the spending irredentism is caused by the prewarness.
sent1: the exilicness happens. sent2: the ringing occurs. sent3: that the prewarness happens and the cabaret does not occur leads to that the spending irredentism occurs. sent4: the driness but not the brush-off occurs. sent5: if the testifying Brummell does not occur the cabaret does not occur. sent6: the testifying hexameter does not occur if the graphic does not occur. sent7: the teachership does not occur and the Aleutianness happens. sent8: that the decantation occurs is not incorrect. sent9: not the dentalness but the antennalness happens. sent10: not the Moldovanness but the decantation occurs. sent11: if the testifying Brummell occurs the Moldovanness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the testifying Brummell occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the Moldovanness happens.; sent10 -> int2: the Moldovanness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the testifying Brummell does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the cabaret does not occur is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the prewarness occurs.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: the prewarness occurs but the cabaret does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the spending irredentism happens is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the spending irredentism is caused by the prewarness. ; $context$ = sent1: the exilicness happens. sent2: the ringing occurs. sent3: that the prewarness happens and the cabaret does not occur leads to that the spending irredentism occurs. sent4: the driness but not the brush-off occurs. sent5: if the testifying Brummell does not occur the cabaret does not occur. sent6: the testifying hexameter does not occur if the graphic does not occur. sent7: the teachership does not occur and the Aleutianness happens. sent8: that the decantation occurs is not incorrect. sent9: not the dentalness but the antennalness happens. sent10: not the Moldovanness but the decantation occurs. sent11: if the testifying Brummell occurs the Moldovanness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the testifying Brummell occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the Moldovanness happens.; sent10 -> int2: the Moldovanness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the testifying Brummell does not occur.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the cabaret does not occur is correct.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the prewarness occurs.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: the prewarness occurs but the cabaret does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fact that the spending irredentism happens is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__