the aquamarine is not a kind of a delay.
sent1: the exposure is not a metacarpal. sent2: that if the termer is the hike the termer does not measure termer is not incorrect. sent3: if the termer does not measure termer but it remonstrates Domino then the aquamarine delays. sent4: if the termer is a hike then it does not measure termer and it does remonstrate Domino. sent5: that the aquamarine does not hike is right. sent6: if the fact that the exposure is not metacarpal is true that it is a composure and it does remonstrate SGML is wrong. sent7: the termer does hike. sent8: the termer does twirl.
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the termer does not measure termer and does remonstrate Domino.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the aquamarine does not delay.
sent6 & sent1 -> int2: that the exposure is a composure and it does remonstrate SGML is incorrect.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a composure and it remonstrates SGML is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the aquamarine is not a kind of a delay. ; $context$ = sent1: the exposure is not a metacarpal. sent2: that if the termer is the hike the termer does not measure termer is not incorrect. sent3: if the termer does not measure termer but it remonstrates Domino then the aquamarine delays. sent4: if the termer is a hike then it does not measure termer and it does remonstrate Domino. sent5: that the aquamarine does not hike is right. sent6: if the fact that the exposure is not metacarpal is true that it is a composure and it does remonstrate SGML is wrong. sent7: the termer does hike. sent8: the termer does twirl. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 -> int1: the termer does not measure termer and does remonstrate Domino.; sent3 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__