the coadjutor camouflages hydrocele if the two is a Desmanthus.
sent1: the faille is both not an optometrist and geographic. sent2: The clavicle does not maintain two. sent3: the two is not virulent. sent4: the benzene does not camouflage hydrocele if there exists something such that the fact that it does camouflage hydrocele and it is not aponeurotic is not correct. sent5: if the two is non-lactic then the fact that it is not virulent hold. sent6: the fact that the two does camouflage hydrocele and is not aponeurotic is not correct if the coadjutor is not a company. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a vampirism and it is not virulent is false then it does not maintain clavicle. sent8: if the coadjutor does not camouflage hydrocele it is not a vampirism but virulent. sent9: the two is not virulent but it is a kind of a vampirism if it is not lactic. sent10: if something is non-virulent a vampirism the coadjutor does camouflage hydrocele. sent11: the coadjutor does camouflage hydrocele if something that is virulent is a vampirism. sent12: the coadjutor either is not a Corot or is a mildness or both if the clavicle is not a kind of a Georgetown. sent13: that something is not a vampirism and not virulent is false if it does not camouflage hydrocele. sent14: the coadjutor is symmetrical and does not camouflage hydrocele. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Corot or it is a mildness or both then the fact that it is not a company is correct. sent16: the two does not maintain clavicle. sent17: the coadjutor does not camouflage hydrocele but it is disintegrative. sent18: the clavicle is not a Georgetown. sent19: the two is not lactic if it is a kind of a Desmanthus and it does not maintain clavicle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the two is a kind of a Desmanthus.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: the two is a Desmanthus but it does not maintain clavicle.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the two is not lactic.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the two is not virulent but a vampirism.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is both not virulent and a vampirism.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the coadjutor does camouflage hydrocele.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the benzene is lactic.
sent7 -> int6: the benzene does not maintain clavicle if the fact that it is not a vampirism and is not virulent is not true.; sent13 -> int7: that the benzene is not a kind of a vampirism and it is not virulent is wrong if it does not camouflage hydrocele.; sent15 -> int8: the coadjutor is not a company if either it is not a Corot or it is a mildness or both.; sent12 & sent18 -> int9: the coadjutor is not a Corot or it is a mildness or both.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the coadjutor does not company.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: that that the two camouflages hydrocele and is not aponeurotic is not false does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it camouflages hydrocele and it is not aponeurotic is false.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: that the benzene does not camouflage hydrocele hold.; int7 & int13 -> int14: that the benzene is not a vampirism and it is not virulent is not true.; int6 & int14 -> int15: the benzene does not maintain clavicle.;
$hypothesis$ = the coadjutor camouflages hydrocele if the two is a Desmanthus. ; $context$ = sent1: the faille is both not an optometrist and geographic. sent2: The clavicle does not maintain two. sent3: the two is not virulent. sent4: the benzene does not camouflage hydrocele if there exists something such that the fact that it does camouflage hydrocele and it is not aponeurotic is not correct. sent5: if the two is non-lactic then the fact that it is not virulent hold. sent6: the fact that the two does camouflage hydrocele and is not aponeurotic is not correct if the coadjutor is not a company. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a vampirism and it is not virulent is false then it does not maintain clavicle. sent8: if the coadjutor does not camouflage hydrocele it is not a vampirism but virulent. sent9: the two is not virulent but it is a kind of a vampirism if it is not lactic. sent10: if something is non-virulent a vampirism the coadjutor does camouflage hydrocele. sent11: the coadjutor does camouflage hydrocele if something that is virulent is a vampirism. sent12: the coadjutor either is not a Corot or is a mildness or both if the clavicle is not a kind of a Georgetown. sent13: that something is not a vampirism and not virulent is false if it does not camouflage hydrocele. sent14: the coadjutor is symmetrical and does not camouflage hydrocele. sent15: if something is not a kind of a Corot or it is a mildness or both then the fact that it is not a company is correct. sent16: the two does not maintain clavicle. sent17: the coadjutor does not camouflage hydrocele but it is disintegrative. sent18: the clavicle is not a Georgetown. sent19: the two is not lactic if it is a kind of a Desmanthus and it does not maintain clavicle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the two is a kind of a Desmanthus.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: the two is a Desmanthus but it does not maintain clavicle.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the two is not lactic.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the two is not virulent but a vampirism.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is both not virulent and a vampirism.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the coadjutor does camouflage hydrocele.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__