the ramipril is not a Murrow.
sent1: the ramipril is a Bloemfontein. sent2: if the hollyhock is not a stand the ramipril is a kind of a Murrow and it is a Bloemfontein. sent3: the hollyhock is a Bloemfontein. sent4: the fact that the notepad is a graphics and it is a kind of a brachycephaly is not true. sent5: if that something does not redden cover and is a kind of a stand does not hold it is not a Murrow. sent6: that the hollyhock does not stand is not wrong. sent7: the meltdown is not a kind of a stand. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a graphics the hollyhock does burn and it does redden cover. sent9: the fact that the ramipril is a Bloemfontein is not incorrect if the hollyhock is not a stand. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a graphics and it is a brachycephaly does not hold then the cicada is not a graphics.
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the ramipril is a Murrow and it is a kind of a Bloemfontein.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the ramipril is not a Murrow is right.
sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the ramipril does not redden cover but it is a kind of a stand is not true then it is not a kind of a Murrow.; sent4 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a graphics and it is a brachycephaly is not correct.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the cicada is not a graphics.; int4 -> int5: there are non-graphics things.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the hollyhock burns and it does redden cover.; int6 -> int7: the hollyhock reddens cover.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it does redden cover is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the ramipril is not a Murrow. ; $context$ = sent1: the ramipril is a Bloemfontein. sent2: if the hollyhock is not a stand the ramipril is a kind of a Murrow and it is a Bloemfontein. sent3: the hollyhock is a Bloemfontein. sent4: the fact that the notepad is a graphics and it is a kind of a brachycephaly is not true. sent5: if that something does not redden cover and is a kind of a stand does not hold it is not a Murrow. sent6: that the hollyhock does not stand is not wrong. sent7: the meltdown is not a kind of a stand. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a graphics the hollyhock does burn and it does redden cover. sent9: the fact that the ramipril is a Bloemfontein is not incorrect if the hollyhock is not a stand. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is a graphics and it is a brachycephaly does not hold then the cicada is not a graphics. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent6 -> int1: the ramipril is a Murrow and it is a kind of a Bloemfontein.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__