the probenecid is not a scuffle and is not vasomotor.
sent1: there is nothing such that it prices plasticizer and does not exclude Hamamelidanthum. sent2: if the langoustine is not a kind of a beard the probenecid is not vasomotor but it does mingle countersignature. sent3: that the probenecid is not a scuffle and not vasomotor does not hold if the langoustine does beard. sent4: if something does exclude Hamamelidanthum then it beards. sent5: the langoustine does not beard. sent6: something is not a kind of a scuffle if the fact that it prices plasticizer and it does not exclude Hamamelidanthum does not hold. sent7: if something does not price plasticizer then the fact that it scuffles and it does exclude Hamamelidanthum is false. sent8: the langoustine does not price plasticizer if that the probenecid either does exclude Gazella or does exclude processor or both is false.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the probenecid is not vasomotor but it mingles countersignature.; int1 -> int2: the probenecid is not vasomotor.; sent6 -> int3: the probenecid is not a scuffle if that it prices plasticizer and does not exclude Hamamelidanthum is not right.; sent1 -> int4: that the probenecid prices plasticizer and does not exclude Hamamelidanthum is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the probenecid is not a scuffle.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the slipcover does not beard.
sent7 -> int6: the fact that the langoustine does scuffle and it excludes Hamamelidanthum is false if it does not price plasticizer.;
$hypothesis$ = the probenecid is not a scuffle and is not vasomotor. ; $context$ = sent1: there is nothing such that it prices plasticizer and does not exclude Hamamelidanthum. sent2: if the langoustine is not a kind of a beard the probenecid is not vasomotor but it does mingle countersignature. sent3: that the probenecid is not a scuffle and not vasomotor does not hold if the langoustine does beard. sent4: if something does exclude Hamamelidanthum then it beards. sent5: the langoustine does not beard. sent6: something is not a kind of a scuffle if the fact that it prices plasticizer and it does not exclude Hamamelidanthum does not hold. sent7: if something does not price plasticizer then the fact that it scuffles and it does exclude Hamamelidanthum is false. sent8: the langoustine does not price plasticizer if that the probenecid either does exclude Gazella or does exclude processor or both is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the probenecid is not vasomotor but it mingles countersignature.; int1 -> int2: the probenecid is not vasomotor.; sent6 -> int3: the probenecid is not a scuffle if that it prices plasticizer and does not exclude Hamamelidanthum is not right.; sent1 -> int4: that the probenecid prices plasticizer and does not exclude Hamamelidanthum is false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the probenecid is not a scuffle.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__