{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03676470588235294, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003676470588235294, 'mean_word_length': 5.411764705882353, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Research design in Homoeopathy: A perspective

As much we are talking about the evidence-based medicine and in the quest to answer the scientificity of Homoeopathy, much focus is being laid on conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which are considered the gold standard of evidence. However, time and again, conclusion of these RCTs is compromised and debated.[1] Further, a meta-analysis conducted using these RCTs is also criticised for ‘cherry-picking’ of studies, disputed selection criteria and purposeful exclusion of studies.[2]