the immortelle does stub puka and is not traditional.
sent1: The puka does stub immortelle. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a rootlet and it does arrive father does not hold. sent3: if something that does arrive cobalamin is traditional it is not a pederasty. sent4: the immortelle does arrive cobalamin. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a rootlet that arrives father is not incorrect is not correct the father does not arrives father. sent6: if the immortelle is not a pederasty that the patriarchate is a kind of a nosiness and interposes huddle is wrong. sent7: the immortelle does stub puka. sent8: if the fact that the patriarchate is a kind of a nosiness and it does interpose huddle is not true then the father is not a reliquary. sent9: something is a kind of a reliquary and does arrive patriarchate if it does not arrive father. sent10: The cobalamin does arrive immortelle.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the immortelle is traditional.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the immortelle does arrive cobalamin and it is traditional.; sent3 -> int2: if the immortelle does arrive cobalamin and is traditional then it is not a kind of a pederasty.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the immortelle is not a pederasty.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the patriarchate is a nosiness and does interpose huddle does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the father is not a kind of a reliquary is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int6: if the father does not arrive father it is a reliquary and does arrive patriarchate.; sent2 & sent5 -> int7: the father does not arrive father.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the father is a kind of a reliquary that does arrive patriarchate.; int8 -> int9: the father is a reliquary.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the immortelle is not traditional.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the immortelle does stub puka and is not traditional. ; $context$ = sent1: The puka does stub immortelle. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a rootlet and it does arrive father does not hold. sent3: if something that does arrive cobalamin is traditional it is not a pederasty. sent4: the immortelle does arrive cobalamin. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is a rootlet that arrives father is not incorrect is not correct the father does not arrives father. sent6: if the immortelle is not a pederasty that the patriarchate is a kind of a nosiness and interposes huddle is wrong. sent7: the immortelle does stub puka. sent8: if the fact that the patriarchate is a kind of a nosiness and it does interpose huddle is not true then the father is not a reliquary. sent9: something is a kind of a reliquary and does arrive patriarchate if it does not arrive father. sent10: The cobalamin does arrive immortelle. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the immortelle is traditional.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the immortelle does arrive cobalamin and it is traditional.; sent3 -> int2: if the immortelle does arrive cobalamin and is traditional then it is not a kind of a pederasty.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the immortelle is not a pederasty.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the fact that the patriarchate is a nosiness and does interpose huddle does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the father is not a kind of a reliquary is not incorrect.; sent9 -> int6: if the father does not arrive father it is a reliquary and does arrive patriarchate.; sent2 & sent5 -> int7: the father does not arrive father.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the father is a kind of a reliquary that does arrive patriarchate.; int8 -> int9: the father is a reliquary.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the immortelle is not traditional.; int11 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__