the demising melanoblast happens.
sent1: both the granulation and the true-falseness happens. sent2: the demising diviner does not occur. sent3: that the demising witch-hunter and the demising melanoblast occurs triggers the woodyness. sent4: that the demising go-slow does not occur is prevented by that the demising diviner does not occur and the granulation occurs. sent5: that that both the non-metastableness and the electromagneticness happens prevents that the demising witch-hunter does not occur hold. sent6: the non-metastableness and the electromagneticness happens. sent7: if the nonwoodiness does not occur then the demising go-slow does not occur. sent8: that the nonwoodiness but not the demising witch-hunter occurs triggers that the demising melanoblast occurs.
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the demising witch-hunter occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demising melanoblast occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the demising witch-hunter happens and the demising melanoblast happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the nonwoodiness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the demising go-slow does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the fact that the granulation occurs is correct.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: not the demising diviner but the granulation occurs.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the demising go-slow occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
the demising melanoblast happens.
$hypothesis$ = the demising melanoblast happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the granulation and the true-falseness happens. sent2: the demising diviner does not occur. sent3: that the demising witch-hunter and the demising melanoblast occurs triggers the woodyness. sent4: that the demising go-slow does not occur is prevented by that the demising diviner does not occur and the granulation occurs. sent5: that that both the non-metastableness and the electromagneticness happens prevents that the demising witch-hunter does not occur hold. sent6: the non-metastableness and the electromagneticness happens. sent7: if the nonwoodiness does not occur then the demising go-slow does not occur. sent8: that the nonwoodiness but not the demising witch-hunter occurs triggers that the demising melanoblast occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent6 -> int1: the demising witch-hunter occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the demising melanoblast occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the demising witch-hunter happens and the demising melanoblast happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the nonwoodiness does not occur.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the demising go-slow does not occur.; sent1 -> int5: the fact that the granulation occurs is correct.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: not the demising diviner but the granulation occurs.; sent4 & int6 -> int7: the demising go-slow occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__