the confiture is a moneygrubber.
sent1: there is something such that that it is a kind of a sturgeon that is legislative is wrong. sent2: the fact that the confiture is not a kind of a sturgeon but it is a moneygrubber is false. sent3: that the agent is both legislative and a schlockmeister is not true. sent4: there is nothing such that it is both not a sturgeon and legislative. sent5: the fact that the takeout is a sturgeon and legislative is wrong. sent6: if something is not a kind of a thumbstall it is not a kind of a moneygrubber and it is not a Crete.
sent4 -> int1: that the takeout is not a sturgeon but it is legislative does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a sturgeon and it is legislative is incorrect.;
there exists nothing such that it is not a Hilo and is zenithal.
sent6 -> int3: if the filature is not a thumbstall then it is not a moneygrubber and is not a kind of a Crete.;
$hypothesis$ = the confiture is a moneygrubber. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is a kind of a sturgeon that is legislative is wrong. sent2: the fact that the confiture is not a kind of a sturgeon but it is a moneygrubber is false. sent3: that the agent is both legislative and a schlockmeister is not true. sent4: there is nothing such that it is both not a sturgeon and legislative. sent5: the fact that the takeout is a sturgeon and legislative is wrong. sent6: if something is not a kind of a thumbstall it is not a kind of a moneygrubber and it is not a Crete. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the takeout is not a sturgeon but it is legislative does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a sturgeon and it is legislative is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__