the hypotonicity flays and/or is a kind of a hemp.
sent1: the fact that something either flays or is a hemp or both is not right if it is not anaplastic. sent2: the snuffer is a 1770s if the fact that the tragus is masochistic and does not prop congee is not right. sent3: if the fact that the snuffer is a 1770s is not false then the gesso is vestmental. sent4: that the tragus is masochistic and props congee is not true if the halide does not props congee. sent5: the hypotonicity does flay if the gesso is vestmental. sent6: that the fact that the tragus is masochistic and does not prop congee is not wrong does not hold if the halide does not prop congee. sent7: the fact that the halide props synthesist and it is catabolic is false. sent8: the tragus is a kind of a hemp if the hypotonicity is masochistic. sent9: something does not prop congee if it is catabolic. sent10: the snuffer props congee if the fact that the halide is vestmental but it is not a 1770s is not true. sent11: the halide is a 1770s if that the gesso is vestmental and does not prop synthesist is false. sent12: if there is something such that it is anaplastic then that the halide does prop synthesist but it is not catabolic is not correct. sent13: the halide does prop congee if the tragus is a 1770s. sent14: that that the tragus is masochistic and it does prop congee is not true is true. sent15: if the halide is catabolic it does not prop congee. sent16: something is a kind of a 1770s and is masochistic if it is not vestmental. sent17: that the halide does prop synthesist and is catabolic is not correct if there exists something such that it is anaplastic. sent18: the tragus is catabolic. sent19: the snuffer is a kind of a 1770s if the tragus does prop congee. sent20: if the snuffer spectates moral the fact that it is both not a limpet and imprudent is incorrect. sent21: something is anaplastic. sent22: that the snuffer spectates moral is right. sent23: if the halide does prop congee then the hypotonicity does not prop synthesist and is not catabolic. sent24: the gesso does not prop synthesist. sent25: if something does not prop synthesist the fact that it is not anaplastic hold. sent26: if the fact that the hypotonicity does prop synthesist but it is not a hemp is false then the fact that the halide props congee is right. sent27: if that something props synthesist but it is not catabolic does not hold then it does not prop congee.
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: that the halide props synthesist but it is not catabolic does not hold.; sent27 -> int2: the halide does not prop congee if that it does prop synthesist and is not catabolic is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the halide does not prop congee.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the tragus is masochistic thing that does not prop congee does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the snuffer is a 1770s.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the gesso is vestmental.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the hypotonicity flays.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the hypotonicity either flays or is a hemp or both is not right.
sent1 -> int8: that the hypotonicity does flay and/or it is a hemp is wrong if the fact that it is not anaplastic is not wrong.; sent25 -> int9: if the hypotonicity does not prop synthesist it is not anaplastic.; sent16 -> int10: the tragus is a kind of a 1770s that is masochistic if it is not vestmental.; sent20 & sent22 -> int11: the fact that the snuffer is not a limpet but it is imprudent does not hold.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a limpet and it is imprudent is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the hypotonicity flays and/or is a kind of a hemp. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something either flays or is a hemp or both is not right if it is not anaplastic. sent2: the snuffer is a 1770s if the fact that the tragus is masochistic and does not prop congee is not right. sent3: if the fact that the snuffer is a 1770s is not false then the gesso is vestmental. sent4: that the tragus is masochistic and props congee is not true if the halide does not props congee. sent5: the hypotonicity does flay if the gesso is vestmental. sent6: that the fact that the tragus is masochistic and does not prop congee is not wrong does not hold if the halide does not prop congee. sent7: the fact that the halide props synthesist and it is catabolic is false. sent8: the tragus is a kind of a hemp if the hypotonicity is masochistic. sent9: something does not prop congee if it is catabolic. sent10: the snuffer props congee if the fact that the halide is vestmental but it is not a 1770s is not true. sent11: the halide is a 1770s if that the gesso is vestmental and does not prop synthesist is false. sent12: if there is something such that it is anaplastic then that the halide does prop synthesist but it is not catabolic is not correct. sent13: the halide does prop congee if the tragus is a 1770s. sent14: that that the tragus is masochistic and it does prop congee is not true is true. sent15: if the halide is catabolic it does not prop congee. sent16: something is a kind of a 1770s and is masochistic if it is not vestmental. sent17: that the halide does prop synthesist and is catabolic is not correct if there exists something such that it is anaplastic. sent18: the tragus is catabolic. sent19: the snuffer is a kind of a 1770s if the tragus does prop congee. sent20: if the snuffer spectates moral the fact that it is both not a limpet and imprudent is incorrect. sent21: something is anaplastic. sent22: that the snuffer spectates moral is right. sent23: if the halide does prop congee then the hypotonicity does not prop synthesist and is not catabolic. sent24: the gesso does not prop synthesist. sent25: if something does not prop synthesist the fact that it is not anaplastic hold. sent26: if the fact that the hypotonicity does prop synthesist but it is not a hemp is false then the fact that the halide props congee is right. sent27: if that something props synthesist but it is not catabolic does not hold then it does not prop congee. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent12 -> int1: that the halide props synthesist but it is not catabolic does not hold.; sent27 -> int2: the halide does not prop congee if that it does prop synthesist and is not catabolic is not right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the halide does not prop congee.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: that the tragus is masochistic thing that does not prop congee does not hold.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the snuffer is a 1770s.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the gesso is vestmental.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the hypotonicity flays.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__