the efferentness occurs.
sent1: if both the colorsness and the non-sadomasochisticness occurs then the reporting Hassel happens. sent2: that the non-colorsness and the non-sadomasochisticness occurs triggers that the reporting Hassel occurs. sent3: if either the design occurs or the destructing occurs or both the easternness does not occur. sent4: the negotiating mural happens and/or the easternness happens. sent5: that both the non-colorsness and the sadomasochisticness occurs leads to the reporting Hassel. sent6: the reporting throughput does not occur and the portfolio does not occur. sent7: if the negotiating mural occurs then the designing occurs. sent8: the efferentness does not occur if both the reporting Hassel and the destructing occurs. sent9: that the sadomasochisticness occurs hold if the surprising happens. sent10: both the non-colorsness and the non-sadomasochisticness happens. sent11: the surprise happens and the survey happens if the algometricness does not occur. sent12: the coloring but not the reporting Hassel occurs if the sadomasochisticness happens. sent13: the reporting actinometer occurs. sent14: the designing occurs and/or the destructing happens if the reporting Hassel does not occur. sent15: either the cranialness happens or the reporting stalk occurs or both. sent16: either the Nicaeanness occurs or the spread occurs or both. sent17: that the design happens leads to that the destructing happens. sent18: the design happens if the easternness occurs.
sent4 & sent7 & sent18 -> int1: the designing happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the destructing happens.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the reporting Hassel occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that both the reporting Hassel and the destructing occurs is true.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the efferentness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the efferentness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the colorsness and the non-sadomasochisticness occurs then the reporting Hassel happens. sent2: that the non-colorsness and the non-sadomasochisticness occurs triggers that the reporting Hassel occurs. sent3: if either the design occurs or the destructing occurs or both the easternness does not occur. sent4: the negotiating mural happens and/or the easternness happens. sent5: that both the non-colorsness and the sadomasochisticness occurs leads to the reporting Hassel. sent6: the reporting throughput does not occur and the portfolio does not occur. sent7: if the negotiating mural occurs then the designing occurs. sent8: the efferentness does not occur if both the reporting Hassel and the destructing occurs. sent9: that the sadomasochisticness occurs hold if the surprising happens. sent10: both the non-colorsness and the non-sadomasochisticness happens. sent11: the surprise happens and the survey happens if the algometricness does not occur. sent12: the coloring but not the reporting Hassel occurs if the sadomasochisticness happens. sent13: the reporting actinometer occurs. sent14: the designing occurs and/or the destructing happens if the reporting Hassel does not occur. sent15: either the cranialness happens or the reporting stalk occurs or both. sent16: either the Nicaeanness occurs or the spread occurs or both. sent17: that the design happens leads to that the destructing happens. sent18: the design happens if the easternness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent7 & sent18 -> int1: the designing happens.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the destructing happens.; sent2 & sent10 -> int3: the reporting Hassel occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: that both the reporting Hassel and the destructing occurs is true.; int4 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__