the dispersion does not occur and the integrating Danube happens.
sent1: the mystifying moraine but not the effleurage occurs. sent2: that the dispersion does not occur but the integrating Danube occurs is incorrect if the synergisticness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the Mediterraneanness and the invisibleness happens does not hold if the fact that the appointiveness does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: that the instrumenting submitter does not occur leads to that the integrating Danube and the synergisticness occurs. sent5: the instrumenting submitter does not occur. sent6: if that the instrumenting submitter does not occur and the synergisticness occurs does not hold then the synergisticness does not occur. sent7: the contemptibleness happens. sent8: the appointiveness does not occur. sent9: the Mediterraneanness and the non-visibleness happens if the dispersion happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dispersion occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Mediterranean but not the visibleness happens.; sent3 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the Mediterranean and the invisibleness occurs is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dispersion does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int5: both the integrating Danube and the synergisticness happens.; int5 -> int6: the integrating Danube happens.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that not the dispersion but the integrating Danube occurs does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the dispersion does not occur and the integrating Danube happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the mystifying moraine but not the effleurage occurs. sent2: that the dispersion does not occur but the integrating Danube occurs is incorrect if the synergisticness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the Mediterraneanness and the invisibleness happens does not hold if the fact that the appointiveness does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: that the instrumenting submitter does not occur leads to that the integrating Danube and the synergisticness occurs. sent5: the instrumenting submitter does not occur. sent6: if that the instrumenting submitter does not occur and the synergisticness occurs does not hold then the synergisticness does not occur. sent7: the contemptibleness happens. sent8: the appointiveness does not occur. sent9: the Mediterraneanness and the non-visibleness happens if the dispersion happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dispersion occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Mediterranean but not the visibleness happens.; sent3 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the Mediterranean and the invisibleness occurs is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dispersion does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int5: both the integrating Danube and the synergisticness happens.; int5 -> int6: the integrating Danube happens.; int4 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__