Subsequent research has left the significance of the first passage of Cicognara's account in dispute: it may be spurious, or he may have repaired the very deck Moakley studied, including the addition of six replacement cards.
Subsequent research has left the significance of the first passage of Cicognara's account in dispute. At the other extreme, his ancestor Antonio may actually have repaired the very deck Moakley studied, including the addition of six replacement cards.