{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009233610341643583, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.691358024691358, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effective Implementation of the Watershed Management Approach for Adjudicated Ground Water Basins in California

The watershed management initiative (WMI) is quickly being adopted as a new paradigm for the protection of water resources in the United States. Initially, this approach appears to focus largely on the protection and management of surface water and habitat resources within a watershed framework. However, inevitably there must also be some consideration given to the effects on the availability and quality of ground water resources. Implementation of a watershed management approach in California will necessarily involve the integration of a wide variety of both parallel and conflicting interests among users of the watershed. The regulation and management of wetlands have raised conflicting legal issues regarding property rights across the country. What may be more unique to southern California watersheds is the degree to which watershed management plans must integrate existing requirements governing water resources located in adjudicated ground water basins.