18 FIG. 11: A graph of the type which can lead to violations of generalized TMD-factorization in unpolarized scattering in real QCD. (1982). [hep-ph]]. [5] J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 261 , 104 (1985). J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper and G. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B 308 , 833 (1988). G. T. Bodwin, Phys. Rev. D 31 , 2616 (1985) [Erratum- ibid. D 34 , 3932 (1986)]. [6] J. C. Collins and A. Metz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 252001 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0408249]. [7] J. C. Collins, Phys. Lett. B 536 , 43 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0204004]. [8] D. Boer, P. J. Mulders and F. Pijlman, Nucl. Phys. B 667 , 201 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0303034]. [9] C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders and F. Pijlman, Phys. Lett. B 596 , 277 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0406099]. [10] S. M. Aybat and G. Sterman, Phys. Lett. B 671 , 46 (2009) [arXiv:0811.0246 [hep-ph]]. [11] A. Bacchetta, C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders and F. Pijlman, Phys. Rev. D 72 , 034030 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0505268]. [12] C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders and F. Pijlman, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 , 147 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0601171]. [13] A. Bacchetta, C. Bomhof, U. D’Alesio, P. J. Mulders and F. Murgia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 , 212002 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0703153]. [14] C. J. Bomhof, P. J. Mulders, W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 75 , 074019 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0701277]. [15] C. J. Bomhof and P. J. Mulders, Nucl. Phys. B 795 , 409 (2008) [arXiv:0709.1390 [hep-ph]]. [16] D. Boer, P. J. Mulders and C. Pisano, Phys. Lett. B 660 , 360 (2008) [arXiv:0712.0777 [hep-ph]]. [17] J.C. Collins and J.W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. D 75 , 114014 (2007). [18] J. Collins, arXiv:0708.4410 [hep-ph]. [19] J. W. Qiu, W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 650 , 373 (2007) [arXiv:0704.1153 [hep-ph]]. J. W. Qiu, W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 76 , 074029 (2007) [arXiv:0706.1196 [hep-ph]]. [20] W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 76 , 094013 (2007) [arXiv:0708.4398 [hep-ph]]. [21] S. J. Brodsky, D. S. Hwang and I. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 530 , 99 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0201296]. [22] J. Collins, PoS LC2008 , 028 (2008) [arXiv:0808.2665 [23] F. Hautmann, Phys. Lett. B 655 , 26 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0702196]. [24] J. C. Collins and F. Hautmann, JHEP 0103 , 016 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0009286]. J. C. Collins and F. Hautmann, Phys. Lett. B 472 , 129 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9908467]. [25] J. C. Collins, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34 (2003) 3103 [arXiv:hep-ph/0304122]. [26] C. p. Chang and H. n. Li, arXiv:0904.4150 [hep-ph]. [27] A. V. Belitsky, X. Ji and F. Yuan, Nucl. Phys. B 656 , 165 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0208038]. [28] F. Gelis, T. Lappi and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D 78 , 054019 (2008) H. Fujii, F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan, Nucl. Phys. A 774 , 793 (2006) [arXiv:hep-ph/0510053]. [29] I. Balitsky, arXiv:hep-ph/0101042. [30] D. Binosi and L. Theussl, Comput. Phys. Commun. 161 , 76 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ph/0309015]. D. Binosi, J. Collins, C. Kaufhold and L. Theussl, arXiv:0811.4113 [hep-ph]. [31] Because in Eq. (4) there is an integration over all k 1 T , one generally must be careful in treating the region where the t goes to zero in the hard part. For this paper, we are specifically interested in the collinear region where k 1 T is small, so we will assume that any contribution from t close to zero is removed by a cutoff on large k 1 T . [32] In a general proof of factorization, one may need to worry about cancellations in the “supersoft” region, k 1 T << Λ QCD , since we are now using a massless theory, in con- trast to Ref. [17]. In this paper, we are concerned mainly with gluons with k 1 T ∼ Λ QCD so these issues do not affect our argument. [33] In earlier sections we neglected gluon exchanges between active quarks because they do not lead to spin depen- dence. In the unpolarized cross section, the complete re- sult is obtained only after including interactions between active quarks. In the collinear regions they result in the same set of eikonal factors as in Eqs. (25, 26) and anal- ogous Wilson line contributions. The key point is that the usual steps that normally would lead to a cancella- tion of the factorization anomaly between different cuts of the same graph in collinear factorization, fails in the