{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021998166819431713, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02016498625114574, 'mean_word_length': 5.578313253012048, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cost effectiveness of low-molecular weight heparin versus warfarin following hip replacement surgery.

Little information is available on the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) versus warfarin for treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following hip replacement surgery. Still less is known of the comparative cost effectiveness of these two therapies. A retrospective study was done on 56 patients who underwent elective hip surgery at an urban medical center between 1991 and 1996. All patients received enoxaparin or warfarin for purposes of thromboprophylaxis. An analysis of medication cost, therapy, laboratory monitoring, and bleeding events of the two antithrombolytic agents was undertaken. Total savings with enoxaparin averaged $1253 per patient, or $137,886 over the study period. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism was 0% with enoxaparin and 3% with warfarin. These data indicate that enoxaparin is a more cost-effective and efficacious regimen for thromboprophylaxis following hip replacement surgery than warfarin.