the mesocarp is a Dangla.
sent1: the alligatorfish is a tapster if it does crop Lopholatilus. sent2: the mesocarp is not a kind of a clutter. sent3: the fact that the variorum is not diffident and/or it is not a Petrarch is false. sent4: if the filth is a kind of a tapster then that the alligatorfish does not crop Lopholatilus but it is a kind of a practice is not true. sent5: if the tin is amenorrheic the phrontistery is not hydric but it is abundant. sent6: if the fact that the mesocarp is not linguistics and it is not a kind of a tapster is incorrect the Tidewater is not a tapster. sent7: something is both a Dangla and linguistics if it is not a kind of a practice. sent8: the alligatorfish is a tapster if the mesocarp is not a kind of a practice. sent9: the mesocarp is a Dangla if the wintergreen is a kind of a Dangla. sent10: if the mesocarp is not linguistics then the alligatorfish is not a tapster. sent11: the alligatorfish crops Lopholatilus. sent12: if something does not practice the fact that it is not linguistics and it is not a tapster is not correct. sent13: if something is not linguistics and it does not practice then it is not a Dangla. sent14: either the mesocarp is not a judiciary or it does not bullshit addict or both. sent15: the mesocarp is not a Dangla if that it is non-linguistics and/or does not crop Lopholatilus is not correct. sent16: the alligatorfish is not a kind of a tapster if the mesocarp is not a practice. sent17: if there exists something such that it is not nonwoody then the filth is a tapster. sent18: The Lopholatilus crops alligatorfish. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-hydric thing that is abundant the aril is not nonwoody. sent20: the fact that if that something is non-linguistics and/or not a practice is not correct it is not a Dangla is not false. sent21: the tin is amenorrheic and is Teutonic. sent22: the alligatorfish is not anamnestic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mesocarp is not linguistics or it is not a practice or both.; assump1 & sent10 & sent16 -> int1: the alligatorfish is not a tapster.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the alligatorfish is a tapster.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the mesocarp is not linguistics and/or does not practice is not right.; sent20 -> int5: the mesocarp is not a kind of a Dangla if the fact that it is not linguistics and/or it is not a practice is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the Tidewater is not a kind of a tapster is right.
sent12 -> int6: the fact that the mesocarp is non-linguistics thing that is not a tapster is wrong if it is not a practice.;
$hypothesis$ = the mesocarp is a Dangla. ; $context$ = sent1: the alligatorfish is a tapster if it does crop Lopholatilus. sent2: the mesocarp is not a kind of a clutter. sent3: the fact that the variorum is not diffident and/or it is not a Petrarch is false. sent4: if the filth is a kind of a tapster then that the alligatorfish does not crop Lopholatilus but it is a kind of a practice is not true. sent5: if the tin is amenorrheic the phrontistery is not hydric but it is abundant. sent6: if the fact that the mesocarp is not linguistics and it is not a kind of a tapster is incorrect the Tidewater is not a tapster. sent7: something is both a Dangla and linguistics if it is not a kind of a practice. sent8: the alligatorfish is a tapster if the mesocarp is not a kind of a practice. sent9: the mesocarp is a Dangla if the wintergreen is a kind of a Dangla. sent10: if the mesocarp is not linguistics then the alligatorfish is not a tapster. sent11: the alligatorfish crops Lopholatilus. sent12: if something does not practice the fact that it is not linguistics and it is not a tapster is not correct. sent13: if something is not linguistics and it does not practice then it is not a Dangla. sent14: either the mesocarp is not a judiciary or it does not bullshit addict or both. sent15: the mesocarp is not a Dangla if that it is non-linguistics and/or does not crop Lopholatilus is not correct. sent16: the alligatorfish is not a kind of a tapster if the mesocarp is not a practice. sent17: if there exists something such that it is not nonwoody then the filth is a tapster. sent18: The Lopholatilus crops alligatorfish. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a kind of non-hydric thing that is abundant the aril is not nonwoody. sent20: the fact that if that something is non-linguistics and/or not a practice is not correct it is not a Dangla is not false. sent21: the tin is amenorrheic and is Teutonic. sent22: the alligatorfish is not anamnestic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mesocarp is not linguistics or it is not a practice or both.; assump1 & sent10 & sent16 -> int1: the alligatorfish is not a tapster.; sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the alligatorfish is a tapster.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the mesocarp is not linguistics and/or does not practice is not right.; sent20 -> int5: the mesocarp is not a kind of a Dangla if the fact that it is not linguistics and/or it is not a practice is not true.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__