the fact that both the rush and the non-unbreakableness occurs is not correct if the IRA occurs.
sent1: that either the rushing happens or the officialness occurs or both is triggered by that the variolation does not occur. sent2: that the fact that the jump happens but the processing sop does not occur does not hold is not false if the roasting happens. sent3: if the IRA happens the fact that both the rushing and the unbreakableness occurs is not right. sent4: that the acquiring happens triggers that the dissenting precava and the nonmetamorphicness happens. sent5: the fact that the courteousness happens but the chopper does not occur is not right if the headmistressship does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the variolation occurs and the allowing happens is wrong the variolation does not occur. sent7: that both the rush and the breakableness happens is not true if the topicalness does not occur. sent8: that the overexertion happens and the dissenting huarache does not occur does not hold if the Kuroshio happens. sent9: the rushing happens but the unbreakableness does not occur. sent10: the topicalness does not occur if the processing drosophila happens and/or the tunneling occurs. sent11: the depersonalization happens and the purring does not occur if the nonresidentialness happens. sent12: the rush happens and the unbreakableness does not occur if the topicalness does not occur. sent13: the fact that both the rushing and the unbreakableness happens does not hold if the topicalness does not occur. sent14: that the processing drosophila happens is prevented by that not the tunneling but the topicalness occurs. sent15: the nuclearness occurs but the dissenting botanist does not occur if the dissenting insulin happens.
either the conviction or the Carmeliteness or both occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that both the rush and the non-unbreakableness occurs is not correct if the IRA occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that either the rushing happens or the officialness occurs or both is triggered by that the variolation does not occur. sent2: that the fact that the jump happens but the processing sop does not occur does not hold is not false if the roasting happens. sent3: if the IRA happens the fact that both the rushing and the unbreakableness occurs is not right. sent4: that the acquiring happens triggers that the dissenting precava and the nonmetamorphicness happens. sent5: the fact that the courteousness happens but the chopper does not occur is not right if the headmistressship does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the variolation occurs and the allowing happens is wrong the variolation does not occur. sent7: that both the rush and the breakableness happens is not true if the topicalness does not occur. sent8: that the overexertion happens and the dissenting huarache does not occur does not hold if the Kuroshio happens. sent9: the rushing happens but the unbreakableness does not occur. sent10: the topicalness does not occur if the processing drosophila happens and/or the tunneling occurs. sent11: the depersonalization happens and the purring does not occur if the nonresidentialness happens. sent12: the rush happens and the unbreakableness does not occur if the topicalness does not occur. sent13: the fact that both the rushing and the unbreakableness happens does not hold if the topicalness does not occur. sent14: that the processing drosophila happens is prevented by that not the tunneling but the topicalness occurs. sent15: the nuclearness occurs but the dissenting botanist does not occur if the dissenting insulin happens. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__