the totem is a Romneya.
sent1: there exists something such that that it is economics and does not commiserate wayside is not right. sent2: that the supinator is a kind of an additive and it is a skidpan is false. sent3: the fact that the supinator is fermentable and it is a marlin does not hold. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is economics and it does not commiserate wayside is not correct then the supinator is not a oxidation-reduction. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a Veneto and it is additive the examiner is a skidpan. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is either not a Osteoglossidae or nonproprietary or both does not hold the supinator is Turkic. sent7: the fact that the totem is both not a Osteoglossidae and nonproprietary does not hold if the nogging is not Turkic. sent8: if the examiner is a kind of a skidpan that is a marlin the nogging is not Turkic. sent9: the examiner is a kind of a marlin. sent10: the totem is beneficent. sent11: the totem is not a Romneya if that it is not a Osteoglossidae and it is nonproprietary is not correct. sent12: the fact that the totem is not a Osteoglossidae and is a marlin does not hold if the examiner is not a skidpan. sent13: the tidemark is a Osteoglossidae. sent14: the fact that the nogging is not a Osteoglossidae or it is nonproprietary or both is incorrect if the totem is beneficent. sent15: if something that is a marlin is Turkic it is not a kind of a skidpan. sent16: that something does not descend but it is a splurge is incorrect if it is a kind of a Veneto. sent17: the supinator is a kind of an additive. sent18: the supinator is a Veneto. sent19: if the supinator is not a oxidation-reduction then the fact that it is a kind of a marlin and it is a Romneya is not wrong. sent20: the examiner is a Romneya.
sent18 & sent17 -> int1: the supinator is a Veneto and it is an additive.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a Veneto and it is an additive.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the examiner is a skidpan.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the examiner is a skidpan and is a marlin.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the nogging is not Turkic.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the totem is not a Osteoglossidae but it is nonproprietary is false.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the examiner does not descend but it splurges does not hold.
sent16 -> int7: the fact that that the examiner does not descend and is a splurge is not correct is true if it is a Veneto.; sent15 -> int8: the supinator is not a skidpan if it is a marlin but not non-Turkic.; sent1 & sent4 -> int9: the supinator is not a oxidation-reduction.; sent19 & int9 -> int10: the supinator is a kind of a marlin that is a kind of a Romneya.; int10 -> int11: the supinator is a kind of a marlin.; sent14 & sent10 -> int12: that the nogging is not a kind of a Osteoglossidae or it is nonproprietary or both is not true.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is not a Osteoglossidae and/or it is not proprietary does not hold.; int13 & sent6 -> int14: the supinator is Turkic.; int11 & int14 -> int15: the supinator is a marlin and Turkic.; int8 & int15 -> int16: the supinator is not a skidpan.; int16 -> int17: there exists something such that it is not a skidpan.;
$hypothesis$ = the totem is a Romneya. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that that it is economics and does not commiserate wayside is not right. sent2: that the supinator is a kind of an additive and it is a skidpan is false. sent3: the fact that the supinator is fermentable and it is a marlin does not hold. sent4: if there is something such that the fact that it is economics and it does not commiserate wayside is not correct then the supinator is not a oxidation-reduction. sent5: if there exists something such that it is a Veneto and it is additive the examiner is a skidpan. sent6: if there is something such that the fact that it is either not a Osteoglossidae or nonproprietary or both does not hold the supinator is Turkic. sent7: the fact that the totem is both not a Osteoglossidae and nonproprietary does not hold if the nogging is not Turkic. sent8: if the examiner is a kind of a skidpan that is a marlin the nogging is not Turkic. sent9: the examiner is a kind of a marlin. sent10: the totem is beneficent. sent11: the totem is not a Romneya if that it is not a Osteoglossidae and it is nonproprietary is not correct. sent12: the fact that the totem is not a Osteoglossidae and is a marlin does not hold if the examiner is not a skidpan. sent13: the tidemark is a Osteoglossidae. sent14: the fact that the nogging is not a Osteoglossidae or it is nonproprietary or both is incorrect if the totem is beneficent. sent15: if something that is a marlin is Turkic it is not a kind of a skidpan. sent16: that something does not descend but it is a splurge is incorrect if it is a kind of a Veneto. sent17: the supinator is a kind of an additive. sent18: the supinator is a Veneto. sent19: if the supinator is not a oxidation-reduction then the fact that it is a kind of a marlin and it is a Romneya is not wrong. sent20: the examiner is a Romneya. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent17 -> int1: the supinator is a Veneto and it is an additive.; int1 -> int2: something is a kind of a Veneto and it is an additive.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: the examiner is a skidpan.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the examiner is a skidpan and is a marlin.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the nogging is not Turkic.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the totem is not a Osteoglossidae but it is nonproprietary is false.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__