momentum, q$_{d}$ , which gives the current density which after expressing the applied bias in terms of the current density results in Since the samples we consider are typically longer than the electron’s coherence length, we have used the ShF occupa- tions within the main text. For completeness we give also the results for the 2FR case. The spin polarization per unit length of the sample to third order in E is Comparing the last equation with Eq. 14 we see that while the first order term is identical for both occupations, the highe r orders differ by a numerical prefactor. Both of these are larger in the case of partially equilibrated shifted Fermi-like occupa- tions. j = n$_{2}$$_{D}$q$_{d}$ = E$_{F}$ q$_{d}$ . (26) m$_{z}$ = − E j − 2 3 E V 3 E$_{F}$ j + 4 3 E 45 E 2 F j . (28) 7 m$_{z}$ = − E 2 √ 2 E$_{F}$ − 2 3 E V 3 2 E 3 / 2 F − 4 3 E 45 $_{2}$E 5 / 2 F (27) ∗ Electronic address: peter.bokes@stuba.sk 1 Y. K. Kato, R. C. Myers, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Science 306 , 1910 (2004). 2 V. Sih, R. C. Myers, Y. K. Kato, W. H. Lau, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Nature Physics 1 , 31 (2005). 3 J. Wunderlich, B. Kaestner, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 , 047204 (2005). 4 V. Sih, Y. K. Kato, and D. D. Awschalom, Physics World Nov , 33 (2005). 5 J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. A. Sinitsyn, T. Jungwirth, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 126603 (2004). 6 J. I. Inoue, G. E. W. Bauer, and L. W. Molenkamp, Phys. Rev. B 70 , 041303(R) (2004). 7 E. I. Rashba, Phys. Rev. B 70 , 201309(R) (2004). 8 B. K. Nikolic, S. Souma, L. P. Zrbo, and J. Sinova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 046601 (2005). 9 C. P. Moca and D. C. Marinescu, Phys. Rev. B 75 , 035325 (2006). 10 V. A. Zyuzin, P. G. Silvestrov, and E. G. Mishchenko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 , 106601 (2007). 11 A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, and C. A. Balseiro, Phys. Rev. B 73 , 115342 (2006). 12 V. Teodorescu and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. B 80 , 041311(R) (2009). 13 E. B. Sonin, arXiv:0909.3156v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2009). 14 G. Usaj and C. A. Balseiro, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 72 , 631 (2005). 15 J. Yao and Z. Q. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 73 , 033314 (2006). 16 Z. Li and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 77 , 205322 (2008). 17 K. Hattori and H. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. B 74 , 155321 (2006). 18 Y. Xing, Q. F. Sun, L. Tang, and J. P. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 74 , 155313 (2006). 19 S. Bellucci and P. Onorato, Phys. Rev. B 73 , 045329 (2006). 20 S. Bellucci and P. Onorato, Phys. Rev. B 75 , 235326 (2007). 21 Y. Jiang and L. Hu, Phys. Rev. B 74 , 075302 (2006). 22 P. Bokes, F. Corsetti, and R. W. Godby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 , 046402 (2008). 23 P. Debray, J. Wan, S. M. S. Rahman, R. S. Newrock, M. Cahay, A. T. Ngo, S. E. Ulloa, S. T. Herbert, M. Muhammad, and M. Johnson, arXiv:0901.2185v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] (2009). 24 J. J. Krich and B. I. Halperin, Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics) 78 , 035338 (2008). 25 T. Yokoyama and M. Eto, Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics) 80 , 125311 (2009). 26 H. A. Engel, E. I. Rashba, and B. I. Halperin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 , 166605 (2005). 27 R. Winkler, Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole System (Springer, New York, 2003). 28 P. Bokes and R. W. Godby, Phys. Rev. B 68 , 125414 (2003). 29 P. Bokes, H. Mera, and R. W. Godby, Phys. Rev. B 72 , 165425 (2005). 30 J. Rech, T. Micklitz, and K. A. Matveev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 116402 (2009). 31 A. Liebsch, Electornic excitations at metal surfaces (Plenum Press, New York, 1997). 32 H. Mera, P. Bokes, and R. W. Godby, Phys. Rev. B 72 , 085311 (2005). 33 We will use effective atomic units; the distances are measured in multiplies of the effective Bohr radius, a ∗ $_{B}$= r m$_{ef}$ = 9 . 79nm, energy in the effective Hartrees, Ha ∗ = m$_{ef}$ 2 r Ha = 11 . 9meV, both numerical values are given for GaAs where m ∗ $_{e}$= 0 . 067 m$_{e}$ and $_{r}$= 12 . 4 are the effective mass of the electron and the relative permittivity.