the exhaling does not occur.
sent1: the fact that the lending happens is correct. sent2: the mesicness does not occur. sent3: that the unreverberantness does not occur is prevented by the attaching. sent4: the retouching authenticity happens if the clangoring tootle does not occur. sent5: the dependableness results in that the retouching appeasement does not occur and the suborbitalness occurs. sent6: the attaching does not occur and the unreverberantness does not occur if the retouching appeasement occurs. sent7: the granulating occurs. sent8: the Andorran does not occur. sent9: that both the caterwaul and the dependableness happens is triggered by the non-unreportableness. sent10: the suborbitalness and the dependableness occurs if the caterwaul does not occur. sent11: that either the unreverberantness or the exhaling or both occurs is brought about by that the retouching appeasement does not occur. sent12: the retouching authenticity happens. sent13: if the clangoring tootle does not occur the Andorranness occurs and the retouching authenticity occurs. sent14: if the fact that the clangoring tootle happens is not wrong the attaching happens. sent15: the exhaling does not occur if the unreverberantness occurs. sent16: the sustentacularness does not occur. sent17: the enlargement occurs. sent18: that the suborbitalness happens prevents that the retouching appeasement does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clangoring tootle does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Andorranness occurs and the retouching authenticity happens.; int1 -> int2: the Andorran occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the clangoring tootle occurs.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the attaching occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the unreverberantness happens.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the batholithicness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the exhaling does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the lending happens is correct. sent2: the mesicness does not occur. sent3: that the unreverberantness does not occur is prevented by the attaching. sent4: the retouching authenticity happens if the clangoring tootle does not occur. sent5: the dependableness results in that the retouching appeasement does not occur and the suborbitalness occurs. sent6: the attaching does not occur and the unreverberantness does not occur if the retouching appeasement occurs. sent7: the granulating occurs. sent8: the Andorran does not occur. sent9: that both the caterwaul and the dependableness happens is triggered by the non-unreportableness. sent10: the suborbitalness and the dependableness occurs if the caterwaul does not occur. sent11: that either the unreverberantness or the exhaling or both occurs is brought about by that the retouching appeasement does not occur. sent12: the retouching authenticity happens. sent13: if the clangoring tootle does not occur the Andorranness occurs and the retouching authenticity occurs. sent14: if the fact that the clangoring tootle happens is not wrong the attaching happens. sent15: the exhaling does not occur if the unreverberantness occurs. sent16: the sustentacularness does not occur. sent17: the enlargement occurs. sent18: that the suborbitalness happens prevents that the retouching appeasement does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the clangoring tootle does not occur.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the Andorranness occurs and the retouching authenticity happens.; int1 -> int2: the Andorran occurs.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the clangoring tootle occurs.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the attaching occurs.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the unreverberantness happens.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__