{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025487256371814093, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010494752623688156, 'mean_word_length': 4.758620689655173, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Range of medicine's responsibility.

The London Post this week comments on a letter published on January 7, 1972, in both the Lancet and the British Medical Journal. The reasons for the simultaneous publication must have been weighty, for such distinction is not usually accorded to the urgent revelations, indignant protests, and wry conceits that arrive in the editor's mail. Perhaps the letter was featured by both of Britain's great medical weeklies because it dealt with overpopulation. Perhaps the impressive list of 55 medical signatories was influential. But perhaps most persuasive was the purpose of the letter: to urge and press for action to contain . . .