the leatherleaf does not outwear.
sent1: the fact that the leatherleaf is a kind of a Rigel and it is a kind of an argosy does not hold. sent2: if the fact that something is a Rigel but it is not a kind of an argosy is not right it does not outwear. sent3: the fact that the Hell is an argosy and does knead is not right if the dibble is not a kind of a Rigel. sent4: that something does not knead if that it is an argosy and it does knead is false hold. sent5: that the dibble is a Muller and it does coach outfitted is wrong if the fact that the Hell is non-forceless hold. sent6: if the Hell does not knead the leatherleaf outwears and it is forceless. sent7: something is not hypothermic if it is not a kind of an abolitionist. sent8: the starflower is not an argosy. sent9: if the Hell does knead and/or is forceless then the barnyard is not an argosy. sent10: if the Hell does outwear and does not knead the fact that the canister does not knead hold. sent11: something does not outwear if the fact that it is a kind of an argosy is not false. sent12: that the leatherleaf is a kind of a Rigel but it is not an argosy is incorrect if that the barnyard is not an argosy is correct. sent13: the dibble is not a Muller but it does coach outfitted. sent14: if something is traumatic the fact that it does coach transparency and is not a kind of a Rigel is not true. sent15: the barnyard is not an argosy if the Hell kneads. sent16: if that something is a Muller but it does not outwear is not true it is not a kind of an argosy. sent17: if that the barnyard does coach transparency but it is not a Rigel does not hold the dibble is not a kind of a Rigel.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hell is not forceless.; sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the leatherleaf is both a Rigel and not an argosy does not hold it does not outwear.;
the leatherleaf outwears.
sent4 -> int2: if the fact that the Hell is an argosy and does knead is not correct that it knead is wrong.; sent14 -> int3: the fact that the barnyard does coach transparency but it is not a kind of a Rigel does not hold if the fact that it is traumatic is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the leatherleaf does not outwear. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the leatherleaf is a kind of a Rigel and it is a kind of an argosy does not hold. sent2: if the fact that something is a Rigel but it is not a kind of an argosy is not right it does not outwear. sent3: the fact that the Hell is an argosy and does knead is not right if the dibble is not a kind of a Rigel. sent4: that something does not knead if that it is an argosy and it does knead is false hold. sent5: that the dibble is a Muller and it does coach outfitted is wrong if the fact that the Hell is non-forceless hold. sent6: if the Hell does not knead the leatherleaf outwears and it is forceless. sent7: something is not hypothermic if it is not a kind of an abolitionist. sent8: the starflower is not an argosy. sent9: if the Hell does knead and/or is forceless then the barnyard is not an argosy. sent10: if the Hell does outwear and does not knead the fact that the canister does not knead hold. sent11: something does not outwear if the fact that it is a kind of an argosy is not false. sent12: that the leatherleaf is a kind of a Rigel but it is not an argosy is incorrect if that the barnyard is not an argosy is correct. sent13: the dibble is not a Muller but it does coach outfitted. sent14: if something is traumatic the fact that it does coach transparency and is not a kind of a Rigel is not true. sent15: the barnyard is not an argosy if the Hell kneads. sent16: if that something is a Muller but it does not outwear is not true it is not a kind of an argosy. sent17: if that the barnyard does coach transparency but it is not a Rigel does not hold the dibble is not a kind of a Rigel. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hell is not forceless.; sent2 -> int1: if the fact that the leatherleaf is both a Rigel and not an argosy does not hold it does not outwear.; __UNKNOWN__