{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019485038274182326, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.014634146341463, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Design and implementation of clinical trials of antimicrobial drugs and devices used in periodontal disease treatment.

The design and implementation of clinical trials (CTs) carried out to evaluate antimicrobial and anti-infective drugs and devices are one of the most difficult challenges in contemporary periodontal research and product development. The overwhelming amount of evidence which has established a microbial etiology for periodontitis is the basis for developing and testing antimicrobial treatments. Well-designed antimicrobial CTs start with a carefully crafted hypothesis and a protocol which explicitly integrates the requirements of the patient, the clinician, the sponsor, and regulatory authorities. Surrogate variables for effectiveness must be clinically relevant, scientifically sound, and statistically valid. Currently, clinical attachment level measurements and alveolar bone assessments are accepted as proof of effectiveness. Indication and claim support of the antimicrobial product guide the design and implementation of the CT. Adverse microbiologic consequences, such as lack of antimicrobial susceptibility, wrong spectrum, incorrect dosage, non-compliance, and drug interference, must be monitored. Successful CTs balance a large group of variables used to screen, randomize, and assign subjects to experimental and control groups to ensure that prognostic and risk factors are properly accounted for.