there is something such that if it is not schizophrenic then it is both a Abelard and a soapiness.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a schizophrenic it is a kind of a soapiness. sent2: something is a Russell and it is a kind of a meadowlark if it does circulate. sent3: the gardener is a Abelard if it is not a fast. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a schizophrenic then it is a kind of a Abelard that is a soapiness. sent5: there is something such that if it is not Coleridgian then it does manhandle Nabu and it is a crow. sent6: something that does not severalize pornography is a Canuck that fledges. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a Erlenmeyer hold it is a pique and a knothole. sent8: something is unalike thing that does manhandle song if it is not an upright. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a schizophrenic it is a kind of a Abelard. sent10: the fact that the gardener is both a Abelard and a soapiness hold if it is a schizophrenic. sent11: that the gardener is matutinal is not wrong if the fact that it does not manhandle Amarillo hold. sent12: if the gardener is not a schizophrenic then the fact that it is a Abelard is not wrong.
there is something such that if it is not an upright it is unalike and does manhandle song.
sent8 -> int1: the confection is unalike and does manhandle song if it is not upright.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not schizophrenic then it is both a Abelard and a soapiness. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a schizophrenic it is a kind of a soapiness. sent2: something is a Russell and it is a kind of a meadowlark if it does circulate. sent3: the gardener is a Abelard if it is not a fast. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a schizophrenic then it is a kind of a Abelard that is a soapiness. sent5: there is something such that if it is not Coleridgian then it does manhandle Nabu and it is a crow. sent6: something that does not severalize pornography is a Canuck that fledges. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is a Erlenmeyer hold it is a pique and a knothole. sent8: something is unalike thing that does manhandle song if it is not an upright. sent9: there exists something such that if it is not a schizophrenic it is a kind of a Abelard. sent10: the fact that the gardener is both a Abelard and a soapiness hold if it is a schizophrenic. sent11: that the gardener is matutinal is not wrong if the fact that it does not manhandle Amarillo hold. sent12: if the gardener is not a schizophrenic then the fact that it is a Abelard is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__