there is something such that the fact that it does not associate and is integumentary is incorrect.
sent1: if the six-spot is integumentary the fact that it does not anneal and is abyssal is not right. sent2: the statesman is a kind of a Corvus if it is integumentary. sent3: if the mara is not adnate it is a kind of non-ossiferous thing that is not a Corvus. sent4: the mara is integumentary. sent5: the fact that the six-spot is not a Corvus but it associates is not right. sent6: the six-spot is glorious. sent7: the spouter does not suborn effortlessness if it is not chirpy. sent8: that the six-spot is not integumentary but it is a Corvus is false. sent9: the mara does not associate and is not a Corvus if it is not integumentary. sent10: that the six-spot is an associate and adnate does not hold. sent11: the mara does not ban tempera. sent12: something is not an associate but it is glorious. sent13: if there is something such that it is not resistless that the six-spot is not an associate and is integumentary does not hold. sent14: if the mara is not resistless then it does not associate. sent15: there is something such that it is glorious. sent16: that the mara is a kind of non-ossiferous thing that is not a Corvus does not hold if it is glorious. sent17: the earplug is not adnate. sent18: the fact that the mara is adnate and it is an associate is incorrect if something is resistible. sent19: that the mara is not adnate is right. sent20: the mara does not suborn pawpaw. sent21: the mara is topping. sent22: that the mara is not glorious and it is not a Corvus does not hold if it is an associate. sent23: that the mara is ossiferous but it is not a Corvus is not correct if it is glorious.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mara is resistless.; sent3 & sent19 -> int1: the mara is a kind of non-ossiferous thing that is not a Corvus.;
the fact that the statesman is not non-ossiferous is true.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it does not associate and is integumentary is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the six-spot is integumentary the fact that it does not anneal and is abyssal is not right. sent2: the statesman is a kind of a Corvus if it is integumentary. sent3: if the mara is not adnate it is a kind of non-ossiferous thing that is not a Corvus. sent4: the mara is integumentary. sent5: the fact that the six-spot is not a Corvus but it associates is not right. sent6: the six-spot is glorious. sent7: the spouter does not suborn effortlessness if it is not chirpy. sent8: that the six-spot is not integumentary but it is a Corvus is false. sent9: the mara does not associate and is not a Corvus if it is not integumentary. sent10: that the six-spot is an associate and adnate does not hold. sent11: the mara does not ban tempera. sent12: something is not an associate but it is glorious. sent13: if there is something such that it is not resistless that the six-spot is not an associate and is integumentary does not hold. sent14: if the mara is not resistless then it does not associate. sent15: there is something such that it is glorious. sent16: that the mara is a kind of non-ossiferous thing that is not a Corvus does not hold if it is glorious. sent17: the earplug is not adnate. sent18: the fact that the mara is adnate and it is an associate is incorrect if something is resistible. sent19: that the mara is not adnate is right. sent20: the mara does not suborn pawpaw. sent21: the mara is topping. sent22: that the mara is not glorious and it is not a Corvus does not hold if it is an associate. sent23: that the mara is ossiferous but it is not a Corvus is not correct if it is glorious. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mara is resistless.; sent3 & sent19 -> int1: the mara is a kind of non-ossiferous thing that is not a Corvus.; __UNKNOWN__