{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05478547854785479, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015841584158415842, 'mean_word_length': 4.6992481203007515, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Experimental validation of DXA and MRI-based bone density measurement by ash-method].

Different methods have been established for bone density measurements such as dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative computertomography (QCT), and scintigraphy (VQ-Scan). There are hints that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might become a new option for the evaluation of bone density. The aim of this study was to investigate correlations between MRI vs. DXA and MRI vs. mineral content of lumbar vertebrae. Data were obtained from ten lumbar vertebral bodies of cattles. The T-1 MRI-sequences SE, PS, and the T-2 Sequence STIR were used for analysis. Total pixel numbers and a pixel per area ratio were determined. Values were compared to DXA-measurements, to the wet weight, and to separated measurements of the spongious, trabecular, and total mineral content of the vertebral body after ashing. We found correlations between DXA (g/vertebral body) vs. mineral content by ash-method (0.918; p < 0.01), DXA vs. MRI (SE-sequence) (-0.872; p < 0.01), and MRI (SE-sequence) vs. mineral content (0.775; p < 0.01). No correlations were found between PS- or STIR-sequences and the ash-method. This study shows that the determination of the bone mineral content of vertebrae is possible applying MRI in the T1-weighted SE-sequence. Without radiation, the MRI provides additionally early detection of trabecular lesions, fractures, and deformities at the spine, without other diagnostic procedures becoming necessary.