the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia.
sent1: if there are anemographic things then the fact that the vandal does stigmatize photalgia and it does permit colophon is wrong. sent2: the vandal is paniculate. sent3: the fact that the oast either does boot adventurism or permits colophon or both is not incorrect. sent4: that the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia is true if there exists something such that the fact that it is anemographic and it is hormonal is not right. sent5: the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia if there is something such that it is non-hormonal. sent6: there exists something such that it does boot adventurism. sent7: the fact that the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia and boots adventurism is not true if the oast permits colophon. sent8: if the oast does permit colophon then the tideland is a moor. sent9: something is anemographic and it is hormonal. sent10: that the fact that the Triton is both not non-anemographic and hormonal is false is not false if there exists something such that it moors. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is one-piece and is a kind of a trapshooter is not true. sent12: the Triton is anemographic and it is hormonal if the tideland is not a trapshooter. sent13: if the fact that something does not stigmatize photalgia but it boots adventurism does not hold then it does stigmatize photalgia. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is anemographic and is a moor is not correct then the Triton does not boot adventurism. sent15: if the tideland boots adventurism then that the oast is a moor hold.
that the vandal does stigmatize photalgia is not wrong.
sent13 -> int1: the vandal does stigmatize photalgia if the fact that it does not stigmatize photalgia and does boot adventurism is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia. ; $context$ = sent1: if there are anemographic things then the fact that the vandal does stigmatize photalgia and it does permit colophon is wrong. sent2: the vandal is paniculate. sent3: the fact that the oast either does boot adventurism or permits colophon or both is not incorrect. sent4: that the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia is true if there exists something such that the fact that it is anemographic and it is hormonal is not right. sent5: the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia if there is something such that it is non-hormonal. sent6: there exists something such that it does boot adventurism. sent7: the fact that the vandal does not stigmatize photalgia and boots adventurism is not true if the oast permits colophon. sent8: if the oast does permit colophon then the tideland is a moor. sent9: something is anemographic and it is hormonal. sent10: that the fact that the Triton is both not non-anemographic and hormonal is false is not false if there exists something such that it moors. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it is one-piece and is a kind of a trapshooter is not true. sent12: the Triton is anemographic and it is hormonal if the tideland is not a trapshooter. sent13: if the fact that something does not stigmatize photalgia but it boots adventurism does not hold then it does stigmatize photalgia. sent14: if there exists something such that that it is anemographic and is a moor is not correct then the Triton does not boot adventurism. sent15: if the tideland boots adventurism then that the oast is a moor hold. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__