the fact that the forte is not non-animist and is non-impressionist does not hold.
sent1: the wave is fortunate. sent2: the fact that the forte is a kind of an animist and is an impressionist is incorrect. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a bolometer but it is a kind of an animist is incorrect then it is not a chevre. sent4: the wave suborns grouped. sent5: that the forte is an animist and not non-impressionist is false if the wave is not a non-impressionist. sent6: there exists something such that it does not lob Macon and is a Soricidae. sent7: if there is something such that it is a shorts then the pinfold does not lob Macon and is not fortunate. sent8: if something is not a chevre it does suborn grouped and is an impressionist. sent9: if the fact that the forte does not suborn grouped is correct then the fact that the wave is an animist but it does not suborn grouped is not correct. sent10: the fact that the wave is impressionist and not an animist is not true. sent11: the fact that the forte is both animist and not impressionist is not right if the wave is impressionist. sent12: if something is a chevre the fact that it is animist is right. sent13: if the wave is not impressionist then that the forte does suborn grouped and is not impressionist is not true. sent14: The grouped suborns wave. sent15: if the pinfold does not lob Macon and it is not fortunate then it is a Soricidae. sent16: if the fact that the wave is fortunate hold that it is a kind of a bolometer and does not suborn grouped does not hold. sent17: if something is a Soricidae the fact that it is not a bolometer and it is not non-animist is false. sent18: the wave is shorts and it is a trill.
the forte is both an animist and not an impressionist.
sent12 -> int1: the forte is an animist if the fact that it is a chevre is not incorrect.; sent16 & sent1 -> int2: that the wave is a kind of a bolometer and does not suborn grouped is not right.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is a bolometer and it does not suborn grouped hold is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the forte is not non-animist and is non-impressionist does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the wave is fortunate. sent2: the fact that the forte is a kind of an animist and is an impressionist is incorrect. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a bolometer but it is a kind of an animist is incorrect then it is not a chevre. sent4: the wave suborns grouped. sent5: that the forte is an animist and not non-impressionist is false if the wave is not a non-impressionist. sent6: there exists something such that it does not lob Macon and is a Soricidae. sent7: if there is something such that it is a shorts then the pinfold does not lob Macon and is not fortunate. sent8: if something is not a chevre it does suborn grouped and is an impressionist. sent9: if the fact that the forte does not suborn grouped is correct then the fact that the wave is an animist but it does not suborn grouped is not correct. sent10: the fact that the wave is impressionist and not an animist is not true. sent11: the fact that the forte is both animist and not impressionist is not right if the wave is impressionist. sent12: if something is a chevre the fact that it is animist is right. sent13: if the wave is not impressionist then that the forte does suborn grouped and is not impressionist is not true. sent14: The grouped suborns wave. sent15: if the pinfold does not lob Macon and it is not fortunate then it is a Soricidae. sent16: if the fact that the wave is fortunate hold that it is a kind of a bolometer and does not suborn grouped does not hold. sent17: if something is a Soricidae the fact that it is not a bolometer and it is not non-animist is false. sent18: the wave is shorts and it is a trill. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__