the fact that there exists something such that if it is an astringent then the fact that it is both not an ephedrine and not intense is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a audiometry it is not monocotyledonous and it does not swallow. sent2: if the cine-camera is an astringent then it is not an ephedrine and not intense. sent3: if the cine-camera is intense that it is not a legend and it does not rustle detonator does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is an astringent the fact that it is not an ephedrine but intense is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it is fashionable the fact that it does not reseed and is not topless is false. sent6: if the cine-camera is a tagasaste then that it is not an ephedrine but a peradventure is wrong. sent7: that something does not reimburse Calypso and is not a kind of a slouch is wrong if it is regional. sent8: that the cine-camera is an ephedrine but it is not intense is incorrect if it is an astringent. sent9: if the cine-camera is not nonastringent the fact that it is both not an ephedrine and intense is not true. sent10: the fact that something is limbed thing that is not frictional does not hold if the fact that it is abstract is not wrong. sent11: if that the cine-camera is not nonastringent hold then the fact that it is not autumnal and is a minuteness is not correct. sent12: the cine-camera is not intense and does not destain merchandise if it is a kind of a recruiter. sent13: there exists something such that if it is astringent then the fact that the fact that it is an ephedrine and is not intense is true does not hold. sent14: if the cheerer does weld perch that it is not a legend and not an ephedrine does not hold. sent15: the fact that the cine-camera is both not an ephedrine and not intense is not right if it is an astringent.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is regional then the fact that it does not reimburse Calypso and is not a kind of a slouch is not correct.
sent7 -> int1: if the Calypso is not non-regional then the fact that it does not reimburse Calypso and it is not a slouch is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is an astringent then the fact that it is both not an ephedrine and not intense is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a audiometry it is not monocotyledonous and it does not swallow. sent2: if the cine-camera is an astringent then it is not an ephedrine and not intense. sent3: if the cine-camera is intense that it is not a legend and it does not rustle detonator does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is an astringent the fact that it is not an ephedrine but intense is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if it is fashionable the fact that it does not reseed and is not topless is false. sent6: if the cine-camera is a tagasaste then that it is not an ephedrine but a peradventure is wrong. sent7: that something does not reimburse Calypso and is not a kind of a slouch is wrong if it is regional. sent8: that the cine-camera is an ephedrine but it is not intense is incorrect if it is an astringent. sent9: if the cine-camera is not nonastringent the fact that it is both not an ephedrine and intense is not true. sent10: the fact that something is limbed thing that is not frictional does not hold if the fact that it is abstract is not wrong. sent11: if that the cine-camera is not nonastringent hold then the fact that it is not autumnal and is a minuteness is not correct. sent12: the cine-camera is not intense and does not destain merchandise if it is a kind of a recruiter. sent13: there exists something such that if it is astringent then the fact that the fact that it is an ephedrine and is not intense is true does not hold. sent14: if the cheerer does weld perch that it is not a legend and not an ephedrine does not hold. sent15: the fact that the cine-camera is both not an ephedrine and not intense is not right if it is an astringent. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__