the congruousness occurs.
sent1: the frying occurs. sent2: if the fact that the no-hitter happens and the abusing pittance occurs is incorrect the no-hitter does not occur. sent3: that the no-hitter does not occur leads to that the non-institutionalness and the non-officialness occurs. sent4: if the bioelectricity does not occur then both the cartoon and the abusing oceanographer happens. sent5: the abusing speakerphone and the congruousness happens if the abusing oceanographer does not occur. sent6: the unserviceableness occurs. sent7: the fact that the no-hitter happens and the abusing pittance occurs is wrong if the lobarness does not occur. sent8: if the time does not occur the fact that the non-Sabineness and the sigmoidectomy happens is not correct. sent9: if the potlatch but not the official occurs then the peatiness does not occur. sent10: the cartooning does not occur if the fact that the abusing oceanographer occurs but the bioelectricity does not occur is not correct. sent11: if the cartoon occurs and the nominativeness occurs then the congruousness does not occur. sent12: if the wastefulness happens then the non-lobarness and the infection happens. sent13: the abusing oceanographer happens. sent14: if the nominative does not occur that the sigmoidectomy does not occur or the Sabineness occurs or both is wrong. sent15: if the frying occurs then the recombining does not occur and the fishtailing happens. sent16: if the peatiness does not occur the fact that the abusing oceanographer but not the bioelectricity occurs is not correct. sent17: the fact that the bioelectricity does not occur is not false. sent18: that the potlatch occurs is not wrong if the fact that the ladling raggedness does not occur or the homering happens or both is not correct. sent19: if the fishtailing happens the fact that either the ladling raggedness does not occur or the homering occurs or both is not true. sent20: that the cartoon does not occur results in the unserviceableness or that the nominative occurs or both. sent21: that the unserviceableness does not occur hold if the fact that the sigmoidectomy does not occur and/or the Sabineness occurs is not correct. sent22: that both the wastefulness and the voicing happens is triggered by that the sigmoidectomy does not occur. sent23: that the theophany does not occur if that either the non-testicularness or the workshop or both happens does not hold is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nominative does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the sigmoidectomy does not occur or the Sabineness occurs or both is incorrect hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the unserviceableness does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the nominativeness happens is true.; sent4 & sent17 -> int5: the cartooning and the abusing oceanographer occurs.; int5 -> int6: the cartoon happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the cartooning happens and the nominative occurs.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the congruousness occurs.
sent15 & sent1 -> int8: the fact that the recombining does not occur but the fishtailing occurs is right.; int8 -> int9: the fishtailing happens.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the fact that either the ladling raggedness does not occur or the homer occurs or both is incorrect.; sent18 & int10 -> int11: that the potlatch occurs is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the congruousness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the frying occurs. sent2: if the fact that the no-hitter happens and the abusing pittance occurs is incorrect the no-hitter does not occur. sent3: that the no-hitter does not occur leads to that the non-institutionalness and the non-officialness occurs. sent4: if the bioelectricity does not occur then both the cartoon and the abusing oceanographer happens. sent5: the abusing speakerphone and the congruousness happens if the abusing oceanographer does not occur. sent6: the unserviceableness occurs. sent7: the fact that the no-hitter happens and the abusing pittance occurs is wrong if the lobarness does not occur. sent8: if the time does not occur the fact that the non-Sabineness and the sigmoidectomy happens is not correct. sent9: if the potlatch but not the official occurs then the peatiness does not occur. sent10: the cartooning does not occur if the fact that the abusing oceanographer occurs but the bioelectricity does not occur is not correct. sent11: if the cartoon occurs and the nominativeness occurs then the congruousness does not occur. sent12: if the wastefulness happens then the non-lobarness and the infection happens. sent13: the abusing oceanographer happens. sent14: if the nominative does not occur that the sigmoidectomy does not occur or the Sabineness occurs or both is wrong. sent15: if the frying occurs then the recombining does not occur and the fishtailing happens. sent16: if the peatiness does not occur the fact that the abusing oceanographer but not the bioelectricity occurs is not correct. sent17: the fact that the bioelectricity does not occur is not false. sent18: that the potlatch occurs is not wrong if the fact that the ladling raggedness does not occur or the homering happens or both is not correct. sent19: if the fishtailing happens the fact that either the ladling raggedness does not occur or the homering occurs or both is not true. sent20: that the cartoon does not occur results in the unserviceableness or that the nominative occurs or both. sent21: that the unserviceableness does not occur hold if the fact that the sigmoidectomy does not occur and/or the Sabineness occurs is not correct. sent22: that both the wastefulness and the voicing happens is triggered by that the sigmoidectomy does not occur. sent23: that the theophany does not occur if that either the non-testicularness or the workshop or both happens does not hold is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nominative does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the sigmoidectomy does not occur or the Sabineness occurs or both is incorrect hold.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: the unserviceableness does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the nominativeness happens is true.; sent4 & sent17 -> int5: the cartooning and the abusing oceanographer occurs.; int5 -> int6: the cartoon happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the cartooning happens and the nominative occurs.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__