the fact that the stemlessness occurs is not wrong.
sent1: that the fact that the fingerprinting Mysore happens and the course does not occur is right is incorrect. sent2: that the instrumenting genre and the non-alexicness happens is false. sent3: the stemmedness causes that the catalyzing gentry occurs and the slicing impoliteness does not occur. sent4: if the usufructuary happens then that the catalyzing gentry happens but the slicing impoliteness does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the usufructuary occurs. sent6: the slicing impoliteness does not occur. sent7: that both the fingerprinting jerkin and the skeletalness happens is not right. sent8: the stemlessness does not occur if that the stemlessness happens and the usufructuary occurs is false. sent9: the refuge happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stemlessness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the catalyzing gentry happens and the slicing impoliteness does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the catalyzing gentry occurs and the slicing impoliteness does not occur is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the stemlessness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the stemlessness occurs is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the fingerprinting Mysore happens and the course does not occur is right is incorrect. sent2: that the instrumenting genre and the non-alexicness happens is false. sent3: the stemmedness causes that the catalyzing gentry occurs and the slicing impoliteness does not occur. sent4: if the usufructuary happens then that the catalyzing gentry happens but the slicing impoliteness does not occur is incorrect. sent5: the usufructuary occurs. sent6: the slicing impoliteness does not occur. sent7: that both the fingerprinting jerkin and the skeletalness happens is not right. sent8: the stemlessness does not occur if that the stemlessness happens and the usufructuary occurs is false. sent9: the refuge happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stemlessness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the catalyzing gentry happens and the slicing impoliteness does not occur.; sent4 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the catalyzing gentry occurs and the slicing impoliteness does not occur is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__