that the fracturing comforter occurs but the refacing Poterium does not occur is not correct if the ceramicsness does not occur.
sent1: if the fracturing comforter happens the nourishing occurs. sent2: that the ducalness happens and the gladiatorialness does not occur is false if the nourishing occurs. sent3: that the fracturing comforter and the refacing Poterium happens is not right if the ceramics does not occur. sent4: if the gladiatorialness occurs then the disharmonizing occurs. sent5: the fact that the disharmonizing occurs if that the ducalness occurs and the gladiatorialness does not occur is wrong hold. sent6: that the skewing does not occur is right if that the refacing Poterium does not occur and the fracturing comforter does not occur is not true. sent7: if the ceramics happens then the fact that the fracturing comforter occurs but the refacing Poterium does not occur is wrong. sent8: the fact that the refacing Poterium does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: if that the low-riseness and the non-Chadianness happens is false then the servicing Boswellia occurs. sent10: that both the fracturing comforter and the refacing Poterium happens does not hold. sent11: that the ceramics does not occur is prevented by the disharmonizing. sent12: the fracturing comforter but not the refacing Poterium occurs if the ceramics does not occur. sent13: if the nourishing happens then that the ducalness occurs and the gladiatorialness occurs is wrong. sent14: that both the ducalness and the gladiatorialness occurs is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fracturing comforter but not the refacing Poterium occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fracturing comforter happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the nourishing occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: that the ducalness but not the gladiatorialness occurs is not true.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the disharmonizing happens.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the ceramicsness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ceramicsness does not occur.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the fracturing comforter occurs but the refacing Poterium does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the skewing does not occur is not wrong.
$hypothesis$ = that the fracturing comforter occurs but the refacing Poterium does not occur is not correct if the ceramicsness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fracturing comforter happens the nourishing occurs. sent2: that the ducalness happens and the gladiatorialness does not occur is false if the nourishing occurs. sent3: that the fracturing comforter and the refacing Poterium happens is not right if the ceramics does not occur. sent4: if the gladiatorialness occurs then the disharmonizing occurs. sent5: the fact that the disharmonizing occurs if that the ducalness occurs and the gladiatorialness does not occur is wrong hold. sent6: that the skewing does not occur is right if that the refacing Poterium does not occur and the fracturing comforter does not occur is not true. sent7: if the ceramics happens then the fact that the fracturing comforter occurs but the refacing Poterium does not occur is wrong. sent8: the fact that the refacing Poterium does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: if that the low-riseness and the non-Chadianness happens is false then the servicing Boswellia occurs. sent10: that both the fracturing comforter and the refacing Poterium happens does not hold. sent11: that the ceramics does not occur is prevented by the disharmonizing. sent12: the fracturing comforter but not the refacing Poterium occurs if the ceramics does not occur. sent13: if the nourishing happens then that the ducalness occurs and the gladiatorialness occurs is wrong. sent14: that both the ducalness and the gladiatorialness occurs is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fracturing comforter but not the refacing Poterium occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the fracturing comforter happens.; sent1 & int1 -> int2: the nourishing occurs.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: that the ducalness but not the gladiatorialness occurs is not true.; sent5 & int3 -> int4: the disharmonizing happens.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the ceramicsness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the ceramicsness does not occur.; int5 & assump2 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: that the fracturing comforter occurs but the refacing Poterium does not occur does not hold.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__