the stationer is not apologetics but it is a emendation.
sent1: if something is not a quackery that it is a kind of a seismograph and it is non-cardiovascular is not true. sent2: that the bole is a kind of an aspirate and is a seismograph does not hold. sent3: that the vineyard is unsympathetic is right. sent4: the fact that if either something is a defaulter or it is not a quackery or both then the hemstitch is not a quackery is true. sent5: the stationer is not a verticality. sent6: if that something is cardiovascular and it does hue resinoid is not true it does not hue resinoid. sent7: the kurrat is not a seismograph. sent8: if the hematocrit either passes perplexity or is not unsympathetic or both then the kurrat is not a verticality. sent9: the fact that the stationer is a kind of apologetics thing that is a emendation does not hold. sent10: if that something is not a kind of a verticality is not incorrect it hues resinoid. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a legs. sent12: the narwhal is a defaulter and/or is not a quackery if there is something such that it is not a legs. sent13: something is a kind of a neurectomy if it is a theta. sent14: the fact that the hematocrit does not pass perplexity and is a seismograph does not hold if the kurrat pass perplexity. sent15: if something is unsympathetic it is apologetics. sent16: the fact that the stationer is not cardiovascular and is apologetics is not correct. sent17: the fact that something does not pass perplexity and it is not unsympathetic is incorrect if it is not a seismograph. sent18: the fact that the kurrat is not a seismograph is true if that it is a emendation and it is a seismograph does not hold. sent19: the hematocrit does pass perplexity and/or it is unsympathetic. sent20: if the hematocrit is apologetics the fact that the stationer is apologetics and is a emendation is not true. sent21: if that the hematocrit does not pass perplexity and it is not unsympathetic is false the stationer is not apologetics. sent22: that the stationer is not apologetics and is a emendation is not correct if the hematocrit is apologetics. sent23: if the kurrat is not a seismograph that it is cardiovascular thing that hues resinoid is not right. sent24: that the kurrat is a verticality that is not unsympathetic is not right if the hemstitch hues resinoid.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hematocrit is not unsympathetic.; assump1 -> int1: the hematocrit either does pass perplexity or is sympathetic or both.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the kurrat is not a verticality.; sent10 -> int3: if the kurrat is not a verticality it does hue resinoid.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the kurrat hues resinoid.; sent6 -> int5: if the fact that the kurrat is cardiovascular thing that hues resinoid does not hold it does not hues resinoid.; sent23 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the kurrat is cardiovascular and it does hue resinoid does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the kurrat does not hue resinoid.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the hematocrit is unsympathetic hold.; sent15 -> int10: if the hematocrit is unsympathetic then the fact that it is apologetics is not false.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the hematocrit is apologetics.; int11 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the stationer is not apologetics but it is a kind of a emendation.
sent17 -> int12: that the hematocrit does not pass perplexity and is not unsympathetic is incorrect if it is not a seismograph.;
$hypothesis$ = the stationer is not apologetics but it is a emendation. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a quackery that it is a kind of a seismograph and it is non-cardiovascular is not true. sent2: that the bole is a kind of an aspirate and is a seismograph does not hold. sent3: that the vineyard is unsympathetic is right. sent4: the fact that if either something is a defaulter or it is not a quackery or both then the hemstitch is not a quackery is true. sent5: the stationer is not a verticality. sent6: if that something is cardiovascular and it does hue resinoid is not true it does not hue resinoid. sent7: the kurrat is not a seismograph. sent8: if the hematocrit either passes perplexity or is not unsympathetic or both then the kurrat is not a verticality. sent9: the fact that the stationer is a kind of apologetics thing that is a emendation does not hold. sent10: if that something is not a kind of a verticality is not incorrect it hues resinoid. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a legs. sent12: the narwhal is a defaulter and/or is not a quackery if there is something such that it is not a legs. sent13: something is a kind of a neurectomy if it is a theta. sent14: the fact that the hematocrit does not pass perplexity and is a seismograph does not hold if the kurrat pass perplexity. sent15: if something is unsympathetic it is apologetics. sent16: the fact that the stationer is not cardiovascular and is apologetics is not correct. sent17: the fact that something does not pass perplexity and it is not unsympathetic is incorrect if it is not a seismograph. sent18: the fact that the kurrat is not a seismograph is true if that it is a emendation and it is a seismograph does not hold. sent19: the hematocrit does pass perplexity and/or it is unsympathetic. sent20: if the hematocrit is apologetics the fact that the stationer is apologetics and is a emendation is not true. sent21: if that the hematocrit does not pass perplexity and it is not unsympathetic is false the stationer is not apologetics. sent22: that the stationer is not apologetics and is a emendation is not correct if the hematocrit is apologetics. sent23: if the kurrat is not a seismograph that it is cardiovascular thing that hues resinoid is not right. sent24: that the kurrat is a verticality that is not unsympathetic is not right if the hemstitch hues resinoid. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hematocrit is not unsympathetic.; assump1 -> int1: the hematocrit either does pass perplexity or is sympathetic or both.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the kurrat is not a verticality.; sent10 -> int3: if the kurrat is not a verticality it does hue resinoid.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the kurrat hues resinoid.; sent6 -> int5: if the fact that the kurrat is cardiovascular thing that hues resinoid does not hold it does not hues resinoid.; sent23 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the kurrat is cardiovascular and it does hue resinoid does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the kurrat does not hue resinoid.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the hematocrit is unsympathetic hold.; sent15 -> int10: if the hematocrit is unsympathetic then the fact that it is apologetics is not false.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the hematocrit is apologetics.; int11 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__