that the Snow is both not a sailing and pleasant does not hold.
sent1: the oilman is not a dacryon or it is archducal or both. sent2: the amaretto is not citrous but it crucifies. sent3: the amaretto does not crucify and/or is a kind of a juvenile if the Snow is not a kind of a mambo. sent4: the amaretto does not rusticate. sent5: if that something is a kind of a moonstone that is indehiscent is wrong then it does not tusk rho. sent6: the amaretto is not a mambo if the fact that the brace is not archducal but a mambo is wrong. sent7: the slider sails. sent8: either the Snow is not a mambo or it does crucify or both. sent9: either the Snow is not pleasant or it crucifies or both. sent10: the Snow is pleasant. sent11: the Snow crucifies if the fact that it is a sailing is true. sent12: if the Snow does tusk rho then it is not a kind of a sailing. sent13: the amaretto is not a mambo and crucifies. sent14: that the Snow either is not unreceptive or does cater or both is not correct. sent15: the Pretender does not persuade if the charlotte tusks zeppelin or it is not heliacal or both. sent16: that the amaretto does not crucify and/or it is a juvenile is not right. sent17: the amaretto is not a shamelessness. sent18: the fact that something is both a moonstone and indehiscent is not right if it does not persuade. sent19: either everything tusks zeppelin or it is not heliacal or both. sent20: if the Snow is a mambo then the fact that it does tusk rho is not incorrect. sent21: the hank is a mambo. sent22: if something that does not tusk rho does not mambo the fact that it is impenetrable is not incorrect. sent23: the resorcinol does not crucify and is a consul.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Snow is not a mambo.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: either the amaretto does not crucify or it is a juvenile or both.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Snow does mambo.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the Snow does tusk rho.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the Snow is not a kind of a sailing.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
that the Snow is not a sailing but pleasant is false.
sent5 -> int6: the Pretender does not tusk rho if the fact that it is a moonstone and it is indehiscent is false.; sent18 -> int7: if that the Pretender does not persuade hold then the fact that it is a moonstone and is indehiscent is incorrect.; sent19 -> int8: either the charlotte tusks zeppelin or it is not heliacal or both.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the Pretender does not persuade is not wrong.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the Pretender is a moonstone and it is indehiscent is false.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Pretender does not tusk rho.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it does not tusk rho.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Snow is both not a sailing and pleasant does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the oilman is not a dacryon or it is archducal or both. sent2: the amaretto is not citrous but it crucifies. sent3: the amaretto does not crucify and/or is a kind of a juvenile if the Snow is not a kind of a mambo. sent4: the amaretto does not rusticate. sent5: if that something is a kind of a moonstone that is indehiscent is wrong then it does not tusk rho. sent6: the amaretto is not a mambo if the fact that the brace is not archducal but a mambo is wrong. sent7: the slider sails. sent8: either the Snow is not a mambo or it does crucify or both. sent9: either the Snow is not pleasant or it crucifies or both. sent10: the Snow is pleasant. sent11: the Snow crucifies if the fact that it is a sailing is true. sent12: if the Snow does tusk rho then it is not a kind of a sailing. sent13: the amaretto is not a mambo and crucifies. sent14: that the Snow either is not unreceptive or does cater or both is not correct. sent15: the Pretender does not persuade if the charlotte tusks zeppelin or it is not heliacal or both. sent16: that the amaretto does not crucify and/or it is a juvenile is not right. sent17: the amaretto is not a shamelessness. sent18: the fact that something is both a moonstone and indehiscent is not right if it does not persuade. sent19: either everything tusks zeppelin or it is not heliacal or both. sent20: if the Snow is a mambo then the fact that it does tusk rho is not incorrect. sent21: the hank is a mambo. sent22: if something that does not tusk rho does not mambo the fact that it is impenetrable is not incorrect. sent23: the resorcinol does not crucify and is a consul. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Snow is not a mambo.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: either the amaretto does not crucify or it is a juvenile or both.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Snow does mambo.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the Snow does tusk rho.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the Snow is not a kind of a sailing.; int5 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__