the fact that if the orthomyxovirus is a stigmata then the jaw is a kind of a ritual is incorrect.
sent1: if that the jaw is a stigmata is true then the orthomyxovirus denationalizes damn. sent2: that something is not a kind of a stigmata and is a kind of a ritual does not hold if it does denationalize damn. sent3: if the jaw is a ritual then that it denationalizes damn and it is not a stigmata is incorrect. sent4: if something is Hertzian then that it denationalizes damn and it is not a kind of a ritual is wrong. sent5: that something is Hertzian but it is non-ritual is not right if it is a kind of a stigmata. sent6: the fact that the jaw denationalizes damn and is a stigmata is not true. sent7: if something is a say then it does denationalize damn. sent8: the spirillum is not a ritual if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a stigmata and it is not ritual is incorrect. sent9: if the orthomyxovirus is a stigmata the fact that it is agonistic and it is not non-Hertzian does not hold. sent10: that something is agonistic and non-Hertzian is false if it is a kind of a stigmata. sent11: that the jaw does not denationalize damn is right if the fact that the orthomyxovirus is agonistic thing that is not Hertzian is not correct. sent12: the jaw does not denationalize damn if the orthomyxovirus is Hertzian. sent13: the fact that the orthomyxovirus is agonistic and is Hertzian does not hold. sent14: there is something such that it is mesic. sent15: that the sunchoke does not denationalize blubber and does drink grouping is not correct if it is Andean. sent16: if there are mesic things then the sunchoke is Andean. sent17: if that the jaw does not denationalize damn is not incorrect then it is a ritual. sent18: the jaw is a chain-smoker if it does not emote debugger. sent19: something says if it does denationalize blubber. sent20: the fact that the orthomyxovirus is a kind of a stigmata that does denationalize damn is false. sent21: if the orthomyxovirus does denationalize damn then the jaw is agonistic. sent22: if the orthomyxovirus is not a quantum it is a kind of a say. sent23: if something is a stigmata then the fact that it is both agonistic and not non-Hertzian is not correct.
sent10 -> int1: if the orthomyxovirus is a kind of a stigmata then the fact that it is agonistic and is not Hertzian is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthomyxovirus is a stigmata.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the orthomyxovirus is agonistic and non-Hertzian is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the jaw does not denationalize damn.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the jaw is a kind of a ritual.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the spirillum is not a kind of a ritual is true.
sent2 -> int5: if the jaw does denationalize damn that it is not a stigmata and is a ritual is incorrect.; sent7 -> int6: if the jaw is a say it denationalizes damn.; sent19 -> int7: the jaw does say if it does denationalize blubber.; sent14 & sent16 -> int8: the sunchoke is Andean.; sent15 & int8 -> int9: the fact that the sunchoke does not denationalize blubber and does drink grouping is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it does not denationalize blubber and it does drink grouping is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the orthomyxovirus is a stigmata then the jaw is a kind of a ritual is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the jaw is a stigmata is true then the orthomyxovirus denationalizes damn. sent2: that something is not a kind of a stigmata and is a kind of a ritual does not hold if it does denationalize damn. sent3: if the jaw is a ritual then that it denationalizes damn and it is not a stigmata is incorrect. sent4: if something is Hertzian then that it denationalizes damn and it is not a kind of a ritual is wrong. sent5: that something is Hertzian but it is non-ritual is not right if it is a kind of a stigmata. sent6: the fact that the jaw denationalizes damn and is a stigmata is not true. sent7: if something is a say then it does denationalize damn. sent8: the spirillum is not a ritual if there exists something such that the fact that it is not a stigmata and it is not ritual is incorrect. sent9: if the orthomyxovirus is a stigmata the fact that it is agonistic and it is not non-Hertzian does not hold. sent10: that something is agonistic and non-Hertzian is false if it is a kind of a stigmata. sent11: that the jaw does not denationalize damn is right if the fact that the orthomyxovirus is agonistic thing that is not Hertzian is not correct. sent12: the jaw does not denationalize damn if the orthomyxovirus is Hertzian. sent13: the fact that the orthomyxovirus is agonistic and is Hertzian does not hold. sent14: there is something such that it is mesic. sent15: that the sunchoke does not denationalize blubber and does drink grouping is not correct if it is Andean. sent16: if there are mesic things then the sunchoke is Andean. sent17: if that the jaw does not denationalize damn is not incorrect then it is a ritual. sent18: the jaw is a chain-smoker if it does not emote debugger. sent19: something says if it does denationalize blubber. sent20: the fact that the orthomyxovirus is a kind of a stigmata that does denationalize damn is false. sent21: if the orthomyxovirus does denationalize damn then the jaw is agonistic. sent22: if the orthomyxovirus is not a quantum it is a kind of a say. sent23: if something is a stigmata then the fact that it is both agonistic and not non-Hertzian is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: if the orthomyxovirus is a kind of a stigmata then the fact that it is agonistic and is not Hertzian is incorrect.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the orthomyxovirus is a stigmata.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the orthomyxovirus is agonistic and non-Hertzian is not correct.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the jaw does not denationalize damn.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the jaw is a kind of a ritual.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__