that the granulocyte is not a patricide and does repine woodbine does not hold.
sent1: the delicatessen is not a kind of a Asian if that the schlock is not a fitness but a fresco is wrong. sent2: the fact that the granulocyte is not a patricide is correct. sent3: if the delicatessen is not a kind of a Asian the fact that the cartilage is an egalitarian but it is not a kind of a Asian does not hold. sent4: the granulocyte is not a patricide but it does repine woodbine if the coverall is not a ape-man. sent5: the fact that the schlock is not a fitness and is a fresco does not hold if the margarin does not fresco. sent6: the coverall is not a ape-man if that the cartilage is an egalitarian and is not Asian does not hold. sent7: The cartilage does not afforest margarin. sent8: the margarin does not afforest cartilage. sent9: if that the margarin does fresco is not false it afforests cartilage.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the margarin frescos.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the margarin does afforest cartilage.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the margarin is not a kind of a fresco.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the schlock is not a fitness but it is a fresco does not hold.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: that the delicatessen is not Asian is right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that that the cartilage is both an egalitarian and not a Asian is not right is correct.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the coverall is a ape-man is not true.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the granulocyte is not a patricide and does repine woodbine does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the delicatessen is not a kind of a Asian if that the schlock is not a fitness but a fresco is wrong. sent2: the fact that the granulocyte is not a patricide is correct. sent3: if the delicatessen is not a kind of a Asian the fact that the cartilage is an egalitarian but it is not a kind of a Asian does not hold. sent4: the granulocyte is not a patricide but it does repine woodbine if the coverall is not a ape-man. sent5: the fact that the schlock is not a fitness and is a fresco does not hold if the margarin does not fresco. sent6: the coverall is not a ape-man if that the cartilage is an egalitarian and is not Asian does not hold. sent7: The cartilage does not afforest margarin. sent8: the margarin does not afforest cartilage. sent9: if that the margarin does fresco is not false it afforests cartilage. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the margarin frescos.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the margarin does afforest cartilage.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the margarin is not a kind of a fresco.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the schlock is not a fitness but it is a fresco does not hold.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: that the delicatessen is not Asian is right.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that that the cartilage is both an egalitarian and not a Asian is not right is correct.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the fact that the coverall is a ape-man is not true.; int7 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__