{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04076637009838535, 'fraction_numerical': 0.030009885609377205, 'mean_word_length': 5.071306087453558, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 5, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 3, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Classical and Next-Generation Vaccine Platforms to SARS-CoV-2: Biotechnological Strategies and Genomic Variants

Several coronaviruses (CoVs) have been identified as human pathogens, including the α-CoVs strains HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63 and the β-CoVs strains HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-OC43. SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 are also classified as β-coronavirus. New SARS-CoV-2 spike genomic variants are responsible for human-to-human and interspecies transmissibility, consequences of adaptations of strains from animals to humans. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 binds to receptor ACE2 in humans and animal species with high affinity, suggesting there have been adaptive genomic variants. New genomic variants including the incorporation, replacement, or deletion of the amino acids at a variety of positions in the S protein have been documented and are associated with the emergence of new strains adapted to different hosts. Interactions between mutated residues and RBD have been demonstrated by structural modelling of variants including D614G, B.1.1.7, B1.351, P.1, P2; other genomic variants allow escape from antibodies generated by vaccines. Epidemiological and molecular tools are being used for real-time tracking of pathogen evolution and particularly new SARS-CoV-2 variants. COVID-19 vaccines obtained from classical and next-generation vaccine production platforms have entered clinicals trials. Biotechnology strategies of the first generation (attenuated and inactivated virus–CoronaVac, CoVaxin; BBIBP-CorV), second generation (replicating-incompetent vector vaccines–ChAdOx-1; Ad5-nCoV; Sputnik V; JNJ-78436735 vaccine-replicating-competent vector, protein subunits, virus-like particles–NVX-CoV2373 vaccine), and third generation (nucleic-acid vaccines–INO-4800 (DNA); mRNA-1273 and BNT 162b (RNA vaccines) have been used. Additionally, dendritic cells (LV-SMENP-DC) and artificial antigen-presenting (aAPC) cells modified with lentiviral vector have also been developed to inhibit viral activity. Recombinant vaccines against COVID-19 are continuously being applied, and new clinical trials have been tested by interchangeability studies of viral vaccines developed by classical and next-generation platforms.

Bats are reservoirs for a wide variety of coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) viruses. SARS-CoV emerged in 2003 from recombination between bat (genus Phinolopus) coronaviruses and started to circulate in intermediate hosts, notably civets (Paguna larvata), a common carnivore in Asia. Figure 1. Electron micrograph of a coronavirus particle obtained by negative staining of a clarified suspension of a human fecal sample (Source: Monika Barth/IOC) [3]. Figure 1. Electron micrograph of a coronavirus particle obtained by negative staining of a clarified suspension of a human fecal sample (Source: Monika Barth/IOC) [3].
Ecological and environmental factors facilitate the emergence of new pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2, and their spread to several animals' species able to be reservoirs (natural and intermediate hosts) of infectious diseases. The interactions between humans, animals, and environment across large-scale geographic barriers induce zoonotic spillover events causing ecological and socioeconomic impacts in the one health approach. Biological invasions by emergent zoonotic viruses across geographic barriers through interfaces between reservoir hosts, intermediate hosts, and humans have been described in susceptible populations [6,7]. The origin of SARS-CoV-2 involved zoonotic transfer, independent of whether the source of transmission was an animal host such as Malayan pangolins (Manis javanica) or previous natural selection in humans or laboratory escapes of SARS-CoV during cell culture passage or from animal models [1].
SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV2 genome sequences show that they are phylogenetically close. The current outbreak of acute respiratory disease associated with SARS-CoV-2 started in Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly throughout the world. However, the virus has been detected in sewage samples in southern Brazil (November 2019), demonstrating that the virus was circulating more than two month before public health notifications [8].

