{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023310023310023312, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.417910447761194, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluation of Paradigms Enabling Flexibility - BPMSs Comparative Study

In this paper, we make a comparative study between several paradigms that provide flexibility: constraint based, rule based, case handling and adaptive process support paradigms. We evaluate existing Business Process Management Systems (BPMSs) using the taxonomy of Regev et al. in order to assign a flexibility score to each of the corresponding paradigms.