the fact that if the infusion happens that the Zephyr does not occur and the recasting tapped occurs does not hold does not hold.
sent1: that the Zephyr does not occur and the recasting tapped occurs causes that the infusion does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Zephyr does not occur but the recasting tapped happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the infusion does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the infusion happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the Zephyr does not occur but the recasting tapped happens is not incorrect is incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the infusion happens that the Zephyr does not occur and the recasting tapped occurs does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Zephyr does not occur and the recasting tapped occurs causes that the infusion does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Zephyr does not occur but the recasting tapped happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the infusion does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the infusion happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the Zephyr does not occur but the recasting tapped happens is not incorrect is incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__