Cellular and Humoral Immunity
Transcriptome analysis has confirmed that NK cell counts are decreased in the peripheral blood of patients with severe COVID-19. CXCR3 and CXCL9-11 ligands are increased by SARS-CoV-2 in lung tissue in vitro, and SARS-CoV-2 mediates the recruitment of peripheral blood NK cell infiltration into the lungs in infected patients [9]. Immunological memory is still an area with many questions to be elucidated. Until now, previous studies suggested that T cells may confer long-term immunity after, identifying that virus-specific T cells persisted for at least 6-11 years. Virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells detected in infected patients were characterized by CD45RA and CCR7 expression as CD4 Tcm (central memory) or CD8 Tem (effector memory). Virus-specific T cell responses as the production of specific inflammatory cytokines by CD4 T cells correlated with Th2 cell (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10) serum cytokines are increased in cases of severe disease [9]. The humoral immune response, unlike cellular immunity, can be transmitted by plasma or serum such as the production of hyperimmune globulins in immunize horses with recombinant trimeric spike (S) glycoprotein against SARS-CoV-2. Plasma from immunized animals showed titers 150-fold higher than the neutralizing titers in human convalescent plasma as a new therapeutical against COVID-19 [10]. The weakened immune system promotes the proliferation of opportunistic invading pathogens such as the virus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a human gamma herpesvirus. EBV reactivation induced by COVID-19 inflammation may occur soon after or concurrently with long COVID-19 infection [11].
Another study about diabetic individuals with severe lung lesions analyzed monocyte metabolism that modulates T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 and identified several glycolysisassociated genes upregulated in monocytes [12]. The virus replicates in vitro more at high concentrations of glucose in monocytes infected. Consequently, high glucose levels in diabetic patients captured by monocytes favor massive virus replication and the release of large amounts of cytokines. The cytokine storm, including the interleukins IL-6 and IL-1 β, and tumor necrosis factor α, generates an uncontrolled inflammatory response leading to systemic changes directly affecting lung cells [12].
Patients severely ill with COVID-19 have been found to display overexpression of genes involved in the INF-α and INF-β signaling pathway, which is linked to the antiviral response [12]. In Vero cell culture, both IFN-a and IFN-β reduce the viral load, and IFN-β showed greater potential for action against the virus. IFN-α decreased the viral titer by 3.4 log of IFN-β by above 4 log, and treatment with both cytokines prevented cytopathic effects on Vero cells [13].

