{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016210739614994935, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.061349693251533, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Gender Rhetorics: Postures of Dominance and Submission in History.Richard C. Trexler

sense of Herbert's speakers as simultaneously restless and secure. White's exclusive concern with the religious content and context of the poetry wards off a consideration of the way in which the poetry might function in other social contexts, contexts that the work of Michael Schoenfeldt has so convincingly established. One cannot fault White for not conforming to scholarly discourse when it was never his intention to do so. This method, however, has drawbacks; White does not consider in his theory of reading the contribution to a personal engagement with a poetic text that a grounding in the criticism can provide. There seems to be expressed in this text a desire to approach Herbert's poetry unencumbered except by the life experiences of the reader, yet this gesture tends to obfuscate the ways in which specific critical theories of literature contribute to the readings constructed here.