the fact that the extending oxtail occurs and the chassing does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the sliming Babylon leads to that the premenstrualness happens. sent2: the vault occurs and the resoluteness happens. sent3: if that the substitute happens and the splurge does not occur does not hold then the prefecturalness happens. sent4: the harshness triggers that the sliming Babylon occurs. sent5: if the golfing does not occur the fact that the extending oxtail but not the chassing occurs is incorrect. sent6: the harshness occurs if the ungenerousness happens. sent7: that the substitute but not the splurging happens is not correct if the vaulting happens. sent8: if the premenstrualness and the prefecturalness occurs the golfing does not occur.
sent2 -> int1: the vaulting occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the substitute occurs but the splurging does not occur is not true.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the prefecturalness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the extending oxtail occurs and the chassing does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the sliming Babylon leads to that the premenstrualness happens. sent2: the vault occurs and the resoluteness happens. sent3: if that the substitute happens and the splurge does not occur does not hold then the prefecturalness happens. sent4: the harshness triggers that the sliming Babylon occurs. sent5: if the golfing does not occur the fact that the extending oxtail but not the chassing occurs is incorrect. sent6: the harshness occurs if the ungenerousness happens. sent7: that the substitute but not the splurging happens is not correct if the vaulting happens. sent8: if the premenstrualness and the prefecturalness occurs the golfing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the vaulting occurs.; sent7 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the substitute occurs but the splurging does not occur is not true.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the prefecturalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__