that that the naprapathy does not occur brings about that the priming resuscitation and the gating two-piece occurs is false.
sent1: the wresting coprophagy occurs if that the favorableness does not occur and the naprapathy does not occur is wrong. sent2: that the intrusiveness and the priming silverbush occurs is brought about by the pistillateness. sent3: that the rainstorm does not occur but the minister happens is not true. sent4: the favorableness does not occur. sent5: the promotion happens. sent6: that the rainstorm does not occur and the ministering does not occur is wrong. sent7: the redeye occurs. sent8: that both the gating flooring and the occupationalness happens is brought about by that the intrusiveness does not occur. sent9: that the formulation happens is right if that the favorableness happens hold. sent10: if that not the ratting but the unnaturalness happens does not hold the vent occurs. sent11: that the gating concubine does not occur but the difference occurs is incorrect. sent12: if that not the priming dysgenesis but the achromatizing moa happens is wrong then the achromatizing deep-freeze happens. sent13: the fact that that the rainstorm but not the minister happens hold is wrong. sent14: if the ontogeneticness does not occur the minister and the rainstorm happens. sent15: the fact that the Galileanness does not occur and the Independence does not occur is wrong. sent16: the fact that the newspeak does not occur and the gating flooring does not occur does not hold. sent17: if the favorableness occurs the gating two-piece occurs. sent18: the tapotement does not occur. sent19: that not the gating concubine but the cartwheel occurs is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the favorableness and the naprapathy occurs is incorrect. sent21: the priming resuscitation happens if the fact that the rainstorm does not occur and the ministering does not occur is incorrect. sent22: the gating two-piece occurs if the fact that the fact that both the non-favorableness and the naprapathy happens is right does not hold. sent23: if the priming aldehyde does not occur not the ontogeneticness but the digressing happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unfavorableness and the naprapathy happens.; assump1 -> int1: the naprapathy happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the naprapathy does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the favorableness does not occur but the naprapathy happens is incorrect.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the gating two-piece occurs.; sent21 & sent6 -> int5: the priming resuscitation occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the priming resuscitation occurs and the gating two-piece happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis;
the wresting coprophagy occurs.
$hypothesis$ = that that the naprapathy does not occur brings about that the priming resuscitation and the gating two-piece occurs is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the wresting coprophagy occurs if that the favorableness does not occur and the naprapathy does not occur is wrong. sent2: that the intrusiveness and the priming silverbush occurs is brought about by the pistillateness. sent3: that the rainstorm does not occur but the minister happens is not true. sent4: the favorableness does not occur. sent5: the promotion happens. sent6: that the rainstorm does not occur and the ministering does not occur is wrong. sent7: the redeye occurs. sent8: that both the gating flooring and the occupationalness happens is brought about by that the intrusiveness does not occur. sent9: that the formulation happens is right if that the favorableness happens hold. sent10: if that not the ratting but the unnaturalness happens does not hold the vent occurs. sent11: that the gating concubine does not occur but the difference occurs is incorrect. sent12: if that not the priming dysgenesis but the achromatizing moa happens is wrong then the achromatizing deep-freeze happens. sent13: the fact that that the rainstorm but not the minister happens hold is wrong. sent14: if the ontogeneticness does not occur the minister and the rainstorm happens. sent15: the fact that the Galileanness does not occur and the Independence does not occur is wrong. sent16: the fact that the newspeak does not occur and the gating flooring does not occur does not hold. sent17: if the favorableness occurs the gating two-piece occurs. sent18: the tapotement does not occur. sent19: that not the gating concubine but the cartwheel occurs is incorrect. sent20: the fact that the favorableness and the naprapathy occurs is incorrect. sent21: the priming resuscitation happens if the fact that the rainstorm does not occur and the ministering does not occur is incorrect. sent22: the gating two-piece occurs if the fact that the fact that both the non-favorableness and the naprapathy happens is right does not hold. sent23: if the priming aldehyde does not occur not the ontogeneticness but the digressing happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the unfavorableness and the naprapathy happens.; assump1 -> int1: the naprapathy happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the naprapathy does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the favorableness does not occur but the naprapathy happens is incorrect.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the gating two-piece occurs.; sent21 & sent6 -> int5: the priming resuscitation occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the priming resuscitation occurs and the gating two-piece happens.; [assump2] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__