{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009640666082383873, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0026292725679228747, 'mean_word_length': 5.415730337078652, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An Informetric Assessment of Various Research Fields Interactions on Base of Categorized Papers in Dimensions

We estimated the level of interactions between all the pairs of the research groups and between all the pairs of the research divisions for 4 five-year periods on base of Dimensions data. The level of interactions is assessed by Jaccard index. Paired interaction for research divisions shows that every consecutive five-year period has decreased irregularity of its distribution of interaction. Cumulative interaction shows that all research divisions tend to have their stickiness index decreased over time. Paired interaction for research groups showed the same results but difference between two consecutive periods is greater by a larger factor. On base of interacting assessments we identified 5 research groups that have been suspiciously assigned to divisions in ANZSRC. Identified research groups have more similar research groups in concurrent divisions with statistically significant level. Those 5 research groups also have strong semantic ties with concurrent divisions, this can be an argument for adapting of ANZSRC.