the fact that if the unsurmountableness does not occur the fact that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur is false is not wrong.
sent1: if the let does not occur the unsurmountableness occurs and the Antiguanness happens. sent2: the fact that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur is not correct if the unsurmountableness happens. sent3: if the call-back does not occur then the commination but not the manorialness occurs. sent4: if the Antiguan happens then that the unsurmountableness but not the alkylicness happens is false. sent5: that the fluorescence does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur is incorrect. sent6: that the fluorescence does not occur but the unsurmountableness happens is wrong. sent7: the fact that the presiding does not occur and the azimuthalness does not occur is incorrect if the fluorescence happens. sent8: that the fluorescence and the non-alkylicness occurs is not right. sent9: if the ramping occurs both the non-Portugueseness and the ambassadorship happens. sent10: the rhythmicalness does not occur and the educing does not occur. sent11: the imparting burro does not occur if that the biodefense happens and the demanding occurs is not correct. sent12: that the fluorescence and the surmountableness happens does not hold. sent13: if the manorialness does not occur that that both the biodefense and the demanding occurs does not hold hold. sent14: that the ramping does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur prevents the Portuguese. sent15: the fact that the concaveness does not occur and the sleeping mammography does not occur does not hold if the fluorescence occurs. sent16: that the fluorescence does not occur but the alkylicness happens is wrong if the unsurmountableness does not occur. sent17: both the let and the Antiguanness occurs if the Portugueseness does not occur. sent18: that the ramping happens is not incorrect if the imparting burro happens. sent19: the fact that the fact that the fluorescence does not occur but the alkylicness occurs is not true is not incorrect. sent20: the letting does not occur if the Portuguese does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the fluorescence does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unsurmountableness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the fluorescence does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur is true.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur is not true.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the concaveness does not occur and the sleeping mammography does not occur is incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the unsurmountableness does not occur the fact that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur is false is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the let does not occur the unsurmountableness occurs and the Antiguanness happens. sent2: the fact that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur is not correct if the unsurmountableness happens. sent3: if the call-back does not occur then the commination but not the manorialness occurs. sent4: if the Antiguan happens then that the unsurmountableness but not the alkylicness happens is false. sent5: that the fluorescence does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur is incorrect. sent6: that the fluorescence does not occur but the unsurmountableness happens is wrong. sent7: the fact that the presiding does not occur and the azimuthalness does not occur is incorrect if the fluorescence happens. sent8: that the fluorescence and the non-alkylicness occurs is not right. sent9: if the ramping occurs both the non-Portugueseness and the ambassadorship happens. sent10: the rhythmicalness does not occur and the educing does not occur. sent11: the imparting burro does not occur if that the biodefense happens and the demanding occurs is not correct. sent12: that the fluorescence and the surmountableness happens does not hold. sent13: if the manorialness does not occur that that both the biodefense and the demanding occurs does not hold hold. sent14: that the ramping does not occur and the ambassadorship does not occur prevents the Portuguese. sent15: the fact that the concaveness does not occur and the sleeping mammography does not occur does not hold if the fluorescence occurs. sent16: that the fluorescence does not occur but the alkylicness happens is wrong if the unsurmountableness does not occur. sent17: both the let and the Antiguanness occurs if the Portugueseness does not occur. sent18: that the ramping happens is not incorrect if the imparting burro happens. sent19: the fact that the fact that the fluorescence does not occur but the alkylicness occurs is not true is not incorrect. sent20: the letting does not occur if the Portuguese does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the fluorescence does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the unsurmountableness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the fluorescence does not occur and the unsurmountableness does not occur is true.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fluorescence does not occur and the alkylicness does not occur is not true.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__