if the noncyclicness does not occur that the fact that the interference happens but the iconolatry does not occur is false is correct.
sent1: the fact that the generalship happens and the converging does not occur is wrong. sent2: the fact that the interference but not the iconolatry occurs is incorrect if the noncyclicness occurs. sent3: if the fact that the noncyclicness does not occur is not incorrect the interference happens and the iconolatry does not occur. sent4: the iconolatry does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the interference happens and the iconolatry does not occur is correct.; assump2 -> int1: the interference occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = if the noncyclicness does not occur that the fact that the interference happens but the iconolatry does not occur is false is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the generalship happens and the converging does not occur is wrong. sent2: the fact that the interference but not the iconolatry occurs is incorrect if the noncyclicness occurs. sent3: if the fact that the noncyclicness does not occur is not incorrect the interference happens and the iconolatry does not occur. sent4: the iconolatry does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the interference happens and the iconolatry does not occur is correct.; assump2 -> int1: the interference occurs.; __UNKNOWN__