{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.041223404255319146, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02526595744680851, 'mean_word_length': 4.99601593625498, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Peanut-based ready-to-use therapeutic food: acceptability among malnourished children and community workers in Bangladesh.

OBJECTIVES
To assess the acceptability of a ready-to-use therapeutic food (Plumpy'nut(®) [PPN]) among 1) care givers of malnourished children and 2) community health workers (CHWs) at a nutrition rehabilitation centre in an urban slum in Dhaka, Bangladesh.


METHODS
This was a cross-sectional semi-structured questionnaire survey conducted between April and June 2011 as part of a nutritional programme run by Médecins Sans Frontières. The study population included care givers of malnourished children aged 6-59 months who received PPN for at least 3 weeks, and CHWs.


RESULTS
Of the 149 care givers (93% female) interviewed, 60% expressed problems with PPN acceptability. Overall, 43% perceived the child's dissatisfaction with the taste, 31% with consistency and 64% attributed side effects to PPN (nausea, vomiting, loose motion, diarrhoea, abdominal distension and pain). It is to be noted that 47% of children needed encouragement or were forced to eat PPN, while 5% completely rejected it after 3 weeks. Of the 29 CHWs interviewed, 48% were dissatisfied with PPN's taste and consistency, and 55% with its smell. However, 91% of the care givers and all CHWs still perceived a therapeutic benefit of PPN for malnourished children.


CONCLUSION
Despite a therapeutic benefit, only 4 in 10 care givers perceived PPN as being acceptable as a food product, which is of concern.