Phylogeny and Viral Genomics
SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped positive-sense, single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) coronavirus, presenting as spherical particles of 100-160 nm in diameter with a genome of 27-32 kb. The 5 -terminal two-thirds of the RNA genome is polycistronic and encodes a polyprotein, pp1ab, mainly in open reading frame 1 (ORF-1). This protein is cleaved into 16 non-structural proteins (NSPs1-NSPs16). The 3 terminus one-third of the SARS-CoV-2 genome is partly monocistronic and encodes four essential structural proteins, called spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N) [2]. S-glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 can bind to host cell receptors for virus entry by angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the surface of human cells. S glycoprotein includes two subunits, S1 and S2. S1 determines the virus-host range and cellular tropism by RBD domain, while S2 mediates virus-cell membrane fusion by two tandem domains, heptad repeats 1 (HR1) and heptad repeats 2 (HR2). M protein is responsible for the transmembrane transport of nutrients, the bud release, and the formation of viral envelope. Both nucleocapsid and envelope protein interfere with host immune response [2]. The three-dimensional structure of the S protein has been determined by computer modelling and cryoelectronic microscopy techniques [14]. Molecular dynamic simulations and computer docking analyses have been used to develop drugs based on the SARS-CoV-2 structure. Physical equations are used to predict interactions between therapeutic targets and potential drugs to identify agents that can subsequently be tested for inhibition of viral infectivity in cell culture and animal models [15]. Since the beginning of the pandemic, 4000 genomic variants have been observed. However, 80% of the genomic variants are synonymous (no change in the amino acid encoded). Non-synonymous genomic variants where amino acid substitution or deletion occurs, are more significant. The first genomic variants in the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein were registered in January 2020 in China: D614G (aspartate (D) at amino acid position 614 replaced by glycine (G). About 20% of Brazilian isolates in May 2020 had this D614G. All Brazilian isolates in February 2021 presented the D614G mutation [16].
In October 2020, a new variant (N501Y) called B.1.1.7 was detected in the UK [1]. In December of the same year, a new variant called B.1.351 was detected in South Africa (501Y.V2) [16]. Both variants (501Y.V2 and 501Y) carried another mutation: E484K. K417N/E484K/N501Y variants have since been isolated in Japan, the USA, France, and Since the beginning of the pandemic, 4000 genomic variants have been observed. However, 80% of the genomic variants are synonymous (no change in the amino acid encoded). Non-synonymous genomic variants where amino acid substitution or deletion occurs, are more significant. The first genomic variants in the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein were registered in January 2020 in China: D614G (aspartate (D) at amino acid position 614 replaced by glycine (G). About 20% of Brazilian isolates in May 2020 had this D614G. All Brazilian isolates in February 2021 presented the D614G mutation [16].
In October 2020, a new variant (N501Y) called B.1.1.7 was detected in the UK [1]. In December of the same year, a new variant called B.1.351 was detected in South Africa (501Y.V2) [16]. Both variants (501Y.V2 and 501Y) carried another mutation: E484K. K417N/E484K/N501Y variants have since been isolated in Japan, the USA, France, and Italy. In December 2020, a new variant was found in Manaus, in Brazil, called (P1) B.1.1.28. In the following month, in January 2021 a new variant called P2 (E484K) was detected in Rio de Janeiro, but it is less aggressive than P1 [1].
One of the most variable parts of the SARS-CoV-2 genome is the encoding of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) in the spike protein. The RBD of SARS-CoV-2 binds specifically to the ACE2 receptor in humans and other host animal species [1]. Six RBD  amino acids have been shown to play a key role in binding to ACE2-Y442, L472, N479,  D480, T487, and Y4911, which corresponds to L455, F486, Q493, S494, N501, and Y505 in SARS-CoV-2 [1]. During viral replication, there can be changes in the genomic nucleotide sequence, and such errors are more common viruses with RNA than DNA genomes. These replication errors are a major source of genetic variability, and the genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 and in the gene encoding the spike protein may be in part the consequences ( Figure 2). PROVEAN software (Protein Variation Effect Analysis) has been used to analyze all known genomic variants (synonymous and non-synonymous) in SARS-CoV-2 proteins, and 536 mutated positions have been identified among the variants from Indian isolates where the proteins ORF1ab, spike (S), nucleocapsid (N), ORF3a, ORF7a, and ORF8 are most susceptible of genomic variants [18]. A major concern is the emergence of new variants resistant to available vaccines, particularly if associated with greater transmissibility and virulence.
Viral neutralization assays and analyses of plasma from convalescent individuals have demonstrated the persistence and resistance of new variants of SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, some proteins that could serve as targets of vaccines are conserved in SARS-CoV-2 variants. Additionally, the nucleocapsid (N) protein is conserved in all coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV). Cryo-EM structural investigations of the SARS-CoV-2 N protein (48 kDa) have revealed their interactions with human antibodies. However, the N proteins in other coronaviruses such as OC43, HKU1, NL63, and 229E show structural divergences [19].
Coronavirus variants can be classified into three categories: variants of interest (VOI), variants of concern (VOC), and variants of high sequence (VOHC) [20]. Despite the high rates of transmissibility and characteristics of genomic variants, until this moment, no SARS-CoV-2 variants have been designated as VOHC [20]. The strains from the United Kingdom (B.1.1.7), currently classified by World Health Organization (WHO) label as Alpha; from Brazil at Manaus city (P.1), classified as Gamma; from South Africa (B.1.351 or 501.V2), classified as Beta; and B.1.617.2 first identified from India and classified as Delta by WHO are variants of concern. The variants' VOI and VOC are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.   [16,21]. The strain is 70% more transmissible than other SARS-CoV-2 strains [21]. This increased infectivity is also associated with the molecular interactions between the mutant residue Y501 in the spike RDB and the residues Y41 and K353 of the host ACE2 receptor [22].

B.1.351
This variant was found in South Africa in October 2020 and is also called the 501Y.V2 [21]. B.1.1.351 has three genomic variants (K417N, E484K, and N501Y) in the RBD and is more transmissible than the parental strain; it shows an increased viral load and resistance to neutralization by antibodies generated either by natural infection or by vaccination. Structural modelling has been used to study interactions of mutation site residues and the antibody receptor-binding domain (RBD) [23]. B.1.351 is neutralized by convalescent plasma and serum from individuals vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine with an effectiveness similar to that of the parental strain. However, the Janssen single-dose COVID-19 vaccine and Oxford-AstraZeneca AZD1222 vaccine were less effective against this variant than against the control strain [23].

P1 and P2
The P.1 variant, also known as B.1.1.28, was identified in November 2020 in Manaus. It carries 17 unique amino acid changes, three deletions, and four synonymous genomic variants [24]. The E484K, K417T/N, and N501Y genomic variants are the most worrisome because they generate greater transmissibility by increasing viral contagion [25,26]. The P1 variant is highly resistant to previously developed antibodies, and it can reinfect individuals who have already had COVID-19. The P.1 variant was detected in a screening nasopharyngeal swab sample from an asymptomatic traveler from Brazil (GenBank accession no. MW517286) [26]. The P.2 lineage reported in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, only carries the E484K genomic variants [25].

