the chaetodon is bulbar.
sent1: that the chaetodon is not bulbar hold if that the WIMP chocks tinderbox but it is not bulbar does not hold. sent2: that the fact that the killdeer is a kind of a Egyptian and does not embower is right is not right. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of Egyptian thing that does not embower does not hold if that it is a screenplay hold. sent4: the killdeer is not hemiparasitic. sent5: the WIMP chocks tinderbox if the killdeer is a Egyptian. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not unpunctual the WIMP is both not flimsy and not hemiparasitic. sent7: that something is not a Egyptian and does not embower does not hold if it is a screenplay. sent8: if the canoe is a snood then that it is a screenplay and it is not a Zionist does not hold. sent9: if the WIMP is a screenplay but not hemiparasitic the chaetodon is a screenplay. sent10: that that something is both a Egyptian and not hemiparasitic is not incorrect is wrong if it is a screenplay. sent11: if the WIMP does chock tinderbox the chaetodon is bulbar. sent12: that the killdeer is not bulbar and does embower is wrong. sent13: the chaetodon does rubify. sent14: something does chock tinderbox and it is a screenplay if it is not bulbar. sent15: the evening-snow is not unpunctual but hypnotic if it is xerographic. sent16: that the killdeer is Egyptian thing that does not embower is not right if it is a kind of a screenplay. sent17: if the killdeer is not hemiparasitic it is a screenplay. sent18: the evening-snow is xerographic. sent19: if the chaetodon is bulbar then that it does not embower and it is not a kind of a Egyptian does not hold.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the killdeer is non-Egyptian thing that does not embower is wrong if the fact that it is a screenplay is not incorrect.; sent17 & sent4 -> int2: the killdeer is a kind of a screenplay.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the killdeer is non-Egyptian thing that does not embower is not incorrect is incorrect.;
the chaetodon is not bulbar.
$hypothesis$ = the chaetodon is bulbar. ; $context$ = sent1: that the chaetodon is not bulbar hold if that the WIMP chocks tinderbox but it is not bulbar does not hold. sent2: that the fact that the killdeer is a kind of a Egyptian and does not embower is right is not right. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of Egyptian thing that does not embower does not hold if that it is a screenplay hold. sent4: the killdeer is not hemiparasitic. sent5: the WIMP chocks tinderbox if the killdeer is a Egyptian. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not unpunctual the WIMP is both not flimsy and not hemiparasitic. sent7: that something is not a Egyptian and does not embower does not hold if it is a screenplay. sent8: if the canoe is a snood then that it is a screenplay and it is not a Zionist does not hold. sent9: if the WIMP is a screenplay but not hemiparasitic the chaetodon is a screenplay. sent10: that that something is both a Egyptian and not hemiparasitic is not incorrect is wrong if it is a screenplay. sent11: if the WIMP does chock tinderbox the chaetodon is bulbar. sent12: that the killdeer is not bulbar and does embower is wrong. sent13: the chaetodon does rubify. sent14: something does chock tinderbox and it is a screenplay if it is not bulbar. sent15: the evening-snow is not unpunctual but hypnotic if it is xerographic. sent16: that the killdeer is Egyptian thing that does not embower is not right if it is a kind of a screenplay. sent17: if the killdeer is not hemiparasitic it is a screenplay. sent18: the evening-snow is xerographic. sent19: if the chaetodon is bulbar then that it does not embower and it is not a kind of a Egyptian does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the killdeer is non-Egyptian thing that does not embower is wrong if the fact that it is a screenplay is not incorrect.; sent17 & sent4 -> int2: the killdeer is a kind of a screenplay.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the killdeer is non-Egyptian thing that does not embower is not incorrect is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__