the dictating Kirkia does not occur and the sagging epicardium does not occur.
sent1: if that both the non-anictericness and the comicness occurs is not correct then the arguing occurs. sent2: the dictating Kirkia does not occur if the violence occurs and the arguing occurs. sent3: the sagging paramountcy happens. sent4: the arguing occurs if the comicness does not occur. sent5: the violence and the sagging dachshund occurs. sent6: if the sagging paramountcy happens then the sagging epicardium does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-anictericness and the comicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the anictericness does not occur.; sent5 -> int2: the violence occurs.; sent6 & sent3 -> int3: the sagging epicardium does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the dictating Kirkia does not occur and the sagging epicardium does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that both the non-anictericness and the comicness occurs is not correct then the arguing occurs. sent2: the dictating Kirkia does not occur if the violence occurs and the arguing occurs. sent3: the sagging paramountcy happens. sent4: the arguing occurs if the comicness does not occur. sent5: the violence and the sagging dachshund occurs. sent6: if the sagging paramountcy happens then the sagging epicardium does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that both the non-anictericness and the comicness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the anictericness does not occur.; sent5 -> int2: the violence occurs.; sent6 & sent3 -> int3: the sagging epicardium does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__