{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04961678096006454, 'fraction_numerical': 0.033481242436466316, 'mean_word_length': 4.727482678983834, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Abstract 457: Comparison of Effect of Audio-Instructed and Video-Instructed Dispatcher-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Resuscitation Outcomes After Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest


 Introduction:
 This study aimed to compare the effect of audio-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) and video-instructed DA-CPR on resuscitation outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the real world.
 
 
 Methods:
 A cross-sectional study was conducted for resuscitation-attempted adult OHCAs of 2017 in Seoul, Korea. Seoul implemented video-instructed DA-CPR program in 2017. According to the protocol, when dispatcher detected OHCA, they checked two condition: 1) more than two bystanders were in the scene, 2) they could handle a video-call. If both conditions were met, dispatcher initiated the CPR instruction and called back a video-call to the caller for instructing CPR via video (video group). Unless, standard audio-instructed DA-CPR was provided (audio group). The primary outcome was survival to discharge. The secondary outcome was good neurological outcome at hospital discharge. The tertiary outcome was early instruction time interval (ITI, time from call to the initiation of CPR instruction≤ 90 seconds). The study outcomes were compared between audio and video group. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated adjusting for potential confounders. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to increase comparability of two groups and same logistic regression model was analyzed for the PSM population.
 
 
 Results:
 A total of 1,720 eligible OHCA cases (1,489 in audio and 231 in video group) were evaluated. The median seconds of ITI was 136 seconds in audio group and 122 seconds in the video group (p=0.12). Survival to discharge was 8.9% in audio group and 14.3% in video group (p<0.01). Good neurological outcome was 5.8% in audio group and 10.4% in video group (p<0.01). Compared with audio group, the AORs (95% CIs) for survival to discharge, good neurological outcome and early ITI of the video group were 1.20 (0.74 to 1.94), 1.28 (0.73 to 2.26) and 1.00 (0.70 t0 1.43), respectively. PSM population showed similar results with original population.
 
 
 Conclusion:
 Compared with audio-instructed DA-CPR, video-instructed DA-CPR was not associated with survival improvement in the observational study.
