Leibniz--Mach foundations for GR and fundamental physics
  Consider the configuration space Q for some physical system, and a continuous group of transformations G whose action on the configurations is declared to be physically irrelevant. Implement G indirectly by adjoining 1 auxiliary g per independent generator of G to Q, by writing the system's action in an arbitrary G-frame (G-AF), and then passing to the quotient Q/G thanks to the constraints encoded by g-variation. I show that this G-AF principle supercedes (and indeed leads to a derivation of) the Barbour--Bertotti (BB) best matching principle. My other consideration is that absolute external time is meaningless for the universe as a whole. For various choices of Q and G, these lead to BB's proposed absolute structure free replacement of Newtoninan mechanics, to Gauge Theory and to the 3-space approach (TSA) formulation of GR. For the latter with matter fields, I discuss the SR postulates, Principle of Equivalence (POE) and simplicity postulates. I explain how a full enough set of fundamental matter fields to describe nature can be accommodated in the TSA, and compare the TSA with the `split spacetime formulation' of Kuchar. I explain the emergence of broken and unbroken Gauge Theories as a consequence of the POE. I also consider as further examples of the G-AF principle the further quotienting out of conformal transformations (CT) or volume preserving CT. Depending on which choices are made, this leads to York's initial value formulation (IVF) of GR, new alternative foundations for it, or alternative theories of gravity built out of similar conformal mathematics which nevertheless admit no GR-like spacetime interpretation. 
Edward Anderson