the scuffle is a carpentry.
sent1: that something is not merciful but it does nobble is correct if it is not holy. sent2: the fact that the fact that the namesake is both a tithe and passable does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a arthrogram hold. sent3: that something is not a unlikeness but it is numerological is not true if it is not merciful. sent4: the scuffle is not a carpentry if the corker is numerological. sent5: if something that does rationalize choc-ice is not glottal then it is not holy. sent6: the corker does not nobble. sent7: the chipotle is a unicorn that is not spectroscopic. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of invariable thing that is not a flashing does not hold if it is not a trembles. sent9: something is not archangelic and is Galwegian if the fact that it does not neglect nasal hold. sent10: the scuffle is a carpentry if the barouche is not merciful but it nobbles. sent11: something rationalizes choc-ice and is not glottal if it is Galwegian. sent12: the fact that something is not merciful and is not a carpentry is not right if it is not numerological. sent13: the groundwork is not a benedictine but it is shallow-draft if the axolotl is not a unicorn. sent14: if something is not a tithe then the fact that the secessionist is a trembles and it is marital is false. sent15: if the chipotle is a unicorn and is not spectroscopic then that the axolotl is not a kind of a unicorn is not incorrect. sent16: if that the namesake does tithe and is passable is not correct then the naboom does not tithe. sent17: if something does not nobble that it is not a unlikeness and it is not non-numerological is not right. sent18: that the corker is not a unlikeness and is numerological does not hold if it is not merciful. sent19: if the fact that the corker is not a unlikeness and it is not numerological is not correct then the scuffle is not a kind of a carpentry. sent20: the corker is a kind of non-merciful thing that does not nobble. sent21: the cheapjack is not a arthrogram if something that is not a benedictine is shallow-draft. sent22: that something is both not a unlikeness and not numerological is not right if it is not merciful. sent23: if there exists something such that that it trembles and it is marital is wrong the mend does not trembles.
sent22 -> int1: the fact that the corker is not a kind of a unlikeness and it is not numerological is not true if it is not merciful.; sent20 -> int2: the corker is not merciful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the corker is both not a unlikeness and not numerological does not hold.; int3 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
the scuffle is a carpentry.
sent1 -> int4: if the barouche is not holy it is not merciful and it does nobble.; sent5 -> int5: if the barouche does rationalize choc-ice and is not glottal it is not holy.; sent11 -> int6: the barouche rationalizes choc-ice and is not glottal if that it is Galwegian hold.; sent9 -> int7: if the barouche does not neglect nasal it is not archangelic and it is Galwegian.; sent8 -> int8: if the mend is not a trembles then the fact that it is invariable and does not flash is false.; sent15 & sent7 -> int9: the axolotl is not a unicorn.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: the groundwork is both not a benedictine and shallow-draft.; int10 -> int11: something is not a benedictine but it is shallow-draft.; int11 & sent21 -> int12: the fact that the cheapjack is not a arthrogram is correct.; int12 -> int13: something is not a arthrogram.; int13 & sent2 -> int14: that the namesake is a tithe and it is passable is wrong.; sent16 & int14 -> int15: the naboom does not tithe.; int15 -> int16: something does not tithe.; int16 & sent14 -> int17: that the secessionist does tremble and is marital is wrong.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that the fact that it is a trembles and is marital does not hold.; int18 & sent23 -> int19: the mend does not tremble.; int8 & int19 -> int20: the fact that the mend is not variable but it is not a kind of a flashing is not true.; int20 -> int21: there exists something such that the fact that it is both invariable and not a flashing is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the scuffle is a carpentry. ; $context$ = sent1: that something is not merciful but it does nobble is correct if it is not holy. sent2: the fact that the fact that the namesake is both a tithe and passable does not hold if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a arthrogram hold. sent3: that something is not a unlikeness but it is numerological is not true if it is not merciful. sent4: the scuffle is not a carpentry if the corker is numerological. sent5: if something that does rationalize choc-ice is not glottal then it is not holy. sent6: the corker does not nobble. sent7: the chipotle is a unicorn that is not spectroscopic. sent8: the fact that something is a kind of invariable thing that is not a flashing does not hold if it is not a trembles. sent9: something is not archangelic and is Galwegian if the fact that it does not neglect nasal hold. sent10: the scuffle is a carpentry if the barouche is not merciful but it nobbles. sent11: something rationalizes choc-ice and is not glottal if it is Galwegian. sent12: the fact that something is not merciful and is not a carpentry is not right if it is not numerological. sent13: the groundwork is not a benedictine but it is shallow-draft if the axolotl is not a unicorn. sent14: if something is not a tithe then the fact that the secessionist is a trembles and it is marital is false. sent15: if the chipotle is a unicorn and is not spectroscopic then that the axolotl is not a kind of a unicorn is not incorrect. sent16: if that the namesake does tithe and is passable is not correct then the naboom does not tithe. sent17: if something does not nobble that it is not a unlikeness and it is not non-numerological is not right. sent18: that the corker is not a unlikeness and is numerological does not hold if it is not merciful. sent19: if the fact that the corker is not a unlikeness and it is not numerological is not correct then the scuffle is not a kind of a carpentry. sent20: the corker is a kind of non-merciful thing that does not nobble. sent21: the cheapjack is not a arthrogram if something that is not a benedictine is shallow-draft. sent22: that something is both not a unlikeness and not numerological is not right if it is not merciful. sent23: if there exists something such that that it trembles and it is marital is wrong the mend does not trembles. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 -> int1: the fact that the corker is not a kind of a unlikeness and it is not numerological is not true if it is not merciful.; sent20 -> int2: the corker is not merciful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the corker is both not a unlikeness and not numerological does not hold.; int3 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__