the suffering is prevented by that the decimalization occurs and the ironing happens.
sent1: the progression does not occur if the Semitic and the suffering happens. sent2: that the Semitic occurs is caused by the ironing. sent3: the inflexibleness does not occur. sent4: the mirage happens. sent5: that the suffering happens is not wrong if both the decimalization and the ironing happens. sent6: the progression happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decimalization occurs and the ironing occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the ironing happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Semiticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suffering occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Semitic happens and the suffering happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the progression does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the suffering does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the suffering is prevented by that the decimalization occurs and the ironing happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the progression does not occur if the Semitic and the suffering happens. sent2: that the Semitic occurs is caused by the ironing. sent3: the inflexibleness does not occur. sent4: the mirage happens. sent5: that the suffering happens is not wrong if both the decimalization and the ironing happens. sent6: the progression happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the decimalization occurs and the ironing occurs.; assump2 -> int1: the ironing happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the Semiticness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the suffering occurs.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the Semitic happens and the suffering happens.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the progression does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the suffering does not occur.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__