{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.040289256198347105, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008264462809917356, 'mean_word_length': 4.9447852760736195, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Reading and Pronunciation of the Sumerian Word for "Monkey"

The first attempt to determine the correct reading and pronunciation of the Sumerian word for "monkey" was made by Falkenstein. He suggested that the standard writings U+KA.KU-bi and U+KA.DUL-bi should be read ugu-duls-bi and ugu-dul-bi respectively, assuming that the underlying pronunciation of this word was ugudulbi.2 Because of the late orthography U+KA.DUL-bi, whose middle grapheme is commonly read as dul, some scholars still adhere to the readings suggested by Falkenstein.3 However, already in 1962 E. Gordon called attention to one of the Akkadian words for "monkey," uqilpu, and came to the conclusionthat the latter is etymologically related to the corresponding Sumerian word.4 Accordingly he suggested for the Old Babylonian U+KA.KU-bi the reading ugu ugu4-bi, assuming an underlying pronunciation ugubi. As for the problematic DUL sign, present in the late, first millennium, spelling of