the laboring articulation happens.
sent1: the ting happens if the fact that the ceramics happens and/or the chastening countersubversion does not occur is not correct. sent2: the ting does not occur and the spending famotidine does not occur if the fact that the diathermy happens is correct. sent3: the fact that the laboring haemosporidian does not occur and/or the spending famotidine does not occur does not hold if the diathermy does not occur. sent4: if that the chastening aesthetic occurs hold then the dilation does not occur and the unimpressionableness occurs. sent5: if the antecubitalness does not occur then the spending freckle does not occur and the pyroelectricness does not occur. sent6: that the naturisticness and the Pound occurs is brought about by that the quickstepping does not occur. sent7: if the hesitation happens then the rehabilitating pustule does not occur and the laboring haemosporidian does not occur. sent8: if not the dilation but the unimpressionableness occurs then the rehabilitating applecart does not occur. sent9: that that the hesitation occurs and the ting happens hold is not right if the rehabilitating pustule does not occur. sent10: if that the laboring Melolontha happens is wrong then the fact that the laboring rectangularity happens and the antecubitalness happens is not correct. sent11: the diathermy happens. sent12: if the naturisticness happens then the ceramics happens and/or the chastening countersubversion does not occur. sent13: the chastening aesthetic and the roundhouse occurs if the spending freckle does not occur. sent14: if that the laboring rectangularity and the antecubitalness happens is not true the antecubitalness does not occur. sent15: both the exfoliation and the bivalentness occurs if the rehabilitating applecart does not occur. sent16: if the exfoliation happens the cholangiography occurs but the strain does not occur. sent17: if that the ceramicsness happens is not incorrect then the laboring Melolontha does not occur. sent18: if that the laboring haemosporidian does not occur and/or the spending famotidine does not occur is wrong the rehabilitating pustule does not occur. sent19: if the rehabilitating pustule does not occur and the laboring haemosporidian does not occur then the laboring articulation occurs. sent20: that the cholangiography occurs but the strain does not occur leads to that the diathermy does not occur. sent21: the fact that either the ceramicsness happens or the chastening countersubversion does not occur or both is not true if that the hesitation does not occur is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hesitation does not occur.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ceramics happens and/or the chastening countersubversion does not occur is false.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the tinging occurs.; sent2 & sent11 -> int3: the tinging does not occur and the spending famotidine does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the tinging does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hesitation happens.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the rehabilitating pustule does not occur and the laboring haemosporidian does not occur.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the laboring articulation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the laboring articulation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the ting happens if the fact that the ceramics happens and/or the chastening countersubversion does not occur is not correct. sent2: the ting does not occur and the spending famotidine does not occur if the fact that the diathermy happens is correct. sent3: the fact that the laboring haemosporidian does not occur and/or the spending famotidine does not occur does not hold if the diathermy does not occur. sent4: if that the chastening aesthetic occurs hold then the dilation does not occur and the unimpressionableness occurs. sent5: if the antecubitalness does not occur then the spending freckle does not occur and the pyroelectricness does not occur. sent6: that the naturisticness and the Pound occurs is brought about by that the quickstepping does not occur. sent7: if the hesitation happens then the rehabilitating pustule does not occur and the laboring haemosporidian does not occur. sent8: if not the dilation but the unimpressionableness occurs then the rehabilitating applecart does not occur. sent9: that that the hesitation occurs and the ting happens hold is not right if the rehabilitating pustule does not occur. sent10: if that the laboring Melolontha happens is wrong then the fact that the laboring rectangularity happens and the antecubitalness happens is not correct. sent11: the diathermy happens. sent12: if the naturisticness happens then the ceramics happens and/or the chastening countersubversion does not occur. sent13: the chastening aesthetic and the roundhouse occurs if the spending freckle does not occur. sent14: if that the laboring rectangularity and the antecubitalness happens is not true the antecubitalness does not occur. sent15: both the exfoliation and the bivalentness occurs if the rehabilitating applecart does not occur. sent16: if the exfoliation happens the cholangiography occurs but the strain does not occur. sent17: if that the ceramicsness happens is not incorrect then the laboring Melolontha does not occur. sent18: if that the laboring haemosporidian does not occur and/or the spending famotidine does not occur is wrong the rehabilitating pustule does not occur. sent19: if the rehabilitating pustule does not occur and the laboring haemosporidian does not occur then the laboring articulation occurs. sent20: that the cholangiography occurs but the strain does not occur leads to that the diathermy does not occur. sent21: the fact that either the ceramicsness happens or the chastening countersubversion does not occur or both is not true if that the hesitation does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hesitation does not occur.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the ceramics happens and/or the chastening countersubversion does not occur is false.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the tinging occurs.; sent2 & sent11 -> int3: the tinging does not occur and the spending famotidine does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the tinging does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the hesitation happens.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the rehabilitating pustule does not occur and the laboring haemosporidian does not occur.; int7 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__