Dual Catalysis Strategies in Photochemical Synthesis
The interaction between an electronically excited photocatalyst and an organic molecule can result in the genertion of a diverse array of reactive intermediates that can be manipulated in a variety of ways to result in synthetically useful bond constructions. This review summarizes dual catalyst strategies that have been applied to synthetic photochemistry. Mechanistically distinct modes of photocatalysis are discussed, including photoinduced electron transfer, hydrogen atom transfer, and energy transfer. We focus upon the cooperative interactions of photocatalysts with redox mediators, Lewis and Br\xc3\xb8nsted acids, organocatalysts, enzymes, and transition metal complexes.
1. Introduction<!>1.1 Mechanisms of Photocatalysis<!>1.2 Organization and Scope of the Review<!>2. Photoinduced Electron Transfer<!>2.1 Redox Mediation<!><!>2.1 Redox Mediation<!>2.1.1 Photooxygenation<!>2.1.2 Alkene Oxidation<!>2.1.3 Heteroatom Oxidation<!>2.1.4 Oxidative Rearrangement<!>2.1.5 Photoreduction<!>2.2 Lewis Acid Catalysis<!>2.2.1 Substrate\xe2\x80\x93Lewis Acid Interactions<!>2.2.2 Photocatalyst\xe2\x80\x93Lewis Acid Interactions<!>2.2.3 Lewis Acid Catalysis of Non-Redox Steps<!>2.3 Br\xc3\xb8nsted Acid/Base Catalysis<!>2.3.1 Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer (PCET)<!>2.3.2 Br\xc3\xb8nsted Acid Catalysis of Non-Redox Steps<!>2.4 Organocatalysis<!>2.4.1 Enamine/Iminium Catalysis<!>2.4.2 Hydrogen Atom Transfer (HAT) Catalysis<!>2.4.3 Other Modes of Organocatalysis<!>2.5 Transition Metal Catalysis<!>2.5.1 Catalysis of Redox Steps<!>2.5.2 Catalysis of Downstream Steps<!>2.6. Enzymatic Catalysis<!>3. Photoinduced Hydrogen Atom Transfer<!>4. Photoinduced Energy Transfer<!>4.1 Transition Metal Catalysis<!>4.2. Organocatalysis<!>4.3 Br\xc3\xb8nsted Acid Catalysis<!>5. Conclusion and Outlook
<p>Catalysis has played a central role in the development of all major areas of contemporary synthetic chemistry. A remarkably diverse range of catalyst structures, both metal-based and purely organic, have been developed to increase the rate and practicality of important chemical transformations. These entities are capable of providing high levels of control over the stereo- and regioselectivity of complexity-building reactions, and — perhaps most importantly — enabling novel bond constructions that can only be achieved using catalysis.</p><p>In the context of synthetic organic photochemistry, photocatalysts play a unique but no less critical role. The interaction of simple organic molecules with light is generally weak. Moreover, electronically excited states are often only available upon irradiation with quite short wavelengths of ultraviolet (UV) light. These high-energy photons can cause uncontrolled photodecomposition processes to occur, a factor that has limited the broad utility of photochemical synthesis in the construction of complex organic molecules. In contrast, photocatalysts are powerfully enabling in synthetic applications because they absorb light with greater efficiency and at longer wavelengths than do simple organic small molecules. These species operate by converting the energy of an absorbed photon into chemical potential that can be used to transform organic substrates in a multitude of ways. Photocatalysis provides a direct means to access the chemistry of reactive intermediates that often cannot readily be generated using other non-photochemical strategies. Thus, many of the most practical synthetic strategies involving radical ions, diradicals, and electronically excited organic compounds rely upon the use of photocatalysts.</p><p>An intriguing synergy emerges when photocatalysis is combined with other, non-photochemical catalytic strategies. In these dual-catalyst systems, one catalyst is used to absorb light and activate organic substrates, and a second, independent catalyst species is used to further manipulate the reactivity of the resulting photogenerated intermediates. In the past several years, the synthetic chemistry community's interest in photocatalysis has enjoyed tremendous growth, and one of the most remarkable emerging features in this body of recent literature is the frequency with which dual catalysis approaches are utilized. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the ways in which co-catalyst strategies have been applied to synthesis, covering both contemporary developments in organic photochemistry and the important precedents that paved the way for the recent surge of renewed interest in photocatalytic synthesis.</p><!><p>The interaction between an electronically excited photocatalyst and an organic molecule can result in the generation of a diverse array of reactive intermediates. By taking advantage of the distinctive chemistry of each, a wide range of powerful complexity-building synthetic transformations has been developed.1 To provide a conceptual framework for discussing the impact of co-catalysis on the reactivity of these varied intermediates, we have organized this review around three common photocatalytic activation steps.</p><p>First, much of the recent renewal of interest in photochemical synthesis has been based upon the propensity of photoexcited molecules to participate in electron-transfer (or "photoredox") processes.2 A molecule in an electronically excited state is both a stronger oxidant as well as a stronger reductant than its ground state analog. Thus, one common class of photochemically initiated reactions involves activation via either a one-electron oxidation or one-electron reduction of an organic substrate by the photocatalyst (Scheme 1A). The resulting organic radical ion species can directly react in a number of different bond-forming reactions. Alternatively, the radical ion can undergo mesolytic fragmentation to afford separate radical and ionic intermediates, either of which can be productively intercepted in synthetic transformations.</p><p>Second, radical intermediates can also result from the reaction of excited state photocatalysts via direct hydrogen atom abstraction, rather than by stepwise electron transfer and bond scission as independent processes (Scheme 1B). This is a characteristic reaction of photoexcited aromatic ketones such as benzophenone or acetophenone.3 More recently, polyoxometalates have also been exploited as photocatalysts for this mechanism of photoactivation as well.4 The distinction between electron and hydrogen atom transfer mechanisms is an important one for a number of reasons. Among the most critical is the identity of the thermodynamic parameters that best determine the feasibility of the activation step; while for photoredox activation the success of electron transfer is governed by the redox potentials of the substrate and excited photocatalyst, in hydrogen atom transfer reactions, the bond strength is typically more predictive.</p><p>Third, electronically excited photocatalysts can also activate an organic substrate via energy transfer (Scheme 1C).5 The transfer of excited state energy from a photocatalyst to an organic substrate can occur through one of several mechanisms, but the most common in synthetic applications is Dexter energy transfer. This can be conceptualized as the bilateral electron exchange between the excited-state photocatalyst and an organic substrate, resulting in the non-radiative relaxation of the photocatalyst coupled to the simultaneous generation of an excited state substrate. For this process to be efficient, transfer of excited state energy from the photocatalyst to the substrate must be thermodynamically feasible. Photosensitization of reactions via this mode of activation is quite common in synthesis; however, the lifetime of the resulting electronically excited substrates is generally quite short. Thus strategies to use exogenous catalysts to manipulate their reactivity have been substantially more challenging to develop.</p><p>Several of the most common photocatalysts used in synthetic applications are shown in Figure 1. The structures of this family of catalysts are dominated by highly conjugated systems, as one might expect for a class of molecules designed to interact with light. Beyond this trivial similarity, however, a cursory glance at these compounds reveals their remarkable diversity. These include simple aromatic chromophores, both neutral and charged, functionalized organic dyes, inorganic clusters, and transition metal complexes whose properties can be easily tuned by ligand modification. The availability of diverse photocatalyst structures that span a broad range of triplet energies and redox potentials is an important benefit of photocatalytic synthesis; the appropriate choice of photocatalyst can be used to control the mechanistic outcome of many reactions where direct substrate photoexcitation might lead unselectively to multiple reaction pathways.</p><p>Because this diverse collection of photocatalyst structures nevertheless operate by only a few fundamentally distinct mechanisms of photoactivation, we have elected to organize the material in this review broadly based upon the mode by which the photoacatalyst acts; that is, by electron transfer (Section 2), by hydrogen atom abstraction (Section 3), or by energy transfer (Section 4). However, these various photoactivation processes often lead to similar open-shelled reactive intermediates, and because of the short lifetimes of the species involved, it is often difficult to unambiguously determine which mechanism of photoactivation is operative in a given transformation. The mechanisms provided herein reflect the best reasonable hypotheses of the publishing authors, and we present them as such. Given the understandable focus of the field on synthetic advances, experimental validation of several frequently invoked phenomena such as the persistent radical effect6–8 and the relative contribution of closed catalytic versus radical propagative pathways9 has not yet been performed for the majority of these reactions. Thus, certain details may be revised as the community's mechanistic understanding expands.</p><!><p>Synthetic organic photochemistry, like many interdisciplinary fields, is informed by the language and culture of several independent scholarly traditions. One significant challenge in interpreting this literature is the existence of a multitude of competing definitions of common terms such as "catalysis" that are used in different communities.10–13 Can templating moieties that interact with the substrate only via non-covalent interactions be considered "catalysts?" Must a "catalyst" be used sub-stoichiometrically? It might be possible to mount a compelling argument that some of these definitions are more useful than others. However, for the purposes of this review, we will consider an entity a catalyst if it increases the macroscopic rate of the organic transformation in question while neither being formed nor consumed in the balanced reaction.</p><p>We have limited this discussion herein to the use of well-defined small-molecule photocatalysts and co-catalysts in the construction of complex organic molecules. This restriction unfortunately omits the substantial body of work involving semiconductor photocatalysis14–17 as well as the study of photochemical reactions in supramolecular hosts.18–21 These two themes of research within synthetic photochemistry are quite extensive, and while we cannot adequately cover them here, a number of excellent, comprehensive reviews on both fields are available. Earlier reviews covering the concept of molecular photocatalysis in synthetic applications have also been published, focusing upon carbon–carbon bond forming reactions,22–29 the synthesis of natural products or complex molecular scaffolds,30–34 as well as asymmetric synthesis.35–38 The application of both transition metal39–43 and organic photocatalysts44–46 has also been discussed previously. Finally, we note that an excellent tutorial review on photochemical dual-catalyst strategies was recently published by Glorius, focusing on the revival of visible light photoredox catalysis over the past decade.47</p><!