something compasses and it is a Chaldean.
sent1: the palmist is a compass if that it is a kind of a gecko that does not interfere labyrinth is wrong. sent2: the totality is not a Clio if it is both not a compass and not an afferent. sent3: the palmist is a Chaldean. sent4: the totality is not euphoric if it is not a Clio and it is not a mind. sent5: there is something such that that it is a bridle and it is a cufflink does not hold. sent6: the bonefish is euphoric if the fact that it is afferent and not a compass is wrong. sent7: there is something such that that it is not a bridle and is a cufflink is wrong. sent8: the totality is not a Clio if the fact that it is unexpendable is correct. sent9: the totality does compass if there is something such that the fact that it is not a mind and it is a Chaldean does not hold. sent10: the totality is not a Clio and does not mind if it is unexpendable. sent11: the totality is unexpendable if the bonefish is an afferent. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not euphoric then that that the palmist is a gecko but it does not interfere labyrinth is wrong is correct. sent13: the palmist is both a Austrian and unexpendable.
$hypothesis$ = something compasses and it is a Chaldean. ; $context$ = sent1: the palmist is a compass if that it is a kind of a gecko that does not interfere labyrinth is wrong. sent2: the totality is not a Clio if it is both not a compass and not an afferent. sent3: the palmist is a Chaldean. sent4: the totality is not euphoric if it is not a Clio and it is not a mind. sent5: there is something such that that it is a bridle and it is a cufflink does not hold. sent6: the bonefish is euphoric if the fact that it is afferent and not a compass is wrong. sent7: there is something such that that it is not a bridle and is a cufflink is wrong. sent8: the totality is not a Clio if the fact that it is unexpendable is correct. sent9: the totality does compass if there is something such that the fact that it is not a mind and it is a Chaldean does not hold. sent10: the totality is not a Clio and does not mind if it is unexpendable. sent11: the totality is unexpendable if the bonefish is an afferent. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not euphoric then that that the palmist is a gecko but it does not interfere labyrinth is wrong is correct. sent13: the palmist is both a Austrian and unexpendable. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__