the harvestfish does toss Penelope.
sent1: the harvestfish does not toss Penelope if the baffle is not a kind of a Seleucus. sent2: the whittler is not verbal if that the baffle is a kind of a Seleucus is not right. sent3: the whittler is a kind of a sentience. sent4: the voicer is a kind of a sentience. sent5: something tosses Penelope and does repudiate if it is not patristic. sent6: if something either does repudiate or is not patristic or both it does toss Penelope. sent7: the chinook is not verbal. sent8: the whittler is a kind of a petrissage if it is a kind of a sentience. sent9: the harvestfish is both a fetch and a Bessera. sent10: if something is not a Seleucus then the fact that it is verbal and it is a kind of a finger is incorrect. sent11: if the whittler does not repudiate the baffle is not a petrissage. sent12: if something does not repudiate that it is a kind of a Seleucus and it is verbal is not right. sent13: the whittler is not verbal. sent14: the whittler tosses Penelope. sent15: if the baffle does repudiate and it is patristic then it is not a finger. sent16: the harvestfish is not a Seleucus. sent17: if that the baffle is a kind of a Seleucus and is verbal does not hold then the harvestfish does not toss Penelope. sent18: if the baffle does not toss Penelope then the harvestfish does not repudiate. sent19: the baffle is not a kind of a sentience. sent20: the whittler does toss Penelope and hones subtreasury. sent21: the harvestfish is not unpublishable and not non-funerary. sent22: the fact that the harvestfish is a petrissage and it is a finger is incorrect if the fact that the baffle is not a Seleucus is not wrong. sent23: the baffle is patristic. sent24: if the whittler is not verbal the fact that it is both not a sentience and a Seleucus is incorrect. sent25: if the baffle is not a finger then the whittler is not a petrissage. sent26: that the caddisworm is not verbal hold. sent27: if that the baffle is patristic and/or it does not finger is wrong the harvestfish is not patristic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the baffle does repudiate.; assump1 & sent23 -> int1: the baffle repudiates and is patristic.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the baffle is not a kind of a finger.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the whittler is not a petrissage.; sent8 & sent3 -> int4: the whittler is a petrissage.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the baffle does not repudiate.; sent12 -> int7: if the baffle does not repudiate the fact that it is a Seleucus that is verbal does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that that the baffle is a kind of a Seleucus and is verbal is incorrect is true.; int8 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the harvestfish does toss Penelope.
sent5 -> int9: if the harvestfish is not patristic then it tosses Penelope and it repudiates.;
$hypothesis$ = the harvestfish does toss Penelope. ; $context$ = sent1: the harvestfish does not toss Penelope if the baffle is not a kind of a Seleucus. sent2: the whittler is not verbal if that the baffle is a kind of a Seleucus is not right. sent3: the whittler is a kind of a sentience. sent4: the voicer is a kind of a sentience. sent5: something tosses Penelope and does repudiate if it is not patristic. sent6: if something either does repudiate or is not patristic or both it does toss Penelope. sent7: the chinook is not verbal. sent8: the whittler is a kind of a petrissage if it is a kind of a sentience. sent9: the harvestfish is both a fetch and a Bessera. sent10: if something is not a Seleucus then the fact that it is verbal and it is a kind of a finger is incorrect. sent11: if the whittler does not repudiate the baffle is not a petrissage. sent12: if something does not repudiate that it is a kind of a Seleucus and it is verbal is not right. sent13: the whittler is not verbal. sent14: the whittler tosses Penelope. sent15: if the baffle does repudiate and it is patristic then it is not a finger. sent16: the harvestfish is not a Seleucus. sent17: if that the baffle is a kind of a Seleucus and is verbal does not hold then the harvestfish does not toss Penelope. sent18: if the baffle does not toss Penelope then the harvestfish does not repudiate. sent19: the baffle is not a kind of a sentience. sent20: the whittler does toss Penelope and hones subtreasury. sent21: the harvestfish is not unpublishable and not non-funerary. sent22: the fact that the harvestfish is a petrissage and it is a finger is incorrect if the fact that the baffle is not a Seleucus is not wrong. sent23: the baffle is patristic. sent24: if the whittler is not verbal the fact that it is both not a sentience and a Seleucus is incorrect. sent25: if the baffle is not a finger then the whittler is not a petrissage. sent26: that the caddisworm is not verbal hold. sent27: if that the baffle is patristic and/or it does not finger is wrong the harvestfish is not patristic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the baffle does repudiate.; assump1 & sent23 -> int1: the baffle repudiates and is patristic.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the baffle is not a kind of a finger.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the whittler is not a petrissage.; sent8 & sent3 -> int4: the whittler is a petrissage.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the baffle does not repudiate.; sent12 -> int7: if the baffle does not repudiate the fact that it is a Seleucus that is verbal does not hold.; int6 & int7 -> int8: that that the baffle is a kind of a Seleucus and is verbal is incorrect is true.; int8 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__