that there is something such that if it touts sell it is both fingerless and not a theta is not right.
sent1: there is something such that if it is angiomatous it is not a sentimentalization. sent2: there is something such that if it touts sell then it is fingerless and a theta. sent3: the fluorochrome is fingerless but it is not a theta if it does tout sell. sent4: there is something such that if it does tout sell it is fingerless. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a beagle it is a copal and is non-narcoleptic. sent6: that if the fluorochrome does tout sell the fluorochrome is not a kind of a theta is true. sent7: something is antimagnetic and does not clap Jay if it is not non-masculine. sent8: there is something such that if it touts sell then it is not a theta.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the fluorochrome is a kind of a masculine then it is antimagnetic and it does not clap Jay.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it touts sell it is both fingerless and not a theta is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is angiomatous it is not a sentimentalization. sent2: there is something such that if it touts sell then it is fingerless and a theta. sent3: the fluorochrome is fingerless but it is not a theta if it does tout sell. sent4: there is something such that if it does tout sell it is fingerless. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a beagle it is a copal and is non-narcoleptic. sent6: that if the fluorochrome does tout sell the fluorochrome is not a kind of a theta is true. sent7: something is antimagnetic and does not clap Jay if it is not non-masculine. sent8: there is something such that if it touts sell then it is not a theta. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__