the fact that if the vibrionicness occurs the orchestration occurs is incorrect.
sent1: if the coursing does not occur both the Browning and the vibrionicness occurs. sent2: if the vibrionicness occurs and the course occurs then the exploratoriness does not occur. sent3: the course occurs. sent4: the weightlessness does not occur if the fact that the vibrionicness but not the coursing occurs does not hold. sent5: the nonclassicalness occurs and the symbolicness happens. sent6: if the exploratoriness does not occur the fact that the orchestration happens is not false. sent7: the glovelessness occurs. sent8: the competentness occurs if the saraband happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vibrionicness occurs.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the vibrionicness occurs and the coursing occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the exploratoriness does not occur.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the orchestration occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the Browning occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the vibrionicness occurs the orchestration occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the coursing does not occur both the Browning and the vibrionicness occurs. sent2: if the vibrionicness occurs and the course occurs then the exploratoriness does not occur. sent3: the course occurs. sent4: the weightlessness does not occur if the fact that the vibrionicness but not the coursing occurs does not hold. sent5: the nonclassicalness occurs and the symbolicness happens. sent6: if the exploratoriness does not occur the fact that the orchestration happens is not false. sent7: the glovelessness occurs. sent8: the competentness occurs if the saraband happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vibrionicness occurs.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the vibrionicness occurs and the coursing occurs.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the exploratoriness does not occur.; sent6 & int2 -> int3: the orchestration occurs.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__