{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03583735354927636, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01722949689869056, 'mean_word_length': 5.3130434782608695, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cytoplasmatic and Nuclear YAP1 and pYAP1 Staining in Urothelial Bladder Cancer

Introduction: Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), the nuclear effector of the Hippo pathway, plays an important role in many tumor entities. We evaluated staining and clinical significance of YAP1 and phosphorylated YAP1 (pYAP1) in urothelial bladder cancer (BCA). Materials and Methods: We used a tissue micorarray with samples of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC, n = 192), non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC, n = 192) and normal urothelial bladder tissue (CTRL, n = 38) to determine the immunhistochemical staining of YAP1 and pYAP1. Cytoplasmatic and nuclear levels were evaluated. The t test was used for comparative analysis. Overall survival and progression-free survival were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: Nuclear YAP1 as well as cytoplasmatic pYAP1 levels were higher in CTRL than in BCA, whereby both - NMIBC and MIBC - had lower levels than CTRL. Among patients with MIBC, cytoplasmatic YAP1 and pYAP1 staining decreased with advanced stage. YAP1 and pYAP1 staining did not correlate with the recurrence rate, progression-free, cancer-specific or overall survival. Conclusions: Immunhistochemical staining and subcellular localization of YAP1 and pYAP1 are different for BCA, NMIBC, MIBC and CTRL, indicating that the Hippo pathway is involved in urothelial carcinogenesis.