that the bayou does not adjoin ruminant and does not pray is not true.
sent1: the fact that the bayou does not adjoin Putrajaya and it is not sociolinguistics is false. sent2: something photographs jumpsuit if it is a kind of non-voltaic thing that does adjoin slot. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Parkinson and it does not emulsify therapy is not false the brigantine is not voltaic. sent4: the bayou is not a syphilitic. sent5: the bayou is not voltaic. sent6: if something that photographs jumpsuit does pray then it does not adjoin ruminant. sent7: that something does not remodel placement and it is not a ducat is not right if it does not adjoin ruminant. sent8: if the Hebrews adjoins ruminant then it does not adjoin blackhead. sent9: the bayou is a hoard. sent10: the ascendant is a Parkinson and does not emulsify therapy. sent11: The slot does adjoin bayou. sent12: the bayou does adjoin slot. sent13: something does not photograph jumpsuit if the fact that it is a kind of non-electoral thing that is not syphilitic does not hold. sent14: the jumpsuit photographs jumpsuit and it prays if the brigantine does not adjoin slot. sent15: the fact that something does not adjoin ruminant and does not pray is not right if it is not electoral. sent16: the bayou is not pilar but it is a kind of a coo.
sent13 -> int1: the bayou does not photograph jumpsuit if the fact that it is a kind of non-electoral thing that is not a syphilitic is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the bayou is not electoral and it is not syphilitic is true is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bayou does not photograph jumpsuit.; sent2 -> int3: the bayou does photograph jumpsuit if it is a kind of non-voltaic thing that does adjoin slot.; sent5 & sent12 -> int4: the bayou is not voltaic and adjoins slot.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bayou does photograph jumpsuit.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bayou is non-electoral thing that is not a syphilitic.; int7 -> int8: the bayou is non-electoral.; sent15 -> int9: that the bayou does not adjoin ruminant and does not pray is not true if it is not electoral.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the bayou does not adjoin ruminant and it does not pray.
sent10 -> int10: something is a Parkinson but it does not emulsify therapy.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the brigantine is not voltaic.;
$hypothesis$ = that the bayou does not adjoin ruminant and does not pray is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the bayou does not adjoin Putrajaya and it is not sociolinguistics is false. sent2: something photographs jumpsuit if it is a kind of non-voltaic thing that does adjoin slot. sent3: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Parkinson and it does not emulsify therapy is not false the brigantine is not voltaic. sent4: the bayou is not a syphilitic. sent5: the bayou is not voltaic. sent6: if something that photographs jumpsuit does pray then it does not adjoin ruminant. sent7: that something does not remodel placement and it is not a ducat is not right if it does not adjoin ruminant. sent8: if the Hebrews adjoins ruminant then it does not adjoin blackhead. sent9: the bayou is a hoard. sent10: the ascendant is a Parkinson and does not emulsify therapy. sent11: The slot does adjoin bayou. sent12: the bayou does adjoin slot. sent13: something does not photograph jumpsuit if the fact that it is a kind of non-electoral thing that is not syphilitic does not hold. sent14: the jumpsuit photographs jumpsuit and it prays if the brigantine does not adjoin slot. sent15: the fact that something does not adjoin ruminant and does not pray is not right if it is not electoral. sent16: the bayou is not pilar but it is a kind of a coo. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the bayou does not photograph jumpsuit if the fact that it is a kind of non-electoral thing that is not a syphilitic is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the fact that the bayou is not electoral and it is not syphilitic is true is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bayou does not photograph jumpsuit.; sent2 -> int3: the bayou does photograph jumpsuit if it is a kind of non-voltaic thing that does adjoin slot.; sent5 & sent12 -> int4: the bayou is not voltaic and adjoins slot.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bayou does photograph jumpsuit.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the bayou is non-electoral thing that is not a syphilitic.; int7 -> int8: the bayou is non-electoral.; sent15 -> int9: that the bayou does not adjoin ruminant and does not pray is not true if it is not electoral.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__