{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013725490196078431, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00392156862745098, 'mean_word_length': 5.432773109243698, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Civilities, Subjectivities and Collective Action: preliminary reflections in light of the Egyptian Revolution

These simple graffiti injunctions begin with an affirmation to Egyptians that they have ownership of their country, that it belongs to them. By virtue of this ownership they are now invested with responsibilities ranging from good maintenance of their streets to upholding certain moral and ethical principles in dealing with public institutions. The injunctions, it can be assumed, address a citizen of a country and underscore duties and obligations that follow from taking ownership and possession of that country. The assumption of these duties was enacted in the remarkable scenes of protesters removing debris from Tahrir Square each day after protests ended. Such acts of citizenship have been extended throughout Cairo’s streets, with groups of youth repairing and painting sidewalks and regulating traffic, following the withdrawal of traffic police—along with other police—from the country’s streets after the ‘Friday of Anger’ on 28 January 2011. Enactments of citizenship that follow from the claim to ownership of the country also included the organisation of the popular committees to protect not only private homes and possessions but also streets and neighbourhoods, as well as public institutions and the national wealth, as exemplified by the youth standing guard in front of the Egyptian Museum to protect it from looting. A forging of the language of citizenship took place in conjunction with these