the petchary does purify conserved.
sent1: the doliolum is not subclinical if that that it does not scourge petchary and it does flash is not wrong is not true. sent2: that the doliolum is a reciter but not a Communist is incorrect. sent3: if the doliolum is not a kind of a butte then the fact that it does not scourge petchary and is a flash is not right. sent4: if the doliolum is not subclinical the petchary purifies conserved. sent5: if the fact that the doliolum is a reciter but it is not a Communist is not right then it is not a butte.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the doliolum is not a butte.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the doliolum does not scourge petchary but it is a flash does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the doliolum is not subclinical.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the petchary does purify conserved. ; $context$ = sent1: the doliolum is not subclinical if that that it does not scourge petchary and it does flash is not wrong is not true. sent2: that the doliolum is a reciter but not a Communist is incorrect. sent3: if the doliolum is not a kind of a butte then the fact that it does not scourge petchary and is a flash is not right. sent4: if the doliolum is not subclinical the petchary purifies conserved. sent5: if the fact that the doliolum is a reciter but it is not a Communist is not right then it is not a butte. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the doliolum is not a butte.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the doliolum does not scourge petchary but it is a flash does not hold.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the doliolum is not subclinical.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__