{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01443001443001443, 'fraction_numerical': 0.005772005772005772, 'mean_word_length': 4.931623931623932, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Quality of life considerations.

The public has expressed various concerns about possible effects of remedial activities on the quality of life of people residing near the river or using the river in the vicinity of the remediation activities. The USEPA responded to these concerns in the RS (TAMS Consultants, Inc. January 2002). As a means of ensuring that such concerns are addressed and potential impacts are minimized to the extent practicable, the USEPA decided to develop quality of life performance standards. The standards were developed early on to ensure that the public had an opportunity to provide comments and to ensure that the standards are considered in designing the remedy.