that the fishery is not a cleanness but it is a SA is wrong.
sent1: something is not broad if it is a Lophius. sent2: if the leucine is not a Mammea then that the pentylenetetrazol is not a broad and not a Welsh is wrong. sent3: if the Congregationalist is not a Welsh and is a Mammea then the fishery eventuates. sent4: the fact that something is not a cleanness but it is a kind of a SA does not hold if it does eventuate. sent5: the Congregationalist is not a Welsh and is a Mammea if it is not a kind of a Lophius. sent6: that the Congregationalist is a broad and it is a cornstalk is true. sent7: the fishery is not a cleanness and is a SA if the kettle is not a Lophius.
sent1 -> int1: if that the Congregationalist is a Lophius is not false it is not broad.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Congregationalist is a Lophius.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Congregationalist is not a broad.; sent6 -> int3: the Congregationalist is broad.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the Congregationalist is not a Lophius is not false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Congregationalist is a kind of non-Welsh a Mammea.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fishery eventuates.; sent4 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the fishery is not a cleanness and is a SA is not false is wrong if it does eventuate.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fishery is not a cleanness and is a SA.
$hypothesis$ = that the fishery is not a cleanness but it is a SA is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not broad if it is a Lophius. sent2: if the leucine is not a Mammea then that the pentylenetetrazol is not a broad and not a Welsh is wrong. sent3: if the Congregationalist is not a Welsh and is a Mammea then the fishery eventuates. sent4: the fact that something is not a cleanness but it is a kind of a SA does not hold if it does eventuate. sent5: the Congregationalist is not a Welsh and is a Mammea if it is not a kind of a Lophius. sent6: that the Congregationalist is a broad and it is a cornstalk is true. sent7: the fishery is not a cleanness and is a SA if the kettle is not a Lophius. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if that the Congregationalist is a Lophius is not false it is not broad.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Congregationalist is a Lophius.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Congregationalist is not a broad.; sent6 -> int3: the Congregationalist is broad.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the Congregationalist is not a Lophius is not false.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the Congregationalist is a kind of non-Welsh a Mammea.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the fishery eventuates.; sent4 -> int8: the fact that the fact that the fishery is not a cleanness and is a SA is not false is wrong if it does eventuate.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__