{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011764705882352941, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.324324324324325, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of the Choice of Connectives on the Relation between the Logic of Constant Domains and Classical Predicate Logic

It is known that not only classical semantics but also intuitionistic Kripke semantics can be generalized so that it can treat arbitrary propositional connectives characterized by truth tables, or truth functions. In our previous work, it has been shown that the set of Kripkevalid propositional sequents and that of classically valid propositional sequents coincide if and only if all available propositional connectives are monotonic. The present paper extend this result to first-order logic showing that, in the case of predicate logic, the condition that all available propositional connectives are monotonic is a necessary and sufficient condition for the set of sequents valid in all constant domain Kripke models, not the set of Kripke-valid sequents, and the set of classically valid sequents to coincide.