{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020689655172413793, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01206896551724138, 'mean_word_length': 4.989690721649485, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The evolution of a vascular surgeon at a district general hospital: is sub-specialisation inevitable?

We report a 15-year retrospective audit to evaluate the change in arterial surgical commitment on general surgical case mix of a single surgeon with a vascular interest at a district general hospital. There was a 409% increase in the number of arterial procedures performed combined with a fall of 52% in the total number of operations over the study period. We conclude that, with such a rapidly growing arterial caseload, sub-specialisation to vascular surgery is inevitable.