{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03136830719307734, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017847485127095726, 'mean_word_length': 4.78125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Renal epithelial proliferation and its clinical expression in Brown Norway (BN) rats

Renal epithelial proliferation has previously been found to be a common condition in a colony of Lewis × Brown Norway (BN) F2 hybrid rats. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and clinical consequences of this condition in pure inbred BN and Lewis rats. Renal epithelial proliferation was found in 29 of 49 BN rats (59%) examined and in four of 50 Lewis rats (8%) examined. Serum creatinine and serum corticosterone was not influenced by the condition. Haematuria was more common in BN rats with (74%) than without renal papillary proliferation (35%, P < 0.05), but it may not be used to diagnose renal epithelial proliferation, as we found rats having renal epithelial proliferation without showing haematuria and rats showing haematuria without having renal epithelial proliferation. Haematuria was also common in Lewis rats (16-56% dependent of age and gender), in which renal epithelial proliferation were found in only 8%. Fluctuating asymmetry, which was used as a measure of developmental instability, was found to be increased in rats with renal epithelial proliferation (P < 0.05). Haematuria was also found to be related to the degree of fluctuating asymmetry (P < 0.01). Although the prevalence of renal epithelial proliferation is clearly higher in BN rats than in Lewis rats (P < 0.01), and although in previous reports the condition was found in F2 BN × Lewis hybrids and not in F1 BN × Lewis hybrids it cannot clearly be defined as having been caused by a single Mendelian gene, as we found it in both inbred strains. Futhermore, we found that morphologically the proliferations could be placed on the papillary as well as the medullary wall of the renal pelvis, while previously it has only been described on the papillary wall.