there is something such that if that it is a impeccability and it is a kind of a daughter is incorrect it is not baboonish.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a impeccability that is a daughter then it is non-baboonish. sent2: that the clingfilm is not baboonish is not wrong if the fact that it does trumpet and it disguises fluoridation is incorrect. sent3: if that the pegmatite is both a periselene and not non-baboonish is not true it is not evaporative. sent4: the freight does not clap clingfilm if that it is allopathic and is a impeccability is not correct. sent5: the pegmatite is baboonish if that it is a impeccability and a daughter does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a washboard and it is surficial is wrong then it is not a volatile. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a impeccability then it is not baboonish. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a daughter then the fact that it is baboonish is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that that the pegmatite is a kind of a daughter and it is a kind of a chatterbox is right is not correct it does not clap bearer. sent10: something is not a ampleness if that it does clap matron and it does julienne oxygenation does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if that it is disreputable and it does julienne Irena is not correct then it is not a kind of a Alexandrine. sent12: if that the pegmatite is both a impeccability and a daughter is wrong then the fact that it is not baboonish is right. sent13: something is not a siltstone if that it is both a truck and a Bruno is wrong. sent14: if the pegmatite is a impeccability and is a daughter then the fact that it is not baboonish is correct. sent15: the pegmatite is not baboonish if it is not a impeccability. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is a impeccability and it is a daughter is not true it is baboonish. sent17: if the fact that something is a Ur and it is baboonish is not correct that it is not a kind of an emulation is right. sent18: the pegmatite does not julienne bitternut if the fact that it is a daughter and is not nontranslational does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is Sikh and it is a kind of a concerned is not right it is not incomplete. sent20: if the pegmatite is not surficial it does not disguise certification.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
that there is something such that if the fact that it is a truck that is a kind of a Bruno does not hold then it is not a siltstone is not incorrect.
sent13 -> int1: if that the crystallite does truck and is a Bruno is not correct it is not a siltstone.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a impeccability and it is a kind of a daughter is incorrect it is not baboonish. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a impeccability that is a daughter then it is non-baboonish. sent2: that the clingfilm is not baboonish is not wrong if the fact that it does trumpet and it disguises fluoridation is incorrect. sent3: if that the pegmatite is both a periselene and not non-baboonish is not true it is not evaporative. sent4: the freight does not clap clingfilm if that it is allopathic and is a impeccability is not correct. sent5: the pegmatite is baboonish if that it is a impeccability and a daughter does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a washboard and it is surficial is wrong then it is not a volatile. sent7: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a impeccability then it is not baboonish. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a daughter then the fact that it is baboonish is incorrect. sent9: if the fact that that the pegmatite is a kind of a daughter and it is a kind of a chatterbox is right is not correct it does not clap bearer. sent10: something is not a ampleness if that it does clap matron and it does julienne oxygenation does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if that it is disreputable and it does julienne Irena is not correct then it is not a kind of a Alexandrine. sent12: if that the pegmatite is both a impeccability and a daughter is wrong then the fact that it is not baboonish is right. sent13: something is not a siltstone if that it is both a truck and a Bruno is wrong. sent14: if the pegmatite is a impeccability and is a daughter then the fact that it is not baboonish is correct. sent15: the pegmatite is not baboonish if it is not a impeccability. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is a impeccability and it is a daughter is not true it is baboonish. sent17: if the fact that something is a Ur and it is baboonish is not correct that it is not a kind of an emulation is right. sent18: the pegmatite does not julienne bitternut if the fact that it is a daughter and is not nontranslational does not hold. sent19: there exists something such that if the fact that it is Sikh and it is a kind of a concerned is not right it is not incomplete. sent20: if the pegmatite is not surficial it does not disguise certification. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__