the fact that the reflectometer is caprine but not a one-fifth does not hold.
sent1: the pantsuit is a kind of caprine thing that does not redden robe-de-chambre if the reflectometer lauds. sent2: if the reflectometer is a sunscreen then the pantsuit is not a kind of a one-fifth. sent3: if that the upper does laud hold then the pantsuit is a kind of a sunscreen that does not redden robe-de-chambre. sent4: the reflectometer does not laud if the upper is caprine. sent5: the fact that the reflectometer is not a Hipsurus is not wrong. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of caprine thing that is not a one-fifth does not hold if the fact that it lauds hold. sent7: the reflectometer is caprine thing that is not a kind of a one-fifth if the romper is caprine. sent8: the upper is not theosophical but it gets reversal if the pantsuit is not a kind of a chemosynthesis. sent9: if the reflectometer is caprine but it is not a sunscreen then the pantsuit does laud. sent10: the upper is caprine thing that does not laud if the romper is a sunscreen. sent11: something that does not get Congridae does laud and does angle inferior. sent12: the upper lauds. sent13: the upper is not a sunscreen. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a phytotoxin that the romper is not a kind of a phytotoxin and does crucify upper is not true. sent15: the pantsuit is not a chemosynthesis if the fact that the romper is not a phytotoxin but it does crucify upper is wrong. sent16: the chemistry is a phytotoxin. sent17: the romper is caprine if that the pantsuit is a kind of a sunscreen but it does not redden robe-de-chambre is not wrong.
sent3 & sent12 -> int1: the pantsuit is a kind of a sunscreen but it does not redden robe-de-chambre.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the romper is caprine.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the reflectometer is caprine but it is not a kind of a one-fifth is not right.
sent6 -> int3: if the reflectometer does laud then the fact that it is not non-caprine and it is not a one-fifth is wrong.; sent11 -> int4: if the reflectometer does not get Congridae it does laud and it does angle inferior.; sent16 -> int5: there is something such that it is a phytotoxin.; int5 & sent14 -> int6: the fact that the romper is not a phytotoxin and crucifies upper is incorrect.; sent15 & int6 -> int7: the pantsuit is not a chemosynthesis.; sent8 & int7 -> int8: the upper is non-theosophical thing that does get reversal.; int8 -> int9: something is not theosophical and does get reversal.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the reflectometer is caprine but not a one-fifth does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the pantsuit is a kind of caprine thing that does not redden robe-de-chambre if the reflectometer lauds. sent2: if the reflectometer is a sunscreen then the pantsuit is not a kind of a one-fifth. sent3: if that the upper does laud hold then the pantsuit is a kind of a sunscreen that does not redden robe-de-chambre. sent4: the reflectometer does not laud if the upper is caprine. sent5: the fact that the reflectometer is not a Hipsurus is not wrong. sent6: the fact that something is a kind of caprine thing that is not a one-fifth does not hold if the fact that it lauds hold. sent7: the reflectometer is caprine thing that is not a kind of a one-fifth if the romper is caprine. sent8: the upper is not theosophical but it gets reversal if the pantsuit is not a kind of a chemosynthesis. sent9: if the reflectometer is caprine but it is not a sunscreen then the pantsuit does laud. sent10: the upper is caprine thing that does not laud if the romper is a sunscreen. sent11: something that does not get Congridae does laud and does angle inferior. sent12: the upper lauds. sent13: the upper is not a sunscreen. sent14: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a phytotoxin that the romper is not a kind of a phytotoxin and does crucify upper is not true. sent15: the pantsuit is not a chemosynthesis if the fact that the romper is not a phytotoxin but it does crucify upper is wrong. sent16: the chemistry is a phytotoxin. sent17: the romper is caprine if that the pantsuit is a kind of a sunscreen but it does not redden robe-de-chambre is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent12 -> int1: the pantsuit is a kind of a sunscreen but it does not redden robe-de-chambre.; sent17 & int1 -> int2: the romper is caprine.; sent7 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__