the factor is a doula.
sent1: if the stonefly does not circularize liberation then that the paramagnet does not circularize liberation is right. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of non-tactical thing that does not circularize liberation is incorrect if it is not a Occidental. sent3: the lepidolite is a decrease if the paramagnet snarls factor. sent4: something does snarl factor if it is not a kind of a wattmeter and it does not circularize liberation. sent5: that something does refer and is not a clutter is not true if it decreases. sent6: something snarls factor if it is not a wattmeter and it does circularize liberation. sent7: if the stonefly is not a decrease the lepidolite is not tactical and is not a decrease. sent8: that the lepidolite does not refer but it does clutter is not correct if it is a decrease. sent9: that the lepidolite refers but it is not a clutter does not hold. sent10: something is not a kind of a doula if it is tactical. sent11: if something is a kind of a decrease that it does not refer and it does clutter is not correct. sent12: the stonefly is tactical. sent13: the paramagnet does snarl factor if it is not a wattmeter and it circularizes liberation. sent14: that the stonefly is a Occidental is right. sent15: if something is a kind of tactical a Occidental it does not circularize liberation. sent16: something is a decrease. sent17: the paramagnet is not a kind of a wattmeter and does not circularize liberation if the stonefly does not circularize liberation. sent18: if the lepidolite does decrease the fact that it refers and it is not a clutter is not true. sent19: that the fact that the lepidolite does not refer and does clutter hold is false. sent20: if the fact that the fact that the lepidolite does not refer and it is not a clutter is true is incorrect the factor is a kind of a doula. sent21: if the stonefly is not a wattmeter it is not a Occidental and it snarls factor. sent22: the paramagnet does not circularize liberation.
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the stonefly is tactical and it is a kind of a Occidental.; sent15 -> int2: the stonefly does not circularize liberation if it is tactical and it is a kind of a Occidental.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stonefly does not circularize liberation.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the paramagnet is not a wattmeter and does not circularize liberation.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the paramagnet does snarl factor is not incorrect if it is not a wattmeter and does not circularize liberation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the paramagnet snarls factor.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the lepidolite is a decrease.;
the factor is not a doula.
sent10 -> int8: the factor is not a doula if it is tactical.; sent2 -> int9: that the stonefly is non-tactical thing that does not circularize liberation does not hold if it is not a kind of a Occidental.;
$hypothesis$ = the factor is a doula. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stonefly does not circularize liberation then that the paramagnet does not circularize liberation is right. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of non-tactical thing that does not circularize liberation is incorrect if it is not a Occidental. sent3: the lepidolite is a decrease if the paramagnet snarls factor. sent4: something does snarl factor if it is not a kind of a wattmeter and it does not circularize liberation. sent5: that something does refer and is not a clutter is not true if it decreases. sent6: something snarls factor if it is not a wattmeter and it does circularize liberation. sent7: if the stonefly is not a decrease the lepidolite is not tactical and is not a decrease. sent8: that the lepidolite does not refer but it does clutter is not correct if it is a decrease. sent9: that the lepidolite refers but it is not a clutter does not hold. sent10: something is not a kind of a doula if it is tactical. sent11: if something is a kind of a decrease that it does not refer and it does clutter is not correct. sent12: the stonefly is tactical. sent13: the paramagnet does snarl factor if it is not a wattmeter and it circularizes liberation. sent14: that the stonefly is a Occidental is right. sent15: if something is a kind of tactical a Occidental it does not circularize liberation. sent16: something is a decrease. sent17: the paramagnet is not a kind of a wattmeter and does not circularize liberation if the stonefly does not circularize liberation. sent18: if the lepidolite does decrease the fact that it refers and it is not a clutter is not true. sent19: that the fact that the lepidolite does not refer and does clutter hold is false. sent20: if the fact that the fact that the lepidolite does not refer and it is not a clutter is true is incorrect the factor is a kind of a doula. sent21: if the stonefly is not a wattmeter it is not a Occidental and it snarls factor. sent22: the paramagnet does not circularize liberation. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the stonefly is tactical and it is a kind of a Occidental.; sent15 -> int2: the stonefly does not circularize liberation if it is tactical and it is a kind of a Occidental.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the stonefly does not circularize liberation.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the paramagnet is not a wattmeter and does not circularize liberation.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the paramagnet does snarl factor is not incorrect if it is not a wattmeter and does not circularize liberation.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the paramagnet snarls factor.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the lepidolite is a decrease.; __UNKNOWN__