{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023676880222841225, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016713091922005572, 'mean_word_length': 4.845528455284553, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparing BSEM and EUPD Estimates for Two-Group SB-MTMM Experiments

In 2018, two different approaches have been suggested to solve the estimation problems that have been detected during the analysis of the data of the two-group split ballot multi-trait multi-method (SB-MTMM experiments performed in many countries between 2002 and 2010 in the European Social Survey). One group suggested using the Bayesian estimation. The other group suggested a new estimation procedure (EUPD) that makes use of the pooled data across the different countries. In this note, we present a comparison of the results of the two approaches on the same generated data, which are comparable with the data that created problems in the ESS.