the fact that the impeding enactment does not occur and the commemorativeness does not occur is false.
sent1: if the stemlessness does not occur then the impeding muchness occurs and the chancroidalness does not occur. sent2: if the porterage does not occur then the fact that the impeding enactment does not occur and the commemorative does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the perseverating propositus happens is prevented by the incompetentness or that the perseverating propositus does not occur or both. sent4: if the impeding precursor does not occur then the fact that the shellfire happens and the perseverating workaholic happens does not hold. sent5: the show causes that the non-competentness and the afloatness happens. sent6: the altostratus does not occur. sent7: the commemorativeness is prevented by that the impeding 10000 occurs and the perseverating propositus does not occur. sent8: that the impeding precursor happens is prevented by that the bust does not occur and the taxonomicness does not occur. sent9: that the commemorative happens and the impeding enactment happens is triggered by that the perseverating propositus does not occur. sent10: that the magnification does not occur causes that the impeding 10000 happens but the perseverating propositus does not occur. sent11: that the porterage but not the impeding 10000 occurs results in that the impeding Paradisaeidae does not occur. sent12: the porterage happens but the impeding 10000 does not occur if that the impeding enactment occurs is right. sent13: that both the impeding muchness and the jitterbug occurs prevents that the product happens. sent14: if that the shellfire occurs and the perseverating workaholic occurs is not true then the magnification does not occur. sent15: the impeding enactment does not occur and the porterage does not occur if the fact that the competentness does not occur is right. sent16: if the porterage does not occur that the impeding enactment occurs and the commemorativeness does not occur is not correct. sent17: if the product does not occur the bust does not occur and the taxonomicness does not occur. sent18: if the porterage occurs the impeding 10000 occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the porterage happens hold.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the impeding 10000 occurs.;
the impeding enactment does not occur and the commemorativeness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the impeding enactment does not occur and the commemorativeness does not occur is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stemlessness does not occur then the impeding muchness occurs and the chancroidalness does not occur. sent2: if the porterage does not occur then the fact that the impeding enactment does not occur and the commemorative does not occur is wrong. sent3: that the perseverating propositus happens is prevented by the incompetentness or that the perseverating propositus does not occur or both. sent4: if the impeding precursor does not occur then the fact that the shellfire happens and the perseverating workaholic happens does not hold. sent5: the show causes that the non-competentness and the afloatness happens. sent6: the altostratus does not occur. sent7: the commemorativeness is prevented by that the impeding 10000 occurs and the perseverating propositus does not occur. sent8: that the impeding precursor happens is prevented by that the bust does not occur and the taxonomicness does not occur. sent9: that the commemorative happens and the impeding enactment happens is triggered by that the perseverating propositus does not occur. sent10: that the magnification does not occur causes that the impeding 10000 happens but the perseverating propositus does not occur. sent11: that the porterage but not the impeding 10000 occurs results in that the impeding Paradisaeidae does not occur. sent12: the porterage happens but the impeding 10000 does not occur if that the impeding enactment occurs is right. sent13: that both the impeding muchness and the jitterbug occurs prevents that the product happens. sent14: if that the shellfire occurs and the perseverating workaholic occurs is not true then the magnification does not occur. sent15: the impeding enactment does not occur and the porterage does not occur if the fact that the competentness does not occur is right. sent16: if the porterage does not occur that the impeding enactment occurs and the commemorativeness does not occur is not correct. sent17: if the product does not occur the bust does not occur and the taxonomicness does not occur. sent18: if the porterage occurs the impeding 10000 occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the porterage happens hold.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the impeding 10000 occurs.; __UNKNOWN__