{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019242706393544383, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.296875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Relations of Enhanced High‐Latitude Concurrent Blockings With Recent Warm Arctic‐Cold Continent Patterns

A warm Arctic‐cold continent (WACC) pattern has been one of the main characteristics of the Northern Hemisphere (NH) climate variability in winter during the last two decades. However, the factors contributing this pattern remain unclear. We compared the two leading modes of surface temperature in the NH winter on an interdecadal timescale and explored the role of high‐latitude concurrent blockings (HCBs) and the Arctic oscillation (AO) in these two modes. Results show that the first mode resembling the WACC pattern is more related to enhanced HCBs over the Ural Mountains and the North Pacific than the AO. The HCBs induce a warmer Arctic by simultaneously transporting large amounts of moisture and heat. The HCBs excite a tropospheric anticyclonic anomaly near the Arctic Circle, which, in turn, triggers anomalies in the propagation of planetary waves and the meridional circulation, with a subsequent redistribution of momentum and heat. This is accompanied by a weak polar night jet and a poleward shift in the subtropical westerly jet, resulting in mild cold mid‐latitude continents. The second mode represents the AO pattern, which has a different mechanism from WACC. The high‐pressure anomaly over the North Pacific has played an increasingly important part in the WACC mode in recent decades and the WACC pattern with HCBs is more easily reproduced in simulations with human activity. HCBs therefore require further consideration under the current and future conditions of global warming.