the plumber is a kind of alexic thing that riffles Vatican.
sent1: the brodiaea does riffle Apogon. sent2: the fact that the corbel does not unseal separation and is not intrastate does not hold if the brodiaea is calyculate. sent3: the corbel does stink. sent4: the balsa is not calyculate. sent5: that the brodiaea is non-intrastate and it is not calyculate is not correct if the corbel stinks. sent6: if the brodiaea is calyculate that the corbel unseals separation and is not intrastate is not right. sent7: something does not stink if that it does not unseal separation and it is not intrastate is incorrect. sent8: the plumber is a kind of alexic thing that unseals separation. sent9: the plumber is alexic. sent10: the fact that the corbel does not unseal separation but it is intrastate is wrong. sent11: if that that the brodiaea is not calyculate and it is not intrastate is not correct is correct then it does not stink. sent12: if the brodiaea is not haptic the plumber is a kind of a alexic. sent13: if the fact that the corbel is haptic hold the fact that the brodiaea does not stink but it unseals separation is wrong. sent14: the fact that the brodiaea is not haptic if the brodiaea is not calyculate hold. sent15: the plumber is not a fetoscopy. sent16: if the brodiaea is not haptic then the plumber is a alexic and it does riffle Vatican. sent17: that the corbel does unseal separation but it is not intrastate does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brodiaea is calyculate.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the corbel does not unseal separation and it is not intrastate is not true.; sent7 -> int2: the corbel does not stink if the fact that it does not unseal separation and is not intrastate does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the corbel does not stink.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the brodiaea is not calyculate is right.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the brodiaea is not haptic.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the plumber is a kind of alexic thing that riffles Vatican. ; $context$ = sent1: the brodiaea does riffle Apogon. sent2: the fact that the corbel does not unseal separation and is not intrastate does not hold if the brodiaea is calyculate. sent3: the corbel does stink. sent4: the balsa is not calyculate. sent5: that the brodiaea is non-intrastate and it is not calyculate is not correct if the corbel stinks. sent6: if the brodiaea is calyculate that the corbel unseals separation and is not intrastate is not right. sent7: something does not stink if that it does not unseal separation and it is not intrastate is incorrect. sent8: the plumber is a kind of alexic thing that unseals separation. sent9: the plumber is alexic. sent10: the fact that the corbel does not unseal separation but it is intrastate is wrong. sent11: if that that the brodiaea is not calyculate and it is not intrastate is not correct is correct then it does not stink. sent12: if the brodiaea is not haptic the plumber is a kind of a alexic. sent13: if the fact that the corbel is haptic hold the fact that the brodiaea does not stink but it unseals separation is wrong. sent14: the fact that the brodiaea is not haptic if the brodiaea is not calyculate hold. sent15: the plumber is not a fetoscopy. sent16: if the brodiaea is not haptic then the plumber is a alexic and it does riffle Vatican. sent17: that the corbel does unseal separation but it is not intrastate does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brodiaea is calyculate.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the corbel does not unseal separation and it is not intrastate is not true.; sent7 -> int2: the corbel does not stink if the fact that it does not unseal separation and is not intrastate does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the corbel does not stink.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the brodiaea is not calyculate is right.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the brodiaea is not haptic.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__