the Ward is ultimate.
sent1: everything is a blemish and is not a kind of a Confucian. sent2: the channels is achromatic if the subaltern does blemish. sent3: if the Ward is a sashay then it is a kind of an ultimate. sent4: if something does deflect it is a sashay. sent5: if the fact that the ureter is not photographic is not correct then the Ward does deflect. sent6: the ureter is photographic if the channels is achromatic.
sent1 -> int1: the subaltern is a blemish but not a Confucian.; int1 -> int2: the subaltern blemishes.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the channels is achromatic.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the ureter is photographic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Ward does deflect.; sent4 -> int6: if the Ward does deflect then it is a kind of a sashay.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Ward is a sashay.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Ward is ultimate. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is a blemish and is not a kind of a Confucian. sent2: the channels is achromatic if the subaltern does blemish. sent3: if the Ward is a sashay then it is a kind of an ultimate. sent4: if something does deflect it is a sashay. sent5: if the fact that the ureter is not photographic is not correct then the Ward does deflect. sent6: the ureter is photographic if the channels is achromatic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the subaltern is a blemish but not a Confucian.; int1 -> int2: the subaltern blemishes.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the channels is achromatic.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the ureter is photographic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Ward does deflect.; sent4 -> int6: if the Ward does deflect then it is a kind of a sashay.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Ward is a sashay.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__