the photojournalism warms buffoonery.
sent1: the photojournalism is viscometric. sent2: the fact that something is not viscometric and it does not skitter does not hold if it is not a formal. sent3: if that the recorder is single-lane is not false then the photojournalism is not non-viscometric. sent4: if something is not a pitfall it is not a kind of a genealogist. sent5: the defroster warms buffoonery. sent6: if something is inauspicious then it is a kind of a Chlamydera. sent7: the fact that the jellyleaf is both a pitfall and not a polls is incorrect if it is not a kind of an audiovisual. sent8: something is viscometric if it warms buffoonery. sent9: the defroster is a ticking. sent10: the recorder is single-lane but it does not drink switcher if the jellyleaf is not a kind of a genealogist. sent11: that the defroster skitters is not wrong. sent12: the jellyleaf is an outing. sent13: the recorder is viscometric if the defroster does skitter. sent14: if the jellyleaf is a kind of a formal the photojournalism is single-lane. sent15: if something is single-lane it does warm buffoonery. sent16: if the fact that the jellyleaf is a pitfall but not a polls is not right it is not a pitfall. sent17: the defroster is informal if something that is single-lane does not drink switcher. sent18: the photojournalism is a hyssop. sent19: that the jellyleaf is formal is true if the fact that the recorder is viscometric is right.
sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the recorder is viscometric.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the jellyleaf is a formal.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the photojournalism is single-lane.; sent15 -> int4: if the photojournalism is single-lane then it warms buffoonery.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the photojournalism does not warm buffoonery.
sent2 -> int5: the fact that the defroster is not viscometric and it does not skitter is incorrect if it is not formal.; sent4 -> int6: if the fact that the jellyleaf is not a kind of a pitfall is true then it is not a kind of a genealogist.;
$hypothesis$ = the photojournalism warms buffoonery. ; $context$ = sent1: the photojournalism is viscometric. sent2: the fact that something is not viscometric and it does not skitter does not hold if it is not a formal. sent3: if that the recorder is single-lane is not false then the photojournalism is not non-viscometric. sent4: if something is not a pitfall it is not a kind of a genealogist. sent5: the defroster warms buffoonery. sent6: if something is inauspicious then it is a kind of a Chlamydera. sent7: the fact that the jellyleaf is both a pitfall and not a polls is incorrect if it is not a kind of an audiovisual. sent8: something is viscometric if it warms buffoonery. sent9: the defroster is a ticking. sent10: the recorder is single-lane but it does not drink switcher if the jellyleaf is not a kind of a genealogist. sent11: that the defroster skitters is not wrong. sent12: the jellyleaf is an outing. sent13: the recorder is viscometric if the defroster does skitter. sent14: if the jellyleaf is a kind of a formal the photojournalism is single-lane. sent15: if something is single-lane it does warm buffoonery. sent16: if the fact that the jellyleaf is a pitfall but not a polls is not right it is not a pitfall. sent17: the defroster is informal if something that is single-lane does not drink switcher. sent18: the photojournalism is a hyssop. sent19: that the jellyleaf is formal is true if the fact that the recorder is viscometric is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent11 -> int1: the recorder is viscometric.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the jellyleaf is a formal.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the photojournalism is single-lane.; sent15 -> int4: if the photojournalism is single-lane then it warms buffoonery.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__