the annulet is a surf but it is not Jamesian.
sent1: something is not scarce or is not inaesthetic or both if it is not an exoskeleton. sent2: if the launchpad does drown the amygdalin superscribes inductee but it is not a denseness. sent3: if the fig is schizoid and is syncategorematic it is not a kind of a funnel. sent4: the psychodid is anaglyphic and it bears countersink. sent5: the launchpad drowns. sent6: something is both a surf and not Jamesian if the fact that it does drown hold. sent7: the fact that the bard is both a Nigerian and not syncategorematic is wrong. sent8: the fact that the annulet is not a zeta but it is syncategorematic does not hold if the launchpad is not a funnel. sent9: the fact that the amygdalin is either not destructible or not Nigerian or both is wrong if the fact that the fig is not inaesthetic is true. sent10: if the oracle is not a zeta then that the annulet is both a surf and not Jamesian is incorrect. sent11: if the incubation is indestructible but it is not a funnel then the oracle is not a zeta. sent12: the fig is a schizoid if something that superscribes inductee is not a denseness. sent13: if that the amygdalin is indestructible or is not a kind of a Nigerian or both is not true then the launchpad does not funnel. sent14: that if that something is not a zeta and is syncategorematic is false the fact that it is not syncategorematic is true is right. sent15: something does drown and is a kind of a schizoid if it is not syncategorematic. sent16: if the fig does not funnel then the incubation is indestructible but it is not a funnel. sent17: the incubation is not an exoskeleton. sent18: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is Nigerian and it is non-syncategorematic is not correct the fact that the fig is non-syncategorematic is correct hold.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the amygdalin superscribes inductee but it is not a denseness.; int1 -> int2: something does superscribe inductee but it is not a denseness.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fig is a kind of a schizoid.; sent7 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is not non-Nigerian and not syncategorematic is not right.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the fig is syncategorematic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fig is a kind of a schizoid and it is syncategorematic.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fig is not a funnel.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the incubation is indestructible but not a funnel.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the fact that the oracle is not a zeta is right.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the annulet is a kind of a surf and is not Jamesian.
sent6 -> int10: if the annulet drowns it is a surf but not Jamesian.; sent15 -> int11: if the annulet is not syncategorematic it does drown and is a schizoid.; sent14 -> int12: the annulet is not syncategorematic if the fact that it is not a zeta and is syncategorematic is not right.; sent1 -> int13: if the incubation is not a kind of an exoskeleton it is not scarce and/or is not inaesthetic.; int13 & sent17 -> int14: the incubation is not scarce and/or it is not inaesthetic.;
$hypothesis$ = the annulet is a surf but it is not Jamesian. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not scarce or is not inaesthetic or both if it is not an exoskeleton. sent2: if the launchpad does drown the amygdalin superscribes inductee but it is not a denseness. sent3: if the fig is schizoid and is syncategorematic it is not a kind of a funnel. sent4: the psychodid is anaglyphic and it bears countersink. sent5: the launchpad drowns. sent6: something is both a surf and not Jamesian if the fact that it does drown hold. sent7: the fact that the bard is both a Nigerian and not syncategorematic is wrong. sent8: the fact that the annulet is not a zeta but it is syncategorematic does not hold if the launchpad is not a funnel. sent9: the fact that the amygdalin is either not destructible or not Nigerian or both is wrong if the fact that the fig is not inaesthetic is true. sent10: if the oracle is not a zeta then that the annulet is both a surf and not Jamesian is incorrect. sent11: if the incubation is indestructible but it is not a funnel then the oracle is not a zeta. sent12: the fig is a schizoid if something that superscribes inductee is not a denseness. sent13: if that the amygdalin is indestructible or is not a kind of a Nigerian or both is not true then the launchpad does not funnel. sent14: that if that something is not a zeta and is syncategorematic is false the fact that it is not syncategorematic is true is right. sent15: something does drown and is a kind of a schizoid if it is not syncategorematic. sent16: if the fig does not funnel then the incubation is indestructible but it is not a funnel. sent17: the incubation is not an exoskeleton. sent18: the fact that if there is something such that the fact that it is Nigerian and it is non-syncategorematic is not correct the fact that the fig is non-syncategorematic is correct hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the amygdalin superscribes inductee but it is not a denseness.; int1 -> int2: something does superscribe inductee but it is not a denseness.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fig is a kind of a schizoid.; sent7 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is not non-Nigerian and not syncategorematic is not right.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the fig is syncategorematic.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fig is a kind of a schizoid and it is syncategorematic.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fig is not a funnel.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the incubation is indestructible but not a funnel.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the fact that the oracle is not a zeta is right.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__