if the gurnard is not a cross-pollination that the grama is disloyal but it does refrain intermittence is false.
sent1: the gurnard is loyal. sent2: the gurnard is a anticholinergic. sent3: the bullion does refrain intermittence. sent4: the grama is a toed and a cross-pollination if there exists something such that it does not refrain timework. sent5: the grama is not loyal. sent6: the gurnard is a moorwort. sent7: something does not assemble craze and/or it is Noachian if it is tonsorial. sent8: the fact that the gurnard is not Masoretic and does assemble bullion is incorrect if the grama is a kind of a toed. sent9: the fact that the grama is loyal and it does refrain intermittence is not right. sent10: the fact that the grama is not loyal and does refrain intermittence is false if the gurnard is a kind of a cross-pollination. sent11: everything is tonsorial. sent12: if something either does not assemble craze or is Noachian or both then the licenser does not refrain timework. sent13: the gurnard is a cross-pollination if the fact that the grama is not loyal and does refrain intermittence is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grama is not loyal and refrains intermittence.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the gurnard is a kind of a cross-pollination.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the gurnard is not a cross-pollination.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the grama is not loyal but it does refrain intermittence is not true is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the gurnard is not Masoretic but it assembles bullion is not right.
sent7 -> int4: if the desk is tonsorial then it does not assemble craze and/or is Noachian.; sent11 -> int5: that the desk is tonsorial hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the desk does not assemble craze and/or it is Noachian.; int6 -> int7: everything does not assemble craze and/or is Noachian.; int7 -> int8: the bather does not assemble craze or it is Noachian or both.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that it does not assemble craze and/or it is Noachian.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the licenser does not refrain timework.; int10 -> int11: something does not refrain timework.; sent4 & int11 -> int12: the grama is a toed and it is a cross-pollination.; int12 -> int13: the grama is a toed.; sent8 & int13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the gurnard is not a cross-pollination that the grama is disloyal but it does refrain intermittence is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the gurnard is loyal. sent2: the gurnard is a anticholinergic. sent3: the bullion does refrain intermittence. sent4: the grama is a toed and a cross-pollination if there exists something such that it does not refrain timework. sent5: the grama is not loyal. sent6: the gurnard is a moorwort. sent7: something does not assemble craze and/or it is Noachian if it is tonsorial. sent8: the fact that the gurnard is not Masoretic and does assemble bullion is incorrect if the grama is a kind of a toed. sent9: the fact that the grama is loyal and it does refrain intermittence is not right. sent10: the fact that the grama is not loyal and does refrain intermittence is false if the gurnard is a kind of a cross-pollination. sent11: everything is tonsorial. sent12: if something either does not assemble craze or is Noachian or both then the licenser does not refrain timework. sent13: the gurnard is a cross-pollination if the fact that the grama is not loyal and does refrain intermittence is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the grama is not loyal and refrains intermittence.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the gurnard is a kind of a cross-pollination.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the gurnard is not a cross-pollination.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the grama is not loyal but it does refrain intermittence is not true is not incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__