the fact that the conjunctivalness does not occur is not incorrect if the fatwa happens.
sent1: the cryogenicness does not occur. sent2: that the conjunctivalness occurs is prevented by that the fatwa occurs and/or that the inserting sunlight happens. sent3: the inserting exabit does not occur if the cacodemonicness occurs and/or the disestablishment happens. sent4: either the lasting euphoriant happens or the hypoglycemicness occurs or both. sent5: if the pulsation happens then the lasting fadeout does not occur. sent6: the theologizing or the dentalness or both occurs. sent7: the conjunctivalness occurs if the fatwa occurs. sent8: the input occurs. sent9: if the match-up does not occur then either the booking happens or the conjunctivalness occurs or both. sent10: that the karate does not occur is right if the hyping bohemianism and/or the agnosticness occurs. sent11: if the inserting sunlight happens then the conjunctivalness does not occur. sent12: if the lasting euphoriant does not occur then the fact that both the non-autogamousness and the bay happens is false. sent13: the Spartanness and/or the chronologicalness occurs. sent14: that the phoneticness does not occur is correct. sent15: the tragicness occurs and/or the throbbing occurs. sent16: if the enlistment occurs then the chronologicalness does not occur. sent17: the non-conjunctivalness is prevented by that the fatwa or the inserting sunlight or both occurs. sent18: the match-up does not occur if the fact that both the non-autogamousness and the bay occurs does not hold. sent19: the conjunctivalness happens. sent20: if the fact that the lasting enrollee occurs hold then the subscriptness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fatwa happens is not incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: either the fatwa or the inserting sunlight or both occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the conjunctivalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the decorousness occurs and/or the wideness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the conjunctivalness does not occur is not incorrect if the fatwa happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the cryogenicness does not occur. sent2: that the conjunctivalness occurs is prevented by that the fatwa occurs and/or that the inserting sunlight happens. sent3: the inserting exabit does not occur if the cacodemonicness occurs and/or the disestablishment happens. sent4: either the lasting euphoriant happens or the hypoglycemicness occurs or both. sent5: if the pulsation happens then the lasting fadeout does not occur. sent6: the theologizing or the dentalness or both occurs. sent7: the conjunctivalness occurs if the fatwa occurs. sent8: the input occurs. sent9: if the match-up does not occur then either the booking happens or the conjunctivalness occurs or both. sent10: that the karate does not occur is right if the hyping bohemianism and/or the agnosticness occurs. sent11: if the inserting sunlight happens then the conjunctivalness does not occur. sent12: if the lasting euphoriant does not occur then the fact that both the non-autogamousness and the bay happens is false. sent13: the Spartanness and/or the chronologicalness occurs. sent14: that the phoneticness does not occur is correct. sent15: the tragicness occurs and/or the throbbing occurs. sent16: if the enlistment occurs then the chronologicalness does not occur. sent17: the non-conjunctivalness is prevented by that the fatwa or the inserting sunlight or both occurs. sent18: the match-up does not occur if the fact that both the non-autogamousness and the bay occurs does not hold. sent19: the conjunctivalness happens. sent20: if the fact that the lasting enrollee occurs hold then the subscriptness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fatwa happens is not incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: either the fatwa or the inserting sunlight or both occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the conjunctivalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__