“(5) A person who contravenes a prohibition in paragraphs (1) to (3) commits an offence,  but—  16.  In regulation 31 (supply and delivery of dual-use goods), in paragraph (4) for “United  Kingdom, the Isle of Man” substitute “Territory”.  17.  In regulation 36 (brokering services: non-UK activity relating to dual-use goods and dual- use technology)—  18.  In regulation 38 (military activities or otherwise enabling or facilitating the conduct of  armed hostilities)—  19.  In regulation 41 (finance: exceptions from prohibitions)—  20.  For regulation 42 (exception for authorised conduct in a relevant country) substitute—  42. —(1) Where a person’s conduct outside the Territory would, in the absence of this  paragraph, contravene a prohibition in any of regulations 11 to 15 (asset-freeze etc.) or  Chapters 2 to 5 of Part 5 (Trade), the prohibition is not contravened if the conduct is  authorised by a licence issued under regulation 44 (Treasury licences) (as it has effect in the  United Kingdom) or regulation 45 (trade licences) (as it has effect in the United Kingdom).  ( a ) 2000 c. 8. Part 4A was inserted by the Financial Services Act 2012 (c. 21), section 11(2); and most recently amended by S.I.  2019/632.  7 “ Exceptions for authorised conduct outside the Territory  (c) omit paragraph (8).  (b) in paragraph (7), for the definition of “relevant institution” substitute—  (a) omit paragraph (6);  “non-Territory country” means a country that is not the Territory;  “third country” means a country that is not the Territory or Myanmar.”  ““non-Territory country” means a country that is not the Territory;”.  (a) in paragraph (2)(d), for “non-UK country” substitute “non-Territory country”;  (b) in paragraph (5), for the definition of “non-UK country” substitute—  (c) for paragraph (4) substitute—  (b) in paragraph (1), for “non-UK country”, in each place it occurs, substitute “non-Territory  country”;  (a) in the heading, for “non-UK” substitute “non-Territory”;  “(4) In this regulation—  (c) it is a defence for a person charged with the offence of contravening paragraph (3)  to show that the person did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that  the export was to, or the goods were for use by, the Myanmar security forces (as  the case may be).”  (b) it is a defence for a person charged with the offence of contravening paragraph (2)  to show that the person did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that  the goods were for military use in Myanmar;  (a) it is a defence for a person charged with the offence of contravening paragraph (1)  to show that the person did not know and had no reasonable cause to suspect that  the export was to Myanmar;  ““relevant institution”, in relation to the Territory, means a person domiciled in the  Territory who would satisfy the threshold conditions for permission under Part 4A of  the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000( a ) if it had its registered office (or if it  does not have one, its head office) in the United Kingdom.” 