the fact that that the issue is nonindustrial and/or it does secede is true is incorrect.
sent1: the Zambian is nonindustrial if the fact that that the issue is not impolitic but it does secede is not wrong does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the Zambian does not grade indistinctness but it is not politic does not hold the issue is nonindustrial. sent3: if that the tarmacadam is noncollapsible is correct then the fact that the kasbah is comic hold. sent4: the Cologne is an operator. sent5: the issue is nonindustrial if the Zambian is not impolitic. sent6: if something is comic then it is a unrelatedness. sent7: the Zambian is nonindustrial if the fact that the issue does not grade indistinctness and is impolitic is wrong. sent8: the fact that the issue grades indistinctness is not incorrect if that the Zambian does not secede but it is nonindustrial is not right. sent9: the fact that the issue is nonindustrial and/or it secedes is incorrect if that the Zambian is not arborical is right. sent10: if the fact that the driveway does not count Tanoan is not false the tarmacadam is polytheistic and/or it is noncollapsible. sent11: the fact that something counts Zambian and it counts Tanoan does not hold if it is not Teutonic. sent12: the waterway is a cribbage. sent13: that the Zambian is not arborical is not incorrect if the cutwork is arborical and it does count Salerno. sent14: that the Zambian does not grade indistinctness but it is impolitic is wrong. sent15: the driveway does not count Tanoan if the fact that the waterway counts Zambian and it does count Tanoan is wrong. sent16: if the kasbah is a unrelatedness the cutwork is arborical. sent17: the kasbah is comic if the tarmacadam is polytheistic. sent18: the ylem is hypoglycemic if that the Cologne is an operator hold. sent19: the issue is syntactic. sent20: if something is a kind of a cribbage it is not Teutonic and it counts philodendron.
sent2 & sent14 -> int1: that the issue is nonindustrial is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the issue is nonindustrial or does secede or both does not hold.
sent6 -> int2: the kasbah is a kind of a unrelatedness if that it is comic is not false.; sent11 -> int3: that the fact that the waterway does count Zambian and it counts Tanoan is false is true if it is not Teutonic.; sent20 -> int4: if the waterway is a cribbage it is not Teutonic and it counts philodendron.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the waterway is not Teutonic and does count philodendron.; int5 -> int6: the waterway is not Teutonic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: that the waterway counts Zambian and it counts Tanoan is not right.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the driveway does not count Tanoan.; sent10 & int8 -> int9: that the tarmacadam either is polytheistic or is noncollapsible or both is right.; int9 & sent17 & sent3 -> int10: the kasbah is comic.; int2 & int10 -> int11: the kasbah is a unrelatedness.; sent16 & int11 -> int12: the cutwork is arborical.; sent18 & sent4 -> int13: the ylem is hypoglycemic.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is hypoglycemic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that that the issue is nonindustrial and/or it does secede is true is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Zambian is nonindustrial if the fact that that the issue is not impolitic but it does secede is not wrong does not hold. sent2: if the fact that the Zambian does not grade indistinctness but it is not politic does not hold the issue is nonindustrial. sent3: if that the tarmacadam is noncollapsible is correct then the fact that the kasbah is comic hold. sent4: the Cologne is an operator. sent5: the issue is nonindustrial if the Zambian is not impolitic. sent6: if something is comic then it is a unrelatedness. sent7: the Zambian is nonindustrial if the fact that the issue does not grade indistinctness and is impolitic is wrong. sent8: the fact that the issue grades indistinctness is not incorrect if that the Zambian does not secede but it is nonindustrial is not right. sent9: the fact that the issue is nonindustrial and/or it secedes is incorrect if that the Zambian is not arborical is right. sent10: if the fact that the driveway does not count Tanoan is not false the tarmacadam is polytheistic and/or it is noncollapsible. sent11: the fact that something counts Zambian and it counts Tanoan does not hold if it is not Teutonic. sent12: the waterway is a cribbage. sent13: that the Zambian is not arborical is not incorrect if the cutwork is arborical and it does count Salerno. sent14: that the Zambian does not grade indistinctness but it is impolitic is wrong. sent15: the driveway does not count Tanoan if the fact that the waterway counts Zambian and it does count Tanoan is wrong. sent16: if the kasbah is a unrelatedness the cutwork is arborical. sent17: the kasbah is comic if the tarmacadam is polytheistic. sent18: the ylem is hypoglycemic if that the Cologne is an operator hold. sent19: the issue is syntactic. sent20: if something is a kind of a cribbage it is not Teutonic and it counts philodendron. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent14 -> int1: that the issue is nonindustrial is not false.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__