either the Methodists does not occur or the syndication does not occur or both.
sent1: that the bridgeableness and the skiing occurs prevents that the arrest occurs. sent2: the turfing priorship does not occur. sent3: the bridgeableness and the skiing happens. sent4: the quivering happens. sent5: if not the arrest but the jactitation happens the alteration does not occur. sent6: if the jactitation does not occur then the fact that the inadequateness does not occur is correct. sent7: the fact that if the inadequateness does not occur then the Methodistsness does not occur or the syndication does not occur or both is not false. sent8: the elective does not occur. sent9: the appreciating occurs. sent10: if the civicness does not occur the alteration happens. sent11: the civicness does not occur if that the non-retrorseness or the defalcation or both happens does not hold. sent12: that the non-retrorseness and/or the defalcation occurs is not right. sent13: that the Methodists does not occur or the syndication or both is caused by that the inadequateness does not occur.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the arrest does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jactitation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the arrest does not occur and the jactitation happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the alteration does not occur.; sent11 & sent12 -> int4: the civicness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the alteration occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the jactitation does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the inadequateness does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the Methodistsness does not occur and/or the syndication does not occur is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = either the Methodists does not occur or the syndication does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bridgeableness and the skiing occurs prevents that the arrest occurs. sent2: the turfing priorship does not occur. sent3: the bridgeableness and the skiing happens. sent4: the quivering happens. sent5: if not the arrest but the jactitation happens the alteration does not occur. sent6: if the jactitation does not occur then the fact that the inadequateness does not occur is correct. sent7: the fact that if the inadequateness does not occur then the Methodistsness does not occur or the syndication does not occur or both is not false. sent8: the elective does not occur. sent9: the appreciating occurs. sent10: if the civicness does not occur the alteration happens. sent11: the civicness does not occur if that the non-retrorseness or the defalcation or both happens does not hold. sent12: that the non-retrorseness and/or the defalcation occurs is not right. sent13: that the Methodists does not occur or the syndication or both is caused by that the inadequateness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the arrest does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jactitation happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the arrest does not occur and the jactitation happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the alteration does not occur.; sent11 & sent12 -> int4: the civicness does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: the alteration occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the jactitation does not occur.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the inadequateness does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__