{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04310344827586207, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.663934426229508, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ethics and Values in Decision-Making A Philosophical Critique of Faith-Based Policy

Abstract “Faith-based” policy would camouflage unconstitutional support for religion. Only some people want religion, but everyone wants faith. Humans, innately resisting uncertainty, would control life. Some humans would control their afterdcath, inspired by clergy, who invented souls and eternal hell. With believers' faith, belief would circumvent unknown truth. Yet, nonbelievers choose faith in reality, even the ancient unknowns: humankind's origin, purpose, and destiny and whether a creator controls. Science, with its unending respect for truth, may answer the unknowns, but religion, mired in dogma, diminishes with each discovery. Therefore, just governance doesn't enipower religion; faith-based policy is corrupt.