{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03868471953578337, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019342359767891684, 'mean_word_length': 4.782122905027933, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a novel two-port technique for surgical residency training.

For the cosmetic benefits of patients, many institutions attempted to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with a minimum port. It has not yet been discussed whether the number of ports used in LC affect an outcome in a residency training program. We enrolled 101 patients consecutively. Eight freshmen (PGY1) performed 32 operations (13 cases with two-port, 23 cases with four-port). Clinical data were compared with the data by the senior staff. In the freshman group, the duration of surgery was longer in the two-port group than in the four-port group (P = 0.0297); however, there were no complications. In the two-port group, the freshman group took longer than the senior group (P = 0.0266). As for the volume of intraoperative bleeding, there was no statistical significance. Our two-port technique seems to be a feasible, effective, and safe technique for performing LC in the residency training program on selected patients.