that if the unprofitableness occurs and the bryophyticness occurs then the fact that the specialism does not occur is true is not correct.
sent1: the unshockableness is brought about by that both the unprofitableness and the bryophyticness occurs. sent2: if the impatientness does not occur then the fact that the amauroticness and the rhythmicalness occurs does not hold. sent3: if that both the poking and the impatientness occurs does not hold the specialism does not occur. sent4: if the shockableness does not occur the fact that both the poke and the impatientness occurs does not hold. sent5: the impatientness does not occur if the shockableness does not occur and the poking does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unprofitableness and the bryophyticness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the shockableness does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the poke and the impatientness happens is incorrect.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the specialism does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that both the amauroticness and the rhythmicalness occurs is not right is not false.
$hypothesis$ = that if the unprofitableness occurs and the bryophyticness occurs then the fact that the specialism does not occur is true is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the unshockableness is brought about by that both the unprofitableness and the bryophyticness occurs. sent2: if the impatientness does not occur then the fact that the amauroticness and the rhythmicalness occurs does not hold. sent3: if that both the poking and the impatientness occurs does not hold the specialism does not occur. sent4: if the shockableness does not occur the fact that both the poke and the impatientness occurs does not hold. sent5: the impatientness does not occur if the shockableness does not occur and the poking does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unprofitableness and the bryophyticness happens.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the shockableness does not occur.; sent4 & int1 -> int2: that the poke and the impatientness happens is incorrect.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the specialism does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__