there is something such that if it is foliaceous and does not bedew Goddard then it is not herbivorous.
sent1: if something is foliaceous but it does not bedew Goddard it is herbivorous. sent2: the colonoscope is not herbivorous if it is foliaceous thing that bedews Goddard. sent3: if the colonoscope is prenatal and it bedews Goddard then it does not verbify Bren. sent4: there is something such that if it is foliaceous and it bedews Goddard then it is non-herbivorous. sent5: the colonoscope is not reducible if it does verbify pleurothallis and it is not congenial. sent6: there is something such that if it does deglaze high-five and it is not stemmatic it is a kind of a ANOVA. sent7: if the colonoscope is a kind of a Westminster but it is not unfruitful it is herbivorous. sent8: the colonoscope does not bar go if it is viral and does not bar jammed. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it is foliaceous and does not bedew Goddard it is herbivorous is correct. sent10: if something does verbify perceptibility and is not a opsonization it is not unerect. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a littoral and it is an urge it does not garden. sent12: the fact that the colonoscope is herbivorous hold if it is foliaceous and does not bedew Goddard. sent13: something is not herbivorous if it is foliaceous and bedews Goddard. sent14: if something that is reducible is not a Belgrade then it is not herbivorous. sent15: if something is a kind of foliaceous thing that does not bedew Goddard then it is not herbivorous.
sent15 -> int1: if the colonoscope is foliaceous but it does not bedew Goddard then it is not herbivorous.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the Turner is reducible but it is not a Belgrade then it is not herbivorous.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is foliaceous and does not bedew Goddard then it is not herbivorous. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is foliaceous but it does not bedew Goddard it is herbivorous. sent2: the colonoscope is not herbivorous if it is foliaceous thing that bedews Goddard. sent3: if the colonoscope is prenatal and it bedews Goddard then it does not verbify Bren. sent4: there is something such that if it is foliaceous and it bedews Goddard then it is non-herbivorous. sent5: the colonoscope is not reducible if it does verbify pleurothallis and it is not congenial. sent6: there is something such that if it does deglaze high-five and it is not stemmatic it is a kind of a ANOVA. sent7: if the colonoscope is a kind of a Westminster but it is not unfruitful it is herbivorous. sent8: the colonoscope does not bar go if it is viral and does not bar jammed. sent9: the fact that there is something such that if it is foliaceous and does not bedew Goddard it is herbivorous is correct. sent10: if something does verbify perceptibility and is not a opsonization it is not unerect. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a littoral and it is an urge it does not garden. sent12: the fact that the colonoscope is herbivorous hold if it is foliaceous and does not bedew Goddard. sent13: something is not herbivorous if it is foliaceous and bedews Goddard. sent14: if something that is reducible is not a Belgrade then it is not herbivorous. sent15: if something is a kind of foliaceous thing that does not bedew Goddard then it is not herbivorous. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if the colonoscope is foliaceous but it does not bedew Goddard then it is not herbivorous.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__