the bitthead is stabling and is eremitic.
sent1: something does not stable if the fact that it is not a Assamese and it stable is not true. sent2: if the bitthead is a langsyne the hybridization is Assamese. sent3: if the fact that the Western is a amputator is not incorrect the maltha is both a protohippus and not paintable. sent4: if the maltha is a langsyne but it is not pyrogenic then the hybridization is not a langsyne. sent5: the fact that the hybridization is not a pisser is correct. sent6: the hybridization is eremitic. sent7: that the hybridization is a langsyne that does not whang allocator does not hold. sent8: the bitthead is eremitic if the hybridization is a langsyne. sent9: the hybridization is not a protohippus. sent10: the hybridization is not a Assamese. sent11: if the numbat does disrespect COBOL the fact that the Western is a amputator hold. sent12: the bitthead is eremitic. sent13: the Western is a amputator if the numbat is a titillation. sent14: the lady is a pisser if there is something such that the fact that it is not a langsyne and it does not stable is incorrect. sent15: if the bitthead is not a stabling then the fact that it is a kind of a pisser and it does not disrespect Bunyaviridae does not hold. sent16: that the physicist is distant and it stables does not hold if that it does not lap biosynthesis is not wrong. sent17: there is something such that it does disrespect COBOL. sent18: the bitthead is a langsyne if that it is a kind of a pisser and does not disrespect Bunyaviridae is false. sent19: something is a langsyne that is not pyrogenic if the fact that it is a kind of a protohippus is not wrong. sent20: if something disrespects COBOL then the numbat disrespects COBOL and/or is a titillation.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitthead is not a stabling.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bitthead is a kind of a pisser that does not disrespect Bunyaviridae is false.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the bitthead is a langsyne.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the hybridization is a kind of a Assamese.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the bitthead does stable.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bitthead is a stabling and it is eremitic does not hold.
sent1 -> int6: if the fact that the hybridization is a kind of non-Assamese a stabling is not right it is not a stabling.; sent19 -> int7: the maltha is a kind of a langsyne but it is not pyrogenic if the fact that it is a protohippus hold.; sent17 & sent20 -> int8: the numbat does disrespect COBOL and/or it is a titillation.; int8 & sent11 & sent13 -> int9: the Western is a amputator.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the maltha is both a protohippus and not paintable.; int10 -> int11: the maltha is a protohippus.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the maltha is both a langsyne and not pyrogenic.; sent4 & int12 -> int13: the hybridization is not a langsyne.;
$hypothesis$ = the bitthead is stabling and is eremitic. ; $context$ = sent1: something does not stable if the fact that it is not a Assamese and it stable is not true. sent2: if the bitthead is a langsyne the hybridization is Assamese. sent3: if the fact that the Western is a amputator is not incorrect the maltha is both a protohippus and not paintable. sent4: if the maltha is a langsyne but it is not pyrogenic then the hybridization is not a langsyne. sent5: the fact that the hybridization is not a pisser is correct. sent6: the hybridization is eremitic. sent7: that the hybridization is a langsyne that does not whang allocator does not hold. sent8: the bitthead is eremitic if the hybridization is a langsyne. sent9: the hybridization is not a protohippus. sent10: the hybridization is not a Assamese. sent11: if the numbat does disrespect COBOL the fact that the Western is a amputator hold. sent12: the bitthead is eremitic. sent13: the Western is a amputator if the numbat is a titillation. sent14: the lady is a pisser if there is something such that the fact that it is not a langsyne and it does not stable is incorrect. sent15: if the bitthead is not a stabling then the fact that it is a kind of a pisser and it does not disrespect Bunyaviridae does not hold. sent16: that the physicist is distant and it stables does not hold if that it does not lap biosynthesis is not wrong. sent17: there is something such that it does disrespect COBOL. sent18: the bitthead is a langsyne if that it is a kind of a pisser and does not disrespect Bunyaviridae is false. sent19: something is a langsyne that is not pyrogenic if the fact that it is a kind of a protohippus is not wrong. sent20: if something disrespects COBOL then the numbat disrespects COBOL and/or is a titillation. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the bitthead is not a stabling.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the bitthead is a kind of a pisser that does not disrespect Bunyaviridae is false.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the bitthead is a langsyne.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the hybridization is a kind of a Assamese.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the bitthead does stable.; int5 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__