the fact that the fact that there exists something such that if either it is a goldenrod or it is not undulatory or both it is non-Benedictine is not incorrect is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it does not deduce Horneophyton it is not a overachievement. sent2: if the fug is a kind of a Benedictine it does not sweeten. sent3: if something is a backgrounder or it is not pneumogastric or both then it is not a kind of a goldenrod. sent4: there is something such that if it is a goldenrod it is not a Benedictine. sent5: the fug is not Benedictine if either it is a goldenrod or it is not undulatory or both. sent6: there exists something such that if it is an oscillation it does not allude. sent7: there exists something such that if it either is a kind of a Dnieper or is not motivational or both it does not skim Cocculus. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a surfacing is not false then it is not solanaceous. sent9: there is something such that if that it is Anglo-catholic hold then it is not impalpable. sent10: there exists something such that if it is either Chippendale or a Sekhet or both it does not skim quarter. sent11: if the standard-bearer is isomorphous and/or it is not a laryngoscope it unbars oroide. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a phosgene or it does deduce molester or both then it does not impart. sent13: there is something such that if it is tetragonal or it does deduce Horneophyton or both it is not an emergence. sent14: the fug is not Benedictine if it is a kind of a goldenrod.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
the iceboat is not a goldenrod if either it is a backgrounder or it is not pneumogastric or both.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that there exists something such that if either it is a goldenrod or it is not undulatory or both it is non-Benedictine is not incorrect is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does not deduce Horneophyton it is not a overachievement. sent2: if the fug is a kind of a Benedictine it does not sweeten. sent3: if something is a backgrounder or it is not pneumogastric or both then it is not a kind of a goldenrod. sent4: there is something such that if it is a goldenrod it is not a Benedictine. sent5: the fug is not Benedictine if either it is a goldenrod or it is not undulatory or both. sent6: there exists something such that if it is an oscillation it does not allude. sent7: there exists something such that if it either is a kind of a Dnieper or is not motivational or both it does not skim Cocculus. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a surfacing is not false then it is not solanaceous. sent9: there is something such that if that it is Anglo-catholic hold then it is not impalpable. sent10: there exists something such that if it is either Chippendale or a Sekhet or both it does not skim quarter. sent11: if the standard-bearer is isomorphous and/or it is not a laryngoscope it unbars oroide. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a phosgene or it does deduce molester or both then it does not impart. sent13: there is something such that if it is tetragonal or it does deduce Horneophyton or both it is not an emergence. sent14: the fug is not Benedictine if it is a kind of a goldenrod. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__