the raiser does not slum.
sent1: the kraal does revolve. sent2: if the fact that something is both bloody and not exteroceptive is false it slums. sent3: the raiser is not a slum if the fact that the kraal is non-bloody is not wrong. sent4: that the fact that the blogger is serious but it is not azido is wrong is right. sent5: if something does tunnel drumming but it is not azido then it is exteroceptive. sent6: if the kraal does bloody it is not azido. sent7: a non-Germanic thing that does tunnel einsteinium is not exteroceptive. sent8: the fact that the antheridiophore is a bee is not wrong. sent9: if the kraal is bloody then it tunnels drumming and is not azido. sent10: if the kraal is a kind of a Germanic the fact that the raiser bloodies but it is not exteroceptive is not right. sent11: there is nothing that does tunnel einsteinium and does not revolve. sent12: that that the blogger tunnels einsteinium and revolves is not right is not wrong. sent13: the blogger is a Germanic if the kraal is exteroceptive. sent14: if something does not revolve then it tunnels einsteinium and it is Germanic. sent15: something does not revolve if that it is ovine does not hold. sent16: there is nothing such that it does tunnel einsteinium and it revolves. sent17: if the blogger is not a duplicate but ovine the kraal is not ovine. sent18: if the blogger is a kind of a Germanic that is not azido it tunnels drumming. sent19: the kraal is not non-exteroceptive if it does tunnel drumming and it is azido. sent20: if that something tunnels einsteinium but it does not revolve is wrong it is not Germanic. sent21: the fact that the blogger is exteroceptive but it does not tunnel einsteinium if the blogger does revolve is true. sent22: the kraal is not azido. sent23: something is exteroceptive if it does tunnel drumming and is azido.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kraal bloodies.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the kraal tunnels drumming and is not azido.; sent5 -> int2: if the kraal does tunnel drumming and is not azido that it is exteroceptive is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kraal is exteroceptive.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the blogger is a Germanic.; sent20 -> int5: if that the blogger tunnels einsteinium and does not revolve is not right then it is not Germanic.; sent11 -> int6: the fact that the blogger tunnels einsteinium and does not revolve is not right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the blogger is not a kind of a Germanic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the kraal is not bloody.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the raiser does slum is not incorrect.
sent7 -> int10: if the kraal is not Germanic but it does tunnel einsteinium it is not exteroceptive.;
$hypothesis$ = the raiser does not slum. ; $context$ = sent1: the kraal does revolve. sent2: if the fact that something is both bloody and not exteroceptive is false it slums. sent3: the raiser is not a slum if the fact that the kraal is non-bloody is not wrong. sent4: that the fact that the blogger is serious but it is not azido is wrong is right. sent5: if something does tunnel drumming but it is not azido then it is exteroceptive. sent6: if the kraal does bloody it is not azido. sent7: a non-Germanic thing that does tunnel einsteinium is not exteroceptive. sent8: the fact that the antheridiophore is a bee is not wrong. sent9: if the kraal is bloody then it tunnels drumming and is not azido. sent10: if the kraal is a kind of a Germanic the fact that the raiser bloodies but it is not exteroceptive is not right. sent11: there is nothing that does tunnel einsteinium and does not revolve. sent12: that that the blogger tunnels einsteinium and revolves is not right is not wrong. sent13: the blogger is a Germanic if the kraal is exteroceptive. sent14: if something does not revolve then it tunnels einsteinium and it is Germanic. sent15: something does not revolve if that it is ovine does not hold. sent16: there is nothing such that it does tunnel einsteinium and it revolves. sent17: if the blogger is not a duplicate but ovine the kraal is not ovine. sent18: if the blogger is a kind of a Germanic that is not azido it tunnels drumming. sent19: the kraal is not non-exteroceptive if it does tunnel drumming and it is azido. sent20: if that something tunnels einsteinium but it does not revolve is wrong it is not Germanic. sent21: the fact that the blogger is exteroceptive but it does not tunnel einsteinium if the blogger does revolve is true. sent22: the kraal is not azido. sent23: something is exteroceptive if it does tunnel drumming and is azido. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kraal bloodies.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the kraal tunnels drumming and is not azido.; sent5 -> int2: if the kraal does tunnel drumming and is not azido that it is exteroceptive is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kraal is exteroceptive.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the blogger is a Germanic.; sent20 -> int5: if that the blogger tunnels einsteinium and does not revolve is not right then it is not Germanic.; sent11 -> int6: the fact that the blogger tunnels einsteinium and does not revolve is not right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the blogger is not a kind of a Germanic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the kraal is not bloody.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__