the grosbeak is not a kind of a pavlova.
sent1: if a unreactive thing reimburses protege then it is not a pavlova. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does not weld ethmoid and/or it does box is not correct then the gunwale is not radiopaque. sent3: if the pillwort is puritanical the roaster does not reimburse diatomite and destains wobbling. sent4: the evergreen is unreactive. sent5: if the isocyanate is not ovine and it does not destain bitthead the centrum does destain bitthead. sent6: the grosbeak is unreactive. sent7: that the fact that the diatomite does not weld ethmoid and/or boxes is not wrong does not hold if something destains wobbling. sent8: the ethmoid is a hindsight if the industrialist is non-woolen and is not a dower. sent9: the grosbeak is a kind of a pavlova and it is unreactive if the fact that the gusset does not reimburse protege is not false. sent10: the grosbeak is not viricidal. sent11: if something is a demonstrability then that it is puritanical is correct. sent12: the monad is unreactive. sent13: the industrialist is not woolen and it is not a dower if the centrum does destain bitthead. sent14: the pillwort is a spectrograph and it is a kind of a demonstrability. sent15: if the gunwale is not radiopaque the isocyanate is non-ovine thing that does not destain bitthead. sent16: the grosbeak reimburses protege. sent17: the grosbeak destains plaintiveness and it reimburses miniskirt. sent18: that if something is ametropic thing that is viricidal then it is unsuccessful hold. sent19: the gusset does not reimburse protege and it does not reimburse initial if the diapir hammers. sent20: The protege reimburses grosbeak. sent21: the fact that the pinprick is not a hammer but mayoral is not right if there is something such that it is a hindsight.
sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the grosbeak is unreactive and it reimburses protege.; sent1 -> int2: the grosbeak is not a kind of a pavlova if it is unreactive and it reimburses protege.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the grosbeak is a pavlova.
sent11 -> int3: the pillwort is puritanical if it is a kind of a demonstrability.; sent14 -> int4: the pillwort is a demonstrability.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pillwort is puritanical.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the roaster does not reimburse diatomite but it destains wobbling.; int6 -> int7: the roaster does destain wobbling.; int7 -> int8: something does destain wobbling.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the fact that the diatomite either does not weld ethmoid or is a boxed or both is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it does not weld ethmoid and/or does box is not true.; int10 & sent2 -> int11: the gunwale is not radiopaque.; sent15 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the isocyanate is not ovine and it does not destain bitthead is not wrong.; sent5 & int12 -> int13: the centrum does destain bitthead.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: the industrialist is both not woolen and not a dower.; sent8 & int14 -> int15: the ethmoid is a hindsight.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is a hindsight.; int16 & sent21 -> int17: the fact that the pinprick is not a kind of a hammer and is mayoral is incorrect.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that that it does not hammer and it is not non-mayoral is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the grosbeak is not a kind of a pavlova. ; $context$ = sent1: if a unreactive thing reimburses protege then it is not a pavlova. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it does not weld ethmoid and/or it does box is not correct then the gunwale is not radiopaque. sent3: if the pillwort is puritanical the roaster does not reimburse diatomite and destains wobbling. sent4: the evergreen is unreactive. sent5: if the isocyanate is not ovine and it does not destain bitthead the centrum does destain bitthead. sent6: the grosbeak is unreactive. sent7: that the fact that the diatomite does not weld ethmoid and/or boxes is not wrong does not hold if something destains wobbling. sent8: the ethmoid is a hindsight if the industrialist is non-woolen and is not a dower. sent9: the grosbeak is a kind of a pavlova and it is unreactive if the fact that the gusset does not reimburse protege is not false. sent10: the grosbeak is not viricidal. sent11: if something is a demonstrability then that it is puritanical is correct. sent12: the monad is unreactive. sent13: the industrialist is not woolen and it is not a dower if the centrum does destain bitthead. sent14: the pillwort is a spectrograph and it is a kind of a demonstrability. sent15: if the gunwale is not radiopaque the isocyanate is non-ovine thing that does not destain bitthead. sent16: the grosbeak reimburses protege. sent17: the grosbeak destains plaintiveness and it reimburses miniskirt. sent18: that if something is ametropic thing that is viricidal then it is unsuccessful hold. sent19: the gusset does not reimburse protege and it does not reimburse initial if the diapir hammers. sent20: The protege reimburses grosbeak. sent21: the fact that the pinprick is not a hammer but mayoral is not right if there is something such that it is a hindsight. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent16 -> int1: the grosbeak is unreactive and it reimburses protege.; sent1 -> int2: the grosbeak is not a kind of a pavlova if it is unreactive and it reimburses protege.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__