the sac is a joint.
sent1: The cost does extricate morceau. sent2: if something is not immunotherapeutic it is not joint. sent3: if the sac does not joint then the fact that that the morceau is immunotherapeutic and does not extricate cost is incorrect is correct. sent4: if something that does not extricate contumacy does not roughen Cotacachi the morceau is not a Euphractus. sent5: if there is something such that it is immunotherapeutic then the sac joints. sent6: something is a Kazakhstani that roughens marsupium. sent7: the morceau is a fountainhead if the fact that the sac is immunotherapeutic is not incorrect. sent8: the morceau does extricate cost and/or it is Kiplingesque. sent9: if something is immunotherapeutic and/or it does extricate cost that the sac does joint is correct. sent10: if the methane is not avionic then it does not extricate contumacy and does not roughen Cotacachi. sent11: if that something is immunotherapeutic but it does not extricate cost is incorrect it solves. sent12: something is not immunotherapeutic if the fact that it does not extricate cost and does extricate pseudohermaphrodite is not false. sent13: if the morceau is not a Euphractus it is non-truthful thing that is a begonia. sent14: the methane is not avionic if something is a Kazakhstani and it does roughen marsupium.
something either does solve or is vesicular or both.
sent11 -> int1: the morceau does solve if that it is immunotherapeutic thing that does not extricate cost is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the sac is a joint. ; $context$ = sent1: The cost does extricate morceau. sent2: if something is not immunotherapeutic it is not joint. sent3: if the sac does not joint then the fact that that the morceau is immunotherapeutic and does not extricate cost is incorrect is correct. sent4: if something that does not extricate contumacy does not roughen Cotacachi the morceau is not a Euphractus. sent5: if there is something such that it is immunotherapeutic then the sac joints. sent6: something is a Kazakhstani that roughens marsupium. sent7: the morceau is a fountainhead if the fact that the sac is immunotherapeutic is not incorrect. sent8: the morceau does extricate cost and/or it is Kiplingesque. sent9: if something is immunotherapeutic and/or it does extricate cost that the sac does joint is correct. sent10: if the methane is not avionic then it does not extricate contumacy and does not roughen Cotacachi. sent11: if that something is immunotherapeutic but it does not extricate cost is incorrect it solves. sent12: something is not immunotherapeutic if the fact that it does not extricate cost and does extricate pseudohermaphrodite is not false. sent13: if the morceau is not a Euphractus it is non-truthful thing that is a begonia. sent14: the methane is not avionic if something is a Kazakhstani and it does roughen marsupium. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__