the Jewess is catoptric.
sent1: something does shelter pung if it is not a kind of a steep. sent2: that that the Jewess distinguishes findings and it is macromolecular is true is incorrect if there is something such that it is not a handkerchief. sent3: the fact that the Jewess is a smell is not wrong. sent4: if something is not macromolecular that it is a handkerchief and does not distinguish findings is incorrect. sent5: if something is macromolecular then it is a handkerchief. sent6: the varietal does not use and is low-level if it is autumnal. sent7: if something is not a use it does distinguish plunk and it is macromolecular. sent8: if the Jewess is not macromolecular then that it does not distinguish plunk is correct. sent9: the varietal is autumnal if there exists something such that it is a brambling and it does not hoard Hesperus. sent10: the standee distinguishes plunk. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a handkerchief. sent12: something is not a kind of a handkerchief. sent13: the prospect is not a use if that the turnery is a use and/or it is not low-level does not hold. sent14: something does not distinguish plunk if the fact that it distinguishes findings and is not non-macromolecular is incorrect. sent15: that something does not distinguish weightlifter is not false. sent16: the Jewess is a handkerchief. sent17: the varietal is not macromolecular if the fact that the prospect is a kind of macromolecular thing that does distinguish plunk is not right. sent18: if something is not macromolecular that it does not distinguish plunk hold. sent19: the turnery is not non-autumnal. sent20: something is a brambling and does not hoard Hesperus. sent21: that the Jewess is macromolecular and it is a Hazardia does not hold. sent22: the fact that something does use and/or it is not low-level is not correct if it is autumnal.
sent12 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the Jewess does distinguish findings and it is macromolecular does not hold.; sent14 -> int2: if that the Jewess distinguishes findings and is macromolecular does not hold it does not distinguish plunk.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Jewess does not distinguish plunk is not wrong.;
the Jewess is non-catoptric.
sent4 -> int4: the fact that the varietal is a handkerchief but it does not distinguish findings is not true if it is not macromolecular.; sent22 -> int5: the fact that the turnery uses and/or is not low-level does not hold if it is autumnal.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the fact that the turnery is a use or it is not low-level or both does not hold.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: that the prospect is not a use is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Jewess is catoptric. ; $context$ = sent1: something does shelter pung if it is not a kind of a steep. sent2: that that the Jewess distinguishes findings and it is macromolecular is true is incorrect if there is something such that it is not a handkerchief. sent3: the fact that the Jewess is a smell is not wrong. sent4: if something is not macromolecular that it is a handkerchief and does not distinguish findings is incorrect. sent5: if something is macromolecular then it is a handkerchief. sent6: the varietal does not use and is low-level if it is autumnal. sent7: if something is not a use it does distinguish plunk and it is macromolecular. sent8: if the Jewess is not macromolecular then that it does not distinguish plunk is correct. sent9: the varietal is autumnal if there exists something such that it is a brambling and it does not hoard Hesperus. sent10: the standee distinguishes plunk. sent11: there exists something such that it is a kind of a handkerchief. sent12: something is not a kind of a handkerchief. sent13: the prospect is not a use if that the turnery is a use and/or it is not low-level does not hold. sent14: something does not distinguish plunk if the fact that it distinguishes findings and is not non-macromolecular is incorrect. sent15: that something does not distinguish weightlifter is not false. sent16: the Jewess is a handkerchief. sent17: the varietal is not macromolecular if the fact that the prospect is a kind of macromolecular thing that does distinguish plunk is not right. sent18: if something is not macromolecular that it does not distinguish plunk hold. sent19: the turnery is not non-autumnal. sent20: something is a brambling and does not hoard Hesperus. sent21: that the Jewess is macromolecular and it is a Hazardia does not hold. sent22: the fact that something does use and/or it is not low-level is not correct if it is autumnal. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the Jewess does distinguish findings and it is macromolecular does not hold.; sent14 -> int2: if that the Jewess distinguishes findings and is macromolecular does not hold it does not distinguish plunk.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the Jewess does not distinguish plunk is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__