{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.03669222343921139, 'fraction_numerical': 0.028169496166484117, 'mean_word_length': 4.823599760813235, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 51, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 2, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
Knockdown of Tet2 Inhibits the Myogenic Differentiation of Chicken Myoblasts Induced by Ascorbic Acid

Ascorbic acid (also called Vitamin C, VC) strengthens the function of Tets families and directly increases DNA demethylation level to affect myogenic differentiation. However, the precise regulatory mechanism of DNA methylation in chicken myogenesis remains unclear. Results of present study showed that the mRNA expression of MyoD significantly decreased and MyoG and MyHC increased in myoblasts treated with 5 μM 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) and 5 μM VC (p < 0.05). Results also indicated the formation of myotubes was induced by 5-AZA or VC, but this effect was attenuated after knockdown of Tet2. In addition, the protein expression of TET2, DESMIN and MyHC was remarkable increased by the addition of 5-AZA or VC, and the upregulation was inhibited after knockdown of Tet2 (p < 0.05). DNA dot blot and immunofluorescence staining results suggested that the level of 5hmC was significantly increased when treated with 5-AZA or VC, even by Tet2 knockdown (p < 0.05). Moreover, 5-AZA and VC reduced the level of dimethylation of lysine 9 (H3K9me2) and trimethylation of lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27me3), and this inhibitory effect was eliminated after Tet2 knockdown (p < 0.05). These data indicated that Tet2 knockdown antagonized the increased levels of 5hmC and H3K27me3 induced by 5-AZA and VC, and eventually reduced myotube formation by modulating the expression of genes involved in myogenic differentiation. This study provides insights that epigenetic regulators play essential roles in mediating the myogenic program of chicken myoblasts.


Introduction
Recently, many studies revealed that DNA methylation and histone modification exert essential roles in regulating myogenic differentiation [1,2]. It was reported that the whole genomic DNA methylation decreased during myoblast differentiation [3]. Epigenetic studies increase the knowledge of the molecular mechanism regulating myogenic relatedgene expression and myogenesis program [4,5]. Fundamental studies are still required to understand the details of epigenetic regulation in chicken myogenesis.
Myoblasts are myogenic precursor cells that play an important role during skeletal muscle development. The fate of myoblasts is determined by transcription factors including Pax3/Pax7 and the myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs), which work together to establish the epigenetic state in the processes of myofiber formation [6,7]. A series of studies has shown that DNA demethylation exerted a critical role in myogenesis [2,8,9]. The expression of TET1 and TET2 are significantly increased and the DNA methylation level decreases after induction of myoblast differentiation [10]. The Tet1/Tet2 knockout myoblasts showed muscle atrophy and attenuated MyoD expression and myotube formation in mice. Interestingly, knockdown of Tet2 in C2C12 led to increased DNA methylation of gene promoters of MRFs, which correlated with decreased expression of these genes and abrogated myogenic differentiation [10]. Our previous study also indicated that Tet2 affected chicken myoblast differentiation by regulating DNA methylation and histone methylations [8]. 2 of 11 Previous study showed that the demethylation of MyoD and MyoG promoter was required for myoblast differentiation [11,12]. MyoG push the differentiation program forward, accompany with epigenetic regulation leading to MRFs expression and myotube fusion. It was reported that the differentiation capacity of C2C12 was reduced by treatment of sodium arsenic, as a result of the increased DNA methylation and decreased expression of MyoG [13]. However, hypermethylation of MyoG decreased sharply after the induction of differentiation in C2C12 [14]. In addition, a decrease of DNA methylation of MyoD promoter occurred during myoblast differentiation [7,15]. Taken together, these findings showed that transcription factors act though epigenetic regulation to genes are required to ensure myogenetic differentiation.
Several molecules have been identified to facilitate myoblast differentiation during the past studies [16][17][18]. Although its mechanism has not been completely revealed, VC was considered to promote myoblast differentiation probably due to mediate DNA demethylation [16]. Studies have also shown that 5-AZA promoted myogenic differentiation by inhibiting DNA methylation and increasing DNA demethylation [18]. Treatment of mouse myoblasts with 5-AZA affected the expression of cell cycle-related genes and myogenic genes to regulate early differentiation [18]. A previous study showed that VC enhanced the activity of Tets enzyme and rapidly increased the level of 5hmC. This effect was inhibited in Tet1 and Tet2 knockout mice, indicating that VC exerted its function by mediating the Tets family [19]. Recent studies found that VC strengthens the function of Tets family and directly increased the level of DNA demethylation to promote myogenic differentiation in mice [10]. A recent study revealed that trimethylation of lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and H3K27me3 are accompanied by chromatin compaction, which is required for myoblast differentiation [8,20]. The demethylation of H3K27me3 was mediated by demethylase KDM6a that opened the chromatin to permit MyoG expression and start to differentiation [21,22]. VC deficiency has been reported to decrease the expression of histone demethylases KDM6b, leading to rapid accumulation of H3K27me3 in cells [9]. Therefore, 5-AZA and VC affected the demethylation of DNA and histone to promote myoblast differentiation. This accumulating evidence corroborated the findings that VC and 5-AZA regulated DNA methylation level and induced myoblast differentiation.
Currently, few data are available about DNA methylation status of epigenetic regulation, so the precise epigenetic mechanisms regulating myogenesis in chickens still needs to be further studied. To address this issue, the present study aimed to explore the relationship with VC and Tet2 in regulation of myogenic differentiation by using a chicken myoblast cell model. Tet2 knockdown myoblasts were treated with 5-AZA and VC to investigate their inductive effects on myoblast differentiation. Thus, this study will provide valuable information on exploration of the epigenetic mechanism of myogenesis.

