the mockernut is a triolein but it is not a determiner.
sent1: if there is something such that that either it is not a repulsion or it is not a effervescence or both is true the crypt is not a repulsion. sent2: something does not fudge sardine and is a kind of a xylophonist if it is a kind of a dedifferentiation. sent3: if the crypt is a kind of a dedifferentiation the omega-6 is a dedifferentiation. sent4: if something is not a kind of a repulsion then either it is a dedifferentiation or it is a kind of a Katsuwonus or both. sent5: the carnallite is a determiner. sent6: the omega-6 is a kind of a effervescence. sent7: the turnip is not a kind of a repulsion and/or is not a kind of a effervescence if there exists something such that it is not non-acervate. sent8: something does not fudge Beguine and is a kind of a xylophonist if that it is nonvolatile is not wrong. sent9: if something is not a kind of a volatile then the fact that it does not fudge sardine and is a xylophonist does not hold. sent10: that the mockernut is not a determiner is not incorrect. sent11: if that something does fudge Duncan and does beat whip-scorpion is incorrect it is not a kind of a cattle. sent12: that something does fudge Duncan and beats whip-scorpion is wrong if it is not a vest. sent13: the omega-6 is a dedifferentiation if the crypt is a Katsuwonus. sent14: the dualist is a determiner if the mockernut is a triolein. sent15: the polyfoam is a kind of a dedifferentiation that is a repulsion. sent16: that something is a dedifferentiation but it is not a triolein is false if it is not a repulsion. sent17: everything is not a kind of a vest. sent18: if the fresco is not a cattle then it is extricable and it is acervate. sent19: if the omega-6 is a kind of a effervescence then it is not a kind of a repulsion and is not a Katsuwonus. sent20: if that the omega-6 is a dedifferentiation hold then the mockernut is not a volatile. sent21: something that is a kind of a determiner is not a volatile.
sent9 -> int1: that the polyfoam does not fudge sardine but it is a xylophonist is not right if the fact that it is not volatile is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polyfoam is not volatile.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the polyfoam does not fudge sardine but it is a kind of a xylophonist is false.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the polyfoam does not fudge sardine and is the xylophonist if the polyfoam is a kind of a dedifferentiation is not false.; sent15 -> int4: the polyfoam is a kind of a dedifferentiation.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the polyfoam does not fudge sardine and is a kind of a xylophonist.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the polyfoam is volatile.;
the fact that the mockernut is a kind of a triolein but it is not a determiner is false.
sent12 -> int8: the fact that the sardine does fudge Duncan and it beats whip-scorpion is false if it does not vest.; sent17 -> int9: the sardine does not vest.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the sardine fudges Duncan and it beats whip-scorpion is not true.; int10 -> int11: there is nothing such that it does fudge Duncan and does beat whip-scorpion.; int11 -> int12: that the fresco does fudge Duncan and it beats whip-scorpion is incorrect.; sent11 -> int13: the fresco is not a kind of a cattle if that it does fudge Duncan and it beats whip-scorpion is false.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the fresco is not a cattle.; sent18 & int14 -> int15: the fresco is both not inextricable and acervate.; int15 -> int16: the fresco is acervate.; int16 -> int17: the fact that there exists something such that it is acervate is not incorrect.; sent7 & int17 -> int18: the turnip is not a repulsion or it is not a kind of a effervescence or both.; int18 -> int19: something is not a repulsion and/or is not a effervescence.; sent1 & int19 -> int20: the crypt is not a kind of a repulsion.; sent4 -> int21: the fact that if the crypt is not the repulsion then the crypt is a kind of a dedifferentiation and/or it is a Katsuwonus hold.; int20 & int21 -> int22: the crypt is a dedifferentiation or it is a kind of a Katsuwonus or both.; sent13 & sent3 & int22 -> int23: the omega-6 is a dedifferentiation.; int23 & sent20 -> int24: the mockernut is not a volatile.;
$hypothesis$ = the mockernut is a triolein but it is not a determiner. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that that either it is not a repulsion or it is not a effervescence or both is true the crypt is not a repulsion. sent2: something does not fudge sardine and is a kind of a xylophonist if it is a kind of a dedifferentiation. sent3: if the crypt is a kind of a dedifferentiation the omega-6 is a dedifferentiation. sent4: if something is not a kind of a repulsion then either it is a dedifferentiation or it is a kind of a Katsuwonus or both. sent5: the carnallite is a determiner. sent6: the omega-6 is a kind of a effervescence. sent7: the turnip is not a kind of a repulsion and/or is not a kind of a effervescence if there exists something such that it is not non-acervate. sent8: something does not fudge Beguine and is a kind of a xylophonist if that it is nonvolatile is not wrong. sent9: if something is not a kind of a volatile then the fact that it does not fudge sardine and is a xylophonist does not hold. sent10: that the mockernut is not a determiner is not incorrect. sent11: if that something does fudge Duncan and does beat whip-scorpion is incorrect it is not a kind of a cattle. sent12: that something does fudge Duncan and beats whip-scorpion is wrong if it is not a vest. sent13: the omega-6 is a dedifferentiation if the crypt is a Katsuwonus. sent14: the dualist is a determiner if the mockernut is a triolein. sent15: the polyfoam is a kind of a dedifferentiation that is a repulsion. sent16: that something is a dedifferentiation but it is not a triolein is false if it is not a repulsion. sent17: everything is not a kind of a vest. sent18: if the fresco is not a cattle then it is extricable and it is acervate. sent19: if the omega-6 is a kind of a effervescence then it is not a kind of a repulsion and is not a Katsuwonus. sent20: if that the omega-6 is a dedifferentiation hold then the mockernut is not a volatile. sent21: something that is a kind of a determiner is not a volatile. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the polyfoam does not fudge sardine but it is a xylophonist is not right if the fact that it is not volatile is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the polyfoam is not volatile.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the polyfoam does not fudge sardine but it is a kind of a xylophonist is false.; sent2 -> int3: the fact that the polyfoam does not fudge sardine and is the xylophonist if the polyfoam is a kind of a dedifferentiation is not false.; sent15 -> int4: the polyfoam is a kind of a dedifferentiation.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the polyfoam does not fudge sardine and is a kind of a xylophonist.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the polyfoam is volatile.; __UNKNOWN__