the sawpit is emptying.
sent1: if something is not a drawl that it is a kind of an emptying and it is a napu is wrong. sent2: everything does drawl. sent3: the zooplankton drawls. sent4: the sawpit is bisectional. sent5: if the sawpit does greet demoniac and does greet oophorectomy it is not a napu. sent6: if something that is not a napu is a drawl then it is an emptying. sent7: the columnist does not greet demoniac and/or it is not a drawl if something is not a drawl. sent8: something that does dump snapline does not dump nympholepsy and is geostrategic. sent9: if the sawpit is a kind of a drawl it is an emptying. sent10: the fact that something does not drawl but it does empty does not hold if it is not a napu. sent11: if something does greet oophorectomy then it greets demoniac. sent12: everything is eutherian. sent13: the fact that the fact that the scone is not a kind of a rust and is volcanic hold does not hold. sent14: something that greets demoniac is not a napu and is a drawl. sent15: if the wrangler does not dump nympholepsy but it is geostrategic then the neurologist is geostrategic. sent16: something does greet demoniac and does greet oophorectomy if it is not oncological. sent17: the sannup does greet oophorectomy if the columnist is oncological. sent18: the columnist is oncological if that the neurologist is not non-geostrategic is true.
sent2 -> int1: the sawpit drawls.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the sannup is an emptying.
sent6 -> int2: if the sannup is not a kind of a napu but it does drawl then it is a kind of an emptying.; sent14 -> int3: if the sannup does greet demoniac then it is not a napu and it drawls.; sent11 -> int4: if the sannup does greet oophorectomy then it does greet demoniac.; sent8 -> int5: the fact that the wrangler does not dump nympholepsy and is geostrategic is correct if it dumps snapline.; sent13 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not rust and it is volcanic does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the sawpit is emptying. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a drawl that it is a kind of an emptying and it is a napu is wrong. sent2: everything does drawl. sent3: the zooplankton drawls. sent4: the sawpit is bisectional. sent5: if the sawpit does greet demoniac and does greet oophorectomy it is not a napu. sent6: if something that is not a napu is a drawl then it is an emptying. sent7: the columnist does not greet demoniac and/or it is not a drawl if something is not a drawl. sent8: something that does dump snapline does not dump nympholepsy and is geostrategic. sent9: if the sawpit is a kind of a drawl it is an emptying. sent10: the fact that something does not drawl but it does empty does not hold if it is not a napu. sent11: if something does greet oophorectomy then it greets demoniac. sent12: everything is eutherian. sent13: the fact that the fact that the scone is not a kind of a rust and is volcanic hold does not hold. sent14: something that greets demoniac is not a napu and is a drawl. sent15: if the wrangler does not dump nympholepsy but it is geostrategic then the neurologist is geostrategic. sent16: something does greet demoniac and does greet oophorectomy if it is not oncological. sent17: the sannup does greet oophorectomy if the columnist is oncological. sent18: the columnist is oncological if that the neurologist is not non-geostrategic is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the sawpit drawls.; int1 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__