{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02006532897806813, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006999533364442371, 'mean_word_length': 5.658385093167702, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[In vitro characterization of glucuronosyl- and sulfotransferases involved in the conjugation of ethanol].

Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are minor metabolites of ethanol; for some years, both compounds have been used as direct biomarkers of alcohol consumption in forensic and clinical settings as well as in traffic medicine. Drinking experiments showed individual variations of the formation of EtG and EtS. At present, our knowledge on enzymes involved in the conjugation of ethanol is incomplete and partly inconsistent. The purpose of the present study was to characterize those enzymes that are capable of catalyzing glucuronidation and sulfation of ethanol including some potential inhibitors. Following optimization of incubation conditions, the formation rates of EtG and EtS from ethanol via recombinant glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs, hepatic) and sulfotransferases (SULTs, hepatic, intestinal), the kinetics and the inhibitory potential of polyphenols such as quercetin, kaempferol and resveratrol were determined. Analysis was performed following either solid phase extraction due to severe ion suppression of EtG or direct injection of the EtS-containing incubation mixture by high-pressure liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Deuterated analogues were used as internal standards. All UGTs were capable of metabolizing ethanol through glucuronidation; UGT1A9 and UGT2B7 exhibited the highest formation rates. All SULTs showed ethanol-sulfating activity with SULT1A1 being most active. Data for all enzymes could best be described by Michaelis-Menten kinetics. All polyphenols inhibited the conjugation of ethanol except UGT2B 15. Inhibition was reversible and competitive for most enzymes; mechanism-based inhibition was evident for UGT2B7 and SULT2A1 with regard to quercetin and for SULT1E1 with regard to kaempferol. These results suggest an influence on the formation rates of EtG and EtS by common food ingredients beside known polymorphisms of UGT and SULT family members. Further studies should be conducted to achieve a better understanding of the extent and significance of this influence.