that the emasculation does not occur results in that the fabricating Mexico and the protrusion occurs.
sent1: if the fact that the emasculation occurs is right then not the caption but the deposit happens. sent2: the depositing happens. sent3: the protrusion is brought about by the non-mayoralness. sent4: the diffusing occurs. sent5: that the fabricating barbell occurs is brought about by that the paraphrase does not occur. sent6: if the emasculation does not occur then the captioning does not occur but the depositing happens. sent7: the whiting occurs and the lumbarness occurs. sent8: that the ringer does not occur but the cohesion occurs is caused by the non-Neapolitanness. sent9: the mayoralness does not occur if the pawn occurs. sent10: the impressionisticness is brought about by that the Spam occurs. sent11: the pawn happens if the whiting occurs. sent12: the non-anisometropicness is caused by that the emasculation occurs. sent13: the depositing occurs if the emasculation does not occur. sent14: the Spam happens. sent15: the fact that the lumbarness does not occur is incorrect. sent16: the fabricating Mexico occurs and the protrusion occurs if the emasculation happens. sent17: the fact that the shame happens is right. sent18: that the antagonisticness occurs hold if the non-carcinogenicness and the demineralizing guzzler occurs. sent19: the fabricating Mexico is caused by that the biblioticness occurs. sent20: the retrieval prevents that the biblioticness does not occur. sent21: the grits occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emasculation does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the caption does not occur but the deposit occurs.; sent7 -> int2: the whiting happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the pawning occurs is not wrong.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the mayoralness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the protrusion occurs.;
the anisometropicness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the emasculation does not occur results in that the fabricating Mexico and the protrusion occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the emasculation occurs is right then not the caption but the deposit happens. sent2: the depositing happens. sent3: the protrusion is brought about by the non-mayoralness. sent4: the diffusing occurs. sent5: that the fabricating barbell occurs is brought about by that the paraphrase does not occur. sent6: if the emasculation does not occur then the captioning does not occur but the depositing happens. sent7: the whiting occurs and the lumbarness occurs. sent8: that the ringer does not occur but the cohesion occurs is caused by the non-Neapolitanness. sent9: the mayoralness does not occur if the pawn occurs. sent10: the impressionisticness is brought about by that the Spam occurs. sent11: the pawn happens if the whiting occurs. sent12: the non-anisometropicness is caused by that the emasculation occurs. sent13: the depositing occurs if the emasculation does not occur. sent14: the Spam happens. sent15: the fact that the lumbarness does not occur is incorrect. sent16: the fabricating Mexico occurs and the protrusion occurs if the emasculation happens. sent17: the fact that the shame happens is right. sent18: that the antagonisticness occurs hold if the non-carcinogenicness and the demineralizing guzzler occurs. sent19: the fabricating Mexico is caused by that the biblioticness occurs. sent20: the retrieval prevents that the biblioticness does not occur. sent21: the grits occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the emasculation does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the caption does not occur but the deposit occurs.; sent7 -> int2: the whiting happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: that the pawning occurs is not wrong.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the mayoralness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the protrusion occurs.; __UNKNOWN__