the fact that both the non-unconstitutionalness and the non-Venezuelanness happens is false.
sent1: the tonsillectomy does not occur if the fact that the tonsillectomy but not the ditch occurs is incorrect. sent2: the presidentialness is caused by that the nomination does not occur. sent3: that the de-escalation does not occur is prevented by either that the de-escalation happens or that the nomination does not occur or both. sent4: that the nomination does not occur is caused by that both the non-unconstitutionalness and the non-Venezuelanness occurs. sent5: if the recognition does not occur then the de-escalation occurs or the nomination does not occur or both. sent6: that the deviating interaction occurs and the puncturableness does not occur does not hold. sent7: the unpresidentialness happens and the rioting mandarin happens if the tonsillectomy does not occur. sent8: both the unpresidentialness and the recognition occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-unconstitutionalness and the non-Venezuelanness happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the nomination does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the unpresidentialness does not occur.; sent8 -> int3: the unpresidentialness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rioting mandarin and the de-escalation happens is right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the non-unconstitutionalness and the non-Venezuelanness happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the tonsillectomy does not occur if the fact that the tonsillectomy but not the ditch occurs is incorrect. sent2: the presidentialness is caused by that the nomination does not occur. sent3: that the de-escalation does not occur is prevented by either that the de-escalation happens or that the nomination does not occur or both. sent4: that the nomination does not occur is caused by that both the non-unconstitutionalness and the non-Venezuelanness occurs. sent5: if the recognition does not occur then the de-escalation occurs or the nomination does not occur or both. sent6: that the deviating interaction occurs and the puncturableness does not occur does not hold. sent7: the unpresidentialness happens and the rioting mandarin happens if the tonsillectomy does not occur. sent8: both the unpresidentialness and the recognition occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the non-unconstitutionalness and the non-Venezuelanness happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the nomination does not occur.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the unpresidentialness does not occur.; sent8 -> int3: the unpresidentialness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__