the success is a dearth.
sent1: the newsstand squawks Brownshirt. sent2: the success is a kind of a dearth if there exists something such that the fact that it does squawk Brownshirt and it is not a punctilio is not right. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a punctilio. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a thatch and it is not a kind of a punctilio is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the professional squawks Brownshirt and is a kind of a punctilio is false. sent6: the Oglala is not a oxazepam if the fact that the Brownshirt is not a robe and is a luau is wrong. sent7: if the Oglala is not a oxazepam but a thatch the newsstand is not a thatch. sent8: the Oglala is not a kind of a gamebag if the fact that it does not treat Quaoar and is not hydroelectric is wrong. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a thatch and it is a dearth is incorrect if it is not a racon. sent10: there is something such that it does squawk Brownshirt. sent11: the newsstand is a thatch if something squawks Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio. sent12: the professional is not a punctilio. sent13: the Oglala is not a oxazepam and it is not a thatch. sent14: there exists something such that it is a oxazepam that is not a punctilio. sent15: the newsstand does not thatch if the Oglala is not a oxazepam and it is not a thatch. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it squawks Brownshirt and is a punctilio is not correct. sent17: there is something such that that it does squawk Brownshirt and it is not a dearth is false. sent18: that the Oglala is not a thatch is not wrong. sent19: the fact that the newsstand covets creator is not incorrect. sent20: that the newsstand is a oxazepam hold if the Oglala is not a oxazepam and not a gamebag. sent21: if something that covets creator is a oxazepam then it is not a racon.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the professional squawks Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio.; assump1 -> int1: something does squawk Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the newsstand is a thatch.; sent15 & sent13 -> int3: the newsstand is not a thatch.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the professional squawks Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio is false.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it squawks Brownshirt and is not a punctilio is wrong.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the success is not a dearth.
sent9 -> int7: the fact that the fact that the newsstand is a kind of a thatch and it is a dearth does not hold is not false if it is not a racon.; sent21 -> int8: if the newsstand does covet creator and it is a oxazepam it is not a racon.;
$hypothesis$ = the success is a dearth. ; $context$ = sent1: the newsstand squawks Brownshirt. sent2: the success is a kind of a dearth if there exists something such that the fact that it does squawk Brownshirt and it is not a punctilio is not right. sent3: there exists something such that it is not a punctilio. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is a thatch and it is not a kind of a punctilio is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the professional squawks Brownshirt and is a kind of a punctilio is false. sent6: the Oglala is not a oxazepam if the fact that the Brownshirt is not a robe and is a luau is wrong. sent7: if the Oglala is not a oxazepam but a thatch the newsstand is not a thatch. sent8: the Oglala is not a kind of a gamebag if the fact that it does not treat Quaoar and is not hydroelectric is wrong. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a thatch and it is a dearth is incorrect if it is not a racon. sent10: there is something such that it does squawk Brownshirt. sent11: the newsstand is a thatch if something squawks Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio. sent12: the professional is not a punctilio. sent13: the Oglala is not a oxazepam and it is not a thatch. sent14: there exists something such that it is a oxazepam that is not a punctilio. sent15: the newsstand does not thatch if the Oglala is not a oxazepam and it is not a thatch. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it squawks Brownshirt and is a punctilio is not correct. sent17: there is something such that that it does squawk Brownshirt and it is not a dearth is false. sent18: that the Oglala is not a thatch is not wrong. sent19: the fact that the newsstand covets creator is not incorrect. sent20: that the newsstand is a oxazepam hold if the Oglala is not a oxazepam and not a gamebag. sent21: if something that covets creator is a oxazepam then it is not a racon. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the professional squawks Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio.; assump1 -> int1: something does squawk Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the newsstand is a thatch.; sent15 & sent13 -> int3: the newsstand is not a thatch.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the professional squawks Brownshirt but it is not a punctilio is false.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it squawks Brownshirt and is not a punctilio is wrong.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__