{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.028715003589375447, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01148600143575018, 'mean_word_length': 4.931914893617021, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Operational Trials of Cut-To-Length Harvesting of Poplar in a Mixed Wood Stand

Abstract Cut-to-length harvesting systems offer an alternative to conventional mechanical systems for thinning mixedwood stands. We evaluated the performance of a single-grip harvester and forwarder in a poplar-dominated mixedwood stand in Southern Ontario to quantify the effect of tree size and tree form on harvester productivity and harvesting cost, and to assess the damage caused by the harvesting operation to advance regeneration and residual trees. A single-tree selection silvicultural system was used. Individual trees were assigned a form index based on their visual estimates of limb size and stem form. The cut-to-length harvester produced 23.1 m3 per productive machine hour (PMH). Forwarder productivity was 17.2 m3/PMH. The results indicate a significant and positive relationship between harvester productivity and tree size (dbh) and tree form. Tree size (dbh) has the greatest influence on the unit cost of harvesting. At an average 27 cm dbh and extraction distance of 200 m, the stump-to-landing cost was approximately 10 US$/m3 As tree size increased, the unit cost of wood produced decreased. Damage to residual trees and advance regeneration was minimal. The results suggest that single-grip cut-to-length harvesting systems can be effective in managing poplar-dominated mixedwood stands.