the eclair is a Bowie.
sent1: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a Symphytum or is not unjust or both is correct is false if it ogles Dowland. sent2: the eclair removes if the fact that the lift does disentangle is not false. sent3: if the lift ogles Dowland and it is katabatic the codger does not remove. sent4: if that that either the codger is a remove or it does not ogle Dowland or both is correct does not hold it is katabatic. sent5: the NOC is epileptic. sent6: if the tortoise is a kind of a trainband that defends then the NOC is not a mesalliance. sent7: that either the NOC does glaze Anoectochilus or it is not an epileptic or both does not hold if something is not a remove. sent8: if the fact that either something does glaze Anoectochilus or it is epileptic or both is wrong then it is precordial. sent9: the tortoise is a trainband and does grasp clogging. sent10: that the codger glazes Anoectochilus and is an epileptic is false if the NOC is not a mesalliance. sent11: the lift ogles Dowland. sent12: The Dowland ogles lift. sent13: something removes. sent14: that the dictionary is an epileptic is true. sent15: if that the NOC is not precordial is incorrect then the eclair is a Bowie. sent16: that if there is something such that the fact that it is not a remove hold then the NOC is a kind of an epileptic is true. sent17: the eclair does remove if the lift is precordial. sent18: if something does not glaze dictionary then it is not a kind of a self-control. sent19: the lift is katabatic. sent20: everything does not glaze dictionary. sent21: the tortoise is a kind of a Symphytum that does defend. sent22: if there is something such that that it glazes Anoectochilus and it is an epileptic is not right the eclair is not katabatic. sent23: something is precordial if that it either glazes Anoectochilus or is not epileptic or both is not right. sent24: something is not non-precordial and/or disentangles if it is not a self-control.
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the lift ogles Dowland and is katabatic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the codger is not a remove.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a remove is right.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that either the NOC does glaze Anoectochilus or it is not epileptic or both does not hold.; sent23 -> int5: the NOC is precordial if that it does glaze Anoectochilus or it is not an epileptic or both does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the NOC is precordial.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the lark is a Symphytum or is not unjust or both does not hold.
sent1 -> int7: the fact that either the lark is a Symphytum or it is not unjust or both does not hold if it ogles Dowland.;
$hypothesis$ = the eclair is a Bowie. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fact that something is a kind of a Symphytum or is not unjust or both is correct is false if it ogles Dowland. sent2: the eclair removes if the fact that the lift does disentangle is not false. sent3: if the lift ogles Dowland and it is katabatic the codger does not remove. sent4: if that that either the codger is a remove or it does not ogle Dowland or both is correct does not hold it is katabatic. sent5: the NOC is epileptic. sent6: if the tortoise is a kind of a trainband that defends then the NOC is not a mesalliance. sent7: that either the NOC does glaze Anoectochilus or it is not an epileptic or both does not hold if something is not a remove. sent8: if the fact that either something does glaze Anoectochilus or it is epileptic or both is wrong then it is precordial. sent9: the tortoise is a trainband and does grasp clogging. sent10: that the codger glazes Anoectochilus and is an epileptic is false if the NOC is not a mesalliance. sent11: the lift ogles Dowland. sent12: The Dowland ogles lift. sent13: something removes. sent14: that the dictionary is an epileptic is true. sent15: if that the NOC is not precordial is incorrect then the eclair is a Bowie. sent16: that if there is something such that the fact that it is not a remove hold then the NOC is a kind of an epileptic is true. sent17: the eclair does remove if the lift is precordial. sent18: if something does not glaze dictionary then it is not a kind of a self-control. sent19: the lift is katabatic. sent20: everything does not glaze dictionary. sent21: the tortoise is a kind of a Symphytum that does defend. sent22: if there is something such that that it glazes Anoectochilus and it is an epileptic is not right the eclair is not katabatic. sent23: something is precordial if that it either glazes Anoectochilus or is not epileptic or both is not right. sent24: something is not non-precordial and/or disentangles if it is not a self-control. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent19 -> int1: the lift ogles Dowland and is katabatic.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the codger is not a remove.; int2 -> int3: there is something such that the fact that it is not a remove is right.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: that either the NOC does glaze Anoectochilus or it is not epileptic or both does not hold.; sent23 -> int5: the NOC is precordial if that it does glaze Anoectochilus or it is not an epileptic or both does not hold.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the NOC is precordial.; int6 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__