{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015625, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.047169811320755, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Failure to agree in agrammatism

The purpose of this paper is to consider, in one particular respect, the bearing on linguistic theory of the study of aphasia. We will examine the inflectional deficits reported in the literature on aphasia and see how they can be accommodated in contemporary minimalism, holding minimal impairment as a basic assumption. The association between agreement (to which inflection relates) and movement embedded in the minimalist theories will also be considered and shown to be at least potentially problematic. To conclude, a proposal will be made to accommodate for the facts of agrammatism in a natural way.