Synthesis, molecular modeling and biological evaluation of novel tadalafil analogues as phosphodiesterase 5 and colon tumor cell growth inhibitors, new stereochemical perspective
The synthesis of novel tadalafil analogues in which the benzodioxole moiety is replaced by 2-bromophenyl; the chiral carbons swing from R,R to R,S, S,R and S,S; the piperazinedione ring is maintained or reduced to the 5-membered imidazolidinedione or thioxoimidazolinone is described. The prepared analogues were evaluated for their capacity to inhibit the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) selective phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) isozyme and the growth of human HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells. The R absolute configuration of C-5 in the \xce\xb2-carboline-hydantoin and C-6 in the \xce\xb2-carboline-piperazinedione derivatives was found to be essential for the PDE5 inhibition. In addition, tadalafil analogues that were synthesized from L-tryptophan were more active than those derived from D-tryptophan, which is of economic value and expands the horizon for the discovery of new carbolines as PDE5 inhibitors. While some analogues displayed potent tumor cell growth inhibitory activity, there was no apparent correlation with their PDE5 inhibitory activity, which leads us to conclude that other PDE isozymes or PDE5 splice variants may be involved.
1. Introduction<!>2. Chemistry<!>3. Biological results and discussion<!>4. Conclusion<!>5.1. Chemistry<!>5.1.1. Methyl 1-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (3a\xe2\x80\x93d)<!>5.1.2. (1R,3R) Methyl 1-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (3a)<!>5.1.3. (1S,3R) Methyl 1-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (3b)<!>5.1.4. (1S,3S) Methyl 1-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (3c)<!>5.1.5. (1R,3S) Methyl 1-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (3d)<!>5.1.6. 5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,3(2H)-dione (4a\xe2\x80\x93d)<!>5.1.7. (5R,11aR)-5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6] pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1, 3(2H)-dione (4a)<!>5.1.8. (5S,11aR)-5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6] pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,3(2H)-dione (4b)<!>5.1.9. (5S,11aS)-5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6] pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1, 3(2H)-dione (4c)<!>5.1.10. (5R,11aS)-5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6] pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1, 3(2H)-dione (4d)<!>5.1.11. 5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-1-oxo-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6] pyrido[3,4-b]indole-3(2H)-thione (5a, 5b)<!>5.1.12. (5S,11aR)-5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-1-oxo-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo [1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-3(2H)-thione (5a)<!>5.1.13. (5R-11aS)-5-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-1-oxo-5,6,11,11a-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo [1\xe2\x80\xb2,5\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-3(2H)-thione (5b)<!>5.1.14. General procedure for methyl 1-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-(2-chloroacetyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (6a\xe2\x80\x93d)<!>5.1.15. Methyl (1R,3R)-1-(2-bromophenyl)-2-(2-chloroacetyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (6a)<!>5.1.16. Methyl (1S,3R)-1-(2-bromophenyl)-2-(2-chloroacetyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (6b)<!>5.1.17. Methyl (1S,3S)-1-(2-bromophenyl)-2-(2-chloroacetyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (6c)<!>5.1.18. Methyl (1R,3S)-1-(2-bromophenyl)-2-(2-chloroacetyl)-2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-1H-\xce\xb2-carboline-3-carboxylate (6d)<!>5.1.19. Preparation of 2-alkyl or 2-benzyl-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (7a\xe2\x80\x9310d)<!>5.1.20. (6R,12aR)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (7a)<!>5.1.21. (6S,12aR)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (7b)<!>5.1.22. (6S,12aS)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (7c)<!>5.1.23. (6R,12aS)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-methyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (7d)<!>5.1.24. (6R,12aR)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (8a)<!>5.1.25. (6S,12aR)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (8b)<!>5.1.26. (6S,12aS)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (8c)<!>5.1.27. (6R,12aS)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-ethyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (8d)<!>5.1.28. (6R,12aR)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-butyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (9a)<!>5.1.29. (6S,12aR)-2-Butyl-6-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino[1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (9b)<!>5.1.30. (6S,12aS)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-butyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (9c)<!>5.1.31. (6R,12aS)-6-(2-Bromophenyl)-2-butyl-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (9d)<!>5.1.32. (6R,12aR)-2-Benzyl-6-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (10a)<!>5.1.33. (6S,12aR)-2-Benzyl-6-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (10b)<!>5.1.34. (6S,12aS)-2-Benzyl-6-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (10c)<!>5.1.35. (6R,12aS)-2-Benzyl-6-(2-bromophenyl)-2,3,6,7,12,12a-hexahydropyrazino [1\xe2\x80\xb2,2\xe2\x80\xb2:1,6]pyrido[3,4-b]indole-1,4-dione (10d)<!>5.2.1. Cell cultures<!>5.2.2. Growth assays<!>5.2.3. Phosphodiesterase assay<!>5.2.4. Experimental design and data analysis<!>5.3. Molecular modeling
