{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03801945181255526, 'fraction_numerical': 0.042440318302387266, 'mean_word_length': 5.086021505376344, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Tensile fatigue behavior and crack growth in GdBa2Cu3O7−x/stainless-steel coated conductor grown via reactive co-evaporation

(RE)Ba2Cu3O7−x (REBCO) conductors have the potential to enable a wide range of superconducting applications over a range of temperatures and magnetic fields (Vincent et al 2013 IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23 5700805), yet AC applications and devices with a charge/discharge cycle may be limited by the conductor fatigue properties. Here the fatigue behavior of GdBa2Cu3O7−x (GdBCO) conductors grown by reactive co-evaporation on stainless-steel substrates is reported for axial tensile strains, ε, up to 0.5% and 100 000 cycles. Failure mechanisms are investigated via microstructural studies and compared with a commercially available IBAD/MOCVD REBCO conductor. Results show that GdBCO/stainless-steel conductors retain their transport critical current for 10 000 cycles at ε = 0.35% and ε = 0.45%, and for 1000 cycles at ε = 0.50%. The main cause of fatigue degradation in GdBCO conductors is crack propagation and delamination that initiates at the edge of the conductor due to manufacturing defects.