{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016553067185978577, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0038948393378773127, 'mean_word_length': 5.506329113924051, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Impact of chromogranin A measurement in the work-up of neuroendocrine tumors.

Since the development of the first immunoassay for circulating chromogranin A in 1984, a lot of studies have evaluated its clinical impact in neuroendocrine tumors. Initially studied in pheochromocytoma patients, the clinical impact of chromogranin A has rapidly extended to most neuroendocrine tumours, sometimes in combination with other eutopic or ectopic secretions. In our experience, CgA demonstrates a variable sensitivity between NET primary and a high specificity. Our results suggest that CgA should be routinely screened in foregut-derived NET and abandoned in the routine screening of medullary thyroid carcinoma. In addition, in phaeochromocytoma and ileum-NET patients, CgA demonstrates a comparable sensitivity with urinary reference markers and its impact on the follow-up will form a key point when recommending routine screening. Both tumor burden and secretory activity should be taken into account when interpreting CgA results.