{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026446280991735537, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01487603305785124, 'mean_word_length': 4.663551401869159, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Framework for Fettering

1. The fact that no discretion goes unchecked by the law has been clear since the decision of the House of Lords in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997, where Lord Reid rejected “the unreasonable proposition that it must be all or nothing – either no discretion at all or an unfettered discretion”. Lord Denning MR rightly noted that the decision was a “landmark in modern administrative law”.1 But if a decision-maker does not have untrammelled discretion, nor can a decision-maker adopt a rigid policy governing the exercise of the discretion.