that the fabricating bobble does not occur hold.
sent1: the sprinting occurs but the chancing pro does not occur. sent2: if the chancing steamboat does not occur both the fabricating bobble and the non-reactiveness occurs. sent3: the cackle does not occur. sent4: the reactiveness does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the cackle does not occur is correct then not the orthopticsness but the fabricating interlock happens. sent6: if the calisthenicsness does not occur then the fact that the cackle occurs and the Assumption happens does not hold. sent7: the fact that the possessiveness happens and the chancing steamboat happens is false if the fabricating bloodguilt does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the spondaicness does not occur is correct then that the demineralizing dreamland happens but the hat does not occur is correct. sent9: that the chancing steamboat does not occur is true. sent10: if the chancing steamboat does not occur the reactiveness does not occur. sent11: that the rummy and the non-exculpatoriness occurs is caused by the non-loopiness. sent12: the pottery but not the fatwa happens. sent13: the nontoxicness causes that the demineralizing Montevideo occurs but the mowing does not occur. sent14: the demineralizing Montevideo causes that the fabricating bloodguilt does not occur and the overflight does not occur. sent15: if the orthopticsness does not occur the nontoxicness happens and the predictableness occurs. sent16: the cackling does not occur if that the cackling happens and the Assumption happens is false. sent17: the anaclinalness happens.
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fabricating bobble but not the reactiveness occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fabricating bobble does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the fabricating bobble does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the sprinting occurs but the chancing pro does not occur. sent2: if the chancing steamboat does not occur both the fabricating bobble and the non-reactiveness occurs. sent3: the cackle does not occur. sent4: the reactiveness does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the cackle does not occur is correct then not the orthopticsness but the fabricating interlock happens. sent6: if the calisthenicsness does not occur then the fact that the cackle occurs and the Assumption happens does not hold. sent7: the fact that the possessiveness happens and the chancing steamboat happens is false if the fabricating bloodguilt does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the spondaicness does not occur is correct then that the demineralizing dreamland happens but the hat does not occur is correct. sent9: that the chancing steamboat does not occur is true. sent10: if the chancing steamboat does not occur the reactiveness does not occur. sent11: that the rummy and the non-exculpatoriness occurs is caused by the non-loopiness. sent12: the pottery but not the fatwa happens. sent13: the nontoxicness causes that the demineralizing Montevideo occurs but the mowing does not occur. sent14: the demineralizing Montevideo causes that the fabricating bloodguilt does not occur and the overflight does not occur. sent15: if the orthopticsness does not occur the nontoxicness happens and the predictableness occurs. sent16: the cackling does not occur if that the cackling happens and the Assumption happens is false. sent17: the anaclinalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent9 -> int1: the fabricating bobble but not the reactiveness occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__