{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031171019376579612, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018534119629317607, 'mean_word_length': 5.527472527472527, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Review Article : A tale of two cultures and other higher superstitions

Over the last 30 years, leftist humanists and social scientists have increasingly challenged the authority that the natural sciences enjoy throughout society, especially in the academy. Originally, most of these challenges concerned the role that natural scientists played in weapons research, environmental degradation, and gender and racial discrimination. However, recently more principled challenges have been made to the very content and method of science by a group of interdisciplinary scholars in the field of ’Science & Technology Studies’, or STS (Fuller, 1993). Until a couple of years ago, scientists largely ignored this mounting body of work in their own public writings. However, in 1992, two prominent works of science popularization, Wolpert (1992) and Weinberg (1992), devoted entire chapters to describing the threat posed by the academic left critique of science, conveying the general impression that it constituted a frontal assault on ’civilization as we know it’ (Fuller, 1994, offers an STS response). Paul Gross and Norman Levitt, a distinguished American biologist and mathematician, have