the lodestar is an archivist.
sent1: if the stonefish does not quieten rectum then the decapod is an archivist and Thoreauvian. sent2: the lash does administer fusee. sent3: the punks is a autotelism that is not a kind of a Fontanne. sent4: if the fact that something is basophilic but it does not broker is true then it is not hollow. sent5: there is something such that it is Thoreauvian. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not Thoreauvian then the Thai does quieten rectum and does not hollow. sent7: if the decapod is a kind of an archivist then the Thai is an archivist. sent8: that the lodestar is not a hollow is right if the fact that the Thai quietens rectum and is not an archivist is correct. sent9: if the Thai is a kind of an archivist that the lodestar is a kind of an archivist is right. sent10: the lodestar does not quieten rectum if the Thai does hollow but it is not an archivist. sent11: something that does administer Adalia is basophilic. sent12: if something is not a dissipation it does quieten lash and it is not a kind of a grog. sent13: the Thai does quieten rectum. sent14: the lodestar is not an archivist if the fact that the Thai does quieten rectum but it is non-hollow is not incorrect. sent15: the Thai does quieten rectum and is not an archivist. sent16: that the fusee is a call-in hold if the lash is not a Progne and/or it is not incurious. sent17: the fact that the fusee does huddle but it is not nectar-rich is not right if it is a kind of a call-in. sent18: something is non-Thoreauvian. sent19: if the lash administers fusee then it is not a kind of a Progne or it is not incurious or both. sent20: if something is basophilic then the fact that the noncom is non-hollow thing that brokers is false. sent21: if something quietens lash but it is not a grog the fact that it does administer Adalia is not false. sent22: if there is something such that it is not Thoreauvian the Thai quietens rectum. sent23: the Pastor is not a dissipation if that the fusee is both a huddler and not nectar-rich is not correct.
sent18 & sent6 -> int1: the Thai quietens rectum but it is not hollow.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the lodestar is an archivist.
sent11 -> int2: that the Pastor is basophilic is correct if the fact that it does not administer Adalia does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: the Pastor administers Adalia if it does quieten lash and it is not a grog.; sent12 -> int4: the Pastor does quieten lash and is not a grog if it is not a dissipation.; sent19 & sent2 -> int5: that the lash is not a kind of a Progne or it is not incurious or both is not false.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the fusee is a call-in.; sent17 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the fusee is a huddler but it is not nectar-rich is not true.; sent23 & int7 -> int8: the Pastor is not a dissipation.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the Pastor quietens lash but it is not a grog.; int3 & int9 -> int10: the Pastor does administer Adalia.; int2 & int10 -> int11: the Pastor is basophilic.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is basophilic is right.; int12 & sent20 -> int13: that that the noncom is not a kind of a hollow but it does broker does not hold hold.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a hollow and it does broker is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the lodestar is an archivist. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stonefish does not quieten rectum then the decapod is an archivist and Thoreauvian. sent2: the lash does administer fusee. sent3: the punks is a autotelism that is not a kind of a Fontanne. sent4: if the fact that something is basophilic but it does not broker is true then it is not hollow. sent5: there is something such that it is Thoreauvian. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not Thoreauvian then the Thai does quieten rectum and does not hollow. sent7: if the decapod is a kind of an archivist then the Thai is an archivist. sent8: that the lodestar is not a hollow is right if the fact that the Thai quietens rectum and is not an archivist is correct. sent9: if the Thai is a kind of an archivist that the lodestar is a kind of an archivist is right. sent10: the lodestar does not quieten rectum if the Thai does hollow but it is not an archivist. sent11: something that does administer Adalia is basophilic. sent12: if something is not a dissipation it does quieten lash and it is not a kind of a grog. sent13: the Thai does quieten rectum. sent14: the lodestar is not an archivist if the fact that the Thai does quieten rectum but it is non-hollow is not incorrect. sent15: the Thai does quieten rectum and is not an archivist. sent16: that the fusee is a call-in hold if the lash is not a Progne and/or it is not incurious. sent17: the fact that the fusee does huddle but it is not nectar-rich is not right if it is a kind of a call-in. sent18: something is non-Thoreauvian. sent19: if the lash administers fusee then it is not a kind of a Progne or it is not incurious or both. sent20: if something is basophilic then the fact that the noncom is non-hollow thing that brokers is false. sent21: if something quietens lash but it is not a grog the fact that it does administer Adalia is not false. sent22: if there is something such that it is not Thoreauvian the Thai quietens rectum. sent23: the Pastor is not a dissipation if that the fusee is both a huddler and not nectar-rich is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent6 -> int1: the Thai quietens rectum but it is not hollow.; sent14 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__