{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03262642740619902, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020391517128874388, 'mean_word_length': 5.104477611940299, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Extramural cancer deposits without nodal structure in colorectal cancer: optimal categorization for prognostic staging.

To establish an optimal categorization of cancer deposits without lymph node structure (extranodal cancer deposits [EX]) in a prognostic staging system, we analyzed 1,027 cases in which patients underwent potentially curative surgery for advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. EX was classified as vascular invasion-type (VAS) or non-VAS.A total of 512 foci of EX were identified in 205 patients (20.0%), with VAS and non-VAS found in 68 and 182 patients, respectively. The hazard ratio for patients with nodal involvement was 3.6 and for patients with VAS and non-VAS, 2.5 and 4.7, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis of these 3 parameters, only nodal involvement and non-VAS were significant prognosticators. By using the Akaike information criterion, N staging was capable of predicting survival outcome with the highest accuracy when both nodal involvement and non-VAS were treated together as an N factor and VAS was treated as a T factor ("new categorization"). The clinical significance of the TNM grading system for colorectal cancer would be enhanced if we treat EX as a new categorization.