{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019417475728155338, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.320754716981132, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Christology in the Context of Experience: On the Interpretation of Christ by E. Schillebeeckx

M AKING A CRITICAL JUDGMENT of Schillebeeckx's Christology is difficult. He has not dealt with it in a comprehensive and formal manner, but rather in association with other topics or under certain restricted aspects. Secondly, his remarks on Christology are only partially systematic in character, being marked by a methodological pluralism which includes exegetical, dogmatic, and empirically descriptive methods. This pluralism does not make for the desired comprehensive presentation; it can blur ideally distinct, though not separate, aspects and dimensions, and this can prevent the attainment in turn of all the truth accessible to any one of the given methods, rigorously pursued. Finally, there are certain divergences among the author's many scattered statements over the years in which a critical reader might see contradictions but which the author presents as the continuous development of a single, constant, and valid basic thought. If one were to try to bring these statements into some sort of unity, one could single out the dimension of experience, especially in the more recently formulated positions. The author is primarily seeking an interpretation of Christ which stems from present experience and aims at new experience.