that there exists something such that if it is not a Postimpressionist then the fact that it does not impersonate biogeography and is not likely is wrong is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a aleph-null then that it is not a daub and does not spiel hypochondrium is incorrect. sent2: that something does not unwrap Wilson and is not a Postimpressionist is false if it does not unwrap vow. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Orono then that it runs and it is not a kind of an admission is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is dysphoric is correct the fact that it is not normal and it is not a pig is not true. sent5: if the muon is a Postimpressionist then the fact that it does not impersonate clipboard and is not pubic is not true. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is not a Albion is true then that it is a kind of client-server thing that is not a kind of a Taichung is false. sent7: if the thoroughfare is not normal then the fact that it is vacuolate and it does not impersonate biogeography is not right. sent8: that the holystone does impersonate Carlsbad and is not a censure is not correct if it is not a kind of a Postimpressionist. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Postimpressionist is not false the fact that it does not impersonate biogeography and is unlikely does not hold. sent10: the fact that the muon does not impersonate biogeography and it is not likely is not correct if it is not a Postimpressionist.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
if the cuckoopint does not unwrap vow then that it does not unwrap Wilson and is not a Postimpressionist is incorrect.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a Postimpressionist then the fact that it does not impersonate biogeography and is not likely is wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is a kind of a aleph-null then that it is not a daub and does not spiel hypochondrium is incorrect. sent2: that something does not unwrap Wilson and is not a Postimpressionist is false if it does not unwrap vow. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not a Orono then that it runs and it is not a kind of an admission is incorrect. sent4: there exists something such that if that it is dysphoric is correct the fact that it is not normal and it is not a pig is not true. sent5: if the muon is a Postimpressionist then the fact that it does not impersonate clipboard and is not pubic is not true. sent6: there exists something such that if that it is not a Albion is true then that it is a kind of client-server thing that is not a kind of a Taichung is false. sent7: if the thoroughfare is not normal then the fact that it is vacuolate and it does not impersonate biogeography is not right. sent8: that the holystone does impersonate Carlsbad and is not a censure is not correct if it is not a kind of a Postimpressionist. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Postimpressionist is not false the fact that it does not impersonate biogeography and is unlikely does not hold. sent10: the fact that the muon does not impersonate biogeography and it is not likely is not correct if it is not a Postimpressionist. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__