Disregarding the 'Hole Argument'
  Jim Weatherall has suggested that Einstein's hole argument, as presented by Earman and Norton (1987), is based on a misleading use of mathematics. I argue on the contrary that Weatherall demands an implausible restriction on how mathematics is used. The hole argument, on the other hand, is in no new danger at all. 
Bryan W. Roberts
physics.hist-ph gr-qc