the fact that that both the non-lidlessness and the non-pointlessness happens is triggered by that the squish occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the watch does not occur. sent2: the infliction does not occur. sent3: the neurobiologicalness does not occur if both the bellowing and the lumbering happens. sent4: the sureness does not occur. sent5: the cupping happens. sent6: not the harlequining flagellum but the rolling happens. sent7: the phonologicalness does not occur. sent8: the bacteriologicalness happens. sent9: if that the three-pieceness happens and the isolation happens does not hold the three-pieceness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that both the pointlessness and the confidentness occurs is false the pointlessness does not occur. sent11: the undulation does not occur and the passing spare does not occur. sent12: if both the extorting and the lidlessness occurs the squish does not occur. sent13: if the disfigurement happens that the dysgenicness does not occur and the retail does not occur is right. sent14: that the harlequining flagellum does not occur but the rolling occurs triggers that the extorting occurs. sent15: that the fact that the pointlessness happens and the confidentness occurs is wrong is not false. sent16: the huing homepage does not occur if the fact that the huing homepage and the watch happens is false. sent17: the squishing is triggered by that the extorting happens and the lidlessness happens. sent18: the fact that the harlequining flagellum does not occur is right. sent19: the lyric occurs. sent20: that the huing overspill happens is triggered by that the leaning and the passing ladylove happens. sent21: that the extorting occurs is triggered by that the harlequining flagellum and the rolling occurs. sent22: the typographicness is brought about by that the huing mockernut happens and the biodefense occurs.
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the extorting happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lidlessness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the extorting and the lidlessness happens.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the squishing does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the squishing occurs is not incorrect.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the lidlessness does not occur.; sent10 & sent15 -> int6: that the pointlessness does not occur is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: both the non-lidlessness and the pointedness happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that both the non-lidlessness and the non-pointlessness happens is triggered by that the squish occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the watch does not occur. sent2: the infliction does not occur. sent3: the neurobiologicalness does not occur if both the bellowing and the lumbering happens. sent4: the sureness does not occur. sent5: the cupping happens. sent6: not the harlequining flagellum but the rolling happens. sent7: the phonologicalness does not occur. sent8: the bacteriologicalness happens. sent9: if that the three-pieceness happens and the isolation happens does not hold the three-pieceness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that both the pointlessness and the confidentness occurs is false the pointlessness does not occur. sent11: the undulation does not occur and the passing spare does not occur. sent12: if both the extorting and the lidlessness occurs the squish does not occur. sent13: if the disfigurement happens that the dysgenicness does not occur and the retail does not occur is right. sent14: that the harlequining flagellum does not occur but the rolling occurs triggers that the extorting occurs. sent15: that the fact that the pointlessness happens and the confidentness occurs is wrong is not false. sent16: the huing homepage does not occur if the fact that the huing homepage and the watch happens is false. sent17: the squishing is triggered by that the extorting happens and the lidlessness happens. sent18: the fact that the harlequining flagellum does not occur is right. sent19: the lyric occurs. sent20: that the huing overspill happens is triggered by that the leaning and the passing ladylove happens. sent21: that the extorting occurs is triggered by that the harlequining flagellum and the rolling occurs. sent22: the typographicness is brought about by that the huing mockernut happens and the biodefense occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent6 -> int1: the extorting happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lidlessness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the extorting and the lidlessness happens.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the squishing does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the squishing occurs is not incorrect.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the lidlessness does not occur.; sent10 & sent15 -> int6: that the pointlessness does not occur is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: both the non-lidlessness and the pointedness happens.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__