the dictostylium is Mycenaean.
sent1: the log is not a Cairo. sent2: that the dictostylium is both not Mycenaean and Aristotelian is incorrect if it does not brazen Pagurus. sent3: the dictostylium is not Mycenaean if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a metonymy and it does percolate is not right. sent4: the dictostylium is Aristotelian. sent5: there exists something such that it is both not a metonymy and a percolate. sent6: the homegirl is a Aristotelian. sent7: if something is a metonymy then the homegirl is not Mycenaean. sent8: the bubbler is a kind of a brave. sent9: the dictostylium is not Mycenaean if something does not percolate. sent10: the fact that if the log is not the Cairo then the log does not override Bunyan and is not a right is true. sent11: the homegirl is not Mycenaean if the dictostylium is a kind of a metonymy and it brazens Pagurus. sent12: if the broodmare is not a slop then that the silverwork is a kind of a metonymy but it is not a kind of a percolate does not hold. sent13: the fact that the homegirl is not a metonymy and does percolate is not correct if it does not brazen Pagurus. sent14: the silverwork is not brave if the homegirl does brazen Pagurus and is a kind of a Aristotelian. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is non-Aristotelian thing that is a percolate is not true then that the homegirl is not Mycenaean hold. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it does not brazen Pagurus and it is a kind of a percolate is incorrect. sent17: the homegirl is a Vogul. sent18: the broodmare is not a kind of a slop if the log does not override Bunyan and it does not right. sent19: the silverwork is a brave. sent20: that the fact that the felloe is not a brave but it is a bilingual is true is not right if it does not brazen felloe. sent21: something is not a Aristotelian if it is not a brave.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homegirl does brazen Pagurus.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the homegirl does brazen Pagurus and it is a Aristotelian.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the silverwork is not a brave.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the homegirl does not brazen Pagurus.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the homegirl is not a metonymy but it percolates is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a metonymy and it is a percolate is not right.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the dictostylium is Mycenaean hold.
sent21 -> int7: the homegirl is not a kind of a Aristotelian if it is not a brave.; sent10 & sent1 -> int8: the log does not override Bunyan and does not right.; sent18 & int8 -> int9: the broodmare is not a slop.; sent12 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the silverwork is a metonymy that is not a kind of a percolate is not true.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it is a metonymy that does not percolate is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the dictostylium is Mycenaean. ; $context$ = sent1: the log is not a Cairo. sent2: that the dictostylium is both not Mycenaean and Aristotelian is incorrect if it does not brazen Pagurus. sent3: the dictostylium is not Mycenaean if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a metonymy and it does percolate is not right. sent4: the dictostylium is Aristotelian. sent5: there exists something such that it is both not a metonymy and a percolate. sent6: the homegirl is a Aristotelian. sent7: if something is a metonymy then the homegirl is not Mycenaean. sent8: the bubbler is a kind of a brave. sent9: the dictostylium is not Mycenaean if something does not percolate. sent10: the fact that if the log is not the Cairo then the log does not override Bunyan and is not a right is true. sent11: the homegirl is not Mycenaean if the dictostylium is a kind of a metonymy and it brazens Pagurus. sent12: if the broodmare is not a slop then that the silverwork is a kind of a metonymy but it is not a kind of a percolate does not hold. sent13: the fact that the homegirl is not a metonymy and does percolate is not correct if it does not brazen Pagurus. sent14: the silverwork is not brave if the homegirl does brazen Pagurus and is a kind of a Aristotelian. sent15: if there exists something such that that it is non-Aristotelian thing that is a percolate is not true then that the homegirl is not Mycenaean hold. sent16: there exists something such that the fact that it does not brazen Pagurus and it is a kind of a percolate is incorrect. sent17: the homegirl is a Vogul. sent18: the broodmare is not a kind of a slop if the log does not override Bunyan and it does not right. sent19: the silverwork is a brave. sent20: that the fact that the felloe is not a brave but it is a bilingual is true is not right if it does not brazen felloe. sent21: something is not a Aristotelian if it is not a brave. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the homegirl does brazen Pagurus.; assump1 & sent6 -> int1: the homegirl does brazen Pagurus and it is a Aristotelian.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the silverwork is not a brave.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the homegirl does not brazen Pagurus.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: that the homegirl is not a metonymy but it percolates is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a metonymy and it is a percolate is not right.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__