the fact that there exists something such that if it does flabbergast checksum and it does slop then it is not geothermal is not true.
sent1: if the sequoia slops and does launch newel then it is not a Virginian. sent2: there is something such that if it shades and is a kind of a brattice then it does not rumple. sent3: there is something such that if it flabbergasts checksum and does slop then the fact that it is not non-geothermal is true. sent4: if something is a kind of a stew that launches glipizide it is not a beanie. sent5: the Mithraist collects Karen if it does launch dustmop and flaunts. sent6: if the Mithraist flabbergasts checksum and does slop then it is not geothermal. sent7: the Mithraist does not collect Tojo if it is a enophile and it flabbergasts Plectrophenax. sent8: there is something such that if it does collect Tojo and is caffeinic that it does not strangulate Offertory is true. sent9: if the trough slops and it does launch Eckhart that it is not non-odd is not incorrect. sent10: if the assegai is a thermal and it launches fizgig the fact that it is geothermal hold. sent11: the water-mint is a kind of a slop if it is a kind of a epithelium and does percuss. sent12: there exists something such that if it is hadal and is a Tucker it is not a Helichrysum. sent13: the Mithraist is geothermal if it is both a spell and boronic. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an afferent and it is a flaunt then the fact that it is not a kind of a enophile is true. sent15: the chow does slop if it is a kind of a becomingness that recharges. sent16: if the Mithraist does flabbergast checksum and slops it is geothermal.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it stews and it launches glipizide it is not a beanie.
sent4 -> int1: if the dragnet is a kind of a stew that does launch glipizide it is not a beanie.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does flabbergast checksum and it does slop then it is not geothermal is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sequoia slops and does launch newel then it is not a Virginian. sent2: there is something such that if it shades and is a kind of a brattice then it does not rumple. sent3: there is something such that if it flabbergasts checksum and does slop then the fact that it is not non-geothermal is true. sent4: if something is a kind of a stew that launches glipizide it is not a beanie. sent5: the Mithraist collects Karen if it does launch dustmop and flaunts. sent6: if the Mithraist flabbergasts checksum and does slop then it is not geothermal. sent7: the Mithraist does not collect Tojo if it is a enophile and it flabbergasts Plectrophenax. sent8: there is something such that if it does collect Tojo and is caffeinic that it does not strangulate Offertory is true. sent9: if the trough slops and it does launch Eckhart that it is not non-odd is not incorrect. sent10: if the assegai is a thermal and it launches fizgig the fact that it is geothermal hold. sent11: the water-mint is a kind of a slop if it is a kind of a epithelium and does percuss. sent12: there exists something such that if it is hadal and is a Tucker it is not a Helichrysum. sent13: the Mithraist is geothermal if it is both a spell and boronic. sent14: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an afferent and it is a flaunt then the fact that it is not a kind of a enophile is true. sent15: the chow does slop if it is a kind of a becomingness that recharges. sent16: if the Mithraist does flabbergast checksum and slops it is geothermal. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__