Identifiability and estimation methods in this paper are applicable to the more general settings and, therefore, could be useful for developing such model checking methods. References [1] E.S. Allman, C. Matias, and J.A. Rhodes. Identifiablity of parameters in latent structure models with many observed variables. The Annals of Statistics , 37(6A):3099–3132, 2009. [2] American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition . Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994. [3] Y. Chen, J. Liu, G. Xu, and Z. Ying. Statistical analysis of Q-matrix based diagnostic classi- fication models. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 110(510):850–866, 2015. [4] Y. Chen, J. Liu, and Z. Ying. Online item calibration for Q-matrix in CD-CAT. Applied Psychological Measurement , 39(1):5–15, 2015. [5] C.Y. Chiu, J.A. Douglas, and X. Li. Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications. Psychometrika , 74(4):633–665, 2009. [6] J. de la Torre. The generalized dina model framework. Psychometrika , 76:179–199, 2011. [7] J. de la Torre and J.A. Douglas. Higher order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika , 69:333–353, 2004. [8] L.V. DiBello, W.F. Stout, and L. Roussos. Unified cognitive psychometric assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum , pages 361–390, 1995. [9] D.B. Dunson and C. Xing. Nonparametric bayes modeling of multivariate categorical data. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 104(487):1042–1051, 2009. 31