the fact that the glaring does not occur and the incarnation occurs is false.
sent1: the fact that not the nonthermalness but the risking occurs is not true. sent2: the inducing Novosibirsk does not occur. sent3: that the glare does not occur and the incarnation occurs is not true if the grating puritan does not occur. sent4: the detraining happens. sent5: the ways does not occur. sent6: the novation and the effleurage happens. sent7: the fact that the souther but not the finger-roll occurs does not hold. sent8: that the grating puritan happens hold. sent9: the unprotectiveness happens. sent10: the stunner does not occur. sent11: the fact that the combustible does not occur is true. sent12: that both the grating puritan and the glaring occurs leads to that the detraining does not occur. sent13: if the illusion happens then that the nonthermalness does not occur and the risk does not occur does not hold. sent14: if the novation occurs then the illusion happens. sent15: if that the nonthermalness does not occur and the risking does not occur is not right the incarnation happens. sent16: the effleurage occurs. sent17: the plication happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glare occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the grating puritan occurs and the glaring occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the detraining does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the glaring does not occur.; sent6 -> int5: the novation occurs.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the illusion happens.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: that the nonthermalness does not occur and the risking does not occur does not hold.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the incarnation occurs.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the glaring does not occur but the incarnation occurs is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the glaring does not occur and the incarnation occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the nonthermalness but the risking occurs is not true. sent2: the inducing Novosibirsk does not occur. sent3: that the glare does not occur and the incarnation occurs is not true if the grating puritan does not occur. sent4: the detraining happens. sent5: the ways does not occur. sent6: the novation and the effleurage happens. sent7: the fact that the souther but not the finger-roll occurs does not hold. sent8: that the grating puritan happens hold. sent9: the unprotectiveness happens. sent10: the stunner does not occur. sent11: the fact that the combustible does not occur is true. sent12: that both the grating puritan and the glaring occurs leads to that the detraining does not occur. sent13: if the illusion happens then that the nonthermalness does not occur and the risk does not occur does not hold. sent14: if the novation occurs then the illusion happens. sent15: if that the nonthermalness does not occur and the risking does not occur is not right the incarnation happens. sent16: the effleurage occurs. sent17: the plication happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glare occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the grating puritan occurs and the glaring occurs.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the detraining does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the glaring does not occur.; sent6 -> int5: the novation occurs.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the illusion happens.; sent13 & int6 -> int7: that the nonthermalness does not occur and the risking does not occur does not hold.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the incarnation occurs.; int4 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__