the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-uncleared thing that is not paramagnetic is false it is a NRC is false.
sent1: if the fact that something is not uncleared and is not paramagnetic is not correct it is a NRC. sent2: there exists something such that if it is non-uncleared thing that is not paramagnetic it is a NRC. sent3: that there is something such that if the fact that it is both not cleared and not paramagnetic is not right it is a kind of a NRC is not incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the result is both not paramagnetic and paid is wrong then it is a kind of a parallel. sent5: the result is paramagnetic if that it is not metaphysical and it is not a kwela is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that something is not generous and it is not a hawser is false it is wifely. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a charlock and is not a kind of a patrol is not correct it is a kind of a Caspian. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a padre and it is not Galwegian is incorrect it is a northerly. sent9: the result is a NRC if the fact that it is uncleared and it is not paramagnetic is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is paramagnetic hold it is a kind of a NRC. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is not incoherent and it is not a kind of a downtown is incorrect it is chorionic. sent12: that if the result is both not uncleared and not paramagnetic the result is a kind of a NRC is right. sent13: if something is not uncleared and it is not paramagnetic it is a NRC. sent14: the fact that the result is uncleared is not incorrect if that it is not reductionist and does not treble Whitmonday is incorrect. sent15: if the fact that something is uncleared but it is not paramagnetic does not hold it is a NRC. sent16: there exists something such that if it is paramagnetic then it is a NRC. sent17: if the result is paramagnetic then that it is a NRC is true. sent18: if that the procurer is not glad and it is not lossless does not hold it is paramagnetic.
sent1 -> int1: the result is a kind of a NRC if the fact that it is not uncleared and it is not paramagnetic is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-uncleared thing that is not paramagnetic is false it is a NRC is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not uncleared and is not paramagnetic is not correct it is a NRC. sent2: there exists something such that if it is non-uncleared thing that is not paramagnetic it is a NRC. sent3: that there is something such that if the fact that it is both not cleared and not paramagnetic is not right it is a kind of a NRC is not incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the result is both not paramagnetic and paid is wrong then it is a kind of a parallel. sent5: the result is paramagnetic if that it is not metaphysical and it is not a kwela is incorrect. sent6: if the fact that something is not generous and it is not a hawser is false it is wifely. sent7: if that something is not a kind of a charlock and is not a kind of a patrol is not correct it is a kind of a Caspian. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a padre and it is not Galwegian is incorrect it is a northerly. sent9: the result is a NRC if the fact that it is uncleared and it is not paramagnetic is not right. sent10: if the fact that something is paramagnetic hold it is a kind of a NRC. sent11: there is something such that if the fact that it is not incoherent and it is not a kind of a downtown is incorrect it is chorionic. sent12: that if the result is both not uncleared and not paramagnetic the result is a kind of a NRC is right. sent13: if something is not uncleared and it is not paramagnetic it is a NRC. sent14: the fact that the result is uncleared is not incorrect if that it is not reductionist and does not treble Whitmonday is incorrect. sent15: if the fact that something is uncleared but it is not paramagnetic does not hold it is a NRC. sent16: there exists something such that if it is paramagnetic then it is a NRC. sent17: if the result is paramagnetic then that it is a NRC is true. sent18: if that the procurer is not glad and it is not lossless does not hold it is paramagnetic. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the result is a kind of a NRC if the fact that it is not uncleared and it is not paramagnetic is false.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__