{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02157164869029276, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001027221366204417, 'mean_word_length': 5.811188811188811, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Interaction of amoebapores and NK-lysin with symmetric phospholipid and asymmetric lipopolysaccharide/phospholipid bilayers.

Amoebapores from protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica and NK-lysin of porcine cytotoxic lymphocytes belong to the same family of saposin-like proteins. In addition to the structural similarity, amoebapores and NK-lysin are both highly effective against prokaryotic and eukaryotic target cells in that they permeabilize the target cell membranes. Here, we have investigated in detail the protein/lipid interaction for the three isoforms of amoebapore and NK-lysin. Results obtained from electrical measurements on planar bilayer membranes, including reconstitution models of the lipid matrix of the outer membrane of Escherichia coli and phospholipid membranes, fluorescence energy transfer spectroscopy with liposomes, and monolayer measurements on a Langmuir trough, provided information on lipid preferences, pH dependences, and membrane interaction mechanisms. The three amoebapores led to the formation of transient pores with similar characteristics in conductance, sublevels, and lifetime for the different isoforms. The conductance of the pores was dependent on the polarity of the applied clamp voltage, and the distribution of the sublevels was affected by the value of the clamp voltage. The size of the pores and distribution of conductance sublevels differed between symmetric phospholipid and asymmetric lipopolysaccharide/phospholipid bilayers. Notably, NK-lysin caused the formation of well-defined pores, which were lipid- and voltage-dependent, and their characteristics differed from those induced by amoebapores; e.g., the protein concentration necessary to induce pore formation was 20 times higher. The biophysical data give important information on the mode of action of these small effector proteins, which may further lead to a better understanding of peptide-membrane interactions in general.