{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021377672209026127, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.435114503816794, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Varieties of Dispute Processing: The Implications on Legal Education

Sander’s prophetic remarks in Varieties of Dispute Processing, along with the work of the other forefathers and foremothers of our field, have shaped dispute resolution reality worldwide on many levels: it has shaped policymaking in the sense that many dispute resolution mechanisms found their way into justice administration, civil and criminal, around the globe; it has brought to the attention of legal education institutions the need to enrich the legal curriculum with knowledge and skills required to function in the newly shaped administration of justice; it equipped the toolbox of legal professionals with much more diverse tools to assist clients; and it shifted the discourse in society about judicial satisfaction from “winning” to “getting what I needed.”...