the arabesque is not a wind.
sent1: that something is not an overnighter and it is not Platonic is false if it is unitary. sent2: if the bracken does minstrel stateliness and it is a valency the fact that the deadwood is not inclement is not wrong. sent3: The fact that the lyricality stickles naprapath is not wrong. sent4: if the fact that the bracken minstrels stateliness but it is not a valency is not correct then the arabesque is a kind of a wind. sent5: if the naprapath minstrels stateliness the bracken is inclement. sent6: if the deadwood does not wind then the arabesque is a wind and is not inclement. sent7: the fact that the naprapath stickles lyricality is not wrong. sent8: the naprapath is inclement but it is not an overnighter if the deadwood is not inclement. sent9: the arabesque is not a wind if the bracken stickles lyricality and is inclement. sent10: something does not stickle lyricality if it is inclement and is not an overnighter. sent11: the deadwood is not inclement if the bracken minstrels stateliness but it is not a valency.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bracken does minstrel stateliness but it is not a valency.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the deadwood is not inclement.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the naprapath is both inclement and not an overnighter hold.; sent10 -> int3: if the naprapath is a kind of inclement thing that is not an overnighter then that it does not stickle lyricality is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the naprapath does not stickle lyricality.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the bracken does minstrel stateliness and is not a valency is not true.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the arabesque is not a wind.
sent1 -> int7: if the naprapath is unitary that it is not an overnighter and it is not Platonic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the arabesque is not a wind. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not an overnighter and it is not Platonic is false if it is unitary. sent2: if the bracken does minstrel stateliness and it is a valency the fact that the deadwood is not inclement is not wrong. sent3: The fact that the lyricality stickles naprapath is not wrong. sent4: if the fact that the bracken minstrels stateliness but it is not a valency is not correct then the arabesque is a kind of a wind. sent5: if the naprapath minstrels stateliness the bracken is inclement. sent6: if the deadwood does not wind then the arabesque is a wind and is not inclement. sent7: the fact that the naprapath stickles lyricality is not wrong. sent8: the naprapath is inclement but it is not an overnighter if the deadwood is not inclement. sent9: the arabesque is not a wind if the bracken stickles lyricality and is inclement. sent10: something does not stickle lyricality if it is inclement and is not an overnighter. sent11: the deadwood is not inclement if the bracken minstrels stateliness but it is not a valency. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bracken does minstrel stateliness but it is not a valency.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the deadwood is not inclement.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the naprapath is both inclement and not an overnighter hold.; sent10 -> int3: if the naprapath is a kind of inclement thing that is not an overnighter then that it does not stickle lyricality is right.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the naprapath does not stickle lyricality.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the bracken does minstrel stateliness and is not a valency is not true.; int6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__