{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030149381801162292, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022777799446156245, 'mean_word_length': 4.6965118862475, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Structural insights into the translational infidelity mechanism

The decoding of mRNA on the ribosome is the least accurate process during genetic information transfer. Here we propose a unified decoding mechanism based on 11 high-resolution X-ray structures of the 70S ribosome that explains the occurrence of missense errors during translation. We determined ribosome structures in rare states where incorrect tRNAs were incorporated into the peptidyl-tRNA-binding site. These structures show that in the codon–anticodon duplex, a G·U mismatch adopts the Watson–Crick geometry, indicating a shift in the tautomeric equilibrium or ionization of the nucleobase. Additional structures with mismatches in the 70S decoding centre show that the binding of any tRNA induces identical rearrangements in the centre, which favours either isosteric or close to the Watson–Crick geometry codon–anticodon pairs. Overall, the results suggest that a mismatch escapes discrimination by preserving the shape of a Watson–Crick pair and indicate that geometric selection via tautomerism or ionization dominates the translational infidelity mechanism.

T he misincorporation of amino acids into a polypeptide chain caused by incorrect decoding accounts for most missense errors during translation 1,2 . A comprehensive estimation of missense errors has always been a formidable experimental challenge due to the difficulties in detecting errors that constitute a small background in comparison with the abundance of correctly synthesized proteins. Today, the average efficiency of miscoding is estimated to be as high as 10 À 3 -10 À 4 per amino-acid site 1,3,4 . Under normal physiological conditions, 18% of the proteins expressed from an average 400-codon-long gene contain at least one misincorporated amino acid 5 . More often, misincorporation is not deleterious and is important for the selective pressure on coding sequence evolution and cell fitness 5 ; nevertheless, 10-50% of random substitutions affect protein function 1,6 . In bacteria and higher organisms, the rate of missense errors is similar, reflecting the universality of the genetic code.
In recent decades, X-ray crystallography has remained indispensable for understanding the molecular mechanisms of biological processes. Here we present several high-resolution structures of Thermus thermophilus 70S ribosomes programmed by templates carrying missense errors. The collection of our structures puts forward a decoding mechanism that, for the first time, sets the molecular basis behind the phenomenon of translational infidelity and is in good agreement with in vivo studies of the missense errors that occur during protein synthesis 4,7,8 .

Results
Mismatches in the peptidyl-tRNA-binding site. We have successfully solved the structure of the 70S ribosome in two post-incorporation states (Fig. 1). In one case, we modelled the post-incorporation state based on the well-known in vitro miscoding system where polyuridylic acid served as a template and the leucyl-tRNA 2 Leu served as a substrate for polyleucine synthesis (Fig. 1a,b) 9,10 . In this complex, the GAG anticodon of tRNA 2 Leu formed two simultaneous GU mismatches with the first and third positions of the phenylalanine UUU codon in the peptidyl-tRNA-binding site (P-site; Fig. 2a,b). Another messenger RNA (mRNA) construct and tRNA Tyr let us model the second GU mismatch with the cysteine codon UGC and the anticodon QUA bound in the P-site (Figs 1c and 2c). The structures of both states (Supplementary Table 1) revealed the remarkable finding that a GU mismatch mimics a canonical Watson-Crick pair at either of the first two positions of the codon-anticodon duplex (Fig. 2b,c). Further analysis showed that the codon-anticodon duplexes containing GU mismatches have an overall geometry that is identical to that of the corresponding cognate duplexes consisting of standard Watson-Crick pairs ( Supplementary  Fig. 1a) 11 . Moreover, we did not find any changes in the ribosomal environment (that is, A790, G926 and C1400 of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA); ref. 12) of the near-cognate duplexes in the P-site. These results are particularly striking because in contrast to the restrictive decoding centre, where a GU mismatch adopts the Watson-Crick geometry because of conserved ribosomal elements 13 , the P-site does not impose any obvious constraints on the codon-anticodon duplex that are discernible at 3 Å resolution. Nevertheless, ribosomal parts tightly hold the P-site transfer RNA 12,14 with 16S residues forming A-minor groove-like contacts with two base pairs of the anticodon stem and with residue 790 blocking the anticodon stem on the other side ( Supplementary Fig. 1b). In addition, C1400 in 16S rRNA stacks over the base pair at the third codonanticodon position and G966 forms van der Waals contacts with the ribose of the 34th tRNA nucleotide (Supplementary Fig. 1b). At the same time, the mRNA path is also constrained by the ribosome by a bend (the E/P-kink) 11,14 at the phosphate between the last ( À 1) and the first ( þ 1) nucleotides that is stabilized by hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the P-codon is fixed by several interactions of the ribosome with its sugar-phosphate backbone ( Supplementary Fig. 1c,d).
