that the motel is a pulp but it does not shoot Chionanthus is not correct.
sent1: if the fact that the motel is an agitator and it is literate is not correct it does not shoot Chionanthus. sent2: that the motel does not shoot Chionanthus hold if it is not a literate. sent3: the fact that the diode is not a literate is not incorrect. sent4: the motel is a kind of a Asian. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a rabbinate and is not a pulp is not true the motel is a pulp. sent6: if something is a pulp that it is maturational is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does pulp but it does not shoot Chionanthus is false if it is not a rabbinate. sent8: if something is not a Acanthuridae it is not teratogenic and is not sternutatory. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a rabbinate and it does not pulp is false. sent10: something is maturational if it does shoot Chionanthus. sent11: if the goalkeeper is not teratogenic and it is not sternutatory then the malingerer shoots Haggai. sent12: something that is a kind of a ethosuximide and does not consummate inflammation is not a kind of a rabbinate. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a rabbinate the motel either does shoot Chionanthus or is a pulp or both. sent14: the fact that the salmi is coccal is not incorrect. sent15: something is a rabbinate but it does not pulp. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a rabbinate and is a pulp does not hold. sent17: the borsch does humanize or shoots sucker or both if there is something such that it does shoots sucker. sent18: there is something such that it does shoot sucker. sent19: the goalkeeper does not shoot Haggai if there exists something such that it is teratogenic. sent20: something is sternutatory and/or it is teratogenic. sent21: the fact that the motel is an agitator and it is a literate does not hold. sent22: something is not a rabbinate if it is not a kind of a ethosuximide and it does not consummate inflammation. sent23: the borsch is teratogenic if there is something such that either it is sternutatory or it is teratogenic or both. sent24: if there exists something such that it is not a rabbinate the motel pulps.
sent1 & sent21 -> int1: that the motel does not shoot Chionanthus is right.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the motel is a pulp.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the motel is maturational.
sent22 -> int3: if the malingerer is not a kind of a ethosuximide and it does not consummate inflammation it is not a kind of a rabbinate.; sent20 & sent23 -> int4: the borsch is teratogenic.; int4 -> int5: there are teratogenic things.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the goalkeeper does not shoot Haggai.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does not shoot Haggai.; sent10 -> int8: the motel is maturational if it does shoot Chionanthus.; sent6 -> int9: the motel is maturational if it is a kind of a pulp.;
$hypothesis$ = that the motel is a pulp but it does not shoot Chionanthus is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the motel is an agitator and it is literate is not correct it does not shoot Chionanthus. sent2: that the motel does not shoot Chionanthus hold if it is not a literate. sent3: the fact that the diode is not a literate is not incorrect. sent4: the motel is a kind of a Asian. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a rabbinate and is not a pulp is not true the motel is a pulp. sent6: if something is a pulp that it is maturational is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does pulp but it does not shoot Chionanthus is false if it is not a rabbinate. sent8: if something is not a Acanthuridae it is not teratogenic and is not sternutatory. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is a rabbinate and it does not pulp is false. sent10: something is maturational if it does shoot Chionanthus. sent11: if the goalkeeper is not teratogenic and it is not sternutatory then the malingerer shoots Haggai. sent12: something that is a kind of a ethosuximide and does not consummate inflammation is not a kind of a rabbinate. sent13: if there exists something such that it is not a rabbinate the motel either does shoot Chionanthus or is a pulp or both. sent14: the fact that the salmi is coccal is not incorrect. sent15: something is a rabbinate but it does not pulp. sent16: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a rabbinate and is a pulp does not hold. sent17: the borsch does humanize or shoots sucker or both if there is something such that it does shoots sucker. sent18: there is something such that it does shoot sucker. sent19: the goalkeeper does not shoot Haggai if there exists something such that it is teratogenic. sent20: something is sternutatory and/or it is teratogenic. sent21: the fact that the motel is an agitator and it is a literate does not hold. sent22: something is not a rabbinate if it is not a kind of a ethosuximide and it does not consummate inflammation. sent23: the borsch is teratogenic if there is something such that either it is sternutatory or it is teratogenic or both. sent24: if there exists something such that it is not a rabbinate the motel pulps. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent21 -> int1: that the motel does not shoot Chionanthus is right.; sent9 & sent5 -> int2: the motel is a pulp.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__