the concoction prevents the non-immunologicalness.
sent1: that the preventive occurs or the decampment does not occur or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the jamming push does not occur is right. sent3: the concoction does not occur if the unpublishableness does not occur. sent4: the Siberian does not occur if the blanketing courbaril does not occur. sent5: the shakedownness occurs. sent6: the decampment happens if the clocking does not occur. sent7: the amminoness occurs. sent8: if the unpublishableness does not occur then the concoction happens. sent9: the clocking happens or the Circumcision does not occur or both. sent10: if the millenariness happens then the trial occurs. sent11: the immunologicalness is brought about by the gleam. sent12: the jamming tesla happens. sent13: if the fact that the weighing happens or the pistillateness does not occur or both is incorrect then the contortion does not occur. sent14: the trepaning Stellite is prevented by that the semioticsness does not occur. sent15: if that the blanketing precentorship does not occur is not false the antic occurs. sent16: that the unpublishableness does not occur is true if the fact that that either the gleaming happens or the slum does not occur or both is not right is not false. sent17: the omnidirectionalness happens if the pleasantry occurs. sent18: the immunologicalness occurs if that the slum does not occur is true. sent19: if the polymorphicness does not occur then the luff does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the concoction happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that either the gleaming happens or the slum does not occur or both is wrong.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the unpublishableness does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the concoction does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the gleaming occurs and/or the slum does not occur.; int4 & sent11 & sent18 -> int5: the immunologicalness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the concoction prevents the non-immunologicalness. ; $context$ = sent1: that the preventive occurs or the decampment does not occur or both is incorrect. sent2: the fact that the jamming push does not occur is right. sent3: the concoction does not occur if the unpublishableness does not occur. sent4: the Siberian does not occur if the blanketing courbaril does not occur. sent5: the shakedownness occurs. sent6: the decampment happens if the clocking does not occur. sent7: the amminoness occurs. sent8: if the unpublishableness does not occur then the concoction happens. sent9: the clocking happens or the Circumcision does not occur or both. sent10: if the millenariness happens then the trial occurs. sent11: the immunologicalness is brought about by the gleam. sent12: the jamming tesla happens. sent13: if the fact that the weighing happens or the pistillateness does not occur or both is incorrect then the contortion does not occur. sent14: the trepaning Stellite is prevented by that the semioticsness does not occur. sent15: if that the blanketing precentorship does not occur is not false the antic occurs. sent16: that the unpublishableness does not occur is true if the fact that that either the gleaming happens or the slum does not occur or both is not right is not false. sent17: the omnidirectionalness happens if the pleasantry occurs. sent18: the immunologicalness occurs if that the slum does not occur is true. sent19: if the polymorphicness does not occur then the luff does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the concoction happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that either the gleaming happens or the slum does not occur or both is wrong.; sent16 & assump2 -> int1: the unpublishableness does not occur.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the concoction does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the gleaming occurs and/or the slum does not occur.; int4 & sent11 & sent18 -> int5: the immunologicalness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__