In Table VII we summarize the resulting constraints. For the purpose of a quantitative analysis we set g$_{s}$$_{∗}$ = 3, as obtained by matching to the 4D coupling at one-loop [76] (for the impact of a smaller RS volume see [85]). The constraints related to CPV correspond to maximal phases, and are subject to the requirement that the RS contributions are smaller than 30% (60%) of the SM contributions [9] in the B$_{d}$ ( K ) system. The analytical expressions in the table have roughly a 10% accuracy over the relevant range of parameters. Contributions from scalar exchange, either Higgs [81] or radion [86], are not included since these are more model dependent and known to be weaker [87] in the brane localized Higgs case. Constraints from ϵ $^{′}$/ϵ$_{K}$ have a different parameter dependence than the ϵ$_{K}$ constraints. Ex- plicitly, for β = 0, the ϵ $^{′}$/ϵ$_{K}$ constraint reads M min G = 1 . 2 y$_{5D}$ TeV. When combined with the ϵ constraint, we find M min G = 5 . 5 TeV with a corresponding y min 5D = 4 . 5 [74]. The constraints summarized in Table VII and the contributions to the neutron EDM which generically require M$_{KK}$ > O (20 TeV) [69] are a clear manifestation of the RS little CP problem. The problem can be amended by various alignment mechanisms [79, 80, 88]. In this case the bounds from the up sector, especially from CPV in the D system [16, 47], become important. Constraint from Δ F = 1 processes (in either the down sector [69, 84] or t → cZ [89]) are not included here, since they are weaker and, furthermore, these contributions can be suppressed (see [84]) due to incorporation of a custodial symmetry [90]. The new physics flavor puzzle is the question of why, and in what way, the flavor structure of TeV-scale new physics is non-generic. Indeed, the flavor predictions of most new physics models are not a consequence of their generic features but rather of the special structures that are imposed specifically to satisfy the existing severe flavor bounds. Therefore, flavor physics is a powerful indirect probe of new physics. We hope that new physics not far above the weak scale will be discovered at the LHC. A major issue will then be to understand its flavor structure. While it is not easy to directly probe this flavor structure at high energy, a lot can be learned from low energy flavor physics. The precision with which we can probe high scale physics in flavor physics experiments is often limited by theoretical uncertainties. Moreover, in case of theoretically clean observables, the sensitivity to the new-physics scale increases slowly with the statistics of the experiment. Thus, the important questions in view of future experiments are the following: 26 VII. FUTURE PROSPECTS