{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015776699029126214, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.0661764705882355, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cultural Violence: A Preliminary Analysis of Rights and Duties

Restricting the rights of outgroups and the refusal to accept one’s duty to protect such groups can be a form of cultural violence. Even when individuals verbally report they support human rights, it may be the case that thinking about rights primes thoughts of individual—instead of group—protection. A first study validated the proposition that duties are associated more with groups and rights more with individuals. Next, across two studies, I tested to see if priming individuals to think about rights or duties would change their beliefs in terms of group support across a variety of dilemmas. My results showed that duties led to greater support for the collective, suggesting focusing on duties may be an important factor in reducing cultural violence.