{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010940919037199124, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0087527352297593, 'mean_word_length': 5.1891891891891895, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Review of bite mark evidence.

Exactness and precision of detail characterize the techniques and methodologies by which bite mark evidence has been analyzed. Admissibility of scientific evidence into the courts requires that it be based on accepted procedures within the area of that discipline. Admission of bite mark evidence is traced from 1923; methods by which the evidence has been analyzed and those techniques currently being developed are reviewed.