{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022813688212927757, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0028517110266159697, 'mean_word_length': 5.194117647058824, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A COMPARISON OF FPETOOL PREDICTIONS TO EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS : COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENT AND SPRINKLER SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ON IN-CABINET FIRES

Model predictions are widely employed in the assessment of fire hazards, and there is an ongoing need to expand the existing comparisons between fire test data and model predictions to additional fire scenarios. This paper presents a comparison of fire model predictions with experimental results from pre-flashover fire tests conducted in a mockup of typical electronic data processing (EDP) or telecommunications facilities. The zone model FPETool: Fire Simulator was used to predict the results of single room preflashover fire tests. The tests involved the suppression of an in-cabinet fire by a clean agent (e.g., FM-200) system, and by a standard water sprinkler system. With the exception of heat release rates, all inputs were selected without knowledge of the experimental results. Predictions made by FPETool: Fire Simulator are discussed, and the model predictions compared to the experimental data.