the waxmallow is a Fijian.
sent1: that the fluorescent is non-chronic is not wrong. sent2: if the fluorescent is a writ then that the waxmallow is not a kind of a Fijian is true. sent3: the fluorescent is not incommodious if it is not a blacktail. sent4: the fact that the fluorescent circularizes stainability is true. sent5: if the Praetorian is not incommodious then the waxmallow is both a Fijian and eccentric. sent6: if that the fact that the fluorescent is a blacktail and it is a Anjou is not right is correct the fact that it is not incommodious is not wrong. sent7: if the fact that something refrains reincarnation and it does solve hold the Praetorian is not a Camptosorus. sent8: if the fact that the fluorescent is a kind of a Camptosorus and it is a blacktail is false it is non-Fijian. sent9: there exists something such that it does not refrain reincarnation. sent10: there is something such that it does not refrain reincarnation and does solve. sent11: if something does not refrain reincarnation and solves the Praetorian is not a kind of a Camptosorus. sent12: if the flintlock is not chronic and is not a kind of a writ then the Praetorian is not incommodious. sent13: if the fluorescent is a writ and/or an eccentric the waxmallow is not Fijian. sent14: everything is not chronic. sent15: if the Praetorian is not a Camptosorus then the fluorescent is not chronic. sent16: if something is not an eccentric then that it is both a blacktail and a Anjou does not hold. sent17: the fact that the Praetorian is a kind of scriptural thing that is cosmic does not hold. sent18: the fluorescent is not chronic and is incommodious if the Praetorian is not a Camptosorus.
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the fluorescent is a blacktail and it is a Anjou does not hold if it is not an eccentric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluorescent is not an eccentric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the fluorescent is a kind of a blacktail and it is a Anjou is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fluorescent is not incommodious.; sent10 & sent11 -> int4: the Praetorian is not a kind of a Camptosorus.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the fluorescent is both not chronic and incommodious.; int5 -> int6: the fluorescent is incommodious.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fluorescent is not non-eccentric.; int8 -> int9: either the fluorescent is a writ or it is an eccentric or both.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the waxmallow is a kind of a Fijian is not wrong.
sent14 -> int10: the Praetorian is not chronic.;
$hypothesis$ = the waxmallow is a Fijian. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fluorescent is non-chronic is not wrong. sent2: if the fluorescent is a writ then that the waxmallow is not a kind of a Fijian is true. sent3: the fluorescent is not incommodious if it is not a blacktail. sent4: the fact that the fluorescent circularizes stainability is true. sent5: if the Praetorian is not incommodious then the waxmallow is both a Fijian and eccentric. sent6: if that the fact that the fluorescent is a blacktail and it is a Anjou is not right is correct the fact that it is not incommodious is not wrong. sent7: if the fact that something refrains reincarnation and it does solve hold the Praetorian is not a Camptosorus. sent8: if the fact that the fluorescent is a kind of a Camptosorus and it is a blacktail is false it is non-Fijian. sent9: there exists something such that it does not refrain reincarnation. sent10: there is something such that it does not refrain reincarnation and does solve. sent11: if something does not refrain reincarnation and solves the Praetorian is not a kind of a Camptosorus. sent12: if the flintlock is not chronic and is not a kind of a writ then the Praetorian is not incommodious. sent13: if the fluorescent is a writ and/or an eccentric the waxmallow is not Fijian. sent14: everything is not chronic. sent15: if the Praetorian is not a Camptosorus then the fluorescent is not chronic. sent16: if something is not an eccentric then that it is both a blacktail and a Anjou does not hold. sent17: the fact that the Praetorian is a kind of scriptural thing that is cosmic does not hold. sent18: the fluorescent is not chronic and is incommodious if the Praetorian is not a Camptosorus. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: the fact that the fluorescent is a blacktail and it is a Anjou does not hold if it is not an eccentric.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fluorescent is not an eccentric.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the fact that the fluorescent is a kind of a blacktail and it is a Anjou is not true.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fluorescent is not incommodious.; sent10 & sent11 -> int4: the Praetorian is not a kind of a Camptosorus.; sent18 & int4 -> int5: the fluorescent is both not chronic and incommodious.; int5 -> int6: the fluorescent is incommodious.; int3 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the fluorescent is not non-eccentric.; int8 -> int9: either the fluorescent is a writ or it is an eccentric or both.; int9 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__