the fact that there is something such that if it is not a thimble the fact that it is not a kind of a Shankar and does not distinguish schrod is not correct is not right.
sent1: if something is not a slice that it is not a boatyard and not parasitic is incorrect. sent2: if the fescue is not a thimble then the fact that it is not a Shankar and it does not distinguish schrod is false. sent3: that the schrod is not a Nauruan and it is not metastable is not true if it is a thimble. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a thimble then it is not a Shankar and it does not distinguish schrod. sent5: the fact that the catechist is not a Shankar and is not a kind of a galingale is true if it is not aft.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a slice then that it is not a boatyard and not parasitic is incorrect.
sent1 -> int1: that the waterfront is not a kind of a boatyard and it is not parasitic does not hold if it is not a kind of a slice.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a thimble the fact that it is not a kind of a Shankar and does not distinguish schrod is not correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a slice that it is not a boatyard and not parasitic is incorrect. sent2: if the fescue is not a thimble then the fact that it is not a Shankar and it does not distinguish schrod is false. sent3: that the schrod is not a Nauruan and it is not metastable is not true if it is a thimble. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a thimble then it is not a Shankar and it does not distinguish schrod. sent5: the fact that the catechist is not a Shankar and is not a kind of a galingale is true if it is not aft. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__