{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.012958963282937365, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3561643835616435, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A comparison among different synchronized tree traversal algorthims for spatial joins

Spatial join techniques for spatial access methods were analysed, considering factor such as buffer pool size, page size and intermediate join indexes ordering criteria. This analysis was based on real data, taken from GIS applications for utilities. Results of this work assess the way those factors affect spatial join performance and can be used for tunning the algorithms.