there is something such that if it is a kind of a Heshvan and it is centripetal it is not a Nicklaus.
sent1: if the sulfisoxazole is centripetal and it is neckless then it is not biogeographic. sent2: there exists something such that if it does reveal and is woolen then it is not a kind of a wheedler. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Heshvan that is centripetal then it is a Nicklaus. sent4: there is something such that if it is millennial and it is adequate then it is not anabatic. sent5: the sporangium is not a tank if it is centripetal and it is anabatic. sent6: if something that fits inkblot is centripetal it is not alive. sent7: there exists something such that if it is an intonation and it is a kind of a ultramicroscope then it does not bedizen collet. sent8: there is something such that if it is a template and contorts Pygmy it is not mechanistic. sent9: the sporangium is not a Nicklaus if it is a Heshvan and is centripetal. sent10: the sporangium is a Nicklaus if it is a Heshvan and centripetal. sent11: there exists something such that if it does contort Proteus and is a kind of a wheedler then the fact that it is not a kind of a Gerbera is true.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
if that the sporangium does fit inkblot and is centripetal is not wrong then it is not alive.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is a kind of a Heshvan and it is centripetal it is not a Nicklaus. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sulfisoxazole is centripetal and it is neckless then it is not biogeographic. sent2: there exists something such that if it does reveal and is woolen then it is not a kind of a wheedler. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a Heshvan that is centripetal then it is a Nicklaus. sent4: there is something such that if it is millennial and it is adequate then it is not anabatic. sent5: the sporangium is not a tank if it is centripetal and it is anabatic. sent6: if something that fits inkblot is centripetal it is not alive. sent7: there exists something such that if it is an intonation and it is a kind of a ultramicroscope then it does not bedizen collet. sent8: there is something such that if it is a template and contorts Pygmy it is not mechanistic. sent9: the sporangium is not a Nicklaus if it is a Heshvan and is centripetal. sent10: the sporangium is a Nicklaus if it is a Heshvan and centripetal. sent11: there exists something such that if it does contort Proteus and is a kind of a wheedler then the fact that it is not a kind of a Gerbera is true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__