the fact that the triose is not a Gnostic but it does term psephologist does not hold.
sent1: if something is not a CAD then that it is a kind of fleshy thing that does not term psephologist is not right. sent2: the fact that the triose is non-Gnostic thing that does term psephologist is not correct if the hydrozoan is a registrar. sent3: the German is not Orthodox but it is a registrar if the verapamil is not a Gnostic. sent4: that the hydrozoan is not a quirk is not false. sent5: the fact that something does not promise but it is a slump does not hold if it is a registrar. sent6: the verapamil is not a Gnostic if there is something such that the fact that it is fleshy and it does not term psephologist is not true. sent7: the verapamil is Orthodox if there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent8: that something terms German and it is a CAD is not correct if it does not quirk. sent9: if the verapamil is not a kind of a slump and/or does creep the fact that it is not Orthodox is true. sent10: there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent11: something is not a CAD if the fact that it does term German and is a CAD is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the verapamil is not a slump or a creep or both.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the verapamil is not Orthodox.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: the verapamil is Orthodox.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the verapamil is not a slump and/or it is a creep is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not slump and/or it is a kind of a creep is not right.;
that the German is not a kind of a promise but it is a slump does not hold.
sent5 -> int6: the fact that the German is not a promise but it does slump does not hold if it is a registrar.; sent1 -> int7: the fact that the hydrozoan is fleshy but it does not term psephologist is not true if it is not a CAD.; sent11 -> int8: if the fact that the hydrozoan does term German and it is a CAD is wrong then it is not a CAD.; sent8 -> int9: if that the hydrozoan is not a quirk is not false that it does term German and is a CAD is false.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: that the hydrozoan does term German and is a CAD is not correct.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the hydrozoan is not a CAD.; int7 & int11 -> int12: that the hydrozoan is fleshy but it does not term psephologist is incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it is fleshy and does not term psephologist does not hold.; int13 & sent6 -> int14: the verapamil is not Gnostic.; sent3 & int14 -> int15: the German is not Orthodox and is a registrar.; int15 -> int16: that the German is a registrar is correct.; int6 & int16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the triose is not a Gnostic but it does term psephologist does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a CAD then that it is a kind of fleshy thing that does not term psephologist is not right. sent2: the fact that the triose is non-Gnostic thing that does term psephologist is not correct if the hydrozoan is a registrar. sent3: the German is not Orthodox but it is a registrar if the verapamil is not a Gnostic. sent4: that the hydrozoan is not a quirk is not false. sent5: the fact that something does not promise but it is a slump does not hold if it is a registrar. sent6: the verapamil is not a Gnostic if there is something such that the fact that it is fleshy and it does not term psephologist is not true. sent7: the verapamil is Orthodox if there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent8: that something terms German and it is a CAD is not correct if it does not quirk. sent9: if the verapamil is not a kind of a slump and/or does creep the fact that it is not Orthodox is true. sent10: there is something such that it is not fleshy. sent11: something is not a CAD if the fact that it does term German and is a CAD is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the verapamil is not a slump or a creep or both.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the verapamil is not Orthodox.; sent10 & sent7 -> int2: the verapamil is Orthodox.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the verapamil is not a slump and/or it is a creep is not true.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it does not slump and/or it is a kind of a creep is not right.; __UNKNOWN__