{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030784508440913606, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018867924528301886, 'mean_word_length': 4.8604651162790695, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The effect of minimum luminal nutrition on mucosal cellularity and immunity of the gut

Many catabolic patients can only consume small volumes of enteral nutrients. The aim of this study was to evaluate markers of cellularity and immunity in the small intestine of rats randomized to receive 6 days of parenteral nutrition, 25% enteral and 75% parenteral nutrition (i.e. minimum luminal nutrition) or enteral nutrition. The same glutamine‐enriched solution was used for both parenteral and enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition was associated with the least amount of jejunal atrophy (P < 0.01), with the results from the minimum luminal nutrition group approximating those of the parenteral nutrition group. Parenteral nutrition was associated with the greatest number of CD2+ cells ( P < 0.05) and the lowest CD4/CD8 cell ratio ( P < 0.01) in the jejunal mucosa. In essence, we failed to demonstrate that there are any appreciable benefits associated with the enteral consumption of 25% of a nutrient load.