the tendergreen is not cryptanalytic.
sent1: the scut is a Goldwyn and/or it is a Kroto if the accumulation is not four-wheel. sent2: the tendergreen is brazen. sent3: a subspace is purposeful. sent4: if something is not a subspace it is not a monorchism and not purposeful. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of cryptanalytic thing that is not a subspace is not right it is not cryptanalytic. sent6: the accumulation is purposeful if the scut is non-brazen and non-cryptanalytic. sent7: if the fact that the scut is not purposeful is right then the fact that the tendergreen is cryptanalytic but it is not a subspace is wrong. sent8: if the accumulation is not non-purposeful then that the tendergreen is cryptanalytic is not wrong. sent9: the accumulation is a subspace if the scut is a kind of non-brazen thing that does not sparkle phillipsite. sent10: if the tendergreen sparkles sprinter then it is a subspace. sent11: if the fact that the scut is non-brazen thing that is purposeful hold then the accumulation is a kind of a subspace. sent12: the accumulation is not non-brazen. sent13: the accumulation is a subspace if the scut is brazen but it does not sparkle phillipsite. sent14: if something is not cryptanalytic it rates or it is not a subspace or both. sent15: the scut is not brazen and it does not sparkle phillipsite. sent16: the scut is a kind of a subspace if the accumulation does not sparkle phillipsite and is not purposeful.
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the accumulation is a subspace.; sent3 -> int2: the accumulation is purposeful if the fact that it is a subspace is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the accumulation is purposeful.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the tendergreen is not cryptanalytic.
sent5 -> int4: if that the tendergreen is cryptanalytic but it is not a subspace is not correct it is not cryptanalytic.;
$hypothesis$ = the tendergreen is not cryptanalytic. ; $context$ = sent1: the scut is a Goldwyn and/or it is a Kroto if the accumulation is not four-wheel. sent2: the tendergreen is brazen. sent3: a subspace is purposeful. sent4: if something is not a subspace it is not a monorchism and not purposeful. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of cryptanalytic thing that is not a subspace is not right it is not cryptanalytic. sent6: the accumulation is purposeful if the scut is non-brazen and non-cryptanalytic. sent7: if the fact that the scut is not purposeful is right then the fact that the tendergreen is cryptanalytic but it is not a subspace is wrong. sent8: if the accumulation is not non-purposeful then that the tendergreen is cryptanalytic is not wrong. sent9: the accumulation is a subspace if the scut is a kind of non-brazen thing that does not sparkle phillipsite. sent10: if the tendergreen sparkles sprinter then it is a subspace. sent11: if the fact that the scut is non-brazen thing that is purposeful hold then the accumulation is a kind of a subspace. sent12: the accumulation is not non-brazen. sent13: the accumulation is a subspace if the scut is brazen but it does not sparkle phillipsite. sent14: if something is not cryptanalytic it rates or it is not a subspace or both. sent15: the scut is not brazen and it does not sparkle phillipsite. sent16: the scut is a kind of a subspace if the accumulation does not sparkle phillipsite and is not purposeful. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the accumulation is a subspace.; sent3 -> int2: the accumulation is purposeful if the fact that it is a subspace is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the accumulation is purposeful.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__