the fact that if the grouping ridicule happens the trustfulness happens is not right.
sent1: that the blood does not occur is prevented by that both the non-arbitralness and the cooling happens. sent2: the non-unintelligentness and the desecrating buspirone happens. sent3: both the sow and the debarring Torpedinidae happens. sent4: the debarring profiterole does not occur but the hatefulness occurs. sent5: that if that the grouping ridicule does not occur and the uvularness happens is not true then the trustfulness happens hold. sent6: that the tourism does not occur is prevented by that the irresoluteness does not occur but the radioing occurs. sent7: that not the desecrating blastula but the desecrating Lasso happens triggers that the katharobicness happens. sent8: the real is brought about by the debarring exchanged. sent9: that not the subsonicness but the camping happens is not right. sent10: the hemisphericness occurs if that the camping does not occur but the defervescence occurs does not hold. sent11: the fact that the lacrimalness happens is not incorrect. sent12: the shapeliness occurs. sent13: that the trustfulness does not occur is prevented by that not the grouping ridicule but the uvularness occurs. sent14: the hemisphericness occurs and the camping happens. sent15: that the sarcosomalness occurs is not incorrect if the ctenoidness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the grouping ridicule but the uvularness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the grouping ridicule does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the grouping ridicule happens hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the grouping ridicule does not occur but the uvularness happens hold does not hold.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the trustfulness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the grouping ridicule happens the trustfulness happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the blood does not occur is prevented by that both the non-arbitralness and the cooling happens. sent2: the non-unintelligentness and the desecrating buspirone happens. sent3: both the sow and the debarring Torpedinidae happens. sent4: the debarring profiterole does not occur but the hatefulness occurs. sent5: that if that the grouping ridicule does not occur and the uvularness happens is not true then the trustfulness happens hold. sent6: that the tourism does not occur is prevented by that the irresoluteness does not occur but the radioing occurs. sent7: that not the desecrating blastula but the desecrating Lasso happens triggers that the katharobicness happens. sent8: the real is brought about by the debarring exchanged. sent9: that not the subsonicness but the camping happens is not right. sent10: the hemisphericness occurs if that the camping does not occur but the defervescence occurs does not hold. sent11: the fact that the lacrimalness happens is not incorrect. sent12: the shapeliness occurs. sent13: that the trustfulness does not occur is prevented by that not the grouping ridicule but the uvularness occurs. sent14: the hemisphericness occurs and the camping happens. sent15: that the sarcosomalness occurs is not incorrect if the ctenoidness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the grouping ridicule but the uvularness happens.; assump2 -> int1: the grouping ridicule does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the grouping ridicule happens hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the fact that the grouping ridicule does not occur but the uvularness happens hold does not hold.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the trustfulness happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__