the fact that the umbrellawort is dialectics and it is astomatal is incorrect.
sent1: if the sluice is a Holocene then it is not a Arawak and it does not dissimilate. sent2: if something does uplift reprieve then it is a crumb. sent3: if the undercut does not dissimilate and/or is not a dialectics it is not a dialectics. sent4: if the fact that the sluice is not a dialectics is right then the umbrellawort is astomatal. sent5: the sluice is not factual but it does uplift reprieve if the undercut is a Holocene. sent6: the umbrellawort is a Arawak. sent7: the sluice is a particulate. sent8: the undercut is not a kind of a dialectics. sent9: if something dissimilates it is a Holocene. sent10: the undercut is a kind of a Arawak. sent11: the umbrellawort is a dialectics and is astomatal if the sluice is not a kind of a dialectics. sent12: the undercut does dissimilate if it is a Arawak. sent13: if something that crumbs is particulate it is not dialectics.
sent12 & sent10 -> int1: the undercut does dissimilate.; sent9 -> int2: that the undercut is a Holocene hold if it does dissimilate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the undercut is a Holocene.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the sluice is not factual but it uplifts reprieve.; int4 -> int5: the sluice uplifts reprieve.; sent2 -> int6: the sluice does crumb if it uplifts reprieve.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sluice crumbs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the sluice is a crumb and it is a particulate.; sent13 -> int9: if the sluice is a crumb and a particulate it is not a kind of a dialectics.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the sluice is not a dialectics.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the umbrellawort is a kind of a dialectics that is astomatal does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the umbrellawort is dialectics and it is astomatal is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sluice is a Holocene then it is not a Arawak and it does not dissimilate. sent2: if something does uplift reprieve then it is a crumb. sent3: if the undercut does not dissimilate and/or is not a dialectics it is not a dialectics. sent4: if the fact that the sluice is not a dialectics is right then the umbrellawort is astomatal. sent5: the sluice is not factual but it does uplift reprieve if the undercut is a Holocene. sent6: the umbrellawort is a Arawak. sent7: the sluice is a particulate. sent8: the undercut is not a kind of a dialectics. sent9: if something dissimilates it is a Holocene. sent10: the undercut is a kind of a Arawak. sent11: the umbrellawort is a dialectics and is astomatal if the sluice is not a kind of a dialectics. sent12: the undercut does dissimilate if it is a Arawak. sent13: if something that crumbs is particulate it is not dialectics. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent10 -> int1: the undercut does dissimilate.; sent9 -> int2: that the undercut is a Holocene hold if it does dissimilate.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the undercut is a Holocene.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the sluice is not factual but it uplifts reprieve.; int4 -> int5: the sluice uplifts reprieve.; sent2 -> int6: the sluice does crumb if it uplifts reprieve.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sluice crumbs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the sluice is a crumb and it is a particulate.; sent13 -> int9: if the sluice is a crumb and a particulate it is not a kind of a dialectics.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the sluice is not a dialectics.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__