that the curbstone does not become policy is correct.
sent1: something is non-unsold thing that is not unlivable if it is not a kind of a proconsulship. sent2: if the cosmotron is both not a procedure and not Melanesian the saurel is not unlivable. sent3: that the curbstone does not become policy is true if that the fact that the cosmotron is not a procedure and it is not Melanesian is incorrect is true. sent4: the sutler is not unlivable. sent5: if the sutler is not unlivable the saurel is unlivable. sent6: that the sutler becomes policy hold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is cleistogamous and not a Salk is incorrect. sent8: something is not a proconsulship and it does not attenuate if it is non-cleistogamous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cosmotron is not a kind of a procedure and is not Melanesian.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the saurel is not unlivable.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the saurel is unlivable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the cosmotron is not a procedure and it is not Melanesian is incorrect.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the curbstone does become policy is right.
sent1 -> int5: if the cosmotron is not a proconsulship then it is not unsold and it is not unlivable.; sent8 -> int6: the cosmotron is not a proconsulship and does not attenuate if it is not cleistogamous.;
$hypothesis$ = that the curbstone does not become policy is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is non-unsold thing that is not unlivable if it is not a kind of a proconsulship. sent2: if the cosmotron is both not a procedure and not Melanesian the saurel is not unlivable. sent3: that the curbstone does not become policy is true if that the fact that the cosmotron is not a procedure and it is not Melanesian is incorrect is true. sent4: the sutler is not unlivable. sent5: if the sutler is not unlivable the saurel is unlivable. sent6: that the sutler becomes policy hold. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is cleistogamous and not a Salk is incorrect. sent8: something is not a proconsulship and it does not attenuate if it is non-cleistogamous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cosmotron is not a kind of a procedure and is not Melanesian.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the saurel is not unlivable.; sent5 & sent4 -> int2: the saurel is unlivable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the cosmotron is not a procedure and it is not Melanesian is incorrect.; int4 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__