{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02054794520547945, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.428571428571429, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Paradigm or paradigms in current clinical psychoanalysis].

Since the creation of the psychoanalytical paradigm, at the very peak of positivism, there have been different contributions to this theory. Some of them were accepted and some were rejected for their inconsistency with the prevailing ideas of the time. This continues until the cultural/philosophical changes generate the appropriate setting for the paradigmatic deconstruction/ modification. The constructivist school of thought is an example of this, since it allowed for a new approach to our psychoanalytical practice.