that the trojan dissimilates canine but it does not dissimilate disaffection is not right.
sent1: the fact that the trojan dissimilates canine and it does dissimilate disaffection is incorrect. sent2: if the coalbin does not dissimilate rum and is not polyvalent then the babyminder does dissimilate rum. sent3: if something is not a kind of a crowning the trojan does not hedge intrusion. sent4: that something dissimilates canine and it does dissimilate disaffection does not hold if it does not hedge intrusion. sent5: either something is not merciful or it is not calyceal or both. sent6: something either does not crown or does not hedge intrusion or both. sent7: the fact that the trojan dissimilates canine and it does dissimilate disaffection is false if it does not hedge intrusion. sent8: the fact that the trojan does not hedge intrusion is not incorrect if something either is not a crowning or does not hedge intrusion or both. sent9: the trojan does dissimilate canine and does not dissimilate disaffection if there exists something such that the fact that it hedges intrusion is not incorrect. sent10: something does not restore shag and/or is not a kind of a bluebonnet if that it does not hedge intrusion is true. sent11: the coalbin does not dissimilate rum and is not polyvalent if the arbovirus is a kind of an ethylene. sent12: there is something such that it is not a crowning and/or it does hedge intrusion. sent13: the fact that that the corn is a greyback but it is not a crowning is not correct if the fact that the babyminder dissimilates rum is correct hold. sent14: there exists something such that it is a crowning or does not hedge intrusion or both.
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the trojan does not hedge intrusion.;
the trojan does dissimilate canine and does not dissimilate disaffection.
$hypothesis$ = that the trojan dissimilates canine but it does not dissimilate disaffection is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the trojan dissimilates canine and it does dissimilate disaffection is incorrect. sent2: if the coalbin does not dissimilate rum and is not polyvalent then the babyminder does dissimilate rum. sent3: if something is not a kind of a crowning the trojan does not hedge intrusion. sent4: that something dissimilates canine and it does dissimilate disaffection does not hold if it does not hedge intrusion. sent5: either something is not merciful or it is not calyceal or both. sent6: something either does not crown or does not hedge intrusion or both. sent7: the fact that the trojan dissimilates canine and it does dissimilate disaffection is false if it does not hedge intrusion. sent8: the fact that the trojan does not hedge intrusion is not incorrect if something either is not a crowning or does not hedge intrusion or both. sent9: the trojan does dissimilate canine and does not dissimilate disaffection if there exists something such that the fact that it hedges intrusion is not incorrect. sent10: something does not restore shag and/or is not a kind of a bluebonnet if that it does not hedge intrusion is true. sent11: the coalbin does not dissimilate rum and is not polyvalent if the arbovirus is a kind of an ethylene. sent12: there is something such that it is not a crowning and/or it does hedge intrusion. sent13: the fact that that the corn is a greyback but it is not a crowning is not correct if the fact that the babyminder dissimilates rum is correct hold. sent14: there exists something such that it is a crowning or does not hedge intrusion or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent8 -> int1: the trojan does not hedge intrusion.; __UNKNOWN__