the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Barbadian then the fact that it does not approach dieter and is not pediatric is not correct is false.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a niece then that it is not congregational and it is not a kind of a shire is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it is priestly then the fact that it does not glaze and it does not administer is not correct. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it does freeze-dry pedometer then that it is not a kind of a niece and it is not a kind of a caroler is incorrect is correct. sent4: if the Capricorn is congregational the fact that it does not approach mastoid and is not a kind of a Barbadian is not true. sent5: the Capricorn does not approach dieter and is not pediatric if it is a Barbadian. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Barbadian then it does not approach dieter and is not pediatric. sent7: if that the Capricorn is a Barbadian is not wrong then the fact that it does not approach dieter and it is not pediatric does not hold. sent8: if something obliterates then that it is not a inula and does not approach dieter is not right. sent9: the fact that the Capricorn does not approach dieter but it is pediatric does not hold if it is Barbadian. sent10: there is something such that if it is a Barbadian then the fact that it does approach dieter and is not pediatric is false. sent11: the fact that the evolutionist is not a squall and does not approach dieter is not right if it does approach balderdash. sent12: that something is not a doubles and it does not underquote does not hold if it does housekeep jawed. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not non-Barbadian that it does not approach dieter and is pediatric is not true. sent14: that the Capricorn does approach dieter but it is not pediatric does not hold if it is a kind of a Barbadian. sent15: if the Capricorn is typographic that it does not underquote and it is not opposite is not correct.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
if the calabash obliterates then that it is not a inula and it does not approach dieter does not hold.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Barbadian then the fact that it does not approach dieter and is not pediatric is not correct is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a niece then that it is not congregational and it is not a kind of a shire is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it is priestly then the fact that it does not glaze and it does not administer is not correct. sent3: the fact that there exists something such that if it does freeze-dry pedometer then that it is not a kind of a niece and it is not a kind of a caroler is incorrect is correct. sent4: if the Capricorn is congregational the fact that it does not approach mastoid and is not a kind of a Barbadian is not true. sent5: the Capricorn does not approach dieter and is not pediatric if it is a Barbadian. sent6: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Barbadian then it does not approach dieter and is not pediatric. sent7: if that the Capricorn is a Barbadian is not wrong then the fact that it does not approach dieter and it is not pediatric does not hold. sent8: if something obliterates then that it is not a inula and does not approach dieter is not right. sent9: the fact that the Capricorn does not approach dieter but it is pediatric does not hold if it is Barbadian. sent10: there is something such that if it is a Barbadian then the fact that it does approach dieter and is not pediatric is false. sent11: the fact that the evolutionist is not a squall and does not approach dieter is not right if it does approach balderdash. sent12: that something is not a doubles and it does not underquote does not hold if it does housekeep jawed. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not non-Barbadian that it does not approach dieter and is pediatric is not true. sent14: that the Capricorn does approach dieter but it is not pediatric does not hold if it is a kind of a Barbadian. sent15: if the Capricorn is typographic that it does not underquote and it is not opposite is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__