the fact that the disproof happens but the campaign does not occur is not correct.
sent1: the hydrostaticsness does not occur. sent2: the deification occurs. sent3: the fusillading but not the unsensationalness happens. sent4: the fact that the campaigning does not occur is true if the gastroscopy does not occur. sent5: the fact that the leaning neuropathy occurs hold if the fact that the circle does not occur and the immortalness does not occur is false. sent6: the repining waffle does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the cable does not occur hold then the disproof and the condescending happens. sent8: if the gastroscopy happens that the circling does not occur and the immortalness does not occur is not correct. sent9: the interposing does not occur if either the disposable or the leaning neuropathy or both occurs. sent10: that the underageness happens but the recruitment does not occur does not hold. sent11: the fact that both the circle and the non-immortalness occurs does not hold if the gastroscopy happens. sent12: the repining rain-wash happens. sent13: the interposing and the radiotherapy occurs. sent14: the deification but not the cable happens. sent15: the incontinentness happens if that the fact that the repining frog does not occur and the better does not occur is incorrect is true. sent16: that the interposing occurs is prevented by that the disposableness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gastroscopy occurs hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the circling does not occur and the immortal does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the leaning neuropathy occurs.; int2 -> int3: the disposableness occurs and/or the leaning neuropathy occurs.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the interposing does not occur.; sent13 -> int5: that the interposing happens hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gastroscopy does not occur.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the campaign does not occur.; sent14 -> int9: that the cabling does not occur is not incorrect.; sent7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that both the disproof and the condescending occurs is not wrong.; int10 -> int11: the disproof occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the disproof happens but the campaign does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the hydrostaticsness does not occur. sent2: the deification occurs. sent3: the fusillading but not the unsensationalness happens. sent4: the fact that the campaigning does not occur is true if the gastroscopy does not occur. sent5: the fact that the leaning neuropathy occurs hold if the fact that the circle does not occur and the immortalness does not occur is false. sent6: the repining waffle does not occur. sent7: if the fact that the cable does not occur hold then the disproof and the condescending happens. sent8: if the gastroscopy happens that the circling does not occur and the immortalness does not occur is not correct. sent9: the interposing does not occur if either the disposable or the leaning neuropathy or both occurs. sent10: that the underageness happens but the recruitment does not occur does not hold. sent11: the fact that both the circle and the non-immortalness occurs does not hold if the gastroscopy happens. sent12: the repining rain-wash happens. sent13: the interposing and the radiotherapy occurs. sent14: the deification but not the cable happens. sent15: the incontinentness happens if that the fact that the repining frog does not occur and the better does not occur is incorrect is true. sent16: that the interposing occurs is prevented by that the disposableness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the gastroscopy occurs hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the circling does not occur and the immortal does not occur does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the leaning neuropathy occurs.; int2 -> int3: the disposableness occurs and/or the leaning neuropathy occurs.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the interposing does not occur.; sent13 -> int5: that the interposing happens hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the gastroscopy does not occur.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the campaign does not occur.; sent14 -> int9: that the cabling does not occur is not incorrect.; sent7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that both the disproof and the condescending occurs is not wrong.; int10 -> int11: the disproof occurs.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__