{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024832855778414518, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.60427807486631, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Earliest Advocates of the English Bible: The Texts of the Medieval Debate (review)

in the letters. I am not a fan of numbering letters, nor am I partial to the recent trend of identifying the archival folder number (archives are reorganized). But these decisions do not impair my enthusiasm for this edition. Every element in describing the code of the letter has been handled with care, and nothing is intrusive to the pleasure of reading the letter. The Pound scholar, the student of modernist literature, the historian of economic ideas, and the casual browser of a library’s shelves (if it is not too quickly relegated to the mysterious realm of “off-site”) will find these letters informative and engaging. When I returned several of my volumes of Pound’s correspondence back to the shelf, I wished all of them could be redone with an eye to what has been achieved in this volume. Miranda B. Hickman has set a standard for editing Pound which future editors of his correspondence must live up to. Edward Burns William Paterson University