications in the sense strand have been shown to demonstrate greater RNAi efficacy than those with chemical modifications in the antisense strand (54,55).
In contrast, dsRNA with 2 0 F modifications in the sense strand showed reduced RNAi efficacy compared to that of unmodified dsRNA in WCR. This suggests that selection, binding, and discarding of the sense strand (the intended passenger strand) during loading of the antisense strand (the intended guide strand) into the RISC may be affected by 2 0 F modifications. Increasing the level of chemical modifications in both strands (2PS and 2 2 0 F) resulted in a significant reduction in RNAi efficacy as measured by insect mortality. This result, in conjunction with the results of the in vitro Dicer/RNase III assays, suggests that this may inhibit Dicer-2 processing of the long dsRNA, which may also contribute to reduced RNAi efficacy of the 2PS dsRNA compared to the 2PS-Un dsRNA observed in WCR. The further reduction in RNAi efficacy for 2PS and 2 2 0 F dsRNA may also be a result of increased issues with RISC loading or increased difficulty with duplex unwinding due to changes in thermal stability. Further investigation is required to determine if one or several of these are major factors in overall RNAi efficacy of a chemically modified dsRNA in insects.
The results of the WCR feeding screens conducted in diet plates showed that although a number of PS-modified dsRNAs had similar RNAi efficacy compared to unmodified dsRNA, none demonstrated improved RNAi efficacy. Therefore, further experiments were performed to determine if the potential benefits in improved resistance of the PS-modified dsRNA to both insect and soil nucleases impacted on overall RNAi efficacy. As WCR larvae feed on the roots of corn plants, their environment is the surrounding soil. Soil contains a variety of live and decaying microorganisms, arthropods, and plant matter, all of which are sources of extracellular nucleases capable of degrading insecticidal dsRNA prior to it being ingested by the target insect. Protection against the activity of these nucleases by PS modifications as seen in Figures 2 and 3 could therefore ensure insecticidal PS dsRNA would remain intact and active in the soil for a greater length of time compared to unmodified dsRNA. 2 0 F dsRNA also demonstrated increased soil nuclease resistance, however, demonstrated variable RNAi efficacy between in vitro and in vivo screening assays and so was not tested.
The results of the WCR soil feeding assay (Fig. 8B) demonstrate that Un-1PS and Un-2PS dsRNA had very similar efficacies to unmodified dsRNA at several concentrations, whereas Un-1PS and Un-2PS dsRNA were slightly less effective than unmodified dsRNA in the plate feeding assays at most concentrations (see Fig. 8A). This suggests the increase in soil nuclease resistance due to the PS modifications may be improving the overall efficacy of the dsRNA insecticide. However, none of the modified dsRNAs demonstrated greater efficacy than unmodified dsRNA in the soil feeding assay; so, while there may have been some improvement, further work is required to determine how to increase the efficacy of PS-modified dsRNA to be greater than that of unmodified dsRNA.
These results demonstrate the potential for the application of chemically modified long dsRNA-based insect control. Further studies analyzing the effects of a wider range of chemical modifications (e.g., boranophosphates, 2 0 -O-methyl, phosphorodithioate, and locked nucleic acid) may generate further improvements in the resistance toward insect and environmental nucleases and demonstrate improved overall RNAi efficacy in vivo. Chemical modification of long dsRNA provides a number of potential advantages, including increased stability and specificity for the development of long dsRNAs for applications in insect management strategies. Further work is required in order to determine how chemically modified dsRNA result in different RNAi efficacies in different insect species, or between cell-based and live insect systems, and which steps of the RNAi pathway in insects are responsible for the differences observed. These additional insights could help in the future development of chemically modified dsRNA insect control.

Experimental procedures
Synthesis of dsRNA DNA templates for in vitro transcription of dsRNA were produced by PCR. DNA templates were generated with either a single T7 RNA polymerase promoter to synthesize ssRNA templates or two T7 RNA polymerase promoters in opposing directions to generate dsRNA. PCR was performed using 12.5 μl KAPA2G Fast PCR mastermix (KAPA Biosystems) containing reaction buffer, MgCl 2 , dNTP mix and DNA polymerase; 1 μl of initial DNA template (approximately 10-50 ng); 1.25 μl each of 10 μM forward and reverse primers (IDT) (see Table S1). PCR reactions used the following conditions: 95 C for 3 min; 30 cycles of: 95 C for 15 s, 60 C for 15 s, 72 C for 3 s, and 72 C for 1 min. Final PCR DNA products were purified using a Qiagen QIAquick PCR Purification Kit following the kit protocol and used as the DNA templates for subsequent IVT reactions.

