{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026147588611272515, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016269610691458453, 'mean_word_length': 4.917525773195877, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Development of a Control Strategy of Variable Speed Limits to Reduce Rear-End Collision Risks Near Freeway Recurrent Bottlenecks

The primary objective of this paper was to develop a control strategy of variable speed limits (VSLs) to reduce rear-end collision risks near freeway recurrent bottlenecks. The risks of rear-end collisions were estimated using a crash risk prediction model that is specifically developed for rear-end collisions in freeway bottleneck areas. The effects of the VSL control strategy were evaluated using a cell transmission model. Several control factors were tested, including the start-up threshold of the collision likelihood, the target speed limit, the speed change rate, and the speed difference between adjacent links. A genetic algorithm was used to optimize critical control factors. For the high demand scenario, the proposed control strategy used 25% of the maximum collision likelihood for the start-up threshold, 35 mi/h for the target speed limit, 10 mi/h per 30 s for the speed change rate, and 10 mi/h for the speed difference between different links. For the moderate demand scenario, the strategy used 20% of the maximum collision likelihood for the start-up threshold, 40 mi/h for the target speed limit, 15 mi/h per 30 s for the speed change rate, and 10 mi/h for the speed difference between different links. The results of comparative analyses suggested that the proposed control strategy outperformed other strategies in reducing the rear-end collision risks near freeway recurrent bottlenecks. With the proposed control strategy, the VSL control reduced the rear-end crash potential by 69.84% for the high demand scenario and by 81.81% for the moderate demand scenario.