{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033818938605619145, 'fraction_numerical': 0.027575442247658687, 'mean_word_length': 5.163461538461538, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Antiviral suppression vs restoration of RIG-I signaling by hepatitis C protease and polymerase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND & AIMS
Expression of the nonstructural protein (NS)3/4A protease in cells infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) results in cleavage of the mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS) and disruption of signaling pathways that lead to viral activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) and synthesis of type 1 interferons (IFN-alpha/beta). High concentrations of inhibitors of NS3/4A reverse this signaling defect, but quantitative analyses of this potential therapeutic effect are lacking. This study quantitatively assessed the rescue of IRF-3 signaling by NS3/4A inhibitors, compared with in vitro antiviral activity.


METHODS
Antiviral activities of 2 NS3/4A protease inhibitors (TMC435350 and an analog, TMC380765) and a nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitor (Tib-3) were determined in HCV replicon cells and in cells infected with genotype 1a and 2a viruses. The capacity to rescue IRF-3 activation in these cells was assessed by monitoring IFN-beta promoter activity following challenge with Sendai virus. Inhibitor-induced changes in NS3 and MAVS expression were assessed in immunoblots.


RESULTS
Both protease inhibitors were capable of rescuing IFN-beta promoter activation but only at concentrations approximately 100-fold the antiviral 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) for genotype 1 virus. No rescue was observed with the polymerase inhibitor, even at a concentration 600-fold greater than the EC(50). IRF-3 activation did not correlate with reductions in NS3/4A levels or detection of full-length MAVS. Overexpression of the product of NS3/4A cleavage of MAVS did not result in a dominant-negative effect on signaling.


CONCLUSIONS
NS3/4A protease inhibitors can restore IRF-3 signaling in HCV-infected cells but only at concentrations far in excess of the antiviral EC(50).