either the ciderpress is not a Mitterrand or it does not expand or both.
sent1: the Hero does exsiccate Peter. sent2: something is not livable or is an accessory or both if the fact that it exsiccates Peter is true. sent3: if something is not disjunctive then it does not rap ropewalk and is a kind of a internuncio. sent4: if the homosexuality does not rap ropewalk the pennon does not rap ropewalk and/or it is a Mitterrand. sent5: the ciderpress is not a Mitterrand and/or does not expand if the pennon is not a Mitterrand. sent6: if the Hero is not livable and/or is an accessory it is an accessory. sent7: the tunaburger does sport and it does expand. sent8: if the fact that the tailstock is nonspatial and/or it is not a internuncio is incorrect the homosexuality is a internuncio. sent9: if the tunaburger is a kind of non-amphoteric thing that does sport the homosexuality raps ropewalk. sent10: the Conservative does decorate and is nonindustrial. sent11: the tailstock is not amphoteric and/or it is not non-peaty. sent12: The Peter does exsiccate Hero. sent13: if the Hero is disjunctive and an accessory the pennon is not a Mitterrand. sent14: the tailstock is not a internuncio or amphoteric or both. sent15: the ciderpress raps ropewalk and it is a Mitterrand. sent16: the Hero is not disjunctive or expands or both. sent17: the tunaburger is not amphoteric and does sport. sent18: the fact that something is not a Mitterrand and/or it does not expand is not true if the fact that it is a kind of a internuncio hold. sent19: if the tailstock is not amphoteric or it is nonspatial or both it is nonspatial. sent20: the tunaburger is not non-disjunctive if it is not spatial and it is unlivable. sent21: the fact that the tailstock is nonspatial and/or it is not a internuncio is false. sent22: the tunaburger is a kind of a sporting that is an accessory. sent23: the ciderpress does not expand and/or it is an accessory if that the Hero does not expand is true. sent24: if something raps ropewalk and it is a internuncio the Hero is disjunctive. sent25: if the Hero is disjunctive then it does not exsiccate Peter and/or does expand. sent26: if there is something such that it is a kind of a internuncio either the ferrimagnetism does not expand or it is not nonindustrial or both. sent27: the ciderpress is not disjunctive if the tunaburger is both disjunctive and an accessory. sent28: the tunaburger is not a sporting and/or is a kind of a internuncio if it is an accessory.
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: that the homosexuality raps ropewalk is not false.; sent8 & sent21 -> int2: the homosexuality is a internuncio.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the homosexuality does rap ropewalk and it is a kind of a internuncio.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it raps ropewalk and it is a kind of a internuncio is right.; int4 & sent24 -> int5: the Hero is disjunctive.; sent2 -> int6: either the Hero is not livable or it is a kind of an accessory or both if it exsiccates Peter.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Hero is unlivable and/or it is an accessory.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the Hero is an accessory is right.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the Hero is both not non-disjunctive and an accessory.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the pennon is not a Mitterrand.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the ferrimagnetism does not expand and/or is not nonindustrial.
$hypothesis$ = either the ciderpress is not a Mitterrand or it does not expand or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the Hero does exsiccate Peter. sent2: something is not livable or is an accessory or both if the fact that it exsiccates Peter is true. sent3: if something is not disjunctive then it does not rap ropewalk and is a kind of a internuncio. sent4: if the homosexuality does not rap ropewalk the pennon does not rap ropewalk and/or it is a Mitterrand. sent5: the ciderpress is not a Mitterrand and/or does not expand if the pennon is not a Mitterrand. sent6: if the Hero is not livable and/or is an accessory it is an accessory. sent7: the tunaburger does sport and it does expand. sent8: if the fact that the tailstock is nonspatial and/or it is not a internuncio is incorrect the homosexuality is a internuncio. sent9: if the tunaburger is a kind of non-amphoteric thing that does sport the homosexuality raps ropewalk. sent10: the Conservative does decorate and is nonindustrial. sent11: the tailstock is not amphoteric and/or it is not non-peaty. sent12: The Peter does exsiccate Hero. sent13: if the Hero is disjunctive and an accessory the pennon is not a Mitterrand. sent14: the tailstock is not a internuncio or amphoteric or both. sent15: the ciderpress raps ropewalk and it is a Mitterrand. sent16: the Hero is not disjunctive or expands or both. sent17: the tunaburger is not amphoteric and does sport. sent18: the fact that something is not a Mitterrand and/or it does not expand is not true if the fact that it is a kind of a internuncio hold. sent19: if the tailstock is not amphoteric or it is nonspatial or both it is nonspatial. sent20: the tunaburger is not non-disjunctive if it is not spatial and it is unlivable. sent21: the fact that the tailstock is nonspatial and/or it is not a internuncio is false. sent22: the tunaburger is a kind of a sporting that is an accessory. sent23: the ciderpress does not expand and/or it is an accessory if that the Hero does not expand is true. sent24: if something raps ropewalk and it is a internuncio the Hero is disjunctive. sent25: if the Hero is disjunctive then it does not exsiccate Peter and/or does expand. sent26: if there is something such that it is a kind of a internuncio either the ferrimagnetism does not expand or it is not nonindustrial or both. sent27: the ciderpress is not disjunctive if the tunaburger is both disjunctive and an accessory. sent28: the tunaburger is not a sporting and/or is a kind of a internuncio if it is an accessory. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent17 -> int1: that the homosexuality raps ropewalk is not false.; sent8 & sent21 -> int2: the homosexuality is a internuncio.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the homosexuality does rap ropewalk and it is a kind of a internuncio.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that the fact that it raps ropewalk and it is a kind of a internuncio is right.; int4 & sent24 -> int5: the Hero is disjunctive.; sent2 -> int6: either the Hero is not livable or it is a kind of an accessory or both if it exsiccates Peter.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the Hero is unlivable and/or it is an accessory.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: that the Hero is an accessory is right.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the Hero is both not non-disjunctive and an accessory.; int9 & sent13 -> int10: the pennon is not a Mitterrand.; int10 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__