that the Orleanist is not a spendthrift is not incorrect.
sent1: the toothpick is an instrumentation if it is not a kind of a table. sent2: the toothpick is not a kind of a table. sent3: if the toothpick is associative and brassy then the Orleanist is not a kind of a spendthrift. sent4: the fact that the fumigant is not butyric is wrong if there is something such that the fact that it is not butyric and it is not a Russell is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of an overpopulation then it is a kind of a golfcart and it is a sedateness. sent6: there exists something such that it is not butyric and it is not a Russell. sent7: the toothpick is a kind of associative thing that is a kind of an instrumentation if it is not a table. sent8: the fumigant is not butyric if it lambs cricketer and/or it is not a toucanet. sent9: there is something such that that it is not butyric and it is not a kind of a Russell is incorrect. sent10: if that the fumigant does lamb cricketer or is not a kind of a toucanet or both does not hold the toothpick is brassy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fumigant lambs cricketer or is not a kind of a toucanet or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fumigant is non-butyric.; sent9 & sent4 -> int2: the fumigant is butyric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the fumigant does lamb cricketer or it is not a toucanet or both is incorrect.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the toothpick is brassy.; sent7 & sent2 -> int6: the toothpick is associative and it is an instrumentation.; int6 -> int7: the toothpick is associative.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the toothpick is associative and it is brassy.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
if the roughcast is not an overpopulation then it is both a golfcart and a sedateness.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the Orleanist is not a spendthrift is not incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the toothpick is an instrumentation if it is not a kind of a table. sent2: the toothpick is not a kind of a table. sent3: if the toothpick is associative and brassy then the Orleanist is not a kind of a spendthrift. sent4: the fact that the fumigant is not butyric is wrong if there is something such that the fact that it is not butyric and it is not a Russell is false. sent5: if something is not a kind of an overpopulation then it is a kind of a golfcart and it is a sedateness. sent6: there exists something such that it is not butyric and it is not a Russell. sent7: the toothpick is a kind of associative thing that is a kind of an instrumentation if it is not a table. sent8: the fumigant is not butyric if it lambs cricketer and/or it is not a toucanet. sent9: there is something such that that it is not butyric and it is not a kind of a Russell is incorrect. sent10: if that the fumigant does lamb cricketer or is not a kind of a toucanet or both does not hold the toothpick is brassy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fumigant lambs cricketer or is not a kind of a toucanet or both.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the fumigant is non-butyric.; sent9 & sent4 -> int2: the fumigant is butyric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the fact that either the fumigant does lamb cricketer or it is not a toucanet or both is incorrect.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the toothpick is brassy.; sent7 & sent2 -> int6: the toothpick is associative and it is an instrumentation.; int6 -> int7: the toothpick is associative.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the toothpick is associative and it is brassy.; int8 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__