{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022099447513812154, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.751322751322752, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sanatana Dharma and (Post)modernity

Postmodernism is passe. The best and simplest proof of its obsolescence is the fact that the western academy has left it behind. It is now a late, not latest, fad. As a matter of fact, even in India we have moved on to talking about other things such as globalization and governance. It used to be that whatever is current here had to be obsolete over there: that was the simple logic of postcolonial intellectual production. We were unable to initiate a single intellectual movement of importance because we were always waiting for our directions from abroad. But in the last ten years, this dependency has altered somewhat. A lot of it had to do with India's economic resurgence because of which the sense of intellectual inferiority has lessened a bit, especially in the fields of IT, science and technology, business and commerce. Powerful Indian diasporas, especially in the United States, have broken through the glass ceilings, giving humbler folks back home some hope. In spite of these changes, the overall structural inequality between the