{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013100436681222707, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.198198198198198, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Technologies for the formation of criminal procedural evidence

The article analyzes a concept that is fashionable in the modern Russian theory of criminal procedural evidence and explains the patterns of formation of criminal procedural evidence as a means of proof. One of the main such patterns, according to the author, is the relationship of a certain technology for the formation of evidence with the type of prosecution. The investigative form of bringing forward a public, as well as a private-public accusation, determines the investigative technology of proof. The transition to an accusatory system will make the technology of forming evidence in a criminal court adversarial.