PART II  NOTE 11 Income Taxes the SFS to the National Remedy Review Board (NRRB). Th  e NRRB  has endorsed the selection of this alternative, and the EPA has drafted a  proposed plan recommending this remedy. As a result of this event, we  adjusted our estimated liability for clean up at this site. Additionally, we  continue to conduct work pursuant to CERCLA unilateral administrative  orders to address the potential for air emissions from beneath the cap  of several of the closed RCRA ponds. The amount of the reserve for  this site was $71.0 million and $46.1 million at December 31, 2010  and 2009, respectively. Although potential environmental remediation expenditures in excess  of the reserves and estimated loss contingencies could be signifi cant,  the impact on our future consolidated financial results is not subject to  reasonable estimation due to numerous uncertainties concerning the  nature and scope of possible contamination at many sites, identifi cation  of remediation alternatives under constantly changing requirements,  selection of new and diverse clean-up technologies to meet compliance  standards, the timing of potential expenditures and the allocation of  costs among PRPs as well as other third parties. The liabilities arising from potential environmental obligations that have  not been reserved for at this time may be material to any one quarter or  year’s results of operations in the future. However, we believe any such  liability arising from potential environmental obligations is not likely  to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity or fi nancial condition  and may be satisfied over the next 20 years or longer. Regarding current operating sites, we spent $8.4 million, $11.6 million  and $16.4 million for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, on  capital projects relating to environmental control facilities. Additionally,  in 2010, 2009 and 2008, we spent $25.9 million, $24.9 million and  $26.4 million, respectively, for environmental compliance costs, which  are operating costs not covered by established reserves. At our facility in Middleport, New York, we have constructed an  engineered cover, closed the RCRA regulated surface water impoundments  and are collecting and treating both surface water runoff and ground  water. A draft corrective measures study (CMS) has been prepared for  two off-site areas and is under review by the EPA and New York State  Departments of the Environment and Health (collectively referred to  as the Agencies). This draft CMS was submitted in the second quarter  of 2010. As a result of the CMS submission, we adjusted our estimated  liability for clean up at this site. In the third quarter of 2010, we received  comments on the draft CMS from the Agencies. We are in the process  of reviewing the comments and are in discussions with the Agencies  regarding revisions to the draft CMS. Additional costs may result, in  the event additional remediation is required by the Agencies during the  review and approval of the current CMS. The amount of the reserve  for this site is $46.2 million and $27.9 million at December 31, 2010  and 2009, respectively. Domestic and foreign components of income from continuing operations before income taxes are shown below: 52 FMC CORPORATION    2010 Form 10K (in Millions) Year Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 Domestic $303.2 $275.9 $331.8 Foreign 47.3 34.1 140.1 TOTAL $350.5 $310.0 $471.9 The provision (benefit) for income taxes attributable to income from continuing operations consisted of: (in Millions) Year Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008 Current: Federal $73.4 $ — $(1.2) Foreign 26.0 3.1 29.7 State 0.5 — — Total current 99.9 3.1 28.5 Deferred: Federal 20.2 44.6 91.9 Foreign 4.3 — — State 7.6 5.3 5.0 Total deferred 32.1 49.9 96.9 TOTAL $132.0 $53.0 $125.4 NOTE 11 Income  Taxes Middleport Other