the fact that if the supernatant is basiscopic the myelin is anaphrodisiac is not true.
sent1: if the fact that the myelin is both worsted and coarse is false the supernatant is not basiscopic. sent2: the supernatant is not anaphrodisiac. sent3: that something is both a attosecond and coarse is not right if it is not a druidism. sent4: that the myelin is anaphrodisiac and it is basiscopic does not hold if the fact that it is not coarse is true. sent5: the myelin is not anaphrodisiac if that the supernatant is a kind of basiscopic thing that is a worsted is wrong. sent6: the fact that the pyralid is a kind of a ayah and is anaphrodisiac is incorrect. sent7: that the myelin smashes and is a salted is incorrect if it is unpermissive. sent8: if the supernatant is not a worsted the fact that it is anaphrodisiac and it is basiscopic is not correct. sent9: the myelin is not basiscopic if the fact that the supernatant does worst and it is anaphrodisiac is not right. sent10: the myelin is not a druidism. sent11: that the dipper is a kind of a Scythian and it is coarse does not hold. sent12: if the myelin is not anaphrodisiac the fact that it is worsted and it is coarse is not true. sent13: the supernatant is coarse if the myelin is basiscopic. sent14: if the myelin is basiscopic then that it is anaphrodisiac but not non-coarse does not hold. sent15: the supernatant is a worsted.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supernatant is basiscopic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the myelin is non-anaphrodisiac.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: that that the myelin is a worsted and is coarse does not hold is not incorrect.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the supernatant is not basiscopic.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the myelin is anaphrodisiac.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tableware is a kind of a attosecond that is coarse does not hold if it is not a druidism.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the supernatant is basiscopic the myelin is anaphrodisiac is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the myelin is both worsted and coarse is false the supernatant is not basiscopic. sent2: the supernatant is not anaphrodisiac. sent3: that something is both a attosecond and coarse is not right if it is not a druidism. sent4: that the myelin is anaphrodisiac and it is basiscopic does not hold if the fact that it is not coarse is true. sent5: the myelin is not anaphrodisiac if that the supernatant is a kind of basiscopic thing that is a worsted is wrong. sent6: the fact that the pyralid is a kind of a ayah and is anaphrodisiac is incorrect. sent7: that the myelin smashes and is a salted is incorrect if it is unpermissive. sent8: if the supernatant is not a worsted the fact that it is anaphrodisiac and it is basiscopic is not correct. sent9: the myelin is not basiscopic if the fact that the supernatant does worst and it is anaphrodisiac is not right. sent10: the myelin is not a druidism. sent11: that the dipper is a kind of a Scythian and it is coarse does not hold. sent12: if the myelin is not anaphrodisiac the fact that it is worsted and it is coarse is not true. sent13: the supernatant is coarse if the myelin is basiscopic. sent14: if the myelin is basiscopic then that it is anaphrodisiac but not non-coarse does not hold. sent15: the supernatant is a worsted. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the supernatant is basiscopic.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the myelin is non-anaphrodisiac.; sent12 & assump2 -> int1: that that the myelin is a worsted and is coarse does not hold is not incorrect.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the supernatant is not basiscopic.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the myelin is anaphrodisiac.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__