{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03642384105960265, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02847682119205298, 'mean_word_length': 5.4297872340425535, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of Diversity and Inclusion Presence Amongst United States Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Program Websites.

ABSTRACT
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of diversity and inclusion promotion amongst United States (US) Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) residency program websites. A list of PM&R residency programs was obtained from the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA). The program website links were obtained from FREIDA or Google. 2 reviewers evaluated the presence of 11 predetermined diversity and inclusion metrics. The presence of individual resident and faculty photos and biographies were also evaluated. Cross-sectional and descriptive analysis were performed. A total of 90 PM&R residency program websites were reviewed. Only 15 (17%) websites met at least 1 of the 11 predetermined criteria. 9 websites (10%) mentioned diversity in their program mission statement, 7 (8%) included a separate diversity statement. 8 websites (9%) had a dedicated diversity page/section. Of websites that included information on their residents and faculty, 62 (85%) had completed 100% of resident photos vs 41 (47%) for that of faculty photos. 30 websites (41%) had completed 100% of resident biographies vs 15 (17%) for that of faculty biographies. Less than 20% of all residency program websites promoted diversity and inclusion. Residency websites lack key information prospective applicants utilize to evaluate diversity.