{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.014941302027748132, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.797101449275362, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Model to Support CBRN Defence

There is no shortage of media alerting to the threat from chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) materials and their delivery modes, reflecting and fostering public perceptions of vulnerability. The threat is considered sufficiently real for many countries to have responded with considerable purchases of equipment as a demonstration of capability to satisfy public expectation and dissuade potential aggressors. Essential organisational structures and training programmes are being refined and reactive thinking is giving way to considered, informed planning. The wide range of components involved in CBRN defence (and the complexity within each component) is demonstrated by the wide range of stakeholder organisations, skills and equipment mustered to address the threat. Stakeholders are often challenged to appreciate the wider CBRN picture when busy developing their own capability.