the fact that the ungulate brings about that the sacerdotalness does not occur and the varicelliformness occurs is wrong.
sent1: that the feud happens and the ungulate occurs is triggered by that the hedging lightlessness does not occur. sent2: if the ravage happens then the dissimilating Hemingway does not occur but the varicelliformness occurs. sent3: if the overpayment occurs the cirrus occurs. sent4: if the bipedalness does not occur then the overpayment happens and the hedging zinger happens. sent5: if the ungulate occurs and the hedging lightlessness happens the sacerdotalness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the hedging feat occurs is true then the fact that the ravage does not occur but the dissimilating Hemingway happens is false. sent7: the ravage happens. sent8: the hedging lightlessness happens. sent9: if the cirrus happens then that the blandishment occurs and the downstage does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the fact that the blandishment and the non-downstageness happens is incorrect the hedging feat happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ungulate occurs.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the ungulate and the hedging lightlessness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sacerdotalness does not occur.; sent2 & sent7 -> int3: not the dissimilating Hemingway but the varicelliformness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the varicelliformness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the non-sacerdotalness and the varicelliformness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the feuding happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ungulate brings about that the sacerdotalness does not occur and the varicelliformness occurs is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the feud happens and the ungulate occurs is triggered by that the hedging lightlessness does not occur. sent2: if the ravage happens then the dissimilating Hemingway does not occur but the varicelliformness occurs. sent3: if the overpayment occurs the cirrus occurs. sent4: if the bipedalness does not occur then the overpayment happens and the hedging zinger happens. sent5: if the ungulate occurs and the hedging lightlessness happens the sacerdotalness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the hedging feat occurs is true then the fact that the ravage does not occur but the dissimilating Hemingway happens is false. sent7: the ravage happens. sent8: the hedging lightlessness happens. sent9: if the cirrus happens then that the blandishment occurs and the downstage does not occur is not correct. sent10: if the fact that the blandishment and the non-downstageness happens is incorrect the hedging feat happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the ungulate occurs.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the ungulate and the hedging lightlessness occurs.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the sacerdotalness does not occur.; sent2 & sent7 -> int3: not the dissimilating Hemingway but the varicelliformness occurs.; int3 -> int4: the varicelliformness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the non-sacerdotalness and the varicelliformness happens.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__