that that the labor does not occur yields that the sandblasting occurs is not right.
sent1: that the revelation happens and the ridiculing epilogue occurs does not hold if the labor occurs. sent2: that if the ridiculing epilogue does not occur the seriousness does not occur is correct. sent3: if the labor does not occur then that both the revelation and the ridiculing epilogue happens does not hold. sent4: if that the ridiculing Brancusi happens and the cryocautery occurs is not true then that the incorporation does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the confining leotard does not occur. sent6: the seriousness does not occur if the fact that both the revelation and the ridiculing epilogue happens is false. sent7: not the sandblast but the treat happens if the fractionalness happens. sent8: if the contemning welcoming does not occur then the fact that the portraiture happens is true. sent9: if the adjectivalness does not occur that the worldliness and the fractionalness happens is true. sent10: the laundering occurs. sent11: that the sandblast does not occur is prevented by that the seriousness does not occur. sent12: the adjectivalness does not occur if the fact that the confining lightbulb does not occur and the contemning belay does not occur does not hold. sent13: the laboring prevents that the ridiculing allergen does not occur. sent14: that the contemning spokesman does not occur yields that the Romany happens. sent15: if the fact that the labor happens is not wrong the sandblasting happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the laboring does not occur is not false.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the revelation occurs and the ridiculing epilogue happens is not true.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the seriousness does not occur.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the sandblast occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the ridiculing allergen occurs is correct.
$hypothesis$ = that that the labor does not occur yields that the sandblasting occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the revelation happens and the ridiculing epilogue occurs does not hold if the labor occurs. sent2: that if the ridiculing epilogue does not occur the seriousness does not occur is correct. sent3: if the labor does not occur then that both the revelation and the ridiculing epilogue happens does not hold. sent4: if that the ridiculing Brancusi happens and the cryocautery occurs is not true then that the incorporation does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the confining leotard does not occur. sent6: the seriousness does not occur if the fact that both the revelation and the ridiculing epilogue happens is false. sent7: not the sandblast but the treat happens if the fractionalness happens. sent8: if the contemning welcoming does not occur then the fact that the portraiture happens is true. sent9: if the adjectivalness does not occur that the worldliness and the fractionalness happens is true. sent10: the laundering occurs. sent11: that the sandblast does not occur is prevented by that the seriousness does not occur. sent12: the adjectivalness does not occur if the fact that the confining lightbulb does not occur and the contemning belay does not occur does not hold. sent13: the laboring prevents that the ridiculing allergen does not occur. sent14: that the contemning spokesman does not occur yields that the Romany happens. sent15: if the fact that the labor happens is not wrong the sandblasting happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the laboring does not occur is not false.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the revelation occurs and the ridiculing epilogue happens is not true.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the seriousness does not occur.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the sandblast occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__