{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027918781725888325, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021996615905245348, 'mean_word_length': 5.226315789473684, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Failure to suspect and diagnose thalassemic syndromes. Interpretation of RBC indices by the nonhematologist.

A three-year review of the medical records of 76 patients with apparent thalassemic syndromes (mean corpuscular volume, greater than 75 cu micron; RBC count, greater than 5 X 10(6)/cu mm) was performed to assess overall physician response to this information at a midwestern teaching institution. Abnormal indices were recognized in only 50% of the cases; in only 32% of cases was a thalassemic syndrome considered in the differential diagnosis. Residents in internal medicine failed to recognize microcytic indices and to consider thalassemic syndromes 42% and 59% of the time, respectively. Even though hemoglobin electrophoresis was performed in 25 patients, in only 15 (56%) of the 25 cases was beta-thalassemia proved or alpha-thalassemia presumptively diagnosed. In 17% of all cases, the patients were treated with iron without diagnostic findings on iron studies and/or in spite of data suggesting a thalassemic syndrome. The RBC indices are an underused portion of the complete blood cell count, and readily apparent thalassemic syndromes are often not considered.