if the lahar occurs then the asymptoticness occurs.
sent1: that the exiting happens is caused by the underquoting. sent2: the flocking Willis occurs. sent3: the issue and the interreflection occurs. sent4: the wreck does not occur if the interreflection occurs. sent5: the coup happens. sent6: the fact that the lahar happens hold if the exiting and the flocking tablemate occurs. sent7: the wreck does not occur. sent8: that the halo and the flocking tablemate happens is brought about by that the exit does not occur. sent9: the issue happens. sent10: the fact that the underquoting does not occur and the tour occurs does not hold. sent11: that the asymptoticness occurs is brought about by that the flocking tablemate does not occur and the injection does not occur. sent12: if the interreflection occurs then the injection does not occur and the wrecking does not occur. sent13: the exit occurs if the fact that the fact that not the underquoting but the tour occurs hold is false. sent14: that the lahar does not occur is right if both the exiting and the flocking tablemate occurs. sent15: the fact that the injection but not the lahar happens does not hold if the asymptoticness does not occur.
sent13 & sent10 -> int1: the exit occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the flocking tablemate occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the exit happens and the flocking tablemate happens.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the lahar does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lahar happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the flocking tablemate does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: the interreflection occurs.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the injection does not occur and the wreck does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the injection does not occur.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the flocking tablemate does not occur and the injection does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: that the asymptoticness occurs hold.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the halo occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the lahar occurs then the asymptoticness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the exiting happens is caused by the underquoting. sent2: the flocking Willis occurs. sent3: the issue and the interreflection occurs. sent4: the wreck does not occur if the interreflection occurs. sent5: the coup happens. sent6: the fact that the lahar happens hold if the exiting and the flocking tablemate occurs. sent7: the wreck does not occur. sent8: that the halo and the flocking tablemate happens is brought about by that the exit does not occur. sent9: the issue happens. sent10: the fact that the underquoting does not occur and the tour occurs does not hold. sent11: that the asymptoticness occurs is brought about by that the flocking tablemate does not occur and the injection does not occur. sent12: if the interreflection occurs then the injection does not occur and the wrecking does not occur. sent13: the exit occurs if the fact that the fact that not the underquoting but the tour occurs hold is false. sent14: that the lahar does not occur is right if both the exiting and the flocking tablemate occurs. sent15: the fact that the injection but not the lahar happens does not hold if the asymptoticness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent10 -> int1: the exit occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the flocking tablemate occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the exit happens and the flocking tablemate happens.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the lahar does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lahar happens.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the flocking tablemate does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: the interreflection occurs.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the injection does not occur and the wreck does not occur.; int7 -> int8: the injection does not occur.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the flocking tablemate does not occur and the injection does not occur.; int9 & sent11 -> int10: that the asymptoticness occurs hold.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__