The case has been described as "a microcosm of (the 20th) century's debates" in legal philosophy allowing a contrast to be drawn between different judicial approaches to resolving controversies of law, including natural law and legal positivism.
The case has been described as "a microcosm of (the 20th) century's debates" in legal philosophy. This was including natural law. This was including legal positivism. This legal philosophy is allowing a contrast to be drawn between different judicial approaches to resolving controversies of law.