{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014124293785310734, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0009416195856873823, 'mean_word_length': 5.403614457831325, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
5. ‘Demystifying’ Multilingual Fieldwork: On the Importance of Documenting and Reflecting on Language Learning in Ethnographic Research

Drawing on my experiences of conducting ethnographic research in France and Bulgaria, I argue in this chapter that documenting and reflecting on language learning has a crucial part to play in breaking the silence that often still surrounds how researchers learn and use different languages for fieldwork. I begin by highlighting the fact that my PhD thesis was effectively ‘silent’ about such questions, before describing how in recent research in Bulgaria I attempted to document and analyse my language learning practices much more systematically. I then compare the approaches to language learning I adopted for these two studies, showing how my language learning practices in relation to Bulgarian were informed by what I had learned from reflecting on my experience of using French for my PhD work. Finally, I suggest that ‘demystifying’ multilingual fieldwork also requires an open discussion with the bodies that fund