the shoot-down occurs and the urticating flute does not occur.
sent1: both the smudge and the duster occurs if the evenness does not occur. sent2: if the Timorese does not occur then the alliaceousness occurs. sent3: the desexualizing playback does not occur. sent4: not the unlikableness but the urticating disagreeableness occurs. sent5: if that the nonintellectualness occurs and/or the pothering does not occur is not right the androgeneticness does not occur. sent6: the electronicsness occurs. sent7: the ticktock does not occur. sent8: the desexualizing AUC but not the mounding Strand occurs. sent9: the evening happens if that the caduceanness does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the urticating flute does not occur if the fact that either the smudge occurs or the evenness does not occur or both is not right. sent11: the urticating neckline does not occur if the fact that the departmentalness does not occur and the ram happens is not correct. sent12: the diligence does not occur. sent13: the freeze occurs. sent14: if the smudge happens that the shoot-down but not the urticating flute happens does not hold. sent15: if that the uninformativeness happens or the Incanness does not occur or both does not hold then the lateness does not occur. sent16: that the percussing does not occur hold. sent17: that the duster happens is prevented by the non-electronicsness. sent18: the urticating flute does not occur if the fact that the fact that either the smudge or the evening or both happens is not right is true. sent19: the evening occurs. sent20: if that not the caduceanness but the electronicsness happens is incorrect then the fact that the duster does not occur is true. sent21: if the smudge does not occur then that either the mounding waterloo happens or the absolution does not occur or both is not correct. sent22: the shoot-down occurs and the freeze occurs. sent23: the fact that that the endocrine and/or the non-alikeness happens hold is not correct. sent24: the duster occurs if the desexualizing playback does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that both the non-caduceanness and the electronicsness occurs is correct is not true.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the duster does not occur.; sent24 & sent3 -> int2: the duster happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-caduceanness and the electronicsness happens.; int4 -> int5: the caduceanness does not occur.; sent22 -> int6: the shoot-down happens.;
that the mounding waterloo occurs and/or the absolution does not occur is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the shoot-down occurs and the urticating flute does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: both the smudge and the duster occurs if the evenness does not occur. sent2: if the Timorese does not occur then the alliaceousness occurs. sent3: the desexualizing playback does not occur. sent4: not the unlikableness but the urticating disagreeableness occurs. sent5: if that the nonintellectualness occurs and/or the pothering does not occur is not right the androgeneticness does not occur. sent6: the electronicsness occurs. sent7: the ticktock does not occur. sent8: the desexualizing AUC but not the mounding Strand occurs. sent9: the evening happens if that the caduceanness does not occur is not wrong. sent10: the urticating flute does not occur if the fact that either the smudge occurs or the evenness does not occur or both is not right. sent11: the urticating neckline does not occur if the fact that the departmentalness does not occur and the ram happens is not correct. sent12: the diligence does not occur. sent13: the freeze occurs. sent14: if the smudge happens that the shoot-down but not the urticating flute happens does not hold. sent15: if that the uninformativeness happens or the Incanness does not occur or both does not hold then the lateness does not occur. sent16: that the percussing does not occur hold. sent17: that the duster happens is prevented by the non-electronicsness. sent18: the urticating flute does not occur if the fact that the fact that either the smudge or the evening or both happens is not right is true. sent19: the evening occurs. sent20: if that not the caduceanness but the electronicsness happens is incorrect then the fact that the duster does not occur is true. sent21: if the smudge does not occur then that either the mounding waterloo happens or the absolution does not occur or both is not correct. sent22: the shoot-down occurs and the freeze occurs. sent23: the fact that that the endocrine and/or the non-alikeness happens hold is not correct. sent24: the duster occurs if the desexualizing playback does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that both the non-caduceanness and the electronicsness occurs is correct is not true.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the duster does not occur.; sent24 & sent3 -> int2: the duster happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-caduceanness and the electronicsness happens.; int4 -> int5: the caduceanness does not occur.; sent22 -> int6: the shoot-down happens.; __UNKNOWN__