{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024727992087042534, 'fraction_numerical': 0.032640949554896145, 'mean_word_length': 5.2631578947368425, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Identification of Novel Nrf2 Activator via Protein-ligand Interactions as Remedy for Oxidative Stress in Diabetes Mellitus



 Oxidative stress is a significant player in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein1/nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/antioxidant response element (Keap1/Nrf2/ARE) signaling pathway serves as the essential defense system to mitigate oxidative stress. Nrf2 is responsible for the mitigation of oxidative stress while Keap1 represses Nrf2’s activation upon binding. Identification of Nrf2 activators has started to pick up enthusiasm as they can be used as therapeutic agents against diabetes mellitus. One of the ongoing mechanisms in the activation of Nrf2 is to disrupt Keap1/Nrf2 protein-protein interaction. This study aimed at using computational analysis to screen natural compounds capable of inhibiting Keap1/Nrf2 protein-protein interaction.



A manual curated library of natural compounds was screened against crystal structure of Keap1 using glide docking algorithm. Binding free energy of the docked complexes, and adsorption, digestion, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties were further employed to identify the hit compounds. The bioactivity of the identified hit against Keap1 was predicted using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model.



A total of 7 natural compounds (Compound 222, 230, 310, 208, 210, 229 and 205) identified from different medicinal plants were found to be potent against Keap1 based on their binding affinity and binding free energy. The internal validated model kpls_radial_30 with R2 of 0.9109, Q2 of 0.7287 was used to predict the compounds’ bioactivities. Compound 205 was considered as the ideal drug candidate because it showed moderation for ADME properties, had predicted pIC50 of 6.614 and obeyed Lipinski’s rule of five.



This study revealed that Compound 205, a compound isolated from Amphipterygium adstringens is worth considering for further experimental analysis.
