the hoodooing cornea occurs.
sent1: the fact that the downing apache does not occur but the being occurs is wrong. sent2: that the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur leads to the photosensitizing tillage. sent3: the allantoicness happens if that the downing industrialism does not occur and the allantoicness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if that the diverging does not occur and the politeness does not occur does not hold the tastefulness happens. sent5: that the diverging does not occur and the politeness happens is not true. sent6: if the inquisitorialness does not occur that the diverging does not occur but the politeness occurs does not hold. sent7: the photosensitizing tapping happens. sent8: if the inquisitorialness does not occur then that the diverging does not occur and the politeness does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the birth happens prevents that the inquisitorialness happens. sent10: that the politeness does not occur is brought about by that the tastefulness does not occur and the diverging does not occur. sent11: that the ablative does not occur but the birth occurs prevents that the photosensitizing tillage does not occur. sent12: the photosensitizing tapping occurs if the downing apache happens. sent13: if the mutter occurs then the fact that the downing industrialism does not occur and the allantoicness does not occur is wrong. sent14: if the downing apache does not occur then that the photosensitizing tillage does not occur and the photosensitizing tapping occurs hold. sent15: the birth does not occur. sent16: that not the ablativeness but the birth occurs is not correct. sent17: if the photosensitizing acidophilus but not the self-assertion happens the optometry occurs. sent18: that both the hoodooing cornea and the non-inquisitorialness happens is incorrect if the politeness does not occur. sent19: the photosensitizing tapping but not the tastefulness occurs if the downing apache occurs. sent20: the downing apache does not occur and the being does not occur if the allantoicness happens. sent21: that the photosensitizing tillage happens prevents that the hoodooing cornea does not occur. sent22: the fact that the diverging and the non-politeness happens does not hold. sent23: the inquisitorialness does not occur if the fact that the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur is not correct. sent24: if that the downing apache does not occur but the being happens does not hold the downing apache occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur is false.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the inquisitorialness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the diverging does not occur and the politeness does not occur is not correct.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the tastefulness occurs.; sent24 & sent1 -> int4: the downing apache occurs.; sent19 & int4 -> int5: the photosensitizing tapping and the non-tastefulness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the tastefulness does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the photosensitizing tillage occurs.; int9 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
the hoodooing cornea does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the hoodooing cornea occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the downing apache does not occur but the being occurs is wrong. sent2: that the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur leads to the photosensitizing tillage. sent3: the allantoicness happens if that the downing industrialism does not occur and the allantoicness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if that the diverging does not occur and the politeness does not occur does not hold the tastefulness happens. sent5: that the diverging does not occur and the politeness happens is not true. sent6: if the inquisitorialness does not occur that the diverging does not occur but the politeness occurs does not hold. sent7: the photosensitizing tapping happens. sent8: if the inquisitorialness does not occur then that the diverging does not occur and the politeness does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the birth happens prevents that the inquisitorialness happens. sent10: that the politeness does not occur is brought about by that the tastefulness does not occur and the diverging does not occur. sent11: that the ablative does not occur but the birth occurs prevents that the photosensitizing tillage does not occur. sent12: the photosensitizing tapping occurs if the downing apache happens. sent13: if the mutter occurs then the fact that the downing industrialism does not occur and the allantoicness does not occur is wrong. sent14: if the downing apache does not occur then that the photosensitizing tillage does not occur and the photosensitizing tapping occurs hold. sent15: the birth does not occur. sent16: that not the ablativeness but the birth occurs is not correct. sent17: if the photosensitizing acidophilus but not the self-assertion happens the optometry occurs. sent18: that both the hoodooing cornea and the non-inquisitorialness happens is incorrect if the politeness does not occur. sent19: the photosensitizing tapping but not the tastefulness occurs if the downing apache occurs. sent20: the downing apache does not occur and the being does not occur if the allantoicness happens. sent21: that the photosensitizing tillage happens prevents that the hoodooing cornea does not occur. sent22: the fact that the diverging and the non-politeness happens does not hold. sent23: the inquisitorialness does not occur if the fact that the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur is not correct. sent24: if that the downing apache does not occur but the being happens does not hold the downing apache occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur is false.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the inquisitorialness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: that the diverging does not occur and the politeness does not occur is not correct.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the tastefulness occurs.; sent24 & sent1 -> int4: the downing apache occurs.; sent19 & int4 -> int5: the photosensitizing tapping and the non-tastefulness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the tastefulness does not occur.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the ablativeness does not occur and the birth does not occur.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the photosensitizing tillage occurs.; int9 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__