{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020537124802527645, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0007898894154818325, 'mean_word_length': 5.668421052631579, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Review: Prostate capsule sparing radical cystectomy: oncologic safety and clinical outcome

Objectives: Prostate capsule sparing radical cystectomy (PSRC) is a modification of the traditional surgical approach to radical cystectomy and neobladder, which offers the prospect of improved preservation of erectile function and continence. Methods: This is a review of the literature regarding the oncologic and quality of life outcomes of this approach for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, and a comparison of these results to conventional cystoprostatectomy and neobladder. Results: There are a limited number of studies addressing prostate capsule or prostate sparing cystectomy. All are retrospective, non-comparative and not uniform in terms of patient selection and technique. Long-term follow-up is lacking. The incidence of synchronous and or metachronous prostate cancer and TCC of the prostatic urethra is lower than that found in conventional cystoprostatectomy. This is likely due to pre-operative patient selection, restricting the procedure to those with no evidence of prostatic involvement by either disease. The local recurrence rate is 5%, comparable to standard cystoprostatectomy. Recurrence free and overall survival rates are comparable.