{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03584640898073734, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020580856401751925, 'mean_word_length': 5.129267657023717, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 1, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
First Case of Staphylococci Carrying Linezolid Resistance Genes from Laryngological Infections in Poland

Linezolid is currently used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci. Both linezolid-resistant S. aureus (LRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) strains have been collected worldwide. Two isolates carrying linezolid resistance genes were recovered from laryngological patients and characterized by determining their antimicrobial resistance patterns and using molecular methods such as spa typing, MLST, SCCmec typing, detection of virulence genes and ica operon expression, and analysis of antimicrobial resistance determinants. Both isolates were multidrug resistant, including resistance to methicillin. The S. aureus strain was identified as ST-398/t4474/SCCmec IVe, harboring adhesin, hemolysin genes, and the ica operon. The S. haemolyticus strain was identified as ST-42/mecA-positive and harbored hemolysin genes. Linezolid resistance in S. aureus strain was associated with the mutations in the ribosomal proteins L3 and L4, and in S. haemolyticus, resistance was associated with the presence of cfr gene. Moreover, S. aureus strain harbored optrA and poxtA genes. We identified the first case of staphylococci carrying linezolid resistance genes from patients with chronic sinusitis in Poland. Since both S. aureus and CoNS are the most common etiological factors in laryngological infections, monitoring of such infections combined with surveillance and infection prevention programs is important to decrease the number of linezolid-resistant staphylococcal strains.


Introduction
Linezolid, the first oxazolidinone antimicrobial approved in clinical practice, is currently used to treat infections caused by Gram-positive cocci, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci [1]. The first linezolidresistant S. aureus (LRSA) strain was detected in 2001 [2]. Since then, linezolid-resistant S. aureus strains have been collected worldwide, but most of them are related to (i) severe diseases such as cystic fibrosis [3,4], (ii) ICU patients [5,6] or (iii) chronic infections with long-term linezolid treatments [7]. Not only have S. aureus linezolid-resistant strains been reported, but increasing linezolid resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) strains has also been observed. The first linezolid-resistant S. haemolyticus (LRSH) strain was reported by Rodríguez-Aranda et al. in 2009 [8]. Since then, a few strains (namely, 11) have been reported worldwide [9,10], but most of them were reported from China [11,12] and from India [13][14][15], with the last one in 2019 [16].
Linezolid reversibly binds and blocks the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center (PTC) and by this mechanism exerts bacteriostatic activity [17]. In staphylococcal clinical isolates, the mutation of the V domain of the 23S rRNA, namely, G2576U, is the most common modification of the ribosome at the PTC [2,9], but other mutations have also been identified [18]. Linezolid resistance has also been associated with mutations in the L3, L4, and L22 ribosomal proteins [18][19][20]. Moreover, the linezolid resistance, a transferable one, may be related to the cfr gene known since year 2000, and in staphylococci, firstly discovered in a bovine Staphylococcus sciuri strain and later reported also in other staphylococcal species [21]. The cfr gene is not only responsible for resistance to oxazolidinones but also mediates cross-resistance to other antibiotics, such as phenicols, lincosamides, pleuromutilins, and streptogramin A [22]. Recently, the linezolid resistance was also associated with the novel transferable oxazolidinone resistance gene, namely optrA. First, it was identified, mainly in enterococci from humans and animals [23,24] but recently, the optrA gene was detected also in a single porcine S. sciuri strain [25,26] and later confirmed in a few other S. sciuri strains [27]. In contrast to cfr gene, optrA confers cross-resistance only to oxazolidinones, including tedizolid and phenicols. In 2018, Antonelli et al. described the novel gene, named poxtA, responsible also for transferable linezolid resistance in MRSA strains. The poxtA gene encodes a protein of the ARE ABC-F family (lineage F of the ABC superfamily proteins associated with antibiotic resistance), one of the ribosomal protection proteins [28]. The poxtA gene is distantly related to optrA and able to cross-mediate susceptibility to phenicols, oxazolidinones, and tetracyclines. Moreover, it was also observed that poxtA gene could act synergistically with other oxazolidinone resistance mechanisms to further increase the level of resistance to this group of antibiotics [28].
Linezolid resistance has also emerged in patients without linezolid exposure, which is probably due to cross-transmission between patients, horizontal transfer of linezolid resistance mediated by transferable genes among different CoNS species or co-selection by treatment with other antibiotics [15,22]. Moreover, linezolid-resistant strains are also resistant to other groups of antibiotics, especially linezolid resistant strains are often simultaneously resistant to β lactams, so a proper characterization of broad resistance mechanisms is required [29].
In Poland, the only study related to linezolid resistant Staphylococcus strains recovered from ICU patients was published by our group in 2020 [6]. To date, there are no published reports related to linezolid-resistant strains detected in laryngological infections. Therefore, the study presented is the first in that field. Considering that staphylococci, including both S. aureus and CoNS, are the most frequent etiological factors in laryngological infections [30], their genetic and antimicrobial resistance profiles need to be further evaluated.
In the present study, two Staphylococcus isolates from laryngological infections were evaluated for their mechanisms of linezolid resistance and genetic profiles, and linked to patient characteristics.

