3.3. Compliance with the minimum requirements of the Tender specifications 3.4. Award criteria  By submitting a tender a tenderer commits to perform the contract in full compliance with the  terms and conditions of the procurement documents for this call for tender. Particular  attention is drawn to the minimum requirements specified in Section 1.4 of these  specifications and to the fact that tenders must comply with applicable data protection,  environmental, social and labour law obligations established by Union law, national  legislation, collective agreements or the international environmental, social and labour  conventions listed in Annex X to Directive 2014/24/EU.  The minimum requirements shall be observed throughout the entire duration of the contract.  Compliance with these requirements is mandatory and cannot be subject to any assumptions,  limitations, conditions, or reservations on the part of a tenderer.  Tenders that are not compliant with the applicable minimum requirements shall be  rejected. The contract will be awarded to the most economically advantageous tender, according to the  'best price-quality ratio' award method. The quality of the tender will be evaluated based on  the following criteria. The maximum total quality score is 100 points.  A maximum of 60 points will be attributed to criterion 1, a maximum of 20 points will be  attributed to criterion 2, and a maximum of 20 points will be attributed to criterion 3. In  addition, a minimum threshold will be set up under this system of points:   - Technical sufficiency levels: Selected companies will have to score a minimum of 40, 10 and  10 points under criteria 1, 2 and 3 respectively, with a minimum total of 65 points .  Assessment of the tenders will focus on the quality of the proposed services therefore  tenderers should elaborate on all points addressed by these specifications in order to score as  many points as possible. The mere repetition of mandatory requirements set out in these  specifications, without going into details or without giving any added value, will only result in  a very low score. In addition, if certain essential points of these specifications are not  expressly covered by the tender, the Commission may decide to give a zero mark for the  relevant qualitative award criteria.  1  Quality of the proposed methodology  (60 points – minimum threshold 40 points)  The degree to which the methodology shows the capacity to analyse, review and  evaluate documents and figures, in accordance with the needs of the contracting  authority will be assessed under this criterion. Furthermore the tender must demonstrate  the capacity to resolve the questions underlying in the tender in a realistic and well- structured way, as well as demonstrate that the methods proposed are suited to the needs  set out by the Commission in the Technical Specifications (see section 1.4.2).  2  Organisation of the work and allocation of resources  (20 points – minimum  threshold 10)  This criterion will assess how the roles and responsibilities of the proposed team and  of the economic operators (in case of joint tenders, including subcontractors if  23