{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04676971858898137, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0372572334522394, 'mean_word_length': 5.15609756097561, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Petrogenesis and tectonic evolution of the Palaeozoic to Mesozoic Niuxinshan granitoids in the North Qilian orogen, NW China

Numerous granitoid suites exposed in the Qilian orogen, NE Tibetan Plateau preserve important records of the tectonic evolution of this orogen. Here we present zircon U–Pb, zircon rare earth elements (REEs), and whole‐rock geochemical and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic data on Niuxinshan granitoids in the North Qilian orogen, with a view to constrain their petrogenesis and timing of emplacement, as well as to gain new insights into the Early Palaeozoic tectonic evolution of the Qilian orogen. Zircon U–Pb data show multiple concordant ages of ~517, 455–425, 397–389, and 351–319 Ma for syenogranite, and ages of ~758 and 724 Ma together with some scattered Early Mesozoic discordant ages for porphyritic granite, suggesting episodic magmatism from Neoproterozoic to Early Mesozoic. Zircon ∑REEs range from 276.43 to 4,582.32 ppm, and are characterized by depletion of light REEs (LREEs) and enrichment heavy REEs (HREEs) with negative Eu anomalies, indicating a mixture of magmatic and hydrothermal zircons. Whole‐rock geochemical data show similar variation of LREEs, large‐ion lithophile elements (LILEs), HREEs, and high‐field‐strength elements (HFSEs) with zircon REEs, with Eu, Ba, P, and Ti negative anomalies and Rb, U, and Pb positive anomalies. Based on their formation ages, two groups of granitoids are identified. Group I rocks (Early Palaeozoic) are represented by I‐type granites whereas Group II rocks (Early Mesozoic) are of S‐type. Whole‐rock Sr–Nd–Hf isotopes display (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios of 0.707085–0.709591, εNd(t) values of −5.3 to −2.3, εHf(t) values of −2.2 to 0, and two‐stage model (Nd and Hf) ages of 1.6–1.4 Ga for Group I rocks, and of 0.728156–0.734113, −9.4 to −9.3, −10.6 to −6.9, and 2.1–1.9 Ga for Group II rocks. Accordingly, we infer that the magma for Group I was sourced from the partial melting of basaltic protoliths in the mafic lower crust and underwent fractional crystallization. Group II was derived from metasedimentary protoliths through reworking of ancient Palaeoproterozoic crustal components. Integrating the results from this study with those from previous studies on Niuxinshan granitoids, we argue that the southward subduction model of the North Qilian Ocean beneath the Qilian Block during the Early Palaeozoic might be a more reasonable scenario. However, the Early Mesozoic magmatic event reported here remains equivocal in the North Qilian orogen.