the Mason retreats.
sent1: the Mason is a Brecht. sent2: something that does not nod fourth is a retreat that is a Brecht. sent3: the leflunomide does not cancel stumping if that it does cancel majors and is not a organza is false. sent4: the Mason is not a retreat but it does nod fourth if the majors does connive. sent5: the Mason does retreat if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Brecht and/or it is a pheromone is false. sent6: something is a Brecht and/or it is a retreat. sent7: the cosmetologist is a organza that is a cymbid. sent8: the fact that the wonderberry is a kind of a Brecht and/or it is a pheromone is incorrect. sent9: the fact that if the succade is a ebbtide but it does not connive the majors does connive hold.
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a Brecht and/or a pheromone is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the altarpiece is a kind of a Brecht is correct.
sent2 -> int2: if the Mason does not nod fourth then it is a retreat and a Brecht.;
$hypothesis$ = the Mason retreats. ; $context$ = sent1: the Mason is a Brecht. sent2: something that does not nod fourth is a retreat that is a Brecht. sent3: the leflunomide does not cancel stumping if that it does cancel majors and is not a organza is false. sent4: the Mason is not a retreat but it does nod fourth if the majors does connive. sent5: the Mason does retreat if there exists something such that the fact that it is a Brecht and/or it is a pheromone is false. sent6: something is a Brecht and/or it is a retreat. sent7: the cosmetologist is a organza that is a cymbid. sent8: the fact that the wonderberry is a kind of a Brecht and/or it is a pheromone is incorrect. sent9: the fact that if the succade is a ebbtide but it does not connive the majors does connive hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a Brecht and/or a pheromone is not correct.; int1 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__