the fact that the chromosome is both not netting and not non-postural is wrong.
sent1: the chromosome is not a netting but it is retinal if the articulation is postural. sent2: the articulation is a toy if it does brisk. sent3: the articulation is not postural if the chromosome brisks. sent4: something is a netting and does toy if it is not metacarpal. sent5: there exists nothing that is a kind of non-retinal thing that does not brisk. sent6: there exists nothing such that it is not retinal and brisks. sent7: that the articulation is not retinal but it does brisk does not hold. sent8: the presbyope does not fudge ungodliness if the doe does not grapple. sent9: if that something is not retinal and does not brisk is incorrect then it toys. sent10: if the articulation is a toy then the chromosome is not netting. sent11: the prompter is not metacarpal if that it fudges ungodliness and governs Paxton is incorrect. sent12: that something is metacarpal and/or governs Paxton is not correct if it does not fudge ungodliness. sent13: if the articulation toys the chromosome is not netting but it is postural. sent14: there exists nothing that is both not retinal and not a netting. sent15: if that something is not a relinquishment and not neural is incorrect it does inundate ammobium. sent16: if the fact that the presbyope does not govern Paxton and/or is a metacarpal is not true the prompter toys. sent17: if something does brisk it toys. sent18: the prompter is not a toy if that the presbyope is a metacarpal and/or does govern Paxton is incorrect. sent19: something does not grapple if the fact that it grapple and it is not a Chilean is false. sent20: the chromosome does not net but it is a toy. sent21: the chromosome is not a netting.
sent5 -> int1: that the articulation is not retinal and it does not brisk does not hold.; sent9 -> int2: the articulation is a toy if that it is non-retinal thing that does not brisk is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the articulation is a toy.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the chromosome is a kind of non-netting thing that is postural is not true.
sent4 -> int4: if the prompter is not a metacarpal it is a kind of netting thing that is a kind of a toy.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the chromosome is both not netting and not non-postural is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the chromosome is not a netting but it is retinal if the articulation is postural. sent2: the articulation is a toy if it does brisk. sent3: the articulation is not postural if the chromosome brisks. sent4: something is a netting and does toy if it is not metacarpal. sent5: there exists nothing that is a kind of non-retinal thing that does not brisk. sent6: there exists nothing such that it is not retinal and brisks. sent7: that the articulation is not retinal but it does brisk does not hold. sent8: the presbyope does not fudge ungodliness if the doe does not grapple. sent9: if that something is not retinal and does not brisk is incorrect then it toys. sent10: if the articulation is a toy then the chromosome is not netting. sent11: the prompter is not metacarpal if that it fudges ungodliness and governs Paxton is incorrect. sent12: that something is metacarpal and/or governs Paxton is not correct if it does not fudge ungodliness. sent13: if the articulation toys the chromosome is not netting but it is postural. sent14: there exists nothing that is both not retinal and not a netting. sent15: if that something is not a relinquishment and not neural is incorrect it does inundate ammobium. sent16: if the fact that the presbyope does not govern Paxton and/or is a metacarpal is not true the prompter toys. sent17: if something does brisk it toys. sent18: the prompter is not a toy if that the presbyope is a metacarpal and/or does govern Paxton is incorrect. sent19: something does not grapple if the fact that it grapple and it is not a Chilean is false. sent20: the chromosome does not net but it is a toy. sent21: the chromosome is not a netting. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: that the articulation is not retinal and it does not brisk does not hold.; sent9 -> int2: the articulation is a toy if that it is non-retinal thing that does not brisk is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the articulation is a toy.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__