The mystery of the missing GRB redshifts
  It is clear that optical selection effects have distorted the "true" GRB redshift distribution to its presently observed biased distribution. We constrain a statistically optimal model that implies GRB host galaxy dust extinction could account for up to 40% of missing optical afterglows and redshifts in $z = 0-3$, but the bias is negligible at very high-$z$. The limiting sensitivity of the telescopes, and the time to acquire spectroscopic/photometric redshifts, are significant sources of bias for the very high-$z$ sample. We caution on constraining star formation rate and luminosity evolution using the GRB redshift distribution without accounting for these selection effects. 
David Coward, Eric Howell, Marica Branchesi, Dafne Guetta and Chadia   Kanaan
astro-ph.CO