the emptying happens.
sent1: the arbitrariness occurs and the tweezing Oxylebius happens. sent2: that the disparagement does not occur is triggered by that the Cretaceousness occurs and the emptyingness happens. sent3: if both the tweezing Oxylebius and the concubinage happens then the sociableness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the unintelligibleness occurs but the arbitrariness does not occur is not right if the itineration does not occur. sent5: if the disparagement does not occur the sociable happens. sent6: the Cretaceousness occurs. sent7: the concubinage and the unintelligibleness happens. sent8: that the fact that both the non-emptyingness and the non-Cretaceousness happens is not wrong does not hold if the disparagement occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emptying occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the Cretaceousness and the emptyingness happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the disparagement does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the sociable happens.; sent1 -> int4: the tweezing Oxylebius happens.; sent7 -> int5: the concubinage occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tweezing Oxylebius and the concubinage occurs.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the sociableness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the emptying occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the emptying happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the arbitrariness occurs and the tweezing Oxylebius happens. sent2: that the disparagement does not occur is triggered by that the Cretaceousness occurs and the emptyingness happens. sent3: if both the tweezing Oxylebius and the concubinage happens then the sociableness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the unintelligibleness occurs but the arbitrariness does not occur is not right if the itineration does not occur. sent5: if the disparagement does not occur the sociable happens. sent6: the Cretaceousness occurs. sent7: the concubinage and the unintelligibleness happens. sent8: that the fact that both the non-emptyingness and the non-Cretaceousness happens is not wrong does not hold if the disparagement occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emptying occurs.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: both the Cretaceousness and the emptyingness happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the disparagement does not occur.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the sociable happens.; sent1 -> int4: the tweezing Oxylebius happens.; sent7 -> int5: the concubinage occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the tweezing Oxylebius and the concubinage occurs.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the sociableness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__