{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03629536921151439, 'fraction_numerical': 0.026282853566958697, 'mean_word_length': 4.882352941176471, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[The question of equal potency of etidocaine and bupivacaine in peridural anesthesia].

A double blind clinical trial was carried out on randomised groups of 20 patients each undergoing surgery for varicose veins to compare the actions of etidocaine 1% and bupivacaine 0.5% and 0.75% with adrenaline 1:200.000. Bupivacaine 0.75% and etidocaine 1% were found to be equipotent, with a rapid onset and long duration of anaesthesia, and a comparable degree of profound motor block. The latency period of Etidocaine was markedly increased in the L V and S I segments, probably due to its high fat solubility. 0.5% bupivacaine, compared to the other preparations, showed significantly less motor block and duration of analgesia. Unlike other investigators, "spotty-analgesia" was not found in this series.