{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.045731031595537715, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0402639938926786, 'mean_word_length': 4.461735036987222, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
FMRP(1–297)-tat restores ion channel and synaptic function in a model of Fragile X syndrome

Fragile X Syndrome results from a loss of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP). We now show that FMRP is a member of a Cav3-Kv4 ion channel complex that is known to regulate A-type potassium current in cerebellar granule cells to produce mossy fiber LTP. Mossy fiber LTP is absent in Fmr1 knockout (KO) mice but is restored by FMRP(1-297)-tat peptide. This peptide further rapidly permeates the blood-brain barrier to enter cells across the cerebellar-cortical axis that restores the balance of protein translation for at least 24 h and transiently reduces elevated levels of activity of adult Fmr1 KO mice in the Open Field Test. These data reveal that FMRP(1-297)-tat can improve function from the levels of protein translation to synaptic efficacy and behaviour in a model of Fragile X syndrome, identifying a potential therapeutic strategy for this genetic disorder.

T he loss of Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) in Fragile X syndrome (FXS) can interfere with the translation of numerous proteins important for the normal development of synaptic transmission. A growing body of evidence suggests that behavioral disorders in FXS can involve a disruption in the processing of sensory information in both cortex and cerebellum [1][2][3] . The mossy fiber projection to cerebellar granule cells represents a major synaptic portal to the cerebellar cortex where long-term plasticity can shape sensory input [4][5][6][7] . Any dysfunction at this synapse will thus impair signal processing by the cerebellar cortex at the first stage of sensory input.
Cerebellar granule cells express a Cav3-Kv4 ion channel complex that contributes to long-term potentiation (LTP) of mossy fiber input by increasing the intrinsic excitability of granule cells in the vermal region of lobule 9 8,9 . FMRP is widely expressed in cerebellum and can modulate the activity of ion channels in the membrane, including Kv4 potassium channels [10][11][12][13][14] . Given the central role of Kv4 channels in mossy fiber LTP we investigated the potential for FMRP to shape long-term changes in granule cell excitability.
The present study shows that FMRP is a constituent member of the Cav3-Kv4 complex that modulates both Cav3 and Kv4 channels to reduce Kv4 current amplitude. LTP at the mossy fiber-granule cell input is absent in Fmr1 knockout (KO) mice but rescued by infusing an N-terminal fragment of FMRP (FMRP (1-297)) into granule cells. Moreover, a FMRP(1-297)-tat peptide introduced to Fmr1 KO mice by tail vein injection restores Cav3-Kv4 complex function and mossy fiber LTP, reduces the level of activity in adult animals within 1 h, and rescues disrupted translation of select proteins associated with FXS for at least 24 h, supporting the potential for a tat-FMRP conjugate approach to be developed as a therapeutic agent for FXS.

Results
FMRP restores mossy fiber LTP in Fmr1 KO mice. The reduction in A-type current in granule cells following a theta burst stimulus (TBS) to mossy fibers was traced to a hyperpolarizing shift in the half voltage for Kv4 channel inactivation (Vh) (referred to here as a left-shift in Kv4 Vh) 8 . To determine the potential role for FMRP in regulating Kv4 channels and LTP in granule cells, whole-cell recordings were obtained in the vermis region of lobule 9 from male P16-P22 wild-type (WT) mice or Fmr1 KO mice and mossy fibers were stimulated to evoke a just threshold excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) (Fig. 1a). In 6/6 cells of WT mice a TBS was followed by an initial peak increase in EPSP amplitude that then decreased to an elevated level of 138.8 ± 11.0% (n = 6; p = 0.012) of control 5-13 min post TBS (Fig. 1a). In WT cells just subthreshold synaptic stimulation was associated with little firing probability, but TBS invoked an increase in firing probability to single pulse synaptic stimuli that persisted for at least 10 min post stimulation ( Fig. 1a) 8,15 .
Recordings from granule cells in Fmr1 KO mice revealed similar resting membrane potentials, input resistance and firing threshold as WT mice (Supplementary Table 1). Thus, the loss of FMRP in Fmr1 KO animals did not noticeably influence the basic properties of membrane excitability in granule cells. Yet, in contrast to WT animals, delivering a TBS stimulus to mossy fibers in Fmr1 KO mice failed to evoke LTP of either EPSP amplitude or spike firing probability (Fig. 1b). Previous work has shown that an N-terminal fragment of FMRP (FMRP(1-297)) can modulate select potassium channels 11,[16][17][18] . To test if FMRP  could restore plasticity at the mossy fiber-granule cell synapse we included 3 nM FMRP  in the recording electrode. After 10 min equilibration of FMRP(1-297) EPSP amplitude exhibited no significant difference from control 10-15 min post TBS (103.6 ± 10.3%, n = 7, p = 0.74) (Fig. 1c). However, TBS now evoked a substantial increase in the firing probability that persisted 10-15 min post TBS (Fig. 1c).
