{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023178807947019868, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.173469387755102, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Snapshot of Media Ethics for Online Journalists

to be considered legitimate? Her framework is unclear on this point. More troublesome is her suggestion that press critics should “serve as spokespeople for the audiences by first soliciting their feedback and then taking it to the press” [emphasis added]. More critical voices with autonomous bite, not fewer, are exactly what we need in some quarters. These conversations, for which Wyatt has set the philosophical stage, will undoubtedly continue. She is to be applauded for gathering disparate strands and weaving an invaluable conversation starter.