{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022727272727272728, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.841836734693878, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Long-term Aging of Closed-Celled Foam Insulation

Many factors influence the thermal efficiency [lambda value or k-factor] one obtains with foams blown with any of the commercial physical blowing agents. Factors affecting a product's thermal efficiency depend on, but are not limited to, the blowing agent itself – such items as the blowing agent's molecular weight, its boiling point, and its solubility in the foam matrix. Other factors depend on formulation parameters such as catalyst levels which affect speed of reaction and fineness of cell structure. Still others depend on the mixing efficiency of the equipment used to process the foams. Finally, a great deal of the contribution depends on the amount of protection the foam receives from its immediate environment - ranging from exposed foam to foam enclosed within impermeable facers. The long-term aging of foams has always been filled with myth and controversy. This has been true for every blowing agent that has been commercialized. We will try to dispel some of the myths with the results of several long-term aging studies, run on ecomate® and other commercial Blowing Agents.