{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01867816091954023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02442528735632184, 'mean_word_length': 5.514018691588785, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
States' definitions and procedures for identifying children with mental retardation: comparison over nine years.

Results of a survey of state departments of public instruction regarding eligibility criteria for the identification of children with mental retardation were reported and compared to those obtained in a review of state guidelines in 1981-1982 and 1985-1986. Results indicated that states continue to vary widely in their definitions and procedures for identifying children with mental retardation. However, over the 9 years covered by the study, more and more states mentioned or specified each of the following types of assessments: IQ, adaptive behavior, and academic achievement.