that there exists something such that if it is a dressmaker but not an object it is a bather is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is both a Sciaena and not adrenal it is granuliferous. sent2: the response is a kind of a dressmaker if it is a kind of recoverable thing that is thespian. sent3: there is something such that if it is unnoticeable and does not douse then it is aoristic. sent4: if something is a kind of a dressmaker and is not a kind of an object then it is a kind of a bather. sent5: if the response is a dressmaker and it objects then it is a bather. sent6: if something is a kind of a DLE and it is translational it is a kind of a midstream. sent7: if something does peg reamer but it does not repine behaviorism then it does front vigil.
sent4 -> int1: if the response is a dressmaker and not an object it is a bather.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a dressmaker but not an object it is a bather is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is both a Sciaena and not adrenal it is granuliferous. sent2: the response is a kind of a dressmaker if it is a kind of recoverable thing that is thespian. sent3: there is something such that if it is unnoticeable and does not douse then it is aoristic. sent4: if something is a kind of a dressmaker and is not a kind of an object then it is a kind of a bather. sent5: if the response is a dressmaker and it objects then it is a bather. sent6: if something is a kind of a DLE and it is translational it is a kind of a midstream. sent7: if something does peg reamer but it does not repine behaviorism then it does front vigil. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the response is a dressmaker and not an object it is a bather.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__