129 votes

★Drudge: Time to Take Down Santorum's Disguise

SOURCE-- Red State: "What A Big Government Conservative Looks Like"
**Links with actual bills and dates**


NOTE: I'm not going to personally attack Rick Santorum or his wife who opted to sue her chiropractor for $500,000. Complaint http://tinyurl.com/74qvxss
At the time Senator Santorum was stumping against his opponent for a $250,000 cap on medical malpractice suits.
It's no secret Santorum is a serial hypocrite.

"Do as I say, not as I did"

But Santorum's voting record is overwhelmingly inconsistent with the campaign propaganda that comes out of his mouth.
Santorum is not remotely a conservative or a defender of freedom.
He is a big government, "Show-me-the-money" LOBBYIST. Period. End of story.
Santorum is also the "Lobbyists' Best Friend".
He was rated #1 in Lobbyist Cash for 2006
Open Secrets: http://tinyurl.com/73e6r3s
★BREAKING: Rick Santorum Tax Returns Reveal K Street Pimp - Insider trading
Biggest compensation came health care industry and pushing for legislation that favored companies he held stock in.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum released four years of federal income tax returns on Wednesday night..."

**Links with actual bills and dates**


Defense and Foreign Policy

Voted for the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).
Voted for the START II Treaty
Voted to allow the sale of supercomputers to China.
Voted to ban antipersonnel landmines
Voted against requiring Congressional authorization for military action in Bosnia.
Voted to give $25 million in foreign aid to North Korea
Voted against the Conventional Trident Missile Program


Voted for Richard Paez to the 9th Curcuit (cloture)
Voted for Sonia Sotomayor, Circuit Judge
Voted for Richard Holbrooke to be Ambassador to the UN
Voted for Margaret Morrow to be District Judge
Voted twice for Marsha Berzon to the 9thg Circuit
Voted for Mary McLaughlin to be District Judge
Voted for Tim Dyk to be District Judge
Voted for James Brady to be District Judge


Voted against National Right to Work Act
Voted against Real of Davis-Bacon Prevailing union wages
Voted for Alexis Herman to be Secretary of Labor
Voted for mandatory Federal child care funding
Voted for Trade Adjustment Assistance.
Voted for Job Corps funding
Voted twice in support of Fedex Unionization
Voted to require a union representative on an IRS oversight board.
Voted to exempt IRS union representative from criminal ethics laws.
Voted against creating independent Board of Governors to investigate IRS abuses.


Voted for anti-gun juvenile justice bill.


Voted for funding for the legal services corporation.
Voted twice for a Congressional payraise.
Voted to mandate discounted broadcast times for politicians.


Voted against increasing the number of immigration investigators
Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens.


Voted against a flat tax.
Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for Medicare prescription drugs
Voted twice for internet taxes.
Voted against repealing the Clinton 4.3 cent gas tax increase.


Voted against food stamp reform
Voted against Medicaid reform
Voted against TANF reform
Voted for $2 billion for low income heating assistance.


Sponsored An amendment to increase Amtrak funds by $550 million
Voted to increase spending on social programs by $7 billion
Voted to increase NIH funding by $1.6 billion.
Voted to increase NIHnding by $700 million
Voted for a $1 billion bailout for the steel industry
Voted to allow OPIC to increase its administrative costs by 50%
Voted against transferring $20 million from Americorps to veterans.
Voted for the $140 billion asbestos compensation bill.
Voted to increase community development programs by $2 billion.

Spending and Entitlements

Voted to make Medicare part B premium subsidies an new entitlement.
Voted to give $18 billion to the IMF.

Health Care

**Santorum's top two campaign contributors: Blue Cross Blue Shield & High Mark. I couldn't make this up.

Voted twice for Federal mental health parity mandates in health insurance.


Voted to increase Federal funding for teacher testing



Voted for taxpayer funding of the National Endowment for the Arts.


This partial list does not even include his support for No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, (Bigger than Obama care) http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepapers/?subsec=137&id=902 FIVE debt ceiling increases, funding the bridge to nowhere, refusing to redirect earmark allocations to disaster relief along the Gulf Coast post Katrina, etc

Club for Growth today rendered an opinion on U.S. Rep. Ron Paul’s charge that Rick Santorum is a “big government, big spending individual.”

Verdict: Mostly true.

From Club for Growth analysis:

During a particularly touchy exchange at the ABC News debate, Paul attacked Santorum for being a “big-government, big spending individual.” To back up this claim, Paul offered four substantive examples: that Santorum voted to raise the nation’s debt limit five times, that Santorum voted against “right to work” laws, that he voted for No Child Left Behind, and that he voted for the Medicare Prescription Drug benefit.
Research shows that all four substantive allegations against Santorum are true.

