that something is not a harlequin-snake and monetizes cohesiveness does not hold.
sent1: the surface does not mesh guesstimate. sent2: if something is a kind of a harlequin-snake it is not a manservant and not Donnean. sent3: The guesstimate does not mesh surface. sent4: the surface is musicological. sent5: the surface is not Donnean if there exists something such that the fact that it is geophysical thing that does not mesh guesstimate is wrong. sent6: the cornstarch is not impervious but it is dysphemistic. sent7: the armhole is not dysphemistic. sent8: if the surface is not Donnean then the bridal-wreath is not geophysical. sent9: something does mesh cope and does not whiff Sibelius. sent10: if something is not a therapist and does symbolize it monetizes BAR. sent11: if something is not Donnean then that it is not a kind of a manservant is right. sent12: that the surface is not a kind of a harlequin-snake if the fact that the bridal-wreath is not a manservant is correct is not wrong. sent13: the surface is dysphemistic. sent14: the surface is not a manservant if the bridal-wreath is not a manservant and it is not Donnean. sent15: the surface is geophysical and it is dysphemistic. sent16: there exists something such that that it meshes cope and it whiffs Sibelius is false. sent17: the bridal-wreath is non-arthralgic thing that is a pustule. sent18: if the surface does not whiff simper and is Donnean it is an inverse. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it monetizes cohesiveness hold. sent20: there is something such that it is not a kind of a harlequin-snake. sent21: if there is something such that that it monetizes cohesiveness and it is not Donnean is not right then the bridal-wreath is not geophysical. sent22: something is a harlequin-snake and it does monetize cohesiveness. sent23: if there is something such that that it does mesh cope and it does not whiff Sibelius is not right then the bridal-wreath is not Donnean. sent24: the fact that something is a kind of non-dysphemistic thing that is a kind of a manservant is not false. sent25: if there exists something such that it whiffs Sibelius then that the bridal-wreath is not Donnean is not false. sent26: if the fact that something does not acquire is correct then it is not attitudinal. sent27: if something that does not mesh guesstimate is geophysical then the fact that that it does not monetize cohesiveness is incorrect is true. sent28: there exists something such that that it meshes cope and it does not whiff Sibelius is false.
sent28 & sent23 -> int1: the bridal-wreath is not Donnean.; sent11 -> int2: the bridal-wreath is not a manservant if it is not Donnean.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bridal-wreath is not a manservant.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the surface is not a harlequin-snake.; sent27 -> int5: the surface monetizes cohesiveness if it does not mesh guesstimate and it is geophysical.; sent15 -> int6: that the surface is geophysical is not wrong.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the surface does not mesh guesstimate and is geophysical.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the surface does monetize cohesiveness.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the surface is not a kind of a harlequin-snake and monetizes cohesiveness.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the surface is not a manservant is true.
sent2 -> int10: the bridal-wreath is not a manservant and it is not Donnean if it is a harlequin-snake.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is not a harlequin-snake and monetizes cohesiveness does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the surface does not mesh guesstimate. sent2: if something is a kind of a harlequin-snake it is not a manservant and not Donnean. sent3: The guesstimate does not mesh surface. sent4: the surface is musicological. sent5: the surface is not Donnean if there exists something such that the fact that it is geophysical thing that does not mesh guesstimate is wrong. sent6: the cornstarch is not impervious but it is dysphemistic. sent7: the armhole is not dysphemistic. sent8: if the surface is not Donnean then the bridal-wreath is not geophysical. sent9: something does mesh cope and does not whiff Sibelius. sent10: if something is not a therapist and does symbolize it monetizes BAR. sent11: if something is not Donnean then that it is not a kind of a manservant is right. sent12: that the surface is not a kind of a harlequin-snake if the fact that the bridal-wreath is not a manservant is correct is not wrong. sent13: the surface is dysphemistic. sent14: the surface is not a manservant if the bridal-wreath is not a manservant and it is not Donnean. sent15: the surface is geophysical and it is dysphemistic. sent16: there exists something such that that it meshes cope and it whiffs Sibelius is false. sent17: the bridal-wreath is non-arthralgic thing that is a pustule. sent18: if the surface does not whiff simper and is Donnean it is an inverse. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it monetizes cohesiveness hold. sent20: there is something such that it is not a kind of a harlequin-snake. sent21: if there is something such that that it monetizes cohesiveness and it is not Donnean is not right then the bridal-wreath is not geophysical. sent22: something is a harlequin-snake and it does monetize cohesiveness. sent23: if there is something such that that it does mesh cope and it does not whiff Sibelius is not right then the bridal-wreath is not Donnean. sent24: the fact that something is a kind of non-dysphemistic thing that is a kind of a manservant is not false. sent25: if there exists something such that it whiffs Sibelius then that the bridal-wreath is not Donnean is not false. sent26: if the fact that something does not acquire is correct then it is not attitudinal. sent27: if something that does not mesh guesstimate is geophysical then the fact that that it does not monetize cohesiveness is incorrect is true. sent28: there exists something such that that it meshes cope and it does not whiff Sibelius is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent28 & sent23 -> int1: the bridal-wreath is not Donnean.; sent11 -> int2: the bridal-wreath is not a manservant if it is not Donnean.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bridal-wreath is not a manservant.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the surface is not a harlequin-snake.; sent27 -> int5: the surface monetizes cohesiveness if it does not mesh guesstimate and it is geophysical.; sent15 -> int6: that the surface is geophysical is not wrong.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the surface does not mesh guesstimate and is geophysical.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the surface does monetize cohesiveness.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the surface is not a kind of a harlequin-snake and monetizes cohesiveness.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__