{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03686635944700461, 'fraction_numerical': 0.043010752688172046, 'mean_word_length': 4.873873873873874, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A commentary on the mathematical model of the heterogeneous gypsy moth larva population by G. Dwyer and his co-authors

In this commentary I utilize the general methods of the mathematical theory of heterogeneous populations in order to point out an omission in the analysis of the mathematical model in [Dwyer et al (2000), Am Nat, 156(2):105–120], which led to the conclusion in [Elderd et al (2008) Am Nat, 172(6):829–842] that the original model must be replaced with an alternative one because of the new data. I show that more thorough understanding of the underlying model allows twitching the model parameters to account for the observed data.