{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04512753433616743, 'fraction_numerical': 0.028122956180510136, 'mean_word_length': 5.169354838709677, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Early stress tests following an uncomplicated myocardial infarct: a comparison between symptom-limited and submaximal tests].

To compare the diagnostic and prognostic usefulness of symptom-limited versus load-limited submaximal stress testing, 76 patients, during the first week post acute non-complicated myocardial infarction, were submitted to a symptom-limited Naughton-modified protocol stress test. At 2 METs, 3 METs and maximal effort levels, the tests were classified as positive or negative following the currently used criteria. After a mean follow-up of 15 months, the symptom-limited protocol showed the best sensitivity (95%), specificity (78%), positive (64%) and negative (98%) predictive value, and also the highest risk ratio (27.4) for prediction of subsequent coronary events (2p less than 0.01 vs 2 METs, 3 METs and 2D-Echocardiogram results). Forward stepped multiple correlation analysis indicated independent prognostic value for the results of the symptom-limited stress test (R2: .52 p less than 0.01) and for the location of the myocardial infarction (R2: .05 p less than 0.05) only. In addition, the discriminant prognostic power of the symptom-limited protocol was significant after the fourth month of follow-up (2p less than 0.05 vs submaximal tests and 2D-Echo). Therefore, we recommend the performance of a symptom-limited stress test during the first week post acute non-complicated myocardial infarction, provided that all coronary active medication has been withheld 24 hours before the test.