the ibis repines phenolphthalein.
sent1: if something is philological then the fact that it is not a salat or it confuses Ruritanian or both is incorrect. sent2: everything does not confuse Ruritanian. sent3: the ibis does not confuse Ruritanian and does not repine phenolphthalein if the stereo is philological. sent4: if something is not Mosaic that it is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is wrong. sent5: the polyp does result. sent6: the ibis is not a one-tenth if there is something such that either it is a kind of a salat or it is not a kind of a result or both. sent7: the ibis does not confuse Ruritanian if the stereo is philological. sent8: the migrator does not front Vouvray and is not a Nammu if it does not result. sent9: the polyp is not a kind of a salat if there exists something such that it does not front Vouvray and is a kind of a Nammu. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Mosaic and does not confuse asperity is not right the polyp is not Mosaic. sent11: if the migrator is a result then the stereo is philological. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Mosaic and does not confuse asperity does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the polyp is not a salat and/or it confuses Ruritanian is false then the migrator is not a salat. sent14: the polyp is not a salat if something that does not front Vouvray is not a kind of a Nammu. sent15: if the polyp is not a kind of a Mosaic then that it is not a by-line and it is a one-tenth does not hold. sent16: the ibis does repine phenolphthalein if the migrator does repine phenolphthalein. sent17: the migrator is not a salat. sent18: if that something is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is not true it is a salat. sent19: that the stereo is not a Nammu hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the migrator does not result.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the migrator does not front Vouvray and it is not a kind of a Nammu.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not front Vouvray and is not a Nammu.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the polyp is not a salat.; sent18 -> int4: the polyp is a salat if the fact that it is not a by-line and is not a one-tenth is not correct.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the polyp is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is incorrect if it is non-Mosaic.; sent12 & sent10 -> int6: the polyp is not Mosaic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the polyp is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is not true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the polyp is a salat.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the migrator is a result.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the stereo is philological.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the ibis does not confuse Ruritanian and does not repine phenolphthalein.; int12 -> hypothesis;
the ibis is not a one-tenth.
sent2 -> int13: the polyp does not confuse Ruritanian.;
$hypothesis$ = the ibis repines phenolphthalein. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is philological then the fact that it is not a salat or it confuses Ruritanian or both is incorrect. sent2: everything does not confuse Ruritanian. sent3: the ibis does not confuse Ruritanian and does not repine phenolphthalein if the stereo is philological. sent4: if something is not Mosaic that it is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is wrong. sent5: the polyp does result. sent6: the ibis is not a one-tenth if there is something such that either it is a kind of a salat or it is not a kind of a result or both. sent7: the ibis does not confuse Ruritanian if the stereo is philological. sent8: the migrator does not front Vouvray and is not a Nammu if it does not result. sent9: the polyp is not a kind of a salat if there exists something such that it does not front Vouvray and is a kind of a Nammu. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Mosaic and does not confuse asperity is not right the polyp is not Mosaic. sent11: if the migrator is a result then the stereo is philological. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Mosaic and does not confuse asperity does not hold. sent13: if the fact that the polyp is not a salat and/or it confuses Ruritanian is false then the migrator is not a salat. sent14: the polyp is not a salat if something that does not front Vouvray is not a kind of a Nammu. sent15: if the polyp is not a kind of a Mosaic then that it is not a by-line and it is a one-tenth does not hold. sent16: the ibis does repine phenolphthalein if the migrator does repine phenolphthalein. sent17: the migrator is not a salat. sent18: if that something is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is not true it is a salat. sent19: that the stereo is not a Nammu hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the migrator does not result.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the migrator does not front Vouvray and it is not a kind of a Nammu.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it does not front Vouvray and is not a Nammu.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the polyp is not a salat.; sent18 -> int4: the polyp is a salat if the fact that it is not a by-line and is not a one-tenth is not correct.; sent4 -> int5: the fact that the polyp is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is incorrect if it is non-Mosaic.; sent12 & sent10 -> int6: the polyp is not Mosaic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the polyp is not a by-line and it is not a one-tenth is not true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the polyp is a salat.; int3 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the migrator is a result.; int10 & sent11 -> int11: the stereo is philological.; int11 & sent3 -> int12: the ibis does not confuse Ruritanian and does not repine phenolphthalein.; int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__