there exists something such that if it is psychogenic that it is not a dongle and it is ungual is incorrect.
sent1: there is something such that if it is an addition that it is meaningless thing that is a trade is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it metamorphoses then it is not a nibbed and it is an unpredictability. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Brahman it is not taxonomic and it does metamorphose. sent4: the fact that something is not a dongle but it is ungual is not true if that it is non-psychogenic is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is a causalgia the fact that it is not unenthusiastic and is a kind of a prudence is incorrect. sent6: if the process is psychogenic then the fact that it is a dongle and ungual is not right. sent7: the fact that if the bittercress is the colonoscope that the bittercress is not a kind of a dongle and is a kind of an unpredictability does not hold is not incorrect. sent8: if something levels Henson the fact that it is not a tolazamide and it is inequitable does not hold. sent9: if the process is a kind of a cell then the fact that the fact that it is not meaningless and levels roadman is not false is not right.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the process is not a kind of a dongle but it is ungual is not correct if it is psychogenic.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is psychogenic that it is not a dongle and it is ungual is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is an addition that it is meaningless thing that is a trade is not correct. sent2: there is something such that if it metamorphoses then it is not a nibbed and it is an unpredictability. sent3: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Brahman it is not taxonomic and it does metamorphose. sent4: the fact that something is not a dongle but it is ungual is not true if that it is non-psychogenic is not correct. sent5: there is something such that if it is a causalgia the fact that it is not unenthusiastic and is a kind of a prudence is incorrect. sent6: if the process is psychogenic then the fact that it is a dongle and ungual is not right. sent7: the fact that if the bittercress is the colonoscope that the bittercress is not a kind of a dongle and is a kind of an unpredictability does not hold is not incorrect. sent8: if something levels Henson the fact that it is not a tolazamide and it is inequitable does not hold. sent9: if the process is a kind of a cell then the fact that the fact that it is not meaningless and levels roadman is not false is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the process is not a kind of a dongle but it is ungual is not correct if it is psychogenic.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__