the scrod is a kind of a senator.
sent1: the scrod is both not a Prosopium and a Electrophoridae. sent2: the grison is non-medical. sent3: there is something such that it is medical. sent4: if the grison stales then the scrod is a senator but it is not a carrack. sent5: the grison is both not medical and stale if there is something such that it does not formalize privacy. sent6: the grison is not medical and is a senator. sent7: the pancake is not a carrack. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a carrack that the grison is not medical is correct. sent9: the scrod is not Ibsenian. sent10: the fact that the grison is medical is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it does not formalize privacy is correct. sent11: if something stales then it either does not formalize privacy or is medical or both. sent12: if the grison does stale then the scrod is not a carrack. sent13: that the scrod is not Himalayan hold. sent14: the grison is medical but it is not a senator if the scrod is stale. sent15: the conservatory is not medical. sent16: the scrod is medical and is not a carrack. sent17: there is something such that it does not formalize privacy. sent18: the scrod is not cismontane. sent19: the ilama is a senator.
sent17 & sent5 -> int1: the grison is non-medical and stale.; int1 -> int2: the grison is stale.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the scrod is both a senator and not a carrack is not false.; int3 -> hypothesis;
the scrod is not a kind of a senator.
sent11 -> int4: if the scrod does stale either it does not formalize privacy or it is medical or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the scrod is a kind of a senator. ; $context$ = sent1: the scrod is both not a Prosopium and a Electrophoridae. sent2: the grison is non-medical. sent3: there is something such that it is medical. sent4: if the grison stales then the scrod is a senator but it is not a carrack. sent5: the grison is both not medical and stale if there is something such that it does not formalize privacy. sent6: the grison is not medical and is a senator. sent7: the pancake is not a carrack. sent8: if there exists something such that it is not a carrack that the grison is not medical is correct. sent9: the scrod is not Ibsenian. sent10: the fact that the grison is medical is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it does not formalize privacy is correct. sent11: if something stales then it either does not formalize privacy or is medical or both. sent12: if the grison does stale then the scrod is not a carrack. sent13: that the scrod is not Himalayan hold. sent14: the grison is medical but it is not a senator if the scrod is stale. sent15: the conservatory is not medical. sent16: the scrod is medical and is not a carrack. sent17: there is something such that it does not formalize privacy. sent18: the scrod is not cismontane. sent19: the ilama is a senator. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent5 -> int1: the grison is non-medical and stale.; int1 -> int2: the grison is stale.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the scrod is both a senator and not a carrack is not false.; int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__