the higherness does not occur and the perfection does not occur.
sent1: that the bleaching occurs and the ravening possumwood does not occur is false. sent2: the liaison occurs. sent3: the non-backwardness leads to that the higherness does not occur and the perfection does not occur. sent4: the fact that the whiplash does not occur is correct if that the whiplash occurs but the amygdalotomy does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the antipodal does not occur. sent6: the liquefying Cephalotus happens. sent7: the liquefying dummy does not occur. sent8: the liquefying casern does not occur. sent9: if the ravening farina does not occur then that the irradiation happens and/or the self-help occurs is not correct. sent10: that the prawn does not occur yields that the timing does not occur and the aurifying reflexology does not occur. sent11: if the ravening farina occurs the liquefying Friesian happens. sent12: the cochlearness happens. sent13: the irradiation does not occur. sent14: the incalculableness does not occur and the stooging does not occur. sent15: if the nilpotentness does not occur the aurifying deterioration does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the irradiation or the self-help or both occurs does not hold then the fact that the backwardness does not occur is not wrong. sent17: that the supplementation does not occur if the fact that the breastlessness happens or the incalculableness occurs or both is wrong is true. sent18: if the liquefying Friesian happens then the fact that the whiplash does not occur and the ravening born does not occur is not correct. sent19: that the whiplash happens but the amygdalotomy does not occur does not hold. sent20: the bunker occurs. sent21: if the liaison happens then the ravening born does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ravening farina happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the liquefying Friesian does not occur is not right.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the whiplash does not occur and the ravening born does not occur is correct is not true.; sent4 & sent19 -> int3: the whiplash does not occur.; sent21 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the ravening born does not occur is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the whiplash does not occur and the ravening born does not occur.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the ravening farina does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: that either the irradiation or the self-help or both happens does not hold.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the backwardness does not occur.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the higherness does not occur and the perfection does not occur is not true.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the higherness does not occur and the perfection does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bleaching occurs and the ravening possumwood does not occur is false. sent2: the liaison occurs. sent3: the non-backwardness leads to that the higherness does not occur and the perfection does not occur. sent4: the fact that the whiplash does not occur is correct if that the whiplash occurs but the amygdalotomy does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the antipodal does not occur. sent6: the liquefying Cephalotus happens. sent7: the liquefying dummy does not occur. sent8: the liquefying casern does not occur. sent9: if the ravening farina does not occur then that the irradiation happens and/or the self-help occurs is not correct. sent10: that the prawn does not occur yields that the timing does not occur and the aurifying reflexology does not occur. sent11: if the ravening farina occurs the liquefying Friesian happens. sent12: the cochlearness happens. sent13: the irradiation does not occur. sent14: the incalculableness does not occur and the stooging does not occur. sent15: if the nilpotentness does not occur the aurifying deterioration does not occur. sent16: if the fact that the irradiation or the self-help or both occurs does not hold then the fact that the backwardness does not occur is not wrong. sent17: that the supplementation does not occur if the fact that the breastlessness happens or the incalculableness occurs or both is wrong is true. sent18: if the liquefying Friesian happens then the fact that the whiplash does not occur and the ravening born does not occur is not correct. sent19: that the whiplash happens but the amygdalotomy does not occur does not hold. sent20: the bunker occurs. sent21: if the liaison happens then the ravening born does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ravening farina happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the liquefying Friesian does not occur is not right.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the whiplash does not occur and the ravening born does not occur is correct is not true.; sent4 & sent19 -> int3: the whiplash does not occur.; sent21 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the ravening born does not occur is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the whiplash does not occur and the ravening born does not occur.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the ravening farina does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: that either the irradiation or the self-help or both happens does not hold.; int8 & sent16 -> int9: the backwardness does not occur.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__