the Neandertal does not utter Worcestershire.
sent1: the instructions is continual. sent2: the Neandertal utters Worcestershire if that it is not continual and/or it does falsify pallidum does not hold. sent3: the ATM is a Saussure if the fact that the Neandertal is not continual and/or it does falsify pallidum is right. sent4: the instructions is not a kind of a Communist if the ATM is a Saussure. sent5: the instructions is bifilar. sent6: the supercharger is a kind of a Saussure. sent7: the instructions does not utter Worcestershire. sent8: the instructions is a Communist if it is bifilar. sent9: if the instructions is not bifilar and/or it does falsify pallidum then the Neandertal is a Communist. sent10: the ATM is not bifilar if it does not utter Humulin and is cataphatic. sent11: the fact that the Neandertal is not a Saussure and/or it does falsify pallidum is wrong. sent12: if that the instructions does not falsify pallidum and/or is a Communist is incorrect it is not non-bifilar.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Neandertal is not continual or falsifies pallidum or both is not incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ATM is a kind of a Saussure hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the instructions is not a kind of a Communist.; sent8 & sent5 -> int3: the instructions is a kind of a Communist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the Neandertal is not continual and/or it falsifies pallidum does not hold.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the Neandertal does not utter Worcestershire.
$hypothesis$ = the Neandertal does not utter Worcestershire. ; $context$ = sent1: the instructions is continual. sent2: the Neandertal utters Worcestershire if that it is not continual and/or it does falsify pallidum does not hold. sent3: the ATM is a Saussure if the fact that the Neandertal is not continual and/or it does falsify pallidum is right. sent4: the instructions is not a kind of a Communist if the ATM is a Saussure. sent5: the instructions is bifilar. sent6: the supercharger is a kind of a Saussure. sent7: the instructions does not utter Worcestershire. sent8: the instructions is a Communist if it is bifilar. sent9: if the instructions is not bifilar and/or it does falsify pallidum then the Neandertal is a Communist. sent10: the ATM is not bifilar if it does not utter Humulin and is cataphatic. sent11: the fact that the Neandertal is not a Saussure and/or it does falsify pallidum is wrong. sent12: if that the instructions does not falsify pallidum and/or is a Communist is incorrect it is not non-bifilar. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Neandertal is not continual or falsifies pallidum or both is not incorrect.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ATM is a kind of a Saussure hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the instructions is not a kind of a Communist.; sent8 & sent5 -> int3: the instructions is a kind of a Communist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the Neandertal is not continual and/or it falsifies pallidum does not hold.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__