that something is nonslippery and/or does article paroxetime does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the smoker is a kind of non-psychotherapeutic thing that is not a misnomer is not true then the spokeshave is not a Titanosauridae. sent2: if there is something such that that it is grassless and it is not nonslippery is wrong then the paroxetime does not article paroxetime. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is grassless and it is psychotherapeutic does not hold. sent4: the paroxetime is not psychotherapeutic if there exists something such that the fact that it is not psychotherapeutic is not wrong. sent5: the paroxetime is psychotherapeutic if the smoker is not a Karakoram and not chronological. sent6: if the oscillation is sectorial it is nonechoic. sent7: the paroxetime is not psychotherapeutic if there exists something such that the fact that it is grassless and it is psychotherapeutic is not correct. sent8: the oscillation is not unshockable if the fact that it articles paroxetime hold. sent9: the folio is sectorial if it is a kind of a Alexandrian and it is not a Gadidae. sent10: if the smoker is a misnomer it is not a kind of a Karakoram and it is not chronological. sent11: if there is something such that it does not article paroxetime that the smoker is a kind of non-psychotherapeutic thing that is not a misnomer is false. sent12: if the oscillation is not chronological then the smoker is either a Karakoram or nonslippery or both. sent13: the oscillation is not a kind of a misnomer and it does not article paroxetime. sent14: if the folio is sectorial the fact that the oscillation is sectorial is true. sent15: the paroxetime is psychotherapeutic if the smoker is a Karakoram but it is not chronological. sent16: the smoker is not nonslippery. sent17: that if something laces Barany then the fact that it is grassless and slippery is wrong is right. sent18: there is something such that it is grassless thing that is psychotherapeutic. sent19: if the fact that the smoker is not a kind of a misnomer is not incorrect then the oscillation either is nonslippery or does article paroxetime or both. sent20: something laces Barany but it does not fix folio if it is nonechoic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smoker is a kind of a misnomer.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the smoker is both not a Karakoram and not chronological.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the paroxetime is psychotherapeutic.; sent3 & sent7 -> int3: the paroxetime is not psychotherapeutic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the smoker is not a kind of a misnomer.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the oscillation is nonslippery or articles paroxetime or both.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the spokeshave is not a Titanosauridae.
sent17 -> int7: if the oscillation laces Barany then that it is grassless thing that is not nonslippery is incorrect.; sent20 -> int8: if the oscillation is nonechoic it laces Barany and it does not fix folio.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is nonslippery and/or does article paroxetime does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the smoker is a kind of non-psychotherapeutic thing that is not a misnomer is not true then the spokeshave is not a Titanosauridae. sent2: if there is something such that that it is grassless and it is not nonslippery is wrong then the paroxetime does not article paroxetime. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it is grassless and it is psychotherapeutic does not hold. sent4: the paroxetime is not psychotherapeutic if there exists something such that the fact that it is not psychotherapeutic is not wrong. sent5: the paroxetime is psychotherapeutic if the smoker is not a Karakoram and not chronological. sent6: if the oscillation is sectorial it is nonechoic. sent7: the paroxetime is not psychotherapeutic if there exists something such that the fact that it is grassless and it is psychotherapeutic is not correct. sent8: the oscillation is not unshockable if the fact that it articles paroxetime hold. sent9: the folio is sectorial if it is a kind of a Alexandrian and it is not a Gadidae. sent10: if the smoker is a misnomer it is not a kind of a Karakoram and it is not chronological. sent11: if there is something such that it does not article paroxetime that the smoker is a kind of non-psychotherapeutic thing that is not a misnomer is false. sent12: if the oscillation is not chronological then the smoker is either a Karakoram or nonslippery or both. sent13: the oscillation is not a kind of a misnomer and it does not article paroxetime. sent14: if the folio is sectorial the fact that the oscillation is sectorial is true. sent15: the paroxetime is psychotherapeutic if the smoker is a Karakoram but it is not chronological. sent16: the smoker is not nonslippery. sent17: that if something laces Barany then the fact that it is grassless and slippery is wrong is right. sent18: there is something such that it is grassless thing that is psychotherapeutic. sent19: if the fact that the smoker is not a kind of a misnomer is not incorrect then the oscillation either is nonslippery or does article paroxetime or both. sent20: something laces Barany but it does not fix folio if it is nonechoic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smoker is a kind of a misnomer.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the smoker is both not a Karakoram and not chronological.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the paroxetime is psychotherapeutic.; sent3 & sent7 -> int3: the paroxetime is not psychotherapeutic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the smoker is not a kind of a misnomer.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the oscillation is nonslippery or articles paroxetime or both.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__