either the coarctation happens or the effacing shepherdess does not occur or both.
sent1: that the resale does not occur and the menstruating saddlecloth does not occur prevents that the scamper occurs. sent2: if that not the write-in but the nourishing occurs is false the ramping does not occur. sent3: the nobbling occurs if the fact that the coarctation happens and/or the effacing shepherdess does not occur is not correct. sent4: if the diffraction does not occur then that both the narration and the haze happens is not true. sent5: that the walkabout does not occur and the selflessness does not occur prevents the surface-to-airness. sent6: the fact that the non-Shakespearianness and the exponentiation occurs is not correct if the effacing tannery does not occur. sent7: if that the fringing happens and the tinning Wykehamist does not occur is not right the effacing tannery does not occur. sent8: the walkabout does not occur and the selflessness does not occur if the ramp does not occur. sent9: if the roofing headshake does not occur the hassle does not occur. sent10: the biblioticsness does not occur if the energeticness does not occur and the effacing floriculture occurs. sent11: that the hassle does not occur and the scamper does not occur is false if the nobbling occurs. sent12: if the scamper occurs then the fact that the coarctation happens or the effacing shepherdess does not occur or both is incorrect. sent13: that if that that both the non-Shakespearianness and the exponentiation happens is not right is not false the diffraction does not occur is right. sent14: if that the roofing headshake does not occur and/or the effacing tetrode happens is false then the fact that the hassle happens hold. sent15: if the resale happens then that either the roofing headshake does not occur or the effacing tetrode happens or both is not correct. sent16: if the fact that the multilingualness does not occur and the tinning absorbency does not occur does not hold then the electromechanicalness does not occur. sent17: if the Continentalness happens that the fringing but not the tinning Wykehamist happens is not right. sent18: the hassle does not occur if the effacing tetrode does not occur. sent19: if the biblioticsness does not occur the resale and the menstruating saddlecloth happens. sent20: the fact that the multilingualness does not occur and the tinning absorbency does not occur is false if the haze does not occur. sent21: the haze does not occur if the fact that the narration occurs and the haze occurs is false. sent22: the resale does not occur and the menstruating saddlecloth does not occur. sent23: that the amaranthineness occurs and/or the carbonylness is triggered by the non-surface-to-airness. sent24: the non-electromechanicalness causes that the energeticness does not occur but the effacing floriculture occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that either the coarctation happens or the effacing shepherdess does not occur or both is not correct is not false.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the nobbling occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the hassle does not occur and the scamper does not occur is false.; sent1 & sent22 -> int3: the fact that the scamper does not occur is not incorrect.;
the fact that either the coarctation occurs or the effacing shepherdess does not occur or both does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = either the coarctation happens or the effacing shepherdess does not occur or both. ; $context$ = sent1: that the resale does not occur and the menstruating saddlecloth does not occur prevents that the scamper occurs. sent2: if that not the write-in but the nourishing occurs is false the ramping does not occur. sent3: the nobbling occurs if the fact that the coarctation happens and/or the effacing shepherdess does not occur is not correct. sent4: if the diffraction does not occur then that both the narration and the haze happens is not true. sent5: that the walkabout does not occur and the selflessness does not occur prevents the surface-to-airness. sent6: the fact that the non-Shakespearianness and the exponentiation occurs is not correct if the effacing tannery does not occur. sent7: if that the fringing happens and the tinning Wykehamist does not occur is not right the effacing tannery does not occur. sent8: the walkabout does not occur and the selflessness does not occur if the ramp does not occur. sent9: if the roofing headshake does not occur the hassle does not occur. sent10: the biblioticsness does not occur if the energeticness does not occur and the effacing floriculture occurs. sent11: that the hassle does not occur and the scamper does not occur is false if the nobbling occurs. sent12: if the scamper occurs then the fact that the coarctation happens or the effacing shepherdess does not occur or both is incorrect. sent13: that if that that both the non-Shakespearianness and the exponentiation happens is not right is not false the diffraction does not occur is right. sent14: if that the roofing headshake does not occur and/or the effacing tetrode happens is false then the fact that the hassle happens hold. sent15: if the resale happens then that either the roofing headshake does not occur or the effacing tetrode happens or both is not correct. sent16: if the fact that the multilingualness does not occur and the tinning absorbency does not occur does not hold then the electromechanicalness does not occur. sent17: if the Continentalness happens that the fringing but not the tinning Wykehamist happens is not right. sent18: the hassle does not occur if the effacing tetrode does not occur. sent19: if the biblioticsness does not occur the resale and the menstruating saddlecloth happens. sent20: the fact that the multilingualness does not occur and the tinning absorbency does not occur is false if the haze does not occur. sent21: the haze does not occur if the fact that the narration occurs and the haze occurs is false. sent22: the resale does not occur and the menstruating saddlecloth does not occur. sent23: that the amaranthineness occurs and/or the carbonylness is triggered by the non-surface-to-airness. sent24: the non-electromechanicalness causes that the energeticness does not occur but the effacing floriculture occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the fact that either the coarctation happens or the effacing shepherdess does not occur or both is not correct is not false.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the nobbling occurs.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: that the hassle does not occur and the scamper does not occur is false.; sent1 & sent22 -> int3: the fact that the scamper does not occur is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__