Mismatches in the aminoacyl-tRNA-binding site. To expand our previous findings 13 , we investigated non-Watson-Crick pairs other than the GU mismatch in the 70S ribosomal decoding centre. For this study, we chose a 'challenging' pyrimidine-purine mismatch, CA, and a purine-purine mismatch, AA, and we solved seven high-resolution structures where these mispairs were placed at either of the first two positions of a codon-anticodon duplex in the aminoacyl-tRNA-binding site (A-site) (Supplementary Table 1). We also solved a control structure to demonstrate that the decoding centre is specific in our system and can only bind cognate tRNA or near-cognate tRNA that resembles cognate substrates. In this control complex, where mRNA programmed the ribosome with the AAA codon in the A-site and where tRNA Phe with the GAG anticodon was given as a substrate, no binding of tRNA Phe to the A-site was detected (Supplementary Table 1).
The analysis of the models reinforced one of our earlier significant findings that the binding of near-cognate and cognate tRNA to the 70S ribosome induces identical rearrangements of (i) the small ribosomal subunit (that is, shift of the shoulder domain by 2-3 Å) and (ii) the decoding centre itself ( 13 . Independently of which near-cognate tRNA was present in the centre, the conserved A1493 and A1492/G530 of the 16S rRNA stabilized the first and second codon-anticodon pairs in a manner identical to that of the cognate models (Figs 3 and 4). In addition, the conserved A1913 of helix 69 (H69) in the 23S rRNA stabilized the first codon-anticodon position through contacts with the 37th nucleotide of the near-cognate and cognate tRNA anticodon loops 14,15 .
A close-up analysis at every mismatch revealed that despite the stabilization of the sugar-phosphate backbones by A-minor groove interactions with the A1492/1493 and G530 of the 16S rRNA, the nitrogen bases of the AA and CA mispairs did not interact stably (Figs 3 and 4; see Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, the CA mismatch at the first codon-anticodon position was shifted from the Watson-Crick geometry; however, the shift did not quite reach the wobble position, possibly reflecting a metastable or average state (Fig. 3a). The resulting interatomic distances and putative bond angles of the mismatch suggested that the formation of hydrogen bonds was highly unlikely. When the first CA mismatch was modelled with tRNA Tyr , the presence of a queuosine modification 16 , which was not visible in previous structures of tRNA Tyr 13 , at the first anticodon position led to the displacement of the cytosine from the codon-anticodon helix (Fig. 3b) and distortion of the latter. This change emphasized the lack of stable interactions in the CA mispair and pointed to an amending role of tRNA modifications in translational accuracy. The base pair geometry of the CA at the second codonanticodon position was very similar to that of the first CA mismatch in the absence of queuosine (Fig. 3c).
