the patriot is not amoristic.
sent1: if the fact that the pollster is a albite is not incorrect the barrels is a seek. sent2: there exists something such that it is a Bel and it is a unilateralism. sent3: the barrels does seek if the pollster is a unilateralism. sent4: the pollster is a kind of a albite if there is something such that it is both not a Bel and a unilateralism. sent5: something is a seek if it is a albite. sent6: the barrels is a albite if the pollster is a kind of a unilateralism. sent7: if the patriot is not a kind of a yak then the fact that the pollster frazzles and is indiscriminate does not hold. sent8: there is something such that that it is a unilateralism hold. sent9: that the barrels is not a kind of a Bel hold. sent10: the patriot is amoristic if the pollster is a seek. sent11: the barrels is not a Bel but it is a unilateralism. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Bel. sent13: if the barrels is a kind of a albite it is a unilateralism. sent14: something is a albite and it is a seek if it is not amoristic.
sent11 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a Bel and is a kind of a unilateralism.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the pollster is a albite.; sent5 -> int3: if the pollster is a albite then that it is a seek is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the pollster seeks is right.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the hamlet is a kind of a albite.
sent14 -> int5: the hamlet is both a albite and a seek if that it is not amoristic hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the patriot is not amoristic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the pollster is a albite is not incorrect the barrels is a seek. sent2: there exists something such that it is a Bel and it is a unilateralism. sent3: the barrels does seek if the pollster is a unilateralism. sent4: the pollster is a kind of a albite if there is something such that it is both not a Bel and a unilateralism. sent5: something is a seek if it is a albite. sent6: the barrels is a albite if the pollster is a kind of a unilateralism. sent7: if the patriot is not a kind of a yak then the fact that the pollster frazzles and is indiscriminate does not hold. sent8: there is something such that that it is a unilateralism hold. sent9: that the barrels is not a kind of a Bel hold. sent10: the patriot is amoristic if the pollster is a seek. sent11: the barrels is not a Bel but it is a unilateralism. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Bel. sent13: if the barrels is a kind of a albite it is a unilateralism. sent14: something is a albite and it is a seek if it is not amoristic. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a Bel and is a kind of a unilateralism.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the pollster is a albite.; sent5 -> int3: if the pollster is a albite then that it is a seek is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the pollster seeks is right.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__