the incubation does not occur.
sent1: that the influentialness does not occur leads to that the disruption does not occur. sent2: the barrels occurs. sent3: the macrocephalicness happens. sent4: the unfrozenness does not occur if the fact that the deformation does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the farting ironmonger happens. sent6: the cornhusking happens. sent7: if the rolling tepee happens then the habanera occurs. sent8: the scratch occurs. sent9: the swoosh does not occur and/or the deformation does not occur. sent10: the slash happens. sent11: if the fact that the tarriance happens hold the incubation happens. sent12: that the swoosh does not occur yields that the unfrozenness does not occur. sent13: if the freckling lockage occurs then the parameter occurs. sent14: that the rolling serval does not occur is triggered by that the parameter occurs and the thunderstorm happens. sent15: the infectiousness occurs if the rigging lace occurs. sent16: the blizzard does not occur and/or the aquatic does not occur. sent17: if the vivification does not occur then the farting pussycat does not occur. sent18: the thunderstorm occurs and the scratch happens. sent19: the agreement occurs. sent20: if the freckling lockage does not occur then the tarriance happens. sent21: the non-unfrozenness triggers that the rolling serval and the miotic occurs. sent22: that the devitalization does not occur is prevented by the rigging honeysucker.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freckling lockage happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the parameter occurs.; sent18 -> int2: the thunderstorm happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the parameter and the thunderstorm occurs.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the rolling serval does not occur.; sent9 & sent12 & sent4 -> int5: that the unfrozenness does not occur hold.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the rolling serval and the miotic occurs.; int6 -> int7: that the rolling serval happens is true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the freckling lockage does not occur.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the tarriance occurs.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the incubation does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the influentialness does not occur leads to that the disruption does not occur. sent2: the barrels occurs. sent3: the macrocephalicness happens. sent4: the unfrozenness does not occur if the fact that the deformation does not occur is not incorrect. sent5: the farting ironmonger happens. sent6: the cornhusking happens. sent7: if the rolling tepee happens then the habanera occurs. sent8: the scratch occurs. sent9: the swoosh does not occur and/or the deformation does not occur. sent10: the slash happens. sent11: if the fact that the tarriance happens hold the incubation happens. sent12: that the swoosh does not occur yields that the unfrozenness does not occur. sent13: if the freckling lockage occurs then the parameter occurs. sent14: that the rolling serval does not occur is triggered by that the parameter occurs and the thunderstorm happens. sent15: the infectiousness occurs if the rigging lace occurs. sent16: the blizzard does not occur and/or the aquatic does not occur. sent17: if the vivification does not occur then the farting pussycat does not occur. sent18: the thunderstorm occurs and the scratch happens. sent19: the agreement occurs. sent20: if the freckling lockage does not occur then the tarriance happens. sent21: the non-unfrozenness triggers that the rolling serval and the miotic occurs. sent22: that the devitalization does not occur is prevented by the rigging honeysucker. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the freckling lockage happens.; sent13 & assump1 -> int1: the parameter occurs.; sent18 -> int2: the thunderstorm happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the parameter and the thunderstorm occurs.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the rolling serval does not occur.; sent9 & sent12 & sent4 -> int5: that the unfrozenness does not occur hold.; sent21 & int5 -> int6: the rolling serval and the miotic occurs.; int6 -> int7: that the rolling serval happens is true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the freckling lockage does not occur.; int9 & sent20 -> int10: the tarriance occurs.; int10 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__