the Gore occurs.
sent1: if the look occurs that the fact that the tenpins occurs but the cantillation does not occur is false is true. sent2: if the seductiveness occurs then the extralinguisticness occurs. sent3: the smiting tetrasporangium happens. sent4: the charlatanism happens if the fact that the enumerating but not the staining occurs is not right. sent5: that the unpaidness but not the aerobicsness happens does not hold if that the palatoglossalness happens is not incorrect. sent6: the Gore does not occur if the whistling Esocidae happens. sent7: if the fact that the tenpins occurs but the cantillation does not occur is wrong the palatoglossalness happens. sent8: the whistling Esocidae occurs if the aerobicsness occurs. sent9: the smiting pheniramine occurs and the Czech happens. sent10: that the Czechness occurs leads to that the unpaidness occurs. sent11: the fact that the look occurs hold.
sent9 -> int1: that the Czech happens is right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the unpaidness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aerobicsness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the unpaidness occurs but the aerobicsness does not occur.; sent1 & sent11 -> int4: that the tenpins but not the cantillation happens is incorrect.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the palatoglossalness happens.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the unpaidness but not the aerobicsness occurs does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the aerobicsness happens is not wrong.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the whistling Esocidae happens.; int9 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Gore occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the look occurs that the fact that the tenpins occurs but the cantillation does not occur is false is true. sent2: if the seductiveness occurs then the extralinguisticness occurs. sent3: the smiting tetrasporangium happens. sent4: the charlatanism happens if the fact that the enumerating but not the staining occurs is not right. sent5: that the unpaidness but not the aerobicsness happens does not hold if that the palatoglossalness happens is not incorrect. sent6: the Gore does not occur if the whistling Esocidae happens. sent7: if the fact that the tenpins occurs but the cantillation does not occur is wrong the palatoglossalness happens. sent8: the whistling Esocidae occurs if the aerobicsness occurs. sent9: the smiting pheniramine occurs and the Czech happens. sent10: that the Czechness occurs leads to that the unpaidness occurs. sent11: the fact that the look occurs hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: that the Czech happens is right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the unpaidness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the aerobicsness does not occur.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the unpaidness occurs but the aerobicsness does not occur.; sent1 & sent11 -> int4: that the tenpins but not the cantillation happens is incorrect.; sent7 & int4 -> int5: the palatoglossalness happens.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the unpaidness but not the aerobicsness occurs does not hold.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fact that the aerobicsness happens is not wrong.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the whistling Esocidae happens.; int9 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__