there exists something such that it is frequent and is a biodefense.
sent1: the dormitory is cadastral. sent2: the pastern is a kind of a circuitry. sent3: the sumac does rid stricken. sent4: if the fact that the dormitory is not cadastral but non-alopecic is not wrong then the sumac is not a kind of a Nilotic. sent5: the pastern frequents. sent6: if the pastern is not frequent then the delf is not frequent. sent7: the delf is not alopecic and it is not hypotonic if the fact that the sumac is not alopecic is not false. sent8: the mustache is not alopecic but it is cadastral. sent9: the fact that the delf is not alopecic is right if the sumac is not Nilotic and is hypotonic. sent10: the pastern is non-frequent thing that is not alopecic if the mustache is not frequent. sent11: that something is a kind of alopecic a biodefense does not hold if it is not a kind of a sapphirine. sent12: something is a kind of a waterbuck that does rid reassignment. sent13: the pika is cadastral. sent14: the pastern is a biodefense if something that is not a circuitry is cadastral. sent15: the delf is not antigenic and it is not zonal. sent16: there is something such that that it is alopecic is not incorrect. sent17: something is not a sapphirine but it is cadastral. sent18: the sumac is not a kind of a biodefense. sent19: that the cantaloup does book unselfishness and it frequents hold. sent20: if the mustache is not alopecic and not a sapphirine then the fact that the dormitory is not a circuitry is not false. sent21: the sumac is not a Nilotic and is hypotonic. sent22: there exists something such that it is alopecic and it is hypotonic. sent23: something is a sapphirine and it is a kind of a circuitry.
sent9 & sent21 -> int1: the delf is not alopecic.;
the reinforcement is cadastral.
sent11 -> int2: if the delf is not sapphirine then that it is alopecic thing that is a biodefense does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is frequent and is a biodefense. ; $context$ = sent1: the dormitory is cadastral. sent2: the pastern is a kind of a circuitry. sent3: the sumac does rid stricken. sent4: if the fact that the dormitory is not cadastral but non-alopecic is not wrong then the sumac is not a kind of a Nilotic. sent5: the pastern frequents. sent6: if the pastern is not frequent then the delf is not frequent. sent7: the delf is not alopecic and it is not hypotonic if the fact that the sumac is not alopecic is not false. sent8: the mustache is not alopecic but it is cadastral. sent9: the fact that the delf is not alopecic is right if the sumac is not Nilotic and is hypotonic. sent10: the pastern is non-frequent thing that is not alopecic if the mustache is not frequent. sent11: that something is a kind of alopecic a biodefense does not hold if it is not a kind of a sapphirine. sent12: something is a kind of a waterbuck that does rid reassignment. sent13: the pika is cadastral. sent14: the pastern is a biodefense if something that is not a circuitry is cadastral. sent15: the delf is not antigenic and it is not zonal. sent16: there is something such that that it is alopecic is not incorrect. sent17: something is not a sapphirine but it is cadastral. sent18: the sumac is not a kind of a biodefense. sent19: that the cantaloup does book unselfishness and it frequents hold. sent20: if the mustache is not alopecic and not a sapphirine then the fact that the dormitory is not a circuitry is not false. sent21: the sumac is not a Nilotic and is hypotonic. sent22: there exists something such that it is alopecic and it is hypotonic. sent23: something is a sapphirine and it is a kind of a circuitry. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent21 -> int1: the delf is not alopecic.; __UNKNOWN__