the consigner is a kind of a antinomy.
sent1: something is a kind of a Romanian if it is chitinous. sent2: if the arame is costal and it is tamed then it is not a antinomianism. sent3: the arame is costal if a superscript thing overawes Hirundo. sent4: the fact that the arame is a Pristidae but it is not a quad is correct if it is not a antinomianism. sent5: something is not a antinomy if it is a superscript and it does not overawe Hirundo. sent6: the forebear overawes autoplasty if the goody-goody does not overawes autoplasty but it does negate century. sent7: something does not tag Haematoxylum if it does overawe autoplasty. sent8: something does not overawe autoplasty but it negates century if it is a kind of a Romanian. sent9: that either the manic-depressive is not a Pristidae or it is anagogic or both is not correct if there exists something such that the fact that it does not tag Haematoxylum is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the consigner is not a quad is not wrong. sent11: if the arame is not costal the consigner is a superscript but it does not overawe Hirundo. sent12: the goody-goody is chitinous. sent13: the arame is not costal if the Arapaho is not tamed and/or it is a antinomianism. sent14: if the consigner is a antinomy and it is a antinomianism it is not a Pristidae. sent15: if the arame is not a superscript then the gale is a swallow that is not unstable. sent16: something is not superscript and it does not overawe Hirundo if it is not costal. sent17: the arame is a Pristidae if it is not a antinomianism. sent18: the cere is a kind of a superscript and it overawes Hirundo. sent19: the arame does tame.
sent18 -> int1: something is a kind of a superscript that overawes Hirundo.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the arame is costal.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the arame is both costal and tamed.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the arame is not a antinomianism.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the arame is a Pristidae but it is not a kind of a quad.;
the consigner is not a kind of a antinomy.
sent5 -> int6: if the fact that the consigner is a kind of a superscript and does not overawe Hirundo is right then it is not a antinomy.; sent7 -> int7: that the forebear does not tag Haematoxylum is not incorrect if it does overawe autoplasty.; sent8 -> int8: if the goody-goody is a Romanian it does not overawe autoplasty and does negate century.; sent1 -> int9: the goody-goody is Romanian if it is chitinous.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the goody-goody is a Romanian.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the goody-goody does not overawe autoplasty but it does negate century.; sent6 & int11 -> int12: the forebear overawes autoplasty.; int7 & int12 -> int13: that the forebear does not tag Haematoxylum is true.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it does not tag Haematoxylum.; int14 & sent9 -> int15: that the manic-depressive is either not a Pristidae or anagogic or both does not hold.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that that it is not a Pristidae or is anagogic or both is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the consigner is a kind of a antinomy. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of a Romanian if it is chitinous. sent2: if the arame is costal and it is tamed then it is not a antinomianism. sent3: the arame is costal if a superscript thing overawes Hirundo. sent4: the fact that the arame is a Pristidae but it is not a quad is correct if it is not a antinomianism. sent5: something is not a antinomy if it is a superscript and it does not overawe Hirundo. sent6: the forebear overawes autoplasty if the goody-goody does not overawes autoplasty but it does negate century. sent7: something does not tag Haematoxylum if it does overawe autoplasty. sent8: something does not overawe autoplasty but it negates century if it is a kind of a Romanian. sent9: that either the manic-depressive is not a Pristidae or it is anagogic or both is not correct if there exists something such that the fact that it does not tag Haematoxylum is not wrong. sent10: the fact that the consigner is not a quad is not wrong. sent11: if the arame is not costal the consigner is a superscript but it does not overawe Hirundo. sent12: the goody-goody is chitinous. sent13: the arame is not costal if the Arapaho is not tamed and/or it is a antinomianism. sent14: if the consigner is a antinomy and it is a antinomianism it is not a Pristidae. sent15: if the arame is not a superscript then the gale is a swallow that is not unstable. sent16: something is not superscript and it does not overawe Hirundo if it is not costal. sent17: the arame is a Pristidae if it is not a antinomianism. sent18: the cere is a kind of a superscript and it overawes Hirundo. sent19: the arame does tame. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: something is a kind of a superscript that overawes Hirundo.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the arame is costal.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the arame is both costal and tamed.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the arame is not a antinomianism.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the arame is a Pristidae but it is not a kind of a quad.; __UNKNOWN__