{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03825857519788918, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021767810026385226, 'mean_word_length': 4.639405204460966, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bone responses to simvastatin-loaded porous implant surfaces in an ovariectomized model.

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to investigate bone responses to simvastatin-loaded porous implant surfaces in an ovariectomized model.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Roughened implants were divided into a control group (n = 32), test group 1 (n = 32), and test group 2 (n = 32). Test implants were immersed into 10?7 mol/L (test group 1) or 10?6 mol/L (test group 2) simvastatin solutions for drug adsorption onto implant surfaces. Forty-eight ovariectomized rats randomly received an implant in each tibia. One, 2, 4, and 12 weeks later, the tibiae were retrieved and prepared for histomorphometric evaluation. Bone-to-implant contact and bone area around the implant were determined, and histologic observations were made.


RESULTS
New bone formation on test implant surfaces was seen after 1 week, while it was seen on the control implant surface after 2 weeks. There was more bone tissue and bone-to-implant contact along the test implant surfaces than along the control implant surface. The test group 1 and test group 2 implants showed significantly greater bone area and bone-to-implant contact compared to the control implant at all observed time points (P < .05). No differences were found between the two types of test group implants after 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks (P > .05).


CONCLUSION
Simvastatin-loaded porous implant surfaces have the potential to improve implant osseointegration in an ovariectomized rat model.