{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016938519447929738, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00878293601003764, 'mean_word_length': 4.885608856088561, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Multiple patient samples of an analyte improve detection of changes in clinical status.

CONTEXT
When comparing results over time, biologic variation must be statistically incorporated into the evaluation of laboratory results to identify a physiologic change. Traditional methods compare the difference in 2 values with the standard deviation (SD) of the biologic variation to indicate whether a "true" physiologic change has occurred.


OBJECTIVE
To develop methodology to reduce the effect of biologic variation on the difference necessary to detect changes in clinical status in the presence of biologic variation.


DESIGN
The standard test for change compares the difference between 2 points with the 95% confidence limit, given as +/- 1.96 x square root of 2 x SD. We examined the effect of multiple data pairs on the confidence limit.


RESULTS
Increasing the number of data pairs using the formula 1.96 x square root of 2 x SD, where n = number of data pairs, significantly reduces the difference between values necessary to achieve a 95% confidence limit.


CONCLUSIONS
Evaluating multiple paired sets of patient data rather than a single pair results in a substantial decrease in the difference between values necessary to achieve a given confidence interval, thereby improving the sensitivity of the evaluation. A practice of using multiple patient samples results in enhanced power to detect true changes in patient physiology. Such a testing protocol is warranted when small changes in the analyte precede serious clinical events or when the SD of the biologic variation is large.