{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012138188608776844, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007469654528478058, 'mean_word_length': 5.196531791907514, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Review Of Distraction Arthroplasty Vs Ankle Arthrodesis Vs Ankle Replacement

Recent developments in surgical techniques have led to new methods to treat ankle arthritis and perhaps produce a better effect on joint function and gait improvement. The indications for total ankle replacement, ankle fusion, or distraction arthroplasty in the management of ankle arthritis are controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate different approaches with an overview of the literature. 

Core tip: Ankle arthritis is a common debilitating chronic disease that is not only present in the geriatric population, but also younger populations. The main method to treat end stage arthritis is ankle fusion. Ankle replacement is currently improving in popularity. Both treatment options manage end stage arthritis. It is important to consider the role of distraction arthroplasty in the context of these two other well accepted treatments. Here we examine the literature from 1941 to 2020 considering our own experience and the growing role regenerative techniques and biologics.