No definite density signal was observed for the base of the mRNA adenosine in the structure with the first AA mispair in the codon-anticodon duplex, demonstrating its mobility (Fig. 4a). One of the possible conformations could be stabilized by the queuosine of tRNA Tyr (as was the case for the first cytosine (Fig. 3b); however, any interaction with the anticodon adenosine was unlikely. The structure with the AA mismatch at the second codon-anticodon position provided further evidence of the canonical constraints of the 70S decoding centre. Limited by A1492/G530 and stacking interactions with the standard Watson-Crick pairs at the first and third duplex positions, the adenosine of mRNA was found in the syn conformation with its Hoogsteen plane exposed to the Watson-Crick surface of the opposing adenosine in tRNA (Fig. 4b). Nevertheless, interatomic distances of 43.6 Å excluded possibility of strong interactions between the two adenosines, stressing the fact that the 70S decoding centre suppresses the formation of non-Watson-Crick pairs by restrictive steric and geometrical constraints.
We also determined structures with the AA and CA mismatches at the first and second positions of the codonanticodon duplexes, respectively, in the presence of the miscoding aminoglycoside paromomycin. Binding of the antibiotic did not affect the geometry of the mismatches and resulted in the same relaxation of the decoding pocket and shift of H69 towards tRNA that we described previously ( Supplementary Fig. 4) 13 .

Discussion
The results obtained for the GU mismatches presented here as well as those that were previously published 13 are closely related to the work of Topal and Fresco, who discussed base-pairing schemes and attempted to explain translational errors 17 . Their work extended the hypothesis of Watson and Crick, who suggested that spontaneous mutagenesis in replication is caused by a base adopting one of its rare tautomeric forms 18 . Topal and Fresco implied that a non-Watson-Crick pair matching the dimensions of a canonical Watson-Crick pair should be accepted and expressed by the ribosome. They also postulated that the internal ribosome environment influences the keto-enol tautomeric equilibrium of mRNA and tRNA by locking the isomeric state after binding to the ribosome. In some cases, it leads to the rare enol tautomers being favoured over the more abundant keto isomers 17 (Fig. 2d).
Although the 3 Å resolution of our models is not sufficient to distinguish between the two tautomeric forms, the observed Watson-Crick-like geometries for the GU pairs can be rationalized by the presence of enol tautomers in the P-site (Fig. 2d). Most likely the formation of minor tautomers of G or U either in mRNA or in tRNA happens before their binding to the ribosome, that is, in solution. While this paper was under review, NMR relaxation dispersion measurements showed that in RNA duplexes a wobble GU pair exists in dynamic equilibrium with short-lived, low-populated Watson-Crick-like pairs that are stabilized by rare enolic or anionic bases (see page 318 in ref. 19). Our present structure with the P-site GU mismatches trapped in a Watson-Crick geometry, as well as the previous report 13  Missense error  geometries, fully support these observations. According to the NMR relaxation dispersion calculations, frequencies of occurrence of minor enolic or anionic bases spans the range of 10 À 3 -10 À 5 that are not far from the accepted translation error rate of 10 À 3 -10 À 4 (refs 3,4).
In an analogous fashion to the mRNA P/A-kink 13,14,20 , the mRNA constraints between the E-codon and P-codon 11,14 together with the tight ribosome grip surrounding the tRNA anticodon stem-loop 12,14 contribute to the fixing of the P-site codon-anticodon mini-helix in place ( Supplementary Fig. 2b-d). Thus, this fixation would restrain the first codon nucleotide from the shift necessary to form a wobble pair. For the second codonanticodon position, a bend caused by a wobble GU pair would be also forbidden because the tight shape of the codon-anticodon mini-helix is defined by the tRNA anticodon rigid structure and a tertiary structure of tRNA stabilized by the ribosome 12,14 .
However, the above scheme with the assumption of an equal occurrence of tautomers or anionic bases at all the three codon or anticodon positions does not explain the presence of a G34U3 pair in a standard wobble geometry at the third position of the codon-anticodon duplex ( Supplementary Fig. 2a). It seems likely that, compared with the two other anticodon positions fixed by stacking interactions, the tRNA nucleotide 34 that forms the third pair exhibits some extent of freedom due to its apical location in the U-turn fold of an anticodon loop 21 (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Its chemical state can also be dictated by the composition of the loop, including modifications 22,23 .
