Increasing Exclusion: The Pauli Exclusion Principle and Energy   Conservation for Bound Fermions are Mutually Exclusive
  A review of those forms of standard quantum mechanics that include the Pauli Exclusion Principle as it is applied to atomic species, (that is versions of quantum that are multi-electron and multi-orbital) shows they are not consistent with energy conservation. Particular focus is given to helium in which it is shown that energy conservation is not consistent with current models. If the two electrons in the ground state, per current theory, are at the same energy as the ionization energy, it is demonstrated that according to the standard theory approximately 30 eV are lost during ionization, or alternatively, about 30 eV of energy are created during ionization/electron attachment. The same issue of energy loss during relaxation of energy levels following ionization is shown to exist for all atomic species, thus demonstrating that the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) and energy conservation are not consistent for any atomic species for current forms of distinguishable electron forms of quantum theory. Only that form of quantum that has a single orbital, and for which only one ionization energy can be computed (that is the original Schrodinger form), is consistent with an energy balance. However, this form is not consistent with common spectroscopy results, and it is argued PEP has no meaning in this form of quantum theory. In contrast a new model, Classical Quantum Mechanics (CQM), invented by R. Mills,, following modification, is consistent with all spectroscopy and energy conservation for bound electron systems. This new model is based on the validity of Maxwell s Equations and Newton s Laws at all scales. Detailed, and remarkably simple, computations for determining the ground state energy levels in one and two electron systems using CQM are presented. Agreements with data are excellent. 
Jonathan Phillips