{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.025543497225808703, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02425236416931291, 'mean_word_length': 4.7953488372093025, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 1, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Grain Yield Gains and Associated Traits in Tropical X Temperate Maize Germplasm Under High and Low Plant Density

Development of ideal breeding and crop management strategies that can improve maize grain yield under tropical environments is crucial. In the temperate regions, such yield improvements were achieved through use of genotypes that adapt high plant population density stress. However, tropical germplasm has poor tolerance to high plant population density stress, and thus it should be improved by temperate maize. The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic gains and identify traits associated with such gains in stable and high yielding temperate x tropical hybrids under low and high plant population densities. A total of 200 hybrids derived from a line x tester mating design of tropical x temperate germplasm were developed. These hybrids were evaluated for grain yield and allied traits under varied plant population densities. High yielding and stable hybrids, such as 15XH214, 15XH215 and 15XH121 were resistant to lodging and had higher number of leaves above the cob. The high genetic gains of 26% and desirable stress tolerance indices of these hybrids made them better performers over check hybrids under high plant population density. At high plant population density yield was correlated to stem lodging and number of leaves above the cob. Future gains in grain yield of these hybrids derived from temperate x tropical maize germplasm can be achieved by exploiting indirect selection for resistance to stem lodging and increased number of leaves above the cob under high plant density conditions.


Introduction
Increasing maize yield under stress and non-stress conditions is important in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) (Masuka et al. 2017). Tolerance to higher planting densities has contributed to yield increase in temperate germplasm (Duvick 2005). High population density is an important factors limiting maize production in SSA, because as the number of plants in a planting pattern increases, distance between plants decreases and competition for water and nutrients among individuals increases (Lee and Tollenaar 2007). Maize yield improvement has been strongly associated with improvements in stress tolerance, particularly to increased interplant competition (Duvick 2005). As a result, modern hybrids are able to produce kernels at high plant population densities. A stress tolerant index (STI) is more useful in order to select favourable maize hybrids under stress and non-stress conditions. Rosielle and Hamblin (1981) suggested stress tolerance index and de ned it as the difference between the production obtained in conditions without stress (Yp) and stress (Ys).
Breeding for direct increase in maize grain yield is complicated due to the fact that maize grain yield is the end-product of interactions among many contributing traits (Raghu et al. 2011). An alteration in a particular trait results in changes in another trait as explained by Ahmad and Saleem (2003). In order to improve gains from selection, it is desirable to have positive signi cant correlations between yield and agronomic characteristics that contribute towards higher yield (Gasura et al. 2014). Yusuf (2010) observed several positively correlated secondary traits, such as number of leaves per plant with plant height, days to silking with tasselling, and plant height with ear height. These pairs of correlated traits could be simultaneously selected for. Knowledge of the association of yield components can improve selection e ciency (Raghu et al. 2011). Path coe cient analysis is a statistical method capable of partitioning correlations into direct and indirect effects, as well as distinguishing between correlation and causation (Singh and Chaudhary 2004). Path coe cient estimates are useful in understanding the contribution and roles played by different plant traits in establishing growth pattern and behaviour in a particular environment (Gasura et al. 2014).
A successful plant breeding program is directly related to the superiority of the new cultivars. Studies have shown that the average annual maize yield gain is around 2% (Masuka et al. 2017). Cardwell (1982) showed that the annual maize yield increase in Minnesota was 85 kg ha − 1 , with 43% of this increase due to the introduction of new cultivars. Studies done by Masuka et al (2017) showed that genetic gains are different across contrasting environments and that genetic gains are higher in environments that do not cause any type of stress. The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic gains and identify traits associated with such gains in stable and high yielding temperate x tropical maize hybrids.

Germplasm
In this study, inbred lines were derived from F 2 -crosses between tropical and temperate lines. The USA temperate lines contributed genes for early physiological maturity and good standing ability (stiff stalk source), while the tropical germplasm lines provided water stress tolerance. Self-pollination was applied to advance the materials with concomitant pedigree selection for good agronomic traits and seed parent characteristics. This was achieved in a extensively for the three previous years (11C1774, 11C1579, 11C2245, 11C1483 and 10HDTX11) in the East and Western South Africa were included as additional control hybrids to obtain the desired 100 entries for the study based on each tester.

