that there is something such that if it is nonarboreal then that it does not service scatophagy and it does not weekend is not correct is not right.
sent1: that the fact that the bilocation does not service scatophagy and it does not weekend is not false if the bilocation is nonarboreal is not false. sent2: there is something such that if it does incinerate then that the fact that it is not unhealthy and it does not service alligatored hold is not correct. sent3: if the bole is nonarboreal that it does not play and is not new is not correct. sent4: that the bilocation does not service scatophagy and is not a weekend is wrong if it is nonarboreal. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a 24/7 is right then that it is rhythmical and it is not a ingenuousness is wrong. sent6: if something is a placenta that it is not a daemon and it does not immigrate is wrong. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it fractures gunite the fact that it is not bifilar and is not basilican is not correct is not incorrect. sent8: if the bilocation services scatophagy then that it is not photosynthetic and it does not reface hearts is not correct. sent9: there is something such that if it is nonarboreal then it does not service scatophagy and it does not weekend. sent10: if the fact that the bilocation is nonarboreal is correct then that it does service scatophagy and is not a weekend is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it is nonarboreal the fact that it does service scatophagy and is not a kind of a weekend is wrong. sent12: the fact that if something is esoteric the fact that it does not service scatophagy and does not fox is false is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is nonarboreal then the fact that it does not service scatophagy and is a weekend does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if that it does fracture pining is not wrong then that it is non-chaetognathan thing that is not papilliform does not hold. sent15: the fact that the bilocation does not service scatophagy but it weekends is not right if it is nonarboreal.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bilocation does not service scatophagy and does not fox does not hold if it is esoteric.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is nonarboreal then that it does not service scatophagy and it does not weekend is not correct is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the fact that the bilocation does not service scatophagy and it does not weekend is not false if the bilocation is nonarboreal is not false. sent2: there is something such that if it does incinerate then that the fact that it is not unhealthy and it does not service alligatored hold is not correct. sent3: if the bole is nonarboreal that it does not play and is not new is not correct. sent4: that the bilocation does not service scatophagy and is not a weekend is wrong if it is nonarboreal. sent5: there exists something such that if that it is a 24/7 is right then that it is rhythmical and it is not a ingenuousness is wrong. sent6: if something is a placenta that it is not a daemon and it does not immigrate is wrong. sent7: the fact that there exists something such that if it fractures gunite the fact that it is not bifilar and is not basilican is not correct is not incorrect. sent8: if the bilocation services scatophagy then that it is not photosynthetic and it does not reface hearts is not correct. sent9: there is something such that if it is nonarboreal then it does not service scatophagy and it does not weekend. sent10: if the fact that the bilocation is nonarboreal is correct then that it does service scatophagy and is not a weekend is wrong. sent11: there is something such that if it is nonarboreal the fact that it does service scatophagy and is not a kind of a weekend is wrong. sent12: the fact that if something is esoteric the fact that it does not service scatophagy and does not fox is false is not false. sent13: there exists something such that if it is nonarboreal then the fact that it does not service scatophagy and is a weekend does not hold. sent14: there is something such that if that it does fracture pining is not wrong then that it is non-chaetognathan thing that is not papilliform does not hold. sent15: the fact that the bilocation does not service scatophagy but it weekends is not right if it is nonarboreal. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__