that the dunning dowdiness occurs is not right.
sent1: the fact that both the prickling and the description occurs does not hold. sent2: if the feast happens then that the prickling does not occur and the description occurs is incorrect. sent3: the licensing occurs if the fact that not the prickling but the description happens does not hold. sent4: the feasting happens. sent5: the dunning flip-flop happens. sent6: the fact that the non-nonmodernness and the unpeacefulness happens is incorrect if the feast does not occur. sent7: if that the dunning flip-flop does not occur is not false then that the feasting does not occur and the licensing does not occur is not true. sent8: that the prickling happens results in the licensing. sent9: the fact that both the prickling and the description happens is incorrect if the fact that the feasting occurs is not wrong. sent10: the fact that not the convoy but the calisthenicsness occurs is not true. sent11: the dunning carter happens. sent12: the dunning dowdiness is prevented by that both the licensing and the dunning flip-flop happens. sent13: if the fact that the dunning dowdiness does not occur and the license occurs does not hold the dunning dowdiness happens. sent14: the fact that the Delphicness happens is right. sent15: the rendering EDS occurs. sent16: if the fact that the pleaching jellyfish does not occur is right then the dunning flip-flop does not occur and the reforestation does not occur. sent17: if the feasting does not occur then the fact that the dunning dowdiness does not occur but the license occurs is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the admissibleness happens is right the fact that the fact that the scam does not occur and the rendezvousing fruiting occurs is wrong is not false. sent19: the mayhem does not occur. sent20: the discovery occurs. sent21: the unchristianness is prevented by that the impoliteness happens and the pleaching Kakatoe occurs. sent22: the anterior occurs.
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the prickling does not occur but the description happens is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the licensing happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: both the licensing and the dunning flip-flop occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the modernness and the unpeacefulness occurs is not right.
$hypothesis$ = that the dunning dowdiness occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the prickling and the description occurs does not hold. sent2: if the feast happens then that the prickling does not occur and the description occurs is incorrect. sent3: the licensing occurs if the fact that not the prickling but the description happens does not hold. sent4: the feasting happens. sent5: the dunning flip-flop happens. sent6: the fact that the non-nonmodernness and the unpeacefulness happens is incorrect if the feast does not occur. sent7: if that the dunning flip-flop does not occur is not false then that the feasting does not occur and the licensing does not occur is not true. sent8: that the prickling happens results in the licensing. sent9: the fact that both the prickling and the description happens is incorrect if the fact that the feasting occurs is not wrong. sent10: the fact that not the convoy but the calisthenicsness occurs is not true. sent11: the dunning carter happens. sent12: the dunning dowdiness is prevented by that both the licensing and the dunning flip-flop happens. sent13: if the fact that the dunning dowdiness does not occur and the license occurs does not hold the dunning dowdiness happens. sent14: the fact that the Delphicness happens is right. sent15: the rendering EDS occurs. sent16: if the fact that the pleaching jellyfish does not occur is right then the dunning flip-flop does not occur and the reforestation does not occur. sent17: if the feasting does not occur then the fact that the dunning dowdiness does not occur but the license occurs is not correct. sent18: if the fact that the admissibleness happens is right the fact that the fact that the scam does not occur and the rendezvousing fruiting occurs is wrong is not false. sent19: the mayhem does not occur. sent20: the discovery occurs. sent21: the unchristianness is prevented by that the impoliteness happens and the pleaching Kakatoe occurs. sent22: the anterior occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent4 -> int1: that the prickling does not occur but the description happens is wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the licensing happens.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: both the licensing and the dunning flip-flop occurs.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__