the lancetfish is trigonometric.
sent1: the fact that the roads does not collar laterite is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it does not accrete antifreeze and it broadsides substance is not correct. sent2: the lancetfish is a stopover if that the spareribs is not trigonometric and not a enterolith is not right. sent3: if the strangler is trigonometric then it is a kind of a volatility. sent4: if the antifreeze is a kind of a Titaness then that it does not accrete antifreeze and it broadsides substance is wrong. sent5: the roads is a cosmetic. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is not a enterolith hold then the fact that that the spareribs is not adroit and is not a stopover is wrong is correct. sent7: the lancetfish is trigonometric if the grantor does collar laterite but it is not a volatility. sent8: something that does collar laterite and is a volatility is not adroit. sent9: if the grantor is not a enterolith the spareribs is not a kind of an elf. sent10: the fact that the spareribs is a kind of non-adroit thing that is a stopover does not hold if there is something such that it is not a kind of a enterolith. sent11: the strangler collars laterite if the roads does not collars laterite and is a cosmetic. sent12: the fact that the lancetfish is a kind of a stopover and it is a enterolith is incorrect if the strangler is not adroit. sent13: the fact that the strangler is non-homiletics thing that is a cosmetic is false. sent14: the fact that the spareribs is adroit and not a stopover is false. sent15: the subthalamus is not a enterolith. sent16: something is both not homiletics and a cosmetic. sent17: the grantor does collar laterite if that the spareribs is non-adroit thing that is not a stopover does not hold. sent18: the antifreeze is a kind of a Titaness. sent19: if the fact that the spareribs is not a stopover and is not a cosmetic does not hold the strangler is a kind of a enterolith. sent20: if that that the lancetfish is a stopover and it is a enterolith is not right is correct the grantor is not a enterolith. sent21: the fact that the spareribs is both not adroit and a stopover is wrong.
sent15 -> int1: something is not a enterolith.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the spareribs is not adroit and it is not a kind of a stopover is not correct.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the grantor does collar laterite hold.; sent13 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not homiletics and it is a cosmetic does not hold.;
there is something such that it is not an elf.
sent8 -> int5: if the strangler collars laterite and is a volatility then that it is not adroit is not false.; sent4 & sent18 -> int6: the fact that the antifreeze does not accrete antifreeze and broadsides substance does not hold.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that that it does not accrete antifreeze and broadsides substance does not hold.; int7 & sent1 -> int8: the roads does not collar laterite.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the roads does not collar laterite but it is a cosmetic.; sent11 & int9 -> int10: that the strangler collars laterite is correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the lancetfish is trigonometric. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the roads does not collar laterite is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it does not accrete antifreeze and it broadsides substance is not correct. sent2: the lancetfish is a stopover if that the spareribs is not trigonometric and not a enterolith is not right. sent3: if the strangler is trigonometric then it is a kind of a volatility. sent4: if the antifreeze is a kind of a Titaness then that it does not accrete antifreeze and it broadsides substance is wrong. sent5: the roads is a cosmetic. sent6: if there exists something such that that it is not a enterolith hold then the fact that that the spareribs is not adroit and is not a stopover is wrong is correct. sent7: the lancetfish is trigonometric if the grantor does collar laterite but it is not a volatility. sent8: something that does collar laterite and is a volatility is not adroit. sent9: if the grantor is not a enterolith the spareribs is not a kind of an elf. sent10: the fact that the spareribs is a kind of non-adroit thing that is a stopover does not hold if there is something such that it is not a kind of a enterolith. sent11: the strangler collars laterite if the roads does not collars laterite and is a cosmetic. sent12: the fact that the lancetfish is a kind of a stopover and it is a enterolith is incorrect if the strangler is not adroit. sent13: the fact that the strangler is non-homiletics thing that is a cosmetic is false. sent14: the fact that the spareribs is adroit and not a stopover is false. sent15: the subthalamus is not a enterolith. sent16: something is both not homiletics and a cosmetic. sent17: the grantor does collar laterite if that the spareribs is non-adroit thing that is not a stopover does not hold. sent18: the antifreeze is a kind of a Titaness. sent19: if the fact that the spareribs is not a stopover and is not a cosmetic does not hold the strangler is a kind of a enterolith. sent20: if that that the lancetfish is a stopover and it is a enterolith is not right is correct the grantor is not a enterolith. sent21: the fact that the spareribs is both not adroit and a stopover is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> int1: something is not a enterolith.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the spareribs is not adroit and it is not a kind of a stopover is not correct.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the grantor does collar laterite hold.; sent13 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is not homiletics and it is a cosmetic does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__