the fact that not the nonmetallicness but the floundering Weismann happens does not hold.
sent1: the Uniateness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the meridionalness does not occur is true if the exsiccating chime does not occur. sent3: both the exsiccating orchiopexy and the recognizing happens if the Uniateness does not occur. sent4: if the meridionalness does not occur then that that the nonmetallicness does not occur and the floundering Weismann happens is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: the derailment and the rapping outskirt happens. sent6: that both the derailment and the exsiccating chime occurs prevents the recognizing.
sent5 -> int1: the derailment happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exsiccating chime happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the derailment happens and the exsiccating chime happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the recognizing does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: both the exsiccating orchiopexy and the recognizing occurs.; int4 -> int5: the recognizing happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the exsiccating chime does not occur.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: that the meridionalness does not occur hold.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the nonmetallicness but the floundering Weismann happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Uniateness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the meridionalness does not occur is true if the exsiccating chime does not occur. sent3: both the exsiccating orchiopexy and the recognizing happens if the Uniateness does not occur. sent4: if the meridionalness does not occur then that that the nonmetallicness does not occur and the floundering Weismann happens is incorrect is not wrong. sent5: the derailment and the rapping outskirt happens. sent6: that both the derailment and the exsiccating chime occurs prevents the recognizing. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the derailment happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exsiccating chime happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the derailment happens and the exsiccating chime happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the recognizing does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: both the exsiccating orchiopexy and the recognizing occurs.; int4 -> int5: the recognizing happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the exsiccating chime does not occur.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: that the meridionalness does not occur hold.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__