We then tested for any effects of FMRP(1-297) on isolated Kv4 current (see "Methods") 8 . In these recordings postsynaptic calcium currents were not blocked, allowing calcium entering via Cav3 channels to interact with the Kv4-KChIP3 complex 8,9,19 . In WT mice mossy fiber TBS evoked a significant leftshift in Kv4 Vh or the half voltage for Kv4 activation (Va) (Fig. 1d). The net effect of these changes on Vh and Va was to produce a 44.2 ± 11.1% (n = 7, p = 0.011) reduction in Kv4 current post TBS, indicating a more prominent role of the leftshift in Kv4 Vh on current amplitude (Fig. 1d). Repeating these tests in Fmr1 KO mice revealed no significant difference in the resting values for Vh or Va compared to WT mice (Fig. 1e). However, TBS failed to evoke a left-shift in either Kv4 Vh or Va, and no change in Kv4 current amplitude in Fmr1 KO mice (107 ± 7% of control, p = 0.40) (Fig. 1e).
We then tested if FMRP(1-297) could restore the TBS-induced left-shift in Kv4 properties associated with LTP. Including 3 nM FMRP  in the electrode (Fig. 1f) did not affect the initial control Vh or Va compared to either WT mice (cf Fig. 1d) (Vh, p = 0.51; Va, p = 0.77) or Fmr1 KO mice recorded with normal electrolyte (Vh, p = 0.57; Va, p = 0.95) (Fig. 1e). However, TBS in Fmr1 KO cells pre-infused with FMRP(1-297) induced a significant left-shift in Kv4 Vh and Va to reduce Kv4 current by 34 ± 12% (n = 6, p = 0.044) (Fig. 1f). We found that in tissue slices preincubated for 2 h and recorded in the presence of 20 µM anisomycin to block protein synthesis mossy fiber TBS still evoked a leftward shift in Kv4 Vh and Va in granule cells of either WT mice or Fmr1 KO mice recorded with 3 nM FMRP  in the electrode, indicating no requirement for protein translation for these effects ( Supplementary Fig. 1).
These results indicate that reintroducing FMRP(1-297) restores the capacity of mossy fiber TBS to evoke a left-shift in Kv4 Vh and Va, and a long-term increase in the probability of spike firing that is absent in Fmr1 KO animals.
FMRP associates with Cav3.1 and Kv4.3 channels. To define the association between FMRP and each of Cav3 calcium and Kv4 potassium channels we conducted protein biochemical and imaging assays. Tests on homogenates of WT whole brain (P30-P40) revealed co-immunoprecipitation (coIP) of both Cav3.1 and Kv4.3 channels with FMRP using Cav3.1 and Kv4.3 antibodies to immunoprecipitate (IP) and an N-terminus FMRP antibody to immunoblot (Fig. 2a). The reverse coIP could not be completed as the available N-terminus FMRP antibodies did not function well for IP.
We also tested for fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) by preparing constructs with a fluorescent tag on the Ntermini of Cav3.1 and Kv4.3, and on the C-terminus of FMRP or the C-terminal end of FMRP(1-297). Coexpressing a GFP-Cav3.1 construct with FMRP-mKate as donor-acceptor pairs in tsA-201 cells revealed FRET upon excitation at 457 nm (Fig. 2b, c). Similarly, coexpressing GFP-Kv4.3 and FMRP-mKate evoked FRET with 457 nm activation (Fig. 2d, e). Moreover, companion tests confirmed FRET when either GFP-Cav3.1 or GFP-Kv4.3 was coexpressed with a FMRP(1-297)-mKate construct (Supplementary Fig. 2). The specificity of FRET was confirmed by a lack of FRET in cells that expressed either GFP-Cav3.1 or GFP-Kv4.3 together with mKate alone or cells that coexpressed GFP alone with FMRP-mKate or FMRP(1-297)-mKate ( Supplementary  Fig. 3). These data reveal that FMRP or FMRP(1-297) can associate with Cav3.1 or Kv4.3 with a proximity of less than 10 nm separation when coexpressed in tsA-201 cells, a result a-c Plots of the mean amplitude of the mossy fiber-evoked EPSP and probability of firing per stimulus in whole-cell recordings of lobule 9 granule cells. EPSP amplitudes were only calculated for stimuli that were subthreshold to spike discharge and probability of spike firing was averaged for every 1-min interval (6 stimuli). a, b Theta burst stimulation (TBS, indicated by arrow) of mossy fiber input evokes LTP of the EPSP and an increase in probability of firing in granule cells of WT mice (a) (% change of EPSP: 138.8 ± 11.0%; firing probability: resting condition 0.5 ± 0.5%, after TBS 25.0 ± 11.4%, n = 6 cells from 6 mice) but not Fmr1 KO mice (b) (% change of EPSP: 100.6 ± 5.2%; firing probability: resting condition 1.4 ± 1.5%, after TBS 0.5 ± 0.6%, n = 7 cells from 7 mice   in the internal solution also produced a significant left-shift in Kv4 Vh (p = 0.037, two-sample Student's t test) and a reduction of Kv4 current amplitude, but no corresponding shift in Va (Control Va, −24.0 ± 3.2 mV, n = 10; Test Va, −22.6 ± 3.6 mV, n = 10; p = 0.78, two-sample Student's t test) (Fig. 3c). The effects of infusing 30 nM FMRP(1-297) through the electrode (Fig. 3c) did not involve a change in channel insertion in the membrane given no significant change in current density (pA/pF) when tested from −110 to +60 mV ( Supplementary Fig. 4).
