{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029218407596785977, 'fraction_numerical': 0.028487947406866325, 'mean_word_length': 4.780590717299578, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Vergence Position of Rest: Spontaneous Variability

Background: We determined the vergence position of rest (horizontal component) in two sessions, 1 to 6 weeks apart. Each session contained 8 trials. Twenty observers with normal eyes looked through Risley prisms that allowed a continuous modulation of their strength. We asked the observers to look at a fully fusionable picture, and to adjust the prisms such that viewing appeared most relaxing. The viewing distances were 400 cm and 50 cm. Results: The standard deviation among the 8 trials of each session, averaged over the two sessions, the viewing distances of 400 cm and 50 cm, and the 20 observers, was ±1.4 prism dioptres (cm/m). From the first session to the second, many observers changed the preferred prism significantly. At a viewing distance of 400 cm, 10 of 20 observers changed their preferred prism by more than 1.0 prism diopter, up to 3.3 prism diopters. At a viewing distance of 50 cm, 11 of 20 observers changed their preferred prism by more than 1.0 prism diopter, up to 5.1 prism diopters. Conclusions: The prismatic strength estimated as being most relaxing can be very variable. Before considering a prescription, the practitioner should determine whether the preferred prismatic strength remains reasonably stable. To ascertain this consistency, more than one session seems to be necessary.