the fact that the heartwood is occlusive and it emends ectoplasm is not right.
sent1: something is a listing but it is not graphics if it is not a kind of a semasiology. sent2: if there are nonprehensile things the fact that the director does not emend manfulness but it is not non-spastic is not correct. sent3: if the kymograph ends but it does not kill then the camelhair is a semasiology. sent4: either the anticipator does jar rampart or it does not jar Andrews or both. sent5: if the kymograph is a Comstockery but not audible the fact that the winder ends is right. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not emend manfulness and is a spastic is wrong then the fact that the winder is not a spastic is not false. sent7: the fact that the coyote does not list is right if there exists something such that the fact that it does not emend manfulness and is non-spastic is not right. sent8: if something is a graphics it lists. sent9: if the winder is not a Comstockery the heartwood is occlusive thing that emends ectoplasm. sent10: the winder is not a Comstockery if the camelhair is not inaudible and/or it is a semasiology. sent11: if the anticipator does not jar Andrews then it is not prehensile. sent12: the winder is graphics. sent13: there is something such that that it does not emend manfulness and it is not a spastic is wrong. sent14: if the fact that the coyote lists but it is not a graphics is right then the kymograph is not a kind of a lists. sent15: if the anticipator jars rampart then that it is not prehensile is correct. sent16: if that the kymograph is an end but it does not kill does not hold then the coyote is a graphics. sent17: that the heartwood is occlusive thing that emends ectoplasm is false if the kymograph does not list.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the kymograph is an end and is not a kind of a kill is not true.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the coyote is a kind of a graphics.; sent8 -> int2: the coyote does list if it is a graphics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the coyote lists.; sent13 & sent7 -> int4: the coyote is not a listing.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the kymograph is an end but it does not kill.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the camelhair is a kind of a semasiology.; int7 -> int8: the camelhair either is audible or is a semasiology or both.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the winder is not a Comstockery.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the heartwood is a kind of occlusive thing that emends ectoplasm does not hold.
sent1 -> int10: the coyote is a listing but it is not a graphics if it is not a kind of a semasiology.; sent4 & sent15 & sent11 -> int11: the anticipator is not prehensile.; int11 -> int12: something is not prehensile.; int12 & sent2 -> int13: that the director does not emend manfulness but it is spastic is not correct.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that the fact that it does not emend manfulness and it is a spastic is not true.; int14 & sent6 -> int15: the winder is not a spastic.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that it is not a kind of a spastic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the heartwood is occlusive and it emends ectoplasm is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a listing but it is not graphics if it is not a kind of a semasiology. sent2: if there are nonprehensile things the fact that the director does not emend manfulness but it is not non-spastic is not correct. sent3: if the kymograph ends but it does not kill then the camelhair is a semasiology. sent4: either the anticipator does jar rampart or it does not jar Andrews or both. sent5: if the kymograph is a Comstockery but not audible the fact that the winder ends is right. sent6: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not emend manfulness and is a spastic is wrong then the fact that the winder is not a spastic is not false. sent7: the fact that the coyote does not list is right if there exists something such that the fact that it does not emend manfulness and is non-spastic is not right. sent8: if something is a graphics it lists. sent9: if the winder is not a Comstockery the heartwood is occlusive thing that emends ectoplasm. sent10: the winder is not a Comstockery if the camelhair is not inaudible and/or it is a semasiology. sent11: if the anticipator does not jar Andrews then it is not prehensile. sent12: the winder is graphics. sent13: there is something such that that it does not emend manfulness and it is not a spastic is wrong. sent14: if the fact that the coyote lists but it is not a graphics is right then the kymograph is not a kind of a lists. sent15: if the anticipator jars rampart then that it is not prehensile is correct. sent16: if that the kymograph is an end but it does not kill does not hold then the coyote is a graphics. sent17: that the heartwood is occlusive thing that emends ectoplasm is false if the kymograph does not list. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the kymograph is an end and is not a kind of a kill is not true.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the coyote is a kind of a graphics.; sent8 -> int2: the coyote does list if it is a graphics.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the coyote lists.; sent13 & sent7 -> int4: the coyote is not a listing.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the kymograph is an end but it does not kill.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the camelhair is a kind of a semasiology.; int7 -> int8: the camelhair either is audible or is a semasiology or both.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the winder is not a Comstockery.; int9 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__