the mantel is not a kind of a mythologization.
sent1: if the fact that the garambulla vents festschrift is right it decoys pinnacle. sent2: the Satanist does not decoy hausmannite if that it does decoy hausmannite and it is a kind of a sonneteer is not true. sent3: the mantel is a mythologization if the Satanist is a kind of a mythologization. sent4: the Satanist is a sonneteer if the fact that the mantel is insubordinate is correct. sent5: that the Satanist is surficial is correct. sent6: something sterilizes firth. sent7: the mantel does decoy hausmannite if the fact that the garambulla decoys pinnacle is right. sent8: if there exists something such that it sterilizes firth then the Satanist is insubordinate and is not a rheumatologist. sent9: the mantel does not impersonate. sent10: the Satanist is not a rheumatologist if it is a mythologization and it is a sonneteer. sent11: if the mantel decoys hausmannite and is a mythologization it is not a sonneteer. sent12: the Satanist is both a rheumatologist and insubordinate if it does not vent festschrift. sent13: the Satanist is not a rheumatologist. sent14: something does not vent festschrift but it decoys pinnacle if it does decoy hausmannite. sent15: the garambulla vents festschrift if the Satanist is insubordinate but it is not a kind of a rheumatologist. sent16: the garambulla vents festschrift if the Satanist is insubordinate and it is a rheumatologist. sent17: the mantel is a kind of a sonneteer. sent18: if the Satanist does not sterilize firth then the geomancer is a kind of a sonneteer but it is not an easel. sent19: something is a mythologization if it does sterilize firth. sent20: the fact that the Satanist decoys hausmannite and it is a sonneteer is not true. sent21: there is something such that it is not a sheared and is a sonneteer. sent22: that something is both not subordinate and a rheumatologist if it does not vent festschrift is correct. sent23: the Satanist is not a rheumatologist if something does sterilize firth.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the Satanist is insubordinate but it is not a rheumatologist.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the garambulla does vent festschrift.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the garambulla does decoy pinnacle.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mantel decoys hausmannite.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mantel is a mythologization.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the mantel decoys hausmannite and is a mythologization.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the mantel is not a kind of a sonneteer.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the mantel is a mythologization.
sent19 -> int8: if the Satanist sterilizes firth it is a kind of a mythologization.; sent22 -> int9: the Satanist is both insubordinate and a rheumatologist if the fact that it does not vent festschrift hold.; sent14 -> int10: if that the Satanist decoys hausmannite is right then it does not vent festschrift and it does decoy pinnacle.;
$hypothesis$ = the mantel is not a kind of a mythologization. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the garambulla vents festschrift is right it decoys pinnacle. sent2: the Satanist does not decoy hausmannite if that it does decoy hausmannite and it is a kind of a sonneteer is not true. sent3: the mantel is a mythologization if the Satanist is a kind of a mythologization. sent4: the Satanist is a sonneteer if the fact that the mantel is insubordinate is correct. sent5: that the Satanist is surficial is correct. sent6: something sterilizes firth. sent7: the mantel does decoy hausmannite if the fact that the garambulla decoys pinnacle is right. sent8: if there exists something such that it sterilizes firth then the Satanist is insubordinate and is not a rheumatologist. sent9: the mantel does not impersonate. sent10: the Satanist is not a rheumatologist if it is a mythologization and it is a sonneteer. sent11: if the mantel decoys hausmannite and is a mythologization it is not a sonneteer. sent12: the Satanist is both a rheumatologist and insubordinate if it does not vent festschrift. sent13: the Satanist is not a rheumatologist. sent14: something does not vent festschrift but it decoys pinnacle if it does decoy hausmannite. sent15: the garambulla vents festschrift if the Satanist is insubordinate but it is not a kind of a rheumatologist. sent16: the garambulla vents festschrift if the Satanist is insubordinate and it is a rheumatologist. sent17: the mantel is a kind of a sonneteer. sent18: if the Satanist does not sterilize firth then the geomancer is a kind of a sonneteer but it is not an easel. sent19: something is a mythologization if it does sterilize firth. sent20: the fact that the Satanist decoys hausmannite and it is a sonneteer is not true. sent21: there is something such that it is not a sheared and is a sonneteer. sent22: that something is both not subordinate and a rheumatologist if it does not vent festschrift is correct. sent23: the Satanist is not a rheumatologist if something does sterilize firth. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the Satanist is insubordinate but it is not a rheumatologist.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the garambulla does vent festschrift.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the garambulla does decoy pinnacle.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mantel decoys hausmannite.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mantel is a mythologization.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the mantel decoys hausmannite and is a mythologization.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the mantel is not a kind of a sonneteer.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__