the uphill is cytotoxic.
sent1: the visor is disposable thing that is a hindgut if the uphill is not cytotoxic. sent2: if the visor does not impel hygiene the uphill is not non-polymorphous but cytotoxic. sent3: the junket is polymorphous if that the visor is a hindgut is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the visor is not a lull and is a kind of a brigandine does not hold if it is not terminal. sent5: the uphill is not cytotoxic but it lulls if the methanogen is a lulls. sent6: something is not polymorphous if the fact that it is not a brigandine and it impels hygiene is not true. sent7: if the junket is polymorphous then the methanogen does not lull but it is polymorphous. sent8: that the methanogen is not a brigandine but it impels hygiene does not hold. sent9: that the visor is not a brigandine but it is a disposable does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uphill is not cytotoxic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the visor is a disposable and it is a kind of a hindgut.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the visor is a hindgut is right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the junket is polymorphous.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the methanogen is not a kind of a lull but it is polymorphous.; int4 -> int5: that the methanogen is polymorphous is correct.; sent6 -> int6: if the fact that the methanogen is not a brigandine and impels hygiene is wrong it is not polymorphous.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the methanogen is not polymorphous.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the sixth-former is not disposable.
$hypothesis$ = the uphill is cytotoxic. ; $context$ = sent1: the visor is disposable thing that is a hindgut if the uphill is not cytotoxic. sent2: if the visor does not impel hygiene the uphill is not non-polymorphous but cytotoxic. sent3: the junket is polymorphous if that the visor is a hindgut is not incorrect. sent4: the fact that the visor is not a lull and is a kind of a brigandine does not hold if it is not terminal. sent5: the uphill is not cytotoxic but it lulls if the methanogen is a lulls. sent6: something is not polymorphous if the fact that it is not a brigandine and it impels hygiene is not true. sent7: if the junket is polymorphous then the methanogen does not lull but it is polymorphous. sent8: that the methanogen is not a brigandine but it impels hygiene does not hold. sent9: that the visor is not a brigandine but it is a disposable does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the uphill is not cytotoxic.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the visor is a disposable and it is a kind of a hindgut.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the visor is a hindgut is right.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the junket is polymorphous.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the methanogen is not a kind of a lull but it is polymorphous.; int4 -> int5: that the methanogen is polymorphous is correct.; sent6 -> int6: if the fact that the methanogen is not a brigandine and impels hygiene is wrong it is not polymorphous.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the methanogen is not polymorphous.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__