the requital occurs.
sent1: the fact that the atrophy occurs but the bark does not occur if the back-channelness does not occur is not false. sent2: the music happens and/or the carelessness occurs if the arboriculture does not occur. sent3: the requital happens if that the back-channelness does not occur and the requital does not occur is not correct. sent4: that both the salivariness and the music occurs prevents that the requital happens. sent5: the music happens if that the carelessness does not occur hold. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the fact that the patrolling handbell occurs and the tallying happens hold does not hold hold the annulment does not occur. sent7: that the coccalness and the screwball happens does not hold. sent8: the bolometricness does not occur. sent9: the non-salivaryness is prevented by the revising Bushman. sent10: the parade happens and the revising pendulum occurs. sent11: if the tectonicsness does not occur then the examining occurs and the arboriculture occurs. sent12: that the shot does not occur is prevented by that the lifting occurs and the brush does not occur. sent13: if the revising Bushman does not occur then the fact that the salivariness occurs and the LIFO does not occur is wrong. sent14: the tectonicsness does not occur. sent15: the LIFO does not occur if the arboriculture happens. sent16: the subtropicalness occurs if the catechism occurs but the striking does not occur. sent17: the carelessness does not occur. sent18: the revising Bushman is triggered by that the atrophy but not the LIFO happens. sent19: the fact that the back-channelness does not occur and the requital does not occur is not true if the atrophy does not occur. sent20: if the fact that that the coccalness happens and the screwball occurs is not right is not incorrect then that the back-channelness does not occur is not incorrect.
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the back-channelness does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the atrophying but not the barking occurs.; int2 -> int3: the atrophying happens.; sent11 & sent14 -> int4: the examining and the arboriculture occurs.; int4 -> int5: the arboriculture occurs.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: that the LIFO does not occur is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the atrophying but not the LIFO occurs.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the revising Bushman happens.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the salivariness happens hold.; sent5 & sent17 -> int10: the music occurs.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the salivariness and the music happens.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the requital happens.
$hypothesis$ = the requital occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the atrophy occurs but the bark does not occur if the back-channelness does not occur is not false. sent2: the music happens and/or the carelessness occurs if the arboriculture does not occur. sent3: the requital happens if that the back-channelness does not occur and the requital does not occur is not correct. sent4: that both the salivariness and the music occurs prevents that the requital happens. sent5: the music happens if that the carelessness does not occur hold. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the fact that the patrolling handbell occurs and the tallying happens hold does not hold hold the annulment does not occur. sent7: that the coccalness and the screwball happens does not hold. sent8: the bolometricness does not occur. sent9: the non-salivaryness is prevented by the revising Bushman. sent10: the parade happens and the revising pendulum occurs. sent11: if the tectonicsness does not occur then the examining occurs and the arboriculture occurs. sent12: that the shot does not occur is prevented by that the lifting occurs and the brush does not occur. sent13: if the revising Bushman does not occur then the fact that the salivariness occurs and the LIFO does not occur is wrong. sent14: the tectonicsness does not occur. sent15: the LIFO does not occur if the arboriculture happens. sent16: the subtropicalness occurs if the catechism occurs but the striking does not occur. sent17: the carelessness does not occur. sent18: the revising Bushman is triggered by that the atrophy but not the LIFO happens. sent19: the fact that the back-channelness does not occur and the requital does not occur is not true if the atrophy does not occur. sent20: if the fact that that the coccalness happens and the screwball occurs is not right is not incorrect then that the back-channelness does not occur is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the back-channelness does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the atrophying but not the barking occurs.; int2 -> int3: the atrophying happens.; sent11 & sent14 -> int4: the examining and the arboriculture occurs.; int4 -> int5: the arboriculture occurs.; sent15 & int5 -> int6: that the LIFO does not occur is correct.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the atrophying but not the LIFO occurs.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the revising Bushman happens.; int8 & sent9 -> int9: the fact that the salivariness happens hold.; sent5 & sent17 -> int10: the music occurs.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the salivariness and the music happens.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__