{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04118268215417107, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01900739176346357, 'mean_word_length': 4.780487804878049, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Serum prolactin levels in undernourished Indian lactating women

1. Serum prolactin (PRL) levels, both basal and post-suckling peak, were estimated in fifty-seven lactating women. 2. Basal PRL levels were significantly higher in all lactating women irrespective of the duration of lactation as compared to the levels in non-pregnant, non-lactating women. 3. There was a significant positive correlation (r 0·69, P < 0·001) between the basal PRL levels and the post-suckling peak values. 4. After 8 months of lactation, peak post-suckling, PRL levels were not significantly different from basal values. 5. Basal PRL levels were significantly lower (P < 0·05) in mothers whose infants were being supplemented. 6. PRL levels were not related to the mother's nutritional status as determined by body-weight. 7. The findings suggest that high PRL levels during lactation prolong the duration of lactional amenorrhoea and hence the relative infertility.