Tree indiscernibilities, revisited
  We give definitions that distinguish between two notions of indiscernibility for a set $\{a_\eta \mid \eta \in \W\}$ that saw original use in \cite{sh90}, which we name \textit{$\s$-} and \textit{$\n$-indiscernibility}. Using these definitions and detailed proofs, we prove $\s$- and $\n$-modeling theorems and give applications of these theorems. In particular, we verify a step in the argument that TP is equivalent to TP$_1$ or TP$_2$ that has not seen explication in the literature. In the Appendix, we exposit the proofs of \citep[{App. 2.6, 2.7}]{sh90}, expanding on the details. 
Byunghan Kim, Hyeung-Joon Kim, Lynn Scow
math.LO