{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.04913793103448276, 'fraction_numerical': 0.0353448275862069, 'mean_word_length': 4.608695652173913, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 3, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
The vascular laboratory in practice: a national survey in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES
to overview Dutch vascular laboratory practice and specifically the variation in duplex criteria.


METHODS
a questionnaire was sent to all vascular laboratories in The Netherlands (n=140).


RESULTS
the response rate of the inquiry was 64% (n=89). There is no consensus on interpretation of outcome. In 22% of the clinics (n=20) a diagnostic angiography will be omitted when a percutaneous angioplasty is advised on account of duplex ultrasound. Only 5% (n=4) relies upon duplex ultrasound for operation without diagnostic angiography. In 44% (n=39) a PSV (peak systolic velocity) of 125 cm/s is used to identify a>70% or internal carotid artery stenosis. In 44% (n=39) a PSV of 210 cm/s and 10% (n=9) a PSV > or =150 cm/s is used. For grading a relevant stenosis in the femoro-politeal arteries a PSV ratio > or =2.5 is chosen in 75% (n=67). Criteria used for graft surveillance shows also a wide variation.


CONCLUSIONS
a commission for the accreditation of vascular laboratories should be established with the goal of creating standards and performing quality control.