the adhesiveness does not occur.
sent1: that both the sketching and the non-carboxylness happens prevents that the viticulture does not occur. sent2: the viticulture does not occur. sent3: the fact that not the sketch but the adhesive occurs does not hold if the carboxyl occurs. sent4: if the fact that not the sketch but the adhesiveness occurs is not right then the adhesiveness does not occur. sent5: the tutorial triggers that the adhesiveness occurs. sent6: the carboxylness does not occur. sent7: that the sketch does not occur yields that the tutorialness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sketching occurs.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the sketch but not the carboxylness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the viticulture occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sketch does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the tutorial happens.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the adhesive does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the adhesiveness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the sketching and the non-carboxylness happens prevents that the viticulture does not occur. sent2: the viticulture does not occur. sent3: the fact that not the sketch but the adhesive occurs does not hold if the carboxyl occurs. sent4: if the fact that not the sketch but the adhesiveness occurs is not right then the adhesiveness does not occur. sent5: the tutorial triggers that the adhesiveness occurs. sent6: the carboxylness does not occur. sent7: that the sketch does not occur yields that the tutorialness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sketching occurs.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the sketch but not the carboxylness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the viticulture occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sketch does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the tutorial happens.; int5 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__