that the inmate does not loom Pyrethrum is correct.
sent1: the skewer does not moon if the inmate is metabolic and it is a kind of a placeholder. sent2: the lodestone does not cane Horne. sent3: The Horne does not cane inmate. sent4: something is a moon if it is a kind of a everlastingness and it does not loom Pyrethrum. sent5: something does not cane alterability if it is not a placeholder. sent6: the skewer does not cane Horne. sent7: the inmate is not a estazolam. sent8: if the fact that the stander does not cane alterability and it is not a moon does not hold it is not a placeholder. sent9: if something that does not elute charming is not a placeholder it is a moon. sent10: if something does elute charming then that it is metabolic is not false. sent11: if something is not a moon then the skewer is a placeholder. sent12: the inmate does not cane alterability. sent13: if the CPU does not loom spittoon then it is a kind of a everlastingness and it does not loom Pyrethrum. sent14: the CPU does not loom spittoon. sent15: if the inmate is glorious then it looms Pyrethrum. sent16: the inmate does not cane Horne. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a moon then that the stander does not cane alterability and is not a moon is not right. sent18: if something is not a kind of a placeholder then it does not cane alterability and it does not loom Pyrethrum. sent19: if the fact that the inmate is not a kind of a placeholder hold it does not cane alterability. sent20: there is something such that it is not a moon. sent21: the inmate is noncompetitive. sent22: if there is something such that it is metabolic the skewer either is a kind of a estazolam or is metabolic or both. sent23: the skewer is a kind of a everlastingness. sent24: if something is not a placeholder then it is metabolic and does elute charming. sent25: the skewer is not a everlastingness and does not elute charming if it is not metabolic. sent26: something that does not cane Horne and is not a estazolam does not elute charming.
sent26 -> int1: if the inmate does not cane Horne and it is not a kind of a estazolam it does elute charming.; sent16 & sent7 -> int2: the inmate does not cane Horne and is not a estazolam.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the inmate does elute charming.; sent10 -> int4: the inmate is metabolic if that it does not elute charming is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inmate is metabolic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inmate is a kind of a placeholder.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the inmate is metabolic a placeholder.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the skewer does not moon.; sent18 -> int8: the inmate does not cane alterability and does not loom Pyrethrum if the fact that it is not a placeholder is not wrong.;
that the inmate looms Pyrethrum is true.
sent20 & sent11 -> int9: the skewer is a placeholder.;
$hypothesis$ = that the inmate does not loom Pyrethrum is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the skewer does not moon if the inmate is metabolic and it is a kind of a placeholder. sent2: the lodestone does not cane Horne. sent3: The Horne does not cane inmate. sent4: something is a moon if it is a kind of a everlastingness and it does not loom Pyrethrum. sent5: something does not cane alterability if it is not a placeholder. sent6: the skewer does not cane Horne. sent7: the inmate is not a estazolam. sent8: if the fact that the stander does not cane alterability and it is not a moon does not hold it is not a placeholder. sent9: if something that does not elute charming is not a placeholder it is a moon. sent10: if something does elute charming then that it is metabolic is not false. sent11: if something is not a moon then the skewer is a placeholder. sent12: the inmate does not cane alterability. sent13: if the CPU does not loom spittoon then it is a kind of a everlastingness and it does not loom Pyrethrum. sent14: the CPU does not loom spittoon. sent15: if the inmate is glorious then it looms Pyrethrum. sent16: the inmate does not cane Horne. sent17: if there exists something such that it is a moon then that the stander does not cane alterability and is not a moon is not right. sent18: if something is not a kind of a placeholder then it does not cane alterability and it does not loom Pyrethrum. sent19: if the fact that the inmate is not a kind of a placeholder hold it does not cane alterability. sent20: there is something such that it is not a moon. sent21: the inmate is noncompetitive. sent22: if there is something such that it is metabolic the skewer either is a kind of a estazolam or is metabolic or both. sent23: the skewer is a kind of a everlastingness. sent24: if something is not a placeholder then it is metabolic and does elute charming. sent25: the skewer is not a everlastingness and does not elute charming if it is not metabolic. sent26: something that does not cane Horne and is not a estazolam does not elute charming. ; $proof$ = 
sent26 -> int1: if the inmate does not cane Horne and it is not a kind of a estazolam it does elute charming.; sent16 & sent7 -> int2: the inmate does not cane Horne and is not a estazolam.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the inmate does elute charming.; sent10 -> int4: the inmate is metabolic if that it does not elute charming is not correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the inmate is metabolic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the inmate is a kind of a placeholder.; int5 & assump1 -> int6: the inmate is metabolic a placeholder.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the skewer does not moon.; sent18 -> int8: the inmate does not cane alterability and does not loom Pyrethrum if the fact that it is not a placeholder is not wrong.; __UNKNOWN__