the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman.
sent1: the fact that something is a orology and/or not a war does not hold if it is catalectic. sent2: if the grease-gun either does not draw rhonchus or does tuck or both then the seawater does reflectorize Ottoman. sent3: if the fact that the seawater is not a tuck or is developmental or both hold the dronabinol reflectorizes Ottoman. sent4: if the grease-gun does draw rhonchus then either the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman or it does draw rhonchus or both. sent5: if the network does not reflectorize network the gallery does not draw rhonchus and is non-developmental. sent6: if something is not a tuck it is not a orzo or reflectorizes Ottoman or both. sent7: the dronabinol does tuck and is not non-developmental. sent8: the ex-boyfriend is feudatory. sent9: the dronabinol is developmental. sent10: the positivist is not a bow if the ex-boyfriend is feudatory but it is not a bow. sent11: that something does draw fuzz and is not a ludo is wrong if it is not a bow. sent12: if the dronabinol does not reflectorize Ottoman the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman. sent13: if the Jungian is not cismontane the network is a pipet and catalectic. sent14: the fact that if the gallery does not draw rhonchus and it is not developmental the grease-gun is not a tuck is correct. sent15: if the fact that something is a orology and/or is not a kind of a war is false then it does not reflectorize network. sent16: the grease-gun either does not draw rhonchus or does tuck or both if the dronabinol does tuck. sent17: the ex-boyfriend does not bow. sent18: if the fact that the positivist does draw fuzz and is not a kind of a ludo is wrong then the Jungian is not cismontane. sent19: the dronabinol does reflectorize Ottoman and is developmental. sent20: the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman if the fact that the dronabinol is developmental and tucks does not hold. sent21: the seawater reflectorizes Ottoman if the grease-gun is a tuck.
sent7 -> int1: the dronabinol tucks.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: either the grease-gun does not draw rhonchus or it is a tuck or both.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman.
$hypothesis$ = the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something is a orology and/or not a war does not hold if it is catalectic. sent2: if the grease-gun either does not draw rhonchus or does tuck or both then the seawater does reflectorize Ottoman. sent3: if the fact that the seawater is not a tuck or is developmental or both hold the dronabinol reflectorizes Ottoman. sent4: if the grease-gun does draw rhonchus then either the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman or it does draw rhonchus or both. sent5: if the network does not reflectorize network the gallery does not draw rhonchus and is non-developmental. sent6: if something is not a tuck it is not a orzo or reflectorizes Ottoman or both. sent7: the dronabinol does tuck and is not non-developmental. sent8: the ex-boyfriend is feudatory. sent9: the dronabinol is developmental. sent10: the positivist is not a bow if the ex-boyfriend is feudatory but it is not a bow. sent11: that something does draw fuzz and is not a ludo is wrong if it is not a bow. sent12: if the dronabinol does not reflectorize Ottoman the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman. sent13: if the Jungian is not cismontane the network is a pipet and catalectic. sent14: the fact that if the gallery does not draw rhonchus and it is not developmental the grease-gun is not a tuck is correct. sent15: if the fact that something is a orology and/or is not a kind of a war is false then it does not reflectorize network. sent16: the grease-gun either does not draw rhonchus or does tuck or both if the dronabinol does tuck. sent17: the ex-boyfriend does not bow. sent18: if the fact that the positivist does draw fuzz and is not a kind of a ludo is wrong then the Jungian is not cismontane. sent19: the dronabinol does reflectorize Ottoman and is developmental. sent20: the seawater does not reflectorize Ottoman if the fact that the dronabinol is developmental and tucks does not hold. sent21: the seawater reflectorizes Ottoman if the grease-gun is a tuck. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the dronabinol tucks.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: either the grease-gun does not draw rhonchus or it is a tuck or both.; sent2 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__