the cantilever is not a brush-off and/or it is not a tackle.
sent1: either the cantilever is a brush-off or it is not a tackle or both if the barouche is not a Ruskin. sent2: the dubnium is a hieroglyph. sent3: everything is a kind of a Mann. sent4: the cantilever is not a brush-off or not a tackle or both if the fact that the barouche is not a Ruskin is not wrong. sent5: the burden is a Mann and it is a kind of a three-dimensionality if the photocoagulator is not a hieroglyph. sent6: the photocoagulator is not a hieroglyph if the canonist is a hieroglyph and is duodenal. sent7: that the photocoagulator does not concoct and/or is not inattentive is not right. sent8: the burden is duodenal if that there exists something such that that it either does not concoct or is not inattentive or both does not hold is true. sent9: if the barouche is a Ruskin and it is a hieroglyph then the burden is not duodenal. sent10: the barouche does concoct and/or is not a Mann if the photocoagulator is not inattentive. sent11: the jump does not strip jump but it is inattentive. sent12: the setting does not concoct if there is something such that it does not strip jump and is inattentive. sent13: if the dubnium is a hieroglyph the canonist is a kind of a hieroglyph. sent14: if something is a kind of a three-dimensionality then it is a hieroglyph.
sent3 -> int1: the barouche is a kind of a Mann.; sent14 -> int2: that the barouche is a kind of a hieroglyph hold if it is a three-dimensionality.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barouche is a kind of a Ruskin.; sent7 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that either it does not concoct or it is not inattentive or both hold is not right.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the burden is duodenal.;
the fact that the cantilever is not a kind of a brush-off or it is not a tackle or both does not hold.
sent13 & sent2 -> int5: the canonist is a kind of a hieroglyph.; sent11 -> int6: there is something such that it does not strip jump and is inattentive.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the setting does not concoct.; int7 -> int8: something does not concoct.;
$hypothesis$ = the cantilever is not a brush-off and/or it is not a tackle. ; $context$ = sent1: either the cantilever is a brush-off or it is not a tackle or both if the barouche is not a Ruskin. sent2: the dubnium is a hieroglyph. sent3: everything is a kind of a Mann. sent4: the cantilever is not a brush-off or not a tackle or both if the fact that the barouche is not a Ruskin is not wrong. sent5: the burden is a Mann and it is a kind of a three-dimensionality if the photocoagulator is not a hieroglyph. sent6: the photocoagulator is not a hieroglyph if the canonist is a hieroglyph and is duodenal. sent7: that the photocoagulator does not concoct and/or is not inattentive is not right. sent8: the burden is duodenal if that there exists something such that that it either does not concoct or is not inattentive or both does not hold is true. sent9: if the barouche is a Ruskin and it is a hieroglyph then the burden is not duodenal. sent10: the barouche does concoct and/or is not a Mann if the photocoagulator is not inattentive. sent11: the jump does not strip jump but it is inattentive. sent12: the setting does not concoct if there is something such that it does not strip jump and is inattentive. sent13: if the dubnium is a hieroglyph the canonist is a kind of a hieroglyph. sent14: if something is a kind of a three-dimensionality then it is a hieroglyph. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the barouche is a kind of a Mann.; sent14 -> int2: that the barouche is a kind of a hieroglyph hold if it is a three-dimensionality.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barouche is a kind of a Ruskin.; sent7 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that either it does not concoct or it is not inattentive or both hold is not right.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the burden is duodenal.; __UNKNOWN__