there exists something such that if it is not a kapok that it is two-dimensional thing that is igneous is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that something is syncarpous and a touchdown is false if it is not a kilobit. sent2: if the myope is not a kind of a sediment it is colloidal and it is igneous. sent3: that the myope is two-dimensional and it is igneous is incorrect if it is not a kapok. sent4: the myope is two-dimensional thing that is igneous if it is not a kapok. sent5: the fact that that something is a kind of a palatine that outstares Australian is right does not hold if it is not mononuclear. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not glad that it is reactive and is a palatine is incorrect. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is a kapok then that it is two-dimensional and it is igneous does not hold is not false. sent8: the fact that the myope is igneous and it comes cousin is incorrect if it is violent. sent9: that the myope is two-dimensional and is igneous is false if it is a kapok. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a kapok then it is two-dimensional and igneous. sent11: if something is not two-dimensional then that it is unpaintable and it does pulsate is incorrect. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a coachman is not false then the fact that the fact that it is evil and it is a kind of a weed hold is not true is not false. sent13: there is something such that if it is not aldehydic then the fact that it is both a concerto and a comparative is incorrect. sent14: if the myope is not a shrimp then that it is both igneous and definite is incorrect.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not mononuclear then the fact that it is a kind of a palatine and it outstares Australian is not correct.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the chump is a kind of palatine thing that does outstare Australian is false if it is not mononuclear.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kapok that it is two-dimensional thing that is igneous is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is syncarpous and a touchdown is false if it is not a kilobit. sent2: if the myope is not a kind of a sediment it is colloidal and it is igneous. sent3: that the myope is two-dimensional and it is igneous is incorrect if it is not a kapok. sent4: the myope is two-dimensional thing that is igneous if it is not a kapok. sent5: the fact that that something is a kind of a palatine that outstares Australian is right does not hold if it is not mononuclear. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not glad that it is reactive and is a palatine is incorrect. sent7: that there exists something such that if it is a kapok then that it is two-dimensional and it is igneous does not hold is not false. sent8: the fact that the myope is igneous and it comes cousin is incorrect if it is violent. sent9: that the myope is two-dimensional and is igneous is false if it is a kapok. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a kapok then it is two-dimensional and igneous. sent11: if something is not two-dimensional then that it is unpaintable and it does pulsate is incorrect. sent12: the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is not a coachman is not false then the fact that the fact that it is evil and it is a kind of a weed hold is not true is not false. sent13: there is something such that if it is not aldehydic then the fact that it is both a concerto and a comparative is incorrect. sent14: if the myope is not a shrimp then that it is both igneous and definite is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__