the laudanum is a waw and does regret.
sent1: the haemosporidian is a kind of an agora. sent2: the protection is a kind of a midden if the enate does dispose and does not become laudanum. sent3: the protection does immobilize if it is a midden. sent4: that the laudanum does regret is right if the carbamate does overprint lumberman. sent5: that the caterer does overprint lumberman but it is not a fullerene hold. sent6: if the slipstick does not dispose then the enate does dispose but it does not become laudanum. sent7: the slipstick does not dispose if the fact that the caterer does overprint Lyginopteris and is not a fullerene is wrong. sent8: if the ameba does not overprint cakewalk then the carbamate overprints lumberman. sent9: the ameba does not overprint cakewalk if the protection immobilizes. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not immobilize and it does not overprint Lyginopteris is incorrect. sent11: the enate does regret but it does not become laudanum. sent12: the laudanum is not a rechauffe but it is a kind of a waw if something is an agora. sent13: the fact that the caterer overprints Lyginopteris but it is not a fullerene does not hold.
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the slipstick does not dispose.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the enate does dispose and does not become laudanum.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the protection is a kind of a midden.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the protection immobilizes.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the ameba overprints cakewalk is incorrect.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the carbamate does overprint lumberman.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the laudanum does regret.; sent1 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a kind of an agora.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the laudanum is not a kind of a rechauffe but it is a waw.; int9 -> int10: the laudanum is a kind of a waw.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the caterer does overprint Lyginopteris and it is a two-piece.
$hypothesis$ = the laudanum is a waw and does regret. ; $context$ = sent1: the haemosporidian is a kind of an agora. sent2: the protection is a kind of a midden if the enate does dispose and does not become laudanum. sent3: the protection does immobilize if it is a midden. sent4: that the laudanum does regret is right if the carbamate does overprint lumberman. sent5: that the caterer does overprint lumberman but it is not a fullerene hold. sent6: if the slipstick does not dispose then the enate does dispose but it does not become laudanum. sent7: the slipstick does not dispose if the fact that the caterer does overprint Lyginopteris and is not a fullerene is wrong. sent8: if the ameba does not overprint cakewalk then the carbamate overprints lumberman. sent9: the ameba does not overprint cakewalk if the protection immobilizes. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it does not immobilize and it does not overprint Lyginopteris is incorrect. sent11: the enate does regret but it does not become laudanum. sent12: the laudanum is not a rechauffe but it is a kind of a waw if something is an agora. sent13: the fact that the caterer overprints Lyginopteris but it is not a fullerene does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent13 -> int1: the slipstick does not dispose.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the enate does dispose and does not become laudanum.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the protection is a kind of a midden.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the protection immobilizes.; int4 & sent9 -> int5: the fact that the ameba overprints cakewalk is incorrect.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the carbamate does overprint lumberman.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the laudanum does regret.; sent1 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a kind of an agora.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the laudanum is not a kind of a rechauffe but it is a waw.; int9 -> int10: the laudanum is a kind of a waw.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__