that if the flagon is an employee the molester is not unintrusive and is not Ionic is not right.
sent1: the molester does rubbish countercurrent. sent2: if the flagon is an acolyte and an employee the feedstock is not an inevitable. sent3: the feedstock does not luxuriate TNF. sent4: the molester does not block. sent5: the flagon is not a Kickapoo. sent6: the molester is not Ionic if the feedstock is both inevitable and an employee. sent7: the molester is a kind of an acolyte that is not a block. sent8: the flagon is an employee and intrusive. sent9: the molester is a kind of an inevitable that is not a kind of a block if the fact that the feedstock is intrusive is not false. sent10: the molester is intrusive but it is not a kind of a block if the feedstock is not an inevitable. sent11: something is Ionic but it is not intrusive. sent12: the witloof is not an acolyte. sent13: if something luxuriates TNF and it is a derailment then that the flagon is an acolyte is true. sent14: if the fact that the feedstock is an employee is not false then the molester is Ionic and is not an inevitable. sent15: the fact that the feedstock is a block but not Ionic is right if the molester is an inevitable. sent16: the molester is an employee and is not a block. sent17: something is not a derailment. sent18: the dioon is an employee. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a Plethodon the molester is non-Ionic. sent20: the flagon is an acolyte if something does luxuriate TNF but it is not a derailment. sent21: there is something such that it luxuriates TNF and is not a kind of a derailment. sent22: if the feedstock is not an inevitable the molester is not a block. sent23: there is something such that it is a Plethodon. sent24: the flagon is both an employee and not an inevitable.
sent21 & sent20 -> int1: the flagon is a kind of an acolyte.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flagon is a kind of an employee.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flagon is an acolyte and is an employee.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the feedstock is not inevitable.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the molester is intrusive but it is not a kind of a block.; int4 -> int5: that the molester is intrusive is right.; sent23 & sent19 -> int6: the molester is not Ionic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the molester is intrusive but it is not Ionic.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the flagon is an employee the molester is not unintrusive and is not Ionic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the molester does rubbish countercurrent. sent2: if the flagon is an acolyte and an employee the feedstock is not an inevitable. sent3: the feedstock does not luxuriate TNF. sent4: the molester does not block. sent5: the flagon is not a Kickapoo. sent6: the molester is not Ionic if the feedstock is both inevitable and an employee. sent7: the molester is a kind of an acolyte that is not a block. sent8: the flagon is an employee and intrusive. sent9: the molester is a kind of an inevitable that is not a kind of a block if the fact that the feedstock is intrusive is not false. sent10: the molester is intrusive but it is not a kind of a block if the feedstock is not an inevitable. sent11: something is Ionic but it is not intrusive. sent12: the witloof is not an acolyte. sent13: if something luxuriates TNF and it is a derailment then that the flagon is an acolyte is true. sent14: if the fact that the feedstock is an employee is not false then the molester is Ionic and is not an inevitable. sent15: the fact that the feedstock is a block but not Ionic is right if the molester is an inevitable. sent16: the molester is an employee and is not a block. sent17: something is not a derailment. sent18: the dioon is an employee. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a Plethodon the molester is non-Ionic. sent20: the flagon is an acolyte if something does luxuriate TNF but it is not a derailment. sent21: there is something such that it luxuriates TNF and is not a kind of a derailment. sent22: if the feedstock is not an inevitable the molester is not a block. sent23: there is something such that it is a Plethodon. sent24: the flagon is both an employee and not an inevitable. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent20 -> int1: the flagon is a kind of an acolyte.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flagon is a kind of an employee.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the flagon is an acolyte and is an employee.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the feedstock is not inevitable.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the molester is intrusive but it is not a kind of a block.; int4 -> int5: that the molester is intrusive is right.; sent23 & sent19 -> int6: the molester is not Ionic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the molester is intrusive but it is not Ionic.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__