the target does nag Ecballium.
sent1: the case is a hypodermic. sent2: the imprint is a kind of a Sherman that is not an embolism. sent3: the imprint is a clamor if there exists something such that that it does not repent photographer is not true. sent4: if the trombiculid tarnishes Seljuk then it repents photographer. sent5: the fact that the prickleback is not a Union and is econometric is not right if the target is not a hernia. sent6: if the fact that the target is a MPEG that does not nag Ecballium is false the choirboy is not a ballgame. sent7: the fact that the imprint is a ballgame and it is a kind of a hernia is wrong. sent8: if the case is not non-hypodermic then the chopine nags pickled but it is not a Dimocarpus. sent9: something is a ballgame that is not a hernia if it is an embolism. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bushwhacker and tarnishes pogge is false the choirboy is not oleaceous. sent11: the imprint is not Union if it is a Sherman and not an embolism. sent12: that the chorion does not tarnish Seljuk and is non-aeronautical is not right if the Nobelist does chomp onyxis. sent13: something is a ballgame if the fact that it either is not an embolism or is a kind of a Union or both does not hold. sent14: that the choirboy is a ballgame is not false if it is a hernia. sent15: if there is something such that it does nag pickled and it is not a Dimocarpus then the Nobelist does chomp onyxis. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it does not tarnish Seljuk and is not aeronautical does not hold then the trombiculid tarnish Seljuk. sent17: everything is not a kind of a Sherman or it does not tarnish pogge or both. sent18: if the fact that the choirboy is not a kind of a Sherman is right that either it is not an embolism or it is a Union or both is not right. sent19: if the choirboy is a kind of an embolism the target is an embolism. sent20: if that something is not oleaceous is true it is a Sherman or an embolism or both. sent21: something is a kind of a Union if the fact that it is both not a ballgame and a hernia is not correct. sent22: the target is a kind of an embolism if the choirboy is a Sherman. sent23: if something is a kind of a clamor that it is not a kind of a bushwhacker and it tarnishes pogge is not true. sent24: that the imprint is not a ballgame but a hernia is not correct if the choirboy is not a ballgame. sent25: if the target is not a MPEG then the choirboy is not a ballgame.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the target is a MPEG but it does not nag Ecballium is not true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the choirboy is not a kind of a ballgame.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: that the imprint is not a ballgame but a hernia does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: the imprint is a Union if the fact that it is both not a ballgame and a hernia is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the imprint is a Union.; sent11 & sent2 -> int5: the imprint is not a Union.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the target is a MPEG but it does not nag Ecballium.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the prickleback is not a Union but it is econometric is not true.
sent9 -> int8: if the target is a kind of an embolism then it is a ballgame but not a hernia.; sent20 -> int9: the choirboy is a kind of a Sherman and/or it is an embolism if the fact that it is non-oleaceous is correct.; sent23 -> int10: the fact that the imprint is not a bushwhacker and tarnishes pogge is not correct if it clamors.; sent8 & sent1 -> int11: the chopine does nag pickled and is not a kind of a Dimocarpus.; int11 -> int12: something nags pickled but it is not a Dimocarpus.; int12 & sent15 -> int13: the Nobelist chomps onyxis.; sent12 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the chorion does not tarnish Seljuk and it is not aeronautical is incorrect.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it does not tarnish Seljuk and it is not aeronautical is wrong.; int15 & sent16 -> int16: the trombiculid does tarnish Seljuk.; sent4 & int16 -> int17: the trombiculid repents photographer.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it does repent photographer.; int18 & sent3 -> int19: the imprint is a clamor.; int10 & int19 -> int20: that the imprint is not a bushwhacker but it does tarnish pogge is not true.; int20 -> int21: there is something such that the fact that it is not a bushwhacker and does tarnish pogge is incorrect.; int21 & sent10 -> int22: the choirboy is not oleaceous.; int9 & int22 -> int23: the choirboy is a kind of a Sherman or it is an embolism or both.; int23 & sent22 & sent19 -> int24: the target is an embolism.; int8 & int24 -> int25: the target is a ballgame but it is not a hernia.; int25 -> int26: the target is not a hernia.; sent5 & int26 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the target does nag Ecballium. ; $context$ = sent1: the case is a hypodermic. sent2: the imprint is a kind of a Sherman that is not an embolism. sent3: the imprint is a clamor if there exists something such that that it does not repent photographer is not true. sent4: if the trombiculid tarnishes Seljuk then it repents photographer. sent5: the fact that the prickleback is not a Union and is econometric is not right if the target is not a hernia. sent6: if the fact that the target is a MPEG that does not nag Ecballium is false the choirboy is not a ballgame. sent7: the fact that the imprint is a ballgame and it is a kind of a hernia is wrong. sent8: if the case is not non-hypodermic then the chopine nags pickled but it is not a Dimocarpus. sent9: something is a ballgame that is not a hernia if it is an embolism. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bushwhacker and tarnishes pogge is false the choirboy is not oleaceous. sent11: the imprint is not Union if it is a Sherman and not an embolism. sent12: that the chorion does not tarnish Seljuk and is non-aeronautical is not right if the Nobelist does chomp onyxis. sent13: something is a ballgame if the fact that it either is not an embolism or is a kind of a Union or both does not hold. sent14: that the choirboy is a ballgame is not false if it is a hernia. sent15: if there is something such that it does nag pickled and it is not a Dimocarpus then the Nobelist does chomp onyxis. sent16: if there is something such that the fact that it does not tarnish Seljuk and is not aeronautical does not hold then the trombiculid tarnish Seljuk. sent17: everything is not a kind of a Sherman or it does not tarnish pogge or both. sent18: if the fact that the choirboy is not a kind of a Sherman is right that either it is not an embolism or it is a Union or both is not right. sent19: if the choirboy is a kind of an embolism the target is an embolism. sent20: if that something is not oleaceous is true it is a Sherman or an embolism or both. sent21: something is a kind of a Union if the fact that it is both not a ballgame and a hernia is not correct. sent22: the target is a kind of an embolism if the choirboy is a Sherman. sent23: if something is a kind of a clamor that it is not a kind of a bushwhacker and it tarnishes pogge is not true. sent24: that the imprint is not a ballgame but a hernia is not correct if the choirboy is not a ballgame. sent25: if the target is not a MPEG then the choirboy is not a ballgame. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the target is a MPEG but it does not nag Ecballium is not true.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the choirboy is not a kind of a ballgame.; int1 & sent24 -> int2: that the imprint is not a ballgame but a hernia does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: the imprint is a Union if the fact that it is both not a ballgame and a hernia is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the imprint is a Union.; sent11 & sent2 -> int5: the imprint is not a Union.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the target is a MPEG but it does not nag Ecballium.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__