the fact that the bitmap is autobiographical but it is not a algin is incorrect.
sent1: the civet does bathe club if the bitmap is autobiographical but it is not a algin. sent2: the fact that the tick is a kind of a forgetfulness and is a relegation is not correct if something is distinguishable. sent3: the fact that the bitmap is autobiographical is right. sent4: the ramp does luxuriate Cousteau or it is a kind of a fascism or both if there is something such that the fact that it is a thermogram is not wrong. sent5: if something is not a kind of a photosynthesis then it does permeate and is not a fascism. sent6: the tick is a Brinton and not a chilblain. sent7: the focalization is a kind of a thermogram. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is distinguishable or it does not bathe club or both is not right then the electrometer is not a photosynthesis. sent9: if the civet is a kind of a photosynthesis then the allosaur is distinguishable. sent10: the crackle is guttural if there exists something such that the fact that it is a forgetfulness that is a relegation is false. sent11: the allosaur is not a thermogram if the tick is both a Brinton and not a chilblain. sent12: the bitmap is a forgetfulness if the civet is a relegation. sent13: the civet is a forgetfulness and a relegation if the allosaur is not guttural. sent14: if the bitmap is a kind of a forgetfulness then the fact that it is distinguishable and/or does not bathe club is not true. sent15: something is autobiographical if it is a kind of a forgetfulness. sent16: if the civet is a forgetfulness the bitmap is a forgetfulness. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a forgetfulness then the crackle is not non-guttural. sent18: the civet is a relegation. sent19: if something does bathe club then it is a kind of a photosynthesis.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitmap is autobiographical and is not a algin.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the civet bathes club.; sent19 -> int2: if the civet does bathe club it is a kind of a photosynthesis.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the civet is a photosynthesis.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the allosaur is distinguishable.; int4 -> int5: something is distinguishable.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the tick is a kind of a forgetfulness and is a relegation is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a forgetfulness and is a kind of a relegation does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the crackle is guttural.; sent7 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a thermogram.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the ramp does luxuriate Cousteau or is a fascism or both.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it luxuriates Cousteau and/or it is a fascism.;
the bitmap is autobiographical but it is not a algin.
sent15 -> int12: the bitmap is autobiographical if it is a kind of a forgetfulness.; sent12 & sent18 -> int13: the bitmap is a forgetfulness.; int12 & int13 -> int14: the bitmap is autobiographical.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the bitmap is autobiographical but it is not a algin is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the civet does bathe club if the bitmap is autobiographical but it is not a algin. sent2: the fact that the tick is a kind of a forgetfulness and is a relegation is not correct if something is distinguishable. sent3: the fact that the bitmap is autobiographical is right. sent4: the ramp does luxuriate Cousteau or it is a kind of a fascism or both if there is something such that the fact that it is a thermogram is not wrong. sent5: if something is not a kind of a photosynthesis then it does permeate and is not a fascism. sent6: the tick is a Brinton and not a chilblain. sent7: the focalization is a kind of a thermogram. sent8: if there is something such that the fact that it is distinguishable or it does not bathe club or both is not right then the electrometer is not a photosynthesis. sent9: if the civet is a kind of a photosynthesis then the allosaur is distinguishable. sent10: the crackle is guttural if there exists something such that the fact that it is a forgetfulness that is a relegation is false. sent11: the allosaur is not a thermogram if the tick is both a Brinton and not a chilblain. sent12: the bitmap is a forgetfulness if the civet is a relegation. sent13: the civet is a forgetfulness and a relegation if the allosaur is not guttural. sent14: if the bitmap is a kind of a forgetfulness then the fact that it is distinguishable and/or does not bathe club is not true. sent15: something is autobiographical if it is a kind of a forgetfulness. sent16: if the civet is a forgetfulness the bitmap is a forgetfulness. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a forgetfulness then the crackle is not non-guttural. sent18: the civet is a relegation. sent19: if something does bathe club then it is a kind of a photosynthesis. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitmap is autobiographical and is not a algin.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the civet bathes club.; sent19 -> int2: if the civet does bathe club it is a kind of a photosynthesis.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the civet is a photosynthesis.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the allosaur is distinguishable.; int4 -> int5: something is distinguishable.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the fact that the tick is a kind of a forgetfulness and is a relegation is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it is a forgetfulness and is a kind of a relegation does not hold.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the crackle is guttural.; sent7 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a thermogram.; int9 & sent4 -> int10: the ramp does luxuriate Cousteau or is a fascism or both.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it luxuriates Cousteau and/or it is a fascism.; __UNKNOWN__