the fact that the crystallization is non-biotitic thing that is a kind of a nibble is not false.
sent1: if there exists something such that it does not vex agency the crystallization is not biotitic. sent2: that the cold is a kind of a dodder and/or it does not pleach shad is not right if that it is not Soviet is correct. sent3: the statesman is unostentatious or it pleaches novel or both. sent4: if there exists something such that it does pleach shad the packrat does not vex agency. sent5: there is something such that it does vex agency. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not pleach shad and it is a dodder is wrong the packrat does not vex agency. sent7: if the fact that the cold is a baldness that is a majority is not correct the crystallization is not a cracking. sent8: the nearside is not a baldness if something is a cracking. sent9: if the fact that something either is Soviet or is not a Tahitian or both does not hold it is a majority. sent10: the cold is both not a cracking and a baldness. sent11: the cenobite is not a kind of a nibble. sent12: that either the nearside is Soviet or it is non-Tahitian or both is wrong if it does not light. sent13: if the nearside does not light it is not Soviet. sent14: the crystallization is a kind of non-biotitic thing that nibbles if something does not vex agency. sent15: something that is not a kind of a baldness is not a majority. sent16: the crystallization is not biotitic. sent17: the nearside is not a baldness if either something is a kind of a dodder or it is a cracking or both. sent18: if that something pleaches shad is true the fact that it is not a Sarpedon and is homeopathic is false. sent19: the cold does not pleach shad. sent20: the nearside is not Soviet. sent21: there is something such that that it pleaches shad and is a dodder is incorrect. sent22: the nearside is not a light. sent23: that that something is not biotitic and is a nibble hold does not hold if it does not pleach shad. sent24: the fact that that the cold does pleach shad and it is a dodder hold does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cold does not pleach shad and is a dodder is correct.; assump1 -> int1: the cold is a dodder.; int1 -> int2: either the cold is a dodder or it is a cracking or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a dodder or it is a cracking or both.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the nearside is not a baldness.; sent15 -> int5: the nearside is not a majority if it is not a kind of a baldness.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nearside is not a majority.; sent9 -> int7: the nearside is a majority if the fact that it is Soviet and/or it is not a Tahitian is incorrect.; sent12 & sent22 -> int8: the fact that the nearside is Soviet and/or it is not a Tahitian is wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the nearside is a kind of a majority.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fact that the cold does not pleach shad and is a kind of a dodder does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it does not pleach shad and it is a dodder is false.; int12 & sent6 -> int13: the packrat does not vex agency.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it does not vex agency.; int14 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rustic is not a Sarpedon but it is homeopathic is incorrect.
sent18 -> int15: if the rustic pleaches shad then the fact that it is not a Sarpedon and is homeopathic does not hold.; sent10 -> int16: the cold does not crack.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the crystallization is non-biotitic thing that is a kind of a nibble is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it does not vex agency the crystallization is not biotitic. sent2: that the cold is a kind of a dodder and/or it does not pleach shad is not right if that it is not Soviet is correct. sent3: the statesman is unostentatious or it pleaches novel or both. sent4: if there exists something such that it does pleach shad the packrat does not vex agency. sent5: there is something such that it does vex agency. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not pleach shad and it is a dodder is wrong the packrat does not vex agency. sent7: if the fact that the cold is a baldness that is a majority is not correct the crystallization is not a cracking. sent8: the nearside is not a baldness if something is a cracking. sent9: if the fact that something either is Soviet or is not a Tahitian or both does not hold it is a majority. sent10: the cold is both not a cracking and a baldness. sent11: the cenobite is not a kind of a nibble. sent12: that either the nearside is Soviet or it is non-Tahitian or both is wrong if it does not light. sent13: if the nearside does not light it is not Soviet. sent14: the crystallization is a kind of non-biotitic thing that nibbles if something does not vex agency. sent15: something that is not a kind of a baldness is not a majority. sent16: the crystallization is not biotitic. sent17: the nearside is not a baldness if either something is a kind of a dodder or it is a cracking or both. sent18: if that something pleaches shad is true the fact that it is not a Sarpedon and is homeopathic is false. sent19: the cold does not pleach shad. sent20: the nearside is not Soviet. sent21: there is something such that that it pleaches shad and is a dodder is incorrect. sent22: the nearside is not a light. sent23: that that something is not biotitic and is a nibble hold does not hold if it does not pleach shad. sent24: the fact that that the cold does pleach shad and it is a dodder hold does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the cold does not pleach shad and is a dodder is correct.; assump1 -> int1: the cold is a dodder.; int1 -> int2: either the cold is a dodder or it is a cracking or both.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a dodder or it is a cracking or both.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the nearside is not a baldness.; sent15 -> int5: the nearside is not a majority if it is not a kind of a baldness.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nearside is not a majority.; sent9 -> int7: the nearside is a majority if the fact that it is Soviet and/or it is not a Tahitian is incorrect.; sent12 & sent22 -> int8: the fact that the nearside is Soviet and/or it is not a Tahitian is wrong.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the nearside is a kind of a majority.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fact that the cold does not pleach shad and is a kind of a dodder does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it does not pleach shad and it is a dodder is false.; int12 & sent6 -> int13: the packrat does not vex agency.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it does not vex agency.; int14 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__