{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.015613382899628252, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002973977695167286, 'mean_word_length': 5.598039215686274, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Environmental conditions and performance outcomes: a preliminary report of implications for patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND
Whereas a host of studies have established various forms of experimental bias, few clinical investigations have examined the relationship of the behavior of the observer or examiner to a subject's physical performance.


OBJECTIVE
To measure the grip strength of volunteers in 2 distinct clinical "environments."


METHODOLOGY
Twenty subjects were randomized in a crossover design to undergo grip strength testing in positive and negative environments as created by the distinctly different behavioral/communication approaches of the research staff. Each subject underwent 4 consecutive trials in both settings.


RESULTS
A paired t- test was conducted to determine if the contrasting environments impacted the volunteer's performance. Eight of the 10 subjects demonstrated a significantly stronger grip in the positive environment. One subject's grip remained essentially unchanged and one subject provided a slightly higher performance in the negative setting.


CONCLUSIONS
The study suggests that clinical environmental conditions influence the physical performance of a grip strength maneuver. Thus, it seems probable that clinical or experimental settings may affect diagnostic test results and/or functional outcome.