the mako is systematics.
sent1: something is not a dagame if it is scotomatous and/or it is not a kind of a muster. sent2: the fact that the anchorage is not presentational is not wrong if the fact that it is presentational and it is not a kola is wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a rhombus. sent4: the anchorage is not scotomatous. sent5: that the anchorage is a kind of a dagame is correct if the fact that it is presentational is wrong. sent6: the stethoscope incriminates sociality if it chances isoclinal. sent7: the stethoscope is a muster and does incriminate Ceratopogon if it is not scotomatous. sent8: the anchorage is not a Logrono. sent9: the anchorage is a Logrono if it is a rhombus. sent10: if the anchorage is not systematics then it does incriminate Ceratopogon and is a kind of a dagame. sent11: the stethoscope is not scotomatous if the anchorage is not a kind of a muster but it is presentational. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does muster and it does incriminate Ceratopogon is not wrong then the mako is systematics. sent13: the fact that the stethoscope is not scotomatous is not false if the anchorage is both not a rhombus and a dagame.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anchorage is a rhombus.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the anchorage is a Logrono.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the anchorage is not a rhombus.;
the stethoscope does not chance glowing.
sent1 -> int4: the anchorage is not a dagame if either it is scotomatous or it is not a muster or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the mako is systematics. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a dagame if it is scotomatous and/or it is not a kind of a muster. sent2: the fact that the anchorage is not presentational is not wrong if the fact that it is presentational and it is not a kola is wrong. sent3: there is something such that it is a rhombus. sent4: the anchorage is not scotomatous. sent5: that the anchorage is a kind of a dagame is correct if the fact that it is presentational is wrong. sent6: the stethoscope incriminates sociality if it chances isoclinal. sent7: the stethoscope is a muster and does incriminate Ceratopogon if it is not scotomatous. sent8: the anchorage is not a Logrono. sent9: the anchorage is a Logrono if it is a rhombus. sent10: if the anchorage is not systematics then it does incriminate Ceratopogon and is a kind of a dagame. sent11: the stethoscope is not scotomatous if the anchorage is not a kind of a muster but it is presentational. sent12: if there exists something such that that it does muster and it does incriminate Ceratopogon is not wrong then the mako is systematics. sent13: the fact that the stethoscope is not scotomatous is not false if the anchorage is both not a rhombus and a dagame. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anchorage is a rhombus.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the anchorage is a Logrono.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the anchorage is not a rhombus.; __UNKNOWN__