{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024116815826660386, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01351860574658502, 'mean_word_length': 5.067733638182338, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of Inhibitor Concentration and Immersion Time on the Corrosion Rate and Inhibition Efficiency of AISI 1019 Steel in Inhibited Seawater Environment

The effect of inhibitor concentration and immersion time on the corrosion rate and inhibition efficiency of AISI 1019 steel in seawater environment were investigated by means of weight loss measurement (WLM) at an interval of 6days for a period of 60 days. AISI 1019 steel were immersed in seawater solution in the absence and presence of varying inhibitor concentrations of potassium chromate (PC), Sodium Nitrite (SN), Methyl Orange (MO), Methyl Red (MR), Terminalia Catappa Leaves (TCL) Extract, Carica papaya Leaves (CPL) Extract. The results showed that there is an increase in inhibition efficiency with increase in inhibitor concentration and decrease in inhibition efficiency with increase in immersion time. The inorganic inhibitor (potassium chromate), inorganic inhibitor (Sodium Nitrite), the organic Inhibitor (Methyl Orange), the organic inhibitor (Methyl Red), the green inhibitor (Terminalia Catappa Leaves) and green inhibitor (Carica Papaya Leaves) produced their best inhibition efficiency of 71.94%, 634%, 68.94%, 68.32%, 62.7%, 59.79% respectively at a concentration of 10g/L. From the result obtained, the potassium chromate inhibitor has better inhibitory property than other inhibitors, which revealed that it is best suited for inhibition of corrosion of mild steel in seawater environment.


Introduction
Corrosion is often referred to as metallic deterioration by chemical attack or reaction of a metal with its environment. [9]. Metallic corrosion is the passage of the metal into the chemically combined state. In other words, corrosion reactions cause metals to return to their natural ores. Aqueous Corrosion of any metal occurs by chemical reaction and by electrochemical mechanism. Corrosion may also be considered as a redox process in which an oxide coating is formed on the surface of the metal/alloy undergoing the process. It therefore requires oxygen and moisture to occur.
Corrosion is the transformation of metallic structures into other chemical structures, most often through the medium of a third structure, i.e., water. Often little or no corrosion would occur in the absence of water. It therefore requires oxygen and moisture to occur. Corrosion is in fact the "decay" of metals or alloy exposed to an aqueous environment. Corrosion of metals remains a universal scientific problem as it affects the metallurgical, chemical, food processing and oil Industries.
Corrosion inhibition is corrosion control by the addition of small quantities of chemical to an environment. Inhibitor function by lowering steady corrosion by reduction of metal loss in time and with time and also by extending the induction time for corrosion to commence [8].
Corrosion is a process not a property and it depends on a complex interaction between the material, its environment and the circumstances of exposure.
Considering the adverse effects of the damage caused by corrosion in various engineering field, there is the need to at least to retard the corrosion rate, if not to prevent it completely. The need for, and extent of corrosion control depends on the consequences of a failure [8]. An investigation into the subject of metallic corrosion is of immense industrial and academic concern and has thus received tangible interests throughout the years. The effect of immersion time and inhibitor concentration of Dill Seeds aqueous extract (DSAE) on the corrosion of C-steel in Red Sea Water was studied using chemical and electrochemical techniques [2]. It was found that the corrosion rate increases linearly with increasing immersion period although at a reduced rate due to the presence of Dill seeds aqueous extract (DSAE). The general corrosion processes of mild steel caused by the introduction of chloride ions and sulfate ions in simulated marine environment were studied by the measurements of open circuit potential (OCP), linear polarization resistance (LPR) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) methods [6]. OCP, LPR and EIS measurement results indicated that in simulated marine environment chloride ions had considerable influence on the passive film penetrate the corrosion product layer. Due to the corrosiveness of the marine environment and the susceptibility of carbon steel to corrosion, there is therefore the need to investigate the effect of inhibitor concentration and immersion time on the corrosion rate and inhibition efficiency of 0.19% C steel in seawater environment.

Materials
The material used in this research work is a mild steel substrate of 16mm diameter. The chemical analysis of this material were carried out at the Environmental Laboratory of the Energy Research Centre, University of Benin using a mass spectrometer analyzer. The result of the analysis is shown in Table 1.

Seawater
The seawater used was collected from NPA Warri. The purpose of seawater analysis is to define the concentrations of the ions that are present in the water. In this research, the instrument used in measuring the seawater parameter is the YSI 556 multi-parameter system. This instrument is ready-touse, handheld system placed in the sampling area for measurements of dissolved oxygen, salinity, conductivity, pH and temperature. The composition of the seawater is shown in Table 2.

