there exists something such that if it is not pineal then the fact that it is a kind of a squatter that does not sample Downing does not hold.
sent1: if something is not a admass then that it is not non-fitter and not divisible is not right. sent2: if something does not sample blocking that it clouds glacier and it is not protrusive is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not pineal then the fact that it is a kind of a squatter and it does sample Downing is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not pineal then it is a kind of a squatter that does not sample Downing. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a bowl hold then that it is a clearing that is not macrocosmic is wrong. sent6: if the glacier is not pineal it is a kind of a squatter and it does not sample Downing. sent7: if something is a kind of a haggle then that it is a kind of a Arminian and it is not a generalship is incorrect. sent8: that something is a Tahiti but it is not protrusive does not hold if it does cloud kit. sent9: if something is not pineal it is a squatter and it does not sample Downing. sent10: the fact that the glacier is a kind of a squatter and it samples Downing is not correct if it is not pineal. sent11: if something is not a kind of a grater it does sample chivalry and is not a bowl. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not non-pineal then the fact that it is a squatter and it does not sample Downing does not hold. sent13: that something is a Scholasticism and is not a special is wrong if it is not coastal. sent14: that if the glacier is pineal then the fact that the glacier is a squatter but it does not sample Downing is not right is not wrong. sent15: that something hooks monopolist and is not a Atlantic is false if it is protrusive.
there is something such that if it does not sample blocking that it clouds glacier and it is not protrusive is not right.
sent2 -> int1: that the monopolist does cloud glacier but it is not protrusive is not true if it does not sample blocking.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not pineal then the fact that it is a kind of a squatter that does not sample Downing does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a admass then that it is not non-fitter and not divisible is not right. sent2: if something does not sample blocking that it clouds glacier and it is not protrusive is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if it is not pineal then the fact that it is a kind of a squatter and it does sample Downing is wrong. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not pineal then it is a kind of a squatter that does not sample Downing. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a bowl hold then that it is a clearing that is not macrocosmic is wrong. sent6: if the glacier is not pineal it is a kind of a squatter and it does not sample Downing. sent7: if something is a kind of a haggle then that it is a kind of a Arminian and it is not a generalship is incorrect. sent8: that something is a Tahiti but it is not protrusive does not hold if it does cloud kit. sent9: if something is not pineal it is a squatter and it does not sample Downing. sent10: the fact that the glacier is a kind of a squatter and it samples Downing is not correct if it is not pineal. sent11: if something is not a kind of a grater it does sample chivalry and is not a bowl. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not non-pineal then the fact that it is a squatter and it does not sample Downing does not hold. sent13: that something is a Scholasticism and is not a special is wrong if it is not coastal. sent14: that if the glacier is pineal then the fact that the glacier is a squatter but it does not sample Downing is not right is not wrong. sent15: that something hooks monopolist and is not a Atlantic is false if it is protrusive. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__