the fact that the paidness and the repining K.E. happens does not hold.
sent1: if that both the paidness and the repining K.E. happens is incorrect then the cinching does not occur. sent2: the confusing twistwood occurs if the pegging graphologist happens. sent3: that the superiority occurs is prevented by that the confusing twistwood happens. sent4: the historiography does not occur. sent5: the capitalization does not occur if the fact that the skipping but not the sub-test occurs does not hold. sent6: that the pegging lady's-eardrop does not occur is not false if the fact that the bedrest occurs and the pegging lady's-eardrop happens is not true. sent7: if that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs is not true the algalness does not occur. sent8: the considerateness happens if the caliconess occurs. sent9: that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs is not true if the historiography does not occur. sent10: the non-caliconess yields that the algalness occurs. sent11: that the confusing GMT does not occur is triggered by that the algalness but not the emaciating happens. sent12: that the historiography occurs triggers that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs. sent13: both the substituting and the pegging graphologist occurs if the pegging lady's-eardrop does not occur. sent14: that the confusing GMT happens or the calico does not occur or both is brought about by that the cinching does not occur. sent15: the fact that that the bedrest happens and the pegging lady's-eardrop happens hold is incorrect if the capitalization does not occur. sent16: that the cinch does not occur is caused by that the repining K.E. does not occur. sent17: the algalness is caused by that the confusing GMT occurs and/or that the calico does not occur. sent18: if that the castigation does not occur but the repudiating occurs is incorrect the thunderstorm does not occur. sent19: that the thunderstorm does not occur causes that the historiography and the low-resolutionness occurs. sent20: if the fact that the superiority does not occur is not wrong that the castigation does not occur and the repudiating happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the paidness and the repining K.E. occurs is wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the cinching does not occur.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the confusing GMT and/or the non-caliconess occurs.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the algalness happens.; sent9 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs does not hold.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: that the algalness does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the considerateness happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the paidness and the repining K.E. happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if that both the paidness and the repining K.E. happens is incorrect then the cinching does not occur. sent2: the confusing twistwood occurs if the pegging graphologist happens. sent3: that the superiority occurs is prevented by that the confusing twistwood happens. sent4: the historiography does not occur. sent5: the capitalization does not occur if the fact that the skipping but not the sub-test occurs does not hold. sent6: that the pegging lady's-eardrop does not occur is not false if the fact that the bedrest occurs and the pegging lady's-eardrop happens is not true. sent7: if that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs is not true the algalness does not occur. sent8: the considerateness happens if the caliconess occurs. sent9: that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs is not true if the historiography does not occur. sent10: the non-caliconess yields that the algalness occurs. sent11: that the confusing GMT does not occur is triggered by that the algalness but not the emaciating happens. sent12: that the historiography occurs triggers that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs. sent13: both the substituting and the pegging graphologist occurs if the pegging lady's-eardrop does not occur. sent14: that the confusing GMT happens or the calico does not occur or both is brought about by that the cinching does not occur. sent15: the fact that that the bedrest happens and the pegging lady's-eardrop happens hold is incorrect if the capitalization does not occur. sent16: that the cinch does not occur is caused by that the repining K.E. does not occur. sent17: the algalness is caused by that the confusing GMT occurs and/or that the calico does not occur. sent18: if that the castigation does not occur but the repudiating occurs is incorrect the thunderstorm does not occur. sent19: that the thunderstorm does not occur causes that the historiography and the low-resolutionness occurs. sent20: if the fact that the superiority does not occur is not wrong that the castigation does not occur and the repudiating happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the paidness and the repining K.E. occurs is wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the cinching does not occur.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the confusing GMT and/or the non-caliconess occurs.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the algalness happens.; sent9 & sent4 -> int4: the fact that the algalness but not the emaciating occurs does not hold.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: that the algalness does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__