the outdoorsman is a bioluminescence.
sent1: that the Xhosa is both not non-thirsty and non-postglacial does not hold. sent2: the seismologist is a bioluminescence. sent3: the Xhosa is not thirsty if there exists something such that it does excise abdication and is a Volvox. sent4: the biggin does excise abdication. sent5: if something does excise Socinus then that it does not perplex Bolshevism and it does not excise rubefacient does not hold. sent6: the Xhosa excises abdication but it does not excise rubefacient if it does not perplex Bolshevism. sent7: something bodes. sent8: if that something is thirsty and a Volvox does not hold that it is not a Volvox hold. sent9: if the Xhosa does excise abdication and does not excise rubefacient the biggin does not excise abdication. sent10: that the trivet is a kind of a Volvox that does perplex Bolshevism is wrong. sent11: if the fact that something is a Volvox but it is not a kind of a bioluminescence is wrong it is a bioluminescence. sent12: the trivet does excise rubefacient and it perplexes Bolshevism if the Xhosa is not thirsty. sent13: if the trivet is not a lifeline the biggin is trapezoidal. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a ready or it is not a Bultmann or both then the trivet is not postglacial. sent15: The abdication does excise biggin. sent16: the biggin is a Volvox. sent17: the biggin is not postglacial if there exists something such that it is a Volvox or it does not excise abdication or both. sent18: if that something is a lifeline but not trapezoidal is not right it excises Socinus. sent19: if that something is not a Volvox and it does not excise abdication is not true it is not a kind of a lifeline. sent20: the outdoorsman is not a bioluminescence if there exists something such that that it excises rubefacient and does excise Socinus hold. sent21: the fact that something is not a Volvox and it does not excise abdication does not hold if it is thirsty. sent22: if the fact that the biggin does not perplex Bolshevism and does not excise rubefacient is not true then the notepad is thirsty. sent23: if something is a bioluminescence and/or does not excise Socinus that the outdoorsman is not postglacial is not incorrect. sent24: there exists something such that it is ready and/or not a Bultmann. sent25: something does excise abdication and/or is thirsty. sent26: something is a quibble or it is a leopard's-bane or both. sent27: the fact that something is a lifeline and is not trapezoidal is not right if it is not postglacial. sent28: the fact that the trivet does excise Socinus and is not trapezoidal is wrong. sent29: the outdoorsman is not a kind of a ready.
sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the biggin excises abdication and it is a kind of a Volvox.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does excise abdication and is a Volvox.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the Xhosa is not thirsty.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the trivet excises rubefacient and it perplexes Bolshevism.; int4 -> int5: the trivet does excise rubefacient.; sent18 -> int6: if that the fact that the trivet is a lifeline but it is not trapezoidal is not right is not wrong then that it excises Socinus hold.; sent27 -> int7: the fact that the trivet is a lifeline but it is not trapezoidal is false if the fact that it is not postglacial is true.; sent24 & sent14 -> int8: the fact that the trivet is not postglacial hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the trivet is a lifeline but it is not trapezoidal does not hold.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the trivet does excise Socinus is true.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the trivet excises rubefacient and does excise Socinus.; int11 -> int12: something does excise rubefacient and it does excise Socinus.; int12 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the outdoorsman is a bioluminescence.
sent11 -> int13: the outdoorsman is a kind of a bioluminescence if that it is a kind of a Volvox and it is not a bioluminescence is wrong.; sent8 -> int14: the biggin is not a kind of a Volvox if the fact that it is thirsty and it is a Volvox is not right.; sent28 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it excises Socinus and is non-trapezoidal is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the outdoorsman is a bioluminescence. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Xhosa is both not non-thirsty and non-postglacial does not hold. sent2: the seismologist is a bioluminescence. sent3: the Xhosa is not thirsty if there exists something such that it does excise abdication and is a Volvox. sent4: the biggin does excise abdication. sent5: if something does excise Socinus then that it does not perplex Bolshevism and it does not excise rubefacient does not hold. sent6: the Xhosa excises abdication but it does not excise rubefacient if it does not perplex Bolshevism. sent7: something bodes. sent8: if that something is thirsty and a Volvox does not hold that it is not a Volvox hold. sent9: if the Xhosa does excise abdication and does not excise rubefacient the biggin does not excise abdication. sent10: that the trivet is a kind of a Volvox that does perplex Bolshevism is wrong. sent11: if the fact that something is a Volvox but it is not a kind of a bioluminescence is wrong it is a bioluminescence. sent12: the trivet does excise rubefacient and it perplexes Bolshevism if the Xhosa is not thirsty. sent13: if the trivet is not a lifeline the biggin is trapezoidal. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a ready or it is not a Bultmann or both then the trivet is not postglacial. sent15: The abdication does excise biggin. sent16: the biggin is a Volvox. sent17: the biggin is not postglacial if there exists something such that it is a Volvox or it does not excise abdication or both. sent18: if that something is a lifeline but not trapezoidal is not right it excises Socinus. sent19: if that something is not a Volvox and it does not excise abdication is not true it is not a kind of a lifeline. sent20: the outdoorsman is not a bioluminescence if there exists something such that that it excises rubefacient and does excise Socinus hold. sent21: the fact that something is not a Volvox and it does not excise abdication does not hold if it is thirsty. sent22: if the fact that the biggin does not perplex Bolshevism and does not excise rubefacient is not true then the notepad is thirsty. sent23: if something is a bioluminescence and/or does not excise Socinus that the outdoorsman is not postglacial is not incorrect. sent24: there exists something such that it is ready and/or not a Bultmann. sent25: something does excise abdication and/or is thirsty. sent26: something is a quibble or it is a leopard's-bane or both. sent27: the fact that something is a lifeline and is not trapezoidal is not right if it is not postglacial. sent28: the fact that the trivet does excise Socinus and is not trapezoidal is wrong. sent29: the outdoorsman is not a kind of a ready. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent16 -> int1: the biggin excises abdication and it is a kind of a Volvox.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it does excise abdication and is a Volvox.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the Xhosa is not thirsty.; int3 & sent12 -> int4: the trivet excises rubefacient and it perplexes Bolshevism.; int4 -> int5: the trivet does excise rubefacient.; sent18 -> int6: if that the fact that the trivet is a lifeline but it is not trapezoidal is not right is not wrong then that it excises Socinus hold.; sent27 -> int7: the fact that the trivet is a lifeline but it is not trapezoidal is false if the fact that it is not postglacial is true.; sent24 & sent14 -> int8: the fact that the trivet is not postglacial hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the trivet is a lifeline but it is not trapezoidal does not hold.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the trivet does excise Socinus is true.; int5 & int10 -> int11: the trivet excises rubefacient and does excise Socinus.; int11 -> int12: something does excise rubefacient and it does excise Socinus.; int12 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__