{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.011682242990654205, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004672897196261682, 'mean_word_length': 5.5561224489795915, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Biomechanical issues of tissue-engineered constructs for articular cartilage regeneration: in vitro and in vivo approaches.

BACKGROUND
Given the limited regenerative capacity of injured articular cartilage, the absence of suitable therapeutic options has encouraged tissue-engineering approaches for its regeneration or replacement.


SOURCES OF DATA
Published articles in any language identified in PubMed and Scopus electronic databases up to August 2019 about the in vitro and in vivo properties of cartilage engineered constructs. A total of 64 articles were included following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.


AREAS OF AGREEMENT
Regenerated cartilage lacks the biomechanical and biological properties of native articular cartilage.


AREAS OF CONTROVERSY
There are many different approaches about the development of the architecture and the composition of the scaffolds.


GROWING POINTS
Novel tissue engineering strategies focus on the development of cartilaginous biomimetic materials able to repair cartilage lesions in association to cell, trophic factors and gene therapies.


AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH
A multi-layer design and a zonal organization of the constructs may lead to achieve cartilage regeneration.