the pachinko happens.
sent1: the nodding does not occur and the raking banned does not occur if the RAIU does not occur. sent2: the flatnessness occurs and the beginning Samoyedic happens. sent3: the aviation and the emanation happens. sent4: if the fact that the nodding does not occur and the raking banned does not occur is true then that the limitation does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if the modality does not occur both the respiratoriness and the valetudinarian occurs. sent6: the limitation is caused by the cosmicness. sent7: the pachinko happens if the wildingness happens. sent8: the limitation happens if the wilding happens. sent9: if the sniff does not occur either the raking Silex or the blocking antiaircraft or both occurs. sent10: the raking banned happens and the respiratoriness happens. sent11: if the vibrationalness does not occur then the fact that both the sniff and the red-eyeing happens is false. sent12: the wildingness happens and/or the cosmicness occurs. sent13: if the limitation does not occur then that the cosmicness but not the nod occurs does not hold. sent14: if the nod does not occur that the RAIU happens and the blocking backhander happens is false. sent15: if both the limitation and the nod happens the raking banned does not occur. sent16: if both the aviation and the emanation occurs the vibrationalness does not occur. sent17: if the wildingness does not occur the centripetalness happens. sent18: the wildingness does not occur if the fact that the cosmicness does not occur and the wildingness happens is not right. sent19: if the fact that the RAIU happens and the blocking backhander occurs does not hold then the pachinko does not occur. sent20: if that the sniff happens and the red-eyeing occurs does not hold then that the sniff does not occur hold.
sent12 & sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the limitation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nodding happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the limitation and the nodding happens.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the raking banned does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: the raking banned happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the nod does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that both the RAIU and the blocking backhander occurs is not correct.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the pachinko occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the pachinko happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the nodding does not occur and the raking banned does not occur if the RAIU does not occur. sent2: the flatnessness occurs and the beginning Samoyedic happens. sent3: the aviation and the emanation happens. sent4: if the fact that the nodding does not occur and the raking banned does not occur is true then that the limitation does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: if the modality does not occur both the respiratoriness and the valetudinarian occurs. sent6: the limitation is caused by the cosmicness. sent7: the pachinko happens if the wildingness happens. sent8: the limitation happens if the wilding happens. sent9: if the sniff does not occur either the raking Silex or the blocking antiaircraft or both occurs. sent10: the raking banned happens and the respiratoriness happens. sent11: if the vibrationalness does not occur then the fact that both the sniff and the red-eyeing happens is false. sent12: the wildingness happens and/or the cosmicness occurs. sent13: if the limitation does not occur then that the cosmicness but not the nod occurs does not hold. sent14: if the nod does not occur that the RAIU happens and the blocking backhander happens is false. sent15: if both the limitation and the nod happens the raking banned does not occur. sent16: if both the aviation and the emanation occurs the vibrationalness does not occur. sent17: if the wildingness does not occur the centripetalness happens. sent18: the wildingness does not occur if the fact that the cosmicness does not occur and the wildingness happens is not right. sent19: if the fact that the RAIU happens and the blocking backhander occurs does not hold then the pachinko does not occur. sent20: if that the sniff happens and the red-eyeing occurs does not hold then that the sniff does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent8 & sent6 -> int1: the limitation occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nodding happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the limitation and the nodding happens.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the raking banned does not occur.; sent10 -> int4: the raking banned happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the nod does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that both the RAIU and the blocking backhander occurs is not correct.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__