the fact that the avarice does not occur but the narrating bugle occurs is not wrong.
sent1: the fact that the avarice does not occur and the narrating bugle happens does not hold if the rich does not occur. sent2: if the basalness does not occur that the depriving adoptee but not the step occurs is false. sent3: that the determination does not occur and the glabellarness occurs is triggered by the stabilizing. sent4: that not the determination but the glabellarness happens prevents that the breakaway occurs. sent5: that the breakaway does not occur results in that the legislativeness occurs. sent6: that the legislativeness happens prevents that the lutealness occurs. sent7: the fact that the neurotoxicness occurs and the self-denial happens is not true. sent8: if the subjecting metonymy occurs then the stabilizing occurs. sent9: the fact that the subjecting downtime but not the subjecting beef occurs does not hold if that the reconsideration does not occur is right. sent10: the passionlessness occurs. sent11: if the depriving adoptee does not occur that the dispersion and the non-elfinness happens is incorrect. sent12: if the narrating bugle does not occur the fact that the mull does not occur is not false. sent13: both the non-Greekness and the non-basalness occurs if the lutealness does not occur. sent14: the drudgery and the passionlessness occurs if the uppercut does not occur. sent15: the passionlessness does not occur if the drudgery does not occur. sent16: if that the subjecting downtime but not the subjecting beef happens is false then the self-denial occurs. sent17: the fact that the non-oleophilicness and the non-philatelicness occurs is not true if the self-denial happens. sent18: if that both the dispersion and the non-elfinness happens is not correct the reconsideration does not occur. sent19: if the mulling does not occur then that the drudgery and the rich occurs is incorrect. sent20: if the fact that the oleophilicness does not occur and the philatelicness does not occur is not correct then the uppercut does not occur. sent21: the mulling does not occur if the fact that the avarice does not occur and the narrating bugle occurs is not true. sent22: that the narrating bugle happens is true. sent23: if the fact that the depriving adoptee happens but the step does not occur is not true then the depriving adoptee does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the avarice does not occur and the narrating bugle occurs does not hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the mulling does not occur.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the drudgery and the rich occurs is wrong.;
the fact that not the avarice but the narrating bugle occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the avarice does not occur but the narrating bugle occurs is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the avarice does not occur and the narrating bugle happens does not hold if the rich does not occur. sent2: if the basalness does not occur that the depriving adoptee but not the step occurs is false. sent3: that the determination does not occur and the glabellarness occurs is triggered by the stabilizing. sent4: that not the determination but the glabellarness happens prevents that the breakaway occurs. sent5: that the breakaway does not occur results in that the legislativeness occurs. sent6: that the legislativeness happens prevents that the lutealness occurs. sent7: the fact that the neurotoxicness occurs and the self-denial happens is not true. sent8: if the subjecting metonymy occurs then the stabilizing occurs. sent9: the fact that the subjecting downtime but not the subjecting beef occurs does not hold if that the reconsideration does not occur is right. sent10: the passionlessness occurs. sent11: if the depriving adoptee does not occur that the dispersion and the non-elfinness happens is incorrect. sent12: if the narrating bugle does not occur the fact that the mull does not occur is not false. sent13: both the non-Greekness and the non-basalness occurs if the lutealness does not occur. sent14: the drudgery and the passionlessness occurs if the uppercut does not occur. sent15: the passionlessness does not occur if the drudgery does not occur. sent16: if that the subjecting downtime but not the subjecting beef happens is false then the self-denial occurs. sent17: the fact that the non-oleophilicness and the non-philatelicness occurs is not true if the self-denial happens. sent18: if that both the dispersion and the non-elfinness happens is not correct the reconsideration does not occur. sent19: if the mulling does not occur then that the drudgery and the rich occurs is incorrect. sent20: if the fact that the oleophilicness does not occur and the philatelicness does not occur is not correct then the uppercut does not occur. sent21: the mulling does not occur if the fact that the avarice does not occur and the narrating bugle occurs is not true. sent22: that the narrating bugle happens is true. sent23: if the fact that the depriving adoptee happens but the step does not occur is not true then the depriving adoptee does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the avarice does not occur and the narrating bugle occurs does not hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the mulling does not occur.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the drudgery and the rich occurs is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__