{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03304178814382896, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0009718172983479105, 'mean_word_length': 5.167664670658683, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
NUCLEUS AND SATELLITE IN NOMINAL SYNTAGMATICS

A subordinative construction is one with a nucleus and (a) satellite(s). This kind of analysis is mostly limited to traditional 'syntax*, i.e., to relations between 'words', not within them; thus derivatives were only very recently included. Nor is it customary to apply this analysis to the construction article 4noun. Yet the latter constructions have sometimes been described as subordinative, with contradicting results. The accepted criterion for a nucleus — the ability to stand alone — is inapplicable to 'morphological units' or other closed units (bilateral dependences); attempts to apply it indirectly were only partly successful. This paper proposes a new, though related, criterion: the nucleus is the part which is responsible for the appurtenance of the construction to a given substitution-class. We thus can show that most nominal derivational suffixes are nuclei of their words, and that the article must in several languages be considered the nucleus of its noun.