there exists something such that if the fact that it does not dampen and it is not a hate is not incorrect it is terminological.
sent1: something saponifies if it is Deweyan and it does not halve volution. sent2: something that is not a screwup and does not blister slanginess is not a diminutiveness. sent3: if the hardliner is not terminological and it is not maritime then it is a scupper. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a clonidine and does function Aeschylus it does twitch. sent5: there exists something such that if it does dampen and is not a kind of a hate then it is terminological.
the hardliner is a diminutiveness if it is not a screwup and does not blister slanginess.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not dampen and it is not a hate is not incorrect it is terminological. ; $context$ = sent1: something saponifies if it is Deweyan and it does not halve volution. sent2: something that is not a screwup and does not blister slanginess is not a diminutiveness. sent3: if the hardliner is not terminological and it is not maritime then it is a scupper. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a clonidine and does function Aeschylus it does twitch. sent5: there exists something such that if it does dampen and is not a kind of a hate then it is terminological. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__