><p>The emergence of useful redox properties in the excited state is a common feature of molecular chromophores. Photoinduced promotion of an electron from the molecule's HOMO to its LUMO results in the formation of an electronically excited state that can formally be conceptualized as a charge-separated electron–hole pair. If the lifetime of this excited state is sufficiently long to engage in subsequent intermolecular reactions, it can either donate its high-energy electron to an appropriate acceptor (A) or fill its partially occupied orbital from a suitable electron donor (D). Thus, by virtue of having an electron–hole pair, an excited photocatalyst can engage in both reductive and oxidative chemistry and is typically both a stronger reductant and a stronger oxidant than its ground state counterpart. As a result, a commonly exploited feature of a photocatalytic species is its ability to convert the energy of an incident photon into synthetically useful electrochemical potential.</p><p>Figure 2 outlines the generalized photoredox processes available to a photocatalyst. Absorption of a photon results in the generation of an electronically excited state; this can undergo relaxation back to the ground state via a number of unimolecular emissive and non-emissive pathways at relatively rapid rates. The redox properties of the excited state, however, can be exploited upon fast electron transfer to an electron-deficient acceptor species (A) or from an electron-rich donor species (D). These species are referred to as oxidative and reductive quenchers, respectively, because they result in the formation of a different oxidation state of a photocatalyst in its electronic ground state configuration. Regeneration of the photochemically active state requires a second electron-transfer process from a complementary donor or acceptor species. Thus photoredox catalysis typically results in a formal transfer of an electron from one reagent to another, which produces a pair of reactive radical ions comprising the oxidized donor (D•+) and reduced acceptor (A•−).</p><p>Both radical cations and radical anions exhibit intriguing, synthetically useful reactivity that is often not available to closed-shell organic molecules.48–57 However, in photoredox catalysis, it is relatively rare for both radical ion equivalents to be simultaneously engaged in the same organic transformation. More commonly, a single synthetically relevant organic substrate is activated by photoinduced electron transfer, and a balancing redox equivalent is independently introduced to the reaction. There are two mechanistic scenarios by which this can occur. First, the substrate may directly quench the excited state of the photocatalyst, in which case the balancing redox equivalent is required to regenerate the photocatalyst (Figure 3A). This pathway is viable when electron transfer between the substrate and the excited photocatalyst is thermodynamically feasible. When it is not, however, the excited state can also be engaged by a secondary quencher (Figure 3B). This produces an oxidized or reduced ground-state catalyst that is more powerfully redox-active than the excited state and thus capable of performing a broader range of electron-transfer processes. Interaction with the substrate generates the corresponding substrate radical ion and returns the catalyst to its resting state. Prototypical oxidative quenchers include pyridinium salts, quinones, and nitroarenes. Reductive quenching is typically carried out by electron rich tertiary amines, sulfides, or phosphines. The kinetics of these quenching processes with a variety of photocatalytic species have been extensively documented.58</p><p>Co-catalysts can be used to influence photoredox transformations by mediating the electron transfer, by independently generating an intermediate species that undergoes photocatalytic activation in situ, or by controlling a reactive intermediate downstream of the photoinduced electron transfer process itself. The first strategy (redox mediation) constitutes the largest body of research and is treated separately (Section 2.1). The remainder of this section is organized according to the identity of the co-catalyst (Sections 2.2–2.6).</p><!><p>The feasibility of a given photoredox activation step is primarily determined by the relative half cell potentials of the photocatalyst and substrate, respectively. In general, synthetically useful photoredox reactions have been designed around exergonic electron transfer processes. However, the kinetics of electron transfer are also important; many PET processes that are thermodynamically favorable are nevertheless kinetically too slow to be useful. In addition, photoredox reactions involving modestly endergonic electron transfer are possible, although Marcus theory considerations predict slow rates of reaction for these processes. A common strategy to address either of these situations is the use of a redox mediator.</p><p>The redox mediator is a particular type of quencher that undergoes redox processes with both the photocatalyst and the substrate in separate electron transfer events (Figure 4). These co-catalysts are commonly referred to in the photochemistry literature as co-sensitizers, and occasionally as electron mediators, redox photosensitizers, redox catalysts, electron relays, or electron transfer agents.59–62 There are three main mechanistic scenarios in which a redox mediator may increase the rate of a reaction. For a hypothetical oxidative reaction, these are as follows:</p><!><p>The most straightforward use of redox mediators is for transformations in which direct oxidation of the substrate by the photocatalyst is exergonic, but inefficient rates of electron transfer result in a slow overall reaction. In this case, the appropriate choice of a redox mediator that reacts rapidly with both PC* and the substrate can mitigate the unfavorable kinetics of the direct electron transfer process.</p><p>Redox mediators can also be beneficial in reactions that involve endergonic PET. Although the electron transfer from RM•+ to the substrate must also be endergonic, it is kinetically more feasible than direct quenching because RM•+ is in its electronic ground state configuration and thus has a significantly longer lifetime than PC*.</p><p>Finally, a redox mediator may aid in generation of a solvent separated ion pair.63–66 One common source of low quantum efficiency is the occurrence of back electron transfer (BET) before the intimate ion pair arising from collisional electron transfer (PCn−1•sub•+) can diffuse apart. A redox mediator may undergo BET more slowly and thus escape the solvent cage more efficiently. Subsequent electron transfer from the substrate to RM•+ results in the same reactive species but as a solvent separated ion pair (PCn−1 + sub•+) that is more resistant to BET.</p><!><p>Common photocatalyst/redox mediator pairs such as 9,10-dicyanoanthracene (DCA, 2) and biphenyl (BP, 18) are often employed with little discussion of which mechanistic scenario is operative.67–70 As such, this section is organized by transformation, but we will attempt to highlight these mechanistic distinctions where possible.</p><!><p>One of the most prolific areas of study for this type of co-catalysis is the photooxygenation of cycloalkanes and small saturated heterocycles.71 In the 1980s, the Schaap group discovered that biphenyl provided a dramatic rate increase to the DCA-catalyzed oxidation of cyclopropanes,72 epoxides,73–76 and aziridines.77 For example, the photooxygenation of epoxide 19 to 20 is a slow reaction upon photocatalysis using DCA alone (Scheme 2). However, addition of 10 mol% biphenyl (BP) decreased the reaction time to 2 h, and complete conversion could be achieved in just 10 min using a stoichiometric loading of BP. The proposed explanation for this effect was in line with mechanistic situation II (Section 2.1). Substrate 19 is an ineffective quencher of DCA*, whereas BP quenches rapidly (kq = 3.1 × 109 M−1s−1). Secondary electron transfer from BP•+ to 19 is endergonic, but still kinetically feasible due to the long lifetime of BP•+ relative to DCA*.</p><p>The photooxygenation of cyclopropanes exhibited similar rate increases in the presence of biphenyl (Scheme 3), though a different mechanistic rationale was proposed.72,77 Although substrate 22 quenches DCA* at close to a diffusion-controlled rate (kq = 1.1 × 1010 M−1s−1), the rate of formation of photooxygenated products 23 and 24 are nevertheless increased 10-fold upon the addition of biphenyl. This observation is most consistent with mechanistic scenario III. Rapid PET results in the formation of a contact ion pair (DCA•−•22•+), and escape from the solvent cage is inefficient with respect to the rate of back electron transfer. In contrast, while BP quenches the photoexcited catalyst more slowly, BP•+ can undergo more efficient dissociation. Subsequent electron transfer to this redox mediator affords the solvent separated (DCA•− + 22•+) ion pair, which can more readily react with oxygen to afford the endoperoxide.</p><p>Similar effects were observed in the photooxygenation of diarylcyclopropanes,78 vinylcyclopropanes,79–81 and 8-methoxypsoralen.82 In each case, DCA* is quenched more efficiently by the substrate than by BP, but the addition of redox mediator nevertheless accelerates the overall rate of reaction. Tamai et al. quantified this effect in a study of the photoisomerization and photooxygenation of 1,2-diphenylcyclopropane 25.83,84 The addition of various polyphenylene redox mediators such as biphenyl, terphenyl, and phenanthrene was shown to result in an increase in the quantum yield for separation of RM•+ and DCA•− (Scheme 4).</p><!><p>Alkene radical cations have immense versatility in organic synthesis. They can readily participate in nucleophilic additions,51,85 cyclizations,52,86 cycloadditions,48,49,51,57 fragmentations,54 and rearrangement processes.53,86 Photoredox catalysis offers a convenient method to generate these reactive intermediates, and redox mediation has been frequently utilized in tandem with photocatalysis to maximize the rate of reaction.</p><p>One of the earliest examples of this strategy was reported by Farid in the dimerization of phenyl vinyl ether 29 (Scheme 5) using 9-cyanoanthracene (9-CA) as a photocatalyst.87 Direct quenching of [9-CA]* by 29 is endergonic and too slow to be measured. Consistent with this inefficient electron transfer, the dimerization reaction proceeds with low quantum yield (Φ = 7.3 × 10−3). However, addition of redox mediators such as phenanthrene, alkylnaphthalenes or durene improved the quantum yield, up to 200-fold. This finding is consistent with the production of a long-lived arene radical cation that improves the efficiency by which the alkene radical cation can be generated.