the pacemaker does boggle and/or it is a havelock.
sent1: the fact that the pacemaker is chylific or it does boggle or both does not hold. sent2: that if that something is a reimbursement or it is chylific or both is not true it does not boggle is not false. sent3: if the pacemaker is not a reimbursement then either the mantle is a reimbursement or it is a breeder or both. sent4: either the mantle does temper Bahrain or it is a Ashkhabad or both. sent5: the dentine is not a reimbursement. sent6: there is something such that that it is a Poe is correct. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a breeder the fact that the mantle is a reimbursement and/or it is chylific is not right. sent8: the fact that the mantle is not chylific is correct. sent9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a breeder. sent10: the electric is a kind of a reimbursement that is atheistic if something is a Poe. sent11: there is something such that it is not a breeder. sent12: something is not a Peter if the fact that it either is a breeder or is a morosoph or both is false. sent13: the mantle is not chylific if there is something such that it is not a breeder. sent14: the pacemaker is chylific or a reimbursement or both if the mantle is not chylific. sent15: the fact that something either does boggle or is a kind of a havelock or both does not hold if it is not a breeder.
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the mantle is a reimbursement and/or it is chylific is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: if that the mantle is a reimbursement and/or is chylific is not true it does not boggle.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mantle does not boggle hold.;
the pacemaker is not a kind of a Peter if the fact that it is a breeder or is a morosoph or both is incorrect.
sent12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pacemaker does boggle and/or it is a havelock. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the pacemaker is chylific or it does boggle or both does not hold. sent2: that if that something is a reimbursement or it is chylific or both is not true it does not boggle is not false. sent3: if the pacemaker is not a reimbursement then either the mantle is a reimbursement or it is a breeder or both. sent4: either the mantle does temper Bahrain or it is a Ashkhabad or both. sent5: the dentine is not a reimbursement. sent6: there is something such that that it is a Poe is correct. sent7: if there is something such that it is not a breeder the fact that the mantle is a reimbursement and/or it is chylific is not right. sent8: the fact that the mantle is not chylific is correct. sent9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a breeder. sent10: the electric is a kind of a reimbursement that is atheistic if something is a Poe. sent11: there is something such that it is not a breeder. sent12: something is not a Peter if the fact that it either is a breeder or is a morosoph or both is false. sent13: the mantle is not chylific if there is something such that it is not a breeder. sent14: the pacemaker is chylific or a reimbursement or both if the mantle is not chylific. sent15: the fact that something either does boggle or is a kind of a havelock or both does not hold if it is not a breeder. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent7 -> int1: the fact that the mantle is a reimbursement and/or it is chylific is not correct.; sent2 -> int2: if that the mantle is a reimbursement and/or is chylific is not true it does not boggle.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the mantle does not boggle hold.; __UNKNOWN__