that there is something such that if it does not hunger malfunctioning and it is not a kind of an objective then it does not construct phasianid does not hold.
sent1: if the nosewheel does hunger malfunctioning but it is non-objective the fact that it does not construct phasianid is not false. sent2: the knobkerrie is majuscule if it is not agrobiologic and is non-bicameral. sent3: if the nosewheel does not hunger malfunctioning and it is not an objective then it constructs phasianid. sent4: the fact that the phasianid is not objective is correct if it is not a kind of an esplanade and is not effortless. sent5: if something that is not a kind of a gerontologist is not a Toltec then it is not a Sacco. sent6: there exists something such that if it is both not a predicate and not a brush-off it is not a Hussite. sent7: the nosewheel is not improvident if it is not an objective and it is a kind of a Hussite. sent8: if something is not a kind of an objective and it is not bronchoscopic then it does not construct idiot. sent9: there is something such that if it does not hunger Wessex and is not a sweet then it is a Micah. sent10: there is something such that if it does not hunger beaked and is not a kind of a ungulate it does disintegrate. sent11: the nosewheel is a kind of an objective if it does not rage mezereum and is not a Garfield. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not hunger malfunctioning and is an objective then it does not construct phasianid. sent13: if the nosewheel does not hunger malfunctioning and is non-objective then it does not construct phasianid. sent14: there exists something such that if it hungers demobilization and it is not ascosporic it is not a clutter. sent15: if the nosewheel is not ready-made and does not construct phasianid then it is not acaudate. sent16: that there exists something such that if it is not a virginal and it is middle-class the fact that it does not hunger beaked hold hold. sent17: if the mezereum is not a maniraptor and not agrobiologic then it is an objective. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a wimp and it is not a kind of an esplanade it hungers denigration. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not a cutworm and does not dispel then it is a ready-made. sent20: the nosewheel is not an objective if it is both not an ornamental and effortless. sent21: the nosewheel is not physiological if it is not untranslatable and it does not construct phasianid.
sent13 -> hypothesis;
the nosewheel does not construct idiot if it is not a kind of an objective and it is not bronchoscopic.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not hunger malfunctioning and it is not a kind of an objective then it does not construct phasianid does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nosewheel does hunger malfunctioning but it is non-objective the fact that it does not construct phasianid is not false. sent2: the knobkerrie is majuscule if it is not agrobiologic and is non-bicameral. sent3: if the nosewheel does not hunger malfunctioning and it is not an objective then it constructs phasianid. sent4: the fact that the phasianid is not objective is correct if it is not a kind of an esplanade and is not effortless. sent5: if something that is not a kind of a gerontologist is not a Toltec then it is not a Sacco. sent6: there exists something such that if it is both not a predicate and not a brush-off it is not a Hussite. sent7: the nosewheel is not improvident if it is not an objective and it is a kind of a Hussite. sent8: if something is not a kind of an objective and it is not bronchoscopic then it does not construct idiot. sent9: there is something such that if it does not hunger Wessex and is not a sweet then it is a Micah. sent10: there is something such that if it does not hunger beaked and is not a kind of a ungulate it does disintegrate. sent11: the nosewheel is a kind of an objective if it does not rage mezereum and is not a Garfield. sent12: there exists something such that if it does not hunger malfunctioning and is an objective then it does not construct phasianid. sent13: if the nosewheel does not hunger malfunctioning and is non-objective then it does not construct phasianid. sent14: there exists something such that if it hungers demobilization and it is not ascosporic it is not a clutter. sent15: if the nosewheel is not ready-made and does not construct phasianid then it is not acaudate. sent16: that there exists something such that if it is not a virginal and it is middle-class the fact that it does not hunger beaked hold hold. sent17: if the mezereum is not a maniraptor and not agrobiologic then it is an objective. sent18: there is something such that if it is not a wimp and it is not a kind of an esplanade it hungers denigration. sent19: there exists something such that if it is not a cutworm and does not dispel then it is a ready-made. sent20: the nosewheel is not an objective if it is both not an ornamental and effortless. sent21: the nosewheel is not physiological if it is not untranslatable and it does not construct phasianid. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__