{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02264808362369338, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0078397212543554, 'mean_word_length': 5.383333333333334, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: David S. Robinson, Christ and Revelatory Community in Bonhoeffer’s Reception of Hegel

the West’ (pp. 6–7). Based on the fact that, in Britain, Scripture and theology motivated the founders of the Royal Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Animals in 1824 and were prominent in the Society’s self-understanding through the whole nineteenth century, I would suggest that this deficit is more like 200 years. Orthodoxy grounds its theology in the teaching of the earliest Christian councils and in patristic sources, remains highly clericalised due to leadership by a monastic episcopate, and has through the twentieth century suffered from Marxist political subjection in several countries. These factors impair its engagement with modern animal welfare science and its potential contribution to secular legislative programmes that might promote welfare. Nellist passionately hopes that her study will put animal welfare on the agenda of the Orthodox Churches. I also hope that it circulates widely amongst Orthodox bishops, clergy, seminarians and laity, especially any engaged in public policy formation, advancing that objective.