if the winker is a Ancylidae the stencil does not risk thaneship.
sent1: the Nazification is a IRS. sent2: the hackberry is not a IRS. sent3: the stencil is a IRS and it commands counterweight. sent4: the stencil risks polymerization. sent5: the winker does risk thaneship. sent6: the stitch is a IRS if the stencil does exclaim and it does risk thaneship. sent7: something does not exclaim and it is not a IRS if it is a enology. sent8: if the stitch risks thaneship then the stencil is a IRS. sent9: the stitch does not risk thaneship. sent10: the rail-splitter is ample thing that risks abrasion. sent11: the stitch does not exclaim. sent12: the stencil risks thaneship if the winker is a Ancylidae and is a enology. sent13: if the fact that the stitch does not exclaim is correct then it is not a IRS. sent14: the stencil is not a Ancylidae. sent15: the winker is a kind of a participation. sent16: the stitch is not a kind of a enology if the winker is a IRS and exclaims. sent17: the dormouse is both a squawk and a diagnostician. sent18: the stencil risks thaneship if the winker is a kind of a Ancylidae. sent19: the stencil risks thaneship. sent20: the stencil risks thaneship and it is a IRS. sent21: if the stitch is not a kind of a IRS that the winker is a kind of a enology hold. sent22: the winker does not risk thaneship if the fact that the stencil is a Ancylidae is correct. sent23: if the stitch is a Ancylidae then the winker is not a IRS. sent24: if the winker is a Ancylidae and a enology that the stencil does not risk thaneship is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winker is a kind of a Ancylidae.; sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the stitch is not a IRS.; sent21 & int1 -> int2: the winker is a enology.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the winker is a Ancylidae and it is a kind of a enology.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the stencil does not risk thaneship.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the stonefly is not a kind of a Ancylidae.
sent7 -> int5: the stitch does not exclaim and it is not a IRS if it is a enology.;
$hypothesis$ = if the winker is a Ancylidae the stencil does not risk thaneship. ; $context$ = sent1: the Nazification is a IRS. sent2: the hackberry is not a IRS. sent3: the stencil is a IRS and it commands counterweight. sent4: the stencil risks polymerization. sent5: the winker does risk thaneship. sent6: the stitch is a IRS if the stencil does exclaim and it does risk thaneship. sent7: something does not exclaim and it is not a IRS if it is a enology. sent8: if the stitch risks thaneship then the stencil is a IRS. sent9: the stitch does not risk thaneship. sent10: the rail-splitter is ample thing that risks abrasion. sent11: the stitch does not exclaim. sent12: the stencil risks thaneship if the winker is a Ancylidae and is a enology. sent13: if the fact that the stitch does not exclaim is correct then it is not a IRS. sent14: the stencil is not a Ancylidae. sent15: the winker is a kind of a participation. sent16: the stitch is not a kind of a enology if the winker is a IRS and exclaims. sent17: the dormouse is both a squawk and a diagnostician. sent18: the stencil risks thaneship if the winker is a kind of a Ancylidae. sent19: the stencil risks thaneship. sent20: the stencil risks thaneship and it is a IRS. sent21: if the stitch is not a kind of a IRS that the winker is a kind of a enology hold. sent22: the winker does not risk thaneship if the fact that the stencil is a Ancylidae is correct. sent23: if the stitch is a Ancylidae then the winker is not a IRS. sent24: if the winker is a Ancylidae and a enology that the stencil does not risk thaneship is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winker is a kind of a Ancylidae.; sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the stitch is not a IRS.; sent21 & int1 -> int2: the winker is a enology.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the winker is a Ancylidae and it is a kind of a enology.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the stencil does not risk thaneship.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__