that the hypotonicity is a Mach is not wrong.
sent1: if something that does not prop Osteoglossidae does not wean Osteoglossidae then it is not a Mach. sent2: if something is not a kind of a crinoid it does not wean audit and it is cubist. sent3: the rapeseed does spectate hypotonicity. sent4: that if the fact that something does spectate hypotonicity and it is a sideline is not right it does not spectate hypotonicity is true. sent5: if the rapeseed does not wean Osteoglossidae and it does not prop Osteoglossidae then the Coigue does wean audit. sent6: if the Coigue does wean audit that it is a Mach hold. sent7: if something props Osteoglossidae then it is not a kind of a Mach and does not wean Osteoglossidae. sent8: that the theca does prop Osteoglossidae is not right. sent9: something does not spectate hypotonicity. sent10: if the Coigue is a Mach then the hypotonicity is not a Mach but it is cubist. sent11: if the rapeseed does wean Osteoglossidae it is not collapsible and it is not a cellar. sent12: the desalination does prop Osteoglossidae. sent13: the fact that the theca does spectate hypotonicity and is a kind of a sideline is not true if there is something such that the fact that it does not spectate hypotonicity hold. sent14: the rapeseed props Osteoglossidae if the Coigue does wean audit and is not a kind of a cubist. sent15: that the rapeseed is a kind of noncollapsible thing that is not a kind of a cellar is false if it does spectate hypotonicity. sent16: if that there is something such that that it is not a kind of a crinoid and/or it is not a uvula is not correct is not wrong the rapeseed does not prop Osteoglossidae. sent17: something does not wean Osteoglossidae if it does not wean audit and is cubist. sent18: the theca is not a uvula if it is not a tobacco. sent19: there is nothing such that it is not crinoid and/or is not a uvula. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is crinoid and/or not a uvula does not hold the rapeseed does not prop Osteoglossidae. sent21: if the fact that something is not a uvula and does not spectate hypotonicity is true it is not a crinoid. sent22: The hypotonicity does spectate rapeseed.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rapeseed weans Osteoglossidae.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the rapeseed is not collapsible and is not a cellar.; sent15 & sent3 -> int2: that the rapeseed is not collapsible and it is not a cellar is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the rapeseed does not wean Osteoglossidae.; sent19 -> int5: the fact that the ICBM is not a crinoid and/or is not a uvula does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that either it is not a kind of a crinoid or it is not a uvula or both does not hold.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the rapeseed does not prop Osteoglossidae.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the rapeseed does not wean Osteoglossidae and does not prop Osteoglossidae is true.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the Coigue weans audit.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the Coigue is a Mach.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the hypotonicity is not a Mach but it is not non-cubist.; int11 -> hypothesis;
that the hypotonicity is a Mach hold.
sent7 -> int12: the rapeseed is not a Mach and does not wean Osteoglossidae if it props Osteoglossidae.;
$hypothesis$ = that the hypotonicity is a Mach is not wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not prop Osteoglossidae does not wean Osteoglossidae then it is not a Mach. sent2: if something is not a kind of a crinoid it does not wean audit and it is cubist. sent3: the rapeseed does spectate hypotonicity. sent4: that if the fact that something does spectate hypotonicity and it is a sideline is not right it does not spectate hypotonicity is true. sent5: if the rapeseed does not wean Osteoglossidae and it does not prop Osteoglossidae then the Coigue does wean audit. sent6: if the Coigue does wean audit that it is a Mach hold. sent7: if something props Osteoglossidae then it is not a kind of a Mach and does not wean Osteoglossidae. sent8: that the theca does prop Osteoglossidae is not right. sent9: something does not spectate hypotonicity. sent10: if the Coigue is a Mach then the hypotonicity is not a Mach but it is cubist. sent11: if the rapeseed does wean Osteoglossidae it is not collapsible and it is not a cellar. sent12: the desalination does prop Osteoglossidae. sent13: the fact that the theca does spectate hypotonicity and is a kind of a sideline is not true if there is something such that the fact that it does not spectate hypotonicity hold. sent14: the rapeseed props Osteoglossidae if the Coigue does wean audit and is not a kind of a cubist. sent15: that the rapeseed is a kind of noncollapsible thing that is not a kind of a cellar is false if it does spectate hypotonicity. sent16: if that there is something such that that it is not a kind of a crinoid and/or it is not a uvula is not correct is not wrong the rapeseed does not prop Osteoglossidae. sent17: something does not wean Osteoglossidae if it does not wean audit and is cubist. sent18: the theca is not a uvula if it is not a tobacco. sent19: there is nothing such that it is not crinoid and/or is not a uvula. sent20: if there exists something such that that it is crinoid and/or not a uvula does not hold the rapeseed does not prop Osteoglossidae. sent21: if the fact that something is not a uvula and does not spectate hypotonicity is true it is not a crinoid. sent22: The hypotonicity does spectate rapeseed. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the rapeseed weans Osteoglossidae.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the rapeseed is not collapsible and is not a cellar.; sent15 & sent3 -> int2: that the rapeseed is not collapsible and it is not a cellar is not correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the rapeseed does not wean Osteoglossidae.; sent19 -> int5: the fact that the ICBM is not a crinoid and/or is not a uvula does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that either it is not a kind of a crinoid or it is not a uvula or both does not hold.; int6 & sent16 -> int7: the rapeseed does not prop Osteoglossidae.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the fact that the rapeseed does not wean Osteoglossidae and does not prop Osteoglossidae is true.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the Coigue weans audit.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the Coigue is a Mach.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the hypotonicity is not a Mach but it is not non-cubist.; int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__