{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016245487364620937, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0036101083032490976, 'mean_word_length': 4.994594594594594, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Adjustment of intellectually below-average men not identified as mentally retarded.

A study was made of the adjustment of adult persons who were intellectually belowaverage but had not been labelled as mentally retarded, with the aim of revealing any groups among them at potential risk of being labelled in the future. In connection with enlistment for military service, a sample of 19-year-old men of below-average intelligence and a control group of intellectually average men were selected. A cluster analysis of 22 adjustment variables in the intellectually below-average group gave four homogeneous clusters with respect to social and personal adjustment: A well-adjusted cluster, a personal problem cluster, a crime cluster and work problem cluster. The subjects of the crime cluster had grown up in big towns and their parents were registered in the files of the social welfare authoritis. Work problems had more frequently been preceded by problems at school. The crime cluster and the work problem cluster were considered to run the greatest risk of being labelled mentally retarded in the future.