the bomb occurs.
sent1: not the convenientness but the lahar happens. sent2: the snafuing does not occur and the psycholinguisticsness does not occur. sent3: the lahar does not occur if not the emoting caliph but the womanliness happens. sent4: that the bomb does not occur is prevented by that not the favorableness but the emoting signore occurs. sent5: the astrocyticness happens. sent6: that the favorableness happens results in that not the emoting caliph but the womanliness occurs. sent7: if the snafu does not occur and the psycholinguisticsness does not occur then the emoting signore occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the favorableness occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: not the emoting caliph but the womanliness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the lahar does not occur hold.; sent1 -> int3: the lahar happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the favorableness does not occur.; sent7 & sent2 -> int6: the emoting signore happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the favorableness does not occur and the emoting signore occurs.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the bomb occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: not the convenientness but the lahar happens. sent2: the snafuing does not occur and the psycholinguisticsness does not occur. sent3: the lahar does not occur if not the emoting caliph but the womanliness happens. sent4: that the bomb does not occur is prevented by that not the favorableness but the emoting signore occurs. sent5: the astrocyticness happens. sent6: that the favorableness happens results in that not the emoting caliph but the womanliness occurs. sent7: if the snafu does not occur and the psycholinguisticsness does not occur then the emoting signore occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the favorableness occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: not the emoting caliph but the womanliness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the lahar does not occur hold.; sent1 -> int3: the lahar happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the favorableness does not occur.; sent7 & sent2 -> int6: the emoting signore happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the favorableness does not occur and the emoting signore occurs.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__