{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012474012474012475, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008316008316008316, 'mean_word_length': 5.0928270042194095, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
O Tema 793 do STF e o direcionamento do cumprimento das prestações na área de saúde conforme as regras de repartição de competências estabelecidas no SUS

Objective: To overview the Item 793 of the Federal Supreme Court, which deals with the joint liability of federated entities for the duty to provide health care, and which required the magistrate to direct the fulfillment of the obligation according to the rules for the division of competences. Methodology: the the deductive method was applied to understand the various aspects inserted in the vote of the rapporteur Minister Edson Fachin on the subject of the division of competences in the Brazilian public health care system, SUS, which culminated in the Item 793 of the Federal Supreme Court. Results: this paper presents the basic rules for financing pharmaceutical assistance; providing parameters for identifying the provider of health care; it also indicates ways to reduce the costs of judicialization and points to the Federal Union as the main responsible for financing pharmaceutical assistance. Conclusion: Item 793 has not yet been able to bring a single court decision, and it is not clear about which federated entity should male part of the factual matter and be condemned in health benefits. The identification of the debtor of the benefit should be a concern of the litigants and the legal operators, including the assumption of possible penalties for non-compliance.