the stogy is not a kind of a guano.
sent1: that the house is not impotent but it is intracranial is not true. sent2: if the stogy is not intracranial the fact that the house is not impotent but it is intracranial does not hold. sent3: if that the stogy is acoustics is right it is a Sweden. sent4: something is a kind of a trazodone that does crumble Rankine if that it is not associative is not false. sent5: if that the stogy is not an acoustics but it does crumble meltdown is incorrect it is a kind of a Sweden. sent6: the stogy is not intracranial if it is a Sweden. sent7: the house does crumble Rankine if it is not associative. sent8: the house is non-acoustics. sent9: if the meltdown is not a guano then that it is impotent or it is a kind of a trazodone or both does not hold. sent10: the colonnade does crumble Rankine. sent11: that the stogy is acoustics and does crumble meltdown is false. sent12: if the stogy is non-intracranial the fact that the house is not impotent and it is not non-intracranial does not hold. sent13: something does crumble Rankine if it is not associative. sent14: if that something is not intracranial and is a trazodone is false the fact that it is intracranial is right. sent15: the stogy is not acoustics. sent16: the meltdown is impotent. sent17: the house is not a Sweden and/or it crumbles Rankine if there is something such that it does crumbles Rankine. sent18: the house is not associative. sent19: the house crumbles Rankine. sent20: if the house is intracranial it is not a trazodone. sent21: the stogy is intracranial a Sweden if the fact that the colonnade is not a kind of a trazodone is true. sent22: if that the meltdown is impotent or it is a trazodone or both is not right then the colonnade is not a trazodone. sent23: if the fact that something is non-impotent thing that is not intracranial is not correct then it is not a trazodone. sent24: the stogy is a guano if it is an acoustics and it does crumble meltdown. sent25: if the stogy is not an acoustics but it does crumble meltdown then it is a guano. sent26: if something is intracranial then it is not a kind of a trazodone.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the stogy is non-acoustics thing that crumbles meltdown is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the stogy is a Sweden.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the stogy is not intracranial.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that that the house is both potent and not intracranial is not false does not hold.; sent23 -> int4: the house is not a trazodone if the fact that it is both not impotent and not intracranial does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the house is not a trazodone.; sent4 -> int6: the house is a kind of a trazodone and it crumbles Rankine if it is not associative.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the house is a trazodone and it crumbles Rankine.; int7 -> int8: the house is a trazodone.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the stogy is not a kind of an acoustics but it does crumble meltdown.; int10 & sent25 -> hypothesis;
the stogy is not a kind of a guano.
sent10 -> int11: something does crumble Rankine.; int11 & sent17 -> int12: the house is not a Sweden and/or it does crumble Rankine.; sent14 -> int13: the stogy is intracranial if that it is not intracranial and it is a trazodone is not correct.; sent16 -> int14: there are impotent things.;
$hypothesis$ = the stogy is not a kind of a guano. ; $context$ = sent1: that the house is not impotent but it is intracranial is not true. sent2: if the stogy is not intracranial the fact that the house is not impotent but it is intracranial does not hold. sent3: if that the stogy is acoustics is right it is a Sweden. sent4: something is a kind of a trazodone that does crumble Rankine if that it is not associative is not false. sent5: if that the stogy is not an acoustics but it does crumble meltdown is incorrect it is a kind of a Sweden. sent6: the stogy is not intracranial if it is a Sweden. sent7: the house does crumble Rankine if it is not associative. sent8: the house is non-acoustics. sent9: if the meltdown is not a guano then that it is impotent or it is a kind of a trazodone or both does not hold. sent10: the colonnade does crumble Rankine. sent11: that the stogy is acoustics and does crumble meltdown is false. sent12: if the stogy is non-intracranial the fact that the house is not impotent and it is not non-intracranial does not hold. sent13: something does crumble Rankine if it is not associative. sent14: if that something is not intracranial and is a trazodone is false the fact that it is intracranial is right. sent15: the stogy is not acoustics. sent16: the meltdown is impotent. sent17: the house is not a Sweden and/or it crumbles Rankine if there is something such that it does crumbles Rankine. sent18: the house is not associative. sent19: the house crumbles Rankine. sent20: if the house is intracranial it is not a trazodone. sent21: the stogy is intracranial a Sweden if the fact that the colonnade is not a kind of a trazodone is true. sent22: if that the meltdown is impotent or it is a trazodone or both is not right then the colonnade is not a trazodone. sent23: if the fact that something is non-impotent thing that is not intracranial is not correct then it is not a trazodone. sent24: the stogy is a guano if it is an acoustics and it does crumble meltdown. sent25: if the stogy is not an acoustics but it does crumble meltdown then it is a guano. sent26: if something is intracranial then it is not a kind of a trazodone. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the stogy is non-acoustics thing that crumbles meltdown is false.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the stogy is a Sweden.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the stogy is not intracranial.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: that that the house is both potent and not intracranial is not false does not hold.; sent23 -> int4: the house is not a trazodone if the fact that it is both not impotent and not intracranial does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the house is not a trazodone.; sent4 -> int6: the house is a kind of a trazodone and it crumbles Rankine if it is not associative.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the house is a trazodone and it crumbles Rankine.; int7 -> int8: the house is a trazodone.; int5 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the stogy is not a kind of an acoustics but it does crumble meltdown.; int10 & sent25 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__