{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015832482124616958, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015321756894790603, 'mean_word_length': 4.645533141210374, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The fate of Rukmini Prasad.


 The case a women who was forced to undergo a tubal ligation in India in 1976 and who recently underwent a reversal operation was described. In 1976 the government of Indira Gandhi carried out a policy of involuntary sterilization. A total of 8.2 million sterilizations were performed during 1976-1977 and many of these were performed under coercion. Although this program was abandoned with the fall of the Gandhi government, it set back family planning in India by making the population suspicious of any government programs aimed at limiting family size. The year before the coercive program was instituted, 2.7 million sterilizations were performed, but in the year following the collapse of the program, only 0.9 million sterilizations were performed. Although Indira Gandhi recently returned to power, it is unlikely that compulsory sterilization policies will be reinstituted. Rukmini Prasad was one of the many women who was forced into accepting a tubal ligation in 1976. Her husband, who worked as a janitor in a government office building, was indirectly threatened with the loss of his job unless he or his wife agreed to accept sterilization. At the time of sterilization, Rukmini Prasad had just given birth to her 2nd son and had a total of 4 children. She was harshly criticised by her family and neighbors for submitting to the operation and to add to her anguish her new son died shortly after the sterilization. Recently she developed a hernia. Since she needed an operation to correct the problem, she decided to have a sterilization reversal performed at the same time. During the operation her doctor discovered that the tubes were cut at the optimum location for successful reversal. The patient was informed that she had a 40% chance of becoming pregnant again. She was pleased to receive this good news but more importantly, she felt that she once again had the respect of her neighbors and her family.
