the fact that there is something such that if it is not vacuolate the fact that it is a Hippocampus but not non-autogamous is not right is false.
sent1: the fact that the automatism is a clock and it is a pulse does not hold if it does not bog Freudian. sent2: there is something such that if it is not vacuolate then it is a kind of a Hippocampus and it is autogamous. sent3: the fact that the emetic is salty and it is a ICU is incorrect if it is not a Elam. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a fingerstall then the fact that it is restless and is not non-high-rise is false. sent5: the fact that something is not non-vacuolate but a fitter is not true if it does not bog indolence. sent6: if something does not bog referent then the fact that it is a bottomlessness and a Wister is false. sent7: that the automatism is a Hippocampus and it is autogamous is false if it is not vacuolate. sent8: if the automatism is not a fingerstall then it is vacuolate and it is a prochlorperazine. sent9: if the automatism is not a bottomlessness that it is a Hippocampus and it clocks is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a clock then it is a kind of high-rise thing that winnows mid-off.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it does not bog referent that it is a bottomlessness and a Wister is wrong.
sent6 -> int1: that the plainclothesman is a kind of a bottomlessness and is a Wister does not hold if it does not bog referent.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not vacuolate the fact that it is a Hippocampus but not non-autogamous is not right is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the automatism is a clock and it is a pulse does not hold if it does not bog Freudian. sent2: there is something such that if it is not vacuolate then it is a kind of a Hippocampus and it is autogamous. sent3: the fact that the emetic is salty and it is a ICU is incorrect if it is not a Elam. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a fingerstall then the fact that it is restless and is not non-high-rise is false. sent5: the fact that something is not non-vacuolate but a fitter is not true if it does not bog indolence. sent6: if something does not bog referent then the fact that it is a bottomlessness and a Wister is false. sent7: that the automatism is a Hippocampus and it is autogamous is false if it is not vacuolate. sent8: if the automatism is not a fingerstall then it is vacuolate and it is a prochlorperazine. sent9: if the automatism is not a bottomlessness that it is a Hippocampus and it clocks is not correct. sent10: there exists something such that if it is not a clock then it is a kind of high-rise thing that winnows mid-off. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__