the fact that that the incompressibleness does not occur and the refreshing wolverine does not occur is caused by that the hemorrhoidectomy happens is not right.
sent1: the refreshing wolverine does not occur if the fact that the non-mousyness and/or the refreshing great-uncle occurs is not right. sent2: either the non-mousiness or that the refreshing great-uncle occurs or both prevents that the hemorrhoidectomy occurs. sent3: if the jerk happens then the incompressibleness does not occur and the cross-pollination does not occur. sent4: both the jerk and the crediting happens. sent5: the credit occurs. sent6: the hemorrhoidectomy does not occur if the mousiness does not occur. sent7: both the impreciseness and the combinativeness happens if the fact that the diagonalizableness occurs is right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the non-mousiness or the refreshing great-uncle or both happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the hemorrhoidectomy does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hemorrhoidectomy occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that either the non-mousiness or the refreshing great-uncle or both occurs is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the refreshing wolverine does not occur.; sent4 -> int5: that the fact that the jerking does not occur is not false is false.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the incompressibleness does not occur and the cross-pollination does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the incompressibleness does not occur.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the incompressibleness does not occur and the refreshing wolverine does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the incompressibleness does not occur and the refreshing wolverine does not occur is caused by that the hemorrhoidectomy happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the refreshing wolverine does not occur if the fact that the non-mousyness and/or the refreshing great-uncle occurs is not right. sent2: either the non-mousiness or that the refreshing great-uncle occurs or both prevents that the hemorrhoidectomy occurs. sent3: if the jerk happens then the incompressibleness does not occur and the cross-pollination does not occur. sent4: both the jerk and the crediting happens. sent5: the credit occurs. sent6: the hemorrhoidectomy does not occur if the mousiness does not occur. sent7: both the impreciseness and the combinativeness happens if the fact that the diagonalizableness occurs is right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the non-mousiness or the refreshing great-uncle or both happens.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the hemorrhoidectomy does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the hemorrhoidectomy occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that either the non-mousiness or the refreshing great-uncle or both occurs is not right.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the refreshing wolverine does not occur.; sent4 -> int5: that the fact that the jerking does not occur is not false is false.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the incompressibleness does not occur and the cross-pollination does not occur.; int6 -> int7: the incompressibleness does not occur.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the incompressibleness does not occur and the refreshing wolverine does not occur.; [assump2] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__