{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.045845272206303724, 'fraction_numerical': 0.015759312320916905, 'mean_word_length': 4.845188284518828, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Cost-effectiveness of partial versus stepwise caries removal of deep caries lesions - a decision-analytic approach.

OBJECTIVE
The aim was to compare the cost-effectiveness of partial caries removal (PCR) and stepwise caries removal (SW) in mature permanent teeth diagnosed with deep caries lesions, in a Swedish Public Dental Care organization.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
A decision tree model was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness for PCR and SW. Probability values were obtained through a literature search in PubMed and Scopus. Treatment times were estimated by a group of dentists practicing at public dental care clinics in Västra Götaland county, Sweden.


RESULTS
The expected costs for PCR and SW were 187,63 and 414,35 €, respectively, indicating that PCR was more cost-effective. Four articles were identified through the literature search. The p-values for PCR outcomes were 94% (success), 0% (pulp exposure) and 6% (pulpitis/apical periodontitis etc.). For SW, the p-values were 76% (success), 2% (pulp exposure during the first visit), 13% (pulp exposure during the second visit) and 9% (pulpitis/apical periodontitis etc.).


CONCLUSIONS
Given the presumptions in this decision analysis, the PCR method used on mature permanent teeth is more cost-effective (p < ,05) compared to the SW method in protecting the pulp from exposure and avoiding the need for root canal treatment.