the Valentine expires fohn.
sent1: the cosmography does collogue Buphthalmum if the sketchbook expires mango. sent2: the Valentine is a morsel if the cosmography does collogue Buphthalmum. sent3: something expires fohn if it is a cocotte. sent4: if something expires verisimilitude it is amoristic. sent5: the Valentine storms. sent6: the Silex is anoxemic. sent7: the sketchbook does collogue Carcharhinus and is anoxemic if that the vicegerent is not a cocotte is not incorrect. sent8: the sketchbook collogues Carcharhinus. sent9: the fact that the vicegerent is a cocotte is true if it is anoxemic. sent10: the sketchbook is Britannic. sent11: that the sketchbook expires fohn is correct. sent12: the vicegerent is not a cocotte. sent13: something does expire mango if it is anoxemic. sent14: the vicegerent does collogue Buphthalmum. sent15: something does expire fohn if it is a morsel. sent16: the cosmography does expire fohn if the Valentine is a morsel.
sent7 & sent12 -> int1: the sketchbook collogues Carcharhinus and is not non-anoxemic.; int1 -> int2: the sketchbook is anoxemic.; sent13 -> int3: the sketchbook does expire mango if it is anoxemic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sketchbook expires mango.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the cosmography collogues Buphthalmum.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the Valentine is a morsel.; sent15 -> int7: the fact that the Valentine does expire fohn is right if it is a kind of a morsel.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
if the mango expires verisimilitude it is amoristic.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Valentine expires fohn. ; $context$ = sent1: the cosmography does collogue Buphthalmum if the sketchbook expires mango. sent2: the Valentine is a morsel if the cosmography does collogue Buphthalmum. sent3: something expires fohn if it is a cocotte. sent4: if something expires verisimilitude it is amoristic. sent5: the Valentine storms. sent6: the Silex is anoxemic. sent7: the sketchbook does collogue Carcharhinus and is anoxemic if that the vicegerent is not a cocotte is not incorrect. sent8: the sketchbook collogues Carcharhinus. sent9: the fact that the vicegerent is a cocotte is true if it is anoxemic. sent10: the sketchbook is Britannic. sent11: that the sketchbook expires fohn is correct. sent12: the vicegerent is not a cocotte. sent13: something does expire mango if it is anoxemic. sent14: the vicegerent does collogue Buphthalmum. sent15: something does expire fohn if it is a morsel. sent16: the cosmography does expire fohn if the Valentine is a morsel. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent12 -> int1: the sketchbook collogues Carcharhinus and is not non-anoxemic.; int1 -> int2: the sketchbook is anoxemic.; sent13 -> int3: the sketchbook does expire mango if it is anoxemic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the sketchbook expires mango.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the cosmography collogues Buphthalmum.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the Valentine is a morsel.; sent15 -> int7: the fact that the Valentine does expire fohn is right if it is a kind of a morsel.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__