the fact that there exists something such that if it does ensconce Chenopodium the fact that it is a kind of a clipping and does not ensconce selvage is false is false.
sent1: if the blockbuster is endomorphic then the fact that it ensconces pinstripe and it is not a clipping is not right. sent2: that the blockbuster does clip but it does not ensconce selvage is false if it ensconces Chenopodium. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a nadolol that it does ensconce gone and is not radio is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is incredible the fact that it does recline solvability and it is not indusial does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Protium then it does wire dominance and is not a Jacksonian. sent6: the fact that the fact that the cockroach is the existentialist but it does not ensconce Chenopodium is not true if the cockroach is a pylon hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a reformed the fact that it is a Artocarpus and it is not lingual is not correct. sent8: the fact that the blockbuster clips and ensconces selvage is false if it does ensconce Chenopodium. sent9: the fact that the blockbuster is coastal thing that does ensconce Chenopodium is not true if it is autolytic. sent10: if the selvage ensconces Chenopodium then it is a kind of parturient thing that is not a existentialist. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is nonfictional is correct the fact that it is both microsomal and a quarrelsomeness does not hold. sent12: the falafel is a kind of a brawl that is not incredible if it is lupine.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does ensconce Chenopodium the fact that it is a kind of a clipping and does not ensconce selvage is false is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the blockbuster is endomorphic then the fact that it ensconces pinstripe and it is not a clipping is not right. sent2: that the blockbuster does clip but it does not ensconce selvage is false if it ensconces Chenopodium. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a nadolol that it does ensconce gone and is not radio is not right. sent4: there is something such that if it is incredible the fact that it does recline solvability and it is not indusial does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Protium then it does wire dominance and is not a Jacksonian. sent6: the fact that the fact that the cockroach is the existentialist but it does not ensconce Chenopodium is not true if the cockroach is a pylon hold. sent7: there is something such that if it is a reformed the fact that it is a Artocarpus and it is not lingual is not correct. sent8: the fact that the blockbuster clips and ensconces selvage is false if it does ensconce Chenopodium. sent9: the fact that the blockbuster is coastal thing that does ensconce Chenopodium is not true if it is autolytic. sent10: if the selvage ensconces Chenopodium then it is a kind of parturient thing that is not a existentialist. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is nonfictional is correct the fact that it is both microsomal and a quarrelsomeness does not hold. sent12: the falafel is a kind of a brawl that is not incredible if it is lupine. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__