the garnish is a kind of a Lisbon.
sent1: if the garnish is not a Kuki then that it is not an overhang is not false. sent2: the wanton is numerical. sent3: that everything is numerical is true. sent4: that the garnish either is not a kind of a laurelwood or does not liquidize or both is not correct. sent5: the liner is an overhang. sent6: that the Edwardian is a yarrow is not false. sent7: if something that is anticyclonic is not a kind of an overhang then it is a Lisbon. sent8: the fact that the wanton does not fret gadgeteer or it is not numerical or both does not hold. sent9: if something is anticyclonic and it is a kind of an overhang then it is a kind of a Lisbon. sent10: if the Edwardian is a kind of non-metabolic a yarrow the wanton does not fret gadgeteer. sent11: the wanton is not a thiopental or it is not a vagrancy or both. sent12: if the fact that the wanton does contradistinguish mezzo-relievo and/or is metabolic is not right then the Edwardian does not contradistinguish mezzo-relievo. sent13: the fact that the garnish is not an overhang hold. sent14: the garnish is a kind of a Lisbon if it is a kind of anticyclonic thing that is an overhang. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a Kuki the Edwardian is a yarrow. sent16: the fact that the wanton is not anticyclonic and/or it is not a dedifferentiation is incorrect. sent17: if the Edwardian is not a kind of a Lisbon and is a Kuki the garnish is not a kind of a Lisbon. sent18: the Edwardian is not metabolic and is a kind of a yarrow if the fact that there exists something such that it is a Kuki is correct. sent19: the wanton does not fret gadgeteer or it is numerical or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the garnish is a Kuki.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Kuki.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the Edwardian is a kind of non-metabolic a yarrow.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the wanton does not fret gadgeteer.; int3 -> int4: the wanton does not fret gadgeteer and/or it is not numerical.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the garnish is a Kuki is not true.; sent7 -> int7: the garnish is a Lisbon if that it is both anticyclonic and not an overhang is right.;
the Edwardian does not contradistinguish mezzo-relievo.
$hypothesis$ = the garnish is a kind of a Lisbon. ; $context$ = sent1: if the garnish is not a Kuki then that it is not an overhang is not false. sent2: the wanton is numerical. sent3: that everything is numerical is true. sent4: that the garnish either is not a kind of a laurelwood or does not liquidize or both is not correct. sent5: the liner is an overhang. sent6: that the Edwardian is a yarrow is not false. sent7: if something that is anticyclonic is not a kind of an overhang then it is a Lisbon. sent8: the fact that the wanton does not fret gadgeteer or it is not numerical or both does not hold. sent9: if something is anticyclonic and it is a kind of an overhang then it is a kind of a Lisbon. sent10: if the Edwardian is a kind of non-metabolic a yarrow the wanton does not fret gadgeteer. sent11: the wanton is not a thiopental or it is not a vagrancy or both. sent12: if the fact that the wanton does contradistinguish mezzo-relievo and/or is metabolic is not right then the Edwardian does not contradistinguish mezzo-relievo. sent13: the fact that the garnish is not an overhang hold. sent14: the garnish is a kind of a Lisbon if it is a kind of anticyclonic thing that is an overhang. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a Kuki the Edwardian is a yarrow. sent16: the fact that the wanton is not anticyclonic and/or it is not a dedifferentiation is incorrect. sent17: if the Edwardian is not a kind of a Lisbon and is a Kuki the garnish is not a kind of a Lisbon. sent18: the Edwardian is not metabolic and is a kind of a yarrow if the fact that there exists something such that it is a Kuki is correct. sent19: the wanton does not fret gadgeteer or it is numerical or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the garnish is a Kuki.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that it is a Kuki.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the Edwardian is a kind of non-metabolic a yarrow.; int2 & sent10 -> int3: the wanton does not fret gadgeteer.; int3 -> int4: the wanton does not fret gadgeteer and/or it is not numerical.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the garnish is a Kuki is not true.; sent7 -> int7: the garnish is a Lisbon if that it is both anticyclonic and not an overhang is right.; __UNKNOWN__