{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03859060402684564, 'fraction_numerical': 0.030201342281879196, 'mean_word_length': 4.852941176470588, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Editor Bias on Climate Change?

Science's Editor-In-Chief Donald Kennedy uses his Editorials inappropriately to advocate politically derived goals--undermining the proper role of Science and endangering credibility with the public. In "An unfortunate U-turn on carbon" (Editorial, 30 March 2001, p. 2515), he accused President George Bush of reversing his position on the Kyoto Protocol. There was no such reversal: Bush had made it quite clear during his 2000 campaign that he opposed the Protocol -echoing the U.S. Senate, which had unanimously rejected such restrictions on energy use in 1997.