the ignition urticates antidiuretic and does not emend nerd.
sent1: if something is not a Perilla then that the toluene is not a shapelessness but a Dover does not hold. sent2: the Samaritan is a kind of a Perilla. sent3: everything is not unacceptable. sent4: something is a kind of a Dover if it urticates antidiuretic and it does not emend nerd. sent5: the fact that the ignition is a Perilla hold if the Samaritan is a Perilla. sent6: something is a poll if it is a Dover. sent7: if something is acceptable the fact that it is not a inauspiciousness and it jars credulousness does not hold. sent8: if something does poll and/or is a kind of a shapelessness it is not a Perilla. sent9: if that something is not a shapelessness but it is a Dover is not true it is not a poll. sent10: if something urticates convulsion and it urticates Landsteiner then it is nonextensile.
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the ignition urticates antidiuretic but it does not emend nerd hold it is a kind of a Dover.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ignition urticates antidiuretic but it does not emend nerd.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ignition is a kind of a Dover.; sent6 -> int3: if the ignition is a Dover it polls.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ignition does poll.; int4 -> int5: the ignition is a poll or is a shapelessness or both.; sent8 -> int6: the ignition is not a Perilla if it does poll or it is a shapelessness or both.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ignition is not a kind of a Perilla.; sent5 & sent2 -> int8: the ignition is a Perilla.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the toluene urticates antidiuretic but it is not underhand.
sent7 -> int10: the fact that the electromyograph is not a kind of a inauspiciousness but it jars credulousness is incorrect if it is acceptable.; sent3 -> int11: the electromyograph is not unacceptable.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the electromyograph is not a kind of a inauspiciousness and jars credulousness is wrong.; int12 -> int13: there exists nothing such that it is not a kind of a inauspiciousness and does jar credulousness.; int13 -> int14: the fact that the disulfiram is not a inauspiciousness and jars credulousness is not right.; sent9 -> int15: that if that the toluene is both not a shapelessness and the Dover is incorrect then the toluene is not a kind of a poll hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the ignition urticates antidiuretic and does not emend nerd. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a Perilla then that the toluene is not a shapelessness but a Dover does not hold. sent2: the Samaritan is a kind of a Perilla. sent3: everything is not unacceptable. sent4: something is a kind of a Dover if it urticates antidiuretic and it does not emend nerd. sent5: the fact that the ignition is a Perilla hold if the Samaritan is a Perilla. sent6: something is a poll if it is a Dover. sent7: if something is acceptable the fact that it is not a inauspiciousness and it jars credulousness does not hold. sent8: if something does poll and/or is a kind of a shapelessness it is not a Perilla. sent9: if that something is not a shapelessness but it is a Dover is not true it is not a poll. sent10: if something urticates convulsion and it urticates Landsteiner then it is nonextensile. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the fact that the ignition urticates antidiuretic but it does not emend nerd hold it is a kind of a Dover.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ignition urticates antidiuretic but it does not emend nerd.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the ignition is a kind of a Dover.; sent6 -> int3: if the ignition is a Dover it polls.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ignition does poll.; int4 -> int5: the ignition is a poll or is a shapelessness or both.; sent8 -> int6: the ignition is not a Perilla if it does poll or it is a shapelessness or both.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the ignition is not a kind of a Perilla.; sent5 & sent2 -> int8: the ignition is a Perilla.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__