that the ballistocardiograph is a seigneur but it is not a serve is not true.
sent1: the fact that the foredge drinks undine and serves is not correct. sent2: the timekeeper does not drink undine if that the foredge drinks mill is correct. sent3: if the timekeeper is not a kind of a serve the fact that the ballistocardiograph is a seigneur that is not a kind of a serve is incorrect. sent4: the foredge does not drink undine if there is something such that that it does not carbonate egg and it is a Restoration is not right. sent5: the egg is atrioventricular and is a Hell if the fact that it does not drink undine is not incorrect. sent6: the timekeeper is a Hell if that it is a grumble is not wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not serve that the ballistocardiograph is a serve and is not atrioventricular is not true. sent8: if the jib is not a grumble then that it is not a seigneur and is not a kind of a radiator is incorrect. sent9: if that there is something such that it does not drink undine is not incorrect then that the jib does drink undine but it is not a radiator is not correct. sent10: the inglenook is not unfavorable. sent11: that the timekeeper does not drink mill hold if that the egg does not serve but it does drink mill is not right. sent12: the fact that the ballistocardiograph is a kind of a seigneur that is a serve does not hold if the timekeeper does not serve. sent13: the jib does not grumble. sent14: something is a serve. sent15: something is not a kind of a seigneur but it does drink undine. sent16: if the egg drinks undine the jib does drinks undine but it is not a kind of a radiator. sent17: the timekeeper is a kind of a cockney. sent18: the timekeeper is not atrioventricular if it drinks mill or it serves or both. sent19: the timekeeper does grumble. sent20: the egg drinks undine if something that is not atrioventricular is a Hell. sent21: the fact that something does not realize Esther and does realize inglenook is false if it does not drink mill. sent22: that the timekeeper does drink undine but it is not a Hell is incorrect. sent23: that the fact that something is not a serve and drinks mill is right is not correct if it is atrioventricular. sent24: there exists something such that that it does not carbonate egg and it is a Restoration does not hold. sent25: the jib does drink oppression and does not encrust.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the timekeeper serves.; assump1 -> int1: either the timekeeper drinks mill or it serves or both.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the timekeeper is not atrioventricular hold.; sent6 & sent19 -> int3: the timekeeper is a Hell.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the timekeeper is not atrioventricular but it is a Hell.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not atrioventricular and is a kind of a Hell.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the egg does drink undine.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the jib does drink undine and is not a kind of a radiator.; sent24 & sent4 -> int8: the fact that the foredge does not drink undine is right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does not drink undine.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the fact that the jib drinks undine and is not a radiator does not hold.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the timekeeper is not a serve.; int12 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that the fact that it does not realize Esther and does realize inglenook is not right.
sent21 -> int13: if the timekeeper does not drink mill then the fact that it does not realize Esther and it realizes inglenook is incorrect.; sent23 -> int14: if the egg is atrioventricular the fact that it does not serve and it drinks mill does not hold.; sent8 & sent13 -> int15: the fact that the jib is not a seigneur and it is not a kind of a radiator is incorrect.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it is not a seigneur and it is not a radiator is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ballistocardiograph is a seigneur but it is not a serve is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the foredge drinks undine and serves is not correct. sent2: the timekeeper does not drink undine if that the foredge drinks mill is correct. sent3: if the timekeeper is not a kind of a serve the fact that the ballistocardiograph is a seigneur that is not a kind of a serve is incorrect. sent4: the foredge does not drink undine if there is something such that that it does not carbonate egg and it is a Restoration is not right. sent5: the egg is atrioventricular and is a Hell if the fact that it does not drink undine is not incorrect. sent6: the timekeeper is a Hell if that it is a grumble is not wrong. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not serve that the ballistocardiograph is a serve and is not atrioventricular is not true. sent8: if the jib is not a grumble then that it is not a seigneur and is not a kind of a radiator is incorrect. sent9: if that there is something such that it does not drink undine is not incorrect then that the jib does drink undine but it is not a radiator is not correct. sent10: the inglenook is not unfavorable. sent11: that the timekeeper does not drink mill hold if that the egg does not serve but it does drink mill is not right. sent12: the fact that the ballistocardiograph is a kind of a seigneur that is a serve does not hold if the timekeeper does not serve. sent13: the jib does not grumble. sent14: something is a serve. sent15: something is not a kind of a seigneur but it does drink undine. sent16: if the egg drinks undine the jib does drinks undine but it is not a kind of a radiator. sent17: the timekeeper is a kind of a cockney. sent18: the timekeeper is not atrioventricular if it drinks mill or it serves or both. sent19: the timekeeper does grumble. sent20: the egg drinks undine if something that is not atrioventricular is a Hell. sent21: the fact that something does not realize Esther and does realize inglenook is false if it does not drink mill. sent22: that the timekeeper does drink undine but it is not a Hell is incorrect. sent23: that the fact that something is not a serve and drinks mill is right is not correct if it is atrioventricular. sent24: there exists something such that that it does not carbonate egg and it is a Restoration does not hold. sent25: the jib does drink oppression and does not encrust. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the timekeeper serves.; assump1 -> int1: either the timekeeper drinks mill or it serves or both.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the fact that the timekeeper is not atrioventricular hold.; sent6 & sent19 -> int3: the timekeeper is a Hell.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the timekeeper is not atrioventricular but it is a Hell.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it is not atrioventricular and is a kind of a Hell.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the egg does drink undine.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the jib does drink undine and is not a kind of a radiator.; sent24 & sent4 -> int8: the fact that the foredge does not drink undine is right.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does not drink undine.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the fact that the jib drinks undine and is not a radiator does not hold.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the timekeeper is not a serve.; int12 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__