{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016913319238900635, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012684989429175475, 'mean_word_length': 4.780487804878049, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis: Results of a Survey 1

In the past ten years a number of new methods of diagnosing deep vein thrombosis have been introduced, and it is of interest to consider how these are being used in practice, and what clinicians feel about their advantages and disadvantages. I have confined this small survey to the investigation of postoperative deep vein thrombosis. Questionnaires were sent to 50 surgeons and 32 replies were received (Table 1).