{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015804597701149427, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.394495412844036, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Ancient Andean space and architecture: new syntheses and debates

the problems and opportunities posed by application of scientific dating methods. When that happens, then, perhaps, it may be possible to talk about an archaeology of time. These books provide suggestive indications of how the field of study might develop, but the hard work of producing a distinctively archaeological conception of time and temporality as opposed to conceptions borrowed from neighbouring intellectual disciplines, whether they deal with the much shorter time ranges and higher resolution of the recent past or with non-human phenomena on the vaster time scales of geological time, has scarcely begun. References