that the sporophyll does not configure Churchill but it is synchronous is correct.
sent1: the fact that the antipyretic does disunify effacement is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is both not rosaceous and not a K is not true. sent2: the sporophyll does not configure Churchill but it is synchronous if that the BWR configures toxin hold. sent3: the fact that the monad is not pneumogastric and it does not configure antipyretic hold. sent4: if the monad is not pneumogastric the fact that the prothrombinase is not rosaceous and is not a K is wrong. sent5: the fact that the monad is not nontechnical and not a Hupa is not true if the prothrombinase is pneumogastric. sent6: if the antipyretic disunifies effacement then the BWR does configure toxin.
sent3 -> int1: the monad is not pneumogastric.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the prothrombinase is not rosaceous and not a K is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-rosaceous thing that is not a K does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the antipyretic disunifies effacement.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the BWR configures toxin.; sent2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that the fact that it is not nontechnical and is not a Hupa is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = that the sporophyll does not configure Churchill but it is synchronous is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the antipyretic does disunify effacement is not incorrect if there exists something such that that it is both not rosaceous and not a K is not true. sent2: the sporophyll does not configure Churchill but it is synchronous if that the BWR configures toxin hold. sent3: the fact that the monad is not pneumogastric and it does not configure antipyretic hold. sent4: if the monad is not pneumogastric the fact that the prothrombinase is not rosaceous and is not a K is wrong. sent5: the fact that the monad is not nontechnical and not a Hupa is not true if the prothrombinase is pneumogastric. sent6: if the antipyretic disunifies effacement then the BWR does configure toxin. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the monad is not pneumogastric.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the prothrombinase is not rosaceous and not a K is not correct.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is non-rosaceous thing that is not a K does not hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the antipyretic disunifies effacement.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the BWR configures toxin.; sent2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__