the dyeing does not occur.
sent1: if the dwindling occurs and the onomatopoeicness happens the dyeing does not occur. sent2: the subdividing Litocranius occurs. sent3: that the forcelessness occurs prevents the non-environmentalness. sent4: that the spacing unison happens and the dunning see happens prevents the voyaging. sent5: the dyeing occurs if the germinating does not occur but the nonrandomness occurs. sent6: the dig occurs. sent7: the endoscopy occurs. sent8: that the germinating does not occur is caused by that both the non-explicitness and the non-miscibleness happens. sent9: the non-explicitness and the immiscibleness occurs. sent10: the randomness triggers that the chauvinisticness occurs and/or the culinariness occurs. sent11: if the sloth occurs then the take-in occurs. sent12: the fact that the pyloricness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: the dunning fringe happens. sent14: the retailing occurs. sent15: that both the explicitness and the non-miscibleness occurs prevents that the germinating occurs. sent16: if the opacity occurs the dwindling occurs. sent17: the dunning teetotaler happens and/or the impinging occurs. sent18: the humanisticness occurs. sent19: the gonioscopy happens and the non-invertibleness occurs. sent20: the fact that the pyrogenicness does not occur is right. sent21: if both the dig and the explicitness happens the dwindling does not occur. sent22: if the interpreting anthropophagy happens then the opacity happens. sent23: the onomatopoeicness occurs. sent24: the fact that not the onomatopoeicness but the miscibleness occurs is false if the fact that the endoscopy occurs is not incorrect. sent25: the interpreting anthropophagy happens if the chauvinisticness happens. sent26: the interpreting anthropophagy occurs if the culinariness happens. sent27: the fact that the explicitness does not occur is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonrandomness occurs.; sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the germinating does not occur.;
the fact that the dyeing happens is correct.
sent24 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that both the non-onomatopoeicness and the miscibleness happens does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the dyeing does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dwindling occurs and the onomatopoeicness happens the dyeing does not occur. sent2: the subdividing Litocranius occurs. sent3: that the forcelessness occurs prevents the non-environmentalness. sent4: that the spacing unison happens and the dunning see happens prevents the voyaging. sent5: the dyeing occurs if the germinating does not occur but the nonrandomness occurs. sent6: the dig occurs. sent7: the endoscopy occurs. sent8: that the germinating does not occur is caused by that both the non-explicitness and the non-miscibleness happens. sent9: the non-explicitness and the immiscibleness occurs. sent10: the randomness triggers that the chauvinisticness occurs and/or the culinariness occurs. sent11: if the sloth occurs then the take-in occurs. sent12: the fact that the pyloricness does not occur is not incorrect. sent13: the dunning fringe happens. sent14: the retailing occurs. sent15: that both the explicitness and the non-miscibleness occurs prevents that the germinating occurs. sent16: if the opacity occurs the dwindling occurs. sent17: the dunning teetotaler happens and/or the impinging occurs. sent18: the humanisticness occurs. sent19: the gonioscopy happens and the non-invertibleness occurs. sent20: the fact that the pyrogenicness does not occur is right. sent21: if both the dig and the explicitness happens the dwindling does not occur. sent22: if the interpreting anthropophagy happens then the opacity happens. sent23: the onomatopoeicness occurs. sent24: the fact that not the onomatopoeicness but the miscibleness occurs is false if the fact that the endoscopy occurs is not incorrect. sent25: the interpreting anthropophagy happens if the chauvinisticness happens. sent26: the interpreting anthropophagy occurs if the culinariness happens. sent27: the fact that the explicitness does not occur is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonrandomness occurs.; sent8 & sent9 -> int1: the germinating does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__