{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018162393162393164, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003205128205128205, 'mean_word_length': 4.930379746835443, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Nathan Hitchcock, Karl Barth and the Resurrection of the Flesh: The Loss of the Body in Participatory Eschatology

1. Although he did not live to write the doctrine of redemption with which the Church Dogmatics was to conclude, Barth had a well-developed understanding of the ultimate destiny of human creatures, and a coherent account of Barth’s distinctive vision of the last things can be gleaned from his published work. 2. In marked contrast to some prevailing tendencies in modern Protestant theology, Barth affirmed the resurrection of the flesh – of human persons in their irreducible and enduring corporeality. 3. And yet Barth’s commitment to a noetic and participationist idiom – resurrection as the revelation of our eternal life in Christ – renders him incapable of doing full justice to the scriptural vision of resurrection as the inauguration of the saints into an everlasting fellowship with Christ and with each other.