that either the touching occurs or the commutating reformatory happens or both does not hold.
sent1: if the outbreak does not occur the impatientness does not occur. sent2: if the electronicness does not occur the ruling does not occur. sent3: the outbreak does not occur if the rule but not the rivaling prude happens. sent4: the commutating reformatory occurs if the impatientness does not occur. sent5: the rule does not occur and the rivaling prude does not occur if the electronicness does not occur. sent6: if the apogamicness does not occur the commutating reformatory does not occur and the touch occurs. sent7: the death does not occur. sent8: the electronicness does not occur. sent9: that the ruling does not occur and the rivaling prude does not occur causes that the outbreak does not occur. sent10: the rule does not occur.
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the rule does not occur and the rivaling prude does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the outbreak does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the impatientness does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the commutating reformatory happens.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the unrenewableness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that either the touching occurs or the commutating reformatory happens or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the outbreak does not occur the impatientness does not occur. sent2: if the electronicness does not occur the ruling does not occur. sent3: the outbreak does not occur if the rule but not the rivaling prude happens. sent4: the commutating reformatory occurs if the impatientness does not occur. sent5: the rule does not occur and the rivaling prude does not occur if the electronicness does not occur. sent6: if the apogamicness does not occur the commutating reformatory does not occur and the touch occurs. sent7: the death does not occur. sent8: the electronicness does not occur. sent9: that the ruling does not occur and the rivaling prude does not occur causes that the outbreak does not occur. sent10: the rule does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent8 -> int1: the rule does not occur and the rivaling prude does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the outbreak does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the impatientness does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the commutating reformatory happens.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__