if the petitioner is a discourse then the fact that that the halothane is a worktable and is not an absorbent is not wrong is false.
sent1: the fact that the halothane does not mangle thallium but it is a sign is not true if the petitioner is a fatalist. sent2: something is a worktable and not absorbent if it is not Bosnian. sent3: that the halothane is a worktable and it is absorbent is not correct if it is not Bosnian. sent4: the halothane is a worktable but it is not absorbent. sent5: if the fact that the halothane is not Bosnian or it does not sign or both is not incorrect then the fact that it does not mangle thallium is true. sent6: something is not Bosnian if that it does not mangle thallium and it does sign does not hold. sent7: if something is not a sign it is not Bosnian. sent8: the fact that something is both a worktable and not an absorbent does not hold if it is not Bosnian. sent9: the fact that the halothane is both a worktable and an absorbent is incorrect. sent10: the halothane is a worktable but it is not absorbent if the petitioner is a discourse. sent11: if something is not Bosnian then that it is a kind of a worktable and it is an absorbent is incorrect. sent12: that something is an absorbent that does not impale is not correct if it is a discourse. sent13: if that something is not Indonesian but it does touch is wrong then that it is not a caracal hold. sent14: if the petitioner is not a worktable it is not a sign or it is not Bosnian or both. sent15: the petitioner is a fatalist if it is a kind of a discourse. sent16: that the petitioner is a kind of fatalist thing that is not Bosnian is not correct if the halothane is an absorbent. sent17: if something either does not sign or is not Bosnian or both then it is not a discourse. sent18: if the halothane is not a kind of a sign then that it is not Bosnian is correct. sent19: if that the petitioner is a discourse is not incorrect that the halothane is a worktable and it is an absorbent is wrong. sent20: the halothane is a worktable that is not an absorbent if it is not Bosnian. sent21: that the fact that the petitioner is a kind of a worktable but it is not a kind of a discourse is correct is not right if the halothane is a kind of an absorbent.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petitioner is a kind of a discourse.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the petitioner is a fatalist.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the halothane does not mangle thallium but it signs does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if that the halothane does not mangle thallium and is a sign does not hold it is not Bosnian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the halothane is not Bosnian.; sent8 -> int5: if the halothane is not Bosnian the fact that it is a worktable that is not absorbent is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the halothane is a worktable and not an absorbent is incorrect.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the halothane is an absorbent but it does not impale is not correct.
sent12 -> int7: the fact that the halothane is an absorbent and does not impale is wrong if it is a discourse.;
$hypothesis$ = if the petitioner is a discourse then the fact that that the halothane is a worktable and is not an absorbent is not wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the halothane does not mangle thallium but it is a sign is not true if the petitioner is a fatalist. sent2: something is a worktable and not absorbent if it is not Bosnian. sent3: that the halothane is a worktable and it is absorbent is not correct if it is not Bosnian. sent4: the halothane is a worktable but it is not absorbent. sent5: if the fact that the halothane is not Bosnian or it does not sign or both is not incorrect then the fact that it does not mangle thallium is true. sent6: something is not Bosnian if that it does not mangle thallium and it does sign does not hold. sent7: if something is not a sign it is not Bosnian. sent8: the fact that something is both a worktable and not an absorbent does not hold if it is not Bosnian. sent9: the fact that the halothane is both a worktable and an absorbent is incorrect. sent10: the halothane is a worktable but it is not absorbent if the petitioner is a discourse. sent11: if something is not Bosnian then that it is a kind of a worktable and it is an absorbent is incorrect. sent12: that something is an absorbent that does not impale is not correct if it is a discourse. sent13: if that something is not Indonesian but it does touch is wrong then that it is not a caracal hold. sent14: if the petitioner is not a worktable it is not a sign or it is not Bosnian or both. sent15: the petitioner is a fatalist if it is a kind of a discourse. sent16: that the petitioner is a kind of fatalist thing that is not Bosnian is not correct if the halothane is an absorbent. sent17: if something either does not sign or is not Bosnian or both then it is not a discourse. sent18: if the halothane is not a kind of a sign then that it is not Bosnian is correct. sent19: if that the petitioner is a discourse is not incorrect that the halothane is a worktable and it is an absorbent is wrong. sent20: the halothane is a worktable that is not an absorbent if it is not Bosnian. sent21: that the fact that the petitioner is a kind of a worktable but it is not a kind of a discourse is correct is not right if the halothane is a kind of an absorbent. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the petitioner is a kind of a discourse.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the petitioner is a fatalist.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the halothane does not mangle thallium but it signs does not hold.; sent6 -> int3: if that the halothane does not mangle thallium and is a sign does not hold it is not Bosnian.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the halothane is not Bosnian.; sent8 -> int5: if the halothane is not Bosnian the fact that it is a worktable that is not absorbent is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the halothane is a worktable and not an absorbent is incorrect.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__