{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015920398009950248, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.2875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Direct and indirect restorative materials.

BACKGROUND
In recent years, dentistry has benefited from a marked increase in the development of esthetic materials, including ceramic and plastic compounds. But the advent of these new materials has not eliminated the usefulness of more traditional restorative materials such as gold, base metal alloys and dental amalgam.


OVERVIEW
This report outlines important features of direct and indirect restoratives, with an emphasis on the safety and efficacy of each material.


CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
This article was developed to help dentists explain to their patients the relative pros and cons of various materials used in dental restorations, which include fillings, crowns, bridges and inlays. The weight of the scientific evidence indicates that all of these materials are safe and effective for their intended use. Patients, in consultation with their dentists, are free to choose the most appropriate among them for their particular needs.