the worrier is a slacker if the Pilgrim is a Tunisian.
sent1: if the breadwinner is not crustal the Sivapithecus is not a bracer and is not diluvian. sent2: that the implantation is not an inevitability if the fact that the mallow does not batch easement but it is a kind of a skidder is not right is not false. sent3: something is not a triazolam if the fact that it is both not non-spatiotemporal and a rounders is not true. sent4: the worrier is a Tunisian if that the Pilgrim is a kind of a slacker is not false. sent5: if that the holly does not tack but it is postmenopausal is not true then the breadwinner is not crustal. sent6: if the Pilgrim is not a zarf then the implantation is a Tunisian and it is a kind of an inevitability. sent7: the worrier is a slacker if the Dalmatian is a zarf. sent8: the Dalmatian is not an inevitability or a separate or both if that the implantation is not an inevitability is not incorrect. sent9: the worrier is a chiropractor if the MArch is a kind of a chiropractor. sent10: if something is not a kind of an inevitability and/or it is a separate it is a zarf. sent11: the mallow is not an inevitability if the Dalmatian is a kind of a skidder. sent12: the fact that the mallow batches easement and it is a kind of a skidder does not hold. sent13: if the mallow does not separate the Pilgrim is not a zarf. sent14: the torero is esophageal if the Sivapithecus is not a kind of a bracer and it is not diluvian. sent15: if the Pilgrim is a kind of a Tunisian the fact that the mallow does not batch easement but it is a skidder does not hold. sent16: the Dalmatian is a slacker if the worrier is a chiropractor. sent17: the fact that the benedick is spatiotemporal and it is a rounders is not true. sent18: if the Dalmatian batches easement the fact that the mallow is not a kind of an inevitability and is a kind of a skidder is not right. sent19: the MArch is a chiropractor if the fact that the torero is esophageal hold. sent20: the fact that the worrier is not a slacker but a skidder is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Pilgrim is a Tunisian.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that that the mallow does not batch easement but it is a skidder is wrong is not wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the implantation is not a kind of an inevitability.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Dalmatian is not a kind of an inevitability and/or it is a separate.; sent10 -> int4: if the Dalmatian is not a kind of an inevitability or it is a separate or both it is a zarf.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Dalmatian is a kind of a zarf.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the worrier is a slacker.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the implantation is a Tunisian.
sent3 -> int7: if that the benedick is a kind of spatiotemporal thing that is a rounders is not correct it is not a triazolam.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the benedick is not a kind of a triazolam.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not a triazolam.;
$hypothesis$ = the worrier is a slacker if the Pilgrim is a Tunisian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the breadwinner is not crustal the Sivapithecus is not a bracer and is not diluvian. sent2: that the implantation is not an inevitability if the fact that the mallow does not batch easement but it is a kind of a skidder is not right is not false. sent3: something is not a triazolam if the fact that it is both not non-spatiotemporal and a rounders is not true. sent4: the worrier is a Tunisian if that the Pilgrim is a kind of a slacker is not false. sent5: if that the holly does not tack but it is postmenopausal is not true then the breadwinner is not crustal. sent6: if the Pilgrim is not a zarf then the implantation is a Tunisian and it is a kind of an inevitability. sent7: the worrier is a slacker if the Dalmatian is a zarf. sent8: the Dalmatian is not an inevitability or a separate or both if that the implantation is not an inevitability is not incorrect. sent9: the worrier is a chiropractor if the MArch is a kind of a chiropractor. sent10: if something is not a kind of an inevitability and/or it is a separate it is a zarf. sent11: the mallow is not an inevitability if the Dalmatian is a kind of a skidder. sent12: the fact that the mallow batches easement and it is a kind of a skidder does not hold. sent13: if the mallow does not separate the Pilgrim is not a zarf. sent14: the torero is esophageal if the Sivapithecus is not a kind of a bracer and it is not diluvian. sent15: if the Pilgrim is a kind of a Tunisian the fact that the mallow does not batch easement but it is a skidder does not hold. sent16: the Dalmatian is a slacker if the worrier is a chiropractor. sent17: the fact that the benedick is spatiotemporal and it is a rounders is not true. sent18: if the Dalmatian batches easement the fact that the mallow is not a kind of an inevitability and is a kind of a skidder is not right. sent19: the MArch is a chiropractor if the fact that the torero is esophageal hold. sent20: the fact that the worrier is not a slacker but a skidder is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Pilgrim is a Tunisian.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that that the mallow does not batch easement but it is a skidder is wrong is not wrong.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the implantation is not a kind of an inevitability.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Dalmatian is not a kind of an inevitability and/or it is a separate.; sent10 -> int4: if the Dalmatian is not a kind of an inevitability or it is a separate or both it is a zarf.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Dalmatian is a kind of a zarf.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the worrier is a slacker.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__