the fact that the ibex is Hemingwayesque is right.
sent1: the fact that the Uniat is Hemingwayesque and does not halve antineutrino does not hold if it is a moat. sent2: the Uniat does halve antineutrino if there is something such that the fact that it is not a crush hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a crush and not grassless is not true. sent4: if something does not function VI then it is Hemingwayesque. sent5: if the ibex does not function VI it is Hemingwayesque. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a crush and grassless is false. sent7: something is Hemingwayesque if the fact that it does function VI and it is not impartial is false. sent8: if the voltage is a moat then the fact that the ibex functions VI but it is not impartial is not true. sent9: if the Uniat does halve antineutrino then the voltage is a moat. sent10: the Uniat halves antineutrino if there exists something such that that it crushes and it is non-grassless is wrong.
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the Uniat does halve antineutrino.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the voltage is a moat.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the fact that the ibex functions VI and is not impartial hold does not hold.; sent7 -> int4: if the fact that the ibex does function VI and is prejudiced is wrong then it is Hemingwayesque.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the ibex is not Hemingwayesque.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ibex is Hemingwayesque is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Uniat is Hemingwayesque and does not halve antineutrino does not hold if it is a moat. sent2: the Uniat does halve antineutrino if there is something such that the fact that it is not a crush hold. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a crush and not grassless is not true. sent4: if something does not function VI then it is Hemingwayesque. sent5: if the ibex does not function VI it is Hemingwayesque. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a crush and grassless is false. sent7: something is Hemingwayesque if the fact that it does function VI and it is not impartial is false. sent8: if the voltage is a moat then the fact that the ibex functions VI but it is not impartial is not true. sent9: if the Uniat does halve antineutrino then the voltage is a moat. sent10: the Uniat halves antineutrino if there exists something such that that it crushes and it is non-grassless is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the Uniat does halve antineutrino.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the voltage is a moat.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: that the fact that the ibex functions VI and is not impartial hold does not hold.; sent7 -> int4: if the fact that the ibex does function VI and is prejudiced is wrong then it is Hemingwayesque.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__