{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02114029468289558, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007046764894298526, 'mean_word_length': 5.973214285714286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Verbal Consultation Regarding Prescription Drugs: Findings from a Statewide Study

In 1984 the Wisconsin Division of Health showed interest in patients' receipt of verbal consultation for prescription drugs and included relevant questions in the Wisconsin Health Status survey to: 1) investigate the receipt of verbal consultation for new and refill prescriptions, 2) allow a comparison of state results with those of a national study that used similar sampling and data collection procedures, and 3) more closely examine the relationships between receipt of verbal consultation and such variables as prescription status (new or refill), age, sex, race, and education. Data were collected from 2,135 randomly selected respondents using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing with random digit dialing. After controlling for elapsed time since last prescription, log-linear analyses showed the importance of prescription status (new and refill) and respondent's age as correlates of consultation by pharmacy personnel, while prescription status, age, and sex were significant for prescribers. For both prescribers and pharmacy personnel, the authors found no association between client education and receipt of verbal consultation. The absence of verbal consultation cannot be entirely accounted for by client characteristics or prescription status. Based upon their experience, the authors encourage continued monitoring of prescribers' and pharmacists' provision of verbal consultation through questions contained in state and national health status surveys.