the clavier is a kind of a Appalachians.
sent1: if the stalker does not follow then the fact that the Bruneian is not experiential and not a Appalachians is not true. sent2: something does interfere Seward if it is a stockyard. sent3: that the print does follow is not incorrect. sent4: that something is a surrey and is a pictorial if it is not impious is right. sent5: if something is a kind of a surrey then it dwarfs Education. sent6: the clavier is not experiential if that the Bruneian is not experiential and it is not a Appalachians is wrong. sent7: something is not a kind of a raspberry if it is not Semite. sent8: something is a Semite but not a raspberry if it does dwarf Education. sent9: if something is a Semite that does dwarf Education it is not a raspberry. sent10: something is a kind of a medic if it is anthropocentric. sent11: something that is not a raspberry is not experiential and does follow. sent12: everything is Semite or it dwarfs Education or both. sent13: the clavier follows if it is not non-experiential. sent14: the clavier is experiential. sent15: if the clavier is not a Appalachians the revenant does follow and it is experiential. sent16: the Bruneian does follow if the stalker does dwarf Education. sent17: if the clavier is not experiential then the baggageman is experiential. sent18: if something follows it is a Appalachians. sent19: something is not a raspberry but it is experiential if it is a surrey. sent20: if something that is Semite is not a kind of a raspberry then the clavier is not a kind of a Appalachians.
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the clavier follows.; sent18 -> int2: the clavier is a Appalachians if it follows.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
that the clavier is not Appalachians is not incorrect.
sent11 -> int3: if the Bruneian is not a kind of a raspberry then it is not experiential and it follows.; sent9 -> int4: if the Bruneian is a Semite and it does dwarf Education then it is not a raspberry.;
$hypothesis$ = the clavier is a kind of a Appalachians. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stalker does not follow then the fact that the Bruneian is not experiential and not a Appalachians is not true. sent2: something does interfere Seward if it is a stockyard. sent3: that the print does follow is not incorrect. sent4: that something is a surrey and is a pictorial if it is not impious is right. sent5: if something is a kind of a surrey then it dwarfs Education. sent6: the clavier is not experiential if that the Bruneian is not experiential and it is not a Appalachians is wrong. sent7: something is not a kind of a raspberry if it is not Semite. sent8: something is a Semite but not a raspberry if it does dwarf Education. sent9: if something is a Semite that does dwarf Education it is not a raspberry. sent10: something is a kind of a medic if it is anthropocentric. sent11: something that is not a raspberry is not experiential and does follow. sent12: everything is Semite or it dwarfs Education or both. sent13: the clavier follows if it is not non-experiential. sent14: the clavier is experiential. sent15: if the clavier is not a Appalachians the revenant does follow and it is experiential. sent16: the Bruneian does follow if the stalker does dwarf Education. sent17: if the clavier is not experiential then the baggageman is experiential. sent18: if something follows it is a Appalachians. sent19: something is not a raspberry but it is experiential if it is a surrey. sent20: if something that is Semite is not a kind of a raspberry then the clavier is not a kind of a Appalachians. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent14 -> int1: the clavier follows.; sent18 -> int2: the clavier is a Appalachians if it follows.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__