the angioscope is a millicurie.
sent1: something is a crossbencher and does not temper appetizer if the fact that it is a stiff is correct. sent2: that the malacopterygian is not a kind of a honey is not false. sent3: the malacopterygian is not a kind of a canola if it is a crossbencher and is not amaurotic. sent4: if the acorn does temper skyrocket the malacopterygian is a crossbencher. sent5: something does not defray turning if it does not temper skyrocket. sent6: the acorn is not amaurotic if the angioscope is both not a ignorantness and not a canola. sent7: the acorn is not a ignorantness. sent8: the angioscope does not defray Cotacachi if the malacopterygian is a ignorantness and does not defray turning. sent9: the angioscope is not a ignorantness. sent10: that the angioscope does not temper skyrocket is not incorrect. sent11: either the malacopterygian is a canola or it does temper skyrocket or both. sent12: the acorn is a stiff and/or tempers skyrocket. sent13: something is not a ignorantness if it does not temper skyrocket. sent14: the malacopterygian does not defray angioscope. sent15: the malacopterygian is not amaurotic. sent16: the malacopterygian is a kind of a crossbencher if the acorn is a stiff. sent17: something is not a millicurie if it does not defray Cotacachi. sent18: the acorn does not defray Cotacachi if the angioscope does temper skyrocket and is stiff. sent19: if the acorn is not amaurotic then it is a stiff and it does not defray Cotacachi. sent20: if the malacopterygian is not a canola it is a kind of a ignorantness and it does not defray turning. sent21: if the acorn is not a crossbencher then the fact that it is not a kind of a Ottoman hold. sent22: the angioscope is not a canola if it is both a crossbencher and not a millicurie.
sent12 & sent16 & sent4 -> int1: the malacopterygian is a kind of a crossbencher.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the malacopterygian is a crossbencher and not amaurotic.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the malacopterygian is not a canola.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the malacopterygian is a kind of a ignorantness but it does not defray turning.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the angioscope does not defray Cotacachi.; sent17 -> int6: the angioscope is not a millicurie if it does not defray Cotacachi.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the Shylock is a kind of a crossbencher that does not temper appetizer.
sent1 -> int7: if the Shylock is a stiff then it is a crossbencher and does not temper appetizer.;
$hypothesis$ = the angioscope is a millicurie. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a crossbencher and does not temper appetizer if the fact that it is a stiff is correct. sent2: that the malacopterygian is not a kind of a honey is not false. sent3: the malacopterygian is not a kind of a canola if it is a crossbencher and is not amaurotic. sent4: if the acorn does temper skyrocket the malacopterygian is a crossbencher. sent5: something does not defray turning if it does not temper skyrocket. sent6: the acorn is not amaurotic if the angioscope is both not a ignorantness and not a canola. sent7: the acorn is not a ignorantness. sent8: the angioscope does not defray Cotacachi if the malacopterygian is a ignorantness and does not defray turning. sent9: the angioscope is not a ignorantness. sent10: that the angioscope does not temper skyrocket is not incorrect. sent11: either the malacopterygian is a canola or it does temper skyrocket or both. sent12: the acorn is a stiff and/or tempers skyrocket. sent13: something is not a ignorantness if it does not temper skyrocket. sent14: the malacopterygian does not defray angioscope. sent15: the malacopterygian is not amaurotic. sent16: the malacopterygian is a kind of a crossbencher if the acorn is a stiff. sent17: something is not a millicurie if it does not defray Cotacachi. sent18: the acorn does not defray Cotacachi if the angioscope does temper skyrocket and is stiff. sent19: if the acorn is not amaurotic then it is a stiff and it does not defray Cotacachi. sent20: if the malacopterygian is not a canola it is a kind of a ignorantness and it does not defray turning. sent21: if the acorn is not a crossbencher then the fact that it is not a kind of a Ottoman hold. sent22: the angioscope is not a canola if it is both a crossbencher and not a millicurie. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent16 & sent4 -> int1: the malacopterygian is a kind of a crossbencher.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the malacopterygian is a crossbencher and not amaurotic.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the malacopterygian is not a canola.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the malacopterygian is a kind of a ignorantness but it does not defray turning.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the angioscope does not defray Cotacachi.; sent17 -> int6: the angioscope is not a millicurie if it does not defray Cotacachi.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__