the altarpiece is not a mumble.
sent1: if the barndoor is not a gluteus the covariation is not a Varanidae. sent2: if the fact that there is something such that it does not nod altarpiece is not false the fact that the sard is not uncut is not wrong. sent3: the baker is not a kind of a masculine if the fact that it does crook rivulus hold. sent4: the barndoor is a gluteus that nods Parji. sent5: there exists something such that it does not nod altarpiece. sent6: the baker is not a masculine if the fact that it is a Varanidae and does not crook rivulus is not correct. sent7: if something that is masculine does not crook rivulus then the fact that it is not unregretful hold. sent8: that the sard is not unregretful and not a gluteus is wrong if the barndoor is a gluteus. sent9: if that something is both a surcharge and a charter does not hold then it is not a kind of a Varanidae. sent10: if the fact that the baker is not a mumble and surcharges is incorrect then it is a masculine. sent11: if the sard does not crook rivulus then the fact that the baker is a Varanidae and does not crook rivulus does not hold. sent12: the fact that something does not nod Parji but it is a gluteus is incorrect if the fact that it is not unregretful is not false. sent13: if the sard is a kind of a gluteus and is unregretful the barndoor is not a kind of a gluteus. sent14: that something does not nod Parji and it does not crook rivulus is right if that it is a masculine is right. sent15: if the fact that something is not unregretful and is not a gluteus does not hold then it does not crook rivulus. sent16: the fact that the baker is a kind of a Varanidae that crooks rivulus is false if the fact that the sard does not crooks rivulus is true. sent17: if something charters the fact that it is not a kind of a mumble and it is a kind of a surcharge is not true. sent18: if the altarpiece is not a kind of a mumble the fact that the sard does crook rivulus and it mumble is not correct. sent19: the altarpiece is not a kind of a mumble if the baker is not a kind of a masculine. sent20: the fact that the sard is both unregretful and not a gluteus does not hold. sent21: that something is both a surcharge and a charter is not correct if that it is not uncut is correct. sent22: something does not crook rivulus if that it is unregretful is not incorrect.
sent4 -> int1: that the barndoor is a gluteus is correct.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the sard is regretful thing that is not a gluteus is wrong.; sent15 -> int3: if the fact that the sard is not unregretful and is not a gluteus is false then it does not crook rivulus.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sard does not crook rivulus.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the fact that the baker is a Varanidae that does not crook rivulus is wrong.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the baker is not a masculine.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the covariation is not a Varanidae.
sent14 -> int7: if the baker is masculine then it does not nod Parji and does not crook rivulus.; sent17 -> int8: if the baker is a charter then that it is not a mumble but a surcharge does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the altarpiece is not a mumble. ; $context$ = sent1: if the barndoor is not a gluteus the covariation is not a Varanidae. sent2: if the fact that there is something such that it does not nod altarpiece is not false the fact that the sard is not uncut is not wrong. sent3: the baker is not a kind of a masculine if the fact that it does crook rivulus hold. sent4: the barndoor is a gluteus that nods Parji. sent5: there exists something such that it does not nod altarpiece. sent6: the baker is not a masculine if the fact that it is a Varanidae and does not crook rivulus is not correct. sent7: if something that is masculine does not crook rivulus then the fact that it is not unregretful hold. sent8: that the sard is not unregretful and not a gluteus is wrong if the barndoor is a gluteus. sent9: if that something is both a surcharge and a charter does not hold then it is not a kind of a Varanidae. sent10: if the fact that the baker is not a mumble and surcharges is incorrect then it is a masculine. sent11: if the sard does not crook rivulus then the fact that the baker is a Varanidae and does not crook rivulus does not hold. sent12: the fact that something does not nod Parji but it is a gluteus is incorrect if the fact that it is not unregretful is not false. sent13: if the sard is a kind of a gluteus and is unregretful the barndoor is not a kind of a gluteus. sent14: that something does not nod Parji and it does not crook rivulus is right if that it is a masculine is right. sent15: if the fact that something is not unregretful and is not a gluteus does not hold then it does not crook rivulus. sent16: the fact that the baker is a kind of a Varanidae that crooks rivulus is false if the fact that the sard does not crooks rivulus is true. sent17: if something charters the fact that it is not a kind of a mumble and it is a kind of a surcharge is not true. sent18: if the altarpiece is not a kind of a mumble the fact that the sard does crook rivulus and it mumble is not correct. sent19: the altarpiece is not a kind of a mumble if the baker is not a kind of a masculine. sent20: the fact that the sard is both unregretful and not a gluteus does not hold. sent21: that something is both a surcharge and a charter is not correct if that it is not uncut is correct. sent22: something does not crook rivulus if that it is unregretful is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: that the barndoor is a gluteus is correct.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the sard is regretful thing that is not a gluteus is wrong.; sent15 -> int3: if the fact that the sard is not unregretful and is not a gluteus is false then it does not crook rivulus.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sard does not crook rivulus.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the fact that the baker is a Varanidae that does not crook rivulus is wrong.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the baker is not a masculine.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__