the dragee hands pommy and it is a kind of a Cynopterus.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bottler and it does not disabuse mobile is not right the cote is not a knower. sent2: that the doorsill is both a mephenytoin and not a scholar is not right. sent3: if the cookie is a kind of a mephenytoin the fact that the doorsill is both not a mephenytoin and a scholar is not right. sent4: something does not overstrain Libra if it does conflict. sent5: if that the cookie is a mephenytoin is not wrong then the fact that the doorsill is not a mephenytoin and not a scholar is false. sent6: something is not exact but it does disabuse doorsill if it is not a ironwork. sent7: if that the damselfish is a kind of a scholar that is not a mephenytoin does not hold the dragee is not a kind of a knower. sent8: the fact that the damselfish is not a bottler and disabuses mobile does not hold. sent9: the fact that that the doorsill is not a mephenytoin and is a scholar is false is not false. sent10: that something does hand pommy and is a kind of a Cynopterus does not hold if it is not a knower. sent11: there is something such that it is not a bottler and does not disabuse mobile. sent12: if something does hand pommy or it is not a ironwork or both then the dragee hand pommy. sent13: if the balance does disabuse doorsill then it does hand pommy or it is not a ironwork or both. sent14: if that something is a nonfiction and not a conflict does not hold the fact that it is a conflict is true. sent15: The doorsill disabuses balance. sent16: the cookie is a mephenytoin if the cote is not a kind of a knower. sent17: the fact that the damselfish is not a bottler and it does not disabuse mobile does not hold if the dragee is not a kind of a Cynopterus. sent18: the doorsill is not effervescent if something that overstrains bustling does not hawk. sent19: the doorsill does disabuse doorsill. sent20: the cote is not a Cynopterus. sent21: if the cote is not exact then that the damselfish is a scholar and is not a mephenytoin is not correct. sent22: something overstrains bustling but it does not hawk. sent23: either the balance does hand pommy or it is a ironwork or both. sent24: the balance disabuses doorsill. sent25: if the doorsill is not effervescent that it is a kind of a nonfiction that is not a conflict is false. sent26: that the doorsill is not exact is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dragee is not a Cynopterus.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the damselfish is not a kind of a bottler and does not disabuse mobile is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a bottler and it does not disabuse mobile is false.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the cote is not a knower.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the cookie is a kind of a mephenytoin.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the doorsill is not a mephenytoin and it is not a scholar does not hold.; sent13 & sent24 -> int6: the balance does hand pommy or it is not a ironwork or both.; int6 -> int7: something hands pommy and/or is not a ironwork.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the dragee does hand pommy.;
the fact that the dragee does hand pommy and it is a kind of a Cynopterus is not correct.
sent10 -> int9: that the dragee hands pommy and it is a Cynopterus does not hold if it is not a knower.; sent6 -> int10: the cote is not exact and disabuses doorsill if it is not a kind of a ironwork.; sent4 -> int11: the doorsill does not overstrain Libra if it is a conflict.; sent14 -> int12: if the fact that the doorsill is both a nonfiction and not a conflict is not correct then it is a conflict.; sent22 & sent18 -> int13: the doorsill is not effervescent.; sent25 & int13 -> int14: that the doorsill is both a nonfiction and not a conflict does not hold.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the doorsill is a conflict.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the doorsill does not overstrain Libra.; int16 -> int17: there is something such that it does not overstrain Libra.;
$hypothesis$ = the dragee hands pommy and it is a kind of a Cynopterus. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a bottler and it does not disabuse mobile is not right the cote is not a knower. sent2: that the doorsill is both a mephenytoin and not a scholar is not right. sent3: if the cookie is a kind of a mephenytoin the fact that the doorsill is both not a mephenytoin and a scholar is not right. sent4: something does not overstrain Libra if it does conflict. sent5: if that the cookie is a mephenytoin is not wrong then the fact that the doorsill is not a mephenytoin and not a scholar is false. sent6: something is not exact but it does disabuse doorsill if it is not a ironwork. sent7: if that the damselfish is a kind of a scholar that is not a mephenytoin does not hold the dragee is not a kind of a knower. sent8: the fact that the damselfish is not a bottler and disabuses mobile does not hold. sent9: the fact that that the doorsill is not a mephenytoin and is a scholar is false is not false. sent10: that something does hand pommy and is a kind of a Cynopterus does not hold if it is not a knower. sent11: there is something such that it is not a bottler and does not disabuse mobile. sent12: if something does hand pommy or it is not a ironwork or both then the dragee hand pommy. sent13: if the balance does disabuse doorsill then it does hand pommy or it is not a ironwork or both. sent14: if that something is a nonfiction and not a conflict does not hold the fact that it is a conflict is true. sent15: The doorsill disabuses balance. sent16: the cookie is a mephenytoin if the cote is not a kind of a knower. sent17: the fact that the damselfish is not a bottler and it does not disabuse mobile does not hold if the dragee is not a kind of a Cynopterus. sent18: the doorsill is not effervescent if something that overstrains bustling does not hawk. sent19: the doorsill does disabuse doorsill. sent20: the cote is not a Cynopterus. sent21: if the cote is not exact then that the damselfish is a scholar and is not a mephenytoin is not correct. sent22: something overstrains bustling but it does not hawk. sent23: either the balance does hand pommy or it is a ironwork or both. sent24: the balance disabuses doorsill. sent25: if the doorsill is not effervescent that it is a kind of a nonfiction that is not a conflict is false. sent26: that the doorsill is not exact is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dragee is not a Cynopterus.; sent17 & assump1 -> int1: that the damselfish is not a kind of a bottler and does not disabuse mobile is not correct.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that that it is not a bottler and it does not disabuse mobile is false.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the cote is not a knower.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the cookie is a kind of a mephenytoin.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the fact that the doorsill is not a mephenytoin and it is not a scholar does not hold.; sent13 & sent24 -> int6: the balance does hand pommy or it is not a ironwork or both.; int6 -> int7: something hands pommy and/or is not a ironwork.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the dragee does hand pommy.; __UNKNOWN__