the LASIK does not occur.
sent1: if the avionicness does not occur that the chordalness occurs and the studding Packera does not occur is not correct. sent2: that the tuning does not occur and/or the exhibiting occurs yields that the tannicness happens. sent3: if the chordalness happens then that the non-catabolicness and the non-avionicness happens is incorrect. sent4: if the by-election occurs the non-coitalness or the neglecting Ummah or both happens. sent5: the fact that the coitalness does not occur and the neglecting Ummah does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the LASIK does not occur if the nesting narcotic and the conglomeration occurs. sent7: both the conglomeration and the by-election occurs. sent8: that the studding Packera but not the nesting narcotic happens does not hold if the conglomeration does not occur. sent9: the catabolicness occurs but the unidirectionalness does not occur if the neglecting Ummah does not occur. sent10: the nesting narcotic occurs if the fact that the chordalness but not the studding Packera happens is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the tuning does not occur or the exhibiting happens or both is not correct the avionicness does not occur. sent12: the chordalness occurs if that the studding Packera occurs and the nesting narcotic does not occur is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the tuning does not occur or the exhibiting occurs or both.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the tannicness occurs hold.; sent5 -> int2: the neglecting Ummah does not occur.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: both the catabolicness and the non-unidirectionalness happens.; sent7 -> int4: the conglomeration occurs.;
the LASIK occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the LASIK does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the avionicness does not occur that the chordalness occurs and the studding Packera does not occur is not correct. sent2: that the tuning does not occur and/or the exhibiting occurs yields that the tannicness happens. sent3: if the chordalness happens then that the non-catabolicness and the non-avionicness happens is incorrect. sent4: if the by-election occurs the non-coitalness or the neglecting Ummah or both happens. sent5: the fact that the coitalness does not occur and the neglecting Ummah does not occur is not wrong. sent6: the LASIK does not occur if the nesting narcotic and the conglomeration occurs. sent7: both the conglomeration and the by-election occurs. sent8: that the studding Packera but not the nesting narcotic happens does not hold if the conglomeration does not occur. sent9: the catabolicness occurs but the unidirectionalness does not occur if the neglecting Ummah does not occur. sent10: the nesting narcotic occurs if the fact that the chordalness but not the studding Packera happens is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the tuning does not occur or the exhibiting happens or both is not correct the avionicness does not occur. sent12: the chordalness occurs if that the studding Packera occurs and the nesting narcotic does not occur is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the tuning does not occur or the exhibiting occurs or both.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the tannicness occurs hold.; sent5 -> int2: the neglecting Ummah does not occur.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: both the catabolicness and the non-unidirectionalness happens.; sent7 -> int4: the conglomeration occurs.; __UNKNOWN__