{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0175054704595186, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.026315789473684, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Battle of Oinoe, the Painting in the Stoa Poikile, and Thucydides’ Silence

Thucydides’ silence is an insufficient reason for rejecting the historicity of the battle of Oinoe in light of the positive evidence for the battle, not least of which is the presence of the painting of the battle in the Stoa Poikile representing an alteration of the original Cimonian program with the purpose of propagandizing the nascent democracy’s new anti-Spartan policy.