the benefactress is non-counterrevolutionary.
sent1: the fact that the frottage does form and does not frolic geoduck is false. sent2: there exists something such that it does not officialize Baal. sent3: the benefactress does not souse. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of musicological thing that does frolic geoduck does not hold then the knife-handle is not musicological. sent5: the benefactress is not counterrevolutionary if the frottage is a piece and is musicological. sent6: the fact that the frottage is musicological and it frolics geoduck does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the knife-handle is euphonious and does not frolic geoduck is not correct then it is not a Wake. sent8: something does not realign Pearmain if that it is a jacket and not a form is not true. sent9: the knife-handle does not realign benefactress. sent10: the knife-handle is a kind of a piece. sent11: if that something is not a kind of a piece and it is not a Wake is false then it is not a souse. sent12: the fact that the knife-handle frolics geoduck and does not form is not true if something does not officialize Baal. sent13: if something does not officialize Kanarese then it is a prospectus. sent14: there exists something such that it either is a isostasy or does souse or both. sent15: that the knife-handle is not a piece and is not musicological is not right if it is not euphonious. sent16: if something is not musicological the fact that it is not a piece and it is not a Wake is not correct. sent17: if the frottage is not a Wake then it does form. sent18: the frottage is not euphonious if it is not a form. sent19: if the knife-handle is a Wake then the frottage does piece. sent20: the knife-handle is a Wake if something is a isostasy. sent21: if something is not a souse then that it is a isostasy but not counterrevolutionary is incorrect. sent22: something is musicological if it is not euphonious. sent23: the frottage is not euphonious if that it does form and it does not frolic geoduck is not correct. sent24: that something is a isostasy and a souse is not right if that it is not a Wake hold. sent25: there is something such that either it does frolic geoduck or it is euphonious or both. sent26: the benefactress is not a kind of a isostasy. sent27: the knife-handle is a Wake if there exists something such that either it is a kind of a isostasy or it does souse or both.
sent14 & sent27 -> int1: the knife-handle is a Wake.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the frottage does piece.; sent22 -> int3: that the frottage is musicological is true if it is not euphonious.; sent23 & sent1 -> int4: the frottage is not euphonious.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the frottage is musicological.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the frottage is a piece and it is not non-musicological.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the importer does not realign Pearmain is right if the fact that it jackets and it is not a kind of a form does not hold.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the benefactress is non-counterrevolutionary. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the frottage does form and does not frolic geoduck is false. sent2: there exists something such that it does not officialize Baal. sent3: the benefactress does not souse. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of musicological thing that does frolic geoduck does not hold then the knife-handle is not musicological. sent5: the benefactress is not counterrevolutionary if the frottage is a piece and is musicological. sent6: the fact that the frottage is musicological and it frolics geoduck does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the knife-handle is euphonious and does not frolic geoduck is not correct then it is not a Wake. sent8: something does not realign Pearmain if that it is a jacket and not a form is not true. sent9: the knife-handle does not realign benefactress. sent10: the knife-handle is a kind of a piece. sent11: if that something is not a kind of a piece and it is not a Wake is false then it is not a souse. sent12: the fact that the knife-handle frolics geoduck and does not form is not true if something does not officialize Baal. sent13: if something does not officialize Kanarese then it is a prospectus. sent14: there exists something such that it either is a isostasy or does souse or both. sent15: that the knife-handle is not a piece and is not musicological is not right if it is not euphonious. sent16: if something is not musicological the fact that it is not a piece and it is not a Wake is not correct. sent17: if the frottage is not a Wake then it does form. sent18: the frottage is not euphonious if it is not a form. sent19: if the knife-handle is a Wake then the frottage does piece. sent20: the knife-handle is a Wake if something is a isostasy. sent21: if something is not a souse then that it is a isostasy but not counterrevolutionary is incorrect. sent22: something is musicological if it is not euphonious. sent23: the frottage is not euphonious if that it does form and it does not frolic geoduck is not correct. sent24: that something is a isostasy and a souse is not right if that it is not a Wake hold. sent25: there is something such that either it does frolic geoduck or it is euphonious or both. sent26: the benefactress is not a kind of a isostasy. sent27: the knife-handle is a Wake if there exists something such that either it is a kind of a isostasy or it does souse or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent27 -> int1: the knife-handle is a Wake.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the frottage does piece.; sent22 -> int3: that the frottage is musicological is true if it is not euphonious.; sent23 & sent1 -> int4: the frottage is not euphonious.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the frottage is musicological.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the frottage is a piece and it is not non-musicological.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__