{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.037947450334157286, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019317037443925662, 'mean_word_length': 4.774870032601991, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 2, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cydalima perspectalis in Poland—8 Years of Invasion against the Background of Three Other Invasive Species

The box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) origins from East Asia. In Europe, it was recorded for the first time in 2007, and in Poland in 2012. By the end of 2020, it was found all over Poland. There are no published data on the range of C. perspectalis occurrence in Poland because it is not a quarantine pest in the European Union and is not subject to official monitoring. Data collected in 2018–2020 via a website dedicated to monitoring, for the first time, illustrate the current range and its largest concentrations in southern and central Poland. The monitoring confirmed that the main directions of the invasion are related to the main communication routes of Poland (south-north) and are of a long-distance character. The dispersal pattern corresponds to the model developed for Cameraria ohridella: a stratified dispersal model that considers long-distance road/rail transport. The second important factor contributing to the invasion of C. perspectalis are large human communities enabling rapid local dispersion (a diffusion model). Comparing its invasion with the monitoring data from 2007–2013 of two other invasive pests of Poland: Ostrinia nubilalis and Diabrotica virgifera, shows that a diffusion model best describes the spatial spread of these pests only to uninhabited


Introduction
The natural range of the box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis Walker, 1859) is in Southeast Asia's humid subtropical regions. Described in the mid-nineteenth century from China, it was found in India half a century later. At the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, its presence was confirmed in Korea, Japan, and Russia's the Far East [1][2][3]. C. perspectalis was recorded in Europe for the first time in 2007 in Germany (Baden-Württemberg, the city of Weil am Rhein) and in the Netherlands. Considering the size of the damage done at the place of its first finding should be assumed that it was brought to Europe at least two years earlier. The places of dispersion to Europe are most probably the distribution centers of ornamental plants imported from China in Germany and the Netherlands [1]. Eggs and caterpillars, especially of the earlier stages, move easily along with the boxwood bushes (including cuttings) transported for commercial purposes. Molecular studies of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and II genes indicate that the source of European populations is multiple introductions of insects from eastern China due to the rapid, longdistance transport of boxwood shrubs as part of the ornamental plant trade from this country to Europe. The lack of precise legal regulations in the trade of ornamental plants, the liberalization of the existing law, and the general trade globalization facilitated such a The biology of the species in Poland has not been fully described yet. In Europe, C. perspectalis can develop up to five generations a year depending on the latitude. The main factor limiting its development is temperature, as the lower developmental threshold for the immature stages is 8-12 • C. However, it is known that it has a variable number of generations during the year, depending on weather (mean temperature) conditions too. The female lays gelatinous, transparent eggs with up to 20 in the batches. A maximum of a female can lay up to 500 eggs [3,17]. Depending on the temperature, 2-3 mm long larvae hatch from the eggs after a few to several days. Then, 3-4 weeks later, they reach their maturity size of about 4 cm. At a temperature of 20 • C, the development from hatching to the adult takes about 40 days [5,17]. At 25 • C, the average duration of each larval stage is three days, with an extended photoperiod shortening the development time of the larvae [18]. The pre-pupa stage lasts approximately eight days. At 25 • C, the imago appears after about ten days. The adult insect lives up to two weeks. In autumn, when the temperature drops, the caterpillars build cocoons from the leaves and hibernate [5,17,19]. In Central Europe, where there are usually two generations, the insect needs 518 degree days for the over wintering generation, and 430 for the second generation to complete the cycle. This difference translates into a different mean growth rate, higher in the first generation of insects feeding in spring than in larvae feeding in autumn [17].
Hatching larvae feed as a group first and then disperse. The foraging during the boxwood growing season varies spatially. In spring, most of the larvae feed in the lower parts of the shrubs. In summer, they feed on the middle parts, and in autumn, they feed on leaves in the top part, which causes of plant death [20]. Last instar larvae, in the leaves absence, may feed on the shoots by gnawing out phloem. Foraging is accompanied by the formation of filaments that form dense, hydrophobic clusters of leaves, which facilitates the identification of attacked plants, but makes it difficult to control the larvae, both by chemical and biological methods. The pupa is tied in a cocoon of leaves entwined with yarn, protecting it against low temperatures and pesticides [17,19]. In Central Europe, the insect undergoes obligatory diapause in winter, lasting at least eight weeks. The larva of the 3rd stage of the second generation of insects usually hibernates [5,18]. It forms leaf cocoons, usually inside the bush, making it difficult to assess the degree of plant infestation and making it easier to withstand frosts. Over wintering caterpillars can survive a temperature drop-down to −30 • C, which is not uncommon in north-eastern Poland. Shortening of the photoperiod and the growing food shortage caused by the intensive feeding of the larvae of both generations, exceeding the regenerative capacity of the host plant, may cause diapause as well [3,18].
