{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01925925925925926, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.982300884955753, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On crossroads with Constitutional Morality: The (Un)tamed ERP test

This article seeks to recall the ‘Essential Religious Practices’ test which has been theorized and widely interpreted by the Supreme Court of India. Judges assuming the theological attire is something which attracts a lot of attention, whenever there is an invocation of this doctrine. Over the years, courts have been inconsistent, in some cases due reliance was paid to the religious texts, in others on the empirical behavior of followers and so on so forth. The test has served to limit the scope of legal protection under the Constitution and give regard to the interventionist tendencies of the State.