that the Boniface is not glorious and is not non-provincial is not true.
sent1: that the Cimarron is not nonsteroidal and it does not glamorize panatela is not correct if the fact that the FIG does not glamorize panatela hold. sent2: if the peeler is not a Orizaba the fact that the Boniface is not a Orizaba but it is glorious is not right. sent3: the peeler is mediated. sent4: the fact that the peeler is inner and does not madden flamenco does not hold if the bidet is not inner. sent5: the malacologist is not non-provincial if the inhalant is a non-provincial. sent6: if something is glorious it is inner. sent7: if the fact that the Boniface is not non-mediated is true the fact that the peeler is not a provincial is correct. sent8: the bidet either is not inner or does not glamorize Platonism or both. sent9: the fact that either something is not comfortable or it does madden flamenco or both is wrong if it is a kind of a Orizaba. sent10: the fact that if something does not glamorize Platonism and/or does not repent it is not a Orizaba is not false. sent11: if the inhalant is not glorious that that the Boniface is not glorious but it is provincial is true is wrong. sent12: either the Boniface is comfortable or it is non-provincial or both. sent13: if the fact that something maddens airfield and does not strike FIG is false then it does term. sent14: the bidet is not inner and/or it does not madden flamenco. sent15: the fact that the peeler does not strike flamenco and/or it is uncomfortable is true. sent16: if something is not inner it is both not glorious and not non-provincial. sent17: the fact that the inhalant does glamorize Platonism and it is mediated does not hold. sent18: something is not inner if the fact that it either is not comfortable or does madden flamenco or both does not hold. sent19: that the peeler does not strike FIG is right. sent20: that the inhalant does not barbarize and it is not multilateral does not hold. sent21: if the inhalant is glorious then the FIG is not nonsteroidal and it does not glamorize panatela. sent22: the Cimarron is not glorious and/or it is comfortable. sent23: if the fact that that the Cimarron is both not comfortable and not nonsteroidal is incorrect is not wrong then the bidet is not inner. sent24: something is not nonsteroidal or it is comfortable or both if it is provincial. sent25: something does not glamorize Platonism and/or it does not repent if it mediates. sent26: if the fact that something is inner but it does not madden flamenco does not hold it is a Orizaba. sent27: something is a Orizaba if it does repent. sent28: if the peeler does not repent then that the Cimarron repent and it is nonsteroidal is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inhalant is glorious.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the FIG is not nonsteroidal and does not glamorize panatela.; int1 -> int2: the FIG is not nonsteroidal.; sent26 -> int3: the peeler is a kind of a Orizaba if the fact that it is inner thing that does not madden flamenco is incorrect.; sent10 -> int4: the peeler is not a Orizaba if it does not glamorize Platonism or it does not repent or both.; sent25 -> int5: if the peeler mediates it does not glamorize Platonism and/or does not repent.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the peeler does not glamorize Platonism and/or it does not repent.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the peeler is not a Orizaba.;
the Boniface is not glorious but it is provincial.
sent16 -> int8: the Boniface is not glorious but it is provincial if the fact that it is not inner hold.; sent18 -> int9: if the fact that the Boniface is uncomfortable or it does madden flamenco or both is false then it is non-inner.; sent9 -> int10: the fact that the Boniface is not comfortable and/or does madden flamenco is not right if it is a kind of a Orizaba.; sent27 -> int11: if the Boniface repents it is a Orizaba.; sent17 -> int12: there is something such that that it glamorizes Platonism and does mediate is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Boniface is not glorious and is not non-provincial is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Cimarron is not nonsteroidal and it does not glamorize panatela is not correct if the fact that the FIG does not glamorize panatela hold. sent2: if the peeler is not a Orizaba the fact that the Boniface is not a Orizaba but it is glorious is not right. sent3: the peeler is mediated. sent4: the fact that the peeler is inner and does not madden flamenco does not hold if the bidet is not inner. sent5: the malacologist is not non-provincial if the inhalant is a non-provincial. sent6: if something is glorious it is inner. sent7: if the fact that the Boniface is not non-mediated is true the fact that the peeler is not a provincial is correct. sent8: the bidet either is not inner or does not glamorize Platonism or both. sent9: the fact that either something is not comfortable or it does madden flamenco or both is wrong if it is a kind of a Orizaba. sent10: the fact that if something does not glamorize Platonism and/or does not repent it is not a Orizaba is not false. sent11: if the inhalant is not glorious that that the Boniface is not glorious but it is provincial is true is wrong. sent12: either the Boniface is comfortable or it is non-provincial or both. sent13: if the fact that something maddens airfield and does not strike FIG is false then it does term. sent14: the bidet is not inner and/or it does not madden flamenco. sent15: the fact that the peeler does not strike flamenco and/or it is uncomfortable is true. sent16: if something is not inner it is both not glorious and not non-provincial. sent17: the fact that the inhalant does glamorize Platonism and it is mediated does not hold. sent18: something is not inner if the fact that it either is not comfortable or does madden flamenco or both does not hold. sent19: that the peeler does not strike FIG is right. sent20: that the inhalant does not barbarize and it is not multilateral does not hold. sent21: if the inhalant is glorious then the FIG is not nonsteroidal and it does not glamorize panatela. sent22: the Cimarron is not glorious and/or it is comfortable. sent23: if the fact that that the Cimarron is both not comfortable and not nonsteroidal is incorrect is not wrong then the bidet is not inner. sent24: something is not nonsteroidal or it is comfortable or both if it is provincial. sent25: something does not glamorize Platonism and/or it does not repent if it mediates. sent26: if the fact that something is inner but it does not madden flamenco does not hold it is a Orizaba. sent27: something is a Orizaba if it does repent. sent28: if the peeler does not repent then that the Cimarron repent and it is nonsteroidal is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inhalant is glorious.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the FIG is not nonsteroidal and does not glamorize panatela.; int1 -> int2: the FIG is not nonsteroidal.; sent26 -> int3: the peeler is a kind of a Orizaba if the fact that it is inner thing that does not madden flamenco is incorrect.; sent10 -> int4: the peeler is not a Orizaba if it does not glamorize Platonism or it does not repent or both.; sent25 -> int5: if the peeler mediates it does not glamorize Platonism and/or does not repent.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the peeler does not glamorize Platonism and/or it does not repent.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the peeler is not a Orizaba.; __UNKNOWN__