B.1.617
Variant B.1.617, detected in India, has 13 genomic variants, including a "double mutant" in the spike protein (E484Q and L452R). It carries the common genomic variants D111D, G142D, D614G, and P681R in the spike protein, including the receptor-binding domain (RBD). There are three versions of this variant (B.1.617.1, B.1.617.2, and B.1.617.3), and it has been found in more than 51 countries. It received the classification of variant of interest, and it is now considered by the World Health Organization as a "variant of concern" due to its higher transmissibility. The enhanced transmissibility is in part due to increased ACE2 binding and rate of S1-S2 cleavage by RBD associated with genomic variants L452R with P681R in the furin cleavage site [26]. The most recent reported occurrences in different countries on the European continent (Table 3), Asian continent (Table 4), American continent (Table 5), Oceanian continent (Table 6), and African continent ( Table 7) Table 8 below (adapted https://www.gisaid.org/hcov19variants/, accessed 5 January 2022).

Diagnostics
Biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have developed oligonucleotides and tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2 directed at three target genes coding for the envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) protein. Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and new-generation sequencing platforms have been used as standard tools in viral diagnosis. qRT-PCR has

Diagnostics
Biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies have developed oligonucleotides and tests for detection of SARS-CoV-2 directed at three target genes coding for the envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) protein. Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and new-generation sequencing platforms have been used as standard tools in viral diagnosis. qRT-PCR has detected continued virus infection in patients 42 days post-infection. Transcriptome analyses involving RNA sequencing has shown that the counts of natural killer cells, which recognize the virus through cell receptors, are lower in the peripheral blood of patients with severe COVID-19 than that of controls. Viral neutralization assays with pseudo virus production have been tested using African green monkey kidney Vero cells, and SARS-CoV-2 viral stocks have been propagated in the same type of cell culture [12]. New tests for antibody binding to cell surface spike proteins of SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV have been detected by immunofluorescence microscopy and low cytometry assay based on the HEK-293 T cell line transfected with viral plasmids fused to green fluorescence protein (GFP) using lipofectamine [10]. Viral neutralization assays for SARS-CoV-2 by plaque reduction test (PRNT) techniques have been used to determine viral titers, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunofluorescence microscopy have been used to study antibodies.
The three proteins that are targets of the main diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are the envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) proteins. Several methods for detecting IgG and IgM antibodies and antigens of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have been developed for point-of-care tests, and they generally involve fluorescence and immunochromatography assays.
Many chimeric monoclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies have been developed based on the S protein RBD epitope, which was developed by ACRObiosystems (antibody S1N-M122) and was able to neutralize the variants identified in the United Kingdom (B.1.1.7), South Africa (B.1.351), Brazil (P.1), and California (B.1.429), and the wild-type variant carrying D614G (WT-D614G). This S1N-M122 antibody will be valuable for quality control for recombinant vaccines, as a positive control in screening for neutralizing antibodies, and for COVID-19-antigen testing assays.

Viral Biosynthesis
The high transmissibility and virulence SARS-CoV-2 are in part explained by the interactions between the spike protein and transmembrane serine protease 2 enzymes (TMPRSS2), cathepsins, and furin present in large quantities in human cells. These three enzymes act as genetic scissors, cutting and thereby activating the spike protein; this facilitates the fusion of the viral membrane into the cell membrane [28].
Coronaviruses are coated with a group of proteins known as spike proteins or glycoprotein S (150 KDa). Host transmembrane serine protease enzyme type II (TMPRSS2) activates S proteins homotrimers by interaction with residues 331 to 524 [29]. After activation, the S protein binds to the host cell angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2), which serves as the receptor allowing cell entry [2] and is then cleaved by the furin-like host cell protease into two subunits, S1 and S2. ACE-2 regulates vasoconstriction and vasodilation through the action of renin, angiotensin, and androsterone. ACE-2 is highly expressed in cells of the lower respiratory tract, cells of the gastrointestinal tract, stratified epithelial cells, enterocytes, cardiomyocytes, hepatocytes, and urinary cells [30].
There has been work to identify other host factors involved in cell entry. CD 47 may anchor the virus, promoting fusion of the virus and the cell membrane, release of the viral RNA, or formation of a complex containing the virus; this may favor endocytosis and consequently the release of viral RNA into the cytoplasm [30].
Most of the synthesized nonstructural proteins (nsps) form a replicase-transcriptase complex in double-membrane vesicles in the host cell, which are mainly an assembly by RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and helicase. Moreover negative-sense genes and positive-sense mRNAs are transcripted by a complex using the genome template of viral entry [29]. Subgenomic fragments are translated into structural and accessory proteins including M, S, and E, which are then anchored to the endoplasmic reticulum and progress to the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi intermediate compartment. Finally, replicated RNA is incorporated into this viral envelope, and new viruses sprout through the Golgi complex, where the nucleocapsids bind other structural proteins and form small vesicles; the vesicles export the new infectious viral particles by exocytosis [30].

