that the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic and/or not a polyp does not hold.
sent1: the telpher is hypoglycemic and/or it is a mikvah. sent2: the fact that the tarmacadam is a kind of a mikvah and it is not non-hypoglycemic does not hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the telpher is not a mikvah but it is a kind of a differential is not true is correct if it does not narrate llano. sent4: the tarmacadam is not a kind of a differential. sent5: that the telpher is hypoglycemic but it is not a differential is not right. sent6: the tarmacadam is not submissive. sent7: the fact that the telpher is not a kind of a mikvah hold. sent8: the fact that the tarmacadam is a differential and it is hypoglycemic is not correct. sent9: the fact that the haloform is a cheeseboard but it is not meteoritic is not correct. sent10: if that the telpher is a kind of a sabbatical is not false the fact that it is non-hypoglycemic thing that does narrate llano is not correct. sent11: the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic or a polyp or both. sent12: the cinnabar is not a kind of a polyp. sent13: if that the haloform is not hypoglycemic is correct then either the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic or it is a polyp or both. sent14: that the telpher is a kind of a mikvah and it is a differential is incorrect. sent15: if the haloform does narrate llano but it is not a tuff then that the telpher does not narrate llano is not false. sent16: something narrates llano and is not a tuff if it is not sabbatical. sent17: the telpher is not hypoglycemic if the fact that the haloform is a kind of a mikvah and is not a differential is wrong. sent18: that the fact that the tarmacadam is a kind of a polyp that does narrate skeet is not right hold. sent19: the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic and/or is not a polyp if the haloform is not hypoglycemic. sent20: the haloform is a serval. sent21: if the fact that the telpher is both a mikvah and not a differential does not hold then the haloform is not hypoglycemic. sent22: the haloform is not a polyp. sent23: that if the fact that the telpher is not a mikvah and is a differential does not hold the fact that the tarmacadam is not a mikvah is correct hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the telpher is a mikvah but it is not a differential.; assump1 -> int1: the telpher is a mikvah.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the telpher is a mikvah but it is not a kind of a differential does not hold.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: the haloform is not hypoglycemic.; sent19 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic and/or it is not a polyp is false.
sent16 -> int5: the haloform narrates llano and is not a tuff if it is not a sabbatical.;
$hypothesis$ = that the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic and/or not a polyp does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the telpher is hypoglycemic and/or it is a mikvah. sent2: the fact that the tarmacadam is a kind of a mikvah and it is not non-hypoglycemic does not hold. sent3: the fact that the fact that the telpher is not a mikvah but it is a kind of a differential is not true is correct if it does not narrate llano. sent4: the tarmacadam is not a kind of a differential. sent5: that the telpher is hypoglycemic but it is not a differential is not right. sent6: the tarmacadam is not submissive. sent7: the fact that the telpher is not a kind of a mikvah hold. sent8: the fact that the tarmacadam is a differential and it is hypoglycemic is not correct. sent9: the fact that the haloform is a cheeseboard but it is not meteoritic is not correct. sent10: if that the telpher is a kind of a sabbatical is not false the fact that it is non-hypoglycemic thing that does narrate llano is not correct. sent11: the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic or a polyp or both. sent12: the cinnabar is not a kind of a polyp. sent13: if that the haloform is not hypoglycemic is correct then either the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic or it is a polyp or both. sent14: that the telpher is a kind of a mikvah and it is a differential is incorrect. sent15: if the haloform does narrate llano but it is not a tuff then that the telpher does not narrate llano is not false. sent16: something narrates llano and is not a tuff if it is not sabbatical. sent17: the telpher is not hypoglycemic if the fact that the haloform is a kind of a mikvah and is not a differential is wrong. sent18: that the fact that the tarmacadam is a kind of a polyp that does narrate skeet is not right hold. sent19: the tarmacadam is hypoglycemic and/or is not a polyp if the haloform is not hypoglycemic. sent20: the haloform is a serval. sent21: if the fact that the telpher is both a mikvah and not a differential does not hold then the haloform is not hypoglycemic. sent22: the haloform is not a polyp. sent23: that if the fact that the telpher is not a mikvah and is a differential does not hold the fact that the tarmacadam is not a mikvah is correct hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the telpher is a mikvah but it is not a differential.; assump1 -> int1: the telpher is a mikvah.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that the telpher is a mikvah but it is not a kind of a differential does not hold.; sent21 & int3 -> int4: the haloform is not hypoglycemic.; sent19 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__