{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03278688524590164, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03715846994535519, 'mean_word_length': 5.542857142857143, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Short-term human leucocyte culture micromethod versus the macromethod.

Most macromethods of human short-term phytohemagglutinin stimulated leucocyte cultures are modifications of the procedure reported by Nowell (1960), while the first reports of a micromethod of human leucocyte culture utilizing whole blood inoculum were contributed by Arakaki and Sparkes (1963) and Tips et al. (1963). Little information is available concerning the relative efficiency of both methods. Bishun et al. (1965) and Amato et al. (1970) observed higher mitotic indicies in macrocultures as compared to microcultures (1965). By employing modifications of the macroand micromethods of Mellman (1965) and Hunger ford (1965) respectively, we have found no significant difference between the mean mitotic indicies scored in 33 cultures derived from six normal healthy individuals. As shown below differences did occur inter-individually.