{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03209281301792979, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01612174175079102, 'mean_word_length': 5.55011983645848, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Adipocyte Speciﬁc Signaling

Adipocytes are the most abundant cells within the adipose tissue and are the cell type responsible for the tissue dynamic metabolic and endocrine activity. Under energy surplus conditions, the adipocyte is able to suffer hypertrophy in order to accommodate energy in form of lipids. Simultaneously, new adipocytes are differentiated through a complex and speciﬁc process, known as adipogenesis. While this process seems clear for white adipocytes in white adipose tissue, brown adipocytes signaling and regulatory control of adipocyte functions, particularly adipogenesis and adipocyte browning. Emerging insights of these processes are herein discussed, as promising therapeutic targets for obesity and other common metabolic disorders.

signaling and regulatory control of adipocyte functions, particularly adipogenesis and adipocyte browning. Emerging insights of these processes are herein discussed, as promising therapeutic targets for obesity and other common metabolic disorders.

Introduction
The adipose tissue (AT) is a metabolically active organ that acts as the main energy repository in the human body and as an endocrine organ able to synthesize several biologically active molecules that regulate metabolic homeostasis. The AT fulfils several functions, which may vary among fat depots due to its size, distribution, and heterogeneity according to the molecular, morphological, and metabolic profiles [1]. In humans, there are two main types of AT, white AT (WAT) and brown AT (BAT), with relevant differences in morphology and function. In the human body, BAT is mainly located in the supraclavicular, periadrenal, and paravertebral regions [2] and its relative proportion decreases since birth into adulthood [3]. Although BAT is also able to store energy in form of fat, the main activity of the tissue lies in heat production or thermogenesis [4]. In contrast, WAT contribution for thermogenesis is nearly irrelevant, but presents much broader physiological functions. Despite WAT being widely distributed in the human body, 80% of total body fat is located subcutaneously, with the main fat depots in the abdominal and femoral-gluteal regions. The remaining 20% are located around the visceral organs, predominantly in proximity to abdominal visceral AT, such as mesenteric and omental, and around the kidney in the retroperitoneal region [5]. By involving organs and infiltrating tissues, the WAT not only offers mechanical protection, but also plays an important role in the regulation of the body temperature, acting as a thermal insulator [4,6]. Furthermore, WAT accomplishes multiple other functions, such as immune, endocrine, and regenerative [7,8].
The AT is mainly constituted by adipocytes. Adipocytes are very unique cells due to their morphology and functions. Adipocytes are responsible for the dynamic activity of the AT, conferring metabolic and endocrine activity to the tissue. The process of cellular differentiation into adipocytes, or adipogenesis, is a specific and finely regulated process which differs in WAT and BAT. While white adipocytes are the "classic" adipocytes, whose main function is to accumulate energy in form of lipids in large lipid droplets, brown adipocytes are rather distinct. Brown adipocytes are described as being smaller in comparison to white adipocytes, with relatively abundant cytoplasm, numerous small lipid droplets of different sizes and numerous mitochondria that produce heat by fatty acids oxidation [4]. More recently, a third type of adipocytes was identified, being characterized as an intermediate morphology between brown and white adipocytes. These adipocytes also have a thermogenic activity and a high number of mitochondria, thus have been termed as beige or brite adipocytes. In this chapter, the specific signaling and regulatory control of adipocytes will be discussed, particularly white and brown adipogenesis, thermogenesis, and the interchange between the two adipocyte phenotypes with focus on WAT browning and beige adipocytes development.

