{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019002375296912115, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.534883720930233, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the origin of the halo stabilization.

Monte Carlo simulations show that charge-regulation alone can cause highly charged zirconium nanoparticles to adsorb to a similarly charged or neutral silica particle and thereby stabilizing the latter. This mechanism, referred to as halo stabilization, is quite general and applicable in a range of systems provided that pH, van der Waals forces, and dissociation constants of the charge-regulating particles are properly chosen. In our modeling we see an overall attraction at low volume fractions of nanoparticles, while at higher a repulsive barrier is created, stabilizing the microparticles and protecting them from aggregation. The charge-regulation mechanism also turns the silica surface from positively charged, without nanoparticles, to negatively charged in the presence of nanoparticles.