{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03066944266495836, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0257847533632287, 'mean_word_length': 5.4743390357698285, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 1, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
No evidence for a role of competitive capabilities of adults in causing habitat segregation of diploid and hexaploid Senecio carniolicus (Asteracaeae)

Hexaploid individuals of Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae) predominantly occur in dense swards while diploids prevail in open vegetation. We test whether this habitat segregation is due to differential responses to competition. Linear regression models were used to relate biomass and maximum leaf length of adults to vegetation cover within radii of 20 cm around target individuals. Biomass differed between ploidy levels, but was independent from vegetation cover in both cytotypes. Maximum leaf length of diploids increased with vegetation cover, but remained constant in hexaploids. This suggests that at the adult stage diploids respond to increasing competition by changes in plant architecture rather than changes in resource utilization, while hexaploids are unaffected by competition. Consequently, other factors, such as competitive interactions at earlier life stages, likely are responsible for habitat segregation of diploid and hexaploid S. carniolicus.


Introduction
Polyploidisation plays an important role in the diversification of angiosperms (Hegarty and Hiscock 2008;Soltis et al. 2009) with both the allo- (Soltis and Soltis 2009) and the autopolyploid (Parisod et al. 2010) pathway being evolutionary successful. In species with more than one ploidy level, individuals of different ploidy level are often found in the same area forming contact zones (Duchoslav et al. 2010;Hülber et al. 2009;Husband and Schemske 2000;Stahlberg 2009;Trávnícek et al. 2011). Generally, such contact zones arise from secondary contact of once allopatric cytotypes (Petit et al. 1999). Growing attention is paid to various preand postzygotic reproductive isolation mechanisms responsible for maintaining cytotype coexistence (Husband and Sabara 2004;Orr and Presgraves 2000), because these may contribute to the formation of new species (Soltis et al. 2009).
In the absence of geographic isolation, an important mode of prezygotic reproductive isolation is ecological (habitat) segregation (Rieseberg and Willis 2007), which has been recognized in several cytologically complex groups including Centaurea jacea (Hardy et al. 2000), Mercurialis annua (Buggs and Pannell 2007), Senecio carniolicus (Hülber et al. 2009) and Achillea borealis (Ramsey 2011). There is some evidence that adaptation to novel habitats is not only due to post-polyploidization processes such as genomic evolution or reinforcement, but may already be conferred by genome multiplication per se (Ramsey 2011). Little is known, however, about the mechanisms underlying this ecological differentiation. One potential factor is competitive ability. In polyploids, it might be increased (Maceira et al. 1993) compared with their diploid relatives due to bigger cells, higher biomass and overall higher vigor as well as broader ecological ranges of polyploids (Lumaret et al. 1987;Otto 2007;Petit and Thompson 1997), allowing polyploids to occur in denser vegetation (Hülber et al. 2009;Stahlberg 2009). However, in arctic or alpine environments the effects of ploidy level on competitive abilities have rarely been investigated (Brochman and Elven 1992) and hence are still insufficiently understood.
A good model organism for studying causes of habitat segregation among ploidy levels is Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae). It is a herbaceous perennial endemic to the Eastern Alps and the Carpathians, where it commonly occurs in grasslands, dwarf shrub communities, rock crevices, fellfields and stable screes over siliceous bedrock from the treeline up to 3,300 m a.s.l. (Reisigl and Pitschmann 1958). Within the Eastern Alps, S. carniolicus comprises three main cytotypes (2x, 4x, 6x; Suda et al. 2007;Sonnleitner et al. 2010). The most frequent cytotypes are diploids and hexaploids and they frequently co-occur in mixed populations within narrow contact zones (Sonnleitner et al. 2010;Suda et al. 2007). Previous studies found cytotypes of S. carniolicus segregating along an ecological gradient with diploids occurring mainly in open vegetation on rocky micro-sites, whilst the hexaploids were more abundant on sites with high vegetation cover (Hülber et al. 2009;Schönswetter et al. 2007;Sonnleitner et al. 2010). As underlying causes, different competitive abilities of cytotypes have been hypothesized (Sonnleitner et al. 2010): due to lower vigor and resulting lower competitiveness diploids would be forced into more open habitats.
Ecological segregation of morphologically differentiated cytotypes is commonly observed within polyploid complexes. However, the interpretation of higher competitive abilities of polyploids causing this segregation has rarely been investigated explicitly and evidence for alpine species is totally lacking. Thus, in the present study we examine whether the observed ecological segregation of diploid and hexaploid S. carniolicus is a result of different competitiveness. Specifically, we relate performance traits of adult plants (biomass, maximum leaf length) to vegetation cover expecting a stronger decrease in biomass and leaf length of diploids compared with that of hexploids with increasing cover.

