there is something such that it does not sniff shrillness.
sent1: if that the vapor is a morbidity hold then that the baldric is not a Cercopidae and/or scouts horseshoe does not hold. sent2: the protein is not a Dracunculidae if that the monohydrate does not sniff shrillness or flees or both is not right. sent3: the tam immerses if it is a WAN. sent4: that the tam is a WAN is true if the fact that the sachet does not flee or it is a maniac or both is not right. sent5: the monohydrate is not technophobic. sent6: that the monohydrate is not a Dracunculidae or it is technophobic or both does not hold if the tam does immerse. sent7: the tam sniffs shrillness. sent8: the fact that the protein does not consolidate Skuld and/or is an isomorphism is not right. sent9: the monohydrate does not flee. sent10: the fact that if the vapor is the morbidity then the vapor does not flee is true. sent11: if the sachet is a kind of a safe the vapor is a morbidity. sent12: if that the monohydrate is not a Dracunculidae or it is technophobic or both does not hold then the protein does not sniff shrillness. sent13: the vapor is not a kind of a safe. sent14: the vapor does not flee if it is a morbidity and/or it is not a safe. sent15: that the sachet is not a maniac is not incorrect.
sent13 -> int1: the vapor either is a morbidity or is not a kind of a safe or both.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the vapor does not flee.;
that the baldric either is not a kind of a Cercopidae or scouts horseshoe or both does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it does not sniff shrillness. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the vapor is a morbidity hold then that the baldric is not a Cercopidae and/or scouts horseshoe does not hold. sent2: the protein is not a Dracunculidae if that the monohydrate does not sniff shrillness or flees or both is not right. sent3: the tam immerses if it is a WAN. sent4: that the tam is a WAN is true if the fact that the sachet does not flee or it is a maniac or both is not right. sent5: the monohydrate is not technophobic. sent6: that the monohydrate is not a Dracunculidae or it is technophobic or both does not hold if the tam does immerse. sent7: the tam sniffs shrillness. sent8: the fact that the protein does not consolidate Skuld and/or is an isomorphism is not right. sent9: the monohydrate does not flee. sent10: the fact that if the vapor is the morbidity then the vapor does not flee is true. sent11: if the sachet is a kind of a safe the vapor is a morbidity. sent12: if that the monohydrate is not a Dracunculidae or it is technophobic or both does not hold then the protein does not sniff shrillness. sent13: the vapor is not a kind of a safe. sent14: the vapor does not flee if it is a morbidity and/or it is not a safe. sent15: that the sachet is not a maniac is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the vapor either is a morbidity or is not a kind of a safe or both.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the vapor does not flee.; __UNKNOWN__