there exists something such that if it does not cutinize and is not a discharge then it is not typographic.
sent1: something does oblige if it is not exculpatory and is not hair-shirt. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not bargain Meccano and it is not a kind of a Kahlua then it is psychometric. sent3: if the jaw is not typographic and it is not physiotherapeutic then that it is not parotid is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is spatial and it is not a gavotte then it is not a sugarberry. sent5: if the clerestory is a odist and does not cutinize that it does not gripe helix is not wrong. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not cutinize and it is a discharge then it is not typographic. sent7: if the clerestory does not cutinize and does not discharge then the fact that it is typographic is correct.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not cutinize and is not a discharge then it is not typographic. ; $context$ = sent1: something does oblige if it is not exculpatory and is not hair-shirt. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not bargain Meccano and it is not a kind of a Kahlua then it is psychometric. sent3: if the jaw is not typographic and it is not physiotherapeutic then that it is not parotid is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is spatial and it is not a gavotte then it is not a sugarberry. sent5: if the clerestory is a odist and does not cutinize that it does not gripe helix is not wrong. sent6: there exists something such that if it does not cutinize and it is a discharge then it is not typographic. sent7: if the clerestory does not cutinize and does not discharge then the fact that it is typographic is correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__