{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023174157303370788, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0007022471910112359, 'mean_word_length': 5.753554502369668, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
High-Performance Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Biological and Materials Sciences: Challenges of Performance Portability

Highly-optimized parallel molecular dynamics programs have allowed researchers to achieve ground-breaking results in biological and materials sciences. This type of performance has come at the expense of portability: a significant effort is required for performance optimization on each new architecture. Using a metric that emphasizes speedup, we assess key accelerating programming components of four different best-performing molecular dynamics programs-- GROMACS, NAMD, LAMMPS and CP2K-- each having a particular scope of application, for contribution to performance and for portability. We use builds with and without these components, tested on HPC systems. We also analyze the code-bases to determine compliance with portability recommendations. We find that for all four programs, the contributions of the non-portable components to speed are essential to the programs' performances; without them we see a reduction in time-to-solution of a magnitude that is insufferable to domain scientists. This characterizes the performance efficiency that must be approached for good performance portability on a programmatic level, suggesting solutions to this difficult problem, which should come from developers, industry and funding institutions, and possibly new research in programming languages.