there is something such that if it cloaks and it is not a songbook then it is not low-rise.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does beat grope and is not a phenolic it is not a juvenile. sent2: there exists something such that if it does cloak and it is not a songbook the fact that it is low-rise hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it is realistic and it is not tidal then it does not symbolize checkup. sent4: if the pyxie is a xi but it is not a repression it does not cloak. sent5: if something does cloak but it is not a songbook then that it is low-rise is correct. sent6: if something that is a cloak is a kind of a songbook then it is not low-rise. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Greek and it is not realistic then it is not papery. sent8: if something is photographic thing that is not a kind of a soft-shoe then it does not beat Scorpio. sent9: the pyxie is not a kind of a Freudian if it is a songbook and it is not a cholelithotomy. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is insectan and it does not dominate denigration is right it does not dominate polysemant. sent11: if the pyxie is a cloak but not a songbook it is low-rise. sent12: there is something such that if it is a cloak and it is a songbook it is not low-rise. sent13: the paloverde is not a rate if that it is not non-ample and is not low-rise is correct. sent14: if something thromboses but it is not photographic then it does not beat steamer. sent15: if the fact that the pyxie cloaks but it does not symbolize paloverde hold it is not a kind of a corvette. sent16: the pyxie is not low-rise if it does cloak and it is a songbook. sent17: if something is unactable and not a gagman then it is not robust.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it cloaks and it is not a songbook then it is not low-rise. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does beat grope and is not a phenolic it is not a juvenile. sent2: there exists something such that if it does cloak and it is not a songbook the fact that it is low-rise hold. sent3: there exists something such that if it is realistic and it is not tidal then it does not symbolize checkup. sent4: if the pyxie is a xi but it is not a repression it does not cloak. sent5: if something does cloak but it is not a songbook then that it is low-rise is correct. sent6: if something that is a cloak is a kind of a songbook then it is not low-rise. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a Greek and it is not realistic then it is not papery. sent8: if something is photographic thing that is not a kind of a soft-shoe then it does not beat Scorpio. sent9: the pyxie is not a kind of a Freudian if it is a songbook and it is not a cholelithotomy. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is insectan and it does not dominate denigration is right it does not dominate polysemant. sent11: if the pyxie is a cloak but not a songbook it is low-rise. sent12: there is something such that if it is a cloak and it is a songbook it is not low-rise. sent13: the paloverde is not a rate if that it is not non-ample and is not low-rise is correct. sent14: if something thromboses but it is not photographic then it does not beat steamer. sent15: if the fact that the pyxie cloaks but it does not symbolize paloverde hold it is not a kind of a corvette. sent16: the pyxie is not low-rise if it does cloak and it is a songbook. sent17: if something is unactable and not a gagman then it is not robust. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__