Reply to "Comment on 'Security proof for cryptographic protocols based   only on the monogamy of Bell's inequality violations' "
  In this reply I address the comment by W-Y. Hwang and O. Gittsovich on my paper [Phys. Rev. A {\bf 82}, 032313 (2010)]. The authors of the comment point out that I use implicit assumption that the alphabet of the eavesdropper is binary. They claim that such assumption is unrealistic. Here I show that even without this assumption the main result of my paper still holds. 
M. Pawlowski
quant-ph