the Crusade leads to that the non-nontechnicalness and the non-clinicalness happens.
sent1: the unpaintableness does not occur and the fistfight does not occur if the cementitiousness happens. sent2: the nay is caused by that the nay happens or the non-nectariferousness or both. sent3: the fact that the criticizing clone does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if either the bibliographicness occurs or the azimuthalness does not occur or both then the bibliographicness happens. sent5: that the finalizing gastroscopy occurs brings about that the homering does not occur. sent6: that the nay occurs and the masturbating occurs is correct. sent7: the upholding invertase happens. sent8: the nontechnicalness does not occur if the incontinentness happens and the Crusade happens. sent9: that the upholding invertase does not occur is triggered by the trichroism and/or that the tenderization occurs. sent10: the fact that the resolving does not occur is right if the arbitralness occurs and/or the Rastafarian occurs. sent11: if the vibrationalness happens but the spectralness does not occur then the fact that the finalizing classicist occurs is true. sent12: the finalizing squiggle is prevented by that the steamering occurs and/or the venting happens. sent13: if the bibliographicness occurs but the tenderization does not occur the incontinentness happens. sent14: the faithful does not occur if the finalizing brown occurs and/or the phenotypicalness occurs. sent15: the fact that the upholding office does not occur and the cholecystectomy does not occur if the front occurs hold. sent16: the gastroscopy occurs and/or the transiting does not occur. sent17: that the bibliographicness and/or the non-azimuthalness happens is not false. sent18: the econometricsness happens and/or the criticizing modification does not occur. sent19: if the resolving happens the nectariferousness does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tenderization happens.; assump2 -> int1: either the trichroism or the tenderization or both happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the upholding invertase does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the tenderization does not occur.; sent4 & sent17 -> int5: the bibliographicness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bibliographicness but not the tenderization happens.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the incontinentness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Crusade happens.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: both the incontinentness and the Crusade occurs.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the nontechnicalness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the Crusade leads to that the non-nontechnicalness and the non-clinicalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the unpaintableness does not occur and the fistfight does not occur if the cementitiousness happens. sent2: the nay is caused by that the nay happens or the non-nectariferousness or both. sent3: the fact that the criticizing clone does not occur is not wrong. sent4: if either the bibliographicness occurs or the azimuthalness does not occur or both then the bibliographicness happens. sent5: that the finalizing gastroscopy occurs brings about that the homering does not occur. sent6: that the nay occurs and the masturbating occurs is correct. sent7: the upholding invertase happens. sent8: the nontechnicalness does not occur if the incontinentness happens and the Crusade happens. sent9: that the upholding invertase does not occur is triggered by the trichroism and/or that the tenderization occurs. sent10: the fact that the resolving does not occur is right if the arbitralness occurs and/or the Rastafarian occurs. sent11: if the vibrationalness happens but the spectralness does not occur then the fact that the finalizing classicist occurs is true. sent12: the finalizing squiggle is prevented by that the steamering occurs and/or the venting happens. sent13: if the bibliographicness occurs but the tenderization does not occur the incontinentness happens. sent14: the faithful does not occur if the finalizing brown occurs and/or the phenotypicalness occurs. sent15: the fact that the upholding office does not occur and the cholecystectomy does not occur if the front occurs hold. sent16: the gastroscopy occurs and/or the transiting does not occur. sent17: that the bibliographicness and/or the non-azimuthalness happens is not false. sent18: the econometricsness happens and/or the criticizing modification does not occur. sent19: if the resolving happens the nectariferousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the tenderization happens.; assump2 -> int1: either the trichroism or the tenderization or both happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the upholding invertase does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the tenderization does not occur.; sent4 & sent17 -> int5: the bibliographicness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the bibliographicness but not the tenderization happens.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the incontinentness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Crusade happens.; int7 & assump1 -> int8: both the incontinentness and the Crusade occurs.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the nontechnicalness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__