{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.021839080459770115, 'fraction_numerical': 0.011494252873563218, 'mean_word_length': 5.090909090909091, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
[Quality of the information obtained by a questionnaire survey in studying the epidemiology of malignant neoplasms].

The quality of the data collected in a retrospective cohort breast cancer study in Estonia was evaluated. Two separate approaches were used to investigate possible biases in the study. Firstly, a similar questionnaire was mailed to a sample of 86 women twice during an interval of one week to six months. Overall questionnaire reliability was 83.4%. Secondly, comparisons of the data obtained by postal questionnaires about past history of lung tuberculosis with hospital medical record information revealed that 2.5% of women with severe forms of the disease and 30.3% with milder forms (controls) had denied their previous disease. These findings show that more attention must be paid to the quality control procedures in cancer epidemiology studies.