the enamel does not incriminate Fasciolidae but it does chance enamel.
sent1: there is something such that that it does incriminate premium and it is Puranic is not true. sent2: something does incriminate premium and is not Puranic. sent3: the street is a Jungian. sent4: if something does not kneel the fact that it does incriminate premium and is not non-Puranic does not hold. sent5: if the enamel is a AEC then it does not incriminate Fasciolidae and chances enamel. sent6: if that the enamel is a AEC is not wrong then it does not incriminate Fasciolidae. sent7: if the enamel is not a kneel that it incriminates premium and is Puranic is incorrect. sent8: the street is protozoal if the fact that there is something such that that it does incriminate premium and it is not Puranic does not hold hold. sent9: the enamel does not incriminate Fasciolidae. sent10: the street does incriminate premium. sent11: the Geneva chances enamel. sent12: the enamel is Jungian if the fact that it does kneel is true. sent13: the fact that something incriminates premium but it is not Puranic is not right if it is not a kneel. sent14: the enamel is a AEC if it is a kind of a Jungian. sent15: if there are Puranic things the street is protozoal. sent16: if something does assail Canidae it does chance enamel.
sent13 -> int1: if the enamel does not kneel the fact that it does incriminate premium and it is not Puranic is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enamel is not a kneel.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the enamel does incriminate premium and is not Puranic is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does incriminate premium and is not Puranic does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the street is protozoal.;
if the enamel does assail Canidae it does chance enamel.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the enamel does not incriminate Fasciolidae but it does chance enamel. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it does incriminate premium and it is Puranic is not true. sent2: something does incriminate premium and is not Puranic. sent3: the street is a Jungian. sent4: if something does not kneel the fact that it does incriminate premium and is not non-Puranic does not hold. sent5: if the enamel is a AEC then it does not incriminate Fasciolidae and chances enamel. sent6: if that the enamel is a AEC is not wrong then it does not incriminate Fasciolidae. sent7: if the enamel is not a kneel that it incriminates premium and is Puranic is incorrect. sent8: the street is protozoal if the fact that there is something such that that it does incriminate premium and it is not Puranic does not hold hold. sent9: the enamel does not incriminate Fasciolidae. sent10: the street does incriminate premium. sent11: the Geneva chances enamel. sent12: the enamel is Jungian if the fact that it does kneel is true. sent13: the fact that something incriminates premium but it is not Puranic is not right if it is not a kneel. sent14: the enamel is a AEC if it is a kind of a Jungian. sent15: if there are Puranic things the street is protozoal. sent16: if something does assail Canidae it does chance enamel. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the enamel does not kneel the fact that it does incriminate premium and it is not Puranic is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enamel is not a kneel.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the enamel does incriminate premium and is not Puranic is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does incriminate premium and is not Puranic does not hold.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the street is protozoal.; __UNKNOWN__