{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032490974729241874, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.303030303030303, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Opportunities for Change

IT WOULD BE NAIVE TO IMAGINE THAT THE FARM BILL could be radically overhauled during any single negotiation cycle (i.e., New Zealand-style). Considering everything at stake—our health, food, and environment—one might think that the forces opposing corporate industrial food and farming (conservationists, family farm advocates, and anti-hunger groups) could constitute a united front for change. More often than not, however, reform groups have remained divided, winning important concessions for their own special interests only to make an unsatisfactory system slightly less bad. At the same time, the agribusiness and food industry lobbies are unconstrained, farm states wield too much power, and entitlement programs are too entrenched. It is easy to see Farm Bill negotiations as a fully-rigged game.