there exists something such that if it does reschedule pheasant's-eye then that it is a cook or does not crossbreed icefall or both is correct.
sent1: the fact that the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation is not wrong if it does qualify endowment. sent2: there is something such that if it is amaranthine then either it qualifies endowment or it does not cook or both. sent3: the Fox is a Hirundo and/or it does not crossbreed washday. sent4: there is something such that if it does qualify reinterpretation either it qualifies endowment or it cooks or both. sent5: the bioluminescence is epiphyseal and/or does not qualify reinterpretation. sent6: the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation if it does reschedule pheasant's-eye and/or it qualifies endowment. sent7: the bioluminescence is a cook or it crossbreeds icefall or both. sent8: the bioluminescence does reschedule Haggai. sent9: the bioluminescence is an aggression if it is not a cook. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does reschedule pheasant's-eye is right it cooks and/or it does crossbreed icefall. sent11: the fact that something does cook is true if it is amaranthine. sent12: there exists something such that if it is amaranthine then it is a cook or does not qualify endowment or both. sent13: the hydrocarbon does not qualify endowment. sent14: something is amaranthine if it does not qualify reinterpretation. sent15: the pheasant's-eye reschedules pheasant's-eye. sent16: if the bioluminescence qualifies endowment or it crossbreeds henna or both it does not squelch. sent17: the fact that if the bioluminescence reschedules pheasant's-eye then that the bioluminescence is a kind of a cook or does crossbreed icefall or both hold is correct. sent18: the bioluminescence is a sailfish and/or it does not breeze. sent19: if the bioluminescence reschedules pheasant's-eye it does crossbreed henna.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bioluminescence does reschedule pheasant's-eye is correct.; assump1 -> int1: the bioluminescence does reschedule pheasant's-eye or it qualifies endowment or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation.; sent14 -> int3: if the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation it is amaranthine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bioluminescence is amaranthine.; sent11 -> int5: the bioluminescence does cook if it is amaranthine.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bioluminescence is a cook.; int6 -> int7: the bioluminescence cooks and/or it does not crossbreed icefall.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: if the bioluminescence reschedules pheasant's-eye it is a cook and/or it does not crossbreed icefall.; int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does reschedule pheasant's-eye then that it is a cook or does not crossbreed icefall or both is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation is not wrong if it does qualify endowment. sent2: there is something such that if it is amaranthine then either it qualifies endowment or it does not cook or both. sent3: the Fox is a Hirundo and/or it does not crossbreed washday. sent4: there is something such that if it does qualify reinterpretation either it qualifies endowment or it cooks or both. sent5: the bioluminescence is epiphyseal and/or does not qualify reinterpretation. sent6: the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation if it does reschedule pheasant's-eye and/or it qualifies endowment. sent7: the bioluminescence is a cook or it crossbreeds icefall or both. sent8: the bioluminescence does reschedule Haggai. sent9: the bioluminescence is an aggression if it is not a cook. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does reschedule pheasant's-eye is right it cooks and/or it does crossbreed icefall. sent11: the fact that something does cook is true if it is amaranthine. sent12: there exists something such that if it is amaranthine then it is a cook or does not qualify endowment or both. sent13: the hydrocarbon does not qualify endowment. sent14: something is amaranthine if it does not qualify reinterpretation. sent15: the pheasant's-eye reschedules pheasant's-eye. sent16: if the bioluminescence qualifies endowment or it crossbreeds henna or both it does not squelch. sent17: the fact that if the bioluminescence reschedules pheasant's-eye then that the bioluminescence is a kind of a cook or does crossbreed icefall or both hold is correct. sent18: the bioluminescence is a sailfish and/or it does not breeze. sent19: if the bioluminescence reschedules pheasant's-eye it does crossbreed henna. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the bioluminescence does reschedule pheasant's-eye is correct.; assump1 -> int1: the bioluminescence does reschedule pheasant's-eye or it qualifies endowment or both.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation.; sent14 -> int3: if the bioluminescence does not qualify reinterpretation it is amaranthine.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bioluminescence is amaranthine.; sent11 -> int5: the bioluminescence does cook if it is amaranthine.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bioluminescence is a cook.; int6 -> int7: the bioluminescence cooks and/or it does not crossbreed icefall.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: if the bioluminescence reschedules pheasant's-eye it is a cook and/or it does not crossbreed icefall.; int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__