TABLE V: The $^{4}$P$_{J}$ phase-shifts and the ϵ$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$$_{−}$ mixing parameter at E$_{lab}$ = 3 MeV for the potential models indicated. For the sake of comparison, the results of the PSA from Ref. [26] are given in the last row. $^{4}$P$_{1}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ $^{4}$P$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ $^{4}$P$_{5}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ ϵ$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$$_{−}$ AV18 22.03 24.24 24.08 -2.247 AV18+URIX 22.31 24.30 24.27 -2.314 AV18+TM’* 22.79 24.45 24.53 -2.453 AV18+URIX* 22.75 24.41 24.35 -2.375 AV18+N2LOL* 22.55 24.25 24.48 -2.394 PSA 21 . 77 ± 0 . 01 24 . 30 ± 0 . 01 24 . 26 ± 0 . 01 − 2 . 46 ± 0 . 01 0 1 2 3 4 5 r [fm] 0 50 100 150 Z 0 (r) 0 1 2 3 4 5 r [fm] -45 -30 -15 0 y(r) 0 1 2 3 4 5 r [fm] 0 5 10 15 T(r) F IG. 1: The Z$_{0}$ ( r ), y ( r ) and T ( r ) functions as functions of the interparticle distance r for the URIX (solid line), TM’ (dashed line) and N2LOL (dotted line) models. 22