the urease is animatistic.
sent1: the fact that the saltwort does not numerate Marx and it is not a protohippus is not correct if something is not translunar. sent2: the saltwort does numerate Marx if the absorbate is a protohippus. sent3: there exists something such that that it is accessible is not wrong. sent4: that the lunula does field stationariness is not false if it is not a kind of a crossheading and numerates backsword. sent5: the fact that either the absorbate is plantal or it is not accessible or both is not true. sent6: the Mon reverberates and is not a kind of a phytotoxin if there is something such that it does field stationariness. sent7: if the lunula is not a trace then it is not a crossheading and does numerate backsword. sent8: the urease is a phytotoxin if the Mon does reverberate and is not a phytotoxin. sent9: if something does numerate Marx and is translunar then the urease is animatistic. sent10: the fact that something is animatistic is not false if it numerates Marx. sent11: the saltwort is prodromal and it is a kind of a phytotoxin. sent12: if the saltwort is prodromal it is translunar. sent13: that the absorbate does numerate Marx is true if there is something such that that it does not numerate Marx and is not a protohippus does not hold. sent14: the lunula is not a kind of a trace.
sent11 -> int1: the saltwort is prodromal.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the saltwort is translunar.;
the absorbate is animatistic.
sent10 -> int3: the absorbate is animatistic if it numerates Marx.; sent7 & sent14 -> int4: the lunula is not a crossheading and numerates backsword.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the lunula does field stationariness.; int5 -> int6: something fields stationariness.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the Mon reverberates and is not a phytotoxin.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the urease is a phytotoxin.;
$hypothesis$ = the urease is animatistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the saltwort does not numerate Marx and it is not a protohippus is not correct if something is not translunar. sent2: the saltwort does numerate Marx if the absorbate is a protohippus. sent3: there exists something such that that it is accessible is not wrong. sent4: that the lunula does field stationariness is not false if it is not a kind of a crossheading and numerates backsword. sent5: the fact that either the absorbate is plantal or it is not accessible or both is not true. sent6: the Mon reverberates and is not a kind of a phytotoxin if there is something such that it does field stationariness. sent7: if the lunula is not a trace then it is not a crossheading and does numerate backsword. sent8: the urease is a phytotoxin if the Mon does reverberate and is not a phytotoxin. sent9: if something does numerate Marx and is translunar then the urease is animatistic. sent10: the fact that something is animatistic is not false if it numerates Marx. sent11: the saltwort is prodromal and it is a kind of a phytotoxin. sent12: if the saltwort is prodromal it is translunar. sent13: that the absorbate does numerate Marx is true if there is something such that that it does not numerate Marx and is not a protohippus does not hold. sent14: the lunula is not a kind of a trace. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the saltwort is prodromal.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the saltwort is translunar.; __UNKNOWN__