that that the hyssop either does not ask Shakespearian or is not topical or both is correct does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that something is not branchless but it does ask Whitehall is not true it is not a Jurassic. sent2: if that the semitrailer is not topical is right then the hyssop either does not ask Shakespearian or is not topical or both. sent3: if something is a barilla but it is not invitational then it is not a kind of a Jurassic. sent4: the fact that the euphonium is not Jurassic is wrong if there exists something such that that it asks Whitehall and is not branchless is false. sent5: the hyssop is not invitational. sent6: if something that does ask Shakespearian is not a Jurassic it is not topical. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does ask Whitehall and is not branchless is not right. sent8: that something is a kind of branchy thing that asks Whitehall is wrong if it is a crayon. sent9: the semitrailer is non-topical if that that the euphonium is a barilla but it is not invitational is not incorrect does not hold. sent10: the hyssop either does not ask Shakespearian or is topical or both if the semitrailer is topical. sent11: if the fact that that the galingale is a abrachia but it does not ask Vespertilionidae is correct is not right it is lower-class. sent12: the hyssop is not a kind of a barilla or is not topical or both if the euphonium is not topical. sent13: if that the WIMP is not a nay or it is androgenetic or both does not hold then the semitrailer crayons. sent14: the fact that the WIMP is not a nay or androgenetic or both is not true if the galingale is lower-class. sent15: if the galingale is not a paleoethnography then that it is a kind of a abrachia and it does not ask Vespertilionidae is wrong.
sent3 -> int1: if the euphonium is both a barilla and non-invitational it is not a Jurassic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the euphonium is a barilla but it is not invitational.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the euphonium is not a kind of a Jurassic.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the euphonium is Jurassic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the euphonium is a kind of a barilla but it is not invitational is not correct.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the semitrailer is not topical.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
that the hyssop does not ask Shakespearian and/or it is not topical is not true.
sent1 -> int7: the semitrailer is not a Jurassic if that it is a kind of non-branchless thing that does ask Whitehall is wrong.; sent8 -> int8: if the semitrailer does crayon then the fact that the fact that it is non-branchless thing that does ask Whitehall is right is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = that that the hyssop either does not ask Shakespearian or is not topical or both is correct does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not branchless but it does ask Whitehall is not true it is not a Jurassic. sent2: if that the semitrailer is not topical is right then the hyssop either does not ask Shakespearian or is not topical or both. sent3: if something is a barilla but it is not invitational then it is not a kind of a Jurassic. sent4: the fact that the euphonium is not Jurassic is wrong if there exists something such that that it asks Whitehall and is not branchless is false. sent5: the hyssop is not invitational. sent6: if something that does ask Shakespearian is not a Jurassic it is not topical. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it does ask Whitehall and is not branchless is not right. sent8: that something is a kind of branchy thing that asks Whitehall is wrong if it is a crayon. sent9: the semitrailer is non-topical if that that the euphonium is a barilla but it is not invitational is not incorrect does not hold. sent10: the hyssop either does not ask Shakespearian or is topical or both if the semitrailer is topical. sent11: if the fact that that the galingale is a abrachia but it does not ask Vespertilionidae is correct is not right it is lower-class. sent12: the hyssop is not a kind of a barilla or is not topical or both if the euphonium is not topical. sent13: if that the WIMP is not a nay or it is androgenetic or both does not hold then the semitrailer crayons. sent14: the fact that the WIMP is not a nay or androgenetic or both is not true if the galingale is lower-class. sent15: if the galingale is not a paleoethnography then that it is a kind of a abrachia and it does not ask Vespertilionidae is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the euphonium is both a barilla and non-invitational it is not a Jurassic.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the euphonium is a barilla but it is not invitational.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the euphonium is not a kind of a Jurassic.; sent7 & sent4 -> int3: the euphonium is Jurassic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the euphonium is a kind of a barilla but it is not invitational is not correct.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the semitrailer is not topical.; int6 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__