{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.007984031936127744, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3544303797468356, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Sound Arguments and Power in Evaluation Research and Policy-Making

This article proposes a measuring instrument that can establish to what extent either sound arguments or power are to be found in scientific and political discussions. By way of illustrating this measuring instrument, an account is given of a research project that investigated the relation between the quality of evaluation research and the quality of discussion in policy-making processes in which this evaluation research was used