{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02410518626734843, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009495982468955442, 'mean_word_length': 5.171171171171171, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bringing the Regions Back In: A Study of Sub-National Variation in Quality of Government in 172 EU Regions

This paper explores the importance of sub-national vis-a-vis national differences in good governance, control of corruption or what in the literature is known as quality of government (QoG). Methodologically the paper uses both a large-N quantitative analysis and qualitative case studies to elucidate variation in QoG across and within E.U. countries. We also introduce novel sub-national data for 172 E.U. regions based on survey of 34,000 residents across 18 countries, which constitutes the largest multi-country survey on QoG at the regional level to date. The paper shows, first, that there are notable differences in the level of quality of government across EU regions; second, that those differences, despite being inherently difficult to capture, can be measured with sufficient accuracy and are resistant to the most stringent robustness checks available; third, that those differences in quality of government decisively matter for explaining the different socio-economic development of EU countries and regions; and fourth, that there are institutions and policies shared by the administrations of the best performing EU regions that have been traditionally overlooked by both academics and policy-makers and that should be in the political agenda.