18 Let us call the first pair Δ η 1 . The next pair (Δ η 2 having the same φ requirement) has to also lie inside the same bubble to show this correlation. Thus we require that there is only 10 ◦ between the average φ of the pairs. This implies that at most in φ no two pions from a given bubble can differ by more than 30 ◦ . In Fig. 15 we show two pairs which would fall into the above cuts. Δ η 1 and Δ η 2 are positive in Fig. 15. However if we would interchange the π + and π − on either pair the value of its Δ η would change sign. Finally the mean value shown on Fig. 15 is the mid- point between the π + and the π − where one really uses the vector sum of the π + and the π − which moves this point toward the harder pion. -2.0 < Δ η 1 + Δ η 2 < -1.0 region. This means there are more pairs of pairs aligned in the same direc- tion compared to pairs of pairs not aligned. This alignment is what is predicted by the color electric field effect presented above. In fact if one has plus minus pairs all aligned in the same direction and spread across a pseudorapidity range, locally at any place in the pseudorapidity range one would observe an increase of unlike sign charge pairs compared to like sign charge pairs. At small Δ η unlike sign charge pairs are much larger than like sign charge pairs in both the PBM and the data which agree. See Figs. 10, 11, and 14 of Ref.[6]. Figure 11 of Ref.[6] compares the total correlation for unlike-sign charge pairs and like-sign charge pairs in the preci- sion STAR central production experiment for Au Au central collisions (0-10% centrality) at √ s NN =200 GeV, in the transverse momentum range 0.8 < p t < 2.0 GeV/c[12]. The unlike-sign charge pairs are clearly larger in the region near Δ φ = Δ η = 0.0. The increased correlation of the unlike-sign pairs is 0.8% ± 0.002%. Figure 10 of Ref.[6] shows that the PBM fit to these data gives the same results. Fig- ure 14 of Ref.[6] shows that the CD = unlike-sign charge pairs minus like-sign charge pairs is positive for the experimental analysis. Therefore the unlike- sign charge pairs are considerably larger than the like-sign charge pairs. In fact this effect is so large and the alignment is so great that when one adds the unlike and like sign charge pairs correlations to- gether there is still a dip at small Δ η and Δ φ see Fig. 4 and Fig. 7 of the present paper. The statisti- cal significance of this dip in the two high precision experiments done independently from different data sets gathered 2 years apart[12, 14] is huge. It would require a fluctuation of 14 σ to remove the dip. This dip is also not due to any systematic error since both of the just cited precision experiments carefully in- vestigated that possibility; and found no evidence to challenge the reality of this dip. This highly sig- nificant dip ( ∼ 14 σ ) means that like-sign pairs are removed as one approaches the region Δ η = Δ φ = 0.0 at a rate much larger than regular jet fragmen- tation. Jet fragmentation does not have a dip in its CI correlation. Thus this is very strong evidence for the predicted effect of the color electric field. D. Color magnetic pionic measure. In Fig. 16 we show the correlation function of op- posite sign charge-particle-pairs paired and binned by the variable Δ η 1 + Δ η 2 with a cut | Δ η | greater than 0.9 between the vector sums of the two pairs. The events are generated by the PBM[6] and are charged particles of 0.8 < p t < 4.0 GeV/c, and | η | < 1, from Au Au collisions at √ s NN = 200 GeV. Since we select pairs of pairs which are near each other in φ they all together pick up the bubble cor- relation and thus these pairs of pairs over all show about a 4% correlation. In the 1.0 < Δ η 1 + Δ η 2 < 2.0 region the correlation is 0.5% larger than the After considering the color electric effect we turn to the color magnetic effect which causes up quarks to rotate around the flux tube axis in one direction, while the anti-up quarks rotate in the other direc- tion. So when a pair of quarks and anti-quarks are formed they will pickup or lose transverse momen- Considering the above cuts we defined a correla- tion function where we combine pairs each having a Δ η . Our variable is related to the sum of the abso- lute values of the individual Δ η ’s ( | Δ η 1 | + | Δ η 2 | ). We assign a sign to this sum such that if the sign of the individual Δ η ’s are the same it is a plus sign, while if they are different it is a minus sign. For the flux tube the color electric field extends over a large pseudora- pidity range therefore let us consider the separation of pairs | Δ η | greater than 0.9. For the numerator of the correlation function we consider all combina- tions of unique pairs (sign ( | Δ η 1 | + | Δ η 2 | )) from a given central Au Au event divided by a mixed event denominator created from pairs in different events. We determine the rescale of the mixed event denom- inator by considering the number of pairs of pairs for the case | Δ φ | lying between 50 ◦ and 60 ◦ for events and mixed events so that the overall ratio of this sample numerator to denominator is 1. By picking 50 ◦ < | Δ φ | < 60 ◦ we make sure we are not choosing pairs from the same bubble. For a simpler notation let (sign ( | Δ η 1 | + | Δ η 2 | )) = Δ η 1 + Δ η 2 which varies from -4 to +4 since we have an over all η acceptance -1 to +1 (for the STAR TPC detector for which we calculated). The value being near ± 4 can happen when one has a hard pion with p t of 4 GeV/c (upper cut) at η = 1 with a soft pion p t of 0.8 GeV/c (lower cut) at η = -1 combined with another pair; a hard pion with p t of 4 GeV/c at η = -1 with a soft pion with p t of 0.8 GeV/c at η = 1.