{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02181208053691275, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008389261744966443, 'mean_word_length': 5.345744680851064, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Indications and results of breast implant replacement with implants pre-filled with silicone gel].

Based on a series of 74 patients, the authors report their experience of reoperation on unsatisfactory breast implants by the implant replacement technique using silicone prefilled implants. In 92 (57.8%) of the 160 cases, the implant was modified because of a peri-implant capsule, with a satisfactory aesthetic result after only a single operation. However, this leaves the problem of repeated surgical operations, especially in the context of Baker stage IV capsules, which are only partially improved after two to three surgical operations. A particular surgical revision technique is required in the cases, while the role of in situ cortivazol is under investigation. This series comprises two patients with auto-immune disease and dysimmune profiles, not exarcerbate by secondary surgery. Analysis of this series clearly argues in favour of reoperation for unsatisfactory breasts implants. Squeezing manoeuvres appear to be dangerous and useless. Textured implants filled with very cohesive silicone gel should be maintened in view of the absence of any reported serious complications.