the pellet is tangential.
sent1: the fact that that the pellet is not a intransitive and perpetuates thalamus is not right hold if the perinatologist perpetuates thalamus. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not perpetuate thalamus and is not a Burnett is false the perinatologist is tangential. sent3: if that something is not a intransitive and does perpetuate thalamus is not right it is tangential. sent4: the fact that the fact that the pellet is not macroeconomic but it is tangential is false is not wrong if the thalamus is tangential. sent5: if there is something such that it does team then the advocate is a kind of a monolingual. sent6: the fact that the pellet does not team and is not a kind of a Burnett does not hold if that the winery does not perpetuate thalamus is not incorrect. sent7: if the perinatologist is a cyan the pellet is a monolingual and/or does not perpetuate thalamus. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it teams and it is not a Burnett is incorrect. sent9: if the perinatologist does not perpetuate thalamus the fact that the winery is not a team and is not a kind of a Burnett does not hold. sent10: the advocate is monolingual if there is something such that that it is not a team and it is not a Burnett does not hold. sent11: that the winery is a team but not a Burnett is not correct. sent12: if the advocate is a monolingual then the thalamus is a cyan. sent13: the thalamus is not a kind of a cyan but it is macroeconomic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perinatologist does not perpetuate thalamus.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the winery is not a team and is not a Burnett is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a team and not a Burnett is not true.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the advocate is not non-monolingual is not false.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the thalamus is a cyan.; sent13 -> int5: the thalamus is not a cyan.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the perinatologist does perpetuate thalamus.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: that the fact that the pellet is a kind of transitive thing that does perpetuate thalamus is wrong is correct.; sent3 -> int9: the pellet is tangential if that it is not intransitive and it does perpetuate thalamus does not hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the pellet is not tangential is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the pellet is tangential. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the pellet is not a intransitive and perpetuates thalamus is not right hold if the perinatologist perpetuates thalamus. sent2: if there exists something such that that it does not perpetuate thalamus and is not a Burnett is false the perinatologist is tangential. sent3: if that something is not a intransitive and does perpetuate thalamus is not right it is tangential. sent4: the fact that the fact that the pellet is not macroeconomic but it is tangential is false is not wrong if the thalamus is tangential. sent5: if there is something such that it does team then the advocate is a kind of a monolingual. sent6: the fact that the pellet does not team and is not a kind of a Burnett does not hold if that the winery does not perpetuate thalamus is not incorrect. sent7: if the perinatologist is a cyan the pellet is a monolingual and/or does not perpetuate thalamus. sent8: there exists something such that the fact that it teams and it is not a Burnett is incorrect. sent9: if the perinatologist does not perpetuate thalamus the fact that the winery is not a team and is not a kind of a Burnett does not hold. sent10: the advocate is monolingual if there is something such that that it is not a team and it is not a Burnett does not hold. sent11: that the winery is a team but not a Burnett is not correct. sent12: if the advocate is a monolingual then the thalamus is a cyan. sent13: the thalamus is not a kind of a cyan but it is macroeconomic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the perinatologist does not perpetuate thalamus.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the winery is not a team and is not a Burnett is wrong.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a team and not a Burnett is not true.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the advocate is not non-monolingual is not false.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the thalamus is a cyan.; sent13 -> int5: the thalamus is not a cyan.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the perinatologist does perpetuate thalamus.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: that the fact that the pellet is a kind of transitive thing that does perpetuate thalamus is wrong is correct.; sent3 -> int9: the pellet is tangential if that it is not intransitive and it does perpetuate thalamus does not hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__