the bourguignon does not talk Mauritanian.
sent1: if the fact that the pseudoscorpion is a Opel and not a broadcloth is false the stove is not therapeutics. sent2: if something is a Perdix and/or it is a synchrotron then it does not talk Mauritanian. sent3: if the stove is a Perdix but it is not a synchrotron the pseudoscorpion is an omnibus. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not a Fulgoridae and it is an omnibus does not hold the bourguignon is a kind of a Perdix. sent5: if the fact that something is a Fulgoridae hold then it does talk Mauritanian. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a Fulgoridae then the bourguignon is a Perdix. sent7: something is not a Fulgoridae and is an omnibus. sent8: something is not an urgency if it either is not a kind of an urgency or does not hydrolyze or both. sent9: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Fulgoridae that is an omnibus is not correct. sent10: there is something such that it is not an urgency. sent11: if something is not an urgency then it is a kind of bladdery thing that does crank aleph-null. sent12: the stove is not therapeutics if the pseudoscorpion is a broadcloth. sent13: that that the pseudoscorpion is a Opel but it is not a broadcloth is correct is not right. sent14: something is a Perdix that is not a synchrotron if it is bladdery. sent15: if that the stove is non-therapeutics hold the fact that the gladiator is both a Fulgoridae and an omnibus is incorrect. sent16: if something is not a kind of a Fulgoridae then the fact that it is a miner that does not outweigh is false. sent17: the stove talks Mauritanian and is not a synchrotron if it is bladdery. sent18: the fact that the stove is a kind of therapeutics thing that is not a kind of a broadcloth is incorrect. sent19: if the stove talks Mauritanian and is not a synchrotron then it is not a kind of a Perdix. sent20: something does not talk Mauritanian if that it is a synchrotron is not false. sent21: that the pseudoscorpion is a kind of non-therapeutics thing that is not an omnibus does not hold if the stove is not a Perdix. sent22: the fact that the bourguignon is a Fulgoridae is not incorrect if the fact that the pseudoscorpion is not a kind of a Fulgoridae and it is non-therapeutics does not hold.
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the stove is non-therapeutics.; sent2 -> int2: if the bourguignon is a Perdix or it is a synchrotron or both then it does not talk Mauritanian.;
that the materialist is a miner and does not outweigh is not correct.
sent16 -> int3: the fact that the materialist is a miner that does not outweigh does not hold if it is not a kind of a Fulgoridae.;
$hypothesis$ = the bourguignon does not talk Mauritanian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the pseudoscorpion is a Opel and not a broadcloth is false the stove is not therapeutics. sent2: if something is a Perdix and/or it is a synchrotron then it does not talk Mauritanian. sent3: if the stove is a Perdix but it is not a synchrotron the pseudoscorpion is an omnibus. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is not a Fulgoridae and it is an omnibus does not hold the bourguignon is a kind of a Perdix. sent5: if the fact that something is a Fulgoridae hold then it does talk Mauritanian. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a Fulgoridae then the bourguignon is a Perdix. sent7: something is not a Fulgoridae and is an omnibus. sent8: something is not an urgency if it either is not a kind of an urgency or does not hydrolyze or both. sent9: there is something such that that it is a kind of a Fulgoridae that is an omnibus is not correct. sent10: there is something such that it is not an urgency. sent11: if something is not an urgency then it is a kind of bladdery thing that does crank aleph-null. sent12: the stove is not therapeutics if the pseudoscorpion is a broadcloth. sent13: that that the pseudoscorpion is a Opel but it is not a broadcloth is correct is not right. sent14: something is a Perdix that is not a synchrotron if it is bladdery. sent15: if that the stove is non-therapeutics hold the fact that the gladiator is both a Fulgoridae and an omnibus is incorrect. sent16: if something is not a kind of a Fulgoridae then the fact that it is a miner that does not outweigh is false. sent17: the stove talks Mauritanian and is not a synchrotron if it is bladdery. sent18: the fact that the stove is a kind of therapeutics thing that is not a kind of a broadcloth is incorrect. sent19: if the stove talks Mauritanian and is not a synchrotron then it is not a kind of a Perdix. sent20: something does not talk Mauritanian if that it is a synchrotron is not false. sent21: that the pseudoscorpion is a kind of non-therapeutics thing that is not an omnibus does not hold if the stove is not a Perdix. sent22: the fact that the bourguignon is a Fulgoridae is not incorrect if the fact that the pseudoscorpion is not a kind of a Fulgoridae and it is non-therapeutics does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent13 -> int1: the stove is non-therapeutics.; sent2 -> int2: if the bourguignon is a Perdix or it is a synchrotron or both then it does not talk Mauritanian.; __UNKNOWN__