Performance Audit Report on the Control of F MD However, review of documents revealed that the DVS lacked a clear guideline on  resource allocation in terms of manpower and vehicle allocation particularly at  district level which the department could use to guide and monitor its resource  allocation. Such a guide could also be used by the OAG as a yardstick to assess  the efficiency of DVS resource utilisation in FMD control. Assessment of the Department’s resource allocation during the audit revealed  some inconsistencies in resource allocation as illustrated in  Table 6  (showing  data only from the districts sampled during the audit). Table 6: Resource Allocation at selected Veterinary Districts As the table shows for instance, basing on the proportion of length of fence  relative to resources allocated (in terms of both manpower and vehicles) Maun  District was allocated relatively the most resources. Conversely, Shakawe  District which had longer fence network and a relatively bad terrain (swampy  and sandy) compared to Selibi Phikwe was allocated relatively fewer resources. 44 |  P a g e TRANSPORT ALLOCATION  STAFF ALLOCATION  DISTRICT FENCE  Length  (KM)  TRUCKS  VANS  (L/CRUISERS)  TRACTORS  PICKETERS  FENCE  ERECTORS  GATE  KEEPERS  HUSBAN D MAN  HEALTH  Technica l staff  (TO's &  VO's)  Francistown  595  2 (not  operational  2 (not  operational 1 (not  operational 56  15  21  0  2  Nata  667  5 (3 not  operational  6 (4 not  operational) 3 (2 not  operational) 21  30  65  0  8  Selibi  Phikwe  717  3 (2 not  operational  8 (2 not  operational 1 ( not  operational 69  17  109  6  9  Maun  1106  15 (11 not  operational  23 (10 not  operational)  4  0  54  96  12  25  Shakawe  1070  5 (4 not  operational  2 (not  operational) 4 (2 not  operational 6  23  30  4  3  Source:  Files from DVS Administration Division (Head Quarters)