{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025222551928783383, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005934718100890208, 'mean_word_length': 4.9734513274336285, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Familial Privacy Right Over Death Images: Critiquing the Internet-Propelled Emergence of a Nascent Constitutional Right that Preserves Happy Memories and Emotions

In May 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit broke new constitutional ground in Marsh v. County of San Diego when it became the first court at any level to hold that a federal right to privacy, rooted in the word “liberty” within the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, encompasses “the power to control images of a dead family member.” Writing for a unanimous three-judge panel, Alex Kozinski, the Ninth Circuit’s iconoclastic chief judge, concluded that a mother “has a