the hypocrite does not overturn denizen and is homostylous.
sent1: the berk does not play marrow and is not an oscillation. sent2: The denizen does not overturn hypocrite. sent3: the fact that the tread-softly inflates dartboard is not incorrect if the berk does not play marrow and it is not an oscillation. sent4: the hypocrite is a dacoity if the tread-softly does inflate dartboard. sent5: the hypocrite does not overturn denizen. sent6: if the hypocrite is a dacoity then it is homostylous.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the tread-softly does inflate dartboard.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the hypocrite is a dacoity.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the hypocrite is homostylous.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the hypocrite does not overturn denizen and is homostylous. ; $context$ = sent1: the berk does not play marrow and is not an oscillation. sent2: The denizen does not overturn hypocrite. sent3: the fact that the tread-softly inflates dartboard is not incorrect if the berk does not play marrow and it is not an oscillation. sent4: the hypocrite is a dacoity if the tread-softly does inflate dartboard. sent5: the hypocrite does not overturn denizen. sent6: if the hypocrite is a dacoity then it is homostylous. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the tread-softly does inflate dartboard.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the hypocrite is a dacoity.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the hypocrite is homostylous.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__