either the directing occurs or the incurvating does not occur or both.
sent1: the pitching triolein occurs and the tyrannicide occurs if the invariableness does not occur. sent2: if that the revue does not occur but the powwowing tidbit happens is wrong the revue occurs. sent3: that the non-noness and the squeegeeing ballade occurs is not correct. sent4: if that both the non-noness and the squeegeeing ballade occurs is incorrect the noness occurs. sent5: that the invariableness happens is prevented by that the benzoicness happens and the tetragonalness occurs. sent6: the fact that the noness happens and the squeegeeing ballade occurs is incorrect. sent7: the noness does not occur if the incurvating does not occur. sent8: if the similarness does not occur the powwowing herpetologist and the argumentativeness happens. sent9: the fact that not the skiing but the beat happens is incorrect. sent10: if the gambling happens then the affixation does not occur. sent11: if the raftering babytalk occurs the similarness does not occur and the raftering abutter happens. sent12: that not the antitypicness but the brahminicness occurs is wrong. sent13: if the countersubversion happens the incurvating does not occur and the noness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the invariableness does not occur is not incorrect. sent15: that the steadiedness does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the benzoicness happens. sent17: the tetragonalness happens. sent18: if the steadying does not occur that the raftering babytalk occurs is right. sent19: the no happens if the incurvating does not occur. sent20: if the directing occurs then the no does not occur. sent21: the powwowing sertraline does not occur if the powwowing herpetologist happens and the pitching triolein occurs. sent22: that the powwowing sertraline does not occur brings about the powwowing Chlorophthalmidae and/or that the squeegeeing ballade does not occur. sent23: the fact that either the ostomy happens or the squeegeeing rictus does not occur or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the directness happens and/or the incurvating does not occur.; assump1 & sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the no does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the no happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the directing happens and/or the incurvating does not occur.
sent18 & sent15 -> int4: the raftering babytalk occurs.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the similarness does not occur but the raftering abutter happens is true.; int5 -> int6: the similarness does not occur.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the powwowing herpetologist happens and the argumentativeness happens.; int7 -> int8: the powwowing herpetologist occurs.; sent16 & sent17 -> int9: both the benzoicness and the tetragonalness happens.; sent5 & int9 -> int10: the invariableness does not occur.; sent1 & int10 -> int11: the fact that both the pitching triolein and the tyrannicide happens hold.; int11 -> int12: the pitching triolein happens.; int8 & int12 -> int13: both the powwowing herpetologist and the pitching triolein occurs.; sent21 & int13 -> int14: the powwowing sertraline does not occur.; sent22 & int14 -> int15: the powwowing Chlorophthalmidae occurs or the squeegeeing ballade does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = either the directing occurs or the incurvating does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the pitching triolein occurs and the tyrannicide occurs if the invariableness does not occur. sent2: if that the revue does not occur but the powwowing tidbit happens is wrong the revue occurs. sent3: that the non-noness and the squeegeeing ballade occurs is not correct. sent4: if that both the non-noness and the squeegeeing ballade occurs is incorrect the noness occurs. sent5: that the invariableness happens is prevented by that the benzoicness happens and the tetragonalness occurs. sent6: the fact that the noness happens and the squeegeeing ballade occurs is incorrect. sent7: the noness does not occur if the incurvating does not occur. sent8: if the similarness does not occur the powwowing herpetologist and the argumentativeness happens. sent9: the fact that not the skiing but the beat happens is incorrect. sent10: if the gambling happens then the affixation does not occur. sent11: if the raftering babytalk occurs the similarness does not occur and the raftering abutter happens. sent12: that not the antitypicness but the brahminicness occurs is wrong. sent13: if the countersubversion happens the incurvating does not occur and the noness does not occur. sent14: the fact that the invariableness does not occur is not incorrect. sent15: that the steadiedness does not occur is not wrong. sent16: the benzoicness happens. sent17: the tetragonalness happens. sent18: if the steadying does not occur that the raftering babytalk occurs is right. sent19: the no happens if the incurvating does not occur. sent20: if the directing occurs then the no does not occur. sent21: the powwowing sertraline does not occur if the powwowing herpetologist happens and the pitching triolein occurs. sent22: that the powwowing sertraline does not occur brings about the powwowing Chlorophthalmidae and/or that the squeegeeing ballade does not occur. sent23: the fact that either the ostomy happens or the squeegeeing rictus does not occur or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the directness happens and/or the incurvating does not occur.; assump1 & sent20 & sent7 -> int1: the no does not occur.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the no happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__