{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031101164859126642, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02077236472140931, 'mean_word_length': 4.866038370918883, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Efficacy and safety of monthly oral minodronate in patients with involutional osteoporosis

Summary Monthly minodronate at 30 or 50 mg had similar efficacy as 1 mg daily in terms of change in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers with similar safety profiles. This new regimen provides patients with a new option for taking minodronate. Introduction Minodronate at a daily oral dose of 1 mg has been proven to have antivertebral fracture efficacy. In the present study, the efficacy and safety of oral minodronate at monthly doses of either 30 mg or 50 mg were compared with a daily dose of 1 mg. Methods A total of 692 patients with involutional osteoporosis were randomized to receive minodronate at either 30 or 50 mg monthly or a daily dose of 1 mg. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 12 months. Total hip BMD, bone turnover markers, serum calcium (Ca), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were also evaluated. Results Minodronate at monthly doses of 30 or 50 mg were noninferior to the 1 mg daily dose in terms of change in LS-BMD. Changes in total hip BMD were also comparable. Although a transient decrease in serum Ca and increase in PTH levels were observed in all three groups at slightly different magnitudes and time courses, changes in bone turnover markers were comparable among the different dosage groups with a similar time course. Safety profiles were also comparable. Conclusion Minodronate at monthly doses of 30 or 50 mg has similar efficacy to the daily 1 mg dose in terms of BMD and bone turnover markers with similar tolerability.


Introduction
Minodronate is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate with a potent inhibitory effect on bone resorption. In a head-to-head comparison of the effects of minodronate with alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients, daily 1 mg minodronate resulted in similar increases in lumbar spine (LS) and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) after 12 months with similar safety profiles [1]. A randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan revealed that daily 1 mg minodronate reduced vertebral fractures by 59% in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis [2]. Daily 1 mg minodronate has been approved to treat involutional osteoporosis in Japan.
Most oral bisphosphonates originally developed as a daily regimen have been shown to have equivalent efficacy with weekly and/or monthly regimens [3][4][5][6][7]. Since less frequent dosing, preferred by most patients, could result in better treatment compliance with better outcomes [8], we conducted a study to determine if minodronate could be administered as a monthly regimen. The present randomized, double-blind, active-controlled 1-year study was undertaken to determine whether or not once monthly oral minodronate at doses of 30 and 50 mg provides similar efficacy and safety as the 1-mg daily regimen in patients with involutional osteoporosis. The primary efficacy analysis was the test of the noninferiority of the mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD) in the monthly minodronate groups compared with the daily dose group after 1 year. The safety profiles of the monthly 30-and 50-mg regimens and the daily 1-mg regimen were also compared.

Patient enrollment
We studied men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, aged 51 to 89 years, who had a BMD below 70% (T-score −2.6 at the LS) of the young adult mean (YAM) or a BMD below 80% (T-score −1.7 at the LS) of the YAM with at least one fragility fracture, as defined by the criteria of the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research [9]. Vertebral fractures were assessed by X-ray films of the vertebrae and were diagnosed in accordance with the criteria of the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Men with a total hip BMD below 70% (T-score −2.6 at the total hip) of the YAM were also eligible. Subjects were excluded if they had disorders such as primary hyperparathyroidism; Cushing's syndrome; premature menopause due to hypothalamic, pituitary or gonadal insufficiency, or other causes of secondary osteoporosis; or if there were any radiographic findings that might affect bone densitometry assessment. Subjects with peptic ulcer were excluded. Subjects were excluded if they had received bisphosphonate injections, strontium, or RANKL antibody at any time. Subjects were also excluded if they had taken oral bisphosphonates within the previous 1 year or for at least 30 days during the previous 2 years up until 1 year before the first dose of the study medication. Subjects were also excluded if they had taken glucocorticoids, calcitonin, vitamin K, active vitamin D compounds, or hormone replacement therapy within the previous 2 months; had serum calcium (Ca) levels above 10.6 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) or below 8.0 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L); had serum creatinine levels above 1.5 mg/dL (133 μmol/L); or had clinically significant hepatic disorders.
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the appropriate institutional review boards. All subjects gave written informed consent before undergoing any examination or study procedure, all of which were conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice. Eligibility of patients for enrollment was evaluated by H. Hagino-Rehabilitation Division, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago; M. Ito-Department of Radiology, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Nagasaki; and T. Sone-Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama.

