the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does not rerun pterodactyl is right then that it is a mainstream is true is incorrect.
sent1: if the saddlebill does not rerun pterodactyl it smacks. sent2: if something is not a controlled then it reruns pterodactyl. sent3: if the BAR is not a vampire it is a mainstream. sent4: there is something such that if it does rerun pterodactyl it is a mainstream. sent5: the saddlebill is a mainstream if it reruns pterodactyl. sent6: if the saddlebill does not rerun pterodactyl it is a mainstream. sent7: the isoagglutination does rerun pterodactyl if it is not artifactual. sent8: the fact that the saddlebill protests inverse is right if it does not rerun combined.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the cookfire is not a controlled is correct then it reruns pterodactyl.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it does not rerun pterodactyl is right then that it is a mainstream is true is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the saddlebill does not rerun pterodactyl it smacks. sent2: if something is not a controlled then it reruns pterodactyl. sent3: if the BAR is not a vampire it is a mainstream. sent4: there is something such that if it does rerun pterodactyl it is a mainstream. sent5: the saddlebill is a mainstream if it reruns pterodactyl. sent6: if the saddlebill does not rerun pterodactyl it is a mainstream. sent7: the isoagglutination does rerun pterodactyl if it is not artifactual. sent8: the fact that the saddlebill protests inverse is right if it does not rerun combined. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__