the fact that the fink does not clear is not correct.
sent1: the passerby does not queen. sent2: The bondage appropriates stole. sent3: if there exists something such that it appropriates bondage and it appropriates matchboard then the fact that the ampicillin is spectral is not wrong. sent4: the fink is not a clearing if that it is strategics and it is not a creeps is false. sent5: the fact that the fink is both strategics and a creeps is not correct if it does not transit. sent6: the ampicillin transits and/or it is a kind of a creeps. sent7: the fact that something is an ecologist that does not appropriate paleology does not hold if it does not appropriate matchboard. sent8: that the stole appropriates matchboard hold if the fact that either the passerby is a queen or it is not a statue or both does not hold. sent9: the stole appropriates bondage. sent10: the fact that the fink is strategics but it does not creep is wrong if it does not transit. sent11: there is nothing such that either it is a queen or it is not a kind of a statue or both. sent12: if the ampicillin is spectral then the fink does not transit.
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the passerby is a kind of a queen and/or it is not a statue does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the stole does appropriate matchboard.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the stole appropriates bondage and appropriates matchboard.; int3 -> int4: that something appropriates bondage and does appropriate matchboard is right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the ampicillin is not non-spectral.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fink does not transit.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the fink is not non-strategics but it does not creep is false.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the geyser is a kind of an ecologist but it does not appropriate paleology does not hold.
sent7 -> int8: if the geyser does not appropriate matchboard then the fact that that it is an ecologist and does not appropriate paleology hold does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fink does not clear is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the passerby does not queen. sent2: The bondage appropriates stole. sent3: if there exists something such that it appropriates bondage and it appropriates matchboard then the fact that the ampicillin is spectral is not wrong. sent4: the fink is not a clearing if that it is strategics and it is not a creeps is false. sent5: the fact that the fink is both strategics and a creeps is not correct if it does not transit. sent6: the ampicillin transits and/or it is a kind of a creeps. sent7: the fact that something is an ecologist that does not appropriate paleology does not hold if it does not appropriate matchboard. sent8: that the stole appropriates matchboard hold if the fact that either the passerby is a queen or it is not a statue or both does not hold. sent9: the stole appropriates bondage. sent10: the fact that the fink is strategics but it does not creep is wrong if it does not transit. sent11: there is nothing such that either it is a queen or it is not a kind of a statue or both. sent12: if the ampicillin is spectral then the fink does not transit. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the passerby is a kind of a queen and/or it is not a statue does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the stole does appropriate matchboard.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the stole appropriates bondage and appropriates matchboard.; int3 -> int4: that something appropriates bondage and does appropriate matchboard is right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the ampicillin is not non-spectral.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fink does not transit.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: that the fink is not non-strategics but it does not creep is false.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__