both the non-anagogicness and the non-ceremoniousness occurs.
sent1: the nonhumanness happens. sent2: that the terming masking does not occur prevents the ceremoniousness. sent3: the storming does not occur. sent4: the habitation happens and the hymning rhizoid occurs if the storm does not occur. sent5: if the nonhumanness happens and the terming masking occurs then the habitation does not occur. sent6: that the non-anagogicness and the non-ceremoniousness occurs does not hold if the fact that the nonhumanness does not occur is right. sent7: that the terming masking does not occur leads to that both the non-anagogicness and the non-ceremoniousness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the terming masking occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the nonhumanness and the terming masking occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the habitation does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the habitation occurs and the hymning rhizoid occurs.; int3 -> int4: the habitation occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the terming masking does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the non-anagogicness and the non-ceremoniousness occurs is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = both the non-anagogicness and the non-ceremoniousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the nonhumanness happens. sent2: that the terming masking does not occur prevents the ceremoniousness. sent3: the storming does not occur. sent4: the habitation happens and the hymning rhizoid occurs if the storm does not occur. sent5: if the nonhumanness happens and the terming masking occurs then the habitation does not occur. sent6: that the non-anagogicness and the non-ceremoniousness occurs does not hold if the fact that the nonhumanness does not occur is right. sent7: that the terming masking does not occur leads to that both the non-anagogicness and the non-ceremoniousness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the terming masking occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the nonhumanness and the terming masking occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the habitation does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the habitation occurs and the hymning rhizoid occurs.; int3 -> int4: the habitation occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the terming masking does not occur.; int6 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__