[48] Wagner, G. P., Pavlicev, M., and Cheverud, J. M. (2007) The road to modularity. Nature reviews. Genetics , 8 , 921–931. [49] Wang, X. R., Lizier, J., and Prokopenko, M. (2010) A Fisher information study of phase transitions in random Boolean networks. Fellermann, H., D¨ orr, M., Hanczyc, M. M., Laursen, L. L., Maurer, S., Merkle, D., Monnard, P.-A., Støy, K., and Rasmussen, S. (eds.), Artificial Life XII Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems , pp. 305–312, MIT Press. [50] Watson, R. A. (2006) Compositional Evolution: The Impact of Sex, Symbiosis, and Modularity on the Gradualist Framework of Evolution . MIT Press. [51] Whitacre, J. M. and Bender, A. (2010) Degeneracy: a design principle for robustness and evolvability. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 263 , 143–153. [52] Wolfram, S. (1986) Theory and Application of Cellular Automata . World Scientific. [53] Wuensche, A. (1998) Discrete dynamical networks and their attractor basins. Standish, R., Henry, B., Watt, S., Marks, R., Stocker, R., Green, D., Keen, S., and Bossomaier, T. (eds.), Complex Systems ’98 , University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, pp. 3–21. A Tables N K=L M T K$_{T}$ A Le %SIA µ κ σA σLe σ % SIA 5 0.83333 4 20 1 4.03 2 0.0009 1.25 0.83333 5.722 1.435 0.0019 5 1.66666 4 40 2 12.65 4 0.0051 1.25 0.83333 16.073 3.619 0.0083 5 2.5 4 60 3 18.06 7 0.0106 1.25 0.83333 18.618 6.140 0.0122 5 3.33333 4 80 4 14.10 13 0.0125 1.25 0.83333 14.789 13.468 0.0129 Table A.1: Statistical results for case 1: K = L , µ → 1. 31