{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026066350710900472, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0071090047393364926, 'mean_word_length': 4.70945945945946, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Latent Learning in Satiated and Food-Deprived Rats

The hypothesis that qualitatively different learning occurs during exploration by satiated and food-deprived rats was tested in a latent learning paradigm. Satiated and 48-hr. food-deprived rats were allowed unrewarded exploration in one of two complex mazes—one maze with and one without blind alleys. Later, these four groups (ns =12) were compared with four groups (ns = 12) of similarly deprived controls in learning a path to a food reward in the mazes. The satiated rats showed a latent learning effect in both mazes, but only in the later trials. The food-deprived rats showed a latent learning effect only in the non-blind alley maze. The results are interpreted as indicating only a general adaptation effect by the deprived rats but some specific maze learning by the satiated rats.