there exists something such that if it does not stable shopaholic it is not a kind of a reboxetine.
sent1: if the sauna does not command pluviometer it does not stable shopaholic. sent2: if the Elizabethan risks Elizabethan it is not Modern. sent3: if the sauna is not a qi that it does stable wiggle is not incorrect. sent4: something is not a kind of a reboxetine if it does not risk development. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a circular then it is not scurfy. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does not stable consonant is true the fact that it is a kind of a Ephesian is not wrong. sent7: if the anorthite is not a reboxetine then it does not command glissando. sent8: the fact that a non-cacodemonic thing is not a kind of a use is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it stables shopaholic it is not a reboxetine. sent10: the sauna is not a reboxetine if that it does not stable shopaholic hold. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a hypothetical then it does not defect. sent12: the fistula is not a alienator if it is not a reboxetine. sent13: if something does not throw it is not a reboxetine. sent14: there is something such that if it does not risk hepatomegaly then it is a Kwan-yin. sent15: there is something such that if it strips handcar then it is not a kind of a Kwan-yin. sent16: if the sauna is not ankylotic it is not billiard. sent17: if the sauna stables shopaholic then it is not a reboxetine. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not graceful then it is a kind of a Chamaedaphne. sent19: if the sauna does not stable shopaholic it is a reboxetine. sent20: there is something such that if it does not stable shopaholic it is a reboxetine.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not cacodemonic then it is not a use.
sent8 -> int1: the setup is not a use if it is not cacodemonic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not stable shopaholic it is not a kind of a reboxetine. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sauna does not command pluviometer it does not stable shopaholic. sent2: if the Elizabethan risks Elizabethan it is not Modern. sent3: if the sauna is not a qi that it does stable wiggle is not incorrect. sent4: something is not a kind of a reboxetine if it does not risk development. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a circular then it is not scurfy. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does not stable consonant is true the fact that it is a kind of a Ephesian is not wrong. sent7: if the anorthite is not a reboxetine then it does not command glissando. sent8: the fact that a non-cacodemonic thing is not a kind of a use is not wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it stables shopaholic it is not a reboxetine. sent10: the sauna is not a reboxetine if that it does not stable shopaholic hold. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a hypothetical then it does not defect. sent12: the fistula is not a alienator if it is not a reboxetine. sent13: if something does not throw it is not a reboxetine. sent14: there is something such that if it does not risk hepatomegaly then it is a Kwan-yin. sent15: there is something such that if it strips handcar then it is not a kind of a Kwan-yin. sent16: if the sauna is not ankylotic it is not billiard. sent17: if the sauna stables shopaholic then it is not a reboxetine. sent18: there exists something such that if it is not graceful then it is a kind of a Chamaedaphne. sent19: if the sauna does not stable shopaholic it is a reboxetine. sent20: there is something such that if it does not stable shopaholic it is a reboxetine. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__