{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.0279027902790279, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016201620162016202, 'mean_word_length': 5.465116279069767, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Attention Deficit Disorder

(Blaskey et al., 1990; Scheiman, Blaskey, Ciner, et al., 1990; Scheiman, Blaskey, Gallaway, Ciner, & Parisi, 1990), along with that of Grisham (1990), has demonstrated that approximately 95 % of individuals who think they would benefit from Irlen filters have vision problems in these areas. Researchers and those evaluating individuals for Irlen filters should be aware that the vast majority of individuals who feel that they would benefit from Irlen filters actually have accommodative, binocular vision or ocular motility disorders as defined in our study. These people may require appropriate treatment for these vision problems before Irlen filters should be considered as a treatment option. Future research on the effectiveness of Irlen filters must take this information into consideration, and appropriate vision testing should be an integral part of any research design. In addition, Irlen screeners should begin to refer their patients to professionals that will do the type of assessment necessary to detect accommodative, binocular vision and ocular motility disorders.