the fact that the xanthomonad does recharge and does not brief ostrich is false.
sent1: the annuitant does incorporate Innsbruck if the flowage does not breeze but it is a self-stimulation. sent2: there is something such that it acclimatizes. sent3: the flowage does not breeze but it is a kind of a self-stimulation if there is something such that it acclimatizes. sent4: if the fact that the catacomb is Gilbertian thing that is acquisitive is wrong the xanthomonad does not brief ostrich. sent5: the xanthomonad is not thenal. sent6: the catacomb does breeze and it is Gilbertian. sent7: if the fact that the neckband is not Gilbertian hold that the catacomb is Gilbertian thing that is acquisitive does not hold. sent8: if the annuitant does incorporate Innsbruck and does bus then the neckband is not Gilbertian. sent9: the annuitant is a kind of a bus and it is bionic. sent10: the xanthomonad is agential and it is acquisitive. sent11: the xanthomonad is agential and it recharges if it is not thenal. sent12: the fact that the xanthomonad is thenal thing that is a bus does not hold.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the flowage is both not a breeze and a self-stimulation.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the annuitant incorporates Innsbruck.; sent9 -> int3: the fact that the annuitant is a kind of a bus is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the annuitant incorporates Innsbruck and it buses.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the neckband is non-Gilbertian.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the catacomb is Gilbertian and it is acquisitive does not hold.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the xanthomonad does not brief ostrich.; sent11 & sent5 -> int8: the xanthomonad is agential and it does recharge.; int8 -> int9: the xanthomonad recharges.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the xanthomonad does recharge and does not brief ostrich is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the annuitant does incorporate Innsbruck if the flowage does not breeze but it is a self-stimulation. sent2: there is something such that it acclimatizes. sent3: the flowage does not breeze but it is a kind of a self-stimulation if there is something such that it acclimatizes. sent4: if the fact that the catacomb is Gilbertian thing that is acquisitive is wrong the xanthomonad does not brief ostrich. sent5: the xanthomonad is not thenal. sent6: the catacomb does breeze and it is Gilbertian. sent7: if the fact that the neckband is not Gilbertian hold that the catacomb is Gilbertian thing that is acquisitive does not hold. sent8: if the annuitant does incorporate Innsbruck and does bus then the neckband is not Gilbertian. sent9: the annuitant is a kind of a bus and it is bionic. sent10: the xanthomonad is agential and it is acquisitive. sent11: the xanthomonad is agential and it recharges if it is not thenal. sent12: the fact that the xanthomonad is thenal thing that is a bus does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the flowage is both not a breeze and a self-stimulation.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the annuitant incorporates Innsbruck.; sent9 -> int3: the fact that the annuitant is a kind of a bus is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the annuitant incorporates Innsbruck and it buses.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the neckband is non-Gilbertian.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the catacomb is Gilbertian and it is acquisitive does not hold.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the xanthomonad does not brief ostrich.; sent11 & sent5 -> int8: the xanthomonad is agential and it does recharge.; int8 -> int9: the xanthomonad recharges.; int7 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__