the cuirass is not lumbosacral and it is not a kind of a nor'-nor'-west if the fact that the bull's-eye is a choker is not false.
sent1: the harvester is a Verbenaceae if the savoy includes bearer and is not a Pteropus. sent2: the cuirass is not lumbosacral. sent3: the fact that the Potemkin is a cover if there exists something such that that it is not Soviets and/or it is not rhetorical is incorrect is not false. sent4: if the harvester is not a Arianism then the cuirass is a kind of non-lumbosacral thing that is not a nor'-nor'-west. sent5: something relapses. sent6: if that the fact that the cuirass does not restart Superior and is not a Nicotiana does not hold is correct the bull's-eye is not a kind of a Arianism. sent7: the savoy does include bearer but it is not a Pteropus if the fact that it is a bacca is right. sent8: if that the cuirass is not a kind of a Arianism hold then the bull's-eye is not a nor'-nor'-west and not unrhetorical. sent9: the cuirass is not lumbosacral if the bull's-eye is a choker. sent10: if the bull's-eye is a choker it is unrhetorical. sent11: if the savoy is not areolar then it is a kind of a bacca that is a electroencephalograph. sent12: if something is a Verbenaceae it is both not a nor'-nor'-west and lumbosacral. sent13: if the cephaloglycin is not a kind of an exhibitor and is not areolar then the savoy is not areolar. sent14: there exists something such that it is a Arianism. sent15: the cephaloglycin is not an exhibitor and is not areolar. sent16: the harvester is not a Arianism if there are unrhetorical and Soviets things. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a nor'-nor'-west and is lumbosacral then the Potemkin is a choker. sent18: if something is not a kind of a Arianism then that it is non-Soviets or it is unrhetorical or both is incorrect. sent19: if there is something such that it is not a Verbenaceae and restarts Superior then that the bull's-eye is Soviets hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bull's-eye is a kind of a choker.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the bull's-eye is unrhetorical.;
the Potemkin is a kind of a cover that is a choker.
sent18 -> int2: that the bull's-eye is either not Soviets or unrhetorical or both is not true if it is not a Arianism.; sent12 -> int3: if the harvester is a Verbenaceae it is not a nor'-nor'-west and is lumbosacral.; sent13 & sent15 -> int4: the savoy is non-areolar.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: that the savoy is a bacca that is a electroencephalograph hold.; int5 -> int6: the savoy is a kind of a bacca.; sent7 & int6 -> int7: the savoy does include bearer but it is not a kind of a Pteropus.; sent1 & int7 -> int8: the harvester is a kind of a Verbenaceae.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the harvester is not a nor'-nor'-west but it is lumbosacral.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is not a kind of a nor'-nor'-west and it is lumbosacral.; int10 & sent17 -> int11: the Potemkin is a kind of a choker.;
$hypothesis$ = the cuirass is not lumbosacral and it is not a kind of a nor'-nor'-west if the fact that the bull's-eye is a choker is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the harvester is a Verbenaceae if the savoy includes bearer and is not a Pteropus. sent2: the cuirass is not lumbosacral. sent3: the fact that the Potemkin is a cover if there exists something such that that it is not Soviets and/or it is not rhetorical is incorrect is not false. sent4: if the harvester is not a Arianism then the cuirass is a kind of non-lumbosacral thing that is not a nor'-nor'-west. sent5: something relapses. sent6: if that the fact that the cuirass does not restart Superior and is not a Nicotiana does not hold is correct the bull's-eye is not a kind of a Arianism. sent7: the savoy does include bearer but it is not a Pteropus if the fact that it is a bacca is right. sent8: if that the cuirass is not a kind of a Arianism hold then the bull's-eye is not a nor'-nor'-west and not unrhetorical. sent9: the cuirass is not lumbosacral if the bull's-eye is a choker. sent10: if the bull's-eye is a choker it is unrhetorical. sent11: if the savoy is not areolar then it is a kind of a bacca that is a electroencephalograph. sent12: if something is a Verbenaceae it is both not a nor'-nor'-west and lumbosacral. sent13: if the cephaloglycin is not a kind of an exhibitor and is not areolar then the savoy is not areolar. sent14: there exists something such that it is a Arianism. sent15: the cephaloglycin is not an exhibitor and is not areolar. sent16: the harvester is not a Arianism if there are unrhetorical and Soviets things. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a nor'-nor'-west and is lumbosacral then the Potemkin is a choker. sent18: if something is not a kind of a Arianism then that it is non-Soviets or it is unrhetorical or both is incorrect. sent19: if there is something such that it is not a Verbenaceae and restarts Superior then that the bull's-eye is Soviets hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bull's-eye is a kind of a choker.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the bull's-eye is unrhetorical.; __UNKNOWN__