Previous work established that Kv4 Vh can be left-shifted by any decrease in Cav3 channel calcium conductance 9,20 . The ability for FMRP  to left shift the Vh of Cav3.1 recorded in tsA-201 cells might then account for the shift in granule cell Kv4 Vh when this protein is infused. We attempted to record Cav3 current in granule cells of WT and Fmr1 KO mice but its amplitude in mouse cerebellum was too small to reliably measure. Instead we compared Kv4 Vh in granule cells of Fmr1 KO mice in the presence of TTA-P2 (1 µM) to block Cav3 current to that of a second set of cells recorded with FMRP(1-297) in the electrode. The cells infused with FMRP  in the presence of TTA-P2 exhibited a significant left-shift in Kv4 Vh from a mean value of −74 to −78 mV (Fig. 3d). This is important in indicating that a WT brain 75 IP : C a v 3 .  FMRP(1-297) can exert at least some of its effects independently of Cav3.1 calcium conductance on one or more subunits of the Cav3-Kv4 complex.
Together these data indicate that FMRP(1-297) can form very close associations with Cav3.1 and Kv4.3 channel subunits both in tsA-201 cells and in situ, with significant biophysical effects by reducing their availability near resting potential. Despite the rapid effects of FMRP(1-297) infusion on Cav3.1 and Kv4.3 channel Vh (within 10 min) we can not yet attribute these actions to direct interactions between FMRP(1-297) and the channel subunits, as additional accessory proteins such as KChIP3 and DPP that associate with the Kv4 complex could also be involved 19 .
FMRP(1-297)-tat rapidly crosses the BBB. The fact that FXS stems from the loss of a single protein raises the possibility that reintroducing FMRP would offset the primary factor underlying this genetic disorder. One strategy would be to use a cell penetrating peptide to facilitate passage across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and cell membranes. For this we prepared a tat peptide conjugated to FMRP(1-297) that also included an HA tag for immunocytochemical tests (Fig. 4a). The final FMRP(1-297)-tat protein was ∼35-37 kDa, a size that is within the range for high efficiency transport across the BBB 21 . We validated this construct by testing its effects on whole-cell recordings of Kv4 Vh in granule cells of Fmr1 KO mice, and found that bath application of even 10 nM FMRP(1-297)-tat significantly left-shifted Kv4 Vh (Fmr1 KO control Kv4 Vh, −71.2 ± 1.9 mV, n = 5; with 10 nM FMRP(1-297)-tat, −75.6 ± 2.3 mV, n = 5; p = 0.0072; paired sample Student's t test).
We then examined the pattern of FMRP(1-297)-tat protein distribution after its introduction by tail vein injection. FMRP normally exhibits a widespread expression across the brain with high levels detected in cell body layers of the cerebellum, cortex, and hippocampus 12,13,22 . Immunocytochemical tests using an antibody against the FMRP C-terminus confirmed this expression pattern in WT mice on the FVB.129P2 background. In the cerebellum FMRP immunolabel was apparent across all ten lobules with labeling of the granule cell layer in WT mice ( Fig. 4b) 12,13 . At higher magnification FMRP immunolabel was detected in virtually all neuronal cell types including granule and Purkinje cells, with label restricted primarily to the cell body regions (Fig. 4c, d). Fmr1 KO mice injected with vehicle and prepared for immunocytochemistry 30 min later produced no labeling when tested with an antibody against HA (Fig. 4e). We next tail vein injected 1.0 mg/kg HA-FMRP(1-297)-tat in P25-P40 Fmr1 KO mice (nominally 500 nM plasma concentration at the time of injection) and 30 min or 12 h later processed brains for immunocytochemistry. HA immunolabel was apparent in all layers of the cerebellum within 30 min of injecting HA-FMRP(1-297)-tat, indicating a rapid permeation of the BBB and cerebellar cells (Fig. 4f, g). HA immunolabel was detected within granule and Purkinje cell bodies as well as additional labeling in the molecular layer that did not clearly correspond to Purkinje cell dendrites (Fig. 4f, g). In WT mice an antibody against the FMRP C-terminus detected prominent labeling in the cell body regions of cortical layers, hippocampus, and dentate gyrus, with no clear dendritic label (Fig. 4h). Tail vein injections of HA-FMRP(1-297)-tat into Fmr1 KO mice again labeled primarily cell bodies of pyramidal cells in the cortex ( Fig. 4i-k) and hippocampus ( Fig. 4l-n) with exclusion of the nucleus and no apparent labeling of apical or basal dendrites counter labeled with MAP2. As found in cerebellum additional labeling for HA could be found outside neocortical or hippocampal pyramidal cell somas in regions of synaptic inputs (Fig. 4j, m).
