the intensifying historicalness does not occur if the lustrum does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the fact that not the championship but the digitalness happens hold does not hold. sent2: if the ratcheting volumed does not occur the abnormality does not occur. sent3: the woodiness does not occur. sent4: the preying scorpion happens. sent5: the intensifying historicalness occurs if the antecedent does not occur. sent6: the intensifying historicalness occurs. sent7: the non-antecedentness prevents that the intensifying historicalness happens. sent8: the fact that the lustrum does not occur but the antecedentness happens is incorrect. sent9: if the lustrum does not occur then the intensifying historicalness happens. sent10: the nobbling does not occur. sent11: the ratcheting volumed does not occur. sent12: the non-Belgianness causes that the ciliariness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lustrum does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the antecedentness occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: not the lustrum but the antecedent happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the antecedentness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the intensifying historicalness does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the intensifying historicalness does not occur if the lustrum does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that not the championship but the digitalness happens hold does not hold. sent2: if the ratcheting volumed does not occur the abnormality does not occur. sent3: the woodiness does not occur. sent4: the preying scorpion happens. sent5: the intensifying historicalness occurs if the antecedent does not occur. sent6: the intensifying historicalness occurs. sent7: the non-antecedentness prevents that the intensifying historicalness happens. sent8: the fact that the lustrum does not occur but the antecedentness happens is incorrect. sent9: if the lustrum does not occur then the intensifying historicalness happens. sent10: the nobbling does not occur. sent11: the ratcheting volumed does not occur. sent12: the non-Belgianness causes that the ciliariness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lustrum does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the antecedentness occurs.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: not the lustrum but the antecedent happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the antecedentness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the intensifying historicalness does not occur is correct.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__