the fact that the cannelloni is not immunosuppressive if the tiercel is Kiplingesque is wrong.
sent1: if something is not Kiplingesque then that it is immunosuppressive and glazes NH is incorrect. sent2: the cannelloni is immunosuppressive if the tiercel is Kiplingesque. sent3: the tiercel is not Kiplingesque if the cannelloni is not a souse. sent4: the tiercel is non-Kiplingesque if that the cannelloni does souse and is not a Myrmecophagidae is not correct. sent5: the fact that the fact that the cannelloni is Kiplingesque thing that is not immunosuppressive is false if the cannelloni does souse is true. sent6: if the tiercel is Kiplingesque that it souses and it is not immunosuppressive is not right. sent7: the tiercel does not glaze Tocqueville. sent8: the fact that the cannelloni is both a Myrmecophagidae and not Kiplingesque is wrong if the fact that it is a kind of a souse is not false. sent9: if the tiercel is not a balloon and is not Kiplingesque the diaper is not Kiplingesque. sent10: if that the cannelloni is a kind of a souse but it is not a Myrmecophagidae is not right then the fact that the tiercel is Kiplingesque is right. sent11: if something is immunosuppressive then that it is a souse and not a Myrmecophagidae does not hold. sent12: the fact that the cowgirl is a kind of a thirteenth hold if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a jawan that is not a thirteenth is not right. sent13: there is nothing that is a jawan and not a thirteenth. sent14: the tiercel is not a kind of a Myrmecophagidae. sent15: if that something is immunosuppressive thing that glazes NH is false it is not immunosuppressive. sent16: the sandblaster is not a Myrmecophagidae. sent17: if something is Kiplingesque then the fact that the fact that it is a Myrmecophagidae and not immunosuppressive hold is not right.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the tiercel is Kiplingesque is true.; sent11 -> int1: the fact that the cannelloni does souse and is not a Myrmecophagidae is not right if it is immunosuppressive.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cannelloni is immunosuppressive.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the cannelloni is a souse and not a Myrmecophagidae is incorrect.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the tiercel is not Kiplingesque.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cannelloni is not immunosuppressive.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the diaper is not immunosuppressive.
sent15 -> int6: if that the diaper is immunosuppressive thing that does glaze NH does not hold it is not immunosuppressive.; sent1 -> int7: the fact that the diaper is immunosuppressive and glazes NH is not right if it is not Kiplingesque.; sent13 -> int8: the fact that the gesneriad is a jawan and is not a kind of a thirteenth is incorrect.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is a jawan and it is not a kind of a thirteenth is not right.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the cowgirl is a thirteenth.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a thirteenth.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cannelloni is not immunosuppressive if the tiercel is Kiplingesque is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not Kiplingesque then that it is immunosuppressive and glazes NH is incorrect. sent2: the cannelloni is immunosuppressive if the tiercel is Kiplingesque. sent3: the tiercel is not Kiplingesque if the cannelloni is not a souse. sent4: the tiercel is non-Kiplingesque if that the cannelloni does souse and is not a Myrmecophagidae is not correct. sent5: the fact that the fact that the cannelloni is Kiplingesque thing that is not immunosuppressive is false if the cannelloni does souse is true. sent6: if the tiercel is Kiplingesque that it souses and it is not immunosuppressive is not right. sent7: the tiercel does not glaze Tocqueville. sent8: the fact that the cannelloni is both a Myrmecophagidae and not Kiplingesque is wrong if the fact that it is a kind of a souse is not false. sent9: if the tiercel is not a balloon and is not Kiplingesque the diaper is not Kiplingesque. sent10: if that the cannelloni is a kind of a souse but it is not a Myrmecophagidae is not right then the fact that the tiercel is Kiplingesque is right. sent11: if something is immunosuppressive then that it is a souse and not a Myrmecophagidae does not hold. sent12: the fact that the cowgirl is a kind of a thirteenth hold if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a jawan that is not a thirteenth is not right. sent13: there is nothing that is a jawan and not a thirteenth. sent14: the tiercel is not a kind of a Myrmecophagidae. sent15: if that something is immunosuppressive thing that glazes NH is false it is not immunosuppressive. sent16: the sandblaster is not a Myrmecophagidae. sent17: if something is Kiplingesque then the fact that the fact that it is a Myrmecophagidae and not immunosuppressive hold is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the tiercel is Kiplingesque is true.; sent11 -> int1: the fact that the cannelloni does souse and is not a Myrmecophagidae is not right if it is immunosuppressive.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cannelloni is immunosuppressive.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the cannelloni is a souse and not a Myrmecophagidae is incorrect.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the tiercel is not Kiplingesque.; assump2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the cannelloni is not immunosuppressive.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__