Datasets:
Tasks:
Tabular Regression
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
csv
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
DOI:
License:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -11,4 +11,108 @@ tags:
|
|
| 11 |
- life sciences
|
| 12 |
size_categories:
|
| 13 |
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 14 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
- life sciences
|
| 12 |
size_categories:
|
| 13 |
- 10K<n<100K
|
| 14 |
+
---
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
# ComputAge Bench Dataset
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
## Introduction
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
**DNA methylation** is a chemical modification of DNA molecules that is present in many biological species, including humans.
|
| 21 |
+
Specifically, methylation most often occurs at the cytosine nucleotides in a so-called **CpG context** (cytosine followed by a guanine).
|
| 22 |
+
This modification is engaged in a variety of cellular events, ranging from nutrient starvation responses to X-chromosome inactivation to transgenerational inheritance.
|
| 23 |
+
As it turns out, methylation levels per CpG site change systemically in aging, which can be captured by various machine learning (ML) models called **aging clocks**
|
| 24 |
+
and used to predict an individual’s age. Moreover, it has been hypothesized that the aging clocks not only predict chronological age, but can also estimate
|
| 25 |
+
**biological age**, that is, an overall degree of an individual’s health represented as an increase or decrease of predicted age relative to the general population.
|
| 26 |
+
However, comparing aging clock performance is no trivial task, as there is no gold standard measure of one’s biological age, so using MAE, Pearson’s *r*, or other
|
| 27 |
+
common correlation metrics is not sufficient.
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
To foster greater advances in the aging clock field, [we developed a methodology and a dataset]() for aging clock benchmarking, ComputAge Bench, which relies on measuring
|
| 30 |
+
model ability to predict increased ages in samples from patients with *pre-defined* **aging-accelerating conditions** (AACs) relative to samples from
|
| 31 |
+
healthy controls (HC). We highly recommend consulting the Methods and Discussion sections of our paper before proceeding to use this dataset and build
|
| 32 |
+
any conclusions upon it.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
## Dataset description
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
This dataset was collected by combining publicly available datasets of DNA methylation in human blood and saliva samples from the
|
| 37 |
+
[NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (GEO) data repository according to the criteria described in [our publication](),
|
| 38 |
+
and it comprises samples from patients with aging-accelerating conditions and healthy controls. From all these public datasets, we selected only samples that had
|
| 39 |
+
annotated ages and conditions (some disease vs. healthy control).
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
All methylation profiling platforms in this dataset represent different generations of Illumina Infinium BeadChip human methylation arrays.
|
| 42 |
+
Detailed documentation for these platforms can be accessed at the [manufacturer’s website](https://support.illumina.com/?tab=microarrays)
|
| 43 |
+
(Methylation → Select One → Infinium Human Methylation 450K BeadChip or Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip).
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
The dataset consists of two main parts: data and meta. Data is stored with parquet in the “\~/data” folder and contains methylation profiles across samples,
|
| 46 |
+
and meta contains additional information, such as subject’s age, gender, condition, etc., and is stored as “\~/computage_bench_meta.tsv”.
|
| 47 |
+
Both parts are described further below in more details.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
In total, the dataset comprises **10,404 samples** and **900,449 features** (DNA methylation sites) coming from 65 separate studies
|
| 50 |
+
(some features are missing in some files). It is uncommon for ML datasets to have N << P, so we had to put samples as columns and features as rows
|
| 51 |
+
in order to save the dataset in the parquet format. We recommend transposing data upon loading in order to match with meta rows,
|
| 52 |
+
as mentioned further below in the Guidelines section.
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
Its main purpose is to be used in clock benchmarking (for more details on that, again, proceed to the Guidelines section and don’t hesitate to visit
|
| 55 |
+
[our paper]()). Nevertheless, you are free to use it for any other well-minded purpose you find suitable.
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
## Data description
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
DNA methylation per site can be reported in two ways: as **beta values**, or as **M values**. Briefly, beta values represent the ratio of methylated signal
|
| 60 |
+
(probe intensity or sequencing read counts) to total signal per site (methylation signal is measured as probe intensity or sequencing read counts),
|
| 61 |
+
while M value is the log2 ratio of the methylated signal versus an unmethylated signal. A more thorough explanation can be found in
|
| 62 |
+
[Du et al., 2010](https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-587).
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
In the original datasets deposited on GEO, therefore, DNA methylation values were represented either as a beta fraction (ranging from 0 to 1),
|
| 65 |
+
beta percentages (ranging from 0 to 100), or M-values (can be both negative and positive, equals 0 when beta equals 0.5). We converted all data
|
| 66 |
+
to the beta-value fractions ranging from 0 to 1. The values outside this range were treated as missing values (NaNs), as they are not biological.
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
In each dataset, only samples that appeared in the cleaned meta table were retained.
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
### Row names
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
DNA methylation site IDs according to the output from a methylation profiling platform.
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
### Column names
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
GEO sample IDs.
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
## Meta description
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
### Row names
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
GEO sample IDs, as in data columns
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
### Column names
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
**DatasetID**: GEO ID of a dataset that contains a respective sample.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
**PlatformID**: GEO ID of a platform that was used to obtain a respective sample.
|
| 89 |
+
Platform IDs can be mapped to the common platform names (that represent an approximate number of profiled methylation sites) as follows:
|
| 90 |
+
GPL8490 = 27K, GPL13534 = 450K, GPL16304 = 450K, GPL21145 = 850K/EPIC, GPL23976 = 850K/EPIC, GPL29753 = 850K/EPIC.
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
**Tissue**: sample source tissue. “*Blood*” stands for peripheral blood samples, “*Saliva*” stands for saliva spit samples, and “*Buccal*” stands for buccal swab samples.
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
**CellType**: sample cell type. Either a specific cell population (mostly immune cell subtypes with cell type-specific molecular markers)
|
| 95 |
+
or broader sample categories such as whole blood, buffy coat, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), or peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL).
|
| 96 |
+
Some samples lack cell type annotation.
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
**Gender**: abbreviated sample donor gender. *M* = Male, *F* = Female, *O* = Other, *U* = Unknown.
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
**Age**: sample donor chronological age in years (“float” data type). In the original datasets deposited on GEO,
|
| 101 |
+
it can be either rounded by the researchers to full years, or converted from months, weeks, or days. Where available, we calculated years from the smaller units.
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
**Condition**: health or disease state of a sample donor.
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
**Class**: class of the respective sample condition. Healthy control samples (HC) are included in a separate healthy control class with the same abbreviation (HC).
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
## Additional Information
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
### Licensing Information
|
| 111 |
+
|
| 112 |
+
The dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA) v4.0 license.
|
| 113 |
+
|
| 114 |
+
### Citation Information
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
[Citation to be published]
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
|