the ultramicroscope is not catholic and it is not euphonious.
sent1: the perineum is not a dot-com. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a dot-com and clanks implicitness then the icecream is catholic. sent3: there exists something such that it does fragment headliner. sent4: if there is something such that it fragments headliner the fact that the nailhead is not intramolecular or it is not hateful or both is not true. sent5: that the ultramicroscope is not catholic and it is not euphonious is not correct if the icecream is catholic. sent6: the perineum is not a dot-com and does clank implicitness if the nailhead is not a dot-com. sent7: something is not a dot-com if the fact that it is not intramolecular or is not hateful or both does not hold.
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the nailhead is not intramolecular or is not hateful or both does not hold.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the nailhead is not a kind of a dot-com is not false if the fact that it is not intramolecular or not hateful or both is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nailhead is not dot-com.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the perineum is not a dot-com but it clanks implicitness.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a dot-com and it does clank implicitness.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the icecream is catholic is correct.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the ultramicroscope is not catholic and it is not euphonious. ; $context$ = sent1: the perineum is not a dot-com. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a dot-com and clanks implicitness then the icecream is catholic. sent3: there exists something such that it does fragment headliner. sent4: if there is something such that it fragments headliner the fact that the nailhead is not intramolecular or it is not hateful or both is not true. sent5: that the ultramicroscope is not catholic and it is not euphonious is not correct if the icecream is catholic. sent6: the perineum is not a dot-com and does clank implicitness if the nailhead is not a dot-com. sent7: something is not a dot-com if the fact that it is not intramolecular or is not hateful or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the nailhead is not intramolecular or is not hateful or both does not hold.; sent7 -> int2: the fact that the nailhead is not a kind of a dot-com is not false if the fact that it is not intramolecular or not hateful or both is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the nailhead is not dot-com.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the perineum is not a dot-com but it clanks implicitness.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that it is not a dot-com and it does clank implicitness.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the icecream is catholic is correct.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__