that the acylation does greet telegram and is a fine does not hold.
sent1: that the acylation does greet telegram and is a fine does not hold if the fact that the leaf-miner is not an eloquence is not wrong. sent2: the acylation charts. sent3: something is a kind of a qoph if that it is not a kind of a qoph and it is an eloquence does not hold. sent4: if the acylation does not refresh circumlocution it greets telegram and it is a seventies. sent5: the meson is ducal and is Freudian. sent6: the acylation dumps Peirce and is Monacan. sent7: the acylation is a qoph and greets telegram if it is not an eloquence. sent8: if something is a Freudian then that it is not a subscript and it dumps Peirce does not hold. sent9: if the paregoric is not a kind of a Tennessean then it is pyrochemical and it is a kind of a fine. sent10: the acylation is a fine. sent11: the Teflon is a kind of a stonefly. sent12: that the acylation is a kind of a stonefly hold. sent13: something that is an eloquence is not a kind of a stonefly. sent14: the radical is not a stonefly. sent15: the leaf-miner is not an eloquence if the fact that the poroporo is both not a qoph and an eloquence is not true.
sent13 -> int1: the acylation is not a stonefly if it is a kind of an eloquence.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the acylation is an eloquence is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the acylation is not a stonefly.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the acylation is not an eloquence.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the acylation is a kind of a qoph that does greet telegram.; int5 -> int6: the acylation greets telegram.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the flinthead is a qoph.
sent3 -> int7: if that the flinthead is not a qoph and is a kind of an eloquence does not hold then it is a kind of a qoph.;
$hypothesis$ = that the acylation does greet telegram and is a fine does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the acylation does greet telegram and is a fine does not hold if the fact that the leaf-miner is not an eloquence is not wrong. sent2: the acylation charts. sent3: something is a kind of a qoph if that it is not a kind of a qoph and it is an eloquence does not hold. sent4: if the acylation does not refresh circumlocution it greets telegram and it is a seventies. sent5: the meson is ducal and is Freudian. sent6: the acylation dumps Peirce and is Monacan. sent7: the acylation is a qoph and greets telegram if it is not an eloquence. sent8: if something is a Freudian then that it is not a subscript and it dumps Peirce does not hold. sent9: if the paregoric is not a kind of a Tennessean then it is pyrochemical and it is a kind of a fine. sent10: the acylation is a fine. sent11: the Teflon is a kind of a stonefly. sent12: that the acylation is a kind of a stonefly hold. sent13: something that is an eloquence is not a kind of a stonefly. sent14: the radical is not a stonefly. sent15: the leaf-miner is not an eloquence if the fact that the poroporo is both not a qoph and an eloquence is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the acylation is not a stonefly if it is a kind of an eloquence.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the acylation is an eloquence is correct.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the acylation is not a stonefly.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the acylation is not an eloquence.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the acylation is a kind of a qoph that does greet telegram.; int5 -> int6: the acylation greets telegram.; int6 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__