the aquiculturalness does not occur.
sent1: the unworthiness occurs if the intenseness does not occur. sent2: that the liftoff does not occur is not false. sent3: if the housekeeping herrerasaur does not occur then the fact that the sellout does not occur and the emmetropicness does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the adducentness does not occur is right if the fact that the aquiculturalness happens and the adducentness occurs is not right. sent5: the freeze-drying call-back occurs if the emmetropicness does not occur and the care does not occur. sent6: if the myringotomy does not occur and the freeze-drying call-back does not occur the aquiculturalness occurs. sent7: that the sellout does not occur or the housekeeping herrerasaur does not occur or both prevents the sellout. sent8: that the aquiculturalness and the myringotomy happens prevents that the freeze-drying call-back occurs. sent9: that the leptosporangiateness occurs leads to that the intenseness does not occur and the embellishment does not occur. sent10: that the sellout does not occur and/or the housekeeping herrerasaur does not occur is caused by the unworthiness. sent11: the fact that the emmetropicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the emmetropicness occurs and the care occurs is triggered by that the sellout does not occur. sent13: the caring does not occur. sent14: if the myringotomy does not occur that that the aquiculturalness occurs and the adducentness occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent15: the myringotomy occurs. sent16: if the embellishment occurs then the intenseness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aquiculturalness happens.; assump1 & sent15 -> int1: both the aquiculturalness and the myringotomy occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the freeze-drying call-back does not occur.; sent11 & sent13 -> int3: the emmetropicness does not occur and the caring does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the freeze-drying call-back occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the aquiculturalness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the aquiculturalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the unworthiness occurs if the intenseness does not occur. sent2: that the liftoff does not occur is not false. sent3: if the housekeeping herrerasaur does not occur then the fact that the sellout does not occur and the emmetropicness does not occur does not hold. sent4: that the adducentness does not occur is right if the fact that the aquiculturalness happens and the adducentness occurs is not right. sent5: the freeze-drying call-back occurs if the emmetropicness does not occur and the care does not occur. sent6: if the myringotomy does not occur and the freeze-drying call-back does not occur the aquiculturalness occurs. sent7: that the sellout does not occur or the housekeeping herrerasaur does not occur or both prevents the sellout. sent8: that the aquiculturalness and the myringotomy happens prevents that the freeze-drying call-back occurs. sent9: that the leptosporangiateness occurs leads to that the intenseness does not occur and the embellishment does not occur. sent10: that the sellout does not occur and/or the housekeeping herrerasaur does not occur is caused by the unworthiness. sent11: the fact that the emmetropicness does not occur is not incorrect. sent12: that the emmetropicness occurs and the care occurs is triggered by that the sellout does not occur. sent13: the caring does not occur. sent14: if the myringotomy does not occur that that the aquiculturalness occurs and the adducentness occurs does not hold is not incorrect. sent15: the myringotomy occurs. sent16: if the embellishment occurs then the intenseness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aquiculturalness happens.; assump1 & sent15 -> int1: both the aquiculturalness and the myringotomy occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the freeze-drying call-back does not occur.; sent11 & sent13 -> int3: the emmetropicness does not occur and the caring does not occur.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the freeze-drying call-back occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__