{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05907859078590786, 'fraction_numerical': 0.022764227642276424, 'mean_word_length': 5.072368421052632, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 1, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Helicobacter pylori proteomics by 2‐DE/MS, 1‐DE‐LC/MS and functional data mining

With its predicted proteome of 1550 proteins (data set Etalon) Helicobacter pylori 26695 represents a perfect model system of medium complexity for investigating basic questions in proteomics. We analyzed urea‐solubilized proteins by 2‐DE/MS (data set 2‐DE) and by 1‐DE‐LC/MS (Supprot); proteins insoluble in 9 M urea but solubilized by SDS (Pellet); proteins precipitating in the Sephadex layer at the application side of IEF (Sephadex) by 1‐DE‐LC/MS; and proteins precipitating close to the application side within the IEF gel by LC/MS (Startline). The experimental proteomics data of H. pylori comprising 567 proteins (protein coverage: 36.6%) were stored in the Proteome Database System for Microbial Research (http://www.mpiib‐berlin.mpg.de/2D‐PAGE/), which gives access to raw mass spectra (MALDI‐TOF/TOF) in T2D format, as well as to text files of peak lists. For data mining the protein mapping and comparison tool PROMPT (http://webclu.bio.wzw.tum.de/prompt/) was used. The percentage of proteins with transmembrane regions, relative to all proteins detected, was 0, 0.2, 0, 0.5, 3.8 and 6.3% for 2‐DE, Supprot, Startline, Sephadex, Pellet, and Etalon, respectively. 2‐DE does not separate membrane proteins because they are insoluble in 9 M urea/70 mM DTT and 2% CHAPS. SDS solubilizes a considerable portion of the urea‐insoluble proteins and makes them accessible for separation by SDS‐PAGE and LC. The 2‐DE/MS analysis with urea‐solubilized proteins and the 1‐DE‐LC/MS analysis with the urea‐insoluble protein fraction (Pellet) are complementary procedures in the pursuit of a complete proteome analysis. Access to the PROMPT‐generated diagrams in the Proteome Database allows the mining of experimental data with respect to other functional aspects.