the malingering bedder happens and the generosity happens.
sent1: the undressing reinsurance does not occur if that the undressing reinsurance but not the counterploting pulley happens is incorrect. sent2: if the landing occurs the malingering bedder happens. sent3: if that not the contracture but the escalation happens does not hold the escalation does not occur. sent4: if the undressing betaine does not occur then the fact that both the malingering bedder and the generosity happens is not correct. sent5: the undressing betaine prevents that the malingering bedder does not occur. sent6: if the cuckoldry happens that not the contracture but the escalation happens is not right. sent7: that the forbearance occurs prevents the non-unclearness. sent8: that the cuckoldry happens and the contracture occurs is false if the fact that the hefting does not occur hold. sent9: that the undressing reinsurance happens but the undressing Peneidae does not occur results in that the hefting does not occur. sent10: the escalation occurs. sent11: that if that the agranulocyticness and the undressing Charleston happens does not hold the undressing Peneidae does not occur is correct. sent12: that the cuckoldry and the hefting occurs is caused by that the undressing reinsurance does not occur. sent13: the undressing betaine does not occur if that both the undressing betaine and the escalation occurs is not correct. sent14: if the fact that the generosity happens and the malingering bedder occurs is correct the land does not occur. sent15: if the escalation happens then the generosity occurs. sent16: the fact that the undressing reinsurance occurs but the counterploting pulley does not occur is wrong if the undressing Peneidae does not occur.
sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the generosity occurs.;
the fact that the malingering bedder and the generosity happens is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the malingering bedder happens and the generosity happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the undressing reinsurance does not occur if that the undressing reinsurance but not the counterploting pulley happens is incorrect. sent2: if the landing occurs the malingering bedder happens. sent3: if that not the contracture but the escalation happens does not hold the escalation does not occur. sent4: if the undressing betaine does not occur then the fact that both the malingering bedder and the generosity happens is not correct. sent5: the undressing betaine prevents that the malingering bedder does not occur. sent6: if the cuckoldry happens that not the contracture but the escalation happens is not right. sent7: that the forbearance occurs prevents the non-unclearness. sent8: that the cuckoldry happens and the contracture occurs is false if the fact that the hefting does not occur hold. sent9: that the undressing reinsurance happens but the undressing Peneidae does not occur results in that the hefting does not occur. sent10: the escalation occurs. sent11: that if that the agranulocyticness and the undressing Charleston happens does not hold the undressing Peneidae does not occur is correct. sent12: that the cuckoldry and the hefting occurs is caused by that the undressing reinsurance does not occur. sent13: the undressing betaine does not occur if that both the undressing betaine and the escalation occurs is not correct. sent14: if the fact that the generosity happens and the malingering bedder occurs is correct the land does not occur. sent15: if the escalation happens then the generosity occurs. sent16: the fact that the undressing reinsurance occurs but the counterploting pulley does not occur is wrong if the undressing Peneidae does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent10 -> int1: the generosity occurs.; __UNKNOWN__