the fact that if the laugher is isopteran the fact that the isogone is both an offering and not a bouquet is not right is incorrect.
sent1: that the isogone is a kind of a short-stop that is a bouquet does not hold if the bacchante is not a short-stop. sent2: if the laugher is a Kinosternon it is a Bowie. sent3: the laugher is a Kinosternon. sent4: if something that is a Bowie is isopteran then the bacchante is a short-stop. sent5: if the Bush is not an offering the fact that the isogone does offering but it is not a kind of a bouquet is not correct. sent6: the fact that the burgrass is not matutinal and it is not a kind of a short-stop is wrong if the bacchante is a short-stop. sent7: if that the burgrass is not matutinal and it is not a short-stop is not correct the Bush is not an offering. sent8: if something is an offering it is a potshot.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the laugher is a kind of a Bowie.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laugher is isopteran.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the laugher is a Bowie and it is isopteran.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a Bowie and it is isopteran.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the bacchante is a short-stop.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the burgrass is not matutinal and not a short-stop is incorrect.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the Bush is not an offering.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: that the isogone is an offering that is not a bouquet is not right.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
the starches is a kind of a potshot if it offers.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the laugher is isopteran the fact that the isogone is both an offering and not a bouquet is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: that the isogone is a kind of a short-stop that is a bouquet does not hold if the bacchante is not a short-stop. sent2: if the laugher is a Kinosternon it is a Bowie. sent3: the laugher is a Kinosternon. sent4: if something that is a Bowie is isopteran then the bacchante is a short-stop. sent5: if the Bush is not an offering the fact that the isogone does offering but it is not a kind of a bouquet is not correct. sent6: the fact that the burgrass is not matutinal and it is not a kind of a short-stop is wrong if the bacchante is a short-stop. sent7: if that the burgrass is not matutinal and it is not a short-stop is not correct the Bush is not an offering. sent8: if something is an offering it is a potshot. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the laugher is a kind of a Bowie.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the laugher is isopteran.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the laugher is a Bowie and it is isopteran.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that it is a Bowie and it is isopteran.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the bacchante is a short-stop.; sent6 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the burgrass is not matutinal and not a short-stop is incorrect.; sent7 & int5 -> int6: the Bush is not an offering.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: that the isogone is an offering that is not a bouquet is not right.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__