Item 1. Business
FPL GROUP, INC.
FPL Group, incorporated under the laws of Florida in 1984, is a public utility holding company (as defined in the Holding Company Act) that is engaged, through its subsidiaries, in utility and non-utility operations.
FPL Group is exempt from substantially all of the provisions of the Holding Company Act on the basis that FPL Group's and FPL's businesses are predominantly intrastate in character and carried on substantially in a single state, in which both are incorporated. FPL Group, together with its subsidiaries, employs approximately 12,400 persons.
Utility operations are conducted through FPL, which is engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electric energy. Non- utility operations are conducted through FPL Group Capital and its subsidiaries and consist mainly of investments in non-utility energy projects and agricultural operations.
UTILITY OPERATIONS
General. FPL, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FPL Group, supplies electric service throughout most of the east and lower west coasts of Florida. This service territory contains 27,650 square miles with a population of approximately 6.5 million. During 1993, FPL served approximately 3.4 million customer accounts. Operating revenues amounted to approximately $5.2 billion, of which about 56% was derived from residential customers, 37% from commercial customers, 4% from industrial customers and 3% from other sources. FPL provided approximately 98% of FPL Group's operating revenues in each of the years 1991 through 1993.
Regulation. The retail operations of FPL represent approximately 98% of operating revenues and are regulated by the FPSC, which has jurisdiction over retail rates, service territory, issuances of securities, planning, siting and construction of facilities and other matters. FPL is also subject to regulation by the FERC in various respects, including the acquisition and disposition of certain facilities, interchange and transmission services and wholesale purchases and sales of electric energy.
FPL is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC with respect to its nuclear power plants. NRC regulations govern the granting of licenses for the construction and operation of nuclear power plants and subject such power plants to continuing review and regulation.
Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations cover air and water quality, land use, power plant and transmission line siting, electric and magnetic fields from power lines and substations, noise and aesthetics, solid waste and other environmental matters. Compliance with these laws and regulations increases the cost of electric service by requiring, among other things, changes in the design and operation of existing facilities and changes or delays in the location, design, construction and operation of new facilities. FPL estimates that capital expenditures for improvements needed to comply with environmental laws and regulations will be approximately $10 million to $30 million annually for the years 1994 through 1998. These amounts are included in FPL's projected capital expenditures set forth in Item 1. Capital Expenditures.
FPL holds franchises with varying expiration dates to provide electric service in various municipalities and seven counties in Florida. FPL considers its franchises to be adequate for the conduct of its business.
Retail Ratemaking. The underlying concept of utility ratemaking is to set rates at a level that allows the utility to collect total revenues (revenue requirements) equal to its cost of providing service, including a reasonable return on invested capital. To accomplish this, the FPSC uses various ratemaking mechanisms.
The basic costs of providing electric service, other than fuel and certain other costs, are recovered through base rates, which are designed to recover the costs of constructing, operating and maintaining the utility system. These costs include operations and maintenance expenses, depreciation and taxes, as well as a rate of return on FPL's investment in assets used and useful in providing electric service (rate base). The rate of return on rate base approximates FPL's weighted cost of capital, which includes its costs for debt and preferred stock and an allowed ROE. Base rates are determined in rate proceedings which occur at irregular intervals at the initiative of FPL, the FPSC or a substantially affected party.
Fuel costs are recovered through levelized monthly charges established pursuant to the fuel clause. These charges, which are calculated semi- annually, are based on estimated costs of fuel and estimated customer usage for the ensuing six-month period, plus or minus a true-up adjustment to reflect the variance of actual costs and usage from the estimates used in setting the fuel adjustment charges for prior periods.
Capacity payments to other utilities and generators for purchased power are recovered primarily through the capacity clause. Costs associated with implementing energy conservation programs are recovered through rates established pursuant to the conservation clause. Certain other non-fuel costs and the accelerated recovery of the costs of certain projects that displace oil-fired generation are recovered through the oil-backout clause.
Beginning in April 1994, costs of complying with new federal, state and local environmental regulations will be recovered through the environmental compliance cost recovery clause. In the past such costs would have been recoverable through base rates.
The FPSC has the power to disallow recovery of costs which it considers excessive or imprudently incurred. Such costs may include operations and maintenance expenses, the cost of replacing power lost when fossil and nuclear units are unavailable and costs associated with the construction or acquisition of new facilities. Also, the FPSC does not provide any assurance that the allowed ROE will be achieved.
System Capability and Load. FPL's resources for serving load as of January 1, 1994 consist of 16,708 mw of firm electric power generated by FPL-owned facilities (see Item 2.

Item 2. Properties
FPL Group and its subsidiaries maintain properties which are adequate for their operations. The operating properties of FPL constitute approximately 98% of FPL Group's gross investment in property at December 31, 1993.
Generating Facilities. As of December 31, 1993, FPL had the following generating facilities:
Transmission and Distribution. FPL owns and operates 451 substations with a total capacity of 100,054,470 kva. Electric transmission and distribution lines owned and in service as of December 31, 1993 are as follows:
(1) Includes approximately 80 miles owned jointly with the JEA.
Character of Ownership. Substantially all of FPL's properties are subject to the lien of its mortgage, which secures debt securities issued by FPL. The principal properties of FPL are held by it in fee and are free from other encumbrances, subject to minor exceptions, none of which is of such a nature as to substantially impair the usefulness to FPL of such properties. Some of the electric lines are located on land not owned in fee but are covered by necessary consents of governmental authorities or rights obtained from owners of private property.
Item 3.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In October 1988, Union Carbide Corporation, the corporate predecessor of Praxair, Inc. (Praxair), filed suit against FPL and Florida Power Corporation (Florida Power) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Praxair requested that Florida Power sell power to its facility located within FPL's service territory, and that FPL transport the power to the facility. Florida Power and FPL denied the request as being inconsistent with Florida law and public policy. The FPSC has issued a declaratory statement that FPL's denial of Praxair's request was proper and ordered FPL not to wheel power under such circumstances. The suit alleges that through a territorial agreement, FPL and Florida Power have conspired to eliminate competition for the sale of electric power to retail customers, thereby unreasonably restraining trade and commerce in violation of federal antitrust laws as contained in Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Sherman Act). The suit seeks an award of three times Praxair's alleged damages in an unspecified amount based on alleged higher prices paid for electricity and product sales lost by Praxair. Cross motions for summary judgment were denied. Both parties are appealing the denials.
