the fact that the destining metier does not occur and the geysering pentoxifylline does not occur is not true.
sent1: the fact that the intellectualness does not occur and the abruption does not occur is not correct. sent2: the fact that the major does not occur and the myalgicness does not occur is not true. sent3: the non-myalgicness is triggered by that the destining metier does not occur and the geysering pentoxifylline does not occur. sent4: the compaction does not occur and the striating does not occur. sent5: the scalding Nixon happens and/or the blondness happens. sent6: if the scalding Nixon happens and/or the blond occurs then the fact that the majorness does not occur is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the destining metier does not occur and the geysering pentoxifylline does not occur hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the myalgicness does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the majoring does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the major does not occur and the myalgicness does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the destining metier does not occur and the geysering pentoxifylline does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the intellectualness does not occur and the abruption does not occur is not correct. sent2: the fact that the major does not occur and the myalgicness does not occur is not true. sent3: the non-myalgicness is triggered by that the destining metier does not occur and the geysering pentoxifylline does not occur. sent4: the compaction does not occur and the striating does not occur. sent5: the scalding Nixon happens and/or the blondness happens. sent6: if the scalding Nixon happens and/or the blond occurs then the fact that the majorness does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the destining metier does not occur and the geysering pentoxifylline does not occur hold.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the myalgicness does not occur.; sent6 & sent5 -> int2: the majoring does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the major does not occur and the myalgicness does not occur.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__