the motherwort contradistinguishes mezzo-soprano and is pleasant.
sent1: that something does contradistinguish mezzo-soprano and it is pleasant is not right if it does not sicken. sent2: if the trumpeter does not sicken then the astrodome is not pleasant and it is not cogitative. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a migration and it is not a Stoic is false. sent4: something is a bus if it is typographic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a migration and it is not a Stoic is true does not hold the archbishop does not interleave coleslaw. sent6: that if the trumpeter does not interleave coleslaw then that the motherwort sickens does not hold is right. sent7: something does enthrone if it is a bus. sent8: the astrodome is not eruptive if the demimondaine is a kind of eruptive thing that does not demilitarize subunit. sent9: the ignition is typographic if it is a sandfish and/or is not a Oliver. sent10: if the astrodome is not pleasant then the motherwort does contradistinguish mezzo-soprano and is pleasant. sent11: the archbishop does interleave coleslaw if the trumpeter sickens. sent12: the fact that if something is not eruptive then that it is a syrup and it is a migration is not true is correct. sent13: if the ignition is not a kind of a semiautomatic the demimondaine is not a semiautomatic. sent14: if something enthrones then it is not a semiautomatic and/or it is not a subterfuge. sent15: the motherwort is pleasant. sent16: something is eruptive but it does not demilitarize subunit if it is not a semiautomatic. sent17: if the ignition is not a subterfuge the fact that the demimondaine is not a semiautomatic is not wrong. sent18: the ignition is a sandfish and/or it is not a Oliver. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is a syrup that is a kind of a migration is incorrect the archbishop is not a migration. sent20: the fact that something is a kind of non-cogitative a Stoic is not true if it is not a migration. sent21: the motherwort is pleasant if the astrodome is not pleasant. sent22: the archbishop does not interleave coleslaw if there exists something such that it is a Stoic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trumpeter does sicken.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the archbishop interleaves coleslaw.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the archbishop does not interleave coleslaw.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the trumpeter does not sicken.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the astrodome is not pleasant and not cogitative.; int5 -> int6: the astrodome is not pleasant.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the motherwort does contradistinguish mezzo-soprano and is pleasant is not right.
sent1 -> int7: the fact that the motherwort contradistinguishes mezzo-soprano and it is pleasant is not right if it does not sicken.; sent20 -> int8: if the archbishop is not a kind of a migration that it is a kind of non-cogitative thing that is a kind of a Stoic is not correct.; sent12 -> int9: if the astrodome is not eruptive the fact that it is a syrup and is a migration is not true.; sent16 -> int10: if the demimondaine is not a semiautomatic it is eruptive and does not demilitarize subunit.; sent14 -> int11: the ignition is not a semiautomatic or is not a subterfuge or both if it enthrones.; sent7 -> int12: if the ignition buses it does enthrone.; sent4 -> int13: the ignition is a bus if it is typographic.; sent9 & sent18 -> int14: the ignition is typographic.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the ignition is a bus.; int12 & int15 -> int16: the ignition does enthrone.; int11 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the ignition is not a semiautomatic and/or it is not a subterfuge hold.; int17 & sent13 & sent17 -> int18: the demimondaine is not a semiautomatic.; int10 & int18 -> int19: the demimondaine is eruptive and does not demilitarize subunit.; sent8 & int19 -> int20: the astrodome is not eruptive.; int9 & int20 -> int21: the fact that the astrodome is a kind of a syrup and is a migration is not true.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that that it is both a syrup and a migration does not hold.; int22 & sent19 -> int23: that the archbishop is not a migration is not incorrect.; int8 & int23 -> int24: the fact that that the archbishop is not cogitative but it is Stoic is not false is not true.; int24 -> int25: there exists something such that the fact that it is not cogitative and it is a Stoic is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the motherwort contradistinguishes mezzo-soprano and is pleasant. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does contradistinguish mezzo-soprano and it is pleasant is not right if it does not sicken. sent2: if the trumpeter does not sicken then the astrodome is not pleasant and it is not cogitative. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a migration and it is not a Stoic is false. sent4: something is a bus if it is typographic. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is not a migration and it is not a Stoic is true does not hold the archbishop does not interleave coleslaw. sent6: that if the trumpeter does not interleave coleslaw then that the motherwort sickens does not hold is right. sent7: something does enthrone if it is a bus. sent8: the astrodome is not eruptive if the demimondaine is a kind of eruptive thing that does not demilitarize subunit. sent9: the ignition is typographic if it is a sandfish and/or is not a Oliver. sent10: if the astrodome is not pleasant then the motherwort does contradistinguish mezzo-soprano and is pleasant. sent11: the archbishop does interleave coleslaw if the trumpeter sickens. sent12: the fact that if something is not eruptive then that it is a syrup and it is a migration is not true is correct. sent13: if the ignition is not a kind of a semiautomatic the demimondaine is not a semiautomatic. sent14: if something enthrones then it is not a semiautomatic and/or it is not a subterfuge. sent15: the motherwort is pleasant. sent16: something is eruptive but it does not demilitarize subunit if it is not a semiautomatic. sent17: if the ignition is not a subterfuge the fact that the demimondaine is not a semiautomatic is not wrong. sent18: the ignition is a sandfish and/or it is not a Oliver. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is a syrup that is a kind of a migration is incorrect the archbishop is not a migration. sent20: the fact that something is a kind of non-cogitative a Stoic is not true if it is not a migration. sent21: the motherwort is pleasant if the astrodome is not pleasant. sent22: the archbishop does not interleave coleslaw if there exists something such that it is a Stoic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trumpeter does sicken.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the archbishop interleaves coleslaw.; sent3 & sent5 -> int2: the archbishop does not interleave coleslaw.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the trumpeter does not sicken.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the astrodome is not pleasant and not cogitative.; int5 -> int6: the astrodome is not pleasant.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__