if the tongue does not reheat Sheraton the representation is psychopharmacological and it does insufflate okra.
sent1: the representation is not deficient and reheats Sheraton if the Zealot is psychopharmacological. sent2: the tongue is not deficient if the representation is a kind of non-deficient thing that reheats Sheraton. sent3: the representation is not non-psychopharmacological. sent4: there exists something such that it is eligible and it is not a rocket. sent5: the tongue reheats Sheraton if it does not shrimp. sent6: if the fact that the tongue is not intradermal but it is a kind of a teamwork is wrong then it is not a kind of a shrimp. sent7: the fact that the tongue is a teamwork is correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the tongue is not intradermal but it is a teamwork is false.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the tongue is not a shrimp.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the tongue does reheat Sheraton.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tongue does not reheat Sheraton.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the tongue is not intradermal but it is a kind of a teamwork.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not intradermal and is a teamwork.;
the tongue is not deficient and does tailgate elucidation.
$hypothesis$ = if the tongue does not reheat Sheraton the representation is psychopharmacological and it does insufflate okra. ; $context$ = sent1: the representation is not deficient and reheats Sheraton if the Zealot is psychopharmacological. sent2: the tongue is not deficient if the representation is a kind of non-deficient thing that reheats Sheraton. sent3: the representation is not non-psychopharmacological. sent4: there exists something such that it is eligible and it is not a rocket. sent5: the tongue reheats Sheraton if it does not shrimp. sent6: if the fact that the tongue is not intradermal but it is a kind of a teamwork is wrong then it is not a kind of a shrimp. sent7: the fact that the tongue is a teamwork is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the tongue is not intradermal but it is a teamwork is false.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: the tongue is not a shrimp.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the tongue does reheat Sheraton.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tongue does not reheat Sheraton.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the tongue is not intradermal but it is a kind of a teamwork.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not intradermal and is a teamwork.; __UNKNOWN__