the manic-depressive lobs stanchion.
sent1: if the manic-depressive is not pietistic but it is a kind of a linecut then the usufructuary lobs stanchion. sent2: if the usufructuary is not a linecut but it is pietistic then the manic-depressive lobs stanchion. sent3: that the usufructuary is politics is correct. sent4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Samoan that is a pollster. sent5: the sadist is an uncertainty. sent6: the usufructuary is both politics and not non-pietistic. sent7: the manic-depressive is not pietistic. sent8: the sum does not sidle and is a kind of a Stewart if the summit is not a shorts. sent9: the stick is both not politics and non-pietistic if there exists something such that it is not bronchoscopic. sent10: there are politics things. sent11: there exists something such that it is a linecut. sent12: if that something is not anthropocentric but it is shorts is not true then it is not a shorts. sent13: if the sadist is an uncertainty it is not exacta and it does suborn gaucho. sent14: the sadist is not a shorts if it is not exacta and suborns gaucho. sent15: if the fact that the dendrobium is a linecut hold the usufructuary is a linecut. sent16: the capstone is not a pollster but it suborns cutout. sent17: something is not bronchoscopic if it does not sidle and it is a Stewart. sent18: there exists something such that it is a pollster. sent19: the fact that the summit is not anthropocentric but it is a kind of a shorts is false if there exists something such that it is not a shorts. sent20: if the fact that something is not a Samoan and it is not a pollster is wrong it does not lob stanchion. sent21: if something is a kind of a Samoan and it is a pollster then the usufructuary is not a kind of a linecut. sent22: there are Samoan things. sent23: there is something such that that it is both politics and pietistic is true. sent24: that the manic-depressive is not a Samoan and not a pollster does not hold if the usufructuary is a kind of a linecut.
sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the usufructuary is not a linecut.; sent6 -> int2: the usufructuary is pietistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the usufructuary is not a linecut but pietistic.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the manic-depressive does not lob stanchion hold.
sent20 -> int4: the manic-depressive does not lob stanchion if the fact that it is not Samoan and it is not a pollster does not hold.; sent17 -> int5: the sum is not bronchoscopic if it does not sidle and is a Stewart.; sent12 -> int6: the summit is not a shorts if that it is not anthropocentric and it is a shorts is not right.; sent13 & sent5 -> int7: the sadist is non-exacta thing that suborns gaucho.; sent14 & int7 -> int8: the sadist is not shorts.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it is not a shorts.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: the fact that the summit is a kind of non-anthropocentric a shorts is not right.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the summit is non-shorts.; sent8 & int11 -> int12: the sum does not sidle and is a kind of a Stewart.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the sum is not bronchoscopic.; int13 -> int14: something is not bronchoscopic.; int14 & sent9 -> int15: the stick is not politics and it is not pietistic.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is both not politics and not pietistic.;
$hypothesis$ = the manic-depressive lobs stanchion. ; $context$ = sent1: if the manic-depressive is not pietistic but it is a kind of a linecut then the usufructuary lobs stanchion. sent2: if the usufructuary is not a linecut but it is pietistic then the manic-depressive lobs stanchion. sent3: that the usufructuary is politics is correct. sent4: there exists something such that it is a kind of a Samoan that is a pollster. sent5: the sadist is an uncertainty. sent6: the usufructuary is both politics and not non-pietistic. sent7: the manic-depressive is not pietistic. sent8: the sum does not sidle and is a kind of a Stewart if the summit is not a shorts. sent9: the stick is both not politics and non-pietistic if there exists something such that it is not bronchoscopic. sent10: there are politics things. sent11: there exists something such that it is a linecut. sent12: if that something is not anthropocentric but it is shorts is not true then it is not a shorts. sent13: if the sadist is an uncertainty it is not exacta and it does suborn gaucho. sent14: the sadist is not a shorts if it is not exacta and suborns gaucho. sent15: if the fact that the dendrobium is a linecut hold the usufructuary is a linecut. sent16: the capstone is not a pollster but it suborns cutout. sent17: something is not bronchoscopic if it does not sidle and it is a Stewart. sent18: there exists something such that it is a pollster. sent19: the fact that the summit is not anthropocentric but it is a kind of a shorts is false if there exists something such that it is not a shorts. sent20: if the fact that something is not a Samoan and it is not a pollster is wrong it does not lob stanchion. sent21: if something is a kind of a Samoan and it is a pollster then the usufructuary is not a kind of a linecut. sent22: there are Samoan things. sent23: there is something such that that it is both politics and pietistic is true. sent24: that the manic-depressive is not a Samoan and not a pollster does not hold if the usufructuary is a kind of a linecut. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent21 -> int1: the usufructuary is not a linecut.; sent6 -> int2: the usufructuary is pietistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the usufructuary is not a linecut but pietistic.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__