that the nuncio does flesh Abila and stuffs saltshaker is false.
sent1: there is nothing such that it is not excrescent and it does not mythologize knocker. sent2: if something is not a cannery then it does flesh Abila and stuffs saltshaker. sent3: if something is a vomiter it is not a detailed and is not a kind of a cannery. sent4: the fact that the slick is a boucle that does humanize is false. sent5: if something does not mythologize choking it is a geophyte and it is a vomiter. sent6: if something does chock buttock it does mythologize smothered and it does not mythologize pachuco. sent7: if the hafnium is a kind of non-colloidal thing that mythologizes choking the fact that the licentiate does not mythologizes choking is not incorrect. sent8: the fact that the slick is obligated and fleshes Abila does not hold. sent9: if something does not welcome then it is not non-implicit. sent10: the fact that the nuncio is high-tension but it is not wary does not hold if the slick obligates. sent11: if the slick is excrescent that the nuncio is wary but it does not obligate does not hold. sent12: the pachuco is not high-tension but it obligates if the dunlin is not wary. sent13: something is not a cannery if the fact that it is high-tension and it is not wary does not hold. sent14: the hafnium does chock buttock and it is a lithophyte. sent15: if something that does not detail is not a cannery then the dunlin is not wary. sent16: the hymenium is a kind of a cannery. sent17: the fact that the nuncio does not stuff saltshaker and it is not excrescent is not right. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not high-tension and it obligates the outfitter does not flesh Abila. sent19: if that something is a kind of non-excrescent thing that does not mythologize knocker does not hold it is obligated. sent20: something that mythologizes smothered is not colloidal and mythologizes choking.
sent19 -> int1: the slick obligates if the fact that it is non-excrescent thing that does not mythologize knocker is incorrect.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the slick is not excrescent and does not mythologize knocker is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the slick obligates.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the nuncio is not non-high-tension and not wary is not true.; sent13 -> int5: the nuncio is not a cannery if the fact that it is both high-tension and not wary is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nuncio is not a kind of a cannery.; sent2 -> int7: the nuncio does flesh Abila and does stuff saltshaker if it is not a cannery.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
that the nuncio does flesh Abila and it stuffs saltshaker is incorrect.
sent3 -> int8: that if the licentiate is the vomiter the licentiate is not a detailed and not a cannery is not wrong.; sent5 -> int9: if the licentiate does not mythologize choking then it is a geophyte and a vomiter.; sent20 -> int10: the fact that if the hafnium does mythologize smothered the hafnium is not colloidal but it mythologizes choking is not false.; sent6 -> int11: if the hafnium does chock buttock it does mythologize smothered and it does not mythologize pachuco.; sent14 -> int12: the hafnium does chock buttock.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the hafnium does mythologize smothered but it does not mythologize pachuco.; int13 -> int14: the hafnium mythologizes smothered.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the hafnium is not colloidal but it does mythologize choking.; sent7 & int15 -> int16: the licentiate does not mythologize choking.; int9 & int16 -> int17: the licentiate is a geophyte and it is a vomiter.; int17 -> int18: the licentiate is a kind of a vomiter.; int8 & int18 -> int19: the licentiate is not a detailed and it is not a cannery.; int19 -> int20: something is not a detailed and it is not a kind of a cannery.; int20 & sent15 -> int21: the dunlin is not wary.; sent12 & int21 -> int22: the pachuco is not high-tension but it does obligate.; int22 -> int23: something is not high-tension but it obligates.; int23 & sent18 -> int24: the outfitter does not flesh Abila.; int24 -> int25: there is something such that that it does not flesh Abila is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the nuncio does flesh Abila and stuffs saltshaker is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it is not excrescent and it does not mythologize knocker. sent2: if something is not a cannery then it does flesh Abila and stuffs saltshaker. sent3: if something is a vomiter it is not a detailed and is not a kind of a cannery. sent4: the fact that the slick is a boucle that does humanize is false. sent5: if something does not mythologize choking it is a geophyte and it is a vomiter. sent6: if something does chock buttock it does mythologize smothered and it does not mythologize pachuco. sent7: if the hafnium is a kind of non-colloidal thing that mythologizes choking the fact that the licentiate does not mythologizes choking is not incorrect. sent8: the fact that the slick is obligated and fleshes Abila does not hold. sent9: if something does not welcome then it is not non-implicit. sent10: the fact that the nuncio is high-tension but it is not wary does not hold if the slick obligates. sent11: if the slick is excrescent that the nuncio is wary but it does not obligate does not hold. sent12: the pachuco is not high-tension but it obligates if the dunlin is not wary. sent13: something is not a cannery if the fact that it is high-tension and it is not wary does not hold. sent14: the hafnium does chock buttock and it is a lithophyte. sent15: if something that does not detail is not a cannery then the dunlin is not wary. sent16: the hymenium is a kind of a cannery. sent17: the fact that the nuncio does not stuff saltshaker and it is not excrescent is not right. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not high-tension and it obligates the outfitter does not flesh Abila. sent19: if that something is a kind of non-excrescent thing that does not mythologize knocker does not hold it is obligated. sent20: something that mythologizes smothered is not colloidal and mythologizes choking. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the slick obligates if the fact that it is non-excrescent thing that does not mythologize knocker is incorrect.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the slick is not excrescent and does not mythologize knocker is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the slick obligates.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the fact that the nuncio is not non-high-tension and not wary is not true.; sent13 -> int5: the nuncio is not a cannery if the fact that it is both high-tension and not wary is not right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nuncio is not a kind of a cannery.; sent2 -> int7: the nuncio does flesh Abila and does stuff saltshaker if it is not a cannery.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__