{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016706443914081145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007159904534606206, 'mean_word_length': 5.268656716417911, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of subthreshold logic with adiabatic circuit techniques

Among the reviews and discussions demonstrated in the literature, very little attention was paid to which logic style is the most for adiabatic and subthreshold techniques. This study tries to make up such a deficiency, with particular emphasis on two representative circuit structures. All the comparisons were based on 0.18-μm standard CMOS process.