either the gill is not a Palmae or it is stale or both.
sent1: the gill is a Palmae and/or it stales if there is something such that it does not salt rhetoric. sent2: there exists something such that it salts rhetoric. sent3: there exists something such that it is a bridle. sent4: something does not salt rhetoric if it is a read. sent5: the anthill is not a margay. sent6: the butterfat is not a Palmae if it is a read. sent7: the butterfat is not a floored. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a bridle then the anthill is a floored. sent9: if the plunger is non-methodological the fact that the airfoil is not a kind of a read but it does counterclaim does not hold. sent10: if the plunger does not metamorphose then the fact that it is not a hypostatization and it is methodological does not hold. sent11: the butterfat does not grit if that the Hoover does salt rhetoric and is not a kind of a grit does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that it is high-interest. sent13: the butterfat does read if that the anthill is a floored and/or it is a grits is wrong. sent14: if that something does not read but it is a counterclaim is not correct then it does read. sent15: if something is a kind of a bridle the fact that the anthill is not a kind of a floored or it does grit or both is false. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not salt rhetoric is not incorrect then the gill is not a Palmae or not non-stale or both. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a Palmae. sent18: the anthill is a floored. sent19: if the airfoil is a read then the fact that the fact that the Hoover does salt rhetoric and is not a grits is not incorrect is not right. sent20: the gill is either a Palmae or stale or both. sent21: the plunger is not methodological if the fact that it is not a hypostatization but methodological is not true.
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the anthill is not a floored or it grits or both is wrong.; sent4 -> int2: the butterfat does not salt rhetoric if it does read.;
that either the gill is not a Palmae or it is stale or both is wrong.
sent14 -> int3: if the fact that the fact that the airfoil does not read and counterclaims is not incorrect is false then it is a kind of a read.;
$hypothesis$ = either the gill is not a Palmae or it is stale or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the gill is a Palmae and/or it stales if there is something such that it does not salt rhetoric. sent2: there exists something such that it salts rhetoric. sent3: there exists something such that it is a bridle. sent4: something does not salt rhetoric if it is a read. sent5: the anthill is not a margay. sent6: the butterfat is not a Palmae if it is a read. sent7: the butterfat is not a floored. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a bridle then the anthill is a floored. sent9: if the plunger is non-methodological the fact that the airfoil is not a kind of a read but it does counterclaim does not hold. sent10: if the plunger does not metamorphose then the fact that it is not a hypostatization and it is methodological does not hold. sent11: the butterfat does not grit if that the Hoover does salt rhetoric and is not a kind of a grit does not hold. sent12: there exists something such that it is high-interest. sent13: the butterfat does read if that the anthill is a floored and/or it is a grits is wrong. sent14: if that something does not read but it is a counterclaim is not correct then it does read. sent15: if something is a kind of a bridle the fact that the anthill is not a kind of a floored or it does grit or both is false. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not salt rhetoric is not incorrect then the gill is not a Palmae or not non-stale or both. sent17: there exists something such that it is not a Palmae. sent18: the anthill is a floored. sent19: if the airfoil is a read then the fact that the fact that the Hoover does salt rhetoric and is not a grits is not incorrect is not right. sent20: the gill is either a Palmae or stale or both. sent21: the plunger is not methodological if the fact that it is not a hypostatization but methodological is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: the fact that the anthill is not a floored or it grits or both is wrong.; sent4 -> int2: the butterfat does not salt rhetoric if it does read.; __UNKNOWN__