The present results suggest that the extent of molecular adaptability allowing a non-complementary pair to form an isosteric pair with the Watson-Crick-like geometry defines the probability and efficiency of a miscoding event. We can infer that among the described complexes, those ribosomes bearing mRNA and tRNA with GU mismatches would be by far the most stable 24 , while those bearing CA and AA mismatches would be less homogeneous and less stable. In the context of the kinetic scheme of decoding 3 , such complexes will be prone to dissociation rather than translocation. Recently published studies dealing with the in vivo frequencies of mismatches in translation ranked GU, UU or CU mismatches as the most frequent, and AA and CA mispairs as the least probable errors during protein synthesis 4,8 , fully in accordance with the conclusions derived from our structural data.
Taken together, the present structures along with our earlier models of the 70S ribosome primed by long templates and native  tRNA 11,13,15 provide an extensive library of various states of the P-site and the decoding centre on the 70S ribosome. Our models suggest an advanced mechanism of decoding that, for the first time, describes how a missense error can skip discrimination, leading to translational infidelity (Fig. 5). Although our structures were obtained in a non-enzymatic system, numerous lines of experimental data support the unified principles that underlie the basic functions of the ribosome and hence allow us to generalize the proposed mechanism.
For the present mechanism of decoding ( Fig. 5), we want to emphasize the crucial role of the large ribosomal subunit and, in particular, its helix 69 that forms the intersubunit bridge B2a (ref. 25) and acts as a regulator of nucleotide A1492 of the 16S rRNA in the decoding centre 15 . The tRNA selection begins with the binding of tRNA to the unoccupied centre (Fig. 5a, i), which is predisposed to accept tRNA 26 . In this unoccupied centre, A1493 protrudes from helix 44 of the 16S rRNA and is ready to interact with the minor grove of the first pair of the codon-anticodon duplex. Furthermore, A1492 stacks over A1913 in H69 of the 23S rRNA 15 (Fig. 5b, left). The kink of the mRNA between the P-and A-codons pre-positions the sugar phosphate of the first nucleotide so that it cannot be displaced towards the major groove of the codon-anticodon mini-helix 11,13,14,20 . Further tightening of the centre occurs independently of the cognate or near-cognate tRNA nature and can be described by two major rearrangements of the ribosome (Fig. 5a, ii). First, on tRNA binding, the anticodon loop contacts the tip of H69 in the 23S rRNA and apparently disrupts the A1492/A1913 stacking (Supplementary Movie). As a result, A1492 and A1913 undergo local rearrangements, resulting in the formation of minor groove ARTICLE interactions between A1492 and the second codon position (Fig. 5b, middle). These rearrangements essentially define the decoding pocket from the side of mRNA. The second rearrangement is the slight movement of the shoulder domain of the small subunit towards the anticodon loop that brings together G530 (which switches its conformation from syn to anti) with the second anticodon position and finalizes the formation of the decoding centre (Fig. 5b, middle). Considering early evidence of non-enzymatic polypeptide synthesis 27,28 , we suggest that the shoulder movement represents inherent ribosomal dynamics ( Fig. 5c; Supplementary Movie) that underlies other essential functions of the ribosome, such as the translocation assisted by spontaneous ratcheting and swivelling of the small subunit 29 . Most likely, this inherent movement of the shoulder domain is locked on tRNA binding in a state that completes the formation of the discriminatory centre. However, the detailed kinetics of this rearrangement remains an open question. A codon-anticodon duplex entrapped in the decoding centre is then tested for steric complementarity to the restrictive mould of the decoding centre. In this framework, cognate tRNA will be efficiently incorporated because of its ability to form stable Watson-Crick pairs with the first two codon positions. Most near-cognate tRNAs will be sorted off due to