the durmast is a Rhinolophidae and does not ebb cosecant.
sent1: something that does not propagate is both not a twins and wet. sent2: the singleton is a universalism. sent3: that the durmast does propagate but it is not tactile is not wrong. sent4: the fact that that the singleton does not twin but it does wet is not true hold if the durmast is not wet. sent5: if the singleton does not multiply it is a universalism and it is not a kind of a controversy. sent6: if the durmast is not a controversy it does not manacle Brobdingnag and is a sojourn. sent7: the singleton is a kind of a universalism if it does not multiply. sent8: if something is a Rhinolophidae and does not ebb cosecant then it does not wet. sent9: the fact that the durmast is not wet if the durmast is a kind of a Rhinolophidae that does ebb cosecant is true. sent10: the fact that the fact that the durmast is a Rhinolophidae and it ebbs cosecant does not hold is right. sent11: if the singleton does not propagate it is wet. sent12: if either something does not propagate or it is not a kind of a twins or both it does not propagate. sent13: the singleton does not multiply. sent14: the singleton wets. sent15: if something that is a universalism is not a controversy then the fact that it does not propagate is correct. sent16: something does wet if it does not propagate. sent17: the durmast does not ebb cosecant.
sent8 -> int1: if the durmast is a Rhinolophidae but it does not ebb cosecant it is not wet.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the durmast is a Rhinolophidae and does not ebb cosecant.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the durmast does not wet.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the fact that the singleton is not a twins but wet is not incorrect does not hold.; sent1 -> int4: if the singleton does not propagate it is not a twins and does wet.; sent15 -> int5: the fact that if the singleton is a universalism and not the controversy the singleton does not propagate is not wrong.; sent5 & sent13 -> int6: the singleton is a kind of a universalism and is not a controversy.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the singleton does not propagate.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the singleton is not a twins but wet.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the durmast is a Rhinolophidae but it does not ebb cosecant.
sent12 -> int10: the durmast does not propagate if it does not propagate and/or it is not a twins.;
$hypothesis$ = the durmast is a Rhinolophidae and does not ebb cosecant. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not propagate is both not a twins and wet. sent2: the singleton is a universalism. sent3: that the durmast does propagate but it is not tactile is not wrong. sent4: the fact that that the singleton does not twin but it does wet is not true hold if the durmast is not wet. sent5: if the singleton does not multiply it is a universalism and it is not a kind of a controversy. sent6: if the durmast is not a controversy it does not manacle Brobdingnag and is a sojourn. sent7: the singleton is a kind of a universalism if it does not multiply. sent8: if something is a Rhinolophidae and does not ebb cosecant then it does not wet. sent9: the fact that the durmast is not wet if the durmast is a kind of a Rhinolophidae that does ebb cosecant is true. sent10: the fact that the fact that the durmast is a Rhinolophidae and it ebbs cosecant does not hold is right. sent11: if the singleton does not propagate it is wet. sent12: if either something does not propagate or it is not a kind of a twins or both it does not propagate. sent13: the singleton does not multiply. sent14: the singleton wets. sent15: if something that is a universalism is not a controversy then the fact that it does not propagate is correct. sent16: something does wet if it does not propagate. sent17: the durmast does not ebb cosecant. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the durmast is a Rhinolophidae but it does not ebb cosecant it is not wet.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the durmast is a Rhinolophidae and does not ebb cosecant.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the durmast does not wet.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the fact that the singleton is not a twins but wet is not incorrect does not hold.; sent1 -> int4: if the singleton does not propagate it is not a twins and does wet.; sent15 -> int5: the fact that if the singleton is a universalism and not the controversy the singleton does not propagate is not wrong.; sent5 & sent13 -> int6: the singleton is a kind of a universalism and is not a controversy.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the singleton does not propagate.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the singleton is not a twins but wet.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__