the session occurs.
sent1: the fact that the alluding occurs hold. sent2: the extradition does not occur. sent3: the fact that the extradition does not occur and the deduction does not occur is not right if the alluding happens. sent4: that not the antiseptic but the attachment happens is incorrect if the segregating dobra does not occur. sent5: that the segregating dobra does not occur and the alluding does not occur is not wrong if the stupidity does not occur. sent6: that the conversing does not occur and the opaqueness does not occur is false. sent7: the fact that the attachment does not occur and the antiseptic does not occur is wrong if that the Creole occurs is not incorrect. sent8: that the segregating dobra occurs hold if that the attachment does not occur and the antisepticness does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the bridle occurs is triggered by the segregating Lisu. sent10: that the deduction occurs prevents the non-Creoleness. sent11: if the segregating dobra occurs then that the session happens is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deduction does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the extradition does not occur and the deduction does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the extradition does not occur and the deduction does not occur is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the deduction occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the Creole occurs.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the fact that the attachment does not occur and the antiseptic does not occur hold is not right.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the segregating dobra happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the session does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the session occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the alluding occurs hold. sent2: the extradition does not occur. sent3: the fact that the extradition does not occur and the deduction does not occur is not right if the alluding happens. sent4: that not the antiseptic but the attachment happens is incorrect if the segregating dobra does not occur. sent5: that the segregating dobra does not occur and the alluding does not occur is not wrong if the stupidity does not occur. sent6: that the conversing does not occur and the opaqueness does not occur is false. sent7: the fact that the attachment does not occur and the antiseptic does not occur is wrong if that the Creole occurs is not incorrect. sent8: that the segregating dobra occurs hold if that the attachment does not occur and the antisepticness does not occur does not hold. sent9: that the bridle occurs is triggered by the segregating Lisu. sent10: that the deduction occurs prevents the non-Creoleness. sent11: if the segregating dobra occurs then that the session happens is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the deduction does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the extradition does not occur and the deduction does not occur.; sent3 & sent1 -> int2: that the extradition does not occur and the deduction does not occur is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the deduction occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the Creole occurs.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the fact that the attachment does not occur and the antiseptic does not occur hold is not right.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the segregating dobra happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__