the dimpling occurs.
sent1: the devastation happens. sent2: the non-low-tensionness triggers that the bluster does not occur and the queening liqueur does not occur. sent3: if the scraping occurs that the catholicness does not occur and the bardolatry happens is false. sent4: the dimple and the devastation occurs if the fact that the boasting does not occur hold. sent5: both the lend-lease and the queening unpermissiveness happens. sent6: that both the non-low-tensionness and the catholicness happens is caused by the bardolatry. sent7: the Union and the cautery happens. sent8: that the dimpling does not occur is prevented by that the low-tensionness does not occur and the queening liqueur does not occur. sent9: if that the bluster occurs hold then the dimple does not occur. sent10: the foundation does not occur if the fact that the scraping does not occur but the cautery happens does not hold. sent11: the devastation happens and the boast happens. sent12: that the deposit happens and the foundation does not occur is not right. sent13: that the boast does not occur results in that the beautifulness occurs and the devastation happens. sent14: that both the bardolatry and the deposit occurs is triggered by that the foundation does not occur. sent15: if the fact that both the non-catholicness and the bardolatry occurs is false then the queening liqueur does not occur. sent16: that the resultant does not occur is brought about by that the epiphany happens and/or the indivisibleness happens. sent17: the blustering or that the boasting happens or both prevents the dimple.
sent11 -> int1: the boast occurs.; int1 -> int2: the bluster and/or the boasting happens.; sent17 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the dimpling happens.
$hypothesis$ = the dimpling occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the devastation happens. sent2: the non-low-tensionness triggers that the bluster does not occur and the queening liqueur does not occur. sent3: if the scraping occurs that the catholicness does not occur and the bardolatry happens is false. sent4: the dimple and the devastation occurs if the fact that the boasting does not occur hold. sent5: both the lend-lease and the queening unpermissiveness happens. sent6: that both the non-low-tensionness and the catholicness happens is caused by the bardolatry. sent7: the Union and the cautery happens. sent8: that the dimpling does not occur is prevented by that the low-tensionness does not occur and the queening liqueur does not occur. sent9: if that the bluster occurs hold then the dimple does not occur. sent10: the foundation does not occur if the fact that the scraping does not occur but the cautery happens does not hold. sent11: the devastation happens and the boast happens. sent12: that the deposit happens and the foundation does not occur is not right. sent13: that the boast does not occur results in that the beautifulness occurs and the devastation happens. sent14: that both the bardolatry and the deposit occurs is triggered by that the foundation does not occur. sent15: if the fact that both the non-catholicness and the bardolatry occurs is false then the queening liqueur does not occur. sent16: that the resultant does not occur is brought about by that the epiphany happens and/or the indivisibleness happens. sent17: the blustering or that the boasting happens or both prevents the dimple. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the boast occurs.; int1 -> int2: the bluster and/or the boasting happens.; sent17 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__