PART II ITEM 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data formula. The plaintiffs allege various ERISA violations including, among other things, that the Plan’s cash balance formula discriminates against older employees; the conversion resulted in a wear away period (when the pre-conversion accrued benefit exceeded the post-conversion benefit); and these conditions are not adequately disclosed in the Plan. In 2008, the court issued a decision finding in favor of Cigna Corporation and the Cigna Pension Plan on the age discrimination and wear away claims. However, the court found in favor of the plaintiffs on many aspects of the disclosure claims and ordered an enhanced level of benefits from the existing cash balance formula for the majority of the class, requiring class members to receive their frozen benefits under the pre-conversion Cigna Pension Plan and their post-1997 accrued benefits under the post-conversion Cigna Pension Plan. The court also ordered, among other things, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. 2012. The Company will continue to vigorously defend its position in this case. Ingenix.  On February 13, 2008, State of New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo announced an industry-wide investigation into the use of data provided by Ingenix, Inc., a subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare, used to calculate payments for services provided by out-of-network providers. The Company received four subpoenas from the New York Attorney General’s office in connection with this investigation and responded appropriately. On February 17, 2009, the Company entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance resolving the investigation. In connection with the industry-wide resolution, the Company contributed $10 million to the establishment of a new non-profit company that now compiles and provides the data formerly provided by Ingenix. Both parties appealed the court’s decisions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that issued a decision on October 6, 2009 affirming the District Court’s judgment and order on all issues. On January 4, 2010, both parties filed separate petitions for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. Cigna’s petition was granted, and on May 16, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its Opinion in which it reversed the lower courts’ decisions and remanded the case to the trial judge for reconsideration of the remedy. The Court unanimously agreed with the Company’s position that the lower courts erred in granting a remedy for an inaccurate plan description under an ERISA provision that allows only recovery of plan benefits. However, the decision identified possible avenues of ‘‘appropriate equitable relief’’ that plaintiffs may pursue as an alternative remedy. The case was returned to the trial court and hearings took place on December 9, 2011 and March 29-30, 2012. Over the summer, the trial judge passed away after a long illness and the case was re-assigned. The Company was named as a defendant in a number of putative nationwide class actions asserting that due to the use of data from Ingenix, Inc., the Company improperly underpaid claims, an industry-wide issue. All of the class actions were consolidated into Franco v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company et al.,  that is pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The consolidated amended complaint, filed on August 7, 2009, asserts claims under ERISA, the RICO statute, the Sherman Antitrust Act and New Jersey state law on behalf of subscribers, health care providers and various medical associations. On September 23, 2011, the court granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. The court dismissed all claims by the health care provider and medical association plaintiffs for lack of standing to sue, and as a result the case will proceed only on behalf of subscribers. In addition, the court dismissed all of the antitrust claims, the ERISA claims based on disclosure and the New Jersey state law claims. The court did not dismiss the ERISA claims for benefits and claims under the RICO statute. Plaintiffs filed a motion to certify a nationwide class of subscriber plaintiffs on December 19, 2011, which was denied on January 16, 2013. Plaintiffs petitioned for an immediate appeal of the order denying class certification, that the Company opposed. On December 20, 2012, the new trial judge issued a decision awarding equitable relief to the class. The court’s order requires the Company to reform the pension plan to provide a substantially identical remedy to that ordered by the first trial judge in 2008. Both parties appealed the order and the judge stayed implementation of the order pending resolution of the appeals. In light of the re-affirmed remedy ordered by the District Court, the Company was required to re-evaluate its reserve for this case. Due to the current economic environment of low interest rates that have a significant impact on the valuation of potential future pension benefits, the Company was required to increase its reserve for this matter in the fourth quarter of It is reasonably possible that others could initiate additional litigation or additional regulatory action against the Company with respect to use of data provided by Ingenix, Inc. The Company denies the allegations asserted in the investigations and litigation and will vigorously defend itself in these matters. Subsequent Event – Reinsurance of GMDB and GMIB Business NOTE 25 Effective February 4, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with Berkshire Hathaway Life Insurance Company of Nebraska (Berkshire) to reinsure the GMDB and GMIB businesses. Berkshire will reinsure 100% of the Company’s future claim payments, net of retrocessional arrangements in place prior to February 4, 2013, for a reinsurance premium of $2.2 billion. The reinsurance agreement is subject to an overall limit of approximately $3.8 billion plus future premiums collected under the contracts being reinsured that will be paid to Berkshire. The Company estimates that these future premium amounts will be from $0.1 to $0.3 billion and, accordingly, expects future claims of approximately $4 billion to be covered by the agreement. This reinsurance premium will be recorded in the first quarter of 2013 resulting in an after-tax impact to shareholders’ net income of approximately $500 million. Premium of $725 million was paid on February 4, 2013 with the remainder to be paid by April 30, 2013. This premium will ultimately be funded from the sale or internal transfer of investment assets that were supporting this book of business, as well as tax benefits related to the transaction, and cash. CIGNA CORPORATION -  2012 Form  10-K 125