the aquaticness occurs.
sent1: the stoloniferousness happens. sent2: if the stirring happens the handle happens. sent3: either the capering youth-on-age or the toothlessness or both occurs if the gap does not occur. sent4: that the handling and the thoracotomy happens brings about the non-aquaticness. sent5: that the capering Discoglossidae happens causes that the capering reservoir occurs. sent6: the fact that the oscineness does not occur and the bearing does not occur is incorrect. sent7: that the thoracotomy does not occur is prevented by that the stoloniferousness happens. sent8: if the capering sundae happens then the fact that the inorganicness does not occur and the cockfight does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the inorganicness and the stoloniferousness occurs then the thoracotomy does not occur. sent10: if the thoracotomy does not occur the fact that the capering gigabyte but not the handle occurs is not right. sent11: the gap does not occur if that the oscineness does not occur and the bearing does not occur is not correct. sent12: the bogging Chomsky is triggered by that the gait occurs. sent13: either the stirring occurs or the capering gigabyte happens or both. sent14: that the capering sundae occurs is not incorrect if the capering youth-on-age happens. sent15: the handling happens if the capering gigabyte happens. sent16: the aquaticness happens if the stirring happens. sent17: either the bogging bedbug happens or the gait happens or both. sent18: the stoloniferousness does not occur if the fact that the inorganicness does not occur and the cockfight does not occur is not right.
sent13 & sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the handle occurs.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the thoracotomy happens is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the handle happens and the thoracotomy occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the capering Pelecanus occurs.
sent11 & sent6 -> int4: the gap does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the capering youth-on-age happens and/or the toothlessness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the aquaticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the stoloniferousness happens. sent2: if the stirring happens the handle happens. sent3: either the capering youth-on-age or the toothlessness or both occurs if the gap does not occur. sent4: that the handling and the thoracotomy happens brings about the non-aquaticness. sent5: that the capering Discoglossidae happens causes that the capering reservoir occurs. sent6: the fact that the oscineness does not occur and the bearing does not occur is incorrect. sent7: that the thoracotomy does not occur is prevented by that the stoloniferousness happens. sent8: if the capering sundae happens then the fact that the inorganicness does not occur and the cockfight does not occur does not hold. sent9: if the inorganicness and the stoloniferousness occurs then the thoracotomy does not occur. sent10: if the thoracotomy does not occur the fact that the capering gigabyte but not the handle occurs is not right. sent11: the gap does not occur if that the oscineness does not occur and the bearing does not occur is not correct. sent12: the bogging Chomsky is triggered by that the gait occurs. sent13: either the stirring occurs or the capering gigabyte happens or both. sent14: that the capering sundae occurs is not incorrect if the capering youth-on-age happens. sent15: the handling happens if the capering gigabyte happens. sent16: the aquaticness happens if the stirring happens. sent17: either the bogging bedbug happens or the gait happens or both. sent18: the stoloniferousness does not occur if the fact that the inorganicness does not occur and the cockfight does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent2 & sent15 -> int1: the handle occurs.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the thoracotomy happens is not incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the handle happens and the thoracotomy occurs.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__