A New Approach to Designing Phase I-II Cancer Trials for Cytotoxic   Chemotherapies
  Recently there has been much work on early phase cancer designs that incorporate both toxicity and efficacy data, called Phase I-II designs because they combine elements of both phases. However, they do not explicitly address the Phase II hypothesis test of $H_0: p\le p_0$, where $p$ is the probability of efficacy at the estimated maximum tolerated dose (MTD) $\widehat{\eta}$ from Phase I and $p_0$ is the baseline efficacy rate. Standard practice for Phase II remains to treat $p$ as a fixed, unknown parameter and to use Simon's 2-stage design with all patients dosed at $\widehat{\eta}$. We propose a Phase I-II design that addresses the uncertainty in the estimate $p=p(\widehat{\eta})$ in $H_0$ by using sequential generalized likelihood theory. Combining this with a Phase I design that incorporates efficacy data, the Phase I-II design provides a common framework that can be used all the way from the first dose of Phase I through the final accept/reject decision about $H_0$ at the end of Phase II, utilizing both toxicity and efficacy data throughout. Efficient group sequential testing is used in Phase II that allows for early stopping to show treatment effect or futility. The proposed Phase I-II design thus removes the artificial barrier between Phase I and Phase II, and fulfills the objectives of searching for the MTD and testing if the treatment has an acceptable response rate to enter into a Phase III trial. 
Jay Bartroff and Tze Leung Lai and Balasubramanian Narasimhan
stat.ME stat.AP