that not the reloading but the femoralness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the non-syncategorematicness is prevented by that the moksa does not occur but the conic occurs. sent2: if both the raying and the epiphyticness occurs then the syncategorematicness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the reloading does not occur but the femoralness occurs is incorrect if the passing Kilimanjaro does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: that the moksa does not occur but the conic happens is triggered by the passing Kilimanjaro.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the passing Kilimanjaro happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the moksa does not occur but the conic occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the syncategorematicness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = that not the reloading but the femoralness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-syncategorematicness is prevented by that the moksa does not occur but the conic occurs. sent2: if both the raying and the epiphyticness occurs then the syncategorematicness does not occur. sent3: that the fact that the reloading does not occur but the femoralness occurs is incorrect if the passing Kilimanjaro does not occur is not incorrect. sent4: that the moksa does not occur but the conic happens is triggered by the passing Kilimanjaro. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the passing Kilimanjaro happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the moksa does not occur but the conic occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the syncategorematicness happens.; __UNKNOWN__