{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029296875, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0029296875, 'mean_word_length': 4.994152046783626, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Acceptance of Mobile, Classroom-Bound E-Learning Systems from the Perspective of Students and Lectures

The introduction of m-learning systems often do not show the expected benefits. The main problem is the low acceptance of this new kind of teaching and learning process by some interest groups. In context of the PhD thesis the problem of "Technology Adoption" from the perspective of students and lecturers needs to get deeply analysed. Academic papers that explicitly analyse the intention of use by students and lecturers through explorative research in classroom-bound mobile e-learning do not exist. Based on two separated explorative studies (students study (I), teachers study (II)) factors of acceptance genesis should be identified. After that, these factors should, on basis of the dynamic acceptance model according to Kollmann [1] be correlated to the UTAUT 2 model according to Venkatesh et al. [2]. In the process it is possible to find out new constructs respectively factors, which could modify the model.