the senega tries.
sent1: the fact that the calliope does not severalize rib and does not manhandle AAS is wrong. sent2: if the kike is not a garnish then that it does not severalize serictery and is ropy is wrong. sent3: the ptyalism is a butterwort if the calliope is stemless. sent4: the fact that the kike does severalize levorotation and is not a kind of a ampere-minute does not hold if it is a butterwort. sent5: if the fact that something does not severalize rib and it does not manhandle AAS is not right then it is stemless. sent6: if something that is a ampere-minute is a butterwort then the senega tries. sent7: if something does catholicize it severalizes levorotation. sent8: the kike is not a garnish. sent9: if the fact that the kike does not severalize serictery but it is ropy is not right the rib does catholicize. sent10: that if that the rib severalizes levorotation is not false then the ptyalism is a ampere-minute hold.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that that the kike does not severalize serictery but it is ropy hold does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the rib catholicizes.; sent7 -> int3: the rib does severalize levorotation if it catholicizes.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the rib does severalize levorotation.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the ptyalism is a ampere-minute.; sent5 -> int6: the calliope is stemless if that it does not severalize rib and does not manhandle AAS is not true.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the calliope is stemless.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the ptyalism is a kind of a butterwort.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the ptyalism is both a ampere-minute and a butterwort.; int9 -> int10: something is a ampere-minute and is a kind of a butterwort.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the senega does not try.
$hypothesis$ = the senega tries. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the calliope does not severalize rib and does not manhandle AAS is wrong. sent2: if the kike is not a garnish then that it does not severalize serictery and is ropy is wrong. sent3: the ptyalism is a butterwort if the calliope is stemless. sent4: the fact that the kike does severalize levorotation and is not a kind of a ampere-minute does not hold if it is a butterwort. sent5: if the fact that something does not severalize rib and it does not manhandle AAS is not right then it is stemless. sent6: if something that is a ampere-minute is a butterwort then the senega tries. sent7: if something does catholicize it severalizes levorotation. sent8: the kike is not a garnish. sent9: if the fact that the kike does not severalize serictery but it is ropy is not right the rib does catholicize. sent10: that if that the rib severalizes levorotation is not false then the ptyalism is a ampere-minute hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that that the kike does not severalize serictery but it is ropy hold does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the rib catholicizes.; sent7 -> int3: the rib does severalize levorotation if it catholicizes.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the rib does severalize levorotation.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the ptyalism is a ampere-minute.; sent5 -> int6: the calliope is stemless if that it does not severalize rib and does not manhandle AAS is not true.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the calliope is stemless.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the ptyalism is a kind of a butterwort.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the ptyalism is both a ampere-minute and a butterwort.; int9 -> int10: something is a ampere-minute and is a kind of a butterwort.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__