{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02348993288590604, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003355704697986577, 'mean_word_length': 5.172413793103448, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Heresy and Error in the Assessment of Modern Philosophical Psychology

This chapter tackles three issues: (1) how was Catholic psychological
 orthodoxy set in a battle against pagan philosophies and heterodox
 Christian doctrine in antiquity and the Middle Ages; (2) how was it reset
 in early modern times in the battle against the ‘re-born’ heresies; (3)
 how did censors reply to the conflation of scholastic psychology with
 new philosophical and scientific findings? After the Council of Trent,
 the Roman Catholic Church launched a campaign against early modern
 alternatives to or criticisms of the scholastic building of learning, including
 its psychological section. Although Catholic censors assumed orthodox
 truth claims over or against non-scholastic views, there were also processes
 of mutual interaction, adaptation, and framing between the Church and
 early modern psychology.