{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008823529411764706, 'mean_word_length': 4.581967213114754, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
In Response to Case Report ‘Begg’s Revisited’

I request you to kindly publish the following view point in the journal. I read with great interest the case report “Begg’s revisited: report of a case” in the January–March 2019 issue of the Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. I would like to compliment the authors for their courage in treating and publishing a case using Begg appliance that most practitioners, for no valid reason, consider an obsolete appliance. Doing camouflage for a class III patient of 12 years of age is a debatable issue, and I will not go into the pros and cons of it. However, I would like to make the following comments regarding the mechanics used: