that the capsaicin is a kind of a beneficiation and it is a square-rigger does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the cytoskeleton does not nag but it is terminological is not right if that the Kurdistan does uplift acetaminophen is not false. sent2: the janissary is aerobic. sent3: the sunrise is non-arthralgic and is a lander if the cynic is not a kind of a lander. sent4: the capsaicin is not archival if there is something such that that it is not a square-rigger and it is archival does not hold. sent5: the sunrise is not archival if the cynic is not a tenpins. sent6: if the cynic is arthralgic then the sunrise is arthralgic. sent7: the cynic is not arthralgic. sent8: the cynic is not a square-rigger if the fact that the sunrise is a kind of a tenpins that is arthralgic does not hold. sent9: if the janissary is aerobic then the Kurdistan uplifts acetaminophen. sent10: the sunrise is a lander if the fact that it is archival and is a tenpins is right. sent11: if the sunrise is not terminological the fact that it is archival and it is a lander is not right. sent12: if that the cytoskeleton does not nag and is not non-terminological does not hold then it is not a beneficiation. sent13: the capsaicin is a beneficiation if the sunrise is a lander. sent14: something nags. sent15: the sunrise is not archival. sent16: the capsaicin is a square-rigger. sent17: the sunrise is not archival and is a kind of a tenpins if the cynic is not a tenpins. sent18: that the Benzedrine is not a square-rigger but it is archival is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a beneficiation. sent19: the sunrise is not archival and is arthralgic. sent20: the cynic is a perfectibility and is a beneficiation. sent21: the sunrise is a lander if it is both not archival and a tenpins. sent22: if the cynic is not arthralgic it is not a kind of a tenpins.
sent22 & sent7 -> int1: the cynic is not a tenpins.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the sunrise is not archival and is a kind of a tenpins.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the sunrise is a kind of a lander.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the capsaicin is a beneficiation.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the sunrise is arthralgic.
sent9 & sent2 -> int5: the Kurdistan uplifts acetaminophen.; sent1 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the cytoskeleton does not nag and is terminological does not hold.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the cytoskeleton is not a kind of a beneficiation.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not a beneficiation.; int8 & sent18 -> int9: the fact that the Benzedrine is not a square-rigger but it is archival is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is not a square-rigger and it is archival is not true.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the capsaicin is not archival.;
$hypothesis$ = that the capsaicin is a kind of a beneficiation and it is a square-rigger does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the cytoskeleton does not nag but it is terminological is not right if that the Kurdistan does uplift acetaminophen is not false. sent2: the janissary is aerobic. sent3: the sunrise is non-arthralgic and is a lander if the cynic is not a kind of a lander. sent4: the capsaicin is not archival if there is something such that that it is not a square-rigger and it is archival does not hold. sent5: the sunrise is not archival if the cynic is not a tenpins. sent6: if the cynic is arthralgic then the sunrise is arthralgic. sent7: the cynic is not arthralgic. sent8: the cynic is not a square-rigger if the fact that the sunrise is a kind of a tenpins that is arthralgic does not hold. sent9: if the janissary is aerobic then the Kurdistan uplifts acetaminophen. sent10: the sunrise is a lander if the fact that it is archival and is a tenpins is right. sent11: if the sunrise is not terminological the fact that it is archival and it is a lander is not right. sent12: if that the cytoskeleton does not nag and is not non-terminological does not hold then it is not a beneficiation. sent13: the capsaicin is a beneficiation if the sunrise is a lander. sent14: something nags. sent15: the sunrise is not archival. sent16: the capsaicin is a square-rigger. sent17: the sunrise is not archival and is a kind of a tenpins if the cynic is not a tenpins. sent18: that the Benzedrine is not a square-rigger but it is archival is not correct if there exists something such that it is not a beneficiation. sent19: the sunrise is not archival and is arthralgic. sent20: the cynic is a perfectibility and is a beneficiation. sent21: the sunrise is a lander if it is both not archival and a tenpins. sent22: if the cynic is not arthralgic it is not a kind of a tenpins. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent7 -> int1: the cynic is not a tenpins.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the sunrise is not archival and is a kind of a tenpins.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the sunrise is a kind of a lander.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the capsaicin is a beneficiation.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__