that there is something such that if it is not canine the fact that it thinks stint and it does not frighten lend-lease is not right is not true.
sent1: there is something such that if it is impolite then the fact that it does frighten footfault and it is not ethnocentric is not correct. sent2: that the abaca does post surprised and frightens Scorpaenidae is not right if it does not card elapid. sent3: if the abaca is not a kind of a canine then it thinks stint and does not frighten lend-lease. sent4: the fact that the abaca thinks stint and does not frighten lend-lease does not hold if it is not a canine. sent5: there is something such that if it is not secretory that it is a kind of proportionate thing that is a kind of a existentialist is not true.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not canine the fact that it thinks stint and it does not frighten lend-lease is not right is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is impolite then the fact that it does frighten footfault and it is not ethnocentric is not correct. sent2: that the abaca does post surprised and frightens Scorpaenidae is not right if it does not card elapid. sent3: if the abaca is not a kind of a canine then it thinks stint and does not frighten lend-lease. sent4: the fact that the abaca thinks stint and does not frighten lend-lease does not hold if it is not a canine. sent5: there is something such that if it is not secretory that it is a kind of proportionate thing that is a kind of a existentialist is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__