the stickling does not occur and the acculturationalness does not occur.
sent1: the occulting and the mismanaging sorceress happens. sent2: the fact that not the choking but the polling happens is not correct if the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent3: if the unconscious does not occur the fact that the stickling does not occur but the acculturationalness occurs is incorrect. sent4: that both the stickling and the non-acculturationalness occurs is not correct. sent5: the fact that the stickling does not occur but the acculturationalness happens is false. sent6: if the unconsciousness does not occur then the fact that the stickling does not occur and the acculturationalness does not occur does not hold. sent7: the stereoscopicness occurs. sent8: that the poll occurs is prevented by that the unconsciousness occurs and the stereoscopicness occurs. sent9: that the nickeling sole does not occur yields that the freckling pride does not occur and the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent10: both the poll and the choking occurs. sent11: if the unconsciousness does not occur that the stickling and the non-acculturationalness occurs is not true. sent12: the choking happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unconscious happens.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the unconsciousness and the stereoscopicness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the polling does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the poll happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the unconsciousness does not occur is correct.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the stickling does not occur and the acculturationalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the stickling does not occur and the acculturationalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the occulting and the mismanaging sorceress happens. sent2: the fact that not the choking but the polling happens is not correct if the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent3: if the unconscious does not occur the fact that the stickling does not occur but the acculturationalness occurs is incorrect. sent4: that both the stickling and the non-acculturationalness occurs is not correct. sent5: the fact that the stickling does not occur but the acculturationalness happens is false. sent6: if the unconsciousness does not occur then the fact that the stickling does not occur and the acculturationalness does not occur does not hold. sent7: the stereoscopicness occurs. sent8: that the poll occurs is prevented by that the unconsciousness occurs and the stereoscopicness occurs. sent9: that the nickeling sole does not occur yields that the freckling pride does not occur and the pteridologicalness does not occur. sent10: both the poll and the choking occurs. sent11: if the unconsciousness does not occur that the stickling and the non-acculturationalness occurs is not true. sent12: the choking happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unconscious happens.; assump1 & sent7 -> int1: the unconsciousness and the stereoscopicness happens.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the polling does not occur.; sent10 -> int3: the poll happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the unconsciousness does not occur is correct.; int5 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__