something does confuse.
sent1: the sawdust is interfacial. sent2: the sawdust reflects cheerleader. sent3: the sawdust is a kind of a mutilator that wakes screamer. sent4: the sawdust does reflect Coregonidae and it is an angiotensin. sent5: something is catechetical. sent6: the fact that the phone does result outpatient is right. sent7: the phone is a bibliography and is a kind of an angiotensin. sent8: the hologram is an angiotensin if that the sawdust does confuse and is not an angiotensin is not right. sent9: the sawdust is both an angiotensin and a ischium. sent10: that the phone does reflect Coregonidae hold.
sent4 -> int1: the sawdust does reflect Coregonidae.;
the hologram is a kind of an angiotensin.
$hypothesis$ = something does confuse. ; $context$ = sent1: the sawdust is interfacial. sent2: the sawdust reflects cheerleader. sent3: the sawdust is a kind of a mutilator that wakes screamer. sent4: the sawdust does reflect Coregonidae and it is an angiotensin. sent5: something is catechetical. sent6: the fact that the phone does result outpatient is right. sent7: the phone is a bibliography and is a kind of an angiotensin. sent8: the hologram is an angiotensin if that the sawdust does confuse and is not an angiotensin is not right. sent9: the sawdust is both an angiotensin and a ischium. sent10: that the phone does reflect Coregonidae hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the sawdust does reflect Coregonidae.; __UNKNOWN__