In an additional set of tests we tail vein-injected 1.0 mg/kg HA-FMRP(1-297)-tat and confirmed the presence of detectable HA immunolabel in whole-brain sections reacted after fixation at 2, 12, 24, and 48 h and processed/imaged under identical conditions to make qualitative comparisons of HA labeling intensities (Fig. 5). HA immunolabel could be detected at 2 h in cerebellum and with even higher fluorescence intensity in neocortical tissue sections, but not in animals injected with vehicle alone (Fig. 5a, b). By 12 h HA fluorescence was higher in both the cerebellum and neocortex in being detected as a label in cerebellar Purkinje cells and with additional localization in the neuropil and many cell bodies of neocortical regions. By 24 h HA immunofluorescence intensities had dropped in both locations and by 48 h immunofluorescence for HA immunolabel was just detectable (Fig. 5a, b). An interaction between HA-FMRP(1-297)-tat and Cav3.1 and Kv4.3 channels in Fmr1 KO mice was further verified by obtaining a coIP between HA and these channels 5 h after tail vein injection (n = 3) (Fig. 5c).
FMRP(1-297)-tat is nontoxic to cultured granule cells. To test for potential toxicity of the FMRP(1-297)-tat peptide we prepared dissociated cultures of cerebellar granule cells from Fmr1 KO mice and at 3 days in vitro (DIV) applied HA-FMRP (1-297)-tat over a range of 1-500 nM (Fig. 6b, c). Dual labeling for MAP2 and HA confirmed that uptake of FMRP(1-297)-tat by cultured granule cells occurred within 2 h of exposure (Fig. 6a-c). Cells were exposed to treatments for either 24 h or 5 days (culture medium changed every 2 days) before flow cytometric analysis of labeling using a live-dead cell kit. Exposure to either vehicle alone or up to 500 nM FMRP(1-297)-tat showed no significant increase in the number of compromised cells up to 5 days following the treatment (Fig. 6d-g; Supplementary Fig. 5).
These results reveal that FMRP(1-297)-tat peptide can cross the BBB and gain substantial access to cells across the cerebellum and other brain regions within 30 min of injection. Moreover, the FMRP(1-297)-tat peptide did not compromise cell health over time even when applied directly to cultured granule cells at a dose of 500 nM.
FMRP(1-297)-tat restores mossy fiber-granule cell LTP. To test the effects of FMRP(1-297)-tat on cell activity we tail vein injected FMRP(1-297)-tat peptide into P16-P22 Fmr1 KO mice and 2 h later prepared in vitro slices to test the ability to evoke LTP. Injecting 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat promoted LTP of the EPSP amplitude 10-15 min post TBS and reliably increased spike firing probability for at least 15 min following TBS (Fig. 7a, b). Indeed, the degree of EPSP potentiation and increase in firing probability was strikingly similar to that detected in WT mice (cf. Figs. 1a and 7a), indicating that systemic administration of FMRP (1-297)-tat promoted greater EPSP potentiation than did direct postsynaptic infusion of FMRP(1-297). In contrast, injecting 0.2 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat did not rescue mossy fiber LTP (Fig. 7c,  d), even though FMRP immunolabel can be detected in cerebellum 2 h after tail vein injection ( Supplementary Fig. 6). Similarly, tail vein injection of tat epitope alone (1.0 mg/kg) showed no LTP in response to mossy fiber TBS when slices were prepared 2 h later (Fig. 7e, f).
These data functionally validate the ability for FMRP(1-297)tat to access cerebellar neurons in vivo and reveal a concentration-dependent effect on its ability to restore synaptic plasticity. The finding that 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat injection promoted LTP that was comparable to WT mice is also important in suggesting an additional potential influence of FMRP(1-297)tat on presynaptic elements not accessed by postsynaptic infusion of FMRP(1-297).
FMRP(1-297)-tat reduces elevated activity in Fmr1 KO mice. Hyperactivity and anxiety are symptoms exhibited by FXS patients 23,24 that have been assessed in the Fmr1 KO mouse model in terms of activity levels in the open field test (OFT) [25][26][27] . We therefore used OFT to quantify the extent to which tail vein injection of FMRP(1-297)-tat might rescue elevated levels of activity in Fmr1 KO mice. For this we tail vein injected 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat in male P55-P100 mice. In agreement with previous work, vehicle-treated Fmr1 KO mice traveled a significantly greater distance and with a higher velocity during a 30 min period than vehicle-treated WT mice (Fig. 8). We then injected WT and Fmr1 KO animals with different amounts of FMRP(1-297)-tat and conducted OFT 1, 24, or 48 h later. A twoway ANOVA analysis indicated a genotype-dependent effect of FMRP(1-297)-tat (interaction of genotype and treatment, p = 0.012). One hour after administering 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat, Fmr1 KO mice traveled significantly less than vehicle injected Fmr1 KO animals, while WT mice injected with 1.0 mg/kg FMRP (1-297)-tat showed no significant change (Fig. 8a, left panel). Oneway ANOVA revealed a concentration-dependent effect of FMRP  (1-297)-tat, with a significant reduction in the distance traveled by Fmr1 KO mice for 1.0 mg/kg but not for 0.2 or 2.0 mg/kg FMRP (1-297)-tat (Fig. 8a, right panel). The same pattern was detected at 1 h post injection for measures of velocity (Fig. 8d). Injecting 1.0 mg/kg tat epitope alone to Fmr1 KO mice had no effect on either distance or velocity measurements (Fig. 8a, d, right panels). Twenty-four hours after injecting FMRP(1-297)-tat the distance and velocity were slightly reduced from vehicle-treated Fmr1 KO mice at all doses, but not to significant levels (Fig. 8b, e). Fortyeight hours after FMRP(1-297)-tat injections the levels of activity had returned to levels not significantly different from vehicletreated Fmr1 KO mice (Fig. 8c, f).
