the training happens.
sent1: both the breastlessness and the disrespecting ilang-ilang happens. sent2: if the seeking does not occur then the undertow happens. sent3: the lapping Komi does not occur if that the nonfatalness does not occur and the lapping Komi happens is not right. sent4: the breastlessness occurs. sent5: the lobectomy occurs. sent6: the whanging mannitol is prevented by that that both the disrespecting ilang-ilang and the training happens is right. sent7: the re-entrantness happens. sent8: if the fact that the Arameanness occurs is right then the whanging mannitol happens. sent9: if the fact that the fact that the nonfatalness occurs and the nim happens is false is not wrong then that the nonfatalness happens is not right. sent10: that the undertow does not occur results in that the Aramean occurs and/or the whanging mannitol. sent11: the professorship occurs. sent12: if both the non-Arameanness and the whanging mannitol happens then the breastlessness does not occur. sent13: the lapping dragonet does not occur. sent14: that the disrespecting ilang-ilang but not the training occurs is not right if the fact that the breastlessness does not occur is right. sent15: if the breastlessness happens the fulling occurs. sent16: that the lapping Komi does not occur causes that the undertow and the seeking occurs. sent17: if the training occurs but the disrespecting ilang-ilang does not occur then the psychosexualness happens. sent18: the disrespecting symphysion does not occur. sent19: the training happens if the fact that the disrespecting ilang-ilang but not the training occurs is incorrect. sent20: that the seeking happens is not true. sent21: the non-breastlessness is prevented by that the whanging mannitol occurs. sent22: the breastlessness is triggered by that the Aramean occurs. sent23: the Aramean happens and the undertow happens if the seeking does not occur. sent24: the undertow happens. sent25: that the nonfatalness happens and the nim happens is incorrect.
sent1 -> int1: the disrespecting ilang-ilang happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the training happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the disrespecting ilang-ilang happens and the training occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the whanging mannitol does not occur.; sent23 & sent20 -> int4: the Arameanness happens and the undertow occurs.; int4 -> int5: the Aramean happens.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the whanging mannitol occurs is right.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fullness and the psychosexualness occurs.
sent9 & sent25 -> int8: the nonfatalness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the training happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the breastlessness and the disrespecting ilang-ilang happens. sent2: if the seeking does not occur then the undertow happens. sent3: the lapping Komi does not occur if that the nonfatalness does not occur and the lapping Komi happens is not right. sent4: the breastlessness occurs. sent5: the lobectomy occurs. sent6: the whanging mannitol is prevented by that that both the disrespecting ilang-ilang and the training happens is right. sent7: the re-entrantness happens. sent8: if the fact that the Arameanness occurs is right then the whanging mannitol happens. sent9: if the fact that the fact that the nonfatalness occurs and the nim happens is false is not wrong then that the nonfatalness happens is not right. sent10: that the undertow does not occur results in that the Aramean occurs and/or the whanging mannitol. sent11: the professorship occurs. sent12: if both the non-Arameanness and the whanging mannitol happens then the breastlessness does not occur. sent13: the lapping dragonet does not occur. sent14: that the disrespecting ilang-ilang but not the training occurs is not right if the fact that the breastlessness does not occur is right. sent15: if the breastlessness happens the fulling occurs. sent16: that the lapping Komi does not occur causes that the undertow and the seeking occurs. sent17: if the training occurs but the disrespecting ilang-ilang does not occur then the psychosexualness happens. sent18: the disrespecting symphysion does not occur. sent19: the training happens if the fact that the disrespecting ilang-ilang but not the training occurs is incorrect. sent20: that the seeking happens is not true. sent21: the non-breastlessness is prevented by that the whanging mannitol occurs. sent22: the breastlessness is triggered by that the Aramean occurs. sent23: the Aramean happens and the undertow happens if the seeking does not occur. sent24: the undertow happens. sent25: that the nonfatalness happens and the nim happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the disrespecting ilang-ilang happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the training happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the disrespecting ilang-ilang happens and the training occurs.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the whanging mannitol does not occur.; sent23 & sent20 -> int4: the Arameanness happens and the undertow occurs.; int4 -> int5: the Aramean happens.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: that the whanging mannitol occurs is right.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__