{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016556291390728478, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018763796909492272, 'mean_word_length': 4.944262295081967, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Temporal integration in the presence of off-frequency maskers.

Temporal integration was measured at a relatively low and a relatively high signal frequency under conditions of off-frequency masking. The masker was typically gated for 300 ms, and the signal was presented 70 ms after masker onset. In experiment 1, the signal frequency was 500 or 2000 Hz. Temporal integration was measured in quiet and in the presence of a masker whose frequency was lower or higher than the signal frequency. In all listening situations, there was less integration at 2000 Hz than at 500 Hz. This effect of frequency was particularly dramatic in the presence of a lower frequency masker, where there was almost no integration at 2000 Hz. Experiment 2 showed that this dramatic effect of frequency cannot be understood in terms of the underlying psychometric functions. Experiment 3 measured temporal integration at 750 and 2000 Hz for a large number of masker-signal frequency separations for both a tonal and a noise masker, and in conditions where the masker was gated or continuous. The results with the gated tonal masker largely confirmed the results of experiment 1. The results with the continuous tonal masker and the gated or continuous noise masker, however, were quite different. In those cases, the amount of temporal integration at both signal frequencies was more or less independent of the masker-signal separation; the masked temporal integration was nearly equal to the integration in quiet. Thus based on the conditions evaluated here, off-frequency masked temporal integration differs substantially from integration in quiet only for gated tonal maskers located considerably lower in frequency than the signal. It is unclear how to account for this finding, although it may be related to attentional factors.