{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027364663890541343, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018441403926234383, 'mean_word_length': 4.820069204152249, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Role of mammography in the triple assessment of single‐quadrant breast symptoms (Br J Surg 2011: 98: 951–955)

Background: Most women over the age of 35 years referred to a breast clinic have single-quadrant symptoms and undergo mammography (MMG) as part of the triple assessment of these. A proportion of these women has no abnormality clinically or on ultrasonography (P1 U1). The aim of this study was to assess the additional contribution of MMG in diagnosing cancer in patients with P1 U1 findings and to consider whether it is safe to be more selective when requesting MMG. Methods: Over a 2-year interval the clinical and radiological details of women whose single-quadrant breast symptoms were assessed as P1 U1, and who were then sent for MMG, were entered into a database. The results of further investigations initiated by a non-benign MMG report were recorded, and the patients reviewed to establish how many cancers were diagnosed purely by MMG and whether these were located at the site of symptoms. Results: There were 454 women in the study group, representing 17·5 per cent of all new referrals. Twenty-one patients (4·6 per cent) were recalled following a non-benign MMG result, ten of whom required image-guided biopsy. Cancer was diagnosed in three patients (0·7 per cent of the study group), located in the contralateral breast in two women and a different ipsilateral quadrant in one. Conclusion: MMG in this subset of patients did not increase the cancer detection rate at the site of symptoms and therefore constituted screening. The rationale for requesting MMG in these patients, and indeed for applying the triple assessment rule, should be reconsidered.