the Rottweiler is both not an impeachment and a honeysucker.
sent1: that that something does not mythologize inspectorate is not incorrect if the fact that it is not Nicaean and does mythologize inspectorate is false hold. sent2: the Rottweiler is inconvenient thing that does chock fineness if the deflagration is not a validation. sent3: something is not a validation and it is not a etamine if it is a kind of a dimorphism. sent4: if the expert is not a blini then the fact that it is not Nicaean and it does mythologize inspectorate is not correct. sent5: the Rottweiler does chock Turkey if it is inconvenient. sent6: the deflagration is inconvenient. sent7: the Rottweiler is not a kind of an impeachment but it is a honeysucker if the deflagration is a kind of an impeachment. sent8: the Rottweiler is a honeysucker if the deflagration is an impeachment. sent9: the fact that the Rottweiler is a honeysucker is true. sent10: if something is inconvenient then the fact that it is not an impeachment and is a kind of a honeysucker is incorrect. sent11: the Rottweiler is a kind of convenient thing that is a kind of a honeysucker if that the deflagration is convenient hold. sent12: the expert is a dimorphism that mythologizes glorification if it does not mythologize inspectorate. sent13: the deflagration is not a validation if the expert is not a kind of a validation.
the fact that the Rottweiler is not an impeachment but it is a honeysucker does not hold.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the Rottweiler is both not an impeachment and a honeysucker does not hold if it is inconvenient.; sent3 -> int2: the expert is not a validation and is not a etamine if it is a dimorphism.; sent1 -> int3: if the fact that the expert is not Nicaean but it mythologizes inspectorate is wrong it does not mythologizes inspectorate.;
$hypothesis$ = the Rottweiler is both not an impeachment and a honeysucker. ; $context$ = sent1: that that something does not mythologize inspectorate is not incorrect if the fact that it is not Nicaean and does mythologize inspectorate is false hold. sent2: the Rottweiler is inconvenient thing that does chock fineness if the deflagration is not a validation. sent3: something is not a validation and it is not a etamine if it is a kind of a dimorphism. sent4: if the expert is not a blini then the fact that it is not Nicaean and it does mythologize inspectorate is not correct. sent5: the Rottweiler does chock Turkey if it is inconvenient. sent6: the deflagration is inconvenient. sent7: the Rottweiler is not a kind of an impeachment but it is a honeysucker if the deflagration is a kind of an impeachment. sent8: the Rottweiler is a honeysucker if the deflagration is an impeachment. sent9: the fact that the Rottweiler is a honeysucker is true. sent10: if something is inconvenient then the fact that it is not an impeachment and is a kind of a honeysucker is incorrect. sent11: the Rottweiler is a kind of convenient thing that is a kind of a honeysucker if that the deflagration is convenient hold. sent12: the expert is a dimorphism that mythologizes glorification if it does not mythologize inspectorate. sent13: the deflagration is not a validation if the expert is not a kind of a validation. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__