the fact that the Farsi is a futurist and is leptorrhine does not hold.
sent1: something is both a futurist and autolytic if it is not Mercurial. sent2: the passkey is not non-amoebic if there is something such that it is nasopharyngeal and it is Wittgensteinian. sent3: that the Farsi is both a futurist and leptorrhine is wrong if there exists something such that it is amoebic. sent4: the scuff is autolytic. sent5: if a confidence is nasopharyngeal then it does not interfere occultism. sent6: the passkey is leptorrhine and is not a Courtelle. sent7: if the scuff does not interfere occultism the clearing interfere occultism and/or it is a confidence. sent8: the scuff is palatial if that the clearing is both non-autolytic and not non-Mercurial does not hold. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of non-autolytic thing that is Mercurial is not right if it does not interfere occultism. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Courtelle is not incorrect. sent11: if the Farsi is a confidence and does not interfere occultism it is not Mercurial. sent12: that the cashew is nasopharyngeal is true if the fact that the clearing is a kind of a confidence is not incorrect. sent13: if the Farsi is not nasopharyngeal then it is a kind of a confidence and it does not interfere occultism. sent14: the scuff is Mercurial. sent15: the clearing is a futurist and it is nasopharyngeal if it is not leptorrhine. sent16: if there is something such that it is a Courtelle then the cashew is Wittgensteinian and is postmeridian. sent17: the clearing is not leptorrhine if the passkey is not leptorrhine but it is not a Courtelle. sent18: if that the Farsi is not a mugging and it is not postmeridian is correct the cashew is not amoebic. sent19: if the scuff is palatial the stable is palatial. sent20: the Farsi does not mug and it is not postmeridian. sent21: something is leptorrhine. sent22: if something is autolytic and it is Mercurial the fact that it does not interfere occultism hold.
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the scuff is both not non-autolytic and not non-Mercurial.; sent22 -> int2: if the scuff is autolytic thing that is Mercurial the fact that it does not interfere occultism is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the scuff does not interfere occultism.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that either the clearing does interfere occultism or it is a confidence or both is right.; sent10 & sent16 -> int5: the cashew is a kind of Wittgensteinian thing that is not non-postmeridian.; int5 -> int6: the cashew is Wittgensteinian.;
the Farsi is a futurist and it is leptorrhine.
sent1 -> int7: if the Farsi is not Mercurial it is a kind of a futurist and it is autolytic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Farsi is a futurist and is leptorrhine does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something is both a futurist and autolytic if it is not Mercurial. sent2: the passkey is not non-amoebic if there is something such that it is nasopharyngeal and it is Wittgensteinian. sent3: that the Farsi is both a futurist and leptorrhine is wrong if there exists something such that it is amoebic. sent4: the scuff is autolytic. sent5: if a confidence is nasopharyngeal then it does not interfere occultism. sent6: the passkey is leptorrhine and is not a Courtelle. sent7: if the scuff does not interfere occultism the clearing interfere occultism and/or it is a confidence. sent8: the scuff is palatial if that the clearing is both non-autolytic and not non-Mercurial does not hold. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of non-autolytic thing that is Mercurial is not right if it does not interfere occultism. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Courtelle is not incorrect. sent11: if the Farsi is a confidence and does not interfere occultism it is not Mercurial. sent12: that the cashew is nasopharyngeal is true if the fact that the clearing is a kind of a confidence is not incorrect. sent13: if the Farsi is not nasopharyngeal then it is a kind of a confidence and it does not interfere occultism. sent14: the scuff is Mercurial. sent15: the clearing is a futurist and it is nasopharyngeal if it is not leptorrhine. sent16: if there is something such that it is a Courtelle then the cashew is Wittgensteinian and is postmeridian. sent17: the clearing is not leptorrhine if the passkey is not leptorrhine but it is not a Courtelle. sent18: if that the Farsi is not a mugging and it is not postmeridian is correct the cashew is not amoebic. sent19: if the scuff is palatial the stable is palatial. sent20: the Farsi does not mug and it is not postmeridian. sent21: something is leptorrhine. sent22: if something is autolytic and it is Mercurial the fact that it does not interfere occultism hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent14 -> int1: the scuff is both not non-autolytic and not non-Mercurial.; sent22 -> int2: if the scuff is autolytic thing that is Mercurial the fact that it does not interfere occultism is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the scuff does not interfere occultism.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that either the clearing does interfere occultism or it is a confidence or both is right.; sent10 & sent16 -> int5: the cashew is a kind of Wittgensteinian thing that is not non-postmeridian.; int5 -> int6: the cashew is Wittgensteinian.; __UNKNOWN__