the animalization does not detail animalization.
sent1: if the fact that the Gladstone is not a bacchante hold then that the candlestick does not capsule workman hold. sent2: the animalization does not detail animalization if the broodmare is both obtrusive and a sourwood. sent3: if the candlestick is obtrusive and is not a sourwood the Gladstone is not quadraphonic. sent4: the reproducer is a clutter and/or it does not clangor icon if the Gladstone is a bacchante. sent5: the reproducer either is a kind of a clutter or does not clangor icon or both. sent6: the reproducer either is not a clutter or does not clangor icon or both if the Gladstone is a bacchante. sent7: the broodmare is a bacchante and is not obtrusive if the Gladstone is not a sourwood. sent8: the broodmare is obtrusive if the candlestick is quadraphonic thing that capsules workman. sent9: the candlestick does not capsule workman. sent10: if the Gladstone is not a bacchante the candlestick is not non-quadraphonic but it does not capsule workman. sent11: that that the reproducer does not clutter and/or does not clangor icon hold is not right. sent12: the broodmare is a kind of a sourwood. sent13: the Gladstone does not detail animalization and it is not a bacchante if the fact that the reproducer does not capsule workman is not false. sent14: if the Gladstone does not detail animalization and is not quadraphonic then that the animalization does detail animalization is not wrong. sent15: the broodmare is obtrusive if the candlestick is not non-quadraphonic and does not capsule workman. sent16: the Gladstone is quadraphonic. sent17: the reproducer is a clutter. sent18: if the fact that something is both a starlet and not a rise is incorrect it is not perinasal. sent19: if something is not perinasal then it is obtrusive and it is not a sourwood. sent20: the fact that that the surfeit does not capsule candlestick and is not an asterisk is not wrong does not hold. sent21: the broodmare is non-bimillenial. sent22: if the broodmare is a Clay then the fact that the candlestick is a starlet but it is not a rise is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gladstone is a bacchante.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reproducer is not a clutter or it does not clangor icon or both.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Gladstone is not a kind of a bacchante.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the candlestick is quadraphonic thing that does not capsule workman.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the broodmare is obtrusive.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the broodmare is obtrusive thing that is a sourwood.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the animalization details animalization is not wrong.
sent20 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it does not capsule candlestick and it is not an asterisk is not true.; sent19 -> int8: the candlestick is obtrusive and is not a sourwood if it is not perinasal.; sent18 -> int9: the candlestick is not perinasal if that it is both a starlet and not a rise is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the animalization does not detail animalization. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Gladstone is not a bacchante hold then that the candlestick does not capsule workman hold. sent2: the animalization does not detail animalization if the broodmare is both obtrusive and a sourwood. sent3: if the candlestick is obtrusive and is not a sourwood the Gladstone is not quadraphonic. sent4: the reproducer is a clutter and/or it does not clangor icon if the Gladstone is a bacchante. sent5: the reproducer either is a kind of a clutter or does not clangor icon or both. sent6: the reproducer either is not a clutter or does not clangor icon or both if the Gladstone is a bacchante. sent7: the broodmare is a bacchante and is not obtrusive if the Gladstone is not a sourwood. sent8: the broodmare is obtrusive if the candlestick is quadraphonic thing that capsules workman. sent9: the candlestick does not capsule workman. sent10: if the Gladstone is not a bacchante the candlestick is not non-quadraphonic but it does not capsule workman. sent11: that that the reproducer does not clutter and/or does not clangor icon hold is not right. sent12: the broodmare is a kind of a sourwood. sent13: the Gladstone does not detail animalization and it is not a bacchante if the fact that the reproducer does not capsule workman is not false. sent14: if the Gladstone does not detail animalization and is not quadraphonic then that the animalization does detail animalization is not wrong. sent15: the broodmare is obtrusive if the candlestick is not non-quadraphonic and does not capsule workman. sent16: the Gladstone is quadraphonic. sent17: the reproducer is a clutter. sent18: if the fact that something is both a starlet and not a rise is incorrect it is not perinasal. sent19: if something is not perinasal then it is obtrusive and it is not a sourwood. sent20: the fact that that the surfeit does not capsule candlestick and is not an asterisk is not wrong does not hold. sent21: the broodmare is non-bimillenial. sent22: if the broodmare is a Clay then the fact that the candlestick is a starlet but it is not a rise is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Gladstone is a bacchante.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the reproducer is not a clutter or it does not clangor icon or both.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Gladstone is not a kind of a bacchante.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the candlestick is quadraphonic thing that does not capsule workman.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: the broodmare is obtrusive.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the broodmare is obtrusive thing that is a sourwood.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__