{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01519434628975265, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0035335689045936395, 'mean_word_length': 5.645539906103286, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Assessment of pharmacy technician job satisfaction and duties in ambulatory care pharmacy settings: A mixed-methods analysis.

DISCLAIMER
In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.


PURPOSE
Expansion of pharmacy services into ambulatory care has prompted the integration of pharmacy technicians into this setting. Many models exist for technician practice in ambulatory care, and job satisfaction in these settings needs evaluation. This study assessed the job satisfaction of ambulatory care pharmacy technicians, obtained a deeper understanding of their varied roles, and examined commitment to the pharmacy technician career and their employing organization.


METHODS
This study used a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design of quantitative followed by qualitative data analysis. The phases included a validated questionnaire on job satisfaction and semistructured interviews using a modified guide and findings from the quantitative data. Descriptive statistics and constant comparative analysis were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, and data were integrated in the discussion.


RESULTS
The questionnaire was sent to 125 potential participants at 11 organizations in 8 unique states. Seventy-four technicians participated in the quantitative phase. Seventeen of these were interviewed in the qualitative phase. Interviewees represented 7 different institutions in 6 states in the Southeast, Midwest, and Western regions of the US. Both phases indicated that respondents felt a strong commitment to their organization, with 60% of respondents indicating this on the questionnaire. Reasons for this commitment were further elucidated in the qualitative phase, which indicated high satisfaction with technician autonomy, work schedules, and ability to provide important services to patients. It was also found in both phases that technician duties varied greatly among organizations, although most technicians were involved in facilitating medication access.


CONCLUSION
Ambulatory care pharmacy technicians are highly satisfied with their positions and careers. Although technician roles vary within ambulatory care settings, the majority involve facilitating medication access in various ways. As these positions become more prevalent in pharmacy practice, it will be important to continue to capitalize on satisfiers and mitigate dissatisfiers to advance the profession and ultimately provide optimal patient care.