{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02478134110787172, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0058309037900874635, 'mean_word_length': 5.41588785046729, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation--operative or conservative therapy?].

42 patients with complete acromioclavicular dislocation treated operatively and 38 patients managed non-operatively were examined retrospectively with a mean follow-up of 6.3 +/- 2.5 years. The dislocations in both groups included type III and type V injuries according to the Rockwood-classification. The operative technique was suturing of the tom ligaments and stabilization of the acromioclavicular joint using resorbable coracoclavicular PDS-banding. In non-operative treatment, early physiotherapy accepting the deformity was performed in most of the patients. The clinical results using the UCLA- and the Constant-Murley score as well as evaluation of pain, function and strength were similar in both groups. Those patients suffering from a more severe dislocation type Rockwood V who were treated non-operatively had as good results as those patients with grade III dislocation. Posttraumatic osteoarthritis developed mainly in those patients whose acromioclavicular joint healed in partial dislocation. Non-operative treatment was equal even in less severe dislocations in the subgroup of type Rockwood V injuries. The persisting deformity which must be expected in non-operative treatment did not affect the patient's outcome regarding pain, function and strength of the shoulder.