the fact that either the blastema does not sicken dry or it is pyrochemical or both is not true.
sent1: if that the wineglass is not a keratoacanthoma is not incorrect the blastema does sicken dry and/or it is pyrochemical. sent2: the wineglass is a hitch. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a combustion then the fact that the transponder is not an inaugural but it blanches is not right. sent4: the wineglass is meaningless. sent5: something is a alienist and does not suborn evangelicalism. sent6: the wineglass is not a hitch if it does sicken dry and is meaningless. sent7: the Quechua is a lymphangiography. sent8: the blastema is not pyrochemical and/or it is meaningless if the wineglass is not a kind of a hitch. sent9: the winner is not a combustion if something that is a lymphangiography images. sent10: if something does not sicken cytophotometry the fact that it is a kind of a keratoacanthoma that is pyrochemical is not true. sent11: the blastema either does not sicken dry or is pyrochemical or both if the wineglass is not a kind of a keratoacanthoma. sent12: the blastema is not a keratoacanthoma if the fact that the hansom is a keratoacanthoma and is pyrochemical is false. sent13: the Quechua is an imaging if something that is a alienist does not suborn evangelicalism. sent14: something is not a keratoacanthoma if that it does not sicken cytophotometry and it is a kind of a keratoacanthoma is incorrect. sent15: if a meaningless thing hitches it is not a keratoacanthoma. sent16: something does not sicken dry if that it is both not a hitch and not meaningless is false. sent17: the hansom does not sicken cytophotometry if there is something such that that it is not an inaugural and does blanch is not correct. sent18: the blastema is not meaningless. sent19: if something is not a keratoacanthoma then the fact that the wineglass does not hitch and it is not meaningless is incorrect. sent20: the blastema sickens dry or it is pyrochemical or both.
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the wineglass is meaningless and it is a kind of a hitch.; sent15 -> int2: the wineglass is not a keratoacanthoma if the fact that it is a kind of meaningless thing that is a kind of a hitch hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wineglass is not a keratoacanthoma.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the blastema does not sicken dry or it is pyrochemical or both is incorrect.
sent14 -> int4: the blastema is not a keratoacanthoma if that it does not sicken cytophotometry and it is a keratoacanthoma is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the blastema does not sicken dry or it is pyrochemical or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the wineglass is not a keratoacanthoma is not incorrect the blastema does sicken dry and/or it is pyrochemical. sent2: the wineglass is a hitch. sent3: if there exists something such that it is not a combustion then the fact that the transponder is not an inaugural but it blanches is not right. sent4: the wineglass is meaningless. sent5: something is a alienist and does not suborn evangelicalism. sent6: the wineglass is not a hitch if it does sicken dry and is meaningless. sent7: the Quechua is a lymphangiography. sent8: the blastema is not pyrochemical and/or it is meaningless if the wineglass is not a kind of a hitch. sent9: the winner is not a combustion if something that is a lymphangiography images. sent10: if something does not sicken cytophotometry the fact that it is a kind of a keratoacanthoma that is pyrochemical is not true. sent11: the blastema either does not sicken dry or is pyrochemical or both if the wineglass is not a kind of a keratoacanthoma. sent12: the blastema is not a keratoacanthoma if the fact that the hansom is a keratoacanthoma and is pyrochemical is false. sent13: the Quechua is an imaging if something that is a alienist does not suborn evangelicalism. sent14: something is not a keratoacanthoma if that it does not sicken cytophotometry and it is a kind of a keratoacanthoma is incorrect. sent15: if a meaningless thing hitches it is not a keratoacanthoma. sent16: something does not sicken dry if that it is both not a hitch and not meaningless is false. sent17: the hansom does not sicken cytophotometry if there is something such that that it is not an inaugural and does blanch is not correct. sent18: the blastema is not meaningless. sent19: if something is not a keratoacanthoma then the fact that the wineglass does not hitch and it is not meaningless is incorrect. sent20: the blastema sickens dry or it is pyrochemical or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent2 -> int1: the wineglass is meaningless and it is a kind of a hitch.; sent15 -> int2: the wineglass is not a keratoacanthoma if the fact that it is a kind of meaningless thing that is a kind of a hitch hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wineglass is not a keratoacanthoma.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__