the scapular does not reciprocate transplant.
sent1: the voice reciprocates transplant. sent2: if the olivenite is categorial then the fact that it drowses Septobasidiaceae is not incorrect. sent3: the jerky does concrete but it is not a duality if the vagus is a pill. sent4: the ankylosaur is unseductive. sent5: if something is not immunodeficient then it is not unseductive and it is calyceal. sent6: the fact that the cue is not immunodeficient is right if that the fact that the wrench is a kind of immunodeficient thing that is not a kind of a burn does not hold hold. sent7: the scapular does reciprocate transplant if it is unseductive. sent8: the scapular is unseductive. sent9: the scapular does not reciprocate transplant if the cue is not unseductive but it is calyceal. sent10: the voice does burn and it is concrete if it is not a kind of a duality. sent11: something is both not seductive and non-calyceal if it is immunodeficient. sent12: the voice is immunodeficient if it is a burn. sent13: the vagus is a pill if it is a bloodstained.
sent7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the voice does reciprocate transplant.
sent11 -> int1: that the voice is both unseductive and not calyceal if the voice is immunodeficient is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the scapular does not reciprocate transplant. ; $context$ = sent1: the voice reciprocates transplant. sent2: if the olivenite is categorial then the fact that it drowses Septobasidiaceae is not incorrect. sent3: the jerky does concrete but it is not a duality if the vagus is a pill. sent4: the ankylosaur is unseductive. sent5: if something is not immunodeficient then it is not unseductive and it is calyceal. sent6: the fact that the cue is not immunodeficient is right if that the fact that the wrench is a kind of immunodeficient thing that is not a kind of a burn does not hold hold. sent7: the scapular does reciprocate transplant if it is unseductive. sent8: the scapular is unseductive. sent9: the scapular does not reciprocate transplant if the cue is not unseductive but it is calyceal. sent10: the voice does burn and it is concrete if it is not a kind of a duality. sent11: something is both not seductive and non-calyceal if it is immunodeficient. sent12: the voice is immunodeficient if it is a burn. sent13: the vagus is a pill if it is a bloodstained. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__