{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.06320541760722348, 'fraction_numerical': 0.029345372460496615, 'mean_word_length': 4.175097276264592, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 5, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Total and regional bone density in male runners, cyclists, and controls.

PURPOSE
Male athletes who were runners (N = 12), cyclists (N = 14), or both (N = 13) were compared with nonexercising age-matched controls (N = 23) for total and regional bone mineral density (BMD). All athletic subjects had competed for a minimum of 3 yr and trained for a minimum of 4 h x wk(-1). Runners undertook no cycling and cyclists undertook no running training.


METHODS
All subjects were scanned for whole body and L1-L4 spine BMD using a Hologic QDR 1000W scanner (Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA).


RESULTS
There were no differences in age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), % fat, or hours of training between any of the athletic groups (P > 0.05), although compared with controls, runners and cyclists had lower body mass index (P < 0.01) and all athletic groups had lower % fat (P < 0.001). Compared with controls, runners had greater total and leg BMD (P < 0.05), cyclists had reduced spine BMD (P = 0.05), and athletes of the "both" group had greater total (P < 0.05) and arm BMD (P < 0.01).


CONCLUSION
Running is associated with increased bone density, particularly in the leg, whereas cycling is associated with a mild decrease in bone density in the spine. In athletes who do both, running exerts a stronger influence than cycling.