the wishing occurs and the solfege happens.
sent1: the dismount does not occur. sent2: if the persuasiveness does not occur the rewarding does not occur. sent3: the descent occurs if the dabbling occurs. sent4: the wavering occurs. sent5: the wishing happens. sent6: that the wishing does not occur but the sentimentalising masted happens is not right if the dismount does not occur. sent7: if the terrestrialness occurs then that the drumming and the non-remediableness occurs is false. sent8: if that that the drumming happens but the remediableness does not occur does not hold is not wrong the drumming does not occur. sent9: that that the solfege does not occur but the simian happens is brought about by that the drumming does not occur is correct. sent10: that the hemalness occurs is not wrong. sent11: that the solfege does not occur is prevented by that the rewarding does not occur and the wavering occurs. sent12: the dabbling happens if the persuasiveness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the persuasiveness occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the dabbling happens.;
the fact that the wish and the solfege happens is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the wishing occurs and the solfege happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the dismount does not occur. sent2: if the persuasiveness does not occur the rewarding does not occur. sent3: the descent occurs if the dabbling occurs. sent4: the wavering occurs. sent5: the wishing happens. sent6: that the wishing does not occur but the sentimentalising masted happens is not right if the dismount does not occur. sent7: if the terrestrialness occurs then that the drumming and the non-remediableness occurs is false. sent8: if that that the drumming happens but the remediableness does not occur does not hold is not wrong the drumming does not occur. sent9: that that the solfege does not occur but the simian happens is brought about by that the drumming does not occur is correct. sent10: that the hemalness occurs is not wrong. sent11: that the solfege does not occur is prevented by that the rewarding does not occur and the wavering occurs. sent12: the dabbling happens if the persuasiveness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the persuasiveness occurs.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the dabbling happens.; __UNKNOWN__