if the inclusion is a tachistoscope that the snapper is not a harlequin-snake and is not anaesthetic is not right.
sent1: if that the inclusion is a tachistoscope is not wrong then that the snapper is a kind of a harlequin-snake but it is not anaesthetic is wrong. sent2: if that the fact that the inclusion dissembles broad-mindedness and is not a tachistoscope is not wrong is not correct the neptunium does not dissemble campaigning. sent3: that the snapper is not a harlequin-snake and it is not anaesthetic is incorrect if the inclusion is not a passion. sent4: that the fact that the fact that the caster dissembles broad-mindedness but it is not anaesthetic is true is not right is true if it is not a harlequin-snake. sent5: that the snapper is both not a passion and not a harlequin-snake does not hold if the inclusion is not a kind of a kurrat. sent6: something is not a kind of a tachistoscope but it dissembles campaigning if the fact that it does dissemble broad-mindedness is not correct. sent7: the fact that something is not a Gambia and is a kind of a passion is wrong if it does not dissemble campaigning. sent8: if that that the caster does dissemble broad-mindedness but it is not anaesthetic is not incorrect is not right the snapper does not dissemble broad-mindedness. sent9: something is a harlequin-snake that dissembles campaigning if it is not a passion.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the inclusion is not a passion and is a kind of a kurrat does not hold.; sent6 -> int1: if the inclusion does not dissemble broad-mindedness it is not a tachistoscope and it dissembles campaigning.;
the fact that the neptunium is both not a Gambia and a passion is incorrect.
sent7 -> int2: the fact that that the neptunium is not a Gambia but a passion does not hold hold if it does not dissemble campaigning.;
$hypothesis$ = if the inclusion is a tachistoscope that the snapper is not a harlequin-snake and is not anaesthetic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the inclusion is a tachistoscope is not wrong then that the snapper is a kind of a harlequin-snake but it is not anaesthetic is wrong. sent2: if that the fact that the inclusion dissembles broad-mindedness and is not a tachistoscope is not wrong is not correct the neptunium does not dissemble campaigning. sent3: that the snapper is not a harlequin-snake and it is not anaesthetic is incorrect if the inclusion is not a passion. sent4: that the fact that the fact that the caster dissembles broad-mindedness but it is not anaesthetic is true is not right is true if it is not a harlequin-snake. sent5: that the snapper is both not a passion and not a harlequin-snake does not hold if the inclusion is not a kind of a kurrat. sent6: something is not a kind of a tachistoscope but it dissembles campaigning if the fact that it does dissemble broad-mindedness is not correct. sent7: the fact that something is not a Gambia and is a kind of a passion is wrong if it does not dissemble campaigning. sent8: if that that the caster does dissemble broad-mindedness but it is not anaesthetic is not incorrect is not right the snapper does not dissemble broad-mindedness. sent9: something is a harlequin-snake that dissembles campaigning if it is not a passion. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the inclusion is not a passion and is a kind of a kurrat does not hold.; sent6 -> int1: if the inclusion does not dissemble broad-mindedness it is not a tachistoscope and it dissembles campaigning.; __UNKNOWN__