{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028017241379310345, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003232758620689655, 'mean_word_length': 5.23489932885906, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An Analysis of Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation of the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II/III in Child Custody Evaluations

ABSTRACT A survey of experienced psychologists was conducted to analyze the procedures used in administering, scoring, and interpreting the MMPI-2 and MCMI-II/III in child custody evaluations. Findings revealed some major concerns, such as over-reliance on computer-generated interpretive reports, lack of knowledge about base rate cut-offs for interpreting the MCMI-II/III, and a failure to consider available MMPI-2 context specific normative data for child custody litigants. Also, a smaller group of psychologists hand scored the protocols or failed to verify computer keypad data entry, and allowed examinees to take the test in the lobby. The rationales underlying these concerns are outlined, along with the need for psychologists to adhere closely to professional and ethical standards in this regard.