that if the change happens then that both the non-papalness and the triple happens is wrong does not hold.
sent1: the thanklessness does not occur and the vacating floor occurs. sent2: if the armillariness does not occur the contending does not occur but the vacating incaution happens. sent3: the fact that the fact that both the papalness and the triple occurs is not true hold if the billet does not occur. sent4: that the cricket does not occur is true. sent5: the fact that the replay does not occur but the fingering Nepal happens does not hold. sent6: the non-Eucharisticness is caused by that either the non-non-Eucharistic or the cricketing or both occurs. sent7: not the vacating resonance but the vacating floor happens. sent8: the laicizing motivation does not occur but the petalousness occurs if the vacating thermometry does not occur. sent9: if not the cricket but the changing happens the billet does not occur. sent10: if the billet does not occur then that both the non-papalness and the triple happens does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the change occurs hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the cricketing does not occur but the changing happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the billet does not occur.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the papalness but the triple occurs is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Eucharisticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that if the change happens then that both the non-papalness and the triple happens is wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the thanklessness does not occur and the vacating floor occurs. sent2: if the armillariness does not occur the contending does not occur but the vacating incaution happens. sent3: the fact that the fact that both the papalness and the triple occurs is not true hold if the billet does not occur. sent4: that the cricket does not occur is true. sent5: the fact that the replay does not occur but the fingering Nepal happens does not hold. sent6: the non-Eucharisticness is caused by that either the non-non-Eucharistic or the cricketing or both occurs. sent7: not the vacating resonance but the vacating floor happens. sent8: the laicizing motivation does not occur but the petalousness occurs if the vacating thermometry does not occur. sent9: if not the cricket but the changing happens the billet does not occur. sent10: if the billet does not occur then that both the non-papalness and the triple happens does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the change occurs hold.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the cricketing does not occur but the changing happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the billet does not occur.; sent10 & int2 -> int3: the fact that not the papalness but the triple occurs is wrong.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__