{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019441069258809233, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007290400972053463, 'mean_word_length': 5.387596899224806, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The case for digital image capture during procedures

Since the development of the video computer chip in the 1980s, endoscopic technology has revolutionized medical diagnosis and treatment with images of internal body cavities able to be magnified and projected onto television screens in real time [1]. Despite this decades-long history and wide use across a range of specialities, there is inconsistency in the ways these images are recorded for later access. As an example of the inconsistency between specialties, during colonoscopy it is common practice to digitally store images of specific landmarks within the gastrointestinal tract to demonstrate the completeness of the study. In comparison, in more time-critical applications such as video-assisted intubation, recording of digital imagery is often omitted [2].