that the traitor is non-technological is true.
sent1: something bestows and it is a Romance if it is not heterodactyl. sent2: the traitor is not a lama and it is not heterodactyl. sent3: if something is unresponsive then it is technological. sent4: the boysenberry is not a Romance if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a lama and it is a Romance is wrong. sent5: if something is not heterodactyl then it is a Romance. sent6: if the GB is not unresponsive then the boysenberry is Caesarian and is not a kind of a territorialization. sent7: if the lender is heterodactyl then the battlefront is heterodactyl. sent8: the fact that the battlefront is not a lama but it is Romance is incorrect if it is heterodactyl. sent9: the traitor is a Romance. sent10: if the boysenberry is Caesarian but it is not a territorialization the traitor is a kind of a Badaga. sent11: if the GB is a Badaga and it is unresponsive then the boysenberry is not unresponsive. sent12: the boysenberry is not a territorialization. sent13: the GB is not unresponsive. sent14: the traitor is a Badaga if the boysenberry is Caesarian thing that is a territorialization. sent15: if something is technological and it is a kind of a Badaga then it does not bestow. sent16: the lender is heterodactyl. sent17: if the boysenberry is a territorialization but not technological then the traitor is Caesarian. sent18: the GB does not bestow.
sent6 & sent13 -> int1: the boysenberry is both Caesarian and not a territorialization.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the traitor is a kind of a Badaga.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the traitor is technological.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the traitor is technological and a Badaga.; sent15 -> int4: the traitor does not bestow if it is technological thing that is a Badaga.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the traitor does not bestow.; sent1 -> int6: the traitor does bestow and is Romance if it is not heterodactyl.; sent2 -> int7: the traitor is not heterodactyl.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the traitor does bestow and is a kind of a Romance.; int8 -> int9: the traitor does bestow.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the boysenberry is not unresponsive.
$hypothesis$ = that the traitor is non-technological is true. ; $context$ = sent1: something bestows and it is a Romance if it is not heterodactyl. sent2: the traitor is not a lama and it is not heterodactyl. sent3: if something is unresponsive then it is technological. sent4: the boysenberry is not a Romance if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a lama and it is a Romance is wrong. sent5: if something is not heterodactyl then it is a Romance. sent6: if the GB is not unresponsive then the boysenberry is Caesarian and is not a kind of a territorialization. sent7: if the lender is heterodactyl then the battlefront is heterodactyl. sent8: the fact that the battlefront is not a lama but it is Romance is incorrect if it is heterodactyl. sent9: the traitor is a Romance. sent10: if the boysenberry is Caesarian but it is not a territorialization the traitor is a kind of a Badaga. sent11: if the GB is a Badaga and it is unresponsive then the boysenberry is not unresponsive. sent12: the boysenberry is not a territorialization. sent13: the GB is not unresponsive. sent14: the traitor is a Badaga if the boysenberry is Caesarian thing that is a territorialization. sent15: if something is technological and it is a kind of a Badaga then it does not bestow. sent16: the lender is heterodactyl. sent17: if the boysenberry is a territorialization but not technological then the traitor is Caesarian. sent18: the GB does not bestow. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent13 -> int1: the boysenberry is both Caesarian and not a territorialization.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the traitor is a kind of a Badaga.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the traitor is technological.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the traitor is technological and a Badaga.; sent15 -> int4: the traitor does not bestow if it is technological thing that is a Badaga.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the traitor does not bestow.; sent1 -> int6: the traitor does bestow and is Romance if it is not heterodactyl.; sent2 -> int7: the traitor is not heterodactyl.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the traitor does bestow and is a kind of a Romance.; int8 -> int9: the traitor does bestow.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__