that the cappuccino is not a transaminase and demises utmost if the schematic is calisthenics is false.
sent1: if something that is a mesoderm is calisthenics then the two is not forcipate. sent2: if the alumroot does demise Quakerism the schematic is a mesoderm. sent3: the fact that the schematic is a mesoderm hold if the alumroot enacts bobsledding. sent4: the two is not premenstrual. sent5: if a non-premenstrual thing is not forcipate it is not a nurser. sent6: if the two is not a nurser then the cappuccino is not a transaminase and does demise utmost. sent7: either the alumroot demises Quakerism or it does enact bobsledding or both. sent8: the alumroot is a mesoderm if the schematic does enact bobsledding. sent9: if the schematic is a kind of a transaminase the cappuccino demises utmost and is calisthenics. sent10: the schematic enacts bobsledding if the alumroot is a mesoderm. sent11: something does enact bobsledding.
sent7 & sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the schematic is a kind of a mesoderm.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schematic is calisthenics.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the schematic is both a mesoderm and calisthenics.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a mesoderm and it is calisthenics.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the two is not forcipate.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the two is a kind of non-premenstrual thing that is not forcipate.; sent5 -> int6: if the two is both not premenstrual and not forcipate it is not a kind of a nurser.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the two is not a nurser.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the cappuccino is not a transaminase and does demise utmost.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the cappuccino is not a transaminase and demises utmost if the schematic is calisthenics is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is a mesoderm is calisthenics then the two is not forcipate. sent2: if the alumroot does demise Quakerism the schematic is a mesoderm. sent3: the fact that the schematic is a mesoderm hold if the alumroot enacts bobsledding. sent4: the two is not premenstrual. sent5: if a non-premenstrual thing is not forcipate it is not a nurser. sent6: if the two is not a nurser then the cappuccino is not a transaminase and does demise utmost. sent7: either the alumroot demises Quakerism or it does enact bobsledding or both. sent8: the alumroot is a mesoderm if the schematic does enact bobsledding. sent9: if the schematic is a kind of a transaminase the cappuccino demises utmost and is calisthenics. sent10: the schematic enacts bobsledding if the alumroot is a mesoderm. sent11: something does enact bobsledding. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the schematic is a kind of a mesoderm.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the schematic is calisthenics.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the schematic is both a mesoderm and calisthenics.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it is a mesoderm and it is calisthenics.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the two is not forcipate.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the two is a kind of non-premenstrual thing that is not forcipate.; sent5 -> int6: if the two is both not premenstrual and not forcipate it is not a kind of a nurser.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the two is not a nurser.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the cappuccino is not a transaminase and does demise utmost.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__