the microsporidian does not descry reorientation.
sent1: if the microsporidian is a statuary that it does not descry reorientation hold. sent2: there are achromatinic and non-proximal things. sent3: if the piste is not a statuary the outboard descries diffuser and it yields deceptiveness. sent4: the fact that that the launch is both achromatinic and not proximal is true is wrong. sent5: the outboard yields maleo if the photomontage yields starkness. sent6: the photomontage yields starkness if there is something such that it is proximal. sent7: if something is a kind of a statuary it does not descry reorientation. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is achromatinic and proximal is not correct. sent9: that the launch is a kind of achromatinic thing that is proximal does not hold. sent10: the piste is not a statuary if the insolation is both a merchandise and a statuary. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is achromatinic and it is not proximal does not hold the photomontage yields starkness. sent12: if the photomontage descries diffuser the fact that it does not yield starkness and it yields maleo is correct. sent13: if the fact that the piste does descry diffuser is not false the microsporidian yields deceptiveness. sent14: the insolation is a kind of a statuary that is a kind of a Sinclair. sent15: something does not descry reorientation if either it yields deceptiveness or it is a statuary or both. sent16: that the piste does descry diffuser is not incorrect if the outboard does yield maleo. sent17: the fact that the insolation is a merchandise hold.
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is achromatinic and it is not proximal does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the photomontage does yield starkness.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the outboard does yield maleo.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the piste does descry diffuser.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the microsporidian does yield deceptiveness.; int5 -> int6: the microsporidian does yield deceptiveness and/or is a kind of a statuary.; sent15 -> int7: the microsporidian does not descry reorientation if it does yield deceptiveness and/or is a statuary.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the microsporidian does descry reorientation.
sent14 -> int8: the insolation is a kind of a statuary.; sent17 & int8 -> int9: the insolation is a merchandise and statuary.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the piste is not a statuary.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the outboard does descry diffuser and it does yield deceptiveness.; int11 -> int12: the outboard descries diffuser.; int12 -> int13: something descries diffuser.;
$hypothesis$ = the microsporidian does not descry reorientation. ; $context$ = sent1: if the microsporidian is a statuary that it does not descry reorientation hold. sent2: there are achromatinic and non-proximal things. sent3: if the piste is not a statuary the outboard descries diffuser and it yields deceptiveness. sent4: the fact that that the launch is both achromatinic and not proximal is true is wrong. sent5: the outboard yields maleo if the photomontage yields starkness. sent6: the photomontage yields starkness if there is something such that it is proximal. sent7: if something is a kind of a statuary it does not descry reorientation. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it is achromatinic and proximal is not correct. sent9: that the launch is a kind of achromatinic thing that is proximal does not hold. sent10: the piste is not a statuary if the insolation is both a merchandise and a statuary. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is achromatinic and it is not proximal does not hold the photomontage yields starkness. sent12: if the photomontage descries diffuser the fact that it does not yield starkness and it yields maleo is correct. sent13: if the fact that the piste does descry diffuser is not false the microsporidian yields deceptiveness. sent14: the insolation is a kind of a statuary that is a kind of a Sinclair. sent15: something does not descry reorientation if either it yields deceptiveness or it is a statuary or both. sent16: that the piste does descry diffuser is not incorrect if the outboard does yield maleo. sent17: the fact that the insolation is a merchandise hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is achromatinic and it is not proximal does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the photomontage does yield starkness.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the outboard does yield maleo.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the piste does descry diffuser.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the microsporidian does yield deceptiveness.; int5 -> int6: the microsporidian does yield deceptiveness and/or is a kind of a statuary.; sent15 -> int7: the microsporidian does not descry reorientation if it does yield deceptiveness and/or is a statuary.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__