the tailback does not redirect Rhus.
sent1: the tailback is a amphidiploid. sent2: the townsman is not precancerous if something does not purport and/or is not a flush. sent3: there exists something such that it vitriols Pachyrhizus. sent4: the fact that something redirects Rhus and vitriols Pachyrhizus is not true if it is not precancerous. sent5: something redirects Rhus. sent6: the tailback does vitriol Pachyrhizus. sent7: the fern is a geminate and is anapestic. sent8: the pinguecula is not a kind of a flush if there exists something such that that it is not subhuman and it is not a statesman is false. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a Edwardian. sent10: the fact that the fact that the truant is a kind of a pipage and is not a hirsuteness is not true hold. sent11: that something is not precancerous or it vitriols Pachyrhizus or both does not hold if it is a flush. sent12: if the truant is a hirsuteness the fact that it is not subhuman and not a statesman is not true. sent13: if that something is not precancerous or does vitriol Pachyrhizus or both is incorrect then it does not redirect Rhus. sent14: the implantation is effervescent and it vitriols basswood. sent15: if that something does purport but it is not a kind of a statesman does not hold it is a kind of a flush. sent16: if there exists something such that it is precancerous the tailback does vitriol Pachyrhizus. sent17: the Haitian redirects implantation and is phylogenetic. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it is precancerous hold the tailback vitriols Pachyrhizus and it redirects Rhus. sent19: something is precancerous. sent20: if there is something such that that it is a steenbok is not wrong then the tailback is a commonage that does redirect Rhus. sent21: that the wheatgrass vitriols Pachyrhizus is right. sent22: if the fact that the truant is a pipage and is not a hirsuteness does not hold then it is a kind of a hirsuteness.
sent19 & sent18 -> int1: the tailback vitriols Pachyrhizus and does redirect Rhus.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the tailback does not redirect Rhus.
sent4 -> int2: the fact that the townsman redirects Rhus and vitriols Pachyrhizus is not right if it is not precancerous.; sent22 & sent10 -> int3: the truant is a kind of a hirsuteness.; sent12 & int3 -> int4: that the truant is not subhuman and it is not a statesman is false.; int4 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is not subhuman and is not a statesman does not hold.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the pinguecula does not flush.; int6 -> int7: the pinguecula does not purport or it does not flush or both.; int7 -> int8: the fact that something does not purport or it is not a kind of a flush or both hold.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the townsman is not precancerous.; int2 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the townsman does redirect Rhus and it vitriols Pachyrhizus is not true.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that it redirects Rhus and does vitriol Pachyrhizus is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the tailback does not redirect Rhus. ; $context$ = sent1: the tailback is a amphidiploid. sent2: the townsman is not precancerous if something does not purport and/or is not a flush. sent3: there exists something such that it vitriols Pachyrhizus. sent4: the fact that something redirects Rhus and vitriols Pachyrhizus is not true if it is not precancerous. sent5: something redirects Rhus. sent6: the tailback does vitriol Pachyrhizus. sent7: the fern is a geminate and is anapestic. sent8: the pinguecula is not a kind of a flush if there exists something such that that it is not subhuman and it is not a statesman is false. sent9: there is something such that it is a kind of a Edwardian. sent10: the fact that the fact that the truant is a kind of a pipage and is not a hirsuteness is not true hold. sent11: that something is not precancerous or it vitriols Pachyrhizus or both does not hold if it is a flush. sent12: if the truant is a hirsuteness the fact that it is not subhuman and not a statesman is not true. sent13: if that something is not precancerous or does vitriol Pachyrhizus or both is incorrect then it does not redirect Rhus. sent14: the implantation is effervescent and it vitriols basswood. sent15: if that something does purport but it is not a kind of a statesman does not hold it is a kind of a flush. sent16: if there exists something such that it is precancerous the tailback does vitriol Pachyrhizus. sent17: the Haitian redirects implantation and is phylogenetic. sent18: if there exists something such that the fact that it is precancerous hold the tailback vitriols Pachyrhizus and it redirects Rhus. sent19: something is precancerous. sent20: if there is something such that that it is a steenbok is not wrong then the tailback is a commonage that does redirect Rhus. sent21: that the wheatgrass vitriols Pachyrhizus is right. sent22: if the fact that the truant is a pipage and is not a hirsuteness does not hold then it is a kind of a hirsuteness. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent18 -> int1: the tailback vitriols Pachyrhizus and does redirect Rhus.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__