that the tumbrel is a stout and is not potent is not false.
sent1: if that the herbalist is not opportune or it is not a kind of a drawbar or both is not right then the plier is a sild. sent2: if the fact that something drains whittler but it is not potent is not right then it is not a sild. sent3: the rack is not weightless if the fact that the herbalist is both a stout and not weightless is wrong. sent4: if the herbalist is not weightless it is a drawbar. sent5: the herbalist is Rhodesian. sent6: something is both a stout and not potent if it is weightless. sent7: the fact that the atmometer is a drawbar is true. sent8: that the tumbrel is a stout and it is potent is not correct if the plier is a sild. sent9: the plier is a sild if the fact that the herbalist is not opportune and/or is a kind of a drawbar does not hold. sent10: the plier is not successful. sent11: something that is Rhodesian or is not a sild or both is not a sild. sent12: if something is not a sild the fact that it is a stout and it is not weightless is not correct. sent13: if that the herbalist is potent and/or it is not a drawbar does not hold then the tumbrel is weightless. sent14: the fact that the herbalist is not opportune or it is not a drawbar or both is not true if it is not weightless. sent15: if the fact that something is non-weightless thing that does not drain whittler is not right it is weightless. sent16: that the tumbrel is a kind of a stout that is potent is not true. sent17: if the plier is not biotitic then it is opportune. sent18: the herbalist is not weightless. sent19: if that the plier is a sild hold then the fact that the fact that the tumbrel is a stout and not potent is not true is true. sent20: the fact that the herbalist is a kind of a stout and it is a drawbar is not right. sent21: that if the fact that the plier is not successful is true that the plier is not neuropsychological and does not drain permission does not hold hold. sent22: the tumbrel does not drain whittler if the herbalist is both Rhodesian and incommutable. sent23: something is Rhodesian or is not a sild or both if it is incommutable.
sent14 & sent18 -> int1: that the herbalist is not opportune or not a drawbar or both is not true.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the plier is a sild.; sent19 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the tumbrel is a stout and is not potent.
$hypothesis$ = that the tumbrel is a stout and is not potent is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the herbalist is not opportune or it is not a kind of a drawbar or both is not right then the plier is a sild. sent2: if the fact that something drains whittler but it is not potent is not right then it is not a sild. sent3: the rack is not weightless if the fact that the herbalist is both a stout and not weightless is wrong. sent4: if the herbalist is not weightless it is a drawbar. sent5: the herbalist is Rhodesian. sent6: something is both a stout and not potent if it is weightless. sent7: the fact that the atmometer is a drawbar is true. sent8: that the tumbrel is a stout and it is potent is not correct if the plier is a sild. sent9: the plier is a sild if the fact that the herbalist is not opportune and/or is a kind of a drawbar does not hold. sent10: the plier is not successful. sent11: something that is Rhodesian or is not a sild or both is not a sild. sent12: if something is not a sild the fact that it is a stout and it is not weightless is not correct. sent13: if that the herbalist is potent and/or it is not a drawbar does not hold then the tumbrel is weightless. sent14: the fact that the herbalist is not opportune or it is not a drawbar or both is not true if it is not weightless. sent15: if the fact that something is non-weightless thing that does not drain whittler is not right it is weightless. sent16: that the tumbrel is a kind of a stout that is potent is not true. sent17: if the plier is not biotitic then it is opportune. sent18: the herbalist is not weightless. sent19: if that the plier is a sild hold then the fact that the fact that the tumbrel is a stout and not potent is not true is true. sent20: the fact that the herbalist is a kind of a stout and it is a drawbar is not right. sent21: that if the fact that the plier is not successful is true that the plier is not neuropsychological and does not drain permission does not hold hold. sent22: the tumbrel does not drain whittler if the herbalist is both Rhodesian and incommutable. sent23: something is Rhodesian or is not a sild or both if it is incommutable. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent18 -> int1: that the herbalist is not opportune or not a drawbar or both is not true.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the plier is a sild.; sent19 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__