the fact that not the preventing but the topness occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the congenialness occurs that the preventing does not occur but the top happens does not hold. sent2: if the non-likableness and the BW occurs the preventing does not occur. sent3: the calculousness is prevented by the handicraft and/or that the congenialness occurs. sent4: the handicraft occurs if the fact that both the non-likableness and the BW happens is not true. sent5: the metalworking does not occur. sent6: the strabotomy occurs and the staggering spirogram happens. sent7: that the calculousness occurs and the batching recrudescence does not occur is brought about by that the metalworking does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the calculousness but not the handicraft happens does not hold then the congenialness occurs. sent9: the strabotomy occurs but the batching recrudescence does not occur if the staggering spirogram does not occur. sent10: if that the strabotomy does not occur does not hold then the top happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the likableness does not occur and the BW occurs is false.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the handicraft occurs.; int1 -> int2: the handicraft occurs and/or the congenialness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the calculousness does not occur.; sent7 & sent5 -> int4: the calculousness but not the batching recrudescence occurs.; int4 -> int5: the calculousness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: both the non-likableness and the BW occurs.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the preventing does not occur.; sent6 -> int9: the fact that the strabotomy does not occur is wrong.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the topping happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the preventing does not occur but the topping occurs is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the preventing but the topness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the congenialness occurs that the preventing does not occur but the top happens does not hold. sent2: if the non-likableness and the BW occurs the preventing does not occur. sent3: the calculousness is prevented by the handicraft and/or that the congenialness occurs. sent4: the handicraft occurs if the fact that both the non-likableness and the BW happens is not true. sent5: the metalworking does not occur. sent6: the strabotomy occurs and the staggering spirogram happens. sent7: that the calculousness occurs and the batching recrudescence does not occur is brought about by that the metalworking does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the calculousness but not the handicraft happens does not hold then the congenialness occurs. sent9: the strabotomy occurs but the batching recrudescence does not occur if the staggering spirogram does not occur. sent10: if that the strabotomy does not occur does not hold then the top happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the likableness does not occur and the BW occurs is false.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the handicraft occurs.; int1 -> int2: the handicraft occurs and/or the congenialness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the calculousness does not occur.; sent7 & sent5 -> int4: the calculousness but not the batching recrudescence occurs.; int4 -> int5: the calculousness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: both the non-likableness and the BW occurs.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the preventing does not occur.; sent6 -> int9: the fact that the strabotomy does not occur is wrong.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the topping happens.; int8 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__