the Nepalese is not a pyromorphite.
sent1: that the Aeolian is not a psychobabble and does not destine Leptodactylus is not right if the burner does bespangle whitelash. sent2: something geysers reason. sent3: if something is a kind of a psychobabble then it is not a pyromorphite and it does not destine Leptodactylus. sent4: the fact that the foundation is not a Avon but it bespangles whitelash does not hold if the felo-de-se pitches. sent5: if something that is not a pyromorphite does not destine Leptodactylus then it geysers reason. sent6: the fact that the fact that either the fishpond does not geyser reason or it is not reputable or both is not incorrect does not hold. sent7: the ergotamine does not bespangle APC and does ball if the herbal is bisontine. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not geyser reason and/or is not reputable is not true then the Nepalese is a pyromorphite. sent9: if the gentianella is a cuticula the herbal is bisontine. sent10: if something does geyser Oreortyx then the fact that it is not ineligible and it is quartan is not correct. sent11: if the champion is not a Avon then it does bespangle whitelash and is a kind of a psychobabble. sent12: if the fact that the Aeolian is not a psychobabble and does not destine Leptodactylus is incorrect the Nepalese is not a kind of a pyromorphite. sent13: something is a kind of a cuticula if that it is a kind of a Lepidodendraceae is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the superstructure is disjunct is true. sent15: the felo-de-se is a pitch if the fact that that the ureter is non-ineligible a quartan is wrong is not incorrect. sent16: if the fact that the foundation is not a kind of a Avon but it does bespangle whitelash is not correct then the burner does bespangle whitelash. sent17: if there is something such that it is disjunct the gentianella is a kind of a Lepidodendraceae and it is a Shah.
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not geyser reason and/or it is not reputable is incorrect.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the champion does geyser reason.
sent5 -> int2: the champion geysers reason if it is not a pyromorphite and does not destine Leptodactylus.; sent3 -> int3: if that the champion is a psychobabble is not incorrect then it is not a pyromorphite and it does not destine Leptodactylus.;
$hypothesis$ = the Nepalese is not a pyromorphite. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Aeolian is not a psychobabble and does not destine Leptodactylus is not right if the burner does bespangle whitelash. sent2: something geysers reason. sent3: if something is a kind of a psychobabble then it is not a pyromorphite and it does not destine Leptodactylus. sent4: the fact that the foundation is not a Avon but it bespangles whitelash does not hold if the felo-de-se pitches. sent5: if something that is not a pyromorphite does not destine Leptodactylus then it geysers reason. sent6: the fact that the fact that either the fishpond does not geyser reason or it is not reputable or both is not incorrect does not hold. sent7: the ergotamine does not bespangle APC and does ball if the herbal is bisontine. sent8: if there exists something such that that it does not geyser reason and/or is not reputable is not true then the Nepalese is a pyromorphite. sent9: if the gentianella is a cuticula the herbal is bisontine. sent10: if something does geyser Oreortyx then the fact that it is not ineligible and it is quartan is not correct. sent11: if the champion is not a Avon then it does bespangle whitelash and is a kind of a psychobabble. sent12: if the fact that the Aeolian is not a psychobabble and does not destine Leptodactylus is incorrect the Nepalese is not a kind of a pyromorphite. sent13: something is a kind of a cuticula if that it is a kind of a Lepidodendraceae is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the superstructure is disjunct is true. sent15: the felo-de-se is a pitch if the fact that that the ureter is non-ineligible a quartan is wrong is not incorrect. sent16: if the fact that the foundation is not a kind of a Avon but it does bespangle whitelash is not correct then the burner does bespangle whitelash. sent17: if there is something such that it is disjunct the gentianella is a kind of a Lepidodendraceae and it is a Shah. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: there exists something such that the fact that it does not geyser reason and/or it is not reputable is incorrect.; int1 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__