that the bungee is not unsensational and it is not high-interest is correct.
sent1: the roofer is unsensational and it compromises hashish. sent2: the roofer is stubborn and it compromises bungee. sent3: something is high-interest if it is stubborn. sent4: if the roofer does sublime then it is high-interest. sent5: if that the roofer is high-interest is true then the bungee is not unsensational and it is not high-interest. sent6: if the hobbyist moves the Vernier does not compromise bungee and does not ambush bourbon.
sent2 -> int1: the roofer is stubborn.; sent3 -> int2: if the roofer is stubborn then it is high-interest.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the roofer is high-interest.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the bungee is not unsensational and not high-interest is false.
$hypothesis$ = that the bungee is not unsensational and it is not high-interest is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the roofer is unsensational and it compromises hashish. sent2: the roofer is stubborn and it compromises bungee. sent3: something is high-interest if it is stubborn. sent4: if the roofer does sublime then it is high-interest. sent5: if that the roofer is high-interest is true then the bungee is not unsensational and it is not high-interest. sent6: if the hobbyist moves the Vernier does not compromise bungee and does not ambush bourbon. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the roofer is stubborn.; sent3 -> int2: if the roofer is stubborn then it is high-interest.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the roofer is high-interest.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__