the hickory is not monatomic if the tin is not a Logrono and it is not an outboard.
sent1: if the tin gambles then it does laicize Mazzini and it does not guarantee Marconi. sent2: if something queens Mankato it is not an outboard. sent3: something is not an outboard if it is trapezoidal and/or it queens Mankato. sent4: the hickory is not monatomic if the tin is not a Logrono and is an outboard. sent5: the hickory is monatomic if the tin is both not a Logrono and not an outboard. sent6: if the fact that the papain is an outboard does not hold then the fact that the tin is not a Logrono and it is not a kind of an outboard is incorrect. sent7: the papain is not outboard if it queens Mankato. sent8: that the violinist is not a kicker but it does laicize Mazzini does not hold if there exists something such that it is trihydroxy. sent9: if there exists something such that it is trihydroxy that the violinist is a kicker that does not laicize Mazzini is not true. sent10: the fact that the violinist is a kicker but it does not laicize Mazzini is incorrect. sent11: if something does laicize Mazzini but it does not guarantee Marconi then the fact that it is trihydroxy is true. sent12: if the tin is trihydroxy it is a kind of a Logrono that is not monatomic. sent13: the fact that the papain either is not non-trapezoidal or does queen Mankato or both if the hickory is not wingless is correct. sent14: the fact that the violinist is not a kicker and laicizes Mazzini is false. sent15: there is something such that it is trihydroxy. sent16: that that the tin is not a Logrono but it is not non-outboard is correct is false. sent17: the tin is not an outboard. sent18: if that the violinist is not a kicker and it does not laicize Mazzini is not right the hickory is a kind of a kicker. sent19: that if there exists something such that it is a kind of an outboard then the hickory is a kicker and/or it is wingless is true. sent20: the hickory is monatomic if it is a kicker and it is wingless. sent21: if the hickory is a kicker and it is wingless it is not monatomic. sent22: if the papain is not a kind of an outboard the fact that the tin is not a Logrono but it is outboard does not hold. sent23: that if there is something such that it is trihydroxy that the violinist is not a kicker and it does not laicize Mazzini is wrong hold. sent24: the hickory is monatomic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hickory is winged.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the papain is trapezoidal or it does queen Mankato or both.; sent3 -> int2: if the papain is trapezoidal and/or it queens Mankato it is non-outboard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the papain is not an outboard.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the tin is both not a Logrono and not an outboard is not right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tin is not a Logrono and is not outboard.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hickory is wingless.; sent15 & sent23 -> int7: that the violinist is not a kicker and does not laicize Mazzini is not true.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the hickory is a kicker.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the hickory is a kicker and it is wingless.; int9 & sent21 -> int10: the hickory is not monatomic.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the tenterhook is wingless.
sent11 -> int11: if the tin laicizes Mazzini but it does not guarantee Marconi then it is trihydroxy.;
$hypothesis$ = the hickory is not monatomic if the tin is not a Logrono and it is not an outboard. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tin gambles then it does laicize Mazzini and it does not guarantee Marconi. sent2: if something queens Mankato it is not an outboard. sent3: something is not an outboard if it is trapezoidal and/or it queens Mankato. sent4: the hickory is not monatomic if the tin is not a Logrono and is an outboard. sent5: the hickory is monatomic if the tin is both not a Logrono and not an outboard. sent6: if the fact that the papain is an outboard does not hold then the fact that the tin is not a Logrono and it is not a kind of an outboard is incorrect. sent7: the papain is not outboard if it queens Mankato. sent8: that the violinist is not a kicker but it does laicize Mazzini does not hold if there exists something such that it is trihydroxy. sent9: if there exists something such that it is trihydroxy that the violinist is a kicker that does not laicize Mazzini is not true. sent10: the fact that the violinist is a kicker but it does not laicize Mazzini is incorrect. sent11: if something does laicize Mazzini but it does not guarantee Marconi then the fact that it is trihydroxy is true. sent12: if the tin is trihydroxy it is a kind of a Logrono that is not monatomic. sent13: the fact that the papain either is not non-trapezoidal or does queen Mankato or both if the hickory is not wingless is correct. sent14: the fact that the violinist is not a kicker and laicizes Mazzini is false. sent15: there is something such that it is trihydroxy. sent16: that that the tin is not a Logrono but it is not non-outboard is correct is false. sent17: the tin is not an outboard. sent18: if that the violinist is not a kicker and it does not laicize Mazzini is not right the hickory is a kind of a kicker. sent19: that if there exists something such that it is a kind of an outboard then the hickory is a kicker and/or it is wingless is true. sent20: the hickory is monatomic if it is a kicker and it is wingless. sent21: if the hickory is a kicker and it is wingless it is not monatomic. sent22: if the papain is not a kind of an outboard the fact that the tin is not a Logrono but it is outboard does not hold. sent23: that if there is something such that it is trihydroxy that the violinist is not a kicker and it does not laicize Mazzini is wrong hold. sent24: the hickory is monatomic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hickory is winged.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the papain is trapezoidal or it does queen Mankato or both.; sent3 -> int2: if the papain is trapezoidal and/or it queens Mankato it is non-outboard.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the papain is not an outboard.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the tin is both not a Logrono and not an outboard is not right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tin is not a Logrono and is not outboard.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hickory is wingless.; sent15 & sent23 -> int7: that the violinist is not a kicker and does not laicize Mazzini is not true.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the hickory is a kicker.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the hickory is a kicker and it is wingless.; int9 & sent21 -> int10: the hickory is not monatomic.; [assump2] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__