the fact that the podocarp is ameboid is right.
sent1: the fact that something does not protest migraine but it protests activity is false if it is wetting. sent2: the trident is a dissertation. sent3: if the fact that something does not protest migraine and does protest activity is not correct it is ameboid. sent4: the fact that the wit does protest migraine hold. sent5: if the hygrometer is not Texan then the podocarp wets. sent6: if the podocarp does protest migraine then that the hygrometer does wet but it does not protest activity does not hold. sent7: the hygrometer does wet if the trident is a dissertation. sent8: the wit either is a kind of a Texan or does not protest activity or both. sent9: if either the wit is a Texan or it does not protest activity or both then the hygrometer does not protest activity. sent10: the Hogg does not protest activity. sent11: if something is either not a marc or not Texan or both it is not a kind of a Texan. sent12: if the podocarp is ameboid it protests migraine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the podocarp is ameboid.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the podocarp protests migraine.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the hygrometer is wetting thing that does not protest activity does not hold.; sent7 & sent2 -> int3: the hygrometer does wet.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: that the hygrometer does not protest activity is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hygrometer is wetting thing that does not protest activity.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the podocarp is ameboid is not false.
sent3 -> int7: if that the podocarp does not protest migraine but it protests activity is incorrect it is ameboid.; sent1 -> int8: if the podocarp wets then the fact that it does not protest migraine and it does protest activity is wrong.; sent11 -> int9: if either the hygrometer is not a marc or it is not a Texan or both it is not a kind of a Texan.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the podocarp is ameboid is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not protest migraine but it protests activity is false if it is wetting. sent2: the trident is a dissertation. sent3: if the fact that something does not protest migraine and does protest activity is not correct it is ameboid. sent4: the fact that the wit does protest migraine hold. sent5: if the hygrometer is not Texan then the podocarp wets. sent6: if the podocarp does protest migraine then that the hygrometer does wet but it does not protest activity does not hold. sent7: the hygrometer does wet if the trident is a dissertation. sent8: the wit either is a kind of a Texan or does not protest activity or both. sent9: if either the wit is a Texan or it does not protest activity or both then the hygrometer does not protest activity. sent10: the Hogg does not protest activity. sent11: if something is either not a marc or not Texan or both it is not a kind of a Texan. sent12: if the podocarp is ameboid it protests migraine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the podocarp is ameboid.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the podocarp protests migraine.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the hygrometer is wetting thing that does not protest activity does not hold.; sent7 & sent2 -> int3: the hygrometer does wet.; sent9 & sent8 -> int4: that the hygrometer does not protest activity is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hygrometer is wetting thing that does not protest activity.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__