{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034526854219948847, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011508951406649617, 'mean_word_length': 4.757352941176471, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Data Power: Radical Geographies of Control and Resistance

Critical cartography has not only come a long way since J. B. Harley “deconstructed” the map in the late 1980s, but also since Jeremy Crampton and John Krygier offered their own account of the “one-two punch” of critical mapping practice and theoretical critique in the mid-2000s. Faced with the demise of capital C cartography, and also arguably of geographic information systems (GIS), those working in a critical cartographic vein have had to seek alternative paths to offering spirited critiques of spatial technologies. In Data Power: Radical Geographies of Control and Resistance, Jim E. Thatcher and Craig M. Dalton find a way, through a critique of the “role of data and technologies in culture and society” (p. 3).