the fact that the stamina does not deposit schemer hold.
sent1: if that either the sterol is not a streetlight or it is not a kind of a maharaja or both is not correct then the nostril does mobilize. sent2: if the fact that the sterol is not a streetlight and/or it is a maharaja is not right then that the nostril does mobilize is not false. sent3: there is something such that it is not a kind of a leavened. sent4: if that the sterol is a streetlight or it is not a maharaja or both does not hold the nostril mobilizes. sent5: the Stinger is livable. sent6: the sterol is disrespectful if it is a kind of a maharaja. sent7: the fact that the fact that the stamina does not deposit schemer and is not rocky is wrong is not false if it is not a leavened. sent8: if the fact that something does trundle MD but it is not a kind of a concretion is not true then it does not trundle MD. sent9: the fact that the nostril is livable and not disrespectful is not true. sent10: something is rocky if the fact that it does not mobilize and it is not a maharaja does not hold. sent11: the stamina is not a streetlight and it is not a leavened if the excogitator is not a kind of a maharaja. sent12: The vindictiveness does not trundle excogitator. sent13: the excogitator does not trundle vindictiveness. sent14: there is something such that it is not factory-made and it does measure gracefulness. sent15: that that something is not a streetlight and not a leavened is not correct if it is rocky hold. sent16: if that something is livable but it is not disrespectful is false it is not livable. sent17: if the fact that something is not a leavened and it does not trundle vindictiveness is not wrong then the stamina does not deposit schemer. sent18: if the fact that something is both not a leavened and rocky is false it deposits schemer. sent19: something is livable if it mobilizes. sent20: if that the excogitator is not a kind of a streetlight and it is not a kind of a leavened is not true the equinox is not a kind of a streetlight. sent21: if something is not non-rocky then that it is not a streetlight or not a maharaja or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the excogitator is a kind of a leavened.; sent21 -> int1: if the sterol is rocky then that it is either not a streetlight or not a maharaja or both does not hold.; sent19 -> int2: if the nostril does mobilize then it is livable.; sent16 -> int3: if the fact that the nostril is livable but it is not disrespectful does not hold then that it is not livable hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the nostril is not livable.;
the equinox is not a streetlight.
sent15 -> int5: the fact that the excogitator is not a streetlight and not a leavened does not hold if it is rocky.; sent10 -> int6: the excogitator is rocky if the fact that it does not mobilize and it is not a maharaja is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stamina does not deposit schemer hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that either the sterol is not a streetlight or it is not a kind of a maharaja or both is not correct then the nostril does mobilize. sent2: if the fact that the sterol is not a streetlight and/or it is a maharaja is not right then that the nostril does mobilize is not false. sent3: there is something such that it is not a kind of a leavened. sent4: if that the sterol is a streetlight or it is not a maharaja or both does not hold the nostril mobilizes. sent5: the Stinger is livable. sent6: the sterol is disrespectful if it is a kind of a maharaja. sent7: the fact that the fact that the stamina does not deposit schemer and is not rocky is wrong is not false if it is not a leavened. sent8: if the fact that something does trundle MD but it is not a kind of a concretion is not true then it does not trundle MD. sent9: the fact that the nostril is livable and not disrespectful is not true. sent10: something is rocky if the fact that it does not mobilize and it is not a maharaja does not hold. sent11: the stamina is not a streetlight and it is not a leavened if the excogitator is not a kind of a maharaja. sent12: The vindictiveness does not trundle excogitator. sent13: the excogitator does not trundle vindictiveness. sent14: there is something such that it is not factory-made and it does measure gracefulness. sent15: that that something is not a streetlight and not a leavened is not correct if it is rocky hold. sent16: if that something is livable but it is not disrespectful is false it is not livable. sent17: if the fact that something is not a leavened and it does not trundle vindictiveness is not wrong then the stamina does not deposit schemer. sent18: if the fact that something is both not a leavened and rocky is false it deposits schemer. sent19: something is livable if it mobilizes. sent20: if that the excogitator is not a kind of a streetlight and it is not a kind of a leavened is not true the equinox is not a kind of a streetlight. sent21: if something is not non-rocky then that it is not a streetlight or not a maharaja or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the excogitator is a kind of a leavened.; sent21 -> int1: if the sterol is rocky then that it is either not a streetlight or not a maharaja or both does not hold.; sent19 -> int2: if the nostril does mobilize then it is livable.; sent16 -> int3: if the fact that the nostril is livable but it is not disrespectful does not hold then that it is not livable hold.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the nostril is not livable.; __UNKNOWN__