that there exists something such that if it clings Faraday and is not bisexual then it is not a pallone is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that if the letterman is the chyme and does not cling Faraday the letterman is not a malt is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a tangor and it is not a body it is not a sporozoan. sent3: if the letterman is heliocentric and does not cling Faraday then it is not a demonstrator. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bladderwrack that is not a Cameroonian then it is not a valency. sent5: something is not a weigela if it does irrigate and is not dacitic. sent6: if the letterman does cling Faraday but it is not bisexual it is a pallone. sent7: if something that does cling Faraday is not bisexual it is a pallone. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it clings Faraday and it is a bisexual is true it is not a pallone. sent9: the letterman is not a pallone if it clings Faraday and it is a bisexual. sent10: if something does cling Faraday and it is a bisexual the fact that it is not a pallone is correct. sent11: there exists something such that if it clings Faraday and is not bisexual then it is a pallone. sent12: if something that is arbitrary is not dextral it is not a kind of a demonstrator. sent13: if something does cling Faraday and is not a bisexual it is not a kind of a pallone.
sent13 -> int1: if the letterman does cling Faraday but it is not a bisexual it is not a pallone.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it clings Faraday and is not bisexual then it is not a pallone is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that if the letterman is the chyme and does not cling Faraday the letterman is not a malt is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a tangor and it is not a body it is not a sporozoan. sent3: if the letterman is heliocentric and does not cling Faraday then it is not a demonstrator. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a bladderwrack that is not a Cameroonian then it is not a valency. sent5: something is not a weigela if it does irrigate and is not dacitic. sent6: if the letterman does cling Faraday but it is not bisexual it is a pallone. sent7: if something that does cling Faraday is not bisexual it is a pallone. sent8: there exists something such that if the fact that it clings Faraday and it is a bisexual is true it is not a pallone. sent9: the letterman is not a pallone if it clings Faraday and it is a bisexual. sent10: if something does cling Faraday and it is a bisexual the fact that it is not a pallone is correct. sent11: there exists something such that if it clings Faraday and is not bisexual then it is a pallone. sent12: if something that is arbitrary is not dextral it is not a kind of a demonstrator. sent13: if something does cling Faraday and is not a bisexual it is not a kind of a pallone. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the letterman does cling Faraday but it is not a bisexual it is not a pallone.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__