the briar is not a skipper.
sent1: the briar does skipper and it dematerializes if the fist is not counterclockwise. sent2: the rumen is not counterclockwise. sent3: if the fact that something does not hog militant and it is non-androgenic is incorrect it does dematerialize. sent4: the fact that the oocyte does not hog militant is not incorrect. sent5: if the product is counterclockwise and does dematerialize the briar is not a skipper. sent6: if that the lumpsucker is both not basidiomycetous and raptorial is not correct then it is not raptorial. sent7: if something beggars erythroderma it heliographs. sent8: the briar is not cryonic. sent9: that the lumpsucker is not basidiomycetous and is raptorial does not hold. sent10: something does hog militant. sent11: that the briar is not algorithmic is correct. sent12: if that the lumpsucker is not soteriological and/or is a Amphiumidae is not correct then that the flinthead is not a kind of a Friday is not correct. sent13: the briar is an unknown. sent14: something hogs militant if it does beggar biliousness and it is not a Portugal. sent15: the briar is a subjectivism. sent16: if something is algorithmic but not a subjectivism then it is counterclockwise. sent17: if the product is not a Friday it is algorithmic and it is not a kind of a subjectivism. sent18: that something is not soteriological or it is a kind of a Amphiumidae or both is incorrect if the fact that it is not raptorial is not false. sent19: the fact that the product does not hog militant and is not androgenic is false if there exists something such that it does hog militant. sent20: the fact that the product is not a Friday is not false.
sent16 -> int1: if the product is algorithmic and is not a subjectivism it is counterclockwise.; sent17 & sent20 -> int2: the product is algorithmic but it is not a subjectivism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the product is counterclockwise.; sent3 -> int4: the product does dematerialize if the fact that it does not hog militant and it is not androgenic does not hold.; sent10 & sent19 -> int5: the fact that the product does not hog militant and is not androgenic does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the product dematerializes.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the product is counterclockwise thing that dematerializes.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the cripple beggars biliousness but it is not a kind of a Portugal is correct it hogs militant.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the briar is not a skipper. ; $context$ = sent1: the briar does skipper and it dematerializes if the fist is not counterclockwise. sent2: the rumen is not counterclockwise. sent3: if the fact that something does not hog militant and it is non-androgenic is incorrect it does dematerialize. sent4: the fact that the oocyte does not hog militant is not incorrect. sent5: if the product is counterclockwise and does dematerialize the briar is not a skipper. sent6: if that the lumpsucker is both not basidiomycetous and raptorial is not correct then it is not raptorial. sent7: if something beggars erythroderma it heliographs. sent8: the briar is not cryonic. sent9: that the lumpsucker is not basidiomycetous and is raptorial does not hold. sent10: something does hog militant. sent11: that the briar is not algorithmic is correct. sent12: if that the lumpsucker is not soteriological and/or is a Amphiumidae is not correct then that the flinthead is not a kind of a Friday is not correct. sent13: the briar is an unknown. sent14: something hogs militant if it does beggar biliousness and it is not a Portugal. sent15: the briar is a subjectivism. sent16: if something is algorithmic but not a subjectivism then it is counterclockwise. sent17: if the product is not a Friday it is algorithmic and it is not a kind of a subjectivism. sent18: that something is not soteriological or it is a kind of a Amphiumidae or both is incorrect if the fact that it is not raptorial is not false. sent19: the fact that the product does not hog militant and is not androgenic is false if there exists something such that it does hog militant. sent20: the fact that the product is not a Friday is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the product is algorithmic and is not a subjectivism it is counterclockwise.; sent17 & sent20 -> int2: the product is algorithmic but it is not a subjectivism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the product is counterclockwise.; sent3 -> int4: the product does dematerialize if the fact that it does not hog militant and it is not androgenic does not hold.; sent10 & sent19 -> int5: the fact that the product does not hog militant and is not androgenic does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the product dematerializes.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the product is counterclockwise thing that dematerializes.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__