the auditorium is not purgatorial.
sent1: if the loganberry is aeromedical but it is not a tomtit the prefecture is intuitionist. sent2: the fact that if that the loganberry is not the reprieve is not false the loganberry is non-aeromedical is correct. sent3: the loganberry is not a kind of a reprieve if there is something such that it is not a kind of a vitrification. sent4: that either something is not a vitrification or it reprieves or both is correct. sent5: something does not reprieve if it is non-stereoscopic. sent6: if the auditorium is not stereoscopic and is not Zolaesque then it denaturalizes waggery. sent7: the prefecture is a kind of a hygrometer that is purgatorial. sent8: something is not aeromedical and it is not a tomtit if it does not reprieve. sent9: the loganberry is not aeromedical. sent10: that the loganberry is intuitionist if the prefecture is aeromedical and is not a tomtit hold. sent11: something is not a vitrification or it does not reprieve or both. sent12: something is not a Bellow if it is not a reprieve. sent13: the fact that the loganberry is not a reprieve if something is not a vitrification or it is not a reprieve or both is correct. sent14: the fact that the prefecture is a kind of Zolaesque thing that does not denaturalize waggery does not hold if it is purgatorial. sent15: if something is intuitionist then it is not a reprieve. sent16: if something denaturalizes waggery it is purgatorial. sent17: the prefecture is intuitionist if the loganberry is both not aeromedical and not a tomtit. sent18: if something is intuitionist the auditorium is not stereoscopic and is not Zolaesque. sent19: if the auditorium is stereoscopic but it is not Zolaesque then it denaturalizes waggery. sent20: the fact that either something is a kind of a vitrification or it is not a reprieve or both hold. sent21: something is intuitionist and/or it is not stereoscopic if it is not Zolaesque.
sent8 -> int1: the loganberry is both not aeromedical and not a tomtit if it is not a reprieve.; sent11 & sent13 -> int2: the loganberry is not a reprieve.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the loganberry is non-aeromedical and it is not a tomtit.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the prefecture is intuitionist.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is intuitionist.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the auditorium is non-stereoscopic thing that is not Zolaesque.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the auditorium does denaturalize waggery.; sent16 -> int8: the auditorium is purgatorial if it does denaturalize waggery.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the auditorium is not a Bellow.
sent12 -> int9: the auditorium is not a Bellow if it does not reprieve.; sent21 -> int10: if the auditorium is not Zolaesque then it either is intuitionist or is not stereoscopic or both.; sent7 -> int11: the prefecture is purgatorial.; sent14 & int11 -> int12: that the prefecture is Zolaesque but it does not denaturalize waggery is false.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is Zolaesque and does not denaturalize waggery does not hold.; sent15 -> int14: if the auditorium is intuitionist it does not reprieve.; sent5 -> int15: if the auditorium is not stereoscopic it is not a reprieve.;
$hypothesis$ = the auditorium is not purgatorial. ; $context$ = sent1: if the loganberry is aeromedical but it is not a tomtit the prefecture is intuitionist. sent2: the fact that if that the loganberry is not the reprieve is not false the loganberry is non-aeromedical is correct. sent3: the loganberry is not a kind of a reprieve if there is something such that it is not a kind of a vitrification. sent4: that either something is not a vitrification or it reprieves or both is correct. sent5: something does not reprieve if it is non-stereoscopic. sent6: if the auditorium is not stereoscopic and is not Zolaesque then it denaturalizes waggery. sent7: the prefecture is a kind of a hygrometer that is purgatorial. sent8: something is not aeromedical and it is not a tomtit if it does not reprieve. sent9: the loganberry is not aeromedical. sent10: that the loganberry is intuitionist if the prefecture is aeromedical and is not a tomtit hold. sent11: something is not a vitrification or it does not reprieve or both. sent12: something is not a Bellow if it is not a reprieve. sent13: the fact that the loganberry is not a reprieve if something is not a vitrification or it is not a reprieve or both is correct. sent14: the fact that the prefecture is a kind of Zolaesque thing that does not denaturalize waggery does not hold if it is purgatorial. sent15: if something is intuitionist then it is not a reprieve. sent16: if something denaturalizes waggery it is purgatorial. sent17: the prefecture is intuitionist if the loganberry is both not aeromedical and not a tomtit. sent18: if something is intuitionist the auditorium is not stereoscopic and is not Zolaesque. sent19: if the auditorium is stereoscopic but it is not Zolaesque then it denaturalizes waggery. sent20: the fact that either something is a kind of a vitrification or it is not a reprieve or both hold. sent21: something is intuitionist and/or it is not stereoscopic if it is not Zolaesque. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the loganberry is both not aeromedical and not a tomtit if it is not a reprieve.; sent11 & sent13 -> int2: the loganberry is not a reprieve.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the loganberry is non-aeromedical and it is not a tomtit.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the prefecture is intuitionist.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is intuitionist.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the auditorium is non-stereoscopic thing that is not Zolaesque.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the auditorium does denaturalize waggery.; sent16 -> int8: the auditorium is purgatorial if it does denaturalize waggery.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__