Effect of 5-AZA and VC on Myogenic Related Gene Expression
In order to determine the effect of decreased Tet2 expression on myoblast differentiation induced by 5-AZA and VC, the optimal concentrations in the regulation of myoblast differentiation were firstly examined. Myoblast differentiation was induced when the density of myoblasts reached 90%. Different concentrations of 5-AZA and VC were added to the differentiation medium, and the change of myogenic factors level was detected after 3 days. Results suggested that 5 and 50 µM 5-AZA remarkably reduced the mRNA expression of MyoD and increased the expression of MyoG and MyHC (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). The expression of MyoD was significantly decreased at 5 µM VC (p < 0.05) and extremely significantly decreased at 50 µM VC (p < 0.01) ( Figure 1). However, the expression of MyoG and MyHC was significantly increased after the treatment with 5 µM and 50 µM VC (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). There was no difference in the expression of MyoD and MyoG when the supplemental concentration of was 0.5 µM 5-AZA and 0.5 µM VC (p > 0.05). Therefore, 5 µM 5-AZA and 5 µM VC were selected as the optimal concentrations in the following experiments. expression of MyoG and MyHC was significantly increased after the treatment with μM and 50 μM VC (p < 0.05) (Figure 1). There was no difference in the expression of M oD and MyoG when the supplemental concentration of was 0.5 μM 5-AZA and 0.5 μ VC (p > 0.05). Therefore, 5 μM 5-AZA and 5 μM VC were selected as the optimal conce trations in the following experiments. Figure 1. The mRNA expression of myoblast differentiation related genes was analyzed by qR PCR. Myoblasts were treated with 5-AZA (0, 0.5, 5 and 50 μM) and VC (0, 0.5, 5, and 50 μM), th the expression of myogenic genes was measured after 3 days. Data are presented as the mean SEM. p < 0.05 is shown as *; p < 0.01 is shown as **.

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on Myoblast Differentiation after Tet2 Knockdown
5-AZA and VC induced myoblast differentiation after Tet2 knockdown was dete ed. Results showed that the fusion ability of myotubes was enhanced significantly myoblasts treated with 5-AZA-and VC compared with control, but the formation myotubes was diminished after Tet2 knockdown ( Figure 2). The protein level of TET2 myoblasts rose rapidly after treatment with 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.01) ( Figure 3). It w obviously reduced in the Tet2 knockdown group, but up-regulated in addition of 5-AZ and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3). Addition of 5-AZA and VC also significantly increased t protein level of DESMIN and MyHC when compared with the control group (p < 0. (Figure 3). Moreover, the up-regulation level of DESMIN by 5-AZA was stronger th that of VC. The level of DESMIN was remarkably decreased after Tet2 knockdown, a this decrease was recovered in addition of 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3). The le of MyHC was significantly decreased after Tet2 knockdown, but it quickly returned the similar lever of control by addition of 5-AZA or VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3).  Myoblasts were treated with 5-AZA (0, 0.5, 5 and 50 µM) and VC (0, 0.5, 5, and 50 µM), then the expression of myogenic genes was measured after 3 days. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. p < 0.05 is shown as *; p < 0.01 is shown as **.

