not the slap but the Unitarianness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the conclusion does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the Unitarian happens. sent3: that that the slap does not occur but the Unitarianness happens brings about that the reissuing fraudulence happens hold. sent4: the fact that the consternating papier-mache does not occur but the disclosure occurs is false. sent5: the reissuing fraudulence does not occur. sent6: the hornpipe happens. sent7: the unusualness occurs. sent8: not the snowballing rushlight but the inflectionalness occurs. sent9: the dialecticsness does not occur but the inflaming occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the slapping but the Unitarian occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the reissuing fraudulence occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = not the slap but the Unitarianness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the conclusion does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the Unitarian happens. sent3: that that the slap does not occur but the Unitarianness happens brings about that the reissuing fraudulence happens hold. sent4: the fact that the consternating papier-mache does not occur but the disclosure occurs is false. sent5: the reissuing fraudulence does not occur. sent6: the hornpipe happens. sent7: the unusualness occurs. sent8: not the snowballing rushlight but the inflectionalness occurs. sent9: the dialecticsness does not occur but the inflaming occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the slapping but the Unitarian occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the reissuing fraudulence occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__