the Fang is not a Veda.
sent1: if something is a kind of a bunghole it is ferromagnetic and it is not a biquadratic. sent2: if there is something such that it does gum that that the Minnesotan is not a bunghole and does tin biographer is right is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a bunghole and tins biographer is not true then the pothole is a bunghole. sent4: the Fang is not a kind of a Veda if that the physiotherapist is not a Veda and is non-androgynous is not right. sent5: that the Moor does not efface absinthe and/or does efface prizefight is false if it is a kind of a humanitarian. sent6: the chaser is a gum. sent7: the Moor is a humanitarian. sent8: if something that is ferromagnetic is not a biquadratic then it is not a humanitarian. sent9: if that something does not efface absinthe or it does efface prizefight or both is wrong it is androgynous. sent10: if the Moor is androgynous the Fang is a Veda.
sent9 -> int1: the Moor is androgynous if that it does not efface absinthe and/or it effaces prizefight is not correct.; sent5 & sent7 -> int2: that the Moor does not efface absinthe and/or it effaces prizefight is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Moor is androgynous.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the Fang is not a Veda.
sent8 -> int4: if the pothole is ferromagnetic and not biquadratic it is not humanitarian.; sent1 -> int5: the pothole is both ferromagnetic and not biquadratic if it is a bunghole.; sent6 -> int6: there is something such that it is a gum.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the fact that the Minnesotan is not a bunghole but it does tin biographer does not hold.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that that it is not a bunghole and does tin biographer is incorrect.; int8 & sent3 -> int9: the fact that the pothole is a bunghole hold.; int5 & int9 -> int10: the pothole is ferromagnetic but it is not a biquadratic.; int4 & int10 -> int11: the pothole is not humanitarian.; int11 -> int12: something is not a kind of a humanitarian.;
$hypothesis$ = the Fang is not a Veda. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a bunghole it is ferromagnetic and it is not a biquadratic. sent2: if there is something such that it does gum that that the Minnesotan is not a bunghole and does tin biographer is right is wrong. sent3: if there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a bunghole and tins biographer is not true then the pothole is a bunghole. sent4: the Fang is not a kind of a Veda if that the physiotherapist is not a Veda and is non-androgynous is not right. sent5: that the Moor does not efface absinthe and/or does efface prizefight is false if it is a kind of a humanitarian. sent6: the chaser is a gum. sent7: the Moor is a humanitarian. sent8: if something that is ferromagnetic is not a biquadratic then it is not a humanitarian. sent9: if that something does not efface absinthe or it does efface prizefight or both is wrong it is androgynous. sent10: if the Moor is androgynous the Fang is a Veda. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the Moor is androgynous if that it does not efface absinthe and/or it effaces prizefight is not correct.; sent5 & sent7 -> int2: that the Moor does not efface absinthe and/or it effaces prizefight is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Moor is androgynous.; int3 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__