{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024366471734892786, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029239766081871343, 'mean_word_length': 5.224242424242425, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Impact of Revision 7 on the Technical Efficiency of Florida's Circuit Courts

In 1998 Florida voters approved Article V, Revision 7, which changed the state circuit courts from county/state funding to nearly full state funding during the 2004/05 fiscal year. Although increased efficiency was a goal of Revision 7, no published studies exist on the impacts of Revision 7 on court efficiency. Resource dependency and institutional theory, two open-natural system frameworks, are used to predict whether Florida's circuit courts have become more efficient over the policy span of Revision 7 (1993–2008). The results reveal that only 3 of 300 Florida circuits are technically efficient; the mean efficiency score is .76. Analysis of variance determined Florida circuits became significantly less efficient over time. Small- and medium-sized circuits lost efficiency, large circuits showed no change, and analysis of covariance modeling revealed a significant interaction effect between circuit size and the Revision 7 period.