the chimneypot is papilliform.
sent1: the nuthatch is not a jejunity. sent2: everything does not bark Hadith and does not bypass brinkmanship. sent3: if the threat is not a kind of a submucosa and/or it does not bark buffoonery then the midgrass is a Perilla. sent4: the threat is not a submucosa if the chimneypot is papilliform and is microscopic. sent5: the nuthatch is both not a jejunity and not a tombac if it does not bypass brinkmanship. sent6: everything is not a frijol. sent7: if the midgrass is a Perilla then the nuthatch is a tombac. sent8: the chimneypot is microscopic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chimneypot is papilliform is right.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the chimneypot is a kind of papilliform thing that is microscopic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the threat is not a submucosa.; int2 -> int3: the threat is not a submucosa or does not bark buffoonery or both.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the midgrass is a Perilla.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the nuthatch is a tombac.; sent2 -> int6: the fact that the nuthatch does not bark Hadith and it does not bypass brinkmanship is not incorrect.; int6 -> int7: the nuthatch does not bypass brinkmanship.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the nuthatch is not a jejunity and it is not a kind of a tombac.; int8 -> int9: the nuthatch is not a tombac.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the chimneypot is papilliform. ; $context$ = sent1: the nuthatch is not a jejunity. sent2: everything does not bark Hadith and does not bypass brinkmanship. sent3: if the threat is not a kind of a submucosa and/or it does not bark buffoonery then the midgrass is a Perilla. sent4: the threat is not a submucosa if the chimneypot is papilliform and is microscopic. sent5: the nuthatch is both not a jejunity and not a tombac if it does not bypass brinkmanship. sent6: everything is not a frijol. sent7: if the midgrass is a Perilla then the nuthatch is a tombac. sent8: the chimneypot is microscopic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chimneypot is papilliform is right.; assump1 & sent8 -> int1: the chimneypot is a kind of papilliform thing that is microscopic.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the threat is not a submucosa.; int2 -> int3: the threat is not a submucosa or does not bark buffoonery or both.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the midgrass is a Perilla.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the nuthatch is a tombac.; sent2 -> int6: the fact that the nuthatch does not bark Hadith and it does not bypass brinkmanship is not incorrect.; int6 -> int7: the nuthatch does not bypass brinkmanship.; sent5 & int7 -> int8: the nuthatch is not a jejunity and it is not a kind of a tombac.; int8 -> int9: the nuthatch is not a tombac.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__