{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025477707006369428, 'fraction_numerical': 0.008492569002123142, 'mean_word_length': 5.458904109589041, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Uma comparação entre as análises de Antonio Candido e Roberto Schwarz sobre José de Alencar

This work aims to map the positions of Antonio Candido and Roberto Schwarz on the production of Jose de Alencar, more specifically the novel Senhora. For that, the essays “Os tres alencares” by Antonio Candido, published in Formacao da literature brasileira (1959), will be considered; and “A importacao do romance e suas contradicoes em Alencar”, by Roberto Schwarz, published in Ao vencedor as batatas (1977). Both critics are commonly criticized for sharing the same theoretical and methodological arsenal, however, analyzes of Jose de Alencar reveal important differences about the authors’ conception of literary modernity. In this sense, from the comparison between the two critical texts on Alencarian production, this article intends to discuss the tensions and discontinuities between the positioning of Antonio Candido and Roberto Schwarz.