the chimneysweeper is a origanum.
sent1: something is a kind of an exponential if it bilks picnicker. sent2: there is something such that that it is a clear and it does not extricate magneto does not hold. sent3: if something is sessile then it is a origanum. sent4: the chimneysweeper is a Durer. sent5: there exists something such that that it is accommodative and it is not a lady-of-the-night is not correct. sent6: something reckons but it is not a upholder. sent7: the chimneysweeper is a timetable. sent8: if the chimneysweeper is crucial it is a kind of a Durer. sent9: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Durer and is not sessile is not correct. sent10: there is something such that that the fact that it is a kind of a neoclassicist and it is not usual is not incorrect does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Durer that is sessile is wrong. sent12: the chimneysweeper is a kind of a bachelorhood if it is a kind of a Durer. sent13: the chimneysweeper is a origanum if there is something such that the fact that it is a twentieth and not a origanum does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is sessile and it is not a brachiopod is not correct the chimneysweeper is a brachiopod. sent15: if that the chimneysweeper is a origanum is correct the fact that it is not a kind of a hydrometry is wrong. sent16: there is something such that that it is a Stenotaphrum and it is not a atopy is not true.
sent3 -> int1: if the chimneysweeper is sessile it is a kind of a origanum.;
$hypothesis$ = the chimneysweeper is a origanum. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of an exponential if it bilks picnicker. sent2: there is something such that that it is a clear and it does not extricate magneto does not hold. sent3: if something is sessile then it is a origanum. sent4: the chimneysweeper is a Durer. sent5: there exists something such that that it is accommodative and it is not a lady-of-the-night is not correct. sent6: something reckons but it is not a upholder. sent7: the chimneysweeper is a timetable. sent8: if the chimneysweeper is crucial it is a kind of a Durer. sent9: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Durer and is not sessile is not correct. sent10: there is something such that that the fact that it is a kind of a neoclassicist and it is not usual is not incorrect does not hold. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Durer that is sessile is wrong. sent12: the chimneysweeper is a kind of a bachelorhood if it is a kind of a Durer. sent13: the chimneysweeper is a origanum if there is something such that the fact that it is a twentieth and not a origanum does not hold. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is sessile and it is not a brachiopod is not correct the chimneysweeper is a brachiopod. sent15: if that the chimneysweeper is a origanum is correct the fact that it is not a kind of a hydrometry is wrong. sent16: there is something such that that it is a Stenotaphrum and it is not a atopy is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the chimneysweeper is sessile it is a kind of a origanum.; __UNKNOWN__