{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023465703971119134, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.904255319148936, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Oceanography: Albatross of Diplomacy Haunts Seafaring Scientists

judgment of men who are not themselves in the laboratory. But it has a certain appeal to government officials, who are looking for administrative efficiency, coordination, and research that bears on targeted projects. The source of all this concern over peer review is an eight-page document from the OMB that, after a precis of the system as it works at NIH and at the National Institute of Mental Health, lists eight "problems with the peer review system." Among them are the following: