{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.030275229357798167, 'fraction_numerical': 0.007339449541284404, 'mean_word_length': 5.2701149425287355, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
“What Bones And Bony Features Are You Teaching Your Students?” A Survey Of Skeletal System Coverage In Undergraduate Human Anatomy And Physiology Courses

Undergraduate (baccalaureate) human anatomy (HA) and anatomy and physiology (A&P) courses are offered globally, but how similar is their content coverage for each organ system? There has been a dearth of published research on this subject. Previously, some of the authors (Reynolds et al., 2018; submitted) surveyed instructors of stand‐alone HA as well as A&P courses to document comparability and variability in skeletal muscular system coverage in these courses. We now focus our attention on skeletal system coverage in these courses. A study by Sparacino et al., (2019) evaluated the undergraduate nursing anatomy curriculum at four institutions in the United Kingdom, but the study did not list the specific bone and its features students needed to know.Thus, a representative sample is required to be able to assess the variations in skeletal system coverage in both stand‐alone HA and A&P courses across different institutions.