the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is aplitic and does not prop acetate is incorrect is not right.
sent1: that something is radiolucent but it does not moor Belgium is incorrect if it does bowl discomposure. sent2: the fact that the fact that the acetate is detachable and it props flutist is wrong is right. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is aplitic and it does prop acetate is not correct. sent4: if something is not a custom-made it is not aplitic and does not prop acetate. sent5: if a non-aplitic thing does not prop acetate it bowls discomposure. sent6: if there exists something such that it bowls discomposure then the fact that the acetate is aplitic thing that does prop acetate is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does bowl discomposure is not wrong. sent8: that the acetate is aplitic but it does not prop acetate does not hold if something does bowl discomposure.
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the acetate is aplitic but it does not prop acetate is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
that the flutist is radiolucent and does not moor Belgium is false.
sent1 -> int2: the fact that the flutist is radiolucent thing that does not moor Belgium does not hold if it does bowl discomposure.; sent5 -> int3: if the flutist is not aplitic and it does not prop acetate it bowls discomposure.; sent4 -> int4: if the flutist is not a custom-made it is non-aplitic thing that does not prop acetate.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is aplitic and does not prop acetate is incorrect is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is radiolucent but it does not moor Belgium is incorrect if it does bowl discomposure. sent2: the fact that the fact that the acetate is detachable and it props flutist is wrong is right. sent3: there is something such that the fact that it is aplitic and it does prop acetate is not correct. sent4: if something is not a custom-made it is not aplitic and does not prop acetate. sent5: if a non-aplitic thing does not prop acetate it bowls discomposure. sent6: if there exists something such that it bowls discomposure then the fact that the acetate is aplitic thing that does prop acetate is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that the fact that it does bowl discomposure is not wrong. sent8: that the acetate is aplitic but it does not prop acetate does not hold if something does bowl discomposure. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the acetate is aplitic but it does not prop acetate is not right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__