{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03118201595358956, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01015228426395939, 'mean_word_length': 4.798319327731092, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Drug lymphocyte stimulation test is not useful for side effects of anti-tuberculosis drugs despite its timing.

BACKGROUND
Some patients have adverse reactions to anti-tuberculosis drugs. We have reported that drug lymphocyte stimulation testing (DLST), which we performed at Week 1 of adverse reactions, provides little useful information (14.9% sensitivity). However, it remains unclear whether the time of performance of the DLST contributed to these results.


METHODS
Patients with adverse reactions to anti-tuberculosis drugs, including rash, hepatitis and fever, underwent DLST in the first week of the adverse reaction and were then randomly assigned to Group A (among whom a second DLST was performed 2 months after the reaction) or Group B (among whom a second DLST was performed >12 months after the reaction). We compared Group A with Group B to determine the optimal timing for the performance of DLST. The causative drug was identified by an oral drug provocation test.


RESULTS
Consistent with the previous study, the sensitivity of DLST performed in the first week was low (14.3%). For DLST performed later, the sensitivity in Group A and Group B was respectively 5.0% and 6.7%.


CONCLUSIONS
DLST is not useful for determining the causative drug in patients with rash, hepatitis or fever reactions to anti-tuberculosis drugs, regardless of when it is performed.