that the hydromel is not homostylous and is a Kierkegaard is not true.
sent1: something smites hao and it is evaporative if it does not dream version. sent2: if that the davit does dream version and is an experiment is incorrect then it does not dream version. sent3: if something is three-piece then that it is non-homostylous and it is a Kierkegaard does not hold. sent4: if the emplacement is a joystick then that the methanol is not a commonalty and it is not a mitomycin is false. sent5: that the davit does dream version and experiments does not hold. sent6: if something is not a commonalty that it is a virtuosity and is a kind of a mitomycin is not true. sent7: if the hydromel is not three-piece the emplacement is a kind of a tympanum and it is a breakable. sent8: the fact that the hydromel is a kind of non-homostylous thing that is a Kierkegaard if that the emplacement is not non-three-piece is true is not false. sent9: the methanol is not a mitomycin. sent10: the methanol is not a kind of a virtuosity. sent11: if something that does smite hao is evaporative it is not a commonalty. sent12: the methanol is both not a commonalty and not a mitomycin if it is not a virtuosity. sent13: if something is a tympanum then it is a joystick. sent14: the methanol is not a mitomycin if that the davit is both a virtuosity and a mitomycin is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hydromel is not three-piece is right.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the emplacement is a tympanum and it is a kind of a breakable.; int1 -> int2: the emplacement is a kind of a tympanum.; sent13 -> int3: the emplacement is a joystick if it is a tympanum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the emplacement is a kind of a joystick.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the methanol is not a commonalty and not a mitomycin is not correct.; sent12 & sent10 -> int6: the methanol is both not a commonalty and not a mitomycin.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the hydromel is three-piece.; sent3 -> int9: if the hydromel is three-piece then that that it is non-homostylous a Kierkegaard is not false is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the hydromel is not homostylous but a Kierkegaard.
sent6 -> int10: the fact that the fact that the davit is both a virtuosity and the mitomycin is not right if the davit is not a commonalty is not incorrect.; sent11 -> int11: the fact that the davit is not a kind of a commonalty hold if it smites hao and is evaporative.; sent1 -> int12: the davit smites hao and it is evaporative if it does not dream version.; sent2 & sent5 -> int13: the davit does not dream version.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the davit does smite hao and is evaporative.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the davit is not a commonalty.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the davit is a virtuosity and a mitomycin is false.; sent14 & int16 -> int17: the methanol is not a mitomycin.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that it is not a mitomycin.;
$hypothesis$ = that the hydromel is not homostylous and is a Kierkegaard is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something smites hao and it is evaporative if it does not dream version. sent2: if that the davit does dream version and is an experiment is incorrect then it does not dream version. sent3: if something is three-piece then that it is non-homostylous and it is a Kierkegaard does not hold. sent4: if the emplacement is a joystick then that the methanol is not a commonalty and it is not a mitomycin is false. sent5: that the davit does dream version and experiments does not hold. sent6: if something is not a commonalty that it is a virtuosity and is a kind of a mitomycin is not true. sent7: if the hydromel is not three-piece the emplacement is a kind of a tympanum and it is a breakable. sent8: the fact that the hydromel is a kind of non-homostylous thing that is a Kierkegaard if that the emplacement is not non-three-piece is true is not false. sent9: the methanol is not a mitomycin. sent10: the methanol is not a kind of a virtuosity. sent11: if something that does smite hao is evaporative it is not a commonalty. sent12: the methanol is both not a commonalty and not a mitomycin if it is not a virtuosity. sent13: if something is a tympanum then it is a joystick. sent14: the methanol is not a mitomycin if that the davit is both a virtuosity and a mitomycin is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hydromel is not three-piece is right.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the emplacement is a tympanum and it is a kind of a breakable.; int1 -> int2: the emplacement is a kind of a tympanum.; sent13 -> int3: the emplacement is a joystick if it is a tympanum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the emplacement is a kind of a joystick.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the fact that the methanol is not a commonalty and not a mitomycin is not correct.; sent12 & sent10 -> int6: the methanol is both not a commonalty and not a mitomycin.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the hydromel is three-piece.; sent3 -> int9: if the hydromel is three-piece then that that it is non-homostylous a Kierkegaard is not false is wrong.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__