{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030157342657342656, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013111888111888112, 'mean_word_length': 5.104, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of push-out bond strength of bioceramic sealer with bioceramic coated and non-bioceramic coated Gutta-percha: an in vitrostudy

Background: The goal of the endodontic treatment is to achieve a fluid-tight impervious seal to prevent the ingress of bacteria and the occurrence of any pathology in future. The endodontic sealer plays a crucial role in obtaining the hermetic seal by filling all the spaces and by binding to the root dentin and to the core obturating material, which is usually gutta-percha.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the push-out bond strength of Endosequence BC sealer with bioceramic coated gutta-percha and non-bioceramic coated gutta-percha.
Materials and methods: A total of 36 extracted human maxillary central incisors were decoronated to standardize the root length of 15mm. Working length was determined and Biomechanical preparation for all the samples was done with a Mtwo (VDW Company) rotary file till 40/.06. Samples were randomly divided into three groups containing 12 teeth in each group based on the obturation procedure, namely Group 1: Endosequence BC sealer along with Endosequence bioceramic coated gutta-percha (n=12), Group 2: Endosequence BC sealer along with normal gutta-percha (n=12), Group 3: AH Plus sealer along with normal gutta-percha. All the samples were obturated using single cone technique. The specimens were sectioned orthogonally at middle third to obtain three sections of 1mm thick. All the samples were subjected to the push-out bond strength test with the universal testing machine. The data were subjected to one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc analysis.
Results: Samples obturated with Endosequence BC sealer with Endosequence bioceramic coated gutta-percha showed the maximum push-out bond strength followed by Group 3 and Group 2.  One-way Anova showed significant differences (p=0.021) among the groups. In posthoc analysis, the specimens from group 1 exhibited significant differences (p=0.016) with the group 2 specimens.
Conclusion: The push-out bond strength of Endosequence Bioceramic sealer with Endosequence Bioceramic coated gutta-percha was significantly higher than that of Endosequence Bioceramic sealer with normal gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer with normal gutta-percha.