that there is something such that if it does unbutton sentimentality then it is a kind of non-puerperal thing that is a Berkshires is false.
sent1: if something is hydroelectric then it is a wedge. sent2: the truncheon is a truncheon if it is puerperal. sent3: something is a kind of a color and it is a kind of a Vaduz if that it is early is not incorrect. sent4: if the pip does tusk nutritiousness it is a kind of a caper. sent5: if something does unbutton sentimentality then it is non-puerperal a Berkshires. sent6: there is something such that if it does unbutton sentimentality it is a kind of puerperal thing that is a Berkshires.
sent5 -> int1: the pip is non-puerperal thing that is a Berkshires if it unbuttons sentimentality.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does unbutton sentimentality then it is a kind of non-puerperal thing that is a Berkshires is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is hydroelectric then it is a wedge. sent2: the truncheon is a truncheon if it is puerperal. sent3: something is a kind of a color and it is a kind of a Vaduz if that it is early is not incorrect. sent4: if the pip does tusk nutritiousness it is a kind of a caper. sent5: if something does unbutton sentimentality then it is non-puerperal a Berkshires. sent6: there is something such that if it does unbutton sentimentality it is a kind of puerperal thing that is a Berkshires. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the pip is non-puerperal thing that is a Berkshires if it unbuttons sentimentality.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__