the fact that there exists something such that if it does not enfeeble Boyne then it does not enfeeble tax does not hold.
sent1: if the windowsill does not enfeeble Boyne then it enfeebles tax. sent2: that the windowsill does enfeeble tax and it does enfeeble Boyne is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it does enfeeble Boyne it does not enfeeble tax. sent4: if the windowsill enfeebles Boyne it does not enfeeble tax. sent5: the windowsill does enfeeble intuitionism. sent6: the fact that something enfeebles Boyne and it is a kind of a spinsterhood does not hold if it does not enfeeble tax. sent7: that the windowsill enfeebles tax but it does not enfeeble Boyne is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not enfeeble Boyne it enfeebles tax. sent9: if the fact that the windowsill is not a kind of a tapotement but it does enfeeble tax is not correct then the fact that the baryon does not enfeeble tax is true. sent10: the windowsill does enfeeble photoemission and is not a Cambodian. sent11: if the fact that the fact that the spacecraft is not a timing but it is a NIPR is not correct is not incorrect the framework does not enfeeble tax. sent12: if the fact that something enfeebles Boyne and is a spinsterhood is wrong the fact that it is not a spinsterhood is not incorrect. sent13: that the windowsill does enfeeble tax and does not enfeeble fugleman is not true. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Adonic then it is not a kind of a researcher.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the windowsill enfeebles tax.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the windowsill does not enfeeble Boyne.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the windowsill does enfeeble tax but it does not enfeeble Boyne.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the windowsill does not enfeeble tax.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: if the windowsill does not enfeeble Boyne that it does not enfeeble tax hold.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the baryon is not a spinsterhood.
sent12 -> int5: the baryon is not a spinsterhood if that it does enfeeble Boyne and is a kind of a spinsterhood is not correct.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that if the baryon does not enfeeble tax then the fact that the baryon does enfeeble Boyne and it is a kind of a spinsterhood is not correct is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not enfeeble Boyne then it does not enfeeble tax does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the windowsill does not enfeeble Boyne then it enfeebles tax. sent2: that the windowsill does enfeeble tax and it does enfeeble Boyne is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it does enfeeble Boyne it does not enfeeble tax. sent4: if the windowsill enfeebles Boyne it does not enfeeble tax. sent5: the windowsill does enfeeble intuitionism. sent6: the fact that something enfeebles Boyne and it is a kind of a spinsterhood does not hold if it does not enfeeble tax. sent7: that the windowsill enfeebles tax but it does not enfeeble Boyne is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not enfeeble Boyne it enfeebles tax. sent9: if the fact that the windowsill is not a kind of a tapotement but it does enfeeble tax is not correct then the fact that the baryon does not enfeeble tax is true. sent10: the windowsill does enfeeble photoemission and is not a Cambodian. sent11: if the fact that the fact that the spacecraft is not a timing but it is a NIPR is not correct is not incorrect the framework does not enfeeble tax. sent12: if the fact that something enfeebles Boyne and is a spinsterhood is wrong the fact that it is not a spinsterhood is not incorrect. sent13: that the windowsill does enfeeble tax and does not enfeeble fugleman is not true. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a Adonic then it is not a kind of a researcher. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the windowsill enfeebles tax.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the windowsill does not enfeeble Boyne.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the windowsill does enfeeble tax but it does not enfeeble Boyne.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the windowsill does not enfeeble tax.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: if the windowsill does not enfeeble Boyne that it does not enfeeble tax hold.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__