the foghorn does heat Truman and cables.
sent1: if the mica is not Semite the Shakers does not lunch legislature and is sectorial. sent2: the foghorn is avitaminotic and it is a kind of a canonist. sent3: the cheerer does cable. sent4: if something is canonist it is avitaminotic. sent5: something is not a kind of a Anzio and it is not a Sunnite if it does not lunch legislature. sent6: the foghorn is a Anzio. sent7: the fact that the mica is a Wilmut but it is not baptismal is incorrect. sent8: if something is avitaminotic it heats Truman. sent9: the foghorn is a ping. sent10: something is non-Semite if that it is both a Wilmut and not baptismal is not true. sent11: the organza is a kind of a canonist if either the radiophotograph is not a Xanthium or it is a kind of a canonist or both. sent12: the fact that something is not a kind of a Xanthium or it is canonist or both is not false if that it is a kind of a Anzio is wrong. sent13: if the Shakers does not lunch legislature and is sectorial then the radiophotograph does not lunch legislature.
sent8 -> int1: if the foghorn is avitaminotic it heats Truman.; sent2 -> int2: the foghorn is not non-avitaminotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the foghorn does heat Truman.;
that the foghorn does heat Truman and it is a cable is wrong.
sent4 -> int4: if the organza is canonist then it is avitaminotic.; sent12 -> int5: if the radiophotograph is not a Anzio then it is not a Xanthium or it is a canonist or both.; sent5 -> int6: if the radiophotograph does not lunch legislature then it is not a Anzio and it is not a Sunnite.; sent10 -> int7: the mica is not Semite if the fact that it is a Wilmut and not baptismal is not right.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the mica is not a Semite.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the Shakers does not lunch legislature and is sectorial.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the radiophotograph does not lunch legislature.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the radiophotograph is both not a Anzio and not a Sunnite.; int11 -> int12: the radiophotograph is not a Anzio.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the radiophotograph is not a Xanthium and/or it is a canonist.; sent11 & int13 -> int14: the organza is a kind of a canonist.; int4 & int14 -> int15: the organza is avitaminotic.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is avitaminotic.;
$hypothesis$ = the foghorn does heat Truman and cables. ; $context$ = sent1: if the mica is not Semite the Shakers does not lunch legislature and is sectorial. sent2: the foghorn is avitaminotic and it is a kind of a canonist. sent3: the cheerer does cable. sent4: if something is canonist it is avitaminotic. sent5: something is not a kind of a Anzio and it is not a Sunnite if it does not lunch legislature. sent6: the foghorn is a Anzio. sent7: the fact that the mica is a Wilmut but it is not baptismal is incorrect. sent8: if something is avitaminotic it heats Truman. sent9: the foghorn is a ping. sent10: something is non-Semite if that it is both a Wilmut and not baptismal is not true. sent11: the organza is a kind of a canonist if either the radiophotograph is not a Xanthium or it is a kind of a canonist or both. sent12: the fact that something is not a kind of a Xanthium or it is canonist or both is not false if that it is a kind of a Anzio is wrong. sent13: if the Shakers does not lunch legislature and is sectorial then the radiophotograph does not lunch legislature. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if the foghorn is avitaminotic it heats Truman.; sent2 -> int2: the foghorn is not non-avitaminotic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the foghorn does heat Truman.; __UNKNOWN__