2_SRMGSA_202003  Originally published March 2020  Uncontrolled copy when downloaded  6 3. The first-site IOC occurs when operational capability is declared ready for conditional or limited use by site personnel. This declaration is after the capability is successfully installed and checked out at the site and site acceptance testing and field familiarization is completed. The IOC requires satisfaction of operational requirements as well as full logistics support and training for technicians and air traffic specialists to be in place. The IOC marks the start of an operational suitability demonstration during which solution performance is evaluated under intense scrutiny to achieve full operational readiness. Additional specific criteria for achieving the IOC are defined in the acquisition program baseline. 2.3.4.1.4  Final Business Case  2.3.4.1.5  Final ISPD  2.3.4.1.6  Initial TEMP  2.3.4.1.7  PMP  2.3.4.1.8  PIR Strategy  2.3.5 Achieving an ISD  options, and contingencies may be recognized to reorganize solution development into phases.  Actual residual risk may be higher or lower depending on the sum total of all outside influences  and developments in NAS operations during the years it takes to field the new system.  In the Final IA phase, the Final Business Case thoroughly analyzes the alternative selected at  the IID including procurement alternatives. An FID requires a final ISPD. The PO must update the ISPD as necessary before the FID. After the FID, the ISPD may only be modified if the program returns to the JRC to rebaseline the  investment decision. Rebaselining is discouraged; therefore, the ISPD must provide high  confidence, comprehensive, and contingent plans that fit within the approved baseline. Final,  signed approval of the ISPD by all members of the JRC is concurrent with the investment  decision.  The initial TEMP is required for the FID and must be approved by the PO prior to the decision  point. The initial TEMP is not expected to contain the complete level of detail required to fully  implement the T&E program; however, it must contain estimates of the testing scope that are  sufficient to address ISPD requirements and development of T&E requirements for any proposal  requests. The PO must update the PMP as necessary before the FID.  A  PIR is an evaluation tool used to assess the results of an investment program against  baseline expectations 6 to 24 months after the program goes into operational service. The  PIR’s main objective is to assess an investment program, determining whether the program is  achieving expected performance and benefit targets, meeting the service needs of customers,  and upholding the validity of the original Business Case. The PIR process is governed by AMS  Section 4.15.1,  Post-Implementation Review .  The PIR Team must develop a PIR Strategy during the Final IA phase. The strategy identifies  sites at which the review will be conducted, when the review is expected to occur, any  limitations to the review, products of the review, and participating organizations and their  responsibilities. All investment programs are potentially reviewed based on their assigned  acquisition category. The AJI Safety Case Lead (SCL), PIR Quality Officer, and PO should  discuss SMS considerations for inclusion in the PIR Strategy during an SSM. At the end of the SI phase, the PO must obtain an ISD that authorizes deployment of a solution  into the operational environment and occurs after demonstration of the IOC 3  at the key site.