the drydock does squawk garnishee.
sent1: if the abyss is not ethnological and not constructive then the fortification is ethnological. sent2: something is a chloramine but it is not constructive. sent3: something is not a chloramine and is constructive. sent4: the abyss is a pool if it is constructive. sent5: the drydock is not a pool. sent6: there is something such that it is not constructive. sent7: if the abyss is ethnological then it does taper. sent8: if the fact that something squawks garnishee and is not a pool is wrong it does not squawks garnishee. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a chloramine and is not constructive then the drydock squawks garnishee. sent10: the abyss is not a chloramine. sent11: if the drydock is a chloramine that it is both not a pool and a taper does not hold. sent12: that the abyss is ethnological is true if that it is a pool is not false. sent13: the abyss is not a pool if that the drydock is not a pool but it tapers is not correct. sent14: the abyss is a kind of a cayuse if it does squawk garnishee. sent15: the abyss is not a taper.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abyss is constructive.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the abyss pools.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the abyss is ethnological.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the abyss is a taper.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the abyss is not constructive.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the abyss is not a kind of a chloramine and it is not constructive.; int6 -> int7: something is not a chloramine and not constructive.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the drydock does not squawk garnishee.
sent8 -> int8: the fact that the drydock does not squawk garnishee hold if the fact that it does squawk garnishee and it is not a kind of a pool is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the drydock does squawk garnishee. ; $context$ = sent1: if the abyss is not ethnological and not constructive then the fortification is ethnological. sent2: something is a chloramine but it is not constructive. sent3: something is not a chloramine and is constructive. sent4: the abyss is a pool if it is constructive. sent5: the drydock is not a pool. sent6: there is something such that it is not constructive. sent7: if the abyss is ethnological then it does taper. sent8: if the fact that something squawks garnishee and is not a pool is wrong it does not squawks garnishee. sent9: if there exists something such that it is not a chloramine and is not constructive then the drydock squawks garnishee. sent10: the abyss is not a chloramine. sent11: if the drydock is a chloramine that it is both not a pool and a taper does not hold. sent12: that the abyss is ethnological is true if that it is a pool is not false. sent13: the abyss is not a pool if that the drydock is not a pool but it tapers is not correct. sent14: the abyss is a kind of a cayuse if it does squawk garnishee. sent15: the abyss is not a taper. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abyss is constructive.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the abyss pools.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the abyss is ethnological.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the abyss is a taper.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the abyss is not constructive.; int5 & sent10 -> int6: the abyss is not a kind of a chloramine and it is not constructive.; int6 -> int7: something is not a chloramine and not constructive.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__