{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.037108125399872044, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01983365323096609, 'mean_word_length': 5.109375, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of liposome-encapsulated acyclovir with acyclovir ointment: ocular pharmacokinetics in rabbits.

A positively charged liposomal formulation for topical administration of acyclovir (ACV) was investigated in comparison with a commercial ACV ointment, by determining the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug in the aqueous humor of rabbits after topical administration. The ointment was tested at two different strengths: undiluted (3.0%) and diluted to the same ACV concentration as the liposomal vehicle (0.12%). A liquid formulation containing ACV plus "empty" liposomes and an isotonic aqueous ACV solution were also tested. The applied ACV dose was 0.18 mg, except for the full-strength (3.0%) ointment, in which case it was 1.5 mg. The ACV liposomal dispersion (LIPO-ACV) produced a significantly higher drug concentration profile in the aqueous with respect the three reference formulations containing the same ACV concentration, and showed a 90-minute plateau. The aqueous humor ACV concentration maintained by LIPO-ACV during the plateau was in the upper range of the ID(50)s (0.01 to 0.7 microg/mL) reported for Herpes simplex type 1. In spite of the much higher dose (1.5 versus 0.18 mg), the area under curve (AUC) produced by the full-strength 3.0% ointment was only 1.6 times greater than that corresponding to the liposomal vehicle. In vitro release tests through a cellophane membrane substantiated the concept that positively charged liposomal formulations owe their efficacy to interactions with the positively charged corneal epithelium.