{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024777006937561942, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02973240832507433, 'mean_word_length': 4.706214689265536, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Design and implementation of the stavudine parallel-track program.

In a randomized, double-blind, large, simple trial, the safety and efficacy of two weight-adjusted dose levels of stavudine were evaluated in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. All patients were refractory to or intolerant of both zidovudine and didanosine. Patients weighing > or = 60 kg received 20 or 40 mg of stavudine twice daily. The dose was reduced to 15 or 30 mg for patients weighing 40-59 kg and to 10 or 20 mg for those weighing < 40 kg. The primary efficacy end points were survival and time to clinical progression of HIV disease. The primary safety end point was time to dose-limiting neuropathy. A total of 8127 patients were enrolled as of 31 July 1993. Although many patients who might have benefitted from stavudine were reached by the parallel-track program, a review of demographic data revealed disproportionate representation by white men from large metropolitan areas on both coasts.