IP RP HPLC analysis of RNA
Samples were analyzed by IP RP HPLC on a passivated Agilent 1100 series HPLC using a ProSwift RP-1S Monolith column (50 mm × 4.6 mm I.D. ThermoFisher). Chromatograms were generated using UV detection at a wavelength of 260 nm. The chromatographic analysis was performed using the following conditions: buffer A -0.1 M triethylammonium acetate pH 7.0 (Fluka), 0.1% acetonitrile (ThermoFisher); buffer B -0.1 M triethylammonium acetate pH 7.0, 25% acetonitrile. RNA/DNA was analyzed using the following gradient. Gradient starting at 20% buffer B to 30% in 1 min, followed by a linear extension to 70% buffer B over 11.5 min, then extended to 100% buffer B over 1 min, held at 100% buffer B for 2 min, reduced to 20% in 0.1 min and held at 20% for 4.5 min at a flow rate of 0.75 ml/min at 50 or 75 C, with temperature controlled by an external column oven (Transgenomic).
Stink bug saliva nuclease degradation assay Saliva was collected in feeding sachets produced by vacuum pumping Parafilm over a 96-well plate. The resulting indentations over wells were loaded with 25 μl Sf-900 insect cell culture media (Gibco), sachets sealed, and placed over 96-well mesh bottom plates containing one N2 SGSB nymph per well. The remaining saliva-containing Sf9 media were extracted by syringe after 3 days of the insects feeding, pooled, and stored at −20 C until required.
The initial saliva-containing Sf9 media were successively diluted 1:3 in MilliQ water across rows of a 96-well plate, down to 1:729, plus a water-only control row for each dsRNA tested. Two technical replicates were set up for each dsRNA, with one whole set of replicates in each of two separate plates. About 2.6 μg of dsRNA in 20 μl of nuclease-free water was loaded per well and the plates sealed. Plates were incubated at RT on a shaker plate. Twenty microliters samples were collected for each combination of dsRNA and saliva-media dilution at 2, 4, and 6 h and after overnight incubation (approximately 16 h). Collected samples were dispensed into fresh 96-well plates containing gel loading dye and stored at −20 C until thawed for gel electrophoresis analysis.

Agricultural soil supernatant nuclease degradation assay
Soil supernatant was prepared by mixing 0.1 g of live soil obtained from Stein Switzerland (with a composition 1/3 sand, 1/3 loam, and 1/3 clay, that was stored in the refrigerator between collection and use) with 200 μl of nuclease-free water, vortexing for 2 min, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 1 min, and collection of the supernatant. The pH of the soil in water and 0.01 M CaCl2 was determined as 7.6 and 7.4, respectively, giving confidence that any dsRNA degradation seen was due to nuclease activity in the soil and not to alkaline hydrolysis of the RNA.
Reaction solutions were made up containing 1 μg of dsRNA in 2 μl of water, 3 μl of soil supernatant for a total of 5 μl per time point (25 μl total), and reactions incubated at 37 C. Five microliters samples were removed at each time point (0 h, 4 h, 23 h, 28 h, and 48 h), mixed with formamide loading dye, and frozen at −20 C prior to agarose gel electrophoresis analysis. Reactions were performed in triplicate, with three soil supernatants made from different samples of the same type of soil.
CPB gut secretion nuclease degradation assay CPB gut secretions were collected from L4 larvae by agitating their mouths with a glass capillary until gut contents was expelled, which was collected in a microcentrifuge tube incubated on ice, and frozen at −20 C until use. Gut secretion dilutions were created by diluting in nuclease-free water. For the dilution assay, reaction solutions were made up for each dilution of gut secretion containing 1 μg of dsRNA in 2 μl of water and 3 μl of gut secretion dilution. Reactions were incubated at 37 C for 30 min, then formamide loading dye was added, and samples frozen at −20 C until gel analysis. For the time course assay, reaction solutions were made up containing 1 μg of dsRNA in 2 μl of water per time point and 3 μl of 1/1000 gut secretion dilution per time point. Reactions were incubated at 37 C and 5 μl samples were removed at each time point (15 min, 30 min, 1 h, and 2 h), mixed with formamide loading dye, and frozen at −20 C until gel analysis.

