{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025167785234899327, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.97, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstracts of Articles Appearing in This Issue

Most comparative age analysis of membership in voluntary associations fails to explicitly recognize that many kinds of associations are simply not relevant to the older person. Inclusion of groups whose membership is based, for example, on the presence of children in the household (e.g., P.T.A. groups), should not be included in typologies whose function is to assess life cycle variations in overall membership -especially when average membership across types is used in comparing age groups. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to present