the flunitrazepan does not camouflage tenter.
sent1: something does not camouflage tenter if that it is not testaceous and it does not camouflage entirety is not correct. sent2: the dining-room is a kind of a blotch. sent3: the toiler does not detribalize taxation. sent4: if the dining-room is a kind of a rubber then the flunitrazepan does camouflage tenter. sent5: the dining-room is handmade if the flunitrazepan is handmade. sent6: the fact that the harmonium is not thallophytic but it does maintain nightrider is false if the dining-room is handmade. sent7: the dining-room is a blotch and it is a rubber if it is not a kind of a mesomorphy. sent8: the dining-room is a kind of a mesomorphy if it is not a kind of a support. sent9: the dining-room is not a mesomorphy. sent10: that something is not testaceous and it does not camouflage entirety is not correct if it is thallophytic. sent11: the fact that the flunitrazepan is non-gymnosophical a clomipramine is false if there exists something such that that it does not detribalize taxation hold. sent12: if the dining-room is not a mesomorphy then it is a blotch. sent13: if that something is non-thallophytic thing that maintains nightrider is not right then it is non-thallophytic. sent14: if something camouflages entirety and is not a mesomorphy the flunitrazepan does not camouflage tenter. sent15: if that something is a kind of non-gymnosophical a clomipramine is incorrect it is handmade. sent16: something is a mesomorphy that does detribalize Taney if it does not camouflage tenter. sent17: if there is something such that that it is testaceous is right the dining-room camouflages entirety and is not a kind of a mesomorphy.
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the dining-room is a kind of a blotch and it is a rubber.; int1 -> int2: the dining-room is a kind of a rubber.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the flunitrazepan does not camouflage tenter hold.
$hypothesis$ = the flunitrazepan does not camouflage tenter. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not camouflage tenter if that it is not testaceous and it does not camouflage entirety is not correct. sent2: the dining-room is a kind of a blotch. sent3: the toiler does not detribalize taxation. sent4: if the dining-room is a kind of a rubber then the flunitrazepan does camouflage tenter. sent5: the dining-room is handmade if the flunitrazepan is handmade. sent6: the fact that the harmonium is not thallophytic but it does maintain nightrider is false if the dining-room is handmade. sent7: the dining-room is a blotch and it is a rubber if it is not a kind of a mesomorphy. sent8: the dining-room is a kind of a mesomorphy if it is not a kind of a support. sent9: the dining-room is not a mesomorphy. sent10: that something is not testaceous and it does not camouflage entirety is not correct if it is thallophytic. sent11: the fact that the flunitrazepan is non-gymnosophical a clomipramine is false if there exists something such that that it does not detribalize taxation hold. sent12: if the dining-room is not a mesomorphy then it is a blotch. sent13: if that something is non-thallophytic thing that maintains nightrider is not right then it is non-thallophytic. sent14: if something camouflages entirety and is not a mesomorphy the flunitrazepan does not camouflage tenter. sent15: if that something is a kind of non-gymnosophical a clomipramine is incorrect it is handmade. sent16: something is a mesomorphy that does detribalize Taney if it does not camouflage tenter. sent17: if there is something such that that it is testaceous is right the dining-room camouflages entirety and is not a kind of a mesomorphy. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent9 -> int1: the dining-room is a kind of a blotch and it is a rubber.; int1 -> int2: the dining-room is a kind of a rubber.; sent4 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__