the cultivation is Polish.
sent1: the pyroelectricity is not a phagocyte but removable if the cigarette is not removable. sent2: something is non-gemmiferous. sent3: there exists something such that it is gemmiferous. sent4: if the choler does not lease Hyderabad the cigarette is not removable. sent5: if the pyroelectricity is not a kind of a phagocyte but it is not irremovable then that the cultivation does not axe Minden is not wrong. sent6: something is not removable if the fact that it encloses cigarette and is not removable is not true. sent7: if either something does not axe Minden or it shades or both then it is a Polish. sent8: if that something is gemmiferous and it is a kind of a allocution is incorrect then the fact that it is not a allocution hold. sent9: if the choler does lease Hyderabad then the interleukin is a kind of a spruce that is not a breakdown. sent10: if something is not gemmiferous then that the nightrider is a kind of gemmiferous a allocution does not hold. sent11: if the cultivation is not removable then the cigarette does not axe Minden.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choler does lease Hyderabad.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the interleukin does spruce and is not a kind of a breakdown.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that the nightrider is gemmiferous and it is a allocution is wrong the fact that it is not a allocution is correct.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the nightrider is gemmiferous thing that is a allocution is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the nightrider is not a allocution.; sent7 -> int5: if the cultivation does not axe Minden and/or is a shade it is a Polish.;
the spicebush is not removable if the fact that it does enclose cigarette and is removable is not true.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the cultivation is Polish. ; $context$ = sent1: the pyroelectricity is not a phagocyte but removable if the cigarette is not removable. sent2: something is non-gemmiferous. sent3: there exists something such that it is gemmiferous. sent4: if the choler does not lease Hyderabad the cigarette is not removable. sent5: if the pyroelectricity is not a kind of a phagocyte but it is not irremovable then that the cultivation does not axe Minden is not wrong. sent6: something is not removable if the fact that it encloses cigarette and is not removable is not true. sent7: if either something does not axe Minden or it shades or both then it is a Polish. sent8: if that something is gemmiferous and it is a kind of a allocution is incorrect then the fact that it is not a allocution hold. sent9: if the choler does lease Hyderabad then the interleukin is a kind of a spruce that is not a breakdown. sent10: if something is not gemmiferous then that the nightrider is a kind of gemmiferous a allocution does not hold. sent11: if the cultivation is not removable then the cigarette does not axe Minden. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the choler does lease Hyderabad.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the interleukin does spruce and is not a kind of a breakdown.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that the nightrider is gemmiferous and it is a allocution is wrong the fact that it is not a allocution is correct.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the nightrider is gemmiferous thing that is a allocution is wrong.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the nightrider is not a allocution.; sent7 -> int5: if the cultivation does not axe Minden and/or is a shade it is a Polish.; __UNKNOWN__