there is something such that if it does not impart neoclassicism then it is not a kind of a Cytisus and it is not violent.
sent1: if the allspice does not impart neoclassicism then it is not a Cytisus. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not etymological it is not an applicant and is not a scraping. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not impart neoclassicism hold then it is not violent. sent4: the allspice is not a Cytisus and is not violent if it does not impart neoclassicism. sent5: if the allspice is not anemometric it is not a kind of a twopence. sent6: there is something such that if it imparts neoclassicism then it is both not a Cytisus and not violent. sent7: if something is not a bight it is not fleshy and does not crucify.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a bight it is not fleshy and does not crucify.
sent7 -> int1: if the wristband is not a kind of a bight it is not fleshy and it does not crucify.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does not impart neoclassicism then it is not a kind of a Cytisus and it is not violent. ; $context$ = sent1: if the allspice does not impart neoclassicism then it is not a Cytisus. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not etymological it is not an applicant and is not a scraping. sent3: there is something such that if the fact that it does not impart neoclassicism hold then it is not violent. sent4: the allspice is not a Cytisus and is not violent if it does not impart neoclassicism. sent5: if the allspice is not anemometric it is not a kind of a twopence. sent6: there is something such that if it imparts neoclassicism then it is both not a Cytisus and not violent. sent7: if something is not a bight it is not fleshy and does not crucify. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__