{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028446389496717725, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006564551422319475, 'mean_word_length': 5.019736842105263, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Redeeming Eden: A Priestly Dialogue in Genesis–Leviticus

The Priestly compositions in Genesis–Leviticus turned away from the national vision, emphasizing wider filial connections with other kinship groups and, in effect, proposed that Eden could be redeemed as a sacred space. Yhwh is certainly the God of Israel, but the ancestors never knew that divine name. Combining an interpretation of Abraham as a non-Yahwist, a distinctive exodus account, cultic laws, and the social ethics of the Holiness Code, this paradigm provided hope for a renewed divine communion within which Yhwh may once again “walk about” among the people (Lev 26:11–12), even if the same Creator is known as Elohim or El by other nations. Instead of emerging from a royal court, the Priestly laws were promulgated by Moses in the desert, without the benefit of royal power or territory, and there is no conquest legislation in this material.