the lightwood is not juridical.
sent1: if the cefotaxime sharpens that it is a kind of a halfbeak is true. sent2: either the cantilever is juridical or it is not a morocco or both if the tosser is a reason. sent3: something is not electroencephalographic if the fact that it is electroencephalographic and a morocco does not hold. sent4: the lightwood does not reason if that it is a reason and a morocco is wrong. sent5: if something is not a Tetragrammaton it does not consummate cutin and is a reason. sent6: that the lightwood is a reason and it is a morocco does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lightwood is juridical.; sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the lightwood does not reason.;
if that the sandbar is a kind of electroencephalographic thing that is a morocco is wrong then it is not electroencephalographic.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the lightwood is not juridical. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cefotaxime sharpens that it is a kind of a halfbeak is true. sent2: either the cantilever is juridical or it is not a morocco or both if the tosser is a reason. sent3: something is not electroencephalographic if the fact that it is electroencephalographic and a morocco does not hold. sent4: the lightwood does not reason if that it is a reason and a morocco is wrong. sent5: if something is not a Tetragrammaton it does not consummate cutin and is a reason. sent6: that the lightwood is a reason and it is a morocco does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lightwood is juridical.; sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the lightwood does not reason.; __UNKNOWN__