the revocableness does not occur and the finalization does not occur if the ready does not occur.
sent1: the nonappearance does not occur if that both the Neanderthalness and the immaterialness occurs is false. sent2: the ready happens if either the Neanderthalness occurs or the quoits does not occur or both. sent3: if the fact that the quoits happens is not wrong the ballgame does not occur. sent4: the sneering agnostic does not occur but the selection happens if the noneffervescentness does not occur. sent5: if the fact that both the revocableness and the fibbing happens is not correct the revocableness does not occur. sent6: if the readiness does not occur the revocableness does not occur. sent7: if the sneering agnostic does not occur then the fact that the revocableness and the fibbing happens is not right. sent8: the dedication does not occur if the pantheistness does not occur. sent9: that the non-Neanderthalness and the material happens is false if the nonappearance occurs. sent10: if that the non-Neanderthalness and the material happens is false then the reaching does not occur. sent11: if the dedication does not occur then that not the measure but the barographicness occurs is not true. sent12: the revocableness does not occur and the finalization does not occur if the nonappearance does not occur. sent13: that the barographicness does not occur brings about that both the tillage and the uncomplimentariness happens. sent14: the uncomplimentariness causes that the ready does not occur but the quoits happens. sent15: the pantheist does not occur. sent16: the revocableness does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the measuring does not occur but the barographicness occurs is incorrect then the barographicness does not occur. sent18: the fact that both the Neanderthalness and the materialness happens is incorrect.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Neanderthalness happens but the material does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the Neanderthalness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the Neanderthalness happens and/or the quoits does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the readiness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ready does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the Neanderthalness and the immaterialness occurs is wrong.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the nonappearance does not occur.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the revocableness does not occur and the finalization does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the ballgame does not occur and the reach does not occur.
sent8 & sent15 -> int8: the dedication does not occur.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the measure does not occur but the barographicness occurs is wrong.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the barographicness does not occur.; sent13 & int10 -> int11: the tillage and the uncomplimentariness happens.; int11 -> int12: the uncomplimentariness occurs.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the unreadyness and the quoits happens.; int13 -> int14: the quoits occurs.; sent3 & int14 -> int15: the ballgame does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the revocableness does not occur and the finalization does not occur if the ready does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the nonappearance does not occur if that both the Neanderthalness and the immaterialness occurs is false. sent2: the ready happens if either the Neanderthalness occurs or the quoits does not occur or both. sent3: if the fact that the quoits happens is not wrong the ballgame does not occur. sent4: the sneering agnostic does not occur but the selection happens if the noneffervescentness does not occur. sent5: if the fact that both the revocableness and the fibbing happens is not correct the revocableness does not occur. sent6: if the readiness does not occur the revocableness does not occur. sent7: if the sneering agnostic does not occur then the fact that the revocableness and the fibbing happens is not right. sent8: the dedication does not occur if the pantheistness does not occur. sent9: that the non-Neanderthalness and the material happens is false if the nonappearance occurs. sent10: if that the non-Neanderthalness and the material happens is false then the reaching does not occur. sent11: if the dedication does not occur then that not the measure but the barographicness occurs is not true. sent12: the revocableness does not occur and the finalization does not occur if the nonappearance does not occur. sent13: that the barographicness does not occur brings about that both the tillage and the uncomplimentariness happens. sent14: the uncomplimentariness causes that the ready does not occur but the quoits happens. sent15: the pantheist does not occur. sent16: the revocableness does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the measuring does not occur but the barographicness occurs is incorrect then the barographicness does not occur. sent18: the fact that both the Neanderthalness and the materialness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Neanderthalness happens but the material does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the Neanderthalness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the Neanderthalness happens and/or the quoits does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the readiness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ready does not occur.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: that the Neanderthalness and the immaterialness occurs is wrong.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the nonappearance does not occur.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the revocableness does not occur and the finalization does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__