{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027279253409906678, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0014357501794687725, 'mean_word_length': 5.060869565217391, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Kissinger study of southern Africa : National security study memorandum 39 (secret)

Arkhurst asserts the importance of Southern Africa for an evaluation of U.S. policy towards the entire continent, and his contributors pick up this theme. They tend to over-emphasise developments in that region, and seem to forget that a part does not make a whole Southern Africa is not Africa. They believe that significant changes can be brought about by removing America's internal racism, and by increasing pressures: on American policymakers by the black community, and on the white minorities in Southern Africa by the United States. By complete way of contrast, Smith advocates a concerted world-wide 'radical confrontation', not precluding armed conflict. His analysis is, basically, a sweeping indictment of American foreign economic relations, particularly with the developing countries, not dissimilar to the indictments of such critics as Lenin, Jack Woodis, and Kwame Nkrumah, to mention only a few who have also sought to denounce and destroy imperialist exploitation. In summation, both books will keep alive discussion on America's world role and the pressures for change. However, neither have added much that is new to our understanding of the dynamics of U.S.-African relations, nor has Smith thrown any new light on Marxist theory as applied to the analysis of the African situation.