the rose is not achlorhydric.
sent1: if that that the palliative is not phonics and it is not amphoric is not incorrect does not hold then that it is amphoric hold. sent2: the rose is not achlorhydric if the eyewitness is achlorhydric and it is a kind of a patch. sent3: that the palliative is a kind of a Trapezium that is a defoliation does not hold if the fact that the iceboat is not phonics is correct. sent4: that the palliative is a defoliation or it does not intervene or both is wrong if it is amphoric. sent5: something is not phonics if that the fact that it is a kind of phonics a Taraxacum is right is not correct. sent6: the rose is not unlikely. sent7: if the fact that the heiress intervenes and it is amphoric is not correct then the eyewitness does not intervenes. sent8: the angelica does not intervene if it is amphoric and it is not a defoliation. sent9: the rose is not achlorhydric if that the eyewitness is not indoor but it is a patch is true. sent10: that the iceboat is a kind of phonics a Taraxacum is not correct. sent11: everything is amphoric and is not a kind of a defoliation. sent12: the nude patches. sent13: if that something is a kind of outdoor thing that patches is incorrect then it is achlorhydric. sent14: that the rose is indoor and it patches is false. sent15: if the angelica is not a patch that the rose is both not indoor and a patch is false. sent16: a patch intervenes. sent17: the rose is a bosom. sent18: if something is indoor it is achlorhydric.
sent16 -> int1: that the angelica does intervene if the angelica is a patch hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the angelica does patch.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the angelica does intervene.; sent11 -> int3: the angelica is amphoric but it is not a defoliation.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the angelica does not intervene.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the angelica is not a kind of a patch.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: that the rose is not indoor but it patches is incorrect.; sent13 -> int8: if that the rose is not indoor but it is a patch does not hold then it is achlorhydric.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis;
the rose is not achlorhydric.
sent5 -> int9: if the fact that the iceboat is a kind of phonics a Taraxacum is not correct it is not phonics.; int9 & sent10 -> int10: the iceboat is not phonics.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the palliative is a kind of a Trapezium and it is a defoliation is wrong.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that the fact that it is a Trapezium and a defoliation is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the rose is not achlorhydric. ; $context$ = sent1: if that that the palliative is not phonics and it is not amphoric is not incorrect does not hold then that it is amphoric hold. sent2: the rose is not achlorhydric if the eyewitness is achlorhydric and it is a kind of a patch. sent3: that the palliative is a kind of a Trapezium that is a defoliation does not hold if the fact that the iceboat is not phonics is correct. sent4: that the palliative is a defoliation or it does not intervene or both is wrong if it is amphoric. sent5: something is not phonics if that the fact that it is a kind of phonics a Taraxacum is right is not correct. sent6: the rose is not unlikely. sent7: if the fact that the heiress intervenes and it is amphoric is not correct then the eyewitness does not intervenes. sent8: the angelica does not intervene if it is amphoric and it is not a defoliation. sent9: the rose is not achlorhydric if that the eyewitness is not indoor but it is a patch is true. sent10: that the iceboat is a kind of phonics a Taraxacum is not correct. sent11: everything is amphoric and is not a kind of a defoliation. sent12: the nude patches. sent13: if that something is a kind of outdoor thing that patches is incorrect then it is achlorhydric. sent14: that the rose is indoor and it patches is false. sent15: if the angelica is not a patch that the rose is both not indoor and a patch is false. sent16: a patch intervenes. sent17: the rose is a bosom. sent18: if something is indoor it is achlorhydric. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> int1: that the angelica does intervene if the angelica is a patch hold.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the angelica does patch.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the angelica does intervene.; sent11 -> int3: the angelica is amphoric but it is not a defoliation.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the angelica does not intervene.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the angelica is not a kind of a patch.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: that the rose is not indoor but it patches is incorrect.; sent13 -> int8: if that the rose is not indoor but it is a patch does not hold then it is achlorhydric.; int7 & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__