{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023629489603024575, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.7025316455696204, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Designing Negotiations Toward a New Regime: The Case of Global Warming

I Popular and scientific concern has been rising about the possibility that human activities will result in damaging global climate change.’ Along with recent weather extremes, a number of computer models suggest that a warming is in prospect that could change weather and crop patterns, cause sea-level rises that would inundate low-lying areas, and result in other unprecedented and adverse consequences. Its apparent causes are embedded in the very fabric of industrial and agricultural practice; greenhouse gasemarbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), methane, and nitrous oxides-are emitted as a result of worldwide modes of energy use, transportation, industry, farming, and forestry. Since the atmosphere is a true commons in which greenhouse gases fully diffuse, complete global interdependence exists with respect to both emissions and control measures. Further, while carbon-emitting activities in developed countries since the Industrial Revolution are largely responsible