the fact that the fluctuation prevents that the flogging does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the delivery does not occur if the fact that the fluctuation does not occur and the linebacker does not occur does not hold. sent2: that both the diamantineness and the integrating hostility happens is not true if the fact that the delivery does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the linebacker happens. sent4: the fact that not the fluctuation but the linebacker occurs is wrong. sent5: the fact that the fluctuation occurs but the linebacker does not occur does not hold. sent6: that both the non-parliamentariness and the non-Jacobinicness occurs does not hold. sent7: if that the diamantineness but not the integrating hostility happens is wrong the flogging occurs. sent8: if the tubeless occurs then the literate happens. sent9: if that the plastering does not occur and the boards does not occur does not hold the vetoing does not occur. sent10: that the diamantineness happens but the integrating hostility does not occur is wrong if the delivery does not occur. sent11: if the perinatalness does not occur and the platonicness does not occur the cleaningness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the diamantineness and the integrating hostility happens is wrong. sent13: the mystifying soundboard happens. sent14: that the visitation but not the smell happens is wrong if the circumvention does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluctuation happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fluctuation does not occur and the linebacker does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the fluctuation does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fluctuation does not occur and the linebacker does not occur does not hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the delivery does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the diamantineness but not the integrating hostility occurs is false.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the flogging occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fluctuation prevents that the flogging does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the delivery does not occur if the fact that the fluctuation does not occur and the linebacker does not occur does not hold. sent2: that both the diamantineness and the integrating hostility happens is not true if the fact that the delivery does not occur is not wrong. sent3: the linebacker happens. sent4: the fact that not the fluctuation but the linebacker occurs is wrong. sent5: the fact that the fluctuation occurs but the linebacker does not occur does not hold. sent6: that both the non-parliamentariness and the non-Jacobinicness occurs does not hold. sent7: if that the diamantineness but not the integrating hostility happens is wrong the flogging occurs. sent8: if the tubeless occurs then the literate happens. sent9: if that the plastering does not occur and the boards does not occur does not hold the vetoing does not occur. sent10: that the diamantineness happens but the integrating hostility does not occur is wrong if the delivery does not occur. sent11: if the perinatalness does not occur and the platonicness does not occur the cleaningness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the diamantineness and the integrating hostility happens is wrong. sent13: the mystifying soundboard happens. sent14: that the visitation but not the smell happens is wrong if the circumvention does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluctuation happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fluctuation does not occur and the linebacker does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the fluctuation does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fluctuation does not occur and the linebacker does not occur does not hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the delivery does not occur.; sent10 & int4 -> int5: that the diamantineness but not the integrating hostility occurs is false.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the flogging occurs.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__