Rothkegel et al. 16 in the first experiment we used the same extreme starting positions as in Experiment 1. Participants . We recorded eye movements from 24 participants for Experiment 3 (20 female; 20–29 years old) Procedure . In Experiment 3, participants experienced pre-trial fixation times between 0 and 125 ms in steps of 25 ms (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 ms). Each of the six pre- trial fixation times was presented in a block of 20 images, pseudo-randomized across participants. In total participants viewed 120 images. Note, the experiment was tested with a different setup (monitor, eye-tracker, etc.; see general methods section for details). Thus, the absolute value of DTC is not directly comparable between Experiment 3 and the remaining experiments. Distance to Center over Time . As in Experiment 1 and 2 the eyes initially moved towards the center for all pre-trial fixation times (Fig. 4a). The difference between pre-trial con- ditions was not as clearly visible as in previous experiments. Even the difference between the 0 and the 125 ms condition was relatively small. The smaller difference was probably due to the blocked design where pre-trial fixation times changed after 20 trials during the experiment for each participant. Nonetheless, curves with a pre-trial fixation time smaller than or equal to 50 ms had smaller minima than the ones with pre-trial fixation times larger than 50 ms (see inset in Fig. 4a). Distance to Center of the second fixation . The influence of the first saccade latency on the distance to center of the second fixation is clearly visible in Figure 4b. The influence Results Methods