the fact that the sac is biographic thing that does extricate tracer is not correct.
sent1: if something is not a piecework and it does not extricate Webb then it does not bilk validity. sent2: that the snare is a applique or it is biographic or both hold if the agonist is not functional. sent3: the agonist is not functional if it skids firm and does not roughen aardwolf. sent4: that something is not sigmoid hold if it does not roughen aardwolf and does not skid firm. sent5: the snare does applique. sent6: the agonist is functional and it does roughen stinger if the primer does not extricate histoincompatibility. sent7: if the brew is not sigmoid then the fact that the sac is a kind of biographic thing that does extricate tracer is not true. sent8: something is a consumerism if it is a kind of a wise. sent9: the primer does not extricate histoincompatibility. sent10: The histoincompatibility does not extricate primer. sent11: that if something is a consumerism that is functional then the wordsmith does not skid firm is true. sent12: the agonist is a wise if the snare is a applique. sent13: if the wordsmith does not skid firm then the brew does not roughen aardwolf and it does not skid firm.
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the agonist is a wise.; sent8 -> int2: if the agonist is a wise it is a consumerism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the agonist is a consumerism.; sent6 & sent9 -> int4: the agonist is functional and it does roughen stinger.; int4 -> int5: the agonist is functional.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the agonist is a consumerism and functional.; int6 -> int7: something is a consumerism and is functional.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the wordsmith does not skid firm.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the brew does not roughen aardwolf and does not skid firm.; sent4 -> int10: the brew is not sigmoid if it does not roughen aardwolf and it does not skid firm.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the brew is not sigmoid.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the sac is biographic thing that extricates tracer.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sac is biographic thing that does extricate tracer is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a piecework and it does not extricate Webb then it does not bilk validity. sent2: that the snare is a applique or it is biographic or both hold if the agonist is not functional. sent3: the agonist is not functional if it skids firm and does not roughen aardwolf. sent4: that something is not sigmoid hold if it does not roughen aardwolf and does not skid firm. sent5: the snare does applique. sent6: the agonist is functional and it does roughen stinger if the primer does not extricate histoincompatibility. sent7: if the brew is not sigmoid then the fact that the sac is a kind of biographic thing that does extricate tracer is not true. sent8: something is a consumerism if it is a kind of a wise. sent9: the primer does not extricate histoincompatibility. sent10: The histoincompatibility does not extricate primer. sent11: that if something is a consumerism that is functional then the wordsmith does not skid firm is true. sent12: the agonist is a wise if the snare is a applique. sent13: if the wordsmith does not skid firm then the brew does not roughen aardwolf and it does not skid firm. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent5 -> int1: the agonist is a wise.; sent8 -> int2: if the agonist is a wise it is a consumerism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the agonist is a consumerism.; sent6 & sent9 -> int4: the agonist is functional and it does roughen stinger.; int4 -> int5: the agonist is functional.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the agonist is a consumerism and functional.; int6 -> int7: something is a consumerism and is functional.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the wordsmith does not skid firm.; int8 & sent13 -> int9: the brew does not roughen aardwolf and does not skid firm.; sent4 -> int10: the brew is not sigmoid if it does not roughen aardwolf and it does not skid firm.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the brew is not sigmoid.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__