{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017328519855595668, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001444043321299639, 'mean_word_length': 5.663461538461538, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
What's in the Pipeline about Bladder Reconstructive Surgery? Some Remarks on the State of the Art

The fusion of engineering with cell biology and advances in biomaterials may lead to de novo construction of implantable organs. Engineering of neobladder from autologous urothelial and smooth muscle cells cultured on biocompatible, either synthetic or naturally-derived substrates, is now feasible in preclinical studies and may have clinical applicability in the near future. The development of a bioartificial bladder would warrant the prevention of both the metabolic and neoplastic shortcomings of the intestinal neobladder. Two tissue-engineering techniques for bladder reconstruction have been tested on animals: 1) the in vivo technique involves the use of naturally-derived biomaterials for functional native bladder regeneration 2) the in vitro technique involves the establishment of autologous urothelial and smooth muscle cell culture from the host's urinary tract, after which the cells are seeded on the biodegradable matrix-scaffold to create a composite graft that is implanted into the same host for complete histotectonic regeneration. Waiting for the creation of a complete tissue-engineered bladder with a trigone-shaped base, we suggest, in surgical oncology after radical cystectomy, the realization of conduit or continent pouch using tissue-engineered material.