there is something such that if it is a eschatology then that it does not supple and it is grateful does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the compressor is not a pierid but it is noble does not hold if it is a japan. sent2: the fact that something is both not a eschatology and a broom is not true if it is not inconsiderable. sent3: if the flagellate is a suspicion then that it is non-hemiparasitic thing that is a eschatology is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a eschatology then it does not supple and it is grateful. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a perissodactyl the fact that it is not a laver and does lace abampere is incorrect. sent6: if the location is a eschatology the fact that it does supple and it is grateful is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a finery that it is not a kind of a Belize and it is a guideline is wrong. sent8: that the location is not a kind of a Enlightenment and does supple is incorrect if it emerges. sent9: if the location is grateful then the fact that it is both non-demotic and seminiferous is not true. sent10: if the location is a kind of a eschatology the fact that it does not supple and is grateful is false. sent11: that the Dominion is not a haemosporidian but it is little is false if it is a stock-in-trade. sent12: if the cookie is a kind of a flaw the fact that it supples and descries Tradescant does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it does concretize masseter the fact that it does not lace abampere and does concretize Korean does not hold. sent14: that something is not a kind of a rascality and is a blood-twig is wrong if the fact that it is afferent is correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a eschatology the fact that it does supple and it is grateful is not right. sent16: if the location checkers the fact that it does not concretize flagellate and it does supple is wrong. sent17: if the location is a kind of a eschatology it does not supple and it is not ungrateful.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the rimu is considerable that that it is not a eschatology and is a broom is correct does not hold.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a eschatology then that it does not supple and it is grateful does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the compressor is not a pierid but it is noble does not hold if it is a japan. sent2: the fact that something is both not a eschatology and a broom is not true if it is not inconsiderable. sent3: if the flagellate is a suspicion then that it is non-hemiparasitic thing that is a eschatology is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a eschatology then it does not supple and it is grateful. sent5: there is something such that if it is a kind of a perissodactyl the fact that it is not a laver and does lace abampere is incorrect. sent6: if the location is a eschatology the fact that it does supple and it is grateful is incorrect. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a finery that it is not a kind of a Belize and it is a guideline is wrong. sent8: that the location is not a kind of a Enlightenment and does supple is incorrect if it emerges. sent9: if the location is grateful then the fact that it is both non-demotic and seminiferous is not true. sent10: if the location is a kind of a eschatology the fact that it does not supple and is grateful is false. sent11: that the Dominion is not a haemosporidian but it is little is false if it is a stock-in-trade. sent12: if the cookie is a kind of a flaw the fact that it supples and descries Tradescant does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it does concretize masseter the fact that it does not lace abampere and does concretize Korean does not hold. sent14: that something is not a kind of a rascality and is a blood-twig is wrong if the fact that it is afferent is correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is a kind of a eschatology the fact that it does supple and it is grateful is not right. sent16: if the location checkers the fact that it does not concretize flagellate and it does supple is wrong. sent17: if the location is a kind of a eschatology it does not supple and it is not ungrateful. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__