{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01756756756756757, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002702702702702703, 'mean_word_length': 5.024390243902439, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Cost effectiveness of integrated internal medicine].

The medical diagnoses and their economic level of severity as well as the treatment costs and the proceeds of an integrated internal - psychosomatic ward C were compared with two conventional internal wards A and B of a general medical department within a hospital of tertiary care level. With a similar economic level of severity of the diagnoses, lethality and costs for nursing care given the medical treatment costs of C were significant lower and the proceeds (minus medical treatment costs and nurses' salaries) calculated according to G-DRG version 1.0 higher than those of A and B. Integrated internal medicine is more cost effective compared to conventional internal medicine.