there exists something such that if the fact that it is not Palladian is correct it is not macrobiotic and does beckon sandwich.
sent1: that there is something such that if the fact that it is Palladian is not incorrect it is not macrobiotic and it does beckon sandwich is correct. sent2: something is not cyclic and is Palladian if it does not gesticulate Boccaccio. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is not Palladian is not wrong it is macrobiotic thing that beckons sandwich. sent4: the Lancastrian is not macrobiotic but it beckons sandwich if it is non-Palladian. sent5: the Lancastrian is a kind of macrobiotic thing that does beckon sandwich if it is not Palladian. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a antitauon then it is not nonimitative and is a shiftlessness.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
the bugler is not cyclic and is Palladian if it does not gesticulate Boccaccio.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not Palladian is correct it is not macrobiotic and does beckon sandwich. ; $context$ = sent1: that there is something such that if the fact that it is Palladian is not incorrect it is not macrobiotic and it does beckon sandwich is correct. sent2: something is not cyclic and is Palladian if it does not gesticulate Boccaccio. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is not Palladian is not wrong it is macrobiotic thing that beckons sandwich. sent4: the Lancastrian is not macrobiotic but it beckons sandwich if it is non-Palladian. sent5: the Lancastrian is a kind of macrobiotic thing that does beckon sandwich if it is not Palladian. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a antitauon then it is not nonimitative and is a shiftlessness. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__