{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02543859649122807, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013157894736842105, 'mean_word_length': 5.482954545454546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of the relative performance efficiencies of melt-blown and glass fiber filter media for managing fine particles

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to compare the performance efficiency of melt-blown and currently used glass fiber filter media under the same environmental conditions. To evaluate filter efficiency, filter class was determined according to ISO and European standards (EN 1822-1:2009) using an automated filter tester (0.3 μm size), taking into account particle filtration, fractional efficiency for negative pressure devices, and consumption of electrical power. The average fractional efficiency, quality factor (QF), fractional efficiency by dust loading amount, pressure by dust loading amount, and QF by dust loading amount were higher in the case of melt-blown media than in the case of glass fiber filters. The fractional efficiency of hydrocharged melt-blown filters was higher than that of uncharged media. Based on performance efficiency, melt-blown filters are more effective high efficiency particulate air filters than glass fiber media. Copyright © 2018 American Association for Aerosol Research