{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009861932938856016, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.597402597402597, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparison of Unsupervised Bilingual Term Extraction Methods Using Phrase-Tables

Automatic bilingual term extraction is essential for providing a consistent bilingual term list for human translators engaged in translating a set of documents. We compare three statistical measures for extracting bilingual terms from a phrase-table built from a parallel corpus. We show that these measures extract different bilingual term candidates and a combination of these measures ranks valid bilingual terms highly.