White Adipogenesis
Adipose tissue mass accumulation is associated with adipocyte cell hypertrophy and increased number of white adipocytes. Whenever there is an energy surplus, excess energy is predominantly accumulated in the form of lipids in white adipocytes, which hypertrophy as the lipid droplets size increase. This WAT buffering activity is suggested as an adaptive response to energy excess, which protects other tissues from lipotoxicity [9]. The maintenance of WAT homeostasis includes simultaneous cell hyperplasia, a phenomena by which adipocyte precursors, or preadipocytes, proliferate and differentiate into mature adipocytes [10]. Thus, this process denominated adipogenesis culminates with the formation of new adipocyte cells and consists of a two phase process ( Fig. 15.1). The first step towards the differentiation into the adipocyte lineage consists in the generation of preadipocytes from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The second phase includes the terminal differentiation of preadipocytes into functional mature adipocytes, including morphologic alterations and the formation of lipid droplets. As mature adipocytes are not able to proliferate in vivo, the regeneration and hyperplasia of the WAT is thought to be dependent on the proliferative capacity of a pool of precursor cells, the preadipocytes [11]. In general, the term "preadipocyte" is widely used to describe a progenitor cell that is responsible for the formation of mature adipocytes [12]. A crucial property of preadipocytes is the ability to proliferate and differentiate into mature adipocytes in order to maintain the AT homeostasis 1 Schematic illustration of white adipogenesis. White adipogenesis is described as two-step process, starting with the proliferation and commitment of white preadipocytes and culminating with the terminal differentiation to mature white adipocytes. The differentiation process starts with the expression of two CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBP), C/EBPB and C/EBPD, which directly induce the expression of C/EBPA and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG), the most important transcriptional regulators of adipogenesis. Then, C/EBPA and PPARG directly induce self-expression in a positive feedback mechanism, activating several downstream adipocyte-specific genes throughout the lifespan of a living organism [13]. These cells are also characterized as a committed cell population destined to proliferate and differentiate only into the adipose-lineage, although morphologically undistinguished from its progenitors [14,15]. Preadipocytes are thought to arise from MSCs and more specifically from human adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). In fact, ADSCs were first identified in 2002 as a subpopulation of multipotent self-renewing cells isolated from WAT that are morphologically and phenotypically similar to the MSCs [16]. Then, ADSCs were isolated, cultured, and termed human multipotent adipose-derived stem cells (hMADSCs) [17]. As hMADSCs maintain the capacity to enter the adipose lineage and to differentiate into cells that present characteristics highly similar to native human adipocytes, these are considered as a faithful model to study human AT physiology [18][19][20]. One of the major focus in adipocyte biology research concerns the identification of distinct cellular intermediates between ASCs and fully functional adipocytes, although there is a lack of specific biomarkers to identify and isolate these cells. However, preadipocytes isolated from different AT present different characteristics in terms of gene expression profiles, proliferation, differentiation, and consequently signaling pathways [21]. Furthermore, adipocytes from different fat depots also present different functional properties, contributions towards energy homeostasis and thus different behaviors during metabolic disease scenarios [22,23]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these AT regional-dependent differences remain unknown.
The second and last phase of adipogenesis is the terminal differentiation, where preadipocytes acquire a phenotype of mature adipocytes. Mature white adipocytes are cells specialized in the synthesis, storage, and mobilization of lipids, which are accumulated in the lipid droplet. This lipid droplet occupies the majority of the adipocyte cytoplasm and consequently the nucleus is found at the periphery of the cell [24]. The terminal differentiation consists of a cascade of transcriptional events which culminates in the formation of mature adipocytes. It is thought that the differentiation process starts with the expression of two CCAAT/enhancerbinding proteins (C/EBP), C/EBPB and C/EBPD, which directly induce the expression of C/EBPA and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG), the most important transcriptional regulators of adipogenesis [25,26]. Then, C/EBPA and PPARG directly induce its own expression in a positive feedback mechanism [27] and activate several downstream adipocyte-specific genes that are necessary for adipocyte function, including fatty acid binding protein/adipose protein 2 (FABP/aP2), insulin receptor, glucose transporters (GLUTs), acetyl-coA carboxylase, fatty acid synthase, and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) [28]. Although the factors that control proliferation, commitment, and differentiation of preadipocytes are still poorly characterized, some important regulatory pathways were already identified ( Fig. 15.2) and will be discussed on the subsequent topics.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARG)
Inducing the expression of PPARG, the major transcriptional regulator of adipogenesis, is sufficient to induce terminal adipocyte differentiation. In fact, it is thought that it is not possible to induce preadipocytes terminal differentiation in the absence of PPARG [29]. Moreover, all essential signaling pathways in adipogenesis seems to converge on the regulation of PPARG expression or activity [30]. There are two isoforms of PPARG (PPARG1 and PPARG2) that are generated by alternative splicing and both are induced during adipogenesis [31]. The adipogenic activity of both PPARG isoforms differs and PPARG2 was found to be more efficient in promoting terminal differentiation. Both PPARG1 and PPARG2 were observed to induce adipocyte differentiation in Pparg knockout fibroblasts, although at higher efficiency for PPARG2 [32]. Additionally, it was demonstrated that 3T3-L1 cells, a cell line originally established from primary murine embryonic fibroblasts able to differentiate into adipocytes, would undergo adipocyte differentiation in the presence of exogenous PPARG2 but not PPARG1 despite the inhibition of Pparg1 and Pparg2 genes by zin-finger proteins [33]. However, studies in animal knockout models yielded contradictory results, which adds complexity and discussion to the topic. For an instance, PPARG2 knockout mice were shown to have decreased AT size and impaired adipogenesis in one study [34], while other authors observed normal AT size and adipocyte morphology in these mice although insulin resistance was reported [35]. Thus, while PPARG2 is important for adipogenesis in vivo, is hypothesized not to be absolutely required when PPARG1 is normally expressed. Additionally, PPARG is essential for the maintenance of adipocytes differentiated state. Inhibition of PPARG in mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes led to de-differentiation with loss of lipid accumulation and reduced expression of adipocyte specific markers [36]. Moreover, in vivo inducible knockout of Pparg led to apoptosis in differentiated adipocytes and stimulated new adipocytes generation [37]. These studies highlight the complexity in PPARG signaling for adipocytes differentiation and physiology. Abbreviations ACTRII-activin type II receptor; C/EBPA-CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; C/EBPB-CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta; C/EBPD-CCAAT/enhancerbinding protein delta; DLK1-delta-like 1 homolog; ERK-extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FGF-1-fibroblast growth factor 1; FGF1R-fibroblast growth factor 1 receptor; FGF-2-fibroblast growth factor 2; FZD-frizzled receptor; HH-hedgehog; LRP5/6-low-density lipoproteinreceptor-related protein 5 and 6 co-receptors; PPARG-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; PTC-patched receptor; Smo-smoothened protein; TACE-tumor necrosis alpha converting enzyme; TGF-B-transforming growth factor beta; TGFBR-transforming growth factor beta receptor; TNF-A-tumor necrosis factor alpha; Wnt-wingless-type MMTV integration site; B-Cat-Beta-catenin

