{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017957351290684626, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.326241134751773, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Do we understand sustainable development?

Perhaps because it suffers a poor public image for environmental and social concerns, the construction industry has come under increasing scrutiny in recent years. Much of that scrutiny centres on the extent to which construction contributes, or detracts from, notions of ‘sustainable development’. But the industry can be forgiven if it struggles to take sustainable development, or sustainability, on board since there is a shortage of sound guidance on just what the concept means and what the industry would have to do to achieve it. Moreover, the problem is not confined to the narrow definition of the construction sector, but embraces the wider industry inclusive of the relevant extractive industries, the professional bodies associated with it, and the problems of how the building stock and the resulting heritage is subsequently managed.