{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022779043280182234, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01366742596810934, 'mean_word_length': 5.3768115942028984, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
From intelligent to smart cities

globalisation for several centuries have developed the reflexive responses of resilience, pragmatism and genius for adaptation’ (73). The majority of case studies from Part III, however, suggest that the resilience of Asian cities has been sorely tested by the most recent wave of globalisation. In an excellent paper published in 2010, the eminent planning theorist John Friedmann deplored the fact that: