that both the navigationalness and the passage occurs is wrong.
sent1: that the beggaring HMO occurs brings about the piecing convenience. sent2: the tertianness occurs. sent3: if the Gibraltarian occurs the arachnoid occurs. sent4: the footing does not occur and/or the beggaring HMO occurs. sent5: the uterineness happens. sent6: that the uterineness happens triggers that the chuckling does not occur and the endocentricness does not occur. sent7: if either the footing does not occur or the beggaring HMO occurs or both then the piecing convenience occurs. sent8: the guard happens. sent9: if that the arachnoidness happens is right the navigationalness occurs. sent10: that both the passage and the counter happens is caused by that the chuckling does not occur. sent11: the fact that the piecing convenience does not occur is not wrong if the mutagenicness occurs and the guarding occurs. sent12: the boasting happens or the Ecuadorian happens or both. sent13: that the Gibraltarian occurs is brought about by the non-mutagenicness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the mutagenicness happens hold.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the mutagenicness happens and the guard occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the piecing convenience does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the piecing convenience happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the mutagenicness does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the Gibraltarian happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the arachnoidness happens.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the navigationalness occurs.; sent6 & sent5 -> int9: that the chuckling does not occur and the endocentricness does not occur is true.; int9 -> int10: the chuckling does not occur.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: both the passage and the countering happens.; int11 -> int12: the passage occurs.; int8 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that both the navigationalness and the passage happens is incorrect.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that both the navigationalness and the passage occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the beggaring HMO occurs brings about the piecing convenience. sent2: the tertianness occurs. sent3: if the Gibraltarian occurs the arachnoid occurs. sent4: the footing does not occur and/or the beggaring HMO occurs. sent5: the uterineness happens. sent6: that the uterineness happens triggers that the chuckling does not occur and the endocentricness does not occur. sent7: if either the footing does not occur or the beggaring HMO occurs or both then the piecing convenience occurs. sent8: the guard happens. sent9: if that the arachnoidness happens is right the navigationalness occurs. sent10: that both the passage and the counter happens is caused by that the chuckling does not occur. sent11: the fact that the piecing convenience does not occur is not wrong if the mutagenicness occurs and the guarding occurs. sent12: the boasting happens or the Ecuadorian happens or both. sent13: that the Gibraltarian occurs is brought about by the non-mutagenicness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the mutagenicness happens hold.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the mutagenicness happens and the guard occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the piecing convenience does not occur.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the piecing convenience happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the mutagenicness does not occur.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the Gibraltarian happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the arachnoidness happens.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the navigationalness occurs.; sent6 & sent5 -> int9: that the chuckling does not occur and the endocentricness does not occur is true.; int9 -> int10: the chuckling does not occur.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: both the passage and the countering happens.; int11 -> int12: the passage occurs.; int8 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__