{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020618556701030927, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.0606060606060606, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A metacognitive regulation approach for judgment of satiation

Previous research has documented expected satieties and some methods quantifying them for various foods. However, it seems both metacognition and eating behaviour literatures neglected a possible metacognitive judgment in eating behaviour: “judgment of satiation” (JOS) which allows quantifying any concordant and discordant eating patterns (e.g., under- or overeating). Therefore, along with a methodology to study JOS, a working model of metacognitive regulation of eating was proposed based on Nelson and Narens’ metacognitive framework to bridge the gap between metacognition and application of it in this vitally important everyday behaviour. This straightforward understanding of regulation process is expected to piece already-accumulated evidences on satiation together, establish prospective research questions on eating behaviour and appetite control, and clarify specific eating problems further. Overall, both the conceptualisations outlined in the framework and the methodology proposed are expected to facilitate a newer insight for researchers on understanding such a complex behaviour.