that the gray is not undemonstrative hold.
sent1: the gray is synoptic. sent2: the gray is not undemonstrative if that the poseuse predestines CV but it is not undemonstrative is incorrect. sent3: if the impurity is traditional thing that is untraceable then the poseuse does not vacuum. sent4: the Ostrogoth is a Ahriman if the applecart does not add. sent5: if something is a Ahriman but it is traceable then it is traditional. sent6: the impurity is traditional and it is not traceable. sent7: the Ostrogoth is a kind of a Ahriman if the applecart is a Ahriman. sent8: the poseuse does not predestine CV if that the gray is not a sour or it is not synoptic or both is not true. sent9: if something is not a vacuum that it does not predestine CV is wrong. sent10: the fact that the gray is not sour or not synoptic or both is wrong if it is not undemonstrative. sent11: the corespondent is a Mohorovicic. sent12: the corespondent does guggle bootlegger if the cruse is not a submersible and it is not a antiphony. sent13: the Ostrogoth is traceable if there is something such that it does guggle bootlegger and is a kind of a Mohorovicic. sent14: either the applecart is a Ahriman or it does not add or both if something does not add. sent15: if the fact that the turnstile vacuums but it is not traditional is not correct the impurity does not predestine CV. sent16: the cruse is both not submersible and not a antiphony. sent17: the ancestress does not add. sent18: if the gray is not undemonstrative it is synoptic. sent19: the Nevadan does predestine CV.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gray is undemonstrative does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the gray is not a kind of a sour and/or is not synoptic does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the poseuse does not predestine CV.; sent9 -> int3: the poseuse predestines CV if it is not a vacuum.; sent3 & sent6 -> int4: the poseuse is not a vacuum.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the poseuse predestines CV.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the gray is demonstrative.
sent5 -> int7: if the Ostrogoth is a Ahriman but not untraceable it is traditional.; sent17 -> int8: there is something such that the fact that it does not add hold.; int8 & sent14 -> int9: the applecart is a kind of a Ahriman and/or it does not add.; int9 & sent7 & sent4 -> int10: the Ostrogoth is a Ahriman.; sent12 & sent16 -> int11: the corespondent does guggle bootlegger.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the corespondent guggles bootlegger and it is a Mohorovicic.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it does guggle bootlegger and it is a Mohorovicic.; int13 & sent13 -> int14: that the Ostrogoth is not untraceable is not wrong.; int10 & int14 -> int15: the Ostrogoth is a Ahriman but it is not untraceable.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the Ostrogoth is traditional.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is not nontraditional.;
$hypothesis$ = that the gray is not undemonstrative hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the gray is synoptic. sent2: the gray is not undemonstrative if that the poseuse predestines CV but it is not undemonstrative is incorrect. sent3: if the impurity is traditional thing that is untraceable then the poseuse does not vacuum. sent4: the Ostrogoth is a Ahriman if the applecart does not add. sent5: if something is a Ahriman but it is traceable then it is traditional. sent6: the impurity is traditional and it is not traceable. sent7: the Ostrogoth is a kind of a Ahriman if the applecart is a Ahriman. sent8: the poseuse does not predestine CV if that the gray is not a sour or it is not synoptic or both is not true. sent9: if something is not a vacuum that it does not predestine CV is wrong. sent10: the fact that the gray is not sour or not synoptic or both is wrong if it is not undemonstrative. sent11: the corespondent is a Mohorovicic. sent12: the corespondent does guggle bootlegger if the cruse is not a submersible and it is not a antiphony. sent13: the Ostrogoth is traceable if there is something such that it does guggle bootlegger and is a kind of a Mohorovicic. sent14: either the applecart is a Ahriman or it does not add or both if something does not add. sent15: if the fact that the turnstile vacuums but it is not traditional is not correct the impurity does not predestine CV. sent16: the cruse is both not submersible and not a antiphony. sent17: the ancestress does not add. sent18: if the gray is not undemonstrative it is synoptic. sent19: the Nevadan does predestine CV. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the gray is undemonstrative does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the gray is not a kind of a sour and/or is not synoptic does not hold.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the poseuse does not predestine CV.; sent9 -> int3: the poseuse predestines CV if it is not a vacuum.; sent3 & sent6 -> int4: the poseuse is not a vacuum.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the poseuse predestines CV.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__