the redbelly does not hack and does not braid Helotium.
sent1: that the zebra is a takin and is non-bloody does not hold if it is not a kind of an iron. sent2: if that there is something such that it is not a takin is correct then that the redbelly bloodies and it is popliteal does not hold. sent3: the redbelly does not braid Helotium if the fact that the zebra is a Knoxville but it does not braid Helotium is wrong. sent4: something that is meteoric thing that does not iron is not a hack. sent5: the fact that that the redbelly does not hack and does not braid Helotium is not right is right if the fact that the psychiatrist breakfasts suprematism hold. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a takin. sent7: if that something does iron and it is a hack is incorrect the fact that it does not hack is correct. sent8: the fact that that the redbelly is not a hack but it braids Helotium does not hold is true if the psychiatrist breakfasts suprematism. sent9: that the zebra is not popliteal and it is not an iron does not hold if the oxygenation is not meteoric. sent10: something is both meteoric and not an iron if the fact that it is not popliteal is not incorrect. sent11: something does not hack and does not braid Helotium if the fact that it is not an iron is true. sent12: the zebra is not meteoric and not weighty if it is a Knoxville. sent13: if the zebra is meteoric it is not weighty. sent14: that that the redbelly is not a kind of a hack and does braid Helotium is not true is not incorrect. sent15: the oxygenation is not a Knoxville. sent16: the oxygenation is not popliteal. sent17: if the zebra does bloody the psychiatrist does breakfast suprematism. sent18: if the zebra is not meteoric then that the suspension is an iron and a hack is not true. sent19: if the zebra is not weighty that the oxygenation is not a Knoxville and is not popliteal is not true. sent20: the fact that the zebra is a takin and it does bloody is false. sent21: the zebra is meteoric if the fact that it is an iron is true. sent22: the psychiatrist does breakfast suprematism if that the zebra is a takin and does not bloody does not hold. sent23: if that the zebra does not iron is not wrong then the fact that it is a takin that is bloody is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zebra does iron.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the zebra is not non-meteoric.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the zebra is not weighty.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: that the oxygenation is not a Knoxville and is not popliteal is not right.; sent15 & sent16 -> int4: the oxygenation is not a Knoxville and it is not popliteal.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the zebra does not iron is not false.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the zebra is a takin but not bloody is not right.; int7 & sent22 -> int8: the psychiatrist breakfasts suprematism.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the redbelly does not hack and it does not braid Helotium.
sent4 -> int9: the redbelly is not a hack if it is both meteoric and not an iron.; sent10 -> int10: if the redbelly is not popliteal then it is meteoric and not an iron.; sent6 & sent2 -> int11: the fact that the redbelly is bloody and popliteal does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the redbelly does not hack and does not braid Helotium. ; $context$ = sent1: that the zebra is a takin and is non-bloody does not hold if it is not a kind of an iron. sent2: if that there is something such that it is not a takin is correct then that the redbelly bloodies and it is popliteal does not hold. sent3: the redbelly does not braid Helotium if the fact that the zebra is a Knoxville but it does not braid Helotium is wrong. sent4: something that is meteoric thing that does not iron is not a hack. sent5: the fact that that the redbelly does not hack and does not braid Helotium is not right is right if the fact that the psychiatrist breakfasts suprematism hold. sent6: there exists something such that it is not a takin. sent7: if that something does iron and it is a hack is incorrect the fact that it does not hack is correct. sent8: the fact that that the redbelly is not a hack but it braids Helotium does not hold is true if the psychiatrist breakfasts suprematism. sent9: that the zebra is not popliteal and it is not an iron does not hold if the oxygenation is not meteoric. sent10: something is both meteoric and not an iron if the fact that it is not popliteal is not incorrect. sent11: something does not hack and does not braid Helotium if the fact that it is not an iron is true. sent12: the zebra is not meteoric and not weighty if it is a Knoxville. sent13: if the zebra is meteoric it is not weighty. sent14: that that the redbelly is not a kind of a hack and does braid Helotium is not true is not incorrect. sent15: the oxygenation is not a Knoxville. sent16: the oxygenation is not popliteal. sent17: if the zebra does bloody the psychiatrist does breakfast suprematism. sent18: if the zebra is not meteoric then that the suspension is an iron and a hack is not true. sent19: if the zebra is not weighty that the oxygenation is not a Knoxville and is not popliteal is not true. sent20: the fact that the zebra is a takin and it does bloody is false. sent21: the zebra is meteoric if the fact that it is an iron is true. sent22: the psychiatrist does breakfast suprematism if that the zebra is a takin and does not bloody does not hold. sent23: if that the zebra does not iron is not wrong then the fact that it is a takin that is bloody is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zebra does iron.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the zebra is not non-meteoric.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the zebra is not weighty.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: that the oxygenation is not a Knoxville and is not popliteal is not right.; sent15 & sent16 -> int4: the oxygenation is not a Knoxville and it is not popliteal.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the zebra does not iron is not false.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the zebra is a takin but not bloody is not right.; int7 & sent22 -> int8: the psychiatrist breakfasts suprematism.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__