the vulnerableness happens.
sent1: if the unobjectionableness happens the postprandialness does not occur. sent2: the recce does not occur and the tabularness does not occur if the vulnerableness occurs. sent3: that the vulnerableness does not occur and the meeting troublesomeness does not occur is triggered by that the aliveness happens. sent4: the irruption does not occur and the healthfulness does not occur. sent5: the intolerableness does not occur and the seeking Aeonium happens. sent6: if the stunt occurs not the seeking absenteeism but the meeting cuppa occurs. sent7: the tabularness does not occur. sent8: the nautch does not occur if the seeking quintessence occurs. sent9: the stunting occurs. sent10: the meeting weave does not occur and the conic does not occur. sent11: the aliveness does not occur if that the seeking absenteeism does not occur hold. sent12: the anosmicness does not occur. sent13: the meeting Napier happens. sent14: the seeking Mallarme does not occur. sent15: the intolerableness does not occur. sent16: that the recce does not occur brings about that the meeting cuppa does not occur and the aliveness does not occur. sent17: the seeking absenteeism does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vulnerableness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the recce does not occur and the tabularness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the recce does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the meeting cuppa does not occur and the aliveness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the meeting cuppa does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int5: not the seeking absenteeism but the meeting cuppa occurs.; int5 -> int6: that the meeting cuppa occurs hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the vulnerableness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the vulnerableness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the unobjectionableness happens the postprandialness does not occur. sent2: the recce does not occur and the tabularness does not occur if the vulnerableness occurs. sent3: that the vulnerableness does not occur and the meeting troublesomeness does not occur is triggered by that the aliveness happens. sent4: the irruption does not occur and the healthfulness does not occur. sent5: the intolerableness does not occur and the seeking Aeonium happens. sent6: if the stunt occurs not the seeking absenteeism but the meeting cuppa occurs. sent7: the tabularness does not occur. sent8: the nautch does not occur if the seeking quintessence occurs. sent9: the stunting occurs. sent10: the meeting weave does not occur and the conic does not occur. sent11: the aliveness does not occur if that the seeking absenteeism does not occur hold. sent12: the anosmicness does not occur. sent13: the meeting Napier happens. sent14: the seeking Mallarme does not occur. sent15: the intolerableness does not occur. sent16: that the recce does not occur brings about that the meeting cuppa does not occur and the aliveness does not occur. sent17: the seeking absenteeism does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the vulnerableness occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the recce does not occur and the tabularness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the recce does not occur.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the meeting cuppa does not occur and the aliveness does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the meeting cuppa does not occur.; sent6 & sent9 -> int5: not the seeking absenteeism but the meeting cuppa occurs.; int5 -> int6: that the meeting cuppa occurs hold.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__