{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03339634530560807, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013862633900441084, 'mean_word_length': 4.8597785977859775, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Oral cancer development in lichen planus and related conditions -3.0 evidence level-: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

A systematic review of systematic reviews -aka overview of reviews, a novel type of study design providing a tertiary level of evidence- is presented on systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MTA) evaluating the cancer development in oral lichen planus (OLP), oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) and oral lichenoid reactions (OLR). We searched for SR-MTAs published before January-2021. We evaluated the methodological quality of SR-MTAs using AMSTAR2 and checked the quality of evidence. Inclusion criteria were met by seven SR-MTAs. Oral cancer ratios ranged between 0.44-2.28% for OLP, between 1.88-3.80% for OLL, and 1.71% for OLR. Significant factors on cancer development reported in SR-MTAs were the presence of epithelial dysplasia, the consumption of tobacco and alcohol, the infection by the hepatitis C virus, the presence of atrophic and erosive lesions and the location on the tongue. Only one of the SRs assessed the quality of evidence, and most of them were judged to be of critically low methodological quality. In conclusion, based on the reported evidence on cancer incidence in OLP our results reaffirm classifying OLP as an oral potentially malignant disorder. In relation to OLLs and OLRs, larger studies are necessary to provide further scientific evidence in this regard. Future follow up studies on OLP and related lesions should be carried out under stricter criteria that improve their quality of evidence and methodological quality.