the pith is both not non-neonatal and a gramophone.
sent1: the pith is both not diploid and neonatal. sent2: if the sawpit is not a kind of a diploid the fact that the pith is neonatal and it is a kind of a gramophone is incorrect. sent3: the pith is non-extroversive. sent4: there is something such that it is psychogenic. sent5: something is neonatal if the fact that it is psychogenic and it does not enclose pith is wrong. sent6: the pith does not enclose pith. sent7: the sawpit is not diploid if the whiting does not eventuate and is neonatal. sent8: if that the whiting does not enclose pith and does eventuate hold the sawpit is not diploid. sent9: the fact that the whiting does enclose pith and it is a kind of a gramophone is not correct. sent10: if something is psychogenic then the whiting does not enclose pith and does eventuate. sent11: if the sawpit is not neonatal but it is a kind of a diploid then the pith is not a gramophone. sent12: the fact that the pith is a kind of neonatal thing that encloses pith is not correct.
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the whiting does not enclose pith but it eventuates.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the sawpit is not a diploid.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the pith is neonatal and a gramophone.
sent5 -> int3: if the fact that that the pith is psychogenic and does not enclose pith is not false is incorrect it is neonatal.;
$hypothesis$ = the pith is both not non-neonatal and a gramophone. ; $context$ = sent1: the pith is both not diploid and neonatal. sent2: if the sawpit is not a kind of a diploid the fact that the pith is neonatal and it is a kind of a gramophone is incorrect. sent3: the pith is non-extroversive. sent4: there is something such that it is psychogenic. sent5: something is neonatal if the fact that it is psychogenic and it does not enclose pith is wrong. sent6: the pith does not enclose pith. sent7: the sawpit is not diploid if the whiting does not eventuate and is neonatal. sent8: if that the whiting does not enclose pith and does eventuate hold the sawpit is not diploid. sent9: the fact that the whiting does enclose pith and it is a kind of a gramophone is not correct. sent10: if something is psychogenic then the whiting does not enclose pith and does eventuate. sent11: if the sawpit is not neonatal but it is a kind of a diploid then the pith is not a gramophone. sent12: the fact that the pith is a kind of neonatal thing that encloses pith is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the whiting does not enclose pith but it eventuates.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the sawpit is not a diploid.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__