{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016897081413210446, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006144393241167435, 'mean_word_length': 5.35609756097561, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Smoking and cotton dust effects in cotton textile workers.

Cotton textile workers have an increased prevalence of both obstructive and restrictive lung function patterns compared with control subjects. Similar abnormal patterns may occur with respiratory diseases of other etiologies, notably those associated with cigarette smoking. The shape of the maximum expiratory flow volume (MEFV) curve has been used to characterize patterns of lung function abnormality. To better evaluate the respiratory effects of cotton dust exposure and to contrast them with those of cigarette smoking, we defined a new functional parameter (angle beta) related to the shape of the MEFV curve. We compared 477 cotton textile workers, both current smokers and never smokers, 45 years and older, with 932 similarly aged control subjects from three communities. Smokers, regardless of their occupational exposure or sex, have smaller beta values than nonsmokers. Cotton textile workers, despite a greater prevalence of abnormal lung function, have beta values that do not differ from those of persons without occupational exposure to cotton dust. We suggest that morphologic patterns of flow volume curves reflect separate effects of cotton dust exposure and smoking and may be related to different sites of airway injury.