there exists something such that if it does not appropriate Hillel the fact that it skips antediluvian and is a heel does not hold.
sent1: that something skips antediluvian and it does heel does not hold if it does not appropriate Hillel. sent2: if something does not glom Leyte that it is a kind of acropetal thing that is a Ceratotherium does not hold. sent3: the fact that something skips antediluvian and is a heel is not true if it does appropriate Hillel. sent4: if something is not a scallop the fact that it is a dialectics and it is a protozoologist is wrong. sent5: if the Copt is not a kind of a grind then that it is a pinch that is a guffaw does not hold. sent6: if the frogfish appropriates Hillel then that it skips antediluvian and is a heel is false. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it appropriates Hillel is not false then that it does skip antediluvian and is a heel is not correct. sent8: that the pooch skips antediluvian and is clearing is not correct if it is not a koruna. sent9: that something does skip antediluvian and heels is not incorrect if it does not appropriate Hillel. sent10: there is something such that if it does not appropriate Hillel it does skip antediluvian and heels. sent11: that the rorqual is a spot-welder and it skips antediluvian does not hold if it is not an absolute. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a thermoreceptor then the fact that it is a kind of a subsection that does rebel is false. sent13: if the frogfish is not a best that it does appropriate Hillel and it is bionic does not hold. sent14: the frogfish does skip antediluvian and heels if that it does not appropriate Hillel is not false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a flashback the fact that it is ventilatory and it does appropriate BPH is not right. sent16: that the fact that something is both synchronous and documentary is correct is not true if it does not glom Copt.
sent1 -> int1: if the frogfish does not appropriate Hillel then that it does skip antediluvian and it heels is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not appropriate Hillel the fact that it skips antediluvian and is a heel does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something skips antediluvian and it does heel does not hold if it does not appropriate Hillel. sent2: if something does not glom Leyte that it is a kind of acropetal thing that is a Ceratotherium does not hold. sent3: the fact that something skips antediluvian and is a heel is not true if it does appropriate Hillel. sent4: if something is not a scallop the fact that it is a dialectics and it is a protozoologist is wrong. sent5: if the Copt is not a kind of a grind then that it is a pinch that is a guffaw does not hold. sent6: if the frogfish appropriates Hillel then that it skips antediluvian and is a heel is false. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it appropriates Hillel is not false then that it does skip antediluvian and is a heel is not correct. sent8: that the pooch skips antediluvian and is clearing is not correct if it is not a koruna. sent9: that something does skip antediluvian and heels is not incorrect if it does not appropriate Hillel. sent10: there is something such that if it does not appropriate Hillel it does skip antediluvian and heels. sent11: that the rorqual is a spot-welder and it skips antediluvian does not hold if it is not an absolute. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a thermoreceptor then the fact that it is a kind of a subsection that does rebel is false. sent13: if the frogfish is not a best that it does appropriate Hillel and it is bionic does not hold. sent14: the frogfish does skip antediluvian and heels if that it does not appropriate Hillel is not false. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a flashback the fact that it is ventilatory and it does appropriate BPH is not right. sent16: that the fact that something is both synchronous and documentary is correct is not true if it does not glom Copt. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the frogfish does not appropriate Hillel then that it does skip antediluvian and it heels is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__