{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011283497884344146, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04372355430183357, 'mean_word_length': 5.173913043478261, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Potential impacts of small dam removal on fish and mussel communities in North Carolina

i Acknowledgements ii Tables and Figures iv Introduction 1 Methods 5 Results 6 Impacts of Small Dams on Fish and Mussels 6 Effects on mussel habitat 6 Longitudinal changes in population structures 8 Host fish interactions 8 Sedimentation and contamination associated with dams 11 Lessons Learned in North Carolina 12 The Little River: Lowell Mill Dam 12 The Little River: Rain’s Mill Dam 17 The Deep River: Carbonton Dam 18 The Tuckasegee River: Dillsboro Dam 20 Hitchcock Creek: Steele’s Mill 22 The Neuse River: Quaker Neck Dam 24 Discussion 25 Conclusions and Recommendations for Managers 29 References 31 Appendix 38