{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.034023668639053255, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020710059171597635, 'mean_word_length': 4.960352422907489, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Use of the word monastica in the division of moral philosophy in thirteenth‐century Paris and fifteenth‐century England

The Middle‐English translation of Palladius's treatise De Agricultura has been published in two different modern editions: the Early English Text Society version, edited by Barton Lodge in 1873 and subsequently re‐printed, is based on what Lodge believed to be the unique Colchester manuscript, now London, British Library, MS Additional A. 369;1 the 1896 edition by Mark Liddell, on the other hand, is based on the superior Fitzwilliam manuscript, now Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Duke Humfrey d.2, which includes a tabula, a Proem and epilogues to some of the books, that is, elements that do not belong to the original Latin text.2 Proem and epilogues make frequent reference to the patron who commissioned the translation, Duke Humphrey of Gloucester, and a large section of the Proem is devoted to a description of the patron's accomplishments: he is not only a wise politician and a valiant soldier, but he is also endowed with all knowledge and virtue; a long list of his accomplishments is provided. Stanza 10 is part of this list: The Middle‐English Translation of Palladius De Re Rustica, ed. Mark Liddell. Berlin, 1896. Palladius on Husbondrie, ed. Barton Lodge, Early English Text Society. London, 1873, repr. 2000.