{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01366120218579235, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0034153005464480873, 'mean_word_length': 5.15546218487395, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A search method for homologs of small proteins. Ubiquitin-like proteins in prokaryotic cells?

The question of protein homology versus analogy arises when proteins share a common function or a common structural fold without any statistically significant amino acid sequence similarity. Even though two or more proteins do not have similar sequences but share a common fold and the same or closely related function, they are assumed to be homologs, descendant from a common ancestor. The problem of homolog identification is compounded in the case of proteins of 100 or less amino acids. This is due to a limited number of basic single domain folds and to a likelihood of identifying by chance sequence similarity. The latter arises from two conditions: first, any search of the currently very large protein database is likely to identify short regions of chance match; secondly, a direct sequence comparison among a small set of short proteins sharing a similar fold can detect many similar patterns of hydrophobicity even if proteins do not descend from a common ancestor. In an effort to identify distant homologs of the many ubiquitin proteins, we have developed a combined structure and sequence similarity approach that attempts to overcome the above limitations of homolog identification. This approach results in the identification of 90 probable ubiquitin-related proteins, including examples from the two prokaryotic domains of life, Archaea and Bacteria.