Offers scoring less than 60% in the points awarded for a single criterion [or less than 60%  for the single sub-criterion (where applied)] will be excluded from the rest of the  assessment procedure. NOTE on sub-criteria : the  Contracting Authority  may define sub-criteria under the above  AW in the request for offer and evaluate the FWC contractors' offers with those sub-criteria  as presented below. The points of those sub-criteria will be specified at the level of the  specific requests for offer.  40 ID Criteria Max points  Min points AW 1  Quality of the methodological approach  30  18  AW 1.1  To be filled in by the contracting authority (e.g.  max.  20 points)  (e.g.  min.  12 points)  AW 1.2  To be filled in by the contracting authority (e.g.  max.  10 points)  (e.g. min. 6  points)  Etc .  AW 2 Quality of the solution proposed  40  24  AW 2.1 To be filled in by the contracting authority  (e.g.  max.  20 points) (e.g.  min.  12 points) AW 2.2 To be filled in by the contracting authority  (e.g.  max.  20 points) (e.g.  min.  12 points) Etc . - Detail  the  coordination  activities  and  related  monitoring and reporting activities during contract  execution;  - Elaborate on any assumption, risks and quality  assurance/mitigating  measures  to  successfully  manage those events that may affect the overall  quality of the service delivery.  AW 2  Quality of the solution proposed - Describe your solution in detail, including, the  underlying strategy, any relevant technical aspects,  and  key  interdependencies  (tools,  portfolio  applications, required technical input from third  parties, etc.); - Detail the proposed activities for transitioning.  40  24  AW 3  Quality of the resources organisation - Detail the management of your project team from the  start to the end of a specific contract; - Detail the structure of the project team with the list of  assigned resources per profiles, their roles, tasks,  responsibilities,  place  of  work  and  estimated  workloads; 30  18  TOTALS  100  60 