the fact that there is something such that if it hardens nerves and it does restart scraping then it is not chiasmal is not correct.
sent1: the janitor is chiasmal if it hardens nerves and restarts scraping. sent2: there exists something such that if it does include pessimism and it does whack it girdles. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Nauruan and it is a kind of a makeweight that it hardens janitor is correct. sent4: something is not menopausal if it is alkylic and is a letterpress. sent5: that the janitor is not wifely is not wrong if it is a kind of nonwashable thing that does restart scraping. sent6: the fact that if something is multidimensional and it is not non-paleoanthropological it is not estrogenic hold. sent7: if the stockinet is Arawakan and passive then it is not chiasmal. sent8: there is something such that if it is disorderly and it is a kind of a subscription it is not a stipendiary. sent9: there exists something such that if it hardens nerves and it restarts scraping it is chiasmal. sent10: there is something such that if it hardens blowtorch and is a Saccharum then it is menopausal. sent11: the janitor is not chiasmal if it hardens nerves and does restart scraping.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is multidimensional and it is paleoanthropological that it is not estrogenic hold.
sent6 -> int1: that the anthologist is not estrogenic is not wrong if it is multidimensional and paleoanthropological.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it hardens nerves and it does restart scraping then it is not chiasmal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the janitor is chiasmal if it hardens nerves and restarts scraping. sent2: there exists something such that if it does include pessimism and it does whack it girdles. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Nauruan and it is a kind of a makeweight that it hardens janitor is correct. sent4: something is not menopausal if it is alkylic and is a letterpress. sent5: that the janitor is not wifely is not wrong if it is a kind of nonwashable thing that does restart scraping. sent6: the fact that if something is multidimensional and it is not non-paleoanthropological it is not estrogenic hold. sent7: if the stockinet is Arawakan and passive then it is not chiasmal. sent8: there is something such that if it is disorderly and it is a kind of a subscription it is not a stipendiary. sent9: there exists something such that if it hardens nerves and it restarts scraping it is chiasmal. sent10: there is something such that if it hardens blowtorch and is a Saccharum then it is menopausal. sent11: the janitor is not chiasmal if it hardens nerves and does restart scraping. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__