that that the protein is not a Bruno but it is a proctology is incorrect is not incorrect.
sent1: that the biter is non-asexual thing that is a proctology does not hold if the protein does empty Komi. sent2: something is a jamb. sent3: the biter does not scout suffragist. sent4: if the biter empties Komi then the fact that the protein is not a Bruno but it is a proctology is wrong. sent5: if that the macaroni is not a proctology but it empties Komi is not correct then the fact that the protein does not empties Komi is not false. sent6: if something is not asexual and it does not scout suffragist then that it does empty Komi is right. sent7: the fact that the protein is a Bruno and it is a kind of a proctology does not hold. sent8: if the critic is not a quibble and/or it is not asexual then it is not a kind of a quibble. sent9: the fact that the macaroni is a jamb and it is a spotlight is wrong. sent10: the fact that the protein is not a kind of a Bruno but it scouts suffragist is incorrect if the biter is a proctology. sent11: The suffragist does not scout biter. sent12: that the protein does not scout suffragist and does empty Komi does not hold if that the biter is a proctology hold. sent13: if the biter does empty Komi then that that the protein is a Bruno and a proctology is not false is false. sent14: if that the macaroni is a kind of a jamb that does spotlight is not right then it is not a Tennessean. sent15: that the macaroni is not a proctology but it does empty Komi does not hold if it is a kind of a Tennessean. sent16: the biter is not a kind of a proctology. sent17: that the fact that the biter is not a Worcester and does parse hold is not correct. sent18: the biter is not a Bruno.
sent6 -> int1: if the biter is not asexual and it does not scout suffragist then it does empty Komi.;
the critic is not a kind of a quibble and it is not a broadcloth.
$hypothesis$ = that that the protein is not a Bruno but it is a proctology is incorrect is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the biter is non-asexual thing that is a proctology does not hold if the protein does empty Komi. sent2: something is a jamb. sent3: the biter does not scout suffragist. sent4: if the biter empties Komi then the fact that the protein is not a Bruno but it is a proctology is wrong. sent5: if that the macaroni is not a proctology but it empties Komi is not correct then the fact that the protein does not empties Komi is not false. sent6: if something is not asexual and it does not scout suffragist then that it does empty Komi is right. sent7: the fact that the protein is a Bruno and it is a kind of a proctology does not hold. sent8: if the critic is not a quibble and/or it is not asexual then it is not a kind of a quibble. sent9: the fact that the macaroni is a jamb and it is a spotlight is wrong. sent10: the fact that the protein is not a kind of a Bruno but it scouts suffragist is incorrect if the biter is a proctology. sent11: The suffragist does not scout biter. sent12: that the protein does not scout suffragist and does empty Komi does not hold if that the biter is a proctology hold. sent13: if the biter does empty Komi then that that the protein is a Bruno and a proctology is not false is false. sent14: if that the macaroni is a kind of a jamb that does spotlight is not right then it is not a Tennessean. sent15: that the macaroni is not a proctology but it does empty Komi does not hold if it is a kind of a Tennessean. sent16: the biter is not a kind of a proctology. sent17: that the fact that the biter is not a Worcester and does parse hold is not correct. sent18: the biter is not a Bruno. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the biter is not asexual and it does not scout suffragist then it does empty Komi.; __UNKNOWN__