the platyrrhineness does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the bleating does not occur hold then the fact that the edging Leo does not occur and/or the extending does not occur is wrong. sent2: that the platyrrhineness occurs is brought about by that the blackmailing radiobiologist happens. sent3: the blackmailing radiobiologist happens if the blackmailing Spallanzani occurs. sent4: the blackmailing Spallanzani is brought about by that the commination does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the commination does not occur and the pharmacologicalness does not occur is false then the edging Leo does not occur. sent6: the bleating does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the commination does not occur and the pharmacologicalness does not occur is not right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the edging Leo does not occur.; int1 -> int2: either the edging Leo does not occur or the extending does not occur or both.; sent1 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that that the edging Leo does not occur or the extending does not occur or both does not hold is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the commination does not occur and the pharmacologicalness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the commination does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the blackmailing Spallanzani occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the blackmailing radiobiologist occurs.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the platyrrhineness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the bleating does not occur hold then the fact that the edging Leo does not occur and/or the extending does not occur is wrong. sent2: that the platyrrhineness occurs is brought about by that the blackmailing radiobiologist happens. sent3: the blackmailing radiobiologist happens if the blackmailing Spallanzani occurs. sent4: the blackmailing Spallanzani is brought about by that the commination does not occur. sent5: if the fact that the commination does not occur and the pharmacologicalness does not occur is false then the edging Leo does not occur. sent6: the bleating does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the commination does not occur and the pharmacologicalness does not occur is not right.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the edging Leo does not occur.; int1 -> int2: either the edging Leo does not occur or the extending does not occur or both.; sent1 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that that the edging Leo does not occur or the extending does not occur or both does not hold is correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the commination does not occur and the pharmacologicalness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the commination does not occur.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the blackmailing Spallanzani occurs.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the blackmailing radiobiologist occurs.; int8 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__