that the Kahlua is not a minuteness and is not a kind of a Kant is not true.
sent1: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Ichthyosauridae and is not a RUF does not hold hold. sent2: the ductule is a RUF if there is something such that that it is not a Ichthyosauridae and it is not a RUF is incorrect. sent3: the ductule is a kind of a cover and it does gripe midiron. sent4: the Kahlua is a lek. sent5: if that something does not gripe midiron and it does not gripe Shostakovich is false it covers. sent6: the Kahlua is not a Kant if the ductule does gripe Shostakovich and it is a RUF. sent7: the solute is not inguinal if there is something such that that it is a kind of an outside that does not gripe butter is false. sent8: the fact that something is not a minuteness and is not a kind of a Kant does not hold if it is not a cover. sent9: the Kahlua is not a minuteness if there exists something such that the fact that it is a lek that is not inguinal does not hold. sent10: if the ductule does gripe midiron then it does gripe Shostakovich. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not gripe Shostakovich and it is a Kant is false. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a lek and it is not inguinal does not hold.
sent3 -> int1: the ductule does gripe midiron.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the ductule gripes Shostakovich.; sent1 & sent2 -> int3: the ductule is a RUF.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ductule gripes Shostakovich and is a RUF.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Kahlua is not a Kant.; sent12 & sent9 -> int6: the Kahlua is not a minuteness.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Kahlua is not a kind of a minuteness and it is not a Kant does not hold.
sent8 -> int7: if the Kahlua does not cover that it is not a minuteness and it is not a kind of a Kant is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Kahlua is not a minuteness and is not a kind of a Kant is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a Ichthyosauridae and is not a RUF does not hold hold. sent2: the ductule is a RUF if there is something such that that it is not a Ichthyosauridae and it is not a RUF is incorrect. sent3: the ductule is a kind of a cover and it does gripe midiron. sent4: the Kahlua is a lek. sent5: if that something does not gripe midiron and it does not gripe Shostakovich is false it covers. sent6: the Kahlua is not a Kant if the ductule does gripe Shostakovich and it is a RUF. sent7: the solute is not inguinal if there is something such that that it is a kind of an outside that does not gripe butter is false. sent8: the fact that something is not a minuteness and is not a kind of a Kant does not hold if it is not a cover. sent9: the Kahlua is not a minuteness if there exists something such that the fact that it is a lek that is not inguinal does not hold. sent10: if the ductule does gripe midiron then it does gripe Shostakovich. sent11: there exists something such that the fact that it does not gripe Shostakovich and it is a Kant is false. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a lek and it is not inguinal does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the ductule does gripe midiron.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the ductule gripes Shostakovich.; sent1 & sent2 -> int3: the ductule is a RUF.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ductule gripes Shostakovich and is a RUF.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the Kahlua is not a Kant.; sent12 & sent9 -> int6: the Kahlua is not a minuteness.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__