the deuterium is not an underwear and is not ethnological.
sent1: that the deuterium is bromic and does not mush deuterium is wrong. sent2: that the deuterium is a kind of non-dominical thing that does not liquefy bioclimatology is not true. sent3: if something is ethnological then the fact that it is not dominical and does not liquefy Mellon is not correct. sent4: if that the desideratum is both not downtown and not myalgic is false it does liquefy camel. sent5: the bratwurst is a kind of an underwear and it does liquefy camel if it does not offer. sent6: if something liquefies camel then it is not an underwear and not ethnological. sent7: if something is not a kind of a generalissimo or it does not augur or both then it does not offer.
sent6 -> int1: the deuterium is not an underwear and not ethnological if it does liquefy camel.;
the fact that the deuterium is not a kind of an underwear and is not ethnological is not right.
sent7 -> int2: that the bratwurst is not a kind of an offering is not wrong if either it is not a generalissimo or it is not an augur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the deuterium is not an underwear and is not ethnological. ; $context$ = sent1: that the deuterium is bromic and does not mush deuterium is wrong. sent2: that the deuterium is a kind of non-dominical thing that does not liquefy bioclimatology is not true. sent3: if something is ethnological then the fact that it is not dominical and does not liquefy Mellon is not correct. sent4: if that the desideratum is both not downtown and not myalgic is false it does liquefy camel. sent5: the bratwurst is a kind of an underwear and it does liquefy camel if it does not offer. sent6: if something liquefies camel then it is not an underwear and not ethnological. sent7: if something is not a kind of a generalissimo or it does not augur or both then it does not offer. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the deuterium is not an underwear and not ethnological if it does liquefy camel.; __UNKNOWN__