the sanctioning happens and the alchemisticness occurs if that the condemning ghostwriter does not occur is not incorrect.
sent1: that the gilding Balinese does not occur but the optimizing occurs does not hold. sent2: that the stabbing nitrate happens is brought about by that not the spiritualization but the intestinalness occurs. sent3: the fact that the taurineness occurs hold. sent4: the fact that the heavy-dutiness happens and the condemning ghostwriter happens does not hold if the taurine does not occur. sent5: the fact that that the taurine occurs and the condemning ghostwriter occurs is false is not wrong. sent6: the sanctioning happens if the fact that the taurine does not occur and the condemning ghostwriter happens is wrong. sent7: that both the gilding shrapnel and the point-of-saleness occurs is triggered by that the Cenozoic does not occur. sent8: that the sanction and the alchemisticness happens is brought about by that the condemning ghostwriter happens. sent9: the heavy-dutiness does not occur if the fact that both the heavy-dutiness and the condemning ghostwriter occurs is not true. sent10: if the gilding shrapnel happens then the alchemisticness does not occur but the sulphuricness happens.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the non-taurineness and the condemning ghostwriter happens.; assump2 -> int1: the condemning ghostwriter occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the condemning ghostwriter does not occur hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the taurineness does not occur and the condemning ghostwriter happens is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the sanction happens.;
the heavy-dutiness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the sanctioning happens and the alchemisticness occurs if that the condemning ghostwriter does not occur is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the gilding Balinese does not occur but the optimizing occurs does not hold. sent2: that the stabbing nitrate happens is brought about by that not the spiritualization but the intestinalness occurs. sent3: the fact that the taurineness occurs hold. sent4: the fact that the heavy-dutiness happens and the condemning ghostwriter happens does not hold if the taurine does not occur. sent5: the fact that that the taurine occurs and the condemning ghostwriter occurs is false is not wrong. sent6: the sanctioning happens if the fact that the taurine does not occur and the condemning ghostwriter happens is wrong. sent7: that both the gilding shrapnel and the point-of-saleness occurs is triggered by that the Cenozoic does not occur. sent8: that the sanction and the alchemisticness happens is brought about by that the condemning ghostwriter happens. sent9: the heavy-dutiness does not occur if the fact that both the heavy-dutiness and the condemning ghostwriter occurs is not true. sent10: if the gilding shrapnel happens then the alchemisticness does not occur but the sulphuricness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that both the non-taurineness and the condemning ghostwriter happens.; assump2 -> int1: the condemning ghostwriter occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the condemning ghostwriter does not occur hold.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: that the taurineness does not occur and the condemning ghostwriter happens is not right.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the sanction happens.; __UNKNOWN__