the fact that the fact that that the epicalyx is not a kind of a Maupassant but it cambers clinocephaly is not incorrect does not hold is correct.
sent1: if the bristlegrass does roll Call it is a gastrulation. sent2: if the bristlegrass is not a gastrulation it is polyphonic. sent3: if something is not a gastrulation that the rubber is not a nominalist but it is polyphonic is wrong. sent4: something is a high-rise and/or it is not viral if it is not polyphonic. sent5: the totality is a nominalist. sent6: there is something such that it is not a gastrulation. sent7: something is polyphonic if it does roll Call. sent8: the canal is not a nominalist and it is not polyphonic if the bristlegrass is polyphonic. sent9: the totality is not a high-rise if the canal is a nominalist but it is not polyphonic. sent10: if there exists something such that it is high-rise or is not viral or both then the canal is not viral. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a nominalist and is polyphonic does not hold the totality is not polyphonic. sent12: if the canal is not a kind of a nominalist and is not polyphonic the totality is not high-rise. sent13: the epicalyx is viral if that it is not a kind of a Maupassant and does camber clinocephaly is not right. sent14: if the bristlegrass is polyphonic the canal is not a nominalist. sent15: if the totality is a kind of a gastrulation it is high-rise. sent16: the totality is a kind of a gastrulation. sent17: the canal is polyphonic if it is a Maupassant. sent18: the bristlegrass does roll Call if the epicalyx is viral. sent19: the epicalyx is not a nominalist. sent20: the epicalyx cambers clinocephaly.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the epicalyx is not a Maupassant but it does camber clinocephaly does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the epicalyx is viral.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the bristlegrass rolls Call.; sent7 -> int3: if the bristlegrass does roll Call it is polyphonic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bristlegrass is polyphonic.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the canal is not a kind of a nominalist and is not polyphonic.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the totality is not a kind of a high-rise.; sent15 & sent16 -> int7: the totality is a high-rise.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
that the epicalyx is not a Maupassant and does camber clinocephaly is not correct.
sent4 -> int9: if that the totality is not polyphonic is not incorrect then it is a high-rise or it is not viral or both.; sent6 & sent3 -> int10: that the rubber is not a kind of a nominalist but it is polyphonic is not right.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that that it is not a nominalist and it is polyphonic is not wrong is not true.; int11 & sent11 -> int12: the totality is not polyphonic.; int9 & int12 -> int13: either the totality is a kind of a high-rise or it is not viral or both.; int13 -> int14: something is a high-rise and/or it is not viral.; int14 & sent10 -> int15: the canal is not viral.; int15 -> int16: something is not viral.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that that the epicalyx is not a kind of a Maupassant but it cambers clinocephaly is not incorrect does not hold is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bristlegrass does roll Call it is a gastrulation. sent2: if the bristlegrass is not a gastrulation it is polyphonic. sent3: if something is not a gastrulation that the rubber is not a nominalist but it is polyphonic is wrong. sent4: something is a high-rise and/or it is not viral if it is not polyphonic. sent5: the totality is a nominalist. sent6: there is something such that it is not a gastrulation. sent7: something is polyphonic if it does roll Call. sent8: the canal is not a nominalist and it is not polyphonic if the bristlegrass is polyphonic. sent9: the totality is not a high-rise if the canal is a nominalist but it is not polyphonic. sent10: if there exists something such that it is high-rise or is not viral or both then the canal is not viral. sent11: if there is something such that that it is not a nominalist and is polyphonic does not hold the totality is not polyphonic. sent12: if the canal is not a kind of a nominalist and is not polyphonic the totality is not high-rise. sent13: the epicalyx is viral if that it is not a kind of a Maupassant and does camber clinocephaly is not right. sent14: if the bristlegrass is polyphonic the canal is not a nominalist. sent15: if the totality is a kind of a gastrulation it is high-rise. sent16: the totality is a kind of a gastrulation. sent17: the canal is polyphonic if it is a Maupassant. sent18: the bristlegrass does roll Call if the epicalyx is viral. sent19: the epicalyx is not a nominalist. sent20: the epicalyx cambers clinocephaly. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the epicalyx is not a Maupassant but it does camber clinocephaly does not hold.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the epicalyx is viral.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the bristlegrass rolls Call.; sent7 -> int3: if the bristlegrass does roll Call it is polyphonic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the bristlegrass is polyphonic.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the canal is not a kind of a nominalist and is not polyphonic.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the totality is not a kind of a high-rise.; sent15 & sent16 -> int7: the totality is a high-rise.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__