FMRP(1-297)-tat restores protein levels in Fmr1 KO mice. A second established role for FMRP is regulation of protein translation, where loss of FMRP alters the expression levels of multiple proteins that contribute to circuit dysfunction 14,[28][29][30][31][32] . To determine if FMRP(1-297)-tat could influence protein translation we used Western blots in lysates of cerebellum or brain to measure the levels of a select set of proteins previously shown to be altered in Fmr1 KO mice. These tests established that αCaMKII and the amyloid precursor protein (APP) are significantly elevated in cerebellar and brain lysates of P21-30 Fmr1 KO compared to WT mice (Fig. 9a, b). In contrast, the level of PSD95 protein was lower in Fmr1 KO cerebellar (but not brain) lysates compared to WT (Fig. 9c). A single tail vein injection of 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat significantly reduced these differences in protein levels in both cerebellum and brain samples even 24 h after injection, without affecting the similar baseline values for PSD95 in brain samples. Interestingly, the levels of all three proteins in WT animals did not significantly change after FMRP(1-297)-tat injections (Fig. 9).

Discussion
Several studies have attempted to restore FMRP in Fmr1 KO mice through viral injections, tat-conjugated peptides, or by targeting the hypermethylation that blocks transcription of the Fmr1 gene [33][34][35][36][37] . Success was gained by reintroducing FMRP by viral transfection but this was offset by variability in the distribution and expression levels of FMRP, and deleterious effects if overexpressed 35,37,38 . Others have used a pharmacological approach to counteract downstream signaling molecules that are disrupted when FMRP is lost 39,40 . Another strategy is to use a tat-conjugate peptide to increase access across the BBB and cell membranes.
The only other study that explored a tat-conjugate approach tested a full-length FMRP 36 and reported toxicity on cultured fibroblasts by ∼7.5 nM, dampening enthusiasm for a tat-conjugate approach to treating FXS. We tested an N-terminal fragment of FMRP that has been shown to affect specific ion channels 11,[16][17][18] . The results indicate that FMRP(1-297)-tat has the ability to shift the biophysical properties of Cav3.1 and Kv4.3 channels, rescue LTP of mossy fiber input to cerebellum, restore levels of proteins in Fmr1 KO mice for at least 24 h, and reduce elevated levels of activity in Fmr1 KO animals at 1 h post-FMRPtat injection, but not at 24 or 48 h post-injection. No toxicity was detected up to 5 days after direct exposure of cultured cells to 500 nM FMRP(1-297)-tat. Together these data indicate the ability to use a tat peptide-based approach to restore FMRP-related circuit function in the mouse model of FXS. Our tests using immunocytochemistry indicate that HA-FMRP (1-297)-tat is rapidly taken up following tail vein injection and distributed widely across the cerebellar-cortical axis. Most of the structures known to label for FMRP in WT mice 12,13 were labeled after HA-FMRP(1-297)-tat injection, with a preference for uptake and/or sequestration at the soma. Additional labeling could be detected outside neuronal somata, such as in layers with a prominent synaptic component (i.e., molecular layer of cerebellum). The extent to which this labeling reflects uptake by glial or synaptic components is unknown. We also can not ensure that all structures will take up FMRP(1-297)-tat to the levels required for a desired function, even though mossy fiber LTP was rapidly restored using the concentrations tested here. However, the results are extremely promising in revealing uptake of FMRP (1-297)-tat across the brain axis in a very short period of time and retention of the HA immunolabel tag or FMRP(1-297) up to 48 h later. Tail vein injection of 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat was sufficient to achieve therapeutic actions from the cellular to behavioral level in 1-2 h. We found a progressive increase in HA immunolabel up to 12 h in terms of fluorescence intensity in tissue sections, with just detectable levels by 48 h. However, we do not know if the molecule remains fully intact or is in the process of degradation/elimination, as suggested by a lower signal level at 48 h. It is possible that future work will identify suitable shorter length FMRP constructs or modifications to the tat peptide that will further improve the speed of transport across the BBB or the retention of FMRP(1-297) in situ [41][42][43] .
