{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01904761904761905, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008571428571428572, 'mean_word_length': 5.527950310559007, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Memory retention capacity using two different training methods, appetitive and aversive learning, in juvenile red sea bream Chrysophrys major.

Memory retention based on appetitive and aversive learning was studied in juvenile red sea bream Chrysophrys major. The fish were individually trained via appetitive and aversive learning. In general, they retained appetitive memories for 30 days, but not for 60 days. Conversely, aversive memory endured for 1 day, but not for 3 days or longer. Analyses at the individual level revealed that some fish retained appetitive memories for 60 days, whereas others lost it within 3 days; this suggests considerable variability in memory retention capacity among individual fish. The memory duration for aversive learning was remarkably short, which should be considered when releasing trained fish into the wild for stock enhancement. Furthermore, the high inter-individual variability suggests that evaluating memory retention capacity through group experiments might lead to overestimation of fishes' ability.