{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01762114537444934, 'fraction_numerical': 0.013215859030837005, 'mean_word_length': 4.617283950617284, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Reaction to Radu Judgment of the Oberlandesgericht of Munich of 15 May 2013

We publish a short version of the above judgment at the request of and as translated by the reporting judge, Professor Joachim Vogel, for no other reasons than that it shows law in action, a judicial reaction to the Radu judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union and, for non-Germans, how German courts structure their judgments. The contents speak for themselves.