{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022813688212927757, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.057471264367816, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Causality, Objectivity and Freedom : Weber, Kant and the Neo-Kantians

A great man not only condemns those who come after him to interpret him, as Hegel asserted-he also puts them under the obligation to construct his intellectual genealogy. In Weber’s case this has thus far not been an altogether successful enterprise, mainly because those who are sufficiently interested in Weber to undertake it are often not fully conversant with the numerous fields of learning, outside sociology, from which Weber drew his inspiration.