{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0212624584717608, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3277310924369745, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Human rights in the world of the genetic revolution.

The Biotechnological Revolution provides enormous possibilities to human development (nutrition, medicine, industry), while at the same time, creates social-ethical apprehensions due to the dangers to Human Rights that an improper use could generate. In this respect, Human Rights are presented as the "religion" of our time: accepted by all, although not equally practised. These rights, classified in the Universal Declaration of the United Nations, are the terms which society uses to ponder the ethical peformance of individuals and organizations. Harmonisation between Biotechnology and Human Rights should be based on a continuous social debate in which the principles that contribute to the respect of the human's essential nature should arise. As a starting point, considerations concerning the repercussions which the different genetic techniques have on each of the individually considered Human Rights, i.e. on dignity, equality, freedom, the right to health, to intimacy or to a worthy environment should be developed. Moreover, an international vision of the problem should be imposed since it should be remembered that initiatives that avoid attacks on Human Rights are either taken internationally or are condemned to failure. The following work was not written to give practical solutions to ethical conflicts but simply to consider some of the aspects which can create controversy in the search for a coherent future for human nature.