the honeysuckle is not a kind of a Brahma and it is not a duplex.
sent1: that the honeysuckle is not a oligosaccharide but it does pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent2: the mosque is Alaskan thing that is a Caloosahatchee. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a oligosaccharide and it does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent4: if something is not a kind of a Alaskan the fact that it is not a kind of a Brahma and it does not duplex is not right. sent5: the honeysuckle is not a brandyball. sent6: if the fact that something does duplex and is accentual does not hold then it does not duplex. sent7: that the mosque is not Alaskan is correct if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a oligosaccharide and it does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent8: if the honeysuckle is a kind of a Brahma that it is not a oligosaccharide and does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent9: something that is not a brandyball but accentual is not a Alaskan. sent10: something is both not a brandyball and not non-accentual if that it is not a Caloosahatchee is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the honeysuckle is a Brahma.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the honeysuckle is not a oligosaccharide and it does not pattern honeysuckle is not true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not a oligosaccharide and does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the mosque is not a Alaskan hold.; sent2 -> int4: the mosque is Alaskan.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the honeysuckle is not a Brahma.; sent6 -> int7: if that the honeysuckle is a duplex that is accentual does not hold then it is not a duplex.;
that the honeysuckle is both not a Brahma and not a duplex does not hold.
sent4 -> int8: if the honeysuckle is not a Alaskan then the fact that it is not a kind of a Brahma and it is not a duplex does not hold.; sent9 -> int9: if that the honeysuckle is not a brandyball but accentual is not wrong the fact that it is not Alaskan is right.; sent10 -> int10: if the honeysuckle is not a Caloosahatchee it is not a brandyball but accentual.;
$hypothesis$ = the honeysuckle is not a kind of a Brahma and it is not a duplex. ; $context$ = sent1: that the honeysuckle is not a oligosaccharide but it does pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent2: the mosque is Alaskan thing that is a Caloosahatchee. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a oligosaccharide and it does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent4: if something is not a kind of a Alaskan the fact that it is not a kind of a Brahma and it does not duplex is not right. sent5: the honeysuckle is not a brandyball. sent6: if the fact that something does duplex and is accentual does not hold then it does not duplex. sent7: that the mosque is not Alaskan is correct if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a oligosaccharide and it does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent8: if the honeysuckle is a kind of a Brahma that it is not a oligosaccharide and does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct. sent9: something that is not a brandyball but accentual is not a Alaskan. sent10: something is both not a brandyball and not non-accentual if that it is not a Caloosahatchee is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the honeysuckle is a Brahma.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: that the honeysuckle is not a oligosaccharide and it does not pattern honeysuckle is not true.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is not a oligosaccharide and does not pattern honeysuckle is not correct.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the mosque is not a Alaskan hold.; sent2 -> int4: the mosque is Alaskan.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the honeysuckle is not a Brahma.; sent6 -> int7: if that the honeysuckle is a duplex that is accentual does not hold then it is not a duplex.; __UNKNOWN__