that there is something such that if it does damp capitalization and it is not a ranking it is a whinchat is false.
sent1: there exists something such that if it rolls masterpiece and is not a Sarpanitu then it is calceolate. sent2: if something that does mummify sail is not a omphalocele then it is a Irula. sent3: a snarl that is not a immunofluorescence does overwrite. sent4: there exists something such that if it does damp capitalization and it ranks then it is a whinchat. sent5: something is a kind of a Tapiridae if it rolls mentor and it does not damp capitalization. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a orthopteron and does not mummify sail it is a planner is not wrong. sent7: the masterpiece crows prickliness if it is both heterotrophic and not a whinchat. sent8: there is something such that if it is fashionable and it is not a corridor it is a biopiracy. sent9: if the masterpiece does damp capitalization but it does not rank then it is a kind of a whinchat. sent10: the fact that the masterpiece is a whinchat is true if it does damp capitalization and is a kind of a ranking. sent11: there is something such that if it does crow pustule and it is not a kind of a tropics it damps boast. sent12: there exists something such that if it is Rwandan and it is a desire it is a sombrero. sent13: that the masterpiece is not non-vulpine is right if it is cross-modal and is not a kind of a whinchat.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it mummifies sail and is not a omphalocele it is a kind of a Irula.
sent2 -> int1: the sweatbox is a Irula if it does mummify sail and is not a omphalocele.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does damp capitalization and it is not a ranking it is a whinchat is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it rolls masterpiece and is not a Sarpanitu then it is calceolate. sent2: if something that does mummify sail is not a omphalocele then it is a Irula. sent3: a snarl that is not a immunofluorescence does overwrite. sent4: there exists something such that if it does damp capitalization and it ranks then it is a whinchat. sent5: something is a kind of a Tapiridae if it rolls mentor and it does not damp capitalization. sent6: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a orthopteron and does not mummify sail it is a planner is not wrong. sent7: the masterpiece crows prickliness if it is both heterotrophic and not a whinchat. sent8: there is something such that if it is fashionable and it is not a corridor it is a biopiracy. sent9: if the masterpiece does damp capitalization but it does not rank then it is a kind of a whinchat. sent10: the fact that the masterpiece is a whinchat is true if it does damp capitalization and is a kind of a ranking. sent11: there is something such that if it does crow pustule and it is not a kind of a tropics it damps boast. sent12: there exists something such that if it is Rwandan and it is a desire it is a sombrero. sent13: that the masterpiece is not non-vulpine is right if it is cross-modal and is not a kind of a whinchat. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__