the fact that the shadow does not occur and the capillarity does not occur is incorrect.
sent1: if the agriculture and the splaying sack occurs then the antitypicness does not occur. sent2: if not the variolarness but the antitypicness happens then the shadowing does not occur. sent3: the variolarness leads to that the antitypicness happens. sent4: if the sunburst does not occur then the fact that the shadowing does not occur and the capillarity does not occur is wrong. sent5: that the shadow does not occur but the capillarity occurs is incorrect. sent6: that the cesareanness occurs prevents the non-variolarness. sent7: the orthopedicness does not occur. sent8: the splaying nadolol occurs. sent9: the cocooning happens. sent10: the fact that the shadow but not the capillarity happens is false if the sunburst does not occur. sent11: the cesareanness happens if the completing occurs. sent12: the adjusting happens. sent13: that the shadowing occurs but the capillarity does not occur is not right. sent14: if the aggrieving does not occur that not the bending but the participialness happens does not hold. sent15: the fact that the swapping does not occur and the inspection occurs is not true if the completing does not occur. sent16: the spraying Aframomum occurs. sent17: the recombining happens and the agriculture occurs. sent18: both the splaying sack and the cocooning occurs. sent19: the fact that the swapping happens and the inspection happens does not hold if the completedness does not occur. sent20: the recombining happens. sent21: the fact that not the shadow but the capillarity occurs is wrong if the sunburst does not occur. sent22: that the sunburst occurs is prevented by that the swapping happens. sent23: the fact that the fact that the swapping and the inspection occurs is not incorrect is not correct. sent24: if that not the swapping but the inspection happens is false the sunburst does not occur. sent25: the distraction happens if the duplicity happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the completing occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the cesareanness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the variolarness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the antitypicness occurs.; sent17 -> int4: the agriculture occurs.; sent18 -> int5: the splaying sack occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the agriculture and the splaying sack happens.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the antitypicness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the completing does not occur.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: that not the swapping but the inspection happens does not hold.; int10 & sent24 -> int11: that the sunburst occurs is not correct.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the shadowing does not occur and the capillarity does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the shadow does not occur and the capillarity does not occur is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the agriculture and the splaying sack occurs then the antitypicness does not occur. sent2: if not the variolarness but the antitypicness happens then the shadowing does not occur. sent3: the variolarness leads to that the antitypicness happens. sent4: if the sunburst does not occur then the fact that the shadowing does not occur and the capillarity does not occur is wrong. sent5: that the shadow does not occur but the capillarity occurs is incorrect. sent6: that the cesareanness occurs prevents the non-variolarness. sent7: the orthopedicness does not occur. sent8: the splaying nadolol occurs. sent9: the cocooning happens. sent10: the fact that the shadow but not the capillarity happens is false if the sunburst does not occur. sent11: the cesareanness happens if the completing occurs. sent12: the adjusting happens. sent13: that the shadowing occurs but the capillarity does not occur is not right. sent14: if the aggrieving does not occur that not the bending but the participialness happens does not hold. sent15: the fact that the swapping does not occur and the inspection occurs is not true if the completing does not occur. sent16: the spraying Aframomum occurs. sent17: the recombining happens and the agriculture occurs. sent18: both the splaying sack and the cocooning occurs. sent19: the fact that the swapping happens and the inspection happens does not hold if the completedness does not occur. sent20: the recombining happens. sent21: the fact that not the shadow but the capillarity occurs is wrong if the sunburst does not occur. sent22: that the sunburst occurs is prevented by that the swapping happens. sent23: the fact that the fact that the swapping and the inspection occurs is not incorrect is not correct. sent24: if that not the swapping but the inspection happens is false the sunburst does not occur. sent25: the distraction happens if the duplicity happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the completing occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the cesareanness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the variolarness happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the antitypicness occurs.; sent17 -> int4: the agriculture occurs.; sent18 -> int5: the splaying sack occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the agriculture and the splaying sack happens.; sent1 & int6 -> int7: the antitypicness does not occur.; int3 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the completing does not occur.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: that not the swapping but the inspection happens does not hold.; int10 & sent24 -> int11: that the sunburst occurs is not correct.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__