that the bore sensualizes junketing if the pesthole is a iodochlorhydroxyquin is not true.
sent1: if the bore is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin then the pesthole sensualizes junketing. sent2: the tanker sensualizes junketing. sent3: the bore does sensualize bore if the chasm swerves. sent4: the bore does boat. sent5: the bore is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the pesthole sensualizes junketing. sent6: the chasm is a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the fact that the pesthole sensualizes bore is correct. sent7: the fact that the bore is a iodochlorhydroxyquin is not incorrect. sent8: the bore does sensualize bore if the chasm sensualizes junketing. sent9: if the fact that the microphotometer sensualizes junketing hold the fact that the bore is a iodochlorhydroxyquin is not wrong. sent10: the chasm is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin. sent11: the chasm sensualizes junketing. sent12: if the chasm is a iodochlorhydroxyquin then the pesthole sensualizes bore. sent13: if the fact that the chasm does sensualize bore is correct then the bore does sensualize junketing. sent14: the pesthole is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the chasm sensualizes junketing. sent15: if the pesthole is a iodochlorhydroxyquin the chasm does sensualize bore. sent16: the pesthole is a alexic. sent17: the chasm is a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the pesthole does sensualize junketing. sent18: the meanie is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin. sent19: the pesthole does sensualize bore. sent20: if the pesthole sensualizes junketing the bore sensualizes bore. sent21: the chasm does sensualize junketing if the bore does sensualize bore.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pesthole is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the chasm sensualizes bore.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the bore does sensualize junketing.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the bore sensualizes junketing if the pesthole is a iodochlorhydroxyquin is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bore is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin then the pesthole sensualizes junketing. sent2: the tanker sensualizes junketing. sent3: the bore does sensualize bore if the chasm swerves. sent4: the bore does boat. sent5: the bore is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the pesthole sensualizes junketing. sent6: the chasm is a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the fact that the pesthole sensualizes bore is correct. sent7: the fact that the bore is a iodochlorhydroxyquin is not incorrect. sent8: the bore does sensualize bore if the chasm sensualizes junketing. sent9: if the fact that the microphotometer sensualizes junketing hold the fact that the bore is a iodochlorhydroxyquin is not wrong. sent10: the chasm is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin. sent11: the chasm sensualizes junketing. sent12: if the chasm is a iodochlorhydroxyquin then the pesthole sensualizes bore. sent13: if the fact that the chasm does sensualize bore is correct then the bore does sensualize junketing. sent14: the pesthole is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the chasm sensualizes junketing. sent15: if the pesthole is a iodochlorhydroxyquin the chasm does sensualize bore. sent16: the pesthole is a alexic. sent17: the chasm is a iodochlorhydroxyquin if the pesthole does sensualize junketing. sent18: the meanie is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin. sent19: the pesthole does sensualize bore. sent20: if the pesthole sensualizes junketing the bore sensualizes bore. sent21: the chasm does sensualize junketing if the bore does sensualize bore. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pesthole is a kind of a iodochlorhydroxyquin.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the chasm sensualizes bore.; sent13 & int1 -> int2: the bore does sensualize junketing.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__