{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036556603773584904, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008254716981132075, 'mean_word_length': 4.895833333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Savonarola and Florence: Prophecy and Patriotism in the Renaissance

introduction to the central notions of Cusanus' metaphysical theology. Unfortunately, though S. expressly affirms an intrinsic continuity in Cusanus' thought, he seldom attempts to show how its various apparent incompatibilities and (at least) verbal contradictions are to be reconciled. Instead, different doctrines are eclectically placed in a row next to one another as though complementary. If the book argues a thesis, it is that non aliud represents, in the opinion of Cusanus, the ultimate and most adequate possible notion of God that we can attain (cf., e.g., pp. 5, 129, 169). In this regard, S. tends to overlook the utterings on the notion of posse ipsum, which Nicolaus later developed and of which he also explicitly predicated the very same privilege.