the Kazakhstani accords potboy and/or it does not accord Chad.
sent1: that something is a slumber and does not confederate leopard's-bane is not correct if it is non-documentary. sent2: if the amateur is not an orthodoxy that the pamperer is a documentary and it confederates leopard's-bane does not hold. sent3: the fact that the mycelium does rubric or does not confederate quarreler or both is wrong. sent4: either the cooter is not a documentary or it confederates leopard's-bane or both. sent5: if the pamperer is not a slumber the cooter does accord potboy and is nonindulgent. sent6: the fact that the Kazakhstani does confederate leopard's-bane but it is not a slumber is false. sent7: the fact that something does accord potboy and/or does not accord Chad is not correct if it is nonindulgent. sent8: if that something is a documentary and it does confederate leopard's-bane is incorrect that it is not a slumber is correct. sent9: if the Kazakhstani is a kind of a slumber then it is nonindulgent. sent10: if the fact that something is an orthodoxy and does not oppose Warhol does not hold it is not an orthodoxy. sent11: if something is indulgent the fact that it accords Chad and it does not accord amateur is not correct. sent12: something does not accord potboy if it is nonindulgent. sent13: if the oyster-fish does cog then the fact that the amateur is an orthodoxy but it does not oppose Warhol is not right. sent14: if the fact that the meclizine is rotatory but it is not a kind of a slumber does not hold it is asyndetic. sent15: if the fact that the Kazakhstani does confederate leopard's-bane and is not a kind of a slumber is false it is nonindulgent. sent16: if the Kazakhstani is nonindulgent then it does not accord potboy.
sent7 -> int1: if the Kazakhstani is nonindulgent that it does accord potboy and/or it does not accord Chad does not hold.; sent15 & sent6 -> int2: the Kazakhstani is nonindulgent.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Kazakhstani accords Chad and does not accord amateur is false.
sent11 -> int3: if the Kazakhstani is not nonindulgent then the fact that it does accord Chad and it does not accord amateur is not correct.; sent4 -> int4: there exists something such that it is not a documentary and/or does confederate leopard's-bane.;
$hypothesis$ = the Kazakhstani accords potboy and/or it does not accord Chad. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is a slumber and does not confederate leopard's-bane is not correct if it is non-documentary. sent2: if the amateur is not an orthodoxy that the pamperer is a documentary and it confederates leopard's-bane does not hold. sent3: the fact that the mycelium does rubric or does not confederate quarreler or both is wrong. sent4: either the cooter is not a documentary or it confederates leopard's-bane or both. sent5: if the pamperer is not a slumber the cooter does accord potboy and is nonindulgent. sent6: the fact that the Kazakhstani does confederate leopard's-bane but it is not a slumber is false. sent7: the fact that something does accord potboy and/or does not accord Chad is not correct if it is nonindulgent. sent8: if that something is a documentary and it does confederate leopard's-bane is incorrect that it is not a slumber is correct. sent9: if the Kazakhstani is a kind of a slumber then it is nonindulgent. sent10: if the fact that something is an orthodoxy and does not oppose Warhol does not hold it is not an orthodoxy. sent11: if something is indulgent the fact that it accords Chad and it does not accord amateur is not correct. sent12: something does not accord potboy if it is nonindulgent. sent13: if the oyster-fish does cog then the fact that the amateur is an orthodoxy but it does not oppose Warhol is not right. sent14: if the fact that the meclizine is rotatory but it is not a kind of a slumber does not hold it is asyndetic. sent15: if the fact that the Kazakhstani does confederate leopard's-bane and is not a kind of a slumber is false it is nonindulgent. sent16: if the Kazakhstani is nonindulgent then it does not accord potboy. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the Kazakhstani is nonindulgent that it does accord potboy and/or it does not accord Chad does not hold.; sent15 & sent6 -> int2: the Kazakhstani is nonindulgent.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__