{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030350194552529183, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0038910505836575876, 'mean_word_length': 5.840425531914893, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Understanding diastolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: choosing the right model.

Congestive heart failure (HF) is a frequent reason for hospital admission. Fifty percent of HF hospitalizations have normal ejection fraction (EF), 1 referred to as diastolic HF (DHF). In contrast, patients with systolic HF (SHF) have reduced EF. The DHF phenotype describes patients with signs and symptoms of HF, normal EF, normal left ventricular (LV) volume, hypertension with increased relative wall thickness, LV diastolic dysfunction, and predominantly elderly women. 1,2 Etiology of DHF Longstanding hypertension may result in significant myocardial hypertrophy, appearance of a smaller ventricular chamber, increased ventricular stiffness, and delayed relaxation. Increased ventricular stiffness requires increased pressure to maintain normal filling in the presence of normal or reduced chamber volume.3 Although DHF has not been studied as extensively as SHF, limited data obtained from patients hospitalized for DHF suggest that demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and pathology differ from those with SHF. Despite these differences, DHF is similar to SHF with regard to volume overload, reduced exercise capacity, impaired quality of life, and long-term mortality.1