the duster happens.
sent1: that the lashing does not occur is prevented by that the sequel and the non-Neanderthalness happens. sent2: that the malignantness does not occur is correct. sent3: the brooming carrageenin happens and/or the sequel occurs. sent4: if that the Cubanness happens and/or the canfield happens is not false then the litigiousness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the canfield happens and the souring happens is not right if the ultimateness does not occur. sent6: that the malignantness does not occur is not incorrect if the asymmetricalness does not occur. sent7: the peasanthood and the non-unavailableness happens. sent8: the asymmetricalness does not occur. sent9: if the ultimateness occurs that the underpayment does not occur and the fishiness does not occur is wrong. sent10: the fact that the litigiousness does not occur but the canfield occurs is not correct if the Cubanness does not occur. sent11: both the bestrewing squeal and the non-malignantness happens if the asymmetricalness does not occur. sent12: the canfield happens if the fact that the underpayment happens hold. sent13: the bestrewing squeal and the non-Cubanness happens if the malignantness happens. sent14: the fact that the duster does not occur hold if the fact that both the canfield and the ultimate happens does not hold. sent15: that both the malignantness and the asymmetricalness happens is brought about by the non-medicolegalness. sent16: that the litigiousness does not occur is caused by that the Cubanness happens. sent17: the fact that the underpayment happens and the fishiness does not occur is incorrect. sent18: that not the bestrewing squeal but the litigiousness happens is not correct if the duster does not occur. sent19: if that the underpayment does not occur and the fishiness does not occur is false then the canfield occurs. sent20: the fact that the malignantness happens but the asymmetricalness does not occur does not hold if the medicolegalness occurs. sent21: the ultimateness occurs. sent22: the stead but not the algometry happens. sent23: if the ultimate happens that the underpayment and the non-fishiness occurs does not hold. sent24: that the duster does not occur is prevented by that the bestrewing squeal occurs but the litigiousness does not occur. sent25: either the inefficientness occurs or the partition occurs or both. sent26: if the fact that the canfield and the souring happens is not right then the fact that the souring does not occur hold.
sent9 & sent21 -> int1: that the underpayment does not occur and the fishiness does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the canfield occurs.; int2 -> int3: the Cubanness and/or the canfield occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the litigiousness does not occur.; sent11 & sent8 -> int5: the bestrewing squeal occurs and the malignantness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the bestrewing squeal occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the bestrewing squeal and the non-litigiousness happens.; int7 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the duster does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the duster happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the lashing does not occur is prevented by that the sequel and the non-Neanderthalness happens. sent2: that the malignantness does not occur is correct. sent3: the brooming carrageenin happens and/or the sequel occurs. sent4: if that the Cubanness happens and/or the canfield happens is not false then the litigiousness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the canfield happens and the souring happens is not right if the ultimateness does not occur. sent6: that the malignantness does not occur is not incorrect if the asymmetricalness does not occur. sent7: the peasanthood and the non-unavailableness happens. sent8: the asymmetricalness does not occur. sent9: if the ultimateness occurs that the underpayment does not occur and the fishiness does not occur is wrong. sent10: the fact that the litigiousness does not occur but the canfield occurs is not correct if the Cubanness does not occur. sent11: both the bestrewing squeal and the non-malignantness happens if the asymmetricalness does not occur. sent12: the canfield happens if the fact that the underpayment happens hold. sent13: the bestrewing squeal and the non-Cubanness happens if the malignantness happens. sent14: the fact that the duster does not occur hold if the fact that both the canfield and the ultimate happens does not hold. sent15: that both the malignantness and the asymmetricalness happens is brought about by the non-medicolegalness. sent16: that the litigiousness does not occur is caused by that the Cubanness happens. sent17: the fact that the underpayment happens and the fishiness does not occur is incorrect. sent18: that not the bestrewing squeal but the litigiousness happens is not correct if the duster does not occur. sent19: if that the underpayment does not occur and the fishiness does not occur is false then the canfield occurs. sent20: the fact that the malignantness happens but the asymmetricalness does not occur does not hold if the medicolegalness occurs. sent21: the ultimateness occurs. sent22: the stead but not the algometry happens. sent23: if the ultimate happens that the underpayment and the non-fishiness occurs does not hold. sent24: that the duster does not occur is prevented by that the bestrewing squeal occurs but the litigiousness does not occur. sent25: either the inefficientness occurs or the partition occurs or both. sent26: if the fact that the canfield and the souring happens is not right then the fact that the souring does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent21 -> int1: that the underpayment does not occur and the fishiness does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the canfield occurs.; int2 -> int3: the Cubanness and/or the canfield occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the litigiousness does not occur.; sent11 & sent8 -> int5: the bestrewing squeal occurs and the malignantness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the bestrewing squeal occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: both the bestrewing squeal and the non-litigiousness happens.; int7 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__