{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009490940465918895, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.863905325443787, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Political Implications of Using New Technologies in Peace Operations

This article considers the political implications of using new technologies in peace operations. Technology has the potential to lower the human costs associated with peace operations by either replacing vulnerable personnel or making the environment for those personnel safer. Furthermore, technology can enhance the neutrality of a peace operations force and lessen the sovereignty problems that accompany most peace operations. If technology substitutes for soldiers, then the financial costs for operations could decline over time and political support could commensurably increase. Yet it may instead be the case that technology would only complement existing manpower and then additional costs might be expected. Technological applications in peace operations are insufficient to substitute for soldiers in conducting the interposition function that is the centrepiece of many peace operations. Furthermore, extensive technological applications in peace operations could remove some of the impetus for conflict resolution efforts that would promote peace and long-term stability.