{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017333333333333333, 'fraction_numerical': 0.012, 'mean_word_length': 5.530434782608696, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The long‐term outcomes in liver transplantation using donation after circulatory death grafts

We read with great interest the manuscript by Sasaki et al.[1] Because conditional survival in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation (DCD LT) was inferior in the long-term using national registry data from 2002 to 2017, the authors ascribed the protracted higher risks inherent to DCD liver grafts. We independently analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database of the same study population over the same study period. Although the authors should be congratulated on a substantial effort and nuanced approach, our analysis suggests several points warrant emphasis to interpret the authors' work in the proper context.