the seconder is agreeable.
sent1: that that the Cornus is both a Tampere and elegant is not false is not correct. sent2: the turning is not Chian if the delayer is not calcific. sent3: if something is not Chian and/or it is not a Wood then it does not rubbish suspension. sent4: if the turning is not Chian the pyx is not Chian and/or is not a Wood. sent5: that the macon is not a papaya and it does not rubbish suspension is wrong if the pyx does not rubbish suspension. sent6: if the distaff is immanent the fact that the seconder is not inhospitable and it is immanent is false. sent7: something is not agreeable if the fact that it is not inhospitable and is not immanent is not right. sent8: the distaff is immanent if the fact that the macon is not a kind of a papaya and it does not rubbish suspension is incorrect. sent9: the delayer is non-calcific if that the fact that the Cornus is a Tampere and it is elegant is right is false. sent10: the cowfish does not rubbish jackpot or it is not a nonsmoker or both if the Cornus is not Chian.
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the delayer is not calcific.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the turning is not Chian.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the pyx is not Chian and/or it is not a Wood.; sent3 -> int4: the pyx does not rubbish suspension if either it is not Chian or it is not a Wood or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pyx does not rubbish suspension.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the macon is not a kind of a papaya and it does not rubbish suspension is wrong.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the distaff is immanent.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the fact that the seconder is not inhospitable and it is not immanent does not hold.; sent7 -> int9: the seconder is not agreeable if the fact that it is both not inhospitable and not immanent is incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the cowfish does not rubbish jackpot and/or it is not a nonsmoker.
$hypothesis$ = the seconder is agreeable. ; $context$ = sent1: that that the Cornus is both a Tampere and elegant is not false is not correct. sent2: the turning is not Chian if the delayer is not calcific. sent3: if something is not Chian and/or it is not a Wood then it does not rubbish suspension. sent4: if the turning is not Chian the pyx is not Chian and/or is not a Wood. sent5: that the macon is not a papaya and it does not rubbish suspension is wrong if the pyx does not rubbish suspension. sent6: if the distaff is immanent the fact that the seconder is not inhospitable and it is immanent is false. sent7: something is not agreeable if the fact that it is not inhospitable and is not immanent is not right. sent8: the distaff is immanent if the fact that the macon is not a kind of a papaya and it does not rubbish suspension is incorrect. sent9: the delayer is non-calcific if that the fact that the Cornus is a Tampere and it is elegant is right is false. sent10: the cowfish does not rubbish jackpot or it is not a nonsmoker or both if the Cornus is not Chian. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the delayer is not calcific.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the turning is not Chian.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the pyx is not Chian and/or it is not a Wood.; sent3 -> int4: the pyx does not rubbish suspension if either it is not Chian or it is not a Wood or both.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the pyx does not rubbish suspension.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: that the macon is not a kind of a papaya and it does not rubbish suspension is wrong.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the distaff is immanent.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the fact that the seconder is not inhospitable and it is not immanent does not hold.; sent7 -> int9: the seconder is not agreeable if the fact that it is both not inhospitable and not immanent is incorrect.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__