{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022935779816513763, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009174311926605505, 'mean_word_length': 5.032258064516129, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Resultados refractivos en pacientes operados por LASIK versus LASEK con mitomicina C

OBJECTIVE: Evaluating comparatively the refractive results obtained in eyes operated by keratomileusis in situ assisted with laser (LASIK) versus keratomileusis subepithelial assisted with laser plus Mitomycin C (LASEK + MC). METHODS: A prospective, experimental and comparative study was performed in 210 eyes of patients who went to see the specialist to be operated from some refractive defect. A total of 104 eyes were operated by LASIK and 106 by LASEK + MC. In order to compare the results of study, several tests were made before and after surgery. RESULTS: The refractive defects were greater with statistical significance (p< 0,05, for Student's t) for the eyes operated by LASEK + MC. The visual result of the LASEK with MC surgery was better than that of LASIK. Haze was a problem resolved for the LASEK when included Mitomycin C in patients with high myopia, in addition to improvement of quality of life of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The corneal surgery with laser through the LASEK technique plus use of Mitomycin C demonstrated being as reliable as that with LASIK for ametropy correction, since it provides additional advantages that increases the quality of life of patient, with less postoperative risks.