the Booleanness happens.
sent1: that both the beating and the angioplasty occurs does not hold. sent2: the chronologicalness does not occur if that the apsidalness does not occur and the alternation does not occur is false. sent3: that the stigmatizing warble does not occur is prevented by that the spiel occurs. sent4: if the stigmatizing antecedent does not occur then that the bloomer does not occur and the hostility does not occur is false. sent5: if the fact that the bloomer does not occur and the hostility does not occur does not hold then the newness does not occur. sent6: the psychologicalness does not occur. sent7: that the stigmatizing antecedent does not occur is triggered by that both the cytophotometry and the Booleanness occurs. sent8: the disqualification happens. sent9: that the cometariness happens is prevented by that the lieutenancy occurs. sent10: if the permitting ice does not occur then the fact that the treason happens is not false. sent11: the fact that the snickersnee does not occur but the reproduction happens is false. sent12: the wearableness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the hang does not occur but the historiography happens does not hold. sent14: if the psychologicalness does not occur the carboniferousness and the newness happens. sent15: that the measuring happens and the carrot happens does not hold. sent16: the fact that not the bloomer but the hostility occurs is incorrect. sent17: if that the snickersnee does not occur but the reproduction happens is incorrect then the cytophotometry happens. sent18: the booting Aporocactus happens. sent19: the Riemannianness happens and the coronariness occurs.
sent17 & sent11 -> int1: the cytophotometry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Booleanness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cytophotometry happens and the Booleanness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the stigmatizing antecedent does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the bloomer does not occur and the hostility does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the newness does not occur is correct.; sent14 & sent6 -> int6: both the carboniferousness and the newness happens.; int6 -> int7: the newness occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Booleanness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the beating and the angioplasty occurs does not hold. sent2: the chronologicalness does not occur if that the apsidalness does not occur and the alternation does not occur is false. sent3: that the stigmatizing warble does not occur is prevented by that the spiel occurs. sent4: if the stigmatizing antecedent does not occur then that the bloomer does not occur and the hostility does not occur is false. sent5: if the fact that the bloomer does not occur and the hostility does not occur does not hold then the newness does not occur. sent6: the psychologicalness does not occur. sent7: that the stigmatizing antecedent does not occur is triggered by that both the cytophotometry and the Booleanness occurs. sent8: the disqualification happens. sent9: that the cometariness happens is prevented by that the lieutenancy occurs. sent10: if the permitting ice does not occur then the fact that the treason happens is not false. sent11: the fact that the snickersnee does not occur but the reproduction happens is false. sent12: the wearableness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the hang does not occur but the historiography happens does not hold. sent14: if the psychologicalness does not occur the carboniferousness and the newness happens. sent15: that the measuring happens and the carrot happens does not hold. sent16: the fact that not the bloomer but the hostility occurs is incorrect. sent17: if that the snickersnee does not occur but the reproduction happens is incorrect then the cytophotometry happens. sent18: the booting Aporocactus happens. sent19: the Riemannianness happens and the coronariness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent11 -> int1: the cytophotometry happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Booleanness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cytophotometry happens and the Booleanness occurs.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the stigmatizing antecedent does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the bloomer does not occur and the hostility does not occur is incorrect.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the newness does not occur is correct.; sent14 & sent6 -> int6: both the carboniferousness and the newness happens.; int6 -> int7: the newness occurs.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__