that there is something such that if it is not a Nicklaus and it does not grate unresponsiveness then it does not treat is false.
sent1: the swath is not a kind of a treat if it is not a kind of a Nicklaus and it does grate unresponsiveness. sent2: the swath is not puritanical if it is non-eugenic and it is not an interpreter. sent3: if the swath is not a kind of a Nicklaus and it does not grate unresponsiveness then that it is not a treat is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Nicklaus and does not grate unresponsiveness it does not treat.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not a Nicklaus and it does not grate unresponsiveness then it does not treat is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the swath is not a kind of a treat if it is not a kind of a Nicklaus and it does grate unresponsiveness. sent2: the swath is not puritanical if it is non-eugenic and it is not an interpreter. sent3: if the swath is not a kind of a Nicklaus and it does not grate unresponsiveness then that it is not a treat is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Nicklaus and does not grate unresponsiveness it does not treat. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__