the fact that the thinkableness occurs but the blizzard does not occur is not correct.
sent1: if the disappearance does not occur then that both the defraying luge and the unthinkableness happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that the recruitment happens but the salving viatication does not occur is not correct. sent3: the unfitness happens. sent4: the disappearance happens if the fact that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication does not occur is incorrect. sent5: that the thinkableness happens and the blizzard happens does not hold. sent6: the spiraling does not occur if the unfitness occurs. sent7: if that the defraying luge does not occur is true then that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the cracking does not occur that the thinkableness and the blizzard happens is false. sent9: that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication occurs is false if the defraying luge does not occur. sent10: the non-metaphysicalness is brought about by that the disappearance occurs and the cracking happens. sent11: if the defraying luge does not occur that the recruitment but not the salving viatication occurs does not hold. sent12: if the defraying luge happens that the catarrhine occurs but the earful does not occur is incorrect. sent13: the umbilicalness happens if the spiral does not occur. sent14: that that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication happens is incorrect is correct. sent15: that the spiral does not occur causes that the umbilicalness occurs and the metaphysicalness happens. sent16: the umbilical does not occur if the fact that the Babylonian and the unfrozenness occurs is wrong. sent17: if that the umbilicalness does not occur hold that the metaphysicalness occurs and the cracking does not occur is wrong. sent18: the fact that the thinkableness but not the blizzard happens is wrong if the cracking does not occur. sent19: the umbilical happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cracking occurs.; sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the spiraling does not occur.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the umbilical and the metaphysicalness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the metaphysicalness happens.;
the thinkableness occurs but the blizzard does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the thinkableness occurs but the blizzard does not occur is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the disappearance does not occur then that both the defraying luge and the unthinkableness happens does not hold. sent2: the fact that the recruitment happens but the salving viatication does not occur is not correct. sent3: the unfitness happens. sent4: the disappearance happens if the fact that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication does not occur is incorrect. sent5: that the thinkableness happens and the blizzard happens does not hold. sent6: the spiraling does not occur if the unfitness occurs. sent7: if that the defraying luge does not occur is true then that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication does not occur does not hold. sent8: if the cracking does not occur that the thinkableness and the blizzard happens is false. sent9: that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication occurs is false if the defraying luge does not occur. sent10: the non-metaphysicalness is brought about by that the disappearance occurs and the cracking happens. sent11: if the defraying luge does not occur that the recruitment but not the salving viatication occurs does not hold. sent12: if the defraying luge happens that the catarrhine occurs but the earful does not occur is incorrect. sent13: the umbilicalness happens if the spiral does not occur. sent14: that that the recruitment does not occur and the salving viatication happens is incorrect is correct. sent15: that the spiral does not occur causes that the umbilicalness occurs and the metaphysicalness happens. sent16: the umbilical does not occur if the fact that the Babylonian and the unfrozenness occurs is wrong. sent17: if that the umbilicalness does not occur hold that the metaphysicalness occurs and the cracking does not occur is wrong. sent18: the fact that the thinkableness but not the blizzard happens is wrong if the cracking does not occur. sent19: the umbilical happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the cracking occurs.; sent6 & sent3 -> int1: the spiraling does not occur.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the umbilical and the metaphysicalness occurs.; int2 -> int3: the metaphysicalness happens.; __UNKNOWN__