{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02131336405529954, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005184331797235023, 'mean_word_length': 5.386029411764706, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Gap Junction-Dependent Homolog Avoidance in the Developing CNS

Oppositely directed projections of some homologous neurons in the developing CNS of the medicinal leech (Hirudo verbana), such as the AP cells, undergo a form of contact-dependent homolog avoidance. Embryonic APs extend axons within the connective nerve toward adjacent ganglia, in which they meet and form gap junctions (GJs) with the oppositely directed axons of their segmental homologs, stop growing, and are later permanently retracted (Wolszon et al., 1994a,b). However, early deletion of an AP neuron leads to resumed growth and permanent maintenance of the projections of neighboring APs. Here we test the hypothesis that a GJ-based signaling mechanism is responsible for this instance of homolog avoidance. We demonstrate that selective knockdown of GJ gene Hve–inx1 expression in single embryonic APs, by expressing a short-hairpin interfering RNA, leads to continued growth of the projections of the cell toward, into, and beyond adjacent ganglia. Moreover, the projections of the APs in adjacent ganglia also resume growth, mimicking their responses to cell deletion. Continued growth was also observed when two different INX1 mutant transgenes that abolish dye coupling between APs were expressed. These include a mutant transgene that effectively downregulates all GJ plaques that include the INX1 protein and a closed channel INX1 mutant that retains the adhesive cellular binding characteristic of INX1 GJs but not the open channel pore function. Our results add GJ intercellular communication to the list of molecular signaling mechanisms that can act as mediators of growth-inhibiting cell–cell interactions that define the topography of neuronal arbors.