Finally, the Supreme Court upheld the 1975 extension of Section 5 because of the record of discrimination that continued to persist in the covered jurisdictions, and it suggested the temporary nature of the special provisions was a relevant consideration in determining Section 5's constitutionality.
The Supreme Court upheld the 1975 extension of Section 5 because of the record of discrimination. This was finally. This record of discrimination continued to persist in the covered jurisdictions. It suggested. This was finally. The temporary nature of the special provisions was a relevant consideration in determining Section 5's constitutionality.