the jag is not a Stavanger.
sent1: something does not trundle atheist if that it does trundle atheist and it is not expensive is false. sent2: something does trundle atheist if it is astringent. sent3: if the finnan trundles atheist then it does enlarge. sent4: The atheist trundles finnan. sent5: if something is not a kind of a sene either the vocabulary mends or it is not random or both. sent6: something is eradicable but it does not rerun croton. sent7: the croton is offing. sent8: there is something such that it is allographic and it trundles Oblation. sent9: the finnan is not a mend if that the croton is a kind of a sene that is random is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it is a steward. sent11: something is not a superscript or is not a kind of a avulsion or both if it is astringent. sent12: if the fact that the vocabulary is a mend is not incorrect the jag is not a Stavanger. sent13: if there is something such that it is eradicable and it reruns croton then the vocabulary is not random. sent14: if something enlarges then it is an astringent. sent15: something is a superscript if it is astringent. sent16: the fact that the croton is a kind of a sene that is random is not right if the vocabulary is not random. sent17: if the urceole is a kind of a avulsion then the jag is a Stavanger. sent18: if there exists something such that it is eradicable and it does not rerun croton then the vocabulary is nonrandom. sent19: there is something such that it does not rerun croton. sent20: that the urceole is a avulsion is not false if the finnan does not mend but it is a kind of a superscript. sent21: the finnan trundles atheist. sent22: the Carthusian does not trundle atheist if there is something such that that it trundle atheist and it is not random is wrong. sent23: if either something is not a superscript or it is not a kind of a avulsion or both that it is not a sene hold. sent24: the fact that something does trundle atheist and is not expensive is not right if that it is offing hold.
sent6 & sent18 -> int1: the vocabulary is not random.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the croton is a kind of a sene that is random is not correct.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the finnan is not a mend.; sent15 -> int4: the finnan is a kind of a superscript if it is an astringent.; sent14 -> int5: if the finnan does enlarge then it is a kind of an astringent.; sent3 & sent21 -> int6: the finnan enlarges.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the finnan is astringent.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the finnan is a superscript.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the finnan is both not a mend and a superscript.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the urceole is a kind of a avulsion.; int10 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the Carthusian does not trundle atheist.
$hypothesis$ = the jag is not a Stavanger. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not trundle atheist if that it does trundle atheist and it is not expensive is false. sent2: something does trundle atheist if it is astringent. sent3: if the finnan trundles atheist then it does enlarge. sent4: The atheist trundles finnan. sent5: if something is not a kind of a sene either the vocabulary mends or it is not random or both. sent6: something is eradicable but it does not rerun croton. sent7: the croton is offing. sent8: there is something such that it is allographic and it trundles Oblation. sent9: the finnan is not a mend if that the croton is a kind of a sene that is random is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it is a steward. sent11: something is not a superscript or is not a kind of a avulsion or both if it is astringent. sent12: if the fact that the vocabulary is a mend is not incorrect the jag is not a Stavanger. sent13: if there is something such that it is eradicable and it reruns croton then the vocabulary is not random. sent14: if something enlarges then it is an astringent. sent15: something is a superscript if it is astringent. sent16: the fact that the croton is a kind of a sene that is random is not right if the vocabulary is not random. sent17: if the urceole is a kind of a avulsion then the jag is a Stavanger. sent18: if there exists something such that it is eradicable and it does not rerun croton then the vocabulary is nonrandom. sent19: there is something such that it does not rerun croton. sent20: that the urceole is a avulsion is not false if the finnan does not mend but it is a kind of a superscript. sent21: the finnan trundles atheist. sent22: the Carthusian does not trundle atheist if there is something such that that it trundle atheist and it is not random is wrong. sent23: if either something is not a superscript or it is not a kind of a avulsion or both that it is not a sene hold. sent24: the fact that something does trundle atheist and is not expensive is not right if that it is offing hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent18 -> int1: the vocabulary is not random.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: that the croton is a kind of a sene that is random is not correct.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the finnan is not a mend.; sent15 -> int4: the finnan is a kind of a superscript if it is an astringent.; sent14 -> int5: if the finnan does enlarge then it is a kind of an astringent.; sent3 & sent21 -> int6: the finnan enlarges.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the finnan is astringent.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the finnan is a superscript.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the finnan is both not a mend and a superscript.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the urceole is a kind of a avulsion.; int10 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__