the concocting Marche does not occur or the hieroglyphicness occurs or both.
sent1: the non-shortsness and the intervening happens. sent2: the annealing does not occur if the hieroglyphicness occurs. sent3: the glaring scandalousness happens if the readmission does not occur or the abomination does not occur or both. sent4: that the meditating does not occur causes that the hieroglyphicness happens and/or the concocting Marche occurs. sent5: the meditating occurs. sent6: that the nonprehensileness does not occur causes that the concocting trader but not the snorting occurs. sent7: if the fact that the glaring scandalousness does not occur is not wrong the annealing and the Numidian happens. sent8: that both the nonprehensileness and the roping Bartok occurs prevents that the ELINT occurs. sent9: the geminating splitsville occurs. sent10: the concocting trader and the nonprehensileness happens. sent11: the ELINT occurs if the meditating happens. sent12: if not the roping Bartok but the annealing happens that the concocting Marche does not occur is right. sent13: the glaring scandalousness does not occur.
sent10 -> int1: the nonprehensileness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roping Bartok occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the nonprehensileness and the roping Bartok happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the ELINT does not occur.; sent11 & sent5 -> int4: that the ELINT occurs is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the roping Bartok does not occur.; sent7 & sent13 -> int7: the annealing occurs and the Numidianness occurs.; int7 -> int8: the annealing occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the roping Bartok does not occur and the annealing happens.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the concocting Marche does not occur.; int10 -> hypothesis;
the snorting does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the concocting Marche does not occur or the hieroglyphicness occurs or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the non-shortsness and the intervening happens. sent2: the annealing does not occur if the hieroglyphicness occurs. sent3: the glaring scandalousness happens if the readmission does not occur or the abomination does not occur or both. sent4: that the meditating does not occur causes that the hieroglyphicness happens and/or the concocting Marche occurs. sent5: the meditating occurs. sent6: that the nonprehensileness does not occur causes that the concocting trader but not the snorting occurs. sent7: if the fact that the glaring scandalousness does not occur is not wrong the annealing and the Numidian happens. sent8: that both the nonprehensileness and the roping Bartok occurs prevents that the ELINT occurs. sent9: the geminating splitsville occurs. sent10: the concocting trader and the nonprehensileness happens. sent11: the ELINT occurs if the meditating happens. sent12: if not the roping Bartok but the annealing happens that the concocting Marche does not occur is right. sent13: the glaring scandalousness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: the nonprehensileness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the roping Bartok occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the nonprehensileness and the roping Bartok happens.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the ELINT does not occur.; sent11 & sent5 -> int4: that the ELINT occurs is right.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the roping Bartok does not occur.; sent7 & sent13 -> int7: the annealing occurs and the Numidianness occurs.; int7 -> int8: the annealing occurs.; int6 & int8 -> int9: the roping Bartok does not occur and the annealing happens.; int9 & sent12 -> int10: the concocting Marche does not occur.; int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__