{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03589527027027027, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019425675675675675, 'mean_word_length': 5.089974293059126, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Isoseparation curves: a mechanism for optimizing off-axis dose homogeneity of intact breast irradiation.

The purpose of this paper is to determine whether using off-axis isoseparation curves to optimize the collimator rotation angle improves dose homogeneity. Eleven intact breast irradiation patients underwent computerized tomography (CT) treatment planning with 1 cm abutting slices. Central plane treatment planning, using 6 MV photons, tissue inhomogeneity corrections, and isocentric opposed tangent treatment fields, was performed. Collimators were rotated to match chest wall slope through the use of a beam's-eye-view setting. Patient separations were measured from the apex of the breast to the posterior field border on each axial CT slice. Sagittal-plane isoseparation curves were constructed from these measurements. Using these curves, the collimator rotation that minimized off-axis separation differences was determined. A comparison of off-axis dose inhomogeneity was performed for patients with a > or =10 degrees difference between this optimized collimator angle and the angle determined by chest wall slope. These comparative treatment plans differed only with respect to collimator angle rotation. The mean optimal collimator rotation angle differed significantly from the mean rotation angle which matched the chest wall slope (5.4 degrees vs. 11 degrees, respectively, P < 0.001). Four of the 11 patients had rotation angle differences of 10 degrees. In these patients, the optimization of collimator angle reduced the percentage of breast volume to "that" received > or =110% of the prescribed dose. For the patient with the largest breast size to the patient with the smallest breast size the decreases were, respectively, 5% (15% to 10%), 3% (24% to 21%), 1% (4% to 3%), and 1% (0.9% to 0%). The mean reduction in dose inhomogeneity was greatest in the inferior breast quadrants. At 6 cm and 4 cm off axis, the mean reductions in the percentages of the breast tissue to "that" received 110% of the prescribed dose were respectively 15.1% and 5.3 %. Optimizing the collimator angle through the use of isoseparation curves decreases dose inhomogeneity. The greatest improvements are in the inferior quadrants of the intact breast. The improved dose homogeneity may have clinical relevance in the treatment of patients with large breast sizes.