{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03003446578040374, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025451653221224863, 'mean_word_length': 5.13190896423595, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 3, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 1, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effects of rainfall, temperature and topography on malaria incidence in elimination targeted district of Ethiopia

Background Climate and environmental factors could be one of the primary factors that drive malaria transmission and it remains to challenge the malaria elimination efforts. Hence, this study was aimed to evaluate the effects of meteorological factors and topography on the incidence of malaria in the Boricha district in Sidama regional state of Ethiopia. Methods Malaria morbidity data recorded from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from all public health facilities of Boricha District in the Sidama regional state of Ethiopia. The monthly malaria cases, rainfall, and temperature (minimum, maximum, and average) were used to fit the ARIMA model to compute the malaria transmission dynamics and also to forecast future incidence. The effects of the meteorological variables and altitude were assessed with a negative binomial regression model using R version 4.0.0. Cross-correlation analysis was employed to compute the delayed effects of meteorological variables on malaria incidence. Results Temperature, rainfall, and elevation were the major determinants of malaria incidence in the study area. A regression model of previous monthly rainfall at lag 0 and Lag 2, monthly mean maximum temperature at lag 2 and Lag 3, and monthly mean minimum temperature at lag 3 were found as the best prediction model for monthly malaria incidence. Malaria cases at 1801–1900 m above sea level were 1.48 times more likely to occur than elevation ≥ 2000 m. Conclusions Meteorological factors and altitude were the major drivers of malaria incidence in the study area. Thus, evidence-based interventions tailored to each determinant are required to achieve the malaria elimination target of the country.


Background
The burden of malaria has been reduced globally due to the wide-range implementation of multiple interventions. The number of malaria cases and deaths had declined by 18% and 48% between 2000 and 2015. Similarly, the incidence and the mortality rate, both used the population growth into consideration, had declined by 37% and 60% in the same period. From 2000 to 2017 alone, 20 countries have eliminated malaria transmission and reported zero case for at least one year. These successful signs of progress of malaria control have prompted the worldwide possibility of malaria elimination. As a result, the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a global malaria elimination programme in 2015 intending to make a malaria-free world by 2030. Currently, the elimination programme is under implementation in many countries including Ethiopia [1][2][3][4].

Open Access
Malaria Journal *Correspondence: desalegndabaro2016@gmail.com Dabaro et al. Malar J (2021) 20:104 Notable progress has been made since the elimination programme was launched worldwide. Globally, the number of countries reporting below 10,000 cases and below 100 indigenous malaria cases increased from 40 to 49 and 17 to 27, respectively, from 2010 to 2018. From 2017 to 2018 alone, the number of countries reporting below 10 indigenous cases increased from 19 to 24. As a result, 19 countries had zero indigenous cases for 3 and above successive years from 2000 to 2018, while 4 countries, which were malaria endemic in 2015, attained malaria elimination. The burden of the disease has substantially declined in Africa, including Ethiopia, the continent most affected [1-3, 5, 6].
Climate change and geographical elevations are among the major factors affecting transmission and the geographical distribution of malaria. Meteorological variables, such as rainfall, temperature and humidity could impact the bionomics of malaria vectors, which could eventually determine malaria transmission intensity. Several studies reported the controversial association between climate change and malaria transmission [7][8][9].
Moreover, a higher elevation is another determinant of malaria incidence and transmission. As the altitude increases the temperature decreases and vice versa that in turn influences the transmission dynamics of the infection. Besides, the geographical shift of the Anopheles mosquito due to climate change facilitates malaria transmission in previously non-malaria areas, which results in an uneven distribution of the disease [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The effect of climate varies with different agro-ecological areas. Therefore, malaria prediction models using meteorological data vary from place to place thus only a single model could not fit for all geographical locations. Such inconsistencies of predictions are due to variations of risk factors of malaria incidence [17][18][19].
Ethiopia has unstable and highly seasonal malaria incidence with varying intensity of transmission depending on the climatic variations and geographical settings of the country [20]. Thus, the current study was aimed to investigate the impact of climate and elevations on malaria transmission in Boricha district, one of the malaria-endemic and elimination targeted districts in the country.

