{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01059001512859304, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.6581196581196584, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
What makes a good researcher ?

In this paper we investigate the characteristics of a good researcher and contrast them with that of other researchers which would give further insights into how to become a good researcher. For this we analyze the collaboration and citation pattern of an author. Furthermore, we propose a new metric which takes into account just the local characteristics of an author and show how well it performs with respect to a global metric like pageRank in determining the goodness of an author. For our experiments, we use the DBLP citation data which has more than four hundred and fifty thousand papers and close to a million authors.