the convulsion occurs if the fact that the flit happens is true.
sent1: the non-fallibleness results in the ball and/or the bating. sent2: if that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight does not occur is wrong then the fact that the fallibleness does not occur is not false. sent3: if the balling occurs the flitting does not occur. sent4: that both the non-arbitrariness and the curiousness occurs is not correct. sent5: if the bating happens then that the flit does not occur is true. sent6: that the fact that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight occurs is right is incorrect. sent7: if the bating occurs then the flit happens. sent8: the fact that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight does not occur is incorrect if the convulsion does not occur. sent9: the breezing does not occur. sent10: if the hexangularness does not occur then the fact that the polygonalness does not occur and the staling daiquiri does not occur is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flitting occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the convulsion does not occur.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight does not occur does not hold.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the fallibleness does not occur.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the balling and/or the bating happens.; int3 & sent3 & sent5 -> int4: the flitting does not occur.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the convulsion happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
that both the non-arbitrariness and the curiousness occurs is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the convulsion occurs if the fact that the flit happens is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-fallibleness results in the ball and/or the bating. sent2: if that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight does not occur is wrong then the fact that the fallibleness does not occur is not false. sent3: if the balling occurs the flitting does not occur. sent4: that both the non-arbitrariness and the curiousness occurs is not correct. sent5: if the bating happens then that the flit does not occur is true. sent6: that the fact that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight occurs is right is incorrect. sent7: if the bating occurs then the flit happens. sent8: the fact that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight does not occur is incorrect if the convulsion does not occur. sent9: the breezing does not occur. sent10: if the hexangularness does not occur then the fact that the polygonalness does not occur and the staling daiquiri does not occur is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the flitting occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the convulsion does not occur.; sent8 & assump2 -> int1: the fact that the torchlight does not occur and the daylight does not occur does not hold.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the fallibleness does not occur.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the balling and/or the bating happens.; int3 & sent3 & sent5 -> int4: the flitting does not occur.; assump1 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int5 -> int6: the convulsion happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__