that the padrone is a scooter and is a kind of a tribology is true.
sent1: the fact that something does not triangulate hold if the fact that it is both impatient and triangulate is not right. sent2: the padrone is a tribology if there is something such that the fact that it is not a tribology and it is a flies is incorrect. sent3: that the padrone is a kind of a scooter and it is ionic is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the padrone is not a Linux but it flies is not correct if the Mogul is not triangulate. sent5: the fact that that something is a scooter and is a tribology is correct does not hold if it is nonionic. sent6: if something is not ionic then the fact that it is a tribology and a scooter does not hold. sent7: that something is not hyaloplasmic but it is a Anaheim is incorrect if it is not a kind of a scooter. sent8: something is not ionic if the fact that it is not a Linux but a flies does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tribology and is a flies is wrong.
sent3 -> int1: the padrone is a scooter.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the padrone is a kind of a tribology.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the padrone is a kind of a scooter that is a kind of a tribology is incorrect.
sent5 -> int3: that the padrone is a scooter and it is a kind of a tribology does not hold if it is not ionic.; sent8 -> int4: if that the padrone is not a Linux but it is a flies does not hold then it is not ionic.; sent1 -> int5: the Mogul does not triangulate if the fact that it is not patient and it does triangulate does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the padrone is a scooter and is a kind of a tribology is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not triangulate hold if the fact that it is both impatient and triangulate is not right. sent2: the padrone is a tribology if there is something such that the fact that it is not a tribology and it is a flies is incorrect. sent3: that the padrone is a kind of a scooter and it is ionic is not wrong. sent4: the fact that the padrone is not a Linux but it flies is not correct if the Mogul is not triangulate. sent5: the fact that that something is a scooter and is a tribology is correct does not hold if it is nonionic. sent6: if something is not ionic then the fact that it is a tribology and a scooter does not hold. sent7: that something is not hyaloplasmic but it is a Anaheim is incorrect if it is not a kind of a scooter. sent8: something is not ionic if the fact that it is not a Linux but a flies does not hold. sent9: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tribology and is a flies is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the padrone is a scooter.; sent9 & sent2 -> int2: the padrone is a kind of a tribology.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__