that the apogamicness happens prevents that the memorializing coagulase does not occur.
sent1: that both the apogamicness and the blueing morality happens yields that the pranking does not occur. sent2: that the blackmailing occurs hold. sent3: the pranking and the zap happens. sent4: the subordinating happens if the fact that the uncooperativeness occurs is not false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apogamicness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the blueing morality happens hold.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the apogamicness happens and the blueing morality occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the pranking does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the pranking happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the blueing morality does not occur is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the apogamicness happens prevents that the memorializing coagulase does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that both the apogamicness and the blueing morality happens yields that the pranking does not occur. sent2: that the blackmailing occurs hold. sent3: the pranking and the zap happens. sent4: the subordinating happens if the fact that the uncooperativeness occurs is not false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the apogamicness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the blueing morality happens hold.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the apogamicness happens and the blueing morality occurs.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the pranking does not occur.; sent3 -> int3: the pranking happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the blueing morality does not occur is true.; __UNKNOWN__