<p>Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) is a key enzyme involved in the regulation of cGMP-specific signaling pathways by catalyzing the hydrolysis of the cyclic nucleotide cGMP into 5′ guanosine monophosphates. It's an essential regulator in normal physiological processes such as smooth muscle contraction and relaxation and it is the major PDE isozyme in penile corpus cavernosum tissue that plays a key role in the control of penile erection [1,2]. Tadalafil (Fig. 1) is an orally active tetrahydro-β-carboline (THBC) derivative with PDE5 inhibitory properties that is marketed for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction. Its local vasodilatation action is mediated through high levels of cGMP in male corpus cavernosum [3].</p><p>Recent studies showed that PDE5 and other cGMP-PDEs are over expressed in a variety of cancers like colon, pancreatic, lung and bladder cancers relative to normal tissues. Moreover, inhibition and consequent high levels of cGMP may be associated with anticancer and apoptotic activities [4,5]. Exisulind (Fig. 1) and its analogues (CP78, CP 461, CP 248) have been shown to selectively induce apoptosis in cell lines derived from many cancers including colon, bladder, prostate, breast and lung. They maintained similar rank orders of apoptosis induction, growth inhibition and PDE5 and PDE2 inhibition. They also caused sustained intracellular cGMP increase in the colon tumor cells; thus it is proposed that the cGMP mediated the mechanism underlying the actions of exisulind and its analogues on apoptosis in neoplastic cells [4–6]. These effects in neoplastic cells are not solely dependent on the specific inhibition of PDE5, rather, it is related to non-selective inhibition of the cGMP-PDEs, which may explain why highly selective PDE5 inhibitors do not induce apoptosis in tumor cell lines. Accordingly, it is apparently important to maintain cross-reactivity among PDE isoforms [7].</p><p>In the present work we report the synthesis of novel tadalafil related analogues, evaluate the activity of these compounds as PDE5 inhibitors as well as growth inhibitory agents and determine the correlation between these two activities.</p><!><p>The general synthesis of the target β-carboline-hydantoin and -thiohydantoin derivatives is illustrated in Schemes 1 and 2; meanwhile, the synthesis of the β-carbolines-piperazinedione derivatives is illustrated in Scheme 3.</p><p>Both D-tryptophan and L-tryptophan methyl esters were synthesized by a general synthetic procedure for amino acid esters [8]. The D- and L-Tryptophan methyl esters and 2-bromobenzalde-hyde were subjected to Pictet–Spengler reaction under non-stereo specific conditions to give the corresponding cis- and trans-1,3-disubstituted THBCs (3a–d). The produced cis- and trans-diastereomers of the 1,3-disubistituted THBC were separated by column chromatography using CH2Cl2 as an eluent. The respective pure cis-or trans-isomer was reacted with commercially available ethyl isocyanate to produce the desired cis- and trans-hydantoins (4a–d) meanwhile reaction with ethyl isothiocyanate gave only the corresponding thiohydantoins of the trans-configuration (5a, 5b). Reaction of the respective THBC with chloroacetyl chloride provided the corresponding amide derivative (6a–d). The β-carboline-piperazinedione derivatives with the respective N-alkyl or N-benzyl substituents (7a–10d) were obtained by ring closure of the open amides 6a–d in the presence of primary amines, namely methylamine, ethylamine, butylamine and benzylamine in refluxing methanol.</p><p>The cis/trans stereochemistry for the THBCs (3a–d) was assigned depending on the comprehensive study of 13C NMR spectroscopy data established in previous literature, the signals for C-1 and C-3 in the trans-diastereomers are clearly upfield from those of the corresponding cis-isomers in the carbon spectrum. This is probably due to the 1,3 interactions present in the trans-isomer [9–11]. For the THBCs (3a–d), only the signal of C-1 in the trans-isomer appeared at higher field compared to that of the cis-isomer, with Δ δ ≈ 2–3, no analogous difference was detected with C-3. Regarding the 1H NMR signals for the proton at C-1 of 3a–d, they appeared at δ 5.5–5.7. On cyclization to the hydantoin, thiohydantoin or piper-azinedione derivatives the same proton makes a huge downfield shift to ≈ δ 6.7. This deshielding effect can be explained from the energy minimized form of the particular THBC and its respective hydantoin derivative where in the former case the 2-bromo substituent on the phenyl ring is at the same direction and close to the proton at C-1 (distance ≈ 2.6 Å), formation of the new ring causes the pendant phenyl to rotate around its axis orienting the 2-bromo substituent in different plane far from the respective proton (distance ≈ 4.2 Å), Fig. 2.</p><p>Moreover, a correlation exists between Rf value on TLC and the stereochemistry of the 1,3-disubstituted THBC 3a–d, where cis-isomer is systematically less polar than the trans-isomer while in the hydantoin series, the polarity is reversed, thus, the cis-isomer becomes more polar than the trans-isomer [12]. This is clear from the Rf values of the 1R, 3R; 1S, 3R; 1S, 3S and 1R, 3S of the THBC derivatives 3a–d equal to 0.38; 0.15; 0.39 and 0.14, respectively, meanwhile the Rf value of the corresponding hydantoins 4a–d were 0.38, 0.46, 0.39 and 0.45, respectively. In addition, it was found that the Rf values of β-carboline-piperazinedione derivatives increase with increasing of size of the N-substituent, this may be due to increased lipophilicity.