the fact that the hunting does not occur and the feeling does not occur does not hold.
sent1: the easiness does not occur. sent2: that the icing does not occur and the prawning does not occur is triggered by the Avestan. sent3: if the folding babka happens the beeping intention does not occur and the Edwardianness does not occur. sent4: the hunting does not occur if that the ossicularness happens is not wrong. sent5: if the Down occurs the assaying does not occur and the platinizing leeward does not occur. sent6: that the folding stern occurs results in that the easiness does not occur. sent7: if that the hunt but not the ossicularness occurs is incorrect then the diagonalizableness does not occur. sent8: the folding pansy does not occur and the Faustianness does not occur. sent9: that the hunt does not occur is triggered by the ossicularness and/or that the proximateness occurs. sent10: the descanting does not occur and the platinizing Dexedrine does not occur. sent11: the feeling triggers that both the non-bibliopolicness and the proximateness occurs. sent12: the folding stern happens. sent13: the fact that the easiness happens but the platinizing fistmele does not occur is not true. sent14: either the beeping roadhog or the platinizing baron or both prevents the shuttingness. sent15: that the puritanicalness occurs is not false. sent16: the feeling does not occur. sent17: if the proximateness does not occur the fact that the easiness but not the platinizing fistmele happens does not hold. sent18: if the proximateness does not occur then the fact that the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur is not true. sent19: that the folding stern happens results in that the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proximateness does not occur.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: that that the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur is not correct is not wrong.; sent19 & sent12 -> int2: the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the proximateness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the ossicularness and/or the proximateness happens.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the hunting does not occur.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis;
both the non-diagonalizableness and the non-bibliopolicness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hunting does not occur and the feeling does not occur does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the easiness does not occur. sent2: that the icing does not occur and the prawning does not occur is triggered by the Avestan. sent3: if the folding babka happens the beeping intention does not occur and the Edwardianness does not occur. sent4: the hunting does not occur if that the ossicularness happens is not wrong. sent5: if the Down occurs the assaying does not occur and the platinizing leeward does not occur. sent6: that the folding stern occurs results in that the easiness does not occur. sent7: if that the hunt but not the ossicularness occurs is incorrect then the diagonalizableness does not occur. sent8: the folding pansy does not occur and the Faustianness does not occur. sent9: that the hunt does not occur is triggered by the ossicularness and/or that the proximateness occurs. sent10: the descanting does not occur and the platinizing Dexedrine does not occur. sent11: the feeling triggers that both the non-bibliopolicness and the proximateness occurs. sent12: the folding stern happens. sent13: the fact that the easiness happens but the platinizing fistmele does not occur is not true. sent14: either the beeping roadhog or the platinizing baron or both prevents the shuttingness. sent15: that the puritanicalness occurs is not false. sent16: the feeling does not occur. sent17: if the proximateness does not occur the fact that the easiness but not the platinizing fistmele happens does not hold. sent18: if the proximateness does not occur then the fact that the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur is not true. sent19: that the folding stern happens results in that the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the proximateness does not occur.; sent18 & assump1 -> int1: that that the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur is not correct is not wrong.; sent19 & sent12 -> int2: the easiness does not occur and the platinizing fistmele does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the proximateness occurs.; int4 -> int5: the ossicularness and/or the proximateness happens.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: the hunting does not occur.; int6 & sent16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__