the sweeper does not blind singleness.
sent1: the sweeper does blind butacaine. sent2: the sweeper is not a drab if it repots delivery. sent3: the sweeper is lithomantic and/or does julienne. sent4: the sweeper is not a canker if it is unclear. sent5: if something is not a guard the kipper is unclear and is historical. sent6: the sweeper is non-deliverable if it is a julienne. sent7: something that is unclear is a professional. sent8: the sweeper is both not well-defined and historical. sent9: either the sweeper is indestructible or it does blind Hipparchus or both. sent10: something that is either historical or a julienne or both does not blind singleness. sent11: if the sweeper is a kind of a scramble it does not blind cardiospasm. sent12: something is not minor if it does lean jackknife and/or is a kind of a Para. sent13: the airdock is not a north if it either is multilane or is a kind of a Polynesian or both. sent14: the fact that the alpinist does not julienne is not incorrect. sent15: the sweeper is not a guard. sent16: the jackknife is not historical if it does blind incident. sent17: if the dendrobium is historical then it does not lean airdock. sent18: the antineutron is not historical. sent19: the sweeper is genetic. sent20: the sweeper is playful.
sent8 -> int1: the sweeper is historical.; int1 -> int2: either the sweeper is historical or it does julienne or both.; sent10 -> int3: if the sweeper is historical or it is a julienne or both it does not blind singleness.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the kipper is a professional and it does blind singleness.
sent7 -> int4: if the kipper is unclear then it is a kind of a professional.; sent15 -> int5: there exists something such that it does not guard.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the kipper is a kind of unclear thing that is historical.; int6 -> int7: the kipper is unclear.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the kipper is a professional.;
$hypothesis$ = the sweeper does not blind singleness. ; $context$ = sent1: the sweeper does blind butacaine. sent2: the sweeper is not a drab if it repots delivery. sent3: the sweeper is lithomantic and/or does julienne. sent4: the sweeper is not a canker if it is unclear. sent5: if something is not a guard the kipper is unclear and is historical. sent6: the sweeper is non-deliverable if it is a julienne. sent7: something that is unclear is a professional. sent8: the sweeper is both not well-defined and historical. sent9: either the sweeper is indestructible or it does blind Hipparchus or both. sent10: something that is either historical or a julienne or both does not blind singleness. sent11: if the sweeper is a kind of a scramble it does not blind cardiospasm. sent12: something is not minor if it does lean jackknife and/or is a kind of a Para. sent13: the airdock is not a north if it either is multilane or is a kind of a Polynesian or both. sent14: the fact that the alpinist does not julienne is not incorrect. sent15: the sweeper is not a guard. sent16: the jackknife is not historical if it does blind incident. sent17: if the dendrobium is historical then it does not lean airdock. sent18: the antineutron is not historical. sent19: the sweeper is genetic. sent20: the sweeper is playful. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the sweeper is historical.; int1 -> int2: either the sweeper is historical or it does julienne or both.; sent10 -> int3: if the sweeper is historical or it is a julienne or both it does not blind singleness.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__