the Monk is not a waterdog or it is broadband or both if the Postum is a sirdar.
sent1: the Postum is not responsive. sent2: the fact that either the Monk is responsive or it is a waterdog or both is right if the apoenzyme is not a kind of a pavement. sent3: the Postum is a waterdog if the Monk is broadband. sent4: the Monk is not a sirdar and/or it is a waterdog if the Postum is not inculpatory. sent5: the Postum is not a kind of a sirdar if it is not responsive and it is inculpatory. sent6: if the Postum is non-organismal a waterdog it is not responsive. sent7: if the agglutinin is not organismal then the Monk is not a waterdog and/or it is broadband. sent8: if that the agglutinin is organismal hold then the apoenzyme is a pavement. sent9: the Postum is organismal and/or it is responsive. sent10: if the apoenzyme is a kind of a pavement the Postum is inculpatory. sent11: if the Postum is a sirdar then the Monk either is a waterdog or is broadband or both. sent12: the Postum is a kind of a sirdar if it is not responsive and it is inculpatory. sent13: the Monk is organismal. sent14: the Monk is a bluestone. sent15: the Verdicchio is not broadband. sent16: either the Monk does water or it is broadband or both. sent17: the apoenzyme expires Phaethontidae. sent18: the apoenzyme is a waterdog. sent19: if something is organismal it does not expire antigram and/or it is cachectic. sent20: the agglutinin is not a sirdar. sent21: the Monk does water or it is responsive or both if the Postum is inculpatory. sent22: if the agglutinin is not organismal then the Monk waters or it is broadband or both.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the agglutinin is organismal.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the apoenzyme is a pavement.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the Postum is inculpatory.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Postum is a kind of non-responsive thing that is inculpatory.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the Postum is not a sirdar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Postum is a sirdar.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the agglutinin is not organismal.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Monk is either not a waterdog or broadband or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the Postum does not expire antigram and/or it is cachectic.
sent19 -> int8: if the Postum is organismal it either does not expire antigram or is cachectic or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the Monk is not a waterdog or it is broadband or both if the Postum is a sirdar. ; $context$ = sent1: the Postum is not responsive. sent2: the fact that either the Monk is responsive or it is a waterdog or both is right if the apoenzyme is not a kind of a pavement. sent3: the Postum is a waterdog if the Monk is broadband. sent4: the Monk is not a sirdar and/or it is a waterdog if the Postum is not inculpatory. sent5: the Postum is not a kind of a sirdar if it is not responsive and it is inculpatory. sent6: if the Postum is non-organismal a waterdog it is not responsive. sent7: if the agglutinin is not organismal then the Monk is not a waterdog and/or it is broadband. sent8: if that the agglutinin is organismal hold then the apoenzyme is a pavement. sent9: the Postum is organismal and/or it is responsive. sent10: if the apoenzyme is a kind of a pavement the Postum is inculpatory. sent11: if the Postum is a sirdar then the Monk either is a waterdog or is broadband or both. sent12: the Postum is a kind of a sirdar if it is not responsive and it is inculpatory. sent13: the Monk is organismal. sent14: the Monk is a bluestone. sent15: the Verdicchio is not broadband. sent16: either the Monk does water or it is broadband or both. sent17: the apoenzyme expires Phaethontidae. sent18: the apoenzyme is a waterdog. sent19: if something is organismal it does not expire antigram and/or it is cachectic. sent20: the agglutinin is not a sirdar. sent21: the Monk does water or it is responsive or both if the Postum is inculpatory. sent22: if the agglutinin is not organismal then the Monk waters or it is broadband or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the agglutinin is organismal.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the apoenzyme is a pavement.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the Postum is inculpatory.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the Postum is a kind of non-responsive thing that is inculpatory.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the Postum is not a sirdar.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Postum is a sirdar.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the agglutinin is not organismal.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Monk is either not a waterdog or broadband or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__