The opening arguments in that case were by George Drewry Squibb who argued, to the satisfaction of the court, that since the modern class of Doctors of Laws were no longer trained as advocates, their role must necessarily be performed by barristers.
The opening arguments in that case were by George Drewry Squibb. Their role must necessarily be performed by barristers. This was what this George Drewry Squibb argued, to the satisfaction of the court. The modern class of Doctors of Laws were no longer trained as advocates.