{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0273109243697479, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0035014005602240898, 'mean_word_length': 5.436936936936937, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hypergraph partitioning with fixed vertices [VLSI CAD]

We empirically assess the implications of fixed terminals for hypergraph partitioning heuristics. Our experimental testbed incorporates a leading-edge multilevel hypergraph partitioner and IBM-internal circuits that have recently been released as part of the ISPD-98 Benchmark Suite. We find that the presence of fixed terminals can make a partitioning instance considerably easier (possibly to the point of being "trivial"); much less effort is needed to stably reach solution qualities that are near best-achievable. Toward development of partitioning heuristics specific to the fixed-terminals regime, we study the pass statistics of flat FM-based partitioning heuristics. Our data suggest that more fixed terminals implies that the improvements within a pass will more likely occur near the beginning of the pass. Restricting the length of passes-which degrades solution quality in the classic (free-hypergraph) context-is relatively safe for the fixed-terminals regime and considerably reduces the run times of our FM-based heuristic implementations. The distinct nature of partitioning in the fixed-terminals regime has deep implications: (1) for the design and use of partitioners in top-down placement; (2) for the context in which VLSI hypergraph partitioning research is pursued; and (3) for the development of new benchmark instances for the research community.