Inhibitor
The inhibitors used include Inorganic inhibitor: Potassium Chromate (PC) and Sodium Nitrite (SN), Organic Inhibitor: Methyl Orange (MO) and Methyl Red (MR) and Green Inhibitor: Terminalia Catappa Leaves (TCL) Extract and Carica Papaya Leaves (CPL) extract.

Preparation of Mild Steel Sample
The 16mm diameter mild steel rod was machined into 85mm length of forty-three (43) samples each. These were utilized for this experiment. The cut edges of each of the test samples were smoothened by silica carbide abrasive paper (emery paper from grade #1000 to #1200). They were degreased in a solution of HCl with acid to water ratio of 1 to 4 for 30 minutes at room temperature. They were then dried in open air and with clean cloth and stored in moisture free desiccators with silica gel blue before the commencement of corrosion studies and experimentation.

Preparation of Green Inhibitor Solutions
In order to prepare the extracts, leaves from Terminalia Catappa (TCL) and Carica Papaya (CPL) were obtained in their fresh forms from the tree, washed and subjected to drying under aerated or ventilated cover. This was done to ensure that the natural constituents of the leaves were not debased. A Soxhlet extractor was used to extract the leaves. The extract from the plant in the thimble dissolves into the warm reflux of methanol solvent and then the stable or nonvolatile extracts dissolved in the solvent were placed in a thermostated water bath heated at 55°C to drive off any methanol solvent that might be with the extracts. The extracts were stored in Petri dishes and covered. Corrosion inhibition performance in plant extracts is due to the presence of surface active constituents which normally enhance the film formation over the metal surface, thus mitigating corrosion.

Preparation of Individual Organic and Inorganic
Inhibitor Solutions The preparation of the individual inhibitor was carried out by weighing 2g, 4g, 6g, 8g and 10g of Inorganic Inhibitor-Potassium Chromate (PC), Sodium Nitrite (SN), Organic Inhibitor-Methyl Orange (MO), Methyl Red (MR), Green Inhibitor-Terminalia Catappa leaves (TCL) and Carica Papaya leaves (CPL) using a sensitive digital analytical balance with accuracy to 0.0001 significant figures. These were dissolved in 500 cm 3 beaker containing Seawater and stirred for complete dissolution. They were transferred into a 1000cm 3 (1 liter) volumetric flask and more water added up to the 1000cm 3 mark to obtain concentrations of 2g/L, 4g/L, 6g/L, 8g/L and 10g/L of the inhibitor solution of PC, SN, MO and MR respectively. The percentages of the inhibitors in the prepared corrosive media are as follows: 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10% respectively.

Determination of Corrosion Rate from Weight Loss Measurement
The investigation involves periodic weight loss measurement. Pre-cleaned and pre-weighed samples were fully and separately immersed in forty-three plastic containers containing natural seawater solution and varying concentrations of the inorganic, organic, green inhibitors, and the synergistic admixtures for sixty days (1440 hours). The corrosion samples were removed from the corrosion environments (media) with the aid of a tong after which the samples were properly cleaned in distilled water and then dried with a cotton wool.
The dried samples were weighed with a digital weighing balance and the average weight recorded at regular intervals of six (6) days for the duration of 60 days. From the data obtained, the weight loss, the corrosion rates were calculated [5].
Where C. R CONTROL=The corrosion rate without inhibitor C. R INHIBITED=The corrosion rate in the presence of an inhibitor The inhibition efficiency is presented in Table 4.  Figure 1 show the variation of the Corrosion Penetration Rate (mm/yr.) against the Immersion time (hours) recorded for various concentrations of Potassium Chromate (PC) at 6 days' interval for 60 days.

Figure 1. Plot of Corrosion Rate (mmpy) against Immersion Time (hours) for Mild Steel in Seawater in the Presence of Varied Potassium Chromate Inhibitor.
From the graph, the corrosion rate decreases with increase in inhibitor concentration and decreases as the experiment progresses. The corrosion rate of mild steel in the control solution is almost twice as fast as the corrosion rate of the mild steel in the inhibited potassium chromate solutions.
The inhibitor solution with a concentration of 10g/L exhibits the lowest rate of corrosion of the mild steel while the inhibitor solution with a concentration of 2g/L exhibits the highest rate of the mild steel. Figure 2 show the variation of the Corrosion Penetration Rate (mm/yr.) against the Immersion time (hours) recorded for mild steel with various concentrations of Sodium Nitrite (SN) Inhibitor at 6 days' interval for 60 days.
As shown in the figure above, there is a marked decrease in the corrosion rate as the inhibitor concentration increases. The corrosion rate decreases as the immersion time increases. The trends reveal that the corrosion rate is lowest at the 10g/L inhibitor concentration and the corrosion rate is highest at the 2g/L inhibitor concentration. As obtained in the figure above there is a trivial difference recorded for the corrosion rates for 2g/L, 4g/L, and 6g/L concentrations. A significant decrease in corrosion rate occurs at a concentration of 8g/L and 10g/L. The corrosion rate also decreases with immersion time as more of the inhibitor is absorbed. Figure 4 show the variation of the Corrosion Penetration Rate (mm/yr.) against the Immersion time (hours) recorded for mild Steel in seawater for various concentrations of Methyl Red (MR) Inhibitor at 6 days' interval for 60 days.
The corrosion rate decreases with increase in inhibitor concentration and decreases as the experiment progresses. The corrosion rates at the 6th day for the 4g/L, 6g/L, 8g/L, and 10g/L inhibitor concentration are all below 0.1mm per year while that for the 2g/L concentration is about 0.12mm per year suggesting a high rate of corrosion for low inhibitor concentration. There is a substantial difference between the corrosion rate for the control (seawater) and the inhibited solutions.

