the debater is opposable.
sent1: if something that is not vernal premeditates BSE it is not a vice-regent. sent2: if the fluoxetine is non-fitter and it is not a kind of a Sufi the debater is opposable. sent3: if the debater is opposable but not bracteate then the cornmeal is atomistic. sent4: that everything is not paleocortical hold. sent5: something ventilates spoiler. sent6: that something is a kind of a shirttail and is a laureate is not correct if it is not paleocortical. sent7: if there is something such that it ventilates spoiler the fact that the lining is hadal but it does not ventilate artilleryman is not right. sent8: the fact that the fluoxetine is not a connectivity is not false if something that is atomistic is not bracteate. sent9: that the debater is not bracteate hold. sent10: the fact that the fluoxetine is opposable but it is not a kind of a Sufi is not right. sent11: the cornmeal is atomistic but it is not bracteate. sent12: the debater is not a fitter. sent13: something is a place that does premeditate BSE if it is not a kind of a laureate. sent14: if that the fluoxetine is not a kind of a connectivity and it is not atomistic does not hold then it is a fitter. sent15: there is something such that it is atomistic. sent16: if the Creek premeditates BSE then the leucothoe does premeditates BSE. sent17: if something either is a connectivity or is not opposable or both it is not opposable. sent18: the cornmeal is bracteate and it is atomistic if the leucothoe is not a vice-regent. sent19: the Creek is not a laureate if that the artilleryman is not a laureate is not false. sent20: if the fact that the turnaround is a shirttail and it is a laureate is not true the artilleryman is not a laureate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fluoxetine is not a fitter and not Sufi does not hold.; sent11 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is both not non-atomistic and non-bracteate is right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fluoxetine is not a connectivity.;
the debater is not opposable.
sent17 -> int3: the debater is not opposable if it is a kind of a connectivity and/or is not opposable.; sent1 -> int4: if the leucothoe is not vernal but it does premeditate BSE it is not a vice-regent.; sent6 -> int5: if the cantala is not paleocortical then the fact that it is a shirttail and it is a laureate is not correct.; sent4 -> int6: that the cantala is not paleocortical is not false.; int5 & int6 -> int7: that the cantala is a shirttail and it is a laureate is incorrect.; int7 -> int8: there exists nothing such that it is a shirttail and it is a kind of a laureate.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the turnaround is a kind of a shirttail and it is a laureate is wrong.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the artilleryman is not a laureate.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: the Creek is not a kind of a laureate.; sent13 -> int12: the Creek is a place and it premeditates BSE if it is not a laureate.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the Creek is a kind of a place that does premeditate BSE.; int13 -> int14: the Creek does premeditate BSE.; int14 & sent16 -> int15: the fact that the leucothoe does premeditate BSE is not wrong.; sent5 & sent7 -> int16: that the fact that that the lining is hadal but it does not ventilate artilleryman is not incorrect is not right hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the debater is opposable. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not vernal premeditates BSE it is not a vice-regent. sent2: if the fluoxetine is non-fitter and it is not a kind of a Sufi the debater is opposable. sent3: if the debater is opposable but not bracteate then the cornmeal is atomistic. sent4: that everything is not paleocortical hold. sent5: something ventilates spoiler. sent6: that something is a kind of a shirttail and is a laureate is not correct if it is not paleocortical. sent7: if there is something such that it ventilates spoiler the fact that the lining is hadal but it does not ventilate artilleryman is not right. sent8: the fact that the fluoxetine is not a connectivity is not false if something that is atomistic is not bracteate. sent9: that the debater is not bracteate hold. sent10: the fact that the fluoxetine is opposable but it is not a kind of a Sufi is not right. sent11: the cornmeal is atomistic but it is not bracteate. sent12: the debater is not a fitter. sent13: something is a place that does premeditate BSE if it is not a kind of a laureate. sent14: if that the fluoxetine is not a kind of a connectivity and it is not atomistic does not hold then it is a fitter. sent15: there is something such that it is atomistic. sent16: if the Creek premeditates BSE then the leucothoe does premeditates BSE. sent17: if something either is a connectivity or is not opposable or both it is not opposable. sent18: the cornmeal is bracteate and it is atomistic if the leucothoe is not a vice-regent. sent19: the Creek is not a laureate if that the artilleryman is not a laureate is not false. sent20: if the fact that the turnaround is a shirttail and it is a laureate is not true the artilleryman is not a laureate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fluoxetine is not a fitter and not Sufi does not hold.; sent11 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is both not non-atomistic and non-bracteate is right.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fluoxetine is not a connectivity.; __UNKNOWN__