{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01875532821824382, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005967604433077579, 'mean_word_length': 5.02051282051282, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical evaluation of urothelial tumors of the renal pelvis and ureter based on a new classification system

Clinical evaluation of 460 cases of urothelial tumors of the renal pelvis and ureter was performed using a new clinical classification system, since no systemic clinical classification such as the TNM system for bladder tumors has been available to date. ABC, and TS and TE categories were newly adopted. The former distinguishes tumor multicentricity, and the latter indicates the clinical tumor stage. Tumors arising in one organ and homolaterally are categorized as A, while those in both organs (ureter and renal pelvis) and/or in the bladder are B, and bilateral tumors are C. TS represents the tumors of pT1 and pT2, and TE represents pT3, and pT4. Tumors belonging to pB showed a poorer prognosis than pA tumors. The TS and TE staging system clearly reflected the histopathologic stage, and produced significant differences in relative survival rates. Regarding various prognostic factors, our series gave the same results as reported by other investigators. However, it should be stressed that female patients showed a poorer prognosis than male patients.