that the narrating Wyrd occurs is brought about by the amelioration.
sent1: that the fact that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration occurs is wrong hold. sent2: the crab happens. sent3: the aromaticness does not occur. sent4: the show-stopper occurs. sent5: the fact that the subjecting Cretaceous happens and the grievance happens is false if the fact that the narcotraffic does not occur hold. sent6: that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur prevents that the narrating Wyrd does not occur. sent7: if the impoliteness does not occur then the myrmecophyticness and the narrating conscientiousness occurs. sent8: if the schottische happens the generativeness happens. sent9: the fact that the indeterminateness does not occur and the appropriation does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the high-low does not occur and the cheapness does not occur does not hold the microscopy happens. sent11: the liposuction occurs. sent12: if that the mechanisticness does not occur and the depriving tellurium does not occur is not correct then the scourge occurs. sent13: the narcotraffic does not occur and the narrating geminate does not occur if the myrmecophyticness happens. sent14: if that the catachresticness and the impoliteness occurs is not right the impoliteness does not occur. sent15: the depriving camouflaged is prevented by that the fingering and the non-parotidness happens. sent16: the fact that the fact that the meatlessness but not the amelioration happens is not false is false. sent17: if the depriving camouflaged does not occur then the fact that the catachresticness occurs and the impoliteness occurs is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the subjecting Cretaceous and the grievance happens is not correct the fact that the narrating Wyrd does not occur is not incorrect. sent19: the tenderness happens if the amelioration does not occur and the meatlessness does not occur. sent20: the non-chronologicalness and the non-generativeness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the amelioration does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amelioration happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur is not correct.;
the tenderness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the narrating Wyrd occurs is brought about by the amelioration. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration occurs is wrong hold. sent2: the crab happens. sent3: the aromaticness does not occur. sent4: the show-stopper occurs. sent5: the fact that the subjecting Cretaceous happens and the grievance happens is false if the fact that the narcotraffic does not occur hold. sent6: that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur prevents that the narrating Wyrd does not occur. sent7: if the impoliteness does not occur then the myrmecophyticness and the narrating conscientiousness occurs. sent8: if the schottische happens the generativeness happens. sent9: the fact that the indeterminateness does not occur and the appropriation does not occur does not hold. sent10: if the fact that the high-low does not occur and the cheapness does not occur does not hold the microscopy happens. sent11: the liposuction occurs. sent12: if that the mechanisticness does not occur and the depriving tellurium does not occur is not correct then the scourge occurs. sent13: the narcotraffic does not occur and the narrating geminate does not occur if the myrmecophyticness happens. sent14: if that the catachresticness and the impoliteness occurs is not right the impoliteness does not occur. sent15: the depriving camouflaged is prevented by that the fingering and the non-parotidness happens. sent16: the fact that the fact that the meatlessness but not the amelioration happens is not false is false. sent17: if the depriving camouflaged does not occur then the fact that the catachresticness occurs and the impoliteness occurs is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the subjecting Cretaceous and the grievance happens is not correct the fact that the narrating Wyrd does not occur is not incorrect. sent19: the tenderness happens if the amelioration does not occur and the meatlessness does not occur. sent20: the non-chronologicalness and the non-generativeness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur.; assump2 -> int1: the amelioration does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amelioration happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the meatlessness does not occur and the amelioration does not occur is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__