Figure 5. Plot of Corrosion Rate (mmpy) against Immersion Time (hours) for Mild Steel in Seawater in the Presence of Varied Terminalia Catappa Leaves
Extract Inhibitor. Figure 5 show the variation of the Corrosion Penetration Rate (mm/yr.) against the Immersion time (hours) recorded for Mild Steel in Seawater for various concentrations of Terminalia Catappa Leaves (TCL) Extract commonly called "tropical almond" leaves extract Inhibitor at 6 days' interval for 60 days.
The corrosion rate is generally seen to decrease with inhibitor concentration and decrease as the experiment progresses The rate of corrosion of the mild steel is slightly reduced with the introduction of this inhibitor as compared to the selected inhibitor as the difference between the corrosion rate for the control and the inhibited solutions is small. The corrosion rate obtained at sixth day is greater than 0.1mm per year for all the concentration. At the 60th day, there is generally no effect of the corrosion inhibitor as the difference in corrosion rate for both control (seawater) and inhibitor solutions is negligible.

Figure 6. Plot of Corrosion Rate (mmpy) against Immersion Time (hours) for Mild Steel in Seawater in the Presence of Varied Carica Papaya Leaves (CPL)
Extract Inhibitor. Figure 6 show the variation of the Corrosion Penetration Rate (mm/yr.) against the Immersion time (hours) recorded for Mild Steel in Seawater for various concentrations of Carica Papaya Leaves (CPL) Extract commonly called "pawpaw tree" leaves extract Inhibitor at 6 days' interval for 60 days.
The graph demonstrates that at the 6th day, the rate of corrosion is higher than 0.10mm per year for all inhibitor concentrations while there is almost no effect of the inhibitor from the 60th day. There is decrease in corrosion rate as the inhibitor concentration increases. The corrosion rate decreases as the experiment progresses as a result of the inhibitor that has been fully absorbed and the formation of active protective film. Figure 7 show Inhibition efficiency of Potassium Chromate (PC) inhibitor on the corrosion of mild Steel in seawater at day 6 (144hours) with various Inhibitor concentrations.
The important finding from the figure above reveals that the inhibitor efficiency increased with increase in inhibitor concentration.
It is also visible that a substantial increase in the inhibitor efficiency is noticed at the inhibitor concentration of 8g/L and 10g/L. There is a little difference in inhibitor efficiency between the 2g/L inhibitor concentration and the 4g/L inhibitor concentration. Figure 8 show Inhibition efficiency of Potassium Chromate (PC) inhibitor on the corrosion of mild steel in seawater at day 60 (1440hours) with various Inhibitor concentrations.
There is a reduction in the inhibition efficiency at the 60th day. From the series, the inhibition efficiency is also seen to increase with inhibitor concentration. At the point of 8g/L and 10g/L, the inhibitor efficiency has a notable increase suggesting that the corrosion inhibitors molecules were fully absorbed on the surface of the mild steel thereby forming a protective film.    There is a general progressive increase in inhibitor efficiency as the inhibitor concentration increases. The sodium nitrite inhibitor efficiency is lesser compared to the potassium chromate inhibition efficiency.
Another important observation from the chart is that at 2g/L inhibitor concentration, there is already a noticeable inhibition efficiency.  There is a general progressive increase in inhibition efficiency as the inhibitor concentration increases. Observation at the 60th day demonstrates that sodium nitrite inhibitor shows a reduction in average inhibition efficiency of 447 percent compared to an average inhibition efficiency of 57.52 percent recorded for the sixth (6th) day.  It is observed that the inhibition efficiency increases with increase in inhibitor concentration. The organic inhibitor, methyl orange is shown to exhibit higher inhibition efficiency than the inorganic inhibitors suggesting superior inhibitory properties.
The difference in inhibition efficiency of the 8g/L concentration and 10g/L concentration is minute.  There is a general progressive increase in inhibition efficiency as the inhibition concentration increases. There is a decrease of inhibition efficiency at the 60th day.
Similarly, the organic inhibitor-methyl orange at day 60 exhibits a higher inhibition efficiency than the corresponding inorganic inhibitor of potassium chromate or sodium nitrite suggesting superior inhibitory properties.  The trend from the chart reveals that there is a progressive increase in the inhibition efficiency with increase in inhibitor concentration.
At a concentration of 2g/L, the methyl red inhibitor exhibits the highest inhibition efficiency. There is also higher inhibition efficiency at all inhibitor concentration in comparison to the inorganic inhibitors. This suggests that the organic inhibitor exhibits better inhibitory properties than the inorganic inhibitor of potassium chromate or sodium nitrite. Figure 14 show Inhibition efficiency of methyl red (MR) inhibitor on the corrosion of mild steel in seawater at day 60 (1440 hours) with various inhibitor concentrations.
There is a decrease in inhibition efficiency across immersion time from day 6 to day 60.
The chart trend reveals that there is increase in inhibition efficiency as the inhibition concentration increase from 2g/L to 8g/L. At day 60, the inhibitor efficiency is highest for the methyl red at the inhibitor concentration of 8g/L. Figure 15 show Inhibition efficiency of Terminalia Catappa Leaves (CPL) extract inhibitor on the corrosion of mild steel in seawater at day 6 (144 hours) with various inhibitor concentrations.
There is a general progressive increase in the inhibition efficiency with increase in inhibitor concentration. At the 6th day, the average inhibition efficiency for the Terminalia Catappa leaves extract inhibitor is 59.4 percent. This suggests an improved inhibition efficiency compared to sodium nitrite inhibitor. Figure 16 show Inhibition efficiency of Terminalia Catappa Leaves (CPL) extract inhibitor on the corrosion of mild steel in seawater at day 60 (1440hours) with various inhibitor concentrations.
From the chart trend, it is observed that there is a general progressive increase in the inhibition efficiency with increase in inhibitor concentration. There is also a decrease in inhibition efficiency through immersion time from day 6 to day 60.     There is a general progressive increase in the inhibition efficiency with increase in inhibitor concentration. At the 6th day, the average inhibition efficiency for the Carica papaya leaves extract inhibitor is 55 percent. This suggests a little above average performance and hence the lowest inhibition efficiency displayed among the corrosion inhibitors.

