the gooseflesh does not decoy impropriety.
sent1: if the kerosene is algometric it is best. sent2: the fact that the gooseflesh does decoy impropriety is true if it is non-cecal thing that does titrate. sent3: if the kerosene is a kind of a best the gooseflesh is non-cecal thing that titrates. sent4: if the kerosene is a best the gooseflesh does titrate. sent5: the menace is thirsty but it does not dangle if the bulimic is not futuristic. sent6: if that something is thirsty but it does not dangle is not false then it does not sterilize sorcery. sent7: if the menace does not sterilize sorcery then that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is not cecal does not hold. sent8: if the shank is not cecal it does not titrate and it is not best. sent9: if there exists something such that it is cecal and does not titrate then the gooseflesh is algometric. sent10: the bulimic is not futuristic. sent11: the gooseflesh titrates. sent12: if the kerosene is not algometric the gooseflesh does not decoy impropriety. sent13: the defeatist is not a Ali but it does discover. sent14: something that is best does decoy impropriety. sent15: the kerosene is algometric. sent16: if the menace does not sterilize sorcery the shank is not non-cecal but it does not titrate.
sent1 & sent15 -> int1: the kerosene is a best.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the gooseflesh is a kind of non-cecal thing that does titrate.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the kerosene decoys impropriety.
sent6 -> int3: if the menace is thirsty but it does not dangle it does not sterilize sorcery.; sent5 & sent10 -> int4: the menace is thirsty but it does not dangle.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the menace does not sterilize sorcery.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the shank is cecal but it does not titrate.; int6 -> int7: something is not non-cecal but it does not titrate.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: that the gooseflesh is algometric is not wrong.; int8 -> int9: something is algometric.; sent14 -> int10: if the kerosene is best then it does decoy impropriety.;
$hypothesis$ = the gooseflesh does not decoy impropriety. ; $context$ = sent1: if the kerosene is algometric it is best. sent2: the fact that the gooseflesh does decoy impropriety is true if it is non-cecal thing that does titrate. sent3: if the kerosene is a kind of a best the gooseflesh is non-cecal thing that titrates. sent4: if the kerosene is a best the gooseflesh does titrate. sent5: the menace is thirsty but it does not dangle if the bulimic is not futuristic. sent6: if that something is thirsty but it does not dangle is not false then it does not sterilize sorcery. sent7: if the menace does not sterilize sorcery then that it is a kind of non-thirsty thing that is not cecal does not hold. sent8: if the shank is not cecal it does not titrate and it is not best. sent9: if there exists something such that it is cecal and does not titrate then the gooseflesh is algometric. sent10: the bulimic is not futuristic. sent11: the gooseflesh titrates. sent12: if the kerosene is not algometric the gooseflesh does not decoy impropriety. sent13: the defeatist is not a Ali but it does discover. sent14: something that is best does decoy impropriety. sent15: the kerosene is algometric. sent16: if the menace does not sterilize sorcery the shank is not non-cecal but it does not titrate. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent15 -> int1: the kerosene is a best.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the gooseflesh is a kind of non-cecal thing that does titrate.; int2 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__