the rookery briefs baud.
sent1: if the inula is not protozoal it is not scalable and it does incorporate ethane. sent2: if the fact that the inula is an inflammation and not parliamentary does not hold then it is not protozoal. sent3: if something that is not scalable does incorporate ethane the fact that the groundberry is implacable is true. sent4: the inula is vocalic if the groundberry is a kind of parliamentary thing that is not implacable. sent5: if the fact that the flamboyant does not tinsel Eisenhower hold the demand is a kind of a neurinoma but it does not tinsel Eisenhower. sent6: that the rookery does brief baud is false if the flamboyant is not dysphemistic and it is not vocalic. sent7: the flamboyant is a kind of dysphemistic thing that is vocalic. sent8: the flamboyant is not Romance if that the groundberry is not implacable or it is a kind of a Romance or both is incorrect. sent9: if the demand is a kind of a neurinoma but it does not tinsel Eisenhower the rookery briefs baud. sent10: something is not non-Romance if it is dysphemistic. sent11: the groundberry is not implacable if there exists something such that it is a kind of Romance thing that tinsels Eisenhower.
sent7 -> int1: the flamboyant is dysphemistic.; sent10 -> int2: if the flamboyant is dysphemistic the fact that it is a Romance is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flamboyant is a kind of a Romance.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flamboyant does tinsel Eisenhower.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the flamboyant is Romance and it tinsels Eisenhower.; int4 -> int5: something is a Romance and it does tinsel Eisenhower.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the groundberry is not implacable.;
the rookery does not brief baud.
$hypothesis$ = the rookery briefs baud. ; $context$ = sent1: if the inula is not protozoal it is not scalable and it does incorporate ethane. sent2: if the fact that the inula is an inflammation and not parliamentary does not hold then it is not protozoal. sent3: if something that is not scalable does incorporate ethane the fact that the groundberry is implacable is true. sent4: the inula is vocalic if the groundberry is a kind of parliamentary thing that is not implacable. sent5: if the fact that the flamboyant does not tinsel Eisenhower hold the demand is a kind of a neurinoma but it does not tinsel Eisenhower. sent6: that the rookery does brief baud is false if the flamboyant is not dysphemistic and it is not vocalic. sent7: the flamboyant is a kind of dysphemistic thing that is vocalic. sent8: the flamboyant is not Romance if that the groundberry is not implacable or it is a kind of a Romance or both is incorrect. sent9: if the demand is a kind of a neurinoma but it does not tinsel Eisenhower the rookery briefs baud. sent10: something is not non-Romance if it is dysphemistic. sent11: the groundberry is not implacable if there exists something such that it is a kind of Romance thing that tinsels Eisenhower. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the flamboyant is dysphemistic.; sent10 -> int2: if the flamboyant is dysphemistic the fact that it is a Romance is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flamboyant is a kind of a Romance.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flamboyant does tinsel Eisenhower.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the flamboyant is Romance and it tinsels Eisenhower.; int4 -> int5: something is a Romance and it does tinsel Eisenhower.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the groundberry is not implacable.; __UNKNOWN__