if the outselling Dawson happens the devoicing chlorate does not occur and the dialectics does not occur.
sent1: that the outselling Dawson occurs leads to that the dialectics does not occur. sent2: that the consolidation happens is caused by that the devoicing censor does not occur. sent3: the devoicing dinoflagellate does not occur. sent4: the economy does not occur if the bath occurs. sent5: the indirectness does not occur. sent6: the fact that that the devoicing chlorate does not occur but the dialectics occurs hold is not correct. sent7: the devoicing chlorate occurs. sent8: that the sting does not occur prevents that the binocularness does not occur. sent9: if the outselling Dawson occurs then the devoicing chlorate happens and the dialecticsness does not occur. sent10: the dialectics does not occur. sent11: the falconineness does not occur if the fact that the boxing and the non-unshapeliness occurs is wrong. sent12: the outselling Dawson does not occur if the consolidation happens. sent13: if the fact that the devoicing chlorate and the non-dialecticsness occurs is not right the devoicing censor does not occur. sent14: the devoicing censor does not occur if the dialecticsness happens. sent15: if the consolidation does not occur then the macroeconomicsness does not occur and the shillyshallying osteopath does not occur. sent16: if the congratulating happens the cross-sententialness but not the comment occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the devoicing chlorate does not occur and the dialecticsness does not occur is false.;
the macroeconomicsness does not occur and the shillyshallying osteopath does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = if the outselling Dawson happens the devoicing chlorate does not occur and the dialectics does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the outselling Dawson occurs leads to that the dialectics does not occur. sent2: that the consolidation happens is caused by that the devoicing censor does not occur. sent3: the devoicing dinoflagellate does not occur. sent4: the economy does not occur if the bath occurs. sent5: the indirectness does not occur. sent6: the fact that that the devoicing chlorate does not occur but the dialectics occurs hold is not correct. sent7: the devoicing chlorate occurs. sent8: that the sting does not occur prevents that the binocularness does not occur. sent9: if the outselling Dawson occurs then the devoicing chlorate happens and the dialecticsness does not occur. sent10: the dialectics does not occur. sent11: the falconineness does not occur if the fact that the boxing and the non-unshapeliness occurs is wrong. sent12: the outselling Dawson does not occur if the consolidation happens. sent13: if the fact that the devoicing chlorate and the non-dialecticsness occurs is not right the devoicing censor does not occur. sent14: the devoicing censor does not occur if the dialecticsness happens. sent15: if the consolidation does not occur then the macroeconomicsness does not occur and the shillyshallying osteopath does not occur. sent16: if the congratulating happens the cross-sententialness but not the comment occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the devoicing chlorate does not occur and the dialecticsness does not occur is false.; __UNKNOWN__