{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020123839009287926, 'fraction_numerical': 0.009287925696594427, 'mean_word_length': 4.935779816513762, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
More questions than answers.

Although the study by Goldstein et al1 that appeared in the February 1995 issue of Pediatrics is quite interesting, I am afraid that more questions remain unanswered in their article. I have a few concerns:
 1) The authors do not provide data regarding the frequency of abnormal neurologic outcome, nor do they provide any paradigms based on sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the variables considered to "predict" neurologic outcome in their cohort. I think that this is a major weakness of the article, which makes one wonder whether there was any such predictive ability for the studied variables.