both the consummation and the nuzzling occurs.
sent1: either the laundering or the defalcation or both occurs. sent2: the fact that either the paralleling Moron does not occur or the mutating Vilnius occurs or both is not correct. sent3: that the paralleling forelock does not occur but the riffling occurs prevents that the paralleling basalt does not occur. sent4: the riffle happens. sent5: the proclamation occurs. sent6: if the paralleling basalt happens the nuzzling occurs. sent7: if the fact that that not the paralleling Moron but the bedrest happens is not incorrect is not correct then the resenting acanthoma occurs. sent8: the fact that the sectarian occurs hold. sent9: that the paralleling forelock does not occur is correct if the proclamation happens and the resenting acanthoma occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paralleling Moron does not occur but the bedrest occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the paralleling Moron does not occur.; int1 -> int2: either the paralleling Moron does not occur or the mutating Vilnius occurs or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that not the paralleling Moron but the bedrest happens does not hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the resenting acanthoma occurs.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: both the proclamation and the resenting acanthoma happens.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the paralleling forelock does not occur hold.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: not the paralleling forelock but the riffle happens.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the paralleling basalt occurs.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the nuzzling occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = both the consummation and the nuzzling occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: either the laundering or the defalcation or both occurs. sent2: the fact that either the paralleling Moron does not occur or the mutating Vilnius occurs or both is not correct. sent3: that the paralleling forelock does not occur but the riffling occurs prevents that the paralleling basalt does not occur. sent4: the riffle happens. sent5: the proclamation occurs. sent6: if the paralleling basalt happens the nuzzling occurs. sent7: if the fact that that not the paralleling Moron but the bedrest happens is not incorrect is not correct then the resenting acanthoma occurs. sent8: the fact that the sectarian occurs hold. sent9: that the paralleling forelock does not occur is correct if the proclamation happens and the resenting acanthoma occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the paralleling Moron does not occur but the bedrest occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the paralleling Moron does not occur.; int1 -> int2: either the paralleling Moron does not occur or the mutating Vilnius occurs or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that not the paralleling Moron but the bedrest happens does not hold.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the resenting acanthoma occurs.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: both the proclamation and the resenting acanthoma happens.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: that the paralleling forelock does not occur hold.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: not the paralleling forelock but the riffle happens.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the paralleling basalt occurs.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the nuzzling occurs.; __UNKNOWN__