{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03527902501603592, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013470173187940988, 'mean_word_length': 5.419753086419753, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Managing Methane Emissions in Abandoned Coal Mines: Comparison of Different Recovery Technologies by Integrating Techno-Economic Analysis and Life-Cycle Assessment.

Methane emissions from worldwide increasing abandoned coal mines have posed multiple challenges of global warming, energy waste, and explosion risk. This study first profiles the dynamic patterns of coal mine methane emissions in different recovery technologies, methane extraction with drainage (MEWD, mine-water concurrently extracted and treated) and direct methane extraction (DME, noncontrol on mine-water), in two abandoned mines from Ningxia and Inner Mongolia as China's leading coal provinces. Then, we conducted a techno-economic analysis and life-cycle assessment to quantify their comprehensive benefits. The key findings are as follows: (1) MEWD can long recover methane, although the economic profits decrease with declining methane extraction volume. DME can only work for ∼5 years, after which the mine is flooded, where methane is sealed underground and not recoverable. (2) MEWD drains and further treats the mine-water with an additional 29.4-35.9 million CNY cost compared with DME, while MEWD can achieve greater life-cycle environmental benefits with more cumulative methane recovery, whose CO2-eq (GWP-100) and SO2 reductions are 64.4 and 53.4% higher than those of DME. (3) MEWD is more promising for large-scale implementation, where feed-in tariffs and carbon market measures can improve the economics for sustainable management of incremental abandoned mine methane.