{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01650943396226415, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0047169811320754715, 'mean_word_length': 5.383458646616542, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Severance Payments and Firm-Specific Human Capital

What effect does employment protection through severance payments have on the behaviour of employed workers? We analyse this issue within a stochastic two-period framework where workers decide on human capital investments and find two competing effects: severance payments imply higher job security that fosters human capital formation. At the same time, a lay-off is perceived by the workers to be a weaker penalty if severance payments are provided. This incentive lowers their optimal amount of firm-specific investments. Which effect prevails on balance depends on the distribution of investment returns among firm and workers. For strong positive reactions, employment protection is also in the interests of the firm. Copyright Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini and Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2003.