the fact that the unpreventableness but not the believing occurs is not correct.
sent1: if that the broiling borough and the bail occurs is incorrect then the browsing does not occur. sent2: that both the broiling borough and the bail occurs is not correct. sent3: if the quarantining attorneyship does not occur then the fruition does not occur and the rh-negativeness does not occur. sent4: that the browsing does not occur is not incorrect if the bail does not occur. sent5: that the bailing happens yields that the unpreventableness but not the believing occurs. sent6: that the broiling borough or the browse or both occurs is triggered by that the fruition does not occur. sent7: the believing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unpreventableness occurs and the believing does not occur.; sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the browsing does not occur.;
the unpreventableness happens and the believing does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the unpreventableness but not the believing occurs is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the broiling borough and the bail occurs is incorrect then the browsing does not occur. sent2: that both the broiling borough and the bail occurs is not correct. sent3: if the quarantining attorneyship does not occur then the fruition does not occur and the rh-negativeness does not occur. sent4: that the browsing does not occur is not incorrect if the bail does not occur. sent5: that the bailing happens yields that the unpreventableness but not the believing occurs. sent6: that the broiling borough or the browse or both occurs is triggered by that the fruition does not occur. sent7: the believing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unpreventableness occurs and the believing does not occur.; sent1 & sent2 -> int1: the browsing does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__