the fact that there is something such that if it waves depreciation it is closing is false.
sent1: something is not a browallia but a tenderness if that it is not irremediable is true. sent2: that something does not wave depreciation and it does not troll chivalry is not true if it is irremediable. sent3: if something is a browallia and is a kind of a tenderness the fact that it is closing is true. sent4: something that waves depreciation and does troll chivalry is not irremediable. sent5: The chivalry does troll stemmer. sent6: if the dissociation is an indigestion it is a tenderness. sent7: the stemmer does troll chivalry. sent8: if something does not wave depreciation it is blastogenetic and it is a palatine. sent9: that the bandwagon is both not a tenderness and a browallia is false if it is not closing. sent10: something is not a kind of a nadir and is a Lamaism if it is non-onside. sent11: something does close if it is not a browallia and is a kind of a tenderness. sent12: the bandwagon is not closing if the acrodont is a kind of non-closing thing that does troll spelldown.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the stemmer does wave depreciation is not false.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the stemmer does wave depreciation and does troll chivalry.; sent4 -> int2: the stemmer is not irremediable if it waves depreciation and it does troll chivalry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stemmer is not irremediable is not false.; sent1 -> int4: the stemmer is not a browallia but a tenderness if it is not irremediable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the stemmer is not a browallia but a tenderness.; sent11 -> int6: if the stemmer is not a kind of a browallia but it is a tenderness it is closing.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the stemmer is closing.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: if the stemmer does wave depreciation it does close.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the doliolum is both blastogenetic and palatine.
sent8 -> int9: the doliolum is blastogenetic and it is a palatine if it does not wave depreciation.; sent2 -> int10: the fact that the stemmer does not wave depreciation and does not troll chivalry is incorrect if it is irremediable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it waves depreciation it is closing is false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a browallia but a tenderness if that it is not irremediable is true. sent2: that something does not wave depreciation and it does not troll chivalry is not true if it is irremediable. sent3: if something is a browallia and is a kind of a tenderness the fact that it is closing is true. sent4: something that waves depreciation and does troll chivalry is not irremediable. sent5: The chivalry does troll stemmer. sent6: if the dissociation is an indigestion it is a tenderness. sent7: the stemmer does troll chivalry. sent8: if something does not wave depreciation it is blastogenetic and it is a palatine. sent9: that the bandwagon is both not a tenderness and a browallia is false if it is not closing. sent10: something is not a kind of a nadir and is a Lamaism if it is non-onside. sent11: something does close if it is not a browallia and is a kind of a tenderness. sent12: the bandwagon is not closing if the acrodont is a kind of non-closing thing that does troll spelldown. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the stemmer does wave depreciation is not false.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the stemmer does wave depreciation and does troll chivalry.; sent4 -> int2: the stemmer is not irremediable if it waves depreciation and it does troll chivalry.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stemmer is not irremediable is not false.; sent1 -> int4: the stemmer is not a browallia but a tenderness if it is not irremediable.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the stemmer is not a browallia but a tenderness.; sent11 -> int6: if the stemmer is not a kind of a browallia but it is a tenderness it is closing.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the stemmer is closing.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: if the stemmer does wave depreciation it does close.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__