that the insatiateness does not occur if the Andorran occurs is incorrect.
sent1: that the shimmering does not occur and the insatiateness happens prevents the barrel. sent2: both the west and the coaching Crotaphytus happens. sent3: the coaching Crotaphytus occurs. sent4: the insatiateness does not occur if the fact that not the barreling but the shimmering happens is false. sent5: that the reading fueling and the westness happens triggers the non-fissionableness. sent6: if the fissionableness does not occur that not the barrel but the shimmering occurs does not hold. sent7: the book occurs. sent8: the insatiateness happens if that the barreling does not occur and the shimmering happens is wrong. sent9: if the fissionableness does not occur that the barreling and the shimmer happens is false. sent10: that the corkscrewing acidophil occurs is caused by that the pontificating happens. sent11: if the barreling occurs then the insatiateness does not occur. sent12: the insolubleness happens. sent13: that the reading fueling occurs is triggered by that the Andorran occurs. sent14: the fact that that the barreling happens and the shimmering happens is incorrect is true. sent15: if that the Andorranness happens hold the fact that the insatiateness occurs is not wrong. sent16: the insatiateness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Andorranness occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the reading fueling happens.; sent2 -> int2: the west happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reading fueling occurs and the westness occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the fissionableness does not occur is correct.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the barreling does not occur but the shimmering happens does not hold.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the insatiateness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the widening occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that the insatiateness does not occur if the Andorran occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the shimmering does not occur and the insatiateness happens prevents the barrel. sent2: both the west and the coaching Crotaphytus happens. sent3: the coaching Crotaphytus occurs. sent4: the insatiateness does not occur if the fact that not the barreling but the shimmering happens is false. sent5: that the reading fueling and the westness happens triggers the non-fissionableness. sent6: if the fissionableness does not occur that not the barrel but the shimmering occurs does not hold. sent7: the book occurs. sent8: the insatiateness happens if that the barreling does not occur and the shimmering happens is wrong. sent9: if the fissionableness does not occur that the barreling and the shimmer happens is false. sent10: that the corkscrewing acidophil occurs is caused by that the pontificating happens. sent11: if the barreling occurs then the insatiateness does not occur. sent12: the insolubleness happens. sent13: that the reading fueling occurs is triggered by that the Andorran occurs. sent14: the fact that that the barreling happens and the shimmering happens is incorrect is true. sent15: if that the Andorranness happens hold the fact that the insatiateness occurs is not wrong. sent16: the insatiateness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Andorranness occurs.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the reading fueling happens.; sent2 -> int2: the west happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the reading fueling occurs and the westness occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the fissionableness does not occur is correct.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: that the barreling does not occur but the shimmering happens does not hold.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the insatiateness does not occur.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__