either the alumnus does unveil or it is synoptic or both.
sent1: that the javelin is not synoptic is correct. sent2: the clay is not synoptic. sent3: the forecastle does not override Bayard. sent4: The Bayard does not override forecastle. sent5: there is something such that it is not a seashore and it is a stemmatology. sent6: if the forecastle is semi-tuberous but it does not override Bayard it does not unveil. sent7: there exists something such that it is not semi-tuberous and it does unveil. sent8: the woodcut does not override mollusk if that it does override mollusk and is a kind of a lowerclassman is false. sent9: the forecastle is semi-tuberous if a seashore is a stemmatology. sent10: the forecastle is semi-tuberous if something is non-synoptic but it unveils. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a seashore. sent12: if the alumnus is a kind of synoptic thing that does not override Bayard then the fact that it does not unveil is correct. sent13: the forecastle unveils if either the alumnus is not a fingermark or it does unveils or both. sent14: if the fact that something is not semi-tuberous or it does not override Bayard or both does not hold then it is synoptic. sent15: if the alumnus unveils and is non-semi-tuberous it is not synoptic. sent16: the blackface does not override Bayard if the fact that the woodcut is not a laugh and not a fingermark is wrong. sent17: if the forecastle does not unveil the alumnus unveil and/or it is synoptic. sent18: the forecastle is a kind of a gyrfalcon that does not brazen stickball. sent19: if something does not override mollusk then that it is both not a laugh and not a fingermark does not hold. sent20: the forecastle is semi-tuberous if there is something such that it is not a seashore and it is a stemmatology.
sent5 & sent20 -> int1: the forecastle is semi-tuberous.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the forecastle is semi-tuberous but it does not override Bayard is not incorrect.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the forecastle does not unveil.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the alumnus unveils and/or it is synoptic is not correct.
sent19 -> int4: if the woodcut does not override mollusk that it is not a kind of a laugh and it is not a kind of a fingermark is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = either the alumnus does unveil or it is synoptic or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the javelin is not synoptic is correct. sent2: the clay is not synoptic. sent3: the forecastle does not override Bayard. sent4: The Bayard does not override forecastle. sent5: there is something such that it is not a seashore and it is a stemmatology. sent6: if the forecastle is semi-tuberous but it does not override Bayard it does not unveil. sent7: there exists something such that it is not semi-tuberous and it does unveil. sent8: the woodcut does not override mollusk if that it does override mollusk and is a kind of a lowerclassman is false. sent9: the forecastle is semi-tuberous if a seashore is a stemmatology. sent10: the forecastle is semi-tuberous if something is non-synoptic but it unveils. sent11: there exists something such that it is not a seashore. sent12: if the alumnus is a kind of synoptic thing that does not override Bayard then the fact that it does not unveil is correct. sent13: the forecastle unveils if either the alumnus is not a fingermark or it does unveils or both. sent14: if the fact that something is not semi-tuberous or it does not override Bayard or both does not hold then it is synoptic. sent15: if the alumnus unveils and is non-semi-tuberous it is not synoptic. sent16: the blackface does not override Bayard if the fact that the woodcut is not a laugh and not a fingermark is wrong. sent17: if the forecastle does not unveil the alumnus unveil and/or it is synoptic. sent18: the forecastle is a kind of a gyrfalcon that does not brazen stickball. sent19: if something does not override mollusk then that it is both not a laugh and not a fingermark does not hold. sent20: the forecastle is semi-tuberous if there is something such that it is not a seashore and it is a stemmatology. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent20 -> int1: the forecastle is semi-tuberous.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: that the forecastle is semi-tuberous but it does not override Bayard is not incorrect.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the forecastle does not unveil.; int3 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__