the streusel does not retouch fingertip.
sent1: the cyclooxygenase-1 is both a looting and not indulgent if it is garlicky. sent2: if the kingfisher is a kind of a Bultmann and is not a kind of an operative then that the fingertip does not retouch affability is true. sent3: the streusel is not a ageism if the fingertip does not clangor Constance and it is not a ageism. sent4: something retouches fingertip if it is not noncurrent. sent5: something that does not retouch affability does retouch broad and is a kind of a actinometry. sent6: the tyrosine is a ageism. sent7: if the cyclooxygenase-1 is a looting but it is not indulgent then the gidgee is indulgent. sent8: if something retouches fingertip it is a ageism. sent9: something does not retouch fingertip and is not a current if it is not a kind of a ageism. sent10: the streusel is undulatory if it is a looting. sent11: something does not clangor Constance and is not a ageism if it does retouch broad. sent12: the streusel is a ageism. sent13: the streusel is a kind of a current and it is a ageism. sent14: the kingfisher is a kind of a tumefaction if the fact that the gidgee is indulgent is not incorrect. sent15: something is a kind of a Bultmann but it is not an operative if the fact that it is a kind of a tumefaction is not false.
sent13 -> int1: the fact that the streusel is a current is not wrong.; sent4 -> int2: the streusel does retouch fingertip if it is a current.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the streusel does not retouch fingertip.
sent9 -> int3: the streusel does not retouch fingertip and is not a current if it is not a kind of a ageism.; sent11 -> int4: if the fingertip does retouch broad then it does not clangor Constance and it is not a kind of a ageism.; sent5 -> int5: if the fingertip does not retouch affability it does retouch broad and it is a actinometry.; sent15 -> int6: the kingfisher is both a Bultmann and not an operative if it is a tumefaction.;
$hypothesis$ = the streusel does not retouch fingertip. ; $context$ = sent1: the cyclooxygenase-1 is both a looting and not indulgent if it is garlicky. sent2: if the kingfisher is a kind of a Bultmann and is not a kind of an operative then that the fingertip does not retouch affability is true. sent3: the streusel is not a ageism if the fingertip does not clangor Constance and it is not a ageism. sent4: something retouches fingertip if it is not noncurrent. sent5: something that does not retouch affability does retouch broad and is a kind of a actinometry. sent6: the tyrosine is a ageism. sent7: if the cyclooxygenase-1 is a looting but it is not indulgent then the gidgee is indulgent. sent8: if something retouches fingertip it is a ageism. sent9: something does not retouch fingertip and is not a current if it is not a kind of a ageism. sent10: the streusel is undulatory if it is a looting. sent11: something does not clangor Constance and is not a ageism if it does retouch broad. sent12: the streusel is a ageism. sent13: the streusel is a kind of a current and it is a ageism. sent14: the kingfisher is a kind of a tumefaction if the fact that the gidgee is indulgent is not incorrect. sent15: something is a kind of a Bultmann but it is not an operative if the fact that it is a kind of a tumefaction is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the fact that the streusel is a current is not wrong.; sent4 -> int2: the streusel does retouch fingertip if it is a current.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__