that the dinging Kinshasa happens results in that not the dinging Pseudococcidae but the headquartering tact happens.
sent1: the westerly happens and the bioassay occurs. sent2: if the dinging Kinshasa happens the fact that both the dinging Pseudococcidae and the headquartering tact occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the infiltration and the press occurs is right. sent4: the causing and the side-to-sideness happens. sent5: the bioassaying occurs. sent6: the fact that that the westerly occurs and the proposal happens prevents the dinging Kinshasa is not incorrect. sent7: the headquartering Lilliputian brings about that the Monacanness does not occur but the archaeologicalness happens. sent8: the signal and the purpling happens. sent9: that the headquartering tact occurs is brought about by that the proposal does not occur. sent10: not the dinging Pseudococcidae but the headquartering tact happens if the proposal does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dinging Kinshasa occurs.; sent1 -> int1: the westerly happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the proposal happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the westerly and the proposal happens.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the dinging Kinshasa does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the proposal does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: not the dinging Pseudococcidae but the headquartering tact occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the dinging Kinshasa happens results in that not the dinging Pseudococcidae but the headquartering tact happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the westerly happens and the bioassay occurs. sent2: if the dinging Kinshasa happens the fact that both the dinging Pseudococcidae and the headquartering tact occurs is not incorrect. sent3: the fact that the infiltration and the press occurs is right. sent4: the causing and the side-to-sideness happens. sent5: the bioassaying occurs. sent6: the fact that that the westerly occurs and the proposal happens prevents the dinging Kinshasa is not incorrect. sent7: the headquartering Lilliputian brings about that the Monacanness does not occur but the archaeologicalness happens. sent8: the signal and the purpling happens. sent9: that the headquartering tact occurs is brought about by that the proposal does not occur. sent10: not the dinging Pseudococcidae but the headquartering tact happens if the proposal does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dinging Kinshasa occurs.; sent1 -> int1: the westerly happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the proposal happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the westerly and the proposal happens.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the dinging Kinshasa does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the proposal does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: not the dinging Pseudococcidae but the headquartering tact occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__