{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.016409266409266408, 'fraction_numerical': 0.002413127413127413, 'mean_word_length': 5.687096774193549, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Review: Taxonomy of Nitella (Charales, Charophyceae) based on comparative morphology of oospores and multiple DNA marker phylogeny using cultured material

The genus Nitella is the largest group in the Charales and has the highest diversity of vegetative and oospore morphologies. In his worldwide monograph on the Charales, R. D. Wood characterized the sections and species of Nitella mainly on the basis of vegetative morphology and treated oospore wall morphology as diagnostic at the infraspecific level. Therefore, many species of Nitella exhibiting distinct external morphology of the oospore wall (EMOW) were reduced to infraspecific rank and only 53 of 204 species previously described were recognized within Nitella. However, recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies have demonstrated the phylogenetic validity of using EMOW for diagnosing some species of Nitella. More recently, a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) study of internal morphology of the oospore wall (IMOW) and multiple DNA marker analyses using both nuclear and chloroplast gene sequences were conducted to improve our understanding of the taxonomy of Nitella at the species level, on the basis of cultured material of a large number of species. Multiple DNA marker analyses resolved detailed and robust phylogenetic relationships within the genus and demonstrated the taxonomic and phylogenetic significance of IMOW. In addition, they supported the taxonomic decisions based on differences in oospore morphology, suggesting that an integrated approach, involving both SEM studies of the EMOW and IMOW and multiple DNA marker analyses, is appropriate to address problems at lower taxonomic levels within the genus, as well as to construct a natural taxonomic system for the genus. In this paper, recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies are reviewed and recent improvements in taxonomy of Nitella are summarized. Moreover, the evolution of morphological features and phylogenetic relationships within Nitella are discussed, focusing especially on oospore morphology.