Generally, commentators have been of the opinion that Dhul-Qarnayn is actually Alexander, but some characteristics of Dhul-Qarnain described in the Quran, it has been argued, are not applicable to the historical Alexander.
Dhul-Qarnayn is actually Alexander. Commentators have been of the opinion this. This was generally. Some characteristics of Dhul-Qarnain described in the Quran, it has been argued, are not applicable to the historical Alexander.