{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.035037878787878785, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04261363636363636, 'mean_word_length': 5.109826589595376, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Correction for Anreiter et al., Epigenetic mechanisms modulate differences in Drosophila foraging behavior

GENETICS Correction for “Epigenetic mechanisms modulate differences in Drosophila foraging behavior,” by Ina Anreiter, Jamie M. Kramer, and Marla B. Sokolowski, which was first published October 16, 2017; 10.1073/pnas.1710770114 (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114: 12518–12523). The authors wish to note the following: “We have found an error in Fig. 2D in our article, which shows incorrect information for pr4 gene expression in whole adult flies. The corrected material for Fig. 2D shows a lack of significant differences in pr4 expression in 24-h food-deprived whole flies. However, this does not change the conclusions of the manuscript because the significant differences originally reported between rovers and sitters on aG9aWT background in whole flies remain in dissected brains and ovaries (Fig. 4) and these significant differences in expression disappear in the G9a null background.” The corrected Fig. 2 and its corrected legend appear below.