the gaur is not a fourteenth and does slice outwardness.
sent1: the jam does not mint arthrogram and is not bacteriophagic if the gaur is not bacteriophagic. sent2: that the hardliner is a kind of non-progressive thing that is pedunculate is not wrong. sent3: the jam does not mint arthrogram. sent4: the hardliner is not a pannier if it is not a kind of a progressive and it is pedunculate. sent5: if the gaur is topping thing that is bacteriophagic then the jam is not a kind of a fourteenth. sent6: if the showpiece is not a kind of a progressive the fact that the strawman is chirpy but it is not a pannier is wrong. sent7: the gaur is not a fourteenth if that the doodad is not a fourteenth and is analytic is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a pannier that it is chirpy and it is a homophobe is not right. sent9: if the strawman does not mint arthrogram then the fact that the doodad is not a fourteenth but analytic is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that that it is pedunculate hold. sent11: the showpiece is not a kind of a progressive. sent12: that something is non-topping thing that is bacteriophagic does not hold if it does clout. sent13: the jam is concretistic and it is a homophobe if something is pedunculate. sent14: if the doodad is not topping the strawman is a clout and analytic. sent15: the gaur is not a fourteenth. sent16: the showpiece is concretistic if there is something such that the fact that it is chirpy and it is a homophobe does not hold. sent17: something does not mint arthrogram if that it is chirpy and it is not a pannier is not right. sent18: if there exists something such that it does not mint arthrogram and is not bacteriophagic then the doodad is not a topping. sent19: the showpiece is not concretistic if the strawman clouts and it is analytic. sent20: the hardliner is not a fourteenth if the jam mints arthrogram and it is pedunculate. sent21: if something is concretistic it clouts. sent22: if the gaur is not a fourteenth but it does slice outwardness it is not bacteriophagic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaur is not a fourteenth and slices outwardness.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the gaur is not bacteriophagic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the jam does not mint arthrogram and is not bacteriophagic.; int2 -> int3: something does not mint arthrogram and it is not bacteriophagic.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the fact that the doodad does not top hold.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the strawman does clout and it is analytic.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the showpiece is not concretistic.; sent8 -> int7: that the hardliner is chirpy and a homophobe is false if it is not a pannier.; sent4 & sent2 -> int8: the hardliner is not a pannier.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the fact that the hardliner is chirpy thing that is a kind of a homophobe is not correct is true.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is a kind of chirpy thing that is a kind of a homophobe is not true.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the showpiece is concretistic.; int6 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis;
the gaur is not a fourteenth but it does slice outwardness.
sent17 -> int13: the strawman does not mint arthrogram if that it is chirpy and it is not a kind of a pannier is not correct.; sent6 & sent11 -> int14: the fact that the strawman is chirpy but it is not a kind of a pannier is wrong.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the strawman does not mint arthrogram.; sent9 & int15 -> int16: that the doodad is both not a fourteenth and analytic does not hold.; sent7 & int16 -> int17: the gaur is not a fourteenth.; sent12 -> int18: if the jam does clout that it is a kind of non-topping thing that is bacteriophagic does not hold.; sent21 -> int19: if the jam is concretistic it is a clout.; sent10 & sent13 -> int20: the jam is concretistic and it is a homophobe.; int20 -> int21: the fact that the jam is concretistic hold.; int19 & int21 -> int22: the jam is a clout.; int18 & int22 -> int23: that the jam is not a topping but it is bacteriophagic does not hold.; int23 -> int24: there is something such that the fact that that it is both not a topping and bacteriophagic is correct does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the gaur is not a fourteenth and does slice outwardness. ; $context$ = sent1: the jam does not mint arthrogram and is not bacteriophagic if the gaur is not bacteriophagic. sent2: that the hardliner is a kind of non-progressive thing that is pedunculate is not wrong. sent3: the jam does not mint arthrogram. sent4: the hardliner is not a pannier if it is not a kind of a progressive and it is pedunculate. sent5: if the gaur is topping thing that is bacteriophagic then the jam is not a kind of a fourteenth. sent6: if the showpiece is not a kind of a progressive the fact that the strawman is chirpy but it is not a pannier is wrong. sent7: the gaur is not a fourteenth if that the doodad is not a fourteenth and is analytic is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a pannier that it is chirpy and it is a homophobe is not right. sent9: if the strawman does not mint arthrogram then the fact that the doodad is not a fourteenth but analytic is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that that it is pedunculate hold. sent11: the showpiece is not a kind of a progressive. sent12: that something is non-topping thing that is bacteriophagic does not hold if it does clout. sent13: the jam is concretistic and it is a homophobe if something is pedunculate. sent14: if the doodad is not topping the strawman is a clout and analytic. sent15: the gaur is not a fourteenth. sent16: the showpiece is concretistic if there is something such that the fact that it is chirpy and it is a homophobe does not hold. sent17: something does not mint arthrogram if that it is chirpy and it is not a pannier is not right. sent18: if there exists something such that it does not mint arthrogram and is not bacteriophagic then the doodad is not a topping. sent19: the showpiece is not concretistic if the strawman clouts and it is analytic. sent20: the hardliner is not a fourteenth if the jam mints arthrogram and it is pedunculate. sent21: if something is concretistic it clouts. sent22: if the gaur is not a fourteenth but it does slice outwardness it is not bacteriophagic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gaur is not a fourteenth and slices outwardness.; sent22 & assump1 -> int1: the gaur is not bacteriophagic.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the jam does not mint arthrogram and is not bacteriophagic.; int2 -> int3: something does not mint arthrogram and it is not bacteriophagic.; int3 & sent18 -> int4: the fact that the doodad does not top hold.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the strawman does clout and it is analytic.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the showpiece is not concretistic.; sent8 -> int7: that the hardliner is chirpy and a homophobe is false if it is not a pannier.; sent4 & sent2 -> int8: the hardliner is not a pannier.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that the fact that the hardliner is chirpy thing that is a kind of a homophobe is not correct is true.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is a kind of chirpy thing that is a kind of a homophobe is not true.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the showpiece is concretistic.; int6 & int11 -> int12: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__