the kasha is not anticyclonic.
sent1: the millpond is a flunky and/or it is not anticyclonic if it is psychological. sent2: the okra does persist orangewood but it is not a sconce if that it pockets is not wrong. sent3: if either the millpond prioritizes Kolam or it is not leptosporangiate or both then it is not leptosporangiate. sent4: the millpond is not wingless. sent5: if something is not a kind of a Verner it prioritizes Kolam and/or it is non-leptosporangiate. sent6: if the fact that the millpond is a kind of a Ceylonite and/or is not toeless is wrong then the fact that it is not a kind of a Verner is not wrong. sent7: something blisters but it does not confine Leucanthemum if it is not a pocket. sent8: that the okra does pocket is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that it does persist orangewood. sent10: there is something such that it is not a sconce. sent11: the okra is not a kind of a sconce. sent12: if there is something such that that it is not leptosporangiate is correct then that the okra is a flunky and it is psychological is not true. sent13: the okra is not a kind of a sconce if it is a kind of a pocket. sent14: if there is something such that it persists orangewood and is not a sconce the kasha is anticyclonic. sent15: something persists orangewood and it is a sconce. sent16: if something does not pocket it is not anticyclonic. sent17: if something is not wingless the fact that it is a Ceylonite and/or it is not toeless is wrong.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the okra persists orangewood and is not a kind of a sconce.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it persists orangewood and it is not a kind of a sconce.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the kasha is not anticyclonic.
sent16 -> int3: if the kasha does not pocket then the fact that it is not anticyclonic hold.; sent5 -> int4: either the millpond prioritizes Kolam or it is not leptosporangiate or both if it is not a kind of a Verner.; sent17 -> int5: if the millpond is not wingless then that it either is a Ceylonite or is not toeless or both is not correct.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the millpond is a kind of a Ceylonite or it is not toeless or both is false.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the millpond is not a kind of a Verner.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the millpond does prioritize Kolam and/or it is not leptosporangiate.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the millpond is not leptosporangiate.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is not leptosporangiate.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the fact that the okra is both a flunky and psychological is not correct.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a flunky and it is not non-psychological is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the kasha is not anticyclonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the millpond is a flunky and/or it is not anticyclonic if it is psychological. sent2: the okra does persist orangewood but it is not a sconce if that it pockets is not wrong. sent3: if either the millpond prioritizes Kolam or it is not leptosporangiate or both then it is not leptosporangiate. sent4: the millpond is not wingless. sent5: if something is not a kind of a Verner it prioritizes Kolam and/or it is non-leptosporangiate. sent6: if the fact that the millpond is a kind of a Ceylonite and/or is not toeless is wrong then the fact that it is not a kind of a Verner is not wrong. sent7: something blisters but it does not confine Leucanthemum if it is not a pocket. sent8: that the okra does pocket is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that it does persist orangewood. sent10: there is something such that it is not a sconce. sent11: the okra is not a kind of a sconce. sent12: if there is something such that that it is not leptosporangiate is correct then that the okra is a flunky and it is psychological is not true. sent13: the okra is not a kind of a sconce if it is a kind of a pocket. sent14: if there is something such that it persists orangewood and is not a sconce the kasha is anticyclonic. sent15: something persists orangewood and it is a sconce. sent16: if something does not pocket it is not anticyclonic. sent17: if something is not wingless the fact that it is a Ceylonite and/or it is not toeless is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the okra persists orangewood and is not a kind of a sconce.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it persists orangewood and it is not a kind of a sconce.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__