In November 1988, TEC Cogeneration, Inc., its affiliate Thermo Electron Corporation, RRD Corp. and its affiliate Rolls Royce Inc. filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against FPL Group and its subsidiaries, FPL and ESI, on behalf of South Florida Cogeneration Associates (SFCA), a joint venture which since 1986 has operated a cogeneration facility for Metropolitan Dade County within FPL's service territory in Miami, Florida. The suit alleges that the defendants have engaged in anti-competitive conduct intended to prevent and defeat competition from cogenerators within FPL's service territory and from SFCA's Metropolitan Dade County facility in particular. It alleges that the defendants' actions constitute monopolization and attempts to monopolize in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act; conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act; unlawful discrimination in prices, services or facilities in violation of Section 2 of the Clayton Act; and intentional interference with SFCA's contractual relationship with Metropolitan Dade County in violation of Florida law. The suit seeks damages in excess of $100 million, to be trebled under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, as well as compensatory and punitive damages under Florida law, and injunctive relief. A motion for summary judgment by FPL Group, FPL and ESI has been denied.
In November 1989, Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc. (Johnson Enterprises) filed suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida against FPL Group, FPL Group Capital and Telesat, a subsidiary of FPL Group Capital. The suit, which arises out of a cable television facilities installation agreement between Johnson Enterprises and Telesat, alleges breach of contract, fraud and violations of racketeering statutes. The suit seeks compensatory damages in excess of $24 million, treble damages under racketeering activity statutes, punitive damages and attorneys' fees, as well as the revocation of Telesat's corporate charter and cable television franchises.
FPL Group believes that it and its subsidiaries have meritorious defenses to all of the litigation described above and is vigorously defending these suits. Accordingly, the liabilities, if any, arising from this litigation are not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on FPL Group's financial statements.
Item 4.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
PART II
Item 5.

Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Common Stock Data. FPL Group's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
The high and low sales prices for the common stock of FPL Group as reported in the consolidated transaction reporting system of the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter during the past two years are as follows:
Approximate Number of Stockholders. As of the close of business on February 28, 1994, there were 85,688 holders of record of FPL Group's common stock.
Dividends. Quarterly dividends have been paid on common stock of FPL Group during the past two years in the following amounts:
The amount and timing of dividends payable on common stock are within the sole discretion of FPL Group's Board of Directors. The increases in the annual dividend rates shown in the table above should not be viewed as indicating a trend for the future. As a practical matter, the ability of FPL Group to pay dividends on its common stock is dependent upon dividends paid to it by its subsidiaries, primarily FPL. Given FPL's current financial condition, there are no restrictions in effect that currently limit FPL's ability to pay dividends to FPL Group. See Management's Discussion - Financial Covenants.
Item 6.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Certain amounts included in prior years' selected financial data were reclassified to conform to current year's presentation.
(1) Reduced by after-tax effect of cost reduction program or restructuring charge. See Note 4. (2) Reduced by charges related to the write-down of businesses to be discontinued. See Note 5. (3) Reduced by charges related to the disposition of Colonial Penn. See Note 6. (4) Includes unbilled sales. (5) The winter season generally represents November and December of the prior year and January through March of the current year. (6) Includes unbilled and deferred cost recovery clause revenues.
Item 7.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
For the three periods presented, net income benefitted from increased energy sales, primarily from customer growth, and the effects of cost control measures. Charges associated with a cost reduction program in 1993 and a corporate restructuring in 1991 reduced net income in those years. In addition, 1992 net income was adversely affected by Hurricane Andrew. In the following discussion, all comparisons are with the corresponding items in the prior year.
Operating Income - Approximately 98% of FPL Group's operating revenue is derived from the electric utility operations of FPL. FPL's retail operations are regulated by the FPSC. Energy sales to retail customers, which represent over 96% of total energy sales, increased 4.0%, 0.1% and 3.3% in 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Retail customer growth for those years was 2.1%, 1.7% and 2.1%, respectively. Revenues from base rates, which represented 61%, 57% and 56% of total operating revenues for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively, increased for the three years presented due to higher energy sales. Revenues derived from cost recovery clauses (including fuel) and franchise fees comprise substantially all of the remaining portion of operating revenues. These revenues represent a pass-through of costs and do not significantly affect net income.
With increasing competition in the utility industry, FPL is continuing its efforts to reduce its operating and capital costs and avoid filing for rate increases, the traditional response to increased rate base and cost pressures. In connection with these efforts, a major cost reduction program was implemented during 1993, resulting in a $138 million pretax charge. The charge consisted primarily of severance pay and employee retirement benefits related to a workforce reduction of approximately 1,700 positions. Approximately 45% of the charge relates to retirement benefits. Substantially all of the balance represents severance costs, of which about $60 million remains to be paid in 1994. In addition, substantial reductions were reflected in FPL's 1994-98 capital expenditure forecast, including a $210 million reduction from the previous capital expenditure forecast for 1994. The majority of the reductions in the 1994-97 period reflect a decrease in transmission and distribution expenditures through more efficient use of existing plant and more cost effective designs for new facilities. In 1991, FPL implemented a corporate restructuring that eliminated approximately 1,400 FPL positions and about 900 contractor positions. See Note 4.
Other operations and maintenance expenses reflect cost savings from the 1991 restructuring, partially offset by the effects of an increasing customer base, changes in prices and operating activities, as well as the implementation of two new accounting standards relating to postretirement and postemployment benefits. See Note 3. As a result of FPL's recent cost reduction measures, other operations and maintenance expense is expected to decline in 1994, despite projected sales growth, additional generating units in service and two additional nuclear refueling outages. Higher utility plant balances, reflecting facilities added to meet customer growth, resulted in increased depreciation expense in each of the last three years. FPL filed new depreciation studies with the FPSC in December 1993. Changes in depreciation rates, when adopted, will be retroactive to January 1994 and, together with increases in utility plant, will increase depreciation expense in 1994. In addition, FPL is scheduled to file updated nuclear decommissioning studies with the FPSC in December 1994. Changes, if any, in the accrual for nuclear decommissioning costs will be effective January 1995. See Note 1.
Non-Operating Income and Deductions - Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) increased in 1993 and 1992 due to higher construction activity in the generation area. In future periods AFUDC is expected to decrease because the repowered Lauderdale units were placed in service in the second quarter of 1993, the Martin units are scheduled to be in service by June 1994 and no new generating capacity is under construction.
Despite the obligation to fund growth in electric plant, interest and preferred dividends were relatively flat over the three-year period due to refunding approximately $3.3 billion of debt and preferred stock with lower rate instruments.
