{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024429967426710098, 'fraction_numerical': 0.004885993485342019, 'mean_word_length': 5.758241758241758, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Accuracy of localisation and cause of preclinically suspected diagnoses. Explorative analysis of retrospective data of 700 patients

The preclinical acute patient management by non‐physicians (i.e. paramedics, EMTs, etc.) is known to have large‐scale differences in accuracy and specificity, depending on numerous variables, such as rural vs. metropolitan regions or international differences in education of paramedics. The primary aim of our study was to find out differences in accuracy of anatomic localization and etiologic cause of preclinically suspected diagnoses between traumatic and atraumatic patients.