Classical and Next-Generation Vaccine Platforms
Diverse approaches are being used for the development of vaccines against COVID-19: live attenuated virus, inactivated vaccines grown in cell culture, non-replicating viral vectors such as adenovirus in particular type 5 adenovirus (Ad5-nCoV) (CanSino Biologicals Company), expressing protein S carrying SARS-CoV-2 particles [31] or replicationincompetent vector vaccines, replicating or replicating-competent viral vector vaccines expressing the S protein, recombinant protein (recombinant spike protein-based and recombinant RBD-based vaccines), peptide-based, virus-like particle (VLP), nucleic-acid vaccines (use the electroporation of plasmid DNA that encodes the virus S protein and mRNA vaccines encapsulated in Lipid nanoparticles (LNP) that encodes the S protein for example Modern Company with mRNA technology-1273), and dendritic cells modified and artifi-cial antigen-presenting cells, both modified with lentiviral vector [31][32][33][34]. Technological platforms for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates licensed or under development are shown in Table 9. * Vaccine efficacy data can be different, as the protocols are not always the same, as well as the behavior of the population, which changes from country to country and even within the same country, depending on the situation of the pandemic. ** SARS-CoV-2 3C-like protease (3CLpro), NSP5, SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro). Sources [32,35].

Weakened and Inactivated Virus
Vaccines using live-attenuated virus based on by a weakened version of the flu virus adapted to COVID-19 virus have been developed by the University of Hong Kong (China) and can be administered by the intranasal route [32].

Inactivated Virus CoronaVac
SARS-CoV-2 virus was plaque-purified and cultivated in Vero cells in several passages. The virus was inactivated with b-propiolactone and added to aluminum adjuvant to give the CoronaVac vaccine (Sinovac Biotech, Beijing, China) [32]. This vaccine should be stored at 2 to 8 • C and administered in two doses with an interval of 14 days. CoronaVac shows 50% effectiveness against variant P.1. In the research in Brazil, the efficacy data showed that if the person is infected by the SARS-CoV-2, CoronaVac vaccine offers 100% effectiveness for not getting seriously ill, 78% for preventing mild cases, and 50.38% less risk of becoming ill. The immunizing agent also showed good results against the Delta variant of the coronavirus in the laboratory.

CoVaxin
CoVaxin vaccine (BBV152), produced by the Indian laboratory Bharat Biotech, is a whole-virion β-propiolactone-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine developed with a toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule, and it uses alum as adjuvant. The safety and immunogenicity of BBV152 were tested in several hospitals in India. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04471519). The vaccine (BBV152) must be injected intramuscularly (deltoid muscle) at a volume of 0.5 mL/dose in a two-dose regimen, respecting the interval of two weeks (14 days) between doses. The vaccine had an overall efficacy of 78% in symptomatic cases and 100% in severe cases. In addition, it can be kept at refrigerator temperature, between 2 to 8 • C. The contents of the bottle remain valid for use up to 28 days after opening, provided it is well-stored [36,37].

BBIBP-CorV
BBIBP-CorV vaccine, manufactured by Sinopharm and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)/Beijing Institute of Biological Products, is chemically inactivated whole virus vaccine with propriolactone and produced in Vero cells. It has no viral replication capacity but keeps its proteins intact and generates an immune response with 79% of the original strain. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2000031809; ChiCTR2000032459). Safety and tolerability profile in the two doses administered by the intramuscular route with a 21-day interval between applications was confirmed by study design [34].

Nucleic Acid Vaccines
INO-4800 is a plasmid DNA vaccine developed by Inovio Pharmaceuticals (Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA) for preclinical testing within the ferret model of COVID-19. This DNA vaccine encoding the S protein was delivered by electroporation [33]. INO-4800 was able to reduce viral load in non-human primates; rhesus macaque, used as model, that received two doses (1 mg) for 4 weeks of the DNA vaccine showed humoral and cellular immune responses after 13 weeks [38]. The vaccine s+howed effectiveness against both D614 and G614 SARS-CoV-2 variants [39]. The study of safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of INO-4800 for COVID-19 was tested in healthy volunteers using SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein as antigen.

