{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028423772609819122, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00904392764857881, 'mean_word_length': 5.2, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reader Response: Prolonged Cardiac Monitoring and Stroke Recurrence: A Meta-analysis

Tsivgoulis et al.1 should be commended for this meta-analysis follow-up to their 2019 work, which demonstrates the utility of prolonged cardiac monitoring for the goal of stroke secondary prevention. For those of us who navigate these clinical waters on a regular basis, it is refreshing to read our daily conundrum so precisely summarized. It would be a welcome addition to this analysis to include other common heart rhythm markers of cardiopathy (AT, premature atrial contractions, and high-burden premature ventricular contraction) encountered on a short-term and 30-day monitors that are often used to justify the cost, risk, and inconvenience of implantable loop recorder (ILR) use.