{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.02619047619047619, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0, 'mean_word_length': 5.74331550802139, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Transbronchial biopsy vs. bronchoalveolar lavage in interstitial lung disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are heterogeneous disorders characterized by varying degrees of inflammation and fibrosis in the lung parenchyma. The use of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cellular analysis and transbronchial biopsy with forceps (TBLB) in ILD is often a matter of debate. ILDs have been a diagnostic challenge and require multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) to develop a consensus diagnosis based on clinical, radiologic, laboratory, BAL cellular analysis, and histologic information.


RECENT FINDINGS
The BAL cellular analysis is a commonly performed tool, and some ILDs have distinctive cellular findings. Its use alone is seldom diagnostic and almost always requires clinical, radiologic findings, and or histologic information interpretation. The minimally invasive procedures, such as TBLB, transbronchial cryo-biopsy (TBCB), and invasive procedures, such as surgical lung biopsy (SLB) help obtain a histologic diagnosis.


SUMMARY
This review serves as a resource to assist clinicians to develop effective communication and close collaboration through MDD for accurate selection of diagnostic tools to reach the correct and final diagnosis.