the fact that the pyromaniac is a numbat and it is not compatible is true.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it is cytoarchitectural and does not bop high-mindedness is not right the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural. sent2: the pyromaniac is cytoarchitectural and incompatible. sent3: the fact that something is cytoarchitectural hold if it is not tactile. sent4: the brushwood is caudal if something does not command. sent5: something is not a command. sent6: the pyromaniac is a kind of a command and is incompatible if it is non-caudal. sent7: the fact that the asparaginase is not peaceful is not wrong. sent8: the fact that that the beacon is cytoarchitectural but it does not bop high-mindedness is wrong is not false if the asparaginase is not a kind of a monoamine. sent9: the fact that the pyromaniac is not a numbat and not peaceful does not hold if the brushwood is tactile. sent10: something is cytoarchitectural and does not bop high-mindedness. sent11: if the brushwood is not a numbat the fact that the pyromaniac is a kind of a numbat that is incompatible does not hold. sent12: a peaceful thing that is a kind of a numbat is not tactile. sent13: that the pyromaniac is not caudal is not incorrect if it is both a monoamine and not a Bunche. sent14: if something does not command then it is a numbat that is incompatible. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not cytoarchitectural then the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural. sent16: that something is not communal is not incorrect if that it is peaceful and is communal is false. sent17: if the brushwood does not command then that it is not incompatible and not peaceful does not hold. sent18: the easter is not caudal. sent19: something is a command. sent20: if there exists something such that it does not command the brushwood is not unpeaceful and is caudal. sent21: the brushwood is caudal. sent22: there exists something such that that it is cytoarchitectural and bops high-mindedness is not true. sent23: the asparaginase is not a kind of a monoamine. sent24: that the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural but it bops high-mindedness is not true.
sent5 & sent20 -> int1: the brushwood is peaceful and it is caudal.; int1 -> int2: the brushwood is peaceful.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brushwood is a kind of a numbat.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the brushwood is peaceful thing that is a kind of a numbat.; sent12 -> int4: the brushwood is not tactile if it is peaceful and it is a numbat.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the brushwood is not tactile.; sent3 -> int6: if the brushwood is not tactile then it is cytoarchitectural.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the brushwood is cytoarchitectural.; sent8 & sent23 -> int8: that the beacon is cytoarchitectural and does not bop high-mindedness does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is cytoarchitectural thing that does not bop high-mindedness is not right.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the brushwood is not a numbat.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the pyromaniac is a numbat that is incompatible.
sent14 -> int13: if the brushwood does not command it is a numbat and incompatible.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pyromaniac is a numbat and it is not compatible is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it is cytoarchitectural and does not bop high-mindedness is not right the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural. sent2: the pyromaniac is cytoarchitectural and incompatible. sent3: the fact that something is cytoarchitectural hold if it is not tactile. sent4: the brushwood is caudal if something does not command. sent5: something is not a command. sent6: the pyromaniac is a kind of a command and is incompatible if it is non-caudal. sent7: the fact that the asparaginase is not peaceful is not wrong. sent8: the fact that that the beacon is cytoarchitectural but it does not bop high-mindedness is wrong is not false if the asparaginase is not a kind of a monoamine. sent9: the fact that the pyromaniac is not a numbat and not peaceful does not hold if the brushwood is tactile. sent10: something is cytoarchitectural and does not bop high-mindedness. sent11: if the brushwood is not a numbat the fact that the pyromaniac is a kind of a numbat that is incompatible does not hold. sent12: a peaceful thing that is a kind of a numbat is not tactile. sent13: that the pyromaniac is not caudal is not incorrect if it is both a monoamine and not a Bunche. sent14: if something does not command then it is a numbat that is incompatible. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not cytoarchitectural then the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural. sent16: that something is not communal is not incorrect if that it is peaceful and is communal is false. sent17: if the brushwood does not command then that it is not incompatible and not peaceful does not hold. sent18: the easter is not caudal. sent19: something is a command. sent20: if there exists something such that it does not command the brushwood is not unpeaceful and is caudal. sent21: the brushwood is caudal. sent22: there exists something such that that it is cytoarchitectural and bops high-mindedness is not true. sent23: the asparaginase is not a kind of a monoamine. sent24: that the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural but it bops high-mindedness is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent20 -> int1: the brushwood is peaceful and it is caudal.; int1 -> int2: the brushwood is peaceful.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brushwood is a kind of a numbat.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the brushwood is peaceful thing that is a kind of a numbat.; sent12 -> int4: the brushwood is not tactile if it is peaceful and it is a numbat.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the brushwood is not tactile.; sent3 -> int6: if the brushwood is not tactile then it is cytoarchitectural.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the brushwood is cytoarchitectural.; sent8 & sent23 -> int8: that the beacon is cytoarchitectural and does not bop high-mindedness does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is cytoarchitectural thing that does not bop high-mindedness is not right.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: the brushwood is not cytoarchitectural.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the brushwood is not a numbat.; int12 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__