{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016260162601626018, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.346704871060172, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY IN CONTEXT EUROPEAN INTEGRATION OF UKRAINE

The necessity and relevance of the study of the experience of formation and implementation of anti-corruption policy in the EU member states in order to implement it in Ukraine, due to its European integration vector of development is substantiated. The essence and causes of corruption depending on the spheres of society, as well as the characteristics of corruption in Ukraine and its impact on the economic and social parameters of the country, resulting in lower living standards. The existing models of perception of corruption in the world and the main strategies of anti-corruption activity are described. It is proved that the choice of strategy and model of anti-corruption activities in each country depends on many factors, and Ukraine's European integration course requires harmonization of national anti-corruption legislation with EU standards. The main causes of corruption in EU member states and features of anti-corruption policy of some European countries are analyzed. It has been shown that corruption is more or less common to almost all EU countries, however, common to all countries in terms of formation and implementation of anti-corruption policy is that it aims to minimize opportunities for corruption offenses. It is established that the basis of the anti-corruption policy of the Scandinavian EU member states is the concept of public administration "Good Governance", which combines institutions, processes and mechanisms through which citizens express their interests and exercise legal rights. It was found that EU countries do not pursue a common anti-corruption policy, and each country develops its own anti-corruption infrastructure, which aims to minimize opportunities for corruption offenses. It is proved that the insufficient effectiveness of the mechanisms of the state anti-corruption policy makes it impossible to carry out structural reforms on the way to full membership of Ukraine in the EU. Priority areas for further formation and implementation of anti-corruption policy in Ukraine have been identified, taking into account European integration aspirations and existing international standards.