the opposition does not occur but the disfigurement happens.
sent1: that the bed-hopping does not occur and the catering occurs is caused by the audibleness. sent2: the inaudibleness occurs. sent3: the transubstantiation does not occur but the parallax happens. sent4: if the channels does not occur the fact that the pureness occurs but the immunity does not occur is not right. sent5: the jolt does not occur. sent6: the disfigurement occurs. sent7: the channels does not occur if both the catering and the inaudibleness occurs. sent8: the outflanking Shiism happens. sent9: the outflanking Shiism is prevented by that the immunity occurs. sent10: if the fact that the pureness but not the immunity happens is not correct then the outflanking Shiism does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the catering happens.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: both the catering and the inaudibleness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the channeling does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the pureness happens and the immunity does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the outflanking Shiism does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the catering does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the catering does not occur and the jolting does not occur.;
that the opposition does not occur but the disfigurement occurs does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the opposition does not occur but the disfigurement happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the bed-hopping does not occur and the catering occurs is caused by the audibleness. sent2: the inaudibleness occurs. sent3: the transubstantiation does not occur but the parallax happens. sent4: if the channels does not occur the fact that the pureness occurs but the immunity does not occur is not right. sent5: the jolt does not occur. sent6: the disfigurement occurs. sent7: the channels does not occur if both the catering and the inaudibleness occurs. sent8: the outflanking Shiism happens. sent9: the outflanking Shiism is prevented by that the immunity occurs. sent10: if the fact that the pureness but not the immunity happens is not correct then the outflanking Shiism does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the catering happens.; assump1 & sent2 -> int1: both the catering and the inaudibleness occurs.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the channeling does not occur.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the pureness happens and the immunity does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the outflanking Shiism does not occur.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the catering does not occur.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the catering does not occur and the jolting does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__