{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017241379310344827, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3028571428571425, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of the State-of-the-Art Image and Video Quality Assessment Metrics

Today, thanks to the developing technology, changes are experienced in many areas and these changes sometimes bring some problems, issues that need to be solved or improved. In the field of digital image and video processing, the viewer experience has been greatly improved with the development of image and video coding methods and technologies in recent years. However, due to these developments, the importance of video and image quality evaluation techniques has increased. In the field of imaging technology, although the human visual system and human judgment experiments will give us the most accurate results, this rapidly growing field has made human judgment experiments unsuitable with the increasing content. At this point, effective and automatic quality assessment metrics are needed to evaluate and optimize advanced compression technologies in terms of visual perception quality. In this paper, our aim is to compare the performances of some of the new generation image and video quality assessment metrics.