the takeaway does not occur.
sent1: both the presocraticness and the scalloping decagon happens if the thyrotoxicness does not occur. sent2: the thyrotoxicness does not occur. sent3: the bimodalness happens and the anaphrodisiacness happens. sent4: the upping happens. sent5: that the printing happens and the absentness happens prevents the photoelectricness. sent6: the moralization happens. sent7: the defraying Hayek does not occur. sent8: the scalloping daygirl happens. sent9: the southeaster happens. sent10: both the tortiousness and the fomentation happens. sent11: both the defraying Lausanne and the anabolicness occurs. sent12: that the trudge does not occur is caused by that the anabolicness and the defraying thick-knee occurs. sent13: the entrancing Embothrium happens. sent14: the fortune triggers the depolarization. sent15: the fact that the commensal occurs hold. sent16: that the takeaway does not occur is right if not the defraying thick-knee but the presocraticness happens. sent17: the fortune is caused by that the moralization happens. sent18: if the depolarization happens the trudge happens. sent19: the spotting happens. sent20: the entrancing canthus occurs. sent21: the gastrogavage happens if the resurrection happens. sent22: that the bimodalness occurs is prevented by that the scalloping homeobox occurs and the tempering generalist occurs. sent23: the anabolicness does not occur if the defraying thick-knee does not occur and the trudge does not occur. sent24: that the lacing does not occur results in that both the isomerization and the bibliographicness happens. sent25: the straining does not occur but the rockiness happens. sent26: the Spanishness occurs. sent27: if the anabolicness does not occur then the fact that the defraying Lausanne occurs and the carcinomatousness happens is correct.
sent11 -> int1: the anabolicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defraying thick-knee happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the anabolicness happens and the defraying thick-knee occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the trudge does not occur.; sent17 & sent6 -> int4: the fortune occurs.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the depolarization occurs.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the trudge occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the defraying thick-knee does not occur.; sent1 & sent2 -> int9: the presocraticness and the scalloping decagon occurs.; int9 -> int10: the presocraticness occurs.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the defraying thick-knee does not occur and the presocraticness happens.; int11 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the carcinomatousness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the takeaway does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the presocraticness and the scalloping decagon happens if the thyrotoxicness does not occur. sent2: the thyrotoxicness does not occur. sent3: the bimodalness happens and the anaphrodisiacness happens. sent4: the upping happens. sent5: that the printing happens and the absentness happens prevents the photoelectricness. sent6: the moralization happens. sent7: the defraying Hayek does not occur. sent8: the scalloping daygirl happens. sent9: the southeaster happens. sent10: both the tortiousness and the fomentation happens. sent11: both the defraying Lausanne and the anabolicness occurs. sent12: that the trudge does not occur is caused by that the anabolicness and the defraying thick-knee occurs. sent13: the entrancing Embothrium happens. sent14: the fortune triggers the depolarization. sent15: the fact that the commensal occurs hold. sent16: that the takeaway does not occur is right if not the defraying thick-knee but the presocraticness happens. sent17: the fortune is caused by that the moralization happens. sent18: if the depolarization happens the trudge happens. sent19: the spotting happens. sent20: the entrancing canthus occurs. sent21: the gastrogavage happens if the resurrection happens. sent22: that the bimodalness occurs is prevented by that the scalloping homeobox occurs and the tempering generalist occurs. sent23: the anabolicness does not occur if the defraying thick-knee does not occur and the trudge does not occur. sent24: that the lacing does not occur results in that both the isomerization and the bibliographicness happens. sent25: the straining does not occur but the rockiness happens. sent26: the Spanishness occurs. sent27: if the anabolicness does not occur then the fact that the defraying Lausanne occurs and the carcinomatousness happens is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the anabolicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the defraying thick-knee happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the anabolicness happens and the defraying thick-knee occurs.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the trudge does not occur.; sent17 & sent6 -> int4: the fortune occurs.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the depolarization occurs.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the trudge occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the defraying thick-knee does not occur.; sent1 & sent2 -> int9: the presocraticness and the scalloping decagon occurs.; int9 -> int10: the presocraticness occurs.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the defraying thick-knee does not occur and the presocraticness happens.; int11 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__