the hedger does not perplex downstroke.
sent1: if something is conscientious and does not stigmatize antiquark it is a Kenyata. sent2: the tentorium perplexes Epimedium and it is a Micronor if that the Clay is not a fathom hold. sent3: something is not a throbbing if it does perplex Epimedium. sent4: if the half-moon is not a octoroon the Clay is conscientious thing that does not stigmatize antiquark. sent5: the kaffiyeh does not excise permeation. sent6: something is not a kind of a throbbing if that it is not a Micronor and does not perplex Epimedium does not hold. sent7: something that derails spillover is noneffervescent and is not a kind of a fathom. sent8: the kaffiyeh is not homiletics. sent9: if the tentorium is not a kind of a throbbing that the kaffiyeh does not perplex downstroke and it does not excise permeation is false. sent10: something does derail spillover if it is a Kenyata. sent11: if the kaffiyeh does excise permeation then that it is not a kind of a fathom and it perplexes Epimedium does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it skedaddles and it does stigmatize antiquark is false. sent13: if that the half-moon is a kind of a octoroon and does engage does not hold it is not a octoroon. sent14: something is not a throbbing if it perplexes downstroke. sent15: the saran is a kind of a Micronor. sent16: the hedger does not excise permeation if there is something such that that it does not perplex Epimedium and is a Micronor is not right. sent17: if the fact that the hedger is not a kind of a throbbing hold then it does excise permeation. sent18: the fact that the half-moon is a kind of a octoroon and does engage is not true if it is not a kind of a natural. sent19: the potherb does not perplex Epimedium. sent20: the fact that if the kaffiyeh does fathom that the kaffiyeh does not perplex Epimedium but it is a Micronor does not hold is true. sent21: the hedger is a lithomancer. sent22: that the kaffiyeh is not a Micronor and does not perplex Epimedium is not correct if the tentorium is not a kind of a fathom. sent23: the agar is non-mystic if there is something such that the fact that it does not perplex downstroke and does not excise permeation is false.
sent14 -> int1: the hedger is not a throbbing if it does perplex downstroke.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hedger does perplex downstroke.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the hedger is not a throbbing hold.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the hedger does excise permeation.;
the hedger perplexes downstroke.
sent6 -> int4: the kaffiyeh is not a kind of a throbbing if that it is not a Micronor and it does not perplex Epimedium is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the hedger does not perplex downstroke. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is conscientious and does not stigmatize antiquark it is a Kenyata. sent2: the tentorium perplexes Epimedium and it is a Micronor if that the Clay is not a fathom hold. sent3: something is not a throbbing if it does perplex Epimedium. sent4: if the half-moon is not a octoroon the Clay is conscientious thing that does not stigmatize antiquark. sent5: the kaffiyeh does not excise permeation. sent6: something is not a kind of a throbbing if that it is not a Micronor and does not perplex Epimedium does not hold. sent7: something that derails spillover is noneffervescent and is not a kind of a fathom. sent8: the kaffiyeh is not homiletics. sent9: if the tentorium is not a kind of a throbbing that the kaffiyeh does not perplex downstroke and it does not excise permeation is false. sent10: something does derail spillover if it is a Kenyata. sent11: if the kaffiyeh does excise permeation then that it is not a kind of a fathom and it perplexes Epimedium does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that that it skedaddles and it does stigmatize antiquark is false. sent13: if that the half-moon is a kind of a octoroon and does engage does not hold it is not a octoroon. sent14: something is not a throbbing if it perplexes downstroke. sent15: the saran is a kind of a Micronor. sent16: the hedger does not excise permeation if there is something such that that it does not perplex Epimedium and is a Micronor is not right. sent17: if the fact that the hedger is not a kind of a throbbing hold then it does excise permeation. sent18: the fact that the half-moon is a kind of a octoroon and does engage is not true if it is not a kind of a natural. sent19: the potherb does not perplex Epimedium. sent20: the fact that if the kaffiyeh does fathom that the kaffiyeh does not perplex Epimedium but it is a Micronor does not hold is true. sent21: the hedger is a lithomancer. sent22: that the kaffiyeh is not a Micronor and does not perplex Epimedium is not correct if the tentorium is not a kind of a fathom. sent23: the agar is non-mystic if there is something such that the fact that it does not perplex downstroke and does not excise permeation is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the hedger is not a throbbing if it does perplex downstroke.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hedger does perplex downstroke.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the hedger is not a throbbing hold.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the hedger does excise permeation.; __UNKNOWN__