either the collaring incident does not occur or the collaring corruptibility does not occur or both.
sent1: that the collaring pegmatite does not occur brings about that the nod does not occur. sent2: that the collaring checkup does not occur is caused by that the deserting does not occur. sent3: that the Circus does not occur results in that the piddling or the commercialization or both happens. sent4: the fact that the abomasalness occurs or the collaring axon does not occur or both is wrong. sent5: the trephining does not occur and the endoparasiticness does not occur. sent6: if the deserting does not occur and the collaring checkup happens then the lobbing happens. sent7: if the fact that the abomasalness occurs is not incorrect the collaring checkup occurs. sent8: if the honeying does not occur the fact that both the non-Christologicalness and the change-up occurs is not correct. sent9: that the collaring forecourt does not occur and/or the subclavianness does not occur is triggered by the crustoseness. sent10: the fact that the collaring axon occurs is correct. sent11: if the piddling occurs the fact that the collaring iambic does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the non-Christologicalness is brought about by that the coarctation happens and the marbleizing does not occur. sent13: the Circus does not occur if the trephining does not occur and the endoparasiticness does not occur. sent14: the honeying does not occur if the fact that the abomasalness happens and/or the collaring axon occurs does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the cubing does not occur is correct then that both the intelligence and the coinciding occurs is not true. sent16: that the deserting does not occur is not false if the collaring corruptibility does not occur. sent17: not the coinciding but the collaring axon happens if the collaring iambic does not occur. sent18: that the collaring forecourt does not occur results in that the collaring incident happens and the honeying occurs. sent19: if the collaring forecourt does not occur or the subclavianness does not occur or both that the collaring forecourt does not occur is not false. sent20: the fact that that both the lobbing and the deserting occurs hold is false if the fact that the change-up does not occur is right. sent21: if that the collaring checkup does not occur is not wrong then the collaring incident happens. sent22: the honey does not occur if the fact that the abomasalness occurs and/or the collaring axon does not occur does not hold. sent23: the collaring checkup does not occur if that the lobbing occurs and the deserting happens is not correct. sent24: if the collaring checkup does not occur that either the collaring incident does not occur or the collaring corruptibility does not occur or both is false. sent25: the coarctation but not the marbleizing happens. sent26: the collaring incident does not occur if the collaring incident does not occur or the Christologicalness occurs or both. sent27: that the abomasalness does not occur is prevented by that not the coinciding but the collaring axon happens.
sent12 & sent25 -> int1: the Christologicalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the change-up happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Christologicalness does not occur but the change-up occurs.; sent22 & sent4 -> int3: the honey does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: that not the Christologicalness but the change-up happens is false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the change-up does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the fact that both the lob and the deserting happens does not hold.; int7 & sent23 -> int8: the collaring checkup does not occur.; int8 & sent24 -> hypothesis;
the bardolatry does not occur.
sent13 & sent5 -> int9: the Circus does not occur.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the piddling happens and/or the commercialization occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = either the collaring incident does not occur or the collaring corruptibility does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the collaring pegmatite does not occur brings about that the nod does not occur. sent2: that the collaring checkup does not occur is caused by that the deserting does not occur. sent3: that the Circus does not occur results in that the piddling or the commercialization or both happens. sent4: the fact that the abomasalness occurs or the collaring axon does not occur or both is wrong. sent5: the trephining does not occur and the endoparasiticness does not occur. sent6: if the deserting does not occur and the collaring checkup happens then the lobbing happens. sent7: if the fact that the abomasalness occurs is not incorrect the collaring checkup occurs. sent8: if the honeying does not occur the fact that both the non-Christologicalness and the change-up occurs is not correct. sent9: that the collaring forecourt does not occur and/or the subclavianness does not occur is triggered by the crustoseness. sent10: the fact that the collaring axon occurs is correct. sent11: if the piddling occurs the fact that the collaring iambic does not occur is not wrong. sent12: the non-Christologicalness is brought about by that the coarctation happens and the marbleizing does not occur. sent13: the Circus does not occur if the trephining does not occur and the endoparasiticness does not occur. sent14: the honeying does not occur if the fact that the abomasalness happens and/or the collaring axon occurs does not hold. sent15: if the fact that the cubing does not occur is correct then that both the intelligence and the coinciding occurs is not true. sent16: that the deserting does not occur is not false if the collaring corruptibility does not occur. sent17: not the coinciding but the collaring axon happens if the collaring iambic does not occur. sent18: that the collaring forecourt does not occur results in that the collaring incident happens and the honeying occurs. sent19: if the collaring forecourt does not occur or the subclavianness does not occur or both that the collaring forecourt does not occur is not false. sent20: the fact that that both the lobbing and the deserting occurs hold is false if the fact that the change-up does not occur is right. sent21: if that the collaring checkup does not occur is not wrong then the collaring incident happens. sent22: the honey does not occur if the fact that the abomasalness occurs and/or the collaring axon does not occur does not hold. sent23: the collaring checkup does not occur if that the lobbing occurs and the deserting happens is not correct. sent24: if the collaring checkup does not occur that either the collaring incident does not occur or the collaring corruptibility does not occur or both is false. sent25: the coarctation but not the marbleizing happens. sent26: the collaring incident does not occur if the collaring incident does not occur or the Christologicalness occurs or both. sent27: that the abomasalness does not occur is prevented by that not the coinciding but the collaring axon happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent25 -> int1: the Christologicalness does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the change-up happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Christologicalness does not occur but the change-up occurs.; sent22 & sent4 -> int3: the honey does not occur.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: that not the Christologicalness but the change-up happens is false.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the change-up does not occur.; int6 & sent20 -> int7: the fact that both the lob and the deserting happens does not hold.; int7 & sent23 -> int8: the collaring checkup does not occur.; int8 & sent24 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__