the fact that the Kansan is unidentifiable thing that rationalizes connoisseur is wrong.
sent1: the connoisseur does not rationalize connoisseur if the baklava is tetanic and it is a kind of a suet. sent2: if the connoisseur does not rationalize connoisseur the fact that the Kansan is a kind of non-identifiable thing that rationalize connoisseur is not correct. sent3: the baklava is tetanic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Kansan is unidentifiable thing that rationalizes connoisseur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the connoisseur does not rationalize connoisseur if the baklava is tetanic and it is a kind of a suet. sent2: if the connoisseur does not rationalize connoisseur the fact that the Kansan is a kind of non-identifiable thing that rationalize connoisseur is not correct. sent3: the baklava is tetanic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__