the thane is not textile.
sent1: the fact that the songwriter does deserve FAO is true if that it is cursorial is right. sent2: if that something is non-cursorial thing that does resist exhibition does not hold then it is not cursorial. sent3: the gastroscope is not a Eolithic. sent4: if the songwriter is not unimpressionable then the fact that it is a Capreolus and/or it is paramagnetic is incorrect. sent5: the songwriter is not a Capreolus. sent6: the songwriter is not unimpressionable. sent7: the gastroscope is a Capreolus. sent8: if the underwear is not non-cursorial then the songwriter is non-cursorial. sent9: if something is not haptic it is textile and it is not unimpressionable. sent10: if the thane does not deserve FAO but it is textile that the songwriter is not textile is right. sent11: the underwear is not a reflexology if the thane is not non-textile and is haptic. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is not cursorial is true then the epinephrine is not cursorial. sent13: the underwear deserves FAO. sent14: the epinephrine is not cursorial if there exists something such that that it resists exhibition and is cursorial does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that it does resist exhibition and is cursorial. sent16: there is something such that it is not a Capreolus. sent17: that the songwriter is not unimpressionable is right if the epinephrine is cursorial and resists exhibition. sent18: the songwriter is not a Capreolus if it is impressionable. sent19: if something deserves FAO that it is haptic and is not a kind of a reflexology is wrong. sent20: the Neopolitan is not haptic if the songwriter is not textile. sent21: if the gastroscope is not a Eolithic the fact that it resists exhibition and is cursorial does not hold. sent22: if the underwear is a Eolithic then the fact that it is non-cursorial thing that does resist exhibition is wrong. sent23: there are non-paramagnetic things. sent24: the underwear is a kind of a Eolithic. sent25: if there is something such that the fact that either it is a Capreolus or it is paramagnetic or both is false the thane is haptic. sent26: the fact that the underwear does deserve FAO hold if the epinephrine is non-cursorial. sent27: either something is a kind of a Capreolus or it is paramagnetic or both.
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: that the songwriter is a kind of a Capreolus and/or it is paramagnetic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it either is a kind of a Capreolus or is paramagnetic or both is not correct.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the thane is haptic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the thane is not textile is incorrect.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the thane is textile thing that is haptic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the underwear is not a kind of a reflexology.; sent21 & sent3 -> int6: that the gastroscope resists exhibition and is cursorial is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it resists exhibition and it is cursorial does not hold.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the epinephrine is not cursorial.;
the Neopolitan is not a Eolithic.
$hypothesis$ = the thane is not textile. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the songwriter does deserve FAO is true if that it is cursorial is right. sent2: if that something is non-cursorial thing that does resist exhibition does not hold then it is not cursorial. sent3: the gastroscope is not a Eolithic. sent4: if the songwriter is not unimpressionable then the fact that it is a Capreolus and/or it is paramagnetic is incorrect. sent5: the songwriter is not a Capreolus. sent6: the songwriter is not unimpressionable. sent7: the gastroscope is a Capreolus. sent8: if the underwear is not non-cursorial then the songwriter is non-cursorial. sent9: if something is not haptic it is textile and it is not unimpressionable. sent10: if the thane does not deserve FAO but it is textile that the songwriter is not textile is right. sent11: the underwear is not a reflexology if the thane is not non-textile and is haptic. sent12: if there exists something such that that it is not cursorial is true then the epinephrine is not cursorial. sent13: the underwear deserves FAO. sent14: the epinephrine is not cursorial if there exists something such that that it resists exhibition and is cursorial does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that it does resist exhibition and is cursorial. sent16: there is something such that it is not a Capreolus. sent17: that the songwriter is not unimpressionable is right if the epinephrine is cursorial and resists exhibition. sent18: the songwriter is not a Capreolus if it is impressionable. sent19: if something deserves FAO that it is haptic and is not a kind of a reflexology is wrong. sent20: the Neopolitan is not haptic if the songwriter is not textile. sent21: if the gastroscope is not a Eolithic the fact that it resists exhibition and is cursorial does not hold. sent22: if the underwear is a Eolithic then the fact that it is non-cursorial thing that does resist exhibition is wrong. sent23: there are non-paramagnetic things. sent24: the underwear is a kind of a Eolithic. sent25: if there is something such that the fact that either it is a Capreolus or it is paramagnetic or both is false the thane is haptic. sent26: the fact that the underwear does deserve FAO hold if the epinephrine is non-cursorial. sent27: either something is a kind of a Capreolus or it is paramagnetic or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent6 -> int1: that the songwriter is a kind of a Capreolus and/or it is paramagnetic is incorrect.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that the fact that it either is a kind of a Capreolus or is paramagnetic or both is not correct.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the thane is haptic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the thane is not textile is incorrect.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the thane is textile thing that is haptic.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the underwear is not a kind of a reflexology.; sent21 & sent3 -> int6: that the gastroscope resists exhibition and is cursorial is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it resists exhibition and it is cursorial does not hold.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the epinephrine is not cursorial.; __UNKNOWN__