{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023413897280966767, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.829896907216495, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Why Learning and Machine Learning Are Different

Machine learning intends to be a biology-mimicking learningmethod, implemented bymeans of technical computing. Their technology and methods, however, differ very much; mainly because technological computing is based on the time-unaware classic computing paradigm. Based on the time-aware computing paradigm, the paper discovers the mechanism of biological information storing and learning; furthermore, it explains, why biological and technological information handling and learning are entirely different. The consequences of the huge difference in transmission speed in those computing systems may remain hidden in “toy”-level technological systems but comes to the light in systems having large size and/or mimicking neuronal operations. The biology-mimicking technological operations are in resemblance to the biological operations only when using time-unaware computing paradigm. The difference leads also to the need of introducing “training” mode (with desperately low efficiency) in technological learning, while biological systems have the ability of life-long learning. It is at least misleading to use technological learning methods to complement biological learning studies. The examples show evidence for the effect of transmission time in published experiments.