{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022517911975435005, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0040941658137154556, 'mean_word_length': 4.6531791907514455, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Law: A Personal View.

I would like to say much more about Sofaer's book if space permitted. As Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. emphasizes in his perceptive introduction, one conclusion stands out: the ambiguities of the Constitution, especially the mixing and overlapping of powers, "were the result not of confusion or fatigue on the part of the Convention but of an intentional design to insure balance among the branches by enabling them to act on the same questions." The ambiguities remain. And the balance the framers had in mind is hard to achieve. Those of us who are eager to see a greater degree of teamwork between the two branches of government would like to have Sofaer's recommendations on the restoration of a satisfactory balance for the 1970's. This is an excellent volume, exceptionally well written with extensive use of source materials. It is clearly an outstanding introduction to the ABA series. We await the two succeeding volumes with a good deal of interest.