{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03114754098360656, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009836065573770493, 'mean_word_length': 5.211195928753181, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Relative susceptibilities of the interchain disulfides of an immunoglobulin G molecule to reduction by dithiothreitol.

The reduction by dithiothreitol (DTT) of the four interchain disulfides of a human IgGlkappa immunoglobulin has been studied by two methods: variation of the concentration of DTT relative to the protein concentration (incremental reduction); and variation of the time of reduction at fixed levels of DTT and protein (kinetic reduction). In both cases, the results depend on whether the reduction is carried out aerobically or anaerobically. Under aerobic conditions, the relative levels of intermediates (HL, H2, and H2L) which are generated as native molecules (H2L2) are converted to reduced heavy (H) and light (L) chains depend on the concentrations of protein and DTT as well as on the exposure time to DTT; no stable equilibrium is reached between reduced and oxidized states and conditions gradually revert from those favoring reduction to those favoring reoxidation. By contrast, anaerobic reduction is independent of protein concentration or time of exposure to DTT, beyond about 30 min, indicating that an equilibrium between partially reduced and oxidized states is achieved. The distribution of intermediates observed under anaerobic conditions has been analyzed according to theoretical models (Sears, D.W., and Beychok, S. (1977), Biochemistry 16 (second in a series of three articles in this issue)). Within experimental error, both kinds of anaerobic experiments resemble a random reduction process wherein the four disulfides are equivalent and independent of each other with respect to rate and extent of reduction by D. It is concluded that there are no readily detected pathways in the process, as would occur if the intrinsic reactivities of the bonds were distinct, and no marked cooperatively between the four reaction sites, as would be observed if reduction of one bond materially facilitated or hampered reactivity at another site. Both of these characteristics of the reduction are in direct contrast to those of the reoxidative process, which is marked by the initial preference for formation of a bond between heavy and light chains, and by kinetic cooperativity in bond formation during the course of the reaction (Sears, D.W., et al. (1977), Biochemistry 16 (first in a series of three articles in this issue); Sears, D.W., and Beychok, S. (1977), Biochemistry 16 (second in this series)).