the coeliacness happens.
sent1: if the multilevelness does not occur then the coeliacness and the garnering conscription happens. sent2: the anticlimacticness or that the smacker does not occur or both brings about that the garnering conscription does not occur. sent3: if the institution does not occur then the ineradicableness and/or the deterrence happens. sent4: that the wandering does not occur and the garnering goblet does not occur is brought about by that the deterrence does not occur. sent5: if that the anticlimacticness occurs and/or the smacker does not occur does not hold then the coeliacness does not occur. sent6: the garnering conscription happens. sent7: if the wandering occurs that the unequalness does not occur and the garnering goblet does not occur is not right. sent8: if the garnering goblet does not occur then the fact that the multilevelness but not the unequalness happens is not correct. sent9: that the coeliacness occurs and the garnering conscription does not occur is triggered by the non-multilevelness. sent10: if the coeliacness happens the fact that the flour happens and/or the garnering fermium does not occur does not hold. sent11: if that the multilevelness occurs and the unequalness does not occur is wrong the multilevelness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anticlimacticness happens and/or the smacker does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the garnering conscription does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the anticlimacticness happens or the smacker does not occur or both is not true.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the coeliacness occurs is right.
$hypothesis$ = the coeliacness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the multilevelness does not occur then the coeliacness and the garnering conscription happens. sent2: the anticlimacticness or that the smacker does not occur or both brings about that the garnering conscription does not occur. sent3: if the institution does not occur then the ineradicableness and/or the deterrence happens. sent4: that the wandering does not occur and the garnering goblet does not occur is brought about by that the deterrence does not occur. sent5: if that the anticlimacticness occurs and/or the smacker does not occur does not hold then the coeliacness does not occur. sent6: the garnering conscription happens. sent7: if the wandering occurs that the unequalness does not occur and the garnering goblet does not occur is not right. sent8: if the garnering goblet does not occur then the fact that the multilevelness but not the unequalness happens is not correct. sent9: that the coeliacness occurs and the garnering conscription does not occur is triggered by the non-multilevelness. sent10: if the coeliacness happens the fact that the flour happens and/or the garnering fermium does not occur does not hold. sent11: if that the multilevelness occurs and the unequalness does not occur is wrong the multilevelness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the anticlimacticness happens and/or the smacker does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the garnering conscription does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the anticlimacticness happens or the smacker does not occur or both is not true.; int3 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__