{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02623574144486692, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007224334600760456, 'mean_word_length': 5.176056338028169, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Visualizing Muscle Sialic Acid Expression in the GNED207VTgGne-/- Cmah-/- Model of GNE Myopathy: A Comparison of Dietary and Gene Therapy Approaches.

BACKGROUND
GNE myopathy (GNEM) is a rare, adult-onset, inclusion body myopathy that results from partial loss of function mutations in the GNE gene. GNE encodes UDP-GlcNAc epimerase/Mannose-6 kinase, a protein with two enzymatic activities that comprise the committed step in biosynthesis of sialic acid (SA), an essential glycan that appears on the terminal positions of many extracellular oligosaccharide chains. These GNE mutations can cause a reduction of SA in many tissues, although pathology is restricted to skeletal muscles through a poorly understood mechanism.


OBJECTIVE
Despite recent advances in the field, it remains unclear which therapeutic avenue is most promising for the restoration of SA level in skeletal muscle affected by GNEM. Our objective was to assess dietary and gene therapy strategies for GNEM in Cmah-deficient GNED207VTgGne-/- mice, a model that allows for the visualization of orally delivered N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc), one of the two predominant SA forms in muscle.


METHODS
Methods included in situ physiology studies of the tibialis anterior muscle, studies of ambulation and limb grip strength, and muscle staining using MAA, SNA, and anti-Neu5Gc antibody, along with qPCR, qRT-PCR, western blot, and HPLC studies to assess virally introduced DNA, GNE gene expression, GNE protein expression, and SA expression.


RESULTS
We found that a diet enriched in Neu5Gc-containing glycoproteins had no impact on Neu5Gc immunostaining in muscles of GNEM model mice. Delivery of a single high dose oral Neu5Gc therapy, however, did increase Neu5Gc immunostaining, though to levels below those found in wild type mice. Delivery of a single dose of GNE gene therapy using a recombinant Adeno Associated Virus (rAAV) vector with a liver-specific or a muscle-specific promoter both caused increased muscle Neu5Gc immunostaining that exceeded that seen with single dose monosaccharide therapy.


CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate that dietary loading of Neu5Gc-containing glycoproteins is not effective in increasing muscle Neu5Gc expression, while single dose oral Neu5Gc monosaccharide or GNE gene therapy are. Neu5Gc immunostaining, however, showed greater changes than did lectin staining or HPLC analysis. Taken together, these results suggest that Neu5Gc immunostaining may be more sensitive technique to follow SA expression than other more commonly used methods and that liver expression of GNE may contribute overall muscle SA content.