{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03231292517006803, 'fraction_numerical': 0.034013605442176874, 'mean_word_length': 5.472527472527473, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Survival outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for low‐risk, early‐stage cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Recent studies have focused on oncologic outcomes and associated morbidities of various surgical techniques. One study highlighted that simple hysterectomy rates for women with early-stage cervical cancer have increased from 44.6% in 2004 to 52.7% in 2014 without significant impact on five-year overall survival (97.6% after simple hysterectomy vs 95.1% after radical hysterectomy).