the baptistry is a kind of non-auditory thing that is not a kind of a Phyllocladus.
sent1: if something is not a chimaera that it is not auditory and it is not a Phyllocladus is not right. sent2: the baptistry is not auditory and it is not a Phyllocladus if the stitchwort is not a Phyllocladus. sent3: there exists something such that it does not lime inspiration and does consist. sent4: if the pillory does not hymn woodpile then that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile but it is a handbreadth does not hold. sent5: if something is a handbreadth it is not a Phyllocladus. sent6: if the inclusion is a chimaera then the dachshund does not consist. sent7: there exists something such that it limes inspiration and does not consist. sent8: if the inclusion is a chimaera the dachshund does not lime inspiration and does not consist. sent9: the fact that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile but it is a handbreadth is false. sent10: the baptistry is not a Phyllocladus. sent11: the stitchwort is not a Phyllocladus if it is a handbreadth. sent12: if the fact that the inclusion is non-astronautic thing that is not a Phyllocladus is incorrect then it does not hymn woodpile. sent13: that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile and it is not a kind of a handbreadth does not hold if the pillory does not hymn woodpile. sent14: the inclusion is astronautic. sent15: something does not lime inspiration. sent16: the dachshund does hymn woodpile. sent17: the dachshund does not consist. sent18: if the stitchwort is not a kind of a Phyllocladus then the baptistry is not a Phyllocladus. sent19: if the dachshund is not a handbreadth the stitchwort does not consist and is not a handbreadth. sent20: the inclusion is a chimaera and astronautic. sent21: something does not consist. sent22: if that something does not hymn woodpile and is not a handbreadth is wrong that it is not a kind of a Phyllocladus is not wrong. sent23: if something does not lime inspiration and does not consist the pillory does not hymn woodpile. sent24: if something is astronautic and does consist then that it is not a kind of a chimaera hold.
sent20 -> int1: the inclusion is a chimaera.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the dachshund does not lime inspiration and does not consist.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does not lime inspiration and does not consist.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the pillory does not hymn woodpile.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile and is not a handbreadth does not hold.; sent22 -> int6: the stitchwort is not a Phyllocladus if that it does not hymn woodpile and is not a handbreadth does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the stitchwort is not a kind of a Phyllocladus.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the baptistry is both not auditory and not a Phyllocladus is wrong.
sent1 -> int8: if the baptistry is not a chimaera the fact that it is not auditory and it is not a Phyllocladus is false.; sent24 -> int9: if the baptistry is astronautic and does consist it is not a chimaera.;
$hypothesis$ = the baptistry is a kind of non-auditory thing that is not a kind of a Phyllocladus. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a chimaera that it is not auditory and it is not a Phyllocladus is not right. sent2: the baptistry is not auditory and it is not a Phyllocladus if the stitchwort is not a Phyllocladus. sent3: there exists something such that it does not lime inspiration and does consist. sent4: if the pillory does not hymn woodpile then that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile but it is a handbreadth does not hold. sent5: if something is a handbreadth it is not a Phyllocladus. sent6: if the inclusion is a chimaera then the dachshund does not consist. sent7: there exists something such that it limes inspiration and does not consist. sent8: if the inclusion is a chimaera the dachshund does not lime inspiration and does not consist. sent9: the fact that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile but it is a handbreadth is false. sent10: the baptistry is not a Phyllocladus. sent11: the stitchwort is not a Phyllocladus if it is a handbreadth. sent12: if the fact that the inclusion is non-astronautic thing that is not a Phyllocladus is incorrect then it does not hymn woodpile. sent13: that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile and it is not a kind of a handbreadth does not hold if the pillory does not hymn woodpile. sent14: the inclusion is astronautic. sent15: something does not lime inspiration. sent16: the dachshund does hymn woodpile. sent17: the dachshund does not consist. sent18: if the stitchwort is not a kind of a Phyllocladus then the baptistry is not a Phyllocladus. sent19: if the dachshund is not a handbreadth the stitchwort does not consist and is not a handbreadth. sent20: the inclusion is a chimaera and astronautic. sent21: something does not consist. sent22: if that something does not hymn woodpile and is not a handbreadth is wrong that it is not a kind of a Phyllocladus is not wrong. sent23: if something does not lime inspiration and does not consist the pillory does not hymn woodpile. sent24: if something is astronautic and does consist then that it is not a kind of a chimaera hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: the inclusion is a chimaera.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the dachshund does not lime inspiration and does not consist.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does not lime inspiration and does not consist.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: the pillory does not hymn woodpile.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the fact that the stitchwort does not hymn woodpile and is not a handbreadth does not hold.; sent22 -> int6: the stitchwort is not a Phyllocladus if that it does not hymn woodpile and is not a handbreadth does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the stitchwort is not a kind of a Phyllocladus.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__