there is something such that it does not abjure reconditeness.
sent1: there exists something such that it is an escort. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that that it is not cash-and-carry and blemishes Nasser is true is incorrect then that the tile is not a tragus is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that it lulls Higi. sent4: if the fact that that the trumpetfish is a kind of an escort that does not blemish Nasser is correct is not true that the tile does blemish Nasser is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that it is not cash-and-carry and it does escort. sent6: there is something such that it is not an escort and it abjures reconditeness. sent7: the inpatient is not cash-and-carry if there exists something such that the fact that it does not abjure reconditeness is not false. sent8: if that the tile is a tragus but it is not an escort does not hold then the trumpetfish does escort. sent9: the fact that something is an escort and does not abjure reconditeness is false if that it is cash-and-carry hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not non-cash-and-carry is correct then the fact that it is not a tragus and does blemish Nasser is not right. sent11: that the fusil is ascetic and it is a tragus is incorrect. sent12: that the inpatient is not a tragus is not incorrect. sent13: the trumpetfish is cash-and-carry if that the tile is both an escort and not cash-and-carry is not right. sent14: that the trumpetfish is cash-and-carry but it does not abjure reconditeness is not correct. sent15: the fact that the tile is not an escort and is cash-and-carry does not hold if the fact that it blemishes Nasser hold. sent16: that the fact that the inpatient does not abjure reconditeness and is cash-and-carry does not hold is true. sent17: the fact that the tile is a tragus and it is cash-and-carry does not hold. sent18: there is something such that it does blemish turnoff. sent19: that the southwester is cash-and-carry and it does pique is not right. sent20: there is something such that that it is a kind of a colored and preserves June is not right. sent21: the inpatient does not abjure reconditeness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tragus and does blemish Nasser is not correct. sent22: that the tile is an escort but it is not cash-and-carry is not correct.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the trumpetfish is not a kind of a tragus and blemishes Nasser is incorrect if that it is cash-and-carry is true.; sent13 & sent22 -> int2: the trumpetfish is cash-and-carry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the trumpetfish is not a kind of a tragus and blemishes Nasser is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a tragus and it does blemish Nasser is not right.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the inpatient does not abjure reconditeness.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the county is not an escort.
sent9 -> int6: the fact that the county is an escort but it does not abjure reconditeness is not true if it is cash-and-carry.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does not abjure reconditeness. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is an escort. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that that it is not cash-and-carry and blemishes Nasser is true is incorrect then that the tile is not a tragus is not wrong. sent3: there is something such that it lulls Higi. sent4: if the fact that that the trumpetfish is a kind of an escort that does not blemish Nasser is correct is not true that the tile does blemish Nasser is not wrong. sent5: there exists something such that it is not cash-and-carry and it does escort. sent6: there is something such that it is not an escort and it abjures reconditeness. sent7: the inpatient is not cash-and-carry if there exists something such that the fact that it does not abjure reconditeness is not false. sent8: if that the tile is a tragus but it is not an escort does not hold then the trumpetfish does escort. sent9: the fact that something is an escort and does not abjure reconditeness is false if that it is cash-and-carry hold. sent10: if the fact that something is not non-cash-and-carry is correct then the fact that it is not a tragus and does blemish Nasser is not right. sent11: that the fusil is ascetic and it is a tragus is incorrect. sent12: that the inpatient is not a tragus is not incorrect. sent13: the trumpetfish is cash-and-carry if that the tile is both an escort and not cash-and-carry is not right. sent14: that the trumpetfish is cash-and-carry but it does not abjure reconditeness is not correct. sent15: the fact that the tile is not an escort and is cash-and-carry does not hold if the fact that it blemishes Nasser hold. sent16: that the fact that the inpatient does not abjure reconditeness and is cash-and-carry does not hold is true. sent17: the fact that the tile is a tragus and it is cash-and-carry does not hold. sent18: there is something such that it does blemish turnoff. sent19: that the southwester is cash-and-carry and it does pique is not right. sent20: there is something such that that it is a kind of a colored and preserves June is not right. sent21: the inpatient does not abjure reconditeness if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a tragus and does blemish Nasser is not correct. sent22: that the tile is an escort but it is not cash-and-carry is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the trumpetfish is not a kind of a tragus and blemishes Nasser is incorrect if that it is cash-and-carry is true.; sent13 & sent22 -> int2: the trumpetfish is cash-and-carry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the trumpetfish is not a kind of a tragus and blemishes Nasser is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a tragus and it does blemish Nasser is not right.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the inpatient does not abjure reconditeness.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__