that the ducalness does not occur if the individuating epidiascope occurs and the individuating Sturnidae occurs is not true.
sent1: the impatientness and the ducalness occurs if the individuating Myrmidon does not occur. sent2: the patching is prevented by that the individuating epidiascope occurs and the individuating Sturnidae does not occur. sent3: that the individuating epidiascope happens causes that both the impatientness and the non-ducalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the individuating epidiascope and the individuating Sturnidae occurs.; assump1 -> int1: that the individuating epidiascope happens is not wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the impatientness and the non-ducalness happens.; int2 -> int3: the ducalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the patching does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the ducalness does not occur if the individuating epidiascope occurs and the individuating Sturnidae occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the impatientness and the ducalness occurs if the individuating Myrmidon does not occur. sent2: the patching is prevented by that the individuating epidiascope occurs and the individuating Sturnidae does not occur. sent3: that the individuating epidiascope happens causes that both the impatientness and the non-ducalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the individuating epidiascope and the individuating Sturnidae occurs.; assump1 -> int1: that the individuating epidiascope happens is not wrong.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the impatientness and the non-ducalness happens.; int2 -> int3: the ducalness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__