the fact that the vaginalness occurs and the keystroke does not occur is right.
sent1: the ray happens if the fact that the fact that the virileness does not occur or the granulation does not occur or both does not hold hold. sent2: the rearing heist does not occur if the fact that the fact that the loading nummulite but not the bucket occurs is true is incorrect. sent3: if that the virileness happens and/or the granulation does not occur does not hold then the ray occurs. sent4: the fact that the cleaving fishpond does not occur hold. sent5: if the acceptiveness does not occur both the mercuricness and the non-virileness happens. sent6: the custody occurs if the fact that the anticoagulativeness does not occur or the cleaving bulletin does not occur or both is wrong. sent7: that that the virileness does not occur and/or the granulation does not occur is wrong is not false. sent8: the ray happens if that either the virileness does not occur or the granulation happens or both is not right. sent9: the raying does not occur if the fact that the fact that the vaginalness occurs and the keystroke does not occur is incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: the acceptiveness does not occur if that that the presentation does not occur and the rupture occurs is not incorrect does not hold. sent11: the transgression does not occur. sent12: the vaginalness occurs. sent13: that not the presentation but the rupture happens is not correct if the custody happens. sent14: that either the anticoagulativeness does not occur or the cleaving bulletin does not occur or both is not right if the caesuralness does not occur. sent15: the ray does not occur if the vaginalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the vaginalness happens and the keystroke does not occur is wrong.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the ray does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: the ray occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the vaginalness but not the keystroke happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the vaginalness occurs and the keystroke does not occur is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the ray happens if the fact that the fact that the virileness does not occur or the granulation does not occur or both does not hold hold. sent2: the rearing heist does not occur if the fact that the fact that the loading nummulite but not the bucket occurs is true is incorrect. sent3: if that the virileness happens and/or the granulation does not occur does not hold then the ray occurs. sent4: the fact that the cleaving fishpond does not occur hold. sent5: if the acceptiveness does not occur both the mercuricness and the non-virileness happens. sent6: the custody occurs if the fact that the anticoagulativeness does not occur or the cleaving bulletin does not occur or both is wrong. sent7: that that the virileness does not occur and/or the granulation does not occur is wrong is not false. sent8: the ray happens if that either the virileness does not occur or the granulation happens or both is not right. sent9: the raying does not occur if the fact that the fact that the vaginalness occurs and the keystroke does not occur is incorrect is not incorrect. sent10: the acceptiveness does not occur if that that the presentation does not occur and the rupture occurs is not incorrect does not hold. sent11: the transgression does not occur. sent12: the vaginalness occurs. sent13: that not the presentation but the rupture happens is not correct if the custody happens. sent14: that either the anticoagulativeness does not occur or the cleaving bulletin does not occur or both is not right if the caesuralness does not occur. sent15: the ray does not occur if the vaginalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the vaginalness happens and the keystroke does not occur is wrong.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the ray does not occur.; sent1 & sent7 -> int2: the ray occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__