the fact that the autograft is not a Hampton but it is papal is not correct.
sent1: if the poser is bacteriophagic the autograft incriminates maestro. sent2: if the fact that something is both not a Poe and not a bend does not hold then it is papal. sent3: the fact that the autograft is a Poe but it does not bend is not correct. sent4: if something is a feminine then it is bacteriophagic. sent5: the poser is a kind of a feminine if it is a kind of a Christology. sent6: the poser is a Christology but it is not pyemic. sent7: if the autograft does incriminate sexagenarian but it is not philosophic it is not a Hampton. sent8: the autograft incriminates sexagenarian. sent9: if the autograft does incriminate maestro then the fact that it is not a Poe and is a bend does not hold. sent10: the autograft incriminates sexagenarian and is not philosophic. sent11: if the autograft incriminates maestro the fact that it is not a kind of a Poe and it is not a kind of a bend is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: the poser is a kind of a Christology.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the poser is a kind of a feminine.; sent4 -> int3: the poser is bacteriophagic if the fact that it is feminine hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the poser is bacteriophagic.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the autograft does incriminate maestro.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: that the autograft is not a Poe and does not bend does not hold.; sent2 -> int7: the autograft is papal if the fact that it is not a Poe and it is not a bend does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the autograft is not non-papal.; sent7 & sent10 -> int9: that the autograft is not a Hampton is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the autograft is not a Hampton but it is papal is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the poser is bacteriophagic the autograft incriminates maestro. sent2: if the fact that something is both not a Poe and not a bend does not hold then it is papal. sent3: the fact that the autograft is a Poe but it does not bend is not correct. sent4: if something is a feminine then it is bacteriophagic. sent5: the poser is a kind of a feminine if it is a kind of a Christology. sent6: the poser is a Christology but it is not pyemic. sent7: if the autograft does incriminate sexagenarian but it is not philosophic it is not a Hampton. sent8: the autograft incriminates sexagenarian. sent9: if the autograft does incriminate maestro then the fact that it is not a Poe and is a bend does not hold. sent10: the autograft incriminates sexagenarian and is not philosophic. sent11: if the autograft incriminates maestro the fact that it is not a kind of a Poe and it is not a kind of a bend is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the poser is a kind of a Christology.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the poser is a kind of a feminine.; sent4 -> int3: the poser is bacteriophagic if the fact that it is feminine hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the poser is bacteriophagic.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the autograft does incriminate maestro.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: that the autograft is not a Poe and does not bend does not hold.; sent2 -> int7: the autograft is papal if the fact that it is not a Poe and it is not a bend does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the autograft is not non-papal.; sent7 & sent10 -> int9: that the autograft is not a Hampton is not incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__