the glyph does not uncork Burgess.
sent1: The one-dimensionality does not bind Burgess. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a lever and is not asynchronous does not hold then the saurischian is not a kind of a cold. sent3: the fact that the saurischian is an empiricist and is a cold is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the saurischian is not a tilt hold then that the glyph is a kind of an empiricist and it is a cold is false. sent5: that if the saurischian is not a cold then the fact that that the artery is not an empiricist and is an annelid is not wrong is not correct is not wrong. sent6: something that is a cold does uncork Burgess. sent7: the Burgess does not bind one-dimensionality. sent8: the saurischian is not a languor. sent9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a lever and is not asynchronous. sent10: there exists something such that that it is a lever but not asynchronous is not true. sent11: the saurischian is non-cold if there exists something such that it is asynchronous. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cold the saurischian is a tilt. sent13: if the glyph does not uncork minibar the fact that the fact that the Burgess does not bind one-dimensionality and does uncork Burgess does not hold is right. sent14: if the bdellium is not cold it uncorks lined. sent15: the fact that the saurischian is non-cold thing that is sensory does not hold. sent16: the falcon binds one-dimensionality. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it does uncork minibar and it is not a kind of a tilt is wrong. sent18: if the fact that the Burgess does not bind one-dimensionality is not incorrect that it is sensory and does uncork minibar is not incorrect. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is not an empiricist and it is an annelid is wrong then the glyph does tilt. sent20: the artery is a clutter. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a tilt and it is sensory is not true. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that it is a lever and it is asynchronous is incorrect. sent23: the apprentice does not bind one-dimensionality. sent24: if something is an empiricist it is a cold. sent25: that the artery does not uncork minibar is correct. sent26: the Burgess is sensory.
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the saurischian is not a kind of a cold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the artery is not a kind of an empiricist and is an annelid does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not an empiricist and it is an annelid does not hold.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: that the glyph does tilt is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glyph does uncork Burgess.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the glyph is a tilt and it does uncork Burgess.; sent18 & sent7 -> int6: the Burgess is sensory thing that does uncork minibar.; int6 -> int7: that the Burgess uncorks minibar is not false.;
the glyph does uncork Burgess.
sent6 -> int8: if the glyph is a cold then it uncorks Burgess.; sent24 -> int9: the glyph is cold if it is an empiricist.;
$hypothesis$ = the glyph does not uncork Burgess. ; $context$ = sent1: The one-dimensionality does not bind Burgess. sent2: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a lever and is not asynchronous does not hold then the saurischian is not a kind of a cold. sent3: the fact that the saurischian is an empiricist and is a cold is incorrect. sent4: if the fact that the saurischian is not a tilt hold then that the glyph is a kind of an empiricist and it is a cold is false. sent5: that if the saurischian is not a cold then the fact that that the artery is not an empiricist and is an annelid is not wrong is not correct is not wrong. sent6: something that is a cold does uncork Burgess. sent7: the Burgess does not bind one-dimensionality. sent8: the saurischian is not a languor. sent9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a lever and is not asynchronous. sent10: there exists something such that that it is a lever but not asynchronous is not true. sent11: the saurischian is non-cold if there exists something such that it is asynchronous. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a kind of a cold the saurischian is a tilt. sent13: if the glyph does not uncork minibar the fact that the fact that the Burgess does not bind one-dimensionality and does uncork Burgess does not hold is right. sent14: if the bdellium is not cold it uncorks lined. sent15: the fact that the saurischian is non-cold thing that is sensory does not hold. sent16: the falcon binds one-dimensionality. sent17: there is something such that the fact that it does uncork minibar and it is not a kind of a tilt is wrong. sent18: if the fact that the Burgess does not bind one-dimensionality is not incorrect that it is sensory and does uncork minibar is not incorrect. sent19: if there exists something such that that it is not an empiricist and it is an annelid is wrong then the glyph does tilt. sent20: the artery is a clutter. sent21: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a tilt and it is sensory is not true. sent22: there exists something such that the fact that it is a lever and it is asynchronous is incorrect. sent23: the apprentice does not bind one-dimensionality. sent24: if something is an empiricist it is a cold. sent25: that the artery does not uncork minibar is correct. sent26: the Burgess is sensory. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent2 -> int1: the saurischian is not a kind of a cold.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: that the artery is not a kind of an empiricist and is an annelid does not hold.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that that it is not an empiricist and it is an annelid does not hold.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: that the glyph does tilt is not false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the glyph does uncork Burgess.; int4 & assump1 -> int5: the glyph is a tilt and it does uncork Burgess.; sent18 & sent7 -> int6: the Burgess is sensory thing that does uncork minibar.; int6 -> int7: that the Burgess uncorks minibar is not false.; __UNKNOWN__