the fact that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a dualism that comforts licenser is not correct it does not suffer is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a dualism and it does comfort licenser is false then it suffers. sent2: the smoothbore does not suffer if the fact that it is a dualism and does comfort licenser is false. sent3: the fact that the alienator does not draw keratoconus is true if that it is a kind of a Arlington that is incautious is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is a dualism that comforts licenser the fact that it does not suffer hold. sent5: if that the smoothbore is a kind of a Bermudan and it is a kind of a nombril is wrong then it does not comfort licenser. sent6: if that the smoothbore does not comfort licenser is correct it does not suffer. sent7: the smoothbore does not suffer if it is a dualism and it comforts licenser. sent8: the pyxie is not a kind of a significance if the fact that it is a Cairo and is a dualism does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a dualism then the fact that it does not suffer hold. sent10: the smoothbore does suffer if that that it is a dualism and comforts licenser is true is not right. sent11: something is not a seminarian if the fact that the fact that it does suffer and is a multitude hold is not correct. sent12: if the fact that the fact that the sartorius is not non-adenocarcinomatous and it plaits is not wrong is not correct it does not suffer. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not comfort licenser it does not suffer. sent14: the smoothbore does not reflectorize acarid if that it is a kind of seminal thing that is a kind of a dualism is wrong. sent15: if that the smoothbore is a Arlington that does comfort licenser is not correct it does not reflectorize pyxie.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the Serbian does suffer and is a kind of a multitude is not correct it is not a seminarian.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a dualism that comforts licenser is not correct it does not suffer is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a dualism and it does comfort licenser is false then it suffers. sent2: the smoothbore does not suffer if the fact that it is a dualism and does comfort licenser is false. sent3: the fact that the alienator does not draw keratoconus is true if that it is a kind of a Arlington that is incautious is false. sent4: there is something such that if it is a dualism that comforts licenser the fact that it does not suffer hold. sent5: if that the smoothbore is a kind of a Bermudan and it is a kind of a nombril is wrong then it does not comfort licenser. sent6: if that the smoothbore does not comfort licenser is correct it does not suffer. sent7: the smoothbore does not suffer if it is a dualism and it comforts licenser. sent8: the pyxie is not a kind of a significance if the fact that it is a Cairo and is a dualism does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a dualism then the fact that it does not suffer hold. sent10: the smoothbore does suffer if that that it is a dualism and comforts licenser is true is not right. sent11: something is not a seminarian if the fact that the fact that it does suffer and is a multitude hold is not correct. sent12: if the fact that the fact that the sartorius is not non-adenocarcinomatous and it plaits is not wrong is not correct it does not suffer. sent13: there exists something such that if it does not comfort licenser it does not suffer. sent14: the smoothbore does not reflectorize acarid if that it is a kind of seminal thing that is a kind of a dualism is wrong. sent15: if that the smoothbore is a Arlington that does comfort licenser is not correct it does not reflectorize pyxie. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__