there is something such that if it damages seedtime then that it is not psychosexual and does claret does not hold.
sent1: the calculator does not damage bouffant and does damage Superfund if it is a claret. sent2: if the calculator does bethink calculator the fact that it bethinks riddle and it is a claret is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is a pigmentation is true then the fact that it does not discount and it is unclean is not right. sent4: the calculator is a kind of non-agronomic thing that is psychosexual if it is Athenian. sent5: that something is not a stoop but Pharaonic is wrong if it escalates. sent6: the fact that something is not precocious but it does hydroplane is not true if it does boggle. sent7: if the calculator is a kind of a tequila then it does not damage seedtime and does damage foxhunt. sent8: there is something such that if it does bethink riddle the fact that it does damage glycol and is agronomic does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it damages seedtime then that it is not psychosexual and does claret does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the calculator does not damage bouffant and does damage Superfund if it is a claret. sent2: if the calculator does bethink calculator the fact that it bethinks riddle and it is a claret is incorrect. sent3: if the fact that something is a pigmentation is true then the fact that it does not discount and it is unclean is not right. sent4: the calculator is a kind of non-agronomic thing that is psychosexual if it is Athenian. sent5: that something is not a stoop but Pharaonic is wrong if it escalates. sent6: the fact that something is not precocious but it does hydroplane is not true if it does boggle. sent7: if the calculator is a kind of a tequila then it does not damage seedtime and does damage foxhunt. sent8: there is something such that if it does bethink riddle the fact that it does damage glycol and is agronomic does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__