Rothkegel et al. 14 pronounced negative slope in the beginning). A difference in DTC was visible until about 600 ms after offset of the fixation marker. Later during the trial, the curves converged for all pre-trial conditions and reached a stable DTC for the rest of the trial. Qualitatively, we also observed a small initial difference in DTC between short pre-trial fixation times of 125 ms and 250 ms and pre-trial fixation times of 500 ms and 1000 ms. Distance to Center of the second fixation . As in Experiment 1, we found a strong influence of the latency of the first saccade on the DTC of the second fixation for small pre-trial fixation times (Fig. 3b). The results of the linear mixed model in Experiment 2 (Tab. 2) were similar to Experiment 1. The most important results are the significantly lower DTC of the 0 ms pre-trial fixation time compared to the average and the significant increase in DTC for higher saccade latencies. As in Experiment 1 an interaction between saccade latency and pre-trial fixation time is visible. This is especially true for the 0 ms condition, where the influence of saccade latency significantly increases compared to the average influence. In Experiment 2 the only significant decrease in saccade latency influence is visible for a pre-trial fixation time of 250 ms. The overall direction of the influence (increasing influence of saccade latency for pre-trial fixation times of 0 & 125 ms vs. decreasing influence for pre-trial fixation times of 250 & 500 ms) remains as in Experiment 1. If the starting position was close to the image center all pre-trial fixation times of 125 ms or longer (Fig. 3a) led to a reduction of the CFB on early fixations. After around 600 ms this influence disappeared. Furthermore, a clear relation between latency of the first saccade and the CFB of the second fixation was visible (Fig. 3b). Thus, the results Discussion