{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018894331700489854, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0013995801259622112, 'mean_word_length': 5.355555555555555, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of self-instruction methods for teaching diagnostic testing.

In a randomized controlled trial, self-teaching booklets and computer media were evaluated for teaching diagnostic testing to dental students as a foundation for further development of clinical decision making skills. Effectiveness was assessed by pre- and post-tests. Reliability of these test instruments was examined by analyzing the pre- and post-test scores of 49 first year dental students who received no instruction. Forty-one second year dental students were exposed to clinical epidemiological principles applied to endodontic diagnosis through either self-teaching booklets or computer media. No statistically significant difference was found between the mean test scores of the students through self-teaching booklets and computer media. Although first and second year students showed a statistically significant improvement between the pre-test and post-test, the improvement in the second year class was greater. An addendum was later made to the main trial to compare the self-teaching booklet to the traditional lecture format in teaching endodontic diagnosis. Seventy-one third year dental students were exposed to these same materials through either a lecture or the self-teaching booklet and then similarly tested. There was no significant difference between the self-teaching booklet and traditional lecture for the third year students.