{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008896797153024912, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008896797153024912, 'mean_word_length': 5.325842696629214, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Bibliography of Primary and Secondary Works

Scholars have long recognized the significance of Chinese historical records for the study of early Southeast Asian history.2 However, these records have heretofore been of only limited use because specific sources relevant to Southeast Asia lie scattered among such a great mass and variety of other materials as to be extremely difficult to locate. To address this problem, Japanese and Chinese scholars in the early 1900s began compiling Chinese historical works. For several decades these efforts were tentative