the fact that the fact that the chloroacetophenone is prophetic or is not a secondary or both is wrong is correct.
sent1: if the dissolving is not a condition and not unattractive the chloroacetophenone is not unattractive. sent2: a Taiwanese is not unattractive. sent3: if something is a triggerfish then the fact that it is a kind of a CO2 is not wrong. sent4: something is craniometric if it is unattractive. sent5: that the dissolving is not unattractive but it does compass is wrong if the chloroacetophenone does compass. sent6: if the dissolving is unattractive then it is craniometric. sent7: if that the chloroacetophenone is a compass is not wrong then that the dissolving is unattractive and it compass is incorrect. sent8: the Lord is not non-neuropsychiatric. sent9: if the Lord is neuropsychiatric then it is a condition. sent10: the Lord is both craniometric and a Taiwanese. sent11: if something is not craniometric then that either it is prophetic or it is not a secondary or both does not hold. sent12: if the redoubt is a CO2 the dissolving is a Taiwanese. sent13: the chloroacetophenone is a compass if the fact that it is prophetic and/or it is not a secondary is incorrect. sent14: the chloroacetophenone is a secondary. sent15: something does not condition if the fact that it does condition and it is neuropsychiatric is not right. sent16: if something is not unattractive then the fact that it is a compass and it is craniometric does not hold. sent17: something is craniometric if that it is both not unattractive and a compass is wrong. sent18: if the Lord is a condition and it is craniometric the dissolving is craniometric. sent19: either the redoubt is a kind of a truculence or it is a triggerfish or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chloroacetophenone is prophetic and/or it is not a kind of a secondary is not true.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the chloroacetophenone does compass.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the dissolving is not unattractive but it does compass does not hold.; sent17 -> int3: if the fact that the dissolving is not unattractive but it is a kind of a compass is not true it is craniometric.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the dissolving is craniometric.; sent9 & sent8 -> int5: the Lord conditions.; sent10 -> int6: the Lord is craniometric.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Lord does condition and is craniometric.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the dissolving is not craniometric.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the chloroacetophenone either is prophetic or is not a secondary or both is not right.
sent11 -> int10: if the chloroacetophenone is not craniometric the fact that it is prophetic or it is not a kind of a secondary or both is wrong.; sent16 -> int11: the fact that the chloroacetophenone is a compass and it is craniometric is wrong if it is not unattractive.; sent15 -> int12: if that the Lord conditions and it is neuropsychiatric is not true then it is not a conditions.; sent2 -> int13: if the dissolving is not non-Taiwanese it is not unattractive.; sent3 -> int14: the redoubt is a CO2 if it is a triggerfish.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the chloroacetophenone is prophetic or is not a secondary or both is wrong is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the dissolving is not a condition and not unattractive the chloroacetophenone is not unattractive. sent2: a Taiwanese is not unattractive. sent3: if something is a triggerfish then the fact that it is a kind of a CO2 is not wrong. sent4: something is craniometric if it is unattractive. sent5: that the dissolving is not unattractive but it does compass is wrong if the chloroacetophenone does compass. sent6: if the dissolving is unattractive then it is craniometric. sent7: if that the chloroacetophenone is a compass is not wrong then that the dissolving is unattractive and it compass is incorrect. sent8: the Lord is not non-neuropsychiatric. sent9: if the Lord is neuropsychiatric then it is a condition. sent10: the Lord is both craniometric and a Taiwanese. sent11: if something is not craniometric then that either it is prophetic or it is not a secondary or both does not hold. sent12: if the redoubt is a CO2 the dissolving is a Taiwanese. sent13: the chloroacetophenone is a compass if the fact that it is prophetic and/or it is not a secondary is incorrect. sent14: the chloroacetophenone is a secondary. sent15: something does not condition if the fact that it does condition and it is neuropsychiatric is not right. sent16: if something is not unattractive then the fact that it is a compass and it is craniometric does not hold. sent17: something is craniometric if that it is both not unattractive and a compass is wrong. sent18: if the Lord is a condition and it is craniometric the dissolving is craniometric. sent19: either the redoubt is a kind of a truculence or it is a triggerfish or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chloroacetophenone is prophetic and/or it is not a kind of a secondary is not true.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the chloroacetophenone does compass.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the fact that the dissolving is not unattractive but it does compass does not hold.; sent17 -> int3: if the fact that the dissolving is not unattractive but it is a kind of a compass is not true it is craniometric.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the dissolving is craniometric.; sent9 & sent8 -> int5: the Lord conditions.; sent10 -> int6: the Lord is craniometric.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Lord does condition and is craniometric.; sent18 & int7 -> int8: the dissolving is not craniometric.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__