the package is an audit.
sent1: the Wesleyan is not a kind of a Essex. sent2: the fact that the Wesleyan does not thrombose Xenosaurus hold. sent3: the fact that the Akwa'ala does not demoralize and it does not thrombose Xenosaurus is not right. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that it is a kind of non-photoelectric thing that does not audit is not false. sent5: The fact that the Xenosaurus does not thrombose Wesleyan hold. sent6: the Akwa'ala is not a leftover. sent7: the Wesleyan is not photoelectric if it is biologistic and does not demoralize. sent8: if there are reliable things then that the Akwa'ala is photoelectric and does not demoralize is not true. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Garand and it is not anisometropic. sent10: if something is not unreliable then that the Akwa'ala is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize does not hold. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it does not thrombose Xenosaurus and it is not a Essex is not correct. sent12: the Wesleyan is a Essex if it is a kind of unreliable thing that does not thrombose Xenosaurus. sent13: if there is something such that it does not thrombose Xenosaurus that the Wesleyan is a Essex but it is not unreliable is not correct. sent14: the package is not a Essex. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not photoelectric that the Akwa'ala is not a kind of a Essex and does not demoralize is incorrect. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize is not true the package is not a kind of an audit. sent17: the package is unreliable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Wesleyan is unreliable.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the Wesleyan is unreliable but it does not thrombose Xenosaurus.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Wesleyan is a Essex.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Wesleyan is not unreliable.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not unreliable.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the Akwa'ala is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize is true is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize is not correct.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the package is an audit.
$hypothesis$ = the package is an audit. ; $context$ = sent1: the Wesleyan is not a kind of a Essex. sent2: the fact that the Wesleyan does not thrombose Xenosaurus hold. sent3: the fact that the Akwa'ala does not demoralize and it does not thrombose Xenosaurus is not right. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that it is a kind of non-photoelectric thing that does not audit is not false. sent5: The fact that the Xenosaurus does not thrombose Wesleyan hold. sent6: the Akwa'ala is not a leftover. sent7: the Wesleyan is not photoelectric if it is biologistic and does not demoralize. sent8: if there are reliable things then that the Akwa'ala is photoelectric and does not demoralize is not true. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Garand and it is not anisometropic. sent10: if something is not unreliable then that the Akwa'ala is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize does not hold. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it does not thrombose Xenosaurus and it is not a Essex is not correct. sent12: the Wesleyan is a Essex if it is a kind of unreliable thing that does not thrombose Xenosaurus. sent13: if there is something such that it does not thrombose Xenosaurus that the Wesleyan is a Essex but it is not unreliable is not correct. sent14: the package is not a Essex. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not photoelectric that the Akwa'ala is not a kind of a Essex and does not demoralize is incorrect. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize is not true the package is not a kind of an audit. sent17: the package is unreliable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Wesleyan is unreliable.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: the Wesleyan is unreliable but it does not thrombose Xenosaurus.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the Wesleyan is a Essex.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Wesleyan is not unreliable.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not unreliable.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the Akwa'ala is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize is true is not correct.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it is not photoelectric and it does not demoralize is not correct.; int7 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__