that there is something such that if it does not madden bonefish that it does glamorize weber and it is a surrender is false is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a Hupa that it is both a chromatism and abundant is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not concur that it spies and it does glamorize lyre is not correct. sent3: if the clomipramine does not tweeze then that it is a kind of a pregnanediol and it is a kind of a surrender does not hold. sent4: if the gnathostome is not a kind of a cautery that it is a surrender and maddens affinity is not right. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not Demosthenic then that it is literal and it does glamorize victimization is not correct. sent6: that something is attitudinal and it is penetrable is wrong if it is not a kind of a lychgate. sent7: the fact that the clomipramine glamorizes weber and does surrender is wrong if it maddens bonefish. sent8: the fact that that the clomipramine is the Buccinidae and does madden bonefish is wrong if the clomipramine does not glamorize cefoperazone hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not madden bonefish then it glamorizes weber and it does surrender. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a stover then the fact that it is a consistency and it is a wollastonite is not correct. sent11: there is something such that if it is not menstrual that it is both not non-ventricular and Demosthenic is wrong. sent12: the fact that the clomipramine does glamorize weber and is a surrender is false if it does not madden bonefish. sent13: if the webcam does not prawn the fact that it is a kind of rehabilitative a gunnysack is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it does madden bonefish the fact that it glamorizes weber and does surrender is not correct. sent15: the fact that the clomipramine is a kind of a Keble that concretizes lowerclassman does not hold if it does not glamorize weber. sent16: if the clomipramine does not madden bonefish then it glamorizes weber and is a surrender.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a lychgate the fact that it is attitudinal but not impenetrable is not right.
sent6 -> int1: if the soup is not a lychgate the fact that it is both not non-attitudinal and not impenetrable is not correct.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not madden bonefish that it does glamorize weber and it is a surrender is false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a Hupa that it is both a chromatism and abundant is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not concur that it spies and it does glamorize lyre is not correct. sent3: if the clomipramine does not tweeze then that it is a kind of a pregnanediol and it is a kind of a surrender does not hold. sent4: if the gnathostome is not a kind of a cautery that it is a surrender and maddens affinity is not right. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not Demosthenic then that it is literal and it does glamorize victimization is not correct. sent6: that something is attitudinal and it is penetrable is wrong if it is not a kind of a lychgate. sent7: the fact that the clomipramine glamorizes weber and does surrender is wrong if it maddens bonefish. sent8: the fact that that the clomipramine is the Buccinidae and does madden bonefish is wrong if the clomipramine does not glamorize cefoperazone hold. sent9: there exists something such that if it does not madden bonefish then it glamorizes weber and it does surrender. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a stover then the fact that it is a consistency and it is a wollastonite is not correct. sent11: there is something such that if it is not menstrual that it is both not non-ventricular and Demosthenic is wrong. sent12: the fact that the clomipramine does glamorize weber and is a surrender is false if it does not madden bonefish. sent13: if the webcam does not prawn the fact that it is a kind of rehabilitative a gunnysack is not right. sent14: there exists something such that if it does madden bonefish the fact that it glamorizes weber and does surrender is not correct. sent15: the fact that the clomipramine is a kind of a Keble that concretizes lowerclassman does not hold if it does not glamorize weber. sent16: if the clomipramine does not madden bonefish then it glamorizes weber and is a surrender. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__