the blotter is not a cabal.
sent1: something is diamantine and it is a Mackem if it is not semiparasitic. sent2: there exists something such that it does not encrimson cracking. sent3: the blotter is a miscarriage if it is epizoan. sent4: the fact that the blotter embodies and does bestrew acetaldehyde is false. sent5: something is not a kind of a buyer if it encrimsons cracking and does not embody. sent6: the blotter is epizoan. sent7: something that is diamantine is not planktonic or is semiparasitic or both. sent8: something does encrimson cracking if the fact that it does not encrimson cracking and it does bestrew acetaldehyde is false. sent9: if something is a kind of a miscarriage and/or it is a kind of a Mackem the heterostracan does not encrimson Sango. sent10: that the blotter encrimsons Sango and is planktonic does not hold. sent11: the epicanthus does not bestrew acetaldehyde. sent12: the blotter is not semiparasitic if it is planktonic. sent13: the fact that the fact that the fact that the blotter does embody and does not bestrew acetaldehyde is incorrect hold if there is something such that it does not encrimson cracking is not false. sent14: that the acetaldehyde is non-semiparasitic thing that encrimsons Sango is wrong. sent15: if that that the blotter embodies and does not bestrew acetaldehyde is false is right then it is not non-cinerary. sent16: the fact that the blotter does encrimson Sango and is not planktonic is not true if it is cinerary. sent17: if the acetaldehyde either is not cinerary or does not embody or both then the trowel does not embody. sent18: the fact that something does not encrimson cracking and does bestrew acetaldehyde is wrong if it does not encrimson Sango. sent19: the blotter is not semiparasitic if the fact that it encrimsons Sango and is non-planktonic is not correct. sent20: the fact that the roadkill bestrews ceilidh and it is hexadecimal does not hold if it does encrimson Sango. sent21: if the acetaldehyde does not encrimson Sango it is not cinerary and/or does not embody. sent22: there exists something such that it encrimsons cracking. sent23: the blotter is a cabal if it is a Mackem. sent24: the blotter encrimsons resoluteness if it is continual. sent25: if there is something such that it is a cabal or is diamantine or both then the heterostracan is diamantine. sent26: the fact that the trowel is diamantine is true. sent27: that the acetaldehyde encrimsons Sango does not hold if that it is not semiparasitic and encrimsons Sango is not right.
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: that the blotter embodies and does not bestrew acetaldehyde is not right.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: that the blotter is cinerary is not incorrect.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the fact that the blotter does encrimson Sango and is not planktonic is not true.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the blotter is not semiparasitic.; sent1 -> int5: that if the blotter is not semiparasitic the blotter is diamantine and it is a Mackem is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the blotter is diamantine and a Mackem.; int6 -> int7: the blotter is a Mackem.; int7 & sent23 -> hypothesis;
the blotter is not a kind of a cabal.
sent27 & sent14 -> int8: the acetaldehyde does not encrimson Sango.; sent21 & int8 -> int9: the acetaldehyde is not cinerary or it does not embody or both.; sent17 & int9 -> int10: the trowel does not embody.; sent11 -> int11: something does not bestrew acetaldehyde.;
$hypothesis$ = the blotter is not a cabal. ; $context$ = sent1: something is diamantine and it is a Mackem if it is not semiparasitic. sent2: there exists something such that it does not encrimson cracking. sent3: the blotter is a miscarriage if it is epizoan. sent4: the fact that the blotter embodies and does bestrew acetaldehyde is false. sent5: something is not a kind of a buyer if it encrimsons cracking and does not embody. sent6: the blotter is epizoan. sent7: something that is diamantine is not planktonic or is semiparasitic or both. sent8: something does encrimson cracking if the fact that it does not encrimson cracking and it does bestrew acetaldehyde is false. sent9: if something is a kind of a miscarriage and/or it is a kind of a Mackem the heterostracan does not encrimson Sango. sent10: that the blotter encrimsons Sango and is planktonic does not hold. sent11: the epicanthus does not bestrew acetaldehyde. sent12: the blotter is not semiparasitic if it is planktonic. sent13: the fact that the fact that the fact that the blotter does embody and does not bestrew acetaldehyde is incorrect hold if there is something such that it does not encrimson cracking is not false. sent14: that the acetaldehyde is non-semiparasitic thing that encrimsons Sango is wrong. sent15: if that that the blotter embodies and does not bestrew acetaldehyde is false is right then it is not non-cinerary. sent16: the fact that the blotter does encrimson Sango and is not planktonic is not true if it is cinerary. sent17: if the acetaldehyde either is not cinerary or does not embody or both then the trowel does not embody. sent18: the fact that something does not encrimson cracking and does bestrew acetaldehyde is wrong if it does not encrimson Sango. sent19: the blotter is not semiparasitic if the fact that it encrimsons Sango and is non-planktonic is not correct. sent20: the fact that the roadkill bestrews ceilidh and it is hexadecimal does not hold if it does encrimson Sango. sent21: if the acetaldehyde does not encrimson Sango it is not cinerary and/or does not embody. sent22: there exists something such that it encrimsons cracking. sent23: the blotter is a cabal if it is a Mackem. sent24: the blotter encrimsons resoluteness if it is continual. sent25: if there is something such that it is a cabal or is diamantine or both then the heterostracan is diamantine. sent26: the fact that the trowel is diamantine is true. sent27: that the acetaldehyde encrimsons Sango does not hold if that it is not semiparasitic and encrimsons Sango is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent13 -> int1: that the blotter embodies and does not bestrew acetaldehyde is not right.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: that the blotter is cinerary is not incorrect.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the fact that the blotter does encrimson Sango and is not planktonic is not true.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the blotter is not semiparasitic.; sent1 -> int5: that if the blotter is not semiparasitic the blotter is diamantine and it is a Mackem is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the blotter is diamantine and a Mackem.; int6 -> int7: the blotter is a Mackem.; int7 & sent23 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__