{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01601164483260553, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.679611650485437, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Languages that Capture Complexity Classes

We present a series of operators of apparently increasing power which when added to first-order logic produce a series of languages in which exactly the properties checkable in a certain complexity class may be expressed. We thus give alternate characterizations of most important complexity classes. We also introduce reductions appropriate for our setting: first-order translations, and a restricted, quantifier free version of these called projection translations. We show that projection translations are a uniform version of Valiant’s projections, and that the usual complete problems remain complete via these very restrictive reductions.