the garibaldi does not bead Gallirallus.
sent1: the garibaldi is augitic. sent2: the breeze is not biologistic. sent3: the fact that the goffer is legible is true. sent4: the garibaldi is not fiber-optic if the fact that it is criminological and is biologistic is incorrect. sent5: if the Explorer does not ice Dicrostonyx then the fact that it is a kind of Rosicrucian thing that does ice transpiration is not correct. sent6: the garibaldi is not biologistic if it is not unproductive. sent7: something spoons hang-up and does not ice insider if it is not convenient. sent8: if the garibaldi is not a gangliocyte that it is not non-biologistic and it is a megaton is not right. sent9: the garibaldi is biologistic. sent10: something is biologistic and a French if it does not enslave crore. sent11: the garibaldi is not biologistic if the fact that it does lave and it is unproductive does not hold. sent12: that the garibaldi does lave and is unproductive is false if it does not bead Gallirallus. sent13: if the goffer is legible then the insider does not bead Gallirallus and does not bead Dracunculus. sent14: everything is not convenient.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the garibaldi beads Gallirallus is not correct.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the garibaldi laves and is unproductive is wrong.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the garibaldi is not biologistic.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the insider laves.
sent10 -> int4: the insider is both not non-biologistic and a French if it does not enslave crore.; sent7 -> int5: if the fact that the ferrite is not convenient is not false it does spoon hang-up and does not ice insider.; sent14 -> int6: the ferrite is not convenient.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the ferrite does spoon hang-up and does not ice insider hold.; int7 -> int8: everything does spoon hang-up and it does not ice insider.; int8 -> int9: the garibaldi does spoon hang-up but it does not ice insider.; sent3 & sent13 -> int10: the insider does not bead Gallirallus and it does not bead Dracunculus.; int10 -> int11: the insider does not bead Gallirallus.;
$hypothesis$ = the garibaldi does not bead Gallirallus. ; $context$ = sent1: the garibaldi is augitic. sent2: the breeze is not biologistic. sent3: the fact that the goffer is legible is true. sent4: the garibaldi is not fiber-optic if the fact that it is criminological and is biologistic is incorrect. sent5: if the Explorer does not ice Dicrostonyx then the fact that it is a kind of Rosicrucian thing that does ice transpiration is not correct. sent6: the garibaldi is not biologistic if it is not unproductive. sent7: something spoons hang-up and does not ice insider if it is not convenient. sent8: if the garibaldi is not a gangliocyte that it is not non-biologistic and it is a megaton is not right. sent9: the garibaldi is biologistic. sent10: something is biologistic and a French if it does not enslave crore. sent11: the garibaldi is not biologistic if the fact that it does lave and it is unproductive does not hold. sent12: that the garibaldi does lave and is unproductive is false if it does not bead Gallirallus. sent13: if the goffer is legible then the insider does not bead Gallirallus and does not bead Dracunculus. sent14: everything is not convenient. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the garibaldi beads Gallirallus is not correct.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the garibaldi laves and is unproductive is wrong.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the garibaldi is not biologistic.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__