the predator is an encounter.
sent1: the flashboard is not wifely if the weakfish is a proto-oncogene that does mince. sent2: the fact that that something minces but it is not a kind of a proto-oncogene hold is not correct if it does firebomb dronabinol. sent3: the bogy does not walk sphincter and it does not firebomb RV if that the weakfish is a fardel is right. sent4: if the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol then the fact that the weakfish is not wifely but it is Caroline is not correct. sent5: that the flashboard is not a proto-oncogene and it is not an encounter is not correct if that the predator is not Caroline is not incorrect. sent6: the predator is a proto-oncogene. sent7: that the weakfish is non-wifely but it is Caroline does not hold. sent8: the bogy does not encounter. sent9: if the flashboard is a kind of a proto-oncogene and does mince then the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol. sent10: that the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol but it is a kind of a proto-oncogene is not true. sent11: if something does walk sphincter then it is Caroline. sent12: if something is Caroline and is wifely that it does not firebomb dronabinol is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the flashboard is a kind of a proto-oncogene hold. sent14: if the weakfish is a kind of a mince and it is wifely the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol. sent15: the fact that the flashboard is not a mince and does firebomb dronabinol is not right. sent16: the weakfish is a fardel. sent17: if the weakfish is Caroline the predator does not encounter. sent18: that the weakfish is not wifely and it is not Caroline is not true if the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol. sent19: the predator does not encounter if that the weakfish is not wifely and not Caroline does not hold. sent20: the predator does walk sphincter if the bogy does not walk sphincter and it does not firebomb RV. sent21: that if that the flashboard is wifely is not false the predator is wifely is correct. sent22: the flashboard does mince. sent23: if the fact that the weakfish is not a kind of an encounter is right then the fact that the predator is both Caroline and not wifely does not hold. sent24: the fact that something is not a mince and/or it is not a kind of a proto-oncogene is not wrong if it does not firebomb dronabinol.
sent13 & sent22 -> int1: the flashboard is a proto-oncogene that minces.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the weakfish is non-wifely thing that is not Caroline is wrong.; sent19 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the predator is an encounter.
sent24 -> int4: if the predator does not firebomb dronabinol it is not a mince and/or it is not a proto-oncogene.; sent12 -> int5: the predator does not firebomb dronabinol if it is both Caroline and wifely.; sent11 -> int6: the predator is Caroline if that it walks sphincter hold.; sent3 & sent16 -> int7: the bogy does not walk sphincter and it does not firebomb RV.; sent20 & int7 -> int8: the predator walks sphincter.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the predator is Caroline.;
$hypothesis$ = the predator is an encounter. ; $context$ = sent1: the flashboard is not wifely if the weakfish is a proto-oncogene that does mince. sent2: the fact that that something minces but it is not a kind of a proto-oncogene hold is not correct if it does firebomb dronabinol. sent3: the bogy does not walk sphincter and it does not firebomb RV if that the weakfish is a fardel is right. sent4: if the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol then the fact that the weakfish is not wifely but it is Caroline is not correct. sent5: that the flashboard is not a proto-oncogene and it is not an encounter is not correct if that the predator is not Caroline is not incorrect. sent6: the predator is a proto-oncogene. sent7: that the weakfish is non-wifely but it is Caroline does not hold. sent8: the bogy does not encounter. sent9: if the flashboard is a kind of a proto-oncogene and does mince then the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol. sent10: that the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol but it is a kind of a proto-oncogene is not true. sent11: if something does walk sphincter then it is Caroline. sent12: if something is Caroline and is wifely that it does not firebomb dronabinol is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the flashboard is a kind of a proto-oncogene hold. sent14: if the weakfish is a kind of a mince and it is wifely the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol. sent15: the fact that the flashboard is not a mince and does firebomb dronabinol is not right. sent16: the weakfish is a fardel. sent17: if the weakfish is Caroline the predator does not encounter. sent18: that the weakfish is not wifely and it is not Caroline is not true if the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol. sent19: the predator does not encounter if that the weakfish is not wifely and not Caroline does not hold. sent20: the predator does walk sphincter if the bogy does not walk sphincter and it does not firebomb RV. sent21: that if that the flashboard is wifely is not false the predator is wifely is correct. sent22: the flashboard does mince. sent23: if the fact that the weakfish is not a kind of an encounter is right then the fact that the predator is both Caroline and not wifely does not hold. sent24: the fact that something is not a mince and/or it is not a kind of a proto-oncogene is not wrong if it does not firebomb dronabinol. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent22 -> int1: the flashboard is a proto-oncogene that minces.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: the bogy does not firebomb dronabinol.; sent18 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the weakfish is non-wifely thing that is not Caroline is wrong.; sent19 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__