if both the pecking alembic and the onstageness happens then that the nonspecificness does not occur is right.
sent1: the tunneling emulation occurs. sent2: the specificness is brought about by that the onstageness happens and the tunneling emulation occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pecking alembic and the onstageness occurs hold.; assump1 -> int1: the onstageness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the onstageness and the tunneling emulation occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the nonspecificness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if both the pecking alembic and the onstageness happens then that the nonspecificness does not occur is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the tunneling emulation occurs. sent2: the specificness is brought about by that the onstageness happens and the tunneling emulation occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the pecking alembic and the onstageness occurs hold.; assump1 -> int1: the onstageness occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the onstageness and the tunneling emulation occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the nonspecificness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__