the lunching is a jack-o'-lantern but not a compass.
sent1: the fact that the bag is not a moonbeam is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is not pineal and it is a kind of a moonbeam is incorrect. sent2: something eulogizes separationism if it renders bag. sent3: if the fact that the Mugwump does eulogize separationism hold then that it is not a return and renders psychotic is not right. sent4: if that the LP is not viral hold then the lunching triplicates and/or it does not render psychotic. sent5: something is a kind of a jack-o'-lantern and does eulogize separationism if it does not render bag. sent6: if the lunching returns the fact that it is a kind of a triplicate and/or does not render psychotic is false. sent7: The bag does not render lunching. sent8: that the LP is not viral is not wrong. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not return and it does render psychotic does not hold then the fact that the LP is not a triplicate is right. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-pineal a moonbeam is incorrect. sent11: the lunching does not render bag. sent12: if something is not a moonbeam the Mugwump does render bag and it is viral. sent13: if that something is not a compass and is not a kind of a highbinder is wrong then that it returns is not false.
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the lunching does not compass and it is not a kind of a highbinder does not hold then that it returns hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the lunching is both not a compass and not a highbinder hold is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lunching is a return.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the lunching is a triplicate and/or it does not render psychotic is not true.; sent4 & sent8 -> int4: the lunching is a kind of a triplicate and/or does not render psychotic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the lunching is not a compass and not a highbinder.; int6 -> int7: the lunching is not a kind of a compass.; sent5 -> int8: if the lunching does not render bag then it is a kind of a jack-o'-lantern that eulogizes separationism.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the lunching is a kind of a jack-o'-lantern and does eulogize separationism.; int9 -> int10: that the lunching is a jack-o'-lantern hold.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the lunching is a kind of a jack-o'-lantern that is not a compass is incorrect.
sent2 -> int11: if the Mugwump does render bag then it does eulogize separationism.; sent10 & sent1 -> int12: the bag is not a moonbeam.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is not a moonbeam.; int13 & sent12 -> int14: the Mugwump does render bag and it is viral.; int14 -> int15: the Mugwump does render bag.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the Mugwump does eulogize separationism.; sent3 & int16 -> int17: that the Mugwump is not a kind of a return and renders psychotic is wrong.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that the fact that it is not a return and it does render psychotic is incorrect.; int18 & sent9 -> int19: the LP is not a triplicate.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a triplicate.;
$hypothesis$ = the lunching is a jack-o'-lantern but not a compass. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bag is not a moonbeam is correct if there is something such that the fact that it is not pineal and it is a kind of a moonbeam is incorrect. sent2: something eulogizes separationism if it renders bag. sent3: if the fact that the Mugwump does eulogize separationism hold then that it is not a return and renders psychotic is not right. sent4: if that the LP is not viral hold then the lunching triplicates and/or it does not render psychotic. sent5: something is a kind of a jack-o'-lantern and does eulogize separationism if it does not render bag. sent6: if the lunching returns the fact that it is a kind of a triplicate and/or does not render psychotic is false. sent7: The bag does not render lunching. sent8: that the LP is not viral is not wrong. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not return and it does render psychotic does not hold then the fact that the LP is not a triplicate is right. sent10: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-pineal a moonbeam is incorrect. sent11: the lunching does not render bag. sent12: if something is not a moonbeam the Mugwump does render bag and it is viral. sent13: if that something is not a compass and is not a kind of a highbinder is wrong then that it returns is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the lunching does not compass and it is not a kind of a highbinder does not hold then that it returns hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the lunching is both not a compass and not a highbinder hold is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lunching is a return.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the lunching is a triplicate and/or it does not render psychotic is not true.; sent4 & sent8 -> int4: the lunching is a kind of a triplicate and/or does not render psychotic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the lunching is not a compass and not a highbinder.; int6 -> int7: the lunching is not a kind of a compass.; sent5 -> int8: if the lunching does not render bag then it is a kind of a jack-o'-lantern that eulogizes separationism.; int8 & sent11 -> int9: the lunching is a kind of a jack-o'-lantern and does eulogize separationism.; int9 -> int10: that the lunching is a jack-o'-lantern hold.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__