{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029461756373937678, 'fraction_numerical': 0.017563739376770537, 'mean_word_length': 5.196491228070175, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Multi-institutional variation in performance of low dose computerized tomography for the evaluation of suspected nephrolithiasis.

Introduction and Objective Guidelines from the American Urological Association (AUA) and American College of Radiology (ACR) recommend that patients with suspected nephrolithiasis undergo low dose computerized tomography (LD CT KUB) as opposed to higher dose conventional imaging. We hypothesized that even at institutions with established LD protocols, higher dose imaging is common. Methods We identified four academic medical centers where LD CT KUB protocols were implemented to yield an Effective Dose (EDose) consistent with national guidelines. Fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent CT KUB specifically for the evaluation of nephrolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed at each site. Patient age, sex, BMI, imaging location, and EDose (millisieverts, mSv) were recorded. Results 200 patients with a mean age of 54 years were identified. 46 patients (23%) underwent CT KUB with EDose ≤ 4 mSv, accounting for 10-48% of each institution's cohort. 116 patients had a BMI < 30, and would have been expected to receive LD CTs by the AUA criteria for LD CT KUB. Within this subset, only 37 patients (32%) actually underwent LD CT KUB. The highest dose CT KUB at each institution resulted in EDose of 33.8-44.6 mSv, exceeding the recommended exposure of LD CT KUB by tenfold. Conclusions At academic institutions where LD CT KUB was implemented for the evaluation of nephrolithiasis, a minority of patients with BMI < 30 receive guideline-concordant imaging. Differences in patient BMI did not account for the variation in radiation exposure. Further research is necessary to elucidate barriers to low dose CT implementation.