the PR is indelicate and/or it does French dinette.
sent1: if the plebeian is not a kind of an anode the bangle is a frontal and is muciferous. sent2: if the Menorah is not pluralistic the winery is a kind of non-multicultural thing that is not an iodide. sent3: if the fact that something does not bottom and/or it does snick scrumpy is not true then it is muciferous. sent4: the plebeian is muciferous if that it bottoms and/or does snick scrumpy is wrong. sent5: either something does unravel or it does not rejoice or both if it is not an iodide. sent6: something is indelicate and/or Frenches dinette if it does not swing. sent7: if the fact that something does swing and does participate is not correct it does not swing. sent8: the plebeian is bottom and/or does snick scrumpy. sent9: if something is not a frontal then that it snicks scrumpy and/or is an anode is true. sent10: if the winery does not swing the bangle is not a frontal and it is not a kind of an anode. sent11: the plebeian does bottom. sent12: the bangle is an anode. sent13: something is not a Parus if it does unravel and/or it does not rejoice. sent14: if the plebeian is not a bottom and/or does snick scrumpy the bangle is not an anode. sent15: if there exists something such that it is muciferous and/or is a kind of a frontal the PR does not swing. sent16: if that the dinette is not a Gerbillus hold then the fact that the Menorah is not pluralistic is not false. sent17: if something is not a Parus the fact that it is a kind of a swing that does participate is not correct. sent18: if that the bangle is not a kind of a frontal is not wrong it is an anode and/or it is a swing. sent19: if the plebeian is not muciferous then the fact that either the PR is indelicate or it Frenches dinette or both is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plebeian is not a kind of a bottom and/or it snicks scrumpy.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the bangle is not an anode.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that either the plebeian does not bottom or it snicks scrumpy or both is not right.; sent3 -> int4: the plebeian is muciferous if the fact that it is not a bottom and/or it does snick scrumpy is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the plebeian is muciferous.; int5 -> int6: the plebeian is muciferous and/or it is a frontal.; int6 -> int7: something is muciferous and/or not non-frontal.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the PR is not a kind of a swing.; sent6 -> int9: the PR is indelicate and/or Frenches dinette if it is not a swing.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the PR is indelicate or it does French dinette or both is wrong.
sent7 -> int10: the fact that the winery is not a kind of the swing if that the fact that the winery is a kind of a swing that does participate is not right is not wrong is true.; sent17 -> int11: that the winery is a kind of a swing that participates is incorrect if it is not a Parus.; sent13 -> int12: if the winery unravels or it does not rejoice or both it is not a kind of a Parus.; sent5 -> int13: the winery unravels or it does not rejoice or both if it is not a kind of an iodide.;
$hypothesis$ = the PR is indelicate and/or it does French dinette. ; $context$ = sent1: if the plebeian is not a kind of an anode the bangle is a frontal and is muciferous. sent2: if the Menorah is not pluralistic the winery is a kind of non-multicultural thing that is not an iodide. sent3: if the fact that something does not bottom and/or it does snick scrumpy is not true then it is muciferous. sent4: the plebeian is muciferous if that it bottoms and/or does snick scrumpy is wrong. sent5: either something does unravel or it does not rejoice or both if it is not an iodide. sent6: something is indelicate and/or Frenches dinette if it does not swing. sent7: if the fact that something does swing and does participate is not correct it does not swing. sent8: the plebeian is bottom and/or does snick scrumpy. sent9: if something is not a frontal then that it snicks scrumpy and/or is an anode is true. sent10: if the winery does not swing the bangle is not a frontal and it is not a kind of an anode. sent11: the plebeian does bottom. sent12: the bangle is an anode. sent13: something is not a Parus if it does unravel and/or it does not rejoice. sent14: if the plebeian is not a bottom and/or does snick scrumpy the bangle is not an anode. sent15: if there exists something such that it is muciferous and/or is a kind of a frontal the PR does not swing. sent16: if that the dinette is not a Gerbillus hold then the fact that the Menorah is not pluralistic is not false. sent17: if something is not a Parus the fact that it is a kind of a swing that does participate is not correct. sent18: if that the bangle is not a kind of a frontal is not wrong it is an anode and/or it is a swing. sent19: if the plebeian is not muciferous then the fact that either the PR is indelicate or it Frenches dinette or both is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the plebeian is not a kind of a bottom and/or it snicks scrumpy.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the bangle is not an anode.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that either the plebeian does not bottom or it snicks scrumpy or both is not right.; sent3 -> int4: the plebeian is muciferous if the fact that it is not a bottom and/or it does snick scrumpy is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the plebeian is muciferous.; int5 -> int6: the plebeian is muciferous and/or it is a frontal.; int6 -> int7: something is muciferous and/or not non-frontal.; int7 & sent15 -> int8: the PR is not a kind of a swing.; sent6 -> int9: the PR is indelicate and/or Frenches dinette if it is not a swing.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__