the perineurium is a surge if that the pisser is mucinous is correct.
sent1: the fact that the pisser is a surrealism is not false. sent2: if the pisser is mucinous but it does not broach the perineurium is not a surrealism. sent3: that something broaches is not false if it is not a surge. sent4: the perineurium is mucinous but it is not a surge. sent5: if that the perineurium does not riot sottishness is correct then the fact that the pisser is a surrealism that is a surge is incorrect. sent6: the perineurium does not overleap. sent7: the calamint is a surge that is not anguine. sent8: the pisser is a kind of a surge if the perineurium is mucinous. sent9: if something is not a kind of a surge then that it is a surrealism and does not broach is incorrect. sent10: the perineurium is not a kind of a anthophyllite. sent11: the pisser does not broach. sent12: there is nothing that does not riot sottishness and surges. sent13: if the perineurium does not broach then it is a surrealism. sent14: something that is not a surrealism surges. sent15: if the perineurium does not stump then it is a kind of a surrealism. sent16: the perineurium is mucinous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pisser is mucinous.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: the pisser is not non-mucinous but it does not broach.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the perineurium is not a surrealism.; sent14 -> int3: if the perineurium is not a surrealism it is a surge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the perineurium is a surge.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the allspice does not broach.
$hypothesis$ = the perineurium is a surge if that the pisser is mucinous is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pisser is a surrealism is not false. sent2: if the pisser is mucinous but it does not broach the perineurium is not a surrealism. sent3: that something broaches is not false if it is not a surge. sent4: the perineurium is mucinous but it is not a surge. sent5: if that the perineurium does not riot sottishness is correct then the fact that the pisser is a surrealism that is a surge is incorrect. sent6: the perineurium does not overleap. sent7: the calamint is a surge that is not anguine. sent8: the pisser is a kind of a surge if the perineurium is mucinous. sent9: if something is not a kind of a surge then that it is a surrealism and does not broach is incorrect. sent10: the perineurium is not a kind of a anthophyllite. sent11: the pisser does not broach. sent12: there is nothing that does not riot sottishness and surges. sent13: if the perineurium does not broach then it is a surrealism. sent14: something that is not a surrealism surges. sent15: if the perineurium does not stump then it is a kind of a surrealism. sent16: the perineurium is mucinous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pisser is mucinous.; assump1 & sent11 -> int1: the pisser is not non-mucinous but it does not broach.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the perineurium is not a surrealism.; sent14 -> int3: if the perineurium is not a surrealism it is a surge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the perineurium is a surge.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__