{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017304189435336976, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.426900584795321, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Learning possibilistic graphical models from data

Graphical models - especially probabilistic networks like Bayes networks and Markov networks - are very popular to make reasoning in high-dimensional domains feasible. Since constructing them manually can be tedious and time consuming, a large part of recent research has been devoted to learning them from data. However, if the dataset to learn from contains imprecise information in the form of sets of alternatives instead of precise values, this learning task can pose unpleasant problems. In this paper, we survey an approach to cope with these problems, which is not based on probability theory as the more common approaches like, e.g., expectation maximization, but uses the possibility theory as the underlying calculus of a graphical model. We provide semantic foundations of possibilistic graphical models, explain the rationale of possibilistic decomposition as well as the graphical representation of decompositions of possibility distributions and finally discuss the main approaches to learn possibilistic graphical models from data.