the fact that that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not upland is correct it does deserve cinchona is not wrong is not correct.
sent1: the charnel is upland if it does not strangulate canvas. sent2: there is something such that if it is a cockscomb then it does deserve charnel. sent3: if something is not upland then it does deserve cinchona. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not concord it is ambulatory. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not stative then it symmetrizes. sent6: that the cinchona is upland is not incorrect if it is a tapotement. sent7: if the cinchona is not an interview it is upland. sent8: there is something such that if it is not stative then it is a realty. sent9: there exists something such that if it is journalistic it is a scattering. sent10: if something is upland then it does deserve cinchona. sent11: there is something such that if it does not concord then it strangulates jellyfish. sent12: if the cinchona is not upland then it is timid. sent13: the cinchona does deserve cinchona if it is upland. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is upland is true then it does deserve cinchona. sent15: if something is immature it is an inside. sent16: if the fact that the instrumentation is not upland is not incorrect it is a subscript. sent17: there exists something such that if it does not resist chatterbox it is a Isuridae. sent18: the fact that the cinchona is upland hold if it is not a homegirl. sent19: a hatless thing does deserve Spark. sent20: that something does strangulate saucepot if it is not a viewgraph is right. sent21: if the restharrow does not deserve cinchona that it is nonviolent is not false.
sent3 -> int1: if the cinchona is not upland it deserves cinchona.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not upland is correct it does deserve cinchona is not wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the charnel is upland if it does not strangulate canvas. sent2: there is something such that if it is a cockscomb then it does deserve charnel. sent3: if something is not upland then it does deserve cinchona. sent4: there exists something such that if it does not concord it is ambulatory. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not stative then it symmetrizes. sent6: that the cinchona is upland is not incorrect if it is a tapotement. sent7: if the cinchona is not an interview it is upland. sent8: there is something such that if it is not stative then it is a realty. sent9: there exists something such that if it is journalistic it is a scattering. sent10: if something is upland then it does deserve cinchona. sent11: there is something such that if it does not concord then it strangulates jellyfish. sent12: if the cinchona is not upland then it is timid. sent13: the cinchona does deserve cinchona if it is upland. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is upland is true then it does deserve cinchona. sent15: if something is immature it is an inside. sent16: if the fact that the instrumentation is not upland is not incorrect it is a subscript. sent17: there exists something such that if it does not resist chatterbox it is a Isuridae. sent18: the fact that the cinchona is upland hold if it is not a homegirl. sent19: a hatless thing does deserve Spark. sent20: that something does strangulate saucepot if it is not a viewgraph is right. sent21: if the restharrow does not deserve cinchona that it is nonviolent is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the cinchona is not upland it deserves cinchona.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__