there is something such that if it is axiological it is not stomatal and it is not a hyoid.
sent1: if that the trey is either not a butch or a tabloid or both is incorrect the fact that it is axiological hold. sent2: if the trey is Beethovenian then it is not hyoid. sent3: there is something such that if it is abstract then the fact that it is not a kind of a glycogen is right. sent4: if something is lowborn it is literal and it is not horse-drawn. sent5: that the trey does chirr and is not axiological if the trey is a clipping is right. sent6: if the trey is a kind of a squawk the fact that it is a collards that is not independent is correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is a tabloid then it is not a hyoid and not stomatal. sent8: if the fact that the trey is a butch and/or is a tabloid does not hold then it is not axiological. sent9: something is not a kind of a Goya and does not read transference if it is an exchange. sent10: the trey is a kind of a butch. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a tabloid then it is not a butch and is stomatal. sent12: if the trey is coccal it is a kind of a fasciculation and it is not axonal. sent13: the trey is not diplomatic or stomatal or both. sent14: either the trey is not a kind of a serosa or it is axiological or both. sent15: the trey is not perennial. sent16: if the fluorescence does dribble it is Beethovenian. sent17: there is something such that if it is a tabloid then it is not a butch and it is not stomatal. sent18: something is not stomatal and it is not a hyoid if that it is Beethovenian is not false. sent19: the fact that if that the trey is not a kind of a butch or it is a kind of the tabloid or both is not true then the trey is not axiological is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the trey is not a butch or it is a tabloid or both is not correct.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: that the trey is not axiological is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trey is axiological.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the trey is not a kind of a butch or is a kind of a tabloid or both is not false.; sent18 -> int4: the trey is not stomatal and not hyoid if it is Beethovenian.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is axiological it is not stomatal and it is not a hyoid. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the trey is either not a butch or a tabloid or both is incorrect the fact that it is axiological hold. sent2: if the trey is Beethovenian then it is not hyoid. sent3: there is something such that if it is abstract then the fact that it is not a kind of a glycogen is right. sent4: if something is lowborn it is literal and it is not horse-drawn. sent5: that the trey does chirr and is not axiological if the trey is a clipping is right. sent6: if the trey is a kind of a squawk the fact that it is a collards that is not independent is correct. sent7: there is something such that if it is a tabloid then it is not a hyoid and not stomatal. sent8: if the fact that the trey is a butch and/or is a tabloid does not hold then it is not axiological. sent9: something is not a kind of a Goya and does not read transference if it is an exchange. sent10: the trey is a kind of a butch. sent11: there exists something such that if it is a tabloid then it is not a butch and is stomatal. sent12: if the trey is coccal it is a kind of a fasciculation and it is not axonal. sent13: the trey is not diplomatic or stomatal or both. sent14: either the trey is not a kind of a serosa or it is axiological or both. sent15: the trey is not perennial. sent16: if the fluorescence does dribble it is Beethovenian. sent17: there is something such that if it is a tabloid then it is not a butch and it is not stomatal. sent18: something is not stomatal and it is not a hyoid if that it is Beethovenian is not false. sent19: the fact that if that the trey is not a kind of a butch or it is a kind of the tabloid or both is not true then the trey is not axiological is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the trey is not a butch or it is a tabloid or both is not correct.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: that the trey is not axiological is not wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the trey is axiological.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the trey is not a kind of a butch or is a kind of a tabloid or both is not false.; sent18 -> int4: the trey is not stomatal and not hyoid if it is Beethovenian.; __UNKNOWN__