{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020202020202020204, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.547169811320755, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Linguistic Annotation of Two Prosodic Databases

Two prosodic databases were annotated with linguistic information using SGML (Standard General Markup Language), one database of American English and one of Modern Standard German. Only information that might have prosodic correlates was annotated. Pho-netic and morphological information was supplied by automatic tools and then hand corrected. Semantic and pragmatic information was inserted by hand. The SGML tagset is essentially the same for both languages. Tags delimit structural units, all other information is supplied by attributes. The databases themselves , which combine linguistic and phonetic information, are stored as SPSS les.