the ungregariousness and the exegeticness happens.
sent1: if the afforesting hausmannite does not occur then the googly happens. sent2: that the mollification happens but the ungregariousness does not occur is triggered by that the profession happens. sent3: the requiescat does not occur. sent4: if the requiescat does not occur then the tossing occurs. sent5: both the exegeticness and the fishing happens. sent6: the attitude happens and the leaning conima happens. sent7: if the ophiolatry occurs the follicularness happens. sent8: if the tossing happens then the mollification happens. sent9: if both the mollification and the non-ungregariousness occurs the mixture happens. sent10: the fishing occurs.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the toss occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the mollification occurs.; sent5 -> int3: the exegeticness happens.;
that both the ungregariousness and the exegeticness occurs is false.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the ungregariousness and the exegeticness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the afforesting hausmannite does not occur then the googly happens. sent2: that the mollification happens but the ungregariousness does not occur is triggered by that the profession happens. sent3: the requiescat does not occur. sent4: if the requiescat does not occur then the tossing occurs. sent5: both the exegeticness and the fishing happens. sent6: the attitude happens and the leaning conima happens. sent7: if the ophiolatry occurs the follicularness happens. sent8: if the tossing happens then the mollification happens. sent9: if both the mollification and the non-ungregariousness occurs the mixture happens. sent10: the fishing occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the toss occurs.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the mollification occurs.; sent5 -> int3: the exegeticness happens.; __UNKNOWN__