that the trichroism is transcendental and it is unsavory is not wrong.
sent1: the twiddler is not a kind of a file if the trichroism is not a file but it glorifies. sent2: if something is transcendental the trichroism is not a file and does glorify. sent3: the penicillin unspells addend. sent4: the gobbler is not a watering if the outrider rustles Giraudoux or it does not watering or both. sent5: the erythrite is morphologic if something is not angiomatous but it is a kind of a amicability. sent6: something does rustle Giraudoux and/or it is not a watering if it is a microwave. sent7: if something is morphologic it is transcendental. sent8: if something does not water then the fact that it is transcendental and it is unsavory is wrong. sent9: the fact that the trichroism is unsavory is right. sent10: if there exists something such that it unspells addend that the chlorobenzene does estivate is not wrong. sent11: the twiddler is not unsavory if either something does not rustle Giraudoux or it does rustle planner or both. sent12: the constantan rustles Giraudoux or does rustle planner or both. sent13: the chlorobenzene is not angiomatous but it is a amicability if it estivates. sent14: the trichroism is transcendental and is unsavory if the twiddler is not unsavory. sent15: if the outrider is not a watering then the fact that the trichroism is a kind of a watering is not false. sent16: the outrider is a watering. sent17: if the outrider does water and/or is a microwave the constantan does not rustle Giraudoux. sent18: the fact that the constantan is non-unsavory thing that does not rustle planner is not true if the twiddler is not a file. sent19: if the twiddler is not unsavory the trichroism is unsavory.
sent16 -> int1: that the outrider is a watering or is a kind of a microwave or both is not wrong.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the constantan does not rustle Giraudoux.; int2 -> int3: either the constantan does not rustle Giraudoux or it rustles planner or both.; int3 -> int4: either something does not rustle Giraudoux or it rustles planner or both.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the twiddler is not unsavory.; sent14 & int5 -> hypothesis;
that the trichroism is transcendental and it is unsavory is not true.
sent8 -> int6: if the outrider does not water that it is both transcendental and unsavory is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that the trichroism is transcendental and it is unsavory is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the twiddler is not a kind of a file if the trichroism is not a file but it glorifies. sent2: if something is transcendental the trichroism is not a file and does glorify. sent3: the penicillin unspells addend. sent4: the gobbler is not a watering if the outrider rustles Giraudoux or it does not watering or both. sent5: the erythrite is morphologic if something is not angiomatous but it is a kind of a amicability. sent6: something does rustle Giraudoux and/or it is not a watering if it is a microwave. sent7: if something is morphologic it is transcendental. sent8: if something does not water then the fact that it is transcendental and it is unsavory is wrong. sent9: the fact that the trichroism is unsavory is right. sent10: if there exists something such that it unspells addend that the chlorobenzene does estivate is not wrong. sent11: the twiddler is not unsavory if either something does not rustle Giraudoux or it does rustle planner or both. sent12: the constantan rustles Giraudoux or does rustle planner or both. sent13: the chlorobenzene is not angiomatous but it is a amicability if it estivates. sent14: the trichroism is transcendental and is unsavory if the twiddler is not unsavory. sent15: if the outrider is not a watering then the fact that the trichroism is a kind of a watering is not false. sent16: the outrider is a watering. sent17: if the outrider does water and/or is a microwave the constantan does not rustle Giraudoux. sent18: the fact that the constantan is non-unsavory thing that does not rustle planner is not true if the twiddler is not a file. sent19: if the twiddler is not unsavory the trichroism is unsavory. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: that the outrider is a watering or is a kind of a microwave or both is not wrong.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the constantan does not rustle Giraudoux.; int2 -> int3: either the constantan does not rustle Giraudoux or it rustles planner or both.; int3 -> int4: either something does not rustle Giraudoux or it rustles planner or both.; int4 & sent11 -> int5: the twiddler is not unsavory.; sent14 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__