the Zealot does not bonnet Cimarron but it bonnets poleax.
sent1: if something does not bonnet poleax it is necessary and it is a kind of a blacking. sent2: the fact that the vol-au-vent is endoergic is not incorrect if the Zealot is blacking. sent3: if the fact that the orbitale does not bonnet Kalotermitidae and is a Fauntleroy does not hold the vol-au-vent is not necessary. sent4: if the vol-au-vent is endoergic the sterol aberrates. sent5: if the fact that the pennywhistle aberrates and is an evergreen does not hold the sterol is not endoergic. sent6: the fact that the sterol does bonnet pennywhistle is not wrong if it is not endoergic. sent7: if the pennywhistle is not extragalactic the fact that it aberrates and is an evergreen does not hold. sent8: if the orbitale bonnets Kalotermitidae then the vol-au-vent is not necessary. sent9: the sterol is not non-blacking. sent10: if that the sterol bonnets pennywhistle is not incorrect it is not a blacking. sent11: the pennywhistle does not bonnet pennywhistle if there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-evergreen and it is not extragalactic does not hold. sent12: the Zealot does not bonnet Cimarron and does bonnet poleax if the vol-au-vent is not necessary.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orbitale does not bonnet Kalotermitidae and is a Fauntleroy.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not bonnet Kalotermitidae and is a kind of a Fauntleroy.;
the pennywhistle does not bonnet pennywhistle.
sent1 -> int2: the poleax is a kind of necessary thing that is a kind of a blacking if it does not bonnet poleax.;
$hypothesis$ = the Zealot does not bonnet Cimarron but it bonnets poleax. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not bonnet poleax it is necessary and it is a kind of a blacking. sent2: the fact that the vol-au-vent is endoergic is not incorrect if the Zealot is blacking. sent3: if the fact that the orbitale does not bonnet Kalotermitidae and is a Fauntleroy does not hold the vol-au-vent is not necessary. sent4: if the vol-au-vent is endoergic the sterol aberrates. sent5: if the fact that the pennywhistle aberrates and is an evergreen does not hold the sterol is not endoergic. sent6: the fact that the sterol does bonnet pennywhistle is not wrong if it is not endoergic. sent7: if the pennywhistle is not extragalactic the fact that it aberrates and is an evergreen does not hold. sent8: if the orbitale bonnets Kalotermitidae then the vol-au-vent is not necessary. sent9: the sterol is not non-blacking. sent10: if that the sterol bonnets pennywhistle is not incorrect it is not a blacking. sent11: the pennywhistle does not bonnet pennywhistle if there exists something such that the fact that it is not non-evergreen and it is not extragalactic does not hold. sent12: the Zealot does not bonnet Cimarron and does bonnet poleax if the vol-au-vent is not necessary. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orbitale does not bonnet Kalotermitidae and is a Fauntleroy.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it does not bonnet Kalotermitidae and is a kind of a Fauntleroy.; __UNKNOWN__