if the Phoebe hiccups the fact that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but it is insoluble is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that it is not apian. sent2: if the hurdle is not a barricade the pipsissewa does not barricade but it is insoluble. sent3: if the Teflon is not a celebration then that it does not multiply hatchery and it hiccups is not correct. sent4: that the pipsissewa does barricade and it is insoluble does not hold if the hurdle is not a barricade. sent5: the Phoebe does multiply hatchery if it is a kind of a chambered. sent6: the pipsissewa is not a barricade but it is insoluble if the Phoebe does hiccup. sent7: the guppy leaches outlandishness if that the pipsissewa does leaches outlandishness but it does not barricade is not right. sent8: the Teflon is not a celebration if there is something such that it is not apian. sent9: if the fact that the Chicano is not a sparseness hold the fact that it is not incommutable and it is sociolinguistic is not true. sent10: if the fact that something is not incommutable and is sociolinguistic is false then it is not shambolic. sent11: if the Phoebe hiccups and it does multiply hatchery then the hurdle is not a kind of a barricade. sent12: the fact that the pipsissewa is a barricade and insoluble is false. sent13: the pipsissewa is a hiccup. sent14: the Chicano is not a sparseness. sent15: that the hurdle is insoluble is right. sent16: that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but insoluble is not right if the hurdle does not barricade. sent17: the fact that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but insoluble is correct. sent18: that the pipsissewa leaches outlandishness and is not a barricade is not right if the Chicano is not shambolic. sent19: the Phoebe does chamber. sent20: the fact that the pipsissewa does barricade and it is insoluble does not hold if the Phoebe does hiccup.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Phoebe is a hiccup is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent19 -> int1: the Phoebe multiplies hatchery.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the Phoebe does hiccup and does multiply hatchery.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the hurdle is not a barricade.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but it is insoluble does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the guppy does leach outlandishness and is not soluble.
sent10 -> int5: if that the Chicano is not incommutable but it is sociolinguistic is not correct then it is not shambolic.; sent9 & sent14 -> int6: that the Chicano is not incommutable but it is sociolinguistic is wrong.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Chicano is not shambolic.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: that the pipsissewa does leach outlandishness and is not a kind of a barricade is not true.; sent7 & int8 -> int9: the guppy leaches outlandishness.; sent1 & sent8 -> int10: the Teflon is not a celebration.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: that that the Teflon does not multiply hatchery and hiccups is not correct is right.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it does not multiply hatchery and it is a kind of a hiccup does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = if the Phoebe hiccups the fact that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but it is insoluble is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that it is not apian. sent2: if the hurdle is not a barricade the pipsissewa does not barricade but it is insoluble. sent3: if the Teflon is not a celebration then that it does not multiply hatchery and it hiccups is not correct. sent4: that the pipsissewa does barricade and it is insoluble does not hold if the hurdle is not a barricade. sent5: the Phoebe does multiply hatchery if it is a kind of a chambered. sent6: the pipsissewa is not a barricade but it is insoluble if the Phoebe does hiccup. sent7: the guppy leaches outlandishness if that the pipsissewa does leaches outlandishness but it does not barricade is not right. sent8: the Teflon is not a celebration if there is something such that it is not apian. sent9: if the fact that the Chicano is not a sparseness hold the fact that it is not incommutable and it is sociolinguistic is not true. sent10: if the fact that something is not incommutable and is sociolinguistic is false then it is not shambolic. sent11: if the Phoebe hiccups and it does multiply hatchery then the hurdle is not a kind of a barricade. sent12: the fact that the pipsissewa is a barricade and insoluble is false. sent13: the pipsissewa is a hiccup. sent14: the Chicano is not a sparseness. sent15: that the hurdle is insoluble is right. sent16: that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but insoluble is not right if the hurdle does not barricade. sent17: the fact that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but insoluble is correct. sent18: that the pipsissewa leaches outlandishness and is not a barricade is not right if the Chicano is not shambolic. sent19: the Phoebe does chamber. sent20: the fact that the pipsissewa does barricade and it is insoluble does not hold if the Phoebe does hiccup. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Phoebe is a hiccup is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent19 -> int1: the Phoebe multiplies hatchery.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: the Phoebe does hiccup and does multiply hatchery.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the hurdle is not a barricade.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: that the pipsissewa is not a barricade but it is insoluble does not hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__