that the carcinogen is a kind of a Gobiesocidae is not false.
sent1: something that is a syncategorem is not prognathous and does jar praenomen. sent2: the carcinogen does not emend cove but it is opisthognathous. sent3: that that the carcinogen emends cove and it is opisthognathous hold does not hold if the fact that it is a Gobiesocidae is not wrong. sent4: something is a kind of a booby if it does urticate Kansa. sent5: the carcinogen does not emend cove. sent6: if the machinist is a booby then the triplet is a syncategorem. sent7: the fact that the fact that the carcinogen does emend cove and is opisthognathous is not true hold. sent8: if the fact that the refinisher is a Gobiesocidae and it is a licorice is wrong the carcinogen is not a kind of a licorice. sent9: the fact that something does not emend cove but it is opisthognathous is incorrect if it is a kind of a Gobiesocidae. sent10: the Demulen is not a kind of a licorice if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a planarian and it does not urticate Hull is not correct. sent11: that something emends cove and is opisthognathous is incorrect if it is a Gobiesocidae. sent12: the fact that the plasmacyte is not a kind of a planarian and it does not urticate Hull is incorrect if the Gentianella is not falconine. sent13: the machinist does urticate Kansa and it is a thunderer. sent14: the Gentianella is not falconine if the triplet is not prognathous and jars praenomen.
sent9 -> int1: that the carcinogen does not emend cove and is opisthognathous is not correct if it is a Gobiesocidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carcinogen is a Gobiesocidae.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the carcinogen does not emend cove and is opisthognathous is not right.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the carcinogen is not a licorice.
sent1 -> int4: the triplet is a kind of non-prognathous thing that does jar praenomen if it is a syncategorem.; sent4 -> int5: if the machinist urticates Kansa then it is a kind of a booby.; sent13 -> int6: the machinist does urticate Kansa.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the machinist is a booby.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the triplet is a syncategorem.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the triplet is not prognathous and jars praenomen.; sent14 & int9 -> int10: the Gentianella is not falconine.; sent12 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the plasmacyte is not a planarian and does not urticate Hull is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a planarian and does not urticate Hull is wrong.; int12 & sent10 -> int13: the Demulen is not a licorice.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not a licorice.;
$hypothesis$ = that the carcinogen is a kind of a Gobiesocidae is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is a syncategorem is not prognathous and does jar praenomen. sent2: the carcinogen does not emend cove but it is opisthognathous. sent3: that that the carcinogen emends cove and it is opisthognathous hold does not hold if the fact that it is a Gobiesocidae is not wrong. sent4: something is a kind of a booby if it does urticate Kansa. sent5: the carcinogen does not emend cove. sent6: if the machinist is a booby then the triplet is a syncategorem. sent7: the fact that the fact that the carcinogen does emend cove and is opisthognathous is not true hold. sent8: if the fact that the refinisher is a Gobiesocidae and it is a licorice is wrong the carcinogen is not a kind of a licorice. sent9: the fact that something does not emend cove but it is opisthognathous is incorrect if it is a kind of a Gobiesocidae. sent10: the Demulen is not a kind of a licorice if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a planarian and it does not urticate Hull is not correct. sent11: that something emends cove and is opisthognathous is incorrect if it is a Gobiesocidae. sent12: the fact that the plasmacyte is not a kind of a planarian and it does not urticate Hull is incorrect if the Gentianella is not falconine. sent13: the machinist does urticate Kansa and it is a thunderer. sent14: the Gentianella is not falconine if the triplet is not prognathous and jars praenomen. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the carcinogen does not emend cove and is opisthognathous is not correct if it is a Gobiesocidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carcinogen is a Gobiesocidae.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the carcinogen does not emend cove and is opisthognathous is not right.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__