the tome is a popover and it is cortico-hypothalamic.
sent1: the diamante is superficial. sent2: that something is a kind of a popover and is cortico-hypothalamic is wrong if it does not repine Tamm. sent3: that the tome is a writ is not incorrect. sent4: if the diamante is cortico-hypothalamic and it is superficial the surrenderer does not lean whiz. sent5: the bourbon is a kind of a enteron. sent6: the surrenderer is cortico-hypothalamic. sent7: the bourbon is a enteron if that the diamante is superficial hold. sent8: if there is something such that it is ontogenetic the bourbon is a popover. sent9: the diamante leans whiz if there exists something such that it is superficial. sent10: the surrenderer does lean whiz if there is something such that it is traceable. sent11: the vesicant is oncological and is not unseasonable. sent12: the tome is superficial. sent13: the speculum is not bloody and repines encounter. sent14: if something is a enteron but it does not rev then it does lean glop. sent15: the speculum is traceable. sent16: the surrenderer does not lean whiz if the bourbon leans glop and repines Tamm. sent17: the tome is a popover if the bourbon is ontogenetic. sent18: if the diamante is superficial the bourbon is a kind of a enteron but it does not rev. sent19: the amaranth is a enteron and leans Compton. sent20: the bourbon is not non-superficial. sent21: the tome revs if there is something such that it is a popover. sent22: something that is traceable thing that does not rev is cortico-hypothalamic. sent23: the tome does repine vesicant and is ontogenetic. sent24: if the tome is a writ it is cortico-hypothalamic.
sent14 -> int1: if that the bourbon is a enteron but it does not rev hold it leans glop.; sent18 & sent1 -> int2: the bourbon is a kind of a enteron but it does not rev.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bourbon does lean glop.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bourbon repines Tamm.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bourbon does lean glop and does repine Tamm.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the surrenderer does not lean whiz.; sent15 -> int6: something is not untraceable.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the surrenderer leans whiz.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the bourbon does not repine Tamm.; sent24 & sent3 -> int10: the tome is cortico-hypothalamic.;
that the tome is a kind of a popover that is cortico-hypothalamic is incorrect.
sent2 -> int11: the fact that the tome is a popover and it is cortico-hypothalamic is not true if it does not repine Tamm.;
$hypothesis$ = the tome is a popover and it is cortico-hypothalamic. ; $context$ = sent1: the diamante is superficial. sent2: that something is a kind of a popover and is cortico-hypothalamic is wrong if it does not repine Tamm. sent3: that the tome is a writ is not incorrect. sent4: if the diamante is cortico-hypothalamic and it is superficial the surrenderer does not lean whiz. sent5: the bourbon is a kind of a enteron. sent6: the surrenderer is cortico-hypothalamic. sent7: the bourbon is a enteron if that the diamante is superficial hold. sent8: if there is something such that it is ontogenetic the bourbon is a popover. sent9: the diamante leans whiz if there exists something such that it is superficial. sent10: the surrenderer does lean whiz if there is something such that it is traceable. sent11: the vesicant is oncological and is not unseasonable. sent12: the tome is superficial. sent13: the speculum is not bloody and repines encounter. sent14: if something is a enteron but it does not rev then it does lean glop. sent15: the speculum is traceable. sent16: the surrenderer does not lean whiz if the bourbon leans glop and repines Tamm. sent17: the tome is a popover if the bourbon is ontogenetic. sent18: if the diamante is superficial the bourbon is a kind of a enteron but it does not rev. sent19: the amaranth is a enteron and leans Compton. sent20: the bourbon is not non-superficial. sent21: the tome revs if there is something such that it is a popover. sent22: something that is traceable thing that does not rev is cortico-hypothalamic. sent23: the tome does repine vesicant and is ontogenetic. sent24: if the tome is a writ it is cortico-hypothalamic. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if that the bourbon is a enteron but it does not rev hold it leans glop.; sent18 & sent1 -> int2: the bourbon is a kind of a enteron but it does not rev.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the bourbon does lean glop.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bourbon repines Tamm.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the bourbon does lean glop and does repine Tamm.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the surrenderer does not lean whiz.; sent15 -> int6: something is not untraceable.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the surrenderer leans whiz.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the bourbon does not repine Tamm.; sent24 & sent3 -> int10: the tome is cortico-hypothalamic.; __UNKNOWN__