{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026508226691042046, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0009140767824497258, 'mean_word_length': 4.887096774193548, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Crack Front Curvature in the Wedge Test

The wedge test, as used for the evaluation of adhesive fracture energy, is usually considered to be a 2D geometry: its simple analysis implies independence of the width of the adhesive joint, b. Recent work has shown this to be an over-simplification, at least in some circumstances, with (hypothesised) anticlastic bending giving rise to curvature of the crack front. As a result, crack front length, a, varies across the joint width leading to ambiguity in the interpretation of results to obtain fracture energy, G c . This contribution constitutes a more detailed analysis of the geometry of the wedge test (in the particular case of one bending and one rigid substrate), treating the bent member as a plate, rather than as a simple beam. The Kirchhoff-Love plate theory is applied and solved by a perturbation method. Secondary curvature of the beam in the direction normal to the principal curvature results directly from the treatment, and this, in turn, leads to a concave crack front, corroborating the above-mentioned experimental observation.