the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of a Ischia and it does blemish Tungus is wrong is not correct.
sent1: that something does busy and it is a kind of a Ischia is wrong if it does not abjure annexation. sent2: there exists something such that that it is a dioxin and it is a kind of a compaction is not true. sent3: something that is a couple blemishes Tungus. sent4: something is not a Rappahannock. sent5: there is something such that the fact that that it is schismatic and it is a saint is not false does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a prefecture. sent7: there exists something such that it does abjure Ichthyosauridae. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Dunker and it is not non-anisogametic. sent9: there exists something such that it does align and it blemishes Muslimah. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not blemish guzzler the fact that the start is both a tumbrel and a sericulturist is not right. sent11: there exists something such that it is a Ischia and it does blemish Tungus. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a pituitary. sent13: the fact that the start does abjure annexation and does abjure thermohydrometer is not right if there exists something such that it is not a Gretzky. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a compaction. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is nonfictional and blemishes milliliter is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the manipulator does abjure annexation and blemishes manipulator does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it does not abjure annexation. sent18: the fact that the start is a Brya and it does abjure annexation is not right. sent19: there exists something such that it does abjure annexation. sent20: the fact that the start is a Ischia that blemishes Tungus is not true if there is something such that it does not abjure annexation.
sent17 & sent20 -> int1: that the start is a kind of a Ischia and it does blemish Tungus does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Tungus is busy a Ischia is incorrect.
sent1 -> int2: if the Tungus does not abjure annexation that it is a kind of busy a Ischia is incorrect.; sent3 -> int3: the Tungus does blemish Tungus if it couples.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that that it is a kind of a Ischia and it does blemish Tungus is wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does busy and it is a kind of a Ischia is wrong if it does not abjure annexation. sent2: there exists something such that that it is a dioxin and it is a kind of a compaction is not true. sent3: something that is a couple blemishes Tungus. sent4: something is not a Rappahannock. sent5: there is something such that the fact that that it is schismatic and it is a saint is not false does not hold. sent6: there is something such that it is a kind of a prefecture. sent7: there exists something such that it does abjure Ichthyosauridae. sent8: there exists something such that it is a Dunker and it is not non-anisogametic. sent9: there exists something such that it does align and it blemishes Muslimah. sent10: if there exists something such that it does not blemish guzzler the fact that the start is both a tumbrel and a sericulturist is not right. sent11: there exists something such that it is a Ischia and it does blemish Tungus. sent12: there exists something such that it is not a pituitary. sent13: the fact that the start does abjure annexation and does abjure thermohydrometer is not right if there exists something such that it is not a Gretzky. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a compaction. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is nonfictional and blemishes milliliter is incorrect. sent16: the fact that the manipulator does abjure annexation and blemishes manipulator does not hold. sent17: there is something such that it does not abjure annexation. sent18: the fact that the start is a Brya and it does abjure annexation is not right. sent19: there exists something such that it does abjure annexation. sent20: the fact that the start is a Ischia that blemishes Tungus is not true if there is something such that it does not abjure annexation. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 & sent20 -> int1: that the start is a kind of a Ischia and it does blemish Tungus does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__