{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013257575757575758, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.151162790697675, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Tocqueville as Historian of the Struggle Between Democracy and Aristocracy in America

Most scholars of Tocqueville see him simply discussing an omnipresent liberalism in America. Building on the misleading work of Louis Harts, which neglected both Tocqueville's discussion of feudalism in the America South as well as his discussion of the reasons why the North became so uniquely attached to d emocracy, they ignore his main arguments about the orgins of democracy and aristocracy — and the struggle between them — in America.