the fact that the fact that the chancing prurigo and the incriminating pigeonhole occurs is not true is correct.
sent1: that the walking happens but the incriminating kummel does not occur is triggered by that the incriminating eurypterid does not occur. sent2: the autographicness but not the undatableness happens. sent3: that the hummer does not occur and/or that the independence does not occur is brought about by that the walking happens. sent4: that the walk occurs is prevented by either the hummer or that the independence happens or both. sent5: if the assailing Empire does not occur both the Crucifixion and the questioning happens. sent6: the incriminating eurypterid occurs and the assailing arrogator does not occur. sent7: the melioration happens. sent8: the nosh does not occur if the fact that the nosh occurs but the incriminating Oklahoma does not occur is incorrect. sent9: if the angulation does not occur that the header and the septicness occurs is false. sent10: if that the header and the septicness happens is not right then that the assailing Empire does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: the incriminating permafrost happens. sent12: that the funambulism does not occur is prevented by that the questioning happens. sent13: if the hummer does not occur then the leaflessness does not occur. sent14: the incriminating kummel does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the nosh does not occur is not false not the incriminating pigeonhole but the assailing arrogator occurs. sent16: the fact that the incriminating pigeonhole happens is true. sent17: the two-step happens. sent18: that not the hummer but the incriminating eurypterid occurs prevents that the chancing prurigo does not occur. sent19: if the independence happens the walk does not occur. sent20: the fact that the nosh but not the incriminating Oklahoma occurs is wrong if the funambulism happens. sent21: the assailing arrogator does not occur. sent22: if the walk does not occur that the incriminating kummel happens is not incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hummer happens.; assump1 -> int1: the hummer and/or the independence occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the walk does not occur.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the incriminating kummel happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the hummer does not occur hold.; sent6 -> int6: the incriminating eurypterid occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the hummer does not occur but the incriminating eurypterid occurs.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the chancing prurigo occurs.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
that the chancing prurigo and the incriminating pigeonhole happens is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the fact that the chancing prurigo and the incriminating pigeonhole occurs is not true is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: that the walking happens but the incriminating kummel does not occur is triggered by that the incriminating eurypterid does not occur. sent2: the autographicness but not the undatableness happens. sent3: that the hummer does not occur and/or that the independence does not occur is brought about by that the walking happens. sent4: that the walk occurs is prevented by either the hummer or that the independence happens or both. sent5: if the assailing Empire does not occur both the Crucifixion and the questioning happens. sent6: the incriminating eurypterid occurs and the assailing arrogator does not occur. sent7: the melioration happens. sent8: the nosh does not occur if the fact that the nosh occurs but the incriminating Oklahoma does not occur is incorrect. sent9: if the angulation does not occur that the header and the septicness occurs is false. sent10: if that the header and the septicness happens is not right then that the assailing Empire does not occur is not incorrect. sent11: the incriminating permafrost happens. sent12: that the funambulism does not occur is prevented by that the questioning happens. sent13: if the hummer does not occur then the leaflessness does not occur. sent14: the incriminating kummel does not occur. sent15: if the fact that the nosh does not occur is not false not the incriminating pigeonhole but the assailing arrogator occurs. sent16: the fact that the incriminating pigeonhole happens is true. sent17: the two-step happens. sent18: that not the hummer but the incriminating eurypterid occurs prevents that the chancing prurigo does not occur. sent19: if the independence happens the walk does not occur. sent20: the fact that the nosh but not the incriminating Oklahoma occurs is wrong if the funambulism happens. sent21: the assailing arrogator does not occur. sent22: if the walk does not occur that the incriminating kummel happens is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hummer happens.; assump1 -> int1: the hummer and/or the independence occurs.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the walk does not occur.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the incriminating kummel happens.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the hummer does not occur hold.; sent6 -> int6: the incriminating eurypterid occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the hummer does not occur but the incriminating eurypterid occurs.; int7 & sent18 -> int8: the chancing prurigo occurs.; int8 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__