that something is not minty is not right.
sent1: something is synclinal if the fact that it is syllabic is correct. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is minty and it does not articulate asceticism is wrong the butt is not a standard-bearer. sent3: the youth does syllogize ducking. sent4: the youth is a kind of a Melicytus if the ogive is integrative and is not a Melicytus. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Hyperoglyphe and it does fudge is not right the ogive is syllabic. sent6: the geoduck is not a garibaldi if it is a standard-bearer. sent7: the ogive is not a theologian. sent8: if something is not cousinly it is not a plumb. sent9: if the ogive does syllogize ducking and it does resent slinging then it is not minty. sent10: The ducking does syllogize youth. sent11: something syllogizes ducking and is a theologian if it is not a kind of a standard-bearer. sent12: the ogive does not resent slinging if it is both a standard-bearer and a theologian. sent13: that everything does not resent carapace is not false. sent14: something resents slinging if it syllogizes ducking. sent15: if something articulates asceticism then it does not resent slinging. sent16: if something syllogizes ducking and is a kind of a theologian then it is not a standard-bearer. sent17: that something is a Hyperoglyphe that is a kind of a fudge is false if it does not resent carapace. sent18: the youth is a theologian. sent19: the youth does not articulate asceticism. sent20: the ogive is a standard-bearer if the youth does not articulate asceticism. sent21: a placental is integrative and is not a Melicytus. sent22: something does toilet-train meadowlark and does not cultivate if it is synclinal. sent23: the metamorphism is not a theologian. sent24: the ogive articulates asceticism if the youth is not a standard-bearer. sent25: if something toilet-trains meadowlark and does not cultivate then it is placental. sent26: something is non-minty if the fact that it does not resent slinging is right.
sent3 & sent18 -> int1: the youth syllogizes ducking and is a kind of a theologian.; sent16 -> int2: if the youth syllogizes ducking and is a theologian it is not a standard-bearer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the youth is not a kind of a standard-bearer.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the ogive articulates asceticism.; sent15 -> int5: the ogive does not resent slinging if it articulates asceticism.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ogive does not resent slinging.; sent26 -> int7: if the ogive does not resent slinging it is not minty.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the ogive is not minty.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the butt does resent slinging.
sent14 -> int9: the butt resents slinging if that it syllogizes ducking is correct.; sent11 -> int10: if the fact that the butt is not a standard-bearer is not wrong it syllogizes ducking and is a kind of a theologian.; sent22 -> int11: the ogive does toilet-train meadowlark and does not cultivate if it is synclinal.; sent17 -> int12: that the carapace is a Hyperoglyphe and it is a kind of a fudge is not correct if it does not resent carapace.; sent13 -> int13: the carapace does not resent carapace.; int12 & int13 -> int14: that the carapace is a Hyperoglyphe and it is a fudge does not hold.; int14 -> int15: there is nothing such that it is a Hyperoglyphe and it is a fudge.; int15 -> int16: that the tole is a Hyperoglyphe and fudges is false.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that that it is a Hyperoglyphe that is a fudge is not correct.; sent5 & int17 -> int18: the ogive is syllabic.; sent1 -> int19: the ogive is synclinal if it is syllabic.; int18 & int19 -> int20: the ogive is synclinal.; int11 & int20 -> int21: the ogive toilet-trains meadowlark but it does not cultivate.; sent25 -> int22: if the ogive does toilet-train meadowlark and does not cultivate then it is placental.; int21 & int22 -> int23: the fact that the ogive is placental is not false.; sent21 -> int24: if the ogive is a placental then it is not disintegrative and is not a kind of a Melicytus.; int23 & int24 -> int25: the ogive is integrative but it is not a Melicytus.; int25 & sent4 -> int26: the youth is a Melicytus.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is not minty is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is synclinal if the fact that it is syllabic is correct. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is minty and it does not articulate asceticism is wrong the butt is not a standard-bearer. sent3: the youth does syllogize ducking. sent4: the youth is a kind of a Melicytus if the ogive is integrative and is not a Melicytus. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Hyperoglyphe and it does fudge is not right the ogive is syllabic. sent6: the geoduck is not a garibaldi if it is a standard-bearer. sent7: the ogive is not a theologian. sent8: if something is not cousinly it is not a plumb. sent9: if the ogive does syllogize ducking and it does resent slinging then it is not minty. sent10: The ducking does syllogize youth. sent11: something syllogizes ducking and is a theologian if it is not a kind of a standard-bearer. sent12: the ogive does not resent slinging if it is both a standard-bearer and a theologian. sent13: that everything does not resent carapace is not false. sent14: something resents slinging if it syllogizes ducking. sent15: if something articulates asceticism then it does not resent slinging. sent16: if something syllogizes ducking and is a kind of a theologian then it is not a standard-bearer. sent17: that something is a Hyperoglyphe that is a kind of a fudge is false if it does not resent carapace. sent18: the youth is a theologian. sent19: the youth does not articulate asceticism. sent20: the ogive is a standard-bearer if the youth does not articulate asceticism. sent21: a placental is integrative and is not a Melicytus. sent22: something does toilet-train meadowlark and does not cultivate if it is synclinal. sent23: the metamorphism is not a theologian. sent24: the ogive articulates asceticism if the youth is not a standard-bearer. sent25: if something toilet-trains meadowlark and does not cultivate then it is placental. sent26: something is non-minty if the fact that it does not resent slinging is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent18 -> int1: the youth syllogizes ducking and is a kind of a theologian.; sent16 -> int2: if the youth syllogizes ducking and is a theologian it is not a standard-bearer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the youth is not a kind of a standard-bearer.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the ogive articulates asceticism.; sent15 -> int5: the ogive does not resent slinging if it articulates asceticism.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the ogive does not resent slinging.; sent26 -> int7: if the ogive does not resent slinging it is not minty.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the ogive is not minty.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__