that the entrenchment is both an appeasement and not a proscenium is wrong.
sent1: the teakettle is a Glaswegian. sent2: if something is not a kind of a psalmody it does feed and is flaky. sent3: if that that the Zinfandel is a kind of non-Glaswegian thing that does retouch womanhood is incorrect hold the teakettle does not unseal. sent4: if there are outing things that the Zinfandel does unseal and is a kind of a Namtar hold. sent5: if the Zinfandel is a kind of a proscenium then the entrenchment is an appeasement and is not a kind of a proscenium. sent6: if something is a feeding and it is flaky then the teakettle outs. sent7: if the entrenchment retouches womanhood it is a proscenium. sent8: the Pepto-bismal is not a psalmody if there exists something such that that it is corrupting and it is a kind of a psalmody is incorrect. sent9: the entrenchment is an appeasement if the Zinfandel is a proscenium. sent10: if the garnet is both not Turkmen and welcoming then the ruddle is not a Turkmen. sent11: the garnet is a kind of non-Turkmen thing that welcomes. sent12: something is a proscenium if it does retouch womanhood. sent13: if the ruddle is not a kind of a Turkmen that it is a kind of corrupting a psalmody is not right. sent14: the teakettle does unseal if the Pepto-bismal unseal. sent15: the fact that the Pepto-bismal does unseal is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Zinfandel is a kind of non-Glaswegian thing that retouches womanhood is not correct.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the teakettle does not unseal.; sent14 & sent15 -> int2: the teakettle does unseal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Zinfandel is not a kind of a Glaswegian and does retouch womanhood.; int4 -> int5: the Zinfandel does retouch womanhood.; sent12 -> int6: if that the Zinfandel retouches womanhood is not wrong then it is a proscenium.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Zinfandel is a kind of a proscenium.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
that the entrenchment is a kind of an appeasement that is not a proscenium is false.
sent2 -> int8: if the Pepto-bismal is not a psalmody it does feed and is flaky.; sent10 & sent11 -> int9: the fact that the ruddle is not Turkmen is not wrong.; sent13 & int9 -> int10: that the ruddle is a kind of corrupting thing that is a kind of a psalmody does not hold.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that that it is corrupting and a psalmody does not hold.; int11 & sent8 -> int12: the Pepto-bismal is not a psalmody.; int8 & int12 -> int13: the Pepto-bismal does feed and it is flaky.; int13 -> int14: something feeds and it is flaky.; int14 & sent6 -> int15: the fact that the teakettle is not outing is not right.; int15 -> int16: something does out.; int16 & sent4 -> int17: the Zinfandel does unseal and it is a Namtar.; int17 -> int18: the Zinfandel does unseal.; int18 -> int19: there is something such that it does unseal.;
$hypothesis$ = that the entrenchment is both an appeasement and not a proscenium is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the teakettle is a Glaswegian. sent2: if something is not a kind of a psalmody it does feed and is flaky. sent3: if that that the Zinfandel is a kind of non-Glaswegian thing that does retouch womanhood is incorrect hold the teakettle does not unseal. sent4: if there are outing things that the Zinfandel does unseal and is a kind of a Namtar hold. sent5: if the Zinfandel is a kind of a proscenium then the entrenchment is an appeasement and is not a kind of a proscenium. sent6: if something is a feeding and it is flaky then the teakettle outs. sent7: if the entrenchment retouches womanhood it is a proscenium. sent8: the Pepto-bismal is not a psalmody if there exists something such that that it is corrupting and it is a kind of a psalmody is incorrect. sent9: the entrenchment is an appeasement if the Zinfandel is a proscenium. sent10: if the garnet is both not Turkmen and welcoming then the ruddle is not a Turkmen. sent11: the garnet is a kind of non-Turkmen thing that welcomes. sent12: something is a proscenium if it does retouch womanhood. sent13: if the ruddle is not a kind of a Turkmen that it is a kind of corrupting a psalmody is not right. sent14: the teakettle does unseal if the Pepto-bismal unseal. sent15: the fact that the Pepto-bismal does unseal is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the Zinfandel is a kind of non-Glaswegian thing that retouches womanhood is not correct.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the teakettle does not unseal.; sent14 & sent15 -> int2: the teakettle does unseal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Zinfandel is not a kind of a Glaswegian and does retouch womanhood.; int4 -> int5: the Zinfandel does retouch womanhood.; sent12 -> int6: if that the Zinfandel retouches womanhood is not wrong then it is a proscenium.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the Zinfandel is a kind of a proscenium.; int7 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__