{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024752475247524754, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.526881720430108, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Complex Problem Solving Discussion and its Performance Indicators

A complex problem has no clear definition of goals or solutions. Many social challenges fall within the range of complex problems. This research aims to formulate cognition-oriented guidelines for conducting productive CPS discussions. In our previous work, we developed a method to extract the cognitive process of complex problem-solving discussions. In this study, we proposed two indicators, “source-outcome retrieval ratio” and “change in the count of overlapped solution utterances” for the performance evaluation of CPS discussions.