{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020795660036166366, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.33112582781457, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Use of Interactive Computed Tomography to Predict the Esthetic and Functional Demands of Implant‐Supported Prostheses

Diagnosis, treatment planning, and prediction of a final implant-supported prosthetic design require precise noninvasive presurgical information. In addition, coordination of implant team member services and predetermination of treatment fees are critical to a successful resolution of patient needs and concerns. By combining the use of a clinically verified barium-coated template and interactive computed tomography, the implant team can determine and address the relevant issues affecting treatment outcomes. These issues include: fixture/prosthesis incompatibility; recognition of anatomic limitations and anomalies; the need for presurgical bone augmentation; fixture diameter and distribution; abutment type and angle; bone density; soft-tissue augmentation requirements; accurate fee determination; and medicolegal protection. The data collection methodology and format for the Mecall and Rosenfeld prosthesis prediction analysis are discussed as part of a case presentation.