that both the non-relativeness and the squawking occurs is right.
sent1: if the humiliation does not occur the adventitialness does not occur and the cochlearness does not occur. sent2: if the adventitialness happens then the cochlearness happens. sent3: if the fact that the cochlearness does not occur does not hold then the fact that not the relativeness but the squawk occurs is false. sent4: if the cloistering Planococcus occurs then the scissoring does not occur and the stoking indumentum occurs. sent5: the fact that the relativeness occurs and the squawking happens is not correct. sent6: the unquestionableness does not occur. sent7: the mammalianness prevents that the cloistering Planococcus does not occur. sent8: if the run-onness occurs not the relative but the squawk happens. sent9: that the run-onness does not occur hold. sent10: if the cochlearness occurs then the fact that the relativeness and the squawk occurs is not right. sent11: if the non-run-onness and the questionableness occurs then the adventitialness occurs. sent12: that the scissoring does not occur but the stoking indumentum occurs prevents the humiliation. sent13: the mammalianness occurs if the transmuting happens.
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: both the non-run-onness and the non-unquestionableness occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the adventitialness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the cochlearness occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the relativeness does not occur and the squawk occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that both the non-relativeness and the squawking occurs is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the humiliation does not occur the adventitialness does not occur and the cochlearness does not occur. sent2: if the adventitialness happens then the cochlearness happens. sent3: if the fact that the cochlearness does not occur does not hold then the fact that not the relativeness but the squawk occurs is false. sent4: if the cloistering Planococcus occurs then the scissoring does not occur and the stoking indumentum occurs. sent5: the fact that the relativeness occurs and the squawking happens is not correct. sent6: the unquestionableness does not occur. sent7: the mammalianness prevents that the cloistering Planococcus does not occur. sent8: if the run-onness occurs not the relative but the squawk happens. sent9: that the run-onness does not occur hold. sent10: if the cochlearness occurs then the fact that the relativeness and the squawk occurs is not right. sent11: if the non-run-onness and the questionableness occurs then the adventitialness occurs. sent12: that the scissoring does not occur but the stoking indumentum occurs prevents the humiliation. sent13: the mammalianness occurs if the transmuting happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent6 -> int1: both the non-run-onness and the non-unquestionableness occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the adventitialness occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the cochlearness occurs.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__