{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05962732919254658, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04472049689440994, 'mean_word_length': 4.558620689655172, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Clinical evaluation of the ultrasonic root canal instrumentation].

Five hundred and fifty-nine teeth from 432 patient' were divided randomly into the ultrasonic or the hand root canal instrumentation group. The results are shown as follows: Less instrumentation time was needed significantly in the ultrasonic group (anterior tooth: 2.37 +/- 1.37 minutes, posterior tooth: 5.33 +/- 2.83 minutes) than in the hand group (anterior tooth: 3.15 +/- 2.43 minutes, posterior tooth: 8.42 +/- 4.64 minutes); The rate of instrument fracture in the ultrasonic group (5.28%) was significantly lower than in the hand group (10.97%); No significant difference both in the rate of postoperative pain within 1 week after root canal instrumentation and the 1 year treatment effective rate were found between two groups.