{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011834319526627219, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0019723865877712033, 'mean_word_length': 4.7727272727272725, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Response to laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception using a biological mesh

We read with interest the article by Albayati et al published recently.1 There is a sparsity of long term data in use of biological mesh in laparoscopy rectopexy for the treatment of rectal prolapse. We appreciate the efforts made by Albayati et al in this study and note the homogeneous population in terms of gender, age and BMI. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.