either the eosinophil is a kind of a kumquat or it is not a kind of a Nanaimo or both.
sent1: if the cefoperazone is not a portcullis that the obverse is a Kirghiz and it is federal is incorrect. sent2: if that the escapologist is a e-commerce that does send is wrong then the fact that the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it is consolable. sent4: the cefoperazone is a continuance. sent5: the cefoperazone is both not a Conakry and a continuance if something is a kind of a portcullis. sent6: there is something such that it does house eosinophil. sent7: that the eosinophil is not a Conakry and/or is a continuance is not true if it does not house eosinophil. sent8: something is not a portcullis if that it either is not a kind of a Conakry or is a kind of a continuance or both is not true. sent9: if something that does house eosinophil is consolable then that the escapologist does not rein hold. sent10: that the eosinophil does not house eosinophil is correct if the fact that the cefoperazone is consolable and/or it does house eosinophil is not true. sent11: if something does not rein then the fact that it is consolable and/or it houses eosinophil does not hold. sent12: if something is a portcullis the cefoperazone is a continuance. sent13: the fact that either the eosinophil is a kumquat or it is a Nanaimo or both is true. sent14: the cefoperazone is federal if the caudex is federal. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of a portcullis. sent16: the escapologist is a Nanaimo. sent17: if the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth then the eosinophil is a kumquat or it is not a kind of a Nanaimo or both. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of a e-commerce and it sends does not hold if it is not a rein. sent19: the caudex is federal. sent20: the fact that if the escapologist is not a kind of a e-commerce the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth is right. sent21: the eosinophil is a kumquat or a Nanaimo or both if the fact that the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth hold. sent22: that something is a kind of a kumquat and/or it is not a Nanaimo does not hold if it is not a kind of a portcullis. sent23: if something is a continuance then that it is not a Conakry but a portcullis is not correct. sent24: the cefoperazone is consolable if it is federal. sent25: the cefoperazone does house eosinophil if it is not a kind of a Conakry and it is a continuance.
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the cefoperazone is not a Conakry but it is a continuance.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the cefoperazone houses eosinophil.; sent14 & sent19 -> int3: the cefoperazone is federal.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the cefoperazone is consolable.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the cefoperazone does house eosinophil and is consolable.; int5 -> int6: something does house eosinophil and is consolable.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the escapologist is not a kind of a rein.; sent18 -> int8: that the escapologist is a e-commerce and does send does not hold if it is not a kind of a rein.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that that the escapologist is a e-commerce and it sends is correct does not hold.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth.; int10 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
that the eosinophil is a kumquat and/or it is not a kind of a Nanaimo is wrong.
sent22 -> int11: that the eosinophil is a kumquat and/or it is not a Nanaimo is wrong if it is not a portcullis.; sent8 -> int12: the eosinophil is not a kind of a portcullis if the fact that it is either not a Conakry or a continuance or both is not true.; sent11 -> int13: that the cefoperazone is consolable and/or it does house eosinophil is not correct if it is not a kind of a rein.;
$hypothesis$ = either the eosinophil is a kind of a kumquat or it is not a kind of a Nanaimo or both. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cefoperazone is not a portcullis that the obverse is a Kirghiz and it is federal is incorrect. sent2: if that the escapologist is a e-commerce that does send is wrong then the fact that the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth is not incorrect. sent3: there is something such that it is consolable. sent4: the cefoperazone is a continuance. sent5: the cefoperazone is both not a Conakry and a continuance if something is a kind of a portcullis. sent6: there is something such that it does house eosinophil. sent7: that the eosinophil is not a Conakry and/or is a continuance is not true if it does not house eosinophil. sent8: something is not a portcullis if that it either is not a kind of a Conakry or is a kind of a continuance or both is not true. sent9: if something that does house eosinophil is consolable then that the escapologist does not rein hold. sent10: that the eosinophil does not house eosinophil is correct if the fact that the cefoperazone is consolable and/or it does house eosinophil is not true. sent11: if something does not rein then the fact that it is consolable and/or it houses eosinophil does not hold. sent12: if something is a portcullis the cefoperazone is a continuance. sent13: the fact that either the eosinophil is a kumquat or it is a Nanaimo or both is true. sent14: the cefoperazone is federal if the caudex is federal. sent15: there exists something such that it is a kind of a portcullis. sent16: the escapologist is a Nanaimo. sent17: if the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth then the eosinophil is a kumquat or it is not a kind of a Nanaimo or both. sent18: the fact that something is a kind of a e-commerce and it sends does not hold if it is not a rein. sent19: the caudex is federal. sent20: the fact that if the escapologist is not a kind of a e-commerce the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth is right. sent21: the eosinophil is a kumquat or a Nanaimo or both if the fact that the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth hold. sent22: that something is a kind of a kumquat and/or it is not a Nanaimo does not hold if it is not a kind of a portcullis. sent23: if something is a continuance then that it is not a Conakry but a portcullis is not correct. sent24: the cefoperazone is consolable if it is federal. sent25: the cefoperazone does house eosinophil if it is not a kind of a Conakry and it is a continuance. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the cefoperazone is not a Conakry but it is a continuance.; int1 & sent25 -> int2: the cefoperazone houses eosinophil.; sent14 & sent19 -> int3: the cefoperazone is federal.; sent24 & int3 -> int4: the cefoperazone is consolable.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the cefoperazone does house eosinophil and is consolable.; int5 -> int6: something does house eosinophil and is consolable.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the escapologist is not a kind of a rein.; sent18 -> int8: that the escapologist is a e-commerce and does send does not hold if it is not a kind of a rein.; int7 & int8 -> int9: that that the escapologist is a e-commerce and it sends is correct does not hold.; int9 & sent2 -> int10: the abrocome does not enfeeble wealth.; int10 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__