Patient Characteristics
Two patients hospitalized in the MML Center were evaluated. The first patient, a male of age 37, was diagnosed with chronic sinusitis. In 2013, the patient underwent nasal septum correction, correction of lower nasal turbinates by the Celon method, functional endoscopic surgery of the paranasal sinuses, removal of a foreign body from the left maxillary sinus, and correction of the soft palate by the Celon method. Then, in 2016, the patient was admitted to a clinic with purulent runny nose after dental treatment and diagnosed with chronic maxillary sinusitis. The patient was referred for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The S. haemolyticus (WAW954 isolate) was cultured from the right sinus.
The second patient, a male aged 57, was admitted to the MML Center in the middle of 2016, diagnosed with chronic sinusitis, and qualified for surgery. The S. aureus (WAW1257 isolate) was cultured from right and left maxillary sinuses. During laryngological procedures, none of the patients were treated with linezolid. However, the first patient was treated with amoxycillin, clavic acid, and co-trimoxazole and the second patient with rifampicin and fusidic acid.

Characteristics of Isolates and Identification at the Species Level
A set of two isolates WAW1257 and WAW954 from the maxillary sinus collected from patients treated in the MML Medical Center were investigated. The preliminary identification with the Vitek ® 2 system identified the WAW1257 isolate as S. aureus and WAW954 as S. haemolyticus. Species identification was confirmed by four Sanger sequencing methods, namely, 16S rRNA, sodA, tuf, and rpoB genes.

Genetic Profiling and Clonality Analysis
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis revealed that S. aureus WAW1257 was ST398 and S. haemolyticus WAW954 was ST42. The S. aureus strain was assigned as spa type t4474. The SCCmec typing methods allowed for the identification of the SCCmec type IV subtype E for the WAW1257 strain and the presence of only the mecA gene in WAW954. The arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) typing showed that WAW1257 contained ACME type II (arc+, opp3−) and WAW954 ACME type III (arc−, opp3+) ( Table 1).

Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Resistance Determinants
Based on the European Committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST) breakpoints tables, the S. haemolyticus isolate was susceptible to only four antibiotics, tested in this study. Both isolates exhibited susceptibility to daptomycin and amikacin. Moreover, the S. aureus isolate was susceptible to fosfomycin, tigecycline, gentamicin, and S. haemolyticus to vancomycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole ( Table 2). The linezolid resistance was tested with the E-test method and resulted in MIC = 3 µg/mL for S. aureus and MIC = 6 µg/mL for S. haemolyticus (Table 2). Therefore, S. aureus was assigned as linezolid susceptible and S. haemolyticus as resistant.   Table 2). The S. haemolyticus isolate was also resistant to chloramphenicol and clindamycin, consistent with the presence of the cfr and fexA genes. The occurrence of cfr gene mediates in rendering the so-called PhLOPSA phenotype. S. haemolyticus was resistant to gentamicin, as confirmed by the presence of the aac(6 )-Ieaph(2") gene. The S. aureus strain was resistant to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, and had the norA gene (Table 2). Additionally, the S. aureus strain demonstrated T314C and G362A changes in their deduced amino acid sequences of the L3 protein and C575T changes in their deduced amino acid sequences of the L4 protein. For S. aureus and S. haemolyticus strains, no changes occurred in the analyzed part of the 23S rRNA genes or in the L22 protein genes. For the S. haemolyticus strain, no changes occurred in the L3 or L4 protein genes. Moreover, the S. aureus strain harbored the optrA and poxtA genes (Table 2). Altogether, the strains were resistant to six various classes of antimicrobials, i.e., they were multidrug resistant.

