the fact that the cycle happens but the confutation does not occur is not right.
sent1: if the agape does not occur the fact that the cycle and the confutation occurs does not hold. sent2: the scenicness does not occur. sent3: the confutation does not occur if the fact that the meatiness and the confutation occurs is not true. sent4: the lick does not occur. sent5: the vacationing does not occur. sent6: the vibrato is triggered by that the meatiness does not occur and/or the rerunning foible happens. sent7: both the trekking and the depersonalizing happens if the racketeering does not occur. sent8: if the meatiness occurs then that the vacation and the wariness happens does not hold. sent9: the fact that the racing occurs hold. sent10: that the depersonalizing does not occur brings about that the race happens and the recitation occurs. sent11: the fact that the rerunning foible occurs and the racing does not occur is wrong if the depersonalizing happens. sent12: if the rerunning foible does not occur that the meatiness and the confutation happens is wrong. sent13: the vacation does not occur if the fossorialness occurs. sent14: that the licking does not occur and the syllogizing happens leads to that the stomp does not occur. sent15: if the depersonalizing does not occur then the racing happens. sent16: if the vibrato occurs and the recitation occurs then the agape does not occur. sent17: the fact that that the cycle occurs and the confutation occurs is incorrect is right. sent18: the making happens. sent19: both the cycling and the vibrato happens if the recitation does not occur. sent20: the rerunning foible does not occur if that the rerunning foible but not the race happens is false. sent21: the depersonalizing does not occur but the trek occurs. sent22: not the vacationing but the wariness occurs if the fossorialness occurs. sent23: the trekking happens. sent24: the fact that the agape does not occur and the fossorialness does not occur is false if the stomp does not occur. sent25: that not the vacationing but the wariness happens is not true if the meatiness happens. sent26: the fossorialness occurs. sent27: the licking does not occur and the syllogizing occurs if the scenicness does not occur. sent28: that the cycling happens but the confutation does not occur is incorrect if the agape does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meatiness happens.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: that not the vacationing but the wariness occurs is false.; sent22 & sent26 -> int2: the vacation does not occur and the wariness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the meatiness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the meatiness does not occur or the rerunning foible occurs or both.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the vibrato occurs.; sent21 -> int7: the fact that the depersonalizing does not occur is correct.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: both the racing and the recitation happens.; int8 -> int9: the recitation occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the vibrato occurs and the recitation happens.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the agape does not occur.; int11 & sent28 -> hypothesis;
the cycle happens but the confutation does not occur.
sent27 & sent2 -> int12: the licking does not occur and the syllogizing occurs.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the stomping does not occur.; sent24 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the agape does not occur and the fossorialness does not occur is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cycle happens but the confutation does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the agape does not occur the fact that the cycle and the confutation occurs does not hold. sent2: the scenicness does not occur. sent3: the confutation does not occur if the fact that the meatiness and the confutation occurs is not true. sent4: the lick does not occur. sent5: the vacationing does not occur. sent6: the vibrato is triggered by that the meatiness does not occur and/or the rerunning foible happens. sent7: both the trekking and the depersonalizing happens if the racketeering does not occur. sent8: if the meatiness occurs then that the vacation and the wariness happens does not hold. sent9: the fact that the racing occurs hold. sent10: that the depersonalizing does not occur brings about that the race happens and the recitation occurs. sent11: the fact that the rerunning foible occurs and the racing does not occur is wrong if the depersonalizing happens. sent12: if the rerunning foible does not occur that the meatiness and the confutation happens is wrong. sent13: the vacation does not occur if the fossorialness occurs. sent14: that the licking does not occur and the syllogizing happens leads to that the stomp does not occur. sent15: if the depersonalizing does not occur then the racing happens. sent16: if the vibrato occurs and the recitation occurs then the agape does not occur. sent17: the fact that that the cycle occurs and the confutation occurs is incorrect is right. sent18: the making happens. sent19: both the cycling and the vibrato happens if the recitation does not occur. sent20: the rerunning foible does not occur if that the rerunning foible but not the race happens is false. sent21: the depersonalizing does not occur but the trek occurs. sent22: not the vacationing but the wariness occurs if the fossorialness occurs. sent23: the trekking happens. sent24: the fact that the agape does not occur and the fossorialness does not occur is false if the stomp does not occur. sent25: that not the vacationing but the wariness happens is not true if the meatiness happens. sent26: the fossorialness occurs. sent27: the licking does not occur and the syllogizing occurs if the scenicness does not occur. sent28: that the cycling happens but the confutation does not occur is incorrect if the agape does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the meatiness happens.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: that not the vacationing but the wariness occurs is false.; sent22 & sent26 -> int2: the vacation does not occur and the wariness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the meatiness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the meatiness does not occur or the rerunning foible occurs or both.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the vibrato occurs.; sent21 -> int7: the fact that the depersonalizing does not occur is correct.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: both the racing and the recitation happens.; int8 -> int9: the recitation occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the vibrato occurs and the recitation happens.; int10 & sent16 -> int11: the agape does not occur.; int11 & sent28 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__