that the eponymy is non-Belgian thing that is not calcific does not hold.
sent1: if the wicker is not calcific then the eponymy is not a Belgian. sent2: if the wicker is not calcific then the eponymy is not a kind of a Belgian and is not calcific. sent3: there exists something such that it is an eyelet. sent4: something is not semiotics. sent5: the fact that the doorsill miscasts and is not semiotics does not hold if something is not an eyelet. sent6: the eponymy is not Belgian. sent7: that the doorsill does miscast and it is semiotics does not hold. sent8: if the doorsill is semiotics the fact that the wicker is not calcific is not incorrect. sent9: that something is non-Belgian and is not calcific is not right if it is not an eyelet. sent10: if the doorsill enfranchises fibrosity then the eponymy is semiotics. sent11: there is something such that it is not an eyelet. sent12: something that is semiotics is not an eyelet and does not miscast. sent13: if that the doorsill does not enfranchise fibrosity and is not a kind of a Marconi is false it does enfranchise fibrosity. sent14: there is something such that it is not calcific. sent15: the wicker is not calcific if the fact that the doorsill does miscast but it is non-semiotics is false.
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: that the doorsill does miscast but it is not semiotics is not correct.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the wicker is not calcific.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the eponymy is a kind of non-Belgian thing that is not calcific is false is correct.
sent9 -> int3: if the eponymy is not an eyelet then the fact that it is a kind of non-Belgian thing that is not calcific is wrong.; sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the eponymy is semiotics hold then it is not an eyelet and does not miscast.;
$hypothesis$ = that the eponymy is non-Belgian thing that is not calcific does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wicker is not calcific then the eponymy is not a Belgian. sent2: if the wicker is not calcific then the eponymy is not a kind of a Belgian and is not calcific. sent3: there exists something such that it is an eyelet. sent4: something is not semiotics. sent5: the fact that the doorsill miscasts and is not semiotics does not hold if something is not an eyelet. sent6: the eponymy is not Belgian. sent7: that the doorsill does miscast and it is semiotics does not hold. sent8: if the doorsill is semiotics the fact that the wicker is not calcific is not incorrect. sent9: that something is non-Belgian and is not calcific is not right if it is not an eyelet. sent10: if the doorsill enfranchises fibrosity then the eponymy is semiotics. sent11: there is something such that it is not an eyelet. sent12: something that is semiotics is not an eyelet and does not miscast. sent13: if that the doorsill does not enfranchise fibrosity and is not a kind of a Marconi is false it does enfranchise fibrosity. sent14: there is something such that it is not calcific. sent15: the wicker is not calcific if the fact that the doorsill does miscast but it is non-semiotics is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent5 -> int1: that the doorsill does miscast but it is not semiotics is not correct.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the wicker is not calcific.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__