{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014890282131661442, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.616580310880829, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Official clarification of normative legal acts: the experience of the EAEU countries and gaps in legal regulation of the Republic of Kazakhstan

The official clarification of regulatory legal acts is a key stage in the implementation of the provisions and norms of national legislation. Legal regulations cannot provide for all the nuances of life circumstances, which are always more complicated than legal standards. In these circumstances, the respective subjects of legal relations are assisted by such institution as interpretation (clarification) of legal norms, filling in gaps by analogy, which also cannot be implemented without an appropriate interpretation of the rules of law. At the same time, the optimal legal consolidation of such activities in national legislation is of great importance, providing effective legal regulation of the content and procedure for clarifying regulatory legal acts. This paper shows the system of clarification of legal regulations in the Republic of Kazakhstan and the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter-the EAEU), identifies the problems of legislative regulation of this type of activity, suggests measures to improve the legal mechanism for the official interpretation of regulatory legal acts, including laws