the monster is a kind of a mile that is not an old.
sent1: if the gin is a Colombo the lizardfish is a Mongol. sent2: something is both a formalization and tasteful if it is not pyrogenic. sent3: if something is not tasteful that it is not a Colombo and it is unsurmountable is wrong. sent4: the lizardfish does not page Zephyr if the fact that that it is not a formalization but pyrogenic hold does not hold. sent5: the gin is not a kind of a defect. sent6: the gin is not a kind of a Colombo if the endocrine is a kind of a defect. sent7: the gin is a kind of a formalization that is not pyrogenic. sent8: the fact that something is not a formalization but it is pyrogenic is wrong if it is not tasteful. sent9: if the silva does overrefine loving then the monster is a mile but not old. sent10: that the endocrine is a kind of a mile and it is tasteful is incorrect if something is a formalization. sent11: if the gin does overrefine loving then it is unsurmountable. sent12: if that the endocrine is not a Mongol and not a defect is not right the fact that the gin is not a Colombo hold. sent13: the gin is a kind of theist thing that overrefines loving. sent14: that the gin is not a kind of a Colombo and it does not overrefine loving is not right. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is a unfitness or it is non-laryngeal or both is not right. sent16: something pages Zephyr or does defect or both if it is not a kind of a anxiolytic. sent17: the silva does overrefine loving if the hog is unsurmountable. sent18: the lizardfish is not tasteful if there is something such that that it is a unfitness and/or is not laryngeal is not right. sent19: everything is not a kind of a anxiolytic. sent20: if the endocrine defects then the lizardfish does page Zephyr. sent21: the fact that the endocrine is a kind of non-Mongol thing that is not a defect is not right if the lizardfish does not page Zephyr. sent22: the fact that the monster is not pyrogenic is not wrong if something that pages Zephyr is a Mongol.
sent15 & sent18 -> int1: the lizardfish is not tasteful.; sent8 -> int2: that the lizardfish is not a formalization but it is pyrogenic is not true if it is not tasteful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the lizardfish is not a formalization and is pyrogenic is incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the lizardfish does not page Zephyr.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the fact that the endocrine is not a Mongol and is not a defect is not correct.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the gin is not a Colombo.;
the fact that the monster is a mile but it is not an old is false.
sent7 -> int7: that the gin is a kind of a formalization is true.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is a formalization.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: that the endocrine is a mile and it is tasteful does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that that it is a mile and it is tasteful does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the monster is a kind of a mile that is not an old. ; $context$ = sent1: if the gin is a Colombo the lizardfish is a Mongol. sent2: something is both a formalization and tasteful if it is not pyrogenic. sent3: if something is not tasteful that it is not a Colombo and it is unsurmountable is wrong. sent4: the lizardfish does not page Zephyr if the fact that that it is not a formalization but pyrogenic hold does not hold. sent5: the gin is not a kind of a defect. sent6: the gin is not a kind of a Colombo if the endocrine is a kind of a defect. sent7: the gin is a kind of a formalization that is not pyrogenic. sent8: the fact that something is not a formalization but it is pyrogenic is wrong if it is not tasteful. sent9: if the silva does overrefine loving then the monster is a mile but not old. sent10: that the endocrine is a kind of a mile and it is tasteful is incorrect if something is a formalization. sent11: if the gin does overrefine loving then it is unsurmountable. sent12: if that the endocrine is not a Mongol and not a defect is not right the fact that the gin is not a Colombo hold. sent13: the gin is a kind of theist thing that overrefines loving. sent14: that the gin is not a kind of a Colombo and it does not overrefine loving is not right. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is a unfitness or it is non-laryngeal or both is not right. sent16: something pages Zephyr or does defect or both if it is not a kind of a anxiolytic. sent17: the silva does overrefine loving if the hog is unsurmountable. sent18: the lizardfish is not tasteful if there is something such that that it is a unfitness and/or is not laryngeal is not right. sent19: everything is not a kind of a anxiolytic. sent20: if the endocrine defects then the lizardfish does page Zephyr. sent21: the fact that the endocrine is a kind of non-Mongol thing that is not a defect is not right if the lizardfish does not page Zephyr. sent22: the fact that the monster is not pyrogenic is not wrong if something that pages Zephyr is a Mongol. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent18 -> int1: the lizardfish is not tasteful.; sent8 -> int2: that the lizardfish is not a formalization but it is pyrogenic is not true if it is not tasteful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the lizardfish is not a formalization and is pyrogenic is incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the lizardfish does not page Zephyr.; int4 & sent21 -> int5: the fact that the endocrine is not a Mongol and is not a defect is not correct.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the gin is not a Colombo.; __UNKNOWN__