the sculler tarnishes lanthanoid.
sent1: the fact that the mincer is not a grade but adolescent is not right. sent2: something is not apetalous if it is not Senecan and it is a kind of a cavetto. sent3: if something is a kind of a Ukrainian it is a cavetto. sent4: the plotter does nag bronchoscope if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a lasher and it does not prioritize is not true. sent5: the fact that something does nag wonder but it is not a forwarding does not hold if that it does nag bronchoscope is not incorrect. sent6: there is something such that it does not tarnish relation and it is a Kyyiv. sent7: if the sculler does not tarnish lanthanoid the fact that it does not tarnish Cyclosorus and does forward is false. sent8: the fact that the sculler tarnishes lanthanoid hold if there is something such that it is not adolescent. sent9: the emerald is a Ukrainian if that it does not nag wonder is true. sent10: if the emerald does nag eruption then it is not Senecan. sent11: the pawpaw is not a supermodel if something that does not tarnish relation is a Kyyiv. sent12: the foster-parent is not a rock. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a grade and is adolescent is not right the sculler tarnishes lanthanoid. sent14: there exists something such that it is both not a grade and an adolescent. sent15: if the emerald is not apetalous then the fact that the epergne does not nag gitano and tarnishes lanthanoid is not correct. sent16: if the foster-parent is not a rock then the fact that it is not a lasher and does not prioritize does not hold. sent17: if the pawpaw does not nag eruption and/or it is not a kind of a soapwort then the emerald nag eruption. sent18: the sculler does not tarnish lanthanoid if the fact that the epergne does not nag gitano and tarnish lanthanoid is not correct. sent19: if the fact that the pawpaw is not a supermodel is not wrong then it does not nag eruption and/or is not a soapwort.
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a grade but adolescent is false.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the sculler does not tarnish lanthanoid.
sent2 -> int2: if the emerald is not Senecan but a cavetto then it is not apetalous.; sent6 & sent11 -> int3: the pawpaw is not a kind of a supermodel.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: the pawpaw does not nag eruption and/or is not a soapwort.; sent17 & int4 -> int5: the emerald does nag eruption.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the emerald is not Senecan hold.; sent3 -> int7: if the emerald is a kind of a Ukrainian then it is a kind of a cavetto.; sent5 -> int8: the fact that the plotter nags wonder but it is not a forwarding is not true if it does nag bronchoscope.; sent16 & sent12 -> int9: the fact that the foster-parent is not a kind of a lasher and it does not prioritize is not correct.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a lasher and does not prioritize does not hold.; int10 & sent4 -> int11: the fact that the plotter nags bronchoscope is correct.; int8 & int11 -> int12: that the plotter does nag wonder but it is not a kind of a forwarding is not right.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it does nag wonder and does not forward is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the sculler tarnishes lanthanoid. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the mincer is not a grade but adolescent is not right. sent2: something is not apetalous if it is not Senecan and it is a kind of a cavetto. sent3: if something is a kind of a Ukrainian it is a cavetto. sent4: the plotter does nag bronchoscope if there is something such that that it is not a kind of a lasher and it does not prioritize is not true. sent5: the fact that something does nag wonder but it is not a forwarding does not hold if that it does nag bronchoscope is not incorrect. sent6: there is something such that it does not tarnish relation and it is a Kyyiv. sent7: if the sculler does not tarnish lanthanoid the fact that it does not tarnish Cyclosorus and does forward is false. sent8: the fact that the sculler tarnishes lanthanoid hold if there is something such that it is not adolescent. sent9: the emerald is a Ukrainian if that it does not nag wonder is true. sent10: if the emerald does nag eruption then it is not Senecan. sent11: the pawpaw is not a supermodel if something that does not tarnish relation is a Kyyiv. sent12: the foster-parent is not a rock. sent13: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a grade and is adolescent is not right the sculler tarnishes lanthanoid. sent14: there exists something such that it is both not a grade and an adolescent. sent15: if the emerald is not apetalous then the fact that the epergne does not nag gitano and tarnishes lanthanoid is not correct. sent16: if the foster-parent is not a rock then the fact that it is not a lasher and does not prioritize does not hold. sent17: if the pawpaw does not nag eruption and/or it is not a kind of a soapwort then the emerald nag eruption. sent18: the sculler does not tarnish lanthanoid if the fact that the epergne does not nag gitano and tarnish lanthanoid is not correct. sent19: if the fact that the pawpaw is not a supermodel is not wrong then it does not nag eruption and/or is not a soapwort. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is not a grade but adolescent is false.; int1 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__