Recently, Suppo and his team [21] introduced the first phenology model for the box tree moth based on a temperature and photoperiod to simulate the life cycle of this insect and the developmental rate for each life stage. Minimum temperature appeared the most critical parameter for the model, while diapause was negligible. The model shows that higher temperatures associated with global warming can significantly increase the number of pest generations during the year and may lead to the overlapping of successive generations and the over wintering of caterpillars at various instars [21]. Results obtained by Poitou et al. [22] confirmed the positive effect of increasing temperature on the rate and dynamics of diapause termination and lack of stimulatory effect of photoperiod. The recent models of C. perspectalis spreading in Catalonia showed the importance of its host plant presence, dispersal capacity, and climate suitability [23].
On the map of the range of the box tree moth in Europe from 2012, prepared by a team of researchers from CABI-Switzerland [24], Poland was noted as a country where this species does not appear yet. The first information (published in Polish) about C. perspectalis in Poland comes from the village of Michałkowa in the Sowie Mountains (southwestern Poland, Lower Silesia), where the insect was detected in 2012 [25]. The following data on the places where the pest appeared come from 2015. This year, Blaik et al. [25] detected C. perspectalis in Suchy Bór near Opole (Opole voivodeship) and in the downtown Kraków (Lesser Poland), which indicates that the pest infested the southern part of the country. Further confirmed information on the range of C. perspectalis in Poland comes from southeastern Poland (Subcarpathian voivodeship). In the years 2016-2017, insects' presence was detected in the following towns: Grabiny, Rzeszów, Umieszcz, and Zgłobień [26]. This expansion clearly indicated the latitudinal direction of the insect spread in Poland, parallel to the Carpathian arc until the 2017 year.
An example of a quick and destructive boxwood moth invasion is the Botanical Garden in Łódź (central Poland). The first signs of foraging were found in the autumn of 2018, while in June 2021, the last, utterly dead boxwood hedges were removed. The garden does not currently have any boxwood collection (Figure 2a-c).
An important document that authorized us to undertake monitoring activities is the "Proposal for a resolution of the European Parliament on the boxwood moth (Cydalima perspectalis)", which encourages the Commission to:

•
Recognize the box tree moth as a harmful organism under Directive 2000/29/E.C.; • Support research into biological controls for the box tree moth through existing funding programs; • Promote joint monitoring of the box tree moth by the competent European authorities [27].
The recognition by the EU of the need to monitor the boxwood moth in Europe indicates that the importance of this species is very high and noticeable in individual countries where C. perspectalis can pose a severe threat to boxwood hedges and topiaries as well as wild plants. In the last 30 years, the invasion of many insect species, alien to the Polish entomofauna, have been found in Poland [28]. However, some of them were particularly spectacular and of real economic importance. These include the invasions of Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer), Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Western corn rootworm), and Cameraria ohridella (Horse-chestnut leaf miner). There are many differences and similarities to that found for C. perspectalis in their pace and spread directions.
The study aims were to determine the current range of C. perspectalis occurrence in Poland, and the pace and degree of its invasiveness. Obtained data will allow a more precise definition of the threats to the cultivated boxwood, especially those of historical and cultural importance. A comparison of the invasions of the box tree moth with other invasive species in Poland from the last 20 years should enable the use of models of spatial spreading and occurrence developed for other species. Although in 2020, C. perspectalis was recorded almost all over Poland, there are no officially published data on this subject.

Cydalima Perspectalis
In Poland, the official monitoring of pest's occurrence conducted by the Main Inspectorate of Plant Health and Seed Inspection does not cover C. perspectalis. In the European Union, it is not a quarantine organism. For this reason, since its first finding in several locations in the southwest and southern Poland in 2012 [25,26], there is no reliable and systematic information about the directions of the spread of this species. Because box trees are cultivated all over Poland, especially Buxus sempervirens, many scenarios for this insect's spread were possible.
Because there is no system for monitoring the spread of the box tree moth in Poland, in 2018-2020, it was decided to establish its range. Since 2018, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of reports from gardeners and plant breeders in southern and central Poland about damaged box trees as a result of foraging a new, unknown boxwood pest. However, the problem was that in the national database, which is responsible for tracking the spread of various species in Poland, operating as part of the Biodiversity Map conducted by The Polish Biodiversity Information Network (PolBIN, KSIB) in 2018, only one town was listed (Warsaw) to be infested by C. perspectalis [29].
To identify the current range of C. perspectalis occurrence in Poland, the database of the internet website "Allotment and Garden Our Passion" [30], which brings together over 15,000 gardeners from Poland, was used. For this purpose, hobby gardeners gathered around this website provided information via social media (Facebook, Instagram) about the towns where they found the box tree moth on their plants from April 2018 to November 2020. Using the e-mail address provided on the main page of the website using the subwebsite "Contact", they provided the name of the place in their e-mail correspondence, including additional information, e.g., the date of the pest's appearance, photographs, or information (photographs) about the condition of the boxwoods. Each year, these places were verified by analyzing the photos of the damage and/or insects sent and field trips. Inspection visits were carried out annually from April to September, especially to locations from which the submitted documentation raised any doubts (Figure 3a,b). The presence of the box tree moth was verified in all voivodeships (the highest-level administrative division of Poland) from which the reports came. Particular attention was paid to the places farthest from where the box tree moth had already been found in previous reports. The resulting maps of the range of the box tree moth do not cover all the places where C. perspectalis occurs but show critical areas for subsequent reports of this insect's presence.

