the fact that the zygote is a narcotic and it is a bondman is not correct.
sent1: something is not narcotic if it embarks and does not marble bystander. sent2: the entrepot is amaranthine if something is amaranthine and/or not xenogeneic. sent3: if something is not a kind of a missionary that it is a kind of a bondman that is sophistic is incorrect. sent4: that if that the major is not sophistic and not missionary is not right then the zygote is a kind of a bondman hold. sent5: if something is a narcotic the fact that it does marble bystander and is not a garboard is incorrect. sent6: the ruddle is a kind of a missionary. sent7: that the entrepot does embark if the entrepot is amaranthine is true. sent8: if something is a kind of a missionary that the major is a kind of non-sophistic thing that is not a kind of a missionary does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the zygote is a divided and is ametropic is false then the brooch does not marble bystander. sent10: that the zygote is not sophistic and it is not a divided is not right. sent11: the major embarks if there is something such that that it is a bondman and it is sophistic is not right. sent12: if something is not a narcotic the fact that that it is a divided and is ametropic is true is not correct. sent13: something that embarks is a narcotic. sent14: there is something such that it is amaranthine or it is non-xenogeneic or both. sent15: if the brooch does not marble bystander the entrepot does not embark. sent16: something is a kind of a garboard if the fact that it does marble bystander and is not a garboard does not hold.
sent12 -> int1: the fact that that the zygote is a kind of the divided and is ametropic is not true if the zygote is not a kind of a narcotic hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zygote is not a kind of a narcotic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the zygote divides and it is ametropic is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the brooch does not marble bystander.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the entrepot does not embark.; sent14 & sent2 -> int5: the entrepot is amaranthine.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the entrepot does embark.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the zygote is a narcotic.; sent6 -> int9: something is a missionary.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: that the major is both not sophistic and not a missionary is not correct.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: the zygote is a bondman.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the major is a garboard.
sent5 -> int12: the fact that the major does marble bystander and is not a garboard is not true if it is a kind of a narcotic.; sent13 -> int13: the major is a narcotic if it does embark.; sent3 -> int14: the fact that if the entrepot is not the missionary the fact that the entrepot is a bondman that is sophistic is not correct is not incorrect.; sent16 -> int15: if the fact that the major does marble bystander but it is not a kind of a garboard is wrong it is a garboard.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the zygote is a narcotic and it is a bondman is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not narcotic if it embarks and does not marble bystander. sent2: the entrepot is amaranthine if something is amaranthine and/or not xenogeneic. sent3: if something is not a kind of a missionary that it is a kind of a bondman that is sophistic is incorrect. sent4: that if that the major is not sophistic and not missionary is not right then the zygote is a kind of a bondman hold. sent5: if something is a narcotic the fact that it does marble bystander and is not a garboard is incorrect. sent6: the ruddle is a kind of a missionary. sent7: that the entrepot does embark if the entrepot is amaranthine is true. sent8: if something is a kind of a missionary that the major is a kind of non-sophistic thing that is not a kind of a missionary does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the zygote is a divided and is ametropic is false then the brooch does not marble bystander. sent10: that the zygote is not sophistic and it is not a divided is not right. sent11: the major embarks if there is something such that that it is a bondman and it is sophistic is not right. sent12: if something is not a narcotic the fact that that it is a divided and is ametropic is true is not correct. sent13: something that embarks is a narcotic. sent14: there is something such that it is amaranthine or it is non-xenogeneic or both. sent15: if the brooch does not marble bystander the entrepot does not embark. sent16: something is a kind of a garboard if the fact that it does marble bystander and is not a garboard does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the fact that that the zygote is a kind of the divided and is ametropic is not true if the zygote is not a kind of a narcotic hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zygote is not a kind of a narcotic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the zygote divides and it is ametropic is not true.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: the brooch does not marble bystander.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: the entrepot does not embark.; sent14 & sent2 -> int5: the entrepot is amaranthine.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the entrepot does embark.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the zygote is a narcotic.; sent6 -> int9: something is a missionary.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: that the major is both not sophistic and not a missionary is not correct.; sent4 & int10 -> int11: the zygote is a bondman.; int8 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__