the fact that if the seawardness does not occur then the fact that the defoliating maar and the tacticalness happens is false is not right.
sent1: the fact that both the tactfulness and the pleasure occurs is not right if the hungering does not occur. sent2: the fact that the blending does not occur is true. sent3: the lysogenicness occurs if the servileness happens. sent4: that the hunger happens but the lineman does not occur triggers the ball-buster. sent5: that the seawardness does not occur results in that both the defoliating maar and the tacticalness happens. sent6: if the fact that the loss does not occur but the photosyntheticness happens does not hold the fewestness does not occur. sent7: the idolization happens. sent8: the glomming fleawort occurs. sent9: the defoliating cotyledon occurs if both the complecting iron-grey and the seawardness happens. sent10: the flooding does not occur if that the procuring occurs is not false. sent11: that that not the procuring but the glomming saddlebill occurs hold does not hold. sent12: that the stridulation occurs and the discussion happens is wrong if the voltaicness does not occur. sent13: the gouging occurs. sent14: that the defoliating cotyledon occurs is prevented by that the flooding does not occur and the lysogenicness occurs. sent15: the servileness occurs. sent16: the complecting antifeminist does not occur. sent17: that the procuring happens and the glomming saddlebill happens is wrong. sent18: if the insulating occurs then the fact that the complecting iron-grey happens is true. sent19: the flooding does not occur if the fact that not the procuring but the glomming saddlebill occurs does not hold. sent20: that both the felineness and the paternalness occurs is false if the glomming jobcentre does not occur. sent21: if the lineman does not occur but the fattening occurs then that the fact that the complecting tidy occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent22: if the complecting iron-grey and the non-seawardness happens then the fact that the defoliating cotyledon happens is not incorrect. sent23: the fact that the defoliating maar happens and the tacticalness occurs does not hold if that the insulating does not occur is not false. sent24: the fact that the defoliating maar happens and the tacticalness occurs does not hold if the fact that the seawardness happens hold. sent25: the bifurcation but not the receipting occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the insulating happens hold.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: the complecting iron-grey occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seawardness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the complecting iron-grey and the non-seawardness happens.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the defoliating cotyledon happens.; sent19 & sent11 -> int4: the flooding does not occur.; sent3 & sent15 -> int5: that the lysogenicness happens is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the flooding but the lysogenicness happens.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the defoliating cotyledon does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: that the insulating does not occur is true.; int9 & sent23 -> int10: the fact that the defoliating maar and the tacticalness occurs is incorrect.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the seawardness does not occur then the fact that the defoliating maar and the tacticalness happens is false is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the tactfulness and the pleasure occurs is not right if the hungering does not occur. sent2: the fact that the blending does not occur is true. sent3: the lysogenicness occurs if the servileness happens. sent4: that the hunger happens but the lineman does not occur triggers the ball-buster. sent5: that the seawardness does not occur results in that both the defoliating maar and the tacticalness happens. sent6: if the fact that the loss does not occur but the photosyntheticness happens does not hold the fewestness does not occur. sent7: the idolization happens. sent8: the glomming fleawort occurs. sent9: the defoliating cotyledon occurs if both the complecting iron-grey and the seawardness happens. sent10: the flooding does not occur if that the procuring occurs is not false. sent11: that that not the procuring but the glomming saddlebill occurs hold does not hold. sent12: that the stridulation occurs and the discussion happens is wrong if the voltaicness does not occur. sent13: the gouging occurs. sent14: that the defoliating cotyledon occurs is prevented by that the flooding does not occur and the lysogenicness occurs. sent15: the servileness occurs. sent16: the complecting antifeminist does not occur. sent17: that the procuring happens and the glomming saddlebill happens is wrong. sent18: if the insulating occurs then the fact that the complecting iron-grey happens is true. sent19: the flooding does not occur if the fact that not the procuring but the glomming saddlebill occurs does not hold. sent20: that both the felineness and the paternalness occurs is false if the glomming jobcentre does not occur. sent21: if the lineman does not occur but the fattening occurs then that the fact that the complecting tidy occurs is not correct is not wrong. sent22: if the complecting iron-grey and the non-seawardness happens then the fact that the defoliating cotyledon happens is not incorrect. sent23: the fact that the defoliating maar happens and the tacticalness occurs does not hold if that the insulating does not occur is not false. sent24: the fact that the defoliating maar happens and the tacticalness occurs does not hold if the fact that the seawardness happens hold. sent25: the bifurcation but not the receipting occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the insulating happens hold.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: the complecting iron-grey occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seawardness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the complecting iron-grey and the non-seawardness happens.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the defoliating cotyledon happens.; sent19 & sent11 -> int4: the flooding does not occur.; sent3 & sent15 -> int5: that the lysogenicness happens is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: not the flooding but the lysogenicness happens.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the defoliating cotyledon does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int8 -> int9: that the insulating does not occur is true.; int9 & sent23 -> int10: the fact that the defoliating maar and the tacticalness occurs is incorrect.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__