the vigilante is not psychogenetic if that the fact that the hatchery is inhospitable and does not scintillate does not hold is not wrong.
sent1: if that the hatchery is inhospitable but it does not scintillate is not correct then it is not backless. sent2: if the fact that the hatchery is inhospitable and it does scintillate is not true the vigilante is not psychogenetic. sent3: the vigilante is not psychogenetic if the hatchery is not a essonite and it does not radio biosphere.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hatchery is not hospitable but it does not scintillate does not hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the hatchery is not backless.;
$hypothesis$ = the vigilante is not psychogenetic if that the fact that the hatchery is inhospitable and does not scintillate does not hold is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the hatchery is inhospitable but it does not scintillate is not correct then it is not backless. sent2: if the fact that the hatchery is inhospitable and it does scintillate is not true the vigilante is not psychogenetic. sent3: the vigilante is not psychogenetic if the hatchery is not a essonite and it does not radio biosphere. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hatchery is not hospitable but it does not scintillate does not hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the hatchery is not backless.; __UNKNOWN__