{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015006821282401092, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004092769440654843, 'mean_word_length': 5.358381502890174, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The reduced responsiveness of neurones in nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis following their excitation by peripheral nerve stimulation.

1. Post‐stimulus histograms of neuronal activity, constructed from extracellular recordings in decerebrate, decerebellate cats, have been used to investigate the responsiveness of neurons in nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis following their excitation by a peripheral nerve stimulus. 2. The response to a testing stimulus applied to a peripheral nerve was depressed following the response to a conditioning stimulus applied to the same or a different peripheral nerve. This reduction in responsiveness was maximal within 50 msec of the peak of the response to the conditioning stimulus. Response latencies to the testing stimulus were increased during the period of reduced responsiveness. 3. Responsiveness to a peripheral nerve stimulus was also reduced following a spontaneous or an antidromically evoked spike, but this effect was weaker and much shorter‐lasting than that following a nerve‐evoked spike. Thus, the reduced responsiveness cannot be solely due to phenomena which are an inevitable consequence of an action potential in the neurone. 4. In spontaneously firing neurones, the duration of the reduced responsiveness to a testing stimulus generally outlasted the depression of spontaneous activity which often followed an excitation evoked by a peripheral nerve conditioning stimulus. 5. The reduction in responsiveness to a testing stimulus applied to the same nerve as the conditioning stimulus was greater and longer‐lasting than that to a testing stimulus applied to a different nerve. 6. When stimuli were applied to one nerve at a relatively high rate, the neurone became much less responsive to that input, but simultaneously became more responsive to low rate stimulation of other nerves. 7. It is concluded that the greater part of the reduced responsiveness is due to events occurring on the input pathway to a reticular neurone, or possibly in the region of the afferent endings on its dendrites. These processes may allow selective changes in responsiveness to different inputs, and enable the units to act as novelty detectors.