{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.010905125408942203, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.12, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The importance of re-affirming IR’s disciplinary status

ability to contribute to issues relevant in and outside of the academic sphere, and the representational and political power implied in the notion of ‘discipline’. While the experiences captured in this Forum are largely European and North American we hope that this Forum will operate as a reference point for future debate that seeks to discuss this question with increasingly diversified perspectives. This debate and its continuation is of timely importance and requires further discussion due to the way IR continues to expand institutionally and diversify globally because it is often not clear what is exactly being broadened or at what cost. It is these questions that this Forum seeks to address in order to capture a number of current perspectives and institutional insights and to show that much rests on the debate about IR’s disciplinary identity.