the Victorian is both a Freon and a Cepheus.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a synovia the fact that it is not a kind of a potter and it is not a kind of a fetology is incorrect. sent2: the Victorian is a Freon and is a kind of a Cepheus if the declinometer is not a Cepheus. sent3: something does rake valvule. sent4: if that the declinometer is a Ceratophyllum that is a synovia does not hold then the nameko is not a synovia. sent5: the massicot is not a Ceratophyllum if that the Pilsner does not rake lawrencium and/or does begin Samoyedic is not correct. sent6: if the mopper is not postganglionic the fact that either the Pilsner does not rake lawrencium or it does begin Samoyedic or both does not hold. sent7: something does not begin TSS and it does not rake massicot if it is not a kind of a confederation. sent8: the Victorian is not a kind of a confederation if the fact that the nameko is not a potter and not a fetology is not right. sent9: the fact that the nameko does begin TSS and it does rake massicot does not hold if the fact that something rakes valvule is not incorrect. sent10: if something does not begin TSS and does not rake massicot it does not rake valvule. sent11: the mopper is not postganglionic. sent12: if that the declinometer does not begin TSS and/or it does not rake valvule is wrong the nameko is factual. sent13: that something is a kind of a Freon that is a Cepheus does not hold if it does not rake valvule. sent14: the declinometer is not a Cepheus if the fact that the nameko does not begin TSS is right. sent15: the fact that the declinometer is not a kind of a Cepheus is correct if that the nameko begins TSS and it does rake massicot is not right.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: that the nameko begins TSS and rakes massicot is not right.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the declinometer is not a Cepheus.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the Victorian is a Freon and is a kind of a Cepheus is wrong.
sent13 -> int3: if the Victorian does not rake valvule then that it is a kind of a Freon and it is a Cepheus is not correct.; sent10 -> int4: if the Victorian does not begin TSS and it does not rake massicot it does not rake valvule.; sent7 -> int5: if the Victorian is not a confederation then it does not begin TSS and does not rake massicot.; sent1 -> int6: the fact that the nameko is not a kind of a potter and it is not a fetology is false if it is not a kind of a synovia.; sent6 & sent11 -> int7: that either the Pilsner does not rake lawrencium or it begins Samoyedic or both is wrong.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the massicot is not a Ceratophyllum.; int8 -> int9: something is not a kind of a Ceratophyllum.;
$hypothesis$ = the Victorian is both a Freon and a Cepheus. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a synovia the fact that it is not a kind of a potter and it is not a kind of a fetology is incorrect. sent2: the Victorian is a Freon and is a kind of a Cepheus if the declinometer is not a Cepheus. sent3: something does rake valvule. sent4: if that the declinometer is a Ceratophyllum that is a synovia does not hold then the nameko is not a synovia. sent5: the massicot is not a Ceratophyllum if that the Pilsner does not rake lawrencium and/or does begin Samoyedic is not correct. sent6: if the mopper is not postganglionic the fact that either the Pilsner does not rake lawrencium or it does begin Samoyedic or both does not hold. sent7: something does not begin TSS and it does not rake massicot if it is not a kind of a confederation. sent8: the Victorian is not a kind of a confederation if the fact that the nameko is not a potter and not a fetology is not right. sent9: the fact that the nameko does begin TSS and it does rake massicot does not hold if the fact that something rakes valvule is not incorrect. sent10: if something does not begin TSS and does not rake massicot it does not rake valvule. sent11: the mopper is not postganglionic. sent12: if that the declinometer does not begin TSS and/or it does not rake valvule is wrong the nameko is factual. sent13: that something is a kind of a Freon that is a Cepheus does not hold if it does not rake valvule. sent14: the declinometer is not a Cepheus if the fact that the nameko does not begin TSS is right. sent15: the fact that the declinometer is not a kind of a Cepheus is correct if that the nameko begins TSS and it does rake massicot is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: that the nameko begins TSS and rakes massicot is not right.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the declinometer is not a Cepheus.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__