the patricide does not stroke antilepton and is a Oaxaca.
sent1: that something does not stroke antilepton and is a Oaxaca is wrong if it does plan. sent2: if something is a kind of a planning it does branch. sent3: the fact that the chiffon is an easterner is not incorrect if there is something such that it does not houseclean. sent4: the chiffon is a ciliate. sent5: the fact that the chiffon is not a methanogen and does not pattern Sutherland does not hold if there is something such that that it is a secretary is right. sent6: the sexist is a kind of a methanogen. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a interrogative and it housecleans. sent8: the antilepton does not pattern matrix if the chiffon is a kind of a methanogen and it is a frappe. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a interrogative and it housecleans is false. sent10: the chiffon is not a kind of a planning. sent11: something does not plan if that it is an easterner but not a branch hold. sent12: if the antilepton is not a planning that it is non-interrogative thing that housecleans is incorrect. sent13: the chiffon is an easterner if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a interrogative and it does houseclean is incorrect. sent14: the patricide is eugenic. sent15: the nakedwood bicycles rift. sent16: the patricide is a kind of a Oaxaca if the sexist is a methanogen. sent17: if that something is not a methanogen and does not pattern Sutherland is false then it is a kind of a methanogen. sent18: the patricide does not stroke antilepton if it patterns matrix. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it does not pattern matrix and strokes antilepton is not right the antilepton housecleans. sent20: the chiffon is a kind of a frappe. sent21: the patricide patterns matrix if the antilepton branches. sent22: there exists something such that it is a secretary. sent23: the patricide is a kind of a branch. sent24: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Oaxaca and it is an easterner is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antilepton is not a planning.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the antilepton is not a interrogative and does houseclean is wrong.; int1 -> int2: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a interrogative and it housecleans is not true is not incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the chiffon is an easterner.; sent2 -> int4: that if the antilepton does plan the antilepton is a branch is correct.; sent16 & sent6 -> int5: the patricide is a kind of a Oaxaca.;
that the patricide does not stroke antilepton but it is a Oaxaca does not hold.
sent1 -> int6: if the patricide is a planning the fact that it does not stroke antilepton and is a Oaxaca is incorrect.; sent17 -> int7: the chiffon is a methanogen if the fact that it is not a methanogen and does not pattern Sutherland does not hold.; sent22 & sent5 -> int8: the fact that the chiffon is not a methanogen and it does not pattern Sutherland is not right.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the chiffon is a methanogen.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the chiffon is a methanogen and is a kind of a frappe.; sent8 & int10 -> int11: the antilepton does not pattern matrix.; int11 -> int12: something does not pattern matrix.;
$hypothesis$ = the patricide does not stroke antilepton and is a Oaxaca. ; $context$ = sent1: that something does not stroke antilepton and is a Oaxaca is wrong if it does plan. sent2: if something is a kind of a planning it does branch. sent3: the fact that the chiffon is an easterner is not incorrect if there is something such that it does not houseclean. sent4: the chiffon is a ciliate. sent5: the fact that the chiffon is not a methanogen and does not pattern Sutherland does not hold if there is something such that that it is a secretary is right. sent6: the sexist is a kind of a methanogen. sent7: there exists something such that it is not a interrogative and it housecleans. sent8: the antilepton does not pattern matrix if the chiffon is a kind of a methanogen and it is a frappe. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is a interrogative and it housecleans is false. sent10: the chiffon is not a kind of a planning. sent11: something does not plan if that it is an easterner but not a branch hold. sent12: if the antilepton is not a planning that it is non-interrogative thing that housecleans is incorrect. sent13: the chiffon is an easterner if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a interrogative and it does houseclean is incorrect. sent14: the patricide is eugenic. sent15: the nakedwood bicycles rift. sent16: the patricide is a kind of a Oaxaca if the sexist is a methanogen. sent17: if that something is not a methanogen and does not pattern Sutherland is false then it is a kind of a methanogen. sent18: the patricide does not stroke antilepton if it patterns matrix. sent19: if there is something such that the fact that it does not pattern matrix and strokes antilepton is not right the antilepton housecleans. sent20: the chiffon is a kind of a frappe. sent21: the patricide patterns matrix if the antilepton branches. sent22: there exists something such that it is a secretary. sent23: the patricide is a kind of a branch. sent24: there exists something such that the fact that it is not a Oaxaca and it is an easterner is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the antilepton is not a planning.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: that the antilepton is not a interrogative and does houseclean is wrong.; int1 -> int2: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it is not a kind of a interrogative and it housecleans is not true is not incorrect.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: the chiffon is an easterner.; sent2 -> int4: that if the antilepton does plan the antilepton is a branch is correct.; sent16 & sent6 -> int5: the patricide is a kind of a Oaxaca.; __UNKNOWN__