{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019348268839103868, 'fraction_numerical': 0.014256619144602852, 'mean_word_length': 4.921686746987952, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Institutions for Global Justice

In December 2003, the members of the European Union (EU) met in Brussels for a summit that had the potential to become a turning point in history.I The agenda for the meeting was to adopt a constitution for Europe in the wake of the European enlargement scheduled for May 2004. However, European nations were not able to resolve their differences over undecided issues such as voting, foreign policy decision-making, budget deficit rules, and whether to mention God in the constitution. The most severe disagreements occurred over the voting system proposed by the draft constitution, which envisioned a move towards population-adjusted voting rights. In the old arrangements agreed upon in Nice in 2000, members had roughly the same amount of votes independent of population. In contrast, the new system would require a favourable vote from half of the members containing 60 per cent of the Union's population, thus amounting to a loss of votes for