On public services, he argued that money was a necessary condition of improvement, but that the key was now decentralised and democratic control; local voters needed to be able to hold local decision-takers to account.
That money was a necessary condition of improvement, but that the key was now decentralised. This was what he argued on public services. That money was democratic control; local voters needed to be able to hold local decision-takers to account. This was what he argued on public services.