23 and analyzed in RHIC data[14]. observe when compared to the average charged par- ticles of the central Au Au collisions at √ s NN = 200 GeV[12, 14]. In Sec. VI D (Comparison to data): Triggered experimental angular correlations showing the ridge were presented at Quark Matter 2006[31]. Figure 7 shows the experimental Δ φ vs. Δ η CI correlation for 0-10% central Au Au collisions at √ s NN = 200; re- quiring one trigger particle p t between 3 to 4 GeV/c and an associated particle p t above 2.0 GeV/c. The yield is corrected for the finite Δ η pair acceptance. For the PBM generator, we then form a two charged particle correlation between one charged particle with a p t between 3.0 to 4.0 GeV/c and another charged particle whose p t is greater than 2.0 GeV/c. These are the same trigger conditions as in Ref.[31] which is shown in Fig. 11, that shows the corrected pair yield in the central data. Fig. 12 shows the correlation function generated by the PBM which does not depend on the number of events analyzed. The two figures were shown to be in reasonable agreement when compared as explained previously in Sec. VI D. In Fig. 13 we show the ridge signal predicted by the PBM for very similar data but with 0-5% centrality. Figure 14 shows the extraction of the jet signal. Explanations are given in the text. The second prediction is a development of a pre- dictive pionic measure of the strong CP Violation. The GFTM flux tubes are made up of longitudi- nal color electric and magnetic fields which gener- ate topological Chern-Simons charge[21] through the F ˜ F term that becomes a source of CP violation. The color electric field which points along the flux tube axis causes an up quark to be accelerated in one di- rection along the beam axis, while the anti-up quark is accelerated in the other direction. So when a pair of quarks and anti-quarks are formed they separate along the beam axis leading to a separated π + and π − pair along this axis. The color magnetic field which also points along the flux tube axis (which is parallel to the beam axis) causes an up quark to rotate around the flux tube axis in one direction, while the anti-up quark rotates in the other direc- tion. So when a pair of quarks and anti-quarks are formed they will pickup or lose transverse momen- tum. These changes in p t will be transmitted to the π + and π − pairs. The above pionic measures of strong CP viola- tion are used to form correlation functions based on four particles composed of two pairs which are opposite sign charge-particle-pairs that are paired and binned. These four particle correlations accu- mulate from bubble to bubble by particles that are pushed or pulled (by the color electric field) and rotated (by the color magnetic field) in a right or We show in Sec. VI that if we trigger on particles with 3 to 4 GeV/c and correlate this trigger parti- cle with an other charged particle of greater than 1.1 GeV/c, the PBM can produce a phenomenon very similar to the ridge[17, 23–30]. (See Figs. 6- 12). We then selected charged particles inside the ridge and predicted the correlation that one should Topic 1: The ridge is treated in Sec. VI. Topic 2: Strong CP violation (Chern-Simons topological charge) is treated in Sec. VII. With the connection of the PBM to the GFTM two new predictions become possible for our PBM. The first is related to the fact that the blast wave radial flow given to the flux tube depends on where the tube is initially in the transverse plane of the colliding Au Au system. The tube gets the same radial boost all along its longitudinal length. This means that there is correlated p t among the partons of the bubble. In this paper we consider predictions we can make in regard to interesting topics and com- parisons with relevant data which exist by utilizing the parton bubble model (PBM[6]), and its features related to the glasma flux tube model (GFTM)[17]). The bubbles represent a significant substructure of gluonic hot spots formed on the surface of a dense opaque fireball at kinetic freezeout. The origins of these hot spots come from a direct connection be- tween our Parton Bubble Model (PBM[6]) and the Glasma Flux Tube Model (GFTM)[17]). In the GFTM a flux tube is formed right after the initial collision of the Au Au system. This flux tube ex- tends over many units of pseudorapidity (Δ η ). A blast wave gives the tubes near the surface trans- verse flow in the same way it gave flow to the bubbles in the PBM. This means the transverse momentum ( p t ) distribution of the flux tube is directly trans- lated to the p t spectrum. In the PBM this flux tube is approximated by a sum of partons which are dis- tributed over this same large Δ η region. Initially the transverse space is filled with flux tubes of large longitudinal extent but small transverse size ∼ Q $_{−}$1 s . The flux tubes that are near the surface of the fire- ball get the largest radial flow and are emitted from the surface. As in the parton bubble model these partons shower and the higher p t particles escape the surface and do not interact. Q s is around 1 GeV/c thus the size of the flux tube is about 1/4 fm initially. The flux tubes near the surface are ini- tially at a radius ∼ 5 fm. The φ angle wedge of the flux tube ∼ 1/20 radians or ∼ 3 ◦ . In Sec. V (also see Sec. IV) we connect the GFTM to the PBM: by as- suming the bubbles are the final state of a flux tube at kinetic freezeout, and discussing evidence for this connection which is further developed in Sec. VI and Sec. VII.