{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020050125313283207, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018170426065162906, 'mean_word_length': 5.362549800796812, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Predictive Value of Electrodiagnostic Studies in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

&NA; In recent years, electrodiagnostic studies have become an expected component in the work up and evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. We conducted a retrospective review of 460 carpal tunnel decompressions to determine whether the accuracy of diagnosis and the prediction of therapeutic outcome could be related to the positivity and severity of findings on preoperative electrical studies. The 349 patients (460 hands) were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of hands with the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome but with normal electrodiagnostic studies (n = 62); in group 2 the hands had a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome with confirmatory electrodiagnostic studies (n = 398). The number and distribution of signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome were not statistically different between these two groups. There was not a statistically significant difference in the success rate of surgery or the incidence of complications. The similarities between these two groups suggests that the distinction between them (the positivity of electrodiagnostic studies) is an artificial one and that the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is sufficient to predict the presence of the disease, as well as outcome of surgery. On the basis of these data, strict adherence to electrodiagnostic studies to confirm the diagnosis will exclude 13 percent of the patients with legitimate carpal tunnel syndrome from receiving appropriate therapy. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100: 1452, 1997.)