that if the RH is not provident that the fluke is a plodder but it is not a destructibility does not hold is not false.
sent1: if the RH is glacial then it is provident. sent2: the fact that the fluke is glacial but it is not a plodder is incorrect if the RH is not a kind of a destructibility. sent3: the gulper is not a plodder if the RH is non-catoptric thing that does premeditate Protura. sent4: if something is provident and is not glacial it is not a destructibility. sent5: something that does accelerate weight is gymnosophical. sent6: something premeditates reasoning if that it is vaginal hold. sent7: if the fluke is a kind of a Tombigbee then the RH does accelerate weight. sent8: the fluke is vaginal. sent9: something is a kind of a cytokine if it does premeditate reasoning. sent10: if something is gymnosophical then it is not catoptric and does premeditate Protura. sent11: the fluke is a kind of a plodder that is not a destructibility if the RH is not provident. sent12: something is both provident and not glacial if it is not a plodder. sent13: the fluke is a Tombigbee if it is a cytokine.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the RH is glacial.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the RH is provident.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the RH is not provident.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the RH is not glacial is correct.;
the gulper is not a kind of a destructibility.
sent4 -> int4: the gulper is not a destructibility if it is provident but not glacial.; sent12 -> int5: if the gulper is not a plodder then it is provident and it is not glacial.; sent10 -> int6: if the RH is gymnosophical then it is not catoptric and it does premeditate Protura.; sent5 -> int7: the RH is gymnosophical if it does accelerate weight.; sent9 -> int8: if the fluke premeditates reasoning then it is a kind of a cytokine.; sent6 -> int9: the fluke does premeditate reasoning if it is vaginal.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the fluke does premeditate reasoning.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the fluke is a cytokine.; sent13 & int11 -> int12: the fluke is a Tombigbee.; sent7 & int12 -> int13: that the RH accelerates weight is right.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the RH is gymnosophical.; int6 & int14 -> int15: the RH is not catoptric but it does premeditate Protura.; sent3 & int15 -> int16: the gulper is not a plodder.; int5 & int16 -> int17: the gulper is not improvident but it is not glacial.; int4 & int17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the RH is not provident that the fluke is a plodder but it is not a destructibility does not hold is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the RH is glacial then it is provident. sent2: the fact that the fluke is glacial but it is not a plodder is incorrect if the RH is not a kind of a destructibility. sent3: the gulper is not a plodder if the RH is non-catoptric thing that does premeditate Protura. sent4: if something is provident and is not glacial it is not a destructibility. sent5: something that does accelerate weight is gymnosophical. sent6: something premeditates reasoning if that it is vaginal hold. sent7: if the fluke is a kind of a Tombigbee then the RH does accelerate weight. sent8: the fluke is vaginal. sent9: something is a kind of a cytokine if it does premeditate reasoning. sent10: if something is gymnosophical then it is not catoptric and does premeditate Protura. sent11: the fluke is a kind of a plodder that is not a destructibility if the RH is not provident. sent12: something is both provident and not glacial if it is not a plodder. sent13: the fluke is a Tombigbee if it is a cytokine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the RH is glacial.; sent1 & assump2 -> int1: the RH is provident.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the RH is not provident.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the RH is not glacial is correct.; __UNKNOWN__