5 and renormalization corrections to the level position and the coupling strength. Cotunneling processes leaving the dot state unchanged do not influence the exponential de- cay timescale leading to a fundamental difference with the RC -time extracted from the admittance. Acknowledgments.– The authors acknowledge fruit- ful discussion with H. Schoeller, S. E. Nigg and M. Moskalets. This work was supported by SPP 1285, EU STREP GEOMDISS, the Ministry of Innovation NRW, the Swiss NSF and MaNEP. 1 G. F`eve, A. Mah´e, J.-M. Berroir, T. Kontos, B. Pla¸cais, D. C. Glattli, A. Cavanna, B. Etienne, and Y. Jin, Science 316 , 1169 (2007). 2 M. D. Blumenthal, B. Kaestner, L. Li, S. Giblin, T. J. B. M. Janssen, M. Pepper, D. Anderson, G. Jones, and D. A. Ritchie , Nature Physics 3 , 343 (2007); J. Ebbecke, N. E. Fletcher, T. J. B. M. Janssen, F. J. Ahlers, M. Pepper, H. E. Beere, and D. A. Ritchie, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 , 4319 (2004); A. Fujiwara, N. M. Zimmerman, Y. Ono, and Y. Takahahsi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 , 1323 (2004). 3 M. B¨ uttiker, H. Thomas, A. Prˆetre, Phys. Lett. A 180 , 364 (1993). 4 J. Gabelli, G. F`eve, J.-M. Berroir, B. Pla¸cais, A. Cavanna, B. Etienne, Y. Jin, and D. C. Glattli, Science 313 , 499 (2006). 5 M. Moskalets, P. Samuelsson, and M. B¨ uttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 , 086601, (2008); J. Keeling, A. V. Shytov, and L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 , 196404 (2008). 6 S. E. Nigg, R. Lopez, and M. B¨ uttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 , 206804 (2006); Z. Ringel, Y. Imry, and O. Entin-Wohlman, Phys. Rev. B 78 , 165304 (2008). 7 J. Wang, B. Wang, and H. Guo, Phys. Rev. B 75 , 155336 (2007); S. E. Nigg and M. B¨ uttiker, Phys. Rev. B 77 , 085312 (2008). 8 Y. Hamamoto, T. Jonckheere, T. Kato, and T. Mar- tin. arXiv:0911.4101 (2009); C. Mora and K. Le Hur, arXiv:0911.4908 (2009). 9 J. M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L.H. Willems van Beveren, B. Witkamp, L.M.K. Vandersypen, and L.P. Kouwenhoven, Nature (London) 430 , 431 (2004); D. Heiss, M. Kroutvar, J. J. Finley, and G. Abstreiter, Solid State Commun. 135 , 591 (2005); S. Amasha, K. MacLean, Iuliana P. Radu, D. M. Zumb¨ uhl, M. A. Kastner, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 , 046803 (2008); M. Xiao, M. G. House, and H. W. Jiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 , 096801 (2010). 10 A. V. Khaetskii and Y. V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 61 , 12639 (2000); A. V. Khaetskii, D. Loss, and L. Glazman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 , 186802 (2002); V. I. Fal’ko, B. L. Altshuler, and O. Tsyplyatyev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 076603 (2005); J. Fischer, M. Trif, W.A. Coish, and D. Loss, Solid State Communications 149 , 1443 (2009). 11 A. B. Vorontsov and M. G. Vavilov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 , 226805 (2008). 12 L. I. Glazman and M. Pustilnik, in New directions in meso- scopic physics , eds. R. Fazio, V. F. Gantmakher, and Y. Imry, (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003) pp 93–115. 13 J. K¨ onig, H. Schoeller, and G. Sch¨ on, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 , 1715 (1996); J. K¨ onig, J. Schmid, H. Schoeller, and G. Sch¨ on, Phys. Rev. B 54 , 16820 (1996). 14 J. Splettstoesser, M. Governale, and J. K¨ onig, Phys. Rev. B 77 , 195320 (2008). 15 Renormalization corrections, that in our theory appear naturally, can not be found in a standard perturbation expansion, where they are usually introduced by hand at the end of the calculation. 16 J. Splettstoesser, M. Governale, J. K¨ onig, and R. Fazio, Phys. Rev. B 74 , 085305 (2006). 17 F. Cavaliere, M. Governale, and J. K¨ onig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 , 136801 (2009). 18 Assuming the circuit model of Fig. 1, the displacement cur- rent is proportional to the tunneling current 19 and there- fore has no influence on the RC time. 19 C. Bruder and H. Schoeller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 , 1076 (1994).