Cydalima Perspectalis
In total, in 2018-2020, thanks to gardeners and plant breeders, users of the website "The Allotment and the Garden Our Passion" were collecting information from 166 places (towns) in Poland in the form of 674 documented reports on the presence of C. perspectalis in all voivodeships (Figures 4-6 and Tables S1 and S2).   Table 1; 1-16: numbers assigned to individual voivodships).  Table 1.  Table 1.
Three years of social monitoring of C. perspectalis in Poland allow us to conclude that there was an increase in the population size in all voivodeships each year, both in moth-controlled cities (new locations) and in the reported records. In the last 2020 year of research, we revealed the presence of box tree moths in Warmian-Masurian, Kuyavian-Pomeranian, and Podlaskie voivodeships (No.: 3, 6, and 8). The most significant increase in the number of new locations and reported records in 2020 compared to the previous year was found for voivodeships: Greater Poland, Masovia, Silesian, and Subcarpathian (No.: 5, 7, 14, and 16) (Figures 5 and 6).
The northernmost points of the C. perspectalis range recorded in 2018 correspond to the main national and international south-north communication routes. These routes indicate their essential role in the spread of this species to the north of Poland. The most important of them are: the S5 clearway Wrocław-Poznań (Leszno: ); S11-Opole-Poznań (Kalisz: ); motorways: latitudinally running A4 from Opole via Katowice to Kraków along with the A1 motorway running north from Katowice to Łódź () and further to Warsaw () and with the S7 clearway from Kraków to Warsaw ();S19 from Rzeszów to Lublin with a branch to Zamość () (Figure 7).
In 2019, the presence of C. perspectalis was found in 77 localities located in 13 voivodeships. These were the same voivodeships as in the previous years. Additionally, the pest appeared in the country's west and the north in the following voivodeships: West Pomeranian, Pomeranian, and Lubusz (No.: 1, 2, and 4). The pest's appearance in Szczecin and Gdańsk, on the coast of the Baltic Sea, was a big surprise. This year, the most information about the species' appearance came from the south of Poland in the following voivodeships: Silesian, Lesser Poland, and Subcarpathian (No.: 14, 15, and 16) (Figure 8). The confirmed presence of C. perspectalis in Polish port cities on the Baltic Sea (Szczecin and Gdańsk) may result both from the movement along communication routes along the Odra and Warta river valleys (Szczecin) and/or from sea transport from Western Europe (or even from Asia)-the presence of moths in Gdańsk and Szczecin.  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place ( Figure 10).  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expans recorded in 2018-see the text below.
The northernmost points of the C. perspectalis range reco the main national and international south-north communicat dicate their essential role in the spread of this species to the important of them are: the S5 clearway Wrocław-Poznań (Les (Kalisz: ); motorways: latitudinally running A4 from Opo along with the A1 motorway running north from Katowice Warsaw () and with the S7 clearway from Kraków to Warsa Lublin with a branch to Zamość () (Figure 7).
In 2019, the presence of C. perspectalis was found in 77 loca ships. These were the same voivodeships as in the previous y appeared in the country's west and the north in the following anian, Pomeranian, and Lubusz (No.: 1, 2, and 4). The pest's Gdańsk, on the coast of the Baltic Sea, was a big surprise. This about the species' appearance came from the south of Polan ships: Silesian, Lesser Poland, and Subcarpathian (No.: 14, 15, firmed presence of C. perspectalis in Polish port cities on th Gdańsk) may result both from the movement along communic ); S11-Opole-Poznań (Kalisz:   Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below. Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place ( Figure 10).  Table 1; -: extreme, key loc for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international commu tion routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearw (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gd () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north com nication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lith (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the b with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and carpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figu after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to othe vodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voi ship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second la number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivod (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fac the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellen motion took place (Figure 10).
) and with the S7 clearway from Kraków to Warsaw (  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below. Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place ( Figure 10). ); S19 from Rzeszów to Lublin with a branch to Zamość (  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below. Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place ( Figure 10). ) (Figure 7). In 2019, the presence of C. perspectalis was found in 77 localities located in 13 voivodeships. These were the same voivodeships as in the previous years. Additionally, the pest appeared in the country's west and the north in the following voivodeships: West Pomeranian, Pomeranian, and Lubusz (No.: 1, 2, and 4). The pest's appearance in Szczecin and Gdańsk, on the coast of the Baltic Sea, was a big surprise. This year, the most information about the species' appearance came from the south of Poland in the following voivodeships: Silesian, Lesser Poland, and Subcarpathian (No.: 14, 15, and 16) (Figure 8). The confirmed presence of C. perspectalis in Polish port cities on the Baltic Sea (Szczecin and Gdańsk) may result both from the movement along communication routes along the Odra and Warta river valleys (Szczecin) and/or from sea transport from Western Europe (or even from Asia)-the presence of moths in Gdańsk and Szczecin.  Table 1;  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expa recorded in 2018-see the text below.
