{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027559055118110236, 'fraction_numerical': 0.018700787401574805, 'mean_word_length': 4.912790697674419, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Attitudes of Turkish psychiatrists towards DSM-III-R

In 1994, a 14 item Questionnaire was given to 111 Turkish psychiatrists to determine the attitudes towards DSM-III-R. About 97% of the psychiatrists stated that a descriptive classification system is necessary. Eighty-three percent of the psychiatrists used the DSM system, 11.7% the ICD and 5.3% neither of them. Axis I was used by 98.1%. A statistically significant relationship existed between the subjects' affiliation department and the theoretical orientation of their psychiatric education and the question if the DSM-III-R criteria are too detailed and complicated to use to get a diagnosis. It was also a significant relationship between the subjects' institution and the question if the DSM-III-R focuses on signs and symptoms so much that it detracts from a more in depth understanding of the patients' problems. We believe that national surveys on classification systems will have positive effects on the improvement of a common psychiatric language.