Table of Contents Note 13 Share-Based Compensation Plans, Continued A summary of the status of our nonvested shares of our employee restricted stock as of February 1, 2020 is presented below:  Nonvested Restricted Shares Shares Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Nonvested at January 28, 2017 484,002 $68.27 Granted 356,224 32.00 Vested (125,190) 68.94 Withheld for federal taxes (50,957) 68.87 Forfeited (23,999) 55.90 Nonvested at February 3, 2018 640,080 48.37 Granted 352,060 40.90 Vested (177,394) 54.12 Withheld for federal taxes (69,762) 54.26 Forfeited (153,646) 42.66 Nonvested at February 2, 2019 591,338 42.99 Granted 269,816 42.48 Vested (138,765) 47.56 Withheld for federal taxes (55,598) 46.51 Forfeited (77,013) 42.19 Nonvested at February 1, 2020 589,778 $41.46 In September 2015, the EPA adopted an amendment to the Record of Decision eliminating the separate ground-water extraction and treatment systems and the use of in-situ oxidation from the remedy adopted in the Record of Decision. The amendment provides for the continued operation and maintenance of the existing wellhead treatment systems on wells operated by the Village of Garden City, New York (the "Village"). It also requires us to perform certain ongoing monitoring, operation and maintenance activities and to reimburse EPA's future oversight cost, involving future costs to us estimated to be between $1.7 million and $2.0 million, and to reimburse EPA for approximately $1.25 million of interim oversight costs. On August 15, 2016, the Court entered a Consent Judgment implementing the remedy provided for by the amendment. Note 14 Legal Proceedings and Other Matters Environmental Matters Genesco Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements As of February 1, 2020, we had $19.0 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements for restricted stock discussed above. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.79 years. New York State Environmental Matters In August 1997, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) and the Company entered into a consent order whereby we assumed responsibility for conducting a remedial investigation and feasibility study and implementing an interim remedial measure with regard to the site of a knitting mill operated by a former subsidiary of ours from 1965 to 1969. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), which assumed primary regulatory responsibility for the site from NYSDEC, issued a Record of Decision in September 2007. The Record of Decision specified a remedy of a combination of groundwater extraction and treatment and in-situ chemical oxidation. 74