the curbstone is a stockist and not a Melospiza.
sent1: the starflower does flesh spinsterhood. sent2: if the zone is not phonological that it does flesh heliotherapy and it does not flesh coontie is not right. sent3: the Pamlico is a Stilwell. sent4: the curbstone does flesh coontie but it is not a Melospiza. sent5: if the effervescence does not flesh spinsterhood the Pamlico does flesh coontie and is inarticulate. sent6: the Rhabdoviridae does flesh coontie and is not inarticulate if the fact that the Pamlico is a terrier hold. sent7: the Rhabdoviridae is a terrier if the Pamlico does flesh coontie. sent8: the curbstone is a kind of a stockist but it is not a Melospiza if the Rhabdoviridae is a terrier. sent9: the zone does flesh heliotherapy and is not a Stilwell if the effervescence fleshes spinsterhood. sent10: the fact that if the Pamlico is not the stockist the fact that the Pamlico does flesh heliotherapy and does flesh coontie does not hold is not false. sent11: the fact that the curbstone fleshes spinsterhood and is a stockist is wrong if it is not a kind of a Stilwell. sent12: the zone is not phonological. sent13: that the zone does flesh heliotherapy and is not a kind of a Stilwell does not hold if it is not phonological. sent14: the curbstone does not flesh spinsterhood. sent15: the Rhabdoviridae fleshes heliotherapy if that the zone is a terrier is right. sent16: the zone is a terrier but it is not a Stilwell if the Rhabdoviridae is phonological. sent17: the effervescence is a kind of a stockist. sent18: something is a kind of a terrier but it is not inarticulate.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the effervescence fleshes spinsterhood.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the zone fleshes heliotherapy but it is not a kind of a Stilwell.; sent13 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the zone fleshes heliotherapy but it is not a Stilwell is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the effervescence does not flesh spinsterhood.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Pamlico fleshes coontie and is inarticulate.; int5 -> int6: the Pamlico fleshes coontie.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Rhabdoviridae is a terrier.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
that the curbstone is a stockist but it is not a Melospiza is wrong.
$hypothesis$ = the curbstone is a stockist and not a Melospiza. ; $context$ = sent1: the starflower does flesh spinsterhood. sent2: if the zone is not phonological that it does flesh heliotherapy and it does not flesh coontie is not right. sent3: the Pamlico is a Stilwell. sent4: the curbstone does flesh coontie but it is not a Melospiza. sent5: if the effervescence does not flesh spinsterhood the Pamlico does flesh coontie and is inarticulate. sent6: the Rhabdoviridae does flesh coontie and is not inarticulate if the fact that the Pamlico is a terrier hold. sent7: the Rhabdoviridae is a terrier if the Pamlico does flesh coontie. sent8: the curbstone is a kind of a stockist but it is not a Melospiza if the Rhabdoviridae is a terrier. sent9: the zone does flesh heliotherapy and is not a Stilwell if the effervescence fleshes spinsterhood. sent10: the fact that if the Pamlico is not the stockist the fact that the Pamlico does flesh heliotherapy and does flesh coontie does not hold is not false. sent11: the fact that the curbstone fleshes spinsterhood and is a stockist is wrong if it is not a kind of a Stilwell. sent12: the zone is not phonological. sent13: that the zone does flesh heliotherapy and is not a kind of a Stilwell does not hold if it is not phonological. sent14: the curbstone does not flesh spinsterhood. sent15: the Rhabdoviridae fleshes heliotherapy if that the zone is a terrier is right. sent16: the zone is a terrier but it is not a Stilwell if the Rhabdoviridae is phonological. sent17: the effervescence is a kind of a stockist. sent18: something is a kind of a terrier but it is not inarticulate. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the effervescence fleshes spinsterhood.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the zone fleshes heliotherapy but it is not a kind of a Stilwell.; sent13 & sent12 -> int2: the fact that the zone fleshes heliotherapy but it is not a Stilwell is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the effervescence does not flesh spinsterhood.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: the Pamlico fleshes coontie and is inarticulate.; int5 -> int6: the Pamlico fleshes coontie.; int6 & sent7 -> int7: the Rhabdoviridae is a terrier.; int7 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__