Study design
This study was a randomized, double-blind, activecontrolled, parallel-group, multicenter study conducted at 31 sites in Japan. Subjects who met all the entry criteria were enrolled and sequentially assigned an allocation number independent of study site. Subjects were randomized to take minodronate (Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at 1 mg daily, 30 mg monthly, or 50 mg monthly for 12 months. We selected 30-mg monthly dose because it is equivalent to 30-day daily dose of 1 mg. The dose of 50 mg dose was selected based on the pharmacokinetics study (data not shown) that demonstrated monthly bone exposure comparable to daily 1 mg would require 42-to 56-mg single monthly doses because of lower absorption with larger single doses.
Randomization was performed using a computerized system. Subjects were instructed to take their tablet on arising and 30 min before food with plain water. All subjects received daily calcium (610 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplementation once a day after the evening meal. Compliance with the study treatment was assessed through medication diaries and by counting residual medication supplies.

Study outcomes
The primary endpoint of the study was the test of the noninferiority of the mean percent change from baseline in the lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD at 12 months of treatment with the study medication. Secondary endpoints of the study included mean percent change from baseline in the total hip BMD, relative changes in bone turnover markers, and the occurrence of new morphometric vertebral and nonvertebral fractures.

Assessment of BMD
The lumbar spine (L2-L4) and the total hip were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months to determine BMD. All 31 study centers involved in this trial were equipped with a Hologic QDR series for BMD measurements. A central facility (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan by T. Sone) performed quality assurance of the longitudinal adjustment. The DXA machines were adjusted for differences and each machine was calibrated with standardized phantoms.

Assessment of vertebral fractures
Lateral radiographs of the thoracic and lumbar spine were taken at the screening visit to determine the presence of prevalent fractures. Subjects were enrolled based on a visual assessment of prevalent fractures in T4 to L4. All the radiologic specifications and the levels of vertebra at the thoracic and lumbar spine were standardized throughout the study sites. The assessment of prevalent fractures was made if the ratio of anterior or middle vertebral body height to the posterior vertebral body height was less than 0.8 [10]. Quantitative and semiquantitative techniques [11,12] were used to identify incident vertebral fractures in order to determine efficacy. Lateral radiographs of the spine were performed at 12 months for the assessment of incident fractures. A new vertebral fracture was diagnosed if the anterior, posterior, or middle vertebral height had decreased by at least 15% and by 4 mm in a vertebra that was normal at baseline, or diagnosed semiquantitatively by grade progression [10]. Morphological diagnosis of fractures was made by quantitative and semiquantitative assessment of the images using the sequence of films at the central reading facilities of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan by T. Nakamura.

Assessment of nonvertebral fractures
All nonvertebral fractures were identified symptomatically as clinical fractures, and only nontraumatic fractures assessed by investigators were reported. Suspected clinical fractures at six nonvertebral sites (humerus, radius/ulna, subclavia, pelvis, femur, and tibia/fibula) were adjudicated radiographically, and only radiographically confirmed fractures were listed.

Assessment of adverse events
All subjects were questioned about treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) at each visit, and all adverse events reported were analyzed regardless of the investigators' assessments of causality. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (Version 13.0J) was used to categorize reported adverse events.

Statistical analysis
The primary hypothesis of the study was that monthly minodronate (30, 50 mg) would be comparable to daily minodronate (1 mg) in terms of the mean percent change from baseline in LS-BMD after 12 months of treatment. The primary hypothesis was tested using an intentionto-treat (ITT) analysis. The ITT population comprised all randomized subjects. The primary analysis used a last observation carried forward approach for missing values. A Dunnett's test was used to determine the noninferiority of each of the monthly minodronate groups compared to the daily minodronate group. Noninferiority was to be declared if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of difference did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin of −1.9%.
The group mean and standard deviation (SD) or standard error (SE) were calculated for the baseline characteristics, the percent changes from baseline in LS-BMD, total hip BMD, and bone turnover markers and were used to assess the significance of changes between each of the monthly minodronate groups and the daily minodronate group. A Dunnett's test was used to determine whether each of the monthly minodronate groups was significantly different from the daily minodronate group. A paired t test was used to determine whether each of the measured values was significantly different from the baseline. Statistical analyses Fig. 1 Enrollment and outcomes. A total of 1,093 patients were screened, of which 692 were randomized to take minodronate at 30 mg monthly (229 subjects), 50 mg monthly (229 subjects), or 1 mg daily (234 subjects)

Patient disposition
A total of 1,093 patients were screened; of these, 692 patients were randomized, and 690 patients received at least one dose of the study drug (Fig. 1). Baseline characteristics were similar in all three treatment groups (

LS and hip BMD
As shown in Fig. 2, both 30 and 50 mg monthly as well as 1 mg daily minodronate significantly increased LS-BMD from the baseline at all time points. Noninferiority of both monthly regimens to the daily regimen, with percent change in LS-BMD at 12 months as the end point, was determined. For 50 mg monthly minodronate, the estimated treatment difference (50 mg monthly-1 mg daily) was −0.294, with a 95% CI of −1.038 to 0.450, whereas for 30-mg monthly regimen, the difference was −0.873, with a 95% CI of −1.624 to −0.121. For both regimens, the lower bound of the 95% CI was more than the predefined noninferiority margin of −1.9%. At all the other time points, both monthly regimens were not inferior to the daily regimen by more than −1.9% (data not shown). Total hip BMD also increased in all three regimens. The changes were not significantly different among treatment groups.