</p><p>Gassman reported that a combination of 1-cyanonapthalene (1-CN) and biphenyl could be used to oxidize trisubstituted alkenes such as 31 (Scheme 6). The resultant radical cations could be trapped with oxygen nucleophiles in both intramolecular88,89 and intermolecular90 functionalization reactions. Arnold achieved similar reactivity using diphenylethene substrates.91,92 Silyl enol ethers could also be oxidized and selectively desilylated in the presence of alkyl silyl ethers93 and Hintz et al. later reported a DCA/Phen photocatalytic system for the cyclization of silyl enol ethers with pendant olefins.94 The Roth laboratory observed altered chemoselectivity in the PET cyclization of geraniol, though the influence of the redox mediator was small.95</p><p>Nicewicz reported a conceptually similar strategy in for the [2+2] cycloaddition of styrenes such as 33 using 2,4,6-tris(4-methoxyphenyl)pyrylium tetrafluoroborate (p-MeOTPP+) as a photocatalyst (Scheme 7). Optimal yields of cycloadducts 34 required the addition of aromatic hydrocarbons such as naphthalene or anthracene.96 The authors proposed that the redox mediators improve the rate of substrate oxidation compared to direct quenching.</p><p>Alkene oxidation by PET/redox mediation has also been leveraged for the rearrangement of polyunsaturated compounds such as 2-aza-1,4-dienes97,98 and 1,5-hexadienes,99 as well as tautomerization of styrenes,100 nucleophilic addition to 1,3-dienes,101 and the valence isomerization of norbornadiene.102 Among the most synthetically powerful transformations in this class are the radical cation cascades developed by Warzecha, Demuth, and Görner (Scheme 8). Photocatalytic oxidation of polyene 35 by 1,4-dicyano-2,3,4,5-tetramethylbenzene (TMDCB) resulted in the formation of polycyclic scaffold 36.103–105 In these reactions, biphenyl was employed as a redox mediator, and its role is best explained by the first mechanistic scenario described in Section 2.1.106,107 Stern–Volmer analysis revealed that BP is able to quench [TMDCB]* at rates comparable to the terpene substrates. Furthermore, given its high loading and the long lifetime of BP•+ relative to [TMDCB]*, it dramatically increases the rate of substrate oxidation. Transient absorption spectroscopy also revealed the presence of BP•+ under these conditions, as well as the unexpected result that TMDCB•− may reduce the substrate as well. Subsequent studies showed that other donors such as trans-stilbene or N,N-dimethylaniline were also competent as redox mediators when coupled with 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium tetrafluoroborate (TPP+ BF4−).108 This method was utilized in the synthesis of several steroid natural products.109,110 Furthermore, a remote chiral auxiliary could be used to control the stereochemical outcome of the overall transformation.111–113</p><p>The combination of PET sensitization and redox mediation enables the facile generation of C60•+, a process which has traditionally required γ-irradition. Foote demonstrated that N-methylacridinium hexafluorophosphate (MA+ PF6−) could photocatalytically generate this radical cation, as observed by transient absorption spectroscopy. Addition of biphenyl increased the signal strength of C60•+ by an order of magnitude.114,115 Subsequent work by Mattay and coworkers focused on the reaction of the C60•+ radical cation with alcohols, ethers, and aldehydes using DCA photocatalysis (Scheme 9).116 For instance, the reaction with propionaldehyde 37 affords 38, consistent with a process involving H-atom abstraction by C60•+ followed by attack of the resulting acyl radical 40 on H-C60+
39.117,118</p><!><p>Fagnoni and Albini reported that the photooxidation of organostannane 41 followed by mesolytic fragmentation of the C–Sn bond results in the formation of alkyl radical 44, which subsequently can react with electron-poor acceptors such as 42 to give 43 (Scheme 10).61,119 Although the process can be conducted using single photocatalysts such as 1,4-dicyanonapthalene (DCN) or phenanthrene, the rates were increased in the presence of biphenyl as a redox mediator. Enantioselective, chiral auxiliary controlled versions of this reaction have also been reported.120</p><p>Cumpstey and Crich reported a procedure for photocatalytic glycosylation using selenosugars as donors (Scheme 11).121 Photoxidation of 45 with a N-methylquinolinium photocatalyst (NMQ+ PF6−) results in elimination of the selenyl radical to give glycosyl cation 47, which can in turn be trapped by an alcoholic acceptor moiety to form 46. The reaction was accelerated upon addition of toluene as a co-solvent, which the authors proposed was serving as a redox mediator.</p><p>Steckhan, Blechert, and coworkers used the DCA/BP pair for the functionalization of α-silyl amines,122 ethers, acetals,123 and carbamates.124
Scheme 12 shows that following oxidation and desilylation of 48, α-alkoxy radical 51 can add to alkenes such as 49 to afford 50. The analogous reaction with a single photocatalyst was inefficient, presumably due to rapid BET from DCA•−. As has been discussed previously, the redox mediator helps to form 48•+ free in solution and thus avoid this problem.</p><p>The Yoon laboratory reported a radical thiol–ene reaction initiated by photooxidation of sulfur-containing compounds by Ru(bpz)3(PF6)2 (Scheme 13).125 Several amine additives provided a dramatic rate increase, particularly those such as 54, whose redox potentials were between that of the excited photocatalyst and the thiol substrate. As direct quenching of the photocatalyst by thiol 52 was proposed to be quite slow, the authors suggested that sequential PET events from and to the redox mediator (54) allowed for the increase in reaction rate. This case then falls into the first mechanistic scenario described in Section 2.1, wherein the mediator provides a more kinetically feasible pathway for electron transfer. Boyer subsequently utilized this method for the postsynthetic radical functionalization of polymers.126</p><p>In some cases, redox mediators can alter the distribution of reaction products or otherwise influence the chemoselectivity of a photocatalytic transformation. Whitten studied the oxidative fragmentation of 1,2-aminoalcohols to give aldehydes (Scheme 14) and found that redox mediation with biphenyl improved reaction rates due to its efficient quenching of DCA*.127 Moreover, while photooxidation of syn-56 using DCA alone afforded higher quantum yields than anti-56, both diastereomers underwent cleavage at equivalent efficiencies in the presence of BP. The authors proposed that the former conditions involve the reaction of contact ion pairs while the latter give solvent-separated ion pairs.</p><!><p>Ikeda studied the rearrangement and cycloaddition of methylenecyclopropanes such as 59 under photocatalytic conditions (Scheme 15).128 Transient absorption spectroscopy revealed both diradical 60 and radical cation 61 as intermediates, and their relative concentration could be controlled by photocatalyst identity. Moreover, the addition of redox mediators such as biphenyl or toluene increased the formation of 61 relative to 60. Although the ability of these species to undergo cycloadditions with oxygen to form 62 or with fumarate 63 to form 64 and 65 was examined, the photocatalyst/redox mediator pairs were not directly compared.</p><p>Adam and Sendelbach demonstrated that photooxidation of azoalkane 66 led to extrusion of dinitrogen, followed by ring closure to housane 67, rearrangement to cyclopentene 68, or intramolecular trapping of the pendant alcohol to produce spiroethers 69 and 70 (Scheme 16).129,130 Addition of biphenyl as a redox mediator results in an increase in the rate of reaction and also changes the distribution of products. The authors proposed that BET from DCA•− to 71•+ leads to 1,3-diradical 71, which can rapidly form housane 67. Thus, the DCA-only conditions, proposed to produce a contact radical ion pair from which back-electron transfer is rapid, generate a large amount of this product. In contrast, redox mediation with biphenyl generates 71•+ as a solvent-separated ion pair with DCA•−. The free radical cation intermediate has a lifetime sufficient to undergo 1,2-hydrogen migration to form 72•+, which in turn leads to alkene 68 and spiroethers 69 and 70.</p><p>Yamashita studied the rearrangement of cage ketone 73 catalyzed by 2,4,6-triphenylpyrylium perchlorate (TPP+ ClO4−).131 The proposed mechanism involves oxidation of 73, rearrangement via 74•+ and 75•+, and chain-propagating electron transfer to afford 74 and 75 (Scheme 17). The addition of aromatic hydrocarbons such as biphenyl, phenanthrene, and pyrene resulted in a significant rate increase, consistent with their role as redox mediators. Furthermore, the product distribution proved to be sensitive to the structure of the mediator. Interestingly, the rate increases as the reaction progresses, and based upon quantum yield measurements, the authors suggested that the product (75) can also act as an autocatalytic redox mediator.</p><!><p>While reductive redox mediators are regularly utilized in electrochemical transformations,132–136 they have found relatively few applications in synthetic photoredox chemistry. An interesting example was described by Darwent and Kalyanasundaram (Scheme 18),137 who found that methyl viologen (MV2+) can act as a redox mediator between a Ru(bpy)3Cl2 photocatalyst and benzoquinone 76. Although 76 can quench the photocatalyst directly, a high concentration of superior quencher MV2+ results in the accumulation of MV•+. This in turn can reduce 76 to 76•−, which upon protonation and disproportionation affords phenol 77. More recently, this type of redox mediation has been applied to the Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley-type reduction of ketones, though in this case the viologen is involved in hydride transfer as well as electron transfer.138</p><p>Willner merged this approach with phase transfer catalysis in the reductive dehalogenation of vicinal dibromides (Scheme 19).139–141 In his system, N, N′-dioctyl viologen (C8V2+) is reduced by photoexcited Ru*(bpy)3Cl2. The resultant C8V•+ is lipophilic, and migrates to the organic phase of the reaction mixture, where it can disproportionate to C8V2+ and C8V. The former returns to the aqueous phase to reenter the catalytic cycle, and the latter carries out the two-electron reduction of dibromide 78 to 79. Further work from this group incorporated enzymes as co-catalysts, and will be discussed later (Section 2.6).</p><p>Sawaki reported that the photoreduction and fragmentation of stilbazolium cyclobutane 80 could be carried out with 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene (DMA) as a photocatalyst and 1-CN, DCN, or DCB as redox mediators (Scheme 20).142 The authors postulated that the mediator quenches DMA* and dissociates from the solvent cage to reduce the substrate. The most dramatic increase in quantum yield was observed using 1-CN as the redox mediator, with less pronounced effects using DCN and DCB. The authors attributed this difference to an increased proclivity for the DMA•+•1-CN•− intimate ion pair to undergo dissociation.</p><p>More recently, Tahara and Hisaeda reported a reductive dehalogenation protocol using Rose Bengal as a photocatalyst (Scheme 21).143 In their proposed mechanism, the photoexcited catalyst is quenched by vitamin B12 derivative 83, and the resulting CoI species reduces 82.</p><!><p>The use of Lewis acids to activate heteroatom-containing organic moieties is a ubiquitous strategy in organic synthesis that has found use in a wide variety of applications. Photochemistry is no exception, and the prevalence of ketone and enone functional groups has made this a fertile area for exploration. Coordination of a Lewis acid to heteroatom-containing substrates can impact a number of critical reactivity parameters, including electrophilicity and reduction potential. They can also impact the rate of a reaction by stabilizing a ketyl radical or other photoreduced anionic intermediate.</p><!