{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017463235294117647, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004595588235294118, 'mean_word_length': 5.3313953488372094, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Prognostic factors in surgical treatment of epiretinal membranes].

BACKGROUND
Macular epiretinal membranes, whether idiopathic or secondary to vitreo-retinal pathology may result in a lowering of central vision and/or metamorphopsia following a distortion of retinal tissue. Although an adequate surgical peeling procedure is known to result in a functional improvement, the criteria for patient selection for such intervention are, as yet not clearly established.


METHODS AND RESULTS
In order to establish prognostic indicators of a good visual recovery, we studied 25 cases of epiretinal membrane. Our results showed an improvement in visual acuity of 2 or more Snellen lines among 34% of our patients, regardless of their initial visual acuity. The duration of symptoms prior to intervention was found to be a prognostic factor whereas the presence of macular edema detected preoperatively on fluorescein angiography had no effect on the final visual outcome.


CONCLUSION
A common post-operative complication came to our attention: secondary opacification of the crystalline lens.