there exists something such that if the fact that it is psychoanalytical is right then the fact that it is not a kind of a neutral and/or does not chock pizzicato does not hold.
sent1: the fact that something is not a brown and/or it is not secretarial is wrong if it is a cornpone. sent2: that the fact that the dicamptodon is a neutral or it does not chock pizzicato or both is false hold if it is psychoanalytical. sent3: there is something such that if that it is psychoanalytical is correct it is not a neutral and/or it does not chock pizzicato. sent4: there is something such that if it is repeatable the fact that it is not a condyle or is a Esox or both does not hold. sent5: if the dicamptodon is psychoanalytical it is not neutral or it does not chock pizzicato or both. sent6: there exists something such that if it briefs hymn then the fact that either it is consolable or it is not a forehand or both does not hold. sent7: the fact that the dicamptodon is non-neutral or it does not chock pizzicato or both is wrong if it is psychoanalytical. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a gammon then it either does not exist or does not finedraw hindgut or both. sent9: there is something such that if it is Angolan the fact that it either does not brief psychobabble or does not menstruate or both does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a fire that either it is not repeatable or it does not finedraw Primus or both does not hold. sent11: if that the dicamptodon is psychoanalytical is correct it chocks pizzicato. sent12: there is something such that if it is psychoanalytical then that it either is a neutral or does not chock pizzicato or both is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if it is psychoanalytical then it chocks pizzicato. sent14: there exists something such that if it is psychoanalytical then that it is not a kind of a neutral or it does chock pizzicato or both is wrong. sent15: the fact that something is either not naturistic or not oleaceous or both is incorrect if it is psychoanalytical. sent16: there exists something such that if it is psychoanalytical it is not non-neutral.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
that either the hindgut is not naturistic or it is not oleaceous or both is not right if it is psychoanalytical.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is psychoanalytical is right then the fact that it is not a kind of a neutral and/or does not chock pizzicato does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not a brown and/or it is not secretarial is wrong if it is a cornpone. sent2: that the fact that the dicamptodon is a neutral or it does not chock pizzicato or both is false hold if it is psychoanalytical. sent3: there is something such that if that it is psychoanalytical is correct it is not a neutral and/or it does not chock pizzicato. sent4: there is something such that if it is repeatable the fact that it is not a condyle or is a Esox or both does not hold. sent5: if the dicamptodon is psychoanalytical it is not neutral or it does not chock pizzicato or both. sent6: there exists something such that if it briefs hymn then the fact that either it is consolable or it is not a forehand or both does not hold. sent7: the fact that the dicamptodon is non-neutral or it does not chock pizzicato or both is wrong if it is psychoanalytical. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a gammon then it either does not exist or does not finedraw hindgut or both. sent9: there is something such that if it is Angolan the fact that it either does not brief psychobabble or does not menstruate or both does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a fire that either it is not repeatable or it does not finedraw Primus or both does not hold. sent11: if that the dicamptodon is psychoanalytical is correct it chocks pizzicato. sent12: there is something such that if it is psychoanalytical then that it either is a neutral or does not chock pizzicato or both is incorrect. sent13: there is something such that if it is psychoanalytical then it chocks pizzicato. sent14: there exists something such that if it is psychoanalytical then that it is not a kind of a neutral or it does chock pizzicato or both is wrong. sent15: the fact that something is either not naturistic or not oleaceous or both is incorrect if it is psychoanalytical. sent16: there exists something such that if it is psychoanalytical it is not non-neutral. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__