><p>Abe and Oku studied the pyrene-catalyzed PET reaction between diethyl fumarate 85 and cyclopropane 86 to give crossed product 87 and homodimer 88 (Scheme 22).144 This reaction proceeds only in the presence of Mg(ClO4)2 as a Lewis acidic co-catalyst. The authors proposed that stabilization of allylic ketyl radical 89 by Mg2+ suppresses back electron transfer to the photocatalyst and enables the coupling with 90 to proceed efficiently. Saito and coworkers observed a similar effect of a Mg2+ Lewis acid in the reductive cleavage of the benzoyloxy moiety from 91 (Scheme 23).145</p><p>Pac reported an intriguing example of a Lewis acid effect that does not require precoordination to the substrate. The rate of photoreduction of olefins by Ru(bpy)32+ and a NADH analog enjoys a dramatic increase in the presence of Mg(ClO4)2 (Scheme 24).146 Although the Mg2+ does not exhibit appreciable binding to starting alkene 93, there is a strong stabilizing interaction with the corresponding radical anion 93•−. This interaction thus facilitates the one-electron reduction of the substrate.147</p><p>Mizuno, Nakanishi, and Otsuji also observed that the substitution of dicyanobenzene 1 with group 14 allyl metal species such as 95 became more efficient upon addition of Mg(ClO4)2 (Scheme 25).148 Again, the magnesium salt was proposed to stabilize the radical anion of the substrate and inhibit back electron transfer to the photocatalyst. The resulting complex 97 can combine with an allyl radical to form 98, which then undergoes loss of cyanide and the Lewis acid to provide 96.</p><p>The effect of a Lewis acid on the reduction potential of organic substrates has found use in recent reports of photocatalytic methods as well. The Yoon group has applied this strategy to a variety of photocatalytic cycloaddition reactions. For example, the intrinsic reduction potential of bis(enone) 99 is roughly −1.6 V vs. SCE in DMF,149 which lies outside the range accessible using Ru(bpy)32+ (Scheme 26). However, coordination of LiBF4 to the substrate results in a more positive reduction potential, thereby enabling photoreduction. The resulting allylic ketyl radical 101 is able to engage with the pendant Michael acceptor to afford cyclobutane product 100.150 Intermolecular versions of this reaction have also been developed.151,152</p><p>Because the enone substrates do not absorb in the visible region, no background reaction occurs in the absence of photocatalyst or Lewis acid. Thus, a highly enantioselective [2+2] cycloaddition could be realized using a chiral Eu3+ Lewis acid without any competing racemic process due to direct excitation or uncatalyzed photoreduction (Scheme 27).153</p><p>Similar photoreductive conditions were applied to the [4+2] hetero-Diels–Alder cycloaddition of bis(enone) 106 (Scheme 28).154 In this study, Yoon found empirically that Mg(ClO4)2 was the optimal Lewis acid that balanced the rate of photoreductive activation of the enone substrate and that of an undesired reductive decomposition of the product.</p><p>Yoon utilized a conceptually analogous approach in the design of a [3+2] cycloaddition of acyl cyclopropanes with alkenes, where coordination of a Lewis acid to the ketone modulates the reduction potential of 108. The resultant α-cyclopropyl ketyl radical 110 can undergo ring opening followed by alkene addition and reoxidation to yield [3.3.0]bicyclooctane 109 (Scheme 29).155 In this reaction, LiBF4 was insufficiently Lewis acidic to enable photoreductive activation of the cyclopropyl ketone. Instead, the more strongly Lewis acidic additive La(OTf)3 was found to be the optimal Lewis acid co-catalyst for this transformation. An asymmetric intermolecular variant of this reaction was recently reported.156</p><p>Xia demonstrated that lanthanide Lewis acids are also effective in promoting the reductive dimerization of chalcones using photoredox catalysis (Scheme 30).157 The authors proposed that Sm(OTf)3 facilitates the reduction of 111 and stabilizes the resulting radical anion, which dimerizes to form dienolate 113. The Lewis acid also guides the subsequent cyclization step of 114 to 112. Importantly, this reaction is a net-reductive cyclization reaction and thus differs in an important mechanistic regard from the previous examples of Ru(bpy)32+-catalyzed cycloadditions.</p><p>Lewis acidic metal ions can also be used as templating reagents to recruit and localize Lewis basic substrates. While this strategy is common in many applications involving homogeneous catalysis, few examples related to photocatalytic transformations have been reported. Cibulka, Vasold, and König designed flavin-derived photocatalyst 119 with a tetraamine binding site.158 The latter chelates Mg2+, which in turn coordinates benzyl alcohol 115. By increasing the local concentration of the substrate, the quantum efficiency of photooxidation by the flavin is increased significantly (Scheme 31).</p><!><p>The use of Lewis acids to activate electron-deficient organic substrates towards photocatalytic reduction is a logical co-catalyst strategy that follows from their ability to increase the electrophilicity of a wide range of organic substrates. However, examples of Lewis acid co-catalysis of oxidative photochemical transformations are also known. Neither the organic substrates nor their radical cations would be expected to engage in redox-relevant interactions with a Lewis acid. On the other hand, the radical anion resulting from a reduced photocatalyst can readily be stabilized by a Lewis acid, which could serve to minimize the rate of back electron transfer. The application of this concept to photoinduced electron transfer chemistry has been a topic of investigation for several decades. 66,159–161</p><p>Mizuno discovered that a range of Lewis acids increase the quantum yield for photoisomerization and oxygenation of cyclopropane 121 (Scheme 32).162 One major source of inefficiency in this reaction arises from recombination of the photogenerated ion pair 123, composed of oxidized 121•+ and reduced DCA•−. However, coordination of a Lewis acid to DCA•− is proposed to stabilize the radical anion and decrease the rate of unproductive back electron transfer. A similar strategy has been applied to a number of other transformations, including the photooxygenation of cyclopropanes,78,84,163 disiletenes,164 biphenyls,165,166 and 1,5-dienes,167 as well as the addition of methanol to 1,1-diaryl alkenes.168</p><p>Lewis acids can alter the photoelectrochemical properties of photocatalysts by coordination to heteroatom binding sites in much the same way as they can change the redox potential of Lewis basic organic substrates (Section 2.2.1). Fukuzumi, Kuroda, and Tanaka showed that the excited state oxidation potential of flavin photocatalysts 126 and 127 is increased substantially upon complexation with Mg2+ or Zn2+ ions ( Scheme 33).169 Under these conditions, the oxidation of benzyl alcohol 125 to 128 was achieved in considerably shorter reaction times.170,171</p><!><p>Lewis acid strategies that alter the redox properties of the substrate or photocatalyst or interfere with back electron transfer exert their influence primarily on the dynamics of the electron transfer process itself. These constitute the majority of synthetic applications of photoredox/Lewis acid co-catalysis to date. However, Lewis acids can also have effects on steps that are downstream of the PET step. This can be particularly important when the photogeneration of reactive intermediates is facile but their subsequent reactions are relatively inefficient. For example, Zhu and Rueping recently reported the photocatalytic α-functionalization of glycyl esters (Scheme 34).172 After oxidation of 129, a Zn(OAc)2 co-catalyst decomposes photogenerated hemiaminal intermediate 132; the resulting imine 133 is activated towards nucleophilic addition by indole 130 to afford 131. Cheng and coworkers observed a similar effect, though they proposed a slightly different order of steps.173</p><p>In their study on photocatalytic radical cation cascades using Eosin Y, Yang et al. found that substrates such as 134 did not provide appreciable conversion, presumably due to the low nucleophilicity of the 1,3-diketone terminus. However, the addition of LiBr helped to favor the enol tautomer, allowing facile cyclization to 135 (Scheme 35).174</p><p>Ru(bpy)32+ and other photoredox sensitizers can be used to photooxidatively desilylate α-silylamine 136; the chemistry of the resulting α-amino radical intermediate 139 has been thoroughly investigated.175 While this class of nucleophilic radical is sufficiently reactive to add to Michael acceptors unassisted,176 Yoon found that the rate of the conjugate addition increases significantly upon addition of Lewis acid co-catalysts. In particular, a chiral (pybox)ScIII complex is able accelerate the reaction and control the enantioselectivity of the conjugate addition step (Scheme 36).177</p><!><p>Like Lewis acid coordination, the protonation of organic functional groups can have a similarly diverse range of effects on the redox properties and reactivities of organic substrates. Thus, the use of Brønsted acid co-catalysts in photocatalytic transformations has also emerged as a powerful strategy for novel synthetic methods.</p><!><p>Brønsted acids can catalyze the photoreduction of organic substrates in a manner analogous to Lewis acids. However, in many cases these electron-deficient functional groups possess a pKa too low to result in a significant concentration of protonated substrate. Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) involves the concomitant transfer of a proton and an electron to an organic substrate in a single concerted process. This activation strategy enables the facile generation of radical intermediates that would be kinetically inaccessible via separate proton- and electron-transfer steps. This subject has been reviewed recently,178–180 and we focus here on its applications to photocatalytic synthesis.</p><p>The Knowles laboratory has pioneered the development of synthetic methods that exploit PCET as a means of generating open-shell reactive intermediates. They have shown that aryl ketones are reduced and cyclized using a combination of Brønsted acid and transition metal photoredox catalysts (Scheme 37).181 The authors propose a mechanism wherein photoexcited Ru(bpy)3(BArF)2 is quenched by hydrogen atom donor 142 or 143 to provide RuI; transfer of an electron from this species to the ketone substrate is assisted by a phosphoric acid co-catalalyst (141–H) in a PCET step. The resulting ketyl radical 145 undergoes cyclization to the pendant alkene to 146, followed by hydrogen atom transfer from 142 or 143 and lactonization to afford ester 144. The oxidized hydrogen atom donors 142• or 143• can lose another electron and proton to regenerate the active RuI reductant and the Brønsted acid co-catalyst 141–H. Subsequently, the authors developed an enantioselective addition of photogenerated ketyl radicals to hydrazones in which chiral BINOL-derived phosphoric acid co-catalysts both activated the ketone substrate towards PCET and controlled the stereochemistry of the subsequent radical addition.182</p><p>Yoon and coworkers utilized a similar combination of Brønsted acid and photoredox catalysts in the reductive cyclization of bis(enone) 99 to 147 ( Scheme 38).183 The optimal activating Brønsted acid utilized in this case proved to be formic acid. While the authors did not propose that the photoreduction step involved PCET, the analogy to the ketyl radical cyclization studied by Knowles suggests that the same mechanism of activation is likely to be operative here. Notably, only the identity of the acidic co-catalyst differs from the Lewis acid-catalyzed [2+2] method that the Yoon laboratory reported for the same bis(enone) substrates earlier.150 The authors argued that the chemistry of the neutral radical intermediate generated under Brønsted acid conditions is fundamentally distinct from the reactivity of the radical anion generated under Lewis acidic conditions.