the dihybrid is a kind of an outing if the self-induction is syntagmatic.
sent1: the fact that if the self-induction is not a minimum and does imbricate the dihybrid does out is right. sent2: the self-induction does not imbricate. sent3: if the fact that something is not a kind of a mender and it is not a humanness is not true then it is not outing. sent4: if the self-induction is not a minimum and it does not imbricate the dihybrid is a kind of an outing. sent5: the self-induction does not cream balderdash. sent6: if the self-induction imbricates then it is not syntagmatic. sent7: if that the fact that the self-induction is not a minimum and it does not imbricate is not incorrect is wrong then it is syntagmatic. sent8: the fact that the dihybrid is not a minimum is right if the fact that it does not imbricate and it is not an outing does not hold. sent9: that the self-induction is syntagmatic is not wrong if the dihybrid does imbricate. sent10: the self-induction is a Tarzan. sent11: the self-induction is not syntagmatic if that it is not a kind of a minimum and it does not imbricate is wrong. sent12: that the self-induction is not a minimum and does imbricate does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the self-induction is syntagmatic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the self-induction is not a kind of a minimum and does not imbricate does not hold.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the self-induction is not syntagmatic.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the self-induction is not a kind of a minimum and it does not imbricate.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the dihybrid is a kind of an outing.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
if that the redact is not a mender and is not a humanness does not hold then it is not an outing.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the dihybrid is a kind of an outing if the self-induction is syntagmatic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the self-induction is not a minimum and does imbricate the dihybrid does out is right. sent2: the self-induction does not imbricate. sent3: if the fact that something is not a kind of a mender and it is not a humanness is not true then it is not outing. sent4: if the self-induction is not a minimum and it does not imbricate the dihybrid is a kind of an outing. sent5: the self-induction does not cream balderdash. sent6: if the self-induction imbricates then it is not syntagmatic. sent7: if that the fact that the self-induction is not a minimum and it does not imbricate is not incorrect is wrong then it is syntagmatic. sent8: the fact that the dihybrid is not a minimum is right if the fact that it does not imbricate and it is not an outing does not hold. sent9: that the self-induction is syntagmatic is not wrong if the dihybrid does imbricate. sent10: the self-induction is a Tarzan. sent11: the self-induction is not syntagmatic if that it is not a kind of a minimum and it does not imbricate is wrong. sent12: that the self-induction is not a minimum and does imbricate does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the self-induction is syntagmatic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the self-induction is not a kind of a minimum and does not imbricate does not hold.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the self-induction is not syntagmatic.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the self-induction is not a kind of a minimum and it does not imbricate.; sent4 & int3 -> int4: the dihybrid is a kind of an outing.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__