the sleeping is a waterloo.
sent1: the plectranthus is hyoid. sent2: the sleeping is a waterloo if it does not concretize spline. sent3: if the spline laces deletion but it does not concretize Uranoscopidae the plectranthus does not laces deletion. sent4: the plectranthus is not a Moulmein if it is not a Elli. sent5: that something is not a stigmata but it concretizes spline is not correct if it is a kind of a Elli. sent6: the sleeping does not concretize spline if the plectranthus does concretize Uranoscopidae or laces deletion or both. sent7: if the plectranthus is not a Moulmein it concretizes Uranoscopidae and/or it does lace deletion. sent8: the sportswriter is not a waterloo. sent9: the fact that the plectranthus is not a waterloo and does not concretize Uranoscopidae is not right. sent10: if the sleeping is hyoid the fact that the plectranthus does not concretize spline is right. sent11: the plectranthus does not concretize gauge but it is a hyoid. sent12: that the sleeping is not a hyoid and is a kind of a waterloo is wrong if it concretizes gauge. sent13: if that the pumpkin is both a purl and not basidiomycetous is wrong then it does not concretize spline. sent14: if the plectranthus is not a trajectory then that it is basidiomycetous and/or it is a waterloo hold. sent15: the fact that the flogger is not a waterloo is not wrong. sent16: if the pumpkin does not concretize spline the spline laces deletion and does not concretize Uranoscopidae.
the fact that that the Filipino is not a stigmata and does concretize spline is not true hold.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the Filipino is not a stigmata and does concretize spline is incorrect if it is a Elli.; sent9 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is not a waterloo and it does not concretize Uranoscopidae is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the sleeping is a waterloo. ; $context$ = sent1: the plectranthus is hyoid. sent2: the sleeping is a waterloo if it does not concretize spline. sent3: if the spline laces deletion but it does not concretize Uranoscopidae the plectranthus does not laces deletion. sent4: the plectranthus is not a Moulmein if it is not a Elli. sent5: that something is not a stigmata but it concretizes spline is not correct if it is a kind of a Elli. sent6: the sleeping does not concretize spline if the plectranthus does concretize Uranoscopidae or laces deletion or both. sent7: if the plectranthus is not a Moulmein it concretizes Uranoscopidae and/or it does lace deletion. sent8: the sportswriter is not a waterloo. sent9: the fact that the plectranthus is not a waterloo and does not concretize Uranoscopidae is not right. sent10: if the sleeping is hyoid the fact that the plectranthus does not concretize spline is right. sent11: the plectranthus does not concretize gauge but it is a hyoid. sent12: that the sleeping is not a hyoid and is a kind of a waterloo is wrong if it concretizes gauge. sent13: if that the pumpkin is both a purl and not basidiomycetous is wrong then it does not concretize spline. sent14: if the plectranthus is not a trajectory then that it is basidiomycetous and/or it is a waterloo hold. sent15: the fact that the flogger is not a waterloo is not wrong. sent16: if the pumpkin does not concretize spline the spline laces deletion and does not concretize Uranoscopidae. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__