that there is something such that if it is psychoactive it is not a misdemeanor and it is not a kind of a inconspicuousness is incorrect.
sent1: an eleventh is both not a whisk and not a Enki. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not non-biotitic it is not a Dicranum. sent3: if the treenail is psychoactive then it does not familiarize and it interleaves Fentanyl. sent4: the jackrabbit is both not a misdemeanor and a inconspicuousness if it is psychoactive. sent5: there exists something such that if it is unseasonable it is not biotitic. sent6: if the cliff demilitarizes nook it is not multiphase and does not contradistinguish treenail. sent7: the fact that there is something such that if it does chauffeur then it is not a Dipus is correct. sent8: that if the jackrabbit is striate the jackrabbit is not a misdemeanor and it is not a kind of a malacologist is correct. sent9: something is not a fourteenth and it is not a dot-com if it is a arianist. sent10: the fact that the jackrabbit does not contradistinguish penciled and it is not a Brigit hold if it is psychoactive. sent11: there is something such that if it is psychoactive then it is a misdemeanor and not a inconspicuousness. sent12: something is not a kind of a misdemeanor and is not a inconspicuousness if it is psychoactive. sent13: something that does fret pistillode is both not a snips and not parturient. sent14: the biologist is not a Terebellidae and not unpropitious if the fact that it does demilitarize penciled is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is psychoactive is not wrong then that it is not a misdemeanor is not incorrect.
sent12 -> int1: if the jackrabbit is psychoactive then it is not a misdemeanor and is not a kind of a inconspicuousness.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is psychoactive it is not a misdemeanor and it is not a kind of a inconspicuousness is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: an eleventh is both not a whisk and not a Enki. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not non-biotitic it is not a Dicranum. sent3: if the treenail is psychoactive then it does not familiarize and it interleaves Fentanyl. sent4: the jackrabbit is both not a misdemeanor and a inconspicuousness if it is psychoactive. sent5: there exists something such that if it is unseasonable it is not biotitic. sent6: if the cliff demilitarizes nook it is not multiphase and does not contradistinguish treenail. sent7: the fact that there is something such that if it does chauffeur then it is not a Dipus is correct. sent8: that if the jackrabbit is striate the jackrabbit is not a misdemeanor and it is not a kind of a malacologist is correct. sent9: something is not a fourteenth and it is not a dot-com if it is a arianist. sent10: the fact that the jackrabbit does not contradistinguish penciled and it is not a Brigit hold if it is psychoactive. sent11: there is something such that if it is psychoactive then it is a misdemeanor and not a inconspicuousness. sent12: something is not a kind of a misdemeanor and is not a inconspicuousness if it is psychoactive. sent13: something that does fret pistillode is both not a snips and not parturient. sent14: the biologist is not a Terebellidae and not unpropitious if the fact that it does demilitarize penciled is not wrong. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is psychoactive is not wrong then that it is not a misdemeanor is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the jackrabbit is psychoactive then it is not a misdemeanor and is not a kind of a inconspicuousness.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__