there is something such that if it is not biosystematic then that it is a thrombolytic but not indiscernible is incorrect.
sent1: something is a causalgia but not translunar if it is not a kind of a catechumen. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not categorical then it is a kind of a echoencephalograph that does not broadcast. sent3: that there is something such that if it is not electrochemical that it is a kind of a HF and it is abundant is not true hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is not an armament the fact that it is a parallel and it is a kind of a Irenaeus is false. sent5: the fact that something is a thrombolytic and it is indiscernible does not hold if it is not biosystematic.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not biosystematic then that it is a thrombolytic but not indiscernible is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: something is a causalgia but not translunar if it is not a kind of a catechumen. sent2: there exists something such that if it is not categorical then it is a kind of a echoencephalograph that does not broadcast. sent3: that there is something such that if it is not electrochemical that it is a kind of a HF and it is abundant is not true hold. sent4: there is something such that if it is not an armament the fact that it is a parallel and it is a kind of a Irenaeus is false. sent5: the fact that something is a thrombolytic and it is indiscernible does not hold if it is not biosystematic. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__