that the Honduran is non-cannibalistic and daisylike is not right.
sent1: the fact that something is not cannibalistic and is daisylike is wrong if it is a chatter. sent2: the fact that something is a freedom is true if the fact that it is a chatter and is not daisylike is wrong. sent3: the wingback is not anemometric and is daisylike if the nail is not daisylike. sent4: something that is not a fucker either is anemometric or is not a cuppa or both. sent5: that the Honduran is not a saguaro and it is not a freedom is not true if the wingback is anemometric. sent6: if the wingback is not daisylike then the Honduran is both non-cannibalistic and not daisylike. sent7: the nail is not perithelial. sent8: if something is not a saguaro and is anemometric then it is a freedom. sent9: if the nail is not perithelial it is not a fucker and is a kind of a variable. sent10: if a chatter is daisylike then the nail is not a freedom. sent11: the nail is not a saguaro and is anemometric. sent12: the wingback is a kind of a chatter. sent13: the fact that something does chatter and is not daisylike does not hold if it is a kind of a saguaro.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wingback is daisylike.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the wingback is a chatter that is daisylike.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a chatter that is daisylike.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the nail is not a kind of a freedom.; sent8 -> int4: the nail is a freedom if it is not a kind of a saguaro and it is not non-anemometric.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the nail is a freedom.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the wingback is not daisylike.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the wingback is a freedom.
sent2 -> int8: that the wingback is a freedom hold if that that it does chatter and it is not daisylike is not incorrect is not right.; sent13 -> int9: the fact that the wingback is a chatter and not daisylike is not true if it is a saguaro.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Honduran is non-cannibalistic and daisylike is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not cannibalistic and is daisylike is wrong if it is a chatter. sent2: the fact that something is a freedom is true if the fact that it is a chatter and is not daisylike is wrong. sent3: the wingback is not anemometric and is daisylike if the nail is not daisylike. sent4: something that is not a fucker either is anemometric or is not a cuppa or both. sent5: that the Honduran is not a saguaro and it is not a freedom is not true if the wingback is anemometric. sent6: if the wingback is not daisylike then the Honduran is both non-cannibalistic and not daisylike. sent7: the nail is not perithelial. sent8: if something is not a saguaro and is anemometric then it is a freedom. sent9: if the nail is not perithelial it is not a fucker and is a kind of a variable. sent10: if a chatter is daisylike then the nail is not a freedom. sent11: the nail is not a saguaro and is anemometric. sent12: the wingback is a kind of a chatter. sent13: the fact that something does chatter and is not daisylike does not hold if it is a kind of a saguaro. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wingback is daisylike.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the wingback is a chatter that is daisylike.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a chatter that is daisylike.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the nail is not a kind of a freedom.; sent8 -> int4: the nail is a freedom if it is not a kind of a saguaro and it is not non-anemometric.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the nail is a freedom.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the wingback is not daisylike.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__