something is not a bangle and it is not an exercise.
sent1: that the bolo does not erase descant and is a Banjul is false. sent2: the bolo is not a kind of a littoral if it is microeconomics and is glabellar. sent3: if the bolo is not a kind of a Banjul it does not blackmail mashie. sent4: the silverware is not glabellar. sent5: the fact that the bolo is not late and it does not erase aired is wrong. sent6: the bolo is not microeconomics. sent7: something is not a kind of a bangle. sent8: the stick does not exercise but it is a littoral if that it is a bangle is not wrong. sent9: something does erase descant but it is not glabellar. sent10: something is not littoral if it is microeconomics and it is glabellar. sent11: that the bolo does not erase descant and is not a Banjul is wrong. sent12: there is something such that it is not a probe and it is not a organdy. sent13: if the fact that the bolo does not erase descant and is not a Banjul is wrong then it is not a bangle. sent14: the bolo is a kind of non-microeconomics thing that is glabellar. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a littoral and it is a Banjul. sent16: if something is not a bangle but littoral then it is not a kind of a Banjul. sent17: that the bolo is a homebuilder is not correct. sent18: the bolo is not a maraschino. sent19: there exists something such that it is not a bangle and it is an exercise. sent20: something that is a kind of non-microeconomics thing that is glabellar is not a littoral.
sent20 -> int1: that the bolo is not a littoral is true if it is not microeconomics and is glabellar.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the bolo is not littoral is not false.; sent13 & sent11 -> int3: the bolo is not a bangle.;
the fact that something is not a elephant's-foot and does not erase digestibility is true.
$hypothesis$ = something is not a bangle and it is not an exercise. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bolo does not erase descant and is a Banjul is false. sent2: the bolo is not a kind of a littoral if it is microeconomics and is glabellar. sent3: if the bolo is not a kind of a Banjul it does not blackmail mashie. sent4: the silverware is not glabellar. sent5: the fact that the bolo is not late and it does not erase aired is wrong. sent6: the bolo is not microeconomics. sent7: something is not a kind of a bangle. sent8: the stick does not exercise but it is a littoral if that it is a bangle is not wrong. sent9: something does erase descant but it is not glabellar. sent10: something is not littoral if it is microeconomics and it is glabellar. sent11: that the bolo does not erase descant and is not a Banjul is wrong. sent12: there is something such that it is not a probe and it is not a organdy. sent13: if the fact that the bolo does not erase descant and is not a Banjul is wrong then it is not a bangle. sent14: the bolo is a kind of non-microeconomics thing that is glabellar. sent15: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a littoral and it is a Banjul. sent16: if something is not a bangle but littoral then it is not a kind of a Banjul. sent17: that the bolo is a homebuilder is not correct. sent18: the bolo is not a maraschino. sent19: there exists something such that it is not a bangle and it is an exercise. sent20: something that is a kind of non-microeconomics thing that is glabellar is not a littoral. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 -> int1: that the bolo is not a littoral is true if it is not microeconomics and is glabellar.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the fact that the bolo is not littoral is not false.; sent13 & sent11 -> int3: the bolo is not a bangle.; __UNKNOWN__