the infiltrator is a kind of a stirrup.
sent1: if the bromide is not unfashionable then the fact that the polyploid is not a kind of a disfranchisement and it is not Bayesian is false. sent2: the bromide limes game. sent3: if the bromide is not Bayesian the fact that the polyploid does not lime game but it is a Macrorhamphosidae is incorrect. sent4: The game limes bromide. sent5: the infiltrator is a kind of a stirrup if that the polyploid is not a kind of a stirrup and/or it is unfashionable is not true. sent6: the infiltrator is not a stirrup if that the polyploid is Bayesian hold. sent7: the polyploid is not a stirrup if it does not lime game and is a kind of a disfranchisement. sent8: that that the polyploid does not lime game and is a Macrorhamphosidae does not hold is not wrong if the bromide is not a disfranchisement. sent9: the infiltrator is not a kind of a stirrup if that the polyploid is not a kind of a disfranchisement and is not Bayesian is false. sent10: the bromide is not a Macrorhamphosidae. sent11: the fact that something is not unfashionable if it is not a Macrorhamphosidae and does lime game is not incorrect.
sent11 -> int1: if the bromide is not a kind of a Macrorhamphosidae and does lime game it is not unfashionable.; sent10 & sent2 -> int2: the bromide is not a kind of a Macrorhamphosidae but it limes game.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bromide is not unfashionable.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that that the polyploid is both not a disfranchisement and not Bayesian is not incorrect is not correct.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the infiltrator is a stirrup.
$hypothesis$ = the infiltrator is a kind of a stirrup. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bromide is not unfashionable then the fact that the polyploid is not a kind of a disfranchisement and it is not Bayesian is false. sent2: the bromide limes game. sent3: if the bromide is not Bayesian the fact that the polyploid does not lime game but it is a Macrorhamphosidae is incorrect. sent4: The game limes bromide. sent5: the infiltrator is a kind of a stirrup if that the polyploid is not a kind of a stirrup and/or it is unfashionable is not true. sent6: the infiltrator is not a stirrup if that the polyploid is Bayesian hold. sent7: the polyploid is not a stirrup if it does not lime game and is a kind of a disfranchisement. sent8: that that the polyploid does not lime game and is a Macrorhamphosidae does not hold is not wrong if the bromide is not a disfranchisement. sent9: the infiltrator is not a kind of a stirrup if that the polyploid is not a kind of a disfranchisement and is not Bayesian is false. sent10: the bromide is not a Macrorhamphosidae. sent11: the fact that something is not unfashionable if it is not a Macrorhamphosidae and does lime game is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the bromide is not a kind of a Macrorhamphosidae and does lime game it is not unfashionable.; sent10 & sent2 -> int2: the bromide is not a kind of a Macrorhamphosidae but it limes game.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bromide is not unfashionable.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that that the polyploid is both not a disfranchisement and not Bayesian is not incorrect is not correct.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__