{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014120667522464698, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.666666666666667, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An Inductive Method for Teaching Legal Reasoning and Argumentation

This article draws a distinction between the teaching of theories of legal argumentation, on the one hand, and practical legal reasoning and argumentation, on the other. While the theories of legal argumentation represent an analytical-conceptual reflection on the practice of reasoning in different contexts, legal reasoning and argumentation is a practical skill that is put into operation through the simulation of argumentative contexts. In this way, the teaching of legal reasoning and argumentation can be developed more effectively from an inductive methodology, in which from the simulation of realistic contexts of argumentation, guidelines are extracted for a better approach and defense of arguments.