{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016359918200409, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.312903225806451, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Integration of Stereo, Texture, and Outline Cues during Pinhole Viewing of Real Ridge-Shaped Objects and Stereograms of Ridges

Three experiments are reported in which the possible role of blur cues as a factor needing to be taken into account in cue-integration studies involving conflicts between stereo and texture/outline cues was investigated. The earlier suggestion was tested that uncontrolled blur cues might have caused the quite different patterns of cue integration reported for real ridge-shaped objects oriented vertically and for stereograms depicting similar surfaces. Blur cues were manipulated by pinhole viewing intended to render accommodation open loop. The results for real ridges were as predicted by the blur-cue hypothesis: pinhole viewing strengthened texture/outline cues in vertically oriented ridges, thereby diminishing the pattern of stereo dominance hitherto observed for these stimuli (and as observed here in non-pinhole-viewing control conditions and in horizontally oriented ridges). The results for the stereograms did not conform to predictions: pinhole viewing, assumed to remove blur cues from the cue-integration process, still produced the pattern observed in control conditions in which a texture/outline cue for a shallow ridge overwhelmed stereo cues for a steep ridge. This result is against the hypothesis that perhaps blur cues for the stereogram projection surface differentially favoured the shallow texture/outline cues. A new variant of the blur-cue hypothesis is offered to account for this result. The main conclusion from the study is: beware drawing firm conclusions from stereograms about the pattern of cue integration that can be expected when real objects are being viewed. The two situations can produce very different results as far as cue integration is concerned. This is a conclusion with serious implications for the use of stereograms for studying the integration of stereo with other cues.