the Lilo is a kind of a determinism.
sent1: the landfill is not supportive if that the forewoman is not a dominatrix and/or it is supportive does not hold. sent2: if that that something is a kind of a dominatrix or it is hydraulic or both hold is not correct it is not a determinism. sent3: the forewoman does not copy sprag. sent4: if that the forewoman is not unsupportive and it is a quoin does not hold then the esker is not a dominatrix. sent5: the fact that the Lilo is not a quoin is right. sent6: the fact that the fact that the Lilo is a dominatrix and/or is hydraulic is not right is not wrong if the esker is not a dominatrix. sent7: if the forewoman is not a quoin the esker is not a kind of a dominatrix. sent8: if a hydraulic thing is a kind of a centered it is not a dominatrix. sent9: the fact that the Lilo is a kind of a determinism and it is a kind of a quoin does not hold. sent10: the Lilo is not hydraulic if the esker is not a dominatrix. sent11: that the forewoman is supportive and it is a kind of a quoin does not hold if it does not copy sprag. sent12: the Lilo is not hydraulic. sent13: the fact that either the forewoman is not a kind of a dominatrix or it is supportive or both does not hold if the esker does not copy sprag. sent14: The sprag does not copy forewoman.
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: that the forewoman is supportive and a quoin is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the esker is not a dominatrix.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that that the Lilo is a dominatrix or hydraulic or both is incorrect is true.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the Lilo either is a dominatrix or is hydraulic or both does not hold it is not a determinism.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the Lilo is a determinism.
sent8 -> int5: the Lilo is not a dominatrix if the fact that it is hydraulic and it is a kind of a centered hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the Lilo is a kind of a determinism. ; $context$ = sent1: the landfill is not supportive if that the forewoman is not a dominatrix and/or it is supportive does not hold. sent2: if that that something is a kind of a dominatrix or it is hydraulic or both hold is not correct it is not a determinism. sent3: the forewoman does not copy sprag. sent4: if that the forewoman is not unsupportive and it is a quoin does not hold then the esker is not a dominatrix. sent5: the fact that the Lilo is not a quoin is right. sent6: the fact that the fact that the Lilo is a dominatrix and/or is hydraulic is not right is not wrong if the esker is not a dominatrix. sent7: if the forewoman is not a quoin the esker is not a kind of a dominatrix. sent8: if a hydraulic thing is a kind of a centered it is not a dominatrix. sent9: the fact that the Lilo is a kind of a determinism and it is a kind of a quoin does not hold. sent10: the Lilo is not hydraulic if the esker is not a dominatrix. sent11: that the forewoman is supportive and it is a kind of a quoin does not hold if it does not copy sprag. sent12: the Lilo is not hydraulic. sent13: the fact that either the forewoman is not a kind of a dominatrix or it is supportive or both does not hold if the esker does not copy sprag. sent14: The sprag does not copy forewoman. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent3 -> int1: that the forewoman is supportive and a quoin is not true.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the esker is not a dominatrix.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that that the Lilo is a dominatrix or hydraulic or both is incorrect is true.; sent2 -> int4: if the fact that the Lilo either is a dominatrix or is hydraulic or both does not hold it is not a determinism.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__