the bufo is contrasty.
sent1: the tangelo deafens disa. sent2: if there is something such that it is a parable the cyanide is myelinic and/or does not total. sent3: if the earner does not capture moquette then the cyanide is not blastoporal and it does not capture moquette. sent4: if the earner is not microeconomic then the bufo is a kind of anabiotic thing that is blastoporal. sent5: if something is myelinic it is not an inevitable. sent6: if that the earner does not capture moquette but it is a argentinosaur does not hold then the fact that the battledore is anabiotic is not incorrect. sent7: something is not microeconomic if it is not blastoporal and it does not capture moquette. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not non-anabiotic and evitable is wrong the battledore is not non-anabiotic. sent9: the falafel is a kind of a parable. sent10: if that the bufo does not deafen deliveryman and it does not unscrew battledore is wrong the battledore is microeconomic. sent11: the thermoelectricity is not vibrionic and it is not microeconomic if the cyanide is not microeconomic. sent12: the bufo does not deafen adulthood if the tangelo deafens disa. sent13: the battledore is not blastoporal if something is caffeinic. sent14: the thermoelectricity is non-contrasty if the earner is blastoporal but not non-contrasty. sent15: that the bufo does not deafen deliveryman and it does not unscrew battledore is wrong if it does not deafen adulthood. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is anabiotic and it is not inevitable is not false is false. sent17: if the earner is not a kind of a argentinosaur the battledore is anabiotic. sent18: that the bufo is not contrasty is not wrong if the fact that the thermoelectricity is non-vibrionic thing that is not microeconomic is true. sent19: if the battledore is microeconomic but it is not blastoporal the earner is blastoporal. sent20: if something is blastoporal then it is contrasty. sent21: something is caffeinic. sent22: the earner is not microeconomic if the fact that the battledore is microeconomic and it is inevitable does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the earner does not capture moquette but it is a kind of a argentinosaur does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the battledore is anabiotic is not wrong.; sent16 & sent8 -> int2: the battledore is not anabiotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the earner does not capture moquette but it is a argentinosaur.; int4 -> int5: that the earner does not capture moquette is true.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the cyanide is not blastoporal and it does not capture moquette.; sent7 -> int7: if the cyanide is non-blastoporal thing that does not capture moquette then that it is non-microeconomic is true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the cyanide is non-microeconomic.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the thermoelectricity is both not vibrionic and not microeconomic.; int9 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the bufo is contrasty.
sent20 -> int10: if the bufo is blastoporal the fact that it is contrasty hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the bufo is contrasty. ; $context$ = sent1: the tangelo deafens disa. sent2: if there is something such that it is a parable the cyanide is myelinic and/or does not total. sent3: if the earner does not capture moquette then the cyanide is not blastoporal and it does not capture moquette. sent4: if the earner is not microeconomic then the bufo is a kind of anabiotic thing that is blastoporal. sent5: if something is myelinic it is not an inevitable. sent6: if that the earner does not capture moquette but it is a argentinosaur does not hold then the fact that the battledore is anabiotic is not incorrect. sent7: something is not microeconomic if it is not blastoporal and it does not capture moquette. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not non-anabiotic and evitable is wrong the battledore is not non-anabiotic. sent9: the falafel is a kind of a parable. sent10: if that the bufo does not deafen deliveryman and it does not unscrew battledore is wrong the battledore is microeconomic. sent11: the thermoelectricity is not vibrionic and it is not microeconomic if the cyanide is not microeconomic. sent12: the bufo does not deafen adulthood if the tangelo deafens disa. sent13: the battledore is not blastoporal if something is caffeinic. sent14: the thermoelectricity is non-contrasty if the earner is blastoporal but not non-contrasty. sent15: that the bufo does not deafen deliveryman and it does not unscrew battledore is wrong if it does not deafen adulthood. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is anabiotic and it is not inevitable is not false is false. sent17: if the earner is not a kind of a argentinosaur the battledore is anabiotic. sent18: that the bufo is not contrasty is not wrong if the fact that the thermoelectricity is non-vibrionic thing that is not microeconomic is true. sent19: if the battledore is microeconomic but it is not blastoporal the earner is blastoporal. sent20: if something is blastoporal then it is contrasty. sent21: something is caffeinic. sent22: the earner is not microeconomic if the fact that the battledore is microeconomic and it is inevitable does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the earner does not capture moquette but it is a kind of a argentinosaur does not hold.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the battledore is anabiotic is not wrong.; sent16 & sent8 -> int2: the battledore is not anabiotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the earner does not capture moquette but it is a argentinosaur.; int4 -> int5: that the earner does not capture moquette is true.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the cyanide is not blastoporal and it does not capture moquette.; sent7 -> int7: if the cyanide is non-blastoporal thing that does not capture moquette then that it is non-microeconomic is true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the cyanide is non-microeconomic.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the thermoelectricity is both not vibrionic and not microeconomic.; int9 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__