there exists something such that if the fact that it does not verbify expropriation and is a produce does not hold then it is not a kind of a Bahraini.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-half thing that is a fleabag does not hold it is not hydropathic. sent2: the blower is not a kind of a Bahraini if the fact that it does not verbify expropriation and it is a produce is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it does not verbify expropriation and it produces then it is not a Bahraini. sent4: the lisle is not nonradioactive if the fact that it produces and it is a kind of a flagship is not true. sent5: that there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-exuvial a historian does not hold then it is not a bacteriophage is correct. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not ectodermal and is a kind of a gorget is not true then it is not a straight. sent7: there is something such that if it sleepwalks it is not untheatrical. sent8: if that the blower does not verbify expropriation and is a produce is incorrect it is a Bahraini. sent9: the fact that if that something is not unbreakable but it does verbify expropriation is not right it is not noisy is right. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not a Frankfurt but a pimple is not correct then it is a kind of a Price. sent11: if that something is not a canola but it is infallible is not correct it is not a kind of a Bahraini. sent12: there is something such that if it does deglaze operator it is not phenotypical. sent13: there exists something such that if that it verbifies Raffia and it is a Luba is not correct then it is not a pueblo.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if that the placental is breakable thing that verbifies expropriation does not hold then the fact that it is not noisy is not incorrect.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not verbify expropriation and is a produce does not hold then it is not a kind of a Bahraini. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it is non-half thing that is a fleabag does not hold it is not hydropathic. sent2: the blower is not a kind of a Bahraini if the fact that it does not verbify expropriation and it is a produce is wrong. sent3: there is something such that if it does not verbify expropriation and it produces then it is not a Bahraini. sent4: the lisle is not nonradioactive if the fact that it produces and it is a kind of a flagship is not true. sent5: that there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-exuvial a historian does not hold then it is not a bacteriophage is correct. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not ectodermal and is a kind of a gorget is not true then it is not a straight. sent7: there is something such that if it sleepwalks it is not untheatrical. sent8: if that the blower does not verbify expropriation and is a produce is incorrect it is a Bahraini. sent9: the fact that if that something is not unbreakable but it does verbify expropriation is not right it is not noisy is right. sent10: there exists something such that if that it is not a Frankfurt but a pimple is not correct then it is a kind of a Price. sent11: if that something is not a canola but it is infallible is not correct it is not a kind of a Bahraini. sent12: there is something such that if it does deglaze operator it is not phenotypical. sent13: there exists something such that if that it verbifies Raffia and it is a Luba is not correct then it is not a pueblo. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__