the appendicle is not autoradiographic.
sent1: the truant is autoradiographic. sent2: that that the taxman does remove valgus and is not drupaceous does not hold if the taxman is bregmatic hold. sent3: if the appendicle does toughen then it is fashionable. sent4: that the appendicle tames and is not non-bregmatic is not right if it is an emblem. sent5: if the acetylene is not an ideal it is an emblem. sent6: if the fact that the appendicle does spring-clean Harvey and is not an emblem is not right then it is a frontbencher. sent7: the fact that something is an emblem that does not toughen is not correct if it is bregmatic. sent8: the fact that the appendicle is autoradiographic but it is not a devaluation is false. sent9: if something is a kind of an emblem the fact that it tames and it is bregmatic does not hold. sent10: if the appendicle is Seljuk the fact that it is bregmatic and non-evidentiary is wrong. sent11: the appendicle is autoradiographic if it does toughen. sent12: if the fact that something is an emblem is true then that it toughens and it is bregmatic does not hold. sent13: the sealer is autoradiographic if it grins. sent14: the appendicle is an emblem. sent15: the fact that the appendicle does spring-clean intercept is true. sent16: that the bomber is a kind of a Seljuk and it is seasonable is false if it is autoradiographic. sent17: if the appendicle is a Bradypodidae then it is a grub. sent18: if that the acetylene is a kind of a purge and it is a kind of an ideal is wrong then it is not an ideal. sent19: if something is a kind of an emblem then the fact that it tames and it is not bregmatic is not true. sent20: the appendicle does toughen if that it tames and it is not bregmatic does not hold. sent21: that the acetylene does purge and it is ideal does not hold.
sent19 -> int1: that the appendicle is tamed thing that is not bregmatic does not hold if it is an emblem.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the appendicle does tame but it is not bregmatic is not correct.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the appendicle toughens.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the appendicle is not autoradiographic hold.
sent18 & sent21 -> int4: the acetylene is not ideal.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the acetylene is an emblem.;
$hypothesis$ = the appendicle is not autoradiographic. ; $context$ = sent1: the truant is autoradiographic. sent2: that that the taxman does remove valgus and is not drupaceous does not hold if the taxman is bregmatic hold. sent3: if the appendicle does toughen then it is fashionable. sent4: that the appendicle tames and is not non-bregmatic is not right if it is an emblem. sent5: if the acetylene is not an ideal it is an emblem. sent6: if the fact that the appendicle does spring-clean Harvey and is not an emblem is not right then it is a frontbencher. sent7: the fact that something is an emblem that does not toughen is not correct if it is bregmatic. sent8: the fact that the appendicle is autoradiographic but it is not a devaluation is false. sent9: if something is a kind of an emblem the fact that it tames and it is bregmatic does not hold. sent10: if the appendicle is Seljuk the fact that it is bregmatic and non-evidentiary is wrong. sent11: the appendicle is autoradiographic if it does toughen. sent12: if the fact that something is an emblem is true then that it toughens and it is bregmatic does not hold. sent13: the sealer is autoradiographic if it grins. sent14: the appendicle is an emblem. sent15: the fact that the appendicle does spring-clean intercept is true. sent16: that the bomber is a kind of a Seljuk and it is seasonable is false if it is autoradiographic. sent17: if the appendicle is a Bradypodidae then it is a grub. sent18: if that the acetylene is a kind of a purge and it is a kind of an ideal is wrong then it is not an ideal. sent19: if something is a kind of an emblem then the fact that it tames and it is not bregmatic is not true. sent20: the appendicle does toughen if that it tames and it is not bregmatic does not hold. sent21: that the acetylene does purge and it is ideal does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: that the appendicle is tamed thing that is not bregmatic does not hold if it is an emblem.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: that the appendicle does tame but it is not bregmatic is not correct.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the appendicle toughens.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__