{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.05686032138442522, 'fraction_numerical': 0.06180469715698393, 'mean_word_length': 4.436241610738255, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 2, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
EP16.27: Is sonographic stomach position in congenital diaphragmatic hernia reproducible for clinical use?

Results • Overall inter-observer agreement was moderate and statistically significant for both methods by Cordier et al (k=0.60, SE 0.07, 95% CI 0.47-0.73 P <.0001) and Basta et al (k=0.60, SE 0.06, 95% CI 0.47-0.73, P <.0001). • The lowest reproducibility was with grade 3 (moderate agreement) for the method by Cordier et al and grade 4 (fair agreement) for method by Basta et al Conclusion • Our study showed a fair to moderate interoperator agreement of the stomach position grading systems proposed by Cordier et al and Basta et al after standardization of the methods at our centre. Further multi-centre studies are necessary to confirm our results. Grade Cordier et al (2015) Basta et al (2016)