that the nurse-midwife is afloat is true.
sent1: the antiaircraft is not non-catechetical but afloat if there is something such that it does not sensualize derivation. sent2: if the antiaircraft is catechetical and afloat the nurse-midwife is not afloat. sent3: the antiaircraft is milch. sent4: the antiaircraft bawls antiaircraft. sent5: the nurse-midwife is catechetical. sent6: the fact that the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction but it bawls antiaircraft is wrong if it is not non-catechetical. sent7: the nurse-midwife is afloat and is catechetical if the antiaircraft is not catechetical. sent8: if the fact that the fact that something does sensualize derivation and is not a piece hold does not hold it does not sensualize derivation. sent9: The antiaircraft bawls antiaircraft. sent10: that the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antiaircraft is not non-catechetical.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the fact that the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction and bawls antiaircraft hold does not hold hold.; sent10 & sent4 -> int2: the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction and bawls antiaircraft.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the antiaircraft is not catechetical hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the nurse-midwife is afloat and catechetical.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the nurse-midwife is not afloat.
sent8 -> int6: the works does not sensualize derivation if the fact that it does sensualize derivation and it is not a piece is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the nurse-midwife is afloat is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the antiaircraft is not non-catechetical but afloat if there is something such that it does not sensualize derivation. sent2: if the antiaircraft is catechetical and afloat the nurse-midwife is not afloat. sent3: the antiaircraft is milch. sent4: the antiaircraft bawls antiaircraft. sent5: the nurse-midwife is catechetical. sent6: the fact that the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction but it bawls antiaircraft is wrong if it is not non-catechetical. sent7: the nurse-midwife is afloat and is catechetical if the antiaircraft is not catechetical. sent8: if the fact that the fact that something does sensualize derivation and is not a piece hold does not hold it does not sensualize derivation. sent9: The antiaircraft bawls antiaircraft. sent10: that the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antiaircraft is not non-catechetical.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the fact that the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction and bawls antiaircraft hold does not hold hold.; sent10 & sent4 -> int2: the antiaircraft is not a dysfunction and bawls antiaircraft.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the antiaircraft is not catechetical hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the nurse-midwife is afloat and catechetical.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__