the midwife is inefficient and/or it does Simonize EPA.
sent1: the bronchus unbuttons Polyborus if there exists something such that it is a preventive. sent2: there exists something such that it is a preventive. sent3: if the bronchus does not unbutton Polyborus that the midwife is inefficient and/or it does unbutton Polyborus does not hold. sent4: there is something such that it does Simonize EPA. sent5: the fact that if the fact that something does not unbutton Stevenson and it does not Simonize chromate does not hold it is a Belisarius is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the congee does not Simonize EPA is right if a thunderbird unbuttons Polyborus. sent7: the midwife is not inefficient if the congee does not Simonize EPA. sent8: that the bronchus does not unbutton Stevenson and does not Simonize chromate does not hold if there is something such that it does Simonize pairing. sent9: there exists something such that it Simonizes pairing. sent10: something is a kind of a thunderbird if it is a Belisarius. sent11: that the midwife is inefficient and/or it Simonizes EPA is not correct if the congee does not Simonizes EPA. sent12: the pendulum is a thunderbird.
sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the bronchus does not unbutton Stevenson and does not Simonize chromate is wrong.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the bronchus does not unbutton Stevenson and does not Simonize chromate is incorrect then it is a kind of a Belisarius.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the bronchus is a Belisarius is correct.; sent10 -> int4: the bronchus is a thunderbird if it is a Belisarius.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bronchus is a thunderbird.; sent2 & sent1 -> int6: the bronchus does unbutton Polyborus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bronchus does thunder and it does unbutton Polyborus.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a kind of a thunderbird that unbuttons Polyborus.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the congee does not Simonize EPA.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the midwife is inefficient and/or it does Simonize EPA. ; $context$ = sent1: the bronchus unbuttons Polyborus if there exists something such that it is a preventive. sent2: there exists something such that it is a preventive. sent3: if the bronchus does not unbutton Polyborus that the midwife is inefficient and/or it does unbutton Polyborus does not hold. sent4: there is something such that it does Simonize EPA. sent5: the fact that if the fact that something does not unbutton Stevenson and it does not Simonize chromate does not hold it is a Belisarius is not wrong. sent6: the fact that the congee does not Simonize EPA is right if a thunderbird unbuttons Polyborus. sent7: the midwife is not inefficient if the congee does not Simonize EPA. sent8: that the bronchus does not unbutton Stevenson and does not Simonize chromate does not hold if there is something such that it does Simonize pairing. sent9: there exists something such that it Simonizes pairing. sent10: something is a kind of a thunderbird if it is a Belisarius. sent11: that the midwife is inefficient and/or it Simonizes EPA is not correct if the congee does not Simonizes EPA. sent12: the pendulum is a thunderbird. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the bronchus does not unbutton Stevenson and does not Simonize chromate is wrong.; sent5 -> int2: if the fact that the bronchus does not unbutton Stevenson and does not Simonize chromate is incorrect then it is a kind of a Belisarius.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the bronchus is a Belisarius is correct.; sent10 -> int4: the bronchus is a thunderbird if it is a Belisarius.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bronchus is a thunderbird.; sent2 & sent1 -> int6: the bronchus does unbutton Polyborus.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bronchus does thunder and it does unbutton Polyborus.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a kind of a thunderbird that unbuttons Polyborus.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the congee does not Simonize EPA.; int9 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__