the fixer is dipterous.
sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of embolic thing that is not a Lithocarpus does not hold the perinatologist is not a kind of a Barbadian. sent2: if the fact that something does not qualify consuetude and it is not eschatological is not right then it qualify consuetude. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Lithocarpus the fact that it is a coatrack and is a position is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that that it is unripe does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that that it whines and is not little does not hold then that the perinatologist is not a kind of a handover is true. sent6: something is a jackhammer if it does qualify consuetude. sent7: the Strand is incestuous. sent8: if the fact that something does not reschedule fixer and/or it is euphoric is incorrect it does not modernize. sent9: if the cravat is not unripe then the fact that the salal whines but it is not a little is incorrect. sent10: if the Orthoptera does not modernize the cravat is not unripe. sent11: that the fixer is either a coatrack or a position or both is correct if there exists something such that it is not a handover. sent12: something is not non-Barbadian if it is a coatrack. sent13: the fixer is embolic. sent14: the perinatologist is a kind of a Barbadian. sent15: the fact that something does not reschedule fixer and/or is euphoric is not right if it is a jackhammer. sent16: the cravat does not position. sent17: if the Orthoptera is unripe the fixer is dipterous. sent18: if the salal whines the perinatologist is a handover but not little. sent19: the fact that the Orthoptera does not qualify consuetude and it is not eschatological is false if it lodges. sent20: the fact that if something is a Barbadian then it is not dipterous is not incorrect. sent21: the perinatologist is not a kind of a Barbadian if something is not embolic. sent22: if that the carbuncle is both a coatrack and a position is incorrect then the salal is not a handover. sent23: the launchpad is a lodging. sent24: if the launchpad is a kind of a lodging the Orthoptera is a kind of a lodging. sent25: if the salal is not a handover the cravat is not a little and it does not whine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the carbuncle is not non-embolic but it is not a Lithocarpus is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is embolic but not a Lithocarpus is wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the perinatologist is not a Barbadian.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the carbuncle is both embolic and not a Lithocarpus.; int4 -> int5: the carbuncle is not a Lithocarpus.; sent3 -> int6: if the carbuncle is not a kind of a Lithocarpus then the fact that it is a kind of a coatrack and it is a position does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the carbuncle is a coatrack and it is a position does not hold.; int7 & sent22 -> int8: the salal is not a handover.; int8 & sent25 -> int9: the cravat is a kind of non-little thing that does not whine.;
the fixer is not dipterous.
sent20 -> int10: the fixer is not dipterous if it is a kind of a Barbadian.; sent8 -> int11: the Orthoptera does not modernize if the fact that it either does not reschedule fixer or is euphoric or both does not hold.; sent15 -> int12: that that either the Orthoptera does not reschedule fixer or it is euphoric or both hold is not true if it is a jackhammer.; sent6 -> int13: if the Orthoptera qualifies consuetude it is a jackhammer.; sent2 -> int14: if that the Orthoptera does not qualify consuetude and it is not eschatological is not right then it does qualify consuetude.; sent24 & sent23 -> int15: the Orthoptera lodges.; sent19 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the Orthoptera does not qualify consuetude and is not eschatological is not right.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the Orthoptera does qualify consuetude.; int13 & int17 -> int18: that the Orthoptera is not a jackhammer does not hold.; int12 & int18 -> int19: that the Orthoptera does not reschedule fixer and/or it is euphoric is incorrect.; int11 & int19 -> int20: the Orthoptera does not modernize.; sent10 & int20 -> int21: the cravat is not unripe.; sent9 & int21 -> int22: that the salal whines but it is not a little does not hold.; int22 -> int23: there is something such that the fact that it does whine and it is not a kind of a little is not true.; int23 & sent5 -> int24: the perinatologist is not a handover.; int24 -> int25: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a handover.; int25 & sent11 -> int26: the fixer is a kind of a coatrack and/or it is a position.; sent12 -> int27: the fixer is a Barbadian if it is a coatrack.;
$hypothesis$ = the fixer is dipterous. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of embolic thing that is not a Lithocarpus does not hold the perinatologist is not a kind of a Barbadian. sent2: if the fact that something does not qualify consuetude and it is not eschatological is not right then it qualify consuetude. sent3: if something is not a kind of a Lithocarpus the fact that it is a coatrack and is a position is incorrect. sent4: there is something such that that it is unripe does not hold. sent5: if there is something such that that it whines and is not little does not hold then that the perinatologist is not a kind of a handover is true. sent6: something is a jackhammer if it does qualify consuetude. sent7: the Strand is incestuous. sent8: if the fact that something does not reschedule fixer and/or it is euphoric is incorrect it does not modernize. sent9: if the cravat is not unripe then the fact that the salal whines but it is not a little is incorrect. sent10: if the Orthoptera does not modernize the cravat is not unripe. sent11: that the fixer is either a coatrack or a position or both is correct if there exists something such that it is not a handover. sent12: something is not non-Barbadian if it is a coatrack. sent13: the fixer is embolic. sent14: the perinatologist is a kind of a Barbadian. sent15: the fact that something does not reschedule fixer and/or is euphoric is not right if it is a jackhammer. sent16: the cravat does not position. sent17: if the Orthoptera is unripe the fixer is dipterous. sent18: if the salal whines the perinatologist is a handover but not little. sent19: the fact that the Orthoptera does not qualify consuetude and it is not eschatological is false if it lodges. sent20: the fact that if something is a Barbadian then it is not dipterous is not incorrect. sent21: the perinatologist is not a kind of a Barbadian if something is not embolic. sent22: if that the carbuncle is both a coatrack and a position is incorrect then the salal is not a handover. sent23: the launchpad is a lodging. sent24: if the launchpad is a kind of a lodging the Orthoptera is a kind of a lodging. sent25: if the salal is not a handover the cravat is not a little and it does not whine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the carbuncle is not non-embolic but it is not a Lithocarpus is incorrect.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it is embolic but not a Lithocarpus is wrong.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the perinatologist is not a Barbadian.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the carbuncle is both embolic and not a Lithocarpus.; int4 -> int5: the carbuncle is not a Lithocarpus.; sent3 -> int6: if the carbuncle is not a kind of a Lithocarpus then the fact that it is a kind of a coatrack and it is a position does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the carbuncle is a coatrack and it is a position does not hold.; int7 & sent22 -> int8: the salal is not a handover.; int8 & sent25 -> int9: the cravat is a kind of non-little thing that does not whine.; __UNKNOWN__