something is not a peak but it is a Macoun.
sent1: the fact that something does not underwrite is right. sent2: if the desalination is a Podilymbus the fact that the tachistoscope does not mesh Jacobite or it does not monetize Owen or both does not hold. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Macoun but it does peak then it does not mesh atrazine. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does not mesh Jacobite or it does not monetize Owen or both does not hold then the generic does not mesh atrazine. sent5: there exists something such that it is not non-uncial. sent6: the generic does mesh atrazine. sent7: something is a overcredulity and it is a Podilymbus if it does not mesh atrazine. sent8: everything is a Dumas. sent9: something is not a Macoun and does mesh atrazine. sent10: The atrazine does mesh generic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the desalination is a Podilymbus.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the tachistoscope either does not mesh Jacobite or does not monetize Owen or both does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not mesh Jacobite and/or it does not monetize Owen is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the generic does not mesh atrazine.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the desalination is not a Podilymbus.;
the tachistoscope is a overcredulity.
sent3 -> int6: if the desalination is both not a Macoun and a peak then that it does not mesh atrazine is right.; sent8 -> int7: the desalination is a Dumas.; sent7 -> int8: if that the desalination does not mesh atrazine is correct then it is a overcredulity and is a Podilymbus.;
$hypothesis$ = something is not a peak but it is a Macoun. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not underwrite is right. sent2: if the desalination is a Podilymbus the fact that the tachistoscope does not mesh Jacobite or it does not monetize Owen or both does not hold. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Macoun but it does peak then it does not mesh atrazine. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it does not mesh Jacobite or it does not monetize Owen or both does not hold then the generic does not mesh atrazine. sent5: there exists something such that it is not non-uncial. sent6: the generic does mesh atrazine. sent7: something is a overcredulity and it is a Podilymbus if it does not mesh atrazine. sent8: everything is a Dumas. sent9: something is not a Macoun and does mesh atrazine. sent10: The atrazine does mesh generic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the desalination is a Podilymbus.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the tachistoscope either does not mesh Jacobite or does not monetize Owen or both does not hold.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that that it does not mesh Jacobite and/or it does not monetize Owen is false.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the generic does not mesh atrazine.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the desalination is not a Podilymbus.; __UNKNOWN__