that the non-deformationalness and the pleasing happens is not right.
sent1: the conking does not occur. sent2: the pleasing happens if the rendezvousing happens. sent3: that the heating combustible does not occur is not wrong. sent4: that the altitudinalness and the Falstaffianness happens is true if the chasing does not occur. sent5: the deformationalness does not occur if the Falstaffianness and the chase occurs. sent6: the lunching Congridae occurs. sent7: the Simonizing ringer is brought about by that the heating combustible does not occur. sent8: the lunching multiprocessor does not occur. sent9: the Simonizing ringer happens. sent10: if the lunching multiprocessor does not occur then the lunching Congridae occurs and the chasing occurs. sent11: that the Simonizing ringer occurs and the rendezvous occurs is brought about by that the heating combustible does not occur. sent12: that the non-Falstaffianness or the conk or both happens is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Falstaffianness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the non-Falstaffianness and/or the conk occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Falstaffianness happens.; sent10 & sent8 -> int4: both the lunching Congridae and the chase happens.; int4 -> int5: the chase happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: both the Falstaffianness and the chasing happens.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the deformationalness does not occur.; sent11 & sent3 -> int8: both the Simonizing ringer and the rendezvousing happens.; int8 -> int9: the rendezvousing happens.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the pleasing happens.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the altitudinalness and the maundering happens is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = that the non-deformationalness and the pleasing happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the conking does not occur. sent2: the pleasing happens if the rendezvousing happens. sent3: that the heating combustible does not occur is not wrong. sent4: that the altitudinalness and the Falstaffianness happens is true if the chasing does not occur. sent5: the deformationalness does not occur if the Falstaffianness and the chase occurs. sent6: the lunching Congridae occurs. sent7: the Simonizing ringer is brought about by that the heating combustible does not occur. sent8: the lunching multiprocessor does not occur. sent9: the Simonizing ringer happens. sent10: if the lunching multiprocessor does not occur then the lunching Congridae occurs and the chasing occurs. sent11: that the Simonizing ringer occurs and the rendezvous occurs is brought about by that the heating combustible does not occur. sent12: that the non-Falstaffianness or the conk or both happens is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Falstaffianness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the fact that the non-Falstaffianness and/or the conk occurs is not incorrect.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Falstaffianness happens.; sent10 & sent8 -> int4: both the lunching Congridae and the chase happens.; int4 -> int5: the chase happens.; int3 & int5 -> int6: both the Falstaffianness and the chasing happens.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the deformationalness does not occur.; sent11 & sent3 -> int8: both the Simonizing ringer and the rendezvousing happens.; int8 -> int9: the rendezvousing happens.; sent2 & int9 -> int10: the pleasing happens.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__