0.01 0.1 1 10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 b ) q  = 30 q  = 10 q  = 5 <  S  > /  A e a ) q  = 10 q  = 30 q  = 5 < S  > /  A FIG. 3: Final absorbing state in the Axelrod model with social influence as function of the Mass Media strength ϵ for different values of q . a) Calculation done including one-step neighbors (von Neumann neighborhood). b) Calculation done including two-step neighbors. The parameters used for these calculations are the same as in Fig. 2. include the bigger culture and also agents which belong to smaller culture sizes. Figure 3 shows a second computational experiment. Here, we have included the values of the same parameter < S > /A , but now as a function of the super-agent strength ϵ for three different values of q . In this case, noise has also been neglected. One and two- steps neighborhoods are included in panels a) and b) respectively. For the three values of q shown, a monoculture is strongly induced as ϵ increases due to the constant presence of the super-agent on the set of influence. The order of the curves according to the value of q is in correspondence with the order of the curves in Fig. 2 and the values of ϵ . As ϵ increases the super-agent becomes a factor of “normalization” making constant its own values in time along the dynamical evolution of the system. Even for q = 10, when the set 12