Discussion
In the era of multidrug-resistant strains, linezolid is still an effective treatment agent for Gram-positive coccus infections [31]. Nevertheless, the increase in linezolid-resistant S. aureus, S. haemolyticus, and other CoNS is worrisome. Mostly, the number of linezolidresistant strains occurs after increased administration of an antibiotic but not always [3,4,29].
What is important, the linezolid resistance can emerge in CoNS after only a few days of treatment and in S. aureus strains, it usually occurs after a long time after the treatment [18].
In our study, to our knowledge, the patients were not exposed to linezolid prior to the isolation of the resistant strains. This acquisition of linezolid resistance may relate to the highly plastic nature of the CoNS genome, which is driven largely by insertion sequences and other mobile genetic elements [32]. Patients may have acquired the strains carrying the linezolid resistance genes from their environment, during their other hospital stay or could have also undergone the linezolid treatment due to infections other than sinusitis. Here, we describe the first cases of S. aureus and S. haemolyticus strains carrying linezolid resistance genes collected from patients with chronic sinusitis. In recent years, sinus infections have developed into chronic maxillary sinusitis over time in approximately 15% of patients [33]. The occurrence of multidrug-resistant strains in such patients is a next step in spreading antibiotic resistance, including the one for so-called last chance antibiotics such as vancomycin. In case of our strains, the divergent results of vancomycin resistance testing were most probably due to hetero-resistance [34]. Based on previous research, the precise cut-off values for both VISA and VISS phenotypes change with time and are different depending on the country [35]. Due to KORDL recommendations [36], we believe that our MIC values, which are slightly over breakpoint, can be considered as vancomycin-intermediate.
Unlike prior studies, where ST5 and ST188 were predominant among linezolidresistant strains (data for S. aureus) [3,37], in our study, the S. aureus strain belonged to ST398, one of the most frequent lineages of LA-MRSA in Europe [38,39]. It was observed that the occurrence of LA-MRSA in human is strongly associated with the increased contact with livestock [40]. Furthermore, it is known that ST398 often shows extensive resistance, which is selected by the widespread use of antibiotics in livestock farming [41,42]. In the present case, the patient affirmed that he was engaged in animal breeding activities (cattle and poultry) and lived in proximity to dogs and cats.
As reported previously, ST398 can be combined with SCCmec type IV [43,44], and such a situation also occurred in our study. Due to previous studies, it was reported that the SCCmec IV has smaller components and due to its increased mobility was found in different genetic backgrounds [45]. Moreover, SCCmec IV is mostly related to community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) strains and is rarely found in health-care-associated MRSA strains (HA-MRSA) [46]. In recent years, it was also observed that SCCmec IV is present in several HA-MRSA clones, especially in Europe [47,48] but also worldwide [49,50]. Recent studies have reported that CA-MRSA strains are spreading in hospital settings and are replacing traditional HA-MRSA strains, especially in the United States of America [51,52].
To date, only a few reports on t4474 have been published. Data from one S. aureus strain belonging to t4474 isolated in Switzerland were submitted to a Ridom Spa Server database. Ho et al. published a study concerning MRSA from slaughtered pigs sampled from local markets in Hong Kong in 2012 [53], and Rodríguez-López et al. characterized MRSA from the Italian heavy swine production chain in 2020 [54]. Therefore, the worldwide distribution of this particular spa type is not exactly known. In our study, the S. aureus strain belonged to t4474, which is also consistent with the fact that the patient had contact with animals.
The arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) was first described in methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus and is considered to enhance transmission, persistence, and survival. It was shown that ACME elements are especially prevalent in CoNS species [55]. Considering that not only the ACME is associated with the widespread S. aureus clones but also its high prevalence in S. epidermidis strains was noted [56], we believe that the detection of this element in S. aureus and CoNS strains from laryngological infections, where the strains must survive sometimes for a long time, is crucial for monitoring the transmission and better understanding such strains. ACME is integrated downstream of the SCCmec cassette and is flanked by repeat sequences, together with cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) genes. It was proven, that ccr genes catalyze the integration and excision of ACME from the staphylococcal chromosome [56], which is consistent with our study, that the ACME element coexists with SCCmec type IV [57][58][59]. In contrast to studies performed on S. aureus, the ACME in CoNS has not yet been thoroughly clarified [60]. Previously, ACME types were distinguished by characteristic presence profiles of the arc and opp3 operons but recently, two novel ACME types harboring the potassium transporter-encoding operon kdp were described. In our study, the S. aureus strain possessed ACME type II, and the S. haemolyticus strain had ACME type III.
In our study, all the strains harbored virulence factors related to adhesion and hemolysis processes. In laryngological infections, not only are the adhesion-related factors important but also enzymes such as hemolysins can play a role in some of the effects of staphylococci on host organisms, with both involved in tissue destruction and as spreading factors facilitating invasion into nearby tissues [30]. Moreover, these factors may also be related to strains persistence in a host. In our study, the S. aureus strain also carried the icaADBC locus, which is responsible for the production of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), playing an important role in biofilm formation by bacteria [61]. In ICU patients with MRSA respiratory infection intubated for long periods, the systemic treatment with linezolid has a beneficial effect in limiting the MRSA burden [62,63]. Independent of that phenomenon, generally, the circulation of linezolid-resistant strains within a biofilm-associated operon generates a great risk for patients.
Although cfr-positive MRSA strains have occurred in many S. aureus lineages, in our study, the MRSA strain was cfr-negative and did not harbor mutations in the V region of 23S rRNA. In our study, the S. aureus strain had two mutations in the L3 protein (T314C; G362A) and one in the L4 protein (C575T). The amino acid substitutions were detected based on a comparison with reference genomes of linezolid-sensitive S. aureus strains. The obtained sequences were compared to the reference rplC and rplD gene sequences of S. aureus NCTC8325, N315, and MW2. We believe that the unambiguous confirmation of these mutations should be determined by whole genome sequencing, which can be performed in the future. Moreover, the S. aureus strain harbored both optrA and poxtA genes, responsible for transferable linezolid resistance. To our knowledge, this is the first detection of both optrA and poxtA genes and L3/L4 mutations in a single strain.
S. haemolyticus is a part of natural human skin microbiota and is, after S. epidermidis, the second most frequent species among clinical isolates of CoNS [64]. Nowadays, this species is recognized as an important nosocomial pathogen with a drift to develop multiple drug resistance, probably due to insertion sequences in its chromosome resulting in genomic rearrangements [65]. Indeed, S. haemolyticus was the first one among Gram-positive pathogens which acquired glycopeptide resistance and seems to show increased teicoplanin resistance in comparison to other CoNS [66]. In our study, the S. haemolyticus strain had only the mecA gene. Although, such structure of the SCCmec cassette was confirmed by two independent SCCmec typing methods, this is either a situation that the corresponding SCCmec element was non-typeable due to the alternative structure or modified primer binding sites or only the mecA gene is present. However, Miragaia et al. 2018 described that the CoNS species, including S. haemolyticus were characterized by high genetic diversity and recombination rate. Moreover, the ability to acquire and maintain exogenous genetic material or genetic mobile elements have been acquired earlier by these species than by S. aureus strains [67]. What is worrisome, the infection prevention controls, which are administered for MRSA are not used for CoNS and as a result, many multidrug resistant isolates, even those resistant to linezolid, stay undetected in health care settings. The detection of linezolid resistance in S. haemolyticus strains seems to be an emerging issue and requires stricter control to preserve linezolid for its clinical utility.
In our study, S. haemolyticus was PCR-positive for the cfr and fexA genes. The fexA gene presence was consistent with chloramphenicol resistance and the cfr gene detection conferred the S. haemolyticus PhLOPS a phenotype [22]. The cfr gene is located either in the chromosome or in plasmids or transposons which indicates a higher ability to transfer between strains [68,69]. The spread to susceptible populations or other pathogenic bacteria is facilitated. Moreover, the cfr-mediated resistance is related to an array of other antibiotics which limits therapeutic options. In Staphylococcus, the fexA gene is located in a small transposon Tn558 or in combination with the cfr gene in transposition-deficient Tn558 variants [70]. Here, we link the S. haemolyticus resistance with the presence of cfr gene, as no mutation in 23S rRNA nor L3/L4/L22 proteins was found. Such situation was observed for other linezolid resistant CoNS species [4,15,22].
To conclude, we identified the first cases of multidrug resistant S. aureus strain carrying linezolid resistance genes and linezolid-resistant S. haemolyticus strain from patients with chronic sinusitis in Poland. Since S. aureus and CoNS are the most common etiological factors of laryngological infections, monitoring linezolid resistance, together with the genetic characterization of such strains, is an emerging issue.

