{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.029766693483507644, 'fraction_numerical': 0.02091713596138375, 'mean_word_length': 5.5473684210526315, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Magnetic Phase Formation in Self-Assembled Epitaxial BiFeO3-MgO and BiFeO3-MgAl2O4 Nanocomposite Films Grown by Combinatorial Pulsed Laser Deposition.

Self-assembled epitaxial BiFeO3-MgO and BiFeO3-MgAl2O4 nanocomposite thin films were grown on SrTiO3 substrates by pulsed laser deposition. A two-phase columnar structure was observed for BiFeO3-MgO codeposition within a small window of growth parameters, in which the pillars consisted of a magnetic spinel phase (Mg,Fe)3O4 within a BiFeO3 matrix, similar to the growth of BiFeO3-MgFe2O4 nanocomposites reported elsewhere. Further, growth of a nanocomposite with BiFeO3-(CoFe2O4/MgO/MgFe2O4), in which the minority phase was grown from three different targets, gave spinel pillars with a uniform (Mg,Fe,Co)3O4 composition due to interdiffusion during growth, with a bifurcated shape from the merger of neighboring pillars. BiFeO3-MgAl2O4 did not form a well-defined vertical nanocomposite in spite of having lower lattice mismatch, but instead formed a two-phase film with in which the spinel phase contained Fe. These results illustrate the redistribution of Fe between the oxide phases during oxide codeposition to form a ferrimagnetic phase from antiferromagnetic or nonmagnetic targets.