{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021806853582554516, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001557632398753894, 'mean_word_length': 5.989130434782608, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
John Locke’s Historical Method and “Natural Histories” in Modern Natural Sciences

Among the many fundamental issues that helped shape the philosophy of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, one concerned the condition of philosophy and scientific knowledge, and in the area of our interest – knowledge about nature.1 These philosophical inquiries included both subject-related problems concerning human cognitive abilities and object-related ones indicating possible epistemological boundaries that nature itself could have generated. Thus, already at the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, from Francis Bacon, Galileo, and