the actin is not a twinkle.
sent1: if the actin is not technophobic then that it is a Veblen and is a timolol is right. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is epidemic and it is not a twinkle is not correct. sent3: either something is not alkaloidal or it is a platen or both if it is a Veblen. sent4: the highboard does dissemble jibboom and it is minty if it is not Sisyphean. sent5: the highboard is not Sisyphean. sent6: the radiogram is not a platen if there is something such that the fact that it is both not epidemic and not an environment is wrong. sent7: the radiogram is a platen if the fact that it is epidemic is not incorrect. sent8: that the radiogram is alkaloidal hold. sent9: the actin is a offside. sent10: the radiogram is a platen if it is alkaloidal. sent11: the jibboom is not a kind of a base if the fact that the radiogram is not a base but it twinkles is not right. sent12: the fact that something is both not a base and a twinkle does not hold if it is not tibial. sent13: if there is something such that it is not alkaloidal or it is a kind of a platen or both the jibboom does not pit. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a platen and not a twinkle is not true the actin is non-alkaloidal. sent15: the fact that if there exists something such that it dissembles jibboom the fact that the translator does not dissembles jibboom and is tibial is not right is not wrong. sent16: the radiogram is not tibial if that the fact that the translator does not dissemble jibboom and is tibial is right is wrong. sent17: if the jibboom is not a kind of an epidemic and it is not an environment the actin is a twinkle. sent18: the actin is not technophobic. sent19: there exists something such that that it is not a twinkle and is epidemic is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jibboom is not epidemic and is not an environment is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a kind of an epidemic and is not a kind of an environment does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the radiogram is not a platen.; sent10 & sent8 -> int3: the radiogram is a platen.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the jibboom is both not epidemic and not an environment.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the jibboom is not a pit and it is not a kind of a base.
sent3 -> int6: either the actin is not alkaloidal or it is a kind of a platen or both if it is a Veblen.; sent1 & sent18 -> int7: the actin is a Veblen and it is a timolol.; int7 -> int8: the actin is a kind of a Veblen.; int6 & int8 -> int9: either the actin is not alkaloidal or it is a kind of a platen or both.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that either it is not alkaloidal or it is a platen or both.; int10 & sent13 -> int11: the jibboom does not pit.; sent12 -> int12: the fact that the radiogram is not a kind of a base but it is a twinkle does not hold if it is not tibial.; sent4 & sent5 -> int13: the highboard dissembles jibboom and is minty.; int13 -> int14: that the highboard does dissemble jibboom is true.; int14 -> int15: something does dissemble jibboom.; int15 & sent15 -> int16: that the translator does not dissemble jibboom and is not non-tibial is false.; sent16 & int16 -> int17: the radiogram is not tibial.; int12 & int17 -> int18: the fact that that the radiogram is not a base but it is a twinkle is true is not correct.; sent11 & int18 -> int19: the jibboom is not a base.; int11 & int19 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the actin is not a twinkle. ; $context$ = sent1: if the actin is not technophobic then that it is a Veblen and is a timolol is right. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is epidemic and it is not a twinkle is not correct. sent3: either something is not alkaloidal or it is a platen or both if it is a Veblen. sent4: the highboard does dissemble jibboom and it is minty if it is not Sisyphean. sent5: the highboard is not Sisyphean. sent6: the radiogram is not a platen if there is something such that the fact that it is both not epidemic and not an environment is wrong. sent7: the radiogram is a platen if the fact that it is epidemic is not incorrect. sent8: that the radiogram is alkaloidal hold. sent9: the actin is a offside. sent10: the radiogram is a platen if it is alkaloidal. sent11: the jibboom is not a kind of a base if the fact that the radiogram is not a base but it twinkles is not right. sent12: the fact that something is both not a base and a twinkle does not hold if it is not tibial. sent13: if there is something such that it is not alkaloidal or it is a kind of a platen or both the jibboom does not pit. sent14: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a platen and not a twinkle is not true the actin is non-alkaloidal. sent15: the fact that if there exists something such that it dissembles jibboom the fact that the translator does not dissembles jibboom and is tibial is not right is not wrong. sent16: the radiogram is not tibial if that the fact that the translator does not dissemble jibboom and is tibial is right is wrong. sent17: if the jibboom is not a kind of an epidemic and it is not an environment the actin is a twinkle. sent18: the actin is not technophobic. sent19: there exists something such that that it is not a twinkle and is epidemic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the jibboom is not epidemic and is not an environment is not true.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a kind of an epidemic and is not a kind of an environment does not hold.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the radiogram is not a platen.; sent10 & sent8 -> int3: the radiogram is a platen.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the jibboom is both not epidemic and not an environment.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__