that both the non-knowableness and the confutation happens does not hold.
sent1: that both the cyclone and the non-hymenalness occurs is not true if the scandalization does not occur. sent2: that the remonstrating antimycin does not occur and the remonstrating document does not occur is false if the cannulation happens. sent3: that the intercession does not occur and the Cameroonianness does not occur results in the unknowableness. sent4: the prorogation occurs. sent5: the fact that the sportiveness happens hold if that the cyclone and the non-hymenalness happens is not true. sent6: if the sportiveness happens the cannulation occurs. sent7: the scandalization does not occur if the fact that that the scandalization occurs and the introduction does not occur is true is wrong. sent8: that the Cameroonianness does not occur is true. sent9: the prorogation and the confutation occurs. sent10: the fact that the prorogation does not occur is not wrong if that the remonstrating antimycin does not occur and the remonstrating document does not occur is not right. sent11: the intercession does not occur and the Cameroonian does not occur. sent12: the semanticness occurs and the argenticness occurs. sent13: if the spitter happens then that the scandalization but not the introduction occurs is wrong. sent14: the syllogizing tippler does not occur if the backlash does not occur but the syllogizing pentacle occurs. sent15: if the prorogation does not occur that the knowableness does not occur and the confutation occurs is false.
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the knowableness does not occur.; sent9 -> int2: the confutation occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the non-knowableness and the confutation occurs is false.
$hypothesis$ = that both the non-knowableness and the confutation happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the cyclone and the non-hymenalness occurs is not true if the scandalization does not occur. sent2: that the remonstrating antimycin does not occur and the remonstrating document does not occur is false if the cannulation happens. sent3: that the intercession does not occur and the Cameroonianness does not occur results in the unknowableness. sent4: the prorogation occurs. sent5: the fact that the sportiveness happens hold if that the cyclone and the non-hymenalness happens is not true. sent6: if the sportiveness happens the cannulation occurs. sent7: the scandalization does not occur if the fact that that the scandalization occurs and the introduction does not occur is true is wrong. sent8: that the Cameroonianness does not occur is true. sent9: the prorogation and the confutation occurs. sent10: the fact that the prorogation does not occur is not wrong if that the remonstrating antimycin does not occur and the remonstrating document does not occur is not right. sent11: the intercession does not occur and the Cameroonian does not occur. sent12: the semanticness occurs and the argenticness occurs. sent13: if the spitter happens then that the scandalization but not the introduction occurs is wrong. sent14: the syllogizing tippler does not occur if the backlash does not occur but the syllogizing pentacle occurs. sent15: if the prorogation does not occur that the knowableness does not occur and the confutation occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent11 -> int1: the knowableness does not occur.; sent9 -> int2: the confutation occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__