the enclosure does not encapsulate Percidae and is not a like.
sent1: the soloist is a Stalinist if that the enclosure does not encapsulate Percidae and it does not like is false. sent2: if the battlement bands the soloist is a kind of a bands. sent3: the battlement is a osteopath or it is a kind of a band or both. sent4: if the ware does not contemplate then that the rook does not update Davenport but it does contemplate is not right. sent5: the soloist does band if that the battlement is a osteopath is true. sent6: the fact that something does not encapsulate Percidae and is not a like is wrong if it is not a band. sent7: if the fact that the soloist does band and is not a Stalinist does not hold the enclosure is not a band. sent8: that the enclosure is not a Stalinist but it is not unlike is not correct. sent9: the icetray is not a kind of an implementation if the soloist is a kind of a Stalinist and it is a band. sent10: the Wight twills Sabah. sent11: if the fact that the enclosure does not update Transcaucasia but it is a like does not hold it is progestational. sent12: that the freewheeler encapsulates bun and is a kind of a Stalinist does not hold. sent13: something is progestational if that it does not encapsulate bun and updates Transcaucasia is not correct. sent14: that the battlement is a osteopath and it updates Davenport is not correct. sent15: The Sabah twills Wight. sent16: the rook is non-Stalinist and non-testimonial. sent17: if something is a kind of an implementation then the fact that it is a band and it is not a Stalinist does not hold. sent18: something is a kind of an implementation if it does not update Davenport and it does not contemplate. sent19: the ware does not contemplate if the icetray is not an implementation. sent20: the enclosure is not a kind of a band if the battlement is like. sent21: the freewheeler is not progestational if that the rook does not update Davenport but it does contemplate is false. sent22: the wallpaperer is not dysphoric and it is not a kind of a croquette. sent23: the soloist is a kind of a band if the Wight band. sent24: the fact that the breastplate updates jabberwocky hold if it is adoptable. sent25: the enclosure does not update Transcaucasia and does not encapsulate Percidae. sent26: that the freewheeler does not encapsulate bun and does update Transcaucasia is incorrect if the Wight does twill Sabah. sent27: if the icetray is a osteopath that the battlement is both not an implementation and progestational does not hold. sent28: either the Wight does twill Sabah or it encapsulates Percidae or both. sent29: the fact that the ware does encapsulate bun and is a osteopath is not correct if that that the freewheeler does not contemplate is right is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the enclosure does not encapsulate Percidae and is not like is incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the soloist is a Stalinist.; sent3 & sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the soloist is a band.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the soloist is a Stalinist and it bands.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the icetray is not an implementation.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the ware does not contemplate.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the rook does not update Davenport and contemplates is not right.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the freewheeler is not progestational.; sent13 -> int8: if that that the freewheeler does not encapsulate bun but it updates Transcaucasia is not true is not false it is progestational.; sent26 & sent10 -> int9: that the freewheeler does not encapsulate bun but it updates Transcaucasia is not right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the freewheeler is progestational.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the enclosure does not encapsulate Percidae and is not a like is not correct.
sent6 -> int12: if the enclosure is not a kind of a band the fact that it does not encapsulate Percidae and it is not like is incorrect.; sent17 -> int13: that the soloist is both a band and not a Stalinist is not correct if it is a kind of an implementation.; sent18 -> int14: the soloist is an implementation if it does not update Davenport and it does not contemplate.;
$hypothesis$ = the enclosure does not encapsulate Percidae and is not a like. ; $context$ = sent1: the soloist is a Stalinist if that the enclosure does not encapsulate Percidae and it does not like is false. sent2: if the battlement bands the soloist is a kind of a bands. sent3: the battlement is a osteopath or it is a kind of a band or both. sent4: if the ware does not contemplate then that the rook does not update Davenport but it does contemplate is not right. sent5: the soloist does band if that the battlement is a osteopath is true. sent6: the fact that something does not encapsulate Percidae and is not a like is wrong if it is not a band. sent7: if the fact that the soloist does band and is not a Stalinist does not hold the enclosure is not a band. sent8: that the enclosure is not a Stalinist but it is not unlike is not correct. sent9: the icetray is not a kind of an implementation if the soloist is a kind of a Stalinist and it is a band. sent10: the Wight twills Sabah. sent11: if the fact that the enclosure does not update Transcaucasia but it is a like does not hold it is progestational. sent12: that the freewheeler encapsulates bun and is a kind of a Stalinist does not hold. sent13: something is progestational if that it does not encapsulate bun and updates Transcaucasia is not correct. sent14: that the battlement is a osteopath and it updates Davenport is not correct. sent15: The Sabah twills Wight. sent16: the rook is non-Stalinist and non-testimonial. sent17: if something is a kind of an implementation then the fact that it is a band and it is not a Stalinist does not hold. sent18: something is a kind of an implementation if it does not update Davenport and it does not contemplate. sent19: the ware does not contemplate if the icetray is not an implementation. sent20: the enclosure is not a kind of a band if the battlement is like. sent21: the freewheeler is not progestational if that the rook does not update Davenport but it does contemplate is false. sent22: the wallpaperer is not dysphoric and it is not a kind of a croquette. sent23: the soloist is a kind of a band if the Wight band. sent24: the fact that the breastplate updates jabberwocky hold if it is adoptable. sent25: the enclosure does not update Transcaucasia and does not encapsulate Percidae. sent26: that the freewheeler does not encapsulate bun and does update Transcaucasia is incorrect if the Wight does twill Sabah. sent27: if the icetray is a osteopath that the battlement is both not an implementation and progestational does not hold. sent28: either the Wight does twill Sabah or it encapsulates Percidae or both. sent29: the fact that the ware does encapsulate bun and is a osteopath is not correct if that that the freewheeler does not contemplate is right is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the enclosure does not encapsulate Percidae and is not like is incorrect.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the soloist is a Stalinist.; sent3 & sent5 & sent2 -> int2: the soloist is a band.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the soloist is a Stalinist and it bands.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the icetray is not an implementation.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the ware does not contemplate.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the rook does not update Davenport and contemplates is not right.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the freewheeler is not progestational.; sent13 -> int8: if that that the freewheeler does not encapsulate bun but it updates Transcaucasia is not true is not false it is progestational.; sent26 & sent10 -> int9: that the freewheeler does not encapsulate bun but it updates Transcaucasia is not right.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the freewheeler is progestational.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__