{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02022058823529412, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003676470588235294, 'mean_word_length': 5.294797687861272, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Young dual citizens- people of 'the third space'?

context. Formal issues concerning individuals’ juridical (equal) status and informal definitions of belonging and identity combine in ideas of citizenship, forming a mixture that is quite difficult to penetrate for analysis. Recently topics of both political and social scientific concern have focused on terms of participation and societal membership. There has been a lot of discussion about how the premises of equality included in ideas of citizenship become actualised in people’s lives if they do become realised at all. Many accounts in the field of youth research have shown that especially young people see themselves being ignored or marginalised as far as equal membership in, for example, societal decision-making (see Helve 1998). Does the position of dual citizenship membership of two states marginalise young people even to a greater extent, or does it perhaps create some extra possibilities in social affiliation and societal membership? Citizenship is an issue connected with mediation between individual and state. To