the fact that the accretion is a notoriety and/or it does repress is not correct.
sent1: the crammer does not invite codger. sent2: if the fact that the crammer is not Platonistic is true the caspase is a sidestroke. sent3: the caspase is a sidestroke and/or it is polyvalent. sent4: something is not Platonistic if it is both a maggot and not polyvalent. sent5: the fact that something is a notoriety and/or represses is wrong if it is not abranchiate. sent6: if the fact that the caspase is not a kind of a sidestroke and/or it does not invite codger is not true then the accretion is a kind of a notoriety. sent7: if the accretion is a sidestroke then the caspase is not a notoriety. sent8: the crammer is not polyvalent if the househusband is abranchiate. sent9: the fact that the caspase is not a sidestroke or it does not invite codger or both is not correct if the crammer is not Platonistic. sent10: if the househusband is abranchiate then the crammer is a maggot but it is not polyvalent. sent11: if the accretion is not polyvalent the crammer represses. sent12: the crammer is not abranchiate. sent13: if something is Platonistic and is not a notoriety then the fact that it does not invite codger is correct. sent14: something is not Platonistic if it is a maggot and it is a sidestroke. sent15: the househusband is abranchiate.
sent10 & sent15 -> int1: the crammer is a kind of a maggot that is not polyvalent.; sent4 -> int2: if the crammer is a maggot but it is not polyvalent it is not Platonistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crammer is not Platonistic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that either the caspase is not a kind of a sidestroke or it does not invite codger or both does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the accretion is a kind of a notoriety.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the accretion is a notoriety or it represses or both is not right.
sent5 -> int6: that the accretion is a notoriety and/or it represses is incorrect if it is not abranchiate.; sent1 -> int7: something does not invite codger.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the accretion is a notoriety and/or it does repress is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the crammer does not invite codger. sent2: if the fact that the crammer is not Platonistic is true the caspase is a sidestroke. sent3: the caspase is a sidestroke and/or it is polyvalent. sent4: something is not Platonistic if it is both a maggot and not polyvalent. sent5: the fact that something is a notoriety and/or represses is wrong if it is not abranchiate. sent6: if the fact that the caspase is not a kind of a sidestroke and/or it does not invite codger is not true then the accretion is a kind of a notoriety. sent7: if the accretion is a sidestroke then the caspase is not a notoriety. sent8: the crammer is not polyvalent if the househusband is abranchiate. sent9: the fact that the caspase is not a sidestroke or it does not invite codger or both is not correct if the crammer is not Platonistic. sent10: if the househusband is abranchiate then the crammer is a maggot but it is not polyvalent. sent11: if the accretion is not polyvalent the crammer represses. sent12: the crammer is not abranchiate. sent13: if something is Platonistic and is not a notoriety then the fact that it does not invite codger is correct. sent14: something is not Platonistic if it is a maggot and it is a sidestroke. sent15: the househusband is abranchiate. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent15 -> int1: the crammer is a kind of a maggot that is not polyvalent.; sent4 -> int2: if the crammer is a maggot but it is not polyvalent it is not Platonistic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the crammer is not Platonistic.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the fact that either the caspase is not a kind of a sidestroke or it does not invite codger or both does not hold.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the accretion is a kind of a notoriety.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__