Field work and plant material
Di-and hexaploid individuals of S. carniolicus were randomly collected at the south-eastern slope of Mt Hoher Sadnig (Fig. 1), mountain range of Goldberggruppe, Carinthia, Austria. The collection site was located within a contact zone subject of previous studies (Hülber et al. 2009;Schönswetter et al. 2007). It is situated within the alpine vegetation belt, which is dominated by Carex curvula grasslands and dwarf shrub communities intermixed with local open habitats (wind-exposed ridges, rocky outcrops). In total, 210 adult non flowering plants (106 diploids, 104 hexaploids) were investigated. Cytotype assignment was based on morphological characters, with hexaploids having less hairy, larger and more shallowly lobed leaves than diploids (Flatscher 2010). Only unambiguously identifiable individuals were selected. Within a radius representing the maximum horizontal spread of neighboring plants (i.e. of 20 cm) around each focal individual of S. carniolicus, total cover of living and, if still fixed in the substrate, dead vascular plants, used as a proxy for competition, was visually estimated in terms of percentage coverage to the next 5%. Bryophytes and lichens were not considered due to their low competitive ability (Löbel et al. 2006). Only sites with vegetation cover ranging from 20 to 80%, that is, the range where both cytotypes were known to occur with reasonable frequencies (Hülber et al. 2009), were chosen.
Plants were collected and the following two easily assessable traits were measured: aboveground biomass, which is known to be an important response to competition (Choler et al. 2001;Chu et al. 2008;Hülber et al. 2011;Onipchenko et al. 2009), was determined at a measuring accuracy of 1 mg after air drying at 35°C for several days.  challenging quantification of belowground biomass was not undertaken. Additionally, maximum leaf length as a proxy for competition for light (Weiner 1990) was recorded in the field.

Statistical analysis
Biomass and leaf length were first log-transformed to approximate normality. Relationships between life traits and vegetation cover were assessed via linear regression models with single performance traits as response. Cytotype, vegetation cover scaled to zero mean and unit variance as well as their interaction were used as predictor terms. Analyses were conducted using R (R Development Core Team 2008).

Results and discussion
Diploid individuals of S. carniolicus were significantly smaller (lower biomass and shorter leaves) than polyploids (Table 1; Fig. 2), a commonly observed pattern in plants (Otto 2007). In both cytotypes, biomass was independent from neighborhood density (Table 1; Fig. 2). This disagrees with expectations because biomass has been identified as an important trait sensitive to competition also in alpine habitats (Choler et al. 2001;Hülber et al. 2011;Onipchenko et al. 2009). However, a lack of consistent differences in competitive responses between diploids and polyploids has also been found in high alpine Ranunculus adoneus using reciprocal transplantation experiments (Baack and Stanton 2005) and in lowland Aster amellus based on common garden experiments (Münzbergova 2007). This suggests that the current distribution patterns of diploid and polyploid S. carniolicus are governed by other factors. These may include ecological differentiation in allopatry (Münzbergova 2007), rhizosphere interactions (Lamb et al. 2007) or seed limitation in diploids under high competitive pressure due to higher investment into growth rather than reproduction (Keddy 2007). Further data will be necessary to test these hypotheses.
Competition seems, however, to have a significant influence on plant architecture of diploid individuals, because the maximum leaf length increased with higher vegetation cover (Fig. 2). In contrast, leaf length of hexaploid individuals did not depend on vegetation cover. Longer leaves are assumed to be an adaptation to competition for light because in denser vegetation taller plants get a disproportionately higher share of light compared with their smaller neighbors (Weiner 1990). Thus, diploid S. carniolicus appears to respond to increased light competition by changed resource allocation, resulting in longer leaves, rather than reduced resource utilization. Even if only of minor relevance for adult individuals (but see Dullinger and Hülber (2011) for counter-examples from other alpine plants), competition may well have substantial impacts on the recruitment of species. Germination, seedling growth and survival of alpine plants strongly depend on both vegetation density and snowmelt schedule . In S. carniolicus, seedlings of hexaploids are bigger than those of diploids (Weis 2010) and likely have higher competitive abilities in dense vegetation due to enhanced light supply. In contrast, mechanical damages in open habitats due to wind-driven snow might be more pronounced in the bigger seedlings of polyploids. Contrary to Taraxacum venustum (Hoya et al. 2007), time to germination was shorter in diploids than in hexaploid S. carniolicus (Weis 2010) facilitating quick establishment in open habitats with low competitive pressure. Such differences in seedling establishment between cytotypes could further explain their different distribution patterns reported previously (Hülber et al. 2009).
One possible reason why biomass showed no response to competition might be increased facilitation on micro-sites with higher vegetation cover. Apart from increased competition for resources, denser vegetation may also confer facilitative effects via, for instance, higher ambient temperatures (Körner 2003) avoiding frost damages (Inouye 2008(Inouye , 2000, shelter against wind (Carlsson and Callaghan 1991), reduced soil movements (Körner 2003) and diminished herbivory pressure (Schöb et al. 2010). Facilitation is of special importance in stressful alpine environments, where positive interactions of plants have been found to increase with stress (Bertness and Callaway 1994;Callaway et al. 2002;Choler et al. 2001). Consequently, the effects of competition and facilitation might counterbalance each other (Klanderud 2010;Schöb et al. 2010) resulting in a net effect of no response in biomass. Further studies, such as removal experiments, will be necessary to assess the strength of competition and facilitation in the studied vegetation zones.
In conclusion, our results provide no evidence that aboveground competition at the adult stage contributes to the observed habitat segregation between diploid and hexaploid individuals of S. carniolicus. However, we suppose that a combination of abiotic stressors associated with early snowmelt and effects of the changing neighborhood density influencing the reproduction (seed yield and recruitment) rather than the vegetative growth might be responsible for differences in the distribution of diploid and hexploid S. carniolicus. Therefore, further studies such as removal experiments or reciprocal transplantations including seeds and seedlings are necessary to identify the underlying causalities of the observed ecological segregation within the polyploid-complex of S. carniolicus.