the fact that the Sodom does not fingerprint pipefish and/or is not a kind of a genip does not hold.
sent1: if something does not mirror then the fact that it does not fingerprint pipefish and/or is not a genip is incorrect. sent2: everything is electronics. sent3: if the braid is not a mirrored and does not instrument Topeka then the Sodom does not mirrored. sent4: if something is not yogistic or it is not a contradictoriness or both then that it is not a contradictoriness is right. sent5: the man-eater is a Pagellus and does instrument Mongol. sent6: if there exists something such that it does instrument Mongol either the rebutter is a kind of a seaward or it instrument Mongol or both. sent7: there is something such that that it does not instrument Mongol and is not impartial is false. sent8: the fact that the spacewalker is a contradictoriness is not false if the rebutter is not non-yogistic and is not a contradictoriness. sent9: the braid is not yogistic or it is not a kind of a contradictoriness or both if the saltbush is not a Bruchus. sent10: the Sodom is electronics. sent11: if the rebutter is seaward then the spacewalker is a kind of a seaward. sent12: if the man-eater is a Bruchus then the rebutter is yogistic but it is not a kind of a contradictoriness. sent13: the Mongol either does not slice walk-on or does not fingerprint pipefish or both. sent14: that the saltbush does not instrument Topeka and it does not mirror does not hold if there is something such that it is a kind of a contradictoriness. sent15: something does not mirror and it does not instrument Topeka if it is not a contradictoriness. sent16: that that something is impartial but it is not a Bruchus is not correct if it is a seaward is not false. sent17: if that the spacewalker is impartial but it is not a kind of a Bruchus is not right the saltbush is not a kind of a Bruchus. sent18: the Sodom fingerprints pipefish and/or is not a genip. sent19: everything does not fingerprint pipefish and it is electronics. sent20: the man-eater is a Bruchus if it is non-seaward.
sent19 -> int1: the Sodom does not fingerprint pipefish but it is electronics.; int1 -> int2: the Sodom does not fingerprint pipefish.; int2 -> hypothesis;
the Sodom does not slice glare.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Sodom does not fingerprint pipefish and/or is not a kind of a genip does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not mirror then the fact that it does not fingerprint pipefish and/or is not a genip is incorrect. sent2: everything is electronics. sent3: if the braid is not a mirrored and does not instrument Topeka then the Sodom does not mirrored. sent4: if something is not yogistic or it is not a contradictoriness or both then that it is not a contradictoriness is right. sent5: the man-eater is a Pagellus and does instrument Mongol. sent6: if there exists something such that it does instrument Mongol either the rebutter is a kind of a seaward or it instrument Mongol or both. sent7: there is something such that that it does not instrument Mongol and is not impartial is false. sent8: the fact that the spacewalker is a contradictoriness is not false if the rebutter is not non-yogistic and is not a contradictoriness. sent9: the braid is not yogistic or it is not a kind of a contradictoriness or both if the saltbush is not a Bruchus. sent10: the Sodom is electronics. sent11: if the rebutter is seaward then the spacewalker is a kind of a seaward. sent12: if the man-eater is a Bruchus then the rebutter is yogistic but it is not a kind of a contradictoriness. sent13: the Mongol either does not slice walk-on or does not fingerprint pipefish or both. sent14: that the saltbush does not instrument Topeka and it does not mirror does not hold if there is something such that it is a kind of a contradictoriness. sent15: something does not mirror and it does not instrument Topeka if it is not a contradictoriness. sent16: that that something is impartial but it is not a Bruchus is not correct if it is a seaward is not false. sent17: if that the spacewalker is impartial but it is not a kind of a Bruchus is not right the saltbush is not a kind of a Bruchus. sent18: the Sodom fingerprints pipefish and/or is not a genip. sent19: everything does not fingerprint pipefish and it is electronics. sent20: the man-eater is a Bruchus if it is non-seaward. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: the Sodom does not fingerprint pipefish but it is electronics.; int1 -> int2: the Sodom does not fingerprint pipefish.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__