{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02346938775510204, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0020408163265306124, 'mean_word_length': 4.839285714285714, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Successful women in the sciences: an analysis of determinants.

"One thing is clear about those women regarded as successful in the United States. Women at the top are at the bottom of the top, just as they are at the bottom of any stratum in which they happen to be represented," reports Cynthia Epstein, in this unusual study of successful women scientists. At least, women can take some encouragement from the fact that the New York Academy of Sciences sponsored a three-day conference on the topic, in which the planners, chairpersons, and all but one of the speakers were successful women. The first part consists of 12 brief autobiographies of women, all of whom have been successful in such varied fields as architecture, electrical engineering, consumer science, and medicine. All are wives and mothers. Nearly all report career difficulties because of their sex, overcome by outstanding ability and effort. Most appear well satisified with their combination of career and