there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Antum and/or is not nonviolent is false it does not amplify esprit.
sent1: there is something such that if the fact that either it is not a sarcophagus or it is not a kind of a siding or both does not hold then it is not carbonaceous. sent2: there exists something such that if it is either not a Antum or not nonviolent or both then it does not amplify esprit. sent3: if the ephemera is not civic and/or it does not amplify esprit then it is not a kind of an overview. sent4: if that the ephemera is a Antum and/or it is not nonviolent does not hold then it does not amplify esprit. sent5: if that the knickknack does not spoil naturalism and/or it is not nonviolent is wrong it is a spindleberry. sent6: if that the Salvadoran does not amplify esprit and/or it is not a Updike is not correct then it is not a cross-fertilization. sent7: there is something such that if that it does not debrief sublease and/or it is not a orthoepist is not right the fact that it is non-behavioral is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a northeast and/or does not surface naturalism then it is not regimental. sent9: if the fact that either something does not amplify esprit or it is not siding or both is not true then it is not a Updike. sent10: the ephemera does not amplify esprit if that either it is not a Antum or it is nonviolent or both is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the pamperer does not spoil static and/or it does not debrief oppressor does not hold it is nonviolent. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is a Antum or it is not nonviolent or both is not true then it does not amplify esprit. sent13: if that the ephemera is not a Antum and/or it is not nonviolent does not hold it does not amplify esprit. sent14: there is something such that if that either it is not coital or it does not amplify intransitivity or both does not hold it does gap. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Antum or not violent or both is false then it does not amplify esprit. sent16: if the fact that the ephemera does not marry and/or does not amplify esprit is false then it is not dynastic. sent17: if that something does not face or is not a lampshade or both is not right it is not anginal. sent18: there is something such that if that it either is not a Antum or is not nonviolent or both does not hold then it does amplify esprit. sent19: if the ephemera is not a sack and/or it is not nonviolent then it does not ferment.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if the fact that it is not a face and/or is not a lampshade is not true the fact that it is not anginal is true.
sent17 -> int1: if the fact that the recess is not a kind of a face and/or is not a lampshade is not true then it is not anginal.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if the fact that it is not a kind of a Antum and/or is not nonviolent is false it does not amplify esprit. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if the fact that either it is not a sarcophagus or it is not a kind of a siding or both does not hold then it is not carbonaceous. sent2: there exists something such that if it is either not a Antum or not nonviolent or both then it does not amplify esprit. sent3: if the ephemera is not civic and/or it does not amplify esprit then it is not a kind of an overview. sent4: if that the ephemera is a Antum and/or it is not nonviolent does not hold then it does not amplify esprit. sent5: if that the knickknack does not spoil naturalism and/or it is not nonviolent is wrong it is a spindleberry. sent6: if that the Salvadoran does not amplify esprit and/or it is not a Updike is not correct then it is not a cross-fertilization. sent7: there is something such that if that it does not debrief sublease and/or it is not a orthoepist is not right the fact that it is non-behavioral is not false. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a northeast and/or does not surface naturalism then it is not regimental. sent9: if the fact that either something does not amplify esprit or it is not siding or both is not true then it is not a Updike. sent10: the ephemera does not amplify esprit if that either it is not a Antum or it is nonviolent or both is wrong. sent11: if the fact that the pamperer does not spoil static and/or it does not debrief oppressor does not hold it is nonviolent. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is a Antum or it is not nonviolent or both is not true then it does not amplify esprit. sent13: if that the ephemera is not a Antum and/or it is not nonviolent does not hold it does not amplify esprit. sent14: there is something such that if that either it is not coital or it does not amplify intransitivity or both does not hold it does gap. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a Antum or not violent or both is false then it does not amplify esprit. sent16: if the fact that the ephemera does not marry and/or does not amplify esprit is false then it is not dynastic. sent17: if that something does not face or is not a lampshade or both is not right it is not anginal. sent18: there is something such that if that it either is not a Antum or is not nonviolent or both does not hold then it does amplify esprit. sent19: if the ephemera is not a sack and/or it is not nonviolent then it does not ferment. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__