{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032175032175032175, 'fraction_numerical': 0.05405405405405406, 'mean_word_length': 5.884955752212389, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Highlights From the Circulation Family of Journals.

Circulation. 2018;137:2528–2533. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035597 2528 The financial burden of postcardiac arrest care in the United States remains largely unknown. This analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003–2012) observed increases in the inflation-adjusted cost associated with index hospitalization after cardiac arrest. The use of cardiovascular interventions and devices such as defibrillators, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, balloon pumps, and hypothermia protocols, and certain hospital characteristics, as well, were the main contributors to rising cost. The rising costs of cardiac arrest care further support the need for funded research into prediction and prevention of cardiac arrest.