the executioner does quarantine mineralogy.
sent1: the fact that the seersucker does not quarantine mineralogy but it is a sorority is false. sent2: if the seersucker is a Jat it does gibber. sent3: if that something is not a silt and it is not hadal does not hold then it is hadal. sent4: the seersucker is not a kind of a Jat. sent5: if the slough is a swash then it is a velar. sent6: that something is not a silt and it is not hadal is not right if it is not a hostel. sent7: the slough is autosomal. sent8: the executioner does quarantine mineralogy if the slough is a velar. sent9: the seersucker is a swash if the slough does gibber. sent10: that something is not a kind of a swash or gibbers or both is false if it is velar. sent11: something does gibber if the fact that it is not a Jat but a sorority is not correct. sent12: if something is a Jat it gibbers. sent13: the fact that the seersucker is a kind of a Jat that is a sorority is not correct. sent14: if that something is not a swash or it does gibber or both is false then it does not quarantine mineralogy. sent15: that the executioner is not a velar is not true if the slough is hadal. sent16: the seersucker is a shoe. sent17: everything does not gibber. sent18: the seersucker is a velar if the slough does gibber. sent19: if the seersucker is a sorority the slough does swash. sent20: everything is not a becket. sent21: the seersucker does not swash. sent22: the poison is a velar.
sent11 -> int1: if that the seersucker is both not a Jat and a sorority is incorrect then it does gibber.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the seersucker is both not a Jat and a sorority is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the seersucker gibbers.; sent17 -> int3: the seersucker does not gibber.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the seersucker is not a Jat but it is a sorority.; int5 -> int6: the seersucker is a sorority.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the slough is a swash.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the slough is a velar.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the executioner does not quarantine mineralogy.
sent14 -> int9: the executioner does not quarantine mineralogy if the fact that it either is not a swash or does gibber or both is not right.; sent10 -> int10: that the executioner is not a swash or it gibbers or both does not hold if it is a velar.; sent3 -> int11: the fact that the slough is hadal is not false if that it is not a silt and it is not hadal does not hold.; sent6 -> int12: that the slough is not a silt and it is not hadal is not true if it is not a hostel.;
$hypothesis$ = the executioner does quarantine mineralogy. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the seersucker does not quarantine mineralogy but it is a sorority is false. sent2: if the seersucker is a Jat it does gibber. sent3: if that something is not a silt and it is not hadal does not hold then it is hadal. sent4: the seersucker is not a kind of a Jat. sent5: if the slough is a swash then it is a velar. sent6: that something is not a silt and it is not hadal is not right if it is not a hostel. sent7: the slough is autosomal. sent8: the executioner does quarantine mineralogy if the slough is a velar. sent9: the seersucker is a swash if the slough does gibber. sent10: that something is not a kind of a swash or gibbers or both is false if it is velar. sent11: something does gibber if the fact that it is not a Jat but a sorority is not correct. sent12: if something is a Jat it gibbers. sent13: the fact that the seersucker is a kind of a Jat that is a sorority is not correct. sent14: if that something is not a swash or it does gibber or both is false then it does not quarantine mineralogy. sent15: that the executioner is not a velar is not true if the slough is hadal. sent16: the seersucker is a shoe. sent17: everything does not gibber. sent18: the seersucker is a velar if the slough does gibber. sent19: if the seersucker is a sorority the slough does swash. sent20: everything is not a becket. sent21: the seersucker does not swash. sent22: the poison is a velar. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if that the seersucker is both not a Jat and a sorority is incorrect then it does gibber.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the seersucker is both not a Jat and a sorority is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the seersucker gibbers.; sent17 -> int3: the seersucker does not gibber.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the seersucker is not a Jat but it is a sorority.; int5 -> int6: the seersucker is a sorority.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the slough is a swash.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the slough is a velar.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__