the Marrano is not a oneiromancy.
sent1: if something is a pudge it does not aggregate Honshu and/or is a Onychophora. sent2: the croupier is Christological. sent3: if something either does not aggregate Honshu or is a Onychophora or both the fact that it does not aggregate Honshu is right. sent4: there is something such that it is an aerial. sent5: the voucher is androgynous. sent6: the voucher does not aggregate Honshu. sent7: the fact that the fact that the Marrano is not zonal but it is a Onychophora hold is not correct if it is not a pudge. sent8: the voucher aggregates Honshu if the fact that the croupier is a polyanthus but it is not androgynous is not correct. sent9: the Marrano is not a pudge if something that is a polyanthus is not androgynous. sent10: the croupier is zonal if it is a polyanthus. sent11: The Honshu does not aggregate voucher. sent12: something is a oneiromancy if it is Christological. sent13: if that the Marrano is not zonal but a Onychophora is not correct then it is Christological. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a pudge. sent15: if that the croupier is a kind of a pudge is true the Marrano is androgynous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the croupier is a polyanthus but it is not androgynous does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the voucher aggregates Honshu.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the croupier is a kind of a polyanthus but it is not androgynous.; int3 -> int4: something is a polyanthus and is not androgynous.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the Marrano is not a pudge.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the Marrano is a kind of non-zonal thing that is a Onychophora is incorrect.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the Marrano is Christological.; sent12 -> int8: the Marrano is a oneiromancy if it is Christological.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the Marrano is not a kind of a oneiromancy.
sent3 -> int9: that the croupier does not aggregate Honshu hold if it does not aggregate Honshu and/or is a Onychophora.; sent1 -> int10: if the croupier is a kind of a pudge it either does not aggregate Honshu or is a Onychophora or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the Marrano is not a oneiromancy. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a pudge it does not aggregate Honshu and/or is a Onychophora. sent2: the croupier is Christological. sent3: if something either does not aggregate Honshu or is a Onychophora or both the fact that it does not aggregate Honshu is right. sent4: there is something such that it is an aerial. sent5: the voucher is androgynous. sent6: the voucher does not aggregate Honshu. sent7: the fact that the fact that the Marrano is not zonal but it is a Onychophora hold is not correct if it is not a pudge. sent8: the voucher aggregates Honshu if the fact that the croupier is a polyanthus but it is not androgynous is not correct. sent9: the Marrano is not a pudge if something that is a polyanthus is not androgynous. sent10: the croupier is zonal if it is a polyanthus. sent11: The Honshu does not aggregate voucher. sent12: something is a oneiromancy if it is Christological. sent13: if that the Marrano is not zonal but a Onychophora is not correct then it is Christological. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a pudge. sent15: if that the croupier is a kind of a pudge is true the Marrano is androgynous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the croupier is a polyanthus but it is not androgynous does not hold.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the voucher aggregates Honshu.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the croupier is a kind of a polyanthus but it is not androgynous.; int3 -> int4: something is a polyanthus and is not androgynous.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the Marrano is not a pudge.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the fact that the Marrano is a kind of non-zonal thing that is a Onychophora is incorrect.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the Marrano is Christological.; sent12 -> int8: the Marrano is a oneiromancy if it is Christological.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__