there exists something such that the fact that it is a garnet and it is a magpie is not correct.
sent1: something is not monotypic if that it does not consort assenter and it is a kind of a assize is not right. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a garnet but it consorts scepter is not true if it consorts assenter. sent3: there exists something such that it is both a spirogram and an opened. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does decompress and is inadvisable is not true hold. sent5: if there is something such that that that it does not consort Dortmund and it is not a alpha-adrenoceptor hold is not correct then the spat consorts assenter. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does not consort Dortmund and is not a alpha-adrenoceptor does not hold. sent7: if the spat does consort assenter that the telencephalon does not consort assenter and is a kind of a assize is wrong.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the spat consorts assenter.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the telencephalon does not consort assenter but it is a assize is not right.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the telencephalon does not consort assenter but it is a assize is not right it is not monotypic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the telencephalon is not monotypic.;
the fact that the telencephalon is not a garnet but it does consort scepter is false.
sent2 -> int5: if the telencephalon consorts assenter then that it is not a kind of a garnet and it does consort scepter is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is a garnet and it is a magpie is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not monotypic if that it does not consort assenter and it is a kind of a assize is not right. sent2: the fact that something is not a kind of a garnet but it consorts scepter is not true if it consorts assenter. sent3: there exists something such that it is both a spirogram and an opened. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does decompress and is inadvisable is not true hold. sent5: if there is something such that that that it does not consort Dortmund and it is not a alpha-adrenoceptor hold is not correct then the spat consorts assenter. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it does not consort Dortmund and is not a alpha-adrenoceptor does not hold. sent7: if the spat does consort assenter that the telencephalon does not consort assenter and is a kind of a assize is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the spat consorts assenter.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the telencephalon does not consort assenter but it is a assize is not right.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the telencephalon does not consort assenter but it is a assize is not right it is not monotypic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the telencephalon is not monotypic.; __UNKNOWN__