

hide menu

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
#56 - ost (01/06/2013) [-]
&gt;Stoner humor   
&gt;Picture depicts AR-15, derived from Stoner AR-10   
&gt;MFW i got the joke   
I need to get out more
>Stoner humor
>Picture depicts AR-15, derived from Stoner AR-10
>MFW i got the joke

I need to get out more
User avatar #55 - drfrizz ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
guns dont kill people... its the bullets
User avatar #73 to #55 - goodguygary (01/06/2013) [-]
what if someone bashes their skulls in with the butt of a rifle?
User avatar #80 to #73 - orangepikmin (01/06/2013) [-]
Blame the butt, not the gun.
User avatar #85 to #80 - goodguygary (01/06/2013) [-]
but the butt is part of the....HHHHRRRRRRRGGGG
#79 to #73 - autoxx ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
A hammer works better... time to ban hammers!

User avatar #81 to #79 - goodguygary (01/06/2013) [-]
ban hammer the ban hammer? ARE YOU NUTS MAN?
#83 to #81 - autoxx ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
Kind of an infinite loop scenario.
#53 - menispuncher (01/06/2013) [-]
Freakconomics - Swimming pools are more dangerous than guns
User avatar #40 - sironion (01/06/2013) [-]
This is the hundredth time this joke has been posted on FJ. Gun rights people, listen up. A gun's physical design is to kill people. That's what they're for. So when you say "LOL GUNS DONT KILL PEOPLE IDIOT XD" then you're not using them for their function.
#88 to #40 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
A lot of guns now were actually designed for competition and sport shooting. Like the stag arms model 3g ar15 for example.
User avatar #57 to #40 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
Knives were made in order to kill things.
We should ban knives.

Clubs were created to kill stuff.
We should ban baseball bats, meat tenderizers, hammers, mallets, etc.
User avatar #77 to #57 - goodguygary (01/06/2013) [-]
are we being sarcastic?
User avatar #82 to #77 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #84 to #82 - goodguygary (01/06/2013) [-]
okay, my internet sarcasm reader is in the shop, so i had to ask.
User avatar #86 to #84 - ishalltroll ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
He is right though.
User avatar #87 to #86 - goodguygary (01/06/2013) [-]
knives were made to cut through materials other than flesh too.

clubs were created to hit things with great force, like a nail or a ball, not just a human, or animal.
User avatar #102 to #87 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
But when they were FIRST created. Those were their uses
To stab and slash things to kill them and to hit stuff to either kill it or destroy it.
User avatar #95 to #87 - ishalltroll ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
These arguments can be used on anything.
Bows are pretty much the same as guns, and were created to kill things too, though they are specified as a sport tool and are equally as deadly as an AR-15 if in the right hands.
It would be the best for everybody to just stop giving a **** and leave everything as it is. Because the discussion is pretty much going nowhere afterall.
User avatar #100 to #95 - goodguygary (01/06/2013) [-]
where in the holy hell did bows come out of this, bows were created with the idea of sending a projectile downrange so it could pierce the target, being that it WAS created for killing things, but a baseball bat, or (non war)hammers were not,
#91 to #87 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
And some guns where made to shoot through paper targets and stuff for competition and sports shooting.
#49 to #40 - recoveryone (01/06/2013) [-]
Actually, they're designed to send a projectile toward a target at set velocity. If we really wanted guns designed to kill people, we would take hollow point rounds and put Cyanide in the tips covered with wax. That rifle, appears to be a hunting rifle, it has an extended barrel for increased accuracy, a lightweight synthetic stock, a bi-pod for increased stability, and a telescopic sight. All desirable traits when going out to get food much cheaper then at a grocery store.
User avatar #393 to #49 - sironion (01/06/2013) [-]
Grenades were designed to hurl shrapnel into the air. Tanks were designed to fire projectiles at targets while being mobile. Swords were made to cut things. Thanks Captain Obvious, you ignorant jackass.
#404 to #393 - recoveryone (01/06/2013) [-]
Anytime, and I see that you did not respond to 2nd or 3rd part of my statement, care for a response?
User avatar #431 to #404 - sironion (01/06/2013) [-]
This post is not referring to this man's rifle specifically, but rather gun rights in general. I apologize if your mind allowed that to escape you. Although that would explain the nature of your argument.
#656 to #431 - recoveryone (01/07/2013) [-]
I'm sorry, generally when someone comments on a post, they are referring to that post. Also, a gun's general design is not always to kill people, as stated before, it could be used for target shooting, or hunting.
User avatar #34 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
my neighbors don't like guns and don't want them in their house....so if they ever get robbed...im just going to sit back and enjoy the show. maybe wish the robber a good night on his way out.

You only hear about people getting murdered...you don't hear about the guy who pulls out his 45 on the robber and scares him off....which happened at a store down the road a few weeks ago. was barely on local news. guns are not bad.
#24 - moldybreadcrumb (01/06/2013) [-]
I thought it was gonna be another gun control post.
#23 - neverposting (01/06/2013) [-]
Yeah, this argument is retarded, 'Most of us would not hi-jack a plan and crash it in to a building, therefore it should be legal, don't let an incident like 9/11 take away from my freedom!!!!' just do us all a favour and get an argument that is not retarded, it would make for a nice change.
User avatar #25 to #23 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
hi-jacking a plane is your decision..its more like saying don't make planes illegal because sometimes they crash. i ******* hate the US government right now, they are trying to take away my ******* protection.

When your house gets robbed, you will only do one of two things....grab your gun...or pray to god someone with a gun shows up...and cops take 10 ******* minutes.
User avatar #20 - scorcho (01/06/2013) [-]
"heroin doesn't inject itself, so it should be legal." seriously some of you gun people are retarded to the point where you should not have access to sharp objects.
User avatar #884 to #20 - dankfrank (01/07/2013) [-]
I know FJ doesn't like opinions but i'm going to post mine.

