that the cloaca is catechistic and/or it is unthinkable is wrong.
sent1: that something is catechistic or it is unthinkable or both is not right if it is not a kind of a sedan. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of non-acroscopic thing that does not jacket handful. sent3: the cloaca is not a kind of a sedan if something that is not acroscopic does not jacket handful.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the cloaca is not a sedan is not false.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the cloaca is catechistic and/or it is unthinkable does not hold if it is not a kind of a sedan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the cloaca is catechistic and/or it is unthinkable is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is catechistic or it is unthinkable or both is not right if it is not a kind of a sedan. sent2: there is something such that it is a kind of non-acroscopic thing that does not jacket handful. sent3: the cloaca is not a kind of a sedan if something that is not acroscopic does not jacket handful. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the cloaca is not a sedan is not false.; sent1 -> int2: the fact that the cloaca is catechistic and/or it is unthinkable does not hold if it is not a kind of a sedan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__