RNA Vaccine mRNA-1273
A lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encapsulated mRNA vaccine was developed by Moderna (USA); the mRNA encodes the S-2P antigen glycoprotein, which is the S2 subunit with two consecutive substitutions of proline at amino acid positions 986 and 987 [32,33,40]. The mRNA-1273 vaccine induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in the first dose, and neutralizing antibodies increased after the second administration of the vaccine in all healthy volunteers in phase 1 clinical trials, irrespective of whether they received a dose of 25 µg, 100 µg, or 250 µg [40]. The vaccine was administered as a 0.5 mL injection by the intramuscular route, using saline solution as a diluent of the doses administered, with 100 µg dose concluded in the phase 3 trial [38]. The adult population (over 18 years) should get a booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (e.g., Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech) at least 5 months after the last dose of vaccine in the schedule [20].

BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 Vaccine
BNT162b1 is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated mRNA vaccine developed by BioNtech SE (Mainz, Germany)/Pfizer (New York, NY, USA) using SARS-CoV-2 proteases (3C-like pro and Mpro) as antigen. It was assessed in three age groups of healthy adults at three different doses (10 µg, 30 µg, or 100 µg) in a randomized study: safety and immunogenicity were demonstrated 14 days after the second administration [40]. After the first administration of the BNT162b2 vaccine in Israel, the efficacy in preventing COVID-19 was 52.4% [41] and 2 to 7 days after the second dose there was 90.5% effectiveness.
The immunogenicity and safety were designed in the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on a two-dose schedule in three age groups: ages 5 to 11 years (received two-dose schedule of 10 µg each); ages 2 to 5 years; and ages 6 months to 2 years. Both age groups under 5 years received a lower 3 µg dose for each injection in the phase 2/3 study [42,43]. For booster doses, children over 12 years should receive one at least 5 months after the last dose. Teenagers in age group between 12 to 17 years should get a booster dose of only the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. And adults over 18 can receive a booster dose of any mRNA COVID-19 vaccine [20].

Viral Vector Vaccines
Viral vector-based vaccines have been used in gene therapy and include replicating viral vectors and non-replicating viral vectors [32].

Replicating Viral Vectors and Non-Replicating Viral Vectors ChAdOx-1-AZD1222 Vaccine
The AZD1222 vaccine is a chimpanzee viral vector (ChAdOx1) developed at Oxford University and manufactured by AstraZeneca Biopharmaceutical. This vaccine derived from a replication-deficient simian adenovirus vector ChAdOx1 [32], carries sequences encoding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and a tissue plasminogen activator leader sequence [44]. Two doses of AZD1222 should be administered at an interval of 12 weeks between doses, and it must be stored at 2 to 8 • C for no more than six months.
Several viral vectors had been designed to develop vaccines against MERS-CoV using a cloning strategy based on ChAdOx1 with or without sequences encoding the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) signal peptide [44]. Analyses of humoral and cellular immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 in previous studies on MERS-CoV vaccine candidates demonstrated high responses against the MERS-CoV spike antigen [45]. Induction of virus-neutralizing antibodies was also demonstrated in serum from vaccinated mice [44].
A preliminary study in 2018 of the safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 MERS vaccine involved administering three different doses in humans by single intramuscular injection. Moderate and severe adverse events were significantly more frequent in the high-dose group (5 × 10 10 viral particles) than in the intermediate-dose group who received (2.5 × 10 10 viral particles), but the ChAdOx1 MERS was considered safe and well-tolerated [45]. These single doses elicited both humoral and cellular responses against MERS-CoV [46].
There were mild or moderate local and systemic adverse events similar to those caused by other ChAdOx1-vectored vaccines. Reactogenicity was reported in the first clinical trials of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, although it was well-tolerated and immunogenic [44].
The same chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAd) vector has also been successfully used for vaccines against other infections such as malaria, HIV, influenza, hepatitis C, tuberculosis, and Ebola. These vaccines show high immunogenicity and safety in humans [45].  [33]. Work with cohorts testing safety have led to Ad5-nCoV not being recommended for immunocompromised individuals [32].

