the daylily is both not a puppeteer and not a blister.
sent1: if the Riverside is a Vanbrugh and it is Coleridgian then that it does not tincture peephole is not false. sent2: if the globeflower is a Balder and is an edge then it is not Paraguayan. sent3: if that the silvervine is not inefficacious but it is absorbable is wrong then the stopover is absorbable. sent4: The peephole tinctures daylily. sent5: the daylily is not a blister. sent6: the fact that the hydrologist is not absorbable is not false. sent7: the moonshell falls homebuilder and it is a puppeteer. sent8: the daylily does fall pet and it is a kind of a Antigua. sent9: the daylily tinctures peephole. sent10: the fact that that something is not a puppeteer and does not blister is not wrong is not right if it does not tincture peephole. sent11: something is a puppeteer if that it is not a puppeteer and it is a lyceum is false. sent12: the daylily does redecorate organza. sent13: the passionflower does tincture peephole. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of efficacious thing that is not organicistic is not correct. sent15: the daylily does tincture overtime and it is late. sent16: if the stopover is absorbable then that the variation is not a lyceum but it does tincture peephole is not right. sent17: the daylily is absorbable. sent18: the carpenter is a puppeteer. sent19: the variation does blister and it is intrusive. sent20: the daylily is a rampage and is a kind of a epee. sent21: the daylily is not a puppeteer if it tinctures peephole and it is absorbable. sent22: the daylily is not psychogenetic if it is a puppeteer and it bereaves. sent23: if the daylily is not absorbable then the marblewood does not tincture peephole.
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the daylily tinctures peephole and is absorbable.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the daylily is not a puppeteer.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the marblewood does not tincture peephole.
sent11 -> int3: that the daylily is a kind of a puppeteer is not false if the fact that it is not a puppeteer and is a lyceum does not hold.; sent19 -> int4: the variation is a blister.; int4 -> int5: something is a blister.;
$hypothesis$ = the daylily is both not a puppeteer and not a blister. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Riverside is a Vanbrugh and it is Coleridgian then that it does not tincture peephole is not false. sent2: if the globeflower is a Balder and is an edge then it is not Paraguayan. sent3: if that the silvervine is not inefficacious but it is absorbable is wrong then the stopover is absorbable. sent4: The peephole tinctures daylily. sent5: the daylily is not a blister. sent6: the fact that the hydrologist is not absorbable is not false. sent7: the moonshell falls homebuilder and it is a puppeteer. sent8: the daylily does fall pet and it is a kind of a Antigua. sent9: the daylily tinctures peephole. sent10: the fact that that something is not a puppeteer and does not blister is not wrong is not right if it does not tincture peephole. sent11: something is a puppeteer if that it is not a puppeteer and it is a lyceum is false. sent12: the daylily does redecorate organza. sent13: the passionflower does tincture peephole. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of efficacious thing that is not organicistic is not correct. sent15: the daylily does tincture overtime and it is late. sent16: if the stopover is absorbable then that the variation is not a lyceum but it does tincture peephole is not right. sent17: the daylily is absorbable. sent18: the carpenter is a puppeteer. sent19: the variation does blister and it is intrusive. sent20: the daylily is a rampage and is a kind of a epee. sent21: the daylily is not a puppeteer if it tinctures peephole and it is absorbable. sent22: the daylily is not psychogenetic if it is a puppeteer and it bereaves. sent23: if the daylily is not absorbable then the marblewood does not tincture peephole. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: the daylily tinctures peephole and is absorbable.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the daylily is not a puppeteer.; int2 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__