{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.06384615384615384, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025384615384615384, 'mean_word_length': 5.195238095238095, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Motion Correction of Dual Volume Reconstruction of Three‑dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Follow‑up Evaluation of Intracranial Coiled Aneurysms

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of the “Motion Correction” function of the dual volume-3D-volume-rendering technique (DV-3D-VRT) in follow-up digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of intracranial coiled aneurysms. Materials and Methods: This study used data collected from consecutive, follow-up DSAs after the coiling of 64 intracranial aneurysms in 59 patients. We performed subtracted 3D-rotational angiographies (3D-RAs) on all DSAs and obtained DV-3D-VRT images. We then assessed recurrence using DV-3D-VRT images with and without the motion correction functions (MC(+) vs. MC(-)) and observed which method showed better agreement with the reference assessment (using a combination of 2D DSA and TOF MRA images). Results: The recurrence of MC(-) DV-3D-VRT images showed 51.6% (33/64) agreement with the reference assessment, whereas the MC(+) DV-3D-VRT images showed 78.1% (50/64) (P = 0.035, McNemar test). Conclusion: Motion correction is a useful complementary imaging technique in evaluating aneurysm recurrence after endovascular embolization. MC(+) DV-3D-VRT image showed higher inter-observer agreement than MC(-) DV-3D-VRT.