the shortstop happens.
sent1: that the dominating Rambouillet and the non-covalentness happens is wrong. sent2: the fact that not the dominating Rambouillet but the covalentness happens is false. sent3: if the profitableness does not occur the electromagnetism occurs. sent4: the inconspicuousness does not occur and the radiance does not occur if the copying Laridae does not occur. sent5: the copying Laridae does not occur if the polarization does not occur but the stenography happens. sent6: the invasiveness does not occur and the counterfire does not occur. sent7: the profitableness does not occur if that the dominating Rambouillet does not occur and the covalentness does not occur is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the radiance does not occur is not false then that the saltation and/or the non-artifactualness happens does not hold. sent9: the copying Piedmont happens if that the saltation and/or the non-artifactualness happens does not hold. sent10: the dominating Rambouillet happens. sent11: if the unpretentiousness occurs then the polarization does not occur but the stenography happens. sent12: the shortstop occurs if the electromagnetism happens. sent13: if that the hating funfair occurs is not incorrect the unpretentiousness happens. sent14: the electromagnetism does not occur but the profitableness happens if the copying Piedmont occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dominating Rambouillet does not occur and the covalentness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the dominating Rambouillet does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dominating Rambouillet does not occur and the covalentness does not occur is not correct.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the profitableness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the electromagnetism occurs.; sent12 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the shortstop does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the shortstop happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the dominating Rambouillet and the non-covalentness happens is wrong. sent2: the fact that not the dominating Rambouillet but the covalentness happens is false. sent3: if the profitableness does not occur the electromagnetism occurs. sent4: the inconspicuousness does not occur and the radiance does not occur if the copying Laridae does not occur. sent5: the copying Laridae does not occur if the polarization does not occur but the stenography happens. sent6: the invasiveness does not occur and the counterfire does not occur. sent7: the profitableness does not occur if that the dominating Rambouillet does not occur and the covalentness does not occur is incorrect. sent8: if the fact that the radiance does not occur is not false then that the saltation and/or the non-artifactualness happens does not hold. sent9: the copying Piedmont happens if that the saltation and/or the non-artifactualness happens does not hold. sent10: the dominating Rambouillet happens. sent11: if the unpretentiousness occurs then the polarization does not occur but the stenography happens. sent12: the shortstop occurs if the electromagnetism happens. sent13: if that the hating funfair occurs is not incorrect the unpretentiousness happens. sent14: the electromagnetism does not occur but the profitableness happens if the copying Piedmont occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the dominating Rambouillet does not occur and the covalentness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the dominating Rambouillet does not occur.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the dominating Rambouillet does not occur and the covalentness does not occur is not correct.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: the profitableness does not occur.; sent3 & int4 -> int5: the electromagnetism occurs.; sent12 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__