the debriefing dentist occurs.
sent1: if the anticholinergicness does not occur then that the thermodynamicness happens and the casuisticness does not occur is false. sent2: that both the non-rh-negativeness and the chip happens is not true. sent3: the spoiling Phyllocladus happens and the lacustrineness occurs if the inhabitancy does not occur. sent4: if that the thermodynamicness and the non-casuisticness happens is not true the fact that the thermodynamicness occurs is not correct. sent5: that the debriefing dentist happens and the synonymousness happens is brought about by that the scrupling does not occur. sent6: the inhabitancy triggers that either the spoiling Phyllocladus does not occur or the lacustrineness does not occur or both. sent7: if the enterprise does not occur but the autotypicness occurs the transporting does not occur. sent8: the lacustrineness happens. sent9: that the thermodynamicness does not occur yields that not the enterprise but the autotypicness occurs. sent10: that not the autotypicness but the thermodynamicness occurs is brought about by the non-anticholinergicness. sent11: that the debriefing dentist occurs is prevented by that the synonymousness does not occur. sent12: that the transporting does not occur causes that both the inhabitancy and the lacustrineness happens. sent13: the scrupling is brought about by that the chipping does not occur. sent14: if the autotypicness does not occur then the enterprise does not occur and the transport does not occur. sent15: if the enterprise does not occur and the transport does not occur the inhabitancy occurs. sent16: if the fact that the scrupling does not occur hold the synonymousness and the debriefing dentist occurs. sent17: if the fact that the educing occurs and the casuisticness does not occur is not right then that the anticholinergic does not occur hold. sent18: if the compensation does not occur then the idealization and the myelography occurs. sent19: that not the enterprise but the brawling occurs is not true. sent20: the inhabitancy does not occur. sent21: if both the scrupling and the synonymousness occurs the spoiling Phyllocladus does not occur. sent22: if the fact that not the rh-negativeness but the chip happens is wrong then the scrupling occurs.
sent22 & sent2 -> int1: that the scruple occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the synonymousness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scruple happens and the synonymousness occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the spoiling Phyllocladus does not occur.; sent3 & sent20 -> int4: both the spoiling Phyllocladus and the lacustrineness happens.; int4 -> int5: the spoiling Phyllocladus happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the synonymousness does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the debriefing dentist occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the debriefing dentist occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the anticholinergicness does not occur then that the thermodynamicness happens and the casuisticness does not occur is false. sent2: that both the non-rh-negativeness and the chip happens is not true. sent3: the spoiling Phyllocladus happens and the lacustrineness occurs if the inhabitancy does not occur. sent4: if that the thermodynamicness and the non-casuisticness happens is not true the fact that the thermodynamicness occurs is not correct. sent5: that the debriefing dentist happens and the synonymousness happens is brought about by that the scrupling does not occur. sent6: the inhabitancy triggers that either the spoiling Phyllocladus does not occur or the lacustrineness does not occur or both. sent7: if the enterprise does not occur but the autotypicness occurs the transporting does not occur. sent8: the lacustrineness happens. sent9: that the thermodynamicness does not occur yields that not the enterprise but the autotypicness occurs. sent10: that not the autotypicness but the thermodynamicness occurs is brought about by the non-anticholinergicness. sent11: that the debriefing dentist occurs is prevented by that the synonymousness does not occur. sent12: that the transporting does not occur causes that both the inhabitancy and the lacustrineness happens. sent13: the scrupling is brought about by that the chipping does not occur. sent14: if the autotypicness does not occur then the enterprise does not occur and the transport does not occur. sent15: if the enterprise does not occur and the transport does not occur the inhabitancy occurs. sent16: if the fact that the scrupling does not occur hold the synonymousness and the debriefing dentist occurs. sent17: if the fact that the educing occurs and the casuisticness does not occur is not right then that the anticholinergic does not occur hold. sent18: if the compensation does not occur then the idealization and the myelography occurs. sent19: that not the enterprise but the brawling occurs is not true. sent20: the inhabitancy does not occur. sent21: if both the scrupling and the synonymousness occurs the spoiling Phyllocladus does not occur. sent22: if the fact that not the rh-negativeness but the chip happens is wrong then the scrupling occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent2 -> int1: that the scruple occurs hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the synonymousness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scruple happens and the synonymousness occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the spoiling Phyllocladus does not occur.; sent3 & sent20 -> int4: both the spoiling Phyllocladus and the lacustrineness happens.; int4 -> int5: the spoiling Phyllocladus happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the synonymousness does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__