if the fact that the nozzle does not infiltrate and does conventionalize intrusion is not right then the lull exists.
sent1: if the pylon does steel proofed the Ute is trophoblastic and does not steel proofed. sent2: the lull does exist if the Ute is trophoblastic but it does not steel proofed. sent3: if the leopard is not immodest then the pylon does steel proofed. sent4: if that the nozzle does not infiltrate and conventionalizes intrusion does not hold then the leopard is not immodest. sent5: if the Ute does not conventionalize intrusion then the nozzle is trophoblastic. sent6: the wretch is a ICAO but it does not steel proofed. sent7: if the pylon steels proofed and is not immodest then the fact that the nozzle infiltrates is not incorrect. sent8: that the leopard is not immodest if the nozzle infiltrates hold. sent9: the leopard does not infiltrate. sent10: the Ute is ballistic. sent11: the fact that the nozzle does not steel proofed and infiltrates does not hold. sent12: if the nozzle does steel proofed and does not infiltrate then the Ute conventionalizes intrusion. sent13: the lull does exist if the nozzle infiltrates. sent14: the leopard does not steel proofed if that the Ute is not trophoblastic but it is immodest is incorrect. sent15: the leopard is not immodest if the nozzle does not infiltrate but it conventionalizes intrusion. sent16: the nozzle does conventionalize intrusion and does not steel proofed if the Ute does steel proofed.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the nozzle does not infiltrate but it does conventionalize intrusion is not correct.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the leopard is not immodest.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the pylon steels proofed.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the Ute is trophoblastic but it does not steel proofed.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that the lull does exist hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that the nozzle does not infiltrate and does conventionalize intrusion is not right then the lull exists. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pylon does steel proofed the Ute is trophoblastic and does not steel proofed. sent2: the lull does exist if the Ute is trophoblastic but it does not steel proofed. sent3: if the leopard is not immodest then the pylon does steel proofed. sent4: if that the nozzle does not infiltrate and conventionalizes intrusion does not hold then the leopard is not immodest. sent5: if the Ute does not conventionalize intrusion then the nozzle is trophoblastic. sent6: the wretch is a ICAO but it does not steel proofed. sent7: if the pylon steels proofed and is not immodest then the fact that the nozzle infiltrates is not incorrect. sent8: that the leopard is not immodest if the nozzle infiltrates hold. sent9: the leopard does not infiltrate. sent10: the Ute is ballistic. sent11: the fact that the nozzle does not steel proofed and infiltrates does not hold. sent12: if the nozzle does steel proofed and does not infiltrate then the Ute conventionalizes intrusion. sent13: the lull does exist if the nozzle infiltrates. sent14: the leopard does not steel proofed if that the Ute is not trophoblastic but it is immodest is incorrect. sent15: the leopard is not immodest if the nozzle does not infiltrate but it conventionalizes intrusion. sent16: the nozzle does conventionalize intrusion and does not steel proofed if the Ute does steel proofed. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the nozzle does not infiltrate but it does conventionalize intrusion is not correct.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the leopard is not immodest.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: the pylon steels proofed.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the Ute is trophoblastic but it does not steel proofed.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: that the lull does exist hold.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__