Fragile X patients exhibit symptoms that have been correlated to the degree of hypoplasia of the posterior cerebellar vermis 3,44,45 . The results obtained here on cerebellar synaptic plasticity and cell output are thus relevant to the conditions inherent to patient populations and to lobule 9 granule cells where the work is centered. The actions of FMRP(1-297)-tat were detected at multiple levels of cell and circuit function.
Previous work has shown that intracellular infusion of the Nterminal fragment FMRP(1-297) can increase activation of Slack, SK2, BK, and Kv1.2 potassium channels 11,[16][17][18]46 . The molecular sites for interaction were identified between FMRP(1-297) and Cterminal regions of both Kv1.2 11 and Slack potassium channels 16 . The ability to detect an interaction with Kv1.2 depends on the state of phosphorylation 11 , identifying an additional factor to consider when testing FMRP(1-297) interactions. The current study identifies Cav3.1 calcium and Kv4.3 potassium channels as two previously unrecognized interactors with the FMRP Nterminus (1-297), raising the number of channel isoforms that can be modified by this FMRP fragment to six. In the case of Kv4.3 the modulation was apparent at the level of biophysical properties without a change in Kv4.3 channel density. Further work will thus be needed to define how an N-terminal FMRP fragment interacts at the molecular level with each member of a Cav3-Kv4-KChIP3 complex that together regulate Kv4 current amplitude 19,[47][48][49] .
FMRP is known to play a key role in regulating protein translation 28,[30][31][32]50 . Here, we found that FMRP(1-297)-tat reduced differences in protein levels detected between Fmr1 KO and WT mice regardless of whether the levels were initially  Our data reveal that FMRP is a constituent member of the Cav3-Kv4 complex with a role for FMRP in promoting LTP at the mossy fiber synapse, a function it shares with other central synapses by enabling long-term potentiation or depression 37,51 . Indeed, the short time required for FMRP(1-297) infusion to restore the capacity to evoke LTP suggests that FMRP is a critical element in the pathways activated by mossy fiber stimulation 8 . Tail vein injections of 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat also had a greater influence on EPSP potentiation and granule cell firing rate than direct infusion of FMRP(1-297) into granule cells. The full effects of FMRP(1-297)-tat on mossy fiber-evoked LTP must then be exerted on additional elements accessed by the tat-conjugate peptide that are not influenced by direct postsynaptic infusion. It is important to clarify that we can not conclude that the rescue of mossy fiber plasticity by FMRP(1-297)-tat is directly linked to a reduction in elevated levels of activity in the OFT. Rather, we focused on the mossy fiber-granule cell synapse as a representative synapse to gauge the effectiveness of introducing FMRP(1-297)-tat on ionic and synaptic function. Activity in the OFT can be interpreted in the context of either hyperactivity or anxiety, both of which are characteristic of Fragile X patients 23,24 . Further work will be needed to distinguish between these possibilities. However, measures of activity in the OFT can be assumed to reflect the combined output of multiple brain regions that could be influenced by HA-FMRP-tat that distributes widely over the cerebellar-cortical axis and restores protein levels in both cerebellar and whole brain lysates. While the full range of sites affected by HA-FMRP-tat remain to be determined, the results are important in reviving the potential to use a tat peptidebased approach to replace an active fragment of FMRP to rescue circuit function in FXS.  Shown are plots of mossy fiber-evoked EPSP amplitude and spike firing probability measured in granule cells from Fmr1 KO mice in slices prepared 2 h following tail vein injections. EPSP amplitudes were calculated only for stimuli that were subthreshold to spike discharge. LTP in response to TBS of mossy fibers is restored to near WT levels by prior injection of 1.0 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat in terms of EPSP amplitude (a) (% change in EPSP: 141.0 ± 23.2%, n = 5 cells from 5 mice), firing probability (b) (resting condition 2.0 ± 2.2%, after TBS 36.8 ± 18.4%, n = 5 cells from 5 mice), but with no effect following 0.2 mg/kg FMRP(1-297)-tat injection (c, d) (% change in EPSP: 99.6 ± 10.9%, n = 5 cells from 5 mice) or injection of the tat epitope alone (e, d) (% change in EPSP: 100.4 ± 1.2%, n = 5 cells from 4 mice; no spikes fired in resting condition or after TBS was delivered). Average values are mean ± s.e.m. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Methods
accordance with ethical guidelines of the Canadian Council of Animal Care reviewed and approved by a Cumming School of Medicine Animal Care Committee. All animals had free access to water and food with a daily temperature of 20-23°C and relative humidity of 40-60%. The light cycle was controlled as 12 h light and dark cycle. For electrophysiology and behavioral tests, male mice were used. For Western blot and coimmunoprecipitation tests samples were harvested from both males and females.
