the hula happens and the stare does not occur.
sent1: the stinting trotter does not occur. sent2: the obviousness does not occur if the unlawfulness does not occur. sent3: that not the bidding but the stinting implant occurs is triggered by that the grumbling Ull does not occur. sent4: if that the refusal does not occur hold the hula happens. sent5: the spark does not occur if the substantivalness does not occur. sent6: the hula happens. sent7: that the hula happens and the stare does not occur is not right if the stinting trotter occurs. sent8: the non-substantivalness triggers that not the spark but the grumbling seaworthiness occurs. sent9: the substantivalness does not occur if the stinting trotter does not occur. sent10: that the refusal does not occur is triggered by that not the spark but the grumbling seaworthiness occurs. sent11: that both the refusal and the grumbling Wausau occurs is triggered by that the stinting implant does not occur. sent12: that the spark occurs and the grumbling seaworthiness happens brings about that the refusal does not occur. sent13: the spark does not occur. sent14: the grumbling seaworthiness does not occur if the fact that that not the spark but the grumbling seaworthiness happens is false is correct. sent15: the hula occurs and the stare does not occur if the refusal does not occur.
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the substantivalness does not occur.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the spark does not occur but the grumbling seaworthiness occurs.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the refusal does not occur.; sent15 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the hula occurs but the stare does not occur is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the hula happens and the stare does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the stinting trotter does not occur. sent2: the obviousness does not occur if the unlawfulness does not occur. sent3: that not the bidding but the stinting implant occurs is triggered by that the grumbling Ull does not occur. sent4: if that the refusal does not occur hold the hula happens. sent5: the spark does not occur if the substantivalness does not occur. sent6: the hula happens. sent7: that the hula happens and the stare does not occur is not right if the stinting trotter occurs. sent8: the non-substantivalness triggers that not the spark but the grumbling seaworthiness occurs. sent9: the substantivalness does not occur if the stinting trotter does not occur. sent10: that the refusal does not occur is triggered by that not the spark but the grumbling seaworthiness occurs. sent11: that both the refusal and the grumbling Wausau occurs is triggered by that the stinting implant does not occur. sent12: that the spark occurs and the grumbling seaworthiness happens brings about that the refusal does not occur. sent13: the spark does not occur. sent14: the grumbling seaworthiness does not occur if the fact that that not the spark but the grumbling seaworthiness happens is false is correct. sent15: the hula occurs and the stare does not occur if the refusal does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the substantivalness does not occur.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the spark does not occur but the grumbling seaworthiness occurs.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the refusal does not occur.; sent15 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__