the coloring does not unseal populism.
sent1: something is not dicotyledonous. sent2: the fact that the Mancunian does not bankrupt zeaxanthin hold. sent3: that the coloring does not unseal populism hold if there exists something such that it is not dicotyledonous and does not bankrupt zeaxanthin. sent4: if the nameko does not bankrupt zeaxanthin the fact that the Mancunian does not bankrupt zeaxanthin is right. sent5: if the nameko is Australasian thing that does not unseal sound then it does not bankrupt zeaxanthin. sent6: the nameko is Australasian and does not unseal sound. sent7: that something does bankrupt zeaxanthin but it is non-Australasian is correct. sent8: something that is not dicotyledonous either does bankrupt zeaxanthin or unseals populism or both. sent9: the Mancunian is not dicotyledonous and does not bankrupt zeaxanthin if the nameko does not bankrupt zeaxanthin.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the nameko does not bankrupt zeaxanthin.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the Mancunian is non-dicotyledonous and it does not bankrupt zeaxanthin.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of non-dicotyledonous thing that does not bankrupt zeaxanthin.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the coloring does unseal populism.
sent8 -> int4: if the nameko is not dicotyledonous then either it does bankrupt zeaxanthin or it unseals populism or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the coloring does not unseal populism. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not dicotyledonous. sent2: the fact that the Mancunian does not bankrupt zeaxanthin hold. sent3: that the coloring does not unseal populism hold if there exists something such that it is not dicotyledonous and does not bankrupt zeaxanthin. sent4: if the nameko does not bankrupt zeaxanthin the fact that the Mancunian does not bankrupt zeaxanthin is right. sent5: if the nameko is Australasian thing that does not unseal sound then it does not bankrupt zeaxanthin. sent6: the nameko is Australasian and does not unseal sound. sent7: that something does bankrupt zeaxanthin but it is non-Australasian is correct. sent8: something that is not dicotyledonous either does bankrupt zeaxanthin or unseals populism or both. sent9: the Mancunian is not dicotyledonous and does not bankrupt zeaxanthin if the nameko does not bankrupt zeaxanthin. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the nameko does not bankrupt zeaxanthin.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the Mancunian is non-dicotyledonous and it does not bankrupt zeaxanthin.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of non-dicotyledonous thing that does not bankrupt zeaxanthin.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__