there is something such that if it is a kind of a Galbraith then it does not aspire and it does iron.
sent1: the recapitulation does not aspire if it is a Galbraith. sent2: there is something such that if it is a Galbraith then it aspires and it is an ironing. sent3: if something is a croft then it does mean climax. sent4: if the recapitulation is unworthy then it is maxi. sent5: a Galbraith does not aspire and irons. sent6: there is something such that if it does descend it is a cliff and it explodes. sent7: something is a Monocanthidae if it is a code. sent8: if the staff is abdominovesical then it is not a kind of a Galbraith and it is a packaging. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is an organist is not wrong it is both not interdepartmental and macerative. sent10: there exists something such that if it tortures garden then it is a bowling and infinitival. sent11: something does gong featured if it is arenaceous. sent12: if something is a rarebit then it is a Salix. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Galbraith is not incorrect it does not aspire. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a reconsideration it does not gong aleurone and it is ahistorical. sent15: there is something such that if it is a Galbraith it is an ironing. sent16: there is something such that if it poles transplant then it does celebrate and is a kind of an organist. sent17: if something is inshore it does not mean reincarnation and it is inauspicious. sent18: something is not a kind of a lanternfish but it means gnathostome if it is lobate.
sent5 -> int1: if the recapitulation is a Galbraith then it does not aspire and is an ironing.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is inshore hold then it does not mean reincarnation and is inauspicious.
sent17 -> int2: the reincarnation does not mean reincarnation and is inauspicious if it is inshore.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a Galbraith then it does not aspire and it does iron. ; $context$ = sent1: the recapitulation does not aspire if it is a Galbraith. sent2: there is something such that if it is a Galbraith then it aspires and it is an ironing. sent3: if something is a croft then it does mean climax. sent4: if the recapitulation is unworthy then it is maxi. sent5: a Galbraith does not aspire and irons. sent6: there is something such that if it does descend it is a cliff and it explodes. sent7: something is a Monocanthidae if it is a code. sent8: if the staff is abdominovesical then it is not a kind of a Galbraith and it is a packaging. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is an organist is not wrong it is both not interdepartmental and macerative. sent10: there exists something such that if it tortures garden then it is a bowling and infinitival. sent11: something does gong featured if it is arenaceous. sent12: if something is a rarebit then it is a Salix. sent13: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Galbraith is not incorrect it does not aspire. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a reconsideration it does not gong aleurone and it is ahistorical. sent15: there is something such that if it is a Galbraith it is an ironing. sent16: there is something such that if it poles transplant then it does celebrate and is a kind of an organist. sent17: if something is inshore it does not mean reincarnation and it is inauspicious. sent18: something is not a kind of a lanternfish but it means gnathostome if it is lobate. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the recapitulation is a Galbraith then it does not aspire and is an ironing.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__