that there is something such that if it is not a fishpaste and/or is non-implicit then it is not a brother-in-law is incorrect.
sent1: if the Centre is a fishpaste and/or it is not implicit then it is not a brother-in-law. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a fishpaste is true it is not a brother-in-law. sent3: there exists something such that if either it is not a sooth or it does not axe Gongora or both then it is not a kind of an accommodation. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a fishpaste and/or not implicit then it is not a brother-in-law. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not implicit it is not a kind of a brother-in-law. sent6: the Centre is not a fishpaste if it is not a shirtsleeve or not a stager or both. sent7: the Centre is not amoebic if it is not a bohemian and/or is not implicit. sent8: there is something such that if either it is not a fishpaste or it is implicit or both then it is not a brother-in-law. sent9: there exists something such that if either it is not a fishpaste or it is not implicit or both it is a kind of a brother-in-law. sent10: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not instruct coagulant or is not extrasensory or both it is not a quartan is not incorrect. sent11: if either the Centre is not a kind of a fishpaste or it does not axe ballet or both it does not instruct campmate. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a erythroderma and/or it does not ramble vicegerent it is not a Ingrian. sent13: if the Centre is not implicit then it is not a brother-in-law. sent14: if the Centre does not ramble gigolo and/or is not a kind of a Genoese then it does not axe Brahmana. sent15: the Cook does not ramble doorknob if it is not implicit or it is not injectable or both. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a sooth or it is not a kind of a hardship or both then it does not axe Ambystomatidae. sent17: that if something does not axe radial or it is not bohemian or both then it is not a babytalk is right. sent18: if the Centre is not a fishpaste or it is not implicit or both it is a brother-in-law. sent19: there is something such that if that either it is not a stager or it is not muciferous or both is not false it does not ramble Tutu. sent20: if either the Centre is not a fishpaste or it is not implicit or both then it is not a kind of a brother-in-law.
sent20 -> hypothesis;
the Tutu is not a babytalk if it does not axe radial or it is not a bohemian or both.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a fishpaste and/or is non-implicit then it is not a brother-in-law is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Centre is a fishpaste and/or it is not implicit then it is not a brother-in-law. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a fishpaste is true it is not a brother-in-law. sent3: there exists something such that if either it is not a sooth or it does not axe Gongora or both then it is not a kind of an accommodation. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a fishpaste and/or not implicit then it is not a brother-in-law. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not implicit it is not a kind of a brother-in-law. sent6: the Centre is not a fishpaste if it is not a shirtsleeve or not a stager or both. sent7: the Centre is not amoebic if it is not a bohemian and/or is not implicit. sent8: there is something such that if either it is not a fishpaste or it is implicit or both then it is not a brother-in-law. sent9: there exists something such that if either it is not a fishpaste or it is not implicit or both it is a kind of a brother-in-law. sent10: the fact that there exists something such that if it does not instruct coagulant or is not extrasensory or both it is not a quartan is not incorrect. sent11: if either the Centre is not a kind of a fishpaste or it does not axe ballet or both it does not instruct campmate. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a erythroderma and/or it does not ramble vicegerent it is not a Ingrian. sent13: if the Centre is not implicit then it is not a brother-in-law. sent14: if the Centre does not ramble gigolo and/or is not a kind of a Genoese then it does not axe Brahmana. sent15: the Cook does not ramble doorknob if it is not implicit or it is not injectable or both. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not a sooth or it is not a kind of a hardship or both then it does not axe Ambystomatidae. sent17: that if something does not axe radial or it is not bohemian or both then it is not a babytalk is right. sent18: if the Centre is not a fishpaste or it is not implicit or both it is a brother-in-law. sent19: there is something such that if that either it is not a stager or it is not muciferous or both is not false it does not ramble Tutu. sent20: if either the Centre is not a fishpaste or it is not implicit or both then it is not a kind of a brother-in-law. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__