that the collider does transship pudge is not incorrect if the broadcaster does conscript infrastructure.
sent1: the Jersey is a handcar but it does not transship pudge. sent2: the baptistry is a Gulliver if that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and is not a kind of a lung-power does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the broadcaster is a lung-power is correct the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver. sent4: if that the broadcaster does conscript infrastructure but it is not a lung-power is false then the baptistry is a Gulliver. sent5: if the broadcaster is a lung-power then the collider is both a Gulliver and not a lung-power. sent6: the fact that the collider is not a Gulliver is true. sent7: if the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver the collider is not a kind of a Gulliver. sent8: the broadcaster is not a kind of a lung-power. sent9: the fact that the baptistry is not a Gulliver and it does not transship pudge does not hold. sent10: that that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure but it is a kind of a lung-power does not hold is true. sent11: the broadcaster transships pudge. sent12: if something does not conscript infrastructure it is a kind of distal thing that does not transship pudge. sent13: the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver if the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and is not a lung-power. sent14: the sedge transships pudge. sent15: if the baptistry is a Gulliver then that the collider transships pudge but it is not a kind of a Gulliver is correct. sent16: that the baptistry does not transship pudge and is not a Gulliver does not hold. sent17: the broadcaster conscripts infrastructure and is not a kind of a lung-power. sent18: the fact that the broadcaster does not transship pudge and does not conscript infrastructure is false. sent19: if the broadcaster is a Gulliver the baptistry conscripts infrastructure and is not a kind of a Gulliver.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadcaster conscripts infrastructure.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and it is not a kind of a lung-power.; assump2 -> int1: the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and is not a lung-power is wrong.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the collider transships pudge and is not a Gulliver.; int5 -> int6: the collider does transship pudge.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the leopardess is distal and does not transship pudge.
sent12 -> int7: if the leopardess does not conscript infrastructure it is distal and does not transship pudge.;
$hypothesis$ = that the collider does transship pudge is not incorrect if the broadcaster does conscript infrastructure. ; $context$ = sent1: the Jersey is a handcar but it does not transship pudge. sent2: the baptistry is a Gulliver if that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and is not a kind of a lung-power does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the broadcaster is a lung-power is correct the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver. sent4: if that the broadcaster does conscript infrastructure but it is not a lung-power is false then the baptistry is a Gulliver. sent5: if the broadcaster is a lung-power then the collider is both a Gulliver and not a lung-power. sent6: the fact that the collider is not a Gulliver is true. sent7: if the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver the collider is not a kind of a Gulliver. sent8: the broadcaster is not a kind of a lung-power. sent9: the fact that the baptistry is not a Gulliver and it does not transship pudge does not hold. sent10: that that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure but it is a kind of a lung-power does not hold is true. sent11: the broadcaster transships pudge. sent12: if something does not conscript infrastructure it is a kind of distal thing that does not transship pudge. sent13: the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver if the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and is not a lung-power. sent14: the sedge transships pudge. sent15: if the baptistry is a Gulliver then that the collider transships pudge but it is not a kind of a Gulliver is correct. sent16: that the baptistry does not transship pudge and is not a Gulliver does not hold. sent17: the broadcaster conscripts infrastructure and is not a kind of a lung-power. sent18: the fact that the broadcaster does not transship pudge and does not conscript infrastructure is false. sent19: if the broadcaster is a Gulliver the baptistry conscripts infrastructure and is not a kind of a Gulliver. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadcaster conscripts infrastructure.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and it is not a kind of a lung-power.; assump2 -> int1: the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the broadcaster does not conscript infrastructure and is not a lung-power is wrong.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the baptistry is a kind of a Gulliver.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the collider transships pudge and is not a Gulliver.; int5 -> int6: the collider does transship pudge.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__