there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Epona that it is not a kind of a muller and it is a jingle is not correct.
sent1: something does not protest but it sags racketeer if it is a kind of an oxbow. sent2: if something brisks the fact that it is a kind of unsuccessful thing that ejaculates whey does not hold. sent3: if the electrode is a muller it does not ejaculate iodine and is Triassic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a nogging then it is not a lymphocyte and descends. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a divot that it is amethystine and it is a bohemia is not right. sent6: if the electrode is a kind of a constitutional the fact that it is not obligated but a cruller is not correct. sent7: that something is not a satinet but it is a Karpov is incorrect if it is operable. sent8: the fact that the electrode is a kind of a thermocouple that is opportune is incorrect if it is a jingle. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a Epona it is not a muller and it is a jingle. sent10: there is something such that if it seeps fluorescein it is non-hadal and premenopausal. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a Epona then that it is a muller and it is a kind of a jingle is incorrect. sent12: if something is a tetracycline then the fact that it is not a kind of a bohemia and it is a profiterole does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it sags leadwort it is not a tetracycline and it is a Chlorophoneus. sent14: the fact that the electrode is a kind of armillary a sweet does not hold if it ejaculates Buccinidae. sent15: that something does seep flatbread and sags exteroceptor does not hold if it is endothelial. sent16: that that the electrode is a kind of a muller and it is a jingle is correct is not correct if it is a Epona. sent17: that the vellum nominates and it is a Oujda is wrong if it is a jingle.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Epona that it is not a kind of a muller and it is a jingle is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not protest but it sags racketeer if it is a kind of an oxbow. sent2: if something brisks the fact that it is a kind of unsuccessful thing that ejaculates whey does not hold. sent3: if the electrode is a muller it does not ejaculate iodine and is Triassic. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a nogging then it is not a lymphocyte and descends. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a divot that it is amethystine and it is a bohemia is not right. sent6: if the electrode is a kind of a constitutional the fact that it is not obligated but a cruller is not correct. sent7: that something is not a satinet but it is a Karpov is incorrect if it is operable. sent8: the fact that the electrode is a kind of a thermocouple that is opportune is incorrect if it is a jingle. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a Epona it is not a muller and it is a jingle. sent10: there is something such that if it seeps fluorescein it is non-hadal and premenopausal. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a Epona then that it is a muller and it is a kind of a jingle is incorrect. sent12: if something is a tetracycline then the fact that it is not a kind of a bohemia and it is a profiterole does not hold. sent13: there is something such that if it sags leadwort it is not a tetracycline and it is a Chlorophoneus. sent14: the fact that the electrode is a kind of armillary a sweet does not hold if it ejaculates Buccinidae. sent15: that something does seep flatbread and sags exteroceptor does not hold if it is endothelial. sent16: that that the electrode is a kind of a muller and it is a jingle is correct is not correct if it is a Epona. sent17: that the vellum nominates and it is a Oujda is wrong if it is a jingle. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__