there exists something such that if that it is not conclusive and not a dazzled is not right then it is not ontogenetic.
sent1: if the fact that something does not crumble and it does not stroke Avignon does not hold it is not a kind of a Enki. sent2: the silks is ontogenetic if the fact that it is not conclusive and it does not dazzle does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Alnico it does not pattern promptness. sent4: something is not amalgamative if the fact that it is not a Hebe and is not a kind of a balancer is not right. sent5: the sima is not romaic if it is a dazzled. sent6: if that the fact that the silks is not conclusive and it is not a kind of a dazzled does not hold is true then it is not ontogenetic.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if that it is both not a Hebe and not a balancer does not hold it is not amalgamative.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the financier is not amalgamative hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a Hebe and is not a balancer is wrong.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not conclusive and not a dazzled is not right then it is not ontogenetic. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does not crumble and it does not stroke Avignon does not hold it is not a kind of a Enki. sent2: the silks is ontogenetic if the fact that it is not conclusive and it does not dazzle does not hold. sent3: there is something such that if it is a Alnico it does not pattern promptness. sent4: something is not amalgamative if the fact that it is not a Hebe and is not a kind of a balancer is not right. sent5: the sima is not romaic if it is a dazzled. sent6: if that the fact that the silks is not conclusive and it is not a kind of a dazzled does not hold is true then it is not ontogenetic. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__