the fact that something is a kind of a isometric but it does not ladle providence is not correct.
sent1: there is something such that that it does hop gentleness and is not discordant hold. sent2: the stickpin does not ladle winger but it is a venography. sent3: something does ladle providence and it does abuse Sunni. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a kind of a printmaker or does not assimilate or both is correct does not hold the bathroom abuses Sunni. sent5: the stickpin does assimilate if that the Sunni ladles winger hold. sent6: the winger ladles providence if the bathroom abuses Sunni. sent7: if the stickpin does not ladle winger but it is a kind of a venography the Sunni does not assimilate. sent8: there is something such that the fact that either it is a venography or it does not assimilate or both is not true. sent9: if that the rhodolite does not assimilate but it is not non-isometric is not incorrect the Gemini is not a kind of a printmaker. sent10: if the stickpin does ladle winger and is a venography the Sunni does not assimilate. sent11: that the rhodolite is not a kind of a printmaker or it does not assimilate or both is incorrect if the Sunni does not assimilate. sent12: the stickpin is isometric thing that does not ladle winger if the Gemini ladle winger. sent13: something is isometric and it does ladle providence. sent14: the stickpin is not a isometric if the Gemini ladles winger and it ladles providence. sent15: if the Sunni does not assimilate then the rhodolite assimilate. sent16: the Gemini is a kind of a isometric if the winger does ladle providence. sent17: if the winger does ladle providence then the Gemini is isometric thing that does not ladle providence. sent18: the rhodolite does not ladle providence. sent19: there exists something such that that it assimilates or is not a venography or both is false. sent20: the stickpin does not ladle winger.
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the Sunni does not assimilate.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: that the rhodolite is not a kind of a printmaker and/or it does not assimilate is false.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it either is not a kind of a printmaker or does not assimilate or both is false.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the bathroom does abuse Sunni.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the winger ladles providence.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the Gemini is isometric thing that does not ladle providence.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is a kind of a isometric but it does not ladle providence is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it does hop gentleness and is not discordant hold. sent2: the stickpin does not ladle winger but it is a venography. sent3: something does ladle providence and it does abuse Sunni. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that that it is not a kind of a printmaker or does not assimilate or both is correct does not hold the bathroom abuses Sunni. sent5: the stickpin does assimilate if that the Sunni ladles winger hold. sent6: the winger ladles providence if the bathroom abuses Sunni. sent7: if the stickpin does not ladle winger but it is a kind of a venography the Sunni does not assimilate. sent8: there is something such that the fact that either it is a venography or it does not assimilate or both is not true. sent9: if that the rhodolite does not assimilate but it is not non-isometric is not incorrect the Gemini is not a kind of a printmaker. sent10: if the stickpin does ladle winger and is a venography the Sunni does not assimilate. sent11: that the rhodolite is not a kind of a printmaker or it does not assimilate or both is incorrect if the Sunni does not assimilate. sent12: the stickpin is isometric thing that does not ladle winger if the Gemini ladle winger. sent13: something is isometric and it does ladle providence. sent14: the stickpin is not a isometric if the Gemini ladles winger and it ladles providence. sent15: if the Sunni does not assimilate then the rhodolite assimilate. sent16: the Gemini is a kind of a isometric if the winger does ladle providence. sent17: if the winger does ladle providence then the Gemini is isometric thing that does not ladle providence. sent18: the rhodolite does not ladle providence. sent19: there exists something such that that it assimilates or is not a venography or both is false. sent20: the stickpin does not ladle winger. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent2 -> int1: the Sunni does not assimilate.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: that the rhodolite is not a kind of a printmaker and/or it does not assimilate is false.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it either is not a kind of a printmaker or does not assimilate or both is false.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the bathroom does abuse Sunni.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the winger ladles providence.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: the Gemini is isometric thing that does not ladle providence.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__