{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02704626334519573, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002491103202846975, 'mean_word_length': 5.110869565217391, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 2, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region ed. by Francis Panzironi and Katherine Gelber (review)

The Capability Approach: Development Practice and Public Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region. Edited by Francis Panzironi and Katherine Gelber. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. Pp. 214. This is a very good introduction of the capability approach, a form of evaluation for public policy. Rather than asking if a policy has simply improved incomes, opportunities, or even happiness, it asks if the policy has improved the ability to do things that people themselves want to do. It is an attractive approach, particularly for those in the education sector. The idea goes back to Aristotelian ideas of human flourishing. The key distinction made by its modern proponent, the economist Amartya Sen, is between capability (the ability, resources, and opportunities) and "functionings" (the valued outcomes, which may vary between people and groups). For example, welfare policy should not simply be aimed at providing indigenous minorities with the same level of services as everyone else but should be supporting them in achieving their own particular goals, which may be quite different from those of the majority. The edited book, which is an outcome of a conference in 2009, is divided into three parts. The first introduces the ideas, particularly those of Sen himself, and the philosopher, Martha Nussbaum, who developed her own interpretation of them. From her work on development and the role of women in India, she devised a list of ten "central human capabilities" ranging from bodily health and integrity through the ability to form attachments, affiliate with others, and play. There is an obvious link to ideas of human rights, and similar questions arise about their universality and openness to change. The book's introduction also rehearses objections to Sen and Nussbaum's arguments but goes on to show the potential capability theory has on tackling old problems from a new perspective. The second part of the book considers the application of these ideas to the intransigent problems of marginalization in the Asia Pacific region, particularly in: government policy towards indigenous people in Australia and New Zealand; older people and urban development in Sydney; and the living standards of Australian children generally. The authors use different methods --interviews, analysis of the law, and regression analysis--to highlight the manner in which capability theory can address these issues. The third part turns to developing countries, particularly: Samoa; Vanuatu; Papua New Guinea; and Sri Lanka. This section shows how capability theory is being applied by researchers in the region to tackle local issues in the aforementioned countries. …