that the altimeter is an astonishment is true.
sent1: the nevirapine is not a roselle. sent2: the airstrip is not an astonishment. sent3: that the airstrip is an astonishment but it is not a deposit is not right. sent4: if the fact that the altimeter does tweeze apiary and is a roselle is incorrect that it does not company nevirapine is correct. sent5: the airstrip does not company nevirapine if the fact that it is a kind of a deposit and is not a roselle is wrong. sent6: if the airstrip is not a roselle the fact that it is not a kind of a solitude is correct. sent7: that the altimeter is not a kind of an astonishment hold if it is not a kind of a roselle. sent8: a sailing companies criollo and does not tweeze apiary. sent9: The apiary tweezes airstrip. sent10: if something is not a kind of a deposit then it does not company nevirapine. sent11: something does tweeze apiary and is not a kind of an astonishment if it companies nevirapine. sent12: if something does not tweeze apiary then the airstrip is a kind of a solitude. sent13: if the fact that something is a roselle and it is a solitude is not right it is not a kind of an astonishment. sent14: if the airstrip is not a roselle then that the altimeter is a roselle and a solitude is false. sent15: that if something does not company criollo then it is a kind of a solitude that does company nevirapine hold. sent16: the airstrip companies nevirapine if it tweezes apiary. sent17: the airstrip tweezes apiary. sent18: the altimeter does not deposit if it is not an astonishment. sent19: that the airstrip companies nevirapine and is a kind of a solitude is not right. sent20: if the fact that the altimeter is an astonishment that is not a roselle is not correct it does not company nevirapine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the airstrip deposits but it is not a roselle is not right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the airstrip does not company nevirapine.; sent16 & sent17 -> int2: the airstrip does company nevirapine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the airstrip is a kind of a deposit but it is not a roselle is not false.; int4 -> int5: the airstrip is not a roselle.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the altimeter is a roselle and a solitude is false.; sent13 -> int7: the altimeter is not an astonishment if the fact that it is a roselle that is a kind of a solitude does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the pogonion does tweeze apiary.
sent11 -> int8: the pogonion tweezes apiary but it is not an astonishment if it companies nevirapine.; sent15 -> int9: if the pogonion does not company criollo it is a kind of a solitude and it companies nevirapine.;
$hypothesis$ = that the altimeter is an astonishment is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the nevirapine is not a roselle. sent2: the airstrip is not an astonishment. sent3: that the airstrip is an astonishment but it is not a deposit is not right. sent4: if the fact that the altimeter does tweeze apiary and is a roselle is incorrect that it does not company nevirapine is correct. sent5: the airstrip does not company nevirapine if the fact that it is a kind of a deposit and is not a roselle is wrong. sent6: if the airstrip is not a roselle the fact that it is not a kind of a solitude is correct. sent7: that the altimeter is not a kind of an astonishment hold if it is not a kind of a roselle. sent8: a sailing companies criollo and does not tweeze apiary. sent9: The apiary tweezes airstrip. sent10: if something is not a kind of a deposit then it does not company nevirapine. sent11: something does tweeze apiary and is not a kind of an astonishment if it companies nevirapine. sent12: if something does not tweeze apiary then the airstrip is a kind of a solitude. sent13: if the fact that something is a roselle and it is a solitude is not right it is not a kind of an astonishment. sent14: if the airstrip is not a roselle then that the altimeter is a roselle and a solitude is false. sent15: that if something does not company criollo then it is a kind of a solitude that does company nevirapine hold. sent16: the airstrip companies nevirapine if it tweezes apiary. sent17: the airstrip tweezes apiary. sent18: the altimeter does not deposit if it is not an astonishment. sent19: that the airstrip companies nevirapine and is a kind of a solitude is not right. sent20: if the fact that the altimeter is an astonishment that is not a roselle is not correct it does not company nevirapine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the airstrip deposits but it is not a roselle is not right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the airstrip does not company nevirapine.; sent16 & sent17 -> int2: the airstrip does company nevirapine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the airstrip is a kind of a deposit but it is not a roselle is not false.; int4 -> int5: the airstrip is not a roselle.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: that the altimeter is a roselle and a solitude is false.; sent13 -> int7: the altimeter is not an astonishment if the fact that it is a roselle that is a kind of a solitude does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__