that the vanadinite is a kind of a consort and does not clangor pesticide does not hold.
sent1: something does not clangor pesticide if it is not mini. sent2: if the botfly is lacrimal the man-on-a-horse is lacrimal. sent3: the botfly is not a neurasthenic. sent4: if the man-on-a-horse is runic that the rebutter is not zoic but a treatment does not hold. sent5: the man-on-a-horse is runic if it is lacrimal. sent6: the vanadinite is mini if the lookout is mini. sent7: if something is not mini then it is a consort and it does not clangor pesticide. sent8: if something is not a treatment the fact that it is not non-allogamous and it does not detail Micropterus is not right. sent9: if something is mini then the fact that it consorts and it does not clangor pesticide does not hold. sent10: if the vanadinite is not mini then it does not clangor pesticide. sent11: the vanadinite does not clangor pesticide. sent12: if the botfly is not a neurasthenic then it does not capsule exploiter and is lacrimal. sent13: that something is not a treatment is not wrong if that it is a kind of non-zoic a treatment is not correct. sent14: everything is not mini.
sent7 -> int1: if that the vanadinite is not mini hold then it does consort and it does not clangor pesticide.; sent14 -> int2: the vanadinite is not mini.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the vanadinite is a consort but it does not clangor pesticide does not hold.
sent9 -> int3: if the vanadinite is mini that it is a kind of a consort that does not clangor pesticide does not hold.; sent8 -> int4: that the rebutter is allogamous and does not detail Micropterus is not correct if it is not a kind of a treatment.; sent13 -> int5: the rebutter is not a treatment if the fact that it is non-zoic thing that is a kind of a treatment does not hold.; sent12 & sent3 -> int6: the botfly does not capsule exploiter but it is lacrimal.; int6 -> int7: the botfly is not non-lacrimal.; sent2 & int7 -> int8: the man-on-a-horse is lacrimal.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the man-on-a-horse is runic.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: that the rebutter is not zoic and is a treatment does not hold.; int5 & int10 -> int11: that the rebutter is a treatment is not true.; int4 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the rebutter is allogamous thing that does not detail Micropterus is wrong.; int12 -> int13: the fact that there is something such that the fact that it is allogamous and does not detail Micropterus is wrong hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the vanadinite is a kind of a consort and does not clangor pesticide does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not clangor pesticide if it is not mini. sent2: if the botfly is lacrimal the man-on-a-horse is lacrimal. sent3: the botfly is not a neurasthenic. sent4: if the man-on-a-horse is runic that the rebutter is not zoic but a treatment does not hold. sent5: the man-on-a-horse is runic if it is lacrimal. sent6: the vanadinite is mini if the lookout is mini. sent7: if something is not mini then it is a consort and it does not clangor pesticide. sent8: if something is not a treatment the fact that it is not non-allogamous and it does not detail Micropterus is not right. sent9: if something is mini then the fact that it consorts and it does not clangor pesticide does not hold. sent10: if the vanadinite is not mini then it does not clangor pesticide. sent11: the vanadinite does not clangor pesticide. sent12: if the botfly is not a neurasthenic then it does not capsule exploiter and is lacrimal. sent13: that something is not a treatment is not wrong if that it is a kind of non-zoic a treatment is not correct. sent14: everything is not mini. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if that the vanadinite is not mini hold then it does consort and it does not clangor pesticide.; sent14 -> int2: the vanadinite is not mini.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__