that something is not a courbaril and is a Turkmen does not hold.
sent1: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Rhamnus the cracking is not a courbaril. sent2: the fact that the cracking is a Rhamnus and/or it does not crystallize feculence is incorrect if there exists something such that it does reline three. sent3: the cracking is not a Turkmen. sent4: the regular does not weld expectedness and is not non-Turkmen. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the cracking is a Rhamnus and/or it does not crystallize feculence is incorrect is not wrong then the stickpin is a courbaril. sent6: that that the cracking is a kind of a Rhamnus and/or it is not a kind of a courbaril is true is not correct. sent7: if there is something such that it is a courbaril the fact that either the regular does crystallize feculence or it is not a Turkmen or both is wrong. sent8: there is something such that it does not vroom and it is a seasonal. sent9: if the regular does crystallize feculence the cracking does not crystallize feculence and is a courbaril. sent10: there exists something such that it does reline three. sent11: if the stickpin is a courbaril then the regular is not a kind of a courbaril and is Turkmen.
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: that the cracking is a Rhamnus and/or it does not crystallize feculence is false.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the stickpin is a kind of a courbaril.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the regular is not a courbaril but it is a Turkmen.; int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that something is not a courbaril and is a Turkmen does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Rhamnus the cracking is not a courbaril. sent2: the fact that the cracking is a Rhamnus and/or it does not crystallize feculence is incorrect if there exists something such that it does reline three. sent3: the cracking is not a Turkmen. sent4: the regular does not weld expectedness and is not non-Turkmen. sent5: if the fact that the fact that the cracking is a Rhamnus and/or it does not crystallize feculence is incorrect is not wrong then the stickpin is a courbaril. sent6: that that the cracking is a kind of a Rhamnus and/or it is not a kind of a courbaril is true is not correct. sent7: if there is something such that it is a courbaril the fact that either the regular does crystallize feculence or it is not a Turkmen or both is wrong. sent8: there is something such that it does not vroom and it is a seasonal. sent9: if the regular does crystallize feculence the cracking does not crystallize feculence and is a courbaril. sent10: there exists something such that it does reline three. sent11: if the stickpin is a courbaril then the regular is not a kind of a courbaril and is Turkmen. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: that the cracking is a Rhamnus and/or it does not crystallize feculence is false.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the stickpin is a kind of a courbaril.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the regular is not a courbaril but it is a Turkmen.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__