{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.046153846153846156, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020118343195266272, 'mean_word_length': 4.385350318471337, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Verulamium Excavations Volume III

In view of the second criticism above it may be useful to point out some errors. P. 8: the idea that each contubernium in a legion was commanded by a 'decurion' (= Vegetius's decanus) is unsupported by other evidence. P. 8: Arrian's column did not march 20 but 4 abreast. P. 9: tribunes of praetorian cohorts had 6 centurions, not '6 more tribunes' under them. P. 10: Vegetius does not say that each legionary cohort was commanded by a tribune, only that some were. P. 10: senatorial legates were not finally abolished until Gallienus—so Aurelius Victor and the epigraphic evidence, e.g. RIB 334. P. 23: the accounts of Trajan's Dacian battles are based on a very literal (and controversial) interpretation of Trajan's Column—-Hulpe may not be the site of one of the battles described, and Legion XXI Rapax was, according to Ritterling, destroyed under Domitian. P. 43: the identification of the shield designs on Trajan's Column derived from Rossi is suspect. P. 52-5: the Notitia shields: Seeck's argument that the unit names attached to the insignia of the magistri militum are often misplaced is ignored; cf. especially the diagrams in Seeck's introduction to the text, pp. xxiii—xxv, where an attempt is made to give some correct attributions for the first three pages of the insignia of the magister peditum praesentalis in the West. P. 86: the Vand Z-rod Pictish symbols are plausibly interpreted as broken spears, and if so are only appropriate to funeral monuments (cf. the articles by Charles Thomas in Arch. Journ. lxviii (1961) and cxx (1963)). Fig. 92: the scramasax is drawn as if the straight-sided cutting edge were the back of the weapon.