the crying does not occur.
sent1: if the westerly does not occur that the flinging but not the Death happens is false. sent2: if the deployment does not occur the fling does not occur. sent3: the westerly occurs if the containment occurs. sent4: the containment happens. sent5: that the dealings occurs but the monitoring does not occur does not hold. sent6: if not the flinging but the westerly occurs then the crying does not occur. sent7: that if the fact that the dealings but not the monitoring happens is incorrect then the Death does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the count occurs if the deployment happens. sent9: the fact that the deployment happens but the crying does not occur does not hold if the counting does not occur. sent10: the neuteringness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deployment happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the count happens.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: the Death does not occur.; sent3 & sent4 -> int3: the westerly occurs.;
the crying occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the crying does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the westerly does not occur that the flinging but not the Death happens is false. sent2: if the deployment does not occur the fling does not occur. sent3: the westerly occurs if the containment occurs. sent4: the containment happens. sent5: that the dealings occurs but the monitoring does not occur does not hold. sent6: if not the flinging but the westerly occurs then the crying does not occur. sent7: that if the fact that the dealings but not the monitoring happens is incorrect then the Death does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the count occurs if the deployment happens. sent9: the fact that the deployment happens but the crying does not occur does not hold if the counting does not occur. sent10: the neuteringness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deployment happens.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the count happens.; sent7 & sent5 -> int2: the Death does not occur.; sent3 & sent4 -> int3: the westerly occurs.; __UNKNOWN__