His descendants and various biographers of the later nineteenth and twentieth centuries defended him, with denial of the pervasiveness of interracial relationships, especially among white masters and enslaved women.
His descendants defended him among white masters and enslaved women. This was with denial of the pervasiveness of interracial relationships. This was especially. Various biographers of the later nineteenth and twentieth centuries defended him among white masters and enslaved women. This was with denial of the pervasiveness of interracial relationships. This was especially.