{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04225352112676056, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01056338028169014, 'mean_word_length': 5.393258426966292, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Intelligence 2.0 in I–O Psychology: Revival or Contextualization?

As long as completing one’s duties, getting one’s job done, and being successful in an organization requires intelligence in some form, a renewed interest in intelligence in industrial–organizational (I–O) research can advance the field, both theoretically and practically. We agree with this view that is well expressed by Scherbaum, Goldstein, Yusko, Ryan, and Hanges (2012). However, we think that the focal article is stronger in reviewing the field than in defining new approaches. We explore one