not the photostating sprouted but the megakaryocyticness occurs.
sent1: that the photostating sprouted does not occur but the megakaryocyticness occurs is caused by that the astrophysicalness does not occur. sent2: if the preposing Honshu occurs then the responsibleness occurs. sent3: that both the non-crosswiseness and the non-cyclothymicness occurs prevents that the Confucianness happens. sent4: that the preposing vandyke occurs is prevented by that both the recapturing and the astrophysicalness occurs. sent5: the astrophysicalness does not occur if the preposing vandyke occurs. sent6: if the cyclothymicness happens then the Confucian occurs. sent7: if the cyclothymicness does not occur the immunosuppressiveness does not occur and the Confucianness does not occur. sent8: that both the crosswiseness and the recapturing occurs is incorrect if that the aromatherapy does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the peeping Freemasonry occurs. sent10: the preposing vandyke does not occur and the astrophysicalness does not occur if the megakaryocyticness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the fording happens and the mandibulofacialness occurs does not hold the fact that the fording does not occur hold. sent12: the impreciseness does not occur if the guttural does not occur. sent13: if the Confucian happens the crosswiseness happens. sent14: the fact that the crosswiseness does not occur is true if that the crosswiseness and the recapture happens is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the longness does not occur is not right if the sadisticness does not occur and the throw-in does not occur. sent16: if the quartzoseness does not occur then the teachership does not occur but the undynamicness happens. sent17: the cramming occurs. sent18: the aromatherapy does not occur. sent19: that the preposing vandyke occurs is true if that the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur does not hold. sent20: the fact that the cyclothymicness happens is right if the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur. sent21: if the specific does not occur the actableness does not occur. sent22: the fact that not the fluke but the photostating submitter occurs is incorrect. sent23: if the non-cyclothymicness and the non-crosswiseness happens the Confucian does not occur. sent24: if that the non-mandibulofacialness and the non-asynergicness happens is wrong then the arborolatry happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the cyclothymicness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Confucianness happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the crosswiseness occurs.; sent8 & sent18 -> int4: the fact that the crosswiseness happens and the recapturing occurs is not true.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the crosswiseness does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur is false.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the preposing vandyke happens.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the astrophysicalness does not occur is not incorrect.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that not the photostating sprouted but the megakaryocyticness occurs is true is not right.
$hypothesis$ = not the photostating sprouted but the megakaryocyticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the photostating sprouted does not occur but the megakaryocyticness occurs is caused by that the astrophysicalness does not occur. sent2: if the preposing Honshu occurs then the responsibleness occurs. sent3: that both the non-crosswiseness and the non-cyclothymicness occurs prevents that the Confucianness happens. sent4: that the preposing vandyke occurs is prevented by that both the recapturing and the astrophysicalness occurs. sent5: the astrophysicalness does not occur if the preposing vandyke occurs. sent6: if the cyclothymicness happens then the Confucian occurs. sent7: if the cyclothymicness does not occur the immunosuppressiveness does not occur and the Confucianness does not occur. sent8: that both the crosswiseness and the recapturing occurs is incorrect if that the aromatherapy does not occur is not wrong. sent9: the peeping Freemasonry occurs. sent10: the preposing vandyke does not occur and the astrophysicalness does not occur if the megakaryocyticness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the fording happens and the mandibulofacialness occurs does not hold the fact that the fording does not occur hold. sent12: the impreciseness does not occur if the guttural does not occur. sent13: if the Confucian happens the crosswiseness happens. sent14: the fact that the crosswiseness does not occur is true if that the crosswiseness and the recapture happens is incorrect. sent15: the fact that the longness does not occur is not right if the sadisticness does not occur and the throw-in does not occur. sent16: if the quartzoseness does not occur then the teachership does not occur but the undynamicness happens. sent17: the cramming occurs. sent18: the aromatherapy does not occur. sent19: that the preposing vandyke occurs is true if that the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur does not hold. sent20: the fact that the cyclothymicness happens is right if the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur. sent21: if the specific does not occur the actableness does not occur. sent22: the fact that not the fluke but the photostating submitter occurs is incorrect. sent23: if the non-cyclothymicness and the non-crosswiseness happens the Confucian does not occur. sent24: if that the non-mandibulofacialness and the non-asynergicness happens is wrong then the arborolatry happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the cyclothymicness occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the Confucianness happens.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the crosswiseness occurs.; sent8 & sent18 -> int4: the fact that the crosswiseness happens and the recapturing occurs is not true.; sent14 & int4 -> int5: the crosswiseness does not occur.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the fact that the remaining does not occur and the scientificness does not occur is false.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the preposing vandyke happens.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the astrophysicalness does not occur is not incorrect.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__