(ii) entering into agreement with other persons with the aim of distorting competition;  (iii) violating intellectual property rights;  (iv) attempting to influence the decision-making process of the contracting authority  during the award procedure;  (v) attempting to obtain confidential information that may confer upon it undue  advantages in the award procedure;  d) it has been established by a final judgement that the person is guilty of the following:  (i) fraud, within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 and Article 1 of the  Convention on the protection of the European Communities' financial interests, drawn up  by the Council Act of 26 July 1995;  (ii) corruption, as defined in Article 4(2) of Directive (EU) 2017/1371 and Article 3 of the  Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European  Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union, drawn up by the  Council Act of 26 May 1997, and conduct referred to in Article 2(1) of Council Framework  Decision 2003/568/JHA, as well as corruption as defined in the applicable law;  (iii) conduct related to a criminal organisation, as referred to in Article 2 of Council  Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA;  (iv) money laundering or terrorist financing, within the meaning of Article 1(3), (4) and (5)  of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council;  (v) terrorist-related offences or offences linked to terrorist activities, as defined in  Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA, respectively, or inciting,  aiding, abetting or attempting to commit such offences, as referred to in Article 4 of that  Decision;  (vi) child labour or other offences concerning trafficking in human beings as referred to in  Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council;  e) it has shown significant deficiencies in complying with the main obligations in the  performance of a contract or an agreement financed by the Union’s budget, which  has led to its early termination or to the application of liquidated damages or other  contractual penalties, or which has been discovered following checks, audits or  investigations by a contracting authority, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) or  the Court of Auditors;  f) it has been established by a final judgment or final administrative decision that the  person has committed an irregularity within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Council  Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95;  g) it has been established by a final judgment or final administrative decision that the  person has created an entity under a different jurisdiction with the intent to  circumvent fiscal, social or any other legal obligations in the jurisdiction of its  registered office, central administration or principal place of business. h) ( only for legal persons ) it has been established by a final judgment or final  administrative decision that the person has been created with the intent provided for  in point (g).  i) for the situations referred to in points (c) to (h) above the person is subject to:  i.facts established in the context of audits or investigations carried out by the  European Public Prosecutor's Office after its establishment, the Court of Auditors,  the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) or the internal auditor, or any other check,  Page 11 of 16 