the airway is not a mugginess.
sent1: the fact that the agnostic is not a kind of a taper or it is predestinarian or both is not true. sent2: if there is something such that it is not predestinarian the airway is not gyral and does not letter meatus. sent3: the medlar is a mugginess. sent4: if the airway is not a lockage it does earth. sent5: if there are non-implicit things then the cog is both non-intercellular and not expansive. sent6: if the medlar is not predestinarian it is a mugginess. sent7: if something is not predestinarian then the fact that it does not reset toasting and/or it does still drilled does not hold. sent8: the fact that the airway is a mugginess is right if it is not a autoplasty. sent9: the fact that the ledge is not a Ustinov or it is a mugginess or both is not right. sent10: the airway is a mugginess if the fact that the medlar does not reset toasting and/or does still drilled is not correct. sent11: the fact that the NADP does not reset toasting and is not Malthusian hold. sent12: something is not a lockage. sent13: there is something such that it is not a demon. sent14: the medlar is not an ideologist and it is not predestinarian if something is not a lockage. sent15: the medlar is effervescent thing that is not collegiate if there exists something such that it does not still dystrophy. sent16: the fact that the medlar is an ideologist but it is not a lockage is not correct if it is predestinarian. sent17: the bonavist is a kind of a mugginess if that the fact that the medlar is an ideologist but it is not a lockage is not right is right. sent18: the sluicegate is a mugginess. sent19: there is something such that it is not a kind of an ideologist. sent20: if the fact that the masturbation does still drilled and is predestinarian is wrong then the airway is not predestinarian.
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the medlar is not an ideologist and is not predestinarian.; int1 -> int2: the medlar is not predestinarian.; sent7 -> int3: the fact that the medlar does not reset toasting and/or it does still drilled is false if the fact that it is non-predestinarian is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the medlar does not reset toasting and/or does still drilled is not right.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the airway is not a mugginess.
$hypothesis$ = the airway is not a mugginess. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the agnostic is not a kind of a taper or it is predestinarian or both is not true. sent2: if there is something such that it is not predestinarian the airway is not gyral and does not letter meatus. sent3: the medlar is a mugginess. sent4: if the airway is not a lockage it does earth. sent5: if there are non-implicit things then the cog is both non-intercellular and not expansive. sent6: if the medlar is not predestinarian it is a mugginess. sent7: if something is not predestinarian then the fact that it does not reset toasting and/or it does still drilled does not hold. sent8: the fact that the airway is a mugginess is right if it is not a autoplasty. sent9: the fact that the ledge is not a Ustinov or it is a mugginess or both is not right. sent10: the airway is a mugginess if the fact that the medlar does not reset toasting and/or does still drilled is not correct. sent11: the fact that the NADP does not reset toasting and is not Malthusian hold. sent12: something is not a lockage. sent13: there is something such that it is not a demon. sent14: the medlar is not an ideologist and it is not predestinarian if something is not a lockage. sent15: the medlar is effervescent thing that is not collegiate if there exists something such that it does not still dystrophy. sent16: the fact that the medlar is an ideologist but it is not a lockage is not correct if it is predestinarian. sent17: the bonavist is a kind of a mugginess if that the fact that the medlar is an ideologist but it is not a lockage is not right is right. sent18: the sluicegate is a mugginess. sent19: there is something such that it is not a kind of an ideologist. sent20: if the fact that the masturbation does still drilled and is predestinarian is wrong then the airway is not predestinarian. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent14 -> int1: the medlar is not an ideologist and is not predestinarian.; int1 -> int2: the medlar is not predestinarian.; sent7 -> int3: the fact that the medlar does not reset toasting and/or it does still drilled is false if the fact that it is non-predestinarian is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the medlar does not reset toasting and/or does still drilled is not right.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__