the topping financier is brought about by that the spectacular occurs.
sent1: if that the reshuffle does not occur and the improbableness does not occur is wrong then that the topping financier does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the topping financier occurs if the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur. sent3: that the Biedermeierness does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that either the prescriptiveness happens or the pulling does not occur or both is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the logging occurs is right the fact that the reshuffle does not occur and the improbableness does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the fact that not the raiding but the spectacular happens is wrong. sent6: the prescriptiveness does not occur. sent7: if that the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur is wrong then the topping financier occurs. sent8: the raid happens. sent9: if that the Faustianness does not occur is not incorrect both the superscription and the logging happens. sent10: the comfortableness does not occur and the reform does not occur. sent11: that the germiness happens and/or the ammoniacness prevents that the Faustianness occurs. sent12: that the raiding but not the spectacular happens is incorrect. sent13: both the ammoniac and the senatorship occurs if that the Biedermeierness does not occur hold. sent14: that the prescriptiveness happens and/or the pull does not occur is wrong if the topping tebibit occurs. sent15: if that the fact that the spectacular occurs and the raid happens hold does not hold the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur is correct.; assump2 -> int1: the spectacular does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectacular occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that that the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur hold does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the topping financier occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the topping financier is brought about by that the spectacular occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the reshuffle does not occur and the improbableness does not occur is wrong then that the topping financier does not occur is not incorrect. sent2: the topping financier occurs if the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur. sent3: that the Biedermeierness does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that either the prescriptiveness happens or the pulling does not occur or both is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the logging occurs is right the fact that the reshuffle does not occur and the improbableness does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the fact that not the raiding but the spectacular happens is wrong. sent6: the prescriptiveness does not occur. sent7: if that the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur is wrong then the topping financier occurs. sent8: the raid happens. sent9: if that the Faustianness does not occur is not incorrect both the superscription and the logging happens. sent10: the comfortableness does not occur and the reform does not occur. sent11: that the germiness happens and/or the ammoniacness prevents that the Faustianness occurs. sent12: that the raiding but not the spectacular happens is incorrect. sent13: both the ammoniac and the senatorship occurs if that the Biedermeierness does not occur hold. sent14: that the prescriptiveness happens and/or the pull does not occur is wrong if the topping tebibit occurs. sent15: if that the fact that the spectacular occurs and the raid happens hold does not hold the rat-a-tat-tat does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur is correct.; assump2 -> int1: the spectacular does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spectacular occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that that the raiding does not occur and the spectacular does not occur hold does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the topping financier occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__