{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016644474034620507, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009320905459387484, 'mean_word_length': 4.780769230769231, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Place of Reforms in Western Structuring Process of Ottoman State and Their Effect on Modernization (1718-1789)

When the crackle sounds started to be heard after the middle of the 17th century, that this wasn’t a temporary sound was understood. In order to understood the reason of these illnesses, old laws and sources were being examined and these were being told to the sultans and statesmen who could take the State to a traditional structure. The Ottoman State fell in luxury and dissipation in the pursuit of a tulip in the 18th century. In this peace term, the Ottomans knew Europeans very closely. The Ottoman State’s widening policy gave shape to its State structure and inner order. The Ottoman administrators sent ambassadors to Vienna and Paris after the Treaty of Passarowitz and wanted them to inform themselves not only about politics and diplomacy but also about social and cultural events and interesting things. Europe, which was examined by Ottoman Statesmen with a new eye, was living “Enlightenment Age”. It was understood that in reform studies made in the 18th century the Ottoman remained behind Europe. The effect of the West is clearly seen in these innovation studies. The effect of the West is clearly seen in these innovation studies. Although reforms studies were tried to be made in every area in this term, especially military area reforms were given importance. The Ottoman State stopped its widening policy across Europe and shaped its inner order and State structure.