{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029259896729776247, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03098106712564544, 'mean_word_length': 4.705882352941177, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Staging of cervix cancer using MRT].

In a prospective study the results of FIGO staging and MR staging in uterine cervical carcinoma were compared with the findings of stepwise serial examination of en-bloc-resected specimens in 28 patients. Overall accuracy of MR staging was 59% compared to 41% in FIGO staging. Sensitivity in assessing parametrial tumour extension was 85% in MRI and 64% in clinical examination. Specificity was 74% in MRI and 69% in physical examination. Accuracy in parametrial tumour extension was 67 per cent in FIGO-Classification and 80 per cent in MRI.