{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018306636155606407, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.130841121495327, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Israel, The Korean War and China: Images, Decisions and Consequences

account for diverse analytical purposes. Her book may now be read as a reliable and systematic guide to the documentary record itself. What is there for the political scientist particularly to note in a history of industrial relations under colonial rule? To begin with, the employers were large international firms, and since there is an ongoing debate about how progressive or reactionary such firms may have been during the colonial era, students of that question would do well to read this book. They will find that the companies, the colonial government, and the African workers favored racially exclusive unions in opposition to the white miners' union, which wanted a racially united union, a closed shop contract, and a policy of equal pay for equal work. Careful readers will discover that sound trade union principles may lend themselves to reactionary uses in colonial situations. In colonial settler societies all industrial relationships are distorted by the mechanisms of national or racial domination. This is not exactly news. But succinct and definitive studies, like Berger's, ought to be read by those who venture to make broader assessments of the relationship between capital and labor in ethnically divided communities.