{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01673228346456693, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005905511811023622, 'mean_word_length': 5.163636363636364, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
LARVAL HABITAT AND REINTRODUCTION SITE SELECTION FOR CICINDELA PURITANA IN CONNECTICUT

Abstract For Cicindela puritana to be a viable member of New England's biota, there must be more than the current two occurrences. Assessment of the chance that the species can spread, whether on its own or through reintroduction, required identifying vacant habitat patches, which in turn, required refining the description of the species' larval habitat. Analysis of larval microhabitat variables identified sand texture as the most important determinant of habitat suitability. I then surveyed a 79 km stretch of the Connecticut River in Connecticut looking for suitable habitat patches. Of 32 beaches, none that appeared to be suitable was nearer than 12 km from currently occupied patches. Dispersal is unlikely to lead to establishment of new populations, so I recommend reintroducing C. puritana to an area in the vicinity of Windsor, CT where there are beaches on three islands that appear to be suitable larval habitat.