{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01757469244288225, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.7, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Debating Climate Law: Conclusion

This book would have achieved one of its goals if the reader was to leave with more doubt about the right answer on the various topics examined in this book than she had when first opening it. Climate law is still a young discipline, with many unanswered existential and other fundamental questions. There is some wisdom in at least acknowledging the deep divisions. 
 
Our collection of staged debates, along with our set of ‘reflections’ on heavily debated topics, reveal the existence of three fundamental questions for climate law.