{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014285714285714285, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.74331550802139, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Creative Analogy As a Means of Articulating Incongruent Sponsorships

Sponsorship congruence refers to the extent to which associations held for a property are perceived as sharing content and meaning with those held for a brand. Congruence has been shown to enhance the benefits derived from sponsorship. Consequently, it is important for an incongruent sponsor to articulate how it is related to a property. Analogical articulation represents a creative way of resolving perceptions of incongruity. A contribution of the current research is that it is the first to distinguish sponsorship effects on the basis of articulation type. Across four studies in which analogical articulations of incongruent sponsorships are compared to unarticulated and nonanalogical articulations (for both congruent and incongruent sponsorships), we find that analogical articulations improve perceptions of an incongruent sponsor's fit with a property and also perceptions of the sponsorship alignment's creativity. Analogical articulations also elicited a more pronounced “aha” moment of insight, which was found to mediate the effect of analogical articulation on perceptions of fit and creativity. Finally, analogical articulations yielded greater recall of the sponsorship.