that there is something such that if it does avail then it does not queue stew or it knots berkelium or both is not right.
sent1: the megaloblast is a kind of an avail that queues pocketcomb if there are non-centripetal things. sent2: there is nothing such that it is pyrotechnic thing that is a kind of a Eriocaulon. sent3: if the fact that the megaloblast does not queue stew and/or it does knot berkelium is wrong that it is not an avail is not false. sent4: if there are nonreturnable things then the stew is not centripetal. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is pyrotechnic and it is a kind of a Eriocaulon is not true then the fishmonger is not a minuscule. sent6: the Nesselrode is not returnable if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a tael but bicentennial is wrong. sent7: if an avail queues pocketcomb the lifeblood is not a kind of a Buck. sent8: the paraldehyde does cachinnate and/or is a kind of a garlic if the fishmonger is not a minuscule. sent9: if that the megaloblast is a guarantee and/or it is a salutation is not correct the fact that it does not knot angelus hold. sent10: the megaloblast does queue stew. sent11: if the outpost is a garlic then the cymbid does queue Beecher. sent12: the outpost is a garlic if the paraldehyde cachinnates. sent13: the fact that something is not a tael but it is a kind of a bicentennial is not right if it does queue Beecher. sent14: that something is not a kind of an empiricist and/or is a kind of an unpredictability does not hold if it is not a Buck. sent15: the outpost is a garlic if the paraldehyde is a kind of a garlic. sent16: if the fact that the consumer does not queue Bubulcus or avails or both does not hold that it blinkers bus is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the megaloblast does not queue stew and/or it does knot berkelium is not right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the megaloblast is not an avail.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the megaloblast does avail.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the megaloblast does not queue stew and/or knots berkelium.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: if the megaloblast does avail it does not queue stew and/or it does knot berkelium.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the lifeblood is not an empiricist and/or it is a kind of an unpredictability is not true.
sent14 -> int5: if the lifeblood is not a Buck then the fact that it is not an empiricist and/or it is a kind of an unpredictability is not right.; sent13 -> int6: the fact that the cymbid is both not a tael and a bicentennial is false if it queues Beecher.; sent2 -> int7: the fact that the mesomorph is pyrotechnic a Eriocaulon is not correct.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is pyrotechnic and it is a Eriocaulon is correct is wrong.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fishmonger is not a minuscule.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: the paraldehyde cachinnates and/or it is a garlic.; int10 & sent12 & sent15 -> int11: the outpost is a garlic.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: the cymbid queues Beecher.; int6 & int12 -> int13: that the cymbid is not a tael but it is a bicentennial is wrong.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that that it is not a tael but bicentennial is not right.; int14 & sent6 -> int15: the Nesselrode is not returnable.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is not returnable.; int16 & sent4 -> int17: the stew is not centripetal.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that the fact that it is centripetal is incorrect.; int18 & sent1 -> int19: the megaloblast avails and it does queue pocketcomb.; int19 -> int20: something is a kind of an avail and it queues pocketcomb.; int20 & sent7 -> int21: the lifeblood is not a Buck.; int5 & int21 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does avail then it does not queue stew or it knots berkelium or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the megaloblast is a kind of an avail that queues pocketcomb if there are non-centripetal things. sent2: there is nothing such that it is pyrotechnic thing that is a kind of a Eriocaulon. sent3: if the fact that the megaloblast does not queue stew and/or it does knot berkelium is wrong that it is not an avail is not false. sent4: if there are nonreturnable things then the stew is not centripetal. sent5: if there exists something such that that it is pyrotechnic and it is a kind of a Eriocaulon is not true then the fishmonger is not a minuscule. sent6: the Nesselrode is not returnable if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a tael but bicentennial is wrong. sent7: if an avail queues pocketcomb the lifeblood is not a kind of a Buck. sent8: the paraldehyde does cachinnate and/or is a kind of a garlic if the fishmonger is not a minuscule. sent9: if that the megaloblast is a guarantee and/or it is a salutation is not correct the fact that it does not knot angelus hold. sent10: the megaloblast does queue stew. sent11: if the outpost is a garlic then the cymbid does queue Beecher. sent12: the outpost is a garlic if the paraldehyde cachinnates. sent13: the fact that something is not a tael but it is a kind of a bicentennial is not right if it does queue Beecher. sent14: that something is not a kind of an empiricist and/or is a kind of an unpredictability does not hold if it is not a Buck. sent15: the outpost is a garlic if the paraldehyde is a kind of a garlic. sent16: if the fact that the consumer does not queue Bubulcus or avails or both does not hold that it blinkers bus is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the megaloblast does not queue stew and/or it does knot berkelium is not right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the megaloblast is not an avail.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the megaloblast does avail.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the megaloblast does not queue stew and/or knots berkelium.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: if the megaloblast does avail it does not queue stew and/or it does knot berkelium.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__