the prude does sicken abjurer but it is not a kind of a Cuban.
sent1: something is Palladian. sent2: if the freelancer is a psychology then it is abiogenetic but not a Cuban. sent3: if the megaloblast does suborn progymnosperm the argent suborn progymnosperm. sent4: if the argent suborns progymnosperm then that it does not gather nonmember and/or it is not parental hold. sent5: the enzyme is Sotho but it is not a Odobenus. sent6: the prude is autocatalytic if there is something such that it is sectorial. sent7: the freelancer is abiogenetic if it is a kind of non-caudate thing that is not a kind of a psychology. sent8: the prude is not a polka. sent9: if something is not abiogenetic then it is not a kind of a religionist. sent10: the freelancer is biologistic but it does not suborn progymnosperm. sent11: the freelancer is not a kind of a religionist and it is not a psychology. sent12: something either suborns progymnosperm or is a kind of a angioma or both if it does not suborn correlate. sent13: if there is something such that it either does not gather nonmember or is not parental or both the Mountie is not abiogenetic. sent14: the argent does suborn progymnosperm if the megaloblast is a kind of a angioma. sent15: the prude is a kind of a religionist if there exists something such that it is abiogenetic. sent16: something does sicken abjurer and is not a Cuban if it is a kind of a religionist. sent17: the freelancer is a caudate and not abiogenetic if the fact that it is a religionist is not false. sent18: the fact that the megaloblast does not suborn correlate is not false if a Sotho thing is not a Odobenus. sent19: that the freelancer is not a caudate and not a psychology is right. sent20: that the prude is abiogenetic is right if it does not sicken abjurer and it is not a psychology. sent21: the freelancer is abiogenetic if it is not caudate and it is a psychology. sent22: the prude is a kind of a psychology.
sent7 & sent19 -> int1: the freelancer is abiogenetic.; int1 -> int2: there are abiogenetic things.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the prude is a religionist.; sent16 -> int4: the prude sickens abjurer but it is not a Cuban if it is a religionist.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the prude sickens abjurer but it is not Cuban is wrong.
sent12 -> int5: if the megaloblast does not suborn correlate then it does suborn progymnosperm and/or is a angioma.; sent5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a Sotho that is not a Odobenus.; int6 & sent18 -> int7: the megaloblast does not suborn correlate.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the megaloblast suborns progymnosperm and/or it is a kind of a angioma.; int8 & sent3 & sent14 -> int9: the argent suborns progymnosperm.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: the argent either does not gather nonmember or is not parental or both.; int10 -> int11: something does not gather nonmember or is not parental or both.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the Mountie is not abiogenetic.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that it is not abiogenetic.;
$hypothesis$ = the prude does sicken abjurer but it is not a kind of a Cuban. ; $context$ = sent1: something is Palladian. sent2: if the freelancer is a psychology then it is abiogenetic but not a Cuban. sent3: if the megaloblast does suborn progymnosperm the argent suborn progymnosperm. sent4: if the argent suborns progymnosperm then that it does not gather nonmember and/or it is not parental hold. sent5: the enzyme is Sotho but it is not a Odobenus. sent6: the prude is autocatalytic if there is something such that it is sectorial. sent7: the freelancer is abiogenetic if it is a kind of non-caudate thing that is not a kind of a psychology. sent8: the prude is not a polka. sent9: if something is not abiogenetic then it is not a kind of a religionist. sent10: the freelancer is biologistic but it does not suborn progymnosperm. sent11: the freelancer is not a kind of a religionist and it is not a psychology. sent12: something either suborns progymnosperm or is a kind of a angioma or both if it does not suborn correlate. sent13: if there is something such that it either does not gather nonmember or is not parental or both the Mountie is not abiogenetic. sent14: the argent does suborn progymnosperm if the megaloblast is a kind of a angioma. sent15: the prude is a kind of a religionist if there exists something such that it is abiogenetic. sent16: something does sicken abjurer and is not a Cuban if it is a kind of a religionist. sent17: the freelancer is a caudate and not abiogenetic if the fact that it is a religionist is not false. sent18: the fact that the megaloblast does not suborn correlate is not false if a Sotho thing is not a Odobenus. sent19: that the freelancer is not a caudate and not a psychology is right. sent20: that the prude is abiogenetic is right if it does not sicken abjurer and it is not a psychology. sent21: the freelancer is abiogenetic if it is not caudate and it is a psychology. sent22: the prude is a kind of a psychology. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent19 -> int1: the freelancer is abiogenetic.; int1 -> int2: there are abiogenetic things.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the prude is a religionist.; sent16 -> int4: the prude sickens abjurer but it is not a Cuban if it is a religionist.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__