{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04, 'fraction_numerical': 0.037894736842105266, 'mean_word_length': 4.471264367816092, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Rawlinson B 502 alias Lebar Glinne Dá Locha: a Restatement of the Case

In 1981, 1982, and again in 1985, I defended the view that Rawlinson B 502, henceforth R, and Lebar Glinne Da Locha, 'the Book of Glendalough', henceforth LGDL, were different names for the same manuscript. However, despite the fact that this view has since found wide acceptance, C. Breatnach recently challenged it on six grounds, all of which, as I propose to show here, fail to stand up to scrutiny.