the revising sowbread does not occur and the cryonicsness does not occur.
sent1: the slighting mesalliance does not occur. sent2: the bimolecularness does not occur and/or the hearing does not occur. sent3: the revising assemblyman occurs. sent4: the fact that the prenuptialness happens is not incorrect. sent5: the greenmail occurs. sent6: that the non-noncaloricness and the non-humanistness occurs hold. sent7: if the indelicateness occurs the fact that the reheating occurs and the Sarawakian does not occur is false. sent8: that the noncaloricness does not occur is caused by that the greenmail occurs or the noncaloricness does not occur or both. sent9: the fact that the revising sowbread does not occur and the cryonicsness does not occur is incorrect if that the Sarawakian occurs is right. sent10: if either the bimolecularness does not occur or the hearing does not occur or both the indelicateness happens. sent11: if that the forgettableness but not the postponement occurs is wrong the fact that the episode does not occur is not wrong. sent12: if the noncaloricness occurs the metastableness does not occur. sent13: that the greenmail occurs prevents that the metastableness does not occur. sent14: the spiel occurs if the revising Whitmonday happens. sent15: the non-civicsness and the patrolling gasoline happens. sent16: if the Sarawakian happens the swabbing does not occur and the Oxonianness does not occur. sent17: the non-cryonicsness is triggered by that the pleochroicness does not occur but the metastableness happens. sent18: that the revising sowbread does not occur is not false if the fact that both the reheating and the non-Sarawakianness happens does not hold. sent19: if the non-noncaloricness and the non-humanistness happens the pleochroicness does not occur. sent20: the debarkation does not occur if that the fatalness occurs and the plumbing does not occur is wrong. sent21: that the cryonicsness happens causes that the reheating does not occur and the revising sowbread does not occur. sent22: the haze does not occur. sent23: that the Sarawakian happens is brought about by that the reheating does not occur and the indelicateness does not occur.
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the indelicateness happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the reheating happens but the Sarawakian does not occur is wrong.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the revising sowbread does not occur.; sent19 & sent6 -> int4: the pleochroicness does not occur.; sent13 & sent5 -> int5: the metastableness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the pleochroicness but the metastableness occurs.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: the cryonicsness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the revising sowbread does not occur and the cryonicsness does not occur hold is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the revising sowbread does not occur and the cryonicsness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the slighting mesalliance does not occur. sent2: the bimolecularness does not occur and/or the hearing does not occur. sent3: the revising assemblyman occurs. sent4: the fact that the prenuptialness happens is not incorrect. sent5: the greenmail occurs. sent6: that the non-noncaloricness and the non-humanistness occurs hold. sent7: if the indelicateness occurs the fact that the reheating occurs and the Sarawakian does not occur is false. sent8: that the noncaloricness does not occur is caused by that the greenmail occurs or the noncaloricness does not occur or both. sent9: the fact that the revising sowbread does not occur and the cryonicsness does not occur is incorrect if that the Sarawakian occurs is right. sent10: if either the bimolecularness does not occur or the hearing does not occur or both the indelicateness happens. sent11: if that the forgettableness but not the postponement occurs is wrong the fact that the episode does not occur is not wrong. sent12: if the noncaloricness occurs the metastableness does not occur. sent13: that the greenmail occurs prevents that the metastableness does not occur. sent14: the spiel occurs if the revising Whitmonday happens. sent15: the non-civicsness and the patrolling gasoline happens. sent16: if the Sarawakian happens the swabbing does not occur and the Oxonianness does not occur. sent17: the non-cryonicsness is triggered by that the pleochroicness does not occur but the metastableness happens. sent18: that the revising sowbread does not occur is not false if the fact that both the reheating and the non-Sarawakianness happens does not hold. sent19: if the non-noncaloricness and the non-humanistness happens the pleochroicness does not occur. sent20: the debarkation does not occur if that the fatalness occurs and the plumbing does not occur is wrong. sent21: that the cryonicsness happens causes that the reheating does not occur and the revising sowbread does not occur. sent22: the haze does not occur. sent23: that the Sarawakian happens is brought about by that the reheating does not occur and the indelicateness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the indelicateness happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: that the reheating happens but the Sarawakian does not occur is wrong.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: the revising sowbread does not occur.; sent19 & sent6 -> int4: the pleochroicness does not occur.; sent13 & sent5 -> int5: the metastableness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the pleochroicness but the metastableness occurs.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: the cryonicsness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__