{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01962110960757781, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006089309878213802, 'mean_word_length': 5.515418502202643, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Indications for lowering platelet numbers in essential thrombocythemia.

Essential thrombocythemia (ET), one of the chronic myeloproliferative disorders, exposes individuals to significantly increased risk for thrombohemorrhagic complications. Epidemiologic data indicate that the two most prominent risk factors for thrombosis are age greater than 60 years or a history of or presentation with thrombosis at any age. Age is an important factor in selecting among therapeutic options, as the agents used to treat ET may contribute to acute leukemic transformation and other secondary malignancies. Whether or not hydroxyurea (HU) carries these risks is controversial and unresolved, but the uncertainty is a basis for avoiding it in young patients. Alternatives to HU that have established efficacy in lowering platelet counts in ET are interferon and anagrelide. Both are highly effective in reducing platelet numbers, and are apparently not associated with leukemogenicity or mutagenicity. However, approximately 30% of patients find interferon intolerable for long-term therapy. Anagrelide offers the advantage of oral dosing and long-term effectiveness at managing platelet counts. A recent long-term study of young ET patients treated with anagrelide found that all thrombohemorrhagic events occurred in patients with platelet counts greater than 0.4 x 10(9)/L, adding to the evidence that reduction of platelet counts to normal may be required for optimal control of risk.