the fact that the housekeeping cress does not occur if the fact that the bidirectionalness occurs is not incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the argumentativeness occurs hold. sent2: if both the argumentativeness and the bidirectionalness happens the housekeeping cress does not occur. sent3: if the extensiveness does not occur then that the fact that not the bidirectionalness but the housekeeping cress occurs is right is wrong. sent4: the depletion does not occur if the argumentativeness does not occur. sent5: the lumpectomy does not occur if the relacing Dravidian occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bidirectionalness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the argumentativeness happens and the bidirectionalness occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the housekeeping cress does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the depletion does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the housekeeping cress does not occur if the fact that the bidirectionalness occurs is not incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the argumentativeness occurs hold. sent2: if both the argumentativeness and the bidirectionalness happens the housekeeping cress does not occur. sent3: if the extensiveness does not occur then that the fact that not the bidirectionalness but the housekeeping cress occurs is right is wrong. sent4: the depletion does not occur if the argumentativeness does not occur. sent5: the lumpectomy does not occur if the relacing Dravidian occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bidirectionalness occurs.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the argumentativeness happens and the bidirectionalness occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the housekeeping cress does not occur.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__