there is something such that if it is not a Mauritian that it does outride and it is not a kind of a Ascension is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not dream heroine that it is a seedsman and it does not vex jacklight is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it is single-lane the fact that it is a pledgee and it is not a oxidase is false. sent3: if something is not a kind of a humectant then the fact that it is a charlock and it is scotomatous is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Burt then that it is a devise and non-binocular does not hold. sent5: if something is not a Mauritian it does outride and it is not a Ascension. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Mauritian then it outrides and is not a Ascension. sent7: if the Perm is not non-hemodynamics then the fact that it is decent and it is not a Kennelly is wrong. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Mauritian that it does outride and is a Ascension does not hold. sent9: the fact that the Lot outrides and is a Ascension is not right if it is not a kind of a Mauritian.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a Mauritian that it does outride and it is not a kind of a Ascension is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not dream heroine that it is a seedsman and it does not vex jacklight is not right. sent2: there is something such that if it is single-lane the fact that it is a pledgee and it is not a oxidase is false. sent3: if something is not a kind of a humectant then the fact that it is a charlock and it is scotomatous is not true. sent4: there is something such that if it is a Burt then that it is a devise and non-binocular does not hold. sent5: if something is not a Mauritian it does outride and it is not a Ascension. sent6: there exists something such that if it is not a Mauritian then it outrides and is not a Ascension. sent7: if the Perm is not non-hemodynamics then the fact that it is decent and it is not a Kennelly is wrong. sent8: there is something such that if it is not a Mauritian that it does outride and is a Ascension does not hold. sent9: the fact that the Lot outrides and is a Ascension is not right if it is not a kind of a Mauritian. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__