{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013729977116704805, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.4338235294117645, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Visual Comparison of a Single Scenario in Three Driving Simulators

For driving research and training. it is desirable to replicate a single driving scenario across multiple driving simulator platforms. However, until recently, the task of developing and implementing the same scenarios across multiple platforms has not been undertaken. The present paper assesses such an effort across of three different simulator platforms. To evaluate the effort from a visual perspective, a combination of subjective and objective measures were used. The manipulation of environmental visual complexity was also assessed. While the manipulation of visual complexity was only partially successful, each of the three simulator sites was able to create extraordinarily similar driving scenarios. These results open the door for a wide range of driving simulator studies and applications.