the fact that the Madagascanness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur hold.
sent1: the judging ordered and the extending occurs. sent2: the disreputableness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the Madagascanness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur is incorrect if the charming atavism does not occur. sent4: the Madagascan and the non-orthographicness happens if the charming atavism does not occur. sent5: the avifaunalness and the angiocarpicness happens if the cuddling does not occur. sent6: that not the ricing extraversion but the intercourse happens leads to that the charming atavism occurs. sent7: the ricing extraversion does not occur and the intercourse occurs. sent8: the resident does not occur. sent9: the cuddling does not occur. sent10: that the disreputableness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur is triggered by that the residentness does not occur.
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the charming atavism happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Madagascan occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the charming atavism and the Madagascan happens.; sent5 & sent9 -> int3: the avifaunalness happens and the angiocarpicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the avifaunalness occurs.; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: the disreputableness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the charming rogue does not occur.;
the fact that not the orthographicness but the instrumentation happens is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Madagascanness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the judging ordered and the extending occurs. sent2: the disreputableness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the Madagascanness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur is incorrect if the charming atavism does not occur. sent4: the Madagascan and the non-orthographicness happens if the charming atavism does not occur. sent5: the avifaunalness and the angiocarpicness happens if the cuddling does not occur. sent6: that not the ricing extraversion but the intercourse happens leads to that the charming atavism occurs. sent7: the ricing extraversion does not occur and the intercourse occurs. sent8: the resident does not occur. sent9: the cuddling does not occur. sent10: that the disreputableness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur is triggered by that the residentness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent7 -> int1: the charming atavism happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Madagascan occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the charming atavism and the Madagascan happens.; sent5 & sent9 -> int3: the avifaunalness happens and the angiocarpicness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the avifaunalness occurs.; sent10 & sent8 -> int5: the disreputableness does not occur and the charming rogue does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the charming rogue does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__