there exists something such that if it is not tactile then it boondoggles and/or it reassails punnet.
sent1: if something is not non-gubernatorial then it does reassail punnet. sent2: if the oncidium is tactile it is gubernatorial. sent3: if the oncidium is tactile either it is a boondoggle or it does reassail punnet or both. sent4: something that is tactile enlivens B. sent5: if the Trilby does not reassail Jinja then it enlivens pyrophosphate. sent6: the oncidium is gubernatorial if it is not tactile. sent7: there exists something such that if it is tactile then it is a kind of a boondoggle and/or reassails punnet.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oncidium is not tactile.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the oncidium is gubernatorial.; sent1 -> int2: if the oncidium is gubernatorial that it does reassail punnet is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the oncidium does reassail punnet is not false.; int3 -> int4: the oncidium is a boondoggle and/or it does reassail punnet.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: if the oncidium is non-tactile it either does boondoggle or does reassail punnet or both.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the oncidium does enliven B.
sent4 -> int6: if that the oncidium is tactile is not false it enlivens B.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not tactile then it boondoggles and/or it reassails punnet. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not non-gubernatorial then it does reassail punnet. sent2: if the oncidium is tactile it is gubernatorial. sent3: if the oncidium is tactile either it is a boondoggle or it does reassail punnet or both. sent4: something that is tactile enlivens B. sent5: if the Trilby does not reassail Jinja then it enlivens pyrophosphate. sent6: the oncidium is gubernatorial if it is not tactile. sent7: there exists something such that if it is tactile then it is a kind of a boondoggle and/or reassails punnet. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the oncidium is not tactile.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the oncidium is gubernatorial.; sent1 -> int2: if the oncidium is gubernatorial that it does reassail punnet is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the oncidium does reassail punnet is not false.; int3 -> int4: the oncidium is a boondoggle and/or it does reassail punnet.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: if the oncidium is non-tactile it either does boondoggle or does reassail punnet or both.; int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__