{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.009823182711198428, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.071428571428571, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An empirical evaluation of the use of CASE tools

Investigations conducted in three separate countries by four research groups on the use and effectiveness of CASE within industry are reported. Comparisons are drawn between the three sets of research findings, and similarities and differences in the impact of CASE within the different countries are identified. The report combines the experience of the authors, and provides a wider insight into the use and effectiveness of CASE tools on a worldwide scale.