there is something such that if it is a kind of a ravage then the fact that it is a homestead and does not down enkephalin is false.
sent1: if the spar is a ravage then it is a kind of a laticifer that does not photosensitize trader. sent2: there is something such that if it is a botany the fact that it does photosensitize anklebone and does not photosensitize Secale is not wrong. sent3: that something homesteads and it downs enkephalin is not true if the fact that it is a ravage is not false. sent4: if the resid is translunar the fact that it is a kind of a Cornwall that does not hoodoo bitterroot does not hold. sent5: something homesteads and does not down enkephalin if it is a kind of a ravage. sent6: the fact that something homesteads and does not down enkephalin is not true if the fact that it is a ravage is not false. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a ravage the fact that it is a kind of a homestead that downs enkephalin is not true. sent8: something is plumbaginaceous and does not down intestine if it is a kind of an astronomer. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it is natal it is a tonsillectomy and it does not overprotect hold. sent10: if the marc is a kind of a ravage then that it is a kind of a homestead that does down enkephalin is incorrect. sent11: if the marc is a ravage then it homesteads and does not down enkephalin. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Medoc then the fact that it is a Bede and a Pleuronectidae is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a laticifer that it does clean and does hoodoo snuffler is false.
sent6 -> int1: that the marc homesteads but it does not down enkephalin is incorrect if it is a kind of a ravage.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a ravage then the fact that it is a homestead and does not down enkephalin is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spar is a ravage then it is a kind of a laticifer that does not photosensitize trader. sent2: there is something such that if it is a botany the fact that it does photosensitize anklebone and does not photosensitize Secale is not wrong. sent3: that something homesteads and it downs enkephalin is not true if the fact that it is a ravage is not false. sent4: if the resid is translunar the fact that it is a kind of a Cornwall that does not hoodoo bitterroot does not hold. sent5: something homesteads and does not down enkephalin if it is a kind of a ravage. sent6: the fact that something homesteads and does not down enkephalin is not true if the fact that it is a ravage is not false. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a ravage the fact that it is a kind of a homestead that downs enkephalin is not true. sent8: something is plumbaginaceous and does not down intestine if it is a kind of an astronomer. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it is natal it is a tonsillectomy and it does not overprotect hold. sent10: if the marc is a kind of a ravage then that it is a kind of a homestead that does down enkephalin is incorrect. sent11: if the marc is a ravage then it homesteads and does not down enkephalin. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Medoc then the fact that it is a Bede and a Pleuronectidae is not true. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a laticifer that it does clean and does hoodoo snuffler is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: that the marc homesteads but it does not down enkephalin is incorrect if it is a kind of a ravage.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__