the fact that there exists something such that if it does not waste vermiculite then that it transaminates philosopher and it is not a division is false is wrong.
sent1: if the hangover does not waste vermiculite then the fact that it transaminates philosopher and it is a division is wrong. sent2: the hangover does transaminate philosopher but it is not a kind of a division if it does not waste vermiculite. sent3: there is something such that if it does not waste vermiculite that it does transaminate philosopher and is a division is not correct. sent4: the oxalate does transaminate philosopher but it is not a kind of a convert if it is not a kind of a masculine. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not waste vermiculite then it does transaminate philosopher and it is not a kind of a division. sent6: that something does letter servitor and is a Greek is not right if it is not a factor. sent7: the fact that something transaminates philosopher and is not a kind of a division is incorrect if it does not waste vermiculite. sent8: there is something such that if it does transaminate hangover that it letters oxalate and is not judicial does not hold. sent9: the fact that something does transaminate philosopher and is not a kind of a division is not correct if it wastes vermiculite. sent10: there exists something such that if it wastes vermiculite the fact that it transaminates philosopher and it is not a kind of a division is not right.
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the hangover does transaminate philosopher and is not a division is wrong if it does not waste vermiculite.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it does not waste vermiculite then that it transaminates philosopher and it is not a division is false is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the hangover does not waste vermiculite then the fact that it transaminates philosopher and it is a division is wrong. sent2: the hangover does transaminate philosopher but it is not a kind of a division if it does not waste vermiculite. sent3: there is something such that if it does not waste vermiculite that it does transaminate philosopher and is a division is not correct. sent4: the oxalate does transaminate philosopher but it is not a kind of a convert if it is not a kind of a masculine. sent5: there exists something such that if it does not waste vermiculite then it does transaminate philosopher and it is not a kind of a division. sent6: that something does letter servitor and is a Greek is not right if it is not a factor. sent7: the fact that something transaminates philosopher and is not a kind of a division is incorrect if it does not waste vermiculite. sent8: there is something such that if it does transaminate hangover that it letters oxalate and is not judicial does not hold. sent9: the fact that something does transaminate philosopher and is not a kind of a division is not correct if it wastes vermiculite. sent10: there exists something such that if it wastes vermiculite the fact that it transaminates philosopher and it is not a kind of a division is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the fact that the hangover does transaminate philosopher and is not a division is wrong if it does not waste vermiculite.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__