{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.031413612565445025, 'fraction_numerical': 0.024214659685863876, 'mean_word_length': 5.266393442622951, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 3, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Strut tissue coverage and endothelial cell coverage: a comparison between bare metal stent platforms and platinum chromium stents with and without everolimus-eluting coating.

AIMS
In a rabbit denudation model, assess impact of strut thickness on arterial healing by comparing endothelial cell coverage and strut tissue coverage after implantation of bare metal stents of varying thickness; evaluate the effect of an everolimus-eluting stent.


METHODS AND RESULTS
Strut tissue coverage and endothelialisation were assessed 14 and 21 days after implantation with scanning electron microscopy quantitation methods and immunostaining against the endothelial cell marker PECAM-1 (CD-31). At 14 days, strut tissue coverage was higher with the stainless steel Liberté stent (88%, 97 µm) versus Express (77%, 132 µm). The platinum chromium Element stent with the thinnest strut (81 µm) had the highest level (95%). By 21 days endothelialisation was complete for all. The everolimus-eluting Element stent had a 1-week delay in luminal endothelialisation but was >89% by 21 days; strut endothelial coverage was >79% in 80% (4/5) of animals, with total strut tissue coverage >95%.


CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated that strut thickness affects strut tissue coverage post stent implantation and the addition of an everolimus-eluting polymer introduces a short delay in endothelialisation. The results highlight the need to control for aspects of stent design such as strut thickness when comparing across drug-eluting stent platforms.