{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04872932150563414, 'fraction_numerical': 0.033684967633660995, 'mean_word_length': 4.2867553865652726, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 10, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 26, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 3, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical efficacy and safety of different tacrolimus concentrations for the treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy

This retrospective study aimed to explore the relative efficacy and safety of different tacrolimus (TAC) concentrations in the treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). A total of 260 IMN patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) were recruited. Among these, 125 patients had TAC concentrations no greater than 5 ng/ml (CTAC ≤ 5 ng/ml), and 135 patients had TAC concentrations greater than 5 ng/ml (CTAC > 5 ng/ml). The primary outcomes included complete remission (CR) rates and overall (OR) response rates. The secondary outcomes included 24-h urinary protein (24-h UP), serum albumin and serum creatinine, and adverse events (AEs). During the 12-month follow-up, the overall response rates were significantly different between the CTAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group and the CTAC > 5 ng/ml group (P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the CR at 12 months between the two groups (chi-square, 62% vs 63%, P = 0.852). Compared with the CTAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group, the CTAC > 5 ng/ml group had improved levels of 24 h UP (P = 0.017) and serum albumin (P = 0.010). Moreover, the incidences of acute reversible nephrotoxicity (P < 0.001), hepatotoxicity (P = 0.036), new-onset diabetes mellitus (P = 0.036), and glucose intolerance (P = 0.005) were lower in the CTAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group than in the CTAC > 5 ng/ml group. The CTAC > 5 ng/ml group was improved relative to the CTAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group in terms of a PR and CR at 6 months, but there was no difference in the CR between the two groups at 12 months.

Treatment protocol. Among all collected NS patients, one cohort (n = 125) included standard-compliant patients whose blood concentrations of TAC were no greater than 5 ng/ml (C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml), and the second cohort (n = 135) included standard-compliant patients whose blood concentrations of TAC were greater than 5 ng/ml (C TAC > 5 ng/ml). Therapy with TAC was initiated at a dose of 0.05 ~ 0.075 mg/kg/d (0.5-1 mg capsules) in 2 divided doses before meals at 12 h intervals. The whole blood TAC level was regularly checked (every 1 week during the first 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks for 8 weeks and then monthly during the remaining 9 months) for all TAC users. The trough concentration of TAC in fasting whole blood was measured by a chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). The TAC concentration was determined after stabilization for at least 4 weeks. Six months later, the dosage of TAC was adjusted by the physician mainly based on the patients' manifestations. For patients who had achieved a complete remission (CR), the TAC was tapered and maintained at the minimum effective dose during the follow-up. For the patients who showed no response at all, TAC was discontinued after 6 months, and they were categorized as no remission (NR) at 12 months. For the rest of the patients, full-dose TAC was continued until a CR or PR was achieved. In addition, a daily dose of oral GC was initiated at 15-20 mg in parallel with tacrolimus every morning.
Follow-up and outcomes. Follow-up of the participants was scheduled at 6 and 12 months after the initiation of the immunosuppression described above. We predefined the potential baseline indexes, including sex, age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, TAC concentration, 24-h urinary protein (24-h UP) level, serum creatinine (Scr) level, serum albumin level, eGFR, total cholesterol level, triglyceride level, high-density lipoprotein level, low-density lipoprotein level, lipoprotein (mmol/L) level, UA level, fasting glucose level, HbA1c level, and anti-PLA2R. In addition, the use of GCs, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were observed in this patient population. Moreover, the use of cyclophosphamide therapies was not allowed.
The primary efficacy assessment was a CR, defined as a 24 h UP level < 0.3 g and the serum albumin had to be ≥ 30 g/l with stable renal function. We also evaluated the rates of an overall response [CR plus partial remission (PR)] at months 6 and 12, with PR defined as reduced no less than 50% of the baseline UP levels plus a final UP < 3.5 g/24 h but > 0.3 g/24 h with a normal or improved serum albumin peak and stable Scr.
The secondary efficacy assessments included 24 h UP, serum albumin, Scr and the incidence of any adverse events (AEs). No remission (NR) was defined as patients who did not achieve the CR or PR criteria after 6 months of TAC. Renal relapse (RR) was defined as an increase in urinary protein excretion > 3.5 g/d in consecutive analyses in patients with CR or PR. Acute reversible nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in the serum creatinine level greater than 25% compared with baseline, which improved after a 50% reduction in TAC daily dosage for 15 days. Persistent nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level greater than 50% compared with baseline, which persisted despite a 50% reduction in the TAC dose after 15 days 10 .
Statistical analysis. Normally distributed variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and an independent or paired t-test was used for comparison when appropriate. Nonparametric continuous variables were represented by the median of the quartile interval [(IQR) 25th and 75th percentile] and were compared as appropriate using nonparametric tests. Categorical variables were summarized as proportions and Pearson's chi-square test was used for comparisons. The time-event data were described by Kaplan-Meier curves, and the differences between the groups were compared by log-rank tests. The longitudinal data analysis method was used to analyse the repeated measures data. GraphPad Prism (Version 7.0, San Diego, USA) and SPSS (Version 23.0, Chicago, USA) were used for statistical analysis. Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was used www.nature.com/scientificreports/ to obtain a representative cut-off value for TAC levels between responders versus non-responders. To obtain this distinct value, a trade-off was made between sensitivity and specificity. Patients were divided into a group of non-responders and a group of responders according to an overall response criterion at months 12. And the differences in the area under the curve (AUC) were analyzed using MedCalc version 15.0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium). When the bilateral P value < 0.05, the differences were considered to be statistically significant. Fig. 1. Preliminary screening identified 805 patients, and 260 subjects were finally included in this study. A total of 125 patients received TAC at serum concentrations of no more than 5 ng/ml, and 135 patients with a similar risk profile with regard to progression received TAC at serum concentrations greater than 5 ng/ml. There were seven censored patients among the standard-compliant patients whose serum TAC concentrations were no more than 5 ng/ml who were missing important data (24 h UP) during follow-up. Among the standard-compliant patients whose concentrations were greater than 5 ng/ml, four lacked important data (24 h UP level and medication administration record) during follow-up. These patients were excluded from the study. At baseline, the patient characteristics were similar between the two cohorts (Table 1).

