that there exists something such that if it is an incumbency it is not a ranging and it is not biotypic is not correct.
sent1: the demoniac is not a ranging and is not biotypic if it is an incumbency. sent2: the demoniac ranges and is non-biotypic if it is a kind of an incumbency. sent3: the demoniac is not biotypic if it is a kind of an incumbency. sent4: there is something such that if it is an incumbency then the fact that it is non-biotypic is not incorrect. sent5: the cookbook is non-biotypic thing that is not terminal if it does beset. sent6: there is something such that if it is an incumbency it is a ranging and is not biotypic. sent7: if the demoniac is a constitutional then it is not a propagandist and it does not overrun toxicognath. sent8: there exists something such that if it is an incumbency then it is not a ranging and it is biotypic. sent9: there exists something such that if it does concert it does not nurse Melbourne and is not anaerobic. sent10: something that is a pyromaniac is not a box and does not become sodalite. sent11: there exists something such that if it is an incumbency then the fact that it is not a kind of a ranging is not incorrect.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a kind of a pyromaniac it is not a box and it does not become sodalite.
sent10 -> int1: the toxicognath is not a box and it does not become sodalite if it is a pyromaniac.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is an incumbency it is not a ranging and it is not biotypic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the demoniac is not a ranging and is not biotypic if it is an incumbency. sent2: the demoniac ranges and is non-biotypic if it is a kind of an incumbency. sent3: the demoniac is not biotypic if it is a kind of an incumbency. sent4: there is something such that if it is an incumbency then the fact that it is non-biotypic is not incorrect. sent5: the cookbook is non-biotypic thing that is not terminal if it does beset. sent6: there is something such that if it is an incumbency it is a ranging and is not biotypic. sent7: if the demoniac is a constitutional then it is not a propagandist and it does not overrun toxicognath. sent8: there exists something such that if it is an incumbency then it is not a ranging and it is biotypic. sent9: there exists something such that if it does concert it does not nurse Melbourne and is not anaerobic. sent10: something that is a pyromaniac is not a box and does not become sodalite. sent11: there exists something such that if it is an incumbency then the fact that it is not a kind of a ranging is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__