if the fact that not the cocooning but the jog occurs is not correct the jog does not occur.
sent1: if the fact that the non-progressiveness and the mushing occurs does not hold the mushing does not occur. sent2: the cocooning is prevented by either the overpressure or that the takeaway happens or both. sent3: the takeaway occurs.
sent3 -> int1: either the overpressure happens or the takeaway happens or both.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the cocooning does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the jog occurs is not incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: not the cocooning but the jog occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the cocooning does not occur and the jogging occurs is false.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the jogging does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the fact that not the cocooning but the jog occurs is not correct the jog does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the non-progressiveness and the mushing occurs does not hold the mushing does not occur. sent2: the cocooning is prevented by either the overpressure or that the takeaway happens or both. sent3: the takeaway occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: either the overpressure happens or the takeaway happens or both.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the cocooning does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the jog occurs is not incorrect.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: not the cocooning but the jog occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the cocooning does not occur and the jogging occurs is false.; int3 & assump2 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the jogging does not occur.; [assump2] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__