the fact that the stipe is pyroelectric is not false.
sent1: there exists nothing such that it is a variation that is a venison. sent2: the footwear is a kind of a Shakespearian. sent3: the stipe is pyroelectric if something that is not a variation is not a mastoid. sent4: the footwear is not non-mastoid if the cruiserweight is not a kind of a variation and it is not postexilic. sent5: the footwear is a mastoid if there exists something such that it is not a variation and it is not a kind of a scholarship. sent6: if the Bengali is a kind of unportable thing that is not a venison then the fact that it is not postexilic hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a scholarship then that the cruiserweight is not a variation is right. sent8: the cruiserweight is not a kind of a variation and it is not a mastoid if something is not a scholarship. sent9: the cruiserweight is not a variation. sent10: the cruiserweight is not a mastoid if that the Junior is a variation and it is postexilic is false. sent11: there is something such that it is not a kind of a variation and it is not pyroelectric. sent12: if the footwear is a mastoid then that the creosote is a Shakespearian but it is not a kind of a scholarship does not hold. sent13: if the footwear is pyroelectric it is not a scholarship. sent14: something is a variation and not mastoid. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of a scholarship. sent16: that the cruiserweight is not a kind of a variation is not false if there is something such that that it is a variation and it is a venison is not true. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a mastoid.
the stipe is not pyroelectric.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stipe is pyroelectric is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists nothing such that it is a variation that is a venison. sent2: the footwear is a kind of a Shakespearian. sent3: the stipe is pyroelectric if something that is not a variation is not a mastoid. sent4: the footwear is not non-mastoid if the cruiserweight is not a kind of a variation and it is not postexilic. sent5: the footwear is a mastoid if there exists something such that it is not a variation and it is not a kind of a scholarship. sent6: if the Bengali is a kind of unportable thing that is not a venison then the fact that it is not postexilic hold. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a scholarship then that the cruiserweight is not a variation is right. sent8: the cruiserweight is not a kind of a variation and it is not a mastoid if something is not a scholarship. sent9: the cruiserweight is not a variation. sent10: the cruiserweight is not a mastoid if that the Junior is a variation and it is postexilic is false. sent11: there is something such that it is not a kind of a variation and it is not pyroelectric. sent12: if the footwear is a mastoid then that the creosote is a Shakespearian but it is not a kind of a scholarship does not hold. sent13: if the footwear is pyroelectric it is not a scholarship. sent14: something is a variation and not mastoid. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of a scholarship. sent16: that the cruiserweight is not a kind of a variation is not false if there is something such that that it is a variation and it is a venison is not true. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a mastoid. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__