the fact that the coydog does not approach Hinduism but it irritates is not true.
sent1: if the sowbane irritates then the coydog irritates. sent2: that either the Connecticuter does not approach Hinduism or it is Unitarian or both is correct. sent3: if that the callus is not an offer but it does approach forester does not hold then the sowbane does approach forester. sent4: if something is not a Unitarian then it is not a heathfowl and is a icepick. sent5: if either the Connecticuter is not a heathfowl or it is not Unitarian or both the sowbane does irritate. sent6: if the fact that something is non-tinny thing that is not a kind of a Bigfoot is wrong then it is not a nozzle. sent7: the Connecticuter is not a heathfowl or it is not a kind of a Unitarian or both if something is not a kind of a icepick. sent8: the callus is not a regularization. sent9: if something is not a nozzle it is a kind of a Halcyon or it is non-congregational or both. sent10: if something does not irritate but it is autoecious it is not a Unitarian. sent11: there is something such that it is not a icepick. sent12: the stinkpot is not a kind of a Gerbera but it approaches Hinduism if the Connecticuter is a kind of a icepick. sent13: if something is a Halcyon and/or it is not congregational it is not nectariferous. sent14: the Connecticuter is non-New thing that approaches Ancohuma. sent15: the sowbane is not deficient if that it does not freeze-dry heterosexual and it is a kind of a repeat does not hold. sent16: the Connecticuter is a heathfowl and it is a icepick if the sowbane is not a Unitarian. sent17: if the Connecticuter irritates the coydog is not a Unitarian but it does irritates. sent18: that something is not an offer but it approaches forester does not hold if it is not nectariferous. sent19: the fact that the coydog does not approach Hinduism but it irritates is not correct if the Connecticuter is a kind of a icepick. sent20: if something approaches forester the fact that that it does not freeze-dry heterosexual and it is a kind of a repeat is not false does not hold. sent21: if the sowbane does irritate the coydog does not approach Hinduism and does irritate. sent22: the fact that either something is not a rustiness or it is autoecious or both is wrong if it is not deficient. sent23: that the callus is not tinny and not a Bigfoot does not hold if it is not a kind of a regularization.
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the Connecticuter is not a kind of a heathfowl or it is not a kind of a Unitarian or both.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the sowbane does irritate.; sent21 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the coydog does not approach Hinduism but it does irritate is not true.
sent4 -> int3: the Connecticuter is not a heathfowl but it is a kind of a icepick if that it is not a Unitarian hold.; sent22 -> int4: if the sowbane is not deficient then that it is not a rustiness and/or it is autoecious is not right.; sent20 -> int5: that the sowbane does not freeze-dry heterosexual and does repeat is wrong if it approaches forester.; sent18 -> int6: that the callus is not an offer and does approach forester is not correct if it is not nectariferous.; sent13 -> int7: if the fact that the callus is a Halcyon and/or not congregational is not wrong then it is not nectariferous.; sent9 -> int8: if the callus is not a nozzle it is a Halcyon or it is not congregational or both.; sent6 -> int9: if the fact that the callus is both non-tinny and not a Bigfoot does not hold it is not a kind of a nozzle.; sent23 & sent8 -> int10: the fact that that the callus is a kind of non-tinny thing that is not a Bigfoot is not incorrect is incorrect.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the callus is not a nozzle.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the callus is a Halcyon or it is not congregational or both.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the callus is not nectariferous is not incorrect.; int6 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the callus is not an offer but it does approach forester is false.; sent3 & int14 -> int15: the sowbane does approach forester.; int5 & int15 -> int16: that the sowbane does not freeze-dry heterosexual and is a repeat is not true.; sent15 & int16 -> int17: the sowbane is not deficient.; int4 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the sowbane is not a rustiness or it is autoecious or both is not correct.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a rustiness and/or it is autoecious is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the coydog does not approach Hinduism but it irritates is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sowbane irritates then the coydog irritates. sent2: that either the Connecticuter does not approach Hinduism or it is Unitarian or both is correct. sent3: if that the callus is not an offer but it does approach forester does not hold then the sowbane does approach forester. sent4: if something is not a Unitarian then it is not a heathfowl and is a icepick. sent5: if either the Connecticuter is not a heathfowl or it is not Unitarian or both the sowbane does irritate. sent6: if the fact that something is non-tinny thing that is not a kind of a Bigfoot is wrong then it is not a nozzle. sent7: the Connecticuter is not a heathfowl or it is not a kind of a Unitarian or both if something is not a kind of a icepick. sent8: the callus is not a regularization. sent9: if something is not a nozzle it is a kind of a Halcyon or it is non-congregational or both. sent10: if something does not irritate but it is autoecious it is not a Unitarian. sent11: there is something such that it is not a icepick. sent12: the stinkpot is not a kind of a Gerbera but it approaches Hinduism if the Connecticuter is a kind of a icepick. sent13: if something is a Halcyon and/or it is not congregational it is not nectariferous. sent14: the Connecticuter is non-New thing that approaches Ancohuma. sent15: the sowbane is not deficient if that it does not freeze-dry heterosexual and it is a kind of a repeat does not hold. sent16: the Connecticuter is a heathfowl and it is a icepick if the sowbane is not a Unitarian. sent17: if the Connecticuter irritates the coydog is not a Unitarian but it does irritates. sent18: that something is not an offer but it approaches forester does not hold if it is not nectariferous. sent19: the fact that the coydog does not approach Hinduism but it irritates is not correct if the Connecticuter is a kind of a icepick. sent20: if something approaches forester the fact that that it does not freeze-dry heterosexual and it is a kind of a repeat is not false does not hold. sent21: if the sowbane does irritate the coydog does not approach Hinduism and does irritate. sent22: the fact that either something is not a rustiness or it is autoecious or both is wrong if it is not deficient. sent23: that the callus is not tinny and not a Bigfoot does not hold if it is not a kind of a regularization. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the Connecticuter is not a kind of a heathfowl or it is not a kind of a Unitarian or both.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the sowbane does irritate.; sent21 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__