{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02481389578163772, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0024813895781637717, 'mean_word_length': 6.074561403508772, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Foundational Needs of Forecasters for Probabilistic Winter Forecasting


This study explores forecaster perceptions of emerging needs for probabilistic fore-casting of winter-weather hazards through a nationwide survey disseminated to National Weather Service (NWS) forecasters. Questions addressed four relevant thematic areas: (1) messaging timelines for specific hazards, (2) modeling needs, (3) current preparedness to interpret and communicate probabilistic winter information and (4) winter forecasting tools. The results suggest that winter hazards are messaged on varying time scales that sometimes don’t match the needs of stake-holders. Most participants responded favorably to the idea of incorporating new hazard-specific regional ensemble guidance to fill gaps in the winter forecasting process. Forecasters provided recommendations for ensemble run length and output frequencies that would be needed to capture individual winter hazards. Qualitatively, forecasters expressed more difficulties communicating, rather than interpreting, probabilistic winter-hazard information. Differences in training and the need for social-science-driven practices were identified as a few of the drivers limiting forecasters’ ability to provide strategic winter messaging. In the future, forecasters are looking for new winter tools to address forecasting difficulties, enhance stakeholder partnerships, and also be useful to the local community. On the regional scale, an ensemble system could potentially accommodate these needs and provide specialized guidance on timing and sensitive/high-impact winter events.