{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04220183486238532, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05412844036697248, 'mean_word_length': 4.538071065989848, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A method of estimating the Moho density contrast with a tentative application of EGM08 and CRUST2.0

Based on Vening Meinez-Moritz global inverse isostatic problem, the Moho density contrast is formulated as that of finding a solution of a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind. We present solutions to this equation by combining global models of gravity (EGM08), topography (DTM2006) and seismic crust (CRUST2.0) to a resolution of 2°×2°. The test computations yielded Moho density contrasts ranging from 81.5 kg/m3 (in Pacific) to 988 kg/m3 (Tibet), with averages of 678 ± 78 and 334 ± 108 kg/m3 for continental and oceanic regions, respectively, and a global average of 448 ± 187 kg/m3. Estimated Moho depths range from 8 to 75 km with continental and oceanic averages of 36.6 ± 5.3 km and 12.9 ± 5.8 km, respectively, and a global average of 21 ± 12.5 km.This article has its emphasis on the new theory, while significant corrections to computational results are expected in a forthcoming study, where the isostatic gravity anomaly will be reduced for several disturbing signals.