not the beholding atorvastatin but the looting occurs if the dimming happens.
sent1: that the nonconductiveness does not occur is prevented by the nonpasserineness. sent2: the devotional occurs and the sensorimotorness occurs. sent3: that the beholding atorvastatin happens and/or the nonpasserineness occurs is brought about by that the looting does not occur. sent4: the distilling happens if the nonconductiveness occurs. sent5: if the devotional happens the looting happens. sent6: that the dimming does not occur is triggered by that the nonpasserineness occurs and the beholding atorvastatin happens. sent7: if the beholding atorvastatin occurs the nonconductiveness occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the beholding atorvastatin occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dimmedness happens.; sent2 -> int1: the devotional occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the looting happens.;
the distilling happens and the accurateness happens.
$hypothesis$ = not the beholding atorvastatin but the looting occurs if the dimming happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the nonconductiveness does not occur is prevented by the nonpasserineness. sent2: the devotional occurs and the sensorimotorness occurs. sent3: that the beholding atorvastatin happens and/or the nonpasserineness occurs is brought about by that the looting does not occur. sent4: the distilling happens if the nonconductiveness occurs. sent5: if the devotional happens the looting happens. sent6: that the dimming does not occur is triggered by that the nonpasserineness occurs and the beholding atorvastatin happens. sent7: if the beholding atorvastatin occurs the nonconductiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the beholding atorvastatin occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dimmedness happens.; sent2 -> int1: the devotional occurs.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the looting happens.; __UNKNOWN__