{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01263157894736842, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.52054794520548, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Under the Microscope:

Geodemographic classifications have been used in the UK for the last twenty years and have contributed to countless targeting projects. They have helped in planning site locations for numerous retailers – the total value of these investment decisions alone must surely run into billions of pounds. Yet where is the proof that geodemographics can actually predict how markets are geographically distributed, and which classification approach works best?