{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01567398119122257, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001567398119122257, 'mean_word_length': 5.321782178217822, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Diagnosis and conservative treatment of tubercular rectoprostatic fistula.

OBJECTIVE
To present our experience with three cases of rectoprostatic fistula with special emphasis on diagnosis and conservative management.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
Three middle-aged men presented to us differently. All had spontaneous rectoprostatic fistulas. Biopsy showed tuberculosis though three consecutive urine samples for acid-fast bacilli were negative. None of the patients were immunocompromised. Their upper tracts were normal and all had a past history of pulmonary tuberculosis. They were started on antitubercular drugs and urinary diversion with or without faecal diversion.


RESULTS
All fistulae healed completely within 6 weeks of starting antitubercular treatment. One patient healed with bladder neck stenosis that required bladder neck incision. Voiding was normal on 1-year follow-up.


CONCLUSION
Spontaneous tubercular rectoprostatic fistulae are rare. There should be a strong clinical suspicion in endemic areas. Prostatic biopsy proves the diagnosis. Conservative management with antitubercular drugs and urinary diversion with or without faecal diversion has a high success rate and should be the first line of treatment even if urine is negative for acid-fast bacilli.