{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013043478260869565, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013043478260869565, 'mean_word_length': 5.315068493150685, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Williams syndrome: objective definition and diagnosis

Fifty‐two patients referred for suspicion of the Williams syndrome have been evaluated and divided into those with and without the syndrome by numerical analysis. A diagnostic index using 50 characters separates patients into two groups with an expected accuracy of 99%. An index using 40 of the characteristics is expected to be applicable to young infants without a substantial decrease in accuracy.