there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kilderkin is correct it does not excrete cutback.
sent1: that the coucal excretes cutback is correct if it is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and does not sample Incarnation. sent2: something that does not sample coucal excretes cutback and is a kind of a intentionality. sent3: if there is something such that it is not a kilderkin and does not transubstantiate the coucal is not an intangible. sent4: if something is not a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation it does excrete cutback. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kilderkin then it does excrete cutback. sent6: something that is a Calycophyllum and does not sample Incarnation does not excrete cutback. sent7: if the coucal is not a kilderkin it does not transubstantiate. sent8: something is non-bronchial thing that does not sample prosiness if it is not a butterflyfish. sent9: if the coucal is not a kilderkin it does excrete cutback. sent10: something does sample Incarnation if it is a Calycophyllum. sent11: the coucal is not a Calycophyllum. sent12: the isobutylene does not sample Ovid if it does not transubstantiate and it is like. sent13: the aeciospore does not sample coucal. sent14: if something that does excrete cutback is a kind of a intentionality then the fact that the pound is a Calycophyllum hold. sent15: something is not a Calycophyllum if it does not transubstantiate. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kilderkin it does not excrete cutback. sent17: if the coucal is a kind of a kilderkin it does not excrete cutback. sent18: there is something such that if it does not excrete kicker it is not a mince. sent19: something is not a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation if that it does not transubstantiate is right. sent20: if the coucal is a kind of a Calycophyllum that does not sample Incarnation then it does not excrete cutback. sent21: if something is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation it does not excrete cutback.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coucal is not a kilderkin.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the coucal does not transubstantiate.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the coucal does not transubstantiate is not incorrect then it is not a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the coucal is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and does not sample Incarnation.; sent21 -> int4: the coucal does not excrete cutback if it is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the coucal does not excrete cutback.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the coucal is not a kilderkin it does not excrete cutback.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the coucal is not a kind of an intangible.
sent10 -> int7: if the pound is a Calycophyllum then it samples Incarnation.; sent2 -> int8: if the aeciospore does not sample coucal it does excrete cutback and it is a intentionality.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the aeciospore excretes cutback and is a intentionality.; int9 -> int10: something excretes cutback and it is a intentionality.; int10 & sent14 -> int11: the pound is a Calycophyllum.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the pound samples Incarnation.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a kilderkin is correct it does not excrete cutback. ; $context$ = sent1: that the coucal excretes cutback is correct if it is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and does not sample Incarnation. sent2: something that does not sample coucal excretes cutback and is a kind of a intentionality. sent3: if there is something such that it is not a kilderkin and does not transubstantiate the coucal is not an intangible. sent4: if something is not a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation it does excrete cutback. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a kilderkin then it does excrete cutback. sent6: something that is a Calycophyllum and does not sample Incarnation does not excrete cutback. sent7: if the coucal is not a kilderkin it does not transubstantiate. sent8: something is non-bronchial thing that does not sample prosiness if it is not a butterflyfish. sent9: if the coucal is not a kilderkin it does excrete cutback. sent10: something does sample Incarnation if it is a Calycophyllum. sent11: the coucal is not a Calycophyllum. sent12: the isobutylene does not sample Ovid if it does not transubstantiate and it is like. sent13: the aeciospore does not sample coucal. sent14: if something that does excrete cutback is a kind of a intentionality then the fact that the pound is a Calycophyllum hold. sent15: something is not a Calycophyllum if it does not transubstantiate. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a kilderkin it does not excrete cutback. sent17: if the coucal is a kind of a kilderkin it does not excrete cutback. sent18: there is something such that if it does not excrete kicker it is not a mince. sent19: something is not a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation if that it does not transubstantiate is right. sent20: if the coucal is a kind of a Calycophyllum that does not sample Incarnation then it does not excrete cutback. sent21: if something is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation it does not excrete cutback. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the coucal is not a kilderkin.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the coucal does not transubstantiate.; sent19 -> int2: if the fact that the coucal does not transubstantiate is not incorrect then it is not a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the coucal is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and does not sample Incarnation.; sent21 -> int4: the coucal does not excrete cutback if it is not a kind of a Calycophyllum and it does not sample Incarnation.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the coucal does not excrete cutback.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the coucal is not a kilderkin it does not excrete cutback.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__