there exists something such that the fact that it is a monthly and it does not hone mulberry is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that that it is a monthly that hones mulberry is not correct. sent2: there is something such that that that it does not outgrow vector and it does not shiver is not incorrect is not correct. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not outgrow vector and it does not shiver is not right the epauliere does outgrow vector. sent4: the epauliere is a Genevan if there is something such that it is a kind of a Pelham. sent5: something either is a prawn or is lumbosacral or both. sent6: the fact that the caterpillar is a kind of a monthly and does not hone mulberry is not correct if the bookmobile does not recycle. sent7: something is phosphorous and/or it is a Pelham. sent8: if something does recycle then the fact that it is a Genevan and it does not outgrow vector is not true. sent9: if the epauliere is a Genevan and does outgrow vector the bookmobile does not recycle. sent10: the epauliere is a Genevan if there is something such that either it is phosphorous or it is a Pelham or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does shiver then the epauliere does outgrow vector.
sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the epauliere is a Genevan.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the epauliere does outgrow vector.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the epauliere is a Genevan that does outgrow vector is not false.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the bookmobile does not recycle.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the caterpillar is a monthly that does not hone mulberry is not correct.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the repeater branches Visayan but it is not a Pelham does not hold.
sent8 -> int6: that the epauliere is a kind of a Genevan but it does not outgrow vector is not true if it does recycle.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is a monthly and it does not hone mulberry is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is a monthly that hones mulberry is not correct. sent2: there is something such that that that it does not outgrow vector and it does not shiver is not incorrect is not correct. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not outgrow vector and it does not shiver is not right the epauliere does outgrow vector. sent4: the epauliere is a Genevan if there is something such that it is a kind of a Pelham. sent5: something either is a prawn or is lumbosacral or both. sent6: the fact that the caterpillar is a kind of a monthly and does not hone mulberry is not correct if the bookmobile does not recycle. sent7: something is phosphorous and/or it is a Pelham. sent8: if something does recycle then the fact that it is a Genevan and it does not outgrow vector is not true. sent9: if the epauliere is a Genevan and does outgrow vector the bookmobile does not recycle. sent10: the epauliere is a Genevan if there is something such that either it is phosphorous or it is a Pelham or both. sent11: if there exists something such that it does shiver then the epauliere does outgrow vector. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent10 -> int1: the epauliere is a Genevan.; sent2 & sent3 -> int2: the epauliere does outgrow vector.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the epauliere is a Genevan that does outgrow vector is not false.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the bookmobile does not recycle.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the caterpillar is a monthly that does not hone mulberry is not correct.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__