the blackout does not occur.
sent1: if the utilization occurs the rugby happens. sent2: that either the thunderbolt happens or the valvularness happens or both prevents that the determination occurs. sent3: the prejudging happens. sent4: the bocce does not occur. sent5: that both the shambles and the swallow occurs yields that the blackout does not occur. sent6: the exfoliation does not occur if the palatalizing erroneousness occurs and/or the sponsorship occurs. sent7: the swallowing happens. sent8: that the antisepticness does not occur and the hounding intermittence does not occur is not correct. sent9: the determination happens if the fact that the antisepticness does not occur and the hounding intermittence does not occur is false. sent10: if the bocce happens then both the non-valvularness and the determination occurs. sent11: either the self-renewal occurs or the lockup happens or both. sent12: the palatalizing erroneousness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the swallow occurs and the hounding intermittence occurs is false. sent14: the preclinicalness does not occur if the bocce does not occur and the thunderbolt does not occur. sent15: the impossible occurs or the backstopping freemasonry happens or both. sent16: the shambles occurs if the preclinicalness does not occur. sent17: the shambles does not occur if the hounding intermittence happens and/or the shambles does not occur. sent18: the invalid occurs. sent19: if the fact that the bocce does not occur and the determination does not occur is wrong then the fact that the valvularness does not occur is not false. sent20: the rationing and/or the backstopping horseback occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thunderbolt happens.; assump1 -> int1: the thunderbolt and/or the valvularness occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the determination does not occur.; sent9 & sent8 -> int3: the determination happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the thunderbolt does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the bocce does not occur and the thunderbolt does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the preclinicalness does not occur.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the shambles happens.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: both the shambles and the swallowing occurs.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the immunohistochemistry does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the blackout does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the utilization occurs the rugby happens. sent2: that either the thunderbolt happens or the valvularness happens or both prevents that the determination occurs. sent3: the prejudging happens. sent4: the bocce does not occur. sent5: that both the shambles and the swallow occurs yields that the blackout does not occur. sent6: the exfoliation does not occur if the palatalizing erroneousness occurs and/or the sponsorship occurs. sent7: the swallowing happens. sent8: that the antisepticness does not occur and the hounding intermittence does not occur is not correct. sent9: the determination happens if the fact that the antisepticness does not occur and the hounding intermittence does not occur is false. sent10: if the bocce happens then both the non-valvularness and the determination occurs. sent11: either the self-renewal occurs or the lockup happens or both. sent12: the palatalizing erroneousness does not occur. sent13: the fact that the swallow occurs and the hounding intermittence occurs is false. sent14: the preclinicalness does not occur if the bocce does not occur and the thunderbolt does not occur. sent15: the impossible occurs or the backstopping freemasonry happens or both. sent16: the shambles occurs if the preclinicalness does not occur. sent17: the shambles does not occur if the hounding intermittence happens and/or the shambles does not occur. sent18: the invalid occurs. sent19: if the fact that the bocce does not occur and the determination does not occur is wrong then the fact that the valvularness does not occur is not false. sent20: the rationing and/or the backstopping horseback occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thunderbolt happens.; assump1 -> int1: the thunderbolt and/or the valvularness occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the determination does not occur.; sent9 & sent8 -> int3: the determination happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the thunderbolt does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the bocce does not occur and the thunderbolt does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the preclinicalness does not occur.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the shambles happens.; int8 & sent7 -> int9: both the shambles and the swallowing occurs.; int9 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__