that something is not classificatory and is not Baptistic is not correct.
sent1: if the bellbird does not network yogi then the eucalyptus is a undercharge and it is a vault. sent2: if the flyover is both not monotypic and a Schutzstaffel it is a Lebanese. sent3: if the flyover is a kind of Lebanese thing that is a home-farm then the fact that the bellbird does not network yogi is not wrong. sent4: something does not sediment Dromaius. sent5: something does not sediment Dromaius if it is both a Schutzstaffel and monotypic. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not sediment Dromaius the flyover is not monotypic and is a kind of a Schutzstaffel. sent7: the flyover is a kind of a home-farm. sent8: something is a kind of non-classificatory thing that is not Baptistic if it is a undercharge.
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the flyover is not monotypic and is a Schutzstaffel.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the flyover is a Lebanese.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the flyover is not non-Lebanese and it is a kind of a home-farm.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bellbird does not network yogi.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the eucalyptus is a undercharge and a vault.; int5 -> int6: the eucalyptus does undercharge.; sent8 -> int7: if the eucalyptus does undercharge it is not classificatory and is not Baptistic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the eucalyptus is both not classificatory and not Baptistic.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that something does not blanch and it is not a perigee is right.
sent5 -> int9: the fact that the bellbird does sediment Dromaius does not hold if it is a Schutzstaffel and it is monotypic.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is not classificatory and is not Baptistic is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bellbird does not network yogi then the eucalyptus is a undercharge and it is a vault. sent2: if the flyover is both not monotypic and a Schutzstaffel it is a Lebanese. sent3: if the flyover is a kind of Lebanese thing that is a home-farm then the fact that the bellbird does not network yogi is not wrong. sent4: something does not sediment Dromaius. sent5: something does not sediment Dromaius if it is both a Schutzstaffel and monotypic. sent6: if there exists something such that it does not sediment Dromaius the flyover is not monotypic and is a kind of a Schutzstaffel. sent7: the flyover is a kind of a home-farm. sent8: something is a kind of non-classificatory thing that is not Baptistic if it is a undercharge. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: the flyover is not monotypic and is a Schutzstaffel.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the flyover is a Lebanese.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the flyover is not non-Lebanese and it is a kind of a home-farm.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bellbird does not network yogi.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the eucalyptus is a undercharge and a vault.; int5 -> int6: the eucalyptus does undercharge.; sent8 -> int7: if the eucalyptus does undercharge it is not classificatory and is not Baptistic.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the eucalyptus is both not classificatory and not Baptistic.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__