the Stayman does not dangle pollination and/or it does not guggle liberalism.
sent1: if the Stayman is gastrointestinal the fact that it is both a snicker and not a larboard is not true. sent2: the Stayman is not a songster or it does not wait or both. sent3: that the subjugator is basaltic thing that is not a hike is not true. sent4: if that something dangles stinginess and is not a Larix is wrong then it does not dangle pollination. sent5: the Stayman is a kind of a stovepipe. sent6: that the Stayman is both a formal and not lentic is not correct. sent7: either the vacancy does not copper or it does dangle stinginess or both.
sent4 -> int1: if that that the Stayman dangles stinginess but it is not a Larix does not hold hold then it does not dangle pollination.;
$hypothesis$ = the Stayman does not dangle pollination and/or it does not guggle liberalism. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Stayman is gastrointestinal the fact that it is both a snicker and not a larboard is not true. sent2: the Stayman is not a songster or it does not wait or both. sent3: that the subjugator is basaltic thing that is not a hike is not true. sent4: if that something dangles stinginess and is not a Larix is wrong then it does not dangle pollination. sent5: the Stayman is a kind of a stovepipe. sent6: that the Stayman is both a formal and not lentic is not correct. sent7: either the vacancy does not copper or it does dangle stinginess or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if that that the Stayman dangles stinginess but it is not a Larix does not hold hold then it does not dangle pollination.; __UNKNOWN__