the pentylenetetrazol does fight joylessness and does galumph.
sent1: if something is non-irremovable but it is a kind of a fondant the enforcer is not vagile. sent2: the enforcer is not vagile if there exists something such that it is irremovable and a fondant. sent3: something is chaste and not a sialolith. sent4: there is something such that it is not irremovable. sent5: there is something such that that it is a kind of chaste thing that is not a sialolith is false. sent6: if something is a kind of a Palestinian that it is a sialolith but not vagile does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the bobby is a miotic is not wrong then the pentylenetetrazol fights joylessness. sent8: the enforcer is a kind of a miotic. sent9: the pentylenetetrazol is not chaste if there is something such that the fact that it is chaste and it is not a sialolith is not right. sent10: something that is not chaste galumphs. sent11: the fact that something does fight joylessness and does galumph does not hold if it is not vagile. sent12: something is a guama if it is mores. sent13: the fact that if that the enforcer is a guama hold the tract is a Syngonium is not incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is chaste and it is a kind of a sialolith is not correct. sent15: a mores and Palestinian thing is not vagile. sent16: if something is not chaste the pentylenetetrazol is not chaste. sent17: something is not a sialolith if that it is a sialolith and it is not vagile is not right. sent18: the pentylenetetrazol is mores if the enforcer is not chaste but it is a miotic. sent19: something is high-resolution if the fact that it is not a kind of a wilding hold. sent20: if something is a kind of a Palestinian it is mores. sent21: if the tract is a kind of a Syngonium then the bobby is a miotic. sent22: something is not irremovable but a fondant. sent23: if the fact that that something is not a kind of a guama and is not a kind of a Syngonium is not false does not hold it is a Palestinian. sent24: something does not fight joylessness and is chaste.
sent22 & sent1 -> int1: that the enforcer is not vagile is correct.; sent20 -> int2: if the enforcer is a Palestinian it is mores.; sent12 -> int3: if the enforcer is mores then it is a guama.; sent10 -> int4: the pentylenetetrazol galumphs if it is not chaste.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the pentylenetetrazol is not chaste.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pentylenetetrazol galumphs.;
the copywriter is not a kind of a sialolith.
sent17 -> int7: the copywriter is not a kind of a sialolith if the fact that it is a sialolith that is not vagile is not right.; sent6 -> int8: that the copywriter is a sialolith but it is not vagile is not correct if it is a Palestinian.;
$hypothesis$ = the pentylenetetrazol does fight joylessness and does galumph. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is non-irremovable but it is a kind of a fondant the enforcer is not vagile. sent2: the enforcer is not vagile if there exists something such that it is irremovable and a fondant. sent3: something is chaste and not a sialolith. sent4: there is something such that it is not irremovable. sent5: there is something such that that it is a kind of chaste thing that is not a sialolith is false. sent6: if something is a kind of a Palestinian that it is a sialolith but not vagile does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the bobby is a miotic is not wrong then the pentylenetetrazol fights joylessness. sent8: the enforcer is a kind of a miotic. sent9: the pentylenetetrazol is not chaste if there is something such that the fact that it is chaste and it is not a sialolith is not right. sent10: something that is not chaste galumphs. sent11: the fact that something does fight joylessness and does galumph does not hold if it is not vagile. sent12: something is a guama if it is mores. sent13: the fact that if that the enforcer is a guama hold the tract is a Syngonium is not incorrect. sent14: there exists something such that the fact that it is chaste and it is a kind of a sialolith is not correct. sent15: a mores and Palestinian thing is not vagile. sent16: if something is not chaste the pentylenetetrazol is not chaste. sent17: something is not a sialolith if that it is a sialolith and it is not vagile is not right. sent18: the pentylenetetrazol is mores if the enforcer is not chaste but it is a miotic. sent19: something is high-resolution if the fact that it is not a kind of a wilding hold. sent20: if something is a kind of a Palestinian it is mores. sent21: if the tract is a kind of a Syngonium then the bobby is a miotic. sent22: something is not irremovable but a fondant. sent23: if the fact that that something is not a kind of a guama and is not a kind of a Syngonium is not false does not hold it is a Palestinian. sent24: something does not fight joylessness and is chaste. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent1 -> int1: that the enforcer is not vagile is correct.; sent20 -> int2: if the enforcer is a Palestinian it is mores.; sent12 -> int3: if the enforcer is mores then it is a guama.; sent10 -> int4: the pentylenetetrazol galumphs if it is not chaste.; sent5 & sent9 -> int5: the pentylenetetrazol is not chaste.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the pentylenetetrazol galumphs.; __UNKNOWN__