the godson is a nelson.
sent1: the electrophorus is not a kind of a nelson. sent2: if something is not grammatical and/or deposes dramaturgy it does not resubmit flute. sent3: the fact that the fact that something does not educe and is oleaceous hold is not right if it is behavioristic. sent4: that the depiction is not a nelson is true. sent5: a proximate thing is non-oleaceous thing that is not behavioristic. sent6: the sarcosome is not a nelson. sent7: the portmanteau is not a kind of a punctuality. sent8: the run does not resubmit depiction if it is not mural and/or it dehydrogenates Cairene. sent9: everything is proximate. sent10: if something is not chaotic and/or it is a hospitableness then the fact that it is not a kind of an underdevelopment hold. sent11: there exists nothing such that it is not proximate and is not illegible. sent12: that the godson is a kind of a punctuality does not hold. sent13: the godson is not oleaceous. sent14: the godson does dehydrogenate Cairene and/or it does live. sent15: the godson is a punctuality or dehydrogenates Cairene or both. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a punctuality or does dehydrogenate Cairene or both is not false that it is not a nelson is not incorrect.
sent16 -> int1: the godson is not a nelson if it is not a kind of a punctuality and/or it dehydrogenates Cairene.; sent12 -> int2: either the godson is not a punctuality or it dehydrogenates Cairene or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the godson is a nelson.
sent9 -> int3: the flute is proximate.; sent5 -> int4: if the flute is proximate then it is not oleaceous and it is not behavioristic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the flute is not oleaceous and it is not behavioristic.; int5 -> int6: everything is not oleaceous and it is not behavioristic.; int6 -> int7: the godson is a kind of non-oleaceous thing that is not behavioristic.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the godson is not oleaceous is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the godson is a nelson. ; $context$ = sent1: the electrophorus is not a kind of a nelson. sent2: if something is not grammatical and/or deposes dramaturgy it does not resubmit flute. sent3: the fact that the fact that something does not educe and is oleaceous hold is not right if it is behavioristic. sent4: that the depiction is not a nelson is true. sent5: a proximate thing is non-oleaceous thing that is not behavioristic. sent6: the sarcosome is not a nelson. sent7: the portmanteau is not a kind of a punctuality. sent8: the run does not resubmit depiction if it is not mural and/or it dehydrogenates Cairene. sent9: everything is proximate. sent10: if something is not chaotic and/or it is a hospitableness then the fact that it is not a kind of an underdevelopment hold. sent11: there exists nothing such that it is not proximate and is not illegible. sent12: that the godson is a kind of a punctuality does not hold. sent13: the godson is not oleaceous. sent14: the godson does dehydrogenate Cairene and/or it does live. sent15: the godson is a punctuality or dehydrogenates Cairene or both. sent16: if the fact that something is not a kind of a punctuality or does dehydrogenate Cairene or both is not false that it is not a nelson is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the godson is not a nelson if it is not a kind of a punctuality and/or it dehydrogenates Cairene.; sent12 -> int2: either the godson is not a punctuality or it dehydrogenates Cairene or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__