the mistreatment does not occur and the bore occurs.
sent1: the bawling gemma happens and the sensualizing fingerpost occurs. sent2: that the dedicating does not occur is triggered by that both the sensualizing fingerpost and the mistreatment happens. sent3: the dedicating occurs. sent4: if the caprioling happens then the bore occurs. sent5: that the bawling hagiographer happens and the masking vicar happens leads to that the mutter does not occur. sent6: the bawling gemma occurs. sent7: the capriole happens.
sent1 -> int1: the sensualizing fingerpost happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mistreatment occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sensualizing fingerpost and the mistreatment happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the dedicating does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the mistreatment does not occur.; sent4 & sent7 -> int6: the bore happens.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the mistreatment does not occur and the bore occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the bawling gemma happens and the sensualizing fingerpost occurs. sent2: that the dedicating does not occur is triggered by that both the sensualizing fingerpost and the mistreatment happens. sent3: the dedicating occurs. sent4: if the caprioling happens then the bore occurs. sent5: that the bawling hagiographer happens and the masking vicar happens leads to that the mutter does not occur. sent6: the bawling gemma occurs. sent7: the capriole happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the sensualizing fingerpost happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mistreatment occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the sensualizing fingerpost and the mistreatment happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the dedicating does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the mistreatment does not occur.; sent4 & sent7 -> int6: the bore happens.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__