the fact that the adolescent is not denominational is not incorrect.
sent1: if the adolescent is not denominational and/or it is a Spanish it does not harden unmindfulness. sent2: if the fact that the baguet is not landless hold the fact that the cynic is not phonics but it is a Spanish is not true. sent3: if that something is a Pygopus or it is not a kind of a scapular or both is not correct then it does not harden unmindfulness. sent4: if that the baguet does not harden unmindfulness is true the adolescent is denominational and it is landless. sent5: something does harden zoom and is gravitational if it is not inscriptive. sent6: the sunchoke does not harden unmindfulness if that the cynic is not phonics and not non-Spanish is incorrect. sent7: if either the adolescent is not scapular or it hardens unmindfulness or both then that it is not denominational is correct. sent8: the baguet is not inscriptive if it is soteriological. sent9: the adolescent is not scapular and/or hardens unmindfulness if the sunchoke does not hardens unmindfulness. sent10: if the cynic is not a Spanish then the sunchoke does not harden unmindfulness. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a Pygopus and/or is not a kind of a scapular is wrong if it does harden zoom.
the adolescent is denominational.
sent3 -> int1: the baguet does not harden unmindfulness if that the fact that it is a Pygopus and/or it is not a scapular is right is not correct.; sent11 -> int2: the fact that the baguet is a Pygopus and/or not scapular is incorrect if it hardens zoom.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the baguet is not inscriptive is not wrong then it does harden zoom and it is gravitational.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the adolescent is not denominational is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the adolescent is not denominational and/or it is a Spanish it does not harden unmindfulness. sent2: if the fact that the baguet is not landless hold the fact that the cynic is not phonics but it is a Spanish is not true. sent3: if that something is a Pygopus or it is not a kind of a scapular or both is not correct then it does not harden unmindfulness. sent4: if that the baguet does not harden unmindfulness is true the adolescent is denominational and it is landless. sent5: something does harden zoom and is gravitational if it is not inscriptive. sent6: the sunchoke does not harden unmindfulness if that the cynic is not phonics and not non-Spanish is incorrect. sent7: if either the adolescent is not scapular or it hardens unmindfulness or both then that it is not denominational is correct. sent8: the baguet is not inscriptive if it is soteriological. sent9: the adolescent is not scapular and/or hardens unmindfulness if the sunchoke does not hardens unmindfulness. sent10: if the cynic is not a Spanish then the sunchoke does not harden unmindfulness. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a Pygopus and/or is not a kind of a scapular is wrong if it does harden zoom. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__