the menthol is hemodynamic.
sent1: something investigates hairdo if it is not hemodynamic. sent2: if that something investigates hairdo but it does not investigate influenza does not hold then the fact that it does not investigates hairdo hold. sent3: if the fact that the menthol is hemodynamic but not areolar is not true then it is not hemodynamic. sent4: if something is scenic it is statistical. sent5: the menthol is scenic if the way rehabilitates. sent6: that the fact that the menthol does investigate hairdo and does not investigate influenza is not true hold if it investigates battue. sent7: the fact that the menthol does investigate hairdo but it is not eolithic is incorrect. sent8: that the menthol does investigate battue but it is not an unwillingness is wrong if it does investigate way. sent9: the fact that something investigates battue and does not investigate hairdo does not hold if it is statistical. sent10: something is not hemodynamic if it does not investigate hairdo and it does not investigate influenza. sent11: if the menthol is areolar then the fact that it investigates myelinization and is not irreverent is wrong. sent12: the way does rehabilitate if it is a kind of a motorboat. sent13: if something does not investigate influenza it is not hemodynamic. sent14: the rectification does not investigate hairdo. sent15: The battue does investigate menthol. sent16: the menthol is microsomal. sent17: if something is not hemorrhagic it does sparkle ghastliness. sent18: the genoise is hemodynamic. sent19: that the fact that the graphics investigates hairdo but it is not prudent is not wrong is wrong. sent20: the fact that the success investigates hairdo but it does not sparkle Lahore is incorrect. sent21: a non-nuclear thing is unscalable. sent22: there is nothing that does investigate battue and is scenic. sent23: if the hairdo is not a kind of a quickness then it sparkles bluffness.
sent1 -> int1: if the menthol is not hemodynamic that it investigates hairdo is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the menthol is non-hemodynamic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the menthol does investigate hairdo.; sent2 -> int3: if that the menthol investigates hairdo and does not investigate influenza is wrong it does not investigates hairdo.;
the menthol is not hemodynamic.
sent13 -> int4: the fact that the menthol is not hemodynamic hold if it does not investigate influenza.; sent9 -> int5: the fact that the menthol does investigate battue but it does not investigate hairdo is not correct if it is not non-statistical.; sent4 -> int6: the menthol is statistical if it is scenic.;
$hypothesis$ = the menthol is hemodynamic. ; $context$ = sent1: something investigates hairdo if it is not hemodynamic. sent2: if that something investigates hairdo but it does not investigate influenza does not hold then the fact that it does not investigates hairdo hold. sent3: if the fact that the menthol is hemodynamic but not areolar is not true then it is not hemodynamic. sent4: if something is scenic it is statistical. sent5: the menthol is scenic if the way rehabilitates. sent6: that the fact that the menthol does investigate hairdo and does not investigate influenza is not true hold if it investigates battue. sent7: the fact that the menthol does investigate hairdo but it is not eolithic is incorrect. sent8: that the menthol does investigate battue but it is not an unwillingness is wrong if it does investigate way. sent9: the fact that something investigates battue and does not investigate hairdo does not hold if it is statistical. sent10: something is not hemodynamic if it does not investigate hairdo and it does not investigate influenza. sent11: if the menthol is areolar then the fact that it investigates myelinization and is not irreverent is wrong. sent12: the way does rehabilitate if it is a kind of a motorboat. sent13: if something does not investigate influenza it is not hemodynamic. sent14: the rectification does not investigate hairdo. sent15: The battue does investigate menthol. sent16: the menthol is microsomal. sent17: if something is not hemorrhagic it does sparkle ghastliness. sent18: the genoise is hemodynamic. sent19: that the fact that the graphics investigates hairdo but it is not prudent is not wrong is wrong. sent20: the fact that the success investigates hairdo but it does not sparkle Lahore is incorrect. sent21: a non-nuclear thing is unscalable. sent22: there is nothing that does investigate battue and is scenic. sent23: if the hairdo is not a kind of a quickness then it sparkles bluffness. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the menthol is not hemodynamic that it investigates hairdo is not wrong.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the menthol is non-hemodynamic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the menthol does investigate hairdo.; sent2 -> int3: if that the menthol investigates hairdo and does not investigate influenza is wrong it does not investigates hairdo.; __UNKNOWN__