{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011791128579449747, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0005614823133071309, 'mean_word_length': 5.341637010676156, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Trans-Dimensional Monte Carlo Inversion of Short Period Magnetotelluric Data for Cover Thickness Estimation

We have developed an algorithm and released open-source code for the 1D inversion of magnetotelluric data. The algorithm uses trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques to solve for a probabilistic conductivity-depth model. The inversion of each station employs multiple Markov Chains in parallel to generate an ensemble of millions of conductivity models that adequately fit the data given the assigned noise levels. The trans-dimensional aspect of the inversion means that the number of layers in the conductivity model is solved for rather than being predetermined and kept fixed. Each Markov chain increases and decrease the number of layers in the model and the depths of the interfaces as it samples. Once the ensemble of models is generated, its statistics are analysed to assess the posterior probability distribution of the conductivity at any particular depth, as well as the number of layers and the depths of the interfaces. This stochastic approach gives a thorough exploration of model space and a more robust estimation of uncertainty than deterministic methods allow. The method’s application to cover thickness estimation is discussed with synthetic and real examples. Inversion of complex impedance tensor and also derived apparent resistivity/phase data are both demonstrated. It is found that the more pronounced layer boundaries allow more straightforward interpretation of cover thickness than that from deterministic smooth model inversions. It is concluded that thickness estimates compare favourably with borehole stratigraphic logs in most cases, and that the method is a useful addition to a range of cover thickness estimation tools.