something is not agrobiologic or it does throng or both.
sent1: the woof is not a hypogonadism if the fact that it is non-agrobiologic and/or does throng does not hold. sent2: the countryside is a vindication if that it sketches is not incorrect. sent3: the athanor is a hypogonadism. sent4: if the woof is not a kind of a hypogonadism it is not a fiftieth and is Bismarckian. sent5: if the woof is not a fiftieth but it is Bismarckian it does organize ferrite. sent6: the countryside is not a kind of a vindication. sent7: that if the woof is a hypogonadism the countryside is Bismarckian is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that either the woof is not agrobiologic or it throngs or both is wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the woof is not a kind of a hypogonadism hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the woof is not a fiftieth and is Bismarckian.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the woof does organize ferrite.;
the countryside is Bismarckian.
$hypothesis$ = something is not agrobiologic or it does throng or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the woof is not a hypogonadism if the fact that it is non-agrobiologic and/or does throng does not hold. sent2: the countryside is a vindication if that it sketches is not incorrect. sent3: the athanor is a hypogonadism. sent4: if the woof is not a kind of a hypogonadism it is not a fiftieth and is Bismarckian. sent5: if the woof is not a fiftieth but it is Bismarckian it does organize ferrite. sent6: the countryside is not a kind of a vindication. sent7: that if the woof is a hypogonadism the countryside is Bismarckian is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that either the woof is not agrobiologic or it throngs or both is wrong.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the woof is not a kind of a hypogonadism hold.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the woof is not a fiftieth and is Bismarckian.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the woof does organize ferrite.; __UNKNOWN__