that the thyronine is a kind of a Episcopalianism hold.
sent1: everything does not prioritize Ahab. sent2: the wilderness is hateful. sent3: if the thyronine does persist Austrian then it is a hyoscyamine. sent4: the fact that something does not lose agora and is not Hebridean is not true if it does not prioritize Ahab. sent5: if the thyronine is not a resilience it is not a kind of a Episcopalianism. sent6: if the thyronine is not a resilience then the fact that the sprocket is a kind of a hyoscyamine that does not persist Austrian is not correct. sent7: The Austrian persists thyronine. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not lose agora and is not Hebridean is incorrect then that the wilderness does not champ is not false. sent9: if the wilderness does not champ the fact that the capsule is a kind of a Illinoisan and it is carbonaceous is incorrect. sent10: the thyronine is a kind of a hyoscyamine or it is a kind of a resilience or both. sent11: the ovolo is a Episcopalianism and not a Philohela if the capsule is not hateful. sent12: the thyronine is not a resilience if the ovolo is a kind of a Episcopalianism but it is not a Philohela. sent13: the monopolist confines freshman and/or it is not an abort. sent14: the thyronine persists Austrian. sent15: if the thyronine is a hyoscyamine and/or not a resilience then it is not a Episcopalianism. sent16: if there are hateful things then the capsule is not a Philohela but it is a resilience.
sent3 & sent14 -> int1: the thyronine is a kind of a hyoscyamine.; int1 -> int2: either the thyronine is a hyoscyamine or it is not a kind of a resilience or both.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the thyronine is a Episcopalianism.
sent2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is hateful.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the capsule is both not a Philohela and a resilience.; int4 -> int5: something is not a Philohela but it is a resilience.;
$hypothesis$ = that the thyronine is a kind of a Episcopalianism hold. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does not prioritize Ahab. sent2: the wilderness is hateful. sent3: if the thyronine does persist Austrian then it is a hyoscyamine. sent4: the fact that something does not lose agora and is not Hebridean is not true if it does not prioritize Ahab. sent5: if the thyronine is not a resilience it is not a kind of a Episcopalianism. sent6: if the thyronine is not a resilience then the fact that the sprocket is a kind of a hyoscyamine that does not persist Austrian is not correct. sent7: The Austrian persists thyronine. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not lose agora and is not Hebridean is incorrect then that the wilderness does not champ is not false. sent9: if the wilderness does not champ the fact that the capsule is a kind of a Illinoisan and it is carbonaceous is incorrect. sent10: the thyronine is a kind of a hyoscyamine or it is a kind of a resilience or both. sent11: the ovolo is a Episcopalianism and not a Philohela if the capsule is not hateful. sent12: the thyronine is not a resilience if the ovolo is a kind of a Episcopalianism but it is not a Philohela. sent13: the monopolist confines freshman and/or it is not an abort. sent14: the thyronine persists Austrian. sent15: if the thyronine is a hyoscyamine and/or not a resilience then it is not a Episcopalianism. sent16: if there are hateful things then the capsule is not a Philohela but it is a resilience. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent14 -> int1: the thyronine is a kind of a hyoscyamine.; int1 -> int2: either the thyronine is a hyoscyamine or it is not a kind of a resilience or both.; int2 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__