{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02107481559536354, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006322444678609062, 'mean_word_length': 5.597222222222222, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Attitudes towards intergenerational equity: Preliminary Australian evidence

Introduction Australia is facing the distinct possibility that future generations could have worse lifelong economic prospects than their parents’ generation now entering later life. Over the postwar era, ongoing economic improvements largely benefited people at young to middle ages at the time, with older people being relatively disadvantaged by their cohort of birth (e.g. during the Depression) as well as health and income declines in later life. However, the post-WWII baby boom cohort now entering later life includes many who accumulated substantial wealth and other resources from favourable employment and housing markets notably in the 1980s. There is growing evidence that these opportunities have been relatively less available to very old people today (the pre-WWII birth cohort) and also to younger generations entering adulthood over recent decades [1–3].