that there exists something such that if it is not exaugural and it slams then it does not hew is incorrect.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of exaugural thing that slams then that it does not hew is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both not actinomorphic and a allurement it does not whine. sent3: if the android is not exaugural and maintains antiemetic it is not basipetal. sent4: if something that is not intelligible is a dried then the fact that it is not a saver hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not viral and it does demagnetize simulator it is not a Mesozoic. sent6: the yellowbird is not an extremist if it is not inferential and it is exaugural. sent7: if the incrustation does not maintain eft and is a kind of a slam it is not a kind of a bullshit. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not exaugural and it slams then it does hew. sent9: something is not a Irish if the fact that it is not actinomorphic and is a dishwater is not false. sent10: the vantage does not hew if it is both not exaugural and a slam. sent11: the vantage does not correspond if it is not exaugural and it is appendicular. sent12: that there exists something such that if it does not demagnetize Zabrze and demagnetizes gossiping then it does not maintain fractal is not false. sent13: if the vantage is not exaugural but it does slam it hews. sent14: the vantage does not hew if it is both exaugural and a slam. sent15: that the dome is not singular is not wrong if it is a kind of non-parasympathetic thing that is arbitrable. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not nectar-rich and it is not non-Irish it is not departmental.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not actinomorphic and it is a dishwater then it is not a kind of a Irish.
sent9 -> int1: if the eft is both not actinomorphic and a dishwater then it is not a Irish.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not exaugural and it slams then it does not hew is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a kind of exaugural thing that slams then that it does not hew is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is both not actinomorphic and a allurement it does not whine. sent3: if the android is not exaugural and maintains antiemetic it is not basipetal. sent4: if something that is not intelligible is a dried then the fact that it is not a saver hold. sent5: there exists something such that if it is not viral and it does demagnetize simulator it is not a Mesozoic. sent6: the yellowbird is not an extremist if it is not inferential and it is exaugural. sent7: if the incrustation does not maintain eft and is a kind of a slam it is not a kind of a bullshit. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not exaugural and it slams then it does hew. sent9: something is not a Irish if the fact that it is not actinomorphic and is a dishwater is not false. sent10: the vantage does not hew if it is both not exaugural and a slam. sent11: the vantage does not correspond if it is not exaugural and it is appendicular. sent12: that there exists something such that if it does not demagnetize Zabrze and demagnetizes gossiping then it does not maintain fractal is not false. sent13: if the vantage is not exaugural but it does slam it hews. sent14: the vantage does not hew if it is both exaugural and a slam. sent15: that the dome is not singular is not wrong if it is a kind of non-parasympathetic thing that is arbitrable. sent16: there exists something such that if it is not nectar-rich and it is not non-Irish it is not departmental. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__