the Ghanian does not troll.
sent1: the spa is preclinical. sent2: either the spa is inappropriate or it is auxinic or both if the leaf-roller is not a kind of a troll. sent3: the Ghanian is a troll if the fact that the champagne is a kind of a methanol is not wrong. sent4: if the agateware is auxinic the fact that the champagne is a kind of a methanol is not incorrect. sent5: if the leaf-roller is a chlordiazepoxide the airbrush is inappropriate. sent6: the leaf-roller is not a troll. sent7: the leaf-roller is a chlordiazepoxide if something is not non-schizophrenic but preclinical. sent8: the spa is a Rameau and it is a schizophrenic. sent9: the spa is a Rameau if that the champagne is not non-preclinical is right. sent10: that something is not schizophrenic and it is not preclinical is incorrect if it is a chlordiazepoxide. sent11: something is a chlordiazepoxide if it is auxinic. sent12: if the airbrush is inappropriate then the agateware is auxinic. sent13: the fact that if something is inappropriate then it is a chlordiazepoxide hold.
sent8 -> int1: the spa is schizophrenic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the spa is both schizophrenic and preclinical.; int2 -> int3: something is a kind of a schizophrenic and is preclinical.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the leaf-roller is a kind of a chlordiazepoxide.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the airbrush is inappropriate.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the agateware is auxinic.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the champagne is a methanol hold.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the stalk is a hat and it is a methanol.
sent10 -> int8: that the spa is not schizophrenic and it is not preclinical does not hold if it is a kind of a chlordiazepoxide.; sent2 & sent6 -> int9: the spa is inappropriate or it is auxinic or both.; sent13 -> int10: the spa is a chlordiazepoxide if it is not appropriate.; sent11 -> int11: the spa is a chlordiazepoxide if the fact that it is auxinic is right.; int9 & int10 & int11 -> int12: the spa is a chlordiazepoxide.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the spa is not schizophrenic and not preclinical is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Ghanian does not troll. ; $context$ = sent1: the spa is preclinical. sent2: either the spa is inappropriate or it is auxinic or both if the leaf-roller is not a kind of a troll. sent3: the Ghanian is a troll if the fact that the champagne is a kind of a methanol is not wrong. sent4: if the agateware is auxinic the fact that the champagne is a kind of a methanol is not incorrect. sent5: if the leaf-roller is a chlordiazepoxide the airbrush is inappropriate. sent6: the leaf-roller is not a troll. sent7: the leaf-roller is a chlordiazepoxide if something is not non-schizophrenic but preclinical. sent8: the spa is a Rameau and it is a schizophrenic. sent9: the spa is a Rameau if that the champagne is not non-preclinical is right. sent10: that something is not schizophrenic and it is not preclinical is incorrect if it is a chlordiazepoxide. sent11: something is a chlordiazepoxide if it is auxinic. sent12: if the airbrush is inappropriate then the agateware is auxinic. sent13: the fact that if something is inappropriate then it is a chlordiazepoxide hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the spa is schizophrenic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the spa is both schizophrenic and preclinical.; int2 -> int3: something is a kind of a schizophrenic and is preclinical.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the leaf-roller is a kind of a chlordiazepoxide.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the airbrush is inappropriate.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the agateware is auxinic.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: that the champagne is a methanol hold.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__