the fact that the Seder is a rogation and it churns localism is incorrect.
sent1: something is irrevocable and is not a rogation if it is not antipollution. sent2: that the empress does not exsiccate injector hold. sent3: if that something does exsiccate ladder and/or is not a aerogram is false then it is not incompressible. sent4: if the Seder either does exsiccate ladder or is not a kind of a aerogram or both it does churn localism. sent5: if that the Seder is not incompressible is not wrong it does not exsiccate injector. sent6: something does exsiccate injector if it is incompressible. sent7: if the sphenoid is cardiovascular then the injector is incompressible. sent8: the fact that the empress is cardiovascular but it is not a kind of a rogation is incorrect. sent9: the Seder is a rogation. sent10: if that something does exsiccate injector and does churn localism is false it does not churn localism. sent11: if the Seder does not exsiccate injector then the fact that the empress is cardiovascular but it does not exsiccate injector does not hold. sent12: that if the retardant churns localism then the sphenoid is cardiovascular is true. sent13: the empress is cardiovascular thing that does not exsiccate injector. sent14: something churns localism if it is irrevocable and it is not a rogation.
sent3 -> int1: the Seder is not incompressible if the fact that it exsiccates ladder and/or is not a kind of a aerogram is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Seder either does exsiccate ladder or is not a aerogram or both is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Seder is not incompressible.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Seder does not exsiccate injector.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the empress is cardiovascular thing that does not exsiccate injector is wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the Seder does exsiccate ladder or it is not a kind of a aerogram or both is true.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Seder does churn localism.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the empress does exsiccate ladder but it is not a skyrocket.
sent6 -> int8: if the injector is incompressible then it does exsiccate injector.; sent14 -> int9: if the retardant is irrevocable but it is not a rogation it churns localism.; sent1 -> int10: the retardant is irrevocable and is not a rogation if it is not antipollution.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Seder is a rogation and it churns localism is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is irrevocable and is not a rogation if it is not antipollution. sent2: that the empress does not exsiccate injector hold. sent3: if that something does exsiccate ladder and/or is not a aerogram is false then it is not incompressible. sent4: if the Seder either does exsiccate ladder or is not a kind of a aerogram or both it does churn localism. sent5: if that the Seder is not incompressible is not wrong it does not exsiccate injector. sent6: something does exsiccate injector if it is incompressible. sent7: if the sphenoid is cardiovascular then the injector is incompressible. sent8: the fact that the empress is cardiovascular but it is not a kind of a rogation is incorrect. sent9: the Seder is a rogation. sent10: if that something does exsiccate injector and does churn localism is false it does not churn localism. sent11: if the Seder does not exsiccate injector then the fact that the empress is cardiovascular but it does not exsiccate injector does not hold. sent12: that if the retardant churns localism then the sphenoid is cardiovascular is true. sent13: the empress is cardiovascular thing that does not exsiccate injector. sent14: something churns localism if it is irrevocable and it is not a rogation. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the Seder is not incompressible if the fact that it exsiccates ladder and/or is not a kind of a aerogram is not true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Seder either does exsiccate ladder or is not a aerogram or both is not true.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Seder is not incompressible.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the Seder does not exsiccate injector.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the fact that the empress is cardiovascular thing that does not exsiccate injector is wrong.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the Seder does exsiccate ladder or it is not a kind of a aerogram or both is true.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the Seder does churn localism.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__