there exists something such that if that it is not a sensorium hold it is not a glucagon and it is politics.
sent1: there is something such that if it is not a sensorium it is politics. sent2: something is both not a debt and a glucagon if it is not a dock. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a pantheist then it is not a kind of a groom and it is a kind of a disaster. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is odd it is not unprofitable and it is a kind of a bucket is not wrong. sent5: if the dibucaine is not a sensorium then that it is not a glucagon and it is politics is not false. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a sensorium it is not a glucagon.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the fact that the garage is not a dock hold it is both not a debt and a glucagon.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not a sensorium hold it is not a glucagon and it is politics. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it is not a sensorium it is politics. sent2: something is both not a debt and a glucagon if it is not a dock. sent3: there is something such that if it is not a pantheist then it is not a kind of a groom and it is a kind of a disaster. sent4: the fact that there is something such that if it is odd it is not unprofitable and it is a kind of a bucket is not wrong. sent5: if the dibucaine is not a sensorium then that it is not a glucagon and it is politics is not false. sent6: there is something such that if it is not a sensorium it is not a glucagon. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__