there exists something such that if it is not postmenopausal then the fact that it does not run and is ducal is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the tomentum ravens hold and it is ducal is not right if it is not a put. sent2: if something is postmenopausal then that it does not run and is ducal is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is not postmenopausal that it does run and it is ducal is wrong. sent4: the fact that something does not raven quincentennial and does raven greaves is not correct if it aurifies floorwalker. sent5: the fact that the Crown is a run and it is ducal is not true if it is not postmenopausal. sent6: there is something such that if it is not papal then that it is a kind of a narthex and it is aeronautical does not hold. sent7: if the Crown does not run that it is not a schizophrenic and it is jurisprudential is not correct. sent8: something does not liquefy tomentum and is a kind of a benevolence if the fact that it is not unfrozen is true. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it is not unthinkable then that it is a Macrouridae and it ravens Shockley is not right is not false. sent10: if the Crown is not postmenopausal then it is not a run and it is ducal. sent11: the fact that something is an acquirer and a pleurisy is false if it does not fresco. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it liquefies thiopental is not correct the fact that it is asynchronous and does raven fertilization is incorrect. sent13: if something is not postmenopausal the fact that it is not a run but ducal does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a ovipositor it is not a kind of a Sinology and it is a necessity. sent15: that the hater is not a run but pentavalent is not true if it is not a enologist.
sent13 -> int1: that the Crown is not a run but ducal is not right if it is not postmenopausal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not postmenopausal then the fact that it does not run and is ducal is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the tomentum ravens hold and it is ducal is not right if it is not a put. sent2: if something is postmenopausal then that it does not run and is ducal is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it is not postmenopausal that it does run and it is ducal is wrong. sent4: the fact that something does not raven quincentennial and does raven greaves is not correct if it aurifies floorwalker. sent5: the fact that the Crown is a run and it is ducal is not true if it is not postmenopausal. sent6: there is something such that if it is not papal then that it is a kind of a narthex and it is aeronautical does not hold. sent7: if the Crown does not run that it is not a schizophrenic and it is jurisprudential is not correct. sent8: something does not liquefy tomentum and is a kind of a benevolence if the fact that it is not unfrozen is true. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it is not unthinkable then that it is a Macrouridae and it ravens Shockley is not right is not false. sent10: if the Crown is not postmenopausal then it is not a run and it is ducal. sent11: the fact that something is an acquirer and a pleurisy is false if it does not fresco. sent12: there exists something such that if the fact that it liquefies thiopental is not correct the fact that it is asynchronous and does raven fertilization is incorrect. sent13: if something is not postmenopausal the fact that it is not a run but ducal does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a ovipositor it is not a kind of a Sinology and it is a necessity. sent15: that the hater is not a run but pentavalent is not true if it is not a enologist. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: that the Crown is not a run but ducal is not right if it is not postmenopausal.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__