{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023605150214592276, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.144736842105263, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
THE ORGANIZATION OF ORTHOGRAPHY

Words are displayed on unified trees which may be spoken, heard, read, or written, depending upon the intention of the language knower-user. Despite the widespread view that English orthography is grossly ambiguous, we show that ambiguity bears an inverse relation to context the more the context, the less the ambiguity. In particular, we permit the context of lexical semantics to bind the relations between phonemes and graphemes.