CCAAT/Enhancer-Binding Protein (C/EBP) Family
The C/EBP family is constituted by important regulators of adipocyte differentiation. Indeed, the C/EBP family participates in a signaling cascade where C/EBPB and C/EBPD induce the expression of C/EBPA and thus terminal differentiation of adipocytes. Although C/EBPB and C/EBPD can compensate each other in case of loss or inhibition, there is evidence that both factors are not absolutely needed for adipogenesis. A study with knockout mice for C/EBPB or C/EBPD shown that lack of these factors reduces AT size. In addition, double-knockout for C/EBPB and C/EBPD led to a greater reduction of the AT mass. However, the levels of C/ebpa and Pparg mRNA in adipocytes from double-knockout mice remain normal, which raised the hypothesis that absence of C/EBPB or C/EBPD could result only in abnormal lipogenesis and not adipogenesis inhibition [38]. These findings point out that C/EBPB and C/EBPD may not be essential for adipogenesis in vivo as other signaling pathways can produce similar effects. On the other hand, C/EBPA is known to have a much more important role in adipogenesis. For instance, inducing C/EBPA in vitro is sufficient to trigger differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes [39]. Moreover, mice where the C/ebpa locus was replaced by C/ebpb present reduced AT size [40], while knockout mice for C/ebpa depict an almost absence of WAT [39]. Besides, the expression of C/EBPA in differentiated adipocytes is also important for insulin sensitivity [41]. In this study, it is proposed that C/EBPA triggers the expression of GLUT4 and insulin-dependent glucose transport. In the absence of C/EBPA, GLUT4 is not expressed and cells are rendered insensitive to insulin. Nonetheless, C/EBPA needs the presence of PPARG to efficiently promote adipogenesis since the expression of C/EBPA in knockout fibroblasts for Pparg cannot induce adipocyte differentiation [42]. In addition, C/EBPB needs PPARG to induce the expression of C/EBPA and start the terminal differentiation pathway [43]. Hence, C/EBPs family members, with especial focus in C/EBPA, are indeed important but PPARG expression is crucial for adipogenesis.

Fibroblasts Growth Factors (FGF)
One of the most important signaling pathways regulating adipogenesis concerns the autocrine/paracrine role of fibroblast growth factors (FGF). Undifferentiated hMADSCs with reduced FGF-2 secretion were observed to proliferate more slowly [44]. On the other hand, hMADSCs supplemented with FGF-2 would recover and proliferate much faster illustrating that this signaling pathway is essential for proliferation in these cells. FGF-2 has a high affinity for FGF type 1 receptor (FGF1R), which activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 pathway, leading to cellular proliferation [45]. In fact, hMADSCs treated with a specific FGF1R inhibitor presented a reduced differentiation potential [44,46]. These findings suggested that FGF-2 is secreted by hMADSCs in order to regulate their proliferative potential through FGF1R/ERK signaling pathway. Additionally, FGF-2 plays a role in preadipocytes differentiation. FGF-2 effects were reported to be dose-dependent, where FGF-2 can function as either a positive or negative adipogenic factor [47]. FGF-2 at concentrations lower than 2 ng/ml promoted differentiation of hMADSCs, while concentrations higher than 10 ng/ml inhibited the differentiation. These effects are also mediated by the FGF1R/ERK signaling pathway, where high concentrations of FGF-2 are able to sustain ERK phosphorylation and lead PPARG phosphorylation, consequently blocking terminal differentiation. Furthermore, FGF-2 levels in WAT of diet induced obese mice were observed to be lower than those from normal diet mice, indicating that FGF-2 expression levels could have a reverse correlation with the fat tissues size. Thus, FGF-2 was hypothesized to play a protective role in obesity and metabolic disease. These findings are further supported by another study conducted in AT of morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery or lean controls who underwent cholecystectomy [48]. ASCs were obtained from WAT of these individuals and the worse metabolic scenarios were accompanied by a reduced ASCs proliferation rate and decreased FGF-2 secretion. Together, these results suggest that FGF-2 and WAT hyperplasia play a protective role against metabolic syndrome. However, not only FGF-2 but also FGF-1 plays a role in adipogenesis [46]. In fact, FGF-1 seems to be involved in the regulation of FGF-2. FGF-1 treated hMADSCs were reported to have reduced FGF-2 levels by 80%. Moreover, FGF-2 knockout hMADSCs presented decreased proliferation and increased adipogenic genes expression [49]. Thus, while FGF-2 seems to be essential for preadipocytes proliferation, FGF-1 seems to downregulate its secretion, promoting differentiation. For instance, obese individuals also present increased expression of FGF-1 in WAT, which supports the hypothesis of a protective role for FGF-1/2 [50]. Interestingly, in obese individuals were subjected to weigh loss FGF-1 levels were reported to remain high, which may constitute a permanent alteration due to obesity. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to test that hypothesis.

