Therefore we can choose θ ∈ (0 , 1) such that for all y$_{0}$ ∈ R m satisfying | y$_{0}$ | < L − L ρ − ϵ. By ‖ ∂$_{t}$u ‖ H $^{2}$( D ×{| y | < 2 L }× ( − T,T )) ≤ M, the trace theorem yields d ≤ CM, which implies d ≤ Cd $^{θ}$. Varying y$_{0}$ and noting we obtain Thus the proof of Theorem 1 is completed. REFERENCES ∫ D × { y ; | y − y$_{0}$ | < L ρ } | f | $^{2}$dxdy ≤ C ( d 2 θ + d 2 ) ⋃ { y ∈ R $^{m}$; | y − y$_{0}$ | ≤ L ρ , | y$_{0}$ | < L − L ρ − ε } = { y ∈ R $^{m}$; | y | < L − ϵ } , ∫ D ×{ y ; | y | <L − ϵ } | f ( x, y ) | $^{2}$dxdy ≤ Cd 2 $^{θ}$. [1] Ablowitz, M. J., and Haberman, R. (1975). Nonlinear evolution equations in two and three dimensions. Physical Review Letters, 35(18), 1185. [2] Amirov, A. K. (2001). Integral Geometry and Inverse Problems for Kinetic Equations. VSP, Utrecht The Netherlands, 201 pp. [3] Baudouin, L., and Puel, J. P. (2002). Uniqueness and stability in an inverse problem for the Schr¨ odinger equation. Inverse problems, 18(6), 1537. [4] Bellassoued, M., and Choulli, M. (2009). Logarithmic stability in the dynam- ical inverse problem for the Schr¨ odinger equation by arbitrary boundary ob- servation. Journal de mathematiques pures et appliquees, 91(3), 233-255. [5] Bellassoued, M., and Yamamoto, M. (2006). Logarithmic stability in determi- nation of a coefficient in an acoustic equation by arbitrary boundary observa- tion. Journal de math´ematiques pures et appliqu´ees, 85(2), 193-224. [6] Bukhgeim, A. L., and Klibanov, M. V. (1981). Global uniqueness of a class of inverse problems. In Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 260(2), 269-272. 31