{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.07116654438738078, 'fraction_numerical': 0.034482758620689655, 'mean_word_length': 4.4649298597194385, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 6, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
CLINICAL APPLICATION OF MULTICOLOR IMAGING IN CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY.

PURPOSE
To characterize features of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) using multicolor (MC) imaging and to compare the efficacy of using MC imaging and traditional color fundus photography (CFP) for detecting features of CSC.


METHODS
A retrospective review of 75 eyes of 69 participants with CSC from the Eye Center of the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The patients underwent same-day CFP, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA), spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and MC imaging (including infrared reflectance (IR), green reflectance (GR), blue reflectance (BR), combined standard MC image, and green-blue-enhanced image). Positive CSC lesions were evaluated using FFA and SD-OCT. Features in images of CFP, standard MC, green-blue-enhanced, IR, GR, and BR were analyzed and calculated.


RESULTS
Among the 75 eyes of 69 patients, 75 eyes with subretinal fluid (SRF) and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) leakage point, and 43 eyes with RPE damage were observed by FFA and SD-OCT. The detection rate of SRF was significantly higher with the standard MC image (92.0%), green-blue-enhanced image (92.0%), IR (88.0%), and GR (88.0%) than that with CFP (66.7%) (P < 0.05). Blue reflectance (45.3%) was associated with lower rate of SRF detection compared to CFP (P < 0.05). The standard MC image (84.0%), green-blue-enhanced image (84.0%), IR (78.7%), and GR (80%) delineated the boundaries of SRF more effectively than CFP (44%). The abnormal areas corresponding to RPE leakage points on FFA were observed with the standard MC image, green-blue-enhanced image, and IR at detection rates of 90.7, 82.7, and 90.7%, respectively, which were significantly higher than with CFP (29.3%) (P < 0.05). However, the detection rates of the abnormalities corresponding to leakage on FFA were lower with GR (5.3%) and BR (1.3%) than those with CFP (P < 0.05). Areas of RPE damage on FFA were observed at the same locations with the standard MC image, green-blue-enhanced image, and IR at detection rates of 97.7, 93.0, and 95.3%, respectively, which were significantly higher than with CFP (41.9%) (P < 0.05). Compared with CFP, the detectable rates of RPE damage on GR (14.0%) and BR (9.3%) were lower (P < 0.05).


CONCLUSION
As an adjunct to SD-OCT, the MC image can delineate the extent or boundaries of SRF more effectively than CFP. As an adjunct to FFA, the MC image can identify foci of leakage more effectively than CFP. The MC image, particularly the IR channel, can identify areas of RPE damage more effectively than CFP. Therefore, the MC image may be a useful adjunct to FFA and OCT for detecting or monitoring CSC.