the fact that either the doubles is a lawrencium or it is destructive or both is not right.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Alsophila is not true the dropper does not depressurize devastation. sent2: something does not release if it does depressurize devastation. sent3: something is both non-rupestral and not non-hydrophobic if it is not a kind of an upright. sent4: the fantast is both rupestral and not non-upright if the gooseberry is not a release. sent5: the dropper is not musicological. sent6: the crevice is not hydrophobic if that it is a disinterestedness and it does not depressurize devastation is not correct. sent7: the fact that something is a lawrencium and/or it is destructive is incorrect if it is not a Alsophila. sent8: the doubles is a kind of a lawrencium or it is destructive or both if the crevice is not a disinterestedness. sent9: something does not release if the fact that it is hydrophobic and does not depressurize devastation does not hold. sent10: if the perspirer does not middle that the fact that the crevice is not a kind of a middle but it is musicological is wrong is correct. sent11: that something is both not a disinterestedness and a middle does not hold if it is not musicological. sent12: something is not a disinterestedness if that it is a kind of non-middle thing that is not musicological is not correct. sent13: the fact that the gooseberry is a kind of hydrophobic thing that does not depressurize devastation is not correct if the dropper does not depressurize devastation. sent14: if that something is not a kind of a disinterestedness but it is a middle does not hold then it is not upright. sent15: if the perspirer does not middle that the crevice is a kind of middle thing that is not musicological is false. sent16: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Alsophila. sent17: that the gooseberry is hydrophobic and not destructive is wrong. sent18: that the gooseberry is hydrophobic and does depressurize devastation does not hold. sent19: if the fantast is both rupestral and upright the perspirer is not a kind of a middle. sent20: the perspirer does not depressurize devastation.
sent16 & sent1 -> int1: that the dropper does not depressurize devastation hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the gooseberry is hydrophobic but it does not depressurize devastation is not right.; sent9 -> int3: the gooseberry is not a kind of a release if the fact that it is hydrophobic and it does not depressurize devastation is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the gooseberry is not a release.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fantast is rupestral and is an upright.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the perspirer is not a middle.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: that the crevice is not middle and it is not musicological is not true.; sent12 -> int8: if the fact that the crevice does not middle and it is not musicological is not true then it is not a disinterestedness.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the crevice is not a disinterestedness.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that either the doubles is a lawrencium or it is destructive or both is not correct.
sent7 -> int10: the fact that the doubles is a lawrencium and/or it is destructive does not hold if it is not a Alsophila.; sent3 -> int11: the dropper is not rupestral but it is hydrophobic if it is not an upright.; sent14 -> int12: if the fact that the dropper is not a disinterestedness and is a kind of a middle is incorrect it is not upright.; sent11 -> int13: the fact that the dropper is not a disinterestedness and is a middle does not hold if it is not musicological.; int13 & sent5 -> int14: the fact that the dropper is not a disinterestedness and is middle is not correct.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the dropper is not an upright.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the dropper is not rupestral and is hydrophobic.; int16 -> int17: the dropper is hydrophobic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the doubles is a lawrencium or it is destructive or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Alsophila is not true the dropper does not depressurize devastation. sent2: something does not release if it does depressurize devastation. sent3: something is both non-rupestral and not non-hydrophobic if it is not a kind of an upright. sent4: the fantast is both rupestral and not non-upright if the gooseberry is not a release. sent5: the dropper is not musicological. sent6: the crevice is not hydrophobic if that it is a disinterestedness and it does not depressurize devastation is not correct. sent7: the fact that something is a lawrencium and/or it is destructive is incorrect if it is not a Alsophila. sent8: the doubles is a kind of a lawrencium or it is destructive or both if the crevice is not a disinterestedness. sent9: something does not release if the fact that it is hydrophobic and does not depressurize devastation does not hold. sent10: if the perspirer does not middle that the fact that the crevice is not a kind of a middle but it is musicological is wrong is correct. sent11: that something is both not a disinterestedness and a middle does not hold if it is not musicological. sent12: something is not a disinterestedness if that it is a kind of non-middle thing that is not musicological is not correct. sent13: the fact that the gooseberry is a kind of hydrophobic thing that does not depressurize devastation is not correct if the dropper does not depressurize devastation. sent14: if that something is not a kind of a disinterestedness but it is a middle does not hold then it is not upright. sent15: if the perspirer does not middle that the crevice is a kind of middle thing that is not musicological is false. sent16: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Alsophila. sent17: that the gooseberry is hydrophobic and not destructive is wrong. sent18: that the gooseberry is hydrophobic and does depressurize devastation does not hold. sent19: if the fantast is both rupestral and upright the perspirer is not a kind of a middle. sent20: the perspirer does not depressurize devastation. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent1 -> int1: that the dropper does not depressurize devastation hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: that the gooseberry is hydrophobic but it does not depressurize devastation is not right.; sent9 -> int3: the gooseberry is not a kind of a release if the fact that it is hydrophobic and it does not depressurize devastation is false.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the gooseberry is not a release.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fantast is rupestral and is an upright.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: the perspirer is not a middle.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: that the crevice is not middle and it is not musicological is not true.; sent12 -> int8: if the fact that the crevice does not middle and it is not musicological is not true then it is not a disinterestedness.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the crevice is not a disinterestedness.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__