The northernmost points of the C. perspectalis range rec the main national and international south-north communic dicate their essential role in the spread of this species to th important of them are: the S5 clearway Wrocław-Poznań (L (Kalisz: ); motorways: latitudinally running A4 from Op along with the A1 motorway running north from Katowic Warsaw () and with the S7 clearway from Kraków to Wars Lublin with a branch to Zamość () (Figure 7).
In 2019, the presence of C. perspectalis was found in 77 lo ships. These were the same voivodeships as in the previous appeared in the country's west and the north in the followin anian, Pomeranian, and Lubusz (No.: 1, 2, and 4). The pest' Gdańsk, on the coast of the Baltic Sea, was a big surprise. Th about the species' appearance came from the south of Pola ships: Silesian, Lesser Poland, and Subcarpathian (No.: 14, 15 firmed presence of C. perspectalis in Polish port cities on Gdańsk) may result both from the movement along commun and Warta river valleys (Szczecin) and/or from sea transpo even from Asia)-the presence of moths in Gdańsk and Szcz  Table 1; -: extrem for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and internationa tion routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of inse () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main southnication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn a The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border w (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely in number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Sil carpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is sim after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparabl vodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Sile ship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathia (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results fro the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its motion took place ( Figure 10).  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2018-see the text below.
The northernmost points of the C. perspectalis range recorded in 2018 correspond to the main national and international south-north communication routes. These routes indicate their essential role in the spread of this species to the north of Poland. The most important of them are: the S5 clearway Wrocław-Poznań (Leszno: ); S11-Opole-Poznań (Kalisz: ); motorways: latitudinally running A4 from Opole via Katowice to Kraków along with the A1 motorway running north from Katowice to Łódź () and further to Warsaw () and with the S7 clearway from Kraków to Warsaw ();S19 from Rzeszów to Lublin with a branch to Zamość () (Figure 7).
In 2019, the presence of C. perspectalis was found in 77 localities located in 13 voivodeships. These were the same voivodeships as in the previous years. Additionally, the pest appeared in the country's west and the north in the following voivodeships: West Pomeranian, Pomeranian, and Lubusz (No.: 1, 2, and 4). The pest's appearance in Szczecin and Gdańsk, on the coast of the Baltic Sea, was a big surprise. This year, the most information about the species' appearance came from the south of Poland in the following voivodeships: Silesian, Lesser Poland, and Subcarpathian (No.: 14, 15, and 16) (Figure 8). The confirmed presence of C. perspectalis in Polish port cities on the Baltic Sea (Szczecin and Gdańsk) may result both from the movement along communication routes along the Odra and Warta river valleys (Szczecin) and/or from sea transport from Western Europe (or even from Asia)-the presence of moths in Gdańsk and Szczecin.  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
20 confirms the role of the main national and international communicaesence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 elkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk nificant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north commuthe S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). ication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania de it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border o Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9). of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the ants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Sub-4 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), lation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voihern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodesovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest tants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship latively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent pro- (Figure 10).   Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place (Figure 10).  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communica-tion routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north commu-nication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg ().
The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Sub-carpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voi-vodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivode-ship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent pro-motion took place (Figure 10).
)-places only about 100 km away from Warsaw or Łódź or 50 km from Lublin ( Figure 8). In 2020, there was a further large-scale expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland. Information about the pest's outbreak came from as many as 148 localities located in all 16 voivodeships that are part of Poland's administrative division. The last three voivodeships are Warmian-Masurian, Kuyavian-Pomeranian, and Podlaskie (No.: 3, 6, and 8). In addition to Gdańsk and Szczecin, the pest was recorded in such towns in the north of the country as Elbląg, Olsztyn, Ełk, Suwałki, and Bielsk Podlaski. The year 2020, however, confirmed earlier observations that currently C. perspectalis is most abundant in southern Poland, where it is warmer than in the north and where the vegetation period is slightly more extended (Figure 9).  Table 1;  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expa recorded in 2018-see the text below.
The northernmost points of the C. perspectalis range rec the main national and international south-north communic dicate their essential role in the spread of this species to th important of them are: the S5 clearway Wrocław-Poznań (L (Kalisz: ); motorways: latitudinally running A4 from Op along with the A1 motorway running north from Katowic Warsaw () and with the S7 clearway from Kraków to Wars Lublin with a branch to Zamość () (Figure 7).
