6 VII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS in this paper. In principle, other pulse sequences with varying τ may also give similar quantum Zeno and anti- Zeno effect. They may even have additional advan- tages [23, 28]. In addition, the strength and the dura- tion of the 2 π pulses are finite in practice. One could minimize the finite pulse effect by employing the phase alternation techniques [29] or the Eulerian protocols [30]. W. Z. is grateful for many helpful discussions with V. V. Dobrovitski, S. Y. Zhu, and T. Yu. This work was partially carried out at the Ames Laboratory, which is operated for the U. S. Department of Energy by Iowa State University under Contract No. W-7405-82 and was supported by the Director of the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Research of the U. S. Department of Energy. Part of the calculations was performed at the National High Performance Computing Center of Fudan University. the peak position ω$_{m}$ of the spectrum and the pulse delay τ . Instead of decreasing the decay rate, the pulsed two- level system shows decay freezing after many pulses at small τ and the freezing value of the survival probability of the initial excited state approaches 1 (no decay) with decreasing τ . In this paper, all the spectrums have single peak and we observe only single quantum Zeno and/or anti-Zeno region. Under some special circumstances where a mul- tiple peaks spectrum exists, one would expect multiple quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno regions. We have also as- sumed that the spectrum of the structured vacuum is time independent where the back action exerted on the vacuum by the two-level system has been neglected. A full quantum version of the coupling between the two- level system and the vacuum could possibly change the picture of the controlled decay at long times but the short time behavior would be intact in the weak cou- pling regime, because the back action is weak and needs a long time to manifest its effect on the two-level system dynamics. We consider only periodic pulse sequence ( τ is fixed) [1] P. W. Milonni, The Quantum Vacuum: An Introduc- tion to Quantum Electrodynamics (Academic Press, New York, 1994). [2] M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997). [3] L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical Resonance and Two- level Atoms (Dover Publication, New York, 1975). [4] E. Frishman and M. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. A 68 , 032717 (2003). [5] J. Evers and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 , 163601 (2002). [6] E. Frishman and M. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 , 253001 (2001). [7] G. S. Agarwal, M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 4271 (2001). [8] W. Vogel and D.-G. Welsch, Quantum Optics (Wiley- VCH, Weinheim, 2006), 3rd ed. [9] W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 41 , 2295 (1990). [10] W. M. Itano, D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. A 43 , 5168 (1991). [11] B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys. 18 , 756 (1977). [12] A. G. Kofman and G. Kurizki, Nature(London) 405 , 546 (2000). [13] G. S. Agarwal, M. O. Scully, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. A 63 , 044101 (2001). [14] M. C. Fischer, B. Guti´ errez-Medina, and M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 , 040402 (2001). [16] M. O. Scully, S.-Y. Zhu, and M. S. Zubairy, Chaos, Soli- tons and Fractals 16 , 403 (2003). [15] A. G. Kofman and G. Kurizki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 , 270405 (2001). [30] L. Viola, J. Mod. Opt. 51 , 2357 (2004). [29] C. P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992). [28] G. S. Uhrig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 , 100504 (2007). [27] U. Haeberlen, High resolution NMR in solids: Selective averaging (Academic Press, New York, 1976). [26] L. Faoro and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 117905 (2004). [25] L. Viola and S. Lloyd, quant-ph/9809058. [24] R.-B. Liu, W. Yao, and L. J. Sham, New J. Phys. 9 , 226 (2007). [23] B. Lee, W. M. Witzel, and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 , 160505 (2008). [22] W. Zhang, N. P. Konstantinidis, V. V. Dobrovitski, B. N. Harmon, L. F. Santos, and L. Viola, Phys. Rev. B 77 , 125336 (2008). [21] W. Zhang, N. P. Konstantinidis, K. A. Al-Hassanieh, and V. V. Dobrovitski, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 , 083202 (2007). [20] W. Zhang, V. V. Dobrovitski, L. F. Santos, L. Viola, and B. N. Harmon, Phys. Rev. B 75 , 201302(R) (2007). [19] For weak couplings, which are the case in the decay prob- lem we consider, high order nonlinear interaction between the two-level atom and multiple electric field modes is ne- glected. [18] We adopt the Schr¨ odinger picture instead of the usual interaction picture (e.g., Ref. [7]) for our convenience. Both pictures are equivalent in principle. [17] We have assumed the dipolar interaction has a symmetry such that 〈 e | ⃗ d · ⃗ E | g 〉 = 〈 g | ⃗ d · ⃗ E | e 〉 , where ⃗ d and ⃗ E are the dipole operator of the atom and the electric field of the light, respectively.