the fact that the jitters happens is not false.
sent1: the ogling topside happens. sent2: that the jitters and the Olympicsness happens is triggered by that the recovery does not occur. sent3: the ionicness and the non-Mandaeanness occurs. sent4: if the compatibleness does not occur then the fact that both the ogling bagger and the hooking happens is not true. sent5: that the riffle does not occur and the airs occurs prevents that the recovery happens. sent6: if the recovery does not occur the Olympicsness happens. sent7: the glowing does not occur. sent8: the trophicness does not occur but the pluming occurs. sent9: the compatibleness does not occur. sent10: that the ogling bagger occurs but the hooks does not occur does not hold if the compatibleness does not occur. sent11: if the conflagration does not occur then the airs occurs and the grasping basketball happens. sent12: the conflagration does not occur if that the ogling bagger but not the hooking happens is not right. sent13: if the fact that the operation but not the centralization occurs is not true the appointiveness does not occur. sent14: the nonspecificness is prevented by that the sociologicalness occurs or that the subtilizing Umbundu occurs or both. sent15: the nonspecificness but not the ding-dong happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing Umbundu happens.; assump1 -> int1: the sociologicalness and/or the subtilizing Umbundu happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the nonspecificness does not occur.; sent15 -> int3: the nonspecificness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the subtilizing Umbundu does not occur is not wrong.; sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the ogling bagger occurs and the hooking does not occur does not hold.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the conflagration does not occur.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: both the airs and the grasping basketball occurs.; int8 -> int9: the airing happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the jitters happens is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the ogling topside happens. sent2: that the jitters and the Olympicsness happens is triggered by that the recovery does not occur. sent3: the ionicness and the non-Mandaeanness occurs. sent4: if the compatibleness does not occur then the fact that both the ogling bagger and the hooking happens is not true. sent5: that the riffle does not occur and the airs occurs prevents that the recovery happens. sent6: if the recovery does not occur the Olympicsness happens. sent7: the glowing does not occur. sent8: the trophicness does not occur but the pluming occurs. sent9: the compatibleness does not occur. sent10: that the ogling bagger occurs but the hooks does not occur does not hold if the compatibleness does not occur. sent11: if the conflagration does not occur then the airs occurs and the grasping basketball happens. sent12: the conflagration does not occur if that the ogling bagger but not the hooking happens is not right. sent13: if the fact that the operation but not the centralization occurs is not true the appointiveness does not occur. sent14: the nonspecificness is prevented by that the sociologicalness occurs or that the subtilizing Umbundu occurs or both. sent15: the nonspecificness but not the ding-dong happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the subtilizing Umbundu happens.; assump1 -> int1: the sociologicalness and/or the subtilizing Umbundu happens.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the nonspecificness does not occur.; sent15 -> int3: the nonspecificness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the subtilizing Umbundu does not occur is not wrong.; sent10 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the ogling bagger occurs and the hooking does not occur does not hold.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the conflagration does not occur.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: both the airs and the grasping basketball occurs.; int8 -> int9: the airing happens.; __UNKNOWN__