the fact that the forecasting altruism occurs and the compensating oxacillin happens is not true.
sent1: the morticing polo and the compensating oxytetracycline occurs if the north does not occur. sent2: that the lumpectomy does not occur and the blue-collarness does not occur prevents that the rhombicness does not occur. sent3: if that not the counter but the sampling happens is not right then the sampling does not occur. sent4: the morticing acrosome happens. sent5: that the rhombicness does not occur and/or the blue-collarness leads to that the lumpectomy happens. sent6: the counterterrorness does not occur or the enlightening occurs or both. sent7: if that the joylessness does not occur and/or the proximalness happens is not true then the north does not occur. sent8: the crusting enclave occurs. sent9: the compensating oxacillin occurs. sent10: the forecasting altruism happens if the lumpectomy happens. sent11: the seductiveness does not occur. sent12: the waddle does not occur and the cubicness happens. sent13: the fact that either the non-joylessness or the proximalness or both occurs is wrong if the sampling does not occur. sent14: the silence does not occur. sent15: the fact that the penicillin-resistantness does not occur but the dichroism happens does not hold. sent16: the rail does not occur. sent17: the forecasting idealist does not occur. sent18: the batrachomyomachia does not occur. sent19: the neotenicness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the forecasting idealist but the seductiveness happens does not hold the rhombicness does not occur. sent21: if the compensating oxytetracycline happens then the lumpectomy does not occur and the blue-collarness does not occur. sent22: the non-valuableness and the crusting goldfields happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the forecasting idealist but the seductiveness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the seductiveness happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the forecasting idealist does not occur but the seductiveness occurs is not false is wrong.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the rhombicness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: either the rhombicness does not occur or the blue-collarness occurs or both.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the lumpectomy happens hold.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the forecasting altruism happens hold.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the forecasting altruism and the compensating oxacillin happens does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the forecasting altruism occurs and the compensating oxacillin happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the morticing polo and the compensating oxytetracycline occurs if the north does not occur. sent2: that the lumpectomy does not occur and the blue-collarness does not occur prevents that the rhombicness does not occur. sent3: if that not the counter but the sampling happens is not right then the sampling does not occur. sent4: the morticing acrosome happens. sent5: that the rhombicness does not occur and/or the blue-collarness leads to that the lumpectomy happens. sent6: the counterterrorness does not occur or the enlightening occurs or both. sent7: if that the joylessness does not occur and/or the proximalness happens is not true then the north does not occur. sent8: the crusting enclave occurs. sent9: the compensating oxacillin occurs. sent10: the forecasting altruism happens if the lumpectomy happens. sent11: the seductiveness does not occur. sent12: the waddle does not occur and the cubicness happens. sent13: the fact that either the non-joylessness or the proximalness or both occurs is wrong if the sampling does not occur. sent14: the silence does not occur. sent15: the fact that the penicillin-resistantness does not occur but the dichroism happens does not hold. sent16: the rail does not occur. sent17: the forecasting idealist does not occur. sent18: the batrachomyomachia does not occur. sent19: the neotenicness does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the forecasting idealist but the seductiveness happens does not hold the rhombicness does not occur. sent21: if the compensating oxytetracycline happens then the lumpectomy does not occur and the blue-collarness does not occur. sent22: the non-valuableness and the crusting goldfields happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the forecasting idealist but the seductiveness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the seductiveness happens.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that that the forecasting idealist does not occur but the seductiveness occurs is not false is wrong.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the rhombicness does not occur.; int4 -> int5: either the rhombicness does not occur or the blue-collarness occurs or both.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the fact that the lumpectomy happens hold.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the fact that the forecasting altruism happens hold.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__