the fact that the fact that the autofluorescence is not branchiate and/or it does bird is not wrong is wrong.
sent1: that the CFO is non-altitudinal thing that does stiffen is wrong. sent2: the CFO is a sail. sent3: that if there exists something such that it hums lipstick and it is a sail then that the innocense is non-branchiate is right is correct. sent4: if the innocense is not branchiate the autofluorescence is not branchiate and/or it birds. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not hum lipstick is wrong. sent6: something does sail. sent7: if the CFO is altitudinal it hums lipstick. sent8: if that the CFO is not altitudinal but it stiffens does not hold it hums lipstick.
sent8 & sent1 -> int1: the CFO hums lipstick.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the CFO hums lipstick and it does sail.; int2 -> int3: something hums lipstick and is a kind of a sail.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the innocense is not branchiate.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the autofluorescence is not branchiate and/or it does bird is not wrong is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the CFO is non-altitudinal thing that does stiffen is wrong. sent2: the CFO is a sail. sent3: that if there exists something such that it hums lipstick and it is a sail then that the innocense is non-branchiate is right is correct. sent4: if the innocense is not branchiate the autofluorescence is not branchiate and/or it birds. sent5: there exists something such that the fact that it does not hum lipstick is wrong. sent6: something does sail. sent7: if the CFO is altitudinal it hums lipstick. sent8: if that the CFO is not altitudinal but it stiffens does not hold it hums lipstick. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 & sent1 -> int1: the CFO hums lipstick.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the CFO hums lipstick and it does sail.; int2 -> int3: something hums lipstick and is a kind of a sail.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the innocense is not branchiate.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__