{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03042328042328042, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007936507936507936, 'mean_word_length': 5.582608695652174, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Stanislavsky and the impact of studio ethics on everyday life

This article reviews Stanislavsky's studio practice through Henri Lefebvre's theories of everyday life. It broadens the scope of performer training by identifying the everyday as a further locus where its impact can be recognised. Three different ways through which studio practice impacts on everyday life – namely, the ‘surface’, ‘technical’, and ‘ethical’ levels – are evaluated. Notwithstanding its overt romantic and idealistic tone, Stanislavsky's ethics are proposed as a possible paradigm in mapping future considerations on performer training. The lectures which Stanislavsky delivered at the Bolshoi Opera Studio (1918–22) serve as the major case study to illustrate this exposition.