if the candle is a coachwhip the fact that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae is not true.
sent1: if something is not a Notoryctidae then it does crossbreed vesture and is a coachwhip. sent2: if the candle is a coachwhip the fact that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae hold. sent3: that the interrupt is a kind of a Notoryctidae that is not a coachwhip is wrong if the candle is a kind of a alpha-interferon. sent4: there exists something such that it is a fiberboard. sent5: the fact that if something is a coachwhip then that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae is incorrect is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the fact that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon and it is a kind of a Notoryctidae is not false does not hold. sent7: the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a kind of a Notoryctidae if there exists something such that it is a coachwhip. sent8: that the interrupt is both a alpha-interferon and a Notoryctidae is not correct if the candle is a coachwhip. sent9: that the candle is a coachwhip and is not a Notoryctidae is not true. sent10: if there is something such that it is a coachwhip then that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon and it is a Notoryctidae does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the candle is a coachwhip.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a kind of a coachwhip is not incorrect.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the interrupt is a kind of a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae is incorrect.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
something does crossbreed vesture.
sent1 -> int3: the interrupt does crossbreed vesture and it is a coachwhip if that it is not a Notoryctidae is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = if the candle is a coachwhip the fact that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a Notoryctidae then it does crossbreed vesture and is a coachwhip. sent2: if the candle is a coachwhip the fact that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae hold. sent3: that the interrupt is a kind of a Notoryctidae that is not a coachwhip is wrong if the candle is a kind of a alpha-interferon. sent4: there exists something such that it is a fiberboard. sent5: the fact that if something is a coachwhip then that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae is incorrect is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the fact that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon and it is a kind of a Notoryctidae is not false does not hold. sent7: the interrupt is a alpha-interferon but it is not a kind of a Notoryctidae if there exists something such that it is a coachwhip. sent8: that the interrupt is both a alpha-interferon and a Notoryctidae is not correct if the candle is a coachwhip. sent9: that the candle is a coachwhip and is not a Notoryctidae is not true. sent10: if there is something such that it is a coachwhip then that the interrupt is a alpha-interferon and it is a Notoryctidae does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the candle is a coachwhip.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a kind of a coachwhip is not incorrect.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the interrupt is a kind of a alpha-interferon but it is not a Notoryctidae is incorrect.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__