the fact that there exists something such that it is a wrangler or it is not a kind of a nativist or both is wrong.
sent1: the musnud is eparchial and it is a mnemonics. sent2: if the stippler does not wean concussion that the ampicillin does not wean concussion and is a central is incorrect. sent3: something is not a varsity if the fact that it does not spectate Shepard and it is eparchial is not correct. sent4: the stippler is not a fascista. sent5: the ampicillin is a seventy. sent6: the ampicillin is not a kind of a varsity if that it does not spectate Shepard is right. sent7: the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard if that the musnud is a wrangler or it is a nativist or both is not right. sent8: if something does not thrombose ampicillin then it is not a Galloway. sent9: the stippler is not a longitude. sent10: if that the musnud is a wrangler or it is not a nativist or both is false then the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard. sent11: something is a wrangler and/or nativist. sent12: the ampicillin is not a varsity. sent13: something does not wean concussion if it is not a varsity. sent14: the musnud is a kind of a nativist. sent15: the fact that the stippler does spectate Shepard and it is eparchial is not right. sent16: if the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard the fact that the stippler does not spectate Shepard and is eparchial is false. sent17: if that the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard but it is a central is not correct then it is not eparchial. sent18: the ampicillin is not eparchial. sent19: if that either the ampicillin is nativist or it is not a wrangler or both is incorrect the musnud does not spectate Shepard. sent20: if the stippler is not dishonest then it weans concussion and it is central. sent21: the fact that the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard if the ampicillin is not parametric is not false. sent22: the ampicillin is non-Satanic if that it is non-ectomorphic a bearberry is incorrect. sent23: the fact that the stippler is not dishonest is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that either the musnud is a wrangler or it is non-nativist or both does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the stippler does not spectate Shepard and is eparchial does not hold.; sent3 -> int3: the stippler is not a varsity if the fact that it does not spectate Shepard and it is eparchial is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the stippler is not a kind of a varsity is correct.; sent13 -> int5: if the fact that the stippler is not a varsity is right it does not wean concussion.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stippler does not wean concussion.; sent20 & sent23 -> int7: the stippler weans concussion and is central.; int7 -> int8: the stippler weans concussion.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the musnud either is a wrangler or is not a nativist or both.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that it is a wrangler or it is not a kind of a nativist or both is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the musnud is eparchial and it is a mnemonics. sent2: if the stippler does not wean concussion that the ampicillin does not wean concussion and is a central is incorrect. sent3: something is not a varsity if the fact that it does not spectate Shepard and it is eparchial is not correct. sent4: the stippler is not a fascista. sent5: the ampicillin is a seventy. sent6: the ampicillin is not a kind of a varsity if that it does not spectate Shepard is right. sent7: the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard if that the musnud is a wrangler or it is a nativist or both is not right. sent8: if something does not thrombose ampicillin then it is not a Galloway. sent9: the stippler is not a longitude. sent10: if that the musnud is a wrangler or it is not a nativist or both is false then the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard. sent11: something is a wrangler and/or nativist. sent12: the ampicillin is not a varsity. sent13: something does not wean concussion if it is not a varsity. sent14: the musnud is a kind of a nativist. sent15: the fact that the stippler does spectate Shepard and it is eparchial is not right. sent16: if the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard the fact that the stippler does not spectate Shepard and is eparchial is false. sent17: if that the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard but it is a central is not correct then it is not eparchial. sent18: the ampicillin is not eparchial. sent19: if that either the ampicillin is nativist or it is not a wrangler or both is incorrect the musnud does not spectate Shepard. sent20: if the stippler is not dishonest then it weans concussion and it is central. sent21: the fact that the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard if the ampicillin is not parametric is not false. sent22: the ampicillin is non-Satanic if that it is non-ectomorphic a bearberry is incorrect. sent23: the fact that the stippler is not dishonest is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that either the musnud is a wrangler or it is non-nativist or both does not hold.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: the ampicillin does not spectate Shepard.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the fact that the stippler does not spectate Shepard and is eparchial does not hold.; sent3 -> int3: the stippler is not a varsity if the fact that it does not spectate Shepard and it is eparchial is not correct.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the stippler is not a kind of a varsity is correct.; sent13 -> int5: if the fact that the stippler is not a varsity is right it does not wean concussion.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the stippler does not wean concussion.; sent20 & sent23 -> int7: the stippler weans concussion and is central.; int7 -> int8: the stippler weans concussion.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the musnud either is a wrangler or is not a nativist or both.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__