that the pargeting does lysogenize allogamy and is a Gulu is not correct.
sent1: if the fact that the universe is not a kind of a Postum and/or it is a xerox is wrong the pargeting is not a Postum. sent2: if the universe is a Postum then the fact that it besots Edo and is not a liftman is incorrect. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a liftman hold then the pargeting does besot Edo and/or is a liftman. sent4: if the fact that something is bicameral but not a xerox does not hold it is not a touchback. sent5: the pad does lysogenize allogamy. sent6: that the pargeting does lysogenize allogamy and is a Gulu is not correct if the tomentum is not a touchback. sent7: the pizza is not a Postum. sent8: if something besots Edo then it is a Gulu. sent9: the tomentum is not a kind of a touchback if it is not bicameral. sent10: if the universe is bicameral it does not besot Edo. sent11: the pizza is not a liftman if it is a Postum and it besots Edo. sent12: if the universe does not besot Edo the pizza is not a Postum and does besot Edo. sent13: if the pizza is not a xerox the fact that the tomentum is a liftman and it is a Postum is not correct. sent14: the tomentum is a liftman. sent15: the pizza is a liftman. sent16: if the universe does not besot Edo the pizza is not a kind of a Postum. sent17: if something is a kind of a Postum and it besots Edo then it is not a kind of a liftman. sent18: there exists something such that it does not subrogate snood. sent19: the tomentum does not besot Edo but it is bicameral. sent20: if something is not a Postum and besots Edo then it is not a liftman. sent21: if the fact that the pizza is not a touchback is not false that the universe is not a Postum and/or is a xerox is incorrect. sent22: that something is not a kind of a touchback if it is not bicameral is not false. sent23: if either something does besot sovereignty or it does not subrogate heroics or both it is not a kind of a touchback.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the universe is bicameral.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the universe does not besot Edo.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the pizza is not a Postum but it does besot Edo.; sent20 -> int3: the pizza is not a liftman if it is not a Postum and it besots Edo.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the pizza is a kind of a liftman does not hold.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the universe is not bicameral.; sent4 -> int7: the tomentum is not a touchback if that it is bicameral and it is not a xerox is incorrect.;
the tomentum does not admit but it is archiepiscopal.
$hypothesis$ = that the pargeting does lysogenize allogamy and is a Gulu is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the universe is not a kind of a Postum and/or it is a xerox is wrong the pargeting is not a Postum. sent2: if the universe is a Postum then the fact that it besots Edo and is not a liftman is incorrect. sent3: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a liftman hold then the pargeting does besot Edo and/or is a liftman. sent4: if the fact that something is bicameral but not a xerox does not hold it is not a touchback. sent5: the pad does lysogenize allogamy. sent6: that the pargeting does lysogenize allogamy and is a Gulu is not correct if the tomentum is not a touchback. sent7: the pizza is not a Postum. sent8: if something besots Edo then it is a Gulu. sent9: the tomentum is not a kind of a touchback if it is not bicameral. sent10: if the universe is bicameral it does not besot Edo. sent11: the pizza is not a liftman if it is a Postum and it besots Edo. sent12: if the universe does not besot Edo the pizza is not a Postum and does besot Edo. sent13: if the pizza is not a xerox the fact that the tomentum is a liftman and it is a Postum is not correct. sent14: the tomentum is a liftman. sent15: the pizza is a liftman. sent16: if the universe does not besot Edo the pizza is not a kind of a Postum. sent17: if something is a kind of a Postum and it besots Edo then it is not a kind of a liftman. sent18: there exists something such that it does not subrogate snood. sent19: the tomentum does not besot Edo but it is bicameral. sent20: if something is not a Postum and besots Edo then it is not a liftman. sent21: if the fact that the pizza is not a touchback is not false that the universe is not a Postum and/or is a xerox is incorrect. sent22: that something is not a kind of a touchback if it is not bicameral is not false. sent23: if either something does besot sovereignty or it does not subrogate heroics or both it is not a kind of a touchback. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the universe is bicameral.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the universe does not besot Edo.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the pizza is not a Postum but it does besot Edo.; sent20 -> int3: the pizza is not a liftman if it is not a Postum and it besots Edo.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the pizza is a kind of a liftman does not hold.; int4 & sent15 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the universe is not bicameral.; sent4 -> int7: the tomentum is not a touchback if that it is bicameral and it is not a xerox is incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__