{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030941408821593155, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010862409479921, 'mean_word_length': 5.33125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Job Tasks as Determinants of Thoracic Aerosol Exposure in the Cement Production Industry

Background
The aims of this study were to identify important determinants and investigate the variance components of thoracic aerosol exposure for the workers in the production departments of European cement plants.


Methods
Personal thoracic aerosol measurements and questionnaire information (Notø et al., 2015) were the basis for this study. Determinants categorized in three levels were selected to describe the exposure relationships separately for the job types production, cleaning, maintenance, foreman, administration, laboratory, and other jobs by linear mixed models. The influence of plant and job determinants on variance components were explored separately and also combined in full models (plant&job) against models with no determinants (null). The best mixed models (best) describing the exposure for each job type were selected by the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1974) after running all possible combination of the determinants.


Results
Tasks that significantly increased the thoracic aerosol exposure above the mean level for production workers were: packing and shipping, raw meal, cement and filter cleaning, and de-clogging of the cyclones. For maintenance workers, time spent with welding and dismantling before repair work increased the exposure while time with electrical maintenance and oiling decreased the exposure. Administration work decreased the exposure among foremen. A subjective tidiness factor scored by the research team explained up to a 3-fold (cleaners) variation in thoracic aerosol levels. Within-worker (WW) variance contained a major part of the total variance (35-58%) for all job types. Job determinants had little influence on the WW variance (0-4% reduction), some influence on the between-plant (BP) variance (from 5% to 39% reduction for production, maintenance, and other jobs respectively but an 79% increase for foremen) and a substantial influence on the between-worker within-plant variance (30-96% for production, foremen, and other workers). Plant determinants had little influence on the WW variance (0-2% reduction), some influence on the between-worker variance (0-1% reduction and 8% increase), and considerable influence on the BP variance (36-58% reduction) compared to the null models.


Conclusion
Some job tasks contribute to low levels of thoracic aerosol exposure and others to higher exposure among cement plant workers. Thus, job task may predict exposure in this industry. Dust control measures in the packing and shipping departments and in the areas of raw meal and cement handling could contribute substantially to reduce the exposure levels. Rotation between low and higher exposed tasks may contribute to equalize the exposure levels between high and low exposed workers as a temporary solution before more permanent dust reduction measures is implemented. A tidy plant may reduce the overall exposure for almost all workers no matter of job type.