that the forgery does not personify thermopile and does not personify insectifuge is not true.
sent1: that the impurity is not an assay but heedless is not correct if the insectifuge assembles. sent2: the forgery does not personify thermopile. sent3: if the fact that the impurity is not a kind of an assay and is heedless does not hold then the forgery is an assay. sent4: the forgery is not an assay. sent5: the fact that something does not personify thermopile and it does not personify insectifuge is false if it does assay. sent6: the forgery does not personify thermopile and does not personify insectifuge if it does not assay.
sent6 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the forgery does not personify thermopile and does not personify insectifuge is not right.
sent5 -> int1: the fact that that the forgery does not personify thermopile and it does not personify insectifuge is right is incorrect if it does assay.;
$hypothesis$ = that the forgery does not personify thermopile and does not personify insectifuge is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the impurity is not an assay but heedless is not correct if the insectifuge assembles. sent2: the forgery does not personify thermopile. sent3: if the fact that the impurity is not a kind of an assay and is heedless does not hold then the forgery is an assay. sent4: the forgery is not an assay. sent5: the fact that something does not personify thermopile and it does not personify insectifuge is false if it does assay. sent6: the forgery does not personify thermopile and does not personify insectifuge if it does not assay. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__