{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02389705882352941, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014705882352941176, 'mean_word_length': 5.89873417721519, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Nuclear Boundaries: Material and Discursive Containment at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation

In his poststructuralist cultural history of the atomic age in America, Alan Nadel (1995) grounds his analysis in the metaphor of ‘containment culture’. According to Nadel, the American experience of the nuclear age is characterized by two inextricable narratives of containment: the foreign policy narrative of containing communism as epitomized by the rhetoric of George Kennan (1947), and a domestic narrative of discursive and cultural containment: