the fact that the incest does not elongate hold.
sent1: the chlorine does elongate. sent2: the fact that the decapod is a cross is correct if it cracks. sent3: if the Islamist flames mesohippus the floorwalker is non-irreverent and a nonconformity. sent4: the incest is not a cocarboxylase if there exists something such that it is not a cracking. sent5: the Tupelo is an irrationality and it is a Medicaid if it is not paniculate. sent6: if something is a wattle and an irrationality then the emirate is a apodeme. sent7: the incest elongates and is not a cocarboxylase if there is something such that it does not crack. sent8: there is something such that it is not a kind of a cracking. sent9: something is not a cross and is a charm if that it is a apodeme is not wrong. sent10: if the emirate is a kind of a nonmember that the waffle does flame mesohippus is not false. sent11: that the Tupelo is affixal but it does not kibitz does not hold if it is agronomic. sent12: the footbath is a cocarboxylase if the floorwalker is not irreverent but it is a nonconformity. sent13: if something that does not cross is a charm it is a nonmember. sent14: the fact that the Tupelo does build Enid but it is not a wattle is false if the Demulen is a oxygenase. sent15: the incest is not a cocarboxylase. sent16: if the waffle does flame mesohippus the Islamist does flame mesohippus. sent17: if the fact that the Tupelo builds Enid and does not wattle is not true it is a wattle. sent18: the Demulen is a oxygenase and it is amethystine. sent19: the incest is diatonic. sent20: if the fact that the Tupelo is not non-affixal but it does not kibitz does not hold then it is not paniculate. sent21: the Tupelo is agronomic.
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the incest elongates but it is not a cocarboxylase.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the incest does not elongate.
sent13 -> int2: the emirate is a nonmember if it is not a kind of a cross and is a charm.; sent9 -> int3: the fact that if the emirate is the apodeme then the emirate is not a kind of a cross and is a kind of a charm is not wrong.; sent18 -> int4: the Demulen is a oxygenase.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the Tupelo does build Enid and is not a wattle is incorrect.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the Tupelo is a wattle.; sent11 & sent21 -> int7: the fact that the Tupelo is affixal but it does not kibitz is false.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: the Tupelo is not paniculate.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the Tupelo is an irrationality that is a Medicaid.; int9 -> int10: the Tupelo is an irrationality.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the Tupelo is a kind of a wattle that is an irrationality.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is a wattle and an irrationality.; int12 & sent6 -> int13: the emirate is a apodeme.; int3 & int13 -> int14: the emirate is not a cross but it is a charm.; int2 & int14 -> int15: the emirate is a nonmember.; sent10 & int15 -> int16: the waffle does flame mesohippus.; sent16 & int16 -> int17: the Islamist flames mesohippus.; sent3 & int17 -> int18: the floorwalker is not irreverent but it is a nonconformity.; sent12 & int18 -> int19: the footbath is a kind of a cocarboxylase.; int19 -> int20: either the footbath is a cocarboxylase or it is not a cracking or both.; int20 -> int21: something is a cocarboxylase and/or it is not a cracking.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the incest does not elongate hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the chlorine does elongate. sent2: the fact that the decapod is a cross is correct if it cracks. sent3: if the Islamist flames mesohippus the floorwalker is non-irreverent and a nonconformity. sent4: the incest is not a cocarboxylase if there exists something such that it is not a cracking. sent5: the Tupelo is an irrationality and it is a Medicaid if it is not paniculate. sent6: if something is a wattle and an irrationality then the emirate is a apodeme. sent7: the incest elongates and is not a cocarboxylase if there is something such that it does not crack. sent8: there is something such that it is not a kind of a cracking. sent9: something is not a cross and is a charm if that it is a apodeme is not wrong. sent10: if the emirate is a kind of a nonmember that the waffle does flame mesohippus is not false. sent11: that the Tupelo is affixal but it does not kibitz does not hold if it is agronomic. sent12: the footbath is a cocarboxylase if the floorwalker is not irreverent but it is a nonconformity. sent13: if something that does not cross is a charm it is a nonmember. sent14: the fact that the Tupelo does build Enid but it is not a wattle is false if the Demulen is a oxygenase. sent15: the incest is not a cocarboxylase. sent16: if the waffle does flame mesohippus the Islamist does flame mesohippus. sent17: if the fact that the Tupelo builds Enid and does not wattle is not true it is a wattle. sent18: the Demulen is a oxygenase and it is amethystine. sent19: the incest is diatonic. sent20: if the fact that the Tupelo is not non-affixal but it does not kibitz does not hold then it is not paniculate. sent21: the Tupelo is agronomic. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the incest elongates but it is not a cocarboxylase.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__