Activin A and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-B) Family
Activin A is a member of the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-B) family and is also secreted by undifferentiated hMADSCs. In fact, activin A was proposed as a biomarker of undifferentiated hMADSCs [51]. Similarly to FGF-2, activin A secretion promotes hMADSCs proliferation and blocks differentiation in an autocrine/paracrine fashion. Activin A effects are mediated via activin type II receptor, which activates Smad2 in order to increase cellular proliferation and inhibit C/EBPB [52]. Thus, while activin A secretion is increased, hMADSCs will proliferate but will not differentiate whereas activin A inhibition leads to hMADSCs differentiation. Interestingly, increased levels of activin A were also found in the WAT of obese individuals [51]. When expressed in high levels, activin A was also reported to act as a profibrotic agent, stimulating the transformation of preadipocytes into myofibroblasts [53,54]. In fact, AT fibrosis in the context of human obesity limits adipocyte hypertrophy, with beneficial effects on systemic metabolism [55]. Therefore, activin A acts together with FGF-1/2 to constitute a complex and finely regulated signaling pathway in adipogenesis. However, the mechanisms that regulate the increased secretion of FGF-2 and activin A by preadipocytes and subsequent inhibition with terminal differentiation still need to be clarified. There is some evidence that WAT microenvironment is the main responsible for this modulation and that not only preadipocytes and adipocytes regulate adipogenesis. For instance, macrophages isolated from the AT of obese individuals are reported to produce factors that stimulated the expression of FGF-2 and activin A in hMADSCs [51]. Indeed, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-A) is one of the factors secreted by macrophages reported to increase FGF-2 and activin A expression in hMADSCs [20]. Obesity and AT mass accumulation are linked with inflammation and macrophages infiltration [56]. Thus, macrophages are thought to be essential for adipogenesis and WAT homeostasis. Besides activin A, other members of the TGF-B family are reported to regulate adipogenesis. In fact, TGF-B itself is mostly inhibitory [57]. Studies using 3T3 cell lines (fibroblast cell line) showed that TGF-B increases preadipocyte proliferation, while inhibiting differentiation through Smad3 signaling [58]. However, other studies reported that this inhibitory effect is restricted to the first 40 h due to TFG-B type I and II receptors downregulation during differentiation [58,59]. The activation of the Smad3 pathway is similar to Smad2, decreasing the expression of PPARG and C/EBPA due to the physical inhibition of C/EBPB and C/EBPD [60]. Besides, Smad3 signaling also involves up-regulation of Wnt signaling pathway factors [61], which will be addressed in further detail in the next section.
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), are another subtype of growth factor members of the TGF-B family, which also regulate ASCs adipogenesis in an autocrine and dose-dependent manner. For instance, BMP4 is probably the most notorious member of the BMP family in terms of proadipogenic effects [57]. BMP4 activates Smad1/5/8 and positively regulates PPARG expression, whereas BMP4 inhibition leads to reduced lipid droplets size [62]. Moreover, BMP4 has a role in preadipocytes proliferation. While in high doses significantly reduces cell proliferation, in low doses reduces the number of apoptotic cells and increases proliferation [63]. Interestingly, BMP4 promotes differentiation of brown preadipocytes into white adipocytes, reducing the expression of brown-specific proteins. In addition, obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus present higher levels of BMP4 [64]. These studies highlight a possible role for BMP in adipocytes physiology and disease mechanisms associated with diabetes and obesity, but further studies are needed to unveil the mechanisms controlled by this pathway.

