{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017080745341614908, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.78421052631579, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Postsurgical Inflammation After Bilateral Cataract Surgery Using Different Intraocular Lenses in Each Eye

According to a recent survey, foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the preferred choice of ophthalmic surgeons for replacing the human crystalline lens. Some advantages of foldable IOLs, including low induced astigmatism and invasiveness, better wound stability, and faster visual rehabilitation, are achieved by a marked reduction in incision size as compared to that required for rigid IOLs made of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Acrylic PMMA, silicone, and hydrogel are among the materials used to fabricate foldable IOLs. Although their efficacy in smallincision cataract surgery has been well documented, no quantitative studies of the postoperative inflammation or blood-aqueous barrier breakdown caused by the different foldable IOL materials have been done. Despite the increasing interest in small-incision cataract surgery using foldable IOLs, we do not know which new IOL material is more advantageous than another in lessening the degree of postoperative inflammation or quickening the process of blood-aqueous barrier reestablishment. We undertook the current study to assess the clinical course after bilateral cataract surgery using different IOLs for either eye.