{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023809523809523808, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007936507936507936, 'mean_word_length': 5.0843373493975905, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The quality of cancer registries data has to become 'liquid'.

Single and multiple sources of information may be fruitfully used to produce meaningful information in the process incidence fulfilment is ongoing. For example, the burden of incident breast cancers may be accurately estimated selecting codes for dismissions and treatments in the hospital database only. These data turned to be perfect for estimating the burden, but not for creating a nominative cohort of patients (Ferretti et al., 2009).