the fact that the sprinkler is not skinless and does not lace correspondence is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that it is a negativity. sent2: something is a kind of a blare if it is interlinear. sent3: if either something does not detoxify or it is a loganberry or both it does not lace cupule. sent4: the anchorage is not a negativity if the msasa reckons budgerigar and/or it does not lace cupule. sent5: the sprinkler is not skinless and does not lace correspondence if there is something such that it is a negativity. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not lace cupule then the msasa either reckons budgerigar or does not lace cupule or both. sent7: if that the violet is a blare is not wrong the ascot is not anisotropic. sent8: that something does reckon budgerigar and is skinless is not true if it does not lace correspondence. sent9: the sprinkler is a negativity that is lowborn if the anchorage is not skinless. sent10: if the fact that something does reckon budgerigar and is skinless does not hold it is not skinless. sent11: if there are non-anisotropic things the silt does not detoxify and/or it is a loganberry. sent12: that the violet is interlinear is not wrong.
sent1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
something is lowborn.
sent10 -> int1: if that the anchorage does reckon budgerigar and it is skinless is wrong then it is not skinless.; sent8 -> int2: that that that the anchorage does reckon budgerigar and is skinless is false is right if the anchorage does not lace correspondence is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sprinkler is not skinless and does not lace correspondence is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is a negativity. sent2: something is a kind of a blare if it is interlinear. sent3: if either something does not detoxify or it is a loganberry or both it does not lace cupule. sent4: the anchorage is not a negativity if the msasa reckons budgerigar and/or it does not lace cupule. sent5: the sprinkler is not skinless and does not lace correspondence if there is something such that it is a negativity. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not lace cupule then the msasa either reckons budgerigar or does not lace cupule or both. sent7: if that the violet is a blare is not wrong the ascot is not anisotropic. sent8: that something does reckon budgerigar and is skinless is not true if it does not lace correspondence. sent9: the sprinkler is a negativity that is lowborn if the anchorage is not skinless. sent10: if the fact that something does reckon budgerigar and is skinless does not hold it is not skinless. sent11: if there are non-anisotropic things the silt does not detoxify and/or it is a loganberry. sent12: that the violet is interlinear is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__