Radaelli, and S-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 177402 (2004) 6. M. Kenzelmann, A. B. Harris, A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, T. Yildirim, Q. Huang, S. Park, G. Lawes, C. Broholm, N. Rogado, R. J. Cava, K. H. Kim, G. Jorge, and A. P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. B74 , 014429 (2006). 7. Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, T. Goto1, M. Matsuura, K. Hirota, T. Arima and Y. Tokura, arXiv:cond-matt/0701430v1 (2007). 8. M. Kenzelmann, G. Lawes, A.B. Harris, G. Gasparovic, C. Broholm, A.P. Ramirez, G.A. Jorge, M. Jaime, S. Park, Q. Huang, A.Ya. Shapiro, and L.A. Demianets, arXiv:cond-matt/0701426 (2007). 9. M. Kenzelmann, A. B. Harris, S. Jonas, C. Broholm, J. Schefer, S. B. Kim, C. L. Zhang, S.-W. Cheong, O. P. Vajk, and J.W. Lynn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 087206 (2005). 10. Maxim Mostovoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 067601(2005). 11. I. E. Chupis, arXiv:cond-matt/0702636 (2007). 12. Ivan A. Sergienko and E. Dagotto, Phys. Rev. 73, 094434 (2006). 13. Ivan A. Sergienko, Cengiz Sen, and Elbio Dagotto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 227204 (2006). 14. E. R. S´ anchez Guajardo, arXiv:cond-matt/0608300v1 (2006). 15. Seongsu Lee, A. Pirogov, Jung Hoon Han, J.-G. Park, A. Hoshikawa, and T. Kamiyama, Phys. Rev. 71, 180413 (2005). 16. Hosho Katsura, Naoto Nagaosa and Aleander V. Balatsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 057205 (2005). 17. Though the use of spin current may raise the issue of whether it is well- defined in the presence of spin-orbit interaction, we nevertheless still use this term as no ambiguity involved here. 18. I. Dzyaloshinskii, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4 , 241 (1958). 19. T. Moriya, Phys. Rev. 120 , 91 (1960). 20