{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.039047619047619046, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01619047619047619, 'mean_word_length': 4.871508379888268, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Decision on the Prosecution Application under Article 58(7) of the StatuteIn the Case of The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Muhammad Harun (“Ahmad Harun”) and Ali Muhammad Al Abd-Al-Rahman (“Ali Kushayb”) ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I

The International Criminal Court ("ICC") took a significant step in its investigation of the situation in Darfur, Sudan, when, on April 27, 2007, Pre-Trial Chamber I (Judges Akua Kuenyehia (Presiding), Claude Jorda, and Sylvia Steiner) issued warrants of arrest for Ahmad Harun and Ali Kushayb for their alleged responsibility for 51 counts of crimes against humanity and war crimes under Article 25 of the Rome Statute of the ICC. Many in the world had waited four years, since early 2003 when the alleged Darfur atrocity crimes began, for the first credible attempt at accountability against the alleged perpetrators. Although not the first warrant of arrest by the ICC, this particular decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I ("PTC") launched the ICC into active cases on Darfur and it has a unique character in light of how it evolved.