there exists something such that if it does not exacerbate and it is pathological then it is a vandal.
sent1: if the hiccup does not devalue and is a kind of a puce then it is pathological. sent2: something does devalue if it does not fragment starvation and is a Ecuador. sent3: if the Sumerian exacerbates and is pathological it is a vandal. sent4: there exists something such that if it exacerbates and is pathological then that it is a vandal is true. sent5: that the amphitheater is a kind of a puce is not wrong if that it is not a hurry and bates is not wrong. sent6: if something does exacerbate and it is pathological then it is a vandal. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a blowout and it sputters motormouth then it does financier.
there exists something such that if it does not fragment starvation and it is a Ecuador it devalues.
sent2 -> int1: the goatherd devalues if it does not fragment starvation and is a Ecuador.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not exacerbate and it is pathological then it is a vandal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hiccup does not devalue and is a kind of a puce then it is pathological. sent2: something does devalue if it does not fragment starvation and is a Ecuador. sent3: if the Sumerian exacerbates and is pathological it is a vandal. sent4: there exists something such that if it exacerbates and is pathological then that it is a vandal is true. sent5: that the amphitheater is a kind of a puce is not wrong if that it is not a hurry and bates is not wrong. sent6: if something does exacerbate and it is pathological then it is a vandal. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a blowout and it sputters motormouth then it does financier. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__