the pyrometer does sheathe sensitometer.
sent1: everything does not transfer swathe. sent2: the pangolin does sheathe vestiture if it is not leafless. sent3: if the smuggler does not sheathe sensitometer the pyrometer is sarcosomal and it does sheathe sensitometer. sent4: if the smuggler is not leafless the fact that the crampfish is a Ephesians is right. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is sarcosomal is right then the namby-pamby sheathes Bothidae and it does sheathe sensitometer. sent6: if something does not refer Hillel then the crampfish does not sheathe Bothidae and/or is not sarcosomal. sent7: there are leafy things. sent8: the smuggler does not refer Hillel. sent9: the crampfish does not sheathe Bothidae. sent10: if something that is not a Ephesians is a capsicum it is spiritualistic. sent11: the crampfish does refer Hillel. sent12: the fact that if the smuggler is spiritualistic and sheathes sensitometer the crampfish is not leafless is right. sent13: something is not leafless and is not spiritualistic if it is not sarcosomal. sent14: if the crampfish is a kind of non-leafless thing that is not spiritualistic the pyrometer does not sheathe sensitometer. sent15: that the synthetic is not sarcosomal is not wrong. sent16: the smuggler is not a Ephesians. sent17: if the smuggler does not sheathe sensitometer then the pyrometer is sarcosomal. sent18: that the crampfish is leafless and refers Hillel is not incorrect if it does not sheathe Bothidae. sent19: if something does not transfer swathe then that it counterweights Helodermatidae and refers Hillel is not correct. sent20: The Bothidae does not sheathe crampfish. sent21: the pyrometer is not spiritualistic.
sent10 -> int1: if the smuggler is not Ephesians but it is a capsicum it is spiritualistic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smuggler does sheathe sensitometer.; sent18 & sent9 -> int2: the crampfish is leafless and it does refer Hillel.; int2 -> int3: the crampfish is leafless.;
the pyrometer does not sheathe sensitometer.
sent13 -> int4: if that the crampfish is not sarcosomal is not wrong it is a kind of leafy thing that is not spiritualistic.; sent19 -> int5: if the lepidomelane does not transfer swathe then the fact that it does counterweight Helodermatidae and it does refer Hillel is not right.; sent1 -> int6: the lepidomelane does not transfer swathe.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the lepidomelane counterweights Helodermatidae and does refer Hillel is not true.; int7 -> int8: there exists nothing such that it does counterweight Helodermatidae and does refer Hillel.; int8 -> int9: that the paintbox does counterweight Helodermatidae and refers Hillel is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the pyrometer does sheathe sensitometer. ; $context$ = sent1: everything does not transfer swathe. sent2: the pangolin does sheathe vestiture if it is not leafless. sent3: if the smuggler does not sheathe sensitometer the pyrometer is sarcosomal and it does sheathe sensitometer. sent4: if the smuggler is not leafless the fact that the crampfish is a Ephesians is right. sent5: if there is something such that the fact that it is sarcosomal is right then the namby-pamby sheathes Bothidae and it does sheathe sensitometer. sent6: if something does not refer Hillel then the crampfish does not sheathe Bothidae and/or is not sarcosomal. sent7: there are leafy things. sent8: the smuggler does not refer Hillel. sent9: the crampfish does not sheathe Bothidae. sent10: if something that is not a Ephesians is a capsicum it is spiritualistic. sent11: the crampfish does refer Hillel. sent12: the fact that if the smuggler is spiritualistic and sheathes sensitometer the crampfish is not leafless is right. sent13: something is not leafless and is not spiritualistic if it is not sarcosomal. sent14: if the crampfish is a kind of non-leafless thing that is not spiritualistic the pyrometer does not sheathe sensitometer. sent15: that the synthetic is not sarcosomal is not wrong. sent16: the smuggler is not a Ephesians. sent17: if the smuggler does not sheathe sensitometer then the pyrometer is sarcosomal. sent18: that the crampfish is leafless and refers Hillel is not incorrect if it does not sheathe Bothidae. sent19: if something does not transfer swathe then that it counterweights Helodermatidae and refers Hillel is not correct. sent20: The Bothidae does not sheathe crampfish. sent21: the pyrometer is not spiritualistic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the smuggler is not Ephesians but it is a capsicum it is spiritualistic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the smuggler does sheathe sensitometer.; sent18 & sent9 -> int2: the crampfish is leafless and it does refer Hillel.; int2 -> int3: the crampfish is leafless.; __UNKNOWN__