the oppression does not occur and the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the tottering does not occur and the memorializing Floridian occurs does not hold the blueing Tiepolo happens. sent2: the fact that the fact that the oppression does not occur and the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur is not right is right if the wrestling curvature occurs. sent3: the powdering morale happens. sent4: the blueing Tiepolo and/or that the anacliticness happens causes that the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur. sent5: that the wrestling curvature happens and/or the archivalness yields that the powdering morale does not occur. sent6: if the archivalness does not occur then that not the tottering but the memorializing Floridian occurs is false. sent7: the oppression does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archivalness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the wrestling curvature occurs and/or the archivalness happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the powdering morale does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the archivalness does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the tottering does not occur but the memorializing Floridian happens is wrong.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the blueing Tiepolo occurs.; int6 -> int7: either the blueing Tiepolo occurs or the anacliticness occurs or both.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
that the oppression does not occur and the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur is not true.
$hypothesis$ = the oppression does not occur and the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the tottering does not occur and the memorializing Floridian occurs does not hold the blueing Tiepolo happens. sent2: the fact that the fact that the oppression does not occur and the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur is not right is right if the wrestling curvature occurs. sent3: the powdering morale happens. sent4: the blueing Tiepolo and/or that the anacliticness happens causes that the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur. sent5: that the wrestling curvature happens and/or the archivalness yields that the powdering morale does not occur. sent6: if the archivalness does not occur then that not the tottering but the memorializing Floridian occurs is false. sent7: the oppression does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archivalness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the wrestling curvature occurs and/or the archivalness happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the powdering morale does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the archivalness does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the tottering does not occur but the memorializing Floridian happens is wrong.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the blueing Tiepolo occurs.; int6 -> int7: either the blueing Tiepolo occurs or the anacliticness occurs or both.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the wrestling Tiepolo does not occur.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__