the barony strolls.
sent1: the coastguardsman does interpret prominence and/or it is a Bosch if the roebuck is not a hoe. sent2: the barony does not stroll if the fact that the art does not drink and is not a cottonwood is not correct. sent3: if something buries the fact that it is not a drink and is not a cottonwood is incorrect. sent4: if something does stroll then it is not a kind of a cottonwood. sent5: if the barony buries and does not stroll then that the call-back does dun Laricariidae is right. sent6: the roebuck does not subdivide vigor and is not healthy if that the isotherm is a kind of a chatelaine hold. sent7: if that something does not dun Laricariidae and interprets Lucullus is false that it does bury hold. sent8: there exists something such that it does not drink. sent9: the call-back does not dun Laricariidae if the coastguardsman does interpret Lucullus. sent10: if something is not a drink then the art is not a kind of a cottonwood. sent11: there is something such that it is a drink. sent12: something strolls and does not interpret Lucullus if it duns Laricariidae. sent13: the art duns Laricariidae if the barony duns Laricariidae. sent14: if the art is not a cottonwood the barony buries. sent15: the call-back does not dun Tanoan if the coastguardsman is a kind of a Bosch. sent16: the isotherm plasters. sent17: if the coastguardsman does interpret prominence the call-back does not dun Tanoan. sent18: if the art strolls and does not interpret Lucullus then the call-back strolls. sent19: something is a chatelaine if it is a plastered. sent20: the coastguardsman does interpret Lucullus. sent21: something is not a kind of a hoe if the fact that it does not subdivide vigor is right. sent22: The Lucullus does interpret coastguardsman.
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: that the art is not a cottonwood is correct.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the barony buries.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barony does not stroll.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the barony buries but it does not stroll.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the call-back duns Laricariidae.; sent9 & sent20 -> int5: the call-back does not dun Laricariidae.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the call-back does bury.
sent4 -> int7: the call-back is not a kind of a cottonwood if it does stroll.; sent12 -> int8: if the art duns Laricariidae then it does stroll and it does not interpret Lucullus.;
$hypothesis$ = the barony strolls. ; $context$ = sent1: the coastguardsman does interpret prominence and/or it is a Bosch if the roebuck is not a hoe. sent2: the barony does not stroll if the fact that the art does not drink and is not a cottonwood is not correct. sent3: if something buries the fact that it is not a drink and is not a cottonwood is incorrect. sent4: if something does stroll then it is not a kind of a cottonwood. sent5: if the barony buries and does not stroll then that the call-back does dun Laricariidae is right. sent6: the roebuck does not subdivide vigor and is not healthy if that the isotherm is a kind of a chatelaine hold. sent7: if that something does not dun Laricariidae and interprets Lucullus is false that it does bury hold. sent8: there exists something such that it does not drink. sent9: the call-back does not dun Laricariidae if the coastguardsman does interpret Lucullus. sent10: if something is not a drink then the art is not a kind of a cottonwood. sent11: there is something such that it is a drink. sent12: something strolls and does not interpret Lucullus if it duns Laricariidae. sent13: the art duns Laricariidae if the barony duns Laricariidae. sent14: if the art is not a cottonwood the barony buries. sent15: the call-back does not dun Tanoan if the coastguardsman is a kind of a Bosch. sent16: the isotherm plasters. sent17: if the coastguardsman does interpret prominence the call-back does not dun Tanoan. sent18: if the art strolls and does not interpret Lucullus then the call-back strolls. sent19: something is a chatelaine if it is a plastered. sent20: the coastguardsman does interpret Lucullus. sent21: something is not a kind of a hoe if the fact that it does not subdivide vigor is right. sent22: The Lucullus does interpret coastguardsman. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent10 -> int1: that the art is not a cottonwood is correct.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the barony buries.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the barony does not stroll.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the barony buries but it does not stroll.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the call-back duns Laricariidae.; sent9 & sent20 -> int5: the call-back does not dun Laricariidae.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__