{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.033942558746736295, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010443864229765013, 'mean_word_length': 4.408450704225352, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
FTC v. Intel: Applying the 'Consumer Choice' Framework to 'Pure' Section 5 Allegations

The Commission was wise to keep its options open by pleading both pure Section 5 violations and also violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act....If the Commission does find a pure Section 5 violation, however, it should only do so if it does this while utilizing the consumer choice framework.