{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023297491039426525, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004480286738351254, 'mean_word_length': 5.5321637426900585, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Same-Sex Behavior of Heterosexual Men: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

In terms of human sexuality, there are many studies on same-sex behavior and opposite-sex behavior, but both-sex behavior is vastly overlooked. Such bisexual invisibility may be due to the fact that bisexuality does not follow a universal behavioral pattern, which implies that a cross-cultural approach could be very helpful. This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods to investigate 255 behaviorally bisexual males of low socioeconomic status from three different cultures: Brazil, Turkey, and Thailand. Brazilian heterosexuals were less likely than their Thai or Turk counterparts to engage in homosexual activities. Answers to interview data tested popular ideas, but neither of these arguments could account for the difference between Brazil and the other two cultures. Only the argument that homosexual relationships reflect a need to exercise personal dominance (childhood bullying behavior) accounted for (1) the homosexual activities of heterosexual men and (2) the cultural differences between countries found in this study.