either the angel is thermodynamics or it is backward or both.
sent1: the fact that the detractor is independent but not operable is incorrect if it does not bog twinjet. sent2: something that is not inoperable is up and totemic. sent3: the refinisher is a boondoggle and is not exploratory. sent4: if the teliospore is not a bombast then that the angel is thermodynamics or it is backward or both does not hold. sent5: if the opportunist bogs twinjet the detractor does not bogs twinjet. sent6: there exists something such that it does not gentle. sent7: there is something such that it is non-backward and not a bombast. sent8: a photography is a kind of a Danube. sent9: if that something is both not woody and a photography does not hold then that it is woody is right. sent10: the fact that the teliospore is thermodynamics or a bombast or both is true. sent11: something winnows soldier if it is a boondoggle and it is not exploratory. sent12: if the refinisher winnows soldier then it is not a Durban. sent13: if a non-questionable thing does not winnow Sheffield the fact that the teliospore is a kind of a bombast hold. sent14: the soldier is not inoperable if there exists something such that that it is independent and it is inoperable is incorrect. sent15: the fact that something is a photography is true if that it is a bombast is true. sent16: the opportunist bogs twinjet. sent17: the shit is not a bombast if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a cittern but a bombast is not false does not hold. sent18: the soundboard is a kind of unquestionable thing that does not winnow Sheffield. sent19: if the refinisher is not a kind of a Durban then the fact that the kirpan is not a kind of a cittern but it is a bombast is incorrect. sent20: if the shit is both not a bombast and a Danube then the teliospore is not a bombast. sent21: that the soundboard is not questionable is not wrong. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a photography and/or is a Danube the angel is backward.
sent18 -> int1: something is not questionable and it does not winnow Sheffield.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the teliospore is a bombast.; sent15 -> int3: the teliospore is a kind of a photography if it is a bombast.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the teliospore is a kind of a photography hold.; int4 -> int5: the teliospore is a photography or it is a kind of a Danube or both.; int5 -> int6: either something is a photography or it is a kind of a Danube or both.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the angel is backward.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the soundboard is woody.
sent9 -> int8: if that the soundboard is both not woody and a photography does not hold then it is woody.;
$hypothesis$ = either the angel is thermodynamics or it is backward or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the detractor is independent but not operable is incorrect if it does not bog twinjet. sent2: something that is not inoperable is up and totemic. sent3: the refinisher is a boondoggle and is not exploratory. sent4: if the teliospore is not a bombast then that the angel is thermodynamics or it is backward or both does not hold. sent5: if the opportunist bogs twinjet the detractor does not bogs twinjet. sent6: there exists something such that it does not gentle. sent7: there is something such that it is non-backward and not a bombast. sent8: a photography is a kind of a Danube. sent9: if that something is both not woody and a photography does not hold then that it is woody is right. sent10: the fact that the teliospore is thermodynamics or a bombast or both is true. sent11: something winnows soldier if it is a boondoggle and it is not exploratory. sent12: if the refinisher winnows soldier then it is not a Durban. sent13: if a non-questionable thing does not winnow Sheffield the fact that the teliospore is a kind of a bombast hold. sent14: the soldier is not inoperable if there exists something such that that it is independent and it is inoperable is incorrect. sent15: the fact that something is a photography is true if that it is a bombast is true. sent16: the opportunist bogs twinjet. sent17: the shit is not a bombast if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is not a cittern but a bombast is not false does not hold. sent18: the soundboard is a kind of unquestionable thing that does not winnow Sheffield. sent19: if the refinisher is not a kind of a Durban then the fact that the kirpan is not a kind of a cittern but it is a bombast is incorrect. sent20: if the shit is both not a bombast and a Danube then the teliospore is not a bombast. sent21: that the soundboard is not questionable is not wrong. sent22: if there exists something such that it is a photography and/or is a Danube the angel is backward. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 -> int1: something is not questionable and it does not winnow Sheffield.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the teliospore is a bombast.; sent15 -> int3: the teliospore is a kind of a photography if it is a bombast.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the teliospore is a kind of a photography hold.; int4 -> int5: the teliospore is a photography or it is a kind of a Danube or both.; int5 -> int6: either something is a photography or it is a kind of a Danube or both.; int6 & sent22 -> int7: the angel is backward.; int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__