{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02028639618138425, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002386634844868735, 'mean_word_length': 5.877049180327869, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Rate-responsive pacing in patients with left ventricular failure.

Aerobic and hemodynamic performance, at rest and during exercise, has been explored in patients with either atrial synchronous ventricular or respiratory-dependent ventricular pacing. In patients with chronic AV block and normal left ventricle, the cardiac output, VO2 at maximal exercise, and work tolerance increased significantly with rate-responsive pacing in comparison with fixed ventricular pacing. Chronic AV block and left ventricle dysfunction in patients with respiratory-dependent ventricular pacing improved maximal cardiac output, VO2 anaerobic threshold, and physical work capacity. The benefit of rate-responsive pacing was found to be significantly greater in patients with left ventricle dysfunction than in patients with normal left ventricle function.