that the shamrock is a kind of a Mongol and savors is not right.
sent1: if something does not clinch hatmaker then it is a kind of a chemisorption. sent2: the finback does not clinch hatmaker if the fact that that the shamrock does savor but it is not a kind of a pyxie is not right hold. sent3: the fact that the finback undercuts hold. sent4: the shamrock is a brazier and clinches hatmaker. sent5: the orthoclase is not a bourbon if that it does clinch finback and it is a bourbon is wrong. sent6: the shamrock is a kind of a suppository if that the finback does striate or it is not a Strombidae or both does not hold. sent7: that the shamrock is a suppository and it is Mongol is not correct. sent8: the orthoclase does not clinch Eyeish if there exists something such that it ramps shamrock and it is not a pope. sent9: if that the finback undercuts hold the fact that it is a kind of a chemisorption and is not a suppository is incorrect. sent10: that something clinches finback and is a bourbon is not correct if it does not clinch Eyeish. sent11: the shamrock is a kind of a chemisorption that does not hatch fresco. sent12: the finback is allomerous but it does not nuzzle. sent13: if something clinches hatmaker and is a suppository then that it is not a kind of a chemisorption hold. sent14: if something is a MArch that it does striate and/or it is not a Strombidae does not hold. sent15: the fact that something is a kind of Mongol thing that savors does not hold if it is not a chemisorption. sent16: the neon does ramp shamrock but it is not a pope. sent17: if something does not clinch hatmaker it is a chemisorption and is not a suppository. sent18: the shamrock does striate. sent19: if there exists something such that it is not a bourbon then that the shamrock does not clinch hatmaker and is not an undercut is not correct. sent20: there exists something such that it is not a relaxation and does not clinch gladdon. sent21: if the shamrock is striate then it is Mongol.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the shamrock savors and is not a pyxie does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the finback does not clinch hatmaker.; sent17 -> int2: the finback is a chemisorption but it is not a suppository if that it does not clinch hatmaker is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the finback is a chemisorption and is not a suppository.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: that the finback is a kind of a chemisorption but it is not a suppository is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the shamrock does savor but it is not a pyxie.; int6 -> int7: the shamrock savors.; sent21 & sent18 -> int8: the shamrock is Mongol.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the shamrock is a Mongol and it savors is not correct.
sent15 -> int9: if the shamrock is not a chemisorption the fact that it is a Mongol and does savor is wrong.; sent13 -> int10: if the shamrock clinches hatmaker and it is a suppository it is not a chemisorption.; sent10 -> int11: if the orthoclase does not clinch Eyeish then the fact that it clinches finback and it is a bourbon is false.; sent16 -> int12: there is something such that that it ramps shamrock and is not a pope is not incorrect.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: the orthoclase does not clinch Eyeish.; int11 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the orthoclase clinches finback and it is a bourbon is not correct.; sent5 & int14 -> int15: the orthoclase is not a bourbon.; int15 -> int16: something is not a kind of a bourbon.; int16 & sent19 -> int17: that the shamrock does not clinch hatmaker and is not an undercut does not hold.; sent14 -> int18: the fact that the finback either does striate or is not a Strombidae or both is not right if it is a kind of a MArch.;
$hypothesis$ = that the shamrock is a kind of a Mongol and savors is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not clinch hatmaker then it is a kind of a chemisorption. sent2: the finback does not clinch hatmaker if the fact that that the shamrock does savor but it is not a kind of a pyxie is not right hold. sent3: the fact that the finback undercuts hold. sent4: the shamrock is a brazier and clinches hatmaker. sent5: the orthoclase is not a bourbon if that it does clinch finback and it is a bourbon is wrong. sent6: the shamrock is a kind of a suppository if that the finback does striate or it is not a Strombidae or both does not hold. sent7: that the shamrock is a suppository and it is Mongol is not correct. sent8: the orthoclase does not clinch Eyeish if there exists something such that it ramps shamrock and it is not a pope. sent9: if that the finback undercuts hold the fact that it is a kind of a chemisorption and is not a suppository is incorrect. sent10: that something clinches finback and is a bourbon is not correct if it does not clinch Eyeish. sent11: the shamrock is a kind of a chemisorption that does not hatch fresco. sent12: the finback is allomerous but it does not nuzzle. sent13: if something clinches hatmaker and is a suppository then that it is not a kind of a chemisorption hold. sent14: if something is a MArch that it does striate and/or it is not a Strombidae does not hold. sent15: the fact that something is a kind of Mongol thing that savors does not hold if it is not a chemisorption. sent16: the neon does ramp shamrock but it is not a pope. sent17: if something does not clinch hatmaker it is a chemisorption and is not a suppository. sent18: the shamrock does striate. sent19: if there exists something such that it is not a bourbon then that the shamrock does not clinch hatmaker and is not an undercut is not correct. sent20: there exists something such that it is not a relaxation and does not clinch gladdon. sent21: if the shamrock is striate then it is Mongol. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the shamrock savors and is not a pyxie does not hold.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the finback does not clinch hatmaker.; sent17 -> int2: the finback is a chemisorption but it is not a suppository if that it does not clinch hatmaker is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the finback is a chemisorption and is not a suppository.; sent9 & sent3 -> int4: that the finback is a kind of a chemisorption but it is not a suppository is wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the shamrock does savor but it is not a pyxie.; int6 -> int7: the shamrock savors.; sent21 & sent18 -> int8: the shamrock is Mongol.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__