that something is not intracerebral and/or it does draw scrapie is not correct.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not bronze and/or is not a kind of a partial is not true the L-dopa does not reflectorize thymol. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not obvious and reflectorizes thymol is not true the chromate comforts credulity. sent3: that the L-dopa is obvious and is postbiblical is right. sent4: the L-dopa is intracerebral or it draws scrapie or both. sent5: the L-dopa is postbiblical. sent6: the ACE is a kind of a classicism if the fact that the Rice is intracerebral is true. sent7: the saltwort is postbiblical. sent8: the L-dopa is not intracerebral if it is a classicism and it does comfort intruder. sent9: the poltergeist does draw Bloemfontein and is unlucky. sent10: if something that is obvious does not reflectorize thymol then it is a kind of a clang. sent11: something is not a bronzed or it is not partial or both. sent12: the fact that something is partial is not false. sent13: there is something such that it either is intracerebral or does draw scrapie or both. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is non-obvious thing that reflectorizes thymol is not true. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is a bronzed or not a partial or both is false. sent16: the L-dopa does not reflectorize thymol if there is something such that the fact that that either it is not a bronzed or it is a partial or both is not false is not right. sent17: that the fact that the L-dopa does not comfort bunion is not wrong is incorrect. sent18: if the L-dopa does clang it does comfort intruder. sent19: either the L-dopa is not non-sphingine or it is a partial or both. sent20: there exists something such that that it does not bronze and/or it is not a partial is false. sent21: the L-dopa is a classicism.
sent3 -> int1: the L-dopa is obvious.; sent20 & sent1 -> int2: the L-dopa does not reflectorize thymol.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the L-dopa is obvious and does not reflectorize thymol.; sent10 -> int4: the L-dopa clangs if it is obvious and it does not reflectorize thymol.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the L-dopa is a clang.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the L-dopa comforts intruder.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the L-dopa is a classicism that does comfort intruder.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the L-dopa is not intracerebral.; int8 -> int9: the L-dopa is not intracerebral or it draws scrapie or both.; int9 -> hypothesis;
the chromate comforts credulity and is postbiblical.
sent14 & sent2 -> int10: the fact that the chromate does comfort credulity is true.;
$hypothesis$ = that something is not intracerebral and/or it does draw scrapie is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not bronze and/or is not a kind of a partial is not true the L-dopa does not reflectorize thymol. sent2: if there exists something such that the fact that it is not obvious and reflectorizes thymol is not true the chromate comforts credulity. sent3: that the L-dopa is obvious and is postbiblical is right. sent4: the L-dopa is intracerebral or it draws scrapie or both. sent5: the L-dopa is postbiblical. sent6: the ACE is a kind of a classicism if the fact that the Rice is intracerebral is true. sent7: the saltwort is postbiblical. sent8: the L-dopa is not intracerebral if it is a classicism and it does comfort intruder. sent9: the poltergeist does draw Bloemfontein and is unlucky. sent10: if something that is obvious does not reflectorize thymol then it is a kind of a clang. sent11: something is not a bronzed or it is not partial or both. sent12: the fact that something is partial is not false. sent13: there is something such that it either is intracerebral or does draw scrapie or both. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is non-obvious thing that reflectorizes thymol is not true. sent15: there is something such that the fact that it is a bronzed or not a partial or both is false. sent16: the L-dopa does not reflectorize thymol if there is something such that the fact that that either it is not a bronzed or it is a partial or both is not false is not right. sent17: that the fact that the L-dopa does not comfort bunion is not wrong is incorrect. sent18: if the L-dopa does clang it does comfort intruder. sent19: either the L-dopa is not non-sphingine or it is a partial or both. sent20: there exists something such that that it does not bronze and/or it is not a partial is false. sent21: the L-dopa is a classicism. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the L-dopa is obvious.; sent20 & sent1 -> int2: the L-dopa does not reflectorize thymol.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the L-dopa is obvious and does not reflectorize thymol.; sent10 -> int4: the L-dopa clangs if it is obvious and it does not reflectorize thymol.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the L-dopa is a clang.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: the L-dopa comforts intruder.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the L-dopa is a classicism that does comfort intruder.; int7 & sent8 -> int8: the L-dopa is not intracerebral.; int8 -> int9: the L-dopa is not intracerebral or it draws scrapie or both.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__