the Wampanoag does chance shackle.
sent1: if the fact that something does incriminate awkwardness and it is vagile is false it is not a potentiometer. sent2: something that is not a Haley and not a Parsee does not incriminate pastorale. sent3: the shackle is asleep and is not unconquerable if the salvinorin is not a potentiometer. sent4: that the shackle is both an avenue and a soar is not true if the pleasure is not a lost-and-found. sent5: if that something does not chance shackle and it is not asleep does not hold it does chance shackle. sent6: the salvinorin does not assail Maltese. sent7: if the fact that something is an avenue and does soar is incorrect then it is not a Haley. sent8: something is a potentiometer if that it is conquerable thing that is not a potentiometer does not hold. sent9: the pleasure is a seventy-eight and it assails Vela. sent10: if the fact that the Wampanoag does incriminate awkwardness and is unconquerable is incorrect it does not chance shackle. sent11: the shackle is asleep. sent12: the Wampanoag is not asleep if the fact that it does chance shackle and it is unconquerable is incorrect. sent13: the shackle does not incriminate Kurdistan but it does page sharkskin. sent14: the fact that the Wampanoag does not chance shackle is not wrong if the shackle is asleep but it is not unconquerable. sent15: if the pleasure is a kind of a seventy-eight that does assail Vela it is not a lost-and-found. sent16: the salvinorin is not a kind of a potentiometer if it is not vagile. sent17: if something is a potentiometer then that it does not chance shackle and it is not asleep does not hold. sent18: the beading is hydrometric but it is not unconquerable. sent19: the fact that the salvinorin incriminates awkwardness and is vagile is not right. sent20: if the shackle does not incriminate Kurdistan and pages sharkskin then it is not a kind of a Parsee. sent21: if something is not vagile it is not a potentiometer. sent22: that the salvinorin is vagile and it is unconquerable is not correct.
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the salvinorin incriminates awkwardness and it is vagile does not hold then it is not a potentiometer.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the salvinorin is not a potentiometer.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the shackle is asleep thing that is not unconquerable.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the Wampanoag does chance shackle.
sent5 -> int4: the Wampanoag chances shackle if the fact that it does not chances shackle and it is non-asleep is not true.; sent17 -> int5: if the Wampanoag is a kind of a potentiometer then the fact that it does not chance shackle and it is not asleep is wrong.; sent8 -> int6: the Wampanoag is a potentiometer if that it is not unconquerable and not a potentiometer is not true.; sent2 -> int7: if the fact that the shackle is both not a Haley and not a Parsee is not incorrect then that it does not incriminate pastorale is true.; sent7 -> int8: if the fact that the shackle is an avenue and it is a soar is wrong it is not a Haley.; sent15 & sent9 -> int9: the pleasure is not a kind of a lost-and-found.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the shackle is a kind of an avenue and it is a kind of a soar is not true.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the shackle is not a kind of a Haley.; sent20 & sent13 -> int12: the shackle is not a kind of a Parsee.; int11 & int12 -> int13: the shackle is not a Haley and it is not a Parsee.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the shackle does not incriminate pastorale.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it does not incriminate pastorale.;
$hypothesis$ = the Wampanoag does chance shackle. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does incriminate awkwardness and it is vagile is false it is not a potentiometer. sent2: something that is not a Haley and not a Parsee does not incriminate pastorale. sent3: the shackle is asleep and is not unconquerable if the salvinorin is not a potentiometer. sent4: that the shackle is both an avenue and a soar is not true if the pleasure is not a lost-and-found. sent5: if that something does not chance shackle and it is not asleep does not hold it does chance shackle. sent6: the salvinorin does not assail Maltese. sent7: if the fact that something is an avenue and does soar is incorrect then it is not a Haley. sent8: something is a potentiometer if that it is conquerable thing that is not a potentiometer does not hold. sent9: the pleasure is a seventy-eight and it assails Vela. sent10: if the fact that the Wampanoag does incriminate awkwardness and is unconquerable is incorrect it does not chance shackle. sent11: the shackle is asleep. sent12: the Wampanoag is not asleep if the fact that it does chance shackle and it is unconquerable is incorrect. sent13: the shackle does not incriminate Kurdistan but it does page sharkskin. sent14: the fact that the Wampanoag does not chance shackle is not wrong if the shackle is asleep but it is not unconquerable. sent15: if the pleasure is a kind of a seventy-eight that does assail Vela it is not a lost-and-found. sent16: the salvinorin is not a kind of a potentiometer if it is not vagile. sent17: if something is a potentiometer then that it does not chance shackle and it is not asleep does not hold. sent18: the beading is hydrometric but it is not unconquerable. sent19: the fact that the salvinorin incriminates awkwardness and is vagile is not right. sent20: if the shackle does not incriminate Kurdistan and pages sharkskin then it is not a kind of a Parsee. sent21: if something is not vagile it is not a potentiometer. sent22: that the salvinorin is vagile and it is unconquerable is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the fact that the salvinorin incriminates awkwardness and it is vagile does not hold then it is not a potentiometer.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the salvinorin is not a potentiometer.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the shackle is asleep thing that is not unconquerable.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__