{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02406015037593985, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 4.946428571428571, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
New developments in 'any willing provider' laws.

As the debate over healthcare reform continues, the controversy concerning "any willing provider" laws also continues. "Any willing provider" laws require a healthcare insurer (or managed care organization) to establish criteria that a provider must meet in order to participate as a network provider. Such laws prohibit an insurer from denying any provider willing to meet those criteria from participating as a network provider. Proponents of any willing provider laws cite the recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court not to review a lower court ruling finding in favor of a hospital as validation of such laws.