there is something such that it is a kind of a mottling and does preponderate.
sent1: if something is a tea-strainer and it is scarce it is not a misquotation. sent2: the kittiwake is a growling. sent3: if something is not a mottling and it does not elaborate particular it is not a growling. sent4: if the weka is not arenaceous then the kittiwake is not a kind of a tea-strainer but it is scarce. sent5: the kittiwake is not a misquotation if it is a tea-strainer and it is scarce. sent6: the kittiwake is a kind of a growling if it is not a misquotation. sent7: the fact that the pasture encloses Downing and does preponderate is not incorrect. sent8: if the kittiwake is not a kind of a misquotation it preponderates and is a kind of a growling. sent9: if that something preponderates and is a kind of a misquotation is not right it is non-arenaceous. sent10: the kittiwake is not a tea-strainer. sent11: the kittiwake mottles. sent12: something that is both not a tea-strainer and not non-scarce is not a misquotation. sent13: something preponderates. sent14: the fact that the kittiwake is not a tea-strainer if the weka is not arenaceous is true. sent15: the kittiwake is a sarcosporidian.
sent12 -> int1: the kittiwake is not a misquotation if it is not a tea-strainer and is scarce.;
the phaius is not arenaceous.
sent9 -> int2: the phaius is not arenaceous if that it preponderates and is a misquotation is not true.; sent3 -> int3: if the weka does not mottle and it does not elaborate particular then it is not a kind of a growling.; sent15 -> int4: there is something such that it is a sarcosporidian.;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that it is a kind of a mottling and does preponderate. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a tea-strainer and it is scarce it is not a misquotation. sent2: the kittiwake is a growling. sent3: if something is not a mottling and it does not elaborate particular it is not a growling. sent4: if the weka is not arenaceous then the kittiwake is not a kind of a tea-strainer but it is scarce. sent5: the kittiwake is not a misquotation if it is a tea-strainer and it is scarce. sent6: the kittiwake is a kind of a growling if it is not a misquotation. sent7: the fact that the pasture encloses Downing and does preponderate is not incorrect. sent8: if the kittiwake is not a kind of a misquotation it preponderates and is a kind of a growling. sent9: if that something preponderates and is a kind of a misquotation is not right it is non-arenaceous. sent10: the kittiwake is not a tea-strainer. sent11: the kittiwake mottles. sent12: something that is both not a tea-strainer and not non-scarce is not a misquotation. sent13: something preponderates. sent14: the fact that the kittiwake is not a tea-strainer if the weka is not arenaceous is true. sent15: the kittiwake is a sarcosporidian. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: the kittiwake is not a misquotation if it is not a tea-strainer and is scarce.; __UNKNOWN__