{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01567398119122257, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007836990595611285, 'mean_word_length': 5.139423076923077, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Endoscopy databases: the Norwegian experience.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS
The implementation of endoscopy databases in Norway has been slow, and no commercial system has been successfully introduced.


MATERIAL AND METHODS
To determine the current status in this area a questionnaire survey was conducted with replies received from 58 of the 67 hospitals to which the questionnaire was sent.


RESULTS
Only 40% of the units had one or more personal computers available, but video endoscopes will soon be standard equipment at most Norwegian hospitals. For managing administrative data, a large majority of endoscopy units used a general-purpose hospital information system, but endoscopy data are dealt with manually in 72% of the units. The endoscopy report itself was produced manually in 93% of the units. When asked to rank various features of database systems according to their relative importance, the endoscopists stated that ease of use and simplification of routine chores were the most important aspects, while advanced storage and research features were less crucial.


CONCLUSION
In Norwegian hospitals, the use of minimal endoscopic database systems that offer a high level of integration with existing hospital systems appears to be the most promising approach.