{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027149321266968326, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02262443438914027, 'mean_word_length': 5.413043478260869, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Romanticism on the Right: Benjamin Disraeli's Authoritarian Aesthetics

Abstract:This essay turns an undisciplining lens on Benjamin Disraeli, the prime minister of Britain in 1868 and again from 1874 to 1880. I argue that some of his novels operate within a tradition of deeply conservative aesthetics, celebrating authoritarian models. I focus on Coningsby (1844) and Tancred (1847) to argue that they belong to a long Romanticism, opposing moves toward democracy, reason, and utilitarianism, and espousing values of beauty, passion, and eroticism toward authoritarian ends. Though Disraeli's conservative politics have often been localized as a part of the contest between the Whigs and the Tories, his novels offer a surprising template for a long-lived set of ideas, anticipating more virulent strains of hard-right thought and practice that would arise in the twentieth century.