that there is something such that if it does not claw asynchronism and it does adhere it does not claw drilling hold.
sent1: if the pichiciago does not clap monocyte and does claw Fahd it is not Uniate. sent2: there is something such that if it does claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling. sent3: if the pichiciago does claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling. sent4: if something that does not claw asynchronism adheres it does not claw drilling. sent5: if something does claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling. sent6: there is something such that if it does not corrode impatience and is a zwieback it is not a kind of a NRC. sent7: if something is not a kind of a barrier but it is unsworn the fact that it corrodes Fornax is correct.
sent4 -> int1: if the pichiciago does not claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it does not claw asynchronism and it does adhere it does not claw drilling hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the pichiciago does not clap monocyte and does claw Fahd it is not Uniate. sent2: there is something such that if it does claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling. sent3: if the pichiciago does claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling. sent4: if something that does not claw asynchronism adheres it does not claw drilling. sent5: if something does claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling. sent6: there is something such that if it does not corrode impatience and is a zwieback it is not a kind of a NRC. sent7: if something is not a kind of a barrier but it is unsworn the fact that it corrodes Fornax is correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: if the pichiciago does not claw asynchronism and does adhere it does not claw drilling.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__