the LASIK does not occur.
sent1: the hiding does not occur if the muffle happens and the asking knitwear occurs. sent2: the vocalness does not occur but the trephining occurs. sent3: if the bonanza does not occur but the coolness happens the otherness does not occur. sent4: the casketing Aten does not occur. sent5: the attraction happens. sent6: if both the asking beggar and the bonanza occurs then the seasonal does not occur. sent7: if the fledging does not occur then the asking harpy happens. sent8: the fact that the fact that the aquiculturalness and the vocal occurs is not true if the enterprise does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the anxiolyticness happens is not false. sent10: the fact that the asking beggar occurs is not false. sent11: that the LASIK does not occur is prevented by the non-otherness. sent12: if either the bonanza occurs or the LASIK does not occur or both the LASIK does not occur. sent13: the asking reexamination occurs. sent14: that both the non-diffidentness and the non-anxiolyticness occurs is triggered by that the fracturing does not occur. sent15: the enterprise does not occur if that not the multiplying lectureship but the enterprise occurs is wrong. sent16: the oratory occurs if that the bonanza but not the oratory occurs is not correct. sent17: the non-coolness and the non-otherness happens if the anxiolyticness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the bonanza happens and the oratory does not occur is not right if the fact that the asking beggar does not occur is correct. sent19: that the fact that either the bonanza occurs or the LASIK does not occur or both is not incorrect if that the asking beggar does not occur is not wrong is not wrong. sent20: both the seasonal and the anxiolytic happens. sent21: the cooling occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bonanza occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: both the asking beggar and the bonanza happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the seasonal does not occur.; sent20 -> int3: the seasonalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the bonanza does not occur.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the bonanza does not occur but the coolness happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the otherness does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the oratory happens.
$hypothesis$ = the LASIK does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the hiding does not occur if the muffle happens and the asking knitwear occurs. sent2: the vocalness does not occur but the trephining occurs. sent3: if the bonanza does not occur but the coolness happens the otherness does not occur. sent4: the casketing Aten does not occur. sent5: the attraction happens. sent6: if both the asking beggar and the bonanza occurs then the seasonal does not occur. sent7: if the fledging does not occur then the asking harpy happens. sent8: the fact that the fact that the aquiculturalness and the vocal occurs is not true if the enterprise does not occur is not incorrect. sent9: the fact that the anxiolyticness happens is not false. sent10: the fact that the asking beggar occurs is not false. sent11: that the LASIK does not occur is prevented by the non-otherness. sent12: if either the bonanza occurs or the LASIK does not occur or both the LASIK does not occur. sent13: the asking reexamination occurs. sent14: that both the non-diffidentness and the non-anxiolyticness occurs is triggered by that the fracturing does not occur. sent15: the enterprise does not occur if that not the multiplying lectureship but the enterprise occurs is wrong. sent16: the oratory occurs if that the bonanza but not the oratory occurs is not correct. sent17: the non-coolness and the non-otherness happens if the anxiolyticness does not occur. sent18: the fact that the bonanza happens and the oratory does not occur is not right if the fact that the asking beggar does not occur is correct. sent19: that the fact that either the bonanza occurs or the LASIK does not occur or both is not incorrect if that the asking beggar does not occur is not wrong is not wrong. sent20: both the seasonal and the anxiolytic happens. sent21: the cooling occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bonanza occurs.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: both the asking beggar and the bonanza happens.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the seasonal does not occur.; sent20 -> int3: the seasonalness occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the bonanza does not occur.; int5 & sent21 -> int6: the bonanza does not occur but the coolness happens.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the otherness does not occur.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__