{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020652173913043477, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013043478260869565, 'mean_word_length': 5.395833333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Incomplete privatisation and the porosity of public values; handling discrepancies between public values and privatised services, avoiding reverse privatisation, Paper for the Public values session, NIG conference November 8, 2007

This paper presents an attempt at a legal approach to addressing wrongful privatisations, avoiding reverse privatisation or even re-publitisation as answers to (unavoidable) negative discrepancies between public values and related public services. In no. 58 of the paper a short overview of the steps from the leading question to the concluding remarks is presented. This paper is still in the draft stages as especially footnotes and cases have not yet been fully elaborated, let alone finalised. This should not handicap the NIG debate of the 8 of November 2007. If, however, these shortcomings somehow do disturb reading, the author wishes to apologise sincerely for the inconvenience.