that the toilet does descant but it does not perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is not true.
sent1: the Jersey is not a muon. sent2: the saddlebill is a kind of a Sarcobatus. sent3: the Jersey is not a Sarcobatus. sent4: if the Jersey is not a Sarcobatus then that it is a Ornithorhynchus and is not a Drake does not hold. sent5: if something is a trophotropism then it does perpetuate one-sixty-fourth. sent6: the fact that the fact that the toilet descants but it does not perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is incorrect if the student does perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is not wrong. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Ornithorhynchus that is not a kind of a Drake is not correct the student is a trophotropism.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Jersey is a kind of a Ornithorhynchus that is not a Drake is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Ornithorhynchus and it is not a kind of a Drake is not right.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the student is a trophotropism.; sent5 -> int4: the student perpetuates one-sixty-fourth if it is a kind of a trophotropism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the student does perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is not incorrect.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the toilet does descant but it does not perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Jersey is not a muon. sent2: the saddlebill is a kind of a Sarcobatus. sent3: the Jersey is not a Sarcobatus. sent4: if the Jersey is not a Sarcobatus then that it is a Ornithorhynchus and is not a Drake does not hold. sent5: if something is a trophotropism then it does perpetuate one-sixty-fourth. sent6: the fact that the fact that the toilet descants but it does not perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is incorrect if the student does perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is not wrong. sent7: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Ornithorhynchus that is not a kind of a Drake is not correct the student is a trophotropism. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the Jersey is a kind of a Ornithorhynchus that is not a Drake is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Ornithorhynchus and it is not a kind of a Drake is not right.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the student is a trophotropism.; sent5 -> int4: the student perpetuates one-sixty-fourth if it is a kind of a trophotropism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the student does perpetuate one-sixty-fourth is not incorrect.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__