{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04449438202247191, 'fraction_numerical': 0.035955056179775284, 'mean_word_length': 4.951871657754011, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Potential MR Enterography Features to Differentiate Primary Small Intestinal Lymphoma From Crohn Disease.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the MR enterographic features of primary small intestinal lymphoma (PSIL) and compare them with active Crohn disease (CD) presenting with severe (≥ 10 mm) mural thickening of the small bowel. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 15 patients with pathologically proven PSIL and 15 patients with active inflammatory CD with severe mural thickening. Various morphologic, enhancement, and diffusion parameters were compared between the two groups at MR enterography. The ratios of the upstream to involved luminal diameter and mural thickness to luminal diameter in the involved segment were calculated. An attempt was made to define a predictive model (morphologic score) for discriminating PSIL from CD with severe mural thickening. RESULTS. Patients with PSIL were more likely than those with CD to have unifocal disease (66.7% vs 20.0%, p = 0.025), circumferential involvement (86.7% vs 26.7%, p < 0.001), luminal dilatation (60.0% vs 7.0%, p = 0.005), and an attenuated fold pattern (53.3% vs none, p < 0.001). They were less likely to have serosal surface involvement (40.0% vs 100%, p = 0.001) and mesenteric fat infiltration (33.3% vs 100%, p < 0.001). Median upstream to involved luminal diameter ratio (1.5 vs 9.6, p < 0.001) and mural thickness to involved luminal diameter ratio (1.1 vs 4.3, p = 0.044) were significantly lower in patients with PSIL than in those with CD with severe mural thickening. No significant difference was observed in enhancement and diffusion measures. Morphologic score was based on the presence of luminal dilatation, unifocal involvement, mesenteric fat infiltration, and luminal stricture, yielding accuracy of 98% for differentiation between PSIL and CD with severe mural thickening. CONCLUSION. Morphologic features seen at MR enterography rather than enhancement or diffusion parameters may be valuable for differentiation of PSIL from active CD with severe mural thickening with significantly lower ratios of upstream to involved luminal diameter and mural thickness to involved luminal diameter in PSIL.