{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.026945201332122314, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015440508628519528, 'mean_word_length': 5.465753424657534, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ifosfamide-based drug combinations: preclinical evaluation of drug interactions and translation into the clinic.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating antineoplastic agent with documented activity against a variety of solid tumor types, most notably lung cancer, testicular cancer, and sarcoma. Ifosfamide has been included in various drug combination protocols, usually on an empirical basis. To gather more insight into the mechanisms that underlie these drug interactions and to develop guidelines for further improvement of clinical combination protocols, we performed a broad preclinical evaluation program of ifosfamide-based combination regimens using isobologram analysis of drug interactions. In established cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-refractory ovarian carcinoma cell lines, a schedule-dependent drug interaction between paclitaxel and activated hydroperoxy-ifosfamide (4-OOH-IF) could be demonstrated. When both drugs were given for 2 hours, simultaneous exposure or the sequence of paclitaxel followed by 4-OOH-IF were additive or synergistic. In contrast, application of 4-OOH-IF before paclitaxel resulted in pronounced antagonism. Based on the sequence-dependent synergistic interactions a phase I trial was initiated with paclitaxel given on day 1 and ifosfamide given on days 2 to 5 in patients with cisplatin-refractory ovarian cancer. Four dose levels were evaluated in 18 patients. The maximum tolerated dose was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 and ifosfamide 2,000 mg/m2 on days 2 to 5, with central nervous system toxicity and nephrotoxicity being dose-limiting. The recommended dose for further evaluation of this combination was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 and ifosfamide 1,500 mg/m2 on days 2 to 5. Although all patients were heavily pretreated with multiple agents, nine of 18 patients achieved an objective response. Ifosfamide also has been shown to reduce cellular glutathione content; thus, a series of experiments evaluated the ability of activated cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide to deplete cellular glutathione in vitro. It was demonstrated that glutathione depletion is dose- and time-dependent, with 4-OOH-IF leading to a more pronounced suppression of cellular glutathione compared with 4-OOH-Cy. The decrease in cellular glutathione content was maximal at 2 hours after drug treatment; however, cellular glutathione levels returned to normal within 24 hours. When 4-OOH-IF was combined in vitro with cisplatin, schedule-dependent interactions again became obvious. The highest antitumor activity was seen when both drugs were given concurrently; sequential application with 4-OOH-IF given before cisplatin resulted in antagonism. Since adequate glutathione levels are necessary for multidrug resistance protein (MRP) function, glutathione depletion might lead to reversal of MRP-mediated drug resistance. Preliminary data showed that 4-OOH-IF significantly decreases glutathione concentrations in MRP-expressing human HT1080/DR4 sarcoma cells, leading to maximum steady-state reduction after a 90-min exposure to 4-OOH-IF. Taken together the data reported here demonstrate that in vitro ifosfamide may potentiate the antitumor activity of a variety of cytotoxic agents and therefore merits further clinical evaluation in drug combinations (eg, taxanes, anthracyclines).