the fact that there exists something such that if that it is not a conserve and it is omissive is false then it is not a Harefoot is not right.
sent1: the Freemason is a Harefoot if the fact that it is not a conserve and is omissive is not right. sent2: if the outsider is not omissive it does not spring-clean. sent3: if the Freemason is a conserve it is not a Harefoot. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not omissive it is not a kind of a Harefoot. sent5: the Freemason is non-maxillomandibular if it is a kind of non-omissive thing that is a Blennius. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-rental thing that is decisive is not true then it does demineralize weatherliness. sent7: the iconoscope does not sow if it is not omissive. sent8: the Freemason is not a Harefoot if the fact that it is not a conserve and it is omissive is not right. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a conserve but omissive is incorrect it is a Harefoot. sent10: if the fact that something is non-omissive but it is a tenge is not correct then it is not a kind of a fenoprofen. sent11: there is something such that if it is a go the fact that it is nonabsorbent is not right. sent12: if the fact that the Freemason is both a leeward and omissive does not hold it is not spermous. sent13: there is something such that if it does not chance electrosleep and is ophthalmic it does not slenderize. sent14: the maxi is a Myrtus if that it is not figurative and is a conserve is wrong. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a conserve and it is omissive does not hold that it is not a Harefoot is right. sent16: there exists something such that if it does conserve it is not a Harefoot. sent17: the Freemason is not intracranial if it does not sex and does strap Pomoxis.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the Freemason is not a fenoprofen if that it is not omissive and it is a tenge does not hold.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if that it is not a conserve and it is omissive is false then it is not a Harefoot is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the Freemason is a Harefoot if the fact that it is not a conserve and is omissive is not right. sent2: if the outsider is not omissive it does not spring-clean. sent3: if the Freemason is a conserve it is not a Harefoot. sent4: there exists something such that if it is not omissive it is not a kind of a Harefoot. sent5: the Freemason is non-maxillomandibular if it is a kind of non-omissive thing that is a Blennius. sent6: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of non-rental thing that is decisive is not true then it does demineralize weatherliness. sent7: the iconoscope does not sow if it is not omissive. sent8: the Freemason is not a Harefoot if the fact that it is not a conserve and it is omissive is not right. sent9: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a conserve but omissive is incorrect it is a Harefoot. sent10: if the fact that something is non-omissive but it is a tenge is not correct then it is not a kind of a fenoprofen. sent11: there is something such that if it is a go the fact that it is nonabsorbent is not right. sent12: if the fact that the Freemason is both a leeward and omissive does not hold it is not spermous. sent13: there is something such that if it does not chance electrosleep and is ophthalmic it does not slenderize. sent14: the maxi is a Myrtus if that it is not figurative and is a conserve is wrong. sent15: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a conserve and it is omissive does not hold that it is not a Harefoot is right. sent16: there exists something such that if it does conserve it is not a Harefoot. sent17: the Freemason is not intracranial if it does not sex and does strap Pomoxis. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__