try observed by the LEPS experiment. With a portion of Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$), the same set of parameters can reproduce both the data of γn → K $^{+}$Σ ∗− from the LEPS experiment and the data of γp → K $^{+}$Σ ∗ 0 from the CLAS experi- ment. On the other hand, without including Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$), the present data on γn → K $^{+}$Σ ∗− can be described by tuning a parameter h in the contact term, which means differ- ent choices of parameter h in the contact term for γn and γp reactions are needed. To distinguish the roles of Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$) and the contact term, different predictions of the two schemes are presented for future experimental study. (scheme I). Without the Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$) contribution, different parameter h need to be used for γn → K $^{+}$Σ ∗− and γp → K $^{+}$Σ ∗ 0 processes. The properties and couplings for Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$), the contact term, and the s-channel resonances still have some un- certainties and need further investigation. More data of broader energy range on these processes will be helpful to clarify the roles of the contact term and the Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$) resonance. In summery, we study the process of K Σ $^{∗}$(1385) pho- toproduction from the nucleons in the framework of the effective Lagrangian method. From recent studies, there is possibly a Σ state with J p = 1 2 − near 1380 MeV. We consider the case that Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$) may contribute to the ob- servables of K Σ $^{∗}$(1385) photoproduction in experiments. Our results show that the Σ( 1 2 $^{−}$) production can give large negative contribution to beam asymmetry, which helps to explain the large negative linear beam asymme- We thank Kanzo Nakayama and Yongseok Oh for the helpful discussions. This project is supported by the Na- tional Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 10905059, 10875133, 10821063, and by China Postdoc- toral Science Foundation and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2009CB825200). Acknowledgments IV. SUMMARY [1] R. Bradford et al. (CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 73 , 035202 (2006). [2] L. Guo and D.P. Weygand (CLAS Collaboration), in Pro- ceedings of the International Workshop on the Physics of Excited Baryons (NSTAR05) , edited by S. Capstick, V. Crede, and P. Eugenio (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006, pp. 306-309. [3] I. Hleiqawi et al. (CLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 75 , 042201(R) (2007); Phys. Rev. C 76 , 039905(E) (2007). [4] M. Nanova et al. (CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. A 35 , 333 (2008). [5] M.Q. Tran et al. (SAPHIR Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 445 , 20 (1998). [6] R.G.T. Zegers et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 092001 (2003). [7] M. Sumihama et al. (LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 73 , 035214 (2006). [8] M. Niiyama et al. , Phys. Rev. C 78 , 035202 (2008). [9] K. Hicks et al. (LEPS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 012501 (2009). [10] M.F.M. Lutz and Soyeur, Nucl. Phys. A 748 , 499 (2005). [11] M.D¨ oring, E. Oset, and M. Strattman, Phys. Lett. B 639 , 59 (2006); Phys. Rev. C 73 , 045209 (2006). [12] Y. Oh, C.M. Ko, and K. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. C 77 , [13] C. Helminen and D.O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A 699 , 624 (2002). [14] B.S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. A 35 , 325 (2008); Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 21 , 5552 (2006). [15] R. Jaffe and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 232003 (2003). [16] A. Zhang et al. , High Energy Phys. Nucl. Phys. 29 , 250 (2005). [17] J.J. Wu, S. Dulat, and B.S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 80 , 017503 (2009); arXiv:0909.1380 [hep-ph]. [18] H. Haberzettl, K. Nakayama, and S. Krewald, Phys. Rev. C 74 , 045202 (2006). [19] Particle Data Group, C. Amsler et al. , Phys. Lett. B 667 , 1 (2008). [20] S. Capstick, Phys. Rev. D 46 , 2864 (1992). [21] Y. Oh, K. Nakayama, and T.-S.H. Lee, Phys. Rep. 423 , 49 (2006). [22] S. Capstick and W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. D 58 , 074001 (1998). [23] D. B. Lichtenberg, Phys. Rev. D 15 , 345 (1977). [24] P. Vancraeyveld et al. , Phys. Lett. B 681 , 428 (2009). 045204 (2008). 7