{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03686635944700461, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02816180235535074, 'mean_word_length': 4.631123919308357, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
PSI-2 A procedure for urine collection in pre-weaned heifer calves


 Urine collection is a useful tool to analyze intestinal permeability in cattle for research and diagnostic purposes. However, urine sampling techniques often rely on total waste collection, which reduces the ability to perform more frequent sampling and obtain accurate and sterile urine volumes. A potential alternative is urethral catheters, which have been used in cows and weaned heifers. However, urethral catheters have not been thoroughly tested in pre-weaned dairy heifer calves. The study objective was to develop a urethral catheter placement procedure in pre-weaned heifer calves for continuous and accurate urine collection. Fifteen Holstein heifer calves had catheters placed at 8 ± 2 days (37.5 ± 3.38 kg BW) and 40 ± 2 days (59.3 ± 5.38 kg BW) of age. During the procedure, calves were individually housed (1.87 m2/calf) and restrained. The vulva was cleaned using betadine and 70% ethanol and then a sterile, lubricated 8.9 cm speculum was inserted into the vagina. A sterile guidewire (145 cm x 0.89 cm) was inserted into a lubricated sterile 10 FR catheter. The catheter was inserted into the urethral opening (~5–7 cm into vagina), guided into the bladder, and the catheter balloon was filled with water (10 mL). The guide wire was removed, and urine flow confirmed correct placement before a 4 L urinary drainage bag was attached to the catheter. Individual calf health observations were made twice over a 24-hour period and included vaginal discharge, bleeding, redness or inflammation, and tissue discharge in the urine. Occurrence rate was determined using PROC FREQ in SAS 9.4. Regardless of catheterization timing, bleeding and tissue discharge occurred at a rate of 3.33% ± 0.18, and vaginal discharge and inflammation occurred at a rate of 6.70% ± 0.25. In summary, this procedure is a viable method for total urine collection in pre-weaning heifer calves.