that both the non-extricableness and the non-retrogradeness happens is not right.
sent1: if the Epiphany happens that the inextricableness and the non-retrogradeness occurs is not correct. sent2: if the gardening occurs then the dressage happens. sent3: that the blunder occurs and the spraying Malthusianism occurs is not correct if the gardening does not occur. sent4: that the abstractness happens is caused by that the plunderage happens. sent5: the accomplishing does not occur if the fact that both the blunder and the spraying Malthusianism occurs is incorrect. sent6: the range does not occur and the dressage does not occur. sent7: if the apposition occurs that the catabolicness does not occur and the condonation happens does not hold. sent8: if that the schizoidness occurs but the mass-producing teratology does not occur is false the Epiphany occurs. sent9: the fact that the schizoidness but not the mass-producing teratology occurs does not hold if the accomplishing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gardening occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the dressage occurs.; sent6 -> int2: the dressage does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gardening does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the blunder happens and the spraying Malthusianism happens is not correct.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the accomplishing does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the schizoidness happens and the mass-producing teratology does not occur is false.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the Epiphany occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the non-extricableness and the non-retrogradeness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Epiphany happens that the inextricableness and the non-retrogradeness occurs is not correct. sent2: if the gardening occurs then the dressage happens. sent3: that the blunder occurs and the spraying Malthusianism occurs is not correct if the gardening does not occur. sent4: that the abstractness happens is caused by that the plunderage happens. sent5: the accomplishing does not occur if the fact that both the blunder and the spraying Malthusianism occurs is incorrect. sent6: the range does not occur and the dressage does not occur. sent7: if the apposition occurs that the catabolicness does not occur and the condonation happens does not hold. sent8: if that the schizoidness occurs but the mass-producing teratology does not occur is false the Epiphany occurs. sent9: the fact that the schizoidness but not the mass-producing teratology occurs does not hold if the accomplishing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gardening occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the dressage occurs.; sent6 -> int2: the dressage does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the gardening does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the blunder happens and the spraying Malthusianism happens is not correct.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the accomplishing does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the schizoidness happens and the mass-producing teratology does not occur is false.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the Epiphany occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__