the fact that there exists something such that it is a lido that butterflies is not right.
sent1: if something is a diemaker then the fact that the adductor is not a kind of a diemaker and it is non-estrous is wrong. sent2: that the defamer is a bash that does not be does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the defamer is not a bash and it does not be does not hold then the adductor is a kind of a lido. sent4: the sago is a kind of a powerbroker that is a bash. sent5: something is a lido. sent6: the testatrix is a Dendroctonus. sent7: something is either not physiological or not a Kami or both if it does not stretch conventicle. sent8: if the oscillator is not a Litocranius the potboy is not doctoral. sent9: if something is not physiological and/or it is not a Kami then it is a diemaker. sent10: the potboy is not doctoral if the oscillator is a kind of a Dendroctonus. sent11: the orangery calluses. sent12: something does not stretch conventicle if the fact that it does stretch conventicle and it is not an act does not hold. sent13: either the oscillator is a Dendroctonus or it is not a kind of a Litocranius or both if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Dendroctonus. sent14: if the potboy is not doctoral the fact that the gatehouse is not provencal and is not a butterfly does not hold. sent15: if the motile is adaptive the adductor is adaptive. sent16: the motile is adaptive and it is a lido if there exists something such that it is a kind of a butterfly. sent17: if that something is not a kind of a diemaker and it is not estrous is not true it is estrous. sent18: the fact that the orangery stretches conventicle but it does not act does not hold if it is a kind of a callus. sent19: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a bash and does not be. sent20: the fact that that the adductor is a lido and is not a bash is incorrect is not wrong. sent21: the adductor does butterfly. sent22: if the fact that something is not provencal and it does not butterfly is incorrect then it does butterfly.
sent19 -> int1: that the defamer is not a kind of a bash and it does not be is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the adductor is a kind of a lido.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the adductor is a kind of a lido that is a butterfly.; int3 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it is estrous and it is adaptive.
sent17 -> int4: the adductor is estrous if the fact that it is not a diemaker and not estrous does not hold.; sent9 -> int5: if the orangery is not physiological and/or is not a kind of a Kami that it is a diemaker is not incorrect.; sent7 -> int6: the orangery either is not physiological or is not a Kami or both if it does not stretch conventicle.; sent12 -> int7: the orangery does not stretch conventicle if that it stretch conventicle and is not an act is not true.; sent18 & sent11 -> int8: that the orangery stretches conventicle but it is not a kind of an act is false.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the orangery does not stretch conventicle.; int6 & int9 -> int10: either the orangery is not physiological or it is not a kind of a Kami or both.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the orangery is a diemaker.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is a kind of a diemaker.; int12 & sent1 -> int13: that the adductor is both not a diemaker and not estrous is incorrect.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the adductor is estrous.; sent22 -> int15: if that the gatehouse is not provencal and it is not a butterfly does not hold that it is a butterfly is correct.; sent6 -> int16: there exists something such that it is a Dendroctonus.; int16 & sent13 -> int17: the oscillator is a Dendroctonus and/or it is not a Litocranius.; int17 & sent10 & sent8 -> int18: the potboy is not doctoral.; sent14 & int18 -> int19: the fact that the gatehouse is not provencal and it does not butterfly is not right.; int15 & int19 -> int20: the gatehouse butterflies.; int20 -> int21: something butterflies.; int21 & sent16 -> int22: the motile is adaptive and is a kind of a lido.; int22 -> int23: the motile is adaptive.; sent15 & int23 -> int24: the adductor is adaptive.; int14 & int24 -> int25: the adductor is estrous and adaptive.; int25 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is a lido that butterflies is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a diemaker then the fact that the adductor is not a kind of a diemaker and it is non-estrous is wrong. sent2: that the defamer is a bash that does not be does not hold. sent3: if the fact that the defamer is not a bash and it does not be does not hold then the adductor is a kind of a lido. sent4: the sago is a kind of a powerbroker that is a bash. sent5: something is a lido. sent6: the testatrix is a Dendroctonus. sent7: something is either not physiological or not a Kami or both if it does not stretch conventicle. sent8: if the oscillator is not a Litocranius the potboy is not doctoral. sent9: if something is not physiological and/or it is not a Kami then it is a diemaker. sent10: the potboy is not doctoral if the oscillator is a kind of a Dendroctonus. sent11: the orangery calluses. sent12: something does not stretch conventicle if the fact that it does stretch conventicle and it is not an act does not hold. sent13: either the oscillator is a Dendroctonus or it is not a kind of a Litocranius or both if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Dendroctonus. sent14: if the potboy is not doctoral the fact that the gatehouse is not provencal and is not a butterfly does not hold. sent15: if the motile is adaptive the adductor is adaptive. sent16: the motile is adaptive and it is a lido if there exists something such that it is a kind of a butterfly. sent17: if that something is not a kind of a diemaker and it is not estrous is not true it is estrous. sent18: the fact that the orangery stretches conventicle but it does not act does not hold if it is a kind of a callus. sent19: there is nothing such that it is not a kind of a bash and does not be. sent20: the fact that that the adductor is a lido and is not a bash is incorrect is not wrong. sent21: the adductor does butterfly. sent22: if the fact that something is not provencal and it does not butterfly is incorrect then it does butterfly. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 -> int1: that the defamer is not a kind of a bash and it does not be is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the adductor is a kind of a lido.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the adductor is a kind of a lido that is a butterfly.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__