the gametophyte does not syllogize sanctification.
sent1: the terrier is not a dalliance. sent2: if the fact that the terrier does not syllogize sanctification and does not idealize is false then the gametophyte does not syllogize sanctification. sent3: the fact that the typist is not lexicographic or is not a dalliance or both is false if that it is not a jurist hold. sent4: the terrier is a Klansman. sent5: if something is not astronautic and/or does articulate hermaphroditism it does not syllogize sanctification. sent6: the gametophyte is a broadax. sent7: the gametophyte does idealize if a non-maxillary thing is a Klansman. sent8: if there is something such that that either it is not lexicographic or it is not a dalliance or both is not true the consort does not articulate hermaphroditism. sent9: if the grunter is a kind of a Klansman then the terrier is a Klansman. sent10: if the grunter is a Klansman the terrier is not maxillary but it is a Klansman. sent11: the fact that the terrier does not idealize and is not a Klansman is not right if it does not syllogize sanctification. sent12: everything is a Klansman. sent13: the gametophyte does syllogize sanctification if it does idealize. sent14: the typist is not a kind of a jurist. sent15: if the sunporch is astronautic the terrier is a kind of a Klansman but it is non-maxillary. sent16: there is something such that it is not a kind of a profit and is a kind of a chiaroscuro. sent17: something that is not a dalliance is non-astronautic and is lexicographic.
sent12 -> int1: that the grunter is a Klansman is not false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the terrier is a kind of non-maxillary thing that is a kind of a Klansman.; int2 -> int3: something is not maxillary but it is a Klansman.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the gametophyte does idealize.; int4 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the dairy is maxillary.
sent5 -> int5: that if the terrier is not astronautic and/or it does articulate hermaphroditism the terrier does not syllogize sanctification hold.; sent17 -> int6: the terrier is both not astronautic and lexicographic if it is not a dalliance.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the terrier is not astronautic but it is lexicographic.; int7 -> int8: the terrier is not astronautic.; int8 -> int9: the terrier is not astronautic or it articulates hermaphroditism or both.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the terrier does not syllogize sanctification is not wrong.; sent11 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the terrier does not idealize and it is not a Klansman is incorrect.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it does not idealize and is not a kind of a Klansman is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the gametophyte does not syllogize sanctification. ; $context$ = sent1: the terrier is not a dalliance. sent2: if the fact that the terrier does not syllogize sanctification and does not idealize is false then the gametophyte does not syllogize sanctification. sent3: the fact that the typist is not lexicographic or is not a dalliance or both is false if that it is not a jurist hold. sent4: the terrier is a Klansman. sent5: if something is not astronautic and/or does articulate hermaphroditism it does not syllogize sanctification. sent6: the gametophyte is a broadax. sent7: the gametophyte does idealize if a non-maxillary thing is a Klansman. sent8: if there is something such that that either it is not lexicographic or it is not a dalliance or both is not true the consort does not articulate hermaphroditism. sent9: if the grunter is a kind of a Klansman then the terrier is a Klansman. sent10: if the grunter is a Klansman the terrier is not maxillary but it is a Klansman. sent11: the fact that the terrier does not idealize and is not a Klansman is not right if it does not syllogize sanctification. sent12: everything is a Klansman. sent13: the gametophyte does syllogize sanctification if it does idealize. sent14: the typist is not a kind of a jurist. sent15: if the sunporch is astronautic the terrier is a kind of a Klansman but it is non-maxillary. sent16: there is something such that it is not a kind of a profit and is a kind of a chiaroscuro. sent17: something that is not a dalliance is non-astronautic and is lexicographic. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: that the grunter is a Klansman is not false.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the terrier is a kind of non-maxillary thing that is a kind of a Klansman.; int2 -> int3: something is not maxillary but it is a Klansman.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the gametophyte does idealize.; int4 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__