{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012830793905372895, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009623095429029671, 'mean_word_length': 5.5, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Influence of restoration age on egg bank richness and composition: an ex situ experiment


 Zooplankton community assembly after flooding in temporary ponds depends mostly on abundance and diversity of the dormant propagule bank. However, our understanding of the hatching patterns of zooplankton is imperfect. We performed an ex situ experiment to study the species composition and temporal sequence of zooplankton emergence from sediments in three ponds that were restored at different times: 1998, 2003 and 2007. The patterns of species hatching observed in our microcosms were compared with the emergent zooplankton community of their equivalent, synchronically inundated ponds. An escalation in species richness and a delay in hatching time were detected with increasing restoration age. In addition, some discrepancies between the egg bank and active populations were observed, especially in the oldest pond. This study illustrates the use of hatching experiments in comparing ponds with different characteristics. Nevertheless, egg bank hatching and water column sampling should complement each other in order to afford a full reflection of past diversity and contribute to a better understanding of the efficiency of restoration practices.