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on Myoblast Differentiation after Tet2 Knockdown
5-AZA and VC induced myoblast differentiation after Tet2 knockdown was detected. Results showed that the fusion ability of myotubes was enhanced significantly in myoblasts treated with 5-AZA-and VC compared with control, but the formation of myotubes was diminished after Tet2 knockdown ( Figure 2). The protein level of TET2 in myoblasts rose rapidly after treatment with 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.01) ( Figure 3). It was obviously reduced in the Tet2 knockdown group, but up-regulated in addition of 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3). Addition of 5-AZA and VC also significantly increased the protein level of DESMIN and MyHC when compared with the control group (p < 0.01) ( Figure 3). Moreover, the up-regulation level of DESMIN by 5-AZA was stronger than that of VC. The level of DESMIN was remarkably decreased after Tet2 knockdown, and this decrease was recovered in addition of 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3). The level of MyHC was significantly decreased after Tet2 knockdown, but it quickly returned to the similar lever of control by addition of 5-AZA or VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3).

Figure 1.
The mRNA expression of myoblast differentiation related ge PCR. Myoblasts were treated with 5-AZA (0, 0.5, 5 and 50 μM) and VC the expression of myogenic genes was measured after 3 days. Data ar SEM. p < 0.05 is shown as *; p < 0.01 is shown as **.

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on Myoblast Differentiation after Tet2 K
5-AZA and VC induced myoblast differentiation after Tet2 ed. Results showed that the fusion ability of myotubes was e myoblasts treated with 5-AZA-and VC compared with contr myotubes was diminished after Tet2 knockdown ( Figure 2). The myoblasts rose rapidly after treatment with 5-AZA and VC (p obviously reduced in the Tet2 knockdown group, but up-regula and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 3). Addition of 5-AZA and VC also si protein level of DESMIN and MyHC when compared with the ( Figure 3). Moreover, the up-regulation level of DESMIN by 5that of VC. The level of DESMIN was remarkably decreased aft this decrease was recovered in addition of 5-AZA and VC (p < 0 of MyHC was significantly decreased after Tet2 knockdown, b the similar lever of control by addition of 5-AZA or VC (p < 0.05)

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on 5hmC level after Tet2 knockdown
Our previous study demonstrated that Tet2 knockdown led to a general decrease in 5hmC level and promoted the differentiation of myoblasts. In order to determine whether Tet2 is required for 5-AZA and VC induced myoblast differentiation, the profile of DNA methylation in Tet2 knockdown myoblasts treated with/without of 5-AZA and VC were analyzed. Interestingly, result of a DNA dot blot showed that both 5-AZA and VC significantly increased the level of 5hmC (p < 0.01) ( Figure 4A,B), which suggested that they have similar effects on DNA demethylation. Moreover, it was confirmed by the result of immunofluorescence staining that 5-AZA and VC increased the level of 5hmC compared with the control group (p < 0.05) ( Figure 4C,D). However, after knockdown of Tet2, the level of 5hmC sharply diminished, although addition of 5-AZA and VC restored its level to some extent (p < 0.05) (Figure 4). These results indicated that 5-AZA and VC promoted the increase of genomic 5hmC level, but this promotion was inhibited after knockdown of Tet2.

