{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018404907975460124, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00245398773006135, 'mean_word_length': 5.425196850393701, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Syntax of Postpositions in Uto-Aztecan

0. The reconstruction of postpositional expressions in Uto-Aztecan involves two distinct but interrelated endeavors: reconstructing the postpositions themselves, and determining the syntactic constructions in which these elements functioned in the class rather than with the form and meaning of individual members of the class. As will become apparent, an appreciation of the syntax of postpositions in its broad outlines will greatly facilitate their reconstruction, since the form of postpositions, in UtoAztecan at least, has been influenced in various ways by the syntactic constructions in which they occur. I will largely confine my attention to fifteen of the better-known Uto-Aztecan languages. These are listed in table 1, together with their abbreviations and a