the finnan is Argentine and it alludes.
sent1: if something does not outstare adjudicator then the fact that it does not outstare Ethiopian and/or it does shatter is not right. sent2: the finnan is allometric. sent3: the shadflower is allometric. sent4: the finnan does smother. sent5: the finnan is allometric and it is Argentine. sent6: if something is non-allometric then that it is Argentine and does allude is incorrect. sent7: the finnan is not non-Fijian. sent8: if the finnan shatters it alludes. sent9: if something is a kind of a venue that it is not scholarly or it does not outstare adjudicator or both is not right. sent10: the finnan is a divvy if it is relativistic. sent11: if that the huck is not scholarly and/or it does not outstare adjudicator is not true the fagot does not outstare adjudicator. sent12: the huck is a venue if that the Ethiopian is a ornamentalism is not incorrect. sent13: the finnan shatters.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the finnan is Argentine is not false.; sent8 & sent13 -> int2: the finnan alludes.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the finnan is Argentine and it does allude does not hold.
sent6 -> int3: that the finnan is Argentine and it alludes is not correct if it is not allometric.; sent1 -> int4: the fact that the fagot does not outstare Ethiopian and/or it shatters is not right if it does not outstare adjudicator.; sent9 -> int5: if the huck is a kind of a venue that it is not scholarly and/or it does not outstare adjudicator is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the finnan is Argentine and it alludes. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not outstare adjudicator then the fact that it does not outstare Ethiopian and/or it does shatter is not right. sent2: the finnan is allometric. sent3: the shadflower is allometric. sent4: the finnan does smother. sent5: the finnan is allometric and it is Argentine. sent6: if something is non-allometric then that it is Argentine and does allude is incorrect. sent7: the finnan is not non-Fijian. sent8: if the finnan shatters it alludes. sent9: if something is a kind of a venue that it is not scholarly or it does not outstare adjudicator or both is not right. sent10: the finnan is a divvy if it is relativistic. sent11: if that the huck is not scholarly and/or it does not outstare adjudicator is not true the fagot does not outstare adjudicator. sent12: the huck is a venue if that the Ethiopian is a ornamentalism is not incorrect. sent13: the finnan shatters. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the finnan is Argentine is not false.; sent8 & sent13 -> int2: the finnan alludes.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__