{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029009304871373837, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011494252873563218, 'mean_word_length': 6.030769230769231, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Land and Class in Kenya Christopher Leo Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984, pp. xii, 224

(215). Unlike Mazzeo, Meyns identifies complementarities as well as contradictions: "diversification as an important element of national self-reliant development strategy can strengthen collective self-reliance by increasing complementarities between developing countries. As competition between developing countries is largely determined by their dependence on the world economic system, reducing dependence by diversification will also reduce such competition" (214-15). The analytical, conceptual and historical review by the editor situates the comparative African cases, including his own on lessons from the defunct East African Community, and is a match for his cautious conclusion: African inequalities, interand intra-state, may yet undermine continental self-reliance. Mazzeo's concern for elite interests (257) points to the possibility of more materialist analysis, which Mytelka and Meyns advance somewhat. The collective tone of the volume is revisionist regionalism, from the legalism of Woodie and political preoccupations of Gordenker and Mathews to the orthodox (West African) case studies of Asante and Fredland. In a spirit of relevant revisionism, transcending federalist-functionalist and subregional-continental debates, Mazzeo advances his own dialectical reformulation based on the chequered history of African regionalism and the redefinition of development itself: "regional cooperation among developing countries, to start with, should be an instrument of nation-building and satisfaction of basic needs" (163). The new international division of labour makes the reconceptualization and revitalization of regionalism in Africa an imperative; the crisis merely reinforces the urgency of implementation.