</p><p>During the attempt to synthesize the thiohydantoin series, only the trans-isomers were obtained (5a, 5b). The 13C NMR, 1H NMR spectra, Rf and m.p. for the thiohydantoins obtained on treating the cis- and trans-THBC derived from D-tryptophan with ethyl isothiocyanate, were completely matching with those derived from the trans- and cis-THBCs isomers derived from L-Tryptophan. This observation has been previously reported by others and demonstrates the enantiomeric nature of the two products [11,13,14].</p><p>Mass spectrometry to all derivatives showed the molecular ion peaks at m/z M+ and M+ + 2 due to the isotopic nature of bromine atom. Moreover, the 1.3-disubstituted THBC derivatives 3a–d showed molecular ion peaks that were also the base peaks indicating their stable nature. Mass spectrometry for most hydantoin, thiohydantoin and piperazinedione derivatives showed a base peak at m/z M+ −80 indicating that the bromine atom was the most liable fragment to be lost on electron bombardment.</p><p>The infrared spectra of all derivatives showed bands at ≈3400 cm−1 for the indole N–H stretching. Compounds 3 a–d showed peaks at ≈1750 cm−1 for the ester carbonyl stretching. On the other hand, the β-carboline-hydantoin derivatives 4a–d showed 2 carbonyl stretching peaks at ≈1760 and 1700 Cm−1, as one of the carbonyls is flanked between 2 nitrogen atoms, meanwhile the other is flanked between an N and a C, respectively. The β-carboline-piperazinedione derivatives showed 2 carbonyl stretching peaks at ≈1660 and 1650 cm−1. The relatively lower stretching values of the carbonyls of the 6 membered derivatives relative to the 5-membered derivatives may be explained by the higher ring strain of the smaller ring, leading to higher double bond character of the carbonyl groups.</p><!><p>All compounds and their intermediates were tested for their in vitro tumor cell growth inhibitory activity using the human HT-29 colon tumor cell line as well as their inhibitory properties vs recombinant human PDE5 enzyme.</p><p>HT-29 tumor cell line is also known to express PDE5 and other cGMP degrading PDE isozymes. Most of compounds were evaluated in 2 steps, first, the percentage inhibition at a screening dose of 100 μM was performed in triplicate, then for compounds displaying a percentage of inhibition >70% were evaluated by testing a range of 10 concentrations with at least two replicates per concentration to calculate an IC50 value. For a few compounds, the IC50 was initially determined. The results are summarized in Table 1.</p><p>From these data we conclude that the stereochemistry of C-5 of the β-carboline-hydantoin and β-carboline-thiohydantoin derivatives and C-6 of the β-carboline-piperazinedione derivatives are the most crucial factor for the PDE5 inhibitory activity. In the β-carboline-hydantoins 4a–d, the order of activity is 5R, 11aS (4d) > 5R, 11aR (4a) > 5S, 11aS (4c) >5S, 11aR (4b) and for the piperazinediones, the order of activity is 6R, 12aS > 6R, 12aR > 6S, 12aS > 6S, 12aR. This can be observed by the THBC precursors (3a–d) where the order of their PDE5 inhibitory potency is matched with this stereochemistry. These results are in marked contrast to the results obtained with tadalafil isomers whereby the order of activity is 6R, 12aR > 6R, 12aS > 6S, 12aR > 6S, 12aS [15]. This leads to the assumption that the scope and limitations of such class of compounds are still to be explored. Meanwhile, the effect of the stereochemistry of the chiral carbon derived from the amino acid is of lower impact. Interestingly, the chiral center derived from amino acid with the S configuration (L-tryptophan) may lead to more active isomers than those derived from amino acid with the R configuration (D-tryptophan). This suggests the feasibility of synthesizing active compounds derived from L-tryptophan rather than from D-tryptophan and offers a highly economic advantage as L-tryptophan is much cheaper than D-tryptophan.</p><p>β-Carboline-thiohydantoins are markedly less potent than their corresponding hydantoin congeners, which may be due to the lower electro-negativity of sulfur relative to oxygen, 5a
vs
4b and 5b
vs
4d.</p><p>For the impact of the terminal ring size, viz hydantoins vs piperazinediones, compounds are almost of the same activity. It is apparent that a wide range of N-alkyl or N-aryl groups and possibly other lipophilic functions can be tolerated on the piperazinedione, given that their impact upon activity is almost the same.</p><p>Bromine – a bulky and electronegative substituent – at C-2 of the pendant phenyl still produces highly active compounds in the contrary to what has been previously reported for the 2-methoxy substituent in the β-carboline-hydantoin derivatives [15]. This confirms the necessity to explore the scope and limitations of this class of compounds.</p><p>Molecular modeling studies were performed to dock compound 4d to the human PDE5 using the MOE software [16]. Detailed view showing compounds 4d is able to dock to the active pocket of PDE5 and interact with the side chain of Gln 817 which forms a single, not bidentate, hydrogen bond with the indole NH group of the respective compound. Compounds 4d did not interact with the L-region of the protein and the H pocket is filled with the 2-bromphenyl moiety. The more extensive interactions with the H pocket may be one of the reasons that compound 4d could maintain high affinity to PDE5 without binding to the L region. Interestingly, tadalafil interacts in a very similar fashion, Fig. 3.