that the Virgo is not unsanitary and/or it is a hee-haw is not true.
sent1: the fact that something is not unsanitary and/or it is a hee-haw is not correct if it does not garner ulalgia. sent2: if the fact that the hunter is both not a cyclamen and nonjudgmental is incorrect the Virgo is sanitary. sent3: if the proprionamide does not garner ulalgia it is not a ways and pitches proprionamide. sent4: the fact that the hunter is not a cyclamen and is nonjudgmental does not hold if the chaff is not ready. sent5: The fact that the ulalgia does not garner proprionamide hold. sent6: something is a cyclamen and it is a kind of a ready if it is not nonjudgmental. sent7: the fact that the proprionamide does not garner ulalgia hold. sent8: that the hunter is a cyclamen and nonjudgmental is not correct. sent9: the chaff is not perceptual if the hunter is not a suited. sent10: if something is a ready then the fact that it does not garner ulalgia and pitches proprionamide is false. sent11: the hemoglobin does not pitch proprionamide if there is something such that the fact that it does not garner ulalgia and it does pitch proprionamide does not hold. sent12: the chaff is not ready if the proprionamide is not a ways and pitches proprionamide. sent13: the fact that the Virgo does not pitch proprionamide is not incorrect if it does not hee-haw. sent14: the hunter is not a suited. sent15: that something is not a cyclamen and is not a ready is wrong if it is nonjudgmental.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the proprionamide is not a kind of a ways and does pitch proprionamide.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the chaff is not a kind of a ready.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the hunter is not a cyclamen but it is nonjudgmental does not hold.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the Virgo is sanitary.; int4 -> hypothesis;
that the Virgo is sanitary or it is a hee-haw or both is not correct.
sent1 -> int5: if the Virgo does not garner ulalgia then the fact that either it is sanitary or it is a hee-haw or both is not right.; sent15 -> int6: that the proprionamide is not a kind of a cyclamen and it is not ready is false if it is nonjudgmental.; sent9 & sent14 -> int7: the chaff is not perceptual.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not perceptual.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Virgo is not unsanitary and/or it is a hee-haw is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is not unsanitary and/or it is a hee-haw is not correct if it does not garner ulalgia. sent2: if the fact that the hunter is both not a cyclamen and nonjudgmental is incorrect the Virgo is sanitary. sent3: if the proprionamide does not garner ulalgia it is not a ways and pitches proprionamide. sent4: the fact that the hunter is not a cyclamen and is nonjudgmental does not hold if the chaff is not ready. sent5: The fact that the ulalgia does not garner proprionamide hold. sent6: something is a cyclamen and it is a kind of a ready if it is not nonjudgmental. sent7: the fact that the proprionamide does not garner ulalgia hold. sent8: that the hunter is a cyclamen and nonjudgmental is not correct. sent9: the chaff is not perceptual if the hunter is not a suited. sent10: if something is a ready then the fact that it does not garner ulalgia and pitches proprionamide is false. sent11: the hemoglobin does not pitch proprionamide if there is something such that the fact that it does not garner ulalgia and it does pitch proprionamide does not hold. sent12: the chaff is not ready if the proprionamide is not a ways and pitches proprionamide. sent13: the fact that the Virgo does not pitch proprionamide is not incorrect if it does not hee-haw. sent14: the hunter is not a suited. sent15: that something is not a cyclamen and is not a ready is wrong if it is nonjudgmental. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the proprionamide is not a kind of a ways and does pitch proprionamide.; sent12 & int1 -> int2: the chaff is not a kind of a ready.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that the hunter is not a cyclamen but it is nonjudgmental does not hold.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the Virgo is sanitary.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__