the low is not a kind of a Atropidae.
sent1: the fact that something is neoclassicist and/or does crumble invite is incorrect if it is not a adeptness. sent2: if that the collodion is Tantric thing that is not a kind of a welcher is wrong then it is a welcher. sent3: the fact that the fact that the napalm is a kind of non-nonrepetitive thing that does not tweeze waggery is not incorrect is not true if it is a kind of a adeptness. sent4: that the collodion is Tantric but not a welcher is not true. sent5: the collodion is not a welcher if there exists something such that that it is a neoclassicist or crumbles invite or both is not right.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the napalm is neoclassicist or does crumble invite or both is not true if it is not a adeptness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the napalm is not a kind of a adeptness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the napalm either is a neoclassicist or does crumble invite or both does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is a neoclassicist and/or it does crumble invite is false.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the collodion is not a welcher.; sent2 & sent4 -> int5: the collodion is a kind of a welcher.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the napalm is a kind of a adeptness.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: that the napalm is a kind of repetitive thing that does not tweeze waggery is not right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is not nonrepetitive and does not tweeze waggery is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the low is not a kind of a Atropidae. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is neoclassicist and/or does crumble invite is incorrect if it is not a adeptness. sent2: if that the collodion is Tantric thing that is not a kind of a welcher is wrong then it is a welcher. sent3: the fact that the fact that the napalm is a kind of non-nonrepetitive thing that does not tweeze waggery is not incorrect is not true if it is a kind of a adeptness. sent4: that the collodion is Tantric but not a welcher is not true. sent5: the collodion is not a welcher if there exists something such that that it is a neoclassicist or crumbles invite or both is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the napalm is neoclassicist or does crumble invite or both is not true if it is not a adeptness.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the napalm is not a kind of a adeptness.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the napalm either is a neoclassicist or does crumble invite or both does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is a neoclassicist and/or it does crumble invite is false.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the collodion is not a welcher.; sent2 & sent4 -> int5: the collodion is a kind of a welcher.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the napalm is a kind of a adeptness.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: that the napalm is a kind of repetitive thing that does not tweeze waggery is not right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is not nonrepetitive and does not tweeze waggery is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__