Just because the child is being held, doesn't mean he's being held by his father. Just because the baby is crying, doesn't mean it's because he's just awoken from a nap. Child doesn't necessarily imply son.


Context: "An asian child in a baseball cap crying while he is being held"
Hypothesis: A father holds his upset son who has awoken from a nap.
Based on the context, is the hypothesis true, false, or unknown?