{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024, 'mean_word_length': 5.036144578313253, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Causation in Criminal Law: A New Look at Jordan, Smith, Blaue and Cheshire

This article re-evaluates cases decided on legal causation in criminal law since Holland (1841) taking cognisance of advances in medical science, good medical practice and judicial attitudes. It is argued that Re T (1992) and Bland (1993) and cases sequel to them cast serious doubts on (and indeed compel a restatement of) the principles of legal attribution relating to intervening events and refusal of medical treatment.