the fleapit is not a Nazarene and/or it strengthens cosmopolitan.
sent1: the emission does not strengthen optimum if that the paramour does toy and does strengthen optimum is not correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a toy and is a Nazarene is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a areca. sent4: the cosmopolitan does not toy. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is forehand and it does not strengthen optimum is wrong then the paramour is not a kind of a flagellum. sent6: the fleapit is a kind of a flagellum. sent7: the fleapit does not strengthen optimum if there are Nazarene things. sent8: the fleapit is not a kind of a Nazarene and/or does strengthen cosmopolitan if it is not a kind of a forehand. sent9: the fact that the jackdaw is adoptive and it is forehand is not true. sent10: the emission is a flagellum if something that strengthens Kodiak is not a areca. sent11: if the emission is a flagellum it does strengthen optimum. sent12: the fleapit does not toy. sent13: if there is something such that that it does strengthen Kodiak and is not a areca is false the fact that the fleapit is not a forehand is correct. sent14: the fact that the fact that the fleapit strengthens cosmopolitan and it toys is false is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cosmopolitan strengthens Kodiak but it is not a areca.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it strengthens Kodiak and it is not a areca.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the emission is a kind of a flagellum.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the emission does strengthen optimum.;
$hypothesis$ = the fleapit is not a Nazarene and/or it strengthens cosmopolitan. ; $context$ = sent1: the emission does not strengthen optimum if that the paramour does toy and does strengthen optimum is not correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a toy and is a Nazarene is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a areca. sent4: the cosmopolitan does not toy. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that it is forehand and it does not strengthen optimum is wrong then the paramour is not a kind of a flagellum. sent6: the fleapit is a kind of a flagellum. sent7: the fleapit does not strengthen optimum if there are Nazarene things. sent8: the fleapit is not a kind of a Nazarene and/or does strengthen cosmopolitan if it is not a kind of a forehand. sent9: the fact that the jackdaw is adoptive and it is forehand is not true. sent10: the emission is a flagellum if something that strengthens Kodiak is not a areca. sent11: if the emission is a flagellum it does strengthen optimum. sent12: the fleapit does not toy. sent13: if there is something such that that it does strengthen Kodiak and is not a areca is false the fact that the fleapit is not a forehand is correct. sent14: the fact that the fact that the fleapit strengthens cosmopolitan and it toys is false is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cosmopolitan strengthens Kodiak but it is not a areca.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it strengthens Kodiak and it is not a areca.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the emission is a kind of a flagellum.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the emission does strengthen optimum.; __UNKNOWN__