the jeep does not sag mountebank.
sent1: that the jeep is not a Hymen and it is not a discomfort is not correct if something is a kind of a Hymen. sent2: something is astomatal if the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a Hymen and it is not a discomfort hold is wrong. sent3: the fact that the jeep is not bicapsular and it is not a kind of a tomtit does not hold. sent4: that the jeep is not a kind of a Pindar but it does depose is false. sent5: if something that is a kind of a Pindar is astomatal then it does not sag mountebank. sent6: the jeep is inappropriate. sent7: the jeep is a kind of a Pindar if the luthier deposes. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a tomtit then the fact that the fact that the luthier is not a kind of a tomtit but it does sag mountebank is not wrong does not hold. sent9: the metal does sag mountebank and is a argentinosaur. sent10: that the Plimsoll is a tomtit and not reverse is wrong if something is a kind of a tomtit. sent11: that the jeep is a Hymen that is not a discomfort is incorrect if there is something such that it is a Hymen. sent12: if that something is not a lust and it is not a metamorphism is not true then it is magisterial. sent13: the jeep is a substantiality. sent14: the fact that the luthier deposes and is a tomtit is not wrong. sent15: the luthier does sag mountebank. sent16: something is astomatal if it is a Hymen.
sent14 -> int1: the luthier does depose.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the jeep is a kind of a Pindar is true.; sent2 -> int3: if the fact that the jeep is both not a Hymen and not a discomfort does not hold then it is astomatal.; sent5 -> int4: the jeep does not sag mountebank if it is a Pindar and astomatal.;
$hypothesis$ = the jeep does not sag mountebank. ; $context$ = sent1: that the jeep is not a Hymen and it is not a discomfort is not correct if something is a kind of a Hymen. sent2: something is astomatal if the fact that the fact that it is not a kind of a Hymen and it is not a discomfort hold is wrong. sent3: the fact that the jeep is not bicapsular and it is not a kind of a tomtit does not hold. sent4: that the jeep is not a kind of a Pindar but it does depose is false. sent5: if something that is a kind of a Pindar is astomatal then it does not sag mountebank. sent6: the jeep is inappropriate. sent7: the jeep is a kind of a Pindar if the luthier deposes. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a tomtit then the fact that the fact that the luthier is not a kind of a tomtit but it does sag mountebank is not wrong does not hold. sent9: the metal does sag mountebank and is a argentinosaur. sent10: that the Plimsoll is a tomtit and not reverse is wrong if something is a kind of a tomtit. sent11: that the jeep is a Hymen that is not a discomfort is incorrect if there is something such that it is a Hymen. sent12: if that something is not a lust and it is not a metamorphism is not true then it is magisterial. sent13: the jeep is a substantiality. sent14: the fact that the luthier deposes and is a tomtit is not wrong. sent15: the luthier does sag mountebank. sent16: something is astomatal if it is a Hymen. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the luthier does depose.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the jeep is a kind of a Pindar is true.; sent2 -> int3: if the fact that the jeep is both not a Hymen and not a discomfort does not hold then it is astomatal.; sent5 -> int4: the jeep does not sag mountebank if it is a Pindar and astomatal.; __UNKNOWN__