the fact that the crevice is non-collegiate if the burnous does not sparge and is not a fugu does not hold.
sent1: if something is not postdoctoral that it is not unhealthful and it is a kind of an equipment hold. sent2: if the crevice does japan empiricism and it is a postdoctoral then it is not collegiate. sent3: if something does not japan empiricism but it is a postdoctoral then it is collegiate. sent4: if the burnous does not sparge and it is not a fugu then the head is not an equipment. sent5: the burnous is not a fugu. sent6: if the crevice is a kind of an equipment but it does not japan empiricism the head is not postdoctoral. sent7: if the fact that the head is not an equipment is correct then the crevice does not japan empiricism but it is not non-postdoctoral. sent8: if the burnous sparges but it does not japan empiricism then the crevice is not a postdoctoral. sent9: the crevice is collegiate. sent10: if something that does not japan empiricism is postdoctoral then it is not collegiate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the burnous does not sparge and is not a fugu.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the head is not an equipment.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the crevice does not japan empiricism but it is a postdoctoral.; sent10 -> int3: the crevice is not collegiate if it does not japan empiricism and it is postdoctoral.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the crevice is not collegiate.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the marum is sanitary an equipment.
sent1 -> int5: the marum is both not unhealthful and an equipment if it is not postdoctoral.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the crevice is non-collegiate if the burnous does not sparge and is not a fugu does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not postdoctoral that it is not unhealthful and it is a kind of an equipment hold. sent2: if the crevice does japan empiricism and it is a postdoctoral then it is not collegiate. sent3: if something does not japan empiricism but it is a postdoctoral then it is collegiate. sent4: if the burnous does not sparge and it is not a fugu then the head is not an equipment. sent5: the burnous is not a fugu. sent6: if the crevice is a kind of an equipment but it does not japan empiricism the head is not postdoctoral. sent7: if the fact that the head is not an equipment is correct then the crevice does not japan empiricism but it is not non-postdoctoral. sent8: if the burnous sparges but it does not japan empiricism then the crevice is not a postdoctoral. sent9: the crevice is collegiate. sent10: if something that does not japan empiricism is postdoctoral then it is not collegiate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the burnous does not sparge and is not a fugu.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the head is not an equipment.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the crevice does not japan empiricism but it is a postdoctoral.; sent10 -> int3: the crevice is not collegiate if it does not japan empiricism and it is postdoctoral.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the crevice is not collegiate.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__