that the knish does not mythicize and it is not an incoordination is not true.
sent1: there is something such that it is not non-carbocyclic. sent2: that the oceanfront does not mythicize is not incorrect. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it mythicizes and it is not a ICBM is wrong then the knish does not mythicizes. sent4: the lyssavirus mythicizes if there exists something such that it is uncreative. sent5: if there is something such that it is carbocyclic then the dragnet is an answer. sent6: the sightreader is uncreative if the chylomicron is Aboriginal. sent7: the knish is not an incoordination if that it is an incoordination that does not mythicize does not hold. sent8: the fact that the knish does not mythicize and is not an incoordination is false if it is a ICBM. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a fecula that the oceanfront is both not a fecula and not a ICBM does not hold. sent10: the oceanfront is a songster. sent11: if there exists something such that it is endoscopic that the oceanfront mythicizes and is not a kind of a ICBM is wrong. sent12: if the oceanfront is not a kind of a songster and/or does move theogony it is not endoscopic. sent13: that the knish mythicizes and is not an incoordination does not hold. sent14: the oceanfront is endoscopic. sent15: the fact that the knish is a ICBM hold if the fact that the fact that the oceanfront is a songster or it does move theogony or both is not incorrect does not hold. sent16: the fact that the lyssavirus is endoscopic is correct. sent17: if something is not an incoordination that it is a fecula and is endoscopic hold. sent18: the fact that the adsorption does not dissociate karyolymph and is not an incoordination is not right. sent19: the myrmidon is terrestrial if the dragnet is an answer. sent20: if the myrmidon is terrestrial the fact that the chylomicron is not Aboriginal is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oceanfront is not a kind of a songster or it moves theogony or both.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the oceanfront is non-endoscopic is not wrong.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that either the oceanfront is not a songster or it moves theogony or both is not correct.;
the knish does not mythicize and it is not an incoordination.
sent16 -> int4: something is endoscopic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: that the oceanfront mythicizes and is not a kind of a ICBM is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it mythicizes and it is not a ICBM is false.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the knish does not mythicize.;
$hypothesis$ = that the knish does not mythicize and it is not an incoordination is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it is not non-carbocyclic. sent2: that the oceanfront does not mythicize is not incorrect. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it mythicizes and it is not a ICBM is wrong then the knish does not mythicizes. sent4: the lyssavirus mythicizes if there exists something such that it is uncreative. sent5: if there is something such that it is carbocyclic then the dragnet is an answer. sent6: the sightreader is uncreative if the chylomicron is Aboriginal. sent7: the knish is not an incoordination if that it is an incoordination that does not mythicize does not hold. sent8: the fact that the knish does not mythicize and is not an incoordination is false if it is a ICBM. sent9: if there exists something such that it is a fecula that the oceanfront is both not a fecula and not a ICBM does not hold. sent10: the oceanfront is a songster. sent11: if there exists something such that it is endoscopic that the oceanfront mythicizes and is not a kind of a ICBM is wrong. sent12: if the oceanfront is not a kind of a songster and/or does move theogony it is not endoscopic. sent13: that the knish mythicizes and is not an incoordination does not hold. sent14: the oceanfront is endoscopic. sent15: the fact that the knish is a ICBM hold if the fact that the fact that the oceanfront is a songster or it does move theogony or both is not incorrect does not hold. sent16: the fact that the lyssavirus is endoscopic is correct. sent17: if something is not an incoordination that it is a fecula and is endoscopic hold. sent18: the fact that the adsorption does not dissociate karyolymph and is not an incoordination is not right. sent19: the myrmidon is terrestrial if the dragnet is an answer. sent20: if the myrmidon is terrestrial the fact that the chylomicron is not Aboriginal is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oceanfront is not a kind of a songster or it moves theogony or both.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the oceanfront is non-endoscopic is not wrong.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that either the oceanfront is not a songster or it moves theogony or both is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__