{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01972386587771203, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011439842209072978, 'mean_word_length': 5.691292875989446, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Double-Chamber Tissue Expanders Optimize Lower Pole Expansion in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Requiring Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

IntroductionTissue expander-based reconstruction in the irradiated breast has been associated with significant complications, including infection, skin breakdown and implant extrusion, and poor aesthetic outcome. These complications may be attributed to inadequate lower pole expansion causing increased pressure on the suture line. Achieving and maintaining adequate lower pole expansion in the reconstructed breast requiring adjuvant radiation therapy may reduce the pressure/strain on the suture line and preserve the natural appearance of the breast. We describe the effective use of a double-chamber tissue expander to control lower pole expansion in immediate breast reconstruction requiring adjuvant radiation therapy. MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent postoperative radiation therapy after immediate breast reconstruction using Sientra's double-chamber tissue expander, performed by a single plastic surgeon from 2012 to 2014. ResultsA total of 22 patients met our inclusion criteria. Seventeen patients had bilateral, and 5 patients had unilateral reconstruction (n = 39 total breasts). All patients were over expanded by 20% on the side affected by cancer before the start of radiation, which started by the sixth postoperative week. There was no expansion during radiation therapy. Two patients had further expansion after radiation therapy was completed. The tissue expanders were exchanged for shaped silicone gel implants 3 to 4 months after completion of radiation.A total of 2 complications occurred in 2 patients (9.0%) and 2 breasts (5.1%). These included an infection in one patient and a tissue expander leak in another. No patient developed Baker grade 3 or 4 capsular contracture, seroma, or device malposition. Good lower pole contour and projection was maintained in all breasts at 9 to 12 months of follow-up. ConclusionsThe double-chamber tissue expander is effective in controlling shape, contour, and position of the breast following immediate tissue expander reconstruction requiring adjuvant radiation therapy, with decreased complication rates compared to standard expanders. These results suggest that double-chamber tissue expanders may be the preferred expander option in patients requiring adjuvant radiation therapy. Prospective clinical studies are needed to better evaluate the advantages of this reconstructive approach.