{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021239914488655955, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009930349631059926, 'mean_word_length': 5.476998660116124, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 5, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Integrating Typhoid Fever Within the Sustainable Development Goals: Pragmatism or Utopia?

Abstract Several decades following the first estimates of the global burden of typhoidal salmonellosis (infections caused by Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi), this disorder remains a major cause of morbidity worldwide with an estimated 17 million cases annually. The risk factors for typhoid include poverty, poor living conditions with unsafe water and lack of adequate sanitation, and unsafe foods—all reasons for the disease burden being highest among such populations including urban slums. A recent review of typhoid trends globally and in specific countries suggests that the relative contributions of these risk factors to disease burden reduction as well as persistence have varied. There is also the risk of periodic outbreaks related to introduction of relatively virulent drug-resistant strains or movements of vulnerable populations, including those in conflict zones. Most countries of the world are now aligning their health and multisectoral strategies to address the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets, which were agreed upon by all countries of the world in September 2015. Though neglected so far, there are huge opportunities for mainstreaming typhoid prevention and control strategies within the SDGs. This article reviews some of the approaches that may help elevate typhoid to a higher level of awareness in public health programs and policy and to ensure that investments in major public health preventive measures are made part of the universal health coverage agenda.

Several decades following the first estimates of the global burden of typhoidal salmonellosis (infections caused by Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi), this disorder remains a major cause of morbidity worldwide with an estimated 17 million cases annually. The risk factors for typhoid include poverty, poor living conditions with unsafe water and lack of adequate sanitation, and unsafe foods-all reasons for the disease burden being highest among such populations including urban slums. A recent review of typhoid trends globally and in specific countries suggests that the relative contributions of these risk factors to disease burden reduction as well as persistence have varied. There is also the risk of periodic outbreaks related to introduction of relatively virulent drug-resistant strains or movements of vulnerable populations, including those in conflict zones. Most countries of the world are now aligning their health and multisectoral strategies to address the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets, which were agreed upon by all countries of the world in September 2015. Though neglected so far, there are huge opportunities for mainstreaming typhoid prevention and control strategies within the SDGs. This article reviews some of the approaches that may help elevate typhoid to a higher level of awareness in public health programs and policy and to ensure that investments in major public health preventive measures are made part of the universal health coverage agenda.
Although exact numbers are difficult to estimate in the absence of robust surveillance systems, an estimated 17 million cases of typhoid and paratyphoid fever illnesses (typhoidal salmonellosis, hereafter called typhoid for simplicity) occurred globally in 2015 [1] mostly in South Asia, Southeast Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa, with the largest burden estimated in South Asia [2]. More data regarding the incidence of typhoid fever in Africa has been generated in recent years including the recently published Typhoid Fever Surveillance in Africa Program supplement, although additional challenges to estimating the incidence of typhoid fever accurately remain prominent [3,4]. Despite available antibiotic therapy, both typhoid and paratyphoid fever can lead to serious illnesses with an estimated 178 000 deaths globally in 2015 [1,5]. With emergence of antibiotic resistance, the morbidity and severity of illness may be higher in drug-resistant cases of typhoid and has been noted to be a major cause of concern, and an important consideration behind the recent SAGE recommendation for introduction of typhoid conjugate vaccination in endemic countries [5]. While the introduction of typhoid conjugate vaccines and the willingness of global support mechanisms through the Gavi funding mechanisms are important strategies, typhoid control merits a wider strategy as an important adjunct to prevention strategies. A recent review of implementation of known typhoid fever preventive strategies in 8 target countries revealed major gaps and variability in coverage, with opportunities for scaling up [6].

RISK FACTORS AND DETERMINANTS OF TYPHOID
Typhoid was a virtually invisible disease during the period of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) from 2000 to 2015, a period that saw much global action around maternal and child health [7]. There were several reasons for this, including a major focus on maternal and child mortality and a rather limited attention to the social determinants of health. Much of this has changed with the opportunity provided by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which were approved in 2015 after an extensive process of stakeholder and country consultation [8]. The SDGs encompass many goals that relate to environment, risk factors, and underlying determinants of disease; several of these are particularly germane to typhoid. Table 1 summarizes some of the known risk factors for typhoid fever outbreaks from recent studies assessing such risks [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], including elements related to socioeconomic deprivation, poor water and sanitation, and food safety. Additionally, health services and system matter a great deal, both in terms of access to appropriate diagnostic and curative services as well as the vaccination strategies. This is especially notable with the continued uncertainty around the burden and severity of typhoid, even though cases of typhoid complications such as perforations still abound [22].

