the cistern is a Fabian.
sent1: there exists something such that it does not spang oncogene. sent2: the sissy is not a modification. sent3: the cistern is an ambiguity. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not eugenics then the fennel is not an ambiguity. sent5: the fennel does not style fifteenth. sent6: the fennel is Orphic. sent7: the sissy is a Chaetodontidae. sent8: if something does style fifteenth it is a kind of an ambiguity and it is non-eugenics. sent9: the fennel is not a modification but it is Orphic. sent10: the fact that the cistern is not a Fabian is not incorrect if there is something such that it styles fifteenth and/or is eugenics. sent11: if the fennel is not a modification but it is Orphic then it is an ambiguity. sent12: the sissy is not Orphic and not a Fabian. sent13: if something is an ambiguity but not eugenics then the fact that it is a kind of a Fabian is correct. sent14: if the fact that the sissy is a Chaetodontidae hold then it is prosthodontic. sent15: if a eugenics thing is an ambiguity that it is a kind of a Juncus is false. sent16: if something styles fifteenth then the cistern is not a Fabian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reflectometer is not eugenics.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not eugenics.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fennel is not an ambiguity.; sent11 & sent9 -> int3: the fennel is an ambiguity.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the reflectometer is eugenics.; int5 -> int6: the reflectometer does style fifteenth or it is eugenics or both.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that either it styles fifteenth or it is eugenics or both.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
something is not a Juncus.
sent15 -> int8: if the fennel is both eugenics and an ambiguity the fact that it is not a Juncus is true.; sent12 -> int9: there are non-Orphic and non-Fabian things.;
$hypothesis$ = the cistern is a Fabian. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it does not spang oncogene. sent2: the sissy is not a modification. sent3: the cistern is an ambiguity. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not eugenics then the fennel is not an ambiguity. sent5: the fennel does not style fifteenth. sent6: the fennel is Orphic. sent7: the sissy is a Chaetodontidae. sent8: if something does style fifteenth it is a kind of an ambiguity and it is non-eugenics. sent9: the fennel is not a modification but it is Orphic. sent10: the fact that the cistern is not a Fabian is not incorrect if there is something such that it styles fifteenth and/or is eugenics. sent11: if the fennel is not a modification but it is Orphic then it is an ambiguity. sent12: the sissy is not Orphic and not a Fabian. sent13: if something is an ambiguity but not eugenics then the fact that it is a kind of a Fabian is correct. sent14: if the fact that the sissy is a Chaetodontidae hold then it is prosthodontic. sent15: if a eugenics thing is an ambiguity that it is a kind of a Juncus is false. sent16: if something styles fifteenth then the cistern is not a Fabian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reflectometer is not eugenics.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not eugenics.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the fennel is not an ambiguity.; sent11 & sent9 -> int3: the fennel is an ambiguity.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the reflectometer is eugenics.; int5 -> int6: the reflectometer does style fifteenth or it is eugenics or both.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that either it styles fifteenth or it is eugenics or both.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__