the trazodone is not a terrier but it does interpret.
sent1: if something is a polka that it is not a niceness and it is not non-gemmiferous does not hold. sent2: the disposable is a polka and it undercuts tilefish if there exists something such that it is not armorial. sent3: the knee-high is a swiftlet that is a niceness. sent4: the knee-high does not polka. sent5: the knee-high is not carnivorous if the fact that there exists something such that it is a terrier and does not disapprove statics is not false. sent6: if the knee-high is not carnivorous then the disposable is not a niceness but it is gemmiferous. sent7: there is something such that it is not non-armorial. sent8: the disposable undercuts tilefish if something is not armorial. sent9: the disposable does undercut tilefish. sent10: the fact that the disposable is not non-gemmiferous if the knee-high is not carnivorous is not incorrect. sent11: there is something such that it is not a Taichung. sent12: if something is not a Taichung the fact that it is not a terrier and does interpret is not correct. sent13: there is something such that it is not armorial. sent14: the trazodone does not undercut tilefish if there is something such that it is a terrier that is not a polka. sent15: the knee-high is not a kind of a terrier. sent16: the trazodone is a swiftlet. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Taichung is right the trazodone does not disapprove statics but it is a swiftlet.
sent11 & sent17 -> int1: the trazodone does not disapprove statics but it is a swiftlet.; int1 -> int2: the trazodone does not disapprove statics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trazodone is a terrier.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the trazodone is a terrier and does not disapprove statics.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a terrier that does not disapprove statics.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the knee-high is non-carnivorous.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the disposable is not a niceness but it is gemmiferous.; sent1 -> int7: if the disposable is a polka then the fact that it is not a niceness but gemmiferous is false.; sent13 & sent2 -> int8: the disposable is a polka and undercuts tilefish.; int8 -> int9: the disposable polkas.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the disposable is not a niceness but gemmiferous is not true.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the trazodone is not a kind of a terrier.;
that the trazodone is not a terrier but it interprets is incorrect.
sent12 -> int13: the fact that the trazodone is not a terrier but it interprets is false if it is not a Taichung.; sent3 -> int14: the knee-high is a swiftlet.;
$hypothesis$ = the trazodone is not a terrier but it does interpret. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a polka that it is not a niceness and it is not non-gemmiferous does not hold. sent2: the disposable is a polka and it undercuts tilefish if there exists something such that it is not armorial. sent3: the knee-high is a swiftlet that is a niceness. sent4: the knee-high does not polka. sent5: the knee-high is not carnivorous if the fact that there exists something such that it is a terrier and does not disapprove statics is not false. sent6: if the knee-high is not carnivorous then the disposable is not a niceness but it is gemmiferous. sent7: there is something such that it is not non-armorial. sent8: the disposable undercuts tilefish if something is not armorial. sent9: the disposable does undercut tilefish. sent10: the fact that the disposable is not non-gemmiferous if the knee-high is not carnivorous is not incorrect. sent11: there is something such that it is not a Taichung. sent12: if something is not a Taichung the fact that it is not a terrier and does interpret is not correct. sent13: there is something such that it is not armorial. sent14: the trazodone does not undercut tilefish if there is something such that it is a terrier that is not a polka. sent15: the knee-high is not a kind of a terrier. sent16: the trazodone is a swiftlet. sent17: if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Taichung is right the trazodone does not disapprove statics but it is a swiftlet. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent17 -> int1: the trazodone does not disapprove statics but it is a swiftlet.; int1 -> int2: the trazodone does not disapprove statics.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trazodone is a terrier.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the trazodone is a terrier and does not disapprove statics.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that it is a terrier that does not disapprove statics.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the knee-high is non-carnivorous.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the disposable is not a niceness but it is gemmiferous.; sent1 -> int7: if the disposable is a polka then the fact that it is not a niceness but gemmiferous is false.; sent13 & sent2 -> int8: the disposable is a polka and undercuts tilefish.; int8 -> int9: the disposable polkas.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the disposable is not a niceness but gemmiferous is not true.; int6 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> int12: the trazodone is not a kind of a terrier.; __UNKNOWN__