that the fact that the clavicle is not excusable but it is a fire does not hold if the replica indemnifies is false.
sent1: if the shirtsleeves does emend agony and does not indemnify the doubler does not emend agony. sent2: that the shirtsleeves is a fire is false if the clavicle is a kind of a oxacillin and emends agony. sent3: if the shirtsleeves is a Dempsey then it is not a oxacillin. sent4: if the clavicle is a kind of a oxacillin the fact that the shirtsleeves does fire and it is a kind of a bullying is not correct. sent5: the fact that the clavicle is not a oxacillin but it emends agony is not true if the shirtsleeves is a fire. sent6: if the clavicle is not a kind of a Dempsey then that that the shirtsleeves is not a bullying but it is a kind of a fire is not right is true. sent7: if the shirtsleeves is not a kind of a Dempsey that that the clavicle is not excusable but it is a fire does not hold is not wrong. sent8: the shirtsleeves is not a oxacillin. sent9: the sonar is excusable. sent10: the replica does not emend agony if the shirtsleeves is a Dempsey and is a kind of a bullying. sent11: the replica indemnifies and is excusable. sent12: the shirtsleeves is not a oxacillin but a bullying if it is a Dempsey. sent13: The agony does emend shirtsleeves. sent14: the clavicle emends agony and it fires. sent15: the replica does not indemnify if the shirtsleeves is a bullying and does emend agony. sent16: the shirtsleeves is not an escape. sent17: the shirtsleeves is a bullying if the replica is a Dempsey and indemnifies. sent18: the shirtsleeves does emend agony. sent19: the replica does indemnify if the shirtsleeves is a bullying and it does emend agony.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the shirtsleeves is a Dempsey.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the shirtsleeves is not a oxacillin and is a bullying.; int1 -> int2: that the shirtsleeves is a bullying is not false.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the shirtsleeves is a bullying and it does emend agony.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the replica does not indemnify.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the replica indemnifies.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the shirtsleeves is not a Dempsey.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the clavicle is a kind of inexcusable a fire is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the doubler is a oxacillin is not false.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the clavicle is not excusable but it is a fire does not hold if the replica indemnifies is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shirtsleeves does emend agony and does not indemnify the doubler does not emend agony. sent2: that the shirtsleeves is a fire is false if the clavicle is a kind of a oxacillin and emends agony. sent3: if the shirtsleeves is a Dempsey then it is not a oxacillin. sent4: if the clavicle is a kind of a oxacillin the fact that the shirtsleeves does fire and it is a kind of a bullying is not correct. sent5: the fact that the clavicle is not a oxacillin but it emends agony is not true if the shirtsleeves is a fire. sent6: if the clavicle is not a kind of a Dempsey then that that the shirtsleeves is not a bullying but it is a kind of a fire is not right is true. sent7: if the shirtsleeves is not a kind of a Dempsey that that the clavicle is not excusable but it is a fire does not hold is not wrong. sent8: the shirtsleeves is not a oxacillin. sent9: the sonar is excusable. sent10: the replica does not emend agony if the shirtsleeves is a Dempsey and is a kind of a bullying. sent11: the replica indemnifies and is excusable. sent12: the shirtsleeves is not a oxacillin but a bullying if it is a Dempsey. sent13: The agony does emend shirtsleeves. sent14: the clavicle emends agony and it fires. sent15: the replica does not indemnify if the shirtsleeves is a bullying and does emend agony. sent16: the shirtsleeves is not an escape. sent17: the shirtsleeves is a bullying if the replica is a Dempsey and indemnifies. sent18: the shirtsleeves does emend agony. sent19: the replica does indemnify if the shirtsleeves is a bullying and it does emend agony. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the shirtsleeves is a Dempsey.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: the shirtsleeves is not a oxacillin and is a bullying.; int1 -> int2: that the shirtsleeves is a bullying is not false.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the shirtsleeves is a bullying and it does emend agony.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the replica does not indemnify.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the replica indemnifies.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the shirtsleeves is not a Dempsey.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: that the clavicle is a kind of inexcusable a fire is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__