the speakeasy is thirsty.
sent1: there is something such that that it is Beethovenian and a escadrille does not hold. sent2: if there is something such that that it is thirsty and it is not a escadrille is not right the speakeasy is Beethovenian. sent3: if the sketch is a kind of a escadrille then the ridge is a escadrille. sent4: something is a kind of a escadrille and it is a kind of an eelgrass if it does not barbarize sketch. sent5: there is something such that that it is a escadrille and it is thirsty does not hold. sent6: something groups Decalogue and is not Incan. sent7: if something is carbocyclic the fact that the ridge is Beethovenian and it is a kind of a escadrille is false. sent8: the fact that the fact that the ridge is thirsty and is a kind of a escadrille does not hold is not wrong. sent9: the speakeasy is thirsty if there exists something such that the fact that it is Beethovenian and it is not a escadrille is not correct. sent10: if there is something such that it is a kind of a escadrille that the speakeasy is Beethovenian and it is thirsty does not hold. sent11: that the ridge is Beethovenian and is a kind of a escadrille is wrong. sent12: that the sketch does not barbarize sketch hold if that the sitter is not phagocytic but a courthouse is not correct. sent13: something is Beethovenian but it is not a escadrille. sent14: the sitter does not group Theophrastus if the fact that it is not a pyrrhuloxia or is scientific or both is not correct. sent15: if that the sitter does not group Theophrastus is true then the fact that it is a kind of non-phagocytic thing that is a courthouse is not correct. sent16: the fact that the speakeasy is a kind of a bog and does not quadruple is not correct. sent17: that the ridge is not Beethovenian or it is carbocyclic or both does not hold if it is a escadrille. sent18: if there exists something such that it is carbocyclic the fact that the ridge is Beethovenian but it is not a kind of a escadrille is not right. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a escadrille the speakeasy is thirsty.
the speakeasy is non-thirsty.
sent4 -> int1: the fact that if the sketch does not barbarize sketch the sketch is a escadrille that is a kind of an eelgrass is true.;
$hypothesis$ = the speakeasy is thirsty. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it is Beethovenian and a escadrille does not hold. sent2: if there is something such that that it is thirsty and it is not a escadrille is not right the speakeasy is Beethovenian. sent3: if the sketch is a kind of a escadrille then the ridge is a escadrille. sent4: something is a kind of a escadrille and it is a kind of an eelgrass if it does not barbarize sketch. sent5: there is something such that that it is a escadrille and it is thirsty does not hold. sent6: something groups Decalogue and is not Incan. sent7: if something is carbocyclic the fact that the ridge is Beethovenian and it is a kind of a escadrille is false. sent8: the fact that the fact that the ridge is thirsty and is a kind of a escadrille does not hold is not wrong. sent9: the speakeasy is thirsty if there exists something such that the fact that it is Beethovenian and it is not a escadrille is not correct. sent10: if there is something such that it is a kind of a escadrille that the speakeasy is Beethovenian and it is thirsty does not hold. sent11: that the ridge is Beethovenian and is a kind of a escadrille is wrong. sent12: that the sketch does not barbarize sketch hold if that the sitter is not phagocytic but a courthouse is not correct. sent13: something is Beethovenian but it is not a escadrille. sent14: the sitter does not group Theophrastus if the fact that it is not a pyrrhuloxia or is scientific or both is not correct. sent15: if that the sitter does not group Theophrastus is true then the fact that it is a kind of non-phagocytic thing that is a courthouse is not correct. sent16: the fact that the speakeasy is a kind of a bog and does not quadruple is not correct. sent17: that the ridge is not Beethovenian or it is carbocyclic or both does not hold if it is a escadrille. sent18: if there exists something such that it is carbocyclic the fact that the ridge is Beethovenian but it is not a kind of a escadrille is not right. sent19: if there exists something such that it is a escadrille the speakeasy is thirsty. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__