Study area and population
The study was conducted in Boricha district, in the Sidama regional state of Ethiopia; located at 304 km from the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. It covers a total area of 588.1 square kilometres. The altitude of the district ranges from 1001 to 2076 metres above sea level. The mean annual rainfall of the district ranges from 801 to 1000 mm, and the mean annual temperature ranges from 17.6 to 22.5 °C [21]. The district has 42 kebeles (the lowest administrative unit), 39 rural and 3 urban, and has a total populations of 325,161. Most of the population live in rural areas where agriculture is the mainstay of the community [22,23].
The district is one of the malaria-endemic districts in the region. Therefore, several interventions have been implemented to prevent and control the disease in addition to prompt diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis and treatment services have been given in both public and private health facilities. The public health facilities include one primary hospital, ten health centres, and thirty-nine health posts, and the private clinics including one non-governmental clinic, one medium clinic, five primary level clinics, three drug stores, and eleven drug vendors [23].

Study design
Retrospective malaria morbidity data were collected from health facilities to determine the association between meteorological variables and topography with malaria incidence over the last eight years (2010-2017) in Boricha district.

Source of information
The source of information was the malaria laboratory register logbooks at malaria diagnosis and treatment services providing health facilities in the district. The meteorological data of the district were obtained from the National Meteorological Agency (NMA) of the country [24].

Malaria diagnosis
In the study area, diagnosis of malaria was performed based on the national malaria guideline, which recommends both clinical and parasitological (laboratory) diagnosis of the disease in health facilities. A clinical diagnosis was performed based on the patient's history. However, a clinical diagnosis alone was not recommended except when there was no Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) or light microscopy in the health facilities. Parasitological (laboratory) diagnosis was performed using RDTs or light microscopy to confirm malaria parasites. Both thick and thin blood films were prepared to detect the malaria parasites. similarly, RDT was used in health posts to enhance malaria diagnosis at the periphery level [25].

Data collection techniques
In the current study, only laboratory-confirmed malaria cases were used. As a result, the laboratory registers of malaria morbidity were collected from all health facilities, which provide malaria diagnosis and treatment services.
From which, laboratory-confirmed malaria cases were obtained from one primary hospital, nine health centres, and thirty-seven health posts. The rest facilities were newly established and not fully equipped. As a result, it had been providing only the clinical diagnosis of malaria due to the absence of a light microscope and RDTs.
Meteorological data of the district, such as the minimum temperature, maximum temperature, average temperature, monthly rainfall were obtained from the NMA of Ethiopia [24]. The geographical coordinates of each kebele were recorded by geographical positioning system using Garmin eTrex 10 device. The data of kebele coordinates were collected by one trained data collector, where the location of the health facilities, mainly health post in each kebele was taken as a reference point of measurement.
The records of laboratory registers were collected by trained laboratory technicians using a standard format adapted from the national laboratory malaria register (logbook). Only the complete records, including the date (year and month) of diagnosis, address of the patients, age, sex, and the results of the diagnosis were included in the study. Incomplete records were excluded because each variable was required for analysis. Malaria reported from the study district only were used in the study, and the cases reported from out of the study area were also excluded. The year and month of the diagnosis were required to compute the trends and seasonality of malaria incidence. The address of the patients was required to link the cases with their specific residence, which was useful to understand the geographical variations of malaria distribution at several elevation levels. Age and sex were also analysed to understand the segments of the population more affected. The whole process, data retrieving and data entry in computer software were highly supervised to ensure completeness and consistency.

Data analysis
Data were entered using EpiData 3.1 and analysed using R version 4.0.0. Different statistical models were developed and used to predict the incidence and transmission patterns. Auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was used on monthly time series of malaria morbidity. The general linear model (GLM), negative binomial and Poisson regression, was used to compute the pattern of malaria distribution in the district. Auto-correlation Function (ACF) and partial autocorrelation function (PACF) of the residuals and the Ljung-Box Q test were used for the model adequacy checking. The upward trends of malaria transmission in the district, which could highly explained by the environmental factors, were determined using the ARIMA model.

