the Tonganness does not occur if the reopening D does not occur.
sent1: the trouble happens. sent2: both the cohesion and the affixalness occurs if that the eccrineness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the execration does not occur. sent4: that the concerning reduction does not occur and the inconsistentness occurs is not right. sent5: that the Tongan occurs is prevented by that the valediction does not occur and the reopening D does not occur. sent6: the non-affixalness triggers that both the rallying and the allogeneicness happens. sent7: the sensoriness does not occur. sent8: the discoloration and the nonfinancialness occurs. sent9: that the expensing removal and the immunodeficientness occurs is false. sent10: the bacteriophagicness happens if the allogeneicness occurs. sent11: that the valediction does not occur is caused by that both the bacteriophagicness and the affixalness occurs. sent12: that the spanking happens and the neologism does not occur is triggered by the non-allogeneicness. sent13: that the tossing does not occur hold. sent14: the fact that if the fact that not the concerning reduction but the inconsistentness happens is false then the eccrineness does not occur hold. sent15: that the spanking occurs and the neologism does not occur is false if the tragicomicness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allogeneicness does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the spanking happens and the neologism does not occur.; sent14 & sent4 -> int2: the eccrineness does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: both the cohesion and the affixalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the affixalness happens.;
the rallying occurs and the brisking does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Tonganness does not occur if the reopening D does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the trouble happens. sent2: both the cohesion and the affixalness occurs if that the eccrineness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: the execration does not occur. sent4: that the concerning reduction does not occur and the inconsistentness occurs is not right. sent5: that the Tongan occurs is prevented by that the valediction does not occur and the reopening D does not occur. sent6: the non-affixalness triggers that both the rallying and the allogeneicness happens. sent7: the sensoriness does not occur. sent8: the discoloration and the nonfinancialness occurs. sent9: that the expensing removal and the immunodeficientness occurs is false. sent10: the bacteriophagicness happens if the allogeneicness occurs. sent11: that the valediction does not occur is caused by that both the bacteriophagicness and the affixalness occurs. sent12: that the spanking happens and the neologism does not occur is triggered by the non-allogeneicness. sent13: that the tossing does not occur hold. sent14: the fact that if the fact that not the concerning reduction but the inconsistentness happens is false then the eccrineness does not occur hold. sent15: that the spanking occurs and the neologism does not occur is false if the tragicomicness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the allogeneicness does not occur.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the spanking happens and the neologism does not occur.; sent14 & sent4 -> int2: the eccrineness does not occur.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: both the cohesion and the affixalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the affixalness happens.; __UNKNOWN__