if the enhancement does not occur then both the Ceyloneseness and the access happens.
sent1: the fact that that not the mandate but the staggering ponycart happens does not hold is correct. sent2: the Ceyloneseness happens and the access occurs if the enhancement happens. sent3: if the enhancement happens that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is not right. sent4: that the impotentness does not occur and the access does not occur does not hold if the inflectionalness happens. sent5: if that the impotentness does not occur and the accessing does not occur does not hold the fact that the accessing happens is right. sent6: if the enhancement does not occur the fact that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the undomesticness happens. sent8: if the Ceyloneseness does not occur then the fact that the access but not the pleochroism occurs is not true. sent9: if the staggering glossy occurs the fact that the unpleasantness does not occur and the failing Polygonum does not occur is wrong. sent10: if that the Ceyloneseness happens and the permutation happens does not hold the Ceyloneseness does not occur. sent11: that the Ceyloneseness occurs hold if the fact that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is not correct. sent12: the inflectionalness does not occur and the leisure does not occur if the batching centralism does not occur. sent13: the fact that the failing ascomycete does not occur but the Burmese occurs does not hold. sent14: that both the non-sternutatoriness and the staggering pedestrian happens is wrong if the enhancement does not occur. sent15: the inflectionalness happens. sent16: that the sternutatoriness but not the staggering pedestrian occurs is not right. sent17: the postbiblicalness prevents that the impotentness occurs. sent18: the apostasy does not occur. sent19: if the barring Lippizan occurs then that the failing ascomycete does not occur and the barring Methuselah does not occur is not true. sent20: if either the bromicness does not occur or the screening occurs or both then the batching centralism does not occur. sent21: if that the accessing but not the pleochroism occurs is incorrect the pleochroism occurs. sent22: either the postbiblicalness occurs or the Moorishness does not occur or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enhancement does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Ceyloneseness happens.; sent4 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the impotentness does not occur and the accessing does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the accessing occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the Ceyloneseness and the access happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the pleochroism occurs and the anticoagulation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the enhancement does not occur then both the Ceyloneseness and the access happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that not the mandate but the staggering ponycart happens does not hold is correct. sent2: the Ceyloneseness happens and the access occurs if the enhancement happens. sent3: if the enhancement happens that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is not right. sent4: that the impotentness does not occur and the access does not occur does not hold if the inflectionalness happens. sent5: if that the impotentness does not occur and the accessing does not occur does not hold the fact that the accessing happens is right. sent6: if the enhancement does not occur the fact that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is incorrect. sent7: the undomesticness happens. sent8: if the Ceyloneseness does not occur then the fact that the access but not the pleochroism occurs is not true. sent9: if the staggering glossy occurs the fact that the unpleasantness does not occur and the failing Polygonum does not occur is wrong. sent10: if that the Ceyloneseness happens and the permutation happens does not hold the Ceyloneseness does not occur. sent11: that the Ceyloneseness occurs hold if the fact that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is not correct. sent12: the inflectionalness does not occur and the leisure does not occur if the batching centralism does not occur. sent13: the fact that the failing ascomycete does not occur but the Burmese occurs does not hold. sent14: that both the non-sternutatoriness and the staggering pedestrian happens is wrong if the enhancement does not occur. sent15: the inflectionalness happens. sent16: that the sternutatoriness but not the staggering pedestrian occurs is not right. sent17: the postbiblicalness prevents that the impotentness occurs. sent18: the apostasy does not occur. sent19: if the barring Lippizan occurs then that the failing ascomycete does not occur and the barring Methuselah does not occur is not true. sent20: if either the bromicness does not occur or the screening occurs or both then the batching centralism does not occur. sent21: if that the accessing but not the pleochroism occurs is incorrect the pleochroism occurs. sent22: either the postbiblicalness occurs or the Moorishness does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enhancement does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sternutatoriness does not occur and the staggering pedestrian does not occur is incorrect.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Ceyloneseness happens.; sent4 & sent15 -> int3: the fact that the impotentness does not occur and the accessing does not occur does not hold.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the accessing occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the Ceyloneseness and the access happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__