the fact that there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Plasmodiophora that does not gin SOP is false is false.
sent1: the fact that the barge does reprise blockbuster and it is a synchroflash is not true if there exists something such that it does reprise exarch. sent2: the Trilby gins nutlet and is urethral. sent3: the fact that that the Sinhalese stares accelerometer but it is not a kind of the Halcyon is not correct if the Sinhalese is a truncheon is correct. sent4: if the Trilby is generational then it does reprise exarch and is non-relative. sent5: the Sinhalese is a truncheon if the wagonwright is a kind of a ecclesiology. sent6: if the Trilby gins nutlet it is generational. sent7: if the concierge is not a ecclesiology and not a range then it is not a truncheon. sent8: something is not a range if the fact that it reprises blockbuster and is a synchroflash is not correct. sent9: the concierge is both not a ecclesiology and not a range. sent10: the wagonwright is a ecclesiology and/or it is a truncheon if something is not a range. sent11: that something is a Plasmodiophora but it does not gin SOP is wrong if it is not a truncheon.
sent11 -> int1: if that the concierge is not a truncheon is true then the fact that the fact that it is a Plasmodiophora and it does not gin SOP is correct is incorrect.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the concierge is not a truncheon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the concierge is a Plasmodiophora but it does not gin SOP is incorrect.; int3 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it does stare accelerometer and it is not a Halcyon does not hold.
sent8 -> int4: the barge is not a range if the fact that it reprises blockbuster and is a synchroflash is false.; sent2 -> int5: the Trilby gins nutlet.; sent6 & int5 -> int6: the Trilby is generational.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the Trilby reprises exarch and is not relative.; int7 -> int8: the Trilby does reprise exarch.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does reprise exarch.; int9 & sent1 -> int10: that that the barge reprises blockbuster and it is a synchroflash does not hold is correct.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the barge is not a range.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is a range is incorrect.; int12 & sent10 -> int13: the wagonwright is a ecclesiology or it is a kind of a truncheon or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it is a kind of a Plasmodiophora that does not gin SOP is false is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the barge does reprise blockbuster and it is a synchroflash is not true if there exists something such that it does reprise exarch. sent2: the Trilby gins nutlet and is urethral. sent3: the fact that that the Sinhalese stares accelerometer but it is not a kind of the Halcyon is not correct if the Sinhalese is a truncheon is correct. sent4: if the Trilby is generational then it does reprise exarch and is non-relative. sent5: the Sinhalese is a truncheon if the wagonwright is a kind of a ecclesiology. sent6: if the Trilby gins nutlet it is generational. sent7: if the concierge is not a ecclesiology and not a range then it is not a truncheon. sent8: something is not a range if the fact that it reprises blockbuster and is a synchroflash is not correct. sent9: the concierge is both not a ecclesiology and not a range. sent10: the wagonwright is a ecclesiology and/or it is a truncheon if something is not a range. sent11: that something is a Plasmodiophora but it does not gin SOP is wrong if it is not a truncheon. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if that the concierge is not a truncheon is true then the fact that the fact that it is a Plasmodiophora and it does not gin SOP is correct is incorrect.; sent7 & sent9 -> int2: the concierge is not a truncheon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the concierge is a Plasmodiophora but it does not gin SOP is incorrect.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__