the papaya is a birdie and dichromatic.
sent1: the socle is a medlar if there is something such that that it does comfort orderliness and is an italic is incorrect. sent2: if the papaya does not comfort herringbone then it is not myelic. sent3: if the papaya is a medlar then it does birdie. sent4: the papaya does not comfort herringbone if there is something such that that it does draw respite is not false. sent5: if there is something such that it is not an italic the socle is a medlar. sent6: if the fact that the socle is not a kind of a medlar hold that the papaya does birdie and it is dichromatic is not right. sent7: the socle is an italic. sent8: there is something such that it comforts orderliness and is a kind of an italic. sent9: if the fact that the socle is a medlar is true then it is a kind of a Nevada. sent10: that something is a birdie that is dichromatic does not hold if that it is not a kind of a medlar is correct. sent11: the papaya does comfort orderliness and is not a austenite. sent12: if the socle is a kind of a Nevada then it draws respite. sent13: the papaya is not non-dichromatic. sent14: the papaya birdies but it is not myelic if it does not comfort herringbone. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it comforts orderliness and it is a kind of an italic is wrong.
sent15 & sent1 -> int1: the socle is a medlar.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the socle is a Nevada.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the socle draws respite.; int3 -> int4: something draws respite.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the papaya does not comfort herringbone.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the papaya is a birdie but it is not myelic.; int6 -> int7: the papaya is a kind of a birdie.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
that the papaya is a birdie and is dichromatic is not correct.
sent10 -> int8: if the papaya is not a kind of a medlar that it is a birdie and it is dichromatic is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the papaya is a birdie and dichromatic. ; $context$ = sent1: the socle is a medlar if there is something such that that it does comfort orderliness and is an italic is incorrect. sent2: if the papaya does not comfort herringbone then it is not myelic. sent3: if the papaya is a medlar then it does birdie. sent4: the papaya does not comfort herringbone if there is something such that that it does draw respite is not false. sent5: if there is something such that it is not an italic the socle is a medlar. sent6: if the fact that the socle is not a kind of a medlar hold that the papaya does birdie and it is dichromatic is not right. sent7: the socle is an italic. sent8: there is something such that it comforts orderliness and is a kind of an italic. sent9: if the fact that the socle is a medlar is true then it is a kind of a Nevada. sent10: that something is a birdie that is dichromatic does not hold if that it is not a kind of a medlar is correct. sent11: the papaya does comfort orderliness and is not a austenite. sent12: if the socle is a kind of a Nevada then it draws respite. sent13: the papaya is not non-dichromatic. sent14: the papaya birdies but it is not myelic if it does not comfort herringbone. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it comforts orderliness and it is a kind of an italic is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent1 -> int1: the socle is a medlar.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the socle is a Nevada.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the socle draws respite.; int3 -> int4: something draws respite.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the papaya does not comfort herringbone.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the papaya is a birdie but it is not myelic.; int6 -> int7: the papaya is a kind of a birdie.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__