the diode does not redound and is a NC.
sent1: if the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is not a kind of a stoning is not false then it is not parietal. sent2: the gimbal is a gynoecium if the diphenylhydantoin does not sniff name and is a vertebra. sent3: the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is both not a painted and nomothetic is false if it is not vocalic. sent4: if the bassarisk is phonemic then the fact that the Mountie is indefinite is not false. sent5: the fact that something is phonemic and/or it is parietal is not right if it does not stone. sent6: if the Mountie does consolidate orgasm the fact that the gimbal is not phonemic and is a kind of a gynoecium is wrong. sent7: the diphenylhydantoin is not a stoning if the fact that it is indefinite is not true. sent8: the diphenylhydantoin is not vocalic. sent9: if the fact that the bassarisk is not a kind of a NC and does not consolidate orgasm is not right the Mountie does consolidate orgasm. sent10: something consolidates orgasm if that it does not paint and it is nomothetic is not correct. sent11: if the Mountie is not definite the gimbal is not definite. sent12: there exists nothing such that that it is not a NC and it does not consolidate orgasm hold. sent13: if the diphenylhydantoin is not a kind of a vertebra it is not indefinite. sent14: something that does not stone is not parietal. sent15: if something is not a stoning the fact that it does not redound and is a NC is not correct. sent16: the Mountie is a kind of a NC if the gimbal is a gynoecium. sent17: the diode does not redound but it is a NC if the Mountie is a kind of a NC. sent18: if the diphenylhydantoin is non-vocalic then the fact that it is a painted and it is nomothetic is wrong. sent19: if the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is phonemic and/or not non-parietal is false then it does not consolidate orgasm. sent20: if there exists something such that it is phonemic then that the diode is parietal and a stoning is wrong. sent21: the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is not a stoning and/or is parietal does not hold if the gimbal is not indefinite. sent22: that the diphenylhydantoin is parietal does not hold. sent23: that if that the Mountie is not the NC but it sniffs name is false the Mountie is not a vertebra hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the diphenylhydantoin does not sniff name and is a kind of a vertebra does not hold.; sent5 -> int1: that the diphenylhydantoin is phonemic and/or it is parietal is false if it is not a kind of a stoning.; sent10 -> int2: if that the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is not a painted but it is nomothetic is wrong hold it does consolidate orgasm.; sent3 & sent8 -> int3: that the diphenylhydantoin is not a painted and not non-nomothetic is not right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the diphenylhydantoin does consolidate orgasm.;
the diode is not indefinite.
sent12 -> int5: that the bassarisk is not a NC and does not consolidate orgasm does not hold.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: the Mountie does consolidate orgasm.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: that the gimbal is not phonemic but it is a kind of a gynoecium is false.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not phonemic and it is a gynoecium is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the diode does not redound and is a NC. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is not a kind of a stoning is not false then it is not parietal. sent2: the gimbal is a gynoecium if the diphenylhydantoin does not sniff name and is a vertebra. sent3: the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is both not a painted and nomothetic is false if it is not vocalic. sent4: if the bassarisk is phonemic then the fact that the Mountie is indefinite is not false. sent5: the fact that something is phonemic and/or it is parietal is not right if it does not stone. sent6: if the Mountie does consolidate orgasm the fact that the gimbal is not phonemic and is a kind of a gynoecium is wrong. sent7: the diphenylhydantoin is not a stoning if the fact that it is indefinite is not true. sent8: the diphenylhydantoin is not vocalic. sent9: if the fact that the bassarisk is not a kind of a NC and does not consolidate orgasm is not right the Mountie does consolidate orgasm. sent10: something consolidates orgasm if that it does not paint and it is nomothetic is not correct. sent11: if the Mountie is not definite the gimbal is not definite. sent12: there exists nothing such that that it is not a NC and it does not consolidate orgasm hold. sent13: if the diphenylhydantoin is not a kind of a vertebra it is not indefinite. sent14: something that does not stone is not parietal. sent15: if something is not a stoning the fact that it does not redound and is a NC is not correct. sent16: the Mountie is a kind of a NC if the gimbal is a gynoecium. sent17: the diode does not redound but it is a NC if the Mountie is a kind of a NC. sent18: if the diphenylhydantoin is non-vocalic then the fact that it is a painted and it is nomothetic is wrong. sent19: if the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is phonemic and/or not non-parietal is false then it does not consolidate orgasm. sent20: if there exists something such that it is phonemic then that the diode is parietal and a stoning is wrong. sent21: the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is not a stoning and/or is parietal does not hold if the gimbal is not indefinite. sent22: that the diphenylhydantoin is parietal does not hold. sent23: that if that the Mountie is not the NC but it sniffs name is false the Mountie is not a vertebra hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the diphenylhydantoin does not sniff name and is a kind of a vertebra does not hold.; sent5 -> int1: that the diphenylhydantoin is phonemic and/or it is parietal is false if it is not a kind of a stoning.; sent10 -> int2: if that the fact that the diphenylhydantoin is not a painted but it is nomothetic is wrong hold it does consolidate orgasm.; sent3 & sent8 -> int3: that the diphenylhydantoin is not a painted and not non-nomothetic is not right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the diphenylhydantoin does consolidate orgasm.; __UNKNOWN__