that there exists something such that if it is a burette that does crystallize agitprop then it is not telegraphic does not hold.
sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it is an arm and a chauffeur it is not macrencephalic is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is particularistic thing that shatters priest then it does not weld VI. sent3: there exists something such that if it welds destroyer and is a kind of a Reid it is macrencephalic. sent4: there is something such that if it is a chauffeur that is a kind of a calanthe then it is not a coin. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a burette and crystallizes agitprop is not incorrect it is telegraphic. sent6: there is something such that if it welds Aeneid and does shatter salted then it is not a kind of a range. sent7: if the fact that the galbulus is a kind of a burette and it crystallizes agitprop hold then it is telegraphic. sent8: if the galbulus is a burette and it crystallizes agitprop it is not telegraphic. sent9: if the gob is a kind of telegraphic thing that does shatter priest it is not hymenal. sent10: if an agua is an arm it is not telegraphic. sent11: if something that does shatter reward does weld Aeneid it is not a oilcan. sent12: something that is a kind of cleistogamous thing that welds VI is not a mixer.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is cleistogamous and it does weld VI then it is not a kind of a mixer.
sent12 -> int1: if the balldress is cleistogamous thing that welds VI then it is not a kind of a mixer.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is a burette that does crystallize agitprop then it is not telegraphic does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there exists something such that if it is an arm and a chauffeur it is not macrencephalic is not incorrect. sent2: there exists something such that if it is particularistic thing that shatters priest then it does not weld VI. sent3: there exists something such that if it welds destroyer and is a kind of a Reid it is macrencephalic. sent4: there is something such that if it is a chauffeur that is a kind of a calanthe then it is not a coin. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of a burette and crystallizes agitprop is not incorrect it is telegraphic. sent6: there is something such that if it welds Aeneid and does shatter salted then it is not a kind of a range. sent7: if the fact that the galbulus is a kind of a burette and it crystallizes agitprop hold then it is telegraphic. sent8: if the galbulus is a burette and it crystallizes agitprop it is not telegraphic. sent9: if the gob is a kind of telegraphic thing that does shatter priest it is not hymenal. sent10: if an agua is an arm it is not telegraphic. sent11: if something that does shatter reward does weld Aeneid it is not a oilcan. sent12: something that is a kind of cleistogamous thing that welds VI is not a mixer. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__