that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Pagurus and it is macroeconomic it is not extroversive is not correct.
sent1: if the zany is a Pagurus and it is macroeconomic then it is extroversive. sent2: if something is both a Gilgamesh and a Lagarostrobus it does not tease zany. sent3: if the fact that something is not non-hyperemic but a Gilgamesh is true then it does not tease hail. sent4: if a Pagurus is not non-macroeconomic that it is not extroversive is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Pagurus and it is macroeconomic then it is extroversive.
sent4 -> int1: if the zany is a kind of a Pagurus that is macroeconomic then it is not extroversive.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is a kind of a Pagurus and it is macroeconomic it is not extroversive is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the zany is a Pagurus and it is macroeconomic then it is extroversive. sent2: if something is both a Gilgamesh and a Lagarostrobus it does not tease zany. sent3: if the fact that something is not non-hyperemic but a Gilgamesh is true then it does not tease hail. sent4: if a Pagurus is not non-macroeconomic that it is not extroversive is true. sent5: there exists something such that if it is a Pagurus and it is macroeconomic then it is extroversive. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the zany is a kind of a Pagurus that is macroeconomic then it is not extroversive.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__