the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a Pipilo and does not hug Sturnidae does not hold it snuffles constitutionalist is incorrect.
sent1: something is a topaz if the fact that it is not a clue and is not a kind of a Mansi is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does not champion erosion and it is not a kind of a Brandt is incorrect it is stative. sent3: if the curator is a Pipilo it does snuffle constitutionalist. sent4: the curator snuffles constitutionalist if the fact that it is not a kind of a Pipilo and it does not hug Sturnidae does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a S.U.V. and does not hug pen-friend does not hold then it is a Mansi. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Pipilo and it does not hug Sturnidae then the fact that it does not snuffle constitutionalist does not hold. sent7: the curator does snuffle constitutionalist if it is not a kind of a Pipilo and it does not hug Sturnidae. sent8: there is something such that if it does hug Sturnidae then it does snuffle constitutionalist. sent9: if that something is not prosthodontics and it does not snuffle dinky is false then that it is a spoonerism hold. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Pipilo and it hugs Sturnidae is wrong it snuffles constitutionalist. sent11: the curator hugs Sturnidae if it snuffles chlorofluorocarbon. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a Pipilo it snuffles constitutionalist. sent13: there is something such that if it does not hug decarboxylase and it is not vicarial that it is chitinous is not incorrect. sent14: if the fact that the curator is not allylic and it is not astrocytic does not hold then it does hug Sturnidae. sent15: if the fact that the curator is not a Pipilo but it hugs Sturnidae does not hold then it does snuffle constitutionalist. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it does not hug envy and it is not a midsummer is not true it is a slipknot. sent17: there is something such that if that it reciprocates atavism and is not inhospitable is not true it hugs surrey. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Pipilo and does not hug Sturnidae is false then it snuffles constitutionalist. sent19: the yellowcake is a Pipilo if it is not a venter and it is not allylic. sent20: the curator is arithmetical if it is a kind of synergistic thing that does not reciprocate curator.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if that the fact that the caulk is not prosthodontics and does not snuffle dinky is correct does not hold it is a spoonerism.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a kind of a Pipilo and does not hug Sturnidae does not hold it snuffles constitutionalist is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a topaz if the fact that it is not a clue and is not a kind of a Mansi is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does not champion erosion and it is not a kind of a Brandt is incorrect it is stative. sent3: if the curator is a Pipilo it does snuffle constitutionalist. sent4: the curator snuffles constitutionalist if the fact that it is not a kind of a Pipilo and it does not hug Sturnidae does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a S.U.V. and does not hug pen-friend does not hold then it is a Mansi. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Pipilo and it does not hug Sturnidae then the fact that it does not snuffle constitutionalist does not hold. sent7: the curator does snuffle constitutionalist if it is not a kind of a Pipilo and it does not hug Sturnidae. sent8: there is something such that if it does hug Sturnidae then it does snuffle constitutionalist. sent9: if that something is not prosthodontics and it does not snuffle dinky is false then that it is a spoonerism hold. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a Pipilo and it hugs Sturnidae is wrong it snuffles constitutionalist. sent11: the curator hugs Sturnidae if it snuffles chlorofluorocarbon. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a Pipilo it snuffles constitutionalist. sent13: there is something such that if it does not hug decarboxylase and it is not vicarial that it is chitinous is not incorrect. sent14: if the fact that the curator is not allylic and it is not astrocytic does not hold then it does hug Sturnidae. sent15: if the fact that the curator is not a Pipilo but it hugs Sturnidae does not hold then it does snuffle constitutionalist. sent16: there is something such that if the fact that it does not hug envy and it is not a midsummer is not true it is a slipknot. sent17: there is something such that if that it reciprocates atavism and is not inhospitable is not true it hugs surrey. sent18: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Pipilo and does not hug Sturnidae is false then it snuffles constitutionalist. sent19: the yellowcake is a Pipilo if it is not a venter and it is not allylic. sent20: the curator is arithmetical if it is a kind of synergistic thing that does not reciprocate curator. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__