the fact that the Proustianness happens is correct.
sent1: the Pasteurianness does not occur if that that the cropping blotter occurs but the recourse does not occur is not false is not true. sent2: the session leads to that the indeterminableness occurs but the cropping dace does not occur. sent3: if the cropping dace does not occur the fact that both the worshipping and the cloudiness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the refreshing happens then the worship occurs. sent5: the cropping dace occurs. sent6: that the manhunt happens is correct if the noncurrentness occurs. sent7: that not the bullshiting Remus but the cropping Sternotherus happens causes that the session occurs. sent8: the Crow does not occur and the hypophysectomy does not occur. sent9: that the cropping dace does not occur is prevented by that the indeterminableness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the Pasteurianness does not occur is correct then the dichotomization does not occur and the ferry does not occur. sent11: the fact that the embarrassment happens and the refreshing occurs does not hold. sent12: the administration does not occur. sent13: that the naught does not occur leads to that either the Finnishness or the filibustering or both happens. sent14: if the fact that the embarrassment occurs and the refreshing does not occur is not correct the worshipping happens. sent15: the cloudiness does not occur if both the worship and the Proustianness occurs. sent16: the Proustianness is triggered by that both the non-cloudiness and the worshipping happens. sent17: the session does not occur. sent18: the Proustianness occurs and the gynecologicalness happens if the worshipping does not occur. sent19: if that the vasotomy does not occur and the rupestralness does not occur is wrong the bullshiting Remus does not occur. sent20: that the embarrassment but not the refreshing happens is incorrect. sent21: the indeterminableness does not occur and the session does not occur. sent22: that the vasotomy does not occur and the rupestralness does not occur does not hold if the ferrying does not occur. sent23: the cloudiness happens and the cropping dace occurs if that the indeterminableness does not occur hold. sent24: the fact that the cropping blotter but not the recourse occurs is wrong.
sent14 & sent20 -> int1: that that the worship does not occur is not true is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Proustianness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the worshipping and the Proustianness happens.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that the cloudiness does not occur hold.; sent21 -> int4: the indeterminableness does not occur.; sent23 & int4 -> int5: the cloudiness and the cropping dace happens.; int5 -> int6: the cloudiness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Proustianness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Proustianness happens is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Pasteurianness does not occur if that that the cropping blotter occurs but the recourse does not occur is not false is not true. sent2: the session leads to that the indeterminableness occurs but the cropping dace does not occur. sent3: if the cropping dace does not occur the fact that both the worshipping and the cloudiness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the refreshing happens then the worship occurs. sent5: the cropping dace occurs. sent6: that the manhunt happens is correct if the noncurrentness occurs. sent7: that not the bullshiting Remus but the cropping Sternotherus happens causes that the session occurs. sent8: the Crow does not occur and the hypophysectomy does not occur. sent9: that the cropping dace does not occur is prevented by that the indeterminableness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the Pasteurianness does not occur is correct then the dichotomization does not occur and the ferry does not occur. sent11: the fact that the embarrassment happens and the refreshing occurs does not hold. sent12: the administration does not occur. sent13: that the naught does not occur leads to that either the Finnishness or the filibustering or both happens. sent14: if the fact that the embarrassment occurs and the refreshing does not occur is not correct the worshipping happens. sent15: the cloudiness does not occur if both the worship and the Proustianness occurs. sent16: the Proustianness is triggered by that both the non-cloudiness and the worshipping happens. sent17: the session does not occur. sent18: the Proustianness occurs and the gynecologicalness happens if the worshipping does not occur. sent19: if that the vasotomy does not occur and the rupestralness does not occur is wrong the bullshiting Remus does not occur. sent20: that the embarrassment but not the refreshing happens is incorrect. sent21: the indeterminableness does not occur and the session does not occur. sent22: that the vasotomy does not occur and the rupestralness does not occur does not hold if the ferrying does not occur. sent23: the cloudiness happens and the cropping dace occurs if that the indeterminableness does not occur hold. sent24: the fact that the cropping blotter but not the recourse occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent20 -> int1: that that the worship does not occur is not true is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Proustianness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the worshipping and the Proustianness happens.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: that the cloudiness does not occur hold.; sent21 -> int4: the indeterminableness does not occur.; sent23 & int4 -> int5: the cloudiness and the cropping dace happens.; int5 -> int6: the cloudiness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__