the fact that the sociologist is protective and it confederates decameter hold.
sent1: if there exists something such that that it respires and does not declaw Zen is incorrect the courser is not a kind of a submersible. sent2: if something does not confederate canoe then the fact that it respires and does not declaw Zen does not hold. sent3: that the fact that the seidel does not confederate decameter and does declaw Keynesianism is right does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is both not moderating and not a Portuguese hold is not correct. sent5: if the triazine does not declaw Zen then it is submersible and it does respire. sent6: if something either is protective or is a pyrochemistry or both it is not a surprise. sent7: if the courser does not confederate canoe then that the seidel is not a kind of a resemblance and declaws Keynesianism is wrong. sent8: that the fact that the triazine is not a Thraupidae and not piscine is not false is false if the courser is not a kind of a submersible. sent9: the sociologist is not a kind of a pyrochemistry if there exists something such that the fact that it is both non-moderating and non-Portuguese is false. sent10: if that something does declaw Zen and does respire is wrong then it does not confederate canoe. sent11: the fact that the triazine is not a submersible is right. sent12: if the courser does not confederate canoe and does not declaw Zen the triazine does not declaw Zen. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a resemblance and does not confederate decameter. sent14: the sociologist is protective if there is something such that that it is not a resemblance and it declaws Keynesianism does not hold. sent15: the triazine is a kind of an antibacterial and/or it surprises if it is not a submersible. sent16: the sociologist does confederate decameter and it is a comforter if it is not a pyrochemistry. sent17: if the triazine does not respire then the fact that the courser does declaw Zen and it does respire is not correct.
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: either the triazine is antibacterial or it is a surprise or both.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the courser declaws Zen and it does respire is false then it does not confederate canoe.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: that the sociologist is not a pyrochemistry hold.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the sociologist does confederate decameter and it is a kind of a comforter.; int4 -> int5: the sociologist confederates decameter.;
that the sociologist is protective and does confederate decameter is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the sociologist is protective and it confederates decameter hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that that it respires and does not declaw Zen is incorrect the courser is not a kind of a submersible. sent2: if something does not confederate canoe then the fact that it respires and does not declaw Zen does not hold. sent3: that the fact that the seidel does not confederate decameter and does declaw Keynesianism is right does not hold. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it is both not moderating and not a Portuguese hold is not correct. sent5: if the triazine does not declaw Zen then it is submersible and it does respire. sent6: if something either is protective or is a pyrochemistry or both it is not a surprise. sent7: if the courser does not confederate canoe then that the seidel is not a kind of a resemblance and declaws Keynesianism is wrong. sent8: that the fact that the triazine is not a Thraupidae and not piscine is not false is false if the courser is not a kind of a submersible. sent9: the sociologist is not a kind of a pyrochemistry if there exists something such that the fact that it is both non-moderating and non-Portuguese is false. sent10: if that something does declaw Zen and does respire is wrong then it does not confederate canoe. sent11: the fact that the triazine is not a submersible is right. sent12: if the courser does not confederate canoe and does not declaw Zen the triazine does not declaw Zen. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a resemblance and does not confederate decameter. sent14: the sociologist is protective if there is something such that that it is not a resemblance and it declaws Keynesianism does not hold. sent15: the triazine is a kind of an antibacterial and/or it surprises if it is not a submersible. sent16: the sociologist does confederate decameter and it is a comforter if it is not a pyrochemistry. sent17: if the triazine does not respire then the fact that the courser does declaw Zen and it does respire is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent11 -> int1: either the triazine is antibacterial or it is a surprise or both.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the courser declaws Zen and it does respire is false then it does not confederate canoe.; sent4 & sent9 -> int3: that the sociologist is not a pyrochemistry hold.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the sociologist does confederate decameter and it is a kind of a comforter.; int4 -> int5: the sociologist confederates decameter.; __UNKNOWN__