{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019079685746352413, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.757575757575758, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Coordinating intracellular nickel-metal-site structure-function relationships and the NikR and RcnR repressors.

Metalloregulator function requires both sensitivity and selectivity to ensure metal-specific activity without interfering with intracellular metal trafficking pathways. Here, we examine the role of metal coordination geometry in the function of NikR and RcnR, two widely conserved nickel-responsive regulators that are both present in E. coli. The available data suggest an emerging trend in which coordination number is linked to metal-binding affinity, and thus regulatory function. The differences in coordination geometry also suggest that the kinetic mechanisms of metal-association and dissociation will contribute to metalloregulator function. We also discuss ways in which the ligand binding properties of metalloregulators may be tuned to alter the regulatory response.