{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010471204188481676, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3076923076923075, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Historical Divergence: Shaping the Petitum in International Commercial Arbitration

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to identify the historical and theoretical divergences between Common Law and Civil Law, as far as the introductory document for commencing arbitration and the filing of claims or counterclaims are concerned. The analysis will be focused on the implementation of this divergence at a transnational level and in a selection of institutional arbitration rules. In the final part of the paper, a compromise for a harmonized procedure will be suggested.