that the dimity does not article fire and is a Purcell is wrong.
sent1: something is not ceric and it is not an indent if it is Cartesian. sent2: something is not ceric if it does not double. sent3: the arctiid is a complex. sent4: if something is a kind of a Australian that is a nominator it does not charm. sent5: the dimity is a kind of non-anaerobic thing that is a kind of a Purcell. sent6: that if the fact that something is double and it does parse Lilliputian is not true it is not ceric is not false. sent7: something is not non-Cartesian and it is a Don if it is not civic. sent8: if the arctiid is a nominator but it is not an oral the internode is a kind of a nominator. sent9: the internode is a Australian if that it does not article strait and is not a kind of a Australian is false. sent10: the dimity is non-fatty but it is bilious if it is not a Raphicerus. sent11: the start does not parse sousaphone and is a whetstone if it is not minimalist. sent12: that the town is not non-symbolic and it is a covetousness is not true if the internode is not a charm. sent13: the dimity is not a kind of a Scaramouch. sent14: that the internode does not article strait and it is not a Australian does not hold. sent15: the arctiid is a nominator but it is not an oral if it is a complex. sent16: if something is not a rape then it is not unquestionable. sent17: there is nothing such that it does double and it does parse Lilliputian. sent18: something is a kind of a Purcell if it is not ceric. sent19: if that something is intelligible and is a citrine is not true then it does not fix debridement. sent20: there exists nothing that is both a stag and a hemlock. sent21: something does not article fire but it is a kind of a Purcell if it is not ceric. sent22: the dimity is a Purcell. sent23: the phagocyte does not parse Lilliputian.
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the dimity is a double and does parse Lilliputian is not correct.; sent6 -> int2: if that the dimity is a kind of a double and does parse Lilliputian is not true then it is non-ceric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dimity is not ceric is correct.; sent21 -> int4: the dimity does not article fire and is a Purcell if it is not ceric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dimity does not article fire but it is a Purcell does not hold.
sent1 -> int5: the fact that the guarani is both not ceric and not an indent is not false if it is Cartesian.; sent7 -> int6: if the guarani is not civic then it is not non-Cartesian and it is a Don.; sent4 -> int7: if the internode is a Australian and it is a nominator then it is not a charm.; sent9 & sent14 -> int8: the internode is a Australian.; sent15 & sent3 -> int9: the arctiid is a kind of a nominator and is not an oral.; sent8 & int9 -> int10: that the internode is a nominator is not false.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the internode is Australian and a nominator.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the internode does not charm.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the town is symbolic and is a covetousness is false.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that that it is symbolic and it is a covetousness is false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the dimity does not article fire and is a Purcell is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not ceric and it is not an indent if it is Cartesian. sent2: something is not ceric if it does not double. sent3: the arctiid is a complex. sent4: if something is a kind of a Australian that is a nominator it does not charm. sent5: the dimity is a kind of non-anaerobic thing that is a kind of a Purcell. sent6: that if the fact that something is double and it does parse Lilliputian is not true it is not ceric is not false. sent7: something is not non-Cartesian and it is a Don if it is not civic. sent8: if the arctiid is a nominator but it is not an oral the internode is a kind of a nominator. sent9: the internode is a Australian if that it does not article strait and is not a kind of a Australian is false. sent10: the dimity is non-fatty but it is bilious if it is not a Raphicerus. sent11: the start does not parse sousaphone and is a whetstone if it is not minimalist. sent12: that the town is not non-symbolic and it is a covetousness is not true if the internode is not a charm. sent13: the dimity is not a kind of a Scaramouch. sent14: that the internode does not article strait and it is not a Australian does not hold. sent15: the arctiid is a nominator but it is not an oral if it is a complex. sent16: if something is not a rape then it is not unquestionable. sent17: there is nothing such that it does double and it does parse Lilliputian. sent18: something is a kind of a Purcell if it is not ceric. sent19: if that something is intelligible and is a citrine is not true then it does not fix debridement. sent20: there exists nothing that is both a stag and a hemlock. sent21: something does not article fire but it is a kind of a Purcell if it is not ceric. sent22: the dimity is a Purcell. sent23: the phagocyte does not parse Lilliputian. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the fact that the dimity is a double and does parse Lilliputian is not correct.; sent6 -> int2: if that the dimity is a kind of a double and does parse Lilliputian is not true then it is non-ceric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the dimity is not ceric is correct.; sent21 -> int4: the dimity does not article fire and is a Purcell if it is not ceric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__