{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018642803877703208, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0037285607755406414, 'mean_word_length': 5.390476190476191, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Impact of Brine Chemistry on Waterflood Oil Recovery: Experimental Evaluation and Recovery Mechanisms


 Water floods are typically conducted using the least expensive, easily available, non-damaging brine. Very little attention is given to the possibility of changing brine composition to improve oil recovery. Over the last 20 years, there has been laboratory and field trial evidence that shows changing brine chemistry, especially to low salinity, can sometimes increase the recovery. The various mechanisms of additional oil recovery from changing brine chemistry are not entirely clear. We report here on the effect of using low salinity and divalent altered brines on oil recovery through a variety of laboratory methods and materials. More than twenty corefloods were conducted to evaluate the effect of brine chemistry and initial wettability on incremental oil recovery. We also performed phase behavior tests, contact angle measurements, and wettability index measurements to evaluate recovery mechanisms. Initial wettability of the core was altered by ageing it with different crude oil containing wide range of asphaltene content. The core flood with lowest wettability index (least water-wet) produced about 12% incremental recovery while the most water-wet core only produced ∼ 4% during the secondary low salinity waterflood.