{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029994643813604713, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0032137118371719335, 'mean_word_length': 5.719424460431655, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Deep EEG Superresolution via Correlating Brain Structural and Functional Connectivities.

Electroencephalogram (EEG) excels in portraying rapid neural dynamics at the level of milliseconds, but its spatial resolution has often been lagging behind the increasing demands in neuroscience research or subject to limitations imposed by emerging neuroengineering scenarios, especially those centering on consumer EEG devices. Current superresolution (SR) methods generally do not suffice in the reconstruction of high-resolution (HR) EEG as it remains a grand challenge to properly handle the connection relationship amongst EEG electrodes (channels) and the intensive individuality of subjects. This study proposes a deep EEG SR framework correlating brain structural and functional connectivities (Deep-EEGSR), which consists of a compact convolutional network and an auxiliary fully connected network for filter generation (FGN). Deep-EEGSR applies graph convolution adapting to the structural connectivity amongst EEG channels when coding SR EEG. Sample-specific dynamic convolution is designed with filter parameters adjusted by FGN conforming to functional connectivity of intensive subject individuality. Overall, Deep-EEGSR operates on low-resolution (LR) EEG and reconstructs the corresponding HR acquisitions through an end-to-end SR course. The experimental results on three EEG datasets (autism spectrum disorder, emotion, and motor imagery) indicate that: 1) Deep-EEGSR significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art counterparts with normalized mean squared error (NMSE) decreased by 1% - 6% and the improvement of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) up to 1.2 dB and 2) the SR EEG manifests superiority to the LR alternative in ASD discrimination and spatial localization of typical ASD EEG characteristics, and this superiority even increases with the scale of SR.