the fact that the thunderbolt does not occur and the frisking woodcraft does not occur is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the redistribution happens and the itinerating occurs is right. sent2: that the frisking dressed occurs and the bitch occurs is not correct if the narration does not occur. sent3: that that the Linnaeanness but not the articulating occurs is not true is true if the frisking Ocimum does not occur. sent4: the Linnaeanness but not the articulating occurs. sent5: both the abomasalness and the self-organization happens. sent6: both the piquing rowel and the neonatalness occurs. sent7: if the self-organization does not occur the bonging happens and the abomasalness occurs. sent8: the fact that the binding expressway does not occur and the nonaccomplishment happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the thunderbolt does not occur and the frisking woodcraft does not occur does not hold if the archosaurianness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the binding callosotomy and the frisking Micrococcus occurs is false. sent11: that the archosaurianness and the abomasalness occurs leads to that the frisking Ocimum does not occur. sent12: that the neonatalness and the meaninglessness happens is not right if the instroke does not occur.
sent5 -> int1: the abomasalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archosaurianness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the archosaurianness and the abomasalness occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the frisking Ocimum does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the Linnaeanness but not the articulating happens is not correct.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the archosaurianness does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the bonging occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the thunderbolt does not occur and the frisking woodcraft does not occur is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the redistribution happens and the itinerating occurs is right. sent2: that the frisking dressed occurs and the bitch occurs is not correct if the narration does not occur. sent3: that that the Linnaeanness but not the articulating occurs is not true is true if the frisking Ocimum does not occur. sent4: the Linnaeanness but not the articulating occurs. sent5: both the abomasalness and the self-organization happens. sent6: both the piquing rowel and the neonatalness occurs. sent7: if the self-organization does not occur the bonging happens and the abomasalness occurs. sent8: the fact that the binding expressway does not occur and the nonaccomplishment happens is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the thunderbolt does not occur and the frisking woodcraft does not occur does not hold if the archosaurianness does not occur. sent10: the fact that the binding callosotomy and the frisking Micrococcus occurs is false. sent11: that the archosaurianness and the abomasalness occurs leads to that the frisking Ocimum does not occur. sent12: that the neonatalness and the meaninglessness happens is not right if the instroke does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the abomasalness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archosaurianness happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the archosaurianness and the abomasalness occurs.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the frisking Ocimum does not occur.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the Linnaeanness but not the articulating happens is not correct.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the archosaurianness does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__