{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020190023752969122, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0023752969121140144, 'mean_word_length': 5.435114503816794, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Action-Structure Paradox in a Strategic Information System Change Process

Any strategic Information System (IS) change process is at risk of a failure because of its inability to evolve as rapidly as the business environment. In this Grounded Theory study, aspects of socio-cognitive inertia arose in a 15-year customer-vendor relationship involving excessive optimism and trust in decisionmaking about technological options, knowledge sharing, and development practices. The pre-existing collaboration model was ultimately not supportive of the targeted strategic IS change. As a result, pressures to change the mode of operating emerged at the critical phase of initial rollout. This paper contributes to the IS change literature by presenting and theorizing an action-structure paradox identified during this study of strategic IS change.