there is something such that it is not thoughtless.
sent1: something is a dado if it is orchestral. sent2: something is proper if it is a Aesculus. sent3: if something is a naprapath and it is a Hardy it is not clinical. sent4: the materialist does not lather resolution and/or is mathematical if it is not clinical. sent5: the fact that the anklebone is mathematical hold. sent6: if the wheelwork is not a signboard and/or it is not bimorphemic then it does not denaturalize impenetrability. sent7: if the marshal is over-the-counter then the anklebone is a Aesculus. sent8: if the materialist is over-the-counter then it is mathematical and it is not clinical. sent9: if the anklebone is proper then the materialist does denaturalize impenetrability. sent10: something is a lemma if it is not non-Iraqi. sent11: something is thoughtless. sent12: that something is not thoughtless is not false if either it does not lather resolution or it is non-mathematical or both. sent13: if the materialist denaturalizes impenetrability then it is a naprapath that is not a Hardy. sent14: if the materialist is a kind of a naprapath and it is a Hardy then it is not clinical. sent15: the marshal is over-the-counter. sent16: the perihelion is mathematical. sent17: either the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not mathematical or both if that it is clinical does not hold. sent18: if something that is a naprapath is not a Hardy then it is not clinical. sent19: either the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not non-mathematical or both. sent20: the materialist lathers resolution or is not mathematical or both. sent21: the materialist does lather resolution and/or is not mathematical if it is not clinical. sent22: the materialist is not a kind of a Hardy if that it does denaturalize impenetrability is true. sent23: that the materialist is not a Hardy is right. sent24: if something is a scholar then it is a kind of a Iraqi.
sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the anklebone is a Aesculus.; sent2 -> int2: if the anklebone is a kind of a Aesculus it is proper.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the anklebone is proper.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the materialist denaturalizes impenetrability.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the materialist is a kind of a naprapath but it is not a Hardy.; sent18 -> int6: if the materialist is a naprapath that is not a Hardy then it is not clinical.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the materialist is not clinical.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: either the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not mathematical or both.; sent12 -> int9: if the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not mathematical or both then it is not thoughtless.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the materialist is not thoughtless.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is not thoughtless. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a dado if it is orchestral. sent2: something is proper if it is a Aesculus. sent3: if something is a naprapath and it is a Hardy it is not clinical. sent4: the materialist does not lather resolution and/or is mathematical if it is not clinical. sent5: the fact that the anklebone is mathematical hold. sent6: if the wheelwork is not a signboard and/or it is not bimorphemic then it does not denaturalize impenetrability. sent7: if the marshal is over-the-counter then the anklebone is a Aesculus. sent8: if the materialist is over-the-counter then it is mathematical and it is not clinical. sent9: if the anklebone is proper then the materialist does denaturalize impenetrability. sent10: something is a lemma if it is not non-Iraqi. sent11: something is thoughtless. sent12: that something is not thoughtless is not false if either it does not lather resolution or it is non-mathematical or both. sent13: if the materialist denaturalizes impenetrability then it is a naprapath that is not a Hardy. sent14: if the materialist is a kind of a naprapath and it is a Hardy then it is not clinical. sent15: the marshal is over-the-counter. sent16: the perihelion is mathematical. sent17: either the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not mathematical or both if that it is clinical does not hold. sent18: if something that is a naprapath is not a Hardy then it is not clinical. sent19: either the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not non-mathematical or both. sent20: the materialist lathers resolution or is not mathematical or both. sent21: the materialist does lather resolution and/or is not mathematical if it is not clinical. sent22: the materialist is not a kind of a Hardy if that it does denaturalize impenetrability is true. sent23: that the materialist is not a Hardy is right. sent24: if something is a scholar then it is a kind of a Iraqi. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the anklebone is a Aesculus.; sent2 -> int2: if the anklebone is a kind of a Aesculus it is proper.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the anklebone is proper.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the materialist denaturalizes impenetrability.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the materialist is a kind of a naprapath but it is not a Hardy.; sent18 -> int6: if the materialist is a naprapath that is not a Hardy then it is not clinical.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the materialist is not clinical.; int7 & sent17 -> int8: either the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not mathematical or both.; sent12 -> int9: if the materialist does not lather resolution or it is not mathematical or both then it is not thoughtless.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the materialist is not thoughtless.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__