Human Adenovirus Type 26 and 5-Sputnik V Vaccine
Sputnik V is based on two adenoviral vectors: AD 26 and AD5. It was developed by the Gamaleya National Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology (Russia). Sequences encoding the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 were inserted into each vector; the antigenic composition of AD 26 (first dose, 0.5 mL) is different from that of AD 5 (second dose, 0.5 mL) given 21 days later. This strategy circumvents the antigenicity problem. The vaccine should be stored at 2 to 8 • C for no more than six months and can be stored at −20 • C for two years [47]. The recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein produced in genetically engineered Sf9 insect cells has been used as a vaccine developed by Novavax (USA). A nanoparticle formulation with saponin-based Matrix-M1 adjuvant was incorporated into the modified protein of this NVX-CoV2373 vaccine [48]. Two doses of 5 µg of NVX-CoV2373 vaccine elicited strong immune responses as assessed by comparing antibody titers with those in convalescent serum from COVID-19 patients [48]. Vaccine administration consists of two doses at a 21-day interval. The ideal storage temperature is 2 to 8 • C for six months, and the vaccine can be stored at −20 • C for two years. It has an efficacy of around 86% against the British variant and 55% against the South African variant.

Pathogen-Specific aAPC
Similarly, artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPCs) modified with lentiviral vectors expressing synthetic minigenes encoding domains of selected viral proteins have also been developed by the Shenzhen Geno-Immune Medical Institute [33].

COVID-19 Therapy and the Antimicrobial Resistance
Several therapeutic antibodies such as monoclonal antibodies remdesivir, casirivimab, imdevimab, bamlanivimab, and etesevimab are being used to treat COVID-19 infection, inducing moderate or high efficacy against B. and has been administered by oral route as prevention and treatment of COVID-19 [49]. Paxlovid is the first antiviral drug that is a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir tablets, co-packaged for oral treatment of COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients (12 years of age) recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [50].
Both vaccines ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 use different technological platforms for vaccination booster prime-induced immunity. In particular, BNT162b2 induced high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 variants [51]. The heterologous prime/booster-inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac) and adenoviralvectored vaccine (AZD1222) tested for SARSCoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG induced higher levels of specific IgG than that of two-dose homologous CoronaVac or AZD1222 vaccines [52]. Aspects related to cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2, such as virusspecific T cell responses, humoral immunity in the production of neutralizing antibodies, and the natural killer cell transcriptome analysis are key tools for better understanding of immunity in the medium and long term, either by natural infection or by vaccination.
The excessive or inadequate use of antibiotics, antivirals, antifungals, and antiparasitics induces the appearance of microorganisms resistant to the action of drugs, and it can further depress the immune system, leaving it more vulnerable to the emergence of opportunistic infections, as well as to the re-emergence of latent infections such as herpesviruses, for example. The RNA genome of coronaviruses is highly genetically variable, and there is substantial gene recombination leading to frequent emergence of variants. Therefore, the use of antimicrobials in patients with COVID-19 increased the resistance to these drugs, exacerbated by the increased incidence of multi-resistant hospital pathogens and the development of very resistant strains. Consequently, COVID treatment guidelines had been published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the concern, and the recommendation was to mitigate the use inappropriate of antimicrobials because of the incorrect choice of drug, inadequate dosage, and route of administration [20].

