that the garnering Tobin occurs if the pitching WTV occurs is not right.
sent1: if the e-mail does not occur both the overtiring and the pitching WTV happens. sent2: the cakewalk occurs if the fact that the alliance but not the slaking occurs does not hold. sent3: if the cakewalk occurs then the garnering Tobin happens. sent4: the fact that the alliance but not the slaking occurs is false if the e-mail happens. sent5: either the cakewalking or that the garnering Tobin does not occur or both is triggered by that the caliconess happens. sent6: that both the alliance and the slaking happens is not right. sent7: that the pitching Muslimah does not occur is prevented by the eurythmy. sent8: the eurythmy does not occur and the interfacialness does not occur. sent9: that the nonpregnantness occurs and the caliconess occurs is triggered by that the eurythmy does not occur. sent10: that the alliance happens and the slaking happens is not right if the e-mailing happens. sent11: the e-mailing happens if the pitching WTV happens. sent12: the flocking happens if the cabotage happens. sent13: the cakewalking occurs if the slaking occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pitching WTV occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the e-mail happens.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the alliance happens and the slaking does not occur is wrong.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the cakewalk happens.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the garnering Tobin happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the overtiring happens is correct.
sent8 -> int5: the eurythmy does not occur.; sent9 & int5 -> int6: both the nonpregnantness and the caliconess occurs.; int6 -> int7: the calico happens.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: either the cakewalking happens or the garnering Tobin does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the garnering Tobin occurs if the pitching WTV occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the e-mail does not occur both the overtiring and the pitching WTV happens. sent2: the cakewalk occurs if the fact that the alliance but not the slaking occurs does not hold. sent3: if the cakewalk occurs then the garnering Tobin happens. sent4: the fact that the alliance but not the slaking occurs is false if the e-mail happens. sent5: either the cakewalking or that the garnering Tobin does not occur or both is triggered by that the caliconess happens. sent6: that both the alliance and the slaking happens is not right. sent7: that the pitching Muslimah does not occur is prevented by the eurythmy. sent8: the eurythmy does not occur and the interfacialness does not occur. sent9: that the nonpregnantness occurs and the caliconess occurs is triggered by that the eurythmy does not occur. sent10: that the alliance happens and the slaking happens is not right if the e-mailing happens. sent11: the e-mailing happens if the pitching WTV happens. sent12: the flocking happens if the cabotage happens. sent13: the cakewalking occurs if the slaking occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pitching WTV occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the e-mail happens.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the alliance happens and the slaking does not occur is wrong.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the cakewalk happens.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the garnering Tobin happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__