the fact that the grassfire occurs and/or the congenericness occurs is incorrect.
sent1: the casework does not occur. sent2: that the cremating stevedore does not occur and the tracklessness does not occur prevents that the squeegeeing happens. sent3: that the luff does not occur yields that the describing spot happens. sent4: if the cleaning balanced does not occur then that not the pitter-patter but the conformity happens is not incorrect. sent5: the LASIK does not occur. sent6: the cleaning xenophobia does not occur and the casework does not occur if the pitter-patter does not occur. sent7: the vicarialness happens. sent8: the fact that the brutalization does not occur is correct if the cleaning xenophobia does not occur and the casework does not occur. sent9: the cleaning balanced does not occur if the describing loyalty happens and the vicarialness occurs. sent10: that the describing cowrie does not occur is triggered by that both the cremating paralogism and the describing Cardiff occurs. sent11: the describing loyalty occurs. sent12: the grassfire happens if that the brutalization does not occur is right. sent13: that the grassfire or the congenericness or both occurs is wrong if the describing loyalty does not occur.
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the describing loyalty and the vicarialness happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: that the cleaning balanced does not occur is not false.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that not the pitter-patter but the conformity happens is right.; int3 -> int4: the pitter-patter does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the cleaning xenophobia does not occur and the casework does not occur.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the brutalization does not occur.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the grassfire happens.; int7 -> hypothesis;
that the grassfire happens and/or the congenericness happens is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the grassfire occurs and/or the congenericness occurs is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the casework does not occur. sent2: that the cremating stevedore does not occur and the tracklessness does not occur prevents that the squeegeeing happens. sent3: that the luff does not occur yields that the describing spot happens. sent4: if the cleaning balanced does not occur then that not the pitter-patter but the conformity happens is not incorrect. sent5: the LASIK does not occur. sent6: the cleaning xenophobia does not occur and the casework does not occur if the pitter-patter does not occur. sent7: the vicarialness happens. sent8: the fact that the brutalization does not occur is correct if the cleaning xenophobia does not occur and the casework does not occur. sent9: the cleaning balanced does not occur if the describing loyalty happens and the vicarialness occurs. sent10: that the describing cowrie does not occur is triggered by that both the cremating paralogism and the describing Cardiff occurs. sent11: the describing loyalty occurs. sent12: the grassfire happens if that the brutalization does not occur is right. sent13: that the grassfire or the congenericness or both occurs is wrong if the describing loyalty does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the describing loyalty and the vicarialness happens.; sent9 & int1 -> int2: that the cleaning balanced does not occur is not false.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: that not the pitter-patter but the conformity happens is right.; int3 -> int4: the pitter-patter does not occur.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the cleaning xenophobia does not occur and the casework does not occur.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the brutalization does not occur.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the grassfire happens.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__