Patients and baseline characteristics. A flowchart for selecting patients is shown in
Effectiveness. Figure 2 shows an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.859 (95%CI 0.810 to 0.898, P < 0.0001).
At 5 ng/mL, a sensitivity of 80.18% and a specificity of 0% were found. The AUC in the ROC curve is significantly different from 0.5, concluding that TAC concentration has the ability to distinguish between the group of responders and the group of non-responders. As shown in Table 2, the rates of CR were higher in the C TAC > 5 ng/ ml group than in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group (chi-square, 38% vs 26%, P < 0.001) at 6 months. However, there was no significant difference in the CR at 12 months between the two groups (chi-square, 62% vs 63%, P = 0.852). The Kaplan-Meier analysis for the probability of a CR was not significantly different between the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ www.nature.com/scientificreports/ ml group and the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group (P = 0.091, Fig. 3A). Figure 3B shows the Kaplan-Meier analysis of the overall responses, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 12 months (P < 0.0001).

Urinary protein.
In the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group, the 24 h UP level decreased by a median of -2.76 g/L (IQR, -5.42 to -0.00 g/L) at 6 months, and the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group had a remarkably reduced UP by 5.62 (IQR, -10.22 to -0.40 g/L, P = 0.001, Table 2, Fig. 4A). At the 12th month of follow-up, proteinuria decreased by a median of  Fig. 4A).
Serum albumin. At the 6-month follow-up, there was a statistically significant difference in serum albumin between the groups (IQR was 0.52 to 14.17 g/l and 2.03 to 13.45 g/l in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml and C TAC > 5 ng/ml groups, respectively) (P = 0.021, Table 2, Fig. 4B). At the end of 12 months, the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group had remarkably increased serum albumin compared with the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group. Serum albumin increased by a median of 8.76 g/l (IQR, 3.37 to 16.72 g/l) and 9.98 g/l (IQR, 3.69 to 16.07 g/l) in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml and C TAC > 5 ng/ml groups, respectively (P = 0.008, Table 2, Fig. 4B).

Serum creatinine.
The Scr level in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group decreased by a median of 4.75 μmol/L (IQR, -16.00 to 18.3 μmol/L) at 6 months, and the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group increased by 6.69 μmol/L (IQR, -12.45 to 11.73 μmol/L) (P = 0.62, Table 2). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the concentration of Scr at the end of the trial (the IQR was -23.1 to 24.46 μmol/L and -17.06 to 24.18 μmol/L in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml and C TAC > 5 ng/ml groups, respectively) (P = 0.315, Table 2). There was no end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in any group.   (Table 3). During the 12-month treatment, the main adverse reactions of the two groups of patients included urinary tract infections, bacterial pneumonia, acute reversible nephrotoxicity, persistent nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal symptoms, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and glucose intolerance. No patient died or progressed to ESRD during the follow-up. Four patients (3%) with diabetes were observed in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group, and 8 patients (6%) were observed in the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group (P = 0.036, Table 3). All of them received oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin treatment, and the blood glucose levels in two patients returned to normal after TAC withdrawal in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group. In addition, the hazards of glucose intolerance considered separately were approximately two-fold lower in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group than in the C TAC > 5 ng/ ml group (P = 0.005, Table 3). The incidence of hepatotoxicity, presented as an elevation of ALT (78-235 IU/l; normal: 7-40 U/l) and AST (86-286 IU/l; normal: 13-35 IU/l), [2% (2/125) versus 4% (5/135) P = 0.0036] was significantly lower in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group than in the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group. Acute reversible or persistent nephrotoxicity was observed in 40 patients. All episodes were observed within the first 2 months of therapy. The incidence of acute reversible nephrotoxicity [8 vs 16% (18/31), P < 0.001)] was significantly lower in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group than in the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group, while there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding persistent nephrotoxicity (P = 0.225, Table 3). The differences in the rates of infections, urinary tract infections, and bacterial pneumonia in the two groups were not statistically significant.

