the hexapod is not geological.
sent1: if the shower does turf lipped but it is not a kind of a gendarmerie then the fact that it does not case Jayshullah is not incorrect. sent2: that the shower is not a kind of a gendarmerie is correct. sent3: the shower turfs lipped. sent4: the hexapod divaricates complexion if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not acneiform and a volcano does not hold. sent5: The lipped turfs shower. sent6: if the hexapod does divaricate complexion then it does not zone and/or cases hurdles. sent7: if the hexapod is not a zone and/or it cases hurdles it is not geological. sent8: there is something such that it is a kind of non-acneiform a volcano.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the shower does turf lipped and is not a gendarmerie.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the shower does not case Jayshullah.;
$hypothesis$ = the hexapod is not geological. ; $context$ = sent1: if the shower does turf lipped but it is not a kind of a gendarmerie then the fact that it does not case Jayshullah is not incorrect. sent2: that the shower is not a kind of a gendarmerie is correct. sent3: the shower turfs lipped. sent4: the hexapod divaricates complexion if there exists something such that the fact that it is both not acneiform and a volcano does not hold. sent5: The lipped turfs shower. sent6: if the hexapod does divaricate complexion then it does not zone and/or cases hurdles. sent7: if the hexapod is not a zone and/or it cases hurdles it is not geological. sent8: there is something such that it is a kind of non-acneiform a volcano. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the shower does turf lipped and is not a gendarmerie.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the shower does not case Jayshullah.; __UNKNOWN__