Wingless-Type MMTV Integration Site (Wnt) Family
Wingless-type MMTV integration site (Wnt) family members are highly conserved signaling glycoproteins with autocrine/paracrine action, known to for regulating tissue homeostasis and remodeling [25]. Wnts exhibit two distinct signaling pathways, denominated "canonical" and "noncanonical". The canonical pathway is linked with the transcriptional factor Beta-catenin. In sum, Wnts binds to frizzled receptors (FZD) and low-density lipoprotein-receptor-related protein-5 or protein-6 coreceptors (LRP5/6) blocking the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of Betacatenin, which in turn is hypophosphorylated and translocated to the nucleus to bind lymphoid-enhancer-binding factor/T-cell-specific transcription factor (LEF/TCF) and induce the expression of Wnt target genes [65]. The Wnt canonical signaling pathway has an antiadipogenic activity. In support of this hypothesis, are the repeated observations showing that Wnt pathway blocking leads to spontaneous adipocyte differentiation [66][67][68]. Furthermore, LRP5/6 activation inhibits terminal differentiation, whereas LRP5/6 inactivation exerts the opposite effect [69][70][71]. In fact, Wnt1 represses terminal differentiation through downregulation of PPARG and C/EBPA [66]. In addition, Wnt10b, previously known as Wnt12, is also described as an important antiadipogenic factor and an adipogenic switch in adipogenesis. Wnt10b is another member of the Wnt family whose gene is clustered with Wnt. Wnt10b is highly expressed in preadipocytes, which also stabilizes Beta-catenin and inhibits terminal differentiation. In addition, Wnt10b inhibition also promoted preadipocyte differentiation [72]. Thus, Wnt canonical signaling pathway is hypothesized to be an important molecular switch regulating adipogenesis, which is suppressed until the pathway is no longer activated. In fact, PPARG and Beta-catenin are mutual antagonists. The activation of PPARG decreases Beta-catenin levels due to its degradation through proteasomal complexes [73]. Therefore, once preadipocytes receive the trigger to initiate the PPARG positive feedback mechanism, become committed to terminal differentiation. On the other hand, the noncanonical pathway is related with intracellular Ca 2+ release, which activates the phosphatase calcineurin and the Ca 2+ -sensitive kinases Ca 2+ /calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CAMKII) and protein kinase C [74]. Contrastingly, the noncanonical pathway can either promote adipogenesis through antagonism of the canonical pathway or inhibit adipogenesis in a similar fashion to the canonical pathway. For instance, Wnt5b increases during adipogenesis and promotes terminal differentiation through inhibition of Beta-catenin [75]. However, Wnt5a is reported to inhibit terminal differentiation by activating Beta-catenin and suppressing the activity of PPARG, thus inducing terminal differentiation, via a pathway unrelated to Ca 2+ [76]. Altogether, these findings illustrate the complexity of the signaling intrinsic to adipogenesis and further studies are needed.

Delta-Like 1 Homolog (DLK1/Pref-1)
Delta-like 1 homolog (DLK1), also known as preadipocyte factor 1 (Pref-1), is a transmembrane glycoprotein that can be cleaved by tumor necrosis alpha converting enzyme (TACE), originating a biologically active soluble form [77,78]. DLK1 is highly expressed by proliferating preadipocytes and is suppressed during differentiation [79]. In fact, several studies reported that high DLK1 levels in preadipocytes inhibits differentiation [80][81][82] while reduced levels enhances differentiation [83]. More recently, DLK1 knockout mice were shown to have enhanced preadipocyte proliferation, which was associated with a reduced membrane-bound form of DLK1 whereas a soluble form of DLK1 had no effect on preadipocyte proliferation but in the terminal differentiation process [84]. Thus, it was hypothesized that the membrane form and soluble form of DLK1 are likely to have distinct functions and targets [85]. Although DLK1 is considered essential for adipogenic regulation, these results remain controversial since DLK1 interaction molecules remain to be identified.

Hedgehog (Hh) Pathway
Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway also plays a role in adipogenesis. Hh binds to the Patched receptor (Ptc), which cease the suppressor effect on smoothened protein (Smo) [86,87]. Smo activates a signaling cascade that results in the stabilization of the transcription factors Gli1 and Gli2, inducing the transcription of Hh target genes [88]. Moreover, Hh signaling pathway seems to interact with the ERK pathway [89] thus suggesting an association with the aforementioned pathways. In fact, Hh basal levels are needed for human MSCs proliferation [90]. Additionally, Smo inhibition by cyclopamine, thus inhibiting the Hh signaling, decreased human MSC proliferation and led to cell cycle arrest, which was associated with a decrease in cyclin A expression and consequently an increase in the active form of retinoblastoma protein (pRb) expression. Conversely, the ability to differentiate human MSCs was not affected, although another study observed that Hh decreases during the differentiation step and that Smo activation impaired preadipocytes terminal differentiation through downregulation of PPARG and C/EBPA [91]. More recently, Hh was demonstrated to inhibit not only adipocyte differentiation but also lipogenesis in adipocytes in vitro, which in turn improved the metabolic condition of diet-induced obese mice [92].

Zinc-Finger Proteins
Zinc-finger proteins are crucial molecules involved in adipogenesis regulation. Kruppel-like factors (KLF) family members are zinc-finger proteins, known for playing numerous roles in the regulation of apoptosis, proliferation, and differentiation [93]. In fact, several members of the KLF family are described as adipogenic regulators. KLF15 is known to promote differentiation and the expression of adipocyterelated genes in preadipocytes, such as GLUT4 [94,95]. KLF4 stimulates the expression of C/EBPB [96], while KLF5 is induced during terminal differentiation by C/EBPB and C/EBPD, which in turn induces the expression of PPARG [97]. Like KLF5, KLF9 binds directly to the PPARG promoter besides also activating PPARG indirectly by binding to C/EBPA [98]. In addition, KLF6 promotes adipogenesis by inhibiting DLK1 [99]. However, some KLFs depict antiadipogenic effects, such as KLF2 that suppresses PPARG expression [100,101]. Thus, a shift in KLFs expression during terminal differentiation is hypothesized to occur, with KLF2 downregulation that is replaced by the other proadipogenic family members [97]. Similarly to KLFs, GATA zinc fingers found in the GATA-family transcription factors are also known to modulate adipogenesis. GATA2 and GATA3 are expressed in preadipocytes and both inhibit PPARG and C/EBPs expression. In addition, GATA2 and GATA3 expression decreases during terminal differentiation [102,103]. There is evidence that GATA3 expression is induced by the Wnt/Beta-catenin pathway [104], however the detailed mechanisms underlying this pathway regulation in preadipocytes are still unknown.

