that the oilman is a kind of a Kosovo that does not guard megahertz is false.
sent1: the oilman is a Kosovo but it does not guard megahertz if that the culdoscope is unambitious hold. sent2: the culdoscope guards pin. sent3: the agnostic is Cameroonian. sent4: if the oilman is a goalkeeper it idealizes Zanthoxylum and is not a kind of a Cameroonian. sent5: the oilman is a goalkeeper if it is eremitic thing that is not illative. sent6: if something coheres then that it is a kind of a Kosovo and it guards megahertz is not true. sent7: if something does not cohere the Wesleyan idealizes Zanthoxylum and/or is not infantile. sent8: if the avadavat is a kind of a goalkeeper then the fact that it does not idealize Euphagus is not incorrect. sent9: if the oilman is not eremitic and not illative the fact that it is a goalkeeper is right. sent10: something does cohere if it does idealize Zanthoxylum. sent11: the hydromorphone is a kind of a goalkeeper if the agnostic is Cameroonian. sent12: that the fact that something is a kind of a Kosovo that does not guard megahertz is not wrong is wrong if it does cohere. sent13: the culdoscope idealizes Wesleyan and does guard pin. sent14: if the oilman is a kind of non-eremitic thing that is illative that it is a goalkeeper is not incorrect. sent15: if the culdoscope does not scull the oilman is not unambitious. sent16: something that is not a sculling but eremitic is branchiate. sent17: something is not illative if it is a goalkeeper and it idealizes Zanthoxylum. sent18: the oilman is not eremitic and is not illative if that it is not unambitious is right. sent19: the culdoscope is not a kind of a sculling if it idealizes Wesleyan and guards pin. sent20: a sculling is unambitious. sent21: the caravan does not cohere. sent22: the radiography is not a goalkeeper. sent23: the culdoscope is a sculling if the hydromorphone is a sculling but not eremitic.
sent19 & sent13 -> int1: the culdoscope is not a sculling.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the oilman is not unambitious.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the oilman is not eremitic and not illative.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the oilman is a goalkeeper.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the oilman idealizes Zanthoxylum but it is not a kind of a Cameroonian.; int5 -> int6: the oilman does idealize Zanthoxylum.; sent10 -> int7: the oilman coheres if it does idealize Zanthoxylum.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the oilman coheres.; sent12 -> int9: the fact that the oilman is a kind of a Kosovo and does not guard megahertz is not correct if it coheres.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the radiography is branchiate and it is illative.
sent16 -> int10: the fact that the radiography is branchiate is right if it is not a sculling and it is eremitic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the oilman is a kind of a Kosovo that does not guard megahertz is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the oilman is a Kosovo but it does not guard megahertz if that the culdoscope is unambitious hold. sent2: the culdoscope guards pin. sent3: the agnostic is Cameroonian. sent4: if the oilman is a goalkeeper it idealizes Zanthoxylum and is not a kind of a Cameroonian. sent5: the oilman is a goalkeeper if it is eremitic thing that is not illative. sent6: if something coheres then that it is a kind of a Kosovo and it guards megahertz is not true. sent7: if something does not cohere the Wesleyan idealizes Zanthoxylum and/or is not infantile. sent8: if the avadavat is a kind of a goalkeeper then the fact that it does not idealize Euphagus is not incorrect. sent9: if the oilman is not eremitic and not illative the fact that it is a goalkeeper is right. sent10: something does cohere if it does idealize Zanthoxylum. sent11: the hydromorphone is a kind of a goalkeeper if the agnostic is Cameroonian. sent12: that the fact that something is a kind of a Kosovo that does not guard megahertz is not wrong is wrong if it does cohere. sent13: the culdoscope idealizes Wesleyan and does guard pin. sent14: if the oilman is a kind of non-eremitic thing that is illative that it is a goalkeeper is not incorrect. sent15: if the culdoscope does not scull the oilman is not unambitious. sent16: something that is not a sculling but eremitic is branchiate. sent17: something is not illative if it is a goalkeeper and it idealizes Zanthoxylum. sent18: the oilman is not eremitic and is not illative if that it is not unambitious is right. sent19: the culdoscope is not a kind of a sculling if it idealizes Wesleyan and guards pin. sent20: a sculling is unambitious. sent21: the caravan does not cohere. sent22: the radiography is not a goalkeeper. sent23: the culdoscope is a sculling if the hydromorphone is a sculling but not eremitic. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent13 -> int1: the culdoscope is not a sculling.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the oilman is not unambitious.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the oilman is not eremitic and not illative.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the oilman is a goalkeeper.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the oilman idealizes Zanthoxylum but it is not a kind of a Cameroonian.; int5 -> int6: the oilman does idealize Zanthoxylum.; sent10 -> int7: the oilman coheres if it does idealize Zanthoxylum.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the oilman coheres.; sent12 -> int9: the fact that the oilman is a kind of a Kosovo and does not guard megahertz is not correct if it coheres.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__