that the micronutrient is not accentual is not false.
sent1: if something does not snow cow either it is satisfactory or it is not a kind of an ana or both. sent2: the fact that the dandelion is not a rotary is right. sent3: the micronutrient does not snow cow if the dandelion is a rotary. sent4: the fact that the spearmint is not saccadic hold. sent5: The fact that the cow snows spearmint is true. sent6: something snows cow and is satisfactory. sent7: if there is something such that it is an ana and satisfactory then the spearmint does not snow cow. sent8: the fact that the spearmint snows cow is true. sent9: that the spearmint is not gladiatorial but it is a decumary is not correct if it is a letterpress. sent10: there is something such that it is not accentual. sent11: the micronutrient is not accentual if there exists something such that it is not a rotary and is not satisfactory. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it does snow micronutrient is correct. sent13: that the dandelion is an ana is not incorrect. sent14: something is both not a rotary and accentual. sent15: if something is satisfactory and/or it is not an ana it is accentual.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dandelion is not unsatisfactory is not incorrect.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the dandelion is an ana and satisfactory.; int1 -> int2: something is an ana and it is satisfactory.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the spearmint does not snow cow.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the dandelion is not satisfactory.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the dandelion is not a rotary and it is not satisfactory.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a rotary and it is not satisfactory.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the micronutrient is accentual.
sent15 -> int8: if the micronutrient is satisfactory and/or it is not a kind of an ana then it is accentual.; sent1 -> int9: that if the fact that the micronutrient does not snow cow is right then either the micronutrient is satisfactory or it is not an ana or both is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = that the micronutrient is not accentual is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not snow cow either it is satisfactory or it is not a kind of an ana or both. sent2: the fact that the dandelion is not a rotary is right. sent3: the micronutrient does not snow cow if the dandelion is a rotary. sent4: the fact that the spearmint is not saccadic hold. sent5: The fact that the cow snows spearmint is true. sent6: something snows cow and is satisfactory. sent7: if there is something such that it is an ana and satisfactory then the spearmint does not snow cow. sent8: the fact that the spearmint snows cow is true. sent9: that the spearmint is not gladiatorial but it is a decumary is not correct if it is a letterpress. sent10: there is something such that it is not accentual. sent11: the micronutrient is not accentual if there exists something such that it is not a rotary and is not satisfactory. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it does snow micronutrient is correct. sent13: that the dandelion is an ana is not incorrect. sent14: something is both not a rotary and accentual. sent15: if something is satisfactory and/or it is not an ana it is accentual. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the dandelion is not unsatisfactory is not incorrect.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the dandelion is an ana and satisfactory.; int1 -> int2: something is an ana and it is satisfactory.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: the spearmint does not snow cow.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the dandelion is not satisfactory.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the dandelion is not a rotary and it is not satisfactory.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a rotary and it is not satisfactory.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__