{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.018504240555127217, 'fraction_numerical': 0.01233616037008481, 'mean_word_length': 4.926940639269406, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Acoustic recognition of voice disorders: a comparative study of running speech versus sustained vowels.

The signals of running speech and sustained vowels of normals and subjects suffering from dysphonia were analyzed statistically with respect to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The distribution of the SNR measured in multiple overlapping frames in the speech signal was described by a linear combination of the distribution frequencies for SNR = 0 dB, 0 dB less than SNR less than 15 dB, and SNR greater than or equal to 15 dB. The values of the linear combination, the SNR of the vowels, and clinical assignment of the voices to normal and pathologic populations based on laryngoscopic and stroboscopic investigation parameters were used to compare the different evaluations of the voices. The SNR distribution in speech remained stable over signal lengths of more than 30 s. The correlation coefficient between the SNR measure for running speech and the SNR of sustained vowels amounted to only 0.63. The error rate in the discrimination between normal and dysphonic voices amounted to 22.6% in application to sustained vowels and 5.6% when the SNR distribution was used. Possible reasons for the observed discrepancies are discussed, and the results are compared to those of other studies.