{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.023917259211376857, 'fraction_numerical': 0.001292824822236587, 'mean_word_length': 6.588235294117647, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Attention‐dependent switching between intrinsic‐muscle and extrinsic‐visual coordinates during bimanual movements

Inter‐limb coordination is achieved through multiple levels of motor control based on intrinsic‐muscle and extrinsic‐visual coordinates. Online visual feedback affects which of these coordinates is dominant, and visual perception is involved in the switching of motor coordination across the two hands; however, it remains unclear whether there is any role for attention in inter‐limb coordination. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of attention on the dominance of intrinsic‐muscle and extrinsic‐visual coordinates by investigating inter‐limb interference in the right or left hand during bimanual reaching movements, as induced by visual perturbations. We first showed an effect of differences in online visual feedback on bimanual coordination (Experiment 1). We then revealed that attention to visual cursors that directly affected the hand movement led to the dominance of the intrinsic‐muscle coordinates, which synchronized homologous muscle activities. In contrast, attention to an integrated visual object controlled by bilateral hand movements was associated with a preference for extrinsic‐visual coordinates to synchronize bilateral movement directions (Experiment 2). Thus, attention‐dependent switching between intrinsic‐muscle and extrinsic‐visual coordinates was observed during bimanual movements; extrinsic‐visual coordinates may enable goal‐directed bimanual movements at least for particular task requirements.