{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03526448362720403, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02686817800167926, 'mean_word_length': 5.176165803108808, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Another Contribution to Estimating Success in Graduate School: a Search for Sex Differences and Comparison Between three Degree Types

THE literature of academic prediction in graduate education is filled with studies demonstrating correlations of various selection devices and grade point averages. The favorite devices are of course the Graduate Record Examination and the Miller Analogies Test. Results using these tests have certainly been unpredictable with reported validities ranging from .08 for the GRE-Verbal (Newman, 1968) to .47 for the GRE-Quantitative (Law, 1960). MAT validities ranging from .00 (Travers, 1948) to .6,9 (Gustad, 1950) have also been noted. Studies have yielded more supportive evidence for the MAT, with validities in the mid .20’s and .30’s. (e.g. Payne and Tuttle, 1966). Those concerned with selection in colleges of education will, however, find few readily available data on the potentially applicable and useful National Teacher Examinations. To describe comparative validities between these three instruments was one of the purposes of the present investigation. In addition, since most predictive studies tend to focus on masters or doctoral students,