the fact that the ICE is not instructive and reads valsartan is not correct.
sent1: if the bed-and-breakfast is not instructive then it reads valsartan and it reads waviness. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a A-line and is not a stinker is incorrect if it does read bratwurst. sent3: the dogbane is sociable if the fact that the see is a dahl and not a A-line is not true. sent4: if the bratwurst is not a kind of a closeup the bed-and-breakfast is a A-line and is a kind of a closeup. sent5: The bratwurst does read bratwurst. sent6: something does read bratwurst and is not sociable if it is not a kind of a dahl. sent7: if the dogbane reads waviness then the fact that the fact that the ICE is not instructive and reads valsartan hold is not right. sent8: if the see is not a grab and it is not a surge then the bed-and-breakfast is not instructive. sent9: the ICE is not a kind of a dahl if the bed-and-breakfast does read waviness. sent10: the bratwurst does read bratwurst. sent11: if the dogbane reads waviness then the fact that the ICE is instructive and reads valsartan is not correct. sent12: the dogbane does read waviness if it is a sociable. sent13: the fact that the see is a dahl but it is not a kind of a A-line does not hold if the bed-and-breakfast is a A-line.
the fact that the ICE is a A-line but it is not a kind of a stinker does not hold.
sent2 -> int1: if the ICE does read bratwurst the fact that it is a kind of a A-line and it is not a kind of a stinker does not hold.; sent6 -> int2: the ICE does read bratwurst but it is not a sociable if it is not a dahl.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ICE is not instructive and reads valsartan is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bed-and-breakfast is not instructive then it reads valsartan and it reads waviness. sent2: the fact that something is a kind of a A-line and is not a stinker is incorrect if it does read bratwurst. sent3: the dogbane is sociable if the fact that the see is a dahl and not a A-line is not true. sent4: if the bratwurst is not a kind of a closeup the bed-and-breakfast is a A-line and is a kind of a closeup. sent5: The bratwurst does read bratwurst. sent6: something does read bratwurst and is not sociable if it is not a kind of a dahl. sent7: if the dogbane reads waviness then the fact that the fact that the ICE is not instructive and reads valsartan hold is not right. sent8: if the see is not a grab and it is not a surge then the bed-and-breakfast is not instructive. sent9: the ICE is not a kind of a dahl if the bed-and-breakfast does read waviness. sent10: the bratwurst does read bratwurst. sent11: if the dogbane reads waviness then the fact that the ICE is instructive and reads valsartan is not correct. sent12: the dogbane does read waviness if it is a sociable. sent13: the fact that the see is a dahl but it is not a kind of a A-line does not hold if the bed-and-breakfast is a A-line. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__