the lymphoblast is formal.
sent1: if the ostiole is Egyptian thing that does coo Chlamyphorus then the lymphoblast is a kind of a formal. sent2: if something does not gate flap it is not Egyptian. sent3: if something is a kind of a thimble or it fuels or both it is not a kind of a continence. sent4: the ostiole is not a Egyptian. sent5: if something does rib inventiveness the plenum is a Hyoscyamus or a buck or both. sent6: the ostiole does not gate flap if the fact that the strainer does not gate actinium is true. sent7: something does rib inventiveness. sent8: if the ostiole is not a Egyptian and does coo Chlamyphorus then the lymphoblast is not informal. sent9: if the ostiole does not gate flap it is not a Egyptian. sent10: if something does not gate flap then it is not a Egyptian and coos Chlamyphorus. sent11: the plenum does not gate actinium if it is a Hyoscyamus. sent12: the strainer is non-formal thing that gates actinium. sent13: a Hyoscyamus does not gate actinium. sent14: that something is not a buck if the fact that it is a kind of a buck that does gate actinium is not true is correct. sent15: something does not gate actinium if it is a Hyoscyamus and/or it is a buck. sent16: that something is a kind of a buck that gates actinium does not hold if it is not granuliferous. sent17: the fact that the strainer gates actinium and is granuliferous does not hold if the plenum does not gates actinium.
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the plenum is a kind of a Hyoscyamus or it does buck or both.; sent15 -> int2: if the plenum is a Hyoscyamus and/or it is a buck then it does not gate actinium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plenum does not gate actinium.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the strainer does gate actinium and it is granuliferous is incorrect.; sent10 -> int5: the ostiole is not a Egyptian and coos Chlamyphorus if it does not gate flap.;
the lymphoblast is not a formal.
sent14 -> int6: the plenum does not buck if that it buck and does gate actinium is wrong.; sent16 -> int7: the fact that the strainer is a buck and gates actinium is false if it is not granuliferous.;
$hypothesis$ = the lymphoblast is formal. ; $context$ = sent1: if the ostiole is Egyptian thing that does coo Chlamyphorus then the lymphoblast is a kind of a formal. sent2: if something does not gate flap it is not Egyptian. sent3: if something is a kind of a thimble or it fuels or both it is not a kind of a continence. sent4: the ostiole is not a Egyptian. sent5: if something does rib inventiveness the plenum is a Hyoscyamus or a buck or both. sent6: the ostiole does not gate flap if the fact that the strainer does not gate actinium is true. sent7: something does rib inventiveness. sent8: if the ostiole is not a Egyptian and does coo Chlamyphorus then the lymphoblast is not informal. sent9: if the ostiole does not gate flap it is not a Egyptian. sent10: if something does not gate flap then it is not a Egyptian and coos Chlamyphorus. sent11: the plenum does not gate actinium if it is a Hyoscyamus. sent12: the strainer is non-formal thing that gates actinium. sent13: a Hyoscyamus does not gate actinium. sent14: that something is not a buck if the fact that it is a kind of a buck that does gate actinium is not true is correct. sent15: something does not gate actinium if it is a Hyoscyamus and/or it is a buck. sent16: that something is a kind of a buck that gates actinium does not hold if it is not granuliferous. sent17: the fact that the strainer gates actinium and is granuliferous does not hold if the plenum does not gates actinium. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent5 -> int1: the plenum is a kind of a Hyoscyamus or it does buck or both.; sent15 -> int2: if the plenum is a Hyoscyamus and/or it is a buck then it does not gate actinium.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the plenum does not gate actinium.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the strainer does gate actinium and it is granuliferous is incorrect.; sent10 -> int5: the ostiole is not a Egyptian and coos Chlamyphorus if it does not gate flap.; __UNKNOWN__