{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0275049115913556, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0019646365422396855, 'mean_word_length': 4.795454545454546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Unequal Explanations: a Rejoinder to Toomey and Edgar

1. The meaning of ’capitalism’ We asserted the centrality of the concept of ’capitalism’ to the analysis of Australian society, and in particular argued that Edgar’s conception of the term was impoverished and mechanical.’ Our point was not important enough to detain Edgar. Toomey is not given to using the term ’capitalism’ but he takes our use of it to indicate vulgar economic determinism. We presume that this is what lies behind his assertions that