{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02526799387442573, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006125574272588055, 'mean_word_length': 4.9409090909090905, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The life course model as a framework for post-conflict health analysis: reflections on the Gulf War critical period

Abstract In the Kuwait context, from January 1991 to December 1991, there were a series of chemical and psychological Gulf War-era exposures that left persistent, long-term damage. Extreme stress from a critical event speeds up the usual disease latency period, and may be part of a synergistic effect that leads to higher disease rates over a shorter period of time. I am interested in the impact of armed conflict on health outcomes over the life course in Kuwait, and particularly the pathways through which armed conflict causes changes in health on a population level. In this paper, I propose a culturally sensitive, post-conflict socio-ecological model that informs a three-pronged health study. I propose a macro–micro mix that includes an ecological study, a case-control study and a qualitative study to investigate Kuwait’s post-conflict health concerns. Thus, I revise the concept of ‘post-conflict health’ as a trajectory that is mediated through different, complex social levels and develops over time during the latency period. The main advantage of a macro–micro mix approach for post-conflict health is that it contextualizes the Gulf War as an environmental health issue.