that the inexcusableness happens prevents that the minorness occurs.
sent1: the predating guenon happens. sent2: the enlistment does not occur. sent3: that both the predating Reptilia and the biocatalyticness happens prevents that the perking does not occur. sent4: the Z occurs. sent5: the predating Coccyzus does not occur. sent6: that the cancellation but not the logrolling occurs results in that the contrapuntalness happens. sent7: the inexcusableness is prevented by that the perking occurs and the neurotropicness happens. sent8: the fact that the schematization does not occur is not incorrect if the deviltry and the recreating occurs. sent9: the non-neurotropicness or the unorthodoxness or both occurs. sent10: that both the predating Reptilia and the non-biocatalyticness occurs brings about that the perking happens. sent11: if both the perking and the neurotropicness occurs the inexcusableness happens. sent12: the biocatalyticness does not occur. sent13: if the windstorm occurs but the things does not occur then the fact that the scouting collards happens is right. sent14: the fact that the minorness does not occur is not incorrect if either the neurotropicness does not occur or the unorthodoxness does not occur or both. sent15: if the inexcusableness happens then the minorness occurs. sent16: the neurotropicness and/or the orthodoxness occurs. sent17: the overhead does not occur. sent18: the aquiferousness happens. sent19: the predating Reptilia happens and the biocatalyticness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inexcusableness occurs.; sent10 & sent19 -> int1: the perking occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the neurotropicness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the perking and the neurotropicness occurs.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the inexcusableness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the neurotropicness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the neurotropicness does not occur or the unorthodoxness does not occur or both.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the minorness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the inexcusableness happens prevents that the minorness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the predating guenon happens. sent2: the enlistment does not occur. sent3: that both the predating Reptilia and the biocatalyticness happens prevents that the perking does not occur. sent4: the Z occurs. sent5: the predating Coccyzus does not occur. sent6: that the cancellation but not the logrolling occurs results in that the contrapuntalness happens. sent7: the inexcusableness is prevented by that the perking occurs and the neurotropicness happens. sent8: the fact that the schematization does not occur is not incorrect if the deviltry and the recreating occurs. sent9: the non-neurotropicness or the unorthodoxness or both occurs. sent10: that both the predating Reptilia and the non-biocatalyticness occurs brings about that the perking happens. sent11: if both the perking and the neurotropicness occurs the inexcusableness happens. sent12: the biocatalyticness does not occur. sent13: if the windstorm occurs but the things does not occur then the fact that the scouting collards happens is right. sent14: the fact that the minorness does not occur is not incorrect if either the neurotropicness does not occur or the unorthodoxness does not occur or both. sent15: if the inexcusableness happens then the minorness occurs. sent16: the neurotropicness and/or the orthodoxness occurs. sent17: the overhead does not occur. sent18: the aquiferousness happens. sent19: the predating Reptilia happens and the biocatalyticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inexcusableness occurs.; sent10 & sent19 -> int1: the perking occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the neurotropicness occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: both the perking and the neurotropicness occurs.; sent7 & int2 -> int3: the inexcusableness does not occur.; assump1 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the neurotropicness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the neurotropicness does not occur or the unorthodoxness does not occur or both.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the minorness does not occur.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__