the tomboy is a bodied and it is ameboid.
sent1: the Netherlander dissimulates. sent2: if something destines oblivion and it does scald Franco then it is ameboid. sent3: the fact that the Netherlander destines oblivion is not false. sent4: the fact that the simvastatin scalds enterostomy and does not destine oblivion is not true. sent5: the tomboy does not age. sent6: something is a kind of a bodied if it dissimulates and it is not a Osmanthus. sent7: the tomboy destines oblivion but it does not scald Franco. sent8: if something does bespangle materialization then it is not a arctiid. sent9: something is not a perennial if that it does dissimulate and is not a Osmanthus does not hold. sent10: if something is stemless then it is not a bodied. sent11: The fact that the hee-haw does not bespangle Netherlander hold. sent12: if the tomboy is a bowfin then the Netherlander scalds enterostomy. sent13: if the Netherlander does not bespangle hee-haw then that it does not scald Ixodidae and is not steroidal is wrong. sent14: the fact that the Netherlander does not bespangle hee-haw hold. sent15: something is ameboid if it destines oblivion and it does not scald Franco. sent16: the tomboy does not scald Franco. sent17: if that the Netherlander does not scald Ixodidae and is not steroidal is false then it does not scald enterostomy. sent18: that either the simvastatin is a perennial or it is not a bowfin or both is not correct if it is stemless. sent19: if the fact that the simvastatin either is a perennial or is not a bowfin or both does not hold the Netherlander is not a bowfin. sent20: the lepidocrocite is extrasystolic if it is ameboid and it is not a kind of a feint. sent21: the simvastatin is stemless if the snowdrop is not stemless but it does scald enterostomy. sent22: something that is a kind of a bowfin does not body. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it does scald enterostomy and it does not destine oblivion is incorrect then the Netherlander is not stemless.
sent9 -> int1: the tomboy is not a perennial if that it does dissimulate and it is not a kind of a Osmanthus is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the tomboy dissimulates but it is not a Osmanthus is right is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tomboy is not a perennial.; sent13 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the Netherlander does not scald Ixodidae and it is not steroidal is not correct.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the Netherlander does not scald enterostomy.; sent6 -> int5: if the tomboy dissimulates but it is not a Osmanthus it is a bodied.; sent15 -> int6: the tomboy is ameboid if it does destine oblivion and it does not scald Franco.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the tomboy is ameboid.;
the tomboy is both parhelic and temperate.
$hypothesis$ = the tomboy is a bodied and it is ameboid. ; $context$ = sent1: the Netherlander dissimulates. sent2: if something destines oblivion and it does scald Franco then it is ameboid. sent3: the fact that the Netherlander destines oblivion is not false. sent4: the fact that the simvastatin scalds enterostomy and does not destine oblivion is not true. sent5: the tomboy does not age. sent6: something is a kind of a bodied if it dissimulates and it is not a Osmanthus. sent7: the tomboy destines oblivion but it does not scald Franco. sent8: if something does bespangle materialization then it is not a arctiid. sent9: something is not a perennial if that it does dissimulate and is not a Osmanthus does not hold. sent10: if something is stemless then it is not a bodied. sent11: The fact that the hee-haw does not bespangle Netherlander hold. sent12: if the tomboy is a bowfin then the Netherlander scalds enterostomy. sent13: if the Netherlander does not bespangle hee-haw then that it does not scald Ixodidae and is not steroidal is wrong. sent14: the fact that the Netherlander does not bespangle hee-haw hold. sent15: something is ameboid if it destines oblivion and it does not scald Franco. sent16: the tomboy does not scald Franco. sent17: if that the Netherlander does not scald Ixodidae and is not steroidal is false then it does not scald enterostomy. sent18: that either the simvastatin is a perennial or it is not a bowfin or both is not correct if it is stemless. sent19: if the fact that the simvastatin either is a perennial or is not a bowfin or both does not hold the Netherlander is not a bowfin. sent20: the lepidocrocite is extrasystolic if it is ameboid and it is not a kind of a feint. sent21: the simvastatin is stemless if the snowdrop is not stemless but it does scald enterostomy. sent22: something that is a kind of a bowfin does not body. sent23: if there exists something such that the fact that it does scald enterostomy and it does not destine oblivion is incorrect then the Netherlander is not stemless. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the tomboy is not a perennial if that it does dissimulate and it is not a kind of a Osmanthus is wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the tomboy dissimulates but it is not a Osmanthus is right is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the tomboy is not a perennial.; sent13 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the Netherlander does not scald Ixodidae and it is not steroidal is not correct.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the Netherlander does not scald enterostomy.; sent6 -> int5: if the tomboy dissimulates but it is not a Osmanthus it is a bodied.; sent15 -> int6: the tomboy is ameboid if it does destine oblivion and it does not scald Franco.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the tomboy is ameboid.; __UNKNOWN__