{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0237892948173322, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008496176720475786, 'mean_word_length': 4.718446601941747, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Things from the new world in the European dialects

Every new object arriving in a given culture poses the problem of a name. This constant phenomenon throughout human history is resolved either by adopting and adapting the term of the country of origin, or by creating an idiom, learned or popular, using words already in the lexicon of the adopting country. The linguist is particularly interested in the end of the 15th century, when many new products arrived in Europe. Some were completely unknown, while others fit into existing paradigms. All of these items, at the moment of their discovery, were called by their indigenous names, but these names did not necessarily survive. Arveiller (1963) recorded what he called les termes de voyage ("travel words") in literature since 1505. For my part, having studied the names for maize in the European dialectal space for the Atlas Linguarum Europae (ALE), I have sought to understand how, and perhaps why, we have gone from the American names to the various European terms revealed in dialectal studies. I then took up the task of verifying whether the process had been the same for other products hailing from the New World.