that the Vermonter is not nonjudgmental and is exegetic does not hold.
sent1: the Vermonter is exegetic. sent2: The BS does not mask gooseflesh. sent3: the gooseflesh is not a kind of a Orizaba if it does not mask BS. sent4: if the peanuts is not a fiftieth then the Vermonter is exegetic. sent5: if something is not aerological then it does mask two-dimensionality and it is a fiftieth. sent6: if the peanuts masks two-dimensionality then the landowner is aerological but it does not mask by-and-by. sent7: the Vermonter is non-aerological thing that is a Orizaba if the landowner is not exegetic. sent8: the Vermonter is not nonjudgmental but exegetic if the peanuts is not a kind of a fiftieth. sent9: the landowner does not mask by-and-by if the peanuts masks two-dimensionality. sent10: that the landowner is not non-aerological and it does mask by-and-by is not true. sent11: the second is non-aerological if the peanuts does mask by-and-by and/or is not non-aerological. sent12: the landowner is nonjudgmental. sent13: that the landowner does not mask by-and-by is right. sent14: the peanuts is not exegetic but it does jam milkshake. sent15: the gooseflesh does not mask BS. sent16: that something is judgmental thing that is exegetic does not hold if it is a fiftieth. sent17: something does mask by-and-by and/or it is not aerological if it is not exegetic. sent18: the landowner does not mask Ariadne and is a kind of a Tahitian. sent19: that the fact that the landowner is aerological but it does not mask by-and-by is not correct hold if the gooseflesh is not a Orizaba. sent20: something is nonjudgmental and is not diaphoretic if it is a fiftieth. sent21: the peanuts masks two-dimensionality if it is a fiftieth. sent22: the fact that that the landowner is aerological and masks by-and-by is not true hold if the gooseflesh is not a Orizaba.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the peanuts is a fiftieth hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the peanuts masks two-dimensionality.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the landowner is aerological thing that does not mask by-and-by.; sent3 & sent15 -> int3: the gooseflesh is not a Orizaba.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: that the landowner is a kind of aerological thing that does not mask by-and-by is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the peanuts is not a fiftieth.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the second is nonjudgmental but it is not diaphoretic.
sent20 -> int7: if the second is a kind of a fiftieth it is nonjudgmental and it is not a kind of a diaphoretic.; sent5 -> int8: if the second is not aerological then it does mask two-dimensionality and it is a fiftieth.; sent17 -> int9: if the peanuts is not exegetic then it does mask by-and-by or it is not aerological or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Vermonter is not nonjudgmental and is exegetic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the Vermonter is exegetic. sent2: The BS does not mask gooseflesh. sent3: the gooseflesh is not a kind of a Orizaba if it does not mask BS. sent4: if the peanuts is not a fiftieth then the Vermonter is exegetic. sent5: if something is not aerological then it does mask two-dimensionality and it is a fiftieth. sent6: if the peanuts masks two-dimensionality then the landowner is aerological but it does not mask by-and-by. sent7: the Vermonter is non-aerological thing that is a Orizaba if the landowner is not exegetic. sent8: the Vermonter is not nonjudgmental but exegetic if the peanuts is not a kind of a fiftieth. sent9: the landowner does not mask by-and-by if the peanuts masks two-dimensionality. sent10: that the landowner is not non-aerological and it does mask by-and-by is not true. sent11: the second is non-aerological if the peanuts does mask by-and-by and/or is not non-aerological. sent12: the landowner is nonjudgmental. sent13: that the landowner does not mask by-and-by is right. sent14: the peanuts is not exegetic but it does jam milkshake. sent15: the gooseflesh does not mask BS. sent16: that something is judgmental thing that is exegetic does not hold if it is a fiftieth. sent17: something does mask by-and-by and/or it is not aerological if it is not exegetic. sent18: the landowner does not mask Ariadne and is a kind of a Tahitian. sent19: that the fact that the landowner is aerological but it does not mask by-and-by is not correct hold if the gooseflesh is not a Orizaba. sent20: something is nonjudgmental and is not diaphoretic if it is a fiftieth. sent21: the peanuts masks two-dimensionality if it is a fiftieth. sent22: the fact that that the landowner is aerological and masks by-and-by is not true hold if the gooseflesh is not a Orizaba. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the peanuts is a fiftieth hold.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the peanuts masks two-dimensionality.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the landowner is aerological thing that does not mask by-and-by.; sent3 & sent15 -> int3: the gooseflesh is not a Orizaba.; sent19 & int3 -> int4: that the landowner is a kind of aerological thing that does not mask by-and-by is not correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the peanuts is not a fiftieth.; int6 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__