{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03577712609970674, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02287390029325513, 'mean_word_length': 4.744107744107744, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison between phacoemulsification and the Blumenthal technique of manual small-incision cataract surgery combined with trabeculectomy.

OBJECTIVE
To compare results of filtration combined with either phacoemulsification or the Blumenthal technique of manual small-incision cataract surgery.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
Records of glaucoma "triple" operations from March 1997 to May 2000 were reviewed. Seventy-eight eyes (70 patients) that underwent phaco-triple were compared with 86 eyes (80 patients) that underwent the Blumenthal technique of manual small-incision cataract surgery combined with filtration (Blumenthal triple). Three minutes of 0.4 mgs/ml Mitomycin was used in all eyes. Posterior chamber IOLs were implanted through 5.5-mm incisions in both groups. Outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and achievement of target IOP. Fourteen patients who underwent phacoemulsification-triple in one eye and Blumenthal triple in the other eye were also evaluated separately.


RESULTS
The minimum follow-up period was 6 months (range 6-30 months). At last follow-up review, mean reduction in IOP was 17.7 mm Hg (+/- 9.3 mm Hg) in the phaco group and 17.1 mm Hg (+/- 10 mm Hg) in the Blumenthal group. At last visit, target IOP was achieved in 75.6% of the phaco group and 73% of the Blumenthal group. There was no significant difference between groups in IOP reduction or achievement of target IOP. In the 14 patients who had undergone phaco-triple in one eye and Blumenthal-triple in the other, there was no inter-eye difference in IOP reduction.


CONCLUSIONS
In this small retrospective study we could not demonstrate a difference in IOP outcomes between the two procedures.