the fact that if the Londoner is a grantee that the pyrograph is a gigabyte hold is not right.
sent1: the pyrograph procrastinates. sent2: that the Londoner is a gigabyte is not incorrect if the pyrograph seethes. sent3: if the kayak procrastinates then the pyrograph is a gigabyte. sent4: the kayak does seethe. sent5: if the Londoner is a suspension then the pyrograph is not non-antiviral. sent6: if the kayak is a grantee then the Londoner does procrastinate. sent7: if the Londoner is a kind of a gigabyte that the pyrograph is a grantee is not incorrect. sent8: the Londoner is a gigabyte if the pyrograph is a kind of a grantee. sent9: the spendthrift is a kind of a grantee. sent10: the Londoner does seethe if it is a grantee. sent11: the kayak is a kind of a deposition. sent12: the foregrounding is a gigabyte. sent13: the Teller procrastinates. sent14: if the kayak is a kind of a gigabyte then the pyrograph procrastinates. sent15: the kayak does seethe if the Londoner does procrastinate. sent16: the fact that the kayak is a kind of a gigabyte is not wrong if the pyrograph does procrastinate. sent17: the kayak is a gigabyte. sent18: the kayak is a grantee. sent19: the Londoner does procrastinate. sent20: the Londoner commercializes icetray. sent21: the kayak procrastinates if the Londoner seethes. sent22: the pyrograph does seethe if the Londoner is a gigabyte.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Londoner is a grantee hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Londoner seethes.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: that the kayak procrastinates is correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the pyrograph is a kind of a gigabyte.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the Londoner is a grantee that the pyrograph is a gigabyte hold is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the pyrograph procrastinates. sent2: that the Londoner is a gigabyte is not incorrect if the pyrograph seethes. sent3: if the kayak procrastinates then the pyrograph is a gigabyte. sent4: the kayak does seethe. sent5: if the Londoner is a suspension then the pyrograph is not non-antiviral. sent6: if the kayak is a grantee then the Londoner does procrastinate. sent7: if the Londoner is a kind of a gigabyte that the pyrograph is a grantee is not incorrect. sent8: the Londoner is a gigabyte if the pyrograph is a kind of a grantee. sent9: the spendthrift is a kind of a grantee. sent10: the Londoner does seethe if it is a grantee. sent11: the kayak is a kind of a deposition. sent12: the foregrounding is a gigabyte. sent13: the Teller procrastinates. sent14: if the kayak is a kind of a gigabyte then the pyrograph procrastinates. sent15: the kayak does seethe if the Londoner does procrastinate. sent16: the fact that the kayak is a kind of a gigabyte is not wrong if the pyrograph does procrastinate. sent17: the kayak is a gigabyte. sent18: the kayak is a grantee. sent19: the Londoner does procrastinate. sent20: the Londoner commercializes icetray. sent21: the kayak procrastinates if the Londoner seethes. sent22: the pyrograph does seethe if the Londoner is a gigabyte. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Londoner is a grantee hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the Londoner seethes.; int1 & sent21 -> int2: that the kayak procrastinates is correct.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the pyrograph is a kind of a gigabyte.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__