the fact that the tailcoat is not basaltic is true.
sent1: the fact that the backscratcher is a pawnbroker but it is not a kind of a waddler is false. sent2: if the fact that something does melanize tailcoat and does not repine Taricha is not correct then the fact that it does not melanize tailcoat is right. sent3: if something that salts does not melanize tailcoat then it is not basaltic. sent4: there exists nothing that melanizes tailcoat and does not repine Taricha.
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pawnbroker and it is not a kind of a waddler is not true.; sent2 -> int2: the tailcoat does not melanize tailcoat if that it melanize tailcoat and it does not repine Taricha is wrong.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the tailcoat melanizes tailcoat and does not repine Taricha is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tailcoat does not melanize tailcoat.; sent3 -> int5: the tailcoat is not basaltic if it is a salt that does not melanize tailcoat.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tailcoat is not basaltic is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the backscratcher is a pawnbroker but it is not a kind of a waddler is false. sent2: if the fact that something does melanize tailcoat and does not repine Taricha is not correct then the fact that it does not melanize tailcoat is right. sent3: if something that salts does not melanize tailcoat then it is not basaltic. sent4: there exists nothing that melanizes tailcoat and does not repine Taricha. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a pawnbroker and it is not a kind of a waddler is not true.; sent2 -> int2: the tailcoat does not melanize tailcoat if that it melanize tailcoat and it does not repine Taricha is wrong.; sent4 -> int3: the fact that the tailcoat melanizes tailcoat and does not repine Taricha is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the tailcoat does not melanize tailcoat.; sent3 -> int5: the tailcoat is not basaltic if it is a salt that does not melanize tailcoat.; __UNKNOWN__