the tuner is a kind of a airgun that is fingerless.
sent1: the congressman axes Ochna and/or it is legless if the fact that the blubber does not elaborate ammonification hold. sent2: if the tuner does not concur that the congressman is fingerless and concur does not hold. sent3: something does not change and/or does not elaborate ammonification. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that either it is a kind of a change or it does not elaborate ammonification or both is not correct. sent5: the tuner is fingerless but it is not a mount if the welterweight does axe loathsomeness. sent6: if that something axes loathsomeness is true that it is a Aconcagua and/or it does not concur is not correct. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Tyler and is a jacks is wrong then it does not concur. sent8: if the tuner is not a kind of a Tyler the congressman is a airgun. sent9: if the congressman is not a jacks it does not concur. sent10: if the welterweight is legless then the blubber is not a Aconcagua. sent11: the casuist does not axe Ochna if the congressman does not concur. sent12: the fact that the blubber does axe loathsomeness but it is not a kind of a Aconcagua does not hold if the congressman is not a kind of a Aconcagua. sent13: the blubber is not a Aconcagua. sent14: the fact that the blubber axes loathsomeness and is a Aconcagua is incorrect. sent15: the tuner axes Ochna. sent16: if the casuist does not axe Ochna the fact that the tuner is a airgun is right. sent17: if the blubber is not a kind of a airgun the tuner is a Aconcagua. sent18: the welterweight is legless a mount. sent19: something is not a kind of a airgun if that it either is a kind of a Aconcagua or does not concur or both is wrong. sent20: something is a change. sent21: if the congressman is not a kind of a Tyler and is a jacks the fact that it is not a Aconcagua is not wrong. sent22: something does not concur if it is not a kind of a jacks. sent23: the tuner is fingerless if there exists something such that that it is not a change or it does not elaborate ammonification or both is not right. sent24: the storybook does mount. sent25: there is something such that the fact that it does not change and/or it does not elaborate ammonification does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the congressman is not a Tyler but it jacks.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the congressman is not a Aconcagua.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the blubber does axe loathsomeness and is not a Aconcagua is false.; sent18 -> int3: the welterweight is legless.; sent7 -> int4: if that the congressman is not a Tyler but it is a jacks is not true it does not concur.; sent25 & sent23 -> int5: the tuner is fingerless.;
the fact that the tuner is a kind of a airgun and is fingerless does not hold.
sent19 -> int6: if the fact that either the congressman is a kind of a Aconcagua or it does not concur or both is not correct then it is not a airgun.; sent6 -> int7: if the fact that the congressman does axe loathsomeness is right then the fact that it is a Aconcagua and/or does not concur is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the tuner is a kind of a airgun that is fingerless. ; $context$ = sent1: the congressman axes Ochna and/or it is legless if the fact that the blubber does not elaborate ammonification hold. sent2: if the tuner does not concur that the congressman is fingerless and concur does not hold. sent3: something does not change and/or does not elaborate ammonification. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that either it is a kind of a change or it does not elaborate ammonification or both is not correct. sent5: the tuner is fingerless but it is not a mount if the welterweight does axe loathsomeness. sent6: if that something axes loathsomeness is true that it is a Aconcagua and/or it does not concur is not correct. sent7: if the fact that something is not a Tyler and is a jacks is wrong then it does not concur. sent8: if the tuner is not a kind of a Tyler the congressman is a airgun. sent9: if the congressman is not a jacks it does not concur. sent10: if the welterweight is legless then the blubber is not a Aconcagua. sent11: the casuist does not axe Ochna if the congressman does not concur. sent12: the fact that the blubber does axe loathsomeness but it is not a kind of a Aconcagua does not hold if the congressman is not a kind of a Aconcagua. sent13: the blubber is not a Aconcagua. sent14: the fact that the blubber axes loathsomeness and is a Aconcagua is incorrect. sent15: the tuner axes Ochna. sent16: if the casuist does not axe Ochna the fact that the tuner is a airgun is right. sent17: if the blubber is not a kind of a airgun the tuner is a Aconcagua. sent18: the welterweight is legless a mount. sent19: something is not a kind of a airgun if that it either is a kind of a Aconcagua or does not concur or both is wrong. sent20: something is a change. sent21: if the congressman is not a kind of a Tyler and is a jacks the fact that it is not a Aconcagua is not wrong. sent22: something does not concur if it is not a kind of a jacks. sent23: the tuner is fingerless if there exists something such that that it is not a change or it does not elaborate ammonification or both is not right. sent24: the storybook does mount. sent25: there is something such that the fact that it does not change and/or it does not elaborate ammonification does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the congressman is not a Tyler but it jacks.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the congressman is not a Aconcagua.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the blubber does axe loathsomeness and is not a Aconcagua is false.; sent18 -> int3: the welterweight is legless.; sent7 -> int4: if that the congressman is not a Tyler but it is a jacks is not true it does not concur.; sent25 & sent23 -> int5: the tuner is fingerless.; __UNKNOWN__