The income contribution from other-net increased in 1993 mainly due to improved equity in earnings of partnerships and joint ventures associated with ESI Energy, Inc. (ESI) and its non-utility energy projects. This increase was largely offset by premiums paid to redeem high cost debt of FPL Group Capital Inc (FPL Group Capital). Premiums paid on the redemption of FPL debt are amortized over the remaining life of the respective debt securities, consistent with the ratemaking treatment. See Note 1.
Effective January 1, 1993, the corporate federal income tax rate increased from 34% to 35%. The rate change increased income tax expense by approximately $11 million, including $4 million resulting from the adjustment of the deferred income tax balances of the non-utility subsidiaries.
Pending Accounting Changes - In November 1993, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (SOP) 93-6, "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans." If adopted, SOP 93-6 would significantly change the manner in which FPL Group recognizes compensation expense associated with the matching contributions to its thrift plans. Based on preliminary estimates, adoption of the statement would reduce net income by approximately $20 million but would increase earnings per share by $0.04 in 1994, since shares held by the trust for the thrift plans that have not been allocated to employees would not be considered outstanding for purposes of computing earnings per share. FPL Group is not required to adopt the accounting guidance in this pronouncement and is evaluating whether to adopt it.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Requirements and Resources - FPL Group's primary capital requirements consist of expenditures under FPL's construction program. FPL's capital expenditures for the period 1994-98, including AFUDC, are expected to be $3.7 billion, including $879 million in 1994. Internally generated funds are expected to fund an increasing percentage of capital expenditures. The balance will be provided primarily through the issuance of FPL long-term debt, preferred stock and commercial paper.
FPL Group Capital and ESI have committed to invest approximately $3.2 million in, and lend approximately $4.2 million to, partnerships and joint ventures entered into through ESI, all of which are expected to be funded in 1994. Additionally, FPL Group Capital and its subsidiaries, primarily ESI, have guaranteed up to approximately $89.2 million of lease obligations, debt service payments and other payments subject to certain contingencies.
Debt maturities and minimum sinking fund requirements will require cash outflows of approximately $809 million through 1998, including $280 million in 1994. See Note 10. Bank lines of credit currently available to FPL Group and its subsidiaries aggregate $950 million.
Financial Covenants - FPL Group's charter does not limit the dividends that may be paid on its common stock; however, FPL's charter and mortgage contain provisions which, under certain conditions, restrict the payment of dividends and other distributions to FPL Group. Given FPL's current financial condition and level of earnings, these restrictions do not currently limit FPL's ability to pay dividends to FPL Group. FPL's charter limits the amount of unsecured debt and FPL's mortgage limits the amount of secured debt FPL can issue. At December 31, 1993, the charter and mortgage provisions would allow issuance of approximately $1.3 billion of additional unsecured debt and $5.5 billion of additional first mortgage bonds, respectively. The amount of additional first mortgage bonds that are permitted to be issued will increase as the amount of unfunded property additions increases. FPL's charter also prohibits the issuance of preferred stock unless the preferred stock coverage ratio, as prescribed, is at least 1.5; for the 12 months ended December 31, 1993 it was 2.24.
FPL Group Capital, under a financial covenant in connection with a bank loan, is required to maintain a minimum level of consolidated net worth. At December 31, 1993, the required level was $100 million and actual consolidated net worth of FPL Group Capital was $333 million.
Item 8.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
FPL GROUP, INC.:
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of FPL Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, listed in the accompanying index as Item 14(a)1 of this Annual Report (Form 10-K) to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 1993. Our audits also comprehended the financial statement schedules of FPL Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, listed in the accompanying index as Item 14(a)2. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FPL Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1993 and 1992 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1993 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information shown therein.
As discussed in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, FPL Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries changed their method of accounting for income taxes and postretirement benefits other than pensions effective January 1, 1993.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE Certified Public Accountants
Miami, Florida February 11, 1994
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands, except per share amounts)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ASSETS (Thousands of dollars)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES (Thousands of dollars)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Thousands of Dollars)
(1) Represents the effect on cash flows from operating activities of the net amounts deferred or recovered under the fuel and purchased power, oil-backout, energy conservation, capacity and environmental cost recovery clauses. (2) Excludes allowance for other funds used during construction.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991
1. Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies
Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FPL Group, Inc. (FPL Group) and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts included in prior years' consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation.
Regulation - The principal operating company of FPL Group is Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), a utility subject to regulation by the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). As a result of such regulation, FPL follows the accounting practices set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation."
Revenues and Rates - FPL's retail and wholesale utility rate schedules are approved by the FPSC and the FERC, respectively. FPL records the estimated amount of base revenues for energy delivered to customers but not billed. Such unbilled revenues are included in receivables - customers and amounted to approximately $112 million and $120 million at December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively.
Revenues include amounts resulting from cost recovery clauses, which are designed to permit full recovery of certain costs and provide a return on certain assets utilized by these programs, and franchise fees. Such revenues represent a pass-through of costs and include substantially all fuel, purchased power and interchange expenses, conservation-related expenses, revenue taxes and franchise fees. Revenues from cost recovery clauses are recorded when billed; FPL achieves matching of costs and related revenues by deferring the net under or over recovery.
Electric Utility Plant, Depreciation and Amortization - The cost of additions to units of utility property is added to electric utility plant. The cost of units of property retired, less net salvage, is charged to accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs of property as well as replacements and renewals of items determined to be less than units of property are charged to operating expenses - other operations and maintenance of utility plant.
Depreciation of utility property is provided primarily on a straight-line average remaining life basis. Depreciation studies are performed at least every four years for substantially all utility property. The weighted annual composite depreciation rate was approximately 3.9%, 3.5% and 3.8% for the years 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. These rates exclude decommissioning expense and certain accelerated depreciation under cost recovery clauses. All depreciation methods and rates are approved by the FPSC.
Nuclear fuel costs, including a charge for spent nuclear fuel disposal, is accrued in fuel expense on a unit of production method.
