{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.032471106219042374, 'fraction_numerical': 0.036873968079251515, 'mean_word_length': 5.0198675496688745, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Effect of root morphology on biomechanical behaviour of premolars associated with abfraction lesions and different loading types.

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behaviour of maxillary premolar teeth regarding root morphology and abfraction depth, submitted to axial and oblique occlusal load. The investigation was conducted using 3D finite element analysis and strain gauge test. Sound maxillary premolar single and double root were selected for 3D model generation. The teeth were scanned for external morphology data acquisition. The 3D geometry was stored in *.STL and exported to Bio-CAD software (Rhinoceros-3D) to model generation. Mesh generation, mechanical properties and boundary conditions were performed in finite element software (Femap, Noran Engineering, USA). Twelve models were generated: sound tooth, 1.25 and 2.5 mm abfraction teeth. 100N compressive static load was applied: axially and 45° angle to the long axis on the palatine surface of the buccal cusp. Two strain gauges were bonded on the teeth mounted in a mechanical testing machine. Von Mises criterion showed that the double-root teeth associated with 2.5 mm abfraction and oblique loading presented higher stress values. Axial loading associated with single-root teeth propitiated the lowest stress rates. Double root sound 1.25 and 2.5 mm abfraction teeth associated with oblique loading showed the highest strain values (μS): 692.6, 1043.31 and 1236.14, respectively. Single root sound 1.25 and 2.5 mm abfraction teeth associated with oblique loading showed 467.10, 401.51 and 420.98 strain values, respectively. Axial loading showed lower strain rates, ranging from 136.12 to 366.91. The association of deep lesions, oblique loading and double-root tooth promoted higher stress and strain concentration.