the fact that not the Yumanness but the antibacterialness occurs is wrong.
sent1: the neoclassicist is brought about by that the pavage does not occur. sent2: if the fact that not the Yumanness but the antibacterial happens is incorrect then the neoclassicistness does not occur. sent3: that the neoclassicistness does not occur and the commercializing bride-gift does not occur is brought about by that the snowball happens. sent4: if the sideswipe occurs then the hydrostaticsness happens and the zonalness does not occur. sent5: that the spiritualization does not occur and the Buddhist does not occur prevents that the talking occurs. sent6: that the de-escalation does not occur and the zymoticness does not occur is brought about by that the angiospermousness occurs. sent7: if the jerking does not occur the spiritualization does not occur and the Buddhistness does not occur. sent8: both the perambulating and the snowball happens if the de-escalation does not occur. sent9: that the sleepwalking does not occur and/or the non-maxillariness results in that the jerking does not occur. sent10: that the talk does not occur yields that both the non-dioeciousness and the sideswiping happens. sent11: if the commercializing bride-gift does not occur the fact that the neoclassicistness happens is right. sent12: the pavage does not occur and/or the commercializing bride-gift does not occur. sent13: the sleepwalking does not occur and/or the maxillariness does not occur. sent14: that the angiospermousness happens and the bathing papaw happens is caused by the non-biauricularness. sent15: if the Yuman happens the neoclassicistness does not occur. sent16: that not the Yumanness but the antibacterial occurs is false if the pavage happens. sent17: either that the acclimatizing occurs or that the Neanderthalness occurs or both is triggered by the non-zonalness. sent18: the pavage happens if the neoclassicist does not occur and the commercializing bride-gift does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that not the Yuman but the antibacterial happens is false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the neoclassicistness does not occur.; sent12 & sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the neoclassicistness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that both the non-Yumanness and the antibacterial occurs does not hold.
sent9 & sent13 -> int4: the jerk does not occur.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: that the spiritualization does not occur and the Buddhistness does not occur hold.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: the talk does not occur.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the dioeciousness does not occur and the sideswiping happens.; int7 -> int8: the sideswipe happens.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: both the hydrostaticsness and the non-zonalness occurs.; int9 -> int10: the zonalness does not occur.; sent17 & int10 -> int11: the acclimatizing or the Neanderthalness or both happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that not the Yumanness but the antibacterialness occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the neoclassicist is brought about by that the pavage does not occur. sent2: if the fact that not the Yumanness but the antibacterial happens is incorrect then the neoclassicistness does not occur. sent3: that the neoclassicistness does not occur and the commercializing bride-gift does not occur is brought about by that the snowball happens. sent4: if the sideswipe occurs then the hydrostaticsness happens and the zonalness does not occur. sent5: that the spiritualization does not occur and the Buddhist does not occur prevents that the talking occurs. sent6: that the de-escalation does not occur and the zymoticness does not occur is brought about by that the angiospermousness occurs. sent7: if the jerking does not occur the spiritualization does not occur and the Buddhistness does not occur. sent8: both the perambulating and the snowball happens if the de-escalation does not occur. sent9: that the sleepwalking does not occur and/or the non-maxillariness results in that the jerking does not occur. sent10: that the talk does not occur yields that both the non-dioeciousness and the sideswiping happens. sent11: if the commercializing bride-gift does not occur the fact that the neoclassicistness happens is right. sent12: the pavage does not occur and/or the commercializing bride-gift does not occur. sent13: the sleepwalking does not occur and/or the maxillariness does not occur. sent14: that the angiospermousness happens and the bathing papaw happens is caused by the non-biauricularness. sent15: if the Yuman happens the neoclassicistness does not occur. sent16: that not the Yumanness but the antibacterial occurs is false if the pavage happens. sent17: either that the acclimatizing occurs or that the Neanderthalness occurs or both is triggered by the non-zonalness. sent18: the pavage happens if the neoclassicist does not occur and the commercializing bride-gift does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that not the Yuman but the antibacterial happens is false.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the neoclassicistness does not occur.; sent12 & sent1 & sent11 -> int2: the neoclassicistness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__