{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027777777777777776, 'fraction_numerical': 0.020202020202020204, 'mean_word_length': 5.11969111969112, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Experience with intranasal zolmitriptan in cluster headache].

INTRODUCTION
The objective is to analyse our experience with the new intranasal formulation of zolmitriptan 5 mg in the symptomatic treatment of cluster headache in daily clinical practice.


PATIENTS AND METHODS
We collected a total of 18 patients with cluster headache and experience with intranasal zolmitriptan; 17 had used subcutaneous sumatriptan and 8 oral triptans. The main reasons for trying intranasal zolmitriptan were: poor tolerability in 12 patients and insufficient efficacy in 6.


RESULTS
Among the 17 patients experienced in subcutaneous sumatriptan, 12 (71 %) preferred nasal zolmitriptan, 2 (18 %) subcutaneous sumatriptan and 2 (12 %) did not express any preference. The reasons for preferring intranasal zolmitriptan were: higher convenience (n = 6), better tolerability (n = 5), lower price (n = 2) and higher efficacy (n = 1). Seven out of the 8 patients who had taken oral triptans preferred nasal zolmitriptan, in all cases due to higher subjective efficacy. A total of 11 patients showed efficacy within 30 minutes. Only 3 patients referred to adverse events, always mild.


CONCLUSIONS
The 5 mg nasal formulation of zolmitriptan is a potential new option for the symptomatic treatment of cluster headache. This formulation should be considered in patients with poor tolerability to subcutaneous sumatriptan and in those attacks where quick access to inhaled oxygen is not possible. These results suggest that a controlled trial with nasal zolmitriptan in this indication would be worthwhile.