{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01919191919191919, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013131313131313131, 'mean_word_length': 5.272151898734177, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Retroactive Inhibition of Meaningfully-Learned Sentences1

The interference theory of forgetting was developed and tested chiefly with rote verbal tasks. Whether the theory satisfactorily explains the forgetting of meaningful verbal material has been open to reasonable doubt. Most studies with prose passages have found little or no retroactive inhibition, and at least one experiment has reported facilitation (Ausubel, Stager, & Gaite, 1968). Anderson and Myrow (1971) and Myrow and Anderson (1972) were able to show that retroactive inhibition does appear with prose passages provided the test contains questions which would be answered differently on the basis of the two passages. They concluded that in all likelihood the tests used in the previous studies contained items that would be answered the same way on the basis of the two passages. In the final tally these items balanced the questions that would be answered differently, leaving a net effect of no retroactive inhibition.