{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.038751345532831, 'fraction_numerical': 0.06458557588805167, 'mean_word_length': 5.36986301369863, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Developments in the statistical analysis of categorical data

During the past ten years the social sciences have benefited from a ’major advance in the analysis of categorical data, an area where statistical methodology had previously been weak’ (Coxon, 1977). In the late 1960s and early 1970s a series of influential papers and books on the analysis of categorical data was published (Cox, 1970; Goodman, 1970; 1972a; 1972b; Grizzle et al., 1969; Theil, 1969; 1970) which succeeded in reaching and influencing a wide audience in a range of disciplines including statistics, biometrics, medicine, econometrics, sociology and transportation science. At the same time, a number of doctoral dissertations or early research papers on the topic were completed by workers such as Fienberg (1968), Bishop (1967), McFadden (1968) and Haberman (1970) who were subsequently to produce equally influential books and papers in the mid 1970s