{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017045454545454544, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.588785046728972, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Bounty Hunting and Human-Agent Group Task Allocation

Much research has been done to apply auctions, markets, and negotiation mechanisms to solve the multiagent task allocation problem. However, there has been very little work on human-agent group task allocation. We believe that the notion of bounty hunting has good properties for human-agent group interaction in dynamic task allocation problems. We use previous experimental results comparing bounty hunting with auction-like methods to argue why it would be particularly adept at handling scenarios with unreliable collaborators and unexpectedly hard tasks: scenarios we believe highlight difficulties involved in working with humans collaborators.