{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02127659574468085, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.252336448598131, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Towards a Periodic Table of conceptualization and formalization on State, Style, Structure, Pattern, Framework, Architecture, Service and so on

Conceptual identification and semantic formalization of concepts are necessary for sharing thought among individuals and accumulating cognition of concepts in discrete minds. The extent of how well concepts are conceptually identified, clarified and semantically formalized essentially determines in positive ratio to how well these concepts can function effectively, and perform efficiently. However, after a long struggle with various effort, we still are not fully satisfied with the conceptual revelation and semantic formalization of some fundamental concepts in natural language, e.g., software Style, Structure, Pattern, Framework, Architecture, Service, etc. Based on our proposed Existence Computation, which enables conceptual revelation and formalizing semantics of concepts from the extreme beginning of cognition on existence, and the ideology of Relationship Defined Everything of Semantic, which provides a global unification of constructive semantic expression, we proposed a Periodic Table like conceptualization and formalization mechanism of concepts, called Existence Periodic Table, based on a two level existence evaluation architecture: atomic existence level referring to independence semantic, and typed existence level bundled with semantic of completeness. We show the cases of utilization of our proposed Existence Periodic table in identification and formalization of concepts.