the calyculateness does not occur.
sent1: that the Peloponnesianness happens hold. sent2: the sit-down happens and the assignment does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the improperness does not occur but the grilling occurs is right is wrong the grilling does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the discriminateness does not occur and the stretching does not occur is false then the summeriness happens. sent5: if the fact that the quitclaim does not occur is right then that the propagation but not the walking jogging occurs is false. sent6: the fact that the discriminating does not occur and the stretching does not occur is not true if the firebombing Namibia happens. sent7: that both the properness and the grill happens does not hold if the walking jogging happens. sent8: that both the sit-down and the assignment happens is incorrect if the unserviceableness does not occur. sent9: if the unserviceableness does not occur then the fact that the sit-down occurs but the assignment does not occur does not hold. sent10: that both the pavane and the denudation happens is incorrect. sent11: that the muffling does not occur but the supraorbitalness happens is caused by that the grilling does not occur. sent12: if the supererogation and/or the summeriness occurs then that the heaving does not occur hold. sent13: if the heaving happens then the calyculateness happens. sent14: both the firebombing Namibia and the non-herbivorousness occurs if that the muffling does not occur is true. sent15: if the fact that the propagation occurs but the walking jogging does not occur does not hold the walking jogging happens. sent16: that the unserviceableness happens prevents that the heaves does not occur. sent17: the audiometry does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unserviceableness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the sit-down occurs but the assignment does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the unserviceableness occurs.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the heaving happens.; int4 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the calyculateness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the calyculateness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Peloponnesianness happens hold. sent2: the sit-down happens and the assignment does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the fact that the improperness does not occur but the grilling occurs is right is wrong the grilling does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the discriminateness does not occur and the stretching does not occur is false then the summeriness happens. sent5: if the fact that the quitclaim does not occur is right then that the propagation but not the walking jogging occurs is false. sent6: the fact that the discriminating does not occur and the stretching does not occur is not true if the firebombing Namibia happens. sent7: that both the properness and the grill happens does not hold if the walking jogging happens. sent8: that both the sit-down and the assignment happens is incorrect if the unserviceableness does not occur. sent9: if the unserviceableness does not occur then the fact that the sit-down occurs but the assignment does not occur does not hold. sent10: that both the pavane and the denudation happens is incorrect. sent11: that the muffling does not occur but the supraorbitalness happens is caused by that the grilling does not occur. sent12: if the supererogation and/or the summeriness occurs then that the heaving does not occur hold. sent13: if the heaving happens then the calyculateness happens. sent14: both the firebombing Namibia and the non-herbivorousness occurs if that the muffling does not occur is true. sent15: if the fact that the propagation occurs but the walking jogging does not occur does not hold the walking jogging happens. sent16: that the unserviceableness happens prevents that the heaves does not occur. sent17: the audiometry does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unserviceableness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the sit-down occurs but the assignment does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the unserviceableness occurs.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the heaving happens.; int4 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__