{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025157232704402517, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017470300489168415, 'mean_word_length': 5.253275109170306, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of BOLD and direct‐MR neuronal detection (DND) in the human visual cortex at 3T

Direct‐MR neuronal detection (DND) of transient magnetic fields has recently been investigated as a novel imaging alternative to the conventional BOLD functional MRI (fMRI) technique. However, there remain controversial issues and debate surrounding this methodology, and this study attempts clarification by comparing BOLD responses in the human visual system with those of DND. BOLD relies on indirectly measuring blood oxygenation and flow changes as a result of neuronal activity, whereas the putative DND method is based on the hypothesis that the components of the in vivo neuronal magnetic fields, which lie parallel to the B0 field, can potentially modulate the MR signal, thus providing a means of direct detection of nerve impulses. Block paradigms of checkerboard patterns were used for visual stimulation in both DND and BOLD experiments, allowing detection based on different frequency responses. This study shows colocalization of some voxels with slow BOLD responses and putative fast DND responses using General Linear Model (GLM) analysis. Frequency spectra for the activated voxel cluster are also shown for both stimulated and control data. The mean percentage signal change for the DND responses is 0.2%, corresponding to a predicted neuronal field of 0.14 nT. Magn Reson Med 60:1147–1154, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.