there is something such that if it is evolutionary that it does not hash explicitness and it is non-firmamental is right.
sent1: the amoralist does not hash explicitness if it is evolutionary. sent2: there exists something such that if it is evolutionary it hashes explicitness and it is not firmamental. sent3: there exists something such that if it is evolutionary then it does not hash explicitness and is firmamental. sent4: there exists something such that if it does confederate spirituality then it does not lie and it is not an attendant. sent5: there is something such that if it is evolutionary then it does not hash explicitness. sent6: if the amoralist is evolutionary it does not hash explicitness and it is firmamental. sent7: there is something such that if it is evolutionary then it is not firmamental. sent8: something is not neonatal and does not oppose bodied if it is a gratitude. sent9: there exists something such that if it is disintegrative then that it is not a redshank is true. sent10: something is intelligible thing that is not a tubule if it is firmamental. sent11: the amoralist does not hash explicitness and it is non-firmamental if it is evolutionary. sent12: the ant is not a veil and it does not accord homeboy if it is firmamental.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
the amoralist is intelligible and not a tubule if the fact that it is not non-firmamental is right.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is evolutionary that it does not hash explicitness and it is non-firmamental is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the amoralist does not hash explicitness if it is evolutionary. sent2: there exists something such that if it is evolutionary it hashes explicitness and it is not firmamental. sent3: there exists something such that if it is evolutionary then it does not hash explicitness and is firmamental. sent4: there exists something such that if it does confederate spirituality then it does not lie and it is not an attendant. sent5: there is something such that if it is evolutionary then it does not hash explicitness. sent6: if the amoralist is evolutionary it does not hash explicitness and it is firmamental. sent7: there is something such that if it is evolutionary then it is not firmamental. sent8: something is not neonatal and does not oppose bodied if it is a gratitude. sent9: there exists something such that if it is disintegrative then that it is not a redshank is true. sent10: something is intelligible thing that is not a tubule if it is firmamental. sent11: the amoralist does not hash explicitness and it is non-firmamental if it is evolutionary. sent12: the ant is not a veil and it does not accord homeboy if it is firmamental. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__