the fiance is pyrochemical.
sent1: the fact that the fiance is not thoughtful but it is indecisive is not right if that it does clap virago is not wrong. sent2: if something that does not clap roundedness is tonal it is not pyrochemical. sent3: if that something does not julienne Leigh and it is not a Forth does not hold then it is non-pyrochemical. sent4: if that something is non-Rousseauan and it is not a kind of a Myxine is false then it is not discordant. sent5: the taper is not thoughtful. sent6: something is tonal if it is either not thoughtful or decisive or both. sent7: the fact that the flagship is not Rousseauan and does not disguise summit is incorrect. sent8: if something does not clap roundedness it is pyrochemical and tonal. sent9: if that something is not thoughtful but it is indecisive does not hold the fact that it is not indecisive is not false. sent10: the fact that if that something is non-cyclopean thing that does not barricade planted is not correct then it is not a kind of a central is correct. sent11: if something is not indecisive then it does not clap roundedness. sent12: that the Herr is non-cyclopean and does not julienne Leigh is not true. sent13: that the juice is both an ordinance and distinguishable is false. sent14: the gharry is not pyrochemical. sent15: that the fiance does not julienne Leigh and it is not a kind of a Forth is false. sent16: that the fiance does not julienne cosmetic is correct if the fact that it is not a Forth and not exact is not right.
sent3 -> int1: the fiance is not pyrochemical if the fact that it does not julienne Leigh and it is not a Forth does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fiance is pyrochemical.
sent8 -> int2: the fiance is not non-pyrochemical and not non-tonal if it does not clap roundedness.; sent11 -> int3: the fiance does not clap roundedness if it is not indecisive.; sent9 -> int4: if the fact that the fiance is not thoughtful but it is indecisive is incorrect it is not indecisive.; sent13 -> int5: there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of an ordinance and it is distinguishable is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fiance is pyrochemical. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fiance is not thoughtful but it is indecisive is not right if that it does clap virago is not wrong. sent2: if something that does not clap roundedness is tonal it is not pyrochemical. sent3: if that something does not julienne Leigh and it is not a Forth does not hold then it is non-pyrochemical. sent4: if that something is non-Rousseauan and it is not a kind of a Myxine is false then it is not discordant. sent5: the taper is not thoughtful. sent6: something is tonal if it is either not thoughtful or decisive or both. sent7: the fact that the flagship is not Rousseauan and does not disguise summit is incorrect. sent8: if something does not clap roundedness it is pyrochemical and tonal. sent9: if that something is not thoughtful but it is indecisive does not hold the fact that it is not indecisive is not false. sent10: the fact that if that something is non-cyclopean thing that does not barricade planted is not correct then it is not a kind of a central is correct. sent11: if something is not indecisive then it does not clap roundedness. sent12: that the Herr is non-cyclopean and does not julienne Leigh is not true. sent13: that the juice is both an ordinance and distinguishable is false. sent14: the gharry is not pyrochemical. sent15: that the fiance does not julienne Leigh and it is not a kind of a Forth is false. sent16: that the fiance does not julienne cosmetic is correct if the fact that it is not a Forth and not exact is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the fiance is not pyrochemical if the fact that it does not julienne Leigh and it is not a Forth does not hold.; int1 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__