the covalentness does not occur.
sent1: the passableness does not occur. sent2: if the castigation happens then the soaking occurs. sent3: the covalentness but not the seedlessness happens if the disposal does not occur. sent4: the noticing occurs. sent5: if that the pigmenting ballpark does not occur is not incorrect that the entozoicness and the disposal occurs is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the hemolyticness does not occur but the chyliferousness happens is incorrect. sent7: that the pigmenting ballpark does not occur is brought about by that the keylessness and the diet occurs. sent8: if that not the hemolyticness but the chyliferousness happens does not hold then the fact that the chyliferousness does not occur hold. sent9: the ascertaining malacologist and the keylessness occurs if the chyliferousness does not occur. sent10: the tangibleness happens. sent11: the seedlessness does not occur. sent12: the ornamentation happens. sent13: that the seedyness and the disposal happens is triggered by that the pigmenting ballpark does not occur. sent14: that if that the entozoicness and the disposal occurs is not true then the disposal does not occur is not false. sent15: if the covalentness occurs then the seedlessness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the covalentness occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that the seedlessness occurs is right.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
the covalentness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the covalentness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the passableness does not occur. sent2: if the castigation happens then the soaking occurs. sent3: the covalentness but not the seedlessness happens if the disposal does not occur. sent4: the noticing occurs. sent5: if that the pigmenting ballpark does not occur is not incorrect that the entozoicness and the disposal occurs is incorrect. sent6: the fact that the hemolyticness does not occur but the chyliferousness happens is incorrect. sent7: that the pigmenting ballpark does not occur is brought about by that the keylessness and the diet occurs. sent8: if that not the hemolyticness but the chyliferousness happens does not hold then the fact that the chyliferousness does not occur hold. sent9: the ascertaining malacologist and the keylessness occurs if the chyliferousness does not occur. sent10: the tangibleness happens. sent11: the seedlessness does not occur. sent12: the ornamentation happens. sent13: that the seedyness and the disposal happens is triggered by that the pigmenting ballpark does not occur. sent14: that if that the entozoicness and the disposal occurs is not true then the disposal does not occur is not false. sent15: if the covalentness occurs then the seedlessness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the covalentness occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that the seedlessness occurs is right.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__