{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02061122956645345, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006396588486140725, 'mean_word_length': 5.592505854800937, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Our Essential and Endangered Dentist–Scientist Workforce

Future advances in dental medicine rely on a robust and stable pipeline of dentist–scientists who are dedicated to research inspired by the patients’ condition. The biomedical research community faces external and internal pressures that have been building over years. This is now threatening the current and future status of basic, translational and patient-oriented research by dentist–scientists who study dental, oral and craniofacial diseases, population sciences, and prevention. The dental academic, research and practicing communities can no longer ignore the warning signs of a system that is under considerable stress. Here, the authors report findings of the Physician–Scientist Workforce Working Group, charged by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director, to perform quantitative and qualitative analyses on dentist–scientists by addressing the size, composition and activities of the group, relative to other health professions. From 1999 to 2012, trends in the numbers of grant applications and awards to dentist–scientists point to an overall decline. Disturbing are the low numbers of new investigators who apply for Early Career NIH Programs. While more seasoned dentist researchers enjoy greater success, the average age of first-time funded dentists is 52.7 y for females and 54.6 y for males, with a relatively low number of applications submitted and funded. These new data led the panel to stress the need to expand the capacity of the dentist–scientist workforce to leverage technologies and research opportunities that benefit the profession at-large. Suggestions were made to invest in developing clinical research faculty, including those with foreign degrees, through new training mechanisms. The creation of new alliances between national organizations like the American Association for Dental Research, the American Dental Education Association and the American Dental Association will undoubtedly lead to bold and concerted actions that must be pursued with a sense of urgency. A more supportive culture within dental schools and universities for dentist–scientists is needed, as their success is critical to the future career choices of their mentees. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Advances in dental medicine rely on a pipeline of dentist–scientists who are dedicated to research inspired by the patients’ condition. Despite the recent advancement in technology and innovation, the dental community can no longer ignore the various pressures that threaten the future of the dentist–scientist profession. Here, the authors report findings of the Physician-Scientist Workforce Working Group of NIH that were published in 2014, and draw attention to the key issues threatening the NIH-funded pool of dentist–scientists.