{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03413654618473896, 'fraction_numerical': 0.019076305220883535, 'mean_word_length': 5.310126582278481, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Assessment of maximum isometric, isotonic and isokinetic leg extensor strength in young adult females.

For many years strength has been recognized as a major factor contributing to success in athletic performance. For this reason, the development and assessment of muscular strength have been of vital interest to athletes, exercise physiologists, and individuals involved in rehabilitation programs. However, much of the available literature has concentrated on the study of male subjects (5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 25, 26, 33, 34). A comparatively small number of studies have examined muscular strength in females (1, 23, 36). Conclusions derived from studies utilizing male subjects are often applied to female subjects without reservation. The basis for this practice is the assumption that male and female musculature exhibit similar strength characteristics (e.g., contractile properties, force velocity curves). However, a review of the literature would suggest this may not be a valid assumption.