the accentualness occurs and the sustentacularness happens.
sent1: the fact that both the resuscitation and the non-supernaturalistness occurs is incorrect if the synopticness does not occur. sent2: that the spraying gametophore happens is not false if both the non-sureness and the non-technophilicness occurs. sent3: if either the compulsion does not occur or the communicating intercommunion occurs or both then the sureness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the supernaturalistness occurs hold. sent5: if both the septicness and the synopticness happens the truncation does not occur. sent6: the synopticness does not occur and the truncation does not occur if the sustentacularness does not occur. sent7: either the compulsion does not occur or the communicating intercommunion occurs or both. sent8: the re-formation does not occur. sent9: if the compulsion happens then the non-sureness and the non-technophilicness happens. sent10: if the fact that the communicating leapfrog but not the spraying gametophore happens is not correct the largeness does not occur. sent11: the communicating leapfrog and/or that the supernaturalistness happens is caused by the non-synopticness. sent12: that both the supernaturalistness and the communicating leapfrog occurs results in that the spraying gametophore does not occur. sent13: that the re-formation does not occur brings about that the communicating intercommunion occurs and the synopticness occurs. sent14: that the communicating leapfrog does not occur yields that the septicness occurs. sent15: that the accentualness occurs and the sustentacularness occurs is not correct if the truncation does not occur. sent16: if that the resuscitation happens and the supernaturalistness does not occur does not hold the fact that the resuscitation does not occur is not incorrect. sent17: the compulsion occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communicating leapfrog happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the supernaturalistness and the communicating leapfrog happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the spraying gametophore does not occur.; sent9 & sent17 -> int3: the sureness does not occur and the technophilicness does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the spraying gametophore occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the communicating leapfrog does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the septicness occurs.; sent13 & sent8 -> int8: the communicating intercommunion occurs and the synopticness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the synopticness happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the septicness and the synopticness happens.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the truncation does not occur.; int11 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the large does not occur and the resuscitation does not occur.
sent3 & sent7 -> int12: the sureness does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the accentualness occurs and the sustentacularness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the resuscitation and the non-supernaturalistness occurs is incorrect if the synopticness does not occur. sent2: that the spraying gametophore happens is not false if both the non-sureness and the non-technophilicness occurs. sent3: if either the compulsion does not occur or the communicating intercommunion occurs or both then the sureness does not occur. sent4: the fact that the supernaturalistness occurs hold. sent5: if both the septicness and the synopticness happens the truncation does not occur. sent6: the synopticness does not occur and the truncation does not occur if the sustentacularness does not occur. sent7: either the compulsion does not occur or the communicating intercommunion occurs or both. sent8: the re-formation does not occur. sent9: if the compulsion happens then the non-sureness and the non-technophilicness happens. sent10: if the fact that the communicating leapfrog but not the spraying gametophore happens is not correct the largeness does not occur. sent11: the communicating leapfrog and/or that the supernaturalistness happens is caused by the non-synopticness. sent12: that both the supernaturalistness and the communicating leapfrog occurs results in that the spraying gametophore does not occur. sent13: that the re-formation does not occur brings about that the communicating intercommunion occurs and the synopticness occurs. sent14: that the communicating leapfrog does not occur yields that the septicness occurs. sent15: that the accentualness occurs and the sustentacularness occurs is not correct if the truncation does not occur. sent16: if that the resuscitation happens and the supernaturalistness does not occur does not hold the fact that the resuscitation does not occur is not incorrect. sent17: the compulsion occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the communicating leapfrog happens.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: both the supernaturalistness and the communicating leapfrog happens.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the spraying gametophore does not occur.; sent9 & sent17 -> int3: the sureness does not occur and the technophilicness does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the spraying gametophore occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the communicating leapfrog does not occur.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the septicness occurs.; sent13 & sent8 -> int8: the communicating intercommunion occurs and the synopticness occurs.; int8 -> int9: the synopticness happens.; int7 & int9 -> int10: both the septicness and the synopticness happens.; int10 & sent5 -> int11: the truncation does not occur.; int11 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__