{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012557077625570776, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.219858156028369, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Institutional reform paths

Broadly speaking, institutional reformers decide about the sequencing of types of reforms, either addressing institutional quality or macroeconomic stability. This paper develops a dynamic population game, in which agents play a simple anonymous-exchange game of cooperating or defecting. Agents switch to the strategy with higher expected payoff. Reformers can affect the payoff structure of the stage game in order to maximize the number of cooperators in the population by either enacting legal reform or focusing on the macro outlook of the economy. Reform is cumulative and starts from initial conditions. Reform effort per period of time is capped. On the basis of the theoretical model the paper makes predictions under which conditions which types of reforms should be enacted first and under which conditions reform will not be successful.