Substantially all electric utility plant is subject to the lien of the Mortgage and Deed of Trust, as supplemented, securing FPL's first mortgage bonds.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) - FPL recognizes AFUDC as a noncash item which represents the allowed cost of capital used to finance a portion of FPL's construction work in progress. AFUDC is capitalized as an additional cost of utility plant and is recorded as an addition to income. The capitalization rate used in computing AFUDC was 8.67% from January 1993 through June 1993, 8.26% from July 1993 through December 1993, 8.61% in 1992 and 8.46% in 1991. FPL allocates total AFUDC between borrowed funds and other funds. The portion of AFUDC attributable to short and long-term borrowed funds amounted to $31 million, $27 million and $17 million for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
Nuclear Decommissioning - FPL accrues nuclear decommissioning costs over the expected service life of each plant. Nuclear decommissioning studies are performed at least every five years for FPL's four nuclear units. A provision for nuclear decommissioning of $38 million for each of the years 1993, 1992 and 1991 is included in depreciation expense. The accumulated provision for nuclear decommissioning totaled $445 million and $390 million at December 31, 1993 and 1992, respectively, and is included in accumulated depreciation.
Amounts equal to decommissioning expense are deposited in either qualified funds on a pretax basis or in a non-qualified fund on a net of tax basis. Fund earnings, net of taxes, are reinvested in the funds. Both fund earnings and the charge resulting from reinvestment of the earnings are included in other income - net. The related income tax effects are included in deferred taxes. The decommissioning reserve funds, the predominant component of the utility special use funds, may be used only for the payment of the cost of decommissioning FPL's nuclear units. Securities held in the funds consist primarily of tax-exempt obligations and are carried at cost. See Note 11.
The most recent decommissioning studies assume prompt dismantlement for the Turkey Point nuclear units commencing in the year 2005 and for St. Lucie Unit No. 2 commencing in 2021. St. Lucie Unit No. 1 will be mothballed in 2016 until St. Lucie Unit No. 2 is ready for dismantlement. FPL's portion of the cost of decommissioning these units, including dismantlement and reclamation, expressed in 1993 dollars, is currently estimated to aggregate $935 million.
Storm and Property Insurance Reserve Fund - The storm and property insurance reserve fund provides coverage toward storm damage costs and possible retrospective premium assessments stemming from a nuclear incident under the various insurance programs covering FPL's nuclear generating plants. The storm and property insurance reserve represents amounts accumulated to date net of expenditures for storm damages. The related income tax effects are included in accumulated deferred income taxes. Securities held in the fund consist primarily of tax-exempt obligations and are carried at cost. In 1992, $21 million of the storm fund was used for storm damage costs associated with Hurricane Andrew. See Note 11.
Investments in Partnerships and Joint Ventures - The majority of investments in partnerships and joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method. The cost method is used when FPL Group has virtually no ability to influence the operating or financial decisions of the investee.
Securities Transactions - Marketable securities are held by a consolidated limited partnership and are accounted for at market value. Partnership assets are managed by an independent investment advisor. Earnings on the investments are included in other - net in the consolidated statements of income.
Included in other current liabilities at December 31, 1993 are approximately $94 million of securities sold, but not yet purchased. These obligations are carried at their market value and create off-balance sheet market risk to the extent that the market value of the underlying securities (U.S. Treasury Notes) subsequently increases.
Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The carrying amount of these investments approximates their market value.
Retirement of Long-Term Debt - The excess of FPL's reacquisition cost over the book value of long-term debt is deferred and amortized to expense ratably over the remaining life of the original issue, which is consistent with its treatment in the ratemaking process. FPL Group Capital Inc (FPL Group Capital) expenses this cost in the period incurred.
Rate Matters - Deferred litigation items of FPL at December 31, 1993 and 1992, represent costs approved by the FPSC for recovery over five years commencing with the effective date of new base rates to be established in the next general rate proceeding.
Income Taxes - Deferred income taxes are provided on all significant temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Investment tax credits are used to reduce current federal income taxes and, in the case of FPL, are deferred and amortized to income over the approximate lives of the related property.
2. Income Taxes
In 1993, FPL Group adopted SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires the use of the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, the tax effect of temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities are reported as deferred taxes measured at current tax rates. At FPL, the principal effect of adopting SFAS No. 109 was the reclassification of the revenue equivalent of deferred taxes in excess of the amount required to be reported as a liability under SFAS No. 109 from accumulated deferred income taxes to a newly-established deferred regulatory credit - income taxes. This amount will be amortized over the estimated lives of the assets or liabilities which resulted in the initial recognition of the deferred tax amount. Adoption of this standard had no effect on results of operations. The net result of amortizing the deferred regulatory credit and the related deferred taxes established under SFAS No. 109 is to yield comparable amounts to those included in the tax provision under accounting rules applicable to prior periods.
The components of income taxes are as follows:
A reconciliation between income tax expense and the expected income tax expense at the applicable statutory rates is as follows:
The income tax effects of discontinued operations in 1991 differ from the effects computed at statutory rates primarily due to FPL Group's assessment of loss disallowance rules and limitations on the ability to utilize capital loss benefits. FPL Group plans to challenge the loss disallowance rules. Based on the uncertainties associated with the ultimate outcome of this challenge and recognition of offsetting capital gains, a valuation allowance was recorded to fully offset the effect of establishing a deferred tax asset of approximately $170 million under SFAS No. 109 for the tax benefits of the capital loss carryforward.
The income tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to FPL Group's consolidated deferred income tax assets and liabilities after adoption of SFAS No. 109 are as follows:
3. Employee Retirement Benefits
Pension Benefits - Substantially all employees of FPL Group and its subsidiaries are covered by a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. Plan benefits are generally based on employees' years of service and compensation during the last years
of employment. Participants are vested after five years of service. Plan assets consist primarily of bonds, common stocks and short-term investments.
For 1993, 1992 and 1991 the components of pension cost, a portion of which has been capitalized, are as follows:
Prior to 1993, an adjustment was made to reflect in the results of operations FPL's pension cost calculated under the actuarial cost method used for utility ratemaking purposes. In 1993, FPL adopted consistent pension measurements for ratemaking and financial reporting. The accumulated regulatory adjustment is being amortized to income over five years. At December 31, 1993 and 1992, the cumulative amount of this regulatory adjustment included in other liabilities was approximately $16 million and $20 million, respectively.
During 1992, the method used for valuing plan assets in the calculation of pension cost was changed from fair value to a calculated market-related value. The new method was adopted to reduce the volatility in annual pension expense that results from short-term fluctuations in the securities markets. The cumulative effect of the change was to reduce prepaid pension costs and the related accumulated regulatory adjustment by approximately $37 million, with no effect on earnings.
During 1993, the effect of a prior plan amendment that changed the manner in which benefits accrue was recognized and included as part of prior service cost to be amortized over the remaining service life of the employees.
