the cloakroom is not a Salmo.
sent1: there is something such that it does beckon Cracow and it does deny miner. sent2: if something is a Calvinist it is not a rhodonite. sent3: the snoop is a kind of a claret if the cornea denies Bush. sent4: the cloakroom is a Salmo if there exists something such that it is a rhodonite and it does not beckon permanence. sent5: something that is not polymorphemic is a kind of a rhodonite. sent6: the milord is a obstruent but it does not beckon permanence. sent7: if the cornea either does deny Bush or is a rhodonite or both then it is not Calvinist. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it gesticulates quintal and it beckons determination is right is incorrect the snoop does not beckon permanence. sent9: the cornea denies Bush if it is not a Calvinist. sent10: something is not polymorphemic if it clarets and/or it is a mixology. sent11: the snoop is not polymorphemic if it is a mixology. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a rhodonite that beckons permanence hold. sent13: if there exists something such that it does not beckon determination then the snoop does not beckon permanence. sent14: the cornea is a coagulase. sent15: the cornea is not a kind of a Calvinist. sent16: that something is a rhodonite is not wrong. sent17: that the swathe does gesticulate quintal and does beckon determination is incorrect.
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the cornea denies Bush.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the snoop is a claret.; int2 -> int3: the snoop is a claret or it is a mixology or both.; sent10 -> int4: if either the snoop is a claret or it is a mixology or both it is not polymorphemic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the snoop is not polymorphemic hold.; sent5 -> int6: if the snoop is not polymorphemic it is a kind of a rhodonite.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the snoop is a rhodonite.; sent17 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it gesticulates quintal and beckons determination does not hold.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the snoop does not beckon permanence.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the snoop is a kind of a rhodonite that does not beckon permanence.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a rhodonite and it does not beckon permanence.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the cloakroom is not a Salmo. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does beckon Cracow and it does deny miner. sent2: if something is a Calvinist it is not a rhodonite. sent3: the snoop is a kind of a claret if the cornea denies Bush. sent4: the cloakroom is a Salmo if there exists something such that it is a rhodonite and it does not beckon permanence. sent5: something that is not polymorphemic is a kind of a rhodonite. sent6: the milord is a obstruent but it does not beckon permanence. sent7: if the cornea either does deny Bush or is a rhodonite or both then it is not Calvinist. sent8: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it gesticulates quintal and it beckons determination is right is incorrect the snoop does not beckon permanence. sent9: the cornea denies Bush if it is not a Calvinist. sent10: something is not polymorphemic if it clarets and/or it is a mixology. sent11: the snoop is not polymorphemic if it is a mixology. sent12: there exists something such that the fact that it is a rhodonite that beckons permanence hold. sent13: if there exists something such that it does not beckon determination then the snoop does not beckon permanence. sent14: the cornea is a coagulase. sent15: the cornea is not a kind of a Calvinist. sent16: that something is a rhodonite is not wrong. sent17: that the swathe does gesticulate quintal and does beckon determination is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent15 -> int1: the cornea denies Bush.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the snoop is a claret.; int2 -> int3: the snoop is a claret or it is a mixology or both.; sent10 -> int4: if either the snoop is a claret or it is a mixology or both it is not polymorphemic.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the snoop is not polymorphemic hold.; sent5 -> int6: if the snoop is not polymorphemic it is a kind of a rhodonite.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the snoop is a rhodonite.; sent17 -> int8: there exists something such that the fact that it gesticulates quintal and beckons determination does not hold.; int8 & sent8 -> int9: the snoop does not beckon permanence.; int7 & int9 -> int10: the snoop is a kind of a rhodonite that does not beckon permanence.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is a rhodonite and it does not beckon permanence.; int11 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__