{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026234567901234566, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.842342342342342, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On Abstract Machine Semantics for Proto-Quipper-M

Quipper is a domain-specific programming language for the description of quantum circuits. Because it is implemented as an embedded language in Haskell, Quipper is a very practical functional language. However, for the same reason, it lacks a formal semantics and it is limited by Haskell's type system. In particular, because Haskell lacks linear types, it is easy to write Quipper programs that violate the non-cloning property of quantum states. In order to formalize relevant fragments of Quipper in a type-safe way, the Proto-Quipper family of research languages has been introduced over the last years. In this paper we first review Proto-Quipper-M, an instance of the Proto-Quipper family based on a categorical model for quantum circuits, which features a linear type system that guarantees that the non-cloning property holds at compile time. We then derive a tentative small-step operational semantics from the big-step semantics of Proto-Quipper-M and we prove that the two are equivalent. After proving subject reduction and progress results for the tentative semantics, we build upon it to obtain a truly small-step semantics in the style of an abstract machine, which we eventually prove to be equivalent to the original semantics.