Rick Santorum: Top-tier on Most Corrupt Member of Congress list 2 years running

Patriot Act
Privacy is in 4th amendment, but Patriot Act is ok
SANTORUM: No, let's be clear. We're talking about the 10th Amendment and the right of states to act.
PAUL: I think the Fourth Amendment is very clear. It is explicit in our privacy. You can't go into anybody's house and look at what they have or their papers or any private things without a search warrant. This is why the Patriot Act is wrong, because you have a right of privacy by the Fourth Amendment.
SANTORUM: Congressman Paul is talking about privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment, in which I agree with him, I don't necessarily agree that the Patriot Act violates that. But I do agree that obviously we have a right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment.


Santorum: I was AGAINST bombing Iran, before I was for It! By the Way, I LOVE the Shah!

Comment viewing options


You forgot to mention how Sanitarium stated

'if the election is Obama vs Romney you should choose Obama'. Then a few days later when asked if he would except a VP slot on Romney's ticket, he said 'of course I would'. I listened to the radio-cons, and none of them brought up Santitarium's comment about Obama being a better leader than Romney, which shows they are complete frauds in their claims of reporting news of integrity. In my opinion the right wing radio-cons are a major reason our country is in demise. They are the venue to promote the left vs right false paradigm destractions, while the fascist government continues to collude with the Banksters, Wall Street, and Big Business in the destruction of our Republic and transform it into a Totalitarian Collectivist tyranny.

ery important information for PA supporters

Santorum does not have many supporters on the delegate ballots. If our delegates run as anti-party elite delegates, they can get santorum votes for RP delegates.



Somebody from the RP camp should probably have a discreet word with someone in the Santorum camp.
Look we are last we are no danger, if you do not have enough delegates in a district get your supporters to vote for these. You don't want Romney taking delegates.
And if those delegates are supposedly just general GOP delegates, so much the better.

Let's face it the organisation in the Santorum camp is so abysmal they won't arrange something like that themselves.


Here is some good research as well -

on each GOP Candidate (by Kelleigh Nelson).

Santorum: http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh144.htm
Gingrich: http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh121.htm
Romney: http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh123.htm


Ron Paul (who she plans to vote for - confirmed by personal e-mail; will write him in if necessary): http://www.newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh143.htm

Excerpt from Ron Paul article:



Ron Paul - The Revolution




Real Deal Right Here

Drudge is in Romney's pocket

Ron Paul's aim is to get to Tampa and to not be last in the 1st ballot.
If this is achieved the delegate strategy fully swings into play.
In order to achieve this we need to keep Romney's delegate count down.
And in order to achieve that we need Santorum and Gingrich to remain in the race, whether we like it or not.
Romney is spending his large sums of cash on attacking these two and not Ron Paul.

We should take every opportunity to disparage Romney.
We should leave the other two alone (for now).
Why do you think Drudge wrote this piece?



Why do you think this could ever be published on the Drudge Report?


Is America Suicidal?

The "Two Man Race"

Real Deal Right Here

Satantorum is going to try to

Satantorum is going to try to slander Ron Paul by associating him with Romney.

Keep hammering him with his own record on every blog and article comment section.

Real Deal Right Here

Rick Santorum is Unelectable

Submitted by Tom Mullen on Mon, 02/20/2012


Real Deal Right Here

Let the Holy wars begin.


Quotes from Santorum's speech.





Right out of Adolf's

Right out of Adolf's playbook!

Real Deal Right Here

I am so used to people calling Obama, Hitler

I never even made the connection. This guy is scary.

How about

☪The Ayatollah Santorum

Real Deal Right Here

Serious infowar weapons in this htread



Rick Santorum Tax Returns Reveal K Street Pimp - Insider trading


Santorum, 53, has sold himself in the Republican primaries as both a social conservative and a Washington outsider, stressing his family's coal-mining background and his appeal to religious and working-class voters. His personal finances tell a different story, detailing the trajectory of a politician who grew more prosperous in the Senate and became a millionaire afterward, at times capitalizing on his Beltway connections.

The former Pennsylvania senator's tax returns show that his annual income surged from nearly $660,000 in 2007 to $1.1 million in 2009 before slipping to $923,000 in 2010.


