the dwarfing mileage happens.
sent1: the fluoroscopy occurs if the waltz happens but the interfering gust does not occur. sent2: the non-farness or that the broadside occurs or both results in that the exigency does not occur. sent3: the proximateness occurs if the exigency does not occur. sent4: the interfering hesitance and the lightening occurs. sent5: the escorting waist occurs. sent6: the interfering scraper and the non-neuroanatomicness occurs. sent7: the substituting occurs. sent8: the waltzing happens. sent9: if the lightening happens the waltzing occurs and the interfering gust does not occur. sent10: that the fluoroscopy occurs and the proximateness occurs prevents the dwarfing mileage. sent11: the non-farness and/or the broadsiding happens. sent12: the bush does not occur. sent13: if the lightening happens the waltz occurs. sent14: that the exigency occurs is prevented by the non-farness. sent15: both the interfering hesitance and the dwarfing mileage occurs if that the lightening does not occur is correct. sent16: either the farness happens or the broadside occurs or both. sent17: the interfering hesitance happens. sent18: that the interfering hesitance happens and the intensiveness happens is triggered by that the lightening does not occur.
sent4 -> int1: that the lightening occurs is not wrong.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the waltz but not the interfering gust happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the fluoroscopy occurs hold.; sent2 & sent11 -> int4: the exigency does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the proximateness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fluoroscopy happens and the proximateness happens.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the dwarfing mileage occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the dwarfing mileage happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fluoroscopy occurs if the waltz happens but the interfering gust does not occur. sent2: the non-farness or that the broadside occurs or both results in that the exigency does not occur. sent3: the proximateness occurs if the exigency does not occur. sent4: the interfering hesitance and the lightening occurs. sent5: the escorting waist occurs. sent6: the interfering scraper and the non-neuroanatomicness occurs. sent7: the substituting occurs. sent8: the waltzing happens. sent9: if the lightening happens the waltzing occurs and the interfering gust does not occur. sent10: that the fluoroscopy occurs and the proximateness occurs prevents the dwarfing mileage. sent11: the non-farness and/or the broadsiding happens. sent12: the bush does not occur. sent13: if the lightening happens the waltz occurs. sent14: that the exigency occurs is prevented by the non-farness. sent15: both the interfering hesitance and the dwarfing mileage occurs if that the lightening does not occur is correct. sent16: either the farness happens or the broadside occurs or both. sent17: the interfering hesitance happens. sent18: that the interfering hesitance happens and the intensiveness happens is triggered by that the lightening does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the lightening occurs is not wrong.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the waltz but not the interfering gust happens.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: that the fluoroscopy occurs hold.; sent2 & sent11 -> int4: the exigency does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the proximateness happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the fluoroscopy happens and the proximateness happens.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__