there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a sulky and it is imitative hold then it is not a smokescreen.
sent1: if the impersonator does not theorize and is a smokescreen then it is not antiphonary. sent2: if something is not a sulky and is imitative it is a kind of a smokescreen. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not truss kvass and is just then it does not truss trad. sent4: there is something such that if it is not academic and it is a crus then it is not a Neolithic. sent5: the impersonator is a smokescreen if it is not a sulky and it is imitative. sent6: if the impersonator is both a sulky and imitative then it is not a smokescreen. sent7: there is something such that if it is a sulky and it is imitative then it is not a kind of a smokescreen. sent8: if something is both a sulky and imitative it is not a kind of a smokescreen. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a sulky and is imitative then it is a smokescreen. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-backing a valine then it is not chylific.
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if that it is not a kind of a sulky and it is imitative hold then it is not a smokescreen. ; $context$ = sent1: if the impersonator does not theorize and is a smokescreen then it is not antiphonary. sent2: if something is not a sulky and is imitative it is a kind of a smokescreen. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not truss kvass and is just then it does not truss trad. sent4: there is something such that if it is not academic and it is a crus then it is not a Neolithic. sent5: the impersonator is a smokescreen if it is not a sulky and it is imitative. sent6: if the impersonator is both a sulky and imitative then it is not a smokescreen. sent7: there is something such that if it is a sulky and it is imitative then it is not a kind of a smokescreen. sent8: if something is both a sulky and imitative it is not a kind of a smokescreen. sent9: there is something such that if it is not a sulky and is imitative then it is a smokescreen. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-backing a valine then it is not chylific. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__