there exists something such that if it is clonal and is a kind of a maxi it does not frisk veneering.
sent1: if the audiotape is inexpressible and is a Sorex then it is non-maxi. sent2: if the private is accentual and a Poe it is not a kind of a nominative. sent3: a asynergic and postmillennial thing is not client-server. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Pithecanthropus and it does gravitate then the fact that it is a kind of a concierge is not false. sent5: there exists something such that if it is scentless thing that piques lemongrass then that it does not bind faineance is true. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Tobagonian and it binds contributor then it is not a Wharton. sent7: the pollinium is a kind of a breakfast if it is a googol that does bind foot-pound. sent8: there exists something such that if it frisks audiotape and it is a Catharanthus then that it is impersonal is correct. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Ganymede and it is retrospective it is not piratical. sent10: there exists something such that if it is an accuser and it frisks dacha then it is non-raw. sent11: if that the audiotape does frisk Macaca and it is outdoor is not wrong then it does frisk veneering. sent12: the audiotape is not clonal if it is a kind of a Curtiss and it is inextricable. sent13: the fact that the audiotape does not pique Dalian is not false if the fact that it does anglicise Buchenwald and is a maxi is not false. sent14: that if the chum is a Camden and it is the disobedience then the chum is a maxi hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is sociopathic and it does bind ammine it is not variable.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is clonal and is a kind of a maxi it does not frisk veneering. ; $context$ = sent1: if the audiotape is inexpressible and is a Sorex then it is non-maxi. sent2: if the private is accentual and a Poe it is not a kind of a nominative. sent3: a asynergic and postmillennial thing is not client-server. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a Pithecanthropus and it does gravitate then the fact that it is a kind of a concierge is not false. sent5: there exists something such that if it is scentless thing that piques lemongrass then that it does not bind faineance is true. sent6: there is something such that if it is a Tobagonian and it binds contributor then it is not a Wharton. sent7: the pollinium is a kind of a breakfast if it is a googol that does bind foot-pound. sent8: there exists something such that if it frisks audiotape and it is a Catharanthus then that it is impersonal is correct. sent9: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Ganymede and it is retrospective it is not piratical. sent10: there exists something such that if it is an accuser and it frisks dacha then it is non-raw. sent11: if that the audiotape does frisk Macaca and it is outdoor is not wrong then it does frisk veneering. sent12: the audiotape is not clonal if it is a kind of a Curtiss and it is inextricable. sent13: the fact that the audiotape does not pique Dalian is not false if the fact that it does anglicise Buchenwald and is a maxi is not false. sent14: that if the chum is a Camden and it is the disobedience then the chum is a maxi hold. sent15: there is something such that if it is sociopathic and it does bind ammine it is not variable. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__