both the amphotericness and the Hindustani happens.
sent1: if the tonalness does not occur then the sniffing opposition does not occur and the loping does not occur. sent2: both the invertibleness and the sniffing statesman occurs. sent3: the mimicry does not occur. sent4: that the emptying Caloocan does not occur is prevented by that the emptying Caloocan happens or that the tonalness does not occur or both. sent5: the sniffing professional does not occur. sent6: that the emptying admiration occurs and the diclinousness occurs is wrong. sent7: that the spam occurs is not wrong. sent8: the quarterfinal happens and the purr occurs. sent9: if the sniffing opposition does not occur then the Hindustani occurs but the sniffing professional does not occur. sent10: the proctoplasty does not occur if the diclinousness does not occur. sent11: that the arrangement does not occur and the wingback does not occur is triggered by that the consolidating Chapman does not occur. sent12: the moneylessness does not occur. sent13: that the fact that the proctoplasty does not occur but the tonalness occurs is not incorrect does not hold if the mimicry does not occur. sent14: the modernism does not occur. sent15: the upheaval does not occur if the fact that both the cardinalship and the mocking happens does not hold. sent16: the loping does not occur. sent17: the Samoanness but not the emptying pigeon happens. sent18: if the stimulativeness does not occur the fact that the nonmodernness does not occur is correct. sent19: if the tonalness does not occur the loping does not occur. sent20: the fact that the sniffing professional does not occur is correct if the sniffing opposition does not occur. sent21: the amphotericness and the non-moneylessness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tonalness happens.; sent13 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the proctoplasty does not occur and the tonalness occurs is not right.; sent21 -> int2: the amphotericness occurs.;
the emptying Caloocan occurs.
$hypothesis$ = both the amphotericness and the Hindustani happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tonalness does not occur then the sniffing opposition does not occur and the loping does not occur. sent2: both the invertibleness and the sniffing statesman occurs. sent3: the mimicry does not occur. sent4: that the emptying Caloocan does not occur is prevented by that the emptying Caloocan happens or that the tonalness does not occur or both. sent5: the sniffing professional does not occur. sent6: that the emptying admiration occurs and the diclinousness occurs is wrong. sent7: that the spam occurs is not wrong. sent8: the quarterfinal happens and the purr occurs. sent9: if the sniffing opposition does not occur then the Hindustani occurs but the sniffing professional does not occur. sent10: the proctoplasty does not occur if the diclinousness does not occur. sent11: that the arrangement does not occur and the wingback does not occur is triggered by that the consolidating Chapman does not occur. sent12: the moneylessness does not occur. sent13: that the fact that the proctoplasty does not occur but the tonalness occurs is not incorrect does not hold if the mimicry does not occur. sent14: the modernism does not occur. sent15: the upheaval does not occur if the fact that both the cardinalship and the mocking happens does not hold. sent16: the loping does not occur. sent17: the Samoanness but not the emptying pigeon happens. sent18: if the stimulativeness does not occur the fact that the nonmodernness does not occur is correct. sent19: if the tonalness does not occur the loping does not occur. sent20: the fact that the sniffing professional does not occur is correct if the sniffing opposition does not occur. sent21: the amphotericness and the non-moneylessness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tonalness happens.; sent13 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the proctoplasty does not occur and the tonalness occurs is not right.; sent21 -> int2: the amphotericness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__