{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02342116269343371, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0012547051442910915, 'mean_word_length': 4.6548463356974, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Editor's Spotlight

In a new feature, as the Editor-in-Chief, I will offer up some thoughts on select articles as they appear in the pages of TOCHI (or to be more precise, as they grace the ACM's digital library, given our desire to turn around accepted manuscripts to the research community as quickly as possible—not to mention the electronic-first nature of publishing these days). And in addition, I will always strive to give an overview of all the content in each issue, to the extent possible. But before I unshutter the brilliant beacon for the first time, with Issue 23:1 as its deserving focus, let me briefly set the context. The purpose of these spotlight editorials is to help frame the contributions of the research that we publish in the wider context of the field as well as to direct attention to articles that may be of especial interest. That, of course, serves not only our readers but also our authors—all of them— because by implication, bringing attention to our great content raises the profile of the entire journal. By highlighting certain articles, my intent is not to suggest that others are not worthy of your attention. Far from it. Every article we publish has received exquisite attention from our editorial board, so the TOCHI brand in and of itself tells you that the content is always absolutely sterling. Hence, these are not critical reviews or critiques. These articles have already passed the gauntlet of rigorous peer review, and so my purpose here is to help guide our readers as to the nature and importance of the contributions we publish. As such, my hope is that both newcomers to the field of human-computer interaction (who may be missing some of the implicit framing and motivation that underlies many papers) as well as seasoned practitioners and students of HCI (who may be quickly scanning the journal's contents to see what catches their eye) can benefit from these remarks and reflections. As well, astute authors-to-be can perhaps gain a few insights as to what level of contribution is necessary to pass muster at the journal—not to mention the ways of conveying one's results that tend to best resonate with TOCHI's reviewers and our Editorial Board. To fully absorb and appreciate both the strengths and limitations of each article's scientific contributions, one must read them in detail, of course, as I hope you will be moved …