{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01921229586935639, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01921229586935639, 'mean_word_length': 5.353658536585366, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Optimizing Russian Gender : A preliminary analysis

Research has established that nouns are assigned to gender classes as a function of meaning and shape (Corbett 1991, Comrie 1999). Once this point has been made for several individual languages, research should move towards the establishment of a typologically robust theory of gender assignment. One example of such a theory is optimal gender assignment theory (Rice 2004), which formalizes several of the key insights in Steinmetz’ (1985, 1986) theory. A robust theory of gender assignment must identify the general principles that are relevant for gender assignment, while at the same time providing a strategy for correctly assigning nouns to their gender category. The burdens on a theory of gender assignment also include the requirement that the theory be crosslinguistically robust. Finally, the construction of a theory of gender assignment should avoid theoretical idiosyncrasies and instead aspire to a formalism independently shown to be motivated for other domains of grammar.