{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016055045871559634, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.285302593659942, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Application of Fracture Control to Mitigate Failure Consequence Under BDBE


 As a lesson learned from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, the industry recognized the imporatance of mitigating accident consequences after Beyond Design Basis Events (BDBE). We propose the concept of applying fracture control to mitigate failure consequences of nuclear components under BDBE.
 Requirements are different between Design Basis Events (DBE) and BDBE. In the case of DBE, it requires preventing occurrence of failures, and thus, its structural approach is strengthening. On the other hand, BDBE requires mitigating failure consequences. The simple strengthening approach with DBE is inappropriate for this BDBE requirement.
 As the structural strengthening approach for mitigating failure consequences, we propose applying the concept of fracture control. The fundamental idea is to control the sequence of failure locations and modes. Preceding failures release loadings and prevent further catastrophic consequent failures. At the end, locations and modes of failure are limited.
 Absolute strength evaluation for each failure mode is not easy especially for BDBE. Fracture control, however, requires only relative strength evaluation among different locations and failure modes.
 Our paper discusses two sample applications of our proposed method. One is a fast reactor vessel under severe accident conditions. Our method controls the upper part of a vessel above the liquid coolant surface weaker than the lower part. This strength control maintains enough coolant even after a high pressure and high temperature condition causes failure of the reactor vessel because structural failure in the upper part releases internal pressure to protect the lower part.
 The other example is the piping under a large earthquake. Our proposal controls strength of supports weaker than the piping itself. When the supports fail first, natural frequencies of piping systems drop. When the natural frequencies of dominant modes are lower than the peak frequency of seismic loads, seismic loads hardly transfer to the piping and catastrophic failures such as collapse or break are avoided.