the mineralogist is Singaporean and it is a nevirapine.
sent1: if something is not responsive that it is a kind of a Singaporean and it is a nevirapine is not true. sent2: the mineralogist is Singaporean thing that is a nevirapine if something looks roadhog. sent3: the halogeton is scholarly. sent4: if the halogeton interpolates Cabot then the vase is an anorexia. sent5: the mineralogist does not interpolate laceration. sent6: the fact that the mineralogist is a kind of a nevirapine is not false. sent7: the seer interpolates laceration. sent8: the halogeton is a kind of an anorexia if that the vase does interpolate Cabot hold. sent9: the mineralogist interpolates Cabot. sent10: the seer is not responsive. sent11: the voyager is not responsive if there is something such that it is not an anorexia. sent12: if something remainders then that it does not interpolate Allentown and is not a dell is not true. sent13: the halogeton is not responsive. sent14: something interpolates laceration and/or interpolates Cabot if it is not responsive. sent15: everything does not interpolate Allentown and it is not a kind of a dell. sent16: the vase is a kind of a Singaporean and looks crenelation. sent17: if the vase is a kind of an anorexia the seer does look roadhog. sent18: the nonconformist is an anorexia and/or it is a mastoid. sent19: something does look roadhog and/or is non-Singaporean if it is a nevirapine. sent20: if something interpolates laceration then the halogeton is a Singaporean. sent21: if something does look roadhog then the mineralogist is a nevirapine. sent22: something is not an anorexia if it looks roadhog. sent23: if the vase is responsive thing that does not look roadhog then the fact that the mineralogist is not responsive hold. sent24: the vase is a nevirapine if there is something such that that it does not interpolate Allentown and it is not a dell is incorrect. sent25: if something is not a Singaporean then it is not an anorexia.
sent14 -> int1: the halogeton interpolates laceration and/or it interpolates Cabot if it is not responsive.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: either the halogeton does interpolate laceration or it does interpolate Cabot or both.;
the fact that the mineralogist is a Singaporean that is a kind of a nevirapine is not true.
sent1 -> int3: if the mineralogist is not responsive then the fact that it is a Singaporean and it is a kind of a nevirapine is false.; sent15 -> int4: the fact that the seer does not interpolate Allentown and it is not a kind of a dell hold.; int4 -> int5: something does not interpolate Allentown and is not a dell.;
$hypothesis$ = the mineralogist is Singaporean and it is a nevirapine. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not responsive that it is a kind of a Singaporean and it is a nevirapine is not true. sent2: the mineralogist is Singaporean thing that is a nevirapine if something looks roadhog. sent3: the halogeton is scholarly. sent4: if the halogeton interpolates Cabot then the vase is an anorexia. sent5: the mineralogist does not interpolate laceration. sent6: the fact that the mineralogist is a kind of a nevirapine is not false. sent7: the seer interpolates laceration. sent8: the halogeton is a kind of an anorexia if that the vase does interpolate Cabot hold. sent9: the mineralogist interpolates Cabot. sent10: the seer is not responsive. sent11: the voyager is not responsive if there is something such that it is not an anorexia. sent12: if something remainders then that it does not interpolate Allentown and is not a dell is not true. sent13: the halogeton is not responsive. sent14: something interpolates laceration and/or interpolates Cabot if it is not responsive. sent15: everything does not interpolate Allentown and it is not a kind of a dell. sent16: the vase is a kind of a Singaporean and looks crenelation. sent17: if the vase is a kind of an anorexia the seer does look roadhog. sent18: the nonconformist is an anorexia and/or it is a mastoid. sent19: something does look roadhog and/or is non-Singaporean if it is a nevirapine. sent20: if something interpolates laceration then the halogeton is a Singaporean. sent21: if something does look roadhog then the mineralogist is a nevirapine. sent22: something is not an anorexia if it looks roadhog. sent23: if the vase is responsive thing that does not look roadhog then the fact that the mineralogist is not responsive hold. sent24: the vase is a nevirapine if there is something such that that it does not interpolate Allentown and it is not a dell is incorrect. sent25: if something is not a Singaporean then it is not an anorexia. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: the halogeton interpolates laceration and/or it interpolates Cabot if it is not responsive.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: either the halogeton does interpolate laceration or it does interpolate Cabot or both.; __UNKNOWN__