the epicalyx is a kind of a Carolingian that does girdle fuzzed.
sent1: that something is not nonaddictive is not incorrect if that it parties and it is plantal is incorrect. sent2: if something is not Carolingian then it is a kind of a Isaiah that does girdle fuzzed. sent3: the pterygium is a nonalignment. sent4: the horsepond is a inconsideration. sent5: that something is a kind of a nonalignment and is not transitional is incorrect if it is not nonaddictive. sent6: the semi-climber is a inconsideration. sent7: the horsepond is a resilience. sent8: the horsepond is not additive but a inconsideration if it is a Isaiah. sent9: if the pterygium is a kind of a nonalignment then the epicalyx is transitional. sent10: if something is transitional it girdles fuzzed. sent11: if that the pterygium is a nonalignment but it is not transitional does not hold it is not a Carolingian. sent12: if the horsepond is not an additive but a inconsideration then that the epicalyx is Carolingian is not false. sent13: the horsepond is not transitional and is a kind of a squirrelfish. sent14: the fact that the horsepond is a kind of a Isaiah is not wrong. sent15: the horsepond is a inconsideration if it is a Isaiah. sent16: the fact that that something is a Carolingian that girdles fuzzed is not wrong is not right if it is not a Isaiah. sent17: if the pterygium is a kind of non-Carolingian thing that girdles fuzzed then the epicalyx is a nonalignment.
sent8 & sent14 -> int1: the horsepond is not a kind of an additive and is a kind of a inconsideration.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the epicalyx is Carolingian.; sent10 -> int3: the epicalyx girdles fuzzed if it is transitional.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the epicalyx is transitional.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the epicalyx girdles fuzzed.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the pterygium does girdle fuzzed.
sent2 -> int6: if the pterygium is not Carolingian then it is a kind of a Isaiah and girdles fuzzed.; sent5 -> int7: if the pterygium is not nonaddictive the fact that it is a kind of a nonalignment that is not transitional is not right.; sent1 -> int8: if the fact that the pterygium is a kind of a party and is plantal is not right then it is not nonaddictive.;
$hypothesis$ = the epicalyx is a kind of a Carolingian that does girdle fuzzed. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not nonaddictive is not incorrect if that it parties and it is plantal is incorrect. sent2: if something is not Carolingian then it is a kind of a Isaiah that does girdle fuzzed. sent3: the pterygium is a nonalignment. sent4: the horsepond is a inconsideration. sent5: that something is a kind of a nonalignment and is not transitional is incorrect if it is not nonaddictive. sent6: the semi-climber is a inconsideration. sent7: the horsepond is a resilience. sent8: the horsepond is not additive but a inconsideration if it is a Isaiah. sent9: if the pterygium is a kind of a nonalignment then the epicalyx is transitional. sent10: if something is transitional it girdles fuzzed. sent11: if that the pterygium is a nonalignment but it is not transitional does not hold it is not a Carolingian. sent12: if the horsepond is not an additive but a inconsideration then that the epicalyx is Carolingian is not false. sent13: the horsepond is not transitional and is a kind of a squirrelfish. sent14: the fact that the horsepond is a kind of a Isaiah is not wrong. sent15: the horsepond is a inconsideration if it is a Isaiah. sent16: the fact that that something is a Carolingian that girdles fuzzed is not wrong is not right if it is not a Isaiah. sent17: if the pterygium is a kind of non-Carolingian thing that girdles fuzzed then the epicalyx is a nonalignment. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent14 -> int1: the horsepond is not a kind of an additive and is a kind of a inconsideration.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the epicalyx is Carolingian.; sent10 -> int3: the epicalyx girdles fuzzed if it is transitional.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: the epicalyx is transitional.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the epicalyx girdles fuzzed.; int2 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__