{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014584891548242334, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0029917726252804786, 'mean_word_length': 5.621287128712871, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Development of an Academic Emotion Regulation Intervention Model for Academic Probation Students

Objectives The purpose of this study is to develop an academic emotion regulation intervention model for academic probation students. 
Methods The study was conducted according to the ADDIE model. First, in the draft model development stage, the process, details, and approach of academic emotion regulation intervention for academic probation students were derived through literature analysis, and each key element of the model was designed so that it could be systematically sequenced to develop a draft model. Second, in the implementation process, the developed preliminary model was applied to academic probation students of actual university sites to confirm the effectiveness of the model. The results of ANCOVA of 22 academic probation students(11 experiments, 11 controls) showed a significant effect on improving academic emotion regulation. In order to analyze the effect, participants' evaluations were analyzed and reflected in the intervention. Third, the evaluation process verified the usefulness and value of the preliminary model. An expert formation evaluation was conducted in a focus group interview composed of nine learning experts. The output from the implementation was reviewed and the value of the developed model was evaluated. Finally, the final model was developed by modifying and supplementing the model. 
Results The research results of this study are as follows. First, first, this model organically linked the academic warning overcoming process, academic emotion, and academic emotion regulation process. Second, this model suggests a systematic procedure for learning experts to effectively solve the academic emotional regulation problem of academic warnings. Third, this model presented a 4x3 matrix type of intervention method according to the approach for academic emotion regulation intervention. Fourth, in this model, the academic emotion regulation was cyclically performed in consideration of the academic emotions of the academic warning. Conclusion This study is meaningful in developing a model that can be used by actual learning experts to intervene in academic emotional regulation for academic warnings by fully reflecting the emotional characteristics of academic warnings and the experiences and needs of learning experts. 
Conclusions This study is significant in developing a model that can be used by actual learning experts to intervene in academic emotional regulation for academic probations by fully reflecting the emotional characteristics of academic probations and the experiences and needs of learning experts.