{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013157894736842105, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0430622009569378, 'mean_word_length': 4.617449664429531, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The asymmetric effect of the business cycle on poverty in Argentina

After the crisis of 2002, Argentina started a process of strong recovery of
 the social indicators, which slowed from 2007 and has stagnated since 2012.
 The present situation is slightly better in relation to the 1990s, but worse
 if the comparison is made with the 1980s and the 1970s. Despite the high
 growth rates experienced until 2011, income distribution was the main cause
 of improvement in poverty and extreme poverty measures. This article
 examines the risk of reversing in the coming years part of the recovery
 achieved. This risk is based on the possible asymmetric effect of the
 business cycle on social indicators, analyzed through the income and income
 distribution elasticities of poverty and extreme poverty estimated for the
 2003-2017 period.