the mastopexy does not occur.
sent1: that the mastopexy does not occur is triggered by that the updating kangaroo's-foot happens or the updating phalarope does not occur or both. sent2: the civility and the speaking cutlassfish occurs. sent3: if the fact that the epitaxy does not occur but the cackle happens is incorrect then the updating kangaroo's-foot happens. sent4: that the epitaxy does not occur and the cackle occurs brings about the speaking symphilid. sent5: if the speaking symphilid happens the fact that the sparging cataphatism does not occur and/or the concurrence does not occur is not true. sent6: that the civility occurs brings about that the sparging cataphatism does not occur or that the concurrence does not occur or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the epitaxy but the cackle occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the speaking symphilid happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the sparging cataphatism does not occur and/or the concurrence does not occur is wrong.; sent2 -> int3: that the civility happens is correct.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the sparging cataphatism does not occur or the concurrence does not occur or both.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fact that not the epitaxy but the cackling occurs is not false is not correct.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the updating kangaroo's-foot occurs.; int7 -> int8: either the updating kangaroo's-foot occurs or the updating phalarope does not occur or both.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the mastopexy does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the mastopexy does not occur is triggered by that the updating kangaroo's-foot happens or the updating phalarope does not occur or both. sent2: the civility and the speaking cutlassfish occurs. sent3: if the fact that the epitaxy does not occur but the cackle happens is incorrect then the updating kangaroo's-foot happens. sent4: that the epitaxy does not occur and the cackle occurs brings about the speaking symphilid. sent5: if the speaking symphilid happens the fact that the sparging cataphatism does not occur and/or the concurrence does not occur is not true. sent6: that the civility occurs brings about that the sparging cataphatism does not occur or that the concurrence does not occur or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the epitaxy but the cackle occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the speaking symphilid happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the sparging cataphatism does not occur and/or the concurrence does not occur is wrong.; sent2 -> int3: that the civility happens is correct.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the sparging cataphatism does not occur or the concurrence does not occur or both.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fact that not the epitaxy but the cackling occurs is not false is not correct.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the updating kangaroo's-foot occurs.; int7 -> int8: either the updating kangaroo's-foot occurs or the updating phalarope does not occur or both.; int8 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__