{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023255813953488372, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.638297872340425, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Virtualization Techniques Compared: Performance, Resource, and Power Usage Overheads in Clouds

Virtualization solutions based on hypervisors or containers are enabling technologies for scalable, flexible, and cost-effective resource sharing. As the fundamental limitations of each technology are yet to be understood, they need to be regularly reevaluated to better understand the trade-off provided by latest technological advances. This paper presents an in-depth quantitative analysis of virtualization overheads in these two groups of systems and their gaps relative to native environments based on a diverse set of workloads that stress CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. KVM and XEN are used to represent hypervisor-based virtualization, and LXC and Docker for container-based platforms. The systems were evaluated with respect to several cloud resource management dimensions including performance, isolation, resource usage, energy efficiency, start-up time, and density. Our study is useful both to practitioners to understand the current state of the technology in order to make the right decision in the selection, operation and/or design of platforms and to scholars to illustrate how these technologies evolved over time.