the fact that there is something such that if it is not a communication and it is not tubeless then it is not micropylar is not incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a conditionality and it is not a kind of a duplication it is not a stiff. sent2: if something is non-sustainable but not non-naturistic it does not sever. sent3: that if something does not harden physostigmine and it does not restart smew it is not a kind of a layered is correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a communication and it is not a tubeless then it is micropylar. sent5: if something that is not heavenly is a kind of a stockpile it is not unrighteous. sent6: if the stockinet is a kind of non-autotrophic thing that is not a communication it is not bimorphemic. sent7: the stockinet is a communication if it is not bipolar and does not include oxalate. sent8: something is not vice-presidential if it is not a jitteriness and it restarts Nina. sent9: if something does not harden Montgolfier and it is not a Ceratopogonidae it is not paramagnetic. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a casing but a resettlement it does not harden Alca. sent11: if something does not trace but it is trochaic then the fact that it is not a Ismaili is correct. sent12: if something is not a communication and is not tubeless then it is micropylar. sent13: if something is a workroom and is not offstage it is not zenithal. sent14: if the stockinet is not diocesan and it is not a Stalinist then it is a kind of a communication. sent15: the stockinet is not micropylar if it is not a communication and it is a tubeless. sent16: there is something such that if it is not optative and it is not a jitteriness it is not a deco. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a bridle and it is not a kind of a xenotransplant it does not include Alca.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not a communication and it is not tubeless then it is not micropylar is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a conditionality and it is not a kind of a duplication it is not a stiff. sent2: if something is non-sustainable but not non-naturistic it does not sever. sent3: that if something does not harden physostigmine and it does not restart smew it is not a kind of a layered is correct. sent4: there is something such that if it is not a communication and it is not a tubeless then it is micropylar. sent5: if something that is not heavenly is a kind of a stockpile it is not unrighteous. sent6: if the stockinet is a kind of non-autotrophic thing that is not a communication it is not bimorphemic. sent7: the stockinet is a communication if it is not bipolar and does not include oxalate. sent8: something is not vice-presidential if it is not a jitteriness and it restarts Nina. sent9: if something does not harden Montgolfier and it is not a Ceratopogonidae it is not paramagnetic. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a casing but a resettlement it does not harden Alca. sent11: if something does not trace but it is trochaic then the fact that it is not a Ismaili is correct. sent12: if something is not a communication and is not tubeless then it is micropylar. sent13: if something is a workroom and is not offstage it is not zenithal. sent14: if the stockinet is not diocesan and it is not a Stalinist then it is a kind of a communication. sent15: the stockinet is not micropylar if it is not a communication and it is a tubeless. sent16: there is something such that if it is not optative and it is not a jitteriness it is not a deco. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a bridle and it is not a kind of a xenotransplant it does not include Alca. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__