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on 5hmC Level after Tet2 Knockdown
Our previous study demonstrated that Tet2 knockdown led to a general decrease in 5hmC level and promoted the differentiation of myoblasts. In order to determine whether Tet2 is required for 5-AZA and VC induced myoblast differentiation, the profile of DNA methylation in Tet2 knockdown myoblasts treated with/without of 5-AZA and VC were analyzed. Interestingly, result of a DNA dot blot showed that both 5-AZA and VC significantly increased the level of 5hmC (p < 0.01) ( Figure 4A,B), which suggested that they have similar effects on DNA demethylation. Moreover, it was confirmed by the result of immunofluorescence staining that 5-AZA and VC increased the level of 5hmC compared with the control group (p < 0.05) ( Figure 4C,D). However, after knockdown of Tet2, the level of 5hmC sharply diminished, although addition of 5-AZA and VC restored its level to some extent (p < 0.05) (Figure 4). These results indicated that 5-AZA and VC promoted the increase of genomic 5hmC level, but this promotion was inhibited after knockdown of Tet2.  The gray analysis of relative protein expression. Data are presented as the means ± SEM. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on 5hmC level after Tet2 knockdown
Our previous study demonstrated that Tet2 knockdown led to a general decrease in 5hmC level and promoted the differentiation of myoblasts. In order to determine whether Tet2 is required for 5-AZA and VC induced myoblast differentiation, the profile of DNA methylation in Tet2 knockdown myoblasts treated with/without of 5-AZA and VC were analyzed. Interestingly, result of a DNA dot blot showed that both 5-AZA and VC significantly increased the level of 5hmC (p < 0.01) ( Figure 4A,B), which suggested that they have similar effects on DNA demethylation. Moreover, it was confirmed by the result of immunofluorescence staining that 5-AZA and VC increased the level of 5hmC compared with the control group (p < 0.05) ( Figure 4C,D). However, after knockdown of Tet2, the level of 5hmC sharply diminished, although addition of 5-AZA and VC restored its level to some extent (p < 0.05) (Figure 4). These results indicated that 5-AZA and VC promoted the increase of genomic 5hmC level, but this promotion was inhibited after knockdown of Tet2.

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 Level after Tet2 Knockdown
Our previous study showed that the expression of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 decreased rapidly after myoblast differentiation, and increased significantly after knockdown of Tet2. To investigate the effect of 5-AZA and VC on the level of H3K9me2 and

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 Level after Tet2 Knockdown
Our previous study showed that the expression of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 decreased rapidly after myoblast differentiation, and increased significantly after knockdown of Tet2.
To investigate the effect of 5-AZA and VC on the level of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3, their levels were detected by immunofluorescence staining. Result suggested that the level of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 were significantly decreased after the addition of 5-AZA and VC compared with control (p < 0.05). However, the levels increased rapidly after Tet2 knockdown, and significantly decreased after 5-AZA and VC treatment (p < 0.05) ( Figure 5). These results indicated that 5-AZA and VC significantly reduced H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 level, and this inhibition was relieved after Tet2 knockdown. H3K27me3, their levels were detected by immunofluorescence staining. Result suggested that the level of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 were significantly decreased after the addition of 5-AZA and VC compared with control (p < 0.05). However, the levels increased rapidly after Tet2 knockdown, and significantly decreased after 5-AZA and VC treatment (p < 0.05) ( Figure 5). These results indicated that 5-AZA and VC significantly reduced H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 level, and this inhibition was relieved after Tet2 knockdown.

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on Histone Methyltransferases Expression after Tet2 Knockdown
To investigate the regulation mechanism of Tet2 in the level of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3, the mRNA expression of histone methyltransferases and demethyltransferases was measured by qRT-PCR. Result showed that the mRNA expression of histone methyltransferases (Setdb1 and Ezh2) decreased remarkably by treatment of 5-AZA and VC and increased by knockdown of Tet2 (p < 0.05) ( Figure 6). However, Tet2 knockdown induced upregulation was blocked when addition of 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 6). However, the expression level of histone demethyltransferases (Kdm1a and Kdm6a) was significantly increased when treated with 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 6). By contrast, their expression was obviously decreased after Tet2 knockdown and recovered by addition of 5-AZA and VC compared to the control group (p < 0.05) ( Figure 6).

Effects of 5-AZA and VC on Histone Methyltransferases Expression after Tet2 Knockdown
To investigate the regulation mechanism of Tet2 in the level of H3K9me2 and H3K27me3, the mRNA expression of histone methyltransferases and demethyltransferases was measured by qRT-PCR. Result showed that the mRNA expression of histone methyltransferases (Setdb1 and Ezh2) decreased remarkably by treatment of 5-AZA and VC and increased by knockdown of Tet2 (p < 0.05) ( Figure 6). However, Tet2 knockdown induced upregulation was blocked when addition of 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 6). However, the expression level of histone demethyltransferases (Kdm1a and Kdm6a) was significantly increased when treated with 5-AZA and VC (p < 0.05) ( Figure 6). By contrast, their expression was obviously decreased after Tet2 knockdown and recovered by addition of 5-AZA and VC compared to the control group (p < 0.05) (Figure 6).

