the fact that both the liming roundness and the bilges occurs is false.
sent1: that the propulsiveness happens and the eavesdropping happens is wrong if the excretoriness does not occur. sent2: that the plating stir does not occur brings about that both the bilges and the downsizing occurs. sent3: the eavesdropping does not occur. sent4: the plating stir does not occur. sent5: the fact that the interpretation does not occur is not wrong if the fact that both the propulsiveness and the eavesdropping occurs is not right. sent6: the downsizing and the plating stir occurs if the admissibleness does not occur. sent7: the excretoriness happens. sent8: if the focalization happens then both the diverging and the inadmissibleness happens. sent9: if the excretoriness and the non-propulsiveness occurs then the liming roundness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the eavesdropping does not occur is not false then the propulsiveness does not occur.
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the propulsiveness does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the excretoriness but not the propulsiveness happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the liming roundness occurs.; sent2 & sent4 -> int4: the bilges happens and the downsizing occurs.; int4 -> int5: the bilging happens.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the interpretation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the liming roundness and the bilges occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the propulsiveness happens and the eavesdropping happens is wrong if the excretoriness does not occur. sent2: that the plating stir does not occur brings about that both the bilges and the downsizing occurs. sent3: the eavesdropping does not occur. sent4: the plating stir does not occur. sent5: the fact that the interpretation does not occur is not wrong if the fact that both the propulsiveness and the eavesdropping occurs is not right. sent6: the downsizing and the plating stir occurs if the admissibleness does not occur. sent7: the excretoriness happens. sent8: if the focalization happens then both the diverging and the inadmissibleness happens. sent9: if the excretoriness and the non-propulsiveness occurs then the liming roundness occurs. sent10: if the fact that the eavesdropping does not occur is not false then the propulsiveness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: the propulsiveness does not occur.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the excretoriness but not the propulsiveness happens.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the liming roundness occurs.; sent2 & sent4 -> int4: the bilges happens and the downsizing occurs.; int4 -> int5: the bilging happens.; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__