{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030658591975775928, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029901589704769114, 'mean_word_length': 4.873333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Rituximab for the treatment of membranous nephropathy: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND
Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy with rituximab was introduced more than a decade ago following experimental data that suggested involvement of B-cell-mediated reactions in its pathogenesis. It was a logical step towards a more selective therapy with less severe side effects as compared to the recommended first-line immunosuppressive therapy with corticosteroids and different immunosuppressant drugs.


METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the anonymous data of patients who were treated with rituximab for idiopathic membranous nephropathy at our institution from January 2006 to July 2016. Daily proteinuria and serum creatinine were analyzed 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after rituximab application. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to proteinuria. We separately analyzed remission rates in the whole group and in groups with different quantity of daily proteinuria. Other history data and laboratory parameters were also compared within different groups of patients.


RESULTS
The study involved 29 rituximab treatments in 26 patients: 7 (26.9%) female and 19 (73.1%) male patients. In 16 out of 29 treatment cases (55.1%), patients had been previously treated with cyclophosphamide and steroids, or cyclosporine with low dose of steroids, or both. In 72.4% of patients, antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibodies were present. In 2 cases of treatment (6.9%), patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 of body surface area in 3 and 4 weekly doses, respectively. In all other cases, repeated rituximab applications were given as needed according to the levels of circulating CD-20 B-cells. The total remission rate in our cohort of patients was 37.9% (11 out of 29 cases). The average serum creatinine in the group of patients who achieved remission was significantly lower than in the group without remission (86.5 vs. 155.5 µmol/L, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the duration of the disease prior to treatment with rituximab between the groups (53.6 and 56.4 months, respectively). The remission rate was highest in the group with daily proteinuria less than 4 g per day (83.3%). There were no remissions in the group of patients with daily proteinuria more than 12 g per day.


CONCLUSION
The remission rate after rituximab treatment in our cohort of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy was lower than in other studies. The reason for this is possibly the application of a single dose of rituximab in the majority of patients, which might have been insufficient in patients with higher proteinuria. .