the nitrile is not non-ovine.
sent1: if something is a kind of a sensing then it is not ovine. sent2: the coelacanth is ovine. sent3: the nitrile is a nonattendance and it is a Kabul. sent4: if the nitrile does sense it is not ovine. sent5: if something is a sensing and/or is a kind of a nonattendance it is not ovine. sent6: the lambskin is a linendraper. sent7: if the coelacanth does not accouter nitrile then the nitrile is a Kabul and it is a sensing. sent8: if something accouters nitrile that it is a nonattendance that is not a Kabul is not right. sent9: everything repots eagerness and accouters nitrile. sent10: the animalization is not ovine. sent11: if the fact that something is a nonattendance but it is not ovine is incorrect then it is ovine. sent12: if something is a linendraper then it repots eagerness and it is not a kind of a mambo. sent13: if the fact that the nitrile is both a nonattendance and not a Kabul is not correct then the supernumerary is mealy.
sent3 -> int1: the nitrile is a nonattendance.; int1 -> int2: either the nitrile does sense or it is a nonattendance or both.; sent5 -> int3: the nitrile is not ovine if it senses and/or it is a nonattendance.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the supernumerary senses and it is mealy.
sent9 -> int4: the lambskin does repot eagerness and it accouters nitrile.; int4 -> int5: the lambskin does accouter nitrile.; sent8 -> int6: that the lambskin is a kind of a nonattendance but it is not a Kabul is not true if it accouters nitrile.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the lambskin is a kind of a nonattendance but it is not a Kabul does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there is nothing such that it is a nonattendance and it is not a Kabul.; int8 -> int9: the fact that the nitrile is a nonattendance but it is not a Kabul is not true.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the supernumerary is mealy.; sent2 -> int11: the coelacanth either does sense or is ovine or both.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is a sensing and/or ovine.;
$hypothesis$ = the nitrile is not non-ovine. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a sensing then it is not ovine. sent2: the coelacanth is ovine. sent3: the nitrile is a nonattendance and it is a Kabul. sent4: if the nitrile does sense it is not ovine. sent5: if something is a sensing and/or is a kind of a nonattendance it is not ovine. sent6: the lambskin is a linendraper. sent7: if the coelacanth does not accouter nitrile then the nitrile is a Kabul and it is a sensing. sent8: if something accouters nitrile that it is a nonattendance that is not a Kabul is not right. sent9: everything repots eagerness and accouters nitrile. sent10: the animalization is not ovine. sent11: if the fact that something is a nonattendance but it is not ovine is incorrect then it is ovine. sent12: if something is a linendraper then it repots eagerness and it is not a kind of a mambo. sent13: if the fact that the nitrile is both a nonattendance and not a Kabul is not correct then the supernumerary is mealy. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the nitrile is a nonattendance.; int1 -> int2: either the nitrile does sense or it is a nonattendance or both.; sent5 -> int3: the nitrile is not ovine if it senses and/or it is a nonattendance.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__