that the repairman is inglorious and/or does not cap airing is wrong.
sent1: that the repairman is inglorious and/or does not cap airing is incorrect if the GP is not a pig. sent2: the GP does not nettle rectum. sent3: if the frontispiece nettles boxfish but it is not a rainforest then the boxfish is not a Asimov. sent4: the fact that the clingfilm is not a kind of a Ellington and it is not a buckleya does not hold if something is diluvian. sent5: if something is an adjective then it does nettle boxfish and it is not a rainforest. sent6: the clingfilm pigs. sent7: the clingfilm is not ischemic. sent8: the repairman caps airing if the GP is not a pig. sent9: the apprentice is not a Hickock. sent10: the GP is a kind of a kirtle if the clingfilm is a kind of a Hickock. sent11: the GP is a Hickock but it is not a kirtle if the clingfilm pigs. sent12: something does not wive if it is a waratah and it is a buckleya. sent13: something is both not a helminth and a Myrmecophaga if it does not nettle rectum. sent14: the clingfilm is a waratah if the GP is a waratah. sent15: the fact that the clingfilm is a kind of a kirtle is right. sent16: the repairman is a kirtle if there exists something such that it does not wive. sent17: the kingsnake is diluvian if there exists something such that it is not a Asimov. sent18: if something that is not a helminth is a Myrmecophaga it is a waratah. sent19: everything is an adjective. sent20: if the clingfilm is inglorious that the repairman is a kind of a kirtle is not wrong. sent21: the fact that the repairman does cap airing is not wrong. sent22: the fact that if the clingfilm is a kind of a kirtle the GP is a kind of a Hickock but it is not a kind of a pig is not incorrect. sent23: if the fact that something is both not a Ellington and not a buckleya is not true then the fact that it is a buckleya is right.
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: the GP is a Hickock and is not a pig.; int1 -> int2: the GP does not pig.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the repairman is inglorious or it does not cap airing or both.
sent23 -> int3: the clingfilm is a buckleya if that it is not a Ellington and it is not a kind of a buckleya is incorrect.; sent5 -> int4: if that the nonpartisan is an adjective is correct it does nettle boxfish and is not a kind of a rainforest.; sent19 -> int5: the nonpartisan is an adjective.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the nonpartisan nettles boxfish and is not a rainforest.; int6 -> int7: everything does nettle boxfish and is not a kind of a rainforest.; int7 -> int8: the frontispiece nettles boxfish and is not a rainforest.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the boxfish is not a Asimov.; int9 -> int10: something is not a kind of a Asimov.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the kingsnake is diluvian.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is diluvian.; int12 & sent4 -> int13: that the fact that the fact that the clingfilm is not a Ellington and is not a buckleya hold is wrong is true.; int3 & int13 -> int14: the clingfilm is a buckleya.; sent13 -> int15: if the GP does not nettle rectum then it is not a helminth and it is a Myrmecophaga.; sent2 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the GP is both not a helminth and a Myrmecophaga is right.; sent18 -> int17: if the GP is not a helminth but it is a kind of a Myrmecophaga then it is a kind of a waratah.; int16 & int17 -> int18: the GP is a kind of a waratah.; sent14 & int18 -> int19: the clingfilm is a waratah.; int14 & int19 -> int20: the clingfilm is a kind of a waratah and is a buckleya.; sent12 -> int21: the clingfilm does not wive if it is a waratah and it is a buckleya.; int20 & int21 -> int22: the fact that the clingfilm does not wive is right.; int22 -> int23: something does not wive.; int23 & sent16 -> int24: the repairman is a kirtle.;
$hypothesis$ = that the repairman is inglorious and/or does not cap airing is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the repairman is inglorious and/or does not cap airing is incorrect if the GP is not a pig. sent2: the GP does not nettle rectum. sent3: if the frontispiece nettles boxfish but it is not a rainforest then the boxfish is not a Asimov. sent4: the fact that the clingfilm is not a kind of a Ellington and it is not a buckleya does not hold if something is diluvian. sent5: if something is an adjective then it does nettle boxfish and it is not a rainforest. sent6: the clingfilm pigs. sent7: the clingfilm is not ischemic. sent8: the repairman caps airing if the GP is not a pig. sent9: the apprentice is not a Hickock. sent10: the GP is a kind of a kirtle if the clingfilm is a kind of a Hickock. sent11: the GP is a Hickock but it is not a kirtle if the clingfilm pigs. sent12: something does not wive if it is a waratah and it is a buckleya. sent13: something is both not a helminth and a Myrmecophaga if it does not nettle rectum. sent14: the clingfilm is a waratah if the GP is a waratah. sent15: the fact that the clingfilm is a kind of a kirtle is right. sent16: the repairman is a kirtle if there exists something such that it does not wive. sent17: the kingsnake is diluvian if there exists something such that it is not a Asimov. sent18: if something that is not a helminth is a Myrmecophaga it is a waratah. sent19: everything is an adjective. sent20: if the clingfilm is inglorious that the repairman is a kind of a kirtle is not wrong. sent21: the fact that the repairman does cap airing is not wrong. sent22: the fact that if the clingfilm is a kind of a kirtle the GP is a kind of a Hickock but it is not a kind of a pig is not incorrect. sent23: if the fact that something is both not a Ellington and not a buckleya is not true then the fact that it is a buckleya is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent15 -> int1: the GP is a Hickock and is not a pig.; int1 -> int2: the GP does not pig.; sent1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__