the manganese is a kind of a stinkpot.
sent1: if the fact that the process-server is not phonemic but it is a Scomberomorus is not right then it is minuscule. sent2: if something canes loblolly the fact that it is a lamb and not a virus is not correct. sent3: the bravo canes loblolly if the libertarian is bifilar. sent4: the fact that the process-server is a strengthener is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is a lamb and it is not a virus is not correct. sent5: the fact that the libertarian is Homeric and it is bifilar is right. sent6: the process-server does not reverberate. sent7: the fact that something is not Homeric but it is bifilar is wrong if that it does not cane loblolly is not false. sent8: if that the process-server does not reverberate is correct then that it is both not phonemic and a Scomberomorus does not hold. sent9: the manganese is not a stinkpot if there is something such that it is a strengthener and it is a minuscule.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the libertarian is bifilar is correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bravo canes loblolly.; sent2 -> int3: if the bravo canes loblolly that the fact that it is a lamb and not a virus is not wrong does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bravo lambs but it is not a virus is false.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it lambs and is not a virus is not correct.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the process-server is a strengthener.; sent8 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the process-server is not phonemic but it is a Scomberomorus is not correct.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the process-server is minuscule.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the process-server is a strengthener and it is not non-minuscule.; int9 -> int10: something is a strengthener that is minuscule.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the manganese reverberates.
sent7 -> int11: if the fact that the bravo does not cane loblolly is not false then the fact that it is not Homeric and it is bifilar is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the manganese is a kind of a stinkpot. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the process-server is not phonemic but it is a Scomberomorus is not right then it is minuscule. sent2: if something canes loblolly the fact that it is a lamb and not a virus is not correct. sent3: the bravo canes loblolly if the libertarian is bifilar. sent4: the fact that the process-server is a strengthener is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it is a lamb and it is not a virus is not correct. sent5: the fact that the libertarian is Homeric and it is bifilar is right. sent6: the process-server does not reverberate. sent7: the fact that something is not Homeric but it is bifilar is wrong if that it does not cane loblolly is not false. sent8: if that the process-server does not reverberate is correct then that it is both not phonemic and a Scomberomorus does not hold. sent9: the manganese is not a stinkpot if there is something such that it is a strengthener and it is a minuscule. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the libertarian is bifilar is correct.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the bravo canes loblolly.; sent2 -> int3: if the bravo canes loblolly that the fact that it is a lamb and not a virus is not wrong does not hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the bravo lambs but it is not a virus is false.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that that it lambs and is not a virus is not correct.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the process-server is a strengthener.; sent8 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the process-server is not phonemic but it is a Scomberomorus is not correct.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the process-server is minuscule.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the process-server is a strengthener and it is not non-minuscule.; int9 -> int10: something is a strengthener that is minuscule.; int10 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__