{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.056511056511056514, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014742014742014743, 'mean_word_length': 4.506756756756757, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Civil Strife in Latin America. By William Everett Kane. (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1972. Pp. ix, 240. Index. $10.00.)

William Everett Kane, a practicing lawyer whose study was prepared under the auspices of the American Society of International Law, says at the outset: "If one had to choose a one-word characterization of U.S.Latin American relations since the turn of the century,' intervention' would probably be the choice of a majority of Latin American scholars. If, on the other hand, legal scholars were forced to make a similar single-word choice to describe the inter-American system, ' nonintervention' would appear to be a likely candidate" (p. 1). The dichotomy—"The discrepancy between U.S. actions and U.S. legal commitments in the Western Hemisphere"— colors the remainder of this story.