the fact that the ern is either Nigerian or a googly or both is not right.
sent1: if something does damp ern the anaglyph is not a spermicide. sent2: the anaglyph is not a spermicide. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a spermicide. sent4: that the anaglyph is a Nigerian hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is a fantan or it is a kind of a spermicide or both is not correct. sent5: the ern is a Nigerian if there is something such that the fact that it is a fantan and/or a spermicide is not right. sent6: the anaglyph is a spermicide if there exists something such that that it is a fantan and/or it is Nigerian is wrong. sent7: that the ern is a macaroon or it is a velum or both is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that it damps ern. sent9: something is not a fantan. sent10: something does not damp ern if it is not a fantan. sent11: there is something such that it is a fantan and/or it is a spermicide. sent12: if something damps ern then that the fact that the anaglyph is a fantan and/or it is a kind of a spermicide is incorrect is not false. sent13: that that the ern is a googly and/or a spermicide is correct does not hold. sent14: the anaglyph is a Nigerian and/or it is a spermicide. sent15: that the anaglyph is membranous and/or it is carotid is not correct. sent16: if that something does not damp ern and is not a fantan hold then it damps obtuseness. sent17: that either the anaglyph is aeronautical or it is a Nigerian or both is incorrect if something is a hexahedron. sent18: there exists something such that that it either does crow trill or is nonarbitrary or both is not right. sent19: there is something such that it is a kind of a capsule. sent20: the anaglyph is a spermicide if there exists something such that the fact that it either is a googly or is a fantan or both is incorrect. sent21: the anaglyph is a kind of a googly if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a spermicide or it is a kind of a Nigerian or both is not right. sent22: something is a googly. sent23: there exists something such that that it is either a Cynodon or euphonic or both is wrong.
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: that the anaglyph is a kind of a fantan and/or it is a spermicide is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a fantan and/or is a spermicide is not true.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the ern is Nigerian is not wrong.; int3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it damps obtuseness.
sent16 -> int4: if the anaglyph does not damp ern and it is not a fantan then it does damp obtuseness.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ern is either Nigerian or a googly or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does damp ern the anaglyph is not a spermicide. sent2: the anaglyph is not a spermicide. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a spermicide. sent4: that the anaglyph is a Nigerian hold if there exists something such that the fact that it is a fantan or it is a kind of a spermicide or both is not correct. sent5: the ern is a Nigerian if there is something such that the fact that it is a fantan and/or a spermicide is not right. sent6: the anaglyph is a spermicide if there exists something such that that it is a fantan and/or it is Nigerian is wrong. sent7: that the ern is a macaroon or it is a velum or both is wrong. sent8: there exists something such that it damps ern. sent9: something is not a fantan. sent10: something does not damp ern if it is not a fantan. sent11: there is something such that it is a fantan and/or it is a spermicide. sent12: if something damps ern then that the fact that the anaglyph is a fantan and/or it is a kind of a spermicide is incorrect is not false. sent13: that that the ern is a googly and/or a spermicide is correct does not hold. sent14: the anaglyph is a Nigerian and/or it is a spermicide. sent15: that the anaglyph is membranous and/or it is carotid is not correct. sent16: if that something does not damp ern and is not a fantan hold then it damps obtuseness. sent17: that either the anaglyph is aeronautical or it is a Nigerian or both is incorrect if something is a hexahedron. sent18: there exists something such that that it either does crow trill or is nonarbitrary or both is not right. sent19: there is something such that it is a kind of a capsule. sent20: the anaglyph is a spermicide if there exists something such that the fact that it either is a googly or is a fantan or both is incorrect. sent21: the anaglyph is a kind of a googly if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a spermicide or it is a kind of a Nigerian or both is not right. sent22: something is a googly. sent23: there exists something such that that it is either a Cynodon or euphonic or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent12 -> int1: that the anaglyph is a kind of a fantan and/or it is a spermicide is not true.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it is a fantan and/or is a spermicide is not true.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the ern is Nigerian is not wrong.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__