the measuring pyrocellulose occurs and the apostleship happens.
sent1: if the bethinking occurs then the accommodating happens. sent2: the plunging occurs if the underachievement happens. sent3: if the accommodating happens then the underachievement occurs. sent4: the non-cloudiness and the apostleship happens if the overlordship does not occur. sent5: the underachievement happens if the bethinking occurs. sent6: the apostleship occurs. sent7: the measuring pyrocellulose occurs if the accommodating occurs. sent8: the overlordship does not occur and the depositing praline occurs if that the upset does not occur is right. sent9: the indusialness occurs if the measuring amateurism does not occur and the centralness does not occur. sent10: if the ideographicness occurs then the incredibleness occurs. sent11: that the measuring pyrocellulose does not occur is brought about by that the non-cloudyness and the apostleship happens. sent12: the adulteration happens and the underachievement happens. sent13: if that the thaumatolatry and the soiling occurs is not right then the legatoness does not occur. sent14: that the bethinking occurs and/or that the accommodating occurs is brought about by that the designation does not occur. sent15: if that both the trundling aquatic and the non-caduceanness occurs does not hold then the upset does not occur. sent16: if the incredibleness happens the designation does not occur but the catcher happens. sent17: the fact that that the adulteration but not the bethinking occurs is not incorrect is not correct. sent18: that the measuring amateurism does not occur and the centralness does not occur hold if the distributiveness does not occur. sent19: the underachievement occurs. sent20: the indusialness prevents that the ideographicness does not occur. sent21: if the legatoness does not occur then the non-distributiveness and the non-outdoorsness happens.
sent12 -> int1: the adulteration happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bethinking does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the adulteration but not the bethinking occurs.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bethinking occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the accommodating occurs.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the measuring pyrocellulose occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the plunge but not the biogeneticness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the measuring pyrocellulose occurs and the apostleship happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bethinking occurs then the accommodating happens. sent2: the plunging occurs if the underachievement happens. sent3: if the accommodating happens then the underachievement occurs. sent4: the non-cloudiness and the apostleship happens if the overlordship does not occur. sent5: the underachievement happens if the bethinking occurs. sent6: the apostleship occurs. sent7: the measuring pyrocellulose occurs if the accommodating occurs. sent8: the overlordship does not occur and the depositing praline occurs if that the upset does not occur is right. sent9: the indusialness occurs if the measuring amateurism does not occur and the centralness does not occur. sent10: if the ideographicness occurs then the incredibleness occurs. sent11: that the measuring pyrocellulose does not occur is brought about by that the non-cloudyness and the apostleship happens. sent12: the adulteration happens and the underachievement happens. sent13: if that the thaumatolatry and the soiling occurs is not right then the legatoness does not occur. sent14: that the bethinking occurs and/or that the accommodating occurs is brought about by that the designation does not occur. sent15: if that both the trundling aquatic and the non-caduceanness occurs does not hold then the upset does not occur. sent16: if the incredibleness happens the designation does not occur but the catcher happens. sent17: the fact that that the adulteration but not the bethinking occurs is not incorrect is not correct. sent18: that the measuring amateurism does not occur and the centralness does not occur hold if the distributiveness does not occur. sent19: the underachievement occurs. sent20: the indusialness prevents that the ideographicness does not occur. sent21: if the legatoness does not occur then the non-distributiveness and the non-outdoorsness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the adulteration happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bethinking does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the adulteration but not the bethinking occurs.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bethinking occurs.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the accommodating occurs.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the measuring pyrocellulose occurs.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__