the trench does not still naphthoquinone.
sent1: if that something is a kind of licit thing that does not reset baggage is wrong it is not a Mirabeau. sent2: if something does not reset baggage then the fact that it is not unwomanly is right. sent3: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a iodopsin and does still edibility. sent4: the baggage is not paschal if there exists something such that the fact that either it is licit or it is a Mirabeau or both is not correct. sent5: the felwort is not paschal. sent6: if the trench is not unwomanly the fact that the felwort is licit or a Mirabeau or both is false. sent7: the tantalum does still naphthoquinone. sent8: there is nothing such that it does not reset obiism and it is a hydrosphere. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reset obiism and is a kind of a hydrosphere is not true the baggage is paschal. sent10: there is something such that it is licit or it is a Mirabeau or both. sent11: something that does not reset obiism is not paschal and is not a kind of a Mirabeau. sent12: if something is both not paschal and not a Mirabeau it is not unwomanly. sent13: the trench does not still naphthoquinone if the felwort does not still naphthoquinone and is licit. sent14: the felwort does not reset baggage. sent15: if something does reset baggage then it stills naphthoquinone.
sent2 -> int1: if the trench does not reset baggage it is not unwomanly.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trench does not reset baggage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the trench is not unwomanly hold.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the felwort is licit or is a Mirabeau or both is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that that it is licit and/or a Mirabeau is not false is false.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the baggage is not paschal.; sent8 -> int6: the fact that the tantalum does not reset obiism but it is a hydrosphere is wrong.; int6 -> int7: that there is something such that that it does not reset obiism and it is a hydrosphere is wrong is true.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the baggage is paschal.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the trench does reset baggage.; sent15 -> int11: if the trench does reset baggage then the fact that it stills naphthoquinone is true.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the trench does not still naphthoquinone.
sent12 -> int12: the baggage is not unwomanly if it is not paschal and it is not a Mirabeau.; sent11 -> int13: if the fact that the baggage does reset obiism is not correct it is not paschal and is not a Mirabeau.;
$hypothesis$ = the trench does not still naphthoquinone. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a kind of licit thing that does not reset baggage is wrong it is not a Mirabeau. sent2: if something does not reset baggage then the fact that it is not unwomanly is right. sent3: there exists nothing such that it is a kind of a iodopsin and does still edibility. sent4: the baggage is not paschal if there exists something such that the fact that either it is licit or it is a Mirabeau or both is not correct. sent5: the felwort is not paschal. sent6: if the trench is not unwomanly the fact that the felwort is licit or a Mirabeau or both is false. sent7: the tantalum does still naphthoquinone. sent8: there is nothing such that it does not reset obiism and it is a hydrosphere. sent9: if there is something such that the fact that it does not reset obiism and is a kind of a hydrosphere is not true the baggage is paschal. sent10: there is something such that it is licit or it is a Mirabeau or both. sent11: something that does not reset obiism is not paschal and is not a kind of a Mirabeau. sent12: if something is both not paschal and not a Mirabeau it is not unwomanly. sent13: the trench does not still naphthoquinone if the felwort does not still naphthoquinone and is licit. sent14: the felwort does not reset baggage. sent15: if something does reset baggage then it stills naphthoquinone. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: if the trench does not reset baggage it is not unwomanly.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trench does not reset baggage.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the trench is not unwomanly hold.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the felwort is licit or is a Mirabeau or both is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that that it is licit and/or a Mirabeau is not false is false.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the baggage is not paschal.; sent8 -> int6: the fact that the tantalum does not reset obiism but it is a hydrosphere is wrong.; int6 -> int7: that there is something such that that it does not reset obiism and it is a hydrosphere is wrong is true.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the baggage is paschal.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the trench does reset baggage.; sent15 -> int11: if the trench does reset baggage then the fact that it stills naphthoquinone is true.; int10 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__