{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022397891963109356, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.775665399239544, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Towards a Multi-Perspective Time of Flight Laser Ranging Device Based on Mirrors and Prisms

This paper investigates the feasibility of redirecting the field of view (FOV) of a light-based time-of-flight (ToF) ranging device, commonly known as a pulsed lidar, using fixed mirrors and prisms for possible future use in robotics. The emphasis is on configurations where the FOV redirection element is positioned beyond the ranging device’s dead zone. A custom made direct ToF ranging device with time-over-threshold (TOT)-based walk error compensation was used to evaluate the effects of the FOV redirecting optics on range measurement accuracy and precision. The tests include redirecting the FOV with a clean prism with anti-reflective (AR) coating on its legs, as well as with a regular and a first surface mirror in both a clean and dusted state. The study finds the prism to be unsuitable due to parasitic reflections, which ruin the ranging data. The clean mirrors were found to have no noticeable effect on ranging accuracy. When they are dusty, mirrors introduce a negative measurement error. This effect is the most pronounced when a mirror is positioned toward the end of the partial dead zone of the ToF rangefinder, but loses influence as the mirror is moved farther away. The error is attributed to the parasitic reflection off dust on the mirror, which reduces the time of detection of the pulse reflected off the real target, and interferes with the walk error compensation by widening the detected pulse.