{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015178571428571428, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0017857142857142857, 'mean_word_length': 5.962732919254658, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness on different ovarian stimulation regimens during in-vitro fertilization.

Endometrial thickness was measured ultrasonographically in three groups of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) on three different ovulation induction regimens. The endometrial thickness was comparable on all three regimens and similar to that observed in a group of spontaneously ovulating, normal, fertile controls. These patterns of endometrial thickness were observed despite significantly higher levels of serum oestradiol-17 beta in all of the hyperstimulated cycles, suggesting that in the normal cycle a maximum response in terms of endometrial development may be achieved. In the three conception cycles endometrial thickness continued to increase throughout the luteal phase, whilst in non-conception cycles plateauing of thickness increase occurred in the mid-luteal phase and reduction in late luteal phase. Whether ultrasonographic evaluation of endometrium during IVF stimulation cycles has any prognostic value regarding prediction of conception has yet to be determined.