the fact that there exists something such that if it is not attentional the fact that it is a mutability and not puritanical does not hold does not hold.
sent1: that something is a mutability but not puritanical is false if it is not attentional. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not attentional is correct it is a kind of a mutability that is not puritanical. sent3: if something is not attentional then it is a mutability but not puritanical. sent4: the fact that the spurner is a kind of a mutability and it is puritanical does not hold if it is not attentional. sent5: there exists something such that if it is attentional then that that it is both a mutability and not puritanical is correct does not hold. sent6: the fact that something is a mutability and is puritanical is not true if it is not attentional. sent7: the son-in-law is both caprine and non-ischemic if the fact that it is not attentional is not incorrect.
sent1 -> int1: if the spurner is not attentional then that it is a mutability and it is not puritanical does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not attentional the fact that it is a mutability and not puritanical does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a mutability but not puritanical is false if it is not attentional. sent2: there is something such that if that it is not attentional is correct it is a kind of a mutability that is not puritanical. sent3: if something is not attentional then it is a mutability but not puritanical. sent4: the fact that the spurner is a kind of a mutability and it is puritanical does not hold if it is not attentional. sent5: there exists something such that if it is attentional then that that it is both a mutability and not puritanical is correct does not hold. sent6: the fact that something is a mutability and is puritanical is not true if it is not attentional. sent7: the son-in-law is both caprine and non-ischemic if the fact that it is not attentional is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the spurner is not attentional then that it is a mutability and it is not puritanical does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__