FPL Group funds the pension cost calculated under the entry age normal level percentage of pay actuarial cost method, provided that this amount satisfies the Employee Retirement Income Security Act minimum funding standards and is not greater than the maximum tax deductible amount for the year. No contributions to the plan were required for 1993, 1992 or 1991.
A reconciliation of the funded status of the plan to the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets is presented below:
(1) Includes $37 million effect of changing to calculated market-related method of valuing plan assets.
As of December 31, 1993 and 1992, the weighted-average discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation was 7.0% and 6.0%, respectively. The assumed rate of increase in future compensation levels at those respective dates was 5.5% and 6.0%. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining pension cost was 7.75% for 1993 and 7.0% for 1992 and 1991.
Other Postretirement Benefits - FPL Group and its subsidiaries have defined benefit postretirement plans for health care and life insurance benefits that cover substantially all employees. Eligibility for health care benefits is based upon age plus years of service at retirement. The plans are contributory, and contain cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. FPL Group has capped company contributions for postretirement health care at a defined level which, depending on actual claims experience, may be reached by the year 2000. Generally, life insurance benefits for retirees are capped at $50,000. FPL Group's policy is to fund postretirement benefits in amounts determined at the discretion of management. Benefit payments in 1993 and 1992 totaled $13 million and $12 million, respectively, and were paid out of existing plan assets.
In 1993, FPL Group adopted SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions." For the year ended December 31, 1993, the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost, a portion of which has been capitalized, are as follows:
A reconciliation of the funded status of the plan to the amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets is presented below:
The weighted-average annual assumed rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered benefits (i.e., health care cost trend rate) for 1993 is 10.5% for retirees under age 65 and 6.5% for retirees over age 65. These rates are assumed to decrease gradually to 6.0% by the year 2000, which is when it is anticipated that benefit costs will reach the defined level at which company contributions will be capped. The cap on FPL Group's contributions mitigates the potential significant increase in costs resulting from an increase in the health care cost trend rate. Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage point would increase the plan's accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 1993 by $8 million, and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost of the plan for 1993 by approximately $1 million.
The weighted-average discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 7.0% at December 31, 1993. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets was 7.75% at December 31, 1993.
Postemployment Benefits - In 1993, FPL Group adopted SFAS No. 112, "Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits," which requires a change from recognizing expenses when paid to recording the benefits as the liability is incurred. Implementation of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on FPL Group's results of operations.
4. Cost Reduction Program and Restructuring Charge
In 1993, FPL implemented a major cost reduction program, which resulted in a $138 million charge and reduced net income by approximately $85 million. The program consisted primarily of a Voluntary Retirement Plan (VRP) and a Special Severance Plan (SSP). The VRP was offered to all employees who were at least 54 years of age and had at least 10 years of service. The plan, among other things, added five years to age and service for the determination of plan benefits to be received by eligible employees. Approximately 700 employees, or 75% of those eligible, elected to retire under this program. The impact on pension cost resulting from the two programs as determined under the provisions of SFAS No. 88, "Employers' Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits," was approximately $34 million. The impact on postretirement benefits as determined under SFAS No. 106, "Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions" was approximately $29 million. These amounts are included as part of the total charge of $138 million. See Note 3.
In 1991, FPL recorded a $90 million restructuring charge in connection with a company-wide restructuring which reduced net income by $56 million. The charge included severance pay for departing employees, as well as relocation and facility modification expenditures.
5. Businesses to be Discontinued
In 1990, FPL Group decided to sell or otherwise dispose of the real estate, cable television, environmental remediation and utility-related services businesses. In 1991, the environmental remediation and utility-related services businesses were sold with no significant impact on net income. During 1993, FPL Group sold or otherwise liquidated certain cable television and real estate assets, including cable television operating systems, interests in three cable television joint ventures and real estate rental properties. FPL Group's remaining developed real estate properties are under contract for sale. This pending sale, if closed, and the currently estimated result of disposing of the balance of FPL Group's cable television and real estate assets are not expected to have a significant adverse effect on net income.
6. Discontinued Operations
In 1991, Colonial Penn Group, Inc. (Colonial Penn) was sold, resulting in a $135 million after-tax loss. The sale did not include Bay Loan and Investment Bank (Bay Loan), a former Colonial Penn subsidiary, which is winding down its operations and will be dissolved. The principal business of Bay Loan was investing in loans secured by real estate using funds provided from the issuance of insured certificates of deposit. Bay Loan ceased investing in new loans in 1990 and is in the process of effecting an orderly liquidation. The date when such liquidation will be completed cannot be predicted with certainty because it is dependent on the timing of loan prepayments and asset sales. FPL Group has no legal obligation and has no intention to contribute additional equity to Bay Loan. The investment in Bay Loan was written off in 1990; the orderly liquidation of its operations is not expected to have an adverse effect on FPL Group's future operating results.
Colonial Penn and Bay Loan have been accounted for as discontinued operations. Operating revenues of Bay Loan were $16.3 million and $21.4 million for 1993 and 1992, respectively. Combined operating revenues of Colonial Penn (through date of closing) and Bay Loan were $714.1 million for 1991. Bay Loan reported operating income of $5.1 million in 1993 and operating losses of $5.9 million and $8.5 million in 1992 and 1991, respectively. The losses incurred subsequent to the measurement date (date on which Bay Loan was initially classified as discontinued operations) had no effect on FPL Group's results of operations as such losses had been provided for in the loss on disposal of discontinued operations in 1991.
The remaining assets of Bay Loan consist primarily of loans secured by real estate and real estate owned as a result of foreclosures. Most of Bay Loan's loan customers and the real estate securing their loans are located in the northeast United States. The remaining liabilities of Bay Loan consist primarily of FDIC-insured certificates of deposit, which will be settled with funds generated from loan repayments and the sale of Bay Loan assets. Total assets and liabilities of Bay Loan at December 31, 1993 were $149.3 million and $129.7 million, respectively. Total assets and liabilities of Bay Loan at December 31, 1992 were $194.9 million and $180.4 million, respectively. The carrying amounts of assets and liabilities at December 31, 1993 and 1992, approximate the estimated fair values of the financial instruments of Bay Loan.