Data quality control measures
Data collectors, supervisor and data entry clerks were trained on the objective and significance of the study. Also, data collectors and supervisor were trained about the data collection tools, and data entry clerks were trained about the data entry software (EpiData 3.1). In general, training was given for two days, one day for data collectors and supervisor, and one day for data entry clerks. The completeness and consistency of the data were strictly followed by the supervisor of the data collection. Also, the principal investigator has been following the whole process, such as completeness and consistency of collected data and entry software as well to enhance the quality of data.

Descriptive statistics of malaria
A total of 28,413 confirmed malaria cases were recorded over eight years, from 2010 to 2017 in the study area. From which, adults 15 years and above age category were 14,722 (51.8%) while children 5-14 years and < 5 years age groups were accounted for 6944 (24.4%) and 6,747 (23.8%), respectively. A relatively high proportion, 14,575 (51.3%) of cases were males. In general, malaria occurred in all months of the year throughout the study period where a minimum and maximum monthly case number was 3 and 859, respectively where the mean monthly case number was 296 (66.77%).

Time series plot of malaria
The time series plot of malaria cases shows a clear downward trend of malaria in eight consecutive years from 2010 to 2017. Here, successive observations (months) revealed a steady reduction of malaria incidence over the eight years. Besides, there was an identical pattern of trends of monthly malaria occurrence in each year indicating that the relative amplitude of seasonal changes was constant over time (Fig. 1a). Table 1 shows descriptive statistics of monthly recorded rainfall and temperature during the study period where a minimum and maximum amount of mean monthly rainfall was 0 and 238 mm, respectively. Similarly, the mean minimum and maximum values of monthly average temperature were 17.8 and 27.2 °C, respectively.

Time series plots of meteorological variables
The series plot of rainfall revealed that the amount of rain was somehow constant overtime with some heavy downpours observed in 2013. The amount of high rainfall in a given period did not cause an immediate increment of malaria incidence. In general, several peaks and fluctuations in the series plot indicate the seasonal dependency of rainfall in the study area. Similar to rainfall, temperature exhibits cyclic patterns of occurrence indicating a seasonal dependency (Fig. 1b, e).

Model comparison for malaria trend analysis
Four models were compared to analyse the nature of the trends describing malaria incidence. Accordingly, the   Log-quadratic model was the best fit model based on the selection criteria due to the lowest Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC) ( Table 2).
To investigate the effect of seasonality, the logarithmic transformed malaria incidence data were regressed on the quadratic trend and seasonal dummies. The results indicate that the model was significant at p < 0.05 level (F-statistic = 548.7, p < 0.0001, R-square = 98.94%; and adjusted R-square = 98.76%) ( Table 3).
To measure the monthly changes, the data of malaria cases were first transformed and then regressed on the square trend and monthly dummy variables. The month of November has approximately 5.774 more malaria cases than other months suggesting that it is the month in which the highest number of malaria cases occurred. The least number of malaria cases occurred in April and January ( Table 3).
The data were stationary (Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test, p = 0.01) time series. The results showed that the model that best fits the original data were ARIMA (2,1,2) (Table 4). Hence, the model for predicting future malaria case was Z t = X t − X t−1 and the model obtained was; ARIMA (2,1,2): X t = α 1 X t−1 + α 2 X t−2 + β 1 Z t−1 + β 2 Z t−2 + ǫ t ; where, α, and β are parameters and ǫ t is the residual term. The substituted estimates of the parameters obtained were; ARIMA (2,1,2): The final estimate of parameters for the model showed that the AR (1), AR (2), and MA (2) parameters had a p-value below 0.05, indicating a significant model parameter (Table 4).

