Objective 6: Prioritising working areas and possible partners  Objective 7: Identifying communication opportunities 14  Refer to https://efsa.force.com/competentorganisations/s/ 13  Examples of communication plans using such insights should be developed. i) Identify opportunities for communication along the risk assessment process  related to the use of NAMs and NAM-based mechanistic risks assessment  outcomes, by using research methods and tools that provide societal insights  (incl. awareness, understanding, risk perceptions, expectations, sentiment  analysis). Such insights should be generated to inform any future  communication and engagement efforts in this area of work;  ii) The proposal should further specify how insights generated under point 7 i) can  be used to inform: a. a communication plan targeting risk managers and the public, highlighting  the benefits/opportunities for addressing risk assessment data gaps using  NAMs and for the incorporation of mechanistic understanding in the risk  characterisation; b. a communication plan targeting researchers developing NAMs to provide  information and increase their interest in the validation of the NAM methods  for regulatory use. i) Prioritise/rank working areas based on the outcomes of objectives 1 and 3  above;  ii) Prioritise/rank key opportunities for cooperation and possible partners based on  the outcomes of objective 5 above. Consider also the Article 36 list of competent  organisations$^{14}$ dedicated by Member States to assist EFSA with tasks within  the field of its mission;  iii) Based on the information collected and assessed under the other objectives provide: a) Explore if the outcome of objectives 2, 3 and 4 results in a revised problem  formulation for the implementation of NAMs in EFSA risk assessments  previously defined under objective 1, and provide recommendations for  integrating the identified gaps (e.g. work areas); b) a list of possible actions to be implemented by EFSA and at least five high  level recommendations for multi-annual, multi-partner projects, each  supported by a SWOT or equivalent analysis. 