the closedness does not occur.
sent1: that the impasto does not occur and the destructibleness happens is not right. sent2: the prorogation occurs and the bionicness happens. sent3: if the prorogation and the relining atonement occurs then the closing does not occur. sent4: if that not the impasto but the destructibleness happens does not hold the relining atonement occurs.
sent2 -> int1: the prorogation happens.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the relining atonement happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the prorogation and the relining atonement happens.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the closedness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the impasto does not occur and the destructibleness happens is not right. sent2: the prorogation occurs and the bionicness happens. sent3: if the prorogation and the relining atonement occurs then the closing does not occur. sent4: if that not the impasto but the destructibleness happens does not hold the relining atonement occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the prorogation happens.; sent4 & sent1 -> int2: the relining atonement happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the prorogation and the relining atonement happens.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__