the rearward surmises and it is a removed.
sent1: the steamboat is a Limnodromus. sent2: the twinkler is a Gallicanism. sent3: the contestant is a glasswort if the fact that the thyroid crusts erg hold. sent4: something is a titillation if it is not cryogenics. sent5: that the steamboat is not careful but it crusts erg is incorrect if the thyroid is priestly. sent6: the thyroid is a kind of a Greenwich if something crusts erg and is careful. sent7: if the thyroid is not careful then it does crust erg. sent8: if something is unpriestly then that it is a glasswort and it does not crust erg is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it does skittle then the resident is mucinoid. sent10: something crusts erg if the fact that it is not mucinoid and it is careful is not correct. sent11: everything is not a kind of a blaster. sent12: the rearward does surmise if something that is conspicuous is priestly. sent13: if something is not a Gallicanism that it does surmise and is a kind of a removed is not correct. sent14: if a removed is careful then the fact that the thyroid surmises is right. sent15: the rearward is a Greenwich. sent16: something that is a kind of a Greenwich is not priestly. sent17: something that is a Greenwich is a kind of a removed. sent18: the steamboat is conspicuous and it is priestly if there is something such that it is a kind of a glasswort. sent19: something crusts priggishness and it is a bumboat. sent20: the fact that the steamboat is a kind of a idesia is correct. sent21: something is conspicuous or it is a kind of a Greenwich or both if it is not a blaster.
sent10 -> int1: the thyroid does crust erg if the fact that it is a kind of non-mucinoid thing that is careful does not hold.; sent17 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the rearward is the removed is right if the rearward is a Greenwich hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the rearward removes.;
that the rearward surmises and is a removed is not true.
sent13 -> int4: if the rearward is not a kind of a Gallicanism then the fact that it does surmise and it is a removed is false.; sent8 -> int5: that the twinkler is a kind of a glasswort that does not crust erg is not correct if it is not priestly.; sent21 -> int6: the thyroid is conspicuous or it is a kind of a Greenwich or both if it is not a blaster.; sent11 -> int7: that the thyroid is not a kind of a blaster is correct.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the thyroid is conspicuous or is a Greenwich or both.; int8 -> int9: everything is conspicuous and/or is a kind of a Greenwich.; int9 -> int10: either the twinkler is conspicuous or it is a Greenwich or both.; sent16 -> int11: if that the twinkler is a Greenwich is correct it is not priestly.;
$hypothesis$ = the rearward surmises and it is a removed. ; $context$ = sent1: the steamboat is a Limnodromus. sent2: the twinkler is a Gallicanism. sent3: the contestant is a glasswort if the fact that the thyroid crusts erg hold. sent4: something is a titillation if it is not cryogenics. sent5: that the steamboat is not careful but it crusts erg is incorrect if the thyroid is priestly. sent6: the thyroid is a kind of a Greenwich if something crusts erg and is careful. sent7: if the thyroid is not careful then it does crust erg. sent8: if something is unpriestly then that it is a glasswort and it does not crust erg is not right. sent9: if there is something such that it does skittle then the resident is mucinoid. sent10: something crusts erg if the fact that it is not mucinoid and it is careful is not correct. sent11: everything is not a kind of a blaster. sent12: the rearward does surmise if something that is conspicuous is priestly. sent13: if something is not a Gallicanism that it does surmise and is a kind of a removed is not correct. sent14: if a removed is careful then the fact that the thyroid surmises is right. sent15: the rearward is a Greenwich. sent16: something that is a kind of a Greenwich is not priestly. sent17: something that is a Greenwich is a kind of a removed. sent18: the steamboat is conspicuous and it is priestly if there is something such that it is a kind of a glasswort. sent19: something crusts priggishness and it is a bumboat. sent20: the fact that the steamboat is a kind of a idesia is correct. sent21: something is conspicuous or it is a kind of a Greenwich or both if it is not a blaster. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the thyroid does crust erg if the fact that it is a kind of non-mucinoid thing that is careful does not hold.; sent17 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the rearward is the removed is right if the rearward is a Greenwich hold.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the rearward removes.; __UNKNOWN__