Site and test environment description
The hybrids were evaluated across three sites in KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa, during the 2014/15 summer cropping season. The sites used were Ukulinga Research Farm (UKZN), Dundee Research Station (28° 10' 13.1219'' S and 30° 31' 45.2365'' E) and Cedara Research Station (29° 32' 38.1624'' S and 30° 15' 59.8536'' E). The geographical description for the three sites is presented in Table 1. Four test environments, which were designated as Env-1 to Env-4, were created for the study by varying the population density of the hybrids at Ukulinga Farm, resulting in two testing environments at that station (Table 1 and  10.32 ppm available phosphorous (P), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 22.34 (meq/100 g). However it is susceptible to cracking and crusting under ooding. Cedara Research Station is characterised by sandy clay soils which are reasonably fertile and well drained. Chances of ooding were very low due to a good slope and ground cover. The elds at Ukulinga 1 and 2, and Dundee planting elds were ploughed and disced before planting although minimum tillage was done at Cedara. The Cedara eld had high organic matter from the stover of preceding maize crop. The ground cover also provided mulch and helped in moisture conservation.

Experimental design and management
The testcrosses were organised into two trials based on the tester, hence two eld trials were conducted at each of the three different locations and test environments at Ukulinga Farm, during the 2014/15 summer season in KwaZulu natal, South Africa. The 100 entries in two replicates for the Tester 9 and DTAB32 testcrosses and seven control hybrids were laid out as 10 x 10 simple lattice design at all sites and test environments. Plot sizes at each site had single rows of 5m long but the spacing varied as follows: 0.9 m inter-row spacing and 0.3 m intra-row spacing at Dundee and Ukulinga 1 and 2, and 0.75 m inter-row and 0.3 m intra-row at Cedara. The plots were 17 planting stations per row resulting in 34 plants before thinning at all sites and test environments. This is because two seeds were planted per station by hand and later thinned down to one at 21 days after planting to give the desired plant population of 44,444 and 37,037 plants per hectare, at Cedara and Ukulinga 1, respectively. The second planting was not thinned at Ukulinga 2 and Dundee research station resulting in a population density of 74,074 plants per hectare. This was considered to be high plant population density because the average planting density for the area is 37,000 to 45,000 plants per hectare. In the elds where thinning was done, the rst and the last stations in the rows were not thinned to minimise the competition advantages along the edges. The experiments at Cedara and Dundee had two border rows planted at either side of the eld, while at Ukulinga 1 and Ukulinga 2 there was one border row on both sides.
Experimental management including fertilizer, chemical and herbicide application and weed control followed standard practice for maize trials. The experiments were conducted under rain fed conditions at all sites. The total amount of the monthly rainfall for the growing season and the temperature range data is shown in Table 1. Fertilizer was applied as basal at planting in the form of compound (NPK) 2:3:4 at 250 kg ha -1 (56 kg ha -1 of N, 83 kg ha -1 of P and 111 kg ha -1 of K). Nitrogen fertilizer was applied at four weeks after crop emergence in the form of LAN (Lime Ammonium Nitrate, 28% N) at the rate of 250 kg ha -1 . The herbicides, Gramoxone, Dual, Basagran, and 2,4-D were applied to control weeds. This was augmented by hand weeding to keep the elds relatively clean of weeds throughout the season. Insecticide granules were applied in the maize leaf whorls for stalk borer control. An insecticide, Karate, was applied to control cutworms at planting and seedling emergence.

Data collection
Data for maize traits was collected following the standard protocols which are used at International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) (Magorokosho et al. 2009). Data recorded on yield and related component traits. Grain yield was estimated using the measured eld weight as cob weight per plot adjusted to 12.5 % grain moisture content and 80 % shelling percentage using the following formula: GYG = Field weight (kg) * 10 000 m 2 * (100 -MOI) * shelling % / 1000 (kg) * plot area (m 2 ) * (100 -12.5) %, where: GYG = Calculated grain yield per ha, MOI = measured grain moisture content at harvest, shelling % = assumed to be 80% for all genotypes. Anthesis-silking interval (ASI) (days) was determined by nding the difference between the number of days after planting when 50% of the plants shed pollen (anthesis date, AD) and the number of days after planting when 50% of the plants show silks (silking date, SD). Grain moisture content (MOI) was measured as percentage water content of grain measured at harvest using the moisture meter (Eaton, Model 500). Root lodging (RL) was measured as a percentage of plants that showed lodging by being inclined 45°. Stem lodging (SL) was measured as a percentage of plants that were broken below the ear. Total plant lodging (TL) was measured as the percentage mean value of the root and stem lodging. Number of tassel branches (NTB) was measured by counting the number of the main tassel branches. Number of leaves above the cob (NLAC) was measured by counting all the main leaves above the cob. DCD = was determined as the number of days when 50% of the ears in a plot dries, calculated from day of planting to drying.

