{'fraction_non_alphanumeric': 0.027649769585253458, 'fraction_numerical': 0.010138248847926268, 'mean_word_length': 5.170454545454546, 'pattern_counts': {'":': 0, '<': 0, '<?xml version=': 0, '>': 0, 'https://': 0, 'lorem ipsum': 0, 'www.': 0, 'xml': 0}, 'pii_count': 0, 'substrings_counts': 0, 'word_list_counts': {'cursed_substrings.json': 0, 'profanity_word_list.json': 0, 'sexual_word_list.json': 0, 'zh_pornsignals.json': 0}}
A Royalist Rewriting of George Herbert: "His Majesties Complaint to His Subjects" (1647)

Robert H. Ray's detailed Herbert Allusion Book confirms F. E. Hutchinson's claim of "abundant evidence of The Temple being read throughout the seventeenth century by men of widely different churchmanship and political attachments.' Nevertheless, as Ray points out in a later essay interpreting some of his findings, a large proportion of allusions to Herbert-as many as 70 percent in the texts he cataloged-come from writers who can be safely identified as "loyal Anglicans and Royalists."2 While this estimate should not lead anyone to minimize Herbert's influence on political and religious radicals and nonconformists, it can spur us to examine in greater detail the uses made of Herbert in midand late century Royalist panegyrics and apologetics. An anonymous poem not noted by Ray, His Majesties Complaint to his Subjects. Occasioned by his late sujfferings, and A not right understanding between him and his Parliament (1647), provides an excellent opportunity to study how Herbert's verse