that the depth does not launch sophomore and does not flabbergast malcontent is not right.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is a clinch then the trembles is either a Falstaff or not postictal or both. sent2: that if the dendrobium is a kurus the shipping does flabbergast malcontent is true. sent3: if something does not flabbergast malcontent it is unsalable. sent4: the depth does not launch sophomore. sent5: if the shipping flabbergasts malcontent the depth does not launch sophomore. sent6: if the trembles is not postictal the depth is a kind of a clinch and it is a kind of a Falstaff. sent7: the trembles is a Falstaff or it is postictal or both. sent8: the trembles is a Falstaff or it is postictal or both if there is something such that it is a clinch. sent9: if the shipping does flabbergast malcontent then the depth does not launch sophomore and it does not flabbergast malcontent. sent10: there is something such that it does clinch. sent11: the trembles does not launch sophomore if the depth does flabbergast malcontent and/or it is not postictal. sent12: the dendrobium is not resolute if the trembles is not postictal. sent13: the fact that the dendrobium is the kurus if the dendrobium is not resolute hold. sent14: the fact that something does not launch sophomore and it does not flabbergast malcontent is not correct if it is a clinch. sent15: the dendrobium is not resolute if the trembles is a Falstaff or not postictal or both.
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the trembles is either a Falstaff or not postictal or both.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the dendrobium is not resolute.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the dendrobium is a kind of a kurus.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the shipping does flabbergast malcontent.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the shipping is unsalable if it does not flabbergast malcontent.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the depth does not launch sophomore and does not flabbergast malcontent is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is a clinch then the trembles is either a Falstaff or not postictal or both. sent2: that if the dendrobium is a kurus the shipping does flabbergast malcontent is true. sent3: if something does not flabbergast malcontent it is unsalable. sent4: the depth does not launch sophomore. sent5: if the shipping flabbergasts malcontent the depth does not launch sophomore. sent6: if the trembles is not postictal the depth is a kind of a clinch and it is a kind of a Falstaff. sent7: the trembles is a Falstaff or it is postictal or both. sent8: the trembles is a Falstaff or it is postictal or both if there is something such that it is a clinch. sent9: if the shipping does flabbergast malcontent then the depth does not launch sophomore and it does not flabbergast malcontent. sent10: there is something such that it does clinch. sent11: the trembles does not launch sophomore if the depth does flabbergast malcontent and/or it is not postictal. sent12: the dendrobium is not resolute if the trembles is not postictal. sent13: the fact that the dendrobium is the kurus if the dendrobium is not resolute hold. sent14: the fact that something does not launch sophomore and it does not flabbergast malcontent is not correct if it is a clinch. sent15: the dendrobium is not resolute if the trembles is a Falstaff or not postictal or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent1 -> int1: the trembles is either a Falstaff or not postictal or both.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the dendrobium is not resolute.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the dendrobium is a kind of a kurus.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the shipping does flabbergast malcontent.; int4 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__