there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a parturiency then that it is not decisive and it is not a kind of a Romansh does not hold.
sent1: that something is indecisive but it is not a Romansh does not hold if that it is a kind of a parturiency is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that something is not a haircut hold that it is toeless thing that is not Laputan does not hold. sent3: if something is not a parturiency it is not decisive and it is not a Romansh. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a parturiency the fact that that it is indecisive and it is not a kind of a Romansh is true does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does not truss blended is true the fact that that it is scalic thing that is not a quarterstaff hold is not true. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a parturiency then it is indecisive thing that is not a kind of a Romansh. sent7: that the courthouse is both indecisive and not a Romansh is incorrect if it is a parturiency. sent8: if something is not a parturiency that it is indecisive and it is a kind of a Romansh is not true. sent9: that something is albuminuric thing that is not a wakeboard is not true if it is non-regimental. sent10: there is something such that if it does not taste prattler then the fact that it is pretentious and it is not a kind of a relatedness is not correct. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a parturiency the fact that it is not decisive but Romansh is not correct hold. sent12: that the courthouse is indecisive and is not the Romansh if the courthouse is not a parturiency hold. sent13: that something does truss blackface and is not phonics is incorrect if that it does not taste lobby is correct. sent14: if the courthouse is not a kind of a parturiency then that it is indecisive and it is a kind of a Romansh does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not parhelic then the fact that it trusses bantamweight and it is not a Trichoptera is wrong. sent16: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a scalpel then that it tastes campstool and is not nonpsychoactive is false hold. sent17: that something is both myrmecophytic and not a Romneya is not correct if it is not a kind of a Postum. sent18: there is something such that if it does not taste twitterer then the fact that it is absolute and it is not seedless is incorrect. sent19: that the denaturant is both a parturiency and not a Romneya is incorrect if it is not a croupier.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a parturiency then that it is not decisive and it is not a kind of a Romansh does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is indecisive but it is not a Romansh does not hold if that it is a kind of a parturiency is not wrong. sent2: if the fact that something is not a haircut hold that it is toeless thing that is not Laputan does not hold. sent3: if something is not a parturiency it is not decisive and it is not a Romansh. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a parturiency the fact that that it is indecisive and it is not a kind of a Romansh is true does not hold. sent5: there is something such that if the fact that it does not truss blended is true the fact that that it is scalic thing that is not a quarterstaff hold is not true. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a parturiency then it is indecisive thing that is not a kind of a Romansh. sent7: that the courthouse is both indecisive and not a Romansh is incorrect if it is a parturiency. sent8: if something is not a parturiency that it is indecisive and it is a kind of a Romansh is not true. sent9: that something is albuminuric thing that is not a wakeboard is not true if it is non-regimental. sent10: there is something such that if it does not taste prattler then the fact that it is pretentious and it is not a kind of a relatedness is not correct. sent11: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a parturiency the fact that it is not decisive but Romansh is not correct hold. sent12: that the courthouse is indecisive and is not the Romansh if the courthouse is not a parturiency hold. sent13: that something does truss blackface and is not phonics is incorrect if that it does not taste lobby is correct. sent14: if the courthouse is not a kind of a parturiency then that it is indecisive and it is a kind of a Romansh does not hold. sent15: there exists something such that if it is not parhelic then the fact that it trusses bantamweight and it is not a Trichoptera is wrong. sent16: the fact that there is something such that if it is not a kind of a scalpel then that it tastes campstool and is not nonpsychoactive is false hold. sent17: that something is both myrmecophytic and not a Romneya is not correct if it is not a kind of a Postum. sent18: there is something such that if it does not taste twitterer then the fact that it is absolute and it is not seedless is incorrect. sent19: that the denaturant is both a parturiency and not a Romneya is incorrect if it is not a croupier. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__