•  On April 5, 2012, a putative class action under RESP A titled Riddle v. Bank of America Corporation, et al. was  filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On January 4, 2013, Radian Guaranty  moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims as barred by the statute of limitations.  •  On April 5, 2012, a putative class action under RESP A titled Manners, et al. v. Fifth Third Bank, et al. was filed  in the U.S. District Court for the  Western District of Pennsylvania. On September 28, 2012, plaintif fs filed an  amended complaint adding three borrowers whose loans were insured by Radian Guaranty . On November 28,  2012, Radian Guaranty moved to dismiss plaintif fs’ claims as barred by the statute of limitations, and on January  28, 2013, plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss. •  On April 19, 2012, a putative class action under RESP A titled Rulison v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc., et  al. was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New  York. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed  this lawsuit on July 3, 2012. •  On May 18, 2012, a putative class action under RESP A titled Hill, et al. v. Flagstar Bank FSB, et al. was filed in  the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In this case, Radian Guaranty has insured the  loan of one of the plaintif fs. On January 28, 2013, plaintif fs filed an amended complaint. Radian Guaranty  intends to file a motion to dismiss the complaint. •  On May 31, 2012, a putative class action under RESP A titled Barlee, et al. v. First Horizon National Corporation,  et al. was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On October 9, 2012, plaintif fs  filed an amended complaint, and on November 5, 2012, Radian Guaranty filed a motion to dismiss the amended  complaint for lack of standing because it did not insure any of the plaintif fs’ loans. Plaintiffs have filed an  opposition to the motion to dismiss, and on January 16, 2013, Radian Guaranty filed a reply in further support of  its motion to dismiss. •  On June 28, 2012, a putative class action under RESP A titled Cunningham, et al. v. M&T Bank Corporation, et  al. was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. On October 9, 2012, plaintif fs  filed an amended complaint in which they added one borrower whose loan was insured by Radian Guaranty . On  December 10, 2012, Radian Guaranty moved to dismiss plaintif fs’ claims as barred by the statute of limitations,  and on February 11, 2013, plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss. •  On January 4, 2013, a putative class action under RESP A titled Ba, et al. v. HSBC USA, Inc., et al., was filed in  the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Radian Guaranty intends to move to dismiss this  lawsuit for lack of standing because it did not insure any of the plaintif fs’ loans.  •  On January 13, 2012, a putative class action under RESP A titled Menichino, et al. v. Citibank, N.A., et al., was  filed in the U.S. District Court for the  Western District of Pennsylvania. Radian Guaranty was not named as a  defendant in the original complaint. On December 4, 2012, plaintif fs amended their complaint to add Radian  Guaranty as an additional defendant. On February 4, 2013, Radian Guaranty filed a motion to dismiss the claims  against it as barred by the statute of limitations.  With respect to the  Samp  case and the other similar putative class actions discussed above, Radian Guaranty believes that  the claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself against these claims.  We are not able to estimate the  reasonably possible loss or range of loss for these matters because the proceedings are in a very preliminary stage and there is  uncertainty as to the likelihood of a class being certified or the ultimate size of a class. In addition to the litigation discussed above, we are involved in litigation that has arisen in the normal course of our  business. We are contesting the allegations in each such pending action and management believes, based on current knowledge  and after consultation with counsel, that the outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse ef fect on our  consolidated financial condition. However , the outcome of litigation and other legal and regulatory matters is inherently  uncertain, and it is possible that one or more of the matters currently pending or threatened could have an unanticipated ef fect  on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations for any particular period. 86