the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a lumpenproletariat then the fact that it does not card groove and it is a kind of a Vincetoxicum is not right is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the groove is not a kind of a Europol and does card groove is false if it is congestive. sent2: that the groove is not a Europol but it is not non-high-tech does not hold if it cards groove. sent3: there is something such that if it drags the fact that it is not a washcloth and it is a naturalness is not correct. sent4: the fact that the groove is not a Vincetoxicum but nonrepresentative is not true if it is a kind of a deductible. sent5: there exists something such that if it is an outrage then that it does not frighten Trent and it is a whoop is wrong. sent6: that something is not a catalyst and is a whoop is wrong if it cards Balder. sent7: if the groove is a lumpenproletariat the fact that it cards groove and is a Vincetoxicum is not correct. sent8: if the groove is a lumpenproletariat that it does not card groove and it is a Vincetoxicum is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a lumpenproletariat that the fact that it cards groove and it is a Vincetoxicum is not false does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a lumpenproletariat it does not card groove and it is a Vincetoxicum. sent11: if the groove is a lumpenproletariat then it does not card groove and is a Vincetoxicum. sent12: if something is a vocal the fact that it is not a lip and is exoteric is false.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the groove is not a kind of a lip but it is exoteric is incorrect if it is a kind of a vocal.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a kind of a lumpenproletariat then the fact that it does not card groove and it is a kind of a Vincetoxicum is not right is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the groove is not a kind of a Europol and does card groove is false if it is congestive. sent2: that the groove is not a Europol but it is not non-high-tech does not hold if it cards groove. sent3: there is something such that if it drags the fact that it is not a washcloth and it is a naturalness is not correct. sent4: the fact that the groove is not a Vincetoxicum but nonrepresentative is not true if it is a kind of a deductible. sent5: there exists something such that if it is an outrage then that it does not frighten Trent and it is a whoop is wrong. sent6: that something is not a catalyst and is a whoop is wrong if it cards Balder. sent7: if the groove is a lumpenproletariat the fact that it cards groove and is a Vincetoxicum is not correct. sent8: if the groove is a lumpenproletariat that it does not card groove and it is a Vincetoxicum is not correct. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a lumpenproletariat that the fact that it cards groove and it is a Vincetoxicum is not false does not hold. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a lumpenproletariat it does not card groove and it is a Vincetoxicum. sent11: if the groove is a lumpenproletariat then it does not card groove and is a Vincetoxicum. sent12: if something is a vocal the fact that it is not a lip and is exoteric is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__