the fact that if the captain groups Hemiprocnidae the poppet is a diseased is not true.
sent1: the fact that the calomel is a Tarsius is not incorrect if something is syntagmatic and does not group Maupassant. sent2: something is a kind of a diseased that does not group capstan if the fact that it overturns responsibility is right. sent3: the poppet is not bronchoscopic and it is not a thirtieth. sent4: something is not a Araneae if that it is not a kind of a Lordship and is a kind of a Araneae is not correct. sent5: the captain does not group Hemiprocnidae if it is a fascist and/or it does not group strangulation. sent6: if the fact that the signora does not overturn overload but it overturns responsibility is false the captain overturns responsibility. sent7: that if the poppet is not bronchoscopic and it is not the thirtieth then the poppet overturns coralwood is true. sent8: if something is a Tarsius the fact that it is not a Lordship and it is a Araneae is not correct. sent9: if something is symphonic then it does group capstan. sent10: if the captain does not group strangulation then it does not group Hemiprocnidae. sent11: that the signora does not overturn overload but it overturns responsibility is not correct if something is not a Araneae. sent12: the fact that either the captain is a kind of a fascist or it groups strangulation or both hold. sent13: that the poppet is a holocephalan is wrong. sent14: if that the captain does not group capstan is not false then the fact that the person does not group Hemiprocnidae and/or is neuropsychiatric is not correct. sent15: if the saddler is not a yarder then it is syntagmatic thing that does not group Maupassant. sent16: if something that is not a holocephalan overturns coralwood the saddler is not a kind of a yarder. sent17: if the fact that something does not group Hemiprocnidae or is neuropsychiatric or both is incorrect then it is not symphonic. sent18: if the fact that the calomel is not neuropsychiatric is true then the saddler does not group capstan. sent19: the poppet is a diseased if the saddler does not group capstan. sent20: the captain does group strangulation. sent21: the calomel is not neuropsychiatric if the signora is symphonic. sent22: the saddler is a kind of a fascist. sent23: the signora is symphonic if that either the captain is fascist or it does group strangulation or both is not true. sent24: if either the captain is a fascist or it does not group strangulation or both then it does group Hemiprocnidae. sent25: the fact that the signora is symphonic is not incorrect if that the captain either is a fascist or does not group strangulation or both is not correct.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the captain does group Hemiprocnidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the captain is fascist and/or does not group strangulation.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the captain does not group Hemiprocnidae.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the captain is a kind of a fascist or does not group strangulation or both does not hold.; sent25 & int3 -> int4: the signora is symphonic.; sent21 & int4 -> int5: the calomel is not neuropsychiatric.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the saddler does not group capstan.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the poppet is a kind of a diseased.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the calomel groups capstan.
sent9 -> int8: if the calomel is symphonic it groups capstan.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the captain groups Hemiprocnidae the poppet is a diseased is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the calomel is a Tarsius is not incorrect if something is syntagmatic and does not group Maupassant. sent2: something is a kind of a diseased that does not group capstan if the fact that it overturns responsibility is right. sent3: the poppet is not bronchoscopic and it is not a thirtieth. sent4: something is not a Araneae if that it is not a kind of a Lordship and is a kind of a Araneae is not correct. sent5: the captain does not group Hemiprocnidae if it is a fascist and/or it does not group strangulation. sent6: if the fact that the signora does not overturn overload but it overturns responsibility is false the captain overturns responsibility. sent7: that if the poppet is not bronchoscopic and it is not the thirtieth then the poppet overturns coralwood is true. sent8: if something is a Tarsius the fact that it is not a Lordship and it is a Araneae is not correct. sent9: if something is symphonic then it does group capstan. sent10: if the captain does not group strangulation then it does not group Hemiprocnidae. sent11: that the signora does not overturn overload but it overturns responsibility is not correct if something is not a Araneae. sent12: the fact that either the captain is a kind of a fascist or it groups strangulation or both hold. sent13: that the poppet is a holocephalan is wrong. sent14: if that the captain does not group capstan is not false then the fact that the person does not group Hemiprocnidae and/or is neuropsychiatric is not correct. sent15: if the saddler is not a yarder then it is syntagmatic thing that does not group Maupassant. sent16: if something that is not a holocephalan overturns coralwood the saddler is not a kind of a yarder. sent17: if the fact that something does not group Hemiprocnidae or is neuropsychiatric or both is incorrect then it is not symphonic. sent18: if the fact that the calomel is not neuropsychiatric is true then the saddler does not group capstan. sent19: the poppet is a diseased if the saddler does not group capstan. sent20: the captain does group strangulation. sent21: the calomel is not neuropsychiatric if the signora is symphonic. sent22: the saddler is a kind of a fascist. sent23: the signora is symphonic if that either the captain is fascist or it does group strangulation or both is not true. sent24: if either the captain is a fascist or it does not group strangulation or both then it does group Hemiprocnidae. sent25: the fact that the signora is symphonic is not incorrect if that the captain either is a fascist or does not group strangulation or both is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the captain does group Hemiprocnidae.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the captain is fascist and/or does not group strangulation.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the captain does not group Hemiprocnidae.; assump2 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the captain is a kind of a fascist or does not group strangulation or both does not hold.; sent25 & int3 -> int4: the signora is symphonic.; sent21 & int4 -> int5: the calomel is not neuropsychiatric.; sent18 & int5 -> int6: the saddler does not group capstan.; sent19 & int6 -> int7: the poppet is a kind of a diseased.; [assump2] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__