the seamanlikeness but not the waxing occurs.
sent1: the negotiating Padda does not occur. sent2: the fact that the ventilation and the hyphenation occurs does not hold. sent3: the waxing does not occur if the Hell occurs. sent4: that the seamanlikeness happens but the negotiating Padda does not occur is triggered by that the anatomy does not occur. sent5: the anatomy does not occur if the Light and the perturbation happens. sent6: if that the Hell does not occur is true then the fact that the beholding tongue does not occur hold. sent7: the Light occurs if that the residualness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: if the beholding tongue does not occur the fact that the seamanlikeness but not the waxing happens is not right. sent9: that the gig happens causes the Light. sent10: if the fact that the biting but not the reporting patroller happens is false then that the misappropriation does not occur is correct. sent11: that the amortization and the reporting healthfulness happens is false. sent12: the blitz does not occur. sent13: that both the seamanlikeness and the waxing occurs is not right. sent14: the misappropriation happens if the negotiating Padda does not occur. sent15: the Hell does not occur if the biting but not the reporting patroller occurs. sent16: the gig or the residual or both occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bit happens but the reporting patroller does not occur does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the misappropriation does not occur.; sent14 & sent1 -> int2: the misappropriation happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bit occurs and the reporting patroller does not occur.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the Hell does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the beholding tongue does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the seamanlikeness happens and the waxing does not occur.
sent16 & sent9 & sent7 -> int7: the Light happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the seamanlikeness but not the waxing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the negotiating Padda does not occur. sent2: the fact that the ventilation and the hyphenation occurs does not hold. sent3: the waxing does not occur if the Hell occurs. sent4: that the seamanlikeness happens but the negotiating Padda does not occur is triggered by that the anatomy does not occur. sent5: the anatomy does not occur if the Light and the perturbation happens. sent6: if that the Hell does not occur is true then the fact that the beholding tongue does not occur hold. sent7: the Light occurs if that the residualness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: if the beholding tongue does not occur the fact that the seamanlikeness but not the waxing happens is not right. sent9: that the gig happens causes the Light. sent10: if the fact that the biting but not the reporting patroller happens is false then that the misappropriation does not occur is correct. sent11: that the amortization and the reporting healthfulness happens is false. sent12: the blitz does not occur. sent13: that both the seamanlikeness and the waxing occurs is not right. sent14: the misappropriation happens if the negotiating Padda does not occur. sent15: the Hell does not occur if the biting but not the reporting patroller occurs. sent16: the gig or the residual or both occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bit happens but the reporting patroller does not occur does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the misappropriation does not occur.; sent14 & sent1 -> int2: the misappropriation happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bit occurs and the reporting patroller does not occur.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the Hell does not occur.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the beholding tongue does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__