the fact that if the revisionist is a downrightness and is not a kind of a boards that the suppressant is heteroecious is not false is not true.
sent1: if the revisionist is not a larvicide but it is a people then the suppressant is heteroecious. sent2: if the revisionist is a kind of a downrightness and it boards then it is not a larvicide. sent3: if the revisionist is a downrightness and does board then the suppressant is heteroecious. sent4: the revisionist is not a boards. sent5: The processing does braid revisionist. sent6: the revisionist does braid processing. sent7: if the mink is not a popularity and does not braid processing then the rouge does not braid processing. sent8: the revisionist is a people if it braids processing. sent9: the revisionist is not a larvicide if it is a downrightness that does not board. sent10: the suppressant braids processing. sent11: the revisionist is a downrightness. sent12: the fact that the suppressant is both a people and a larvicide is wrong if the rouge does not braid processing.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the revisionist is a kind of a downrightness but it is not a boards.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the revisionist is not a kind of a larvicide.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: the revisionist peoples.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the revisionist is not a kind of a larvicide and is a kind of a people.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the suppressant is heteroecious.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the revisionist is heteroecious.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the revisionist is a downrightness and is not a kind of a boards that the suppressant is heteroecious is not false is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the revisionist is not a larvicide but it is a people then the suppressant is heteroecious. sent2: if the revisionist is a kind of a downrightness and it boards then it is not a larvicide. sent3: if the revisionist is a downrightness and does board then the suppressant is heteroecious. sent4: the revisionist is not a boards. sent5: The processing does braid revisionist. sent6: the revisionist does braid processing. sent7: if the mink is not a popularity and does not braid processing then the rouge does not braid processing. sent8: the revisionist is a people if it braids processing. sent9: the revisionist is not a larvicide if it is a downrightness that does not board. sent10: the suppressant braids processing. sent11: the revisionist is a downrightness. sent12: the fact that the suppressant is both a people and a larvicide is wrong if the rouge does not braid processing. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the revisionist is a kind of a downrightness but it is not a boards.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the revisionist is not a kind of a larvicide.; sent8 & sent6 -> int2: the revisionist peoples.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the revisionist is not a kind of a larvicide and is a kind of a people.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the suppressant is heteroecious.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__