{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0410958904109589, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01113013698630137, 'mean_word_length': 4.934010152284264, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reexamination of the Acid growth theory of auxin action.

Some crucial arguments against the acid growth theory of auxin action (U Kutschera, P Schopfer [1985] Planta 163: 483-493) have been reinvestigated by simultaneous measurements of proton fluxes and growth of maize (Zea mays L.) coleoptiles. Special care was taken to obtain a mild, effective, and reproducible abrasion of the cuticle. Proton secretion rates were determined in a computer-controlled pH-stat. In some experiments, equilibrium pH was measured. Growth rates were determined simultaneously in the same vessel using a transducer-type auxanometer. It was found that (a) the timing of auxin and fusicoccin-induced (FC) proton secretion and growth matches well, (b) the equilibrum external pHs in the presence of IAA and FC are lower than previously recorded and below the so-called ;threshold-pH,' (c) neutral or alkaline unbuffered solutions partially inhibit FC and IAA-induced growth in a similar manner, (d) the action of pH, FC, and IAA on growth are not additive. It is concluded that the acid-growth-theory correctly describes incidents taking place in the early phases of auxin-induced growth.