that there exists something such that if it is not sciatic and it is not atomic it is not papillary is not true.
sent1: the fact that the biocatalyst is not a Hymen is right if it is not cervine and it is not papillary. sent2: there is something such that if it is not quantal and is an edge it is not a kind of a obsoleteness. sent3: the kapok is not non-papillary if it is non-sciatic thing that is not atomic. sent4: that the kapok is not papillary is correct if it is sciatic and is not atomic. sent5: if something that is sciatic is not atomic the fact that it is not papillary hold. sent6: if the kapok is non-larval thing that is sciatic then it is not an ordinary. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not sciatic but atomic then it is not papillary. sent8: if something that is not a Ibsen does not malinger corythosaur it does not undress ABB. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a doctor and it is not a rennet it is not a kind of a audibility. sent10: there is something such that if it is not sciatic and it is not atomic then it is papillary. sent11: if the kapok is not sciatic but atomic it is not papillary. sent12: there exists something such that if it is sciatic and it is not atomic it is not papillary. sent13: something that is both not sciatic and not atomic is not papillary. sent14: if the kapok does not undress Spirodela and is a kind of an aureole then the fact that it is not papillary is not incorrect. sent15: if the span is not bacteriolytic and it is not atomic then it is a Gdansk. sent16: if something that does not pigment is not black-and-white it is not morphophonemic. sent17: if something is not sciatic but atomic it is not papillary. sent18: something is not a kind of a telescope if it is a kind of non-mutational thing that does bop semibreve. sent19: if something is not sciatic and it is not atomic then it is not papillary.
sent19 -> int1: the kapok is not papillary if it is non-sciatic and is not atomic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not sciatic and it is not atomic it is not papillary is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the biocatalyst is not a Hymen is right if it is not cervine and it is not papillary. sent2: there is something such that if it is not quantal and is an edge it is not a kind of a obsoleteness. sent3: the kapok is not non-papillary if it is non-sciatic thing that is not atomic. sent4: that the kapok is not papillary is correct if it is sciatic and is not atomic. sent5: if something that is sciatic is not atomic the fact that it is not papillary hold. sent6: if the kapok is non-larval thing that is sciatic then it is not an ordinary. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not sciatic but atomic then it is not papillary. sent8: if something that is not a Ibsen does not malinger corythosaur it does not undress ABB. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a doctor and it is not a rennet it is not a kind of a audibility. sent10: there is something such that if it is not sciatic and it is not atomic then it is papillary. sent11: if the kapok is not sciatic but atomic it is not papillary. sent12: there exists something such that if it is sciatic and it is not atomic it is not papillary. sent13: something that is both not sciatic and not atomic is not papillary. sent14: if the kapok does not undress Spirodela and is a kind of an aureole then the fact that it is not papillary is not incorrect. sent15: if the span is not bacteriolytic and it is not atomic then it is a Gdansk. sent16: if something that does not pigment is not black-and-white it is not morphophonemic. sent17: if something is not sciatic but atomic it is not papillary. sent18: something is not a kind of a telescope if it is a kind of non-mutational thing that does bop semibreve. sent19: if something is not sciatic and it is not atomic then it is not papillary. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the kapok is not papillary if it is non-sciatic and is not atomic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__