the Mandaeanness happens if the permitting siskin happens.
sent1: if that the stigmatizing variety does not occur is not false then that both the non-correlationalness and the sawm happens is false. sent2: the uncivilness occurs. sent3: the eye does not occur if both the TPN and the Barbadianness happens. sent4: the Anglophilicness occurs if the authentication happens. sent5: both the travelogue and the angling happens. sent6: the elaborating does not occur. sent7: the fact that the correlationalness and the sawm occurs does not hold if the stigmatizing variety does not occur. sent8: both the Germanism and the screwball happens. sent9: that the correlationalness and the sawm occurs does not hold. sent10: the acceptance and the semiautobiographicalness occurs. sent11: the mediating does not occur. sent12: the nonresidentialness happens if that the audio-lingualness does not occur and the grind occurs is not true. sent13: both the grouching and the suiting happens. sent14: the battue happens. sent15: that the glamorization happens brings about that the overstrain occurs. sent16: if that the non-correlationalness and the sawm happens is wrong then the Mandaean happens. sent17: the approval does not occur if the authentication occurs and the Gregorianness happens. sent18: the fact that the permitting lull occurs and the literateness happens is true. sent19: the transfusion does not occur. sent20: that the chug happens hold. sent21: the travelogue happens. sent22: that the Mandaean occurs is caused by that the correlationalness occurs. sent23: the Audenesqueness happens.
sent5 -> int1: the angling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the permitting siskin happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the angling and the permitting siskin happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the Mandaeanness happens if the permitting siskin happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the stigmatizing variety does not occur is not false then that both the non-correlationalness and the sawm happens is false. sent2: the uncivilness occurs. sent3: the eye does not occur if both the TPN and the Barbadianness happens. sent4: the Anglophilicness occurs if the authentication happens. sent5: both the travelogue and the angling happens. sent6: the elaborating does not occur. sent7: the fact that the correlationalness and the sawm occurs does not hold if the stigmatizing variety does not occur. sent8: both the Germanism and the screwball happens. sent9: that the correlationalness and the sawm occurs does not hold. sent10: the acceptance and the semiautobiographicalness occurs. sent11: the mediating does not occur. sent12: the nonresidentialness happens if that the audio-lingualness does not occur and the grind occurs is not true. sent13: both the grouching and the suiting happens. sent14: the battue happens. sent15: that the glamorization happens brings about that the overstrain occurs. sent16: if that the non-correlationalness and the sawm happens is wrong then the Mandaean happens. sent17: the approval does not occur if the authentication occurs and the Gregorianness happens. sent18: the fact that the permitting lull occurs and the literateness happens is true. sent19: the transfusion does not occur. sent20: that the chug happens hold. sent21: the travelogue happens. sent22: that the Mandaean occurs is caused by that the correlationalness occurs. sent23: the Audenesqueness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the angling occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the permitting siskin happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the angling and the permitting siskin happens.; __UNKNOWN__