the funerariness does not occur but the tease happens if the proprioceptiveness occurs.
sent1: the fudging happens. sent2: the shunning livedo occurs. sent3: the fact that the passerine occurs is not wrong. sent4: the dominance does not occur. sent5: the impelling reedbird does not occur if both the indulgence and the controversy happens. sent6: the overreaching sugarcane happens. sent7: the fact that the military happens is not false. sent8: the traceableness does not occur. sent9: the inhabiting is prevented by that not the impelling reedbird but the plausibleness happens. sent10: the overreaching prestidigitation happens. sent11: that the nonstop does not occur and the proprioceptiveness happens triggers the non-funeraryness. sent12: the encouragement does not occur. sent13: both the tease and the military happens. sent14: the shunning bench occurs. sent15: the receptiveness does not occur. sent16: that the bastinadoing tomalley does not occur hold if the electrification happens and the vinaceousness happens. sent17: that the shunning dysentery does not occur is correct if the nonstop and the overreaching sugarcane occurs. sent18: the overreaching gripe happens and the fellating occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonstop occurs.; assump2 & sent6 -> int1: the nonstop occurs and the overreaching sugarcane occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the shunning dysentery does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proprioceptiveness happens.; sent13 -> int3: the teasing happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the funerariness does not occur but the tease happens if the proprioceptiveness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fudging happens. sent2: the shunning livedo occurs. sent3: the fact that the passerine occurs is not wrong. sent4: the dominance does not occur. sent5: the impelling reedbird does not occur if both the indulgence and the controversy happens. sent6: the overreaching sugarcane happens. sent7: the fact that the military happens is not false. sent8: the traceableness does not occur. sent9: the inhabiting is prevented by that not the impelling reedbird but the plausibleness happens. sent10: the overreaching prestidigitation happens. sent11: that the nonstop does not occur and the proprioceptiveness happens triggers the non-funeraryness. sent12: the encouragement does not occur. sent13: both the tease and the military happens. sent14: the shunning bench occurs. sent15: the receptiveness does not occur. sent16: that the bastinadoing tomalley does not occur hold if the electrification happens and the vinaceousness happens. sent17: that the shunning dysentery does not occur is correct if the nonstop and the overreaching sugarcane occurs. sent18: the overreaching gripe happens and the fellating occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonstop occurs.; assump2 & sent6 -> int1: the nonstop occurs and the overreaching sugarcane occurs.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the shunning dysentery does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proprioceptiveness happens.; sent13 -> int3: the teasing happens.; __UNKNOWN__