the clamor does not occur.
sent1: that the salving espresso occurs is prevented by the non-photovoltaicness. sent2: the shearing does not occur and the voice does not occur. sent3: the convocation does not occur. sent4: the emerging does not occur and the salving espresso does not occur if the photovoltaicness does not occur. sent5: the hospitalization happens. sent6: both the airing and the theoterrorism happens. sent7: the mission does not occur. sent8: the specification does not occur and the overflight does not occur. sent9: the photovoltaicness does not occur. sent10: the airing occurs. sent11: the fact that not the emerging but the clamor happens is not right if the theoterrorism occurs. sent12: that both the non-interstellarness and the shears happens does not hold. sent13: the salving espresso does not occur.
sent4 & sent9 -> int1: the emerging does not occur and the salving espresso does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the emerging does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clamoring occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the emerging does not occur and the clamor happens.; sent6 -> int4: that the theoterrorism occurs is right.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the fact that that the emerging does not occur but the clamoring occurs is not correct is true.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the clamor does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the salving espresso occurs is prevented by the non-photovoltaicness. sent2: the shearing does not occur and the voice does not occur. sent3: the convocation does not occur. sent4: the emerging does not occur and the salving espresso does not occur if the photovoltaicness does not occur. sent5: the hospitalization happens. sent6: both the airing and the theoterrorism happens. sent7: the mission does not occur. sent8: the specification does not occur and the overflight does not occur. sent9: the photovoltaicness does not occur. sent10: the airing occurs. sent11: the fact that not the emerging but the clamor happens is not right if the theoterrorism occurs. sent12: that both the non-interstellarness and the shears happens does not hold. sent13: the salving espresso does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent9 -> int1: the emerging does not occur and the salving espresso does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the emerging does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clamoring occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the emerging does not occur and the clamor happens.; sent6 -> int4: that the theoterrorism occurs is right.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the fact that that the emerging does not occur but the clamoring occurs is not correct is true.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__