steric clashes within a codon-anticodon pair or with limiting constraints of the centre like in the case of a standard wobble GU pair ( Supplementary  Fig. 5) and the large free-energy cost required to fit in the centre (Fig. 5a, i-ii). However, a few of the erroneous RNA molecules will escape discrimination because of their capability to form Watson-Crick-like interactions. During the final steps of selection, some of these near-cognate tRNA molecules can still dissociate from the ribosome due to the instability of the formed pairing interactions (Fig. 5a, ii-iii). As we proposed earlier 15 , the extensions of some ribosomal proteins can perform an additional 'discriminatory' role against near-cognate tRNA at this step (Fig. 5d). In the steady-state enzymatic system, the falloff of tRNA would lead to non-productive hydrolysis of GTP by elongation factor Tu 30 , which catalyses the tRNA delivery to the ribosome and hydrolyses GTP after establishing the codon-anticodon interactions in the decoding centre (Fig. 5a). However, some near-cognate pairs, such as the GU pair, will maintain Watson-Crick geometry via rare tautomeric or anionic forms and will be accommodated in the decoding centre and further translocated to the P-site, resulting in misincorporation of an amino acid into a polypeptide chain (Fig. 5a, iv). This scenario agrees with the studies of the tRNA selection process using the single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer approach 31,32 and fits well into the contemporary kinetic scheme of the process that suggests that decoding on the ribosome is evolutionally optimized towards a higher speed of translation at the cost of fidelity 3 .
Our data provide evidence that steric complementarity and shape acceptance but not the number of hydrogen bonds between the decoding centre and a codon-anticodon duplex play the discriminatory role during decoding 33 . Our translational infidelity mechanism finds support in recent studies where multiple 2 0 -fluoro substitutions in mRNA disrupting the hydrogen bonds between the mRNA codon and the decoding centre only had a modest effect on the tRNA selection efficiency 34 . Our models further reinforce the specific role of tautomerism or base ionization in infidelity mechanisms of other biological processes, such as DNA replication 35,36 , and we propose an original view of the phenomena that may involve non-canonical Watson-Crick pairs, for example, in noncanonical decoding 37,38 or during the initiation from alternative start codons 39,40 .

Methods
Ribosome purification and complex formation. The 70S ribosomes from the T. thermophilus strain H8 were purified according to the following protocol.
The cells (100 g) were washed with 1 l of buffer A (150 mM MgCl 2 , 500 mM NH 4 Cl, 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1.5 mM EDTA-Na 2 , 1 mM DTT) and then resuspended in 100 ml of the same buffer. All the procedures were performed at 4°C. DNase (1 unit per ml) together with phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (1 mg ml À 1 ) were added and the cells were disrupted by the French Press (or microfluidizer). The ribosomes (500 mg) were loaded on a 200-ml column of Toyopearl Butyl 650S equilibrated in buffer C (10 mM MgCl 2 , 400 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA-Na 2 , 1 mM DTT) containing 1 M (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 . The column was washed with two volumes of buffer C with 0.8 M (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and the ribosomes were then eluted by 900 ml of a reverse gradient of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 (from 80 to 40%) keeping other components of buffer C constant (the flow rate 6 ml min -1 , the fraction volume 12 ml). The peak of 70S ribosomes was collected and concentrations of (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 and MgCl 2 were adjusted to 1 M and 50 mM, respectively. The 70S peak was then concentrated by step-wise elution from 200 ml Toyopearl Butyl 650S equilibrated in buffer C containing 1 M (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 . Finally, Uncharged native individual tRNA Phe , tRNA Tyr and tRNA fMet from Escherichia coli were purchased from Chemical