{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023537323470073975, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005379959650302623, 'mean_word_length': 5.584070796460177, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sodium Tanshinone IIA sulfonate for acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE
To investigate the efficacy and safety of Sodium tanshinone ⅡA sulfonate (STS) plus the conventional treatment on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients.


METHODS
We searched several electrical databases and hand searched several Chinese medical journals up to January 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing STS plus conventional treatment with conventional treatment were retrieved. Study screening, data extraction, quality assessment, and data analysis were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane standards.


RESULTS
Sixteen trials involving 1383 people were included. The Meta-analysis showed STS combined with conventional treatment was a better treatment option than conventional treatment alone in reducing the risk of mortality, heart failure, arrhythmia and shock. In addition, STS was associated with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD). No significant difference of STS was found on recurrent angina and recurrent AMI. However, the safety of STS remained uncertain for limite data.


CONCLUSION
Compared with conventional treatment alone, STS combined with conventional treatment may provide more benefits for patients with AMI. Due to the fact that the overall quality of all included trials is generally low, further large-scale high quality trials are warranted.