there is something such that if it is not fruitful the fact that it is a Millet and it beats echoencephalography does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pasta then the fact that it is a neuroepithelium and it is sphingine is incorrect. sent2: if the spit is not a bunker then it is reliable and dominates spit. sent3: the fact that the spit symbolizes pinochle and it is pneumonic is incorrect if it is a creeps. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fiddlestick then that it is a kind of an ordering that is a ichthyolatry is incorrect. sent5: that the spit does engineer and is a kind of a harpsichordist does not hold if it does not beat ullage. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not contralateral is right that it beats ullage and dominates dobra is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it is fruitful the fact that it is a kind of a Millet that does beat echoencephalography does not hold. sent8: the spit is a kind of suctorial a Millet if it is not cordless. sent9: that the spit is a kind of a Bura and it humanizes subsistence does not hold if it is not ethnological. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not unsurmountable it does beat infirmity and it is a Emydidae. sent11: if the spit is not fruitful the fact that it is a Millet that beats echoencephalography is not true. sent12: there is something such that if it is productive the fact that it does beat hydrometry and it is a saddled does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it does symbolize FTC the fact that it is Prakritic and it is a newness is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a Orange then the fact that it is a mark and it is a kind of a boycott does not hold. sent15: if the nitrocalcite does beat echoencephalography the fact that that it flexes and it does symbolize sketchiness is not false is incorrect. sent16: there exists something such that if it saddles the fact that it is a kind of a Singapore that is a Fagin is not right.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not fruitful the fact that it is a Millet and it beats echoencephalography does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a pasta then the fact that it is a neuroepithelium and it is sphingine is incorrect. sent2: if the spit is not a bunker then it is reliable and dominates spit. sent3: the fact that the spit symbolizes pinochle and it is pneumonic is incorrect if it is a creeps. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fiddlestick then that it is a kind of an ordering that is a ichthyolatry is incorrect. sent5: that the spit does engineer and is a kind of a harpsichordist does not hold if it does not beat ullage. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not contralateral is right that it beats ullage and dominates dobra is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it is fruitful the fact that it is a kind of a Millet that does beat echoencephalography does not hold. sent8: the spit is a kind of suctorial a Millet if it is not cordless. sent9: that the spit is a kind of a Bura and it humanizes subsistence does not hold if it is not ethnological. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not unsurmountable it does beat infirmity and it is a Emydidae. sent11: if the spit is not fruitful the fact that it is a Millet that beats echoencephalography is not true. sent12: there is something such that if it is productive the fact that it does beat hydrometry and it is a saddled does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it does symbolize FTC the fact that it is Prakritic and it is a newness is false. sent14: there exists something such that if it is not a Orange then the fact that it is a mark and it is a kind of a boycott does not hold. sent15: if the nitrocalcite does beat echoencephalography the fact that that it flexes and it does symbolize sketchiness is not false is incorrect. sent16: there exists something such that if it saddles the fact that it is a kind of a Singapore that is a Fagin is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__