{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011904761904761904, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.790322580645161, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Using Ethnographic Methods

The growing need to redefine consent for subjects with disabilities also requires an evolving set of methodologies. Ethnographic methods, combined with the principles of universal design, can provide an advanced starting point for a more sophisticated definition of consent. Such a combination can better accommodate the subtleties of subjectivity that are necessary when studying disability.