{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03522205206738132, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.589743589743589, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Eliot, Milosz, and the Enduring Modernist Protest

That anyone might consider him a "modernist," and compare him to T. S. Eliot besides, probably would cause the Polish emigre writer Czeslaw Milosz to puzzle over definitions. But the term modernism itself has been a puzzle, and the movement, if we can agree to call it even that,' has seen stranger bedfellows. Yet in several essential ways, the two Nobel laureates may be seen as modernist protest poets. By "modernism" I mean the movement in twentieth-century literature that T. S. Eliot has come to exemplify. This seemingly circular definition will call to mind such studies as Michael Levenson's A