the fetter is not a endospore.
sent1: if the ace is not a IPO the fact that the rasp does not fool permissibility is true. sent2: the greenmarket is a Anacyclus but not tetrametric. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a Brummell but it is not a flesh is not right if it is a endospore. sent4: if the fetter is not a kind of a endospore the rasp is not a kind of a IPO. sent5: the fact that the fact that the ace does fool permissibility and/or is a IPO does not hold is correct if the rasp is not a IPO. sent6: if the ace is a Anacyclus but not tetrametric then the rasp is not a Anacyclus. sent7: the ace is not tetrametric if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a pyinma and it is an irregular does not hold. sent8: the fact that the greenmarket is not a kind of a pyinma but it is irregular does not hold. sent9: the marc is a kind of a endospore if the fetter is a IPO. sent10: something is not a Anacyclus and is a IPO if it does fool permissibility. sent11: if that the ace either does fool permissibility or is a kind of a IPO or both does not hold then it is not a kind of a Anacyclus. sent12: if the rasp is not a Anacyclus and is a endospore then the fetter is not a kind of a endospore. sent13: the rasp fools permissibility and is a IPO if it does not fool Chondrus. sent14: if the ace is not a Anacyclus then that the fact that the greenmarket is a Anacyclus but it is not tetrametric does not hold is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fetter is not a kind of a endospore.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the rasp is not a IPO.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that either the ace does fool permissibility or it is a kind of a IPO or both is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the ace is not a Anacyclus.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the greenmarket is a kind of a Anacyclus that is not tetrametric is incorrect.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the marc is a kind of a Brummell but it is not a flesh is wrong.
sent3 -> int6: that that the marc is a Brummell and is not a flesh hold does not hold if it is a endospore.; sent10 -> int7: the fetter is not a kind of a Anacyclus but it is a kind of a IPO if it fools permissibility.;
$hypothesis$ = the fetter is not a endospore. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ace is not a IPO the fact that the rasp does not fool permissibility is true. sent2: the greenmarket is a Anacyclus but not tetrametric. sent3: the fact that something is a kind of a Brummell but it is not a flesh is not right if it is a endospore. sent4: if the fetter is not a kind of a endospore the rasp is not a kind of a IPO. sent5: the fact that the fact that the ace does fool permissibility and/or is a IPO does not hold is correct if the rasp is not a IPO. sent6: if the ace is a Anacyclus but not tetrametric then the rasp is not a Anacyclus. sent7: the ace is not tetrametric if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a pyinma and it is an irregular does not hold. sent8: the fact that the greenmarket is not a kind of a pyinma but it is irregular does not hold. sent9: the marc is a kind of a endospore if the fetter is a IPO. sent10: something is not a Anacyclus and is a IPO if it does fool permissibility. sent11: if that the ace either does fool permissibility or is a kind of a IPO or both does not hold then it is not a kind of a Anacyclus. sent12: if the rasp is not a Anacyclus and is a endospore then the fetter is not a kind of a endospore. sent13: the rasp fools permissibility and is a IPO if it does not fool Chondrus. sent14: if the ace is not a Anacyclus then that the fact that the greenmarket is a Anacyclus but it is not tetrametric does not hold is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fetter is not a kind of a endospore.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the rasp is not a IPO.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that either the ace does fool permissibility or it is a kind of a IPO or both is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the ace is not a Anacyclus.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: that the greenmarket is a kind of a Anacyclus that is not tetrametric is incorrect.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__