{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04517543859649123, 'fraction_numerical': 0.032017543859649125, 'mean_word_length': 4.804071246819339, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Prognostic and Predictive Relevance of DNAM-1, SOCS6 and CADH-7 Genes on Chromosome 18q in Colorectal Cancer

Purpose: Chromosome 18q deletion has been described as a negative prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC). The relationship between its supposed negative prognostic influence and the inactivation of candidate tumor suppressors deleted in colorectal cancer, Smad2 and Smad4 has not been definitively established. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the genetic status of three novel putative tumor suppressors, Cadh-7, DNAX accessory molecule-1 (Dnam-1) and suppressor of cytokine signaling (Socs6) on chromosome 18q and to correlate molecular results with patient survival and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Experimental Design: One hundred and ninety representative patient samples from a randomized multicenter study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- based adjuvant chemotherapy were screened for the gene copy status of Cadh-7, Socs6 and Dnam-1 using real-time quantitative PCR assay, and the molecular results were correlated with clinical outcome. Results: Loss of gene copy number was found in 26.8, 37.9 and 54.2% for Cadh-7, Dnam-1 and Socs6, respectively. Only Dnam-1 deletion was an independent negative prognostic factor for the 5-year overall survival (OS) in the untreated group of patients (hazard ratio = 2.44; p = 0.01). On the contrary, loss of Cadh-7 gene copy number was a favourable prognostic factor for disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.43; p = 0.03) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.29; p = 0.01) in the untreated control population. Furthermore and most importantly, patients with Dnam-1 deletion who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower risk of death compared to untreated patients with Dnam-1 deletion (hazard ratio = 0.51; p = 0.05), whereas those with Dnam-1 retention did not derive any benefit from 5-FU-based treatment (hazard ratio = 1.68; p = 0.16). Conclusions: Loss of Dnam-1 gene copy number and retention of Cadh-7 might be indicators of worse prognosis, and Dnam-1 deletion might predict for a beneficial response to adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy in patients with CRC. The confirmation of our findings in large independent randomized studies is needed.