{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02922077922077922, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.876190476190477, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Yet Another Last Word on Molière's Raisonneur

To review in detail the history of scholarship on the raisonneur in Molière would be to incur the charge of tedium often levelled against the character. In general, criticism in the last thirty years has steered a middle course between Michaut and Bray, between a well-filled gallery of spokesmen and a categorical: “il n'y a pas de raisonneurs dans le Théâtre de Molière” (“there are no raisonneurs in Molière's theatre”). Most of Michaut's raisonneurs have gone the way of Saint Christopher, and few commentators still heed the authorial voice Michaut so often heard.