{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024915824915824916, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006734006734006734, 'mean_word_length': 5.140495867768595, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pharmaceutical expenditure and total health-care expenditure in OECD countries and China: bidirectional Granger causality on the basis of health level

ABSTRACT Background: Previous studies have ignored the bidirectional causality and the heterogeneity of health level. This study explored the bidirectional causality between pharmaceutical expenditure (PE) and total health-care expenditure (Total HCE) considering the health level for effective health investment and national health improvement. Methods: Based on the panel data on PE and Total HCE in 32 OECD countries and China, the Granger causality test was applied. Countries were divided into low- and high-health-level (LH and HH) groups according to their life expectancies. Results: A 1% increase in the growth rate of per capita PE boosted a 0.11% increase in that of per capita Total HCE of the following year in HH group, whereas no such causality existed in LH group. A 1% increase in the growth rate of per capita Total HCE boosted a 0.46% increase in that of the per capita PE of the following year in LH group, whereas no such causality existed in HH group. Conclusion: High-health-level countries should continue to increase the health investment by promoting rational PE growth such as expanding insurance coverage for innovative medicine for health improvement. Low-health-level countries should take optimizing policy to increase health investment in pharmaceutical for medicine accessibility and national health.