Discussion
Treatment of IMN remains a challenge for nephrologists. Recently, IMN has come to be regarded as a kind of glomerular damage mediated by autoantibodies to the antigenic components of the podocyte membrane 11 . TAC stabilizes the podocyte cytoskeleton by inhibiting the expression of calcine phosphatase and the transient receptor potential cation channel 6 (TRPC6) protein, resulting in reduced urinary protein levels 12,13 . TAC alleviates nephrotic syndrome in the majority (80%) of IMN patients 7,14 . TAC has been reported to be effective in treating IMN patients with either monotherapy or in combination with corticosteroids 15-20 . More importantly, some studies have also shown that TAC plays an important role in corticosteroid-resistant primary glomerulopathy 21,22 .  www.nature.com/scientificreports/ However, none of these studies were concerned about the exact relationship between TAC levels and drug efficacy. Therefore, we believe that our study is important because it represents the first retrospective and observational study to address this knowledge gap. With the identification of this concentration-effect relationship of TAC in patients with MN, new opportunities have emerged to optimise treatment and reduce costs. Although TAC concentrations vary widely between patients, with an AUC of 0.859, a drug level of 5 ng/mL has a predictive value of good clinical response according to the overall response criteria. At 5 ng/mL, a sensitivity of 80.18% and a specificity of 0% were found. Since there are also other reasons for non-response in addition to low drug levels, in other words, there are non-responders with adequate or high drug levels, specificity is not likely to be very high in our population. We compared the efficacy and safety of different serum TAC concentrations in patients with IMN. Although we observed that the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group had remarkably higher overall response rates than the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group at month 6, there was no difference in the treatment outcomes between the two groups at month 12. These results are similar to those of the 2020 KDIGO. It is very common for patients receiving CNIs to experience nephrotoxicity. After cessation of CNIs, the nephrotoxicity is reversible in most patients. However, a small number of people have irreversible nephrotoxicity and develop chronic kidney disease. After 12 months of treatment, the histologically confirmed incidence of CNI nephrotoxicity (clinical + subclinical) was 76.4% in patients who underwent a biopsy 23 . TAC nephrotoxicity occurred in approximately 25% of the patients in the current study, with an incidence similar to that reported in various other studies 18,24 . Moreover, compared with the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group, acute reversible nephrotoxicity was more likely to occur in the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group. In addition, 0.74% (1/135) of the patients who developed persistent nephrotoxicity were classified as CKD (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m 2 for 3 months or more) in the C TAC > 5 ng/ml group at the end of the follow-up, while none of the patients developed CKD in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ ml group at the end of the follow-up.
Furthermore, there was a higher rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance in the C TAC > 5 ng/ ml group than in the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml population. These results are supported by emerging evidence that TAC affects calcineurin, a central signalling controller in eukaryotes 25 , which results in multisystemic side effects such as pathological glycaemia 26,27 . In the secondary outcome measures, the present study found that the C TAC > 5 ng/ ml group was superior to the C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml group for improvements in 24 h proteinuria and serum albumin.
This study had several limitations. First, the course of therapy and follow-up were quite short; thus, the long-term AEs of high concentrations of TAC remain to be investigated. Second, missing data were inevitable. However, they would tend to bias the results towards the null hypothesis. Therefore, more multicentre controlled randomized clinical trials should be conducted in the future to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of TAC for IMN. In addition, the serum concentration of the TAC may influence the decrease or negativization of anti-PLA2R and at the same time, that this influences the clinical outcomes.
In conclusion, C TAC > 5 ng/ml was more effective than C TAC ≤ 5 ng/ml in terms of the PR and CR in treating IMN patients with NS at 6 months, but there was no difference in the CR between the two groups at 12 months. Since high concentrations of TAC are associated with more AEs, we recommend reducing the concentration of TAC as far as possible to reduce the incidence of AEs while not affecting the patient's chance of achieving a long-term CR. This conclusion is worthy of further clinical investigation.