{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02696793002915452, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.184684684684685, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
From the Twin Cities to "Twin" States: Legislating the Classroom Placement of Twins and Other Higher Order Multiples

As reproductive technology progresses, more and more aspiring parents are turning to science for help in starting their families. Hormone therapy, in-vitro fertilization (IVF), and other assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are becoming commonplace alternatives to natural conception. These alternatives, though often costly and time-consuming, are providing the results that many aspiring parents desire—children. In fact, due to the nature of the process, these methods may be doing too good of a job, as they frequently result in the birth of twins, triplets, and other higher order multiples. Without delving deep into the science, women using hormone therapy take hormones to encourage either the production or release of eggs. ARTs, on the other hand, typically involve more technological and invasive methods that tend to combine the egg and sperm outside of the body. The hope in each type of procedure is that the chances for fertilization and subsequent implantation will increase, producing a child. Often a child is produced, but occasionally, more than one egg or embryo will implant in the uterus, leading to the production of twins, triplets, or other higher order multiples. Though many parents may not be completely prepared for the