If heroin was made legal, would you go out and buy some? Probably not.
The government should stay out of peoples habits.
Why should they tell me what I can and can't put in my body
User avatar #885 to #884 - scorcho (01/07/2013) [-]
doesn't apply if someone else puts something into your body, a bullet for example.
User avatar #886 to #885 - dankfrank (01/07/2013) [-]
True, but why would someone try injecting you with heroin?
User avatar #887 to #886 - scorcho (01/07/2013) [-]
not the point. all i was saying is that the argument "guns don't kill people" is completely flawed.
User avatar #878 to #20 - kookookachooforyou (01/07/2013) [-]
everyone has the right to pursue happiness as long as they dont subtract from anothers happiness. i believe it is ok to to do drugs if thats what you want to do. there isnt anything wrong with using the substance just misusing it. guns dont kill people. people kill people. drugs dont make you an addict. you let yourself become one. i have a good friend that works 14 hours a day to pay child support on two kids he only gets to see twice a year. hes an amazing person and he just happens to like doing heroin after work to help hm wind down. he isnt harming anyone but himself. he does everything he is supposed to do. he takes care of himself. thats why i say it isnt the drugs or the guns that are ******* our world up, its the individual that makes all the difference.

tl;dr heroin is still bad but i wont judge anyone.
User avatar #625 to #20 - JoshBauer (01/07/2013) [-]
Guns protect people. Heroin doesn't protect people.
User avatar #718 to #625 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
What a 'Murican thing to say...
User avatar #737 to #718 - JoshBauer (01/07/2013) [-]
What an arrogant Euro-trash thing to say.
User avatar #819 to #737 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
Look at my username. Do I sound European to you?
User avatar #831 to #819 - JoshBauer (01/07/2013) [-]
Oh sorry. Your name is so ridiculous that I figured you were just using it as a screen name.
User avatar #838 to #831 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
Nice, way to insult somebody's name who doesn't sound Western.

I'm guessing more than half of the world have "ridiculous names"

I'm honestly laughing at how your logic works
#638 to #625 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
guns don't protect people in the slightest, i never seen a gun jump infront of a bullet to save someones live
guns are built solely to kill, they don't save anyone
if my life gets threatened and i use a gun to defend myself it still means that I probably killed someone
i'm not saying that i wouldn't use one in a dire situation, but what if nobody would be able to have gotten a gun in the first place?
User avatar #736 to #638 - JoshBauer (01/07/2013) [-]
Guns do protect people, the exact same way pepper spray protects women. Should we outlaw pepper spray? I mean, if your idea of protection is a shield, then pepper spray should be outlawed because it's more of a weapon than a shield. Pepper spray isn't going to jump in front of a rapist.
#827 to #736 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
>Guns protect people

If there were no guns accessible to civilians to begin with, there won't be a problem with shootings in the first place.
User avatar #860 to #827 - fredthemilkman (01/07/2013) [-]
Good luck taking away guns from people. America is so full of guns anyway. Plus drug cartels from Mexico would just send in more. The only people who would have guns are the people who use them illegally.
User avatar #869 to #860 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
Oh I never said guncontrol in US would work. With people crying out "Right to bear arms" and the constitution, and the fact that it's scattered everywhere, it wouldn't work.

All I'm pointing out is the fallacy of the people who think guns are completely innocent in crimes.
User avatar #836 to #827 - JoshBauer (01/07/2013) [-]
...you realize most people who commit shooting sprees don't have their guns legally?
User avatar #839 to #836 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
>Columbine Shooting

>Virginia Tech

>Sandy Hook (It was his mother's, who acquired it legally)

User avatar #842 to #839 - JoshBauer (01/07/2013) [-]

>VA Tech = Unfortunate.

>Sandy Hook = HIS MOTHER'S.
User avatar #847 to #842 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
my mistake on Columbine

>Sandy Hook- his mother bought it legally. I'm guessing she bought it to protect herself. Ironic isn't it?
User avatar #849 to #847 - JoshBauer (01/07/2013) [-]
Very ironic.
#671 to #638 - onceapiece (01/07/2013) [-]
If nobody had gotten a gun, then they would've used knives. That's how that **** worked when guns weren't invented. besides, taking away guns now wouldn't get rid of all of the ones that were made, and some people would even be able to make more. In addition, once you outlaw guns, guess who owns all the guns when all is said and done? The criminals.
User avatar #533 to #20 - Gundown (01/07/2013) [-]

But just like guns, it all depends on the person. Heroin does nothing harmful to anybody just sitting in the needle untouched just like a bullet does nothing just sitting in the magazine not being fired. Heroin has zero good uses, while guns do, believe it or not. Besides, 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday. Don't let one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch.
#490 to #20 - gargman (01/06/2013) [-]
It just depends on your perspective of the situation
For example a wise man once said, "Saying that guns kill people is like saying pencils make spelling errors." Both are tools, used to aid men. They can be used for good, or they can be used for evil.

TL;DR: Dont be a little butthurt faggot and blindly insult people's intelligence just because they have a different opinion than you.
#400 to #20 - dcj has deleted their comment [-]
#412 to #400 - xnotcreative (01/06/2013) [-]
No dumbass, you're taking it too literally...
User avatar #382 to #20 - alexusapi (01/06/2013) [-]
Heroin should be legal... people that use drugs are not criminals, they are addicts that need health care, not prison time. main purpose of drugs is make a person feel happy, the main purpose of a gun is to kill.
User avatar #690 to #382 - aesguitar (01/07/2013) [-]
Not if that's not the reason you own the gun... Some people just like guns or like shooting targets.
User avatar #565 to #382 - admiralen ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
the part where you get incredibly addicted is the problem... people are willing to kill for heroin, if you legalize it you increase the people addicted and when they run out of money (since you would have to tax it to **** ) they will start doing stupid **** for their next fix
User avatar #439 to #382 - wooyoungkim (01/06/2013) [-]
his point is that heroin is that OP's logic shouldn't be applied to drugs, or much to ANYTHING because that's just ******* stupid.

"heroin doesn't inject itself, so there's nothing wrong with it"

is what scorcho is trying to call a stupid logic.

Which is true I must say.
User avatar #256 to #20 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
i bet your support making all tables round cause people might hurt themselves on the corners. stupid people are ruining this country.

you might think im retarded for owning a gun, but damn it i bet i have a better chance then you when **** goes down.

