{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.022900763358778626, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011995637949836423, 'mean_word_length': 4.701863354037267, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 1, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Bacteriological study of the wounds during drainage of the abdominal cavity after operations on the liver and pancreas].

Results of bacteriological studies have shown that the secondary infection of wounds and the abdominal cavity in patients comes through the glove-gauze tampon in 76.9% of cases. The pathogenic microflora comes into the wound and the abdominal cavity by the tampon from the skin under the aseptic adhesive. It occurs much more rarely (7.15% of cases--p < 0.001) if tube drains and active aspiration are used for drainage at the postoperative period. This method of drainage of the abdominal cavity is followed by 3 times less amount of complications than when using the glove-gauze tampons. Tampons should be used for drainage of the abdominal cavity but when hemostasis is not thorough for certain and when it is necessary to delimit the pyo-inflammatory process from the free abdominal cavity.