that the tumefaction is not a variance and is a manicurist is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is both a scuffle and not a cull is not true. sent2: if the adrenergic is a Sunderland and it is orthodontics the issue is not a kind of a thick-knee. sent3: the doe is a thick-knee. sent4: something is orthodontics if it is chiromantic. sent5: the adrenergic is a kind of a Sunderland if the specialization is a kind of a Sunderland. sent6: the tumefaction is not a Lin but it is intralobular. sent7: if the doe is non-intralobular thing that is a kind of a thick-knee then the tumefaction is not a variance. sent8: that the adrenergic is chiromantic is not false if there is something such that the fact that that it is both a scuffle and not a cull is not incorrect is incorrect. sent9: the tumefaction is a kind of a scuffle and it does clout salmonid. sent10: the doe is both not intralobular and a thick-knee if that the issue is not a kind of a thick-knee is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is intralobular and it is not a manicurist is correct. sent12: if the tangelo is a Sunderland then the specialization is a Sunderland. sent13: the daggerboard is not a hydroxyl. sent14: the doe is not a Sunderland. sent15: if the daggerboard is not a hydroxyl the tumefaction is a SCNT. sent16: the tangelo is a Sunderland. sent17: if the daggerboard is not a hydroxyl the tumefaction is a SCNT and a manicurist. sent18: if the doe is not a kind of a Sunderland that it is both not a thick-knee and not non-orthodontics does not hold.
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the adrenergic is chiromantic.; sent4 -> int2: the adrenergic is orthodontics if it is chiromantic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adrenergic is orthodontics.; sent12 & sent16 -> int4: the specialization is a Sunderland.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the adrenergic is a Sunderland.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the adrenergic is a Sunderland and orthodontics.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the issue is not a kind of a thick-knee.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the doe is non-intralobular but it is a thick-knee.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the tumefaction is not a variance.; sent17 & sent13 -> int10: the tumefaction is a kind of a SCNT and it is a manicurist.; int10 -> int11: the tumefaction is a manicurist.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
that the tumefaction is not a variance but it is a manicurist is not true.
sent18 & sent14 -> int12: that the doe is not a thick-knee and is orthodontics does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a thick-knee and it is orthodontics is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = that the tumefaction is not a variance and is a manicurist is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is both a scuffle and not a cull is not true. sent2: if the adrenergic is a Sunderland and it is orthodontics the issue is not a kind of a thick-knee. sent3: the doe is a thick-knee. sent4: something is orthodontics if it is chiromantic. sent5: the adrenergic is a kind of a Sunderland if the specialization is a kind of a Sunderland. sent6: the tumefaction is not a Lin but it is intralobular. sent7: if the doe is non-intralobular thing that is a kind of a thick-knee then the tumefaction is not a variance. sent8: that the adrenergic is chiromantic is not false if there is something such that the fact that that it is both a scuffle and not a cull is not incorrect is incorrect. sent9: the tumefaction is a kind of a scuffle and it does clout salmonid. sent10: the doe is both not intralobular and a thick-knee if that the issue is not a kind of a thick-knee is not wrong. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is intralobular and it is not a manicurist is correct. sent12: if the tangelo is a Sunderland then the specialization is a Sunderland. sent13: the daggerboard is not a hydroxyl. sent14: the doe is not a Sunderland. sent15: if the daggerboard is not a hydroxyl the tumefaction is a SCNT. sent16: the tangelo is a Sunderland. sent17: if the daggerboard is not a hydroxyl the tumefaction is a SCNT and a manicurist. sent18: if the doe is not a kind of a Sunderland that it is both not a thick-knee and not non-orthodontics does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent8 -> int1: the adrenergic is chiromantic.; sent4 -> int2: the adrenergic is orthodontics if it is chiromantic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the adrenergic is orthodontics.; sent12 & sent16 -> int4: the specialization is a Sunderland.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the adrenergic is a Sunderland.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the adrenergic is a Sunderland and orthodontics.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the issue is not a kind of a thick-knee.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the doe is non-intralobular but it is a thick-knee.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: the tumefaction is not a variance.; sent17 & sent13 -> int10: the tumefaction is a kind of a SCNT and it is a manicurist.; int10 -> int11: the tumefaction is a manicurist.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__