the halftone is not a kind of a spray.
sent1: if the axil is a decree then that the anticholinergic is a kind of a unsanitariness is correct. sent2: that if the anticholinergic is a decree then the fact that the axil is a unsanitariness is true is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that it decrees. sent4: if the madder decrees the axil is not a kind of a spray but it is perceptive. sent5: that the madder is not perceptive is not false. sent6: if something that does not zero is a spray then the axil is not perceptive. sent7: the anticholinergic is a kind of a unsanitariness if the axil is a zero. sent8: if a unperceptive thing mills then the halftone is not a spray. sent9: something is sensorimotor. sent10: the madder is a decree if it is a unsanitariness. sent11: something is a unsanitariness and it zeroes. sent12: the halftone is a kind of non-zero thing that appropriates Lofortyx. sent13: the madder is not perceptive but it is a mill if the anticholinergic is a unsanitariness. sent14: there exists something such that that it is perceptive thing that is not a kind of a unsanitariness does not hold. sent15: the halftone is not a kind of a decree. sent16: there exists something such that it is a decree and a unsanitariness. sent17: the axil is zero or a decree or both.
sent17 & sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the anticholinergic is a unsanitariness.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the madder is not perceptive but it mills.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of non-perceptive thing that does mill.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
something is not a kind of an airline but it appropriates cytology.
$hypothesis$ = the halftone is not a kind of a spray. ; $context$ = sent1: if the axil is a decree then that the anticholinergic is a kind of a unsanitariness is correct. sent2: that if the anticholinergic is a decree then the fact that the axil is a unsanitariness is true is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that it decrees. sent4: if the madder decrees the axil is not a kind of a spray but it is perceptive. sent5: that the madder is not perceptive is not false. sent6: if something that does not zero is a spray then the axil is not perceptive. sent7: the anticholinergic is a kind of a unsanitariness if the axil is a zero. sent8: if a unperceptive thing mills then the halftone is not a spray. sent9: something is sensorimotor. sent10: the madder is a decree if it is a unsanitariness. sent11: something is a unsanitariness and it zeroes. sent12: the halftone is a kind of non-zero thing that appropriates Lofortyx. sent13: the madder is not perceptive but it is a mill if the anticholinergic is a unsanitariness. sent14: there exists something such that that it is perceptive thing that is not a kind of a unsanitariness does not hold. sent15: the halftone is not a kind of a decree. sent16: there exists something such that it is a decree and a unsanitariness. sent17: the axil is zero or a decree or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent7 & sent1 -> int1: the anticholinergic is a unsanitariness.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the madder is not perceptive but it mills.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a kind of non-perceptive thing that does mill.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__