the fact that the barbwire is a zymology and is a kind of a least is incorrect.
sent1: the fire-wheel permits hitch. sent2: the barbwire is not a wit. sent3: the barbwire is a hap. sent4: the fire-wheel is polymorphous. sent5: the barbwire is a kind of a zymology if the fire-wheel does permit hitch. sent6: there is something such that it does permit hitch. sent7: if that the fire-wheel is least hold then it is a credulousness. sent8: if the barbwire is a kind of polymorphous thing that is a wit then it does permit cynosure. sent9: something interpolates brooklime. sent10: the barbwire is a hibachi. sent11: if something does interpolate brooklime the barbwire is not a wit. sent12: the fact that if there exists something such that it is a vogue then the fire-wheel looks Interpol and is not anemophilous is right. sent13: the fire-wheel is a soldiery. sent14: the barbwire does permit hitch if it is a wit and it does not permit cynosure. sent15: if the barbwire is a kind of a harasser then it is a least. sent16: something is not non-polymorphous or not a zymology or both if it does interpolate brooklime. sent17: the barbwire permits hitch if it is a least. sent18: the barbwire is polymorphous but it is not a wit if there is something such that the fact that it does interpolate brooklime is not wrong. sent19: if something is polymorphous and not a wit then that it permits cynosure is not wrong. sent20: the fire-wheel is not a zymology if there is something such that it is polymorphous or it is not a kind of a zymology or both. sent21: the fire-wheel does permit hitch if the fact that it is a kind of a zymology that is non-least hold. sent22: the fire-wheel is a wit. sent23: if something that is polymorphous is a wit it does permit cynosure. sent24: the fire-wheel is atomistic. sent25: The hitch permits fire-wheel. sent26: the barbwire is a harasser if that it does permit cynosure is true.
sent9 & sent18 -> int1: the barbwire is polymorphous but it is not a wit.; sent19 -> int2: the barbwire permits cynosure if it is polymorphous thing that is not a wit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the barbwire does not permit cynosure is not true.; int3 & sent26 -> int4: the barbwire is a kind of a harasser.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the barbwire is a kind of a least.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: the barbwire is a kind of a zymology.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the barbwire is a zymology and it is a least is false.
sent16 -> int7: if the Hokan interpolates brooklime it is not non-polymorphous and/or it is not a zymology.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the barbwire is a zymology and is a kind of a least is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fire-wheel permits hitch. sent2: the barbwire is not a wit. sent3: the barbwire is a hap. sent4: the fire-wheel is polymorphous. sent5: the barbwire is a kind of a zymology if the fire-wheel does permit hitch. sent6: there is something such that it does permit hitch. sent7: if that the fire-wheel is least hold then it is a credulousness. sent8: if the barbwire is a kind of polymorphous thing that is a wit then it does permit cynosure. sent9: something interpolates brooklime. sent10: the barbwire is a hibachi. sent11: if something does interpolate brooklime the barbwire is not a wit. sent12: the fact that if there exists something such that it is a vogue then the fire-wheel looks Interpol and is not anemophilous is right. sent13: the fire-wheel is a soldiery. sent14: the barbwire does permit hitch if it is a wit and it does not permit cynosure. sent15: if the barbwire is a kind of a harasser then it is a least. sent16: something is not non-polymorphous or not a zymology or both if it does interpolate brooklime. sent17: the barbwire permits hitch if it is a least. sent18: the barbwire is polymorphous but it is not a wit if there is something such that the fact that it does interpolate brooklime is not wrong. sent19: if something is polymorphous and not a wit then that it permits cynosure is not wrong. sent20: the fire-wheel is not a zymology if there is something such that it is polymorphous or it is not a kind of a zymology or both. sent21: the fire-wheel does permit hitch if the fact that it is a kind of a zymology that is non-least hold. sent22: the fire-wheel is a wit. sent23: if something that is polymorphous is a wit it does permit cynosure. sent24: the fire-wheel is atomistic. sent25: The hitch permits fire-wheel. sent26: the barbwire is a harasser if that it does permit cynosure is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent18 -> int1: the barbwire is polymorphous but it is not a wit.; sent19 -> int2: the barbwire permits cynosure if it is polymorphous thing that is not a wit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the barbwire does not permit cynosure is not true.; int3 & sent26 -> int4: the barbwire is a kind of a harasser.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the barbwire is a kind of a least.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: the barbwire is a kind of a zymology.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__