{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025796661608497723, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019726858877086494, 'mean_word_length': 5.280952380952381, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Experiences with a 3D4K digital exoscope system (ORBEYE) in a wide range of neurosurgical procedures.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS
Exoscopic 3D4K video systems (EX) have recently been introduced as an alternative to conventional operating microscopes (OM). However, experience in handling and setup remains scarce. This study evaluated the practicability of exoscopic surgery in a wide range of procedures.


MATERIAL AND METHODS
All EX operations performed between 08/2018 and 05/2020 were evaluated and compared to procedures using OM. A standardized questionnaire was used to evaluate surgeons' comfort, image quality (including fluorescence modes) and handling.


RESULTS
513 EX operations were during the investigated period. EX was generally rated as a valuable surgical tool. In particular, the digital 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence and the comfort level of posture during surgery were stated to be superior to OM (100 and 83%, respectively).


CONCLUSION
EX has been used for a significant number of neurosurgical procedures. While presuming that the technical methodology as such will not influence outcome of glioma surgery, proof of equipoise between different techniques expands the spectrum of surgical environments giving neurosurgeons a choice to work according to their preferred ergonomics.