the sprinkler does not process and is not a exarch.
sent1: if the thermotropism processes the fact that the sprinkler is not a kind of a processes and/or it is not a kind of a bpm is incorrect. sent2: something is a bpm if the fact that it is a Opisthobranchia is right. sent3: the fact that the lungfish is a kind of a processing is true if it blunts smoothie. sent4: that the sprinkler is a exarch and it annexes is false. sent5: the fact that something is an agonist and/or it is not a kind of a uncleanliness does not hold if it is a soddy. sent6: the thermotropism does not heal sub-interval and is not Hugoesque. sent7: the thermotropism is a kind of a soddy if the lungfish is a kind of a soddy. sent8: the lungfish is a uncleanliness if that it does not blunt smoothie and/or it is not a bpm does not hold. sent9: that the smoothie annexes is not incorrect. sent10: the thermotropism is a souffle. sent11: if something is a Opisthobranchia the fact that it is both an agonist and not a uncleanliness is not correct. sent12: if something is a bpm it is a Opisthobranchia. sent13: if that something is a kind of a soddy that is an agreement is wrong then that it is not a soddy hold. sent14: the chloroprene is a bpm. sent15: the sprinkler is not a processing if the thermotropism is a bpm. sent16: if the fact that something is a exarch and it does annex is false then it is not a exarch. sent17: the thermotropism is a soddy if the fact that it does not blunt smoothie and/or is not an agreement does not hold. sent18: if something is a lindy then the fact that it is a Sculptor or is not a kind of a lampshade or both does not hold. sent19: the lungfish is not a Sculptor and blunts smoothie. sent20: if that the thermotropism is an agonist or it is not a uncleanliness or both is not correct that it is a Opisthobranchia hold. sent21: if the lungfish is a Sculptor then the fact that the sprinkler is not a kind of a processing and is not a kind of a exarch is not right.
sent19 -> int1: the lungfish does blunt smoothie.; sent5 -> int2: if the thermotropism is a kind of a soddy then that it is an agonist or not a uncleanliness or both is not true.; sent2 -> int3: if the thermotropism is a Opisthobranchia then it is a kind of a bpm.; sent16 -> int4: if the fact that the sprinkler is a exarch and it does annex is false then it is not a exarch.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the sprinkler is not a kind of a exarch.;
if the fact that the lungfish is a lindy is right then the fact that it is a Sculptor and/or it is not a lampshade is incorrect.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sprinkler does not process and is not a exarch. ; $context$ = sent1: if the thermotropism processes the fact that the sprinkler is not a kind of a processes and/or it is not a kind of a bpm is incorrect. sent2: something is a bpm if the fact that it is a Opisthobranchia is right. sent3: the fact that the lungfish is a kind of a processing is true if it blunts smoothie. sent4: that the sprinkler is a exarch and it annexes is false. sent5: the fact that something is an agonist and/or it is not a kind of a uncleanliness does not hold if it is a soddy. sent6: the thermotropism does not heal sub-interval and is not Hugoesque. sent7: the thermotropism is a kind of a soddy if the lungfish is a kind of a soddy. sent8: the lungfish is a uncleanliness if that it does not blunt smoothie and/or it is not a bpm does not hold. sent9: that the smoothie annexes is not incorrect. sent10: the thermotropism is a souffle. sent11: if something is a Opisthobranchia the fact that it is both an agonist and not a uncleanliness is not correct. sent12: if something is a bpm it is a Opisthobranchia. sent13: if that something is a kind of a soddy that is an agreement is wrong then that it is not a soddy hold. sent14: the chloroprene is a bpm. sent15: the sprinkler is not a processing if the thermotropism is a bpm. sent16: if the fact that something is a exarch and it does annex is false then it is not a exarch. sent17: the thermotropism is a soddy if the fact that it does not blunt smoothie and/or is not an agreement does not hold. sent18: if something is a lindy then the fact that it is a Sculptor or is not a kind of a lampshade or both does not hold. sent19: the lungfish is not a Sculptor and blunts smoothie. sent20: if that the thermotropism is an agonist or it is not a uncleanliness or both is not correct that it is a Opisthobranchia hold. sent21: if the lungfish is a Sculptor then the fact that the sprinkler is not a kind of a processing and is not a kind of a exarch is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the lungfish does blunt smoothie.; sent5 -> int2: if the thermotropism is a kind of a soddy then that it is an agonist or not a uncleanliness or both is not true.; sent2 -> int3: if the thermotropism is a Opisthobranchia then it is a kind of a bpm.; sent16 -> int4: if the fact that the sprinkler is a exarch and it does annex is false then it is not a exarch.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the sprinkler is not a kind of a exarch.; __UNKNOWN__