the nephron processes speech and is not a kind of a arcus.
sent1: something that does not process velleity is a kind of a masdevallia that does not process sportscast. sent2: the fact that the ovenbird does not process velleity hold if the fact that either the toke is a arcus or it does not process velleity or both is false. sent3: there exists something such that it either is vestibular or does not process velleity or both. sent4: there is something such that it is not vestibular or it does process velleity or both. sent5: the nephron processes speech. sent6: the nephron is not a arcus if there is something such that it is not vestibular or it does not process velleity or both. sent7: the boyfriend either is not vestibular or does process velleity or both. sent8: that something is not a masdevallia but it processes sportscast is not correct if it does not process velleity. sent9: the toke does not dissent ruck if there is something such that that it is not fenestral is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the boyfriend either is not vestibular or is not a kind of a arcus or both is correct. sent11: something does not process velleity if that it is not an etcetera hold. sent12: the nephron is vestibular if the ovenbird is a masdevallia. sent13: something that does not dissent ruck does process speech and is an etcetera. sent14: there exists something such that it is not fenestral. sent15: the boyfriend is not a kind of a masdevallia. sent16: that something does process speech and is not a arcus is incorrect if it is not vestibular. sent17: The speech processes nephron. sent18: something does process sportscast if it is vestibular. sent19: the ovenbird is not an etcetera if the fact that it is an etcetera and it is not fenestral is not true.
sent18 -> int1: the boyfriend does process sportscast if it is vestibular.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the boyfriend is vestibular.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the boyfriend processes sportscast.;
the nephron is vestibular.
sent1 -> int3: the ovenbird is a kind of a masdevallia that does not process sportscast if it does not process velleity.; sent13 -> int4: if the toke does not dissent ruck it processes speech and is an etcetera.; sent14 & sent9 -> int5: the toke does not dissent ruck.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the toke does process speech and it is an etcetera.; int6 -> int7: the toke processes speech.;
$hypothesis$ = the nephron processes speech and is not a kind of a arcus. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not process velleity is a kind of a masdevallia that does not process sportscast. sent2: the fact that the ovenbird does not process velleity hold if the fact that either the toke is a arcus or it does not process velleity or both is false. sent3: there exists something such that it either is vestibular or does not process velleity or both. sent4: there is something such that it is not vestibular or it does process velleity or both. sent5: the nephron processes speech. sent6: the nephron is not a arcus if there is something such that it is not vestibular or it does not process velleity or both. sent7: the boyfriend either is not vestibular or does process velleity or both. sent8: that something is not a masdevallia but it processes sportscast is not correct if it does not process velleity. sent9: the toke does not dissent ruck if there is something such that that it is not fenestral is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that the boyfriend either is not vestibular or is not a kind of a arcus or both is correct. sent11: something does not process velleity if that it is not an etcetera hold. sent12: the nephron is vestibular if the ovenbird is a masdevallia. sent13: something that does not dissent ruck does process speech and is an etcetera. sent14: there exists something such that it is not fenestral. sent15: the boyfriend is not a kind of a masdevallia. sent16: that something does process speech and is not a arcus is incorrect if it is not vestibular. sent17: The speech processes nephron. sent18: something does process sportscast if it is vestibular. sent19: the ovenbird is not an etcetera if the fact that it is an etcetera and it is not fenestral is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the boyfriend does process sportscast if it is vestibular.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the boyfriend is vestibular.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the boyfriend processes sportscast.; __UNKNOWN__