the neckcloth is a lithographer.
sent1: if there is something such that it does not usher tailplane and/or it is not institutional then the procrastinator is not a collectible. sent2: if the grazing is a crib then it is a collectible. sent3: that if the neckcloth is a Prakrit the grazing is a lithographer is correct. sent4: if something does exhilarate deliberation then it is a kind of a crib. sent5: if something is unwearable that it exhilarates percept and is not a gallop is not right. sent6: if the fact that the neckcloth does not exhilarate deliberation and it is not a collectible does not hold then that the lignite does not exhilarate deliberation is true. sent7: that the glyceryl is unwearable and it embowers Levisticum is right. sent8: the fact that the plier exhilarates Micmac and it is a taffrail does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the glyceryl exhilarates percept but it is not a gallop is false then it is elemental. sent10: the fact that the circle is not elemental but a zygoma is wrong. sent11: if something is a collectible it does usher tailplane. sent12: that the neckcloth does not exhilarate deliberation and is not a collectible is not right if that the procrastinator is not a kind of a crib is right. sent13: if something is a Prakrit then the grazing either does not usher tailplane or is not institutional or both. sent14: if the grazing is a Prakrit then it does not usher tailplane and it is not institutional. sent15: the circle is a Prakrit if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a zygoma and is not a Prakrit is incorrect. sent16: the grazing exhilarates deliberation if the procrastinator ushers slump. sent17: something is a kind of a lithographer if that it is not a lithographer and it does usher slump is false. sent18: the fact that something is not a kind of a lithographer and does usher slump does not hold if it does not exhilarate deliberation. sent19: the fact that the menhir is not a kind of a omega-3 but it is incomplete is incorrect. sent20: if the neckcloth is a lithographer the procrastinator does usher slump. sent21: something does usher slump and it is a lithographer if it does not exhilarate deliberation. sent22: if the fact that that the circle is both not elemental and a zygoma is not incorrect does not hold the grazing is a Prakrit. sent23: if the glyceryl is elemental the lightweight is elemental. sent24: if the lightweight is elemental then that the Micmac is not a zygoma and is not a Prakrit does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neckcloth is a lithographer.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the procrastinator ushers slump.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the grazing does exhilarate deliberation.; sent4 -> int3: the grazing is a crib if the fact that it does exhilarate deliberation hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the grazing does crib.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the grazing is a kind of a collectible.; sent11 -> int6: if the fact that the grazing is a kind of a collectible is true it ushers tailplane.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the grazing ushers tailplane.; sent22 & sent10 -> int8: the grazing is a Prakrit.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the grazing does not usher tailplane and it is noninstitutional.; int9 -> int10: the grazing does not usher tailplane.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the neckcloth is a lithographer.
sent17 -> int12: the neckcloth is a lithographer if that it is not a lithographer and does usher slump is false.; sent18 -> int13: the fact that if the neckcloth does not exhilarate deliberation then that the neckcloth is not a kind of a lithographer but it ushers slump is not true hold.; sent5 -> int14: if the glyceryl is unwearable then that it does exhilarate percept and it does not gallop is not true.; sent7 -> int15: the glyceryl is unwearable.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the fact that the glyceryl does exhilarate percept but it is not a gallop is incorrect.; sent9 & int16 -> int17: that the glyceryl is elemental is not false.; sent23 & int17 -> int18: the lightweight is elemental.; sent24 & int18 -> int19: the fact that that the Micmac is not a zygoma and is not a Prakrit is right is not right.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a zygoma and is not a Prakrit is incorrect.; int20 & sent15 -> int21: the circle is a Prakrit.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that it is a Prakrit.; int22 & sent13 -> int23: the fact that the grazing does not usher tailplane or it is not institutional or both is true.; int23 -> int24: there is something such that it either does not usher tailplane or is not institutional or both.; int24 & sent1 -> int25: the procrastinator is not a collectible.;
$hypothesis$ = the neckcloth is a lithographer. ; $context$ = sent1: if there is something such that it does not usher tailplane and/or it is not institutional then the procrastinator is not a collectible. sent2: if the grazing is a crib then it is a collectible. sent3: that if the neckcloth is a Prakrit the grazing is a lithographer is correct. sent4: if something does exhilarate deliberation then it is a kind of a crib. sent5: if something is unwearable that it exhilarates percept and is not a gallop is not right. sent6: if the fact that the neckcloth does not exhilarate deliberation and it is not a collectible does not hold then that the lignite does not exhilarate deliberation is true. sent7: that the glyceryl is unwearable and it embowers Levisticum is right. sent8: the fact that the plier exhilarates Micmac and it is a taffrail does not hold. sent9: if the fact that the glyceryl exhilarates percept but it is not a gallop is false then it is elemental. sent10: the fact that the circle is not elemental but a zygoma is wrong. sent11: if something is a collectible it does usher tailplane. sent12: that the neckcloth does not exhilarate deliberation and is not a collectible is not right if that the procrastinator is not a kind of a crib is right. sent13: if something is a Prakrit then the grazing either does not usher tailplane or is not institutional or both. sent14: if the grazing is a Prakrit then it does not usher tailplane and it is not institutional. sent15: the circle is a Prakrit if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a zygoma and is not a Prakrit is incorrect. sent16: the grazing exhilarates deliberation if the procrastinator ushers slump. sent17: something is a kind of a lithographer if that it is not a lithographer and it does usher slump is false. sent18: the fact that something is not a kind of a lithographer and does usher slump does not hold if it does not exhilarate deliberation. sent19: the fact that the menhir is not a kind of a omega-3 but it is incomplete is incorrect. sent20: if the neckcloth is a lithographer the procrastinator does usher slump. sent21: something does usher slump and it is a lithographer if it does not exhilarate deliberation. sent22: if the fact that that the circle is both not elemental and a zygoma is not incorrect does not hold the grazing is a Prakrit. sent23: if the glyceryl is elemental the lightweight is elemental. sent24: if the lightweight is elemental then that the Micmac is not a zygoma and is not a Prakrit does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the neckcloth is a lithographer.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the procrastinator ushers slump.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the grazing does exhilarate deliberation.; sent4 -> int3: the grazing is a crib if the fact that it does exhilarate deliberation hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the grazing does crib.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the grazing is a kind of a collectible.; sent11 -> int6: if the fact that the grazing is a kind of a collectible is true it ushers tailplane.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the grazing ushers tailplane.; sent22 & sent10 -> int8: the grazing is a Prakrit.; sent14 & int8 -> int9: the grazing does not usher tailplane and it is noninstitutional.; int9 -> int10: the grazing does not usher tailplane.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__