that the metaproterenol is a kind of a Mariehamn if the fact that the heretic is distinguishable is not false is incorrect.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not distinguishable is right the fact that the heretic is a kind of a ribbon that is a cathedral does not hold. sent2: if the heretic is not a kind of a cathedral then the fact that the antibacterial is a cope and is not a cathedral does not hold. sent3: something is not a ribbon if that it does cope and it is not cathedral is incorrect. sent4: something is not a ribbon if it does not cope. sent5: that something does not unfasten metaproterenol and/or is not a Mariehamn is not correct if it is not a cathedral. sent6: if the heretic is cathedral then it is not distinguishable. sent7: the metaproterenol is a Mariehamn if the fact that the endomorph either does not poultice overcharge or does not patronage splenius or both does not hold. sent8: if the antibacterial does not cope then it is not a ribbon. sent9: the fact that the endomorph does not poultice overcharge and/or it does not patronage splenius is not true if the antibacterial is not a ribbon.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the heretic is a kind of a cathedral.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: that the heretic is not distinguishable is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the heretic is distinguishable is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the heretic is not a cathedral.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the antibacterial is both a cope and not a cathedral is not correct.; sent3 -> int5: the antibacterial is not a ribbon if the fact that it does cope and it is not a cathedral does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antibacterial is not a ribbon.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the endomorph does not poultice overcharge and/or does not patronage splenius is wrong.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the metaproterenol is a Mariehamn.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the helmet does not unfasten metaproterenol or is not a Mariehamn or both is wrong.
sent5 -> int9: that the helmet does not unfasten metaproterenol and/or is not a Mariehamn is incorrect if it is not a cathedral.;
$hypothesis$ = that the metaproterenol is a kind of a Mariehamn if the fact that the heretic is distinguishable is not false is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not distinguishable is right the fact that the heretic is a kind of a ribbon that is a cathedral does not hold. sent2: if the heretic is not a kind of a cathedral then the fact that the antibacterial is a cope and is not a cathedral does not hold. sent3: something is not a ribbon if that it does cope and it is not cathedral is incorrect. sent4: something is not a ribbon if it does not cope. sent5: that something does not unfasten metaproterenol and/or is not a Mariehamn is not correct if it is not a cathedral. sent6: if the heretic is cathedral then it is not distinguishable. sent7: the metaproterenol is a Mariehamn if the fact that the endomorph either does not poultice overcharge or does not patronage splenius or both does not hold. sent8: if the antibacterial does not cope then it is not a ribbon. sent9: the fact that the endomorph does not poultice overcharge and/or it does not patronage splenius is not true if the antibacterial is not a ribbon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the heretic is a kind of a cathedral.; sent6 & assump2 -> int1: that the heretic is not distinguishable is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the heretic is distinguishable is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the heretic is not a cathedral.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: that the antibacterial is both a cope and not a cathedral is not correct.; sent3 -> int5: the antibacterial is not a ribbon if the fact that it does cope and it is not a cathedral does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the antibacterial is not a ribbon.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the endomorph does not poultice overcharge and/or does not patronage splenius is wrong.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the metaproterenol is a Mariehamn.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__