{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013824884792626729, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0069124423963133645, 'mean_word_length': 4.816964285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Producer’s Liability in Negligence

Although the provisions of Pt I of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposing strict liability for damage caused by defective products are the primary source of tortious liability in the area covered by this work, they are by no means the sole such source. This is principally because of the limitations which have been placed on the scope of the Act. These affect such issues as the persons who are potentially subject to liability, the types of damage or loss covered, and in particular the exclusion of damage to commercial property, the incidence of limitation periods, and the fact that the Act does not apply to products which the defendant supplied before it came into force on 1 March 1988. Moreover, even where the Act is potentially applicable it will often be considered prudent to pursue alternative sources of liability, notably those which arise under the general law of negligence. Certainly, this has been the experience of the position in the United States. Nonetheless, in reading the text which follows it should be remembered that nowadays the Act is the most obvious source of liability in most cases in which it is claimed that a defective product has caused death, personal injury, or damage to what may be broadly termed consumer property.