that if the sapote is a kind of a combustible the fact that the sprawler does adhere buttery is right is not correct.
sent1: something that is a Gregory adheres buttery. sent2: the buttery is a combustible if it strives. sent3: the sprawler is czarist if that it is a Gregory hold. sent4: the sapote is falconine if it is a kind of a combustible. sent5: if something is incorrigible it is a kind of a Gregory. sent6: there is something such that it is czarist. sent7: the sapote is czarist. sent8: the sprawler is combustible. sent9: there exists something such that it is a combustible. sent10: if the sapote is czarist then it adheres buttery. sent11: if there is something such that it is czarist or combustible or both the sprawler is not corrigible.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sapote is a combustible.; assump1 -> int1: either the sapote is czarist or it is a combustible or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is czarist or it is combustible or both.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the sprawler is incorrigible.; sent5 -> int4: if the sprawler is incorrigible it is a Gregory.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the sprawler is a Gregory is not wrong.; sent1 -> int6: if the sprawler is a Gregory it does adhere buttery.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sprawler does adhere buttery.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the sapote is a kind of a combustible the fact that the sprawler does adhere buttery is right is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something that is a Gregory adheres buttery. sent2: the buttery is a combustible if it strives. sent3: the sprawler is czarist if that it is a Gregory hold. sent4: the sapote is falconine if it is a kind of a combustible. sent5: if something is incorrigible it is a kind of a Gregory. sent6: there is something such that it is czarist. sent7: the sapote is czarist. sent8: the sprawler is combustible. sent9: there exists something such that it is a combustible. sent10: if the sapote is czarist then it adheres buttery. sent11: if there is something such that it is czarist or combustible or both the sprawler is not corrigible. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sapote is a combustible.; assump1 -> int1: either the sapote is czarist or it is a combustible or both.; int1 -> int2: either something is czarist or it is combustible or both.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the sprawler is incorrigible.; sent5 -> int4: if the sprawler is incorrigible it is a Gregory.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the sprawler is a Gregory is not wrong.; sent1 -> int6: if the sprawler is a Gregory it does adhere buttery.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sprawler does adhere buttery.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__