the wide-body is not radiopaque.
sent1: if something is a kind of a wonder or it does rerun stabber or both it is not a anticholinesterase. sent2: if the fact that the wide-body is not a kind of an associate is right then it is asymptotic and it reruns stabber. sent3: if the Surrey unstraps psychrometer but it is not an age then it is not a Aramus. sent4: the Surrey does not unstrap psychrometer. sent5: the fact that the wide-body is analogue is correct if the Surrey is not radiopaque but it reruns abhenry. sent6: the Surrey does not unstrap psychrometer and it is not an age. sent7: if that the Surrey is not a kind of a nabob and/or it is a pacification does not hold then the bridesmaid does not rerun abhenry. sent8: the larch is not a splice and is not a kind of an analogue. sent9: The abhenry reruns laudator. sent10: the nevirapine is radiopaque. sent11: that the heterograft is a Aramus hold. sent12: the wide-body is radiopaque if the fact that the Surrey is not a kind of a Aramus but it is an analogue is not false. sent13: the laudator is not dermal and it is not chromatographic. sent14: something is a kind of radiopaque a Aramus if it does not rerun abhenry. sent15: if something is a kind of a Aramus it is not non-analogue. sent16: the voice is not discordant and it is not a kind of a hookup. sent17: the wide-body is not a kind of an associate. sent18: if the Surrey does not unstrap psychrometer and it is not an age it is not a Aramus. sent19: the laudator is radiopaque. sent20: the laudator reruns abhenry. sent21: the Surrey is an analogue if the laudator does rerun abhenry. sent22: the wide-body is not an age. sent23: if the fact that there exists something such that it is not a kind of a anticholinesterase is not false then that either the Surrey is not a nabob or it is a kind of a pacification or both is wrong. sent24: the Surrey reruns Nicaraguan.
sent18 & sent6 -> int1: the Surrey is not a Aramus.; sent21 & sent20 -> int2: the Surrey is analogue.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Surrey is not a Aramus but an analogue.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bridesmaid is a kind of an analogue is not false.
sent15 -> int4: if the bridesmaid is a Aramus it is an analogue.; sent14 -> int5: the bridesmaid is both radiopaque and a Aramus if it does not rerun abhenry.; sent1 -> int6: if the wide-body is a kind of a wonder and/or it reruns stabber then it is not a anticholinesterase.; sent2 & sent17 -> int7: the wide-body is asymptotic and it reruns stabber.; int7 -> int8: the wide-body reruns stabber.; int8 -> int9: the wide-body is a wonder or it does rerun stabber or both.; int6 & int9 -> int10: the wide-body is not a anticholinesterase.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is not a anticholinesterase.; int11 & sent23 -> int12: the fact that the Surrey is not a nabob and/or is a pacification is not true.; sent7 & int12 -> int13: the bridesmaid does not rerun abhenry.; int5 & int13 -> int14: the bridesmaid is a kind of radiopaque a Aramus.; int14 -> int15: the bridesmaid is a Aramus.; int4 & int15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wide-body is not radiopaque. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a wonder or it does rerun stabber or both it is not a anticholinesterase. sent2: if the fact that the wide-body is not a kind of an associate is right then it is asymptotic and it reruns stabber. sent3: if the Surrey unstraps psychrometer but it is not an age then it is not a Aramus. sent4: the Surrey does not unstrap psychrometer. sent5: the fact that the wide-body is analogue is correct if the Surrey is not radiopaque but it reruns abhenry. sent6: the Surrey does not unstrap psychrometer and it is not an age. sent7: if that the Surrey is not a kind of a nabob and/or it is a pacification does not hold then the bridesmaid does not rerun abhenry. sent8: the larch is not a splice and is not a kind of an analogue. sent9: The abhenry reruns laudator. sent10: the nevirapine is radiopaque. sent11: that the heterograft is a Aramus hold. sent12: the wide-body is radiopaque if the fact that the Surrey is not a kind of a Aramus but it is an analogue is not false. sent13: the laudator is not dermal and it is not chromatographic. sent14: something is a kind of radiopaque a Aramus if it does not rerun abhenry. sent15: if something is a kind of a Aramus it is not non-analogue. sent16: the voice is not discordant and it is not a kind of a hookup. sent17: the wide-body is not a kind of an associate. sent18: if the Surrey does not unstrap psychrometer and it is not an age it is not a Aramus. sent19: the laudator is radiopaque. sent20: the laudator reruns abhenry. sent21: the Surrey is an analogue if the laudator does rerun abhenry. sent22: the wide-body is not an age. sent23: if the fact that there exists something such that it is not a kind of a anticholinesterase is not false then that either the Surrey is not a nabob or it is a kind of a pacification or both is wrong. sent24: the Surrey reruns Nicaraguan. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent6 -> int1: the Surrey is not a Aramus.; sent21 & sent20 -> int2: the Surrey is analogue.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Surrey is not a Aramus but an analogue.; int3 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__