the bull's-eye is a facilitator.
sent1: the Lithuanian does trade. sent2: if something is not a kind of a wariness it is a facilitator and it patronizes teacart. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a spall and it does patronize clipboard is wrong the grammarian is not a trade. sent4: the Lithuanian does not patronize clipboard if the bull's-eye does not trade. sent5: something is not a kind of a wariness if that it is not nonenzymatic and is a wariness is not true. sent6: if something does patronize teacart then it is arachnoid. sent7: that the Lithuanian is a spall and it does patronize clipboard is not correct. sent8: if the bull's-eye does not patronize clipboard the nonsense is not a spall. sent9: the fact that the bull's-eye is not a kind of a facilitator is not false if it is not a spall and it does patronize clipboard. sent10: the Lithuanian is a spall. sent11: the nonsense does not patronize teacart if the Lithuanian is a trade. sent12: the bull's-eye is not a spall but it does patronize clipboard if the fact that the nonsense does not patronize teacart is right. sent13: the Lithuanian is not a spall if the fact that the bull's-eye does not patronize clipboard is not false.
sent11 & sent1 -> int1: the nonsense does not patronize teacart.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the bull's-eye is not a spall and patronizes clipboard.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the grammarian is not a trade but a arachnoid.
sent7 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is a spall and does patronize clipboard is wrong.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the grammarian is not a trade is not incorrect.; sent6 -> int5: the grammarian is a kind of a arachnoid if it patronizes teacart.; sent2 -> int6: the grammarian is a facilitator and does patronize teacart if it is not a kind of a wariness.; sent5 -> int7: if the fact that the grammarian is not nonenzymatic but it is a kind of a wariness is not correct then it is not a kind of a wariness.;
$hypothesis$ = the bull's-eye is a facilitator. ; $context$ = sent1: the Lithuanian does trade. sent2: if something is not a kind of a wariness it is a facilitator and it patronizes teacart. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a spall and it does patronize clipboard is wrong the grammarian is not a trade. sent4: the Lithuanian does not patronize clipboard if the bull's-eye does not trade. sent5: something is not a kind of a wariness if that it is not nonenzymatic and is a wariness is not true. sent6: if something does patronize teacart then it is arachnoid. sent7: that the Lithuanian is a spall and it does patronize clipboard is not correct. sent8: if the bull's-eye does not patronize clipboard the nonsense is not a spall. sent9: the fact that the bull's-eye is not a kind of a facilitator is not false if it is not a spall and it does patronize clipboard. sent10: the Lithuanian is a spall. sent11: the nonsense does not patronize teacart if the Lithuanian is a trade. sent12: the bull's-eye is not a spall but it does patronize clipboard if the fact that the nonsense does not patronize teacart is right. sent13: the Lithuanian is not a spall if the fact that the bull's-eye does not patronize clipboard is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent1 -> int1: the nonsense does not patronize teacart.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the bull's-eye is not a spall and patronizes clipboard.; int2 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__