{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.036181678214010776, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006928406466512702, 'mean_word_length': 5.132075471698113, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
On differences between hydrogen bonding and improper blue-shifting hydrogen bonding.

Twenty two hydrogen-bonded and improper blue-shifting hydrogen-bonded complexes were studied by means of the HF, MP2 and B3LYP methods using the 6-31G(d,p) and 6--311 ++G(d,p) basis sets. In contrast to the standard H bonding, the origin of the improper blue-shifting H bonding is still not fully understood. Contrary to a frequently presented idea, the electric field of the proton acceptor cannot solely explain the different behavior of the H-bonded and improper blue-shifting H-bonded complexes. Compression of the hydrogen bond due to different attractive forces-dispersion or electrostatics--makes an important contribution as well. The symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) has been utilized to decompose the total interaction energy into physically meaningful contributions. In the red-shifting complexes, the induction energy is mostly larger than the dispersion energy while, in the case of blue-shifting complexes, the situation is opposite. Dispersion as an attractive force increases the blue shift in the blue-shifting complexes as it compresses the H bond and, therefore, it increases the Pauli repulsion. On the other hand, dispersion in the red-shifting complexes increases their red shift.