the fact that the nosohusialness does not occur but the air-to-airness happens is true.
sent1: the sloganeering happens and the directedness happens. sent2: either the depressurizing segregator does not occur or the depressurizing Florentine occurs or both if the depressurizing Naseby does not occur. sent3: the air-to-airness occurs if the tracing does not occur. sent4: the nosohusialness does not occur if the cutback happens. sent5: if the unalikeness occurs the fact that the carrotiness occurs and the bloomer does not occur is not right. sent6: if the bloomer does not occur the dissembling occurs and the carrotiness occurs. sent7: the nosohusialness triggers that the tracing does not occur but the air-to-airness occurs. sent8: the fact that the paleontologicalness happens is correct if that the fact that the paleontologicalness does not occur and the dissembling does not occur is not false is not correct. sent9: the nosohusialness happens and the sloganeering happens if the cutback does not occur. sent10: if that the depressurizing Naseby does not occur is true then that both the non-nosohusialness and the air-to-airness happens is incorrect. sent11: the cutback occurs. sent12: the fact that the unalikeness occurs is true. sent13: if the depressurizing Naseby and the unpalatableness occurs the directedness does not occur. sent14: the fact that both the unpalatableness and the non-directedness happens is not correct if the refracting happens. sent15: the paleontologicalness yields that the cutback does not occur but the incurvating acknowledgment occurs. sent16: if the non-unpalatableness or the refracting or both happens then the tracing does not occur. sent17: the tasting does not occur. sent18: if the paleontologicalness occurs but the incurvating acknowledgment does not occur then the cutback does not occur. sent19: the ungenerousness does not occur and/or the chancrousness happens. sent20: the sloganeering occurs. sent21: the parasiticness does not occur. sent22: the fact that the paleontologicalness does not occur and the dissembling does not occur does not hold if that the carrotiness does not occur is right. sent23: the bloomer does not occur if the unalikeness does not occur but the paddle occurs. sent24: either the unpalatableness or the refracting or both happens. sent25: the depressurizing Naseby happens. sent26: that the paleontologicalness happens but the incurvating acknowledgment does not occur is triggered by that the dissembling happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unpalatableness happens.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the depressurizing Naseby and the unpalatableness happens hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the directing does not occur.; sent1 -> int3: the directedness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the unpalatableness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: either the palatableness or the refracting or both happens.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the tracing does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the air-to-airness happens.; sent4 & sent11 -> int9: the nosohusialness does not occur.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
either the depressurizing segregator does not occur or the depressurizing Florentine happens or both.
sent5 & sent12 -> int10: that the carrotiness but not the bloomer occurs does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the nosohusialness does not occur but the air-to-airness happens is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the sloganeering happens and the directedness happens. sent2: either the depressurizing segregator does not occur or the depressurizing Florentine occurs or both if the depressurizing Naseby does not occur. sent3: the air-to-airness occurs if the tracing does not occur. sent4: the nosohusialness does not occur if the cutback happens. sent5: if the unalikeness occurs the fact that the carrotiness occurs and the bloomer does not occur is not right. sent6: if the bloomer does not occur the dissembling occurs and the carrotiness occurs. sent7: the nosohusialness triggers that the tracing does not occur but the air-to-airness occurs. sent8: the fact that the paleontologicalness happens is correct if that the fact that the paleontologicalness does not occur and the dissembling does not occur is not false is not correct. sent9: the nosohusialness happens and the sloganeering happens if the cutback does not occur. sent10: if that the depressurizing Naseby does not occur is true then that both the non-nosohusialness and the air-to-airness happens is incorrect. sent11: the cutback occurs. sent12: the fact that the unalikeness occurs is true. sent13: if the depressurizing Naseby and the unpalatableness occurs the directedness does not occur. sent14: the fact that both the unpalatableness and the non-directedness happens is not correct if the refracting happens. sent15: the paleontologicalness yields that the cutback does not occur but the incurvating acknowledgment occurs. sent16: if the non-unpalatableness or the refracting or both happens then the tracing does not occur. sent17: the tasting does not occur. sent18: if the paleontologicalness occurs but the incurvating acknowledgment does not occur then the cutback does not occur. sent19: the ungenerousness does not occur and/or the chancrousness happens. sent20: the sloganeering occurs. sent21: the parasiticness does not occur. sent22: the fact that the paleontologicalness does not occur and the dissembling does not occur does not hold if that the carrotiness does not occur is right. sent23: the bloomer does not occur if the unalikeness does not occur but the paddle occurs. sent24: either the unpalatableness or the refracting or both happens. sent25: the depressurizing Naseby happens. sent26: that the paleontologicalness happens but the incurvating acknowledgment does not occur is triggered by that the dissembling happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unpalatableness happens.; sent25 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the depressurizing Naseby and the unpalatableness happens hold.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the directing does not occur.; sent1 -> int3: the directedness happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the unpalatableness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: either the palatableness or the refracting or both happens.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the tracing does not occur.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the air-to-airness happens.; sent4 & sent11 -> int9: the nosohusialness does not occur.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__