{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012828736369467608, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003207184092366902, 'mean_word_length': 5.842105263157895, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Perceptions of the Value of Extended Assessments to Resolve Allegations of Sexual Abuse: It's the Performance that Counts

ABSTRACT Recently, child welfare researchers and professionals have turned their attention to strategies for resolving challenging allegations of sexual abuse. An extended assessment, usually 4–6 child interviews by a single interviewer, is one such strategy. Using data from an online survey of 932 child maltreatment professionals about the utility of extended assessments, a mixed methods study examined differences in views of professionals who had actually conducted extended assessments and those who had not. Respondents possessing extended assessment experience perceived fewer barriers and viewed a smaller number of types of cases as appropriate for extended assessments. Respondents who had conducted extended assessments were more likely to see extended assessments as beneficial to legal cases whereas those who had not were more likely to see them as a detriment to legal cases. Respondents identified several practical issues that need attention: standards and guidelines related to extended assessments, the need for training and supervision, and clearer definitions of the practice. Practice implications include recognition of a niche for experienced, graduate credentialed practitioners who can conduct extended assessments, forming a rung on a professional development ladder. Findings highlight a need to understand the circumstances under which extended assessments help or hinder child wellbeing and prosecutions.