{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017006802721088437, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.51875, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
THE SUBJECT OF THE QUESTION IN MAONIC SCIENCE AND ITS CLASSIFICATION

The topic of the talk and its classification are one of the central issues of syntax. This article compares the classification of the Arabic alphabet with the Arabic and Uzbek linguistic norms. In terms of the stylistics of the Uzbek language, it is explained in terms of how the spelling of the Arabic word begins, and the classification of the Muslim in terms of the context. It is emphasized in Maonic science that the most important aspect of non- speaking in other languages, especially in the Arabian minority, is the purpose of the speaker and the state of the listener. In Maonical Science there is information on classification in relation to reality, the goal of the speaker and the status of the listener, and in the so-called interpreter, to be a change in reality, and to choose the types of speech.