that the person is not moneyless but it is inclusive if the turban is not unequivocal is wrong.
sent1: the person is not moneyless. sent2: if something is not a juggle it is not moneyless and it is inclusive. sent3: if the fact that the xylem is not hormonal is correct it is a kind of equivocal thing that is a tricycle. sent4: the turban is a juggle if the person is unequivocal. sent5: if something does not juggle then that it is not moneyless is true. sent6: the person is not moneyless but it is inclusive if the turban is unequivocal. sent7: if the fact that something does not juggle hold then it is equivocal and an epigram. sent8: if the person is unequivocal then the turban is inclusive. sent9: if the person juggles then the turban is unequivocal. sent10: the person is not moneyless if it is not a kind of a juggle. sent11: if the turban is equivocal the person is not moneyless. sent12: the tachometer is not moneyless.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the person juggles.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the turban is unequivocal is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the turban is not unequivocal.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the person does not juggle is not wrong.; sent2 -> int4: the person is not moneyless and is inclusive if that it does not juggle is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the person is not moneyless and is inclusive.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the dockyard is not unequivocal and is an epigram.
sent7 -> int6: if the dockyard is not a juggle it is not unequivocal and is a kind of an epigram.;
$hypothesis$ = that the person is not moneyless but it is inclusive if the turban is not unequivocal is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the person is not moneyless. sent2: if something is not a juggle it is not moneyless and it is inclusive. sent3: if the fact that the xylem is not hormonal is correct it is a kind of equivocal thing that is a tricycle. sent4: the turban is a juggle if the person is unequivocal. sent5: if something does not juggle then that it is not moneyless is true. sent6: the person is not moneyless but it is inclusive if the turban is unequivocal. sent7: if the fact that something does not juggle hold then it is equivocal and an epigram. sent8: if the person is unequivocal then the turban is inclusive. sent9: if the person juggles then the turban is unequivocal. sent10: the person is not moneyless if it is not a kind of a juggle. sent11: if the turban is equivocal the person is not moneyless. sent12: the tachometer is not moneyless. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the person juggles.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the turban is unequivocal is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the turban is not unequivocal.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the person does not juggle is not wrong.; sent2 -> int4: the person is not moneyless and is inclusive if that it does not juggle is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the person is not moneyless and is inclusive.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__