Strain Collection
The set of bacterial isolates used in this study included S. aureus (WAW1257) and S. haemolyticus (WAW954) clinical isolates carrying linezolid resistance genes recovered in 2016 from laryngological patients treated in MML Medical Center, Warsaw. Both isolates were recovered from maxillary sinuses. The preliminary identification of isolates was performed with a Vitek ® 2 Compact instrument (bioMérieux, La Balme Les Grottes, France).

Total DNA Extraction
For genomic DNA extraction, isolates were grown for 20 h at 37 • C on blood agar plates. A full inoculation loop of 10 µL of bacterial colonies was homogenized with a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) was used for genomic DNA extraction. The subsequent steps were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Purified DNA was stored at −20 • C.

Species Identification
Both isolates were identified at the species level by sequencing the 16S rRNA, sodA, tuf, and rpoB genes, as previously described [71][72][73][74]. The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis and purified using the Clean-Up Concentrator purification kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland). The concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000. The PCR products were sequenced with the Sanger method at Genomed S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) with the same primers as those used for PCR.

Spa Typing
Spa typing, based on the amplification of the variable X region of the protein A gene, was performed as described previously [75]. After sequencing, the spa type was assigned using the Ridom StaphType software version 2. 2. 1 (Ridom GmbH, Würzburg, Germany) and the Ridom SpaServer (https://spaserver.ridom.de/; accessed on 25 May 2020).

SCCmec Cassette Typing
The SCCmec cassettes were typed with two independent methods, as described previously by Milheirico et al. [79] and Kondo et al. [80], with the USA300 strain as a positive control for the IV SCCmec cassette. The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis, and the band patterns were analyzed.

Detection of Virulence and ica Operon Genes
The PCRs for the detection of virulence determinants such as adhesins, hemolysins, and biofilm formation genes were performed as described in Table 3. The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis, and the band patterns were analyzed.

Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers
The eight sequences for one Staphylococcus haemolyticus and one Staphylococcus aureus were annotated using the NCBI BankIt tool and deposited in the GenBank database (https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) under the following accession numbers: For the 16S rRNA gene, MW267294 and MW267295; for the sodA gene, MW272559 and MW272560; for the tuf gene, MW272562 and MW272563; and for the rpoB gene, MW272556 and MW272557.