{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014634146341463415, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.710280373831775, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the Extended Welch Test for Assessing Equivalence of Standardized Means

Abstract This article proposes a useful extension of the ANOVA F-test for examining mean differences for evaluating the comparability of standardized mean effects. The equivalence procedure presumably suffers from the same disadvantage as the traditional ANOVA F-statistic regarding the violations of homogeneous variance assumption. In view of the absence of vital clarification for theory development and supportive technique, this article provides a critical exposition of the extended Welch test for the equivalence of standardized means. To enhance the usefulness of equivalence testing, the theoretical properties and practical implications of the Welch-type procedure are demonstrated. Moreover, the corresponding power and sample size algorithms are described for advance planning of equivalence studies. Despite the approximate nature, the accuracy of Type I error rate, statistical power, and sample size calculations of the suggested equivalence test is justified under a wide range of model configurations. The proposed procedures are demonstrated with the data of a clinical trial regarding the comparative study of four antihypertensive treatments. A complete set of computer codes is presented to calculate the corresponding critical values, p-values, power levels, and sample sizes for data analysis and design planning of equivalence studies.