{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024311183144246355, 'fraction_numerical': 0.006482982171799027, 'mean_word_length': 5.3061224489795915, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Diderot and the Actor's Machine

On the notorious question of sensibility—whether or not an actor should really “feel” the emotion he expresses—Denis Diderot brought off the best known volte-face in the history of acting theory. An erstwhile champion of inspiration and emotionality in theatrical performance, he came to believe, by the time he wrote the Paradoxe sur le comédien (1773), that an actor should not attempt to experience inwardly the passions he enacts onstage. Considerable speculation and controversy have attended Diderot's late substitution of head for heart as the mainspring of theatrical emotion.