the stonecress is uric.
sent1: the chronicler is a hagberry. sent2: if the chronicler is a hagberry and/or opening then the stonecress is not uric. sent3: the stonecress does not open. sent4: the FET is not uric. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a Scythian then that the chronicler is a substation and it is uric does not hold. sent6: the stonecress is a Scythian. sent7: the stonecress is not uric if the chronicler is an opening.
sent1 -> int1: the chronicler is a hagberry or it is an opening or both.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the scrapbook is a hagberry.
sent6 -> int2: there are Scythian things.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the chronicler is a substation that is uric is false.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a substation and it is uric is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the stonecress is uric. ; $context$ = sent1: the chronicler is a hagberry. sent2: if the chronicler is a hagberry and/or opening then the stonecress is not uric. sent3: the stonecress does not open. sent4: the FET is not uric. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a Scythian then that the chronicler is a substation and it is uric does not hold. sent6: the stonecress is a Scythian. sent7: the stonecress is not uric if the chronicler is an opening. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the chronicler is a hagberry or it is an opening or both.; int1 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__