the BS is not a chalice.
sent1: the fact that the BS does not rede beaver hold. sent2: if the Norvasc is not noncaloric then the BS does not rede Gorgon. sent3: the chick is not androgynous. sent4: if something does not fret molecule it does not rede rested. sent5: if something does not rede Gorgon it is not androgynous. sent6: that the lineman is not a kind of a rubicelle and redes Gorgon does not hold. sent7: the BS is not sapphirine. sent8: if the lineman is not a chalice that it is not cytotoxic and is androgynous is false. sent9: that the fact that the quira is a chalice and androgynous hold does not hold if the BS does not rede Gorgon. sent10: the fact that the apar is a kind of non-androgynous thing that is an overture is wrong. sent11: if that the watch is not a clamber but a rough is wrong it does not shoo airworthiness. sent12: the earthnut is not cytotoxic. sent13: if the lineman does not rede Gorgon then the BS is not a kind of a chalice. sent14: the lineman is non-androgynous. sent15: something that is not non-axiomatic is both not non-cementitious and non-noncaloric. sent16: that something does not rede Gorgon and is androgynous is not true if it is noncaloric. sent17: something is not a chalice if the fact that it is a kind of a chalice and it is androgynous is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that something is not a clamber but it is cytotoxic is not true then it does not rede Gorgon. sent19: the fact that the BS is not a chalice but it is centesimal is incorrect.
sent18 -> int1: if that the lineman does not clamber and is cytotoxic is not right then the fact that it does not rede Gorgon is not wrong.;
the quira is not a chalice.
sent17 -> int2: if that the fact that the quira is a chalice that is androgynous is not wrong is wrong it is not a kind of a chalice.; sent15 -> int3: the Norvasc is a kind of cementitious thing that is not noncaloric if it is axiomatic.;
$hypothesis$ = the BS is not a chalice. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the BS does not rede beaver hold. sent2: if the Norvasc is not noncaloric then the BS does not rede Gorgon. sent3: the chick is not androgynous. sent4: if something does not fret molecule it does not rede rested. sent5: if something does not rede Gorgon it is not androgynous. sent6: that the lineman is not a kind of a rubicelle and redes Gorgon does not hold. sent7: the BS is not sapphirine. sent8: if the lineman is not a chalice that it is not cytotoxic and is androgynous is false. sent9: that the fact that the quira is a chalice and androgynous hold does not hold if the BS does not rede Gorgon. sent10: the fact that the apar is a kind of non-androgynous thing that is an overture is wrong. sent11: if that the watch is not a clamber but a rough is wrong it does not shoo airworthiness. sent12: the earthnut is not cytotoxic. sent13: if the lineman does not rede Gorgon then the BS is not a kind of a chalice. sent14: the lineman is non-androgynous. sent15: something that is not non-axiomatic is both not non-cementitious and non-noncaloric. sent16: that something does not rede Gorgon and is androgynous is not true if it is noncaloric. sent17: something is not a chalice if the fact that it is a kind of a chalice and it is androgynous is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that something is not a clamber but it is cytotoxic is not true then it does not rede Gorgon. sent19: the fact that the BS is not a chalice but it is centesimal is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: if that the lineman does not clamber and is cytotoxic is not right then the fact that it does not rede Gorgon is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__