{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02813127930341594, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01406563965170797, 'mean_word_length': 4.724137931034483, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Independent assessment of a new pedicle probe and its ability to detect pedicle breach: a cadaveric study.

OBJECT
The authors undertook an independent, non-industry funded cadaveric study to evaluate the efficacy of a pedicle-probing device, which uses impedance measurement to warn of impending and actual pedicle screw breach.


METHODS
A previously validated fresh-frozen cadaver model (saline-soaked spine) was used. Individuals at 3 levels of training (attending spine surgeon, orthopedic surgery resident, and medical student) used a cannulated pedicle-probing device to cannulate each of the levels between T-2 and S-1. Each pedicle was cannulated freehand using 2 approaches: 1) a standard trajectory through the middle of the pedicle, and 2) a medial trajectory aimed to breach the medial wall of the pedicle. A 16-slice helical CT scanner was used. The images were interpreted and analyzed by 2 orthopedic spine surgeons and a neuroradiologist.


RESULTS
The sensitivity of the pedicle probe to detect impending breach or breach of 4 mm or less was 90.06%. The sensitivity in detecting medial wall breach was 95.8%. The positive predictive value was 87.1%. The device detected medial breach more often than lateral breach.


CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that this pedicle-probing device could reasonably be used to detect impending breach and actual breach of 4 mm or less. Medial breach was detected better than lateral breach. Use of the pedicle probe may improve patient safety.