there exists something such that if it patches that it is croupy and it is non-interfacial is false.
sent1: the fact that something is both croupy and non-interfacial is incorrect if it does patch. sent2: there exists something such that if it does patch then it is croupy but not interfacial. sent3: the fact that something is a moot but not a whisk if it is concretistic is right. sent4: the fact that something is croupy and is interfacial does not hold if it does patch. sent5: there is something such that if it does patch the fact that it is croupy and it is interfacial is wrong. sent6: if the oriflamme is a kind of a patched then it is croupy and it is not interfacial. sent7: the sunroof is a patched that does not suborn gamma if it rumors. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Victorian then it does gather pecan and is not a submersible. sent9: if the oriflamme does patch then the fact that it is both croupy and interfacial is wrong.
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the oriflamme is croupy but it is not interfacial does not hold if it is a patched.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it patches that it is croupy and it is non-interfacial is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is both croupy and non-interfacial is incorrect if it does patch. sent2: there exists something such that if it does patch then it is croupy but not interfacial. sent3: the fact that something is a moot but not a whisk if it is concretistic is right. sent4: the fact that something is croupy and is interfacial does not hold if it does patch. sent5: there is something such that if it does patch the fact that it is croupy and it is interfacial is wrong. sent6: if the oriflamme is a kind of a patched then it is croupy and it is not interfacial. sent7: the sunroof is a patched that does not suborn gamma if it rumors. sent8: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Victorian then it does gather pecan and is not a submersible. sent9: if the oriflamme does patch then the fact that it is both croupy and interfacial is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the fact that the oriflamme is croupy but it is not interfacial does not hold if it is a patched.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__