{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028310502283105023, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011872146118721462, 'mean_word_length': 5.122905027932961, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A survey of public health partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases in Canada.

OBJECTIVE
To describe the range of practice for sexually transmitted disease (STD) contact tracing/partner notification (PN) by public health agencies in Canada.


METHODS
A two-level mailed survey, using two different questionnaires, was conducted from Aug. 1991 to Feb. 1992, directed to: 1) provincial and territorial epidemiologists/directors of STD control, asking about program organization; and 2) 154 local health units/provincially run PN programs, asking about practice patterns of STD partner notification.


CONCLUSIONS
In Canada, STD PN by public health agencies is routinely practised in most provinces. PN efforts vary by the STD; less PN effort goes to chlamydia despite a high burden of illness; HIV PN is frequently perceived to be within the responsibility of the physician. For STDs with higher PN effort, the preferred method is provider referral. Targeting is seldom utilized, and there are little available data at a local level monitoring even process measures of effectiveness.