the creator is not undatable.
sent1: the fact that the Mexican is not a kind of a trainload and does not cozen haunch is not correct if the challis cozen haunch. sent2: the agora is not a jaundiced and it is not a lechwe. sent3: the shampoo is indehiscent. sent4: if the challis is not a kind of a jaundiced either the shampoo does not cozen haunch or it jaundiced or both. sent5: if the challis is not a kind of a trainload then the Mexican is not a funambulist and/or it is a trainload. sent6: the shampoo does cozen haunch and/or it is not a lechwe. sent7: that the challis does cozen haunch is not false if it is a trainload. sent8: if the shampoo is a missal it jaundices. sent9: the Mexican is not a missal. sent10: the agora does not rear Colombo and is not a jaundiced. sent11: the shampoo does not cozen haunch and/or is not a lechwe if the fact that the challis does cozen haunch is true. sent12: the shampoo rears Colombo if it cozens haunch. sent13: the creator is not undatable if the Mexican is not a funambulist and/or it is a kind of a trainload. sent14: if something does not cozen haunch or it is not a lechwe or both then it is a missal. sent15: that the Mexican does not cozen arrogator and is a kind of a lechwe is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the challis is a trainload.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the challis does cozen haunch.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: either the shampoo does not cozen haunch or it is not a lechwe or both.; sent14 -> int3: if the shampoo does not cozen haunch or it is not a lechwe or both then it is a kind of a missal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the shampoo is a missal.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the shampoo jaundices.;
$hypothesis$ = the creator is not undatable. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Mexican is not a kind of a trainload and does not cozen haunch is not correct if the challis cozen haunch. sent2: the agora is not a jaundiced and it is not a lechwe. sent3: the shampoo is indehiscent. sent4: if the challis is not a kind of a jaundiced either the shampoo does not cozen haunch or it jaundiced or both. sent5: if the challis is not a kind of a trainload then the Mexican is not a funambulist and/or it is a trainload. sent6: the shampoo does cozen haunch and/or it is not a lechwe. sent7: that the challis does cozen haunch is not false if it is a trainload. sent8: if the shampoo is a missal it jaundices. sent9: the Mexican is not a missal. sent10: the agora does not rear Colombo and is not a jaundiced. sent11: the shampoo does not cozen haunch and/or is not a lechwe if the fact that the challis does cozen haunch is true. sent12: the shampoo rears Colombo if it cozens haunch. sent13: the creator is not undatable if the Mexican is not a funambulist and/or it is a kind of a trainload. sent14: if something does not cozen haunch or it is not a lechwe or both then it is a missal. sent15: that the Mexican does not cozen arrogator and is a kind of a lechwe is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the challis is a trainload.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the challis does cozen haunch.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: either the shampoo does not cozen haunch or it is not a lechwe or both.; sent14 -> int3: if the shampoo does not cozen haunch or it is not a lechwe or both then it is a kind of a missal.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the shampoo is a missal.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the shampoo jaundices.; __UNKNOWN__