{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.06100104275286757, 'fraction_numerical': 0.06256517205422316, 'mean_word_length': 4.1310160427807485, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Survey regarding the clinical practice of cardiac CT in Germany: indications, scanning technique and reporting.

PURPOSE
To obtain an overview of the current clinical practice of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in Germany.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
A 30-item questionnaire was mailed to 149 providers of cardiac CT in Germany. The items asked about indications, scanning technique and reporting, data storage, and cost of the examination.


RESULTS
Overall 45 questionnaires could be analyzed (30 %). The majority of centers (76 %, 34 of 45 centers) used CT scanners of the latest generation (at least 64 rows). The most common appropriate indications were exclusion of coronary artery disease (91 %, 41 / 45), coronary anomalies (80 %, 36 / 45), and follow-up after coronary artery bypass grafting (53 %, 24 / 45). Each center examined on average 243 +/- 310 patients in 2007 and the number of centers performing cardiac CT increased significantly in 2007 (p = 0.035) compared with the preceding year. Most used sublingual nitroglycerin (84 %, 38 / 45; median of 2 sprays = 0.8 mg) and/or a beta blocker (86 %, 39 / 44; median of 5 mg IV, median heart rate threshold: 70 beats/min). Many providers used ECG-triggered tube current modulation (65 %, 29 / 44) and/or adjusted the tube current to the body mass index or body weight (63 %, 28 / 44). A median slice thickness of 0.75 mm with a 0.5 mm increment and a 20 cm field-of-view was most commonly used. Source images in orthogonal planes (96 %, 43 / 45), curved MPRs (93 %, 42 / 45), and thin-slice MIPs (69 %, 31 / 45) were used most frequently for interpretation. Extracardiac structures were also evaluated by 84 % of the centers (38 / 45). The mean examination time was 16.2 min and reporting took an average of 28.8 min.


CONCLUSION
Cardiac CT has rapidly become an established procedure with standards regarding indications, scanning technique, and reporting.