Rational arguments to a person holding a religious conviction will not change the neurotic response of a person, in contrast to Tylor and Frazer who saw religion as rational conscious, but primitive and mistaken attempt to explain the natural world.
Rational arguments to a person will not change the neurotic response of a person to Tylor and Frazer. This is in contrast. This person is holding a religious conviction. This contrast to Tylor and Frazer saw religion as rational conscious, but primitive and mistaken attempt. This was to explain the natural world.