there is something such that if it either is unsensational or manoeuvers or both it is not a sequel.
sent1: if the tetrasaccharide is a palpebration then it does not retard. sent2: there is something such that if it is either not non-invertible or not non-afloat or both then the fact that it is not minty is correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is breathless and/or it slices Rothko then it is not heterozygous. sent4: if something is unsensational then it is not a kind of a sequel. sent5: if something is pentatonic and/or it is unnoticeable it does not edge. sent6: there is something such that if it is unsensational it is not a sequel. sent7: there is something such that if it honors whip-snake it is not a sequela. sent8: if the story is a kind of a Adonic and/or it is a palpebration it is a boo. sent9: there is something such that if it overcomes or is albuminuric or both that it is not a kind of a asana is not incorrect. sent10: that the tetrasaccharide is not a sequel is not false if it is unsensational. sent11: something is a sequel if it is unsensational and/or manoeuvers. sent12: there is something such that if it is monocotyledonous then the fact that it is not impressionable hold. sent13: that there exists something such that if it is unsensational and/or does manoeuver it is a sequel is correct. sent14: the fact that the tetrasaccharide is a sequel is not incorrect if it either is unsensational or does manoeuver or both.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it either is unsensational or manoeuvers or both it is not a sequel. ; $context$ = sent1: if the tetrasaccharide is a palpebration then it does not retard. sent2: there is something such that if it is either not non-invertible or not non-afloat or both then the fact that it is not minty is correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is breathless and/or it slices Rothko then it is not heterozygous. sent4: if something is unsensational then it is not a kind of a sequel. sent5: if something is pentatonic and/or it is unnoticeable it does not edge. sent6: there is something such that if it is unsensational it is not a sequel. sent7: there is something such that if it honors whip-snake it is not a sequela. sent8: if the story is a kind of a Adonic and/or it is a palpebration it is a boo. sent9: there is something such that if it overcomes or is albuminuric or both that it is not a kind of a asana is not incorrect. sent10: that the tetrasaccharide is not a sequel is not false if it is unsensational. sent11: something is a sequel if it is unsensational and/or manoeuvers. sent12: there is something such that if it is monocotyledonous then the fact that it is not impressionable hold. sent13: that there exists something such that if it is unsensational and/or does manoeuver it is a sequel is correct. sent14: the fact that the tetrasaccharide is a sequel is not incorrect if it either is unsensational or does manoeuver or both. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__