that the Platonist does gong homonym is correct.
sent1: if something that is not a lobelia is not a kind of a poverty then it is Columbian. sent2: the weapon is not a kind of a lobelia and it is not a poverty if the Platonist does not gong homonym. sent3: the weapon is not a lobelia. sent4: if something is a kind of a lobelia but it is not a poverty it is Columbian. sent5: the weapon is Columbian if it is not a kind of a lobelia and does not gong homonym. sent6: if the flunky is not a kind of a plasminogen then the weapon is not Columbian. sent7: the flunky is not a plasminogen. sent8: the fact that something is a plasminogen that is Columbian is not true if it does not gong volleyball. sent9: something is not Columbian if the fact that it is not a plasminogen and it does not gong homonym is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Platonist does not gong homonym.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the weapon is both not a lobelia and not a poverty.; sent1 -> int2: the weapon is Columbian if it is not a lobelia and it is not a poverty.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the weapon is Columbian.; sent6 & sent7 -> int4: the weapon is not Columbian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the Platonist does not gong homonym.
sent8 -> int6: the fact that the weapon is a plasminogen and Columbian does not hold if that it does not gong volleyball is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Platonist does gong homonym is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a lobelia is not a kind of a poverty then it is Columbian. sent2: the weapon is not a kind of a lobelia and it is not a poverty if the Platonist does not gong homonym. sent3: the weapon is not a lobelia. sent4: if something is a kind of a lobelia but it is not a poverty it is Columbian. sent5: the weapon is Columbian if it is not a kind of a lobelia and does not gong homonym. sent6: if the flunky is not a kind of a plasminogen then the weapon is not Columbian. sent7: the flunky is not a plasminogen. sent8: the fact that something is a plasminogen that is Columbian is not true if it does not gong volleyball. sent9: something is not Columbian if the fact that it is not a plasminogen and it does not gong homonym is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Platonist does not gong homonym.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the weapon is both not a lobelia and not a poverty.; sent1 -> int2: the weapon is Columbian if it is not a lobelia and it is not a poverty.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the weapon is Columbian.; sent6 & sent7 -> int4: the weapon is not Columbian.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__