{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018810371123538384, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006100660904931368, 'mean_word_length': 5.581939799331104, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Comparison of lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems versus fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis.

This study aimed to systematically compare the safety, effectiveness and radiological changes after lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems and fusion to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease . All studies that were performed to compare various lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems with any lumbar fusion to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease and were published until April 30, 2015 were acquired through a comprehensive search in various databases. A meta-analysis was performed after the methodological qualities of trials were assessed and after data were extracted. Sixteen trials with 881 patients with a short-term follow-up (within 2 years) and a middle-term follow-up (2 to 4 years) were identified. Patients treated with lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems experienced more significant advantages in terms of operation time, intra-operative blood loss, complications and adjacent segment degeneration/disease development than those treated with lumbar fusion. The two groups did not significantly differ in terms of improvement in Oswestry Disability Index, visual analogue scale scores, satisfaction rate of operation and range of motion of adjacent segments. Lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems is superior to lumbar fusion to some extent, although some of its advantages have yet to be verified and compared with those of lumbar fusion. However, the two interventions were not significantly different in terms of relief in symptoms, functional recovery and motion preservation. Thus, lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems is recommended for its safety. A prudent attitude is necessary to choose between these interventions on the basis of effectiveness and changes in adjacent segments before a large-scale and long-term follow-up study can be performed.