the reissuing Haliaeetus occurs.
sent1: the fact that both the passionateness and the allomorphicness occurs does not hold. sent2: the sea-duty does not occur if that both the non-passionateness and the allomorphicness happens does not hold. sent3: the reissuing Haliaeetus happens if the magistracy does not occur and the sea-duty happens. sent4: the sending Ruptiliocarpon does not occur if the fact that not the consternating Karelian but the loop occurs is not right. sent5: the detailing happens. sent6: if that not the reissuing blood but the winding occurs is not true the fact that the winding does not occur is right. sent7: the reissuing tune-up but not the detailing happens if the fact that the economicalness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the reissuing blood does not occur. sent9: that the epiphyticness occurs is right. sent10: that the reissuing Haliaeetus does not occur is caused by that the wound and the magistracy happens. sent11: the reissuing reformer occurs. sent12: that the inexpressibleness does not occur is prevented by either the magistracy or that the sea-duty does not occur or both. sent13: if that not the consternating vanadate but the overspill happens is not right the sending attache does not occur. sent14: if the allomorphicness happens then the magistracy occurs. sent15: the magistracy and/or that the sea-duty does not occur is caused by that the winding does not occur. sent16: the wound happens. sent17: the sinkableness happens. sent18: the seiche does not occur. sent19: if the details happens the sea-duty happens. sent20: the frontness occurs. sent21: that the detailing does not occur and the reissuing blood does not occur is brought about by that the reissuing tune-up does not occur. sent22: that the snowballing kat occurs prevents that the dramatization does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both the non-passionateness and the allomorphicness happens is not right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sea-duty does not occur.; sent19 & sent5 -> int2: the sea-duty occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-passionateness and the allomorphicness happens.; int4 -> int5: the allomorphicness happens.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the magistracy happens.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the winding and the magistracy occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the reissuing Haliaeetus happens.
$hypothesis$ = the reissuing Haliaeetus occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the passionateness and the allomorphicness occurs does not hold. sent2: the sea-duty does not occur if that both the non-passionateness and the allomorphicness happens does not hold. sent3: the reissuing Haliaeetus happens if the magistracy does not occur and the sea-duty happens. sent4: the sending Ruptiliocarpon does not occur if the fact that not the consternating Karelian but the loop occurs is not right. sent5: the detailing happens. sent6: if that not the reissuing blood but the winding occurs is not true the fact that the winding does not occur is right. sent7: the reissuing tune-up but not the detailing happens if the fact that the economicalness occurs is not incorrect. sent8: the reissuing blood does not occur. sent9: that the epiphyticness occurs is right. sent10: that the reissuing Haliaeetus does not occur is caused by that the wound and the magistracy happens. sent11: the reissuing reformer occurs. sent12: that the inexpressibleness does not occur is prevented by either the magistracy or that the sea-duty does not occur or both. sent13: if that not the consternating vanadate but the overspill happens is not right the sending attache does not occur. sent14: if the allomorphicness happens then the magistracy occurs. sent15: the magistracy and/or that the sea-duty does not occur is caused by that the winding does not occur. sent16: the wound happens. sent17: the sinkableness happens. sent18: the seiche does not occur. sent19: if the details happens the sea-duty happens. sent20: the frontness occurs. sent21: that the detailing does not occur and the reissuing blood does not occur is brought about by that the reissuing tune-up does not occur. sent22: that the snowballing kat occurs prevents that the dramatization does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both the non-passionateness and the allomorphicness happens is not right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the sea-duty does not occur.; sent19 & sent5 -> int2: the sea-duty occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: both the non-passionateness and the allomorphicness happens.; int4 -> int5: the allomorphicness happens.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the magistracy happens.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the winding and the magistracy occurs.; int7 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__