Discussion
DNA methylation of specific genes is required for m It was reported that DNA methylation modification wa modification during myogenic differentiation. They func nance of myogenic-related gene silencing by DNA meth epigenetic regulators during myogenic differentiation is cidating the relationship between VC and myoblast diffe to understand the regulatory mechanism of myogenesis. sights into mechanisms by which VC contributes to m nome-wide DNA methylation levels were measured af chicken myoblasts cell model.
Studies showed that the addition of VC into C2C12 Mrf4 and promoted myoblast differentiation and the for tubes [25]. This study found that the mRNA levels of My

Discussion
DNA methylation of specific genes is required for myogenic differentiation [21,23]. It was reported that DNA methylation modification was also associated with histone modification during myogenic differentiation. They functioned to allowing the maintenance of myogenic-related gene silencing by DNA methylation [24]. The precise role of epigenetic regulators during myogenic differentiation is still not fully understood. Elucidating the relationship between VC and myoblast differentiation would be important to understand the regulatory mechanism of myogenesis. In the present study, to gain insights into mechanisms by which VC contributes to myoblast differentiation, the genome-wide DNA methylation levels were measured after Tet2 knockdown by using chicken myoblasts cell model.
Studies showed that the addition of VC into C2C12 up-regulated the expression of Mrf4 and promoted myoblast differentiation and the formation of multinucleated myotubes [25]. This study found that the mRNA levels of MyoG and MyHC were significantly increased when addition of 5 µM 5-AZA and 5 µM VC. Subsequent results showed that 5-AZA and VC up-regulated the protein level of TET2, MyHC and DESMIN, but the promotion effects were inhibited after Tet2 knockdown. Combined with the results of previous studies, we speculated that 5-AZA and VC up-regulated the expression of Tet2 and 5hmC level to promoted myogenic differentiation.
Epigenetic regulation including DNA methylation and histone modification has been widely studied in muscle development. A series of studies emphasized that the epigenetic states are in dynamic change during the process of myogenesis [3,4]. The decline of Tet2 has been reported to change the status of DNA mythelation and down-regulate myogenic gene expression [8,10]. As demethylation is potently induced in actively differentiating my-oblasts, a high level of 5hmC in genomic DNA was observed. Some studies have revealed that VC regulates histone demethylation and modulates related gene expression [26]. This study presented that VC induced genomic DNA demethylation and reduced H3K27me3 level to promote myogenic differentiation by targeting Tet2. The decline of DNA methylation and H3K27me3 induced by VC was increased after Tet2 knockdown, which proved that knockdown Tet2 antagonizes VC. Furthermore, Tet2 knockdown-induced upregulation of histone methyltransferases was attenuated by addition of 5-AZA and VC. The expression levels of histone demethyltransferases was obviously decreased after Tet2 knockdown and recovered by addition of 5-AZA and VC. Therefore, our results using primary-cultured chicken myoblats showed myoblast differentiation was enhanced by addition of VC, while this promotion effect was functionally deteriorated by knockdown of Tet2.
An analogous function of VC with 5-AZA has been observed during myoblast differentiation. As a DNA demethylation reagent, the role of 5-AZA in DNA demethylation has been intensively studied. Previous study found that 5-AZA regulated the cell cycle and MRFs synthesis, and the cell cycle arrest related genes were down-regulated and MyHC expression was down-regulated in the 5-AZA group during differentiation [18]. Studies have found that 5-AZA treatment in Hela cells effectively silenced Dnmt1 transcription and improved the expression of Tet2 and 5hmC level [27]. The decrease expression of Tet2 and Tet3 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells was accompanied by the decrease level of 5hmC, and they were up-regulated in the addition of 5-AZA [28]. These results suggested that 5-AZA played roles in various cell types by promoting the expression of Tets family and up-regulating the level of 5hmC. In the present study, exposure of 5-AZA increased TET2 protein expression, leading to change the genomic methylation state of myoblasts. In addition, VC improved the oxidation of 5mC mediated by Tets family and promoted DNA demethylation in mammals [19]. For example, VC promoted the activity of Tets in ESCs, leading to a rapid increase of 5hmC [19]. Previous studies have found that VC promoted the differentiation of skeletal muscle cells to form myotubes in mice and human, and subsequent studies have found that VC promoted the differentiation of satellite cells [16,25]. To investigate how VC interplays with Tet2, the function of VC in Tet2 knockdown myoblasts was tested in this study. It was found that VC could partially rescue the inhibition of myoblast differentiation in Tet2 knockdown cells, as a result of increasing myotube formation. Moreover, our result demonstrated that the 5hmC level in Tet2 knockdown cells was dramatically increased by VC compared to no VC group, even higher than that in NC group. These results suggested that VC relieved the effect of Tet2 knockdown on reducing the generation of 5hmC, which due to VC enhanced the residual TET2 protein activity caused by incomplete siTtet2.
Collectively, the above results indicated that 5-AZA and VC upregulated expression levels of TET2 and MyHC, and knockdown of Tet2 attenuated the up-regulation of MRFs induced by 5-AZA and VC. 5-AZA and VC exerted remarkable effects on the promotion of DNA demethylation and histone demethylation, but their function was inhibited after Tet2 knockdown. This evidence suggested that 5-AZA and VC promoted DNA and histone demethylation by regulating Tet2 expression to achieve myoblast differentiation (Figure 7). Understanding these facts shed insights on the importance of the epigenetic regulation in myogenic program.

