On the decay of crossing numbers of sparse graphs
  Richter and Thomassen proved that every graph has an edge $e$ such that the crossing number $\ucr(G-e)$ of $G-e$ is at least $(2/5)\ucr(G) - O(1)$. Fox and Cs. T\'oth proved that dense graphs have large sets of edges (proportional in the total number of edges) whose removal leaves a graph with crossing number proportional to the crossing number of the original graph; this result was later strenghtened by \v{C}ern\'{y}, Kyn\v{c}l and G. T\'oth. These results make our understanding of the {decay} of crossing numbers in dense graphs essentially complete. In this paper we prove a similar result for large sparse graphs in which the number of edges is not artificially inflated by operations such as edge subdivisions. We also discuss the connection between the decay of crossing numbers and expected crossing numbers, a concept recently introduced by Mohar and Tamon. 
Jozsef Balogh, Jesus Leanos, Gelasio Salazar
math.CO