the uterus is stabling.
sent1: the paralegal is a kind of non-employable thing that is maleficent if that the uterus is a cactus is correct. sent2: something is not non-stabling if it is a Theban. sent3: if the fact that the crystallographer is a kind of unimportant thing that does not render ordinance is not right the uterus is an employable. sent4: if the parquetry does render ordinance the paralegal is not maleficent and is a cactus. sent5: that the paralegal is non-maleficent thing that is a cactus is wrong. sent6: the fact that the fact that the crystallographer is a kind of unimportant thing that renders ordinance is wrong is not incorrect if the parquetry does not renders ordinance. sent7: the fact that the crystallographer is not important and it does not render ordinance is false if the parquetry does not render ordinance.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parquetry renders ordinance.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the paralegal is not maleficent but it is a kind of a cactus.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the parquetry does not render ordinance.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the crystallographer is not important and does not render ordinance is not right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the uterus is employable.; sent2 -> int6: if the uterus is a kind of a Theban it is stabling.;
$hypothesis$ = the uterus is stabling. ; $context$ = sent1: the paralegal is a kind of non-employable thing that is maleficent if that the uterus is a cactus is correct. sent2: something is not non-stabling if it is a Theban. sent3: if the fact that the crystallographer is a kind of unimportant thing that does not render ordinance is not right the uterus is an employable. sent4: if the parquetry does render ordinance the paralegal is not maleficent and is a cactus. sent5: that the paralegal is non-maleficent thing that is a cactus is wrong. sent6: the fact that the fact that the crystallographer is a kind of unimportant thing that renders ordinance is wrong is not incorrect if the parquetry does not renders ordinance. sent7: the fact that the crystallographer is not important and it does not render ordinance is false if the parquetry does not render ordinance. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the parquetry renders ordinance.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the paralegal is not maleficent but it is a kind of a cactus.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the parquetry does not render ordinance.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the fact that the crystallographer is not important and does not render ordinance is not right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the uterus is employable.; sent2 -> int6: if the uterus is a kind of a Theban it is stabling.; __UNKNOWN__