the fact that there exists something such that if it is attritional and it does crook boil then it does not dominate is false.
sent1: that the Irishman does not dominate hold if it is attritional and it crooks boil. sent2: if the Teflon is both attritional and a methacholine the fact that it does clank fitness is true. sent3: there is something such that if it is both low-tech and fiscal it is not a formal. sent4: the pullback does not dominate if it is a kind of a effleurage and does clank tallow. sent5: that there is something such that if it clanks Sayda and is dissimilar then it is non-neolithic is correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it is attritional and crooks boil it does dominate. sent7: if the Irishman ammoniates Lygus and it does dominate then it does not deem. sent8: something does not crook Teflon if it is econometrics and it does dominate. sent9: there is something such that if it is incorrect and it is a slave-maker then it does not clank obelisk. sent10: there is something such that if it is a monosemy that is a kind of an undercoat it does not ammoniate vapor. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a beads and is a counterfeit then it is not a kind of a slave-maker. sent12: the Irishman dominates if it is a kind of attritional thing that crooks boil.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
if the bladder is econometrics and does dominate then it does not crook Teflon.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is attritional and it does crook boil then it does not dominate is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Irishman does not dominate hold if it is attritional and it crooks boil. sent2: if the Teflon is both attritional and a methacholine the fact that it does clank fitness is true. sent3: there is something such that if it is both low-tech and fiscal it is not a formal. sent4: the pullback does not dominate if it is a kind of a effleurage and does clank tallow. sent5: that there is something such that if it clanks Sayda and is dissimilar then it is non-neolithic is correct. sent6: there exists something such that if it is attritional and crooks boil it does dominate. sent7: if the Irishman ammoniates Lygus and it does dominate then it does not deem. sent8: something does not crook Teflon if it is econometrics and it does dominate. sent9: there is something such that if it is incorrect and it is a slave-maker then it does not clank obelisk. sent10: there is something such that if it is a monosemy that is a kind of an undercoat it does not ammoniate vapor. sent11: there is something such that if it is a kind of a beads and is a counterfeit then it is not a kind of a slave-maker. sent12: the Irishman dominates if it is a kind of attritional thing that crooks boil. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__