that the Ritz is both interstitial and not certain is not true.
sent1: if the Ritz is not a kind of a prang it is a kind of a arity. sent2: if the Ritz is a pro the mandrill is a prang and not a sequestration. sent3: if there is something such that it is weedless that the shambles is both a pro and not certain is not true. sent4: if the Ritz is weedless then that the mandrill does unionize chanter is not wrong. sent5: something is not a steppe if that it is a kind of a steppe and it is interstitial is false. sent6: the mandrill is a kind of a sequestration if the Ritz is a arity. sent7: if the Ritz is not a steppe then the mandrill is not a arity and not a prang. sent8: if the cerecloth does unionize chanter then it is weedless. sent9: the mandrill is not a kind of a pro but it does unionize chanter. sent10: if the mandrill is a kind of a prang then the Ritz is not non-interstitial but uncertain. sent11: the mandrill unionizes chanter. sent12: if the Ritz prangs the fact that it is interstitial and it is not certain is wrong. sent13: if the Ritz is a sequestration the mandrill prangs but it does not unionize chanter. sent14: if that the mandrill is not a sequestration is true then that it is certain is not incorrect. sent15: the Ritz is weedless. sent16: the mandrill is weedless and it is a steppe if it is not a pro. sent17: if that the cerecloth is not empiric is right then that it is not a blazer and it is not bicylindrical is not true. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not uncertain then the Ritz is not a kind of a sequestration. sent19: if something is not a sequestration then the fact that it is a steppe and it is interstitial is incorrect. sent20: that the Ritz is interstitial and certain is incorrect if it is a prang. sent21: the cerecloth unionizes chanter if that it is not a kind of a blazer and is not bicylindrical is false. sent22: if there exists something such that that it is a pro and it is not certain is false then the name is certain. sent23: the cerecloth is not empiric. sent24: if the shambles is not a steppe then the name either is a kind of a arity or prangs or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ritz is not a prang.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Ritz is a arity.; sent9 -> int2: the mandrill is not a kind of a pro.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the mandrill is weedless and it is a kind of a steppe.; int3 -> int4: the mandrill is a steppe.;
the fact that the mandrill is not a kind of a arity hold.
sent5 -> int5: if the fact that the Ritz is a steppe that is interstitial does not hold then it is not a steppe.; sent19 -> int6: that the Ritz is a steppe and it is interstitial is not correct if it is not a sequestration.; sent17 & sent23 -> int7: that the cerecloth is not a kind of a blazer and is not bicylindrical is wrong.; sent21 & int7 -> int8: that the cerecloth does unionize chanter is right.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the cerecloth is weedless.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is weedless.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the fact that the shambles is a pro but it is not certain is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is pro and it is not certain does not hold.; int12 & sent22 -> int13: the name is certain.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is certain.; int14 & sent18 -> int15: the Ritz is not a kind of a sequestration.; int6 & int15 -> int16: that the Ritz is a steppe and interstitial is false.; int5 & int16 -> int17: the Ritz is not a steppe.; sent7 & int17 -> int18: the mandrill is not a arity and it is not a kind of a prang.; int18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Ritz is both interstitial and not certain is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Ritz is not a kind of a prang it is a kind of a arity. sent2: if the Ritz is a pro the mandrill is a prang and not a sequestration. sent3: if there is something such that it is weedless that the shambles is both a pro and not certain is not true. sent4: if the Ritz is weedless then that the mandrill does unionize chanter is not wrong. sent5: something is not a steppe if that it is a kind of a steppe and it is interstitial is false. sent6: the mandrill is a kind of a sequestration if the Ritz is a arity. sent7: if the Ritz is not a steppe then the mandrill is not a arity and not a prang. sent8: if the cerecloth does unionize chanter then it is weedless. sent9: the mandrill is not a kind of a pro but it does unionize chanter. sent10: if the mandrill is a kind of a prang then the Ritz is not non-interstitial but uncertain. sent11: the mandrill unionizes chanter. sent12: if the Ritz prangs the fact that it is interstitial and it is not certain is wrong. sent13: if the Ritz is a sequestration the mandrill prangs but it does not unionize chanter. sent14: if that the mandrill is not a sequestration is true then that it is certain is not incorrect. sent15: the Ritz is weedless. sent16: the mandrill is weedless and it is a steppe if it is not a pro. sent17: if that the cerecloth is not empiric is right then that it is not a blazer and it is not bicylindrical is not true. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not uncertain then the Ritz is not a kind of a sequestration. sent19: if something is not a sequestration then the fact that it is a steppe and it is interstitial is incorrect. sent20: that the Ritz is interstitial and certain is incorrect if it is a prang. sent21: the cerecloth unionizes chanter if that it is not a kind of a blazer and is not bicylindrical is false. sent22: if there exists something such that that it is a pro and it is not certain is false then the name is certain. sent23: the cerecloth is not empiric. sent24: if the shambles is not a steppe then the name either is a kind of a arity or prangs or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ritz is not a prang.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the Ritz is a arity.; sent9 -> int2: the mandrill is not a kind of a pro.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the mandrill is weedless and it is a kind of a steppe.; int3 -> int4: the mandrill is a steppe.; __UNKNOWN__