{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03219315895372234, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023641851106639838, 'mean_word_length': 5.08256880733945, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Neurological examination in patients undergoing sedation with propofol: a descriptive study].

INTRODUCTION
The neurological examination is a resource used in evaluating patients who are in coma. Anaesthesia can be a factor that exerts an influence on the findings. We evaluated the examination of the comatose patient in the case of patients anaesthetised with propofol in order to define its clinical value.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
A prospective study was conducted among those who had undergone heart surgery in the intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital during the months of April and May 2011. Aspects that were analysed were the examination of the anaesthetic coma, pharmacological or medical factors that can have an influence and a full neurological examination following recovery. Patients with previous neurological symptoms were excluded.


RESULTS
Thirty patients were selected (16 males and 14 females); mean age: 72 ± 10 years. All the patients were sedated with propofol. During sedation, 17 (46.7%) presented unreactive pupils. No spontaneous eye movements were observed in 100% of the sample. Ocular alterations in primary position were observed in 23.3% of them. Oculocephalic reflexes were absent in 93.3% and oculovestibular reflexes, in 100%; the corneal reflex, was absent in 70% (with asymmetry), as was the ciliospinal reflex, in 83.3%. The algesic motor response was absent in 93.3%, as were the cutaneous plantar extensor reflexes, in 20%; and 66.7% were indifferent. Following anaesthesia, the neurological examination was normal in 80%, there were slight orientation impairments in 16.7% and a hemispheric syndrome was found in one patient.


CONCLUSIONS
Anaesthesia with propofol alters the reversible cutaneous-plantar, pupillary, trunk and motor response reflexes on withdrawing sedation. The alterations may be asymmetrical. Neurological examinations should not be used in the case of patients sedated with propofol in order to make clinical decisions.