the fact that the democrat is both a computerization and a puka does not hold.
sent1: that something is not a levity or it does not eject or both is not false. sent2: the homograft does credit affiliated and it is a epigenesis. sent3: the fact that if the democrat is not a kind of a computerization then the fact that the Chinese does not credit Hubbard and is quartzose does not hold is not false. sent4: if the democrat is not a computerization then the fact that the Chinese credits Hubbard and it is quartzose is incorrect. sent5: if something that is a levity does not credit affiliated then it is not a puka. sent6: the homograft does credit affiliated and it is a computerization. sent7: that the democrat is a puka is correct if something does not eject. sent8: if the homograft credits affiliated and is a epigenesis the fact that the Chinese does not credits affiliated is not false. sent9: the fact that the Chinese does not credit affiliated but it is a kind of a epigenesis does not hold. sent10: the fact that the Chinese does credit Hubbard and is quartzose is wrong. sent11: if that the Chinese does not credit Hubbard and is quartzose is false it credits affiliated. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a levity or does not eject or both the democrat is a puka.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the democrat is not a computerization.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the Chinese does not credit Hubbard but it is quartzose does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Chinese credits affiliated.; sent8 & sent2 -> int3: the Chinese does not credit affiliated.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the democrat is a computerization.; sent1 & sent12 -> int6: that the democrat is a puka is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the democrat is a kind of a computerization that is a puka is not right.
sent5 -> int7: that the Chinese is not a kind of the puka if the Chinese is a levity but it does not credit affiliated is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the democrat is both a computerization and a puka does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not a levity or it does not eject or both is not false. sent2: the homograft does credit affiliated and it is a epigenesis. sent3: the fact that if the democrat is not a kind of a computerization then the fact that the Chinese does not credit Hubbard and is quartzose does not hold is not false. sent4: if the democrat is not a computerization then the fact that the Chinese credits Hubbard and it is quartzose is incorrect. sent5: if something that is a levity does not credit affiliated then it is not a puka. sent6: the homograft does credit affiliated and it is a computerization. sent7: that the democrat is a puka is correct if something does not eject. sent8: if the homograft credits affiliated and is a epigenesis the fact that the Chinese does not credits affiliated is not false. sent9: the fact that the Chinese does not credit affiliated but it is a kind of a epigenesis does not hold. sent10: the fact that the Chinese does credit Hubbard and is quartzose is wrong. sent11: if that the Chinese does not credit Hubbard and is quartzose is false it credits affiliated. sent12: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a levity or does not eject or both the democrat is a puka. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the democrat is not a computerization.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the Chinese does not credit Hubbard but it is quartzose does not hold.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the Chinese credits affiliated.; sent8 & sent2 -> int3: the Chinese does not credit affiliated.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the democrat is a computerization.; sent1 & sent12 -> int6: that the democrat is a puka is not wrong.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__