the overgarment is cacodylic.
sent1: if the chlorophyll is not an octillion then the croupier is cacodylic and it is a Methodist. sent2: if that the overgarment does not narrate airframe and is ropy does not hold it is not an ergotism. sent3: something is both a copula and cacodylic if it is not an ergotism. sent4: that the reincarnation is a kind of an octillion is true if it is a kind of a Methodist. sent5: the fact that the overgarment does not narrate airframe and is not non-ropy is not right if the croupier is not an octillion. sent6: if the overgarment does narrate airframe it is not an ergotism. sent7: everything does not narrate airframe. sent8: if the croupier is cacodylic then the overgarment is not cacodylic. sent9: the croupier is Methodist. sent10: that the overgarment narrates airframe and it is ropy is not right. sent11: The fact that the aleph-null does bind croupier is not incorrect. sent12: if the croupier is a Methodist and an octillion it does not bind aleph-null.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the croupier is an octillion hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the croupier is Methodist and it is an octillion.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the croupier does not bind aleph-null.; sent3 -> int3: if that the overgarment is not an ergotism is true it is a copula that is cacodylic.;
the reincarnation is a kind of an octillion.
$hypothesis$ = the overgarment is cacodylic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chlorophyll is not an octillion then the croupier is cacodylic and it is a Methodist. sent2: if that the overgarment does not narrate airframe and is ropy does not hold it is not an ergotism. sent3: something is both a copula and cacodylic if it is not an ergotism. sent4: that the reincarnation is a kind of an octillion is true if it is a kind of a Methodist. sent5: the fact that the overgarment does not narrate airframe and is not non-ropy is not right if the croupier is not an octillion. sent6: if the overgarment does narrate airframe it is not an ergotism. sent7: everything does not narrate airframe. sent8: if the croupier is cacodylic then the overgarment is not cacodylic. sent9: the croupier is Methodist. sent10: that the overgarment narrates airframe and it is ropy is not right. sent11: The fact that the aleph-null does bind croupier is not incorrect. sent12: if the croupier is a Methodist and an octillion it does not bind aleph-null. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the croupier is an octillion hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the croupier is Methodist and it is an octillion.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the croupier does not bind aleph-null.; sent3 -> int3: if that the overgarment is not an ergotism is true it is a copula that is cacodylic.; __UNKNOWN__