A Dynamic Solar Core model: the SSM-like solution
  I point out that the all the arguments against an astrophysical solution do not exclude a yet not recognised class of solar models, in which an explosive energy source is present in the solar core besides the standard pp and CNO cycle. It is shown from first principle physics that stars have a non-pp,CNO source: local thermonuclear runaways. I derive a model independent inequality, which shows that the problem of the missing beryllium neutrinos lies in that the SuperKamiokande contains a term arising from neutrinos from a runaway source which can produce high-energy electrons and high-energy axions, and muon and tau neutrinos. I point out, that the temperature dependence of the individual neutrino fluxes is related to pure nuclear physics but the usual luminosity constraint is model dependent and actually is a questionable assumption. Allowing non-pp,CNO reaction chains a new approach arises to interpret the neutrino detector data. The explicit temperature dependence leads to $\Phi_{pp} \propto T^4$ instead of the usual $\Phi_{pp} \propto T^{-1/2}$ for the SSM luminosity constraint. I assume a Sun analogue to the SSM with a different $T_c$. The separate neutrino detector equations lead to separate detector-related temperatures with the neutrino detector data. The results show a slightly lower than standard central temperature. I attempt to show that helioseismology is not in a necessary conflict with the dynamic solar model presented here. The results of the calculations may propose solutions to the problems of solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations without an ad hoc introduction of sterile neutrinos and present predictions to Borexino and SNO measurements.   {\it PACS numbers}: 26.65+t, 26.30.+k, 96.60Jw, 95.30.Cq 
Attila Grandpierre