the fact that that the iconography is not a wheel and it is not a Chilomastix is not wrong is false.
sent1: if something is not indecent it does not emulsify kalemia and is not a kind of an award. sent2: something is not a kind of a Chilomastix if it is not sublittoral. sent3: if the fact that that the gigolo is a kind of a clocksmith and does emulsify interferometer is wrong is not incorrect then the iconography does not emulsify interferometer. sent4: the iconography does not emulsify address and does not observe. sent5: something does not adjoin impeccability and is not a kind of a deregulation if it does not emulsify interferometer. sent6: the iconography is not sublittoral if it is not unchangeable and it is non-executive. sent7: the iconography is not a kind of a clocksmith and/or it is arundinaceous if the tam is a clocksmith. sent8: the tam is a deregulation and/or sublittoral if the iconography is a deregulation. sent9: the fact that something is a clocksmith and it does emulsify interferometer does not hold if it is not arundinaceous. sent10: if something does not adjoin impeccability and it is not a deregulation it is a kind of a clocksmith. sent11: the iconography is not unchangeable and it is not an executive. sent12: the tam is sublittoral. sent13: if the deep-freeze is sublittoral the trotter is sublittoral. sent14: the fact that everything does not emulsify interferometer hold. sent15: if the iconography is not unchangeable and/or it is a wheel the fact that it does not emulsify interferometer hold. sent16: the deep-freeze is not a tantalum and does not emulsify vestmented. sent17: a unchristian and non-midi thing is not Jain. sent18: the deep-freeze is sublittoral if it is not anthropometric. sent19: the tam is not a kind of a wheel if it is not a deregulation. sent20: if the deep-freeze is not a tantalum and does not emulsify vestmented it is not anthropometric. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a foible and is not a kind of an executive is incorrect then the trotter is unchangeable. sent22: the fact that the spectrometer is not sepaloid hold if it does not adjoin impeccability and is not a zidovudine. sent23: if the iconography is not a deregulation but a Chilomastix then it does not emulsify interferometer. sent24: if the iconography is not a kind of a clocksmith or it is arundinaceous or both it does not wheel. sent25: if something does not emulsify interferometer then it does not adjoin impeccability. sent26: that the claimant is not a foible and it is not an executive is not true. sent27: the Shavian is arundinaceous. sent28: the aristocrat is not a deregulation.
sent5 -> int1: if the tam does not emulsify interferometer then it does not adjoin impeccability and it is not a deregulation.; sent14 -> int2: the tam does not emulsify interferometer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tam does not adjoin impeccability and is not a deregulation.; sent10 -> int4: if the tam does not adjoin impeccability and it is not a deregulation then it is a clocksmith.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tam is a clocksmith.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the iconography is not a clocksmith and/or it is arundinaceous is not wrong.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: that the iconography is not a wheel hold.; sent2 -> int8: the iconography is not a kind of a Chilomastix if it is not sublittoral.; sent6 & sent11 -> int9: the iconography is not sublittoral.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the iconography is not a kind of a Chilomastix.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
that the iconography is not a kind of a wheel and it is not a Chilomastix is not true.
sent9 -> int11: that the gigolo is a clocksmith and emulsifies interferometer does not hold if it is not arundinaceous.; sent20 & sent16 -> int12: the deep-freeze is not anthropometric.; sent18 & int12 -> int13: the deep-freeze is sublittoral.; sent13 & int13 -> int14: the trotter is sublittoral.; sent26 -> int15: there is something such that that it is not a foible and it is not executive is not right.; int15 & sent21 -> int16: the trotter is unchangeable.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the trotter is sublittoral and it is unchangeable.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it is sublittoral and is unchangeable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the iconography is not a wheel and it is not a Chilomastix is not wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not indecent it does not emulsify kalemia and is not a kind of an award. sent2: something is not a kind of a Chilomastix if it is not sublittoral. sent3: if the fact that that the gigolo is a kind of a clocksmith and does emulsify interferometer is wrong is not incorrect then the iconography does not emulsify interferometer. sent4: the iconography does not emulsify address and does not observe. sent5: something does not adjoin impeccability and is not a kind of a deregulation if it does not emulsify interferometer. sent6: the iconography is not sublittoral if it is not unchangeable and it is non-executive. sent7: the iconography is not a kind of a clocksmith and/or it is arundinaceous if the tam is a clocksmith. sent8: the tam is a deregulation and/or sublittoral if the iconography is a deregulation. sent9: the fact that something is a clocksmith and it does emulsify interferometer does not hold if it is not arundinaceous. sent10: if something does not adjoin impeccability and it is not a deregulation it is a kind of a clocksmith. sent11: the iconography is not unchangeable and it is not an executive. sent12: the tam is sublittoral. sent13: if the deep-freeze is sublittoral the trotter is sublittoral. sent14: the fact that everything does not emulsify interferometer hold. sent15: if the iconography is not unchangeable and/or it is a wheel the fact that it does not emulsify interferometer hold. sent16: the deep-freeze is not a tantalum and does not emulsify vestmented. sent17: a unchristian and non-midi thing is not Jain. sent18: the deep-freeze is sublittoral if it is not anthropometric. sent19: the tam is not a kind of a wheel if it is not a deregulation. sent20: if the deep-freeze is not a tantalum and does not emulsify vestmented it is not anthropometric. sent21: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a foible and is not a kind of an executive is incorrect then the trotter is unchangeable. sent22: the fact that the spectrometer is not sepaloid hold if it does not adjoin impeccability and is not a zidovudine. sent23: if the iconography is not a deregulation but a Chilomastix then it does not emulsify interferometer. sent24: if the iconography is not a kind of a clocksmith or it is arundinaceous or both it does not wheel. sent25: if something does not emulsify interferometer then it does not adjoin impeccability. sent26: that the claimant is not a foible and it is not an executive is not true. sent27: the Shavian is arundinaceous. sent28: the aristocrat is not a deregulation. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: if the tam does not emulsify interferometer then it does not adjoin impeccability and it is not a deregulation.; sent14 -> int2: the tam does not emulsify interferometer.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the tam does not adjoin impeccability and is not a deregulation.; sent10 -> int4: if the tam does not adjoin impeccability and it is not a deregulation then it is a clocksmith.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the tam is a clocksmith.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the iconography is not a clocksmith and/or it is arundinaceous is not wrong.; int6 & sent24 -> int7: that the iconography is not a wheel hold.; sent2 -> int8: the iconography is not a kind of a Chilomastix if it is not sublittoral.; sent6 & sent11 -> int9: the iconography is not sublittoral.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the iconography is not a kind of a Chilomastix.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__