{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017110266159695818, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.5, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Evidence-based rheumatology practice

Purpose of reviewThis review is intended to update readers on recent developments in the evidence-based practice of rheumatology. Recent findingsSeveral new or updated evidence-based practice guidelines have recently emerged. In addition, a large body of evidence upon which to base practice has been addressed in the many systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have been newly published, including nine new or updated Cochrane reviews. Several studies have also investigated adherence to practice guidelines, interventions to improve clinical practice, and quality of care in the field of rheumatology in the past year. SummaryEvidence-based rheumatology is an ongoing effort, with continuing revision and update of recommendations. It may currently be used to address a wide variety of clinical questions. The initiatives on practice-based research to establish quality indicators and identify areas where rheumatology practice can be enhanced are a welcome addition to health services research in this field.