0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 mu FDR 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 mu FDR 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 mu Power Figure 4: Power as a function of µ$_{1}$ for Procedure 4.1 with parameters w$_{1}$ = 0 . 5 , q$_{1}$ = 0 . 025 , q = 0 . 05 for the following selection rules: BH at level 0 . 0125 (solid black curve); selection of the hypotheses with k smallest primary study p -values, where k = 25 (dashed green curve), k = 75 (dashed red curve), k ∈ { 30 , 35 , . . . , 100 } (dashed grey curves). The remaining parameters were: f$_{00}$ = 0 . 9 , f$_{01}$ = f$_{10}$ = 0 . 025 , f$_{11}$ = 0 . 05 , σ$_{1}$ = 0 . 5 , σ$_{2}$ = 1 , µ$_{2}$ = 3. Figure 3: FDR versus µ = µ$_{1}$ = µ$_{2}$ for f$_{01}$ = f$_{10}$ = 0 . 5 (left) and f$_{00}$ = 0 . 8 , f$_{01}$ = f$_{10}$ = 0 . 1 (right), for the following procedures at level q = 0 . 05: BH-1, BH-2 (solid with circles); BH-2, BH-1 (dashed with circles); Procedure 4.1 with q$_{1}$ = 0 . 025 and w$_{1}$ of 1 (solid), 0.5 (dotted), or 0 (dashed). The standard deviations were σ$_{1}$ = 0 . 3 and σ$_{2}$ = 1. 24