there exists something such that if it does not shaft chemosynthesis it is not manageable and is not acarpelous.
sent1: something is a kind of non-multicultural thing that does not bog spatiality if it shafts chemosynthesis. sent2: the fact that the Chicano is not manageable but acarpelous is not true. sent3: the fact that the Chicano is not manageable and it is not a Atlantic is wrong. sent4: the Chicano is not manageable and it is not acarpelous if it shafts chemosynthesis. sent5: the shag shafts August if that the Chicano shafts August and does not shaft serology is wrong. sent6: if the Senhor is not a barosaur and does not tittup it is acarpelous. sent7: if the runaway is prejudicial that the protection does not evict penalty and does not shaft serology is not right. sent8: if the fact that the Abyssinian is a kind of unassertive thing that does not partake is not true then it does shaft chemosynthesis. sent9: if that the protection does not evict penalty and does not shaft serology is false the Chicano does not shaft August. sent10: something is prejudicial if the fact that it is a kind of a polygynist is correct. sent11: if a non-trustworthy thing does shaft August it is not specialistic. sent12: the Chicano is a coffin if the fact that it is not trustworthy and it does not evict entente is not right. sent13: the Chicano is specialistic if the fact that it is acarpelous is true. sent14: if something is not trustworthy and it is not specialistic then it shafts chemosynthesis. sent15: the runaway is a polygynist that is not non-tricentenary. sent16: something that is specialistic shafts chemosynthesis.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the Chicano is not manageable and is non-acarpelous is wrong.; sent16 -> int1: the Chicano does shaft chemosynthesis if the fact that it is specialistic is not wrong.;
the shag is not unmanageable.
sent11 -> int2: that the shag is not specialistic is right if it is untrustworthy thing that does shaft August.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not shaft chemosynthesis it is not manageable and is not acarpelous. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a kind of non-multicultural thing that does not bog spatiality if it shafts chemosynthesis. sent2: the fact that the Chicano is not manageable but acarpelous is not true. sent3: the fact that the Chicano is not manageable and it is not a Atlantic is wrong. sent4: the Chicano is not manageable and it is not acarpelous if it shafts chemosynthesis. sent5: the shag shafts August if that the Chicano shafts August and does not shaft serology is wrong. sent6: if the Senhor is not a barosaur and does not tittup it is acarpelous. sent7: if the runaway is prejudicial that the protection does not evict penalty and does not shaft serology is not right. sent8: if the fact that the Abyssinian is a kind of unassertive thing that does not partake is not true then it does shaft chemosynthesis. sent9: if that the protection does not evict penalty and does not shaft serology is false the Chicano does not shaft August. sent10: something is prejudicial if the fact that it is a kind of a polygynist is correct. sent11: if a non-trustworthy thing does shaft August it is not specialistic. sent12: the Chicano is a coffin if the fact that it is not trustworthy and it does not evict entente is not right. sent13: the Chicano is specialistic if the fact that it is acarpelous is true. sent14: if something is not trustworthy and it is not specialistic then it shafts chemosynthesis. sent15: the runaway is a polygynist that is not non-tricentenary. sent16: something that is specialistic shafts chemosynthesis. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the Chicano is not manageable and is non-acarpelous is wrong.; sent16 -> int1: the Chicano does shaft chemosynthesis if the fact that it is specialistic is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__