the fact that the cancer is adscript but it is non-ropey does not hold.
sent1: the stockfish is not a kind of a caldron if it does synthesize perry. sent2: The arbitrageur does style stockfish. sent3: if the fact that the pisanosaur is unplayful and mellows pneumonectomy does not hold then the cancer is not ropey. sent4: if something does synthesize perry that it is adscript and it is not ropey is false. sent5: the cancer is adscript if it styles razor. sent6: the fact that the pisanosaur is unplayful and it mellows pneumonectomy is not true if the stockfish does not synthesize perry. sent7: the cancer is a remount if there is something such that it is a Abidjan. sent8: if something is a Abidjan then the cancer is a remount and it does style razor. sent9: if the fact that the pisanosaur does not mellow pneumonectomy hold the cancer is not ropey. sent10: the fact that if something synthesizes perry then the cancer styles razor is not false. sent11: if the stockfish styles arbitrageur it is a caldron. sent12: the sandwich is a kind of a Abidjan. sent13: the stockfish does style arbitrageur. sent14: the cancer is unplayful. sent15: if the cancer is a caldron it does synthesize perry.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stockfish synthesizes perry.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the stockfish is not a caldron.; sent11 & sent13 -> int2: the stockfish is a kind of a caldron.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stockfish does not synthesize perry.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the pisanosaur is unplayful and does mellow pneumonectomy is false.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the cancer is not ropey.; sent12 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of a Abidjan.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the cancer does remount and does style razor.; int8 -> int9: the cancer styles razor.; sent5 & int9 -> int10: the cancer is adscript.; int6 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cancer is not non-adscript but non-ropey is false.
sent4 -> int11: if the cancer does synthesize perry then the fact that it is adscript thing that is not ropey is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the cancer is adscript but it is non-ropey does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the stockfish is not a kind of a caldron if it does synthesize perry. sent2: The arbitrageur does style stockfish. sent3: if the fact that the pisanosaur is unplayful and mellows pneumonectomy does not hold then the cancer is not ropey. sent4: if something does synthesize perry that it is adscript and it is not ropey is false. sent5: the cancer is adscript if it styles razor. sent6: the fact that the pisanosaur is unplayful and it mellows pneumonectomy is not true if the stockfish does not synthesize perry. sent7: the cancer is a remount if there is something such that it is a Abidjan. sent8: if something is a Abidjan then the cancer is a remount and it does style razor. sent9: if the fact that the pisanosaur does not mellow pneumonectomy hold the cancer is not ropey. sent10: the fact that if something synthesizes perry then the cancer styles razor is not false. sent11: if the stockfish styles arbitrageur it is a caldron. sent12: the sandwich is a kind of a Abidjan. sent13: the stockfish does style arbitrageur. sent14: the cancer is unplayful. sent15: if the cancer is a caldron it does synthesize perry. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stockfish synthesizes perry.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the stockfish is not a caldron.; sent11 & sent13 -> int2: the stockfish is a kind of a caldron.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stockfish does not synthesize perry.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the pisanosaur is unplayful and does mellow pneumonectomy is false.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: the cancer is not ropey.; sent12 -> int7: there is something such that it is a kind of a Abidjan.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the cancer does remount and does style razor.; int8 -> int9: the cancer styles razor.; sent5 & int9 -> int10: the cancer is adscript.; int6 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__