the fact that if the backspin happens then that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur is incorrect is not right.
sent1: that the bogging Constantinople but not the palingeneticness occurs triggers that the weeding does not occur. sent2: if the backspin happens then the fact that the situation does not occur but the winnowing vantage happens is not correct. sent3: that the backspin happens is prevented by that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur. sent4: the fact that the holozoicness does not occur and the infusion does not occur is not right if the pyrecticness does not occur. sent5: if the reclining happens then the fact that the unpicking welcoming does not occur and the one-upmanship happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the backspin does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the backspin happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the holozoicness does not occur and the infusion does not occur is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the backspin happens then that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur is incorrect is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bogging Constantinople but not the palingeneticness occurs triggers that the weeding does not occur. sent2: if the backspin happens then the fact that the situation does not occur but the winnowing vantage happens is not correct. sent3: that the backspin happens is prevented by that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur. sent4: the fact that the holozoicness does not occur and the infusion does not occur is not right if the pyrecticness does not occur. sent5: if the reclining happens then the fact that the unpicking welcoming does not occur and the one-upmanship happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the backspin does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the backspin happens.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the situation does not occur and the winnowing vantage does not occur is not true.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__