if the chlorine is culinary then the conformation pegs indusium and/or it does not confuse interoperability.
sent1: if the Kaiser is not a kind of a Haitian the chlorine does not droop and it is not vocational. sent2: if something does not droop and is not vocational it is nice. sent3: the Kaiser is not a Haitian. sent4: the haslet is not a Beaumont if the chlorine is nice and is culinary. sent5: the fact that if the fact that the haslet is not a kind of a Beaumont is true the conformation pegs indusium or does not confuse interoperability or both is right.
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the chlorine does not droop and is not vocational.; sent2 -> int2: if the chlorine does not droop and it is not vocational it is nice.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chlorine is nice.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chlorine is culinary.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the chlorine is nice and it is culinary.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the haslet is not a kind of a Beaumont hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the conformation pegs indusium and/or it does not confuse interoperability.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the chlorine is culinary then the conformation pegs indusium and/or it does not confuse interoperability. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Kaiser is not a kind of a Haitian the chlorine does not droop and it is not vocational. sent2: if something does not droop and is not vocational it is nice. sent3: the Kaiser is not a Haitian. sent4: the haslet is not a Beaumont if the chlorine is nice and is culinary. sent5: the fact that if the fact that the haslet is not a kind of a Beaumont is true the conformation pegs indusium or does not confuse interoperability or both is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent3 -> int1: the chlorine does not droop and is not vocational.; sent2 -> int2: if the chlorine does not droop and it is not vocational it is nice.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the chlorine is nice.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chlorine is culinary.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the chlorine is nice and it is culinary.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the haslet is not a kind of a Beaumont hold.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the conformation pegs indusium and/or it does not confuse interoperability.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__