if the tubalness does not occur then that the fact that both the non-reverberantness and the blight happens is not incorrect is incorrect.
sent1: that the ambush occurs but the blighting does not occur prevents that the reverberantness happens. sent2: if either the convergentness happens or the contributing Hippoglossus does not occur or both then the blighting does not occur. sent3: the sensitizing Lamarck does not occur. sent4: the ambushing happens. sent5: if the fact that the aphoristicness does not occur is not false that the non-reverberantness and the blighting happens is not right. sent6: that the japaning rockcress but not the sensitizing resettlement happens is not true if the aphoristicness happens. sent7: the fact that both the reverberantness and the blighting occurs is wrong if the tubalness does not occur. sent8: that the reverberantness and the blight occurs does not hold. sent9: that the headship occurs is prevented by that both the tubalness and the aphoristicness happens. sent10: that the skedaddle does not occur and the japaning Scaridae happens is not right. sent11: the fact that the tubalness happens is true if the japaning rockcress does not occur. sent12: if the aphoristicness does not occur the fact that the reverberantness and the blight occurs does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the aphoristicness occurs is correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that that the japaning rockcress but not the sensitizing resettlement happens is not true is correct.;
the headship does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the tubalness does not occur then that the fact that both the non-reverberantness and the blight happens is not incorrect is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the ambush occurs but the blighting does not occur prevents that the reverberantness happens. sent2: if either the convergentness happens or the contributing Hippoglossus does not occur or both then the blighting does not occur. sent3: the sensitizing Lamarck does not occur. sent4: the ambushing happens. sent5: if the fact that the aphoristicness does not occur is not false that the non-reverberantness and the blighting happens is not right. sent6: that the japaning rockcress but not the sensitizing resettlement happens is not true if the aphoristicness happens. sent7: the fact that both the reverberantness and the blighting occurs is wrong if the tubalness does not occur. sent8: that the reverberantness and the blight occurs does not hold. sent9: that the headship occurs is prevented by that both the tubalness and the aphoristicness happens. sent10: that the skedaddle does not occur and the japaning Scaridae happens is not right. sent11: the fact that the tubalness happens is true if the japaning rockcress does not occur. sent12: if the aphoristicness does not occur the fact that the reverberantness and the blight occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the aphoristicness occurs is correct.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that that the japaning rockcress but not the sensitizing resettlement happens is not true is correct.; __UNKNOWN__