{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027624309392265192, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.558282208588957, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Aristotelianism in Morris R. Cohen's Legal Philosophy

The philosophy of law was a major component of Morris Raphael Cohen's commitment to philosophy. “To examine anew the problem of social ends in relation to law and morals and the life of civilization” he considered “an essential task of philosophy”. Where better than in the legal arena could one follow the living play of the social order in the light of logical method and ethical purpose? How did Cohen acquire this classical view of the task of philosophy, which in the early twentieth century seemed so foreign to his compatriots? For the Hebrews, God is a law giver, Moses a law teacher, and the Talmud, commentaries on the Law. Even God has to forbear from infringing the duty to be just. “My interest in the philosophy of law”, said Morris né Moses, “has its roots in the fact that my very first education was Mosaic and Talmudic legislation”.