the fact that the counterterrorist claps and it reissues pullulation is false.
sent1: the venter consternates eraser if the gasket does not consternates eraser or it does not snowball Don or both. sent2: if something is a kind of a gibberish then the fact that it is a Haldane is not false. sent3: the fact that the gasket is Adonic hold. sent4: if the bioscope does not snowball Don then that the counterterrorist does clap and does reissue pullulation does not hold. sent5: if the counterterrorist is a kind of a Chilomastix or is not a kind of a surface or both then it is a Chilomastix. sent6: something does not consternate eraser or it does not snowball Don or both if it is a Haldane. sent7: the counterterrorist is a Chilomastix. sent8: there exists something such that it does consternate venter. sent9: if the counterterrorist is not a kind of a gibberish it does consternate eraser. sent10: if there exists something such that it consternates venter then the bioscope is a gibberish and it is a kind of a Chilomastix. sent11: something does clap if it consternates eraser. sent12: the venter is a Aristotelian if the bioscope does not consternate bioscope. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does not consternate venter and is not a kind of a sortition is not right then that the counterterrorist is a gibberish is wrong. sent14: if the gasket is a Adonic that the fact that it does not consternate venter and is not a sortition hold is not correct. sent15: if the fact that something consternates bioscope but it does not reissue pullulation is not right then it reissue pullulation. sent16: that something does consternate bioscope and does not reissue pullulation is incorrect if the fact that it does not snowball Don is right. sent17: if something that is not a rapier consternates wrestle then the gasket consternates eraser. sent18: something that snowballs Don and consternates bioscope is not a kind of a Haldane. sent19: the counterterrorist does not reissue pullulation and is a gibberish if it is not a Chilomastix. sent20: if something that does not reissue pullulation is a gibberish the fact that the bioscope does not consternate bioscope is not incorrect. sent21: the venter is not a kind of a rapier but it does consternate wrestle.
sent21 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a kind of a rapier and does consternate wrestle.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the gasket does consternate eraser.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bioscope does snowball Don.; sent18 -> int3: that the bioscope is not a kind of a Haldane is not wrong if it snowballs Don and it consternates bioscope.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the bioscope is a kind of a gibberish hold then it is a kind of a Haldane.; sent8 & sent10 -> int5: the bioscope is a gibberish and it is a kind of a Chilomastix.; int5 -> int6: the bioscope is a gibberish.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the bioscope is a Haldane.;
the venter is Aristotelian thing that consternates eraser.
sent6 -> int8: if the gasket is a Haldane that it either does not consternate eraser or does not snowball Don or both is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the counterterrorist claps and it reissues pullulation is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the venter consternates eraser if the gasket does not consternates eraser or it does not snowball Don or both. sent2: if something is a kind of a gibberish then the fact that it is a Haldane is not false. sent3: the fact that the gasket is Adonic hold. sent4: if the bioscope does not snowball Don then that the counterterrorist does clap and does reissue pullulation does not hold. sent5: if the counterterrorist is a kind of a Chilomastix or is not a kind of a surface or both then it is a Chilomastix. sent6: something does not consternate eraser or it does not snowball Don or both if it is a Haldane. sent7: the counterterrorist is a Chilomastix. sent8: there exists something such that it does consternate venter. sent9: if the counterterrorist is not a kind of a gibberish it does consternate eraser. sent10: if there exists something such that it consternates venter then the bioscope is a gibberish and it is a kind of a Chilomastix. sent11: something does clap if it consternates eraser. sent12: the venter is a Aristotelian if the bioscope does not consternate bioscope. sent13: if there exists something such that that it does not consternate venter and is not a kind of a sortition is not right then that the counterterrorist is a gibberish is wrong. sent14: if the gasket is a Adonic that the fact that it does not consternate venter and is not a sortition hold is not correct. sent15: if the fact that something consternates bioscope but it does not reissue pullulation is not right then it reissue pullulation. sent16: that something does consternate bioscope and does not reissue pullulation is incorrect if the fact that it does not snowball Don is right. sent17: if something that is not a rapier consternates wrestle then the gasket consternates eraser. sent18: something that snowballs Don and consternates bioscope is not a kind of a Haldane. sent19: the counterterrorist does not reissue pullulation and is a gibberish if it is not a Chilomastix. sent20: if something that does not reissue pullulation is a gibberish the fact that the bioscope does not consternate bioscope is not incorrect. sent21: the venter is not a kind of a rapier but it does consternate wrestle. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 -> int1: there is something such that it is not a kind of a rapier and does consternate wrestle.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the gasket does consternate eraser.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bioscope does snowball Don.; sent18 -> int3: that the bioscope is not a kind of a Haldane is not wrong if it snowballs Don and it consternates bioscope.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the bioscope is a kind of a gibberish hold then it is a kind of a Haldane.; sent8 & sent10 -> int5: the bioscope is a gibberish and it is a kind of a Chilomastix.; int5 -> int6: the bioscope is a gibberish.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the bioscope is a Haldane.; __UNKNOWN__