{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020464601769911505, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0005530973451327434, 'mean_word_length': 5.5071942446043165, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Variability in space and time: contrasting fruit distribution patterns in the deceptive orchid Orchis militaris.

In angiosperms, a decrease in fruit production towards the apex of individual inflorescences is usually observed. Orchids are thought to be primarily pollination-limited species, and non-uniform pollination could cause this decrease pattern in several species. Fruit production was investigated in relation to flower position and floral display size in Orchis militaris (Orchidaceae), a deceptive species. Over 2 years, eight populations of O. militaris were studied and fruit position along the inflorescence was recorded. Generalised linear models were performed to examine the effect of population, year, flower position and floral display size on fruit production. The dominant pattern was characterised by a higher fruit set in the middle part of the inflorescence (parabolic pattern). A non-directional pattern of fruit production was also detected in some populations. Within a given population, patterns were generally consistent among years. In one of the two study years and in one of the eight populations specifically, the proximal-to-distal decrease in fruit production was dramatic in plants with a large floral display but weak or absent in small displays. Our study demonstrates the intraspecific diversity of fruit distribution patterns in O. militaris. Non-uniform pollination along the inflorescence is likely to be responsible for the parabolic pattern, while irregular visitation could explain the non-directional pattern of fruit production. Pattern variation among years and between populations could arise from spatiotemporal variation in pollinator assemblages. Resource competition effects could explain the interaction effect between display size and flower position.