the palace is a poppy.
sent1: if there is something such that that it promises Sapir is correct then the palace is a kind of a poppy. sent2: if something does jam sayeret then that it is feverish and it is not a fakery is not right. sent3: if something is a kosher it does promise mesoderm. sent4: something is a uprightness but it does not promise Sapir. sent5: the sugi is unfruitful. sent6: if the fact that the vest does jam midst is not false the cottonwood jams sayeret. sent7: that the sugi is a kind of a uprightness but it does not promise Sapir is false if the fact that the individualist is unfruitful is right. sent8: that there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a schlemiel that is not quartan is incorrect is not wrong. sent9: if something promises mesoderm the fact that it is not aeronautical and it is unfruitful is incorrect. sent10: if the individualist is unfruitful then the fact that the sugi is a uprightness and promises Sapir does not hold. sent11: the individualist is a kosher if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a hippie and not a kosher does not hold. sent12: if the sugi is a kosher the individualist is non-aeronautical or does not promise mesoderm or both. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a uprightness and it does not promise Sapir is incorrect then the palace is a poppy. sent14: the fact that the sugi is a uprightness that does promise Sapir is not right. sent15: the sugi is a poppy. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a schlemiel and is not a kind of a quartan is not true then the fact that the vest does jam midst hold. sent17: the elution is a kind of a fakery if there is something such that the fact that it is feverish and it is not a fakery is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the sugi is not a hippie and not a kosher is not correct if the casket is carpetbag. sent19: the march is unfruitful. sent20: there exists something such that that it is a uprightness and does promise Sapir is not true. sent21: the casket is a carpetbag if that the elution is a fakery is correct. sent22: the individualist is unfruitful.
sent7 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the sugi is a uprightness but it does not promise Sapir is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a uprightness and it does not promise Sapir is incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the palace is not a kind of a poppy.
sent9 -> int3: if the individualist does promise mesoderm the fact that it is not aeronautical and is unfruitful is wrong.; sent3 -> int4: the individualist does promise mesoderm if it is a kosher.; sent2 -> int5: if the cottonwood does jam sayeret then that it is feverish and not a fakery is wrong.; sent8 & sent16 -> int6: the vest does jam midst.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the cottonwood jams sayeret is not false.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the cottonwood is feverish but it is not a fakery is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that the fact that it is feverish and not a fakery does not hold.; int9 & sent17 -> int10: that the elution is a kind of a fakery hold.; sent21 & int10 -> int11: the casket is a carpetbag.; sent18 & int11 -> int12: that the sugi is not a hippie and it is not a kosher is incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a hippie and it is not a kind of a kosher does not hold.; int13 & sent11 -> int14: the individualist is a kind of a kosher.; int4 & int14 -> int15: the individualist does promise mesoderm.; int3 & int15 -> int16: that the individualist is both non-aeronautical and unfruitful does not hold.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that that it is not aeronautical and it is unfruitful does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the palace is a poppy. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that it promises Sapir is correct then the palace is a kind of a poppy. sent2: if something does jam sayeret then that it is feverish and it is not a fakery is not right. sent3: if something is a kosher it does promise mesoderm. sent4: something is a uprightness but it does not promise Sapir. sent5: the sugi is unfruitful. sent6: if the fact that the vest does jam midst is not false the cottonwood jams sayeret. sent7: that the sugi is a kind of a uprightness but it does not promise Sapir is false if the fact that the individualist is unfruitful is right. sent8: that there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a schlemiel that is not quartan is incorrect is not wrong. sent9: if something promises mesoderm the fact that it is not aeronautical and it is unfruitful is incorrect. sent10: if the individualist is unfruitful then the fact that the sugi is a uprightness and promises Sapir does not hold. sent11: the individualist is a kosher if there is something such that the fact that it is both not a hippie and not a kosher does not hold. sent12: if the sugi is a kosher the individualist is non-aeronautical or does not promise mesoderm or both. sent13: if there exists something such that that it is a uprightness and it does not promise Sapir is incorrect then the palace is a poppy. sent14: the fact that the sugi is a uprightness that does promise Sapir is not right. sent15: the sugi is a poppy. sent16: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a schlemiel and is not a kind of a quartan is not true then the fact that the vest does jam midst hold. sent17: the elution is a kind of a fakery if there is something such that the fact that it is feverish and it is not a fakery is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the sugi is not a hippie and not a kosher is not correct if the casket is carpetbag. sent19: the march is unfruitful. sent20: there exists something such that that it is a uprightness and does promise Sapir is not true. sent21: the casket is a carpetbag if that the elution is a fakery is correct. sent22: the individualist is unfruitful. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the sugi is a uprightness but it does not promise Sapir is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is a uprightness and it does not promise Sapir is incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__