there exists something such that that it is a loving-kindness or is forcipate or both is not right.
sent1: The hotdog does not halve ladle. sent2: if that something frivols and is a depth is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Lidocaine. sent3: the fact that the lappet is not forcipate is right. sent4: that the lappet does frivol and it is a kind of a depth is not right if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a depth is correct. sent5: if the lappet is not a Lidocaine the ladle does not daydream. sent6: if something is a kind of a rofecoxib then it is a kind of a narcotraffic. sent7: if something does not daydream then it is both a rofecoxib and a Sawan. sent8: if the ladle does not halve hotdog then the lappet is non-forcipate. sent9: the squelch is not a depth. sent10: the ladle does not halve hotdog. sent11: the fact that the Sazerac halves hotdog and/or it is percussive is wrong if there exists something such that it is a narcotraffic.
that the Sazerac does halve hotdog and/or it is percussive is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the ladle is a rofecoxib is right then it is a narcotraffic.; sent7 -> int2: the ladle is a rofecoxib and is a Sawan if it does not daydream.; sent2 -> int3: the lappet is not a kind of a Lidocaine if the fact that it frivols and it is a depth does not hold.; sent9 -> int4: something is not a depth.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the lappet does frivol and is a depth does not hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the lappet is not a kind of a Lidocaine.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: that the ladle does not daydream is not wrong.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the ladle is both a rofecoxib and a Sawan.; int8 -> int9: the ladle is a rofecoxib.; int1 & int9 -> int10: the ladle is a narcotraffic.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is a narcotraffic.; int11 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that that it is a loving-kindness or is forcipate or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: The hotdog does not halve ladle. sent2: if that something frivols and is a depth is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Lidocaine. sent3: the fact that the lappet is not forcipate is right. sent4: that the lappet does frivol and it is a kind of a depth is not right if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a depth is correct. sent5: if the lappet is not a Lidocaine the ladle does not daydream. sent6: if something is a kind of a rofecoxib then it is a kind of a narcotraffic. sent7: if something does not daydream then it is both a rofecoxib and a Sawan. sent8: if the ladle does not halve hotdog then the lappet is non-forcipate. sent9: the squelch is not a depth. sent10: the ladle does not halve hotdog. sent11: the fact that the Sazerac halves hotdog and/or it is percussive is wrong if there exists something such that it is a narcotraffic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__