{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03018867924528302, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.4520547945205475, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Transcendence and Providence: Reflections of a Physicist and Priest

with such activities. In a world of sinners, states could not endure without this readiness to use violence. In that sense all states always, in all their activities, depend upon violence. Third, in spite of his disavowal, H. appears to imply that a theory of the state helps Christians know how to live in the wider society. Because "most states do not depend on violence for many of their activities," he argues, the pacifist is not forced to choose between violence and the acceptance of injustice. But if that reason is mistaken, aren't those precisely the pacifist's alternatives? What H. needs is not to purge his ethic of all signs of a theory of the state, but to work out a more explicit and careful one.