{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03398409255242227, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022415039768618944, 'mean_word_length': 4.7907949790794975, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparison of Outcomes at Twelve Weeks of Traditional Button-Over-Nail versus Bone Anchor Repair of Zone I Flexor Digitorum Profundus Tendon Injury.

Background: The repair of zone 1 flexor tendon injury often relies on re-inserting the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon to the distal phalanx. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare outcomes at 12 weeks following traditional button-over-nail (BON) versus bone anchor (BA) repair of zone I FDP injury. Methods: Patients undergoing zone 1 FDP repair between April 2007 and September 2018 using a BON or a BA were included in the study. Patient demographics, complications, arc of flexion of distal (distal interphalangeal joint [DIPJ]) and proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) and patient-rated outcomes were analysed. Results: Forty-three patients were included in the study: 21 in the BA group and 22 in the BON group. Good function was achieved by 20 patients in BA versus nine in BON. Complications occurred in five BA patients versus 10 BON patients. Patients achieved a mean active DIPJ flexion of 49° and 31° and PIPJ flexion of 92° and 57° in the BA and BON groups, respectively. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates better arc of motion, patient-rated outcomes and lower complications at 12 weeks after surgery in patients undergoing zone 1 FDP repair using a BA. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).