{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018158236057068743, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018158236057068743, 'mean_word_length': 4.514285714285714, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The triumph of age: science, gerontology, and ageism.

It might be said of old age and survival after William Butler Yeats: "Bred to a harder thing than triumph." When I joined the National Institute of Mental Health as a research associate in 1955 there was not much to the aging research scene. The Gerontological Society of America had been founded only 10 years before. The first White House Conference on Aging was six years away. It would be 10 years before the Administration on Aging would be established by law to develop services for the elderly. It would be 19 years before Congress would create an Institute on Aging. In 1955 federal biomedical and behavioral research on aging focused in two places at the National Institutes of Health, of which the National