In 2019, the presence of C. perspectalis was found in 77 lo ships. These were the same voivodeships as in the previous appeared in the country's west and the north in the followin anian, Pomeranian, and Lubusz (No.: 1, 2, and 4). The pest' Gdańsk, on the coast of the Baltic Sea, was a big surprise. Th about the species' appearance came from the south of Pola ships: Silesian, Lesser Poland, and Subcarpathian (No.: 14, 15 firmed presence of C. perspectalis in Polish port cities on Gdańsk) may result both from the movement along commun and Warta river valleys (Szczecin) and/or from sea transpo even from Asia)-the presence of moths in Gdańsk and Szcz  Table 1; -: extrem for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and internationa tion routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of inse () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main southnication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn a The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border w (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely in number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Sil carpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is sim after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparabl vodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Sile ship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathia (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results fro the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its motion took place ( Figure 10).  Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of recorded in 2018-see the text below.
The northernmost points of the C. perspectalis range recorded the main national and international south-north communication ro dicate their essential role in the spread of this species to the north important of them are: the S5 clearway Wrocław-Poznań (Leszno:  (Kalisz: ); motorways: latitudinally running A4 from Opole via along with the A1 motorway running north from Katowice to Łó Warsaw () and with the S7 clearway from Kraków to Warsaw () Lublin with a branch to Zamość () (Figure 7).
In 2019, the presence of C. perspectalis was found in 77 localities ships. These were the same voivodeships as in the previous years. appeared in the country's west and the north in the following voivo anian, Pomeranian, and Lubusz (No.: 1, 2, and 4). The pest's appea Gdańsk, on the coast of the Baltic Sea, was a big surprise. This year, about the species' appearance came from the south of Poland in th ships: Silesian, Lesser Poland, and Subcarpathian (No.: 14, 15, and 1 firmed presence of C. perspectalis in Polish port cities on the Bal Gdańsk) may result both from the movement along communication and Warta river valleys (Szczecin) and/or from sea transport from even from Asia)-the presence of moths in Gdańsk and Szczecin.
) reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk (   Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below. Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place (Figure 10).   Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below.
Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place (Figure 10).
) and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski (  Figure 9. Cydalima perspectalis occurrence range in Poland in 2020, and its final possible routes of spread. Each grey point indicates the presence of a pest found in the course of social monitoring in 2020; red lines and numbers indicate the main directions of the species expansion to the north in 2020; 1-16: numbers assigned to individual voivodships; see Table 1; -: extreme, key locations for the expansion of C. perspectalis in Poland, recorded in 2020-see the text below. Data from 2020 confirms the role of the main national and international communication routes. The presence of C. perspectalis in Szczecin () reflects the route of clearway S3 (from Gorzów Wielkopolski) and S11 (from Poznań). The presence of insects in Gdańsk () indicates a significant role of the A1 motorway along the main south-north communication axis and the S7 clearway from Warsaw to Gdańsk via Olsztyn and Elbląg (). The main communication axes from Poland to the northeast to the border with Lithuania (clearway S62) made it easier for insects to reach Suwałki and Ełk () and to the border with Belarus (S8) to Bielsk Podlaski () (Figure 9).
The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place (Figure 10). ) (Figure 9). The number of C. perspectalis records reported in 2020 is extremely interesting if the number of inhabitants is considered. Comparing only two voivodeships: Silesian and Subcarpathian (No.: 14 and 16)), where the number of reported records is similar (Figure 7), after such recalculation, the number of records from Silesia is comparable to other voivodeships in southern and western Poland. Despite its small area, the Silesian voivodeship (after the Masovian voivodeship with the capital of Warsaw) has the second largest number of inhabitants. A large number of records from the Subcarpathian voivodeship (No.: 16), with a relatively small number of inhabitants, probably results from the fact that the authors of the monitoring and website come from Rzeszów, where its excellent promotion took place ( Figure 10).  Table 1.

Ostrinia nubilalis, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, Cameraria ohridella (Selected Result Issues for Comparative Purposes)
Ostrinia nubilalis. Although the species was recorded for the first time in Poland on millet (Panicum miliaceum) in the 1930s, and then in the 1950s on Zea mays, it became a severe pest of maize cultivation in Poland beginning of the 21st century. Published data show that from the 1950s to the 1990s, this pest was recorded in a limited number only in south-eastern Poland (No.: 15 and 16) and was closely related to the cultivation of maize in areas with optimal conditions for its cultivation. However, in the last two decades, the total area of maize cultivation in Poland has been systematically growing. In 2008, its cultivation area was over 730 thousand hectares, but in 2012 this area increased very quickly to over 1 million hectares [38,39]. Such a rapid increase in the area of maize sown was caused by the freezing of winter cereals and winter rape at the turn of 2011/2012, which prompted farmers to cultivate maize [40]. Since 2012, maize has been sown every year in Poland on more than one million hectares [41]. Data from the Central Statistical Office (CSO) show that maize is sown in all 16 voivodeships. There is, however, regional differentiation of maize sowing in terms of the use of the crop. In the south, grain is dominated, and in the north, silage is dominated [42]. The great interest in maize cultivation resulted in the densification of crops and the reduction of the distance between the cultivation of this plant in all provinces. The above-presented trend in the change of maize cultivation in Poland was favorable for the spread of pests of this crop.
