{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.057692307692307696, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04920814479638009, 'mean_word_length': 4.187683284457478, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sweat responses during inactive recovery after high-intensity running in hot, dry and humid conditions

This study investigated the relationship between high (85%) and low (19%) relative humidity (RH) and sweat rate during inactive recovery after high-intensity work in a hot environment (30 °C). Ten male subjects performed two 20-minute run trials at 68 ± 4 % of maximal oxygen consumption (VO 2max ) followed by 36 minutes of inactive recovery in standing position. Regional sweat rate (RSR) was measured on the forearm and mid-central back by technical absorbent pads, and gross sweat loss was estimated from change in body weight. Core temperature (T c ) and six skin temperatures for calculation of mean skin temperature (T s ) were measured continuously together with heart rate (HR) during running and recovery. Results show that RSR was significantly (p<0.05) higher for both arm and back during running and inactive recovery in 85% RH compared to 19% RH. The highest sweat rate was observed on the back during the last five minutes of running in 85% RH (1387 g·m -2 ·h -1 ) compared to 19% RH (886 g·m -2 ·h -1 ). Gross sweat loss (GSL) was significantly higher in 85% RH (796 ± 414 g·h -1 ) than 19% RH (489 ± 140 g·h -1 ) conditions (p=0.010). T c continued to increase for three and seven minutes post-exercise in 19% RH and 85% RH, respectively and T s was significantly higher in 85% RH than in 19% RH (p<0.05). HR was 11 bpm higher after running in 85% RH compared to 19% RH (p=0.001). In conclusion, RSR and GSL, as well as HR, T c and T s was higher during post-exercise recovery in 30°C and 85% RH than in 30°C and 19% RH. This study emphasises the importance of including the effect of relative humidity in assessment of both exercise and recovery.