there exists something such that if it is not a truancy then the fact that it is a pounce that does not deactivate featured is incorrect.
sent1: if the marzipan is not a truancy then that it is a pounce and it does not deactivate featured is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not an integral that it is a Hebei and it does not confederate Osmerus does not hold. sent3: if the marzipan does not declaw scorched that it is a kind of a Raphidae and it is not a kind of a meringue does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a truancy then that it does pounce and it does not deactivate featured is not right. sent5: that the marzipan is a circular but it is not a Munro is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Nuphar. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not Babylonian the fact that it is imprecise and is not foliate is incorrect. sent7: if the marzipan is not a truancy then it does pounce and it does not deactivate featured. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a truancy then the fact that it is a pounce and deactivates featured is not right. sent9: if something is not a taker then that it is a kind of a mixology and does not declaw compositor does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not Russian then the fact that it is a kind of a classics that does not deactivate mean does not hold. sent11: the fact that the marzipan is a pounce and it does deactivate featured is false if it is not a truancy. sent12: the fact that the marzipan is an irregular but not a pounce is wrong if it is not unwieldy. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not confederate seaborgium that it is agronomic thing that does not declaw mastiff is wrong. sent14: that the marzipan is a pounce that does not deactivate featured is wrong if it is a truancy. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a truancy then it does pounce and it does not deactivate featured.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not a kind of a taker then the fact that it is a mixology that does not declaw compositor does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: if the NSAID is not a taker then that it is a kind of a mixology and it does not declaw compositor is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a truancy then the fact that it is a pounce that does not deactivate featured is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marzipan is not a truancy then that it is a pounce and it does not deactivate featured is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not an integral that it is a Hebei and it does not confederate Osmerus does not hold. sent3: if the marzipan does not declaw scorched that it is a kind of a Raphidae and it is not a kind of a meringue does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a truancy then that it does pounce and it does not deactivate featured is not right. sent5: that the marzipan is a circular but it is not a Munro is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Nuphar. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not Babylonian the fact that it is imprecise and is not foliate is incorrect. sent7: if the marzipan is not a truancy then it does pounce and it does not deactivate featured. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a truancy then the fact that it is a pounce and deactivates featured is not right. sent9: if something is not a taker then that it is a kind of a mixology and does not declaw compositor does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not Russian then the fact that it is a kind of a classics that does not deactivate mean does not hold. sent11: the fact that the marzipan is a pounce and it does deactivate featured is false if it is not a truancy. sent12: the fact that the marzipan is an irregular but not a pounce is wrong if it is not unwieldy. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not confederate seaborgium that it is agronomic thing that does not declaw mastiff is wrong. sent14: that the marzipan is a pounce that does not deactivate featured is wrong if it is a truancy. sent15: there is something such that if it is not a truancy then it does pounce and it does not deactivate featured. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__