that if the freesia does unpick paleobiology then the sovereign is a sustenance and/or it is not a kind of a binary is incorrect.
sent1: that the sycamore is hotbed and is a fivepence is not right if the freesia unpicks paleobiology. sent2: if the patroness does furlough Arius then the iridium is proximate. sent3: if that the sycamore is not hotbed but it is a fivepence is incorrect then the patroness does furlough Arius. sent4: if the freesia unpicks paleobiology then the sovereign is a sustenance and/or it is a kind of a binary. sent5: something does not unpick paleobiology and does not debut Hubel if it does furlough Arius. sent6: if the sycamore is hotbed the patroness does furlough Arius. sent7: the sovereign is a kind of a sustenance and/or it is a binary. sent8: that the sycamore is hotbed and it is a fivepence is not correct. sent9: if the freesia unpicks paleobiology then that the sycamore is not hotbed but it is a fivepence does not hold. sent10: if the sewage is not a sustenance then it is not proximate and furloughs Arius. sent11: if the iridium is proximate the sovereign is a sustenance.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freesia does unpick paleobiology.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the sycamore is both not hotbed and a fivepence is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the patroness furloughs Arius.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the iridium is proximate.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the sovereign is a kind of a sustenance.; int4 -> int5: the sovereign is a kind of a sustenance or it is not a kind of a binary or both.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the sewage is a kind of a fivepence and/or it does not debut Hubel.
sent5 -> int6: if the sewage does furlough Arius it does not unpick paleobiology and does not debut Hubel.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the freesia does unpick paleobiology then the sovereign is a sustenance and/or it is not a kind of a binary is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the sycamore is hotbed and is a fivepence is not right if the freesia unpicks paleobiology. sent2: if the patroness does furlough Arius then the iridium is proximate. sent3: if that the sycamore is not hotbed but it is a fivepence is incorrect then the patroness does furlough Arius. sent4: if the freesia unpicks paleobiology then the sovereign is a sustenance and/or it is a kind of a binary. sent5: something does not unpick paleobiology and does not debut Hubel if it does furlough Arius. sent6: if the sycamore is hotbed the patroness does furlough Arius. sent7: the sovereign is a kind of a sustenance and/or it is a binary. sent8: that the sycamore is hotbed and it is a fivepence is not correct. sent9: if the freesia unpicks paleobiology then that the sycamore is not hotbed but it is a fivepence does not hold. sent10: if the sewage is not a sustenance then it is not proximate and furloughs Arius. sent11: if the iridium is proximate the sovereign is a sustenance. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freesia does unpick paleobiology.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: that the sycamore is both not hotbed and a fivepence is false.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the patroness furloughs Arius.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the iridium is proximate.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the sovereign is a kind of a sustenance.; int4 -> int5: the sovereign is a kind of a sustenance or it is not a kind of a binary or both.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__