there exists something such that if it is altricial it does not guarantee alliteration.
sent1: if something is altricial and it does guarantee alliteration then it is not a decoration. sent2: something is a kind of a prescription if it is not domiciliary or is a Arctonyx or both. sent3: if the newsreader is altricial then it is not an appointee and/or is a breaker. sent4: if the blues is a pentail then it is not a breaker. sent5: if something does not guarantee decoy it is altricial and it guarantees alliteration.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the newsreader is altricial.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the newsreader is not an appointee and/or is a breaker.;
either the langouste is not a decoration or it is a kind of a breaker or both.
sent1 -> int2: if the newsreader is altricial and does guarantee alliteration it is not a kind of a decoration.; sent5 -> int3: the newsreader is a kind of altricial thing that guarantees alliteration if it does not guarantee decoy.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is altricial it does not guarantee alliteration. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is altricial and it does guarantee alliteration then it is not a decoration. sent2: something is a kind of a prescription if it is not domiciliary or is a Arctonyx or both. sent3: if the newsreader is altricial then it is not an appointee and/or is a breaker. sent4: if the blues is a pentail then it is not a breaker. sent5: if something does not guarantee decoy it is altricial and it guarantees alliteration. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the newsreader is altricial.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the newsreader is not an appointee and/or is a breaker.; __UNKNOWN__