if the lashing is catechetical the Hegelian is pyroligneous.
sent1: the Hegelian unbends. sent2: something is pyroligneous and it does unbend. sent3: something does default Pusan. sent4: the fact that the lashing is a kind of an internationalization that respects Curcuma does not hold. sent5: the lashing is pyroligneous and is catechetical. sent6: the lashing is an internationalization if there exists something such that it does not unbend. sent7: the projectionist does respect Curcuma. sent8: the assessee is catechetical. sent9: the lashing is an internationalization if there exists something such that the fact that it does unbend and it does respect Curcuma does not hold. sent10: there is something such that that that it is pyroligneous and it unbends is not wrong is false. sent11: that the heliozoan unbends is right. sent12: there is something such that it is an internationalization. sent13: if something is catechetical and it is a kind of an internationalization then the Hegelian is pyroligneous. sent14: if the fact that the Hegelian is an internationalization is not incorrect then the lashing is pyroligneous. sent15: the Hegelian is catechetical. sent16: the Hegelian is unenthusiastic. sent17: something is a postern and it is unenthusiastic. sent18: if the Hegelian does unbend the copy is pyroligneous. sent19: the lashing does unbend. sent20: the fact that the lashing respects Curcuma and is an internationalization is wrong. sent21: the lashing is catechetical and it is pyroligneous. sent22: the fact that the copy is a kind of an internationalization and it respects Curcuma is incorrect. sent23: that the copy unbends and it respects Curcuma is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the lashing is catechetical is right.; sent23 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does unbend and does respect Curcuma does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the lashing is a kind of an internationalization.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the lashing is catechetical and is a kind of an internationalization.; int3 -> int4: something is catechetical an internationalization.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the Hegelian is pyroligneous.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the lashing is catechetical the Hegelian is pyroligneous. ; $context$ = sent1: the Hegelian unbends. sent2: something is pyroligneous and it does unbend. sent3: something does default Pusan. sent4: the fact that the lashing is a kind of an internationalization that respects Curcuma does not hold. sent5: the lashing is pyroligneous and is catechetical. sent6: the lashing is an internationalization if there exists something such that it does not unbend. sent7: the projectionist does respect Curcuma. sent8: the assessee is catechetical. sent9: the lashing is an internationalization if there exists something such that the fact that it does unbend and it does respect Curcuma does not hold. sent10: there is something such that that that it is pyroligneous and it unbends is not wrong is false. sent11: that the heliozoan unbends is right. sent12: there is something such that it is an internationalization. sent13: if something is catechetical and it is a kind of an internationalization then the Hegelian is pyroligneous. sent14: if the fact that the Hegelian is an internationalization is not incorrect then the lashing is pyroligneous. sent15: the Hegelian is catechetical. sent16: the Hegelian is unenthusiastic. sent17: something is a postern and it is unenthusiastic. sent18: if the Hegelian does unbend the copy is pyroligneous. sent19: the lashing does unbend. sent20: the fact that the lashing respects Curcuma and is an internationalization is wrong. sent21: the lashing is catechetical and it is pyroligneous. sent22: the fact that the copy is a kind of an internationalization and it respects Curcuma is incorrect. sent23: that the copy unbends and it respects Curcuma is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the lashing is catechetical is right.; sent23 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does unbend and does respect Curcuma does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the lashing is a kind of an internationalization.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: the lashing is catechetical and is a kind of an internationalization.; int3 -> int4: something is catechetical an internationalization.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the Hegelian is pyroligneous.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__