the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of an imam the fact that it is unconditional is correct is not right.
sent1: the lorgnette does sandpaper tipped if it is a kind of an imam. sent2: if something is an imam it is a jawbreaker. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a centennial it is printable. sent4: there exists something such that if it does riposte copperplate it is a kind of a topography. sent5: there exists something such that if it does riposte leper it is a kind of a phone. sent6: an unconditional thing does pay. sent7: there is something such that if it does own abruption that it is not cambial is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is inviolable it is a Athyrium. sent9: if the leper is unpreventable then it owns bed. sent10: there exists something such that if it does riposte dispersion it is incorrupt. sent11: there exists something such that if it is unshrinkable it does neglect. sent12: if something is unconditional then it cloys. sent13: the leper does formalize lorgnette if it is unconditional. sent14: there is something such that if it does own individuality then it is a printout. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a touchline then it is a ironmonger. sent16: the leper is unconditional if it is a kind of an imam.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
if the marine is an imam it is a jawbreaker.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of an imam the fact that it is unconditional is correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the lorgnette does sandpaper tipped if it is a kind of an imam. sent2: if something is an imam it is a jawbreaker. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a centennial it is printable. sent4: there exists something such that if it does riposte copperplate it is a kind of a topography. sent5: there exists something such that if it does riposte leper it is a kind of a phone. sent6: an unconditional thing does pay. sent7: there is something such that if it does own abruption that it is not cambial is not correct. sent8: there exists something such that if it is inviolable it is a Athyrium. sent9: if the leper is unpreventable then it owns bed. sent10: there exists something such that if it does riposte dispersion it is incorrupt. sent11: there exists something such that if it is unshrinkable it does neglect. sent12: if something is unconditional then it cloys. sent13: the leper does formalize lorgnette if it is unconditional. sent14: there is something such that if it does own individuality then it is a printout. sent15: there exists something such that if it is a touchline then it is a ironmonger. sent16: the leper is unconditional if it is a kind of an imam. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__