</p><p>Fukuzumi and coworkers studied the effect of Brønsted acids on the reductive dehalogenation of phenacyl bromide 148 (Scheme 39).184 They found that addition of HClO4 substantially improves the reaction rate, and engages substrates that are otherwise unreactive, such as phenacyl chlorides. In the absence of acid, the authors propose that photoexcited [Ru*(bpy)3]2+ is reductively quenched by 9,10-dihydro-10-methylacridine (AcrH2) and the resultant RuI species is capable of reducing the α-bromoketone substrate. Direct quenching by the substrate is not observed. In the presence of Brønsted acid, however, AcrH2 is protonated to AcrH3+, which is a less effective reductive quencher. Nevertheless, the rate of dehalogenation is increased, and the authors suggest a change in mechanism to explain this observation. Rather than reductive quenching by AcrH2 or AcrH3+, they propose direct oxidative quenching by the substrate, which is known to be accelerated by Brønsted acids.185,186 Under these conditions, quenching rates for the ketones match or exceed those measured for AcrH2 in the absence of acid. The exact nature of this acid catalysis, and the possibility of PCET, is not discussed.</p><p>Bissember and coworkers recently disclosed a reaction between maleimides and dialkylanilines that utilizes TFA as a co-catalyst.187 The authors propose that the role of this Brønsted acid is to facilitate the aerobic oxidation of the photoexcited [CuI]* catalyst to [CuII], although they do not comment on the exact mechanism by which this takes place. They also consider that the TFA may accelerate downstream steps as well, which is a general phenomenon discussed in the following section (2.3.2). PCET may also be used to remove a net hydrogen atom, rather than add one. For example, Knowles showed that amides could be oxidized to amidyl radicals and cyclized onto tethered alkenes (Scheme 40).188 The key PCET step is thought to involve simultaneous deprotonation of 150 by a catalytic phosphate base and electron transfer to photoexcited [IrIII]*. Following cyclization, alkyl radical 152 can either add to 149 and gain a net hydrogen atom to form 151,188 or directly abstract a hydrogen atom from an appropriate donor (hydrogen atom transfer co-catalysis is discussed further in Section 2.4.2).189</p><!><p>Brønsted acids can control non-photochemical processes downstream of the photoactivation step in a manner analogous to Lewis acid co-catalysts. For example, the Yoon group studied the addition of photocatalytically generated α-amino radical 155 to methyl vinyl ketone (Scheme 41).190 This reaction was accelerated by acidic additives such as TFA, which the authors proposed could increase the net electrophilicity of the Michael acceptor.</p><p>Ooi recently disclosed a highly enantioselective radical coupling based on the idea of ion pairing.191 In their proposed mechanism (Scheme 42), amine 157 quenches the photoexcited iridium catalyst, which can then reduce imine 156 to the corresponding radical anion. Hydrogen bond donor 158+ undergoes counterion exchange with this species to form chiral ion pair 160. At the same time, oxidized 157•+ is deprotonated to form α-amino radical 161 which adds to 160 to form 159.</p><p>The Yoon laboratory reported the photocatalytic reduction of nitroarenes such as 162 (Scheme 43).192 The addition of a catalytic amount of camphorsulphonic acid (CSA) was required for the formation of cyclized hydroxamic acid 165; in its absence of this co-catalyst, only hydroxylamine 164 was observed.</p><p>Brønsted acid additives have been empirically shown to be beneficial in a number of other photoredox transformations as well, although the precise nature of their effect is not always clear. For example, Maity and Zheng reported a photocatalytic oxidative indole synthesis that is accelerated by the addition of silica gel.193 Yu employed a catalytic amount of p-chlorobenzenesulfonic acid in the photocatalytic synthesis of azaarenes, presumably to facilitate formation of an acyl oxime precursor rather than to influence PET.194 Qi and Zhang found that catalytic TsOH improved their synthesis of α-alkoxybenzamides.195 König observed improved performance of photocatalytic amine deprotection at low pH, though the mechanistic basis of this effect was not determined.196</p><!><p>Over the past two decades, organocatalysis has evolved into a robust and diverse theme of contemporary synthetic research. A wide range of organocatalytic activation modes have been used in conjunction with photoredox catalysis. The majority of these co-catalysts influence the photocatalytic activation step itself, either by facilitating electron transfer or by catalytically generating a transient species that participates directly in the PET process. Other co-catalysts impact the rate of downstream steps by interacting with a reactive intermediate produced by photoactivation but not with the photocatalyst itself. The organization of this section will be based upon the class of organocatalyst utilized.</p><!><p>Some of the earliest applications of organocatalysis to photoredox reactions were developed by MacMillan, who reported several protocols for the α-functionalization of aldehydes. The general mechanism for these reactions is exemplified by Scheme 44, and is proposed to be operative for the addition of α-carbonyl,197 fluoroalkyl,198 α-cyanoalkyl,199 benzyl,200 and carbamoyl groups.201</p><p>The condensation of chiral secondary amine 168 with aldehyde 166 provides enamine 170. A sacrificial quantity of this species quenches the photoexcited Ru(bpy)32+ catalyst, forming Ru(bpy)3+. This reduces alkyl halide 167 to 167•−, which then undergoes dehalogenation to afford electron deficient α-ketoradical 171. The SOMOphilic enamine 170 undergoes radical addition to 171, and the resulting α-amino radical can either be oxidized by photoexcited Ru(bpy)32+ or another equivalent of the alkyl halide in a chain propagative manner.9 Finally, the iminium ion can be hydrolyzed to release the α-functionalized product and regenerate the amine organocatalyst. In addition to high yields under mild conditions, these reactions produce highly enantioenriched products due to the exquisite facial selectivity afforded by this class of organocatalysts in the radical addition step.</p><p>Following MacMillan's initial report, several other research groups have merged enamine organocatalysis with photoredox catalysis. For example, Luo developed a highly enantioselective photoredox alkylation protocol that was able to construct a variety of acyclic, cyclic, and spirocyclic quaternary stereocenters using a secondary amine organocatalyst.202 Koike and Akita demonstrated that organocatalytically generated chiral enamines could be oxidized and trapped with TEMPO,203 and the Jang group showed that the chiral enamine intermediate for this α-oxygenation could be accessed via chiral iminium catalyzed conjugate addition.204 Gualandi reported that an inexpensive Fe(bpy)3Br2 catalyst could be used in place of a Ru photocatalyst,205 while the Zeitler206,207 and Ferroud208 groups independently showed that transition metal photocatalysts could often be replaced by photoredox-active organic dyes such as Eosin Y and Rose Bengal.</p><p>MacMillan also demonstrated that selective β-functionalization of aldehydes and ketones could be accomplished using a related co-catalytic system (Scheme 45). Photoexcited Ir(ppy)3 can reduce electron-poor cyanoarenes such as 1 to 1•−. Concomitantly, aldehyde 166 can condense with secondary amine 172 to afford enamine 174, which is then oxidized by Ir(ppy)3+ and deprotonated to form the 5π e− β-enamine radical 175. The authors propose these two radical species undergo heterocoupling, and upon loss of cyanide and hydrolysis this affords β-arylated product 173.209</p><p>MacMillan also developed a similar reaction that utilized ketones210 and imines211 in place of cyanoarenes (Scheme 46). In this case, formation of α-amino radical 179 was proposed to be facilitated by a catalytic amount of acid, presumably via PCET activation. These protocols also employ 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) as a redox mediator. This base quenches the Ir*(ppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6 photocatalyst more rapidly than either substrate, and the resultant DABCO•+ can oxidize enamine 180. The mediator is also able to shift the reaction selectivity, as it generates exclusively β-Mannich product 178, while the reaction intrinsically gives a mixture of α- and β-products in its absence. In the case of ketones, LiAsF6 proved to be important in minimizing the occurrence of ketyl radical dimerization by stabilizing this intermediate. Thus, in addition to the iridium photocatalyst, this reaction is influenced by an organocatalyst, a redox mediator, a Brønsted and Lewis acid catalyst.</p><p>The MacMillan laboratory developed an analogous coupling with electron-deficient alkenes (Scheme 47).212 In this case, however, oxidation of the enamine was proposed to be from direct quenching of the excited photocatalyst, Ir(dmppy)2(dtbbpy)PF6. The β-enamine radical could then add to Michael acceptors such as 181 and be further reduced to afford the β-alkylated product 183.</p><p>The photooxidation of amines constitutes a major theme of research in synthetic photochemistry. Many classical213,214 and contemporary215,216 methods have exploited the photogeneration of iminium ions via amine oxidation and subsequently trapped them using a range of nucleophiles. Among the most thoroughly studied transformations in this context involve the oxidation of N-phenyltetrahydroisoquinoline (THIQ) 153, which is particularly susceptible towards oxidative functionalization. Several reports of tandem photocatalytic/organocatalytic Mannich reactions have been published based upon this reactivity. For example, Rueping and coworkers demonstrated that iminium ion 185 could be coupled with ketones using proline as an organocatalyst (Scheme 48).217 Zeitler expanded this method to other amine scaffolds and also improved throughput by carrying out the reactions in a flow photoreactor.207 Organic photoredox sensitizers have also been utilized for these reactions. For example, Tan accomplished the amine oxidation/organocatalytic coupling with Rose Bengal,218 while Zhao employed a variety of BODIPY photocatalysts.219</p><!><p>Photoinduced electron transfer processes result in the formation of open-shelled intermediates, and production of closed-shell products via efficient termination of open-shell reaction manifolds often proves to be somewhat challenging. One strategy that has proven to be particularly important in photoredox chemistry has been the use of organic hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) co-catalysts.</p><p>Nicewicz has exploited this strategy extensively to develop high-yielding anti-Markovnikov alkene functionalization reactions (Scheme 49).220 Photoexcitation of 9-mesityl-10-methylacridinium perchlorate (Mes-Acr+ ClO4−) and quenching by alkene 186 gives radical cation 186•+. Alkene radical cations are susceptible to attack by a range of nucleophiles;51–53,85–86 intramolecular cyclization of the pendant alcohol in this case affords 189. This tertiary alkyl radical is insufficiently oxidizing to directly react with 186 in chain propagating electron transfer or with the reduced photocatalyst to regenerate the photochemically active acridinium. With no co-catalyst, therefore, the rate of product formation is relatively slow. However, the introduction of 2-phenylmalononitrile 187 as a hydrogen atom shuttle that reacts with 189 affords the closed shell product 188. This HAT co-catalyst is then regenerated by electron transfer from the reduced Mes-Acr photocatalyst. In addition to 187, subsequent work from this laboratory showed that methylthiosalicylate,221 thiophenol,222 and phenylsulfinic acid223 could also act as HAT catalysts. Thiophenol in particular could be generated in situ from operationally benign phenyldisulfide.224</p><p>Using a similar strategy, Nicewicz has also achieved anti-Markovnikov functionalization of alkenes with ethers,220,225,226 amines,222,224 trifluoromethyl groups,221 halogens,227 carboxylic acids,223 amides, and thioamides.228 Complex heterocyclic scaffolds are accessible using an intermolecular coupling partner with an additional π system (Scheme 50). Initial addition of 191 to radical cation 190•+ affords radical 193, which can cyclize on a pendant alkene229,230 or oxime231 before being trapped by the HAT catalyst to afford 192.