there exists something such that if it is physiological that it is a kind of a Cornell and it is not a kind of a dereliction is not correct.
sent1: that something is a field and not apteral is wrong if that it dissents calcimine is true. sent2: there exists something such that if it is physiological then the fact that it is a kind of a Cornell and it is a kind of a dereliction does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it blinds the fact that it is appropriate and it does not dissent calcimine does not hold. sent4: that something is unneurotic thing that does not guarantee freewheeling is incorrect if it is a kind of a Cornell. sent5: there is something such that if it is physiological then it is a Cornell and it is not a dereliction. sent6: if the casting is physiological then that it is a kind of a Cornell and it is a kind of a dereliction is not true. sent7: that something moralizes but it does not pleat is false if it is adenoidal. sent8: if something dissents ultramontane then that it is cytogenetic and is not a lipped does not hold. sent9: if something is a streaker then the fact that it is Alaskan and not regretful is not correct. sent10: that something is a Cornell that is a dereliction is incorrect if it is physiological. sent11: if the casting is a kind of a lipped then the fact that it is alkylic thing that is not uncousinly is false. sent12: that something is a kind of a cress that does not process mullein is incorrect if that it does dissent carbon is true. sent13: the casting is a kind of a Cornell that is not a dereliction if that it is physiological is right. sent14: something is a Cornell and is not a dereliction if it is physiological. sent15: if the fact that the carbon is a kind of an exit hold that it is a kind of a blaxploitation and it does not dissent tent is not true. sent16: the fact that the casting does process pastorship but it is not a dereliction is false if it is tactile.
the fact that the calcimine is unneurotic thing that does not guarantee freewheeling does not hold if the fact that it is a kind of a Cornell hold.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is physiological that it is a kind of a Cornell and it is not a kind of a dereliction is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a field and not apteral is wrong if that it dissents calcimine is true. sent2: there exists something such that if it is physiological then the fact that it is a kind of a Cornell and it is a kind of a dereliction does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it blinds the fact that it is appropriate and it does not dissent calcimine does not hold. sent4: that something is unneurotic thing that does not guarantee freewheeling is incorrect if it is a kind of a Cornell. sent5: there is something such that if it is physiological then it is a Cornell and it is not a dereliction. sent6: if the casting is physiological then that it is a kind of a Cornell and it is a kind of a dereliction is not true. sent7: that something moralizes but it does not pleat is false if it is adenoidal. sent8: if something dissents ultramontane then that it is cytogenetic and is not a lipped does not hold. sent9: if something is a streaker then the fact that it is Alaskan and not regretful is not correct. sent10: that something is a Cornell that is a dereliction is incorrect if it is physiological. sent11: if the casting is a kind of a lipped then the fact that it is alkylic thing that is not uncousinly is false. sent12: that something is a kind of a cress that does not process mullein is incorrect if that it does dissent carbon is true. sent13: the casting is a kind of a Cornell that is not a dereliction if that it is physiological is right. sent14: something is a Cornell and is not a dereliction if it is physiological. sent15: if the fact that the carbon is a kind of an exit hold that it is a kind of a blaxploitation and it does not dissent tent is not true. sent16: the fact that the casting does process pastorship but it is not a dereliction is false if it is tactile. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__