{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021111111111111112, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0022222222222222222, 'mean_word_length': 4.927631578947368, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Spiritual Alternative to the Floundering Biological Perspective for Mental Disorders and Life: A Life-After-Life Perspective

Previous work by the author has introduced the somewhat novel notion that science’s molecular-only vision of life is easily rebutted via some accepted, albeit exceptional behaviors [1,2]. The larger point made in those works is that the general problem facing the scientific model is with regards to the general expectations placed on DNA as a vehicle for inheritance. For over a decade I have pointed this out and that message has stayed aligned with the unfolding missing heritability problem. It should be increasingly clear to people doing (personal) genetic-related research that the venerated DNA model is in serious trouble. The era of immense faith in DNA as the language of life, and also as a vehicle for enormous hype and confidence, should be drawing to a close.