{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02456896551724138, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007758620689655172, 'mean_word_length': 5.766763848396502, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
NIMG-05. DIFFERENCES IN VASCULARITY BETWEEN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA AND BRAIN METASTASIS USING DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI


 In recent years, several automatic methods have been proposed to differentiate between brain tumor recurrence and treatment-related changes following radiotherapy, based on conventional and advanced MRI methods. Vascular parameters extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) were suggested as potential markers for disease progression. Yet, most studies that proposed machine-learning methods or relayed on threshold values of DCE for classification, did not analyze separately Glioblastoma (GBM) and brain metastasis, and often offer the same method/threshold values, neglecting the different vascularity of these two tumor types. Understanding and quantifying the differences between tumors type can improve early diagnosis of recurrence and may improve the reliability of identifying treatment-related changes. The aim of this study was to quantify vascular parameters of tumor recurrence and to assess differences between GBM and brain metastasis, specifically metastasis of breast cancer. METHOD: 41 MRI scans were included: 24 from patients with GBM: 20 with recurrence and 4 with treatment-related changes, and 17 scans from patients with brain metastasis of breast cancer: 10 with recurrence and 7 with treatment-related changes (diagnosis were based on radiological follow-up/histopathology, when available). MRIs were performed on a 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma) and included T1, T1+contrast, and DCE images. DCE analysis was performed using DUSTER and Ktrans, Vp and Kep pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between groups. RESULTS: Patients with GBM often demonstrated both tumor recurrence and areas with treatment-related changes. Significantly differences were detected between tumor recurrence and treatment-related changes, and higher Vp and Ktrans were detected in recurrent GBM as compared to recurrent breast cancer metastasis. Cutoff for differentiation between tumor recurrence and treatment-related changes will be presented specifically for each tumor type. To conclude, when defining quantitative threshold values for clinical decision-making, the inherent differences between primary and metastatic brain tumors should be taken into account.