Comment on "Theoretical analysis of the transmission phase shift of a   quantum dot in the presence of Kondo correlations"
  Recently, A. Jerez, P. Vitushinsky and M. Lavagna [Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 127203 (2005)] claimed that the transmission phase through a quantum fot, as measured via the Aharonov-Bohm interferometer, differs from the phase which determines the corresponding conductance. Here we show that this claim is wrong for the single level Anderson model, which is usually used to describe the quantum dot. So far, there exists no derivation of this claim from any explicit theoretical model. 
A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman, Y. Oreg and J. von Delft