the blackberry is both not a acervulus and hematologic.
sent1: the blackberry is inadequate if there is something such that the fact that it is not inadequate but a RIRA is wrong. sent2: the blackberry is not a acervulus. sent3: there is something such that that it is inadequate and it is a kind of a RIRA does not hold. sent4: something that is morphologic is inadequate. sent5: if something is inadequate then it is not a kind of a acervulus. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-penicillin-resistant thing that is a deoxyadenosine is not true. sent7: a iambic thing is unreverberant thing that is a kind of a RIRA. sent8: the mummification does not strengthen fearfulness but it is a fairness if it is inadequate. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is inadequate hold then that the blackberry is inadequate is correct. sent10: the blackberry is not a kind of a acervulus but it consternates Chancellorsville. sent11: if the Park is inadequate that the blackberry is not a kind of a acervulus and is hematologic is wrong. sent12: the chasuble is not a RIRA if that the justiciar is a kind of a RIRA that is not iambic is not correct. sent13: if there are inadequate things that the Park is both not a hemin and a funk is wrong. sent14: a refit is not live and is clonic. sent15: something is adequate a RIRA. sent16: the Park is morphologic if the cerecloth is morphologic. sent17: something is not a acervulus and not non-hematologic if it is inadequate. sent18: the salt is not a steelmaker but it is a purr if it consternates blotched. sent19: the blackberry is not a acervulus if it is inadequate. sent20: there is something such that the fact that that it is not inadequate and is a RIRA is not false is incorrect. sent21: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a curfew and it is a kind of a overstrain is false. sent22: the blackberry does not consternate maleberry and is epicarpal.
sent17 -> int1: if the blackberry is inadequate it is both not a acervulus and hematologic.; sent20 & sent1 -> int2: the blackberry is inadequate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that the blackberry is not a acervulus but it is hematologic is not right is not incorrect.
sent4 -> int3: the Park is inadequate if it is morphologic.; sent7 -> int4: if that the chasuble is a kind of a iambic is not incorrect then it is not reverberant and it is a RIRA.;
$hypothesis$ = the blackberry is both not a acervulus and hematologic. ; $context$ = sent1: the blackberry is inadequate if there is something such that the fact that it is not inadequate but a RIRA is wrong. sent2: the blackberry is not a acervulus. sent3: there is something such that that it is inadequate and it is a kind of a RIRA does not hold. sent4: something that is morphologic is inadequate. sent5: if something is inadequate then it is not a kind of a acervulus. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of non-penicillin-resistant thing that is a deoxyadenosine is not true. sent7: a iambic thing is unreverberant thing that is a kind of a RIRA. sent8: the mummification does not strengthen fearfulness but it is a fairness if it is inadequate. sent9: if there exists something such that the fact that it is inadequate hold then that the blackberry is inadequate is correct. sent10: the blackberry is not a kind of a acervulus but it consternates Chancellorsville. sent11: if the Park is inadequate that the blackberry is not a kind of a acervulus and is hematologic is wrong. sent12: the chasuble is not a RIRA if that the justiciar is a kind of a RIRA that is not iambic is not correct. sent13: if there are inadequate things that the Park is both not a hemin and a funk is wrong. sent14: a refit is not live and is clonic. sent15: something is adequate a RIRA. sent16: the Park is morphologic if the cerecloth is morphologic. sent17: something is not a acervulus and not non-hematologic if it is inadequate. sent18: the salt is not a steelmaker but it is a purr if it consternates blotched. sent19: the blackberry is not a acervulus if it is inadequate. sent20: there is something such that the fact that that it is not inadequate and is a RIRA is not false is incorrect. sent21: there is something such that that it is not a kind of a curfew and it is a kind of a overstrain is false. sent22: the blackberry does not consternate maleberry and is epicarpal. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: if the blackberry is inadequate it is both not a acervulus and hematologic.; sent20 & sent1 -> int2: the blackberry is inadequate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__