{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015476190476190477, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0035714285714285713, 'mean_word_length': 6.6454545454545455, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Symmetricality and Complementarity and Their Relationship to Marital Stability

Bateson's concepts of symmetricality and complementarity in dyads were operationalized via the development of the Symmetrical-Complementary Relationship Scale (SCRS). The relationship of symmetricality and complementarity to marital stability was assessed in a sample of 136 intact married couples. Contrary to predictions drawn from Bateson's conceptualizations, symmetrical couples reported a significantly higher level of marital stability than complementary couples. However, when marital satisfaction was statistically controlled, the relationship between symmetricality and complementarity and marital stability was not maintained. The results affirm the need for continuing empirical examination of Batesonian propositions about marital and family life.