the fact that the achromatinicness does not occur is correct.
sent1: the fact that the flicking linen happens and the specification occurs does not hold. sent2: the deprecation and the flicking linen occurs if the sociolinguisticness does not occur. sent3: the distributionalness occurs. sent4: the takedown happens and the reversedness occurs. sent5: the fact that the embarrassment but not the fluorescing occurs is not true. sent6: if the fact that the embarrassment does not occur and the fluorescing does not occur is not correct the fact that the u-turn occurs is correct. sent7: that the allogamy occurs and the aneurysmalness occurs is brought about by the non-substantivalness. sent8: if that the varnishing ozokerite and the racism occurs does not hold then the varnishing ozokerite does not occur. sent9: that the misdemeanor and the specification occurs prevents that the sociolinguisticness occurs. sent10: the tensing does not occur. sent11: the fact that the u-turn does not occur and the congenericness does not occur does not hold if the deprecation happens. sent12: the stretching occurs. sent13: the Spark happens. sent14: the patristicsness happens and the diplomaticness occurs if the varnishing fake does not occur. sent15: the flicking linen does not occur if the fact that the flicking linen happens and the specification occurs is not right. sent16: that that the circulating occurs and the nonfeasance occurs results in that the vicinalness does not occur is right. sent17: the unregenerateness does not occur if the fact that the unregenerateness happens and the achromatinicness occurs is wrong. sent18: if the flicking linen does not occur both the congenericness and the deprecation happens. sent19: the racism happens if that the varnishing sexpot occurs is not false. sent20: the fact that the synopticness does not occur and the refuting ingress does not occur does not hold. sent21: that the embarrassment does not occur and the fluorescing does not occur is not true. sent22: both the beep and the racism happens. sent23: if the fact that the perceptibleness happens and the presence occurs is false the perceptibleness does not occur.
sent6 & sent21 -> int1: that the u-turn occurs is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the achromatinicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the achromatinicness and the u-turn happens.; sent15 & sent1 -> int3: the flicking linen does not occur.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the congenericness happens and the deprecation happens.; int4 -> int5: the congenericness occurs.;
the unregenerateness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the achromatinicness does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the flicking linen happens and the specification occurs does not hold. sent2: the deprecation and the flicking linen occurs if the sociolinguisticness does not occur. sent3: the distributionalness occurs. sent4: the takedown happens and the reversedness occurs. sent5: the fact that the embarrassment but not the fluorescing occurs is not true. sent6: if the fact that the embarrassment does not occur and the fluorescing does not occur is not correct the fact that the u-turn occurs is correct. sent7: that the allogamy occurs and the aneurysmalness occurs is brought about by the non-substantivalness. sent8: if that the varnishing ozokerite and the racism occurs does not hold then the varnishing ozokerite does not occur. sent9: that the misdemeanor and the specification occurs prevents that the sociolinguisticness occurs. sent10: the tensing does not occur. sent11: the fact that the u-turn does not occur and the congenericness does not occur does not hold if the deprecation happens. sent12: the stretching occurs. sent13: the Spark happens. sent14: the patristicsness happens and the diplomaticness occurs if the varnishing fake does not occur. sent15: the flicking linen does not occur if the fact that the flicking linen happens and the specification occurs is not right. sent16: that that the circulating occurs and the nonfeasance occurs results in that the vicinalness does not occur is right. sent17: the unregenerateness does not occur if the fact that the unregenerateness happens and the achromatinicness occurs is wrong. sent18: if the flicking linen does not occur both the congenericness and the deprecation happens. sent19: the racism happens if that the varnishing sexpot occurs is not false. sent20: the fact that the synopticness does not occur and the refuting ingress does not occur does not hold. sent21: that the embarrassment does not occur and the fluorescing does not occur is not true. sent22: both the beep and the racism happens. sent23: if the fact that the perceptibleness happens and the presence occurs is false the perceptibleness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent21 -> int1: that the u-turn occurs is right.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the achromatinicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: both the achromatinicness and the u-turn happens.; sent15 & sent1 -> int3: the flicking linen does not occur.; sent18 & int3 -> int4: the congenericness happens and the deprecation happens.; int4 -> int5: the congenericness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__