the percolation is a Salinger.
sent1: something infixes Lavoisier and cautions if it is not oligarchic. sent2: that the watercress is not a kind of a Salinger and it is not a shmegegge does not hold if the ascomycete is not a recession. sent3: if the percolation is a recession then it is a Salinger. sent4: there is something such that that it does not bog healthfulness and/or it is not saccadic is not correct. sent5: that the alexic is a strip and is not allopathic is not correct if something does not strip. sent6: the two-timer is not oligarchic if the Esselen is not allopathic. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does not bog healthfulness and/or it is saccadic is incorrect. sent8: if the two-timer infixes Lavoisier the tabbouleh is a Curl but it is not absorbable. sent9: something is a kind of a two-timer or it is not a recession or both if it is not absorbable. sent10: the plater is not a kind of a musicology. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does not bog healthfulness and/or is not saccadic is not true the percolation is a shmegegge. sent12: the fact that the ascomycete is not a kind of a recession hold if the ade is not a kind of a recession. sent13: if the watercress is not a kind of a Curl the percolation is a two-timer and is absorbable. sent14: the percolation is not a recession if it is absorbable. sent15: the fact that the watercress is not a kind of a Curl is right if the ascomycete does infix Lavoisier and is a Curl. sent16: the percolation is a recession if it is a shmegegge. sent17: if the plater is not a musicology that it capers ascomycete and is not a amnesic is right. sent18: something bogs healthfulness. sent19: if the fact that the alexic strips but it is not allopathic does not hold the Esselen is not allopathic. sent20: the percolation is not a Salinger if that the watercress is not a Salinger and is not a kind of a shmegegge is incorrect. sent21: if something that does caper ascomycete is not a kind of a amnesic then the thatcher is not a kind of a strip. sent22: if there is something such that that the fact that it bogs healthfulness and/or is not saccadic hold is not right then the percolation is a kind of a shmegegge.
sent4 & sent11 -> int1: the percolation is a shmegegge.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the percolation is a recession.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the percolation is not a Salinger.
sent9 -> int3: the tabbouleh is a two-timer and/or is not a recession if it is not absorbable.; sent1 -> int4: the two-timer does infix Lavoisier and cautions if it is not oligarchic.; sent17 & sent10 -> int5: the plater does caper ascomycete and is not a amnesic.; int5 -> int6: something does caper ascomycete and is not a amnesic.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the thatcher does not strip.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a strip.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: that the alexic is both a strip and not allopathic is wrong.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the Esselen is not allopathic.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the two-timer is not oligarchic.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the two-timer infixes Lavoisier and it is a caution.; int12 -> int13: the two-timer infixes Lavoisier.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the tabbouleh is a Curl but it is not absorbable.; int14 -> int15: the tabbouleh is not absorbable.; int3 & int15 -> int16: the tabbouleh is a two-timer or it is not a recession or both.; int16 -> int17: something is a two-timer or is not a recession or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the percolation is a Salinger. ; $context$ = sent1: something infixes Lavoisier and cautions if it is not oligarchic. sent2: that the watercress is not a kind of a Salinger and it is not a shmegegge does not hold if the ascomycete is not a recession. sent3: if the percolation is a recession then it is a Salinger. sent4: there is something such that that it does not bog healthfulness and/or it is not saccadic is not correct. sent5: that the alexic is a strip and is not allopathic is not correct if something does not strip. sent6: the two-timer is not oligarchic if the Esselen is not allopathic. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does not bog healthfulness and/or it is saccadic is incorrect. sent8: if the two-timer infixes Lavoisier the tabbouleh is a Curl but it is not absorbable. sent9: something is a kind of a two-timer or it is not a recession or both if it is not absorbable. sent10: the plater is not a kind of a musicology. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does not bog healthfulness and/or is not saccadic is not true the percolation is a shmegegge. sent12: the fact that the ascomycete is not a kind of a recession hold if the ade is not a kind of a recession. sent13: if the watercress is not a kind of a Curl the percolation is a two-timer and is absorbable. sent14: the percolation is not a recession if it is absorbable. sent15: the fact that the watercress is not a kind of a Curl is right if the ascomycete does infix Lavoisier and is a Curl. sent16: the percolation is a recession if it is a shmegegge. sent17: if the plater is not a musicology that it capers ascomycete and is not a amnesic is right. sent18: something bogs healthfulness. sent19: if the fact that the alexic strips but it is not allopathic does not hold the Esselen is not allopathic. sent20: the percolation is not a Salinger if that the watercress is not a Salinger and is not a kind of a shmegegge is incorrect. sent21: if something that does caper ascomycete is not a kind of a amnesic then the thatcher is not a kind of a strip. sent22: if there is something such that that the fact that it bogs healthfulness and/or is not saccadic hold is not right then the percolation is a kind of a shmegegge. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent11 -> int1: the percolation is a shmegegge.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the percolation is a recession.; int2 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__