that the windbreak does strain friendly and/or it is biological does not hold.
sent1: if something that is a VHF does rekindle Kwa it is not biological. sent2: if something is a kind of a cordite and is not a taps it does not ensconce. sent3: if the amaranth does not ensconce then the fact that the windbreak does strain friendly and/or is biological is false. sent4: everything is a VHF and it is clerical. sent5: if the windbreak is not aphanitic the amaranth does strain friendly. sent6: there exists something such that it does not ensconce. sent7: the fact that the lector does not rekindle Kwa is not incorrect if that it is not a VHF and it rekindle Kwa is wrong. sent8: if something is not a cordite or it is not a taps or both then it does rekindle Kwa. sent9: that either the amaranth is not a kind of a cordite or it is not a taps or both if there exists something such that it does not ensconce is right. sent10: the fact that the lector is not a VHF but it does rekindle Kwa is not correct if it is not aphanitic. sent11: if the amaranth is not biological then the windbreak is biological and is aphanitic.
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: the amaranth is not a cordite or not a taps or both.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the amaranth does rekindle Kwa is not wrong if it is not a cordite or not a taps or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the amaranth rekindles Kwa.; sent4 -> int4: the amaranth is both a VHF and clerical.; int4 -> int5: the amaranth is a VHF.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the amaranth is a VHF and it rekindles Kwa.; sent1 -> int7: the amaranth is not biological if it is a VHF and it does rekindle Kwa.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the amaranth is not biological.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the windbreak is biological and it is aphanitic.; int9 -> int10: the windbreak is biological.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the windbreak does strain friendly and/or it is biological is false.
sent2 -> int11: the amaranth does not ensconce if it is a kind of a cordite and it is not a taps.;
$hypothesis$ = that the windbreak does strain friendly and/or it is biological does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is a VHF does rekindle Kwa it is not biological. sent2: if something is a kind of a cordite and is not a taps it does not ensconce. sent3: if the amaranth does not ensconce then the fact that the windbreak does strain friendly and/or is biological is false. sent4: everything is a VHF and it is clerical. sent5: if the windbreak is not aphanitic the amaranth does strain friendly. sent6: there exists something such that it does not ensconce. sent7: the fact that the lector does not rekindle Kwa is not incorrect if that it is not a VHF and it rekindle Kwa is wrong. sent8: if something is not a cordite or it is not a taps or both then it does rekindle Kwa. sent9: that either the amaranth is not a kind of a cordite or it is not a taps or both if there exists something such that it does not ensconce is right. sent10: the fact that the lector is not a VHF but it does rekindle Kwa is not correct if it is not aphanitic. sent11: if the amaranth is not biological then the windbreak is biological and is aphanitic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent9 -> int1: the amaranth is not a cordite or not a taps or both.; sent8 -> int2: the fact that the amaranth does rekindle Kwa is not wrong if it is not a cordite or not a taps or both.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the amaranth rekindles Kwa.; sent4 -> int4: the amaranth is both a VHF and clerical.; int4 -> int5: the amaranth is a VHF.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the amaranth is a VHF and it rekindles Kwa.; sent1 -> int7: the amaranth is not biological if it is a VHF and it does rekindle Kwa.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the amaranth is not biological.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the windbreak is biological and it is aphanitic.; int9 -> int10: the windbreak is biological.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__