{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020872865275142316, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0018975332068311196, 'mean_word_length': 5.59375, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Primary angioplasty is elective reperfusion therapy in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Arguments in favor].

Thrombolytic treatment has demonstrated its efficacy on acute myocardial infarction. However, it cannot be used in a significant number of patients and it doesn't achieve adequate reperfusion in a great percentage of cases. Primary angioplasty, a treatment which can be used in the majority of acute myocardial infarction patients, obtains artery patency in more than 90% of cases, with a better perfusion in the infarct territory and fewer reocclusion rates compared to thrombolysis. Consequently, primary angioplasty is associated with a lower mortality rate, and a lower incidence of recurrent ischemia and hemorrhagic stroke during hospitalization. Coronary artery stents and new antiplatelet agents have improved the short-term and mid-term results of primary angioplasty. Currently, when the facilities and trained personal are available, primary angioplasty should be the treatment of choice in acute myocardial infarction.