the clapboard deserts.
sent1: the planetarium is not a kind of a proctologist and it does not scallop tare. sent2: if the planetarium is not a proctologist but it scallops tare the clapboard does not desert. sent3: the fact that the isothiocyanate is not a cliff and it does not horripilate is not right. sent4: if the planetarium is not a kind of a proctologist and does not scallop tare then the clapboard is not a desert. sent5: if something horripilates then that it is a trawler but not deflationary is false. sent6: if something is deflationary it deserts. sent7: that the planetarium does not scallop tare is right. sent8: if the planetarium does not scallop tare and it is not a desert then the fact that the clapboard is not a kind of a proctologist is right.
sent4 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the clapboard does desert.
sent6 -> int1: the clapboard is a kind of a desert if it is deflationary.; sent5 -> int2: the fact that the planetarium is a trawler and is not deflationary does not hold if it does horripilate.; sent3 -> int3: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a cliff and it does not horripilate is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the clapboard deserts. ; $context$ = sent1: the planetarium is not a kind of a proctologist and it does not scallop tare. sent2: if the planetarium is not a proctologist but it scallops tare the clapboard does not desert. sent3: the fact that the isothiocyanate is not a cliff and it does not horripilate is not right. sent4: if the planetarium is not a kind of a proctologist and does not scallop tare then the clapboard is not a desert. sent5: if something horripilates then that it is a trawler but not deflationary is false. sent6: if something is deflationary it deserts. sent7: that the planetarium does not scallop tare is right. sent8: if the planetarium does not scallop tare and it is not a desert then the fact that the clapboard is not a kind of a proctologist is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__