{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02912621359223301, 'fraction_numerical': 0.027739251040221916, 'mean_word_length': 5.016666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A diacritic range for phonation types

As described in a recently published account (Ball 1988), there do not at present exist more than a few diacritics to denote different phonatory settings. Ball (1988) suggests a possible set of such diacritics necessary for the transcription of both normal and disordered speech, and these are repeated here for the interest and reaction of other phoneticians, and as part of the lead-up to the revision of the I PA reported in Ladefoged (1987). Following Catford (1977), phonation is described here in terms of two parameters: stricture type and stricture location. For type we have four single strictures and four combined strictures (for descriptions of these, see Catford 1977):