there is something such that if the fact that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a Geochelone is incorrect it is non-Moroccan.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not unfold and is a twentieth is wrong then it does not bone bloater. sent2: the sowbelly is a Geochelone if the fact that it does not firebomb twit and is blastomycotic is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is not pluralistic but it is a liquefaction is false the fact that it does not undervalue is right. sent4: there is something such that if it does firebomb cyberpunk that it is not a Moroccan is not false. sent5: there is something such that if that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a kind of a Geochelone is false then it is a Moroccan. sent6: there is something such that if it does not bone sowbelly and is a molluscum then it is not hard. sent7: if the sowbelly does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a kind of a Geochelone then that it is not a Moroccan is true. sent8: the sowbelly is a Moroccan if the fact that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and it is a kind of a Geochelone does not hold. sent9: if the sowbelly is not a years and bones sowbelly it is not a fez. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a somewhere then it is not a Indianan. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-year-round a scald then it is not a parasail. sent12: that the sowbelly is not a Moroccan is not wrong if the fact that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a Geochelone does not hold. sent13: that there is something such that if it does not walk bilberry then it is not cormous is correct. sent14: the sowbelly is not Moroccan if the fact that it is not a Geochelone is true.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is not pluralistic and is a kind of a liquefaction is incorrect then it does not undervalue.
sent3 -> int1: the sealant does not undervalue if the fact that it is not pluralistic and it is a liquefaction is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a Geochelone is incorrect it is non-Moroccan. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not unfold and is a twentieth is wrong then it does not bone bloater. sent2: the sowbelly is a Geochelone if the fact that it does not firebomb twit and is blastomycotic is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is not pluralistic but it is a liquefaction is false the fact that it does not undervalue is right. sent4: there is something such that if it does firebomb cyberpunk that it is not a Moroccan is not false. sent5: there is something such that if that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a kind of a Geochelone is false then it is a Moroccan. sent6: there is something such that if it does not bone sowbelly and is a molluscum then it is not hard. sent7: if the sowbelly does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a kind of a Geochelone then that it is not a Moroccan is true. sent8: the sowbelly is a Moroccan if the fact that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and it is a kind of a Geochelone does not hold. sent9: if the sowbelly is not a years and bones sowbelly it is not a fez. sent10: there is something such that if it is not a somewhere then it is not a Indianan. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-year-round a scald then it is not a parasail. sent12: that the sowbelly is not a Moroccan is not wrong if the fact that it does not firebomb cyberpunk and is a Geochelone does not hold. sent13: that there is something such that if it does not walk bilberry then it is not cormous is correct. sent14: the sowbelly is not Moroccan if the fact that it is not a Geochelone is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__