</p><p>Thiyl HAT co-catalysts can also be used to terminate radical intermediates that are photogenerated in other ways. For example, the photooxidation of carboxylic acids is a well-established method to produce carbon-centered radicals via decarboxylation.232 Nicewicz demonstrated that these radicals could be productively intercepted by thiyl HAT co-catalysts; in their absence, these radicals primarily undergo homodimerization.233–235</p><p>Nicewicz has also recently reported a protocol for C–H amination of arenes with nitrogen nucleophiles.236 In the proposed mechanism ( Scheme 51), [Mes-Acr+]* oxidizes arene 194, which can be attacked by an amine nucleophile 195. Following deprotonation to neutral radical 197, TEMPO is used to abstract a hydrogen atom, affording the closed shell product. The HAT co-catalyst can then be regenerated by a reactive oxygen species.</p><p>MacMillan has also developed several reactions that employ thiols as HAT co-catalysts (Scheme 52). In an early example, methyl 2-mercaptoacetate 199 was deprotonated and oxidized by Ir(ppy)3+ to afford thiyl radical 201; this intermediate can abstract a hydrogen atom from benzylic ethers such as 198. The resulting radical 202 can add to both cyanoarenes237 and imines.238 The Tan group carried out benzylic bromination using a similar strategy with morpholine as the HAT catalyst.239 Li reported the oxidation of primary alcohols using tandem photoredox/TEMPO catalysis.240 The authors proposed a mechanism in which photoexcited Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2 oxidizes TEMPO to the corresponding oxammonium, a known reagent for alcohol oxidation.</p><p>This method has been expanded to include the activation of other compounds with weak C–H bonds. The direct allylic coupling of simple alkenes such as 203 with cyanoarenes was achieved using HAT organocatalyst 204 (Scheme 53). 241 Primary alcohols can also be used, and their coupling with heteroarenes was followed by an intriguing spin-center shift rearrangement.242 The presence of a base proved advantageous for these reactions, presumably by facilitating sulfur oxidation through a PCET process (see Section 2.3.1).</p><p>This Brønsted acid/base synergy was further exploited for the site selective activation of aliphatic alcohols (Scheme 54).243 In these reactions, the radical cation of the catalytic quinuclidine is proposed to abstract a hydrogen atom adjacent to the alcohol. The phosphate co-catalyst in this process forms a hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl functionality; the resulting increase in hydricity facilitates the HAT process.</p><!><p>Rovis demonstrated that photoredox chemistry can also be merged with the use of chiral N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) organocatalysis (Scheme 55).244 Addition of NHC 209 to propionaldehyde 208 results in the formation of Breslow intermediate 212. This nucleophilic species was used to trap THIQ iminium ion 185, which was generated by photoquenched RuIII.245–247 The resulting amino alcohol 213 could fragment to form α-amino ketone 211 in good enantioselectivity and regenerate the NHC catalyst.</p><p>Stephenson reported a procedure for the synthesis of symmetric anhydrides from carboxylic acids using photocatalysis (Scheme 56).248 Their reaction is carried out in DMF, which is proposed to catalyze the dehydration by formation of the Vilsmeyer reagent 216
in situ. The authors propose a mechanism in which photoexcited Ru(bpy)3Cl2 promotes reductive dehalogenation of CBr4 to form •CBr3. Addition of this radical to DMF, followed by oxidation and bromide exchange forms 216. This can in turn act as an acyl transfer reagent for the formation of anhydride 215 from 214 with concomitant regeneration of DMF.</p><p>Finally, Hopkinson, Glorius, and coworkers merged a typical photoredox cycle with a catalytic halide salt in order to achieve the oxidative trifluoromethylthiolation of styrenes (Scheme 57).249 In the mechanism proposed by these authors, the bromide additive reacts with N-(trifluoromethylthio)phthalimide 218 to afford highly reactive trifluoromethylsufenyl bromide 220 in situ. This species undergoes photoreduction and mesolytic cleavage to form •SCF3 and to regenerate Br−. Addition of the sulfur-centered radical to styrene 217 followed by radical-polar crossover affords product 219. Lu and Xiao proposed a conceptually similar application of halide catalysis in order to generate allyl iodides in situ, which could then be coupled with N-aryltetrahdroisoquinolines.250</p><!><p>Transition metal catalysis has become an indispensable tool in all areas of synthetic chemistry, for a variety of reasons. Among the most important features in the design of new organometallic transformations is the ability of a transition metal center to exist in multiple oxidation states, each of which can access distinct reactivity patterns. Thus, the combination of transition metal catalysis and photoredox catalysis offers unique opportunities for the innovative design of powerful synthetic transformations. Because the use of transition metal catalysts in tandem with photoredox catalysts is a relatively recent development, few of these reactions have been subject to detailed mechanistic interrogation, and there is still considerable ambiguity regarding many mechanistic subtleties in these processes. Broadly speaking, however, there are a handful of dominant reaction modes that effectively describe most current examples of photoredox/transition metal dual catalysis.</p><p>The following section is organized according to the manner in which the transition metal catalyst and the photocatalyst interact in the mechanisms proposed by the authors. First, we will discuss transition metal catalyzed reactions where photocatalysis produces an oxidation state change that facilitates an otherwise sluggish organometallic step (Figure 6A). These can occur either by direct electron transfer between the organometallic complex and the photocatalyst or be mediated by a photogenereated reactive intermediate such as superoxide. Second, we will discuss reactions in which a photogenerated reactive intermediate is intercepted by an organometallic complex (Figure 6B). In these reactions, the redox balance is often proposed to be maintained by a secondary back electron transfer between the organometallic fragment and the photocatalyst; however, the principal role of the photocatalyst in these methods is the independent production of the key reactive intermediate.</p><!><p>Catalyst turnover by reoxidation of a reduced transition metal is often the rate-limiting process in oxidative organometallic transformations. To address this challenge, Rueping developed an indole synthesis based upon the intramolecular oxidative C–H arylation of enamides (Scheme 58).251 The authors proposed a mechanism in which the organometallic steps are rapid but where aerobic oxidation of the Pd0 catalyst is slow. The authors hypothesized that a photocatalyst could facilitate this reoxidation process. The details of the oxidation have not yet been elucidated, but given the two-electron oxidation state change required, the mechanism must presumably be somewhat more complicated than a simple bimolecular photoinduced single electron transfer. Rueping has utilized a similar design strategy in oxidative Heck reactions of aryl amides252 and phenols253 catalyzed by rhodium and ruthenium, respectively.</p><p>Photocatalysts may also be used to enable novel or unusual reactivity by accessing higher metal oxidation states. The MacMillan laboratory demonstrated this concept in the coupling of simple alcohols with aryl bromides (Scheme 59).254 Nickel-catalyzed cross couplings of this type are difficult due because C–O reductive elimination from NiII is predicted to be thermodynamically uphill. However, oxidation to NiIII by photoexcited Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)(PF6) renders this step energetically favorable. In the proposed catalytic cycle, NiI is returned to Ni0 by the reduced IrII photocatalyst. A similar mechanism was invoked for the decarboxylative coupling of acids and acid chlorides,255 as well as the oxidative coupling of anilines with alkenes reported by Jamison.256</p><p>A limited number of examples utilizing this strategy have been reported using other transition metal co-catalysts. Kobayashi disclosed a copper-catalyzed Chan–Lam protocol that employs Ir(ppy)3 as a co-catalyst.257 The key bond forming step is postulated to require reductive elimination from CuIII, which can be accessed either by PET to the photoexcited [IrIII]* or by superoxide. You, Cho, and coworkers reported a Pd/Ir-dual catalysis strategy for the formation of carbazoles.258 The photocatalyst is proposed to oxidize the intermediate complexes to either PdIII or PdIV to facilitate the transformation.</p><p>Tunge developed a method for the decarboxylative allylation of alkanoic esters using a combination of Pd(PPh3)4 and Ir(ppy)2(bpy)(BF4).259 In their proposed mechanism (Scheme 60), reaction of allylic ester 225 with Pd0 affords π-allyl complex 227. Subsequent photooxidation of the aniline triggers radical decarboxylation. Palladium complex 228 may undergo reductive elimination and SET from IrII to form product 226, which has been suggested in related systems.260 Alternatively, liberation and heterodimerization of p-aminobenzylic radical 229 with allyl radical 230 could also give rise to 226. This pathway was postulated based on the observation of side products consistent with homodimerization of 229 and 230, as well as stereochemical probe experiments.261 A similar transformation was reported by Lu, Xiao, and coworkers using an allyl phosphate in place of the ester.262 In both cases, the extent to which palladium is involved in the bond-forming step seems to depend on the stability of the possible radical intermediate, with more stable species favoring the latter pathway, and less stable radicals favoring the former.</p><!