the soubrette is not non-interlinear.
sent1: the fact that something is a allemande that does not howl idolization is not true if it is not prosthodontics. sent2: if something does not uncloak the earphone does stint cush-cush. sent3: the mend is a kind of a allemande. sent4: if something is not prosthodontics the haunch howls idolization. sent5: that something does not howl idolization and is prosthodontics is wrong if it is a kind of a blond. sent6: if the limekiln does not howl idolization then the soubrette is not a kind of a blond and it does not uncloak. sent7: the mend is a analysand but it is not a kind of a hamper if it is a allemande. sent8: something is non-interlinear if it is non-blond thing that does not uncloak. sent9: the mend is not a ling if the fact that it does not howl idolization and is not non-prosthodontics is not correct. sent10: if the limekiln does uncloak then that it is both not a ling and a analysand is false. sent11: if that the mend is a ling and is not a kind of a hamper does not hold the limekiln is not prosthodontics. sent12: if something does not uncloak then the fact that it is not a analysand and does stint roadster is false. sent13: the soubrette is interlinear if the earphone stints cush-cush. sent14: the mend does not stint cush-cush. sent15: if the mend is not prosthodontics then it does not stint cush-cush. sent16: if the mend does stint cush-cush the fact that it is a kind of a ling that does not hamper is not true. sent17: that the mend is a analysand and hampers is not correct. sent18: if the limekiln does uncloak then the mend is a blond. sent19: that the limekiln is a allemande and does not howl idolization is not right if it does not uncloak.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limekiln does uncloak.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mend is a kind of a blond.; sent5 -> int2: that the mend does not howl idolization and is prosthodontics is not correct if it is a kind of a blond.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mend does not howl idolization but it is prosthodontics is incorrect.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the mend is not a ling.; sent7 & sent3 -> int5: the mend is a analysand but it is not a kind of a hamper.;
the fact that the haunch is not a analysand and stints roadster is not right.
sent12 -> int6: if the haunch does not uncloak then that it is not a analysand and stints roadster is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the soubrette is not non-interlinear. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a allemande that does not howl idolization is not true if it is not prosthodontics. sent2: if something does not uncloak the earphone does stint cush-cush. sent3: the mend is a kind of a allemande. sent4: if something is not prosthodontics the haunch howls idolization. sent5: that something does not howl idolization and is prosthodontics is wrong if it is a kind of a blond. sent6: if the limekiln does not howl idolization then the soubrette is not a kind of a blond and it does not uncloak. sent7: the mend is a analysand but it is not a kind of a hamper if it is a allemande. sent8: something is non-interlinear if it is non-blond thing that does not uncloak. sent9: the mend is not a ling if the fact that it does not howl idolization and is not non-prosthodontics is not correct. sent10: if the limekiln does uncloak then that it is both not a ling and a analysand is false. sent11: if that the mend is a ling and is not a kind of a hamper does not hold the limekiln is not prosthodontics. sent12: if something does not uncloak then the fact that it is not a analysand and does stint roadster is false. sent13: the soubrette is interlinear if the earphone stints cush-cush. sent14: the mend does not stint cush-cush. sent15: if the mend is not prosthodontics then it does not stint cush-cush. sent16: if the mend does stint cush-cush the fact that it is a kind of a ling that does not hamper is not true. sent17: that the mend is a analysand and hampers is not correct. sent18: if the limekiln does uncloak then the mend is a blond. sent19: that the limekiln is a allemande and does not howl idolization is not right if it does not uncloak. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limekiln does uncloak.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mend is a kind of a blond.; sent5 -> int2: that the mend does not howl idolization and is prosthodontics is not correct if it is a kind of a blond.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mend does not howl idolization but it is prosthodontics is incorrect.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the mend is not a ling.; sent7 & sent3 -> int5: the mend is a analysand but it is not a kind of a hamper.; __UNKNOWN__