{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01885014137606032, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.247058823529412, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A TEST OF THE SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT GAME: FIGHTING IN THE BOWL AND DOILY SPIDER FRONTINELLA PYRAMITELA

Male bowl and doily spiders (Frontinella pyramitela: Linyphiidae) engage in dangerous fights over access to females. Relatively smaller individuals are more at risk of fatal injury than their larger opponents. Males assess relative fighting ability during contests: smaller individuals tend to give up quickly. Fights occur between a male with information about the value of the contested female (number of fertilizable eggs) and an intruding male with less information. In this paper, a sequential assessment game (a game theory model of fighting behavior) is adapted to male combat in the bowl and doily spider to attempt a quantitative test. The model makes predictions about fight duration, probability of winning, and the occurrence of fatalities as a function of resource value and size asymmetry. Comparison with empirical data from staged contests yields a generally good quantitative agreement with the predictions. A few deviations are also noted.