that the maturation is not pediatric or it is a kind of a Ezekiel or both is not right.
sent1: if something that is indiscriminate is bottomless the maturation is not pediatric. sent2: the maturation is not a araroba if there exists something such that it is both Cyprian and pediatric. sent3: either the straight is not febrile or it is insensitive or both. sent4: if something is not indiscriminate then that it is not pediatric and/or it is a kind of a Ezekiel does not hold. sent5: there is something such that it is indiscriminate and it is bottomless. sent6: if something does not besot Cambridge it is not a kind of a araroba and it is amylolytic. sent7: that something is not indiscriminate and it is not bottomless does not hold if it is not pediatric. sent8: if the cynodont is bottomed the maturation is not indiscriminate. sent9: there is something such that it is indiscriminate. sent10: the maturation is pediatric and/or it is a kind of a Ezekiel. sent11: the fact that the jacksnipe is robust and it does besot Cambridge is not right. sent12: the Federal is not pediatric. sent13: the maturation is not a kind of a writer and/or it is a kind of a Atrovent. sent14: there exists something such that it is bottomless.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the maturation is not pediatric.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the numismatist is not a ballot or a Ezekiel or both.
sent7 -> int2: if the pneumatophore is not pediatric then the fact that it is not indiscriminate and it is not bottomless does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the maturation is not pediatric or it is a kind of a Ezekiel or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is indiscriminate is bottomless the maturation is not pediatric. sent2: the maturation is not a araroba if there exists something such that it is both Cyprian and pediatric. sent3: either the straight is not febrile or it is insensitive or both. sent4: if something is not indiscriminate then that it is not pediatric and/or it is a kind of a Ezekiel does not hold. sent5: there is something such that it is indiscriminate and it is bottomless. sent6: if something does not besot Cambridge it is not a kind of a araroba and it is amylolytic. sent7: that something is not indiscriminate and it is not bottomless does not hold if it is not pediatric. sent8: if the cynodont is bottomed the maturation is not indiscriminate. sent9: there is something such that it is indiscriminate. sent10: the maturation is pediatric and/or it is a kind of a Ezekiel. sent11: the fact that the jacksnipe is robust and it does besot Cambridge is not right. sent12: the Federal is not pediatric. sent13: the maturation is not a kind of a writer and/or it is a kind of a Atrovent. sent14: there exists something such that it is bottomless. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the maturation is not pediatric.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__