{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0225140712945591, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0075046904315197, 'mean_word_length': 5.427710843373494, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: In Search of the Nonprofit Sector

domains. This leads to the expectation that the higher the amount of private funding in a certain domain, the larger the influence of the patrons. Conflicts of interest in the field of medical research have been investigated in the past decade by Stelfox, Chua, O’Rourke, and Detsky (1998). They investigated physicians’ financial relationships with the pharmaceutical industry and their published positions on the safety of calcium-channel antagonists. The results of Stelfox et al. (1998) show that researchers who supported the use of calciumchannel antagonists were significantly more likely than neutral or critical researchers to have financial relationships with manufacturers of these compounds. In sum, Adam’s book treats the history of philanthropy while discussing issues that are still relevant in the contemporary study of philanthropy. Philanthropy, Patronage, and Civil Society offers an interesting account of these developments that should be interesting to students of history and other fields alike.