{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02654867256637168, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0022123893805309734, 'mean_word_length': 5.4714285714285715, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Clinical skills still provoke debate

EDITOR,--J Goodwin's editorial on the importance of clinical skills fails to offer any worthwhile evidence for the hypotheses proposed.1 The author opines that only the “clinically inexperienced” depend on the Swan-Ganz catheter for measuring intracardiac pressures in critically ill patients, yet the author offers no evidence to support this “good example” of undue reliance on technology and ignores objective …