{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01795212765957447, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003324468085106383, 'mean_word_length': 4.6367041198501875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Later Roman Constitution

Roman was traditionally also two jugera, the system must also have prevailed at Rome; when property qualifications were adopted for the classes, 2 jugera presumably just qualified a man to be enrolled in the lowest. It was thus the obvious amount to assign to a colonist and I doubt very much whether it was kept so low in order to exclude him from any of the higher classes; if the qualifications for the classes in jugera bore the same relationship to each other as the qualifications in asses, the number of jugera given to a Roman colonist could have been doubled without moving him out of the lowest classis. Salmon disclaims at the outset any intention of dealing with private migration (the serviceable account by A. J. N. Wilson should be cited), reasonably enough, since it would alter the scope of the book; but in omitting any real discussion of agrarian affairs he perhaps narrows his perspective too far. The absence of colonization in the half-century or so before Ti. Gracchus is usually and rightly invoked to help explain the problem which he set out to solve; and whatever is thought about the historicity of the Lex Licinia Sextia de modo agrorum, it is remarkable that it falls in a similar period without colonization (from 383/2 onwards). The link between colonization and emigration is close, as is that between both and agrarian affairs; Professor Salmon has provided us with an admirable account of colonization as a basis for such an investigation.