{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.035880398671096346, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03122923588039867, 'mean_word_length': 5.223140495867769, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Unplanned urology readmissions in a district general hospital: are we meeting the standard?

Background Recent changes in practice standards and remuneration to UK Trusts have been refined to penalise institutions for patient readmission within 30 days of discharge. The purpose of this study was to determine if the target rate of less than 6.5% was attained within the setting of a district general hospital (DGH) and also to comment on readmission trends. Materials and methods A retrospective study was performed over 12 months examining all unplanned readmissions to hospital 30 days following discharge from Urology. Elective as well as emergency cases were audited. Results A total of 4124 patients were treated and discharged by the department over 12 months. One hundred and eighty-four (4.4%) patients were readmitted: 93 (51%) patients following acute presentations and 91 (49%) following elective procedures. The commonest causes for unplanned readmission were haematuria, 29 cases (16%), acute urinary retention, 28 cases (15%) and ureteric colic, 25 cases (14%). Readmission rates following flexible cystoscopy and TRUS biopsy were 1% and 3%, respectively. Only six of 70 patients (9%) were readmitted following TURP. Five (3%) of the 184 readmissions required a second procedure. Conclusion Our department met the predetermined standard in achieving an unplanned readmission rate of less than 6.5%. This study also highlighted the need for discharge policies for common acute presentations.