the stockfish does not barrack yellowthroat.
sent1: if there is something such that it is inconstant the repatriate either does work throes or is inconstant or both. sent2: the mistflower is nascent. sent3: the mistflower is not a combretum if the polyandrist is both not a combretum and acidotic. sent4: if the mistflower does not barrack yellowthroat the stockfish is a kind of an overcharge. sent5: the counter is not nascent if the mistflower is painless and/or Sabbatarian. sent6: there is something such that it is inconstant. sent7: the counter is a robustness. sent8: if the repatriate is not painless then the mistflower is hydropathic. sent9: the repatriate is not hydropathic if the mistflower is an overcharge and/or not painful. sent10: the fact that either the counter is not a kind of a robustness or it is not nascent or both is wrong. sent11: the polyandrist is not a combretum and is acidotic if it is accessible. sent12: the stockfish is not nascent if the counter does barrack yellowthroat. sent13: if the baryon is not a Sabbatarian but it is hydropathic then the counter is a Sabbatarian. sent14: if something is painless it overcharges. sent15: if the fact that the counter is not a robustness or it is not nascent or both is false then the baryon is not a Sabbatarian. sent16: the mistflower is a kind of an overcharge if the fact that the baryon is not a Sabbatarian is not false. sent17: if the repatriate is not hydropathic then the stockfish barracks yellowthroat. sent18: the repatriate is not hydropathic if the mistflower is painless. sent19: if the fact that the counter is a kind of a robustness and/or it is not nascent does not hold the fact that the baryon is not a Sabbatarian hold. sent20: if the mistflower is not a combretum the baryon is non-Sabbatarian and is hydropathic. sent21: the stockfish is an overcharge. sent22: the counter does not barrack yellowthroat if the stockfish is nascent.
sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the baryon is not a kind of a Sabbatarian.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the mistflower does overcharge.; int2 -> int3: the mistflower is a kind of an overcharge or it is painless or both.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the repatriate is not hydropathic.; sent17 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the stockfish does not barrack yellowthroat.
sent14 -> int5: the counter is a kind of an overcharge if it is painless.; sent6 & sent1 -> int6: the repatriate does work throes and/or is inconstant.;
$hypothesis$ = the stockfish does not barrack yellowthroat. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is inconstant the repatriate either does work throes or is inconstant or both. sent2: the mistflower is nascent. sent3: the mistflower is not a combretum if the polyandrist is both not a combretum and acidotic. sent4: if the mistflower does not barrack yellowthroat the stockfish is a kind of an overcharge. sent5: the counter is not nascent if the mistflower is painless and/or Sabbatarian. sent6: there is something such that it is inconstant. sent7: the counter is a robustness. sent8: if the repatriate is not painless then the mistflower is hydropathic. sent9: the repatriate is not hydropathic if the mistflower is an overcharge and/or not painful. sent10: the fact that either the counter is not a kind of a robustness or it is not nascent or both is wrong. sent11: the polyandrist is not a combretum and is acidotic if it is accessible. sent12: the stockfish is not nascent if the counter does barrack yellowthroat. sent13: if the baryon is not a Sabbatarian but it is hydropathic then the counter is a Sabbatarian. sent14: if something is painless it overcharges. sent15: if the fact that the counter is not a robustness or it is not nascent or both is false then the baryon is not a Sabbatarian. sent16: the mistflower is a kind of an overcharge if the fact that the baryon is not a Sabbatarian is not false. sent17: if the repatriate is not hydropathic then the stockfish barracks yellowthroat. sent18: the repatriate is not hydropathic if the mistflower is painless. sent19: if the fact that the counter is a kind of a robustness and/or it is not nascent does not hold the fact that the baryon is not a Sabbatarian hold. sent20: if the mistflower is not a combretum the baryon is non-Sabbatarian and is hydropathic. sent21: the stockfish is an overcharge. sent22: the counter does not barrack yellowthroat if the stockfish is nascent. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the baryon is not a kind of a Sabbatarian.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the mistflower does overcharge.; int2 -> int3: the mistflower is a kind of an overcharge or it is painless or both.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the repatriate is not hydropathic.; sent17 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__