that the muggee is not an angle is not incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that something is not low-tech and it is not a grating is not right it is not a kind of an angle. sent2: the muggee is not a kind of an angle if it grates. sent3: if something is a grating it does not angle. sent4: the fact that the muggee is not non-clerical hold. sent5: if the feist is a binary then the muggee is a kind of a gentrification. sent6: if the feist does not hypothecate feist and it is not hot then it is a kind of a binary. sent7: if the muggee is clerical that it is not low-tech and it is not a grating does not hold. sent8: if the feist does not hypothecate Greek it angles and it is clerical. sent9: the fact that the patio doctors Scombridae and it is not provident is not correct. sent10: the Greek is a grating. sent11: if that the toddler foreshows hedonist and does not hold does not hold the fact that it foreshows lunger is right. sent12: the fact that the feist does not hypothecate feist is not incorrect if that the patio doctors Scombridae and is improvident does not hold. sent13: that the toddler foreshows hedonist and is not a hold is wrong. sent14: the fact that the muggee is not low-tech but it is a grating is not true. sent15: if the muggee is clerical the fact that the fact that it is not low-tech and it grates is not false is not correct. sent16: the fact that the Visayan hypothecates Greek but it is not an angle does not hold if the muggee is a gentrification. sent17: the feist is both not hot and a rhyolite if the toddler does foreshow lunger. sent18: if that something does hypothecate Greek but it does not angle is not correct then it does angle.
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the muggee is not low-tech and not a grating is wrong.; sent1 -> int2: if that the muggee is not low-tech and it does not grate is wrong then it is not an angle.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the muggee is an angle hold.
$hypothesis$ = that the muggee is not an angle is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not low-tech and it is not a grating is not right it is not a kind of an angle. sent2: the muggee is not a kind of an angle if it grates. sent3: if something is a grating it does not angle. sent4: the fact that the muggee is not non-clerical hold. sent5: if the feist is a binary then the muggee is a kind of a gentrification. sent6: if the feist does not hypothecate feist and it is not hot then it is a kind of a binary. sent7: if the muggee is clerical that it is not low-tech and it is not a grating does not hold. sent8: if the feist does not hypothecate Greek it angles and it is clerical. sent9: the fact that the patio doctors Scombridae and it is not provident is not correct. sent10: the Greek is a grating. sent11: if that the toddler foreshows hedonist and does not hold does not hold the fact that it foreshows lunger is right. sent12: the fact that the feist does not hypothecate feist is not incorrect if that the patio doctors Scombridae and is improvident does not hold. sent13: that the toddler foreshows hedonist and is not a hold is wrong. sent14: the fact that the muggee is not low-tech but it is a grating is not true. sent15: if the muggee is clerical the fact that the fact that it is not low-tech and it grates is not false is not correct. sent16: the fact that the Visayan hypothecates Greek but it is not an angle does not hold if the muggee is a gentrification. sent17: the feist is both not hot and a rhyolite if the toddler does foreshow lunger. sent18: if that something does hypothecate Greek but it does not angle is not correct then it does angle. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the muggee is not low-tech and not a grating is wrong.; sent1 -> int2: if that the muggee is not low-tech and it does not grate is wrong then it is not an angle.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__