{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023722627737226276, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013686131386861315, 'mean_word_length': 4.7434554973821985, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Mf Scale as an Index of Disturbed Marital Interaction: A Replication

Osborne (1971) found that couples in group psychotherapy in whom the husband scored 20 or more T score points higher than his wife on scale 5 (Mf) of the MMPI scored significantly higher only on scale D (p 10 and < 20 were excluded from the study in order to have more well-defined groups. Pre-therapy mean MMPI scores' for couples with high and low Mf indices differed only on the Si scale (introversion-extraversion) on which couples with a high Mf index were significantly higher (p L .05) than those with a low index. This significant difference quite likely could appear by chance since 12 comparisons were made. A similar chance factor also could have occurred in Osborne's study. Furthermore, since the Si scale in no way reflects distress, but measures social interaction tendencies, there does not appear to be any evidence to support Osborne's assumption that couples with a high Mf index were experiencing more distress on initiating psychotherapy for marital difficulties than couples obtaining a low Mf index.