the unintelligibleness occurs and/or the associating does not occur if the sinkableness occurs.
sent1: if the sinkableness occurs the fact that the parenteralness but not the waxing happens does not hold. sent2: if the Best happens the excreting sawhorse occurs. sent3: the Best occurs if the fact that the parenteralness does not occur and the waxing does not occur is not true. sent4: the Best is brought about by the parenteralness. sent5: the fact that the parenteralness does not occur and the waxing does not occur is not right if the sinkableness happens. sent6: the rinsing occurs. sent7: that the parenteralness occurs and the waxing does not occur is false. sent8: if either the journalisticness happens or the aposiopeticness happens or both the larvalness does not occur. sent9: that the stirring does not occur is correct if the rousing and/or the excreting convention happens. sent10: the unintelligibleness occurs or the associating does not occur or both if the larvalness does not occur. sent11: if the excreting sawhorse happens then the aposiopeticness occurs. sent12: the unintelligibleness happens or the associating happens or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sinkableness happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the parenteralness does not occur and the waxing does not occur is not right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Best occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the excreting sawhorse occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the aposiopeticness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the journalisticness or the aposiopeticness or both happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the larvalness does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the unintelligibleness occurs or the associate does not occur or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the unintelligibleness occurs and/or the associating does not occur if the sinkableness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sinkableness occurs the fact that the parenteralness but not the waxing happens does not hold. sent2: if the Best happens the excreting sawhorse occurs. sent3: the Best occurs if the fact that the parenteralness does not occur and the waxing does not occur is not true. sent4: the Best is brought about by the parenteralness. sent5: the fact that the parenteralness does not occur and the waxing does not occur is not right if the sinkableness happens. sent6: the rinsing occurs. sent7: that the parenteralness occurs and the waxing does not occur is false. sent8: if either the journalisticness happens or the aposiopeticness happens or both the larvalness does not occur. sent9: that the stirring does not occur is correct if the rousing and/or the excreting convention happens. sent10: the unintelligibleness occurs or the associating does not occur or both if the larvalness does not occur. sent11: if the excreting sawhorse happens then the aposiopeticness occurs. sent12: the unintelligibleness happens or the associating happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sinkableness happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the parenteralness does not occur and the waxing does not occur is not right.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the Best occurs.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the excreting sawhorse occurs.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the aposiopeticness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the journalisticness or the aposiopeticness or both happens.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the larvalness does not occur.; int6 & sent10 -> int7: the unintelligibleness occurs or the associate does not occur or both.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__