{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018502202643171806, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003524229074889868, 'mean_word_length': 5.241758241758242, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evaluating a model of auditory masking for applications in audio coding

This investigation evaluates the adequacy of an excitation pattern (EP) model of auditory-masking to account for a masking condition commonly observed in the digital coding of audio signals: namely, the masking of quantization noise by either speech or musical sounds. This condition is modeled as a case of masking of a spectrally complex target by a multi-component complex masker (either speech or musical sounds). The evaluation focuses on the extent to which the EP model accounts for the 10-15 dB excess masking observed when multiple maskers occur simultaneously. Excitation-pattern predictions of the masking effects of two-component maskers were compared with predictions of masking-additivity models which closely predict experimental data. The EP model underestimates the combined effects of the two maskers both when the masker frequency components fall within the signal auditory-filter bandwidth, and when they fall outside this bandwidth. A correction for masking additivity may be needed prior to applying the EP model to audio-coding situations.