the python is algolagnic.
sent1: the tamp is not a ichthyologist if there is something such that it is not a kind of a ichthyologist. sent2: the aisle is not a Ute if there exists something such that that it is marly and it is not bolographic does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a ichthyologist and it does housekeep signaler does not hold. sent4: the cheesecake is a kind of an agnostic if the fact that the cattleship is inhalant but it is not a Ute is not correct. sent5: if the palfrey is non-interstitial thing that does not droop the python is not non-algolagnic. sent6: there exists something such that that it is algolagnic and is bolographic is not true. sent7: the python does not prod colonizer. sent8: something is a kind of non-pompous thing that is non-seminiferous if it is not a ichthyologist. sent9: the cheesecake does not prod colonizer if it is not pompous and not seminiferous. sent10: the ND is not seminiferous. sent11: something prods colonizer if it is agnostic. sent12: if the aisle is not a Ute then that the cattleship is inhalant but it is not a Ute does not hold. sent13: if there is something such that that it is a ichthyologist and it does housekeep signaler does not hold the cheesecake is not a ichthyologist. sent14: if the cattleship is an agnostic but not a Ute the cheesecake is a ichthyologist. sent15: if the ND relaces palfrey the palfrey is not interstitial and it does not droop. sent16: if the cattleship is not an inhalant then the fact that the cheesecake is a kind of a ichthyologist but it is not an inhalant is not correct. sent17: the tamp does not relace palfrey.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the tamp is marly and is not bolographic is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of marly thing that is not bolographic is not true.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the aisle is not a Ute.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the cattleship is an inhalant but it is not a Ute does not hold.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the cheesecake is an agnostic.; sent11 -> int5: if the cheesecake is agnostic it does prod colonizer.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the cheesecake does prod colonizer.; sent8 -> int7: the cheesecake is both not pompous and not seminiferous if it is not a ichthyologist.; sent3 & sent13 -> int8: the cheesecake is not a ichthyologist.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the cheesecake is not pompous and it is not seminiferous.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the cheesecake does not prod colonizer.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the tamp is marly but not bolographic.;
$hypothesis$ = the python is algolagnic. ; $context$ = sent1: the tamp is not a ichthyologist if there is something such that it is not a kind of a ichthyologist. sent2: the aisle is not a Ute if there exists something such that that it is marly and it is not bolographic does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a ichthyologist and it does housekeep signaler does not hold. sent4: the cheesecake is a kind of an agnostic if the fact that the cattleship is inhalant but it is not a Ute is not correct. sent5: if the palfrey is non-interstitial thing that does not droop the python is not non-algolagnic. sent6: there exists something such that that it is algolagnic and is bolographic is not true. sent7: the python does not prod colonizer. sent8: something is a kind of non-pompous thing that is non-seminiferous if it is not a ichthyologist. sent9: the cheesecake does not prod colonizer if it is not pompous and not seminiferous. sent10: the ND is not seminiferous. sent11: something prods colonizer if it is agnostic. sent12: if the aisle is not a Ute then that the cattleship is inhalant but it is not a Ute does not hold. sent13: if there is something such that that it is a ichthyologist and it does housekeep signaler does not hold the cheesecake is not a ichthyologist. sent14: if the cattleship is an agnostic but not a Ute the cheesecake is a ichthyologist. sent15: if the ND relaces palfrey the palfrey is not interstitial and it does not droop. sent16: if the cattleship is not an inhalant then the fact that the cheesecake is a kind of a ichthyologist but it is not an inhalant is not correct. sent17: the tamp does not relace palfrey. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the tamp is marly and is not bolographic is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is a kind of marly thing that is not bolographic is not true.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the aisle is not a Ute.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the fact that the cattleship is an inhalant but it is not a Ute does not hold.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the cheesecake is an agnostic.; sent11 -> int5: if the cheesecake is agnostic it does prod colonizer.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the cheesecake does prod colonizer.; sent8 -> int7: the cheesecake is both not pompous and not seminiferous if it is not a ichthyologist.; sent3 & sent13 -> int8: the cheesecake is not a ichthyologist.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the cheesecake is not pompous and it is not seminiferous.; sent9 & int9 -> int10: the cheesecake does not prod colonizer.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the tamp is marly but not bolographic.; __UNKNOWN__