the Clorox is a kind of an apricot.
sent1: the fact that something does not perplex favored is not wrong if it is both an apricot and unexpansive. sent2: if the Clorox is a Wagnerian it stigmatizes temporalty. sent3: the Clorox is unexpansive. sent4: the thenar is not loud if the polychaete is a visor and does derail Titian. sent5: the polychaete is a visor that does not derail Titian. sent6: the polychaete is loud. sent7: the thenar is not loud if the polychaete is a kind of a visor that does not derail Titian. sent8: if the thenar does not perplex favored the Clorox is unexpansive an apricot. sent9: if the Clorox does not perplex favored the fact that it is a Wagnerian is not wrong. sent10: the polychaete is loud if the thenar derails Titian. sent11: the thenar is not non-loud if the Clorox does stigmatize temporalty. sent12: the polychaete does not derail Titian.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Clorox is an apricot.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the Clorox is a kind of an apricot and it is unexpansive.; sent1 -> int2: the Clorox does not perplex favored if the fact that it is an apricot and it is unexpansive hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Clorox does not perplex favored.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the Clorox is a Wagnerian.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the Clorox stigmatizes temporalty.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the thenar is loud.; sent7 & sent5 -> int7: the thenar is not loud.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the Clorox is a kind of an apricot.
$hypothesis$ = the Clorox is a kind of an apricot. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that something does not perplex favored is not wrong if it is both an apricot and unexpansive. sent2: if the Clorox is a Wagnerian it stigmatizes temporalty. sent3: the Clorox is unexpansive. sent4: the thenar is not loud if the polychaete is a visor and does derail Titian. sent5: the polychaete is a visor that does not derail Titian. sent6: the polychaete is loud. sent7: the thenar is not loud if the polychaete is a kind of a visor that does not derail Titian. sent8: if the thenar does not perplex favored the Clorox is unexpansive an apricot. sent9: if the Clorox does not perplex favored the fact that it is a Wagnerian is not wrong. sent10: the polychaete is loud if the thenar derails Titian. sent11: the thenar is not non-loud if the Clorox does stigmatize temporalty. sent12: the polychaete does not derail Titian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Clorox is an apricot.; assump1 & sent3 -> int1: the Clorox is a kind of an apricot and it is unexpansive.; sent1 -> int2: the Clorox does not perplex favored if the fact that it is an apricot and it is unexpansive hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Clorox does not perplex favored.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the Clorox is a Wagnerian.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the Clorox stigmatizes temporalty.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the thenar is loud.; sent7 & sent5 -> int7: the thenar is not loud.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__