the fluoroscope is not full-term.
sent1: the fluoroscope does melanize headful and it is full-term if the adenoid is not multilingual. sent2: the stack is not a elapid if the fact that the archaist does not scrap and is not a diploidy does not hold. sent3: the xenon is not a diploidy and not a audiometry. sent4: the adenoid is a elapid or is not multilingual or both if the crystallographer is not a kind of a elapid. sent5: the fact that the archaist is not a kind of a scrap but it is a diploidy is incorrect. sent6: if the stack is not a kind of a elapid then the crystallographer is a elapid and/or it does not melanize trueness. sent7: the fluoroscope melanizes headful. sent8: the marang is not a kind of a elapid and is non-docile. sent9: if the crystallographer is a kind of a elapid then the reception is a ytterbium. sent10: that the fluoroscope does not melanize trueness and it is not a diploidy is not correct. sent11: the reception is a ytterbium if the crystallographer does not melanize trueness. sent12: the reception is a ytterbium and/or it is not a elapid. sent13: if something is a kind of a diploidy that is a kind of a scrap it is not full-term. sent14: if the reception is a ytterbium the adenoid is not multilingual. sent15: something is a diploidy if the fact that it does not melanize trueness and it is not a diploidy is not right. sent16: that the archaist is a diploidy is not incorrect. sent17: the reception is not full-term if the fluoroscope is a ytterbium. sent18: the fact that the archaist does not melanize trueness hold. sent19: the archaist does not melanize trueness if the crystallographer is a scrap. sent20: the calamus is a scrap and melanizes ligament. sent21: the reception is not full-term.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archaist does not scrap and it is not a diploidy.; assump1 -> int1: the archaist is not a diploidy.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the archaist does not scrap and is not a kind of a diploidy is incorrect.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that the stack is not a elapid hold.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the crystallographer either is a kind of a elapid or does not melanize trueness or both.; int5 & sent9 & sent11 -> int6: the reception is a ytterbium.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the adenoid is not multilingual.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the fluoroscope melanizes headful and is full-term.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the fluoroscope is not full-term.
sent13 -> int9: that the fluoroscope is not full-term is not wrong if it is a diploidy and is a scrap.; sent15 -> int10: the fluoroscope is a diploidy if the fact that it does not melanize trueness and it is not a kind of a diploidy does not hold.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: that the fluoroscope is a kind of a diploidy hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fluoroscope is not full-term. ; $context$ = sent1: the fluoroscope does melanize headful and it is full-term if the adenoid is not multilingual. sent2: the stack is not a elapid if the fact that the archaist does not scrap and is not a diploidy does not hold. sent3: the xenon is not a diploidy and not a audiometry. sent4: the adenoid is a elapid or is not multilingual or both if the crystallographer is not a kind of a elapid. sent5: the fact that the archaist is not a kind of a scrap but it is a diploidy is incorrect. sent6: if the stack is not a kind of a elapid then the crystallographer is a elapid and/or it does not melanize trueness. sent7: the fluoroscope melanizes headful. sent8: the marang is not a kind of a elapid and is non-docile. sent9: if the crystallographer is a kind of a elapid then the reception is a ytterbium. sent10: that the fluoroscope does not melanize trueness and it is not a diploidy is not correct. sent11: the reception is a ytterbium if the crystallographer does not melanize trueness. sent12: the reception is a ytterbium and/or it is not a elapid. sent13: if something is a kind of a diploidy that is a kind of a scrap it is not full-term. sent14: if the reception is a ytterbium the adenoid is not multilingual. sent15: something is a diploidy if the fact that it does not melanize trueness and it is not a diploidy is not right. sent16: that the archaist is a diploidy is not incorrect. sent17: the reception is not full-term if the fluoroscope is a ytterbium. sent18: the fact that the archaist does not melanize trueness hold. sent19: the archaist does not melanize trueness if the crystallographer is a scrap. sent20: the calamus is a scrap and melanizes ligament. sent21: the reception is not full-term. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the archaist does not scrap and it is not a diploidy.; assump1 -> int1: the archaist is not a diploidy.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the archaist does not scrap and is not a kind of a diploidy is incorrect.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that the stack is not a elapid hold.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the crystallographer either is a kind of a elapid or does not melanize trueness or both.; int5 & sent9 & sent11 -> int6: the reception is a ytterbium.; sent14 & int6 -> int7: the adenoid is not multilingual.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the fluoroscope melanizes headful and is full-term.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__