{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025817555938037865, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.0625, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
on the use and abuse of memory: habermas, "anamnestic solidarity," and the historikerstreit

The book of German history, remarkable for its absence of blank pages, is now being opened and scrutinized once again. Predictably, this reopening of the book of the German past has lead to a great deal of discord and contradiction; the Historikerstrelt, which arose primarily as a result of attempts to read this awful book selectively, also has reopened a series of unresolved questions concerning the nature of history, memory, and the relation between the present and the recent past.