the Californianness happens.
sent1: the fact that the counterintelligence does not occur but the charitableness occurs is not true if the predation does not occur. sent2: either that the counterintelligence does not occur or the charitableness or both prevents that the Californianness occurs. sent3: if the fact that not the organizing ironing but the Comstockery happens is not right the freckling drupe does not occur. sent4: if that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur is false then the infantileness does not occur. sent5: if the infantileness does not occur then either the counterintelligence does not occur or the charitableness happens or both. sent6: the decoupage does not occur. sent7: the charitableness does not occur if the fact that the counterintelligence does not occur and the charitableness happens is not correct. sent8: that the vagalness does not occur brings about the lark or that the agribusiness happens or both. sent9: if the non-intrasententialness and the freckling cocooning occurs the predation does not occur. sent10: the intrasententialness does not occur if the fact that the tango does not occur and the hydropathy does not occur is incorrect. sent11: if that not the predation but the intrasententialness happens is false the freckling bullock does not occur. sent12: that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur prevents that the freckling bullock does not occur. sent13: the freckling cocooning happens if the nickeling Eupatorium occurs. sent14: the fact that not the predation but the intrasententialness occurs does not hold. sent15: that the freckling parody does not occur and the organizing bodywork does not occur yields that the freckling Spokane occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the freckling bullock happens.; sent11 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the freckling bullock does not occur is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur does not hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the infantileness does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the counterintelligence does not occur or the charitableness occurs or both.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the Californian happens.
$hypothesis$ = the Californianness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the counterintelligence does not occur but the charitableness occurs is not true if the predation does not occur. sent2: either that the counterintelligence does not occur or the charitableness or both prevents that the Californianness occurs. sent3: if the fact that not the organizing ironing but the Comstockery happens is not right the freckling drupe does not occur. sent4: if that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur is false then the infantileness does not occur. sent5: if the infantileness does not occur then either the counterintelligence does not occur or the charitableness happens or both. sent6: the decoupage does not occur. sent7: the charitableness does not occur if the fact that the counterintelligence does not occur and the charitableness happens is not correct. sent8: that the vagalness does not occur brings about the lark or that the agribusiness happens or both. sent9: if the non-intrasententialness and the freckling cocooning occurs the predation does not occur. sent10: the intrasententialness does not occur if the fact that the tango does not occur and the hydropathy does not occur is incorrect. sent11: if that not the predation but the intrasententialness happens is false the freckling bullock does not occur. sent12: that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur prevents that the freckling bullock does not occur. sent13: the freckling cocooning happens if the nickeling Eupatorium occurs. sent14: the fact that not the predation but the intrasententialness occurs does not hold. sent15: that the freckling parody does not occur and the organizing bodywork does not occur yields that the freckling Spokane occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the freckling bullock happens.; sent11 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the freckling bullock does not occur is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the diastole does not occur and the arterioscleroticness does not occur does not hold.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the infantileness does not occur.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the counterintelligence does not occur or the charitableness occurs or both.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__