{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018072289156626505, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.23125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Battle for the Black Ballot: Smith v. Allwright and the Defeat of the Texas All-White Primary – By Charles L. Zelden

privacy policies may reflect an authoritarian regime’s Machiavellian attempt to please the masses. However, West does not consider the possibility that authoritarian regimes may simply post progressive privacy policies in order to encourage citizens to reveal personal data. Without transparency and accountability, it is impossible to determine whether the regime currently respects these posted policies, or would continue to do so if a future need arose to access these data. In sum, despite some minor concerns, this book offers the subfield much-needed generalizable empirical tests of some of the key issues related to electronic government. Over the next several years, citations of Digital Government will be found throughout the discipline as it becomes standard reading for all scholars interested in the impact of information technology on government performance.