the heteroeciousness occurs.
sent1: the spam does not occur and the capableness does not occur. sent2: the immoralness happens if the sally happens. sent3: the costing happens. sent4: both the non-monophonicness and the non-antiviralness happens. sent5: the accusatorialness does not occur if the dangerousness does not occur. sent6: the snagging does not occur. sent7: the freshet occurs. sent8: the royal happens. sent9: the sally and the barring occurs. sent10: that the laryngospasm happens is caused by that the conservativeness happens but the accusatorialness does not occur. sent11: the non-heteroeciousness is caused by that not the intimidation but the dangerousness occurs. sent12: the immoralness leads to that the laryngospasm does not occur and the snag does not occur. sent13: the drinking alluvium but not the warming buffoonery happens. sent14: the non-conservativeness prevents the non-heteroeciousness. sent15: the sprinting does not occur. sent16: the acinarness does not occur if the alphanumericsness occurs. sent17: the carbonating hartebeest occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conservative occurs.; sent9 -> int1: the sally happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the immoralness happens.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the laryngospasm does not occur and the snag does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the laryngospasm does not occur.;
the heteroeciousness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the heteroeciousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the spam does not occur and the capableness does not occur. sent2: the immoralness happens if the sally happens. sent3: the costing happens. sent4: both the non-monophonicness and the non-antiviralness happens. sent5: the accusatorialness does not occur if the dangerousness does not occur. sent6: the snagging does not occur. sent7: the freshet occurs. sent8: the royal happens. sent9: the sally and the barring occurs. sent10: that the laryngospasm happens is caused by that the conservativeness happens but the accusatorialness does not occur. sent11: the non-heteroeciousness is caused by that not the intimidation but the dangerousness occurs. sent12: the immoralness leads to that the laryngospasm does not occur and the snag does not occur. sent13: the drinking alluvium but not the warming buffoonery happens. sent14: the non-conservativeness prevents the non-heteroeciousness. sent15: the sprinting does not occur. sent16: the acinarness does not occur if the alphanumericsness occurs. sent17: the carbonating hartebeest occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conservative occurs.; sent9 -> int1: the sally happens.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the immoralness happens.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the laryngospasm does not occur and the snag does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the laryngospasm does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__