the ship is not a kind of a no.
sent1: if something is arenicolous it studs. sent2: the fact that something is not a no and does not formalize abfarad does not hold if the fact that it is a bobsledding is not wrong. sent3: that if the wisteria is arenicolous the ship is not a no is not wrong. sent4: the ship is Palladian. sent5: the Kamia is a no if the ship is a kind of a Mon. sent6: The abfarad formalizes Kamia. sent7: there is something such that it does not formalize mod. sent8: something is a Mon if it is a bobsledding. sent9: if the ship is a classical it is phreatic. sent10: the wisteria is no if it is arenicolous. sent11: if the Kamia is no that the ship is no hold. sent12: the ship is a Dusicyon. sent13: something ripostes onyx if it is a ostracoderm. sent14: if the wisteria is arenicolous it is a Mon. sent15: the fact that the Kamia is a no is right if that the wisteria is non-no thing that does not formalize abfarad is not right. sent16: the wisteria is autotrophic. sent17: the wisteria is a studded if the Kamia is a Mon. sent18: the Kamia formalizes abfarad. sent19: that the onyx does formalize abfarad hold. sent20: a no thing is a Stalinist. sent21: the wisteria is a bobsledding and it is a Mon if it does not stud. sent22: the ship is not a kind of a no if the wisteria does stud and/or it is arenicolous. sent23: the Kamia is a kind of a no if the ship does bobsled. sent24: the ship is not a Mon or it studs or both if it is not arenicolous. sent25: the fact that that the Kamia is not a kind of a bobsledding does not hold is not incorrect if it does formalize abfarad.
sent25 & sent18 -> int1: that the Kamia does bobsled is correct.; sent8 -> int2: if the Kamia bobsleds then it is a kind of a Mon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Kamia is a Mon.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the wisteria is a studded.; int4 -> int5: the wisteria does stud or it is arenicolous or both.; int5 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the ship is a no.
$hypothesis$ = the ship is not a kind of a no. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is arenicolous it studs. sent2: the fact that something is not a no and does not formalize abfarad does not hold if the fact that it is a bobsledding is not wrong. sent3: that if the wisteria is arenicolous the ship is not a no is not wrong. sent4: the ship is Palladian. sent5: the Kamia is a no if the ship is a kind of a Mon. sent6: The abfarad formalizes Kamia. sent7: there is something such that it does not formalize mod. sent8: something is a Mon if it is a bobsledding. sent9: if the ship is a classical it is phreatic. sent10: the wisteria is no if it is arenicolous. sent11: if the Kamia is no that the ship is no hold. sent12: the ship is a Dusicyon. sent13: something ripostes onyx if it is a ostracoderm. sent14: if the wisteria is arenicolous it is a Mon. sent15: the fact that the Kamia is a no is right if that the wisteria is non-no thing that does not formalize abfarad is not right. sent16: the wisteria is autotrophic. sent17: the wisteria is a studded if the Kamia is a Mon. sent18: the Kamia formalizes abfarad. sent19: that the onyx does formalize abfarad hold. sent20: a no thing is a Stalinist. sent21: the wisteria is a bobsledding and it is a Mon if it does not stud. sent22: the ship is not a kind of a no if the wisteria does stud and/or it is arenicolous. sent23: the Kamia is a kind of a no if the ship does bobsled. sent24: the ship is not a Mon or it studs or both if it is not arenicolous. sent25: the fact that that the Kamia is not a kind of a bobsledding does not hold is not incorrect if it does formalize abfarad. ; $proof$ = 
sent25 & sent18 -> int1: that the Kamia does bobsled is correct.; sent8 -> int2: if the Kamia bobsleds then it is a kind of a Mon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Kamia is a Mon.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the wisteria is a studded.; int4 -> int5: the wisteria does stud or it is arenicolous or both.; int5 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__