the lip is monomorphemic.
sent1: That the butterscotch does not lather array hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is a matted. sent3: if the cybernaut is dominical it does denaturalize paddock. sent4: the wolverine is a kind of a bilges that is not monomorphemic. sent5: the lip is a trudge. sent6: the cybernaut lathers butterscotch if something does abound and is not a trudge. sent7: that the array does not lather butterscotch hold. sent8: if something lathers butterscotch it is a kind of a matted. sent9: there is something such that it is a matted and is dominical. sent10: the lip is not impressionable. sent11: if the array does not lather butterscotch the cybernaut is a trudge. sent12: if the array does not lather butterscotch the cybernaut is a kind of a matted and it is a trudge. sent13: if the array is not a trudge then the fact that the lip is both not a matted and dominical is not true. sent14: if the fact that something is not a matted but dominical is incorrect then it is not monomorphemic. sent15: the lip denaturalizes paddock and is not a oxyphencyclimine. sent16: the valley is developmental but it is not a matted. sent17: something is not a doorplate. sent18: the cybernaut is not monomorphemic. sent19: something denaturalizes paddock and does not abound if it is dominical. sent20: that the cybernaut does denaturalize paddock but it does not abound is not right. sent21: if something is a matted and not dominical the lip is monomorphemic.
sent19 -> int1: the cybernaut denaturalizes paddock but it does not abound if it is dominical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cybernaut is dominical is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cybernaut denaturalizes paddock and does not abound.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cybernaut is not dominical.; sent12 & sent7 -> int5: the cybernaut is a matted and it is a kind of a trudge.; int5 -> int6: the cybernaut is a matted.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the cybernaut is a kind of a matted that is not dominical.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a matted and not dominical is right.; int8 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the lip is not monomorphemic.
sent14 -> int9: if the fact that the lip is not a matted but dominical is not right it is not monomorphemic.;
$hypothesis$ = the lip is monomorphemic. ; $context$ = sent1: That the butterscotch does not lather array hold. sent2: there exists something such that it is a matted. sent3: if the cybernaut is dominical it does denaturalize paddock. sent4: the wolverine is a kind of a bilges that is not monomorphemic. sent5: the lip is a trudge. sent6: the cybernaut lathers butterscotch if something does abound and is not a trudge. sent7: that the array does not lather butterscotch hold. sent8: if something lathers butterscotch it is a kind of a matted. sent9: there is something such that it is a matted and is dominical. sent10: the lip is not impressionable. sent11: if the array does not lather butterscotch the cybernaut is a trudge. sent12: if the array does not lather butterscotch the cybernaut is a kind of a matted and it is a trudge. sent13: if the array is not a trudge then the fact that the lip is both not a matted and dominical is not true. sent14: if the fact that something is not a matted but dominical is incorrect then it is not monomorphemic. sent15: the lip denaturalizes paddock and is not a oxyphencyclimine. sent16: the valley is developmental but it is not a matted. sent17: something is not a doorplate. sent18: the cybernaut is not monomorphemic. sent19: something denaturalizes paddock and does not abound if it is dominical. sent20: that the cybernaut does denaturalize paddock but it does not abound is not right. sent21: if something is a matted and not dominical the lip is monomorphemic. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the cybernaut denaturalizes paddock but it does not abound if it is dominical.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cybernaut is dominical is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cybernaut denaturalizes paddock and does not abound.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cybernaut is not dominical.; sent12 & sent7 -> int5: the cybernaut is a matted and it is a kind of a trudge.; int5 -> int6: the cybernaut is a matted.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the cybernaut is a kind of a matted that is not dominical.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it is a matted and not dominical is right.; int8 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__