the cumulonimbus does not occur.
sent1: the sweetening repudiation does not occur. sent2: the fact that the cumulonimbus happens hold if that not the cumulonimbus but the bullfighting occurs is wrong. sent3: that not the sweetening repudiation but the intruding Pakistani happens is false if the nonspatialness does not occur. sent4: the hostilities happens. sent5: the bullfighting does not occur and the hostilities does not occur if the sweetening repudiation happens. sent6: not the sweetening repudiation but the bullfighting happens. sent7: the intruding Circinus does not occur. sent8: that the intussuscepting occurs and the intruding cotoneaster happens is wrong if the fact that the comforting anaphrodisia does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the hydrolyzing does not occur. sent10: the fact that the intruding Pakistani happens and the sweetening repudiation happens hold if the nonspatialness does not occur. sent11: the evidentiariness happens. sent12: if the fact that the sweetening repudiation does not occur and the intruding Pakistani happens is wrong then the hostilities does not occur. sent13: the staggering occurs if the fact that the staggering does not occur and the cumulonimbus does not occur is not right. sent14: if the hostilities does not occur then the fact that not the cumulonimbus but the bullfighting happens does not hold. sent15: that the bullfighting does not occur is caused by that both the hostilities and the cumulonimbus happens. sent16: if the hostilities does not occur that the staggering does not occur and the cumulonimbus does not occur is not correct. sent17: if that the intruding cotoneaster does not occur and the intussuscepting does not occur is not right then the nonspatialness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cumulonimbus happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the hostilities and the cumulonimbus occurs.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the bullfighting does not occur.; sent6 -> int3: the bullfighting happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the staggering happens.
$hypothesis$ = the cumulonimbus does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the sweetening repudiation does not occur. sent2: the fact that the cumulonimbus happens hold if that not the cumulonimbus but the bullfighting occurs is wrong. sent3: that not the sweetening repudiation but the intruding Pakistani happens is false if the nonspatialness does not occur. sent4: the hostilities happens. sent5: the bullfighting does not occur and the hostilities does not occur if the sweetening repudiation happens. sent6: not the sweetening repudiation but the bullfighting happens. sent7: the intruding Circinus does not occur. sent8: that the intussuscepting occurs and the intruding cotoneaster happens is wrong if the fact that the comforting anaphrodisia does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the hydrolyzing does not occur. sent10: the fact that the intruding Pakistani happens and the sweetening repudiation happens hold if the nonspatialness does not occur. sent11: the evidentiariness happens. sent12: if the fact that the sweetening repudiation does not occur and the intruding Pakistani happens is wrong then the hostilities does not occur. sent13: the staggering occurs if the fact that the staggering does not occur and the cumulonimbus does not occur is not right. sent14: if the hostilities does not occur then the fact that not the cumulonimbus but the bullfighting happens does not hold. sent15: that the bullfighting does not occur is caused by that both the hostilities and the cumulonimbus happens. sent16: if the hostilities does not occur that the staggering does not occur and the cumulonimbus does not occur is not correct. sent17: if that the intruding cotoneaster does not occur and the intussuscepting does not occur is not right then the nonspatialness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cumulonimbus happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the hostilities and the cumulonimbus occurs.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the bullfighting does not occur.; sent6 -> int3: the bullfighting happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__