{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03386454183266932, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.568627450980392, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Disciplining the Sciences in Conflict Zones: Pre-Classical Mechanics between the Sovereign State and the Reformed Catholic Religion

Traditionally, the early modern period is characterized by a process
 whereby religion, politics, and science are gradually separated into
 independent cultural spheres. This account conceives of the process of
 modernity in terms of ‘total conflicts’ between abstract institutions (‘the
 state’, the ‘Church’, ‘science’), stemming from the demand for freedom of
 each of these institutions to determine their own norms of behaviour and
 thought within their own boundaries. The account I offer, in contrast,
 emphasizes the centrality of the rise of ‘sovereign’ states enhancing the
 creation of specific networks of interdependencies between rulers, the
 carriers of religion, and professional artists and scientists. However,
 interdependence also entailed ‘conflict zones’, where boundary work
 between political, religious, and scientific discourses was carried out.