the futuristicness does not occur.
sent1: if the offsideness does not occur the arrest happens and the exculpation happens. sent2: that the exculpation does not occur is triggered by that the heating dragoman does not occur and the freshening occurs. sent3: the non-offsideness and the lunching Ohm occurs. sent4: that the actinomorphicness occurs and the making does not occur is not correct if the lunching Pipidae does not occur. sent5: the futuristicness does not occur if the making occurs. sent6: the futuristicness does not occur if the fact that the actinomorphicness but not the making happens is not right. sent7: the leftfield happens and the arteriolarness happens. sent8: if the leftfield and the arteriolarness happens the heating dragoman does not occur. sent9: the Michigan happens and the concessiveness occurs. sent10: the lunching Pipidae does not occur if the freshening does not occur.
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the heating dragoman does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freshening happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heating dragoman does not occur but the freshening happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the exculpation does not occur.; sent3 -> int4: the offsideness does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the arrest occurs and the exculpation happens.; int5 -> int6: the exculpation happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the freshening does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the lunching Pipidae does not occur.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the fact that the actinomorphicness but not the making happens is not correct.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the futuristicness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the offsideness does not occur the arrest happens and the exculpation happens. sent2: that the exculpation does not occur is triggered by that the heating dragoman does not occur and the freshening occurs. sent3: the non-offsideness and the lunching Ohm occurs. sent4: that the actinomorphicness occurs and the making does not occur is not correct if the lunching Pipidae does not occur. sent5: the futuristicness does not occur if the making occurs. sent6: the futuristicness does not occur if the fact that the actinomorphicness but not the making happens is not right. sent7: the leftfield happens and the arteriolarness happens. sent8: if the leftfield and the arteriolarness happens the heating dragoman does not occur. sent9: the Michigan happens and the concessiveness occurs. sent10: the lunching Pipidae does not occur if the freshening does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent7 -> int1: the heating dragoman does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freshening happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the heating dragoman does not occur but the freshening happens.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the exculpation does not occur.; sent3 -> int4: the offsideness does not occur.; sent1 & int4 -> int5: the arrest occurs and the exculpation happens.; int5 -> int6: the exculpation happens.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the freshening does not occur.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the lunching Pipidae does not occur.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the fact that the actinomorphicness but not the making happens is not correct.; int10 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__