the Austronesian does not drag MAO.
sent1: if the appendage does not articulate the Austronesian is a cert. sent2: that the ventriloquist coxes high and does not drag Austronesian is not correct. sent3: if the savior does articulate the hat is oral. sent4: the Austronesian is a kind of a cert that drags MAO if the appendage does not articulate. sent5: if the fact that the appendage is a puffer hold it is not a kind of a collective. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a collective is an oral then that it is not articulate is not wrong. sent7: the appendage does not cox high. sent8: if the appendage does not cox high then it does drag Austronesian and it is a kind of an oral. sent9: the fact that the scallion drags MAO but it is not a collective does not hold if there exists something such that that it does not put ventriloquist is not false. sent10: something does articulate if it is a kind of a cert. sent11: That the ventriloquist does not put scallion hold. sent12: the savior is a kind of a cert if there exists something such that the fact that it coxes high and it does not drag Austronesian does not hold. sent13: the appendage does drag Austronesian if it does not cox high. sent14: if that something is not a puffer but it is a drone is not true then it is not a collective. sent15: a puffer is not a kind of a collective. sent16: if the scallion does not put ventriloquist then the fact that the appendage is not a puffer but it drones is wrong. sent17: that the scallion does not put ventriloquist hold. sent18: if that the appendage is non-oral but it does put ventriloquist is false then it does not put ventriloquist. sent19: the fact that the appendage is not an oral but it does put ventriloquist is not correct if there exists something such that that it is oral is true. sent20: The high does not cox appendage. sent21: the fact that the appendage is a puffer and is a kind of a drone is wrong if the scallion does not put ventriloquist.
sent16 & sent17 -> int1: that the appendage is both not a puffer and a drone is not right.; sent14 -> int2: if that the appendage is not a puffer but it does drone is incorrect it is not collective.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the appendage is not collective.; sent8 & sent7 -> int4: the appendage drags Austronesian and is an oral.; int4 -> int5: the appendage is an oral.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the appendage is a kind of non-collective an oral.; sent6 -> int7: the appendage does not articulate if it is non-collective and it is an oral.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the appendage is not articulate is not false.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the Austronesian is a cert and it does drag MAO.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the Austronesian does not drag MAO.
sent10 -> int10: the savior does articulate if it is a cert.; sent2 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it does cox high and it does not drag Austronesian is wrong.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: the savior is a cert.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the savior does articulate.; sent3 & int13 -> int14: the hat is a kind of an oral.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that it is a kind of an oral.; int15 & sent19 -> int16: that the appendage is non-oral thing that does put ventriloquist does not hold.; sent18 & int16 -> int17: the appendage does not put ventriloquist.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that that it does not put ventriloquist hold.; int18 & sent9 -> int19: the fact that the scallion drags MAO and is not a collective does not hold.; int19 -> int20: the fact that there is something such that that it drags MAO and is not a kind of a collective is not true is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Austronesian does not drag MAO. ; $context$ = sent1: if the appendage does not articulate the Austronesian is a cert. sent2: that the ventriloquist coxes high and does not drag Austronesian is not correct. sent3: if the savior does articulate the hat is oral. sent4: the Austronesian is a kind of a cert that drags MAO if the appendage does not articulate. sent5: if the fact that the appendage is a puffer hold it is not a kind of a collective. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a collective is an oral then that it is not articulate is not wrong. sent7: the appendage does not cox high. sent8: if the appendage does not cox high then it does drag Austronesian and it is a kind of an oral. sent9: the fact that the scallion drags MAO but it is not a collective does not hold if there exists something such that that it does not put ventriloquist is not false. sent10: something does articulate if it is a kind of a cert. sent11: That the ventriloquist does not put scallion hold. sent12: the savior is a kind of a cert if there exists something such that the fact that it coxes high and it does not drag Austronesian does not hold. sent13: the appendage does drag Austronesian if it does not cox high. sent14: if that something is not a puffer but it is a drone is not true then it is not a collective. sent15: a puffer is not a kind of a collective. sent16: if the scallion does not put ventriloquist then the fact that the appendage is not a puffer but it drones is wrong. sent17: that the scallion does not put ventriloquist hold. sent18: if that the appendage is non-oral but it does put ventriloquist is false then it does not put ventriloquist. sent19: the fact that the appendage is not an oral but it does put ventriloquist is not correct if there exists something such that that it is oral is true. sent20: The high does not cox appendage. sent21: the fact that the appendage is a puffer and is a kind of a drone is wrong if the scallion does not put ventriloquist. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent17 -> int1: that the appendage is both not a puffer and a drone is not right.; sent14 -> int2: if that the appendage is not a puffer but it does drone is incorrect it is not collective.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the appendage is not collective.; sent8 & sent7 -> int4: the appendage drags Austronesian and is an oral.; int4 -> int5: the appendage is an oral.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the appendage is a kind of non-collective an oral.; sent6 -> int7: the appendage does not articulate if it is non-collective and it is an oral.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the appendage is not articulate is not false.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: the Austronesian is a cert and it does drag MAO.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__