the fact that the spindle is not a kind of a admixture is not incorrect.
sent1: something is a demonstrative if the fact that it is non-anarchistic thing that is not a kind of a Ignatius is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the husky does not measure praline but it is umbelliform is false then that the mamo measure praline is correct. sent3: if the spindle does not trundle skipjack and is a admixture then the husky measures praline. sent4: something does not deposit recital and/or does not measure praline if it is not umbelliform. sent5: if something does not deposit recital or does not measure praline or both then it does not measure praline. sent6: if the husky is non-umbelliform thing that does trundle skipjack the spindle deposits recital. sent7: the fact that something does not deposit recital and is not a kind of a Trinidadian is not right if it is a demonstrative. sent8: the sannup measures worst. sent9: something that is a admixture is not Parisian. sent10: that the mamo does not trundle Jason and does not measure worst is not right. sent11: if something does not deposit recital the fact that it does not measure praline and is umbelliform is wrong. sent12: if the mamo trundles skipjack the spindle is a admixture. sent13: the husky is a kind of a admixture if the mamo is not a kind of a admixture and trundles skipjack. sent14: the sannup is umbelliform if the fact that the passage does not deposit recital and it is not a Trinidadian is incorrect. sent15: if the spindle does not measure praline the mamo is not a admixture but it trundles skipjack. sent16: if the sannup is not Parisian then the husky is not umbelliform. sent17: the spindle does not trundle skipjack if the fact that the mamo does not trundle Jason and it does not measure worst is not correct. sent18: the sannup is not Parisian.
sent17 & sent10 -> int1: the spindle does not trundle skipjack.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spindle is a admixture.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the spindle does not trundle skipjack and is a admixture.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the husky measures praline.; sent5 -> int4: if the husky does not deposit recital and/or does not measure praline it does not measure praline.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the husky does not deposit recital and/or it does not measure praline is right if it is not umbelliform.; sent16 & sent18 -> int6: the husky is not umbelliform.; int5 & int6 -> int7: either the husky does not deposit recital or it does not measure praline or both.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the husky does not measure praline.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the spindle is a admixture.
sent11 -> int10: the fact that the husky does not measure praline but it is umbelliform does not hold if it does not deposit recital.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the spindle is not a kind of a admixture is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a demonstrative if the fact that it is non-anarchistic thing that is not a kind of a Ignatius is incorrect. sent2: if the fact that the husky does not measure praline but it is umbelliform is false then that the mamo measure praline is correct. sent3: if the spindle does not trundle skipjack and is a admixture then the husky measures praline. sent4: something does not deposit recital and/or does not measure praline if it is not umbelliform. sent5: if something does not deposit recital or does not measure praline or both then it does not measure praline. sent6: if the husky is non-umbelliform thing that does trundle skipjack the spindle deposits recital. sent7: the fact that something does not deposit recital and is not a kind of a Trinidadian is not right if it is a demonstrative. sent8: the sannup measures worst. sent9: something that is a admixture is not Parisian. sent10: that the mamo does not trundle Jason and does not measure worst is not right. sent11: if something does not deposit recital the fact that it does not measure praline and is umbelliform is wrong. sent12: if the mamo trundles skipjack the spindle is a admixture. sent13: the husky is a kind of a admixture if the mamo is not a kind of a admixture and trundles skipjack. sent14: the sannup is umbelliform if the fact that the passage does not deposit recital and it is not a Trinidadian is incorrect. sent15: if the spindle does not measure praline the mamo is not a admixture but it trundles skipjack. sent16: if the sannup is not Parisian then the husky is not umbelliform. sent17: the spindle does not trundle skipjack if the fact that the mamo does not trundle Jason and it does not measure worst is not correct. sent18: the sannup is not Parisian. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent10 -> int1: the spindle does not trundle skipjack.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spindle is a admixture.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the spindle does not trundle skipjack and is a admixture.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the husky measures praline.; sent5 -> int4: if the husky does not deposit recital and/or does not measure praline it does not measure praline.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the husky does not deposit recital and/or it does not measure praline is right if it is not umbelliform.; sent16 & sent18 -> int6: the husky is not umbelliform.; int5 & int6 -> int7: either the husky does not deposit recital or it does not measure praline or both.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the husky does not measure praline.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__