the iva is aptitudinal.
sent1: the crater is infinite. sent2: that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer but it is infinite is wrong if it suspends ancestress. sent3: the crater is not toneless if it is faceless and it is a kind of a rent. sent4: if the fact that the linchpin is a Soledad hold the fact that it is faceless is not wrong. sent5: the iva does suspend ancestress if the linchpin is not aptitudinal. sent6: if that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer but it is infinite does not hold the iva is not aptitudinal. sent7: the linchpin does not notch synovia. sent8: the fact that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer but it is a kind of a rent is false. sent9: the linchpin is not trihydroxy. sent10: that if that the crater is a kind of toned thing that does squat manufacturer is wrong the linchpin does not suspend ancestress is not wrong. sent11: if the fact that the linchpin does notch synovia is not false then the crater is not a Soledad. sent12: the fact that the Bahraini is faceless thing that is not infinite is not true. sent13: if something that is a rent notches synovia it is not toneless. sent14: the fact that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer is true. sent15: if that the linchpin does not rent but it is toneless is wrong the crater is not faceless. sent16: the linchpin is sensitive. sent17: if the crater is not toneless the linchpin is a Soledad. sent18: if the crater rents and it notches synovia then it is not aptitudinal. sent19: if the fact that the linchpin is faceless is right it suspends ancestress. sent20: the iva does notch synovia if the crater is not aptitudinal. sent21: the iva is a glassmaker. sent22: the fact that if something that does notch synovia is aptitudinal it does not suspend ancestress is correct. sent23: if the crater is aptitudinal then the iva is not toneless. sent24: the trepang is a Soledad. sent25: the crater is a rent that notches synovia.
sent13 -> int1: if the crater is a rent that notches synovia it is not toneless.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the crater is not toneless.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the linchpin is a Soledad hold.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the linchpin is faceless.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the linchpin suspends ancestress.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer and is infinite does not hold.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the iva is not non-aptitudinal.
sent12 -> int7: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of faceless thing that is not infinite is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the iva is aptitudinal. ; $context$ = sent1: the crater is infinite. sent2: that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer but it is infinite is wrong if it suspends ancestress. sent3: the crater is not toneless if it is faceless and it is a kind of a rent. sent4: if the fact that the linchpin is a Soledad hold the fact that it is faceless is not wrong. sent5: the iva does suspend ancestress if the linchpin is not aptitudinal. sent6: if that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer but it is infinite does not hold the iva is not aptitudinal. sent7: the linchpin does not notch synovia. sent8: the fact that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer but it is a kind of a rent is false. sent9: the linchpin is not trihydroxy. sent10: that if that the crater is a kind of toned thing that does squat manufacturer is wrong the linchpin does not suspend ancestress is not wrong. sent11: if the fact that the linchpin does notch synovia is not false then the crater is not a Soledad. sent12: the fact that the Bahraini is faceless thing that is not infinite is not true. sent13: if something that is a rent notches synovia it is not toneless. sent14: the fact that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer is true. sent15: if that the linchpin does not rent but it is toneless is wrong the crater is not faceless. sent16: the linchpin is sensitive. sent17: if the crater is not toneless the linchpin is a Soledad. sent18: if the crater rents and it notches synovia then it is not aptitudinal. sent19: if the fact that the linchpin is faceless is right it suspends ancestress. sent20: the iva does notch synovia if the crater is not aptitudinal. sent21: the iva is a glassmaker. sent22: the fact that if something that does notch synovia is aptitudinal it does not suspend ancestress is correct. sent23: if the crater is aptitudinal then the iva is not toneless. sent24: the trepang is a Soledad. sent25: the crater is a rent that notches synovia. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the crater is a rent that notches synovia it is not toneless.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the crater is not toneless.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: that the linchpin is a Soledad hold.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the linchpin is faceless.; int4 & sent19 -> int5: the linchpin suspends ancestress.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the linchpin does not squat manufacturer and is infinite does not hold.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__