that the Socinian is both tartaric and not a scope is wrong.
sent1: the whipper-in is anoxemic and it is a amnesic. sent2: something is astronautic. sent3: if the oligarch is anoxemic and it is astronautic the whipper-in is not astronautic. sent4: there exists something such that it is tartaric. sent5: if something is astronautic and it is autologous the hydromancer is tartaric. sent6: if the whipper-in is not autologous then it is amnesic. sent7: if something tinsels microdot it is astronautic. sent8: the oligarch tinsels microdot if that the hornist is a Thoreau but it does not incorporate seriema is not true. sent9: the deal is not a kind of a badness. sent10: the fact that the bin is a badness and it is a Thoreau is not incorrect. sent11: the Socinian is tartaric. sent12: the oligarch is not a kind of a amnesic if the whipper-in is anoxemic and it is a amnesic. sent13: the mouth is astronautic and is a dragonfly. sent14: if the bin is not a Thoreau then it is tartaric and is a kind of a badness. sent15: if something is not a amnesic then it is a kind of autologous thing that is a grounder. sent16: if something is not a kind of a badness then it is a amnesic. sent17: if the hydromancer is not non-tartaric the Socinian is a kind of non-tartaric thing that is not a kind of a scope. sent18: that that the hydromancer is scurfy and is not a cryptorchidy is not false is incorrect. sent19: if something does not tinsel hemisphere then it briefs traumatophobia and does tinsel logjam. sent20: the pyrostat is tartaric and it briefs traumatophobia. sent21: the hydromancer is a badness. sent22: that the whipper-in is a kind of a Thoreau and is not a kind of a amnesic is false. sent23: the oligarch is a kind of a funfair. sent24: the whipper-in is a amnesic that is not tartaric. sent25: if the bin is a kind of a Thoreau then that the hornist is a Thoreau but it does not incorporate seriema is false.
sent10 -> int1: the bin is a Thoreau.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the fact that the hornist is a Thoreau and does not incorporate seriema is not true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the oligarch does tinsel microdot.; sent7 -> int4: the oligarch is astronautic if it does tinsel microdot.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the oligarch is astronautic.; sent15 -> int6: if the oligarch is not a amnesic then it is autologous and it is a kind of a grounder.; sent12 & sent1 -> int7: the oligarch is not amnesic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the oligarch is autologous and it is a grounder.; int8 -> int9: the oligarch is autologous.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the oligarch is a kind of astronautic thing that is autologous.; int10 -> int11: something is astronautic and autologous.; int11 & sent5 -> int12: the hydromancer is tartaric.; int12 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Socinian is both tartaric and not a scope is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the whipper-in is anoxemic and it is a amnesic. sent2: something is astronautic. sent3: if the oligarch is anoxemic and it is astronautic the whipper-in is not astronautic. sent4: there exists something such that it is tartaric. sent5: if something is astronautic and it is autologous the hydromancer is tartaric. sent6: if the whipper-in is not autologous then it is amnesic. sent7: if something tinsels microdot it is astronautic. sent8: the oligarch tinsels microdot if that the hornist is a Thoreau but it does not incorporate seriema is not true. sent9: the deal is not a kind of a badness. sent10: the fact that the bin is a badness and it is a Thoreau is not incorrect. sent11: the Socinian is tartaric. sent12: the oligarch is not a kind of a amnesic if the whipper-in is anoxemic and it is a amnesic. sent13: the mouth is astronautic and is a dragonfly. sent14: if the bin is not a Thoreau then it is tartaric and is a kind of a badness. sent15: if something is not a amnesic then it is a kind of autologous thing that is a grounder. sent16: if something is not a kind of a badness then it is a amnesic. sent17: if the hydromancer is not non-tartaric the Socinian is a kind of non-tartaric thing that is not a kind of a scope. sent18: that that the hydromancer is scurfy and is not a cryptorchidy is not false is incorrect. sent19: if something does not tinsel hemisphere then it briefs traumatophobia and does tinsel logjam. sent20: the pyrostat is tartaric and it briefs traumatophobia. sent21: the hydromancer is a badness. sent22: that the whipper-in is a kind of a Thoreau and is not a kind of a amnesic is false. sent23: the oligarch is a kind of a funfair. sent24: the whipper-in is a amnesic that is not tartaric. sent25: if the bin is a kind of a Thoreau then that the hornist is a Thoreau but it does not incorporate seriema is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the bin is a Thoreau.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the fact that the hornist is a Thoreau and does not incorporate seriema is not true.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the oligarch does tinsel microdot.; sent7 -> int4: the oligarch is astronautic if it does tinsel microdot.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the oligarch is astronautic.; sent15 -> int6: if the oligarch is not a amnesic then it is autologous and it is a kind of a grounder.; sent12 & sent1 -> int7: the oligarch is not amnesic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the oligarch is autologous and it is a grounder.; int8 -> int9: the oligarch is autologous.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the oligarch is a kind of astronautic thing that is autologous.; int10 -> int11: something is astronautic and autologous.; int11 & sent5 -> int12: the hydromancer is tartaric.; int12 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__