the decoration does not forecast Robeson.
sent1: if the creatine is a kind of a refraction but it is not a kind of a jackstraw then the letters does not crust senior. sent2: the creatine forecasts micropyle and it is atonic if the involution does not forecast regiment. sent3: the fact that the Shaktist is both bulbar and a teardrop is not wrong if the decoration is not bulbar. sent4: the letters is an estrus. sent5: the fact that something is not a tangled and/or it is an estrus does not hold if it does not crust senior. sent6: the letters forecasts micropyle and it is a refraction. sent7: that the Shaktist is a kind of an estrus hold if it is a Gadus. sent8: something is not a Gadus and does crust injudiciousness if the fact that it is not bulbar is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the mandrill is not a tangled and it is not a jackstraw is false. sent10: the fact that the Shaktist does not forecast Robeson but it is a Gadus is not correct if there is something such that it is not adenocarcinomatous. sent11: the fact that the mistress is not a refraction and is a transmutation is not true. sent12: if that the avatar is not a teardrop and is bulbar does not hold it is not bulbar. sent13: if something is a teardrop then it is a Gadus. sent14: the letters does forecast micropyle if it is bulbar. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a jackstraw that the mandrill does not crust senior but it is a tangled does not hold. sent16: if something is a kind of a tangled it is not a kind of a refraction. sent17: that if that something is not adenocarcinomatous and it does not forecast mercilessness does not hold it does not forecast Robeson hold. sent18: there are bulbar things. sent19: if the mandrill is not a teardrop then the Shaktist is either not a Gadus or not bulbar or both. sent20: the involution does not forecast regiment if the gaddi does forecast Moquelumnan. sent21: that the decoration is not bulbar is right if it is a kind of non-adenocarcinomatous thing that does not forecast mercilessness. sent22: if the letters forecasts micropyle and is a refraction it is not a jackstraw. sent23: if the fact that something is not a teardrop and it does not forecast Robeson does not hold then that it does forecast Robeson is not false. sent24: that the decoration is adenocarcinomatous but it does not forecast mercilessness does not hold. sent25: if that the letters is not a kind of a tangled and/or it is an estrus is not correct then that the mandrill is not a teardrop is not false. sent26: everything forecasts Moquelumnan and is a demiglace.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decoration is non-adenocarcinomatous thing that does not forecast mercilessness.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the decoration is not bulbar.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Shaktist is bulbar and a teardrop.; int2 -> int3: the Shaktist is a teardrop.; sent13 -> int4: the Shaktist is a kind of a Gadus if it is a teardrop.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the Shaktist is a Gadus is true.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the Shaktist is an estrus.; sent22 & sent6 -> int7: the letters is not a jackstraw.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not a jackstraw.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: that the mandrill does not crust senior and is a kind of a tangled is incorrect.; sent17 -> int10: the decoration does not forecast Robeson if that it is not adenocarcinomatous and it does not forecast mercilessness is wrong.;
the decoration forecasts Robeson.
sent23 -> int11: if the fact that the Shaktist is not a kind of a teardrop and it does not forecast Robeson is not correct it forecast Robeson.;
$hypothesis$ = the decoration does not forecast Robeson. ; $context$ = sent1: if the creatine is a kind of a refraction but it is not a kind of a jackstraw then the letters does not crust senior. sent2: the creatine forecasts micropyle and it is atonic if the involution does not forecast regiment. sent3: the fact that the Shaktist is both bulbar and a teardrop is not wrong if the decoration is not bulbar. sent4: the letters is an estrus. sent5: the fact that something is not a tangled and/or it is an estrus does not hold if it does not crust senior. sent6: the letters forecasts micropyle and it is a refraction. sent7: that the Shaktist is a kind of an estrus hold if it is a Gadus. sent8: something is not a Gadus and does crust injudiciousness if the fact that it is not bulbar is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the mandrill is not a tangled and it is not a jackstraw is false. sent10: the fact that the Shaktist does not forecast Robeson but it is a Gadus is not correct if there is something such that it is not adenocarcinomatous. sent11: the fact that the mistress is not a refraction and is a transmutation is not true. sent12: if that the avatar is not a teardrop and is bulbar does not hold it is not bulbar. sent13: if something is a teardrop then it is a Gadus. sent14: the letters does forecast micropyle if it is bulbar. sent15: if there exists something such that it is not a jackstraw that the mandrill does not crust senior but it is a tangled does not hold. sent16: if something is a kind of a tangled it is not a kind of a refraction. sent17: that if that something is not adenocarcinomatous and it does not forecast mercilessness does not hold it does not forecast Robeson hold. sent18: there are bulbar things. sent19: if the mandrill is not a teardrop then the Shaktist is either not a Gadus or not bulbar or both. sent20: the involution does not forecast regiment if the gaddi does forecast Moquelumnan. sent21: that the decoration is not bulbar is right if it is a kind of non-adenocarcinomatous thing that does not forecast mercilessness. sent22: if the letters forecasts micropyle and is a refraction it is not a jackstraw. sent23: if the fact that something is not a teardrop and it does not forecast Robeson does not hold then that it does forecast Robeson is not false. sent24: that the decoration is adenocarcinomatous but it does not forecast mercilessness does not hold. sent25: if that the letters is not a kind of a tangled and/or it is an estrus is not correct then that the mandrill is not a teardrop is not false. sent26: everything forecasts Moquelumnan and is a demiglace. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the decoration is non-adenocarcinomatous thing that does not forecast mercilessness.; sent21 & assump1 -> int1: the decoration is not bulbar.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Shaktist is bulbar and a teardrop.; int2 -> int3: the Shaktist is a teardrop.; sent13 -> int4: the Shaktist is a kind of a Gadus if it is a teardrop.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the Shaktist is a Gadus is true.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the Shaktist is an estrus.; sent22 & sent6 -> int7: the letters is not a jackstraw.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is not a jackstraw.; int8 & sent15 -> int9: that the mandrill does not crust senior and is a kind of a tangled is incorrect.; sent17 -> int10: the decoration does not forecast Robeson if that it is not adenocarcinomatous and it does not forecast mercilessness is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__