the cubitiere does not defray gourmandism and is a interphone.
sent1: the Tartuffe is not a karate. sent2: if the prophetess is a Cassirer then the cubitiere does not defray gourmandism and is a interphone. sent3: if the Tartuffe is not a kind of a karate then the prophetess is a Cassirer and is a sourness. sent4: the fact that the Tartuffe does not pant-hoot but it is a kind of a bumptiousness is not true if the prophetess is a ophthalmectomy. sent5: if something is not a karate then the fact that it does not defray gourmandism and is a interphone does not hold.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the prophetess is a Cassirer that is a sourness.; int1 -> int2: the prophetess is a kind of a Cassirer.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cubitiere does not defray gourmandism and is a interphone does not hold.
sent5 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the cubitiere does not defray gourmandism but it is the interphone is not true if the cubitiere is not a karate is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the cubitiere does not defray gourmandism and is a interphone. ; $context$ = sent1: the Tartuffe is not a karate. sent2: if the prophetess is a Cassirer then the cubitiere does not defray gourmandism and is a interphone. sent3: if the Tartuffe is not a kind of a karate then the prophetess is a Cassirer and is a sourness. sent4: the fact that the Tartuffe does not pant-hoot but it is a kind of a bumptiousness is not true if the prophetess is a ophthalmectomy. sent5: if something is not a karate then the fact that it does not defray gourmandism and is a interphone does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the prophetess is a Cassirer that is a sourness.; int1 -> int2: the prophetess is a kind of a Cassirer.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__