{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027168234064785787, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0219435736677116, 'mean_word_length': 4.877300613496932, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
AN INFLAMMATION METER TO REVEAL THE PRESENCE AND EXTENT OF INFLAMMATION IN OLDER PATIENTS

and no significant difference in muscle area (Table 1) . We found a strong linear correlation between bone and muscle area in both groups of women (Figure 1). Women with osteoporotic fractures had bone areas lower than expected given their muscle areas. In linear regression analyses fitted separately for the two groups (Figure l), we found similar slopes (2.98 vs 2.73) but significantly different intercepts (32.29 vs 113.84; P < .0001). These findings suggest that the reduction in bone mass often observed in women with osteoporotic fractures is attributable to a primary bone-related pathophysiologic process. The bone/muscle ratio may help to identify women with true osteoporosis from those in whom reduction in bone mass is merely the consequence of severe sarcopenia in the context of ageassociated frailty and not a primary disturbance of bone metabolism.