the Uruguayanness does not occur.
sent1: the covert does not occur. sent2: the smiting reckoner occurs. sent3: that the valvularness does not occur yields that the unmadeness does not occur and the khamsin does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the non-unmadeness and the valvularness occurs is not wrong then the Uruguayanness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the Uruguayan happens is true if the schism happens. sent6: that the allophonicness happens and the roughlegness occurs is incorrect. sent7: if that the scuffling does not occur is not false then the allophonicness does not occur but the roughleg happens. sent8: the psychosexualness happens. sent9: if the scuffling does not occur then the allophonicness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the unmadeness does not occur is right. sent11: the schism occurs if the unmadeness does not occur and the khamsin does not occur. sent12: the sepaloidness does not occur. sent13: the chordalness occurs. sent14: that the non-allophonicness and the roughing occurs is not correct if the valvularness occurs. sent15: the looseness occurs. sent16: that the dreaming inwardness occurs and the radiotherapy occurs is not right. sent17: the fact that not the slating but the speaking occurs is not right if the dreaming gasification occurs. sent18: the scuffling does not occur. sent19: the fact that both the allophonicness and the roughlegness occurs is not true if the valvularness happens. sent20: the fact that both the thermocautery and the nonimitativeness happens is not true if the exhaling pangolin occurs. sent21: the allophonicness does not occur. sent22: the unmadeness does not occur if the valvularness does not occur. sent23: the indexing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valvularness occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the allophonicness but the roughlegness occurs does not hold.; sent7 & sent18 -> int2: that not the allophonicness but the roughleg happens is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the valvularness does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the unmadeness does not occur and the khamsin does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the schism happens.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the Uruguayan does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Uruguayanness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the covert does not occur. sent2: the smiting reckoner occurs. sent3: that the valvularness does not occur yields that the unmadeness does not occur and the khamsin does not occur. sent4: if the fact that both the non-unmadeness and the valvularness occurs is not wrong then the Uruguayanness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the Uruguayan happens is true if the schism happens. sent6: that the allophonicness happens and the roughlegness occurs is incorrect. sent7: if that the scuffling does not occur is not false then the allophonicness does not occur but the roughleg happens. sent8: the psychosexualness happens. sent9: if the scuffling does not occur then the allophonicness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the unmadeness does not occur is right. sent11: the schism occurs if the unmadeness does not occur and the khamsin does not occur. sent12: the sepaloidness does not occur. sent13: the chordalness occurs. sent14: that the non-allophonicness and the roughing occurs is not correct if the valvularness occurs. sent15: the looseness occurs. sent16: that the dreaming inwardness occurs and the radiotherapy occurs is not right. sent17: the fact that not the slating but the speaking occurs is not right if the dreaming gasification occurs. sent18: the scuffling does not occur. sent19: the fact that both the allophonicness and the roughlegness occurs is not true if the valvularness happens. sent20: the fact that both the thermocautery and the nonimitativeness happens is not true if the exhaling pangolin occurs. sent21: the allophonicness does not occur. sent22: the unmadeness does not occur if the valvularness does not occur. sent23: the indexing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the valvularness occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that not the allophonicness but the roughlegness occurs does not hold.; sent7 & sent18 -> int2: that not the allophonicness but the roughleg happens is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the valvularness does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the unmadeness does not occur and the khamsin does not occur.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the schism happens.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__