Cameraria ohridella. Horse chestnut-Aesculus hippocastanum is a tree initially found only in park and roadside plantings as an ornamental plant. Currently, it is also found in the wild almost all over Poland (Figure 13a) [43]. The horse chestnut pest, Horse-chestnut leaf miner-C. ohridella, was first recorded in Poland in 1998 in the Botanical Garden in Wojsławice, 50 km south of Wrocław (No.: 9) near the S8 clearway from the Czech border to Wrocław and on to Warsaw [35]. A year later, a mass appearance of Horse-chestnut leaf miner was found, and trees were heavily damaged in the country's southern regions, in the vicinity of Cieszyn, Pszczyna, and Racibórz (No. : 14). These are towns located in the border zone with the Czech Republic. Therefore, another unintentional introduction from the Czech Republic using the natural south-north migration route, the Moravian Gate and the communication routes running through it from the Czech Republic (A1 motorway and S52 clearway) cannot be ruled out. . These data indicate that from the site near Wrocław, where it was found for the first time (and perhaps also from the sites described in 1999 in Silesia-No.: 14), the expansion of insects was two-way-eastwards towards Ukraine and through Central Poland to the north-east towards Belarus, and the west towards the Polish-German border (Słubice) and Pomerania (Figure 13b). The explanation for such a rapid appearance of the Horse-chestnut leaf miner in Warsaw and Masuria is possible, only taking into account the use of road transport and the main south-north communication axes, such as the A1 motorway (Cieszyn-Katowice-Warsaw and further north) and the A4 motorway running through Krakow to Rzeszów and the Polish-Ukrainian border. Fifteen years later, the same communication routes were used in their expansion by Cydalima perspectalis (Figures 7-9). In 2002 C. ohridella was already recorded nationwide in many scattered locations, confirmed by the anthropogenic dispersion pattern of this species in Poland, which is estimated on average at least 200 km per year. Currently, this species inhabits all of Poland, and its range coincides with the distribution of the common horse chestnut in Poland (Figure 13a).  Table 1.

Discussion
Such a sudden increase of knowledge in the Cydalima perspectalis range, which covered entire Poland for a few years, might be related to the fact that various media started talking about the appearance of the box tree moth due to the information campaign. For this reason, gardeners were more aware of the presence of specimens of a new pest species and were more likely to observe the boxwood plants, including detecting them more often.
Assuming that it usually takes two years from the first appearance of insects to boxwood until they are entirely defoliated, we can assume that the data sent by users of the gardening website are just such a consequence of a two-or three-year delay in detecting the pest [19,44]. Information from observers indicates that the natural expansion of this insect in Poland was a secondary factor, an example of which is the 8-year long settlement route in southern Poland in the latitudinal direction along the Carpathian arc. It should be assumed that the main factor was accidental, untargeted transfers of insects with infected plants through the use of road transport and resale of infected plants in subsequent parts of the country. An example is that in 2019 the presence of C. perspectalis was noted in Gdańsk, at a distance of over 300 km from the previous year, the closest place of the outbreak in Płock (Figures 8 and 9). It cannot be ruled out that C. perspectalis reached the Baltic coast independently by sea transport. It can also be stated that most of the new insect occurrence sites are associated with large cities. The rapid expansion in the last three years was also favored by warmer, above the long-term norms, average daily and monthly temperatures. The hot and long autumn of 2019 was the reason for the third generation of insects' mass appearance.
In Poland, the box tree moth easily survives during the winter period. In spring, as the temperature rises, the over wintering caterpillars start foraging, so the first adults appear at the beginning of April [45]. In Central Europe, the insect develops 2-3 generations a year, depending on weather conditions [17]. In 2018 in south-eastern Poland, due to the dry and hot summer, the 4th generation of this pest was likely to be developed because active moths were found in November [45]. Adults C. perspectalis can fly up to 10 km per year, then a long-range invasion of the pest (especially in Europe) is favored by bulk freight or boxwood cargo transport. Local dispersion is facilitated by, e.g., hedges, horticulture, nursery gardens, or internet sales [46].
In the last 30 years, over 30 species of insects, alien to the Polish entomofauna, has been found in Poland [28]. However, some of them were particularly spectacular and of real economic importance. These include the invasions of Ostrinia nubilalis (European corn borer), Diabrotica virgifera virgifera (Western corn rootworm), and Cameraria ohridella (Horse-chestnut leaf miner). There are many differences and similarities to that found for C. perspectalis in their pace and spread directions.
