{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05034324942791762, 'fraction_numerical': 0.036041189931350116, 'mean_word_length': 4.753289473684211, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A possible role for activated protein C resistance in patients with first and second trimester pregnancy failure.

Thrombophilia was recently suggested as a possible factor in recurrent pregnancy losses. We studied prospectively 125 patients (mean age 31.4 +/- 5.6 years) with one or more first or second trimester pregnancy losses for the prevalence of activated protein C resistance (APCR). Proteins C and S antigens, antithrombin III, anticardiolipin, and lupus anti-coagulant were also evaluated. Patients with uterine malformations, hormonal abnormalities, chromosomal translocations and infectious causes were excluded. A control group of 125 women with no past fetal loss were matched with the study group. Whenever the APC-sensitivity ratio (APC-SR) was </=2.2, polymerase chain reaction for factor V mutation (Leiden) was performed. Heterozygosity for the mutation was found in 18 patients (14.4%) compared with seven heterozygous among 125 control group (5. 6%; P < 0.05). Acquired APCR (APC-SR 1.8 and Leiden negative) was revealed in seven patients (5.6%) in the study group and in three of the controls (2.4%; not significant). The rate of preclinical pregnancy losses (17/48) and second trimester miscarriages (10/48) in mutation carriers was significantly higher than in patients with no APCR (25/214) and (14/214) respectively (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01 respectively). Live birth rate was not different between the two groups. Occurrence of APCR with any kind of pregnancy loss calculated per patient, in our study group, was approximately 1/7, 1/4 and 1/5 with one, two and three or more pregnancy losses respectively. These findings suggest that assessment of APCR should be considered in a more extended evaluation of such patients.