the fact that the driveller does not reflectorize maverick and/or it is not a eulogy does not hold.
sent1: if the smelt is minus then the likeness does precipitate. sent2: the smelt does not tweak. sent3: if the driveller is not futuristic it does not reflectorize maverick or is a kind of a eulogy or both. sent4: the driveller does not reflectorize maverick or is a kind of a eulogy or both. sent5: that the smelt is both an underclass and minus is false. sent6: that the driveller does reflectorize maverick and/or it is not a eulogy is not incorrect if it is not futuristic. sent7: if the likeness is a eulogy but it is not minus then the demoniac is not a eulogy. sent8: if the demoniac does tweak then it is not a precipitate. sent9: if the driveller is futuristic the demoniac does tweak. sent10: the demoniac does precipitate if the likeness is a precipitate. sent11: if the fact that either something is a precipitate or it is futuristic or both is not correct it does not reflectorize smelt. sent12: the likeness does precipitate if the fact that the fact that the smelt is an underclass and is not minus does not hold is not wrong. sent13: if that the smelt is an underclass but it is not futuristic is not true the fact that the driveller is minus is not false. sent14: if something is not a eulogy that it is a precipitate and/or it is futuristic is not right. sent15: the driveller reflectorizes maverick and/or it is not a kind of a eulogy. sent16: if something that does not tweak does not precipitate it is futuristic. sent17: the fact that the smelt is an underclass that is not minus is not correct. sent18: that the likeness is not a Almaty is correct. sent19: if the driveller is not futuristic then it does not reflectorize maverick and/or is not a eulogy.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the driveller is futuristic.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the demoniac tweaks.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the demoniac is not a precipitate.; sent12 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the likeness is not a precipitate is not right.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the demoniac does precipitate.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the driveller is not futuristic.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis;
that either the driveller does not reflectorize maverick or it is not a eulogy or both is false.
sent16 -> int7: the demoniac is not non-futuristic if it does not tweak and does not precipitate.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the driveller does not reflectorize maverick and/or it is not a eulogy does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the smelt is minus then the likeness does precipitate. sent2: the smelt does not tweak. sent3: if the driveller is not futuristic it does not reflectorize maverick or is a kind of a eulogy or both. sent4: the driveller does not reflectorize maverick or is a kind of a eulogy or both. sent5: that the smelt is both an underclass and minus is false. sent6: that the driveller does reflectorize maverick and/or it is not a eulogy is not incorrect if it is not futuristic. sent7: if the likeness is a eulogy but it is not minus then the demoniac is not a eulogy. sent8: if the demoniac does tweak then it is not a precipitate. sent9: if the driveller is futuristic the demoniac does tweak. sent10: the demoniac does precipitate if the likeness is a precipitate. sent11: if the fact that either something is a precipitate or it is futuristic or both is not correct it does not reflectorize smelt. sent12: the likeness does precipitate if the fact that the fact that the smelt is an underclass and is not minus does not hold is not wrong. sent13: if that the smelt is an underclass but it is not futuristic is not true the fact that the driveller is minus is not false. sent14: if something is not a eulogy that it is a precipitate and/or it is futuristic is not right. sent15: the driveller reflectorizes maverick and/or it is not a kind of a eulogy. sent16: if something that does not tweak does not precipitate it is futuristic. sent17: the fact that the smelt is an underclass that is not minus is not correct. sent18: that the likeness is not a Almaty is correct. sent19: if the driveller is not futuristic then it does not reflectorize maverick and/or is not a eulogy. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the driveller is futuristic.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the demoniac tweaks.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the demoniac is not a precipitate.; sent12 & sent17 -> int3: the fact that the likeness is not a precipitate is not right.; sent10 & int3 -> int4: the demoniac does precipitate.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the driveller is not futuristic.; int6 & sent19 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__