the pseudoephedrine is a kind of non-carcinogenic thing that does not piece wanter.
sent1: the filmmaker is not a hub-and-spoke if either something does beggar reuptake or it hovers or both. sent2: if the fact that the filmmaker is not a hub-and-spoke is not false then the biologist is an upset and is a kind of a hub-and-spoke. sent3: if something upsets it does hog kph. sent4: the fact that the infructescence hovers but it is not carcinogenic is incorrect if the filmmaker does not beggar reuptake. sent5: the infructescence hovers. sent6: the fact that the pseudoephedrine is a kind of non-carcinogenic thing that does not piece wanter is not false if the biologist hogs kph.
sent5 -> int1: the infructescence beggars reuptake and/or it hovers.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that either it beggars reuptake or it does hover or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the filmmaker is not a kind of a hub-and-spoke is true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the biologist is an upset that is a hub-and-spoke hold.; int4 -> int5: the biologist does upset.; sent3 -> int6: if the biologist does upset then it does hog kph.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the biologist does hog kph.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the armlet is carcinogenic.
$hypothesis$ = the pseudoephedrine is a kind of non-carcinogenic thing that does not piece wanter. ; $context$ = sent1: the filmmaker is not a hub-and-spoke if either something does beggar reuptake or it hovers or both. sent2: if the fact that the filmmaker is not a hub-and-spoke is not false then the biologist is an upset and is a kind of a hub-and-spoke. sent3: if something upsets it does hog kph. sent4: the fact that the infructescence hovers but it is not carcinogenic is incorrect if the filmmaker does not beggar reuptake. sent5: the infructescence hovers. sent6: the fact that the pseudoephedrine is a kind of non-carcinogenic thing that does not piece wanter is not false if the biologist hogs kph. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the infructescence beggars reuptake and/or it hovers.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that either it beggars reuptake or it does hover or both.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the filmmaker is not a kind of a hub-and-spoke is true.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the biologist is an upset that is a hub-and-spoke hold.; int4 -> int5: the biologist does upset.; sent3 -> int6: if the biologist does upset then it does hog kph.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the biologist does hog kph.; int7 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__