not the lecturing but the introversiveness happens.
sent1: if the fact that the lecturing does not occur but the introversiveness happens does not hold the racism occurs. sent2: the Erasmianness does not occur. sent3: the revaluing happens if the patterning xylene happens. sent4: the vulvarness happens. sent5: that the Sunnah occurs is correct. sent6: the patterning xylene happens. sent7: the fact that the singling barricaded occurs and the violableness happens is incorrect if the extropicness does not occur. sent8: the fact that not the sensationalness but the clouding occurs is incorrect. sent9: the lecture does not occur. sent10: that the sensationalness occurs and the apophaticness happens does not hold if the fact that the embarrassment does not occur is not false. sent11: the sensationalness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the stroking tremolite does not occur and the stroking Epidendrum occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that the incompetent does not occur is correct. sent14: the singling schottische occurs if the bicycling waker occurs. sent15: that the neutrality occurs if the apophaticness happens is correct. sent16: the lacrimalness happens. sent17: if the fact that the extropicness occurs and the shimmer happens does not hold then the extropicness does not occur. sent18: the racism happens if the lecturing happens. sent19: if the fact that the stroking polarography and the spoil occurs is not correct the stroking polarography does not occur. sent20: that not the singling anathematization but the collateral occurs is false. sent21: the stroking crus does not occur but the exclusion occurs. sent22: the waving does not occur. sent23: that the lecturing occurs and the introversiveness happens is incorrect. sent24: if the Erasmianness does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the stroking polarography and the spoiling occurs is not correct hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the lecturing does not occur and the introversiveness happens is false.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the racism happens.; sent24 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the stroking polarography happens and the spoiling occurs does not hold.; sent19 & int2 -> int3: the stroking polarography does not occur.;
the fact that the lecturing does not occur but the introversiveness occurs is incorrect.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the lecturing but the introversiveness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the lecturing does not occur but the introversiveness happens does not hold the racism occurs. sent2: the Erasmianness does not occur. sent3: the revaluing happens if the patterning xylene happens. sent4: the vulvarness happens. sent5: that the Sunnah occurs is correct. sent6: the patterning xylene happens. sent7: the fact that the singling barricaded occurs and the violableness happens is incorrect if the extropicness does not occur. sent8: the fact that not the sensationalness but the clouding occurs is incorrect. sent9: the lecture does not occur. sent10: that the sensationalness occurs and the apophaticness happens does not hold if the fact that the embarrassment does not occur is not false. sent11: the sensationalness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the stroking tremolite does not occur and the stroking Epidendrum occurs does not hold. sent13: the fact that the incompetent does not occur is correct. sent14: the singling schottische occurs if the bicycling waker occurs. sent15: that the neutrality occurs if the apophaticness happens is correct. sent16: the lacrimalness happens. sent17: if the fact that the extropicness occurs and the shimmer happens does not hold then the extropicness does not occur. sent18: the racism happens if the lecturing happens. sent19: if the fact that the stroking polarography and the spoil occurs is not correct the stroking polarography does not occur. sent20: that not the singling anathematization but the collateral occurs is false. sent21: the stroking crus does not occur but the exclusion occurs. sent22: the waving does not occur. sent23: that the lecturing occurs and the introversiveness happens is incorrect. sent24: if the Erasmianness does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the stroking polarography and the spoiling occurs is not correct hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the lecturing does not occur and the introversiveness happens is false.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the racism happens.; sent24 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the stroking polarography happens and the spoiling occurs does not hold.; sent19 & int2 -> int3: the stroking polarography does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__