{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023557126030624265, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.391304347826087, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Legal systems’ responses to medical malpractice

therapy are likely multiple, such as: clinician preference, patient pressure, medico legal concerns, complacency, tiredness, ignorance, indifference as well as healthcare system-related factors, such as time pressures. This, in conjunction with the tight restriction on the prescription of other antibiotic classes, is almost certainly influencing prescribing trends. Whatever the underlying reasons, a significant number of prescriptions remained unjustifiable and were not reviewed when therapy could be refined. Whilst these findings have led to targeting the prescribing of piperacillin/tazobactam through education, further analysis of prescribing behaviour along with continued active antimicrobial stewardship practice is indicated to inform future intervention and improve prescribing habits.