that there exists something such that if it adheres the fact that it is not a duck and/or is a kind of a reverence is wrong is false.
sent1: if something is a razbliuto the fact that it does not destain collagen or it is a apatosaur or both is not right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a about-face the fact that that it either is not a kind of a glucagon or is a gloss or both is not false is incorrect. sent3: either the drugstore does not duck or it is a kind of a reverence or both if it adheres. sent4: if something is nonadsorbent then the fact that it is not differentiable or it backhands or both is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a heliport hold then that it does not reimburse aberrant and/or it is productive does not hold. sent6: if the drugstore does adhere then it is a kind of a duck. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a telegraphy that either it is not tortious or it does rustle Agamemnon or both is incorrect is right. sent8: there is something such that if it does adhere it does not reverence. sent9: there is something such that if it adheres then it either is not a kind of a duck or is a reverence or both. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does adhere is correct it does duck. sent11: that either the jetsam is not a geometer or it deems or both is not right if it is a duck. sent12: the fact that the drugstore is not a kind of a duck and/or it is a kind of a reverence is not correct if it does adhere. sent13: there is something such that if it does adhere then the fact that either it ducks or it does reverence or both is not true.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is nonadsorbent the fact that it is not differentiable and/or it does backhand is false.
sent4 -> int1: if the exodontist is nonadsorbent the fact that it is not differentiable and/or it backhands is false.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it adheres the fact that it is not a duck and/or is a kind of a reverence is wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a razbliuto the fact that it does not destain collagen or it is a apatosaur or both is not right. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a about-face the fact that that it either is not a kind of a glucagon or is a gloss or both is not false is incorrect. sent3: either the drugstore does not duck or it is a kind of a reverence or both if it adheres. sent4: if something is nonadsorbent then the fact that it is not differentiable or it backhands or both is incorrect. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a heliport hold then that it does not reimburse aberrant and/or it is productive does not hold. sent6: if the drugstore does adhere then it is a kind of a duck. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it is a telegraphy that either it is not tortious or it does rustle Agamemnon or both is incorrect is right. sent8: there is something such that if it does adhere it does not reverence. sent9: there is something such that if it adheres then it either is not a kind of a duck or is a reverence or both. sent10: there exists something such that if that it does adhere is correct it does duck. sent11: that either the jetsam is not a geometer or it deems or both is not right if it is a duck. sent12: the fact that the drugstore is not a kind of a duck and/or it is a kind of a reverence is not correct if it does adhere. sent13: there is something such that if it does adhere then the fact that either it ducks or it does reverence or both is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__