the studding hoydenism and the newsness occurs.
sent1: if the flashflood does not occur then that the studding hoydenism happens and the newsness happens is not true. sent2: the sweetening happens if the lobarness does not occur. sent3: the newsness occurs if the inspiration does not occur. sent4: if the newsness does not occur then the salientness happens or the studding hoydenism occurs or both. sent5: if the lobarness does not occur then the sweetening and the quitting occurs. sent6: if the Hadith occurs the nesting rutherford occurs or the inspiration happens or both. sent7: the disappointment occurs. sent8: the quitting does not occur if the neglecting Megadermatidae happens and the pause happens. sent9: the neglecting sanicle does not occur if the pause does not occur. sent10: that the studding hoydenism happens is triggered by that the salientness happens but the neglecting sanicle does not occur. sent11: the fact that the sweetening happens is not incorrect. sent12: if the sweetening does not occur then the newsness does not occur. sent13: that the sweetening does not occur yields that the neglecting sanicle happens and the salientness happens. sent14: that the nesting rutherford happens and/or that the inspiration does not occur is caused by that the Hadith occurs. sent15: the two-piece happens. sent16: if the neglecting Megadermatidae does not occur then the fact that the flashflood happens but the pausing does not occur is not true. sent17: both the salientness and the two-pieceness occurs. sent18: the flashflood happens. sent19: if the depersonalization does not occur the calycealness and the dimness happens. sent20: the fact that if the neglecting sanicle happens then the fact that the pause does not occur and the quitting does not occur does not hold is correct. sent21: that the nursing happens and/or the adrenalectomy does not occur brings about that the stocking occurs. sent22: the fact that the fact that the lobarness occurs is not incorrect is not right. sent23: the geometricness and the unintelligentness occurs. sent24: that the nesting rutherford happens or the inspiration does not occur or both prevents that the newsness does not occur. sent25: the hold and the fluff occurs. sent26: the flashflood happens and the neglecting Megadermatidae happens. sent27: if the underpayment does not occur then the neglecting Lipscomb and the moralization happens. sent28: the nesting rutherford happens and/or the inspiration occurs. sent29: the nesting Chandler happens.
sent26 -> int1: the fact that the neglecting Megadermatidae occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pausing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neglecting Megadermatidae and the pausing occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the quitting does not occur.; sent5 & sent22 -> int4: the sweetening occurs and the quitting happens.; int4 -> int5: the quitting occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the pausing does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the neglecting sanicle does not occur.; sent17 -> int9: the fact that the salientness happens hold.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the salient happens but the neglecting sanicle does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the studding hoydenism occurs.;
the Kenyanness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the studding hoydenism and the newsness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the flashflood does not occur then that the studding hoydenism happens and the newsness happens is not true. sent2: the sweetening happens if the lobarness does not occur. sent3: the newsness occurs if the inspiration does not occur. sent4: if the newsness does not occur then the salientness happens or the studding hoydenism occurs or both. sent5: if the lobarness does not occur then the sweetening and the quitting occurs. sent6: if the Hadith occurs the nesting rutherford occurs or the inspiration happens or both. sent7: the disappointment occurs. sent8: the quitting does not occur if the neglecting Megadermatidae happens and the pause happens. sent9: the neglecting sanicle does not occur if the pause does not occur. sent10: that the studding hoydenism happens is triggered by that the salientness happens but the neglecting sanicle does not occur. sent11: the fact that the sweetening happens is not incorrect. sent12: if the sweetening does not occur then the newsness does not occur. sent13: that the sweetening does not occur yields that the neglecting sanicle happens and the salientness happens. sent14: that the nesting rutherford happens and/or that the inspiration does not occur is caused by that the Hadith occurs. sent15: the two-piece happens. sent16: if the neglecting Megadermatidae does not occur then the fact that the flashflood happens but the pausing does not occur is not true. sent17: both the salientness and the two-pieceness occurs. sent18: the flashflood happens. sent19: if the depersonalization does not occur the calycealness and the dimness happens. sent20: the fact that if the neglecting sanicle happens then the fact that the pause does not occur and the quitting does not occur does not hold is correct. sent21: that the nursing happens and/or the adrenalectomy does not occur brings about that the stocking occurs. sent22: the fact that the fact that the lobarness occurs is not incorrect is not right. sent23: the geometricness and the unintelligentness occurs. sent24: that the nesting rutherford happens or the inspiration does not occur or both prevents that the newsness does not occur. sent25: the hold and the fluff occurs. sent26: the flashflood happens and the neglecting Megadermatidae happens. sent27: if the underpayment does not occur then the neglecting Lipscomb and the moralization happens. sent28: the nesting rutherford happens and/or the inspiration occurs. sent29: the nesting Chandler happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 -> int1: the fact that the neglecting Megadermatidae occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pausing happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the neglecting Megadermatidae and the pausing occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the quitting does not occur.; sent5 & sent22 -> int4: the sweetening occurs and the quitting happens.; int4 -> int5: the quitting occurs.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the pausing does not occur.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the neglecting sanicle does not occur.; sent17 -> int9: the fact that the salientness happens hold.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the salient happens but the neglecting sanicle does not occur.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the studding hoydenism occurs.; __UNKNOWN__