</p><p>As per the anticancer activity, compounds (6a, 6c and 6d) out of the four open chain amides obtained by the acylation of the NH of the THBC derivatives with chloroacetyl chloride were found to be among the most active growth inhibitory agents with IC50 values of 1.6, 4.1 and 1.6 μM, respectively. However, this activity may be due to the alkyl halide nature and expected toxicity of the respective compounds.</p><p>For this class of compounds, there does not appear to be a correlation between the PDE5 inhibition and tumor cell growth inhibitory activity, as compound 4d the most potent PDE5 inhibitor is not the most potent as compound 6d, which was the most potent compound that inhibited HT-29 tumor cell growth, but did not show PDE5 inhibitory activity. This leads us to hypothesize that other PDE isozymes or possibly PDE5 splice variants may be involved.</p><!><p>Compound 4d derived from L-Tryptophan was the most potent PDE5 inhibitor (IC50 = 0.038 μM) in a series of tadalafil analogues that were synthesized. The results suggest a new direction for further research to synthesize new PDE5 inhibitors with lower cost. The correlation between the PDE5 inhibitory activity and their tumor cell growth inhibitory activity needs further study on other PDE isozymes and splice variants.</p><!><p>All starting materials were commercially available and used without further purification. All reactions were carried out with the use of standard techniques under an inert atmosphere (N2). The analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out on E. Merck 60-F254 precoated silica gel plates and components were usually visualized using UV light, Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (E. Merck, 230–400 mesh). Melting points were determined on Buchi Melting Point apparatus and are uncorrected. Proton NMR (1H NMR) and carbon NMR (13C NMR) spectra were recorded at ambient temperature on Varian Mercury VX-300 MHz spectrometer using tetramethylsilane as internal standard, and proton chemical shifts are expressed in ppm in the indicated solvent. The following abbreviations are used for multiplicity of NMR signals: (s) singlet, (d) doublet, (t) triplet, (q) quadruplet, (dd) double doublet, (m) multiplet. The elemental analyses were performed by the Microanalytical Unit, Faculty of Science, Cairo University; and are within 0.4% of the theoretical value, unless stated otherwise.</p><!><p>The appropriate tryptophan methyl ester (3.42 g, 15.7 mmol) and 2-bromobenzaldehyde (3.19 g, 17.25 mmol) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and cooled to 0 °C in an ice bath. To this solution was added dropwise TFA (1 mL), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 days under N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was then basified with dilute NH4OH solution and extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). The organic layer was washed with water, brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified and the isomers were separated by column chromatography on silica gel eluting with CH2Cl2, to give first the appropriate cis-isomer followed by the trans-one.</p><!><p>White solid; 33%; mp 105–106 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.46 (s, 1H, NH), 7.7–7.68 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.46–7.43 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.33–7.20 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.04–6.93 (m, 2H, Ar), 5.64(s, 1H, CHPh), 3.95–3.91(m, 1H, CHCOOCH3), 3.68 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.07–3.03 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 2.89–2,75 (m, 1H, CHaHb); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 172.88, 140.75, 136.36, 134.16, 132.69, 130.74, 128.02, 126.44, 124.02, 120.94, 118.54, 117.70, 111.32, 107.65, 56.03 (C1), 51.89(C3), 51.85, 25.26; m/z 386 (M+ + 2), m/z 384 (M+, 100%); Anal. (C19H17BrN2O2) C: 59.23, H:4.45, N: 7.27; found: C:59.75, H:4.51, N:7.10.</p><!><p>White solid; 41%; mp 104–105 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.73 (s,1H, NH), 7.69–7.62 (m,1H, Ar), 7.49–7.47 (d,1H, Ar), 7.25–7.22 (m, 4H, Ar), 7.05–6.98 (m, 2H, Ar), 5.67(s, 1H, CHPh), 3.68–3.63 (m, 4H, CHCOOCH3 + OCH3), 3.14–3.08 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 2.90–2,87 (dd, 1H, CHaHb); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 173.53, 141.11, 136.2, 132.93, 130.37, 129.53, 127.47, 126.35, 124.09, 121.12, 118.51, 117.81, 111.19, 107.86, 53.69 (C1), 51.83(C3), 51.36, 24.89; m/z 386 (M+ + 2), m/z 384 (M+, 100%); Anal. (C19H17BrN2O2) C: 59.23, H:4.45, N: 7.27; found; C:59.50, H:4.20, N:7.05.</p><!><p>White solid; 41%; mp 104–105 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.46 (s, 1H, NH),7.70–7.67 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.46–7.43 (d, 1H, Ar),7.33–7.20 (m, 5H, Ar + NH),7.04–6.93 (m, 2H, Ar),5.64 (s,1H, CHPh), 3.93(m, 1H, CHCOOCH3), 3.68 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.07–3.03 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 2.90–2.80 (m, 1H, CHaHb); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 172.80, 136.36, 134.07, 132.64, 130.74, 129.83, 128.01,126.43, 124.02, 120.93, 118.52, 117.67, 115.92, 111.30, 107.63, 56.61(C1), 51.85(C3), 25.20; m/z 386 (M+ + 2), m/z 384.13 (M+, 100%); Anal. (C19H17BrN2O2) C: 59.23, H:4.45, N: 7.27; found: C:59.02, H:4.50, N:7.09.</p><!