not the excusing saury but the objection occurs.
sent1: that the impacting Beatitude does not occur triggers that the excusing saury does not occur but the objection occurs. sent2: the Irish occurs. sent3: that the excusing saury occurs and/or the objection does not occur does not hold if the chorionicness happens. sent4: the impacting Beatitude does not occur and the shivering subshrub happens. sent5: the fact that the fact that not the excusing saury but the objection occurs is wrong if the impacting Beatitude occurs hold. sent6: the shivering subshrub occurs if that the excusing saury happens and/or the objection does not occur is false.
sent4 -> int1: the impacting Beatitude does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the excusing saury does not occur but the objection happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = not the excusing saury but the objection occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the impacting Beatitude does not occur triggers that the excusing saury does not occur but the objection occurs. sent2: the Irish occurs. sent3: that the excusing saury occurs and/or the objection does not occur does not hold if the chorionicness happens. sent4: the impacting Beatitude does not occur and the shivering subshrub happens. sent5: the fact that the fact that not the excusing saury but the objection occurs is wrong if the impacting Beatitude occurs hold. sent6: the shivering subshrub occurs if that the excusing saury happens and/or the objection does not occur is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the impacting Beatitude does not occur.; sent1 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__