{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.01693404634581105, 'fraction_numerical': 0.016042780748663103, 'mean_word_length': 5.380681818181818, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Comparison of Ipsilateral Pedicled TRAM Flap With and Without Previous Irradiation

Due to concerns for increased complications, there is reluctance to use the ipsilateral pedicled TRAM for breast reconstruction in the presence of previous chest wall irradiation. This study will assess whether the ipsilateral pedicled TRAM is a safe and effective option when the pedicle is part of the irradiation field. Consecutive cases of ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flap procedures from 1997–2003 were reviewed. Patients with and without previous irradiation were compared on several vascular indicators. There were 123 and 124 patients in the irradiated and nonirradiated groups, respectively. These groups were demographically similar, except the nonirradiated group was significantly older. The irradiated group had a significantly higher rate of minor wound problems related to mastectomy flap healing (8.9% versus 1.6%). All other flap vascular complications were equivalent. The ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flap is a safe and effective option for breast reconstruction in an irradiated field in terms of the pedicle to the flap.