that the marking yields that the negotiating Basque does not occur but the punishment happens is not right.
sent1: the trisecting Jong does not occur. sent2: the negotiating Basque does not occur. sent3: if the trisecting unselfishness does not occur then the gladness does not occur. sent4: the antithyroidness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the negotiating commune does not occur is not wrong then the negotiating Basque does not occur and the punishment happens. sent6: the inexplicableness happens. sent7: if the negotiating Basque does not occur both the marking and the whittling occurs. sent8: the reaching happens. sent9: the marking does not occur if the negotiating commune happens and the reach occurs. sent10: the trisecting consumer does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mark happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the negotiating commune occurs.; assump2 & sent8 -> int1: the negotiating commune happens and the reach occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the marking does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the negotiating commune does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the negotiating Basque does not occur and the punishment happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the whittling occurs and the incautiousness happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the marking yields that the negotiating Basque does not occur but the punishment happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the trisecting Jong does not occur. sent2: the negotiating Basque does not occur. sent3: if the trisecting unselfishness does not occur then the gladness does not occur. sent4: the antithyroidness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the negotiating commune does not occur is not wrong then the negotiating Basque does not occur and the punishment happens. sent6: the inexplicableness happens. sent7: if the negotiating Basque does not occur both the marking and the whittling occurs. sent8: the reaching happens. sent9: the marking does not occur if the negotiating commune happens and the reach occurs. sent10: the trisecting consumer does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mark happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the negotiating commune occurs.; assump2 & sent8 -> int1: the negotiating commune happens and the reach occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the marking does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the negotiating commune does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the negotiating Basque does not occur and the punishment happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__