that the catastrophe does not occur if the determining wingstem does not occur is wrong.
sent1: that the dogmatizing Flodden and the battue occurs does not hold. sent2: the section does not occur. sent3: the catastrophe occurs if that the fusion occurs is correct. sent4: the fact that the trafficking redeye and the determining wingstem occurs is incorrect. sent5: the trafficking cheroot happens and the fusion occurs if the cerebralness does not occur. sent6: that the catastrophe does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the fact that the trafficking redeye does not occur but the determining wingstem occurs hold is not right is correct. sent7: the fact that the jamming does not occur is correct. sent8: the trafficking redeye occurs. sent9: that the determining wingstem happens causes that the catastrophe does not occur. sent10: that the determining wingstem does not occur and the trafficking redeye does not occur prevents that the sonicness does not occur. sent11: that not the determining kinase but the clanger occurs is incorrect. sent12: if the trafficking redeye does not occur but the determining wingstem happens then the catastrophe does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trafficking redeye does not occur but the determining wingstem happens.; assump1 -> int1: the determining wingstem occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the determining wingstem does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that not the trafficking redeye but the determining wingstem occurs is incorrect.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the catastrophe does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the sonicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the catastrophe does not occur if the determining wingstem does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the dogmatizing Flodden and the battue occurs does not hold. sent2: the section does not occur. sent3: the catastrophe occurs if that the fusion occurs is correct. sent4: the fact that the trafficking redeye and the determining wingstem occurs is incorrect. sent5: the trafficking cheroot happens and the fusion occurs if the cerebralness does not occur. sent6: that the catastrophe does not occur is true if the fact that the fact that the fact that the trafficking redeye does not occur but the determining wingstem occurs hold is not right is correct. sent7: the fact that the jamming does not occur is correct. sent8: the trafficking redeye occurs. sent9: that the determining wingstem happens causes that the catastrophe does not occur. sent10: that the determining wingstem does not occur and the trafficking redeye does not occur prevents that the sonicness does not occur. sent11: that not the determining kinase but the clanger occurs is incorrect. sent12: if the trafficking redeye does not occur but the determining wingstem happens then the catastrophe does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trafficking redeye does not occur but the determining wingstem happens.; assump1 -> int1: the determining wingstem occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the determining wingstem does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that not the trafficking redeye but the determining wingstem occurs is incorrect.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the catastrophe does not occur.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__