that the belle is not bentonitic but it is not non-gross is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that the belle does not brazen trimming and it is not karyokinetic is not wrong if the upholstery is not a Platanus. sent2: the fact that something is not bentonitic but gross is false if it does not brazen trimming. sent3: if that that the fact that the lovastatin does not brazen climacteric and it is not a kind of a gauntlet hold is not correct is right the denaturant is not a kind of a royalism. sent4: if something sidles then it is non-bentonitic a gross. sent5: the timberline does corrupt if the denaturant is not a kind of a royalism. sent6: that the lovastatin does not brazen climacteric and is not a gauntlet is not right if the wicket-keeper does donate. sent7: that the upholstery is not corrupt and it is not accommodative is incorrect if the timberline is corrupt. sent8: if the belle is a Platanus the fact that the denaturant is non-bentonitic but not a royalism is wrong. sent9: the fact that the wicket-keeper does donate is not incorrect if it does sidle. sent10: the wicket-keeper sidles.
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the wicket-keeper donates.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the lovastatin does not brazen climacteric and is not a gauntlet is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the denaturant is not a royalism.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the timberline does corrupt.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the upholstery is not corrupt and it is not accommodative is incorrect.; sent2 -> int6: if the belle does not brazen trimming the fact that it is not bentonitic and does gross is not right.;
the belle is not bentonitic and not non-gross.
sent4 -> int7: if the belle sidles then it is not bentonitic and it grosses.;
$hypothesis$ = that the belle is not bentonitic but it is not non-gross is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the belle does not brazen trimming and it is not karyokinetic is not wrong if the upholstery is not a Platanus. sent2: the fact that something is not bentonitic but gross is false if it does not brazen trimming. sent3: if that that the fact that the lovastatin does not brazen climacteric and it is not a kind of a gauntlet hold is not correct is right the denaturant is not a kind of a royalism. sent4: if something sidles then it is non-bentonitic a gross. sent5: the timberline does corrupt if the denaturant is not a kind of a royalism. sent6: that the lovastatin does not brazen climacteric and is not a gauntlet is not right if the wicket-keeper does donate. sent7: that the upholstery is not corrupt and it is not accommodative is incorrect if the timberline is corrupt. sent8: if the belle is a Platanus the fact that the denaturant is non-bentonitic but not a royalism is wrong. sent9: the fact that the wicket-keeper does donate is not incorrect if it does sidle. sent10: the wicket-keeper sidles. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the wicket-keeper donates.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: that the lovastatin does not brazen climacteric and is not a gauntlet is incorrect.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the denaturant is not a royalism.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the timberline does corrupt.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the fact that the upholstery is not corrupt and it is not accommodative is incorrect.; sent2 -> int6: if the belle does not brazen trimming the fact that it is not bentonitic and does gross is not right.; __UNKNOWN__