15 tems sizes, the present study open the possibility of: sim- ilar studies for higher level Hall sequences that support universal quantum computation; direct implementation and verification of the quantum gates found in Ref. 17 and a direct simulation of a quantum algorithm, includ- ing the read in, braiding and read out phases. Acknowledgment EP and DH both acknowledge sup- port from the U. S. National Science Foundation (un- der MRSEC Grant No. DMR-0819860 and MRSEC grant/DMR-0213706) at the Princeton Center for Com- plexMaterials. EP also wants to acknowledge support from the Research Corporation and from the office of the Provost of Yeshiva University. non-Abelian parts of the adiabatic curvature for the case of one itinerant anyon and three anyons fixed at the equa- tor, in the most possible spread configuration. The map- ping reveals that the non-Abelian curvature is strongly localized near the fixed quasiholes. We introduced the Twist density, which measures twisting of the zero modes during the adiabatic braiding. We found that the Twist density is practically zero near the fixed anyons, fact that signaled a splitting of the zero modes in two non-mixing sectors. Further analysis showed that this splitting is precisely the one implied by the fussion rules of the un- derlying CFT structure of the Moore-Read sequence. If the computations can be implemented to larger sys- 16 N. Bonesteel, L. Hormozi, and G. Zikos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 140503 (2005). 17 L. Hormozi, G. Zikos, and N. Bonesteel, Phys. Rev. B 75 , 165310 (2007). 18 J. Slingerland and F. Bais, Nucl. Phys. B 612 , 229 (2001). 19 C. Nayak and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B 479 , 529 (1996). 20 N. Read, in APS March Meeting (2007). 21 Y. Tserkovnyak and S. Simon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 , 016802 (2003). 22 R. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 , 1395 (1983). ∗ Electronic address: prodan@yu.edu 1 R. Willett, J. Eisenstein, H. Stormer, D. Tsui, A. Gossard, and J. English, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 , 1776 (1987). 2 J. Xia, W. Pan, C. Vincente, E. Adams, N. Sullivan, H. Stormer, D. Tsui, L. Pfeiffer, K. Baldwin, and K. West, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 176809 (2004). 3 E. Rezayi and N. Read, cond-mat/0608346 (2006). 4 G. Moore and N. Read, Nucl. Phys. B 360 , 362 (1991). 5 N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 59 , 8084 (1999). 6 C. de C. Chamon, S. K. D.E. Freed, S. Sondhi, and X. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 55 , 2331 (1997). 7 S. Isakov, T. Martin, and S. Ouvry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 , 580 (1999). 9 S. Vishveshwara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 196803 (2003). 23 N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 54 , 16864 (1996). 24 T. Hui and F. Haldane, unpublished. 25 S. Simon, E. Rezayi, and N. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B 75 , 075318 (2007). 26 F. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 , 605 (1983). 27 G. Nenciu, Comm. Math. Phys. 82 , 121 (1981). 28 J. Avron, R. Seiler, and L. Yaffe, Comm. Math. Phys. 110 , 33 (1987). 10 C. Kane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 , 226802 (2003). 11 E. Kim, M. Lawler, S. Vishveshwara, and E. Fradkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 176402 (2005). 8 I. Safi, P. Devillard, and T. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 4628 (2001). 12 K. Law, D. Feldman, and Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. B 74 , 045319 (2006). 13 P. Bonderson, A. Kitaev, and K. Shtengel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 016803 (2006). 14 D. Feldman and A. Kitaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 , 186803 (2006). 29 G. Nenciu, Comm. Math. Phys. 152 , 479 (1993). 30 F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 , 2111 (1984). 31 N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 56 , 12847 (1997). 32 D. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 268 (2001). 33 D. Diakonov and V. Petrov, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 92 , 905 (2001). 34 M. Faber, A. Ivanov, N. Troitskaya, and M. Zach, Phys. Rev. D 62 , 025019 (2000). 15 A. Kitaev, A. Shen, and M. Vyalyi, Classical and Quan- tum Computation (Americal Mathematical Society, Prov- idence, 1999).