that that something is crural or it is noncomprehensive or both is not wrong is incorrect.
sent1: if the toehold is not a kind of a thickness the blower is unpropitious but it is not inconvertible. sent2: the antiknock is not a thickness. sent3: the trickster is not ascomycetous if there is something such that it is not a Llullaillaco and it is autodidactic. sent4: something is not ascomycetous. sent5: the antiknock is crural if the blower is unpropitious and is not inconvertible. sent6: something is both not a Llullaillaco and autodidactic. sent7: if the toehold is a thickness then that the trickster is ascomycetous is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the toehold is a thickness is not wrong.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the trickster is ascomycetous.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the trickster is not ascomycetous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the toehold is not a thickness.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the blower is unpropitious and convertible.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the antiknock is crural.; int6 -> int7: the antiknock is not non-crural or noncomprehensive or both.; int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that something is crural or it is noncomprehensive or both is not wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the toehold is not a kind of a thickness the blower is unpropitious but it is not inconvertible. sent2: the antiknock is not a thickness. sent3: the trickster is not ascomycetous if there is something such that it is not a Llullaillaco and it is autodidactic. sent4: something is not ascomycetous. sent5: the antiknock is crural if the blower is unpropitious and is not inconvertible. sent6: something is both not a Llullaillaco and autodidactic. sent7: if the toehold is a thickness then that the trickster is ascomycetous is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the toehold is a thickness is not wrong.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the trickster is ascomycetous.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: the trickster is not ascomycetous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the toehold is not a thickness.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the blower is unpropitious and convertible.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the antiknock is crural.; int6 -> int7: the antiknock is not non-crural or noncomprehensive or both.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__