the fact that if the acid is not a Tosk the redshift is not kinetic and it is not actinic is not right.
sent1: the fact that the redshift is a kind of an immortal and/or it is not caruncular is false. sent2: if that that the sedan does not defibrillate lecherousness and is a hypocorism hold is incorrect then it is a wingspan. sent3: the redshift is malign. sent4: the fact that the redshift is not kinetic is true if it is not non-malign and not noninheritable. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Tosk and not a wingspan is not right then it does not defibrillate lecherousness. sent6: if something is not a wingspan then that it is not inheritable and is not a Tosk is wrong. sent7: if that the fact that the acid is not inheritable and is not a Tosk is right is false the sedan is a Tosk. sent8: the fact that something is not a unobtrusiveness and is not non-anemic is not true if it is a kind of a Tosk. sent9: the Kaopectate is a kind of a name and it is kinetic. sent10: the redshift is kinetic and it is malign if the speciation is not actinic. sent11: the redshift is both not a wingspan and not actinic if that the sedan is inheritable is right. sent12: the fact that the redshift is caruncular hold. sent13: the fact that that the sedan is not a Tosk and it is not malign is correct is not right if it is inheritable. sent14: the fact that the sedan does not defibrillate lecherousness but it is a kind of a hypocorism is not true if the acid is not a kind of a Tosk. sent15: if that the sedan is a wingspan is right the redshift is inheritable. sent16: the redshift is not actinic if the fact that it is an immortal or it is caruncular or both is not right. sent17: if the fact that the redshift is an immortal or is not caruncular or both does not hold then it is not actinic. sent18: if the fact that the sedan is non-caruncular is true then the redshift is not an immortal and it is not inheritable.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acid is not a kind of a Tosk.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sedan does not defibrillate lecherousness and is a hypocorism does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the sedan is a wingspan.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the redshift is inheritable.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the redshift is malign and is inheritable.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the redshift is not kinetic hold.; sent17 & sent1 -> int6: the redshift is not actinic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the redshift is both not kinetic and not actinic.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the cacique does not defibrillate lecherousness.
sent5 -> int8: if that the cacique is not a kind of a Tosk and it is not a wingspan does not hold then it does not defibrillate lecherousness.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the acid is not a Tosk the redshift is not kinetic and it is not actinic is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the redshift is a kind of an immortal and/or it is not caruncular is false. sent2: if that that the sedan does not defibrillate lecherousness and is a hypocorism hold is incorrect then it is a wingspan. sent3: the redshift is malign. sent4: the fact that the redshift is not kinetic is true if it is not non-malign and not noninheritable. sent5: if the fact that something is not a Tosk and not a wingspan is not right then it does not defibrillate lecherousness. sent6: if something is not a wingspan then that it is not inheritable and is not a Tosk is wrong. sent7: if that the fact that the acid is not inheritable and is not a Tosk is right is false the sedan is a Tosk. sent8: the fact that something is not a unobtrusiveness and is not non-anemic is not true if it is a kind of a Tosk. sent9: the Kaopectate is a kind of a name and it is kinetic. sent10: the redshift is kinetic and it is malign if the speciation is not actinic. sent11: the redshift is both not a wingspan and not actinic if that the sedan is inheritable is right. sent12: the fact that the redshift is caruncular hold. sent13: the fact that that the sedan is not a Tosk and it is not malign is correct is not right if it is inheritable. sent14: the fact that the sedan does not defibrillate lecherousness but it is a kind of a hypocorism is not true if the acid is not a kind of a Tosk. sent15: if that the sedan is a wingspan is right the redshift is inheritable. sent16: the redshift is not actinic if the fact that it is an immortal or it is caruncular or both is not right. sent17: if the fact that the redshift is an immortal or is not caruncular or both does not hold then it is not actinic. sent18: if the fact that the sedan is non-caruncular is true then the redshift is not an immortal and it is not inheritable. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acid is not a kind of a Tosk.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sedan does not defibrillate lecherousness and is a hypocorism does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the sedan is a wingspan.; int2 & sent15 -> int3: the redshift is inheritable.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the redshift is malign and is inheritable.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: that the redshift is not kinetic hold.; sent17 & sent1 -> int6: the redshift is not actinic.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the redshift is both not kinetic and not actinic.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__