Data analysis
Analysis of variance, hybrid ranking and genetic gains Analysis of variance was conducted using Genstat Software for all traits. Hybrids were ranked according to grain yield from the highest yielding to the lowest yielding hybrids across all the sites and within sites. The gains were estimated as a difference in yield between the experimental hybrids and checks, and this was expressed as a percentage. Stress tolerance index was estimated based on formula suggested by Bouslama and Schapaugh (1984) by nding the quotient between the hybrid mean yield under stress condition and the mean yield under the optimal condition according to the formula: where, STI = stress tolerance index, Ys = mean of the hybrid under stress condition, Ypi = mean of the hybrids under optimal condition.

Correlation and path coe cient analysis
The phenotypic correlation coe cients between secondary traits and grain yield were calculated using Genstat software as described by Singh and Chaudhary (2004). The PATHSAS micros was used with the Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) version 9.3 for the phenotypic path analysis.

Hybrid ranking
Under Tester 9, hybrid number 79 (15XH121) and hybrid number 100 (BG5285) were the best in most environments and hybrid 79 was the most stable across low and high plant population density (Table 3). Under DTAB32, hybrids 179 (15XH214) and 180 (15XH215) outperformed the rest in most environments and were the most stable and high yielding across low and high plant population density (Table 4).

Stress tolerance index
Hybrids such as 15XH121 had a high stress tolerant index of 0.70, comparable to the check hybrid BG5285 (hybrid 100) that had a stress tolerant index of 0.78. It has also previously been reported that when STI is ≥ 1.0, it indicates that a genotype is tolerant, while it is sensitive when STI is ≤ 1.0 (Table 5).

Selection and realized breeding gains
Under low plant population density (Table 6), the grain yield mean values ranged from 11.69 to 12.13 t ha -1 among the top-yielding hybrids. The mean of top ve selected hybrids (11.89 t ha -1 ) out-yielded the mean of advanced check hybrids (9.78 t ha -1 ). There was a 16.70 % more grain yield gained over the population mean. Positive breeding gains were also obtained for most of the desired agronomic traits (Table 6). There were signi cant genetic gains in grain yield, number of ears per plant, ear position, grain moisture content, ear and plant height, root lodging, stem lodging and total plant lodging for selected hybrids against mean of the checks (Table 6).
Under high plant population density, the mean grain yield values ranged from 11.44 to 12.04 t ha -1 among the top-yielding hybrids ( Table 7). All the selected experimental top ve hybrids (11.62 t ha -1 ) out-yielded the commercial check hybrids (10.68 t ha -1 ) across sites. The top ve selected experimental hybrids (11.62 t ha -1 ) also out-yielded the advanced check hybrids (8.59 t ha -1 ). There was a 22.70 % grain yield gained over the population mean (Table 7). There were signi cant genetic gains of selected hybrids in all the traits except for number of tassel branches and number of leaves above the cob when assessed against the population mean and the mean of all the checks (Table 7). Root lodging, plant height, anthesis silking interval, number of tassel branched and number of leaves above the cob achieved signi cant genetic loss against mean of the commercial checks, but, grain yield, ear height, days to anthesis, ear position, ear proli cacy, grain moisture content, stem lodging, total plant lodging and days to 50 % cob dryness exhibited signi cant gains (Table 7).

Correlation and path coe cient analysis between yield and yield related traits in maize hybrids
Under high plant population density, EPP and NTB did not contribute to grain yield across both testers and within each tester. Number of leaves above the cob (NLAC) had a huge direct effect (0.30) on grain yield under low and high plant population density across testers (Table 8 and Table 9). Stem lodging had indirect effects on grain yield under high plant population density across testers. Root lodging had a huge direct effect (0.35) on grain yield under high plant population density across testers. The direct and indirect effects for EPP, DCD, TL, EH, EPO, PH, AD, ASI, NP and PopDen were inconsistent across different plant population densities and within testers. Across testers, under low plant population density NTB and MOI had direct effects of (-0.16) and (0.23) on grain yield, respectively, whereas RL had indirect effects on grain yield via NP. At high plant population density across all testers, DCD and RL had direct effects on grain yield while MOI and DCD had indirect effects on grain yield (Table 9).

