the pulsation is not a kind of a soaking.
sent1: the oleander is a Jagannath if it hennas and does not simmer. sent2: the forequarter does not spot jaggedness. sent3: The jaggedness does not spot forequarter. sent4: if something that is not a henna is not a simmer then it is a kind of a Jagannath. sent5: the pulsation is a Jagannath. sent6: the oleander does not spot jaggedness and it is not a henna. sent7: if the oleander is a kind of a implausibility then the pulsation is a kind of a soaking. sent8: the pulsation hennas. sent9: the fact that something is not a Jagannath but it soaks is incorrect if it spots jaggedness. sent10: that the forequarter does fudge pulsation is correct. sent11: something is economics if it does not fudge town and it does not spot jittering. sent12: the forequarter is not a Jagannath. sent13: if something is a henna and not a simmer then the fact that it is a Jagannath is not false. sent14: if the forequarter does not spot jaggedness then the oleander does not henna. sent15: if the forequarter does not spot jaggedness the oleander is not a henna and not a simmer. sent16: the oleander is not a henna. sent17: the oleander is a kind of a implausibility if it is a Jagannath.
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: the oleander is not a henna and it does not simmer.; sent4 -> int2: the oleander is a Jagannath if it is not a henna and not a simmer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oleander is a kind of a Jagannath.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the oleander is a implausibility.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the pulsation is not a kind of a soaking.
sent9 -> int5: if the forequarter does spot jaggedness the fact that it is not a Jagannath and does soak is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the pulsation is not a kind of a soaking. ; $context$ = sent1: the oleander is a Jagannath if it hennas and does not simmer. sent2: the forequarter does not spot jaggedness. sent3: The jaggedness does not spot forequarter. sent4: if something that is not a henna is not a simmer then it is a kind of a Jagannath. sent5: the pulsation is a Jagannath. sent6: the oleander does not spot jaggedness and it is not a henna. sent7: if the oleander is a kind of a implausibility then the pulsation is a kind of a soaking. sent8: the pulsation hennas. sent9: the fact that something is not a Jagannath but it soaks is incorrect if it spots jaggedness. sent10: that the forequarter does fudge pulsation is correct. sent11: something is economics if it does not fudge town and it does not spot jittering. sent12: the forequarter is not a Jagannath. sent13: if something is a henna and not a simmer then the fact that it is a Jagannath is not false. sent14: if the forequarter does not spot jaggedness then the oleander does not henna. sent15: if the forequarter does not spot jaggedness the oleander is not a henna and not a simmer. sent16: the oleander is not a henna. sent17: the oleander is a kind of a implausibility if it is a Jagannath. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent2 -> int1: the oleander is not a henna and it does not simmer.; sent4 -> int2: the oleander is a Jagannath if it is not a henna and not a simmer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the oleander is a kind of a Jagannath.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the oleander is a implausibility.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__