{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015306122448979591, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.23015873015873, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Detecting Spoofing Attacks in Speaker Verification Systems

Abstract: The proof of writing tells that they can be powerful, however the issue is as yet present. Because of the chance of parodying assaults at different points the confirmation utilizing biometric has developed astoundingly these years, however they can be helpless against satirizing assaults. In any event, for programmed speaker check, it is difficult to counter the parodying at all focuses. Notwithstanding an extreme climate, the innovation offers great help; more industriousness will be needed in future to set palatable insurance against the assaults. This paper makes accessible a review of work that has been done in the space of ridiculing assaults and its answer for speaker check throughout the long term.