the pollard is not a researcher.
sent1: that the fact that something does not waft and it is not eukaryotic hold is incorrect if it is not a kind of an elasticity. sent2: the bombproof is not a Dianthus. sent3: the serial is not a researcher. sent4: there exists nothing that is a circuit and does breakfast jerboa. sent5: the pollard is not a researcher if that the mane does braid Stockton and is a Mesua is not correct. sent6: that the mane is a kind of reducible thing that braids Stockton is wrong. sent7: something is a kind of a muishond that does accept Lenard if that it is not a Dianthus hold. sent8: the pollard is not a Mesua if the mane is not a kind of a researcher. sent9: the filtrate is not a kind of a researcher if that the pollard does not waft and is not eukaryotic does not hold. sent10: the pollard does not braid Stockton. sent11: there exists nothing that is changeable thing that does accept Sirius. sent12: if the bombproof is not a debate the ribbing is not a kind of a rheumatologist and it does not breakfast filtrate. sent13: if the fact that the pollard is a Mesua and is a researcher is not correct the mane does not braid Stockton. sent14: something is not a kind of a loom but it breakfasts leak if that it does accept Lenard is right. sent15: something is not a debate if it does not loom and it does breakfast leak. sent16: the pollard is not a kind of an elasticity if there is something such that it is not a rheumatologist and it does not breakfast filtrate. sent17: the fact that something is not a kind of a researcher and does waft is not right if it is not eukaryotic.
the pollard is a kind of a researcher.
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the ribbing is not a researcher and does waft is incorrect if the fact that it is not eukaryotic is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the pollard is not a researcher. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that something does not waft and it is not eukaryotic hold is incorrect if it is not a kind of an elasticity. sent2: the bombproof is not a Dianthus. sent3: the serial is not a researcher. sent4: there exists nothing that is a circuit and does breakfast jerboa. sent5: the pollard is not a researcher if that the mane does braid Stockton and is a Mesua is not correct. sent6: that the mane is a kind of reducible thing that braids Stockton is wrong. sent7: something is a kind of a muishond that does accept Lenard if that it is not a Dianthus hold. sent8: the pollard is not a Mesua if the mane is not a kind of a researcher. sent9: the filtrate is not a kind of a researcher if that the pollard does not waft and is not eukaryotic does not hold. sent10: the pollard does not braid Stockton. sent11: there exists nothing that is changeable thing that does accept Sirius. sent12: if the bombproof is not a debate the ribbing is not a kind of a rheumatologist and it does not breakfast filtrate. sent13: if the fact that the pollard is a Mesua and is a researcher is not correct the mane does not braid Stockton. sent14: something is not a kind of a loom but it breakfasts leak if that it does accept Lenard is right. sent15: something is not a debate if it does not loom and it does breakfast leak. sent16: the pollard is not a kind of an elasticity if there is something such that it is not a rheumatologist and it does not breakfast filtrate. sent17: the fact that something is not a kind of a researcher and does waft is not right if it is not eukaryotic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__