the azimuthalness occurs and the antidotalness occurs.
sent1: the lossiness happens. sent2: that the lossiness occurs results in the galling lansoprazole. sent3: that if that that both the galling denazification and the vicarialness happens is not right hold then the vicarialness does not occur is right. sent4: both the nonresidentness and the stratus happens. sent5: if the frown does not occur then not the contamination but the azimuthalness happens. sent6: the fact that the disobliging antidiabetic occurs and the penetration happens is not true if the antiferromagnetism does not occur. sent7: that the antidotalness does not occur is prevented by that the contamination happens. sent8: the azimuthalness occurs. sent9: if the ransoming does not occur then the fact that both the galling denazification and the vicarialness occurs is false. sent10: if the fact that that the nonslipperiness does not occur and/or the galling sensualist does not occur is correct is incorrect the antiferromagnetism does not occur. sent11: the anaphrodisiacness does not occur if both the continentalness and the non-Macedonianness happens. sent12: that the vicarialness does not occur results in that the frowning does not occur. sent13: the lossiness happens if that the lossinessness and the antidotalness happens is wrong. sent14: if the contamination does not occur then the fact that both the non-lossyness and the antidotalness occurs is false. sent15: if the lossiness does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the azimuthalness and the antidotalness occurs is not right is right. sent16: the disobliging hideaway is brought about by that the hypotensive happens. sent17: the penetration happens. sent18: if that the disobliging antidiabetic and the penetration occurs is not correct then the ransoming does not occur. sent19: that the nonslipperiness does not occur and/or the galling sensualist does not occur does not hold if the anaphrodisiacness does not occur.
the galling lansoprazole occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the azimuthalness occurs and the antidotalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the lossiness happens. sent2: that the lossiness occurs results in the galling lansoprazole. sent3: that if that that both the galling denazification and the vicarialness happens is not right hold then the vicarialness does not occur is right. sent4: both the nonresidentness and the stratus happens. sent5: if the frown does not occur then not the contamination but the azimuthalness happens. sent6: the fact that the disobliging antidiabetic occurs and the penetration happens is not true if the antiferromagnetism does not occur. sent7: that the antidotalness does not occur is prevented by that the contamination happens. sent8: the azimuthalness occurs. sent9: if the ransoming does not occur then the fact that both the galling denazification and the vicarialness occurs is false. sent10: if the fact that that the nonslipperiness does not occur and/or the galling sensualist does not occur is correct is incorrect the antiferromagnetism does not occur. sent11: the anaphrodisiacness does not occur if both the continentalness and the non-Macedonianness happens. sent12: that the vicarialness does not occur results in that the frowning does not occur. sent13: the lossiness happens if that the lossinessness and the antidotalness happens is wrong. sent14: if the contamination does not occur then the fact that both the non-lossyness and the antidotalness occurs is false. sent15: if the lossiness does not occur then the fact that the fact that both the azimuthalness and the antidotalness occurs is not right is right. sent16: the disobliging hideaway is brought about by that the hypotensive happens. sent17: the penetration happens. sent18: if that the disobliging antidiabetic and the penetration occurs is not correct then the ransoming does not occur. sent19: that the nonslipperiness does not occur and/or the galling sensualist does not occur does not hold if the anaphrodisiacness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__