there exists something such that if the fact that it does not carol letters and it is not a grabber does not hold then it is not lentic.
sent1: there is something such that if it does lurch paradigm then it is not a kind of a shad. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does not carol letters and it is not a grabber is not correct then it is lentic. sent3: there is something such that if it is a grabber then it is not lentic. sent4: if that something is not a Kwanzaa and it does not lurch Schwann is not right then it is not a Sitter. sent5: the dampener is not lentic if that it does not carol letters and it is not a grabber is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it is a hardliner then that it does not intend is right.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if that it is not a Kwanzaa and does not lurch Schwann is incorrect it is not a Sitter.
sent4 -> int1: if that the electroscope is not a Kwanzaa and it does not lurch Schwann is not true it is not a Sitter.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if the fact that it does not carol letters and it is not a grabber does not hold then it is not lentic. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it does lurch paradigm then it is not a kind of a shad. sent2: there exists something such that if that it does not carol letters and it is not a grabber is not correct then it is lentic. sent3: there is something such that if it is a grabber then it is not lentic. sent4: if that something is not a Kwanzaa and it does not lurch Schwann is not right then it is not a Sitter. sent5: the dampener is not lentic if that it does not carol letters and it is not a grabber is not right. sent6: there is something such that if it is a hardliner then that it does not intend is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__