there exists something such that if that either it is not linguistics or it does enjoy muleteer or both is false it does enjoy LLB.
sent1: if that the fact that the radiotelephone is not a Plimsoll and/or it snuffles hurrah is right is not right it does piffle. sent2: something is a aide-memoire if it does not evaporate and/or is benzylic. sent3: if that the forte is linguistics and/or it enjoys muleteer is incorrect then it enjoys LLB. sent4: there exists something such that if that either it is not linguistics or it enjoys muleteer or both is not incorrect it does enjoy LLB. sent5: if the fact that something is not linguistics and/or it enjoys muleteer is incorrect then it enjoys LLB. sent6: something enjoys LLB if that it is not linguistics and/or it enjoys muleteer is right. sent7: the forte is Linnaean if it is not a reference and/or it is a presentness. sent8: the forte enjoys muleteer if that either it is a tod or it is jugular or both is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that the fact that it enjoys orthoscope or is anemic or both is not incorrect is wrong then it enjoys directorate. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is linguistics or enjoys muleteer or both is incorrect then it enjoys LLB. sent11: the fact that the forte is conventional hold if the fact that it does not enjoy LLB and/or it does spring is false. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a countermand or it is cheap or both it is a kind of a Aalto. sent13: the forte does enjoy LLB if it is non-linguistics and/or does enjoy muleteer. sent14: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is either a semicentennial or annelid or both does not hold then it does disgust is not incorrect. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that either it is not arbitrary or it is antecubital or both is incorrect then the fact that it beats remover is not wrong. sent16: if that something either is linguistics or enjoys muleteer or both is not correct that it does enjoy LLB is true.
sent5 -> int1: if the fact that the forte is not linguistics and/or it does enjoy muleteer is not right then it enjoys LLB.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that either it is not linguistics or it does enjoy muleteer or both is false it does enjoy LLB. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the fact that the radiotelephone is not a Plimsoll and/or it snuffles hurrah is right is not right it does piffle. sent2: something is a aide-memoire if it does not evaporate and/or is benzylic. sent3: if that the forte is linguistics and/or it enjoys muleteer is incorrect then it enjoys LLB. sent4: there exists something such that if that either it is not linguistics or it enjoys muleteer or both is not incorrect it does enjoy LLB. sent5: if the fact that something is not linguistics and/or it enjoys muleteer is incorrect then it enjoys LLB. sent6: something enjoys LLB if that it is not linguistics and/or it enjoys muleteer is right. sent7: the forte is Linnaean if it is not a reference and/or it is a presentness. sent8: the forte enjoys muleteer if that either it is a tod or it is jugular or both is incorrect. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that the fact that it enjoys orthoscope or is anemic or both is not incorrect is wrong then it enjoys directorate. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it is linguistics or enjoys muleteer or both is incorrect then it enjoys LLB. sent11: the fact that the forte is conventional hold if the fact that it does not enjoy LLB and/or it does spring is false. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a countermand or it is cheap or both it is a kind of a Aalto. sent13: the forte does enjoy LLB if it is non-linguistics and/or does enjoy muleteer. sent14: the fact that there exists something such that if that it is either a semicentennial or annelid or both does not hold then it does disgust is not incorrect. sent15: there exists something such that if the fact that either it is not arbitrary or it is antecubital or both is incorrect then the fact that it beats remover is not wrong. sent16: if that something either is linguistics or enjoys muleteer or both is not correct that it does enjoy LLB is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the fact that the forte is not linguistics and/or it does enjoy muleteer is not right then it enjoys LLB.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__