{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04173913043478261, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.538461538461538, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
There is no choice.

If covert video surveillance of patients is occurring, nurses should be involved, provided it is planned and given the same ethical criteria as, say, clinical trials. Nurses cannot say, 'I don't like it, so I'm not taking part'. Nobody is happy about it, but it is an exceptional method, used in exceptional circumstances, to counter exceptional problems, such as child abuse or Munchausen's syndrome-by-proxy. We don't have a choice. The alternative might be to allow a patient to be abused or even killed within the supposedly safe walls of a hospital.