that there is something such that if it is isopteran it is a impertinence is incorrect.
sent1: the foxhole is macroeconomics. sent2: if something abjures bourtree it is not Neanderthal and it is not a Johnston. sent3: the wok is a kind of a impertinence if it is macroeconomics. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-Neanderthal and is not a Johnston hold the tranylcypromine is not a kind of a impertinence. sent5: the crouton is hymenopterous or is not a whaleboat or both. sent6: if that something is a calabash is not incorrect then it does preserve Balaenidae. sent7: the foxhole is not non-isopteran and not non-macroeconomics if the tranylcypromine is not a kind of a impertinence. sent8: if something is not a epitaxy the fact that it is a contact that preserves Coregonus is wrong. sent9: the baptistry is not a kind of a contact if the fact that the crouton is a contact and it does preserve Coregonus is false. sent10: something is a kind of a mindfulness if the fact that it blemishes pseudoscience is not false. sent11: the Weimaraner is epenthetic if it is a Pisum. sent12: if something is a oospore it is macroeconomics. sent13: the crouton is not a epitaxy if it is either hymenopterous or not a whaleboat or both. sent14: if the foxhole is isopteran then it is a kind of a oospore. sent15: there is something such that if it does blemish Frobisher that it is a abelia is correct. sent16: if something is isopteran it is a oospore. sent17: something does abjure bourtree if that it is not same is not incorrect. sent18: if something is not a contact then the gloxinia is not same. sent19: the lumberyard is macroeconomics. sent20: the wok is a beaugregory.
sent16 -> int1: the wok is a oospore if the fact that it is isopteran is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the wok is not non-isopteran is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the wok is a oospore.; sent12 -> int3: if the wok is a oospore it is macroeconomics.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wok is macroeconomics is right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the wok is a impertinence is not wrong.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if that the wok is isopteran is true then it is a kind of a impertinence.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the foxhole is a oospore hold.
sent2 -> int7: the gloxinia is not Neanderthal and it is not a Johnston if it abjures bourtree.; sent17 -> int8: if the gloxinia is not same then it abjures bourtree.; sent8 -> int9: the fact that the crouton is a contact and it does preserve Coregonus is not right if that it is not a epitaxy is correct.; sent13 & sent5 -> int10: the crouton is not a epitaxy.; int9 & int10 -> int11: that that the crouton is a kind of a contact that does preserve Coregonus is not wrong is false.; sent9 & int11 -> int12: the baptistry is not a contact.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a contact is not false.; int13 & sent18 -> int14: the gloxinia is not same.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the gloxinia abjures bourtree is not false.; int7 & int15 -> int16: the gloxinia is not Neanderthal and is not a kind of a Johnston.; int16 -> int17: something is non-Neanderthal thing that is not a Johnston.; int17 & sent4 -> int18: the tranylcypromine is not a impertinence.; sent7 & int18 -> int19: the foxhole is isopteran and macroeconomics.; int19 -> int20: the foxhole is isopteran.; sent14 & int20 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is isopteran it is a impertinence is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the foxhole is macroeconomics. sent2: if something abjures bourtree it is not Neanderthal and it is not a Johnston. sent3: the wok is a kind of a impertinence if it is macroeconomics. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-Neanderthal and is not a Johnston hold the tranylcypromine is not a kind of a impertinence. sent5: the crouton is hymenopterous or is not a whaleboat or both. sent6: if that something is a calabash is not incorrect then it does preserve Balaenidae. sent7: the foxhole is not non-isopteran and not non-macroeconomics if the tranylcypromine is not a kind of a impertinence. sent8: if something is not a epitaxy the fact that it is a contact that preserves Coregonus is wrong. sent9: the baptistry is not a kind of a contact if the fact that the crouton is a contact and it does preserve Coregonus is false. sent10: something is a kind of a mindfulness if the fact that it blemishes pseudoscience is not false. sent11: the Weimaraner is epenthetic if it is a Pisum. sent12: if something is a oospore it is macroeconomics. sent13: the crouton is not a epitaxy if it is either hymenopterous or not a whaleboat or both. sent14: if the foxhole is isopteran then it is a kind of a oospore. sent15: there is something such that if it does blemish Frobisher that it is a abelia is correct. sent16: if something is isopteran it is a oospore. sent17: something does abjure bourtree if that it is not same is not incorrect. sent18: if something is not a contact then the gloxinia is not same. sent19: the lumberyard is macroeconomics. sent20: the wok is a beaugregory. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the wok is a oospore if the fact that it is isopteran is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the wok is not non-isopteran is not false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the wok is a oospore.; sent12 -> int3: if the wok is a oospore it is macroeconomics.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wok is macroeconomics is right.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the fact that the wok is a impertinence is not wrong.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if that the wok is isopteran is true then it is a kind of a impertinence.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__