{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025412960609911054, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007623888182973317, 'mean_word_length': 4.880597014925373, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Heidegger and Aquinas: An Essay on Overcoming Metaphysics by John D. Caputo (review)

incomprehensibility (p. 167). The theist must specify such points, but the reader of this text cannot be satisfied with this advice at this juncture. Ward has built his theism on explanatory force and final intelligibility. Had he structured his appeal with rigorous metaphysical scrutiny we might know the terms of silence. As it stands, his advice has the ring of indiscriminate fideism: What is simply explanatory and intelligible is supported with ultimate silence. This is a shame, for his image of the moral agent sets forth the true nobility of the religious life, and his "suggestion" that God is the free determinator of free determinant agency incites the best of met111physical speculation.