{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009041591320072333, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.367816091954023, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Raising the Standard

The subject of experimental versus numerical analysis is a debate often encountered in engineering companies and at conferences and seminars. The small extent to which experimental analysis is used in industry is an indicator of how much faith engineers have in the complementary analysis methods such as numerical and analytical techniques. This ‘belief’ in numerical and analytical methods may be driven or even forced by cost constraints or could be the result of conservatism or ignorance of corroborating experimental methods.