{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015810276679841896, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.333333333333333, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On linguistic-philosophical nature of socio-ethical vocabulary

The article discusses current issues related to the linguistic and philosophical nature of socio-ethical vocabulary in terms of diachrony. Based on the analysis of a large amount of historical and philosophical material, the author presents his interpretation of the stages of the formation and formation of the vocabulary of ethics as an integral part of the general philosophical vocabulary, since the problems of ethics as a science and form of social life were undoubtedly considered at all stages of human civilization. However, each time and in each country, the interpretation of ethical concepts and norms, and therefore terms, was of a concrete historical and purely national character.