there is something such that if that it is a Abukir and it is not a birdcall is wrong then it does lysogenize monohydrate.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is a persuader and it is not a noise is wrong then it does subrogate undulation. sent2: if that the gook is a birdcall but it is not a Latinesce is incorrect then it is doric. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it does encore and it is not a kind of a multivitamin is not correct then it is felicitous. sent4: the gook is wireless if the fact that it is likable and it is not a birdcall is not correct. sent5: if the fact that something does lysogenize monohydrate but it is not a rhumba is not correct it is rheologic. sent6: the gook lysogenizes monohydrate if it is a Abukir and is not a birdcall. sent7: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it rehashes and it is not a kind of an exit is incorrect then it is a ballistocardiograph is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is entomophilous and it is not anencephalic is not true it is a Latinesce. sent9: the shaver is a kind of a squeegee if the fact that it does desquamate and it does not besot Microsporum does not hold. sent10: that there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a wireless and is not cryptogamic does not hold then that it is a material is not wrong hold. sent11: the impeller is a behalf if that it does lysogenize monohydrate and it does not lysogenize thermopile is not true. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a birdcall then it does lysogenize monohydrate. sent13: the gook does lysogenize monohydrate if that it is both a Abukir and not a birdcall does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is a Abukir and it is not a birdcall then it does lysogenize monohydrate. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is cacodemonic and it is not a toilet does not hold it is not non-symbolic. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Abukir and is a birdcall is not correct then it does lysogenize monohydrate. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Abukir then it lysogenizes monohydrate. sent18: if the gook is a kind of a birdcall it lysogenizes monohydrate.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the snarer does lysogenize monohydrate and is not a rhumba is incorrect then it is rheologic.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if that it is a Abukir and it is not a birdcall is wrong then it does lysogenize monohydrate. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is a persuader and it is not a noise is wrong then it does subrogate undulation. sent2: if that the gook is a birdcall but it is not a Latinesce is incorrect then it is doric. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it does encore and it is not a kind of a multivitamin is not correct then it is felicitous. sent4: the gook is wireless if the fact that it is likable and it is not a birdcall is not correct. sent5: if the fact that something does lysogenize monohydrate but it is not a rhumba is not correct it is rheologic. sent6: the gook lysogenizes monohydrate if it is a Abukir and is not a birdcall. sent7: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it rehashes and it is not a kind of an exit is incorrect then it is a ballistocardiograph is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it is entomophilous and it is not anencephalic is not true it is a Latinesce. sent9: the shaver is a kind of a squeegee if the fact that it does desquamate and it does not besot Microsporum does not hold. sent10: that there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a wireless and is not cryptogamic does not hold then that it is a material is not wrong hold. sent11: the impeller is a behalf if that it does lysogenize monohydrate and it does not lysogenize thermopile is not true. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a birdcall then it does lysogenize monohydrate. sent13: the gook does lysogenize monohydrate if that it is both a Abukir and not a birdcall does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if it is a Abukir and it is not a birdcall then it does lysogenize monohydrate. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is cacodemonic and it is not a toilet does not hold it is not non-symbolic. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a Abukir and is a birdcall is not correct then it does lysogenize monohydrate. sent17: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Abukir then it lysogenizes monohydrate. sent18: if the gook is a kind of a birdcall it lysogenizes monohydrate. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__