the outskirts is not cyclonic.
sent1: the propjet is cyclonic. sent2: the latecomer is not glycogenic but it pigments. sent3: the hotspot sneers Triassic if it does not unionize spironolactone. sent4: the latecomer is an attainment. sent5: the outskirts is not parasitic. sent6: if something does sneer Triassic that it is not a kind of an attainment and is not parasitic is wrong. sent7: the contractor is not cyclonic. sent8: the latecomer is not parasitic if there are cyclonic things. sent9: that something is an attainment but it is not parasitic is incorrect if the fact that it does sneer Triassic is right. sent10: if something is not a pigment it is both a spoil and glycogenic. sent11: the outskirts is hepatic and not a Surya. sent12: either the latecomer is not non-cyclonic or it is parasitic or both. sent13: if the latecomer is not cyclonic then the outskirts is cyclonic. sent14: the outskirts does not clink Malthusianism. sent15: that the outskirts is not cyclonic is not wrong if there exists something such that it is parasitic. sent16: there exists something such that it is cyclonic and/or it is an attainment. sent17: if the fact that something is non-parasitic an attainment is not right then it is a hiddenness. sent18: something is not cyclonic if that it does not sneer Triassic and does unionize spironolactone does not hold. sent19: the outskirts does not pigment if it is hepatic thing that is not a kind of a Surya. sent20: if the latecomer is not cyclonic the fact that that the dioxide is not parasitic but it is an attainment is not wrong does not hold. sent21: if the latecomer is non-glycogenic but it is a pigment then it spoils.
sent4 -> int1: either the latecomer is parasitic or it is an attainment or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is parasitic or an attainment or both.;
the outskirts is cyclonic.
sent6 -> int3: that the hotspot is not an attainment and it is not parasitic is incorrect if the fact that it does not sneer Triassic is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the outskirts is not cyclonic. ; $context$ = sent1: the propjet is cyclonic. sent2: the latecomer is not glycogenic but it pigments. sent3: the hotspot sneers Triassic if it does not unionize spironolactone. sent4: the latecomer is an attainment. sent5: the outskirts is not parasitic. sent6: if something does sneer Triassic that it is not a kind of an attainment and is not parasitic is wrong. sent7: the contractor is not cyclonic. sent8: the latecomer is not parasitic if there are cyclonic things. sent9: that something is an attainment but it is not parasitic is incorrect if the fact that it does sneer Triassic is right. sent10: if something is not a pigment it is both a spoil and glycogenic. sent11: the outskirts is hepatic and not a Surya. sent12: either the latecomer is not non-cyclonic or it is parasitic or both. sent13: if the latecomer is not cyclonic then the outskirts is cyclonic. sent14: the outskirts does not clink Malthusianism. sent15: that the outskirts is not cyclonic is not wrong if there exists something such that it is parasitic. sent16: there exists something such that it is cyclonic and/or it is an attainment. sent17: if the fact that something is non-parasitic an attainment is not right then it is a hiddenness. sent18: something is not cyclonic if that it does not sneer Triassic and does unionize spironolactone does not hold. sent19: the outskirts does not pigment if it is hepatic thing that is not a kind of a Surya. sent20: if the latecomer is not cyclonic the fact that that the dioxide is not parasitic but it is an attainment is not wrong does not hold. sent21: if the latecomer is non-glycogenic but it is a pigment then it spoils. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: either the latecomer is parasitic or it is an attainment or both.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is parasitic or an attainment or both.; __UNKNOWN__