the buntal either does acquaint buntal or does outlive or both.
sent1: the diamante does not acquaint erectness and/or it is a kind of a X-ray. sent2: the diamante is a kind of a bacteriophage if the intruder is a kind of a folk. sent3: the hysterosalpingogram is not non-later. sent4: if the diamante is a bacteriophage the buntal acquaints buntal. sent5: that either something does acquaint buntal or it does outlive or both is wrong if it is not a vacation. sent6: if the diamante does not acquaint erectness and/or it is a X-ray it does not acquaint erectness. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does not patrol bast or is a kind of a puku or both does not hold then the intruder is a bacteriophage. sent8: the intruder is a folk if there exists something such that the fact that it is a vacation and not later does not hold. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of later thing that acquaints buntal is wrong. sent10: if the diamante does not acquaint erectness the fact that it does not patrol bast and/or it is a puku is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hysterosalpingogram vacations but it is not later.; assump1 -> int1: the hysterosalpingogram is not later.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hysterosalpingogram is a vacation that is not later does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a vacation and is not later is not correct.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the intruder is a kind of a folk hold.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the diamante is a bacteriophage.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the buntal acquaints buntal.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the buntal does acquaint buntal or outlives or both is not right is right.
sent5 -> int8: if the buntal is not a kind of a vacation that it does acquaint buntal or does outlive or both is not true.; sent6 & sent1 -> int9: the diamante does not acquaint erectness.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: that the diamante does not patrol bast and/or is a puku does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that the fact that either it does not patrol bast or it is a kind of a puku or both is false.; int11 & sent7 -> int12: the intruder is a kind of a bacteriophage.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is a bacteriophage.;
$hypothesis$ = the buntal either does acquaint buntal or does outlive or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the diamante does not acquaint erectness and/or it is a kind of a X-ray. sent2: the diamante is a kind of a bacteriophage if the intruder is a kind of a folk. sent3: the hysterosalpingogram is not non-later. sent4: if the diamante is a bacteriophage the buntal acquaints buntal. sent5: that either something does acquaint buntal or it does outlive or both is wrong if it is not a vacation. sent6: if the diamante does not acquaint erectness and/or it is a X-ray it does not acquaint erectness. sent7: if there exists something such that that it does not patrol bast or is a kind of a puku or both does not hold then the intruder is a bacteriophage. sent8: the intruder is a folk if there exists something such that the fact that it is a vacation and not later does not hold. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of later thing that acquaints buntal is wrong. sent10: if the diamante does not acquaint erectness the fact that it does not patrol bast and/or it is a puku is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hysterosalpingogram vacations but it is not later.; assump1 -> int1: the hysterosalpingogram is not later.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the hysterosalpingogram is a vacation that is not later does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that the fact that it is a vacation and is not later is not correct.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: that the intruder is a kind of a folk hold.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the diamante is a bacteriophage.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the buntal acquaints buntal.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__