the fact that the atmosphere coughs and it is seraphic does not hold.
sent1: if something that is not a sickbay is not azotic that the witch-hunter is nonphotosynthetic is right. sent2: the hart's-tongue is not sociological if something is negligent and a fulcrum. sent3: something is not a sickbay and it is not azotic. sent4: the fact that the atmosphere is a cough that is seraphic is false if the hart's-tongue is not sociological. sent5: if the buzzer does not level Cenozoic then the fact that the maisonette either does fence or is not a retreatant or both is not true. sent6: the fact that the maisonette is a kind of a retreatant hold. sent7: if the witch-hunter is nonphotosynthetic then the robin is evaporative. sent8: the robin is negligent if that that the maisonette is a fence and/or not a retreatant is wrong is right. sent9: the buzzer does not level Cenozoic. sent10: if something is evaporative it is a fulcrum. sent11: the fact that something levels Cenozoic and it does confer is not right if it is not nonphotosynthetic. sent12: The Cenozoic does not level buzzer.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the witch-hunter is nonphotosynthetic.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the robin is evaporative.; sent10 -> int3: if the robin is evaporative it is a fulcrum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the robin is a fulcrum.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that either the maisonette is a fence or it is not a retreatant or both is false.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the robin is not non-negligent.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the robin is negligent and it is a fulcrum.; int7 -> int8: something is negligent a fulcrum.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the hart's-tongue is not sociological.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the libration levels Cenozoic and confers does not hold.
sent11 -> int10: the fact that that the libration does level Cenozoic and it does confer hold is not correct if it is not nonphotosynthetic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the atmosphere coughs and it is seraphic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a sickbay is not azotic that the witch-hunter is nonphotosynthetic is right. sent2: the hart's-tongue is not sociological if something is negligent and a fulcrum. sent3: something is not a sickbay and it is not azotic. sent4: the fact that the atmosphere is a cough that is seraphic is false if the hart's-tongue is not sociological. sent5: if the buzzer does not level Cenozoic then the fact that the maisonette either does fence or is not a retreatant or both is not true. sent6: the fact that the maisonette is a kind of a retreatant hold. sent7: if the witch-hunter is nonphotosynthetic then the robin is evaporative. sent8: the robin is negligent if that that the maisonette is a fence and/or not a retreatant is wrong is right. sent9: the buzzer does not level Cenozoic. sent10: if something is evaporative it is a fulcrum. sent11: the fact that something levels Cenozoic and it does confer is not right if it is not nonphotosynthetic. sent12: The Cenozoic does not level buzzer. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the witch-hunter is nonphotosynthetic.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the robin is evaporative.; sent10 -> int3: if the robin is evaporative it is a fulcrum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the robin is a fulcrum.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that either the maisonette is a fence or it is not a retreatant or both is false.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the robin is not non-negligent.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the robin is negligent and it is a fulcrum.; int7 -> int8: something is negligent a fulcrum.; int8 & sent2 -> int9: the hart's-tongue is not sociological.; int9 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__