{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04743339831059129, 'fraction_numerical': 0.050032488628979854, 'mean_word_length': 5.062992125984252, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Diagnostic Value of Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity

VOLKMANN, H., ET AL.: Diagnostic Value of Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity. In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) we have investigated 163 asymptomatic patients (88 male, 75 female, mean age 57.9 ± 22.7 years) and 210 symptomatic patients (108 males, 102 females, mean age 61.1 ± 28.1 years) with syncopes or dizziness. Thirty two of the 163 asymptomatic patients (20%) and 87 of the 210 symptomatic patients (41%) showed CSH (asystole ≥ 3 sec during carotid sinus pressure). Male patients had a higher number of CSH than female (28% vs 10% in the asymptomatic group, 48% vs 34% in the symptomatic group). Electrophysiological investigations were performed in all 210 symptomatic patients. Normal electrophysiological results had 94 of the 210 patients. Thirty seven of these 94 patients showed CSH (39%). Prolonged sinus node recovery time (SNRT) and/or prolonged sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) were evaluated in 38 patients. Seventeen of the 38 patients had CSH (45%]. Disorders of atrioventricular (AV) conduction were evaluated in 43 patients. Seventeen of the 43 patients showed CSH (40%). Thirty‐five patients had both AV conduction disorders and prolonged SNRT or SACT. Sixteen of these 35 patients showed CSH (46%). In conclusion, no significant difference was found between patients with and without pathological electrophysiological results. The CSH is without value for predicting sinus node dysfunction and AV conduction disorder.