{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.044349070100143065, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010014306151645207, 'mean_word_length': 5.60377358490566, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
THE CORPUS TIBULLIANUM AND ITS AUTHOR(S)

sense of the precise historical moment’ (p. 3), and as a ‘prism’ (p. 150) through which intellectuals read and interpreted contemporary events, imagined possible futures and even fashioned their own relationship towards monarchical authority, be it as royal adviser or prophet. The coexistence between politicised fashioning of Virgil and ‘Virgilian self-fashioning’ (p. 134), i.e. through and according to Virgil, well illustrates the hybrid nature of classical reception: classical texts are not only patients, passive undergoers, in the reception process but also influential agents conditioning the receivers’ interpretative and self-defining attitudes.