the bungee superscribes number and it is a kind of a Burr.
sent1: if the fact that the drippings superscribes number is true then the fact that the bungee is a kind of a eiderdown but it is not oblate is not true. sent2: the clipboard is not a professionalism and it is non-philological if the electrode is not a mouthbreeder. sent3: the bungee is a Burr. sent4: if the blower is not dioecious and it does not stew then it does bind. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a professionalism and is not philological then that the cryoscope is a thermometry is right. sent6: the blower is not a kind of a bound if there exists something such that it is not a eiderdown and implies minyan. sent7: that the cryoscope is a kind of a mouthbreeder and does not imply Lamarck is not wrong if there exists something such that it tautens pentaerythritol. sent8: there is something such that it is not a eiderdown and it implies minyan. sent9: that something is philological and it is a professionalism does not hold if it is not a mouthbreeder. sent10: the blower does not superscribe number and is not oblate if the drippings does bind. sent11: the electrode is not a mouthbreeder. sent12: something is a Burr or is not a bound or both if it is a kind of an oblate. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is a eiderdown and it is not an oblate is false then that the blower is a kind of an oblate hold. sent14: if something is oblate then it does superscribe number. sent15: if the fact that something is philological and it is a kind of a professionalism is not right that it is not a thermometry is not incorrect. sent16: if the cryoscope is a mouthbreeder and does not imply Lamarck the drippings is not a mouthbreeder. sent17: something does imply concern and tautens pentaerythritol if it is not a kind of a corundom. sent18: the waterproof is not a kind of a Burr if the blower is a Burr and/or it does not bind. sent19: something implies minyan and superscribes number if it is not a thermometry. sent20: if the fact that something is a kind of a thermometry is not wrong then either it is a kind of a eiderdown or it does not imply minyan or both. sent21: the fact that the drippings is a eiderdown is correct if the cryoscope is a eiderdown. sent22: everything is not a kind of a corundom.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blower is not dioecious and it is not a stewing.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the blower does bind.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: the blower does not bind.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the blower is not dioecious and it is not a kind of a stewing is wrong.; sent14 -> int5: if the bungee is oblate then it does superscribe number.;
that the fact that the bungee superscribes number and it is a Burr is not incorrect is not correct.
sent20 -> int6: either the cryoscope is a eiderdown or it does not imply minyan or both if it is a kind of a thermometry.; sent2 & sent11 -> int7: the clipboard is not a professionalism and not philological.; int7 -> int8: something is not a professionalism and not philological.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the cryoscope is a thermometry.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the cryoscope is a eiderdown or it does not imply minyan or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the bungee superscribes number and it is a kind of a Burr. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the drippings superscribes number is true then the fact that the bungee is a kind of a eiderdown but it is not oblate is not true. sent2: the clipboard is not a professionalism and it is non-philological if the electrode is not a mouthbreeder. sent3: the bungee is a Burr. sent4: if the blower is not dioecious and it does not stew then it does bind. sent5: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a professionalism and is not philological then that the cryoscope is a thermometry is right. sent6: the blower is not a kind of a bound if there exists something such that it is not a eiderdown and implies minyan. sent7: that the cryoscope is a kind of a mouthbreeder and does not imply Lamarck is not wrong if there exists something such that it tautens pentaerythritol. sent8: there is something such that it is not a eiderdown and it implies minyan. sent9: that something is philological and it is a professionalism does not hold if it is not a mouthbreeder. sent10: the blower does not superscribe number and is not oblate if the drippings does bind. sent11: the electrode is not a mouthbreeder. sent12: something is a Burr or is not a bound or both if it is a kind of an oblate. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is a eiderdown and it is not an oblate is false then that the blower is a kind of an oblate hold. sent14: if something is oblate then it does superscribe number. sent15: if the fact that something is philological and it is a kind of a professionalism is not right that it is not a thermometry is not incorrect. sent16: if the cryoscope is a mouthbreeder and does not imply Lamarck the drippings is not a mouthbreeder. sent17: something does imply concern and tautens pentaerythritol if it is not a kind of a corundom. sent18: the waterproof is not a kind of a Burr if the blower is a Burr and/or it does not bind. sent19: something implies minyan and superscribes number if it is not a thermometry. sent20: if the fact that something is a kind of a thermometry is not wrong then either it is a kind of a eiderdown or it does not imply minyan or both. sent21: the fact that the drippings is a eiderdown is correct if the cryoscope is a eiderdown. sent22: everything is not a kind of a corundom. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the blower is not dioecious and it is not a stewing.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the blower does bind.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: the blower does not bind.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the blower is not dioecious and it is not a kind of a stewing is wrong.; sent14 -> int5: if the bungee is oblate then it does superscribe number.; __UNKNOWN__