that the surge does not occur and/or that the comber does not occur is caused by that the skit occurs.
sent1: the eluting popularity happens and the looming cowrie occurs. sent2: that the surging does not occur is not false if both the cytoplasmicness and the skit happens. sent3: that the surge does not occur or the comber or both is triggered by the skit. sent4: the surge does not occur and/or the comber happens. sent5: the fact that the cytoplasmicness happens is not wrong if the fact that not the seraphicness but the looming novelette occurs is not correct. sent6: the fact that the non-seraphicness and the looming novelette occurs does not hold. sent7: either the nonprofit or the non-Sarawakianness or both happens. sent8: the non-feministness and/or the non-mineralness happens if that the card occurs is true. sent9: the surging and/or that the comber does not occur is brought about by that the skit occurs.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the cytoplasmicness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skit occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cytoplasmicness happens and the skit occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the surge does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the surging does not occur and/or the comber does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the surge does not occur and/or that the comber does not occur is caused by that the skit occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the eluting popularity happens and the looming cowrie occurs. sent2: that the surging does not occur is not false if both the cytoplasmicness and the skit happens. sent3: that the surge does not occur or the comber or both is triggered by the skit. sent4: the surge does not occur and/or the comber happens. sent5: the fact that the cytoplasmicness happens is not wrong if the fact that not the seraphicness but the looming novelette occurs is not correct. sent6: the fact that the non-seraphicness and the looming novelette occurs does not hold. sent7: either the nonprofit or the non-Sarawakianness or both happens. sent8: the non-feministness and/or the non-mineralness happens if that the card occurs is true. sent9: the surging and/or that the comber does not occur is brought about by that the skit occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the cytoplasmicness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the skit occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cytoplasmicness happens and the skit occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the surge does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the surging does not occur and/or the comber does not occur.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__