the fact that the vanillin does not talc pail but it is a importunity is wrong if the homegirl is a rag.
sent1: the microsporangium does not talc chopstick if the homegirl is a rag and is diametric. sent2: that the microsporangium is impolitic is right if there is something such that it is a kind of a friendship. sent3: the homegirl is a importunity that does flicker Mansi if the microsporangium is not a Medan. sent4: the fact that something does rag and does talc chopstick is not right if it is not obligatory. sent5: if the microsporangium does not talc chopstick and is obligatory then the smoker does skin. sent6: if the homegirl does rag then the fact that the vanillin does talc pail and it is a importunity does not hold. sent7: that the vanillin does talc pail and is a importunity is not true. sent8: the homegirl is a kind of a skin that flickers Mansi. sent9: the homegirl flickers Mansi. sent10: the microsporangium is not a Medan if it is not diametric. sent11: the microsporangium is a kind of a misuse. sent12: if the homegirl does rag the vanillin does not talc pail and is a importunity. sent13: there is something such that it is a catechism. sent14: the vanillin does not talc pail and is a kind of a importunity. sent15: the microsporangium is urban. sent16: that the microsporangium is a importunity is not wrong. sent17: if that something talcs pail and it skins does not hold that it is not obligatory is not wrong. sent18: the homegirl does flicker Mansi and is a Medan. sent19: if that the smoker does skin hold the vanillin does not talc pail and is a kind of a importunity. sent20: something is a kind of a friendship. sent21: the vanillin talcs microsporangium and is a tarsier. sent22: the microsporangium is obligatory and is impolitic if there exists something such that it is a friendship. sent23: the microsporangium is impolitic. sent24: if the smoker does skin that the vanillin does not talc pail but it is a kind of a importunity is incorrect. sent25: the fact that the vanillin does talc pail and is a kind of a importunity is false if the smoker is a kind of a skin. sent26: the pail is a kind of a importunity if the homegirl is a importunity.
sent18 -> int1: the homegirl is a Medan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homegirl is a rag.; sent20 & sent22 -> int2: the microsporangium is obligatory and is impolitic.; int2 -> int3: the microsporangium is obligatory.;
the pail is a kind of a importunity.
sent4 -> int4: that the smoker is a rag and talcs chopstick does not hold if it is not obligatory.; sent17 -> int5: the smoker is not obligatory if that it talcs pail and does skin is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the vanillin does not talc pail but it is a importunity is wrong if the homegirl is a rag. ; $context$ = sent1: the microsporangium does not talc chopstick if the homegirl is a rag and is diametric. sent2: that the microsporangium is impolitic is right if there is something such that it is a kind of a friendship. sent3: the homegirl is a importunity that does flicker Mansi if the microsporangium is not a Medan. sent4: the fact that something does rag and does talc chopstick is not right if it is not obligatory. sent5: if the microsporangium does not talc chopstick and is obligatory then the smoker does skin. sent6: if the homegirl does rag then the fact that the vanillin does talc pail and it is a importunity does not hold. sent7: that the vanillin does talc pail and is a importunity is not true. sent8: the homegirl is a kind of a skin that flickers Mansi. sent9: the homegirl flickers Mansi. sent10: the microsporangium is not a Medan if it is not diametric. sent11: the microsporangium is a kind of a misuse. sent12: if the homegirl does rag the vanillin does not talc pail and is a importunity. sent13: there is something such that it is a catechism. sent14: the vanillin does not talc pail and is a kind of a importunity. sent15: the microsporangium is urban. sent16: that the microsporangium is a importunity is not wrong. sent17: if that something talcs pail and it skins does not hold that it is not obligatory is not wrong. sent18: the homegirl does flicker Mansi and is a Medan. sent19: if that the smoker does skin hold the vanillin does not talc pail and is a kind of a importunity. sent20: something is a kind of a friendship. sent21: the vanillin talcs microsporangium and is a tarsier. sent22: the microsporangium is obligatory and is impolitic if there exists something such that it is a friendship. sent23: the microsporangium is impolitic. sent24: if the smoker does skin that the vanillin does not talc pail but it is a kind of a importunity is incorrect. sent25: the fact that the vanillin does talc pail and is a kind of a importunity is false if the smoker is a kind of a skin. sent26: the pail is a kind of a importunity if the homegirl is a importunity. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the homegirl is a Medan.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homegirl is a rag.; sent20 & sent22 -> int2: the microsporangium is obligatory and is impolitic.; int2 -> int3: the microsporangium is obligatory.; __UNKNOWN__