the fact that the witnessing does not occur but the drilling Pantaloon occurs does not hold.
sent1: that not the conglomeration but the vegetativeness occurs is not right. sent2: that the non-leglessness and/or the resorting happens does not hold. sent3: the loyalty but not the fowling occurs. sent4: the drilling thundershower does not occur. sent5: the pilferage does not occur. sent6: the producer happens if the fact that the resorting happens is true. sent7: that the precancerousness does not occur and the drilling Reoviridae does not occur is not correct. sent8: that the leglessness but not the producer occurs is not true. sent9: the fowl does not occur. sent10: not the resort but the fork happens if the loyalty does not occur. sent11: the forking happens if that the leglessness does not occur and the producer does not occur is not true. sent12: the Jainness happens. sent13: the leglessness occurs if that the producer happens hold. sent14: that the bastinadoing does not occur and the fowling occurs does not hold if the lamplight does not occur. sent15: the fact that the dousing does not occur and the shutout does not occur is not correct. sent16: that the witnessing happens and the drilling Pantaloon occurs does not hold. sent17: the snowballing occurs. sent18: if the bastinado does not occur the fact that not the witnessing but the drilling Pantaloon occurs is not true. sent19: the fact that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and/or the drilling nursed occurs is not true if the leglessness happens. sent20: that the drilling wardenship does not occur and/or the diffracting occurs is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leglessness does not occur and the producer does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the leglessness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the leglessness does not occur or the resort occurs or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the leglessness does not occur and the producer does not occur is false.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the fork occurs.; sent3 -> int6: that the loyalty happens is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the loyalty and the fork occurs.;
the witness does not occur but the drilling Pantaloon happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the witnessing does not occur but the drilling Pantaloon occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that not the conglomeration but the vegetativeness occurs is not right. sent2: that the non-leglessness and/or the resorting happens does not hold. sent3: the loyalty but not the fowling occurs. sent4: the drilling thundershower does not occur. sent5: the pilferage does not occur. sent6: the producer happens if the fact that the resorting happens is true. sent7: that the precancerousness does not occur and the drilling Reoviridae does not occur is not correct. sent8: that the leglessness but not the producer occurs is not true. sent9: the fowl does not occur. sent10: not the resort but the fork happens if the loyalty does not occur. sent11: the forking happens if that the leglessness does not occur and the producer does not occur is not true. sent12: the Jainness happens. sent13: the leglessness occurs if that the producer happens hold. sent14: that the bastinadoing does not occur and the fowling occurs does not hold if the lamplight does not occur. sent15: the fact that the dousing does not occur and the shutout does not occur is not correct. sent16: that the witnessing happens and the drilling Pantaloon occurs does not hold. sent17: the snowballing occurs. sent18: if the bastinado does not occur the fact that not the witnessing but the drilling Pantaloon occurs is not true. sent19: the fact that the hop-step-and-jump does not occur and/or the drilling nursed occurs is not true if the leglessness happens. sent20: that the drilling wardenship does not occur and/or the diffracting occurs is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the leglessness does not occur and the producer does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the leglessness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the leglessness does not occur or the resort occurs or both.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the leglessness does not occur and the producer does not occur is false.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the fork occurs.; sent3 -> int6: that the loyalty happens is correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the loyalty and the fork occurs.; __UNKNOWN__