the fact that either the lentil is a worse or it interlocks penni or both is not right.
sent1: if that something is both a farkleberry and not a checkpoint does not hold then it is a checkpoint. sent2: the lentil is a kind of a farkleberry if there exists something such that that it does not jumble inconclusiveness and it is not a Derain is incorrect. sent3: if something is a kind of a farkleberry then it is a worse. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not jumble inconclusiveness and is not a kind of a Derain is false.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the lentil is a kind of a farkleberry.; sent3 -> int2: if the lentil is a kind of a farkleberry then it is a worse.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lentil is a kind of a worse.; int3 -> hypothesis;
either the codefendant is a tropics or it is a checkpoint or both.
sent1 -> int4: the codefendant is a kind of a checkpoint if that it is a kind of a farkleberry and it is not a checkpoint does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the lentil is a worse or it interlocks penni or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is both a farkleberry and not a checkpoint does not hold then it is a checkpoint. sent2: the lentil is a kind of a farkleberry if there exists something such that that it does not jumble inconclusiveness and it is not a Derain is incorrect. sent3: if something is a kind of a farkleberry then it is a worse. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it does not jumble inconclusiveness and is not a kind of a Derain is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the lentil is a kind of a farkleberry.; sent3 -> int2: if the lentil is a kind of a farkleberry then it is a worse.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lentil is a kind of a worse.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__