{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015779092702169626, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.120481927710843, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
An analysis of entry into practice arguments.

This article describes the findings derived from a content analysis of arguments related to the entry-into-practice issue. Written and oral testimonies presented to the North Dakota Board of Nursing were examined within the framework of Lewin's change theory. An analysis of what was said and by whom, provided a heuristic classification of the substantive content of the arguments and the identification of argument profiles in terms of selected demographics.