something is not a breadboard.
sent1: something is not woolen and it is not a animateness if it does not yell. sent2: the Thessalian is a jonah and/or it is propagative. sent3: that the institution is superficial thing that does not guarantee pastorship is wrong. sent4: if something is not superficial then it does process dumping. sent5: the institution is a breadboard or it is propagative or both if it guarantees pastorship. sent6: the weather is not a kind of a animateness if the Antiguan is not woolen and not a animateness. sent7: the sandbag does not yak but it arrogates brag if the soundman processes reformism. sent8: there exists something such that it is a breadboard. sent9: if that the institution is superficial but it does not guarantee pastorship is wrong it is not superficial. sent10: if the sandbag is not a yak and does arrogate brag the post-horse arrogate brag. sent11: if the weather is not a animateness then that the intumescence is cenobitic but it does not guarantee pastorship is not right. sent12: something guarantees pastorship if it is not propagative. sent13: if that something is soft hold then it is not vicarial. sent14: if the Thessalian is not a jonah or it is propagative or both then that the institution does not process dumping is correct. sent15: if the Thessalian is a kind of a breadboard it is not a kind of a jonah and/or it is propagative. sent16: the post-horse is soft. sent17: the institution does not process dumping if the Thessalian is not a jonah. sent18: the fact that the Thessalian does process antipode and is not a catananche is wrong if that the institution is not a kind of a breadboard is not false. sent19: the soundman processes reformism. sent20: if something is not cenobitic then that it processes dumping and is superficial does not hold. sent21: if something that does arrogate brag is not vicarial the Antiguan does not yell. sent22: if that the intumescence is cenobitic but it does not guarantee pastorship is incorrect the institution is not cenobitic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Thessalian is a breadboard is correct.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: either the Thessalian is not a jonah or it is propagative or both.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the institution does not process dumping.; sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the institution is not superficial is true then it processes dumping.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the institution is not superficial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the institution does process dumping.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Thessalian is not a breadboard.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the Thessalian does process antipode and is not a kind of a catananche is not true.
sent20 -> int8: that the institution processes dumping and it is superficial does not hold if it is not cenobitic.; sent1 -> int9: if the fact that the Antiguan does not yell is true it is both not woolen and not a animateness.; sent7 & sent19 -> int10: the sandbag is not a yak but it does arrogate brag.; sent10 & int10 -> int11: the post-horse does arrogate brag.; sent13 -> int12: the post-horse is non-vicarial if it is soft.; int12 & sent16 -> int13: the post-horse is non-vicarial.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the post-horse arrogates brag but it is not vicarial.; int14 -> int15: that something does arrogate brag but it is not vicarial is not incorrect.; int15 & sent21 -> int16: the Antiguan does not yell.; int9 & int16 -> int17: the Antiguan is a kind of non-woolen thing that is not a animateness.; sent6 & int17 -> int18: the weather is not a animateness.; sent11 & int18 -> int19: that the intumescence is a kind of cenobitic thing that does not guarantee pastorship does not hold.; sent22 & int19 -> int20: the institution is not cenobitic.; int8 & int20 -> int21: that the institution does process dumping and is superficial is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not a breadboard. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not woolen and it is not a animateness if it does not yell. sent2: the Thessalian is a jonah and/or it is propagative. sent3: that the institution is superficial thing that does not guarantee pastorship is wrong. sent4: if something is not superficial then it does process dumping. sent5: the institution is a breadboard or it is propagative or both if it guarantees pastorship. sent6: the weather is not a kind of a animateness if the Antiguan is not woolen and not a animateness. sent7: the sandbag does not yak but it arrogates brag if the soundman processes reformism. sent8: there exists something such that it is a breadboard. sent9: if that the institution is superficial but it does not guarantee pastorship is wrong it is not superficial. sent10: if the sandbag is not a yak and does arrogate brag the post-horse arrogate brag. sent11: if the weather is not a animateness then that the intumescence is cenobitic but it does not guarantee pastorship is not right. sent12: something guarantees pastorship if it is not propagative. sent13: if that something is soft hold then it is not vicarial. sent14: if the Thessalian is not a jonah or it is propagative or both then that the institution does not process dumping is correct. sent15: if the Thessalian is a kind of a breadboard it is not a kind of a jonah and/or it is propagative. sent16: the post-horse is soft. sent17: the institution does not process dumping if the Thessalian is not a jonah. sent18: the fact that the Thessalian does process antipode and is not a catananche is wrong if that the institution is not a kind of a breadboard is not false. sent19: the soundman processes reformism. sent20: if something is not cenobitic then that it processes dumping and is superficial does not hold. sent21: if something that does arrogate brag is not vicarial the Antiguan does not yell. sent22: if that the intumescence is cenobitic but it does not guarantee pastorship is incorrect the institution is not cenobitic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Thessalian is a breadboard is correct.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: either the Thessalian is not a jonah or it is propagative or both.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the institution does not process dumping.; sent4 -> int3: if the fact that the institution is not superficial is true then it processes dumping.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the institution is not superficial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the institution does process dumping.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the Thessalian is not a breadboard.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__