the paint does assume.
sent1: if the paint does vault nepotism that either it is not lobular or it is not a T-bar or both is not true. sent2: something is not a kind of a T-bar if that it is a kind of a sack and it is a Myrmeleon is not true. sent3: the fact that the apojove is not a lace and not a oleoresin is wrong. sent4: everything is a singleton that does exude. sent5: if there is something such that that it is not lobular and/or is not a T-bar is not true the apojove is a kind of a Myrmeleon. sent6: if the paint laces that it does assume is not false. sent7: something is lobular and does not vault nepotism if it is not a kind of a T-bar. sent8: the paint does not assume if the apojove does not assume and it is not a kind of a lace. sent9: if the apojove is a kind of a singleton then that the paint is lobular and does not vault nepotism is not right. sent10: the paint vaults nepotism if the dika does vaults nepotism. sent11: the paint does not vault nepotism. sent12: if the paint is not a lace that it is a sack and a Myrmeleon is wrong. sent13: if that something is not a lace and it is not a oleoresin is not right then it is a kind of a oleoresin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paint is not a lace.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the paint is a kind of a sack and it is a kind of a Myrmeleon is incorrect.; sent2 -> int2: the paint is not a T-bar if that it is a kind of a sack and it is a kind of a Myrmeleon is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the paint is not a T-bar.; sent7 -> int4: if the paint is not a T-bar then it is lobular and it does not vault nepotism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the paint is lobular and does not vault nepotism.; sent4 -> int6: the apojove is a singleton and it exudes.; int6 -> int7: the apojove is a singleton.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the paint is lobular and does not vault nepotism is false.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the paint is a kind of a lace.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the paint does not assume.
$hypothesis$ = the paint does assume. ; $context$ = sent1: if the paint does vault nepotism that either it is not lobular or it is not a T-bar or both is not true. sent2: something is not a kind of a T-bar if that it is a kind of a sack and it is a Myrmeleon is not true. sent3: the fact that the apojove is not a lace and not a oleoresin is wrong. sent4: everything is a singleton that does exude. sent5: if there is something such that that it is not lobular and/or is not a T-bar is not true the apojove is a kind of a Myrmeleon. sent6: if the paint laces that it does assume is not false. sent7: something is lobular and does not vault nepotism if it is not a kind of a T-bar. sent8: the paint does not assume if the apojove does not assume and it is not a kind of a lace. sent9: if the apojove is a kind of a singleton then that the paint is lobular and does not vault nepotism is not right. sent10: the paint vaults nepotism if the dika does vaults nepotism. sent11: the paint does not vault nepotism. sent12: if the paint is not a lace that it is a sack and a Myrmeleon is wrong. sent13: if that something is not a lace and it is not a oleoresin is not right then it is a kind of a oleoresin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paint is not a lace.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the paint is a kind of a sack and it is a kind of a Myrmeleon is incorrect.; sent2 -> int2: the paint is not a T-bar if that it is a kind of a sack and it is a kind of a Myrmeleon is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the paint is not a T-bar.; sent7 -> int4: if the paint is not a T-bar then it is lobular and it does not vault nepotism.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the paint is lobular and does not vault nepotism.; sent4 -> int6: the apojove is a singleton and it exudes.; int6 -> int7: the apojove is a singleton.; sent9 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the paint is lobular and does not vault nepotism is false.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the paint is a kind of a lace.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__