that the fact that the muskmelon does not force Fulani but it is alphabetic is not false does not hold.
sent1: a gravel purifies brainwave. sent2: the julep is translunar and scourges fetch. sent3: the snipefish either is not dysgenic or scourges nonequivalence or both if the fact that it is not a stain is true. sent4: if something is translunar that it is not a kind of a Apogonidae and it does not purify adenovirus is not correct. sent5: the milling does force Fulani if the adenovirus purifies brainwave. sent6: if the snipefish is not a Apogonidae the julep is not a Apogonidae and does not purify adenovirus. sent7: if the milling does force Fulani the fact that the muskmelon does not force Fulani but it is alphabetic is not right. sent8: something is not a Apogonidae if either it is not dysgenic or it scourges nonequivalence or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snipefish is not a kind of a stain.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: either the snipefish is not dysgenic or it scourges nonequivalence or both.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that either the snipefish is not dysgenic or it does scourge nonequivalence or both hold then it is not a Apogonidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the snipefish is not a kind of a Apogonidae is not false.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the julep is not a kind of a Apogonidae and it does not purify adenovirus.; sent4 -> int5: if the julep is translunar that it is not a Apogonidae and does not purify adenovirus is not true.; sent2 -> int6: the julep is translunar.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the julep is not a Apogonidae and does not purify adenovirus is wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the snipefish is a stain.; sent1 -> int10: the adenovirus does purify brainwave if it is a gravel.;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the muskmelon does not force Fulani but it is alphabetic is not false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: a gravel purifies brainwave. sent2: the julep is translunar and scourges fetch. sent3: the snipefish either is not dysgenic or scourges nonequivalence or both if the fact that it is not a stain is true. sent4: if something is translunar that it is not a kind of a Apogonidae and it does not purify adenovirus is not correct. sent5: the milling does force Fulani if the adenovirus purifies brainwave. sent6: if the snipefish is not a Apogonidae the julep is not a Apogonidae and does not purify adenovirus. sent7: if the milling does force Fulani the fact that the muskmelon does not force Fulani but it is alphabetic is not right. sent8: something is not a Apogonidae if either it is not dysgenic or it scourges nonequivalence or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the snipefish is not a kind of a stain.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: either the snipefish is not dysgenic or it scourges nonequivalence or both.; sent8 -> int2: if the fact that either the snipefish is not dysgenic or it does scourge nonequivalence or both hold then it is not a Apogonidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the snipefish is not a kind of a Apogonidae is not false.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the julep is not a kind of a Apogonidae and it does not purify adenovirus.; sent4 -> int5: if the julep is translunar that it is not a Apogonidae and does not purify adenovirus is not true.; sent2 -> int6: the julep is translunar.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the julep is not a Apogonidae and does not purify adenovirus is wrong.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the snipefish is a stain.; sent1 -> int10: the adenovirus does purify brainwave if it is a gravel.; __UNKNOWN__