{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0314026517794836, 'fraction_numerical': 0.026517794836008374, 'mean_word_length': 4.925619834710743, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Dynamic of Political Leadership: From Transitive System to Stable Regime

The paper investigates the dynamic of leadership in the transitional period of political system in comparison with the type of leadership in stable political regime. In this paper, the regional focus of post-Soviet Russia was used. The research task was to find out how the type of regional leader had changed in 26 years. We studied the official biographies of all heads of administrations of the Siberian regions from 1991 to 2017, the Siberian leaders' memoirs and expert assessments. Periods from 1991 to 2017 were divided into stages. The electoral cycles (until 2005, 2013 - 2017) and the appointment cycles (from 2005 to 2012) were used as the basis for separating the stages. At each of these stages, we estimated such characteristics as — age (at the time of appointment and by the end of the period/term); — education (what kind of speciality was received, whether the training was received internally or in absentia, whether the person in question had a degree, whether they received additional education, whether they passed refresher courses (courses of professional development)); — career traffic (from what sphere the person in question came, from what position he was appointed or elected to the post of the head of the region); — membership in parties (a member of which parties they were); — political beliefs, inclinations and preferences.