that both the rehearsal and the nacreousness happens does not hold.
sent1: the deticking tongueflower happens if the dowsing but not the summarizing thereness occurs. sent2: if the deticking aikido occurs then the rehearsal happens. sent3: if the summarizing thereness occurs the deticking aikido happens. sent4: the deticking tongueflower occurs and/or the occasion does not occur. sent5: that the deticking tongueflower does not occur is caused by that the deticking tongueflower does not occur and/or that the occasioning does not occur. sent6: the match-up happens. sent7: if the uncared-forness does not occur then that the nacreousness happens and the rehearsal occurs is not right. sent8: that the nacreousness occurs is true. sent9: the deticking aikido happens if that the dowsing but not the summarizing thereness occurs does not hold. sent10: the deticking tongueflower does not occur or the occasion does not occur or both. sent11: the fact that the fact that both the dowsing and the summarizing thereness happens is not correct is not false. sent12: the electromagneticness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dowsing occurs but the summarizing thereness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the deticking tongueflower occurs is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the deticking tongueflower does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the dowse but not the summarizing thereness happens does not hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the deticking aikido happens.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the rehearsal happens is not false.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the K.E. occurs and the acting does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that both the rehearsal and the nacreousness happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the deticking tongueflower happens if the dowsing but not the summarizing thereness occurs. sent2: if the deticking aikido occurs then the rehearsal happens. sent3: if the summarizing thereness occurs the deticking aikido happens. sent4: the deticking tongueflower occurs and/or the occasion does not occur. sent5: that the deticking tongueflower does not occur is caused by that the deticking tongueflower does not occur and/or that the occasioning does not occur. sent6: the match-up happens. sent7: if the uncared-forness does not occur then that the nacreousness happens and the rehearsal occurs is not right. sent8: that the nacreousness occurs is true. sent9: the deticking aikido happens if that the dowsing but not the summarizing thereness occurs does not hold. sent10: the deticking tongueflower does not occur or the occasion does not occur or both. sent11: the fact that the fact that both the dowsing and the summarizing thereness happens is not correct is not false. sent12: the electromagneticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dowsing occurs but the summarizing thereness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the deticking tongueflower occurs is not incorrect.; sent5 & sent10 -> int2: the deticking tongueflower does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the dowse but not the summarizing thereness happens does not hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the deticking aikido happens.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: that the rehearsal happens is not false.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__