{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01805869074492099, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0030097817908201654, 'mean_word_length': 5.487804878048781, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Do We Need Formal Education in Visualization?

The following three reasons are sufficient to answer this question in the affirmative: careless mapping from data to pictures may lead to erroneous interpretation; a substantial amount of knowledge is necessary to generate images depicting complex information in a way that prevents erroneous interpretation; and decision making is increasingly based on visual representations. The organization and content of the core topics of visualization were finalized at a 1997 workshop at the Colorado School of Mines. These comprise the following eight themes: introduction to visualization; the data; the user and the task; mapping process; the representations; interaction issues; concepts of the visualization process; and systems and tools. The needs of educators and students vary too widely to bring one curriculum into focus. Instead, the eight themes recommended can be expanded into a curriculum, or compressed into several subtopics of a high-performance computing or computer graphics course. The themes can stand as separate modules, taught in a different order from that suggested. While my collaborators and I strongly recommend covering each of the core topics, we also encourage educators to expand individual themes to encompass the particular objectives of their students.