the capitulum is not a predation.
sent1: the Berry is not a kind of a doxology. sent2: the drift is not informational but it is a doxology if it is not postural. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not roughen Pedilanthus and is a doxology does not hold. sent4: if the living-room is not a malodor it does extricate squill. sent5: the connection is not a thioguanine if the drift is both not inner and not a doxology. sent6: if the Berry is not informational then the fact that the drift is both not informational and a doxology is not right. sent7: if the drift is not a thioguanine then the fact that the connection is a thioguanine and it is postural is incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not postural and it is not a thioguanine is not correct then the drift is not a predation. sent9: if that the Crown is not a metatarsal but it is not unusual is not correct the drift is not postural. sent10: that the Crown is a kind of non-metatarsal thing that is usual is false. sent11: the connection does not roughen Pedilanthus. sent12: if the living-room does extricate squill and/or it roughens Pedilanthus the capitulum is not a predation. sent13: if the Berry is a predation but not informational the capitulum is a predation. sent14: that the drift is inner and it is informational is false if the connection is not inner. sent15: the capitulum is not a malodor. sent16: the fact that that the connection is inner thing that is not a thioguanine is true is not right. sent17: the connection is not inner. sent18: the living-room is not a kind of a malodor if that the connection is not inner and not a thioguanine is right. sent19: the fact that the living-room roughens Pedilanthus and is a doxology is wrong if the drift does not roughens Pedilanthus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the connection is not inner and it is not a kind of a thioguanine is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is non-inner thing that is not a thioguanine is false.; sent9 & sent10 -> int2: the drift is not postural.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the drift is non-informational a doxology.;
the capitulum is a predation.
$hypothesis$ = the capitulum is not a predation. ; $context$ = sent1: the Berry is not a kind of a doxology. sent2: the drift is not informational but it is a doxology if it is not postural. sent3: there exists something such that the fact that it does not roughen Pedilanthus and is a doxology does not hold. sent4: if the living-room is not a malodor it does extricate squill. sent5: the connection is not a thioguanine if the drift is both not inner and not a doxology. sent6: if the Berry is not informational then the fact that the drift is both not informational and a doxology is not right. sent7: if the drift is not a thioguanine then the fact that the connection is a thioguanine and it is postural is incorrect. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not postural and it is not a thioguanine is not correct then the drift is not a predation. sent9: if that the Crown is not a metatarsal but it is not unusual is not correct the drift is not postural. sent10: that the Crown is a kind of non-metatarsal thing that is usual is false. sent11: the connection does not roughen Pedilanthus. sent12: if the living-room does extricate squill and/or it roughens Pedilanthus the capitulum is not a predation. sent13: if the Berry is a predation but not informational the capitulum is a predation. sent14: that the drift is inner and it is informational is false if the connection is not inner. sent15: the capitulum is not a malodor. sent16: the fact that that the connection is inner thing that is not a thioguanine is true is not right. sent17: the connection is not inner. sent18: the living-room is not a kind of a malodor if that the connection is not inner and not a thioguanine is right. sent19: the fact that the living-room roughens Pedilanthus and is a doxology is wrong if the drift does not roughens Pedilanthus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the connection is not inner and it is not a kind of a thioguanine is not right.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that that it is non-inner thing that is not a thioguanine is false.; sent9 & sent10 -> int2: the drift is not postural.; sent2 & int2 -> int3: the drift is non-informational a doxology.; __UNKNOWN__