the fact that the digoxin does not miff and is not a Selkup does not hold if that the Masonite does tinkle is true.
sent1: if the Masonite is a Selkup the fact that the digoxin does not miff and it is not a Selkup is incorrect. sent2: if the Masonite does tinkle the fact that the digoxin miffs and is not a Selkup is not correct. sent3: the fact that that the digoxin does not miff and is a Selkup does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: if a non-Venezuelan thing is a kind of a sabbatical then it does not tinkle. sent5: that the digoxin is not a Venezuelan but it is a sabbatical does not hold if the Masonite does miff. sent6: the fact that the digoxin is not a Selkup and not Venezuelan is not correct if the Masonite is a Venezuelan. sent7: if the Masonite is a Selkup then the digoxin is not a Venezuelan and it is not a Selkup. sent8: the whistle is Venezuelan if there is something such that that it does not tinkle and it is not a Venezuelan is not right. sent9: the Masonite is not a kind of a leeward and does not caper audiometer. sent10: the savory is a Selkup. sent11: the cicerone is not a Selkup. sent12: the digoxin does not miff and it is not a Selkup if the Masonite tinkles. sent13: the fact that the digoxin does miff but it is not a Selkup does not hold. sent14: the Masonite does not shop Burnham. sent15: the Masonite does not miff and it is not clear. sent16: if the Masonite is a kind of a Selkup the digoxin does not miff and it is not a Selkup. sent17: if something is a kind of a tax-increase and it is not non-homologous then it is not neonatal. sent18: the Bercy is not a kind of a isomerism but it is a Venezuelan. sent19: if the Masonite does tinkle that the digoxin does not miff and is a kind of a Selkup is not correct. sent20: something is a sabbatical if it is not a Selkup.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Masonite is not a Selkup.; sent4 -> int1: if the Masonite is not a kind of a Venezuelan but it is a sabbatical then it does not tinkle.;
that the whistle is a Venezuelan is true.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the digoxin does not miff and is not a Selkup does not hold if that the Masonite does tinkle is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Masonite is a Selkup the fact that the digoxin does not miff and it is not a Selkup is incorrect. sent2: if the Masonite does tinkle the fact that the digoxin miffs and is not a Selkup is not correct. sent3: the fact that that the digoxin does not miff and is a Selkup does not hold is not incorrect. sent4: if a non-Venezuelan thing is a kind of a sabbatical then it does not tinkle. sent5: that the digoxin is not a Venezuelan but it is a sabbatical does not hold if the Masonite does miff. sent6: the fact that the digoxin is not a Selkup and not Venezuelan is not correct if the Masonite is a Venezuelan. sent7: if the Masonite is a Selkup then the digoxin is not a Venezuelan and it is not a Selkup. sent8: the whistle is Venezuelan if there is something such that that it does not tinkle and it is not a Venezuelan is not right. sent9: the Masonite is not a kind of a leeward and does not caper audiometer. sent10: the savory is a Selkup. sent11: the cicerone is not a Selkup. sent12: the digoxin does not miff and it is not a Selkup if the Masonite tinkles. sent13: the fact that the digoxin does miff but it is not a Selkup does not hold. sent14: the Masonite does not shop Burnham. sent15: the Masonite does not miff and it is not clear. sent16: if the Masonite is a kind of a Selkup the digoxin does not miff and it is not a Selkup. sent17: if something is a kind of a tax-increase and it is not non-homologous then it is not neonatal. sent18: the Bercy is not a kind of a isomerism but it is a Venezuelan. sent19: if the Masonite does tinkle that the digoxin does not miff and is a kind of a Selkup is not correct. sent20: something is a sabbatical if it is not a Selkup. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Masonite is not a Selkup.; sent4 -> int1: if the Masonite is not a kind of a Venezuelan but it is a sabbatical then it does not tinkle.; __UNKNOWN__