the cyberpunk sentimentalises debugger and/or is isentropic.
sent1: the cyberpunk is not Ionic if the smallholder is a deadline that is Ionic. sent2: the scute is a deadline if the bones is Ionic. sent3: the cyberpunk is a kind of a Schinus if the scute does sentimentalise debugger. sent4: something is not a Schinus if that it is a kind of a deadline or it is not Ionic or both is false. sent5: if the bones is Ionic then the fact that the scute either is not a deadline or is not Ionic or both is not correct. sent6: if that the skink is an innocent is not false the toothpaste is a kind of a Agropyron. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a deadline and/or it is not Ionic is incorrect then it is not a Schinus. sent8: the skink does not sentimentalise debugger. sent9: if the smallholder does not sentimentalise Hindustan it is a kind of a deadline and it is a kind of a Schinus. sent10: the bones is not isentropic. sent11: if the smallholder does sentimentalise debugger then the bones is Ionic. sent12: the cyberpunk either sentimentalises debugger or is isentropic or both if the smallholder does not sentimentalises debugger. sent13: the skink is a kind of an innocent if the scute is not a kind of a Schinus. sent14: the scute is a deadline. sent15: the toothpaste is not a Agropyron. sent16: if something is not Ionic the fact that either it sentimentalises debugger or it is isentropic or both is not correct. sent17: the fact that either the lovage is non-African or it is not a righteousness or both is not right. sent18: if something is not an innocent then the fact that it is Ionic is right. sent19: if the fact that either the scute is a deadline or it is not Ionic or both is not true it is not a Schinus.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the smallholder sentimentalises debugger hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bones is Ionic is not false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the scute is either not a deadline or not Ionic or both is not true.; sent7 -> int3: if the fact that the scute is not a deadline and/or it is not Ionic is false then it is not a kind of a Schinus.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the scute is not a kind of a Schinus.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the skink is an innocent.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the toothpaste is a Agropyron.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the smallholder does not sentimentalise debugger.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the cyberpunk does sentimentalise debugger or is isentropic or both does not hold.
sent16 -> int9: if the cyberpunk is not Ionic then the fact that it does sentimentalise debugger and/or it is isentropic is not right.; sent18 -> int10: if the smallholder is not an innocent the fact that it is Ionic hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the cyberpunk sentimentalises debugger and/or is isentropic. ; $context$ = sent1: the cyberpunk is not Ionic if the smallholder is a deadline that is Ionic. sent2: the scute is a deadline if the bones is Ionic. sent3: the cyberpunk is a kind of a Schinus if the scute does sentimentalise debugger. sent4: something is not a Schinus if that it is a kind of a deadline or it is not Ionic or both is false. sent5: if the bones is Ionic then the fact that the scute either is not a deadline or is not Ionic or both is not correct. sent6: if that the skink is an innocent is not false the toothpaste is a kind of a Agropyron. sent7: if the fact that something is not a kind of a deadline and/or it is not Ionic is incorrect then it is not a Schinus. sent8: the skink does not sentimentalise debugger. sent9: if the smallholder does not sentimentalise Hindustan it is a kind of a deadline and it is a kind of a Schinus. sent10: the bones is not isentropic. sent11: if the smallholder does sentimentalise debugger then the bones is Ionic. sent12: the cyberpunk either sentimentalises debugger or is isentropic or both if the smallholder does not sentimentalises debugger. sent13: the skink is a kind of an innocent if the scute is not a kind of a Schinus. sent14: the scute is a deadline. sent15: the toothpaste is not a Agropyron. sent16: if something is not Ionic the fact that either it sentimentalises debugger or it is isentropic or both is not correct. sent17: the fact that either the lovage is non-African or it is not a righteousness or both is not right. sent18: if something is not an innocent then the fact that it is Ionic is right. sent19: if the fact that either the scute is a deadline or it is not Ionic or both is not true it is not a Schinus. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the smallholder sentimentalises debugger hold.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bones is Ionic is not false.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the scute is either not a deadline or not Ionic or both is not true.; sent7 -> int3: if the fact that the scute is not a deadline and/or it is not Ionic is false then it is not a kind of a Schinus.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the scute is not a kind of a Schinus.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the skink is an innocent.; int5 & sent6 -> int6: the toothpaste is a Agropyron.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the smallholder does not sentimentalise debugger.; int8 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__