When someone breaks in your house....you do 1 of two things....grab your gun...or pray to god someone with a gun shows up. and then you get brutally raped for the next 10 minutes while the cops are on the way
User avatar #296 to #256 - scorcho (01/06/2013) [-]
so how many times exactly has someone broken into your home with the intention to rape your ugly ass? Never? Not surprising. Plus i live in germany, where there are no gun wielding psychopaths, so i think my chances of survival are pretty decent. It's called civilisation, dude, you should try it sometime.
User avatar #441 to #296 - dreamthrow (01/06/2013) [-]
Read the "Armed Citizen" section of the NRA magazine and maybe you'll understand guns better.
User avatar #360 to #296 - buzzin like a bee (01/06/2013) [-]
Dude, don't argue with stupid people. Especially about guns. They don't learn.
User avatar #301 to #296 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
oh your right. since ive never been robbed i should never be prepared. and not only that, i like having a gun just to go to the range and shoot. if you've never been you can't talk **** . great way to blow off some steam. just having that nice 45 long colt pop in your hand and put a little hole in the paper. i need to buy a shotgun for they limit how many the tube can hold this month....
User avatar #305 to #301 - scorcho (01/06/2013) [-]
nothing wrong with shooting on a shooting range.
#300 to #296 - airforceman (01/06/2013) [-]
Germany? No gun wielding psychopaths? Forgetting something?
#265 to #256 - scousaj (01/06/2013) [-]
Or ya know.. use reasonable force to stop the intruder instead of sending a bullet through his skull.
User avatar #288 to #265 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
i won't shoot for skull...its harder to hit. central mass mi amigo. Federal Flight 12 gauge with a flight control wad at about 10 yards makes a perfect baseball sized hole.
#212 to #20 - trowlernotparas (01/06/2013) [-]
It should be legal because the government doesn't have to say "No, that's bad" and take it away. We should legalize all drugs and let the stupid people kill themselves off. deal with it
User avatar #851 to #212 - redJericho (01/07/2013) [-]
Except what about all the innocents that would be killed from drunk 15 year olds driving down the street?

The world would be a scary-ass place if there were no laws.
User avatar #864 to #851 - trowlernotparas (01/07/2013) [-]
I only said no laws with these intoxicants. If it were my way every murderer would be dead within a week of their trial.
User avatar #648 to #212 - elcreepo (01/07/2013) [-]
That's drugs.

The difference is that with guns, stupid people have a tendency to kill other people before themselves.
User avatar #825 to #648 - trowlernotparas (01/07/2013) [-]
i was only talking about drugs in that post. stupid people shouldn't be allowed to come near a weapon
#564 to #212 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
Thats actually the system in several other countries, and they pay for the rehabilitation instead of the drug control. Its cheaper, easier, and they report incredibly lower crime and drug rates after shifting to that policy.
User avatar #544 to #212 - lamarisagoodname (01/07/2013) [-]
still shouldn't be letting call of duty love'in 14 year olds have access to goddamn automatic weapons, don't you agree? which isn't a restriction issue, it's a parenting issue
User avatar #419 to #212 - waaw (01/06/2013) [-]
I don't think you understand the concept of basic human empathy
User avatar #828 to #419 - trowlernotparas (01/07/2013) [-]
**** everyone they can die
User avatar #237 to #212 - blahness (01/06/2013) [-]
i don't think you understand the concept of "the government has to pay for medical fees for all those drug-related illnesses and deaths"
User avatar #406 to #237 - trowlernotparas (01/06/2013) [-]
they don't in the US
#294 to #237 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
In your commie state they do, in what America should be they wouldn't.
User avatar #888 to #294 - blahness (01/07/2013) [-]
last time i checked, canada wasn't a "commie state"
and i doubt the emergency services would just look at a dying person and say: no money? no service.
defeats the whole purpose of having emergency services
User avatar #26 to #20 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
but heroin IS bad you idiot. guns are not bad...its just a ******* tool!!! if heroin could be used as actual medicine i would understand it being legal!
User avatar #58 to #26 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
It can be used as a medicine.
Also, heroine is just a tool people use to get high.
User avatar #36 to #26 - nadastress (01/06/2013) [-]
Heroin is an opiate and thus for a pain reliever. Like morfine.
User avatar #407 to #36 - trowlernotparas (01/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #436 to #407 - nadastress (01/06/2013) [-]
My bad, my swedish sneaked in there a bit. (morfin)
User avatar #41 to #36 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
heroin is very dangerous. which is why they don't use it as medicine...and i swear if you say "well guns are dangerous" i might just pop you. guns are only dangerous in the hands of stupid people...you know a lady in congress says "high velocity clips" first of all...its high capacity...second of all...its a mag...not a clip. clips have no been used for centuries, at least on a large scale. ignorant people just trying to take my guns away.
#415 to #41 - xnotcreative (01/06/2013) [-]
Your logic: Guns aren't bad!

"i might just pop you''

You're the reason why guns should be illegal.

Also, guns are "bad" ******* , their purpose is to harm others, or to end a life. That's what they were made for, you can't argue differently.
User avatar #444 to #415 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
and be right back. i need to go scold my gun on how bad it is. how dare it just sit there and only do what i tell it to do! gee i better yell at my car too CARS KILL PEOPLE OH MY GOD. knives are bad, tall buildings are bad too! thats just asking for people to kill themselves!
User avatar #446 to #444 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
and watch out for the dihydrogen monoxide, that is REALLY bad, that kill plenty of people every year! we should outlaw that too!
User avatar #437 to #415 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
there purpose is to harm bad people.
and yes when my words are turned against me, that is frustrating, thus the joking threat.
There is no reason guns should be illegal. it really scares me thinking about how ugly its going to get if they ban them. What ever happened to this country being ran by the people? its turning into the government making silly rules for "our safety" little people can't design their home to fit themselves because its "dangerous" for normal sized people. THATS YOUR OWN ******* PROPERTY! tell me how ANYTHING you do on YOUR property is any of their business as long as no one else is being harmed or disturbed? it shouldn't be, but they make it their business. soon i won't even be able to take my handgun to the range.
#480 to #437 - xnotcreative (01/06/2013) [-]

That's the thing, you CAN'T trust everyone who owns a gun to not commit the same crime done in Connecticut.

