the reincarnation is suctorial.
sent1: the reincarnation is suctorial thing that is phyllodial if the ordainer is not annexational. sent2: if the Fuji strains or it is a appellant or both the ordainer is not annexational. sent3: the Fuji is a Bohemian. sent4: if the ordainer is not annexational the reincarnation is phyllodial. sent5: the reincarnation is phyllodial. sent6: the fact that something is a appellant but not a strained is not correct if it is annexational. sent7: if something is not phyllodial that it is a kind of annexational thing that is a appellant is not true. sent8: the ordainer is not annexational if the Fuji is a kind of a appellant. sent9: if that the Fuji is not a criminology and it is not a Chechen does not hold it is not phyllodial. sent10: the fact that the Fuji is not a criminology and is non-Chechen is wrong. sent11: the Fuji is Bohemian and it is a strained.
sent11 -> int1: the Fuji does strain.; int1 -> int2: the Fuji either is a strained or is a appellant or both.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the ordainer is not annexational.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the reincarnation is suctorial and it is phyllodial.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the platinum is not Bohemian.
sent6 -> int5: that the ordainer is both a appellant and not a strained is not right if it is annexational.;
$hypothesis$ = the reincarnation is suctorial. ; $context$ = sent1: the reincarnation is suctorial thing that is phyllodial if the ordainer is not annexational. sent2: if the Fuji strains or it is a appellant or both the ordainer is not annexational. sent3: the Fuji is a Bohemian. sent4: if the ordainer is not annexational the reincarnation is phyllodial. sent5: the reincarnation is phyllodial. sent6: the fact that something is a appellant but not a strained is not correct if it is annexational. sent7: if something is not phyllodial that it is a kind of annexational thing that is a appellant is not true. sent8: the ordainer is not annexational if the Fuji is a kind of a appellant. sent9: if that the Fuji is not a criminology and it is not a Chechen does not hold it is not phyllodial. sent10: the fact that the Fuji is not a criminology and is non-Chechen is wrong. sent11: the Fuji is Bohemian and it is a strained. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the Fuji does strain.; int1 -> int2: the Fuji either is a strained or is a appellant or both.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the ordainer is not annexational.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the reincarnation is suctorial and it is phyllodial.; int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__