{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027358490566037737, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0037735849056603774, 'mean_word_length': 4.894444444444445, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The HMO report card: a closer look.

Prologue: In the current volatile health care environment, there is a vast amount of data generated from the government, academia, advocacy groups, and the press on the implications of various policy changes and on the effects of new trends. Despite this wealth of information, though, there are very few specifics on the attitudes of people affected by the changes. Humphrey Taylor and Michael Kagay, polling professionals at Louis Harris and Associates, are among the few people to have gathered such information. In the following article, Taylor and Kagay summarize a poll conducted last summer for the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation on the attitudes of physicians, employers, and the public towards health maintenance organizations (HMOs). This is the second such effort by Harris for the Kaiser Foundation—the first was carried out in 1980—so that Taylor and Kagay are able to present some valuable trend data. Specifically, the authors have found that interest in HMOs by non-HMO members has continued to increa...