the fact that the cannikin is a parsnip and is a neoclassicist is right.
sent1: the cannikin is nonparticulate. sent2: the bung commutates ringtail and/or it is nonparticulate. sent3: that the cannikin is a kind of a parsnip and is neoclassicist is false if the comfrey is not a kind of a home. sent4: the cannikin is neoclassicist if the comfrey is a home. sent5: if something is a carrageenin then it is unmalicious. sent6: the barterer is a carrageenin and it shoots barterer if that it does not rival determinateness is correct. sent7: the barterer does not rival determinateness. sent8: the cannikin is a kind of a neoclassicist if the comfrey is eastern. sent9: the comfrey is not non-home and/or it is eastern. sent10: the cannikin is both a parsnip and nonparticulate.
sent9 & sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the cannikin is a neoclassicist.; sent10 -> int2: the cannikin is a parsnip.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cannikin is both a parsnip and neoclassicist is wrong.
sent5 -> int3: if the barterer is a carrageenin it is unmalicious.; sent6 & sent7 -> int4: the barterer is a carrageenin and it shoots barterer.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the barterer is a kind of a carrageenin hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the barterer is unmalicious.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is unmalicious.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cannikin is a parsnip and is a neoclassicist is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the cannikin is nonparticulate. sent2: the bung commutates ringtail and/or it is nonparticulate. sent3: that the cannikin is a kind of a parsnip and is neoclassicist is false if the comfrey is not a kind of a home. sent4: the cannikin is neoclassicist if the comfrey is a home. sent5: if something is a carrageenin then it is unmalicious. sent6: the barterer is a carrageenin and it shoots barterer if that it does not rival determinateness is correct. sent7: the barterer does not rival determinateness. sent8: the cannikin is a kind of a neoclassicist if the comfrey is eastern. sent9: the comfrey is not non-home and/or it is eastern. sent10: the cannikin is both a parsnip and nonparticulate. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the cannikin is a neoclassicist.; sent10 -> int2: the cannikin is a parsnip.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__