the fact that the fact that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a systematism is not false it is ametabolic is right is false.
sent1: the fact that a non-labial thing is a systematism that is incontestable is not false. sent2: that if there is something such that it is a kind of a systematism the miniaturist is a mecca is right. sent3: the mealworm is not a kind of a systematism if the fact that that it is not a bitumen and does not blacklist Olivier is right does not hold. sent4: that that the mealworm is a kind of a bitumen but it does not blacklist Olivier hold is wrong. sent5: if something is not ametabolic the fact that it is a bitumen and it does not blacklist Olivier is not true. sent6: the fact that something is not a bitumen and it does not blacklist Olivier does not hold if it is not ametabolic. sent7: the fact that the alpha-adrenoceptor does not make and is not a bitumen is false. sent8: there is something such that if it does stave Katsuwonus it is divergent. sent9: that the fact that the mealworm does not make and is not a bitumen is not incorrect is not right.
sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the mealworm is not ametabolic is not wrong then that it is not a bitumen and does not blacklist Olivier is wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mealworm is not ametabolic.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the mealworm is not a bitumen and it does not blacklist Olivier is false.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the mealworm is not a systematism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mealworm is a systematism.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the mealworm is ametabolic.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the mealworm is a systematism it is ametabolic.; int6 -> hypothesis;
that the mealworm is both not a mecca and not ametabolic is not true.
sent1 -> int7: if the compartment is not a labial it is a systematism and incontestable.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that there is something such that if that it is a kind of a systematism is not false it is ametabolic is right is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that a non-labial thing is a systematism that is incontestable is not false. sent2: that if there is something such that it is a kind of a systematism the miniaturist is a mecca is right. sent3: the mealworm is not a kind of a systematism if the fact that that it is not a bitumen and does not blacklist Olivier is right does not hold. sent4: that that the mealworm is a kind of a bitumen but it does not blacklist Olivier hold is wrong. sent5: if something is not ametabolic the fact that it is a bitumen and it does not blacklist Olivier is not true. sent6: the fact that something is not a bitumen and it does not blacklist Olivier does not hold if it is not ametabolic. sent7: the fact that the alpha-adrenoceptor does not make and is not a bitumen is false. sent8: there is something such that if it does stave Katsuwonus it is divergent. sent9: that the fact that the mealworm does not make and is not a bitumen is not incorrect is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: if the fact that the mealworm is not ametabolic is not wrong then that it is not a bitumen and does not blacklist Olivier is wrong.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the mealworm is not ametabolic.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the fact that the mealworm is not a bitumen and it does not blacklist Olivier is false.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the mealworm is not a systematism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mealworm is a systematism.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the mealworm is ametabolic.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: if the mealworm is a systematism it is ametabolic.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__