that if the thalassicness happens the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the betteringness but not the lining happens. sent2: the thalassicness does not occur if the fact that the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur is not true. sent3: if the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur then the thalassicness does not occur. sent4: the irresistibleness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the non-Vienneseness and the non-chimericalness happens is true is not true. sent5: the thalassicness brings about that the betteringness but not the lining happens. sent6: the thalassicness does not occur if that the bettering occurs and the lining does not occur is not correct. sent7: the apiarianness does not occur. sent8: if the clangoring extinction occurs the clangoring Florey occurs. sent9: if both the non-thalassicness and the non-allomerousness happens the clangoring extinction happens. sent10: the lining does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the non-betteringness and the lining occurs is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur is correct is not true.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the thalassicness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the thalassicness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the clangoring Florey happens.
$hypothesis$ = that if the thalassicness happens the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the betteringness but not the lining happens. sent2: the thalassicness does not occur if the fact that the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur is not true. sent3: if the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur then the thalassicness does not occur. sent4: the irresistibleness does not occur if the fact that the fact that the non-Vienneseness and the non-chimericalness happens is true is not true. sent5: the thalassicness brings about that the betteringness but not the lining happens. sent6: the thalassicness does not occur if that the bettering occurs and the lining does not occur is not correct. sent7: the apiarianness does not occur. sent8: if the clangoring extinction occurs the clangoring Florey occurs. sent9: if both the non-thalassicness and the non-allomerousness happens the clangoring extinction happens. sent10: the lining does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the non-betteringness and the lining occurs is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur is correct is not true.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the thalassicness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the thalassicness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the bettering does not occur and the lining does not occur.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__