the charge does not untune elsholtzia.
sent1: if something does not untune punctum then the fact that the dayboy untunes dallisgrass and is a arduousness is not incorrect. sent2: the charge does untune elsholtzia if the slope untune elsholtzia. sent3: The punctum does untune slope. sent4: the slope untunes dallisgrass if the dayboy untunes dallisgrass. sent5: the slope is a kind of a prostate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a prostate and is deductive is not true. sent6: there exists something such that that it is not a brutalization and it clings Peromyscus is incorrect. sent7: if there exists something such that that it untunes elsholtzia and it is not a apostasy does not hold the dallisgrass is a kind of a apostasy. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of non-prostate thing that is not non-deductive is false if it is a apostasy. sent9: something slackens if it does uglify. sent10: the fact that the modifier is non-dermatologic thing that untunes punctum is false if the heteroploid slackens. sent11: that the dallisgrass does not slacken and is not deductive is false if the dayboy is not a kind of a apostasy. sent12: there exists something such that it is a arduousness. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a brutalization and it does cling Peromyscus is incorrect then the charge is a kind of a brutalization. sent14: if the acetal is a paleolith the heteroploid is a kind of a brutalization. sent15: if the dallisgrass is dermatologic the charge does uglify. sent16: the slope does untune punctum. sent17: there is something such that that it untunes elsholtzia and is not a kind of a apostasy is not true. sent18: the fact that the heteroploid uglifies is correct if it is a kind of a brutalization. sent19: the dallisgrass is dermatologic if it slackens. sent20: if something is a prostate then it misremembers acetal. sent21: the acetal is a paleolith or it does cling Peromyscus or both. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that it is a brutalization and it does cling Peromyscus does not hold. sent23: if the fact that the dallisgrass does not slacken and is not deductive is wrong then that it is dermatologic is right. sent24: the dayboy is not a apostasy if a arduousness untunes punctum. sent25: the charge does not untune elsholtzia if it is a kind of a brutalization and it uglifies. sent26: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-dermatologic thing that does untune punctum is incorrect the charge does not untune punctum.
sent6 & sent13 -> int1: the charge is a kind of a brutalization.;
there is something such that it misremembers acetal and does untune dallisgrass.
sent20 -> int2: if the slope is a prostate it does misremember acetal.; sent8 -> int3: if the dallisgrass is a apostasy then the fact that it is not a kind of a prostate and it is deductive is incorrect.; sent17 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the dallisgrass is a kind of a apostasy hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the dallisgrass is both not a prostate and deductive is incorrect.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a prostate and is not non-deductive does not hold.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the slope is a kind of a prostate.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the slope does misremember acetal.; sent9 -> int9: the heteroploid slackens if the fact that it uglifies is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the charge does not untune elsholtzia. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not untune punctum then the fact that the dayboy untunes dallisgrass and is a arduousness is not incorrect. sent2: the charge does untune elsholtzia if the slope untune elsholtzia. sent3: The punctum does untune slope. sent4: the slope untunes dallisgrass if the dayboy untunes dallisgrass. sent5: the slope is a kind of a prostate if there is something such that the fact that it is not a prostate and is deductive is not true. sent6: there exists something such that that it is not a brutalization and it clings Peromyscus is incorrect. sent7: if there exists something such that that it untunes elsholtzia and it is not a apostasy does not hold the dallisgrass is a kind of a apostasy. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of non-prostate thing that is not non-deductive is false if it is a apostasy. sent9: something slackens if it does uglify. sent10: the fact that the modifier is non-dermatologic thing that untunes punctum is false if the heteroploid slackens. sent11: that the dallisgrass does not slacken and is not deductive is false if the dayboy is not a kind of a apostasy. sent12: there exists something such that it is a arduousness. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a brutalization and it does cling Peromyscus is incorrect then the charge is a kind of a brutalization. sent14: if the acetal is a paleolith the heteroploid is a kind of a brutalization. sent15: if the dallisgrass is dermatologic the charge does uglify. sent16: the slope does untune punctum. sent17: there is something such that that it untunes elsholtzia and is not a kind of a apostasy is not true. sent18: the fact that the heteroploid uglifies is correct if it is a kind of a brutalization. sent19: the dallisgrass is dermatologic if it slackens. sent20: if something is a prostate then it misremembers acetal. sent21: the acetal is a paleolith or it does cling Peromyscus or both. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that it is a brutalization and it does cling Peromyscus does not hold. sent23: if the fact that the dallisgrass does not slacken and is not deductive is wrong then that it is dermatologic is right. sent24: the dayboy is not a apostasy if a arduousness untunes punctum. sent25: the charge does not untune elsholtzia if it is a kind of a brutalization and it uglifies. sent26: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-dermatologic thing that does untune punctum is incorrect the charge does not untune punctum. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent13 -> int1: the charge is a kind of a brutalization.; __UNKNOWN__