the Fergon is not a ideation.
sent1: the agnate is not disintegrative or it does outgrow Muybridge or both. sent2: that the tocsin is both not non-aperiodic and not inedible does not hold. sent3: the fact that the Fergon is not a ideation is right if the fact that the tocsin is not non-aperiodic and is not edible is incorrect. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not disintegrative and/or it does outgrow Muybridge the Bromo-seltzer is not aperiodic. sent5: something is either not philharmonic or not non-disintegrative or both if it outgrows Muybridge. sent6: the fact that the hypertonicity is not edible but it is philharmonic is incorrect if the Bromo-seltzer is not aperiodic. sent7: if that the Malto is an affluent and is not a nonstarter is not right then it does outgrow Muybridge. sent8: something is percussive if it is either not philharmonic or not disintegrative or both. sent9: the Sharpie is edible if there is something such that the fact that it is not edible and not non-philharmonic is wrong. sent10: if the Malto does toss attentiveness the diocesan toss attentiveness. sent11: if the diocesan tosses accuracy and is a postdiluvian the Malto is not percussive. sent12: the Fergon is not a kind of a ideation if that the tocsin is edible is not false. sent13: something either is not philharmonic or is not disintegrative or both if it does outgrow Muybridge. sent14: the fact that the tocsin is non-percussive but it is a postdiluvian is false if the Sharpie is edible. sent15: the Malto is not philharmonic or not non-disintegrative or both if it does outgrow Muybridge. sent16: if the fact that the diocesan is not a postdiluvian is not false then that the tocsin is aperiodic and is not edible is not true. sent17: the Malto is philharmonic and/or not disintegrative. sent18: the Fergon is a ideation if the fact that the diocesan does not toss accuracy or it is a ideation or both is not right. sent19: that the Malto is a kind of an affluent but it is not a nonstarter is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diocesan is postdiluvian.; sent8 -> int1: the Malto is percussive if either it is not philharmonic or it is not disintegrative or both.; sent13 -> int2: the Malto is not philharmonic or is not disintegrative or both if it outgrows Muybridge.; sent7 & sent19 -> int3: the Malto does outgrow Muybridge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Malto is not philharmonic and/or it is not disintegrative.; int1 & int4 -> int5: the Malto is percussive.;
the Fergon is a ideation.
sent1 -> int6: either something is not disintegrative or it does outgrow Muybridge or both.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Bromo-seltzer is not aperiodic.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the hypertonicity is both not edible and philharmonic is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is not edible and it is philharmonic is false.; int9 & sent9 -> int10: the Sharpie is not inedible.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: that the tocsin is not percussive but it is a postdiluvian is incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that that it is not percussive and it is a postdiluvian is correct is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the Fergon is not a ideation. ; $context$ = sent1: the agnate is not disintegrative or it does outgrow Muybridge or both. sent2: that the tocsin is both not non-aperiodic and not inedible does not hold. sent3: the fact that the Fergon is not a ideation is right if the fact that the tocsin is not non-aperiodic and is not edible is incorrect. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not disintegrative and/or it does outgrow Muybridge the Bromo-seltzer is not aperiodic. sent5: something is either not philharmonic or not non-disintegrative or both if it outgrows Muybridge. sent6: the fact that the hypertonicity is not edible but it is philharmonic is incorrect if the Bromo-seltzer is not aperiodic. sent7: if that the Malto is an affluent and is not a nonstarter is not right then it does outgrow Muybridge. sent8: something is percussive if it is either not philharmonic or not disintegrative or both. sent9: the Sharpie is edible if there is something such that the fact that it is not edible and not non-philharmonic is wrong. sent10: if the Malto does toss attentiveness the diocesan toss attentiveness. sent11: if the diocesan tosses accuracy and is a postdiluvian the Malto is not percussive. sent12: the Fergon is not a kind of a ideation if that the tocsin is edible is not false. sent13: something either is not philharmonic or is not disintegrative or both if it does outgrow Muybridge. sent14: the fact that the tocsin is non-percussive but it is a postdiluvian is false if the Sharpie is edible. sent15: the Malto is not philharmonic or not non-disintegrative or both if it does outgrow Muybridge. sent16: if the fact that the diocesan is not a postdiluvian is not false then that the tocsin is aperiodic and is not edible is not true. sent17: the Malto is philharmonic and/or not disintegrative. sent18: the Fergon is a ideation if the fact that the diocesan does not toss accuracy or it is a ideation or both is not right. sent19: that the Malto is a kind of an affluent but it is not a nonstarter is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diocesan is postdiluvian.; sent8 -> int1: the Malto is percussive if either it is not philharmonic or it is not disintegrative or both.; sent13 -> int2: the Malto is not philharmonic or is not disintegrative or both if it outgrows Muybridge.; sent7 & sent19 -> int3: the Malto does outgrow Muybridge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Malto is not philharmonic and/or it is not disintegrative.; int1 & int4 -> int5: the Malto is percussive.; __UNKNOWN__