{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04465334900117509, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0023501762632197414, 'mean_word_length': 4.756756756756757, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pandora's Box Revisited: A Review Article

"IflpI ro r4Uxjs/ a-1 r S e Ital 'rcv TZ&n v ardi ....:" Aristotle's first eight words opened Pandora's box by dividing literary critics into two hostile camps: genre critics (Aristotelian and otherwise) and their opponents who would speak of "poetry itself," rejecting "its kinds" as inherently destructive of the unique qualities of the literary object. The movements in philosophical method which we associate with Kant and Croce coincided with trends in literary criticism that de-emphasized, denigrated, and all but destroyed the idea of genre-cast it off the throne it had occupied during the Neoclassical period and, indeed, since the Middle Ages, and put it into the doghouse. The hegemony of the Romantic, the neo-Kantian, and the "New" critics has lasted long and is only now beginning to dissolve.