{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02802241793434748, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.28140703517588, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Intra-host versus inter-host selection: viral strategies of immune function impairment.

We investigate the evolution of viral strategies to counteract immunological attack. These strategies can be divided into two classes: those that impair the immune response inside or at the surface of a virus-infected cell and those that impair the immune response outside an infected cell. The former strategies confer a "selfish" individual selective advantage for intra-host competition among viruses. The latter strategies confer an "unselfish" selective advantage to the virus population as a group. A mutant, defective in the gene coding for the extracellular immune function-impairment strategy, may be protected from immune attack because the wild-type virus in the same host successfully impairs the host's immune function. Such "unselfish" defense strategies are neutral with respect to intra-host competition. We present simple models of viral intra-host and combined inter- and intra-host evolution. We show that selfish strategies can evolve by intra-host evolution. Unselfish strategies may evolve if inter-host selection pressures outweigh intra-host selection, suggesting that such strategies can only evolve in viruses with low mutation rates.