the unstuckness does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that not the rigmarole but the vestal happens is wrong then the vestal does not occur. sent2: that the aldermanicness but not the subartesianness happens brings about that the spiccato does not occur. sent3: that the goading occurs brings about the non-subartesianness. sent4: the floralness does not occur. sent5: if the defraying quaintness occurs then the canvassing occurs. sent6: if the fact that the clocking calcium does not occur and the revealing sellout does not occur is not true the goad occurs. sent7: that the debarkation does not occur leads to that both the side-glance and the terrorization happens. sent8: the stuckness is caused by that the canvassing does not occur. sent9: if the misconduct and the vestal happens then the canvassing does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the scratching and the salving fetch occurs is not right if the fact that the floralness does not occur is true. sent11: that the vestalness occurs is true. sent12: that both the unstuckness and the misconduct occurs is triggered by that the vestalness does not occur. sent13: if the salving coucal does not occur or the beaconing happens or both the defraying quaintness occurs. sent14: if the side-glance happens either the salving coucal does not occur or the beaconing occurs or both. sent15: the misconduct happens. sent16: the slam does not occur if the fact that the scratching occurs and the salving fetch occurs is not correct. sent17: if the slam does not occur the aldermanicness occurs and the sunburst happens. sent18: that the interreflection but not the debarkation happens is triggered by that the spiccato does not occur.
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: the misconduct happens and the vestalness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the canvassing does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the unstuckness happens hold.
sent10 & sent4 -> int3: that the fact that the scratch and the salving fetch occurs is false is correct.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the slamming does not occur.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the aldermanicness occurs and the sunburst happens.; int5 -> int6: the fact that the aldermanicness happens is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the unstuckness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that not the rigmarole but the vestal happens is wrong then the vestal does not occur. sent2: that the aldermanicness but not the subartesianness happens brings about that the spiccato does not occur. sent3: that the goading occurs brings about the non-subartesianness. sent4: the floralness does not occur. sent5: if the defraying quaintness occurs then the canvassing occurs. sent6: if the fact that the clocking calcium does not occur and the revealing sellout does not occur is not true the goad occurs. sent7: that the debarkation does not occur leads to that both the side-glance and the terrorization happens. sent8: the stuckness is caused by that the canvassing does not occur. sent9: if the misconduct and the vestal happens then the canvassing does not occur. sent10: the fact that both the scratching and the salving fetch occurs is not right if the fact that the floralness does not occur is true. sent11: that the vestalness occurs is true. sent12: that both the unstuckness and the misconduct occurs is triggered by that the vestalness does not occur. sent13: if the salving coucal does not occur or the beaconing happens or both the defraying quaintness occurs. sent14: if the side-glance happens either the salving coucal does not occur or the beaconing occurs or both. sent15: the misconduct happens. sent16: the slam does not occur if the fact that the scratching occurs and the salving fetch occurs is not correct. sent17: if the slam does not occur the aldermanicness occurs and the sunburst happens. sent18: that the interreflection but not the debarkation happens is triggered by that the spiccato does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: the misconduct happens and the vestalness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the canvassing does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__