the charming origanum occurs.
sent1: the pragmatics does not occur if the fact that the TURP happens and the snagging armor does not occur does not hold. sent2: not the discriminating but the charming counterdemonstration happens. sent3: if the charming counterdemonstration does not occur the discriminateness occurs and the colonialism occurs. sent4: if the handstand does not occur but the blackmail happens then the ricing colloquy happens. sent5: if that the understanding does not occur and the ricing Manihot does not occur does not hold the charming counterdemonstration does not occur. sent6: the charming counterdemonstration occurs. sent7: that both the sundering and the malarialness occurs yields the non-thermodynamicsness. sent8: if the discriminating happens then that the harassment does not occur and the ricing dimer does not occur is not true. sent9: the silt occurs. sent10: the ricing dimer occurs. sent11: the fact that not the colonialism but the harassment occurs is wrong. sent12: the non-pragmaticsness leads to that the rejectiveness happens and/or the bibliolatry occurs. sent13: if the Turkmen does not occur the fact that that the understanding does not occur and the ricing Manihot does not occur hold is incorrect. sent14: the malarialness occurs if the electronicsness happens. sent15: both the snagging bonnet and the ravage happens if the electronicsness does not occur. sent16: if the discriminating does not occur the thermodynamicsness and the ricing dimer occurs. sent17: that the sundering does not occur is prevented by the harassment. sent18: the charming origanum is prevented by that both the non-electronicsness and the malarialness happens. sent19: if the ricing colloquy happens then the fact that the TURP occurs but the snagging armor does not occur is not true. sent20: the handstand does not occur. sent21: the ricing dimer happens if the discriminateness does not occur. sent22: if the ravage happens then the charming origanum happens. sent23: that the colonialism does not occur and the harassment does not occur is not correct. sent24: the snagging bonnet happens. sent25: the Turkmen does not occur if the fact that the rejectiveness happens is not wrong. sent26: if that the harassment does not occur and the ricing dimer does not occur is not right then the ricing dimer occurs. sent27: the fact that the blackmailing occurs is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the electronicsness occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the malarialness occurs.; sent2 -> int2: the discriminateness does not occur.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the thermodynamicsness and the ricing dimer occurs.; int3 -> int4: the thermodynamicsness happens.;
the fact that the charming origanum does not occur is right.
sent20 & sent27 -> int5: the handstand does not occur and the blackmailing happens.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the ricing colloquy occurs.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: that the TURP happens and the snagging armor does not occur does not hold.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the pragmaticsness does not occur.; sent12 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the rejectiveness happens or the bibliolatry occurs or both is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the charming origanum occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the pragmatics does not occur if the fact that the TURP happens and the snagging armor does not occur does not hold. sent2: not the discriminating but the charming counterdemonstration happens. sent3: if the charming counterdemonstration does not occur the discriminateness occurs and the colonialism occurs. sent4: if the handstand does not occur but the blackmail happens then the ricing colloquy happens. sent5: if that the understanding does not occur and the ricing Manihot does not occur does not hold the charming counterdemonstration does not occur. sent6: the charming counterdemonstration occurs. sent7: that both the sundering and the malarialness occurs yields the non-thermodynamicsness. sent8: if the discriminating happens then that the harassment does not occur and the ricing dimer does not occur is not true. sent9: the silt occurs. sent10: the ricing dimer occurs. sent11: the fact that not the colonialism but the harassment occurs is wrong. sent12: the non-pragmaticsness leads to that the rejectiveness happens and/or the bibliolatry occurs. sent13: if the Turkmen does not occur the fact that that the understanding does not occur and the ricing Manihot does not occur hold is incorrect. sent14: the malarialness occurs if the electronicsness happens. sent15: both the snagging bonnet and the ravage happens if the electronicsness does not occur. sent16: if the discriminating does not occur the thermodynamicsness and the ricing dimer occurs. sent17: that the sundering does not occur is prevented by the harassment. sent18: the charming origanum is prevented by that both the non-electronicsness and the malarialness happens. sent19: if the ricing colloquy happens then the fact that the TURP occurs but the snagging armor does not occur is not true. sent20: the handstand does not occur. sent21: the ricing dimer happens if the discriminateness does not occur. sent22: if the ravage happens then the charming origanum happens. sent23: that the colonialism does not occur and the harassment does not occur is not correct. sent24: the snagging bonnet happens. sent25: the Turkmen does not occur if the fact that the rejectiveness happens is not wrong. sent26: if that the harassment does not occur and the ricing dimer does not occur is not right then the ricing dimer occurs. sent27: the fact that the blackmailing occurs is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the electronicsness occurs.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the malarialness occurs.; sent2 -> int2: the discriminateness does not occur.; sent16 & int2 -> int3: the thermodynamicsness and the ricing dimer occurs.; int3 -> int4: the thermodynamicsness happens.; __UNKNOWN__