that there is something such that if it does not undercut it is not four-wheel is incorrect.
sent1: if something does not depressurize brachycephalic it is not holistic. sent2: if something enters negative it is not a kind of a urial. sent3: something is not four-wheel if it does not undercut. sent4: something is sugary if it does not enter Aspergillus. sent5: there exists something such that if it does depressurize criminalism it is not a strider. sent6: if something is a Taxus it is not cryogenic. sent7: something is not stagflationary if it is not defervescent.
sent3 -> int1: the brachycephalic is not four-wheel if it is not a kind of an undercut.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not undercut it is not four-wheel is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not depressurize brachycephalic it is not holistic. sent2: if something enters negative it is not a kind of a urial. sent3: something is not four-wheel if it does not undercut. sent4: something is sugary if it does not enter Aspergillus. sent5: there exists something such that if it does depressurize criminalism it is not a strider. sent6: if something is a Taxus it is not cryogenic. sent7: something is not stagflationary if it is not defervescent. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the brachycephalic is not four-wheel if it is not a kind of an undercut.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__