{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0167276529012023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.275409836065574, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
ROLE OF EGYPTIAN (HAMLETS) VILLAGES SUBSIDIARIES “EZAB,KOFOR,NOGOA” IN FORMULATION THE EGYPTIAN RURAL PHYSICAL PATTERN

The concept of the rural physical pattern is linked to a number of planning levels, starting from the national level to the local level. Despite the importance of each of the physical patterns (rural and urban), most of the research tended to focus on the urban pattern to focus on cities, their growth and the development of planning theories. The aspects of rural urbanization began to receive a great deal of attention, especially from the geographical point of view at the beginning of the twentieth century. The satellites of the Egyptian villages (ezab, kofor, and nogoa) are the basic nucleus of the Egyptian village and the origin of the formation of the Egyptian countryside. This research reviews a number of features of these satellites in terms of defining them, their beginnings, the reasons for their emergence, their historical development, the organizing framework for them, their legal status and some of their social and urban characteristics in order to know the size and extent of the impact of these satellites in forming the Egyptian rural population and the impact of their distribution on the physical pattern, especially with their large number and in The diversity of its forms and nature. The research concluded a number of results, the most important of which is the link between the subsidiaries of the villages and the agricultural land tenure systems and the presence of a strong reflection of the administrative and legislative systems on the size of the villages’ subsidiaries, and the importance of developing multiple alternatives for rural development with good urban management, especially with regard to controlling urban growth and coordination between the relevant authorities to ensure optimal exploitation for the efforts and integration between them.