{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02506265664160401, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.962686567164179, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Dag Hammarskjöld, the United Nations and Africa

Once upon a time there was a Secretary‐General of the United Nations (UN), who was elected into office during the Cold War era because the big powers believed he was just a humble servant to their interests. – They were wrong. Even‐handedness, integrity, moral leadership, respect for otherness, loyalty to principles and ethical values, as enshrined in the UN Charter, were among the core values he represented. Dag Hammarskjold held a firm belief in the autonomy of the office of the UN Secretary‐ General and the Secretariat, which ought not to be degraded to a mere instrument and conference machinery serving the interests of the powerful states. Hammarskjold was determined not to surrender the power of definition to individual member states.