{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016359918200409, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.798611111111111, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Selection of pH buffers for use in conductimetric microbiological assays.

Many metabolic activities of micro-organisms lead to changes in the pH value of cultures and consequently pH buffer compounds are potentially a major source of conductivity changes in cultures. To maximize changes in conductivity associated with microbial growth the pH buffer-associated changes should occur in a direction that reinforces those due to other metabolic activities. In agreement with this, studies with Escherichia coli showed that fermentation of glucose and aerobic growth on L-alanine yielded greater changes in the conductivity of media containing Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane or L-histidine buffers than in a medium containing phosphate buffer, whereas aerobic growth on glucose or succinate yielded greater changes with phosphate buffer than with Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane or L-histidine buffers. Criteria for the selection of appropriate pH buffer compounds are presented.