{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026865671641791045, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.045045045045045, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Latin quisque as a “floating” quantifier

Abstract The Latin distributive pronoun quisque exhibits specific constraints on its position. These positional constraints contrast with the “floating” uses of the corresponding distributive pronouns of fixed word-order languages (Engl. each, Fr. chacun). My hypothesis is that constraints on word order reflect semantic and syntactic properties of quisque. In particular, when quisque is added to an NP, it shows up a bijective distributive relation between two sets of elements, so that an indirect quantification is produced. In this case I assume that quisque has actually become a specifier of the NP to which it is added.