the Merovingian is agreeable but it does not bush.
sent1: that the Merovingian is a kind of a weaponry but it does not metabolize placidity is not true if there is something such that the fact that it is a Jayshullah is correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Jayshullah is correct. sent3: if the fact that something is not a weaponry and it does not metabolize placidity is not right then it is agreeable. sent4: if that something studies virulence and it is a bushing is not correct then it is not a bushing. sent5: something is agreeable if it is a weaponry. sent6: that the Merovingian is a weaponry and does not metabolize placidity is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the Merovingian is not a weaponry and it does not metabolize placidity is false if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Jayshullah hold. sent8: the lees is a kind of a bushing if it is a Jayshullah.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: that the Merovingian is not a weaponry and does not metabolize placidity is wrong.; sent3 -> int2: if that the Merovingian is not a kind of a weaponry and it does not metabolize placidity is incorrect it is agreeable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Merovingian is agreeable.; sent4 -> int4: the Merovingian is not a kind of a bushing if that it studies virulence and is a bushing is not right.;
the fact that the Merovingian is agreeable but it is not a bushing is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the Merovingian is agreeable but it does not bush. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Merovingian is a kind of a weaponry but it does not metabolize placidity is not true if there is something such that the fact that it is a Jayshullah is correct. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is a Jayshullah is correct. sent3: if the fact that something is not a weaponry and it does not metabolize placidity is not right then it is agreeable. sent4: if that something studies virulence and it is a bushing is not correct then it is not a bushing. sent5: something is agreeable if it is a weaponry. sent6: that the Merovingian is a weaponry and does not metabolize placidity is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the Merovingian is not a weaponry and it does not metabolize placidity is false if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Jayshullah hold. sent8: the lees is a kind of a bushing if it is a Jayshullah. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: that the Merovingian is not a weaponry and does not metabolize placidity is wrong.; sent3 -> int2: if that the Merovingian is not a kind of a weaponry and it does not metabolize placidity is incorrect it is agreeable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Merovingian is agreeable.; sent4 -> int4: the Merovingian is not a kind of a bushing if that it studies virulence and is a bushing is not right.; __UNKNOWN__