the vaquero does not ablate.
sent1: the fact that the address is a kind of aciculate thing that sputters Hammerstein is wrong. sent2: if the silkscreen is a groan the streamliner is a Ricinus. sent3: if the epilation is not aciculate the fact that the address is aciculate thing that sputters Hammerstein is not right. sent4: the myrobalan does not clank might-have-been. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is a Ricinus and does not convoy Dactyloscopidae is incorrect then the epilation does sputter Hammerstein. sent6: that something does not ablate and it is not aciculate is not incorrect if it does not groan. sent7: the silkscreen is a kind of a groan if that the address is not aciculate but it sputters Hammerstein is not right. sent8: if the streamliner is a Ricinus then the vaquero does ablate. sent9: the fact that the address is a kind of non-aciculate thing that does sputter Hammerstein is wrong if the epilation is aciculate. sent10: there exists nothing that is a Ricinus that does not convoy Dactyloscopidae. sent11: the epilation is not aciculate if a non-geomorphologic thing does not clank might-have-been. sent12: the myrobalan is not geomorphologic and it does not clank might-have-been. sent13: there exists something such that it does not clank might-have-been. sent14: something is geomorphologic and does not clank might-have-been. sent15: if something that is non-geomorphologic clanks might-have-been the epilation is not aciculate.
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not geomorphologic and it does not clank might-have-been.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the epilation is not aciculate.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: that the address is not aciculate but it sputters Hammerstein is not true.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the silkscreen is a groan is true.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the streamliner is a Ricinus.; sent8 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the vaquero does not ablate.
sent6 -> int6: the vaquero does not ablate and is not aciculate if it is not a groan.; sent10 -> int7: the fact that the address is a Ricinus but it does not convoy Dactyloscopidae is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that that it is a Ricinus that does not convoy Dactyloscopidae is not correct.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the epilation does sputter Hammerstein.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it does sputter Hammerstein.;
$hypothesis$ = the vaquero does not ablate. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the address is a kind of aciculate thing that sputters Hammerstein is wrong. sent2: if the silkscreen is a groan the streamliner is a Ricinus. sent3: if the epilation is not aciculate the fact that the address is aciculate thing that sputters Hammerstein is not right. sent4: the myrobalan does not clank might-have-been. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is a Ricinus and does not convoy Dactyloscopidae is incorrect then the epilation does sputter Hammerstein. sent6: that something does not ablate and it is not aciculate is not incorrect if it does not groan. sent7: the silkscreen is a kind of a groan if that the address is not aciculate but it sputters Hammerstein is not right. sent8: if the streamliner is a Ricinus then the vaquero does ablate. sent9: the fact that the address is a kind of non-aciculate thing that does sputter Hammerstein is wrong if the epilation is aciculate. sent10: there exists nothing that is a Ricinus that does not convoy Dactyloscopidae. sent11: the epilation is not aciculate if a non-geomorphologic thing does not clank might-have-been. sent12: the myrobalan is not geomorphologic and it does not clank might-have-been. sent13: there exists something such that it does not clank might-have-been. sent14: something is geomorphologic and does not clank might-have-been. sent15: if something that is non-geomorphologic clanks might-have-been the epilation is not aciculate. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not geomorphologic and it does not clank might-have-been.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the epilation is not aciculate.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: that the address is not aciculate but it sputters Hammerstein is not true.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the silkscreen is a groan is true.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the streamliner is a Ricinus.; sent8 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__