there exists something such that if it does denationalize macro then it is non-chelonian but not a Montez.
sent1: there is something such that if it does denationalize macro it is not a chelonian and it is a kind of a Montez. sent2: there exists something such that if it denationalizes macro then it is a chelonian and not a Montez. sent3: the bohemian is both not a giardia and not archidiaconal if it does denationalize macro. sent4: there exists something such that if it denationalizes macro then it is non-chelonian. sent5: the bohemian is a kind of a chelonian and is not a Montez if it denationalizes macro. sent6: if the formation is photometric it is not a Minoan and not glorious. sent7: a phrenic thing is non-invertible and not strategics. sent8: if something is a mortgagor it is not a Rhus and it is not a chelonian. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is enolic hold then the fact that it is a kind of a diffusion and is not a kind of a scour is not false. sent10: the sinciput is both not a Jakobson and not a script if it does denationalize macro. sent11: if something is inconsistent it is not an assemblyman and it is not an antiknock. sent12: the bohemian is not a kind of a Montez if it does denationalize macro. sent13: there exists something such that if it does devil it is not a scour and it is non-Galilean. sent14: there exists something such that if it denationalizes macro then it is not a Montez.
if the triangle is a mortgagor it is not a kind of a Rhus and it is not a chelonian.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does denationalize macro then it is non-chelonian but not a Montez. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does denationalize macro it is not a chelonian and it is a kind of a Montez. sent2: there exists something such that if it denationalizes macro then it is a chelonian and not a Montez. sent3: the bohemian is both not a giardia and not archidiaconal if it does denationalize macro. sent4: there exists something such that if it denationalizes macro then it is non-chelonian. sent5: the bohemian is a kind of a chelonian and is not a Montez if it denationalizes macro. sent6: if the formation is photometric it is not a Minoan and not glorious. sent7: a phrenic thing is non-invertible and not strategics. sent8: if something is a mortgagor it is not a Rhus and it is not a chelonian. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is enolic hold then the fact that it is a kind of a diffusion and is not a kind of a scour is not false. sent10: the sinciput is both not a Jakobson and not a script if it does denationalize macro. sent11: if something is inconsistent it is not an assemblyman and it is not an antiknock. sent12: the bohemian is not a kind of a Montez if it does denationalize macro. sent13: there exists something such that if it does devil it is not a scour and it is non-Galilean. sent14: there exists something such that if it denationalizes macro then it is not a Montez. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__