{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02562642369020501, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03132118451025057, 'mean_word_length': 4.996587030716723, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Trend in the use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for the management of muscle invasive bladder cancer at a major tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.

e16033 Background: Although the use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) has now become the standard of care for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) in the world, most patients in lower- middle-income countries (LMIC), like Pakistan, are still undergoing upfront surgery despite being ideal candidates for chemotherapy. Multi-disciplinary tumor boards have been critical in the change of this trend in the developed world. We aimed to assess the trends in the use of NAC for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer before undergoing definitive surgery. Methods: We included patients who underwent surgery for ≥ cT2 MIBC without distant metastasis between 2011 and 2015 at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. We retrospectively assessed the trends in NAC compared to upfront surgery in these patients. Results: Among the 171 patients included in our study, only 4 (2.34%) received NAC, whereas the other 167 (97.67%) underwent upfront surgery without NAC. Out of the 90 patients who underwent surgery for MIBC between 2011 and 2013, none of them received NAC and underwent upfront surgery. Among the 81 patients with MIBC in 2014 and 2015, 4 patients received NAC before surgery whereas the other 77 underwent upfront surgery. Conclusions: The adoption of NAC for MIBC remains a challenge in lower- middle-income countries such as Pakistan. Introduction of a multidisciplinary tumor board in our hospital since 2014 has shown a slight change in this trend. Better communication between different departments remains the key in significantly changing the trend of a much desired standard of care.