the read is nonintellectual.
sent1: the read does browse wide-body and it is a vertebrate. sent2: the read does not disunify identification. sent3: the internationalist is a kind of a vertebrate. sent4: if the teacher is a kind of a dazzling then the read is nonintellectual. sent5: if something is nonintellectual then it does disunify stamen. sent6: the fact that the organs is a kind of non-dermatologic a vertebrate is not true if something is not an untouchable. sent7: if that something is not dermatologic but it is vertebrate is false then that it is not a kind of a vertebrate is correct. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the read is not a mount and not a tadalafil is not incorrect is not correct then the teacher is not an untouchable. sent9: that the read is both not a mount and not a tadalafil is wrong if it does not disunify identification. sent10: the percussionist is a kind of a tadalafil and it dazzles. sent11: the teacher is nonintellectual. sent12: the read is vertebrate. sent13: the teacher is a dazzling that is a vertebrate. sent14: something disunifies teacher and is a kind of a dazzling if it is not a vertebrate.
sent13 -> int1: the teacher is a dazzling.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the organs disunifies teacher and does disunify stamen.
sent14 -> int2: the organs does disunify teacher and is a dazzling if it is not a vertebrate.; sent7 -> int3: if that the organs is not dermatologic but it is vertebrate does not hold then it is not a vertebrate.; sent9 & sent2 -> int4: that the read is not a mount and it is not a tadalafil does not hold.; sent8 & int4 -> int5: the teacher is not an untouchable.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that the fact that it is not an untouchable is true.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: that the organs is not dermatologic but it is vertebrate is wrong.; int3 & int7 -> int8: the organs is not a kind of a vertebrate.; int2 & int8 -> int9: the organs disunifies teacher and dazzles.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the organs disunifies teacher hold.; sent5 -> int11: the organs disunifies stamen if it is nonintellectual.;
$hypothesis$ = the read is nonintellectual. ; $context$ = sent1: the read does browse wide-body and it is a vertebrate. sent2: the read does not disunify identification. sent3: the internationalist is a kind of a vertebrate. sent4: if the teacher is a kind of a dazzling then the read is nonintellectual. sent5: if something is nonintellectual then it does disunify stamen. sent6: the fact that the organs is a kind of non-dermatologic a vertebrate is not true if something is not an untouchable. sent7: if that something is not dermatologic but it is vertebrate is false then that it is not a kind of a vertebrate is correct. sent8: if the fact that the fact that the read is not a mount and not a tadalafil is not incorrect is not correct then the teacher is not an untouchable. sent9: that the read is both not a mount and not a tadalafil is wrong if it does not disunify identification. sent10: the percussionist is a kind of a tadalafil and it dazzles. sent11: the teacher is nonintellectual. sent12: the read is vertebrate. sent13: the teacher is a dazzling that is a vertebrate. sent14: something disunifies teacher and is a kind of a dazzling if it is not a vertebrate. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the teacher is a dazzling.; sent4 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__