{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.008639308855291577, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.3561643835616435, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Judicial Support and Criminal Sentencing

This study examines the hypothesis that one reason why criminal trial courts are supported by the public and seen as acting legitimately is that both members of the public and of the judiciary hold common perceptions regarding the principles upon which sentences should be based. It uses Stephenson's Q-Technique and isolates three separate factor types that describe differing subjective views of the sentencing process.