{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009643201542912247, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.92, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Electrical promontory stimulation in patients with intact cochlear nerve and anacusis following acoustic neuroma surgery

Anacusis following hearing preservation surgery for acoustic neuroma removal in which the cochlear nerve was preserved has been explained on the basis of neural or vascular compromise. In the absence of pathologic evidence for either theory, a physiologic model was chosen. Electrical promontory stimulation with monitoring of subjective and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses was undertaken. A positive response to stimulation suggests a vascular impairment of the cochlea sparing the cochlear nerve and spiral ganglion. The absence of response suggests loss of neural integrity at the level of the spiral ganglion or cochlear nerve. Six patients who suffered anacusis following hearing preservation surgery for acoustic neuroma were studied. Data regarding electrical promontory stimulation, auditory brainstem responses, and implications of the possible role of cochlear implantation are discussed.