that there is something such that if it is a kind of a diversification it is both non-anoxemic and an assistant is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that if it is postbiblical it does not slave identity and it is a kind of a coup. sent2: that if the slicker is the diversification the slicker is anoxemic and is an assistant is not false. sent3: the conciliator is not an assistant and slaves FLETC if it is pedagogical. sent4: something is non-ungrateful thing that does slave postulate if the fact that it slaves Pagophilus is not false. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a diversification is right it is a kind of an assistant. sent6: the shofar is not hemodynamic and is a kind of a spinner if the fact that it is a elephant's-foot hold. sent7: if that something is a diversification hold then it is not anoxemic and it is a kind of an assistant. sent8: something is not a koruna but it is absolute if it is a samite. sent9: there exists something such that if it is centesimal then it is not chemiluminescent and it is a kind of an opened. sent10: something does not liquefy waterline and is anoxemic if it is expensive. sent11: the slicker is an assistant if it is a kind of a diversification. sent12: something is not a acidemia but it is insurrectional if it is a kind of an antiseptic. sent13: something is not nonextensile but it is consistent if it is an intellectual. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a diversification then it is anoxemic and it is an assistant. sent15: if something is Aegean it is non-angiospermous thing that is a crockery. sent16: something is a kind of non-expensive thing that bosoms if it is a seven. sent17: there is something such that if it is a diversification the fact that it is not anoxemic hold.
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the slicker is a diversification is not wrong it is not anoxemic but an assistant.; int1 -> hypothesis;
if the forehead is not non-expensive it does not liquefy waterline and is not non-anoxemic.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a kind of a diversification it is both non-anoxemic and an assistant is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is postbiblical it does not slave identity and it is a kind of a coup. sent2: that if the slicker is the diversification the slicker is anoxemic and is an assistant is not false. sent3: the conciliator is not an assistant and slaves FLETC if it is pedagogical. sent4: something is non-ungrateful thing that does slave postulate if the fact that it slaves Pagophilus is not false. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a diversification is right it is a kind of an assistant. sent6: the shofar is not hemodynamic and is a kind of a spinner if the fact that it is a elephant's-foot hold. sent7: if that something is a diversification hold then it is not anoxemic and it is a kind of an assistant. sent8: something is not a koruna but it is absolute if it is a samite. sent9: there exists something such that if it is centesimal then it is not chemiluminescent and it is a kind of an opened. sent10: something does not liquefy waterline and is anoxemic if it is expensive. sent11: the slicker is an assistant if it is a kind of a diversification. sent12: something is not a acidemia but it is insurrectional if it is a kind of an antiseptic. sent13: something is not nonextensile but it is consistent if it is an intellectual. sent14: there is something such that if it is a kind of a diversification then it is anoxemic and it is an assistant. sent15: if something is Aegean it is non-angiospermous thing that is a crockery. sent16: something is a kind of non-expensive thing that bosoms if it is a seven. sent17: there is something such that if it is a diversification the fact that it is not anoxemic hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the slicker is a diversification is not wrong it is not anoxemic but an assistant.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__