the bunco does not occur.
sent1: the gutsiness does not occur. sent2: that the negotiating amnion happens and the ambulatory happens is not true. sent3: the payment does not occur and the livableness does not occur if the negotiating academicianship occurs. sent4: the glaring happens. sent5: the fact that the bunco does not occur is not incorrect if the payment does not occur or the negotiating academicianship occurs or both. sent6: the dimming happens if the cautery does not occur and the rhyming does not occur. sent7: the negotiating diversion does not occur if the fact that the negotiating amnion occurs and the ambulatoriness happens is not correct. sent8: that the make-believe happens and/or the atheisticness occurs is brought about by that the negotiating diversion does not occur. sent9: the electromyography happens. sent10: the conjugalness occurs if the payment occurs. sent11: the payment happens and/or the negotiating academicianship occurs. sent12: the rhyming does not occur. sent13: both the non-perinealness and the non-hypophysealness happens. sent14: the negotiating sweatshop happens. sent15: that the negotiating academicianship occurs leads to the conjugalness. sent16: that the payment does not occur but the conjugalness happens is caused by that the negotiating sweatshop does not occur. sent17: if the dimness but not the gutsiness happens then the bunco occurs. sent18: that the negotiating sprue does not occur is prevented by that the administrativeness occurs. sent19: if the fact that the dimming occurs and the adscriptness does not occur does not hold then the dimming does not occur. sent20: the payment is caused by the rhyming. sent21: that the negotiating sweatshop does not occur leads to that the conjugalness occurs and the negotiating academicianship occurs. sent22: that the cautery does not occur is triggered by that the conjugalness and the negotiating sweatshop happens. sent23: that the perseveration occurs prevents that the negotiating risklessness does not occur. sent24: the vociferating and the believing disyllable happens.
sent11 & sent10 & sent15 -> int1: the conjugalness happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the conjugalness and the negotiating sweatshop occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the cautery does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the cautery does not occur and the rhyming does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the dimness occurs.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the dimness and the non-gutsiness happens.; int6 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bunco does not occur hold.
$hypothesis$ = the bunco does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the gutsiness does not occur. sent2: that the negotiating amnion happens and the ambulatory happens is not true. sent3: the payment does not occur and the livableness does not occur if the negotiating academicianship occurs. sent4: the glaring happens. sent5: the fact that the bunco does not occur is not incorrect if the payment does not occur or the negotiating academicianship occurs or both. sent6: the dimming happens if the cautery does not occur and the rhyming does not occur. sent7: the negotiating diversion does not occur if the fact that the negotiating amnion occurs and the ambulatoriness happens is not correct. sent8: that the make-believe happens and/or the atheisticness occurs is brought about by that the negotiating diversion does not occur. sent9: the electromyography happens. sent10: the conjugalness occurs if the payment occurs. sent11: the payment happens and/or the negotiating academicianship occurs. sent12: the rhyming does not occur. sent13: both the non-perinealness and the non-hypophysealness happens. sent14: the negotiating sweatshop happens. sent15: that the negotiating academicianship occurs leads to the conjugalness. sent16: that the payment does not occur but the conjugalness happens is caused by that the negotiating sweatshop does not occur. sent17: if the dimness but not the gutsiness happens then the bunco occurs. sent18: that the negotiating sprue does not occur is prevented by that the administrativeness occurs. sent19: if the fact that the dimming occurs and the adscriptness does not occur does not hold then the dimming does not occur. sent20: the payment is caused by the rhyming. sent21: that the negotiating sweatshop does not occur leads to that the conjugalness occurs and the negotiating academicianship occurs. sent22: that the cautery does not occur is triggered by that the conjugalness and the negotiating sweatshop happens. sent23: that the perseveration occurs prevents that the negotiating risklessness does not occur. sent24: the vociferating and the believing disyllable happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 & sent15 -> int1: the conjugalness happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the conjugalness and the negotiating sweatshop occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the cautery does not occur.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the cautery does not occur and the rhyming does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the dimness occurs.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the dimness and the non-gutsiness happens.; int6 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__