{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022058823529411766, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014705882352941176, 'mean_word_length': 5.3533333333333335, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Towards the automatic analysis of 1H NMR spectra: Part 3. Confirmation of postulated chemical structure

A method is proposed which automatically compares experimental and predicted 1H chemical shifts, integrals and scalar couplings and allows the structure on which the predictions are based to be confirmed or refuted. The method is comparatively insensitive to the variable presence of labile protons but is sensitive to the reliability of chemical shift prediction. Nonetheless, even with current commercially available 1H chemical shift prediction, amongst a set of unrelated compounds the structure can be confirmed with 99% confidence. Where the compounds are closely related, the confidence decreases to approximately 60%, or 88% when labile protons are excluded. If closely related pairs are nominated explicitly, a specific criterion can be set for each pair, allowing every pair to be differentiated. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.