the fact that there is something such that that it is isentropic and it is a kind of an assertiveness is not true is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the cattle is a popularizer that is not Zolaesque does not hold if there exists something such that it is Zolaesque. sent2: the egret is Zolaesque. sent3: that something is morbilliform and it does rebel does not hold if it does not kibitz. sent4: there is nothing that is isentropic thing that is an assertiveness. sent5: there is something such that that it is both bare and female is wrong. sent6: the fact that the tumbler does scrabble and is isentropic does not hold. sent7: the peridotite is not a popularizer if that the cattle is a popularizer but not Zolaesque is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a popularizer then it is a farmerette. sent9: there exists nothing that is centralist and a plant. sent10: if the phloem is morbilliform the mannequin does not kibitz. sent11: that the rowan is unpaid and consternates rundle does not hold. sent12: a farmerette is morbilliform. sent13: there is nothing such that it is clerical and it is a kind of a female. sent14: that the radish is a kind of a earliness and it is a kind of an assertiveness is false. sent15: if the peridotite is morbilliform the phloem is morbilliform. sent16: something is not a farmerette and does not kibitz if it is a popularizer.
sent4 -> int1: that the radish is isentropic and an assertiveness is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it is morbilliform thing that rebels is not right.
sent3 -> int2: if the rundle does not kibitz that it is morbilliform and does rebel does not hold.; sent16 -> int3: the mannequin is not a farmerette and it does not kibitz if it is a popularizer.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that that it is isentropic and it is a kind of an assertiveness is not true is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cattle is a popularizer that is not Zolaesque does not hold if there exists something such that it is Zolaesque. sent2: the egret is Zolaesque. sent3: that something is morbilliform and it does rebel does not hold if it does not kibitz. sent4: there is nothing that is isentropic thing that is an assertiveness. sent5: there is something such that that it is both bare and female is wrong. sent6: the fact that the tumbler does scrabble and is isentropic does not hold. sent7: the peridotite is not a popularizer if that the cattle is a popularizer but not Zolaesque is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a popularizer then it is a farmerette. sent9: there exists nothing that is centralist and a plant. sent10: if the phloem is morbilliform the mannequin does not kibitz. sent11: that the rowan is unpaid and consternates rundle does not hold. sent12: a farmerette is morbilliform. sent13: there is nothing such that it is clerical and it is a kind of a female. sent14: that the radish is a kind of a earliness and it is a kind of an assertiveness is false. sent15: if the peridotite is morbilliform the phloem is morbilliform. sent16: something is not a farmerette and does not kibitz if it is a popularizer. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the radish is isentropic and an assertiveness is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__