{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036420395421436005, 'fraction_numerical': 0.031217481789802288, 'mean_word_length': 4.172043010752688, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Satyam Story: Many Questions and A Few Answers

On January 2, 2009, Mr. Raju disclosed to the stock exchange that his family had pledged all its shares held in its holding firm, SRSR Limited, to institutional lenders, following which, in the next two days, the share of the Raju family in Satyam fell from 8.6 per cent to 3.6 per cent. During the intervening period, three of the independent Directors at Satyam resigned. On January 7, Mr. Raju confessed to his crime and absolved all the top functionaries of Satyam stating that they had no clue as to what was being done by him to orchestrate the elaborate fraud. Mr. Raju’s letter to the board stated that Satyam’s balance sheet as on September 30, 2008, carried fictitious cash and a bank balance of Rs. 5,040 crore. In addition, it carried an equally made-up accrued interest of Rs. 376 crore. There was an understated liability of Rs. 1,230 crore and an over-stated debtors’ position of Rs. 490 crore.