{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05156456588805641, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03349493168796827, 'mean_word_length': 4.850515463917525, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine versus Nalbuphine and Propofol for Monitored Anaesthesia Care in Tympanoplasty: A Randomised Double-blind Study

Introduction: Tymanoplasty, a middle ear surgery, is done either under Local Anaesthesia (LA), General Anaesthesia (GA) or sedation with local anaesthesia. It is usually performed under Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) providing advantages of rapid onset, allowing hearing test intraoperatively and early mobilisation of the patient. Aim: To study the effect of nalbuphine/dexmedetomidine with nalbuphine/propofol on sedation and analgesia in tympanoplasties performed under MAC. Materials and Methods: This randomised, double-blind, clinical study was conducted from June 2020 to June 2021 in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College and MY Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India. Total 60 adult patients, of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II undergoing tympanoplasty under MAC, were randomly allocated into two groups. All patients received injection nalbuphine 50 μg/kg intravenously. Group D received a bolus dose of injection dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg i.v. over 10 min followed by an infusion at 0.3 μg/kg/h i.v. Group P received a bolus dose of injection propofol 0.75 mg/ kg followed by an infusion at 0.025 mg/kg/min i.v. Sedation and analgesia were titrated to Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 3 each. The vital parameters and need for intraoperative rescue sedation/analgesia were recorded and compared. Results: Mean RSS was significantly more in group D (3.11±0.055) than group P (2.80±0.350). Overall, VAS score was significantly less in group D (1.60±0.670) than group P (2.70±0.691). In group D, 2 (6%) patients and in group P, 4 (12%) patients required inj. midazolam. Similarly, the requirement of inj. paracetamol in group D was in 3 (10%) patients, and in Group P it was 10 (33%) patients. Bradycardia (23.3% in group D and 13.3% in group P) and hypotension (20% in group D and 13.3% in group P) were the major side-effects seen in the study. Conclusion: Nalbuphine/dexmedetomidine is superior to nalbuphine/propofol in producing sedation and decreasing VAS in patients undergoing tympanoplasty under MAC.