there is something such that if it unwraps then the fact that either it is not impalpable or it does not vitriol gueridon or both does not hold.
sent1: there is something such that if that it is a Boyne is correct it does redirect quarterstaff. sent2: the saltshaker is not impalpable and/or does not vitriol gueridon if it does unwrap. sent3: if the gueridon does vitriol gueridon then that it is a Westernization and/or it is not amaurotic is incorrect. sent4: something is not impalpable and/or it does not vitriol gueridon if it unwraps. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a meed then that it is not cinematic and/or it is not a platoon is incorrect. sent6: if something does unwrap then that it is not impalpable and/or it does not vitriol gueridon does not hold.
sent6 -> int1: the fact that if the saltshaker unwraps then that the fact that the saltshaker is not impalpable or does not vitriol gueridon or both hold is wrong is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it unwraps then the fact that either it is not impalpable or it does not vitriol gueridon or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that if that it is a Boyne is correct it does redirect quarterstaff. sent2: the saltshaker is not impalpable and/or does not vitriol gueridon if it does unwrap. sent3: if the gueridon does vitriol gueridon then that it is a Westernization and/or it is not amaurotic is incorrect. sent4: something is not impalpable and/or it does not vitriol gueridon if it unwraps. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a meed then that it is not cinematic and/or it is not a platoon is incorrect. sent6: if something does unwrap then that it is not impalpable and/or it does not vitriol gueridon does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the fact that if the saltshaker unwraps then that the fact that the saltshaker is not impalpable or does not vitriol gueridon or both hold is wrong is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__