7. Leases
In 1991, FPL expanded its nuclear fuel lease program to include all four of its nuclear units. In connection with this expansion, FPL sold to a non-affiliated lessor and leased back approximately $220 million of nuclear fuel held in reactors of these units, as well as nuclear fuel in various stages of enrichment. The fuel was sold at book value. Nuclear fuel payments, which are based on energy production and are charged to fuel expense, were $122 million, $120 million and $81 million for the years ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Included in these payments was an interest component of $11 million, $13 million and $9 million in 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Under certain circumstances of lease termination, FPL is required to purchase all nuclear fuel in whatever form at a purchase price designed to allow the lessor to recover its net investment cost in the fuel, which totaled $226 million at December 31, 1993. For ratemaking purposes, the leases encompassed within this lease arrangement are classified as operating leases. For financial reporting purposes, the capital lease obligation is recorded at the amount due in the event of lease termination.
In 1992, FPL entered into a noncancelable capital lease arrangement for an office building whose net book value at December 31, 1993 and 1992 was approximately $46 million and $48 million, respectively. The present value of future minimum lease payments at December 31, 1993 totaled $49 million. Future minimum annual lease payments under this lease arrangement, which expires in 2016, are estimated to be $4 million.
Excluding these leases, the amount of assets and capitalized lease obligations for other capital leases is not material.
FPL Group, through its subsidiaries, leases automotive, computer, office and other equipment through rental agreements with various terms and expiration dates. Rental expense totaled $33 million, $55 million and $51 million for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments for noncancelable operating leases are $22 million for 1994, $19 million for 1995, $13 million for 1996, $7 million for 1997, $6 million for 1998 and $15 million thereafter.
8. Jointly-Owned Electric Utility Plant
FPL owns approximately 85% of the St. Lucie Nuclear Unit No. 2, 20% of the St. Johns River Power Park (SJRPP) units and coal terminal and a 49% undivided interest in Scherer Unit No. 4. FPL expects to purchase an additional 27% undivided ownership interest in Scherer Unit No. 4 in two stages through 1995. At December 31, 1993, FPL's investment in St. Lucie Unit No. 2 was $768 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $397 million; the investment in the SJRPP units and coal terminal was $221 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $110 million; the investment in Scherer Unit No. 4 was $296 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $54 million.
FPL is responsible for its share of the operating costs, as well as providing its own financing. At December 31, 1993, there was no significant balance of construction work in progress on these facilities.
9. Common Shareholders' Equity
The changes in common shareholders' equity accounts are as follows:
Common Stock Dividend Restrictions - FPL Group's Charter does not limit the dividends that may be paid on its common stock. As a practical matter, the ability of FPL Group to pay dividends on its common stock is dependent upon dividends paid to it by its subsidiaries, primarily FPL. FPL's charter and mortgage contain provisions that, under certain conditions, restrict the payment of dividends and other distributions to FPL Group. Given FPL's current financial condition and level of earnings, these restrictions do not currently limit FPL's ability to pay dividends to FPL Group.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan - The employee thrift plans of FPL Group and FPL include a leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan feature. Shares of common stock held by the Trust for the Thrift Plans (Trust) are used to provide all or a portion of the employers' matching contributions. In 1990, the Trust borrowed the funds from FPL Group Capital, at an interest rate of 9.69% to purchase the shares and is repaying the loan with dividends received on the shares along with cash contributions from the employers. Reducing stockholders' equity at December 31, 1993 is approximately $317 million of unearned compensation related to unallocated shares of common stock held by the Trust. The unallocated shares are considered outstanding for purposes of computing earnings per share. Dividends paid aggregated approximately $30 million in all years.
In November 1993, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued SOP 93-6, "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans." If adopted, SOP 93-6 would significantly change the manner in which FPL Group recognizes compensation expense associated with the matching contributions to its thrift plans. Based on preliminary estimates, adoption of the standard would reduce net income by approximately $20 million but would increase earnings per share by $0.04 in 1994, since shares held by the Trust which have not yet been allocated to employees would not be considered outstanding for purposes of computing earnings per share. FPL Group is not required to adopt the accounting guidance in this pronouncement and is evaluating whether or not to adopt it.
Long-Term Incentive Plan - FPL Group has a long-term incentive plan under which an aggregate of 4 million shares may be awarded to officers and key employees of FPL Group and its subsidiaries. At December 31, 1993, 3,304,739 shares were available for future awards. Total compensation charged against earnings under the incentive plan, and the effect on earnings per share, were not material in any year. The changes in share awards under the incentive plan are as follows:
(1) Payment of performance shares is based on the market price of FPL Group's common stock when the related performance goal is achieved. (2) Shares of restricted stock were issued at market value at the date of the grant. (3) All outstanding options are exercisable at $30 7/8.
Stock appreciation rights in an equivalent amount have been granted in conjunction with the options referred to above. No awards of incentive stock options have been granted as of December 31, 1993.
Other - FPL Group has reserved 17 million shares of common stock for issuance under the Dividend Reinvestment and Common Share Purchase Plan and Employee Benefit Plans. At December 31, 1993, 9 million of the shares reserved for these plans had been issued. Each share of common stock has been granted a Preferred Share Purchase Right, which is exercisable in the event of certain attempted business combinations. The Rights will cause substantial dilution to a person or group attempting to acquire FPL Group on terms not approved by the FPL Group Board of Directors.
10. Preferred Stock and Long-Term Debt
Preferred Stock (1)(2)
(1) FPL Group's charter authorizes the issuance of 100 million shares of serial preferred stock, $.01 par value. None of these shares are outstanding. (2) FPL's charter authorizes the issuance of 5 million shares of subordinated preferred stock, no par value. No shares of subordinated preferred stock are outstanding. In 1993, FPL issued 1,900,000 shares of $100 par value preferred stock. In 1992, FPL issued 5,000,000 shares of $2.00 No Par Value, Series A, preferred stock. There were no issuances of preferred stock in 1991. (3) Not redeemable prior to 2003. (4) Minimum annual sinking fund requirements on preferred stock are approximately $2 million for each of the years 1994 and 1995 and $4 million for each of the years 1996, 1997 and 1998. In the event that FPL should be in arrears on its sinking fund obligations, FPL may not pay dividends on common stock. (5) Entitled to a sinking fund to retire a minimum of 15,000 shares and a maximum of 30,000 shares annually from 1994 through 2026 at $100 per share plus accrued dividends. FPL redeemed and retired 15,000 shares in 1992, satisfying the 1993 minimum annual sinking fund requirement. (6) Entitled to a sinking fund to retire a minimum of 25,000 shares and a maximum of 50,000 shares annually from 1996 through 2015 at $100 per share plus accrued dividends.
