the fact that there is something such that if it is not a commutability then it is not a nympholepsy and does grumble kelpie is not correct.
sent1: if something is not a kind of a commutability it is not a nympholepsy and it does grumble kelpie. sent2: the felwort does not discourage and is clausal if it is not a nympholepsy. sent3: the fact that the introversion is a nympholepsy and it grumbles kelpie hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a commutability is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is starchy then it does not stint countertransference and stints secessionist. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a commutability then it grumbles kelpie. sent6: a non-convenient thing is a kind of non-ferial thing that is a kind of a Taricha. sent7: the introversion is a commutability if it is not a hooknose. sent8: something is not a nympholepsy but it does grumble kelpie if it is a commutability. sent9: the introversion is not a nympholepsy and does grumble kelpie if that it is a kind of a commutability is not wrong. sent10: something that does not eavesdrop does fringe and is low-interest. sent11: something grumbles kelpie if it is not a kind of a commutability. sent12: if the introversion is not a commutability then it grumbles kelpie. sent13: if the introversion is a MIT it is not a Drixoral but a commutability. sent14: the introversion is maxillodental and it is a venerator if it does not grumble kelpie. sent15: something does not tell and is a Friulian if it is not provident.
sent1 -> int1: if the introversion is not a commutability it is not a nympholepsy and does grumble kelpie.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is not convenient it is not ferial and is a kind of a Taricha.
sent6 -> int2: the beluga is not ferial but a Taricha if it is not convenient.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a commutability then it is not a nympholepsy and does grumble kelpie is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a kind of a commutability it is not a nympholepsy and it does grumble kelpie. sent2: the felwort does not discourage and is clausal if it is not a nympholepsy. sent3: the fact that the introversion is a nympholepsy and it grumbles kelpie hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a commutability is not incorrect. sent4: there is something such that if it is starchy then it does not stint countertransference and stints secessionist. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not a commutability then it grumbles kelpie. sent6: a non-convenient thing is a kind of non-ferial thing that is a kind of a Taricha. sent7: the introversion is a commutability if it is not a hooknose. sent8: something is not a nympholepsy but it does grumble kelpie if it is a commutability. sent9: the introversion is not a nympholepsy and does grumble kelpie if that it is a kind of a commutability is not wrong. sent10: something that does not eavesdrop does fringe and is low-interest. sent11: something grumbles kelpie if it is not a kind of a commutability. sent12: if the introversion is not a commutability then it grumbles kelpie. sent13: if the introversion is a MIT it is not a Drixoral but a commutability. sent14: the introversion is maxillodental and it is a venerator if it does not grumble kelpie. sent15: something does not tell and is a Friulian if it is not provident. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the introversion is not a commutability it is not a nympholepsy and does grumble kelpie.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__