{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02149805447470817, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005836575875486381, 'mean_word_length': 4.844798180784537, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Online Court Problems During the Covid-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Advocates in Providing Legal Assistance to Clients

. The World Health Organization (WHO), declared the outbreak of the spread of Covid-19 as the first and foremost health crisis pandemic in the world. Due to the pandemic, human life has changed including legal services provided by advocates where there are rules regarding online trials during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study uses empirical juridical research methods or field research, namely examining applicable legal provisions and what is happening in reality in society. The problems in this study are: 1. What are the advantages of online trials during the pandemic according to advocates in providing legal assistance to clients? 2. What are the shortcomings of online trials during the pandemic according to advocates in providing legal assistance to the clients? The results show that the advantages of online trials according to advocates include: 1. More practical and easier for the trial because it does not have to be present in court. 2. It is more efficient because case information is in one account. 3. More cost-effective while the disadvantages of online trials according to advocates include: 1. Signal interference and technological devices. 2. Lack of effective law enforcement. 3. Violating the provisions of procedural law in proving. So far, the law has always been far behind in the development of community needs, so progressive law is more open and responsive to changes and is not bound by written law. In this case, the law must be placed in the whole of humanity. Thus, the role of judges is more to ensure the fulfillment of community needs for justice and welfare. This means that the existence of the law should reflect the standard of what is good and bad, fair and unfair.


INTRODUCTION
A pandemic is a disease outbreak that spreads simultaneously everywhere, covering a wide geographical area. A pandemic is an epidemic that spreads to almost all countries or continents and usually affects many people. An increase in the number of diseases above normal usually occurs, this disease also occurs suddenly in the population of a certain geographic area. INCLAR Coronavirus is a virus that is generally found in animals and can cause animal or human disease, people who have been infected with this virus will easily spread it to other people, this disease is an infection that occurs in the respiratory tract ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). [1] Coronavirus The World Health Organization (WHO), declared the outbreak of the spread of Covid-19 as the first and foremost health crisis pandemic in the world. Corona Virus is a family of viruses found in humans and animals. Some of the viruses can infect humans and cause various diseases, ranging from common illnesses such as the flu, to more fatal diseases such as middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Covid-19 can cause mild and even severe phenomena as well as a transmission that can occur between humans. The coronavirus is sensitive to ultraviolet light and heat, and can be inactivated (effectively with almost any disinfectant except chlorhexidine). Therefore, hand sanitizers containing chlorhexidine are not recommended for use in this outbreak. [2] Therefore, hand sanitizers containing chlorhexidine are not recommended for use in this outbreak. Coronavirus is zoonotic, which means it is a virus that first developed in animals before finally infecting humans. When it infects humans, the spread of the Corona Virus can be through breathing. Splashes of stones or sneezes from people infected with the coronavirus will stick to the surface of objects or human skin. So that the virus will move when humans touch objects or make physical contact with other humans. Then, the virus will infect humans when hands contaminated by the virus touch the face, such as the mouth, nose, and eyes. [3] INCLAR Advocates in Article 1 paragraph (1) of Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates   define Advocates are people who have the profession of providing legal services, both inside and outside the court who meet the requirements based on the provisions of this Law. Advocate comes from the word Advocaat (Dutch) which is someone who is officially appointed to carry out his profession after obtaining a Meester in de Rechten (Mr) degree. If we draw it further, the word comes from the Latin word advocates. Therefore, it is not surprising that in almost every language in the world the term is recognized. Long before, the Supreme Court experienced success in making breakthroughs since two years ago for civil cases, religious civil matters, military administration and state administration using technology for trials. For justice seekers with this type of case, the courthouse is not the only one to go to, but can also access an electronic judicial application or e-Court. Even more recently, the Supreme Court has added a feature for appeals. Following the breakthrough in the administrative field, the Supreme Court a year later launched the first e-Litigation applied to the general courts, religion, and state administration. [5] The use of technology is increasingly urgent to be used in courts [6], especially in criminal cases whose implementation cannot be postponed until the pandemic is pandemic. Therefore, an effective and efficient court trial is necessary through an online trial or an electronic trial.
Solus Populi Suprema Lex Esto, which means people's safety is the highest law (Cicero), this adage is very appropriate if it is linked as the basis for taking a policy during the Covid-19 outbreak because the law that will be applied must truly protect its people. As a quick response to the Supreme Court in ensuring the protection of judicial apparatus, justice seekers, and court users including defendants who conflict with the law, the Supreme Court has issued a Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 1 of 2020

METHODOLOGY/ MATERIALS
This study uses an empirical juridical method called field research, which is to examine the applicable legal provisions and what happens in reality in society. [10] Empirical juridical research is legal research regarding the enforcement or implementation of normative legal provisions in action on every particular legal event that occurs in society. [11] Or in other words, that is research conducted on the actual situation or real conditions that occur in the community intending to know and find the facts and data needed, after the data needed is collected then leads to problem identification which ultimately leads to problem-solving. [12] In this study, the approach used in solving the problem is by using an empirical juridical approach. The juridical approach that is meant is that law is seen as a norm or wich is expected because in discussing the problem in this study, legal materials are used (both written law and unwritten law or both primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. [13] While the empirical approach is to look at the law as a social, cultural, or reality because in this research the data used are primary data obtained directly from the research location.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The electronic trial has not been regulated in various regulations regarding procedural law, including Law no. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Civil Procedure Code. This is understandable because the technology used at that time was not as advanced as it is today. However, the trial arrangements for electronic devices had been regulated before the Covid-19 pandemic, namely with the issuance 3. More cost-effective An online trial that does not require an advocate to appear in court has a very good impact or benefit because it saves more costs. If during an offline trial, an advocate must incur significant costs during the trial because of several expenses, including transportation, accommodation, and consumption using an online trial, these costs can be reduced significantly, especially if the trial is outside the city.

Disadvantages of Online Sessions during the Covid-19 pandemic
Although the trial was conducted online, this was not matched by adequate electronic devices, so the proceedings did not run according to the provisions.  The online trial process during the Covid-19 pandemic gave rise to several significant problems in the context of law enforcement in Indonesia. Apart from various problems, at least there are several advantages of Online Court hearings during the Covid-19 pandemic, including: More practical and easier for the trial because it does not have to be present in court, is more efficient because case information is in one account, and is more cost-effective. In addition to the advantages, online trials also have several disadvantages, including signal interference and technological devices, lack of effectiveness in law enforcement, and violating the provisions of procedural law in the evidentiary process.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
The use of teleconference in examining cases in court is only as a means to obtain the truth of a problem, even though there is no regulation in the procedural law, but to achieve the truth as desired by law, it can be justified if in a trial the judge proves by using a teleconference facility so that the principle of justice fast, simple and low cost can be realized. Although the principle is a strong foundation in the formation of laws relating to procedural law, if it is no longer following the values that grow and develop in society, it is only natural that this principle has deviated, so that a sense of justice in society can be fulfilled.
So far, the law has always been far behind in the development of community needs, so progressive law is more open and responsive to changes and is not bound by written law. In this case, the law must be placed in the whole of humanity. Thus, the role of judges is more to ensure the fulfillment of community needs for justice and welfare. It means the existence of the law should reflect the standard of what is good and bad, fair and unfair.