><p>The facile photooxidation of tetrahydroisoquinoline 153 to the corresponding iminium ion 185 has become a relatively common means to test the compatibility of photoredox catalysis with complementary activation modes. As such, several recent reports have described the reaction of the photogenerated iminium electrophile with organometallic nucleophiles. Stephenson263 and Rueping264 independently reported that metal acetylides are good nucleophiles in this context. These groups reported cross dehydrogenative coupling reactions in which silver or copper salts activate terminal alkyne 231 and the resulting metal acetylide 233 adds to iminium ion 185 (Scheme 61). An asymmetric adaptation of this method was reported by Li and coworkers using (R)-QUINAP as a chiral ligand for copper.265 Zhao demonstrated that BODIPY photocatalysts could also be used to perform the amine oxidation in place of ruthenium or iridium species.266</p><p>Sanford reported an early example of photoredox/transition metal dual catalysis (Scheme 62).267,268 Her laboratory's detailed mechanistic studies of the Pd-catalyzed oxidative C–H arylation of phenylpyridines had revealed that the metallation of the C–H bond is relatively facile but that oxidation of the resulting cyclometallated PdII intermediate 237 by hypervalent iodoarene oxidants is inefficient and rate-limiting. Thus, Sanford developed a strategy to utilize photogenerated aryl radicals as more reactive oxidants in these reactions. Taking advantage of an insight reported by Cano-Yelo and Deronzier,269 Sanford generated aryl radical 238 by the photocatalytic reduction of aryl diazonium salt 235. This species reacts rapidly at room temperature with cyclometallated intermediate 237 to generate arylated Pd complex 239 at a higher oxidation state, which is poised to undergo rapid reductive elimination. This dual catalyst strategy enabled the Pd-catalyzed C–H arylation reaction to be conducted at room temperature under conditions considerably milder than previously reported.</p><p>Gold complexes have become recognized as synthetically powerful soft Lewis acidic catalysts for the activation of carbon–carbon multiple bonds. Several reactions involving the interception of photogenerated aryl radicals with organometallic gold complexes have recently been described. Glorius reported a strategy for combining gold and photoredox catalysis to effect the alkoxyarylation of alkenes (Scheme 63).270,271 In this process, the role of the π-acidic catalyst (Ph3PAu)NTf2 is to activate the alkene of substrate 240 toward alcohol addition. The authors proposed that the resulting alkyl gold species 242 is attacked by a photocatalytically generated aryl radical 238. This combination would produce a high-valent organogold species that is poised to undergo facile reductive elimination, in conceptual analogy to the photocatalytic Pd-catalyzed arylation developed by Sanford (Scheme 62).267</p><p>Toste suggested a slightly different mechanism for the gold-catalyzed arylative ring expansion of vinyl cyclobutanol 243 (Scheme 64).272,273 In his proposal, AuI first adds to photochemically generated aryl radical 238, before alkene coordination and oxidation. The resultant high-valent intermediate 245 is well-suited to catalyze the ring expansion and reductive elimination giving rise to product 244. This strategy has since been utilized for a variety of methods, including the coupling of arenes with terminal alkynes274,275 and propargyl alcohols,276,277 as well as the hydroarylation of alkynes277 and the formation of sp2 C–P bonds.278</p><p>First-row transition metals are particularly promising partners for dual catalytic systems involving photoredox catalysis due to the relative ease by which they undergo one-electron redox changes. Molander exploited this behavior in several examples of organoboron cross coupling using nickel chemistry in tandem with photoredox catalysis.279 The initial studies investigating this combination involved the reaction of trifluoroborate 246 and aryl bromide 247 (Scheme 65). Oxidation of 246 by the photoexcited iridium catalyst generates benzylic radical 249. Concomitantly, the aryl bromide substrate undergoes oxidative addition to Ni0. The resulting NiII complex 250 then intercepts the benzylic radical to afford NiIII
251. Reductive elimination from this species releases cross-coupled product 248, along with NiI, which can be reduced by IrII. Alternatively, computational studies suggest that benzylic radical 249 may instead add directly to Ni0 to form NiI complex 252, and that the oxidative addition of aryl bromide 247 and subsequent reductive elimination occur after this step.280 Interestingly, the dissociation of benzyl radical from NiIII complex 251 is facile, meaning that there is a rapid equilibrium between 250 and 251 prior to reductive elimination, even if initial formation of 251 proceeds through NiI complex 252. This has important ramifications for stereoinduction in this system (vide infra).</p><p>This strategy has been applied to benzylic,279,281 secondary alkyl,282 alkoxymethyl,283,284 and α-amino285 boron nucleophiles. Notably, the mild conditions utilized for the photooxidation of the trifluoroborate salts do not affect other organoboron species. Thus, Molander has described conditions for the use of aryl halides bearing boronate esters and other less reactive boron functional groups in photoredox reactions, affording products poised for further elaboration by cross-coupling.286 Finally, preliminary reports have demonstrated asymmetric induction using chiral ligands on the nickel catalyst, although enantioselectivities reported to date are moderate.279,280 The facile dissociation of benzylic radical from NiIII scrambles the stereocenter, thereby rendering the transformation stereoconvergent. Moreover, the rapid equilibration between NiII and both diastereomers of NiIII creates a dynamic kinetic resolution in which the stereoselectivity is determined in the final reductive elimination.280</p><p>MacMillan and Doyle published a concurrent report of a similar Ir/Ni dual catalytic system that employs carboxylic acids in place of organoboron reagents (Scheme 66).287 Photooxidative decarboxylation of 253 affords α-amino radical 255. The authors proposed that this radical serves the same function as the benzylic radical in the Molander system; addition to NiII adduct 256 affords a high-valent NiIII complex 257 that is prone towards reductive elimination, resulting in the formation of product 254. This method was employed for the cross-coupling of aryl and vinyl halides to radicals derived from α-amino, α-oxy, and alkyl carboxylic acids.288 Acyl radicals, generated from α-keto acids, can be added to indoles289 and aryl halides.290 The latter intermediates can also participate in palladium-catalyzed cross coupling to afford direct C–H acylation of acetamides.291 Furthermore, Luo and Zhang showed that organic donor-acceptor fluorophores are effective photocatalysts for these transformations.292 Lastly, MacMillan and Fu recently developed an asymmetric variant of the α-amino acid/aryl halide coupling using semicorrin-type bis(oxazoline) ligands for nickel.293 The reaction is stereoconvergent and dictated entirely by nickel, as the radical intermediate following decarboxylation is achiral.</p><p>Several other noteworthy developments have been reported recently in this area. Investigators at AstraZeneca demonstrated that both Molander and MacMillan's protocols can be carried out using NiII salts under aerobic conditions.294 Independently, Molander295,296 and Fensterbank297,298 showed that hypervalent silicon compounds can be oxidized and fragment to alkyl radicals, which can engage in nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling as previously described. In addition to C–C bonds, this dual catalyst system is capable of forging C–S bonds by reacting with thiyl radicals, which can be generated from thiols either by oxidation/deprotonation299 or by HAT to an alkyl radical.300 Analogously, Lu, Xiao, and coworkers were able to achieve C–P cross-couplings using phosphorus-centered radicals, generated by oxidation/deprotonation of the phosphine oxide.301</p><p>Copper has also been utilized in dual catalytic systems of this type. Sanford reported the trifluoromethylation of boronic acids using Ru(bpy)3Cl2 and CuOAc (Scheme 67).302 Photocatalytic reductive dehalogenation of trifluoromethyl iodide 259 affords trifluoromethyl radical 261, which can be intercepted by CuII. Transmetallation with the arylboronic acid and reductive elimination provides product 260 along with CuI, which is proposed to undergo photooxidation to generate CuII.</p><p>A conceptually distinct photocatalytic system was reported by Saito, who performed the oxidation of adamantane and cyclododecane 257 using N,N′-dimethyl-2,7-diazapyrenium (MDAP2+) and iron co-catalysts ( Scheme 68).303 The mechanism of this process is likely to be a Fenton-type alkane oxidation by hydroxyl radical.304 The role of the photocatalyst would thus be to photoreduce dioxygen in situ, and the Fe catalyst would result in subsequent homolytic production of hydroxyl radical.</p><p>Wu has reported several examples of acceptorless dehydrogenative reactions that use Co(dmgH)2(DMAP)Cl in tandem with a photocatalyst such as Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2305,306 or Eosin Y.307 The proposed mechanism of one representative example is depicted in Scheme 69. Photooxidation and deprotonation308 of 265 affords thioamidyl radical 267, which undergo cyclization to afford 268.309 The CoIII catalyst is then proposed to be sequentially reduced by RuI and by radical 268. Proton transfer from the pentadienyl cation to the CoI complex results in the formation of rearomatized benzothiazole 266 and regenerates the CoIII catalyst with evolution of hydrogen gas. Wu has exploited a similar design strategy for the addition of β-keto esters to photocatalytically generated oxocarbenium ions.310</p><!><p>Enzymes can offer several attractive features in synthetic applications, including high chemo-, regio- and stereoselectivity, as well as the ability to use environmentally benign terminal oxidants and reductants. However, relatively few reports have described strategies to couple the catalytic reactivity of enzymes to photocatalytic reactions to date. Willner developed several systems for reductive enzymatic processes that utilize these cooperative effects (Scheme 70). Ru(bpy)32+ transfers reducing equivalents from a terminal reductant (EDTA) to a redox mediator (MV2+), which then proceeds to turn over enzymatic reduction of NADP+ to NADPH. The resulting NADPH is subsequently utilized in enzymatic ketone reductions141,311 and reductive aminations.312,313 Park used a similar strategy for the enzymatic conversion of α-ketoglutarate to L-glutamate. In these studies, [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+ was employed as a redox mediator to facilitate enzymatic reduction of NADP+.314,315 In other cases, these cofactors were proposed to turn over the photocatalyst directly.316</p><p>Oxidative transformations have also been carried out using enzymatic co-catalysis, including the oxidation of alcohols,317 hydroxylation of C–H bonds, epoxidation of alkenes,318 oxidative decarboxylation of fatty acids,319 and Baeyer–Villiger reactions of ketones. 320 These processes typically involve the photochemical generation of oxidants such as H2O2 or NADP+, which then participate in downstream enzyme catalysis.</p><!><p>A second important mechanism of photocatalytic activation involves production of radical intermediates via the transfer of a hydrogen atom from an organic substrate directly to a photoexcited chromophore. The previous section discussed several examples of transformations that involve two discrete photooxidation and deprotonation steps, which can produce similar reactive radical intermediates. However, the feasibility of concerted hydrogen atom transfer is largely determined by C–H bond strength, while redox potential is the relevant thermodynamic parameter in photoinduced electron transfer processes. The previous section also discussed C–H abstraction using HAT co-catalysts as a strategy for photoredox catalysis (Section 2.4.2). The transformations discussed in the following section, however, involve direct cleavage of a C–H bond by the photocatalyst and thus do not require a secondary catalyst to generate the key radical intermediate.</p><p>Jones, Edwards, and Parr reported an example using benzophenone in conjunction with CuII to perform the aerobic dehydration of alkanes (Scheme 71).321 The authors proposed a mechanism in which photoexcited benzophenone abstracts H• from cyclohexane to generate alkyl radical 272. CuII subsequently serves to both oxidize this radical and regenerate the photocatalyst, and CuI can be reoxidized by oxygen.