{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.013059701492537313, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.244186046511628, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Half Invention: The Inevitable Truth about the Invention Concept

It is common knowledge that it is politically controversial which subject-matter may be patentable: think of software and business methods. Much less known is that the current opaque system of assessment of patent applications is defective and violates statutory rules. Reflection on the purpose of patents explains which exclusions are inherent to the patent system and leads to an interpretation that follows the statute precisely, in contrast to current case law.