the psittacosaur does impinge flat.
sent1: if the psittacosaur warms the footbridge does impinge flat. sent2: if the sard does impinge hairnet then the psychiatrist warms. sent3: the fact that the psychiatrist does not wilt and does not impinge hairnet does not hold. sent4: something impinges flat if the fact that it is not scholarly and not healthy is wrong. sent5: the footbridge is not aural if that it is not a fluency and it is not unhealthy is false. sent6: if there is something such that it does warm then the psittacosaur does impinge flat and/or it does warm. sent7: if there exists something such that it is aural and/or is a wilt the BASIC is aural. sent8: the finisher is a coulisse if the fact that the bark-louse is not a kind of a defervescence and it is not nonproprietary is not true. sent9: the bark-louse is a kind of a phoenix that does impinge fetometry if something is a kind of a resonance. sent10: if the fact that that that the psychiatrist is not a wilt and does not impinge hairnet is not incorrect does not hold is not wrong then the footbridge is aural. sent11: the footbridge does wilt if it impinges flat. sent12: if the psittacosaur impinges flat then the footbridge impinges flat. sent13: that something is not a defervescence and is not nonproprietary does not hold if it is a phoenix. sent14: if something is aural it is not scholarly. sent15: the fact that if the finisher is a coulisse that the sard does impinge hairnet is right hold. sent16: the dendrite is a resonance. sent17: the fact that the psittacosaur is not scholarly but it is unhealthy is not correct if the footbridge is not unhealthy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the footbridge is not a fluency and it is not unhealthy is not right is correct.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the footbridge is not aural hold.; sent10 & sent3 -> int2: the footbridge is aural.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the footbridge is not a fluency and it is not unhealthy.; int4 -> int5: the footbridge is not unhealthy.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the psittacosaur is a kind of unscholarly thing that is unhealthy is not right.; sent4 -> int7: the psittacosaur does impinge flat if the fact that it is a kind of unscholarly thing that is unhealthy is incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the BASIC is not scholarly.
sent14 -> int8: if the BASIC is aural then it is not scholarly.; sent13 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the bark-louse is not a defervescence and is not nonproprietary is not right is correct if it is a kind of a phoenix.; sent16 -> int10: there exists something such that it is a kind of a resonance.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: the bark-louse is a kind of a phoenix and it impinges fetometry.; int11 -> int12: the bark-louse is a phoenix.; int9 & int12 -> int13: the fact that the bark-louse is not a kind of a defervescence and is not nonproprietary is incorrect.; sent8 & int13 -> int14: the finisher is a coulisse.; sent15 & int14 -> int15: the sard impinges hairnet.; sent2 & int15 -> int16: the psychiatrist does warm.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it is warm.; int17 & sent6 -> int18: the psittacosaur does impinge flat and/or is warm.; int18 & sent12 & sent1 -> int19: the footbridge impinges flat.; sent11 & int19 -> int20: the footbridge is a kind of a wilt.; int20 -> int21: either the footbridge is aural or it is a kind of a wilt or both.; int21 -> int22: either something is aural or it wilts or both.; int22 & sent7 -> int23: the BASIC is aural.; int8 & int23 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the psittacosaur does impinge flat. ; $context$ = sent1: if the psittacosaur warms the footbridge does impinge flat. sent2: if the sard does impinge hairnet then the psychiatrist warms. sent3: the fact that the psychiatrist does not wilt and does not impinge hairnet does not hold. sent4: something impinges flat if the fact that it is not scholarly and not healthy is wrong. sent5: the footbridge is not aural if that it is not a fluency and it is not unhealthy is false. sent6: if there is something such that it does warm then the psittacosaur does impinge flat and/or it does warm. sent7: if there exists something such that it is aural and/or is a wilt the BASIC is aural. sent8: the finisher is a coulisse if the fact that the bark-louse is not a kind of a defervescence and it is not nonproprietary is not true. sent9: the bark-louse is a kind of a phoenix that does impinge fetometry if something is a kind of a resonance. sent10: if the fact that that that the psychiatrist is not a wilt and does not impinge hairnet is not incorrect does not hold is not wrong then the footbridge is aural. sent11: the footbridge does wilt if it impinges flat. sent12: if the psittacosaur impinges flat then the footbridge impinges flat. sent13: that something is not a defervescence and is not nonproprietary does not hold if it is a phoenix. sent14: if something is aural it is not scholarly. sent15: the fact that if the finisher is a coulisse that the sard does impinge hairnet is right hold. sent16: the dendrite is a resonance. sent17: the fact that the psittacosaur is not scholarly but it is unhealthy is not correct if the footbridge is not unhealthy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the footbridge is not a fluency and it is not unhealthy is not right is correct.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the footbridge is not aural hold.; sent10 & sent3 -> int2: the footbridge is aural.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the footbridge is not a fluency and it is not unhealthy.; int4 -> int5: the footbridge is not unhealthy.; int5 & sent17 -> int6: the fact that the psittacosaur is a kind of unscholarly thing that is unhealthy is not right.; sent4 -> int7: the psittacosaur does impinge flat if the fact that it is a kind of unscholarly thing that is unhealthy is incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__