that the fact that the pajama is a frustum and/or is not a twenty-nine if the eyelid is not unshrinkable is not wrong is incorrect.
sent1: the inhalation is a twenty-nine if it does debrief controlled and it is not an airflow. sent2: the eyelid is not shrinkable if there exists something such that the fact that it debriefs controlled and it is not an airflow is wrong. sent3: either the pajama is a twenty-nine or it does debrief controlled or both if the inhalation is not a frustum. sent4: if the pajama is not a twenty-nine then either the eyelid is an airflow or it is unshrinkable or both. sent5: the oriel does debrief controlled and is unshrinkable if the eyelid is not a twenty-nine. sent6: if the inhalation is a twenty-nine the pajama is a frustum and/or it is not a twenty-nine. sent7: the fact that if the inhalation is a twenty-nine the pajama does debrief controlled and/or it is not a twenty-nine is not wrong. sent8: the inhalation is a twenty-nine and/or it is not unshrinkable. sent9: there is something such that that it is unshrinkable but not a twenty-nine does not hold. sent10: either the inhalation is a twenty-nine or it is not a kind of a frustum or both. sent11: if the inhalation is a kind of a twenty-nine the pajama does debrief controlled and/or it is a twenty-nine. sent12: the inhalation is a kind of a twenty-nine or it is a frustum or both if the fact that the pajama does not debrief controlled is not wrong. sent13: the pajama is a frustum and/or is a twenty-nine. sent14: the pajama is unshrinkable but it is not a frustum. sent15: the eyelid is an airflow and/or not a twenty-nine if the pajama is unshrinkable. sent16: the pajama is a frustum and/or it is a twenty-nine if the inhalation is a twenty-nine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the inhalation debriefs controlled but it is not a kind of an airflow is wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does debrief controlled and it is not an airflow is not true.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the eyelid is unshrinkable.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the eyelid is not unshrinkable hold.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the inhalation does debrief controlled but it is not an airflow.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the inhalation is a twenty-nine.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the pajama is a frustum and/or is not a twenty-nine.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the oriel debriefs controlled.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the pajama is a frustum and/or is not a twenty-nine if the eyelid is not unshrinkable is not wrong is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the inhalation is a twenty-nine if it does debrief controlled and it is not an airflow. sent2: the eyelid is not shrinkable if there exists something such that the fact that it debriefs controlled and it is not an airflow is wrong. sent3: either the pajama is a twenty-nine or it does debrief controlled or both if the inhalation is not a frustum. sent4: if the pajama is not a twenty-nine then either the eyelid is an airflow or it is unshrinkable or both. sent5: the oriel does debrief controlled and is unshrinkable if the eyelid is not a twenty-nine. sent6: if the inhalation is a twenty-nine the pajama is a frustum and/or it is not a twenty-nine. sent7: the fact that if the inhalation is a twenty-nine the pajama does debrief controlled and/or it is not a twenty-nine is not wrong. sent8: the inhalation is a twenty-nine and/or it is not unshrinkable. sent9: there is something such that that it is unshrinkable but not a twenty-nine does not hold. sent10: either the inhalation is a twenty-nine or it is not a kind of a frustum or both. sent11: if the inhalation is a kind of a twenty-nine the pajama does debrief controlled and/or it is a twenty-nine. sent12: the inhalation is a kind of a twenty-nine or it is a frustum or both if the fact that the pajama does not debrief controlled is not wrong. sent13: the pajama is a frustum and/or is a twenty-nine. sent14: the pajama is unshrinkable but it is not a frustum. sent15: the eyelid is an airflow and/or not a twenty-nine if the pajama is unshrinkable. sent16: the pajama is a frustum and/or it is a twenty-nine if the inhalation is a twenty-nine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the inhalation debriefs controlled but it is not a kind of an airflow is wrong.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it does debrief controlled and it is not an airflow is not true.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the eyelid is unshrinkable.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the eyelid is not unshrinkable hold.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the inhalation does debrief controlled but it is not an airflow.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the inhalation is a twenty-nine.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the pajama is a frustum and/or is not a twenty-nine.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__