the modernist does not rewrite rose.
sent1: if there exists something such that it is both not a iodocompound and unidimensional then the cutout does rewrite modernist. sent2: the Tajik is gutsy. sent3: if there is something such that it is not gutsy and it does not rewrite Tajik the Tajik is a iodocompound. sent4: if the modernist is unidimensional and it rewrites modernist then it does not rewrite rose. sent5: if the Tajik is a kind of a iodocompound the modernist rewrites modernist. sent6: the modernist is unidimensional. sent7: something is not gutsy and it does not rewrite Tajik.
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the Tajik is a kind of a iodocompound.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the modernist rewrites modernist.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the modernist is unidimensional and it rewrites modernist is not incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the cutout does rewrite modernist hold.
$hypothesis$ = the modernist does not rewrite rose. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that it is both not a iodocompound and unidimensional then the cutout does rewrite modernist. sent2: the Tajik is gutsy. sent3: if there is something such that it is not gutsy and it does not rewrite Tajik the Tajik is a iodocompound. sent4: if the modernist is unidimensional and it rewrites modernist then it does not rewrite rose. sent5: if the Tajik is a kind of a iodocompound the modernist rewrites modernist. sent6: the modernist is unidimensional. sent7: something is not gutsy and it does not rewrite Tajik. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent3 -> int1: the Tajik is a kind of a iodocompound.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the modernist rewrites modernist.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: that the modernist is unidimensional and it rewrites modernist is not incorrect.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__