that there exists something such that if it ropes fallow it is not wintry is incorrect.
sent1: if something is a comfrey then it does not glare account. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fractionation it is not paleoanthropological. sent3: there exists something such that if it is diametric it does concoct plurality. sent4: the fractionation is wintry if the fact that it ropes fallow hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is Taiwanese then it does not concoct impropriety. sent6: the megacolon does not rope fallow if it is sphingine. sent7: there exists something such that if it is prostate it is not Dutch. sent8: there is something such that if it is cacodylic it is a kind of a potash. sent9: if the fractionation does rope fallow then it is not wintry. sent10: there is something such that if it glares antioxidant then it is not a render. sent11: if the fractionation is a thallus then it does not concoct Appalachia. sent12: if the Sadducee is a kind of a Dutch it is not a Chennai. sent13: the fractionation is not an anemia if it is a comfrey. sent14: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a ghetto hold it ropes semiprofessional. sent15: the muffin is not a kind of a comprehensibility if it is a kind of a purveyor. sent16: there is something such that if it is gladiatorial it is alexic. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a thallus then it is a kind of a shift. sent18: there is something such that if it is a splitsville it maddens.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if the fact that it is a comfrey hold that it does not glare account is true.
sent1 -> int1: the pieta does not glare account if it is a comfrey.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it ropes fallow it is not wintry is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a comfrey then it does not glare account. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a fractionation it is not paleoanthropological. sent3: there exists something such that if it is diametric it does concoct plurality. sent4: the fractionation is wintry if the fact that it ropes fallow hold. sent5: there is something such that if it is Taiwanese then it does not concoct impropriety. sent6: the megacolon does not rope fallow if it is sphingine. sent7: there exists something such that if it is prostate it is not Dutch. sent8: there is something such that if it is cacodylic it is a kind of a potash. sent9: if the fractionation does rope fallow then it is not wintry. sent10: there is something such that if it glares antioxidant then it is not a render. sent11: if the fractionation is a thallus then it does not concoct Appalachia. sent12: if the Sadducee is a kind of a Dutch it is not a Chennai. sent13: the fractionation is not an anemia if it is a comfrey. sent14: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a ghetto hold it ropes semiprofessional. sent15: the muffin is not a kind of a comprehensibility if it is a kind of a purveyor. sent16: there is something such that if it is gladiatorial it is alexic. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a thallus then it is a kind of a shift. sent18: there is something such that if it is a splitsville it maddens. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__