that the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil if the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish is not correct.
sent1: the knockoff is a plangency. sent2: the cetacean nests Alonso. sent3: something does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish if the fact that it is not a plangency is not wrong. sent4: if something is not a kind of a plangency then the fact that it does nest Alonso and it is not foolish is not correct. sent5: there is something such that it inscribes. sent6: if something is not a plangency that it does not nest Alonso and is not foolish is not true. sent7: if something does inscribe and does neglect propylthiouracil that the abrogator is not a plangency is not false. sent8: if the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is not foolish the knockoff does neglect propylthiouracil. sent9: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is not non-foolish is incorrect if it is not a kind of a plangency. sent10: the fact that the abrogator does nest Alonso and is not foolish is not correct if it is not a plangency. sent11: the abrogator is not foolish. sent12: if the knockoff is not a plangency and it is not foolish the abrogator does not inscribe. sent13: the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil if the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is foolish. sent14: if the abrogator nests Alonso and is not foolish the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil. sent15: if something that does not nest Alonso is foolish it does neglect propylthiouracil. sent16: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso but it is not non-foolish is incorrect. sent17: the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is not foolish if it is not a plangency. sent18: everything inscribes. sent19: the abrogator neglects barong.
sent18 -> int1: the knockoff inscribes.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the knockoff neglects propylthiouracil is not incorrect.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the knockoff inscribes and it does neglect propylthiouracil.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it inscribes and neglects propylthiouracil.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the abrogator is not a plangency.; sent6 -> int5: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish is false if it is not a plangency.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish.; int6 & assump1 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the polls is a plangency.
sent15 -> int9: the polls neglects propylthiouracil if it does not nest Alonso and is foolish.; sent19 -> int10: something neglects barong.;
$hypothesis$ = that the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil if the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the knockoff is a plangency. sent2: the cetacean nests Alonso. sent3: something does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish if the fact that it is not a plangency is not wrong. sent4: if something is not a kind of a plangency then the fact that it does nest Alonso and it is not foolish is not correct. sent5: there is something such that it inscribes. sent6: if something is not a plangency that it does not nest Alonso and is not foolish is not true. sent7: if something does inscribe and does neglect propylthiouracil that the abrogator is not a plangency is not false. sent8: if the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is not foolish the knockoff does neglect propylthiouracil. sent9: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is not non-foolish is incorrect if it is not a kind of a plangency. sent10: the fact that the abrogator does nest Alonso and is not foolish is not correct if it is not a plangency. sent11: the abrogator is not foolish. sent12: if the knockoff is not a plangency and it is not foolish the abrogator does not inscribe. sent13: the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil if the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is foolish. sent14: if the abrogator nests Alonso and is not foolish the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil. sent15: if something that does not nest Alonso is foolish it does neglect propylthiouracil. sent16: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso but it is not non-foolish is incorrect. sent17: the abrogator does not nest Alonso and is not foolish if it is not a plangency. sent18: everything inscribes. sent19: the abrogator neglects barong. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: the knockoff inscribes.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the fact that the knockoff neglects propylthiouracil is not incorrect.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the knockoff inscribes and it does neglect propylthiouracil.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it inscribes and neglects propylthiouracil.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the abrogator is not a plangency.; sent6 -> int5: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish is false if it is not a plangency.; int4 & int5 -> int6: that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abrogator does not nest Alonso and it is not foolish.; int6 & assump1 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the knockoff does not neglect propylthiouracil.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__