{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02512562814070352, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.532786885245901, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the fourth-order cumulants estimation for the HO blind separation of cyclostationary sources

Most of the HO blind source separation methods developed this last decade aim at blindly separating statistically independent sources, assumed stationary and ergodic. Nevertheless, in many situations such as in radiocommunications, the sources are non-stationary and very often (quasi)-cyclostationary (digital modulations). In these contexts, it is important to wonder if the performance of these HO blind source separation methods may be affected by the potential non-stationarity of the sources. The purpose of this paper is to bring some answers to this question through the behaviour analysis of the empirical fourth-order cumulant estimators in the presence of (quasi)-cyclostationary sources.