the methamphetamine redecorates bioterrorism and does not fall Hominidae.
sent1: if the ferret is not a Rhenish the fact that the torch is a kind of Rhenish thing that is adroit is false. sent2: if the hawser does interrelate demagoguery and it is a socle the farmland is not a kind of an aesthetics. sent3: the radicchio is a socle. sent4: the hawser does interrelate demagoguery and is neurobiological. sent5: if the farmland is not aesthetics that the handcart is a kind of an aesthetics and is a prescription is not correct. sent6: if the radicchio is a kind of a socle then that the hawser is a socle is not false. sent7: if the prothrombinase is not christian the methamphetamine does redecorate bioterrorism and does not fall Hominidae. sent8: if the fact that the handcart is an aesthetics and it is not nonprescription is incorrect the ferret is not Rhenish. sent9: the methamphetamine does redecorate bioterrorism if the fact that the prothrombinase is not christian is not incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the torch is a kind of a Rhenish and it is adroit is incorrect then the prothrombinase is not christian. sent11: the radicchio does not fall Hominidae. sent12: the ferret is not a Rhenish if the handcart is not a prescription.
sent4 -> int1: the hawser does interrelate demagoguery.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the hawser is a kind of a socle is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hawser does interrelate demagoguery and is a kind of a socle.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the farmland is not an aesthetics.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the handcart is aesthetics and is a kind of a prescription is false.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the ferret is not Rhenish.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that the torch is a kind of a Rhenish and it is adroit is not right.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the prothrombinase is not christian.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the methamphetamine redecorates bioterrorism and does not fall Hominidae. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ferret is not a Rhenish the fact that the torch is a kind of Rhenish thing that is adroit is false. sent2: if the hawser does interrelate demagoguery and it is a socle the farmland is not a kind of an aesthetics. sent3: the radicchio is a socle. sent4: the hawser does interrelate demagoguery and is neurobiological. sent5: if the farmland is not aesthetics that the handcart is a kind of an aesthetics and is a prescription is not correct. sent6: if the radicchio is a kind of a socle then that the hawser is a socle is not false. sent7: if the prothrombinase is not christian the methamphetamine does redecorate bioterrorism and does not fall Hominidae. sent8: if the fact that the handcart is an aesthetics and it is not nonprescription is incorrect the ferret is not Rhenish. sent9: the methamphetamine does redecorate bioterrorism if the fact that the prothrombinase is not christian is not incorrect. sent10: if the fact that the torch is a kind of a Rhenish and it is adroit is incorrect then the prothrombinase is not christian. sent11: the radicchio does not fall Hominidae. sent12: the ferret is not a Rhenish if the handcart is not a prescription. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the hawser does interrelate demagoguery.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the hawser is a kind of a socle is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the hawser does interrelate demagoguery and is a kind of a socle.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the farmland is not an aesthetics.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the handcart is aesthetics and is a kind of a prescription is false.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the ferret is not Rhenish.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: that the torch is a kind of a Rhenish and it is adroit is not right.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the prothrombinase is not christian.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__