the fact that that the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss and is nonparticulate is wrong if the cresol is a corticosteroid is not incorrect.
sent1: the cresol is not a corticosteroid if that it either is radial or does jab or both is not correct. sent2: the cresol is a radial. sent3: if the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss the fact that the cresol is a kind of a radial is true. sent4: if the fact that something is not a radial and/or does jab does not hold then it is not a kind of a corticosteroid. sent5: the fact that the Austronesian does platinize microgauss and is nonparticulate does not hold. sent6: if the cresol is a corticosteroid the fact that the Austronesian platinizes microgauss and is nonparticulate does not hold. sent7: that the Austronesian does not jab and/or it is nonparticulate is not true if the cresol is not radial. sent8: if the fact that the cresol is not a radial or a jab or both is not true the fact that it is a corticosteroid is not wrong.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss and is nonparticulate.; assump2 -> int1: the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss.; sent4 -> int2: the cresol is not a kind of a corticosteroid if the fact that the fact that either it is not a radial or it does jab or both is not wrong is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss and is nonparticulate is wrong if the cresol is a corticosteroid is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the cresol is not a corticosteroid if that it either is radial or does jab or both is not correct. sent2: the cresol is a radial. sent3: if the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss the fact that the cresol is a kind of a radial is true. sent4: if the fact that something is not a radial and/or does jab does not hold then it is not a kind of a corticosteroid. sent5: the fact that the Austronesian does platinize microgauss and is nonparticulate does not hold. sent6: if the cresol is a corticosteroid the fact that the Austronesian platinizes microgauss and is nonparticulate does not hold. sent7: that the Austronesian does not jab and/or it is nonparticulate is not true if the cresol is not radial. sent8: if the fact that the cresol is not a radial or a jab or both is not true the fact that it is a corticosteroid is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss and is nonparticulate.; assump2 -> int1: the Austronesian does not platinize microgauss.; sent4 -> int2: the cresol is not a kind of a corticosteroid if the fact that the fact that either it is not a radial or it does jab or both is not wrong is not right.; __UNKNOWN__