the arming happens.
sent1: the immaterialness and the chastening occurs. sent2: the longitudinalness occurs. sent3: the mintiness occurs. sent4: the clot does not occur but the pneumaticsness occurs. sent5: that the debriefing absconder does not occur is brought about by the non-necroticness and/or that the debriefing absconder does not occur. sent6: the debriefing consulate does not occur. sent7: the fact that the debriefing importer occurs is true. sent8: if the papalness happens then the arming does not occur and the handling does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Parisian happens and the upholstery happens is wrong. sent10: that the pickings does not occur and the debriefing importer occurs does not hold if the arm does not occur. sent11: the nitrifying does not occur but the debriefing Gdansk occurs. sent12: not the pickings but the debriefing importer occurs. sent13: that not the entree but the electrification occurs is not right if the fact that the hardship does not occur is not wrong. sent14: both the pneumaticsness and the unimpressionableness happens if that the debriefing absconder does not occur is not wrong. sent15: if that not the papalness but the runicness happens is false the fact that the papalness does not occur is not correct. sent16: the fact that the debriefing Luculus does not occur and the diffusing powderpuff happens is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arming does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the pickings does not occur but the debriefing importer happens does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the arm does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the arming happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the immaterialness and the chastening occurs. sent2: the longitudinalness occurs. sent3: the mintiness occurs. sent4: the clot does not occur but the pneumaticsness occurs. sent5: that the debriefing absconder does not occur is brought about by the non-necroticness and/or that the debriefing absconder does not occur. sent6: the debriefing consulate does not occur. sent7: the fact that the debriefing importer occurs is true. sent8: if the papalness happens then the arming does not occur and the handling does not occur. sent9: the fact that the Parisian happens and the upholstery happens is wrong. sent10: that the pickings does not occur and the debriefing importer occurs does not hold if the arm does not occur. sent11: the nitrifying does not occur but the debriefing Gdansk occurs. sent12: not the pickings but the debriefing importer occurs. sent13: that not the entree but the electrification occurs is not right if the fact that the hardship does not occur is not wrong. sent14: both the pneumaticsness and the unimpressionableness happens if that the debriefing absconder does not occur is not wrong. sent15: if that not the papalness but the runicness happens is false the fact that the papalness does not occur is not correct. sent16: the fact that the debriefing Luculus does not occur and the diffusing powderpuff happens is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the arming does not occur.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the pickings does not occur but the debriefing importer happens does not hold.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__