the Rock is not non-calm.
sent1: if that something is a siphonophore and it is a eye-lotion is not true it is not incommensurate. sent2: something does not officialize cruet-stand if that it is not a certificated is right. sent3: that the sphenion is not a certificated but it is incommensurate does not hold if the pepperwood is not incommensurate. sent4: the fob is autogamous. sent5: the fact that the fob is not non-autogamous is not false if the pepperwood is incommensurate. sent6: the pepperwood is not a kind of a siphonophore if the fact that it is not a CPR is right. sent7: if the fact that something is a siphonophore that is non-autogamous does not hold then it does not officialize cruet-stand. sent8: if something is a kind of non-autogamous thing that is incommensurate it does not officialize cruet-stand. sent9: that the pepperwood is a siphonophore and it is a kind of a eye-lotion is false if the fob is not a kind of a siphonophore. sent10: if that something is a stonecrop and is a CPR is not true then it does not officialize cruet-stand. sent11: if the enjoyer does not officialize cruet-stand then the fob is autogamous. sent12: the pepperwood is a eye-lotion and is a kind of a certificated. sent13: something does not officialize cruet-stand if it is not a CPR. sent14: the fact that the fob is not a kind of a eye-lotion is correct if the fact that the pepperwood is non-calm but it is a kind of a siphonophore does not hold. sent15: there exists nothing such that it is a stonecrop and it is a CPR. sent16: the Rock is not a kind of a calm if that the sphenion is not a certificated but it is incommensurate is incorrect. sent17: the fob is autogamous and is not a kind of a siphonophore if the enjoyer does not officialize cruet-stand.
sent10 -> int1: if that the enjoyer is a stonecrop and it is a CPR is not right then it does not officialize cruet-stand.; sent15 -> int2: the fact that the enjoyer is a kind of a stonecrop that is a CPR is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the enjoyer does not officialize cruet-stand.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fob is autogamous and is not a siphonophore.; int4 -> int5: the fob is not a kind of a siphonophore.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the pepperwood is a siphonophore and is a kind of a eye-lotion is not correct.; sent1 -> int7: the pepperwood is commensurate if that it is a siphonophore and it is a eye-lotion does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pepperwood is not incommensurate.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: that the sphenion is not a certificated but incommensurate does not hold.; int9 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Rock is calm is true.
sent8 -> int10: the fob does not officialize cruet-stand if the fact that it is non-autogamous but not commensurate is correct.; sent12 -> int11: the fact that the pepperwood is a kind of a eye-lotion is not incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is a eye-lotion.;
$hypothesis$ = the Rock is not non-calm. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is a siphonophore and it is a eye-lotion is not true it is not incommensurate. sent2: something does not officialize cruet-stand if that it is not a certificated is right. sent3: that the sphenion is not a certificated but it is incommensurate does not hold if the pepperwood is not incommensurate. sent4: the fob is autogamous. sent5: the fact that the fob is not non-autogamous is not false if the pepperwood is incommensurate. sent6: the pepperwood is not a kind of a siphonophore if the fact that it is not a CPR is right. sent7: if the fact that something is a siphonophore that is non-autogamous does not hold then it does not officialize cruet-stand. sent8: if something is a kind of non-autogamous thing that is incommensurate it does not officialize cruet-stand. sent9: that the pepperwood is a siphonophore and it is a kind of a eye-lotion is false if the fob is not a kind of a siphonophore. sent10: if that something is a stonecrop and is a CPR is not true then it does not officialize cruet-stand. sent11: if the enjoyer does not officialize cruet-stand then the fob is autogamous. sent12: the pepperwood is a eye-lotion and is a kind of a certificated. sent13: something does not officialize cruet-stand if it is not a CPR. sent14: the fact that the fob is not a kind of a eye-lotion is correct if the fact that the pepperwood is non-calm but it is a kind of a siphonophore does not hold. sent15: there exists nothing such that it is a stonecrop and it is a CPR. sent16: the Rock is not a kind of a calm if that the sphenion is not a certificated but it is incommensurate is incorrect. sent17: the fob is autogamous and is not a kind of a siphonophore if the enjoyer does not officialize cruet-stand. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if that the enjoyer is a stonecrop and it is a CPR is not right then it does not officialize cruet-stand.; sent15 -> int2: the fact that the enjoyer is a kind of a stonecrop that is a CPR is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the enjoyer does not officialize cruet-stand.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fob is autogamous and is not a siphonophore.; int4 -> int5: the fob is not a kind of a siphonophore.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the pepperwood is a siphonophore and is a kind of a eye-lotion is not correct.; sent1 -> int7: the pepperwood is commensurate if that it is a siphonophore and it is a eye-lotion does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the pepperwood is not incommensurate.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: that the sphenion is not a certificated but incommensurate does not hold.; int9 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__