{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018490754622688656, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.437299035369775, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The objective imputation and its necessary limit in the modern Criminal Law of Ukraine

In the article the notions the problems associated with the application of objective imputation. Objective imputation in the Criminal Code is not provided and is not perceived unambiguously in the criminal-law doctrine. At the same time, there are a number of exceptions in which objective imputation is applied and is expedient. The work proposes to legislatively regulate the boundaries of its application. Use and application objective imputation in practice does not always have negative phenomenon, but rather a valid, useful, appropriate, necessary and effective means of combating crime and an instrument to achieve the objectives of the Criminal Code, but only as an exception to the rule, within certain limits. To eliminate discrepancies in mean this phenomenon, it is necessary to: normative regulatory limits of acceptability objective imputation; normative fixing of criminalization principles; providing sufficient time to familiarize with the changes of the Criminal Code of Ukraine; compliance with codification rules and the like. Objective imputation is permissible in cases of: ignorance of the criminal law by the person who committed the crime; the person has committed a crime in intoxication of alcohol, drugs or other intoxicating substances; a socially dangerous act has caused grave consequences, provided that the person intentionally committed a socially dangerous act, but to the socially dangerous consequences that came carelessly, because it did not foresee their occurrence, but should have foreseen. Criminal law should be defined, clear and understandable not only by law enforcers, but also by subjects of criminal law relations. Of course, it is difficult to imagine absolutely defined criminal rules. At the same time, it is possible and necessary to minimize uncertainties, in particular large number of assessment concepts, blanket norms and collision in the Criminal Code.