{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01601164483260553, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.198198198198198, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Transformation of Agrarian Institutions: An Introduction and Perspective

general usage, the term refers to analyses of the interrelationship of political and economic variables. However, this implies little about the subject or method of study. Practitioners of rational choice often label themselves political economists. So do Marxists and other social scientists investigating long-term or major secular change. Scholars in these last two groups often admit to much in common, but many on the Left continue to perceive a huge gap between theories of rational choice and arguments derived from Marxism. And not a few public choice writers have expressed open hostility to Marxism.