that if the whip-snake is celiac then the whip-snake either is not a procyonid or is a preceptor or both is not correct.
sent1: if something does not greet arithmetic and does not greet Aaron it is not a preceptor. sent2: if the fact that the aspiration does not greet Argos is correct the fact that it is not a Hirschsprung and it is attritional is not true. sent3: something is interfacial if it is attritional and it is not a Krypterophaneron. sent4: the fact that the space is a preceptor hold. sent5: the synthesis is not a kind of a Krypterophaneron and it is not a kind of a halloo. sent6: if the whip-snake is a kind of a Galbulidae and it is a procyonid then the fact that the aspiration is not interfacial is not false. sent7: the aspiration is not a Krypterophaneron and it is not attritional. sent8: if something is not a kind of a preceptor it is attritional and is not a Krypterophaneron. sent9: the fact that the aspiration greets adder but it is not a Carica is wrong if the fact that it is not a conscientiousness is correct. sent10: the fact that the whip-snake is a kind of non-interfacial thing that is a preceptor does not hold. sent11: the fact that the filter is non-annexational thing that dumps melter is not true. sent12: that the aspiration is not a Krypterophaneron and is not attritional is not right if it is not interfacial. sent13: the fact that that the counterdemonstrator is a Krypterophaneron but it is not a kind of a settlor does not hold is right. sent14: if the filter is a Green the aspiration is a Green. sent15: the aspiration does list malfeasant. sent16: the basil refreshes haler and it is late. sent17: that something is not a procyonid and is not celiac is incorrect if it is interfacial. sent18: if the whip-snake is interfacial it is a procyonid and/or it is celiac. sent19: the whip-snake does not greet arithmetic and it does not greet Aaron if the fact that the aspiration is a kind of a Green is not incorrect. sent20: if the fact that that the filter is non-annexational thing that dumps melter is true is incorrect it is a Green. sent21: the whip-snake is a Galbulidae if it is celiac.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whip-snake is celiac.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the whip-snake is not a Galbulidae is not true is right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whip-snake is a kind of a procyonid.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the whip-snake is a kind of a Galbulidae that is a kind of a procyonid.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the aspiration is not interfacial.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the aspiration is not a Krypterophaneron and is not attritional is not right.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the whip-snake is not a procyonid.; int6 -> int7: either the whip-snake is not a procyonid or it is a preceptor or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the donkey is a Galbulidae.
sent17 -> int8: if the whip-snake is interfacial that the fact that it is not a procyonid and not celiac is not wrong is not right.; sent3 -> int9: the whip-snake is interfacial if it is attritional and is not a Krypterophaneron.; sent8 -> int10: if that the whip-snake is not a preceptor is not wrong it is attritional and it is not a kind of a Krypterophaneron.; sent1 -> int11: if the whip-snake does not greet arithmetic and does not greet Aaron it is not a preceptor.; sent20 & sent11 -> int12: the filter is a kind of a Green.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the aspiration is a Green.; sent19 & int13 -> int14: the whip-snake does not greet arithmetic and does not greet Aaron.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the whip-snake is not a preceptor.; int10 & int15 -> int16: the whip-snake is attritional but it is not a Krypterophaneron.; int9 & int16 -> int17: the whip-snake is interfacial.; int8 & int17 -> int18: the fact that the whip-snake is not a kind of a procyonid and is not celiac is wrong.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that the fact that it is not a procyonid and it is not celiac is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that if the whip-snake is celiac then the whip-snake either is not a procyonid or is a preceptor or both is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not greet arithmetic and does not greet Aaron it is not a preceptor. sent2: if the fact that the aspiration does not greet Argos is correct the fact that it is not a Hirschsprung and it is attritional is not true. sent3: something is interfacial if it is attritional and it is not a Krypterophaneron. sent4: the fact that the space is a preceptor hold. sent5: the synthesis is not a kind of a Krypterophaneron and it is not a kind of a halloo. sent6: if the whip-snake is a kind of a Galbulidae and it is a procyonid then the fact that the aspiration is not interfacial is not false. sent7: the aspiration is not a Krypterophaneron and it is not attritional. sent8: if something is not a kind of a preceptor it is attritional and is not a Krypterophaneron. sent9: the fact that the aspiration greets adder but it is not a Carica is wrong if the fact that it is not a conscientiousness is correct. sent10: the fact that the whip-snake is a kind of non-interfacial thing that is a preceptor does not hold. sent11: the fact that the filter is non-annexational thing that dumps melter is not true. sent12: that the aspiration is not a Krypterophaneron and is not attritional is not right if it is not interfacial. sent13: the fact that that the counterdemonstrator is a Krypterophaneron but it is not a kind of a settlor does not hold is right. sent14: if the filter is a Green the aspiration is a Green. sent15: the aspiration does list malfeasant. sent16: the basil refreshes haler and it is late. sent17: that something is not a procyonid and is not celiac is incorrect if it is interfacial. sent18: if the whip-snake is interfacial it is a procyonid and/or it is celiac. sent19: the whip-snake does not greet arithmetic and it does not greet Aaron if the fact that the aspiration is a kind of a Green is not incorrect. sent20: if the fact that that the filter is non-annexational thing that dumps melter is true is incorrect it is a Green. sent21: the whip-snake is a Galbulidae if it is celiac. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whip-snake is celiac.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that that the whip-snake is not a Galbulidae is not true is right.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whip-snake is a kind of a procyonid.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the whip-snake is a kind of a Galbulidae that is a kind of a procyonid.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the aspiration is not interfacial.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the fact that the aspiration is not a Krypterophaneron and is not attritional is not right.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the whip-snake is not a procyonid.; int6 -> int7: either the whip-snake is not a procyonid or it is a preceptor or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__