{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02796420581655481, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013422818791946308, 'mean_word_length': 5.215277777777778, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
EMPATHY: MIRROR NEURONS, PAULINE THEOLOGY, AND THE MEANING OF CARE

Many definitions of empathy exist. Some are very narrow, referring only to the ability to experience and relate with the feelings of another person. This narrow definition opens the way for negative uses of empathy, as say a Nazi soldier might use his recognition of a prisoner's fear to coerce the prisoner into compliance (Lambert, 2006). When defining empathy, most researchers include some elements that broaden the definition of empathy to include perspective taking, as well as the recognition of and response to affects (Decety & Jackson, 2004). Hodges and Klein (2001) note that perspective taking and affective response in empathy allow people to "coordinate their behavior and prevent misunderstandings that lead to inefficiency and strife." This last statement implies that empathy is related to positive responses.