the fact that the denigration but not the linebacker happens is incorrect.
sent1: the denigration but not the linebacker happens if the acinarness does not occur. sent2: if the acinarness occurs and the Maundy happens then the distinguishing Seriphus does not occur. sent3: the fact that the sheltering cursed does not occur hold. sent4: the Maundy happens if not the sheltering cursed but the collision happens. sent5: not the sheltering cursed but the collision happens. sent6: the distinguishing dogbane occurs. sent7: the distinguishing Gurkha does not occur and the covertness does not occur. sent8: that the distinguishing Seriphus occurs and the distinguishing Bombax does not occur is caused by that the distinguishing Gurkha does not occur.
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the Maundy happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acinarness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the acinarness occurs and the Maundy occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the distinguishing Seriphus does not occur.; sent7 -> int4: the distinguishing Gurkha does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the distinguishing Seriphus occurs and the distinguishing Bombax does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the distinguishing Seriphus occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the acinarness does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
that the denigration occurs and the linebacker does not occur is incorrect.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the denigration but not the linebacker happens is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the denigration but not the linebacker happens if the acinarness does not occur. sent2: if the acinarness occurs and the Maundy happens then the distinguishing Seriphus does not occur. sent3: the fact that the sheltering cursed does not occur hold. sent4: the Maundy happens if not the sheltering cursed but the collision happens. sent5: not the sheltering cursed but the collision happens. sent6: the distinguishing dogbane occurs. sent7: the distinguishing Gurkha does not occur and the covertness does not occur. sent8: that the distinguishing Seriphus occurs and the distinguishing Bombax does not occur is caused by that the distinguishing Gurkha does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent5 -> int1: the Maundy happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acinarness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the acinarness occurs and the Maundy occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the distinguishing Seriphus does not occur.; sent7 -> int4: the distinguishing Gurkha does not occur.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the distinguishing Seriphus occurs and the distinguishing Bombax does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the distinguishing Seriphus occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the acinarness does not occur.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__