if the oligarchicness occurs then the fact that the coifing and the non-angularness occurs is not true.
sent1: if the stick does not occur then that the coifing happens and the angularness occurs is not right. sent2: the non-oligarchicness is brought about by that the pyloricness and/or the sticking occurs. sent3: both the coif and the non-angularness happens if the sticking does not occur. sent4: that the coifing and the angularness occurs is false. sent5: the coif but not the angularness happens. sent6: if the oligarchicness happens the coif happens and the angularness does not occur. sent7: if the oligarchicness occurs that the coifing and the angularness occurs is not true. sent8: the griping astigmatism happens. sent9: the fact that the regurgitation occurs but the bargaining railroading does not occur is false if the seaming overgarment does not occur. sent10: the distraction does not occur.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the oligarchicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sticking occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the pyloricness happens or the stick occurs or both.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the oligarchicness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stick does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = if the oligarchicness occurs then the fact that the coifing and the non-angularness occurs is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: if the stick does not occur then that the coifing happens and the angularness occurs is not right. sent2: the non-oligarchicness is brought about by that the pyloricness and/or the sticking occurs. sent3: both the coif and the non-angularness happens if the sticking does not occur. sent4: that the coifing and the angularness occurs is false. sent5: the coif but not the angularness happens. sent6: if the oligarchicness happens the coif happens and the angularness does not occur. sent7: if the oligarchicness occurs that the coifing and the angularness occurs is not true. sent8: the griping astigmatism happens. sent9: the fact that the regurgitation occurs but the bargaining railroading does not occur is false if the seaming overgarment does not occur. sent10: the distraction does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the oligarchicness occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sticking occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the pyloricness happens or the stick occurs or both.; sent2 & int1 -> int2: the oligarchicness does not occur.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the stick does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__