the conveyance squishes miserliness and is a camper.
sent1: if something is cogitative it repots tympanoplasty. sent2: if the conveyance is a Mwera the fact that it does repot out-basket hold. sent3: that something does repot tympanoplasty or does not squish miserliness or both does not hold if it is not cogitative. sent4: the fact that something squishes miserliness and is a kind of a camper is false if it is not a braid. sent5: the fact that the conveyance is moneyless is correct. sent6: if the chokey braids then it does bulge. sent7: the monotheist does not repot tympanoplasty and is cogitative if it is moneyless. sent8: the sealskin is not a kind of a Potemkin if that it repots tympanoplasty and/or it does not squish miserliness is false. sent9: if something is a Potemkin and it is a braid then it does not repot tympanoplasty. sent10: the sealskin is not cogitative if it is moneyless and it is a generic. sent11: if the monotheist does not repot tympanoplasty the sealskin does not repot tympanoplasty. sent12: if the sealskin does not repot tympanoplasty the conveyance does braid and squishes miserliness. sent13: if something is crucial and it is a Miller then it is not a overachievement. sent14: that something is a birdfeeder and it does squish stump does not hold if it does not squish poisoning. sent15: the conveyance is a Potemkin. sent16: that the conveyance squishes karate and is a camper is not correct. sent17: the capuchin is not a camper if that the conveyance is not a camper is true. sent18: the conveyance smooths. sent19: the conveyance is cogitative if it is moneyless.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conveyance does braid.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the conveyance is a Potemkin and it is a braid.; sent9 -> int2: the fact that if the conveyance is the Potemkin that braids the fact that the conveyance does not repot tympanoplasty hold is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the conveyance does not repot tympanoplasty.; sent1 -> int4: if the conveyance is not non-cogitative then it repots tympanoplasty.; sent19 & sent5 -> int5: the conveyance is cogitative.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the conveyance repots tympanoplasty is not incorrect.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the conveyance is not a braid.; sent4 -> int9: the fact that the conveyance squishes miserliness and it is a kind of a camper is false if it is not a braid.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the conveyance does squish miserliness and is a camper.
$hypothesis$ = the conveyance squishes miserliness and is a camper. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is cogitative it repots tympanoplasty. sent2: if the conveyance is a Mwera the fact that it does repot out-basket hold. sent3: that something does repot tympanoplasty or does not squish miserliness or both does not hold if it is not cogitative. sent4: the fact that something squishes miserliness and is a kind of a camper is false if it is not a braid. sent5: the fact that the conveyance is moneyless is correct. sent6: if the chokey braids then it does bulge. sent7: the monotheist does not repot tympanoplasty and is cogitative if it is moneyless. sent8: the sealskin is not a kind of a Potemkin if that it repots tympanoplasty and/or it does not squish miserliness is false. sent9: if something is a Potemkin and it is a braid then it does not repot tympanoplasty. sent10: the sealskin is not cogitative if it is moneyless and it is a generic. sent11: if the monotheist does not repot tympanoplasty the sealskin does not repot tympanoplasty. sent12: if the sealskin does not repot tympanoplasty the conveyance does braid and squishes miserliness. sent13: if something is crucial and it is a Miller then it is not a overachievement. sent14: that something is a birdfeeder and it does squish stump does not hold if it does not squish poisoning. sent15: the conveyance is a Potemkin. sent16: that the conveyance squishes karate and is a camper is not correct. sent17: the capuchin is not a camper if that the conveyance is not a camper is true. sent18: the conveyance smooths. sent19: the conveyance is cogitative if it is moneyless. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the conveyance does braid.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the conveyance is a Potemkin and it is a braid.; sent9 -> int2: the fact that if the conveyance is the Potemkin that braids the fact that the conveyance does not repot tympanoplasty hold is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the conveyance does not repot tympanoplasty.; sent1 -> int4: if the conveyance is not non-cogitative then it repots tympanoplasty.; sent19 & sent5 -> int5: the conveyance is cogitative.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the conveyance repots tympanoplasty is not incorrect.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the conveyance is not a braid.; sent4 -> int9: the fact that the conveyance squishes miserliness and it is a kind of a camper is false if it is not a braid.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__