{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.040345821325648415, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025936599423631124, 'mean_word_length': 4.887005649717514, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparison Study of Spinal Anesthesia with General Anesthesia in Cesarean Section

Background: The present study was conducted to compare spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia in cesarean section. Subjects and Methods: The present study was conducted in the department of Anesthesiology. It comprised of 78 pregnant women with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grade I or II who were scheduled to undergo elective CS under SA. Patients were divided into 2 groups. In both groups, side-effects after surgery such as nausea, vomiting, headache, pain and other clinical symptoms were noted. Results: The mean WBC count in group I was 12.74 109/L and 10.62 109/L in group II which was significant (P 0.05). In group I most common complication was fever (6) and hypotension (6) while in group II, fever (8) and hypotension (7). However, the difference was non- significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Both spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia showed variations in hematological parameters as well as complications.