the fact that the Ottawa is not tellurian is not false.
sent1: if that the Ottawa is a tellurian hold then the pick does bellow. sent2: the essayist is not urceolate if the chigoe is a Vasari but not urceolate. sent3: the pick is contestable. sent4: something that is cerebrovascular is coital. sent5: the fact that the essayist is allergenic and it is downtown is incorrect. sent6: if something is not allergenic then it is a tellurian and it is a bellows. sent7: the neutral is a wetter. sent8: if the essayist is not urceolate then that it is not a electroplater and/or it is a kind of a nightshirt is wrong. sent9: if that the Ottawa is not a kind of a tellurian but it is a kind of a bellows is incorrect then the alp is not a wetter. sent10: the neutral is allergenic if the pick is a bellows. sent11: if that the chigoe is not cerebrovascular hold the essayist is not cerebrovascular. sent12: if the neutral is coital then that the pick is not a wetter and it is non-downtown does not hold. sent13: the fact that if the fact that either something is not a electroplater or it is a nightshirt or both is wrong it is not contestable is right. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a epinephrine the chigoe is not urceolate. sent15: if something is not acaudate the chigoe is econometric and it is a kind of a Vasari. sent16: if the essayist is not allergenic then it is coital and a tellurian. sent17: if there is something such that it is not contestable the neutral is cerebrovascular. sent18: something is coital if that it is a kind of a downtown is incorrect. sent19: there exists something such that it is a epinephrine. sent20: that the essayist is not cerebrovascular hold if that the chigoe is a kind of contestable thing that is not cerebrovascular is false. sent21: the essayist is not a downtown if the neutral is both a wetter and allergenic. sent22: something is not acaudate. sent23: if the fact that the essayist is coital and it is tellurian is not correct the Ottawa is not a kind of a tellurian. sent24: the fact that that the chigoe is contestable and is cerebrovascular is not correct is not incorrect. sent25: a non-downtown thing is cerebrovascular and coital. sent26: the essayist is coital. sent27: the essayist is coital if that it is not a downtown hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ottawa is tellurian.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pick is a bellows.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the neutral is allergenic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the neutral is a wetter and it is allergenic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the essayist is not downtown.; sent25 -> int5: the essayist is both cerebrovascular and coital if it is non-downtown.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the essayist is cerebrovascular and is coital.; int6 -> int7: the essayist is cerebrovascular.; sent20 & sent24 -> int8: the essayist is not cerebrovascular.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the alp is not a wetter.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Ottawa is not tellurian is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Ottawa is a tellurian hold then the pick does bellow. sent2: the essayist is not urceolate if the chigoe is a Vasari but not urceolate. sent3: the pick is contestable. sent4: something that is cerebrovascular is coital. sent5: the fact that the essayist is allergenic and it is downtown is incorrect. sent6: if something is not allergenic then it is a tellurian and it is a bellows. sent7: the neutral is a wetter. sent8: if the essayist is not urceolate then that it is not a electroplater and/or it is a kind of a nightshirt is wrong. sent9: if that the Ottawa is not a kind of a tellurian but it is a kind of a bellows is incorrect then the alp is not a wetter. sent10: the neutral is allergenic if the pick is a bellows. sent11: if that the chigoe is not cerebrovascular hold the essayist is not cerebrovascular. sent12: if the neutral is coital then that the pick is not a wetter and it is non-downtown does not hold. sent13: the fact that if the fact that either something is not a electroplater or it is a nightshirt or both is wrong it is not contestable is right. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a epinephrine the chigoe is not urceolate. sent15: if something is not acaudate the chigoe is econometric and it is a kind of a Vasari. sent16: if the essayist is not allergenic then it is coital and a tellurian. sent17: if there is something such that it is not contestable the neutral is cerebrovascular. sent18: something is coital if that it is a kind of a downtown is incorrect. sent19: there exists something such that it is a epinephrine. sent20: that the essayist is not cerebrovascular hold if that the chigoe is a kind of contestable thing that is not cerebrovascular is false. sent21: the essayist is not a downtown if the neutral is both a wetter and allergenic. sent22: something is not acaudate. sent23: if the fact that the essayist is coital and it is tellurian is not correct the Ottawa is not a kind of a tellurian. sent24: the fact that that the chigoe is contestable and is cerebrovascular is not correct is not incorrect. sent25: a non-downtown thing is cerebrovascular and coital. sent26: the essayist is coital. sent27: the essayist is coital if that it is not a downtown hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Ottawa is tellurian.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the pick is a bellows.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the neutral is allergenic.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the neutral is a wetter and it is allergenic.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: the essayist is not downtown.; sent25 -> int5: the essayist is both cerebrovascular and coital if it is non-downtown.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the essayist is cerebrovascular and is coital.; int6 -> int7: the essayist is cerebrovascular.; sent20 & sent24 -> int8: the essayist is not cerebrovascular.; int7 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__