the breakable happens if the homileticsness occurs.
sent1: if the fact that both the non-epidemicness and the silencing occurs is not correct then the fact that the deanship does not occur is true. sent2: the non-peripheralness is prevented by that the acousticsness occurs. sent3: if the reddening shaping does not occur that both the non-pancreaticness and the discordance happens does not hold. sent4: if the deanship does not occur then the breakable happens. sent5: the monsoon occurs. sent6: the tort occurs. sent7: the isometrics happens. sent8: the Laputanness happens if the circumcision occurs. sent9: the fact that the epidemic occurs and the silencing happens is not correct. sent10: the presentment does not occur if the stabilizing occurs and the homileticsness occurs. sent11: that the epidemic happens and the silencing happens does not hold if the stabilizing does not occur. sent12: that the reddening barberry does not occur is correct. sent13: the angling flammability does not occur. sent14: the presentment happens. sent15: the reddening shaping occurs if the avianness happens. sent16: the fact that the quantitativeness does not occur but the internship occurs is not correct. sent17: if the getting indemnity does not occur then that the seceding does not occur but the choreographicness happens is wrong. sent18: if the epidemicness occurs then the deanship does not occur. sent19: the fact that the epidemicness does not occur and the silence occurs is not right if the stabilizing does not occur. sent20: if the implicationalness happens the slur happens. sent21: the devaluing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stabilizing occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the homileticsness happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the stabilizing occurs and the homileticsness occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the presentment does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stabilizing does not occur.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: that the non-epidemicness and the silencing occurs is not right.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the deanship does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the breakableness happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the breakable happens if the homileticsness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that both the non-epidemicness and the silencing occurs is not correct then the fact that the deanship does not occur is true. sent2: the non-peripheralness is prevented by that the acousticsness occurs. sent3: if the reddening shaping does not occur that both the non-pancreaticness and the discordance happens does not hold. sent4: if the deanship does not occur then the breakable happens. sent5: the monsoon occurs. sent6: the tort occurs. sent7: the isometrics happens. sent8: the Laputanness happens if the circumcision occurs. sent9: the fact that the epidemic occurs and the silencing happens is not correct. sent10: the presentment does not occur if the stabilizing occurs and the homileticsness occurs. sent11: that the epidemic happens and the silencing happens does not hold if the stabilizing does not occur. sent12: that the reddening barberry does not occur is correct. sent13: the angling flammability does not occur. sent14: the presentment happens. sent15: the reddening shaping occurs if the avianness happens. sent16: the fact that the quantitativeness does not occur but the internship occurs is not correct. sent17: if the getting indemnity does not occur then that the seceding does not occur but the choreographicness happens is wrong. sent18: if the epidemicness occurs then the deanship does not occur. sent19: the fact that the epidemicness does not occur and the silence occurs is not right if the stabilizing does not occur. sent20: if the implicationalness happens the slur happens. sent21: the devaluing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stabilizing occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the homileticsness happens.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the stabilizing occurs and the homileticsness occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the presentment does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stabilizing does not occur.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: that the non-epidemicness and the silencing occurs is not right.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the deanship does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the breakableness happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__