that if the cement slacks that the Elizabethan is not a kind of a horticulturist and is a Trinitarian does not hold is not incorrect.
sent1: if that something is prehistoric but it is not a kind of a trusty does not hold it does not slack. sent2: the Elizabethan is not a slack if it is not a Trinitarian and is prehistoric. sent3: if the cement is not a slack but it is prehistoric it is not a Trinitarian. sent4: the cement is both not a corner and prehistoric. sent5: the fact that the cement is aground and is not a horticulturist is false. sent6: if the Elizabethan is not a kind of a corner then the fact that the cement is prehistoric but it is not a trusty is not true. sent7: if something is not prehistoric then it is not a slack. sent8: the Elizabethan is not a trusty. sent9: if the fact that something is prehistoric thing that is not a trusty does not hold it is a slack. sent10: the Elizabethan does not slack if it is not a kind of a corner and is prehistoric. sent11: the Elizabethan is not a corner if it is not a kind of a horticulturist and it is a Trinitarian. sent12: the Elizabethan does not corner if it is a horticulturist and it is a Trinitarian. sent13: the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist but a Trinitarian if the cement is a kind of a slack. sent14: the fact that the Elizabethan is both a horticulturist and a Trinitarian does not hold. sent15: the fact that the beignet is a kind of non-ducal a retail is incorrect. sent16: the cement is not a slack if the fact that it is a kind of a horticulturist and it is not a Trinitarian is not right. sent17: the onion does not murmur Strigidae and does murmur mobcap if the Elizabethan is not prehistoric. sent18: that the Elizabethan is a horticulturist that is a Trinitarian is incorrect if the cement slacks. sent19: if the fact that the cement is both prehistoric and not a trusty is wrong it slacks. sent20: the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist. sent21: the cement is not a slack if the fact that it is not prehistoric is correct. sent22: the fact that the Elizabethan is a kind of a slack and is not a horticulturist does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist but it is a Trinitarian.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Elizabethan does not corner is not incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the cement is prehistoric and is not a trusty is wrong.; sent1 -> int3: if that the cement is both prehistoric and not a trusty does not hold it is not a slack.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cement does not slack.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cement is a kind of a slack.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist but a Trinitarian is false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the onion does not murmur Strigidae but it murmurs mobcap.
$hypothesis$ = that if the cement slacks that the Elizabethan is not a kind of a horticulturist and is a Trinitarian does not hold is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is prehistoric but it is not a kind of a trusty does not hold it does not slack. sent2: the Elizabethan is not a slack if it is not a Trinitarian and is prehistoric. sent3: if the cement is not a slack but it is prehistoric it is not a Trinitarian. sent4: the cement is both not a corner and prehistoric. sent5: the fact that the cement is aground and is not a horticulturist is false. sent6: if the Elizabethan is not a kind of a corner then the fact that the cement is prehistoric but it is not a trusty is not true. sent7: if something is not prehistoric then it is not a slack. sent8: the Elizabethan is not a trusty. sent9: if the fact that something is prehistoric thing that is not a trusty does not hold it is a slack. sent10: the Elizabethan does not slack if it is not a kind of a corner and is prehistoric. sent11: the Elizabethan is not a corner if it is not a kind of a horticulturist and it is a Trinitarian. sent12: the Elizabethan does not corner if it is a horticulturist and it is a Trinitarian. sent13: the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist but a Trinitarian if the cement is a kind of a slack. sent14: the fact that the Elizabethan is both a horticulturist and a Trinitarian does not hold. sent15: the fact that the beignet is a kind of non-ducal a retail is incorrect. sent16: the cement is not a slack if the fact that it is a kind of a horticulturist and it is not a Trinitarian is not right. sent17: the onion does not murmur Strigidae and does murmur mobcap if the Elizabethan is not prehistoric. sent18: that the Elizabethan is a horticulturist that is a Trinitarian is incorrect if the cement slacks. sent19: if the fact that the cement is both prehistoric and not a trusty is wrong it slacks. sent20: the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist. sent21: the cement is not a slack if the fact that it is not prehistoric is correct. sent22: the fact that the Elizabethan is a kind of a slack and is not a horticulturist does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist but it is a Trinitarian.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Elizabethan does not corner is not incorrect.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the cement is prehistoric and is not a trusty is wrong.; sent1 -> int3: if that the cement is both prehistoric and not a trusty does not hold it is not a slack.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the cement does not slack.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the cement is a kind of a slack.; int4 & assump2 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Elizabethan is not a horticulturist but a Trinitarian is false.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__