that the non-collegiateness leads to that the African happens and the Eurocentricness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the Iraqi happens. sent2: if the embrowning senator occurs then the Eurocentricness occurs. sent3: that the creating does not occur yields the African. sent4: the non-collegiateness is prevented by that the unclothing introjection does not occur but the creating happens. sent5: the bioclimaticness occurs. sent6: if that the bioclimaticness occurs hold the embrowning senator happens and the call-back does not occur. sent7: that the unclothing introjection does not occur hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the creating happens.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the unclothing introjection does not occur and the creating happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the collegiateness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collegiateness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the creating does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the African occurs.; sent6 & sent5 -> int6: the embrowning senator but not the call-back occurs.; int6 -> int7: the embrowning senator happens.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the Eurocentricness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the African and the Eurocentricness occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the non-collegiateness leads to that the African happens and the Eurocentricness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Iraqi happens. sent2: if the embrowning senator occurs then the Eurocentricness occurs. sent3: that the creating does not occur yields the African. sent4: the non-collegiateness is prevented by that the unclothing introjection does not occur but the creating happens. sent5: the bioclimaticness occurs. sent6: if that the bioclimaticness occurs hold the embrowning senator happens and the call-back does not occur. sent7: that the unclothing introjection does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the creating happens.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the unclothing introjection does not occur and the creating happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the collegiateness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collegiateness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the creating does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the African occurs.; sent6 & sent5 -> int6: the embrowning senator but not the call-back occurs.; int6 -> int7: the embrowning senator happens.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the Eurocentricness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the African and the Eurocentricness occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__