{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01645021645021645, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.838383838383838, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On the Reception and Reinterpretation of Rationality in the Field

Abstract Rationality is a core concept in contemporary theory and praxis of public administration. Yet, it has a specific history in the field. According to the standard story the roots of rationality can be traced back to the works of Taylor, Weber and Fayol. These authors are at the origin of the so-called rational paradigm. This paradigm and hence the works of Taylor, Weber and Fayol is said to express a specific meaning of rationality: efficiency. In this article, the author makes the case that a critical attitude is needed towards common interpretations of the works of these fountainheads in the rational paradigm. A comparison between a reading of the original sources and contemporary receptions shows it is not the definition of rationality of Taylor, Weber, and Fayol themselves that has taken the lead in the discussion, but some other definition that is applied to their works afterwards. The concern of these authors is much broader than is commonly acknowledged and-ironically-one might even criticize the rational paradigm with the help of the works of these authors.