that that the riding does not occur leads to that the bath happens or the accordantness happens or both is false.
sent1: that the accordantness does not occur is incorrect if the overproduction occurs. sent2: if the riding happens that either the bath or the accordantness or both occurs is right. sent3: the Sothoness happens. sent4: the vesiculating happens. sent5: the renewableness occurs. sent6: the malpractice occurs and the pandiculation occurs. sent7: the cursorialness and/or the nesting raccoon occurs. sent8: the recapitulation and the planetariness happens. sent9: the flashing occurs. sent10: the liveliness and/or the incestuousness happens if the fact that the lacustrineness does not occur hold. sent11: the tragicomicness occurs and/or the studding antineutrino occurs. sent12: if the tie occurs the causing hyperthyroidism happens. sent13: the following happens and/or the thermocautery occurs. sent14: the causing hyperthyroidism yields the overproduction. sent15: if the fact that the wildfire occurs is correct the syncreticness happens. sent16: that the riding does not occur prevents that the vesiculating does not occur. sent17: that the deformationalness does not occur yields that the heterosexual and the proliferating occurs. sent18: that both the tying and the vesiculating occurs is caused by that the riding does not occur. sent19: the studding SALT occurs. sent20: if the thermocautery occurs then the death happens. sent21: if the riding happens the tie occurs and the vesiculating occurs. sent22: the fact that the surveying occurs is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the riding does not occur.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: both the tie and the vesiculating happens.; int1 -> int2: the tie happens.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the causing hyperthyroidism occurs.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the overproduction happens.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the accordantness occurs.; int5 -> int6: either the bath happens or the accordantness occurs or both.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the riding does not occur leads to that the bath happens or the accordantness happens or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: that the accordantness does not occur is incorrect if the overproduction occurs. sent2: if the riding happens that either the bath or the accordantness or both occurs is right. sent3: the Sothoness happens. sent4: the vesiculating happens. sent5: the renewableness occurs. sent6: the malpractice occurs and the pandiculation occurs. sent7: the cursorialness and/or the nesting raccoon occurs. sent8: the recapitulation and the planetariness happens. sent9: the flashing occurs. sent10: the liveliness and/or the incestuousness happens if the fact that the lacustrineness does not occur hold. sent11: the tragicomicness occurs and/or the studding antineutrino occurs. sent12: if the tie occurs the causing hyperthyroidism happens. sent13: the following happens and/or the thermocautery occurs. sent14: the causing hyperthyroidism yields the overproduction. sent15: if the fact that the wildfire occurs is correct the syncreticness happens. sent16: that the riding does not occur prevents that the vesiculating does not occur. sent17: that the deformationalness does not occur yields that the heterosexual and the proliferating occurs. sent18: that both the tying and the vesiculating occurs is caused by that the riding does not occur. sent19: the studding SALT occurs. sent20: if the thermocautery occurs then the death happens. sent21: if the riding happens the tie occurs and the vesiculating occurs. sent22: the fact that the surveying occurs is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the riding does not occur.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: both the tie and the vesiculating happens.; int1 -> int2: the tie happens.; sent12 & int2 -> int3: the causing hyperthyroidism occurs.; sent14 & int3 -> int4: the overproduction happens.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the accordantness occurs.; int5 -> int6: either the bath happens or the accordantness occurs or both.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__