{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027450980392156862, 'fraction_numerical': 0.000784313725490196, 'mean_word_length': 5.577319587628866, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Behavioral tagging as a mechanism for aversive‐memory formation under acute stress

The behavioral tagging (BT) hypothesis postulates that a weak learning experience, which only induces short‐term memory, may benefit from another event that provides plasticity‐related proteins (PRPs) to establish a long‐lasting memory. According to BT, the weak experience sets a transient learning tag at specific activated sites, and its temporal and spatial convergence with the PRPs allows the long‐term memory (LTM) formation. In this work, rats were subjected to a weak inhibitory avoidance (IAw) training and we observed that acute stress (elevated platform, EP) experienced 1 hr before IAw promoted IA‐LTM formation. This effect was dependent on glucocorticoid‐receptor activity as well as protein synthesis in the dorsal hippocampus. However, the same stress has negative effects on IA‐LTM formation when training is strong, probably by competing for necessary PRPs. Furthermore, our experiments showed that EP immediately after training did not impair the setting of the learning tag and even facilitated IA‐LTM formation. These findings reveal different impacts of a given acute stressful experience on the formation of an aversive memory that could be explained by BT processes.