the fact that if the flanker is not a dodo then the Court is a Stoic is false.
sent1: the Court is a brahman if it is not catoptric. sent2: the fact that the Court is a dodo and is a kind of a brahman does not hold. sent3: the Court is uncomplimentary. sent4: the substation is not non-catoptric. sent5: if the substation is uncomplimentary then it is catoptric. sent6: something that is uncomplimentary is antiferromagnetic thing that is not a dodo. sent7: the domicile is not a dodo. sent8: the blender is catoptric. sent9: that the Court is a kind of a brahman is not incorrect if the fact that it is not majuscule and it is catoptric does not hold. sent10: the flanker is a kind of a Stoic. sent11: the Court is a Stoic if it is a kind of a brahman. sent12: if something is a werewolf the salver does not jiggle blow. sent13: the substation is majuscule if the flanker is not a dodo but it is uncomplimentary. sent14: the fact that the Court is not uncomplimentary but it is catoptric does not hold. sent15: the flanker is catoptric. sent16: the Court is a flier. sent17: the Court is a brahman if the fact that the substation is a kind of a Stoic and it is uncomplimentary is correct. sent18: if the substation is catoptric then the Court is uncomplimentary. sent19: if the substation is uncomplimentary then the flanker is a dodo. sent20: there exists something such that it is a werewolf. sent21: the Court is uncomplimentary if the substation is a kind of a brahman. sent22: that either the Court stuffs pumpernickel or it is not a Stoic or both does not hold if that the substation is not memberless is not false. sent23: the flanker is not flattering if it is a brahman. sent24: the substation is uncomplimentary if the Court is non-majuscule thing that is catoptric.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Court is not majuscule but it is catoptric.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the substation is uncomplimentary.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the flanker is a kind of a dodo.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the flanker is not a dodo.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Court is not majuscule but it is catoptric is not right.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the Court is a brahman.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the Court is a kind of a Stoic.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the flanker is antiferromagnetic.
sent6 -> int7: if the flanker is not flattering it is antiferromagnetic and it is not a dodo.; sent20 & sent12 -> int8: the salver does not jiggle blow.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does not jiggle blow.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the flanker is not a dodo then the Court is a Stoic is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the Court is a brahman if it is not catoptric. sent2: the fact that the Court is a dodo and is a kind of a brahman does not hold. sent3: the Court is uncomplimentary. sent4: the substation is not non-catoptric. sent5: if the substation is uncomplimentary then it is catoptric. sent6: something that is uncomplimentary is antiferromagnetic thing that is not a dodo. sent7: the domicile is not a dodo. sent8: the blender is catoptric. sent9: that the Court is a kind of a brahman is not incorrect if the fact that it is not majuscule and it is catoptric does not hold. sent10: the flanker is a kind of a Stoic. sent11: the Court is a Stoic if it is a kind of a brahman. sent12: if something is a werewolf the salver does not jiggle blow. sent13: the substation is majuscule if the flanker is not a dodo but it is uncomplimentary. sent14: the fact that the Court is not uncomplimentary but it is catoptric does not hold. sent15: the flanker is catoptric. sent16: the Court is a flier. sent17: the Court is a brahman if the fact that the substation is a kind of a Stoic and it is uncomplimentary is correct. sent18: if the substation is catoptric then the Court is uncomplimentary. sent19: if the substation is uncomplimentary then the flanker is a dodo. sent20: there exists something such that it is a werewolf. sent21: the Court is uncomplimentary if the substation is a kind of a brahman. sent22: that either the Court stuffs pumpernickel or it is not a Stoic or both does not hold if that the substation is not memberless is not false. sent23: the flanker is not flattering if it is a brahman. sent24: the substation is uncomplimentary if the Court is non-majuscule thing that is catoptric. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Court is not majuscule but it is catoptric.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the substation is uncomplimentary.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the flanker is a kind of a dodo.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the flanker is not a dodo.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Court is not majuscule but it is catoptric is not right.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the Court is a brahman.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the Court is a kind of a Stoic.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__