{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02959830866807611, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.405405405405405, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bulge-activation hypothesis: is it valid?

This essay is a critique of a revolutionary hypothesis, and of the language used to frame it, that offers a novel interpretation for the dynamics of the follicular cycle by distinguishing, distinctly, germinative cells in the bulge from matrical cells in the bulb. Curiously, this intriguing "bulge-activation hypothesis" elicited practically no response in the scientific literature, and our critique is designed to rectify that.