{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022564102564102566, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008205128205128205, 'mean_word_length': 5.825174825174825, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Standing Committee on Antarctic Logistics and Operations (SCALOP) Report of meeting, Bologna, Italy 20–21 June 1991

proposed activity to enable a decision-maker to compare the environmental consequences of all alternatives being considered, including the proposed activity. The respective consequences of the alternatives, both for the environment and for scientific activities, should be considered during the evaluation. Examples of alternatives include the use of different locations or sites for the activity, use of different technologies, use of pre-existing facilities. The alternative of not proceeding with the proposed activity (ie the no-action alternative) should be included in any analysis of environmental impacts to provide appropriate context for understanding the impacts of the proposed activity. For example, natural changes in biota or climate that have been verified through empirical investigation or generally-accepted principles should be described.