{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033617212012550426, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01523980277902286, 'mean_word_length': 5.4508670520231215, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
NIMG-26. IMPROVING THE GENERALIZABILITY OF DEEP LEARNING FOR T2-LESION SEGMENTATION OF GLIOMAS IN THE POST-TREATMENT SETTING


 Although current advances for automated glioma lesion segmentation and volumetric measurements using deep learning have yielded high performance on newly-diagnosed patients, response assessment in neuro-oncology still relies on manually-drawn, cross-sectional areas of the tumor because these models do not generalize to patients in the post-treatment setting, where they are most needed in the clinic. Surgical resections, adjuvant treatment, or disease progression can alter the characteristics of these lesions on T2-weighted imaging, causing measures of segmentation accuracy, typically measured by Dice coefficients of overlap (DCs), to drop by ~15%. To improve the generalizability of T2-lesion segmentation to patients with glioma post-treatment, we evaluated the effects of: 1) training with different proportions of newly-diagnosed and treated gliomas, 2) applying transfer learning from pre- to post-treatment domains, and 3) incorporating a loss term that spatially weights the lesion boundaries with greater emphasis in training. Using 425 patients (208 newly-diagnosed, 217 post-Tx, with 25 treated patients withheld as a test set) and a top-performing model previously trained on newly-diagnosed gliomas, we found that DCs increased by 10% (to 0.84) then plateaued after including ~25% of post-treatment patients in training. Transfer learning (pre-training on newly-diagnosed and finetuning with post-treatment data) significantly improved Hausdorf distances (HDs), a measure more sensitive to changes at the lesion boundaries, by 17% after including 26% post-treatment images in training, while DCs remained similar. Although modifying our loss functions with boundary-weighted penalizations resulted in comparable DCs to using standard DC loss, HD measures were further reduced by 26%, suggesting that HDs may be a more sensitive metric to subtle changes in segmentation accuracy than DCs. Current work is evaluating their utility in providing accurate volumes for real-time response assessment in the clinic using workflows that have recently been deployed on our clinical PACs system.