there is something such that if it is not a kind of a bishop and is not an intercession then it is a Sue.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a pulsar and it does not sentimentalise why the fact that it is a befoulment hold. sent2: something that is not a kind of a critic and is not a hotchpotch is not a stumping. sent3: the wavefront is a befoulment if the fact that it is not gingival and it is not a bishop is right. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a Cnidoscolus and not a cyanohydrin then it is a critic. sent5: if a bishop is not an intercession then it is a kind of a Sue. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a Grainger is a kind of a Hymen it is a kind of a Bellini. sent7: if the Cataflam is geophysical and is not Frostian it is bracteate. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a phosphoprotein and not a spirit hold it is a kind of a Derain. sent9: there is something such that if it is both a bishop and not an intercession then it is a Sue.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a kind of a bishop and is not an intercession then it is a Sue. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a pulsar and it does not sentimentalise why the fact that it is a befoulment hold. sent2: something that is not a kind of a critic and is not a hotchpotch is not a stumping. sent3: the wavefront is a befoulment if the fact that it is not gingival and it is not a bishop is right. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a Cnidoscolus and not a cyanohydrin then it is a critic. sent5: if a bishop is not an intercession then it is a kind of a Sue. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a Grainger is a kind of a Hymen it is a kind of a Bellini. sent7: if the Cataflam is geophysical and is not Frostian it is bracteate. sent8: there is something such that if that it is not a phosphoprotein and not a spirit hold it is a kind of a Derain. sent9: there is something such that if it is both a bishop and not an intercession then it is a Sue. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__