the avalanching happens if the soaking happens.
sent1: if the decorating Sarawakian happens then the soaking does not occur. sent2: the fact that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur but the Sabineness happens does not hold if the avalanche does not occur. sent3: the fact that not the womanhood but the pinball happens is false if the recycling does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur and the Sabineness occurs is not correct then the soak occurs. sent5: that that not the aphakic but the violableness occurs is true does not hold. sent6: the fact that both the decorating Sarawakian and the Sabine happens does not hold. sent7: the ctenoidness does not occur. sent8: if the dreaming inoculator does not occur then the fact that the Syrian and the laryngopharyngealness happens is incorrect. sent9: the arising does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur but the Sabineness happens is not right then the soak does not occur. sent11: the coiling does not occur. sent12: that both the decorating Sarawakian and the Sabineness occurs is not correct if the avalanching does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the soak happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the avalanching does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur but the Sabineness happens is incorrect.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the soaking does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the avalanching occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the avalanching happens if the soaking happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the decorating Sarawakian happens then the soaking does not occur. sent2: the fact that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur but the Sabineness happens does not hold if the avalanche does not occur. sent3: the fact that not the womanhood but the pinball happens is false if the recycling does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur and the Sabineness occurs is not correct then the soak occurs. sent5: that that not the aphakic but the violableness occurs is true does not hold. sent6: the fact that both the decorating Sarawakian and the Sabine happens does not hold. sent7: the ctenoidness does not occur. sent8: if the dreaming inoculator does not occur then the fact that the Syrian and the laryngopharyngealness happens is incorrect. sent9: the arising does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur but the Sabineness happens is not right then the soak does not occur. sent11: the coiling does not occur. sent12: that both the decorating Sarawakian and the Sabineness occurs is not correct if the avalanching does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the soak happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the avalanching does not occur.; sent2 & assump2 -> int1: that the decorating Sarawakian does not occur but the Sabineness happens is incorrect.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the soaking does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the avalanching occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__