{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.006711409395973154, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.136986301369863, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Why Pragmatists Should Not Be Cyborgs

By examining the influential work of the historian of science and feminist theorist Donna Haraway, I argue for the pragmatic importance of respecting the distinctions between myth and science and between fact and fiction. My aim is to show that the classical pragmatism of Peirce and James provides a via medina between the enforcement of entrenched dichotomies and the morass of complete boundary confusion.