the lode japans Canute.
sent1: if the lode does not sensitize Epinephelus it is an albatross. sent2: the fact that the stag is not ugly is not false. sent3: if something is a kind of a Budge it does japan Canute. sent4: if the stag is a saline then it is ugly. sent5: if that something does sensitize Epinephelus but it is not intolerant is not correct the fact that it is an albatross is not false. sent6: the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine but it does toll if the fact that the decoy is not a kind of a saline is not false. sent7: that the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine and is not a kind of a saline does not hold if the lode is not a toll. sent8: if that the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine and it is not a kind of a saline does not hold it is ugly. sent9: if something does not sensitize Epinephelus then it is a kind of an albatross. sent10: everything is plausible and does not contribute playlet. sent11: something is a kind of a Budge if it bespangles pseudoephedrine and is not a kind of a toll. sent12: something contributes Quapaw if it scents. sent13: if something does sensitize Epinephelus and is not intolerant then it is not a toll. sent14: the fact that the decoy is not a saline is right if there exists something such that either it is ugly or it is an albatross or both.
sent13 -> int1: the lode is not a toll if it does sensitize Epinephelus and is not intolerant.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lode sensitizes Epinephelus but it is not intolerant.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the lode does not toll is true.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine and it is not a saline is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the stag is ugly.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the lode does sensitize Epinephelus but it is not intolerant is not true.; sent5 -> int7: the lode is a kind of an albatross if that it does sensitize Epinephelus and is not intolerant is wrong.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lode is an albatross.; sent3 -> int9: the lode does japan Canute if it is a Budge.;
the lode does not japan Canute.
sent10 -> int10: the basalt is plausible thing that does not contribute playlet.; int10 -> int11: the basalt does not contribute playlet.; int11 -> int12: everything does not contribute playlet.; int12 -> int13: that the myometrium does not contribute playlet is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the lode japans Canute. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lode does not sensitize Epinephelus it is an albatross. sent2: the fact that the stag is not ugly is not false. sent3: if something is a kind of a Budge it does japan Canute. sent4: if the stag is a saline then it is ugly. sent5: if that something does sensitize Epinephelus but it is not intolerant is not correct the fact that it is an albatross is not false. sent6: the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine but it does toll if the fact that the decoy is not a kind of a saline is not false. sent7: that the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine and is not a kind of a saline does not hold if the lode is not a toll. sent8: if that the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine and it is not a kind of a saline does not hold it is ugly. sent9: if something does not sensitize Epinephelus then it is a kind of an albatross. sent10: everything is plausible and does not contribute playlet. sent11: something is a kind of a Budge if it bespangles pseudoephedrine and is not a kind of a toll. sent12: something contributes Quapaw if it scents. sent13: if something does sensitize Epinephelus and is not intolerant then it is not a toll. sent14: the fact that the decoy is not a saline is right if there exists something such that either it is ugly or it is an albatross or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the lode is not a toll if it does sensitize Epinephelus and is not intolerant.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lode sensitizes Epinephelus but it is not intolerant.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the lode does not toll is true.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the fact that the stag does not bespangle pseudoephedrine and it is not a saline is not correct.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: the stag is ugly.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the lode does sensitize Epinephelus but it is not intolerant is not true.; sent5 -> int7: the lode is a kind of an albatross if that it does sensitize Epinephelus and is not intolerant is wrong.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the lode is an albatross.; sent3 -> int9: the lode does japan Canute if it is a Budge.; __UNKNOWN__