UV exposure degradation assay
Reaction solutions were made up containing 1 μg of dsRNA in 10 μl of nuclease-free water per time point in UV-permeable microcuvettes sealed with caps to prevent evaporation. Microcuvettes were exposed to 254 nm UV radiation in a CL-1000 100 μJ/cm 2 UV crosslinker (UVP) and 10 μl samples removed at time points of 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h. Formamide loading dye was added and samples frozen at −20 C until gel analysis.

RNase A nuclease degradation assay
1U RNase A (Thermo Fisher) was incubated with 1 μg dsRNA in 0.5 M NaCl (10 μl total volume) for 20 min at 37 C, followed by addition of formamide loading dye and immediate gel electrophoresis analysis.
In vitro Dicer/RNase III processing assays RNase III assay-1 U (0.5 μl) RNase III (NEB Short Cut RNase III) was combined with 1 μl of 10× reaction buffer, 1 μl of 10× MnCl 2 , and 1 μg of dsRNA and reactions made up to 10 μl with nuclease-free water. Reactions were incubated at 37 C for 20 min.

Gel electrophoresis analysis
Frozen samples from saliva nuclease degradation assays were analyzed on 1% (w/v) agarose gels stained with GelRed (Biotium) and visualized on a BioRad Gel Doc EZ Imager with a UV transilluminator. Frozen samples from all other nuclease/ degradation/Dicer processing assays were analyzed on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels and gels stained using ethidium bromide. Quantification of gel bands was performed with Fiji (ImageJ) image analysis software using the in-built gel band quantification tool. Results were given as 'relative dsRNA stability index'. Relative dsRNA stability index = (Band intensity of dsRNA incubated with nuclease or exposed to UV)/(Band intensity of dsRNA incubated with water or sample from time point 0).

Insect cell culture
Drosophila Kc167 cells were cultured in Hyclone CCM3 Insect Media (GE Life Sciences) containing 1% Pen-Strep (Lonza). Cells were thawed in medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma Life Sciences), then once established, cultured in serum-free CCM3 medium with Pen-Strep for amplification and in assays. Cells were cultured in T75 flasks (Thermo Scientific) and passaged as required based on confluency.

Dual luciferase assays
Drosophila Kc167 cells from a stock were seeded at around 60% to 70% confluence in T75 flasks the day prior to transfection. A Qiagen Effectene Transfection Reagent kit was used as per the kit protocol, scaled to treat a T75 flask as equivalent to a 75 mm dish, with each flask receiving 225 μl of EC buffer, 12 μl of enhancer, 45 μl of Effectene, and a total of 1.5 μg of plasmid DNA-375 ng Renilla luciferase plasmid, 750 ng 6x2xDraf firefly luciferase plasmid, 225 ng Upd plasmid, 150 ng pAc5.1.
Buffer, enhancer, and pDNA were combined and incubated at RT for 5 min, followed by addition of Effectene and incubated at RT for 8 min. This mixture was then made up to 1.5 ml with fresh cell culture medium without Pen-Strep. T75 flask media was replaced with 7 ml fresh medium (without Pen-Strep) and the 1.5 ml reaction solution, swirled gently to ensure mixing and incubated at 25 C overnight.
dsRNAs were dispensed into 96-well plates, with dsRNA diluted in 20 μl of nuclease-free water, and six technical replicate wells per combination of dsRNA and concentration. Edge wells were filled with water and left unused in order to guard against plate edge effects.
The day after transfection, the transfection medium was aspirated from the T75 flasks. Cells were resuspended in enough fresh serum-free CCM3 medium with Pen-Strep to provide 40,000 cells per well of a 96-well plate in 100 μl. Cells were dispensed into the dsRNA-containing plates, sealed, centrifuged for 1 min at 2000 rpm to encourage adherence of cells to well bottoms, then incubated at 25 C for 4 days to allow RNAi knockdown of the target luciferase protein to occur.
The dual luciferase assay was performed using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System kit (Promega). 1× passive lysis buffer was prepared from 5× concentrate. The Luciferase Assay Reagent II or LARII (FL reagent), and the Stop&Glo Reagent (RL reagent) were mixed with the buffers provided in the kit and then the solutions diluted 1:2 in MilliQ water. Plates were centrifuged for 2 min at 2000 rpm to ensure adherence of loose cells, then the medium was aspirated, leaving 10 μl of residual medium per well. Twenty microliters 1× passive lysis buffer added per well and plates incubated at RT for 15 min. Hundred microliters of LARII dilution was added to each well and the fluorescence of each well (FL values) was read using a Varioskan Flash plate reader (Thermo Scientific) with a prereading 10 s shake step. Hundred microliters of Stop&Glo dilution was then added to each well, and the plate re-read with the filter applied (RL values). FL values were normalized to RL values for each well, and then FL/RL values for wells containing dsRNA were further normalized to the mean FL/RL value of wells containing no dsRNA.
Unpaired t test analysis of luciferase assay data was performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc). Dose curves and IC50 values were generated by nonlinear regression analysis using a dose-response inhibition variable slope curve, also using Graphpad Prism software.
Insect culture SGSB were reared on runner beans at 26 C with 50% relative humidity on a light:dark regimen of 16 h:8 h. WCR were reared in trays containing corn plants at 26 C with 65% relative humidity on a light:dark regimen of 16 h:8 h.

