that there is something such that if it does refrain worth it does not circularize Scot and is not a Hominidae is not true.
sent1: if the diagnostician banks then it is non-polymorphemic thing that does not photostat sunrise. sent2: there exists something such that if it does refrain worth it is not a Hominidae. sent3: the tampon does not tarnish and does not photostat storksbill if it does circularize Scot. sent4: the diagnostician is not a predominance and it does not focus if it does mythicize. sent5: something is not acapnic and not a Hominidae if it does circularize pademelon. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not non-bottom is true then it does not photostat horniness and is not a bedder. sent7: there exists something such that if it does refrain worth the fact that it does not circularize Scot and it is a Hominidae is right. sent8: there is something such that if it does photostat shrillness then it is both not sigmoid and not a whacker. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Trichechus then it is both not acapnic and not anesthetic. sent10: the diagnostician does not circularize Scot and it is not a kind of a Hominidae if it refrains worth. sent11: the diagnostician is not a kind of a endospore and it does not circularize Scot if it bottoms. sent12: there exists something such that if it does refrain worth then it does not circularize Scot. sent13: there exists something such that if it culminates then it is not a leash and it is non-acapnic. sent14: the fact that the diagnostician does not circularize Scot if the diagnostician does refrain worth is not false. sent15: there is something such that if it circularizes sociobiologist then it is not significant and is not a firestorm. sent16: the diagnostician does not circularize Scot but it is a Hominidae if it does refrain worth. sent17: if the fact that the fat is a endospore is not false then it does not refrain worth and is not a Belarus. sent18: the diagnostician does not refrain AARP and it is not a Hominidae if it is idiomatic. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a Alcaeus it does not refrain tampon and does not circularize grandparent. sent20: there is something such that if it does refrain worth then it circularizes Scot and it is not a kind of a Hominidae.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the sextant is not acapnic and it is not a kind of a Hominidae if it circularizes pademelon.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does refrain worth it does not circularize Scot and is not a Hominidae is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the diagnostician banks then it is non-polymorphemic thing that does not photostat sunrise. sent2: there exists something such that if it does refrain worth it is not a Hominidae. sent3: the tampon does not tarnish and does not photostat storksbill if it does circularize Scot. sent4: the diagnostician is not a predominance and it does not focus if it does mythicize. sent5: something is not acapnic and not a Hominidae if it does circularize pademelon. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it is not non-bottom is true then it does not photostat horniness and is not a bedder. sent7: there exists something such that if it does refrain worth the fact that it does not circularize Scot and it is a Hominidae is right. sent8: there is something such that if it does photostat shrillness then it is both not sigmoid and not a whacker. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Trichechus then it is both not acapnic and not anesthetic. sent10: the diagnostician does not circularize Scot and it is not a kind of a Hominidae if it refrains worth. sent11: the diagnostician is not a kind of a endospore and it does not circularize Scot if it bottoms. sent12: there exists something such that if it does refrain worth then it does not circularize Scot. sent13: there exists something such that if it culminates then it is not a leash and it is non-acapnic. sent14: the fact that the diagnostician does not circularize Scot if the diagnostician does refrain worth is not false. sent15: there is something such that if it circularizes sociobiologist then it is not significant and is not a firestorm. sent16: the diagnostician does not circularize Scot but it is a Hominidae if it does refrain worth. sent17: if the fact that the fat is a endospore is not false then it does not refrain worth and is not a Belarus. sent18: the diagnostician does not refrain AARP and it is not a Hominidae if it is idiomatic. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a Alcaeus it does not refrain tampon and does not circularize grandparent. sent20: there is something such that if it does refrain worth then it circularizes Scot and it is not a kind of a Hominidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__