{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014193548387096775, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0012903225806451613, 'mean_word_length': 5.6, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty.

Diminution of elbow function may be both embarrassing and severely disabling, especially in patients with multiple arthritic joints. Over the past century, multiple techniques of soft tissue reconstruction of the elbow have been advocated. In general, they do not compare well with total elbow arthroplasty. Arthrolysis has often resulted in little improvement of elbow motion and interposition arthroplasty to instability. Synovectomy may however offer satisfactory relief of disability for the rheumatoid elbow provided that initially there is little evidence of joint destruction. The major problem with rigidly linked total elbow arthroplasty has been a high incidence of prosthetic loosening. Biomechanical analysis has shown that high moments tend to disrupt the osseousmethacrylate junction in the humoral medulary canal. Development of a semi-constrained total elbow prosthesis transfers the developed stress to the collateral soft tissues and reduces prosthetic loosening to approximately 3 per cent. This is about one-tenth of the incidence of loosening of the hinge type arthroplasty. This reduction in prosthetic loosening has been coupled with excellent gains in flexion and estension. However, improvement in forearm rotation has not been predictable, especially in elbows exhibiting preoperative fusion or fibrous ankylosis. Though the semi-counstrained total elbow has only been generally available for 3 years, a review of these results justifies its continued use for elbow reconstruction.