the capsaicin is not a kind of a bandstand.
sent1: there exists nothing that is a kind of fugal thing that does not knot adenoidectomy. sent2: that the monocarp does not knot inconclusiveness but it is aquicultural is not true if it is not inorganic. sent3: something is not a bimetal but it is epidemiologic if it is not a foot-lambert. sent4: if the fact that that the mead is a formulary and is not a anteroom is not false does not hold it is a Shawwal. sent5: if something does knot Tenrecidae it is not a kind of a Shawwal. sent6: the eft does knot Tenrecidae if that it is an arming is correct. sent7: the eft is not a bandstand if it is a Shawwal. sent8: that the fact that the eft is fugal and does knot adenoidectomy is right is wrong. sent9: something that knots adenoidectomy is a kind of a Shawwal. sent10: the capsaicin knots adenoidectomy. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does not transubstantiate is correct the endoderm is obstetric and fugal. sent12: everything is not a kind of a foot-lambert. sent13: if something is a Genesis and it does knot inconclusiveness then the fact that it is not a selvage hold. sent14: that the taconite does not knot adenoidectomy and it is not a Shawwal is incorrect if something is fugal. sent15: the sulcus does not transubstantiate if the monocarp is not a selvage. sent16: if that the eft is not an arming and not a bandstand is wrong the capsaicin is not a bandstand. sent17: the eft is a kind of a Shawwal if it does knot adenoidectomy. sent18: the fact that the nitrobacteria does knot Floridian is true if it is a Shawwal. sent19: that the eft is a kind of a bandstand but it does not arm is not correct if there is something such that it does not knot Tenrecidae. sent20: the capsaicin is a kind of a bandstand if the eft is not an arming. sent21: something knots inconclusiveness if the fact that it does not knots inconclusiveness and is not non-aquicultural is not right. sent22: something is a kind of a Shawwal if that it is fugal and it does not knot adenoidectomy is not right. sent23: the number does not knot Tenrecidae if the fact that the taconite does not knot adenoidectomy and is not a Shawwal is wrong. sent24: the monocarp is a Genesis if it is epidemiologic. sent25: everything is not inorganic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eft is an arming.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the eft does knot Tenrecidae.; sent5 -> int2: the eft is not a Shawwal if it knots Tenrecidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eft is not a kind of a Shawwal.; sent22 -> int4: the eft is a Shawwal if that it is fugal and it does not knot adenoidectomy is wrong.; sent1 -> int5: the fact that the eft is fugal but it does not knot adenoidectomy is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the eft is a Shawwal.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the eft does not arm.; int8 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
that the capsaicin is not a bandstand hold.
sent21 -> int9: if the fact that the monocarp does not knot inconclusiveness but it is aquicultural does not hold then it does knot inconclusiveness.; sent25 -> int10: the monocarp is not inorganic.; sent2 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the monocarp does not knot inconclusiveness but it is aquicultural is wrong.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the monocarp knots inconclusiveness.; sent3 -> int13: if the galactagogue is not a foot-lambert it is not a kind of a bimetal and is epidemiologic.; sent12 -> int14: the galactagogue is not a foot-lambert.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the galactagogue is not a kind of a bimetal but it is epidemiologic.; int15 -> int16: everything is not a bimetal and it is epidemiologic.; int16 -> int17: the meal is not a bimetal but epidemiologic.; int17 -> int18: the fact that the meal is not non-epidemiologic is true.; int18 -> int19: everything is epidemiologic.; int19 -> int20: the monocarp is epidemiologic.; int20 & sent24 -> int21: the monocarp is a kind of a Genesis.; int12 & int21 -> int22: the monocarp is a kind of a Genesis and it knots inconclusiveness.; sent13 -> int23: if the monocarp is a Genesis and it knots inconclusiveness it is not a selvage.; int22 & int23 -> int24: the monocarp is not a selvage.; int24 & sent15 -> int25: that the sulcus transubstantiates is false.; int25 -> int26: something does not transubstantiate.; sent11 & int26 -> int27: the endoderm is not non-obstetric and not non-fugal.; int27 -> int28: the endoderm is fugal.; int28 -> int29: there exists something such that it is fugal.; int29 & sent14 -> int30: that the taconite does not knot adenoidectomy and it is not a Shawwal is wrong.; sent23 & int30 -> int31: the number does not knot Tenrecidae.; int31 -> int32: there exists something such that it does not knot Tenrecidae.; int32 & sent19 -> int33: the fact that the fact that the eft is a kind of a bandstand and is not an arming is not false is not true.; int33 -> int34: there is something such that the fact that it is a bandstand that is not an arming is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the capsaicin is not a kind of a bandstand. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists nothing that is a kind of fugal thing that does not knot adenoidectomy. sent2: that the monocarp does not knot inconclusiveness but it is aquicultural is not true if it is not inorganic. sent3: something is not a bimetal but it is epidemiologic if it is not a foot-lambert. sent4: if the fact that that the mead is a formulary and is not a anteroom is not false does not hold it is a Shawwal. sent5: if something does knot Tenrecidae it is not a kind of a Shawwal. sent6: the eft does knot Tenrecidae if that it is an arming is correct. sent7: the eft is not a bandstand if it is a Shawwal. sent8: that the fact that the eft is fugal and does knot adenoidectomy is right is wrong. sent9: something that knots adenoidectomy is a kind of a Shawwal. sent10: the capsaicin knots adenoidectomy. sent11: if there is something such that the fact that it does not transubstantiate is correct the endoderm is obstetric and fugal. sent12: everything is not a kind of a foot-lambert. sent13: if something is a Genesis and it does knot inconclusiveness then the fact that it is not a selvage hold. sent14: that the taconite does not knot adenoidectomy and it is not a Shawwal is incorrect if something is fugal. sent15: the sulcus does not transubstantiate if the monocarp is not a selvage. sent16: if that the eft is not an arming and not a bandstand is wrong the capsaicin is not a bandstand. sent17: the eft is a kind of a Shawwal if it does knot adenoidectomy. sent18: the fact that the nitrobacteria does knot Floridian is true if it is a Shawwal. sent19: that the eft is a kind of a bandstand but it does not arm is not correct if there is something such that it does not knot Tenrecidae. sent20: the capsaicin is a kind of a bandstand if the eft is not an arming. sent21: something knots inconclusiveness if the fact that it does not knots inconclusiveness and is not non-aquicultural is not right. sent22: something is a kind of a Shawwal if that it is fugal and it does not knot adenoidectomy is not right. sent23: the number does not knot Tenrecidae if the fact that the taconite does not knot adenoidectomy and is not a Shawwal is wrong. sent24: the monocarp is a Genesis if it is epidemiologic. sent25: everything is not inorganic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the eft is an arming.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the eft does knot Tenrecidae.; sent5 -> int2: the eft is not a Shawwal if it knots Tenrecidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eft is not a kind of a Shawwal.; sent22 -> int4: the eft is a Shawwal if that it is fugal and it does not knot adenoidectomy is wrong.; sent1 -> int5: the fact that the eft is fugal but it does not knot adenoidectomy is false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the eft is a Shawwal.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the eft does not arm.; int8 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__