that the mocha is chaetal thing that is not areolar is not right.
sent1: that the niobium does not approbate microeconomist is true if that the lanthanum is archidiaconal is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the mocha is chaetal but it does not approbate microeconomist is not right. sent3: the lanthanum is archidiaconal and/or it does not approbate microeconomist. sent4: the niobium is not a bronchodilator if the mocha is a bronchodilator that does not approbate microeconomist. sent5: the fact that the lanthanum is unwelcome thing that does not wrench is false if that the niobium is archidiaconal is not false. sent6: the niobium is unwelcome if something is not a kind of a narrowing or is a bronchodilator or both. sent7: if the niobium is a kind of a wrench then that the mocha is both chaetal and not areolar is not true. sent8: the niobium does not approbate microeconomist if the lanthanum does not approbate microeconomist. sent9: the mocha is unwelcome. sent10: either something is not a kind of a narrowing or it is a bronchodilator or both. sent11: the mocha is unwelcome or not areolar or both. sent12: if that the niobium is areolar is not false then the mocha does not approbate microeconomist. sent13: the niobium is a kind of a wrench if it does not approbate microeconomist and is areolar.
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the niobium is unwelcome.; sent3 & sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the niobium does not approbate microeconomist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the niobium does not approbate microeconomist but it is unwelcome.;
that the niobium is not a bronchodilator is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = that the mocha is chaetal thing that is not areolar is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the niobium does not approbate microeconomist is true if that the lanthanum is archidiaconal is not wrong. sent2: the fact that the mocha is chaetal but it does not approbate microeconomist is not right. sent3: the lanthanum is archidiaconal and/or it does not approbate microeconomist. sent4: the niobium is not a bronchodilator if the mocha is a bronchodilator that does not approbate microeconomist. sent5: the fact that the lanthanum is unwelcome thing that does not wrench is false if that the niobium is archidiaconal is not false. sent6: the niobium is unwelcome if something is not a kind of a narrowing or is a bronchodilator or both. sent7: if the niobium is a kind of a wrench then that the mocha is both chaetal and not areolar is not true. sent8: the niobium does not approbate microeconomist if the lanthanum does not approbate microeconomist. sent9: the mocha is unwelcome. sent10: either something is not a kind of a narrowing or it is a bronchodilator or both. sent11: the mocha is unwelcome or not areolar or both. sent12: if that the niobium is areolar is not false then the mocha does not approbate microeconomist. sent13: the niobium is a kind of a wrench if it does not approbate microeconomist and is areolar. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent6 -> int1: the niobium is unwelcome.; sent3 & sent1 & sent8 -> int2: the niobium does not approbate microeconomist.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the niobium does not approbate microeconomist but it is unwelcome.; __UNKNOWN__