that if the scald does not occur then that the pyrogenicness does not occur and the detachment occurs does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the fact that that the incubating occurs but the scald does not occur is right is not correct. sent2: not the relacing lifeboat but the culinariness occurs if the arming does not occur. sent3: if the housekeeping thirteen does not occur then both the non-tertianness and the relacing earliness occurs. sent4: the justifying caroche does not occur. sent5: both the sale and the non-evangelicalness happens. sent6: if the incubating does not occur the fact that not the pyrogenicness but the detachment happens is not true. sent7: the fact that both the pyrogenicness and the detachment happens is wrong. sent8: the liberating occurs. sent9: the fact that the incubating happens and the scalding happens is not true. sent10: the distraining happens. sent11: the subatomicness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the substitution does not occur and the trudge occurs is incorrect if the relacing mealberry does not occur. sent13: if the scald occurs the fact that the non-pyrogenicness and the detachment happens is false. sent14: that the fact that the pyrogenicness and the detachment happens is true is incorrect if that the scalding does not occur is not incorrect. sent15: if the incubating does not occur then that the pyrogenicness and the detachment occurs does not hold. sent16: that the shtik does not occur and the microscopy occurs does not hold if the sainthood does not occur. sent17: the Snow happens and the snag does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incubating happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scald does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the incubating happens and the scald does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the incubating does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that both the non-pyrogenicness and the detachment occurs is wrong.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the scald does not occur then that the pyrogenicness does not occur and the detachment occurs does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the incubating occurs but the scald does not occur is right is not correct. sent2: not the relacing lifeboat but the culinariness occurs if the arming does not occur. sent3: if the housekeeping thirteen does not occur then both the non-tertianness and the relacing earliness occurs. sent4: the justifying caroche does not occur. sent5: both the sale and the non-evangelicalness happens. sent6: if the incubating does not occur the fact that not the pyrogenicness but the detachment happens is not true. sent7: the fact that both the pyrogenicness and the detachment happens is wrong. sent8: the liberating occurs. sent9: the fact that the incubating happens and the scalding happens is not true. sent10: the distraining happens. sent11: the subatomicness does not occur. sent12: the fact that the substitution does not occur and the trudge occurs is incorrect if the relacing mealberry does not occur. sent13: if the scald occurs the fact that the non-pyrogenicness and the detachment happens is false. sent14: that the fact that the pyrogenicness and the detachment happens is true is incorrect if that the scalding does not occur is not incorrect. sent15: if the incubating does not occur then that the pyrogenicness and the detachment occurs does not hold. sent16: that the shtik does not occur and the microscopy occurs does not hold if the sainthood does not occur. sent17: the Snow happens and the snag does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the incubating happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scald does not occur.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the incubating happens and the scald does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the incubating does not occur.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that both the non-pyrogenicness and the detachment occurs is wrong.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__