24 If we are lucky and the predicted color magnetic ef- fects can be confirmed experimentally we would have strong evidence for the following: 1) CP is violated in the strong interaction in isolated local space time regions where topological charge[21] is generated. 2) The glasma flux tube model (GFTM) which was evolved from the color glass condensate (CGC) would be found to be consistent with a very signifi- cant experimental check. 3) The parton bubble model event generator (PBM) is clearly closely connected to the GFTM. The bubble substructure strongly supported by the PBM is likely due to the final state of the flux tube at kinetic freezeout. IX. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS left handed direction. The longitudinal color electric field predicts aligned pairs in a pseudorapidity or Δ η measure. The longitudinal color magnetic field pre- dicts anti-aligned pairs in a transverse momentum or Δ P t measure. The observations of these corre- lations would be a strong confirmation of this the- ory. The much larger unlike-sign pairs than like-sign pairs in the PBM and the data; and the strong dip of the CI correlation at small Δ η (see Fig. 4 and Sec. VII C for full details) shows very strong evidence supporting the color electric alignment prediction in the √ s NN = 200 GeV central Au Au collision data analyses at RHIC[6, 12]. This highly significant dip ( ∼ 14 σ ) means that like-sign pairs are removed as one approaches the region Δ η = Δ φ = 0.0. Thus this is very strong evidence for the predicted effect of the color electric field. The color magnetic anti- aligned pairs in the transverse momentum predic- tion, treated in Sec. VII D as of now has not been observed or looked for. However our predicted spe- cific four charged particle correlations can be used to search for experimental evidence for the color mag- netic fields. Our success in demonstrating strong experimental evidence for the expected color electric field effects from previously published data suggests that the unique detailed correlations we have presented for searching for evidence for the predicted color mag- netic field effects should be urgently investigated. This research was supported by the U.S. Depart- ment of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 98CH10886. The author thank William Love for valuable discussion and assistance in production of figures. Finally this manuscript is in memory of my fellow collaborator Prof. Sam Lindenbaum which help form many of the ideas of bubbles in heavy ion collisions. [1] L. Van Hove, Z. Phys. C 27, 135 (1985). [2] S.J. Lindenbaum, R.S. Longacre, J. Phys. G 26, 937 (2000). [3] D. Kharzeev, R.D. Pisarski, Phys. Rev. D 61, 111901 (2000). [4] C. Adler et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 082301 (2001). [5] S.J. Lindenbaum, R.S. Longacre M. Kramer, Eur. Phys. J. C. 30, 241 (2003). [6] S.J. Lindenbaum, R.S. Longacre, Eur. Phys. J. C. 49, 767-782 (2007). [7] J. Adams et al. , Phys. Rev. C. 71, 044906 (2005), S.S. Adler et al. , Phys Rev. Lett. 93, 152302 (2004). [8] X.N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3501 (1991). [9] K. Adcox et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 022301 (2001). [10] Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499,(2003), C. Adler et al., 433-436, K.H. Ackermann et al.(STAR Col- laboration), 624-632, M. Anderson et al., 659-678, F.S. Bieser et al., 766-777. [11] T. Sjostrand, M. van Zijil, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2019 (1987). [12] J. Adams et al. , Phys. Rev. C 75, 034901 (2007). [13] S.J. Lindenbaum and R.S. Longacre, Phys. Rev. C 78, 054904 (2008). [14] B.I. Abelev et al. , arXiv:0806.0513[nucl-ex]. [15] J. Adams et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 172302 (2003). [31] J. Putschke, J. Phys. G Phys. 34, S679 (2007). [16] A. Adare et al. , Rev. Lett. 101, 232301 (2008). [17] A. Dumitru, F. Gelis, L. McLerran and R. Venu- gopalan, Nucl. Phys. A 810, 91 (2008). [18] L. McLerran and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2233 (1994); Phys. Rev. D 49, 3352 (1994); Phys. Rev. D 50, 2225 (1994). [19] T. Lappi and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A 772, 200 (2006). [20] F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan, Acta Phys. Polon. B 37, 3253 (2006). [21] D. Kharzeev, A. Krasnitz and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Lett. B 545, 298 (2002). [22] S. Gavin, L. McLerran and G. Moschelli, Eur. Phys. J. C. 62, 277-280 (2009). [23] N. Armesto, C. Salgado, U.A. Wiedemann, Phys Rev. Lett. 93, 242301 (2004). [24] P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. C. 75, 014901 (2007). [25] E. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. C. 76, 047901 (2007). [26] A. Dumitru, Y. Nara, B. Schenke, M. Strickland, Phys. Rev. C 78, 024909 (2008). [27] V.S. Pantuev, arXiv:0710.1882[hep-ph]. [28] R. Mizukawa, T. Hirano, M. Isse, Y. Nara, A. Ohnishi, J. Phys. G 35, 104083 (2008). [29] C.Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. C. 78, 064905 (2008).. [30] R.C. Hwa, arXiv:0708.1508[nucl-th].