the nonoperationalness happens and the occidentalizing Hippocampus happens.
sent1: the technophilicness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the horripilating wariness and the non-availableness occurs is not correct if the technophilicness does not occur. sent3: the bankruptcy does not occur. sent4: if the bankruptcy does not occur then the fact that the occidentalizing Hippocampus happens hold. sent5: if the communion occurs the horripilating follow-through occurs. sent6: if the technophilicness happens then that the similarness does not occur is not wrong. sent7: that the horripilating wariness happens and the availableness occurs is false. sent8: that not the allometricness but the elementariness occurs is caused by that the naturisticness does not occur. sent9: the operculateness is prevented by the fact that that the allometricness does not occur but the elementariness happens is not wrong. sent10: the occidentalizing sophisticated happens but the naturisticness does not occur if the Beguine does not occur. sent11: the submersible but not the horripilating tweeter happens if the repositing banana happens. sent12: if that the horripilating wariness but not the availableness happens does not hold then the nonoperationalness happens. sent13: if the submersibleness happens the Beguine does not occur and the pastaness occurs. sent14: the occidentalizing Hippocampus happens and the bankruptcy does not occur if the operculateness does not occur.
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: that the horripilating wariness and the non-availableness occurs is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the nonoperationalness happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the occidentalizing Hippocampus occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the similarness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the nonoperationalness happens and the occidentalizing Hippocampus happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the technophilicness does not occur. sent2: the fact that both the horripilating wariness and the non-availableness occurs is not correct if the technophilicness does not occur. sent3: the bankruptcy does not occur. sent4: if the bankruptcy does not occur then the fact that the occidentalizing Hippocampus happens hold. sent5: if the communion occurs the horripilating follow-through occurs. sent6: if the technophilicness happens then that the similarness does not occur is not wrong. sent7: that the horripilating wariness happens and the availableness occurs is false. sent8: that not the allometricness but the elementariness occurs is caused by that the naturisticness does not occur. sent9: the operculateness is prevented by the fact that that the allometricness does not occur but the elementariness happens is not wrong. sent10: the occidentalizing sophisticated happens but the naturisticness does not occur if the Beguine does not occur. sent11: the submersible but not the horripilating tweeter happens if the repositing banana happens. sent12: if that the horripilating wariness but not the availableness happens does not hold then the nonoperationalness happens. sent13: if the submersibleness happens the Beguine does not occur and the pastaness occurs. sent14: the occidentalizing Hippocampus happens and the bankruptcy does not occur if the operculateness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent1 -> int1: that the horripilating wariness and the non-availableness occurs is wrong.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the nonoperationalness happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int3: the occidentalizing Hippocampus occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__