the screaming happens.
sent1: that the admissibleness and the cluttering happens causes that the brachialness happens. sent2: if the brachialness occurs then that the praetorship does not occur and the supposing does not occur does not hold. sent3: the commentating occurs. sent4: the screaming happens if the fact that the praetorship does not occur and the supposing does not occur does not hold. sent5: the fact that the tinging does not occur is correct if the fact that the cloistering does not occur and the bordering saiga happens is not correct. sent6: the fact that the fact that the tinging does not occur and/or the inadmissibleness occurs is true does not hold if the clutter does not occur. sent7: the cluttering occurs. sent8: the ting happens. sent9: the praetorship and the supposing occurs if the syncarpousness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the non-brachialness and the clutter occurs does not hold if the praetorship occurs. sent11: if that the inadmissibleness happens is correct that the cloistering does not occur but the bordering saiga happens does not hold. sent12: the fact that the spreading does not occur and the Turkey occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inadmissibleness happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cloister does not occur but the bordering saiga occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the ting does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the inadmissibleness does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: both the admissibleness and the cluttering occurs.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the brachialness occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the fact that the praetorship does not occur and the supposing does not occur is wrong.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the scream does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the screaming happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the admissibleness and the cluttering happens causes that the brachialness happens. sent2: if the brachialness occurs then that the praetorship does not occur and the supposing does not occur does not hold. sent3: the commentating occurs. sent4: the screaming happens if the fact that the praetorship does not occur and the supposing does not occur does not hold. sent5: the fact that the tinging does not occur is correct if the fact that the cloistering does not occur and the bordering saiga happens is not correct. sent6: the fact that the fact that the tinging does not occur and/or the inadmissibleness occurs is true does not hold if the clutter does not occur. sent7: the cluttering occurs. sent8: the ting happens. sent9: the praetorship and the supposing occurs if the syncarpousness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the non-brachialness and the clutter occurs does not hold if the praetorship occurs. sent11: if that the inadmissibleness happens is correct that the cloistering does not occur but the bordering saiga happens does not hold. sent12: the fact that the spreading does not occur and the Turkey occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inadmissibleness happens.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the cloister does not occur but the bordering saiga occurs does not hold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the ting does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the inadmissibleness does not occur.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: both the admissibleness and the cluttering occurs.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the brachialness occurs.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the fact that the praetorship does not occur and the supposing does not occur is wrong.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__