{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017711171662125342, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007493188010899182, 'mean_word_length': 5.120833333333334, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The RUSI martial potency index 2001

BY MICHAEL CODNER This Index, which until 1999 was published in the annual RUSI International Security Review, is designed to give a measure of a nation's ability to use its armed forces to influence events beyond its own borders. The Index is logarithmic to allow the United States at one extreme and some of the smallest nations at the other to appear on a single ranking from approximately 0 to 10. It uses the quantitative measures of defence spending and manpower numbers. Manpower figures include conscripts, reserves and paramilitary forces but these are modified to take account of the differing utility of these categories. Figures are adjusted using two additional measures. The first, the Defence Commitment Quotient, is a measure of government and popular commitment to defence and integrates such factors as defence budget per capita and defence spending as a proportion of GDP. The second, the Proactivity Quotient, is a measure of the extent to which a nation might be prepared to deploy its forces beyond its own borders and be effective in doing so. This measure aggregates a number of judgements including: type of government (military dictatorship, democracy with proportional representation &c); participation in coalitions; history of intervention: recent experience of combat; and internal problems of disorder and insurrection. These two additional measures typically modify the index figure by a few tenths.