{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023743016759776536, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006983240223463687, 'mean_word_length': 5.181034482758621, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Conrad for the Magazines

It is Professor Graver's contention that there are two conflicting desires present in Conrad's literary works to write well, in tune with his inclinations, and to be able to sell his output as favorably as possible. Graver considers that writing novels was his real ambition, and that the stories were often quite deliberate potboilers. But he quotes with approval opinions that Conrad could never sustain consistently high quality in his longer pieces of fiction, and believes that his true achievement lies in the "longshort" story, as Ford Maddox Ford called it. He refrains, therefore, from discussing Conrad's longer fiction and examines carefully the thirty stories under 50,000words.