{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02377075871051775, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0022793878215564964, 'mean_word_length': 5.751648351648352, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A new approach to the management of emerging diseases of aquatic animals.

Since 1970, aquaculture has grown at a rate of between 5% and 10% per annum. It has achieved this by expanding into new areas, farming new (often non-native) species and intensifying production. These features of aquaculture, combined with large-scale movements of animals, have driven disease emergence, with negative consequences for both production and biodiversity. Efforts to improve the management of emerging diseases of aquatic animals must include actions to reduce the rate of disease emergence, enhance disease detection and reporting, and improve responses to prevent disease spread. The rate of disease emergence can be reduced by understanding the underpinning mechanisms and developing measures to mitigate them. The three principal mechanisms of disease emergence, namely, host switching, decreased host immunocompetence and increased pathogen virulence, have many drivers. The most important of these drivers are those that expose susceptible hosts to novel pathogens (e.g. the introduction of non-native hosts, translocation of pathogens, and increased interaction between wild and farmed populations), followed by host switching. Exposure to wild populations can be reduced through infrastructure and management measures to reduce escapes or exclude wild animals (e.g. barrier nets, filtration and closed-confinement technology). A high standard of health management ensures immunocompetence and resistance to putative new pathogens and strains, and thus reduces the rate of emergence. Appropriate site selection and husbandry can reduce the likelihood of pathogens developing increased virulence by preventing their continuous cycling in geographically or temporally linked populations. The under-reporting of emerging aquatic animal diseases constrains appropriate investigation and timely response. At the producer level, employing information and communications technology (e.g. smartphone applications and Cloud computing) to collect and manage data, coupled with a farmer-centric approach to surveillance, could improve reporting. In addition, reporting behaviours must be understood and disincentives mitigated. At the international level, improving the reporting of emerging diseases to the World Organisation for Animal Health allows Member Countries to implement appropriate measures to reduce transboundary spread. Reporting would be incentivised if the global response included the provision of support to low-income countries to, in the short term, control a reported emerging disease, and, in the longer term, develop aquatic animal health services. Early detection and reporting of emerging diseases are only of benefit if Competent Authorities' responses prevent disease spread. Effective responses to emerging diseases are challenging because basic information and tools are often lacking. Consequently, responses are likely to be sub-optimal unless contingency plans have been developed and tested, and decision-making arrangements have been well established.