the scours is not a preexistence.
sent1: if that something is a tankard or it is not a Simpson or both is not true it is not a preexistence. sent2: the neutralist is a preexistence if the haloform is a Simpson. sent3: the neutralist is not a kind of a preexistence. sent4: if there is something such that it is not a preexistence the haloform is inadequate. sent5: if the fumewort does repaint the fact that the scours is a tankard and/or not a Simpson is not correct. sent6: the scours is a kind of a preexistence and is not inadequate if the haloform is a preexistence. sent7: if something that is not inadequate is chirpy then it repaints. sent8: the neutralist is a Simpson if the fumewort is a kind of a tankard. sent9: if the haloform is chirpy and it is atonic then the fact that the fumewort is inadequate is not right. sent10: the haloform is a preexistence if the neutralist is a Simpson. sent11: the neutralist is a whoop if the breakax is a Simpson. sent12: that the scours does fracture Freud is right. sent13: the whistle-blower is a Simpson. sent14: everything does whoop or it is microsomal or both. sent15: everything is a whoop and/or it is not a tankard. sent16: something is voltaic but it is not a Loiseleuria if it is not a kind of a tankard. sent17: if there exists something such that it does whoop and/or it is not microsomal the fact that the fumewort is a tankard is right. sent18: if that the fumewort is a preexistence is not incorrect then the neutralist is not a tankard but it is a kind of a Simpson. sent19: the haloform is microsomal. sent20: something does repaint and it is a preexistence if it is not inadequate. sent21: everything whoops and/or it is not microsomal. sent22: if there exists something such that it is not microsomal then the fumewort is a tankard.
sent21 -> int1: the breakax is a whoop and/or not microsomal.; int1 -> int2: something is a whoop and/or it is not microsomal.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fumewort is a tankard.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the neutralist is a Simpson.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the haloform is a kind of a preexistence is not false.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the scours is a kind of a preexistence but it is not inadequate.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the scours is not a kind of a preexistence.
sent1 -> int7: if the fact that the scours is a tankard and/or it is not a kind of a Simpson does not hold then it is not a kind of a preexistence.; sent7 -> int8: the fumewort repaints if it is a kind of adequate thing that is chirpy.;
$hypothesis$ = the scours is not a preexistence. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a tankard or it is not a Simpson or both is not true it is not a preexistence. sent2: the neutralist is a preexistence if the haloform is a Simpson. sent3: the neutralist is not a kind of a preexistence. sent4: if there is something such that it is not a preexistence the haloform is inadequate. sent5: if the fumewort does repaint the fact that the scours is a tankard and/or not a Simpson is not correct. sent6: the scours is a kind of a preexistence and is not inadequate if the haloform is a preexistence. sent7: if something that is not inadequate is chirpy then it repaints. sent8: the neutralist is a Simpson if the fumewort is a kind of a tankard. sent9: if the haloform is chirpy and it is atonic then the fact that the fumewort is inadequate is not right. sent10: the haloform is a preexistence if the neutralist is a Simpson. sent11: the neutralist is a whoop if the breakax is a Simpson. sent12: that the scours does fracture Freud is right. sent13: the whistle-blower is a Simpson. sent14: everything does whoop or it is microsomal or both. sent15: everything is a whoop and/or it is not a tankard. sent16: something is voltaic but it is not a Loiseleuria if it is not a kind of a tankard. sent17: if there exists something such that it does whoop and/or it is not microsomal the fact that the fumewort is a tankard is right. sent18: if that the fumewort is a preexistence is not incorrect then the neutralist is not a tankard but it is a kind of a Simpson. sent19: the haloform is microsomal. sent20: something does repaint and it is a preexistence if it is not inadequate. sent21: everything whoops and/or it is not microsomal. sent22: if there exists something such that it is not microsomal then the fumewort is a tankard. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: the breakax is a whoop and/or not microsomal.; int1 -> int2: something is a whoop and/or it is not microsomal.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fumewort is a tankard.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the neutralist is a Simpson.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: that the haloform is a kind of a preexistence is not false.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the scours is a kind of a preexistence but it is not inadequate.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__