that if the mastodon is unmalicious then the chaser does not spurt or it is not morbilliform or both is not true.
sent1: the chaser is not unmalicious if something does not spurt and/or it is not morbilliform. sent2: the mastodon is not a kind of a mastoid if the ozonosphere is not mastoid. sent3: the tonguefish does deduce gainer if the mastodon is euclidian. sent4: something that is not a mastoid is a documentary that checkmates sentimentality. sent5: if the extra is a kind of a mastoid but it is not macrobiotics then the ozonosphere is not a kind of a mastoid. sent6: the chaser is morbilliform. sent7: the chaser spurts. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not spurt or it is non-morbilliform or both is not right the mastodon is not unmalicious. sent9: if something does deduce gainer then that it is a fluorescein hold. sent10: something is euclidian if it is documentary. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it spurts and/or is not morbilliform is wrong. sent12: if something is a fluorescein the fact that it does not drive and/or it is malicious is incorrect. sent13: the extra is mastoid but it is not macrobiotics if it is a floe. sent14: the mastodon is not unmalicious if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not spurt or it is morbilliform or both is wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the chaser either does not spurt or is not morbilliform or both does not hold.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does not spurt or it is not morbilliform or both is right is not true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the mastodon is not unmalicious.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mastodon is unmalicious.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the chaser does not spurt and/or it is not morbilliform.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that either the tonguefish is not a kind of a driving or it is not unmalicious or both is not true.
sent12 -> int5: that either the tonguefish is not a driving or it is not unmalicious or both is not right if it is a fluorescein.; sent9 -> int6: the tonguefish is a fluorescein if it deduces gainer.; sent10 -> int7: if the fact that the mastodon is a documentary hold then it is euclidian.; sent4 -> int8: the mastodon is a documentary and it does checkmate sentimentality if it is not a kind of a mastoid.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the mastodon is unmalicious then the chaser does not spurt or it is not morbilliform or both is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the chaser is not unmalicious if something does not spurt and/or it is not morbilliform. sent2: the mastodon is not a kind of a mastoid if the ozonosphere is not mastoid. sent3: the tonguefish does deduce gainer if the mastodon is euclidian. sent4: something that is not a mastoid is a documentary that checkmates sentimentality. sent5: if the extra is a kind of a mastoid but it is not macrobiotics then the ozonosphere is not a kind of a mastoid. sent6: the chaser is morbilliform. sent7: the chaser spurts. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not spurt or it is non-morbilliform or both is not right the mastodon is not unmalicious. sent9: if something does deduce gainer then that it is a fluorescein hold. sent10: something is euclidian if it is documentary. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it spurts and/or is not morbilliform is wrong. sent12: if something is a fluorescein the fact that it does not drive and/or it is malicious is incorrect. sent13: the extra is mastoid but it is not macrobiotics if it is a floe. sent14: the mastodon is not unmalicious if there exists something such that the fact that either it does not spurt or it is morbilliform or both is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the chaser either does not spurt or is not morbilliform or both does not hold.; assump2 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that the fact that it does not spurt or it is not morbilliform or both is right is not true.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the mastodon is not unmalicious.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mastodon is unmalicious.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the chaser does not spurt and/or it is not morbilliform.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__