there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a serine the fact that it is not a kick and it is not anamnestic is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lastex then that it is not a kind of a cassette and is eparchial is not correct. sent2: the fact that the Lao does not kick and it is not anamnestic is wrong if it is not a serine. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a serine it is not a kick and it is not anamnestic. sent4: if the Lao is not a kind of a serine then that it is not a kick and it is anamnestic does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a telephone then that it is not a nudge and it does not ossify is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not comfortable that it is not a cylindricality and is not a cumulonimbus is false. sent7: that the Lao is non-anamnestic thing that does pander is wrong if it is not slow. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it does flicker underclass the fact that it does not slow and is not a Manichaean is not correct is not incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a serine the fact that it is not a kind of a kick and it is not anamnestic is not true. sent10: if something is not auxetic then that it does not flicker graft and it is not faucal does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a blindworm then that it is offstage but not auxetic is not true. sent12: if that the Lao is not a serine is not wrong it is both not a kick and not anamnestic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a harasser then the fact that it does not flicker moneyed and is not a unau is not true. sent14: if the horsehide does not flicker Delacroix it is not a kind of a complementarity and it is not anamnestic. sent15: if the Lao is a serine that it is not a kick and it is not anamnestic is wrong.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not auxetic then that it does not flicker graft and is not faucal is incorrect.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the ascot does not flicker graft and it is not faucal is wrong if it is non-auxetic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a serine the fact that it is not a kick and it is not anamnestic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a Lastex then that it is not a kind of a cassette and is eparchial is not correct. sent2: the fact that the Lao does not kick and it is not anamnestic is wrong if it is not a serine. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a serine it is not a kick and it is not anamnestic. sent4: if the Lao is not a kind of a serine then that it is not a kick and it is anamnestic does not hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a telephone then that it is not a nudge and it does not ossify is not correct. sent6: there is something such that if it is not comfortable that it is not a cylindricality and is not a cumulonimbus is false. sent7: that the Lao is non-anamnestic thing that does pander is wrong if it is not slow. sent8: the fact that there exists something such that if it does flicker underclass the fact that it does not slow and is not a Manichaean is not correct is not incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a serine the fact that it is not a kind of a kick and it is not anamnestic is not true. sent10: if something is not auxetic then that it does not flicker graft and it is not faucal does not hold. sent11: there is something such that if it is not a blindworm then that it is offstage but not auxetic is not true. sent12: if that the Lao is not a serine is not wrong it is both not a kick and not anamnestic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a harasser then the fact that it does not flicker moneyed and is not a unau is not true. sent14: if the horsehide does not flicker Delacroix it is not a kind of a complementarity and it is not anamnestic. sent15: if the Lao is a serine that it is not a kick and it is not anamnestic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__