the fact that there is something such that if it does hydrate then the fact that it either is not a kind of a jailer or is not non-Burmese or both is not wrong is not correct.
sent1: something does not indurate knobble if it does indurate raree-show. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not philosophic then the expectoration is not chondritic and/or it is a Chilomastix. sent3: the paddle does not tout Labridae if the wad does not tout Labridae. sent4: the knobble does not upgrade. sent5: that the wad is not a sequence but it does tout Labridae does not hold if there is something such that it does not indurate knobble. sent6: the gherkin does indurate raree-show. sent7: the Vinylite is a hydrate if the paddle does not tout Labridae. sent8: the beachball is a kind of a hydrate if the fact that it is not a kind of a jailer or is a Burmese or both is false. sent9: the beachball is not a Burmese. sent10: if the knobble is Orthodox the fact that the Vinylite touts assisted is true. sent11: if something that does hydrate does tout assisted the rotary is not philosophic. sent12: if something is not a kind of an upgrade then it is Orthodox. sent13: if that either something is not a jailer or it is Burmese or both is not correct it is not a hydrate. sent14: if the fact that something does not sequence but it does tout Labridae is not true then it does not tout Labridae.
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the beachball is not a kind of a jailer or is a Burmese or both is incorrect then it is not a hydrate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the beachball is not a jailer and/or it is Burmese is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the beachball is not a hydrate.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the beachball hydrates.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the beachball is not a jailer and/or it is not non-Burmese.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the beachball is not a jailer and/or is a Burmese if it is a hydrate.; int5 -> hypothesis;
either the expectoration is not chondritic or it is a Chilomastix or both.
sent14 -> int6: if the fact that that the wad is not a sequence and touts Labridae is not wrong is not right that it does not touts Labridae hold.; sent1 -> int7: if the gherkin indurates raree-show it does not indurate knobble.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the gherkin does not indurate knobble.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that it does not indurate knobble.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the fact that the wad is not a kind of a sequence but it touts Labridae is not correct.; int6 & int10 -> int11: the wad does not tout Labridae.; sent3 & int11 -> int12: the paddle does not tout Labridae.; sent7 & int12 -> int13: the Vinylite is a kind of a hydrate.; sent12 -> int14: the knobble is Orthodox if it does not upgrade.; int14 & sent4 -> int15: the knobble is Orthodox.; sent10 & int15 -> int16: the Vinylite does tout assisted.; int13 & int16 -> int17: the Vinylite is a hydrate that does tout assisted.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is a kind of a hydrate and it touts assisted.; int18 & sent11 -> int19: the rotary is not philosophic.; int19 -> int20: that there exists something such that it is not philosophic is not false.; int20 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it does hydrate then the fact that it either is not a kind of a jailer or is not non-Burmese or both is not wrong is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not indurate knobble if it does indurate raree-show. sent2: if there exists something such that it is not philosophic then the expectoration is not chondritic and/or it is a Chilomastix. sent3: the paddle does not tout Labridae if the wad does not tout Labridae. sent4: the knobble does not upgrade. sent5: that the wad is not a sequence but it does tout Labridae does not hold if there is something such that it does not indurate knobble. sent6: the gherkin does indurate raree-show. sent7: the Vinylite is a hydrate if the paddle does not tout Labridae. sent8: the beachball is a kind of a hydrate if the fact that it is not a kind of a jailer or is a Burmese or both is false. sent9: the beachball is not a Burmese. sent10: if the knobble is Orthodox the fact that the Vinylite touts assisted is true. sent11: if something that does hydrate does tout assisted the rotary is not philosophic. sent12: if something is not a kind of an upgrade then it is Orthodox. sent13: if that either something is not a jailer or it is Burmese or both is not correct it is not a hydrate. sent14: if the fact that something does not sequence but it does tout Labridae is not true then it does not tout Labridae. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: if the fact that the beachball is not a kind of a jailer or is a Burmese or both is incorrect then it is not a hydrate.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the beachball is not a jailer and/or it is Burmese is false.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the beachball is not a hydrate.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the beachball hydrates.; int2 & assump2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the beachball is not a jailer and/or it is not non-Burmese.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the beachball is not a jailer and/or is a Burmese if it is a hydrate.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__