sentence: Article is promoted.
sentences_before: Others are more than welcome to come along and clerk the process, yet they don't. User A nominates article X. Users B and C are not comfortable with a promotion and so decline, but leave comments as to how to improve that article. User D on the other hand thinks it's fine and supports with a rationale. User A then fixes the concerns of B and C, who now support saying their concerns are fixed.
sentences_after: If you actively seek reviews and actively meet concerns that are raised articles will pass - they just take effort and it's not meant to be a walk in the park. Not submitting multiple articles at once also helps you to meet concerns and get reviews. When first set up, the process worked as a straight straw poll using basically a 'first past the post' method. Per above' is acceptable, as is 'My concerns are fixed' if the user originally 'Opposed' and listed issues. The templates could be removed and the discussion would remain with the same outcome.
concept_name: article
headings: Wikipedia:Simple talk/Archive 94 Proposal: Removal of WP:Peer Review Support Removal