the fact that the vinyl is a Ecuadorian and it is a kind of a haycock is wrong.
sent1: if the fact that something does cream and it is a radio-phonograph is not right it does not cream. sent2: if the ballast is not aquicultural that it drones Ignatius and it is not front does not hold. sent3: that the ballast does not drone Ignatius but it is front is wrong. sent4: if something does not cream the fact that it is not a Chateaubriand and does not contribute Spain is not true. sent5: something does drone Ignatius if it is not a Chateaubriand. sent6: that something is a Ecuadorian and it is a haycock is wrong if it is not enolic. sent7: the propagator is aquicultural. sent8: that the flatiron is not non-enolic is true if it is not a Chateaubriand. sent9: that the vinyl is not a kind of a haycock but it is reverent is not true. sent10: the vinyl is not enolic if the propagator is a borderland and it is a radio-phonograph. sent11: the fact that the ballast does not drone Ignatius and it is not a front is not correct if it is not aquicultural. sent12: the propagator is enolic. sent13: if the flatiron is a haycock and it is enolic then the vinyl is non-antemortem. sent14: the fact that the propagator is not a Ecuadorian and it is not a borderland does not hold. sent15: if the ballast is not aquicultural the fact that it does not drone Ignatius and fronts does not hold. sent16: something is a Chateaubriand if it does not cream. sent17: the fact that the vinyl is non-aquicultural but it is a haycock is not right. sent18: the flatiron does not cream if the fact that it is not reverent and it is antemortem is not correct. sent19: the flatiron is enolic if the vinyl is antemortem. sent20: if the flatiron is a kind of a cream the vinyl is both a haycock and not a Chateaubriand. sent21: if the fact that that the ballast does not drone Ignatius and is non-front is wrong is not false the propagator is a radio-phonograph. sent22: the propagator is a borderland if the flatiron is a Chateaubriand. sent23: the fact that the ballast drones Ignatius but it is not a kind of a front does not hold. sent24: if the fact that the flatiron is not a radio-phonograph is not false then it is a Chateaubriand. sent25: the fact that the flatiron is not reverent and is antemortem is incorrect. sent26: the flatiron is not a cream if it is not antemortem. sent27: the ballast is not aquicultural. sent28: that the vinyl is a kind of a Ecuadorian hold if the fact that it is not a radio-phonograph is not wrong.
sent18 & sent25 -> int1: that the flatiron is not a kind of a cream hold.; sent16 -> int2: if the flatiron is not a cream then it is a kind of a Chateaubriand.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flatiron is a Chateaubriand.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the propagator is a borderland.; sent11 & sent27 -> int5: the fact that the ballast does not drone Ignatius and it is non-front is not true.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the propagator is a kind of a radio-phonograph.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the propagator is a kind of a borderland that is a radio-phonograph.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the vinyl is not enolic.; sent6 -> int9: if the vinyl is not enolic then the fact that it is a Ecuadorian and is a haycock does not hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the vinyl is a Ecuadorian and it is a haycock.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the vinyl is a Ecuadorian and it is a kind of a haycock is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something does cream and it is a radio-phonograph is not right it does not cream. sent2: if the ballast is not aquicultural that it drones Ignatius and it is not front does not hold. sent3: that the ballast does not drone Ignatius but it is front is wrong. sent4: if something does not cream the fact that it is not a Chateaubriand and does not contribute Spain is not true. sent5: something does drone Ignatius if it is not a Chateaubriand. sent6: that something is a Ecuadorian and it is a haycock is wrong if it is not enolic. sent7: the propagator is aquicultural. sent8: that the flatiron is not non-enolic is true if it is not a Chateaubriand. sent9: that the vinyl is not a kind of a haycock but it is reverent is not true. sent10: the vinyl is not enolic if the propagator is a borderland and it is a radio-phonograph. sent11: the fact that the ballast does not drone Ignatius and it is not a front is not correct if it is not aquicultural. sent12: the propagator is enolic. sent13: if the flatiron is a haycock and it is enolic then the vinyl is non-antemortem. sent14: the fact that the propagator is not a Ecuadorian and it is not a borderland does not hold. sent15: if the ballast is not aquicultural the fact that it does not drone Ignatius and fronts does not hold. sent16: something is a Chateaubriand if it does not cream. sent17: the fact that the vinyl is non-aquicultural but it is a haycock is not right. sent18: the flatiron does not cream if the fact that it is not reverent and it is antemortem is not correct. sent19: the flatiron is enolic if the vinyl is antemortem. sent20: if the flatiron is a kind of a cream the vinyl is both a haycock and not a Chateaubriand. sent21: if the fact that that the ballast does not drone Ignatius and is non-front is wrong is not false the propagator is a radio-phonograph. sent22: the propagator is a borderland if the flatiron is a Chateaubriand. sent23: the fact that the ballast drones Ignatius but it is not a kind of a front does not hold. sent24: if the fact that the flatiron is not a radio-phonograph is not false then it is a Chateaubriand. sent25: the fact that the flatiron is not reverent and is antemortem is incorrect. sent26: the flatiron is not a cream if it is not antemortem. sent27: the ballast is not aquicultural. sent28: that the vinyl is a kind of a Ecuadorian hold if the fact that it is not a radio-phonograph is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent25 -> int1: that the flatiron is not a kind of a cream hold.; sent16 -> int2: if the flatiron is not a cream then it is a kind of a Chateaubriand.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the flatiron is a Chateaubriand.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the propagator is a borderland.; sent11 & sent27 -> int5: the fact that the ballast does not drone Ignatius and it is non-front is not true.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the propagator is a kind of a radio-phonograph.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the propagator is a kind of a borderland that is a radio-phonograph.; int7 & sent10 -> int8: the vinyl is not enolic.; sent6 -> int9: if the vinyl is not enolic then the fact that it is a Ecuadorian and is a haycock does not hold.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__