On the missing log in upper tail estimates
  In the late 1990s, Kim and Vu pioneered an inductive method for showing concentration of certain random variables X. Shortly afterwards, Janson and Ruci{\'n}ski developed an alternative inductive approach, which often gives comparable results for the upper tail Pr(X \ge (1+\eps) E[X]). In some cases, both methods yield upper tail estimates which are best possible up to a logarithmic factor in the exponent, but closing this narrow gap has remained a technical challenge. In this paper we present a BK-inequality based combinatorial sparsification idea that can recover this missing logarithmic term in the upper tail.   As an illustration, we consider random subsets of the integers {1,...,n}, and prove sharp upper tail estimates for various objects of interest in additive combinatorics. Examples include the number of arithmetic progressions, Schur triples, additive quadruples, and (r,s)-sums. 
Lutz Warnke
math.PR math.CO math.NT