Brown Adipogenesis
Brown adipocytes are the main cellular constituent of BAT. Brown adipocytes are morphologically distinct from white adipocytes, as besides depicting a "brown" color that derives from the large number of mitochondria present in the cell cytoplasm, also present a high number of small lipid droplets. The size of brown adipocytes lipid droplets allows to increase the droplet surface area, which was hypothesized to promote the high rate of metabolite exchange with the mitochondria that is necessary for the thermogenic activity [105]. Brown adipocytes arise from brown preadipocytes, although the pathways underlying brown preadipocytes differentiation are not fully understood. In dedicated BAT depots, brown preadipocytes are known to originate from cells residing in the dermomyotome and express specific transcription factors, including paired-box protein 7 (PAX7), engrailed 1 (EN1), and myogenic factor 5 (MYF5) [106]. Yet, different brown adipocytes subpopulations were described in different BAT depots, which despite not expressing all these factors are still able to differentiate into mature brown adipocytes. Indeed, both brown and white adipocytes from different fat depots were shown to exhibit different gene expression profiles and functional characteristics [107].
In a similar process as depicted by white adipocytes, brown adipocytes can expand in size through lipid accumulation leading to hypertrophy or increase in cell number leading to BAT hyperplasia. However, the main stimulus for brown adipocyte expansion is not energy surplus as for white adipocytes but is instead regulated by the needs to maintain body temperature. In thermoneutral conditions sympathetic stimuli are reduced, thus decreasing brown adipocytes thermogenic activity and increasing lipid accumulation. Several lipid droplets are then combined into a single lipid droplet, leading the brown adipocyte into a hypertrophic state [107]. On the other hand, in a cold environment, thermogenesis is activated and both brown adipocytes cells and BAT sizes decrease. In conditions of persistent cold environment exposure, brown adipogenesis is induced [108,109]. Therefore, brown adipogenesis and thermogenic activity are highly dependent on the cold stimulus.

Brown Adipogenesis Regulation
In general, brown and white adipogenesis share the same signaling cascade, highlighting PPARG and C/EBP family members' role in adipocytes and lipids metabolism. However, some brown adipocyte-specific transcription factors have been identified (Fig. 15.3). Positive regulatory domain containing protein 16 (PRDM16) is described as a transcriptional factor that acts as the main switch of brown adipogenesis. PRDM16 is not only part of a transcriptional complex with C/EBPB and PPARG [110,111], but has also the ability to induce uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1A) Fig. 15.3 Schematic illustration of brown adipogenesis regulation and thermogenesis. Brown adipogenesis is triggered with the expression of PRDM16, leading to the thermogenic phenotype and the expression of UCP1. Abbreviations: C/EBPB-CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta; cAMPcyclic adenosine monophosphate; EBF2-early B-cell factor 2; EN1-engrailed 1; IRF4-interferon regulatory factor 4; MYF5-myogenic factor 5; PAX7-paired-box protein 7; PGC1Aproliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha; PKA-protein kinase A; PPARG-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; PRDM16-Positive regulatory domain containing protein 16; UCP1-uncoupling protein 1; ZFP516-zinc-finger protein 516 expression, resulting in the consequent thermogenic phenotype of brown adipocytes [112,113]. Moreover, genetic deletion of euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 1 (EHMT1), an essential component of PRDM16 complex, decreases brown adipocytes terminal differentiation [114]. Conversely, PRDM16 deletion in brown preadipocytes was found not to affect brown terminal differentiation, which suggests the existence of compensatory pathways [115]. These pathways could be mediated by other PRDM family members, which can induce brown adipogenesis in vivo. One of these members is PRDM3, a PRDM family member that presents a high homology with PRDM16 and forms a complex with EHMT1 and C/EBPB to induce PPARG expression [116]. Thus, EHMT1 is highlighted as a crucial enzymatic regulator of brown adipogenesis. Additionally, early B-cell factor 2 (EBF2) is a transcription factor essential for brown adipogenesis. EBF2 is highly and specifically expressed in brown preadipocytes and adipocytes [117,118]. EBF2 suppresses the expression of several transcription factors, ensuring preadipocytes commitment to the brown adipocyte terminal differentiation [119]. Zinc-finger protein 516 (ZFP516) expression is also reported to induce PRDM16 and brown adipogenesis [120,121].

