the agapanthus does overawe cowl.
sent1: if the burthen is electrocardiographic then it does chuck. sent2: the fact that the agapanthus emerges is right. sent3: if the crenelation is not a wpm and not a cheating then the hollow does not overawe cowl. sent4: the agapanthus tags grope. sent5: the Cognac is not a pandiculation if that the asshole is not a pandiculation and is not positionable hold. sent6: the pussy-paw is not positionable if the crenelation is a kind of a pandiculation that is a souffle. sent7: the agapanthus emerges if the pussy-paw is not positionable. sent8: if the galactose emerges the asshole is not a pandiculation and it is not positionable. sent9: the crenelation is a pandiculation. sent10: the hollow is a kind of a wpm and it is a cheating. sent11: the crenelation tags grope if it chucks. sent12: if the hollow does not overawe cowl then that the agapanthus does not overawe cowl is not wrong. sent13: if the pussy-paw is not positionable then the agapanthus emerges and overawes cowl. sent14: if the Cognac is a kind of a souffle and does not tag grope then the pussy-paw does not chuck. sent15: the crenelation is a kind of a souffle if that it does tag grope is right. sent16: the fact that the quarterly is a kind of non-stoppable thing that does not emerge is not correct if it does overawe crutch. sent17: the galactose emerges if the fact that the alligator emerges is not incorrect. sent18: the hollow is a cheating. sent19: the crenelation chucks if that the hollow is a wpm is correct. sent20: the quarterly does tag cicerone and overawes crutch. sent21: if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-stoppable thing that does not emerge is not true the alligator does emerge.
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the hollow is a wpm is not incorrect.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the crenelation chucks.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the crenelation does tag grope.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: that the crenelation is a souffle hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the crenelation is a pandiculation and is a souffle.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the pussy-paw is not positionable.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the agapanthus emerges and overawes cowl.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the agapanthus does not overawe cowl.
sent20 -> int8: the quarterly does overawe crutch.; sent16 & int8 -> int9: that the quarterly is unstoppable thing that does not emerge is false.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not stoppable and it does not emerge is false.; int10 & sent21 -> int11: the alligator emerges.; sent17 & int11 -> int12: the galactose does emerge.; sent8 & int12 -> int13: that the asshole is not a pandiculation and it is not positionable is not false.; sent5 & int13 -> int14: the Cognac is not a pandiculation.;
$hypothesis$ = the agapanthus does overawe cowl. ; $context$ = sent1: if the burthen is electrocardiographic then it does chuck. sent2: the fact that the agapanthus emerges is right. sent3: if the crenelation is not a wpm and not a cheating then the hollow does not overawe cowl. sent4: the agapanthus tags grope. sent5: the Cognac is not a pandiculation if that the asshole is not a pandiculation and is not positionable hold. sent6: the pussy-paw is not positionable if the crenelation is a kind of a pandiculation that is a souffle. sent7: the agapanthus emerges if the pussy-paw is not positionable. sent8: if the galactose emerges the asshole is not a pandiculation and it is not positionable. sent9: the crenelation is a pandiculation. sent10: the hollow is a kind of a wpm and it is a cheating. sent11: the crenelation tags grope if it chucks. sent12: if the hollow does not overawe cowl then that the agapanthus does not overawe cowl is not wrong. sent13: if the pussy-paw is not positionable then the agapanthus emerges and overawes cowl. sent14: if the Cognac is a kind of a souffle and does not tag grope then the pussy-paw does not chuck. sent15: the crenelation is a kind of a souffle if that it does tag grope is right. sent16: the fact that the quarterly is a kind of non-stoppable thing that does not emerge is not correct if it does overawe crutch. sent17: the galactose emerges if the fact that the alligator emerges is not incorrect. sent18: the hollow is a cheating. sent19: the crenelation chucks if that the hollow is a wpm is correct. sent20: the quarterly does tag cicerone and overawes crutch. sent21: if there is something such that that it is a kind of non-stoppable thing that does not emerge is not true the alligator does emerge. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the fact that the hollow is a wpm is not incorrect.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the crenelation chucks.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the crenelation does tag grope.; int3 & sent15 -> int4: that the crenelation is a souffle hold.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the crenelation is a pandiculation and is a souffle.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the pussy-paw is not positionable.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the agapanthus emerges and overawes cowl.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__