{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019782393669634024, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01582591493570722, 'mean_word_length': 5.170731707317073, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison of purging and multiple rectal swabs in the detection of inapparent cholera infections.

The relative effectiveness of daily rectal-swab cultures and cultures of purged stools in detecting inapparent infections of Vibrio cholerae were compared in family contacts of cholera patients. In one study of 187 contacts, a combination of purging by various methods plus 5 daily swabs detected 50 infections. Only 27 (54%) were detected by the purge alone, while 47 (94%) were detected by 5 daily rectal-swab cultures. In a second study of two groups of family contacts, purging on the first day did not appear to influence significantly the number of positive rectal-swab cultures obtained during the 4 subsequent days. The relative inefficiency of purging in detecting the inapparent infections among cholera contacts, as compared with its reported efficacy in the chronic convalescent carrier, probably reflects a basic difference in the pathogenesis and site of infection in these different conditions.