{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017191977077363897, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.9743589743589745, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Judicial Unification in Post-Colonial Indonesia

The reason for writing this article is to pull together scattered materials on the growth of a national judiciary in Indonesia during the Japanese occupation, the revolution, and early independence, and to put these materials in some perspective more useful than a merely legal one. This perspective is not in the first place a functional one, since the history of judicial integration had relatively little to do with the explicit work of courts. What it did have to do with, more than anything else, was the adoption of (and conflict over) new institutional symbols of authority that favored new ruling groups and new political and social visions.