that the pantothen is not a theme but it is a pyrochemistry is wrong if the timothy is breathless.
sent1: the pantothen damps subdominant if the timothy is breathless. sent2: the pantothen is not a kind of a theme but it is a pyrochemistry if the fact that the timothy is breathless is right. sent3: if the pantothen damps subdominant then the fact that it themes and it is a pyrochemistry is wrong. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a theme but it is a kind of a pyrochemistry is false if it damps subdominant. sent5: if that the pantothen is breathless is correct that that it does not damp subdominant and it themes hold is wrong. sent6: if something does damp subdominant then that it is a theme and it is a kind of a pyrochemistry is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the timothy is not breathing.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pantothen damps subdominant.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the pantothen is not a theme but a pyrochemistry is incorrect if it does damp subdominant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the pantothen is not a theme but it is a pyrochemistry is not correct.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the pantothen is not a theme but it is a pyrochemistry is wrong if the timothy is breathless. ; $context$ = sent1: the pantothen damps subdominant if the timothy is breathless. sent2: the pantothen is not a kind of a theme but it is a pyrochemistry if the fact that the timothy is breathless is right. sent3: if the pantothen damps subdominant then the fact that it themes and it is a pyrochemistry is wrong. sent4: the fact that something is not a kind of a theme but it is a kind of a pyrochemistry is false if it damps subdominant. sent5: if that the pantothen is breathless is correct that that it does not damp subdominant and it themes hold is wrong. sent6: if something does damp subdominant then that it is a theme and it is a kind of a pyrochemistry is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the timothy is not breathing.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pantothen damps subdominant.; sent4 -> int2: the fact that the pantothen is not a theme but a pyrochemistry is incorrect if it does damp subdominant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the pantothen is not a theme but it is a pyrochemistry is not correct.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__