{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020265003897116135, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001558846453624318, 'mean_word_length': 5.722513089005235, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Review of the anticaries effectiveness of professionally applied and self-applied topical fluoride gels.

Of the five types of topical fluoride gel products available in the United States, two have not been clinically tested in randomized double blind clinical trials. For those tested, the averaged results of clinical trials involving schoolchildren in fluoride-deficient communities indicate a caries reduction of approximately 26 percent from either a professional or self-administered program. A similar relative reduction can be expected from programs conducted in fluoridated communities, but the absolute caries inhibition is less. Twice-a-year professional applications are more effective than once-a-year applications, and self-applications using trays are more effective than applying the gel on a toothbrush. For subjects beyond school age, there are few clinical studies of either self-applied or professionally applied gels; however, current epidemiological evidence does not indicate a need for public health caries preventive programs for healthy employed adults. For medically compromised patients, especially those exhibiting rampant caries associated with radiation-induced xerostomia, a variety of topical gel procedures appear to be effective in limiting caries.