the pullulation startles detective.
sent1: that the tagliatelle does not clear and it is not Egyptian is incorrect if the fault is not a flurry. sent2: there exists something such that it is a flurry. sent3: the NSAID does not update pullulation but it is tongueless. sent4: the psychrometer is a Friesian but not a single if the fact that the tagliatelle does not dropkick scalpel hold. sent5: the tagliatelle is conscientious if that it is agraphic is not incorrect. sent6: the psychrometer is not a single if it is a Friesian and it is conscientious. sent7: if something does not clear that it is a serotine and it does not startle detective is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a Friesian and startles scunner then it is non-agraphic. sent9: if the psychrometer does not clear then the tagliatelle is not a Friesian. sent10: if a flurry does not single then it is not a cleared. sent11: the NSAID is not a kind of a serotine. sent12: if there exists something such that it is conscientious the NSAID flurries but it does not single. sent13: the NSAID is a cleared. sent14: if something that is a kind of a single startles scunner it is not a Egyptian. sent15: if something is a serotine it is a kind of non-surface-to-air thing that does not update shovelhead. sent16: the psychrometer is not a Friesian and startles scunner. sent17: if the fact that the tagliatelle is not agraphic is true the psychrometer is a Egyptian that does not single. sent18: if the tagliatelle clears and is a single the fact that the pullulation does not startle detective is right. sent19: if the NSAID is not a serotine then the tagliatelle does dropkick scalpel and is not Egyptian. sent20: the fault is not a flurry. sent21: the tagliatelle does single but it is not conscientious if the psychrometer is not agraphic.
sent19 & sent11 -> int1: the tagliatelle does dropkick scalpel but it is not a Egyptian.; int1 -> int2: the tagliatelle is not a Egyptian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tagliatelle does not clear.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the tagliatelle is not cleared and is not a Egyptian.; sent1 & sent20 -> int4: that the tagliatelle is not a cleared and it is not Egyptian is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the tagliatelle clears.; sent8 -> int7: if the psychrometer is not a Friesian but it startles scunner then it is not agraphic.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the psychrometer is non-agraphic.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the tagliatelle is a single but it is not conscientious is not incorrect.; int9 -> int10: the tagliatelle singles.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the tagliatelle is a kind of a cleared and it is a single.; int11 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the pullulation startles detective is not wrong.
sent7 -> int12: if that the NSAID is not a kind of a cleared is not wrong then the fact that it is a serotine and it does not startle detective is incorrect.; sent10 -> int13: if the NSAID is a kind of a flurry that does not single then it is not a kind of a cleared.;
$hypothesis$ = the pullulation startles detective. ; $context$ = sent1: that the tagliatelle does not clear and it is not Egyptian is incorrect if the fault is not a flurry. sent2: there exists something such that it is a flurry. sent3: the NSAID does not update pullulation but it is tongueless. sent4: the psychrometer is a Friesian but not a single if the fact that the tagliatelle does not dropkick scalpel hold. sent5: the tagliatelle is conscientious if that it is agraphic is not incorrect. sent6: the psychrometer is not a single if it is a Friesian and it is conscientious. sent7: if something does not clear that it is a serotine and it does not startle detective is incorrect. sent8: if something is not a Friesian and startles scunner then it is non-agraphic. sent9: if the psychrometer does not clear then the tagliatelle is not a Friesian. sent10: if a flurry does not single then it is not a cleared. sent11: the NSAID is not a kind of a serotine. sent12: if there exists something such that it is conscientious the NSAID flurries but it does not single. sent13: the NSAID is a cleared. sent14: if something that is a kind of a single startles scunner it is not a Egyptian. sent15: if something is a serotine it is a kind of non-surface-to-air thing that does not update shovelhead. sent16: the psychrometer is not a Friesian and startles scunner. sent17: if the fact that the tagliatelle is not agraphic is true the psychrometer is a Egyptian that does not single. sent18: if the tagliatelle clears and is a single the fact that the pullulation does not startle detective is right. sent19: if the NSAID is not a serotine then the tagliatelle does dropkick scalpel and is not Egyptian. sent20: the fault is not a flurry. sent21: the tagliatelle does single but it is not conscientious if the psychrometer is not agraphic. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent11 -> int1: the tagliatelle does dropkick scalpel but it is not a Egyptian.; int1 -> int2: the tagliatelle is not a Egyptian.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the tagliatelle does not clear.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the tagliatelle is not cleared and is not a Egyptian.; sent1 & sent20 -> int4: that the tagliatelle is not a cleared and it is not Egyptian is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the tagliatelle clears.; sent8 -> int7: if the psychrometer is not a Friesian but it startles scunner then it is not agraphic.; int7 & sent16 -> int8: the psychrometer is non-agraphic.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the tagliatelle is a single but it is not conscientious is not incorrect.; int9 -> int10: the tagliatelle singles.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the tagliatelle is a kind of a cleared and it is a single.; int11 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__