{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010830324909747292, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.760975609756097, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
SPECIFIC FEATURES OF AMENDMENT AND CANCELLATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENT AND THE NEED FOR ITS IMPROVEMENT

The article provides a scientific and theoretical analysis of the procedures for amending, cancelling and invalidating an administrative document based on the experience of foreign countries and the current law of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The existing problems in the legislation and relevant aspects of their solution are disclosed when amending, cancelling or invalidating an administrative document. The experience of foreign countries has shown that various ways of amending, cancelling and invalidating an administrative document exist and are effectively used. A clear definition of these mechanisms makes it possible to resolve such disputes through a single procedure. This will avoid unnecessary spending of time and money of citizens, as well as save the resources of the state. Based on the legislation of foreign countries, the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan has developed proposals for specifying mechanisms for resolving administrative disputes, amending, cancelling and invalidating an administrative document, improving the procedure for applying the principle of trust protection. The implementation of these proposals in practice will contribute to the elimination of legal gaps in legislation and the establishment of unified legal mechanisms.