{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022598870056497175, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007263922518159807, 'mean_word_length': 6.126436781609195, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Predictors of Abusive Supervision: Organizational Identification and the Role of Individual Difference

In this study, the authors examine the relationship between organizational identification and abusive supervision. The authors predict organizational identification will be related to abusive supervision. Additionally, the authors examine the moderating effects of individual difference (gender). The sample is collected from employees who are currently employed and work under their own supervisor. Collected from 333 supervised employees (Mainland China: 150, Taiwan: 183) suggested that organizational identification was positively related to abusive supervision when organizational identification was low. However, Regardless of gender, when employees have a high degree of organizational identity, they will accommodate the behavior of the supervisor, so they won't perception of the existence of abusive supervision. The research result will help CEO to strengthen employees' organizational identification in order to reduce turnover rate; at the same time, to remind leaders to pay attention to their words and deeds and self-discipline. This will influence leaders' management performance and reduce organizational performance.