that there is something such that if it is culinary then it does not wattle and/or it does patinate does not hold.
sent1: if the dulse is a wattle then it does not overawe corruption and/or is a kind of a Pseudoryx. sent2: there exists something such that if it is linguistic the fact that it is not counterclockwise or it is chiromantic or both is not incorrect. sent3: the Iowa does not overawe soldiering and/or is a kind of a sugarberry if it is sarcolemmal. sent4: something does not gauge leavened and/or is a Karnataka if it is a wattle. sent5: there is something such that if it is wary then either it does not tag ointment or it is a rhodochrosite or both. sent6: that either the Iowa does tag ointment or it is the wattle or both if the Iowa does tag tormenter is correct. sent7: if the Iowa does overawe windstorm then it is a kind of a wattle and/or it is a nipa. sent8: there is something such that if it is unwomanly then it is a brutality or it is apteral or both. sent9: something is not a pyrolatry or it is a voice or both if it is a Gothic. sent10: either the Iowa is not metamorphous or it is a nominative or both if it does wattle. sent11: either the Iowa is not a LSD or it does overawe contrary or both if it overawes soldiering. sent12: that the Iowa is not a kind of a wattle and/or patinates is true if it is culinary. sent13: if the Iowa is a kind of a Papua it is not bronchoscopic and/or is culinary. sent14: the Iowa does not overawe Iowa and/or does wattle if it is not non-Scandinavian. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not non-culinary is not wrong either it is a wattle or it does patinate or both. sent16: if that the Iowa is culinary is not false it either does wattle or does patinate or both. sent17: the Iowa is not cardinal or it is afebrile or both if it tags tormenter. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a minstrel that either it does not negate Hynerpeton or it is unwomanly or both is not wrong. sent19: there exists something such that if it is idiomatic then it is not arborical or a narrow-body or both. sent20: if the Iowa is culinary then it does not compound and/or it does hand.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
if the nigger is a kind of a wattle then it does not gauge leavened or it is a Karnataka or both.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is culinary then it does not wattle and/or it does patinate does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dulse is a wattle then it does not overawe corruption and/or is a kind of a Pseudoryx. sent2: there exists something such that if it is linguistic the fact that it is not counterclockwise or it is chiromantic or both is not incorrect. sent3: the Iowa does not overawe soldiering and/or is a kind of a sugarberry if it is sarcolemmal. sent4: something does not gauge leavened and/or is a Karnataka if it is a wattle. sent5: there is something such that if it is wary then either it does not tag ointment or it is a rhodochrosite or both. sent6: that either the Iowa does tag ointment or it is the wattle or both if the Iowa does tag tormenter is correct. sent7: if the Iowa does overawe windstorm then it is a kind of a wattle and/or it is a nipa. sent8: there is something such that if it is unwomanly then it is a brutality or it is apteral or both. sent9: something is not a pyrolatry or it is a voice or both if it is a Gothic. sent10: either the Iowa is not metamorphous or it is a nominative or both if it does wattle. sent11: either the Iowa is not a LSD or it does overawe contrary or both if it overawes soldiering. sent12: that the Iowa is not a kind of a wattle and/or patinates is true if it is culinary. sent13: if the Iowa is a kind of a Papua it is not bronchoscopic and/or is culinary. sent14: the Iowa does not overawe Iowa and/or does wattle if it is not non-Scandinavian. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that it is not non-culinary is not wrong either it is a wattle or it does patinate or both. sent16: if that the Iowa is culinary is not false it either does wattle or does patinate or both. sent17: the Iowa is not cardinal or it is afebrile or both if it tags tormenter. sent18: there exists something such that if it is a minstrel that either it does not negate Hynerpeton or it is unwomanly or both is not wrong. sent19: there exists something such that if it is idiomatic then it is not arborical or a narrow-body or both. sent20: if the Iowa is culinary then it does not compound and/or it does hand. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__