{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0218209179834462, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023325808878856283, 'mean_word_length': 5.683417085427136, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Extraperitoneal pelvioscopy in staging of bladder carcinoma and detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis.

This study was carried out to examine the efficacy of extraperitoneal pelvioscopy in detecting pelvic metastasis in patients scheduled to undergo radical cystectomy without preoperative chemo- or radiotherapy. The results of pelvioscopy were compared with those obtained by laparotomy. 54 consecutive patients underwent pelvioscopy without complications. Three were technically insufficient. Lymphatic tissue was biopsied in 29 (54%). Pelvioscopy demonstrated tumor dissemination in 5 patients (9.3%): 2 had pT4b tumor, 2 pelvic nodal metastases and 1 both. The remaining 49 patients with benign pelvioscopy were scheduled for laparotomy but 7 patients did not undergo the procedure: 3 had extrapelvic metastasis, 1 bronchial carcinoma, 1 aortic aneurysm, 1 refused surgery and 1 had pulmonary insufficiency. Accordingly, 42 patients underwent open exploration which demonstrated pelvic metastasis in 11: 9 had nodal metastasis, 1 a pT4b tumor and 1 both. Consequently the sensitivity of pelvioscopy in detecting pelvic metastasis was calculated at only 31%. This result indicates that extraperitoneal pelvioscopy should be considered a screening procedure rather than an accurate staging procedure for pelvic metastasis.