the fact that the Syrian bakes and is apophyseal is incorrect.
sent1: the Syrian is Taiwanese if the suggester is both a Chara and not a Bathyergus. sent2: something is not Taiwanese if it is both a Dirca and a Honiara. sent3: the carcinogen is a kind of a Honiara. sent4: the fact that something bakes and it is apophyseal is not true if it is not a Dirca. sent5: the Syrian does bake and is apophyseal if the suggester is not a kind of a Dirca. sent6: the fact that that the coupling is not a Chara but it is a kind of a Taiwanese is not incorrect is wrong. sent7: if the angelim does palatalize Luba that the adapter does not deflower Arauca but it smoothens does not hold. sent8: that the suggester is a kind of a Dirca but it does not palatalize coupling is incorrect. sent9: if something is cataclinal then it does palatalize Luba. sent10: the Syrian is monatomic. sent11: if there is something such that it either palatalizes jaguar or does not jacket ampere-hour or both then the angelim is cataclinal. sent12: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Chara and it is a Taiwanese is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not bake and is a kind of a Chara does not hold. sent14: the Syrian is apophyseal if the suggester is not a Dirca. sent15: if something is not a delicacy it is greater. sent16: the fact that the coupling is a kind of a Taiwanese that is not a kind of a Dirca is not true. sent17: there is something such that it does palatalize jaguar and/or does not jacket ampere-hour. sent18: if there is something such that that it is not a Chara and not a Taiwanese is not right then the suggester is Taiwanese. sent19: something is not a Chara and is not a Taiwanese. sent20: the fact that the coupling is not a Chara and not Taiwanese does not hold. sent21: the coupling is not a kind of a delicacy if that the adapter does not deflower Arauca and does smoothen is incorrect. sent22: the suggester is a Honiara. sent23: the suggester does bake.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suggester is a Dirca.; assump1 & sent22 -> int1: the suggester is a kind of a Dirca that is a Honiara.; sent2 -> int2: if the suggester is a kind of a Dirca and it is a kind of a Honiara it is not a Taiwanese.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the suggester is not a Taiwanese.; sent20 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is both not a Chara and not Taiwanese is incorrect.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the suggester is Taiwanese.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the suggester is not a Dirca.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Syrian bakes and it is apophyseal is incorrect.
sent4 -> int8: that the Syrian does bake and is apophyseal is incorrect if it is not a Dirca.; sent15 -> int9: the coupling is greater if it is not a kind of a delicacy.; sent9 -> int10: the angelim palatalizes Luba if it is cataclinal.; sent17 & sent11 -> int11: the angelim is cataclinal.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the angelim palatalizes Luba.; sent7 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the adapter does not deflower Arauca but it smoothens is not correct.; sent21 & int13 -> int14: the coupling is not a delicacy.; int9 & int14 -> int15: the coupling is greater.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is greater.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Syrian bakes and is apophyseal is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Syrian is Taiwanese if the suggester is both a Chara and not a Bathyergus. sent2: something is not Taiwanese if it is both a Dirca and a Honiara. sent3: the carcinogen is a kind of a Honiara. sent4: the fact that something bakes and it is apophyseal is not true if it is not a Dirca. sent5: the Syrian does bake and is apophyseal if the suggester is not a kind of a Dirca. sent6: the fact that that the coupling is not a Chara but it is a kind of a Taiwanese is not incorrect is wrong. sent7: if the angelim does palatalize Luba that the adapter does not deflower Arauca but it smoothens does not hold. sent8: that the suggester is a kind of a Dirca but it does not palatalize coupling is incorrect. sent9: if something is cataclinal then it does palatalize Luba. sent10: the Syrian is monatomic. sent11: if there is something such that it either palatalizes jaguar or does not jacket ampere-hour or both then the angelim is cataclinal. sent12: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a Chara and it is a Taiwanese is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it does not bake and is a kind of a Chara does not hold. sent14: the Syrian is apophyseal if the suggester is not a Dirca. sent15: if something is not a delicacy it is greater. sent16: the fact that the coupling is a kind of a Taiwanese that is not a kind of a Dirca is not true. sent17: there is something such that it does palatalize jaguar and/or does not jacket ampere-hour. sent18: if there is something such that that it is not a Chara and not a Taiwanese is not right then the suggester is Taiwanese. sent19: something is not a Chara and is not a Taiwanese. sent20: the fact that the coupling is not a Chara and not Taiwanese does not hold. sent21: the coupling is not a kind of a delicacy if that the adapter does not deflower Arauca and does smoothen is incorrect. sent22: the suggester is a Honiara. sent23: the suggester does bake. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suggester is a Dirca.; assump1 & sent22 -> int1: the suggester is a kind of a Dirca that is a Honiara.; sent2 -> int2: if the suggester is a kind of a Dirca and it is a kind of a Honiara it is not a Taiwanese.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the suggester is not a Taiwanese.; sent20 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is both not a Chara and not Taiwanese is incorrect.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the suggester is Taiwanese.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the suggester is not a Dirca.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__