Block (Russia). All mRNA constructs whose  (i-iv) indicate sequential steps of the process (see the text). (b) Conformation of the main nucleotides of the decoding centre without tRNA (left), bound by cognate or near-cognate aa-tRNA at the initial recognition step 45 (middle) and at the final step of accommodation (right). The crucial nucleotides of 16S and 23S rRNA are shown in cyan and red, respectively. Ribosomal protein S12, which belongs to the shoulder domain of the small ribosomal subunit and additionally restricts the second codon-anticodon pair 46 , is depicted in green. The three nucleotides of the mRNA codon in the A-site are numbered according to the standard system (see legend to Fig. 2). (c) Overall states of the small ribosomal subunit during selection of tRNA. The left panel pictures spontaneous movement of the shoulder domain (black arrows) when the decoding centre is unoccupied; the middle and right panels show that the shoulder is shifted and stabilized on binding of near-cognate tRNA during the initial selection step and further accommodation (see text); sh, h, pl denote the shoulder, head and platform domains of the small ribosomal subunit, respectively. (d) Strengthening of cognate tRNA binding by protein tails from the small (S) and large (L) ribosomal subunits. Fastening of cognate tRNA in the A-site is also represented by formation of the additional intersubunit bridge between protein L31 and proteins S13 and S19 (PDB codes 3I8H and 3I8I sequences are specified below were from Thermo Scientific (USA) and deprotected following the supplier procedure. Aminoglycoside antibiotic paromomycin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The ribosomal complexes were formed in 10 mM Tris-acetate, 40 mM KCl, 7.5 mM Mg(CH 3 COO) 2 , 0.5 mM DTT at pH 7.0 at 37°C. For all complexes, the 70S ribosomes (3 mM) were incubated with fivefold stoichiometric excess of mRNA and three to fivefold excess of tRNA. For the complexes containing the GU mismatches in the P-site, the 70S ribosomes (3 mM) were incubated with mRNA-1 and tRNA 2 Leu or mRNA-2 and tRNA Tyr (Fig. 1b,c) for 15 min. For comparison of the near-cognate complexes with GU at the first codon-anticodon position, we used our previous model of the 70S ribosome with cognate tRNA Phe bound to the UUU codon in the P-site 11 (Fig. 1b). For the second GU mismatch, we made a separate control complex by incubating 70S ribosomes with mRNA-3 and tRNA Tyr (Fig. 1c).
The 70S ribosomes (3 mM) were pre-incubated with mRNA-4, mRNA-5, mRNA-6, mRNA-7 or mRNA-8 and tRNA fMet for 15 min to fill the P-site. The complexes modelling the CA mismatch at the first and second codon-anticodon positions were obtained by incubating tRNA Phe with the 70S/tRNA fMet /mRNA-4 and 70S/tRNA fMet /mRNA-6 mixtures, respectively, for 30 min. The CA mismatch at the first position was also prepared by incubation of the 70S/tRNA fMet /mRNA-5 mixture with tRNA Tyr . The complexes with the AA mismatch at the first and second codon-anticodon positions were made by addition of tRNA Tyr and tRNA Phe to the 70S/tRNA fMet /mRNA-7 and 70S/tRNA fMet /mRNA-8 mixtures, respectively, and incubated as described above.
Data collection, processing and structure determination. Data for all complexes were collected at the PXI beamline of Swiss Light Source, Switzerland, at 100 K. A very low dose mode was used and huge redundancy data were collected 41 . The data were processed and scaled using XDS 42 . All crystals belong to space group P2 1 2 1 2 1 and contain two ribosomes per asymmetric unit. One of the previously published structures 13 , with tRNA, mRNA and metal ions removed, was used for refinement with Phenix 43 . The initial model was placed within each data set by rigid body refinement with each biopolymer chain as a rigid body. This was followed by initial coordinate refinement. The resulting electron density maps were inspected in Coot 44 and the tRNA and mRNA ligands were built in. During several cycles of manual rebuilding followed by coordinate and isotropic B-factor refinement, magnesium ions were added and the final refinement round took place. The data collection and refinement as well as model geometry statistics are presented in Supplementary Table 1.