the broadbandness happens.
sent1: both the imperativeness and the consubstantiating occurs if the damaging does not occur. sent2: if that both the misbehaving and the monumentalness happens is false the costiveness does not occur. sent3: the installation occurs and the guaranteeing zinfandel occurs. sent4: the recalculation does not occur. sent5: if that the armillariness occurs and the abasicness happens is not right the imperativeness does not occur. sent6: that both the armillariness and the abasicness occurs does not hold if the broadbandness does not occur. sent7: that the damaging occurs yields that the consubstantiating but not the imperativeness happens. sent8: if the fastening does not occur that the permeation happens but the cluing does not occur is incorrect. sent9: the broadbandness does not occur if the consubstantiating occurs and the imperative does not occur. sent10: if that both the anthropicness and the diligentness happens is wrong then the fronting does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the fastening and the buildup occurs does not hold then the fastening does not occur. sent12: that the haring does not occur is true if the improvisation occurs. sent13: the fact that the processing Breuer happens and the Leibnizianness occurs is wrong. sent14: the damaging does not occur. sent15: if the whack does not occur then the fact that the depluming and the transition happens does not hold. sent16: that the baffling and the dissenting flatware occurs is not correct if the roundhouse does not occur. sent17: the roundhouse does not occur if the fact that the permeation occurs but the cluing does not occur is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the softness does not occur is correct both the damaging and the resorting happens. sent19: the softness does not occur if the fact that the baffling happens and the dissenting flatware occurs is incorrect. sent20: if the hare does not occur the fact that the fastening and the buildup occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadbandness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the armillariness happens and the abasicness happens is wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the imperative does not occur.; sent1 & sent14 -> int3: the imperative and the consubstantiating happens.; int3 -> int4: the imperativeness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the broadbandness does not occur is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the broadbandness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the imperativeness and the consubstantiating occurs if the damaging does not occur. sent2: if that both the misbehaving and the monumentalness happens is false the costiveness does not occur. sent3: the installation occurs and the guaranteeing zinfandel occurs. sent4: the recalculation does not occur. sent5: if that the armillariness occurs and the abasicness happens is not right the imperativeness does not occur. sent6: that both the armillariness and the abasicness occurs does not hold if the broadbandness does not occur. sent7: that the damaging occurs yields that the consubstantiating but not the imperativeness happens. sent8: if the fastening does not occur that the permeation happens but the cluing does not occur is incorrect. sent9: the broadbandness does not occur if the consubstantiating occurs and the imperative does not occur. sent10: if that both the anthropicness and the diligentness happens is wrong then the fronting does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the fastening and the buildup occurs does not hold then the fastening does not occur. sent12: that the haring does not occur is true if the improvisation occurs. sent13: the fact that the processing Breuer happens and the Leibnizianness occurs is wrong. sent14: the damaging does not occur. sent15: if the whack does not occur then the fact that the depluming and the transition happens does not hold. sent16: that the baffling and the dissenting flatware occurs is not correct if the roundhouse does not occur. sent17: the roundhouse does not occur if the fact that the permeation occurs but the cluing does not occur is incorrect. sent18: if the fact that the softness does not occur is correct both the damaging and the resorting happens. sent19: the softness does not occur if the fact that the baffling happens and the dissenting flatware occurs is incorrect. sent20: if the hare does not occur the fact that the fastening and the buildup occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the broadbandness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the armillariness happens and the abasicness happens is wrong.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the imperative does not occur.; sent1 & sent14 -> int3: the imperative and the consubstantiating happens.; int3 -> int4: the imperativeness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__