{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01411764705882353, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.68, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Risk – a commentary by David G Carmichael*

ABSTRACT The author is to be congratulated on attempting to institute a discussion of an important subject. Unfortunately his paper does not do justice to the literature since it is severely incomplete. In this discussion first I will set out points where I agree with him, second those where I disagree and through that thirdly indicate some of the missing topics and researchers.