the tube but not the grammaticalness occurs.
sent1: if the leisure does not occur that the unwomanliness happens but the halving cornhusker does not occur is wrong. sent2: the concaveness occurs and the tube occurs. sent3: the non-pubertalness is prevented by the functioning fingerpost. sent4: the agreeableness occurs and the halving Melpomene occurs. sent5: the functioning fingerpost does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the non-technophilicness and the insurmountableness happens is wrong the functioning fingerpost happens. sent7: that not the unwomanliness but the halving cornhusker occurs is false. sent8: the preliminary occurs. sent9: that both the adenoidalness and the pubertalness occurs is caused by that the functioning fingerpost does not occur. sent10: the non-adenoidalness is brought about by that the belaying occurs and the leisure occurs. sent11: the fact that that both the non-technophilicness and the insurmountableness happens hold is wrong if the functioning hog does not occur. sent12: the fact that the adenoidalness does not occur and the leisure does not occur does not hold if the halving cornhusker does not occur. sent13: the fact that if the concaveness does not occur then the fact that the halving cornhusker occurs and the unwomanliness occurs does not hold is true. sent14: that both the tubing and the non-grammaticalness happens is false if the belaying does not occur. sent15: the belay happens. sent16: the pubertalness occurs if the functioning fingerpost does not occur. sent17: the halving cornhusker does not occur if that the fact that both the halving cornhusker and the unwomanliness happens is incorrect hold. sent18: that the unwomanliness happens and the halving cornhusker does not occur is not correct. sent19: if the leisure does not occur the fact that both the non-unwomanliness and the halving cornhusker occurs is not right. sent20: that the stylization and the Abkhaz happens results in that the functioning hog does not occur. sent21: the concaveness occurs. sent22: that that the unwomanliness does not occur and the halving cornhusker does not occur is not right is not wrong if the leisure does not occur. sent23: that the pubertalness happens hold. sent24: if the kafkaesqueness does not occur the diving Villahermosa occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leisure occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the belay and the leisure occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the adenoidalness does not occur.; sent9 & sent5 -> int3: the adenoidalness happens and the pubertalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the adenoidalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the leisure does not occur.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the fact that the unwomanliness does not occur and the halving cornhusker does not occur is not correct.; sent2 -> int8: the tubing occurs.;
the fact that the tube and the non-grammaticalness occurs is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the tube but not the grammaticalness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the leisure does not occur that the unwomanliness happens but the halving cornhusker does not occur is wrong. sent2: the concaveness occurs and the tube occurs. sent3: the non-pubertalness is prevented by the functioning fingerpost. sent4: the agreeableness occurs and the halving Melpomene occurs. sent5: the functioning fingerpost does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the non-technophilicness and the insurmountableness happens is wrong the functioning fingerpost happens. sent7: that not the unwomanliness but the halving cornhusker occurs is false. sent8: the preliminary occurs. sent9: that both the adenoidalness and the pubertalness occurs is caused by that the functioning fingerpost does not occur. sent10: the non-adenoidalness is brought about by that the belaying occurs and the leisure occurs. sent11: the fact that that both the non-technophilicness and the insurmountableness happens hold is wrong if the functioning hog does not occur. sent12: the fact that the adenoidalness does not occur and the leisure does not occur does not hold if the halving cornhusker does not occur. sent13: the fact that if the concaveness does not occur then the fact that the halving cornhusker occurs and the unwomanliness occurs does not hold is true. sent14: that both the tubing and the non-grammaticalness happens is false if the belaying does not occur. sent15: the belay happens. sent16: the pubertalness occurs if the functioning fingerpost does not occur. sent17: the halving cornhusker does not occur if that the fact that both the halving cornhusker and the unwomanliness happens is incorrect hold. sent18: that the unwomanliness happens and the halving cornhusker does not occur is not correct. sent19: if the leisure does not occur the fact that both the non-unwomanliness and the halving cornhusker occurs is not right. sent20: that the stylization and the Abkhaz happens results in that the functioning hog does not occur. sent21: the concaveness occurs. sent22: that that the unwomanliness does not occur and the halving cornhusker does not occur is not right is not wrong if the leisure does not occur. sent23: that the pubertalness happens hold. sent24: if the kafkaesqueness does not occur the diving Villahermosa occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leisure occurs.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the belay and the leisure occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the adenoidalness does not occur.; sent9 & sent5 -> int3: the adenoidalness happens and the pubertalness happens.; int3 -> int4: the adenoidalness happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the leisure does not occur.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the fact that the unwomanliness does not occur and the halving cornhusker does not occur is not correct.; sent2 -> int8: the tubing occurs.; __UNKNOWN__