that the brucine insufflates legume and is not professorial is not correct.
sent1: the microbat is nonlinguistic and/or it drills moleskin if the slip-on does not drills moleskin. sent2: if the brucine does not reheat cocktail then the fact that the slip-on is professorial and it insufflates legume does not hold. sent3: if the slip-on does reheat cocktail and it is a shoetree it does not drill moleskin. sent4: that the coccus does not insufflate nonaccomplishment hold. sent5: the slip-on is a kind of a shoetree. sent6: if the fact that the slip-on does not reheat cocktail is correct then that the brucine insufflates legume and is not professorial is false. sent7: there is something such that it does insufflate nonaccomplishment. sent8: That the nonaccomplishment does not insufflate coccus hold. sent9: the brucine is not professorial if the slip-on is professorial. sent10: that the brucine insufflates legume and it is professorial does not hold. sent11: the coccus does insufflate nonaccomplishment if the microbat does drill moleskin.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slip-on reheats cocktail.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the slip-on reheats cocktail and it is a shoetree.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the slip-on does not drill moleskin.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the microbat is nonlinguistic and/or it does drill moleskin.;
the brucine insufflates legume but it is not professorial.
$hypothesis$ = that the brucine insufflates legume and is not professorial is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the microbat is nonlinguistic and/or it drills moleskin if the slip-on does not drills moleskin. sent2: if the brucine does not reheat cocktail then the fact that the slip-on is professorial and it insufflates legume does not hold. sent3: if the slip-on does reheat cocktail and it is a shoetree it does not drill moleskin. sent4: that the coccus does not insufflate nonaccomplishment hold. sent5: the slip-on is a kind of a shoetree. sent6: if the fact that the slip-on does not reheat cocktail is correct then that the brucine insufflates legume and is not professorial is false. sent7: there is something such that it does insufflate nonaccomplishment. sent8: That the nonaccomplishment does not insufflate coccus hold. sent9: the brucine is not professorial if the slip-on is professorial. sent10: that the brucine insufflates legume and it is professorial does not hold. sent11: the coccus does insufflate nonaccomplishment if the microbat does drill moleskin. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the slip-on reheats cocktail.; assump1 & sent5 -> int1: the slip-on reheats cocktail and it is a shoetree.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the slip-on does not drill moleskin.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the microbat is nonlinguistic and/or it does drill moleskin.; __UNKNOWN__