there exists something such that if it does detick HND then that it does not conduct and it is a Cariama is not true.
sent1: if the australopithecine deticks HND then it does not conduct and is a Cariama. sent2: there exists something such that if it deticks HND then it does not conduct and is a Cariama. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a preexistence the fact that it is a basined and it is a phycology is not true. sent4: that the australopithecine does conduct and it is a Cariama is incorrect if it deticks HND. sent5: if something deticks HND the fact that it does conduct and is a Cariama does not hold. sent6: if the seven is membranous then the fact that it is a Cariama and it deticks bandsman is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it does detick HND that it conducts and is a kind of a Cariama is wrong. sent8: the fact that the bandsman is not branchless and is nonlinear is not true if it is inconstant.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does detick HND then that it does not conduct and it is a Cariama is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the australopithecine deticks HND then it does not conduct and is a Cariama. sent2: there exists something such that if it deticks HND then it does not conduct and is a Cariama. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a preexistence the fact that it is a basined and it is a phycology is not true. sent4: that the australopithecine does conduct and it is a Cariama is incorrect if it deticks HND. sent5: if something deticks HND the fact that it does conduct and is a Cariama does not hold. sent6: if the seven is membranous then the fact that it is a Cariama and it deticks bandsman is not correct. sent7: there exists something such that if it does detick HND that it conducts and is a kind of a Cariama is wrong. sent8: the fact that the bandsman is not branchless and is nonlinear is not true if it is inconstant. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__