Long-Term Debt (1)(2)
(1) Minimum annual maturities and sinking fund requirements of long-term debt are approximately $278 million for 1994, $82 million for 1995, $101 million for 1996, $151 million for 1997 and $181 million for 1998. (2) Available lines of credit aggregated approximately $950 million at December 31, 1993, all of which were based on firm commitments. (3) Excludes approximately $46 million principal amount of bonds removed from the balance sheet in December 1993 as a result of an in-substance defeasance. Such bonds were redeemed in January 1994 with funds previously placed in an irrevocable trust.
11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following estimates of the fair value of financial instruments have been made using available market information and other valuation methodologies. However, the use of different market assumptions or methods of valuation could result in different estimated fair values.
(1) Based on quoted market prices for these or similar issues. (2) Includes current maturities.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Capital Commitments - FPL has made certain commitments in connection with its projected capital expenditures. These expenditures, for the construction or acquisition of additional facilities and equipment to meet customer demand, are estimated to be $3.7 billion, including AFUDC, for the years 1994 through 1998.
FPL Group Capital and ESI Energy, Inc. (ESI), have committed to invest $3 million in, and lend approximately $4 million to, partnerships and joint ventures entered into through ESI, all of which are expected to be funded in 1994. Additionally, FPL Group Capital and its subsidiaries, primarily ESI, have guaranteed up to approximately $89 million of lease obligations, debt service payments and other payments subject to certain contingencies.
FPL Group, through a consolidated limited partnership, has entered into forward commitments at December 31, 1993 to purchase $100 million of mortgage-backed securities on various dates through February 1994 at specified prices. The market value of these securities totaled $100 million at December 31, 1993. Additionally, the partnership had entered into forward commitments to sell short $87 million of U.S. Treasury Notes on various dates in January 1994 at specified prices. At December 31, 1993, the market value of those securities totaled $89 million.
Insurance - Liability for accidents at nuclear power plants is governed by the Price-Anderson Act, which limits the liability of nuclear reactor owners to the amount of the insurance available from private sources and under an industry retrospective payment plan. In accordance with this Act, FPL maintains $200 million of private liability insurance, which is the maximum obtainable, and participates in a secondary financial protection system under which it is subject to retrospective assessments of up to $317 million per incident at any nuclear utility reactor in the United States, payable at a rate not to exceed $40 million per incident per year.
FPL participates in insurance pools and other arrangements that provide $2.75 billion of limited insurance coverage for property damage, decontamination and premature decommissioning risks at its nuclear plants. The proceeds from such insurance, however, must first be used for reactor stabilization and site decontamination before they can be used for plant repair. FPL also participates in an insurance program that provides limited coverage for replacement power costs if a plant is out of service because of an accident. In the event of an accident at one of FPL's or another participating insured's nuclear plant, FPL could be assessed up to $58 million in retrospective premiums, and in the event of a subsequent accident at such
nuclear plants during the policy period, the maximum assessment is $72 million under the programs in effect at December 31, 1993. This contingent liability would be partially offset by a portion of FPL's storm and property insurance reserve (storm fund), which totaled $82 million at that date.
In the event of a catastrophic loss at one of FPL's nuclear plants, the amount of insurance available may not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses, to the extent not recovered through rates, would be borne by FPL and could have a material adverse effect on FPL Group's and FPL's financial condition.
In 1993, FPL replaced its transmission and distribution (T&D) property insurance coverage with a self-insurance program due to the high cost and limited coverage available from third-party insurers. Costs incurred under the self-insurance program will be charged against FPL's storm fund. Recovery of any losses in excess of the storm fund from ratepayers will require the approval of the FPSC. FPL's available lines of credit include $300 million to provide additional liquidity in the event of a T&D property loss.
Contracts - FPL has take-or-pay contracts with the Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA) for 374 megawatts (mw) through 2023 and with the subsidiaries of the Southern Company to purchase 1,406 mw of power through May 1994, and declining amounts thereafter through mid-2010. FPL also has various firm pay-for-performance contracts to purchase 1,031 mw from certain cogenerators and small power producers (qualifying facilities) with expiration dates ranging from 2002 through 2026. These contracts provide for capacity and energy payments. Capacity payments for the pay-for-performance contracts are subject to the qualifying facilities meeting certain contract obligations. Energy payments are based on the actual power taken under these contracts.
The required capacity payments through 1998 under these contracts are estimated to be as follows:
FPL's capacity and energy charges under these contracts for 1993, 1992 and 1991 were as follows:
(1) Recovered through base rates and the capacity cost recovery clause (capacity clause). (2) Recovered through the capacity clause. (3) Recovered through the fuel and purchased power cost recovery clause. (4) Recoverable through base rates.
FPL has take-or-pay contracts for the supply and transportation of natural gas under which it is required to make payments estimated to be $280 million for 1994, $380 million for 1995 and $390 million for each of the years 1996, 1997 and 1998. Total payments made under these contracts were $270 million, $269 million and $221 million for 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
Litigation - Union Carbide Corporation sued FPL and Florida Power Corporation alleging that, through a territorial agreement approved by the FPSC, they conspired to eliminate competition in violation of federal antitrust laws. Praxair, Inc., an entity that was formerly a unit of Union Carbide, has been substituted as the plaintiff. The suit seeks treble damages of an unspecified amount based on alleged higher prices paid for electricity and product sales lost. Cross motions for summary judgement were denied. Both parties are appealing the denials.
A suit brought by the partners in a cogeneration project located in Dade County, Florida, alleges that FPL Group, FPL and ESI have engaged in anti-competitive conduct intended to eliminate competition from cogenerators generally, and from their facility in particular, in violation of federal antitrust laws and have wrongfully interfered with the cogeneration project's contractual relationship with Metropolitan Dade County. The suit seeks damages in excess of $100 million, before trebling under antitrust law, plus other unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. A motion for summary judgment by FPL Group, FPL and ESI has been denied.
A former cable installation contractor for Telesat Cablevision, Inc. (an indirect subsidiary of FPL Group) has sued FPL Group, FPL Group Capital and Telesat for breach of contract, fraud and violation of racketeering statutes. The suit seeks compensatory damages in excess of $24 million, treble damages under racketeering activity statutes, punitive damages and attorneys' fees, as well as the revocation of Telesat's corporate charter and cable television franchises.
FPL Group believes that it and its subsidiaries have meritorious defenses to all of the litigation described above and is vigorously defending these suits. Accordingly, the liabilities, if any, arising from this litigation are not anticipated to have a material adverse effect on FPL Group's financial statements.
13. Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
Condensed consolidated quarterly financial information for 1993 and 1992 is as follows:
(1) In the opinion of FPL Group, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring accruals necessary to present a fair statement of such amounts for such periods, have been made. Results of operations for an interim period may not give a true indication of results for the calendar year. (2) Charge resulting from cost reduction program reduced operating income by $138 million, net income by $85 million and earnings per share by $0.45. See Note 4.
Item 9.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
PART III
Item 10.

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information required by this Item will be included in FPL Group's Definitive Proxy Statement which will be filed with the SEC in connection with the 1994 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (FPL Group's Proxy Statement) and is incorporated herein by reference, or is included in Part I under Executive Officers of the Registrant.
Item 11.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item will be included in FPL Group's Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference, provided that the Compensation Committee Report and Performance Graphs which are contained in FPL Group's Proxy Statement shall not be deemed to be incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this Item will be included in FPL Group's Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this Item will be included in FPL Group's Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
Item 14.

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements Page(s)
Independent Auditors' Report 15 Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 16 Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1993 and 1992 17-18 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 19 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991 20-35
2. Financial Statement Schedules(1)
Schedule V Property, Plant and Equipment 39-40 Schedule VI Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization of Property, Plant and Equipment 41-42 Schedule IX Short-Term Borrowings 43 Schedule X Supplementary Income Statement Information 44
(1) All other schedules are omitted as not applicable or not required.
3. Exhibits including those Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number Description
*3(i) Restated Articles of Incorporation of FPL Group dated December 31, 1984, as amended through December 17, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 4(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
3(ii) Bylaws of FPL Group dated November 15, 1993
*4(a) Rights Agreement, dated as of June 16, 1986, between FPL Group, Inc. and the First National Bank of Boston (filed as Exhibit 4(e) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*4(b) Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of January 1, 1944, and Ninety-four Supplements thereto between FPL and Bankers Trust Company and The Florida National Bank of Jacksonville (now First Union National Bank of Florida), Trustees (as of September 2, 1992, the sole trustee is Bankers Trust Company) (filed as Exhibit B-3, File No. 2-4845; Exhibit 7(a), File No. 2-7126; Exhibit 7(a), File No. 2-7523; Exhibit 7(a), File No. 2-7990; Exhibit 7(a), File No. 2-9217; Exhibit 4(a)-5, File No. 2-10093; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-11491; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-12900; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-13255; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-13705; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-13925; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-15088; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-15677; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-20501; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-22104; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-23142; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-24195; Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-25677; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-27612; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-29001; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-30542; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-33038; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-37679; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-39006; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-41312; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-44234; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-46502; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-48679; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-49726; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-50712; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-52826; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-53272; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-54242; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-56228; Exhibits 2(c) and 2(d), File No. 2-60413; Exhibits 2(c) and 2(d), File No. 2-65701; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-66524; Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-67239; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-69716; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-70767; Exhibit 4(b), File No. 2-71542; Exhibit 4(b), File No. 2-73799; Exhibits 4(c), 4(d) and 4(e), File No. 2-75762; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-77629; Exhibit 4(c), File No. 2-79557; Exhibit 99(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669; Exhibit 99(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3, File No. 33-46076); and Exhibit 4(b) to Form 10-K dated March 21, 1994, File No. 1-3545).
*10(a) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated (filed as Exhibit 99(b) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(b) Benefit Restoration Plan of FPL Group and affiliates, as amended and restated (filed as Exhibit 99(c) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(c) FPL Group Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for J. L. Broadhead (filed as Exhibit 99(d) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(d) Employment Agreement between FPL Group and D. P. Coyle dated June 12, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 99(e) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(e) Employment Agreement between FPL and Stephen E. Frank dated July 31, 1990 (filed as Exhibit 99(f) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(f) Employment Agreement between FPL and Jerome H. Goldberg dated August 9, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 99(g) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(g) FPL Group Long-Term Incentive Plan of 1985, as amended (filed as Exhibit 99(h) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(h) Director and Executive Compensation Deferral Plan of FPL, as amended (filed as Exhibit 99(i) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
*10(i) Employment Agreement between FPL Group and James L. Broadhead dated February 13, 1989 (filed as Exhibit 99(j) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Form S-8, File No. 33-18669)
10(j) Employment Agreement between FPL Group and James L. Broadhead dated as of December 13,
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23 Independent Auditors' Consent
* Incorporated herein by reference
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
(1) A Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 22, 1993 was filed October 22, 1993 reporting one event under Item 5. Other Events.
SCHEDULE V
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULE V
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Concluded)
SCHEDULE VI
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
SCHEDULE VI
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Concluded)
(1) Depreciation of transportation equipment is charged to various accounts based on the use of such equipment. Amortization of nuclear fuel assemblies is charged to fuel, purchased power and interchange expense. (2) This reserve is maintained for all depreciable property. The amount in the retirements column is net of removal costs and salvage. (3) Includes fossil decommissioning reserves of $102 million, $92 million and $83 million at December 31, 1993, 1992 and 1991, respectively.
SCHEDULE IX
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
(1) Represents the maximum amount outstanding at any month end. (2) Computed by dividing the sum of the daily ending balances by the number of days in the year. (3) Computation is based upon the principal amounts weighted by the number of days outstanding.
SCHEDULE X
FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES SUPPLEMENTARY INCOME STATEMENT INFORMATION (1)
(1) Other information required by Article 5, Schedule X - Supplementary Income Statement Information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto, or is not presented as such amounts are less than 1% of total revenues.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 21, 1994 FPL Group, Inc.
By JAMES L. BROADHEAD James L. Broadhead (Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Director)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature Title Date
PAUL J. EVANSON Principal Financial Officer Paul J. Evanson (Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer)
K. MICHAEL DAVIS Principal Accounting Officer K. Michael Davis (Controller and Chief Accounting Officer)
March 21, 1994
H. JESSE ARNELLE H. Jesse Arnelle
ROBERT M. BEALL, II Directors Robert M. Beall, II
DAVID BLUMBERG David Blumberg
Signature Title Date
J. HYATT BROWN J. Hyatt Brown
MARSHALL M. CRISER Marshall M. Criser
JEAN MCARTHUR DAVIS Jean McArthur Davis
BEVERLY F. DOLAN Beverly F. Dolan Directors March 21, 1994
WILLARD D. DOVER Willard D. Dover
ALFONSO FANJUL Alfonso Fanjul
STEPHEN E. FRANK Stephen E. Frank
DREW LEWIS Drew Lewis
FREDERIC V. MALEK Frederic V. Malek
PAUL R. TREGURTHA Paul R. Tregurtha