For example, in the monitoring studies carried out in the United States on D. virgifera, it was found that adult insects, under favorable conditions, move an average of several dozen kilometers per year (under the most favorable conditions, a natural dispersion of insects over a distance of over 100 km was recorded). The effect of such a pattern of spreading the Western corn rootworm was the appearance of insects only in the areas adjacent to the previously infected [47,48]. In Poland, for D. virgifera, spreading over much smaller distances was observed, up to several dozen kilometers per year. However, spreading was favored by lowland terrain and the fragmentation of field crops of maize, which, with the doubling of maize crops in 2005-2013, caused a progressive invasion of D. virgifera to the north and north-east. The only exception was the presence of D. virgifera in 2013 in Podlaskie voivodeship (No.: 8), which was undoubtedly brought to this area using transport or plant material. Studies on the spread of D. virgifera in Europe in countries such as Italy, France, Germany, Austria, and Switzerland have confirmed that the rapid spread of the species is related to the total acreage of maize cultivation in a given area. Areas that cover more than 50% of the acreage are classified as "high-risk areas" for this species' invasions [49]. These data fully corresponded to the D. virgifera dispersion pattern in Poland, which confirm the rapid invasion of the species in traditional maize cultivation areas (south-eastern Poland) and the increase in the range of occurrence with the increase in the acreage after 2008. A similar pattern of insects spread from pest-infested areas to nearby pest-free areas was observed for O. nubilalis. An additional factor contributing to the spread of this species was the abrupt increase in the acreage of maize cultivation in 2012 [41].
A completely different spreading strategy was observed for the third mentioned above invasive pest. The high rate of spread of C. ohridella and the rapid increase in its occurrence range is mainly attributed to road transport. In many cases, the favorable factors were tree stands located near the main communication routes, from which people, animals, or wind further transmitted insects to other trees. It is estimated that the distribution range of Horse-chestnut leaf miners increased in Europe at a rate of about 60 km to 114 km per year [50].
With large-scale spatial data of the occurrence of a given invasive species, several spatial models of the spread of insects to new, uninfected areas can be distinguished. These include, among other things, a diffusion model, a leptokurtic dispersal model and a stratified dispersal model [50,51]. Comparing the pace and directions of the insect's habitat mentioned above species in new areas of Poland, it should be stated that two basic ways of infesting new areas can be distinguished. The first is related to pests of arable crops, good examples of which are O. nubilalis and D. virgifera. These insects, closely related to crops, in this case, maize, take over successive areas gradually, usually over short distances (about 50 km in the direction of neighboring crops). An important factor contributing to the dispersion is the high density of the host plant crops and the short distance between them. On the other hand, the slowing down of the dispersion rate is associated with plant protection treatments and the applicable phytosanitary regulations. A diffusion model can best describe the spread of O. nubilalis and D. virgifera [50,51].
On the other hand, species of no economic importance, such as, for example, C. ohridella, take over new areas in a jump-like manner, sometimes over long distances, often hundreds of kilometers, using land transport means (including water and air transport). Five years was enough for this species to be recorded throughout Poland, both on trees growing in areas not cared for by humans and those of a decorative and recreational nature. In the analyzes of the models of the spread of this species in Germany and France, it was found that this process is best described by a leptokurtic dispersal and a stratified dispersal model. It was also found that a stratified dispersal model incorporating the effect of human population density provides the best description of the spread of C. ohridella in many countries of Europe [50,51].
The use of social networks and dedicated websites dedicated to societies and interest groups' activities is not the first time this type of approach has been used to research the distribution of insects. C. perspectalis meets most of the insect criteria suitable for this type of social monitoring. It is a species that feeds close to humans, causes specific and massive boxwood dieback symptoms, visible to everyone, even to people who are not interested in entomology. It is only necessary to consider the time insects need from the first colonization of plants to their death-about two years [19]. The lack of natural enemies enables a more precise determination of the year of insects' appearance in a given area. Previously, this type of approach was used in the British Isles where, in addition to the official operating The British and Irish network of County Moth Recorders (CMRs), which was the primary source of fully reliable records of the species, the website of the European Boxwood and Topiary Society (EBTS) provides a facility for users to report occurrences of this species and we have accessed all such data for 2018 (www.ebts.org/bmctracker) (accessed on 22 February 2021) [11]. A similar approach that reflects Citizen Science's idea has been successfully used in recent years in Toronto (Canada), where the first appearance of C. perspectalis was recorded in August 2018 [52].
Observations made by Blaik et al. [25] and Bury et al. [26] were used by EPPO to map the distribution of C. perspectalis in Europe [53]. In turn, the map of C. perspectalis distribution in Europe conducted by CABI lacks detailed information on the occurrence of the species in Poland, including its first appearance [54].
Genetic studies based on mtDNA for cytochrome oxidase genes revealed two haplotypes-HTA and HTB-in Europe out of twelve identified in Chinese populations of C. perspectalis. These results support the hypothesis of multiple introductions of this pest from eastern China to Europe. Lack of precise trade regulations for ornamental plants and trade globalization facilitated the rapid spread of the pest [4,7]. The lack of genetic research data on the population in Poland does not allow for an unambiguous statement whether the spread of C. perspectalis is the result of a single introduction to the southwest of Poland from the Czech Republic or it is multiple introductions (from the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Germany, or through the Baltic ports from Denmark or Sweden). Research of this type could provide an answer about the origin of this species in the cities of northern voivodeships (Szczecin, Gdańsk- Figure 8). It cannot be ruled out that these cities may have been infested with insects from Denmark or Sweden, where this species was first recorded in 2013 and 2016 [54].
