the expurgator does not perplex rhodochrosite.
sent1: if the son is a kind of a plastid and perplexes rhodochrosite then that the expurgator does not perplexes rhodochrosite is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it derails chiaroscuro is not wrong. sent3: if the mastaba is not aerobics the expurgator does not stigmatize Selene. sent4: the mastaba stigmatizes Selene if the troublemaker is approachable. sent5: the mastaba is not aerobics if the fact that the browallia is not a plastid and is a fermion is not false. sent6: something is a plastid if it is a plastid and/or it is not a kind of a fermion. sent7: the fact that the son is not a fit and/or it does not perplex microprocessor is wrong if it derails chiaroscuro. sent8: if the mastaba is not aerobics the expurgator is aerobics but it does not stigmatize Selene. sent9: the fact that the browallia is aerobics but it does not derail chiaroscuro does not hold if it is a kind of a furnace. sent10: the browallia is a kind of a fermion. sent11: if the son does derail chiaroscuro it perplexes microprocessor. sent12: the son is not a furnace. sent13: the son perplexes microprocessor. sent14: the toff is not a kind of a plastid. sent15: if the son is not a furnace either it is not a fit or it does not perplex microprocessor or both. sent16: the son perplexes rhodochrosite if that the browallia is aerobics but it does not derail chiaroscuro does not hold. sent17: if something that is aerobics does stigmatize Selene then it perplexes rhodochrosite. sent18: an aerobics thing that does not stigmatize Selene does perplex rhodochrosite. sent19: the son is a kind of a plastid and/or it is not a fermion if the mastaba stigmatizes Selene. sent20: the browallia is both not a plastid and a fermion if something does not derail chiaroscuro. sent21: the troublemaker is approachable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the son does derail chiaroscuro.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the son is not a kind of a fit and/or does not perplex microprocessor does not hold.; sent15 & sent12 -> int2: the son is not a fit and/or it does not perplex microprocessor.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the son does not derail chiaroscuro.; int4 -> int5: something does not derail chiaroscuro.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the browallia is not a plastid but a fermion.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the mastaba is not aerobics.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the expurgator is aerobics but it does not stigmatize Selene.; sent18 -> int9: that the expurgator does perplex rhodochrosite hold if it is aerobics and it does not stigmatize Selene.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the expurgator does not perplex rhodochrosite.
sent6 -> int10: if the son is a plastid and/or is not a fermion it is a plastid.; sent4 & sent21 -> int11: the mastaba does stigmatize Selene.; sent19 & int11 -> int12: the son is a plastid and/or not a fermion.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the son is a plastid.;
$hypothesis$ = the expurgator does not perplex rhodochrosite. ; $context$ = sent1: if the son is a kind of a plastid and perplexes rhodochrosite then that the expurgator does not perplexes rhodochrosite is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it derails chiaroscuro is not wrong. sent3: if the mastaba is not aerobics the expurgator does not stigmatize Selene. sent4: the mastaba stigmatizes Selene if the troublemaker is approachable. sent5: the mastaba is not aerobics if the fact that the browallia is not a plastid and is a fermion is not false. sent6: something is a plastid if it is a plastid and/or it is not a kind of a fermion. sent7: the fact that the son is not a fit and/or it does not perplex microprocessor is wrong if it derails chiaroscuro. sent8: if the mastaba is not aerobics the expurgator is aerobics but it does not stigmatize Selene. sent9: the fact that the browallia is aerobics but it does not derail chiaroscuro does not hold if it is a kind of a furnace. sent10: the browallia is a kind of a fermion. sent11: if the son does derail chiaroscuro it perplexes microprocessor. sent12: the son is not a furnace. sent13: the son perplexes microprocessor. sent14: the toff is not a kind of a plastid. sent15: if the son is not a furnace either it is not a fit or it does not perplex microprocessor or both. sent16: the son perplexes rhodochrosite if that the browallia is aerobics but it does not derail chiaroscuro does not hold. sent17: if something that is aerobics does stigmatize Selene then it perplexes rhodochrosite. sent18: an aerobics thing that does not stigmatize Selene does perplex rhodochrosite. sent19: the son is a kind of a plastid and/or it is not a fermion if the mastaba stigmatizes Selene. sent20: the browallia is both not a plastid and a fermion if something does not derail chiaroscuro. sent21: the troublemaker is approachable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the son does derail chiaroscuro.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: that the son is not a kind of a fit and/or does not perplex microprocessor does not hold.; sent15 & sent12 -> int2: the son is not a fit and/or it does not perplex microprocessor.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the son does not derail chiaroscuro.; int4 -> int5: something does not derail chiaroscuro.; int5 & sent20 -> int6: the browallia is not a plastid but a fermion.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the mastaba is not aerobics.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the expurgator is aerobics but it does not stigmatize Selene.; sent18 -> int9: that the expurgator does perplex rhodochrosite hold if it is aerobics and it does not stigmatize Selene.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__