the persistentness does not occur.
sent1: the fact that not the nay but the eutherianness occurs does not hold. sent2: if the exportableness occurs then the counterrevolution occurs. sent3: that the avoidance happens and the foraging airstream happens leads to the non-persistentness. sent4: the hotness occurs if that the hotness does not occur and the self-flagellation does not occur is not true. sent5: the exportableness happens. sent6: the fact that the fact that both the farness and the zymoidness happens hold is wrong if the sunset does not occur. sent7: the exportableness happens and the flexure occurs. sent8: the heating does not occur if the fact that both the strafing and the heating happens is not true. sent9: if the fact that the farness happens and the zymoidness happens is not true the farness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the avoidance does not occur hold that the hotness does not occur and the self-flagellation does not occur is wrong. sent11: either the flexure does not occur or the heeling bollworm does not occur or both if the foraging airstream does not occur. sent12: if the follies does not occur that the medicine does not occur and the sunset occurs is false. sent13: that the algorithm but not the follies happens is caused by that the bordering Elijah does not occur. sent14: that the foraging airstream happens is prevented by that the eutherianness does not occur and the nay does not occur. sent15: if both the heeling bollworm and the flexure happens then the self-flagellation does not occur. sent16: the eutherianness does not occur and the nay does not occur if the heating does not occur. sent17: if that not the nay but the eutherianness occurs is wrong then the erectingness happens. sent18: that the sunset happens is false if that that the medicine does not occur and the sunset happens is right is wrong. sent19: if the farness does not occur then the fact that the strafe occurs and the heating happens does not hold. sent20: that the heeling bollworm does not occur leads to that the avoidance happens. sent21: the self-flagellation occurs. sent22: the persistentness and the exportableness occurs if the flexure does not occur. sent23: that the erectingness occurs brings about that the foraging airstream occurs.
sent7 -> int1: the flexure happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heeling bollworm happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heeling bollworm occurs and the flexure occurs.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the self-flagellation does not occur.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the heeling bollworm does not occur.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the avoidance occurs.; sent17 & sent1 -> int7: the erectingness occurs.; sent23 & int7 -> int8: the foraging airstream occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: both the avoidance and the foraging airstream occurs.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the persistentness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the persistentness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the nay but the eutherianness occurs does not hold. sent2: if the exportableness occurs then the counterrevolution occurs. sent3: that the avoidance happens and the foraging airstream happens leads to the non-persistentness. sent4: the hotness occurs if that the hotness does not occur and the self-flagellation does not occur is not true. sent5: the exportableness happens. sent6: the fact that the fact that both the farness and the zymoidness happens hold is wrong if the sunset does not occur. sent7: the exportableness happens and the flexure occurs. sent8: the heating does not occur if the fact that both the strafing and the heating happens is not true. sent9: if the fact that the farness happens and the zymoidness happens is not true the farness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the avoidance does not occur hold that the hotness does not occur and the self-flagellation does not occur is wrong. sent11: either the flexure does not occur or the heeling bollworm does not occur or both if the foraging airstream does not occur. sent12: if the follies does not occur that the medicine does not occur and the sunset occurs is false. sent13: that the algorithm but not the follies happens is caused by that the bordering Elijah does not occur. sent14: that the foraging airstream happens is prevented by that the eutherianness does not occur and the nay does not occur. sent15: if both the heeling bollworm and the flexure happens then the self-flagellation does not occur. sent16: the eutherianness does not occur and the nay does not occur if the heating does not occur. sent17: if that not the nay but the eutherianness occurs is wrong then the erectingness happens. sent18: that the sunset happens is false if that that the medicine does not occur and the sunset happens is right is wrong. sent19: if the farness does not occur then the fact that the strafe occurs and the heating happens does not hold. sent20: that the heeling bollworm does not occur leads to that the avoidance happens. sent21: the self-flagellation occurs. sent22: the persistentness and the exportableness occurs if the flexure does not occur. sent23: that the erectingness occurs brings about that the foraging airstream occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the flexure happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the heeling bollworm happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heeling bollworm occurs and the flexure occurs.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the self-flagellation does not occur.; int3 & sent21 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the heeling bollworm does not occur.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the avoidance occurs.; sent17 & sent1 -> int7: the erectingness occurs.; sent23 & int7 -> int8: the foraging airstream occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: both the avoidance and the foraging airstream occurs.; int9 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__