the fact that the fact that that the langur is a topic but it does not ban annotation hold is not true is true.
sent1: the Nesselrode is undesirous if the fact that the climb suborns venom is not wrong. sent2: the climb is a waffle if the fact that it bans annotation and does not suborn venom is wrong. sent3: if the speculator is a kind of a cetacean then the compress is a definition. sent4: the compress does ban annotation if it is not undesirous. sent5: the fact that the climb suborns venom is not incorrect if that it does not ban annotation is true. sent6: the speculator is a kind of a definition and/or it is a kind of a cetacean. sent7: if the fact that the Nesselrode is not a preventive and is not a kind of a snatch is false then it is a preventive. sent8: if something does suborn venom then it is a topic and it does not ban annotation. sent9: if something is not a kind of a topic it is a caper and it is undesirous. sent10: the climb is uninstructive if the Nesselrode is a preventive. sent11: if that that something is not undesirous and it is not a caper is true is wrong it is not a definition. sent12: if something is a waffle that the speculator is a definition but it is not a waffle does not hold. sent13: if that something does not ban annotation and is not a kind of a topic does not hold that it is not undesirous is true. sent14: that the compress is not undesirous and not a caper is not true if the Nesselrode is undesirous. sent15: the compress is a definition if the speculator is a definition. sent16: that something is a kind of desirous thing that does not suborn venom does not hold if it is a caper. sent17: something is not cetacean and not a Eniwetok if it is uninstructive. sent18: if that the climb is not undesirous and it does not suborn venom is incorrect then the langur suborn venom. sent19: the fact that the langur is a topic but it does not ban annotation is not true if the climb does ban annotation. sent20: that something does ban annotation but it does not suborn venom is false if it is undesirous. sent21: if a non-cetacean thing is not a Eniwetok the fact that it is not a kind of a topic hold. sent22: the langur is a cetacean.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the climb does not ban annotation.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the climb suborns venom is right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the Nesselrode is undesirous is correct.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the compress is not undesirous and it is not a kind of a caper is not true.; sent11 -> int4: if that the compress is not undesirous and it is not a caper does not hold then it is not a kind of a definition.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the compress is not a definition is right.; sent6 & sent15 & sent3 -> int6: the compress is a definition.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the climb does ban annotation.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the speculator is a kind of a definition that is not a waffle is false.
sent20 -> int9: the fact that the climb bans annotation and does not suborn venom is not true if it is undesirous.; sent9 -> int10: if the climb is not a topic then it is a caper and it is undesirous.; sent21 -> int11: that if the climb is not a kind of a cetacean and it is not the Eniwetok the climb is not a topic hold.; sent17 -> int12: if the climb is uninstructive it is a kind of non-cetacean thing that is not a Eniwetok.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that that the langur is a topic but it does not ban annotation hold is not true is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the Nesselrode is undesirous if the fact that the climb suborns venom is not wrong. sent2: the climb is a waffle if the fact that it bans annotation and does not suborn venom is wrong. sent3: if the speculator is a kind of a cetacean then the compress is a definition. sent4: the compress does ban annotation if it is not undesirous. sent5: the fact that the climb suborns venom is not incorrect if that it does not ban annotation is true. sent6: the speculator is a kind of a definition and/or it is a kind of a cetacean. sent7: if the fact that the Nesselrode is not a preventive and is not a kind of a snatch is false then it is a preventive. sent8: if something does suborn venom then it is a topic and it does not ban annotation. sent9: if something is not a kind of a topic it is a caper and it is undesirous. sent10: the climb is uninstructive if the Nesselrode is a preventive. sent11: if that that something is not undesirous and it is not a caper is true is wrong it is not a definition. sent12: if something is a waffle that the speculator is a definition but it is not a waffle does not hold. sent13: if that something does not ban annotation and is not a kind of a topic does not hold that it is not undesirous is true. sent14: that the compress is not undesirous and not a caper is not true if the Nesselrode is undesirous. sent15: the compress is a definition if the speculator is a definition. sent16: that something is a kind of desirous thing that does not suborn venom does not hold if it is a caper. sent17: something is not cetacean and not a Eniwetok if it is uninstructive. sent18: if that the climb is not undesirous and it does not suborn venom is incorrect then the langur suborn venom. sent19: the fact that the langur is a topic but it does not ban annotation is not true if the climb does ban annotation. sent20: that something does ban annotation but it does not suborn venom is false if it is undesirous. sent21: if a non-cetacean thing is not a Eniwetok the fact that it is not a kind of a topic hold. sent22: the langur is a cetacean. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the climb does not ban annotation.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the climb suborns venom is right.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the Nesselrode is undesirous is correct.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the fact that the compress is not undesirous and it is not a kind of a caper is not true.; sent11 -> int4: if that the compress is not undesirous and it is not a caper does not hold then it is not a kind of a definition.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the compress is not a definition is right.; sent6 & sent15 & sent3 -> int6: the compress is a definition.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the climb does ban annotation.; int8 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__