{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02039329934450109, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.082474226804123, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Improved selectivity and sensitivity in the visualization of neurofibrillary tangles, plaques and neuropil threads.

Stain sensitivity is a key factor in estimating the frequency of plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease (AD), making it essential that the sensitivity and selectivity of detection methods for identifying these lesions is maximized. Several new, improved techniques have recently been described, although these methods have not been compared quantitatively with those techniques currently recommended for use in standardized diagnostic protocols. In the present study, eight different stains were examined for their selectivity and sensitivity in detecting plaques and tangles in serial tissue sections from AD and control brains. Techniques compared were immunohistochemistry for tau and beta-amyloid, thioflavin S, nickel peroxidase method, and four silver impregnation techniques (Gallyas silver iodide, Campbell-Switzer-Martin, Garvey's modified Bielschowsky and methenamine silver methods). Among these eight staining techniques, the nickel peroxidase proved the most reliable method for the demonstration of the histopathological lesions of AD. This method labels all morphological types of plaques and tangles within a single tissue section, and provides several advantages for the analysis of lesion progression and distribution.