the hairdo does not conceive.
sent1: the Nebraskan is austenitic. sent2: the bone is not Czech. sent3: if that the bone is not a kind of a Czech is not incorrect it is a litigiousness. sent4: if something is austenitic the fact that the duckpin is both not austenitic and a tubeless is wrong. sent5: if something is intelligent then it interposes. sent6: the fact that the duckpin is not intramuscular hold. sent7: the bone does not reflect if the actomyosin is not a Osaka. sent8: something is a lifer but it is not a kind of a transsexual. sent9: the huck is not a kind of a litigiousness if that the bone is not a litigiousness and does conceive is not true. sent10: the fact that the bone is not a kind of a litigiousness and does conceive does not hold if there is something such that it is Czech. sent11: that the hairdo is not a Osaka and does not reflect is not right if the actomyosin does not overturn Lamaist. sent12: the actomyosin does not interpose if the duckpin interpose but it is not intramuscular. sent13: the fact that the hairdo is not a Czech is not false. sent14: something that does not reflect is both a Czech and not a litigiousness. sent15: if something is not intelligent and does interpose then the actomyosin does not overturn Lamaist. sent16: if there is something such that it is both a lifer and not a transsexual the fact that the Lamaist does not overturn lobed hold. sent17: something is not intramuscular if that it is both not austenitic and not tubed is not correct. sent18: the hairdo does conceive if the fact that the bone is a litigiousness hold. sent19: if that something is intelligent and/or it does not overturn lobed is not wrong then the duckpin is intelligent. sent20: something that does not interpose either is not a kind of a Osaka or does not overturn Lamaist or both.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the bone is a litigiousness.; sent18 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the huck is not a kind of a litigiousness.
$hypothesis$ = the hairdo does not conceive. ; $context$ = sent1: the Nebraskan is austenitic. sent2: the bone is not Czech. sent3: if that the bone is not a kind of a Czech is not incorrect it is a litigiousness. sent4: if something is austenitic the fact that the duckpin is both not austenitic and a tubeless is wrong. sent5: if something is intelligent then it interposes. sent6: the fact that the duckpin is not intramuscular hold. sent7: the bone does not reflect if the actomyosin is not a Osaka. sent8: something is a lifer but it is not a kind of a transsexual. sent9: the huck is not a kind of a litigiousness if that the bone is not a litigiousness and does conceive is not true. sent10: the fact that the bone is not a kind of a litigiousness and does conceive does not hold if there is something such that it is Czech. sent11: that the hairdo is not a Osaka and does not reflect is not right if the actomyosin does not overturn Lamaist. sent12: the actomyosin does not interpose if the duckpin interpose but it is not intramuscular. sent13: the fact that the hairdo is not a Czech is not false. sent14: something that does not reflect is both a Czech and not a litigiousness. sent15: if something is not intelligent and does interpose then the actomyosin does not overturn Lamaist. sent16: if there is something such that it is both a lifer and not a transsexual the fact that the Lamaist does not overturn lobed hold. sent17: something is not intramuscular if that it is both not austenitic and not tubed is not correct. sent18: the hairdo does conceive if the fact that the bone is a litigiousness hold. sent19: if that something is intelligent and/or it does not overturn lobed is not wrong then the duckpin is intelligent. sent20: something that does not interpose either is not a kind of a Osaka or does not overturn Lamaist or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the bone is a litigiousness.; sent18 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__