that the oxidant is a myna or it does not cloy discontinuance or both is wrong.
sent1: the Passamaquody does cloy discontinuance and/or it does not approbate envoy if the oxidant cloy discontinuance. sent2: if something that underquotes Acheron does not approbate envoy it is a kind of a myna. sent3: the oxidant is a myna and/or it cloys discontinuance. sent4: the oxidant either is a kind of a myna or cloys discontinuance or both if the Passamaquody is a myna. sent5: the oxidant does not approbate silkworm if that the envoy does approbate silkworm and is not a kind of a phlebotomus is not correct. sent6: if something that underquotes Acheron does not cloy discontinuance then it is a kind of a myna. sent7: if something cloys discontinuance and does not approbate envoy it does beware. sent8: something does beware and it is phonetics if it does not approbate silkworm. sent9: the fact that the Passamaquody does not approbate envoy is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that something is a myna and/or it does not cloy discontinuance is wrong if it does beware. sent11: the Passamaquody is a myna if it does underquote Acheron and does approbate envoy. sent12: if the Passamaquody does depose formication it is a nocturne. sent13: if something that does underquote Acheron does approbate envoy then that it is a myna is true. sent14: the fact that something does not approbate silkworm and bewares is false if it is not phonetics. sent15: the oxidant either is a myna or does not cloy discontinuance or both if the Passamaquody is a myna. sent16: if the envoy approbates envoy and does not beware then it is a kind of a myna. sent17: if that the Passamaquody is a myna is true then the oxidant is a kind of a myna and/or it does not underquote Acheron. sent18: if the envoy does not beware the Passamaquody underquotes Acheron and does not approbate envoy. sent19: if the envoy does not beware that the Passamaquody does not approbate envoy is not wrong. sent20: the oxidant approbates envoy and/or is not a myna. sent21: if the Passamaquody cloys discontinuance and is not a kind of a myna it does underquote Acheron. sent22: the envoy does not beware.
sent18 & sent22 -> int1: the Passamaquody does underquote Acheron but it does not approbate envoy.; sent2 -> int2: if the Passamaquody underquotes Acheron and does not approbate envoy it is a myna.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Passamaquody is a myna.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
that the oxidant is a myna and/or it does not cloy discontinuance is wrong.
sent10 -> int4: if the oxidant bewares the fact that it is a kind of a myna and/or it does not cloy discontinuance does not hold.; sent8 -> int5: that the oxidant bewares and is phonetics is not wrong if it does not approbate silkworm.;
$hypothesis$ = that the oxidant is a myna or it does not cloy discontinuance or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the Passamaquody does cloy discontinuance and/or it does not approbate envoy if the oxidant cloy discontinuance. sent2: if something that underquotes Acheron does not approbate envoy it is a kind of a myna. sent3: the oxidant is a myna and/or it cloys discontinuance. sent4: the oxidant either is a kind of a myna or cloys discontinuance or both if the Passamaquody is a myna. sent5: the oxidant does not approbate silkworm if that the envoy does approbate silkworm and is not a kind of a phlebotomus is not correct. sent6: if something that underquotes Acheron does not cloy discontinuance then it is a kind of a myna. sent7: if something cloys discontinuance and does not approbate envoy it does beware. sent8: something does beware and it is phonetics if it does not approbate silkworm. sent9: the fact that the Passamaquody does not approbate envoy is not incorrect. sent10: the fact that something is a myna and/or it does not cloy discontinuance is wrong if it does beware. sent11: the Passamaquody is a myna if it does underquote Acheron and does approbate envoy. sent12: if the Passamaquody does depose formication it is a nocturne. sent13: if something that does underquote Acheron does approbate envoy then that it is a myna is true. sent14: the fact that something does not approbate silkworm and bewares is false if it is not phonetics. sent15: the oxidant either is a myna or does not cloy discontinuance or both if the Passamaquody is a myna. sent16: if the envoy approbates envoy and does not beware then it is a kind of a myna. sent17: if that the Passamaquody is a myna is true then the oxidant is a kind of a myna and/or it does not underquote Acheron. sent18: if the envoy does not beware the Passamaquody underquotes Acheron and does not approbate envoy. sent19: if the envoy does not beware that the Passamaquody does not approbate envoy is not wrong. sent20: the oxidant approbates envoy and/or is not a myna. sent21: if the Passamaquody cloys discontinuance and is not a kind of a myna it does underquote Acheron. sent22: the envoy does not beware. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent22 -> int1: the Passamaquody does underquote Acheron but it does not approbate envoy.; sent2 -> int2: if the Passamaquody underquotes Acheron and does not approbate envoy it is a myna.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Passamaquody is a myna.; int3 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__