{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04159802306425041, 'fraction_numerical': 0.039126853377265236, 'mean_word_length': 4.397777777777778, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Phase I study of weekly alternating therapy with irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

The combination of IP (irinotecan/cisplatin) has been shown to confer a survival benefit compared with EP (etoposide/cisplatin) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Based on this and potential synergy from sequential inhibition of topoisomerases I and II, we conducted a phase I study to assess the feasibility of weekly therapy alternating IP and EP. The doses of EP were fixed (etoposide 60 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on day 1). The dose of irinotecan was escalated in serial cohorts at 3 dose levels: 80, 90, and 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given on days 2-5 and days 4-7 after IP and EP, respectively. Patients with limited-stage SCLC received chemoradiation during weeks 4-6 with etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 1-3, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, and thoracic radiation 1.5 Gy twice daily in 30 fractions. Patients received 12 weeks of therapy. To evaluate dose escalation in subsequent cohorts, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was initially assessed during weeks 1-3 of treatment. Characteristics of the 18 patients accrued are as follows: performance status 0/1, n = 9; female sex, n = 9; extended-stage SCLC, n = 16; and median age, 53 years. Four patients treated at irinotecan dose level 1 (80 mg/m2), 6 patients at dose level 2 (90 mg/m2), and 6 patients at dose level 3 (100 mg/m2) did not experience DLT in weeks 1-4 and completed therapy without major incident. The only 2 patients to experience DLT during weeks 1-4 were treated at dose level 2. Both were hospitalized during week 4 and subsequently died. However, patients had already been accrued at dose level 3 and tolerated therapy well. Therefore, the trial design was modified to assess DLT during weeks 1-4, and additional patients were cautiously added to the dose level 2 and 3 cohorts. Analysis of summary toxicity data resulted in a recommendation that dose level 3 be used in phase II based on the probability of DLT of 16% (95% CI, 3%-29%). Responses in 16 evaluable patients include complete response in 1 patient, partial response in 14 patients, and minor response in 1 patient. With the exception of the 2 deaths, the therapy was well tolerated and active. Phase II evaluation of the regimen in patients with extensive-stage SCLC is ongoing.