the paperknife is not a George.
sent1: the midinette justifies floccule. sent2: the diffuser does justify floccule if it is not non-atheistic. sent3: that the diffuser does relace adulterant and it is atheistic is incorrect. sent4: something justifies floccule if the fact that it relaces adulterant and it is not atheistic is not true. sent5: if the yellowfin is a popover that the diffuser does relace adulterant and is not atheistic is not true. sent6: the yellowfin is a popover. sent7: if the subduction is a kind of a popover that the yellowfin is a kind of a George but it does not prod exponential is not right. sent8: the yellowfin does not housekeep follow-on and is asymmetrical if the diffuser is not non-Turkic. sent9: the paperknife justifies floccule. sent10: the subduction does prod exponential if the diffuser does justify floccule. sent11: if the diffuser is a popover then the yellowfin does justify floccule. sent12: the paperknife does not justify floccule if the fact that the yellowfin does justify floccule and prods exponential does not hold. sent13: something is not a kind of a George and it is not a kind of a popover if it does not justify floccule. sent14: if something does not housekeep follow-on then the fact that it justifies floccule and it does prod exponential is not right. sent15: the diffuser prods exponential. sent16: the paperknife is a George if the subduction does prod exponential. sent17: if something is a George then it does prod exponential. sent18: the diffuser is a George if the paperknife is atheistic.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: that the diffuser relaces adulterant and is not atheistic is not right.; sent4 -> int2: if the fact that the diffuser does relace adulterant and is not atheistic is not correct then it justifies floccule.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diffuser justifies floccule.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the subduction prods exponential.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
the paperknife is not a kind of a George.
sent13 -> int5: the paperknife is not a kind of a George and is not a popover if it does not justify floccule.; sent14 -> int6: that the yellowfin does justify floccule and it prods exponential is incorrect if it does not housekeep follow-on.;
$hypothesis$ = the paperknife is not a George. ; $context$ = sent1: the midinette justifies floccule. sent2: the diffuser does justify floccule if it is not non-atheistic. sent3: that the diffuser does relace adulterant and it is atheistic is incorrect. sent4: something justifies floccule if the fact that it relaces adulterant and it is not atheistic is not true. sent5: if the yellowfin is a popover that the diffuser does relace adulterant and is not atheistic is not true. sent6: the yellowfin is a popover. sent7: if the subduction is a kind of a popover that the yellowfin is a kind of a George but it does not prod exponential is not right. sent8: the yellowfin does not housekeep follow-on and is asymmetrical if the diffuser is not non-Turkic. sent9: the paperknife justifies floccule. sent10: the subduction does prod exponential if the diffuser does justify floccule. sent11: if the diffuser is a popover then the yellowfin does justify floccule. sent12: the paperknife does not justify floccule if the fact that the yellowfin does justify floccule and prods exponential does not hold. sent13: something is not a kind of a George and it is not a kind of a popover if it does not justify floccule. sent14: if something does not housekeep follow-on then the fact that it justifies floccule and it does prod exponential is not right. sent15: the diffuser prods exponential. sent16: the paperknife is a George if the subduction does prod exponential. sent17: if something is a George then it does prod exponential. sent18: the diffuser is a George if the paperknife is atheistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: that the diffuser relaces adulterant and is not atheistic is not right.; sent4 -> int2: if the fact that the diffuser does relace adulterant and is not atheistic is not correct then it justifies floccule.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the diffuser justifies floccule.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the subduction prods exponential.; int4 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__