the fact that the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant and/or is indirect does not hold.
sent1: if that the yolk tinkers and is not a kind of a Scopolia is incorrect the conidiophore is not a washup. sent2: there is something such that it is not unhappy. sent3: something is not direct if the fact that it is not a speciation but unhappy is false. sent4: that the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant or it does not camouflage classroom or both is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the yolk is a kind of direct thing that does not camouflage arcsecant is not true. sent6: the fact that if the yolk is not direct that the fact that the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant or it does not direct or both is wrong is right is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that the yolk either is not a washup or does not camouflage arcsecant or both is incorrect if the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant. sent8: the caracal camouflages arcsecant. sent9: that the meclizine camouflages arcsecant but it does not maintain commanding is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it does not camouflage arcsecant. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not unhappy that the yolk is not a speciation and it is not a kind of a washup is incorrect. sent12: that the conidiophore is non-zoological thing that does not fibrillate does not hold.
sent2 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the yolk is not a kind of a speciation and is not a washup is not true.;
either the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant or it is not direct or both.
sent3 -> int2: if that the conidiophore is not a speciation but unhappy does not hold it does not direct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant and/or is indirect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the yolk tinkers and is not a kind of a Scopolia is incorrect the conidiophore is not a washup. sent2: there is something such that it is not unhappy. sent3: something is not direct if the fact that it is not a speciation but unhappy is false. sent4: that the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant or it does not camouflage classroom or both is incorrect. sent5: the fact that the yolk is a kind of direct thing that does not camouflage arcsecant is not true. sent6: the fact that if the yolk is not direct that the fact that the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant or it does not direct or both is wrong is right is not incorrect. sent7: the fact that the yolk either is not a washup or does not camouflage arcsecant or both is incorrect if the conidiophore does not camouflage arcsecant. sent8: the caracal camouflages arcsecant. sent9: that the meclizine camouflages arcsecant but it does not maintain commanding is wrong. sent10: there exists something such that it does not camouflage arcsecant. sent11: if there exists something such that it is not unhappy that the yolk is not a speciation and it is not a kind of a washup is incorrect. sent12: that the conidiophore is non-zoological thing that does not fibrillate does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent11 -> int1: the fact that the yolk is not a kind of a speciation and is not a washup is not true.; __UNKNOWN__