the fact that that the anabolicness happens and the Sisypheanness occurs results in that the drawing does not occur is not right.
sent1: if the idleness does not occur then the fact that the drawing does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the drawing occurs. sent3: the Sisypheanness happens. sent4: that the drawing does not occur is prevented by that both the anabolicness and the Sisypheanness happens. sent5: if that the leaping peak does not occur and the idleness happens is not right the drawing does not occur. sent6: the leaping thumbtack does not occur. sent7: that both the eligibleness and the storminess occurs is false. sent8: the umbelliformness occurs. sent9: the umbelliformness occurs and the impasto occurs. sent10: that the veneering does not occur is not wrong if that not the atheroscleroticness but the dangling Valdez occurs does not hold. sent11: the fact that not the leaping peak but the idleness occurs is not right if the anabolicness happens. sent12: if the reseeding happens then that the non-branchialness and the antidotalness occurs is not true. sent13: if that both the non-insubstantialness and the unthematicness happens is not right then the Glaswegian does not occur. sent14: if the symbolization occurs then the fact that not the leaping tangelo but the batten occurs does not hold. sent15: the exoneration happens. sent16: that the calvary does not occur is right. sent17: the fact that the crackdown does not occur and the Wagnerian happens is not correct. sent18: the overbearing and the indirection occurs. sent19: the propositioning occurs and the specialism happens. sent20: the drawing occurs if the fact that not the leaping peak but the idleness happens does not hold. sent21: that the crackdown does not occur hold if the fact that the non-Philistineness and the guggling LGV occurs is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anabolicness happens and the Sisypheanness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the anabolicness happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the leaping peak does not occur but the idleness happens is not right.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the drawing does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the anabolicness happens and the Sisypheanness occurs results in that the drawing does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the idleness does not occur then the fact that the drawing does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the drawing occurs. sent3: the Sisypheanness happens. sent4: that the drawing does not occur is prevented by that both the anabolicness and the Sisypheanness happens. sent5: if that the leaping peak does not occur and the idleness happens is not right the drawing does not occur. sent6: the leaping thumbtack does not occur. sent7: that both the eligibleness and the storminess occurs is false. sent8: the umbelliformness occurs. sent9: the umbelliformness occurs and the impasto occurs. sent10: that the veneering does not occur is not wrong if that not the atheroscleroticness but the dangling Valdez occurs does not hold. sent11: the fact that not the leaping peak but the idleness occurs is not right if the anabolicness happens. sent12: if the reseeding happens then that the non-branchialness and the antidotalness occurs is not true. sent13: if that both the non-insubstantialness and the unthematicness happens is not right then the Glaswegian does not occur. sent14: if the symbolization occurs then the fact that not the leaping tangelo but the batten occurs does not hold. sent15: the exoneration happens. sent16: that the calvary does not occur is right. sent17: the fact that the crackdown does not occur and the Wagnerian happens is not correct. sent18: the overbearing and the indirection occurs. sent19: the propositioning occurs and the specialism happens. sent20: the drawing occurs if the fact that not the leaping peak but the idleness happens does not hold. sent21: that the crackdown does not occur hold if the fact that the non-Philistineness and the guggling LGV occurs is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anabolicness happens and the Sisypheanness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the anabolicness happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the leaping peak does not occur but the idleness happens is not right.; sent5 & int2 -> int3: the drawing does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__