{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018808777429467086, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.4124293785310735, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The Personal Responsibility Group

to belong to groups. In this article I argue that people do not have to subordinate themselves and that the group does not have to maintain control for each member to satisfy his or her personal goals. I offer a normative model-the personal responsibility group-in which individual preferences are put ahead of group preference and the group declines all control. I attempt to show how this can lead to positive outcomes for participants. I set forth two concepts to implement these views. First, when a group has tasks to perform, each person is free to choose the one(s) he or she will do, if any. Second, the choices and actions of each person are based on what each person regards as best. Ideally, the members are aware of the preferences of others and of the overall goals and interdependencies that link them, but are not bound by them. The group gives up control over the individual and the individual gives up the