{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027346177750155375, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013673088875077687, 'mean_word_length': 5.098484848484849, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Recombinant activated protein C usage in Scotland: a comparison with published guidelines and a survey of attitudes *

Severe sepsis is a common cause of admission to the intensive care unit and is associated with a high hospital mortality. This audit explored the current use of, and attitudes towards, recombinant activated protein C therapy across Scotland, and compared these with current guidance. Patients with severe sepsis were followed for three days. Consideration and/or usage of recombinant activated protein C were compared with two different guidelines. Ninety‐seven patients were admitted to the intensive care unit over the audit period. Recombinant activated protein C was used in nine of these patients. Depending on the criteria used, between 50% and 81% of the patients who qualified for recombinant activated protein C therapy did not receive it. Subsequent to the audit, a survey was performed to study intensive care unit consultants’ attitudes to recombinant activated protein C therapy. A total of 125 consultants responded to the survey (77%). Of these, 104 (83%) stated that they used recombinant activated protein C in their clinical practice, 56 (52%) of whom prescribed it to patients with two‐organ failures and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of ≥ 25. Thirty‐nine respondents (38%) stated that two‐organ failures alone would be an adequate trigger for therapy. We conclude that recombinant activated protein C is potentially under‐used to treat severe sepsis. Many consultants seem to reserve the drug for the most severely ill sub group of patients.