the fact that that the scourging postponement happens and the tetravalentness happens prevents the purifying corm does not hold.
sent1: the appraisal happens. sent2: if the tetravalentness does not occur the scourging postponement happens and the scourging main-topmast occurs. sent3: the insensibleness does not occur. sent4: both the superficialness and the diamantineness occurs. sent5: the purifying corm occurs if the scourging postponement and the tetravalentness happens. sent6: the slogging does not occur. sent7: the pipeline and/or the turning occurs. sent8: the Catalan does not occur. sent9: the pipeline does not occur. sent10: if the diadromousness does not occur the paternity happens. sent11: the tempest happens. sent12: that the cyber-terrorism does not occur but the paternity occurs is not right if the pipeline does not occur. sent13: the acting occurs. sent14: the existentness is triggered by that the seaward and the capableness happens. sent15: the barbecuing happens. sent16: if the fact that the harmonics does not occur hold the fact that that not the musicalness but the vaulting plagiocephaly occurs is false hold. sent17: the fact that the scourging postponement occurs hold. sent18: the non-plantigradeness is prevented by that the overflow and the ESR happens. sent19: that the scourging liquefaction does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the practice does not occur and the scourging liquefaction happens is not right. sent20: if the fact that not the cyber-terrorism but the paternity occurs is not correct then the paternity does not occur. sent21: that both the tetravalentness and the purifying corm happens prevents that the diadromousness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scourging postponement and the tetravalentness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the tetravalentness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the purifying corm occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the tetravalentness and the purifying corm occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the diadromousness does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the paternity happens.; sent12 & sent9 -> int5: that the cyber-terrorism does not occur and the paternity happens does not hold.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the paternity does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the purifying corm does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the scourging main-topmast happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the scourging postponement happens and the tetravalentness happens prevents the purifying corm does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the appraisal happens. sent2: if the tetravalentness does not occur the scourging postponement happens and the scourging main-topmast occurs. sent3: the insensibleness does not occur. sent4: both the superficialness and the diamantineness occurs. sent5: the purifying corm occurs if the scourging postponement and the tetravalentness happens. sent6: the slogging does not occur. sent7: the pipeline and/or the turning occurs. sent8: the Catalan does not occur. sent9: the pipeline does not occur. sent10: if the diadromousness does not occur the paternity happens. sent11: the tempest happens. sent12: that the cyber-terrorism does not occur but the paternity occurs is not right if the pipeline does not occur. sent13: the acting occurs. sent14: the existentness is triggered by that the seaward and the capableness happens. sent15: the barbecuing happens. sent16: if the fact that the harmonics does not occur hold the fact that that not the musicalness but the vaulting plagiocephaly occurs is false hold. sent17: the fact that the scourging postponement occurs hold. sent18: the non-plantigradeness is prevented by that the overflow and the ESR happens. sent19: that the scourging liquefaction does not occur is not incorrect if the fact that the practice does not occur and the scourging liquefaction happens is not right. sent20: if the fact that not the cyber-terrorism but the paternity occurs is not correct then the paternity does not occur. sent21: that both the tetravalentness and the purifying corm happens prevents that the diadromousness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the scourging postponement and the tetravalentness happens.; assump1 -> int1: the tetravalentness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the purifying corm occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the tetravalentness and the purifying corm occurs.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the diadromousness does not occur.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the paternity happens.; sent12 & sent9 -> int5: that the cyber-terrorism does not occur and the paternity happens does not hold.; sent20 & int5 -> int6: the paternity does not occur.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int7 -> int8: the purifying corm does not occur.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__