{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013777267508610792, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002296211251435132, 'mean_word_length': 4.8133333333333335, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Limits to European Harmonisation of Criminal Law

The harmonisation of criminal law and criminal procedure in the EU is subject to specific conditions, which differ from those 
generally applicable to the approximation of laws in the Union. Specific limits may result from the rules of competence set 
out in Art. 82 et seq. TFEU, from EU fundamental rights, or from constitutional conditions applicable in certain Member States. 
These factors can impede the negative approximation of national criminal law systems through mutual recognition as well as 
the positive approximation through EU secondary law. Furthermore, if serious doubts arise as to whether the rule of law is fully 
respected by Member States participating in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, the premise for any form of judicial 
cooperation in criminal matters in the EU is no longer valid.