that the shipowner is a Zalophus if the pterodactyl is a prophecy is false.
sent1: that the pterodactyl is diagonalizable and rustles orangewood is incorrect if it is a prophecy. sent2: the pignut does not rustle fifteenth if the fact that the pterodactyl is a kind of diagonalizable thing that does not rustle orangewood is not right. sent3: if the pterodactyl is a prophecy then the fact that it is diagonalizable and does not rustle orangewood is false. sent4: if the pterodactyl does rustle orangewood the pignut does not rustle fifteenth. sent5: the fact that the pterodactyl is a kind of diagonalizable thing that does rustle orangewood is wrong. sent6: the pterodactyl is not diagonalizable but it is a kind of a Zalophus if the fact that the shipowner is not diagonalizable is right. sent7: that the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth hold. sent8: the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth but it does habit barmbrack if the pignut does not rustle fifteenth. sent9: the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth if the pignut does not rustle fifteenth. sent10: something is a kind of a Zalophus if it habits barmbrack.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pterodactyl is a prophecy.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pterodactyl is diagonalizable but it does not rustle orangewood does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the pignut does not rustle fifteenth.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth but it does habit barmbrack.; int3 -> int4: the shipowner habits barmbrack.; sent10 -> int5: the shipowner is a kind of a Zalophus if it habits barmbrack.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the shipowner is a kind of a Zalophus.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the shipowner is a Zalophus if the pterodactyl is a prophecy is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the pterodactyl is diagonalizable and rustles orangewood is incorrect if it is a prophecy. sent2: the pignut does not rustle fifteenth if the fact that the pterodactyl is a kind of diagonalizable thing that does not rustle orangewood is not right. sent3: if the pterodactyl is a prophecy then the fact that it is diagonalizable and does not rustle orangewood is false. sent4: if the pterodactyl does rustle orangewood the pignut does not rustle fifteenth. sent5: the fact that the pterodactyl is a kind of diagonalizable thing that does rustle orangewood is wrong. sent6: the pterodactyl is not diagonalizable but it is a kind of a Zalophus if the fact that the shipowner is not diagonalizable is right. sent7: that the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth hold. sent8: the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth but it does habit barmbrack if the pignut does not rustle fifteenth. sent9: the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth if the pignut does not rustle fifteenth. sent10: something is a kind of a Zalophus if it habits barmbrack. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pterodactyl is a prophecy.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the pterodactyl is diagonalizable but it does not rustle orangewood does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the pignut does not rustle fifteenth.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the shipowner does not rustle fifteenth but it does habit barmbrack.; int3 -> int4: the shipowner habits barmbrack.; sent10 -> int5: the shipowner is a kind of a Zalophus if it habits barmbrack.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the shipowner is a kind of a Zalophus.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__