{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030343007915567283, 'fraction_numerical': 0.026385224274406333, 'mean_word_length': 5.682819383259912, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Pure subtelomeric microduplications as a cause of mental retardation

Submicroscopic subtelomeric aberrations are a common cause of mental retardation (MR). New molecular techniques allow the identification of subtelomeric microduplications, but their frequency and significance are largely unknown. We determined the frequency of subtelomeric, pure microduplications in a cohort of 624 patients with MR and/or multiple congenital anomalies using multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and delineated the identified microduplications using array based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH). In 11 patients, MLPA revealed a subtelomeric duplication without a concurrent deletion. Additional fluorescence in situ hybridization studies and parental analyses showed that three had occurred de novo: one duplication 5q34qter (12.7 Mb), one duplication 9q34.13qter (7.2 Mb) and one duplication 9p24.2pter (4.1 Mb). Five microduplications (9p, 11q, 12q, 15q and 16p) appeared to be inherited from an unaffected parent, while in three cases (9p, 12p and 17p) the parents were not available for testing. Based on our findings and data from the literature, the three de novo duplications were the only ones likely to be disease‐causing, leading to a frequency of pathogenic subtelomeric, pure microduplications of 0.5%. Our study shows that subtelomeric microduplications are an infrequent cause of MR and that additional clinical and family studies are required to assess their clinical significance.