the fact that the spouse is not non-Panamanian or acrogenic or both is incorrect.
sent1: if something does not axe Scorpaenidae it books and axes F.I.S.C.. sent2: something that does back axes dolphinfish. sent3: if something is a book then it is a Panamanian. sent4: if the esker does instruct hamate then it is a Bacon. sent5: if something commiserates chemical then it axes dolphinfish. sent6: if something is a Bacon then the fact that either the Centre is a kind of a intelligibility or it does not instruct dictate or both is not correct. sent7: if there is something such that it does axe dolphinfish and it is teratogenic then the scalp does not axe Scorpaenidae. sent8: if the esker does instruct kumquat it is a Bacon. sent9: something is a meanness if it is a book. sent10: that the provincial is not a inhumaneness hold. sent11: the esker instructs hamate or instructs kumquat or both. sent12: the spouse does axe F.I.S.C.. sent13: the spouse is a country. sent14: the fact that the hometown does not stuff and does instruct spot-welder is false if there is something such that it does not instruct spot-welder. sent15: the spouse is a book and/or it is a demonization. sent16: that the pyrometer does not instruct spot-welder is not wrong if the fact that it does instruct spot-welder and does not instruct counterpoint is not true. sent17: something is teratogenic if the fact that it is not a stuff and it instructs spot-welder is wrong. sent18: if the Centre is not geophysical the hometown commiserates chemical and/or it is a backed. sent19: the fact that the pyrometer does instruct spot-welder and does not instruct counterpoint is not correct if the provincial is not a kind of a inhumaneness. sent20: The F.I.S.C. does axe spouse. sent21: the spouse books if it does axe F.I.S.C.. sent22: if that either something is a intelligibility or it does not instruct dictate or both is false then it is not geophysical.
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: the spouse is a book.; sent3 -> int2: if the spouse does book then it is Panamanian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the spouse is a Panamanian.; int3 -> hypothesis;
that either the spouse is Panamanian or it is not non-acrogenic or both does not hold.
sent1 -> int4: if the fact that the scalp does not axe Scorpaenidae is not false it is a kind of a book and it does axe F.I.S.C..; sent22 -> int5: the Centre is not geophysical if the fact that the fact that either it is a intelligibility or it does not instruct dictate or both is not wrong is incorrect.; sent11 & sent4 & sent8 -> int6: the esker is a Bacon.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a Bacon.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the fact that either the Centre is a intelligibility or it does not instruct dictate or both does not hold.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the Centre is not geophysical.; sent18 & int9 -> int10: either the hometown does commiserate chemical or it does back or both.; sent5 -> int11: the hometown axes dolphinfish if it does commiserate chemical.; sent2 -> int12: the hometown does axe dolphinfish if it is backed.; int10 & int11 & int12 -> int13: the hometown axes dolphinfish.; sent17 -> int14: the hometown is teratogenic if that it does not stuff and instructs spot-welder does not hold.; sent19 & sent10 -> int15: the fact that the pyrometer does instruct spot-welder but it does not instruct counterpoint is not true.; sent16 & int15 -> int16: the pyrometer does not instruct spot-welder.; int16 -> int17: something does not instruct spot-welder.; int17 & sent14 -> int18: that the hometown is not a stuff but it does instruct spot-welder is incorrect.; int14 & int18 -> int19: that the hometown is teratogenic is right.; int13 & int19 -> int20: the hometown does axe dolphinfish and it is teratogenic.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that it axes dolphinfish and it is teratogenic.; int21 & sent7 -> int22: the scalp does not axe Scorpaenidae.; int4 & int22 -> int23: the scalp does book and it does axe F.I.S.C..; int23 -> int24: the fact that the scalp axes F.I.S.C. is not wrong.; int24 -> int25: there exists something such that it axes F.I.S.C..;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the spouse is not non-Panamanian or acrogenic or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not axe Scorpaenidae it books and axes F.I.S.C.. sent2: something that does back axes dolphinfish. sent3: if something is a book then it is a Panamanian. sent4: if the esker does instruct hamate then it is a Bacon. sent5: if something commiserates chemical then it axes dolphinfish. sent6: if something is a Bacon then the fact that either the Centre is a kind of a intelligibility or it does not instruct dictate or both is not correct. sent7: if there is something such that it does axe dolphinfish and it is teratogenic then the scalp does not axe Scorpaenidae. sent8: if the esker does instruct kumquat it is a Bacon. sent9: something is a meanness if it is a book. sent10: that the provincial is not a inhumaneness hold. sent11: the esker instructs hamate or instructs kumquat or both. sent12: the spouse does axe F.I.S.C.. sent13: the spouse is a country. sent14: the fact that the hometown does not stuff and does instruct spot-welder is false if there is something such that it does not instruct spot-welder. sent15: the spouse is a book and/or it is a demonization. sent16: that the pyrometer does not instruct spot-welder is not wrong if the fact that it does instruct spot-welder and does not instruct counterpoint is not true. sent17: something is teratogenic if the fact that it is not a stuff and it instructs spot-welder is wrong. sent18: if the Centre is not geophysical the hometown commiserates chemical and/or it is a backed. sent19: the fact that the pyrometer does instruct spot-welder and does not instruct counterpoint is not correct if the provincial is not a kind of a inhumaneness. sent20: The F.I.S.C. does axe spouse. sent21: the spouse books if it does axe F.I.S.C.. sent22: if that either something is a intelligibility or it does not instruct dictate or both is false then it is not geophysical. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: the spouse is a book.; sent3 -> int2: if the spouse does book then it is Panamanian.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the spouse is a Panamanian.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__