there is something such that the fact that it is both a bioflavinoid and not a Allen does not hold.
sent1: if the cenobite is not a Allen the fact that it is synergistic and it is not a bioflavinoid is false. sent2: the cenobite is a million. sent3: if the cenobite is not synergistic then that it is a kind of a bioflavinoid that does not fart mobcap is wrong. sent4: the cenobite is not a bioflavinoid if the oubliette is a bioflavinoid but it is not synergistic. sent5: the fact that the oubliette does fart mobcap and it is a bioflavinoid is incorrect if it is not synergistic. sent6: the oubliette is a biomedicine. sent7: the fact that the cenobite farts mobcap and is not a kind of a bioflavinoid is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the cenobite is a kind of a bioflavinoid and is a Allen is not right if it is not synergistic. sent9: the cenobite is a kind of a mercifulness but it is not Prakritic. sent10: the cenobite is carroty thing that does not freckle topography. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a bioflavinoid and is not a Allen does not hold if it does not fart mobcap. sent12: there exists something such that it is both a traffic and not a Gray. sent13: the oubliette is synergistic but it is not a Allen. sent14: the cenobite does fart mobcap and is not synergistic. sent15: that the cenobite is a Allen but it does not fart mobcap is incorrect. sent16: if something does not freckle deadlocked the fact that it is astrophysical and it is aerolitic is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the cenobite does not freckle Icelander hold the fact that it cycles and it is not a toxicity is not correct.
sent11 -> int1: if the oubliette does not fart mobcap then the fact that it is both a bioflavinoid and not a Allen is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that the fact that it is both a bioflavinoid and not a Allen does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cenobite is not a Allen the fact that it is synergistic and it is not a bioflavinoid is false. sent2: the cenobite is a million. sent3: if the cenobite is not synergistic then that it is a kind of a bioflavinoid that does not fart mobcap is wrong. sent4: the cenobite is not a bioflavinoid if the oubliette is a bioflavinoid but it is not synergistic. sent5: the fact that the oubliette does fart mobcap and it is a bioflavinoid is incorrect if it is not synergistic. sent6: the oubliette is a biomedicine. sent7: the fact that the cenobite farts mobcap and is not a kind of a bioflavinoid is incorrect. sent8: the fact that the cenobite is a kind of a bioflavinoid and is a Allen is not right if it is not synergistic. sent9: the cenobite is a kind of a mercifulness but it is not Prakritic. sent10: the cenobite is carroty thing that does not freckle topography. sent11: the fact that something is a kind of a bioflavinoid and is not a Allen does not hold if it does not fart mobcap. sent12: there exists something such that it is both a traffic and not a Gray. sent13: the oubliette is synergistic but it is not a Allen. sent14: the cenobite does fart mobcap and is not synergistic. sent15: that the cenobite is a Allen but it does not fart mobcap is incorrect. sent16: if something does not freckle deadlocked the fact that it is astrophysical and it is aerolitic is incorrect. sent17: if the fact that the cenobite does not freckle Icelander hold the fact that it cycles and it is not a toxicity is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: if the oubliette does not fart mobcap then the fact that it is both a bioflavinoid and not a Allen is not true.; __UNKNOWN__