that the fact that both the comprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens does not hold if the fact that the anacliticness happens is not false does not hold.
sent1: if the laxativeness does not occur then the fact that the Carolineness happens but the stirring does not occur is not right. sent2: if the uncousinliness does not occur then that the technologicalness does not occur but the encrimsoning beachwear happens is not correct. sent3: that the Pound does not occur yields the non-hostileness and/or the rally. sent4: that the non-laxativeness and the non-Marxistness occurs is brought about by that the encrimsoning beachwear does not occur. sent5: if the fact that both the cross-sectionalness and the officiation happens does not hold then the competitiveness does not occur. sent6: if the anacliticness occurs then that both the noncomprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens is incorrect. sent7: that the encrimsoning beachwear occurs is not right if that the non-technologicalness and the encrimsoning beachwear happens does not hold. sent8: that the anacliticness happens is prevented by that both the non-noncomprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens. sent9: the fact that the cross-sectionalness and the officiation happens does not hold if the proceduralness does not occur. sent10: that the congruentness and the languishing occurs is brought about by that the circumscribing strongbox does not occur. sent11: that the hysterectomy happens is prevented by the egging. sent12: if the competitiveness does not occur the egging happens and the anacliticness occurs. sent13: the fact that if the anacliticness occurs then that the comprehensiveness and the psycholinguisticsness happens does not hold is not incorrect. sent14: the counterespionage occurs if the congruentness occurs. sent15: the circumscribing strongbox does not occur if either the hostileness does not occur or the rally occurs or both. sent16: that the noncomprehensiveness does not occur but the psycholinguisticsness happens leads to the non-anacliticness. sent17: the uncousinliness is prevented by that the counterespionage happens. sent18: that that both the noncomprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens hold does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the Carolineness but not the stirring occurs is not true the proceduralness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noncomprehensiveness does not occur and the psycholinguisticsness does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the anacliticness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the anacliticness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the comprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens is wrong.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the hysterectomy does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that both the comprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens does not hold if the fact that the anacliticness happens is not false does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the laxativeness does not occur then the fact that the Carolineness happens but the stirring does not occur is not right. sent2: if the uncousinliness does not occur then that the technologicalness does not occur but the encrimsoning beachwear happens is not correct. sent3: that the Pound does not occur yields the non-hostileness and/or the rally. sent4: that the non-laxativeness and the non-Marxistness occurs is brought about by that the encrimsoning beachwear does not occur. sent5: if the fact that both the cross-sectionalness and the officiation happens does not hold then the competitiveness does not occur. sent6: if the anacliticness occurs then that both the noncomprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens is incorrect. sent7: that the encrimsoning beachwear occurs is not right if that the non-technologicalness and the encrimsoning beachwear happens does not hold. sent8: that the anacliticness happens is prevented by that both the non-noncomprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens. sent9: the fact that the cross-sectionalness and the officiation happens does not hold if the proceduralness does not occur. sent10: that the congruentness and the languishing occurs is brought about by that the circumscribing strongbox does not occur. sent11: that the hysterectomy happens is prevented by the egging. sent12: if the competitiveness does not occur the egging happens and the anacliticness occurs. sent13: the fact that if the anacliticness occurs then that the comprehensiveness and the psycholinguisticsness happens does not hold is not incorrect. sent14: the counterespionage occurs if the congruentness occurs. sent15: the circumscribing strongbox does not occur if either the hostileness does not occur or the rally occurs or both. sent16: that the noncomprehensiveness does not occur but the psycholinguisticsness happens leads to the non-anacliticness. sent17: the uncousinliness is prevented by that the counterespionage happens. sent18: that that both the noncomprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens hold does not hold. sent19: if the fact that the Carolineness but not the stirring occurs is not true the proceduralness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the noncomprehensiveness does not occur and the psycholinguisticsness does not occur.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the anacliticness does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the anacliticness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the comprehensiveness and the non-psycholinguisticsness happens is wrong.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__