{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020074349442379184, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.231481481481482, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Case study: Correction of angular deformity post-trans-tibial amputation to improve prosthesis fit and comfort

Background: This case report describes the revision of a trans-tibial amputation complicated by a proximal malunited fracture. It demonstrates the complexity of decisions involved in revisions of this nature. Case description and methods: The patient presented has a painful stump due to breakdown of soft tissues. She had been suffering for over a year with pressure sores and inability to use a prosthesis resulting from this, decreasing her quality of life. Malunion of a tibial fracture proximal to the amputation complicated her condition. Findings and outcomes: Initially it was feared that the amputation level would be converted to a through-knee amputation, but wedge osteotomy of the tibia allowed coverage of the stump, increasing functionality for the patient, while still maintaining a below-knee stump. Conclusion: This report highlights the importance of addressing the cause of soft tissue problems in an amputation revision, which must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Clinical relevance This case offers an insight into the decision-making process in limb reconstruction and suggests a solution for similar cases. It is important that all surgical options are considered before amputation length is sacrificed.