{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027932960893854747, 'fraction_numerical': 0.023743016759776536, 'mean_word_length': 4.736, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A higher standard for women

Gender Bias
Despite the absence of explicit gender bias among journal editors and reviewers, female economists were held to a higher standard in order to publish their work. Four leading economics journals shared data on nearly 30,000 manuscripts with Card et al. , who found that author gender did not influence key aspects of the evaluation process. However, when looking at future citations as a proxy for the quality of the research, female-authored papers received 25% more citations than similarly evaluated male-authored papers, suggesting that women needed to produce higher quality work than men in order for referees to recommend publication.

Quart. J. Econ. 135 , 269 (2020).