{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027049180327868853, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.672131147540983, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Click: When We Knew We Were Feminists ed. by Courtney E. Martin and J. Courtney Sullivan (review)

rhetorical research. Equally valuable to new(er) researchers is the close attention to the many challenges involved in doing feminist rhetorical research well. Despite these many strengths, we—as readers who came to the text as members of a graduate feminist research course grounded in service-learning—would like to have found attention to community-based research among the conversations in this collection. This minor critique aside, Schell and Rawson’s volume proves extremely useful in generating conversation on the many (often invisible) complexities of conducting feminist inquiry. We find Schell and Rawson offering a truly generative survey of contemporary feminist rhetorical research beneficial to upper-level undergraduates, graduate students, and practicing researchers who seek first-person accounts of current feminist rhetorical research as embodied practice—that is, research in motion. Rhetorica in Motion would thus make a welcome addition to any upper-level undergraduate or graduate writing studies methods course, especially those seeking to include self-questioning, critical research narratives.