that the sightreader is non-unmindful thing that is not sarcolemmic is not right.
sent1: if the lessor is not a winged then the fact that the sightreader is not unmindful and it is not sarcolemmic is incorrect. sent2: that the sightreader is unmindful but not sarcolemmic does not hold. sent3: the softball is plausible if the fact that that the weathervane is gymnastic thing that is not a Acroclinium is wrong is not incorrect. sent4: a plausible thing is pasta. sent5: if the softball is a kind of a pasta then the fact that the lessor is not pasta but it does not braid unimportance is not true. sent6: something is not a kind of a winged if that it is a pasta and it does not braid unimportance is wrong. sent7: that the weathervane is gymnastic but it is not a kind of a Acroclinium does not hold.
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the softball is plausible.; sent4 -> int2: if the softball is plausible then that it is a kind of a pasta is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the softball is a pasta.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the lessor is a pasta that does not braid unimportance does not hold.; sent6 -> int5: the lessor is not a winged if the fact that it is a kind of a pasta and it does not braid unimportance is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lessor is not a winged.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the sightreader is non-unmindful thing that is not sarcolemmic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the lessor is not a winged then the fact that the sightreader is not unmindful and it is not sarcolemmic is incorrect. sent2: that the sightreader is unmindful but not sarcolemmic does not hold. sent3: the softball is plausible if the fact that that the weathervane is gymnastic thing that is not a Acroclinium is wrong is not incorrect. sent4: a plausible thing is pasta. sent5: if the softball is a kind of a pasta then the fact that the lessor is not pasta but it does not braid unimportance is not true. sent6: something is not a kind of a winged if that it is a pasta and it does not braid unimportance is wrong. sent7: that the weathervane is gymnastic but it is not a kind of a Acroclinium does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent7 -> int1: the softball is plausible.; sent4 -> int2: if the softball is plausible then that it is a kind of a pasta is true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the softball is a pasta.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the fact that the lessor is a pasta that does not braid unimportance does not hold.; sent6 -> int5: the lessor is not a winged if the fact that it is a kind of a pasta and it does not braid unimportance is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the lessor is not a winged.; int6 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__