{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026172300981461286, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017448200654307525, 'mean_word_length': 5.12, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Nomothetic View of Personal Construct Processes

Although Kelly ( 1955) stressed the importance of both idiographic and nomothetic approaches to personal construct theory, most research in construct theory has only addressed the constructs of the individual. In the present study a nomothetic view of construction was developed by correlating measures of construction processes across many subjects instead of only exploring these processes in an individual. College students ( N = 320) completed a Personal Construct Inventory developed from Kelly's unique definitions of anxiety, guilt, threat, looseness, hostility, and preemption. A cross-validation 7 of .84 and 6-wk. test-retest rs of .60 to .89 for the scales are given in a detailed supplementary report. Table 1 includes the Pearson correlations among scores on the six scales of the inventory. The results suggest construct processes can covary in rypical