{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021120293847566574, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012855831037649219, 'mean_word_length': 5.089385474860335, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Creating and testing the effectiveness of hypothetical scenarios which elicit anger and hurt in romantic relational contexts

Researchers interested in emotions and romantic relationships have long been
 struggling to find efficient and reliable emotion elicitation techniques. In
 this article, we present the work of creating and testing the effectiveness
 of hypothetical scenarios that elicit anger and hurt in romantic relational
 contexts. In study one, two hypothetical scenarios for each emotion were
 created using the most frequent categories of recalled affective events.
 Further on, we tested their effectiveness in eliciting anger or hurt in
 three different phases. In study two, 337 participants, aged between 18 and
 40 (M = 19.93; SD = 3.17), read the scenarios and rated them according to
 several criteria such as arousal, discreteness, positive and negative
 induced affectivity. We found that our hypothetical scenarios were effective
 on discreteness, arousal, and positive and negative affect for eliciting
 anger and hurt in the contexts of romantic relationships.