the leatherwood is not a Armagnac.
sent1: the leatherwood is not a skit if it is a uplink. sent2: the fact that the compost is a hedonist hold if there is something such that that it does not exult Krypterophaneron and is not acculturational is wrong. sent3: that something does not exult Krypterophaneron and is not acculturational is incorrect if it does not clap coxswain. sent4: that the leatherwood does interpose hold. sent5: the load is not a WIMP if the leatherwood is not a skit but it is a Armagnac. sent6: if there is something such that it is a hedonist the fact that the hobby is non-cybernetics or does not heighten or both does not hold. sent7: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a Armagnac and it claws saber does not hold then the load is not a Armagnac. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a skit and/or does not interpose is not true if it is not a kind of a Armagnac. sent9: if something is a twenty-twenty then it is a kind of a WIMP. sent10: the usance is not actable. sent11: the fact that the load is interrogative is not incorrect. sent12: the gulch does not clap coxswain if there is something such that it is a studbook. sent13: if the fact that the load is a kind of a skit and/or it does not interpose is not true then the leatherwood is a kind of a twenty-twenty. sent14: if the usance is not actable it is a studbook and corrodes load. sent15: if that the load does not claw saber hold the leatherwood is not a WIMP and is not a twenty-twenty. sent16: that something is not a uplink and is interrogative does not hold if it interposes. sent17: the Oglala is not cybernetics if that the hobby either is not cybernetics or does not heighten or both is false. sent18: if the fact that something is not non-cybernetics but it does not undo is wrong it does not claw saber. sent19: the load is a kind of a twenty-twenty. sent20: something is a kind of a WIMP and undoes if it is not cybernetics. sent21: if something does not interpose and is a kind of a skit then it is a Armagnac. sent22: if something is a Tenniel it does liberate. sent23: if that the leatherwood is not a uplink but it is interrogative is wrong it is not a skit. sent24: if there is something such that it is a WIMP that the fact that the forefoot is a kind of a Armagnac that claws saber is not correct hold.
sent16 -> int1: that the leatherwood is both not a uplink and a interrogative is not correct if it interposes.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the leatherwood is not a uplink but a interrogative is incorrect.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the leatherwood is not a skit.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leatherwood is a Armagnac.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the leatherwood is not a skit but a Armagnac.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the load is not a WIMP.; sent9 -> int6: the load is a kind of a WIMP if it is a twenty-twenty.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the load is a kind of a WIMP.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the leatherwood is a kind of a Armagnac.
sent21 -> int9: the leatherwood is a kind of a Armagnac if it does not interpose and it is a kind of a skit.; sent18 -> int10: if that the load is a kind of cybernetics thing that does not undo is not correct then it does not claw saber.;
$hypothesis$ = the leatherwood is not a Armagnac. ; $context$ = sent1: the leatherwood is not a skit if it is a uplink. sent2: the fact that the compost is a hedonist hold if there is something such that that it does not exult Krypterophaneron and is not acculturational is wrong. sent3: that something does not exult Krypterophaneron and is not acculturational is incorrect if it does not clap coxswain. sent4: that the leatherwood does interpose hold. sent5: the load is not a WIMP if the leatherwood is not a skit but it is a Armagnac. sent6: if there is something such that it is a hedonist the fact that the hobby is non-cybernetics or does not heighten or both does not hold. sent7: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a Armagnac and it claws saber does not hold then the load is not a Armagnac. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of a skit and/or does not interpose is not true if it is not a kind of a Armagnac. sent9: if something is a twenty-twenty then it is a kind of a WIMP. sent10: the usance is not actable. sent11: the fact that the load is interrogative is not incorrect. sent12: the gulch does not clap coxswain if there is something such that it is a studbook. sent13: if the fact that the load is a kind of a skit and/or it does not interpose is not true then the leatherwood is a kind of a twenty-twenty. sent14: if the usance is not actable it is a studbook and corrodes load. sent15: if that the load does not claw saber hold the leatherwood is not a WIMP and is not a twenty-twenty. sent16: that something is not a uplink and is interrogative does not hold if it interposes. sent17: the Oglala is not cybernetics if that the hobby either is not cybernetics or does not heighten or both is false. sent18: if the fact that something is not non-cybernetics but it does not undo is wrong it does not claw saber. sent19: the load is a kind of a twenty-twenty. sent20: something is a kind of a WIMP and undoes if it is not cybernetics. sent21: if something does not interpose and is a kind of a skit then it is a Armagnac. sent22: if something is a Tenniel it does liberate. sent23: if that the leatherwood is not a uplink but it is interrogative is wrong it is not a skit. sent24: if there is something such that it is a WIMP that the fact that the forefoot is a kind of a Armagnac that claws saber is not correct hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: that the leatherwood is both not a uplink and a interrogative is not correct if it interposes.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that the leatherwood is not a uplink but a interrogative is incorrect.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: the leatherwood is not a skit.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leatherwood is a Armagnac.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the leatherwood is not a skit but a Armagnac.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the load is not a WIMP.; sent9 -> int6: the load is a kind of a WIMP if it is a twenty-twenty.; int6 & sent19 -> int7: the load is a kind of a WIMP.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__