{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03394433129667346, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014256619144602852, 'mean_word_length': 5.065843621399177, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of human triceps surae H-reflexes obtained from mid and distal recording sites.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a distal triceps surae recording site produced H-reflex responses similar to those obtained from the conventional soleus location in 10 healthy subjects at rest. H-reflex and M-response recruitment profiles were generated and the peak-to-peak amplitudes were measured from the two sites simultaneously. Following this, an H-reflex control signal was determined (peak-to-peak amplitude approximately equal to 30% Mmax) and 4 series of 10 trials were recorded at 5 minute intervals. A paired t-test showed non-significant (p greater than 0.05) differences in Hmax, Mmax, and Hmax: Mmax values recorded from the two sites. Linear regression analyses of recruitment profile H-reflexes and M-responses, obtained simultaneously from the two recording sites showed strong correlations (r greater than 0.90, p less than 0.001). To assess the stability of the reflex over time, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were computed for each recording site (R = 0.99 in both instances). Thus the distal recording site, just proximal to the flare of the medial malleolus, is an acceptable alternative to the conventional recording location. This permits recording H-reflex amplitude changes, resulting from the application of a therapeutic intervention to the calf muscles, without having to remove and reposition the recording electrodes.