that if the plier accelerates slingback then the fact that the microbiologist is a rouged but not a depopulation is not true is not correct.
sent1: the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic if the fact that the plier is both a Spica and not a depopulation does not hold. sent2: the plier does not rouge and it is not sadomasochistic if something is not trinucleate. sent3: the plier is both not a block and a Spica if it does accelerate slingback. sent4: that the microbiologist is both a rouged and not a depopulation hold if the plier does accelerate slingback. sent5: the microbiologist is a kind of sadomasochistic thing that is trinucleate if the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic. sent6: if the microbiologist is a block the plier is not a depopulation. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a depopulation and/or is not trinucleate the ideologist is not trinucleate. sent8: the fact that that something is a rouged but it is not a depopulation does not hold if it is sadomasochistic hold. sent9: if the plier is not a block the fact that the ideologist radios but it is not a aye-aye does not hold. sent10: if something blocks then that it is trinucleate and sadomasochistic is not right. sent11: the microbiologist is trinucleate. sent12: that the ideologist is a kind of a rouged and is not a aye-aye is not correct if the microbiologist is not a depopulation. sent13: the microbiologist is trinucleate if the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic. sent14: something that is not a rouged and is not sadomasochistic is not a aye-aye. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is not a depopulation and/or it is not trinucleate is not wrong. sent16: the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic if that that the ideologist radios but it is not a aye-aye is not wrong is false. sent17: something is not a block if it does not accelerate slingback. sent18: if the plier is not a block then the fact that the ideologist is a kind of a radio and it is a aye-aye is not right. sent19: if the plier is not a rouged the microbiologist is a rouged and it does accelerate slingback. sent20: the fact that something radios and it accelerates slingback is incorrect if it is not a aye-aye.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plier accelerates slingback.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the plier is not a block but it is a Spica.; int1 -> int2: the plier is not a block.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the ideologist is both radio and not a aye-aye does not hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the microbiologist is sadomasochistic and it is trinucleate hold.; int5 -> int6: the microbiologist is sadomasochistic.; sent8 -> int7: that the microbiologist rouges but it is not a depopulation does not hold if it is sadomasochistic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the microbiologist is a rouged but it is not a kind of a depopulation does not hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the microbiologist is not a block.
sent17 -> int9: if the microbiologist does not accelerate slingback it is not a block.; sent20 -> int10: if the plier is not a aye-aye then the fact that it is a kind of radio thing that does accelerate slingback is not correct.; sent14 -> int11: the plier is not a aye-aye if it is not a kind of a rouged and is non-sadomasochistic.; sent15 & sent7 -> int12: the ideologist is not trinucleate.; int12 -> int13: there are non-trinucleate things.; int13 & sent2 -> int14: the plier is not a rouged and it is not sadomasochistic.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the plier is not a aye-aye.; int10 & int15 -> int16: that the plier does radio and it accelerates slingback is incorrect.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that that it is a radio that accelerates slingback is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the plier accelerates slingback then the fact that the microbiologist is a rouged but not a depopulation is not true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic if the fact that the plier is both a Spica and not a depopulation does not hold. sent2: the plier does not rouge and it is not sadomasochistic if something is not trinucleate. sent3: the plier is both not a block and a Spica if it does accelerate slingback. sent4: that the microbiologist is both a rouged and not a depopulation hold if the plier does accelerate slingback. sent5: the microbiologist is a kind of sadomasochistic thing that is trinucleate if the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic. sent6: if the microbiologist is a block the plier is not a depopulation. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a depopulation and/or is not trinucleate the ideologist is not trinucleate. sent8: the fact that that something is a rouged but it is not a depopulation does not hold if it is sadomasochistic hold. sent9: if the plier is not a block the fact that the ideologist radios but it is not a aye-aye does not hold. sent10: if something blocks then that it is trinucleate and sadomasochistic is not right. sent11: the microbiologist is trinucleate. sent12: that the ideologist is a kind of a rouged and is not a aye-aye is not correct if the microbiologist is not a depopulation. sent13: the microbiologist is trinucleate if the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic. sent14: something that is not a rouged and is not sadomasochistic is not a aye-aye. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is not a depopulation and/or it is not trinucleate is not wrong. sent16: the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic if that that the ideologist radios but it is not a aye-aye is not wrong is false. sent17: something is not a block if it does not accelerate slingback. sent18: if the plier is not a block then the fact that the ideologist is a kind of a radio and it is a aye-aye is not right. sent19: if the plier is not a rouged the microbiologist is a rouged and it does accelerate slingback. sent20: the fact that something radios and it accelerates slingback is incorrect if it is not a aye-aye. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plier accelerates slingback.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the plier is not a block but it is a Spica.; int1 -> int2: the plier is not a block.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the ideologist is both radio and not a aye-aye does not hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the isosorbide is not sadomasochistic.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the microbiologist is sadomasochistic and it is trinucleate hold.; int5 -> int6: the microbiologist is sadomasochistic.; sent8 -> int7: that the microbiologist rouges but it is not a depopulation does not hold if it is sadomasochistic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the microbiologist is a rouged but it is not a kind of a depopulation does not hold.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__