{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02631578947368421, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.161904761904762, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Textbooks Are Too Damn High: Calling for a More Nuanced Evaluation of OERs

Abstract:As a response to rising textbook costs, the emergence of Open Educational Resources (OERs) has been welcomed by many institutions, teachers, and students. OERs are a free alternative to the traditional textbook, one that promises both access and equity. However, without care, the implementation of OERs can complicate or even worsen the problem they are meant to solve. In particular, the current and consistent lack of appropriate pedagogical framing and relevant faculty support can actually render OERs a barrier, rather than a boon, to student success.