{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024963289280469897, 'fraction_numerical': 0.03010279001468429, 'mean_word_length': 4.430278884462151, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
273 The Consequences of a Failed Screening Programme


 
 
 Controversy exists surrounding the efficacy of the UK screening programme for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
 
 
 
 Clinical records were reviewed in children who were treated surgically for DDH. Demographic data, age and mode of presentation, and surgical treatments were analysed, as well as outcomes, re-operation rate and AVN incidence. Late diagnosis was defined as greater than 4 months.
 
 
 
 106 children (16 male, 90 female) underwent surgery from 1997 to 2018. 95 hips were operated for dislocation and 22 were operated for dysplasia. 13 patients had bilateral dislocations. Of the dislocated hips, the median age at diagnosis was 9 months (IQR 2-19). 56% were diagnosed late. In the late diagnosis group the median age for diagnosis was 19 months (IQR 15-21). We have identified an increasing trend in late presentation in recent years. This has been matched with an increasing trend in operation rates for dislocation per 1000 births.
 
 
 
 This study demonstrates that DDH is being diagnosed increasingly late, which correlates with an increased need for surgical management. This suggests that the current UK screening programme is failing to identify children with DDH in a timely fashion, which necessitates more aggressive surgical treatment and less favourable outcomes.
