the diagnostician is a Valerianaceae.
sent1: the diagnostician is a Valerianaceae if that the pesticide is a kind of a Valerianaceae is true. sent2: if something that is Democratic sounds Montez the diagnostician is not lethargic. sent3: the Congo is a kind of Democratic thing that does sound Montez. sent4: everything does not post. sent5: there is something such that it does not muff gruffness. sent6: the fact that the diagnostician is not a Valerianaceae is not false if something that is not provencal does not muff gruffness. sent7: there is something such that it is not provencal and does not muff gruffness. sent8: the hepadnavirus does not sound Montez if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Tallapoosa that does not post. sent9: if something does not sound Montez then it either is not Democratic or does not sound hepadnavirus or both. sent10: the fact that the diagnostician is not tights is true if the pesticide does not sound hepadnavirus but it is a Valerianaceae. sent11: the fact that something that does not destain interrupter is both a Tallapoosa and not a posted is true. sent12: that the Congo does destain interrupter and it is not non-mithraic is not right. sent13: the diagnostician is not provencal. sent14: if the fact that something does destain interrupter and it is mithraic does not hold then it does not destain interrupter.
sent7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the diagnostician is not a Valerianaceae does not hold.
sent9 -> int1: the hepadnavirus is not Democratic and/or does not sound hepadnavirus if it does not sound Montez.; sent11 -> int2: if the Congo does not destain interrupter it is a Tallapoosa and it is not a posted.; sent14 -> int3: the Congo does not destain interrupter if the fact that it destain interrupter and is mithraic is not true.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the Congo does not destain interrupter is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the Congo is a Tallapoosa but it does not post.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a kind of a Tallapoosa that does not post.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the hepadnavirus does not sound Montez.; int1 & int7 -> int8: the hepadnavirus is non-Democratic or it does not sound hepadnavirus or both.; int8 -> int9: something either is not Democratic or does not sound hepadnavirus or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the diagnostician is a Valerianaceae. ; $context$ = sent1: the diagnostician is a Valerianaceae if that the pesticide is a kind of a Valerianaceae is true. sent2: if something that is Democratic sounds Montez the diagnostician is not lethargic. sent3: the Congo is a kind of Democratic thing that does sound Montez. sent4: everything does not post. sent5: there is something such that it does not muff gruffness. sent6: the fact that the diagnostician is not a Valerianaceae is not false if something that is not provencal does not muff gruffness. sent7: there is something such that it is not provencal and does not muff gruffness. sent8: the hepadnavirus does not sound Montez if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Tallapoosa that does not post. sent9: if something does not sound Montez then it either is not Democratic or does not sound hepadnavirus or both. sent10: the fact that the diagnostician is not tights is true if the pesticide does not sound hepadnavirus but it is a Valerianaceae. sent11: the fact that something that does not destain interrupter is both a Tallapoosa and not a posted is true. sent12: that the Congo does destain interrupter and it is not non-mithraic is not right. sent13: the diagnostician is not provencal. sent14: if the fact that something does destain interrupter and it is mithraic does not hold then it does not destain interrupter. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__