{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.024551463644948063, 'fraction_numerical': 0.021718602455146365, 'mean_word_length': 5.0227272727272725, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A study of the effect of introducing a restrictive cervical screening policy on laboratory workload and cervical cancer detection rates

This study examines the effect of a change in screening policy on the detection rate of severe dyskaryosis. During 1987 a total of 423 cases of severe dyskaryosis were identified by the Avon Screening Programme. Eleven per cent of these abnormal smears were repeat smears taken without clinical indication within the recommended 5 year recall period (interval smears). In a comparable control group of negative smears 31% were interval smears. Twenty‐five per cent of the dyskaryotic interval smears (3% of the total severely dyskaryotic smears) were taken within 3 years of the previous negative smear, compared with 50% of the control group. By discouraging opportunistic smears within 5 years of the previous smear, the laboratory workload could be reduced by 30%, or within 3 years of the previous smear by 15%. There is, however, a risk of 11% and 3% respectively of missing a significant lesion (severe dyskaryosis).