that the outfitting brings about that the paw does not occur and/or the gradating occurs does not hold.
sent1: the squared causes that the criticizing benediction does not occur and/or the upholding Anaximander. sent2: both the nonfissionableness and the pawing occurs if the knitting does not occur. sent3: the knitting does not occur if the fact that the outfitting does not occur and the gradating does not occur is correct. sent4: if the outfitting occurs the paw occurs or the gradating occurs or both. sent5: the criticizing windstorm happens. sent6: that the knitting does not occur yields that both the witching and the paw happens. sent7: the sonography does not occur and/or the alchemisticness occurs. sent8: that the finalizing lochia occurs hold if the agitating happens and the offering occurs. sent9: the knitting happens. sent10: if the paw and the knitting happens the outfitting occurs. sent11: the outfitting does not occur if the pawing happens and the knitting happens. sent12: if the rhinoscopy does not occur the outfitting does not occur and the gradating does not occur. sent13: the paw and/or the gradating happens. sent14: the distemper does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the outfitting happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pawing happens.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the pawing and the knitting happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the outfitting does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the paw does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the pawing does not occur and/or the gradating occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the nonfissionableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the outfitting brings about that the paw does not occur and/or the gradating occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the squared causes that the criticizing benediction does not occur and/or the upholding Anaximander. sent2: both the nonfissionableness and the pawing occurs if the knitting does not occur. sent3: the knitting does not occur if the fact that the outfitting does not occur and the gradating does not occur is correct. sent4: if the outfitting occurs the paw occurs or the gradating occurs or both. sent5: the criticizing windstorm happens. sent6: that the knitting does not occur yields that both the witching and the paw happens. sent7: the sonography does not occur and/or the alchemisticness occurs. sent8: that the finalizing lochia occurs hold if the agitating happens and the offering occurs. sent9: the knitting happens. sent10: if the paw and the knitting happens the outfitting occurs. sent11: the outfitting does not occur if the pawing happens and the knitting happens. sent12: if the rhinoscopy does not occur the outfitting does not occur and the gradating does not occur. sent13: the paw and/or the gradating happens. sent14: the distemper does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the outfitting happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pawing happens.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the pawing and the knitting happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the outfitting does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the paw does not occur.; int4 -> int5: the pawing does not occur and/or the gradating occurs.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__