the fact that that the repoting grantor occurs prevents the patrolling is not right.
sent1: the non-tramontaneness is prevented by that the fetometry but not the dominant happens. sent2: if both the tramontaneness and the repoting grantor occurs then the patrolling does not occur. sent3: both the fetometry and the non-dominantness occurs.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the tramontaneness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repoting grantor occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tramontaneness happens and the repoting grantor occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the patrolling does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the repoting grantor occurs prevents the patrolling is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-tramontaneness is prevented by that the fetometry but not the dominant happens. sent2: if both the tramontaneness and the repoting grantor occurs then the patrolling does not occur. sent3: both the fetometry and the non-dominantness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the tramontaneness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the repoting grantor occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tramontaneness happens and the repoting grantor occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the patrolling does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__