the earthworm is not a kind of a namby-pamby.
sent1: the jigsaw is prolusory and/or it ages cyproheptadine. sent2: if something is a kind of a stencil it demonstrates. sent3: if the enjoyer Romanizes the naiad does Romanizes. sent4: if the naiad is nonextant it is a kind of a ecarte. sent5: the naiad is not a kind of a thermoplastic. sent6: if there exists something such that it tweezes the fact that the enjoyer does not age Cretaceous and does not age indweller is false. sent7: the fact that the jigsaw is a parrotfish and does irradiate swatter does not hold. sent8: if that either something places or it does demonstrate or both is not right then the fact that it does not age indweller hold. sent9: if something does tweeze the fact that the jigsaw is non-prodromal thing that does not demonstrate is wrong. sent10: the naiad does not age indweller if that it is a Paraguayan and it is a stencil is not correct. sent11: if there exists something such that it irradiates swatter the fact that the jigsaw does not Romanize and it is not a parrotfish is not correct. sent12: if the jigsaw does not age cyproheptadine then the fact that that it does not tweeze and it is a placenta hold is wrong. sent13: the swatter does not stencil. sent14: if the fact that something does not tweeze and places is incorrect it is prodromal. sent15: if the naiad Romanizes then it ages Cretaceous and it is not prodromal. sent16: the jigsaw stencils if it is a parrotfish. sent17: if the naiad does not age indweller the enjoyer does not demonstrate and/or age indweller. sent18: the fact that that the naiad is a Paraguayan and it stencils hold is incorrect. sent19: if something does not age indweller it is a kind of a namby-pamby and it does age cyproheptadine. sent20: something ages cyproheptadine if that that it does not irradiate swatter and it does not Romanize is true is false. sent21: the fact that the jigsaw is a disfigurement and is catechetical is wrong. sent22: if the naiad ages Cretaceous and is not prodromal then that the earthworm does not tweeze is right. sent23: the earthworm is not a namby-pamby if the jigsaw is a kind of prodromal thing that ages Cretaceous. sent24: the naiad is Paraguayan if it is a parrotfish. sent25: the jigsaw does not age cyproheptadine if the enjoyer does not demonstrate and/or it does age indweller. sent26: the jigsaw does age indweller and it does place. sent27: if the fact that the jigsaw is a Paraguayan is not right then the naiad is a placenta or it is a Paraguayan or both. sent28: That the swatter irradiates swatter hold. sent29: that the swatter irradiates swatter hold.
sent10 & sent18 -> int1: the naiad does not age indweller.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the enjoyer does not demonstrate and/or it ages indweller.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the jigsaw does not age cyproheptadine.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: that the jigsaw does not tweeze and places is not true.; sent14 -> int5: the fact that the jigsaw is prodromal hold if the fact that it does not tweeze and it does place is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the jigsaw is prodromal.; sent29 -> int7: there is something such that it irradiates swatter.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that that the jigsaw does not Romanize and is not a parrotfish is not correct is correct.;
the fact that the earthworm is a namby-pamby is true.
sent19 -> int9: if the earthworm does not age indweller it is a namby-pamby and it ages cyproheptadine.; sent8 -> int10: if that either the earthworm does place or it demonstrates or both is not correct then the fact that it does not age indweller is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the earthworm is not a kind of a namby-pamby. ; $context$ = sent1: the jigsaw is prolusory and/or it ages cyproheptadine. sent2: if something is a kind of a stencil it demonstrates. sent3: if the enjoyer Romanizes the naiad does Romanizes. sent4: if the naiad is nonextant it is a kind of a ecarte. sent5: the naiad is not a kind of a thermoplastic. sent6: if there exists something such that it tweezes the fact that the enjoyer does not age Cretaceous and does not age indweller is false. sent7: the fact that the jigsaw is a parrotfish and does irradiate swatter does not hold. sent8: if that either something places or it does demonstrate or both is not right then the fact that it does not age indweller hold. sent9: if something does tweeze the fact that the jigsaw is non-prodromal thing that does not demonstrate is wrong. sent10: the naiad does not age indweller if that it is a Paraguayan and it is a stencil is not correct. sent11: if there exists something such that it irradiates swatter the fact that the jigsaw does not Romanize and it is not a parrotfish is not correct. sent12: if the jigsaw does not age cyproheptadine then the fact that that it does not tweeze and it is a placenta hold is wrong. sent13: the swatter does not stencil. sent14: if the fact that something does not tweeze and places is incorrect it is prodromal. sent15: if the naiad Romanizes then it ages Cretaceous and it is not prodromal. sent16: the jigsaw stencils if it is a parrotfish. sent17: if the naiad does not age indweller the enjoyer does not demonstrate and/or age indweller. sent18: the fact that that the naiad is a Paraguayan and it stencils hold is incorrect. sent19: if something does not age indweller it is a kind of a namby-pamby and it does age cyproheptadine. sent20: something ages cyproheptadine if that that it does not irradiate swatter and it does not Romanize is true is false. sent21: the fact that the jigsaw is a disfigurement and is catechetical is wrong. sent22: if the naiad ages Cretaceous and is not prodromal then that the earthworm does not tweeze is right. sent23: the earthworm is not a namby-pamby if the jigsaw is a kind of prodromal thing that ages Cretaceous. sent24: the naiad is Paraguayan if it is a parrotfish. sent25: the jigsaw does not age cyproheptadine if the enjoyer does not demonstrate and/or it does age indweller. sent26: the jigsaw does age indweller and it does place. sent27: if the fact that the jigsaw is a Paraguayan is not right then the naiad is a placenta or it is a Paraguayan or both. sent28: That the swatter irradiates swatter hold. sent29: that the swatter irradiates swatter hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent18 -> int1: the naiad does not age indweller.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the enjoyer does not demonstrate and/or it ages indweller.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the jigsaw does not age cyproheptadine.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: that the jigsaw does not tweeze and places is not true.; sent14 -> int5: the fact that the jigsaw is prodromal hold if the fact that it does not tweeze and it does place is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the jigsaw is prodromal.; sent29 -> int7: there is something such that it irradiates swatter.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: that that the jigsaw does not Romanize and is not a parrotfish is not correct is correct.; __UNKNOWN__