{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008658008658008658, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.860759493670886, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Generating intentions through argumentation

In this paper we consider how a BDI agent might determine its best course of action. We draw on previous work which has presented a model of persuasion over action and we discuss a formalism based upon this model which extends the BDI agent architecture to include the notion of value functions. This formalism will allow BDI agents to reason and argue about practical action, in accordance with our underlying model.