{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027080581241743725, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008586525759577279, 'mean_word_length': 5.419491525423729, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Surface Characteristics of Bioactive Glass-Infiltrated Zirconia with Different Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Conditions.

The purpose of this study was to examine the surface characteristics of bioactive glass-infiltrated zirconia specimens that underwent different hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching conditions. Specimens were classified into the following six groups: Zirconia, Zirliner, Porcelain, Bioactive glass A1, Bioactive glass A2, and Bioactive glass A3. Zirliner and porcelain were applied to fully sintered zirconia followed by heat treatment. Bioactive glass was infiltrated into presintered zirconia using a spin coating method followed by complete sintering. All the specimens were acid-etched with 10% or 20% HF, and surface roughness was measured using a profiler. The surface roughness of the zirconia group was not affected by the etching time or the concentration of the acid. The roughness of the three bioactive glass groups (A1, A2, and A3) was slightly increased up until 10 minutes of etching. After 1 hour of etching, the roughness was considerably increased. The infiltrated bioactive glass and acid etching did not affect the adhesion and proliferation of osteoblasts. This study confirmed that surface roughness was affected by the infiltration material, etching time, and acid concentration. For implant surfaces, it is expected that the use of etched bioactive glass-infiltrated zirconia with micro-topographies will be similar to that of machined or sand-blasted/acid-etched (SLA) titanium.