{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04603701945894637, 'fraction_numerical': 0.036070242050308496, 'mean_word_length': 4.954802259887006, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
012The Informant History in the Cognitive Assessment of Older Adults in General Practice

Background: Despite its crucial role in the assessment of patients presenting with a memory problem or concern over cognition [1, 2], the utility, availability and conduct of an informant (or collateral) history in general practice has never been formally assessed. Methods: A survey distributed to three separate and nationally representative cohorts of general practitioners (GPs)/GP trainees, followed by a reminder one month later. Results: Ninety-five (14%; 52.2% male) responded. Nearly all (87%; 83/95) indicate that it is most often a family member whom brings possible cognitive impairment to the attention of the GP. The vast majority obtain an informant history in >90% (72.6%; 69/ 95) or in 75–90% (20%; 19/95) and rate it very useful in their clinical assessment of cognition. The majority report the informant history as readily available and rarely refused, with the general practice environment well-suited to obtaining informant histories. A small minority use the GPCOG informant section to guide the history (3.2%; 3/95). Nearly all (92.6%; 88/95) report having received no training in obtaining informant histories with most (79%; 75/95) welcoming of further training in this area. Conclusions: Despite recognition of the utility and importance of a suitable informant history in the assessment of those with a memory problem, the vast majority of GPs report having never received training in obtaining a suitable informant history and do not use structured tools to guide their interview. Further emphasis on the informant history as a distinct clinical entity on medical curricula, as well as increasing emphasis on the ready availability of structured informant tools, is warranted. References 1. Briggs R, O’Neill D. The Informant History: A Neglected Aspect of Clinical Education and Practice. QJM 2016; 109: 301–2. 2. Dyer AH, Nabeel S, Briggs R, O’Neill D, Kennelly SP. Cognitive Assessment of Older Adults at the Acute Care Interface: The Informant History. Postgrad Med J 2016; 92: 255–9.