the gatherer is not bucolic.
sent1: if something does surround then the fact that the palm is non-bucolic thing that is pediatric does not hold. sent2: the Balkan does surround and it is a matchbook if it is not a demand. sent3: if the cordierite is a kind of a spokeswoman the fact that the fact that the gatherer is meager or it is non-auscultatory or both is not incorrect does not hold. sent4: something is bucolic if the fact that it is meager and/or not auscultatory is incorrect. sent5: the gatherer is not a kind of a spokeswoman if there is something such that it is bucolic and is a kind of a clapperboard. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a spokeswoman the fact that either the cordierite is auscultatory or it does not cap buddleia or both is not correct. sent7: the palm is a archaism and it is a kind of a clapperboard. sent8: if the fact that something is not bucolic but pediatric is not right then it is bucolic. sent9: the Balkan is not a kind of a demand. sent10: the cordierite is a spokeswoman.
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that either the gatherer is meager or it is not auscultatory or both is not correct.; sent4 -> int2: if that the gatherer is meager or it is not auscultatory or both is not correct it is bucolic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cordierite is auscultatory and/or does not cap buddleia does not hold.
sent8 -> int3: the palm is bucolic if the fact that it is not bucolic but pediatric is not right.; sent2 & sent9 -> int4: the Balkan does surround and is a matchbook.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the Balkan does surround hold.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it surrounds.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the palm is not bucolic and is pediatric is incorrect.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the palm is not non-bucolic.; sent7 -> int9: the palm is a clapperboard.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the palm is bucolic and is a clapperboard.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it is bucolic thing that is a clapperboard.; int11 & sent5 -> int12: the gatherer is not a spokeswoman.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is not a spokeswoman.; int13 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the gatherer is not bucolic. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does surround then the fact that the palm is non-bucolic thing that is pediatric does not hold. sent2: the Balkan does surround and it is a matchbook if it is not a demand. sent3: if the cordierite is a kind of a spokeswoman the fact that the fact that the gatherer is meager or it is non-auscultatory or both is not incorrect does not hold. sent4: something is bucolic if the fact that it is meager and/or not auscultatory is incorrect. sent5: the gatherer is not a kind of a spokeswoman if there is something such that it is bucolic and is a kind of a clapperboard. sent6: if there exists something such that it is not a spokeswoman the fact that either the cordierite is auscultatory or it does not cap buddleia or both is not correct. sent7: the palm is a archaism and it is a kind of a clapperboard. sent8: if the fact that something is not bucolic but pediatric is not right then it is bucolic. sent9: the Balkan is not a kind of a demand. sent10: the cordierite is a spokeswoman. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that either the gatherer is meager or it is not auscultatory or both is not correct.; sent4 -> int2: if that the gatherer is meager or it is not auscultatory or both is not correct it is bucolic.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__