the backing is a kind of a bedrest but it is not chronological.
sent1: that the backing is a kind of a bedrest that is chronological is not correct. sent2: if something is not chronological and it is not a kind of a contraction the fact that it is an auditorium is true. sent3: something is non-chronological and is not a contraction if it is not a bedrest. sent4: that the sequoia is quadrupedal is not correct. sent5: the harpsichord is a kind of a whiffer but it is non-spermous if the Esselen is not a Sherrington. sent6: everything is fibrillose and it is Huxleyan. sent7: the harpsichord is not a contraction if it is spermous and it is chronological. sent8: the fact that that the backing is a bedrest that is not chronological is not right if the harpsichord is a kind of a contraction hold. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not acquaint Acorus and is a kind of a Carthusian is wrong. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is not quadrupedal and does not staple gaze is incorrect then the Yquem is quadrupedal. sent11: the Yquem is not unsalable. sent12: the fact that the harpsichord is not a kind of a Sherrington is not incorrect if there is something such that that it does not acquaint Acorus and it is a Carthusian is incorrect. sent13: if something that does bunk Balanchine is not quadrupedal it is not tasteless. sent14: everything staples gaze and it is a whiffer. sent15: if that something is not a Sherrington is right then it is a kind of tasteless thing that is spermous. sent16: the sequoia does bunk Balanchine but it is not quadrupedal. sent17: if the harpsichord is not a contraction the backing does staple gaze and it is tasteless. sent18: the harpsichord is both a contraction and spermous if the sequoia is not a contraction. sent19: if something is a whiffer and is not spermous it is not a contraction. sent20: something is not a bedrest but it is a kind of a whiffer if it is not unsalable. sent21: the Esselen is not salable if the fact that it is a kind of a Carthusian and it is not an ivy is not right. sent22: that the trigger is a narcotic and it bunks Balanchine if something does staple gaze hold. sent23: the fact that the Esselen is not a Sherrington is true if it is not salable and acquaints Acorus. sent24: the fact that something is not quadrupedal and does not staple gaze is false if the fact that it is tasteless is not wrong. sent25: if something is not tasteless but it does staple gaze it is not a contraction. sent26: the harpsichord is spermous.
sent13 -> int1: the sequoia is not tasteless if the fact that it bunks Balanchine and it is not quadrupedal is right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the sequoia is not tasteless.; sent14 -> int3: the sequoia staples gaze and is a kind of a whiffer.; int3 -> int4: that the sequoia staples gaze is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the sequoia is a kind of non-tasteless thing that staples gaze.; sent25 -> int6: if the sequoia is not tasteless but it staples gaze then it is not a contraction.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sequoia is not a contraction.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the harpsichord is a contraction and it is spermous.; int8 -> int9: the harpsichord is a contraction.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the backing is a bedrest but it is not chronological.
sent19 -> int10: if the harpsichord is a kind of a whiffer and is not spermous then it is not a contraction.;
$hypothesis$ = the backing is a kind of a bedrest but it is not chronological. ; $context$ = sent1: that the backing is a kind of a bedrest that is chronological is not correct. sent2: if something is not chronological and it is not a kind of a contraction the fact that it is an auditorium is true. sent3: something is non-chronological and is not a contraction if it is not a bedrest. sent4: that the sequoia is quadrupedal is not correct. sent5: the harpsichord is a kind of a whiffer but it is non-spermous if the Esselen is not a Sherrington. sent6: everything is fibrillose and it is Huxleyan. sent7: the harpsichord is not a contraction if it is spermous and it is chronological. sent8: the fact that that the backing is a bedrest that is not chronological is not right if the harpsichord is a kind of a contraction hold. sent9: there exists something such that that it does not acquaint Acorus and is a kind of a Carthusian is wrong. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is not quadrupedal and does not staple gaze is incorrect then the Yquem is quadrupedal. sent11: the Yquem is not unsalable. sent12: the fact that the harpsichord is not a kind of a Sherrington is not incorrect if there is something such that that it does not acquaint Acorus and it is a Carthusian is incorrect. sent13: if something that does bunk Balanchine is not quadrupedal it is not tasteless. sent14: everything staples gaze and it is a whiffer. sent15: if that something is not a Sherrington is right then it is a kind of tasteless thing that is spermous. sent16: the sequoia does bunk Balanchine but it is not quadrupedal. sent17: if the harpsichord is not a contraction the backing does staple gaze and it is tasteless. sent18: the harpsichord is both a contraction and spermous if the sequoia is not a contraction. sent19: if something is a whiffer and is not spermous it is not a contraction. sent20: something is not a bedrest but it is a kind of a whiffer if it is not unsalable. sent21: the Esselen is not salable if the fact that it is a kind of a Carthusian and it is not an ivy is not right. sent22: that the trigger is a narcotic and it bunks Balanchine if something does staple gaze hold. sent23: the fact that the Esselen is not a Sherrington is true if it is not salable and acquaints Acorus. sent24: the fact that something is not quadrupedal and does not staple gaze is false if the fact that it is tasteless is not wrong. sent25: if something is not tasteless but it does staple gaze it is not a contraction. sent26: the harpsichord is spermous. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the sequoia is not tasteless if the fact that it bunks Balanchine and it is not quadrupedal is right.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the sequoia is not tasteless.; sent14 -> int3: the sequoia staples gaze and is a kind of a whiffer.; int3 -> int4: that the sequoia staples gaze is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the sequoia is a kind of non-tasteless thing that staples gaze.; sent25 -> int6: if the sequoia is not tasteless but it staples gaze then it is not a contraction.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sequoia is not a contraction.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the harpsichord is a contraction and it is spermous.; int8 -> int9: the harpsichord is a contraction.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__