{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02336448598130841, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.3625, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pound and Eliot

Books about both authors’ adventures in the book trade stand out in this year’s array of scholarship. Reference works do, too: for Pound an Encyclopedia and for Eliot an annotated Waste Land suggest the extent to which the modernist era is receding into the distant past. That has not made their work less relevant; there is still a lot of explaining to do. Alec Marsh wrote on Pound, Elisabeth Däumer on Eliot.