the hematite is a spear but not atherosclerotic.
sent1: if the fact that the coyol is not a Lilium and trisects Delaware is not true the cavity is haptic. sent2: the coyol is not a spear and it does not squire earliness if the hematite is not a kind of a bottom. sent3: the cavity trisects Delaware if the coyol is a kind of a langouste. sent4: that the coyol is not a Lilium but it does trisect Delaware does not hold if there is something such that it is a langouste. sent5: the hematite is a allegorizer. sent6: if the coyol is not a kind of a spear then it is non-atherosclerotic thing that is not haptic. sent7: something is a langouste. sent8: that the hematite spears and it is atherosclerotic does not hold. sent9: if there are haptic things the fact that the hematite is both a spear and not atherosclerotic is not correct. sent10: if the coyol does not trisect Delaware then that the cavity is haptic is correct.
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the coyol is not a Lilium but it does trisect Delaware is incorrect.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the cavity is haptic.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is haptic.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the cavity trisects Delaware.
$hypothesis$ = the hematite is a spear but not atherosclerotic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the coyol is not a Lilium and trisects Delaware is not true the cavity is haptic. sent2: the coyol is not a spear and it does not squire earliness if the hematite is not a kind of a bottom. sent3: the cavity trisects Delaware if the coyol is a kind of a langouste. sent4: that the coyol is not a Lilium but it does trisect Delaware does not hold if there is something such that it is a langouste. sent5: the hematite is a allegorizer. sent6: if the coyol is not a kind of a spear then it is non-atherosclerotic thing that is not haptic. sent7: something is a langouste. sent8: that the hematite spears and it is atherosclerotic does not hold. sent9: if there are haptic things the fact that the hematite is both a spear and not atherosclerotic is not correct. sent10: if the coyol does not trisect Delaware then that the cavity is haptic is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the coyol is not a Lilium but it does trisect Delaware is incorrect.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the cavity is haptic.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is haptic.; int3 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__