the fact that both the viziership and the hazing litterbin happens is not correct.
sent1: the non-diabaticness results in that the dockage happens and the marshaling occurs. sent2: the nonaddictiveness and the anemophilousness occurs. sent3: the diabaticness does not occur if that either the anemophilousness does not occur or the maxillofacialness does not occur or both does not hold. sent4: if that the adoptiveness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the non-anemophilousness and/or the non-maxillofacialness happens does not hold. sent5: the viziership and the thermoelectricity happens. sent6: not the dockage but the hazing dowdy occurs. sent7: that the offstageness does not occur or the non-nonrandomness or both is caused by that the phasing does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the adoptiveness does not occur is not incorrect then the maxillofacialness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that both the diabaticness and the anemophilousness happens is not true the dockage does not occur. sent10: if that the solemnizing conessi does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the hazing litterbin does not occur and the hazing dowdy happens is not correct. sent11: the hazing dowdy occurs. sent12: that the phase does not occur is brought about by that the certainness happens. sent13: the actioning occurs. sent14: the teasing errancy or the comedown or both happens. sent15: the thermoelectricity occurs. sent16: if not the dockage but the hazing dowdy occurs the hazing litterbin occurs. sent17: if that the thermoelectricity does not occur is not incorrect then that both the viziership and the hazing litterbin happens is not correct. sent18: that the communications occurs and the viziership occurs is brought about by that the thermoelectricity does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the viziership occurs is not false.; sent16 & sent6 -> int2: the hazing litterbin occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that both the viziership and the hazing litterbin occurs is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the viziership and the hazing litterbin happens is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-diabaticness results in that the dockage happens and the marshaling occurs. sent2: the nonaddictiveness and the anemophilousness occurs. sent3: the diabaticness does not occur if that either the anemophilousness does not occur or the maxillofacialness does not occur or both does not hold. sent4: if that the adoptiveness does not occur is not incorrect the fact that the non-anemophilousness and/or the non-maxillofacialness happens does not hold. sent5: the viziership and the thermoelectricity happens. sent6: not the dockage but the hazing dowdy occurs. sent7: that the offstageness does not occur or the non-nonrandomness or both is caused by that the phasing does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the adoptiveness does not occur is not incorrect then the maxillofacialness does not occur. sent9: if the fact that both the diabaticness and the anemophilousness happens is not true the dockage does not occur. sent10: if that the solemnizing conessi does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the hazing litterbin does not occur and the hazing dowdy happens is not correct. sent11: the hazing dowdy occurs. sent12: that the phase does not occur is brought about by that the certainness happens. sent13: the actioning occurs. sent14: the teasing errancy or the comedown or both happens. sent15: the thermoelectricity occurs. sent16: if not the dockage but the hazing dowdy occurs the hazing litterbin occurs. sent17: if that the thermoelectricity does not occur is not incorrect then that both the viziership and the hazing litterbin happens is not correct. sent18: that the communications occurs and the viziership occurs is brought about by that the thermoelectricity does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the viziership occurs is not false.; sent16 & sent6 -> int2: the hazing litterbin occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__