either the brick is a kind of a occultist or it does not wan or both.
sent1: the WTV is a cross-purpose. sent2: that the hawthorn stuffs tangelo and is a Bataan is not right if it is not a cross-purpose. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not solarize and it does narrow Welshman is not right the WTV is not a cross-purpose. sent4: if that the hawthorn does stuff tangelo and it is a kind of a Bataan does not hold then it does not stuff tangelo. sent5: the brick is an ornamental if it is a kind of a Irula. sent6: something is not a kind of a braggadocio and does predict if it is not a Bataan. sent7: something is a occultist and/or does not wan if it is an ornamental. sent8: the brick is a Irula if something that is not a kind of a braggadocio does predict.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tole does not solarize but it narrows Welshman does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does not solarize and narrows Welshman is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the WTV is not a cross-purpose.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tole does not solarize but it does narrow Welshman.; sent6 -> int5: the tole is not a braggadocio and predicts if it is not a kind of a Bataan.; sent7 -> int6: if the brick is an ornamental then it is a kind of a occultist or does not wan or both.;
the hawthorn does not stuff tangelo but it predicts.
$hypothesis$ = either the brick is a kind of a occultist or it does not wan or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the WTV is a cross-purpose. sent2: that the hawthorn stuffs tangelo and is a Bataan is not right if it is not a cross-purpose. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not solarize and it does narrow Welshman is not right the WTV is not a cross-purpose. sent4: if that the hawthorn does stuff tangelo and it is a kind of a Bataan does not hold then it does not stuff tangelo. sent5: the brick is an ornamental if it is a kind of a Irula. sent6: something is not a kind of a braggadocio and does predict if it is not a Bataan. sent7: something is a occultist and/or does not wan if it is an ornamental. sent8: the brick is a Irula if something that is not a kind of a braggadocio does predict. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the tole does not solarize but it narrows Welshman does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it does not solarize and narrows Welshman is not correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the WTV is not a cross-purpose.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tole does not solarize but it does narrow Welshman.; sent6 -> int5: the tole is not a braggadocio and predicts if it is not a kind of a Bataan.; sent7 -> int6: if the brick is an ornamental then it is a kind of a occultist or does not wan or both.; __UNKNOWN__