the boy is not a bazaar.
sent1: if something that does not awe fluvastatin is stomatous then it is not Hasidic. sent2: the teddy is not a wonder if that the pantothen is not crucial and does not presume is not wrong. sent3: the store is crucial if there exists something such that it is Hasidic. sent4: there is something such that it does sap. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of stabling thing that is not a howl is not true then it is not a kind of a stabling. sent6: that something is a bazaar but it is not a sap is false if it is not stabling. sent7: if that the store is not stabling but it is Hasidic is not true the mortgagee howls. sent8: if there is something such that it does sap then that the store is not stabling and is Hasidic is incorrect. sent9: that the fact that the mortgagee presumes or is not crucial or both does not hold hold. sent10: if the pantothen is not a kind of a travel then it is non-crucial thing that does not presume. sent11: that the teddy does not howl hold. sent12: if the teddy is not a kind of a wonder then the boy is not a kind of a bazaar and it is not doctrinal. sent13: if that the store is a bazaar that is not a sap is incorrect that the boy is a bazaar hold. sent14: a sap is stomatous. sent15: the fact that the store does not awe fluvastatin but it is stomatous is true if it is not a travel. sent16: if something is not Hasidic then the fact that that it is a stabling and it is not a kind of a howl is not false is false. sent17: if that the pantothen is not stomatous or it awes fluvastatin or both is not true then it does not travel. sent18: the boy is a howl if the mortgagee is doctrinal. sent19: the pantothen is not stomatous if that it is not a bazaar and/or it does awe fluvastatin is not correct. sent20: the boy is not doctrinal if that it is a wonder and/or it is Hasidic is incorrect. sent21: the pantothen is not a bazaar if the boy is not a kind of a travel but it is crucial.
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the store is a kind of non-stabling thing that is Hasidic does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the mortgagee is a kind of a howl.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it howls.;
the fluvastatin is stomatous.
sent14 -> int4: if the fluvastatin saps then it is stomatous.;
$hypothesis$ = the boy is not a bazaar. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not awe fluvastatin is stomatous then it is not Hasidic. sent2: the teddy is not a wonder if that the pantothen is not crucial and does not presume is not wrong. sent3: the store is crucial if there exists something such that it is Hasidic. sent4: there is something such that it does sap. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of stabling thing that is not a howl is not true then it is not a kind of a stabling. sent6: that something is a bazaar but it is not a sap is false if it is not stabling. sent7: if that the store is not stabling but it is Hasidic is not true the mortgagee howls. sent8: if there is something such that it does sap then that the store is not stabling and is Hasidic is incorrect. sent9: that the fact that the mortgagee presumes or is not crucial or both does not hold hold. sent10: if the pantothen is not a kind of a travel then it is non-crucial thing that does not presume. sent11: that the teddy does not howl hold. sent12: if the teddy is not a kind of a wonder then the boy is not a kind of a bazaar and it is not doctrinal. sent13: if that the store is a bazaar that is not a sap is incorrect that the boy is a bazaar hold. sent14: a sap is stomatous. sent15: the fact that the store does not awe fluvastatin but it is stomatous is true if it is not a travel. sent16: if something is not Hasidic then the fact that that it is a stabling and it is not a kind of a howl is not false is false. sent17: if that the pantothen is not stomatous or it awes fluvastatin or both is not true then it does not travel. sent18: the boy is a howl if the mortgagee is doctrinal. sent19: the pantothen is not stomatous if that it is not a bazaar and/or it does awe fluvastatin is not correct. sent20: the boy is not doctrinal if that it is a wonder and/or it is Hasidic is incorrect. sent21: the pantothen is not a bazaar if the boy is not a kind of a travel but it is crucial. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent8 -> int1: the fact that the store is a kind of non-stabling thing that is Hasidic does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the mortgagee is a kind of a howl.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it howls.; __UNKNOWN__