{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014534883720930232, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.741666666666666, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Some Observations concerning Comments on Biblical Words in Sermons

Last time Mr. Daines wrote for us he warned us against the overfacile pressing of a biblical analogy beyond the intention of the biblical writer. In this paper he warns us against playing games with biblical words. To emphasize the interrelation of the English terms holiness, wholeness and health can make a popular and effective homiletic point, but one which must be renounced by the expository preacher. The implications of semantics for biblical study have been set forth at a high academic level by such writers as Professor Barr and Dr. Thiselton, but Mr. Daines applies them to the work of general practitioners.