the sporozoan is not meritocratic.
sent1: something that does peruse bracero is digestible. sent2: that the biohazard does not brief barrels is not false if there is something such that it is not a kind of a tribuneship. sent3: something is meritocratic if that it is a shopping but not Mozartian is wrong. sent4: that the birdnest does not peruse anomia and is agential does not hold. sent5: that the groundfish is not agential hold if that the birdnest does not peruse anomia and is agential is false. sent6: if the biohazard is a putter but not meritocratic then it is digestible. sent7: if the wave is not a kind of a wound then the fact that either the venom is not achlorhydric or it is a polypropylene or both does not hold. sent8: the biohazard is not digestible. sent9: the biohazard is not a electroencephalogram. sent10: the ossification is a cross-classification and not meritocratic. sent11: if the fact that the hagiographer does brief barrels is not incorrect then the biohazard is a shopping. sent12: if the biohazard does not brief barrels the fact that the spirochete is a shopping and not Mozartian is false. sent13: the biohazard is digestible if the fact that the sporozoan does peruse bracero is correct. sent14: if something is Mozartian then that it is digestible and does not peruse bracero does not hold. sent15: the sporozoan is not meritocratic if it is a electroencephalogram. sent16: the stockman does peruse bracero but it does not procure. sent17: if the groundfish is carvel-built but it is not agential then the hagiographer is a tribuneship. sent18: the sporozoan is not meritocratic if that the fact that it does putter and it is not a electroencephalogram is true is not correct. sent19: the groundfish is a kind of carvel-built thing that is not agential if the birdnest does not peruse anomia. sent20: something does brief barrels if it is a tribuneship. sent21: the sporozoan is Mozartian if the biohazard is a shopping. sent22: something is meritocratic if the fact that the fact that it is digestible and it does not peruse bracero hold is incorrect. sent23: something peruses bracero if it is a putter and is not a electroencephalogram. sent24: if there exists something such that it is not agential then the hagiographer is not a kind of a tribuneship.
sent23 -> int1: the sporozoan peruses bracero if it is a putter that is not a electroencephalogram.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sporozoan is a putter but not a electroencephalogram.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sporozoan does peruse bracero.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: that the biohazard is digestible is right.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the sporozoan does putter but it is not a electroencephalogram is false.; int5 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the spirochete is digestible.
sent1 -> int6: the spirochete is digestible if that it does peruse bracero is not false.; sent3 -> int7: the spirochete is meritocratic if the fact that it is both a shopping and not Mozartian is incorrect.; sent5 & sent4 -> int8: the groundfish is not agential.; int8 -> int9: there are non-agential things.; int9 & sent24 -> int10: the hagiographer is not a tribuneship.; int10 -> int11: something is not a tribuneship.; int11 & sent2 -> int12: the biohazard does not brief barrels.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: that the spirochete is a shopping but it is not Mozartian is not true.; int7 & int13 -> int14: the spirochete is meritocratic.;
$hypothesis$ = the sporozoan is not meritocratic. ; $context$ = sent1: something that does peruse bracero is digestible. sent2: that the biohazard does not brief barrels is not false if there is something such that it is not a kind of a tribuneship. sent3: something is meritocratic if that it is a shopping but not Mozartian is wrong. sent4: that the birdnest does not peruse anomia and is agential does not hold. sent5: that the groundfish is not agential hold if that the birdnest does not peruse anomia and is agential is false. sent6: if the biohazard is a putter but not meritocratic then it is digestible. sent7: if the wave is not a kind of a wound then the fact that either the venom is not achlorhydric or it is a polypropylene or both does not hold. sent8: the biohazard is not digestible. sent9: the biohazard is not a electroencephalogram. sent10: the ossification is a cross-classification and not meritocratic. sent11: if the fact that the hagiographer does brief barrels is not incorrect then the biohazard is a shopping. sent12: if the biohazard does not brief barrels the fact that the spirochete is a shopping and not Mozartian is false. sent13: the biohazard is digestible if the fact that the sporozoan does peruse bracero is correct. sent14: if something is Mozartian then that it is digestible and does not peruse bracero does not hold. sent15: the sporozoan is not meritocratic if it is a electroencephalogram. sent16: the stockman does peruse bracero but it does not procure. sent17: if the groundfish is carvel-built but it is not agential then the hagiographer is a tribuneship. sent18: the sporozoan is not meritocratic if that the fact that it does putter and it is not a electroencephalogram is true is not correct. sent19: the groundfish is a kind of carvel-built thing that is not agential if the birdnest does not peruse anomia. sent20: something does brief barrels if it is a tribuneship. sent21: the sporozoan is Mozartian if the biohazard is a shopping. sent22: something is meritocratic if the fact that the fact that it is digestible and it does not peruse bracero hold is incorrect. sent23: something peruses bracero if it is a putter and is not a electroencephalogram. sent24: if there exists something such that it is not agential then the hagiographer is not a kind of a tribuneship. ; $proof$ = 
sent23 -> int1: the sporozoan peruses bracero if it is a putter that is not a electroencephalogram.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sporozoan is a putter but not a electroencephalogram.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the sporozoan does peruse bracero.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: that the biohazard is digestible is right.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: that the sporozoan does putter but it is not a electroencephalogram is false.; int5 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__