Bone turnover markers
Urinary NTX, DPD, serum BALP and BGP all significantly decreased from the baseline in all treatment groups (Fig. 3). There was no statistically significant difference in any of the markers at any time points among treatment groups.
Serum Ca and PTH (Fig. 4) A small but significant decrease in serum Ca level was observed in all treatment groups at 2 weeks. At 4 weeks, serum Ca levels were still significantly lower than the baseline value in the daily and 30 mg monthly groups but not in the 50 mg monthly group. Thereafter, the serum Ca level was not statistically different from the baseline in all the treatment groups. At 4 weeks, serum intact PTH significantly increased from the baseline in all the treatment groups, and the daily group showed higher PTH than both monthly groups. Increased PTH was maintained at 12 weeks in the daily and 50 mg monthly groups, but not in the 30 mg monthly group. Thereafter, PTH levels returned to baseline values and were not significantly different among groups.

Fracture
The incidences of vertebral and nonvertebral fracture were similar among treatment groups. Morphometric vertebral fracture occurred in six (2.6%) subjects in the daily minodronate group, five (2.2%) in the 30 mg monthly group, and two (0.9%) in the 50 mg monthly group. Nonvertebral fractures were reported in six subjects (2.6%) in the daily minodronate group (rib, femoral neck, ankle,

Safety
Overall, the drug-related AE profiles were similar in all treatment groups (Table 2). There were no deaths in any of the treatment groups.

Discussion
The present study demonstrated that monthly oral administration of minodronate at a dose of 30 and 50 mg resulted in similar increases in LS and hip BMD as daily administration at a dose of 1 mg. The changes in bone turnover markers were also similar between both monthly regimens and the daily regimen. Safety profiles for the monthly regimens were similar to that of the daily regimen. These results suggest that minodronate, for which a daily dose has been shown to have antivertebral fragility fracture (VFx) efficacy, can be administered monthly in the same manner as risedronate [7,13] and ibandronate [14,15].
In the present study, there was a transient decrease in the serum Ca level and a transient increase in the serum PTH level. The magnitudes and time courses of these changes were slightly different among different regimens. As shown in Fig. 3, although statistically nonsignificant, the magnitude of the inhibition of bone resorption markers was numerically different among groups especially at early time points. This may well be reflected to the differences in the changes of serum Ca and PTH. However, the responses in terms of BMD and bone turnover markers were not different among the three groups. Thus, the influence of subtle differences in Ca and PTH on bone was not clear. Similar transient changes in Ca and PTH were previously reported with oral alendronate [16,17] and risedronate [18] without known effects on bone.
The major limitation of the present study was that it did not have the power to assess antifracture efficacy. However, BMD change has been accepted as a valid surrogate endpoint when evaluating a new dosage schedule for a bisphosphonate for which a fracture benefit has been established [3,4,7,14,19]. Thus far, no oral bisphosphonate has demonstrated antifracture efficacy with a weekly or monthly regimen in randomized controlled trials. The magnitude of BMD change by monthly minodronate in the present study was similar to that achieved by daily minodronate in the previous studies [1]. The changes in bone turnover markers were also comparable [1,2]. These data suggest that the monthly and daily regimens of minodronate would be equally beneficial to bone. Another limitation in this study was that only a limited number of men were recruited. Thus, it was impossible to analyze whether or not minodronate would be equally effective to men as well. However, when the data from all three regimens were combined and analyzed using a per protocol set, the LS-BMD change from the baseline to the end of the study was 5.33% (95% CI 3.00-7.66) in men (n =9), which was comparable to that in women (n= 605) [6.39% (6.09-6.70)]. The change in hip BMD was 1.10% (95% CI −0.34 to 2.53) in men (n= 8), which was smaller than that in women (n=591) [2.94% (2.74-3.13)]. The changes in metabolic bone markers were numerically smaller in men compared with women: changes in serum BALP were −37.3% (−52. The present study demonstrated that oral minodronate administered monthly has comparable efficacy and safety to the daily regimen, which has been shown to have anti-VFx efficacy. This new monthly regimen will give patients with osteoporosis a new dosage option for minodronate, which may lead to better medication compliance for this bisphosphonate.