that the anaphrodisiacness and the bicipitalness occurs is not correct.
sent1: not the nonstop but the gorging neuron happens. sent2: the mammothermography occurs and the Anglicism happens if the shape-up does not occur. sent3: the fact that the shape-up occurs and the genialness occurs is true if the gorging Thursday does not occur. sent4: if the arboriculture does not occur the Anglicism occurs. sent5: the gorging Thursday does not occur if the nonstop does not occur but the gorging neuron occurs. sent6: that the gorging grosgrain does not occur hold. sent7: that the handout does not occur brings about the directionalness. sent8: the indefeasibleness does not occur. sent9: if the thickness does not occur the gorging florilegium and the implausibleness happens. sent10: if the implausibleness occurs then the exhumation does not occur and the arboriculture does not occur. sent11: the nearness occurs and the recalcitrating occurs. sent12: the skinny-dip does not occur and the assembling anestrus does not occur. sent13: that not the thickness but the discoloration happens leads to that the anaphrodisiacness occurs. sent14: if the implausibleness does not occur then the fact that the anaphrodisiacness and the bicipitalness occurs is not true. sent15: that both the assembling RICO and the bicipitalness occurs is triggered by that the indefeasibleness does not occur. sent16: the anacliticness does not occur. sent17: the psychotherapeuticness occurs. sent18: the implausibleness occurs. sent19: both the non-thickness and the discoloration happens if that the gorging Tanacetum happens is incorrect. sent20: that the anacliticness happens is brought about by the non-counterterrorness. sent21: the technologicalness does not occur. sent22: the acrogenicness does not occur. sent23: that the couple does not occur but the Bruneian occurs prevents that the lodge does not occur. sent24: the non-Malaysianess prevents the non-hypothermicness. sent25: the gorging Tanacetum is prevented by that the Anglicism and the shape-up happens. sent26: both the comprehensibleness and the gorging coil happens.
sent10 & sent18 -> int1: the exhumation does not occur and the arboriculture does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the arboriculture does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the Anglicism happens is correct.; sent5 & sent1 -> int4: the gorging Thursday does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the shape-up occurs and the genialness happens.; int5 -> int6: the shape-up occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the Anglicism and the shape-up occurs.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: the gorging Tanacetum does not occur.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the non-thickness and the discoloration occurs.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the anaphrodisiacness occurs.; sent15 & sent8 -> int11: the assembling RICO happens and the bicipitalness occurs.; int11 -> int12: the bicipitalness happens.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis;
that the anaphrodisiacness and the bicipitalness occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = that the anaphrodisiacness and the bicipitalness occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: not the nonstop but the gorging neuron happens. sent2: the mammothermography occurs and the Anglicism happens if the shape-up does not occur. sent3: the fact that the shape-up occurs and the genialness occurs is true if the gorging Thursday does not occur. sent4: if the arboriculture does not occur the Anglicism occurs. sent5: the gorging Thursday does not occur if the nonstop does not occur but the gorging neuron occurs. sent6: that the gorging grosgrain does not occur hold. sent7: that the handout does not occur brings about the directionalness. sent8: the indefeasibleness does not occur. sent9: if the thickness does not occur the gorging florilegium and the implausibleness happens. sent10: if the implausibleness occurs then the exhumation does not occur and the arboriculture does not occur. sent11: the nearness occurs and the recalcitrating occurs. sent12: the skinny-dip does not occur and the assembling anestrus does not occur. sent13: that not the thickness but the discoloration happens leads to that the anaphrodisiacness occurs. sent14: if the implausibleness does not occur then the fact that the anaphrodisiacness and the bicipitalness occurs is not true. sent15: that both the assembling RICO and the bicipitalness occurs is triggered by that the indefeasibleness does not occur. sent16: the anacliticness does not occur. sent17: the psychotherapeuticness occurs. sent18: the implausibleness occurs. sent19: both the non-thickness and the discoloration happens if that the gorging Tanacetum happens is incorrect. sent20: that the anacliticness happens is brought about by the non-counterterrorness. sent21: the technologicalness does not occur. sent22: the acrogenicness does not occur. sent23: that the couple does not occur but the Bruneian occurs prevents that the lodge does not occur. sent24: the non-Malaysianess prevents the non-hypothermicness. sent25: the gorging Tanacetum is prevented by that the Anglicism and the shape-up happens. sent26: both the comprehensibleness and the gorging coil happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent18 -> int1: the exhumation does not occur and the arboriculture does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the arboriculture does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the Anglicism happens is correct.; sent5 & sent1 -> int4: the gorging Thursday does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the shape-up occurs and the genialness happens.; int5 -> int6: the shape-up occurs.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the Anglicism and the shape-up occurs.; int7 & sent25 -> int8: the gorging Tanacetum does not occur.; int8 & sent19 -> int9: the non-thickness and the discoloration occurs.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the anaphrodisiacness occurs.; sent15 & sent8 -> int11: the assembling RICO happens and the bicipitalness occurs.; int11 -> int12: the bicipitalness happens.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__