the capulin is not ripe.
sent1: the raglan does not contemplate aerial if the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial. sent2: if the mimeograph is not collegial and pushes scriptwriter then the raglan contemplates aerial. sent3: the fact that the raglan does not push Smalley and does push scriptwriter is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a headshake is right. sent4: if something does not push Smalley then that it does not contemplate aerial and does not push scriptwriter is wrong. sent5: the capulin does not straighten Agamidae and does not jet. sent6: the fact that the raglan does not contemplate aerial and does push scriptwriter is correct if the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial. sent7: that the mimeograph is collegial but it is not a kind of a Hyperoodon is incorrect. sent8: the fact that something is not a jetting and not a headshake does not hold if it straightens Selkirk. sent9: the raglan is not a headshake if the fact that the fact that the crocus is not a jetting and is not a kind of a headshake hold is false. sent10: if the raglan does not contemplate aerial and does push scriptwriter then the capulin is ripe. sent11: that if there is something such that it is ripe that the mimeograph does contemplate aerial and it is collegial does not hold is not wrong. sent12: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it does contemplate aerial and it is collegial is incorrect the flyleaf is not collegial is not incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it either contemplates kip or does not sauce or both is not correct then the crocus does straighten Selkirk. sent14: that the mimeograph is not collegial and it is not a kind of a Hyperoodon is not true. sent15: if the fact that something does not push Smalley but it does push scriptwriter is not correct it is ripe. sent16: if that the mimeograph is not collegial and it is not a Hyperoodon is false then that it does not contemplate aerial is true. sent17: if the raglan does not straighten Agamidae and does push Smalley the mimeograph does not push Smalley. sent18: if something does not straighten Agamidae then it is not a headshake. sent19: the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial if it is collegial. sent20: there exists something such that that it either does contemplate kip or is not a sauce or both is false. sent21: the fact that the hack is not a Hyperoodon and it is not a kind of a Wurzburg is incorrect. sent22: the raglan does not contemplate aerial.
sent16 & sent14 -> int1: the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the raglan does not contemplate aerial and does push scriptwriter is not wrong.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the flyleaf is not collegial is correct.
sent15 -> int3: the raglan is ripe if that it does not push Smalley and it does push scriptwriter is false.; sent18 -> int4: that the capulin is not a headshake hold if it does not straighten Agamidae.; sent5 -> int5: the capulin does not straighten Agamidae.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the capulin is not a headshake.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a headshake hold.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: that the raglan does not push Smalley but it pushes scriptwriter is not true.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the raglan is ripe.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it is ripe.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the fact that the mimeograph contemplates aerial and it is collegial does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it does contemplate aerial and it is collegial is not true.; int12 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the capulin is not ripe. ; $context$ = sent1: the raglan does not contemplate aerial if the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial. sent2: if the mimeograph is not collegial and pushes scriptwriter then the raglan contemplates aerial. sent3: the fact that the raglan does not push Smalley and does push scriptwriter is wrong if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a headshake is right. sent4: if something does not push Smalley then that it does not contemplate aerial and does not push scriptwriter is wrong. sent5: the capulin does not straighten Agamidae and does not jet. sent6: the fact that the raglan does not contemplate aerial and does push scriptwriter is correct if the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial. sent7: that the mimeograph is collegial but it is not a kind of a Hyperoodon is incorrect. sent8: the fact that something is not a jetting and not a headshake does not hold if it straightens Selkirk. sent9: the raglan is not a headshake if the fact that the fact that the crocus is not a jetting and is not a kind of a headshake hold is false. sent10: if the raglan does not contemplate aerial and does push scriptwriter then the capulin is ripe. sent11: that if there is something such that it is ripe that the mimeograph does contemplate aerial and it is collegial does not hold is not wrong. sent12: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it does contemplate aerial and it is collegial is incorrect the flyleaf is not collegial is not incorrect. sent13: if there exists something such that the fact that it either contemplates kip or does not sauce or both is not correct then the crocus does straighten Selkirk. sent14: that the mimeograph is not collegial and it is not a kind of a Hyperoodon is not true. sent15: if the fact that something does not push Smalley but it does push scriptwriter is not correct it is ripe. sent16: if that the mimeograph is not collegial and it is not a Hyperoodon is false then that it does not contemplate aerial is true. sent17: if the raglan does not straighten Agamidae and does push Smalley the mimeograph does not push Smalley. sent18: if something does not straighten Agamidae then it is not a headshake. sent19: the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial if it is collegial. sent20: there exists something such that that it either does contemplate kip or is not a sauce or both is false. sent21: the fact that the hack is not a Hyperoodon and it is not a kind of a Wurzburg is incorrect. sent22: the raglan does not contemplate aerial. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent14 -> int1: the mimeograph does not contemplate aerial.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the raglan does not contemplate aerial and does push scriptwriter is not wrong.; sent10 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__