{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.06060606060606061, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04419191919191919, 'mean_word_length': 4.624113475177305, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Routine urine analysis in university candidates: is it worthwhile?

The study aimed to investigate the abnormalities in urine analysis in university candidates. A total of 247 students (150 males, 97 females) (mean age 20.08 years) had a medical check-up including urine analysis. In all, 38 urine samples had abnormalities (one or more abnormality/urinalysis). Pyuria was found in 20 students (8.1%), haematuria in 15 (6.1%), albuminuria in 12 (4.8%) and casts in 9 (3.6%). No glycosuria was found. Bacteria were found in 22 students (8.9%) and yeasts in two (0.8%). Urinalysis is warranted as a routine test in university students because of the percentage of abnormalities found and its importance in disease surveillance. However, it should not be a criterion for refusal by universities.