{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025800711743772242, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012455516014234875, 'mean_word_length': 5.859756097560975, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
P17.05: Relationship between uterine artery Doppler and the risk of stillbirth in our population

Results: The US signs of critical congenital structural anomalies, associated with a risk of perinatal losses and serious neonatal complications were collected. US and Doppler prenatal predictors and their combinations that had the strongest significant correlations with adverse perinatal and postnatal outcomes (p<0,001 and p<0.05) were identified. When oligohydramnios or /and maternal arterial hypertension were associated with the abnormalities of US monitoring adverse postnatal outcomes prevailed (p<0.05). Conclusions: The perinatal risk scale according to the results of antenatal US monitoring was provided. There were proposed the US gradations of an extremely high, high or uncertain perinatal risk. The scale can be used for prenatal counselling, patients contingent selection for referral to perinatal centres, and for postnatal prospective follow-up. This scale can improve the understanding between different professionals working in the general perinatal space: obstetricians, radiologists and neonatologists.