the fact that the mastodon is a kind of a myelography and it does alternate is not incorrect.
sent1: the fact that everything does impart or it is a Drake or both is true. sent2: the compilation is alternate. sent3: there exists something such that it does slave Sayda and is a kind of a kino. sent4: there is something such that it is a kino. sent5: something is a myelography and is moonlit if it is not supernaturalist. sent6: if something that does not slave Sayda is a kino then the compilation is not supernaturalist. sent7: if that the llama is not non-moonlit is not wrong it does not slave Sayda. sent8: there exists something such that it does not slave Sayda. sent9: if the Arkansan imparts then the compilation is supernaturalist. sent10: if the Arkansan is a Drake the compilation is supernaturalist. sent11: something does not slave Sayda but it is a kino if it is not non-moonlit. sent12: if the llama is not moonlit then that the mastodon is a myelography and alternates is not true.
sent11 -> int1: the llama does not slave Sayda and is a kino if it is moonlit.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the llama is moonlit.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the llama does not slave Sayda and is a kino.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does not slave Sayda and it is a kino.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the compilation is not supernaturalist is true.; sent1 -> int5: the Arkansan imparts and/or it is a Drake.; int5 & sent9 & sent10 -> int6: the compilation is supernaturalist.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the llama is not moonlit.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the mastodon is a kind of a myelography and it alternates.
sent5 -> int9: if the mastodon is non-supernaturalist it is a myelography and it is moonlit.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the mastodon is a kind of a myelography and it does alternate is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that everything does impart or it is a Drake or both is true. sent2: the compilation is alternate. sent3: there exists something such that it does slave Sayda and is a kind of a kino. sent4: there is something such that it is a kino. sent5: something is a myelography and is moonlit if it is not supernaturalist. sent6: if something that does not slave Sayda is a kino then the compilation is not supernaturalist. sent7: if that the llama is not non-moonlit is not wrong it does not slave Sayda. sent8: there exists something such that it does not slave Sayda. sent9: if the Arkansan imparts then the compilation is supernaturalist. sent10: if the Arkansan is a Drake the compilation is supernaturalist. sent11: something does not slave Sayda but it is a kino if it is not non-moonlit. sent12: if the llama is not moonlit then that the mastodon is a myelography and alternates is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the llama does not slave Sayda and is a kino if it is moonlit.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the llama is moonlit.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the llama does not slave Sayda and is a kino.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it does not slave Sayda and it is a kino.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the compilation is not supernaturalist is true.; sent1 -> int5: the Arkansan imparts and/or it is a Drake.; int5 & sent9 & sent10 -> int6: the compilation is supernaturalist.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the llama is not moonlit.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__