●  Tariffs schedules for communications between satellite mobile networks and between satellite mobile  networks and fixed-line communications networks or mobile communications networks shall both be set by  the call-originating service providers. Revenues or any uncollectible accounts from such the tariffs shall go to  the call-originating service providers.  ●  Tariffs schedules for communications between the E. 164 VoIP networks provided by the Type I service providers  and mobile telecommunications networks, or local telephone networks, or satellite mobile networks shall be set by  the call-originating service providers. Revenues or any uncollectible accounts from such tariffs shall go to the call- originating service providers.  Bottleneck Facilities  Under the Telecommunications Act, when a Type I service provider cannot construct bottleneck facilities within a  reasonable period of time or substitute those facilities with other available technologies, it may request for co-location on a fee  basis from the owner of the facilities located at the bottleneck of the relevant telecommunications network. The owner of the  facilities so requested may not reject these requests without due cause. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications  had the authority, now held by the National Communications Commission, to prescribe facilities as bottleneck facilities, and  has prescribed bridges, tunnels, lead-in tubes and telecommunications chambers located within buildings and horizontal and  vertical telecommunications cables and lines as bottleneck facilities in relation to fixed line telecommunications networks.  The National Communications Commission, in an announcement on December 21, 2006, has defined local loop facilities  as the “bottleneck” of the telecommunications network and amended the Administrative Rules for Network Interconnection  Between Telecommunication Service Providers in April 2007, providing that we, as a Type I service provider, can only charge  other local telephone service providers at cost for local loop services. The rental tariff is derived from a cost basis and must  be approved by the National Communications Commission each year.  The Ministry of Transportation and Communications is responsible for allocating all telecommunications related  frequencies primarily according to the standards set by the International Telecommunications Union. The National  Communications Commission is responsible for the licensing of operators to use these frequencies. The 900 MHz and 1,800  MHz frequency bands have been allocated for mobile applications. A total of 40 MHz of FDD spectrum around the 850 MHz  frequency band and a total of 110 MHz of FDD spectrum and 20 MHz of TDD spectrum around the 2 GHz band have been  allocated for 3G mobile services.  Spectrum Allocation  Provision of Universal Services  Frequency allocation for fixed wireless platforms, such as wireless local loop and local multipoint distribution system,  has already been set. Only some bands of the spectrum made available for these services are completely clear and there is  partial usage in all other bands. The cost of frequency usage will be based on quantity, bandwidth and the transmitting power.  Under the Telecommunications Act, a Type I service provider may be required by the National Communications  Commission, previously the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, to provide universal telecommunications  services in remote or unprofitable areas. These services include voice communication services, such as public phones, and  data communication services, such as internet provision for libraries and public primary and secondary schools. All Type I  service providers and certain Type II service providers designated by the National Communications Commission, previously  the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, will be required to contribute a fixed portion of their annual revenues to  a universal services fund. Such a fund will be used to compensate for any losses, bad debts and management fees incurred by  62 P AR T I