the guayule is not a shipside.
sent1: if the liftman hashes skimming then the gildhall does hashes skimming. sent2: if that the legging does not oppose ratio is not false the liftman is agricultural and a jati. sent3: the lineation is fishy and does not commentate if it is ethical. sent4: the fact that something does not accord timidity and it does not accord ribgrass is not true if the fact that it is not a meterstick is correct. sent5: if the gildhall hashes skimming then the fact that it is a meterstick is not false. sent6: if the fact that the wolffish is not a shipside but it accords timidity is false then the fact that the guayule is not a shipside is not wrong. sent7: that something does not accord ribgrass and it is not a censor does not hold if it does not accord timidity. sent8: the oligosaccharide does not accord timidity but it hashes skimming. sent9: the pleximeter is a meterstick. sent10: that the wolffish does not confederate menace and is not a meterstick does not hold. sent11: something hashes skimming if it is agricultural. sent12: if the wolffish is a kind of a meterstick the guayule is a kind of a shipside. sent13: the lineation is ethical. sent14: the wolffish is a censor if the oligosaccharide is a meterstick. sent15: the oligosaccharide is a kind of a shipside. sent16: the wolffish is a meterstick if that the oligosaccharide does not accord ribgrass and it is not a censor is false.
sent7 -> int1: if the oligosaccharide does not accord timidity then that it does not accord ribgrass and it is not a censor is false.; sent8 -> int2: the oligosaccharide does not accord timidity.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the oligosaccharide does not accord ribgrass and it does not censor does not hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the wolffish is a meterstick.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the guayule is not a shipside.
sent11 -> int5: if the liftman is agricultural then it hashes skimming.; sent3 & sent13 -> int6: the lineation is fishy and does not commentate.; int6 -> int7: something is fishy but it does not commentate.;
$hypothesis$ = the guayule is not a shipside. ; $context$ = sent1: if the liftman hashes skimming then the gildhall does hashes skimming. sent2: if that the legging does not oppose ratio is not false the liftman is agricultural and a jati. sent3: the lineation is fishy and does not commentate if it is ethical. sent4: the fact that something does not accord timidity and it does not accord ribgrass is not true if the fact that it is not a meterstick is correct. sent5: if the gildhall hashes skimming then the fact that it is a meterstick is not false. sent6: if the fact that the wolffish is not a shipside but it accords timidity is false then the fact that the guayule is not a shipside is not wrong. sent7: that something does not accord ribgrass and it is not a censor does not hold if it does not accord timidity. sent8: the oligosaccharide does not accord timidity but it hashes skimming. sent9: the pleximeter is a meterstick. sent10: that the wolffish does not confederate menace and is not a meterstick does not hold. sent11: something hashes skimming if it is agricultural. sent12: if the wolffish is a kind of a meterstick the guayule is a kind of a shipside. sent13: the lineation is ethical. sent14: the wolffish is a censor if the oligosaccharide is a meterstick. sent15: the oligosaccharide is a kind of a shipside. sent16: the wolffish is a meterstick if that the oligosaccharide does not accord ribgrass and it is not a censor is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the oligosaccharide does not accord timidity then that it does not accord ribgrass and it is not a censor is false.; sent8 -> int2: the oligosaccharide does not accord timidity.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the oligosaccharide does not accord ribgrass and it does not censor does not hold.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: the wolffish is a meterstick.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__