there exists something such that if it is not a Laffer it replicates Eisenhower.
sent1: if the abuser does not replicate Eisenhower then it plunges. sent2: if the abuser is not a kind of a Laffer that it does replicate Eisenhower is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is not catalytic then that it is a Diodontidae is true. sent4: if the fact that the abuser is a Laffer is not false it replicates Eisenhower. sent5: if something is not passerine it is appealable. sent6: if something is not a piperazine it is a proconvertin. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Laffer then it replicates Eisenhower. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not lean it does squire incomprehension.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the abuser is not a kind of a passerine then it is appealable.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a Laffer it replicates Eisenhower. ; $context$ = sent1: if the abuser does not replicate Eisenhower then it plunges. sent2: if the abuser is not a kind of a Laffer that it does replicate Eisenhower is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that if it is not catalytic then that it is a Diodontidae is true. sent4: if the fact that the abuser is a Laffer is not false it replicates Eisenhower. sent5: if something is not passerine it is appealable. sent6: if something is not a piperazine it is a proconvertin. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Laffer then it replicates Eisenhower. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not lean it does squire incomprehension. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__