{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03742384682332463, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0026109660574412533, 'mean_word_length': 4.693069306930693, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparison of the Effects of Sociodemographic Factors and Health Status on Use of Outpatient Mental Health Services in HMO and Fee-for-service Plans

The authors compared the effects of age, sex, socioeconomic status, and mental and physical health status on the use of outpatient mental health services in one well-established health maintenance organization (HMO) and in fee-for-service plans. In the Seattle site of the Rand Health Insurance Study (HIS), families were randomly assigned to HMO or fee-for-service coverage. Adults incur much greater expense for outpatient mental health services than children in both an HMO and a fee-for-service plan with identical coverage (i.e., free care). However, the difference in use between adults and children is significantly greater for the fee-for-service plan than the HMO (P < 0.01). Similarly, education has significantly greater effects on use for the fee-for-service than the HMO plan. Increased income has a significant negative effect on use in both the HMO and fee-for-service plans. Mental and physical health status have similar large effects on use in both fee-for-service and HMO plans.