Comment on "Casimir force in the $O(n\to\infty)$ model with free   boundary conditions"
  In a recent paper [D. Dantchev, J. Bergnoff, and J. Rudnick, Phys. Rev. E 89, 042116 (2014)] the problem of the Casimir force in the $O(n)$ model on a slab with free boundary conditions, investigated earlier by us [EPL 100, 10004 (2012)], is reconsidered using a mean spherical model with separate constraints for each layer. The authors (i) question the applicability of the Ginzburg-Landau-Wilson approach to the low-temperature regime, arguing for the superiority of their model compared to the family of $\phi^4$ models A and B whose numerically exact solutions we determined both for values of the coupling constant $0<g<\infty$ and $g=\infty$. They (ii) report consistency of their results with ours in the critical region and a strong manifestation of universality, but (iii) point out discrepancies with our results in the region below $T_{\mathrm{c}}$. We show here that (i) is unjustified and prove that our model B with $g=\infty$ is identical to their spherical model. Hence evidence for the reported universality is already contained in our work. Moreover, the results we determined for anyone of the models A and B for various thicknesses $L$ are all numerically exact. (iii) is due to their misinterpretation of our results for the scaling limit. We also show that their low-temperature expansion, which does not hold inside the scaling regime, is limited to temperatures lower than they anticipated. 
H. W. Diehl, Daniel Gr\"uneberg, Martin Hasenbusch, Alfred Hucht,   Sergei B. Rutkevich, Felix M. Schmidt
cond-mat.stat-mech