{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012281835811247576, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.910714285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Post-War Development Analysis of Political Science: from Behaviorism to New Institutionalism: Political Science Development Trend, Challenges and Suggestions

: The research on political system and the scientific development of discipline are of great significance to political science. Behaviorism after World War II is a research paradigm based on the rebellion against traditional political science and the adaptation to the needs of practical development, and then the new institutionalism is a political research paradigm emerging as the inheritance of traditional institutional research and the criticism of behaviorism. Both of them have great academic contributions but also have certain drawbacks. Through the analysis of the development of behaviorism and new institutionalism in political science after World War II, this paper attempts to summarize the development trend of political science since World War II, and analyzes the challenges faced by political science. Finally, it attempts to put forward corresponding disciplinary suggestions for the further scientific and vigorous development of political science. Abstract the common reasons from the particularity of political systems in different countries. Some scholars believe that the new institutionalism plays a role of bridge intermediary in political science, which connects the macro and micro of political science, as well as the interdisciplinary relationship between politics and various disciplines, thus helping to abstract commonness from different particularities.