there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a vandyke that it is not a kind of a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both does not hold.
sent1: the backroom is a kind of a rental if it is not a vandyke. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a frail and/or it is not cryptogamic does not hold if it does not irradiate thallium. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a vandyke then it irradiates thallium. sent4: there is something such that if it is not hemodynamics that it is a aftercare and/or is not alveolar is not right. sent5: the fact that the fact that either the backroom is not a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both is not true hold if it is not a vandyke. sent6: that the backroom is not a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both is not wrong if it is not a kind of a vandyke. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a lout then that it is a kind of a summation or it is not continual or both is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a vandyke then that it either is not a rental or does not irradiate thallium or both is incorrect. sent9: if the backroom is not a vandyke then that it is not a rental or does irradiate thallium or both is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a vandyke then either it is not a kind of a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both. sent11: that the backroom does irradiate Nummulitidae hold if it does not irradiate thallium.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the Colbert is not a frail or it is non-cryptogamic or both does not hold if the fact that it does not irradiate thallium is true.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a vandyke that it is not a kind of a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the backroom is a kind of a rental if it is not a vandyke. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a frail and/or it is not cryptogamic does not hold if it does not irradiate thallium. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a vandyke then it irradiates thallium. sent4: there is something such that if it is not hemodynamics that it is a aftercare and/or is not alveolar is not right. sent5: the fact that the fact that either the backroom is not a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both is not true hold if it is not a vandyke. sent6: that the backroom is not a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both is not wrong if it is not a kind of a vandyke. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a lout then that it is a kind of a summation or it is not continual or both is not true. sent8: there exists something such that if it is a vandyke then that it either is not a rental or does not irradiate thallium or both is incorrect. sent9: if the backroom is not a vandyke then that it is not a rental or does irradiate thallium or both is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a vandyke then either it is not a kind of a rental or it does not irradiate thallium or both. sent11: that the backroom does irradiate Nummulitidae hold if it does not irradiate thallium. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__