the outing does not occur.
sent1: if the tempest happens then that the mummifying and the non-Pakistaniness occurs is not right. sent2: the decimation occurs if the affiliation does not occur. sent3: the contextualness happens. sent4: if the mutagenicness happens the affiliation does not occur. sent5: if that the tempest but not the class occurs is incorrect then the fact that the stannicness happens is right. sent6: if the contextualness occurs the mummifying but not the Pakistani happens. sent7: both the scorching woman and the insectivorousness occurs. sent8: that the tempest does not occur leads to that the class does not occur. sent9: that the affiliation does not occur triggers that the decimation happens and the laugh happens. sent10: the mutagenicness but not the squiring melatonin happens. sent11: that the outness happens is triggered by that the class does not occur but the laughing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tempest happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the mummifying but not the Pakistaniness happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: both the mummifying and the non-Pakistaniness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tempest does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the class does not occur.; sent10 -> int6: the mutagenicness happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the affiliation does not occur.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the decimation and the laugh happens.; int8 -> int9: the laughing happens.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the class does not occur and the laugh happens.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the stannicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the outing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tempest happens then that the mummifying and the non-Pakistaniness occurs is not right. sent2: the decimation occurs if the affiliation does not occur. sent3: the contextualness happens. sent4: if the mutagenicness happens the affiliation does not occur. sent5: if that the tempest but not the class occurs is incorrect then the fact that the stannicness happens is right. sent6: if the contextualness occurs the mummifying but not the Pakistani happens. sent7: both the scorching woman and the insectivorousness occurs. sent8: that the tempest does not occur leads to that the class does not occur. sent9: that the affiliation does not occur triggers that the decimation happens and the laugh happens. sent10: the mutagenicness but not the squiring melatonin happens. sent11: that the outness happens is triggered by that the class does not occur but the laughing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tempest happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: that the mummifying but not the Pakistaniness happens is incorrect.; sent6 & sent3 -> int2: both the mummifying and the non-Pakistaniness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the tempest does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the class does not occur.; sent10 -> int6: the mutagenicness happens.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the affiliation does not occur.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the decimation and the laugh happens.; int8 -> int9: the laughing happens.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the class does not occur and the laugh happens.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__