if the walkout occurs the mobilization happens.
sent1: if the beholding profanation does not occur then the peregrination does not occur. sent2: the negotiating Formosan happens. sent3: if the adjudicativeness does not occur then the negotiating lifeboat does not occur. sent4: if the laugh does not occur the filarialness occurs. sent5: that the healthcare occurs and the walkout occurs prevents that the beholding pinhole happens. sent6: the Japaneseness does not occur. sent7: the ecotourism does not occur. sent8: the reporting millivolt does not occur. sent9: the believing scarab does not occur. sent10: the peregrination does not occur. sent11: the adjudicativeness does not occur if the healthcare does not occur. sent12: the unsentness happens. sent13: if the walkout does not occur the adjudicativeness occurs and the negotiating lifeboat happens. sent14: the bribery does not occur if the singlesness does not occur. sent15: the bribery occurs if the vrooming does not occur. sent16: that the peregrination does not occur but the negotiating lifeboat happens is triggered by that the beholding profanation does not occur. sent17: the beholding profanation does not occur. sent18: if the fact that the peregrination does not occur but the beholding profanation occurs is wrong then the mobilization does not occur. sent19: the inoperableness happens. sent20: the beholding sloe does not occur. sent21: both the Tantricness and the gastrectomy occurs. sent22: the mobilization happens if the beholding pinhole does not occur. sent23: the bicycling occurs. sent24: both the coo and the perennial happens. sent25: the dispersing does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the healthcare does not occur.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the adjudicativeness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the negotiating lifeboat does not occur.; sent16 & sent17 -> int3: the peregrination does not occur and the negotiating lifeboat happens.; int3 -> int4: the negotiating lifeboat occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the healthcare happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the walkout occurs.; int6 & assump1 -> int7: both the healthcare and the walkout occurs.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the beholding pinhole does not occur.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the mobilization occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the naturisticness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the walkout occurs the mobilization happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the beholding profanation does not occur then the peregrination does not occur. sent2: the negotiating Formosan happens. sent3: if the adjudicativeness does not occur then the negotiating lifeboat does not occur. sent4: if the laugh does not occur the filarialness occurs. sent5: that the healthcare occurs and the walkout occurs prevents that the beholding pinhole happens. sent6: the Japaneseness does not occur. sent7: the ecotourism does not occur. sent8: the reporting millivolt does not occur. sent9: the believing scarab does not occur. sent10: the peregrination does not occur. sent11: the adjudicativeness does not occur if the healthcare does not occur. sent12: the unsentness happens. sent13: if the walkout does not occur the adjudicativeness occurs and the negotiating lifeboat happens. sent14: the bribery does not occur if the singlesness does not occur. sent15: the bribery occurs if the vrooming does not occur. sent16: that the peregrination does not occur but the negotiating lifeboat happens is triggered by that the beholding profanation does not occur. sent17: the beholding profanation does not occur. sent18: if the fact that the peregrination does not occur but the beholding profanation occurs is wrong then the mobilization does not occur. sent19: the inoperableness happens. sent20: the beholding sloe does not occur. sent21: both the Tantricness and the gastrectomy occurs. sent22: the mobilization happens if the beholding pinhole does not occur. sent23: the bicycling occurs. sent24: both the coo and the perennial happens. sent25: the dispersing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the healthcare does not occur.; sent11 & assump2 -> int1: the adjudicativeness does not occur.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the negotiating lifeboat does not occur.; sent16 & sent17 -> int3: the peregrination does not occur and the negotiating lifeboat happens.; int3 -> int4: the negotiating lifeboat occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the healthcare happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the walkout occurs.; int6 & assump1 -> int7: both the healthcare and the walkout occurs.; int7 & sent5 -> int8: the beholding pinhole does not occur.; int8 & sent22 -> int9: the mobilization occurs.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__