there exists something such that if it is an abeyance then that it is non-gestational thing that is unappealable is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does injure the fact that it is not a buckeye and it is frivolous is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an abeyance it is not gestational and it is unappealable. sent3: there is something such that if it is musculoskeletal then the fact that it is not mammary but lunisolar is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ventral then the fact that it is not a kingfish and is a Cornell does not hold. sent5: the fact that the mass does not hype 1850s and is Ghanaian is not correct if it is pyrographic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a macebearer then the fact that it is not nonlinear and it is a Powhatan is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it stratifies bow-wow that it is not eugenics and it does pedal is not right. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Aeolian is true then that it is both not a bordelaise and a macebearer is false. sent9: if the bow-wow is an abeyance it is non-gestational thing that is unappealable. sent10: that something is not a kind of an abeyance and does volatilize is wrong if that it is a imidazole is not wrong. sent11: if the bow-wow does stratify Hippotragus that it is not a kind of a tuna and is unappealable is not correct. sent12: if the bow-wow is a margarine the fact that it is non-gestational and it does injure is wrong. sent13: if the bow-wow is an abeyance then that it is gestational and it is unappealable does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it is an abeyance that it is gestational and it is unappealable does not hold. sent15: if the bow-wow is an abeyance then that it is both non-gestational and unappealable is not right. sent16: that the bow-wow is not earthy but it is unappealable is wrong if it is nihilistic. sent17: there is something such that if it is an evangelism then that it is not magnetic and is a elemi is not right.
sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the declinometer is not an abeyance but it volatilizes does not hold if that it is a imidazole is not incorrect.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is an abeyance then that it is non-gestational thing that is unappealable is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does injure the fact that it is not a buckeye and it is frivolous is not true. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a kind of an abeyance it is not gestational and it is unappealable. sent3: there is something such that if it is musculoskeletal then the fact that it is not mammary but lunisolar is not correct. sent4: there exists something such that if it is ventral then the fact that it is not a kingfish and is a Cornell does not hold. sent5: the fact that the mass does not hype 1850s and is Ghanaian is not correct if it is pyrographic. sent6: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a macebearer then the fact that it is not nonlinear and it is a Powhatan is wrong. sent7: there exists something such that if it stratifies bow-wow that it is not eugenics and it does pedal is not right. sent8: there is something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a Aeolian is true then that it is both not a bordelaise and a macebearer is false. sent9: if the bow-wow is an abeyance it is non-gestational thing that is unappealable. sent10: that something is not a kind of an abeyance and does volatilize is wrong if that it is a imidazole is not wrong. sent11: if the bow-wow does stratify Hippotragus that it is not a kind of a tuna and is unappealable is not correct. sent12: if the bow-wow is a margarine the fact that it is non-gestational and it does injure is wrong. sent13: if the bow-wow is an abeyance then that it is gestational and it is unappealable does not hold. sent14: there exists something such that if it is an abeyance that it is gestational and it is unappealable does not hold. sent15: if the bow-wow is an abeyance then that it is both non-gestational and unappealable is not right. sent16: that the bow-wow is not earthy but it is unappealable is wrong if it is nihilistic. sent17: there is something such that if it is an evangelism then that it is not magnetic and is a elemi is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__