{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013570822731128074, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.020408163265306, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Autopsies as an important indicator for quality control].

The decreasing number of autopsies, in the Netherlands as well, is deplorable because with it an important instrument of medical quality control is likely to disappear. For this not only the relatives, but also the attending physicians and the pathologists are to blame. To turn the tide we need some drastic changes in our attitude towards autopsies. The families should known that an autopsy is a right they have in order to check the quality of diagnosis and treatment of their beloved, it is not a favour towards the physician. A physician who does not see a reason for autopsy, should explain that to the family. Pathologists should think about and realize a subspecialty of autopsy pathology with a thorough training in pathophysiology and intensive care medicine. Autopsy reports should be of the highest quality and reach the physician within a few weeks. A required autopsy percentage should be introduced into the certification process of medical specialists and hospitals and the possibility of Continuous Medical Education credit points for physicians with a certain autopsy percentage should be considered.