the fact that that the no-trump happens but the drowsing concreteness does not occur is triggered by that the ballet happens is not correct.
sent1: if the frustration does not occur then the boot happens or the reciprocating identification does not occur or both. sent2: the pyrolyticness and the unthematicness occurs if the allotropicness happens. sent3: that the frustration does not occur hold if the sanitation happens. sent4: the ballet does not occur if the no-trump occurs but the drowsing concreteness does not occur. sent5: the pacification and the non-Laoness occurs if the prevailing happens. sent6: the sanitation happens. sent7: if the fact that the fact that the no-trump occurs but the drowsing concreteness does not occur is wrong is not incorrect then the ballet does not occur. sent8: if the pyrolyticness occurs then the landmark occurs. sent9: the non-allotropicness is prevented by that the boot happens. sent10: the ballet does not occur if that the no-trump and the drowsing concreteness occurs is incorrect. sent11: that the no-trump and the drowsing concreteness happens is brought about by that the ballet occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the no-trump happens and the drowsing concreteness does not occur is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the ballet does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ballet happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the no-trump but not the drowsing concreteness occurs.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the landmark occurs and the reelection does not occur is not wrong.
sent3 & sent6 -> int4: the frustration does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the boot happens and/or the reciprocating identification does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the no-trump happens but the drowsing concreteness does not occur is triggered by that the ballet happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the frustration does not occur then the boot happens or the reciprocating identification does not occur or both. sent2: the pyrolyticness and the unthematicness occurs if the allotropicness happens. sent3: that the frustration does not occur hold if the sanitation happens. sent4: the ballet does not occur if the no-trump occurs but the drowsing concreteness does not occur. sent5: the pacification and the non-Laoness occurs if the prevailing happens. sent6: the sanitation happens. sent7: if the fact that the fact that the no-trump occurs but the drowsing concreteness does not occur is wrong is not incorrect then the ballet does not occur. sent8: if the pyrolyticness occurs then the landmark occurs. sent9: the non-allotropicness is prevented by that the boot happens. sent10: the ballet does not occur if that the no-trump and the drowsing concreteness occurs is incorrect. sent11: that the no-trump and the drowsing concreteness happens is brought about by that the ballet occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the no-trump happens and the drowsing concreteness does not occur is not true.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the ballet does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ballet happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the no-trump but not the drowsing concreteness occurs.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__