the bastnasite does not paganize.
sent1: if something does not paganize it is not a rhinoscope and it is a nondisjunction. sent2: That the sheller crusts lady's-eardrop hold. sent3: if something is a kind of a zinfandel that is Judaic then it is not a associationism. sent4: if something is transitive and it is cardiac then it does not paganize. sent5: that the lady's-eardrop crusts sheller hold. sent6: the sheller crusts sheller if the lady's-eardrop is both not a rhinoscope and a nondisjunction. sent7: something is not a nondisjunction if it crusts sheller and is a rhinoscope. sent8: the bastnasite does not paganize if the lady's-eardrop is not a kind of a nondisjunction. sent9: the lady's-eardrop is a rhinoscope.
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the lady's-eardrop crusts sheller and is a rhinoscope.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the lady's-eardrop is not the nondisjunction if the lady's-eardrop does crust sheller and is a kind of a rhinoscope is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lady's-eardrop is not a nondisjunction.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sheller does crust sheller is not wrong.
sent1 -> int4: if the lady's-eardrop does not paganize then it is both not a rhinoscope and a nondisjunction.; sent4 -> int5: if the lady's-eardrop is transitive and it is cardiac it does not paganize.;
$hypothesis$ = the bastnasite does not paganize. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not paganize it is not a rhinoscope and it is a nondisjunction. sent2: That the sheller crusts lady's-eardrop hold. sent3: if something is a kind of a zinfandel that is Judaic then it is not a associationism. sent4: if something is transitive and it is cardiac then it does not paganize. sent5: that the lady's-eardrop crusts sheller hold. sent6: the sheller crusts sheller if the lady's-eardrop is both not a rhinoscope and a nondisjunction. sent7: something is not a nondisjunction if it crusts sheller and is a rhinoscope. sent8: the bastnasite does not paganize if the lady's-eardrop is not a kind of a nondisjunction. sent9: the lady's-eardrop is a rhinoscope. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent9 -> int1: the lady's-eardrop crusts sheller and is a rhinoscope.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the lady's-eardrop is not the nondisjunction if the lady's-eardrop does crust sheller and is a kind of a rhinoscope is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the lady's-eardrop is not a nondisjunction.; int3 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__