the spondaicness does not occur and the installation does not occur.
sent1: the counterfire occurs if the structuralness occurs. sent2: the vascularness happens if the spondaicness does not occur and the installation does not occur. sent3: both the structuralness and the non-vascularness occurs. sent4: the snipping happens. sent5: if the basket does not occur and the stultification does not occur then the metrologicalness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spondaicness does not occur and the installation does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the vascularness occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the vascularness does not occur is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the counterfire but not the cremation occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the spondaicness does not occur and the installation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the counterfire occurs if the structuralness occurs. sent2: the vascularness happens if the spondaicness does not occur and the installation does not occur. sent3: both the structuralness and the non-vascularness occurs. sent4: the snipping happens. sent5: if the basket does not occur and the stultification does not occur then the metrologicalness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the spondaicness does not occur and the installation does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the vascularness occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the fact that the vascularness does not occur is not wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__