Discussion
Hybrids evaluated performed differently thus raising an opportunity to perform selection of genotypes for advancement. The outstanding performance of the experimental hybrids over checks (Table 3 and Table 4) is a good indication of signi cant genetic improvements, because these hybrids out-performed variety (BG5285) which is a widely grown hybrid in South Africa. Results indicated a progress in breeding for high population density stress tolerance and high yield potential in the new maize hybrids 15XH215, 15XH214 and 15XH121. Temperate germplasm is resistant to abiotic stresses such root and stem lodging and has high grain yield potential under high population density. In South Africa, DAFF (2014) reported that there are farmers practising high, low and medium plant density culture. Thus, selected hybrids 15XH215 and 15XH214 under high plant population density stress can be recommended under irrigation since they showed potential to respond positively to improved environmental conditions. However, hybrids 15XH121 and 15XH65 speci cally performed well under low plant population density conditions, thus, these hybrids can be recommended for use in western part of South Africa where low plant population density cultural practise is applied.
The study revealed genetic gains of at least 26% for yield under high plant density through breeding from temperate x tropical germplasm populations. Positive genetic gains were observed for secondary traits that are associated with yield in the temperate x tropical germplasm populations. Genetic gains were also observed with respect to early physiological maturity of maize hybrids. The earliness of maize can be measured using physiological maturity where longseason hybrids reach maturity in 140-150 days, medium-season hybrids in 130-145 and short season hybrids in 115-130 days (Gasura et al. 2014) depending on the altitude. In the current study, hybrids which attained days to silking and anthesis less than those of PAN6Q-345 CB, between 70 and 71, under DTAB32 and 68 to 70 under Tester 9, had grain moisture content below 12.5%, and were considered to be early maturing. These hybrids include 10HDTX11 and the rest which poorly performed in terms of grain yield. Unfortunately the earlier the hybrid, the low the grain yield potential. This proves to be the main challenge of breeding for early-maturing maize which is the negative correlation between yield and early physiological maturity (Gasura et al. 2014).
Differences in ranking of genotypes under high and low plant population density implied differential yield performance among the maize genotypes as a result of the signi cant cross over genotype by environment interaction (GxE) (Yan and Tinker 2006). The G x E may be managed by using speci c cultivars for each environment or exploited by using cultivars with wide adaptability. In this study entries 79 (15XH121), 179 (15XH215) and 180 (15XH214) were the most ideal genotypes across stress levels in terms of high mean grain yield and stability. These hybrids could also have the greatest commercial success because they showed the high stability across stress levels (Abay et al. 2009). Grain yield stability is a highly heritable trait (Yan and Tinker, 2006) and most genotypes that tolerate stress have been associated with high grain yield stability. Rossini  Similarly, the current study showed high yield among the stable varieties to be associated with increased plant density. This indicates that productivity of hybrids derived from the tropical x temperate germplasm genetic backgrounds can be enhanced by selecting for high yield under high density stress.
Some hybrids had high stress tolerance indices, a parameter which shows the relationship in performance of yield under stress condition and non-stress. The yield gains observed among the selected hybrids could be attributed to their yield stability due to their high stress tolerance index due to resistance to stem lodging. These hybrids have several desirable attributes that give them high yield and stability better than the existing commercial hybrids. Indeed most of these hybrids were derived from the DTAB32 which is associated with a huge contribution to stress resistance including resistance to lodging. This agrees with reports in the literature with respect to temperate maize germplasm. Past genetic gains in modern hybrids were associated with tolerance to stress (Duvick 2005) and that include tolerance to high plant population density as reported by many researchers (Rossini et al. 2011;Yan et al. 2011;Ray et al. 2012). Genetic advance is the expected genetic progress resulting from selection of the best-performing genotypes for a given character. Currently, it can be concluded that the highest density (74 000 plants per ha) is still below the potential maximum yield densities because some plants could still produce more than one cob, an indicator of reduced stress. This indicated that the hybrids could still produce high yield at higher density levels. Future studies should test these hybrids at higher densities.

