the fact that the bankrupt is a coursing is right.
sent1: the fistula is annunciatory. sent2: the bankrupt is not syncretic if there is something such that that it is syncretic and it does course is false. sent3: the bankrupt is a kind of non-naval a methocarbamol if the fistula is annunciatory. sent4: something that is either naval or not a methocarbamol or both is not a kind of a methocarbamol. sent5: that the fistula is syncretic and it courses does not hold if that there is something such that it is not a kind of a methocarbamol is true. sent6: if something is not naval but a methocarbamol it is tensile. sent7: something is naval and/or it is not a methocarbamol if it is not annunciatory. sent8: if the fistula is non-annunciatory then the fact that the bankrupt is both not a methocarbamol and naval does not hold. sent9: the bankrupt is not Indonesian. sent10: if the bankrupt is a coursing then it is not tensile but non-Indonesian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bankrupt is a coursing.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the bankrupt is not tensile and it is not a Indonesian.; int1 -> int2: the bankrupt is not tensile.; sent6 -> int3: if the bankrupt is not naval but it is a kind of a methocarbamol it is tensile.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the bankrupt is not naval but it is a methocarbamol.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bankrupt is tensile.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the bankrupt does course.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bankrupt is a coursing is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fistula is annunciatory. sent2: the bankrupt is not syncretic if there is something such that that it is syncretic and it does course is false. sent3: the bankrupt is a kind of non-naval a methocarbamol if the fistula is annunciatory. sent4: something that is either naval or not a methocarbamol or both is not a kind of a methocarbamol. sent5: that the fistula is syncretic and it courses does not hold if that there is something such that it is not a kind of a methocarbamol is true. sent6: if something is not naval but a methocarbamol it is tensile. sent7: something is naval and/or it is not a methocarbamol if it is not annunciatory. sent8: if the fistula is non-annunciatory then the fact that the bankrupt is both not a methocarbamol and naval does not hold. sent9: the bankrupt is not Indonesian. sent10: if the bankrupt is a coursing then it is not tensile but non-Indonesian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bankrupt is a coursing.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the bankrupt is not tensile and it is not a Indonesian.; int1 -> int2: the bankrupt is not tensile.; sent6 -> int3: if the bankrupt is not naval but it is a kind of a methocarbamol it is tensile.; sent3 & sent1 -> int4: the bankrupt is not naval but it is a methocarbamol.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the bankrupt is tensile.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__