{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01487778958554729, 'fraction_numerical': 0.025504782146652496, 'mean_word_length': 5.1568627450980395, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A INELEGIBILIDIADE DO CHEFE DO PODER EXECUTIVO MUNICIPAL À LUZ DA CONSTITUIÇÃO FEDERAL DE 1988

The purpose of this article is to analyze the ineligibility of the Chief of the Municipal Executive in the light of the Federal Constitution of 1988, specifically checking which body is responsible for recognizing the Mayor as ineligible, whether it is the Court of Auditors or the City Council. Initially, the Court of Auditors was approached in the 1988 Constitution. Then, there was a distinction between two types of accounts that are provided by the Municipal Manager: government accounts and management accounts. Afterwards, it was discussed whether the prior opinion of the Court of Auditors is opinionated or binding. Finally, there was an analysis of Extraordinary Resources 848826 and 729744. The applied methodology is clearly bibliographic, based on the absorption of information based on books and articles specialized in the theme.