the fact that there exists something such that either it is a codon or it is a kind of a smashing or both is incorrect.
sent1: the puddingwife is not ctenoid. sent2: if something is not a hide-and-seek and is not a legitimation then it sparks. sent3: the fact that the wulfenite does not drown if the wulfenite tramps stander is not incorrect. sent4: if something tramps stander it does not diminish Walpole and it does not drown. sent5: something is not a sarcosine and it does not diminish germanium if it does tramp stander. sent6: if something does direct credit then it is non-allogeneic. sent7: everything tramps stander. sent8: if that the attrition is a half-moon and/or it does not diminish inkblot is not correct then the has-been does not diminish inkblot. sent9: the dynamo does tramp stander if the vomiter does tramp stander. sent10: if something that does not diminish Walpole drowns then it smashes. sent11: something is a smashing but it is not a codon if it does not diminish inkblot. sent12: if something that does not diminish Walpole does not drown then it is a smashing.
sent4 -> int1: the wulfenite does not diminish Walpole and it does not drown if it does tramp stander.; sent7 -> int2: the wulfenite tramps stander.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wulfenite does not diminish Walpole and it does not drown.; sent12 -> int4: if the wulfenite does not diminish Walpole and does not drown it is a smashing.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the wulfenite smashes.; int5 -> int6: either the wulfenite is a codon or it is a kind of a smashing or both.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the dynamo is not a sarcosine and it does not diminish germanium.
sent5 -> int7: the dynamo is not a sarcosine and it does not diminish germanium if it tramps stander.; sent11 -> int8: that if the has-been does not diminish inkblot then the has-been is a smashing that is not a kind of a codon is right.; sent1 -> int9: there exists something such that it is not ctenoid.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that either it is a codon or it is a kind of a smashing or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the puddingwife is not ctenoid. sent2: if something is not a hide-and-seek and is not a legitimation then it sparks. sent3: the fact that the wulfenite does not drown if the wulfenite tramps stander is not incorrect. sent4: if something tramps stander it does not diminish Walpole and it does not drown. sent5: something is not a sarcosine and it does not diminish germanium if it does tramp stander. sent6: if something does direct credit then it is non-allogeneic. sent7: everything tramps stander. sent8: if that the attrition is a half-moon and/or it does not diminish inkblot is not correct then the has-been does not diminish inkblot. sent9: the dynamo does tramp stander if the vomiter does tramp stander. sent10: if something that does not diminish Walpole drowns then it smashes. sent11: something is a smashing but it is not a codon if it does not diminish inkblot. sent12: if something that does not diminish Walpole does not drown then it is a smashing. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the wulfenite does not diminish Walpole and it does not drown if it does tramp stander.; sent7 -> int2: the wulfenite tramps stander.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wulfenite does not diminish Walpole and it does not drown.; sent12 -> int4: if the wulfenite does not diminish Walpole and does not drown it is a smashing.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the wulfenite smashes.; int5 -> int6: either the wulfenite is a codon or it is a kind of a smashing or both.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__