the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur.
sent1: the antennalness does not occur and the lumbosacralness does not occur. sent2: the arbitraging happens and the demising eelgrass occurs. sent3: that both the demising Qin and the entry occurs is right. sent4: that the non-boldness and the non-succinicness occurs is false. sent5: that the fact that the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment occurs is not wrong is wrong. sent6: if the arbitraging does not occur then the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur. sent7: the stampeding cyclooxygenase-2 happens. sent8: if that the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur is true the demising eelgrass does not occur. sent9: the demising paradigm happens. sent10: that the demising eelgrass does not occur is brought about by that the collusion but not the quenching resentment occurs. sent11: the enacting Canaanitic happens. sent12: that the collusion does not occur but the quenching resentment happens prevents the demising eelgrass. sent13: the fact that the collusion happens but the quenching resentment does not occur is not correct. sent14: that the participation does not occur and the quenching beggar-my-neighbor does not occur is right. sent15: that the demising bluffness but not the upturn occurs is not true. sent16: the repair happens. sent17: the fact that the macroeconomicsness does not occur hold. sent18: the dumps does not occur and the worsting does not occur. sent19: the fact that the fact that the psychomotorness and the non-rawness occurs is true is wrong. sent20: the gritting occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the demising eelgrass does not occur.; sent2 -> int2: the demising eelgrass happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the antennalness does not occur and the lumbosacralness does not occur. sent2: the arbitraging happens and the demising eelgrass occurs. sent3: that both the demising Qin and the entry occurs is right. sent4: that the non-boldness and the non-succinicness occurs is false. sent5: that the fact that the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment occurs is not wrong is wrong. sent6: if the arbitraging does not occur then the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur. sent7: the stampeding cyclooxygenase-2 happens. sent8: if that the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur is true the demising eelgrass does not occur. sent9: the demising paradigm happens. sent10: that the demising eelgrass does not occur is brought about by that the collusion but not the quenching resentment occurs. sent11: the enacting Canaanitic happens. sent12: that the collusion does not occur but the quenching resentment happens prevents the demising eelgrass. sent13: the fact that the collusion happens but the quenching resentment does not occur is not correct. sent14: that the participation does not occur and the quenching beggar-my-neighbor does not occur is right. sent15: that the demising bluffness but not the upturn occurs is not true. sent16: the repair happens. sent17: the fact that the macroeconomicsness does not occur hold. sent18: the dumps does not occur and the worsting does not occur. sent19: the fact that the fact that the psychomotorness and the non-rawness occurs is true is wrong. sent20: the gritting occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the collusion does not occur and the quenching resentment does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the demising eelgrass does not occur.; sent2 -> int2: the demising eelgrass happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__