{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0221483942414175, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015503875968992248, 'mean_word_length': 4.7215189873417724, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Thank You to Our 2019 Reviewers

Science operates best by sharing accurate new knowledge in clear ways. In order to check our assumptions, our methods, and our interpretations of the observations, experiments, analyses, and calculations that we do, we ask experts who were not involved in the study to critically evaluate our work. We call this peer review. They look for completeness, accuracy, whether work is new, and how clearly we have written the descriptions. We continue to be humbled by the time, effort, and careful insights that our colleagues share with each other through the process of peer review. In 2019, Radio Science benefited from 620 reviews provided by 373 of our peers for papers submitted to the journal. Thank you all for your efforts toward advancing radio science now and for the future. Individuals in italics provided three or more reviews for Radio Science during the year.