{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01951219512195122, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0013937282229965157, 'mean_word_length': 5.617511520737327, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Conflicting contraceptive norms for men: equal responsibility versus women’s bodily autonomy

Abstract Most research investigating how men and women in heterosexual relationships negotiate contraceptive use focuses on the women’s point of view. Using a sample of 44 interviews with men attending a western US university, this study examines norms governing men’s participation in contraceptive use and pregnancy prevention and their responses to those norms. The paper demonstrates how competing norms around sexual health decision-making and women’s bodily autonomy contribute to unintended outcomes that undermine young people’s quest for egalitarian sexual relationships. While men largely agree that responsibility for sexual health decision-making should be shared with women, they also believe that women should have power over their own bodies and sexual health. However, the coexistence of these two competing norms – which call for both equal responsibility in decision-making and women’s bodily autonomy – results in a disconnect between men saying that sexual health decision-making should be equal, but not always participating equally. Thus, men largely give contraceptive decision-making power over to women, putting the burden of pregnancy prevention onto women and letting men off the hook. It is concluded that men’s negotiation of these competing norms reinforces unequal power and inequality in sexual relationships.