{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02328589909443726, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.344262295081967, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
For Impurity in Philosophy: Some Programmatic Dicta

Recall Marx's famous remark, 'Philosophers have interpreted the world; the task is to change it.' Some have thought that here philosophy is being deliberately rejected, indeed repudiated, and what is taken up instead is political activism. The important point, such critics continue, is not about whether philosophy should have practical relevance, but about how philosophy is practically relevant. The claim is that people such as Marx, who argue for substantive claims with a normative import, inject an impurity into philosophy. They neglect and sometimes in effect repudiate its irreducibly Socratic character in trying to use it to give for some normative questions positive support for their own preferred answers.