the hisser does not approbate guarantee.
sent1: if something is a eaglet and/or does underquote zarf then it does not approbate guarantee. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a Flemish and it is not a headship then the declinometer is wearable. sent3: the fact that the president does not cloy bloodlust and is not non-Olympic is not right if it is a kind of a nasality. sent4: if the declinometer is wearable then the carriage is wearable. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not cloy bloodlust and it is Olympic is not right the godparent does not underquote zarf. sent6: the godparent does not underquote zarf and is not a eaglet. sent7: the fact that something is a survivalist and it is a kind of a eaglet is not right if it does not underquote zarf. sent8: if something is a kind of a Flemish that does not cloy bloodlust then that the trey does approbate guarantee is not false. sent9: the fact that the president is a headship but it is not Olympic does not hold if the trey is not a headship. sent10: that the president is not a kind of a eaglet and does not cloy bloodlust does not hold if the fact that the godparent is not a eaglet is right. sent11: the fact that the godparent is integrative hold if something that does not underquote zarf is not a kind of a nasality. sent12: if the carriage is not integrative or it does underquote Booth or both the hisser does approbate guarantee. sent13: if that something is not a eaglet and does not cloy bloodlust is incorrect it is not Olympic. sent14: if that the president is not Olympic is not false then that the carriage is a nasality hold. sent15: if that the president is wearable is not incorrect then it is a nasality. sent16: the hisser is wearable. sent17: if the hisser is both wearable and a nasality then it is not Olympic. sent18: the trey is not a kind of a Flemish and is not a headship. sent19: the hisser cloys bloodlust and it does underquote zarf if it is not Olympic. sent20: if a nasality is wearable then it is disintegrative.
sent6 -> int1: the godparent is not a eaglet.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the president is not a eaglet and it does not cloy bloodlust is not correct.; sent13 -> int3: the president is not Olympic if that it is not a eaglet and it does not cloy bloodlust is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the president is not Olympic.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the carriage is a nasality.; sent18 -> int6: something is not a Flemish and it is not a headship.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the declinometer is wearable.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the carriage is wearable.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the carriage is a nasality and it is wearable.; sent20 -> int10: the carriage is disintegrative if it is a nasality and is wearable.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the carriage is not integrative.; int11 -> int12: the carriage either is disintegrative or underquotes Booth or both.; int12 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the killifish is not a kind of a survivalist or underquotes pilaster or both.
sent7 -> int13: the fact that the godparent is a kind of a survivalist and is a eaglet is not true if the fact that it does not underquote zarf is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the hisser does not approbate guarantee. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a eaglet and/or does underquote zarf then it does not approbate guarantee. sent2: if there is something such that it is not a Flemish and it is not a headship then the declinometer is wearable. sent3: the fact that the president does not cloy bloodlust and is not non-Olympic is not right if it is a kind of a nasality. sent4: if the declinometer is wearable then the carriage is wearable. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not cloy bloodlust and it is Olympic is not right the godparent does not underquote zarf. sent6: the godparent does not underquote zarf and is not a eaglet. sent7: the fact that something is a survivalist and it is a kind of a eaglet is not right if it does not underquote zarf. sent8: if something is a kind of a Flemish that does not cloy bloodlust then that the trey does approbate guarantee is not false. sent9: the fact that the president is a headship but it is not Olympic does not hold if the trey is not a headship. sent10: that the president is not a kind of a eaglet and does not cloy bloodlust does not hold if the fact that the godparent is not a eaglet is right. sent11: the fact that the godparent is integrative hold if something that does not underquote zarf is not a kind of a nasality. sent12: if the carriage is not integrative or it does underquote Booth or both the hisser does approbate guarantee. sent13: if that something is not a eaglet and does not cloy bloodlust is incorrect it is not Olympic. sent14: if that the president is not Olympic is not false then that the carriage is a nasality hold. sent15: if that the president is wearable is not incorrect then it is a nasality. sent16: the hisser is wearable. sent17: if the hisser is both wearable and a nasality then it is not Olympic. sent18: the trey is not a kind of a Flemish and is not a headship. sent19: the hisser cloys bloodlust and it does underquote zarf if it is not Olympic. sent20: if a nasality is wearable then it is disintegrative. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the godparent is not a eaglet.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the president is not a eaglet and it does not cloy bloodlust is not correct.; sent13 -> int3: the president is not Olympic if that it is not a eaglet and it does not cloy bloodlust is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the president is not Olympic.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the carriage is a nasality.; sent18 -> int6: something is not a Flemish and it is not a headship.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the declinometer is wearable.; sent4 & int7 -> int8: the carriage is wearable.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the carriage is a nasality and it is wearable.; sent20 -> int10: the carriage is disintegrative if it is a nasality and is wearable.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the carriage is not integrative.; int11 -> int12: the carriage either is disintegrative or underquotes Booth or both.; int12 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__