{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028428093645484948, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.440860215053763, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Gradual Semantics for Weighted Graphs: An Unifying Approach

The paper bridges the gap between two general settings of gradual semantics for weighted argumentation graphs: the evaluation method setting (EMS) and the principle-based one (PBS). The former defines a semantics by three aggregation functions, each of which satisfies specific properties. The latter considers a semantics as any function that follows some high-level principles. The paper shows that (EMS) is one way of defining semantics that satisfy principles. Indeed, some principles follow from properties of aggregation functions.