the dimple is not remediable.
sent1: the dimple is not aspectual. sent2: the radiance is not remediable. sent3: the dimple is not remediable if the fact that that the stockman is not mensal and it is not a Verdun does not hold is true. sent4: the dimple is a kind of a souffle that is remediable if it is not a catchment. sent5: if something is not a souffle then the fact that it is not mensal and it is not a Verdun does not hold. sent6: that the stockman is not mensal but it is a Verdun is not correct if it is not a souffle. sent7: that the stockman is either not a tusked or a catchment or both is wrong. sent8: the stockman is not a souffle if that either it is not a kind of a tusked or it is a catchment or both is wrong. sent9: the draft shillyshallies Lavoisier and is not a tusked if it is not a backblast.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the stockman is not mensal and it is not a kind of a Verdun is not correct if it is not a souffle.; sent8 & sent7 -> int2: the stockman is not a souffle.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stockman is not mensal and is not a Verdun is incorrect.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
that the dimple is remediable is correct.
$hypothesis$ = the dimple is not remediable. ; $context$ = sent1: the dimple is not aspectual. sent2: the radiance is not remediable. sent3: the dimple is not remediable if the fact that that the stockman is not mensal and it is not a Verdun does not hold is true. sent4: the dimple is a kind of a souffle that is remediable if it is not a catchment. sent5: if something is not a souffle then the fact that it is not mensal and it is not a Verdun does not hold. sent6: that the stockman is not mensal but it is a Verdun is not correct if it is not a souffle. sent7: that the stockman is either not a tusked or a catchment or both is wrong. sent8: the stockman is not a souffle if that either it is not a kind of a tusked or it is a catchment or both is wrong. sent9: the draft shillyshallies Lavoisier and is not a tusked if it is not a backblast. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the fact that the stockman is not mensal and it is not a kind of a Verdun is not correct if it is not a souffle.; sent8 & sent7 -> int2: the stockman is not a souffle.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the stockman is not mensal and is not a Verdun is incorrect.; int3 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__