the twilight occurs.
sent1: that the salient does not occur and the theophany does not occur yields that the twilight does not occur. sent2: the fact that the appropriating filer happens is correct if the fact that the appropriating filer does not occur but the salutatory occurs does not hold. sent3: the garlickiness happens but the Doctor does not occur. sent4: that both the theophany and the growl happens brings about that the skipping unnoticeableness does not occur. sent5: if that that both the appropriating hazardousness and the assertion happens is false hold then the fact that the bleating does not occur is true. sent6: the fact that both the skipping unnoticeableness and the non-knee-lengthness occurs is not incorrect if the bleating does not occur. sent7: if the assertion does not occur then the twilight happens. sent8: if the powerlessness happens the Doctor happens. sent9: that the fact that the garlickiness does not occur and the rise does not occur does not hold is not incorrect if the appropriating filer happens. sent10: the appropriating hazardousness happens. sent11: if the growl does not occur that both the appropriating hazardousness and the bleat occurs is false. sent12: the chimericalness and the appropriating Nero happens if the Doctor does not occur. sent13: the assertion does not occur if that both the appropriating hazardousness and the bleating occurs is not true. sent14: the salutatory does not occur and the tossup does not occur. sent15: the theophany occurs if that the salient happens hold. sent16: if the unbrokenness happens the theophany does not occur and the growl does not occur. sent17: if the appropriating Nero does not occur that both the appropriating hazardousness and the assertion happens is not true. sent18: that the appropriating filer does not occur but the salutatory happens is not true. sent19: the unbrokenness does not occur if the chimericalness occurs. sent20: that the salientness happens is not false. sent21: that the unbrokenness happens but the bleating does not occur is not correct if the appropriating hazardousness occurs. sent22: if the Doctor does not occur then the appropriating Nero occurs. sent23: that the non-unbrokenness and the non-knee-lengthness occurs is not true if the skipping unnoticeableness does not occur.
sent15 & sent20 -> int1: the theophany occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the growl happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the theophany occurs and the growl occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the skipping unnoticeableness does not occur hold.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: that the non-unbrokenness and the non-knee-lengthness occurs does not hold.; sent3 -> int5: the Doctor does not occur.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the chimericalness and the appropriating Nero occurs.; int6 -> int7: the chimericalness occurs.;
the indispensableness occurs.
sent21 & sent10 -> int8: the fact that the unbrokenness happens but the bleat does not occur does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the twilight occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the salient does not occur and the theophany does not occur yields that the twilight does not occur. sent2: the fact that the appropriating filer happens is correct if the fact that the appropriating filer does not occur but the salutatory occurs does not hold. sent3: the garlickiness happens but the Doctor does not occur. sent4: that both the theophany and the growl happens brings about that the skipping unnoticeableness does not occur. sent5: if that that both the appropriating hazardousness and the assertion happens is false hold then the fact that the bleating does not occur is true. sent6: the fact that both the skipping unnoticeableness and the non-knee-lengthness occurs is not incorrect if the bleating does not occur. sent7: if the assertion does not occur then the twilight happens. sent8: if the powerlessness happens the Doctor happens. sent9: that the fact that the garlickiness does not occur and the rise does not occur does not hold is not incorrect if the appropriating filer happens. sent10: the appropriating hazardousness happens. sent11: if the growl does not occur that both the appropriating hazardousness and the bleat occurs is false. sent12: the chimericalness and the appropriating Nero happens if the Doctor does not occur. sent13: the assertion does not occur if that both the appropriating hazardousness and the bleating occurs is not true. sent14: the salutatory does not occur and the tossup does not occur. sent15: the theophany occurs if that the salient happens hold. sent16: if the unbrokenness happens the theophany does not occur and the growl does not occur. sent17: if the appropriating Nero does not occur that both the appropriating hazardousness and the assertion happens is not true. sent18: that the appropriating filer does not occur but the salutatory happens is not true. sent19: the unbrokenness does not occur if the chimericalness occurs. sent20: that the salientness happens is not false. sent21: that the unbrokenness happens but the bleating does not occur is not correct if the appropriating hazardousness occurs. sent22: if the Doctor does not occur then the appropriating Nero occurs. sent23: that the non-unbrokenness and the non-knee-lengthness occurs is not true if the skipping unnoticeableness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent20 -> int1: the theophany occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the growl happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the theophany occurs and the growl occurs.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: that the skipping unnoticeableness does not occur hold.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: that the non-unbrokenness and the non-knee-lengthness occurs does not hold.; sent3 -> int5: the Doctor does not occur.; sent12 & int5 -> int6: the chimericalness and the appropriating Nero occurs.; int6 -> int7: the chimericalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__