You're trying to make a promise that EVERY gun owner will keep to themselves. That's just not possible.

And the analogies you're making do not make sense. You're comparing pebbles to mountains here.
User avatar #756 to #480 - Keleth (01/07/2013) [-]
about .1% of CCW holders lose their permit due to gun related crime. so yes, clearly the law abiding citizens are the problem.
User avatar #746 to #480 - Keleth (01/07/2013) [-]
about 1/4 of all guns used in crimes are actually legally owned by the criminal.
#748 to #746 - xnotcreative (01/07/2013) [-]
That doesn't help your cause...

You just showed me that even people licensed and TRUSTED with guns can be dangerous.

In other words: Guns aren't safe in the hands of anyone.
User avatar #768 to #748 - Keleth (01/07/2013) [-]
if the US would teach proper gun safety and have a better system for finding crazies it would be MUCH better...you can make explosives in your house and go bomb a school. you won't take as many with you, but youll still be a ******* celebrity. crazy people are crazy. and if murder is in your heart...your gonna kill. plain and simple. whether it be with a gun, knife, bomb, or a car.
#801 to #768 - xnotcreative (01/07/2013) [-]
Guns make it easier to kill...

What you're saying is... it's okay to make it easy for people to kill because they're going to kill anyway.

You're an absolute ****** idiot, and I refuse to engage any further in a conversation with you.

You are a thickheaded, completely ignorant ******* , that is EXTREMELY deluded.

Just ****** face it, GUNS MAKE IT EASIER TO KILL PEOPLE. What people are trying to do by outlawing it is to make the damage people can do to others minimal.

We might as well ****** have nuclear bombs ticking in all of our basements, because we're just going to kill anyways, right?

Out of all my months on FunnyJunk, you are by far the BIGGEST ****** idiot I have come across. Words can not even describe how ignorant and narrow minded you are.
User avatar #857 to #801 - Keleth (01/07/2013) [-]
whats the difference between a liberal and a sewer rat......some people actually like sewer rats.

ive said it many times that crazies are the problem. people who want to murder will murder, but most people will not. guns do make it easier to kill people...but so does no resistance
User avatar #761 to #748 - Keleth (01/07/2013) [-]
let me break it down a bit simpler....if im a legal gun owner...and i have a CCW....in the grand scheme of things...there is less than a 1% chance that i will murder someone, or even shoot someone besides self defense. you take away the Concealed permit and it does go up a bit, because it is easy to walk into walmart and buy a gun if your record is clean.
#769 to #761 - xnotcreative (01/07/2013) [-]
But there's still a chance you're going to murder someone...

Also, what the **** are you talking about? It just seems like you're spouting random gun facts at me.
User avatar #741 to #480 - Keleth (01/07/2013) [-]
http://gunowners.org/fs0404.htm give that a read
User avatar #438 to #437 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
harmed or disturbed in a way that they can't affect....coming into my house and you tripping is not my ******* fault. but me playing VERY loud music so that the neighbors are bothered, yes, that should be illegal, your **** is invading their property at that point.
User avatar #45 to #41 - nadastress (01/06/2013) [-]
Morfine and opiates are very dangerous in the wrong hands as well. I really don't care about either side of the gun debate. But if you say guns doesn't kill people you should agree that heroin doesn't either.
User avatar #48 to #45 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
heroin is addictive. it IS the persons fault...but NOTHING good comes from heroin. guns protect me. and id like someone to break into my house and question me on that.
#269 to #48 - scousaj (01/06/2013) [-]
How about if I broke into your house with a gun and shot you whilst you slept?
User avatar #280 to #269 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
my dogs are ******* motion detectors. i have one in the living room in a crate, and 1 in each bedroom. good luck.

but if you did...well...i guess i would be dead. in your scenario there is nothing i could have done. all my doors stay locked...breaking glass would be loud...the garage is RIGHT beside my 1 dog in the living room. the main door makes this weird airy sound whenever it opens or closes from the air rushing out of the canister thing at the bottom so it doesn't slam. ive tried my damnest to not make my dogs go off but that door always gets me. and the creaky ass wooden one behind it sucks too.
#286 to #280 - scousaj (01/06/2013) [-]
Meh, I don't even know where I was going with that.
User avatar #312 to #286 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
....and also...why would you shoot me in my sleep? why not just slam a knife through my throat and bring it forward? my lungs would be full of blood before i even wake up. why fire a loud gun and alert everyone? you would get COVERED in blood though....30 feet of blood spray man! but in that case a knife would be a better tool than a gun
#342 to #312 - scousaj (01/06/2013) [-]
Well, let me plan this out...

1.I'd bring dog food or steaks to please your dogs and keep them quiet.
2.My pistol (choose one) would have a suppressor to minimize sound.
3.I'd probably wear a thick coat that covers most of my body, just in case your dogs try to bite me... bit of padding. Wear a ski mask aswell
4. I would just lift the lock from your window and remove the window.
5. Feed dogs
6. Try to stay away from doors and step on the inside of stairs to reduce sound.
7. Slowly open your door and shoot you, whilst you're either still asleep or before you can react.
8. Seeing as you don't live alone I have a short window of time before the dogs have woken eveybody else up... I could either kill the rest of them or leave... I'd probably leave.
9. I don't care about getting caught because I'm mental (in this scenario) I'd probably go and turn myself in anyway.

