{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022964509394572025, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.5963302752293576, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Artifacts caused by cell microinjection.

The effects of microinjection on Rana pipiens oocytes were determined using cryomicrodissection to measure Na, K, water, and injected radiolabeled sucrose (in gelatin) in the nucleus, animal, and vegetal ooplasm and injected bolus (reference phase, RP). The results point to potential problems in the interpretation of microinjection experiments. When oocytes were injected and incubated in Ringer's solution, nucleus, ooplasm, and RP lost K and sucrose and gained Na. Patterns of loss and gain were complex but were consistent with continuous solute leakage at the injection site causing artifactual intracellular diffusion gradients. In spite of leakage, oocytes completed scheduled meiotic maturation when exposed to progesterone. When oocytes were microinjected and incubated in paraffin oil (a medium in which polar solutes cannot exchange), nuclear and ooplasmic Na, K, and water concentrations remained identical to those in uninjected cells. Neither microinjection per se nor the injected bolus affected intraoocytic solute distributions. These findings imply that, after microinjection in aqueous media, metabolites are lost from and redistribute in cells, and that these artifactual changes are inadequately reflected in the ability of the cell to carry out a complex process. They also show that injection artifacts can be avoided by injecting and incubating cells under paraffin oil.