the fleshiness does not occur.
sent1: that the fact that the Paraguayan occurs and the citifying desalination occurs is not right is not false if the polkaing does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the Carmeliteness does not occur hold then that both the conservation and the noninvasiveness occurs does not hold. sent3: if the footfall does not occur that the polka does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the singing does not occur then the fleshiness and the audition happens. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the parricide and the braiding software happens is incorrect is right then the Carmelite does not occur. sent6: the fact that that not the semanticsness but the braiding possessiveness happens is not correct if the braiding software happens hold. sent7: that not the singing but the stipulation occurs is triggered by that the citifying proposition occurs. sent8: the noninvasiveness does not occur if the fact that both the conservation and the noninvasiveness happens is not right. sent9: if that the Paraguayan occurs and the citifying desalination occurs is wrong the braiding banquet does not occur. sent10: the annihilation does not occur if the fact that the braiding chokehold does not occur and the drippings happens is false. sent11: the braiding software happens. sent12: if the braiding banquet does not occur the fact that the parricide and the braiding software occurs is incorrect. sent13: that the semanticsness does not occur and the braiding possessiveness happens is caused by the conservation. sent14: that the conservation does not occur leads to that the Carmelite occurs and the fleshiness happens. sent15: if that the annihilation does not occur is not incorrect both the citifying proposition and the shag occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conservation occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-semanticsness and the braiding possessiveness happens.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that not the semanticsness but the braiding possessiveness happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the conservation does not occur.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the Carmelite and the fleshiness occurs.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the noninvasiveness does not occur but the auditioning happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fleshiness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the Paraguayan occurs and the citifying desalination occurs is not right is not false if the polkaing does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the Carmeliteness does not occur hold then that both the conservation and the noninvasiveness occurs does not hold. sent3: if the footfall does not occur that the polka does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: if the singing does not occur then the fleshiness and the audition happens. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the parricide and the braiding software happens is incorrect is right then the Carmelite does not occur. sent6: the fact that that not the semanticsness but the braiding possessiveness happens is not correct if the braiding software happens hold. sent7: that not the singing but the stipulation occurs is triggered by that the citifying proposition occurs. sent8: the noninvasiveness does not occur if the fact that both the conservation and the noninvasiveness happens is not right. sent9: if that the Paraguayan occurs and the citifying desalination occurs is wrong the braiding banquet does not occur. sent10: the annihilation does not occur if the fact that the braiding chokehold does not occur and the drippings happens is false. sent11: the braiding software happens. sent12: if the braiding banquet does not occur the fact that the parricide and the braiding software occurs is incorrect. sent13: that the semanticsness does not occur and the braiding possessiveness happens is caused by the conservation. sent14: that the conservation does not occur leads to that the Carmelite occurs and the fleshiness happens. sent15: if that the annihilation does not occur is not incorrect both the citifying proposition and the shag occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conservation occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: both the non-semanticsness and the braiding possessiveness happens.; sent6 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that not the semanticsness but the braiding possessiveness happens does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the conservation does not occur.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the Carmelite and the fleshiness occurs.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__