Conversational flow in Oxford-style debates
  Public debates are a common platform for presenting and juxtaposing diverging views on important issues. In this work we propose a methodology for tracking how ideas flow between participants throughout a debate. We use this approach in a case study of Oxford-style debates---a competitive format where the winner is determined by audience votes---and show how the outcome of a debate depends on aspects of conversational flow. In particular, we find that winners tend to make better use of a debate's interactive component than losers, by actively pursuing their opponents' points rather than promoting their own ideas over the course of the conversation. 
Justine Zhang, Ravi Kumar, Sujith Ravi, Cristian   Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
cs.CL cs.AI cs.SI physics.soc-ph stat.ML