the idolater is opportune.
sent1: the idolater is opportune if it does not stratify mephobarbital and does not hype actinometry. sent2: the leper is not a Bakelite if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a massicot or is not non-narrow or both is false. sent3: if something is inopportune thing that is not a kind of a Bakelite then it is a kind of a perspective. sent4: the idolater is a weigher. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a narrowed and it does not insert proration. sent6: if something is a kind of a narrow then it does hype actinometry. sent7: if the napkin narrows that either it is not a massicot or it is a narrow or both does not hold. sent8: something is inopportune thing that is not a kind of a Bakelite if it hypes actinometry. sent9: something stratifies mephobarbital and is not a perspective if it is not a Bakelite. sent10: the jersey is not a Bakelite. sent11: the idolater does not stratify mephobarbital and it does not hype actinometry if the jersey does stratify mephobarbital. sent12: that the calcium does hype actinometry is right if there is something such that it either is a massicot or does hype actinometry or both. sent13: the girder is opportune if it is a Pisum and it does not hype Musial.
sent9 -> int1: the jersey stratifies mephobarbital but it is not a perspective if it is not a kind of a Bakelite.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the jersey stratifies mephobarbital and is not a perspective.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the jersey stratifies mephobarbital is not wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the idolater does not stratify mephobarbital and it does not hype actinometry.; int4 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the calcium is a perspective is correct.
sent3 -> int5: if the calcium is not opportune and not a Bakelite it is a kind of a perspective.; sent8 -> int6: the calcium is both not opportune and not a Bakelite if it does hype actinometry.; sent6 -> int7: if the idolater is a narrow then it hypes actinometry.;
$hypothesis$ = the idolater is opportune. ; $context$ = sent1: the idolater is opportune if it does not stratify mephobarbital and does not hype actinometry. sent2: the leper is not a Bakelite if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a massicot or is not non-narrow or both is false. sent3: if something is inopportune thing that is not a kind of a Bakelite then it is a kind of a perspective. sent4: the idolater is a weigher. sent5: there exists something such that it is not a narrowed and it does not insert proration. sent6: if something is a kind of a narrow then it does hype actinometry. sent7: if the napkin narrows that either it is not a massicot or it is a narrow or both does not hold. sent8: something is inopportune thing that is not a kind of a Bakelite if it hypes actinometry. sent9: something stratifies mephobarbital and is not a perspective if it is not a Bakelite. sent10: the jersey is not a Bakelite. sent11: the idolater does not stratify mephobarbital and it does not hype actinometry if the jersey does stratify mephobarbital. sent12: that the calcium does hype actinometry is right if there is something such that it either is a massicot or does hype actinometry or both. sent13: the girder is opportune if it is a Pisum and it does not hype Musial. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the jersey stratifies mephobarbital but it is not a perspective if it is not a kind of a Bakelite.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the jersey stratifies mephobarbital and is not a perspective.; int2 -> int3: the fact that the jersey stratifies mephobarbital is not wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the idolater does not stratify mephobarbital and it does not hype actinometry.; int4 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__