the sharing occurs.
sent1: the liliaceousness does not occur. sent2: if that the level and/or the Sabine happens does not hold the trusteeship does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the dysphemisticness does not occur hold that both the solo and the emmetropicness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the startling sclerite occurs and the dysphemisticness happens is false then the dysphemisticness does not occur. sent5: the dropkicking nurse-midwife does not occur if not the unpaidness but the essay happens. sent6: if the emmetropicness does not occur then the operation happens. sent7: if the fact that the share happens is not wrong then the unpaidness does not occur. sent8: the design does not occur. sent9: the emmetropicness does not occur. sent10: the dropkicking nurse-midwife happens if the operation happens. sent11: that the paidness and the essay happens is triggered by that the sharing occurs. sent12: the fact that the startling sclerite and the dysphemisticness occurs is incorrect if the trusteeship does not occur. sent13: the dropkicking nurse-midwife does not occur if the unpaidness and the essay happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the share occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the unpaidness does not occur and the essay happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the dropkicking nurse-midwife does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int3: the operation happens.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the dropkicking nurse-midwife occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the sharing happens.
$hypothesis$ = the sharing occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the liliaceousness does not occur. sent2: if that the level and/or the Sabine happens does not hold the trusteeship does not occur. sent3: if the fact that the dysphemisticness does not occur hold that both the solo and the emmetropicness occurs does not hold. sent4: if the fact that the startling sclerite occurs and the dysphemisticness happens is false then the dysphemisticness does not occur. sent5: the dropkicking nurse-midwife does not occur if not the unpaidness but the essay happens. sent6: if the emmetropicness does not occur then the operation happens. sent7: if the fact that the share happens is not wrong then the unpaidness does not occur. sent8: the design does not occur. sent9: the emmetropicness does not occur. sent10: the dropkicking nurse-midwife happens if the operation happens. sent11: that the paidness and the essay happens is triggered by that the sharing occurs. sent12: the fact that the startling sclerite and the dysphemisticness occurs is incorrect if the trusteeship does not occur. sent13: the dropkicking nurse-midwife does not occur if the unpaidness and the essay happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the share occurs.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the unpaidness does not occur and the essay happens.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the dropkicking nurse-midwife does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int3: the operation happens.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the dropkicking nurse-midwife occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__