the polemonium does not impinge cryoscope.
sent1: that the peregrine does impinge cryoscope is not wrong. sent2: the polemonium impinges cryoscope if the peregrine blacklists cerumen. sent3: there is something such that it is not unreproducible. sent4: if something is genic it does blacklist cerumen. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is unreproducible is not incorrect. sent6: that either something is not genic or it blacklists cerumen or both is incorrect if it does not impend. sent7: the polemonium does not impinge cryoscope if the peregrine is not unreproducible. sent8: that the peregrine is a kind of congregational a panel is not correct. sent9: the fact that the peregrine is both congregational and not a panel is wrong if there is something such that it is not unreproducible. sent10: the bast is non-congregational if that the fact that the plaque is not genic or it does blacklist cerumen or both is not true is correct. sent11: if that something is congregational but it does not panel is wrong then it is not non-genic. sent12: something is genic if it panels. sent13: if the peregrine is a kind of a panel it is genic. sent14: if the peregrine panels then the polemonium is congregational. sent15: the fact that the cerumen is an acuity is correct if it is granuliferous. sent16: the polemonium panels. sent17: the fact that the peregrine is congregational but it does not impinge cryoscope does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a panel. sent18: the neuropil blacklists cerumen. sent19: something impinges cryoscope if the fact that it is both a panel and not congregational is not right. sent20: the fact that the peregrine is congregational and it panels does not hold if there exists something such that it is not unreproducible. sent21: something does tell if it does stave scorched.
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: that the peregrine is congregational but it is not a panel is false.; sent11 -> int2: the peregrine is genic if the fact that it is congregational thing that is not a kind of a panel is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peregrine is not non-genic.; sent4 -> int4: the peregrine does blacklist cerumen if that it is genic is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the peregrine blacklists cerumen.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the polemonium does not impinge cryoscope.
sent6 -> int6: if the plaque does not impend that it is not genic and/or it blacklists cerumen does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the polemonium does not impinge cryoscope. ; $context$ = sent1: that the peregrine does impinge cryoscope is not wrong. sent2: the polemonium impinges cryoscope if the peregrine blacklists cerumen. sent3: there is something such that it is not unreproducible. sent4: if something is genic it does blacklist cerumen. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it is unreproducible is not incorrect. sent6: that either something is not genic or it blacklists cerumen or both is incorrect if it does not impend. sent7: the polemonium does not impinge cryoscope if the peregrine is not unreproducible. sent8: that the peregrine is a kind of congregational a panel is not correct. sent9: the fact that the peregrine is both congregational and not a panel is wrong if there is something such that it is not unreproducible. sent10: the bast is non-congregational if that the fact that the plaque is not genic or it does blacklist cerumen or both is not true is correct. sent11: if that something is congregational but it does not panel is wrong then it is not non-genic. sent12: something is genic if it panels. sent13: if the peregrine is a kind of a panel it is genic. sent14: if the peregrine panels then the polemonium is congregational. sent15: the fact that the cerumen is an acuity is correct if it is granuliferous. sent16: the polemonium panels. sent17: the fact that the peregrine is congregational but it does not impinge cryoscope does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a panel. sent18: the neuropil blacklists cerumen. sent19: something impinges cryoscope if the fact that it is both a panel and not congregational is not right. sent20: the fact that the peregrine is congregational and it panels does not hold if there exists something such that it is not unreproducible. sent21: something does tell if it does stave scorched. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent9 -> int1: that the peregrine is congregational but it is not a panel is false.; sent11 -> int2: the peregrine is genic if the fact that it is congregational thing that is not a kind of a panel is not true.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peregrine is not non-genic.; sent4 -> int4: the peregrine does blacklist cerumen if that it is genic is not false.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the peregrine blacklists cerumen.; int5 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__