Either that or just run in and spray and pray.
User avatar #413 to #342 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
i see one flaw in your plans.....we have no stairs!
User avatar #285 to #280 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
the little yappy one will just ******* bark even if it knows who it is. I DON'T GET IT! Bringing girls home is a nightmare, everyone gets woken up and the girl is like "um.....do they care?" my family does not give 1 **** though who i bring home ;)
#54 to #48 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
The thing no one ever tells you about heroin, and is that it's really nice....
User avatar #50 to #48 - nadastress (01/06/2013) [-]
It's a pain reliever. But in the wrong hands, deadly.
User avatar #51 to #50 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
its pain reliever with terrible side effects. why would you use it if you have 100 things that work better with none of the side effects? like selling your body to get some more.
#605 to #51 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
Its a pain "killer", not a pain reliever. A pain reliever is **** you buy off the shelves to make you more tolerant of minor pains (tooth ache, head ache, cramps, etc). Pain killers are analgesics which remove actual PAIN (car accidents, being impaled by metal, getting shot). And all pain killers (all drugs in general actually) have side effects. Every last one. And its absolutely no different from morphine, in terms of effect. In fact, most synthetic opiate pain killers have worse long term effects and even a worse addiction than heroin. I understand what you're saying, but at the end of the day, guns do have the potential to kill, just like cars have the potential to kill and drugs have the potential to kill. Should guns be taken away because they kill? In my opinion, no. Everything has the potential to kill. A spoon has the potential to kill. All you have to do is put it in the right hands.
User avatar #43 to #41 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
and thirdly they use Assault rifle for anything that looks scary...go read the ******* definition...a semi-auto rifle on an assault rifle base IS NOT AN ASSAULT RIFLE....its a semi-auto rifle, nothing more.

now their trying to say shotguns have too many rounds and they are going to ban online sale of ammo....so now you HAVE to buy it instantly? your getting rid of a 7 day waiting period caused by shipping?
User avatar #18 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
I always hear pro-gun people making this argument, "blah blah blah if guns kill people then my spoon eats my breakfast" **** like that. Not once have I heard ant-gun people say that people don't kill people, guns do. never.

This is such a retarded argument....
User avatar #219 to #18 - trowlernotparas (01/06/2013) [-]
liberal faggot you can move yourself to a place with gun control (if you aren't already there)
User avatar #228 to #219 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
I do, thank god, live in Ireland, ******* .

And I don't belong to any political party.
User avatar #21 to #18 - Jewssassin (01/06/2013) [-]
I have heard anti-gun people say owning a gun makes you more likely to kill someone. And there are anti-gun people that get legitimately scared when they are in the presence of a fire arm because they think they are in danger.
User avatar #28 to #21 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
if anything your more protected. i wanna hang around with the guy with the gun for as long as i can
User avatar #27 to #21 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
Well it is true the owning a gun makes you more likely to kill someone, many gun murders are done in the heat of the moment, because they have a gun then and there.

I live in Ireland, guns are completely illegal, not even police have guns. 0.4 out of 100,000 die every year to guns in Ireland, it was over 11 out of every 100,000 in America, that's a clear difference.
User avatar #31 to #27 - Jewssassin (01/06/2013) [-]
I've owned guns for awhile now. My friend has had them since he was 10, and I know many many other people that have owned various firearms for years. You know what we all have in common? We havent killed anyone. We dont want to kill anyone. Owning a gun does NOT make you more likely to kill someone.
The desire to kill someone makes you more likely too.
You give me cold hard proof and Ill believe you. Until that day, that thought process is total ******** .
User avatar #35 to #31 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
I'm quite sure that the fact that if I moved to America, I'm over 20 times more likely to be shot is proof enough...
User avatar #38 to #35 - Jewssassin (01/06/2013) [-]
Those people own guns because they want to kill people, not kill people because they own guns.
Besides I'ved lived outside of Baltimore, highest murder rate in America for 19 years, proud to say I've never been shot.
User avatar #44 to #38 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
But according to your logic, people who kill people with guns just want to kill people, and would do it without guns anyway. So why am I at less risk here in Ireland?

We have crazy people too....
User avatar #46 to #44 - Jewssassin (01/06/2013) [-]
Because you have less people, less people who want to kill people, less gangs, less black market for illegal weapons. Honestly most of it is that you have less gangs trying to kill each other.
Unfortunately this is a crime ridden country, but its not because of an inanimate object pushing its non-existant will on people to do its non-existant bidding.
User avatar #52 to #46 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
When I'm talking about murders here and America, I'm talking percentage per people, not total kills, so population has nothing to do with it.

Ireland most certainly does have gangs, and until recently, we had the IRA. Personally, I feel a lot safer without guns, if someone tries to break in to my house, they aren't going to have a gun, and they won't panic and shoot me, and I won't panic and shoot them either.
User avatar #61 to #52 - Jewssassin (01/06/2013) [-]
I never said you didnt have gangs, we just have more. Alot more.
I feel safer with guns. A good part is that, it is more likely for a criminal here to have a gun so I want to protect my self against that, but when it comes down to it, criminals are criminals. They dont obey the law, thats why they are criminals. Why should they care if guns are illegal? If they can get them they will. And the thing with America is that if they tighten on restrictions or do an all out ban, that will just mean people like me wont get to have guns to protect themselves, and since guns and a black market for guns has always been in America, it will be easier for criminals here to get guns then criminals there.
User avatar #29 to #27 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
crazy people be crazy. i don't even understand how people do that. when people threaten me, i call the ******* cops. i don't act like a big man and bring out my gun. you will only see my gun if my life is in immediate danger. so i want you to sit there and tell me im a danger to society and i don't deserve to protect myself
User avatar #32 to #29 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
You are one person with a gun, I don't know you, nothing you say can convince me your a sane person over the internet....

Your gun is one of an obscene amount in America, millions upon millions. Now you tell me that no people in America have anger issues, can be a bit crazy, and maybe give in to a second of impulse.
User avatar #37 to #32 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
yep insane people exist...SO GET RID OF THE INSANE PEOPLE...id be fine with a psych test before you can buy guns. but don't take away my ability!
User avatar #42 to #37 - xkmarcus (01/06/2013) [-]
You don't have to be insane, I mean come on, a fairly big percentage of gun murders are done in the heat of the moment, and even if it wasn't a fair few, even if it was only one, isn't one enough?
User avatar #47 to #42 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
a fair amount of people don't rob houses because they thing "....dude...what if that guy has a gun!" guns are a bigger deterrent than anything. bro i got friends who have schematics for a fully auto mac 10 and yes, they have the tools in their garage to make it...and they make suppressors as well. youll never get rid of the guns. you should teach your kids about, teach them proper gun handling and why you NEVER pull one out unless you are going to shoot. know your target and whats behind it, so on and so forth. all these murderers were probably just kids who didn't get their ass beat enough. THEY are the problem. taking away guns does nothing except create chaos. but they are being smart by "grandfathering" guns will just slowly disappear until all of our teeth are gone...and then the government has us. we literally have no way to fight back with anything. and suddenly a ground fight on US soil isn't so insane for other countries.
#19 to #18 - barehype (01/06/2013) [-]
Yeah that's what I think, the point isn't that the guns are some kind of living organism which kill people by themselves, it's just that having guns legalised makes killing people so much easier and someone with homicidal thoughts might otherwise think against murdering someone if they didn't have a gun at their disposal.
#17 - semisane ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
>Implying guns aren't tools for killing
#704 to #17 - anonymous (01/07/2013) [-]
I believe OP is stating that without improper usage by people, guns are about as safe as a knife is.
User avatar #580 to #17 - xenigma (01/07/2013) [-]
cars kill more people then guns but we don't ban cars. People will find a way to murder each other no matter what.
User avatar #913 to #580 - semisane ONLINE (01/07/2013) [-]
I'll say it again, slowly, so you can understand.
Guns are tools for killing.
Cars are tools for transportation that are dangerous if used improperly.

