the whittling does not occur.
sent1: the unequivocalness does not occur. sent2: the non-altitudinalness is caused by the equivocalness. sent3: if the fact that the blocking does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur does not hold then the altitudinalness occurs. sent4: that the liking occurs is prevented by that the block does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur. sent5: the whittling does not occur if the fact that the gin does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the blocking does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur is not right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the altitudinalness happens.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the altitudinalness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the blocking does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the likingness does not occur hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the whittling does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the unequivocalness does not occur. sent2: the non-altitudinalness is caused by the equivocalness. sent3: if the fact that the blocking does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur does not hold then the altitudinalness occurs. sent4: that the liking occurs is prevented by that the block does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur. sent5: the whittling does not occur if the fact that the gin does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the blocking does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur is not right.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the altitudinalness happens.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the altitudinalness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the blocking does not occur and the normalizing hackmatack does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the likingness does not occur hold.; __UNKNOWN__