His federal income taxes rose from 2007, when he paid $167,000, to $310,000 in 2009, then dropped to $263,000 in 2010. Santorum paid a combined tax rate of 28 percent over the four years, putting him in a high tax bracket but not in the top 35 percent. Gingrich paid an estimated 31 percent, according to his federal returns, while Romney paid 14 percent because many of his earnings came from investments taxed at a lower capital gains rate. Both Romney and Gingrich recently disclosed income tax returns.

Santorum's 2010 tax returns show he made more than $550,000 in media and consulting fees — paid to him through a corporation he set up, Excelsior LLC. The previous year, Santorum made more than $820,000 in fees, also paid through the same firm.

Last year, Santorum disclosed investment and real estate assets totaling as much as $2.5 million. In his presidential financial disclosure spanning 18 months between 2010 and 2011, Santorum also listed $1.3 million in income as a consultant — much of it coming from media appearances and corporate work on behalf of health care, energy and social conservative interests.








The tax returns were first made available Wednesday night by Politico.

Real Deal Right Here

Religious Christian Conservative Republicans RCCR vs Nazis

I joined the libertarian party in 1978 in Denver, and so came to know Dave Nolan. I voted for RP in 1988. I attended BOTH Nevada state republican conventions in 2008. I have spent much time pondering the concepts of liberty, morality, and associated concepts and have begun to write on the subjects. If you do a search on the two words orwells boot, I will be at the top of every list that comes back under the name factotum666. You may think that orwell makes that search to specific
even though it gets over 3 millions hits. Very well, try tyranny and boot. I am not number 1, but am still on the first page. Now that you have some idea about who I am:

There are, of course, many ways of classifying people. I would like to address four questions to groups that can roughly be classified as belonging to one or more of the following groups, religious Christians, conservatives, and republicans. For ease of use, I will refer to these people as RCCR. Rick Santorum is an archetypal version of an RCCR.

1. Given that by every known measure of which I am aware, the organized Catholic Church does everything in its power, at all levels, 1.) To protect practicing pedophiles, and in fact to see that they have a study supply of new unwary victims. 2.) Has never, again to my awareness, voluntarily offered help or aid to victims, but rather 3.) Has, whenever possible attacked the victims and their families. 4.) Sheltered and helped to avoid legal sanctions every and all of its staff from the consequences of their criminal behavior (See Bernard Cardinal Law as a classic example) and finally 5.) Continues with an official policy that any such behavior is strictly and internal Church Matter, not to be brought to the attention of civil authorities, thereby maintaining as its official position that the church has a right to act as accessories after the fact in criminal matters.

Compare the behavior of the church in dealing with the pedophiles and child rapists in their midst to the effort that they have put into preventing people from getting access to birth control. And what does Jesus say about all this?
"While he never mentions a fetus or abortion, he does say this about actual living children:
"See that you do not despise one of these little ones, for I say to you, that their angels in heaven continually behold the face of My Father who is in heaven" (Matthew 18:10). Jesus tells us not to despise or look down upon the least powerful and significant (by human standards) of humans.

Given this, why exactly, would any rational person look to the church as any kind of Moral Authority? They are no different from the Mafia, with a code of silence, whose first and primary loyalty is to the "family", and any problems are dealt with within the "family."

Question 2. RCCR want an every growing government. They want a military that can invade any country at any time (The Chaney 1% rule), a government that reserves to itself the right to be involved in almost all important private family decisions including what you can eat, how you can medicate yourself, life and death decisions, major health decisions, the type of sex you can have and with whom you can have it. Of course this is all in the name of morality, family, the sanctity of life (except of the civilians in the countries that we are invading) The RCCR wants to use religion as a factor in who can be elected to office. Since many of them believe in the literal word of the bible they wish to kill gay men who practice their sexuality. Given their stated hostility to people like me, an unbeliever, akin to a pedophile, it is easy to see that like the Nazis there would be death camps, the difference being that instead of Gays and Jews being sent to those camps, it would be unbelievers accompanying the queers. Since Jews are now the favorite pets of the RCCR. Now, if some RCCR feels offended by my comparing them to the Nazis, then explain the invitation by CPAC to people like Peter Brimelow. Another difference is that the RCCR currently promotes private gun ownership. But other than promoting gun ownership, and prefering to put Queers into death camps rather than Jews, what other differences are there between Nazis and RCCR?

