{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023485204321277594, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.454545454545454, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Book Review: Outsmarting the Riptide of Domestic Violence: Metaphor and Mindfulness for Change

relatively unfamiliar with other materials covered in the book. For example, a feminist psychologist will be knowledgeable about theories of gender but may be relatively inexperienced with discursive psychological research. Again, Magnusson and Marecek’s discussion of epistemology and methodology is very clearly articulated and is well situated within a larger feminist psychological perspective. Ultimately, however, the short explanations are strengths of the book; the authors provide just enough information to allow a reader to know whether she or he would like to learn more. This also holds for their discussion of specific research projects. They provide enough information for a reader to decide whether she or he would like to read the original sources to learn more about the research topic or methods. The fourth section of the book provides critiques of the knowledge that psychology produces and could be useful for feminist therapists (e.g., critiques on psychiatric diagnosis) and researchers alike (e.g., sex difference research). Magnusson and Marecek conclude their book with a chapter on ‘‘disciplinary reflexivity,’’ including a discussion of the importance of ‘‘scrutinizing one’s own discipline,’’ which they do in the previous three chapters. The final chapter’s critique could be especially helpful to feminist psychologists who would like to clearly articulate some of the limitations of psychology’s standard operating procedures to psychology students and colleagues alike. In sum, Magnusson and Marecek provide clear explanations of important concepts related to gender and culture, a succinct introduction to feminist interpretive and discursive research methods with examples of research projects completed in this tradition, and a useful critique of psychology as a discipline. All of this however is, by design, only an introduction. It will be important for readers to follow-up Gender and Culture in Psychology with additional reading to gain more in-depth understandings of the topics addressed.