{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02089783281733746, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013157894736842105, 'mean_word_length': 5.099056603773585, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Use of maximum length sequence analysis in newborn hearing testing.

The use of maximum length sequence analysis (MLSA) with rapid click rates may be of clinical value in newborn hearing screening because a greater number of individual responses can be signal averaged without adding to test time. To examine the potential clinical value of MLSA in newborn screening, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) from 50 premature newborns were studied. ABRs were acquired with conventional signal averaging at four stimulus intensity levels (50 dB, 40 dB, 30 dB, and 20 dB nHL) using a click rate of 33.3/sec. These responses were directly compared with the ABRs acquired with MLSA using a rate of 227.3/sec. MLSA and conventional signal averaging yielded similar results with no statistically significant differences in the number of responses detected. Across babies, the overall quality of the tracings slightly favored MLSA, particularly when recording conditions were poor. Though the results of this investigation do not support the use of MLSA as the primary technique in newborn screening in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), they do support consideration of the use of MLSA as an alternative technique when the responses obtained with conventional signal averaging are poorly defined.