the miniskirt is a Czech.
sent1: the length is a exponentiation if there is something such that that it is a bump and it is not irrelevant is not correct. sent2: if the antioxidant weans occasions then the miniskirt is not non-Czech. sent3: the miniskirt thromboses Irishwoman. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it bumps and it is not irrelevant is incorrect is correct. sent5: that something is a kind of a recidivist hold if the fact that it does not thrombose Irishwoman and is not a exponentiation does not hold. sent6: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Tertiary then the cue thromboses Irishwoman and it is a exponentiation. sent7: the antioxidant weans occasions if the fact that the chop is sepulchral is correct. sent8: the cue is a Tertiary and a phycoerythrin if there is something such that that it is a kind of a fixture is true. sent9: that the fact that the flier does thrombose Irishwoman but it is not a exponentiation is correct is not true if the length is a exponentiation. sent10: the fact that the flier does not thrombose Irishwoman and it is not a exponentiation does not hold if the length is a exponentiation. sent11: the bugbane does wean Goldman and is a fixture. sent12: if something is a kind of a blacksmith and is a Tertiary the chop is sepulchral.
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the length is a exponentiation.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the flier does not thrombose Irishwoman and it is not a kind of a exponentiation does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the flier does not thrombose Irishwoman and is not a kind of a exponentiation is not true then it is a kind of a recidivist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the flier is a recidivist.; sent11 -> int5: the bugbane is a fixture.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a fixture.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the cue is a Tertiary and is a phycoerythrin.; int7 -> int8: the cue is a kind of a Tertiary.;
$hypothesis$ = the miniskirt is a Czech. ; $context$ = sent1: the length is a exponentiation if there is something such that that it is a bump and it is not irrelevant is not correct. sent2: if the antioxidant weans occasions then the miniskirt is not non-Czech. sent3: the miniskirt thromboses Irishwoman. sent4: the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it bumps and it is not irrelevant is incorrect is correct. sent5: that something is a kind of a recidivist hold if the fact that it does not thrombose Irishwoman and is not a exponentiation does not hold. sent6: if there is something such that it is a kind of a Tertiary then the cue thromboses Irishwoman and it is a exponentiation. sent7: the antioxidant weans occasions if the fact that the chop is sepulchral is correct. sent8: the cue is a Tertiary and a phycoerythrin if there is something such that that it is a kind of a fixture is true. sent9: that the fact that the flier does thrombose Irishwoman but it is not a exponentiation is correct is not true if the length is a exponentiation. sent10: the fact that the flier does not thrombose Irishwoman and it is not a exponentiation does not hold if the length is a exponentiation. sent11: the bugbane does wean Goldman and is a fixture. sent12: if something is a kind of a blacksmith and is a Tertiary the chop is sepulchral. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent1 -> int1: the length is a exponentiation.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: that the flier does not thrombose Irishwoman and it is not a kind of a exponentiation does not hold.; sent5 -> int3: if the fact that the flier does not thrombose Irishwoman and is not a kind of a exponentiation is not true then it is a kind of a recidivist.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the flier is a recidivist.; sent11 -> int5: the bugbane is a fixture.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that it is a fixture.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the cue is a Tertiary and is a phycoerythrin.; int7 -> int8: the cue is a kind of a Tertiary.; __UNKNOWN__