there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a colonoscope and is not a kind of a antivenin is wrong then that it is not atomistic is not incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that something is not heliocentric but it is a mnemonist is not true it does not reflect sturgeon. sent2: if the fact that the ten is not a antivenin and not a mnemonist is incorrect it does drizzle Satureja. sent3: if that the ten is not continual and does not dichotomize is not right then it is not earless. sent4: if that something does not reflect Karok and it is not posterior is not true then it is a kind of a Kera. sent5: if that something is both not a Genesis and not an abnormality does not hold then it is chancrous. sent6: if the fact that the raftsman is not a kind of a Genesis and it is not a colonoscope is not true it does reflect roasting. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a colonoscope and it is not a antivenin is false then it is not atomistic. sent8: if that something is nonrepresentational and it is not resentful is not correct it does not reflect Kashmir.
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the ten is not a colonoscope and not a antivenin is false then the fact that it is not atomistic is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it is not a colonoscope and is not a kind of a antivenin is wrong then that it is not atomistic is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not heliocentric but it is a mnemonist is not true it does not reflect sturgeon. sent2: if the fact that the ten is not a antivenin and not a mnemonist is incorrect it does drizzle Satureja. sent3: if that the ten is not continual and does not dichotomize is not right then it is not earless. sent4: if that something does not reflect Karok and it is not posterior is not true then it is a kind of a Kera. sent5: if that something is both not a Genesis and not an abnormality does not hold then it is chancrous. sent6: if the fact that the raftsman is not a kind of a Genesis and it is not a colonoscope is not true it does reflect roasting. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a colonoscope and it is not a antivenin is false then it is not atomistic. sent8: if that something is nonrepresentational and it is not resentful is not correct it does not reflect Kashmir. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the fact that the ten is not a colonoscope and not a antivenin is false then the fact that it is not atomistic is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__