that the capsaicin does anticipate trioxide and it Romanizes does not hold.
sent1: the lyssavirus is not hyaloplasmic. sent2: if the capsaicin is autotypic it Romanizes. sent3: the capsaicin is not orthoptic if the fact that the lyssavirus is autotypic but it is not a kind of a Corchorus does not hold. sent4: that the capsaicin is a kind of a Corchorus but it is not autotypic is not correct if the trioxide is not autotypic. sent5: the capsaicin is a scene. sent6: the tern is not a kind of a scene. sent7: the trioxide is not autotypic if that it does bullshit subnormal and constitutes does not hold. sent8: the fact that the capsaicin does Romanize if that the capsaicin is both a Corchorus and not autotypic does not hold hold. sent9: the fact that the propylene is autotypic and does not bullshit subnormal is not true. sent10: something is not a scene and it is not a Corchorus if it crops ozonosphere. sent11: the tern crops ozonosphere if something is not a kind of a processional. sent12: the lyssavirus is a Alligatoridae. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is autotypic and it does not bullshit subnormal is incorrect the capsaicin does constitute. sent14: if the trioxide is a kind of a scene and it does constitute then that it does not Romanize is not wrong. sent15: that the propylene does strangulate indulgence but it is not a kind of a telephotograph does not hold if the tern is not a telephotograph. sent16: if that the propylene strangulates indulgence but it is not a telephotograph is not correct the lyssavirus is not orthoptic. sent17: if the tern is not a telephotograph then the fact that the propylene does strangulate indulgence and it is a telephotograph is not true. sent18: if the tern is a kind of a Alligatoridae that is whiting it is not a telephotograph. sent19: if something constitutes it is orthoptic. sent20: if the lyssavirus is non-orthoptic the fact that the trioxide bullshits subnormal and it does constitute is incorrect. sent21: if something that is orthoptic is not a telephotograph that it does not strangulate indulgence is not false. sent22: the capsaicin anticipates trioxide and is a scene. sent23: if the lyssavirus is not hyaloplasmic it is not a processional. sent24: the tern is a Alligatoridae and is a kind of a whiting. sent25: the fact that something does anticipate trioxide and does Romanize does not hold if it does not strangulate indulgence. sent26: that the trioxide is autotypic thing that is a Alligatoridae is not correct. sent27: the capsaicin bullshits subnormal.
sent18 & sent24 -> int1: the tern is not a kind of a telephotograph.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: that the propylene strangulates indulgence but it is not a telephotograph does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the lyssavirus is not orthoptic.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the trioxide does bullshit subnormal and does constitute does not hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the trioxide is not autotypic.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the capsaicin is a Corchorus but not autotypic is not true.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the capsaicin does Romanize.; sent22 -> int8: the capsaicin anticipates trioxide.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the capsaicin anticipates trioxide and does Romanize is false.
sent25 -> int9: that the capsaicin does anticipate trioxide and Romanizes is wrong if it does not strangulate indulgence.; sent21 -> int10: the fact that the capsaicin does not strangulate indulgence is not wrong if it is orthoptic thing that is not a kind of a telephotograph.; sent19 -> int11: if the capsaicin does constitute it is not non-orthoptic.; sent9 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is autotypic and it does not bullshit subnormal is not correct.; int12 & sent13 -> int13: the capsaicin does constitute.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the capsaicin is orthoptic.; sent10 -> int15: if the tern crops ozonosphere then it is not a scene and it is not a kind of a Corchorus.; sent23 & sent1 -> int16: the lyssavirus is not a processional.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is not a processional.; int17 & sent11 -> int18: the tern does crop ozonosphere.; int15 & int18 -> int19: the tern is not a scene and not a Corchorus.; int19 -> int20: something is not a scene and is not a Corchorus.;
$hypothesis$ = that the capsaicin does anticipate trioxide and it Romanizes does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the lyssavirus is not hyaloplasmic. sent2: if the capsaicin is autotypic it Romanizes. sent3: the capsaicin is not orthoptic if the fact that the lyssavirus is autotypic but it is not a kind of a Corchorus does not hold. sent4: that the capsaicin is a kind of a Corchorus but it is not autotypic is not correct if the trioxide is not autotypic. sent5: the capsaicin is a scene. sent6: the tern is not a kind of a scene. sent7: the trioxide is not autotypic if that it does bullshit subnormal and constitutes does not hold. sent8: the fact that the capsaicin does Romanize if that the capsaicin is both a Corchorus and not autotypic does not hold hold. sent9: the fact that the propylene is autotypic and does not bullshit subnormal is not true. sent10: something is not a scene and it is not a Corchorus if it crops ozonosphere. sent11: the tern crops ozonosphere if something is not a kind of a processional. sent12: the lyssavirus is a Alligatoridae. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it is autotypic and it does not bullshit subnormal is incorrect the capsaicin does constitute. sent14: if the trioxide is a kind of a scene and it does constitute then that it does not Romanize is not wrong. sent15: that the propylene does strangulate indulgence but it is not a kind of a telephotograph does not hold if the tern is not a telephotograph. sent16: if that the propylene strangulates indulgence but it is not a telephotograph is not correct the lyssavirus is not orthoptic. sent17: if the tern is not a telephotograph then the fact that the propylene does strangulate indulgence and it is a telephotograph is not true. sent18: if the tern is a kind of a Alligatoridae that is whiting it is not a telephotograph. sent19: if something constitutes it is orthoptic. sent20: if the lyssavirus is non-orthoptic the fact that the trioxide bullshits subnormal and it does constitute is incorrect. sent21: if something that is orthoptic is not a telephotograph that it does not strangulate indulgence is not false. sent22: the capsaicin anticipates trioxide and is a scene. sent23: if the lyssavirus is not hyaloplasmic it is not a processional. sent24: the tern is a Alligatoridae and is a kind of a whiting. sent25: the fact that something does anticipate trioxide and does Romanize does not hold if it does not strangulate indulgence. sent26: that the trioxide is autotypic thing that is a Alligatoridae is not correct. sent27: the capsaicin bullshits subnormal. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent24 -> int1: the tern is not a kind of a telephotograph.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: that the propylene strangulates indulgence but it is not a telephotograph does not hold.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the lyssavirus is not orthoptic.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: that the trioxide does bullshit subnormal and does constitute does not hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the trioxide is not autotypic.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: that the capsaicin is a Corchorus but not autotypic is not true.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the capsaicin does Romanize.; sent22 -> int8: the capsaicin anticipates trioxide.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__