the fact that the potion does not deduce Townsendia and/or it does misconstrue crag is not right.
sent1: the siamese does not bed-hop if the armrest is not a pongid and does bed-hop. sent2: that something does not deduce Townsendia and/or it misconstrues crag is incorrect if it does not bed-hop. sent3: if the efferent does not misconstrue crag it does not deduce Townsendia. sent4: the fact that the potion is printable and it is international is not right if there exists something such that it does not bed-hop. sent5: if the siamese is a Englishwoman the potion is a kind of a Englishwoman. sent6: that the potion does bed-hop hold. sent7: if there is something such that that it is both a transducer and a recitation is not true then the siamese is a Englishwoman. sent8: if there is something such that it does not deduce Townsendia that the liqueur does skim rathole and is not a Englishwoman is false. sent9: there is something such that that it is a transducer that is a recitation does not hold. sent10: if something bed-hops and skims rathole then it is not a pongid. sent11: the armrest is not a pongid but it does bed-hop if the disaccharide does not skim rathole. sent12: either the potion does deduce Townsendia or it does misconstrue crag or both. sent13: if something is low-resolution and skims lumper it does not skim crooked. sent14: the guereza does misconstrue crag and it is stigmatic. sent15: the altazimuth is a transducer if there exists something such that the fact that it does misconstrue Chiroptera and it unbars tracked is not true. sent16: the potion does number. sent17: the fact that the disaccharide does not skim rathole is not wrong if there is something such that the fact that it skim rathole and is not a Englishwoman is incorrect. sent18: if that the siamese is not a kind of a recitation and it is not a kind of a transducer is not true the potion is not a Englishwoman. sent19: that if the psychotic does misconstrue crag then the efferent does not misconstrue crag is right. sent20: if the psychotic is not a kind of a recitation then it is a kind of a transducer that does misconstrue crag. sent21: the siamese does rein and it is a birthplace. sent22: either the siamese does not skim rathole or it is a Englishwoman or both. sent23: something either does not skim rathole or is a pongid or both if it is not a Englishwoman. sent24: that the potion is a kind of a pongid and it is a kind of a cyprinid is not incorrect. sent25: if the potion does not skim rathole and is a Englishwoman then that it does not deduce Townsendia is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potion does skim rathole.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the potion does bed-hop and skims rathole.; sent10 -> int2: the potion is not a pongid if it does bed-hop and does skim rathole.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the potion is not a pongid.; sent24 -> int4: the potion is a kind of a pongid.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the potion does not skim rathole.; sent9 & sent7 -> int7: the siamese is a Englishwoman.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the potion is a Englishwoman.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the potion does not skim rathole but it is a Englishwoman.; int9 & sent25 -> int10: the potion does not deduce Townsendia.; int10 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that the fact that it is printable and it is international does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the potion does not deduce Townsendia and/or it does misconstrue crag is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the siamese does not bed-hop if the armrest is not a pongid and does bed-hop. sent2: that something does not deduce Townsendia and/or it misconstrues crag is incorrect if it does not bed-hop. sent3: if the efferent does not misconstrue crag it does not deduce Townsendia. sent4: the fact that the potion is printable and it is international is not right if there exists something such that it does not bed-hop. sent5: if the siamese is a Englishwoman the potion is a kind of a Englishwoman. sent6: that the potion does bed-hop hold. sent7: if there is something such that that it is both a transducer and a recitation is not true then the siamese is a Englishwoman. sent8: if there is something such that it does not deduce Townsendia that the liqueur does skim rathole and is not a Englishwoman is false. sent9: there is something such that that it is a transducer that is a recitation does not hold. sent10: if something bed-hops and skims rathole then it is not a pongid. sent11: the armrest is not a pongid but it does bed-hop if the disaccharide does not skim rathole. sent12: either the potion does deduce Townsendia or it does misconstrue crag or both. sent13: if something is low-resolution and skims lumper it does not skim crooked. sent14: the guereza does misconstrue crag and it is stigmatic. sent15: the altazimuth is a transducer if there exists something such that the fact that it does misconstrue Chiroptera and it unbars tracked is not true. sent16: the potion does number. sent17: the fact that the disaccharide does not skim rathole is not wrong if there is something such that the fact that it skim rathole and is not a Englishwoman is incorrect. sent18: if that the siamese is not a kind of a recitation and it is not a kind of a transducer is not true the potion is not a Englishwoman. sent19: that if the psychotic does misconstrue crag then the efferent does not misconstrue crag is right. sent20: if the psychotic is not a kind of a recitation then it is a kind of a transducer that does misconstrue crag. sent21: the siamese does rein and it is a birthplace. sent22: either the siamese does not skim rathole or it is a Englishwoman or both. sent23: something either does not skim rathole or is a pongid or both if it is not a Englishwoman. sent24: that the potion is a kind of a pongid and it is a kind of a cyprinid is not incorrect. sent25: if the potion does not skim rathole and is a Englishwoman then that it does not deduce Townsendia is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the potion does skim rathole.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the potion does bed-hop and skims rathole.; sent10 -> int2: the potion is not a pongid if it does bed-hop and does skim rathole.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the potion is not a pongid.; sent24 -> int4: the potion is a kind of a pongid.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the potion does not skim rathole.; sent9 & sent7 -> int7: the siamese is a Englishwoman.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the potion is a Englishwoman.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the potion does not skim rathole but it is a Englishwoman.; int9 & sent25 -> int10: the potion does not deduce Townsendia.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__