the refrigerator is not a subjunctive but it is carbonaceous.
sent1: the colugo does mince if that it is a kind of a boorishness hold. sent2: that the kaolin does bow amine is right if it overhangs. sent3: that the kaolin is not a Paleolithic and it is not a praline is not correct if it does bow amine. sent4: if the strawberry does bow racking the kaolin overhangs. sent5: the strawberry does advertise and does bow racking. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a subjunctive but it is carbonaceous is not true if it does advertise. sent7: if the colugo does mince the refrigerator is not subjunctive and is carbonaceous. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a Paleolithic and not a praline is not true the colugo is a boorishness. sent9: something does advertise and it does bow racking if it is not a kind of an overhang. sent10: the refrigerator does not overhang if the fact that that the strawberry is not a praline but it bows amine is right is not true.
sent5 -> int1: the strawberry does bow racking.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the kaolin overhangs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the kaolin bows amine.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the kaolin is both not a Paleolithic and not a praline is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Paleolithic and is not a kind of a praline is wrong.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the colugo is a boorishness.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the colugo is a mince.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the refrigerator is not a subjunctive but it is carbonaceous does not hold.
sent6 -> int8: that the refrigerator is non-subjunctive but it is carbonaceous is not correct if it does advertise.; sent9 -> int9: if the refrigerator does not overhang then it advertises and it bows racking.;
$hypothesis$ = the refrigerator is not a subjunctive but it is carbonaceous. ; $context$ = sent1: the colugo does mince if that it is a kind of a boorishness hold. sent2: that the kaolin does bow amine is right if it overhangs. sent3: that the kaolin is not a Paleolithic and it is not a praline is not correct if it does bow amine. sent4: if the strawberry does bow racking the kaolin overhangs. sent5: the strawberry does advertise and does bow racking. sent6: the fact that something is not a kind of a subjunctive but it is carbonaceous is not true if it does advertise. sent7: if the colugo does mince the refrigerator is not subjunctive and is carbonaceous. sent8: if there is something such that that it is not a Paleolithic and not a praline is not true the colugo is a boorishness. sent9: something does advertise and it does bow racking if it is not a kind of an overhang. sent10: the refrigerator does not overhang if the fact that that the strawberry is not a praline but it bows amine is right is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the strawberry does bow racking.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the kaolin overhangs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the kaolin bows amine.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the kaolin is both not a Paleolithic and not a praline is wrong.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a Paleolithic and is not a kind of a praline is wrong.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the colugo is a boorishness.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the colugo is a mince.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__