Relationships of grain yield and related traits under different plant densities and testers
Direct and indirect effects from this study were ranked similar to those of Lenka and Mishra (1973), as follows: 0.00 to 0.09 = negligible, 0.10 to 0.19 = low, 0.20 to 0.29 = moderate and > 0.30 = high path coe cients. Traits such as number of days to 50% cob dryness, total plant lodging, ear height, ear position, plant height, days to anthesis, anthesis-silking interval, number of plants per plot and plant population density were not associated with grain yield, suggesting that they are not ideal candidates to utilize during breeding for stress tolerance in this population of temperate x tropical germplasm lines. Directional selection from plant breeding overtime has resulted in the reduction of genetic variability for some important traits. Lee and Tollenaar (2007) noted that not all traits are useful in the current and future breeding of maize because of lack of enough variability.
Number of ears per plant and number of tassel branches were highly correlated with grain yield and had huge positive direct effects on grain yield under low plant population density. Number of ears per plant and number of tassel branches are parameters associated with high nutrition which is associated with low plant population density. This explains why number of ears per plant and number of tassel branches were high under low plant population density. However, in breeding for increased grain yield under stress it will be ideal to improve the number of ears per plant while reducing the number of tassel branches. Mostafavi et al (2013) noted ear proli cacy to be highly signi cant and to have a positive correlation with grain yield in maize. Grain yield is the key trait in maizebreeding programmes (Peng et al. 2011). However, for it to be improved to a greater extent, the contribution of other allied traits, such as the number of ears per plant and number of tassel branches must be considered. Tassels are normally strong sinks in maize nutrition due to their apical dominance and if the number of tassel branches increase they may also result in reduced grain yield. Normally only adequate (not excess) pollen grains are required in pollination. Sangoi (2002) asserted that genotypes with many tassel branches are likely to have reduced grain yield due to suppression of ear development and high assimilate expenditure for head maintenance.
Number of leaves above the cob is one of the most important traits in maize grain lling. Under both low and high plant population density, number of leaves above the cob was highly correlated with grain yield with a positive direct effect on maize grain yield suggesting the importance of these trait under this conditions. In line with the study by Alvim et al (2011) which found that grain lling is only affected by the leaves above the cob and leaves located above the cob provide most of the photo-assimilates necessary for grain lling in the ear. Thus the more and the bigger the leaves above the cob the better the e ciency of grain lling (Gasura et al. 2014). Under stress conditions the leaves are reduced and genotypes that maintain relatively more and bigger leaves above the cob will be better in terms of the e ciency of grain lling. In breeding for maize with better yield under stress it will be logical to select genotypes with more and bigger leaves above the ear. Furthermore, selection of plants that have more of erectophile type of leaves is desirable since this can reduce mutual shading but rather increase light penetration into the canopy (Brekke et al. 2011;Edwards, 2011). Hammer et al (2009), showed that erectophile leaves reduce canopy light extinction coe cient, increased light penetration to lower leaves, and enabled more uniform photosynthetic rates within the canopy. DTAB32 contributed more to number of leaves above the cob, and this tester is well known for its wide adaptability across different production conditions.
In order to improve gains from selection, it is desirable to have positive signi cant correlations between yield and agronomic characteristics that contribute towards higher yield. Stem lodging and root lodging had indirect effects on grain yield because this trait reduces the number of plants per hectare and bareness (reduced EPP) and thus grain yield. Tokatlidis and Koutroubas (2004) observed the adverse effects of high plant population densities on maize grain yield stability because of high incidence of root and stem lodging and increased barrenness. Grain yield is mainly a function of the number of plants per hectare. The purpose of increasing plant population density is to improve of the number of plants per hectare and thus grain yield. However, lodging has a negative effect of this approach because it reduces the number of plants per hectare. If lodging occurs before grain lling the, lodged plants suffer shading and may not produce grains at all. If lodging occurs after grain lling, the fallen plants may not be harvested by the combine harvester. In general, under high plant population density grain yield was low as compared to low plant population density for certain hybrids. Stem lodging had indirect effects on grain yield under high plant population density. Hashemi et al (2005) also stated that maize grain yield declines when plant density is increased beyond the optimum plant density primarily because of decline in the harvest index and increased stem lodging. In most cases, farmers in sub-Saharan Africa plant more plants per unit areas and they get less yield because the current hybrids on the market are not resistant to high plant population density stress. Thus promotion of the hybrids that are tolerant to stress, will result in increased grain yield per unit area.
Knowledge of associations among the yield components, can improve selection e ciency (Raghu et al. 2011) based on indirect selection using a trait that is easy to select but highly correlated with grain yield. In this study, the selection e ciency for grain yield based on number of leaves above the cob and stem lodging could be high because of high heritability of these traits and their high correlation with grain yield. The use of indirect traits in selection has improved selection of grain yield under stress and non-stress conditions (Gasura et al. 2014). There is great potential of increasing the plant density and hence grain yield above the levels reported in this study based on the careful use indirect selection traits such as higher number of leaves above the cob and resistance to stem lodging.

Conclusion
The study has shown that it is possible to improve maize grain yield through increasing plant population density per unit area. Gains of at least 26% were observed by using tropical x temperate hybrids at high population density. The high yielding hybrids under high plant population density were associated reduced stem lodging and increases number of leaves above the cob. Thus future improvement of maize yield will primarily occur through tolerance to higher planting density by reducing stem lodging and increasing the number of leaves above the cob.

Declarations Acknowledgements
We are thankful to the National Research Foundation of South Africa for funding this work. We are also thankful to the University of KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa for the provision of the germplasm used in this study.

Funding details
The National Research Foundation of South Africa funded this work

Con icts of interest
There are no con icts of interest Availability of data and material Data and germplasm can be made available for research purposes.