May  7,  2009  15  US 2009/0117314 Al  TABLE2  TABLE 3-continued  TABLE3  (Exarn12les according to the invention)  Amount added  Variation of  Type of addition  after last basket  Electric  the electric  Phenolic OH  Ex.  after last basket  reactor  field strength field strength  content  No.  reactor  [ppm]  [kV/m]  [kV/m]  [ppm]  20  Tartaric acid  30  +5  9  440  21  Tartaric acid  50  0  8  440  22  Tartaric acid  100  9  8  450  23  Malic acid  50  -18  12  550  24  Malic acid  100  -6  12  570  25  Malic acid  200  +20  10  570  (Individual results for electrostatic  field measurements for Example 2)  Individual disc  Fmean  Fm;n  Fmax  nwnber  (kV/m)  (kV/m)  (kV/m)  -43.7  -59.5  -21.2  2  -43.7  -60.4  -24.5  3  -38.4  -59.7  -20.7  4  -39.0  -55.1  -18.5  5  -45.0  -61.2  -22.7  6  -40.5  -57.0  -23.6  7  -41.1  -58.5  -24.4  8  -41.0  -57.9  -25.2  9  -41.0  -63.5  -28.3  10  -40.9  -62.9  -21.0  11  -39.6  -57.0  -23.1  12  -42.6  -60.9  -21.4  13  -37.9  -60.7  -18.9  14  -43.0  -57.5  -24.7  15  -41.0  -64.4  -27.1  16  -42.4  -58.7  -26.1  17  -42.0  -56.5  -23.8  18  -41.4  -60.9  -23.0  19  -42.6  -63.4  -20.3  20  -41.2  -60.5  -23.4  21  -47.2  -63.0  -23.2  22  -48.2  -62.4  -27.2  23  -41.3  -56.8  -23.4  24  -42.2  -63.3  -25.7  25  -41.3  -61.4  -19.7  26  -40.0  -58.2  -21.1  27  -40.4  -58.3  -20.7  28  -40.7  -63.5  -21.5  29  -42.5  -57.5  -23.7  30  -37.6  -59.9  -18.8  31  -40.7  -55.9  -22.9  32  -40.0  -60.8  -21.4  33  -35.9  -56.6  -21.0  34  -44.8  -54.8  -27.9  35  -41.2  -57.2  -24.7  36  -41.9  -61.7  -22.3  37  -40.4  -61.9  -20.4  38  -48.1  -60.3  -29.0  (Individual results for electrostatic  field measurements for Example 2)  Individual disc  Fmean  Fm;n  Fmax  nwnber  (kV/m)  (kV/m)  (kV/m)  39  -38.3  -59.4  -16.6  40  -25.2  -38.1  -15.5  41  -39.8  -58.0  -21.1  42  -39.2  -60.4  -20.0  43  -40.0  -59.0  -21.0  44  -41.4  -61.0  -19.6  45  -38.9  -60.0  -20.2  46  -20.8  -27.2  -13.8  47  -39.4  -58.3  -18.5  48  -39.7  -60.0  -22.3  49  -41.8  -60.5  -23.7  50  -41.3  -61.4  -29.3  51  -46.8  -63.1  -27.4  52  -24.0  -31.1  -17.2  53  -35.5  -56.3  -18.2  54  -40.8  -57.5  -24.8  55  -42.4  -61.8  -19.3  56  -38.8  -61.7  -25.6  57  -40.5  -58.7  -22.0  58  -42.1  -62.7  -27.4  59  -39.8  -57.7  -24.3  60  -45.3  -60.7  -27.9  61  -42.2  -56.0  -21.7  62  -37.6  -57.8  -19.2  63  -41.2  -61.6  -20.9  64  -34.8  -55.1  -18.7  65  -39.6  -58.9  -18.4  66  -41.5  -60.4  -20.4  67  -41.5  -60.2  -18.7  68  -43.2  -61.6  -25.8  69  -41.1  -58.1  -28.7  70  -43.6  -61.0  -20.8  71  -40.2  -61.9  -23.2  72  -40.7  -58.4  -22.6  73  -47.1  -61.8  -30.1  74  -42.4  -55.7  -23.0  75  -43.4  -58.7  -28.5  76  -39.0  -54.0  -18.3  77  -39.7  -53.8  -20.2  78  -23.4  -38.9  -14.5  79  -42.1  -60.7  -19.0  80  -43.3  -59.5  -27.8  81  -44.8  -61.8  -23.0  82  -42.1  -58.9  -21.7  83  -42.3  -58.0  -19.7  84  -40.0  -60.0  -17.4  85  -44.9  -57.0  -26.2  86  -44.5  -56.3  -24.7  87  -42.3  -58.7  -25.7  88  -33.3  -52.3  -17.8  [0217]  In Tab. 3 and 4, the individual electrostatic field  measurements for Example 2 and Example 21 are shown in  detail by way of example:  [0218]  For each disc, a mean electric field strength (F  mean)  was determined from the  200  individual values acquired per  revolution. Furthermore, the respective m1mm um field  strength value  (F  min)  determined per disc and the respective  maximum field strength value (F  max)  were determined. The  mean values for all  100  discs were then calculated from  F  mean’  F  min  and F  max• 