the ossification is not a framework.
sent1: the ossification is not a kind of a framework if it is a twitch and it is a measure. sent2: if the seafood is not an orderly then that it is radial-ply thing that leaches lammergeier is wrong. sent3: something that is unselfish is disorderly. sent4: the fact that the pilus does not multiply pressing and is a MPEG is not right. sent5: the pilus is both a animateness and unselfish if it is not gastroduodenal. sent6: the ossification is both a framework and a measure if the chromite is not a twitch. sent7: the ossification does measure if that the sonneteer is monochromatic but it is not unmalicious is not correct. sent8: if that something does not multiply pressing but it is a kind of a MPEG is not right then it is not gastroduodenal. sent9: the fact that the seafood is not an orderly is not wrong if the pilus is not a kind of an orderly. sent10: the fact that the chromite is not radial-ply and is not a kind of a twitch is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the chromite is both not radial-ply and not a twitch is not true the ossification does twitch. sent12: if the sonneteer is unmalicious then the ossification is a kind of a measure. sent13: the fact that the sonneteer is monochromatic and unmalicious is not true.
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the ossification is a twitch.;
the ossification is a kind of a framework.
sent3 -> int2: the pilus is not an orderly if it is unselfish.; sent8 -> int3: if that the pilus does not multiply pressing but it is a MPEG is incorrect then it is non-gastroduodenal.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the pilus is not gastroduodenal.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the pilus is a kind of a animateness and it is unselfish.; int5 -> int6: the pilus is unselfish.; int2 & int6 -> int7: the pilus is not an orderly.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the seafood is not orderly.; sent2 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the seafood is radial-ply and it does leach lammergeier is incorrect.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is radial-ply and does leach lammergeier is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the ossification is not a framework. ; $context$ = sent1: the ossification is not a kind of a framework if it is a twitch and it is a measure. sent2: if the seafood is not an orderly then that it is radial-ply thing that leaches lammergeier is wrong. sent3: something that is unselfish is disorderly. sent4: the fact that the pilus does not multiply pressing and is a MPEG is not right. sent5: the pilus is both a animateness and unselfish if it is not gastroduodenal. sent6: the ossification is both a framework and a measure if the chromite is not a twitch. sent7: the ossification does measure if that the sonneteer is monochromatic but it is not unmalicious is not correct. sent8: if that something does not multiply pressing but it is a kind of a MPEG is not right then it is not gastroduodenal. sent9: the fact that the seafood is not an orderly is not wrong if the pilus is not a kind of an orderly. sent10: the fact that the chromite is not radial-ply and is not a kind of a twitch is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the chromite is both not radial-ply and not a twitch is not true the ossification does twitch. sent12: if the sonneteer is unmalicious then the ossification is a kind of a measure. sent13: the fact that the sonneteer is monochromatic and unmalicious is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent10 -> int1: the ossification is a twitch.; __UNKNOWN__