Brain slice preparation. Sagittal cerebellar sections for electrophysiological recordings were prepared from P16 to P22 male mice as previously described 19 . Briefly, animals were anaesthetized by isoflurane inhalation and the cerebella were dissected out and placed in ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) composed of (in mM): 125 NaCl, 25 NaHCO 3 , 25 D-glucose, 3.25 KCl, 1.5 CaCl 2 , 1.5 MgCl 2 bubbled with carbogen (95% O 2 and 5% CO 2 ) gas. Tissue slices of 260 µm thickness were cut by vibratome (Leica VT1200 S) and allowed to recover for 20-30 min at 37°C and then at room temperature (RT) (25°C) in aCSF bubbled with carbogen gas. For recordings slices were moved to a recording chamber which temperature was maintained at 31-33°C on the stage of an Olympus BX51W1 microscope. Unless otherwise indicated all chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Dissociated granule cell culture and flow cytometry. Cerebella were dissected out from anesthetized P6 Fmr1 KO mice, diced and trypsinized in Hanks' balanced salt solution/bovine serum albumin (BSA) dissection solutions 52 . Isolated cells were plated onto 24-well plates coated with poly-D-lysine (1 μg/ml) at a total number of 1 × 10 6 each well. Cultured cells were incubated at 37°C under 5% CO 2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, insulin (5 μg/ml), KCl (25 mM) and 1% pen-streptomycin. After culture for 24 h, cytosine β-D-arabinofuranoside (5 μM) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the culture medium for 24 h to inhibit the proliferation of nonneuronal cells and medium was changed every two days. A single dose of different concentrations of FMRP(1-297)-tat peptide was applied in the granule cell culture medium at 3 DIV or 7 DIV. At 8 DIV cells were labeled with a live-dead assay kit (ab115347, Abcam) before being analyzed with a flow cytometer BD LSR II (BD Biosciences) at 488 nm excitation wavelength. Emission of labeled dye was detected at 530 nm for FITC channel and 695 nm for PerCP-CY5-5 channel. Forward scatter, side scatter and  For whole-cell voltage clamp recordings, series resistance was compensated to at least 70% and leak was subtracted offline in pClamp 10 software. For current clamp recordings cells with lower than −55 mV resting membrane potential were accepted, and less than 50 pA negative bias current applied to maintain a resting potential at ∼−80 mV. Cells were allowed to equilibrate to the internal pipette solution for 3-5 min before recordings. Voltage-clamp recordings of Kv4 potassium current used an internal electrolyte of (mM): 140 KCl, 10 HEPES, 2.5 MgCl 2 , 0.1 EGTA, pH 7.3 via KOH, with 5 di-tris-creatine phosphate, 2 Tris-ATP, and 0.5 Na-GTP added from fresh frozen stock each day. The external medium contained 30 µM CdCl 2 to block HVA calcium channels together with 2 mM CsCl, 5 mM TEA, 1 μM TTX, glutamate receptor blockers DL-AP5 (25 µM) and DNQX (10 µM), and the inhibitory synaptic blockers picrotoxin (50 μM) and CGP55845 (1 μM). In recordings of Kv4 current before and after mossy fiber TBS the internal solution was composed of (mM) 140 KCl, 10 HEPES, 2.5 MgCl 2 , 0.15 BAPTA, 0.05 CaCl 2 , with 200 μM QX-314 internal to replace external TTX, and 5 di-tris-creatine phosphate, 2 Tris-ATP, and 0.5 Na-GTP added from fresh frozen stock each day, pH 7.3 via KOH. The external medium had no calcium channel blockers, but contained 2 mM CsCl, 5 mM TEA, and the inhibitory synaptic blockers 50 μM picrotoxin and 1 μM CGP55845. Kv4 or Cav3.1 activation and inactivation plots were calculated from currents evoked from a holding potential of −110 mV stepped in 10 mV (1000 ms) increments to 60 mV, followed by a return step to −30 mV (500 ms) as the test potential 8,9 . For tests on the involvement of protein translation on the shift in Kv4 Vh with LTP, 20 µM anisomycin was pre-applied to tissue slices for 2 h at RT and throughout recordings.
Current clamp recordings used an internal solution modified from Gall et al. 53 : 126 K-gluconate, 4 NaCl, 15 Glucose, 5 HEPES, 1 MgSO 4 , 0.15 BAPTA, 0.05 CaCl 2 , pH 7.3 via KOH, with 5 di-tris-creatine phosphate, 2 Tris-ATP, and 0.5 Na-GTP added from fresh frozen stock each day. The external medium contained 50 μM picrotoxin and 1 μM CGP55845. Mossy fibers were stimulated with a concentric bipolar electrode (Frederick Haer, CBCMX75 (JL2)) placed near the border of mossy fiber input and the granule cell layer using a Digitimer stimulus isolation unit (0.3 ms pulse). The stimulation protocol was the same as in Sola et al. 54 , using a TBS pattern (8 bursts of 10 impulses at 100 Hz, 250 ms interburst interval) at a stimulus intensity that initially evoked a threshold EPSC or EPSP from a holding potential of −80 mV. For current-clamp recordings, TBS was delivered from a holding potential of ∼−65 mV. For voltage-clamp recordings of Kv4 current the TBS was paired with a postsynaptic voltage step from −70 to −40 mV for the duration of the TBS synaptic train (3 s total) as in D'Angelo et al. 55 . While TBS in current-clamp recordings used only synaptic stimulation. A 5 min period was used to establish baseline synaptic amplitudes before presenting TBS and EPSPs were recorded at 0.1 Hz to monitor LTP. EPSP amplitudes were calculated only for cases subthreshold to spike discharge and LTP was measured with respect to the mean value of all control records of baseline EPSP amplitude.
