{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018589393110989613, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0038272279934390375, 'mean_word_length': 5.398601398601398, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
New Concepts for the Determination of Oxidation Efficiencies in Liquid Chromatography-Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry.

In liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (LC-IRMS), analytes are separated on an LC system and consecutively oxidized to CO2, which is required for the determination of compound-specific carbon isotope ratios. Oxidation is performed in an online reactor by sulfate radicals. Reaction conditions in the interface depend on the flow conditions determined by the LC method and the flow rates and concentrations of oxidation agent and phosphoric acid added in the interface. To determine accurate isotope ratios, a quantitative conversion of the carbon contained in the analyte to the CO2 measurement gas is a prerequisite. Oxidation efficiencies are not commonly evaluated during method development, although certain analytes are known to be difficult to be oxidized by sulfate radicals. For the assessment of the oxidation efficiency of the LC-IRMS system, three different approaches were evaluated. (1) Residual organic carbon in the eluent stream of the interface was determined to calculate oxidation yields depending on the initial analyte concentration. (2) The IRMS response was calibrated to an inorganic carbon reference material to determine oxidation efficiencies with the help of the IRMS as a detector. (3) The oxidation temperature was deliberately reduced while monitoring the δ13C and signal intensity. The common assumption that a linear relation of IRMS signal to analyte concentration is an indicator for complete oxidation in LC-IRMS could be disproved. All three approaches can be applied for future method development in LC-IRMS, monitoring of existing flow injection applications, as well as for verification of complete oxidation in established LC-IRMS methods.