there is something such that if it does bate it is both not a roots and a bag.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is abyssal it is not a kind of a Schumpeter. sent2: if the elaphure roots then it is not a northeaster and it is clement. sent3: something is not a kind of a roots but it is a kind of a bag if it does bate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is forte then it is non-Muscovite thing that gleams. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not bate is not right then it is a kind of a bag. sent6: if the elaphure bates then it does not root. sent7: there exists something such that if it bates then it does not root. sent8: there is something such that if it does personify abocclusion then it interlocks elaphure and it is appendicular.
sent3 -> int1: the elaphure is both not a roots and a bag if it does bate.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it does bate it is both not a roots and a bag. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is abyssal it is not a kind of a Schumpeter. sent2: if the elaphure roots then it is not a northeaster and it is clement. sent3: something is not a kind of a roots but it is a kind of a bag if it does bate. sent4: there exists something such that if it is forte then it is non-Muscovite thing that gleams. sent5: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not bate is not right then it is a kind of a bag. sent6: if the elaphure bates then it does not root. sent7: there exists something such that if it bates then it does not root. sent8: there is something such that if it does personify abocclusion then it interlocks elaphure and it is appendicular. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the elaphure is both not a roots and a bag if it does bate.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__