><p>White solid; 28%; mp 193–195 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 10.71 (s, 1H, NH),7.69–7.67 (t, 1H, Ar), 7.48–7.46 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.24–7.21 (d, 3H, Ar), 7.07–6.95(m, 2H, Ar), 6.76–6.5(m,1H, Ar), 5.66(s,1H, CHPh), 3.67–3.62(m, 4H, CHCOOCH3 + OCH3), 3.13–3.07 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 2.89–2.80 (dd, 1H, CHaHb); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 173.51, 141.10, 136.19, 132.91, 130.35, 129.50, 127.45, 126.34, 124.06, 121.09, 118.48, 117.77, 111.16, 107.83, 53.64(C1), 51.79(C3), 51.35, 24.89; m/z 386 (M+ + 2), m/z 384 (M+, 100%); Anal. (C19H17BrN2O2) C: 59.23, H:4.45, N: 7.27; found: C: 58.94, H:4.58, N:7.11.</p><!><p>Excess Ethyl isocyanate (135 μl, 1.6 mmol) was added to a well stirred solution of the appropriate beta-carboline 3a–d (0.38 g, 1 mmol) in methyl ethyl ketone (10 mL) and the mixture was stirred at reflux for 16 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, the residue was purified using preparative TLC and developed with CH2Cl2, the required band was stripped and dissolved in CH2Cl2 The solution was then filtered to remove the undesired silica, the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain pure powder of desired product.</p><!><p>Buff solid; 55%; mp 210–213 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.85 (s, 1H, NH), 7.66–7.63 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.57–7.54 (m, 1H, Ar),7.25–7.06 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.49(s,1H, CHPh), 4.41–4.37(dd,1H, CHC(O)N), 3.57–3.51 (m, 3H, NCH2 + CHaHb), 3.10–3.01(m, 1H, CHaHb), 1.23–1.18 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z 344 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3O2) C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.69, H:4.34, N:9.96.</p><!><p>yellow solid; 52%; mp 137–138 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.96 (s,1H, NH), 7.67–7.65 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.64–7.55(m, 1H, Ar), 7.28–7.14(m, 6H, Ar), 6.74(s,1H, CHPh), 4.60–4.55(dd,1H, CHC(O)N), 3.63–3.51(m, 3H, NCH2 + CHaHb), 2.93–2.83 (m,1H, CHaHb),1.26–1,21 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z 344 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3O2) C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.19, H:4.34, N:9.92.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 63%; mp 213–214 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.86 (s, 1H, NH), 7.63–7.54 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.27–7.03(m, 6H, Ar), 6.49(s, 1H, CHPh), 4.41–4.37(dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 3.57–3.49(m, 3H, NCH2 + CHaHb), 3.10–3.01(m, 1H, CHaHb), 1.23–1,18 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z 344 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3O2) C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.35, H:4.34, N:10.01.</p><!><p>White solid; 50%; mp 140–141 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.90 (s, 1H, NH), 7.68–7.66 (m,1H, Ar), 7.53–7.52 (m,1H, Ar),7.28–7.14 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.74 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.61–4.56(dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 3.63–3.52 (m, 3H, NCH2 + CHaHb), 2.93–2.84 (m,1H, CHaHb),1.27–1,22 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z, 344 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3O2) C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.39, H:4.19, N:9.88.</p><!><p>Excess Ethyl isothiocyanate (135 μl, 1.5 mmol) was added to a well stirred solution of the appropriate beta-carboline 3a–d (0.38 g, 1 mmol) in methyl ethyl ketone (10 mL) and the mixture was stirred at reflux for 16 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, the residue was purified using preparative TLC and developed with CH2Cl2, the required band was stripped and dissolved in CH2Cl2 The solution was then filtered to remove the undesired silica, the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain pure powder of desired product.</p><!><p>Yellow white solid; 56%; mp 228–229 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.10 (s, 1H, NH), 7.72–7.70 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.54–7.51 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.33–7.13 (m, 7H, Ar + CHPh), 4.82–4.76 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.01–3.94 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.59–3.53 (m,1H CHaHb), 2.95–2.91 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 1.32–1.28 (t, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 180.65, 172.82, 138.27, 137.03, 132.96, 131.00, 129.90, 129.57, 128.23, 125.48, 123.53, 121.75, 119.01, 118.20, 111.76, 105.09, 58.03, 55.91, 35.84, 22.47, 12.71; m/z 441 (M+ + 2), 439 (M+), m/z 360 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3OS) C:57.28, H:4.12, N:9.54; found: C:57.19, H:4.22, N:9.46.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 45%; mp 226–227 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.09 (s,1H, NH), 7.72–7.70 (d,1H, Ar), 7.54–7.52 (d,1H, Ar), 7.30–7.13 (m, 7H, Ar + CHPh), 4.82–4.77 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.01–3.94 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.61–3.49 (m,1H, CHaHb), 2.95–2.91 (m,1H, CHaHb),1.32–1,27 (t, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): δ d 180.65, 172.82, 138.29, 137.04, 132.95, 131.00, 129.89, 129.58, 128.22, 125.48, 123.54, 121.74, 119.00, 118.20, 111.76, 105.09, 58.03, 55.91, 35.84, 22.48, 12.72; m/z 441 (M+ + 2), 439.04 (M+), m/z 360 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3OS) C:57.28, H:4.12, N: 9.54; found: C:57.18, H:4.20, N:9.50.