the non-aeronauticalness and the congregationalness happens.
sent1: the evaluation does not occur if that the clinking does not occur is not false. sent2: if the fact that the beagling does not occur is not wrong then the corroding assegai happens and the congregationalness happens. sent3: the extropicness and the congregationalness happens. sent4: the clapping cross does not occur. sent5: that the aeronauticalness happens and the over-the-counterness happens is caused by the non-extropicness. sent6: the over-the-counterness does not occur if the clawing zeppelin does not occur. sent7: the aesculapianness does not occur. sent8: the mollification does not occur but the corroding assegai occurs. sent9: the clawing zeppelin occurs. sent10: the aeronauticalness does not occur if the Labor does not occur. sent11: the over-the-counterness does not occur if the fact that not the Labor but the clawing zeppelin happens is not true. sent12: the over-the-counterness happens. sent13: if the aeronauticalness happens then the sampling occurs. sent14: the beagling does not occur if that the beagling but not the reactiveness occurs does not hold. sent15: if the amphibiousness does not occur then that the beagling but not the reactiveness happens is not true. sent16: the authorship occurs. sent17: the playing does not occur. sent18: the extropicness occurs. sent19: the tacticalness does not occur if the exulting aphid does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the overindulgence but the trailing occurs is not correct then that the playing does not occur hold. sent21: the Parisian does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Labor does not occur and the clawing zeppelin happens is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the over-the-counterness does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Labor does not occur and the clawing zeppelin happens.; int3 -> int4: the Labor does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the aeronauticalness does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: the fact that the congregationalness happens is correct.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the aeronauticalness does not occur but the congregationalness happens does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the non-aeronauticalness and the congregationalness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the evaluation does not occur if that the clinking does not occur is not false. sent2: if the fact that the beagling does not occur is not wrong then the corroding assegai happens and the congregationalness happens. sent3: the extropicness and the congregationalness happens. sent4: the clapping cross does not occur. sent5: that the aeronauticalness happens and the over-the-counterness happens is caused by the non-extropicness. sent6: the over-the-counterness does not occur if the clawing zeppelin does not occur. sent7: the aesculapianness does not occur. sent8: the mollification does not occur but the corroding assegai occurs. sent9: the clawing zeppelin occurs. sent10: the aeronauticalness does not occur if the Labor does not occur. sent11: the over-the-counterness does not occur if the fact that not the Labor but the clawing zeppelin happens is not true. sent12: the over-the-counterness happens. sent13: if the aeronauticalness happens then the sampling occurs. sent14: the beagling does not occur if that the beagling but not the reactiveness occurs does not hold. sent15: if the amphibiousness does not occur then that the beagling but not the reactiveness happens is not true. sent16: the authorship occurs. sent17: the playing does not occur. sent18: the extropicness occurs. sent19: the tacticalness does not occur if the exulting aphid does not occur. sent20: if the fact that not the overindulgence but the trailing occurs is not correct then that the playing does not occur hold. sent21: the Parisian does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the Labor does not occur and the clawing zeppelin happens is not true.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the over-the-counterness does not occur.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the Labor does not occur and the clawing zeppelin happens.; int3 -> int4: the Labor does not occur.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the aeronauticalness does not occur.; sent3 -> int6: the fact that the congregationalness happens is correct.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__