the aerie is a kind of a ngwee.
sent1: the aerie is indusial. sent2: the aerie is inflectional and it repines AWOL. sent3: if the malope is a Sicilian that leans it is not a Tabriz. sent4: if the AWOL is not a ngwee then it is indusial and does lean. sent5: the fact that the aerie is a kind of a ngwee is not incorrect if the AWOL is leaning. sent6: the fact that the aerie is campanulate is not wrong. sent7: something revalues and it is cross-modal if that it does not repine Vipera hold. sent8: if something is leaning thing that is irreparable it is not a ngwee. sent9: if something is not a kind of a ngwee it is indusial and it is leaning. sent10: something that does not singularize purl is a kind of leaning thing that is indusial. sent11: the aerie is leaning. sent12: the AWOL is a sliminess. sent13: a non-imperial thing is splenic. sent14: that the AWOL is a ngwee is correct if the aerie is a sliminess. sent15: the colorimeter is irreparable. sent16: the AWOL is irreparable. sent17: the fact that if the AWOL is leaning and it is a kind of the ngwee the AWOL is not indusial is not wrong. sent18: the drink is a ngwee. sent19: that if something is irreparable and it is a kind of a sliminess then it does not singularize purl is not incorrect. sent20: that the AWOL does melanize malope hold. sent21: the seatbelt is a sliminess that singularizes tinning.
sent16 & sent12 -> int1: the AWOL is irreparable and a sliminess.; sent19 -> int2: if the AWOL is irreparable and it is a sliminess then that it does not singularize purl hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the AWOL does not singularize purl.; sent10 -> int4: if the AWOL does not singularize purl it is a kind of leaning thing that is indusial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the AWOL leans and it is indusial.; int5 -> int6: the AWOL leans.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the framing singularizes purl.
$hypothesis$ = the aerie is a kind of a ngwee. ; $context$ = sent1: the aerie is indusial. sent2: the aerie is inflectional and it repines AWOL. sent3: if the malope is a Sicilian that leans it is not a Tabriz. sent4: if the AWOL is not a ngwee then it is indusial and does lean. sent5: the fact that the aerie is a kind of a ngwee is not incorrect if the AWOL is leaning. sent6: the fact that the aerie is campanulate is not wrong. sent7: something revalues and it is cross-modal if that it does not repine Vipera hold. sent8: if something is leaning thing that is irreparable it is not a ngwee. sent9: if something is not a kind of a ngwee it is indusial and it is leaning. sent10: something that does not singularize purl is a kind of leaning thing that is indusial. sent11: the aerie is leaning. sent12: the AWOL is a sliminess. sent13: a non-imperial thing is splenic. sent14: that the AWOL is a ngwee is correct if the aerie is a sliminess. sent15: the colorimeter is irreparable. sent16: the AWOL is irreparable. sent17: the fact that if the AWOL is leaning and it is a kind of the ngwee the AWOL is not indusial is not wrong. sent18: the drink is a ngwee. sent19: that if something is irreparable and it is a kind of a sliminess then it does not singularize purl is not incorrect. sent20: that the AWOL does melanize malope hold. sent21: the seatbelt is a sliminess that singularizes tinning. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent12 -> int1: the AWOL is irreparable and a sliminess.; sent19 -> int2: if the AWOL is irreparable and it is a sliminess then that it does not singularize purl hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the AWOL does not singularize purl.; sent10 -> int4: if the AWOL does not singularize purl it is a kind of leaning thing that is indusial.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the AWOL leans and it is indusial.; int5 -> int6: the AWOL leans.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__