{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018802228412256268, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0201949860724234, 'mean_word_length': 5.415178571428571, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of Cricoid Pressure on the Success of Endotracheal Intubation with a Lightwand

BackgroundThe lightwand may be useful as an alternative for tracheal intubation during a rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in the presence of a full stomach. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of application of cricoid pressure on the success of lightwand intubation. MethodsSixty adult female patients presenting for abdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated to lightwand intubation with and without cricoid pressure. The time to successful intubation and number of attempts were recorded. ResultsAll 30 patients allocated to intubation without cricoid pressure were intubated successfully at the first attempt within a median time of 28 s (95% confidence interval, 18–77 s). Lightwand intubation with cricoid pressure was successful in 26 of 30 patients at the first attempt, but the median time to successful intubation was significantly longer at 48.5 s (95% confidence interval, 36–78 s;P = 0.001). Three patients required two attempts for successful intubation, and one could not be intubated with the lightwand while cricoid pressure was being applied. ConclusionsThe lightwand cannot be recommended for the first attempt at intubation where cricoid pressure is being applied because the time to successful intubation is significantly prolonged, and the failure rate for the first attempt at lightwand intubation is 13%.