{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.017195767195767195, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 6.037209302325581, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Fertility preserving treatment for gynecologic malignancies: a review of recent literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW
A significant number of women diagnosed with a gynecologic malignancy meet criteria for fertility-sparing treatment. Women are continuing to delay childbearing; the importance of fertility-sparing therapy is, therefore, increasing. It is imperative that physicians understand the options for, and limitations of, these treatments.


RECENT FINDINGS
Recent research has demonstrated improved outcomes for endometrial cancer by adding targeted hysteroscopic resection to progestin therapy. Cervical cancer research has focused on oncologic and pregnancy outcomes following management with radical trachelectomy, confirming its safety. Given the high rates of preterm birth following trachelectomy, studies have evaluated the adequacy of fertility counseling prior to treatment, and have looked for predictive factors for preterm birth. Additionally, research has shown a rise in the percentage of women receiving conservative treatment for both endometrial and cervical cancer.


SUMMARY
With an increasing number of women seeking conservative treatment, physicians must understand the safety and implications of such therapy. Retrospective studies have demonstrated the safety of fertility-sparing treatment for both endometrial and cervical cancer; prospective research is currently underway to provide better guidance for future directions of fertility-sparing treatment for gynecologic malignancies.