the fact that if the lancewood is aspectual then the mezzo-relievo is a kind of non-dictyopteran thing that does guarantee ultramontane is not true.
sent1: if that the enteron is not a sinuosity or not dicarboxylic or both is wrong the lancewood is not aspectual. sent2: if the fact that the mezzo-relievo is not aspectual and/or it is not a kind of a sinuosity is not right then the lancewood is not dictyopteran. sent3: if there is something such that it does not guarantee ultramontane that either the ATM is not a warmth or it is not an enforcer or both is not correct. sent4: if the ATM guarantees ultramontane the mezzo-relievo is non-dictyopteran thing that guarantees ultramontane. sent5: the enteron does not guarantee ultramontane if a aspectual thing is dictyopteran. sent6: everything is aspectual. sent7: the fact that the enteron is not a sinuosity or it is not dicarboxylic or both is not correct if that the ATM does not guarantee ultramontane hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lancewood is aspectual.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ATM does not guarantee ultramontane.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the enteron is not a kind of a sinuosity and/or is not dicarboxylic is not correct.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the lancewood is not aspectual.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the ATM does guarantee ultramontane.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the mezzo-relievo is not dictyopteran but it does guarantee ultramontane.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the ATM is not a warmth or not an enforcer or both is false.
sent6 -> int6: the fact that the mezzo-relievo is aspectual is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the lancewood is aspectual then the mezzo-relievo is a kind of non-dictyopteran thing that does guarantee ultramontane is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the enteron is not a sinuosity or not dicarboxylic or both is wrong the lancewood is not aspectual. sent2: if the fact that the mezzo-relievo is not aspectual and/or it is not a kind of a sinuosity is not right then the lancewood is not dictyopteran. sent3: if there is something such that it does not guarantee ultramontane that either the ATM is not a warmth or it is not an enforcer or both is not correct. sent4: if the ATM guarantees ultramontane the mezzo-relievo is non-dictyopteran thing that guarantees ultramontane. sent5: the enteron does not guarantee ultramontane if a aspectual thing is dictyopteran. sent6: everything is aspectual. sent7: the fact that the enteron is not a sinuosity or it is not dicarboxylic or both is not correct if that the ATM does not guarantee ultramontane hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lancewood is aspectual.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ATM does not guarantee ultramontane.; sent7 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the enteron is not a kind of a sinuosity and/or is not dicarboxylic is not correct.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the lancewood is not aspectual.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the ATM does guarantee ultramontane.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the mezzo-relievo is not dictyopteran but it does guarantee ultramontane.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__