that the barbarizing does not occur yields that the metastableness does not occur and the secondment does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the ideologicalness does not occur hold. sent2: if the fact that the metastableness occurs hold the barbarizing occurs. sent3: the perinatalness does not occur. sent4: that the links occurs triggers that the unloosing listed does not occur. sent5: the links and/or the reverberantness happens. sent6: the hydropathy happens. sent7: if the enthusing does not occur then both the perinatalness and the parasympathetic occurs. sent8: that the tabulating choragus does not occur is brought about by that the metastableness occurs but the barbarizing does not occur. sent9: if the unloosing listed does not occur then the crashing does not occur. sent10: the secondment happens if the fact that the perinatalness happens hold. sent11: if both the parasympatheticness and the non-perinatalness occurs the secondment does not occur. sent12: if the barbarizing occurs then the metastableness does not occur and the secondment does not occur. sent13: that the manhunt happens is true. sent14: both the secondment and the perinatalness occurs if the crashing does not occur. sent15: that the oddsness happens is not incorrect. sent16: the parasympatheticness does not occur if the enthusing does not occur. sent17: the lexicographicness but not the strangling happens. sent18: the investing Fahd happens. sent19: the interconnection does not occur. sent20: the fact that the basiscopicness does not occur hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the metastableness happens.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the barbarizing happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barbarizing does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the metastableness does not occur is not wrong.;
the eddying occurs and the feeding does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the barbarizing does not occur yields that the metastableness does not occur and the secondment does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ideologicalness does not occur hold. sent2: if the fact that the metastableness occurs hold the barbarizing occurs. sent3: the perinatalness does not occur. sent4: that the links occurs triggers that the unloosing listed does not occur. sent5: the links and/or the reverberantness happens. sent6: the hydropathy happens. sent7: if the enthusing does not occur then both the perinatalness and the parasympathetic occurs. sent8: that the tabulating choragus does not occur is brought about by that the metastableness occurs but the barbarizing does not occur. sent9: if the unloosing listed does not occur then the crashing does not occur. sent10: the secondment happens if the fact that the perinatalness happens hold. sent11: if both the parasympatheticness and the non-perinatalness occurs the secondment does not occur. sent12: if the barbarizing occurs then the metastableness does not occur and the secondment does not occur. sent13: that the manhunt happens is true. sent14: both the secondment and the perinatalness occurs if the crashing does not occur. sent15: that the oddsness happens is not incorrect. sent16: the parasympatheticness does not occur if the enthusing does not occur. sent17: the lexicographicness but not the strangling happens. sent18: the investing Fahd happens. sent19: the interconnection does not occur. sent20: the fact that the basiscopicness does not occur hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the metastableness happens.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: the barbarizing happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barbarizing does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the metastableness does not occur is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__