the visionary is not Democratic.
sent1: the visionary is not Democratic if the fact that the mouth is not a hitter but it does dive liquidity is correct. sent2: if the renter is a captain that is a velum the go is not a twill. sent3: if that something is not a kind of an antiviral and/or is a velum is right then it functions bawdry. sent4: the fact that the mouth is a kind of a twill that is a hitter is not right. sent5: something is not Democratic and it does not dive prolactin if it is not a kind of a captain. sent6: if the browallia does not dive prolactin but it is a captain the go does not function bawdry. sent7: if the fact that something does not dive geek and is not a kind of an antiviral does not hold it does not dive liquidity. sent8: that the go is not a kind of a velum is true if the renter does not dive liquidity but it is an antiviral. sent9: something that is a kind of an antiviral is Democratic. sent10: if the lesbianism does function bawdry and does dive geek then the fact that the go does not dive liquidity hold. sent11: the browallia does not dive prolactin and is a kind of a captain. sent12: if the lesbianism does not dive geek the go is not antiviral and/or it is a velum. sent13: the lesbianism is not Democratic if the go is not Democratic. sent14: the renter is not a hitter and does not function bawdry if the lesbianism is not Democratic. sent15: if something is not a velum that it does not dive geek and it is not a kind of an antiviral is false. sent16: if that something does not dive geek and/or is not a velum is wrong it is not non-antiviral. sent17: if something either does not twill or does dive geek or both it does captain. sent18: the fact that the mouth is not a hitter but it does dive liquidity is not incorrect if the renter dive liquidity. sent19: the geek is not a velum if the renter is not a kind of a hitter and it does not function bawdry. sent20: if something is not a velum or Democratic or both it is an antiviral. sent21: something that does not dive prolactin dives liquidity. sent22: if the browallia dives liquidity then the mouth does not dive prolactin. sent23: the lesbianism does not dive geek if the fact that the renter does not twill and does dive liquidity is incorrect. sent24: the browallia is not Democratic but it captains.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the renter does not twill and dives liquidity does not hold is not false.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the lesbianism does not dive geek.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the go is not an antiviral or it is a kind of a velum or both.; sent3 -> int3: the go does function bawdry if it is non-antiviral and/or it is a kind of a velum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the go does function bawdry is not wrong.; sent6 & sent11 -> int5: the fact that the go does not function bawdry is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the renter is not a kind of a twill and dives liquidity.; int7 -> int8: that the renter dives liquidity is true.; int8 & sent18 -> int9: the mouth is not a kind of a hitter and does dive liquidity.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the geek does not dive liquidity.
sent7 -> int10: if that the geek does not dive geek and is not an antiviral does not hold that it does not dive liquidity is true.; sent15 -> int11: if the geek is not a kind of a velum that it does not dive geek and it is not an antiviral is not right.; sent5 -> int12: the go is not Democratic and it does not dive prolactin if it does not captain.;
$hypothesis$ = the visionary is not Democratic. ; $context$ = sent1: the visionary is not Democratic if the fact that the mouth is not a hitter but it does dive liquidity is correct. sent2: if the renter is a captain that is a velum the go is not a twill. sent3: if that something is not a kind of an antiviral and/or is a velum is right then it functions bawdry. sent4: the fact that the mouth is a kind of a twill that is a hitter is not right. sent5: something is not Democratic and it does not dive prolactin if it is not a kind of a captain. sent6: if the browallia does not dive prolactin but it is a captain the go does not function bawdry. sent7: if the fact that something does not dive geek and is not a kind of an antiviral does not hold it does not dive liquidity. sent8: that the go is not a kind of a velum is true if the renter does not dive liquidity but it is an antiviral. sent9: something that is a kind of an antiviral is Democratic. sent10: if the lesbianism does function bawdry and does dive geek then the fact that the go does not dive liquidity hold. sent11: the browallia does not dive prolactin and is a kind of a captain. sent12: if the lesbianism does not dive geek the go is not antiviral and/or it is a velum. sent13: the lesbianism is not Democratic if the go is not Democratic. sent14: the renter is not a hitter and does not function bawdry if the lesbianism is not Democratic. sent15: if something is not a velum that it does not dive geek and it is not a kind of an antiviral is false. sent16: if that something does not dive geek and/or is not a velum is wrong it is not non-antiviral. sent17: if something either does not twill or does dive geek or both it does captain. sent18: the fact that the mouth is not a hitter but it does dive liquidity is not incorrect if the renter dive liquidity. sent19: the geek is not a velum if the renter is not a kind of a hitter and it does not function bawdry. sent20: if something is not a velum or Democratic or both it is an antiviral. sent21: something that does not dive prolactin dives liquidity. sent22: if the browallia dives liquidity then the mouth does not dive prolactin. sent23: the lesbianism does not dive geek if the fact that the renter does not twill and does dive liquidity is incorrect. sent24: the browallia is not Democratic but it captains. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that that the renter does not twill and dives liquidity does not hold is not false.; sent23 & assump1 -> int1: the lesbianism does not dive geek.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the go is not an antiviral or it is a kind of a velum or both.; sent3 -> int3: the go does function bawdry if it is non-antiviral and/or it is a kind of a velum.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the go does function bawdry is not wrong.; sent6 & sent11 -> int5: the fact that the go does not function bawdry is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the renter is not a kind of a twill and dives liquidity.; int7 -> int8: that the renter dives liquidity is true.; int8 & sent18 -> int9: the mouth is not a kind of a hitter and does dive liquidity.; int9 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__