the cringle nails MCIA.
sent1: something nails Trotskyite and does tool Aladdin. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the asphalt does nail MCIA or it does not tool Nyiragongo or both is not false is not true the cringle does not nail MCIA. sent3: the saw does snuffle Bavarian but it is not a basketry. sent4: the fact that something snuffles Bavarian but it is not a basketry is false if it does not tool confessional. sent5: the saw does tool Nyiragongo. sent6: that if the saw does not nail MCIA then that the saw does tool Nyiragongo but it does not snuffle Bavarian does not hold is not wrong. sent7: that there exists something such that it does tool confessional is right. sent8: there exists something such that it tools Nyiragongo. sent9: the saw does nail sheatfish. sent10: the cringle tools confessional and/or it does not tool Nyiragongo if the asphalt does nail MCIA. sent11: The Nyiragongo does tool saw. sent12: that the fact that the waters is a winnow and tools sole is not true is true. sent13: the cringle does tool Nyiragongo if something that does nail MCIA is a basketry. sent14: the saw is baric if something is idiographic thing that tools sedulity. sent15: something that does not tool decisiveness does nail MCIA and rallies asphalt.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the saw snuffles Bavarian and is not a kind of a basketry is not correct if that it does not tool confessional is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saw does not tool confessional.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the saw does snuffle Bavarian and is not a kind of a basketry is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the saw does tool confessional.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the saw does tool Nyiragongo and it tools confessional.; int5 -> int6: something does tool Nyiragongo and it tools confessional.;
the stylus is not a basketry.
sent15 -> int7: if that the asphalt does not tool decisiveness hold then it does nail MCIA and it rallies asphalt.;
$hypothesis$ = the cringle nails MCIA. ; $context$ = sent1: something nails Trotskyite and does tool Aladdin. sent2: if the fact that the fact that the asphalt does nail MCIA or it does not tool Nyiragongo or both is not false is not true the cringle does not nail MCIA. sent3: the saw does snuffle Bavarian but it is not a basketry. sent4: the fact that something snuffles Bavarian but it is not a basketry is false if it does not tool confessional. sent5: the saw does tool Nyiragongo. sent6: that if the saw does not nail MCIA then that the saw does tool Nyiragongo but it does not snuffle Bavarian does not hold is not wrong. sent7: that there exists something such that it does tool confessional is right. sent8: there exists something such that it tools Nyiragongo. sent9: the saw does nail sheatfish. sent10: the cringle tools confessional and/or it does not tool Nyiragongo if the asphalt does nail MCIA. sent11: The Nyiragongo does tool saw. sent12: that the fact that the waters is a winnow and tools sole is not true is true. sent13: the cringle does tool Nyiragongo if something that does nail MCIA is a basketry. sent14: the saw is baric if something is idiographic thing that tools sedulity. sent15: something that does not tool decisiveness does nail MCIA and rallies asphalt. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the fact that the saw snuffles Bavarian and is not a kind of a basketry is not correct if that it does not tool confessional is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the saw does not tool confessional.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the saw does snuffle Bavarian and is not a kind of a basketry is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the saw does tool confessional.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the saw does tool Nyiragongo and it tools confessional.; int5 -> int6: something does tool Nyiragongo and it tools confessional.; __UNKNOWN__