the pilocarpine is not a ruin.
sent1: something is Cyprian but it is not flaky if the fact that it is improper hold. sent2: if that the two-timer either is not a whitethorn or is not unimodal or both is incorrect it is a kind of a ruin. sent3: the trypsinogen corrodes and/or it is not a Astrophyton if the sucker is not a kind of an etiology. sent4: if the trypsinogen does not corrode then the whitetail is a Astrophyton. sent5: the pilocarpine is not a Rhabdoviridae and/or it is lengthwise. sent6: the whitetail is a Astrophyton. sent7: that the sucker is not a whitethorn or is not an etiology or both is wrong if the Freudian is not a kind of a whitethorn. sent8: if the pilocarpine ruins and it is a tug the Freudian is not a whitethorn. sent9: if something is a rhizoid and it vibrates the whitetail does not peck sucker. sent10: that everything is improper is not incorrect. sent11: the Freudian is an etiology if that the sucker is a kind of a Astrophyton but it does not corrode is incorrect. sent12: the pilocarpine is a kind of a Rhabdoviridae and/or is lengthwise. sent13: the fact that the trypsinogen does not corrode is not wrong if the pocketbook does corrode. sent14: the fact that the pocketbook corrodes is true. sent15: if something is both an etiology and unimodal then it does not tug. sent16: if the fact that the Freudian is a whitethorn and/or is not a kind of a ruin is wrong then the pilocarpine does ruin. sent17: if something is not flaky then that it is both a grounding and upstage is right. sent18: if something is a grounding then that it is a kind of a Astrophyton and it does not corrode does not hold. sent19: the pilocarpine is a tug if it either is not a kind of a Rhabdoviridae or is lengthwise or both. sent20: there exists something such that it is a rhizoid that does vibrate. sent21: the whitetail is a kind of non-unimodal thing that is a kind of a Astrophyton if the trypsinogen does not corrode. sent22: if the whitetail is not unimodal then the sucker is not a kind of a whitethorn and/or it is not a kind of an etiology. sent23: that the Freudian does tunnel Yorktown and is unimodal if there exists something such that it does not peck sucker is correct. sent24: the sucker is a whitethorn if the Freudian is not a whitethorn.
sent19 & sent5 -> int1: that the pilocarpine tugs is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pilocarpine does ruin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pilocarpine is a kind of a ruin that is a tug.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Freudian is not a whitethorn.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the sucker is not a kind of a whitethorn and/or is not a kind of an etiology is not right.; sent13 & sent14 -> int5: the trypsinogen does not corrode.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the whitetail is not unimodal but it is a Astrophyton.; int6 -> int7: the whitetail is not unimodal.; sent22 & int7 -> int8: the sucker is not a whitethorn and/or it is not an etiology.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the pilocarpine is a kind of a ruin.
sent15 -> int10: the Freudian does not tug if it is a kind of an etiology and is unimodal.; sent17 -> int11: the trypsinogen is a kind of a grounding and it is an upstage if it is not flaky.; sent1 -> int12: if the pocketbook is improper then it is Cyprian and it is not flaky.; sent10 -> int13: the fact that the pocketbook is improper hold.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the pocketbook is both not non-Cyprian and not flaky.; int14 -> int15: everything is Cyprian and it is not flaky.; int15 -> int16: the trypsinogen is Cyprian and is not flaky.; int16 -> int17: the trypsinogen is not flaky.; int11 & int17 -> int18: the trypsinogen grounds and it is an upstage.; int18 -> int19: everything is a kind of a grounding and it upstages.; int19 -> int20: the sucker is a kind of a grounding and it is a kind of an upstage.; int20 -> int21: the sucker does ground.; sent18 -> int22: the fact that the sucker is a kind of a Astrophyton that does not corrode is not true if it does ground.; int21 & int22 -> int23: that the sucker is a kind of a Astrophyton that does not corrode is not correct.; sent11 & int23 -> int24: the Freudian is a kind of an etiology.; sent20 & sent9 -> int25: the whitetail does not peck sucker.; int25 -> int26: there exists something such that the fact that it does not peck sucker is true.; int26 & sent23 -> int27: the Freudian tunnels Yorktown and it is unimodal.; int27 -> int28: the Freudian is unimodal.; int24 & int28 -> int29: the Freudian is an etiology and it is unimodal.; int10 & int29 -> int30: the Freudian does not tug.;
$hypothesis$ = the pilocarpine is not a ruin. ; $context$ = sent1: something is Cyprian but it is not flaky if the fact that it is improper hold. sent2: if that the two-timer either is not a whitethorn or is not unimodal or both is incorrect it is a kind of a ruin. sent3: the trypsinogen corrodes and/or it is not a Astrophyton if the sucker is not a kind of an etiology. sent4: if the trypsinogen does not corrode then the whitetail is a Astrophyton. sent5: the pilocarpine is not a Rhabdoviridae and/or it is lengthwise. sent6: the whitetail is a Astrophyton. sent7: that the sucker is not a whitethorn or is not an etiology or both is wrong if the Freudian is not a kind of a whitethorn. sent8: if the pilocarpine ruins and it is a tug the Freudian is not a whitethorn. sent9: if something is a rhizoid and it vibrates the whitetail does not peck sucker. sent10: that everything is improper is not incorrect. sent11: the Freudian is an etiology if that the sucker is a kind of a Astrophyton but it does not corrode is incorrect. sent12: the pilocarpine is a kind of a Rhabdoviridae and/or is lengthwise. sent13: the fact that the trypsinogen does not corrode is not wrong if the pocketbook does corrode. sent14: the fact that the pocketbook corrodes is true. sent15: if something is both an etiology and unimodal then it does not tug. sent16: if the fact that the Freudian is a whitethorn and/or is not a kind of a ruin is wrong then the pilocarpine does ruin. sent17: if something is not flaky then that it is both a grounding and upstage is right. sent18: if something is a grounding then that it is a kind of a Astrophyton and it does not corrode does not hold. sent19: the pilocarpine is a tug if it either is not a kind of a Rhabdoviridae or is lengthwise or both. sent20: there exists something such that it is a rhizoid that does vibrate. sent21: the whitetail is a kind of non-unimodal thing that is a kind of a Astrophyton if the trypsinogen does not corrode. sent22: if the whitetail is not unimodal then the sucker is not a kind of a whitethorn and/or it is not a kind of an etiology. sent23: that the Freudian does tunnel Yorktown and is unimodal if there exists something such that it does not peck sucker is correct. sent24: the sucker is a whitethorn if the Freudian is not a whitethorn. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent5 -> int1: that the pilocarpine tugs is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pilocarpine does ruin.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the pilocarpine is a kind of a ruin that is a tug.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the Freudian is not a whitethorn.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that the sucker is not a kind of a whitethorn and/or is not a kind of an etiology is not right.; sent13 & sent14 -> int5: the trypsinogen does not corrode.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the whitetail is not unimodal but it is a Astrophyton.; int6 -> int7: the whitetail is not unimodal.; sent22 & int7 -> int8: the sucker is not a whitethorn and/or it is not an etiology.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__