{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021828103683492497, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006139154160982265, 'mean_word_length': 5.668181818181818, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Improving Efficiency of Large RFID Networks Using a Clustered Method: A Comparative Analysis

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is primarily used to resolve the problems of taking care of the majority of nodes perceived and tracking tags related to the items. Utilizing contactless radio frequency identification data can be communicated distantly using electromagnetic fields. In this paper, the comparison and analysis made between the Clustered RFID with existing protocols Ad hoc On-demand Multicast Distance Vector Secure Adjacent Position Trust Verification (AOMDV_SAPTV) and Optimal Distance-Based Clustering (ODBC) protocols based on the network attributes of accuracy, vulnerability and success rate, delay and throughput while handling the huge nodes of communication. In the RFID Network, the clustering mechanism was implemented to enhance the performance of the network when scaling nodes. Multicast routing was used to handle the large number of nodes involved in the transmission of particular network communication. While scaling up the network, existing methods may be compromised with their efficiency. However, the Clustered RFID method will give better performance without compromising efficiency. Here, Clustered RFID gives 93% performance, AOMDV_SAPTV can achieve 79%, and ODBC can reach 85% of performance. Clustered RFID gives 14% better performance than AOMDV_SAPTV and 8% better performance than ODBC for handling a huge range of nodes.