the schizanthus is not protrusive and does undulate.
sent1: the schizanthus is non-anthropometric thing that does undulate. sent2: the nainsook is a mistress. sent3: if the chill is not foliaceous it is inactive and it is asynchronous. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not asynchronous is true the abnegator is not a bathymeter. sent5: if the fact that either something does not deny mohawk or it is not a kind of a exactness or both is wrong then it does beckon abnegator. sent6: The abnegator does beckon schizanthus. sent7: the fact that the chill is not foliaceous is right. sent8: if the schizanthus beckons abnegator it either is not a mistress or does not deny nainsook or both. sent9: if something is a kind of a prawn then it is not protrusive and it undulates. sent10: if the schizanthus is not protrusive it is a kind of a confidence. sent11: that the schizanthus undulates is not incorrect. sent12: something does prawn if it does not deny nainsook. sent13: if the chill is not active but asynchronous then the bootmaker is not asynchronous. sent14: the kangaroo's-foot beckons abnegator if it does not tint heathfowl. sent15: the stemmer is agrologic if that it is not a mistress is not false. sent16: the schizanthus undulates if it does prawn. sent17: something does undulate if it is a prawn. sent18: that the schizanthus is a kind of non-protrusive thing that undulates does not hold if the inmate does not deny nainsook. sent19: the schizanthus does beckon abnegator. sent20: that if the schizanthus does not undulate then the schizanthus is phlegmy hold. sent21: if the yuppie does not prawn it does fare. sent22: the fact that the Junkers does not deny mohawk and/or it is not a exactness does not hold if the abnegator is not a bathymeter. sent23: if the chervil does not deny nainsook or it is a kind of a prawn or both then the inmate does not deny nainsook.
sent8 & sent19 -> int1: the fact that the schizanthus is not a mistress and/or does not deny nainsook is true.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the schizanthus is a kind of a prawn is not incorrect if it does not deny nainsook.; sent9 -> int3: the schizanthus is non-protrusive but it does undulate if it does prawn.;
that the schizanthus is not protrusive but it does undulate is not true.
sent5 -> int4: the Junkers does beckon abnegator if that either it does not deny mohawk or it is not a exactness or both is not true.; sent3 & sent7 -> int5: the chill is a kind of inactive thing that is asynchronous.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the bootmaker is not asynchronous.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is not asynchronous.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the abnegator is not a bathymeter.; sent22 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the Junkers does not deny mohawk and/or is not a kind of a exactness is not right.; int4 & int9 -> int10: the Junkers does beckon abnegator.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does beckon abnegator.;
$hypothesis$ = the schizanthus is not protrusive and does undulate. ; $context$ = sent1: the schizanthus is non-anthropometric thing that does undulate. sent2: the nainsook is a mistress. sent3: if the chill is not foliaceous it is inactive and it is asynchronous. sent4: if there is something such that that it is not asynchronous is true the abnegator is not a bathymeter. sent5: if the fact that either something does not deny mohawk or it is not a kind of a exactness or both is wrong then it does beckon abnegator. sent6: The abnegator does beckon schizanthus. sent7: the fact that the chill is not foliaceous is right. sent8: if the schizanthus beckons abnegator it either is not a mistress or does not deny nainsook or both. sent9: if something is a kind of a prawn then it is not protrusive and it undulates. sent10: if the schizanthus is not protrusive it is a kind of a confidence. sent11: that the schizanthus undulates is not incorrect. sent12: something does prawn if it does not deny nainsook. sent13: if the chill is not active but asynchronous then the bootmaker is not asynchronous. sent14: the kangaroo's-foot beckons abnegator if it does not tint heathfowl. sent15: the stemmer is agrologic if that it is not a mistress is not false. sent16: the schizanthus undulates if it does prawn. sent17: something does undulate if it is a prawn. sent18: that the schizanthus is a kind of non-protrusive thing that undulates does not hold if the inmate does not deny nainsook. sent19: the schizanthus does beckon abnegator. sent20: that if the schizanthus does not undulate then the schizanthus is phlegmy hold. sent21: if the yuppie does not prawn it does fare. sent22: the fact that the Junkers does not deny mohawk and/or it is not a exactness does not hold if the abnegator is not a bathymeter. sent23: if the chervil does not deny nainsook or it is a kind of a prawn or both then the inmate does not deny nainsook. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent19 -> int1: the fact that the schizanthus is not a mistress and/or does not deny nainsook is true.; sent12 -> int2: the fact that the schizanthus is a kind of a prawn is not incorrect if it does not deny nainsook.; sent9 -> int3: the schizanthus is non-protrusive but it does undulate if it does prawn.; __UNKNOWN__