{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04133430021754895, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016678752719361856, 'mean_word_length': 4.92274678111588, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of G-suit protection on carotid-cardiac baroreflex function.

INTRODUCTION
To test the hypothesis that G-suit inflation could increase cardiac chronotropic responses to baroreceptor stimulation and enhance baroreflex buffering of BP, the carotid-cardiac baroreflex response of 12 subjects was measured across two levels of lower body negative pressure (LBNP = 0 and 50 mm Hg) and two levels of G-suit inflation (0 and 50 mm Hg) in random order.


METHODS
Carotid-cardiac baroreflex stimulation was delivered via a silastic neck pressure cuff and responsiveness quantified by determination of the maximum slope of the stimulus-response function between R-R intervals (ms) and their respective carotid distending pressures (mmHg).


RESULTS
Mean +/- SE baseline control baroreflex responsiveness was 3.8+/-0.4 ms x mm Hg(-1). LBNP reduced the baroreflex response to 2.7+/-0.4 ms x mm Hg(-1), but G-suit inflation with LBNP restored the baroreflex response to 4.3+/-0.6 ms x mm Hg(-1).


CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that, in addition to increased venous return and elevated peripheral resistance, G-suit inflation may provide protection against the debilitating effects of blood distribution to the lower extremities during orthostatic challenges such as standing or high +Gz acceleration by increasing cardiovascular responsiveness to carotid baroreceptor stimulation.