if the esophagus is not a trustee the motilin does equivocate and it is an expressionist.
sent1: the fact that the yearbook does not down esophagus but it does photosensitize handsaw is not true if the esophagus is not a kind of a trustee. sent2: that the yearbook does not down esophagus and does not photosensitize handsaw is not right if the esophagus is not a trustee. sent3: the esophagus photosensitizes handsaw and is a fleapit. sent4: the motilin does equivocate. sent5: the fact that the yearbook does not photosensitize handsaw and is not licit is not true. sent6: if the fact that the esophagus is a kind of a trustee is correct then the fact that the yearbook does not down esophagus and does not photosensitize handsaw is not right. sent7: if the motilin does equivocate then that the yearbook is non-expressionist and does not photosensitize handsaw is not right. sent8: the yearbook equivocates and is an expressionist if the motilin does not photosensitize handsaw. sent9: the motilin does photosensitize handsaw and is an expressionist if the yearbook does equivocate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the esophagus is not a trustee.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the yearbook does not down esophagus and does not photosensitize handsaw is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = if the esophagus is not a trustee the motilin does equivocate and it is an expressionist. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the yearbook does not down esophagus but it does photosensitize handsaw is not true if the esophagus is not a kind of a trustee. sent2: that the yearbook does not down esophagus and does not photosensitize handsaw is not right if the esophagus is not a trustee. sent3: the esophagus photosensitizes handsaw and is a fleapit. sent4: the motilin does equivocate. sent5: the fact that the yearbook does not photosensitize handsaw and is not licit is not true. sent6: if the fact that the esophagus is a kind of a trustee is correct then the fact that the yearbook does not down esophagus and does not photosensitize handsaw is not right. sent7: if the motilin does equivocate then that the yearbook is non-expressionist and does not photosensitize handsaw is not right. sent8: the yearbook equivocates and is an expressionist if the motilin does not photosensitize handsaw. sent9: the motilin does photosensitize handsaw and is an expressionist if the yearbook does equivocate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the esophagus is not a trustee.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the yearbook does not down esophagus and does not photosensitize handsaw is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__