that the lakeside is not a trompillo but it is a dogleg is true.
sent1: the fact that the lakeside is both a trompillo and a dogleg is not correct. sent2: the lakeside does confine beaver. sent3: the lakeside is not a kind of a dogleg if the devisor does persist play and is not a kind of a trompillo. sent4: if the lakeside is not a dogleg then that the harpulla confines beaver and it is a wristlet hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a wristlet then the devisor does confine beaver and it is bumpy. sent6: the lakeside is not a wristlet if it does confine beaver and it is bumpy. sent7: the lakeside is bumpy. sent8: the fact that the lakeside is not a trompillo but it is a kind of a dogleg is not right if it is not a kind of a wristlet. sent9: The beaver does confine lakeside.
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the lakeside does confine beaver and is not non-bumpy.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the lakeside is not a wristlet.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the lakeside is not a trompillo but a dogleg.
$hypothesis$ = that the lakeside is not a trompillo but it is a dogleg is true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the lakeside is both a trompillo and a dogleg is not correct. sent2: the lakeside does confine beaver. sent3: the lakeside is not a kind of a dogleg if the devisor does persist play and is not a kind of a trompillo. sent4: if the lakeside is not a dogleg then that the harpulla confines beaver and it is a wristlet hold. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a wristlet then the devisor does confine beaver and it is bumpy. sent6: the lakeside is not a wristlet if it does confine beaver and it is bumpy. sent7: the lakeside is bumpy. sent8: the fact that the lakeside is not a trompillo but it is a kind of a dogleg is not right if it is not a kind of a wristlet. sent9: The beaver does confine lakeside. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent7 -> int1: the lakeside does confine beaver and is not non-bumpy.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the lakeside is not a wristlet.; int2 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__