{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01820250284414107, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004550625711035267, 'mean_word_length': 5.285714285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Can Argumentation Help AI to Understand Explanation?

Explanation-aware computing needs to supplement the older model that sees an explanation as a chain of inferences with a pragmatic and communicative model that structures an explanation as a dialog exchange. The field of argumentation, originally put forward in linguistics and philosophy, is now seen as providing a core approach that has been widely adopted in artificial intelligence, including multi-agent systems (Dunn and Bench-Capon, 2006). This paper presents an example that shows how the argumentation methodology works on the concept of explanation by transforming an example of an explanation into a formal dialog structure. However, the project of extending argumentation theory to the concept of explanation is still at its very early stages, and some key problems to be solved in future research are indicated.