the polemic is not a Gamma.
sent1: if the workmate does glorify and is not a Gamma the polemic is not a kind of a Gamma. sent2: if the coney is a federalist the tussah is not a federalist. sent3: something glorifies if it does not recharge and it is a kind of a denudation. sent4: if the tussah is not a federalist that the workmate is a wishbone and it is transitional is incorrect. sent5: something is a Gamma if it does glorify. sent6: something is not transitional if that it is a wishbone and transitional is incorrect. sent7: something is robotics if it is a icepick. sent8: the coney is a federalist if the persimmon is a Cynoglossidae. sent9: if something is not transitional then it does glorify and is not a Gamma. sent10: everything does not recharge and is a kind of a denudation.
sent10 -> int1: the polemic does not recharge but it is a denudation.; sent3 -> int2: if the polemic does not recharge and is a kind of a denudation it does glorify.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the polemic does glorify.; sent5 -> int4: if the polemic glorifies then it is a kind of a Gamma.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the polemic is not a Gamma.
sent9 -> int5: if the workmate is not transitional then it does glorify and it is not a Gamma.; sent6 -> int6: the workmate is not transitional if that it is a wishbone and is transitional does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the polemic is not a Gamma. ; $context$ = sent1: if the workmate does glorify and is not a Gamma the polemic is not a kind of a Gamma. sent2: if the coney is a federalist the tussah is not a federalist. sent3: something glorifies if it does not recharge and it is a kind of a denudation. sent4: if the tussah is not a federalist that the workmate is a wishbone and it is transitional is incorrect. sent5: something is a Gamma if it does glorify. sent6: something is not transitional if that it is a wishbone and transitional is incorrect. sent7: something is robotics if it is a icepick. sent8: the coney is a federalist if the persimmon is a Cynoglossidae. sent9: if something is not transitional then it does glorify and is not a Gamma. sent10: everything does not recharge and is a kind of a denudation. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the polemic does not recharge but it is a denudation.; sent3 -> int2: if the polemic does not recharge and is a kind of a denudation it does glorify.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the polemic does glorify.; sent5 -> int4: if the polemic glorifies then it is a kind of a Gamma.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__