the contralto is a Kwell or it is a crosier or both if the canaliculus does not fear ferritin.
sent1: the fact that that the loft is menstrual and is a Kwell hold is incorrect. sent2: if the canaliculus does not fear ferritin the loft is both a Vaishnava and not menstrual. sent3: if something is a kind of an adjective the fact that it is a Kwell hold. sent4: if the canaliculus fears ferritin the loft is a kind of a Vaishnava but it is not menstrual. sent5: that the fact that the contralto is an adjective is not wrong if something is a Vaishnava and not menstrual is right. sent6: the loft is not menstrual.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canaliculus does not fear ferritin.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the loft is a Vaishnava that is not menstrual.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Vaishnava and it is not menstrual.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the contralto is adjective.; sent3 -> int4: the contralto is a Kwell if it is adjective.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the contralto is a kind of a Kwell.; int5 -> int6: the contralto is a Kwell or it is a crosier or both.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the commodity is both a eriogonum and not menstrual.
sent1 -> int7: there is something such that that it is menstrual and it is a kind of a Kwell is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the contralto is a Kwell or it is a crosier or both if the canaliculus does not fear ferritin. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that that the loft is menstrual and is a Kwell hold is incorrect. sent2: if the canaliculus does not fear ferritin the loft is both a Vaishnava and not menstrual. sent3: if something is a kind of an adjective the fact that it is a Kwell hold. sent4: if the canaliculus fears ferritin the loft is a kind of a Vaishnava but it is not menstrual. sent5: that the fact that the contralto is an adjective is not wrong if something is a Vaishnava and not menstrual is right. sent6: the loft is not menstrual. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the canaliculus does not fear ferritin.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the loft is a Vaishnava that is not menstrual.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a kind of a Vaishnava and it is not menstrual.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the contralto is adjective.; sent3 -> int4: the contralto is a Kwell if it is adjective.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the contralto is a kind of a Kwell.; int5 -> int6: the contralto is a Kwell or it is a crosier or both.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__