the fact that if the decoction is not mindful then the muffler is a kind of a hydrocortisone is not true.
sent1: the fact that the Conservative is not a Beethoven is true if the hausmannite is a crankcase. sent2: if the Conservative is not a Beethoven then the muffler is a hydrocortisone. sent3: something is a crankcase if it is not powerful and it does palatalize aecium. sent4: if the fact that the Conservative is not a Beethoven and is a kind of a crankcase is not correct then the hausmannite is a hydrocortisone. sent5: something is a raster if it is not a Beethoven and it is a singular. sent6: if the fact that the hausmannite is non-powerful thing that palatalizes aecium is incorrect the fact that the decoction is not unmindful is correct. sent7: the muffler is a Beethoven if the Conservative is not a kind of a hydrocortisone. sent8: the fact that the hausmannite is not a hydrocortisone but it is a kind of a crankcase does not hold. sent9: if the Conservative is not unmindful then the fact that the decoction is a Beethoven is not false. sent10: the Conservative is not a crankcase. sent11: the fact that the muffler is not a hydrocortisone and is a kind of a crankcase does not hold. sent12: the hausmannite is a Beethoven if it is not powerful and is a kind of a crankcase. sent13: if something does not palatalize aecium but it is unmindful it is powerful. sent14: the Conservative is non-powerful if that the hausmannite is not a kind of a hydrocortisone but it is a Beethoven is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hausmannite is not powerful and palatalizes aecium is not correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the decoction is mindful.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decoction is unmindful.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hausmannite is non-powerful thing that palatalizes aecium.; sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the hausmannite is not powerful and does palatalize aecium is right it is a crankcase.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hausmannite is a crankcase.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the Conservative is not a Beethoven.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the muffler is a kind of a hydrocortisone.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the condor is a raster if it is not a Beethoven and is a singular.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the decoction is not mindful then the muffler is a kind of a hydrocortisone is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Conservative is not a Beethoven is true if the hausmannite is a crankcase. sent2: if the Conservative is not a Beethoven then the muffler is a hydrocortisone. sent3: something is a crankcase if it is not powerful and it does palatalize aecium. sent4: if the fact that the Conservative is not a Beethoven and is a kind of a crankcase is not correct then the hausmannite is a hydrocortisone. sent5: something is a raster if it is not a Beethoven and it is a singular. sent6: if the fact that the hausmannite is non-powerful thing that palatalizes aecium is incorrect the fact that the decoction is not unmindful is correct. sent7: the muffler is a Beethoven if the Conservative is not a kind of a hydrocortisone. sent8: the fact that the hausmannite is not a hydrocortisone but it is a kind of a crankcase does not hold. sent9: if the Conservative is not unmindful then the fact that the decoction is a Beethoven is not false. sent10: the Conservative is not a crankcase. sent11: the fact that the muffler is not a hydrocortisone and is a kind of a crankcase does not hold. sent12: the hausmannite is a Beethoven if it is not powerful and is a kind of a crankcase. sent13: if something does not palatalize aecium but it is unmindful it is powerful. sent14: the Conservative is non-powerful if that the hausmannite is not a kind of a hydrocortisone but it is a Beethoven is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hausmannite is not powerful and palatalizes aecium is not correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the decoction is mindful.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decoction is unmindful.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the hausmannite is non-powerful thing that palatalizes aecium.; sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the hausmannite is not powerful and does palatalize aecium is right it is a crankcase.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the hausmannite is a crankcase.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the Conservative is not a Beethoven.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the muffler is a kind of a hydrocortisone.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__