{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027604630454140695, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01068566340160285, 'mean_word_length': 5.650887573964497, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
STD clinics and the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases.

In Reply.— Unfortunately, the fields of sexuality and STD often are beset by misinterpretation and confusing semantics. Dr Cameron's and Dr Carlen's responses to our editorial apparently reflect this misunderstanding. First, we strongly agree with Dr Cameron's assessment that the increasing population at risk for sexually transmitted diseases was a major contributor to the escalating incidence of these infections. This rising sexually active population at risk is the result of both quantitative and qualitative factors—quantitatively, the postwar baby boom produced a large cohort of teenagers reaching sexual maturity during the 1960s and 1970s; qualitatively, the so-called "sexual revolution" resulted in a larger percentage of these teenagers being sexually active. In public health terms, the larger the denominator, the larger the numerator. Fortunately, it appears that both these factors are decreasing in the 1980s. Second, we also agree with Dr Cameron that "traditional morality" (namely, a stable, mutually monogamous relationship) produces