{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012295081967213115, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004918032786885246, 'mean_word_length': 5.672131147540983, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Optimizing capillary column backflush to improve cycle time and reduce column contamination.

Interest in decreasing cycle times in capillary GC analyses has driven much of the instrumental developments of the last decade. Recent developments in GC instrumentation now make it reasonable to consider backflushing capillary columns on a routine basis. Significant reduction in analysis and total cycle times (typically 15-50% depending on the application) are readily achieved for analyses that currently require an extended temperature program and bakeout period to remove retained sample components and column contaminants. Setup and optimization of backflush conditions are relatively straight forward as long as some basic concepts are well understood. The parameters affecting capillary column backflushing are described. Examples are shown that help visualize what happens during backflush. The relationship between oven ramp rate and flow turns out to be an important variable that dictates minimum backflush times in temperature programmed CGC. Backflush times corresponding to 2-5 void volumes in the reversed direction are usually sufficient for backflushing, if performed after each temperature programmed run.