8 comparing our multi-particle charged particle cor- relation predictions, and existing experimental cor- relation publications (see Sec. VII). We have also predicted correlations which can be used to search for evidence for the glasma color magnetic field (Sec. VII). Of course an obvious question that arises is that since a flux tube is an isolated system does a PBM bubble, that we assume is the final state of a flux tube at kinetic freezeout, also act as an iso- lated system when emitting the final state parti- cles? The near side correlations signals since the original PBM[6] have always come virtually entirely from particles emitted from the same bubble. Thus each bubble has always acted as an isolated system similar to the behavior of a flux tube. radial flow and are emitted from the surface. As in the parton bubble model these partons shower and the higher p t particles escape the surface and do not interact. These flux tubes are in the present paper considered strongly connected to the bubbles of the PBM. The method used to connect the PBM and the GFTM is described and discussed in the next section V. Q s is around 1 GeV/c thus the transverse size of the flux tube is about 1/4 fm. The flux tubes near the surface are initially at a radius ∼ 5 fm. The φ an- gle wedge of the flux tube is ∼ 1/20 radians or ∼ 3 ◦ . Thus the flux tube initially has a narrow range in φ . The large width in the Δ η correlation which in the PBM depended on the large spread in Δ η of the bubble partons results from the independent longitu- dinal color electric and magnetic fields that created the Glasma flux tubes. How much of these longitudi- nal color electric and magnetic fields are still present in the surface flux tubes when they have been pushed by the blast wave will be a speculation of this paper for measuring strong CP violation? It has been noted that significant features of the PBM that generated final state correlations which fit the experimentally observed correlation data[6, 12– 14] are similar to those predicted by the GFTM[17]. Therefore in the immediately following section we assume a direct connection of the PBM and the GTM, give reasons to justify it, and then discuss its consequences, predictions and successes. In heavy ion collisions at RHIC there has been observed a phenomenon called the ridge which has many different explanations[17, 23–30]. The ridge is a long range charged particle correlation in Δ η (very flat), while the Δ φ correlation is approximately jet- like (a narrow Gaussian). There also appears with the ridge a jet-like charged-particle-pair correlation which is symmetric in Δ η and Δ φ such that the peak on the jet-like correlation is at Δ η = 0 and Δ φ = 0. The Δ φ correlation of the jet and the ridge are ap- proximately the same and smoothly blend into each other. The ridge correlation is generated when one triggers on an intermediate p t range charged particle and then forms pairs between that trigger particle and each of all other intermediate charged particles with a smaller p t down to some lower limit. The first case we will study in this paper is a trigger charged particle between 3.0 to 4.0 GeV/c correlated with all other charged particles which have a p t between 1.1 GeV/c to 3.0 GeV/c. VI. THE RIDGE IS FORMED BY THE BUBBLES WHEN A JET TRIGGER IS ADDED TO THE PBM The successes of the PBM have strongly implied that the final state surface region bubbles of the PBM represent a significant substructure. In this subsection we show that the characteristics of our PBM originally developed to fit the precision STAR Au Au correlation data in a manner consistent with the HBT data; implies that the bubble substructure we originally used to fit these previous data is closely related to the GFTM. A natural way to connect the PBM bubbles to the GFTM flux tubes is to assume that the final state at kinetic freezeout of a flux tube is a PBM final state bubble. Thus the initial transverse size of a flux tube ∼ 1/4 fm has expanded to the size of ∼ 2 fm at kinetic freezeout. With this assumption we find consistency with the theoretical expectations of the GFTM. We can generate and explain the trig- gered ridge phenomenon and data (see Sec. VI), thus implying the ridge is connected to the bubble sub- structure. We can predict and obtain very strong ev- idence for the color electric field of the glasma from In this paper we will investigate whether the PBM can account for the ridge once we add a jet trigger to our PBM generator[6]. However this trigger will also select jets which previously could be neglected because there was such strong quenching[9, 15, 16] of jets in central collisions. A jet trigger had not been used in the PBM comparison to all previous data. We use HIJING[8] merely to determine the expected number of jets to add for our added jet trigger. These jet particles were added to our PBM generator. Thus our PBM generator now had HI- JING generated background particles, bubbles of the PBM and added jet particles from HIJING. We have already shown that our final state particles come V. THE CONNECTION OF THE PBM AND THE GFTM