{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024822695035460994, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01773049645390071, 'mean_word_length': 5.364661654135339, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Expression and activation of ephexin is altered after spinal cord injury

Failure of axon regeneration after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is attributable in part to the presence of inhibitory molecular interactions. Recent evidence demonstrates that activation of Eph signaling pathways leads to modulation of growth cone dynamics and repulsion through the activation of ephexin, a novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF). However, little is known about the expression and modulation of Eph molecular targets in the injured spinal cord. In this study, we determined the expression profile of ephexin after a moderate spinal cord contusion at thoracic level (T10) in young adult rats. Western‐blot studies showed increased protein expression in injured rats at 4 and 7 days postinjury (DPI) when compared with control animals. The protein levels returned to normal at 14 DPI and remained steady until 28 DPI. However, immunoprecipitation studies of the phosphorylated ephexin demonstrated that this protein is activated by day 2 until 14 DPI. Expression of ephexin was noticeable in neurons, axons, microglia/macrophages, and reactive astrocytes, and co‐localized with EphA3, A4, and A7. These results demonstrate the presence of ephexin in the adult spinal cord and its activation after SCI. Therefore, we show, for the first time, the spatiotemporal pattern of ephexin expression and activation after contusive SCI. Collectively, our data support our previous findings on the putative nonpermissive roles of Eph receptors after SCI and the possible involvement of ephexin in the intracellular cascade of events. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 71: 595–607, 2011