Extremal Aspects of the Erd\H{o}s--Gallai--Tuza Conjecture
  Erd\H{o}s, Gallai, and Tuza posed the following problem: given an $n$-vertex graph $G$, let $\tau_1(G)$ denote the smallest size of a set of edges whose deletion makes $G$ triangle-free, and let $\alpha_1(G)$ denote the largest size of a set of edges containing at most one edge from each triangle of $G$. Is it always the case that $\alpha_1(G) + \tau_1(G) \leq n^2/4$? We also consider a variant on this conjecture: if $\tau_B(G)$ is the smallest size of an edge set whose deletion makes $G$ bipartite, does the stronger inequality $\alpha_1(G) + \tau_B(G) \leq n^2/4$ always hold?   By considering the structure of a minimal counterexample to each version of the conjecture, we obtain two main results. Our first result states that any minimum counterexample to the original Erd\H{o}s--Gallai--Tuza Conjecture has "dense edge cuts", and in particular has minimum degree greater than $n/2$. This implies that the conjecture holds for all graphs if and only if it holds for all triangular graphs (graphs where every edge lies in a triangle). Our second result states that $\alpha_1(G) + \tau_B(G) \leq n^2/4$ whenever $G$ has no induced subgraph isomorphic to $K_4^-$, the graph obtained from the complete graph $K_4$ by deleting an edge. Thus, the original conjecture also holds for such graphs. 
Gregory J. Puleo
math.CO