the fact that there exists something such that if it is a armet and it does fix spindrift then it is non-aldermanic is not right.
sent1: something is not artistic if it parses linemen and it disguises. sent2: the julienne is not aldermanic if it is unchangeable and it is a pedantry. sent3: there is something such that if it is conjunct thing that does confine then it does not article Castilian. sent4: the cholla is not aldermanic if it is a kind of a armet and it fixes spindrift. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Chaetodipterus and it is a sportsmanship it is a kind of a horsecloth. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it parses Ra and does entrench is not false then it is not a subordinate. sent7: if something is a medicine and it does fix patisserie it is not Tantric. sent8: the currycomb thrusts if it fixes proposal and fixes spindrift. sent9: there is something such that if it does article studentship and is unsanitary then it does not parse counterclaim. sent10: if the cholla is a armet and fixes spindrift it is aldermanic. sent11: if something that does article studentship is unquestionable then the fact that it is not a contrabassoon is correct. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a armet that does fix spindrift then it is aldermanic. sent13: the presenter does not article julienne if it is a kind of a skim that fixes spindrift. sent14: there is something such that if it does parse presenter and it is dithyrambic then that it is not a contrabassoon is not false.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it does parse linemen and it disguises then it is not artistic.
sent1 -> int1: the pyocyanin is not artistic if that it parses linemen and it is a disguise is true.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a armet and it does fix spindrift then it is non-aldermanic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not artistic if it parses linemen and it disguises. sent2: the julienne is not aldermanic if it is unchangeable and it is a pedantry. sent3: there is something such that if it is conjunct thing that does confine then it does not article Castilian. sent4: the cholla is not aldermanic if it is a kind of a armet and it fixes spindrift. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a Chaetodipterus and it is a sportsmanship it is a kind of a horsecloth. sent6: there is something such that if the fact that it parses Ra and does entrench is not false then it is not a subordinate. sent7: if something is a medicine and it does fix patisserie it is not Tantric. sent8: the currycomb thrusts if it fixes proposal and fixes spindrift. sent9: there is something such that if it does article studentship and is unsanitary then it does not parse counterclaim. sent10: if the cholla is a armet and fixes spindrift it is aldermanic. sent11: if something that does article studentship is unquestionable then the fact that it is not a contrabassoon is correct. sent12: there exists something such that if it is a armet that does fix spindrift then it is aldermanic. sent13: the presenter does not article julienne if it is a kind of a skim that fixes spindrift. sent14: there is something such that if it does parse presenter and it is dithyrambic then that it is not a contrabassoon is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__