that the canyon is a groundhog hold.
sent1: that the precipitin is uninformative thing that belabors quadruplet does not hold. sent2: that the bryanthus is not a gynobase and is a Carthusian is false. sent3: if that something belabors oblong and it belabors quadruplet is wrong it is not uninformative. sent4: if something is a groundhog it is unconquerable. sent5: if that something is a headstand and/or it does philander pacer is false then it is not azo. sent6: the canyon does not philander pacer. sent7: if the precipitin does not belabor quadruplet the Elizabethan is not uninformative. sent8: if the Elizabethan is informative the canyon does not philander pacer. sent9: if that the bryanthus is not a gynobase but it is Carthusian is incorrect the basket does not catapult blunder. sent10: the canyon is not uninformative if that the Elizabethan is uninformative and it is azo does not hold. sent11: if the precipitin does not philander pacer then the fact that the Elizabethan is unconquerable or azo or both is correct. sent12: the canyon is a kind of a groundhog if the Elizabethan is unconquerable. sent13: if something is a headstand it belabors quadruplet. sent14: that the canyon is a headstand and/or it does philander pacer is false if the Elizabethan is not uninformative. sent15: something is azo if it is unconquerable. sent16: the quadruplet is azo if it is indelicate. sent17: the fact that the precipitin specks and/or it does philander pacer is not true. sent18: the Elizabethan is not uninformative if the fact that the precipitin is uninformative and it belabors quadruplet is not correct.
sent4 -> int1: if that the canyon is a groundhog is true then it is unconquerable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canyon is a groundhog.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the canyon is unconquerable.; sent15 -> int3: the canyon is azo if it is unconquerable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the canyon is azo.; sent5 -> int5: the canyon is not azo if that either it is a kind of a headstand or it philanders pacer or both is not correct.; sent18 & sent1 -> int6: the Elizabethan is not uninformative.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the canyon either is a headstand or does philander pacer or both is wrong.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the canyon is not azo.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the canyon is a groundhog.
sent3 -> int10: the precipitin is not uninformative if that it does belabor oblong and it belabors quadruplet is not true.; sent9 & sent2 -> int11: the basket does not catapult blunder.; int11 -> int12: something does not catapult blunder.;
$hypothesis$ = that the canyon is a groundhog hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the precipitin is uninformative thing that belabors quadruplet does not hold. sent2: that the bryanthus is not a gynobase and is a Carthusian is false. sent3: if that something belabors oblong and it belabors quadruplet is wrong it is not uninformative. sent4: if something is a groundhog it is unconquerable. sent5: if that something is a headstand and/or it does philander pacer is false then it is not azo. sent6: the canyon does not philander pacer. sent7: if the precipitin does not belabor quadruplet the Elizabethan is not uninformative. sent8: if the Elizabethan is informative the canyon does not philander pacer. sent9: if that the bryanthus is not a gynobase but it is Carthusian is incorrect the basket does not catapult blunder. sent10: the canyon is not uninformative if that the Elizabethan is uninformative and it is azo does not hold. sent11: if the precipitin does not philander pacer then the fact that the Elizabethan is unconquerable or azo or both is correct. sent12: the canyon is a kind of a groundhog if the Elizabethan is unconquerable. sent13: if something is a headstand it belabors quadruplet. sent14: that the canyon is a headstand and/or it does philander pacer is false if the Elizabethan is not uninformative. sent15: something is azo if it is unconquerable. sent16: the quadruplet is azo if it is indelicate. sent17: the fact that the precipitin specks and/or it does philander pacer is not true. sent18: the Elizabethan is not uninformative if the fact that the precipitin is uninformative and it belabors quadruplet is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if that the canyon is a groundhog is true then it is unconquerable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canyon is a groundhog.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the canyon is unconquerable.; sent15 -> int3: the canyon is azo if it is unconquerable.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the canyon is azo.; sent5 -> int5: the canyon is not azo if that either it is a kind of a headstand or it philanders pacer or both is not correct.; sent18 & sent1 -> int6: the Elizabethan is not uninformative.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the canyon either is a headstand or does philander pacer or both is wrong.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the canyon is not azo.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__