The Government has announced its review of employment tribunal fees, which it says will result in recommendations for any changes to fee structure and levels.
Since July 2013, workers in the UK have been charged a fee to bring a claim to an employment tribunal, with a further fee if the claim is heard and another charge if they want to appeal the decision.
Employment tribunal fees
Employment tribunal fees vary depending on the complexity of the case.
For example, to bring a discrimination claim, workers must pay an initial fee of £250 to issue a claim and a further fee of £950 if the claim proceeds to a hearing.
Claimants can apply for remission of the whole or part of a fee if they cannot afford to pay.
Tribunals can order fees to be repaid if the claim is successful.
The terms of reference for the review promise an examination of:
- employment tribunal data on volume of cases, case progression and case outcomes;
- research on the views of court and tribunal users;
- the general trend in the number of cases appearing at employment tribunals;
- any consequences arising as a result of an improved economy on the number of employees being dismissed;
- to what extent weak or unmeritorious claims have been discouraged by employment tribunal fees; and
- if there has been any impact because of changes in employment law.
When tribunal fees were introduced, the Government’s stated aim was to reduce the number of frivolous claims and to help employers avoid costly legal fees handling grievances that could be dealt with away from employment tribunals.
However, employment tribunal fees have come in for heavy criticism for pricing workers who are treated unfairly out of access to justice.
The employment tribunal fees system has also been the subject of a legal challenge from Unison.
In February 2014, the trade union’s first challenge was unsuccessful, with the High Court stressing that it was too early at that point (around six months after the fee scheme was introduced) to judge the effectiveness and impact of employment tribunal fees.
In December 2014, a second challenge came before the High Court, with Unison allowed to introduce new statistical information suggesting that certain vulnerable groups, such as single mothers, would be particularly disadvantaged by employment tribunal fees.
However, this case also failed. Unison has appealed and the Court of Appeal is due to hear the case later in June.
Stephen Simpson, principal employment law editor at XpertHR, said: “This review has been promised for a while, and it’s no surprise that the announcement has been timed to appear shortly before Unison’s latest challenge to tribunal fees is heard in the Court of Appeal, which is sure to get a lot of publicity.
“On the same day as the review was announced, the Government published the latest quarterly statistics on employment tribunal claims received, covering January to March 2015. I always look at the number of unfair dismissal claims first, as they give a good indication as anything of the state of play.
“The unfair dismissal figures tell their own story: in the first quarter of 2015, 3,065 claims were brought, compared with 11,041 in the same quarter in 2013.”
The review is expected to be completed later in 2015.
The text provides information about the UK government's review of employment tribunal fees, including the fee structure, the purpose of the fees, and the criticism they have received. It also mentions a legal challenge by Unison and provides statistics on the number of unfair dismissal claims before and after the introduction of the fees.
no_question
Given a text passage, determine:
    1. If it contains a mathematical question (including word problems or calculations)
    2. If an answer to that mathematical question is provided in the text

First, describe the content structure you found in 1-2 sentences.

Then provide your analysis in the following format:
TYPE: <one of the following values>
- NO_QUESTION
- SINGLE_QUESTION
- SINGLE_QUESTION_WITH_ANSWER
- MULTIPLE_QUESTIONS
- MULTIPLE_QUESTIONS_WITH_ANSWERS
system
The Government has announced its review of employment tribunal fees, which it says will result in recommendations for any changes to fee structure and levels.
Since July 2013, workers in the UK have been charged a fee to bring a claim to an employment tribunal, with a further fee if the claim is heard and another charge if they want to appeal the decision.
Employment tribunal fees
Employment tribunal fees vary depending on the complexity of the case.
For example, to bring a discrimination claim, workers must pay an initial fee of £250 to issue a claim and a further fee of £950 if the claim proceeds to a hearing.
Claimants can apply for remission of the whole or part of a fee if they cannot afford to pay.
Tribunals can order fees to be repaid if the claim is successful.
The terms of reference for the review promise an examination of:
- employment tribunal data on volume of cases, case progression and case outcomes;
- research on the views of court and tribunal users;
- the general trend in the number of cases appearing at employment tribunals;
- any consequences arising as a result of an improved economy on the number of employees being dismissed;
- to what extent weak or unmeritorious claims have been discouraged by employment tribunal fees; and
- if there has been any impact because of changes in employment law.
When tribunal fees were introduced, the Government’s stated aim was to reduce the number of frivolous claims and to help employers avoid costly legal fees handling grievances that could be dealt with away from employment tribunals.
However, employment tribunal fees have come in for heavy criticism for pricing workers who are treated unfairly out of access to justice.
The employment tribunal fees system has also been the subject of a legal challenge from Unison.
In February 2014, the trade union’s first challenge was unsuccessful, with the High Court stressing that it was too early at that point (around six months after the fee scheme was introduced) to judge the effectiveness and impact of employment tribunal fees.
In December 2014, a second challenge came before the High Court, with Unison allowed to introduce new statistical information suggesting that certain vulnerable groups, such as single mothers, would be particularly disadvantaged by employment tribunal fees.
However, this case also failed. Unison has appealed and the Court of Appeal is due to hear the case later in June.
Stephen Simpson, principal employment law editor at XpertHR, said: “This review has been promised for a while, and it’s no surprise that the announcement has been timed to appear shortly before Unison’s latest challenge to tribunal fees is heard in the Court of Appeal, which is sure to get a lot of publicity.
“On the same day as the review was announced, the Government published the latest quarterly statistics on employment tribunal claims received, covering January to March 2015. I always look at the number of unfair dismissal claims first, as they give a good indication as anything of the state of play.
“The unfair dismissal figures tell their own story: in the first quarter of 2015, 3,065 claims were brought, compared with 11,041 in the same quarter in 2013.”
The review is expected to be completed later in 2015.
user
The text provides information about the UK government's review of employment tribunal fees, including the fee structure, the purpose of the fees, and the criticism they have received. It also mentions a legal challenge by Unison and provides statistics on the number of unfair dismissal claims before and after the introduction of the fees.

TYPE: NO_QUESTION