{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04012112036336109, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03028009084027252, 'mean_word_length': 4.875555555555556, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Car-seat occupancy detection using a monocular 360° NIR camera and advanced template matching

The integration of seat occupancy detection systems is one of the most recent developments in automobile production. These systems prevent the deployment of airbags at unoccupied seats, thus avoiding the considerable cost imposed by the replacement of airbags. Seat-occupancy detection system can also be used to improve passenger comfort, e.g. by an occupation-dependent control of air-conditioning systems. This paper describes an inexpensive and versatile optical seat-occupancy detection system. Different approaches to pattern matching and the impact of local normalization, edge detection, multi-algorithm and temporal matching-score fusion are evaluated for each individual seat using a test set of 53,928 frames further classified in uniform and non-uniform illumination conditions. The results of these tests yield Equal Error Rates for uniform/non-uniform illumination of as low as 3.05%/1.68% for the front left seat, 2.17%/0.69% for the front right seat, 5.86%/4.01% for the rear left seat, 10.99%/11.07% for the rear center seat and 5.63%/1.84% for the rear right seat. The test results indicate that at least the two seat rows should be treated differently in terms of the selection of classification algorithms.