{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028284671532846715, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021897810218978103, 'mean_word_length': 4.92972972972973, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reverse frequency-sweep audiometry in patients with retrocochlear and cochlear deafness.

The material consisted of 21 patients with surgically confirmed eighth-nerve tumour and 107 patients with cochlear deafness. 13 (62%) of the patients with eighth-nerve tumour showed separated forward-backward tracings in sweep-frequency audiometry. One of the 13 patients gave an initially normal result but after the test ear had been exposed to 80 dB HL white noise for 3 min, the curves separated. Only 2 (1.9%) of the 107 patients with cochlear deafness had separated curves. Tone decay test revealed a pathological result in 67% of the patients with eighth-nerve tumour and in 26% of the cases with cochlear hearing loss. There is no single pathognomonic test for the diagnosis of retrocochlear and cochlear deafness. Diagnosis must be based on a whole battery of several tests, and among these, reverse frequency-sweep audiometry seems to be a suitable additional adaptation test. If an abnormal result is found in forward-backward sweep-frequency audiometry, a retrocochlear lesion is very probable.