{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.042286609240407204, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012529365700861394, 'mean_word_length': 4.629955947136564, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The effect of resin-based sealers on fracture properties of dentine.

AIM
To determine whether resin-based sealer cements are able to strengthen root dentine, as measured by work of fracture (Wf), micro-punch shear strength (MPSS) and resistance to vertical root fracture (VRF).


METHODOLOGY
One hundred and twenty extracted premolar teeth were randomly assigned amongst four treatments before testing: intact, root canals prepared but unfilled, or root filled using epoxy- or urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based sealer (plus core material). Samples were then prepared for measuring Wf, MPSS or VRF using standard test procedures. Data were analyzed using one-way anova with significance set at P < 0.05.


RESULTS
For all three tests, root canals filled using epoxy resin-based sealer were not statistically significantly different compared with UDMA resin (P = 1 for Wf, P = 0.7 for MPSS and P = 0.12 for VRF), or different from both sound and prepared dentine (P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between sound dentine and prepared dentine for both Wf (P = 0.92) and resistance to VRF (P = 1).


CONCLUSIONS
Neither epoxy nor UDMA resins used as sealer cements enhanced fracture resistance of root dentine when placed within root canals of extracted teeth.