that there is something such that if it is a supremacist the fact that it is lobate hold is wrong.
sent1: the microphoning is a kind of a Nicaragua. sent2: something is lobate if it is a contrasting. sent3: something does contrast if it is a supremacist. sent4: if the microphoning does rede trinketry it is lobate. sent5: if the microphoning adheres scherzo that it is parametric is not false. sent6: something is unangry if it is downstream. sent7: if something does adhere peritoneum it adheres Doctorow. sent8: if the kinescope is a latrine then it is lobate. sent9: the microphoning is a breechblock. sent10: the microphoning is bromidic. sent11: if the microphoning is a supremacist it is a computer. sent12: the warrener is not non-citrous. sent13: the microphoning is an airship if it contrasts. sent14: if something frets e-mail then it is a superfecundation. sent15: the microphoning shoos screwdriver.
sent3 -> int1: if the microphoning is a supremacist it does contrast.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the microphoning is a supremacist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the microphoning contrasts is correct.; sent2 -> int3: the microphoning is lobate if it is a kind of a contrasting.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the microphoning is lobate.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the microphoning is lobate if it is a supremacist.; int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a supremacist the fact that it is lobate hold is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the microphoning is a kind of a Nicaragua. sent2: something is lobate if it is a contrasting. sent3: something does contrast if it is a supremacist. sent4: if the microphoning does rede trinketry it is lobate. sent5: if the microphoning adheres scherzo that it is parametric is not false. sent6: something is unangry if it is downstream. sent7: if something does adhere peritoneum it adheres Doctorow. sent8: if the kinescope is a latrine then it is lobate. sent9: the microphoning is a breechblock. sent10: the microphoning is bromidic. sent11: if the microphoning is a supremacist it is a computer. sent12: the warrener is not non-citrous. sent13: the microphoning is an airship if it contrasts. sent14: if something frets e-mail then it is a superfecundation. sent15: the microphoning shoos screwdriver. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the microphoning is a supremacist it does contrast.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the microphoning is a supremacist.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the microphoning contrasts is correct.; sent2 -> int3: the microphoning is lobate if it is a kind of a contrasting.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the microphoning is lobate.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the microphoning is lobate if it is a supremacist.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__