the nomad is a phenol that does bow fusillade.
sent1: the fact that the PSA is a hoist and does bow fusillade does not hold. sent2: the nomad is a kind of a hoist. sent3: if either the PSA is a kind of a bipedalism or it is not a hoist or both the nomad is a phenol. sent4: the PSA hoists. sent5: the nomad does tinge clansman if the peccary is not a phenol. sent6: the fact that the nomad is a kind of a phenol and it does bow fusillade does not hold if something does tinge clansman. sent7: the peccary is a bipedalism if the fact that the PSA does not tinge clansman and is a phenol is false. sent8: something is a bipedalism. sent9: the PSA tinges clansman if the fact that the peccary does not bow fusillade but it is a bipedalism does not hold. sent10: if the nomad is a Cebuella it does tinge nomad. sent11: the nomad is a rappee. sent12: the PSA is a phenol. sent13: if that the PSA does not bow fusillade is not incorrect the nomad is a kind of a bipedalism. sent14: the peccary does not normalize suprematist and does bow Janissary. sent15: something hoists. sent16: the nomad is a kind of a bipedalism. sent17: the PSA is a kind of a bipedalism. sent18: if something is not thinkable the fact that it is not aneuploid and not identical is not right. sent19: if something is automatic it is a kind of a bipedalism and/or it is not a kind of a hoist. sent20: the PSA is an automatic if the fact that the peccary is both not aneuploid and not identical is false. sent21: something does tinge clansman if it does tinge nomad. sent22: if that the PSA is not a hoist and is a bipedalism does not hold the peccary tinges clansman. sent23: the peccary is not thinkable if the fact that it does not normalize suprematist and bows Janissary is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the PSA is not a hoist and is a bipedalism.; assump1 -> int1: the PSA does not hoist.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the PSA is not a kind of a hoist but it is a kind of a bipedalism is right is wrong.; sent22 & int3 -> int4: the peccary tinges clansman.; int4 -> int5: something does tinge clansman.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the nomad is a phenol and it does bow fusillade.
sent19 -> int6: the PSA is a bipedalism or it is not a hoist or both if it is an automatic.; sent18 -> int7: that the peccary is not aneuploid and not identical is false if it is not thinkable.; sent23 & sent14 -> int8: the peccary is not thinkable.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the peccary is non-aneuploid thing that is not identical does not hold.; sent20 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the PSA is automatic is not incorrect.; int6 & int10 -> int11: either the PSA is a kind of a bipedalism or it is not a hoist or both.; sent3 & int11 -> int12: the nomad is a kind of a phenol.; sent21 -> int13: that the nomad does tinge clansman if the nomad tinges nomad is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the nomad is a phenol that does bow fusillade. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the PSA is a hoist and does bow fusillade does not hold. sent2: the nomad is a kind of a hoist. sent3: if either the PSA is a kind of a bipedalism or it is not a hoist or both the nomad is a phenol. sent4: the PSA hoists. sent5: the nomad does tinge clansman if the peccary is not a phenol. sent6: the fact that the nomad is a kind of a phenol and it does bow fusillade does not hold if something does tinge clansman. sent7: the peccary is a bipedalism if the fact that the PSA does not tinge clansman and is a phenol is false. sent8: something is a bipedalism. sent9: the PSA tinges clansman if the fact that the peccary does not bow fusillade but it is a bipedalism does not hold. sent10: if the nomad is a Cebuella it does tinge nomad. sent11: the nomad is a rappee. sent12: the PSA is a phenol. sent13: if that the PSA does not bow fusillade is not incorrect the nomad is a kind of a bipedalism. sent14: the peccary does not normalize suprematist and does bow Janissary. sent15: something hoists. sent16: the nomad is a kind of a bipedalism. sent17: the PSA is a kind of a bipedalism. sent18: if something is not thinkable the fact that it is not aneuploid and not identical is not right. sent19: if something is automatic it is a kind of a bipedalism and/or it is not a kind of a hoist. sent20: the PSA is an automatic if the fact that the peccary is both not aneuploid and not identical is false. sent21: something does tinge clansman if it does tinge nomad. sent22: if that the PSA is not a hoist and is a bipedalism does not hold the peccary tinges clansman. sent23: the peccary is not thinkable if the fact that it does not normalize suprematist and bows Janissary is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the PSA is not a hoist and is a bipedalism.; assump1 -> int1: the PSA does not hoist.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the PSA is not a kind of a hoist but it is a kind of a bipedalism is right is wrong.; sent22 & int3 -> int4: the peccary tinges clansman.; int4 -> int5: something does tinge clansman.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__