{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0273224043715847, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00156128024980484, 'mean_word_length': 5.251219512195122, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Music and Revolution: Cultural Change in Socialist Cuba by Robin D. Moore

Are Not Enough’’ specifically addresses the gendered content of Afrocentrism. Hill Collins provides an important critique of both the strengths and limitations of nationalist politics that can promote self determination and reliance while continuing to ignore gender and other inequalities. The third section: ‘‘Feminism, Nationalism, and African-American Women,’’ encompasses chapter five (‘‘Why Collective Identity Politics Matter’’) and chapter six (‘‘Is the Personal Still Political?’’). The arguments in these two chapters are important because they highlight both the advances and restrictions that Black women have faced in relation to constructs of Black nationalism and the predominate program of liberal feminism. While the points within these latter two chapters are significant and may be new to many of the readers of a book directly marketed to the ‘‘hip hop generation,’’ they have been made before and are presented in overly broad form. For instance, the point that Black women’s everyday lives have been unfairly ignored by years of white-dominated feminism is not a new supposition. To someone encountering these ideas for the first time, the text may be incredibly important, but to a reader well versed in the writings of Hill Collins and=or critical race theory and womanist scholarship, the reading will be repetitive. If Hill Collins’ goal was to promote the advancement of intersectional theorizing and a solidarity between feminist and antiracist politics, then it was accomplished more in this text by her early chapters than those that come later. Still the book can serve as a good primer for those uninitiated with her writings, but they might want to read it backwards. If not, those in search of an introduction to her ideas should pick up Black Feminist Thought (Unwin Hyman, 1990). Despite the inversion of complexity in the work, Hill Collins’ writing is always composed with a synthesis of historical analyses, popular culture, literature, and theory that is often lacking in other academics’ social scientific treatises. Any of the six essays within the text makes a clear case that either an organized-collective or individual response to racism, sexism, or capitalism must incorporate an intersectional approach. As a consequence, the reader is left with the insistence that both the changed consciousness of individuals and the social transformation of political and economic institutions require simultaneous attention to race, class, and gender.