not the tagging lying but the moot happens.
sent1: the repulsion occurs and the perigonalness happens. sent2: if the schottische occurs then that either the tagging lying does not occur or the hyaloplasmicness occurs or both is false. sent3: the repulsion happens if the downhill does not occur. sent4: that the moot does not occur is wrong. sent5: the cabaret does not occur but the stewing happens. sent6: that the gauging deism happens and the blend occurs is not right if the invention does not occur. sent7: that the overawing baccalaureate occurs is prevented by that the tagging simplicity and the gauging cresol happens. sent8: that both the negating wilt and the configurationalness occurs prevents the perigonalness. sent9: if the negating wilt does not occur then the fact that the overawing dotted happens and the hyaloplasmicness happens is incorrect. sent10: both the tagging dished and the arborolatry happens. sent11: the negating wilt and the tagging pervaporation occurs if the configurationalness does not occur. sent12: the imperishableness does not occur if the configurationalness happens and the perigonalness happens. sent13: if the fact that both the overawing dotted and the hyaloplasmicness happens does not hold the tagging lying does not occur. sent14: if the hyaloplasmicness does not occur then the tagging lying does not occur. sent15: the repulsion occurs. sent16: if that either the tagging lying does not occur or the hyaloplasmicness happens or both is not correct then the overawing dotted does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the overawing MP and the overawing vine happens is incorrect. sent18: that the configurationalness and the perigonalness occurs is brought about by that the overawing dotted does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the negating wilt does not occur is not correct.; sent1 -> int1: the perigonalness occurs.;
the non-imperishableness and the easement occurs.
$hypothesis$ = not the tagging lying but the moot happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the repulsion occurs and the perigonalness happens. sent2: if the schottische occurs then that either the tagging lying does not occur or the hyaloplasmicness occurs or both is false. sent3: the repulsion happens if the downhill does not occur. sent4: that the moot does not occur is wrong. sent5: the cabaret does not occur but the stewing happens. sent6: that the gauging deism happens and the blend occurs is not right if the invention does not occur. sent7: that the overawing baccalaureate occurs is prevented by that the tagging simplicity and the gauging cresol happens. sent8: that both the negating wilt and the configurationalness occurs prevents the perigonalness. sent9: if the negating wilt does not occur then the fact that the overawing dotted happens and the hyaloplasmicness happens is incorrect. sent10: both the tagging dished and the arborolatry happens. sent11: the negating wilt and the tagging pervaporation occurs if the configurationalness does not occur. sent12: the imperishableness does not occur if the configurationalness happens and the perigonalness happens. sent13: if the fact that both the overawing dotted and the hyaloplasmicness happens does not hold the tagging lying does not occur. sent14: if the hyaloplasmicness does not occur then the tagging lying does not occur. sent15: the repulsion occurs. sent16: if that either the tagging lying does not occur or the hyaloplasmicness happens or both is not correct then the overawing dotted does not occur. sent17: the fact that both the overawing MP and the overawing vine happens is incorrect. sent18: that the configurationalness and the perigonalness occurs is brought about by that the overawing dotted does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the negating wilt does not occur is not correct.; sent1 -> int1: the perigonalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__