{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027434842249657063, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01646090534979424, 'mean_word_length': 5.293103448275862, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Why Recognition Is a Struggle: Love and Strife in Hegel’s Early Jena Writings

I mean to show why the so-called struggle for recognition and ensuing master/bondsman dialectic from Hegel’s 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit were conceived as violent, rather than within a pattern of, say, cooperation, friendship, or love. I do so by examining the extant manuscripts, essays, and drafts in which Hegel experimented with different ways of articulating the themes of recognition, intersubjectivity, and mastery/servitude between 1793 and 1806. I show how those topics were first motivated within these early writings, offering an account of the considerations that finally led Hegel to prefer the Phenomenology’s version to previous ones.