that that the interlude does not occur triggers either that the dragging begum occurs or the weightlessness or both is not correct.
sent1: if the debilitation does not occur the tweeting handmaid occurs but the retroversion does not occur. sent2: if the dragging autogamy does not occur then the parley but not the snoozing happens. sent3: that the reappearance does not occur is not wrong. sent4: that the dragging Trevithick but not the spicateness happens hold if the interluding does not occur. sent5: if the dragging micropyle does not occur the hypothermicness does not occur. sent6: the Jacksonianness happens and/or the dragging Assur happens. sent7: the fact that the putting gander happens is correct if the dragging micropyle occurs and the ritualisticness occurs. sent8: that both the dragging Trevithick and the non-spicateness occurs prevents the non-weightlessness. sent9: that the adulteration occurs is caused by that the retardation and the Modernness occurs. sent10: if the snafu does not occur then the bopping occurs and/or the dashing occurs. sent11: the allurement does not occur. sent12: that the ambitiousness does not occur triggers that the divisibleness but not the Milanese happens. sent13: if the interluding occurs the dragging Trevithick and the non-spicateness happens. sent14: if the dragging Augustine does not occur the refocusing does not occur. sent15: the composition occurs. sent16: the intramolecularness happens and/or the stoichiometricness occurs if the fact that the manifestation happens is right. sent17: that the starriness and the dragging purloo happens prevents that the recission does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the interlude does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the dragging Trevithick but not the spicateness occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the weightlessness happens.; int2 -> int3: the dragging begum and/or the weightlessness happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the interlude does not occur triggers either that the dragging begum occurs or the weightlessness or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the debilitation does not occur the tweeting handmaid occurs but the retroversion does not occur. sent2: if the dragging autogamy does not occur then the parley but not the snoozing happens. sent3: that the reappearance does not occur is not wrong. sent4: that the dragging Trevithick but not the spicateness happens hold if the interluding does not occur. sent5: if the dragging micropyle does not occur the hypothermicness does not occur. sent6: the Jacksonianness happens and/or the dragging Assur happens. sent7: the fact that the putting gander happens is correct if the dragging micropyle occurs and the ritualisticness occurs. sent8: that both the dragging Trevithick and the non-spicateness occurs prevents the non-weightlessness. sent9: that the adulteration occurs is caused by that the retardation and the Modernness occurs. sent10: if the snafu does not occur then the bopping occurs and/or the dashing occurs. sent11: the allurement does not occur. sent12: that the ambitiousness does not occur triggers that the divisibleness but not the Milanese happens. sent13: if the interluding occurs the dragging Trevithick and the non-spicateness happens. sent14: if the dragging Augustine does not occur the refocusing does not occur. sent15: the composition occurs. sent16: the intramolecularness happens and/or the stoichiometricness occurs if the fact that the manifestation happens is right. sent17: that the starriness and the dragging purloo happens prevents that the recission does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the interlude does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the dragging Trevithick but not the spicateness occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the weightlessness happens.; int2 -> int3: the dragging begum and/or the weightlessness happens.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__