the enclave is not athletics but it accumulates.
sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Hollywood then the myofibril does not housekeep Alternanthera. sent2: something does not approach camper if it does not freeze-dry inflection. sent3: if there is something such that it is a randomization and does not invert the enclave is not a Saginaw. sent4: the fact that the umpire freeze-dries inflection and is not a orchotomy is not true. sent5: if the Paranthropus is not a kind of a botanist that it is a Hollywood and it is not credulous is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that it does focus. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a spleen is true then it is a orchotomy and is a kind of a spoiler. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a orchotomy the fact that the purdah freeze-dries inflection hold. sent9: if that the Paranthropus is a kind of a Hollywood but it is not credulous is not true then it is not a Hollywood. sent10: the enclave is not a kind of a Saginaw if a randomization inverts. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Saginaw and it is a focus the umpire approaches camper. sent12: the enclave is not athletics. sent13: that something does not approach camper and does focus is not right if it freeze-dries inflection. sent14: everything is a kind of a randomization that does not invert. sent15: the fact that something does not approach camper is not wrong if that it does freeze-dry inflection and is not a kind of a orchotomy is wrong. sent16: there is something such that it does not invert. sent17: the Paranthropus is not a botanist. sent18: something is a Saginaw and it focuses. sent19: that the gingerbread is a kind of athletics thing that does not freeze-dry baseness does not hold if the enclave is a Saginaw. sent20: if the fact that the stephanion does not approach perceptibility but it is a imperiousness is incorrect then the foreperson is not a spleen. sent21: the umpire is a kind of a Saginaw if the fact that the purdah does not approach camper and does focus does not hold. sent22: the gingerbread does not invert. sent23: there is something such that it is not a Saginaw. sent24: that the stephanion does not approach perceptibility and is a kind of a imperiousness is not correct if that the myofibril does not housekeep Alternanthera is not wrong.
sent14 -> int1: the gingerbread is a randomization but it does not invert.; int1 -> int2: something is a randomization but it does not invert.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the enclave is not a Saginaw.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enclave focuses.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the enclave is not a Saginaw and focuses.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is both not a Saginaw and a focus.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the umpire does approach camper is not wrong.; sent15 -> int7: that the umpire does not approach camper hold if that it does freeze-dry inflection and it is not a orchotomy is not right.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the umpire does not approach camper.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the enclave does not focus.;
that that the enclave is not athletics but it accumulates is correct does not hold.
sent13 -> int11: if the purdah freeze-dries inflection then that it does not approach camper and it is a focus is not correct.; sent7 -> int12: that the foreperson is a kind of a orchotomy that is a kind of the spoiler if that the foreperson is not a spleen is not false is true.; sent5 & sent17 -> int13: the fact that the Paranthropus is not non-Hollywood but incredulous is not true.; sent9 & int13 -> int14: the Paranthropus is not Hollywood.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that it is non-Hollywood.; int15 & sent1 -> int16: the myofibril does not housekeep Alternanthera.; sent24 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the stephanion does not approach perceptibility but it is a kind of a imperiousness is not correct.; sent20 & int17 -> int18: the foreperson is not a spleen.; int12 & int18 -> int19: the foreperson is a orchotomy that is a kind of a spoiler.; int19 -> int20: the foreperson is a kind of a orchotomy.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that the fact that it is a orchotomy is not wrong.; int21 & sent8 -> int22: the purdah does freeze-dry inflection.; int11 & int22 -> int23: the fact that the purdah does not approach camper but it is a focus is not right.; sent21 & int23 -> int24: the umpire is a Saginaw.; int24 -> int25: something is a kind of a Saginaw.;
$hypothesis$ = the enclave is not athletics but it accumulates. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Hollywood then the myofibril does not housekeep Alternanthera. sent2: something does not approach camper if it does not freeze-dry inflection. sent3: if there is something such that it is a randomization and does not invert the enclave is not a Saginaw. sent4: the fact that the umpire freeze-dries inflection and is not a orchotomy is not true. sent5: if the Paranthropus is not a kind of a botanist that it is a Hollywood and it is not credulous is not correct. sent6: there exists something such that it does focus. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a spleen is true then it is a orchotomy and is a kind of a spoiler. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a orchotomy the fact that the purdah freeze-dries inflection hold. sent9: if that the Paranthropus is a kind of a Hollywood but it is not credulous is not true then it is not a Hollywood. sent10: the enclave is not a kind of a Saginaw if a randomization inverts. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Saginaw and it is a focus the umpire approaches camper. sent12: the enclave is not athletics. sent13: that something does not approach camper and does focus is not right if it freeze-dries inflection. sent14: everything is a kind of a randomization that does not invert. sent15: the fact that something does not approach camper is not wrong if that it does freeze-dry inflection and is not a kind of a orchotomy is wrong. sent16: there is something such that it does not invert. sent17: the Paranthropus is not a botanist. sent18: something is a Saginaw and it focuses. sent19: that the gingerbread is a kind of athletics thing that does not freeze-dry baseness does not hold if the enclave is a Saginaw. sent20: if the fact that the stephanion does not approach perceptibility but it is a imperiousness is incorrect then the foreperson is not a spleen. sent21: the umpire is a kind of a Saginaw if the fact that the purdah does not approach camper and does focus does not hold. sent22: the gingerbread does not invert. sent23: there is something such that it is not a Saginaw. sent24: that the stephanion does not approach perceptibility and is a kind of a imperiousness is not correct if that the myofibril does not housekeep Alternanthera is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the gingerbread is a randomization but it does not invert.; int1 -> int2: something is a randomization but it does not invert.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the enclave is not a Saginaw.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the enclave focuses.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the enclave is not a Saginaw and focuses.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is both not a Saginaw and a focus.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the umpire does approach camper is not wrong.; sent15 -> int7: that the umpire does not approach camper hold if that it does freeze-dry inflection and it is not a orchotomy is not right.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the umpire does not approach camper.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the enclave does not focus.; __UNKNOWN__