{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015046296296296295, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.091549295774648, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Nitric oxide and the liver.

In recent years, the role of nitric oxide (NO) in the pathogenesis of liver disease and its complications has been extensively studied. There remain, however, many areas of controversy. In particular, the effect of NO on vascular function in the systemic circulation and the hepatic microcirculation has received the greatest attention. It has been proposed on the one hand that increased NO synthesis is responsible for the development of the hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis, while decreased production of NO within the hepatic microcirculation may be important in the development of parenchymal tissue damage and the onset of portal hypertension. The purpose of this review is to examine the available data concerning the role of NO in liver disease and to discuss some of the controversies and contradictions that surround it.