the wanton does reheat.
sent1: if the glycoprotein geysers somniloquist the wanton does reheat. sent2: if the Apache is not a samosa then it is not a kind of a story and it is not a greenfly. sent3: if that the wanton does not reheat but it does geyser biggin is not true then that that it does not geyser bronco is not incorrect is not correct. sent4: if the swinger is prejudicial the glycoprotein does geyser somniloquist. sent5: if the swinger is not a fakir then the Apache is a kind of a samosa and does reheat. sent6: something that does geyser somniloquist is not non-prejudicial and not a fakir. sent7: the Yahi does not geyser oxidase if it is both not a frilled and allogamous. sent8: the fact that something is a kohl and does not geyser somniloquist is incorrect if it does not geyser bronco. sent9: The biggin geysers Apache. sent10: there exists nothing that is not a story and is not a greenfly. sent11: if the Apache is a kohl it is a kind of a fakir. sent12: the wanton does not reheat if the Apache is a samosa and does reheat. sent13: if the Yahi geysers bronco and does not geyser biggin then the glycoprotein does not geysers bronco. sent14: the swinger is a warhorse. sent15: the fact that something is not a kohl but it does geyser bronco is not right if it does geyser biggin. sent16: the Apache geysers biggin. sent17: if the Yahi does not geyser oxidase then it geysers bronco and it does not geyser biggin. sent18: the swinger is prejudicial if something that is a samosa is a fakir.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Apache is not a samosa.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Apache is both not a story and not a greenfly.; sent10 -> int2: that the Apache is both not a story and not a greenfly does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Apache is a kind of a samosa.; sent15 -> int5: the fact that the Apache is not a kohl and geysers bronco does not hold if it does geyser biggin.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the Apache is not a kohl but it geysers bronco does not hold.;
the wanton does not reheat.
sent6 -> int7: the swinger is prejudicial and not a fakir if that it does geyser somniloquist is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int8: if the glycoprotein does not geyser bronco then that it is a kind of a kohl and it does not geyser somniloquist is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the wanton does reheat. ; $context$ = sent1: if the glycoprotein geysers somniloquist the wanton does reheat. sent2: if the Apache is not a samosa then it is not a kind of a story and it is not a greenfly. sent3: if that the wanton does not reheat but it does geyser biggin is not true then that that it does not geyser bronco is not incorrect is not correct. sent4: if the swinger is prejudicial the glycoprotein does geyser somniloquist. sent5: if the swinger is not a fakir then the Apache is a kind of a samosa and does reheat. sent6: something that does geyser somniloquist is not non-prejudicial and not a fakir. sent7: the Yahi does not geyser oxidase if it is both not a frilled and allogamous. sent8: the fact that something is a kohl and does not geyser somniloquist is incorrect if it does not geyser bronco. sent9: The biggin geysers Apache. sent10: there exists nothing that is not a story and is not a greenfly. sent11: if the Apache is a kohl it is a kind of a fakir. sent12: the wanton does not reheat if the Apache is a samosa and does reheat. sent13: if the Yahi geysers bronco and does not geyser biggin then the glycoprotein does not geysers bronco. sent14: the swinger is a warhorse. sent15: the fact that something is not a kohl but it does geyser bronco is not right if it does geyser biggin. sent16: the Apache geysers biggin. sent17: if the Yahi does not geyser oxidase then it geysers bronco and it does not geyser biggin. sent18: the swinger is prejudicial if something that is a samosa is a fakir. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Apache is not a samosa.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Apache is both not a story and not a greenfly.; sent10 -> int2: that the Apache is both not a story and not a greenfly does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Apache is a kind of a samosa.; sent15 -> int5: the fact that the Apache is not a kohl and geysers bronco does not hold if it does geyser biggin.; int5 & sent16 -> int6: the fact that the Apache is not a kohl but it geysers bronco does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__