Figure 18. Chart showing variation of Inhibition Efficiency (%) against Inhibitor Concentration (g/L) of Carica Papaya leaves (CPL) Extract for Mild Steel in
Seawater at the 60th day. Figure 18 show Inhibition efficiency of Carica Papaya Leaves (CPL) extract inhibitor on the corrosion of mild steel in seawater at day 60 (1440 hours) with various inhibitor concentrations.
There is a general progressive increase in the inhibition efficiency with increase in inhibitor concentration. The inhibition efficiency decrease across immersion time from the 6th day to the 60th day. Table 3 showed the corrosion rate of mild steel in seawater in the presence of varying concentration of selected inhibitors for a 60 days' immersion period.

Results presented in
It shows that the corrosion rate of the control solution (solution without inhibitor) increases linearly with immersion time as seen in Figure 1 to Figure 6, indicating that seawater is highly corrosive under studied conditions. These results are in agreement with previous studies on the corrosion of carbon steel in the Red Sea carried out by Aisha [2].
Looking through the plot presented in Figure 1, the corrosion rate decreases with increasing Inhibitor concentration level while the corrosion rate increases as the period of immersion increases. It is a general trend that the aggressiveness of the sea water reduces with increase in the inhibitor concentration level. This is also depicted clearly in Figure 2 to Figure 6.
As shown in the Figures, the inhibitors do not stop corrosion but delays the onset of corrosion thereby leading to decrease in the corrosion rate. Comparing the graphs in the figures, it could be seen clearly that the corrosion rates for the uninhibited corrosive medium (control solution) is very high and lowest in the medium with 10g/L inhibitor concentration. These findings are in agreement with studies made on the effect of sodium nitrite on the inhibition of carbon steel in seawater investigated using the weight loss method [3].
The reason for this phenomenon can be attributed to the protective film formed by the inhibitor on the metal surface which is broken by the aggressive chloride ions present in the sea water and the corrosion rate increases as the experiment progresses until there is formation of corrosion product. This corrosion product formed is not strictly passivating as it acts as a film, especially in the presence of aggressive ions such as the chloride ions. If the chloride ions are present in the aqueous phase, it can penetrate the corrosion product layer and corrode the steel although at reduced rate due to the presence of the corrosion inhibitor [6].
It takes a much longer time to reach a steady state which is