the Zephyr is not unrespectable.
sent1: the split is not a stele if there is something such that it is not lobeliaceous and it does designate. sent2: the fact that the twerp is a kind of a forty that is a stele does not hold. sent3: if the split is not a stele that the twerp is not a kind of a forty but it is a stele is wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a stele and it is a Northeast then the twerp is not a dimmer. sent5: a non-unrespectable thing is not a kind of a Northeast and is not a dimmer. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a Northeast is not a kind of a dimmer then that it is not ascosporic is not wrong. sent7: the twerp does accord. sent8: that if something is a stele it is unrespectable is not wrong. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a cathode. sent10: the split is not a stele if something is lobeliaceous and does not designate. sent11: the Zephyr is respectable if the twerp is both not a dimmer and not a Northeast. sent12: the Job is not unrespectable. sent13: if something accords then that it is non-ascosporic a dimmer is wrong. sent14: if the split is not a kind of a stele the fact that the twerp is a forty and a stele does not hold. sent15: something is not ascosporic if it is a forty. sent16: the disk is not a cathode. sent17: there is something such that it is a cathode and does dilapidate Erebus. sent18: if the twerp is a kind of a forty then it is not ascosporic. sent19: something is not lobeliaceous and it does not designate. sent20: the twerp is not a kind of a Northeast if there exists something such that it is not a cathode and dilapidates Erebus. sent21: if that something is not a forty and is a stele does not hold it is not ascosporic. sent22: the split is not a stele if something that is not lobeliaceous does not designate. sent23: there is something such that it dilapidates Erebus.
sent19 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the split is a stele is right is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the twerp is not a forty but it is a stele does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: if the fact that the twerp is not a forty but a stele is wrong then it is not ascosporic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the twerp is not ascosporic is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the twerp is a kind of a dimmer is right.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the twerp is not ascosporic but it is a dimmer.; sent13 -> int6: if the twerp does accord that it is a kind of non-ascosporic a dimmer is not correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the fact that the twerp is not ascosporic but it is a dimmer is false.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the twerp is not a kind of a dimmer.;
the Job is not an accord.
sent6 -> int10: the Job is not ascosporic if it is not a Northeast and it is not a kind of a dimmer.; sent5 -> int11: the Job is not a kind of a Northeast and it is not a dimmer if it is not unrespectable.; int11 & sent12 -> int12: the Job is not a kind of a Northeast and is not a dimmer.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the Job is not ascosporic.;
$hypothesis$ = the Zephyr is not unrespectable. ; $context$ = sent1: the split is not a stele if there is something such that it is not lobeliaceous and it does designate. sent2: the fact that the twerp is a kind of a forty that is a stele does not hold. sent3: if the split is not a stele that the twerp is not a kind of a forty but it is a stele is wrong. sent4: if there exists something such that it is not a stele and it is a Northeast then the twerp is not a dimmer. sent5: a non-unrespectable thing is not a kind of a Northeast and is not a dimmer. sent6: if something that is not a kind of a Northeast is not a kind of a dimmer then that it is not ascosporic is not wrong. sent7: the twerp does accord. sent8: that if something is a stele it is unrespectable is not wrong. sent9: there exists something such that it is not a cathode. sent10: the split is not a stele if something is lobeliaceous and does not designate. sent11: the Zephyr is respectable if the twerp is both not a dimmer and not a Northeast. sent12: the Job is not unrespectable. sent13: if something accords then that it is non-ascosporic a dimmer is wrong. sent14: if the split is not a kind of a stele the fact that the twerp is a forty and a stele does not hold. sent15: something is not ascosporic if it is a forty. sent16: the disk is not a cathode. sent17: there is something such that it is a cathode and does dilapidate Erebus. sent18: if the twerp is a kind of a forty then it is not ascosporic. sent19: something is not lobeliaceous and it does not designate. sent20: the twerp is not a kind of a Northeast if there exists something such that it is not a cathode and dilapidates Erebus. sent21: if that something is not a forty and is a stele does not hold it is not ascosporic. sent22: the split is not a stele if something that is not lobeliaceous does not designate. sent23: there is something such that it dilapidates Erebus. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the split is a stele is right is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the fact that the twerp is not a forty but it is a stele does not hold.; sent21 -> int3: if the fact that the twerp is not a forty but a stele is wrong then it is not ascosporic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the twerp is not ascosporic is not incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the twerp is a kind of a dimmer is right.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the twerp is not ascosporic but it is a dimmer.; sent13 -> int6: if the twerp does accord that it is a kind of non-ascosporic a dimmer is not correct.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the fact that the twerp is not ascosporic but it is a dimmer is false.; int5 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the twerp is not a kind of a dimmer.; __UNKNOWN__