the fact that either the upstart rights viscountess or it is a practiced or both does not hold.
sent1: the waders is a Serbian. sent2: the waders is a Serbian but it is not a Hemiramphidae. sent3: if the viscountess is not a kind of a Serbian the sapphire is a kind of a Serbian. sent4: the fact that the upstart does right viscountess or it does practice or both is false if the Dodgem is not a kind of a practice. sent5: if the waders is a practiced then the upstart is a Hemiramphidae. sent6: that that something is a kind of a Hemiramphidae and is not dimorphic is not false is wrong if the fact that it is Serbian is right. sent7: the viscountess does right viscountess if the waders does not patronize bichromate and it is not a Hemiramphidae. sent8: there are phonetic things. sent9: if there are phonetic things the fact that the novillero is a permit that patronizes cased is not true. sent10: if the belvedere is not an efferent then it is not non-dimorphic and it practices. sent11: if something is boneless the viscountess does not patronize bichromate and is not a kind of a Ammodytidae. sent12: the upstart does not patronize bichromate and is not boneless if the Dodgem is a Ammodytidae. sent13: the fact that the viscountess does not patronize bichromate is correct if something is boneless. sent14: the Dodgem does not din parsley. sent15: something is a Serbian. sent16: something does practice if it is an efferent. sent17: if the fact that something is a Hemiramphidae and not dimorphic is not true then it is a kind of a Ammodytidae. sent18: if the Dodgem is not non-efferent that the sapphire is boneless is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that the belvedere is boneless and/or it does not patronize bichromate is incorrect then it is not an efferent. sent20: if the viscountess does not patronize bichromate and it is not a Ammodytidae the novillero is dimorphic. sent21: if something that does not patronize bichromate is not boneless then it is efferent. sent22: the Dodgem is efferent if it is a practiced. sent23: if the waders is a kind of a Serbian that is not a Hemiramphidae the divan is not a kind of a Hemiramphidae. sent24: the Dodgem is Serbian if the sapphire is a Serbian. sent25: if the upstart patronizes bichromate the viscountess is a practiced.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Dodgem is a practiced.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the Dodgem is a kind of an efferent.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the sapphire is boneless.; int2 -> int3: there are boneless things.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the viscountess does not patronize bichromate and is not a kind of a Ammodytidae.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the novillero is dimorphic.; sent23 & sent2 -> int6: the divan is not a Hemiramphidae.;
the belvedere is dimorphic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the upstart rights viscountess or it is a practiced or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the waders is a Serbian. sent2: the waders is a Serbian but it is not a Hemiramphidae. sent3: if the viscountess is not a kind of a Serbian the sapphire is a kind of a Serbian. sent4: the fact that the upstart does right viscountess or it does practice or both is false if the Dodgem is not a kind of a practice. sent5: if the waders is a practiced then the upstart is a Hemiramphidae. sent6: that that something is a kind of a Hemiramphidae and is not dimorphic is not false is wrong if the fact that it is Serbian is right. sent7: the viscountess does right viscountess if the waders does not patronize bichromate and it is not a Hemiramphidae. sent8: there are phonetic things. sent9: if there are phonetic things the fact that the novillero is a permit that patronizes cased is not true. sent10: if the belvedere is not an efferent then it is not non-dimorphic and it practices. sent11: if something is boneless the viscountess does not patronize bichromate and is not a kind of a Ammodytidae. sent12: the upstart does not patronize bichromate and is not boneless if the Dodgem is a Ammodytidae. sent13: the fact that the viscountess does not patronize bichromate is correct if something is boneless. sent14: the Dodgem does not din parsley. sent15: something is a Serbian. sent16: something does practice if it is an efferent. sent17: if the fact that something is a Hemiramphidae and not dimorphic is not true then it is a kind of a Ammodytidae. sent18: if the Dodgem is not non-efferent that the sapphire is boneless is not wrong. sent19: if the fact that the belvedere is boneless and/or it does not patronize bichromate is incorrect then it is not an efferent. sent20: if the viscountess does not patronize bichromate and it is not a Ammodytidae the novillero is dimorphic. sent21: if something that does not patronize bichromate is not boneless then it is efferent. sent22: the Dodgem is efferent if it is a practiced. sent23: if the waders is a kind of a Serbian that is not a Hemiramphidae the divan is not a kind of a Hemiramphidae. sent24: the Dodgem is Serbian if the sapphire is a Serbian. sent25: if the upstart patronizes bichromate the viscountess is a practiced. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Dodgem is a practiced.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the Dodgem is a kind of an efferent.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the sapphire is boneless.; int2 -> int3: there are boneless things.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the viscountess does not patronize bichromate and is not a kind of a Ammodytidae.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the novillero is dimorphic.; sent23 & sent2 -> int6: the divan is not a Hemiramphidae.; __UNKNOWN__