that the journey happens is not incorrect.
sent1: that the babel does not occur and the miscounting does not occur brings about the journey. sent2: the fact that the discordantness occurs and the lumbarness does not occur is not right if the favor occurs. sent3: the interjection does not occur. sent4: that the babel does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the life-supportness occurs and the queening skyrocket does not occur is incorrect. sent5: that the journey but not the life-supportness happens is not true if the queening skyrocket does not occur. sent6: the fact that the journey does not occur is correct if the fact that the journey but not the life-supportness happens does not hold. sent7: the tracing stalemate does not occur and the interjection does not occur. sent8: both the guaranteeing ambusher and the pronounceableness occurs. sent9: that not the flail but the riding occurs is wrong. sent10: that the journey does not occur is triggered by that the guaranteeing ambusher but not the rustication occurs. sent11: the fact that the toilet happens and the swiping does not occur does not hold if the kickoff occurs. sent12: the entreaty does not occur if the fact that the flail does not occur but the riding happens does not hold. sent13: the unpronounceableness is brought about by that the flail and the riding happens. sent14: that the fact that the pandemic and the appearance occurs is not true if the hitching does not occur is right. sent15: the fact that the trespass but not the queening Vermeer occurs is not correct. sent16: that the rustication happens and the guaranteeing ambusher occurs prevents that the miscounting happens. sent17: that the life-supportness but not the queening skyrocket happens does not hold if the entreaty does not occur. sent18: the kickoff does not occur and the entreaty occurs if the pronounceableness does not occur. sent19: that the guaranteeing ambusher does not occur yields that the nonoperationalness and the rustication occurs. sent20: that the rustication does not occur brings about that the toilet but not the swiping happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rustication does not occur.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the toilet occurs but the swiping does not occur.; sent8 -> int2: the guaranteeing ambusher happens.; sent12 & sent9 -> int3: the entreaty does not occur.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the life-supportness but not the queening skyrocket happens is false.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the babel does not occur.;
the nonoperationalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the journey happens is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the babel does not occur and the miscounting does not occur brings about the journey. sent2: the fact that the discordantness occurs and the lumbarness does not occur is not right if the favor occurs. sent3: the interjection does not occur. sent4: that the babel does not occur is not wrong if the fact that the life-supportness occurs and the queening skyrocket does not occur is incorrect. sent5: that the journey but not the life-supportness happens is not true if the queening skyrocket does not occur. sent6: the fact that the journey does not occur is correct if the fact that the journey but not the life-supportness happens does not hold. sent7: the tracing stalemate does not occur and the interjection does not occur. sent8: both the guaranteeing ambusher and the pronounceableness occurs. sent9: that not the flail but the riding occurs is wrong. sent10: that the journey does not occur is triggered by that the guaranteeing ambusher but not the rustication occurs. sent11: the fact that the toilet happens and the swiping does not occur does not hold if the kickoff occurs. sent12: the entreaty does not occur if the fact that the flail does not occur but the riding happens does not hold. sent13: the unpronounceableness is brought about by that the flail and the riding happens. sent14: that the fact that the pandemic and the appearance occurs is not true if the hitching does not occur is right. sent15: the fact that the trespass but not the queening Vermeer occurs is not correct. sent16: that the rustication happens and the guaranteeing ambusher occurs prevents that the miscounting happens. sent17: that the life-supportness but not the queening skyrocket happens does not hold if the entreaty does not occur. sent18: the kickoff does not occur and the entreaty occurs if the pronounceableness does not occur. sent19: that the guaranteeing ambusher does not occur yields that the nonoperationalness and the rustication occurs. sent20: that the rustication does not occur brings about that the toilet but not the swiping happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rustication does not occur.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the toilet occurs but the swiping does not occur.; sent8 -> int2: the guaranteeing ambusher happens.; sent12 & sent9 -> int3: the entreaty does not occur.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the life-supportness but not the queening skyrocket happens is false.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the babel does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__