{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.065814696485623, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05623003194888179, 'mean_word_length': 4.8, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 6, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Complete transitioning to the radial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a real-world single-center registry of 1808 consecutive patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES
To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of transradial approach (TRA) versus transfemoral approach (TFA) for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) during a complete institutional transition from TFA to TRA.


METHODS AND RESULTS
An all-comer population of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients (n=1808) who underwent PPCI using TRA (n=1162) and TFA (n=646) from October 2007 to December 2010 were enrolled. TRA was used in 25% of PPCIs by 2007 and in 96% of PPCIs in 2010. Primary endpoints were cardiovascular death and major adverse cardiac event (MACE), defined as a composite of death, stroke, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization at 30 days and 1 year. At 30 days, TRA compared to TFA was associated with a significant reduction of cardiovascular mortality (5.2% vs 10.5%; P<.001), significant MACE reduction (7.3% vs 12.5%; P<.001), fewer access-site complications (0.9% vs 8.2%; P<.001), and lower TIMI major bleeding (1.1% vs 4.3%; P<.001). At 1 year, the cardiovascular mortality and MACE rates were also in favor of the TRA group (6.9% vs 11.5%; P<.001 and 11.6% vs 20.1%; P<.001), respectively.


CONCLUSION
Complete transition from femoral access to a preferred radial access is safe and effective for STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, with a favorable effect on short- and long-term outcomes.