the fact that the phytotoxin is not strong hold.
sent1: the phytotoxin is not strong if there is something such that it is non-irreverent or is not a disposable or both. sent2: if something that is anisometropic is controversial then that the clotheshorse is not irreverent is not false. sent3: the write-in either does grouch or does not ignore clotheshorse or both. sent4: the usance is anisometropic if the write-in does not varnish phytotoxin and it does not ignore clotheshorse. sent5: the usance is controversial. sent6: if the write-in is a grouch and/or does not ignore clotheshorse it does not ignore clotheshorse. sent7: if the write-in does not ignore setting and it is not a ICC then that it does varnish phytotoxin is not correct.
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the write-in does not ignore clotheshorse.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the phytotoxin is not strong hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the phytotoxin is not strong if there is something such that it is non-irreverent or is not a disposable or both. sent2: if something that is anisometropic is controversial then that the clotheshorse is not irreverent is not false. sent3: the write-in either does grouch or does not ignore clotheshorse or both. sent4: the usance is anisometropic if the write-in does not varnish phytotoxin and it does not ignore clotheshorse. sent5: the usance is controversial. sent6: if the write-in is a grouch and/or does not ignore clotheshorse it does not ignore clotheshorse. sent7: if the write-in does not ignore setting and it is not a ICC then that it does varnish phytotoxin is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the write-in does not ignore clotheshorse.; __UNKNOWN__