the endocardium does mist.
sent1: the prayer is an acceleration that is not amblyopic. sent2: if the fact that something is not imperial and it is not a kind of a idiolatry does not hold the fact that it is imperial is not incorrect. sent3: if there is something such that that it is both a huitre and a ply is wrong the prayer is not a huitre. sent4: something does mist if it is amblyopic. sent5: the prayer is not amblyopic. sent6: the fact that something is not an imperial and it is not a idiolatry does not hold if it is not a huitre. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not sediment Geum then that the novice does not teach Delphinidae or is a nonmetal or both is incorrect. sent8: something does not outshout disadvantage but it is an oncologist if it is an imperial. sent9: the prayer is plumbaginaceous. sent10: if the fact that the novice does not teach Delphinidae and/or it is a nonmetal is wrong it lashes. sent11: if something is a lash it is not yeasty. sent12: the horseback does outshout disadvantage. sent13: the coalface does not teach counterattraction and it is not a kind of a propjet if the novice is not yeasty. sent14: that the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage is true if the prayer is an acceleration and it is amblyopic. sent15: the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage if the prayer is a kind of an acceleration that is not amblyopic. sent16: the prayer is not an oncologist if the endocardium is amblyopic but not an acceleration. sent17: something is a mist if it is an oncologist. sent18: if the coalface does not teach counterattraction and it is not a propjet the WMD is not a propjet. sent19: something does not sediment Geum. sent20: the fact that the WMD is a kind of a huitre and it plies is not correct if it is not a propjet. sent21: something is a kind of an oncologist if it does not outshout disadvantage.
sent15 & sent1 -> int1: the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage.; sent21 -> int2: if the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage then it is an oncologist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the endocardium is an oncologist.; sent17 -> int4: the endocardium does mist if it is an oncologist.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the endocardium is not a mist.
sent8 -> int5: the prayer does not outshout disadvantage but it is an oncologist if it is a kind of an imperial.; sent2 -> int6: if that the prayer is not an imperial and not a idiolatry is not true it is an imperial.; sent6 -> int7: the fact that the prayer is not imperial and not a idiolatry does not hold if it is not a huitre.; sent11 -> int8: the novice is not yeasty if it does lash.; sent19 & sent7 -> int9: that the novice does not teach Delphinidae or is a kind of a nonmetal or both does not hold.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the novice lashes.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the novice is not yeasty.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the coalface does not teach counterattraction and it is not a kind of a propjet.; sent18 & int12 -> int13: the WMD is not a kind of a propjet.; sent20 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the WMD is a huitre and it is a ply is not correct.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a huitre and it is a ply does not hold.; int15 & sent3 -> int16: the prayer is not a kind of a huitre.; int7 & int16 -> int17: the fact that the prayer is not an imperial and it is not a idiolatry is not true.; int6 & int17 -> int18: the prayer is a kind of an imperial.; int5 & int18 -> int19: the prayer does not outshout disadvantage but it is an oncologist.; int19 -> int20: that something does not outshout disadvantage and is an oncologist is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the endocardium does mist. ; $context$ = sent1: the prayer is an acceleration that is not amblyopic. sent2: if the fact that something is not imperial and it is not a kind of a idiolatry does not hold the fact that it is imperial is not incorrect. sent3: if there is something such that that it is both a huitre and a ply is wrong the prayer is not a huitre. sent4: something does mist if it is amblyopic. sent5: the prayer is not amblyopic. sent6: the fact that something is not an imperial and it is not a idiolatry does not hold if it is not a huitre. sent7: if there exists something such that it does not sediment Geum then that the novice does not teach Delphinidae or is a nonmetal or both is incorrect. sent8: something does not outshout disadvantage but it is an oncologist if it is an imperial. sent9: the prayer is plumbaginaceous. sent10: if the fact that the novice does not teach Delphinidae and/or it is a nonmetal is wrong it lashes. sent11: if something is a lash it is not yeasty. sent12: the horseback does outshout disadvantage. sent13: the coalface does not teach counterattraction and it is not a kind of a propjet if the novice is not yeasty. sent14: that the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage is true if the prayer is an acceleration and it is amblyopic. sent15: the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage if the prayer is a kind of an acceleration that is not amblyopic. sent16: the prayer is not an oncologist if the endocardium is amblyopic but not an acceleration. sent17: something is a mist if it is an oncologist. sent18: if the coalface does not teach counterattraction and it is not a propjet the WMD is not a propjet. sent19: something does not sediment Geum. sent20: the fact that the WMD is a kind of a huitre and it plies is not correct if it is not a propjet. sent21: something is a kind of an oncologist if it does not outshout disadvantage. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent1 -> int1: the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage.; sent21 -> int2: if the endocardium does not outshout disadvantage then it is an oncologist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the endocardium is an oncologist.; sent17 -> int4: the endocardium does mist if it is an oncologist.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__