that either the semioticsness happens or the excitement happens or both is not right.
sent1: if the spieling intumescence happens the unadaptableness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the ossiferousness does not occur hold if that the excitement does not occur but the ossiferousness happens is not correct. sent3: if that the Nepaleseness does not occur is true then either the unadaptableness occurs or the resident does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that that the staticsness occurs or the spieling armyworm happens or both is not true hold if the directing does not occur. sent5: the non-ossiferousness leads to that the spieling intumescence does not occur and the pitcher does not occur. sent6: if the unadaptableness does not occur that either the semioticsness happens or the excitement happens or both is incorrect. sent7: if the thaneship does not occur then that the blastoff does not occur and the defloration does not occur is right. sent8: that the excitement does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: that the defloration does not occur leads to that the Nepalese happens and the blastoff happens. sent10: the fact that the semioticsness does not occur and the resident does not occur does not hold if the Nepaleseness happens. sent11: the non-Nepaleseness is brought about by that the blastoff does not occur and the defloration does not occur. sent12: that the excitement does not occur is true if that the unadaptableness does not occur hold. sent13: the ossiferousness happens.
sent13 -> int1: the spieling intumescence and/or the ossiferousness happens.;
the semioticsness happens or the excitement happens or both.
$hypothesis$ = that either the semioticsness happens or the excitement happens or both is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spieling intumescence happens the unadaptableness does not occur. sent2: the fact that the ossiferousness does not occur hold if that the excitement does not occur but the ossiferousness happens is not correct. sent3: if that the Nepaleseness does not occur is true then either the unadaptableness occurs or the resident does not occur or both. sent4: the fact that that the staticsness occurs or the spieling armyworm happens or both is not true hold if the directing does not occur. sent5: the non-ossiferousness leads to that the spieling intumescence does not occur and the pitcher does not occur. sent6: if the unadaptableness does not occur that either the semioticsness happens or the excitement happens or both is incorrect. sent7: if the thaneship does not occur then that the blastoff does not occur and the defloration does not occur is right. sent8: that the excitement does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: that the defloration does not occur leads to that the Nepalese happens and the blastoff happens. sent10: the fact that the semioticsness does not occur and the resident does not occur does not hold if the Nepaleseness happens. sent11: the non-Nepaleseness is brought about by that the blastoff does not occur and the defloration does not occur. sent12: that the excitement does not occur is true if that the unadaptableness does not occur hold. sent13: the ossiferousness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the spieling intumescence and/or the ossiferousness happens.; __UNKNOWN__