{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015804597701149427, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.729468599033816, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Monocyte chemotaxis and chemotactic cytokine release after exposure to hydroxyethyl starch

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is commonly used in leukapheresis and infused as an alternative to blood components for the treatment of hypotension due to hemorrhage and trauma. Its prolonged intravascular persistence and retention in tissue raise concerns about possible effects on humoral and cell‐mediated immunity and white cell (WBC) locomotion, particularly in volunteer WBC donors or in severely burned individuals with immunologic depression and increased risk for infection. This study evaluated the effect of HES on human monocyte migration and chemotaxis and the production of antigen‐ and mitogen‐induced WBC‐ derived chemotactic cytokine. A bioassay was developed to quantitate the neutrophil chemotactic activity of a cytokine generated by mononuclear WBCs stimulated in vitro by phytohemagglutinin or tuberculin protein. The time‐ and dose‐dependent generation of the chemotactic cytokine was not affected by the presence of HES. HES by itself did not induce the generation of this cytokine, nor were human monocyte chemotaxis and spontaneous migration significantly changed by exposure to HES. These results, with those of other investigators, suggest that HES is a safe red cell‐sedimenting agent for leukapheresis and an alternative to the use of blood components in shock resuscitation.