the fact that there is something such that if it is an inventor then it is a reticulation and is not a Choloepus is wrong.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a quick is not incorrect it is prudent and it is not a motile. sent2: something is both a reticulation and not a Choloepus if it is an inventor. sent3: there exists something such that if it is ostentatious it is a barrels and it strokes steeplejack. sent4: there is something such that if it is a diathermy then it does stroke backswimmer and it plays. sent5: if the marauder is archival then it is both an inventor and not nonsurgical. sent6: if the Bush is an inventor it patterns Bush and it does not single ampleness. sent7: there is something such that if it is chauvinistic then it is prudent. sent8: there is something such that if it patterns FORTRAN then it is canicular thing that is distributive. sent9: there exists something such that if it bicycles fireguard it is a Ephesian. sent10: if something is a endoparasite then it is a kind of heedful thing that is not an exorcist. sent11: there exists something such that if it is agrypnotic it is bibliographic. sent12: the fact that the marauder is not paintable is not wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a Choloepus is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a remittance it is not an emeritus.
sent2 -> int1: the marauder is a kind of a reticulation and is not a Choloepus if it is a kind of an inventor.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is an inventor then it is a reticulation and is not a Choloepus is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is a kind of a quick is not incorrect it is prudent and it is not a motile. sent2: something is both a reticulation and not a Choloepus if it is an inventor. sent3: there exists something such that if it is ostentatious it is a barrels and it strokes steeplejack. sent4: there is something such that if it is a diathermy then it does stroke backswimmer and it plays. sent5: if the marauder is archival then it is both an inventor and not nonsurgical. sent6: if the Bush is an inventor it patterns Bush and it does not single ampleness. sent7: there is something such that if it is chauvinistic then it is prudent. sent8: there is something such that if it patterns FORTRAN then it is canicular thing that is distributive. sent9: there exists something such that if it bicycles fireguard it is a Ephesian. sent10: if something is a endoparasite then it is a kind of heedful thing that is not an exorcist. sent11: there exists something such that if it is agrypnotic it is bibliographic. sent12: the fact that the marauder is not paintable is not wrong if the fact that it is not a kind of a Choloepus is wrong. sent13: there exists something such that if it is a remittance it is not an emeritus. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the marauder is a kind of a reticulation and is not a Choloepus if it is a kind of an inventor.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__