the fact that if that the Carver is not a kind of a scimitar hold the putty is not a organza and does bone lied is incorrect.
sent1: the crust is not a Chlamyphorus. sent2: that the putty is not a caravansary and mists does not hold if it is a organza. sent3: the tauon is not a caravansary. sent4: the Carver is a scimitar if the fact that the putty is not a kind of a caravansary and does mist does not hold. sent5: the fact that the crust is a kind of anacoluthic a timolol is not true if it is not a Chlamyphorus. sent6: something bones lied if it is ministerial. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is anacoluthic and it is a timolol is not true the putty is ministerial.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the putty is a kind of a organza.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the putty is not a caravansary but it is a mist is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Carver is a kind of a scimitar.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Carver is not a scimitar.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the putty is not a organza.; sent6 -> int5: the putty bones lied if it is ministerial.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the crust is anacoluthic and it is a kind of a timolol is not right.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is anacoluthic thing that is a timolol is not correct.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the putty is ministerial.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the putty does bone lied.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the putty is not a organza but it bones lied.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if that the Carver is not a kind of a scimitar hold the putty is not a organza and does bone lied is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the crust is not a Chlamyphorus. sent2: that the putty is not a caravansary and mists does not hold if it is a organza. sent3: the tauon is not a caravansary. sent4: the Carver is a scimitar if the fact that the putty is not a kind of a caravansary and does mist does not hold. sent5: the fact that the crust is a kind of anacoluthic a timolol is not true if it is not a Chlamyphorus. sent6: something bones lied if it is ministerial. sent7: if there exists something such that that it is anacoluthic and it is a timolol is not true the putty is ministerial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the putty is a kind of a organza.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the putty is not a caravansary but it is a mist is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Carver is a kind of a scimitar.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Carver is not a scimitar.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the putty is not a organza.; sent6 -> int5: the putty bones lied if it is ministerial.; sent5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the crust is anacoluthic and it is a kind of a timolol is not right.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is anacoluthic thing that is a timolol is not correct.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the putty is ministerial.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the putty does bone lied.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the putty is not a organza but it bones lied.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__