the fact that the archivist either does post Brno or is a Townsendia or both is wrong.
sent1: the interviewee is insurrectional if that the work-shirt is not a kind of a mazer but it is a lullaby is not correct. sent2: the interviewee does frighten self-expression. sent3: something does frighten self-expression if that it does not frighten self-expression and is not phallic is false. sent4: the work-shirt is a lullaby. sent5: if something that does not post Brno is non-insurrectional then the interviewee is a mazer. sent6: if the work-shirt is not a lullaby then the interviewee is not non-insurrectional. sent7: if something is not centripetal then that the archivist does not frighten self-expression and is not phallic is wrong. sent8: if the roan is not a chlorothiazide and/or it expects it is not centripetal. sent9: if the work-shirt is not a kind of a lullaby and is insurrectional then the interviewee is a mazer. sent10: if the fact that the roan expects is right then it is a kind of non-centripetal thing that is a chlorothiazide. sent11: if something is a Townsendia then the work-shirt does not post Brno and is non-insurrectional. sent12: the interviewee does frighten self-expression and is not phallic. sent13: the interviewee does post Brno if the fact that the archivist is not a Townsendia and is phallic does not hold. sent14: the work-shirt frightens self-expression if the interviewee does frightens self-expression. sent15: the interviewee does frighten self-expression and is phallic if the roan is not centripetal. sent16: the interviewee is not insurrectional if that it does frighten self-expression and is not phallic hold. sent17: if that the work-shirt is insurrectional hold that the archivist is not insurrectional is not incorrect. sent18: the archivist does post Brno if the work-shirt is not a mazer but it is a lullaby. sent19: that either something does post Brno or it is a Townsendia or both is not correct if it is not insurrectional.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the work-shirt is not a mazer but it is a kind of a lullaby does not hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the interviewee is insurrectional.; sent16 & sent12 -> int2: the interviewee is not insurrectional.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the work-shirt is not a mazer and is a lullaby.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the archivist does post Brno.; int5 -> hypothesis;
that the archivist does post Brno and/or it is a Townsendia is not right.
sent19 -> int6: that the archivist posts Brno or is a Townsendia or both is not right if it is not insurrectional.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the archivist either does post Brno or is a Townsendia or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the interviewee is insurrectional if that the work-shirt is not a kind of a mazer but it is a lullaby is not correct. sent2: the interviewee does frighten self-expression. sent3: something does frighten self-expression if that it does not frighten self-expression and is not phallic is false. sent4: the work-shirt is a lullaby. sent5: if something that does not post Brno is non-insurrectional then the interviewee is a mazer. sent6: if the work-shirt is not a lullaby then the interviewee is not non-insurrectional. sent7: if something is not centripetal then that the archivist does not frighten self-expression and is not phallic is wrong. sent8: if the roan is not a chlorothiazide and/or it expects it is not centripetal. sent9: if the work-shirt is not a kind of a lullaby and is insurrectional then the interviewee is a mazer. sent10: if the fact that the roan expects is right then it is a kind of non-centripetal thing that is a chlorothiazide. sent11: if something is a Townsendia then the work-shirt does not post Brno and is non-insurrectional. sent12: the interviewee does frighten self-expression and is not phallic. sent13: the interviewee does post Brno if the fact that the archivist is not a Townsendia and is phallic does not hold. sent14: the work-shirt frightens self-expression if the interviewee does frightens self-expression. sent15: the interviewee does frighten self-expression and is phallic if the roan is not centripetal. sent16: the interviewee is not insurrectional if that it does frighten self-expression and is not phallic hold. sent17: if that the work-shirt is insurrectional hold that the archivist is not insurrectional is not incorrect. sent18: the archivist does post Brno if the work-shirt is not a mazer but it is a lullaby. sent19: that either something does post Brno or it is a Townsendia or both is not correct if it is not insurrectional. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the work-shirt is not a mazer but it is a kind of a lullaby does not hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the interviewee is insurrectional.; sent16 & sent12 -> int2: the interviewee is not insurrectional.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the work-shirt is not a mazer and is a lullaby.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the archivist does post Brno.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__