</p><p>More recently, Sorensen reported similar reactivity using polyoxotungstate TBADT and a cobaloxime co-catalyst.322 This dual catalytic system was effective for the dehydrogenation of both alkanes and alcohols (Scheme 72). After excitation, the polyoxometalate photocatalyst can abstract a hydrogen atom from 273, and the resulting radical can undergo a second HAT step with the cobalt catalyst, generating oxidized product 3. The tandem catalytic cycle is turned over by evolution of H2 from the cobaloxime complex.</p><!><p>A third major mechanism of photocatalytic activation involves the sensitization of organic substrates via energy transfer. In the context of organic synthesis, the predominant mechanism for activation of substrates by this method has been the Dexter electron exchange mechanism.5 This process can be conceptualized as simultaneous photoinduced electron transfer both to and from the excited state of the photocatalyst. This results in the generation an electronically excited substrate molecule and concomitant relaxation of the photocatalyst to its electronic ground state (Scheme 73). Importantly, the electron exchange process results in no net redox chemistry. Thus electrochemical potentials are not typically useful predictors of reactivity for these reactions. Instead, the relative triplet state energies for both photocatalyst and substrate are more important determinants in the feasibility of energy transfer.</p><p>Photosensitization by energy transfer thus provides a means to access the distinctive reactivity of electronically excited molecules, with several important advantages over direct photoexcitation of the substrate. First, direct irradiation of ground-state, closed-shell organic molecules leads to the formation of excited singlets; these often do not undergo efficient intersystem crossing to longer-lived triplet states and thus relax rapidly to the ground state before useful bimolecular reactions can occur. Useful triplet sensitizers, on the other hand, generally undergo rapid intersystem crossing and provide a more efficient route for the production of triplet state organic compounds. Additionally, direct photoexcitation of most organic compounds requires relatively high-energy UV light that can be incompatible with common organic functional groups such as organohalides and nitroarenes. Most common photocatalytic chromophores, however, typically absorb at longer wavelengths that are more compatible with the densely functionalized, complex organic structures common in synthetic applications.</p><p>On the other hand, the use of co-catalysts to modulate the reactivity of photocatalytically generated excited state intermediates presents unique challenges. The lifetimes of the open-shell radical intermediates generated through electron transfer or hydrogen atom transfer photocatalysis, though short, are nevertheless substantially longer than the lifetimes of electronically excited intermediates. A variety of distinctive deactivation modes are available to photoexcited compounds, including unimolecular emissive and vibrational relaxation pathways that are generally fast. As such, the ability of a second molecular catalyst to intercept the electronically excited substrate and impact its reactivity is limited.</p><p>Nevertheless, several reports of dual catalyst systems have proposed that the photocatalytic component engages in an energy transfer process. Many of these reactions involve the photochemical generation of singlet oxygen, the lifetime of which is on the order of several hundreds of microseconds,323 much longer than the lifetimes of simple excited state organic compounds. This section covers the use of energy transfer photocatalysis in conjunction with a second organic, transition metal, or Brønsted acid co-catalyst.</p><!><p>Adam reported an early example in which a transition metal catalyst is used to activate the ground-state product of a photosensitization reaction. Tetraphenylporphyrin (H2TPP) is a common photocatalyst for the production of singlet oxygen via energy transfer. Reaction of 1O2 with alkene 275 affords allylic hydroperoxide 277, which subsequently reacts with a TiIV alkokide catalyst (Scheme 74). This results in O-atom transfer to the alkene to generate α-epoxy alcohol 276.324</p><p>The scope for this transformation is remarkably broad, and the primary competing reactions are reduction of the allylic hydroperoxide for electron deficient substrates in which the epoxidation step is slow. Additionally, the authors demonstrate that the use of (+)-diethyl tartrate (DET) as a chiral element in the epoxidation generates enantioenriched products in good yields and moderate enantioselectivities (Scheme 75).</p><p>Campestrini recently demonstrated a similar transformation using Mo(CO)6 as a catalyst.325 However, because the molybdenum catalyst consumes two equivalents of hydroperoxide for each epoxide formed, a maximum theoretical yield of 50% is possible for each olefin substrate. Nevertheless, yields of up to 38% (77% of theoretical maximum) were obtained under the optimized conditions.</p><p>Krief developed a multi-catalytic cascade process exploiting singlet oxygen sensitization for olefin dihydroxylation (Scheme 76).326 Earlier work by this group had shown that photochemically generated singlet oxygen can oxidize selenides such as 282.327 The resulting selenoxide 283 is capable of oxidizing OsVI to OsVIII.328 Thus, by combining Rose Bengal as a photocatalyst for singlet oxygen generation, benzyl phenyl selenide 282, and catalytic K2OsO2(OH)4, the authors were able to develop a high-yielding protocol for an aerobic version of the Sharpless asymmetric dihydroxylation329 of 280 to 281.</p><p>The use of photocatalysts to directly interact with a second catalytic transition metal species can be considered a conceptually different strategy from the preceding examples. Kobayashi proposed such a mechanism330 to rationalize the observation that the addition of Ir(ppy)3 accelerates the rate of a photochemical Ullman coupling developed recently by Fu and Peters (Scheme 77).331–333 The key step of the original, single-catalyst system involves photoinduced electron transfer between CuI bis(carbazole) complex 287 and iodoarene 285; this process results in the formation of aryl radical 238 that recombines with the oxidized CuII complex to furnish a product featuring a new C–N bond. Kobayashi330 suggests that the formation of excited [CuI]* complex 288 can arise from sensitization of 287 by 3[Ir]*. The main benefit of the dual-catalyst system is the ability to excited the Ir complex at longer wavelengths than the CuI carbazole complex.</p><!><p>A pioneering example of the use of chiral amines to influence energy transfer photoreactions was reported by Shioiri,334 who investigated the enantioselective photooxygenation of N-Moc tryptamine 289 using photogenerated singlet oxygen and (−)-nicotine (Scheme 78). Although the mechanism of stereoinduction was not proposed, experimentally significant levels of enantiomeric excess were reported.</p><p>Subsequent work by Córdova also utilized chiral amine co-catalysts in asymmetric photooxygenation reactions (Scheme 79). This work took advantage of the enantiocontrol offered by amino acids and derivatives such as the Jørgensen–Hayashi diarylprolinol335 in a range of aldehyde336,337 and ketone338 functionalization reactions. Reaction of the transient chiral enamine intermediate with photogenerated singlet oxygen was proposed to furnish hydroperoxide 292
in situ, which was reduced to diol 293 upon workup with NaBH4. Gryko has reported that the formation of trace 1O2-derived oxidative byproducts can be observed by GC-MS to support the intermediacy of both enamine and singlet oxygen in this reaction.339</p><p>Meng demonstrated that asymmetric phase transfer catalysis could also be used to control the stereochemistry of photocatalytic enolate oxidation reactions (Scheme 80).340 The optimal system utilized quaternized cinchona alkaloid salt 295+ Br− as the phase transfer catalyst and H2TPP as the sensitizer for singlet oxygen generation. Upon deprotonation, β-ketoester 294 was converted to enolate 297, and the addition of 1O2 was controlled by chiral counterion 295+. The activation of oxygen by energy transfer was validated using experiments showing that the reaction rate was retarded in the presence of a singlet oxygen trap (DABCO)341 but not in the presence of a trap for superoxide (p-benzoquinone).342</p><!><p>König has studied the photocatalytic amination of electron-rich heteroarenes with benzoyl azides and reported that the use of a Brønsted acid co-catalyst is necessary for optimal reactivity (Scheme 81).343 The authors propose photocatalytic activation of benzoyl azide 298 using Ru(bpy)3Cl2 as a triplet sensitizer, which liberates dinitrogen to generate free nitrene 301. Under neutral reaction conditions, this intermediate can undergo rapid unimolecular Curtius rearrangement to a phenyl isocyanate 302 or perform a C–H abstraction to yield benzamide 303. However, under the strongly acidic reaction conditions, the authors suggest that protonation of the nitrene minimizes these side reactions and promotes electrophilic attack onto electron rich aromatic systems to afford C–H amination product 300.</p><p>Hanson has reported that excited state proton transfer chemistry can be sensitized using transition metal chromophores (Scheme 82).344 The hydroxyl moiety of an excited state naphthol 307 is significantly acidified relative to the ground state 306 and is capable of protonating silyl enol ethers. While this reaction can be accessed directly by UV irradiation of appropriate naphthols, the authors show that the addition of an Ir sensitizer enables longer wavelengths of light to be used.</p><!><p>There has recently been an increasing awareness among synthetic chemists that the use of two catalysts in a single chemical reaction is a powerful design strategy that can effect transformations that are either difficult or impossible to achieve otherwise. It is interesting to reflect on the observation that dual catalyst strategies have been a major theme of research in organic photochemistry for many decades, long predating the recent renewal of interest in synthetic photoredox catalysis. Non-photoactive co-catalysts have been used to alter the rate of all aspects of photocatalytic reactions. They can be used to impact the properties of the photocatalyst or the rate of the photoactivation steps; they can be used to transiently generate intermediates that intersect with the excited state of the photocatalyst; or they can be used to control the rate and selectivity of steps that occur downstream of the photoactivation step itself.</p><p>One might rationalize the uniquely enabling impact of dual catalyst strategies in photochemistry as a consequence of the ways in which photocatalysis differs from other modes of catalysis. The ability to absorb and convert the energy of a photon into useful chemical potential does not necessarily require strongly bonding interactions with the substrate. Thus photocatalysts often do not need to possess potentially reactive binding sites, and the range of co-catalysts that consequently have been shown to be compatible with photocatalysis spans a remarkably broad range, from simple protic additives to enzymes and structurally complex transition metal assemblies. As photochemistry becomes an increasingly common tool for synthesis, the development of new dual catalytic approaches will surely continue to be a powerfully enabling strategy for the photochemical construction of complex organic molecules.</p>