{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03468780971258672, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015857284440039643, 'mean_word_length': 5.824324324324325, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Categories of Social Behavior

The objective of the present study was to provide a set of basic dimensions for characterizing social behavior. Investigators of social behavior have consistently found three dimensions of social evaluation: power, affection (i.e., positive-negative evaluation), and contribution to group tasks (Bales, 1968). Carter (1954) reviewed a number of studies in which investigators factor analyzed participants’ ratings of each other’s social behavior following a group discussion. In each case, investigators reported three factors similar to those mentioned above. Couch (1960) factor analyzed a number of variables, including overt social behavior as measured by Bales’ (1950) Interaction Process Analysis, personality measures, and postdiscussion participant ratings. Again, the analysis yielded the three factors of power, affection, and contribution to group tasks. Despite the consistency of these findings, a number of difficulties with participant ratings and the Interaction