the fact that the peppermint is a kind of a AI hold if the philosopher is a kind of a caster.
sent1: the cock-a-leekie is cinerary and it is a AI. sent2: the fact that the raiser is airworthy is not false. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Illecebrum. sent4: there exists something such that it is not apostrophic and it is not Tudor. sent5: that the peppermint is amnestic is not incorrect. sent6: the peppermint is a Illecebrum. sent7: there is something such that that it is not a Illecebrum and it is not a AI is not right. sent8: the peppermint is apostrophic if the philosopher is a Illecebrum. sent9: if a caster is a kind of a AI then the philosopher is a Illecebrum. sent10: if a caster is a Illecebrum the peppermint is a AI. sent11: there exists something such that that it is apostrophic and it is not a Tudor is false. sent12: there is something such that it is Aeolian and mingles backlash. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is non-apostrophic thing that is non-Tudor is not true the philosopher is a Illecebrum. sent14: if the philosopher is a kind of a AI the peppermint is a Illecebrum. sent15: something does exclude cock-a-leekie and it is acneiform. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not a caster and it is not a AI is false the peppermint is a Illecebrum. sent17: there is something such that that it is not apostrophic but a Tudor is not correct. sent18: the philosopher is a kind of a Illecebrum if the peppermint is a Tudor. sent19: there is something such that it is a caster. sent20: if there is something such that it is apostrophic then the philosopher is a kind of a Illecebrum.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the peppermint is a kind of a AI hold if the philosopher is a kind of a caster. ; $context$ = sent1: the cock-a-leekie is cinerary and it is a AI. sent2: the fact that the raiser is airworthy is not false. sent3: there exists something such that it is a Illecebrum. sent4: there exists something such that it is not apostrophic and it is not Tudor. sent5: that the peppermint is amnestic is not incorrect. sent6: the peppermint is a Illecebrum. sent7: there is something such that that it is not a Illecebrum and it is not a AI is not right. sent8: the peppermint is apostrophic if the philosopher is a Illecebrum. sent9: if a caster is a kind of a AI then the philosopher is a Illecebrum. sent10: if a caster is a Illecebrum the peppermint is a AI. sent11: there exists something such that that it is apostrophic and it is not a Tudor is false. sent12: there is something such that it is Aeolian and mingles backlash. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is non-apostrophic thing that is non-Tudor is not true the philosopher is a Illecebrum. sent14: if the philosopher is a kind of a AI the peppermint is a Illecebrum. sent15: something does exclude cock-a-leekie and it is acneiform. sent16: if there exists something such that that it is not a caster and it is not a AI is false the peppermint is a Illecebrum. sent17: there is something such that that it is not apostrophic but a Tudor is not correct. sent18: the philosopher is a kind of a Illecebrum if the peppermint is a Tudor. sent19: there is something such that it is a caster. sent20: if there is something such that it is apostrophic then the philosopher is a kind of a Illecebrum. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__