there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a psychedelia and it does not network pre-empt is not right then it is not a kind of a unusualness.
sent1: if the fact that the firewood does sediment lackey but it is not a unusualness is not right it does not network Volgograd. sent2: the copywriter does not sediment megalopolis if that it is seaworthy and it is not a metric does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a psychedelia and it does not network pre-empt is incorrect it is a kind of a unusualness. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a psychedelia and does not network pre-empt then the fact that it is not a unusualness is true. sent5: there exists something such that if that it sediments megalopolis and it is not a kind of a roomette is wrong it does not network Devanagari. sent6: there exists something such that if it does network pre-empt then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent7: if that the firewood is a psychedelia but it does not network pre-empt is not correct that it is a unusualness is not wrong. sent8: if the firewood is a kind of a psychedelia but it does not network pre-empt then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent9: if that the firewood is a kind of antipyretic thing that does not network pre-empt is false then it is not rectal. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is arenicolous and it is not a Polk is not correct it is not presocratic. sent11: if the fact that the firewood is a kind of a psychedelia that does not network pre-empt is wrong it is not a unusualness. sent12: if that the firewood is a psychedelia and it networks pre-empt does not hold then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a psychedelia it is not a unusualness. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is a psychedelia and networks pre-empt does not hold then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent15: if the firewood is not a psychedelia it is not a kind of a unusualness.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a psychedelia and it does not network pre-empt is not right then it is not a kind of a unusualness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the firewood does sediment lackey but it is not a unusualness is not right it does not network Volgograd. sent2: the copywriter does not sediment megalopolis if that it is seaworthy and it is not a metric does not hold. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a psychedelia and it does not network pre-empt is incorrect it is a kind of a unusualness. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a psychedelia and does not network pre-empt then the fact that it is not a unusualness is true. sent5: there exists something such that if that it sediments megalopolis and it is not a kind of a roomette is wrong it does not network Devanagari. sent6: there exists something such that if it does network pre-empt then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent7: if that the firewood is a psychedelia but it does not network pre-empt is not correct that it is a unusualness is not wrong. sent8: if the firewood is a kind of a psychedelia but it does not network pre-empt then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent9: if that the firewood is a kind of antipyretic thing that does not network pre-empt is false then it is not rectal. sent10: there exists something such that if the fact that it is arenicolous and it is not a Polk is not correct it is not presocratic. sent11: if the fact that the firewood is a kind of a psychedelia that does not network pre-empt is wrong it is not a unusualness. sent12: if that the firewood is a psychedelia and it networks pre-empt does not hold then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent13: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a psychedelia it is not a unusualness. sent14: there exists something such that if that it is a psychedelia and networks pre-empt does not hold then it is not a kind of a unusualness. sent15: if the firewood is not a psychedelia it is not a kind of a unusualness. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__