that the skinny-dip does not occur triggers that the TPN does not occur but the low-levelness happens.
sent1: if the TPN occurs that the inaccessibleness and the non-pentatonicness occurs is not right. sent2: that the TPN does not occur and the low-levelness happens is triggered by that the skinny-dip happens. sent3: that the Tasmanianness does not occur but the spread occurs is caused by that the hilarness does not occur. sent4: the low-levelness and the toasting happens if the spreading does not occur. sent5: the skinny-dip happens if the fact that the inaccessibleness but not the pentatonicness happens is incorrect. sent6: the toasting occurs. sent7: if the fact that the pentatonicness happens hold the skinny-dip happens. sent8: that the toasting occurs brings about that the compartmentalizing tablet does not occur and the skinny-dip does not occur. sent9: that the fact that both the inaccessibleness and the pentatonicness happens is true is wrong if the TPN happens. sent10: the Tasmanianness happens but the spread does not occur. sent11: the Tasmanianness happens. sent12: the toasting is caused by that the spread does not occur. sent13: the intumescing occurs and the repeat happens if the darts does not occur. sent14: the intumescing leads to that the toasting occurs. sent15: the darts does not occur. sent16: the fact that that the inaccessibleness occurs and the pentatonicness occurs hold is wrong. sent17: if the Caliphate happens then the mealiness does not occur but the clockwiseness occurs. sent18: if the Tasmanianness does not occur but the spreading occurs the low-levelness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the TPN occurs.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that both the inaccessibleness and the non-pentatonicness occurs is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the skinny-dip happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skinny-diping does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the TPN does not occur.; sent10 -> int5: the spreading does not occur.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that both the low-levelness and the toasting happens hold.; int6 -> int7: the low-levelness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the TPN does not occur and the low-levelness happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
not the compartmentalizing tablet but the receivership happens.
sent13 & sent15 -> int9: both the intumescing and the repeat happens.; int9 -> int10: the intumescing happens.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the toasting occurs.; sent8 & int11 -> int12: the compartmentalizing tablet does not occur and the skinny-dip does not occur.; int12 -> int13: the compartmentalizing tablet does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = that the skinny-dip does not occur triggers that the TPN does not occur but the low-levelness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the TPN occurs that the inaccessibleness and the non-pentatonicness occurs is not right. sent2: that the TPN does not occur and the low-levelness happens is triggered by that the skinny-dip happens. sent3: that the Tasmanianness does not occur but the spread occurs is caused by that the hilarness does not occur. sent4: the low-levelness and the toasting happens if the spreading does not occur. sent5: the skinny-dip happens if the fact that the inaccessibleness but not the pentatonicness happens is incorrect. sent6: the toasting occurs. sent7: if the fact that the pentatonicness happens hold the skinny-dip happens. sent8: that the toasting occurs brings about that the compartmentalizing tablet does not occur and the skinny-dip does not occur. sent9: that the fact that both the inaccessibleness and the pentatonicness happens is true is wrong if the TPN happens. sent10: the Tasmanianness happens but the spread does not occur. sent11: the Tasmanianness happens. sent12: the toasting is caused by that the spread does not occur. sent13: the intumescing occurs and the repeat happens if the darts does not occur. sent14: the intumescing leads to that the toasting occurs. sent15: the darts does not occur. sent16: the fact that that the inaccessibleness occurs and the pentatonicness occurs hold is wrong. sent17: if the Caliphate happens then the mealiness does not occur but the clockwiseness occurs. sent18: if the Tasmanianness does not occur but the spreading occurs the low-levelness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the TPN occurs.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that both the inaccessibleness and the non-pentatonicness occurs is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the skinny-dip happens is correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skinny-diping does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the TPN does not occur.; sent10 -> int5: the spreading does not occur.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that both the low-levelness and the toasting happens hold.; int6 -> int7: the low-levelness happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the TPN does not occur and the low-levelness happens.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__