FMRP(1-297)-tat proteins were delivered once by tail vein injection to animals under transient isoflurane anesthesia by inhalation (Midmark, Ohio) at 0.2-2.0 mg/ kg (approximately 0.1-1 µM in blood upon injection) in 0.9% NaCl to a 200 µl volume, with an equivalent dilution of Elution Buffer (see above) to prepare vehicle for control groups. Injected animals were provided at least 1 h recovery time before any behavioral tests or 2 h before in vitro slice experiments were conducted.
Immunostaining. Tissue for immunohistochemistry was obtained from P30 to P60 Fmr1 KO or WT mice 8 . Animals were anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation until unresponsive to ear pinch and then perfused intracardially with 20 ml 0.1 M phosphate-buffer (PB, pH 7.4) followed by 20 ml 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, pH 7.4) at RT. Brains were stored in 4% PFA at RT for 1 h and then overnight at 4°C. Sagittal sections of 50 μm thickness were cut by vibratome (Leica VT1000 S, Germany) in PB. Tissue sections were blocked with a solution containing 10% normal goat serum, 0.2% DMSO and 0.1% TWEEN-20 and reacted overnight under 4°C with the following primary antibodies diluted in working solution: rabbit monoclonal anti-FMRP C-terminal antibody (1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, 7104S), mouse monoclonal anti-HA (1:300, Abcam, ab130275), and chicken polyclonal anti-MAP2 (1:500, Abcam, ab92434) in dual labeling experiments. Primary antibodies were omitted in control sections for each experimental series. After washing in PB, sections were exposed for 1-2 h at RT to AlexaFluor 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1000, Invitrogen, A11032) or AlexaFluor 488-conjugated goat anti-chicken IgG (1:1000, Invitrogen, A11039) and AlexaFluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:1000, Invitrogen, A32740). Sections were washed 3 × 10 min in PB, mounted in Molecular Probes gold antifade medium and stored at −20°C. Immunocytochemistry in granule cell culture was performed with the same process with minor modifications. Briefly, granule cell cultures were fixed in 4% PFA followed by 3 washes in PBS. Cells were permeabilized in PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 and blocked with 3% BSA in PBST buffer (0.1% Tween-20 in PBS). Imaging was conducted on a Zeiss Axioimager (Zen software) with Colibri LED illumination. Exposures were constrained to those used for control sections and post processing was restricted to equivalent adjustments of brightness/contrast for qualitative comparisons (Zen, Photoshop). Tiled montage images of cerebellar tissue sections were compiled from 80 to 90 images at 20× magnification (Zen).
Open field test. Different parameters of animal motion were quantified through an OFT using an overhead acA1300-60 hm camera (Basler, DE) and Noldus Ethovision XT 13 software (Leesburg VA). Male mice of P55-P100 age were placed in a square plexiglass chamber of 38 cm × 38 cm × 30 cm dimension and recorded during free movement for 30 min. A 4 × 4 grid pattern was applied to quantify different parameters during the OFT. HA-FMRP(1-297)-tat or vehicle were administered into animals as mentioned above. Analysis of total distance and duration of movement was conducted using Noldus Ethovision XT 13 and velocity was calculated by dividing total distance with duration for moving.
Data analysis and statistical methods. Inactivation curves were fitted according to the Boltzmann equation: I/(I − I max ) = 1/(1 + exp((Vh − V)/k)), where Vh is the half inactivation potential and k is the slope factor. Activation curves were fit according to the Boltzmann equation: G/(G − G max ) = 1/(1 + exp((Va − V)/k)), where G is calculated with equation G = I/(V − V rev ), Va is the half activation potential and k is the slope factor. Inactivation and activation plots were constructed using Origin 8.0 (OriginLab, Northampton, MA). All figures were prepared and statistical analysis were performed using OriginPro 8 or GraphPad Prism 6, and Adobe Illustrator CC 2018 software.
Statistical significance was determined using a two-sample Student's t test for distinct samples, and a paired-sample Student's t tests for the same samples under different conditions. One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc comparison (Tukey's multiple comparison) was used to analyze the statistical significance of more than two groups. In the OFT (Fig. 8) and protein translation test (Fig. 9), two-way ANOVA was applied to analyze the effect of genotype and treatment and their interactions, when necessary one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey's comparison was applied to test the significance of different treatments in Fmr1 KO mice. Normality of data was tested and there was no exclusion of outlier data points. Two-tailed analysis was chosen for all statistical tests.
Reporting summary. Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability
All relevant data are available without restriction from the authors, with the original values for data underlying Figs. 1-3