the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of non-intercontinental thing that does dandle cabochon then the fact that it is not ropy is not wrong does not hold.
sent1: if something that is not a kind of a xenon dandles signed that it is not a kind of a coif is true. sent2: there is something such that if it does not drowse Dasypodidae and does register it is not an iconoclast. sent3: something does taste if it is both not icterogenic and archosaurian. sent4: if something that is not intercontinental does dandle cabochon it is not ropy. sent5: there is something such that if it is not intercontinental and it dandles cabochon then it is ropy. sent6: if the synergist is ropy and does drowse indigo then it is not a kind of a profundity. sent7: if something is valid but it is antagonistic then it does not drowse clause. sent8: if the synergist is a kind of a musician that is ropy then it is not a kind of a helvella. sent9: if the fact that the cabochon is not a kind of a PWR but it is a kind of a Malay is correct then it does not dandle cabochon. sent10: the synergist is not ropy if it is a kind of intercontinental thing that dandles cabochon. sent11: if something is not intercontinental and dandles cabochon it is ropy. sent12: the synergist is ropy if it is not intercontinental and dandles cabochon. sent13: if something is not a kind of a splash but it is autographic then it is a tango. sent14: if an intercontinental thing dandles cabochon it is not ropy. sent15: that the synergist is not a profundity is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a American and drowses rail-splitter.
sent4 -> int1: the synergist is not ropy if it is not intercontinental and does dandle cabochon.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of non-intercontinental thing that does dandle cabochon then the fact that it is not ropy is not wrong does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that is not a kind of a xenon dandles signed that it is not a kind of a coif is true. sent2: there is something such that if it does not drowse Dasypodidae and does register it is not an iconoclast. sent3: something does taste if it is both not icterogenic and archosaurian. sent4: if something that is not intercontinental does dandle cabochon it is not ropy. sent5: there is something such that if it is not intercontinental and it dandles cabochon then it is ropy. sent6: if the synergist is ropy and does drowse indigo then it is not a kind of a profundity. sent7: if something is valid but it is antagonistic then it does not drowse clause. sent8: if the synergist is a kind of a musician that is ropy then it is not a kind of a helvella. sent9: if the fact that the cabochon is not a kind of a PWR but it is a kind of a Malay is correct then it does not dandle cabochon. sent10: the synergist is not ropy if it is a kind of intercontinental thing that dandles cabochon. sent11: if something is not intercontinental and dandles cabochon it is ropy. sent12: the synergist is ropy if it is not intercontinental and dandles cabochon. sent13: if something is not a kind of a splash but it is autographic then it is a tango. sent14: if an intercontinental thing dandles cabochon it is not ropy. sent15: that the synergist is not a profundity is not incorrect if it is not a kind of a American and drowses rail-splitter. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the synergist is not ropy if it is not intercontinental and does dandle cabochon.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__