Crime and punishment in scientific research
  Typical arguments against scientific misconduct generally fail to support current policies on research fraud: they may not prove wrong what is usually considered research misconduct and they tend to make wrong things that are not normally seen as scientific fraud, in particular honest errors. I also point out that sanctions are not consistent with the reasons why scientific fraud is supposed to be wrong either. Moreover honestly seeking truth should not be contrived as a moral rule -- it is instead a necessary condition for work to qualify as scientific.   Keywords: cheating; ethics; fabrication; falsification; integrity; plagiarism; research fraud; scientific misconduct. 
Mathieu Bouville