The fact that people will try to kill each other anyways is exactly the reason why we shouldn't be giving them tools to do it more efficiently.
You see a pyromaniac, you don't say "well, he'll find a way to burn **** anyways, so we might as well give him a flamethrower". So why would you think that's an acceptable excuse for guns?
#485 to #17 - cockasian (01/06/2013) [-]
implying that citizens possessing lethal weapons for protection purposes doesn't discourage crime and keep the government from gaining too much power over its citizens.

I know a lot of people use Hitler as an example much too often, but in his power he completely made guns illegal, and confiscated all deadly firearms. Then he, you know, took absolute and complete control over his citizens.
User avatar #260 to #17 - fuelnfire (01/06/2013) [-]
Knives, baseball bats, fists, doesn't matter. People are violent, aggressive, and prone to killing each other over trivial matters. Before we had gun we just killed each other with whatever we had. MFW people think if guns are taken away anything will change, the killers will just get more creative. I agree that more gun control could be introduced, but people are violent.
User avatar #451 to #260 - rokkarokkaali (01/06/2013) [-]
I'd rather die from one bullet than get beaten to death by a guy with a baseball bat.
User avatar #369 to #260 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
So what you're saying is, " **** it, they'd kill each other anyways, might as well give them a tool to kill the maximum amount of things in the minimum amount of time."
User avatar #922 to #369 - fuelnfire (01/08/2013) [-]
Let's take a clinical look at the mass killings. Near 1000 rounds expended at Colorado, hundred of other shots were fired, and the death tolls were not actually that high, compared to bombings in Isreal, or Hamas. Hell, mines in Egypt, Vietnam, and Cambodia kill more kids a year than guns, but everyone is being spooked by American childrens deaths. I'm sorry for the loss of those people, but banning guns will not make that issue disappear. Several rural families rely on guns to protect their farmland and property from thieves and such, and be perfectly honest. If you had a gun, for personal use, on your belt, and you were at a mall, and you saw a gunman gunning down children and innocent people, would you not shoot him? Many would be robbers and mass murderers are stopped by average joes with their concealed carry license, but the media does not make money from "Joe Schmoe saves woman from rapist in alleyway shooting, gets 2 years of trials, is put on a watch list, and is ostracised at large?" The media makes money from fear, excitement, and politics. And a gun is not the end all be all of weapons. Seriously? Remove guns, and we'll see worse. Let's think, how bout some bombs. Fertilizer, propane tanks, H2S, all easily accessible, and extremely dangerous. Park a fertilizer bomb van in front of a school at lunch, hide bucket sized homemade bombs around a mall, disguised as backpacks, the list goes on. Guns are not magical death spitting assault weapons, they spit little metal projectiles smaller than a thumb usually, to kill someone would take a lot of ammo, time, or accuracy. A home made bomb, or stabbing someone in a subway station? Simple.
User avatar #926 to #922 - cullenatorguy (01/08/2013) [-]
You're a little late
User avatar #385 to #369 - inspectah (01/06/2013) [-]
I think he is saying that even if we did ban guns the only thing that would be different is the way people are murdered, and if we banned guns we couldnt hunt which would create a giant incline in animal population which the ecosystem would be prepared for.
User avatar #402 to #385 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
I doubt it. It's much harder to do drive-bys or just walk up and stab someone. Most gun related violence would be in the ghettos and hoods of large cities. I think the death rate would go down tremendously. We need hunting though to keep the ecosystem intact, but hunting of the species that aren't supposed to be in any given ecosystem needs to go up.
User avatar #488 to #402 - revanthewin (01/06/2013) [-]
The only problem with that is that people in the ghetto tend to not follow the law, especially if they're someone who would kill a person.
User avatar #394 to #385 - inspectah (01/06/2013) [-]
User avatar #278 to #260 - semisane ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
See my reply to Crusader. Knives and baseball bats aren't designed to kill. Yeah, people are aggressive. So how about we don't make it so easy for them to get their hands on deadly machines that can be used to easily kill people? Guns are, by design, built to help them kill others. You're not going to see a newspaper headline saying "School stabbing, 20 children dead", because that's really ******* inefficient. Maybe we shouldn't be giving people easy ways to turn their anger into murder.
User avatar #923 to #278 - fuelnfire (01/08/2013) [-]
That's ironic, I believe a man in China recently stabbed 20-30 school children. It's not the US though isn't it.
User avatar #275 to #260 - awesomanium (01/06/2013) [-]
Knives can be used for chopping food
Baseball bats are for playing baseball, they're not called killing bats
Fists are clenched hands, and hands have millions of uses
Guns are only used for killing
User avatar #292 to #275 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
Guns can be used for marksmanship
Nail guns are used for nailing stuff together
potato gunsa re used to launch potatos, and occasionally messages

