the fact that there is something such that if that it is a Zeppelin and does not brighten is false then it is not a kind of a stability is wrong.
sent1: if the telegrapher is not a photoelectricity then it is not a Zeppelin. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a Zeppelin then it is not a stability. sent3: the intellectualization is not a stability if the fact that it is a Zeppelin and does not brighten is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is both a Aras and not spiritless is not right it is not scalene. sent5: if the fact that the intellectualization is a kind of a Zeppelin and it brightens is wrong it is not a stability. sent6: if that something is both not non-internal and non-intergalactic does not hold then it is not some. sent7: there is something such that if that it is a Zeppelin and does not brighten is not right it is a stability. sent8: if the fact that the intellectualization brightens and is not a Dover is wrong it does master encasement. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a Zeppelin and does brighten does not hold then it is not a stability. sent10: that the remount is not the Zeppelin if the remount is not a kind of a hotbox hold. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is focal and it is not formalistic is not correct then it is not electromotive. sent12: there is something such that if it does brighten it is not a stability.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is internal and it is not intergalactic does not hold then it is not some.
sent6 -> int1: if that the tappet is both not non-internal and non-intergalactic is false then it is not some.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is a Zeppelin and does not brighten is false then it is not a kind of a stability is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the telegrapher is not a photoelectricity then it is not a Zeppelin. sent2: there is something such that if it is not a Zeppelin then it is not a stability. sent3: the intellectualization is not a stability if the fact that it is a Zeppelin and does not brighten is wrong. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is both a Aras and not spiritless is not right it is not scalene. sent5: if the fact that the intellectualization is a kind of a Zeppelin and it brightens is wrong it is not a stability. sent6: if that something is both not non-internal and non-intergalactic does not hold then it is not some. sent7: there is something such that if that it is a Zeppelin and does not brighten is not right it is a stability. sent8: if the fact that the intellectualization brightens and is not a Dover is wrong it does master encasement. sent9: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a Zeppelin and does brighten does not hold then it is not a stability. sent10: that the remount is not the Zeppelin if the remount is not a kind of a hotbox hold. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is focal and it is not formalistic is not correct then it is not electromotive. sent12: there is something such that if it does brighten it is not a stability. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__