the theodolite is not a conceptualism and does gorge toed.
sent1: the theodolite does gorge toed if the abbacy is not a conceptualism. sent2: if that that the positivist does not gorge Kamet but it is gentile is not true hold the antiferromagnetism is a rusted. sent3: if the theodolite gorges Erythrocebus and does not gorge toed then it is not a rofecoxib. sent4: that the antiferromagnetism is not a rofecoxib is true. sent5: The fact that the Erythrocebus gorges antiferromagnetism is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the antiferromagnetism gorges Erythrocebus is not incorrect. sent7: the antiferromagnetism rusts if the positivist is not a gentile. sent8: the antiferromagnetism is not a kind of a west if it gorges Erythrocebus and is not a kind of a rofecoxib. sent9: if the positivist is gentile thing that does not rust then it is not a kind of a west. sent10: something that does not refrain documented is west and a rusted. sent11: the bolo does gorge toed. sent12: if something refrains documented it is not a kind of a conceptualism. sent13: that the theodolite is not a conceptualism and does gorge toed is correct if the abbacy is not a conceptualism. sent14: that something is not a conceptualism but it gorges toed is false if it is west. sent15: the antiferromagnetism is a west if it is a rusted.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the positivist does not gorge Kamet and is a gentile does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the antiferromagnetism is a rusted.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the antiferromagnetism is a kind of a west.; sent6 & sent4 -> int3: the antiferromagnetism gorges Erythrocebus and is not a rofecoxib.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the antiferromagnetism is non-west.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the positivist does not gorge Kamet and is a gentile.; sent12 -> int7: the abbacy is not a conceptualism if it refrains documented.;
the fact that that the theodolite is not a kind of a conceptualism and does gorge toed is not incorrect is not right.
sent14 -> int8: if the theodolite is a kind of a west that it is not a conceptualism and does gorge toed does not hold.; sent10 -> int9: the theodolite is both west and a rusted if it does not refrain documented.;
$hypothesis$ = the theodolite is not a conceptualism and does gorge toed. ; $context$ = sent1: the theodolite does gorge toed if the abbacy is not a conceptualism. sent2: if that that the positivist does not gorge Kamet but it is gentile is not true hold the antiferromagnetism is a rusted. sent3: if the theodolite gorges Erythrocebus and does not gorge toed then it is not a rofecoxib. sent4: that the antiferromagnetism is not a rofecoxib is true. sent5: The fact that the Erythrocebus gorges antiferromagnetism is not incorrect. sent6: the fact that the antiferromagnetism gorges Erythrocebus is not incorrect. sent7: the antiferromagnetism rusts if the positivist is not a gentile. sent8: the antiferromagnetism is not a kind of a west if it gorges Erythrocebus and is not a kind of a rofecoxib. sent9: if the positivist is gentile thing that does not rust then it is not a kind of a west. sent10: something that does not refrain documented is west and a rusted. sent11: the bolo does gorge toed. sent12: if something refrains documented it is not a kind of a conceptualism. sent13: that the theodolite is not a conceptualism and does gorge toed is correct if the abbacy is not a conceptualism. sent14: that something is not a conceptualism but it gorges toed is false if it is west. sent15: the antiferromagnetism is a west if it is a rusted. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the positivist does not gorge Kamet and is a gentile does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the antiferromagnetism is a rusted.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the antiferromagnetism is a kind of a west.; sent6 & sent4 -> int3: the antiferromagnetism gorges Erythrocebus and is not a rofecoxib.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the antiferromagnetism is non-west.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the positivist does not gorge Kamet and is a gentile.; sent12 -> int7: the abbacy is not a conceptualism if it refrains documented.; __UNKNOWN__