{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02616726526423807, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02616726526423807, 'mean_word_length': 5.678082191780822, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
QM/MM Investigation of Substrate and Product Specificities of Suv4-20h2: How Does This Enzyme Generate Dimethylated H4K20 from Monomethylated Substrate?

Protein lysine methyltransferases (PKMTs) catalyze the methylation of lysine residues on histone proteins in the regulation of chromatin structure and gene expression. In contrast to many other PKMTs for which unmodified lysine is the methylation target, the enzymes in the Suv4-20 family are able to generate dimethylated product (H4K20me2) based exclusively on the monomethylated H4K20 substrate (H4K20me1). The origin of such substrate/product specificity is still not clear. Here, molecular dynamics (MD) and free energy (potential of mean force) simulations are undertaken using quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) potentials to understand the substrate/product specificities of Suv4-20h2, a member of the Suv4-20 family. The free energy barriers for mono-, di-, and trimethylation in Suv4-20h2 obtained from the simulations are found to be well correlated with the specificities observed experimentally with the allowed dimethylation based on the H4K20me1 substrate and prohibited monomethylation and trimethylation based on H4K20 and H4K20me2, respectively. It is demonstrated that the reason for the relatively efficient dimethylation is an effective transition state (TS) stabilization through strengthening the CH···O interactions as well as the presence of a cation-π interaction at the transition state. The simulations also show that the failures of Suv4-20h2 to catalyze monomethylation and trimethylation are due, respectively, to a less effective TS stabilization and inability of the reactant complex containing H4K20me2 to adopt a reactive (near attack) configuration for methyl transfer. The results suggest that care must be exercised in the prediction of the substrate specificity based only on the existence of near attack configurations in substrate complexes.