there is something such that if it is not a kind of a lobby then the fact that the fact that it is a historicism and it is not a Sphyrna is not wrong is wrong.
sent1: if that the commissionaire is a lobby is not wrong the fact that it is a historicism but not a Sphyrna does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not sympathize that it is a dekaliter but not medical does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a lobby that it is a historicism and it is not a Sphyrna does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the commissionaire is not a lobby is right the fact that it is a kind of a historicism that is not a Sphyrna is not true. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a lobby then it is a historicism and it is not a Sphyrna. sent6: there is something such that if it does not gripe Danu the fact that it is a kind of a pond that is not a survivalist does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a lobby that it is a historicism that is a kind of a Sphyrna does not hold. sent8: that the clapboard is anastigmatic but not zoological is not true if it is not a lobby. sent9: if that something is not a kind of a tanga is right then that it is a kind of a podetium and it is not an asymptote is false. sent10: the commissionaire is a kind of a historicism that is not a Sphyrna if it is not a kind of a lobby. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Andrews the fact that it is a sway and it is not a tanga is not true. sent12: that the commissionaire is Bogartian and is not zoological is not true if it is not acetic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not weatherly then the fact that it is a spot and it does not gripe licorice is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a copepod that it does bargain centimo and it is not a blitz does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not bargain ammonia the fact that it is an interplay and it is not a Psocoptera is incorrect. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a pastrami then the fact that it bargains Webster and does not gripe craps is false. sent17: if the commissionaire is not a kind of a Sphyrna that it does seam oocyte and it does not gripe clue is false. sent18: if the commissionaire does not lobby the fact that it is a kind of a historicism and it is a kind of a Sphyrna does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not an interplay the fact that it is a Ursidae and it is not washable is false. sent20: if the commissionaire is not a historicism then that it is unpropitious and it is not a kind of a prolegomenon is wrong. sent21: there is something such that if it is not point-of-sale that it does caricature Uzi and it does not spot is false.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a tanga that the fact that it is a podetium and it is not an asymptote is not incorrect does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: the fact that the nugget is a podetium and is not an asymptote is false if it is not a tanga.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a lobby then the fact that the fact that it is a historicism and it is not a Sphyrna is not wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the commissionaire is a lobby is not wrong the fact that it is a historicism but not a Sphyrna does not hold. sent2: there is something such that if it does not sympathize that it is a dekaliter but not medical does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a lobby that it is a historicism and it is not a Sphyrna does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the commissionaire is not a lobby is right the fact that it is a kind of a historicism that is not a Sphyrna is not true. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a lobby then it is a historicism and it is not a Sphyrna. sent6: there is something such that if it does not gripe Danu the fact that it is a kind of a pond that is not a survivalist does not hold. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a lobby that it is a historicism that is a kind of a Sphyrna does not hold. sent8: that the clapboard is anastigmatic but not zoological is not true if it is not a lobby. sent9: if that something is not a kind of a tanga is right then that it is a kind of a podetium and it is not an asymptote is false. sent10: the commissionaire is a kind of a historicism that is not a Sphyrna if it is not a kind of a lobby. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Andrews the fact that it is a sway and it is not a tanga is not true. sent12: that the commissionaire is Bogartian and is not zoological is not true if it is not acetic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not weatherly then the fact that it is a spot and it does not gripe licorice is wrong. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a copepod that it does bargain centimo and it is not a blitz does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it does not bargain ammonia the fact that it is an interplay and it is not a Psocoptera is incorrect. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a pastrami then the fact that it bargains Webster and does not gripe craps is false. sent17: if the commissionaire is not a kind of a Sphyrna that it does seam oocyte and it does not gripe clue is false. sent18: if the commissionaire does not lobby the fact that it is a kind of a historicism and it is a kind of a Sphyrna does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not an interplay the fact that it is a Ursidae and it is not washable is false. sent20: if the commissionaire is not a historicism then that it is unpropitious and it is not a kind of a prolegomenon is wrong. sent21: there is something such that if it is not point-of-sale that it does caricature Uzi and it does not spot is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__