Question 3. Given that almost all of what the RCCR stands for can be shown to be directly against the teachings of Jesus, is is possible that the RCCR are actually agents of the anti-Christ as foretold by revelation? A Point by point demonstration of this would take up a lot more space. I have a friend who is a genuine follower of Jesus and very knowledgeable in the bible, relevant history, and context. Unlike me, a Darwinist, he is a young earther. He does agree with me on the first sentence in this paragraph

Question 4. The RCCR keeps making statements akin to America is number 1. By what measure? Yes we have by far the largest military, have invaded more countries, killed more civilians. We also have the largest economy. But we also have the most number of people in prison, and by far the most number in prison per capita. Among first world countries we have we spend way more on health care, with much poorer outcomes. Our population is also not as well educated or knowledgeable. We have way more homeless. We have a gini index which puts in line with China, Mexico and Venezuela among others. and is much greater than that of any other first world country. Now you may think that is wonderful, but may also explain why we have social problems more in line with Argentina and other second world countries since the GINI coefficient tracks well with measures of social disfunction. For example, even disallowing the homicide rate for blacks we have by the highest homicide rate of any first world nation. We also have far more child abuse So exactly how are we "Number 1"?

Feel free to ignore me as I am a Jewish agnostic who has never had sex with a child or sanctioned that behavior, or protected a person who has done that, or approved of that kind of behavior. I also live more closely to the words and teachings of Jesus than most Christians of whom I am aware, Especially those who are rich, powerful self righteous Christians who specialize in judging others and appear to be without sin, since they are so anxious to "cast the first stone" :-)

Livin' on a prison planet...

Livin' on a prison planet...

Real Deal Right Here

Any vote to increase the debt

Any vote to increase the debt ceiling is a favor to the Federal Reserve banking monopoly

Real Deal Right Here

Frothy also lied and pretended to be a veteran lol



This one screen shot captures

This one screen shot captures ALL of what Santorum's candidacy is about.

He is the IMPLIED conservative. Not based in any fact. Just IMPLIED.

Real Deal Right Here

Gained Weight?

I read the first URL listed where it is claimed Santorum's wife sued because she "gained weight." I didn't notice the weight gain mentioned, but if it was it was a minor part! I don't know how the case turned out, but it was pursued because of apparently very painful back pain problems after treatment, and alleged errors in treatment. Some points may perhaps be made against Santorum here, but to say it was over a weight gain appears deceitful if you read the link supplied with the article. I know it's hard to check everything out. I have been guilty of not checking carefully enough on matters that seem to support Dr. Paul. But errors of fact only come back to harm our cause.

Point --ouch!


I was going off of memory --something I read on one of those Santorum hater sites.

I should have just stuck to the cap limit issue.

Real Deal Right Here

The point still IS the cap limit

When it comes to limiting ("capping") tort case damages, Mr. Santorum - who's a lawyer, remember - proved to be very much a "here's for you but not for me" hypocrite.

"In this world of sin and sorrow there is always something to be thankful for. As for me, I rejoice that I am not a Republican." [H.L. Mencken]

I know they all watch Drudge Report

But do you know how we can invite Levin, Rushbo, Beck and Hannity to come and look into Santorum's record?

Real Deal Right Here

Nothing in his record will disappoint any of those neo-cons.

His record is why they support him.

My guess is that they already have...

looked into Santorum's record. But if Romney is indeed the GOP's 'Anointed One', they won't attempt to take-down Santorum unless he becomes a viable threat to their guy. But I think the front they put on to their loyal followers is the 'Anybody But Obama' mantra - unless that anybody is Ron paul, of course.

I think that's why all the Levin/Rush/Beck/Hannity-ites are embracing either Romney, Gingrich or Santorum so superficially and blindly: Because they've been brainwashed into believing that Obama is the apex of all political evil and that America will be just fine if we just get him out of the White House. None of the aforementioned GOP shills have done anything other than distract their attention from the insidious root problems that are the true source of our country's ills...

I'm not arguing your points...

I'm just questioning this: "I think that's why all the Levin/Rush/Beck/Hannity-ites are embracing either Romney, Gingrich or Santorum so superficially and blindly: Because they've been brainwashed".

I'm not sure that a lot of these people, and others, are brainwashed. I think there is a good chance that they have such a vested interest in the current system, mostly financially, that they believe they have too much to lose if they don't support the establishment, corrupt or not. Sometimes it's easier to say I'm voting for Santorum because I know he's God's choice than it is to say I'm voting for him because I own the same stocks and I know he's going to protect my wealth.

No, I see what you're saying...

You make a good point. But to clarify (if needed): By listing Levin/Rush/Beck/Hannity-ites, I mean primarily their followers/listeners, and not so much the personalities themselves. Nevertheless, I do agree that many of the average, everyday voters also have the vested interests in the status quo that you allude to...

I guess the question then becomes: Which of them are aware of their underlying allegiances, and which are oblivious to them?

And Mark Levin endorsed him!

And Mark Levin endorsed him!

malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium
