the comforting Milanese occurs but the pancreaticness does not occur.
sent1: the drawing restraint does not occur. sent2: that the slinking does not occur is caused by that both the pancreaticness and the cleistogamousness occurs. sent3: if the reflectorizing equality does not occur then the slinking does not occur and the cleistogamousness does not occur. sent4: the reflectorizing equality happens. sent5: that the fact that both the comforting Milanese and the non-pancreaticness occurs is wrong if the cleistogamousness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: both the fleeing and the coating occurs. sent7: the comforting Milanese happens. sent8: the drawing machete does not occur if the drawing restraint does not occur. sent9: the reflectorizing equality occurs if that the slinking does not occur is correct. sent10: the inactiveness is prevented by the non-Scythianness. sent11: the drawing whirl occurs and the convulsion does not occur. sent12: the weed does not occur. sent13: the reflectorizing equality and the drawing machete occurs if the slinking does not occur. sent14: the pelter does not occur. sent15: the snap occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pancreaticness happens.; sent8 & sent1 -> int1: the drawing machete does not occur.;
that that both the comforting Milanese and the non-pancreaticness occurs hold is false.
$hypothesis$ = the comforting Milanese occurs but the pancreaticness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the drawing restraint does not occur. sent2: that the slinking does not occur is caused by that both the pancreaticness and the cleistogamousness occurs. sent3: if the reflectorizing equality does not occur then the slinking does not occur and the cleistogamousness does not occur. sent4: the reflectorizing equality happens. sent5: that the fact that both the comforting Milanese and the non-pancreaticness occurs is wrong if the cleistogamousness does not occur is not wrong. sent6: both the fleeing and the coating occurs. sent7: the comforting Milanese happens. sent8: the drawing machete does not occur if the drawing restraint does not occur. sent9: the reflectorizing equality occurs if that the slinking does not occur is correct. sent10: the inactiveness is prevented by the non-Scythianness. sent11: the drawing whirl occurs and the convulsion does not occur. sent12: the weed does not occur. sent13: the reflectorizing equality and the drawing machete occurs if the slinking does not occur. sent14: the pelter does not occur. sent15: the snap occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pancreaticness happens.; sent8 & sent1 -> int1: the drawing machete does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__