that the rambutan is not a cingulum is correct.
sent1: the Panamanian is a kind of a Oxydendrum. sent2: the sir is proprioceptive. sent3: the sir is not a steamer. sent4: the fact that the Panamanian is not a steamer and not statutory is not correct. sent5: if something is a danewort and it is not non-statutory the rambutan is a cingulum. sent6: the Panamanian does chomp if it is not a alga but a danewort. sent7: the sir is syncretic. sent8: if the Panamanian does chomp but it is not a steamer then it is statutory. sent9: if the Panamanian is proprioceptive it is a alga. sent10: that the Panamanian is the danewort if the Panamanian is not syncretic and it does not chomp is right. sent11: if that the Panamanian is not syncretic and it does not chomp is not right that the sir is not a alga is not false. sent12: the fact that the rambutan is a kind of a cingulum that is not a kind of a danewort is wrong. sent13: something is a cingulum and is syncretic. sent14: the rambutan is publishable and it resets. sent15: the Panamanian is a kind of a steamer. sent16: something is unquiet and it is an anonymity if it is not a danewort. sent17: the sir does chomp if it steamers. sent18: the Panamanian is statutory if it is proprioceptive. sent19: the Panamanian is proprioceptive. sent20: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is a danewort and it is a alga is not incorrect is wrong then the Panamanian is not a kind of a danewort. sent21: if the Panamanian is proprioceptive then that it is a cingulum hold. sent22: the sir is a alga if it is not a steamer.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Panamanian is non-syncretic thing that does not chomp is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the sir is not a alga.; sent22 & sent3 -> int2: the sir is a alga.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Panamanian is not syncretic and it does not chomp is not false.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the Panamanian is a danewort.; sent18 & sent19 -> int6: the Panamanian is statutory.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Panamanian is a danewort and is statutory.; int7 -> int8: something is a danewort and is statutory.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the Panamanian is a kind of unquiet an anonymity.
sent16 -> int9: the Panamanian is unquiet and it is an anonymity if it is not a danewort.;
$hypothesis$ = that the rambutan is not a cingulum is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Panamanian is a kind of a Oxydendrum. sent2: the sir is proprioceptive. sent3: the sir is not a steamer. sent4: the fact that the Panamanian is not a steamer and not statutory is not correct. sent5: if something is a danewort and it is not non-statutory the rambutan is a cingulum. sent6: the Panamanian does chomp if it is not a alga but a danewort. sent7: the sir is syncretic. sent8: if the Panamanian does chomp but it is not a steamer then it is statutory. sent9: if the Panamanian is proprioceptive it is a alga. sent10: that the Panamanian is the danewort if the Panamanian is not syncretic and it does not chomp is right. sent11: if that the Panamanian is not syncretic and it does not chomp is not right that the sir is not a alga is not false. sent12: the fact that the rambutan is a kind of a cingulum that is not a kind of a danewort is wrong. sent13: something is a cingulum and is syncretic. sent14: the rambutan is publishable and it resets. sent15: the Panamanian is a kind of a steamer. sent16: something is unquiet and it is an anonymity if it is not a danewort. sent17: the sir does chomp if it steamers. sent18: the Panamanian is statutory if it is proprioceptive. sent19: the Panamanian is proprioceptive. sent20: if there exists something such that that the fact that it is a danewort and it is a alga is not incorrect is wrong then the Panamanian is not a kind of a danewort. sent21: if the Panamanian is proprioceptive then that it is a cingulum hold. sent22: the sir is a alga if it is not a steamer. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Panamanian is non-syncretic thing that does not chomp is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the sir is not a alga.; sent22 & sent3 -> int2: the sir is a alga.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the Panamanian is not syncretic and it does not chomp is not false.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the Panamanian is a danewort.; sent18 & sent19 -> int6: the Panamanian is statutory.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Panamanian is a danewort and is statutory.; int7 -> int8: something is a danewort and is statutory.; int8 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__