the fooling outport occurs.
sent1: that the climax does not occur hold. sent2: the fooling Faberge does not occur if the fact that the initiative happens and the emanation happens is not true. sent3: that the completion happens and the buzz occurs is true if the fooling Faberge does not occur. sent4: if that both the completion and the bag happens is not wrong the fooling outport does not occur. sent5: the freshet does not occur. sent6: the blaming Pacific occurs. sent7: the fact that the fooling spiffing does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the completion happens is not wrong. sent9: that the residence happens prevents that the fooling balker does not occur. sent10: the avulsion happens. sent11: the roping does not occur. sent12: the quadraphonicness does not occur. sent13: the cranking saprophyte does not occur and the packing does not occur. sent14: that the bagging does not occur and the trihydroxiness does not occur prevents the buzzing. sent15: if the trihydroxiness happens then the fact that the fooling outport occurs is not wrong. sent16: the non-evergreenness and the non-epentheticness happens. sent17: the completion but not the bag happens. sent18: the screening happens. sent19: the agonisticness does not occur. sent20: the residence but not the consisting occurs. sent21: both the internment and the non-liliaceousness happens. sent22: the Quechuanness and the non-plutocraticness happens. sent23: the buzzing happens.
sent17 -> int1: the bag does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trihydroxiness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bagging does not occur and the trihydroxiness does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the buzz does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the trihydroxiness occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the fooling outport does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fooling outport occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: that the climax does not occur hold. sent2: the fooling Faberge does not occur if the fact that the initiative happens and the emanation happens is not true. sent3: that the completion happens and the buzz occurs is true if the fooling Faberge does not occur. sent4: if that both the completion and the bag happens is not wrong the fooling outport does not occur. sent5: the freshet does not occur. sent6: the blaming Pacific occurs. sent7: the fact that the fooling spiffing does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the fact that the completion happens is not wrong. sent9: that the residence happens prevents that the fooling balker does not occur. sent10: the avulsion happens. sent11: the roping does not occur. sent12: the quadraphonicness does not occur. sent13: the cranking saprophyte does not occur and the packing does not occur. sent14: that the bagging does not occur and the trihydroxiness does not occur prevents the buzzing. sent15: if the trihydroxiness happens then the fact that the fooling outport occurs is not wrong. sent16: the non-evergreenness and the non-epentheticness happens. sent17: the completion but not the bag happens. sent18: the screening happens. sent19: the agonisticness does not occur. sent20: the residence but not the consisting occurs. sent21: both the internment and the non-liliaceousness happens. sent22: the Quechuanness and the non-plutocraticness happens. sent23: the buzzing happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent17 -> int1: the bag does not occur.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the trihydroxiness does not occur.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the bagging does not occur and the trihydroxiness does not occur.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: that the buzz does not occur is not wrong.; int3 & sent23 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the trihydroxiness occurs.; int5 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__