{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020569620253164556, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007911392405063292, 'mean_word_length': 4.995260663507109, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Avaliação do Ensino da Dor no Amazonas

Introduction: Pain teaching at graduation is a fragmented area in the curricula of medical colleges around the world. The paper proposed by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) served as basis for curricular comparison in the present study. Objectives: To evaluate the presence of pain education in Amazonas, comparing it with the curricula outline model proposed by the IASP. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study, with an analysis of the curricula content of medical schools of the State of Amazonas, Brazil and a comparison with the curricula outline proposed by the IASP, generating a total percentage of topics covered or not during graduation. Results: We identified 170 subjects from the three medical schools in Amazonas that have available curricula. We did not identified disciplines with Pain as the main theme. From 70 themes of content proposed by the IASP, 39 (55.7%) were not mentioned at the curriculum of any of the universities. Conclusion: The current fragmentation of themes related to pain education in medical schools does not guarantee full coverage of the topic. The lack of specific curricula on pain reflects the low prevalence of its teaching at undergraduate level.