I can say that explosives are used JUST to kill people, but they aren't, that's an ignorant viewpoint, they have non-lethal uses as well, jsut like everything else, saying that guns are just killing machines, is like saying that dynamite is just a tool for blowing people up, knives are just used for stabbing people, baseball bats are just used for beating people.
User avatar #289 to #275 - fuelnfire (01/06/2013) [-]
In this modern age you can use them for competitions, hunting, a lot of people forget that. A lot of competition shooters have never fired at a living being in their life, animal or human, but make their living by a gun. Farmers, outdoorsmen.
User avatar #59 to #17 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
>Implying knives aren't tools for killing
#443 to #59 - wooyoungkim (01/06/2013) [-]
Yes, because a man running around with a knife is so much harder for law enforcement to subdue then a man running around with an ar-15
#924 to #443 - fuelnfire (01/08/2013) [-]
Yes, because law enforcement can see a knife inside someone's pocket in the middle of a mall with their x-ray vision. Law enforcement has not been present during any of the recent shootings until after the victims were shot, that point is moot anyways. Hitler, Stalin, most of histories worst mass murders were not done by men who had easy access to guns, they were done by psychos, people who were not right in the head. Rather than banning guns, perhaps the world should take a step back and see what the **** drives people to these events.
User avatar #929 to #924 - wooyoungkim (01/08/2013) [-]
Yes, because you can't hide pistols either.

Australia, UK, South Korea

What do these three countries have in common?
-Firearm regulations
-Less murders then the United States

You must be a ******* idiot. To tell you the truth, I know gun laws won't work in the US, I'm just saying how stupid people like you are who defend firearms and say there's nothing wrong with it.
User avatar #854 to #443 - Crusader (01/07/2013) [-]
Well no, depending on the situation either or could be more difficult, in an area that has small rooms and narrow hallways, a knife would be better, because a rifle would just get in the way.
But in the same line of thought, if you are out in a field, a rifle is going to be better than a rifle.

I never said anything close to what you tried to imply, I simply said that knives are tools for killing as much as anything else.
User avatar #874 to #854 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
If I was a police officer attempting to subdue a killer in a small building, I would still rather have him have a knife than a ******* firearm.
User avatar #879 to #874 - Crusader (01/07/2013) [-]
Well no.
That's just ignorant.
20 pace rule.
WIthin 20 paces a knife is more lethal than a firearm because of the time it takes for a firearm to chamber a new round after each shot, not to mention the amount of time to it takes to at least partially aim.
Someone well trained with close quarters combat will beat someone that is trained to use a gun within 20 paces 9/10 times.
User avatar #900 to #879 - wooyoungkim (01/07/2013) [-]
Yes, because there is a building that is only filled with tiny ass room where there won't be room for more than 20 paces. How stupid are you?

Besides, you realize there are PISTOLS, firearms made for compact places. That's why police officers and SWAT teams tend to carry compact SMGs and pistols (beat cops carry this for easier mobility as well).

According to your logic, why arm the entire swat teams with knives when they are clearing a small room?
User avatar #925 to #900 - fuelnfire (01/08/2013) [-]
You have never tried to fire a handgun accurately rapidly have you. A cornered man with a knife within 20 feet is one of the first drills they teach you as an LEO, if they're within 20 feet, you're probably dead if your handgun is not drawn.
User avatar #930 to #925 - wooyoungkim (01/08/2013) [-]
No. As a matter of fact, if you look at my username you can guess I'm Korean. In South Korea we have mandatory service so I actually did shoot rifles when I was in the military.

Also, although you maybe right about being in tight corners with a man and a knife, you should also realize how stupid you sound while you are arguing against my point about how firearms are more dangerous than a knife.

Is that what you think? Why not equip troops with better knives than trying to invent a better firearms! I mean, the enemy or criminals are always going to be 20 feet in front of you right?
User avatar #931 to #930 - fuelnfire (01/08/2013) [-]
Rifles and handguns are different. IMO, a handgun is a way to fight to your carbine or rifle. With a handgun, nothing but a CNS shot will take down someone instantly, and motivated people will still stab you with a few 9mm or .45s in their arms or gut. Not necessarily a guarantee, but knives do have their place, and not every LEO is a crack shot with a handgun. Pistol irons get obscured in dark areas, and even with night sights and lights, a lot of people will panic and fire at shapes, and miss the CNS. With a knife, you can easily aim for the throat, it provides more room for error, or nerves. There was a state trooper who once fired his handgun until slide lock at a suspect, missed every shot, then was killed by a single headshot, from within 20 yards.

I apologise for accusing you of ineptitude, but as a sworn LEO, one of the things drilled into me was that knives and bats are no joke, and in a typical house, or department store, they can be far worse than firearms in untrained hands. Yes, someone well trained could put several COM rounds into someone in a few seconds, but not everyone is trained to do that, raking a blade over a throat, or swinging a bat are nearly instinctive. I don't want to argue with you, so I'll take your point, but military tactics and weapons do not always apply to law enforcement issues in the same method. Depending on the building, you are right though, I would prefer a suspect to be armed with a knife. Good day, and thanks for informing me on South Korea's draft policy, I genuinely did not know that.

TL;DR - Good points by you, and I now agree, you are right mostly, just keep in mind that knives can be as deadly as a glock.
User avatar #933 to #931 - wooyoungkim (01/08/2013) [-]
Okay, and I apologize coming in to rash to inform you about your opinion. And okay, I understand your point. I think you may have misread my argument and I understand. What I was trying to say was the firearms are more dangerous than knives, however there are cases when knives can be more effective than firearms. I think you misinterpereted me. Thank you for educating me on what you know as an officer. And again I apologize for insulting you while trying to make a point.
User avatar #917 to #900 - Crusader (01/07/2013) [-]
I never said that there is a building with only areas with less than 20 paces, but normally during a situation that involves SWAT, they are going to be within 20 paces before anything happens.
The 20 pace rule applies when both parties are ready to draw, but neither has.
20 pace rule still affects pistols, as a pistol is still far less lethal in close quarters than a knife.

