the fact that something is not a kind of a noradrenaline and is not a typicality does not hold.
sent1: if the biosynthesis is not Himalayan but it is armless then the escapologist is not a kind of a trier. sent2: the barrio is a kind of a storeroom that is not a kind of a cavy if the pabulum is a balaclava. sent3: the barrio is not a kind of a noradrenaline. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Leporidae and it is not a noradrenaline is not true. sent5: the polypropylene syllogizes hand-me-down if the fact that it does not syllogizes hand-me-down and it is sacrificial is not true. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a noradrenaline. sent7: the biosynthesis is not a kind of a trier if there is something such that it is a kind of a typicality. sent8: the barrio is not a typicality if it is not a kind of a Leporidae. sent9: that something does not remonstrate Ufa and does not theme streptocarpus is not correct if it does syllogize hand-me-down. sent10: the fact that the biosynthesis is a trier but it is not armless does not hold. sent11: something does not measure daughter-in-law but it is a noradrenaline if it is a kind of a archdeaconry. sent12: if there is something such that it is not a Leporidae or is not a trier or both then the frame is not a trier. sent13: if the biosynthesis is not Himalayan and it is not armless then the escapologist is not a kind of a trier. sent14: the escapologist is a trier and it measures daughter-in-law. sent15: if the barrio does not measure daughter-in-law and is a noradrenaline then the escapologist is a typicality. sent16: if the fact that the polypropylene does not remonstrate Ufa and does not theme streptocarpus is not true then the pabulum is a balaclava. sent17: if something is a storeroom but it is not a cavy then it is a kind of a archdeaconry. sent18: there is something such that it is not Himalayan and it is not armless. sent19: the barrio is not a Leporidae if there is something such that that it is not Himalayan and is not armless is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biosynthesis is not Himalayan and it is not armless.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the escapologist is not a kind of a trier.; sent14 -> int2: the fact that the escapologist is a kind of a trier is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the biosynthesis is non-Himalayan and it is not armless is not true hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not Himalayan and it is not armless is not right.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the barrio is not a Leporidae is not false.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the barrio is not a kind of a typicality.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the barrio is both not a noradrenaline and not a typicality.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the frame is not a trier.
sent11 -> int9: if the barrio is a archdeaconry it does not measure daughter-in-law and it is a kind of a noradrenaline.; sent17 -> int10: if the barrio is a storeroom but it is not a kind of a cavy it is a archdeaconry.; sent9 -> int11: if the polypropylene does syllogize hand-me-down then the fact that it does not remonstrate Ufa and does not theme streptocarpus does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that something is not a kind of a noradrenaline and is not a typicality does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the biosynthesis is not Himalayan but it is armless then the escapologist is not a kind of a trier. sent2: the barrio is a kind of a storeroom that is not a kind of a cavy if the pabulum is a balaclava. sent3: the barrio is not a kind of a noradrenaline. sent4: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Leporidae and it is not a noradrenaline is not true. sent5: the polypropylene syllogizes hand-me-down if the fact that it does not syllogizes hand-me-down and it is sacrificial is not true. sent6: there is something such that it is not a kind of a noradrenaline. sent7: the biosynthesis is not a kind of a trier if there is something such that it is a kind of a typicality. sent8: the barrio is not a typicality if it is not a kind of a Leporidae. sent9: that something does not remonstrate Ufa and does not theme streptocarpus is not correct if it does syllogize hand-me-down. sent10: the fact that the biosynthesis is a trier but it is not armless does not hold. sent11: something does not measure daughter-in-law but it is a noradrenaline if it is a kind of a archdeaconry. sent12: if there is something such that it is not a Leporidae or is not a trier or both then the frame is not a trier. sent13: if the biosynthesis is not Himalayan and it is not armless then the escapologist is not a kind of a trier. sent14: the escapologist is a trier and it measures daughter-in-law. sent15: if the barrio does not measure daughter-in-law and is a noradrenaline then the escapologist is a typicality. sent16: if the fact that the polypropylene does not remonstrate Ufa and does not theme streptocarpus is not true then the pabulum is a balaclava. sent17: if something is a storeroom but it is not a cavy then it is a kind of a archdeaconry. sent18: there is something such that it is not Himalayan and it is not armless. sent19: the barrio is not a Leporidae if there is something such that that it is not Himalayan and is not armless is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the biosynthesis is not Himalayan and it is not armless.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the escapologist is not a kind of a trier.; sent14 -> int2: the fact that the escapologist is a kind of a trier is right.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the fact that the biosynthesis is non-Himalayan and it is not armless is not true hold.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that that it is not Himalayan and it is not armless is not right.; int5 & sent19 -> int6: that the barrio is not a Leporidae is not false.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the barrio is not a kind of a typicality.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the barrio is both not a noradrenaline and not a typicality.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__