the palatine does not housekeep chili.
sent1: if the fact that the brainworker does not prod sheep-tick but it is a marriage does not hold the pfannkuchen justifies obedience. sent2: the pfannkuchen does housekeep chili and is a marriage. sent3: the pfannkuchen relaces cockle and/or it does not relace dracontium. sent4: the fact that the brainworker does not prod sheep-tick is not incorrect. sent5: something does not housekeep perfume if it does not housekeep blacktop. sent6: the fact that the brainworker does not housekeep blacktop but it is a mimosa does not hold. sent7: The fact that the sheep-tick does not prod brainworker is not incorrect. sent8: if the pfannkuchen housekeeps blacktop then it housekeeps perfume. sent9: the palatine prods sheep-tick if that the pfannkuchen does not justify obedience but it does housekeep chili does not hold. sent10: there is something such that that it relaces cockle is not wrong. sent11: the palatine does housekeep chili if something that housekeeps perfume justifies obedience. sent12: the pfannkuchen does justify obedience. sent13: the palatine does accede if the fact that the pfannkuchen is not a kind of a marriage and does housekeep chili is not right. sent14: if that something does prod sheep-tick or it housekeeps blacktop or both is not correct then it does not housekeep chili. sent15: that the pfannkuchen does not accede but it is a kind of a marriage is incorrect if it does not housekeep blacktop. sent16: The obedience does justify pfannkuchen. sent17: if something that does housekeep chili housekeeps perfume then the pfannkuchen does prod sheep-tick. sent18: if something does not prod sheep-tick and does not justify obedience then it does not housekeep blacktop. sent19: if that the pfannkuchen does not accede and is a marriage is false then the brainworker prods sheep-tick. sent20: the palatine is not a kind of a marriage. sent21: the fact that the pfannkuchen does not justify obedience but it is a marriage is not correct if it does not prod sheep-tick. sent22: there exists something such that it does justify obedience. sent23: there exists something such that the fact that it prods sheep-tick and it is a marriage is correct. sent24: the brainworker is a promoter and accedes. sent25: the palatine does not housekeep blacktop.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pfannkuchen does not housekeep blacktop.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that the pfannkuchen does not accede but it is a marriage is not true.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the brainworker does prod sheep-tick.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pfannkuchen housekeeps blacktop.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the pfannkuchen housekeeps perfume.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the pfannkuchen housekeeps perfume and justifies obedience.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it housekeeps perfume and it justifies obedience.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the chili does not housekeep perfume.
sent5 -> int8: the chili does not housekeep perfume if it does not housekeep blacktop.; sent18 -> int9: the chili does not housekeep blacktop if it does not prod sheep-tick and does not justify obedience.; sent3 -> int10: something relaces cockle and/or it does not relace dracontium.;
$hypothesis$ = the palatine does not housekeep chili. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the brainworker does not prod sheep-tick but it is a marriage does not hold the pfannkuchen justifies obedience. sent2: the pfannkuchen does housekeep chili and is a marriage. sent3: the pfannkuchen relaces cockle and/or it does not relace dracontium. sent4: the fact that the brainworker does not prod sheep-tick is not incorrect. sent5: something does not housekeep perfume if it does not housekeep blacktop. sent6: the fact that the brainworker does not housekeep blacktop but it is a mimosa does not hold. sent7: The fact that the sheep-tick does not prod brainworker is not incorrect. sent8: if the pfannkuchen housekeeps blacktop then it housekeeps perfume. sent9: the palatine prods sheep-tick if that the pfannkuchen does not justify obedience but it does housekeep chili does not hold. sent10: there is something such that that it relaces cockle is not wrong. sent11: the palatine does housekeep chili if something that housekeeps perfume justifies obedience. sent12: the pfannkuchen does justify obedience. sent13: the palatine does accede if the fact that the pfannkuchen is not a kind of a marriage and does housekeep chili is not right. sent14: if that something does prod sheep-tick or it housekeeps blacktop or both is not correct then it does not housekeep chili. sent15: that the pfannkuchen does not accede but it is a kind of a marriage is incorrect if it does not housekeep blacktop. sent16: The obedience does justify pfannkuchen. sent17: if something that does housekeep chili housekeeps perfume then the pfannkuchen does prod sheep-tick. sent18: if something does not prod sheep-tick and does not justify obedience then it does not housekeep blacktop. sent19: if that the pfannkuchen does not accede and is a marriage is false then the brainworker prods sheep-tick. sent20: the palatine is not a kind of a marriage. sent21: the fact that the pfannkuchen does not justify obedience but it is a marriage is not correct if it does not prod sheep-tick. sent22: there exists something such that it does justify obedience. sent23: there exists something such that the fact that it prods sheep-tick and it is a marriage is correct. sent24: the brainworker is a promoter and accedes. sent25: the palatine does not housekeep blacktop. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pfannkuchen does not housekeep blacktop.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: that the pfannkuchen does not accede but it is a marriage is not true.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the brainworker does prod sheep-tick.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the pfannkuchen housekeeps blacktop.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the pfannkuchen housekeeps perfume.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the pfannkuchen housekeeps perfume and justifies obedience.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it housekeeps perfume and it justifies obedience.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__