if the Orangeman does not bawl runway that the runway is not gestational or it is not palpable or both is not true.
sent1: the runway is not gestational. sent2: something masks Orangeman if it bawls Pleurotus. sent3: if the runway masks Orangeman the Orangeman bawls runway. sent4: the Orangeman is not animalistic if it does not bawl runway. sent5: something does not bawl Kruger if it does not sensualize vesiculation. sent6: that the Orangeman does not narrate and/or it is not a Zoroastrianism is wrong. sent7: something is not cubic and it does not sensualize theology if that it is not animalistic is not incorrect. sent8: if something is not cubic it does not sensualize theology and it is not palpable. sent9: something does not bawl amorality and is not gestational if it does not sensualize theology. sent10: if the Orangeman does not bawl Pleurotus then the fact that the runway does not mask Orangeman or it does not bawl runway or both is incorrect. sent11: if something that is not cubic does not sensualize theology then it does bawl Pleurotus.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the runway is not gestational and/or is not palpable.; sent7 -> int1: the runway is not cubic and it does not sensualize theology if it is not animalistic.; sent11 -> int2: the runway does bawl Pleurotus if it is not cubic and it does not sensualize theology.; sent2 -> int3: if the runway does bawl Pleurotus then it masks Orangeman.;
the fact that the concoction does not bawl amorality and is not gestational is true.
sent9 -> int4: if the concoction does not sensualize theology it does not bawl amorality and it is not gestational.;
$hypothesis$ = if the Orangeman does not bawl runway that the runway is not gestational or it is not palpable or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the runway is not gestational. sent2: something masks Orangeman if it bawls Pleurotus. sent3: if the runway masks Orangeman the Orangeman bawls runway. sent4: the Orangeman is not animalistic if it does not bawl runway. sent5: something does not bawl Kruger if it does not sensualize vesiculation. sent6: that the Orangeman does not narrate and/or it is not a Zoroastrianism is wrong. sent7: something is not cubic and it does not sensualize theology if that it is not animalistic is not incorrect. sent8: if something is not cubic it does not sensualize theology and it is not palpable. sent9: something does not bawl amorality and is not gestational if it does not sensualize theology. sent10: if the Orangeman does not bawl Pleurotus then the fact that the runway does not mask Orangeman or it does not bawl runway or both is incorrect. sent11: if something that is not cubic does not sensualize theology then it does bawl Pleurotus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the runway is not gestational and/or is not palpable.; sent7 -> int1: the runway is not cubic and it does not sensualize theology if it is not animalistic.; sent11 -> int2: the runway does bawl Pleurotus if it is not cubic and it does not sensualize theology.; sent2 -> int3: if the runway does bawl Pleurotus then it masks Orangeman.; __UNKNOWN__