{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027133973996608253, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011871113623516111, 'mean_word_length': 5.124567474048443, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Predictive modelling physico-chemical properties groundwater in coastal plain area of Vinh Linh and Gio Linh districts of Quang Tri Province, Vietnam


 This paper presents to study the performance of machine learning techniques consisting of Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS), Feed Forward Neural Network-Back Propagation (FFNN-BP), and Decision Tree Regression (DTR) for estimating physico-chemical properties groundwater in coastal plain area in Vinh Linh and Gio Linh districts of Quang Tri province of Vietnam. With the amount of 290 groundwater samples collected in two districts, this study has identified three main elements CO2, Ca, CaCO3 for simulation. Quantitative analysis results have shown that these three components are such as CaCO3 with from 0 to 25.8 mg/l, Ca from 0 to 87.55 mg/l and CO2 from 0 to 12 mg/l. In the present examination, groundwater quality index (GQI) values and their representative categories have been referred by the Vietnam Groundwater Standard (QCVN01). Furthermore, the statistical accuracy parameters were used to compare among models. To deploy the FFNN-BP and DTR, different types of transfer and kernel functions were tested, respectively. Determining the results of MARS, FFNN-BP and DTR showed that three models have suitable carrying out for forecasting water quality components. Comparison of outcomes of MARS model with FFNN-BP, DTR models indicated that this model has good performance for forecasting the elements of water quality, its level of accuracy was slightly more than other. To assess the accurate values of the models according to the measurement parameters for training phase illustrated that order models were MARS to give the best result, followed by DTR and finally FFNN-BP, respectively.