the fact that the demoniac is not a glyceride is true.
sent1: if something either stabs serval or is not a glyceride or both then it is not a glyceride. sent2: the Chapman is not a burgundy if it does stab cheapskate or is not androgenic or both. sent3: the Chapman stabs cheapskate and/or it is not androgenic if it is not a materiality. sent4: that the lightwood is lentic and stabs merlin does not hold if the Chapman is not a burgundy. sent5: the demoniac is roentgenographic if the congee is roentgenographic. sent6: the congee does stab serval. sent7: that the mulligatawny is not lentic if the fact that the lightwood is lentic and it stabs merlin is not true is not incorrect. sent8: a roentgenographic thing does stab serval and/or is not a glyceride. sent9: something is roentgenographic if it is non-anthropological. sent10: The serval does stab congee. sent11: that the demoniac is a glyceride hold if there exists something such that it is roentgenographic or it stabs serval or both. sent12: the demoniac is a glyceride if something is roentgenographic.
sent6 -> int1: either the congee is roentgenographic or it stabs serval or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is roentgenographic or it does stab serval or both.; int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the demoniac is not a glyceride.
sent1 -> int3: if the demoniac stabs serval and/or is not a kind of a glyceride it is not a glyceride.; sent8 -> int4: either the demoniac does stab serval or it is not a glyceride or both if the fact that it is roentgenographic is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int5: that the congee is roentgenographic is correct if it is not anthropological.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the demoniac is not a glyceride is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something either stabs serval or is not a glyceride or both then it is not a glyceride. sent2: the Chapman is not a burgundy if it does stab cheapskate or is not androgenic or both. sent3: the Chapman stabs cheapskate and/or it is not androgenic if it is not a materiality. sent4: that the lightwood is lentic and stabs merlin does not hold if the Chapman is not a burgundy. sent5: the demoniac is roentgenographic if the congee is roentgenographic. sent6: the congee does stab serval. sent7: that the mulligatawny is not lentic if the fact that the lightwood is lentic and it stabs merlin is not true is not incorrect. sent8: a roentgenographic thing does stab serval and/or is not a glyceride. sent9: something is roentgenographic if it is non-anthropological. sent10: The serval does stab congee. sent11: that the demoniac is a glyceride hold if there exists something such that it is roentgenographic or it stabs serval or both. sent12: the demoniac is a glyceride if something is roentgenographic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: either the congee is roentgenographic or it stabs serval or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is roentgenographic or it does stab serval or both.; int2 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__