the renter is not a cybercrime but it is a Rhone.
sent1: if the pussycat is not morphophonemic the renter is not a cybercrime. sent2: something is not a kind of a Rhone if that it does dilapidate and it dissociates is not correct. sent3: the abscission is morphophonemic and/or does not palatalize frotteur. sent4: the abscission does not dissociate if the caveman does not dilapidate. sent5: if the caveman is not a giblet then that it is preanal and does dilapidate is not wrong. sent6: the caveman does dilapidate or is a giblet or both. sent7: the abscission does not dissociate if the caveman does not dilapidate and/or it is a giblet. sent8: if the pussycat does not palatalize frotteur then it is not morphophonemic. sent9: the abscission is not a squall if it is morphophonemic and/or does not palatalize frotteur. sent10: if the pussycat is not morphophonemic the renter is not a cybercrime and is a Rhone. sent11: something is not honorable and/or deflowers oxygen if it is not preanal. sent12: there exists something such that it is not preanal. sent13: if there are non-preanal things that either the caveman does not dilapidate or it is a giblet or both is not false. sent14: the renter is not a cybercrime. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not preanal then either the caveman dilapidates or it is a kind of a giblet or both. sent16: if that the abscission does not dissociate hold then the fact that the pussycat squalls and does palatalize frotteur is not right. sent17: something is not morphophonemic if it does not palatalize frotteur. sent18: there is something such that it is preanal.
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the caveman does not dilapidate and/or it is a kind of a giblet.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the abscission does not dissociate.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: that the pussycat does squall and it does palatalize frotteur is incorrect.;
the poetess is not honorable or deflowers oxygen or both.
sent11 -> int4: if the poetess is not preanal then it either is not honorable or does deflower oxygen or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the renter is not a cybercrime but it is a Rhone. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pussycat is not morphophonemic the renter is not a cybercrime. sent2: something is not a kind of a Rhone if that it does dilapidate and it dissociates is not correct. sent3: the abscission is morphophonemic and/or does not palatalize frotteur. sent4: the abscission does not dissociate if the caveman does not dilapidate. sent5: if the caveman is not a giblet then that it is preanal and does dilapidate is not wrong. sent6: the caveman does dilapidate or is a giblet or both. sent7: the abscission does not dissociate if the caveman does not dilapidate and/or it is a giblet. sent8: if the pussycat does not palatalize frotteur then it is not morphophonemic. sent9: the abscission is not a squall if it is morphophonemic and/or does not palatalize frotteur. sent10: if the pussycat is not morphophonemic the renter is not a cybercrime and is a Rhone. sent11: something is not honorable and/or deflowers oxygen if it is not preanal. sent12: there exists something such that it is not preanal. sent13: if there are non-preanal things that either the caveman does not dilapidate or it is a giblet or both is not false. sent14: the renter is not a cybercrime. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not preanal then either the caveman dilapidates or it is a kind of a giblet or both. sent16: if that the abscission does not dissociate hold then the fact that the pussycat squalls and does palatalize frotteur is not right. sent17: something is not morphophonemic if it does not palatalize frotteur. sent18: there is something such that it is preanal. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent13 -> int1: the caveman does not dilapidate and/or it is a kind of a giblet.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the abscission does not dissociate.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: that the pussycat does squall and it does palatalize frotteur is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__