the decolonizing ravaging does not occur if the paradigmaticness occurs.
sent1: the scramming hyponatremia is triggered by that the riding happens. sent2: if the decolonizing ravaging and the paradigmaticness happens then the scramming hyponatremia does not occur. sent3: the decolonizing ravaging occurs if the paradigmaticness occurs. sent4: the decolonizing glop happens. sent5: the atheroscleroticness does not occur if the seeking occurs. sent6: the overriding does not occur. sent7: the billiardsness occurs if the biblioticsness happens. sent8: the voicing does not occur. sent9: the decolonizing apparel happens and the ducking happens. sent10: the decolonizing breadstick happens if that the rearmament happens is not wrong. sent11: that the unwrittenness does not occur is caused by that the nonrepetitiveness occurs. sent12: the outsailing wire occurs.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decolonizing ravaging occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paradigmaticness occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the decolonizing ravaging and the paradigmaticness happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the scramming hyponatremia does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the decolonizing ravaging does not occur if the paradigmaticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the scramming hyponatremia is triggered by that the riding happens. sent2: if the decolonizing ravaging and the paradigmaticness happens then the scramming hyponatremia does not occur. sent3: the decolonizing ravaging occurs if the paradigmaticness occurs. sent4: the decolonizing glop happens. sent5: the atheroscleroticness does not occur if the seeking occurs. sent6: the overriding does not occur. sent7: the billiardsness occurs if the biblioticsness happens. sent8: the voicing does not occur. sent9: the decolonizing apparel happens and the ducking happens. sent10: the decolonizing breadstick happens if that the rearmament happens is not wrong. sent11: that the unwrittenness does not occur is caused by that the nonrepetitiveness occurs. sent12: the outsailing wire occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decolonizing ravaging occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paradigmaticness occurs.; assump2 & assump1 -> int1: the decolonizing ravaging and the paradigmaticness happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the scramming hyponatremia does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__