the fact that if the littleneck is econometric the decumary does gear chattel is not correct.
sent1: if there is something such that it does hypertrophy and it is marsupial the gynoecium is not illegitimate. sent2: the fact that that the littleneck is not androgenic and it is not allergic is incorrect is not incorrect if the candytuft is not catachrestic. sent3: there are allergic and legitimate things. sent4: something is not androgenic if the fact that it is both non-allergic and androgenic is not true. sent5: something does gear chattel and it is legitimate. sent6: something is not econometric. sent7: something does hypertrophy and it is a kind of a marsupial. sent8: if the candytuft is androgenic the littleneck is not catachrestic. sent9: the decumary is a kind of a hypertrophy. sent10: if the fact that something is not androgenic and is not allergic is not correct then it is a pier. sent11: that the littleneck is not allergic but it is androgenic is not true if the decumary is not a kind of a pier. sent12: if something is allergic it is a kind of a pier. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it gears fulsomeness hold. sent14: that something does legitimate hold. sent15: the candytuft is not catachrestic if the gynoecium legitimates. sent16: the littleneck is legitimate. sent17: there is something such that it is a kind of a marsupial. sent18: the decumary does gear chattel if a pier is econometric. sent19: something does gear chattel and is allergic. sent20: the snuffler is a kind of marsupial thing that is not a hypertrophy if the gynoecium does not legitimate. sent21: the candytuft is legitimate.
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the gynoecium does legitimate.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the candytuft is not catachrestic.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the littleneck is not androgenic and it is not allergic is not right.; sent10 -> int4: if the fact that the littleneck is non-androgenic and it is not allergic is not right then it is a kind of a pier.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the littleneck is a pier.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the littleneck is econometric.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the littleneck is both a pier and econometric.; int6 -> int7: something is a pier and is econometric.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the decumary does gear chattel.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the snuffler is marsupial.
sent4 -> int9: the littleneck is not androgenic if the fact that it is not allergic and is androgenic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the littleneck is econometric the decumary does gear chattel is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does hypertrophy and it is marsupial the gynoecium is not illegitimate. sent2: the fact that that the littleneck is not androgenic and it is not allergic is incorrect is not incorrect if the candytuft is not catachrestic. sent3: there are allergic and legitimate things. sent4: something is not androgenic if the fact that it is both non-allergic and androgenic is not true. sent5: something does gear chattel and it is legitimate. sent6: something is not econometric. sent7: something does hypertrophy and it is a kind of a marsupial. sent8: if the candytuft is androgenic the littleneck is not catachrestic. sent9: the decumary is a kind of a hypertrophy. sent10: if the fact that something is not androgenic and is not allergic is not correct then it is a pier. sent11: that the littleneck is not allergic but it is androgenic is not true if the decumary is not a kind of a pier. sent12: if something is allergic it is a kind of a pier. sent13: there is something such that the fact that it gears fulsomeness hold. sent14: that something does legitimate hold. sent15: the candytuft is not catachrestic if the gynoecium legitimates. sent16: the littleneck is legitimate. sent17: there is something such that it is a kind of a marsupial. sent18: the decumary does gear chattel if a pier is econometric. sent19: something does gear chattel and is allergic. sent20: the snuffler is a kind of marsupial thing that is not a hypertrophy if the gynoecium does not legitimate. sent21: the candytuft is legitimate. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the gynoecium does legitimate.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the candytuft is not catachrestic.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: that the littleneck is not androgenic and it is not allergic is not right.; sent10 -> int4: if the fact that the littleneck is non-androgenic and it is not allergic is not right then it is a kind of a pier.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the littleneck is a pier.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the littleneck is econometric.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the littleneck is both a pier and econometric.; int6 -> int7: something is a pier and is econometric.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the decumary does gear chattel.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__