According to my logic, is it is a good SWAT team, they should be able to reach the criminal without even having to fire a weapon, 9/10
According to my logic,
#455 to #443 - Crusader has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #62 to #59 - semisane ONLINE (01/06/2013) [-]
Knives are tools for cutting fruit, vegetables, bread, and meat, for spreading butter, and tons of other crap. Name something guns are intended for other than killing things or practicing killing things.
User avatar #391 to #62 - inspectah (01/06/2013) [-]
target practice, competition, you have nailguns, you have potato launchers to just have fun with,
User avatar #64 to #62 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
Knives were originally made in order to be able to hunt and kill things more easily, and have evolved from there.
Who knows, maybe guns will be used for something else in the future.
User avatar #98 to #64 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
Yes, I'll go get my .50 cal to go cut up my orange. All my knives are in the washer.
User avatar #101 to #98 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
That's what they were used for originally.
Do people forget about nail guns and such?
It's a tool, that's a gun.
User avatar #104 to #101 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
.50 cals were not originally made for cutting oranges...

Nail guns came after real guns, and are still very dangerous.
User avatar #108 to #104 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
I was saying that knives were originally used to kill people

Kitchen knives came after daggers, and are still very dangerous.
Hell, most knives came after the primitive ones that were use to kill stuff, they didn't use them for construction or preparing stuff, as the earliest known record of humans using knives is for hunting and nothing else.
User avatar #112 to #108 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
The first knives were more or less used for cutting up food, which then became a hunting weapon. Guns were invented to kill people, not hunt. Hunting came afterwards.
User avatar #121 to #112 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
The first knives were sharp stones, which were used for hunting before other things.
Guns are jsut an evolution of cannons, which are an evolution of ballistae, which was an evolution of bows, which were use for hunting
User avatar #128 to #121 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
No, ballistae were not a previous form of cannon. Cannons used gun powder. Ballistae used tension is bows, rather large ones. Neither took the other's place until cannons were improved upon.

The first knives were first used as tools for cutting meat, wood, and other material. They were a tool first and foremost, not a killing device.
User avatar #144 to #128 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
This is the evolution of knives
Naturally sharp rocks that early man chased animals onto (look at the natives all around the world, they chased animals off of cliffs or into pits that usually had sharp rocks at the bottom) or they took sharp rocks and threw them at the prey.
They then make hard rocks and make sharp things, knives, spears, etc.
Therefore the first "true knives' were tools used for many things, but the first knife-like objects were naturally sharp rocks used for hunting, when we created the knife, we were not thinking of construction like we do today, it was more or less gathering leaves and branches and making a lean-to if anything, since they were mainly nomadic.

As for guns and bows.
First you have the spear/sling which launches a projectile,
That evolves to the bow, which uses a tension string to launch a projectile/sling evolved into the trebuchet and catapault
Then a ballistae which was a larger bow, a larger projectile
The cannon added gun powder in to launch a projectile, yes, the cannon is based roughly off of the ballistae
the cannon then gradually was refined into an arkabus which would have been the equivalent of the crossbow, which then was refined into a musket, then a bolt action, and so on.
Whereas shotguns were refined and stayed the basic cannon idea, but with multiple cannon balls.
User avatar #154 to #144 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
I'm not even going to argue with you. I give three perfectly good links supporting my side, and you respond with a comment too long for me to care to read. Ask any archaeologist, knives were used for hunting after they were used for cutting.
User avatar #164 to #154 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
I've laid out my argument clearly, the fact that you are to ignorant to even want to read it just makes me question the validity of your argument.
The frist true knives that were made by man were used for cutting, but the first knife-like objects that were used were used for hunting.
User avatar #208 to #164 - cullenatorguy (01/06/2013) [-]
Good for you, I don't need someone's opinion on the internet to validate or invalidate the evidence provided. Good day to you, sir.
#67 to #64 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
They were meant for many things, sure killing was one of them, but it was also for cutting leather etc. Can I cut leather with a rifle?
User avatar #70 to #67 - Crusader (01/06/2013) [-]
Knives were originally meant to hunt and kill with and since then are used for tools.
Guns were created to hunt and kill people with, much like the bow, and since then they are a symbol of strength and leadership, just like the sword, which is essentially a giant knife.
You could cut leather with a rifle, just not efficiently.
#33 to #17 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
Sporting guns aren't, but yeah most of them are pretty much.
#22 to #17 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
exactly, they don't kill people but why make it easy for people to do so with them?
User avatar #30 to #22 - Keleth (01/06/2013) [-]
most guns only kill the bad guys. and no, cops are slow as **** and rarely get there in time.
#470 to #30 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
Do you have anything to backup that statement? And how did the become "bad guys" to begin with?
User avatar #738 to #470 - Keleth (01/07/2013) [-]
google it dude...depending on where you live, and i live in ******* , it takes from 7-10 minutes. which is ALOT of time. and they become bad guys when they want my belonging without my permission.
#16 - graphenz (01/06/2013) [-]
This again? don't you ever get sick of this debate?
User avatar #15 - mikek (01/06/2013) [-]
Why is this in stoner humor yo
#12 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
yes... that's EXACTLY why you ******* overseas need guncontrole... a bunch of morrons trying to hide their stupidity with lame sarcasm... (hint: the reason is hidden in the first part of the last sentence...)
#13 to #12 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
where I agree with gun control, you spelled it like a retard. so I must now call you a massive ******** .
#167 to #13 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
my utmost apologies for not beeing a native speaker of the english language...
#11 - anonymous (01/06/2013) [-]
Today I went to my local mall without a gun and tried to perforate people from mid range using only my "people kill people" attitude. I must be better behaved than I thought becase it didn't work!
User avatar #9 - lavitts (01/06/2013) [-]
I was going to ask why a gun was in stoner-humor, but then I read the story and knew why.
#5 - fourtwentt (01/06/2013) [-]
******* guns, in stoner humor

pic is guns *******
User avatar #39 to #5 - KakashiHatake (01/06/2013) [-]
where can I make stuff like that? :O
#6 to #5 - pourqee (01/06/2013) [-]
Stuff you do dim man. Just beacuse I didn't start off a sentence with OMG. I WAS SO HIGH THIS ONE TIME. Doesn't mean it isn't stoner humour.

Actually to tell the truth I posted it in the channel accidentally.
User avatar #8 to #6 - fourtwentt (01/06/2013) [-]
i just wanted to post ******* guns
User avatar #7 to #6 - fourtwentt (01/06/2013) [-]
musta been high lol
#4 to #2 - SirJohnson (01/06/2013) [-]
what is this you have presented me with?
 Friends (0)