Fitting Bayesian item response models in Stata and Stan
  Stata users have access to two easy-to-use implementations of Bayesian inference: Stata's native {\tt bayesmh} function and StataStan, which calls the general Bayesian engine Stan. We compare these on two models that are important for education research: the Rasch model and the hierarchical Rasch model. Stan (as called from Stata) fits a more general range of models than can be fit by {\tt bayesmh} and is also more scalable, in that it could easily fit models with at least ten times more parameters than could be fit using Stata's native Bayesian implementation. In addition, Stan runs between two and ten times faster than {\tt bayesmh} as measured in effective sample size per second: that is, compared to Stan, it takes Stata's built-in Bayesian engine twice to ten times as long to get inferences with equivalent precision. We attribute Stan's advantage in flexibility to its general modeling language, and its advantages in scalability and speed to an efficient sampling algorithm: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo using the no-U-turn sampler. In order to further investigate scalability, we also compared to the package Jags, which performed better than Stata's native Bayesian engine but not as well as StataStan.   Given its advantages in speed, generality, and scalability, and that Stan is open-source and can be run directly from Stata using StataStan, we recommend that Stata users adopt Stan as their Bayesian inference engine of choice. 
Robert L. Grant and Daniel C. Furr and Bob Carpenter and Andrew Gelman
stat.CO