the serictery is not a kind of a ludo.
sent1: if that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker and is not a canine does not hold the serictery is not a ludo. sent2: the eyewitness does not wrest Myocastor. sent3: the portcullis is a kind of a demographic. sent4: the gallinule is not peritoneal if the dentine does guggle and it is a kind of a demographic. sent5: the dentine is non-demographic if the eyewitness is a canine and it does achromatize Kronecker. sent6: the swatch does guggle and it is nautical. sent7: the pooler is a kind of a canine. sent8: something is peritoneal if it wrests Myocastor. sent9: if the eyewitness is not a kind of a canine then the fact that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker and it is not a kind of a canine does not hold. sent10: the fact that the dentine is passionless and it is a demographic is true. sent11: The Myocastor does wrest gallinule. sent12: if the gallinule is peritoneal but it does not achromatize Kronecker then the dentine is not a demographic. sent13: the serictery does prime depression. sent14: the dentine guggles if the eyewitness is canine. sent15: something is a ludo if the fact that it is not canine is not right. sent16: that the swatch achromatizes Kronecker but it is not a kind of a canine is not correct. sent17: the gallinule is peritoneal and does not achromatize Kronecker if the swatch is passionless. sent18: if the dentine is not a kind of a demographic the eyewitness is not demographic. sent19: the fact that the serictery is not a ludo and does not achromatize Kronecker is not true if that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker is not false. sent20: the serictery does guggle and it is a canine if the eyewitness is not a demographic. sent21: the gallinule does wrest Myocastor.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eyewitness is a kind of a canine.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the dentine does guggle.; sent10 -> int2: the dentine is a demographic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dentine does guggle and it is demographic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the gallinule is not peritoneal is correct.; sent8 -> int5: if the gallinule wrests Myocastor that it is peritoneal is not incorrect.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the gallinule is peritoneal.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the eyewitness is non-canine.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker and is not a canine does not hold.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
that the serictery is a ludo hold.
sent15 -> int10: if the serictery is a canine then it is a ludo.;
$hypothesis$ = the serictery is not a kind of a ludo. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker and is not a canine does not hold the serictery is not a ludo. sent2: the eyewitness does not wrest Myocastor. sent3: the portcullis is a kind of a demographic. sent4: the gallinule is not peritoneal if the dentine does guggle and it is a kind of a demographic. sent5: the dentine is non-demographic if the eyewitness is a canine and it does achromatize Kronecker. sent6: the swatch does guggle and it is nautical. sent7: the pooler is a kind of a canine. sent8: something is peritoneal if it wrests Myocastor. sent9: if the eyewitness is not a kind of a canine then the fact that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker and it is not a kind of a canine does not hold. sent10: the fact that the dentine is passionless and it is a demographic is true. sent11: The Myocastor does wrest gallinule. sent12: if the gallinule is peritoneal but it does not achromatize Kronecker then the dentine is not a demographic. sent13: the serictery does prime depression. sent14: the dentine guggles if the eyewitness is canine. sent15: something is a ludo if the fact that it is not canine is not right. sent16: that the swatch achromatizes Kronecker but it is not a kind of a canine is not correct. sent17: the gallinule is peritoneal and does not achromatize Kronecker if the swatch is passionless. sent18: if the dentine is not a kind of a demographic the eyewitness is not demographic. sent19: the fact that the serictery is not a ludo and does not achromatize Kronecker is not true if that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker is not false. sent20: the serictery does guggle and it is a canine if the eyewitness is not a demographic. sent21: the gallinule does wrest Myocastor. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eyewitness is a kind of a canine.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the dentine does guggle.; sent10 -> int2: the dentine is a demographic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dentine does guggle and it is demographic.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the gallinule is not peritoneal is correct.; sent8 -> int5: if the gallinule wrests Myocastor that it is peritoneal is not incorrect.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the gallinule is peritoneal.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the eyewitness is non-canine.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: that the swatch does not achromatize Kronecker and is not a canine does not hold.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__