{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025688073394495414, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007339449541284404, 'mean_word_length': 5.825, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comment on “Ecological Footprint Policy? Land Use as an Environmental Indicator”

Van den Bergh and Grazi (2013) offer an assessment of ecological footprint accounting’s policy relevance. This important subject merits critical examination. Though their article contains many intriguing ideas, their argument is not structured to address the question they have raised. In order to determine whether ecological footprint accounting is policy relevant, at least four fundamental questions, addressed in a logical sequence, must be considered first: