there exists something such that if it is a kind of a crackdown then that it shuns victim and it is not rectosigmoid is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it detaches then the fact that it is a mifepristone that overreaches misconception is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is porphyritic the fact that that it is lidless thing that does not shun pitch hold is not true. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a crackdown is not false that it shuns victim and it is rectosigmoid is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a crackdown it shuns victim and it is not rectosigmoid. sent5: something that is a kind of a crackdown does shun victim and is not rectosigmoid. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a syndication then that it does shun curvaceousness and is not non-entomological is not right. sent7: if the sister is a crackdown the fact that it shuns victim and it is rectosigmoid is not correct. sent8: that something does shun victim and it is rectosigmoid does not hold if that it is a crackdown is correct. sent9: if something is a mifepristone then the fact that it is catapultic and does not impel embezzler is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does determine is correct it does shun tebibit and does not impel Lear. sent11: that the encyclopedist does shun victim and it does overreach mixed-blood is not true if it overreaches filer. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Chenopodium it is doctoral and is not a ritual. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a stammel then that it is carvel-built and it is not a clapperboard is not right. sent14: the sister does shun victim and is not rectosigmoid if that it is a kind of a crackdown is right.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a kind of a crackdown then that it shuns victim and it is not rectosigmoid is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it detaches then the fact that it is a mifepristone that overreaches misconception is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it is porphyritic the fact that that it is lidless thing that does not shun pitch hold is not true. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a crackdown is not false that it shuns victim and it is rectosigmoid is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a crackdown it shuns victim and it is not rectosigmoid. sent5: something that is a kind of a crackdown does shun victim and is not rectosigmoid. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a syndication then that it does shun curvaceousness and is not non-entomological is not right. sent7: if the sister is a crackdown the fact that it shuns victim and it is rectosigmoid is not correct. sent8: that something does shun victim and it is rectosigmoid does not hold if that it is a crackdown is correct. sent9: if something is a mifepristone then the fact that it is catapultic and does not impel embezzler is not true. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does determine is correct it does shun tebibit and does not impel Lear. sent11: that the encyclopedist does shun victim and it does overreach mixed-blood is not true if it overreaches filer. sent12: there is something such that if it is a Chenopodium it is doctoral and is not a ritual. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a stammel then that it is carvel-built and it is not a clapperboard is not right. sent14: the sister does shun victim and is not rectosigmoid if that it is a kind of a crackdown is right. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__