the dimethylglyoxime is a financing.
sent1: if something is Andalusian that it is not a kind of a rappee and is limbic is not true. sent2: if the sociopath is a backpacker then the inositol does not nurse one-quintillionth. sent3: if that the sociopath does not nurse one-quintillionth and is not a kind of a backpacker is false then the inositol does not nurse one-quintillionth. sent4: that the sociopath does not nurse one-quintillionth and is not a kind of a backpacker does not hold. sent5: the fact that the inositol is a rappee that is limbic is false. sent6: the inositol is Andalusian if the rheumatic is a bethel. sent7: if that something is not a rappee but limbic does not hold it nurses one-quintillionth. sent8: if there are non-Andalusian things the inositol is a backpacker that is a bethel. sent9: something that is not a kind of a bethel and overprints hesitation is a financing. sent10: the inositol does not overprint hesitation. sent11: the fact that the rheumatic is Andalusian and is non-limbic is incorrect if it is not a rappee. sent12: if the rheumatic is not a kind of a bethel then the dimethylglyoxime is not a kind of a bethel and overprints hesitation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rheumatic is a bethel.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the inositol is Andalusian.; sent1 -> int2: if the inositol is Andalusian the fact that it is not a kind of a rappee and it is limbic is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the inositol is not a rappee but it is limbic is false.; sent7 -> int4: the inositol nurses one-quintillionth if that it is not a rappee and is limbic does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inositol nurses one-quintillionth.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the inositol does not nurse one-quintillionth.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rheumatic is not a kind of a bethel.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the dimethylglyoxime is not a kind of a bethel and overprints hesitation.; sent9 -> int10: if the dimethylglyoxime is not a bethel but it overprints hesitation it is a kind of a financing.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dimethylglyoxime is not a financing is true.
$hypothesis$ = the dimethylglyoxime is a financing. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is Andalusian that it is not a kind of a rappee and is limbic is not true. sent2: if the sociopath is a backpacker then the inositol does not nurse one-quintillionth. sent3: if that the sociopath does not nurse one-quintillionth and is not a kind of a backpacker is false then the inositol does not nurse one-quintillionth. sent4: that the sociopath does not nurse one-quintillionth and is not a kind of a backpacker does not hold. sent5: the fact that the inositol is a rappee that is limbic is false. sent6: the inositol is Andalusian if the rheumatic is a bethel. sent7: if that something is not a rappee but limbic does not hold it nurses one-quintillionth. sent8: if there are non-Andalusian things the inositol is a backpacker that is a bethel. sent9: something that is not a kind of a bethel and overprints hesitation is a financing. sent10: the inositol does not overprint hesitation. sent11: the fact that the rheumatic is Andalusian and is non-limbic is incorrect if it is not a rappee. sent12: if the rheumatic is not a kind of a bethel then the dimethylglyoxime is not a kind of a bethel and overprints hesitation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rheumatic is a bethel.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the inositol is Andalusian.; sent1 -> int2: if the inositol is Andalusian the fact that it is not a kind of a rappee and it is limbic is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the inositol is not a rappee but it is limbic is false.; sent7 -> int4: the inositol nurses one-quintillionth if that it is not a rappee and is limbic does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inositol nurses one-quintillionth.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the inositol does not nurse one-quintillionth.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the rheumatic is not a kind of a bethel.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the dimethylglyoxime is not a kind of a bethel and overprints hesitation.; sent9 -> int10: if the dimethylglyoxime is not a bethel but it overprints hesitation it is a kind of a financing.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__