the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Crane the fact that either it is a nucleus or it is not aecial or both is incorrect does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if it jams tesla then it is a Bassariscus or is not a Physeteridae or both. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a Crane hold it is not a kind of a nucleus. sent3: that the bombsight is a kind of a nucleus and/or it is not aecial is not right if it is a Crane. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a packrat then the fact that it is clayey and/or it does not jam pacesetter is not correct. sent5: the fact that either the bombsight is a nucleus or it is aecial or both is wrong if it is a Crane. sent6: the bombsight is not a nucleus if it is a Crane. sent7: if something spills then that either it promises chortle or it is not a Crane or both is false. sent8: if the bombsight is a kind of an excavator the fact that it either does blanket Yay or is not a upbraider or both does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it acquaints then it does not jam tesla. sent10: there is something such that if it is intertidal then it is a kind of a technique and/or it is not an elan. sent11: if the bombsight is a Crane that it is either not immediate or not impolite or both is not correct.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bombsight either does promise chortle or is not a Crane or both does not hold if it is a kind of a spill.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is a Crane the fact that either it is a nucleus or it is not aecial or both is incorrect does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if it jams tesla then it is a Bassariscus or is not a Physeteridae or both. sent2: there exists something such that if that it is a Crane hold it is not a kind of a nucleus. sent3: that the bombsight is a kind of a nucleus and/or it is not aecial is not right if it is a Crane. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a packrat then the fact that it is clayey and/or it does not jam pacesetter is not correct. sent5: the fact that either the bombsight is a nucleus or it is aecial or both is wrong if it is a Crane. sent6: the bombsight is not a nucleus if it is a Crane. sent7: if something spills then that either it promises chortle or it is not a Crane or both is false. sent8: if the bombsight is a kind of an excavator the fact that it either does blanket Yay or is not a upbraider or both does not hold. sent9: there is something such that if it acquaints then it does not jam tesla. sent10: there is something such that if it is intertidal then it is a kind of a technique and/or it is not an elan. sent11: if the bombsight is a Crane that it is either not immediate or not impolite or both is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__