Thermogenesis
Brown adipocytes are able to rapidly exhibit a high oxidative respiration and substrate oxidation capacity due to the high thermogenic potential and UCP1 expression, a protein that acts as a respiration uncoupler. UCP1 is only found in significant amounts in the mitochondria of thermogenic adipocytes and is described as identical to mitochondrial ADP/ATP carriers [122]. The mechanism of thermogenesis was first proposed by Mitchell and later developed by Nicholls [123]. Briefly, mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes I, III, and IV act as proton pumps, generating a proton gradient where protons are transported from the mitochondria matrix to the intermembrane space. ATP-synthase consume the protons in order to produce ATP from the phosphorylation of ADP, in an endothermic reaction. However, in the presence of an uncoupler protein such as UCP1, which is an inner mitochondrial membrane protein that acts as a proton channel, protons re-entry the mitochondrial matrix from the intermembrane space, collapsing the proton gradient and activating the respiratory chain to compensate the decreased membrane potential. Since the ATP-synthase is no longer able to consume protons in order to produce ATP from ADP, the energy derived from oxidation is then dissipated as heat.
Brown adipocytes are known to produce heat in a process denominated nonshivering thermogenesis. In general, thermogenesis occurs by stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system in response to cold exposure. Whenever there are no requirements to produce extra heat, brown adipocytes remain quiescent and UCP1 is inhibited by purine nucleotides [124]. In fact, inactive brown adipocytes are morphologically similar to white adipocytes, but still preserving the specific genetic and metabolic identity [125]. On the other hand, upon cold stress, norepinephrine is released activating the beta-3 adrenergic receptors and increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), which results in cAMP-driven protein kinase A (PKA) signaling activation. This signaling pathway culminates in lipolysis, the process where triacylglycerol stored in lipid droplets is hydrolyzed in free fatty acids and glycerol, and increased expression of PGC1A and UCP1 [126,127]. PGC1A has a crucial role in thermogenesis regulation in brown adipocytes, although interestingly the knockout of PGC1A in brown preadipocytes does not affect brown adipogenesis [128,129]. PGC1A is highly expressed upon cold stress and PRDM16 induction by cAMP signaling, which results in thermogenic genes activation, such as UCP1 [113]. In addition, cAMP signaling also activates interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), which interacts with PGC1A to form a complex and induces the expression of UCP1 [130]. However, some proteins were identified as inhibitors of PGC1A expression or activity. Receptor-interacting protein 140 (RIP140), together with liver X receptor (LXR) are able to suppress the effects of PGC1A [131,132]. Steroid receptor co-activator 2 (SRC2) and twist-related protein 1 (TWIST1) also suppress PGC1A effects [133,134].
Conversely, recent studies have shown that as long as exogenous free fatty acids are available these may directly increase UCP1 expression, thus brown adipocytes might not be fully dependent of brown adipocytes lipolysis [127,135,136]. In addition, brown adipocytes are able to perform lipogenesis, where free fatty acids are synthesized from circulating glucose [137], besides the ability to also use acyl-carnitines to sustain thermogenesis [138]. Interestingly, upon cold exposure, brown adipocytes depict both catabolic and anabolic reactions by performing thermogenesis and lipogenesis. Due to this paradoxical activity, it is hypothesized that lipogenesis may have other metabolic implications since several intermediates may also act as signaling agents [107,139].

