{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0196078431372549, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.492063492063492, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Exemplarism and Judicial Virtue

Abstract This paper argues that exemplary judges, that is, paradigmatically good judges, are vitally important both to inculcating the judicial virtues and to developing a theory of judicial virtue. Critically, such exemplars are not only real but also fictional. Thus, literature is central to both improving the judicial practice and theorizing about excellence in judging.