{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03286189683860233, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005407653910149751, 'mean_word_length': 5.027568922305765, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Mechanisms of modulation gap detection.

It has been postulated that the central auditory system contains an array of modulation filters, each responsive to a different range of modulation frequencies present at the outputs of the (peripheral) auditory filters. In the present experiments, we tested what we call the "dip hypothesis," that a gap in modulation is detected using the "dip" in the output of the modulation filter tuned to the modulator frequency. In experiment 1, the task was to detect a gap in the sinusoidal amplitude modulation imposed on a 4-kHz carrier. The modulator preceding the gap ended with a positive-going zero-crossing. There were three conditions, differing in the phase at which the modulator started at the end of the gap; zero-phase, at a positive-going zero-crossing; pi-phase, at a negative-going zero-crossing; and "preserved" phase, at the phase the modulator would have had if it had continued without interruption. Modulation frequencies were 5, 10, 20, and 40 Hz. Psychometric functions for detection of the gap were measured using a two-alternative forced-choice task. For the zero-phase and preserved-phase conditions, the detectability index, d', increased monotonically with increasing gap duration. For the pi-phase condition, performance was good (d' > 1) for small gap durations, and initially worsened with increasing gap duration, before improving again for longer gap durations. This is the pattern of results expected from the dip hypothesis, provided that the modulation filters have Q values of 2 or more. However, it is also possible that a rhythm cue was used to improve performance in the pi-phase condition for short gap durations; the introduction of the gap markedly disrupted the regular rhythm produced by the modulator peaks. In experiment 2, the rhythm cue was disrupted by varying the modulator period randomly around its nominal value, except for the modulator periods immediately before and after the gap. This markedly impaired performance, and resulted in psychometric functions that were very similar for the zero-phase and pi-phase conditions. This pattern of results is inconsistent with the dip hypothesis. For both experiments, modulation gap "thresholds" (d' approximately 1) were roughly constant when expressed as a proportion of the modulator period. Possible mechanisms of modulation gap detection are discussed and evaluated.