</p><!><p>To a stirred solution of the appropriate β-carboline 3a–d (2.195 g, 5.7 mmol) and NaHCO3 (0.575 g, 6.89 mmol) in CHCl3 (40 mL) was added dropwise chloroacetyl chloride (1.09 mL, 13.69 mmol) under ice cooling. The mixture was then stirred at room temperature under a nitrogen atmosphere for 1 h. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2, washed with a solution of NaHCO3, brine, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was then crystallized from diethyl ether.</p><!><p>White solid; 88%; mp 113–115 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.00 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.88–7.85 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.57–7.54 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.31–7.14 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.73 (s,1H, CHPh), 5.18–5.14 (m, 1H, CHCOOCH3), 4.19–4.15(m, 2H, COCH2Cl), 3.64 (br s, 3H, OCH3), 3.37–3.28 (m, 2H, CH2); m/z 462 (M+ + 2), m/z 460(M+), m/z 385 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrClN2O3). C:54.63, H:3.93, N:6.07; found: C: 54.16, H:4.02, N:6.06.</p><!><p>White solid; 74%; mp 132–135 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.22 (s, 1H, NH), 7.61–7.50 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.28–7.08 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.65 (s,1H, CHPh), 5.31 (br s, 1H, CHCOOCH3), 4.19–4.06 (m, 2H, COCH2Cl), 3.82–3.72 (m, 5H, OCH3 + CH2); m/z 462 (M+ + 2), m/z 460(M+), m/z 383 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrClN2O3). C:54.63, H:3.93, N:6.07; found: C:54.33, H:3.92, N:5.99.</p><!><p>White solid; 83%; mp 112–113 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.97 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.68–7.65 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.57–7.54 (d, 1H, Ar),7.31–7.12 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.73 (s,1H, CHPh), 5.18–5.14(m,1H, CHCOOCH3), 4.19–4.15 (m, 2H, COCH2Cl), 3.64 (br s, 3H, OCH3), 3.37–3.26 (m, 2H, CH2); m/z 462 (M+ + 2), m/z 460(M+), m/z 383 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrClN2O3). C:54.63, H:3.93, N:6.07; found: C:54.66, H:3.89, N:6.03.</p><!><p>White solid; 81%; mp 132–133 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.22 (s, 1H, NH), 7.62–7.50 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.29–7.08 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.65 (s,1H, CHPh), 5.31 (br s,1H, CHCOOCH3), 4.19–4.06 (m, 2H, COCH2Cl), 3.74–3.65 (m, 5H, OCH3 + CH2); m/z 462 (M+ + 2), m/z 460(M+), m/z 385 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrClN2O3). C:54.63, H:3.93, N:6.07; found: C: 54.55, H:3.90, N:6.13.</p><!><p>A solution of the of the appropriate chloroacetyl derivative 6a–d (1.4 mmol, 1 equiv) and the appropriate amine, namely methyl-amine (7a–d); ethylamine (8a–d), butylamine (9a–d); benzylamine (10a–d) (2.8 mmol, 2 equiv) in methanol (25 mL) was heated to reflux under a nitrogen atmosphere for 16 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and the organic layer was washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated to dryness. The crude product was then purified using column chromatography, using CH2Cl2 as an eluent.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 34%; mp 175–178 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.27 (s, 1H, NH), 7.59–7.56 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.31–7.13 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.72(s, 1H, CHPh), 4.43–4.34(m, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.11–3.92 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.32–3.22(m, 1H, CHaHb), 3.09(s,3H, NCH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z 344 (100%) m/z 423; Anal.(C21H18BrN3O2). C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.44, H:4.19, N:9.82.</p><!><p>White solid; 29%; mp 202–204 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.15 (s, 1H, NH), 7.66–7.63 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.54–7.52 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.33–7.13 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.82 (brs,1H, CHPhAr), 4.36–4.31 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.14–4.01 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.52–3.46 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 3.01 (s, 3H, NCH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z 344 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3O2) C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.61, H:4.29, N:9.82.</p><!><p>White powder; 32%; mp 177–178 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.24 (s, 1H, NH), 7.58–7.54 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.30–7.04 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.70 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.41–4.36 (m, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.10–3.91 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.31–3.21 (m,1H, CHaHb), 3.08 (s, 3H, NCH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z 344 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3O2) C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.44, H:4.27, N:9.79.</p><!><p>Greenish white solid; 37%; mp 201–204 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.07 (s, 1H, NH), 7.63–7.52 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.27–7.14 (m,6H, Ar), 6.85 (brs,1H, CHPhAr), 4.37–4.32 (dd,1H, CHC(O)N), 4.14–4.01 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.53–3.46 (dd,1H, CHaHb), 3.01 (s, 3H, NCH3); m/z 425 (M+ + 2), m/z 423 (M+), m/z 344 (100%); Anal. (C21H18BrN3O2) C:59.45, H:4.28, N:9.90; found: C:59.31, H:4.32, N:9.96.