Bioethicist Jacob M. Appel argues that the mandatory disclosure statutes might be unconstitutional on "rational basis" grounds, because childbirth is significantly more dangerous than abortion, data that is not required in any disclosure law, but which is necessary for a meaningful understanding of risks.
The mandatory disclosure statutes might be unconstitutional on "rational basis" grounds, because childbirth is significantly more dangerous than abortion, but which is necessary for a meaningful understanding of risks. This is what Bioethicist Jacob M. Appel argues. Abortion is data. These data is not required in any disclosure law.