{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013043478260869565, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.492957746478873, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
SUPPORTING ARGUMENT IN E-DEMOCRACY

Methods of argument representation can be exploited in systems for edemocracy. In this paper we discuss a particular method of argument representation, known as an argumentation scheme, and some issues concerning the relations between arguments represented using such schemes. We show how this method of argument representation has been implemented in a practical system designed for the public to critique policy proposals.