{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03513513513513514, 'fraction_numerical': 0.027702702702702704, 'mean_word_length': 5.119834710743802, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
VCAM-1 is more effective than MAdCAM-1 in supporting eosinophil rolling under conditions of shear flow.

The ability of the alpha4 integrin counterligands vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 or mucosal addressin (MAd)CAM-1 to support eosinophil rolling or firm adhesion under conditions of physiologic flow has not been delineated. Using a parallel plate flow chamber in vitro and intravital microscopy in vivo, we demonstrate that eosinophil rolling and adhesion on VCAM-1 is mediated by both alpha4beta1 and alpha4beta7 integrins. Eosinophils rolled equally efficiently on both VCAM-1 2 domain and VCAM-1 7 domain, suggesting that the N-terminal 2 domains of VCAM-1 are sufficient to support eosinophil rolling under conditions of flow. Furthermore, activation of the eosinophil beta1 integrin with monoclonal antibody (mAb) 8A2 resulted in both resistance to shear stress-induced detachment from VCAM-1 in vitro and in stable arrest of rolling eosinophils on interleukin (IL)-1beta-stimulated venules in vivo. Eosinophils rolled less efficiently on MAdCAM-1- than on VCAM-1-coated coverslips under conditions of flow. However, eosinophils firmly adhered as efficiently to MAdCAM-1 as to VCAM-1. Overall, these results demonstrate that both VCAM-1 and MAdCAM-1 can support eosinophil firm adhesion under conditions of flow. In contrast, VCAM-1 is significantly more efficient than MAdCAM-1 in supporting eosinophil rolling under conditions of flow. (Blood. 2000;95:592-601)