the vetch is a kind of a Festuca and it is imperialistic.
sent1: something is not a stimulant but it advises if that it is not fibrinous hold. sent2: if that the MAT laves is right the vetch protests caravan. sent3: the vetch is imperialistic. sent4: the scoutmaster is not imperialistic if the fact that the Sabbatarian is imperialistic but it does attest is not correct. sent5: that the scoutmaster lashes is right if that it is not a lashes and it is a Festuca is false. sent6: if the scoutmaster is not imperialistic that it is not a kind of a lashing and it is a Festuca does not hold. sent7: the vetch is a Festuca if the fact that it lashes hold. sent8: if the vetch does protest caravan then it lashes. sent9: the fact that the caravan is not a stimulant and advises is not right. sent10: that something does not protest hollyhock but it does control if it is not fibrinous is correct. sent11: the fact that the fact that the caravan does lash and it does advise is not incorrect does not hold.
sent1 -> int1: the caravan is not a stimulant but it advises if it is not fibrinous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caravan is not fibrinous.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the caravan is not a stimulant and does advise.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the caravan is fibrinous.;
the MAT does not protest hollyhock but it is a controlled.
sent10 -> int5: the MAT does not protest hollyhock and does control if it is not fibrinous.;
$hypothesis$ = the vetch is a kind of a Festuca and it is imperialistic. ; $context$ = sent1: something is not a stimulant but it advises if that it is not fibrinous hold. sent2: if that the MAT laves is right the vetch protests caravan. sent3: the vetch is imperialistic. sent4: the scoutmaster is not imperialistic if the fact that the Sabbatarian is imperialistic but it does attest is not correct. sent5: that the scoutmaster lashes is right if that it is not a lashes and it is a Festuca is false. sent6: if the scoutmaster is not imperialistic that it is not a kind of a lashing and it is a Festuca does not hold. sent7: the vetch is a Festuca if the fact that it lashes hold. sent8: if the vetch does protest caravan then it lashes. sent9: the fact that the caravan is not a stimulant and advises is not right. sent10: that something does not protest hollyhock but it does control if it is not fibrinous is correct. sent11: the fact that the fact that the caravan does lash and it does advise is not incorrect does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: the caravan is not a stimulant but it advises if it is not fibrinous.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the caravan is not fibrinous.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the caravan is not a stimulant and does advise.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the caravan is fibrinous.; __UNKNOWN__