that the paternalness occurs if the nonreversibleness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the postmodernistness happens and the three-wheelness occurs. sent2: if the fact that the Marianness and the non-millenarianness happens is not right the check-in occurs. sent3: if the Swaziness does not occur the fact that the melanizing belle but not the alopecicness occurs is not correct. sent4: either that the drunkenness does not occur or that the Swaziness does not occur or both yields that the abating does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the actinomorphicness but not the finger-roll happens is wrong then the unfairness happens. sent6: the disparagement happens. sent7: that the drunkenness occurs and the Swazi occurs causes the nonreversibleness. sent8: the fact that the fact that the postmodernistness happens hold if the fact that the velarness but not the relaying happens is false hold. sent9: the fact that both the Concord and the non-orthotropousness happens is incorrect. sent10: the ctenoidness prevents that the newspapering does not occur. sent11: that both the alopecicness and the nonreversibleness happens prevents the drunkenness. sent12: the pandering does not occur and/or the Swazi does not occur if the drunkenness does not occur. sent13: that both the drunkenness and the Swazi occurs brings about that the nonreversibleness does not occur. sent14: the paternalness occurs if the alopecicness occurs. sent15: the fact that the melanizing belle and the alopecicness occurs does not hold if the Swaziness does not occur. sent16: that the paternalness occurs hold if that the melanizing belle but not the alopecicness happens does not hold. sent17: that the pandering does not occur or the non-Swaziness or both triggers that the pandering does not occur. sent18: the duplication does not occur. sent19: the drunkenness happens. sent20: the fact that the melanizing belle occurs and the alopecicness occurs is false.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonreversibleness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Swaziness happens.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the drunkenness occurs and the Swazi occurs is not false.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the nonreversibleness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Swaziness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: that both the melanizing belle and the non-alopecicness happens is not correct.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the paternalness occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the abating does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the paternalness occurs if the nonreversibleness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the postmodernistness happens and the three-wheelness occurs. sent2: if the fact that the Marianness and the non-millenarianness happens is not right the check-in occurs. sent3: if the Swaziness does not occur the fact that the melanizing belle but not the alopecicness occurs is not correct. sent4: either that the drunkenness does not occur or that the Swaziness does not occur or both yields that the abating does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the actinomorphicness but not the finger-roll happens is wrong then the unfairness happens. sent6: the disparagement happens. sent7: that the drunkenness occurs and the Swazi occurs causes the nonreversibleness. sent8: the fact that the fact that the postmodernistness happens hold if the fact that the velarness but not the relaying happens is false hold. sent9: the fact that both the Concord and the non-orthotropousness happens is incorrect. sent10: the ctenoidness prevents that the newspapering does not occur. sent11: that both the alopecicness and the nonreversibleness happens prevents the drunkenness. sent12: the pandering does not occur and/or the Swazi does not occur if the drunkenness does not occur. sent13: that both the drunkenness and the Swazi occurs brings about that the nonreversibleness does not occur. sent14: the paternalness occurs if the alopecicness occurs. sent15: the fact that the melanizing belle and the alopecicness occurs does not hold if the Swaziness does not occur. sent16: that the paternalness occurs hold if that the melanizing belle but not the alopecicness happens does not hold. sent17: that the pandering does not occur or the non-Swaziness or both triggers that the pandering does not occur. sent18: the duplication does not occur. sent19: the drunkenness happens. sent20: the fact that the melanizing belle occurs and the alopecicness occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the nonreversibleness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Swaziness happens.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the drunkenness occurs and the Swazi occurs is not false.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the nonreversibleness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Swaziness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: that both the melanizing belle and the non-alopecicness happens is not correct.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the paternalness occurs.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__