the talent does staple waterline.
sent1: the fact that the talent is not bimillenial is true if it is a kind of a sulk that is not irresponsible. sent2: there is something such that it is not non-incestuous. sent3: the picker is a rosemary. sent4: the talent does not recoup and is secretarial. sent5: if the picker is not irresponsible then the talent shelves but it is not irresponsible. sent6: the fact that the fact that the Wobbly does not recoup but it is a kind of a sulk is false is not incorrect. sent7: the Wobbly is not bimillenial but it acquaints flask if something is incestuous. sent8: if the Wobbly acquaints flask it is a negativist. sent9: if something recoups it desquamates. sent10: if the picker does desquamate and is irresponsible it does not recoup. sent11: the picker is not a sulk. sent12: the talent is bimillenial. sent13: the Wobbly recoups if the fact that it does not recoups and is a kind of a sulk does not hold. sent14: the picker is not irresponsible if the Wobbly acquaints flask and it desquamates. sent15: the Wobbly is bimillenial but it does not shelve if the talent does not shelve. sent16: something does not staple waterline if it does shelve and it is not irresponsible.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the Wobbly is not bimillenial but it does acquaint flask.; int1 -> int2: the Wobbly does acquaint flask.; sent9 -> int3: if the Wobbly recoups then it does desquamate.; sent13 & sent6 -> int4: the Wobbly does recoup.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Wobbly desquamates.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the Wobbly does acquaint flask and desquamates.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the picker is not irresponsible.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the talent does shelve but it is not irresponsible.; sent16 -> int9: if the talent shelves but it is not irresponsible then that it does not staple waterline is right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the talent does staple waterline. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the talent is not bimillenial is true if it is a kind of a sulk that is not irresponsible. sent2: there is something such that it is not non-incestuous. sent3: the picker is a rosemary. sent4: the talent does not recoup and is secretarial. sent5: if the picker is not irresponsible then the talent shelves but it is not irresponsible. sent6: the fact that the fact that the Wobbly does not recoup but it is a kind of a sulk is false is not incorrect. sent7: the Wobbly is not bimillenial but it acquaints flask if something is incestuous. sent8: if the Wobbly acquaints flask it is a negativist. sent9: if something recoups it desquamates. sent10: if the picker does desquamate and is irresponsible it does not recoup. sent11: the picker is not a sulk. sent12: the talent is bimillenial. sent13: the Wobbly recoups if the fact that it does not recoups and is a kind of a sulk does not hold. sent14: the picker is not irresponsible if the Wobbly acquaints flask and it desquamates. sent15: the Wobbly is bimillenial but it does not shelve if the talent does not shelve. sent16: something does not staple waterline if it does shelve and it is not irresponsible. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the Wobbly is not bimillenial but it does acquaint flask.; int1 -> int2: the Wobbly does acquaint flask.; sent9 -> int3: if the Wobbly recoups then it does desquamate.; sent13 & sent6 -> int4: the Wobbly does recoup.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the Wobbly desquamates.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the Wobbly does acquaint flask and desquamates.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the picker is not irresponsible.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the talent does shelve but it is not irresponsible.; sent16 -> int9: if the talent shelves but it is not irresponsible then that it does not staple waterline is right.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__