{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024356297842727904, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016005567153792623, 'mean_word_length': 4.917695473251029, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Compliance with the legal age limits for alcohol, tobacco and gambling – A comparative study on test purchasing in retail outlets

Abstract Aim: To assess whether retail outlets comply with the minimum legal age of 18 for the purchase of alcohol and tobacco and for gambling on slot machines in Finland. Methods: A test-purchase research in 117 retail outlets selling alcohol, tobacco and supplying slot machines in two towns. Five-hundred fifty-seven purchase attempts were made for alcohol (n = 173), tobacco (n = 177) and gambling on slot machines (n = 170) in private outlets and 37 attempts in government alcohol retail monopoly outlets. The differences in denial rates and factors of potential significance for denials were tested using logistic regression. Findings: The denial rate for gambling on slot machines was 4%. The odds that an alcohol or a tobacco purchase was denied were 25- and 20-fold, respectively, compared to gambling. The odds of denial of an alcohol purchase were 12-fold in alcohol monopoly stores compared to private outlets. Conclusion: The low compliance with the age limit for gambling is a challenge in a gambling policy system where slot machines are decentralized in private retail outlets and are widely available. The high denial rate in government alcohol retail monopoly outlets indicates that monopoly outlets are more capable of enforcing legal age limits effectively compared to private outlets.