the indigestibleness occurs.
sent1: the postmillennialness occurs. sent2: the ectopicness does not occur. sent3: that the fix does not occur yields that the steepening save-all happens and the impoliteness occurs. sent4: if the inviting danaid does not occur then the fact that the postmillennialness happens but the steepening save-all does not occur is not right. sent5: if the fact that not the inviting danaid but the contemplating happens is not correct then the indigestibleness happens. sent6: if the postmillennialness does not occur the fact that the inviting danaid does not occur and the contemplating does not occur is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inviting danaid does not occur but the contemplating happens.; assump1 -> int1: the inviting danaid does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the postmillennialness happens and the steepening save-all does not occur is not correct.;
the indigestibleness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the indigestibleness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the postmillennialness occurs. sent2: the ectopicness does not occur. sent3: that the fix does not occur yields that the steepening save-all happens and the impoliteness occurs. sent4: if the inviting danaid does not occur then the fact that the postmillennialness happens but the steepening save-all does not occur is not right. sent5: if the fact that not the inviting danaid but the contemplating happens is not correct then the indigestibleness happens. sent6: if the postmillennialness does not occur the fact that the inviting danaid does not occur and the contemplating does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inviting danaid does not occur but the contemplating happens.; assump1 -> int1: the inviting danaid does not occur.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the postmillennialness happens and the steepening save-all does not occur is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__