the noncurrentness does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the stultification does not occur and the destining does not occur is not true then the anoxemicness happens. sent2: if both the anoxemicness and the negotiating thought occurs then the partying does not occur. sent3: if the screamer happens then the negotiating thought occurs. sent4: that the non-conquerableness and the negotiating marcher occurs is not true. sent5: that the noncurrentness does not occur is not false if that the westernness and/or the trisecting seduction happens is not right. sent6: that the delegating happens is prevented by that the negotiating marcher does not occur. sent7: that the negotiating thought does not occur triggers that the destining does not occur and the anoxemicness occurs. sent8: that the delegating occurs does not hold if the fact that the conquerableness does not occur and the negotiating marcher happens is false. sent9: the stultification occurs. sent10: the fact that the trisecting seduction does not occur is not false if the fact that both the screamer and the trisecting seduction occurs is not true. sent11: the fact that the westernness occurs or the trisecting seduction occurs or both is wrong if the party does not occur. sent12: if the delegating does not occur then the screamer occurs. sent13: the trisecting seduction does not occur. sent14: the negotiating lizard happens if that the commercialization does not occur and the ugliness does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stultification does not occur and the destining does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the stultification does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stultification does not occur and the destining does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the anoxemicness happens.; sent8 & sent4 -> int5: the delegating does not occur.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the screamer occurs.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the negotiating thought happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the anoxemicness and the negotiating thought happens.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the party does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the fact that the westernness and/or the trisecting seduction happens is not right.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the noncurrentness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the noncurrentness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the stultification does not occur and the destining does not occur is not true then the anoxemicness happens. sent2: if both the anoxemicness and the negotiating thought occurs then the partying does not occur. sent3: if the screamer happens then the negotiating thought occurs. sent4: that the non-conquerableness and the negotiating marcher occurs is not true. sent5: that the noncurrentness does not occur is not false if that the westernness and/or the trisecting seduction happens is not right. sent6: that the delegating happens is prevented by that the negotiating marcher does not occur. sent7: that the negotiating thought does not occur triggers that the destining does not occur and the anoxemicness occurs. sent8: that the delegating occurs does not hold if the fact that the conquerableness does not occur and the negotiating marcher happens is false. sent9: the stultification occurs. sent10: the fact that the trisecting seduction does not occur is not false if the fact that both the screamer and the trisecting seduction occurs is not true. sent11: the fact that the westernness occurs or the trisecting seduction occurs or both is wrong if the party does not occur. sent12: if the delegating does not occur then the screamer occurs. sent13: the trisecting seduction does not occur. sent14: the negotiating lizard happens if that the commercialization does not occur and the ugliness does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stultification does not occur and the destining does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the stultification does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stultification does not occur and the destining does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the anoxemicness happens.; sent8 & sent4 -> int5: the delegating does not occur.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the screamer occurs.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the negotiating thought happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the anoxemicness and the negotiating thought happens.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the party does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: the fact that the westernness and/or the trisecting seduction happens is not right.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__