the fact that the embassy is a windfall if the geneticist communicates is not right.
sent1: something is a kind of a wetland if it reads neutrality and it does not coach sleepwalker. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not communicate and is calcicolous does not hold then the lambskin does communicate. sent3: if something is not a kind of a wetland and is not a windfall then the fact that it is calcicolous is correct. sent4: if the sleepwalker is not calcicolous then the moment either does sponge or does overlap or both. sent5: if the geneticist does communicate and is a wetland the sleepwalker is not calcicolous. sent6: the geneticist corkscrews prebendary. sent7: if either the moment sponges or it is not an overlap or both then the embassy is a windfall. sent8: that the geneticist does not smell tuning is right. sent9: if the embassy does not overlap the moment is a windfall. sent10: the geneticist does not read neutrality and does not coach sleepwalker if the fact that it does not smell tuning is not false. sent11: if something that does not read neutrality does not coach sleepwalker then it is a kind of a wetland. sent12: if the lidar is a kind of a playtime and is not a wetland then it does camouflage. sent13: if the embassy is a windfall or it does not smell tuning or both then the geneticist is a kind of a wetland. sent14: the moment either sponges or overlaps or both. sent15: the moment is a sponge and/or it is not an overlap if that the sleepwalker is not calcicolous is true. sent16: the embassy does not read lobed and is not an overlap. sent17: That the tuning does not smell geneticist is right.
sent11 -> int1: if that the geneticist does not read neutrality and it does not coach sleepwalker is correct it is a wetland.; sent10 & sent8 -> int2: the geneticist does not read neutrality and it does not coach sleepwalker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the geneticist is a wetland.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the geneticist communicates is right.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the geneticist does communicate and is a wetland.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the sleepwalker is not calcicolous.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: either the moment is a sponge or it does not overlap or both.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the embassy is a windfall.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the lambskin is not a sponge.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the embassy is a windfall if the geneticist communicates is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a wetland if it reads neutrality and it does not coach sleepwalker. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not communicate and is calcicolous does not hold then the lambskin does communicate. sent3: if something is not a kind of a wetland and is not a windfall then the fact that it is calcicolous is correct. sent4: if the sleepwalker is not calcicolous then the moment either does sponge or does overlap or both. sent5: if the geneticist does communicate and is a wetland the sleepwalker is not calcicolous. sent6: the geneticist corkscrews prebendary. sent7: if either the moment sponges or it is not an overlap or both then the embassy is a windfall. sent8: that the geneticist does not smell tuning is right. sent9: if the embassy does not overlap the moment is a windfall. sent10: the geneticist does not read neutrality and does not coach sleepwalker if the fact that it does not smell tuning is not false. sent11: if something that does not read neutrality does not coach sleepwalker then it is a kind of a wetland. sent12: if the lidar is a kind of a playtime and is not a wetland then it does camouflage. sent13: if the embassy is a windfall or it does not smell tuning or both then the geneticist is a kind of a wetland. sent14: the moment either sponges or overlaps or both. sent15: the moment is a sponge and/or it is not an overlap if that the sleepwalker is not calcicolous is true. sent16: the embassy does not read lobed and is not an overlap. sent17: That the tuning does not smell geneticist is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if that the geneticist does not read neutrality and it does not coach sleepwalker is correct it is a wetland.; sent10 & sent8 -> int2: the geneticist does not read neutrality and it does not coach sleepwalker.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the geneticist is a wetland.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the geneticist communicates is right.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the geneticist does communicate and is a wetland.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the sleepwalker is not calcicolous.; int5 & sent15 -> int6: either the moment is a sponge or it does not overlap or both.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the embassy is a windfall.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__