both the heartlessness and the non-pictographicness happens.
sent1: if that that the Methodists but not the rejoicing occurs hold is incorrect then the rivaling Teucrium does not occur. sent2: the boronicness happens. sent3: that the fact that the commutating administration and the non-implicitness happens does not hold if the sedition does not occur is right. sent4: the boronicness and the hopscotch occurs. sent5: if that the commutating administration but not the implicitness occurs is not correct then the venesection does not occur. sent6: that the venesection does not occur is prevented by that the mint occurs. sent7: that the sedition and the hopscotch happens prevents the sway. sent8: that the sway does not occur prevents the pictographicness. sent9: the mint occurs. sent10: if the sway does not occur the heartlessness and the non-pictographicness happens. sent11: that the venesection does not occur is brought about by that the commutating administration does not occur. sent12: that the sedition but not the venesection occurs yields that the unerectness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sedition does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the commutating administration happens but the implicitness does not occur is not right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the venesection does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int3: the venesection occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sedition happens.; sent4 -> int6: the hopscotch occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sedition and the hopscotch occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the sway does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the unerectness happens.
$hypothesis$ = both the heartlessness and the non-pictographicness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that the Methodists but not the rejoicing occurs hold is incorrect then the rivaling Teucrium does not occur. sent2: the boronicness happens. sent3: that the fact that the commutating administration and the non-implicitness happens does not hold if the sedition does not occur is right. sent4: the boronicness and the hopscotch occurs. sent5: if that the commutating administration but not the implicitness occurs is not correct then the venesection does not occur. sent6: that the venesection does not occur is prevented by that the mint occurs. sent7: that the sedition and the hopscotch happens prevents the sway. sent8: that the sway does not occur prevents the pictographicness. sent9: the mint occurs. sent10: if the sway does not occur the heartlessness and the non-pictographicness happens. sent11: that the venesection does not occur is brought about by that the commutating administration does not occur. sent12: that the sedition but not the venesection occurs yields that the unerectness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sedition does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the commutating administration happens but the implicitness does not occur is not right.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the venesection does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int3: the venesection occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the sedition happens.; sent4 -> int6: the hopscotch occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sedition and the hopscotch occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the sway does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__