the uptownness occurs.
sent1: both the inquisition and the sensitiveness happens if that the unapproachableness does not occur is right. sent2: the fact that the honestness and the dropping happens is false. sent3: the mock happens if the fact that the honestness and the drop happens is not right. sent4: the siliceousness occurs and/or the rich occurs. sent5: the impermeableness occurs. sent6: the laryngospasm does not occur. sent7: either that the inquisition happens or the basiscopicness or both leads to that the mocking does not occur. sent8: the Anguillan happens. sent9: the sensitiveness happens. sent10: if the drop does not occur then the mock happens. sent11: if the fact that the unapproachableness occurs and the confederating malignity occurs is not incorrect the uptown does not occur. sent12: that the cascading womanhood does not occur does not hold. sent13: the heterozygousness occurs and the confederating malignity occurs. sent14: both the lupineness and the peregrination happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unapproachableness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the inquisition happens and the sensitiveness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the inquisition occurs.; int2 -> int3: either the inquisition or the basiscopicness or both occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mocking does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the mock occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the unapproachableness happens.; sent13 -> int8: the confederating malignity happens.; int7 & int8 -> int9: both the unapproachableness and the confederating malignity occurs.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that both the cascading womanhood and the cascading mournfulness occurs is true.
$hypothesis$ = the uptownness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: both the inquisition and the sensitiveness happens if that the unapproachableness does not occur is right. sent2: the fact that the honestness and the dropping happens is false. sent3: the mock happens if the fact that the honestness and the drop happens is not right. sent4: the siliceousness occurs and/or the rich occurs. sent5: the impermeableness occurs. sent6: the laryngospasm does not occur. sent7: either that the inquisition happens or the basiscopicness or both leads to that the mocking does not occur. sent8: the Anguillan happens. sent9: the sensitiveness happens. sent10: if the drop does not occur then the mock happens. sent11: if the fact that the unapproachableness occurs and the confederating malignity occurs is not incorrect the uptown does not occur. sent12: that the cascading womanhood does not occur does not hold. sent13: the heterozygousness occurs and the confederating malignity occurs. sent14: both the lupineness and the peregrination happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unapproachableness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the inquisition happens and the sensitiveness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the inquisition occurs.; int2 -> int3: either the inquisition or the basiscopicness or both occurs.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mocking does not occur.; sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the mock occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the unapproachableness happens.; sent13 -> int8: the confederating malignity happens.; int7 & int8 -> int9: both the unapproachableness and the confederating malignity occurs.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__