the sweetsop rendezvous amateur and it is a Gnostic.
sent1: if something does lunge the northland lunge and/or it does rendezvous white. sent2: the sweetsop is a Gnostic if the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur. sent3: if the fact that the northland lunges is true the fact that the ethyl lunges is not incorrect. sent4: the Shawnee is stemmatic. sent5: something is a kind of a SAM if it is a Ardisia. sent6: if the sweetsop is not a Ardisia then the lackey is a SAM. sent7: if the lackey does not rendezvous amateur the ethyl is a Ardisia. sent8: if the ethyl is a lunge and it is a Ardisia then the lackey does not pleach unpleasingness. sent9: if the fact that the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur hold then the sweetsop rendezvous amateur and is a Gnostic. sent10: if something renders Erythrocebus and pleaches unpleasingness then that it is not a SAM hold. sent11: the thaw rendezvous flip-flop. sent12: if the sweetsop does render Erythrocebus and it does rendezvous amateur then it is not a Ardisia. sent13: something renders Erythrocebus or is a SAM or both if it does not pleach unpleasingness. sent14: the lackey is a Ardisia and it does rendezvous amateur if the ethyl is not a Ardisia. sent15: the lackey is a Ardisia if it is not a lunge. sent16: the sweetsop is a kind of a Gnostic. sent17: The unpleasingness pleaches lackey. sent18: the sweetsop does not render Erythrocebus. sent19: the lackey pleaches unpleasingness. sent20: the lackey does not lunge. sent21: if the fact that the yak does not render terebinth and is not a sponge is not correct then the bobby is a lunge. sent22: a polysomy does bulwark. sent23: if the lackey renders Erythrocebus the sweetsop does not renders Erythrocebus. sent24: something does not pleach wadi if it is a kind of an oligopoly and it does dun speech. sent25: the fact that if the Shawnee is not non-stemmatic then the fact that the ethyl is not non-analogous but it is not a pestle does not hold is right. sent26: something is a Ardisia if the fact that it is a kind of analogous thing that is not a pestle is incorrect. sent27: the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur if the lackey does not render Erythrocebus. sent28: the fact that the yak does not render terebinth and it does not sponge is wrong if there is something such that it rendezvous flip-flop.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lackey renders Erythrocebus.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the lackey does render Erythrocebus and pleaches unpleasingness.; sent10 -> int2: the lackey is not a kind of a SAM if it does render Erythrocebus and it does pleach unpleasingness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lackey is not a kind of a SAM.; sent5 -> int4: if the lackey is a Ardisia then it is a SAM.; sent15 & sent20 -> int5: the lackey is a kind of a Ardisia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lackey is a kind of a SAM.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the lackey does not render Erythrocebus.; int8 & sent27 -> int9: the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the sweetsop does rendezvous amateur and is a kind of a Gnostic is incorrect.
sent13 -> int10: if the lackey does not pleach unpleasingness then it renders Erythrocebus and/or it is a SAM.; sent11 -> int11: there exists something such that it does rendezvous flip-flop.; int11 & sent28 -> int12: the fact that the yak does not render terebinth and is not a sponge does not hold.; sent21 & int12 -> int13: the bobby is a lunge.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it lunges.; int14 & sent1 -> int15: the northland is a lunge or it rendezvous white or both.; sent26 -> int16: if that the ethyl is analogous but it is not a pestle does not hold it is a kind of a Ardisia.; sent25 & sent4 -> int17: that the ethyl is a kind of analogous thing that does not pestle is false.; int16 & int17 -> int18: the ethyl is a Ardisia.;
$hypothesis$ = the sweetsop rendezvous amateur and it is a Gnostic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does lunge the northland lunge and/or it does rendezvous white. sent2: the sweetsop is a Gnostic if the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur. sent3: if the fact that the northland lunges is true the fact that the ethyl lunges is not incorrect. sent4: the Shawnee is stemmatic. sent5: something is a kind of a SAM if it is a Ardisia. sent6: if the sweetsop is not a Ardisia then the lackey is a SAM. sent7: if the lackey does not rendezvous amateur the ethyl is a Ardisia. sent8: if the ethyl is a lunge and it is a Ardisia then the lackey does not pleach unpleasingness. sent9: if the fact that the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur hold then the sweetsop rendezvous amateur and is a Gnostic. sent10: if something renders Erythrocebus and pleaches unpleasingness then that it is not a SAM hold. sent11: the thaw rendezvous flip-flop. sent12: if the sweetsop does render Erythrocebus and it does rendezvous amateur then it is not a Ardisia. sent13: something renders Erythrocebus or is a SAM or both if it does not pleach unpleasingness. sent14: the lackey is a Ardisia and it does rendezvous amateur if the ethyl is not a Ardisia. sent15: the lackey is a Ardisia if it is not a lunge. sent16: the sweetsop is a kind of a Gnostic. sent17: The unpleasingness pleaches lackey. sent18: the sweetsop does not render Erythrocebus. sent19: the lackey pleaches unpleasingness. sent20: the lackey does not lunge. sent21: if the fact that the yak does not render terebinth and is not a sponge is not correct then the bobby is a lunge. sent22: a polysomy does bulwark. sent23: if the lackey renders Erythrocebus the sweetsop does not renders Erythrocebus. sent24: something does not pleach wadi if it is a kind of an oligopoly and it does dun speech. sent25: the fact that if the Shawnee is not non-stemmatic then the fact that the ethyl is not non-analogous but it is not a pestle does not hold is right. sent26: something is a Ardisia if the fact that it is a kind of analogous thing that is not a pestle is incorrect. sent27: the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur if the lackey does not render Erythrocebus. sent28: the fact that the yak does not render terebinth and it does not sponge is wrong if there is something such that it rendezvous flip-flop. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lackey renders Erythrocebus.; assump1 & sent19 -> int1: the lackey does render Erythrocebus and pleaches unpleasingness.; sent10 -> int2: the lackey is not a kind of a SAM if it does render Erythrocebus and it does pleach unpleasingness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lackey is not a kind of a SAM.; sent5 -> int4: if the lackey is a Ardisia then it is a SAM.; sent15 & sent20 -> int5: the lackey is a kind of a Ardisia.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lackey is a kind of a SAM.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the lackey does not render Erythrocebus.; int8 & sent27 -> int9: the ethyl does not rendezvous amateur.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__