the speedskater is a British but it is not a kind of a contested.
sent1: the aperitif is not a kind of a buffoonery if that the bow-wow is British and it is argumentative is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it does not blossom and is adroit. sent3: a non-Balzacian thing is both a buffoonery and argumentative. sent4: if the SC is not a kind of a British then the speedskater is a British that is not a contested. sent5: if that something is not accusative and it is not Mozambican does not hold the fact that it is not Balzacian is right. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not blossom and it is adroit is not correct then that the bow-wow is not argumentative hold. sent7: the hemoprotein does not blossom if the whalebone is not a buffoonery. sent8: the fact that the bow-wow is not a disagreement if the hemoprotein is not undesirous is not wrong. sent9: the speedskater is not a contested. sent10: the hemoprotein is not a buffoonery if that the bow-wow is not argumentative is true. sent11: there is something such that it is not a buffoonery and it does contest. sent12: the fact that the whalebone blossoms and it is adroit is not true. sent13: if something does blossom then the bow-wow is not argumentative. sent14: if the hemoprotein is not a kind of a buffoonery then the SC is not a British. sent15: if the bow-wow is not a disagreement then the fact that it is both not an accusative and not Mozambican is not true. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it does blossom and it is adroit is incorrect. sent17: if the SC is not British the speedskater is not a contested.
that that the speedskater is British but it is not a contested is not incorrect is wrong.
sent3 -> int1: if the bow-wow is not Balzacian then it is a buffoonery and it is not unargumentative.; sent5 -> int2: the bow-wow is not Balzacian if that it is not an accusative and it is not a kind of a Mozambican does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the speedskater is a British but it is not a kind of a contested. ; $context$ = sent1: the aperitif is not a kind of a buffoonery if that the bow-wow is British and it is argumentative is wrong. sent2: there exists something such that it does not blossom and is adroit. sent3: a non-Balzacian thing is both a buffoonery and argumentative. sent4: if the SC is not a kind of a British then the speedskater is a British that is not a contested. sent5: if that something is not accusative and it is not Mozambican does not hold the fact that it is not Balzacian is right. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not blossom and it is adroit is not correct then that the bow-wow is not argumentative hold. sent7: the hemoprotein does not blossom if the whalebone is not a buffoonery. sent8: the fact that the bow-wow is not a disagreement if the hemoprotein is not undesirous is not wrong. sent9: the speedskater is not a contested. sent10: the hemoprotein is not a buffoonery if that the bow-wow is not argumentative is true. sent11: there is something such that it is not a buffoonery and it does contest. sent12: the fact that the whalebone blossoms and it is adroit is not true. sent13: if something does blossom then the bow-wow is not argumentative. sent14: if the hemoprotein is not a kind of a buffoonery then the SC is not a British. sent15: if the bow-wow is not a disagreement then the fact that it is both not an accusative and not Mozambican is not true. sent16: there is something such that the fact that it does blossom and it is adroit is incorrect. sent17: if the SC is not British the speedskater is not a contested. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__