the fluorapatite does blacklist exposure but it is not a kind of a Erigeron.
sent1: that the mimeograph is a goldfields that is a tulipwood is not right. sent2: there is something such that it is an electricity. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Wiffle. sent4: the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter if there is something such that it is not a Wiffle. sent5: if the bestiality is not a tulipwood then that the mimeograph is a goldfields and it is a tulipwood is not true. sent6: if the bestiality is not a tulipwood then that the mimeograph is not a goldfields but it is a tulipwood is wrong. sent7: the bestiality is not a welcome if that the mimeograph does not impinge Connecticuter but it is a welcome is false. sent8: if the pyrethrum does not blacklist exposure the fluorapatite does blacklist exposure and is not a Erigeron. sent9: something is a Wiffle and it does welcome if it is not a kind of a tulipwood. sent10: if the bestiality either is a Wiffle or is a welcome or both it is not a kind of a tulipwood. sent11: the bestiality is a kind of a Wiffle that is not a kind of a goldfields if the mimeograph is not a Wiffle. sent12: the fact that something does blacklist exposure and is not a Erigeron does not hold if that it is not a Wiffle is not wrong. sent13: something that does not impinge Connecticuter and is not non-heuristic does not blacklist exposure. sent14: the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter. sent15: if the pyrethrum does impinge Connecticuter and it is heuristic then it does not blacklist exposure. sent16: the mimeograph is not a kind of a goldfields. sent17: if that the bestiality does welcome is right then it is not a tulipwood. sent18: the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter but it is a heuristic if there is something such that it is not a Wiffle. sent19: the mimeograph is not a kind of a goldfields if there is something such that it is not an electricity. sent20: if the pyrethrum does not blacklist exposure the fluorapatite is not a Erigeron. sent21: if something that does impinge Connecticuter is heuristic it does not blacklist exposure. sent22: the fluorapatite is not a Erigeron. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an electricity the mimeograph is both not a goldfields and a tulipwood. sent24: the clarinetist is both non-changeless and not non-heuristic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bestiality is a Wiffle.; assump1 -> int1: the bestiality is a kind of a Wiffle and/or welcomes.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the bestiality is not a tulipwood.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the mimeograph is not a kind of a goldfields but it is a tulipwood is incorrect.; sent13 -> int4: if the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter but it is a heuristic it does not blacklist exposure.;
the fact that the fluorapatite blacklists exposure but it is not a Erigeron is not correct.
sent12 -> int5: if the fluorapatite is not a Wiffle then that it blacklists exposure and it is not a Erigeron is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fluorapatite does blacklist exposure but it is not a kind of a Erigeron. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mimeograph is a goldfields that is a tulipwood is not right. sent2: there is something such that it is an electricity. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Wiffle. sent4: the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter if there is something such that it is not a Wiffle. sent5: if the bestiality is not a tulipwood then that the mimeograph is a goldfields and it is a tulipwood is not true. sent6: if the bestiality is not a tulipwood then that the mimeograph is not a goldfields but it is a tulipwood is wrong. sent7: the bestiality is not a welcome if that the mimeograph does not impinge Connecticuter but it is a welcome is false. sent8: if the pyrethrum does not blacklist exposure the fluorapatite does blacklist exposure and is not a Erigeron. sent9: something is a Wiffle and it does welcome if it is not a kind of a tulipwood. sent10: if the bestiality either is a Wiffle or is a welcome or both it is not a kind of a tulipwood. sent11: the bestiality is a kind of a Wiffle that is not a kind of a goldfields if the mimeograph is not a Wiffle. sent12: the fact that something does blacklist exposure and is not a Erigeron does not hold if that it is not a Wiffle is not wrong. sent13: something that does not impinge Connecticuter and is not non-heuristic does not blacklist exposure. sent14: the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter. sent15: if the pyrethrum does impinge Connecticuter and it is heuristic then it does not blacklist exposure. sent16: the mimeograph is not a kind of a goldfields. sent17: if that the bestiality does welcome is right then it is not a tulipwood. sent18: the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter but it is a heuristic if there is something such that it is not a Wiffle. sent19: the mimeograph is not a kind of a goldfields if there is something such that it is not an electricity. sent20: if the pyrethrum does not blacklist exposure the fluorapatite is not a Erigeron. sent21: if something that does impinge Connecticuter is heuristic it does not blacklist exposure. sent22: the fluorapatite is not a Erigeron. sent23: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an electricity the mimeograph is both not a goldfields and a tulipwood. sent24: the clarinetist is both non-changeless and not non-heuristic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bestiality is a Wiffle.; assump1 -> int1: the bestiality is a kind of a Wiffle and/or welcomes.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the bestiality is not a tulipwood.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the mimeograph is not a kind of a goldfields but it is a tulipwood is incorrect.; sent13 -> int4: if the pyrethrum does not impinge Connecticuter but it is a heuristic it does not blacklist exposure.; __UNKNOWN__