the fact that there exists something such that if it does not style banter then the fact that it is a disposable is not false is wrong.
sent1: the propyl is not a towline if the kishke does style banter and is not disposable. sent2: the span is a sharp that is a page. sent3: the propyl is not centromeric and it is not nebulous. sent4: the kishke does style banter if it is not a towline. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does style banter is correct then it is flimsy. sent6: if the kishke does style banter then it is disposable. sent7: something synthesizes swan and is macrencephalic if the fact that it is not a netting is true. sent8: if the propyl is not disposable then it is flimsy. sent9: everything spangs Jenner. sent10: if something does spang Jenner then it is not mesoblastic and it is not a netting. sent11: the hemophiliac is not a kind of a disposable if the fact that the kishke is not flimsy and is a towline is false. sent12: the propyl is flimsy. sent13: if the kishke does not style banter and is not a disposable then the propyl is not a towline. sent14: the currant is not flimsy. sent15: the propyl is not a towline if the kishke does not style banter and is disposable. sent16: something is not a halfback and it does not style banter if it is not a disposable. sent17: the propyl is a towline and flimsy. sent18: the propyl is not a kind of a towline if the kishke does not style banter and it is non-flimsy. sent19: the fact that the kishke does not style banter is not incorrect if the propyl is not a kind of a towline and it is not a disposable. sent20: if there is something such that it does synthesize swan then the fact that the kishke is not flimsy but a towline is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kishke does not style banter.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the kishke is not disposable.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the kishke does not style banter and is not disposable.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the propyl is not a towline.; sent17 -> int3: the propyl is a kind of a towline.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the kishke is a kind of a disposable.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the kishke is a disposable if the fact that it does not style banter hold.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the hemophiliac is not a halfback and does not style banter.
sent16 -> int7: if the hemophiliac is not a kind of a disposable it is not a kind of a halfback and does not style banter.; sent7 -> int8: if the propyl is not a kind of a netting it synthesizes swan and is macrencephalic.; sent10 -> int9: if the swan spangs Jenner it is both not mesoblastic and not netting.; sent9 -> int10: the swan spangs Jenner.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the swan is not mesoblastic and not a netting.; int11 -> int12: everything is both not mesoblastic and non-netting.; int12 -> int13: the propyl is not mesoblastic and is not a netting.; int13 -> int14: the fact that the propyl does not net is not incorrect.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the propyl does synthesize swan and is not non-macrencephalic.; int15 -> int16: the propyl does synthesize swan.; int16 -> int17: something does synthesize swan.; sent20 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the kishke is not flimsy but it is a towline does not hold.; sent11 & int18 -> int19: that the hemophiliac is not a disposable is right.; int7 & int19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not style banter then the fact that it is a disposable is not false is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the propyl is not a towline if the kishke does style banter and is not disposable. sent2: the span is a sharp that is a page. sent3: the propyl is not centromeric and it is not nebulous. sent4: the kishke does style banter if it is not a towline. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does style banter is correct then it is flimsy. sent6: if the kishke does style banter then it is disposable. sent7: something synthesizes swan and is macrencephalic if the fact that it is not a netting is true. sent8: if the propyl is not disposable then it is flimsy. sent9: everything spangs Jenner. sent10: if something does spang Jenner then it is not mesoblastic and it is not a netting. sent11: the hemophiliac is not a kind of a disposable if the fact that the kishke is not flimsy and is a towline is false. sent12: the propyl is flimsy. sent13: if the kishke does not style banter and is not a disposable then the propyl is not a towline. sent14: the currant is not flimsy. sent15: the propyl is not a towline if the kishke does not style banter and is disposable. sent16: something is not a halfback and it does not style banter if it is not a disposable. sent17: the propyl is a towline and flimsy. sent18: the propyl is not a kind of a towline if the kishke does not style banter and it is non-flimsy. sent19: the fact that the kishke does not style banter is not incorrect if the propyl is not a kind of a towline and it is not a disposable. sent20: if there is something such that it does synthesize swan then the fact that the kishke is not flimsy but a towline is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the kishke does not style banter.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the kishke is not disposable.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the kishke does not style banter and is not disposable.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the propyl is not a towline.; sent17 -> int3: the propyl is a kind of a towline.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the kishke is a kind of a disposable.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the kishke is a disposable if the fact that it does not style banter hold.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__