DO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS OFFER AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ADDRESSING TYPHOID AT SCALE?
The SDGs are the blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all. They address most of the global challenges we face, including those related to poverty, inequality, climate, environmental degradation, prosperity, and peace and justice. The Goals are interconnected and differ from the previous MDGs in that they are wide ranging and relate to global priorities for the next generation. There is also an explicit focus on reducing inequalities and reaching marginalized populations. While the 17 SDGs, 230 individual indicators, and 169 associated targets may seem impossibly wide-ranging and aspirational, they are interrelated and overall progress focuses on multisectoral approaches [23]. Health is allocated just one goal on its own (Goal 3, to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages), but many of the other SDGs relate to the social determinants of health and are interconnected [24]. There are ample reasons for addressing the prevention and management strategies for typhoid as part of a global action plan or package for countries with residual burden or high-risk burden of disease. These include many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) with populations at risk, frequently among urban slums and displaced populations. In other cases, including high-income settings, typhoid may relate to travel to endemic areas and imported cases through visitors or migrant workers. Factors such as crowding, poor sanitation, and unsafe agricultural or food production processes also contribute to typhoid burden and transmission risks. Therefore, measures to interrupt transmission through improvements in sanitation and food production need to be included in comprehensive prevention strategies for enteric fever.
Many of the SDGs and related indicators directly and indirectly relate to typhoid prevention, control, and management. Table 2 summarizes the relevant SDGs, relevant indicators, and elements related to typhoid. These risks are compounded by poor diagnostic facilities and quality of care within health systems, leading to delay in the institution of appropriate therapy. In those LMICs where disease burden remains high, strategies to interrupt typhoid transmission must target health systems in an attempt to improve on typhoid prevention and treatment. The emergence of drug-resistant strains of typhoid has posed additional challenges in the management and containment of disease [25,26].
An analysis of typhoid and paratyphoid fever management in India found that the average cost per case treated was approximately US$53, which is potentially unaffordable in many high-burden regions [27]. Courses of second-and third-line antibiotic therapy for newer quinolone and now cephalosporin-resistant strains of typhoid are even more expensive and frequently not available within the public sector. In the absence of safety nets for typhoid prevention and management, one can envision that a single case of multidrug-resistant typhoid could be a catastrophic illness pushing some over the poverty line. With the focus on universal health coverage within the SDG 3 for health, a major challenge will be provision of services for those presenting with undiagnosed febrile illnesses (including dengue, typhoid, malaria, and chikungunya), where rapid diagnostics understandably hold the key for appropriate triage and therapy [28].     A major problem in global typhoid monitoring and control is lack of adequate data and information on burden and trends. That is probably one of the reasons as to why the disorder was virtually orphaned between various departments at the World Health Organization. Despite the fact that the bulk of the disease is in the pediatric population, this was never a priority within the Child and Adolescent Health Department and was not included among the IMCI regimen dealing with febrile illnesses. Typhoid was not accorded the category of a neglected tropical disease either, and was relegated to the Vaccines and  Biologicals program for development of global guidance, which led to a position paper in 2003 [29], which has only just been updated as a position paper on typhoid vaccines [30]. Although better information is now available from special studies and research programs, a review of the global burden by Crump et al showed that from 1954 to 2000, only 13 countries had population-based surveillance data for typhoid, and only 2 countries within Africa (Egypt and South Africa) had surveillance data from the control arms of vaccination trials [31]. To effectively allocate resources for complex interventions, it is essential to have accurate knowledge about local disease burden, risk factors, and locally appropriate control measures. A case can thus be made for developing and implementing robust surveillance systems for typhoid.

A FRESH HOPE FOR PREVENTION
Typhoid progress has for long been hampered by the lack of an effective vaccine, especially among the under-5 population. The existing Vi polysaccharide vaccine, even though effective in older children and adults, has waning immunity after a few years and an overall protective efficacy of 69% (95% confidence interval, 63%-74%) [32]. It is also in this context that the introduction of the new typhoid conjugate vaccine, with enhanced efficacy against typhoid among young children, offers an extremely important adjunct to existing tools for the prevention of typhoid and potentially averting the emergence of super-resistant strains of typhoid [33]. The vaccination strategies offer opportunities for enhancing protective population immunity for those at risk through targeted vaccination campaigns and potential integration of typhoid vaccines into childhood immunization schedules.

CONCLUSIONS
Countries need to invest in a comprehensive strategy for typhoid control that addresses key determinants and risk factors for the disease. In many developing countries, significant parts of the population reside in places where a substantial proportion of the population lacks access to improved drinking water and sanitation, and live in congested slums with conditions favorable for the transmission of typhoid fever and other enteric pathogens. It is recognized that improvements in water supply and sanitation infrastructure, as well as food safety legislation, effected dramatic reductions in typhoid incidence in most of Europe and the United States [22], with the residual disease burden largely related to travelers returning from countries where typhoid fever remains endemic. In addition, a focus must be placed on individual behaviors and water, sanitation, and hygiene infrastructure. These risk factors are compounded by poor regulatory environments and poor food safety with potential access to contaminated foods. These factors contribute to relatively excess risks of typhoid and high burden of disease among young children and adolescents [34]. Given differing risks of transmission and force of infection, despite marked reductions in diarrheal disease burdens, many countries in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa still continue to have a significant burden of typhoid. Urgent action is needed in the context of integrating typhoid within the SDGs. It is important to underscore that, while typhoid remains a global public health challenge, it has not, as yet, risen to a level of priority needing concerted action (and financing), and the SDGs offer a unique opportunity to address this. This requires a multipronged strategy to raise awareness at the national, regional, and global levels on the importance of typhoid as a preventable disease. This includes continued investments in reducing risks associated with poverty, poor living conditions, and poor sanitation; continued investments in safe water and foods; initiatives to improve access, rapid diagnosis, and care; and targeted immunization strategies within health systems [35]. The recent spread of antimicrobial resistance and global support for initiatives to mitigate such risks offer a huge opportunity for rationalizing diagnosis and treatment and preventive approaches. This would mean including typhoid-related estimates and outcomes among the universal health coverage-related strategies and monitoring that countries are drawing up presently.