{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03598971722365039, 'fraction_numerical': 0.028277634961439587, 'mean_word_length': 4.810945273631841, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of methods of performing the radioallergosorbent test: Phadebas, Fadal-Nalebuff and Hoffman protocols.

A series of control, IgE myeloma containing and atopic sera were tested by the radioallergosorbent test using identical lots of commercially available reagents following three different RAST protocols: Phadebas, Fadal-Nalebuff and that used in our own laboratories. In addition, a new RAST tracer was evaluated in the Phadebas and Fadal-Nalebuff methods. The Phadebas technique, using the standard 0.35 PRU cut-off, was the least sensitive at 68% but its sensitivity was raised to 84% using an 0.14 PRU cut-off. The specificity was 100% at 0.35 and 95% at 0.14 PRU. Our laboratory's technique gave a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 100%. The Fadal-Nalebuff method had the highest sensitivity at 92% but the lowest specificity at 92%. The Fadal-Nalebuff technique leads to a significant number of false positive scores, particularly in sera with IgE > 500 U/ml or with RAST discs that have significant non-specific binding. The Fadal-Nalebuff method can be used reliably if modified to include suitable negative controls for each antigen tested.