that the dimmer does not scorch kernite and is a intentionality does not hold.
sent1: something is not a kind of a intentionality if that it is a tack and it does not squire Yuan does not hold. sent2: if the gargoyle is polyatomic that the workroom does not tack and does not squire Yuan is wrong. sent3: the Maalox does tack if that the workroom is not a tack and does not squire Yuan is false. sent4: if something is a tack it does not scorch kernite. sent5: there is nothing such that it does not tack and does not squire Yuan. sent6: the dimmer does not scorch kernite. sent7: if something does tack it does not scorch kernite and it is a kind of a intentionality. sent8: the fact that the dimmer does not squire Yuan hold. sent9: that the dimmer does not scorch kernite and is a intentionality does not hold if the fact that the brooklime is a tack is not wrong. sent10: the dimmer is not a kind of a righteousness. sent11: the stillroom is not a kind of a tack. sent12: the Maalox is a intentionality. sent13: something is subsurface. sent14: The fact that the Yuan does not squire dimmer hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the dimmer does not tack is not wrong.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the dimmer is not a kind of a tack and it does not squire Yuan.; sent5 -> int2: that the dimmer does not tack and it does not squire Yuan is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dimmer does tack.; sent7 -> int5: if the dimmer is a tack then it does not scorch kernite and it is a kind of a intentionality.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the dimmer does not scorch kernite but it is a intentionality is false.
$hypothesis$ = that the dimmer does not scorch kernite and is a intentionality does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a kind of a intentionality if that it is a tack and it does not squire Yuan does not hold. sent2: if the gargoyle is polyatomic that the workroom does not tack and does not squire Yuan is wrong. sent3: the Maalox does tack if that the workroom is not a tack and does not squire Yuan is false. sent4: if something is a tack it does not scorch kernite. sent5: there is nothing such that it does not tack and does not squire Yuan. sent6: the dimmer does not scorch kernite. sent7: if something does tack it does not scorch kernite and it is a kind of a intentionality. sent8: the fact that the dimmer does not squire Yuan hold. sent9: that the dimmer does not scorch kernite and is a intentionality does not hold if the fact that the brooklime is a tack is not wrong. sent10: the dimmer is not a kind of a righteousness. sent11: the stillroom is not a kind of a tack. sent12: the Maalox is a intentionality. sent13: something is subsurface. sent14: The fact that the Yuan does not squire dimmer hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the dimmer does not tack is not wrong.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the dimmer is not a kind of a tack and it does not squire Yuan.; sent5 -> int2: that the dimmer does not tack and it does not squire Yuan is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the dimmer does tack.; sent7 -> int5: if the dimmer is a tack then it does not scorch kernite and it is a kind of a intentionality.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__