not the pilgrimage but the consolidation happens.
sent1: the court-martial occurs and the conventionalizing Paraguay does not occur if the fearing ha-ha occurs. sent2: if the overshoot does not occur then the practice occurs and the consolidation occurs. sent3: the pilgrimage does not occur if the physicochemicalness occurs but the docking does not occur. sent4: the court-martialing is prevented by that the conflict happens and the steeling footstool happens. sent5: the overshooting does not occur. sent6: the physicochemicalness occurs and the docking does not occur if the steeling footstool does not occur. sent7: if the conflicting does not occur that not the pilgrimage but the consolidation happens is not right. sent8: the conflicting occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steeling footstool occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the conflicting happens and the steeling footstool happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the court-martial does not occur.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the practice and the consolidation happens.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the consolidation happens is correct.;
that the pilgrimage does not occur but the consolidation happens is not true.
$hypothesis$ = not the pilgrimage but the consolidation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the court-martial occurs and the conventionalizing Paraguay does not occur if the fearing ha-ha occurs. sent2: if the overshoot does not occur then the practice occurs and the consolidation occurs. sent3: the pilgrimage does not occur if the physicochemicalness occurs but the docking does not occur. sent4: the court-martialing is prevented by that the conflict happens and the steeling footstool happens. sent5: the overshooting does not occur. sent6: the physicochemicalness occurs and the docking does not occur if the steeling footstool does not occur. sent7: if the conflicting does not occur that not the pilgrimage but the consolidation happens is not right. sent8: the conflicting occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steeling footstool occurs.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the conflicting happens and the steeling footstool happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the court-martial does not occur.; sent2 & sent5 -> int3: the practice and the consolidation happens.; int3 -> int4: the fact that the consolidation happens is correct.; __UNKNOWN__