{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.055303030303030305, 'fraction_numerical': 0.04128787878787879, 'mean_word_length': 4.6191489361702125, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 4, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Is it possible to predict mortality and recurrence of VT afterablation? PAINESD risk score applicability vs new predictors


 
 
 Type of funding sources: None.
 
 
 
 Catheter ablation (CA) prevents ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrences in patients (pts) with structural heart disease (SHD), and might have a favorable outcome, but is associated with severe short-term complications. Identification of pts at high risk of periprocedural acute haemodynamic decompensation has important implications at procedural planning.
 The PAINESD risk score is a promising tool to predict VT ablation procedure-related mortality.
 
 
 
 To evaluate the accuracy of the PAINESD risk score to predict short-term mortality after structural VT ablation and to compare it with other conventional clinical predictors.
 
 
 
 Prospective, observational, single-centre study of consecutive pts with SHD (ischemic or nonischemic), referred for VT-CA. High-density substrate maps were collected, through endocardial, epicardial or combined endo-epicardial approaches according to clinical data and operator preference. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality or hemodynamic decompensation. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify relevant clinical predictors and to compare them with the PAINESD risk score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate predictors of 30-day mortality.
 
 
 
 A total of 102 pts with SHD referred for VT ablation were evaluated(mean age: 67±11 years, 94% male, 78.4% in NYHA class I-II; mean LVEF was 34±11%). The baseline PAINESD risk score was 12.39±5.8, 19.6% at low risk, 36.3% at intermediate risk and 27.5% at high risk of adverse events. Overall 30-day mortality was 4.9%. The PAINESD did not predict 30-days mortality or hemodynamic decompensation (p= 0.93). Indeed, a non- significant trend to higher short and long-term mortality was noticed in high-risk score pts – Figure 1. On univariate analysis age>65 years (p=0.019), LVEF <35% (p=0.049), body mass index<28kg/m2 (p=0.019), CKD (p=0.001) and previous VT ablation (p=0.022) were prognostic predictors. On multivariate analysis, only LVEF<35% (HR2.225; CI95% 1.004-4-774,p=0.038) and CKD (HR 3.35; CI95%: 1.31-8.51, p=0.011) were independent predictors of short-term prognosis.
 
 
 
 In our population, LVEF<35% and CKD were the strongest predictors of short-term mortality. PAINESD risk score was not accurate in predicting adverse events. New score systems must be derived for prognostic stratification in this population, incorporating the reduction on the actual short-term event rates after VT ablation.