Cross-correlation analysis of meteorological variables and malaria incidence
Cross-correlation analysis showed that minimum temperature, maximum temperature, average temperature and rainfall have significantly lagged correlations with malaria case occurrence (Fig. 2). Cross-correlation analysis of rainfall shows a positive correlation with malaria cases (Fig. 2d). A regression model on lag 6, 7, 12, 13, and 15 of previous monthly average temperature, lag 3 and 11 of previous monthly mean minimum temperature, lag 2 and 3 of previous monthly mean maximum temperature and lag 0, 2 and 8 of previous mean monthly rainfall were found as the best prediction model for monthly malaria incidence. The monthly mean minimum, mean maximum and average temperatures were the leading and monthly mean rainfall was the lagging variable of the monthly malaria incidence.
The auto-correlations and PACF do not exceed the significant bounds, which was good. Using the Ljung-Box test there was no significant (p = 0.9927) autocorrelations between successive forecasting errors. The Ljung-Box test yielded a p-value of more than 0.05 indicating that the model was free from serial correlation. The values were normal as they rest on a line and were not all over the place. All the graphs are in support of the assumption that there was no pattern in the residuals and hence calculated the forecast while the model residuals were homoscedastic (Fig. 3).
Forecasts (Fig. 4) based on an ARIMA (2,1,2) model in 2030 in November and December months, the malaria incidence were expected to be 88.367 and 88.281, respectively, which was approximately constant over all the year. The mean and variance for the malaria incidence were 1.17 and 5.17, respectively, with the ratio of variance to mean 4.40. The Poisson model is often criticized for its restrictive property that the conditional variance equals the conditional mean. Real-life data are often characterized by over dispersion that is the variance exceeds the   category were significantly associated with malaria incidence. November was more likely [exp (0.6977)] to have higher malaria incidence as compared to April. The least malaria incidence was recorded in April. For a unit increment of rainfall in millimetres the odds of malaria incidence increase by exp (0.0031249) = 1.003 (adjusted for the other variables), which implies that for a unit increment of rainfall malaria incidence increases by 0.3%. Elevation 1801-1900 m equals exp (0.3888692) = 1.475 (adjusted for the other variables), which implies that malaria incidence on elevation 1801-1900 m was 1.475 times more likely observed than elevation > 2000 m. For a unit increment of mean temperature, malaria incidence decreases [exp (-0.1263) = 0.88] by 11.86%. Malaria incidence in males was 1.11 times more likely than in females. Malaria incidence in the age group of 5-14 years was [exp (-0.7748)] 0.4608 times less likely than the age group of 15 and above years.
It is often interesting to compare these models in a statistical sense using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). In much literature reviewed that the models with the smallest AIC and BIC value is the better one and therefore, Negative Binomial regression model is responsible model to account for this data (Table 5).

