{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026710097719869708, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001954397394136808, 'mean_word_length': 5.826666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Structure-function relationships in Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase allozymes ADH(S), ADH(F) and ADH(UF), and distantly related forms.

Drosophila melanogaster alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), a paradigm for gene-enzyme molecular evolution and natural selection studies, presents three main alleloforms (ADHS, ADHF and ADHUF) differing by one or two substitutions that render different biochemical properties to the allelozymes. A three-dimensional molecular model of the three allozymes was built by homology modeling using as a template the available crystal structure of the orthologous D. lebanonensis ADH, which shares a sequence identity of 82.2%. Comparison between D. lebanonensis and D. melanogaster structures showed that there is almost no amino-acid change near the substrate or coenzyme binding sites and that the hydrophobic active site cavity is strictly conserved. Nevertheless, substitutions are not distributed at random in nonconstricted positions, or located in external loops, but they appear clustered mainly in secondary structure elements. From comparisons between D. melanogaster allozymes and with D. simulans, a very closely related species, a model based on changes in the electrostatic potential distribution is presented to explain their differential behavior. The depth of knowledge on Drosophila ADH genetics and kinetics, together with the recently obtained structural information, could provide a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying molecular evolution and population genetics.