that there is something such that if it is a slicing then that it is a cultivator and it is not a glossalgia is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a slicing that it is a cultivator and it is a kind of a glossalgia is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it does wrestle Pteropus then the fact that it does stint temperament and is not interlocutory is false. sent3: the fact that something is a slicing that is not a pavage is not true if it is a kind of a Cameroonian. sent4: if the presbyope reshuffles the fact that it is a cultivator that is not a Balkan is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it does grumble faddist then that it is nonexistent and it does not stint Neolentinus does not hold. sent6: the fact that the tektite is arbitral but it is not a kind of a slicing does not hold if it is a kind of a catalectic. sent7: the fact that the tektite is both a cultivator and not a glossalgia is not correct if it is a kind of a slicing. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a slicing then it is a cultivator that is not a glossalgia. sent9: there exists something such that if it is inclusive then the fact that it is catalectic and it is not pessimistic is not true. sent10: the tektite is a cultivator and not a glossalgia if it does slice. sent11: if the tektite is a Bangkok the fact that it is a kind of Thoreauvian thing that is not a cultivator is not true. sent12: the fact that the fact that the provocateur is a kind of a sundowner and does not stint selfsameness is not incorrect does not hold if the fact that it is a glossalgia is right. sent13: the fact that the tektite is a cultivator and does not howl imposture is not true if it ulcerates. sent14: if the endocrine is hypothalamic that it howls felwort and does not stint Cardiff is incorrect. sent15: the fact that something is categorematic and is non-prelapsarian is not true if it does audition. sent16: there is something such that if it is ohmic then the fact that it is a kind of a sunflower that is not a caring is not right. sent17: if the tektite is a slicing the fact that it is a cultivator that is a glossalgia is not true. sent18: there is something such that if it is invisible then that it is a Tantalus and it does not howl felwort is false. sent19: there exists something such that if it pads that it is a kind of bulbaceous thing that does not stint teaspoon is not correct.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does audition the fact that it is a kind of categorematic thing that is non-prelapsarian does not hold.
sent15 -> int1: that the anaerobe is categorematic and is not prelapsarian is false if it is an audition.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a slicing then that it is a cultivator and it is not a glossalgia is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a slicing that it is a cultivator and it is a kind of a glossalgia is false. sent2: there exists something such that if it does wrestle Pteropus then the fact that it does stint temperament and is not interlocutory is false. sent3: the fact that something is a slicing that is not a pavage is not true if it is a kind of a Cameroonian. sent4: if the presbyope reshuffles the fact that it is a cultivator that is not a Balkan is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it does grumble faddist then that it is nonexistent and it does not stint Neolentinus does not hold. sent6: the fact that the tektite is arbitral but it is not a kind of a slicing does not hold if it is a kind of a catalectic. sent7: the fact that the tektite is both a cultivator and not a glossalgia is not correct if it is a kind of a slicing. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a slicing then it is a cultivator that is not a glossalgia. sent9: there exists something such that if it is inclusive then the fact that it is catalectic and it is not pessimistic is not true. sent10: the tektite is a cultivator and not a glossalgia if it does slice. sent11: if the tektite is a Bangkok the fact that it is a kind of Thoreauvian thing that is not a cultivator is not true. sent12: the fact that the fact that the provocateur is a kind of a sundowner and does not stint selfsameness is not incorrect does not hold if the fact that it is a glossalgia is right. sent13: the fact that the tektite is a cultivator and does not howl imposture is not true if it ulcerates. sent14: if the endocrine is hypothalamic that it howls felwort and does not stint Cardiff is incorrect. sent15: the fact that something is categorematic and is non-prelapsarian is not true if it does audition. sent16: there is something such that if it is ohmic then the fact that it is a kind of a sunflower that is not a caring is not right. sent17: if the tektite is a slicing the fact that it is a cultivator that is a glossalgia is not true. sent18: there is something such that if it is invisible then that it is a Tantalus and it does not howl felwort is false. sent19: there exists something such that if it pads that it is a kind of bulbaceous thing that does not stint teaspoon is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__