{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029495718363463368, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022835394862036156, 'mean_word_length': 4.717391304347826, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accuracy of basic cancer patient data: results from an extensive recoding survey.

The accuracy of data coded from the medical records of 985 patients from 22 major U.S. cancer centers was checked by recoding during 1978-81. The 29 items covered demographics, diagnosis, and therapy. Original codes were compared to recodes, and disagreements were classified as major or minor. The highest rate of major disagreements, 23%, was for stage of disease, followed by 10% for histology and 7% for site. Major disagreement rates for most other items were under 7%. Only 3% of a large sample of major disagreements involved justifiable differences in interpretation; the others were due to errors in the use of records. Major disagreement rates varied by a factor of 10 across sites, 4 across centers, and 2 across stage of disease. For several items the code "unknown" was overused and led to disagreements. A new procedure is presented for analysis of disagreement rates. The results from this procedure can guide training effort to improve coding accuracy.