{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023006134969325152, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0049079754601227, 'mean_word_length': 5.369140625, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
427 Improving completion rates of electronic discharge summaries

Background Annual Trust data and previous audits in our department revealed a massive number of incomplete electronic discharge summaries (EDSs) over the last three years. This posed a great risk to patient safety as important information about the patients’ diagnosis, management and follow up arrangements are not shared with the GP, other healthcare professionals or the patients themselves when the EDS is not completed before discharge from hospital. Previous attempts to address this issue had been unsuccessful or temporarily effective. Objectives We aimed to improve EDS completion rates in our Department and sustain this improvement through time, thus achieving enhanced patient care and safety. Methods This is an ongoing project involving all inpatients discharged from the Paediatric ward of our District Hospital and all staff involved in their discharge process. Using the methodology of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), multiple, small sample, Plan- Do- Study- Act (PDSA) cycles were performed monthly from September 2020. Changes were introduced gradually, and their effect tested with each cycle, as described below: Cycle 1: Introduced ban on patients’ departure from the ward without a hard copy of the EDS, via asking the nursing team to no longer facilitate this, nor expect the EDS to be mailed to them. Cycle 2: Introduced the monthly EDS completion rates competition: each week’s and weekend’s ward leading Consultants were scored according to the EDS completion rates achieved during their week. Results were illustrated in a poster in the doctors’ office, emailed to the Consultants and shared in the Junior Doctors’ whatsapp group. The top performing leaders were commended on and rewarded with a chocolate prize. Cycle 3: Increased study sample (days audited). Learning points about possible alterations in everyday work that could enhance EDS completion, shared with the team. Cycle 4: Illustrated the month’s results in a themed, eye-catching poster and circulated to the team comparison between the first and this month, demonstrating great improvement. Cycle 5- currently ongoing: monthly audit of completed EDSs and information sharing with the team via means established during the previous cycles. Results Significant improvement in the EDS completion rates (from 73% on average for each Consultant team on their worst audited day, to 95%) was demonstrated throughout and has been so far sustained. Prolonged ward rounds and handovers, diminishing the time available to the team to complete EDSs, were identified as possible factors for poor performance. Ambulating patients and mental health patients were most frequently the ones discharged without an EDS. Involving the Consultant body and turning the project into a game/competition, while including both nurses and doctors, seemed to boost staff engagement in the process and minimise resistance to change. Conclusions Early team involvement, at all levels of seniority, can enhance the success of quality improvement projects addressing longstanding day-to-day clinical problems. Continuous positive reinforcement and information sharing lead to better results and sustained improvement.