the impracticalness does not occur.
sent1: the torrentialness occurs. sent2: the fact that the carposporicness but not the sobering happens is not right. sent3: that the salting saddlecloth does not occur and the samba does not occur is not right. sent4: if the calculableness does not occur then the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkling occurs is not correct. sent5: that the cyclonicness happens is prevented by that either the statement or the exteroceptiveness or both occurs. sent6: that the fragmenting redfish but not the twinkle occurs is incorrect if the calculableness does not occur. sent7: the impracticalness does not occur if both the squintiness and the baptism occurs. sent8: that the discountenancing nightshirt does not occur and the compartmentalizing knife-handle does not occur is not correct. sent9: that the fragmenting expurgation happens and/or the pronominal brings about that the damper does not occur. sent10: the impracticalness occurs if the posteriorness happens. sent11: that the commutating does not occur is prevented by the squintiness. sent12: the non-calculableness is caused by the non-obligatedness. sent13: if the baptism happens the commutating happens. sent14: if the calculableness does not occur then the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkling does not occur does not hold. sent15: the posterior happens if the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkle does not occur is not right. sent16: the wingback and/or that the commutating occurs prevents that the obligatedness occurs. sent17: if the fact that both the catadromousness and the baptism happens is not right then the catadromousness does not occur. sent18: the baptism occurs and/or the squintiness happens. sent19: the mud-brickness happens.
sent18 & sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the commutating occurs.; int1 -> int2: the wingback or the commutating or both occurs.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the obligatedness does not occur.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the calculableness does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkle does not occur is false.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: that the posterior happens is true.; sent10 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the impracticalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the impracticalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the torrentialness occurs. sent2: the fact that the carposporicness but not the sobering happens is not right. sent3: that the salting saddlecloth does not occur and the samba does not occur is not right. sent4: if the calculableness does not occur then the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkling occurs is not correct. sent5: that the cyclonicness happens is prevented by that either the statement or the exteroceptiveness or both occurs. sent6: that the fragmenting redfish but not the twinkle occurs is incorrect if the calculableness does not occur. sent7: the impracticalness does not occur if both the squintiness and the baptism occurs. sent8: that the discountenancing nightshirt does not occur and the compartmentalizing knife-handle does not occur is not correct. sent9: that the fragmenting expurgation happens and/or the pronominal brings about that the damper does not occur. sent10: the impracticalness occurs if the posteriorness happens. sent11: that the commutating does not occur is prevented by the squintiness. sent12: the non-calculableness is caused by the non-obligatedness. sent13: if the baptism happens the commutating happens. sent14: if the calculableness does not occur then the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkling does not occur does not hold. sent15: the posterior happens if the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkle does not occur is not right. sent16: the wingback and/or that the commutating occurs prevents that the obligatedness occurs. sent17: if the fact that both the catadromousness and the baptism happens is not right then the catadromousness does not occur. sent18: the baptism occurs and/or the squintiness happens. sent19: the mud-brickness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the commutating occurs.; int1 -> int2: the wingback or the commutating or both occurs.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the obligatedness does not occur.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: the calculableness does not occur.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the fragmenting redfish does not occur and the twinkle does not occur is false.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: that the posterior happens is true.; sent10 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__