Beige Adipocytes Development
Studies with 18 F-fluodeoxyglucose PET-CT imaging allowed to identify several metabolic and thermogenic active adipose depots in the abdominal and subcutaneous regions in adult human individuals. These studies led to the conclusion that WAT was not completely white [140][141][142]. Indeed, a second type of UCP1-expressing and thermogenic adipocytes were found in WAT. These adipocytes were named brite (brown-like in white) or beige adipocytes. The morphology of beige adipocytes is somewhat intermediary between white and brown adipocytes and can be found within WAT depots mainly upon cold exposure [106]. Thus, when the formation of beige adipocytes is induced, the phenomenon of WAT browning can be observed. Interestingly, each WAT depot has a different susceptibility to browning. While subcutaneous WAT seems to possess a high capacity to undergo a browning process upon cold exposure, the same does not occur in visceral WAT [143]. Even when WAT browning is artificially induced, visceral WAT is not able to reach the browning ability of subcutaneous WAT, which further highlights the molecular differences between fat depots.
The origin of beige adipocytes could be explained by two different theories, although not mutually exclusive (Fig. 15.4). The first line of thought hypothesized that beige adipocytes arise from a precursor cell pool through beige adipogenesis [144]. Beige adipocytes are reported to originate from a preadipocyte population expressing platelet-derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) and stem cells antigen 1 (SCA1) or from smooth muscle-like precursors expressing myosin heavy Fig. 15.4 Schematic illustration of beige adipocytes differentiation. Upon cold exposure, beige adipocytes differentiate from beige preadipocytes or through transdifferentiation of mature white adipocytes. Beige adipocytes express PRDM16 and present a brown phenotype with heat production through thermogenesis. However when the cold stimulus ceases, beige adipocytes are able to return to a white adipocyte phenotype. Abbreviations MYH11-myosin heavy chain 11; A-plateletderived growth factor receptor A; PRDM16-PR domain containing protein 16; SCA1-stem cells antigen 1; UCP1-uncoupling protein 1 chain 11 (MYH11) [106]. On the other hand, another theory defends that beige adipocytes are originated in conditions of thermogenic needs from pre-existing mature adipocytes that undergo a trans-differentiation process, known as adipocyte browning [145,146]. The expression of PRDM16 in preadipocytes upon cold exposure triggers the beige-linked genes expression and beige adipocytes development while suppressing WAT-selective genes [112]. In fact, both hypotheses are possible, but the regulation of the mechanisms leading to each specific route are still unclear. In addition, beige adipocytes were shown to share some activity and differentiation regulation with brown adipocytes, although whether there are beige-specific transcription factors remains to be elucidated. In support of both theories, beige adipocyte differentiation can be induced in experimental conditions using two different approaches. The first method consists in animal models exposure to severely low temperatures (4-6°C), which is thought to be the closest approach to physiological conditions. Low temperature exposure induces UCP1-expressing beige adipocytes in WAT either by beige adipogenesis [147] or through browning of mature white adipocytes [145]. The second method consists in using beta-3 adrenergic agonists to stimulate white adipocytes, which mimics the effects of cold exposure and induces the process of adipocyte browning [148]. Interestingly, treatment with beta-3 adrenergic agonists only functions in mature white adipocytes in vitro as inhibition of this pathway in vivo does not prevents the browning induced by cold stimulus, which suggests that browning induction may be dependent on multiple signaling pathways. Indeed, several other conditions were reported to induce beige adipocytes development, such as physical exercise, cancer cachexia, and peripheral tissue injury [149,150]. Thus, beige adipocytes development seems to be stimulated not only as a thermogenic need, but also to contribute to energy homeostasis.
A distinctive characteristic of beige adipocytes is that the thermogenic ability is inducible and reversible depending on the environmental conditions, as when the cold stress ceases, beige adipocytes are slowly replaced by white adipocytes both in vitro and in vivo [108,151]. These findings suggest that beige adipocytes are only maintained during the presence of the stimuli and upon its withdrawal, these revert to the white adipocytes' phenotype. This short-term maintenance and beige-to-white adipocyte conversion or "adipocyte whitening" was attributed to the loss of mitochondrial biogenesis and activity upon the withdrawal of external stimuli [149]. It was hypothesized that adipocyte whitening is linked with mitophagy, a selective form of autophagy responsible for mitochondria degradation. The blockade of the mitophagy pathway prevents adipocyte whitening even upon external stimuli removal and thus leads to the prolongation of the thermogenic activity of beige adipocytes. Moreover, this thermogenic activity was associated with higher energy expenditure and protection against diet-induced obesity [151]. As autophagy pathways are dysregulated in AT of obese and diabetic patients [152] and adipocyte whitening seems to be faster in obese subjects [151], detailed understanding of these pathways could be highly relevant for the development of new pharmacological targets for obesity treatment.

Unconventional Thermogenesis of Beige Adipocytes
UCP1 has been described as the main thermogenic protein in AT thermogenesis. However, it was reported that UCP1 knockout mice exposed to cold still exhibited higher respiration rates in WAT [153]. Moreover, chronic treatment with beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonists in the same animal model also increased the respiration of WAT [154]. Therefore, this implies the existence of UCP1-independent thermogenic pathways. In fact, a specific UCP1-independent thermogenic pathway in beige adipocytes was noticed [155]. This novel and unconventional pathway involves ATP-dependent Ca 2+ cycling by sarco/endoplasmatic reticulum Ca 2+ -ATPase 2b (SERCA2b) and ryanodine receptor 2 (RyR2). This specific thermogenic pathway is only possible in beige adipocytes due to the high capacity of ATP generation by glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid metabolism. These findings also led the authors to state that this novel pathway could be a potential pharmacological target to improve metabolic health in the elderly population, known to possess a low number of UCP1-positive adipocytes.

Conclusions and Future Perspectives
White, brown, and beige adipocyte differentiation and function are regulated by unique and complex signaling processes. Although some pathways were already identified, the search for factors that regulate adipogenesis just reached the light of the day. While the C/EBP family and PPARG are the main regulators of both white and brown adipogenesis, other transcription factors and signaling proteins that regulate in a direct way and/or upstream/downstream the terminal differentiation signaling cascade are still missing in the big signaling puzzle. In this sense, the new technology of CRISPR-Cas9 may be revolutionary for genetic studies and further extend the knowledge on key adipocyte regulators. Moreover, emerging evidence also highlights the role of miRNAs signaling and epigenetic regulation during adipogenesis and metabolic dysregulation scenarios. Compelling data concerning adipocyte-selective miRNAs that modulate adipocyte proliferation and differentiation [156,157] point out a considerable new trend in adipocyte biology research. Additionally, the high cellular heterogeneity among adipocytes from different or even within fat depots makes it imperative to characterize their origin and distinct signaling pathways. Nonetheless, WAT browning and inducible thermogenesis is a compelling treatment approach for metabolic diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. A better understanding of the pathways concerning beige adipogenesis and adipocyte browning may point out to promising novel drugs. Given the increasing prevalence and the high health and economic impact of obesity and obesity related disorders, new insights concerning beige adipogenesis and adipocyte browning must be set as a priority in the years to come.