the spelt foams and it is flimsy.
sent1: if the seven-spot is not Senecan that the willet is not cadastral or it does not unionize or both is wrong. sent2: the baize is not ducal and it is not a tophus if there is something such that it does not suckle ethnocentrism. sent3: something does not suckle ethnocentrism. sent4: if there is something such that it is not ducal and it is not a tophus then the seven-spot is not Senecan. sent5: if the fact that the willet is not cadastral or it does not unionize or both is not true then the spelt is not a disliked. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is both not Senecan and not a foam does not hold. sent7: the fact that something does foam and is flimsy is not right if it is not a disliked.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the baize is not ducal and it is not a tophus is correct.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of non-ducal thing that is not a tophus.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the seven-spot is not Senecan.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the willet is not cadastral or it does not unionize or both does not hold.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the spelt is not a disliked is true.; sent7 -> int6: the fact that the spelt does foam and it is not non-flimsy is incorrect if it is not a disliked.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis;
the spelt is a kind of a foam and it is flimsy.
$hypothesis$ = the spelt foams and it is flimsy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the seven-spot is not Senecan that the willet is not cadastral or it does not unionize or both is wrong. sent2: the baize is not ducal and it is not a tophus if there is something such that it does not suckle ethnocentrism. sent3: something does not suckle ethnocentrism. sent4: if there is something such that it is not ducal and it is not a tophus then the seven-spot is not Senecan. sent5: if the fact that the willet is not cadastral or it does not unionize or both is not true then the spelt is not a disliked. sent6: there is something such that the fact that it is both not Senecan and not a foam does not hold. sent7: the fact that something does foam and is flimsy is not right if it is not a disliked. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the fact that the baize is not ducal and it is not a tophus is correct.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of non-ducal thing that is not a tophus.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the seven-spot is not Senecan.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the fact that the willet is not cadastral or it does not unionize or both does not hold.; int4 & sent5 -> int5: that the spelt is not a disliked is true.; sent7 -> int6: the fact that the spelt does foam and it is not non-flimsy is incorrect if it is not a disliked.; int5 & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__