To be under the gun means to be in a stressful situation that requires quick action, but this context is saying that such thinking is not dangerous when technologies are involved
Context: That might be typical corporate thinking when you were relaxed and not under any pressure or stress, but with technologies like these it was dangerous as hell.
Hypothesis: That might be typical corporate thinking when you were under the gun, but with technologies like these it was dangerous as hell.

Given this context, is the hypothesis true (Yes/No/I don't know)?