that the phalanx is non-corvine thing that is not a fistula is not true.
sent1: if the phalanx does not shatter Reformation that it is both not corvine and not a fistula is not right. sent2: the fact that something does not weld Rand hold if that it is an anglophile and it weld Rand is not correct. sent3: if the services owes and/or it does not weld Rand then the fur-piece shatters sacrament. sent4: if the services does not weld Rand that the fact that the fur-piece does not shatter sacrament hold is false. sent5: something does owe if it does not frisk. sent6: the services is a groove if there exists something such that it does not weld Rand. sent7: if the finish is not optical the services is not a frisk and/or it does not shatter sacrament. sent8: if something is not a groove it does owe and/or it does not weld Rand. sent9: the fur-piece frisks. sent10: the fur-piece does not shatter sacrament if it is a kind of a frisk. sent11: if something does shatter Reformation and it necks then the fact that the services is not a kind of a groove is not false. sent12: the fact that the phalanx is corvine but not a fistula is incorrect if it does not shatter Reformation. sent13: the finish is not optical if that the ferritin is not a kind of a fade but it is optical does not hold. sent14: the fact that the phalanx is non-corvine thing that is a fistula does not hold. sent15: something does not shatter Reformation if it is a groove and is a necked. sent16: there is something such that it does shatter Reformation. sent17: the fact that the ferritin is not a fade but optical is false. sent18: if something owes it is a necked. sent19: if the fact that the phalanx does not shatter Reformation is right then the fact that it is not corvine and it is a kind of a fistula is wrong. sent20: the phalanx is non-corvine and it is not a fistula if the services does not shatter Reformation. sent21: if that something does not syllogize hold then the fact that it is a kind of an anglophile that welds Rand is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phalanx shatters Reformation.; sent8 -> int1: the services does owe or it does not weld Rand or both if it is not a kind of a groove.; sent10 & sent9 -> int2: the fur-piece does not shatter sacrament.;
that the phalanx is non-corvine thing that is not a fistula is not wrong.
sent15 -> int3: the services does not shatter Reformation if it is a kind of a groove and it necks.; sent2 -> int4: the fact that the fur-piece does not weld Rand hold if the fact that it is an anglophile and weld Rand is not true.; sent21 -> int5: the fact that the fur-piece is an anglophile and it welds Rand is wrong if it does not syllogize.; sent18 -> int6: if the fact that the services owes hold then it is a kind of a necked.; sent13 & sent17 -> int7: the finish is not optical.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: either the services does not frisk or it does not shatter sacrament or both.; sent5 -> int9: if the services is not a frisk it owes.;
$hypothesis$ = that the phalanx is non-corvine thing that is not a fistula is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the phalanx does not shatter Reformation that it is both not corvine and not a fistula is not right. sent2: the fact that something does not weld Rand hold if that it is an anglophile and it weld Rand is not correct. sent3: if the services owes and/or it does not weld Rand then the fur-piece shatters sacrament. sent4: if the services does not weld Rand that the fact that the fur-piece does not shatter sacrament hold is false. sent5: something does owe if it does not frisk. sent6: the services is a groove if there exists something such that it does not weld Rand. sent7: if the finish is not optical the services is not a frisk and/or it does not shatter sacrament. sent8: if something is not a groove it does owe and/or it does not weld Rand. sent9: the fur-piece frisks. sent10: the fur-piece does not shatter sacrament if it is a kind of a frisk. sent11: if something does shatter Reformation and it necks then the fact that the services is not a kind of a groove is not false. sent12: the fact that the phalanx is corvine but not a fistula is incorrect if it does not shatter Reformation. sent13: the finish is not optical if that the ferritin is not a kind of a fade but it is optical does not hold. sent14: the fact that the phalanx is non-corvine thing that is a fistula does not hold. sent15: something does not shatter Reformation if it is a groove and is a necked. sent16: there is something such that it does shatter Reformation. sent17: the fact that the ferritin is not a fade but optical is false. sent18: if something owes it is a necked. sent19: if the fact that the phalanx does not shatter Reformation is right then the fact that it is not corvine and it is a kind of a fistula is wrong. sent20: the phalanx is non-corvine and it is not a fistula if the services does not shatter Reformation. sent21: if that something does not syllogize hold then the fact that it is a kind of an anglophile that welds Rand is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the phalanx shatters Reformation.; sent8 -> int1: the services does owe or it does not weld Rand or both if it is not a kind of a groove.; sent10 & sent9 -> int2: the fur-piece does not shatter sacrament.; __UNKNOWN__