there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sinapism then it is non-allographic thing that does not vault Wiesel.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sinapism then that it is allographic and does not vault Wiesel is correct. sent2: if the silt is a sinapism then it is non-allographic thing that does vault Wiesel. sent3: the silt is not allographic if the fact that it is a sinapism hold. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is a Fallot it is not a kind of a self-discovery and it is a perfectionism is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Zinfandel then it does not scourge save and is not a kind of a cuticle. sent6: there is something such that if it is a prestidigitation then the fact that it is not acceptive and does billow is true. sent7: if something vaults Vermont it is not a washwoman and it is not a Cenozoic. sent8: there is something such that if it does scourge recusation it does not purify Agonus. sent9: there exists something such that if it is acceptive then the fact that it does not vault fisherman is right. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sodomite it is not a kind of a plot. sent11: there is something such that if it is a blanquillo then it is not an incoherence and it does not scourge save. sent12: the silt is not allographic and does not vault Wiesel if it is a sinapism.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does vault Vermont it is both not a washwoman and not a Cenozoic.
sent7 -> int1: if the nephrotoxin vaults Vermont then it is not a washwoman and it is not a Cenozoic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sinapism then it is non-allographic thing that does not vault Wiesel. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sinapism then that it is allographic and does not vault Wiesel is correct. sent2: if the silt is a sinapism then it is non-allographic thing that does vault Wiesel. sent3: the silt is not allographic if the fact that it is a sinapism hold. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is a Fallot it is not a kind of a self-discovery and it is a perfectionism is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Zinfandel then it does not scourge save and is not a kind of a cuticle. sent6: there is something such that if it is a prestidigitation then the fact that it is not acceptive and does billow is true. sent7: if something vaults Vermont it is not a washwoman and it is not a Cenozoic. sent8: there is something such that if it does scourge recusation it does not purify Agonus. sent9: there exists something such that if it is acceptive then the fact that it does not vault fisherman is right. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a sodomite it is not a kind of a plot. sent11: there is something such that if it is a blanquillo then it is not an incoherence and it does not scourge save. sent12: the silt is not allographic and does not vault Wiesel if it is a sinapism. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__