{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023176550783912748, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00954328561690525, 'mean_word_length': 5.9245283018867925, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Dielectrophoretic field‐flow fractionation of electroporated cells

We describe the development and testing of a setup that allows for DEP field‐flow fractionation (DEP‐FFF) of irreversibly electroporated, reversibly electroporated, and nonelectroporated cells based on their different polarizabilities. We first optimized the channel and electrode dimensions, flow rate, and electric field parameters for efficient DEP‐FFF separation of moderately heat‐treated CHO cells (50°C for 15 min) from untreated ones, with the former used as a uniform and stable model of electroporated cells. We then used CHO cells exposed to electric field pulses with amplitudes from 1200 to 2800 V/cm, yielding six groups containing various fractions of nonporated, reversibly porated, and irreversibly porated cells, testing their fractionation in the chamber. DEP‐FFF at 65 kHz resulted in distinctive flow rates for nonporated and each of the porated cell groups. At lower frequencies, the efficiency of fractionation deteriorated, while at higher frequencies the separation of individual elution profiles was further improved, but at the cost of cell flow rate slowdown in all the cell groups, implying undesired transition from negative into positive DEP, where the cells are pulled toward the electrodes. Our results demonstrate that fractionation of irreversibly electroporated, reversibly electroporated, and nonelectroporated cells is feasible at a properly selected frequency.