the apneicness occurs.
sent1: the defervescing happens. sent2: the thermalness is triggered by the non-backwardness. sent3: the orthotropousness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the rotary occurs is true. sent5: the inquest does not occur. sent6: the apneicness occurs if the clinching Gambian but not the uncongenialness happens. sent7: that both the moralization and the inhabitancy happens prevents that the backwardness occurs. sent8: if the estimating happens and the clinching bust happens the sidling plainclothesman does not occur. sent9: the hatching cantor and the Commerce happens. sent10: the moralization happens. sent11: both the Beninese and the determination occurs. sent12: both the brightening and the eavesdropping occurs. sent13: that both the non-cyanobacterialness and the monumentalness happens is not right. sent14: the Zambian occurs and the inconsiderableness does not occur. sent15: that the sidling viscounty but not the moderateness occurs results in that the democraticness occurs. sent16: the nonthermalness occurs. sent17: if the brightening does not occur then the nonthermalness occurs and the backwardness occurs. sent18: the clinching industrialism happens. sent19: if that the prejudicialness does not occur and the checkup occurs is false then the checkup does not occur. sent20: the fact that both the drinkableness and the uncongenialness happens is wrong. sent21: the excitation is brought about by that the spelldown and the non-articularness occurs. sent22: the abdominalness does not occur. sent23: the Commerce occurs. sent24: the clinching industrialism and the sidling fatigability occurs. sent25: the prefabrication occurs. sent26: if that the undrinkableness does not occur and the uncongenialness occurs is incorrect then the uncongenialness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inhabitancy occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: both the moralization and the inhabitancy happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the backwardness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the nonthermalness does not occur hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the inhabitancy does not occur.; sent12 -> int6: the brightening happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the brightening but not the inhabitancy happens.; sent26 & sent20 -> int8: that the uncongenialness does not occur is not incorrect.;
the apneicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the apneicness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the defervescing happens. sent2: the thermalness is triggered by the non-backwardness. sent3: the orthotropousness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the rotary occurs is true. sent5: the inquest does not occur. sent6: the apneicness occurs if the clinching Gambian but not the uncongenialness happens. sent7: that both the moralization and the inhabitancy happens prevents that the backwardness occurs. sent8: if the estimating happens and the clinching bust happens the sidling plainclothesman does not occur. sent9: the hatching cantor and the Commerce happens. sent10: the moralization happens. sent11: both the Beninese and the determination occurs. sent12: both the brightening and the eavesdropping occurs. sent13: that both the non-cyanobacterialness and the monumentalness happens is not right. sent14: the Zambian occurs and the inconsiderableness does not occur. sent15: that the sidling viscounty but not the moderateness occurs results in that the democraticness occurs. sent16: the nonthermalness occurs. sent17: if the brightening does not occur then the nonthermalness occurs and the backwardness occurs. sent18: the clinching industrialism happens. sent19: if that the prejudicialness does not occur and the checkup occurs is false then the checkup does not occur. sent20: the fact that both the drinkableness and the uncongenialness happens is wrong. sent21: the excitation is brought about by that the spelldown and the non-articularness occurs. sent22: the abdominalness does not occur. sent23: the Commerce occurs. sent24: the clinching industrialism and the sidling fatigability occurs. sent25: the prefabrication occurs. sent26: if that the undrinkableness does not occur and the uncongenialness occurs is incorrect then the uncongenialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inhabitancy occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: both the moralization and the inhabitancy happens.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the backwardness does not occur.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the nonthermalness does not occur hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the inhabitancy does not occur.; sent12 -> int6: the brightening happens.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the brightening but not the inhabitancy happens.; sent26 & sent20 -> int8: that the uncongenialness does not occur is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__