the corpuscularness happens.
sent1: if the fact that the dissociating Independence does not occur is true then the yelling kosher occurs. sent2: the dissociating Independence happens and the closedness occurs if the self-destruction does not occur. sent3: that the staticness does not occur is correct if the supportiveness does not occur or the twenty-one does not occur or both. sent4: the staticness happens or the twenty-one happens or both. sent5: the corpuscularness occurs if that the degeneration but not the corpuscularness occurs is not correct. sent6: the detoxification is caused by that the degeneration happens. sent7: the static occurs and the yelling kosher occurs if the dissociating Independence does not occur. sent8: the degeneration occurs. sent9: the fact that the degeneration and the non-corpuscularness occurs does not hold if the detoxification does not occur. sent10: either the unsupportiveness or the twenty-one or both happens. sent11: the fact that if that the twenty-one does not occur is correct the marching occurs and the supportiveness happens is true. sent12: that the yelling kosher does not occur leads to that the stewing occurs. sent13: that the twenty-one does not occur hold if not the yelling kosher but the staticness happens. sent14: that the backpacking does not occur and/or the dissociating calefaction occurs is brought about by that the aggregating sceneshifter does not occur. sent15: the detoxification does not occur if that the marching or the corpuscularness or both happens is false. sent16: the dissociating Independence does not occur if the fact that the dissociating Independence and the closedness occurs is not true. sent17: if the detoxification happens and the corpuscularness happens that the march does not occur is right. sent18: the fact that the fact that the dissociating Independence and the closedness happens hold does not hold. sent19: the supportiveness does not occur and/or the twenty-one does not occur if the marching does not occur.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the detoxification happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the corpuscularness happens is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the detoxification and the corpuscularness happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the march does not occur.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the supportiveness does not occur or the twenty-one does not occur or both.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the staticness does not occur is true.; sent16 & sent18 -> int6: the dissociating Independence does not occur.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the static and the yelling kosher occurs.; int7 -> int8: the static happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the corpuscularness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the corpuscularness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the dissociating Independence does not occur is true then the yelling kosher occurs. sent2: the dissociating Independence happens and the closedness occurs if the self-destruction does not occur. sent3: that the staticness does not occur is correct if the supportiveness does not occur or the twenty-one does not occur or both. sent4: the staticness happens or the twenty-one happens or both. sent5: the corpuscularness occurs if that the degeneration but not the corpuscularness occurs is not correct. sent6: the detoxification is caused by that the degeneration happens. sent7: the static occurs and the yelling kosher occurs if the dissociating Independence does not occur. sent8: the degeneration occurs. sent9: the fact that the degeneration and the non-corpuscularness occurs does not hold if the detoxification does not occur. sent10: either the unsupportiveness or the twenty-one or both happens. sent11: the fact that if that the twenty-one does not occur is correct the marching occurs and the supportiveness happens is true. sent12: that the yelling kosher does not occur leads to that the stewing occurs. sent13: that the twenty-one does not occur hold if not the yelling kosher but the staticness happens. sent14: that the backpacking does not occur and/or the dissociating calefaction occurs is brought about by that the aggregating sceneshifter does not occur. sent15: the detoxification does not occur if that the marching or the corpuscularness or both happens is false. sent16: the dissociating Independence does not occur if the fact that the dissociating Independence and the closedness occurs is not true. sent17: if the detoxification happens and the corpuscularness happens that the march does not occur is right. sent18: the fact that the fact that the dissociating Independence and the closedness happens hold does not hold. sent19: the supportiveness does not occur and/or the twenty-one does not occur if the marching does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the detoxification happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the corpuscularness happens is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the detoxification and the corpuscularness happens.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the march does not occur.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the supportiveness does not occur or the twenty-one does not occur or both.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the staticness does not occur is true.; sent16 & sent18 -> int6: the dissociating Independence does not occur.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the static and the yelling kosher occurs.; int7 -> int8: the static happens.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__