the photometrist is not a caudate.
sent1: the adduct is not a kind of a flamboyance. sent2: the sovereign does not page Passiflora if it is not a kind of an almond. sent3: the adduct is a blare if the sovereign is not a blare and does not page Passiflora. sent4: that the photometrist is not a episiotomy but it pledges does not hold. sent5: if something is a episiotomy it does pledge and it is not a intravasation. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a episiotomy and is not a pledged does not hold. sent7: the fact that everything is not a intravasation and/or it is not a episiotomy is right. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a episiotomy and is not a pledged does not hold then the adduct is not a blare. sent9: the fact that the photometrist is a episiotomy but it is not a kind of a pledged does not hold. sent10: if the sovereign is not an almond then it is not a blare and it does not page Passiflora. sent11: the sovereign is not an almond if that the fact that the taboret is a kind of an almond that is a kind of a flamboyance is not false is incorrect. sent12: that the taboret is an almond and a flamboyance is not true. sent13: the sovereign is not a episiotomy. sent14: if the photometrist is not a intravasation the fact that it is not a kind of a episiotomy and it does not pledge is not right. sent15: something is not a kind of a intravasation if that it is uncousinly thing that is not a caudate is false. sent16: if something is not a intravasation then that the fact that it is not a pledged but a flamboyance hold does not hold.
sent15 -> int1: if that the photometrist is uncousinly but it is not caudate is false then it is not a kind of a intravasation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the photometrist is uncousinly but it is non-caudate does not hold is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the photometrist is not a intravasation.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the photometrist is not a kind of a episiotomy and it is not a pledged is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a episiotomy and not a pledged is wrong.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the adduct is not a kind of a blare.; sent11 & sent12 -> int6: that the sovereign is not a kind of an almond hold.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the sovereign is not a blare and it does not page Passiflora.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the adduct is a kind of a blare.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the photometrist is uncousinly but it is non-caudate.; int10 -> hypothesis;
that the taximeter is not a kind of a flamboyance is correct.
sent16 -> int11: that the adduct is not a pledged but it is a flamboyance is not right if it is not a kind of a intravasation.; sent7 -> int12: the adduct is not a intravasation and/or is not a kind of a episiotomy.;
$hypothesis$ = the photometrist is not a caudate. ; $context$ = sent1: the adduct is not a kind of a flamboyance. sent2: the sovereign does not page Passiflora if it is not a kind of an almond. sent3: the adduct is a blare if the sovereign is not a blare and does not page Passiflora. sent4: that the photometrist is not a episiotomy but it pledges does not hold. sent5: if something is a episiotomy it does pledge and it is not a intravasation. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a episiotomy and is not a pledged does not hold. sent7: the fact that everything is not a intravasation and/or it is not a episiotomy is right. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a episiotomy and is not a pledged does not hold then the adduct is not a blare. sent9: the fact that the photometrist is a episiotomy but it is not a kind of a pledged does not hold. sent10: if the sovereign is not an almond then it is not a blare and it does not page Passiflora. sent11: the sovereign is not an almond if that the fact that the taboret is a kind of an almond that is a kind of a flamboyance is not false is incorrect. sent12: that the taboret is an almond and a flamboyance is not true. sent13: the sovereign is not a episiotomy. sent14: if the photometrist is not a intravasation the fact that it is not a kind of a episiotomy and it does not pledge is not right. sent15: something is not a kind of a intravasation if that it is uncousinly thing that is not a caudate is false. sent16: if something is not a intravasation then that the fact that it is not a pledged but a flamboyance hold does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: if that the photometrist is uncousinly but it is not caudate is false then it is not a kind of a intravasation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that the photometrist is uncousinly but it is non-caudate does not hold is right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the photometrist is not a intravasation.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the photometrist is not a kind of a episiotomy and it is not a pledged is false.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not a episiotomy and not a pledged is wrong.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the adduct is not a kind of a blare.; sent11 & sent12 -> int6: that the sovereign is not a kind of an almond hold.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the sovereign is not a blare and it does not page Passiflora.; sent3 & int7 -> int8: the adduct is a kind of a blare.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the photometrist is uncousinly but it is non-caudate.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__