the fact that there exists something such that if it is follicular it is ambulacral and is not unplayable is not correct.
sent1: the goalmouth is a kind of ambulacral thing that is unplayable if that it is follicular hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is follicular it is ambulacral and it is unplayable. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is evidentiary hold then it is a kind of a Mombasa and does plate maintenance. sent4: something that is follicular is ambulacral. sent5: something is ambulacral and unplayable if it is follicular. sent6: something does glug if it is an inspiration. sent7: something is katharobic but it does not term Berliner if it is a determinant. sent8: something is ambulacral but it is not unplayable if it is follicular. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a childhood then it is metastable.
sent8 -> int1: the goalmouth is ambulacral but it is not unplayable if it is follicular.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is follicular it is ambulacral and is not unplayable is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the goalmouth is a kind of ambulacral thing that is unplayable if that it is follicular hold. sent2: there exists something such that if it is follicular it is ambulacral and it is unplayable. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is evidentiary hold then it is a kind of a Mombasa and does plate maintenance. sent4: something that is follicular is ambulacral. sent5: something is ambulacral and unplayable if it is follicular. sent6: something does glug if it is an inspiration. sent7: something is katharobic but it does not term Berliner if it is a determinant. sent8: something is ambulacral but it is not unplayable if it is follicular. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a childhood then it is metastable. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the goalmouth is ambulacral but it is not unplayable if it is follicular.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__