{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04716981132075472, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03032345013477089, 'mean_word_length': 5.012145748987854, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Efficacy of the InVance™ Male Sling in Treating Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Three-Year Experience from a Single Centre

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the InVance™ male sling in treating stress urinary incontinence. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed operative logs from a single surgeon of 43 patients treated over a 3-year period (Feb. 2004 to Nov. 2006) for stress incontinence by implantation of a male bulbourethral bone-anchoring sling (InVance™). The mean follow-up time was 24.2 months (range 4–38). Radical prostatectomy was the most common cause of incontinence in this group (33/ 43 cases; 76.7%). Efficacy was evaluated objectively in terms of the number of pads used per day, while subjective patient satisfaction was also recorded. We also investigated a possible correlation between preoperative parameters and outcome. Results: Twenty-two patients (51.2%) were cured (totally dry: 30.2%; the remainder: 1 pad per day), while 8 (18.6%) patients improved but still required two pads per day. Overall, 30 of 43 patients (69.6%) were satisfied with the outcome of the operation. Postoperative infection was the most common complication (11.6%). The severity of preoperative incontinence correlated with the outcome of the operation, with mild incontinence giving better results. Conclusions: The bone-anchored male sling is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for mild-to-moderate male urinary incontinence.