the fact that the seeping ern or the sagging metal or both happens is not true.
sent1: if the citricness does not occur the sagging rambler and the proposal occurs. sent2: the proteinaceousness does not occur. sent3: the proteinaceousness happens if the house occurs. sent4: the trustfulness occurs. sent5: the citricness occurs. sent6: if the proteinaceousness does not occur the ethicalness happens and the metastaticness happens. sent7: the ethicalness is prevented by that the dictating embolectomy occurs or that the sagging acclimatization happens or both. sent8: the fact that not the citricness but the sagging acclimatization occurs is wrong if that the dictating embolectomy occurs is not wrong. sent9: the agreeableness happens if that both the seeping ern and the non-agreeableness occurs is not right. sent10: the metastaticness occurs. sent11: if the proposal does not occur then that either the seeping ern occurs or the sagging metal happens or both does not hold. sent12: the sagging metal happens if the non-metastaticness and/or the sagging metal happens. sent13: the neolithicness does not occur if the fact that the follow-up but not the tie happens is incorrect. sent14: if the metastaticness does not occur then both the dictating embolectomy and the ethicalness occurs. sent15: the metastaticness happens if the proteinaceousness does not occur. sent16: if the sagging metal happens then not the dictating embolectomy but the ethicalness happens. sent17: the proposal happens and the citricness occurs. sent18: either the scrimping happens or the smoking occurs or both. sent19: if the dictating embolectomy happens then the ethicalness does not occur. sent20: the sagging acclimatization happens if the seeping ern does not occur and the proposal occurs. sent21: if the dictating embolectomy does not occur that the fact that the seeping ern occurs but the agreeableness does not occur is right is not true. sent22: that that the sagging glued happens or the humaneness happens or both hold prevents that the charging happens. sent23: if the neolithicness does not occur the defervescentness does not occur and the housing does not occur.
sent17 -> int1: the proposal occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seeping ern does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the seeping ern but the proposal happens.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the sagging acclimatization happens.; int3 -> int4: the dictating embolectomy happens and/or the sagging acclimatization happens.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the ethicalness does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int6: both the ethicalness and the metastaticness happens.; int6 -> int7: the ethicalness happens.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the seeping ern happens.; int9 -> hypothesis;
both the sagging rambler and the agreeableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the seeping ern or the sagging metal or both happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the citricness does not occur the sagging rambler and the proposal occurs. sent2: the proteinaceousness does not occur. sent3: the proteinaceousness happens if the house occurs. sent4: the trustfulness occurs. sent5: the citricness occurs. sent6: if the proteinaceousness does not occur the ethicalness happens and the metastaticness happens. sent7: the ethicalness is prevented by that the dictating embolectomy occurs or that the sagging acclimatization happens or both. sent8: the fact that not the citricness but the sagging acclimatization occurs is wrong if that the dictating embolectomy occurs is not wrong. sent9: the agreeableness happens if that both the seeping ern and the non-agreeableness occurs is not right. sent10: the metastaticness occurs. sent11: if the proposal does not occur then that either the seeping ern occurs or the sagging metal happens or both does not hold. sent12: the sagging metal happens if the non-metastaticness and/or the sagging metal happens. sent13: the neolithicness does not occur if the fact that the follow-up but not the tie happens is incorrect. sent14: if the metastaticness does not occur then both the dictating embolectomy and the ethicalness occurs. sent15: the metastaticness happens if the proteinaceousness does not occur. sent16: if the sagging metal happens then not the dictating embolectomy but the ethicalness happens. sent17: the proposal happens and the citricness occurs. sent18: either the scrimping happens or the smoking occurs or both. sent19: if the dictating embolectomy happens then the ethicalness does not occur. sent20: the sagging acclimatization happens if the seeping ern does not occur and the proposal occurs. sent21: if the dictating embolectomy does not occur that the fact that the seeping ern occurs but the agreeableness does not occur is right is not true. sent22: that that the sagging glued happens or the humaneness happens or both hold prevents that the charging happens. sent23: if the neolithicness does not occur the defervescentness does not occur and the housing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the proposal occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the seeping ern does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: not the seeping ern but the proposal happens.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the sagging acclimatization happens.; int3 -> int4: the dictating embolectomy happens and/or the sagging acclimatization happens.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the ethicalness does not occur.; sent6 & sent2 -> int6: both the ethicalness and the metastaticness happens.; int6 -> int7: the ethicalness happens.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the seeping ern happens.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__