the gastrolobium does exit.
sent1: the stanhope is not leptorrhine. sent2: the photoelectricity does ferret orifice if that it does cloud Pythia and/or it is not antithyroid is false. sent3: the gastrolobium is not a zap. sent4: if there are non-adenocarcinomatous things that the gastrolobium is antithyroid and/or does not ferret orifice is false. sent5: if the gastrolobium is not a masquerade then the stanhope is a kind of a masquerade and is not a weightlift. sent6: the pistillode is raptorial. sent7: if something is a weightlift then it is a conchfish. sent8: if the fact that either something is antithyroid or it does not ferret orifice or both is not right it is leptorrhine. sent9: if that that the photoelectricity is not raptorial but it clouds Pythia is not wrong is not true then the stanhope is a conchfish. sent10: the impact is not a masquerade if there is something such that that it is raptorial is true. sent11: the gastrolobium does exit if the stanhope is an exit. sent12: something is an exit if it is not non-antithyroid and not adenocarcinomatous. sent13: the fact that the photoelectricity is not raptorial but it clouds Pythia is not right. sent14: if something is both leptorrhine and an exit that it is not a kind of a masquerade is true. sent15: the pycnidium is both a gleba and raptorial. sent16: if something is a kind of a weightlift but it is not an apprehension it is not a kind of a supernumerary. sent17: something that does cloud Pythia and is a weightlift is not a kind of a conchfish. sent18: something is antithyroid and not adenocarcinomatous if it does not ferret orifice. sent19: something is not adenocarcinomatous. sent20: if the photoelectricity is an exit the stanhope is a kind of an exit. sent21: if the impact is not a masquerade but it is a conchfish then the photoelectricity is a masquerade. sent22: something that is a masquerade and is not a kind of a weightlift is not a kind of a conchfish. sent23: the impact is a weightlift if the becket either does not cloud Pythia or is not a kind of a demander or both.
sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that either the gastrolobium is antithyroid or it does not ferret orifice or both is not true.; sent8 -> int2: the gastrolobium is leptorrhine if the fact that it is antithyroid and/or it does not ferret orifice is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gastrolobium is leptorrhine.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gastrolobium is a kind of an exit.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the gastrolobium is leptorrhine and it does exit.; sent14 -> int5: if the gastrolobium is both leptorrhine and an exit it does not masquerade.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gastrolobium is not a masquerade.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the stanhope masquerades but it is not a weightlift.; sent22 -> int8: the stanhope is not a conchfish if it masquerades and is not a weightlift.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stanhope is not a conchfish.; sent9 & sent13 -> int10: the stanhope is a kind of a conchfish.; int9 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
if the Egyptian is a weightlift but it is not an apprehension it is not a supernumerary.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the gastrolobium does exit. ; $context$ = sent1: the stanhope is not leptorrhine. sent2: the photoelectricity does ferret orifice if that it does cloud Pythia and/or it is not antithyroid is false. sent3: the gastrolobium is not a zap. sent4: if there are non-adenocarcinomatous things that the gastrolobium is antithyroid and/or does not ferret orifice is false. sent5: if the gastrolobium is not a masquerade then the stanhope is a kind of a masquerade and is not a weightlift. sent6: the pistillode is raptorial. sent7: if something is a weightlift then it is a conchfish. sent8: if the fact that either something is antithyroid or it does not ferret orifice or both is not right it is leptorrhine. sent9: if that that the photoelectricity is not raptorial but it clouds Pythia is not wrong is not true then the stanhope is a conchfish. sent10: the impact is not a masquerade if there is something such that that it is raptorial is true. sent11: the gastrolobium does exit if the stanhope is an exit. sent12: something is an exit if it is not non-antithyroid and not adenocarcinomatous. sent13: the fact that the photoelectricity is not raptorial but it clouds Pythia is not right. sent14: if something is both leptorrhine and an exit that it is not a kind of a masquerade is true. sent15: the pycnidium is both a gleba and raptorial. sent16: if something is a kind of a weightlift but it is not an apprehension it is not a kind of a supernumerary. sent17: something that does cloud Pythia and is a weightlift is not a kind of a conchfish. sent18: something is antithyroid and not adenocarcinomatous if it does not ferret orifice. sent19: something is not adenocarcinomatous. sent20: if the photoelectricity is an exit the stanhope is a kind of an exit. sent21: if the impact is not a masquerade but it is a conchfish then the photoelectricity is a masquerade. sent22: something that is a masquerade and is not a kind of a weightlift is not a kind of a conchfish. sent23: the impact is a weightlift if the becket either does not cloud Pythia or is not a kind of a demander or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent19 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that either the gastrolobium is antithyroid or it does not ferret orifice or both is not true.; sent8 -> int2: the gastrolobium is leptorrhine if the fact that it is antithyroid and/or it does not ferret orifice is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the gastrolobium is leptorrhine.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gastrolobium is a kind of an exit.; int3 & assump1 -> int4: the gastrolobium is leptorrhine and it does exit.; sent14 -> int5: if the gastrolobium is both leptorrhine and an exit it does not masquerade.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the gastrolobium is not a masquerade.; int6 & sent5 -> int7: the stanhope masquerades but it is not a weightlift.; sent22 -> int8: the stanhope is not a conchfish if it masquerades and is not a weightlift.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the stanhope is not a conchfish.; sent9 & sent13 -> int10: the stanhope is a kind of a conchfish.; int9 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__