{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025094696969696968, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015151515151515152, 'mean_word_length': 5.501538461538462, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Importance of previous transurethral resection of the prostate before eerpe.short-term functional outcomes in a single surgeon series.

OBJECTIVES
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) is technically a very demanding procedure and potentially even more challenging in patients with previous transurethral resection (TURP). This study evaluates the impact of previous TURP on the short-term functional outcome of patients undergoing extraperitoneal LRP.


METHODS
Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, comprising a single-surgeon cohort of 155 consecutive LRP cases, 19 of which had previous history of TURP. Demographics, clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated and compared among patients with and without previous TURP. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify potential variables independently associated with continence outcomes. Incontinence was defined as the need of more than 1 pad/day. Potency was defined as the ability for sexual intercourse with or without the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors.


RESULTS
Demographic and clinical variables were comparable among the two study groups. Neurovascular bundle preservation was possible in 26% and 37% of patients with and without previous TURP, respectively. No major complications were recorded and the incidence of minor complications was comparable. Overall continence rate at 3 months was 82,58%, for the entire cohort. Subset analysis demonstrated a 3-month continence rate of 73.7% vs. 83.8% (p>0.05) in patients with and without TURP, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated age, BMI and ASA were variables independently associated with continence outcomes. In the cohort of patients with previous TURP, 2 out of 7 undergoing preservation recovered erections, with a mean follow up of 15.5 months, comparable to the 30% achieved in patients without TURP and nerve sparing procedure.


CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in patients with previous TURP is feasible, with complication rates and short-term functional outcomes comparable to those in patients without previous resection.