{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023076923076923078, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011538461538461539, 'mean_word_length': 5.389473684210526, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Suppression of tumorigenicity in hybrids of tumorigenic Chinese hamster cells and diploid mouse fibroblasts: dependence on the presence of at least three different mouse chromosomes and independence of hamster genome dosage.

Somatic cell hybrids were generated between Chinese hamster cell lines (Cl-4 and TK 17-O) with a near-diploid number of partially abnormal chromosomes and embryonic mouse fibroblasts (BALB/c). Hybrids harboring a near-diploid, near-triploid, and near-tetraploid set of hamster chromosomes plus 22 to 30 mouse chromosomes were analyzed for the expression of the transformed or tumorigenic phenotype, respectively, indicated by their capacity to form colonies in soft agar and by tumor formation after s.c. injection into nude mice. The hybrids showed (partial) suppression of tumorigenicity and of anchorage independence. The minimum number of hybrid cells required to initiate tumor growth in nude mice was 100- to 50,000-fold higher, and the latency period was 3- to 6-fold longer in comparison with the highly tumorigenic parental hamster cells. Suppression of tumorigenicity was also found in intraspecific Chinese hamster hybrids involving tumorigenic cells (E 36-O and TK 17-O) and embryonic hamster fibroblasts. To identify those mouse chromosomes associated with suppression of tumorigenicity, we investigated the expression of mouse isozyme genes and the presence of mouse chromosomes in interspecific suppressed hybrids and their tumorigenic hybrids described previously. No single mouse chromosome, even if present in two copies, and no combination of two different mouse chromosomes was sufficient to suppress tumorigenicity in these hybrids. This conclusion is based on either the presence of these chromosomes in hybrids isolated from tumors or their absence in suppressed hybrids.