the fact that the wallow happens but the excretoriness does not occur if the julienning incendiary happens is false.
sent1: the immunotherapy happens if the cerealness occurs but the extermination does not occur. sent2: the disguising capote happens if both the julienning fothergilla and the non-squaredness happens. sent3: the julienning henbane does not occur. sent4: the wallowing happens. sent5: the julienning pap does not occur. sent6: the glovelessness happens. sent7: the julienning fothergilla occurs. sent8: that the liberation happens is correct. sent9: that the disguising celerity does not occur hold. sent10: that the julienning incendiary does not occur is prevented by that both the excretoriness and the disguising capote happens. sent11: that both the julienning Teutonist and the thermostaticness happens prevents the julienning bellyband. sent12: if the shag occurs the cybercrime happens but the disguising celerity does not occur. sent13: the julienning prosthetist happens. sent14: the incuriousness occurs but the nonprofit does not occur. sent15: the itineration happens. sent16: that both the terrestrialness and the clapping affecting occurs prevents that the liberation does not occur. sent17: the julienning incendiary does not occur if the excretoriness happens and the disguising capote occurs. sent18: the julienning fothergilla happens and the squaredness does not occur. sent19: the julienning certification happens. sent20: the clapping miter occurs. sent21: the shagging occurs. sent22: the constantness does not occur.
sent2 & sent18 -> int1: the disguising capote occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the excretoriness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the excretoriness occurs and the disguising capote occurs.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the julienning incendiary does not occur is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the julienning incendiary occurs is true.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the excretoriness does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the wallow and the non-excretoriness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the wallow happens but the excretoriness does not occur if the julienning incendiary happens is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the immunotherapy happens if the cerealness occurs but the extermination does not occur. sent2: the disguising capote happens if both the julienning fothergilla and the non-squaredness happens. sent3: the julienning henbane does not occur. sent4: the wallowing happens. sent5: the julienning pap does not occur. sent6: the glovelessness happens. sent7: the julienning fothergilla occurs. sent8: that the liberation happens is correct. sent9: that the disguising celerity does not occur hold. sent10: that the julienning incendiary does not occur is prevented by that both the excretoriness and the disguising capote happens. sent11: that both the julienning Teutonist and the thermostaticness happens prevents the julienning bellyband. sent12: if the shag occurs the cybercrime happens but the disguising celerity does not occur. sent13: the julienning prosthetist happens. sent14: the incuriousness occurs but the nonprofit does not occur. sent15: the itineration happens. sent16: that both the terrestrialness and the clapping affecting occurs prevents that the liberation does not occur. sent17: the julienning incendiary does not occur if the excretoriness happens and the disguising capote occurs. sent18: the julienning fothergilla happens and the squaredness does not occur. sent19: the julienning certification happens. sent20: the clapping miter occurs. sent21: the shagging occurs. sent22: the constantness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent18 -> int1: the disguising capote occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the excretoriness occurs is not wrong.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: the excretoriness occurs and the disguising capote occurs.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the julienning incendiary does not occur is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the julienning incendiary occurs is true.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int4 -> int5: the excretoriness does not occur.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the wallow and the non-excretoriness happens.; [assump1] & int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__