</p><!><p>Buff solid; 30%; mp 121–122 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.28 (s, 1H, NH), 7.58–7.55 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.31–7.05 (m,6H, Ar), 6.73 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.42–4.32 (m, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.16–3.96 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.46–3.32 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 3.03–2.93 (m, 2H, NCH2), 1.26–1.21 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 439 (M+ + 2), m/z 437 (M+), m/z 358 (100%) m/z 437; Anal. (C22H20BrN3O2) C: 60.28, H:4.60, N:9.59; found: C:60.40, H:4.57, N:9.48.</p><!><p>White solid; 28%; mp 180–182 °C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): δ 7.95 (s, 1H, NH), 7.68–7.65 (m, 1H, Ar), 7.55–7.53 (d, 1H, Ar), 7.34–7.15 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.85 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.37–4.32 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.15–4.01 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.52–3.47 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 3.03–2.93 (m, 2H, NCH2), 1.23–1.19 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 439 (M+ + 2), m/z 437 (M+), m/z 358 (100%); Anal. (C22H20BrN3O2). C: 60.28, H:4.60, N:9.59; found: C:60.15, H:4.50, N:9.62.</p><!><p>Greenish white solid; 25%; mp 125–127 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.25 (s, 1H, NH), 7.64–7.52(m, 2H, Ar), 7.25–7.11(m,6H, Ar),6.72 (s,1H, CHPh),4.41–4.35 (dd,1H, CHC(O)N),4.15–4.01 (m,3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb),3.52–3.47 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 3.03–2.93 (m, 2H, NCH2), 1.24–1.19 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 439 (M+ + 2), m/z 437 (M+), m/z 358 (100%) m/z 437; Anal. (C22H20BrN3O2). C: 60.28, H:4.60, N:9.59; found: C:60.51, H:4.61, N:9.56.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 30%; mp 179–180 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.99 (s, 1H, NH), 7.66–7.51 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.32–7.13 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.86 (s,1H, CHPh), 4.35–4.29 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.12–3.98 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.51–3.44 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 3.00–2.91 (m, 2H, NCH2), 1.23–1.17 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 439 (M+ + 2), m/z 437 (M+), m/z 358 (100%) m/z 437; Anal. (C22H20BrN3O2) C: 60.28, H:4.60, N:9.59; found: C:60.40, H:4.62, N:9.60.</p><!><p>Greenish white solid; 37%; mp 129–131 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.27 (s, 1H, NH), 7.56–7.53 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.30–7.11(m, 6H, Ar), 6.72 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.41–4.36 (dd,1H, CHC(O)N), 4.14–4.04 (m, 2H, CH2C(O)N), 3.81–3.74 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 3.55–3.46 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 3.31–3.22 (t, 2H, NCH2), 1.64–1.52 (m, 2H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.42–1.33 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 0.98–0.94 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 467 (M+ + 2), m/z 465 (M+), m/z 386 (100%) m/z 465; Anal. (C24H24BrN3O2) C:61.81, H:5.19, N:9.01; found: C:62.01, H:5.20, N:9.04.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 36%; mp 135–136 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.99 (s,1H, NH), 7.65–7.62 (m,1H, Ar), 7.53–7.51 (d,1H, Ar) 7.32–7.13 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.82 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.33–4.39 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.12–3.98 (m, 2H, CH2C(O)N), 3.54–3.44 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.32–3.22 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 3.00–2.91 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 1.60–1.52 (m, 2H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.38–1.25 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 0.97–0.93 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 467(M+ + 2), m/z 465(M+), m/z 217 (100%); Anal. (C24H24BrN3O2) C:61.81, H:5.19, N:9.01; found: C:61.91, H:5.19, N:9.06.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 39%; mp127–130 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.27 (s,1H, NH), 7.57–7.54 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.28–7.11 (m, 6H, Ar),6.72 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.41–4.38 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.14–3.94 (m, 2H, CH2C(O)N), 3.81–3.44(m, 2H, NCH2), 3.46–3.36(m, 1H, CHaHb),3.28–3.20 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 1.64–1.54 (m, 2H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.40–1.33 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 0.99–0.94 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 467(M+ + 2), m/z 465(M+), m/z 217 (100%); Anal. (C24H24BrN3O2) C:61.81, H:5.19, N:9.01; found: C:61.80, H:5.14, N:8.97.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 31%; mp 135–137 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.98 (s, 1H, NH), 7.71–7.53 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.29–7.13 (m, 6H, Ar), 6.82 (s,1H, CHPh), 4.34–4.29 (dd, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.12–3.97 (m, 2H, CH2C(O)N), 3.61–3.44 (m, 2H, NCH2), 3.34–3.21 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 3.00–2.90 (m, 1H, CHaHb), 1.57–1.47 (m, 2H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.35–1.32 (m, 2H, CH2CH3), 0.98–0.91 (t, 3H, CH3); m/z 467 (M+ + 2), m/z 465(M+), m/z 386 (100%); Anal. (C24H24BrN3O2) C:61.81, H:5.19, N:9.01; found: C:61.77, H:5.23, N:9.06.