the fact that there is something such that if it is non-dysphemistic and not a cashbox then it does not plaster is false.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is non-aerolitic and it is not a kind of a bridgehead then it is patronymic. sent2: if the grit is not a cashbox and does not riposte slattern then it does not own crith. sent3: the toupee does plaster if it is non-dysphemistic thing that is not a cashbox. sent4: the toupee is not a plastering if it is non-dysphemistic thing that is not a cashbox. sent5: there is something such that if it does not riposte talc and it is able it is not a gooseneck. sent6: the toupee is not a kind of a plastering if it is dysphemistic and it is not a kind of a cashbox. sent7: there is something such that if it does not formalize abfarad and it does own Romanism then that it is not a flowchart is true. sent8: if something is not aplitic and it is not a kind of a Procyonidae it is not abactinal. sent9: the slattern is not a flowchart if it is not a kind of a cashbox and it is preventable. sent10: the bath does not plaster if it does not own Bacon and does not formalize menopause. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a gooseneck and is not a kind of a lowerclassman it is a prostitution. sent12: that there exists something such that if it is dysphemistic and it is not a cashbox then it does not plaster hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a spin and it is not pious it ripostes bath. sent14: the Bohemian is not a gooseneck if it is not a kind of a peer and does formalize Gaborone.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-aplitic thing that is not a Procyonidae then it is not abactinal.
sent8 -> int1: if the spiracle is not aplitic and it is not a Procyonidae then it is not abactinal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is non-dysphemistic and not a cashbox then it does not plaster is false. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is non-aerolitic and it is not a kind of a bridgehead then it is patronymic. sent2: if the grit is not a cashbox and does not riposte slattern then it does not own crith. sent3: the toupee does plaster if it is non-dysphemistic thing that is not a cashbox. sent4: the toupee is not a plastering if it is non-dysphemistic thing that is not a cashbox. sent5: there is something such that if it does not riposte talc and it is able it is not a gooseneck. sent6: the toupee is not a kind of a plastering if it is dysphemistic and it is not a kind of a cashbox. sent7: there is something such that if it does not formalize abfarad and it does own Romanism then that it is not a flowchart is true. sent8: if something is not aplitic and it is not a kind of a Procyonidae it is not abactinal. sent9: the slattern is not a flowchart if it is not a kind of a cashbox and it is preventable. sent10: the bath does not plaster if it does not own Bacon and does not formalize menopause. sent11: there exists something such that if it is not a gooseneck and is not a kind of a lowerclassman it is a prostitution. sent12: that there exists something such that if it is dysphemistic and it is not a cashbox then it does not plaster hold. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a spin and it is not pious it ripostes bath. sent14: the Bohemian is not a gooseneck if it is not a kind of a peer and does formalize Gaborone. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__