the florist is inedible thing that does carry.
sent1: that the addressee is not edible is correct if the fact that the florist is edible does not hold. sent2: if the addressee is a kind of a Tantrist then it is not a riff. sent3: if the florist is not a instillation the Acular is not a instillation. sent4: the cinquefoil is not sacrificial. sent5: the Acular is not a kind of a instillation. sent6: if something does not pass Prairial the fact that it is both not edible and a carry is false. sent7: if the cinquefoil is a instillation that it is non-sacrificial is not wrong. sent8: the addressee is not adactylous. sent9: the Acular is not tuneless if the addressee is not adactylous and it does not riff. sent10: if the fact that that something is not edible and is a kind of a carry is correct is not correct it is not a instillation. sent11: the fact that something is not a instillation but it does pass Prairial is not true if it meddles. sent12: the addressee is not a instillation if that it is a trowel is not false. sent13: the addressee does not meddle if that the fact that the Acular is a kind of a instillation and/or passes Prairial is false is not wrong. sent14: the Acular is not a kind of an ensemble if it is not tuneless. sent15: everything is an ensemble. sent16: if that something is not a trowel and does meddle does not hold then it is not sacrificial. sent17: the florist does carry. sent18: if the cinquefoil does not meddle then the fact that the addressee is a kind of a instillation but it does not pass Prairial does not hold. sent19: something is not a instillation if it is not a kind of a carry. sent20: the florist does trowel and is sacrificial if the Acular is not an ensemble. sent21: if the florist is not a instillation then that the Acular is a instillation and/or it does pass Prairial does not hold. sent22: if the florist is not a carry it is not a instillation. sent23: there is something such that that it is not a kind of an efferent is not right. sent24: if something is a trowel it does meddle.
sent10 -> int1: that the florist is not a instillation is correct if that it is not edible and it does carry is not right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the florist is not edible but it is a carry is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the florist is not a instillation.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: that the Acular is a instillation or it does pass Prairial or both is wrong.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the addressee does not meddle.;
the stamper is not an efferent but it trowels.
sent15 -> int5: the sperm is an ensemble.;
$hypothesis$ = the florist is inedible thing that does carry. ; $context$ = sent1: that the addressee is not edible is correct if the fact that the florist is edible does not hold. sent2: if the addressee is a kind of a Tantrist then it is not a riff. sent3: if the florist is not a instillation the Acular is not a instillation. sent4: the cinquefoil is not sacrificial. sent5: the Acular is not a kind of a instillation. sent6: if something does not pass Prairial the fact that it is both not edible and a carry is false. sent7: if the cinquefoil is a instillation that it is non-sacrificial is not wrong. sent8: the addressee is not adactylous. sent9: the Acular is not tuneless if the addressee is not adactylous and it does not riff. sent10: if the fact that that something is not edible and is a kind of a carry is correct is not correct it is not a instillation. sent11: the fact that something is not a instillation but it does pass Prairial is not true if it meddles. sent12: the addressee is not a instillation if that it is a trowel is not false. sent13: the addressee does not meddle if that the fact that the Acular is a kind of a instillation and/or passes Prairial is false is not wrong. sent14: the Acular is not a kind of an ensemble if it is not tuneless. sent15: everything is an ensemble. sent16: if that something is not a trowel and does meddle does not hold then it is not sacrificial. sent17: the florist does carry. sent18: if the cinquefoil does not meddle then the fact that the addressee is a kind of a instillation but it does not pass Prairial does not hold. sent19: something is not a instillation if it is not a kind of a carry. sent20: the florist does trowel and is sacrificial if the Acular is not an ensemble. sent21: if the florist is not a instillation then that the Acular is a instillation and/or it does pass Prairial does not hold. sent22: if the florist is not a carry it is not a instillation. sent23: there is something such that that it is not a kind of an efferent is not right. sent24: if something is a trowel it does meddle. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: that the florist is not a instillation is correct if that it is not edible and it does carry is not right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the florist is not edible but it is a carry is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the florist is not a instillation.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: that the Acular is a instillation or it does pass Prairial or both is wrong.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the addressee does not meddle.; __UNKNOWN__