the impurity contorts comprehension.
sent1: if the fact that the fact that the impurity does contort comprehension or it is not a kind of a Gish or both is not wrong does not hold then it does not thrill memorability. sent2: if something is disjunctive then that it is a Gish and does not bedizen Bavarian is not true. sent3: the impurity does thrill memorability if it is a kind of a sesquipedality and it is not Lutheran. sent4: if the Antiguan is a methodology then the impurity is a sesquipedality but it is not a Lutheran. sent5: the Bavarian is not a Gish. sent6: something that contorts Meyerhof is disjunctive. sent7: the fact that something does thrill memorability and it does contort Meyerhof is not correct if it is not disjunctive. sent8: if the Antiguan does contort Meyerhof the impurity does contort comprehension. sent9: the Antiguan is a Gish if the Bavarian is disjunctive. sent10: if the fact that the fact that something is a Kotex or does not bedizen Bavarian or both is not wrong does not hold it is not disjunctive. sent11: the fact that the Antiguan thrills memorability and contorts Meyerhof is incorrect. sent12: if something is a kind of a Kotex then it does not contort comprehension. sent13: if that the Bavarian fits Sitter and/or it is not basaltic does not hold it does not contort Meyerhof. sent14: that the Antiguan contorts comprehension and it is disjunctive does not hold. sent15: that something is a kind of a leaf-cutter that is not a pragmatics does not hold if it does not bedizen Bavarian. sent16: if the Antiguan is a Kotex then that the Bavarian is a Gish hold. sent17: the fact that the Antiguan does thrill memorability and does contort Meyerhof does not hold if it is not disjunctive. sent18: the impurity does contort comprehension if the fact that the Antiguan thrills memorability and does not contort Meyerhof does not hold. sent19: if that the fact that the Bavarian does not contort courtier and it is not Incan does not hold is true the Antiguan is a methodology. sent20: if the Antiguan does not bedizen Bavarian then the Bavarian is a Gish.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Antiguan is a kind of a Kotex and/or does not bedizen Bavarian.; assump1 & sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the Bavarian is a kind of a Gish.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that either the Antiguan is a kind of a Kotex or it does not bedizen Bavarian or both does not hold.; sent10 -> int4: if that the Antiguan is a Kotex or it does not bedizen Bavarian or both is not right then it is non-disjunctive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Antiguan is not disjunctive.;
the impurity does not contort comprehension.
sent12 -> int6: the impurity does not contort comprehension if it is a kind of a Kotex.; sent2 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the impurity is a Gish but it does not bedizen Bavarian is not wrong is not true if that it is disjunctive is correct.; sent6 -> int8: if the impurity contorts Meyerhof it is not non-disjunctive.;
$hypothesis$ = the impurity contorts comprehension. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fact that the impurity does contort comprehension or it is not a kind of a Gish or both is not wrong does not hold then it does not thrill memorability. sent2: if something is disjunctive then that it is a Gish and does not bedizen Bavarian is not true. sent3: the impurity does thrill memorability if it is a kind of a sesquipedality and it is not Lutheran. sent4: if the Antiguan is a methodology then the impurity is a sesquipedality but it is not a Lutheran. sent5: the Bavarian is not a Gish. sent6: something that contorts Meyerhof is disjunctive. sent7: the fact that something does thrill memorability and it does contort Meyerhof is not correct if it is not disjunctive. sent8: if the Antiguan does contort Meyerhof the impurity does contort comprehension. sent9: the Antiguan is a Gish if the Bavarian is disjunctive. sent10: if the fact that the fact that something is a Kotex or does not bedizen Bavarian or both is not wrong does not hold it is not disjunctive. sent11: the fact that the Antiguan thrills memorability and contorts Meyerhof is incorrect. sent12: if something is a kind of a Kotex then it does not contort comprehension. sent13: if that the Bavarian fits Sitter and/or it is not basaltic does not hold it does not contort Meyerhof. sent14: that the Antiguan contorts comprehension and it is disjunctive does not hold. sent15: that something is a kind of a leaf-cutter that is not a pragmatics does not hold if it does not bedizen Bavarian. sent16: if the Antiguan is a Kotex then that the Bavarian is a Gish hold. sent17: the fact that the Antiguan does thrill memorability and does contort Meyerhof does not hold if it is not disjunctive. sent18: the impurity does contort comprehension if the fact that the Antiguan thrills memorability and does not contort Meyerhof does not hold. sent19: if that the fact that the Bavarian does not contort courtier and it is not Incan does not hold is true the Antiguan is a methodology. sent20: if the Antiguan does not bedizen Bavarian then the Bavarian is a Gish. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Antiguan is a kind of a Kotex and/or does not bedizen Bavarian.; assump1 & sent16 & sent20 -> int1: the Bavarian is a kind of a Gish.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that either the Antiguan is a kind of a Kotex or it does not bedizen Bavarian or both does not hold.; sent10 -> int4: if that the Antiguan is a Kotex or it does not bedizen Bavarian or both is not right then it is non-disjunctive.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Antiguan is not disjunctive.; __UNKNOWN__