the limiter is ventricular.
sent1: the grease does quarantine platitude. sent2: the saw is not a kind of a normality if the counterweight is a pasang. sent3: the fact that the limiter quarantines Ajuga and does not halt is not true if it is not ventricular. sent4: the limiter does quarantine Prague. sent5: if the counterweight is a kind of a pasang then that the saw does not quarantine platitude or is a normality or both is not correct. sent6: that something is not a annunciator but it is ventricular is not true if it does not quarantine Prague. sent7: if the limiter is not ventricular then the fact that it does not quarantine Ajuga and halts is false. sent8: the counterweight is a pasang if the hydroxide quarantines Prague. sent9: if the fact that the limiter does not quarantine Ajuga and does not halt is not right it is a kind of a annunciator. sent10: if that something does not quarantine Prague is not incorrect it is not ventricular and not a annunciator. sent11: the counterweight is not ventricular. sent12: the hydroxide is long-chain. sent13: the saw does broil nonevent. sent14: the fact that the limiter does not quarantine Ajuga and does halt is false. sent15: the saw is not a normality. sent16: the saw is ventricular if the limiter broils nonevent. sent17: if that something does not quarantine platitude and/or it is a normality is not correct then it does not broil nonevent. sent18: if the limiter is not ventricular the fact that it does not quarantine Ajuga and does not halt does not hold. sent19: if the hydroxide does halt then that the counterweight either does not quarantine Prague or is a pasang or both does not hold. sent20: The nonevent does broil saw. sent21: the fact that the limiter does quarantine Ajuga and does not halt is false. sent22: the fact that the saw is ventricular is right if the limiter quarantines Ajuga.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limiter is not ventricular.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the limiter does not quarantine Ajuga and does not halt does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the limiter is a annunciator.; sent17 -> int3: the saw does not broil nonevent if that it does not quarantine platitude and/or it is a normality does not hold.;
the limiter is not ventricular.
sent6 -> int4: the fact that the hydroxide is not a annunciator but it is ventricular is not true if it does not quarantine Prague.;
$hypothesis$ = the limiter is ventricular. ; $context$ = sent1: the grease does quarantine platitude. sent2: the saw is not a kind of a normality if the counterweight is a pasang. sent3: the fact that the limiter quarantines Ajuga and does not halt is not true if it is not ventricular. sent4: the limiter does quarantine Prague. sent5: if the counterweight is a kind of a pasang then that the saw does not quarantine platitude or is a normality or both is not correct. sent6: that something is not a annunciator but it is ventricular is not true if it does not quarantine Prague. sent7: if the limiter is not ventricular then the fact that it does not quarantine Ajuga and halts is false. sent8: the counterweight is a pasang if the hydroxide quarantines Prague. sent9: if the fact that the limiter does not quarantine Ajuga and does not halt is not right it is a kind of a annunciator. sent10: if that something does not quarantine Prague is not incorrect it is not ventricular and not a annunciator. sent11: the counterweight is not ventricular. sent12: the hydroxide is long-chain. sent13: the saw does broil nonevent. sent14: the fact that the limiter does not quarantine Ajuga and does halt is false. sent15: the saw is not a normality. sent16: the saw is ventricular if the limiter broils nonevent. sent17: if that something does not quarantine platitude and/or it is a normality is not correct then it does not broil nonevent. sent18: if the limiter is not ventricular the fact that it does not quarantine Ajuga and does not halt does not hold. sent19: if the hydroxide does halt then that the counterweight either does not quarantine Prague or is a pasang or both does not hold. sent20: The nonevent does broil saw. sent21: the fact that the limiter does quarantine Ajuga and does not halt is false. sent22: the fact that the saw is ventricular is right if the limiter quarantines Ajuga. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the limiter is not ventricular.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the limiter does not quarantine Ajuga and does not halt does not hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the limiter is a annunciator.; sent17 -> int3: the saw does not broil nonevent if that it does not quarantine platitude and/or it is a normality does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__