{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017615176151761516, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0013550135501355014, 'mean_word_length': 5.506607929515418, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Instrumented individuals are not representative of the population. Survival of wolverines with and without GPS collars

Results from biologging studies are often scaled up to population-level inferences and this begs the question: Are instrumented animals representative of the population given the potential bias in individual selectivity, the influence of capture, handling and wearing bio-loggers? The answer is elusive due to the challenges of obtaining comparable data from individuals without bio-loggers. Using non-invasive genetic data of a large carnivore, the wolverine (Gulo gulo) in Scandinavia, and an open-population spatial capture-recapture model, we were able to estimate and compare survival rates of individuals fitted with GPS collars versus individuals that had never been captured and collared. We found that mortality of GPS collared individuals was 47% lower compared to individuals without GPS collars. While instrumented and non-instrumented wolverines had similar risks of dying from legal culling, GPS collared individuals displayed lower mortality rates due to causes other than legal culling. Reports of positive effects of biologging on the fitness of individuals are rather uncommon and we argue that the most likely explanation is that GPS-collars could shield animals from poaching. Our results highlight the challenges of drawing population level inferences for large carnivores when using data from an instrumented sample of the population.