</p><!><p>White solid; 23%; mp 135–137 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.26 (s, 1H, NH), 7.59–7.56 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.56–7.21 (m,11H, Ar), 6.71 (s,1H, CHPh), 4.91–4.83 (m, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.55–4.50 (m, 2H, CH2Ph), 3.95–3.81 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.38–3.28 (m, 1H, CHaHb); m/z 501(M+ + 2), m/z 499(M+), m/z 420 (100%); Anal. (C27H22BrN3O2) C:64.81, H:4.43, N:8.40; found: C:64.98, H:4.52, N:8.49.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 34%; mp 124–127 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.03 (s, 1H, NH), 7.67–7.54 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.38–7.14(m, 11H, Ar), 6.84 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.90–4.85 (m, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.43–4.38 (m, 2H, CH2Ph), 3.95–3.94 (m, 2H, CH2–C(O)N), 3.57–3.51 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 3.04–2.94 (m, 1H, CHaHb); MS: m/z 501 (M+ + 2), m/z 499 (M+), m/z 420 (100%); Anal. (C27H22BrN3O2). C:64.81, H:4.43, N:8.40; found: C:64.98, H:4.57, N:8.38.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 32%; mp 138–140 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 8.26 (s,1H, NH), 7.59–7.50 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.16–7.03 (m,11H, Ar), 6.70 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.93–4.86 (m, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.55–4.42(m, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.01–3.81 (m, 3H, CH2C(O)N + CHaHb), 3.38–3.28 (m,1H, CHaHb); m/z 501 (M+ + 2), m/z 499 (M+), m/z 420 (100%); Anal. (C27H22BrN3O2). C:64.81, H:4.43, N:8.40; found: C:65.08, H:4.32, N:8.40.</p><!><p>Yellowish white solid; 25%; mp 128–130 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 7.95 (s, 1H, NH), 7.63–7.60 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.34–7.13 (m, 11H, Ar), 6.82 (s, 1H, CHPh), 4.89–4.84 (m, 1H, CHC(O)N), 4.56–4.33 (m, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.01–3.87 (m, 2H, CH2C(O)N), 3.71–3.67 (dd, 1H, CHaHb), 3.35–3.28 (m, 1H, CHaHb); m/z 501 (M+ + 2), m/z 499 (M+), m/z 420 (100%); Anal. (C27H22BrN3O2) C:64.81, H:4.43, N:8.40; found: C:64.78, H:4.42, N:8.44.</p><!><p>HT-29 tumor cells were obtained from ATCC. They were grown under standard cell culture conditions at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum. 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 units/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin. Cells were harvested at 70–90% confluence with trypsin/EDTA and used immediately Cell count and viability was determined by Trypan blue staining followed by hemocytometry. Only cultures displaying >95% cell viability were used for experiments [6].</p><!><p>Tissue culture treated microtiter 96-well plates were seeded at a density of 5000 cells/well. The plates were incubated for 18–24 h prior to any treatment. All test compounds were solubilized in 100% DMSO and diluted with media to obtain a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. Cells were dosed. Cell viability was measured 72 h after treatment by the Cell Titer Glo Assay (Promega), which is a luminescent assay that is an indicator of live cells as a function of metabolic activity and ATP content. The assay was performed according to manufacturer's specifications. Luminescence was measured by a Perkin Elmer Victor® multi-label plate reader [6].</p><!><p>5 μ/mL of purified PDE 5 (BPS Biosciences) was added to the wells of black 96-well non-binding plates. Immediately, the protein was treated with compound or vehicle control and 50 nM TAMRA-cGMP (Molecular Devices) were added to each assay well. The plates were incubated for 1.5 h at 30 °C. After incubation, IMAP FP Phosphodiesterase Evaluation Assay (Molecular Devices) binding reagent was added to each well and the plates were incubated for an additional 30 min at 30 °C. FP was measured according to manufacturer's specifications using a Biotek Synergy 4 plate reader.</p><!><p>Drug effects on tumor cell growth and PDE activity were measured and potency was expressed by an IC50 value (50% inhibitory concentration). For growth assays, the IC50 value was determined by testing a range of 8 concentrations with at least four replicates per concentration. For enzyme assays, the IC50 value was determined by testing a range of 10 concentrations with at least two replicates per concentration. Dose–response curves were analyzed using PrismTM 4 software (GraphPad) to calculate IC50 values using a four parameter logistic equation. All in vitro experiments involved dose–response analysis, which was repeated at least twice to confirm reproducibility of IC50 values.</p><!><p>Compound 4d was drawn and subjected to energy minimization by the AM1 procedure, the partial charges are also calculated. The human PDE5 X-ray crystal structure complexed with tadalafil (PDB code: 1UDU) was used for docking experiments. One of the protein chain, metals and the old ligands were deleted. The docking was done with the default settings of the MOE-DOCK [16] as follow: The option: Rotate Bonds was selected to give flexible ligand-rigid receptor docking. The scoring function was London dG with a replacement of Alpha Triangle.</p>