{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019254658385093167, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0055900621118012426, 'mean_word_length': 5.62962962962963, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of two tools developed to assess the needs of older people with complex care needs

Abstract Greater standardisation of assessments of older people with complex care needs is a requirement of UK policy. This study explores the practicability and validity of two assessment tools, Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS-RAI) and EASY-Care. Participants, aged 65 years or over, living in care homes or awaiting hospital discharge, were assessed using randomly allocated paired instruments. Client evaluation questionnaires on the practicability of the tools were completed. Short Form 12 (SF12) questionnaires were administered to assess participants’ health status. Registered nurses undertook data collection and participated in two focus groups designed to explore the practicability of the tools. Statistical tests were applied to quantitative data to assess practicability and validity. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse focus group transcripts. In all, 238 assessments were completed. Older people and assessors generally reported that both tools were practicable, with EASY-Care preferred to MDS-RAI for practicability measures including ease of use, usefulness and acceptability. Focus groups illustrated the significance of professional judgement when using structured tools. Both tools were reasonable indicators of activities of daily living, but there were shortcomings in measurements of cognitive performance and depression. Both instruments require development to fully capture the older person’s perspectives of needs and to test the validity of key measures.