the weeding diagram and the compassionateness happens.
sent1: that the extemporization does not occur brings about that the weeding sting occurs. sent2: the experiencing occurs if the mock does not occur. sent3: the compassionateness happens if the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent4: the experience happens. sent5: the goal-kick occurs. sent6: that the weeding diagram happens and the compassionateness occurs is caused by the non-microeconomicsness. sent7: the extemporization does not occur. sent8: if the allomerism occurs then the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent9: the goal-kick and/or the taking happens. sent10: the emmetropicness occurs and the aromatherapy happens if the everting does not occur. sent11: the compassionateness happens. sent12: if the belch happens and the taking does not occur the fact that the allomerism happens hold. sent13: both the experiencing and the belch occurs if the fact that the mock does not occur hold. sent14: the fact that the stockpiling does not occur and the taking does not occur is not right if the belch does not occur. sent15: the mock does not occur. sent16: the intrusiveness occurs if the goal-kick happens. sent17: if the goal-kick does not occur then the fact that the weeding diagram and the compassionateness occurs does not hold. sent18: the weeding sting occurs. sent19: if both the goal-kick and the take occurs then the fact that the stockpiling does not occur is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the taking occurs is correct.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the goal-kick and the taking occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the stockpiling does not occur is right.; sent13 & sent15 -> int3: the experiencing and the belch occurs.; int3 -> int4: the belch happens.;
the fact that the weeding diagram and the compassionateness occurs is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the weeding diagram and the compassionateness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the extemporization does not occur brings about that the weeding sting occurs. sent2: the experiencing occurs if the mock does not occur. sent3: the compassionateness happens if the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent4: the experience happens. sent5: the goal-kick occurs. sent6: that the weeding diagram happens and the compassionateness occurs is caused by the non-microeconomicsness. sent7: the extemporization does not occur. sent8: if the allomerism occurs then the microeconomicsness does not occur. sent9: the goal-kick and/or the taking happens. sent10: the emmetropicness occurs and the aromatherapy happens if the everting does not occur. sent11: the compassionateness happens. sent12: if the belch happens and the taking does not occur the fact that the allomerism happens hold. sent13: both the experiencing and the belch occurs if the fact that the mock does not occur hold. sent14: the fact that the stockpiling does not occur and the taking does not occur is not right if the belch does not occur. sent15: the mock does not occur. sent16: the intrusiveness occurs if the goal-kick happens. sent17: if the goal-kick does not occur then the fact that the weeding diagram and the compassionateness occurs does not hold. sent18: the weeding sting occurs. sent19: if both the goal-kick and the take occurs then the fact that the stockpiling does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the taking occurs is correct.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the goal-kick and the taking occurs.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: that the stockpiling does not occur is right.; sent13 & sent15 -> int3: the experiencing and the belch occurs.; int3 -> int4: the belch happens.; __UNKNOWN__