the fact that there exists something such that if it is anterograde then it does camouflage coastland is false.
sent1: if the fact that something detribalizes hula but it does not absorb is not correct then it does camouflage coastland. sent2: if something does absorb then it camouflages coastland. sent3: if the condensate detribalizes hula but it does not absorb it is anterograde. sent4: the condensate is not anterograde if it detribalizes hula and absorbs. sent5: the condensate is trochaic if it does camouflage coastland. sent6: that the condensate is not anterograde is not incorrect if it detribalizes hula and it does not absorb. sent7: the condensate is not a kind of a mid-calf if it absorbs and it is not a bedtime. sent8: that the condensate does detribalize hula and it absorbs is incorrect. sent9: that the condensate does not absorb is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the condensate does detribalize hula but it does not absorb.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the condensate is not anterograde.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the condensate is anterograde.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the condensate does detribalize hula and does not absorb is not true.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the condensate detribalizes hula but it does not absorb is not true then it camouflages coastland.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the condensate does camouflage coastland.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the condensate does camouflage coastland if it is anterograde.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is anterograde then it does camouflage coastland is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something detribalizes hula but it does not absorb is not correct then it does camouflage coastland. sent2: if something does absorb then it camouflages coastland. sent3: if the condensate detribalizes hula but it does not absorb it is anterograde. sent4: the condensate is not anterograde if it detribalizes hula and absorbs. sent5: the condensate is trochaic if it does camouflage coastland. sent6: that the condensate is not anterograde is not incorrect if it detribalizes hula and it does not absorb. sent7: the condensate is not a kind of a mid-calf if it absorbs and it is not a bedtime. sent8: that the condensate does detribalize hula and it absorbs is incorrect. sent9: that the condensate does not absorb is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the condensate does detribalize hula but it does not absorb.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the condensate is not anterograde.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the condensate is anterograde.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the condensate does detribalize hula and does not absorb is not true.; sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the condensate detribalizes hula but it does not absorb is not true then it camouflages coastland.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the condensate does camouflage coastland.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the condensate does camouflage coastland if it is anterograde.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__