the Tasmanianness does not occur and the derailing cytophotometry does not occur.
sent1: the excising homeowner occurs. sent2: the hermeneuticsness is triggered by that the resuscitation does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the Tasmanianness but not the CPR happens does not hold the Tasmanianness does not occur. sent4: if the Catalan does not occur the actualizing happens and the backing occurs. sent5: the Catalan does not occur. sent6: the cramping does not occur and the prejudging does not occur. sent7: the snub happens. sent8: the differential does not occur. sent9: the performing does not occur. sent10: the fact that the Tasmanianness but not the CPR occurs is wrong if the fact that the exacerbation occurs is correct. sent11: the foaling occurs. sent12: that the resale does not occur is true. sent13: if the cramp does not occur the exacerbation does not occur but the modality happens. sent14: if the incomprehensibleness does not occur the fact that the rig does not occur and the derailing walk-in does not occur is wrong. sent15: the dint does not occur. sent16: the avascularness does not occur and the luging does not occur. sent17: the fact that the Tasmanianness does not occur and the derailing cytophotometry does not occur is incorrect if the CPR does not occur. sent18: that the Tasmanianness but not the derailing cytophotometry occurs is not true if the CPR does not occur. sent19: if the exacerbation does not occur and the glazing does not occur the CPR does not occur. sent20: if the glaze and the excising homeowner happens then the backed does not occur. sent21: that the polarness does not occur and the dint does not occur is not right if the fact that the stigmatizing XY does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the fact that the perplexing sourball does not occur but the phlegminess occurs is wrong if the excising Puffinus does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glaze happens.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the glazing and the excising homeowner happens.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: that the backed does not occur is not wrong.; sent4 & sent5 -> int3: the actualizing and the backed happens.; int3 -> int4: the backed occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the glaze occurs is not right.; sent6 -> int7: the cramp does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the exacerbation does not occur and the modality occurs.; int8 -> int9: the exacerbation does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the exacerbation does not occur and the glaze does not occur.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the CPR does not occur.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the Tasmanianness does not occur and the derailing cytophotometry does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the Tasmanianness does not occur and the derailing cytophotometry does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the excising homeowner occurs. sent2: the hermeneuticsness is triggered by that the resuscitation does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the Tasmanianness but not the CPR happens does not hold the Tasmanianness does not occur. sent4: if the Catalan does not occur the actualizing happens and the backing occurs. sent5: the Catalan does not occur. sent6: the cramping does not occur and the prejudging does not occur. sent7: the snub happens. sent8: the differential does not occur. sent9: the performing does not occur. sent10: the fact that the Tasmanianness but not the CPR occurs is wrong if the fact that the exacerbation occurs is correct. sent11: the foaling occurs. sent12: that the resale does not occur is true. sent13: if the cramp does not occur the exacerbation does not occur but the modality happens. sent14: if the incomprehensibleness does not occur the fact that the rig does not occur and the derailing walk-in does not occur is wrong. sent15: the dint does not occur. sent16: the avascularness does not occur and the luging does not occur. sent17: the fact that the Tasmanianness does not occur and the derailing cytophotometry does not occur is incorrect if the CPR does not occur. sent18: that the Tasmanianness but not the derailing cytophotometry occurs is not true if the CPR does not occur. sent19: if the exacerbation does not occur and the glazing does not occur the CPR does not occur. sent20: if the glaze and the excising homeowner happens then the backed does not occur. sent21: that the polarness does not occur and the dint does not occur is not right if the fact that the stigmatizing XY does not occur is not incorrect. sent22: the fact that the perplexing sourball does not occur but the phlegminess occurs is wrong if the excising Puffinus does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glaze happens.; assump1 & sent1 -> int1: the glazing and the excising homeowner happens.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: that the backed does not occur is not wrong.; sent4 & sent5 -> int3: the actualizing and the backed happens.; int3 -> int4: the backed occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the glaze occurs is not right.; sent6 -> int7: the cramp does not occur.; sent13 & int7 -> int8: the exacerbation does not occur and the modality occurs.; int8 -> int9: the exacerbation does not occur.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the exacerbation does not occur and the glaze does not occur.; int10 & sent19 -> int11: the CPR does not occur.; int11 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__