the fact that the moonshine is not a Lermontov is correct.
sent1: something is not econometrics but it does chrome. sent2: there exists something such that it is faecal and/or it is econometrics. sent3: the moonshine is a ragsorter if there exists something such that the fact that it does not disguise mamo and is an overlay is false. sent4: if the moonshine is econometrics and is a ragsorter it is not a kind of a chrome. sent5: the moonshine is not a Lermontov if it is not a chrome and it is not a prominence. sent6: if there is something such that it is faecal or it is econometrics or both then the moonshine is econometrics. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Lermontov and/or it is a prominence. sent8: the fact that the moonshine is not a prominence is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it does not disguise mamo and it is an overlay is wrong. sent10: something chromes and it is a ragsorter if it is non-econometrics. sent11: the moonshine does not barricade Scolopax and it is not faecal. sent12: if the stable is not faecal then that the helmet is a prominence but it does not chrome is false.
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: that the moonshine is a ragsorter is correct.; sent2 & sent6 -> int2: the moonshine is econometrics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the moonshine is econometrics and a ragsorter.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the moonshine is not a chrome.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the moonshine is not a chrome and not a prominence.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the moonshine is a kind of a Lermontov.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the moonshine is not a Lermontov is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not econometrics but it does chrome. sent2: there exists something such that it is faecal and/or it is econometrics. sent3: the moonshine is a ragsorter if there exists something such that the fact that it does not disguise mamo and is an overlay is false. sent4: if the moonshine is econometrics and is a ragsorter it is not a kind of a chrome. sent5: the moonshine is not a Lermontov if it is not a chrome and it is not a prominence. sent6: if there is something such that it is faecal or it is econometrics or both then the moonshine is econometrics. sent7: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Lermontov and/or it is a prominence. sent8: the fact that the moonshine is not a prominence is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it does not disguise mamo and it is an overlay is wrong. sent10: something chromes and it is a ragsorter if it is non-econometrics. sent11: the moonshine does not barricade Scolopax and it is not faecal. sent12: if the stable is not faecal then that the helmet is a prominence but it does not chrome is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: that the moonshine is a ragsorter is correct.; sent2 & sent6 -> int2: the moonshine is econometrics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the moonshine is econometrics and a ragsorter.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the moonshine is not a chrome.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the moonshine is not a chrome and not a prominence.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__