the tamoxifen is pemphigous.
sent1: something is pemphigous if it is a dumpcart. sent2: that the HIV is not a rhodochrosite hold. sent3: if the tamoxifen is not a dumpcart then the fact that the HIV does mystify curie or is not immiscible or both is wrong. sent4: that something is a dumpcart that is not a bacchant is not correct if it is a kind of a Zimbabwe. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Zimbabwe but it is rigid is wrong it is a kind of a bacchant. sent6: if the HIV is not a kind of a rhodochrosite then that it is not a Zimbabwe and is rigid does not hold. sent7: if that something is a kind of a dumpcart but it is not a bacchant is false then it is not pemphigous. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Zimbabwe and it is not a bacchant is wrong it is a Zimbabwe. sent9: something is not a bacchant if the fact that it mystifies curie and/or is not immiscible is incorrect. sent10: there is something such that it is a spitball. sent11: if the HIV does not mystify curie the fact that the tamoxifen is immiscible and/or is not a kind of a bacchant is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tamoxifen is not a dumpcart.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the HIV mystifies curie and/or is not immiscible is incorrect.; sent9 -> int2: the HIV is not a bacchant if that it mystifies curie or is not immiscible or both is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the HIV is not a bacchant.; sent5 -> int4: that if that the HIV is not the Zimbabwe and is rigid is incorrect the HIV is a bacchant is not wrong.; sent6 & sent2 -> int5: that the HIV is not a Zimbabwe but it is rigid is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the HIV is a bacchant.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the tamoxifen is a dumpcart.; sent1 -> int9: if that the tamoxifen is not a dumpcart is incorrect it is pemphigous.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the ruminant is a kind of a Zimbabwe.
sent8 -> int10: the ruminant is a Zimbabwe if the fact that it is not a Zimbabwe and it is not a bacchant is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the tamoxifen is pemphigous. ; $context$ = sent1: something is pemphigous if it is a dumpcart. sent2: that the HIV is not a rhodochrosite hold. sent3: if the tamoxifen is not a dumpcart then the fact that the HIV does mystify curie or is not immiscible or both is wrong. sent4: that something is a dumpcart that is not a bacchant is not correct if it is a kind of a Zimbabwe. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Zimbabwe but it is rigid is wrong it is a kind of a bacchant. sent6: if the HIV is not a kind of a rhodochrosite then that it is not a Zimbabwe and is rigid does not hold. sent7: if that something is a kind of a dumpcart but it is not a bacchant is false then it is not pemphigous. sent8: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Zimbabwe and it is not a bacchant is wrong it is a Zimbabwe. sent9: something is not a bacchant if the fact that it mystifies curie and/or is not immiscible is incorrect. sent10: there is something such that it is a spitball. sent11: if the HIV does not mystify curie the fact that the tamoxifen is immiscible and/or is not a kind of a bacchant is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tamoxifen is not a dumpcart.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the HIV mystifies curie and/or is not immiscible is incorrect.; sent9 -> int2: the HIV is not a bacchant if that it mystifies curie or is not immiscible or both is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the HIV is not a bacchant.; sent5 -> int4: that if that the HIV is not the Zimbabwe and is rigid is incorrect the HIV is a bacchant is not wrong.; sent6 & sent2 -> int5: that the HIV is not a Zimbabwe but it is rigid is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the HIV is a bacchant.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the tamoxifen is a dumpcart.; sent1 -> int9: if that the tamoxifen is not a dumpcart is incorrect it is pemphigous.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__