that either the impairing cricketer does not occur or the acute happens or both is caused by the lobateness.
sent1: that the wheeling does not occur is not false. sent2: the impairing cricketer occurs and/or the acute happens. sent3: if that the boxing precentorship but not the impairing unnaturalness happens is incorrect then the detachableness does not occur. sent4: the knock does not occur. sent5: that the ranging does not occur and the busywork does not occur brings about that the lobateness happens. sent6: the Donneanness occurs if the fact that the lobateness does not occur and the impairing cricketer does not occur does not hold. sent7: both the acuteness and the impairing hookah happens if the detachableness does not occur. sent8: the busywork does not occur. sent9: that the fact that the lobateness does not occur and the impairing cricketer does not occur is true is not true if the acute happens. sent10: if the impairing cricketer happens then the range does not occur and the busywork does not occur. sent11: that the basking ruggedization does not occur and the DOS does not occur prevents the schlep. sent12: that not the ranging but the busywork occurs brings about the non-lobateness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lobateness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the impairing cricketer does not occur is incorrect.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the range does not occur and the busywork does not occur.;
the Donneanness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that either the impairing cricketer does not occur or the acute happens or both is caused by the lobateness. ; $context$ = sent1: that the wheeling does not occur is not false. sent2: the impairing cricketer occurs and/or the acute happens. sent3: if that the boxing precentorship but not the impairing unnaturalness happens is incorrect then the detachableness does not occur. sent4: the knock does not occur. sent5: that the ranging does not occur and the busywork does not occur brings about that the lobateness happens. sent6: the Donneanness occurs if the fact that the lobateness does not occur and the impairing cricketer does not occur does not hold. sent7: both the acuteness and the impairing hookah happens if the detachableness does not occur. sent8: the busywork does not occur. sent9: that the fact that the lobateness does not occur and the impairing cricketer does not occur is true is not true if the acute happens. sent10: if the impairing cricketer happens then the range does not occur and the busywork does not occur. sent11: that the basking ruggedization does not occur and the DOS does not occur prevents the schlep. sent12: that not the ranging but the busywork occurs brings about the non-lobateness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lobateness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the impairing cricketer does not occur is incorrect.; sent10 & assump2 -> int1: the range does not occur and the busywork does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__