{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017289719626168223, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0009345794392523365, 'mean_word_length': 5.753943217665615, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Leaf trichomes influence predatory mite densities through dispersal behavior

Habitat complexity can mediate interactions among predators and herbivores and influences arthropod population density and community structure. The abundance of many predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) is positively associated with abundance of non‐glandular trichomes. We hypothesized that (1) increasing the complexity (trichome density mimicked with cotton fiber patches) of the habitat that predatory mites encounter on leaves would reduce adult dispersal from plants, and (2) increasing habitat complexity would reduce the time that mites spend walking. Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten retention on plants increased linearly in the presence of trichome mimics; mites placed on plants lacking leaf trichomes showed a behavioral response that led to active dispersal. Phytoseiid retention increased with both fiber patch size and fiber density within patches. Moving fiber patches from the underside of the leaf to the upper leaf surface did not change phytoseiid retention but did alter egg distribution, suggesting trichomes do not exclusively influence phytoseiid behavior. Phytoseiid activity level as measured by the amount of time spent walking did not decrease with the addition of fibers. Overall, increasing habitat complexity in the form of non‐glandular trichomes strongly reduced T. pyri dispersal behavior; the predatory mites showed a consistent preference for complex trichome‐rich habitat that was manifest both rapidly and in absence of predators. Hence, the frequently observed pattern of population‐level accumulation of phytoseiids on trichome‐rich plants appears to be driven by a behavioral response to the presence and abundance of non‐glandular trichomes on the leaf surface manifested in the level of dispersal and/or retention. The primary implication of phytoseiid–habitat interactions for biocontrol programs is that where plants have no trichomes, T. pyri will not establish. Whether this behavioral response pattern is a general response of phytoseiids to leaf trichomes or varies with species is a question that remains unanswered.