the antagonisticness occurs and the clanking curio does not occur.
sent1: the Libyan does not occur. sent2: if the differentiableness does not occur then the Hegelian happens or the sputtering nepotist does not occur or both. sent3: if the Libyan does not occur the emergence occurs. sent4: if the calibration and the building occurs the fragmenting mash does not occur. sent5: if the fragmenting hydrogel does not occur then the antagonisticness happens or the Egyptian does not occur or both. sent6: the fragmenting hydrogel does not occur if that the strolling and the fragmenting hydrogel happens is incorrect. sent7: that the strolling and the fragmenting hydrogel happens does not hold. sent8: the fact that the calibration occurs is not wrong. sent9: if the Libyan happens then that the antagonisticness occurs but the clanking curio does not occur does not hold. sent10: the uplandness does not occur. sent11: the sputtering pood does not occur if the building occurs. sent12: the obtrusiveness or the emergence or both prevents that the clanking curio happens. sent13: the rut does not occur. sent14: that the antagonisticness does not occur is prevented by the antagonisticness or that the Egyptian does not occur or both. sent15: if the fact that the reallotment but not the cyber-terrorism happens is incorrect the reallotment does not occur. sent16: if the fragmenting mash does not occur the Egyptian happens and the convoying flail occurs. sent17: the non-obtrusiveness is caused by that the Egyptianness and the fragmenting hydrogel occurs. sent18: that both the fragmenting hydrogel and the strolling happens is brought about by that the reallotment does not occur. sent19: the luckiness occurs.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the emergence happens.; int1 -> int2: that the obtrusiveness happens or the emergence occurs or both hold.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the clanking curio does not occur.; sent6 & sent7 -> int4: the fragmenting hydrogel does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the antagonisticness occurs or the Egyptianness does not occur or both.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the antagonisticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis;
that the antagonisticness occurs and the clanking curio does not occur does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the antagonisticness occurs and the clanking curio does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the Libyan does not occur. sent2: if the differentiableness does not occur then the Hegelian happens or the sputtering nepotist does not occur or both. sent3: if the Libyan does not occur the emergence occurs. sent4: if the calibration and the building occurs the fragmenting mash does not occur. sent5: if the fragmenting hydrogel does not occur then the antagonisticness happens or the Egyptian does not occur or both. sent6: the fragmenting hydrogel does not occur if that the strolling and the fragmenting hydrogel happens is incorrect. sent7: that the strolling and the fragmenting hydrogel happens does not hold. sent8: the fact that the calibration occurs is not wrong. sent9: if the Libyan happens then that the antagonisticness occurs but the clanking curio does not occur does not hold. sent10: the uplandness does not occur. sent11: the sputtering pood does not occur if the building occurs. sent12: the obtrusiveness or the emergence or both prevents that the clanking curio happens. sent13: the rut does not occur. sent14: that the antagonisticness does not occur is prevented by the antagonisticness or that the Egyptian does not occur or both. sent15: if the fact that the reallotment but not the cyber-terrorism happens is incorrect the reallotment does not occur. sent16: if the fragmenting mash does not occur the Egyptian happens and the convoying flail occurs. sent17: the non-obtrusiveness is caused by that the Egyptianness and the fragmenting hydrogel occurs. sent18: that both the fragmenting hydrogel and the strolling happens is brought about by that the reallotment does not occur. sent19: the luckiness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the emergence happens.; int1 -> int2: that the obtrusiveness happens or the emergence occurs or both hold.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the clanking curio does not occur.; sent6 & sent7 -> int4: the fragmenting hydrogel does not occur.; sent5 & int4 -> int5: the antagonisticness occurs or the Egyptianness does not occur or both.; sent14 & int5 -> int6: the antagonisticness occurs.; int3 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__