{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013761467889908258, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.448275862068965, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Management of maxillary midline diastema with emphasis on etiology.

The importance of the presence of a maxillary midline diastema resides in its position and the concern it causes to patients. This specific diastema has been attributed to genetic and environmental factors, even though it is often a normal feature of growth, especially in primary and mixed dentition. The need for treatment is mainly attributed to esthetic and psychological reasons, rather than functional ones. Although it is often the case, treatment plans should not be selected empirically but rather should be based on adequate scientific documentation. Possible therapeutic approaches include orthodontics, restorative dentistry, surgery and various combinations of the above. The ideal treatment should seek to manage not only the diastema in question but also the cause behind it. Irrespective of the treatment alternative selected, permanent retention of stable results should be considered as a treatment objective. The aim of this paper is to underscore the main etiological factors for the presence of a maxillary midline diastema and to illustrate the clinical and laboratory examinations required to recognize these factors. Furthermore, alternative treatment options are discussed depending on the etiology of the problem.