{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04092920353982301, 'fraction_numerical': 0.027931415929203538, 'mean_word_length': 4.833870967741936, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstract OT1-04-01: A phase IIB pre-surgical trial of oral tamoxifen (TAM) versus transdermal 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) in women with DCIS of the breast

Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is diagnosed in 60,000 women annually in the US. TAM is proven to reduce risk of local recurrence and new primary breast cancer in women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive DCIS. However, acceptance of TAM has been low, primarily because of toxicity related to systemic exposure. Local delivery to the breast is an attractive alternative since low systemic levels could minimize toxicity. 4-OHT is an active metabolite of TAM. When formulated as a gel and applied to the breast skin, it is well tolerated, and results in 4-OHT breast tissue drug levels comparable oral TAM. In small pilot studies, its anti-proliferative effects on invasive breast tumors and DCIS are also similar to oral TAM [Lee O, et al. PMID 25028506]. The goal of our study is to validate these results in preparation for a Phase III trial of 4-OHT gel in comparison to oral TAM. Methods We are conducting a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase IIB pre-surgical trial to demonstrate that daily application of 4-OHT gel will result in a reduction in the Ki-67 labeling index of DCIS lesions that is not inferior to that seen in women receiving daily oral TAM 20 mg daily. Ki-67 of the base-line diagnostic core needle biopsy will be compared to that of the therapeutic surgical excision sample after oral TAM or 4-OHT gel for 8 ± 2 weeks. Secondary endpoints include changes in Oncotype DCIS-Score, IHC markers (CD68, COX2, p16), hormone levels, coagulation markers, drug concentration in the plasma and breast tissue, the fraction of women with no residual DCIS in the surgical sample, and experienced symptoms. 100 women (assuming 20% non-evaluable samples or compliance issues) with DCIS (10% ER-positive) will be enrolled across six institutions into two intervention arms: oral TAM 20 mg daily, placebo gel and 4-OHT gel 4mg daily (2mg/breast), placebo capsule. All participants will be evaluable for toxicity from their first dose. All samples from all participants who receive drug will be evaluated and included in the primary analysis, which will be based on intent to treat principle. To date 15 of 100 participants have been enrolled across six institutions including: Northwestern University in Chicago, IL, St. Elizabeth Healthcare in Edgewood, KY, Duke University Medical Center in Durham, NC, Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, OH, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, NY, and Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Since study open, 69 potential participants have been contacted, 52 did not consent for screening, 17consented for screening, 2 are pending consent, and 15 have started study intervention. The most common reasons potential participants chose not to consent are wanting to schedule surgery as soon as possible, attitudes toward medical research, and current use of a prohibited concomitant medication such as a potent inhibitor of tamoxifen metabolism or exogenous sex steroid. Funding Source: NCI Contract # HHSN2612201200035I. Citation Format: Benante KA, Xu Y, Tull MB, Segura AJ, Alber KM, Kalinichenko K, Hou L, Jovanovic B, Perloff M, Heckman-Stoddard B, Dimond E, Khan SA. A phase IIB pre-surgical trial of oral tamoxifen (TAM) versus transdermal 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) in women with DCIS of the breast [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-01.