{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02175264139216905, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0006215040397762585, 'mean_word_length': 5.388888888888889, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Analysis and Design of Current Control Schemes for LCL-Type Grid-Connected Inverter Based on a General Mathematical Model

For the LCL-type grid-connected inverter, there are basically three current control schemes, namely the grid current control, the inverter-side inductor current control, and the weighted average current control. This paper builds a general mathematical model to describe the three current control schemes. In this model, the grid current is an equivalent target control variable, the capacitor current feedback serves as a damping solution, and the computation and pulse-width modulation delays are taken into account. Based on the general mathematical model, a comparative analysis of different control schemes is carried out in terms of the grid current stability. It reveals that when the inverter-side inductor current is controlled, the grid current shows the same stability as the inverter-side inductor current; but when the weighted average current is controlled, both the grid current and the inverter-side inductor current are critically stable even though the weighted average current can be easily stabilized. Moreover, the general mathematical model also provides a unified perspective to design different control schemes, which makes the controller parameter tuning more straightforward and effective. In this way, a set of controller parameters which yields high robustness against the grid-impedance variation can be selected for all the three current control schemes. Finally, a 6-kW prototype is built, and experiments are performed to verify the theoretical analysis.