{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025460455037919827, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0010834236186348862, 'mean_word_length': 6.158914728682171, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pharmacological considerations for azole antifungal drug management in cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients.

This paper aims to present our experience in the pharmacological approach of the management of azole antifungal drugs in cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients. Cystic fibrosis (CF) lung transplantation is associated with multi-factorial care management, because of immunosuppressive requirements, risk of infections, frequency of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, hepatic alterations and CF pharmacokinetics (PK) specificities that result in important PK variability. CF is associated with frequent colonization of the airways by filamentous fungi, especially by Aspergillus species. Today the antifungal therapeutic arsenal offers several possibilities for long-term oral therapy including azole drugs (itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole). Therefore, nephrotoxic amphotericin B should be avoided. The liver is important in the pharmacological profile of azole drugs, due to metabolic elimination, hepatotoxicity and PK drug-drug interaction (DDI) involving CYP3A4 metabolic inhibition. Targets for such DDI are numerous, but immunosuppressive drugs are of major concern, justifying combined therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of both azoles (inhibitors) and immunosuppressants (targets) on an individualized patient basis to adjust the coprescription quantitatively. The risk of long under-dosed periods, frequently addressed in this population, could justify, on a PK basis, the need for combination with an exclusive parenteral antifungal while waiting for azole relevant drug level. High PK variability, the risk of low exposure, therapeutic issues and DDI management in this complex underlying disease justify close monitoring with systematic combined TDM of azole and immunosuppressants, in case of coprescription.