the fact that the waterloo does not occur but the implying schist occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the superscribing counterattack does not occur and the chemosurgery does not occur. sent2: the fact that that the unsurmountableness and the art happens is correct does not hold if the stocking does not occur. sent3: the waterloo happens and/or the knuckling does not occur. sent4: the superscribing memento happens or the staining does not occur or both. sent5: if the hysterics does not occur and/or the superscribing noted does not occur the hysterics does not occur. sent6: the circumstances occurs. sent7: the physicochemicalness is brought about by the implying garrison. sent8: the scuff occurs. sent9: the sideswiping does not occur. sent10: that either the superscribing memento does not occur or the bandage does not occur or both leads to that the superscribing memento does not occur. sent11: if the sideswiping does not occur the implying garrison happens. sent12: the art does not occur if that the unsurmountableness happens and the art occurs is incorrect. sent13: the sideswipe occurs and the knuckling occurs if the tensileness does not occur. sent14: the stocking happens. sent15: the waterloo does not occur or the knuckle does not occur or both. sent16: the fact that the bearing decline does not occur is true. sent17: the fact that the implying schist happens is right if the Armenianness does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur. sent18: the kismet happens. sent19: the inefficaciousness does not occur and/or the lavishness does not occur. sent20: that the duplicity happens hold. sent21: the Armenian does not occur. sent22: that the unsurmountableness happens and the stocking occurs brings about that the physicochemicalness does not occur. sent23: that the waterloo does not occur and/or the knuckling does not occur prevents the waterloo. sent24: if the sideswiping happens then that the waterloo does not occur and the implying garrison happens is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unsurmountableness occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the unsurmountableness happens and the stocking happens.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the physicochemicalness does not occur.; sent11 & sent9 -> int3: the implying garrison happens.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the physicochemicalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the unsurmountableness does not occur is correct.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the Armenian does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the implying schist occurs.; sent23 & sent15 -> int9: the waterloo does not occur.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
that the waterloo does not occur but the implying schist occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the waterloo does not occur but the implying schist occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the superscribing counterattack does not occur and the chemosurgery does not occur. sent2: the fact that that the unsurmountableness and the art happens is correct does not hold if the stocking does not occur. sent3: the waterloo happens and/or the knuckling does not occur. sent4: the superscribing memento happens or the staining does not occur or both. sent5: if the hysterics does not occur and/or the superscribing noted does not occur the hysterics does not occur. sent6: the circumstances occurs. sent7: the physicochemicalness is brought about by the implying garrison. sent8: the scuff occurs. sent9: the sideswiping does not occur. sent10: that either the superscribing memento does not occur or the bandage does not occur or both leads to that the superscribing memento does not occur. sent11: if the sideswiping does not occur the implying garrison happens. sent12: the art does not occur if that the unsurmountableness happens and the art occurs is incorrect. sent13: the sideswipe occurs and the knuckling occurs if the tensileness does not occur. sent14: the stocking happens. sent15: the waterloo does not occur or the knuckle does not occur or both. sent16: the fact that the bearing decline does not occur is true. sent17: the fact that the implying schist happens is right if the Armenianness does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur. sent18: the kismet happens. sent19: the inefficaciousness does not occur and/or the lavishness does not occur. sent20: that the duplicity happens hold. sent21: the Armenian does not occur. sent22: that the unsurmountableness happens and the stocking occurs brings about that the physicochemicalness does not occur. sent23: that the waterloo does not occur and/or the knuckling does not occur prevents the waterloo. sent24: if the sideswiping happens then that the waterloo does not occur and the implying garrison happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unsurmountableness occurs.; assump1 & sent14 -> int1: the unsurmountableness happens and the stocking happens.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the physicochemicalness does not occur.; sent11 & sent9 -> int3: the implying garrison happens.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the physicochemicalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the unsurmountableness does not occur is correct.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the Armenian does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: the implying schist occurs.; sent23 & sent15 -> int9: the waterloo does not occur.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__