Due to the lack of nationwide monitoring of the box tree moth's occurrence in Poland, data on the presence of the pest came only from random observations. Without the involvement of state services dealing with the monitoring of alien origin species, it was impossible to create an accurate map of the range of this species in Poland. Our observations in 2018-2020 clearly show the growing range of C. perspectalis in Poland. The obtained data indicate that the main directions of the species spread in Poland were the main communication axes of the country. A good example to justify such a thesis is the sudden appearance of several confirmed positions in the Subcarpathian Voivodeship (No.: 16) in 2016-2017. Data on the spread of this insect in Hungary and Slovakia confirm its presence in large Hungarian cities as early as 2011, and the following year it will appear in Slovakia. In 2013 and 2014, the insect was recorded in Prešov (a large communication junction in eastern Slovakia) and Košice. These localities lie on the main communication axis from Slovakia to Poland (Košice-Prešov-Rzeszów) [37,55]. On the other hand, the detected presence of C. perspectalis in Lithuania in 2018 in Vilnius is unrelated to the spread of insects along the axis of transit transport from southern Europe to the Baltic countries running through Poland [56]. C. perspectalis was recorded in the north-eastern voivodships bordering Lithuania only in 2020 in towns lying on the extension of the Warsaw-Ełk/Suwałki-Vilnius clearway. This assumption strengthens the thesis that the box three moth reaches new areas of Europe by sea transport, which may explain the earlier appearance of this species in large port towns (Szczecin, Gdańsk, Poland) in Poland as early as 2019 (Figure 8).
For C. perspectalis, an invasive pest of boxwood, a plant that grows in Poland only due to artificial plantings, a similar spreading pattern can be observed as in C. ohridella. It has been proven that the spread of this species is related to the use of land transport and the density of the human population-a stratified dispersal model. This model best explains the unintentional long-distance movement of the pest within one growing season, which may have resulted from the long-distance trade of infected plants. At the same time, an essential factor influencing the rate of spread of a species is the density of the human population, favoring local spread over short distances, locally matching the diffusion model [50,51]. Such a dispersion model is well reflected in the published maps for Switzerland, Hungary, and Slovakia, where the first recorded sites of this species begin with large cities and then along the main communication routes between them [7,11,37,55,57]. The time it took for C. perspectalis to infect all of Poland was only twice as long as that stated for C. ohridella. The years 2018-2020, in which citizen monitoring of the occurrence of the box tree moth was carried out, were crucial to the invasion of the whole of Poland.
Proposed by Nacombo et al. [5], a bioclimatic (CLIMEX ® ) model for C. perspectalis distribution in Europe, based on climate, ecological, and developmental parameters described for this species (e.g., diapause termination, thermal requirements and phenology) well reflects the directions of expansion of this pest in Poland. The places of occurrence of the box tree moth confirmed in 2020, as well as the number of raised records, correctly reflect the predictions obtained using the bioclimatic model (compare with Figure 9), pointing to the regions of south-eastern (No: 12, 14, and 16), central (No.: 5 and 10), and western (No.: 4) Poland. Similar analyses performed for the Slovak population confirm the model's usefulness [5,55]. Perhaps the model used should have been enriched, as was conducted for C. ohridella, with the human population density parameter, as it was conducted in the model to predict this invasive species for horse chestnut in a stratified dispersal model [5,50,51,55].
However, it should be noted that most of the obtained data were provided by gardeners and plant breeders, who often did not know about the appearance in Poland in the area where a new, alien species of pest lived. Some gardeners, boxwood growers, and institutions dealing with urban greenery and parks lost their boxwood bushes, topiaries, and hedges, which caterpillars utterly destroyed. Such a rapid and spectacular invasion of C. perspectalis in Poland makes it necessary to research to understand the biology of this species under Polish conditions. In this, it is essential to develop comprehensive methods of its control using biological and chemical methods, which will take into account Poland's climatic and weather conditions and the methods of growing boxwood [40,58,59].

Conclusions
The collected data indicate that the box tree moth (Cydalima perspectalis) took over its entire area from its first discovery in 2012 in Poland in 2020. Insects have spread throughout the country, often over long distances, using major communication routes. Currently, it is the greatest threat to boxwood in southern and central Poland. The lack of nationwide monitoring of C. perspectalis makes it challenging to control its spread and combat it, especially in regions where it appears the first time. The developed coverage maps, together with the data on recording the presence of C. perspectalis, allow gardeners and plant breeders to analyze the situation on an ongoing basis and undertake adequate control and eradication methods.

Supplementary Materials:
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/d14010022/s1: Table S1: The number of places where the appearance of Cydalima perspectalis was recorded and the number of reports of insects in individual voivodeships, in 2018-2020; Table S2: Detailed list of places (towns) in which the occurrence of Cydalima perspectalis was recorded and confirmed in 2018-2020.