that the tang is altitudinal is not wrong.
sent1: if there is something such that it is a Franciscan and it does compartmentalize Seattle the tang is altitudinal. sent2: if the Pitot is unthematic the Ra is unthematic. sent3: if the fact that the Ra is not a specific or it is not unthematic or both does not hold then it is a colleen. sent4: the Ra is unthematic. sent5: if the Pitot is unthematic that the Ra is either nonspecific or not unthematic or both is not right. sent6: if the sacrificer is not a colleen and is not a specific the Ra is not ceric. sent7: if the anomalist is not a ignorantness or a copepod or both the sacrificer compartmentalizes Seattle. sent8: the sacrificer is a Franciscan if the Ra is a colleen. sent9: the fact that the Pitot is gastroesophageal or it is not unthematic or both does not hold if the Ra is not ceric. sent10: the anomalist is not a kind of a ignorantness and/or it is a kind of a copepod. sent11: there is something such that it is unthematic. sent12: there is something such that it is not gastroesophageal.
sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the sacrificer does compartmentalize Seattle.;
the tang is not altitudinal.
$hypothesis$ = that the tang is altitudinal is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is a Franciscan and it does compartmentalize Seattle the tang is altitudinal. sent2: if the Pitot is unthematic the Ra is unthematic. sent3: if the fact that the Ra is not a specific or it is not unthematic or both does not hold then it is a colleen. sent4: the Ra is unthematic. sent5: if the Pitot is unthematic that the Ra is either nonspecific or not unthematic or both is not right. sent6: if the sacrificer is not a colleen and is not a specific the Ra is not ceric. sent7: if the anomalist is not a ignorantness or a copepod or both the sacrificer compartmentalizes Seattle. sent8: the sacrificer is a Franciscan if the Ra is a colleen. sent9: the fact that the Pitot is gastroesophageal or it is not unthematic or both does not hold if the Ra is not ceric. sent10: the anomalist is not a kind of a ignorantness and/or it is a kind of a copepod. sent11: there is something such that it is unthematic. sent12: there is something such that it is not gastroesophageal. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the sacrificer does compartmentalize Seattle.; __UNKNOWN__