the fact that there is something such that if it is a zooid the fact that it is a kind of woven thing that does not determine is not true is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not administer estuary is not true then the fact that it is not a merchant and it is not microbial is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a zooid then the fact that it is a kind of unwoven thing that does not determine is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is a zooid then it is not unwoven and it does not determine. sent4: the prune is not unwoven and does not determine if it is a zooid. sent5: that something is not a constructivist and does not administer Robeson does not hold if it does determine. sent6: if the prune is a zooid the fact that it is a kind of unwoven thing that does not determine is not true. sent7: the fact that the fact that the prune does not homestead metaknowledge and does quieten pachyderm is not wrong does not hold if it is a zooid. sent8: there exists something such that if it is animating then the fact that it is not a merchant and does not homestead zoom is wrong. sent9: that the prune is a kind of woven thing that determines is not true if it is a zooid. sent10: that the prune is a kind of woven thing that does not determine is not correct if it is a kind of a zooid. sent11: there is something such that if that it is a zooid is not false the fact that it is not unwoven and it determines is false.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the Stentor does determine then the fact that it is not a kind of a constructivist and it does not administer Robeson is not right.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a zooid the fact that it is a kind of woven thing that does not determine is not true is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if that it does not administer estuary is not true then the fact that it is not a merchant and it is not microbial is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a zooid then the fact that it is a kind of unwoven thing that does not determine is not right. sent3: there is something such that if it is a zooid then it is not unwoven and it does not determine. sent4: the prune is not unwoven and does not determine if it is a zooid. sent5: that something is not a constructivist and does not administer Robeson does not hold if it does determine. sent6: if the prune is a zooid the fact that it is a kind of unwoven thing that does not determine is not true. sent7: the fact that the fact that the prune does not homestead metaknowledge and does quieten pachyderm is not wrong does not hold if it is a zooid. sent8: there exists something such that if it is animating then the fact that it is not a merchant and does not homestead zoom is wrong. sent9: that the prune is a kind of woven thing that determines is not true if it is a zooid. sent10: that the prune is a kind of woven thing that does not determine is not correct if it is a kind of a zooid. sent11: there is something such that if that it is a zooid is not false the fact that it is not unwoven and it determines is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__