the guyot is germy.
sent1: the fact that the fact that something does not acquaint Nast but it is a kind of a Luvaridae is not right if it is an oxbow is correct. sent2: the guyot is not a gunnery if that the plug-ugly does not acquaint Nast but it is a kind of a Luvaridae is not correct. sent3: if something either is not a kind of a gunnery or does acquaint plug-ugly or both then it is maturational. sent4: everything is an oxbow. sent5: something is a flat if it is maturational. sent6: either the guyot is a gunnery or it acquaints plug-ugly or both. sent7: that something does acquaint major-domo and it is necessary is not correct if it acquaints telegrapher. sent8: something is germy if it is a flat. sent9: the plug-ugly does acquaint plug-ugly if it is a kind of a Luvaridae.
sent1 -> int1: if the plug-ugly is a kind of an oxbow then the fact that it does not acquaint Nast and it is a kind of a Luvaridae is incorrect.; sent4 -> int2: the plug-ugly is a kind of an oxbow.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the plug-ugly does not acquaint Nast and is a kind of a Luvaridae does not hold.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the guyot is not a gunnery.; int4 -> int5: the guyot is not a gunnery and/or acquaints plug-ugly.; sent3 -> int6: if the guyot is not a gunnery and/or it acquaints plug-ugly it is not non-maturational.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the guyot is maturational.; sent5 -> int8: the guyot is flat if the fact that it is maturational is not wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the guyot is a flat.; sent8 -> int10: the guyot is germy if it is a kind of a flat.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the guyot is germy. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that something does not acquaint Nast but it is a kind of a Luvaridae is not right if it is an oxbow is correct. sent2: the guyot is not a gunnery if that the plug-ugly does not acquaint Nast but it is a kind of a Luvaridae is not correct. sent3: if something either is not a kind of a gunnery or does acquaint plug-ugly or both then it is maturational. sent4: everything is an oxbow. sent5: something is a flat if it is maturational. sent6: either the guyot is a gunnery or it acquaints plug-ugly or both. sent7: that something does acquaint major-domo and it is necessary is not correct if it acquaints telegrapher. sent8: something is germy if it is a flat. sent9: the plug-ugly does acquaint plug-ugly if it is a kind of a Luvaridae. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the plug-ugly is a kind of an oxbow then the fact that it does not acquaint Nast and it is a kind of a Luvaridae is incorrect.; sent4 -> int2: the plug-ugly is a kind of an oxbow.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the plug-ugly does not acquaint Nast and is a kind of a Luvaridae does not hold.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the guyot is not a gunnery.; int4 -> int5: the guyot is not a gunnery and/or acquaints plug-ugly.; sent3 -> int6: if the guyot is not a gunnery and/or it acquaints plug-ugly it is not non-maturational.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the guyot is maturational.; sent5 -> int8: the guyot is flat if the fact that it is maturational is not wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the guyot is a flat.; sent8 -> int10: the guyot is germy if it is a kind of a flat.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__