{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025454545454545455, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0024242424242424242, 'mean_word_length': 5.403100775193798, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of Different Speech-Processing Strategies on the Same Implant Patients

Two patients with transcutaneously connected eight elec­ trode scala tympani implants were given subsets of the Min­ imal Auditory Capabilities test during stimulation with five speech-processing strategies — two single channel and three multichannel. Although there were significant (p < .05%) scores on some items with all types of stimula­ tion, one patient did as well with single channel analog as with multichannel stimulation. She is an enthusiastic fulltime user of single channel stimulation. The other patient, a nonuser of the same device, preferred (and performed better with) multichannel stimulation. This is an interim report because neither patient has yet had the opportunity of nonlaboratory use of the multichannel devices.