the fact that the tonsure rights Lubumbashi and is a foster-son is incorrect.
sent1: the stylist is an initiate and does concoct. sent2: the stylist patronizes monarch. sent3: the brokerage does initiate. sent4: if the spore is elysian the brokerage is a Gongorism. sent5: if something is an initiate then it is elysian. sent6: the stylist is not an aura. sent7: the augur is elysian. sent8: if the grinner does snuff tonsure it is sarcastic. sent9: that the tonsure is unemployable is correct. sent10: the glutamine is a foster-son if it is a tactics. sent11: that there is something such that it is a kind of a bungee hold. sent12: the stylist does concoct. sent13: if something is a kind of a Gongorism that it is not a kind of a coffeeberry and it does not snuff tonsure does not hold. sent14: the stylist is useful. sent15: the flicker is not a kind of a casework. sent16: the tonsure is a kind of a foster-son if it is an initiate. sent17: there exists something such that it does concoct. sent18: the tonsure initiates if that the flicker is not a casework but it does initiates is not wrong. sent19: the fact that the tonsure rights Lubumbashi and is a foster-son does not hold if the stylist is not a coffeeberry. sent20: the tonsure rights Lubumbashi if the fact that the brokerage is not a kind of a coffeeberry and it does not snuff tonsure is not true. sent21: the tonsure is not elysian. sent22: something is a kind of a Gongorism if it does snuff tonsure. sent23: the stylist is not elysian if it is a Gongorism and it is a coffeeberry.
sent22 -> int1: the stylist is a Gongorism if the fact that it snuffs tonsure is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stylist is a coffeeberry.; sent5 -> int2: if the stylist initiates it is elysian.; sent1 -> int3: that the stylist is an initiate is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the stylist is not non-elysian.;
the tonsure does right Lubumbashi and it is a foster-son.
sent13 -> int5: if the brokerage is a Gongorism that it is not a coffeeberry and does not snuff tonsure is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tonsure rights Lubumbashi and is a foster-son is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the stylist is an initiate and does concoct. sent2: the stylist patronizes monarch. sent3: the brokerage does initiate. sent4: if the spore is elysian the brokerage is a Gongorism. sent5: if something is an initiate then it is elysian. sent6: the stylist is not an aura. sent7: the augur is elysian. sent8: if the grinner does snuff tonsure it is sarcastic. sent9: that the tonsure is unemployable is correct. sent10: the glutamine is a foster-son if it is a tactics. sent11: that there is something such that it is a kind of a bungee hold. sent12: the stylist does concoct. sent13: if something is a kind of a Gongorism that it is not a kind of a coffeeberry and it does not snuff tonsure does not hold. sent14: the stylist is useful. sent15: the flicker is not a kind of a casework. sent16: the tonsure is a kind of a foster-son if it is an initiate. sent17: there exists something such that it does concoct. sent18: the tonsure initiates if that the flicker is not a casework but it does initiates is not wrong. sent19: the fact that the tonsure rights Lubumbashi and is a foster-son does not hold if the stylist is not a coffeeberry. sent20: the tonsure rights Lubumbashi if the fact that the brokerage is not a kind of a coffeeberry and it does not snuff tonsure is not true. sent21: the tonsure is not elysian. sent22: something is a kind of a Gongorism if it does snuff tonsure. sent23: the stylist is not elysian if it is a Gongorism and it is a coffeeberry. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: the stylist is a Gongorism if the fact that it snuffs tonsure is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stylist is a coffeeberry.; sent5 -> int2: if the stylist initiates it is elysian.; sent1 -> int3: that the stylist is an initiate is not false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the stylist is not non-elysian.; __UNKNOWN__