that there exists something such that if that it is non-robotics thing that does not tweedle plausibility does not hold the fact that it does not power is true is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that the weaver is a steal and is not a kind of a wristband does not hold then it is not a power. sent2: the weaver is not a kind of a power if that it is not robotics and does not tweedle plausibility is not true. sent3: the weaver does not power if it does tweedle plausibility. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of robotics thing that does not tweedle plausibility is not right it does not power. sent5: if the weaver does not tweedle plausibility and is not a Hyperoglyphe then it does not tweedle Nero. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does not recombine brother-in-law and is attentive is not correct then it is not fewest. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-hyperemic thing that is not a myeloblast then it is not thirsty. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is not a gyroscope and does abdicate Zeus is false it is discriminate. sent9: there is something such that if it is a heat then it is not hemodynamic. sent10: that there exists something such that if that it does not splutter Chlorococcum and it is not seminiferous does not hold it is Kafkaesque is not wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it does tweedle plausibility then the fact that it is not a power hold. sent12: there is something such that if that it is both not fewest and a segment is incorrect it is not a inerrancy. sent13: if that the misogynist is both not non-blastomeric and not robotics is not correct then it is not a bastardization. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is not impractical and it is not a mid-off is false it is entomological. sent15: there exists something such that if it is robotics it does not power. sent16: there is something such that if it does not tweedle Nero and is not departmental then it is not blastomeric. sent17: the abecedarian does not invoke if it is a Unionidae. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it does tweedle SBA and is not a amoralist does not hold then the fact that it is not a bastardization is correct. sent19: that there exists something such that if that it is not robotics and does not tweedle plausibility is false then it powers is correct. sent20: if that something is a kind of non-infinitival thing that is not milch is not correct it is not a Lagarostrobus. sent21: there is something such that if that it is not robotics and it tweedles plausibility does not hold it is not a power.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it is non-infinitival and is not milch is false it is not a Lagarostrobus.
sent20 -> int1: if the fact that the Pound is not infinitival and it is not milch is not right it is not a Lagarostrobus.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if that it is non-robotics thing that does not tweedle plausibility does not hold the fact that it does not power is true is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the weaver is a steal and is not a kind of a wristband does not hold then it is not a power. sent2: the weaver is not a kind of a power if that it is not robotics and does not tweedle plausibility is not true. sent3: the weaver does not power if it does tweedle plausibility. sent4: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of robotics thing that does not tweedle plausibility is not right it does not power. sent5: if the weaver does not tweedle plausibility and is not a Hyperoglyphe then it does not tweedle Nero. sent6: there exists something such that if that it does not recombine brother-in-law and is attentive is not correct then it is not fewest. sent7: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-hyperemic thing that is not a myeloblast then it is not thirsty. sent8: there exists something such that if that it is not a gyroscope and does abdicate Zeus is false it is discriminate. sent9: there is something such that if it is a heat then it is not hemodynamic. sent10: that there exists something such that if that it does not splutter Chlorococcum and it is not seminiferous does not hold it is Kafkaesque is not wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it does tweedle plausibility then the fact that it is not a power hold. sent12: there is something such that if that it is both not fewest and a segment is incorrect it is not a inerrancy. sent13: if that the misogynist is both not non-blastomeric and not robotics is not correct then it is not a bastardization. sent14: there is something such that if the fact that it is not impractical and it is not a mid-off is false it is entomological. sent15: there exists something such that if it is robotics it does not power. sent16: there is something such that if it does not tweedle Nero and is not departmental then it is not blastomeric. sent17: the abecedarian does not invoke if it is a Unionidae. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it does tweedle SBA and is not a amoralist does not hold then the fact that it is not a bastardization is correct. sent19: that there exists something such that if that it is not robotics and does not tweedle plausibility is false then it powers is correct. sent20: if that something is a kind of non-infinitival thing that is not milch is not correct it is not a Lagarostrobus. sent21: there is something such that if that it is not robotics and it tweedles plausibility does not hold it is not a power. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__