{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03179409538228615, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004542013626040878, 'mean_word_length': 5.480392156862745, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison of alternative continuous display techniques with heterogeneous multi-zone disks

A number of recent technological trends have made data intensive applications such as continuous media (audio and video) servers a reality. These servers are expected to play an important role in applications such as video-on-demand, digital library, news-on-demand, distance learning, etc. Continuous media applications are data intensive and might require storage subsystems that consist of hundreds of (multi-zone) disk drives. With the current technological trends, a homogeneous disk subsystem might evolve to consist of a heterogeneous collection of disk drives. Given such a storage subsystem, the system must continue to support a hiccup-free display of audio and video clips. This study describes extensions of four continuous display techniques for multi-zone disk drives to a heterogeneous platform. These techniques include IBM's Logical Track [21], HP's Track Pairing [4], and USC's FIXB [9] and deadline driven techniques [10]. We quantify the performance tradeoff associated with these techniques using analytical models and simulation studies. The obtained results demonstrate tradeoffs between the cost per simultaneous stream supported by a technique, the wasted disk space, and the incurred startup latency.