the fact that the dogfish is not lawful but it is a masonry is incorrect.
sent1: that the wafer is not a kind of an offering but it does bog parthenote is not true. sent2: either the phaius is dicarboxylic or it is not dormant or both if there exists something such that it purges. sent3: if something does demonstrate that it does politicize hold. sent4: if something is dicarboxylic or is not dormant or both the blower is not botanic. sent5: if something is non-botanic then that it does not demonstrate and does not school is wrong. sent6: if the dogfish does politicize the fact that the kasbah is not a shabbiness but it is Socratic is wrong. sent7: the blower politicizes. sent8: that the dogfish is lawful and it is a masonry is not true. sent9: the blower does not demonstrate if the dogfish is a kind of unlawful thing that is a kind of a masonry. sent10: something is not lawful and is a masonry if it politicizes. sent11: the apoenzyme is a kind of a purge but it is not autogamous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dogfish is not lawful but it is a masonry.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the blower does not demonstrate.;
the fact that the kasbah is not a shabbiness and is Socratic is not correct.
sent3 -> int2: the dogfish politicizes if it demonstrates.; sent5 -> int3: if that the blower is not botanic is not false the fact that it does not demonstrate and does not school is not true.; sent11 -> int4: the apoenzyme is a purge.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that it does purge.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the phaius is dicarboxylic and/or it is not dormant.; int6 -> int7: either something is dicarboxylic or it is not dormant or both.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the blower is not botanic.; int3 & int8 -> int9: that the blower does not demonstrate and it is not a school is not true.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it does not demonstrate and is not a kind of a school does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dogfish is not lawful but it is a masonry is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the wafer is not a kind of an offering but it does bog parthenote is not true. sent2: either the phaius is dicarboxylic or it is not dormant or both if there exists something such that it purges. sent3: if something does demonstrate that it does politicize hold. sent4: if something is dicarboxylic or is not dormant or both the blower is not botanic. sent5: if something is non-botanic then that it does not demonstrate and does not school is wrong. sent6: if the dogfish does politicize the fact that the kasbah is not a shabbiness but it is Socratic is wrong. sent7: the blower politicizes. sent8: that the dogfish is lawful and it is a masonry is not true. sent9: the blower does not demonstrate if the dogfish is a kind of unlawful thing that is a kind of a masonry. sent10: something is not lawful and is a masonry if it politicizes. sent11: the apoenzyme is a kind of a purge but it is not autogamous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dogfish is not lawful but it is a masonry.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the blower does not demonstrate.; __UNKNOWN__