Stink bug injection assays
N2 nymph stage SGSB were fixed to microscope slides with their undersides exposed using double sided tape, injected in the abdomen, and then liberated again using cooking oil. Insects were transferred to a sealed dish containing a single runner bean, with one dish per condition. The injection day was designated day 0; on day 1, all deceased insects were removed and the initial scoring done. It was assumed all mortality in the first day was the result of damage incurred during injection and not from RNAi. Mortality was scored over subsequent days and recorded.
The first injection assay (Fig. 6A) used an Eppendorf EDOS 5222 injector and solutions of dsRNA at concentrations of 700 ng/μl. With this system, the injection volume was variable depending on insect size. The second injection assay (Fig. 6B) used a Drummond Nanoject III Programmable Nanoliter Injector to deliver a fixed dose of 10 nl of a 1 μg/μl dsRNA solution per insect.
WCR diet plate feeding assay WCR larvae were fed on artificial diet for the duration of the assay, with 500 μl of diet set in the bottom of each well of a 48-well plate. Aqueous dsRNA solutions prepared using Mil-liQ water and purified and annealed dsRNAs in 1× PBS were applied to the diet surface and plates dried in a lamina flow hood. Approximately two larvae were seeded per well and the plate sealed, with air holes in the film to allow air exchange with the wells. Initial mortality was scored at the end of day 0. Mortality was scored each subsequent day for 7 days and normalized to the survival of the first day in order to negate most of the non-RNAi mortality associated with mishandling of rootworms during plate seeding. Each experiment included control plates containing no dsRNA and GFP dsRNA. Further individual control experiments included plates containing chemically modified GFP dsRNA and a scrambled dsRNA. Half a plate was treated with each combination of dsRNA type and dsRNA concentration, resulting in approximately 48 larvae in 24 wells per condition.

WCR soil feeding assay
For each dsRNA, two wells of a 48-well plate were dedicated. Plates were set up in duplicate for each dsRNA to give two time points, with one set of plates having corn rootworm larvae applied on day 0 (week 0), another set of plates had larvae applied on day 7 (week 1). Each plate had two wells, each containing a base layer of 300 μl of agar with 370 mg of Stein soil (live defined soil comprising a third each clay, silt, and sand), on top to which was applied 50 μl of dsRNA solution containing the appropriate dose of dsRNA (15, 5, 1.7, and 0.6 μg per well). Control plates with 15 μg of GFP dsRNA and a water-only dsRNA-free negative control were also set up.
About 130 L1 larvae were applied to each of the two wells for a total of 260 insects per combination of dsRNA, concentration, and time point. The week 1 plates were incubated in WCR rearing conditions from day 0 onward along with the day 0 plates. After the application of insects to each plate at each of the time points, insects were left in the soil for 24 h, then extracted from the soil, and live larvae transferred into 48-well diet plates as used for the corn rootworm diet plate feeding assay with two to four larvae dispensed into each well. After each day, where insects were transferred (days 1 and 8), mortality was scored over subsequent days for 7 days. Survival data for each time point was normalized to the number of surviving larvae upon transfer from soil to diet plates (days 1 and 8).
WCR diet plate and soil feeding assays data analysis Statistical significance was assessed using a Chi-square test of independence. Tests were performed using percentages to avoid false significance where there was a large difference in total (live + dead) n numbers between the two groups being compared, though corroborated by tests using raw n numbers of alive/dead insects. Where available, the total n numbers and the average percentage survival of two replicates were used.

Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.
Supporting information-This article contains supporting information.