the fact that there exists something such that if that it does reschedule GHB and it is unpreventable is not right then it is conceptualistic does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a straddle but not a railing it is dehiscent. sent2: the nebule is conceptualistic if it is preventable. sent3: the sodom is preventable if the fact that it is a kind of alienable thing that is a tandoor does not hold. sent4: that there exists something such that if it does not reschedule GHB then it is conceptualistic is correct. sent5: the nebule is a tamarisk if that it is preventable and it is a Kobus does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is voltaic and is not sigmoid hold it is parasitic. sent7: there exists something such that if it does crossbreed legionnaire and it is not Manx it does crossbreed seaborgium. sent8: if that the nebule reschedules GHB and is not preventable does not hold it is conceptualistic. sent9: if that something is a probe but it is not conceptualistic is wrong it is a kind of a adulterant. sent10: the nebule is septic if it does not reschedule GHB. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is voltaic and it is antistrophic is not correct then it does qualify pendant.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
if that the pithead does probe but it is not conceptualistic does not hold it is a adulterant.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it does reschedule GHB and it is unpreventable is not right then it is conceptualistic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a straddle but not a railing it is dehiscent. sent2: the nebule is conceptualistic if it is preventable. sent3: the sodom is preventable if the fact that it is a kind of alienable thing that is a tandoor does not hold. sent4: that there exists something such that if it does not reschedule GHB then it is conceptualistic is correct. sent5: the nebule is a tamarisk if that it is preventable and it is a Kobus does not hold. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is voltaic and is not sigmoid hold it is parasitic. sent7: there exists something such that if it does crossbreed legionnaire and it is not Manx it does crossbreed seaborgium. sent8: if that the nebule reschedules GHB and is not preventable does not hold it is conceptualistic. sent9: if that something is a probe but it is not conceptualistic is wrong it is a kind of a adulterant. sent10: the nebule is septic if it does not reschedule GHB. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is voltaic and it is antistrophic is not correct then it does qualify pendant. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__