Myoblast Cell Culture
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Comm Nanjing Agricultural University. Primary myoblast cells were isolated from em 9-day chicken skeletal muscle according to a previous study [17]. Myoblasts we tained and cultured in growth medium (GM) consisting of DMEM, 10% FBS, an ture of 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS). When the cell confluence reached to 9 ture medium was replaced with differentiation medium (DM) consisting of DM horse serum (HS, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1% PS. After induction for 3 da were harvested for further analysis.

The RNA Interference Assays
For RNA interference assays, myoblasts were transfected with Tet2 siRNA tive control siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsb USA) according to the manufacturer's protocal as a previous study [17]. The tra myoblasts were induced differentiation in addition of 5-AZA and VC.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis
After culture, total RNA of myoblasts was isolated using Trizol reagent (Inv Carlsbad, CA, USA) and was reverse transcribed using PrimeScript RT Mas (Takara, Dalian, China). Then, qRT-PCR analysis was performed using SYBR ExTaq II (Takara, Dalian, China) with Step-One Real-Time PCR System (Applied

Myoblast Cell Culture
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University. Primary myoblast cells were isolated from embryonic 9-day chicken skeletal muscle according to a previous study [17]. Myoblasts were maintained and cultured in growth medium (GM) consisting of DMEM, 10% FBS, and a mixture of 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS). When the cell confluence reached to 90%, culture medium was replaced with differentiation medium (DM) consisting of DMEM, 2% horse serum (HS, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 1% PS. After induction for 3 days, cells were harvested for further analysis.

The RNA Interference Assays
For RNA interference assays, myoblasts were transfected with Tet2 siRNA or negative control siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocal as a previous study [17]. The transfected myoblasts were induced differentiation in addition of 5-AZA and VC.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis
After culture, total RNA of myoblasts was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and was reverse transcribed using PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Takara, Dalian, China). Then, qRT-PCR analysis was performed using SYBR Premix ExTaq II (Takara, Dalian, China) with Step-One Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). A totol 20 µL reaction mixture contained 2 µL cDNA, 0.5 µL of each primer, 10 µL 2× SYBR Green SuperReal PreMix (ABM Inc., Richmond, BC, Canada), 9 of 11 and 7 µL RNase-free H 2 O. PCR amplification was performed as follows: 94 • C for 30 s, followed by 39 cycles at 94 • C for 15 s, 58-62 • C for 30 s. The amount of each transcript was normalized to that of Gapdh gene. Results are presented as fold-change using the ∆∆ Ct method. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1.

DNA Extraction and Dot Blot Assay
DNA was isolated from cultured myoblasts using a MiniBEST Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Serially diluted 2-fold genomic DNA (300, 150, 75 ng) was spotted onto a nylon membrane (Biosharp, Shanghai, China), following by air-dried and UV-cross linked for 15 min, respectively. After being blocked in 5% skim milk in PBS with 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h at RT, membranes were incubated with anti-5hmC antibody (1:500; Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA) overnight at 4°C. The signal of dots was developed using an ECL reagent (Bio-Rad, Shanghai, China) after incubiation in HRPconjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:5000; Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA). The signal intensities of dot blot were anylazed by ImageJ 1.8 software.

Statistical Analysis
Each experiment was replicated three times. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests using SPSS 18.0. All data were presented as the means ± SE. Differences at p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.