the fact that the spiv does not descry cylinder and does not yield Rundstedt does not hold.
sent1: the test is indistinguishable and it yields subservience. sent2: if the test yields bristle the repercussion is not calciferous and yields bristle. sent3: if the test is not insecticidal then that the spiv is not insecticidal is correct. sent4: that the sampler is a vulgarization and a catalectic is not correct. sent5: that that the spiv does not descry cylinder and it does not yield Rundstedt hold is not correct if the bristle is not non-insecticidal. sent6: the spiv does lease if the snow-in-summer does not descry cylinder but it is a kind of a Tractarianism. sent7: if that something is indistinguishable but it is not a Tractarianism hold then it is not a kind of a lease. sent8: the fact that that the spiv does not descry cylinder but it yields Rundstedt is true is not true. sent9: if the snow-in-summer is not a lease then the test is a lease. sent10: if something is indistinguishable it does not descry cylinder and it does not yield Rundstedt. sent11: the snow-in-summer is not a pile and/or it does not lease if it is not a vulgarization. sent12: if that the spiv leases and/or it is not a Tractarianism is false then it yields subservience. sent13: if something does not yield bristle and is calciferous then it is not a kind of a lease. sent14: the fact that the fact that the sampler is a kind of a vulgarization and is not a kind of a catalectic is incorrect is true. sent15: that the spiv descries cylinder but it does not yield Rundstedt is not true. sent16: if the bristle is insecticidal the fact that the spiv does not descry cylinder but it does yield Rundstedt does not hold. sent17: something does yield bristle if it is a Tractarianism. sent18: the fact that the bristle is insecticidal is correct if the repercussion is not calciferous and yields bristle. sent19: something is not a kind of a Tractarianism if it is not a lease. sent20: if the test does yield bristle then the repercussion is not calciferous. sent21: something is indistinguishable if the fact that it yields subservience is not incorrect. sent22: if the snow-in-summer is not a pile then the test leases. sent23: something does not yield bristle and is calciferous if it is not insecticidal.
sent1 -> int1: the test is indistinguishable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the test is not a Tractarianism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the test is a kind of indistinguishable thing that is not a Tractarianism.; sent7 -> int3: the test is not a lease if it is indistinguishable and is not a Tractarianism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the test is not a kind of a lease.; sent17 -> int5: the test yields bristle if it is a kind of a Tractarianism.;
the spiv does not descry cylinder and it does not yield Rundstedt.
sent10 -> int6: the spiv does not descry cylinder and does not yield Rundstedt if it is indistinguishable.; sent19 -> int7: the spiv is not a Tractarianism if the fact that it is not a kind of a lease hold.; sent13 -> int8: if the spiv does not yield bristle and is calciferous it is not a kind of a lease.; sent23 -> int9: if that the spiv is not insecticidal is not incorrect it does not yield bristle and it is calciferous.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the spiv does not descry cylinder and does not yield Rundstedt does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the test is indistinguishable and it yields subservience. sent2: if the test yields bristle the repercussion is not calciferous and yields bristle. sent3: if the test is not insecticidal then that the spiv is not insecticidal is correct. sent4: that the sampler is a vulgarization and a catalectic is not correct. sent5: that that the spiv does not descry cylinder and it does not yield Rundstedt hold is not correct if the bristle is not non-insecticidal. sent6: the spiv does lease if the snow-in-summer does not descry cylinder but it is a kind of a Tractarianism. sent7: if that something is indistinguishable but it is not a Tractarianism hold then it is not a kind of a lease. sent8: the fact that that the spiv does not descry cylinder but it yields Rundstedt is true is not true. sent9: if the snow-in-summer is not a lease then the test is a lease. sent10: if something is indistinguishable it does not descry cylinder and it does not yield Rundstedt. sent11: the snow-in-summer is not a pile and/or it does not lease if it is not a vulgarization. sent12: if that the spiv leases and/or it is not a Tractarianism is false then it yields subservience. sent13: if something does not yield bristle and is calciferous then it is not a kind of a lease. sent14: the fact that the fact that the sampler is a kind of a vulgarization and is not a kind of a catalectic is incorrect is true. sent15: that the spiv descries cylinder but it does not yield Rundstedt is not true. sent16: if the bristle is insecticidal the fact that the spiv does not descry cylinder but it does yield Rundstedt does not hold. sent17: something does yield bristle if it is a Tractarianism. sent18: the fact that the bristle is insecticidal is correct if the repercussion is not calciferous and yields bristle. sent19: something is not a kind of a Tractarianism if it is not a lease. sent20: if the test does yield bristle then the repercussion is not calciferous. sent21: something is indistinguishable if the fact that it yields subservience is not incorrect. sent22: if the snow-in-summer is not a pile then the test leases. sent23: something does not yield bristle and is calciferous if it is not insecticidal. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the test is indistinguishable.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the test is not a Tractarianism.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the test is a kind of indistinguishable thing that is not a Tractarianism.; sent7 -> int3: the test is not a lease if it is indistinguishable and is not a Tractarianism.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the test is not a kind of a lease.; sent17 -> int5: the test yields bristle if it is a kind of a Tractarianism.; __UNKNOWN__