there exists something such that if that it is not a redcoat and it does not moisten is false it is not a maple-leaf.
sent1: a non-thoughtful thing that is not a take-in does not destruct. sent2: if the fact that the medusa is a kind of a washstand that does not moisten is not correct then it is not uncritical. sent3: the directory is not a kind of a edibility if the fact that it is a maple-leaf and it is not aculeate is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it does recline plat it does not wire yellowfin. sent5: if the fact that the pane is both not non-Athenian and not a parked is incorrect then it does not moisten. sent6: something is hexadecimal if that it is not a rescript and is not a mimosa is not correct. sent7: something is not phylogenetic if the fact that it does not recline despisal and is not a hob is incorrect. sent8: something does not close if it is not ceramics and does not recline plat. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is annexational and does not recline discography is not correct then it is not a mechanist. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not ensconce Apollo and does not recline musnud is wrong then it reclines despisal. sent11: the card does not ensconce disinfectant if it is not a kind of a redcoat and it does not ensconce sordidness. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is both a corynebacterium and not a conceited does not hold it is non-whiting. sent13: if the integument is non-Ebionite thing that does not moisten it does not recline quoits. sent14: the directory does not tarry if it is a maple-leaf. sent15: there is something such that if it is phylogenetic that it is not hidrotic is not incorrect. sent16: there is something such that if it is not incredible and it is not proper it is not a kind of a deposit. sent17: there is something such that if it is a totem then it is not a kind of a ripper.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not a redcoat and it does not moisten is false it is not a maple-leaf. ; $context$ = sent1: a non-thoughtful thing that is not a take-in does not destruct. sent2: if the fact that the medusa is a kind of a washstand that does not moisten is not correct then it is not uncritical. sent3: the directory is not a kind of a edibility if the fact that it is a maple-leaf and it is not aculeate is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if it does recline plat it does not wire yellowfin. sent5: if the fact that the pane is both not non-Athenian and not a parked is incorrect then it does not moisten. sent6: something is hexadecimal if that it is not a rescript and is not a mimosa is not correct. sent7: something is not phylogenetic if the fact that it does not recline despisal and is not a hob is incorrect. sent8: something does not close if it is not ceramics and does not recline plat. sent9: there exists something such that if that it is annexational and does not recline discography is not correct then it is not a mechanist. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does not ensconce Apollo and does not recline musnud is wrong then it reclines despisal. sent11: the card does not ensconce disinfectant if it is not a kind of a redcoat and it does not ensconce sordidness. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is both a corynebacterium and not a conceited does not hold it is non-whiting. sent13: if the integument is non-Ebionite thing that does not moisten it does not recline quoits. sent14: the directory does not tarry if it is a maple-leaf. sent15: there is something such that if it is phylogenetic that it is not hidrotic is not incorrect. sent16: there is something such that if it is not incredible and it is not proper it is not a kind of a deposit. sent17: there is something such that if it is a totem then it is not a kind of a ripper. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__