if the territorialization happens the indemnification does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the doctoring does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the non-Pacificness and the biopiracy happens if the photochemicalness does not occur. sent3: that the Pacificness does not occur is true if that the photochemicalness does not occur is not wrong. sent4: the maxiness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the squinch occurs hold the indemnification does not occur. sent6: the benison happens. sent7: if the squinch and/or the biopiracy happens the indemnification happens. sent8: the Pacificness does not occur. sent9: that the territorialization does not occur is caused by that the benison occurs and the photochemicalness happens. sent10: the indemnification happens if the territorialization happens. sent11: that the buteonine does not occur is caused by the devoicing abstractionist. sent12: that the molding evangelist occurs is correct. sent13: that the indemnification occurs is true.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the territorialization happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photochemicalness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the benison and the photochemicalness occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the territorialization does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the photochemicalness does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the non-Pacificness and the biopiracy happens.; int5 -> int6: the biopiracy occurs.; int6 -> int7: either the squinch or the biopiracy or both occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = if the territorialization happens the indemnification does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the doctoring does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the non-Pacificness and the biopiracy happens if the photochemicalness does not occur. sent3: that the Pacificness does not occur is true if that the photochemicalness does not occur is not wrong. sent4: the maxiness occurs. sent5: if the fact that the squinch occurs hold the indemnification does not occur. sent6: the benison happens. sent7: if the squinch and/or the biopiracy happens the indemnification happens. sent8: the Pacificness does not occur. sent9: that the territorialization does not occur is caused by that the benison occurs and the photochemicalness happens. sent10: the indemnification happens if the territorialization happens. sent11: that the buteonine does not occur is caused by the devoicing abstractionist. sent12: that the molding evangelist occurs is correct. sent13: that the indemnification occurs is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the territorialization happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the photochemicalness happens.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the benison and the photochemicalness occurs.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the territorialization does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the photochemicalness does not occur.; sent2 & int4 -> int5: the non-Pacificness and the biopiracy happens.; int5 -> int6: the biopiracy occurs.; int6 -> int7: either the squinch or the biopiracy or both occurs.; __UNKNOWN__