there exists something such that the fact that it is intrinsic and it does not splutter burgess is wrong.
sent1: the NB is a Chaldean but it does not splutter Benelux. sent2: the micrometeorite does bowl. sent3: if the ichthyosaurus is not a bowl then it does not splutter burgess and it is intrinsic. sent4: the ichthyosaurus is not cerebrospinal. sent5: that the ichthyosaurus is intrinsic but it does not splutter burgess is false if the micrometeorite is not Slovakian. sent6: there are intrinsic things. sent7: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a allegretto that splutters burgess is false the ichthyosaurus does not splutters burgess. sent8: the ichthyosaurus does not pride. sent9: there is something such that that it does splutter foundry and tweedles undulation is not correct. sent10: the ichthyosaurus does not tweedle undulation. sent11: if something does not splutter burgess that the fact that it splutters Benelux and is not antemortem is correct does not hold. sent12: something does not splutter Benelux but it is a kind of a wrasse if it is not antemortem. sent13: if the fact that something does bowl but it is not Slovakian is not right it is not antemortem. sent14: that the leflunomide is both Slovakian and not a schorl is not correct. sent15: that the containment is a allegretto that splutters burgess is not right if there exists something such that it is intrinsic. sent16: there is nothing that does not splutter Benelux and is a wrasse. sent17: the fact that the ichthyosaurus is cultural and is not Quechuan is not correct.
sent13 -> int1: the micrometeorite is not antemortem if that it is both a bowl and non-Slovakian is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the micrometeorite is a bowl but it is not Slovakian is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the micrometeorite is not antemortem.; sent12 -> int3: the micrometeorite does not splutter Benelux and is a kind of a wrasse if it is not antemortem.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the micrometeorite does not splutter Benelux but it is a wrasse.; sent16 -> int5: the fact that the micrometeorite does not splutter Benelux and is a wrasse is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the micrometeorite is a bowl but it is not Slovakian.; int7 -> int8: the micrometeorite is not Slovakian.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the ichthyosaurus is intrinsic but it does not splutter burgess hold is incorrect.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the felon is a masturbator but not ammino.
sent11 -> int10: if the ichthyosaurus does not splutter burgess that it splutters Benelux and it is not antemortem is false.; sent6 & sent15 -> int11: the fact that the containment is a allegretto and it splutters burgess is not correct.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that that it is a allegretto and it does splutter burgess is not correct.; int12 & sent7 -> int13: the ichthyosaurus does not splutter burgess.; int10 & int13 -> int14: that the ichthyosaurus splutters Benelux but it is not antemortem is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that the fact that it is intrinsic and it does not splutter burgess is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the NB is a Chaldean but it does not splutter Benelux. sent2: the micrometeorite does bowl. sent3: if the ichthyosaurus is not a bowl then it does not splutter burgess and it is intrinsic. sent4: the ichthyosaurus is not cerebrospinal. sent5: that the ichthyosaurus is intrinsic but it does not splutter burgess is false if the micrometeorite is not Slovakian. sent6: there are intrinsic things. sent7: if there is something such that that it is a kind of a allegretto that splutters burgess is false the ichthyosaurus does not splutters burgess. sent8: the ichthyosaurus does not pride. sent9: there is something such that that it does splutter foundry and tweedles undulation is not correct. sent10: the ichthyosaurus does not tweedle undulation. sent11: if something does not splutter burgess that the fact that it splutters Benelux and is not antemortem is correct does not hold. sent12: something does not splutter Benelux but it is a kind of a wrasse if it is not antemortem. sent13: if the fact that something does bowl but it is not Slovakian is not right it is not antemortem. sent14: that the leflunomide is both Slovakian and not a schorl is not correct. sent15: that the containment is a allegretto that splutters burgess is not right if there exists something such that it is intrinsic. sent16: there is nothing that does not splutter Benelux and is a wrasse. sent17: the fact that the ichthyosaurus is cultural and is not Quechuan is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the micrometeorite is not antemortem if that it is both a bowl and non-Slovakian is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the micrometeorite is a bowl but it is not Slovakian is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the micrometeorite is not antemortem.; sent12 -> int3: the micrometeorite does not splutter Benelux and is a kind of a wrasse if it is not antemortem.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the micrometeorite does not splutter Benelux but it is a wrasse.; sent16 -> int5: the fact that the micrometeorite does not splutter Benelux and is a wrasse is not correct.; int4 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the micrometeorite is a bowl but it is not Slovakian.; int7 -> int8: the micrometeorite is not Slovakian.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the fact that the ichthyosaurus is intrinsic but it does not splutter burgess hold is incorrect.; int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__