This article was disputed in a comment by Marsch and Nissim-Sabat, who pointed out that Van Flandern's source for the aberration argument, Sir Arthur Eddington, had explained that the argument was fallacious.
This article was disputed in a comment by Marsch and Nissim-Sabat. The argument was fallacious. This was what Van Flandern's source for the aberration argument had explained. Sabat pointed out this. Sir Arthur Eddington was the aberration argument.