{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03292181069958848, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019661636945587563, 'mean_word_length': 5.0777777777777775, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Novel Elastic Syndesmosis Hook Plate Fixation Versus Routine Screw Fixation for Syndesmosis Injury

ABSTRACT Unstable external‐rotation type ankle fractures with concomitant syndesmosis injury commonly occur. Syndesmosis screw fixation has long been regarded as a reference standard treatment for syndesmosis injury. However, its complications and biomechanical disadvantages have become controversial; thus, we designed a novel elastic syndesmosis hook plate (ESHP) that combines the features of both rigidity and flexibility. The purpose of the present study was to introduce this new method and compare its clinical outcomes with those of routine screw fixation. We randomized 25 patients to the screw fixation group and ESHP group. The average follow‐up period was 12 months. The clinical outcomes included malreduction or loss of reduction, overall complications, and function. During the follow‐up period, 3 cases (25%) of malreduction were found in screw fixation group on postoperative computed tomography. In the ESHP group, only 1 patient (7.69%) had a narrowed anterior gap between the distal tibia and fibula. However, the difference in the malreduction rate between the 2 groups was not significant statistically (p = .32). The overall complication rate in the ESHP group was lower than that in the screw group, although no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. The mean visual analog scale scores in the ESHP and screw groups were 1.46 ± 1.33 and 2.42 ± 2.07, respectively. The average dorsiflexion range of motion in both groups was satisfactory (14.77° versus 12.83°; p = .16). However, a statistically significant difference was found in the plantarflexion range of motion between the 2 groups (p < .05). In addition, the ESHP group had an earlier time to return to work (p < .05). The ESHP fixation construct can stably fix syndesmosis, retain the physiologic micromotion function of the syndesmosis, and results in fewer complications compared with routine syndesmosis screw fixation for syndesmotic instability. In conclusion, our results have shown ESHP to be a viable method for treatment of syndesmosis instability. Level of Clinical Evidence: 4