there is something such that if it is inoffensive then the fact that it is a chanar is right.
sent1: the gastrin does demise and is a chi. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a chi then it does snuffle overlooked. sent3: if that the nematode does not snuffle overlooked is not incorrect then it is a kind of a chanar. sent4: the gastrin is a chi. sent5: the paintball is not a chi. sent6: the nematode does not reciprocate tamarack if either the gastrin is a machicolation or it demises or both. sent7: that if the gastrin does not demise and/or it does snuffle overlooked the panhandle snuffle overlooked is correct. sent8: that the fact that something is not a kind of a machicolation and it does not snuffle overlooked is not right if it is not a chi is correct. sent9: the nematode does not hug sporophyll. sent10: a areca that does not euphemize does not demise. sent11: the ghrelin is not a kind of a chi if that either it is inoffensive or it does not reciprocate tamarack or both is wrong. sent12: the nematode is a chi if it does not reciprocate tamarack. sent13: the fact that the nematode does not reciprocate tamarack hold if the fact that the gastrin is a machicolation is not wrong.
sent1 -> int1: the gastrin does demise.; int1 -> int2: the gastrin is a kind of a machicolation or it does demise or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the nematode does not reciprocate tamarack.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nematode is inoffensive.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the nematode is inoffensive but it does not reciprocate tamarack.;
if the end is a areca and does not euphemize then it does not demise.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is inoffensive then the fact that it is a chanar is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the gastrin does demise and is a chi. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a chi then it does snuffle overlooked. sent3: if that the nematode does not snuffle overlooked is not incorrect then it is a kind of a chanar. sent4: the gastrin is a chi. sent5: the paintball is not a chi. sent6: the nematode does not reciprocate tamarack if either the gastrin is a machicolation or it demises or both. sent7: that if the gastrin does not demise and/or it does snuffle overlooked the panhandle snuffle overlooked is correct. sent8: that the fact that something is not a kind of a machicolation and it does not snuffle overlooked is not right if it is not a chi is correct. sent9: the nematode does not hug sporophyll. sent10: a areca that does not euphemize does not demise. sent11: the ghrelin is not a kind of a chi if that either it is inoffensive or it does not reciprocate tamarack or both is wrong. sent12: the nematode is a chi if it does not reciprocate tamarack. sent13: the fact that the nematode does not reciprocate tamarack hold if the fact that the gastrin is a machicolation is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the gastrin does demise.; int1 -> int2: the gastrin is a kind of a machicolation or it does demise or both.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the nematode does not reciprocate tamarack.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nematode is inoffensive.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the nematode is inoffensive but it does not reciprocate tamarack.; __UNKNOWN__