that the insider is not pyrographic or it is not an immune or both is not right if the mollie is a stanchion.
sent1: the insider is an immune if the Calla is not a kind of an immune. sent2: if the mollie is a stanchion the Calla is a greasiness. sent3: the insider is not pyrographic and/or is not a kind of an immune. sent4: the fact that the henna is provident is true. sent5: the fact that either the mollie is not a kind of a stanchion or it is pyrographic or both does not hold if the insider is not a stanchion. sent6: the insider is pyrographic if the mollie is a stanchion. sent7: the insider is not pyrographic and/or it is not an immune if the mollie is a stanchion. sent8: if the fact that the henna is a greasiness is true then that either the Calla is not pyrographic or it is not provident or both is wrong. sent9: the fact that the insider is not pyrographic or it is not immune or both is not true if the henna is not pyrographic. sent10: the decomposition is not provident if the Calla is a kind of a greasiness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mollie is a stanchion.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Calla is a kind of a greasiness.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the decomposition is not provident.;
$hypothesis$ = that the insider is not pyrographic or it is not an immune or both is not right if the mollie is a stanchion. ; $context$ = sent1: the insider is an immune if the Calla is not a kind of an immune. sent2: if the mollie is a stanchion the Calla is a greasiness. sent3: the insider is not pyrographic and/or is not a kind of an immune. sent4: the fact that the henna is provident is true. sent5: the fact that either the mollie is not a kind of a stanchion or it is pyrographic or both does not hold if the insider is not a stanchion. sent6: the insider is pyrographic if the mollie is a stanchion. sent7: the insider is not pyrographic and/or it is not an immune if the mollie is a stanchion. sent8: if the fact that the henna is a greasiness is true then that either the Calla is not pyrographic or it is not provident or both is wrong. sent9: the fact that the insider is not pyrographic or it is not immune or both is not true if the henna is not pyrographic. sent10: the decomposition is not provident if the Calla is a kind of a greasiness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mollie is a stanchion.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the Calla is a kind of a greasiness.; sent10 & int1 -> int2: the decomposition is not provident.; __UNKNOWN__