User Score

Mixed or average reviews- based on 48 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 48
  2. Negative: 18 out of 48

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Aug 23, 2010
    When I was growing up the first Cats and Dogs came out, however I'm now all grown up and have no feelings of love towards it, so when I had to take my cousin to see it, you could say I was horrified I liked the original in the first place. Where to start, the acting, CG and story are all inept. I will say Marmaduke looks worse but that's not a whole lot of praise. Overall I'd say if your child is around 5 s/he be entertained. But at around 7+ I'd recommend renting something Expand
  2. AlanG
    Jul 30, 2010
    A horrible piece of crap. It makes the first one look bad. It makes battlefield earth look bad.
  3. Aug 16, 2010
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. $85 Million Dollars was used to make this film. Where did the money go?!!?! Not in the story part of Cats and Dogs The Revenge of Kitty Galore. Seriously what company would wait for nine years to make a sequel to a film that didn't need one in the first place. I hated everything about this film. All it was was a rehash of the first films plot which involves a cat bent on taking over the world and some dogs trying to stop the mad feline. The only difference is that the dogs team up with the cats. This film made me laugh a few times, but not enough to recommend this movie. Plus the ending leaves opened for a sequel that will probably never see the light of day. Hopefully this is the final film in the Cats and Dogs Franchise. Expand
  4. MikeH.
    Jul 30, 2010
    Really, it's rated PG for "Animal Action"? It's as if their making up things to rate it PG for. PG is the New G.
  5. Oct 8, 2010
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A disappointment...

    A big waste of time.

    There was some jokes that were not funny at all like in one part you see the main villain from the first movie and he's in a hannibal lector costume i mean chidren don't know about that!

    It was good for the first 5 minutes then it got stupid and annoying.

    All in all it was pretty terrible.
  6. Sep 28, 2011
    This is not a good movie at all! I can't believe I even went to see it! The plot is so unoriginal. It reminds me of James Bond, or some other secret agent movie. The acting is pretty bad also. It sounds like nails screeching on a black board. To be fair here, this movie is meant for little kids, but I was fourteen when I saw this. I thought it would be good, but it was terrible! I don't even like dogs! Expand
  7. Nov 11, 2011
    CATS & DOGS: The Revenge of Kitty Galore is a bad and highly unfunny or entertaining kiddie film that doesn't pay respect to the decent original and looks more cheaper than the first.
  8. Jun 11, 2013
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. the first movie was funny and entertaining. This film was boring and bad. I saw it on 3d and the 3d sucked. I liked the scene with The silence of the cats. This one was good. All the other movie was flying cats and dogs talking Expand

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 22 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 4 out of 22
  2. Negative: 12 out of 22
  1. Reviewed by: Ian Nathan
  2. 30
    Mostly, though, "Kitty Galore" is a grind, as well as proof that "What up, dog?" isn't any funnier when a pigeon says it to a dog.
  3. Fails to deliver enough clever gags, emotional warmth, or eye-popping 3D to compete with recent family releases.