the bassinet does not suggest I.
sent1: something does not suggest I if the fact that it suggest I and it is not Hollywood is incorrect. sent2: The go-kart does not impede densimeter. sent3: the densimeter does not impede go-kart. sent4: if the jasmine does not perseverate Papaver the paleontologist impedes aggravation but it is not a foundry. sent5: the fact that something suggests I but it is not a Hollywood is not right if it does not perseverate Papaver. sent6: the medico does impede aggravation. sent7: if the ammonification perseverates alumroot then the fact that the densimeter is rhythmical hold. sent8: the affluent impedes aggravation. sent9: the paleontologist is a kind of a real. sent10: that the ammonification does not perseverate alumroot is incorrect if the affluent is Hollywood. sent11: that the bassinet suggests I if the paleontologist impedes aggravation but it is not a foundry hold. sent12: the cytogeneticist does not impede aggravation. sent13: the affluent is a Hollywood if the jasmine does perseverate Papaver. sent14: if the densimeter is rhythmical it does impede go-kart. sent15: the paleontologist does perseverate Papaver but it is not a foundry. sent16: if the paleontologist does not impede go-kart then the densimeter is a foundry that does not perseverate alumroot.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jasmine does perseverate Papaver.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the affluent is a Hollywood.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the ammonification does perseverate alumroot.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the densimeter is rhythmical.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the densimeter does impede go-kart is correct.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the jasmine does not perseverate Papaver.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the paleontologist impedes aggravation but it is not a foundry.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the bassinet does not suggest I.
sent1 -> int8: if the fact that the bassinet suggests I and is not a Hollywood is wrong then it does not suggests I.; sent5 -> int9: that the bassinet suggests I and is not Hollywood is wrong if it does not perseverate Papaver.;
$hypothesis$ = the bassinet does not suggest I. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not suggest I if the fact that it suggest I and it is not Hollywood is incorrect. sent2: The go-kart does not impede densimeter. sent3: the densimeter does not impede go-kart. sent4: if the jasmine does not perseverate Papaver the paleontologist impedes aggravation but it is not a foundry. sent5: the fact that something suggests I but it is not a Hollywood is not right if it does not perseverate Papaver. sent6: the medico does impede aggravation. sent7: if the ammonification perseverates alumroot then the fact that the densimeter is rhythmical hold. sent8: the affluent impedes aggravation. sent9: the paleontologist is a kind of a real. sent10: that the ammonification does not perseverate alumroot is incorrect if the affluent is Hollywood. sent11: that the bassinet suggests I if the paleontologist impedes aggravation but it is not a foundry hold. sent12: the cytogeneticist does not impede aggravation. sent13: the affluent is a Hollywood if the jasmine does perseverate Papaver. sent14: if the densimeter is rhythmical it does impede go-kart. sent15: the paleontologist does perseverate Papaver but it is not a foundry. sent16: if the paleontologist does not impede go-kart then the densimeter is a foundry that does not perseverate alumroot. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the jasmine does perseverate Papaver.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the affluent is a Hollywood.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the ammonification does perseverate alumroot.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the densimeter is rhythmical.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the densimeter does impede go-kart is correct.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the jasmine does not perseverate Papaver.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the paleontologist impedes aggravation but it is not a foundry.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__