if the resuscitator does neglect rentier then the hoist is not a hackberry.
sent1: if a passable thing is not fearful it is non-funerary. sent2: the resuscitator does not neglect rentier if the rentier is both not an animist and interdisciplinary. sent3: the hoist is not a kind of a hackberry if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of passable thing that is not fearful does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the resuscitator does neglect rentier hold.; sent1 -> int1: the easel is not funerary if it is a kind of passable thing that is not fearful.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the easel is passable and not fearful.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: that the easel is not funerary is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = if the resuscitator does neglect rentier then the hoist is not a hackberry. ; $context$ = sent1: if a passable thing is not fearful it is non-funerary. sent2: the resuscitator does not neglect rentier if the rentier is both not an animist and interdisciplinary. sent3: the hoist is not a kind of a hackberry if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of passable thing that is not fearful does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the resuscitator does neglect rentier hold.; sent1 -> int1: the easel is not funerary if it is a kind of passable thing that is not fearful.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the easel is passable and not fearful.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: that the easel is not funerary is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__