{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.039755351681957186, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0030581039755351682, 'mean_word_length': 5.099378881987578, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The “One-fifth Rule” with Rollbacks for Self-Adjustment of the Population Size in the (1 + (λ,λ)) Genetic Algorithm

Self-adjustment of parameters can significantly improve the performance of evolutionary algorithms. A notable example is the (1 + (λ,λ)) genetic algorithm, where adaptation of the population size helps to achieve the linear running time on the OneMax problem. However, on problems which interfere with the assumptions behind the self-adjustment procedure, its usage can lead to the performance degradation. In particular, this is the case with the “one-fifth rule” on problems with weak fitness-distance correlation.We propose a modification of the “one-fifth rule” in order to have less negative impact on the performance in the cases where the original rule is destructive. Our modification, while still yielding a provable linear runtime on OneMax, shows better results on linear function with random weights, as well as on random satisfiable MAX-3SAT problems.