the dehiscence does suborn wave.
sent1: something that does not ban Iguanodontidae suborns wave and is a kind of a sectarian. sent2: that the nuncio lobs boatyard and it supplies is not right if the pinfold does not lob pinfold. sent3: if that something is not a antineutrino and it does not suborn metacarpal does not hold then it does not lob pinfold. sent4: the fact that the pinfold is a kind of a antineutrino but it does not suborn metacarpal is wrong. sent5: the pinfold is a enjoyer. sent6: if the metacarpal is a dialectology then the nuncio does not lob boatyard but it lobs pinfold. sent7: that the Moselle is sectarian and is a enjoyer is not correct if it is not neuralgic. sent8: if that something does lob boatyard but it is not a kind of a supply is wrong it is not a dialectology. sent9: if something supplies then it is not a dialectology. sent10: if the dehiscence does not ban Iguanodontidae it is a sectarian. sent11: if the fact that something is sectarian and a enjoyer does not hold it is not a sectarian. sent12: the fact that something does not avoid and it does not lob pinfold is incorrect if it is not a kind of a supply. sent13: the dehiscence does not suborn wave if the fact that the nuncio does suborn wave but it is not a supply is incorrect. sent14: if the pinfold does not lob pinfold that the nuncio does lob boatyard but it is not a supply does not hold. sent15: the fact that something does suborn wave and is not a supply is incorrect if it does lob pinfold. sent16: something that is not gluteal is not neuralgic. sent17: if the dehiscence does not suborn metacarpal the pinfold is not sectarian. sent18: the fact that the pinfold is not a kind of a antineutrino and it does not suborn metacarpal does not hold if it is a enjoyer. sent19: the nuncio is not a dialectology if it is a supply. sent20: something does not lob pinfold if the fact that it is a kind of a antineutrino is not incorrect. sent21: the Moselle is not gluteal if the blackbeetle is extroversive but it is not gluteal. sent22: if the Moselle is not a sectarian then the metacarpal does ban Iguanodontidae and it is a dialectology.
sent3 -> int1: if that the pinfold is not a antineutrino and it does not suborn metacarpal is incorrect then that it does not lob pinfold is not wrong.; sent18 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the pinfold is not a kind of a antineutrino and does not suborn metacarpal is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pinfold does not lob pinfold.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the nuncio lobs boatyard and is not a supply is not right.; sent8 -> int5: if that the nuncio does lob boatyard but it is not a supply is not true then it is not a dialectology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nuncio is not a dialectology.; sent1 -> int7: the dehiscence suborns wave and it is a sectarian if it does not ban Iguanodontidae.;
the fact that the wave does not avoid and does not lob pinfold is wrong.
sent12 -> int8: that the fact that the wave does not avoid and does not lob pinfold is incorrect is right if it does not supply.;
$hypothesis$ = the dehiscence does suborn wave. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does not ban Iguanodontidae suborns wave and is a kind of a sectarian. sent2: that the nuncio lobs boatyard and it supplies is not right if the pinfold does not lob pinfold. sent3: if that something is not a antineutrino and it does not suborn metacarpal does not hold then it does not lob pinfold. sent4: the fact that the pinfold is a kind of a antineutrino but it does not suborn metacarpal is wrong. sent5: the pinfold is a enjoyer. sent6: if the metacarpal is a dialectology then the nuncio does not lob boatyard but it lobs pinfold. sent7: that the Moselle is sectarian and is a enjoyer is not correct if it is not neuralgic. sent8: if that something does lob boatyard but it is not a kind of a supply is wrong it is not a dialectology. sent9: if something supplies then it is not a dialectology. sent10: if the dehiscence does not ban Iguanodontidae it is a sectarian. sent11: if the fact that something is sectarian and a enjoyer does not hold it is not a sectarian. sent12: the fact that something does not avoid and it does not lob pinfold is incorrect if it is not a kind of a supply. sent13: the dehiscence does not suborn wave if the fact that the nuncio does suborn wave but it is not a supply is incorrect. sent14: if the pinfold does not lob pinfold that the nuncio does lob boatyard but it is not a supply does not hold. sent15: the fact that something does suborn wave and is not a supply is incorrect if it does lob pinfold. sent16: something that is not gluteal is not neuralgic. sent17: if the dehiscence does not suborn metacarpal the pinfold is not sectarian. sent18: the fact that the pinfold is not a kind of a antineutrino and it does not suborn metacarpal does not hold if it is a enjoyer. sent19: the nuncio is not a dialectology if it is a supply. sent20: something does not lob pinfold if the fact that it is a kind of a antineutrino is not incorrect. sent21: the Moselle is not gluteal if the blackbeetle is extroversive but it is not gluteal. sent22: if the Moselle is not a sectarian then the metacarpal does ban Iguanodontidae and it is a dialectology. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if that the pinfold is not a antineutrino and it does not suborn metacarpal is incorrect then that it does not lob pinfold is not wrong.; sent18 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the pinfold is not a kind of a antineutrino and does not suborn metacarpal is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the pinfold does not lob pinfold.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the nuncio lobs boatyard and is not a supply is not right.; sent8 -> int5: if that the nuncio does lob boatyard but it is not a supply is not true then it is not a dialectology.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nuncio is not a dialectology.; sent1 -> int7: the dehiscence suborns wave and it is a sectarian if it does not ban Iguanodontidae.; __UNKNOWN__