the foxglove is a Leptoptilus.
sent1: something is both a sarcosome and not lymphatic. sent2: that the pancake is a sourpuss but it is not a sarcosome does not hold. sent3: something is a regard if that it is a typhus is not incorrect. sent4: that something is not a kind of a hire and does murmur dingo is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a Leptoptilus is correct. sent5: the sabertooth does murmur dingo if something is lymphatic. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is lymphatic and not a Leptoptilus is not true the foxglove does murmur dingo. sent7: the sabertooth does not murmur dingo. sent8: if something does not murmur dingo it is not a Leptoptilus. sent9: the foxglove is a Leptoptilus if it is a sarcosome. sent10: The dingo does not murmur sabertooth. sent11: the fact that the sabertooth is a Leptoptilus is not false if there is something such that it is both not a typhus and a regard. sent12: that the foxglove is a sarcosome and is not non-lymphatic is not correct. sent13: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a sarcosome and it is lymphatic is wrong. sent14: the foxglove is not lymphatic. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is both a plaza and not a parenthetical does not hold. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does murmur dingo and is not lymphatic is not correct then the sabertooth is a kind of a sarcosome. sent17: the sabertooth does murmur dingo if there is something such that that it is both a sarcosome and not lymphatic does not hold. sent18: something is not a typhus but it regards if it is not a kind of a parenthetical.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the foxglove is a sarcosome but it is not lymphatic does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a sarcosome but not lymphatic does not hold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the sabertooth does murmur dingo.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the foxglove is a sarcosome and is non-lymphatic.; int4 -> int5: the foxglove is a kind of a sarcosome.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the arcella hires hold.
sent4 -> int6: if the sabertooth is a kind of a Leptoptilus that it is not a hire and does murmur dingo does not hold.; sent18 -> int7: that the saltation is both not a typhus and a regard is true if it is not a parenthetical.;
$hypothesis$ = the foxglove is a Leptoptilus. ; $context$ = sent1: something is both a sarcosome and not lymphatic. sent2: that the pancake is a sourpuss but it is not a sarcosome does not hold. sent3: something is a regard if that it is a typhus is not incorrect. sent4: that something is not a kind of a hire and does murmur dingo is incorrect if the fact that it is a kind of a Leptoptilus is correct. sent5: the sabertooth does murmur dingo if something is lymphatic. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is lymphatic and not a Leptoptilus is not true the foxglove does murmur dingo. sent7: the sabertooth does not murmur dingo. sent8: if something does not murmur dingo it is not a Leptoptilus. sent9: the foxglove is a Leptoptilus if it is a sarcosome. sent10: The dingo does not murmur sabertooth. sent11: the fact that the sabertooth is a Leptoptilus is not false if there is something such that it is both not a typhus and a regard. sent12: that the foxglove is a sarcosome and is not non-lymphatic is not correct. sent13: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a sarcosome and it is lymphatic is wrong. sent14: the foxglove is not lymphatic. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is both a plaza and not a parenthetical does not hold. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it does murmur dingo and is not lymphatic is not correct then the sabertooth is a kind of a sarcosome. sent17: the sabertooth does murmur dingo if there is something such that that it is both a sarcosome and not lymphatic does not hold. sent18: something is not a typhus but it regards if it is not a kind of a parenthetical. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the foxglove is a sarcosome but it is not lymphatic does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is a sarcosome but not lymphatic does not hold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the sabertooth does murmur dingo.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the foxglove is a sarcosome and is non-lymphatic.; int4 -> int5: the foxglove is a kind of a sarcosome.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__