{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01708185053380783, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0028469750889679717, 'mean_word_length': 6.137055837563452, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Implication of pituitary tropic status on tumor development.

Pituitary tumor initiation and progression are associated with a plethora of genetic imbalances. Several genetic abnormalities have been described in pituitary tumors, from mutations in intracellular signaling (constitutive activation adenylyl cyclase) and growth factor pathways (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]) to imbalance in cell cycle regulators (p16, p27, pRb). Unfortunately, most of these observations do not provide validated predictors of clinical behavior or of recurrence. The pituitary gland is notably plastic, and intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli result in profound growth changes ranging from hypoplasia to hyperplasia. The impact of pituitary tropic status on influencing neoplastic potential is difficult to test in human samples because the gland is not readily accessible for ongoing morphological observation. Animal models represent a functional approach to testing this hypothesis, and transgenic mouse models of pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG) inactivation or overexpression support the notion that pituitary tropic status directly correlates with likelihood for pituitary tumor formation. Understanding the mechanisms underlying changes in pituitary plasticity and their relationship to tumor development may contribute to the ability of regulating the development and progression of pituitary tumors.