{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.020594965675057208, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013729977116704805, 'mean_word_length': 4.9908675799086755, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Hospital monitoring of pressure ulcers in the UK.

Hospital trusts and health authorities are increasingly being expected to report on numbers of patients with pressure ulcers. Although pressure ulcer audits should be undertaken in a systematic way, there are no agreed standards and little is known about the current status of pressure ulcer monitoring. A postal survey was conducted to establish a national picture of both assessment and audit of pressure ulcers. Questionnaires were sent to 276 acute hospital trusts throughout the UK; 204 were returned, giving a response rate of 74%. Fewer than half of the trusts (40%) employed a tissue viability nurse, and 28.5% of respondents were another type of clinical nurse specialist. Most hospitals used single scales for grading pressure ulcers and risk assessment but the frequency and method of such surveys varied considerably. Relatively few hospitals (5%) monitored the number of pressure ulcers on a daily basis, 30% made some form of weekly return and 22% made monthly returns. The authors conclude that there are national variations with respect to the pressure ulcer assessment tools used to provide audit data, and to the methodology and documentation used to collate data. A national consensus is recommended on auditing of pressure ulcers in the UK.