there exists something such that if it does not denaturalize abjurer it is not a metonymy and it is a kind of an ingot.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does not denaturalize abjurer hold it is a kind of a metonymy and it is an ingot. sent2: if something is not a kind of a metonymy that it is not trustful and denaturalizes wombat is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a dope then it hurtles evocation and is a word. sent4: something is not a metonymy but an ingot if it denaturalizes abjurer. sent5: there exists something such that if it does denaturalize abjurer it is not a kind of a metonymy and it is an ingot. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not denaturalize abjurer is not incorrect it is not a kind of a metonymy. sent7: if the car-ferry is cross-sentential then it does not denaturalize abjurer and is anaphoric. sent8: the car-ferry is not a kind of a metonymy if it does not denaturalize abjurer. sent9: if something is not fraternal it is a nuisance.
the orthodontist is a kind of non-trustful thing that denaturalizes wombat if it is not a kind of a metonymy.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not denaturalize abjurer it is not a metonymy and it is a kind of an ingot. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that it does not denaturalize abjurer hold it is a kind of a metonymy and it is an ingot. sent2: if something is not a kind of a metonymy that it is not trustful and denaturalizes wombat is not false. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a dope then it hurtles evocation and is a word. sent4: something is not a metonymy but an ingot if it denaturalizes abjurer. sent5: there exists something such that if it does denaturalize abjurer it is not a kind of a metonymy and it is an ingot. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not denaturalize abjurer is not incorrect it is not a kind of a metonymy. sent7: if the car-ferry is cross-sentential then it does not denaturalize abjurer and is anaphoric. sent8: the car-ferry is not a kind of a metonymy if it does not denaturalize abjurer. sent9: if something is not fraternal it is a nuisance. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__