that there is something such that if the fact that it is both meager and not a ivied is not right it does not repine indenture is not wrong.
sent1: the impressionist does repine indenture if that it is meager and it is not a kind of a ivied does not hold. sent2: if the impressionist is meager and is not a kind of a ivied then that it does not repine indenture is right. sent3: if the fact that the impressionist is meager and not a ivied is not right then it does not repine indenture. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a kind of triangulate thing that does not front foxhound is false then it does enthrone. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not meager then it does not repine indenture.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if the fact that it is both meager and not a ivied is not right it does not repine indenture is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the impressionist does repine indenture if that it is meager and it is not a kind of a ivied does not hold. sent2: if the impressionist is meager and is not a kind of a ivied then that it does not repine indenture is right. sent3: if the fact that the impressionist is meager and not a ivied is not right then it does not repine indenture. sent4: there is something such that if that it is a kind of triangulate thing that does not front foxhound is false then it does enthrone. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not meager then it does not repine indenture. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__