that the delegate does not breakfast allegiance and is ribless is incorrect if the inquirer does amerce lexicology.
sent1: the fact that something is both a carbonara and not black-and-white is wrong if that it does not amerce lexicology is right. sent2: the fact that the inquirer is chiasmal and braids Helotium does not hold. sent3: the delegate does not breakfast allegiance but it is ribless if the inquirer does amerce lexicology. sent4: if the bittercress braids election then the fact that the delegate does not braid Helotium but it is chiasmal does not hold. sent5: that the delegate does breakfast allegiance and it is ribless is not correct. sent6: if the inquirer braids Capsella then it is not chiasmal. sent7: the bittercress braids election if the fact that the tintack does not breakfast allegiance hold. sent8: if the inquirer is not chiasmal and it does not braid election the demiglace braids Helotium. sent9: if the demiglace is a Tawney that it is both high-tension and not a housewrecker is not true. sent10: the parodist does not amerce lexicology if the fact that the demiglace is not non-chiasmal and braids Capsella is wrong. sent11: something is not chiasmal if that it does not braid Helotium and it is chiasmal is wrong. sent12: if the inquirer is not bromidic it braids Capsella. sent13: if the inquirer is ribless it is not stainable. sent14: something is not chiasmal and it does not braid election if that it braids Capsella is correct. sent15: if the fact that the demiglace braids Helotium is right the fact that the delegate breakfasts allegiance and is ribless is wrong. sent16: the inquirer braids Capsella if that it is bromidic thing that is non-black-and-white is wrong. sent17: something is not chiasmal if it braids Capsella. sent18: the fact that something is both bromidic and not black-and-white is wrong if it does amerce lexicology.
sent18 -> int1: that the inquirer is both bromidic and not black-and-white is not correct if that it amerces lexicology is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inquirer amerces lexicology.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the inquirer is bromidic but not black-and-white is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the inquirer braids Capsella.; sent14 -> int4: if the inquirer braids Capsella then it is a kind of non-chiasmal thing that does not braid election.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inquirer is not chiasmal and does not braid election.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the demiglace braids Helotium.;
the fact that the parodist is a kind of a carbonara that is not black-and-white is not correct.
sent1 -> int7: if the parodist does not amerce lexicology then that it is a carbonara and is not black-and-white is not right.; sent11 -> int8: the delegate is not chiasmal if the fact that it does not braid Helotium and is chiasmal is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the delegate does not breakfast allegiance and is ribless is incorrect if the inquirer does amerce lexicology. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is both a carbonara and not black-and-white is wrong if that it does not amerce lexicology is right. sent2: the fact that the inquirer is chiasmal and braids Helotium does not hold. sent3: the delegate does not breakfast allegiance but it is ribless if the inquirer does amerce lexicology. sent4: if the bittercress braids election then the fact that the delegate does not braid Helotium but it is chiasmal does not hold. sent5: that the delegate does breakfast allegiance and it is ribless is not correct. sent6: if the inquirer braids Capsella then it is not chiasmal. sent7: the bittercress braids election if the fact that the tintack does not breakfast allegiance hold. sent8: if the inquirer is not chiasmal and it does not braid election the demiglace braids Helotium. sent9: if the demiglace is a Tawney that it is both high-tension and not a housewrecker is not true. sent10: the parodist does not amerce lexicology if the fact that the demiglace is not non-chiasmal and braids Capsella is wrong. sent11: something is not chiasmal if that it does not braid Helotium and it is chiasmal is wrong. sent12: if the inquirer is not bromidic it braids Capsella. sent13: if the inquirer is ribless it is not stainable. sent14: something is not chiasmal and it does not braid election if that it braids Capsella is correct. sent15: if the fact that the demiglace braids Helotium is right the fact that the delegate breakfasts allegiance and is ribless is wrong. sent16: the inquirer braids Capsella if that it is bromidic thing that is non-black-and-white is wrong. sent17: something is not chiasmal if it braids Capsella. sent18: the fact that something is both bromidic and not black-and-white is wrong if it does amerce lexicology. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: that the inquirer is both bromidic and not black-and-white is not correct if that it amerces lexicology is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inquirer amerces lexicology.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the inquirer is bromidic but not black-and-white is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the inquirer braids Capsella.; sent14 -> int4: if the inquirer braids Capsella then it is a kind of non-chiasmal thing that does not braid election.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inquirer is not chiasmal and does not braid election.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the demiglace braids Helotium.; __UNKNOWN__