there exists something such that if it is a rationality then it is a fitment but not a fluorouracil.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a rationality it is a fitment. sent2: there is something such that if it is a rationality then it is a fitment and is a kind of a fluorouracil. sent3: the fact that the ruminant is a fitment and it is the fluorouracil if the ruminant is a rationality is right. sent4: the ruminant is Tajikistani. sent5: if the ruminant is not an ethnocentrism then it is a rationality. sent6: if the ruminant is a rationality it is a fitment. sent7: something is a fitment if it is an ethnocentrism. sent8: the ruminant does not flatter. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is Edwardian is true it is a kind of a Proterochampsa that does not stable dewdrop. sent10: the ruminant is a fitment. sent11: if something is an ethnocentrism then it is both a fitment and not a fluorouracil. sent12: something that is not an ethnocentrism is a kind of a rationality. sent13: the ruminant is a fitment if it is an ethnocentrism. sent14: if something yawps that it is a necklet and is not a kind of a Jimenez is not wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ruminant is not an ethnocentrism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruminant is a kind of a rationality.; sent11 -> int1: if the ruminant is an ethnocentrism it is a kind of a fitment that is not a fluorouracil.;
there exists something such that if it does yawp then the fact that it is a necklet and not a Jimenez is true.
sent14 -> int2: the fact that the halide is a necklet but not a Jimenez hold if it does yawp.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is a rationality then it is a fitment but not a fluorouracil. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a rationality it is a fitment. sent2: there is something such that if it is a rationality then it is a fitment and is a kind of a fluorouracil. sent3: the fact that the ruminant is a fitment and it is the fluorouracil if the ruminant is a rationality is right. sent4: the ruminant is Tajikistani. sent5: if the ruminant is not an ethnocentrism then it is a rationality. sent6: if the ruminant is a rationality it is a fitment. sent7: something is a fitment if it is an ethnocentrism. sent8: the ruminant does not flatter. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is Edwardian is true it is a kind of a Proterochampsa that does not stable dewdrop. sent10: the ruminant is a fitment. sent11: if something is an ethnocentrism then it is both a fitment and not a fluorouracil. sent12: something that is not an ethnocentrism is a kind of a rationality. sent13: the ruminant is a fitment if it is an ethnocentrism. sent14: if something yawps that it is a necklet and is not a kind of a Jimenez is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ruminant is not an ethnocentrism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ruminant is a kind of a rationality.; sent11 -> int1: if the ruminant is an ethnocentrism it is a kind of a fitment that is not a fluorouracil.; __UNKNOWN__