the hoot does not occur.
sent1: if not the enolicness but the doctrinalness happens then the wipeout occurs. sent2: the covalentness occurs if the wipeout happens. sent3: the fact that both the spoliation and the myelography occurs is correct. sent4: that the flicker does not occur but the spoliation occurs is brought about by the myelography. sent5: the projection occurs and the doctrinalness occurs if the impact does not occur. sent6: that both the spoliation and the thrilling occurs prevents that the enolicness occurs. sent7: the wasting pragmatic does not occur. sent8: the hoot does not occur if the thrill does not occur. sent9: the impacting does not occur.
sent3 -> int1: the spoliation happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thrill occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the spoliation and the thrill happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the enolicness does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int4: the projection and the doctrinalness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the doctrinalness happens is not wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the enolicness does not occur and the doctrinalness happens.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the wipeout occurs.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the covalentness happens.;
the flicker does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the hoot does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if not the enolicness but the doctrinalness happens then the wipeout occurs. sent2: the covalentness occurs if the wipeout happens. sent3: the fact that both the spoliation and the myelography occurs is correct. sent4: that the flicker does not occur but the spoliation occurs is brought about by the myelography. sent5: the projection occurs and the doctrinalness occurs if the impact does not occur. sent6: that both the spoliation and the thrilling occurs prevents that the enolicness occurs. sent7: the wasting pragmatic does not occur. sent8: the hoot does not occur if the thrill does not occur. sent9: the impacting does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the spoliation happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thrill occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the spoliation and the thrill happens.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the enolicness does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int4: the projection and the doctrinalness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the doctrinalness happens is not wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the enolicness does not occur and the doctrinalness happens.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the wipeout occurs.; int7 & sent2 -> int8: the covalentness happens.; __UNKNOWN__