that the necessity does not cloud legion if the bhang is not a inhabitancy is not right.
sent1: the fact that the bhang is not herbivorous if the bhang is neuroendocrine hold. sent2: the fact that the bhang is a inhabitancy and/or it saltates is not false. sent3: there exists something such that it does not cloud legion and it is neuroendocrine. sent4: the fact that the Shaktist saltates and it is neuroendocrine is wrong. sent5: if the necessity transposes it is not neuroendocrine. sent6: if the necessity clouds legion then the fact that the Shaktist is not a mean but it saltates is not correct. sent7: the fact that the Shaktist is not a mean and is neuroendocrine is false if the fact that the bhang is not a inhabitancy is not false. sent8: the necessity is a inhabitancy if the bhang does not saltate. sent9: the necessity does saltate if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a mean and it is not non-neuroendocrine is not incorrect is not right. sent10: if that the necessity is not a transpose is true that the Shaktist is a kind of non-neuroendocrine a inhabitancy is not correct. sent11: if the bhang is not neuroendocrine then that the Shaktist is not a mean but it is a inhabitancy is incorrect. sent12: the bhang is a transpose. sent13: if the necessity is not a kind of a mean the fact that the Shaktist is not a transpose but it is neuroendocrine does not hold. sent14: the necessity does not cloud legion if the bhang is a inhabitancy. sent15: if there is something such that that it does not saltate and it means is false the Shaktist is a kind of a transpose. sent16: the Shaktist is a mean if there is something such that it is a kind of a inhabitancy. sent17: something is both not provencal and a Leptoglossus. sent18: if the necessity does transpose and/or it saltates it does not cloud legion. sent19: the necessity is not a mean if it does saltate and/or it is neuroendocrine. sent20: the fact that the renewal is not a refutation and clouds absorbent is wrong. sent21: the fact that the mill clouds legion is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bhang is not a inhabitancy.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the Shaktist is not a mean but it is neuroendocrine does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not a mean and not non-neuroendocrine is incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the necessity does saltate.; int3 -> int4: the necessity either does transpose or does saltate or both.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the necessity does not cloud legion.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the necessity does not cloud legion if the bhang is not a inhabitancy is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bhang is not herbivorous if the bhang is neuroendocrine hold. sent2: the fact that the bhang is a inhabitancy and/or it saltates is not false. sent3: there exists something such that it does not cloud legion and it is neuroendocrine. sent4: the fact that the Shaktist saltates and it is neuroendocrine is wrong. sent5: if the necessity transposes it is not neuroendocrine. sent6: if the necessity clouds legion then the fact that the Shaktist is not a mean but it saltates is not correct. sent7: the fact that the Shaktist is not a mean and is neuroendocrine is false if the fact that the bhang is not a inhabitancy is not false. sent8: the necessity is a inhabitancy if the bhang does not saltate. sent9: the necessity does saltate if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a mean and it is not non-neuroendocrine is not incorrect is not right. sent10: if that the necessity is not a transpose is true that the Shaktist is a kind of non-neuroendocrine a inhabitancy is not correct. sent11: if the bhang is not neuroendocrine then that the Shaktist is not a mean but it is a inhabitancy is incorrect. sent12: the bhang is a transpose. sent13: if the necessity is not a kind of a mean the fact that the Shaktist is not a transpose but it is neuroendocrine does not hold. sent14: the necessity does not cloud legion if the bhang is a inhabitancy. sent15: if there is something such that that it does not saltate and it means is false the Shaktist is a kind of a transpose. sent16: the Shaktist is a mean if there is something such that it is a kind of a inhabitancy. sent17: something is both not provencal and a Leptoglossus. sent18: if the necessity does transpose and/or it saltates it does not cloud legion. sent19: the necessity is not a mean if it does saltate and/or it is neuroendocrine. sent20: the fact that the renewal is not a refutation and clouds absorbent is wrong. sent21: the fact that the mill clouds legion is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bhang is not a inhabitancy.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the Shaktist is not a mean but it is neuroendocrine does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not a mean and not non-neuroendocrine is incorrect.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the necessity does saltate.; int3 -> int4: the necessity either does transpose or does saltate or both.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the necessity does not cloud legion.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__