{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.007662835249042145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.620253164556962, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The usage of subjective temporal phrases within the national curriculum for history and its schemes of work

This article critically considers the National Curriculum for History and its Schemes of Work's usage of subjective and conventional temporal phrases. In light of the findings from a current research study it examines whether the employment ofsubjective temporal phrases as a replacement for conventional dating systems misses a valuable opportunity to develop primary aged children's concepts of historical time.