{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025244299674267102, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003257328990228013, 'mean_word_length': 4.93719806763285, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sociology beyond despair: Recovery of nerve, endogeneity, and epistemic intervention

Abstract Sociology as a scholarly vocation within the university in South Africa is bedevilled with the claims of its demise. Both the discipline and a cross-section of its practitioners seem beset with ‘status anxiety’ and what I call ‘status ambiguity’ In this presidential address, delivered to the 2005 Congress of the South African Sociological Association (SASA), I examine these claims. The paper examines the sources of the anxiety. It argues that the claims of sociology's death are grossly exaggerated, as Mark Twain might have put it. I argue that if we were to operate on a wider canvas we might have persuaded ourselves to the position that the ebbs and flows in a discipline like sociology are not evidence of ‘death’, ‘fall’ or whatever else we might want to call it; it is not even an evidence of a discipline that is yet to attain maturity. The key to doing ‘sociology beyond despair’ and the recovery of disciplinary nerve requires a commitment to endogeneity, with a distinct commitment to epistemic intervention in global sociology; it requires us to take our locales seriously; it requires us to take ourselves seriously.