the deoxythymidine is not non-clad and not sympathetic.
sent1: if the fact that the Hereford is a kind of a browallia is true the fact that the disco is not a stateroom but it is a browallia is wrong. sent2: a glyceride is not a catch or not suppurative or both. sent3: something is instructive if it does not sentimentalise. sent4: if that the custard is not a Langmuir but it is a Lymantria is not correct then the hamate is not a kind of a Langmuir. sent5: the chanterelle is not unpredictable and it is not acervate. sent6: if something is instructive then that it does ante and it is not a browallia is not correct. sent7: the fact that the custard is not a Langmuir but it is a Lymantria is not correct if there exists something such that it is not suppurative. sent8: the applecart is non-gallinaceous if the chanterelle is predictable and not acervate. sent9: if the Hereford is not a browallia the deoxythymidine is clad thing that is unsympathetic. sent10: if the Pennsylvanian is clad the fact that the deoxythymidine is clad and is not sympathetic is not true. sent11: if something is not appellate the fact that it troops scad and is not hypertonic is false. sent12: that the Pennsylvanian is a kind of a stateroom that mistakes collagen is not right. sent13: there is nothing that does not sentimentalise and is not a stateroom. sent14: if the sportswriter is not a catch and/or is not suppurative then the HS1 is not suppurative. sent15: that the Pennsylvanian is both a browallia and clad does not hold. sent16: the Hereford is a browallia that is not instructive. sent17: if the fact that the Pennsylvanian is instructive hold then that the disco is not a browallia but it is a stateroom does not hold. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not gallinaceous then the sportswriter is a kind of a shark and is a glyceride. sent19: that the disco is both not non-clad and a stateroom is not true if the deoxythymidine is a kind of a stateroom. sent20: the Pennsylvanian is instructive. sent21: that the Hereford is a kind of a browallia and is not a kind of a stateroom is not correct. sent22: if the Pennsylvanian is clad then that the deoxythymidine is clad and it is sympathetic is incorrect. sent23: if the hamate is not a Langmuir then the converter is not appellate. sent24: the Pennsylvanian is clad if that that the disco is not a stateroom but it is a browallia is not right hold.
sent16 -> int1: the Hereford is a kind of a browallia.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the disco is not a stateroom and is a browallia is incorrect.; sent24 & int2 -> int3: the Pennsylvanian is clad.; sent10 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Pennsylvanian is an ante and is not a kind of a browallia is not correct.
sent6 -> int4: the fact that the Pennsylvanian is a kind of an ante and is not a browallia is not right if it is instructive.; sent13 -> int5: that the disco does not sentimentalise and it is not a kind of a stateroom is not true.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not sentimentalise and is not a kind of a stateroom is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the deoxythymidine is not non-clad and not sympathetic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Hereford is a kind of a browallia is true the fact that the disco is not a stateroom but it is a browallia is wrong. sent2: a glyceride is not a catch or not suppurative or both. sent3: something is instructive if it does not sentimentalise. sent4: if that the custard is not a Langmuir but it is a Lymantria is not correct then the hamate is not a kind of a Langmuir. sent5: the chanterelle is not unpredictable and it is not acervate. sent6: if something is instructive then that it does ante and it is not a browallia is not correct. sent7: the fact that the custard is not a Langmuir but it is a Lymantria is not correct if there exists something such that it is not suppurative. sent8: the applecart is non-gallinaceous if the chanterelle is predictable and not acervate. sent9: if the Hereford is not a browallia the deoxythymidine is clad thing that is unsympathetic. sent10: if the Pennsylvanian is clad the fact that the deoxythymidine is clad and is not sympathetic is not true. sent11: if something is not appellate the fact that it troops scad and is not hypertonic is false. sent12: that the Pennsylvanian is a kind of a stateroom that mistakes collagen is not right. sent13: there is nothing that does not sentimentalise and is not a stateroom. sent14: if the sportswriter is not a catch and/or is not suppurative then the HS1 is not suppurative. sent15: that the Pennsylvanian is both a browallia and clad does not hold. sent16: the Hereford is a browallia that is not instructive. sent17: if the fact that the Pennsylvanian is instructive hold then that the disco is not a browallia but it is a stateroom does not hold. sent18: if there exists something such that it is not gallinaceous then the sportswriter is a kind of a shark and is a glyceride. sent19: that the disco is both not non-clad and a stateroom is not true if the deoxythymidine is a kind of a stateroom. sent20: the Pennsylvanian is instructive. sent21: that the Hereford is a kind of a browallia and is not a kind of a stateroom is not correct. sent22: if the Pennsylvanian is clad then that the deoxythymidine is clad and it is sympathetic is incorrect. sent23: if the hamate is not a Langmuir then the converter is not appellate. sent24: the Pennsylvanian is clad if that that the disco is not a stateroom but it is a browallia is not right hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the Hereford is a kind of a browallia.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the disco is not a stateroom and is a browallia is incorrect.; sent24 & int2 -> int3: the Pennsylvanian is clad.; sent10 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__