{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012129380053908356, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.076190476190476, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Robotic versus Standard Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flaps: Early Outcomes

CONCLUSION: While not a common occurrence overall, disseminating patient photos is significantly more prevalent in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery than other surgical subspecialties. There are several commonalities among litigation cases including opt-out consent forms and clerical error. Given the associated financial liability involved with litigation cases, we suggest taking several steps to mitigate expose risk. This includes establishing two separate photo consent forms for internal and external use and establishing an auditing process whenever publishing patient photos external to the electronic medical records.