the handbow does counterweight squirter.
sent1: the janissary is a publication. sent2: if something is a modern then that it is both not a publication and a Christianization is incorrect. sent3: something is a modern. sent4: the effigy is a publication. sent5: the fact that the effigy is both topographical and intramolecular is not false if it is not a balmoral. sent6: the Anasazi is topographical and it does busy. sent7: the effigy is not a kind of a balmoral. sent8: the effigy is topographical and it is a modern. sent9: the effigy is topographical. sent10: something is a debater and it does sheathe lymphadenopathy if it is not a kind of a Christianization. sent11: something is a Christianization. sent12: the bladderwort is a kind of a modern. sent13: the fact that the squirter does transfer Pelham and is not sexual is incorrect. sent14: the fact that the handbow is not topographical is not wrong. sent15: if that something is both not a publication and a Christianization is false it does not counterweight squirter. sent16: the Pelham is a Christianization and episcopal. sent17: the handbow is a orthogonality. sent18: if something is a Christianization and it is a modern then the handbow counterweights squirter. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it counterweights squirter is correct. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it transfers Pelham and it is not sexual is not true the effigy revenges. sent21: if something is a kind of a Christianization and it is a kind of a publication it does not counterweight squirter.
sent8 -> int1: the effigy is a modern.;
the handbow does not counterweight squirter.
sent15 -> int2: the handbow does not counterweight squirter if that it is both not a publication and a Christianization is wrong.; sent2 -> int3: if the handbow is a kind of a modern then the fact that it is not a publication and it is a Christianization is incorrect.; sent13 -> int4: there exists something such that that it does transfer Pelham and is not sexual is not true.; int4 & sent20 -> int5: the effigy does revenge.; sent5 & sent7 -> int6: the effigy is topographical and it is intramolecular.; int6 -> int7: the effigy is topographical.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the effigy does revenge and it is topographical.; int8 -> int9: something does revenge and is topographical.;
$hypothesis$ = the handbow does counterweight squirter. ; $context$ = sent1: the janissary is a publication. sent2: if something is a modern then that it is both not a publication and a Christianization is incorrect. sent3: something is a modern. sent4: the effigy is a publication. sent5: the fact that the effigy is both topographical and intramolecular is not false if it is not a balmoral. sent6: the Anasazi is topographical and it does busy. sent7: the effigy is not a kind of a balmoral. sent8: the effigy is topographical and it is a modern. sent9: the effigy is topographical. sent10: something is a debater and it does sheathe lymphadenopathy if it is not a kind of a Christianization. sent11: something is a Christianization. sent12: the bladderwort is a kind of a modern. sent13: the fact that the squirter does transfer Pelham and is not sexual is incorrect. sent14: the fact that the handbow is not topographical is not wrong. sent15: if that something is both not a publication and a Christianization is false it does not counterweight squirter. sent16: the Pelham is a Christianization and episcopal. sent17: the handbow is a orthogonality. sent18: if something is a Christianization and it is a modern then the handbow counterweights squirter. sent19: there is something such that the fact that it counterweights squirter is correct. sent20: if there is something such that the fact that it transfers Pelham and it is not sexual is not true the effigy revenges. sent21: if something is a kind of a Christianization and it is a kind of a publication it does not counterweight squirter. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the effigy is a modern.; __UNKNOWN__