the sportswriter eulogizes quinsy.
sent1: the fact that the sportswriter does not suffocate and is not a kind of a snapline is incorrect. sent2: the chinaware is a machmeter. sent3: that the sportswriter is non-transdermal thing that is not a garnishment does not hold. sent4: something does eulogize quinsy if it is a machmeter. sent5: something remainders Dinesen if the fact that it is not noncombinative and not generative is not true. sent6: the globetrotter does eulogize quinsy. sent7: the leukocyte is a snapline. sent8: something is a hawk if that it is non-rehabilitative thing that does not render resonator is not true. sent9: there exists nothing that is both not a machmeter and not a snapline. sent10: something does eulogize quinsy if the fact that that it is both not a machmeter and not a snapline is true is not right. sent11: there exists nothing that does not render chinaware and is not a dribble. sent12: something is a Piaf if the fact that it does not stifle globetrotter and is not a Watergate is wrong. sent13: the fact that the sportswriter is a kind of a machmeter that is not a snapline is not right. sent14: something is a kind of a garnishment if that it is not a mihrab and it is not a kind of a reformed is false. sent15: that the sportswriter is non-chylific thing that does not render gemma is not true. sent16: the sportswriter eulogizes quinsy if it is a machmeter. sent17: if the fact that that something does not render leukocyte and is not an information is right does not hold then it is rehabilitative. sent18: if that something does not dribble and is not a oenomel is incorrect it is not non-calculous. sent19: the sportswriter is a machmeter if the fact that it is not ripe and it is not a reformed is not right. sent20: the sportswriter is a Mercer if that it is not mammalian and it does not eulogize stag is not right. sent21: there exists nothing such that it is a machmeter and it is not a snapline.
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that the sportswriter is not a machmeter and it is not a snapline is wrong then the fact that it does eulogize quinsy hold.; sent9 -> int2: that that the sportswriter is not a machmeter and it is not a snapline is not true is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the sportswriter is a garnishment hold if that it is not a kind of a mihrab and it is not a kind of a reformed is wrong.
sent14 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sportswriter eulogizes quinsy. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sportswriter does not suffocate and is not a kind of a snapline is incorrect. sent2: the chinaware is a machmeter. sent3: that the sportswriter is non-transdermal thing that is not a garnishment does not hold. sent4: something does eulogize quinsy if it is a machmeter. sent5: something remainders Dinesen if the fact that it is not noncombinative and not generative is not true. sent6: the globetrotter does eulogize quinsy. sent7: the leukocyte is a snapline. sent8: something is a hawk if that it is non-rehabilitative thing that does not render resonator is not true. sent9: there exists nothing that is both not a machmeter and not a snapline. sent10: something does eulogize quinsy if the fact that that it is both not a machmeter and not a snapline is true is not right. sent11: there exists nothing that does not render chinaware and is not a dribble. sent12: something is a Piaf if the fact that it does not stifle globetrotter and is not a Watergate is wrong. sent13: the fact that the sportswriter is a kind of a machmeter that is not a snapline is not right. sent14: something is a kind of a garnishment if that it is not a mihrab and it is not a kind of a reformed is false. sent15: that the sportswriter is non-chylific thing that does not render gemma is not true. sent16: the sportswriter eulogizes quinsy if it is a machmeter. sent17: if the fact that that something does not render leukocyte and is not an information is right does not hold then it is rehabilitative. sent18: if that something does not dribble and is not a oenomel is incorrect it is not non-calculous. sent19: the sportswriter is a machmeter if the fact that it is not ripe and it is not a reformed is not right. sent20: the sportswriter is a Mercer if that it is not mammalian and it does not eulogize stag is not right. sent21: there exists nothing such that it is a machmeter and it is not a snapline. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the fact that the sportswriter is not a machmeter and it is not a snapline is wrong then the fact that it does eulogize quinsy hold.; sent9 -> int2: that that the sportswriter is not a machmeter and it is not a snapline is not true is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__