the fact that the yashmak carbonates Lupinus hold.
sent1: something does not carbonate Lupinus if the fact that it does not carbonate rationale and is a kind of a Doberman is not true. sent2: the yashmak carbonates Lupinus if the fact that the blueprint is homeopathic is true. sent3: something is non-polymorphous if that it does not warm saponification and it does not warm mansion is not right. sent4: the slip is not a kind of a felony. sent5: something is gutsy and it is homeopathic if it does not carbonate Lupinus. sent6: if something is not polymorphous the fact that it does not carbonate rationale and is a Doberman is wrong. sent7: if the slip is not a felony the fact that the mansion does not carbonate Ederle and is not micropylar is false. sent8: if the mansion is gutsy then that the slip is not a felony and is not definite is not right. sent9: if the godmother is gutsy that the blueprint is homeopathic is not wrong. sent10: if the fact that the mansion does not carbonate Ederle and is not micropylar is false the godmother is gutsy.
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the mansion does not carbonate Ederle and it is not micropylar is not right.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the godmother is gutsy.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the blueprint is homeopathic.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the slip is not a felony and it is not definite does not hold.
sent5 -> int4: the mansion is gutsy and it is homeopathic if the fact that it does not carbonate Lupinus is true.; sent1 -> int5: if that the mansion does not carbonate rationale but it is a Doberman is not true then it does not carbonate Lupinus.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that that the mansion does not carbonate rationale but it is a Doberman is not right hold if it is not polymorphous.; sent3 -> int7: if that the mansion does not warm saponification and it does not warm mansion is incorrect it is not polymorphous.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the yashmak carbonates Lupinus hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not carbonate Lupinus if the fact that it does not carbonate rationale and is a kind of a Doberman is not true. sent2: the yashmak carbonates Lupinus if the fact that the blueprint is homeopathic is true. sent3: something is non-polymorphous if that it does not warm saponification and it does not warm mansion is not right. sent4: the slip is not a kind of a felony. sent5: something is gutsy and it is homeopathic if it does not carbonate Lupinus. sent6: if something is not polymorphous the fact that it does not carbonate rationale and is a Doberman is wrong. sent7: if the slip is not a felony the fact that the mansion does not carbonate Ederle and is not micropylar is false. sent8: if the mansion is gutsy then that the slip is not a felony and is not definite is not right. sent9: if the godmother is gutsy that the blueprint is homeopathic is not wrong. sent10: if the fact that the mansion does not carbonate Ederle and is not micropylar is false the godmother is gutsy. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the mansion does not carbonate Ederle and it is not micropylar is not right.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the godmother is gutsy.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the blueprint is homeopathic.; sent2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__