there exists something such that if it is both not a allice and fossorial then it idealizes nonequivalence.
sent1: if something that is not a better does overwhelm then it is prepositional. sent2: if the waltzer does idealize nonequivalence and it is clad then it is an airship. sent3: the kinsman is a telephotograph if it idealizes tensor and it is fossorial. sent4: there is something such that if it is not intercellular and it is a documentary it is not non-choric. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a sole and it is infinite then it is a kind of a forwarding. sent6: if the weighbridge is not fossorial but it salts it is a sole. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a Lutheran does dwarf Eiffel it guards geneticism. sent8: if the waltzer is not a Tosk but it rips it idealizes Edward. sent9: that the waltzer idealizes nonequivalence is not incorrect if it is a kind of a allice and it is fossorial. sent10: if something that is not a allice is fossorial then it does idealize nonequivalence. sent11: that the waltzer is advective is not wrong if it is not a Leuciscus and it is a allice. sent12: if something that is non-maximal does guard blindness then it guards labdanum. sent13: if something does subside homonym and is arbitrable it overwhelms. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Ruritanian and is advective it is a snarer. sent15: if something is non-prepositional but it is nodular then it does idealize tolu. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is non-monolingual but not non-backing hold it is strong. sent17: something is isothermic if it is both pentatonic and a Norfolk. sent18: if something that is non-middle-class is a kind of an alert it idealizes Edward. sent19: something does idealize nonequivalence if it is a allice and fossorial. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a surname and it is middle-class then it guards urinal. sent21: that there is something such that if it is a allice and is fossorial then it does idealize nonequivalence is not false.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the waltzer does idealize nonequivalence is not wrong if it is not a kind of a allice and it is fossorial.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is both not a allice and fossorial then it idealizes nonequivalence. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a better does overwhelm then it is prepositional. sent2: if the waltzer does idealize nonequivalence and it is clad then it is an airship. sent3: the kinsman is a telephotograph if it idealizes tensor and it is fossorial. sent4: there is something such that if it is not intercellular and it is a documentary it is not non-choric. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a sole and it is infinite then it is a kind of a forwarding. sent6: if the weighbridge is not fossorial but it salts it is a sole. sent7: if something that is not a kind of a Lutheran does dwarf Eiffel it guards geneticism. sent8: if the waltzer is not a Tosk but it rips it idealizes Edward. sent9: that the waltzer idealizes nonequivalence is not incorrect if it is a kind of a allice and it is fossorial. sent10: if something that is not a allice is fossorial then it does idealize nonequivalence. sent11: that the waltzer is advective is not wrong if it is not a Leuciscus and it is a allice. sent12: if something that is non-maximal does guard blindness then it guards labdanum. sent13: if something does subside homonym and is arbitrable it overwhelms. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Ruritanian and is advective it is a snarer. sent15: if something is non-prepositional but it is nodular then it does idealize tolu. sent16: there exists something such that if that it is non-monolingual but not non-backing hold it is strong. sent17: something is isothermic if it is both pentatonic and a Norfolk. sent18: if something that is non-middle-class is a kind of an alert it idealizes Edward. sent19: something does idealize nonequivalence if it is a allice and fossorial. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a surname and it is middle-class then it guards urinal. sent21: that there is something such that if it is a allice and is fossorial then it does idealize nonequivalence is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the waltzer does idealize nonequivalence is not wrong if it is not a kind of a allice and it is fossorial.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__