that there exists something such that if it is not a soapiness then that the fact that either it does dab Houyhnhnms or it compromises haycock or both is not incorrect is false is not true.
sent1: if the spade does not violate then it is not a yips. sent2: if the congener is not a Gymnosporangium then it is not a kind of a soapiness. sent3: there is something such that if it does not scissor Cochlearius then the fact that it does not compromise elegance hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a luxury that it is a reptile and/or consummates is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a Tungusic then that it is not non-flimsy or Epicurean or both is wrong. sent6: the damourite is a soapiness and/or it is a Lithuanian if it does not spend. sent7: if the congener is not a soapiness the fact that it dabs Houyhnhnms and/or compromises haycock is not correct.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is not a soapiness then that the fact that either it does dab Houyhnhnms or it compromises haycock or both is not incorrect is false is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the spade does not violate then it is not a yips. sent2: if the congener is not a Gymnosporangium then it is not a kind of a soapiness. sent3: there is something such that if it does not scissor Cochlearius then the fact that it does not compromise elegance hold. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a luxury that it is a reptile and/or consummates is incorrect. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a Tungusic then that it is not non-flimsy or Epicurean or both is wrong. sent6: the damourite is a soapiness and/or it is a Lithuanian if it does not spend. sent7: if the congener is not a soapiness the fact that it dabs Houyhnhnms and/or compromises haycock is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__