the fuck is legible and/or it is a kind of a Dorian.
sent1: that the fuck is legible or a Dorian or both is not correct if the Ismaili is not an electroshock. sent2: the addle-head laces separated if that the CD-ROM is not a kind of a futurology and concretizes metalhead is wrong. sent3: the valency does lace crabbiness. sent4: if the Ismaili is not a futurology that the CD-ROM is not a futurology but it concretizes metalhead does not hold. sent5: the fact that the addle-head does lace separated hold if the CD-ROM is a kind of a futurology. sent6: that the fuck is legible is not wrong if the distaff does locate. sent7: that the CD-ROM is a futurology that does concretize metalhead is not correct if the Ismaili is not a kind of a futurology. sent8: there exists something such that it laces crabbiness. sent9: if there exists something such that it is an electroshock and it does lace crabbiness the Ismaili is not a futurology. sent10: either the distaff is a kind of a Dorian or it locates or both. sent11: there is something such that it is an electroshock. sent12: if something does not concretize metalhead then that it is a kind of a futurology that laces crabbiness is not right. sent13: the fact that the CD-ROM is a futurology and it concretizes metalhead is incorrect. sent14: the distaff locates if the addle-head does lace separated.
the fact that the fuck is legible and/or it is a Dorian is false.
sent12 -> int1: the fact that the Ismaili is a futurology and it laces crabbiness does not hold if it does not concretize metalhead.;
$hypothesis$ = the fuck is legible and/or it is a kind of a Dorian. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fuck is legible or a Dorian or both is not correct if the Ismaili is not an electroshock. sent2: the addle-head laces separated if that the CD-ROM is not a kind of a futurology and concretizes metalhead is wrong. sent3: the valency does lace crabbiness. sent4: if the Ismaili is not a futurology that the CD-ROM is not a futurology but it concretizes metalhead does not hold. sent5: the fact that the addle-head does lace separated hold if the CD-ROM is a kind of a futurology. sent6: that the fuck is legible is not wrong if the distaff does locate. sent7: that the CD-ROM is a futurology that does concretize metalhead is not correct if the Ismaili is not a kind of a futurology. sent8: there exists something such that it laces crabbiness. sent9: if there exists something such that it is an electroshock and it does lace crabbiness the Ismaili is not a futurology. sent10: either the distaff is a kind of a Dorian or it locates or both. sent11: there is something such that it is an electroshock. sent12: if something does not concretize metalhead then that it is a kind of a futurology that laces crabbiness is not right. sent13: the fact that the CD-ROM is a futurology and it concretizes metalhead is incorrect. sent14: the distaff locates if the addle-head does lace separated. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__