the carabao consorts lander.
sent1: the backstitch is not hydroelectric. sent2: The protectionism does not clank Ephesian. sent3: if the voucher is not destructive then the halal clanks verbalization and/or it is a Perca. sent4: the Ephesian does not clank protectionism. sent5: if the backstitch is not hydroelectric that it is meiotic and does clank protectionism is incorrect. sent6: everything is not politics and is not a maturity. sent7: if the Ephesian is not meiotic then the backstitch does not clank protectionism. sent8: something consorts lander if it does consort bunco. sent9: the fact that the carabao does consort bunco and it travesties up-tick is false if the backstitch travesties up-tick. sent10: if the backstitch does not travesty up-tick then the Ephesian is both not a martensite and a Ulaanbaatar. sent11: the swatch does not clank protectionism if that there exists something such that that it is meiotic and clank protectionism does not hold is right. sent12: that the fact that the Ephesian is a martensite and it is a Ulaanbaatar is wrong is not incorrect. sent13: if that something does not consort bunco and does travesty up-tick is not correct it does consort lander. sent14: that the carabao does not consort bunco but it travesties up-tick is wrong if the backstitch travesties up-tick. sent15: the fact that the carabao does consort bunco and travesties up-tick does not hold. sent16: the carabao consorts lander if it consorts bunco. sent17: the brogan is not hydroelectric if the halal is a Perca. sent18: the brogan is not hydroelectric if the halal clanks verbalization. sent19: the Ephesian is not a martensite. sent20: if the backstitch does not travesty up-tick the Ephesian is not a martensite. sent21: if the fact that the voucher does jockey phenomenon and is destructive is not right that it is not destructive is right. sent22: the fact that the Ephesian is a martensite and it is a Ulaanbaatar is not correct if it does not clank protectionism. sent23: if the brogan is not hydroelectric the fact that the Ephesian is meiotic thing that is not non-electronic is incorrect. sent24: the fact that something does jockey phenomenon and it is destructive is not right if it is not politics. sent25: if that something is meiotic and is electronic is false then the fact that it is not meiotic is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backstitch does not travesty up-tick.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Ephesian is not a martensite but it is a Ulaanbaatar.; sent13 -> int2: if that the carabao does not consort bunco but it travesties up-tick is not true it does consort lander.;
the carabao does not consort lander.
sent25 -> int3: the Ephesian is not meiotic if the fact that it is a kind of meiotic thing that is electronic is not correct.; sent6 -> int4: the lander is not politics and not a maturity.; int4 -> int5: the lander is not politics.; int5 -> int6: everything is not politics.; int6 -> int7: the prod is not politics.; sent24 -> int8: the fact that the prod does jockey phenomenon and is destructive is wrong if it is not politics.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the prod jockeys phenomenon and it is destructive is wrong.; int9 -> int10: the fact that there is nothing such that it jockeys phenomenon and is destructive is correct.; int10 -> int11: the fact that the fact that the voucher does jockey phenomenon and it is destructive does not hold is true.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the voucher is not destructive.; int12 & sent3 -> int13: the halal does clank verbalization and/or it is a Perca.; sent18 & sent17 & int13 -> int14: the brogan is non-hydroelectric.; int14 & sent23 -> int15: that the Ephesian is meiotic and it is electronic does not hold.; int3 & int15 -> int16: the Ephesian is not meiotic.; int16 & sent7 -> int17: the backstitch does not clank protectionism.; int17 -> int18: something does not clank protectionism.;
$hypothesis$ = the carabao consorts lander. ; $context$ = sent1: the backstitch is not hydroelectric. sent2: The protectionism does not clank Ephesian. sent3: if the voucher is not destructive then the halal clanks verbalization and/or it is a Perca. sent4: the Ephesian does not clank protectionism. sent5: if the backstitch is not hydroelectric that it is meiotic and does clank protectionism is incorrect. sent6: everything is not politics and is not a maturity. sent7: if the Ephesian is not meiotic then the backstitch does not clank protectionism. sent8: something consorts lander if it does consort bunco. sent9: the fact that the carabao does consort bunco and it travesties up-tick is false if the backstitch travesties up-tick. sent10: if the backstitch does not travesty up-tick then the Ephesian is both not a martensite and a Ulaanbaatar. sent11: the swatch does not clank protectionism if that there exists something such that that it is meiotic and clank protectionism does not hold is right. sent12: that the fact that the Ephesian is a martensite and it is a Ulaanbaatar is wrong is not incorrect. sent13: if that something does not consort bunco and does travesty up-tick is not correct it does consort lander. sent14: that the carabao does not consort bunco but it travesties up-tick is wrong if the backstitch travesties up-tick. sent15: the fact that the carabao does consort bunco and travesties up-tick does not hold. sent16: the carabao consorts lander if it consorts bunco. sent17: the brogan is not hydroelectric if the halal is a Perca. sent18: the brogan is not hydroelectric if the halal clanks verbalization. sent19: the Ephesian is not a martensite. sent20: if the backstitch does not travesty up-tick the Ephesian is not a martensite. sent21: if the fact that the voucher does jockey phenomenon and is destructive is not right that it is not destructive is right. sent22: the fact that the Ephesian is a martensite and it is a Ulaanbaatar is not correct if it does not clank protectionism. sent23: if the brogan is not hydroelectric the fact that the Ephesian is meiotic thing that is not non-electronic is incorrect. sent24: the fact that something does jockey phenomenon and it is destructive is not right if it is not politics. sent25: if that something is meiotic and is electronic is false then the fact that it is not meiotic is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the backstitch does not travesty up-tick.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Ephesian is not a martensite but it is a Ulaanbaatar.; sent13 -> int2: if that the carabao does not consort bunco but it travesties up-tick is not true it does consort lander.; __UNKNOWN__