Table of Contents CITIZENS, INC. independent consultant contracts with Citizens by inducing or attempting to induce other independent consultants to terminate or reduce service to Citizens and disclosing confidential information. On January 25, 2019, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss certain claims alleged in the suit, and on April 11, 2019, the District Court denied the Defendants’ motion in its entirety. On May 29, 2019, Citizens, CICA Ltd. and CICA filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to bar the Defendants from continuing to engage in unfair competition and misappropriation of Citizens’ trade secrets and tortious interference with Citizens’ existing contracts with its independent consultants. A hearing for the preliminary injunction was held on August 12, 2019. On August 13, 2019, the District Court denied the application for a temporary injunction, and on August 31, 2020, the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, Texas affirmed the District Court’s decision. On September 10, 2019, Citizens, CICA Ltd. and CICA filed an amended complaint and added additional defendants to the lawsuit, including (i) Michael P. Buchweitz, Jonathan M. Pollio, Jeffrey J. Wood and Steven A. Rekedal, former Citizens executives and employees and, in the case of Steven A. Rekedal, a former Citizens independent consultant, (ii) First Trinity Financial Corporation, and Trinity American, Inc. (collectively, “First Trinity”) and International Marketing Group S.A., LLC, entities that have founded a business on the exploitation of Citizens’ trade secrets and goodwill, and (iii) Gregg E. Zahn, a First Trinity executive. The amended complaint asserted additional claims for breach of contract, conspiracy and unjust enrichment. The lawsuit is currently in discovery and, depending on the District Court's scheduling in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, is expected to proceed to trial in the second quarter of 2021. On September 2, 2020, the Company and its eight directors, Christopher W. Clause, J.D. Davis, Jr., Gerald W. Shields, Frank A. Keating II, Terry S. Maness, E. Dean Gage, Robert B. Sloan, Jr. and Constance K. Weaver, were named as defendants in a lawsuit (the “Colorado Litigation”) filed by the Foundation, which at the time was the sole holder of the Class B common stock of the Company, in the District Court of Arapahoe County of Colorado (the “Colorado Court”). The Foundation’s complaint requested: (i) a declaration by the Colorado Court that the Action by Written Consent of the Foundation (the “Written Consent”) to add director nominees to the Company’s board of directors ("Board"), which was delivered on August 13, 2020, was valid and enforceable; (ii) a declaration by the Colorado Court that the actions of the Board taken after the receipt of the Written Consent, including expanding the size of the Board and amending the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, was void and unenforceable; and (iii) immediate injunctive relief against the Board from taking certain actions outside the ordinary course of business. Additionally, the Foundation’s complaint requested: (i) the Company and the Board to indemnify the Foundation and its director nominees for any expenses incurred related to lawsuit; (ii) the existing Board members to reimburse the Company for any (A) Board fees received on or since August 13, 2020 and (B) reimbursements received for acquiring legal representation relating to the litigation; and (iii) the Colorado Court award the Foundation all fees and expenses incurred in pursuit of the litigation, including attorney fees. The Board believed the dispute between the parties was essentially whether the Foundation could unilaterally appoint members to the Board without regard to the process mandated in the Corporate Governance Guidelines of the Company, namely that the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the "Committee") is responsible for identifying, recruiting, interviewing, vetting and recommending potential director candidates and evaluating their qualifications, independence, potential conflicts of interest and other important considerations. The Board believed the Foundation had to first engage the Committee and provide the Committee with a chance to assess the candidates’ qualifications in accordance with the criteria adopted by the Committee. Colorado Litigation filed by the Foundation against the Company and the Board. On September 28, 2020, the Colorado Court entered a mutually agreed Status Quo Stipulation (the “Stipulation”). Pursuant to the Stipulation, the Board and its committees agreed not to direct or, to their knowledge after reasonable investigation, permit anyone on their or the Company’s behalf to take any significant action that is outside the ordinary course of business without the consent of the Foundation (each, a “Material Action”) until the Colorado Court made a determination on the merits or otherwise ruled on the Foundation’s motion for a preliminary injunction, if filed, whichever came first (the “Expiration Date”). Material Actions were outlined in the Stipulation and included, among other things: (i) creating or disbanding any committee of the Board or changing the composition of any such committee; (ii) forming any subsidiary or entering into any partnership or joint venture; (iii) issuing any equity securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, other than as required pursuant to the Company’s Stock Investment Plan and pursuant to the vesting, settlement or exercise of equity-linked awards outstanding as of September 2, 2020; (iv) acquiring, encumbering, pledging, disposing of or otherwise transferring any assets, December 31, 2020 | 10-K 32