2. Differences with International Accounting Standards Noncurrent monetary items denominated in foreign currencies Cumulative translation adjustments Decrease in cumulative translation adjustments Marketable Securities (Note 4) Inventories Leases (Note 15) Detachable stock purchase warrants (Note 9) Scope of consolidation Pension and Severance plans (Note 10) The differences between the accounting principles and practices adopted by the Group and those prescribed by  International Accounting Standards (“IAS”) are summarized as follows. Had noncurrent monetary items denominated in foreign currencies been translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates pursuant to IAS No. 21, the differences would not have been significant. Although IAS No. 21 requires that cumulative translation adjustments be reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, the Group has reported this under assets.  Under IAS No. 21, upon the liquidation of a foreign subsidiary, the amount of the cumulative translation adjustments related to the foreign subsidiary should be recognized as income or expenses. The Group records this amount directly in retained earnings. Although IAS No. 25 requires that marketable securities recorded in investments and long-term loans be stated at the lower of cost or market on a portfolio basis, the Company determines the value of the marketable securities on an item-by-item basis in order to state their value of the securities more conservatively. The difference between this method and IAS was immaterial. IAS No. 2 requires that inventories be valued at the lower of their historical cost or net realizable value. Had IAS  No. 2 been applied, the difference in the aggregate value of the inventories would not have been significant. Under IAS No. 32, detachable stock purchase warrants should be recorded as a component of shareholders’ equity. The Group includes warrants in other current liabilities. Before the year ended March 31, 1999, the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries in Japan treated finance leases in the same way as operating leases under accounting principles generally accepted in Japan, which differ from IAS No.17. For the year ended March 31, 2000, there is no difference from IAS No. 17, since the Group changed its method of accounting for finance leases from accounting such leases in the same manner as operating leases to recording lease receivables and capitalizing them as lease assets. Fujitsu Leasing Co., Ltd. was excluded from consolidation in the year ended March 31, 1999 in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Japan, and this represents a deviation from the scope of consolidation prescribed under IAS No. 27. For the year ended March 31, 2000, there was no difference from IAS No. 27, since Fujitsu Leasing Co., Ltd. was initially consolidated. Accounting standards in Japan for retirement benefits adopted effective April 1, 2000, are analogous to the revised IAS No. 19, except for the period for amortizing the unrecognized net obligation upon the application of the new accounting standards. These standards require that severance benefits and pension liabilities and costs be stated by the projected unit credit method. The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries in Japan, as of April 1, 2000, initially estimated the unrecognized net obligation upon application of the new accounting standards, as set forth in Note 10. The unrecognized net obligation assuming that they had followed the new accounting standards for the year ended March 31, 2000 was not computed. The estimate of this amount was not readily determinable, because the pension plans were under reformation. 31