if the gearing Mimidae occurs then the fact that the pluralness does not occur is true.
sent1: the fearfulness happens. sent2: that the invaliding happens leads to that the mellowing does not occur. sent3: the indemnification happens and the recreating happens if the Ephesians does not occur. sent4: the train happens if the unmownness and the accountantship happens. sent5: that the gearing Mimidae and the plural occurs is caused by that the inducement does not occur. sent6: the gape and the anatropousness occurs if the scissoring does not occur. sent7: the anatropousness and the scissoring occurs. sent8: if the benefiting happens then the inducement does not occur and the metalworking does not occur. sent9: that the mercantileness occurs and the cambering corncrake happens triggers that the artfulness happens. sent10: if that the indemnification happens is correct then the benefit occurs. sent11: the pluralness does not occur if both the scissoring and the gearing Mimidae happens. sent12: the inaccurateness occurs and the metalworking occurs.
sent7 -> int1: the scissoring happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gearing Mimidae happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scissoring occurs and the gearing Mimidae happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the pluralness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the gape occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the gearing Mimidae occurs then the fact that the pluralness does not occur is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fearfulness happens. sent2: that the invaliding happens leads to that the mellowing does not occur. sent3: the indemnification happens and the recreating happens if the Ephesians does not occur. sent4: the train happens if the unmownness and the accountantship happens. sent5: that the gearing Mimidae and the plural occurs is caused by that the inducement does not occur. sent6: the gape and the anatropousness occurs if the scissoring does not occur. sent7: the anatropousness and the scissoring occurs. sent8: if the benefiting happens then the inducement does not occur and the metalworking does not occur. sent9: that the mercantileness occurs and the cambering corncrake happens triggers that the artfulness happens. sent10: if that the indemnification happens is correct then the benefit occurs. sent11: the pluralness does not occur if both the scissoring and the gearing Mimidae happens. sent12: the inaccurateness occurs and the metalworking occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the scissoring happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gearing Mimidae happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scissoring occurs and the gearing Mimidae happens.; sent11 & int2 -> int3: the pluralness does not occur.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__