{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017101710171017102, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0144014401440144, 'mean_word_length': 5.1098901098901095, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An appraisal of pelvic ultrasound: a survey of gynecologists.

The clinical role and perceived usefulness of gynecologic ultrasonography (US) were determined by a survey of the 74 active members of the Eastern Ontario Obstetrical and Gynecological Society using a mailed questionnaire. There were 58 gynecologist respondents, 30 of whom had completed the specialty training before 1977 (Group I) when diagnostic US became generally available locally, and 28 whose training ended in or after 1977 (Group II). In general both groups found pelvic US to be useful and were cognizant of some of its potential benefits. Group II respondents tended to rely more upon both obstetrical and gynecological US than those in Group I, whereas Group I respondents were less familiar with some of the pitfalls or limitations of US in gynecologic practice. This suggests that the development of clinical decision-making skills by obstetric-gynecologic residents is influenced by the availability of US during their training. It may be of benefit to address the subject of relevant pitfalls in US by continuing medical education.