{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.039461883408071746, 'fraction_numerical': 0.036771300448430494, 'mean_word_length': 4.6938775510204085, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Nasal CPAP after coronary artery surgery

Two groups of 14 patients were compared after coronary artery bypass surgery where the left internal mammary artery had been used as a conduit. One group received nasal continuous positive airway pressure for 1 h, the other group acted as a control. Mean pulmonary shunt fraction was 16.3% before, 12.6% during and 15.7% after continuous positive airways pressure. In the control group the shunt fraction fell from 17.3% to 16.8%. The reduction in shunt fraction was significantly greater with nasal continuous positive airways pressure than in the control group (p = 0.016). There was a significant reduction (p = 0.025) in respiratory rate from 18.3 to 16.7 breath.min–1 during continuous positive airway pressure. Other measured cardiorespiratory variables did not differ significantly between the groups. Visual analogue scores showed no significant difference in chest pain or mask comfort between the groups. The ease of breathing score was, however, significantly better in the continuous positive airways pressure group, 7.5 (SD 1.8) cm and control 5.6 (SD 2.6) cm.