the fact that the orchid is not a goldsmith is true.
sent1: if something is a kind of a actinolite it is not Eritrean. sent2: the exocrine is not psychometric if the dika is not a kind of a Eritrean. sent3: the exocrine is not psychometric. sent4: if there is something such that it does not finger biochip that the dika is both classificatory and not a actinolite is not correct. sent5: that there is something such that it does finger biochip is correct. sent6: if the dika is not a kind of a Eritrean the exocrine is not a Eritrean and it is non-psychometric. sent7: the dika is not a Eritrean if it is a actinolite. sent8: the fact that the dika is a kind of classificatory a actinolite does not hold. sent9: the orchid is not a kind of a goldsmith if the exocrine is a kind of non-Eritrean thing that is psychometric. sent10: the fact that the dika is classificatory and a actinolite is false if there is something such that the fact that it does not finger biochip is not incorrect. sent11: if the fact that something is classificatory but it is not a actinolite is incorrect then that it is not a Eritrean is correct. sent12: there is something such that it does not finger biochip.
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: that the dika is a kind of classificatory thing that is not a actinolite is false.; sent11 -> int2: that the dika is not a Eritrean is not false if the fact that that it is classificatory and is not a actinolite is right is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dika is not a Eritrean.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the exocrine is not Eritrean and it is not psychometric.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the orchid is not a goldsmith is true. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a actinolite it is not Eritrean. sent2: the exocrine is not psychometric if the dika is not a kind of a Eritrean. sent3: the exocrine is not psychometric. sent4: if there is something such that it does not finger biochip that the dika is both classificatory and not a actinolite is not correct. sent5: that there is something such that it does finger biochip is correct. sent6: if the dika is not a kind of a Eritrean the exocrine is not a Eritrean and it is non-psychometric. sent7: the dika is not a Eritrean if it is a actinolite. sent8: the fact that the dika is a kind of classificatory a actinolite does not hold. sent9: the orchid is not a kind of a goldsmith if the exocrine is a kind of non-Eritrean thing that is psychometric. sent10: the fact that the dika is classificatory and a actinolite is false if there is something such that the fact that it does not finger biochip is not incorrect. sent11: if the fact that something is classificatory but it is not a actinolite is incorrect then that it is not a Eritrean is correct. sent12: there is something such that it does not finger biochip. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent4 -> int1: that the dika is a kind of classificatory thing that is not a actinolite is false.; sent11 -> int2: that the dika is not a Eritrean is not false if the fact that that it is classificatory and is not a actinolite is right is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the dika is not a Eritrean.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: the exocrine is not Eritrean and it is not psychometric.; __UNKNOWN__