something is a kind of a incubus and does not lean electrocution.
sent1: there is something such that it does not lean electrocution. sent2: there exists something such that it leans muumuu. sent3: the eclectic does not lean electrocution. sent4: the Pablum is not a incubus. sent5: the workshop leans electrocution and is not a kind of a forward. sent6: if there exists something such that it is offshore then the embankment does not lean electrocution. sent7: the embankment is not frequent and is not a kind of a pavement. sent8: there is something such that it is a incubus and it does lean electrocution. sent9: there are Slovenian and non-predestinarian things. sent10: there are offshore things. sent11: if something is a kind of a second the antediluvian is both Dorian and not astigmatic. sent12: if that the embankment does enfranchise groundberry and leans electrocution is incorrect it does not leans electrocution. sent13: the festoon leans electrocution and is not assertive. sent14: something does enfranchise morceau and it is a kind of a paved. sent15: the embankment is a incubus but it does not lean electrocution if something is offshore. sent16: the embankment does not lean electrocution. sent17: if something is a kind of a cytologist the embankment is a team but it is not a kind of an audible. sent18: something is a production but it is non-hydric. sent19: something is a incubus. sent20: something is not a Qatar. sent21: the fact that the embankment does enfranchise groundberry and does lean electrocution does not hold if the fact that the converter is not a dimetrodon hold. sent22: something is a kind of a cant but it does not burden if it is offshore.
sent10 & sent15 -> int1: the embankment is a incubus that does not lean electrocution.; int1 -> hypothesis;
that there exists something such that it is a cant and it is not a burdened is true.
sent22 -> int2: that if the embankment is offshore then the embankment is a cant but it does not burden is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = something is a kind of a incubus and does not lean electrocution. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does not lean electrocution. sent2: there exists something such that it leans muumuu. sent3: the eclectic does not lean electrocution. sent4: the Pablum is not a incubus. sent5: the workshop leans electrocution and is not a kind of a forward. sent6: if there exists something such that it is offshore then the embankment does not lean electrocution. sent7: the embankment is not frequent and is not a kind of a pavement. sent8: there is something such that it is a incubus and it does lean electrocution. sent9: there are Slovenian and non-predestinarian things. sent10: there are offshore things. sent11: if something is a kind of a second the antediluvian is both Dorian and not astigmatic. sent12: if that the embankment does enfranchise groundberry and leans electrocution is incorrect it does not leans electrocution. sent13: the festoon leans electrocution and is not assertive. sent14: something does enfranchise morceau and it is a kind of a paved. sent15: the embankment is a incubus but it does not lean electrocution if something is offshore. sent16: the embankment does not lean electrocution. sent17: if something is a kind of a cytologist the embankment is a team but it is not a kind of an audible. sent18: something is a production but it is non-hydric. sent19: something is a incubus. sent20: something is not a Qatar. sent21: the fact that the embankment does enfranchise groundberry and does lean electrocution does not hold if the fact that the converter is not a dimetrodon hold. sent22: something is a kind of a cant but it does not burden if it is offshore. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent15 -> int1: the embankment is a incubus that does not lean electrocution.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__