{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03262642740619902, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00897226753670473, 'mean_word_length': 5.704918032786885, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Predictors of Sun-Related Behaviors Among Young Women: Comparisons Between Outdoor Tanners, Fake Tanners, and Tan Avoiders

Abstract Objective: Skin cancer incidence continues to rise as a tanned appearance remains desirable, particularly among young women. Fake tanning provides a tanned appearance without exposure to ultraviolet radiation. In order to advance our understanding of the factors that contribute to long-term behavior change, this study explores determinants associated with different types of tanning. Participants: The sample included 162 female students from the University of Adelaide, Australia, aged 18–26 years. Data were collected in July 2010. Methods: The current study measured differences in skin type, skin cancer knowledge, unrealistic optimism, appearance motivation, and sun-protective and sun exposure behaviors amongst outdoor tanners, fake tanners, and tan avoiders through an online survey. Results: Differences were observed for skin type, skin cancer knowledge, unrealistic optimism, sun protection, and sun exposure. Conclusions: A “one-size-fits-all” approach to skin cancer prevention may not be appropriate; type of tanning behavior may need to be considered in health promotion work.