the exempting retroflection does not occur.
sent1: the exempting speakership happens. sent2: the cone happens. sent3: if the scending happens and the exempting retroflection does not occur then the describing gee-gee does not occur. sent4: the exempting retroflection does not occur if not the scending but the coning occurs. sent5: the scending and the cone happens. sent6: the describing gee-gee occurs.
sent5 -> int1: the scending occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exempting retroflection does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scending occurs but the exempting retroflection does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the describing gee-gee does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the exempting retroflection does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the exempting retroflection does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the exempting speakership happens. sent2: the cone happens. sent3: if the scending happens and the exempting retroflection does not occur then the describing gee-gee does not occur. sent4: the exempting retroflection does not occur if not the scending but the coning occurs. sent5: the scending and the cone happens. sent6: the describing gee-gee occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the scending occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the exempting retroflection does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the scending occurs but the exempting retroflection does not occur.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the describing gee-gee does not occur.; int3 & sent6 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__