the streusel is a kind of a forger.
sent1: the cattleman is insular if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-empirical thing that is a cyclooxygenase-1 is not true. sent2: the streusel is a homogeny. sent3: the streusel is a cyclooxygenase-1. sent4: the cattleman is not insular. sent5: the cattleman is a deep-sea if it is not aerophilatelic. sent6: the cattleman is a kind of a xerophyte if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a forger but insular does not hold. sent7: that the warship is a cyclooxygenase-1 is not incorrect. sent8: something is not insular if that it is both a homogeny and not insular is not correct. sent9: if something is a xerophyte then it is a forger. sent10: that something is not a homogeny and is not insular is wrong if it is not a kind of a xerophyte. sent11: if the streusel is not empirical it is a kind of a homogeny and it is a kind of a xerophyte. sent12: if the fact that the cattleman is not a homogeny is not false the fact that it is insular is true. sent13: if the pruner is not a kind of a sneeze that it is insular is not false. sent14: that the streusel is not a kind of a xerophyte and is Eucharistic does not hold. sent15: the streusel is a xerophyte if something is not a kind of a homogeny. sent16: if the streusel is not multilevel then it is not an encore and not eponymous. sent17: that the streusel is not a kind of a clabber but it is a deep-sea is not true. sent18: if something that is not an encore is not eponymous then it is not a xerophyte.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the streusel is not empirical but it is a kind of a cyclooxygenase-1 is incorrect is true.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is both not empirical and a cyclooxygenase-1 does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the cattleman is insular.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the streusel is both not empirical and a cyclooxygenase-1.; int4 -> int5: the streusel is not empirical.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the streusel is a homogeny and it is a xerophyte.; int6 -> int7: the streusel is a kind of a xerophyte.; sent9 -> int8: if the streusel is a kind of a xerophyte then it is a kind of a forger.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the sorting is not insular.
sent8 -> int9: if that the sorting is both a homogeny and insular does not hold it is not insular.;
$hypothesis$ = the streusel is a kind of a forger. ; $context$ = sent1: the cattleman is insular if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-empirical thing that is a cyclooxygenase-1 is not true. sent2: the streusel is a homogeny. sent3: the streusel is a cyclooxygenase-1. sent4: the cattleman is not insular. sent5: the cattleman is a deep-sea if it is not aerophilatelic. sent6: the cattleman is a kind of a xerophyte if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a forger but insular does not hold. sent7: that the warship is a cyclooxygenase-1 is not incorrect. sent8: something is not insular if that it is both a homogeny and not insular is not correct. sent9: if something is a xerophyte then it is a forger. sent10: that something is not a homogeny and is not insular is wrong if it is not a kind of a xerophyte. sent11: if the streusel is not empirical it is a kind of a homogeny and it is a kind of a xerophyte. sent12: if the fact that the cattleman is not a homogeny is not false the fact that it is insular is true. sent13: if the pruner is not a kind of a sneeze that it is insular is not false. sent14: that the streusel is not a kind of a xerophyte and is Eucharistic does not hold. sent15: the streusel is a xerophyte if something is not a kind of a homogeny. sent16: if the streusel is not multilevel then it is not an encore and not eponymous. sent17: that the streusel is not a kind of a clabber but it is a deep-sea is not true. sent18: if something that is not an encore is not eponymous then it is not a xerophyte. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the streusel is not empirical but it is a kind of a cyclooxygenase-1 is incorrect is true.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is both not empirical and a cyclooxygenase-1 does not hold.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the cattleman is insular.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the streusel is both not empirical and a cyclooxygenase-1.; int4 -> int5: the streusel is not empirical.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the streusel is a homogeny and it is a xerophyte.; int6 -> int7: the streusel is a kind of a xerophyte.; sent9 -> int8: if the streusel is a kind of a xerophyte then it is a kind of a forger.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__