{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032640949554896145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.553398058252427, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Technics, Time and Stiegler's ‘Orthographic Moment’

This paper addresses Bernard Stiegler’s concept of ‘orthographic moment’, especially with regard to the philosopher’s commentary on Roland Barthes’s essay on photography, Husserl’s melody as a temporal object and Gilles Deleuze’s notion of the time-image. The implications of Stiegler’s work, however, go beyond the immediate relation of technics to the image or to music, and include the way that perception itself becomes a technically inflected domain. In this regard, Stiegler is amongst a number of researchers who have pushed back the boundaries in our understanding of the relation between technics and perception.