Table VII. (Continued.) IV. SCREENED QED CORRECTIONS 22 The screened QED contribution Δ E$_{scrQED}$ incorporates the screened SE Δ E$_{scrSE}$ and screened VP Δ E$_{scrVP}$ corrections. As concerns the QED part of the two-photon exchange correction, it is included in the electronic-structure contribution (see the previous section). Therefore, here we restrict ourself with the contributions of the screened SE and VP terms into the 2 p$_{j}$ − 2 s transition energies of Li-like ions. First estimates of the screened QED corrections in Li-like ions were performed in Refs. [1– 3, 49, 50], where these corrections were included either phenomenologically or partly. The rigorous evaluations of the screened SE and VP corrections were first performed in works [4, 57] and [5], respectively. These calculations incorporate the second-order QED effects starting with the pure Coulomb potential as the zeroth-order approximation (the original Furry picture). Later, in case of Li-like bismuth, these corrections were calculated starting with a local screening potential (the extended Furry picture) [9]. In the present paper the screened SE and VP corrections are evaluated within the ex- tended Furry representation for the ionization energies of the 2 s , 2 p$_{1}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ , and 2 p$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ states of ∗ Corrected for the nuclear deformation effect and the rms value from Ref. [16]. Z 〈 r $^{2}$〉1 / 2 Transition Dirac 1ph 2ph ⩾ 3ph Total Total Ref. [13] 70 5.311 2 p$_{1}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s -2.91444 202.61211 -7.64776 0.0544 192.104(2)(10) 192.1023(38) 70 5.311 2 p$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s 1299.24227 62.72945 -2.38263 -0.0242 1359.565(2)(10) 1359.5629(52) 80 5.463 2 p$_{1}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s -8.57680 264.30462 -9.68045 0.0837 246.131(4)(13) 246.130(6) 80 5.463 2 p$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s 2359.15998 36.01281 -1.82616 -0.0279 2393.319(4)(13) 2393.317(8) 83 5.521 2 p$_{1}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s -11.89801 286.67896 -10.44836 0.0970 264.430(5)(15) 264.427(7) 83 5.521 2 p$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s 2792.20782 23.81784 -1.60493 -0.0290 2814.391(5)(15) 2814.392(9) 90 5.710 2 p$_{1}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s -26.00449 348.27283 -12.62608 0.1270 309.769(6)(40) 309.780(10) 90 5.710 2 p$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s 4077.38297 -14.49611 -0.95621 -0.0350 4061.896(6)(40) 4061.908(11) 92 5.857 2 p$_{1}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s -33.304 368.83426 -13.37086 0.1370 322.296(7)(50) 322.292(11) ∗ 92 5.857 2 p$_{3}$$_{/}$$_{2}$ − 2 s 4527.933 -28.41302 -0.72818 -0.0390 4498.753(7)(50) 4498.750(12) ∗