{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03359858532272325, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016799292661361626, 'mean_word_length': 4.98941798941799, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical Material Reviews: TITLE: Test of Adolescent Language-2 (TOAL-2) AUTHOR(s): Donald D. Hammill, Virginia L. Brown, Stephen C. Larsen, and J. Lee Wiederholt PUBLISHER: Pro-Ed 5341 Industrial Oaks Boulevard Austin, TX 78735 RETAIL COST: $82.00

While this rationale is understandable, it may not be the most appropriate for assessing phonological processes. Some processes, deletion of unstressed syllables, for example, could not be assessed with these stimuli. Further, it appears that little consideration was given to the number of opportunities for occurrence of each phonological process. There are ten instances when the test stimuli provide only one opportunity for the occurrence of a given phonological process. This would not seem to be a sufficient sampling to determine whether or not the process is used productively. Similarly, there does not appear to be any correlation between the frequency of occurrence data for each process and the number of times each process is tested (e.g., deaffrication is reported as having a 79 percent frequency of occurence among the 50 children with moderate to severe articula-