{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03038674033149171, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0055248618784530384, 'mean_word_length': 5.25, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Intensive post‐polypectomy surveillance: Too much for too little?

The implementation of population-based organized screening programs for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening generated a heavy strain on the limited capacity of endoscopy resources. In several European countries, such programs are based on a biannual invitation of the target population with Immunochemical Faecal Test (FIT), resulting in a 5-7% rate of test positivity at each round. This burden of post-FIT colonoscopy quickly saturated the availability of colonoscopy capacity that were mainly planned over 30 years earlier for clinical - i.e. symptomatic patients - rather than preventive needs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.