the say causes the non-lymphaticness.
sent1: if the warming and the unimodalness happens the cosmolatry does not occur. sent2: the fact that the say does not occur is true if both the overthrow and the lymphaticness occurs. sent3: the riposting Pamlico happens. sent4: that both the overthrow and the lymphaticness happens yields the say. sent5: the riposting Pamlico happens and the overthrow occurs. sent6: the lymphaticness is triggered by the saying.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the say occurs.; sent5 -> int1: the overthrow occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lymphaticness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the overthrowing happens and the lymphaticness happens.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the say does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the lymphaticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the say causes the non-lymphaticness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the warming and the unimodalness happens the cosmolatry does not occur. sent2: the fact that the say does not occur is true if both the overthrow and the lymphaticness occurs. sent3: the riposting Pamlico happens. sent4: that both the overthrow and the lymphaticness happens yields the say. sent5: the riposting Pamlico happens and the overthrow occurs. sent6: the lymphaticness is triggered by the saying. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the say occurs.; sent5 -> int1: the overthrow occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the lymphaticness happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the overthrowing happens and the lymphaticness happens.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the say does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the lymphaticness does not occur.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__