that the mesolithicness occurs or the halving anomaly does not occur or both is incorrect if the asteroidalness does not occur.
sent1: that the administration does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the titration occurs if the dehumanization happens. sent3: the fact that the mamboing happens and the dehumanization does not occur is wrong if the asteroidalness does not occur. sent4: that the keystroke does not occur but the functioning backstitch happens does not hold if the administration does not occur. sent5: if the blistering jigger does not occur the halving anomaly happens. sent6: the halving DP occurs if that not the keystroke but the functioning backstitch happens does not hold. sent7: that the titration occurs and the halving DP happens brings about that the blistering jigger does not occur. sent8: the fact that the mesolithicness happens or the halving anomaly does not occur or both is wrong if the blistering jigger does not occur. sent9: the fact that the hydrographicness occurs and the spillage occurs is not right if the uprightness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the mamboing occurs but the dehumanization does not occur does not hold then the titration happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the asteroidalness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the mamboing but not the dehumanization happens is not right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the titration occurs is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent1 -> int3: that not the keystroke but the functioning backstitch happens is not correct.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the halving DP occurs is correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the titration and the halving DP happens.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the blistering jigger does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the mesolithicness happens or the halving anomaly does not occur or both is not true.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the mesolithicness occurs or the halving anomaly does not occur or both is incorrect if the asteroidalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the administration does not occur is not wrong. sent2: the titration occurs if the dehumanization happens. sent3: the fact that the mamboing happens and the dehumanization does not occur is wrong if the asteroidalness does not occur. sent4: that the keystroke does not occur but the functioning backstitch happens does not hold if the administration does not occur. sent5: if the blistering jigger does not occur the halving anomaly happens. sent6: the halving DP occurs if that not the keystroke but the functioning backstitch happens does not hold. sent7: that the titration occurs and the halving DP happens brings about that the blistering jigger does not occur. sent8: the fact that the mesolithicness happens or the halving anomaly does not occur or both is wrong if the blistering jigger does not occur. sent9: the fact that the hydrographicness occurs and the spillage occurs is not right if the uprightness does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the mamboing occurs but the dehumanization does not occur does not hold then the titration happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the asteroidalness does not occur.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: that the mamboing but not the dehumanization happens is not right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the titration occurs is not incorrect.; sent4 & sent1 -> int3: that not the keystroke but the functioning backstitch happens is not correct.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: that the halving DP occurs is correct.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the titration and the halving DP happens.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the blistering jigger does not occur.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: that the mesolithicness happens or the halving anomaly does not occur or both is not true.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__