that the snuffers does brace but it is not a Laos is not correct.
sent1: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is both a trembles and not a wanter is correct is not correct then the Aramean is a kind of a wanter. sent2: if the snuffers is not a flagellate that it is a Laos and it is a kind of a shirtdress does not hold. sent3: that the snuffers is both an impersonation and a Cakchiquel does not hold. sent4: the kabob is not a wanter if the ratatouille trembles and/or does laicize Mallotus. sent5: the snuffers is not a kind of a Cakchiquel if that it is an impersonation and a Cakchiquel is false. sent6: the Aramean is a kind of a braced if the ratatouille is not a trembles. sent7: the fact that something does not laicize Mallotus but it does brace is incorrect if it is not a kind of a shirtdress. sent8: the kabob is a wanter. sent9: the snuffers is not a flagellate if it is not a kind of a Cakchiquel. sent10: the kabob is not a shirtdress if there is something such that the fact that it is a Laos that is a kind of a shirtdress is false. sent11: the fact that the snuffers is a braced and it is a kind of a Laos is not correct if the Aramean braced. sent12: if the ratatouille laicizes Mallotus the fact that the kabob is not a wanter is not wrong. sent13: the ratatouille is a wanter. sent14: if something does laicize Mallotus that it is a trembles that is not a wanter is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratatouille is a trembles.; assump1 -> int1: either the ratatouille is a trembles or it does laicize Mallotus or both.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the kabob is not a wanter.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ratatouille does not tremble.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Aramean is a kind of a braced.;
the Aramean is a kind of a wanter.
sent14 -> int6: if the ratatouille laicizes Mallotus then that it is a kind of a trembles and is not a wanter is not right.; sent7 -> int7: if the kabob is not a kind of a shirtdress that it does not laicize Mallotus and it is a braced is not right.; sent5 & sent3 -> int8: the snuffers is not a Cakchiquel.; sent9 & int8 -> int9: the snuffers is not a flagellate.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the snuffers is both Laos and a shirtdress does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that that it is a kind of Laos thing that is a shirtdress is right does not hold.; int11 & sent10 -> int12: the kabob is not a shirtdress.; int7 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the kabob does not laicize Mallotus and is a braced does not hold.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that that it does not laicize Mallotus and is a braced is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the snuffers does brace but it is not a Laos is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is both a trembles and not a wanter is correct is not correct then the Aramean is a kind of a wanter. sent2: if the snuffers is not a flagellate that it is a Laos and it is a kind of a shirtdress does not hold. sent3: that the snuffers is both an impersonation and a Cakchiquel does not hold. sent4: the kabob is not a wanter if the ratatouille trembles and/or does laicize Mallotus. sent5: the snuffers is not a kind of a Cakchiquel if that it is an impersonation and a Cakchiquel is false. sent6: the Aramean is a kind of a braced if the ratatouille is not a trembles. sent7: the fact that something does not laicize Mallotus but it does brace is incorrect if it is not a kind of a shirtdress. sent8: the kabob is a wanter. sent9: the snuffers is not a flagellate if it is not a kind of a Cakchiquel. sent10: the kabob is not a shirtdress if there is something such that the fact that it is a Laos that is a kind of a shirtdress is false. sent11: the fact that the snuffers is a braced and it is a kind of a Laos is not correct if the Aramean braced. sent12: if the ratatouille laicizes Mallotus the fact that the kabob is not a wanter is not wrong. sent13: the ratatouille is a wanter. sent14: if something does laicize Mallotus that it is a trembles that is not a wanter is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ratatouille is a trembles.; assump1 -> int1: either the ratatouille is a trembles or it does laicize Mallotus or both.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the kabob is not a wanter.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the ratatouille does not tremble.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Aramean is a kind of a braced.; __UNKNOWN__