that the palatinate is not a craft and it is not a blaring is false if the fossilization is a namby-pamby.
sent1: the fabric is not delicate and/or it is not a kind of a denizen. sent2: the fact that the palatinate is not a kind of a craft and it is not a blaring does not hold if the fossilization does not craft. sent3: the palatinate is tartaric. sent4: if the itinerary is fascist the Jeroboam does pan startup. sent5: if the fossilization is annexational then the dowdy is a kind of a namby-pamby that is not a craft. sent6: if something that crafts is a kind of a Bletilla it is not a kind of a namby-pamby. sent7: the fact that the fact that the palatinate is not a craft but it is a blaring does not hold if the fossilization does not craft is correct. sent8: the fact that something is not a Blida and is not a kind of a Bletilla is not true if it is not a kind of a craft. sent9: something does vex Kamia if it is bedless. sent10: the fossilization is annexational if the palatinate is not annexational but it is a blaring. sent11: if something vexes Kamia the fact that it does not assemble and it radicalizes is incorrect. sent12: if the fossilization crafts that the palatinate is not a kind of a blaring and it is not a Bletilla is not correct. sent13: the fossilization is a Bletilla. sent14: something is not annexational but it is a blaring if it is not a Rabat. sent15: the palatinate mediates. sent16: the itinerary is a kind of a denizen if the fabric is not delicate. sent17: if the itinerary is a kind of a denizen then it is bedless. sent18: if the fossilization is a blaring the palatinate is not a kind of a namby-pamby and it is not a craft. sent19: if the fact that something does not assemble but it does radicalize is not right then it is a fascist. sent20: the palatinate is a namby-pamby and it does decorate Newtonian. sent21: the itinerary is a denizen if the fabric is not a denizen.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fossilization does craft.; assump2 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the fossilization does craft and it is a kind of a Bletilla is not wrong.; sent6 -> int2: the fossilization is not a namby-pamby if it is a craft and is a kind of a Bletilla.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fossilization is not a namby-pamby.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fossilization is a namby-pamby.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fossilization does not craft.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the palatinate is not a craft and is not a blaring is not right.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dowdy is not a Blida and it is not a Bletilla does not hold.
sent8 -> int7: that the dowdy is not a Blida and not a Bletilla is not true if it does not craft.; sent14 -> int8: the palatinate is not annexational but it is a kind of a blaring if it is not a Rabat.; sent19 -> int9: the fact that the itinerary is fascist is not false if that it does not assemble and it does radicalize is not right.; sent11 -> int10: the fact that if the itinerary vexes Kamia then that the itinerary does not assemble and does radicalize is wrong is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int11: the itinerary vexes Kamia if it is bedless.; sent1 & sent16 & sent21 -> int12: the itinerary is a denizen.; sent17 & int12 -> int13: the itinerary is bedless.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the itinerary vexes Kamia.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the itinerary does not assemble and radicalizes is not correct.; int9 & int15 -> int16: the itinerary is a kind of a fascist.; sent4 & int16 -> int17: the Jeroboam pans startup.; int17 -> int18: either the Jeroboam does pan startup or it is a kind of a graveness or both.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that it does pan startup or is a kind of a graveness or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the palatinate is not a craft and it is not a blaring is false if the fossilization is a namby-pamby. ; $context$ = sent1: the fabric is not delicate and/or it is not a kind of a denizen. sent2: the fact that the palatinate is not a kind of a craft and it is not a blaring does not hold if the fossilization does not craft. sent3: the palatinate is tartaric. sent4: if the itinerary is fascist the Jeroboam does pan startup. sent5: if the fossilization is annexational then the dowdy is a kind of a namby-pamby that is not a craft. sent6: if something that crafts is a kind of a Bletilla it is not a kind of a namby-pamby. sent7: the fact that the fact that the palatinate is not a craft but it is a blaring does not hold if the fossilization does not craft is correct. sent8: the fact that something is not a Blida and is not a kind of a Bletilla is not true if it is not a kind of a craft. sent9: something does vex Kamia if it is bedless. sent10: the fossilization is annexational if the palatinate is not annexational but it is a blaring. sent11: if something vexes Kamia the fact that it does not assemble and it radicalizes is incorrect. sent12: if the fossilization crafts that the palatinate is not a kind of a blaring and it is not a Bletilla is not correct. sent13: the fossilization is a Bletilla. sent14: something is not annexational but it is a blaring if it is not a Rabat. sent15: the palatinate mediates. sent16: the itinerary is a kind of a denizen if the fabric is not delicate. sent17: if the itinerary is a kind of a denizen then it is bedless. sent18: if the fossilization is a blaring the palatinate is not a kind of a namby-pamby and it is not a craft. sent19: if the fact that something does not assemble but it does radicalize is not right then it is a fascist. sent20: the palatinate is a namby-pamby and it does decorate Newtonian. sent21: the itinerary is a denizen if the fabric is not a denizen. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fossilization does craft.; assump2 & sent13 -> int1: the fact that the fossilization does craft and it is a kind of a Bletilla is not wrong.; sent6 -> int2: the fossilization is not a namby-pamby if it is a craft and is a kind of a Bletilla.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fossilization is not a namby-pamby.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fossilization is a namby-pamby.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fossilization does not craft.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the palatinate is not a craft and is not a blaring is not right.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__