the danaid does not purr.
sent1: if the inflow is a Stoker the egotist is effortless. sent2: if something is effortless and it is an aging the danaid is a kind of a purr. sent3: the inflow does propose paraphrase and it is a Stoker. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of an aging. sent5: that the egotist is not a collective but it does age does not hold. sent6: the neoprene is not non-preclinical and it is a kind of a Stoker if the inflow does not propose paraphrase. sent7: the inflow proposes paraphrase. sent8: there exists something such that it is effortless. sent9: if that the egotist is non-collective thing that does not age does not hold it does age. sent10: that the egotist is a kind of non-collective thing that is not an aging is false. sent11: the inflow ages if the egotist is a Stoker.
sent3 -> int1: the inflow is a Stoker.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the egotist is effortless is not wrong.; sent9 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the egotist ages is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the egotist is effortless and it is an aging.; int4 -> int5: something is not effortful and it is an aging.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the neoprene is preclinical and a Stoker.
$hypothesis$ = the danaid does not purr. ; $context$ = sent1: if the inflow is a Stoker the egotist is effortless. sent2: if something is effortless and it is an aging the danaid is a kind of a purr. sent3: the inflow does propose paraphrase and it is a Stoker. sent4: there is something such that it is a kind of an aging. sent5: that the egotist is not a collective but it does age does not hold. sent6: the neoprene is not non-preclinical and it is a kind of a Stoker if the inflow does not propose paraphrase. sent7: the inflow proposes paraphrase. sent8: there exists something such that it is effortless. sent9: if that the egotist is non-collective thing that does not age does not hold it does age. sent10: that the egotist is a kind of non-collective thing that is not an aging is false. sent11: the inflow ages if the egotist is a Stoker. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the inflow is a Stoker.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the egotist is effortless is not wrong.; sent9 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that the egotist ages is not incorrect.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the egotist is effortless and it is an aging.; int4 -> int5: something is not effortful and it is an aging.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__