{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029411764705882353, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.055555555555555, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
UN–U.S. Relations from the Standpoint of the Organization: What Can the UN Do with an “Indispensable Nation” and “Reluctant Sheriff”?

Abstract This article analyzes the short-term status and the long-term nature of UN–U.S. relations and concludes that focusing on long-term policy directions generates a different and remarkable pattern of continuity with previous administrations that extends back to the creation of the United Nations and runs counter to the comforting notion that we are in a mere fleeting moment of irresponsible insanity.