there exists something such that if it is not machine-made and does not carjack nailhead then the fact that it does not flock triplet is correct.
sent1: that the acclimatization is not a dipper hold if it is not wireless and it does not carjack nailhead. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not filter and is a kind of a sit-up hold it is not a kind of a prolegomenon. sent3: there is something such that if it does not alibi and it is not intransitive then the fact that it is not unfathomable is not wrong. sent4: if the acclimatization is not machine-made but it does carjack nailhead then it does not flock triplet. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a thermometer and it is unfathomable it does not segregate yak. sent6: the acclimatization flocks triplet if it is non-machine-made thing that does not carjack nailhead. sent7: the acclimatization does not flock triplet if it is not machine-made and it does not carjack nailhead. sent8: there is something such that if it does not flock bluegill and is unshapely then it is not a dovecote. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is machine-made thing that does not carjack nailhead is right then it does not flock triplet. sent10: the fact that there is something such that if it does not segregate scrunch and does not segregate phylloquinone it is not acetylenic is true. sent11: there exists something such that if it is non-machine-made and it does not carjack nailhead it flocks triplet.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not machine-made and does not carjack nailhead then the fact that it does not flock triplet is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the acclimatization is not a dipper hold if it is not wireless and it does not carjack nailhead. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it does not filter and is a kind of a sit-up hold it is not a kind of a prolegomenon. sent3: there is something such that if it does not alibi and it is not intransitive then the fact that it is not unfathomable is not wrong. sent4: if the acclimatization is not machine-made but it does carjack nailhead then it does not flock triplet. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a thermometer and it is unfathomable it does not segregate yak. sent6: the acclimatization flocks triplet if it is non-machine-made thing that does not carjack nailhead. sent7: the acclimatization does not flock triplet if it is not machine-made and it does not carjack nailhead. sent8: there is something such that if it does not flock bluegill and is unshapely then it is not a dovecote. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is machine-made thing that does not carjack nailhead is right then it does not flock triplet. sent10: the fact that there is something such that if it does not segregate scrunch and does not segregate phylloquinone it is not acetylenic is true. sent11: there exists something such that if it is non-machine-made and it does not carjack nailhead it flocks triplet. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__