the Jezebel letters partnership and/or it is not a librettist.
sent1: the spatchcock is a kind of a accordionist if the Jezebel is intrastate. sent2: if the zebra is not a accordionist the fact that the spatchcock is not a telegraphese but it is intrastate is wrong. sent3: the Jezebel does not letter partnership. sent4: the catgut is not dolomitic if the patrician does not wobble Fenusa and it does not divert. sent5: the fact that the zebra is linguistic thing that is not a kind of a Schistosoma is false if there is something such that it is a Schistosoma. sent6: if the fact that the sulfate is a malabsorption and is not a Blenheim is incorrect then the patrician is a Blenheim. sent7: the spatchcock is a kind of a accordionist if the Jezebel is a kind of a telegraphese. sent8: the fact that something is dolomitic a telegraphese is false if it is not a Eurafrican. sent9: something does not letter partnership and is a kind of a librettist if it is not dolomitic. sent10: if the zebra is a accordionist it is linguistic and it is not a Schistosoma. sent11: something letters partnership and/or it is not a librettist if it is a accordionist. sent12: if something does not letter partnership and is a librettist it is not calligraphic. sent13: something does not wobble Fenusa and it does not divert if it is a Blenheim. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is dolomitic and it is a telegraphese is not correct the zebra is not a telegraphese. sent15: if there are non-calligraphic things then the fact that the Jezebel letters partnership and/or it is not a librettist does not hold. sent16: if the catgut is not calligraphic then the Jezebel is a telegraphese or intrastate or both. sent17: if the fact that something is not a kind of a telegraphese but it is intrastate is wrong that it is not calligraphic is not wrong. sent18: that the fact that something is a malabsorption but it is not a kind of a Blenheim is right is false if it does not ferret squaretail. sent19: something is a Schistosoma. sent20: the zebra is intrastate and is calligraphic. sent21: everything is not a Eurafrican. sent22: if the spatchcock is a accordionist the fact that the zebra is a Eurafrican and/or it is not linguistic is not right. sent23: that the flourish is inculpatory is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zebra is a kind of a accordionist.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the zebra is linguistic but it is not a Schistosoma.; sent19 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the zebra is linguistic but it is not a Schistosoma is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the zebra is not a accordionist.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the spatchcock is not a telegraphese and is intrastate is wrong.; sent17 -> int6: if the fact that the spatchcock is not a kind of a telegraphese and is intrastate is not true then it is not calligraphic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the spatchcock is not calligraphic.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not calligraphic.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the zebra is a kind of a Eurafrican and/or it is not linguistic is wrong.
sent12 -> int9: the catgut is non-calligraphic if it does not letter partnership and is a librettist.; sent9 -> int10: if the catgut is not dolomitic it does not letter partnership and it is a librettist.; sent13 -> int11: if the patrician is a Blenheim it does not wobble Fenusa and does not divert.; sent18 -> int12: if the sulfate does not ferret squaretail that it is both a malabsorption and not a Blenheim is wrong.; sent23 -> int13: the flourish is inculpatory or is a federalism or both.; int13 -> int14: something is inculpatory or it is a federalism or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the Jezebel letters partnership and/or it is not a librettist. ; $context$ = sent1: the spatchcock is a kind of a accordionist if the Jezebel is intrastate. sent2: if the zebra is not a accordionist the fact that the spatchcock is not a telegraphese but it is intrastate is wrong. sent3: the Jezebel does not letter partnership. sent4: the catgut is not dolomitic if the patrician does not wobble Fenusa and it does not divert. sent5: the fact that the zebra is linguistic thing that is not a kind of a Schistosoma is false if there is something such that it is a Schistosoma. sent6: if the fact that the sulfate is a malabsorption and is not a Blenheim is incorrect then the patrician is a Blenheim. sent7: the spatchcock is a kind of a accordionist if the Jezebel is a kind of a telegraphese. sent8: the fact that something is dolomitic a telegraphese is false if it is not a Eurafrican. sent9: something does not letter partnership and is a kind of a librettist if it is not dolomitic. sent10: if the zebra is a accordionist it is linguistic and it is not a Schistosoma. sent11: something letters partnership and/or it is not a librettist if it is a accordionist. sent12: if something does not letter partnership and is a librettist it is not calligraphic. sent13: something does not wobble Fenusa and it does not divert if it is a Blenheim. sent14: if there is something such that the fact that it is dolomitic and it is a telegraphese is not correct the zebra is not a telegraphese. sent15: if there are non-calligraphic things then the fact that the Jezebel letters partnership and/or it is not a librettist does not hold. sent16: if the catgut is not calligraphic then the Jezebel is a telegraphese or intrastate or both. sent17: if the fact that something is not a kind of a telegraphese but it is intrastate is wrong that it is not calligraphic is not wrong. sent18: that the fact that something is a malabsorption but it is not a kind of a Blenheim is right is false if it does not ferret squaretail. sent19: something is a Schistosoma. sent20: the zebra is intrastate and is calligraphic. sent21: everything is not a Eurafrican. sent22: if the spatchcock is a accordionist the fact that the zebra is a Eurafrican and/or it is not linguistic is not right. sent23: that the flourish is inculpatory is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the zebra is a kind of a accordionist.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the zebra is linguistic but it is not a Schistosoma.; sent19 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the zebra is linguistic but it is not a Schistosoma is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the zebra is not a accordionist.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: that the spatchcock is not a telegraphese and is intrastate is wrong.; sent17 -> int6: if the fact that the spatchcock is not a kind of a telegraphese and is intrastate is not true then it is not calligraphic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the spatchcock is not calligraphic.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is not calligraphic.; int8 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__