that the haik is not concessive or it is not a kind of a reparation or both is false.
sent1: the torero is impotent if it is a scours or it is not inconspicuous or both. sent2: the torero is a scours and/or inconspicuous. sent3: something is not impotent and/or it is not a reparation if it does scour. sent4: the fact that the torero is a kind of a scours or it is not inconspicuous or both is not incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the haik is not concessive or a reparation or both is incorrect the fact that the torero is potent is correct. sent6: the fact that the roast is not a scours is right. sent7: the haik is a reparation. sent8: the haik is not concessive or it is not a garambulla or both. sent9: the haik is not concessive or is a reparation or both. sent10: the torero is not impotent if that the haik either is not concessive or is not a reparation or both is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the haik is not concessive and/or is not a kind of a reparation is false.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the torero is not impotent.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the torero is impotent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the torero is not a kind of a reparation.
sent3 -> int4: if the haik is a scours then it either is not impotent or is not a reparation or both.;
$hypothesis$ = that the haik is not concessive or it is not a kind of a reparation or both is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the torero is impotent if it is a scours or it is not inconspicuous or both. sent2: the torero is a scours and/or inconspicuous. sent3: something is not impotent and/or it is not a reparation if it does scour. sent4: the fact that the torero is a kind of a scours or it is not inconspicuous or both is not incorrect. sent5: if the fact that the haik is not concessive or a reparation or both is incorrect the fact that the torero is potent is correct. sent6: the fact that the roast is not a scours is right. sent7: the haik is a reparation. sent8: the haik is not concessive or it is not a garambulla or both. sent9: the haik is not concessive or is a reparation or both. sent10: the torero is not impotent if that the haik either is not concessive or is not a reparation or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the haik is not concessive and/or is not a kind of a reparation is false.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the torero is not impotent.; sent1 & sent4 -> int2: the torero is impotent.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__