the hotbedness happens.
sent1: the hypoglycemicness does not occur if the dimming cloistered does not occur and the brotherliness does not occur. sent2: that the consultation does not occur is true. sent3: the dimming cloistered does not occur. sent4: the hotbedness but not the dimming cloistered occurs if the brotherliness occurs. sent5: if that the tricing pair does not occur hold the hypoglycemicness occurs and the isolation happens. sent6: the operation does not occur and the dimming cloistered does not occur if the brotherliness happens. sent7: if that the hypoglycemicness occurs is correct then the back-channelness does not occur. sent8: both the non-interdisciplinariness and the ambassadorialness happens. sent9: if not the spectroscopy but the walkabout happens the awainess does not occur. sent10: the brotherliness and the hotbedness occurs if the osculation does not occur. sent11: if both the non-hypoglycemicness and the isolation occurs the hotbedness does not occur. sent12: the dimming Missoula does not occur. sent13: the recombinant does not occur. sent14: the uneventfulness and the basilicanness happens. sent15: the brotherliness does not occur. sent16: the isolation occurs.
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: the dimming cloistered does not occur and the brotherliness does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hypoglycemicness does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: not the hypoglycemicness but the isolation occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the hotbedness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the hotbedness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the hypoglycemicness does not occur if the dimming cloistered does not occur and the brotherliness does not occur. sent2: that the consultation does not occur is true. sent3: the dimming cloistered does not occur. sent4: the hotbedness but not the dimming cloistered occurs if the brotherliness occurs. sent5: if that the tricing pair does not occur hold the hypoglycemicness occurs and the isolation happens. sent6: the operation does not occur and the dimming cloistered does not occur if the brotherliness happens. sent7: if that the hypoglycemicness occurs is correct then the back-channelness does not occur. sent8: both the non-interdisciplinariness and the ambassadorialness happens. sent9: if not the spectroscopy but the walkabout happens the awainess does not occur. sent10: the brotherliness and the hotbedness occurs if the osculation does not occur. sent11: if both the non-hypoglycemicness and the isolation occurs the hotbedness does not occur. sent12: the dimming Missoula does not occur. sent13: the recombinant does not occur. sent14: the uneventfulness and the basilicanness happens. sent15: the brotherliness does not occur. sent16: the isolation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent15 -> int1: the dimming cloistered does not occur and the brotherliness does not occur.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the hypoglycemicness does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: not the hypoglycemicness but the isolation occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__