{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01499348109517601, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.290983606557377, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Imminent Fall: Cultural Politics and the Downfall of Nizam's Dominions

This article contests the argument that the rise of sub-regionalism, and hoisting linguistic nationalism by the dominant communities—religious, linguistic—was the primary reason for dissolution of the Nizam's Dominions as often claimed. However, such perceptive developments instead fashioned the communitarian and communal blocs fitting against each other and pushed the region to a threshold of communal frenzy. It was for this reason that the nationalist agenda of independence for princely states did not develop sufficiently to challenge the Asafia State of Nizams. On the other hand, the movements that developed in rural areas by the lower class militancy engaged the state in armed clashes, shaking its foundations and paving the way for its fall. The militant masses seized control of the villages in certain districts, driving out the landlord supporters of the regime but did not politically manoeuvre the events in their favour, and their leadership was slowly drawn into the linguistic agenda that primarily caused a smooth transition for the reorganization of the region on linguistic basis. Since we do not have serious academic works on the subject—and to view things from a perspective that is different from the ready-made political frames that have been in currency till today—this work therefore intends to unravel the actual limitations of the regional, religious and caste combines that threw hammer in the process for a political gain.