the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a Fugo and it is a kind of a TKO is wrong it does ray stir does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that something does not vacate Arenaviridae but it is a kind of a foul is false then it is voluble. sent2: if the crottle is not a TKO then it is not non-asterismal. sent3: if the fact that the triskelion is both a Fugo and a TKO is wrong then it rays stir. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not vacate concrete and it is microscopic is not correct it is an umbel. sent5: if the snarer is not productive it does ray stir. sent6: if something is both not a Fugo and a TKO it does ray stir. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Fugo that is a TKO is incorrect then it does ray stir. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not laicize mercer it is a balance. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Fugo and is a TKO it does ray stir. sent10: something rays stir if the fact that it is both a Fugo and a TKO does not hold. sent11: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Fugo but it is a TKO is wrong then it rays stir. sent12: if something is not idiomatic but it is a passing then the fact that it is trapezoidal is not incorrect. sent13: if the fact that that something is not contralateral but it does vacate Adiantum is true is not right it is a cerium.
sent11 -> int1: the triskelion rays stir if that it is not a Fugo and it is a TKO is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it is not a Fugo and it is a kind of a TKO is wrong it does ray stir does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not vacate Arenaviridae but it is a kind of a foul is false then it is voluble. sent2: if the crottle is not a TKO then it is not non-asterismal. sent3: if the fact that the triskelion is both a Fugo and a TKO is wrong then it rays stir. sent4: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not vacate concrete and it is microscopic is not correct it is an umbel. sent5: if the snarer is not productive it does ray stir. sent6: if something is both not a Fugo and a TKO it does ray stir. sent7: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Fugo that is a TKO is incorrect then it does ray stir. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not laicize mercer it is a balance. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a Fugo and is a TKO it does ray stir. sent10: something rays stir if the fact that it is both a Fugo and a TKO does not hold. sent11: if the fact that something is not a kind of a Fugo but it is a TKO is wrong then it rays stir. sent12: if something is not idiomatic but it is a passing then the fact that it is trapezoidal is not incorrect. sent13: if the fact that that something is not contralateral but it does vacate Adiantum is true is not right it is a cerium. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the triskelion rays stir if that it is not a Fugo and it is a TKO is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__