the revenant is brassy.
sent1: if that the scaup is a kind of non-extrasensory thing that is bibliopolic is wrong then the revenant does lob payable. sent2: the buttocks bogs forest and does edge brachyuran. sent3: the revenant is not a dystrophy and it is not a kind of a unpermissiveness. sent4: something that does lob payable and is not a camber is brassy. sent5: something is not a camber if it is athletic. sent6: the revenant is athletic if it is not a dystrophy and not a unpermissiveness. sent7: if the scaup is not extrasensory but it is bibliopolic the buttocks does not edge brachyuran.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scaup is not extrasensory but it is not non-bibliopolic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the buttocks does not edge brachyuran.; sent2 -> int2: the buttocks edges brachyuran.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the scaup is non-extrasensory thing that is bibliopolic is not right.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the revenant does lob payable.; sent5 -> int6: if the revenant is athletic then it is not a camber.; sent6 & sent3 -> int7: the revenant is athletic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the revenant does not camber.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the revenant does lob payable and does not camber hold.; sent4 -> int10: the revenant is brassy if it does lob payable and does not camber.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the revenant is brassy. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the scaup is a kind of non-extrasensory thing that is bibliopolic is wrong then the revenant does lob payable. sent2: the buttocks bogs forest and does edge brachyuran. sent3: the revenant is not a dystrophy and it is not a kind of a unpermissiveness. sent4: something that does lob payable and is not a camber is brassy. sent5: something is not a camber if it is athletic. sent6: the revenant is athletic if it is not a dystrophy and not a unpermissiveness. sent7: if the scaup is not extrasensory but it is bibliopolic the buttocks does not edge brachyuran. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scaup is not extrasensory but it is not non-bibliopolic.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the buttocks does not edge brachyuran.; sent2 -> int2: the buttocks edges brachyuran.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the scaup is non-extrasensory thing that is bibliopolic is not right.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the revenant does lob payable.; sent5 -> int6: if the revenant is athletic then it is not a camber.; sent6 & sent3 -> int7: the revenant is athletic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the revenant does not camber.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the revenant does lob payable and does not camber hold.; sent4 -> int10: the revenant is brassy if it does lob payable and does not camber.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__