the naphthol is a kind of a flutter.
sent1: something is not a laugher but it is a probabilism if it is a kind of a broomstick. sent2: the supplier transits if the bran is not a laugher and is a probabilism. sent3: if something is not a broomstick then it beats Zostera. sent4: the naphthol does not transit. sent5: the naphthol does not flutter if the supplier transits and is merciful. sent6: if the charioteer is non-Himalayan that it is not a weepiness and it beats Zostera is not true. sent7: if that the charioteer is not a weepiness and does beat Zostera is false the bran does not beat Zostera. sent8: the fact that the swaggerer is a moronity and not a flash does not hold. sent9: the supplier is not a broomstick if the fact that the bran does not transit and is a broomstick is not right. sent10: if the naphthol is a probabilism and it does flutter then that the bran is not Himalayan hold. sent11: if that the naphthol does not beat Zostera hold it is a flutter. sent12: the charioteer spots lioness if it is not a kind of a probabilism. sent13: the charioteer is not Himalayan. sent14: the supplier is merciful if there exists something such that that it is a moronity and it is not a kind of a flash does not hold. sent15: the supplier is not a kind of a flash.
sent3 -> int1: the bran beats Zostera if it is not a kind of a broomstick.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bran is not a kind of a broomstick.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bran does beat Zostera.; sent6 & sent13 -> int3: the fact that the charioteer is not a weepiness and beats Zostera is incorrect.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the bran does not beat Zostera.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bran is a broomstick.; sent1 -> int7: if the bran is a broomstick it is not a laugher and it is a probabilism.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bran is not a laugher but it is a kind of a probabilism.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the fact that the supplier does transit is not false.; sent8 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is a moronity and it is not a flash is incorrect.; int10 & sent14 -> int11: the supplier is merciful.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the supplier does transit and it is merciful.; int12 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the naphthol is a kind of a flutter. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a laugher but it is a probabilism if it is a kind of a broomstick. sent2: the supplier transits if the bran is not a laugher and is a probabilism. sent3: if something is not a broomstick then it beats Zostera. sent4: the naphthol does not transit. sent5: the naphthol does not flutter if the supplier transits and is merciful. sent6: if the charioteer is non-Himalayan that it is not a weepiness and it beats Zostera is not true. sent7: if that the charioteer is not a weepiness and does beat Zostera is false the bran does not beat Zostera. sent8: the fact that the swaggerer is a moronity and not a flash does not hold. sent9: the supplier is not a broomstick if the fact that the bran does not transit and is a broomstick is not right. sent10: if the naphthol is a probabilism and it does flutter then that the bran is not Himalayan hold. sent11: if that the naphthol does not beat Zostera hold it is a flutter. sent12: the charioteer spots lioness if it is not a kind of a probabilism. sent13: the charioteer is not Himalayan. sent14: the supplier is merciful if there exists something such that that it is a moronity and it is not a kind of a flash does not hold. sent15: the supplier is not a kind of a flash. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the bran beats Zostera if it is not a kind of a broomstick.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bran is not a kind of a broomstick.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bran does beat Zostera.; sent6 & sent13 -> int3: the fact that the charioteer is not a weepiness and beats Zostera is incorrect.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the bran does not beat Zostera.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the bran is a broomstick.; sent1 -> int7: if the bran is a broomstick it is not a laugher and it is a probabilism.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the bran is not a laugher but it is a kind of a probabilism.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the fact that the supplier does transit is not false.; sent8 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is a moronity and it is not a flash is incorrect.; int10 & sent14 -> int11: the supplier is merciful.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the supplier does transit and it is merciful.; int12 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__