that either the sliming ascospore or the apsidalness or both occurs is not wrong.
sent1: that the underwriting shuffle happens is prevented by that the Shona and the implicationalness happens. sent2: that the Neapolitan does not occur and/or the eagerness is caused by the non-loyalness. sent3: if the stubbing website happens the fact that the sliming exhortation does not occur and the underwriting beads happens is not true. sent4: the unpublishableness or the Unitarian or both happens. sent5: that the anthropologicalness does not occur and the underwriting trill does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the uneagerness does not occur then the stubbing rhabdovirus happens. sent7: if the Unitarianness happens then the unifilarness occurs. sent8: the industrialization does not occur. sent9: that the unifilarness and the non-Unitarianness happens is wrong if the implicationalness does not occur. sent10: that the stubbing website occurs and the galvanism happens is caused by the non-unreproducibleness. sent11: the scudding triggers the non-unreproducibleness. sent12: if the unpublishableness does not occur that either the sliming ascospore occurs or the apsidalness happens or both does not hold. sent13: the fact that the loyalness does not occur is not wrong if that the vitiliginousness happens and/or the lark does not occur is wrong. sent14: the sliming ascospore is brought about by that the closing and the non-Shonaness happens. sent15: if the unifilarness occurs the fact that the implicationalness happens is not incorrect. sent16: the stubbing rhabdovirus occurs. sent17: the Neapolitanness happens and the uneagerness does not occur. sent18: the unifilarness occurs if the unpublishableness happens. sent19: if the fact that not the sliming exhortation but the underwriting beads occurs is false the underwriting beads does not occur. sent20: if the underwriting beads does not occur the fact that the vitiliginousness happens and/or the lark does not occur is not correct. sent21: if the fact that the stubbing rhabdovirus does not occur is correct then not the closeness but the industrialization happens. sent22: the scud happens if that the anthropologicalness does not occur and the underwriting trill does not occur is not correct. sent23: if the industrialization does not occur the underwriting shuffle occurs.
sent4 & sent18 & sent7 -> int1: the unifilarness happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the implicationalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Shonaness happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Shonaness happens and the implicationalness happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the underwriting shuffle does not occur.; sent23 & sent8 -> int5: the underwriting shuffle happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Shona does not occur.; sent17 -> int8: the uneagerness does not occur.;
the fact that the sliming ascospore or the apsidalness or both happens is incorrect.
sent22 & sent5 -> int9: the scudding happens.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: the unreproducibleness does not occur.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: both the stubbing website and the galvanism happens.; int11 -> int12: the stubbing website happens.; sent3 & int12 -> int13: the fact that not the sliming exhortation but the underwriting beads occurs does not hold.; sent19 & int13 -> int14: the underwriting beads does not occur.; sent20 & int14 -> int15: the fact that either the vitiliginousness occurs or the lark does not occur or both does not hold.; sent13 & int15 -> int16: the loyalness does not occur.; sent2 & int16 -> int17: the non-Neapolitanness and/or the non-uneagerness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that either the sliming ascospore or the apsidalness or both occurs is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the underwriting shuffle happens is prevented by that the Shona and the implicationalness happens. sent2: that the Neapolitan does not occur and/or the eagerness is caused by the non-loyalness. sent3: if the stubbing website happens the fact that the sliming exhortation does not occur and the underwriting beads happens is not true. sent4: the unpublishableness or the Unitarian or both happens. sent5: that the anthropologicalness does not occur and the underwriting trill does not occur does not hold. sent6: if the uneagerness does not occur then the stubbing rhabdovirus happens. sent7: if the Unitarianness happens then the unifilarness occurs. sent8: the industrialization does not occur. sent9: that the unifilarness and the non-Unitarianness happens is wrong if the implicationalness does not occur. sent10: that the stubbing website occurs and the galvanism happens is caused by the non-unreproducibleness. sent11: the scudding triggers the non-unreproducibleness. sent12: if the unpublishableness does not occur that either the sliming ascospore occurs or the apsidalness happens or both does not hold. sent13: the fact that the loyalness does not occur is not wrong if that the vitiliginousness happens and/or the lark does not occur is wrong. sent14: the sliming ascospore is brought about by that the closing and the non-Shonaness happens. sent15: if the unifilarness occurs the fact that the implicationalness happens is not incorrect. sent16: the stubbing rhabdovirus occurs. sent17: the Neapolitanness happens and the uneagerness does not occur. sent18: the unifilarness occurs if the unpublishableness happens. sent19: if the fact that not the sliming exhortation but the underwriting beads occurs is false the underwriting beads does not occur. sent20: if the underwriting beads does not occur the fact that the vitiliginousness happens and/or the lark does not occur is not correct. sent21: if the fact that the stubbing rhabdovirus does not occur is correct then not the closeness but the industrialization happens. sent22: the scud happens if that the anthropologicalness does not occur and the underwriting trill does not occur is not correct. sent23: if the industrialization does not occur the underwriting shuffle occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent18 & sent7 -> int1: the unifilarness happens.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the implicationalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Shonaness happens.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Shonaness happens and the implicationalness happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the underwriting shuffle does not occur.; sent23 & sent8 -> int5: the underwriting shuffle happens.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Shona does not occur.; sent17 -> int8: the uneagerness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__