{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020689655172413793, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011034482758620689, 'mean_word_length': 5.164305949008498, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Stratigraphic control on extensional fault propagation folding: Big Brushy Canyon monocline, Sierra Del Carmen, Texas

Abstract Mechanical stratigraphy exerts a first-order control on deformation at a range of scales from oilfield-scale structural style to deformation (e.g. fracturing) within an individual reservoir stratum. This paper explores an outcrop example where mechanical stratigraphy in a limestone and shale sequence directly influenced the structural style and distribution of deformation related to the propagation of a ‘seismic-scale’ normal fault that has maximum displacement on the order of 100–500 m and extends for more than 10 km. A monocline developed in Cretaceous Buda Limestone above tectonically thinned Del Rio Clay and faulted Santa Elena Limestone is here interpreted as an extensional fault propagation fold. Monocline limb dips reach 59°. The Del Rio Clay is thinned from approximately 36 m to 1.5 m, whereas the underlying Santa Elena Limestone is offset vertically by approximately 74 m along a steep (approximately 80°) normal fault. This large fault displacement of the Santa Elena Limestone is not transferred upward to the Buda Limestone because of ductile flow within the intervening Del Rio Clay. Although upward fault propagation has been inhibited, thinning of the Del Rio Clay and the resultant extreme displacement gradient at the tip of the fault have forced the Buda Limestone into a monoclinal fold. Two competent packstone and grainstone beds, 6 m and 2.7 m thick and separated by 10.5 m of less competent calcareous shale, comprise the Buda Limestone at this location. Deformation features within the competent Buda beds include bed-perpendicular veins that accommodate bed-parallel extension, and bedding plane slip surfaces with an up-dip sense of shear that offset the veins. Deformation is concentrated in the monoclinal limb and not in the monoclinal hinge regions. Consequently, bed-parallel extension and shear strain are associated with monoclinal dip, not with curvature. These results show that for this structure, bed dip is a better proxy for bed-parallel extension and related fracture dilation than is curvature.