that if the officializing Stalin happens that the fact that not the officializing lined but the patronaging happens hold is false is not right.
sent1: that the officializing lined and the patronaging happens results in the non-incompressibleness. sent2: the consulship does not occur but the angiocarpicness happens. sent3: that the violableness and the officializing RN happens is incorrect. sent4: if that either the officializing Stalin does not occur or the incompressibleness does not occur or both does not hold then the fluff does not occur. sent5: the officializing Stalin is prevented by the compressibleness. sent6: if the incompressibleness does not occur then the officializing Stalin occurs. sent7: both the non-obtrusiveness and the myopathicness happens. sent8: the officializing lined does not occur. sent9: if the veto happens the fact that not the realigning Curietherapy but the proving happens is wrong. sent10: if the preferment happens then the fact that the officializing Stalin does not occur or the incompressibleness does not occur or both does not hold. sent11: the officializing lined does not occur but the patronaging happens if the officializing Stalin occurs. sent12: the fact that the officializing lined happens and the patronage happens is not right. sent13: that not the officializing lined but the patronaging happens triggers the compressibleness. sent14: that the officializing lined happens and the patronage occurs does not hold if the officializing Stalin occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the officializing Stalin occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the officializing lined but the patronage happens.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the incompressibleness does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the officializing Stalin does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the officializing lined does not occur and the patronage occurs is not true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fluff does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that if the officializing Stalin happens that the fact that not the officializing lined but the patronaging happens hold is false is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the officializing lined and the patronaging happens results in the non-incompressibleness. sent2: the consulship does not occur but the angiocarpicness happens. sent3: that the violableness and the officializing RN happens is incorrect. sent4: if that either the officializing Stalin does not occur or the incompressibleness does not occur or both does not hold then the fluff does not occur. sent5: the officializing Stalin is prevented by the compressibleness. sent6: if the incompressibleness does not occur then the officializing Stalin occurs. sent7: both the non-obtrusiveness and the myopathicness happens. sent8: the officializing lined does not occur. sent9: if the veto happens the fact that not the realigning Curietherapy but the proving happens is wrong. sent10: if the preferment happens then the fact that the officializing Stalin does not occur or the incompressibleness does not occur or both does not hold. sent11: the officializing lined does not occur but the patronaging happens if the officializing Stalin occurs. sent12: the fact that the officializing lined happens and the patronage happens is not right. sent13: that not the officializing lined but the patronaging happens triggers the compressibleness. sent14: that the officializing lined happens and the patronage occurs does not hold if the officializing Stalin occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the officializing Stalin occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that not the officializing lined but the patronage happens.; sent13 & assump2 -> int1: the incompressibleness does not occur.; sent5 & int1 -> int2: the officializing Stalin does not occur.; assump1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int3 -> int4: the fact that the officializing lined does not occur and the patronage occurs is not true.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__