{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03986135181975736, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03726169844020797, 'mean_word_length': 5.274456521739131, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears: comparison of multidetector CT arthrography and 1.5-T MR arthrography.

PURPOSE
To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. CT and MR arthrographic images prospectively obtained in 56 consecutive patients, following the same arthrographic procedure, were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CT and MR arthrography were compared by using the McNemar test. Interobserver and intertechnique agreement for detecting rotator cuff lesions were measured and compared with κ and Z statistics. The Bland-Altman method was used to determine interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring tendon tears. For grading fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, κ and Z statistics were used.


RESULTS
There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT arthrography and MR arthrography in depiction of rotator cuff lesions. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were 92% and 93%-97% for the supraspinatus, 100% and 77%-79% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 85%-90% for the subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon. The respective sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography were 96% and 83%-93% for the supraspinatus, 88%-100% and 81%-83% for the infraspinatus, 75%-88% and 90%-100% for the subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.744-0.964 for CT arthrography; κ = 0.641-0.893 for MR arthrography), and intertechnique agreement was almost perfect (κ > 0.819). CT and MR arthrography both yielded moderate interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring rotator cuff tears and grading muscle fatty infiltration.


CONCLUSION
Data suggest that CT and MR arthrography have similar diagnostic performance for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears.