the Jacob is epizoan and/or it is a Sazerac.
sent1: the fact that the fact that the Jacob is epizoan or is a Sazerac or both hold is not correct if the elaphure is not abundant. sent2: everything is abundant. sent3: everything is both not non-epizoan and abundant. sent4: if something is not epizoan either it does rerun aura or it is wheaten or both. sent5: if the redshank does not panic kvass but it is abundant the fact that the elaphure is not abundant is correct. sent6: if something is a Sazerac it is abundant. sent7: if that the redshank does rerun professionalization and is not inshore is not right it does not palpebrate. sent8: if the aviator is not a kind of a azimuth and/or it is diabetic it is a diabetic. sent9: the professionalization does not palpebrate if the drove palpebrate but it does not rerun professionalization. sent10: the fact that the redshank does rerun professionalization and is not inshore is wrong. sent11: the Jacob is both a sporting and abundant. sent12: the Parr is epizoan. sent13: the aviator is not a azimuth and/or is a kind of a diabetic. sent14: something is genealogic if it is a diabetic. sent15: the elaphure is a Sazerac and it panics kvass if the fact that there is something such that it does not palpebrate is correct. sent16: something does palpebrate but it does not rerun professionalization if it is not inshore.
sent3 -> int1: the Jacob is epizoan and abundant.; int1 -> int2: the Jacob is epizoan.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that either the Jacob is epizoan or it is a Sazerac or both is false hold.
sent16 -> int3: the drove is not non-palpebrate and does not rerun professionalization if it is not inshore.; sent14 -> int4: if the aviator is diabetic it is genealogic.; sent8 & sent13 -> int5: the aviator is a diabetic.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the aviator is genealogic.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that that it is genealogic is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Jacob is epizoan and/or it is a Sazerac. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that the Jacob is epizoan or is a Sazerac or both hold is not correct if the elaphure is not abundant. sent2: everything is abundant. sent3: everything is both not non-epizoan and abundant. sent4: if something is not epizoan either it does rerun aura or it is wheaten or both. sent5: if the redshank does not panic kvass but it is abundant the fact that the elaphure is not abundant is correct. sent6: if something is a Sazerac it is abundant. sent7: if that the redshank does rerun professionalization and is not inshore is not right it does not palpebrate. sent8: if the aviator is not a kind of a azimuth and/or it is diabetic it is a diabetic. sent9: the professionalization does not palpebrate if the drove palpebrate but it does not rerun professionalization. sent10: the fact that the redshank does rerun professionalization and is not inshore is wrong. sent11: the Jacob is both a sporting and abundant. sent12: the Parr is epizoan. sent13: the aviator is not a azimuth and/or is a kind of a diabetic. sent14: something is genealogic if it is a diabetic. sent15: the elaphure is a Sazerac and it panics kvass if the fact that there is something such that it does not palpebrate is correct. sent16: something does palpebrate but it does not rerun professionalization if it is not inshore. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the Jacob is epizoan and abundant.; int1 -> int2: the Jacob is epizoan.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__