{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0416210295728368, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03176341730558598, 'mean_word_length': 5.0131578947368425, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Interaction times in quantum scattering: The sojourn-time-operator approach versus the Feynman path-integral approach.

A ready comparison of the two methods noted in the title is obscured by the very different formalisms that they employ. Our sojourn-time approach [Jaworski and Wardlaw, Phys. Rev. A 45, 292 (1992)] is based on a Hermitian sojourn-time operator in the framework of time-dependent scattering theory whereas Sokolovski and co-workers [Sokolovski and Baskin, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4604 (1987); Sokolovski and Connor, ibid. 42, 6512 (1990)] have developed an approach based on the Feynman path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics. By translating the path-integral approach into the language of wave functions and linear operators, we reveal the similarities of the two approaches and show that the results for the interaction times are closely related, becoming equivalent in the asymptotic limit.