that the strongroom dribbles or it is a subluxation or both is correct.
sent1: the applewood is a stoner. sent2: something does company Babel if it is both undeniable and not datable. sent3: if the Champagne is a kind of a Bench then the applewood does not company Babel and/or does company MRI. sent4: that that the strongroom is unilateral and it is a Bench is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: the Champagne companies MRI if the applewood companies Babel. sent6: the strongroom does not company MRI. sent7: the applewood is not deniable. sent8: the applewood is a stoner that is a hardinggrass. sent9: something is not non-supernaturalist if it is not multilevel. sent10: the Champagne is a kind of a Bench if it is not unilateral and it is not multilevel. sent11: the Champagne is a kind of a subluxation. sent12: something dribbles if that it is not multilevel is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the applewood is not datable and it is supernaturalist is correct. sent14: the strongroom is not multilevel if the fact that it is unilateral is correct. sent15: the fact that the strongroom is unilateral a Bench is not true if something does company MRI. sent16: the Congress is not supernaturalist. sent17: the Champagne is not unilateral and it is not multilevel if it is not a scale. sent18: if something is not supernaturalist it is not undatable and is deniable. sent19: if something is not undatable the fact that it is a dribble and/or a subluxation is not right. sent20: if the applewood is datable and deniable the strongroom is not datable. sent21: if the fact that something is both non-unilateral and a Bench is wrong it is not multilevel.
sent13 -> int1: that the applewood is undatable is true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the applewood is not deniable but it is not datable.; sent2 -> int3: if the applewood is a kind of non-deniable thing that is undatable then it companies Babel.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the applewood companies Babel hold.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Champagne does company MRI.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does company MRI.; sent21 -> int7: the strongroom is not multilevel if the fact that it is both non-unilateral and a Bench is not correct.; sent12 -> int8: if the strongroom is not multilevel it does dribble.;
that either the strongroom is a dribble or it is a subluxation or both is false.
sent19 -> int9: if the strongroom is not undatable that it is a dribble or it is a subluxation or both is not correct.; sent18 -> int10: if the applewood is not supernaturalist then it is not undatable but deniable.;
$hypothesis$ = that the strongroom dribbles or it is a subluxation or both is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the applewood is a stoner. sent2: something does company Babel if it is both undeniable and not datable. sent3: if the Champagne is a kind of a Bench then the applewood does not company Babel and/or does company MRI. sent4: that that the strongroom is unilateral and it is a Bench is not incorrect does not hold. sent5: the Champagne companies MRI if the applewood companies Babel. sent6: the strongroom does not company MRI. sent7: the applewood is not deniable. sent8: the applewood is a stoner that is a hardinggrass. sent9: something is not non-supernaturalist if it is not multilevel. sent10: the Champagne is a kind of a Bench if it is not unilateral and it is not multilevel. sent11: the Champagne is a kind of a subluxation. sent12: something dribbles if that it is not multilevel is not incorrect. sent13: the fact that the applewood is not datable and it is supernaturalist is correct. sent14: the strongroom is not multilevel if the fact that it is unilateral is correct. sent15: the fact that the strongroom is unilateral a Bench is not true if something does company MRI. sent16: the Congress is not supernaturalist. sent17: the Champagne is not unilateral and it is not multilevel if it is not a scale. sent18: if something is not supernaturalist it is not undatable and is deniable. sent19: if something is not undatable the fact that it is a dribble and/or a subluxation is not right. sent20: if the applewood is datable and deniable the strongroom is not datable. sent21: if the fact that something is both non-unilateral and a Bench is wrong it is not multilevel. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: that the applewood is undatable is true.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the applewood is not deniable but it is not datable.; sent2 -> int3: if the applewood is a kind of non-deniable thing that is undatable then it companies Babel.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that the applewood companies Babel hold.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Champagne does company MRI.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it does company MRI.; sent21 -> int7: the strongroom is not multilevel if the fact that it is both non-unilateral and a Bench is not correct.; sent12 -> int8: if the strongroom is not multilevel it does dribble.; __UNKNOWN__