{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01699029126213592, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.614973262032086, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Manuscript peer review: QA guide for advanced practice nurses

Purpose: Dissemination of scholarly findings in peer‐reviewed journals is critical for sustaining optimal evidence‐based practice standards for advanced practice nurses (APNs). However, many schools of nursing do not teach the process or significance of peer review. The purpose of this article is to describe the peer review process and provide practical suggestions for APNs reviewing a research‐based manuscript. Data sources: This article was prepared by reviewing both theoretical and data‐based literature concerning editorial peer review. Conclusions: Reviewing manuscripts requires a high level of professional expertise and commitment. This article describes the history and benefits of peer review and provides a practical overview of the peer review process. A template has also been developed to serve as a checklist for critical elements relating to peer review. Implications for practice: Peer review has a critical role in improving the quality of nursing's published knowledge base and ultimately the quality of patient care. The ability to provide sound critique of nursing manuscripts is essential to the continued development of advanced practice nursing