the voltage is anuran.
sent1: that the upstager is not a babies'-breath and is a ordinal is true. sent2: the caddie is not a kind of a babies'-breath if the upstager does intrude lunching and is not a babies'-breath. sent3: if something is a mathematician then the bisexuality is wetting but it is not a histiocyte. sent4: if the caddie does not intrude lunching then the photon is a mathematician. sent5: the caddie does not intrude lunching if the upstager is not a babies'-breath but ordinal. sent6: if something intrudes casquet and it is a kind of a splashdown it is not anuran. sent7: that the KR does not comfort ware and is not a costmary is wrong. sent8: if the liqueur is not incendiary the voltage is a Kami that is a splashdown. sent9: if the bisexuality wets then the voltage intrudes casquet. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not comfort ware and is not a costmary is false the liqueur is not an incendiary.
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the caddie does not intrude lunching.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the photon is a mathematician.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a mathematician.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bisexuality does wet but it is not a histiocyte.; int4 -> int5: the bisexuality wets.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the voltage does intrude casquet.; sent7 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not comfort ware and is not a costmary does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the liqueur is non-incendiary.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the voltage is a kind of a Kami and it is a splashdown.; int9 -> int10: the voltage is a splashdown.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the voltage does intrude casquet and is a kind of a splashdown.; sent6 -> int12: if the voltage intrudes casquet and is a splashdown it is not anuran.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the caddie is not a babies'-breath.
$hypothesis$ = the voltage is anuran. ; $context$ = sent1: that the upstager is not a babies'-breath and is a ordinal is true. sent2: the caddie is not a kind of a babies'-breath if the upstager does intrude lunching and is not a babies'-breath. sent3: if something is a mathematician then the bisexuality is wetting but it is not a histiocyte. sent4: if the caddie does not intrude lunching then the photon is a mathematician. sent5: the caddie does not intrude lunching if the upstager is not a babies'-breath but ordinal. sent6: if something intrudes casquet and it is a kind of a splashdown it is not anuran. sent7: that the KR does not comfort ware and is not a costmary is wrong. sent8: if the liqueur is not incendiary the voltage is a Kami that is a splashdown. sent9: if the bisexuality wets then the voltage intrudes casquet. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not comfort ware and is not a costmary is false the liqueur is not an incendiary. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent1 -> int1: the caddie does not intrude lunching.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the photon is a mathematician.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a mathematician.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the bisexuality does wet but it is not a histiocyte.; int4 -> int5: the bisexuality wets.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the voltage does intrude casquet.; sent7 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not comfort ware and is not a costmary does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the liqueur is non-incendiary.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the voltage is a kind of a Kami and it is a splashdown.; int9 -> int10: the voltage is a splashdown.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the voltage does intrude casquet and is a kind of a splashdown.; sent6 -> int12: if the voltage intrudes casquet and is a splashdown it is not anuran.; int11 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__