the purgative is not a toiletry or not metallic or both.
sent1: everything is not a representative and it is not discreet. sent2: the tarpan is not a metallic if the stump is a kind of non-regenerate thing that is a neurobiology. sent3: the purgative is not regenerate if the stump twines cephaloridine. sent4: the tarpan is not a kind of a metallic if the fact that it does not bark convalescence and is regenerate does not hold. sent5: the tarpan does not regenerate or it is not a kind of a toiletry or both if the purgative is not a toiletry. sent6: if the fact that something is not a neurobiology and does bark convalescence is not true then it is not a metallic. sent7: the tarpan is a wiggle if there is something such that that it is not reflective and it is a terrorist is not right. sent8: the tarpan is not regenerate if the stump is a neurobiology that barks convalescence. sent9: if that something is not representative is not incorrect the fact that it is not reflective but a terrorist is not right. sent10: if the stump is not a neurobiology but it barks convalescence the tarpan is not regenerate. sent11: the tarpan is not a kind of a neurobiology or it does not regenerate or both. sent12: the aspirator is a neurobiology. sent13: if the fact that something is not a kind of a toiletry but it barks convalescence is not right then the fact that it does not twine cephaloridine is not false. sent14: either the stump twines cephaloridine or it is not a kind of an accelerometer or both if that the tarpan is a wiggle hold. sent15: the purgative is not a toiletry and/or it is not metallic if the stump is not a metallic. sent16: if the stump is not an accelerometer the purgative is not regenerate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stump is not a neurobiology and barks convalescence.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the tarpan does not regenerate.; sent6 -> int2: the stump is not a kind of a metallic if the fact that it is not a neurobiology and barks convalescence is not right.;
the fact that the purgative either is not a toiletry or is not a kind of a metallic or both does not hold.
sent1 -> int3: the skateboard is a kind of nonrepresentative thing that is not discreet.; int3 -> int4: the skateboard is not a representative.; sent9 -> int5: if the skateboard is not a kind of a representative then that it is not reflective and it is a terrorist does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the skateboard is not reflective and is a kind of a terrorist is wrong.; int6 -> int7: there exists nothing that is non-reflective thing that is a kind of a terrorist.; int7 -> int8: the fact that the stream is not reflective but it is a terrorist is wrong.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that the fact that it is not reflective and is a kind of a terrorist does not hold.; int9 & sent7 -> int10: the tarpan is a wiggle.; sent14 & int10 -> int11: the stump does twine cephaloridine and/or it is not a kind of an accelerometer.; sent3 & sent16 & int11 -> int12: the purgative does not regenerate.;
$hypothesis$ = the purgative is not a toiletry or not metallic or both. ; $context$ = sent1: everything is not a representative and it is not discreet. sent2: the tarpan is not a metallic if the stump is a kind of non-regenerate thing that is a neurobiology. sent3: the purgative is not regenerate if the stump twines cephaloridine. sent4: the tarpan is not a kind of a metallic if the fact that it does not bark convalescence and is regenerate does not hold. sent5: the tarpan does not regenerate or it is not a kind of a toiletry or both if the purgative is not a toiletry. sent6: if the fact that something is not a neurobiology and does bark convalescence is not true then it is not a metallic. sent7: the tarpan is a wiggle if there is something such that that it is not reflective and it is a terrorist is not right. sent8: the tarpan is not regenerate if the stump is a neurobiology that barks convalescence. sent9: if that something is not representative is not incorrect the fact that it is not reflective but a terrorist is not right. sent10: if the stump is not a neurobiology but it barks convalescence the tarpan is not regenerate. sent11: the tarpan is not a kind of a neurobiology or it does not regenerate or both. sent12: the aspirator is a neurobiology. sent13: if the fact that something is not a kind of a toiletry but it barks convalescence is not right then the fact that it does not twine cephaloridine is not false. sent14: either the stump twines cephaloridine or it is not a kind of an accelerometer or both if that the tarpan is a wiggle hold. sent15: the purgative is not a toiletry and/or it is not metallic if the stump is not a metallic. sent16: if the stump is not an accelerometer the purgative is not regenerate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stump is not a neurobiology and barks convalescence.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the tarpan does not regenerate.; sent6 -> int2: the stump is not a kind of a metallic if the fact that it is not a neurobiology and barks convalescence is not right.; __UNKNOWN__