the fact that the aigrette does not shrink and it is not unshaven is wrong.
sent1: the nailbrush does not shrink if the tocopherol is not eruptive and not uninjectable. sent2: if the elimination is not eruptive the tocopherol is a kind of eruptive thing that is not uninjectable. sent3: something is cationic if it does not maunder. sent4: if the nailbrush does not shrink then the fact that the aigrette does not shrink and it is not unshaven is not right. sent5: the elimination is not eruptive if the screw does maunder. sent6: if something is not cationic the fact that the screw does not maunder and is a kind of a parr does not hold. sent7: that if the fact that the screw does not maunder but it is a parr is incorrect the elimination is not eruptive hold.
the aigrette does not shrink and is not unshaven.
sent3 -> int1: the aigrette is cationic if it does not maunder.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the aigrette does not shrink and it is not unshaven is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the nailbrush does not shrink if the tocopherol is not eruptive and not uninjectable. sent2: if the elimination is not eruptive the tocopherol is a kind of eruptive thing that is not uninjectable. sent3: something is cationic if it does not maunder. sent4: if the nailbrush does not shrink then the fact that the aigrette does not shrink and it is not unshaven is not right. sent5: the elimination is not eruptive if the screw does maunder. sent6: if something is not cationic the fact that the screw does not maunder and is a kind of a parr does not hold. sent7: that if the fact that the screw does not maunder but it is a parr is incorrect the elimination is not eruptive hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__