the ghatti is not a arbovirus.
sent1: if either the ghatti is not unsurmountable or it is not a fandango or both the snood is not a kind of a arbovirus. sent2: the hemstitch is either not unsurmountable or a hematochrome or both. sent3: there exists something such that it is a meltwater. sent4: the tempestuousness is a kind of non-domiciliary thing that is nonproprietary. sent5: if the ghatti is unsurmountable that the fact that the snood is a fandango but not a arbovirus is not false is false. sent6: if the snood is surmountable or is not a fandango or both then the ghatti is not a kind of a arbovirus. sent7: the tempestuousness is a kind of non-domiciliary a arbovirus. sent8: if the Liederkranz is not a cosmetician then the ghatti is unsurmountable. sent9: that the ghatti is a arbovirus and it is a kind of a fandango if the tempestuousness is not unsurmountable is true. sent10: something is not a cosmetician if that it does not acquaint moksa and it is a cosmetician is incorrect. sent11: the fact that that the blackjack is not a kind of a Greenland and is a DO does not hold hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a meltwater. sent12: the snood is not a fandango if the tempestuousness is not nonproprietary but it is unsurmountable. sent13: the tempestuousness is not a fandango and/or it is not nonproprietary. sent14: if something is a kind of a Greenland then that it does not acquaint moksa and is a cosmetician is not correct.
the tempestuousness is not a fandango.
sent10 -> int1: if that the Liederkranz does not acquaint moksa but it is a cosmetician is incorrect it is not a cosmetician.; sent14 -> int2: the fact that the Liederkranz does not acquaint moksa but it is a cosmetician is not right if it is a kind of a Greenland.; sent3 & sent11 -> int3: that the blackjack is not a Greenland but it is a DO is not correct.; int3 -> int4: the fact that there is something such that that it is not a Greenland and is a DO does not hold hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the ghatti is not a arbovirus. ; $context$ = sent1: if either the ghatti is not unsurmountable or it is not a fandango or both the snood is not a kind of a arbovirus. sent2: the hemstitch is either not unsurmountable or a hematochrome or both. sent3: there exists something such that it is a meltwater. sent4: the tempestuousness is a kind of non-domiciliary thing that is nonproprietary. sent5: if the ghatti is unsurmountable that the fact that the snood is a fandango but not a arbovirus is not false is false. sent6: if the snood is surmountable or is not a fandango or both then the ghatti is not a kind of a arbovirus. sent7: the tempestuousness is a kind of non-domiciliary a arbovirus. sent8: if the Liederkranz is not a cosmetician then the ghatti is unsurmountable. sent9: that the ghatti is a arbovirus and it is a kind of a fandango if the tempestuousness is not unsurmountable is true. sent10: something is not a cosmetician if that it does not acquaint moksa and it is a cosmetician is incorrect. sent11: the fact that that the blackjack is not a kind of a Greenland and is a DO does not hold hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a meltwater. sent12: the snood is not a fandango if the tempestuousness is not nonproprietary but it is unsurmountable. sent13: the tempestuousness is not a fandango and/or it is not nonproprietary. sent14: if something is a kind of a Greenland then that it does not acquaint moksa and is a cosmetician is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__