the brodiaea is mutable.
sent1: if the fact that the dough is not a kind of a contrast or it is non-wilding or both is not true then the fact that the brodiaea is psychopharmacological is correct. sent2: the dough is psychopharmacological if that either the brodiaea is mutable or it is not wilding or both is false. sent3: the dough is not a simplicity. sent4: the dough is skinless if the son is a kind of a Herat. sent5: the dough is a wilding if it is not a kind of a simplicity. sent6: if that the dough is not adynamic but it is a kind of a Herat is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Herat. sent7: that something is psychopharmacological is not false if it is mutable. sent8: the dough is wilding. sent9: the bearskin is not adynamic. sent10: the fact that the fact that the dough either is not a contrast or is not a wilding or both is wrong is true if it is not a simplicity. sent11: if something is a kind of a simplicity it is isothermic. sent12: the fact that something is both a simplicity and immutable is false if it is not psychopharmacological. sent13: the fact that something is not a turned but isothermic is false if that it is skinless hold. sent14: if something does turn then it is mutable. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not adynamic the yardman either is not adynamic or is not a Herat or both. sent16: if the brodiaea is isothermic it is mutable. sent17: the brodiaea is psychopharmacological if that the dough does not contrast or is a kind of a wilding or both does not hold. sent18: the son is a Herat if that the yardman is not adynamic is not wrong. sent19: the epithelium does turn and it is skinless if the dough is not a kind of a Herat. sent20: if the brodiaea is psychopharmacological then that it is isothermic is not wrong. sent21: that the dough is not adynamic and is a Herat is incorrect.
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: that the dough does not contrast or it is not a kind of a wilding or both is wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the brodiaea is psychopharmacological.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the brodiaea is isothermic.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the epithelium is isothermic.
sent11 -> int4: if the epithelium is a simplicity then it is isothermic.; sent7 -> int5: if that the epithelium is mutable hold then it is psychopharmacological.; sent14 -> int6: if the epithelium turns it is mutable.; sent6 & sent21 -> int7: the dough is not a Herat.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the epithelium does turn and it is skinless.; int8 -> int9: the epithelium turns.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the epithelium is mutable.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the epithelium is psychopharmacological.;
$hypothesis$ = the brodiaea is mutable. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the dough is not a kind of a contrast or it is non-wilding or both is not true then the fact that the brodiaea is psychopharmacological is correct. sent2: the dough is psychopharmacological if that either the brodiaea is mutable or it is not wilding or both is false. sent3: the dough is not a simplicity. sent4: the dough is skinless if the son is a kind of a Herat. sent5: the dough is a wilding if it is not a kind of a simplicity. sent6: if that the dough is not adynamic but it is a kind of a Herat is incorrect then it is not a kind of a Herat. sent7: that something is psychopharmacological is not false if it is mutable. sent8: the dough is wilding. sent9: the bearskin is not adynamic. sent10: the fact that the fact that the dough either is not a contrast or is not a wilding or both is wrong is true if it is not a simplicity. sent11: if something is a kind of a simplicity it is isothermic. sent12: the fact that something is both a simplicity and immutable is false if it is not psychopharmacological. sent13: the fact that something is not a turned but isothermic is false if that it is skinless hold. sent14: if something does turn then it is mutable. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not adynamic the yardman either is not adynamic or is not a Herat or both. sent16: if the brodiaea is isothermic it is mutable. sent17: the brodiaea is psychopharmacological if that the dough does not contrast or is a kind of a wilding or both does not hold. sent18: the son is a Herat if that the yardman is not adynamic is not wrong. sent19: the epithelium does turn and it is skinless if the dough is not a kind of a Herat. sent20: if the brodiaea is psychopharmacological then that it is isothermic is not wrong. sent21: that the dough is not adynamic and is a Herat is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent3 -> int1: that the dough does not contrast or it is not a kind of a wilding or both is wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the brodiaea is psychopharmacological.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the brodiaea is isothermic.; int3 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__