{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.051590713671539126, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.0120481927710845, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The functional architecture of adaptive cognitive systems with limited capacity

ion (like 'regular polyhedral' or 'fractal'), a theoretical construct (like 'gravitational field' or 'quark'), an idealization (like 'point-mass' or 'ideal gas'), an aggregate (like 'biological species' or 'social group'), or a process (like 'beta-decay' or 'modernization'). Allocation of internal representations onto sensory inputs is achieved in the course of a sequence of computational processes involving procedures of pattern matching between 'transducer' outputs flowing 'bottom-up' and meaningful information flowing 'top-down', thereby being transformed, not necessarily in a single step, into a physical symbol system fit to be matched with the upflowing physical input. Whereas the process of transduction might be governed entirely by physical (and of course chemical and biological) laws, the informational downflow is to some (possibly large) extent molded by conscious cognitive processes like expectational, attentional, and intentional activities — although lower levels certainly are cognitively penetrable to a lesser degree the more 'physical' they become. The