{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.052256532066508314, 'fraction_numerical': 0.00831353919239905, 'mean_word_length': 6.205128205128205, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Understanding Children's Literature (review)

women named above’’ (29). A community of women participates in the feminista project. In successive chapters, Saldívar-Hull uses the ‘‘alternative archives’’ (25) of particular Chicana fronteristas to examine Gloria Anzaldúa’s materialist, spiritual, and feminist revision of the borderlands; Sandra Cisneros’s recasting of Chicana struggles on many fronts; and Helena María Viramontes’s (re)incorporation of a Chicana, Latina, and Third World women’s community, or ‘‘political familia,’’ extending across the Americas (127). Saldívar-Hull closes her book with an analogy linking Central American women’s testimonios and the discourses of fronterista solidarity, a move that addresses the latter’s apparent glossing over of the valuable, historically rich responses of Central American feminists.