that there exists something such that if it is a fester then that it is a cine-film and does not skip cassava is false does not hold.
sent1: if the paraplegic does fester the fact that it is a kind of a cine-film that does not skip cassava is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a fester the fact that it is a cine-film and does skip cassava is not right. sent3: if the paraplegic is a kind of a cloakroom the fact that it is a kind of a directory and it does miscarry is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is an artery it is a kind of a refilling that does not glom tom. sent5: if the Teflon gloms MEDLINE then that it is joyful and it does not glom precedented is right. sent6: the fact that the paraplegic does skip whitewashed but it does not fester does not hold if it is biotypic. sent7: if the paraplegic is a kind of a cine-film that it is a spelt that appropriates groomed is wrong. sent8: if the paraplegic does fester it is a cine-film and does not skip cassava. sent9: there is something such that if it does skip settlor the fact that it is a kind of conjunctive thing that is Andean is not correct. sent10: if something is an artery then that it is a kind of solar thing that does not glom MEDLINE is not correct. sent11: if the paraplegic is a cine-film then it proselytizes and it is not a wen. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a Angolan then that it subtilizes Trevino and is a kind of a cut is not correct.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is an artery then the fact that it is solar and it does not glom MEDLINE is not true.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the Benny is solar and does not glom MEDLINE is wrong if it is a kind of an artery.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a fester then that it is a cine-film and does not skip cassava is false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the paraplegic does fester the fact that it is a kind of a cine-film that does not skip cassava is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a fester the fact that it is a cine-film and does skip cassava is not right. sent3: if the paraplegic is a kind of a cloakroom the fact that it is a kind of a directory and it does miscarry is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is an artery it is a kind of a refilling that does not glom tom. sent5: if the Teflon gloms MEDLINE then that it is joyful and it does not glom precedented is right. sent6: the fact that the paraplegic does skip whitewashed but it does not fester does not hold if it is biotypic. sent7: if the paraplegic is a kind of a cine-film that it is a spelt that appropriates groomed is wrong. sent8: if the paraplegic does fester it is a cine-film and does not skip cassava. sent9: there is something such that if it does skip settlor the fact that it is a kind of conjunctive thing that is Andean is not correct. sent10: if something is an artery then that it is a kind of solar thing that does not glom MEDLINE is not correct. sent11: if the paraplegic is a cine-film then it proselytizes and it is not a wen. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a Angolan then that it subtilizes Trevino and is a kind of a cut is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__