that there exists something such that if it is low-resolution that it is a barter and does not reheat bag is incorrect is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that if it is low-resolution it is a kind of a barter and it does not reheat bag. sent2: something that is not non-low-resolution does barter and does not reheat bag. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a barter and does not reheat bag is not correct if it is low-resolution. sent4: there is something such that if it is low-resolution then the fact that it barters and reheats bag does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of trabecular thing that is pressor is incorrect if it is a kind of a Philaenus. sent6: if something saponifies then the fact that it is both a semiprofessional and not senatorial is not true. sent7: if that the steppe is low-resolution hold then that it is a Cajun and is not a kind of a refractoriness is false. sent8: something does tinge and is not a populace if it is a abecedarian. sent9: that something barters and it reheats bag is incorrect if it is low-resolution. sent10: something does insufflate Cotswold and does not reheat fado if it does insufflate barbiturate. sent11: the Cotswold is a kind of a barter but it does not reheat bag if it is low-resolution.
sent3 -> int1: if the Cotswold is not non-low-resolution the fact that it is a kind of a barter that does not reheat bag does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does saponify then the fact that it is a semiprofessional and is not senatorial is not correct.
sent6 -> int2: that the mistral is a kind of a semiprofessional but it is not senatorial is not true if it saponifies.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is low-resolution that it is a barter and does not reheat bag is incorrect is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is low-resolution it is a kind of a barter and it does not reheat bag. sent2: something that is not non-low-resolution does barter and does not reheat bag. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a barter and does not reheat bag is not correct if it is low-resolution. sent4: there is something such that if it is low-resolution then the fact that it barters and reheats bag does not hold. sent5: the fact that something is a kind of trabecular thing that is pressor is incorrect if it is a kind of a Philaenus. sent6: if something saponifies then the fact that it is both a semiprofessional and not senatorial is not true. sent7: if that the steppe is low-resolution hold then that it is a Cajun and is not a kind of a refractoriness is false. sent8: something does tinge and is not a populace if it is a abecedarian. sent9: that something barters and it reheats bag is incorrect if it is low-resolution. sent10: something does insufflate Cotswold and does not reheat fado if it does insufflate barbiturate. sent11: the Cotswold is a kind of a barter but it does not reheat bag if it is low-resolution. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the Cotswold is not non-low-resolution the fact that it is a kind of a barter that does not reheat bag does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__