{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.038461538461538464, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022222222222222223, 'mean_word_length': 5.209549071618037, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Overwhelming tPA release, not PAI-1 degradation, is responsible for hyperfibrinolysis in severely injured trauma patients

BACKGROUND Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is associated with a fourfold increased risk of mortality. Hyperfibrinolysis is a component of TIC, but its mechanism is poorly understood. Plasminogen activation inhibitor (PAI-1) degradation by activated protein C has been proposed as a mechanism for deregulation of the plasmin system in hemorrhagic shock, but in other settings of ischemia, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been shown to be elevated. We hypothesized that the hyperfibrinolysis in TIC is not the result of PAI-1 degradation but is driven by an increase in tPA, with resultant loss of PAI-1 activity through complexation with tPA. METHODS Eighty-six consecutive trauma activation patients had blood collected at the earliest time after injury and were screened for hyperfibrinolysis using thrombelastography (TEG). Twenty-five hyperfibrinolytic patients were compared with 14 healthy controls using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for active tPA, active PAI-1, and PAI-1/tPA complex. Blood was also subjected to TEG with exogenous tPA challenge as a functional assay for PAI-1 reserve. RESULTS Total levels of PAI-1 (the sum of the active PAI-1 species and its covalent complex with tPA) are not significantly different between hyperfibrinolytic trauma patients and healthy controls: median, 104 pM (interquartile range [IQR], 48–201 pM) versus 115 pM (IQR, 54–202 pM). The ratio of active to complexed PAI-1, however, was two orders of magnitude lower in hyperfibrinolytic patients than in controls. Conversely, total tPA levels (active + complex) were significantly higher in hyperfibrinolytic patients than in controls: 139 pM (IQR, 68–237 pM) versus 32 pM (IQR, 16–37 pM). Hyperfibrinolytic trauma patients displayed increased sensitivity to exogenous challenge with tPA (median LY30 of 66.8% compared with 9.6% for controls). CONCLUSION Depletion of PAI-1 in TIC is driven by an increase in tPA, not PAI-1 degradation. The tPA-challenged TEG, based on this principle, is a functional test for PAI-1 reserves. Exploration of the mechanism of up-regulation of tPA is critical to an understanding of hyperfibrinolysis in trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level II.