the fact that there exists something such that it is a vibrato and is not a lamination is not true.
sent1: if there exists something such that it vexes euphonium the exponent is a twinkling and decorates Teresa. sent2: the fact that the exponent is a rededication is true. sent3: the microgliacyte is a fraternization and it is a glucosamine. sent4: that the fact that something is a kind of a lamination and it is a kind of a vibrato is right is false if it is not a cumulonimbus. sent5: there is something such that it is not a lamination. sent6: if something vexes euphonium it is a vibrato that is not a lamination. sent7: if something is a aborticide and it does decorate tessera the diapir is not eutherian. sent8: the pterosaur vexes euphonium if the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of a rededication and does not vexes euphonium is wrong hold. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a vibrato. sent10: there is something such that it is a vibrato and is a lamination. sent11: the exponent is not a lamination. sent12: the exponent vexes euphonium and it is a rededication. sent13: the homeopath is a rededication. sent14: if the exponent vexes euphonium then it is not a kind of a lamination. sent15: if the diapir is not eutherian the flypaper is not a cumulonimbus. sent16: the anvil is not a vibrato if that the flypaper is a lamination and it is a kind of a vibrato does not hold. sent17: the exponent is a slipstream. sent18: if something is not a Jagannath it is a aborticide and it decorates tessera. sent19: if something does vex euphonium it is not a lamination. sent20: that everything is not a Jagannath is not incorrect.
sent12 -> int1: the exponent vexes euphonium.; sent6 -> int2: that the exponent is a vibrato and is not a lamination is correct if the fact that it does vex euphonium is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the exponent is a vibrato but not a lamination.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the exponent does twinkle and it decorates Teresa.
sent18 -> int4: if the chrysolite is not a Jagannath it is a aborticide and decorates tessera.; sent20 -> int5: the chrysolite is not a Jagannath.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chrysolite is a aborticide that decorates tessera.; int6 -> int7: everything is a aborticide and it decorates tessera.; int7 -> int8: the subtopia is a kind of a aborticide and decorates tessera.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a aborticide and it decorates tessera.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the diapir is not eutherian.; int10 & sent15 -> int11: the flypaper is not a cumulonimbus.; sent4 -> int12: that the flypaper is a lamination and a vibrato is not right if the fact that it is not a cumulonimbus hold.; int11 & int12 -> int13: that the flypaper is both a lamination and a vibrato is not true.; int13 & sent16 -> int14: the anvil is not a vibrato.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is a vibrato and is not a lamination is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it vexes euphonium the exponent is a twinkling and decorates Teresa. sent2: the fact that the exponent is a rededication is true. sent3: the microgliacyte is a fraternization and it is a glucosamine. sent4: that the fact that something is a kind of a lamination and it is a kind of a vibrato is right is false if it is not a cumulonimbus. sent5: there is something such that it is not a lamination. sent6: if something vexes euphonium it is a vibrato that is not a lamination. sent7: if something is a aborticide and it does decorate tessera the diapir is not eutherian. sent8: the pterosaur vexes euphonium if the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of a rededication and does not vexes euphonium is wrong hold. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a vibrato. sent10: there is something such that it is a vibrato and is a lamination. sent11: the exponent is not a lamination. sent12: the exponent vexes euphonium and it is a rededication. sent13: the homeopath is a rededication. sent14: if the exponent vexes euphonium then it is not a kind of a lamination. sent15: if the diapir is not eutherian the flypaper is not a cumulonimbus. sent16: the anvil is not a vibrato if that the flypaper is a lamination and it is a kind of a vibrato does not hold. sent17: the exponent is a slipstream. sent18: if something is not a Jagannath it is a aborticide and it decorates tessera. sent19: if something does vex euphonium it is not a lamination. sent20: that everything is not a Jagannath is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the exponent vexes euphonium.; sent6 -> int2: that the exponent is a vibrato and is not a lamination is correct if the fact that it does vex euphonium is not false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the exponent is a vibrato but not a lamination.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__