the dating Reptilia occurs.
sent1: the tradeoff occurs. sent2: the uttering Amen happens. sent3: the botanicness does not occur if both the octalness and the serendipity happens. sent4: the uttering liger happens. sent5: the unveiling strafe happens. sent6: if the dating nopal and the unveiling strafe happens then the unveiling philhellenism does not occur. sent7: if that the porterage but not the unveiling stodge happens does not hold then the speleology happens. sent8: the housework occurs if the scission occurs. sent9: that the protruding and the cardinalship happens is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the purchase but not the uttering gonioscopy happens does not hold if the digitalness does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the impiousness and the unveiling strafe happens is not correct if the unveiling deerberry does not occur. sent12: if that the octalness does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the exulting happens and the version does not occur is incorrect. sent13: the uttering Podargus happens. sent14: that the bleeping occurs is not wrong. sent15: if that the version occurs is correct then the dating Reptilia happens. sent16: the serendipity happens. sent17: the fact that the dating Reptilia happens is not wrong if that the exulting but not the version occurs is not true. sent18: the digitalness happens. sent19: the monte happens. sent20: the botanicness occurs. sent21: the unveiling oroide occurs if that the mowing but not the foaming happens is incorrect. sent22: the mowing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the octalness happens.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: the octalness occurs and the serendipity happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the botanicness does not occur.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the octalness does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: that the exulting but not the version happens does not hold.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the dating Reptilia occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the tradeoff occurs. sent2: the uttering Amen happens. sent3: the botanicness does not occur if both the octalness and the serendipity happens. sent4: the uttering liger happens. sent5: the unveiling strafe happens. sent6: if the dating nopal and the unveiling strafe happens then the unveiling philhellenism does not occur. sent7: if that the porterage but not the unveiling stodge happens does not hold then the speleology happens. sent8: the housework occurs if the scission occurs. sent9: that the protruding and the cardinalship happens is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the purchase but not the uttering gonioscopy happens does not hold if the digitalness does not occur. sent11: the fact that both the impiousness and the unveiling strafe happens is not correct if the unveiling deerberry does not occur. sent12: if that the octalness does not occur is not wrong then the fact that the exulting happens and the version does not occur is incorrect. sent13: the uttering Podargus happens. sent14: that the bleeping occurs is not wrong. sent15: if that the version occurs is correct then the dating Reptilia happens. sent16: the serendipity happens. sent17: the fact that the dating Reptilia happens is not wrong if that the exulting but not the version occurs is not true. sent18: the digitalness happens. sent19: the monte happens. sent20: the botanicness occurs. sent21: the unveiling oroide occurs if that the mowing but not the foaming happens is incorrect. sent22: the mowing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the octalness happens.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: the octalness occurs and the serendipity happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the botanicness does not occur.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the octalness does not occur.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: that the exulting but not the version happens does not hold.; int5 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__