the Jacobeanness occurs.
sent1: the promissoriness does not occur if that both the softening and the promissoriness happens is not correct. sent2: that both the non-intimalness and the emendation happens does not hold if the deserving dress happens. sent3: that the assuming does not occur is not incorrect if that not the intimalness but the emendation occurs is incorrect. sent4: that the quarterbacking does not occur and the strangulating hopefulness occurs is triggered by the deserving Tongan. sent5: the fact that the softening and the promissoriness happens is incorrect if the quarterbacking does not occur. sent6: that the modeling does not occur and/or the assuming does not occur does not hold. sent7: if that the supportiveness does not occur or the resisting mentalism does not occur or both is not true then the fact that the Jacobeanness happens is not incorrect. sent8: that the resisting mentalism does not occur brings about that the imitativeness does not occur. sent9: if the shamble does not occur the deserving dress occurs and the strangulating documentary occurs. sent10: either the newsreel occurs or the Philistine happens or both. sent11: that the resisting mentalism does not occur leads to that the imitativeness occurs. sent12: the fact that if the promissoriness occurs that the imitativeness happens is not incorrect is not wrong. sent13: if the supportiveness does not occur then the imitativeness does not occur. sent14: the promissoriness happens. sent15: if the newsreel occurs the shamble does not occur. sent16: the deserving Tongan occurs if the assuming does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the supportiveness does not occur or the resisting mentalism does not occur or both is not wrong.; assump1 & sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the imitativeness does not occur.; sent12 & sent14 -> int2: the imitativeness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the supportiveness does not occur or the resisting mentalism does not occur or both is not correct.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the Jacobean does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Jacobeanness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the promissoriness does not occur if that both the softening and the promissoriness happens is not correct. sent2: that both the non-intimalness and the emendation happens does not hold if the deserving dress happens. sent3: that the assuming does not occur is not incorrect if that not the intimalness but the emendation occurs is incorrect. sent4: that the quarterbacking does not occur and the strangulating hopefulness occurs is triggered by the deserving Tongan. sent5: the fact that the softening and the promissoriness happens is incorrect if the quarterbacking does not occur. sent6: that the modeling does not occur and/or the assuming does not occur does not hold. sent7: if that the supportiveness does not occur or the resisting mentalism does not occur or both is not true then the fact that the Jacobeanness happens is not incorrect. sent8: that the resisting mentalism does not occur brings about that the imitativeness does not occur. sent9: if the shamble does not occur the deserving dress occurs and the strangulating documentary occurs. sent10: either the newsreel occurs or the Philistine happens or both. sent11: that the resisting mentalism does not occur leads to that the imitativeness occurs. sent12: the fact that if the promissoriness occurs that the imitativeness happens is not incorrect is not wrong. sent13: if the supportiveness does not occur then the imitativeness does not occur. sent14: the promissoriness happens. sent15: if the newsreel occurs the shamble does not occur. sent16: the deserving Tongan occurs if the assuming does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the supportiveness does not occur or the resisting mentalism does not occur or both is not wrong.; assump1 & sent13 & sent8 -> int1: the imitativeness does not occur.; sent12 & sent14 -> int2: the imitativeness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the supportiveness does not occur or the resisting mentalism does not occur or both is not correct.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__