that if the gutter is a Tobagonian then that the sawmill undresses flypaper and is not litigious is not right is not correct.
sent1: the gutter is cutting if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a dish that does not liquidize does not hold. sent2: the gutter does not undress flypaper if it is cutting thing that is a kind of a Tobagonian. sent3: if something is an andante the fact that it dishes and it does not liquidize is incorrect. sent4: the hookworm is an andante. sent5: that the hookworm dishes and it does liquidize is false if it is a kind of an andante. sent6: the hookworm is a Tobagonian. sent7: the fact that something is a dish and it liquidizes is false if it is an andante. sent8: the foxhound is pelvic if there is something such that that it is not pelvic and it does not cut does not hold. sent9: the fact that the sawmill undresses flypaper and it is litigious is incorrect. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a dish that does not liquidize is wrong the hookworm cuts. sent11: the fact that the sawmill does undress flypaper and is not litigious is wrong if the gutter does not undress flypaper. sent12: that the gutter is Tobagonian and it does cut is wrong if it does liquidize. sent13: if the sawmill is litigious and is a kind of a dish then it does not undress flypaper.
sent3 -> int1: if the hookworm is an andante then the fact that it is a dish and does not liquidize is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the hookworm does dish but it does not liquidize is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does dish and does not liquidize is incorrect.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the gutter does cut.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gutter is a kind of a Tobagonian.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the gutter is a cutting and it is a Tobagonian.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the gutter does not undress flypaper.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: that the sawmill does undress flypaper but it is non-litigious is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the foxhound does bop statin and it is pelvic.
$hypothesis$ = that if the gutter is a Tobagonian then that the sawmill undresses flypaper and is not litigious is not right is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the gutter is cutting if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a dish that does not liquidize does not hold. sent2: the gutter does not undress flypaper if it is cutting thing that is a kind of a Tobagonian. sent3: if something is an andante the fact that it dishes and it does not liquidize is incorrect. sent4: the hookworm is an andante. sent5: that the hookworm dishes and it does liquidize is false if it is a kind of an andante. sent6: the hookworm is a Tobagonian. sent7: the fact that something is a dish and it liquidizes is false if it is an andante. sent8: the foxhound is pelvic if there is something such that that it is not pelvic and it does not cut does not hold. sent9: the fact that the sawmill undresses flypaper and it is litigious is incorrect. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a dish that does not liquidize is wrong the hookworm cuts. sent11: the fact that the sawmill does undress flypaper and is not litigious is wrong if the gutter does not undress flypaper. sent12: that the gutter is Tobagonian and it does cut is wrong if it does liquidize. sent13: if the sawmill is litigious and is a kind of a dish then it does not undress flypaper. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the hookworm is an andante then the fact that it is a dish and does not liquidize is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fact that the hookworm does dish but it does not liquidize is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it does dish and does not liquidize is incorrect.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the gutter does cut.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gutter is a kind of a Tobagonian.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the gutter is a cutting and it is a Tobagonian.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the gutter does not undress flypaper.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: that the sawmill does undress flypaper but it is non-litigious is false.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__