Discussion
Globally, the burden of malaria is declining due to the intensive and wide range implementation of preventive and control measures, and many countries are heading to achieve the elimination goal by 2030. However, several factors could challenge and reverse or delay the success of the elimination programme [5,6]. In the current study, the effect of meteorological factors and altitude on malaria incidence was investigated. Accordingly, the finding revealed that rainfall, temperature, and elevation at the kebele/village levels were the major drivers of the disease.
In general, monthly rainfall and temperature at specific time lags had influenced the incidence of malaria. Rainfall had a positive correlation with malaria occurrences at lag 0 and lag 2 months. This indicated the increased risk of malaria transmission during the rainy time and when it gets lower at the end of the 2nd -month lag. Similar findings were also reported from different areas of the country and elsewhere in the world. A study in Kenya reported an increased incidence of malaria with 2-month lags of rainfall. A study in southwest Ethiopia reported that mean rainfall has a positive correlation with the malaria incidence at lag two to four months. Similarly, rainfall was a direct driver of malaria in Eritrea with various lag times (Lag 1, 2, 3, and 4) of the month. In addition, a strong correlation between rainfall and malaria transmission was reported from different geographical settings of Africa [19,26,27]. However, contrary, a negative association was reported from West Africa [16], whereas an insignificant association was reported from Ghana [28].
The lag effect of temperature was observed on the burden of malaria incidence in the current study. As a result, the minimum temperature showed a negative correlation with malaria incidence. A similar finding was reported from Ghana where minimum temperature lagged at three months was negatively correlated with malaria incidence. This could be due to the temperature that has a critical role in the regulation of growth, development, and survivor-ship of mosquito and malaria parasite, and also determines the period of the gonotrophic cycle. Hence, a minimum temperature could impede the development of mosquitoes' larvae and pupae. As a result, a minimum temperature could delay the infectiousness of mosquitoes and results in low malaria transmission [28].
In this study, the maximum temperature was also negatively correlated with malaria incidence. A similar finding was also reported from southwest Ethiopia, where the maximum temperature at several lags, Lag 0 to 4 months was negatively correlated with the malaria incidence. A negative association of temperature and malaria incidence was also reported from Western Ethiopia [16,19]. In contrast, others reported the positive correlation of temperature with malaria incidence. On the other hand, there was no association between monthly malaria incidence and mean maximum temperature in India. Besides, the influence of meteorological variables varies in different settings of the same country. For instance, rainfall, minimum, and maximum temperature showed a different correlation with malaria incidence in different regions of Ethiopia [29,30].
These findings depicted the complex and multi-factorial epidemiology of malaria, which in turn requires a thorough investigation of different approaches. Also, the meteorological factor is not the only factor influencing malaria incidences. Other factors such as land-use, land cover, water management, populations at risk, demographic and socioeconomic status of a community, poor hygiene, population movement, and activities exposing to infection and utilization of existing interventions could highly determine the transmission pattern. Besides, several models have been used in different studies thus the findings require precautions during interpretations [8,9,28,29,[31][32][33]. Therefore, further investigation of potential determinants of malaria transmission is highly recommended to device evidencebased intervention of malaria elimination.
Elevation has impacted the incidence of the disease. Thus, as altitude increased the burden of disease was decreased. As the altitude increase the temperature decrease, and vice versa that influences the incidence and transmission of infection [10][11][12]. In addition, the geographical shifts of the Anopheles mosquito due to climate change facilitate malaria transmission in previously nonmalarious areas [13,14], and the variation of the range of temperature influences the incidence and transmission of infection due to its direct effect on development and survivorship of vectors and malaria parasites [8]. Furthermore, altitude has an indirect effect on malaria transmission by determining temperature. As the altitude increase the temperature decrease, and vice versa that influences incidence and transmission [10][11][12].
The predictive tool was developed to forecast malaria incidence in the future, which is highly useful to track the pace of elimination for the reasonable allocation of a scarce resource. As a result, the ARIMA (2, 1, 2) model, the best fit model was used to predict the malaria incidence by 2030, the target year for malaria elimination. Accordingly, a point forecasts for the year 2030 shows that the number of malaria case will fluctuate around 88 per month, which is approximately constant throughout the year. This showed the probable reduction of malaria incidence and indicated whether the elimination goal would be achieved in a defined time or not.
Similarly, according to global modelling of malaria eradication trajectory for 2030 and 2050, the burden of malaria will increase in some parts of America and the Horn of Africa due to rising temperature and precipitation. In addition, as of the recent trajectory, expected global technical strategy milestones of malaria incidence set for 2020, 2025, and 2030 will not be achieved. This is because, given estimated 57 malaria incidence per 1000 population at risk in 2018, estimated malaria incidence in 2020, 2025, and 2030 would be 54, 48, and 42 instead of the required 34, 14, and 6 per 1000 population at risk, respectively, to meet the milestones of global technical strategy for malaria [4,6].
Although the malaria incidence has been declined in the past decades the number of cases from 2015 to 2017 warranted the possible resurgence of the disease. Besides, 2% more malaria case was reported in 2016 compared to 2015, which raised questions whether global malaria elimination programme could be attained on time or not [4,5]. Therefore, the prospect of malaria elimination requires more effort and attention than ever. Therefore, efficient and effective utilization of existing interventions, new alternative and complementary control intervention technologies/ tools, and allocating/mobilizing adequate resources is highly required to achieve the elimination goal during the defined period.
In this study, other meteorological parameters like relative humidity, the effect of malaria interventions and entomology information were not included, which is the limitation of the study in general and a prediction model in particular.

Conclusions
The findings of the present study showed a significant effect of rainfall and temperature on malaria incidence at several lags of the month. Rainfall was positively correlated with the malaria incidence while the temperature was negatively correlated. In addition, there was a variation of malaria distribution across different levels of geographical elevation. These were among the primary determinants of malaria incidence while other factors, such as malaria interventions and the abundance of malaria vectors could also influence the incidence of malaria. Therefore, a further study addressing such factors is required for further understanding and will be the next prior assignment in the study setting. Besides, equitable distribution and effective utilization of the existing malaria interventions are highly required to attain the elimination goal of the country.