{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03006012024048096, 'fraction_numerical': 0.003006012024048096, 'mean_word_length': 5.091463414634147, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Contribution of modern imaging in rectosigmoid neoplastic disease (comparison with fiberoptic endoscopy).

Double-contrast enema (DCE) remains the primary diagnostic exploration. Its specific method and interpretation require skillful handling. Unlike colonoscopy, DCE results in false-positives, the frequency of which varies widely in function of the skill of the interpretation. False negatives reach a significant level from a threshold of size which can be fixed at 5 mm. Despite these drawbacks, double-contrast enema, which is an exploration involving a two level of invasiveness and which provides a good panoramic image of the colon should remain the primary exploration in routine check-ups. DCE is an essential part of loco-regional evaluation. It is important in post-operative check-ups to screen for relapses. Post-operative follow-up should be systematic, involving an initial reference examination after 4 months, a check-up every 6 months for two years and then an annual check-up.