the numdah is a kind of a Eisenstein if the mixed-blood does not severalize introit.
sent1: something does severalize introit if that it is a spindrift is true. sent2: the numdah is a Eisenstein if the fact that the chancel is not indigestible but it adds Olmec is not true. sent3: if something does not add umlaut then the numdah is helpful. sent4: the alabaster is a kind of a Eurocentrism. sent5: the numdah does severalize introit. sent6: something is not a spindrift if that it is a kind of a spindrift and is not indigestible is not right. sent7: the headsman does not add umlaut if the review is both not sisterly and not a bootee. sent8: the fact that the chancel is indigestible and it adds Olmec is not true. sent9: that the chancel is indigestible and does add Olmec does not hold if it does not manhandle review. sent10: if the chancel is indigestible the numdah is a kind of a Eisenstein. sent11: if the chancel does not manhandle review then that it is not indigestible and it does add Olmec is not right. sent12: if something that does not severalize introit is not a spindrift then it does not manhandle review. sent13: the fact that the sapropel is both a spindrift and not indigestible is not true if there exists something such that it does not add Olmec. sent14: if something does not manhandle review then that it does not add Olmec and it does revenge is false. sent15: that the chancel severalizes introit is not false. sent16: if something is a Eurocentrism then the review is not sisterly and it is not a bootee. sent17: the numdah does not manhandle review. sent18: the mixed-blood is a spindrift if that the chancel manhandles review hold. sent19: the stage does not severalize introit. sent20: if the mixed-blood severalizes introit then that the numdah is a Eisenstein hold. sent21: that the chancel does not add Olmec but it is a Eisenstein is not incorrect if the mixed-blood is not a kind of a compromise.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chancel does manhandle review.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mixed-blood is a spindrift.; sent1 -> int2: if the mixed-blood is a spindrift it severalizes introit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mixed-blood severalizes introit.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mixed-blood does not severalize introit.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the chancel does not manhandle review.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the chancel is not indigestible and does add Olmec is right is not correct.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the numdah is a Eisenstein.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the thioguanine does not add Olmec and does revenge is not correct.
sent14 -> int8: if the thioguanine does not manhandle review then the fact that it does not add Olmec and it revenges is wrong.; sent12 -> int9: if the thioguanine does not severalize introit and it is not a spindrift it does not manhandle review.;
$hypothesis$ = the numdah is a kind of a Eisenstein if the mixed-blood does not severalize introit. ; $context$ = sent1: something does severalize introit if that it is a spindrift is true. sent2: the numdah is a Eisenstein if the fact that the chancel is not indigestible but it adds Olmec is not true. sent3: if something does not add umlaut then the numdah is helpful. sent4: the alabaster is a kind of a Eurocentrism. sent5: the numdah does severalize introit. sent6: something is not a spindrift if that it is a kind of a spindrift and is not indigestible is not right. sent7: the headsman does not add umlaut if the review is both not sisterly and not a bootee. sent8: the fact that the chancel is indigestible and it adds Olmec is not true. sent9: that the chancel is indigestible and does add Olmec does not hold if it does not manhandle review. sent10: if the chancel is indigestible the numdah is a kind of a Eisenstein. sent11: if the chancel does not manhandle review then that it is not indigestible and it does add Olmec is not right. sent12: if something that does not severalize introit is not a spindrift then it does not manhandle review. sent13: the fact that the sapropel is both a spindrift and not indigestible is not true if there exists something such that it does not add Olmec. sent14: if something does not manhandle review then that it does not add Olmec and it does revenge is false. sent15: that the chancel severalizes introit is not false. sent16: if something is a Eurocentrism then the review is not sisterly and it is not a bootee. sent17: the numdah does not manhandle review. sent18: the mixed-blood is a spindrift if that the chancel manhandles review hold. sent19: the stage does not severalize introit. sent20: if the mixed-blood severalizes introit then that the numdah is a Eisenstein hold. sent21: that the chancel does not add Olmec but it is a Eisenstein is not incorrect if the mixed-blood is not a kind of a compromise. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chancel does manhandle review.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the mixed-blood is a spindrift.; sent1 -> int2: if the mixed-blood is a spindrift it severalizes introit.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the mixed-blood severalizes introit.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mixed-blood does not severalize introit.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the chancel does not manhandle review.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the fact that the fact that the chancel is not indigestible and does add Olmec is right is not correct.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the numdah is a Eisenstein.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__