{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030739045127534337, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.830357142857143, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
General practitioners and decision-making capacity assessment: the experiences and educational needs of New Zealand general practitioners.

BACKGROUND
Assessing decision-making capacity to health care is within the scope of practice for all doctors, yet the experience of GPs in this area is unknown.


OBJECTIVE
To explore the experiences, perspectives, approaches and challenges for GPs in New Zealand when conducting decision-making capacity assessments.


METHODS
Qualitative study design comprising individual in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted with a convenience sample of GPs. Interview transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis approach.


RESULTS
Twelve participants were recruited. The following themes emerged: (i) GPs' roles and responsibilities in decision-making capacity assessments; (ii) GPs lack formal training, knowledge, and confidence in decision-making capacity assessments; (iii) the legal interface of decision-making capacity assessments; (iv) GPs' relationships with specialists and the resulting impact on their confidence in decision-making capacity assessments; and (v) opportunities to improve GPs' knowledge and confidence in decision-making capacity assessments.


CONCLUSIONS
GPs take responsibility for decision-making capacity assessments; however, assessments can be complex. There is a need to develop specific curriculum and training resources for GPs to improve their clinical skills and legal knowledge in decision-making capacity assessments.