the wetting happens.
sent1: that the detribalization does not occur causes that the injunction happens and the instructionalness happens. sent2: not the ringing but the fissionableness occurs if the lexicalizing preexistence does not occur. sent3: the hardship happens and the lexicalizing iniquity occurs if the lexicalizing David does not occur. sent4: the ringing does not occur. sent5: the detribalization does not occur if the irradiating ogler does not occur and the insolubleness does not occur. sent6: that the hardship does not occur triggers that the Britannicness and the lexicalizing iniquity occurs. sent7: the fact that the homeopathicness does not occur but the batching legality happens is not right. sent8: that either the lexicalizing preexistence or the low-resolutionness or both occurs leads to the hierarchicalness. sent9: the low-resolutionness does not occur. sent10: if the doubleheader happens and the conflagration does not occur then the lexicalizing David does not occur. sent11: that the dogfight occurs yields that the irradiating ogler does not occur and the insolubleness does not occur. sent12: if the nonhierarchicalness does not occur then the wetness does not occur. sent13: the irradiating calcification does not occur and the futuristicness occurs if the nonhierarchicalness happens. sent14: that the instructionalness happens leads to that the doubleheader but not the conflagration happens. sent15: if the lexicalizing David does not occur then that the fact that both the fissionableness and the wetting occurs does not hold is true. sent16: the fact that both the nonhierarchicalness and the low-resolutionness occurs is wrong. sent17: if the fact that the potshot does not occur and the ambulating occurs is false the decorousness does not occur. sent18: the fissionableness does not occur if the hardship happens and/or the fissionableness does not occur. sent19: the wetness happens if the ringing does not occur and the fissionableness happens. sent20: if that either the nonhierarchicalness does not occur or the low-resolutionness occurs or both does not hold the honorableness does not occur. sent21: the hardship does not occur. sent22: the lexicalizing preexistence does not occur if the nonhierarchicalness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the nonhierarchicalness but the low-resolutionness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the low-resolutionness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the non-nonhierarchicalness and the low-resolutionness happens is not correct.;
the non-honorableness and the Britannicness occurs.
sent6 & sent21 -> int4: the Britannicness occurs and the lexicalizing iniquity occurs.; int4 -> int5: the Britannicness happens.;
$hypothesis$ = the wetting happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the detribalization does not occur causes that the injunction happens and the instructionalness happens. sent2: not the ringing but the fissionableness occurs if the lexicalizing preexistence does not occur. sent3: the hardship happens and the lexicalizing iniquity occurs if the lexicalizing David does not occur. sent4: the ringing does not occur. sent5: the detribalization does not occur if the irradiating ogler does not occur and the insolubleness does not occur. sent6: that the hardship does not occur triggers that the Britannicness and the lexicalizing iniquity occurs. sent7: the fact that the homeopathicness does not occur but the batching legality happens is not right. sent8: that either the lexicalizing preexistence or the low-resolutionness or both occurs leads to the hierarchicalness. sent9: the low-resolutionness does not occur. sent10: if the doubleheader happens and the conflagration does not occur then the lexicalizing David does not occur. sent11: that the dogfight occurs yields that the irradiating ogler does not occur and the insolubleness does not occur. sent12: if the nonhierarchicalness does not occur then the wetness does not occur. sent13: the irradiating calcification does not occur and the futuristicness occurs if the nonhierarchicalness happens. sent14: that the instructionalness happens leads to that the doubleheader but not the conflagration happens. sent15: if the lexicalizing David does not occur then that the fact that both the fissionableness and the wetting occurs does not hold is true. sent16: the fact that both the nonhierarchicalness and the low-resolutionness occurs is wrong. sent17: if the fact that the potshot does not occur and the ambulating occurs is false the decorousness does not occur. sent18: the fissionableness does not occur if the hardship happens and/or the fissionableness does not occur. sent19: the wetness happens if the ringing does not occur and the fissionableness happens. sent20: if that either the nonhierarchicalness does not occur or the low-resolutionness occurs or both does not hold the honorableness does not occur. sent21: the hardship does not occur. sent22: the lexicalizing preexistence does not occur if the nonhierarchicalness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the nonhierarchicalness but the low-resolutionness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the low-resolutionness happens.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the non-nonhierarchicalness and the low-resolutionness happens is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__