{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015113350125944584, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.512295081967213, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Interpretation Of The Concept Of Archipolitics In The Context Of Expert Management

The paper discusses the concept of archipolitics, which is interpreted in the context of ideas about the expert management of society as an element of the modern system of political management. It demonstrates the fact that the concept of archipolitics can be interpreted as “politics by experts”, which establishes a special regime – expertocracy – that changes the power/knowledge relations model. The paper finds that the competitive struggle for power between expert communities causes an excess of expert proposals, thus reducing research-based thought, critical analysis and scientific objectivity. It also concludes that an emergency situation demonstrates the limit of expert management, since the only criterion for the effectiveness of emergency management is the speed of response, which requires practical skills of action rather than knowledge. If there is an emergency, the involvement of experts is used to substantiate decisions after they were made thereby legitimizing the actions of the authorities, so the expertise becomes formal and the results are predetermined. It is found that the technologies of power focused on creating a system of “management without managers” turn management into a subjectless process, in which neither the authorities nor experts are responsible for the consequences of decisions made. It is shown that the lack of responsibility of the authorities and expert communities provokes the effect of uncontrollability and unpredictability of social processes.