{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.019313304721030045, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011802575107296138, 'mean_word_length': 5.962686567164179, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: treatment with percutaneous endopyelotomy.

The authors review their experience with percutaneous endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Twenty-four patients with symptoms of ureteropelvic junction obstruction underwent excretory urography, which revealed nonspecific narrowing in several cases. Angiography was performed in 14 patients suspected of having a vessel crossing at the junction, but such a vessel was found in only four, who subsequently underwent dismembered pyeloplasty. One patient was treated with decompression, but later required endopyelotomy. Nineteen patients underwent percutaneous endopyelotomy; in 11 of them, dilation with a balloon catheter was required to ensure complete disruption of the stenosis. After 6-36 months follow-up, 17 of the 19 patients were asymptomatic with no obstruction and two were asymptomatic with mild obstruction.