the cleats is not a malacology.
sent1: the fact that the calmness is not postganglionic is right if the pickelhaube is not a Altaic. sent2: that the cleats bakes is not true. sent3: if the cleats is non-Altaic the pickelhaube is not a malacology. sent4: if the vocabulary does not bake then that the pickelhaube is a Altaic and it reruns Tsimshian is false. sent5: if the fact that the pickelhaube is a Altaic and it does rerun Tsimshian does not hold then the calmness is not postganglionic. sent6: the fingerboard is not a malacology. sent7: the vocabulary does not bake. sent8: the cleats is a malacology if the calmness is not postganglionic. sent9: if the vocabulary is not a Altaic the fact that the calmness does bake and is postganglionic does not hold. sent10: the cleats does bake if the vocabulary is not a malacology. sent11: the fact that the cleats does rerun Tsimshian and it is a kind of a malacology is not correct if the pickelhaube does not bake.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the pickelhaube is a Altaic and it does rerun Tsimshian is incorrect.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the calmness is not postganglionic.; sent8 & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the cleats is not a malacology. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the calmness is not postganglionic is right if the pickelhaube is not a Altaic. sent2: that the cleats bakes is not true. sent3: if the cleats is non-Altaic the pickelhaube is not a malacology. sent4: if the vocabulary does not bake then that the pickelhaube is a Altaic and it reruns Tsimshian is false. sent5: if the fact that the pickelhaube is a Altaic and it does rerun Tsimshian does not hold then the calmness is not postganglionic. sent6: the fingerboard is not a malacology. sent7: the vocabulary does not bake. sent8: the cleats is a malacology if the calmness is not postganglionic. sent9: if the vocabulary is not a Altaic the fact that the calmness does bake and is postganglionic does not hold. sent10: the cleats does bake if the vocabulary is not a malacology. sent11: the fact that the cleats does rerun Tsimshian and it is a kind of a malacology is not correct if the pickelhaube does not bake. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the pickelhaube is a Altaic and it does rerun Tsimshian is incorrect.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the calmness is not postganglionic.; sent8 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__