{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02067539627842867, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0013783597518952446, 'mean_word_length': 5.205128205128205, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of the Curative Antimalarial Activities and Toxicities of Primaquine and Its d and l Isomers

This investigation was undertaken to determine whether either d-primaquine or l-primaquine has sufficient advantage over primaquine to warrant evaluation for curative activity in human volunteers infected with Plasmodium vivax. It was found: (i) that the capacities of the isomers and the racemate to cure infections with Plasmodium cynomolgi in rhesus monkeys were essentially identical; (ii) that the subacute toxicities of the isomers and racemate for this monkey were qualitatively the same, but that l-primaquine was three to five times as toxic as d-primaquine and at least twice as toxic as primaquine; and (iii) that the acute single-dose. toxicities of the isomers for mice were not only qualitatively different, but that the d isomer was at least four times as toxic as 1-primaquine. Since previous appraisals of curative activity and tolerability of 8- aminoquinolines in rhesus monkeys have correlated well with appraisals in human volunteers, attention was focused on results acquired with these test subjects. The relevant evaluations showed that d-primaquine had a therapeutic index at least twice that of primaquine. If this advantage carries over to man, problems that now complicate routine use of primaquine might be obviated. Therefore, a critical comparison of d-primaquine and primaquine in human volunteers seems indicated.