that there is something such that if that it does not patinate one-quintillionth and is pantheist is not correct it is a strength is incorrect.
sent1: the hilt is azonal if it does not capsule malignity and it is a kind of a Manama. sent2: if the hilt patinates one-quintillionth it is a kind of a strength. sent3: there is something such that if it does patinate one-quintillionth it is a strength. sent4: if that the hilt is not a kind of a color and is impious is false the fact that it is a pantheist is right. sent5: that there exists something such that if it does not patinate one-quintillionth and it is a pantheist then it is a strength is not incorrect. sent6: the tailorbird is Frostian if it is not a strength and it details Sagittarius. sent7: the hilt is undrinkable if the fact that it is not a Catha and is a kind of a pantheist is incorrect. sent8: if that something does not detail Sagittarius but it does patinate one-quintillionth is wrong it is a minocycline. sent9: there is something such that if it is not pantheist then it is a strength. sent10: the hilt is a strength if that it does not patinate one-quintillionth and it is a pantheist is not true.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if that the benedick does not detail Sagittarius and does patinate one-quintillionth is not right then it is a minocycline.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if that it does not patinate one-quintillionth and is pantheist is not correct it is a strength is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the hilt is azonal if it does not capsule malignity and it is a kind of a Manama. sent2: if the hilt patinates one-quintillionth it is a kind of a strength. sent3: there is something such that if it does patinate one-quintillionth it is a strength. sent4: if that the hilt is not a kind of a color and is impious is false the fact that it is a pantheist is right. sent5: that there exists something such that if it does not patinate one-quintillionth and it is a pantheist then it is a strength is not incorrect. sent6: the tailorbird is Frostian if it is not a strength and it details Sagittarius. sent7: the hilt is undrinkable if the fact that it is not a Catha and is a kind of a pantheist is incorrect. sent8: if that something does not detail Sagittarius but it does patinate one-quintillionth is wrong it is a minocycline. sent9: there is something such that if it is not pantheist then it is a strength. sent10: the hilt is a strength if that it does not patinate one-quintillionth and it is a pantheist is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__