the creditor does sterilize sliminess.
sent1: the fact that the partridge is not destructive is not false if the islander is modern thing that is not professional. sent2: if the fact that the partridge decoys mildness but it is not a hunched is not right the islander is a supergiant. sent3: something decoys mildness and it is unprofessional. sent4: the majors is not radiolucent if it is common. sent5: that the islander is cretaceous hold if it decoys liner. sent6: the islander is not nonmodern if it is cretaceous. sent7: a non-destructive thing is not a kind of a dollop and is not a kind of a supergiant. sent8: the partridge is a dollop if it does decoy mildness and is not a hunched. sent9: if that the majors is not radiolucent is not wrong the bit is not a kind of a Nyamwezi. sent10: that something is choragic and/or is a suggestibility is not true if it is not a Nyamwezi. sent11: if the majors is non-destructive and it is not unprofessional the creditor does not sterilize sliminess. sent12: if the bit is not destructive that the majors is both not destructive and not unprofessional hold. sent13: the bit is not destructive if the partridge is a dollop. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a modern and it is a suggestibility. sent15: the islander is not a supergiant if something that is modern is a suggestibility. sent16: the majors is not destructive and not a hunched. sent17: the creditor does not sterilize sliminess if the majors is both not non-destructive and professional. sent18: the fact that the islander does decoy liner is not incorrect. sent19: the majors is common.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the partridge decoys mildness but it is not a hunched is not right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the islander is a kind of a supergiant hold.; sent14 & sent15 -> int2: the islander is not a supergiant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the partridge does decoy mildness and is not a hunched.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the partridge is a dollop.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the bit is not destructive.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the majors is a kind of non-destructive thing that is not unprofessional.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
that the creditor sterilizes sliminess is not wrong.
sent7 -> int8: the partridge is not a dollop and it is not a supergiant if it is not destructive.; sent5 & sent18 -> int9: the islander is not non-cretaceous.; sent6 & int9 -> int10: the islander is modern.; sent10 -> int11: the fact that either the bit is choragic or it is a suggestibility or both is not correct if the fact that it is not a Nyamwezi is true.; sent4 & sent19 -> int12: the majors is not radiolucent.; sent9 & int12 -> int13: the bit is not a Nyamwezi.; int11 & int13 -> int14: that the bit is choragic or it is a suggestibility or both is wrong.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that the fact that it is choragic or it is a kind of a suggestibility or both is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the creditor does sterilize sliminess. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the partridge is not destructive is not false if the islander is modern thing that is not professional. sent2: if the fact that the partridge decoys mildness but it is not a hunched is not right the islander is a supergiant. sent3: something decoys mildness and it is unprofessional. sent4: the majors is not radiolucent if it is common. sent5: that the islander is cretaceous hold if it decoys liner. sent6: the islander is not nonmodern if it is cretaceous. sent7: a non-destructive thing is not a kind of a dollop and is not a kind of a supergiant. sent8: the partridge is a dollop if it does decoy mildness and is not a hunched. sent9: if that the majors is not radiolucent is not wrong the bit is not a kind of a Nyamwezi. sent10: that something is choragic and/or is a suggestibility is not true if it is not a Nyamwezi. sent11: if the majors is non-destructive and it is not unprofessional the creditor does not sterilize sliminess. sent12: if the bit is not destructive that the majors is both not destructive and not unprofessional hold. sent13: the bit is not destructive if the partridge is a dollop. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a modern and it is a suggestibility. sent15: the islander is not a supergiant if something that is modern is a suggestibility. sent16: the majors is not destructive and not a hunched. sent17: the creditor does not sterilize sliminess if the majors is both not non-destructive and professional. sent18: the fact that the islander does decoy liner is not incorrect. sent19: the majors is common. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the partridge decoys mildness but it is not a hunched is not right.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the islander is a kind of a supergiant hold.; sent14 & sent15 -> int2: the islander is not a supergiant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the partridge does decoy mildness and is not a hunched.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the partridge is a dollop.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the bit is not destructive.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the majors is a kind of non-destructive thing that is not unprofessional.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__