Conclusions
The world is now going through the fourth wave of COVID-19, and it is unclear when or how this viral pandemic will end. Although various technological platforms have been adopted by different countries, the global strategy is to slow down the spread and reduce the incidence of the virus through mass vaccination. The benefits are evident and are reflected in the continuous and sharp drop in cases of COVID-19 and decreases in hospitalizations and numbers of deaths.
Israel is examining cases in which people have had heart inflammation after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. However, no causal relationship between myocarditis and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been established. New assays have been tested with regard to the interchangeability of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, evaluating the potential benefits for adolescents 12 to 15 years of age and in children 6 months to 11 years old with the expectation of promising results through the results of clinical trials in these age groups [43].
The national health surveillance agency in Brazil recently granted the AstraZeneca vaccine authorization for use. The agreement signed between the private and public partners ensured the technology transfer from the Oxford group that developed the AstraZeneca vaccine to the Immunobiological Technology Institute, Bio-Manguinhos at Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, for national production in Brazil in record time.
The CDC shares SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequence data within accessible databases published by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and the Global Initiative on Sharing Avian Influenza Data (GISAID), which overviews variants/mutations (https://covariants.org/per-variant, accessed on 5 January 2022), has also been used to track variants through a map of tracked variant occurrences and relative variant genome frequencies per region. According to NCBI, up to now, 7236 studies for COVID-19 have been documented in 148 countries, with 614 vaccine studies, 1958 drug studies, and 648 mapped drug names. SARS-CoV-2 genome annotation, sequence record, graphical display, and curated gene records have been shown at Genome Reference Sequence (NC_045512) by NCBI SARS-CoV-2 Resources (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/, accessed on 5 January 2022). More information about the control of respiratory and related diseases can be found on the website of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) [20].
It will be important to monitor COVID-19 variants through the SARS-CoV-2 surveillance system, particularly as associated with international travel, which favors the spread of the virus and notably emerging variants. Records of new detected variants are being updated all the time. Thus, the tracking of strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that are in worldwide circulation can be viewed in real time on the website https://www.gisaid. org/hcov19-variants/ (accessed on 5 January 2022) including a map of tracked variant occurrence with phylodynamic of pandemic coronavirus variant VOC Delta G/478K.V1 (B.1.617.2) first detected in India. Therefore, the importance of genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 is constantly monitored.
Real-time tracking of SARS-CoV-2 evolution and the appearance of new variants involves the use of epidemiological and molecular tools and the website https://nextstrain. org (accessed on 5 January 2022).
Irrespective of the vaccine administered and the technological platform for vaccine production, various characteristics condition the use of a vaccine in the current pandemic: formulation in sterile liquid or in as a lyophilized preparation, whether it is single-use or multidose, dose, stability, route of administration, safety, immunogenicity, and target population [34]. One of the critical points of vaccination is the potential risk for allergic reaction to some types of vaccine components. The current available vaccines do not contain relevant allergens such as egg components, gelatin, latex, or preservatives. All COVID-19 vaccines are metal-free, but both mRNA COVID- 19 Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG).
The active and inactive ingredients of three vaccines (i) Pfizer-BioNTech (mRNA) in different formulations according to each age (5-11 years-orange cap; and over 12 years-gray cap); (ii) Moderna (mRNA); (iii) Janssen (viral vector) have been already described in detail (Appendix C at reference [20]). Patients with contraindications should be referred to an allergist and immunologist for follow-up and should request a consultation from the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment COVIDvax project [21]. Even so, vaccination is recommended using other technological platforms, such as inactivated (classic), and not new-generation technological platforms, such as mRNA COVID- 19 [20]. There are important considerations for COVID-19 vaccination in moderately or severely immunocompromised people, and relevant medical supervision should be established in those population, such as, for example, patients who received organ transplants. Finally, a relevant group that requires relevant care is pregnant and lactating women [20].
Several research centers continue the development of new vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 using advanced technologies focused on new target molecules and new application forms, such as the nasal spray to induce mucosal immunity. Most of these clinical trials are in stages 1, 2, and 3 and plan for scale-up of your mRNA drug, for example.
A novel possibility for the treatment of COVID-19 is the use of monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies such as casirivimab and imdevimab bind to the spike protein and thereby prevent the virus from entering the host cells by recognizing the ACE-2 receptor.
In laboratory tests, SARS-CoV-2 variants containing the L452R or E484K substitution in the spike protein cause a marked reduction in susceptibility to bamlanivimab and possibly also etesevimab and casirivimab [20].
The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been central to most of the diagnostic tests and vaccines against COVID-19. The problem is that it can easily mutate, resulting in variants. The nucleocapsid protein is a promising alternative target because it is more strongly conserved among coronaviruses.
Some biopharmaceuticals are evaluating the proposed interchangeability of technologies such as viral vector-based and mRNA-based vaccines [51] or inactivated and adenoviral-vectored vaccines [52] adopted in different laboratories for the development of new viral vaccines due to the emergence of new genomic variants and for the administration of booster doses in the vaccinated population. Thus, a booster dose with a vaccine from a different technological platform (heterologous vaccine) has been shown to have a more effective immune response by increasing the titer of neutralizing antibodies. The course of the pandemic will probably only be controlled by genomic surveillance that tracks variants of SARS-CoV-2. Until that time, Delta continues to be the predominant circulating variant around the world. Finally, the coadministration of COVID-19 vaccines with other vaccines at the same time and the interchangeability of COVID-19 vaccine products-mainly booster doses to improve the immune response-should be evaluated individually in controlled clinical studies.