{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010638297872340425, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.730434782608696, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparative study between hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in case of infertility.

From the present study it can be concluded that both the procedures have their own importance and no one can substitute the other, in diagnosing all the diseases. HSG has been found to be more rewarding in cases of abnormalities of the lumen of uterus and fallopian tubes for their patency. On the other hand laparoscopy has been more rewarding for the abnormalities of the surface of uterus, fallopian tubes and ovaries. It is suggested that in all the cases of infertility both the procedures should be done and the HSG should be done first followed by laparoscopy.