{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014257620452310717, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.564516129032258, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Remote sensing of boreal forest biophysical and inventory parameters: a review

The growing need to manage vegetation resources at regional and global spatial scales has led to the increased use of remote sensing technologies among forestry scientists and managers for use in their investigation and supervision of forested landscapes. With an array of extant and developing airborne and satellite sensors, as well as multiple analysis techniques, there is a need to discern the most acceptable methods with which to examine remotely sensed imagery for forest ecosystem parameters. We have reviewed the literature on the remote sensing of boreal forests in order to determine if common frameworks for monitoring and assessing change in forest biophysical and inventory parameters could be developed. Other important remote sensing techniques such as those for change detection and land cover identification were also examined. Our review examined studies documented within the scientific literature that involved the extraction of information on forest parameters with remote sensing instruments. Primarily, we focused on studies within the boreal forest, which plays an important part in the Earth-atmosphere system and contributes significantly to the global economy through forest-derived products and resources. Additionally, the boreal forest has served as the primary investigation site for many important forest remote sensing discoveries. In this review, we considered the forest parameter that was examined, the remote sensing platform used, and the calibration and validation accuracies for the study. The most effective methodology for examining each parameter, considering spatial scale, is described. In general, a fusion of multiple sensors provided the most accurate approach for parameter extraction; however, this may not be the most appropriate methodology for all studies, due to spatial and temporal considerations. In each case, we attempted to consider which methodology works the best in a variety of scenarios.