the Spandau is carroty.
sent1: the fact that the rugulah is not Platonistic and is not a kind of a kanchil is false if the Argive is not a Merrimack. sent2: something is a kanchil if that it is not Platonistic and it is not a kind of a kanchil is not correct. sent3: the nucleoside is a kind of a Merrimack. sent4: the househusband is thematic and it is cousinly. sent5: if the nucleoside does not caucus Calypso the cognate does caucus Calypso. sent6: if the Argive is not pictographic the cognate caucuses Calypso but it is not pictographic. sent7: the Kleenex is carroty. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a Merrimack then the Argive is Platonistic and it is a kind of a kanchil. sent9: if something is Platonistic and it is a kanchil then it is not pictographic. sent10: the househusband is blastemal if it is thematic. sent11: if the househusband is blastemal the cognate is apicultural. sent12: if the cognate does caucus Calypso and it is apicultural the rugulah is not a liniment.
sent3 -> int1: something is a Merrimack.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the Argive is both Platonistic and a kanchil.; sent9 -> int3: the Argive is not pictographic if it is Platonistic a kanchil.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Argive is not pictographic.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the cognate caucuses Calypso but it is not pictographic.; int5 -> int6: the cognate does caucus Calypso.; sent4 -> int7: the househusband is thematic.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the househusband is blastemal.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the cognate is apicultural.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the cognate caucuses Calypso and is apicultural.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the rugulah is not a liniment.;
the rugulah is a kanchil.
sent2 -> int12: the rugulah is a kanchil if that it is non-Platonistic thing that is not a kanchil is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Spandau is carroty. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the rugulah is not Platonistic and is not a kind of a kanchil is false if the Argive is not a Merrimack. sent2: something is a kanchil if that it is not Platonistic and it is not a kind of a kanchil is not correct. sent3: the nucleoside is a kind of a Merrimack. sent4: the househusband is thematic and it is cousinly. sent5: if the nucleoside does not caucus Calypso the cognate does caucus Calypso. sent6: if the Argive is not pictographic the cognate caucuses Calypso but it is not pictographic. sent7: the Kleenex is carroty. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a Merrimack then the Argive is Platonistic and it is a kind of a kanchil. sent9: if something is Platonistic and it is a kanchil then it is not pictographic. sent10: the househusband is blastemal if it is thematic. sent11: if the househusband is blastemal the cognate is apicultural. sent12: if the cognate does caucus Calypso and it is apicultural the rugulah is not a liniment. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: something is a Merrimack.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the Argive is both Platonistic and a kanchil.; sent9 -> int3: the Argive is not pictographic if it is Platonistic a kanchil.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the Argive is not pictographic.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the cognate caucuses Calypso but it is not pictographic.; int5 -> int6: the cognate does caucus Calypso.; sent4 -> int7: the househusband is thematic.; sent10 & int7 -> int8: the househusband is blastemal.; sent11 & int8 -> int9: the cognate is apicultural.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the cognate caucuses Calypso and is apicultural.; int10 & sent12 -> int11: the rugulah is not a liniment.; __UNKNOWN__