the brawler is a kind of a Aramean.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a terminal and it does not concretize petticoated. sent2: the chrome is pedagogical if it is not a crash and not physical. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a terminal and it does not concretize petticoated does not hold the chrome is secretarial. sent4: the chrome is a kind of a crannied. sent5: if the akaryocyte is not a kind of a Steuben then the chrome is a Bradford and a crannied. sent6: if something is not an aim then it is not physical. sent7: something is not a crash and not physical if it is not an aim. sent8: the chrome is not physical if it does not aim. sent9: if something is both not physical and pedagogical then the quark crashes. sent10: if the akaryocyte is not a kind of a Steuben then the chrome is a crannied. sent11: if something concretizes petticoated the chrome is secretarial. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is a crannied and it is a kind of a Steuben does not hold the nine-spot is not a kind of a Bradford. sent13: there exists something such that that the fact that it is a kind of terminal thing that concretizes petticoated is not wrong is not true. sent14: that the chrome is pedagogical is right if it does not crash and it is physical. sent15: the akaryocyte is a diapir if the quark does crash. sent16: the akaryocyte is not a kind of a Steuben. sent17: if the nine-spot is not a Bradford then the pearl is both not physical and pedagogical. sent18: the fact that the headdress is a kind of a crannied and it is a Steuben is not right. sent19: the fact that the chrome is a diapir is true if that it is a Bradford is true. sent20: the chrome is not a diapir if it is secretarial and it is an aim. sent21: the chrome is not physical. sent22: there exists something such that that it is not non-terminal and does not concretize petticoated is not correct. sent23: if the chrome is an aim or it is not a kind of a Bradford or both the chipboard is not a Bradford. sent24: if the chrome is not non-pedagogical the brawler is a kind of a Aramean.
sent22 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the chrome is secretarial is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chrome is a kind of an aim.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chrome is both secretarial and an aim.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the chrome is not a diapir.; sent5 & sent16 -> int4: the chrome is a Bradford and it is a crannied.; int4 -> int5: the chrome is a kind of a Bradford.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: the chrome is a diapir.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the chrome is not a kind of an aim.; sent7 -> int9: if the chrome is not a kind of an aim then it does not crash and is not physical.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the chrome is both not a crash and not physical.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the chrome is pedagogical.; int11 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the chipboard is not a kind of a Bradford.
$hypothesis$ = the brawler is a kind of a Aramean. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a terminal and it does not concretize petticoated. sent2: the chrome is pedagogical if it is not a crash and not physical. sent3: if there is something such that that it is a terminal and it does not concretize petticoated does not hold the chrome is secretarial. sent4: the chrome is a kind of a crannied. sent5: if the akaryocyte is not a kind of a Steuben then the chrome is a Bradford and a crannied. sent6: if something is not an aim then it is not physical. sent7: something is not a crash and not physical if it is not an aim. sent8: the chrome is not physical if it does not aim. sent9: if something is both not physical and pedagogical then the quark crashes. sent10: if the akaryocyte is not a kind of a Steuben then the chrome is a crannied. sent11: if something concretizes petticoated the chrome is secretarial. sent12: if there is something such that the fact that it is a crannied and it is a kind of a Steuben does not hold the nine-spot is not a kind of a Bradford. sent13: there exists something such that that the fact that it is a kind of terminal thing that concretizes petticoated is not wrong is not true. sent14: that the chrome is pedagogical is right if it does not crash and it is physical. sent15: the akaryocyte is a diapir if the quark does crash. sent16: the akaryocyte is not a kind of a Steuben. sent17: if the nine-spot is not a Bradford then the pearl is both not physical and pedagogical. sent18: the fact that the headdress is a kind of a crannied and it is a Steuben is not right. sent19: the fact that the chrome is a diapir is true if that it is a Bradford is true. sent20: the chrome is not a diapir if it is secretarial and it is an aim. sent21: the chrome is not physical. sent22: there exists something such that that it is not non-terminal and does not concretize petticoated is not correct. sent23: if the chrome is an aim or it is not a kind of a Bradford or both the chipboard is not a Bradford. sent24: if the chrome is not non-pedagogical the brawler is a kind of a Aramean. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the chrome is secretarial is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chrome is a kind of an aim.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the chrome is both secretarial and an aim.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the chrome is not a diapir.; sent5 & sent16 -> int4: the chrome is a Bradford and it is a crannied.; int4 -> int5: the chrome is a kind of a Bradford.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: the chrome is a diapir.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the chrome is not a kind of an aim.; sent7 -> int9: if the chrome is not a kind of an aim then it does not crash and is not physical.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the chrome is both not a crash and not physical.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the chrome is pedagogical.; int11 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__