the heraldry is not a singles.
sent1: if the upright does redeploy phylactery then the fleapit is a tun. sent2: that the thruster is not vernal and it is not a rehash is not true if the upright is not a quadruplicate. sent3: the heraldry is not unprovocative if the fact that the thruster is unprovocative but it is mythic is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is both provocative and not grapelike is correct is not right the upright is not mythic. sent5: the heraldry is not singles if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a tun and it is limacine hold. sent6: something that is a redefinition is grapelike. sent7: if the upright is a redefinition then the fact that the thruster is not a redefinition is not correct. sent8: if the iron-tree is not detachable then the Chesterfield is a macule and it is limacine. sent9: if the upright is a redefinition the fleapit is a kind of a tun. sent10: the upright singles if that the heraldry redeploys phylactery hold. sent11: something is asynergic. sent12: something is a tipster. sent13: there exists something such that it is a quadruplicate. sent14: the iron-tree is not detachable. sent15: the upright is not a kind of a quadruplicate if the fact that it is both grapelike and a quadruplicate is false. sent16: if something is not mythic then it redeploys phylactery or is a redefinition or both. sent17: there is something such that it is a macule. sent18: the fleapit is limacine if the Chesterfield is limacine. sent19: there is something such that it is both provocative and not grapelike. sent20: that something is not unprovocative but it is mythic does not hold if it is not non-grapelike.
sent16 -> int1: if the upright is non-mythic it redeploys phylactery and/or is a kind of a redefinition.; sent8 & sent14 -> int2: the Chesterfield is a macule and it is limacine.; int2 -> int3: the Chesterfield is limacine.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the fleapit is not non-limacine.;
the heraldry is a kind of a singles.
sent20 -> int5: the fact that the thruster is a kind of non-unprovocative thing that is mythic is wrong if it is not non-grapelike.; sent6 -> int6: the thruster is not non-grapelike if the fact that it is a kind of a redefinition is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the heraldry is not a singles. ; $context$ = sent1: if the upright does redeploy phylactery then the fleapit is a tun. sent2: that the thruster is not vernal and it is not a rehash is not true if the upright is not a quadruplicate. sent3: the heraldry is not unprovocative if the fact that the thruster is unprovocative but it is mythic is not true. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is both provocative and not grapelike is correct is not right the upright is not mythic. sent5: the heraldry is not singles if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a tun and it is limacine hold. sent6: something that is a redefinition is grapelike. sent7: if the upright is a redefinition then the fact that the thruster is not a redefinition is not correct. sent8: if the iron-tree is not detachable then the Chesterfield is a macule and it is limacine. sent9: if the upright is a redefinition the fleapit is a kind of a tun. sent10: the upright singles if that the heraldry redeploys phylactery hold. sent11: something is asynergic. sent12: something is a tipster. sent13: there exists something such that it is a quadruplicate. sent14: the iron-tree is not detachable. sent15: the upright is not a kind of a quadruplicate if the fact that it is both grapelike and a quadruplicate is false. sent16: if something is not mythic then it redeploys phylactery or is a redefinition or both. sent17: there is something such that it is a macule. sent18: the fleapit is limacine if the Chesterfield is limacine. sent19: there is something such that it is both provocative and not grapelike. sent20: that something is not unprovocative but it is mythic does not hold if it is not non-grapelike. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: if the upright is non-mythic it redeploys phylactery and/or is a kind of a redefinition.; sent8 & sent14 -> int2: the Chesterfield is a macule and it is limacine.; int2 -> int3: the Chesterfield is limacine.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the fleapit is not non-limacine.; __UNKNOWN__