the brain is not a squeegee.
sent1: the stick is a kind of a troll. sent2: that the Galatian does not sample Aphididae is correct. sent3: That the Aphididae does not sample Galatian is correct. sent4: if the fact that the Galatian is a squeegee but it is not a dazzling is wrong the brain is not a squeegee. sent5: the fact that the Galatian is a purulence but not pilosebaceous is incorrect if it does not sample Aphididae. sent6: the brain is a squeegee if that that the Galatian is a purulence but it is not pilosebaceous is true is incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does not exalt itineration and it is not a hybrid is false if it does not swamp constructiveness. sent8: that the Galatian is a squeegee and is a purulence is not correct if it does not sample Aphididae. sent9: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Bourse then the fact that the boot is handless and it yells is not right. sent10: if the brain does not squeegee then the fact that it is pilosebaceous and it does sample Aphididae does not hold. sent11: if the Galatian does not sample Aphididae then the fact that it is a kind of a squeegee that is not pilosebaceous is not true. sent12: something does not swamp constructiveness if the fact that either it exalts stick or it sounds or both is not true. sent13: the fact that the fact that the Galatian perceives brain and it samples Aphididae does not hold is true. sent14: if the stick does troll or it is a kind of a solvent or both then it is not spectroscopic. sent15: the bed is a Bourse if that the adrenergic does not exalt itineration and it is not a kind of a hybrid is incorrect. sent16: that the Galatian is a squeegee that does not dazzle is incorrect if the silencer does not sample Aphididae. sent17: if the stick is not spectroscopic then that either the adrenergic exalts stick or it does sound or both is false.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the Galatian is a purulence and is not pilosebaceous is incorrect.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the brain does not squeegee.
sent7 -> int2: if the adrenergic does not swamp constructiveness the fact that it does not exalt itineration and is not a hybrid does not hold.; sent12 -> int3: the adrenergic does not swamp constructiveness if the fact that either it exalts stick or it is a sound or both is not right.; sent1 -> int4: the stick is a troll and/or a solvent.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the stick is not spectroscopic.; sent17 & int5 -> int6: that either the adrenergic exalts stick or it sounds or both is false.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the adrenergic does not swamp constructiveness.; int2 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the adrenergic does not exalt itineration and it is not a kind of a hybrid is not true.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the bed is a kind of a Bourse.; int9 -> int10: something is a Bourse.; int10 & sent9 -> int11: that the boot is handless thing that does yell is false.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is a kind of handless thing that yells is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the brain is not a squeegee. ; $context$ = sent1: the stick is a kind of a troll. sent2: that the Galatian does not sample Aphididae is correct. sent3: That the Aphididae does not sample Galatian is correct. sent4: if the fact that the Galatian is a squeegee but it is not a dazzling is wrong the brain is not a squeegee. sent5: the fact that the Galatian is a purulence but not pilosebaceous is incorrect if it does not sample Aphididae. sent6: the brain is a squeegee if that that the Galatian is a purulence but it is not pilosebaceous is true is incorrect. sent7: the fact that something does not exalt itineration and it is not a hybrid is false if it does not swamp constructiveness. sent8: that the Galatian is a squeegee and is a purulence is not correct if it does not sample Aphididae. sent9: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Bourse then the fact that the boot is handless and it yells is not right. sent10: if the brain does not squeegee then the fact that it is pilosebaceous and it does sample Aphididae does not hold. sent11: if the Galatian does not sample Aphididae then the fact that it is a kind of a squeegee that is not pilosebaceous is not true. sent12: something does not swamp constructiveness if the fact that either it exalts stick or it sounds or both is not true. sent13: the fact that the fact that the Galatian perceives brain and it samples Aphididae does not hold is true. sent14: if the stick does troll or it is a kind of a solvent or both then it is not spectroscopic. sent15: the bed is a Bourse if that the adrenergic does not exalt itineration and it is not a kind of a hybrid is incorrect. sent16: that the Galatian is a squeegee that does not dazzle is incorrect if the silencer does not sample Aphididae. sent17: if the stick is not spectroscopic then that either the adrenergic exalts stick or it does sound or both is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: that the Galatian is a purulence and is not pilosebaceous is incorrect.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__