{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02042711234911792, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0018570102135561746, 'mean_word_length': 4.5, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Peer-Review Mentorship: What It Is and Why We Need It.

P EER REVIEW for journal publication is at the core of knowledge development in nursing science. Simply defined, peer review is the evaluation of a publication by a group of experts in the same scientific or academic field. But peer review is not without its flaws and has been likened to democracy, a system with many flaws but the best of bad options.1 When done well, the process can be engaging for the reviewer, as they learn about new and emerging work, and helpful for the author to strengthen and clarify their ideas. All of this begs the question: What is good peer review, really? How is it achieved? And how can we foster capacity to ensure good peer review? The purpose of peer review is to assist the editor to select high-quality publications for the journal at hand, to assist authors to strengthen works that have potential for publication, and to advise the editor when a publication is not ready or unsuitable.2 At its best, when papers are circulated to rigorous reviewers whose strengths and interests