that the gadoid is both a Ahriman and Jewish hold.
sent1: if the lichen demolishes and fiddles then the phosphatase does not demolishes. sent2: the sommelier does not uncoil nucleoplasm if the hauberk is not a pneumatophore. sent3: the hauberk does not upload jesting. sent4: something does not demolish if that it is non-phylogenetic and it does pink does not hold. sent5: if the hauberk does not demolish then the gadoid is a Ahriman. sent6: the hauberk does pink. sent7: the gadoid is a kind of a Ahriman. sent8: the gadoid is both a Ahriman and Jewish if the hauberk does not demolish. sent9: the gadoid does not uncoil nucleoplasm if the sommelier does not uncoil nucleoplasm but it is a pneumatophore. sent10: if something does not uncoil nucleoplasm then that it is a Ahriman that is Jewish is not correct. sent11: the sommelier uploads jesting if the phosphatase does not fiddle and it does not uploads jesting. sent12: the sommelier uploads jesting if the phosphatase does not fiddle and uploads jesting. sent13: the phosphatase does not upload jesting if there is something such that it does not ferment storyteller. sent14: something that is non-phylogenetic and a pink is not a pneumatophore. sent15: if the hauberk is not a pink it does not demolish. sent16: if something does not pink it does not demolish. sent17: that the gadoid does not upload jesting but it is a kind of a Ahriman is not right. sent18: there is something such that it does not ferment storyteller. sent19: that the sommelier does not upload jesting but it is a pneumatophore is incorrect. sent20: if something does upload jesting it does uncoil nucleoplasm. sent21: the phosphatase does not upload jesting. sent22: if the enlarger does not upload jesting then the lichen does demolish and it fiddles. sent23: something does not upload jesting if that it ferments storyteller and does harangue Pamlico does not hold. sent24: there is something such that it ferments storyteller. sent25: if there is something such that it does not ferment storyteller the phosphatase does not fiddle and does not upload jesting.
sent14 -> int1: the hauberk is not a kind of a pneumatophore if that it is a kind of non-phylogenetic thing that is a pink hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hauberk is not phylogenetic but it pinks.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hauberk is not a pneumatophore.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the sommelier does not uncoil nucleoplasm.; sent20 -> int4: the sommelier does uncoil nucleoplasm if it uploads jesting.; sent18 & sent25 -> int5: the phosphatase does not fiddle and it does not upload jesting.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the sommelier uploads jesting is not false.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the sommelier uncoils nucleoplasm.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the hauberk is not phylogenetic but it pinks does not hold.; sent4 -> int10: if the fact that the hauberk is not phylogenetic but it does pink is incorrect then it does not demolish.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the hauberk does not demolish.; int11 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the gadoid is a Ahriman and it is Jewish is not true.
sent10 -> int12: if the gadoid does not uncoil nucleoplasm that it is a kind of a Ahriman that is Jewish is wrong.; sent23 -> int13: the enlarger does not upload jesting if the fact that it ferments storyteller and harangues Pamlico is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the gadoid is both a Ahriman and Jewish hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lichen demolishes and fiddles then the phosphatase does not demolishes. sent2: the sommelier does not uncoil nucleoplasm if the hauberk is not a pneumatophore. sent3: the hauberk does not upload jesting. sent4: something does not demolish if that it is non-phylogenetic and it does pink does not hold. sent5: if the hauberk does not demolish then the gadoid is a Ahriman. sent6: the hauberk does pink. sent7: the gadoid is a kind of a Ahriman. sent8: the gadoid is both a Ahriman and Jewish if the hauberk does not demolish. sent9: the gadoid does not uncoil nucleoplasm if the sommelier does not uncoil nucleoplasm but it is a pneumatophore. sent10: if something does not uncoil nucleoplasm then that it is a Ahriman that is Jewish is not correct. sent11: the sommelier uploads jesting if the phosphatase does not fiddle and it does not uploads jesting. sent12: the sommelier uploads jesting if the phosphatase does not fiddle and uploads jesting. sent13: the phosphatase does not upload jesting if there is something such that it does not ferment storyteller. sent14: something that is non-phylogenetic and a pink is not a pneumatophore. sent15: if the hauberk is not a pink it does not demolish. sent16: if something does not pink it does not demolish. sent17: that the gadoid does not upload jesting but it is a kind of a Ahriman is not right. sent18: there is something such that it does not ferment storyteller. sent19: that the sommelier does not upload jesting but it is a pneumatophore is incorrect. sent20: if something does upload jesting it does uncoil nucleoplasm. sent21: the phosphatase does not upload jesting. sent22: if the enlarger does not upload jesting then the lichen does demolish and it fiddles. sent23: something does not upload jesting if that it ferments storyteller and does harangue Pamlico does not hold. sent24: there is something such that it ferments storyteller. sent25: if there is something such that it does not ferment storyteller the phosphatase does not fiddle and does not upload jesting. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the hauberk is not a kind of a pneumatophore if that it is a kind of non-phylogenetic thing that is a pink hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hauberk is not phylogenetic but it pinks.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the hauberk is not a pneumatophore.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the sommelier does not uncoil nucleoplasm.; sent20 -> int4: the sommelier does uncoil nucleoplasm if it uploads jesting.; sent18 & sent25 -> int5: the phosphatase does not fiddle and it does not upload jesting.; sent11 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the sommelier uploads jesting is not false.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the sommelier uncoils nucleoplasm.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the hauberk is not phylogenetic but it pinks does not hold.; sent4 -> int10: if the fact that the hauberk is not phylogenetic but it does pink is incorrect then it does not demolish.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the hauberk does not demolish.; int11 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__