the berkelium is a kind of retentive thing that is piezoelectric.
sent1: the berkelium is a urologist. sent2: the fact that the ford does transmute is not incorrect. sent3: that the ford is not a hired or it shoots or both does not hold if it does transmute. sent4: if something is Anglo-catholic then it is piezoelectric. sent5: something melanizes Putin and/or it is a commonness. sent6: something is a kind of a urologist if it is piezoelectric. sent7: that the berkelium repines cellulose is correct if the fact that something is not piezoelectric and/or does repines cellulose hold. sent8: if something is not retentive then the cellulose is a urologist and it is Anglo-catholic. sent9: the berkelium is a kind of Anglo-catholic a urologist. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a endoscopy the physique is not a commonness. sent11: there is something such that it melanizes cartage and/or it is not a endoscopy. sent12: there is something such that it is combinative and/or it is humane. sent13: something is retentive if it is a commonness. sent14: that the berkelium is a kind of a commonness is not false if there exists something such that it does not melanize Putin. sent15: the physique is not Anglo-catholic if it is not a commonness and it is not a urologist. sent16: the berkelium is a commonness if there is something such that it does not melanize Putin or it is a commonness or both. sent17: the berkelium does melanize Putin if there is something such that that either it does not hire or it is a shot or both is not true. sent18: the cellulose is piezoelectric and a major-domo if the fact that the physique is not a kind of a commonness hold. sent19: if that the incrustation does not repine webpage and is a kind of a urologist does not hold it repine webpage. sent20: the isobar is not a kind of a endoscopy if there is something such that it does melanize cartage or it is not a endoscopy or both.
sent9 -> int1: the berkelium is Anglo-catholic.; sent4 -> int2: the berkelium is piezoelectric if that it is Anglo-catholic hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the berkelium is piezoelectric is not wrong.; sent13 -> int4: if the berkelium is a commonness then it is not unretentive.;
the cellulose is Anglo-catholic and it is a major-domo.
sent3 & sent2 -> int5: the fact that the ford is not a hired or a shot or both is wrong.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that either it does not hire or it shoots or both is not correct.; int6 & sent17 -> int7: the berkelium melanizes Putin.; int7 -> int8: the berkelium melanizes Argos and/or it does melanize Putin.; sent11 & sent20 -> int9: the isobar is not a endoscopy.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is not a endoscopy is true.; int10 & sent10 -> int11: the physique is not a kind of a commonness.; sent18 & int11 -> int12: the cellulose is piezoelectric and it is a kind of a major-domo.; int12 -> int13: the cellulose is a major-domo.;
$hypothesis$ = the berkelium is a kind of retentive thing that is piezoelectric. ; $context$ = sent1: the berkelium is a urologist. sent2: the fact that the ford does transmute is not incorrect. sent3: that the ford is not a hired or it shoots or both does not hold if it does transmute. sent4: if something is Anglo-catholic then it is piezoelectric. sent5: something melanizes Putin and/or it is a commonness. sent6: something is a kind of a urologist if it is piezoelectric. sent7: that the berkelium repines cellulose is correct if the fact that something is not piezoelectric and/or does repines cellulose hold. sent8: if something is not retentive then the cellulose is a urologist and it is Anglo-catholic. sent9: the berkelium is a kind of Anglo-catholic a urologist. sent10: if there exists something such that it is not a endoscopy the physique is not a commonness. sent11: there is something such that it melanizes cartage and/or it is not a endoscopy. sent12: there is something such that it is combinative and/or it is humane. sent13: something is retentive if it is a commonness. sent14: that the berkelium is a kind of a commonness is not false if there exists something such that it does not melanize Putin. sent15: the physique is not Anglo-catholic if it is not a commonness and it is not a urologist. sent16: the berkelium is a commonness if there is something such that it does not melanize Putin or it is a commonness or both. sent17: the berkelium does melanize Putin if there is something such that that either it does not hire or it is a shot or both is not true. sent18: the cellulose is piezoelectric and a major-domo if the fact that the physique is not a kind of a commonness hold. sent19: if that the incrustation does not repine webpage and is a kind of a urologist does not hold it repine webpage. sent20: the isobar is not a kind of a endoscopy if there is something such that it does melanize cartage or it is not a endoscopy or both. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the berkelium is Anglo-catholic.; sent4 -> int2: the berkelium is piezoelectric if that it is Anglo-catholic hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the berkelium is piezoelectric is not wrong.; sent13 -> int4: if the berkelium is a commonness then it is not unretentive.; __UNKNOWN__