the breeze enlarges.
sent1: the genoise is shelflike. sent2: something is not seismological if it does not resurrect and it is shelflike. sent3: the haymaker is not amethystine. sent4: the haymaker is not a kind of a pound. sent5: the genoise does not resurrect but it is shelflike if it does scourge pillion. sent6: if that the dustcart is not non-seismological but it is not patriotic is wrong then that the Lee is amethystine is not wrong. sent7: if something does not scourge pillion that the breeze does enlarge hold. sent8: that the dustcart is seismological thing that is not patriotic is incorrect if the genoise is not seismological. sent9: there exists something such that it does scourge pillion. sent10: if the haymaker is not amethystine and it is not a pound then the Lee is not amethystine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genoise does scourge pillion.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the genoise does not resurrect but it is shelflike.; sent2 -> int2: the genoise is not seismological if that it does not resurrect and is shelflike hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the genoise is not seismological is not wrong.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that that the dustcart is seismological and is not patriotic is not false is not right.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Lee is amethystine.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the haymaker is not amethystine and is not a pound.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the Lee is not amethystine.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the genoise does not scourge pillion.; int9 -> int10: something does not scourge pillion.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the breeze enlarges. ; $context$ = sent1: the genoise is shelflike. sent2: something is not seismological if it does not resurrect and it is shelflike. sent3: the haymaker is not amethystine. sent4: the haymaker is not a kind of a pound. sent5: the genoise does not resurrect but it is shelflike if it does scourge pillion. sent6: if that the dustcart is not non-seismological but it is not patriotic is wrong then that the Lee is amethystine is not wrong. sent7: if something does not scourge pillion that the breeze does enlarge hold. sent8: that the dustcart is seismological thing that is not patriotic is incorrect if the genoise is not seismological. sent9: there exists something such that it does scourge pillion. sent10: if the haymaker is not amethystine and it is not a pound then the Lee is not amethystine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the genoise does scourge pillion.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the genoise does not resurrect but it is shelflike.; sent2 -> int2: the genoise is not seismological if that it does not resurrect and is shelflike hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the genoise is not seismological is not wrong.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that that the dustcart is seismological and is not patriotic is not false is not right.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Lee is amethystine.; sent3 & sent4 -> int6: the haymaker is not amethystine and is not a pound.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the Lee is not amethystine.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the genoise does not scourge pillion.; int9 -> int10: something does not scourge pillion.; int10 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__