the garlic is regressive or it does not punish garlic or both if the vulcanization is not atheist.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is not regressive the garlic is an atheist and/or does not punish storminess. sent2: the joiner is not an atheist. sent3: if there is something such that it does not punish storminess then the garlic is regressive or it punishes garlic or both. sent4: the vulcanization is an atheist if it does punish storminess. sent5: the garlic punishes garlic if it is an atheist. sent6: there exists something such that it punishes garlic. sent7: if something is a facelift then it is diurnal. sent8: there exists something such that it is not regressive. sent9: if the vulcanization does not punish garlic then the garlic punishes storminess and/or is non-atheist. sent10: there exists something such that it does hue speedboat. sent11: the vulcanization is an atheist or is not regressive or both if that something does not punish garlic hold. sent12: the vulcanization either is regressive or is not an atheist or both if the garlic does not punish storminess. sent13: either the garlic does punish storminess or it is regressive or both. sent14: the garlic is not a kind of a squatness. sent15: if there is something such that it does not punish storminess then the garlic is regressive or it does not punish garlic or both. sent16: if something does not punish storminess then the garlic is an atheist and/or does not punish garlic. sent17: the garlic is not a Durban.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the vulcanization punishes storminess.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the vulcanization is atheist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vulcanization is not an atheist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the vulcanization does not punish storminess.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does not punish storminess.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: that the garlic is regressive or does not punish garlic or both is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the operculum is diurnal if the operculum is a facelift is correct.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the garlic is regressive or it does not punish garlic or both if the vulcanization is not atheist. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is not regressive the garlic is an atheist and/or does not punish storminess. sent2: the joiner is not an atheist. sent3: if there is something such that it does not punish storminess then the garlic is regressive or it punishes garlic or both. sent4: the vulcanization is an atheist if it does punish storminess. sent5: the garlic punishes garlic if it is an atheist. sent6: there exists something such that it punishes garlic. sent7: if something is a facelift then it is diurnal. sent8: there exists something such that it is not regressive. sent9: if the vulcanization does not punish garlic then the garlic punishes storminess and/or is non-atheist. sent10: there exists something such that it does hue speedboat. sent11: the vulcanization is an atheist or is not regressive or both if that something does not punish garlic hold. sent12: the vulcanization either is regressive or is not an atheist or both if the garlic does not punish storminess. sent13: either the garlic does punish storminess or it is regressive or both. sent14: the garlic is not a kind of a squatness. sent15: if there is something such that it does not punish storminess then the garlic is regressive or it does not punish garlic or both. sent16: if something does not punish storminess then the garlic is an atheist and/or does not punish garlic. sent17: the garlic is not a Durban. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the vulcanization punishes storminess.; sent4 & assump2 -> int1: the vulcanization is atheist.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vulcanization is not an atheist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the vulcanization does not punish storminess.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it does not punish storminess.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: that the garlic is regressive or does not punish garlic or both is not incorrect.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__