{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05046728971962617, 'fraction_numerical': 0.052336448598130844, 'mean_word_length': 4.702127659574468, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Two relative clauses in Críth Gablach

The diplomatic reading of the first clause is ni dlighterfothus a thighe do neoch. The ambivalent semantics of dligid and the manuscript reading fothus have given rise to other suggested translations: 'No person is entitled to the hospitality of his house' (O'Curry 1873: 478); 'Refections at his house are not due to any person' (Ancient Laws of Ireland 1879: 303); 'No one is entitled to invite to his house' (MacNeill 1923: 286), and 'No one is allowed to set up his house' (McCone 1990: 204).