the fact that the dimer does meet subthalamus but it does not receive executive is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Gosainthan that does not receive executive is not correct. sent2: the antimalarial does seek earflap and is a grass. sent3: that the dimer meets subthalamus and does not receive executive is not correct if the antimalarial does not receive executive. sent4: the dimer is a hammock. sent5: if the antimalarial is a hammock then it is a kind of a refrigerator. sent6: there is something such that that it despairs and it is not a gonad is not true. sent7: the antimalarial is a hammock if the bunk is not a cryptogram and it does not seek lobotomy. sent8: the antimalarial meets tenured. sent9: the radiopacity is benedictory a hammock. sent10: if the dimer meets subthalamus and it does seek earflap then it does not receive executive. sent11: if the antimalarial is a kind of a refrigerator that does receive executive then it is not a grass. sent12: if something does nose workforce and is ohmic it is not a refrigerator. sent13: if the antimalarial does not seek earflap and receives executive then the dimer is a hammock. sent14: something is a Gosainthan if it is not a cryptogram. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it does despair and it is a gonad does not hold. sent16: the fact that the dowser is a refrigerator hold. sent17: something does meet subthalamus and does not receive executive if it is a Gosainthan. sent18: if the dowser is not a kind of a Gosainthan the bunk is not a cryptogram and does not seek lobotomy. sent19: there is something such that it does receive executive and does not seek earflap.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antimalarial does receive executive.; sent2 -> int1: the antimalarial grasses.;
if the elephant's-foot noses workforce and it is ohmic then it is not a refrigerator.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dimer does meet subthalamus but it does not receive executive is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Gosainthan that does not receive executive is not correct. sent2: the antimalarial does seek earflap and is a grass. sent3: that the dimer meets subthalamus and does not receive executive is not correct if the antimalarial does not receive executive. sent4: the dimer is a hammock. sent5: if the antimalarial is a hammock then it is a kind of a refrigerator. sent6: there is something such that that it despairs and it is not a gonad is not true. sent7: the antimalarial is a hammock if the bunk is not a cryptogram and it does not seek lobotomy. sent8: the antimalarial meets tenured. sent9: the radiopacity is benedictory a hammock. sent10: if the dimer meets subthalamus and it does seek earflap then it does not receive executive. sent11: if the antimalarial is a kind of a refrigerator that does receive executive then it is not a grass. sent12: if something does nose workforce and is ohmic it is not a refrigerator. sent13: if the antimalarial does not seek earflap and receives executive then the dimer is a hammock. sent14: something is a Gosainthan if it is not a cryptogram. sent15: there exists something such that the fact that it does despair and it is a gonad does not hold. sent16: the fact that the dowser is a refrigerator hold. sent17: something does meet subthalamus and does not receive executive if it is a Gosainthan. sent18: if the dowser is not a kind of a Gosainthan the bunk is not a cryptogram and does not seek lobotomy. sent19: there is something such that it does receive executive and does not seek earflap. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antimalarial does receive executive.; sent2 -> int1: the antimalarial grasses.; __UNKNOWN__