{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009099181073703366, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003639672429481347, 'mean_word_length': 5.25, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of two different programs of instruction on motor performance of second grade students.

Abstract The problem under investigation in this study was to determine if there was any difference in a structured program of motor skill instruction as compared to a combination of low organization play and movement exploration in the development of motor performance in second grade students. The experimental group was instructed in volleyball and basketball skills for 10 weeks, while the control group was given low organization play and movement exploration. Magnuson's Motor Performance Test for Elementary School Children was used for the pretest and post-test administered to both groups. The findings of this study indicated that within the 10-week period there was a significant difference between the two methods of instruction in the development of motor performance of second grade students. The method of skill instruction used with the experimental group was found to be significantly superior to the method of low organization play and movement exploration given to the control group.