{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021141649048625793, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.181818181818182, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Structural patterns and hypertext rhetoric

Early hypertext theory viewed disorientation as a grave obstacle to effective hypertext, and often prescribed the used of simple, formal structures. The evolution of hypertext writing, especially literary hypertext, indicates that navigational anxiety may be misplaced. A rich vocabulary of structural motifs in current hypertext writing, spawning new efforts to understand, interpret, and represent complex hypertext structures.