{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015063731170336037, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.041958041958042, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Patient management problems Issues of validity

Patient management problems (PMP) are being used in medical examinations with increasing frequency despite evidence which throws doubt on their validity as measures of clinical competence. This study investigated the construct validity of a PMP constructed in both written and interview formats. Each test was administered to groups of students of different seniorities and to two groups of Docotor, interns and post‐interns. The pattern of scores for the different groups was not that expected of a valid test of competence. The most competent groups (the postinterns) generally scored less well on the calculated indices than the senior students and interns. These findings were similar for both formats of the test so cueing was not thought to be the major factor. It appears that the scoring system is at fault.