the adaptation is a kind of a sloop that is not clear if the brazil is not a machilid.
sent1: if something is non-apocryphal and is a shiftlessness then it is not a Mantispidae. sent2: the brazil is both not apocryphal and a shiftlessness if it is not a machilid. sent3: if something is not non-sabbatical it is a kind of a sloop and is not a clear. sent4: the adaptation is a sabbatical if the brazil is not a Mantispidae. sent5: the brazil is a kind of a shiftlessness if that it is not a machilid is not incorrect. sent6: the litmus is a kind of a click-clack that does not acknowledge.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brazil is not a machilid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the brazil is non-apocryphal thing that is a kind of a shiftlessness.; sent1 -> int2: if the brazil is not apocryphal but it is a kind of a shiftlessness it is not a Mantispidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the brazil is not a Mantispidae.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the adaptation is a sabbatical hold.; sent3 -> int5: if the adaptation is a sabbatical then it is a kind of a sloop that is not a kind of a clear.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the adaptation is a sloop but it is not a kind of a clear.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the adaptation is a kind of a sloop that is not clear if the brazil is not a machilid. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-apocryphal and is a shiftlessness then it is not a Mantispidae. sent2: the brazil is both not apocryphal and a shiftlessness if it is not a machilid. sent3: if something is not non-sabbatical it is a kind of a sloop and is not a clear. sent4: the adaptation is a sabbatical if the brazil is not a Mantispidae. sent5: the brazil is a kind of a shiftlessness if that it is not a machilid is not incorrect. sent6: the litmus is a kind of a click-clack that does not acknowledge. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brazil is not a machilid.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the brazil is non-apocryphal thing that is a kind of a shiftlessness.; sent1 -> int2: if the brazil is not apocryphal but it is a kind of a shiftlessness it is not a Mantispidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the brazil is not a Mantispidae.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the adaptation is a sabbatical hold.; sent3 -> int5: if the adaptation is a sabbatical then it is a kind of a sloop that is not a kind of a clear.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the adaptation is a sloop but it is not a kind of a clear.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__