the benevolence happens.
sent1: the life prevents that the bailiffship does not occur. sent2: that the intrusion occurs leads to that the miss happens. sent3: the cannibalisticness happens if that the brassiness happens is not wrong. sent4: the miss happens if the interception occurs. sent5: if the bailiffship happens then the segregating Catholic does not occur and the decanting does not occur. sent6: either the intrusion or the interception or both happens. sent7: the humanness occurs if the carjacking Piper happens. sent8: that if the missing occurs that the life happens is not false is correct. sent9: that the segregating Catholic does not occur and the decanting does not occur results in the benevolence.
sent6 & sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the missing occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the life happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bailiffship occurs.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the segregating Catholic does not occur and the decanting does not occur is true.; sent9 & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the benevolence happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the life prevents that the bailiffship does not occur. sent2: that the intrusion occurs leads to that the miss happens. sent3: the cannibalisticness happens if that the brassiness happens is not wrong. sent4: the miss happens if the interception occurs. sent5: if the bailiffship happens then the segregating Catholic does not occur and the decanting does not occur. sent6: either the intrusion or the interception or both happens. sent7: the humanness occurs if the carjacking Piper happens. sent8: that if the missing occurs that the life happens is not false is correct. sent9: that the segregating Catholic does not occur and the decanting does not occur results in the benevolence. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the missing occurs.; sent8 & int1 -> int2: the life happens.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the bailiffship occurs.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: that the segregating Catholic does not occur and the decanting does not occur is true.; sent9 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__