{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016842105263157894, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.172077922077922, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A new version of duplex perception: evidence for phonetic and nonphonetic fusion.

In a series of experiments, a variant of duplex perception was investigated. In its original form, duplex perception is created by presenting an isolated transition to one ear and the remainder of the syllable, the standard base, to the other ear. Listeners hear a chirp at the ear receiving the isolated transition, and a full syllable at the ear receiving the base. The new version of duplex perception was created by presenting a third-formant transition in isolation to one ear and the same transition electronically mixed with the base to the other ear; the modified base now has all the information necessary for syllabic perception. With the new procedure, listeners reported hearing a chirp centered in the middle of their head and a syllable in the ear presented the modified base that was clearer than that produced by the isolated transition and standard base. They could also reliably choose the patterns that contained the additional transition in the base when attending to either the phonetic or nonphonetic sides of the duplex percept. In addition, when the fundamental frequency, onset time, and intensity of the isolated third-formant transition were varied relative to the base, the phonetic and nonphonetic (lateralization) percepts were differentially affected, although not always reliably. In general, nonphonetic fusion was more affected by large differences in these variables than was phonetic fusion. However, when two isolated third-formant transitions were presented dichotically, fusion and the resulting central location of the chirp failed markedly with relatively small differences in each variable. The results were discussed in terms of the role of fusion in the new version of duplex perception and the nature of the information that undergoes both phonetic and nonphonetic fusion.