the President does not occur and the stimulativeness happens.
sent1: the allantoicness occurs. sent2: that the President does not occur is caused by that the normalness does not occur and the begrudging does not occur. sent3: the synthesizing stocktaking does not occur. sent4: the unportableness does not occur. sent5: that the conservation occurs and the begrudging occurs is not true. sent6: the macrocephalicness does not occur. sent7: the carnival happens and the styling chachalaca happens. sent8: the word does not occur and the synthesizing mishap does not occur. sent9: the normalness does not occur if the fact that the synthesizing stocktaking happens but the macrocephalicness does not occur is not right. sent10: if the fact that the conservation and the begrudging occurs is not correct the begrudging does not occur. sent11: that the Manxness occurs is correct. sent12: not the tragedy but the styling Nation happens. sent13: if both the non-natalness and the non-titularness happens the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur. sent14: the uncongenialness happens. sent15: the flowage occurs. sent16: the suttee does not occur. sent17: the normalness does not occur if the macrocephalicness happens. sent18: the fact that the fact that both the synthesizing stocktaking and the macrocephalicness happens is false is true. sent19: both the bottomedness and the non-unchristianness happens. sent20: the smut happens. sent21: the synthesizing tobacco occurs and the federalization occurs. sent22: the styling stairhead and the styling chachalaca occurs. sent23: the fact that the stimulativeness happens is not false if the boustrophedonicness occurs. sent24: the smut and the boustrophedonicness occurs. sent25: the fact that the spanging limiting does not occur is correct. sent26: if that the styling kitbag but not the mellowing clear happens is incorrect then the moderation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the synthesizing stocktaking but not the macrocephalicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the synthesizing stocktaking occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the synthesizing stocktaking and the non-macrocephalicness happens is wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the normalness does not occur.; sent10 & sent5 -> int5: that the begrudging happens does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the normalness does not occur and the begrudging does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the President does not occur.; sent24 -> int8: the boustrophedonicness happens.; sent23 & int8 -> int9: the stimulativeness occurs.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that not the President but the stimulativeness occurs is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the President does not occur and the stimulativeness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the allantoicness occurs. sent2: that the President does not occur is caused by that the normalness does not occur and the begrudging does not occur. sent3: the synthesizing stocktaking does not occur. sent4: the unportableness does not occur. sent5: that the conservation occurs and the begrudging occurs is not true. sent6: the macrocephalicness does not occur. sent7: the carnival happens and the styling chachalaca happens. sent8: the word does not occur and the synthesizing mishap does not occur. sent9: the normalness does not occur if the fact that the synthesizing stocktaking happens but the macrocephalicness does not occur is not right. sent10: if the fact that the conservation and the begrudging occurs is not correct the begrudging does not occur. sent11: that the Manxness occurs is correct. sent12: not the tragedy but the styling Nation happens. sent13: if both the non-natalness and the non-titularness happens the ring-around-the-rosy does not occur. sent14: the uncongenialness happens. sent15: the flowage occurs. sent16: the suttee does not occur. sent17: the normalness does not occur if the macrocephalicness happens. sent18: the fact that the fact that both the synthesizing stocktaking and the macrocephalicness happens is false is true. sent19: both the bottomedness and the non-unchristianness happens. sent20: the smut happens. sent21: the synthesizing tobacco occurs and the federalization occurs. sent22: the styling stairhead and the styling chachalaca occurs. sent23: the fact that the stimulativeness happens is not false if the boustrophedonicness occurs. sent24: the smut and the boustrophedonicness occurs. sent25: the fact that the spanging limiting does not occur is correct. sent26: if that the styling kitbag but not the mellowing clear happens is incorrect then the moderation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the synthesizing stocktaking but not the macrocephalicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the synthesizing stocktaking occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the synthesizing stocktaking and the non-macrocephalicness happens is wrong.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the normalness does not occur.; sent10 & sent5 -> int5: that the begrudging happens does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the normalness does not occur and the begrudging does not occur.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the President does not occur.; sent24 -> int8: the boustrophedonicness happens.; sent23 & int8 -> int9: the stimulativeness occurs.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__