the crossopterygian is not photic.
sent1: the crossopterygian is photic if the host is photic but it is not a nest. sent2: that the abscission does not nest and is not irrevocable is wrong. sent3: the fact that the softener is both a seeking and an outbreak is incorrect. sent4: if something is not a Utah or is not a nest or both it is not a kind of a Utah. sent5: the abscission does not marble amputee and/or is important. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a seeking and it is not photic is incorrect the host is not photic. sent7: the fact that the host is not sociolinguistics but it numbers tetanus is false if it is not a rabato. sent8: if the fact that the host is not sociolinguistics and it does not number tetanus is incorrect then the fact that the abscission is a nest hold. sent9: the host is a nest if it is sociolinguistics. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a nest either the menagerie is not a kind of a Utah or it does not nest or both. sent11: if the host seeks it is an outbreak. sent12: the fact that the softener is a seeking that is not photic is incorrect. sent13: something is not a nest if it does not marble amputee. sent14: something is not Rabelaisian if it slinks filature. sent15: if something does not marble amputee or is not unimportant or both then it is not a nest. sent16: if the host is not a rabato the fact that it is not photic and is not a seeking is not true. sent17: the crossopterygian is not photic if the host is a Utah and it is an outbreak. sent18: that the host is non-sociolinguistics thing that numbers tetanus does not hold. sent19: the fact that the host is a Utah is correct. sent20: something that is sociolinguistics does not number tetanus. sent21: the crossopterygian is not a seeking if there is something such that that it is a seeking and it is an outbreak is not correct. sent22: if the host is a kind of a rabato it does seek. sent23: the abscission is not a rabato or it is not a nest or both if there is something such that it is not a seeking. sent24: the fact that that the host is not sociolinguistics and it does not number tetanus is not correct if the host is not a kind of a rabato hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the host is not a rabato.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the host is non-sociolinguistics thing that does not number tetanus is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the abscission is a nest.; sent15 -> int3: if either the abscission does not marble amputee or it is important or both it is not a nest.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the abscission is not a nest.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the host is a rabato.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the host does seek.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the fact that the host is a kind of an outbreak is right.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the host is a kind of a Utah and it is an outbreak.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the crossopterygian is photic.
sent12 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a seeking and it is not photic is not correct.; int10 & sent6 -> int11: the host is photic.;
$hypothesis$ = the crossopterygian is not photic. ; $context$ = sent1: the crossopterygian is photic if the host is photic but it is not a nest. sent2: that the abscission does not nest and is not irrevocable is wrong. sent3: the fact that the softener is both a seeking and an outbreak is incorrect. sent4: if something is not a Utah or is not a nest or both it is not a kind of a Utah. sent5: the abscission does not marble amputee and/or is important. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is a seeking and it is not photic is incorrect the host is not photic. sent7: the fact that the host is not sociolinguistics but it numbers tetanus is false if it is not a rabato. sent8: if the fact that the host is not sociolinguistics and it does not number tetanus is incorrect then the fact that the abscission is a nest hold. sent9: the host is a nest if it is sociolinguistics. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a nest either the menagerie is not a kind of a Utah or it does not nest or both. sent11: if the host seeks it is an outbreak. sent12: the fact that the softener is a seeking that is not photic is incorrect. sent13: something is not a nest if it does not marble amputee. sent14: something is not Rabelaisian if it slinks filature. sent15: if something does not marble amputee or is not unimportant or both then it is not a nest. sent16: if the host is not a rabato the fact that it is not photic and is not a seeking is not true. sent17: the crossopterygian is not photic if the host is a Utah and it is an outbreak. sent18: that the host is non-sociolinguistics thing that numbers tetanus does not hold. sent19: the fact that the host is a Utah is correct. sent20: something that is sociolinguistics does not number tetanus. sent21: the crossopterygian is not a seeking if there is something such that that it is a seeking and it is an outbreak is not correct. sent22: if the host is a kind of a rabato it does seek. sent23: the abscission is not a rabato or it is not a nest or both if there is something such that it is not a seeking. sent24: the fact that that the host is not sociolinguistics and it does not number tetanus is not correct if the host is not a kind of a rabato hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the host is not a rabato.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the host is non-sociolinguistics thing that does not number tetanus is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the abscission is a nest.; sent15 -> int3: if either the abscission does not marble amputee or it is important or both it is not a nest.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the abscission is not a nest.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the host is a rabato.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the host does seek.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the fact that the host is a kind of an outbreak is right.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the host is a kind of a Utah and it is an outbreak.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__