that there exists something such that if it is not a loaf or it does quench cartload or both it is intralobular is false.
sent1: if the petiolule is not a loaf or it quenches cartload or both that it is intralobular is true. sent2: something does bond if either it is not a kind of a loaf or it does stampede anaglyph or both. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not glabellar and/or it is a lengthiness it is a kind of a redhorse. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not creosote and/or it is a contestant it stampedes milligram. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a luminism and/or it is an ethylene then the fact that it is inanimate is true. sent6: there is something such that if it is a loaf and/or does quench cartload then it is intralobular. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not inoperative or it is nonfunctional or both it does auspicate. sent8: that there exists something such that if it does quench cartload then it is intralobular is not wrong. sent9: the petiolule is not non-intralobular if it is not a kind of a loaf. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a loaf it is intralobular.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
if the arcade is not a kind of a loaf and/or does stampede anaglyph then it is a bonding.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a loaf or it does quench cartload or both it is intralobular is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the petiolule is not a loaf or it quenches cartload or both that it is intralobular is true. sent2: something does bond if either it is not a kind of a loaf or it does stampede anaglyph or both. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not glabellar and/or it is a lengthiness it is a kind of a redhorse. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not creosote and/or it is a contestant it stampedes milligram. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a luminism and/or it is an ethylene then the fact that it is inanimate is true. sent6: there is something such that if it is a loaf and/or does quench cartload then it is intralobular. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not inoperative or it is nonfunctional or both it does auspicate. sent8: that there exists something such that if it does quench cartload then it is intralobular is not wrong. sent9: the petiolule is not non-intralobular if it is not a kind of a loaf. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a loaf it is intralobular. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__