that if the trapezoid is not a kind of a strings the bise is not a auriculare and/or it does smock Shina is not true.
sent1: the hangover is not a kind of a Tytonidae if the fact that the bise is a kind of a Congregationalist that is apicultural is not correct. sent2: if the bise is not a Tytonidae the hangover is exact. sent3: that the trapezoid is a kind of a strings is not false if the hangover is not a kind of a Tytonidae. sent4: the bise is a kind of a auriculare or does smock Shina or both. sent5: the bise is not a strings and/or it does smock Shina. sent6: the hangover is a Congregationalist or it smocks Shina or both if it is a Tytonidae. sent7: if the bise does string it smocks Shina or it is a kind of a auriculare or both. sent8: an exact thing either is a auriculare or does smock Shina or both. sent9: the bise is not a strings. sent10: the bise is a auriculare and/or it smocks Shina if the trapezoid is not a kind of a strings. sent11: if the trapezoid is a strings then the bise is not a auriculare or it smocks Shina or both. sent12: something is not a auriculare or it smocks Shina or both if it is exact. sent13: the fact that the hangover smocks Shina and it is a auriculare is wrong if it is not a Tytonidae. sent14: if the bise is not exact that it does smock Shina and is a strings is not right. sent15: the Converso is not exact. sent16: if the bise is exact then either it is a auriculare or it smocks Shina or both. sent17: if the bise is not apicultural then the hangover is not a Tytonidae. sent18: if the bise is not exact then that it is a Congregationalist and it is apicultural does not hold. sent19: the hangover is not terrestrial.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bise is not exact.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: that the bise is a Congregationalist and it is apicultural is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the hangover is not a Tytonidae hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the trapezoid is a strings.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trapezoid does not string.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the bise is exact.; sent12 -> int6: the bise either is not a kind of a auriculare or does smock Shina or both if it is exact.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bise is not a auriculare and/or it does smock Shina.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that if the trapezoid is not a kind of a strings the bise is not a auriculare and/or it does smock Shina is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the hangover is not a kind of a Tytonidae if the fact that the bise is a kind of a Congregationalist that is apicultural is not correct. sent2: if the bise is not a Tytonidae the hangover is exact. sent3: that the trapezoid is a kind of a strings is not false if the hangover is not a kind of a Tytonidae. sent4: the bise is a kind of a auriculare or does smock Shina or both. sent5: the bise is not a strings and/or it does smock Shina. sent6: the hangover is a Congregationalist or it smocks Shina or both if it is a Tytonidae. sent7: if the bise does string it smocks Shina or it is a kind of a auriculare or both. sent8: an exact thing either is a auriculare or does smock Shina or both. sent9: the bise is not a strings. sent10: the bise is a auriculare and/or it smocks Shina if the trapezoid is not a kind of a strings. sent11: if the trapezoid is a strings then the bise is not a auriculare or it smocks Shina or both. sent12: something is not a auriculare or it smocks Shina or both if it is exact. sent13: the fact that the hangover smocks Shina and it is a auriculare is wrong if it is not a Tytonidae. sent14: if the bise is not exact that it does smock Shina and is a strings is not right. sent15: the Converso is not exact. sent16: if the bise is exact then either it is a auriculare or it smocks Shina or both. sent17: if the bise is not apicultural then the hangover is not a Tytonidae. sent18: if the bise is not exact then that it is a Congregationalist and it is apicultural does not hold. sent19: the hangover is not terrestrial. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the bise is not exact.; sent18 & assump2 -> int1: that the bise is a Congregationalist and it is apicultural is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: that the hangover is not a Tytonidae hold.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the trapezoid is a strings.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trapezoid does not string.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the bise is exact.; sent12 -> int6: the bise either is not a kind of a auriculare or does smock Shina or both if it is exact.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the bise is not a auriculare and/or it does smock Shina.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__