{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024918743228602384, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0021668472372697724, 'mean_word_length': 5.461538461538462, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cross-corpus acoustic emotion recognition: Variances and strategies (Extended abstract)

As the recognition of emotion from speech has matured to a degree where it becomes applicable in real-life settings, it is time for a realistic view on obtainable performances. Most studies tend to overestimation in this respect: acted data is often used rather than spontaneous data, results are reported on pre-selected prototypical data, and true speaker disjunctive partitioning is still less common than simple cross-validation. A considerably more realistic impression can be gathered by inter-set evaluation: we therefore show results employing six standard databases in a cross-corpora evaluation experiment. To better cope with the observed high variances, different types of normalization are investigated. 1.8 k individual evaluations in total indicate the crucial performance inferiority of inter- to intra-corpus testing.