the staving exhaust occurs.
sent1: either the poise occurs or the evolutionariness happens or both. sent2: if the poise does not occur and/or the evolutionariness happens the staving exhaust does not occur. sent3: the fact that the message does not occur and the unperceptiveness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if both the poise and the deportation happens that the illicitness does not occur is right. sent5: the impinging praenomen does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the messaging does not occur and the unperceptiveness does not occur is false the fact that the permeation does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the deportation does not occur then the staving exhaust occurs and the poising occurs. sent8: the itching occurs but the half-light does not occur if the illicitness does not occur. sent9: the deportation happens. sent10: the Booleanness does not occur. sent11: the preventableness occurs and the prohibition does not occur. sent12: the tectonicness does not occur if that the counterblow does not occur and the Curietherapy does not occur is false. sent13: the impinging caltrop occurs and the half-light occurs if the permeation does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the poising occurs.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the poise and the deportation happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the illicitness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the itch but not the half-light occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the half-light does not occur is not wrong.; sent6 & sent3 -> int5: the permeation does not occur.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the impinging caltrop happens and the half-light occurs.; int6 -> int7: the half-light happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the poising does not occur is true.; int9 -> int10: the poising does not occur and/or the evolutionariness occurs.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the staving exhaust occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the staving exhaust occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: either the poise occurs or the evolutionariness happens or both. sent2: if the poise does not occur and/or the evolutionariness happens the staving exhaust does not occur. sent3: the fact that the message does not occur and the unperceptiveness does not occur does not hold. sent4: if both the poise and the deportation happens that the illicitness does not occur is right. sent5: the impinging praenomen does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the messaging does not occur and the unperceptiveness does not occur is false the fact that the permeation does not occur is not incorrect. sent7: if the deportation does not occur then the staving exhaust occurs and the poising occurs. sent8: the itching occurs but the half-light does not occur if the illicitness does not occur. sent9: the deportation happens. sent10: the Booleanness does not occur. sent11: the preventableness occurs and the prohibition does not occur. sent12: the tectonicness does not occur if that the counterblow does not occur and the Curietherapy does not occur is false. sent13: the impinging caltrop occurs and the half-light occurs if the permeation does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the poising occurs.; assump1 & sent9 -> int1: the poise and the deportation happens.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the illicitness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the itch but not the half-light occurs.; int3 -> int4: that the half-light does not occur is not wrong.; sent6 & sent3 -> int5: the permeation does not occur.; sent13 & int5 -> int6: the impinging caltrop happens and the half-light occurs.; int6 -> int7: the half-light happens.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the poising does not occur is true.; int9 -> int10: the poising does not occur and/or the evolutionariness occurs.; int10 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__