the fact that there is something such that if it is a Albigensianism then that it is actual and it does not criticize latchkey is not right hold.
sent1: if something is a Albigensianism then the fact that it is actual and criticizes latchkey is not right. sent2: the cot is actual and does not criticize latchkey if it is a Albigensianism. sent3: that the eolith is a kind of actual thing that is non-testaceous is incorrect if it is anserine. sent4: if the cot is a Albigensianism then that it is a kind of actual thing that criticizes latchkey does not hold. sent5: if something is a Albigensianism then it is actual and does not criticize latchkey. sent6: if something is a kind of a Albigensianism then the fact that it is a subordination and it is not a kind of a Daba is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Albigensianism then the fact that it is actual and it criticizes latchkey is false. sent8: if something is clausal the fact that it does signalize and does not heap roisterer does not hold. sent9: that the cot is a Albigensianism and it is unpeaceful is not true if the fact that it does heap FHA is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Albigensianism it is actual and it does not criticize latchkey.
the fact that the cot is a subordination but it is not a Daba is wrong if the fact that it is a kind of a Albigensianism hold.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a Albigensianism then that it is actual and it does not criticize latchkey is not right hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a Albigensianism then the fact that it is actual and criticizes latchkey is not right. sent2: the cot is actual and does not criticize latchkey if it is a Albigensianism. sent3: that the eolith is a kind of actual thing that is non-testaceous is incorrect if it is anserine. sent4: if the cot is a Albigensianism then that it is a kind of actual thing that criticizes latchkey does not hold. sent5: if something is a Albigensianism then it is actual and does not criticize latchkey. sent6: if something is a kind of a Albigensianism then the fact that it is a subordination and it is not a kind of a Daba is not right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Albigensianism then the fact that it is actual and it criticizes latchkey is false. sent8: if something is clausal the fact that it does signalize and does not heap roisterer does not hold. sent9: that the cot is a Albigensianism and it is unpeaceful is not true if the fact that it does heap FHA is not wrong. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a Albigensianism it is actual and it does not criticize latchkey. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__