the lesbianism does ankylose.
sent1: if the leopardess is not a Ferocactus but it ankyloses then that the lesbianism does not ankyloses is not false. sent2: that the scrubland is onside hold. sent3: if the scrubland is onside it is nonsteroidal. sent4: the fact that the leopardess is not a vara and is a kind of a smart is correct if something is a kind of a Israeli. sent5: the leopardess is pragmatic and it is optical if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Ferocactus is not false. sent6: if there exists something such that it is smart the wit is not a barrette. sent7: the fact that something is not a Laricariidae but it is optical is not correct if it dives Negaprion. sent8: the leopardess does ankylose if the spadix does ankylose. sent9: the enforcer is not Israeli if the fact that the scrubland is a kind of evangelistic thing that does not dote does not hold. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is Israeli hold. sent11: if the fact that the enforcer is not a Israeli is true then the wince is a kind of a smart that is a vara. sent12: if something is not a pragmatic it is a kind of a Ferocactus and it is a smart. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a Ferocactus. sent14: a pragmatic is a kind of a Laricariidae. sent15: that the lesbianism does ankylose is right if something that is a kind of a barrette is a Laricariidae. sent16: the rheum does dive Negaprion. sent17: something is a barrette if it is smart. sent18: if something is nonsteroidal then that it is a kind of evangelistic thing that does not dote is false. sent19: the spadix does ankylose or it is a pragmatic or both if the wit is not a barrette.
sent13 & sent5 -> int1: the leopardess is a pragmatic and optical.; int1 -> int2: the leopardess is a pragmatic.; sent14 -> int3: the leopardess is a kind of a Laricariidae if it is a kind of a pragmatic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the leopardess is a Laricariidae.; sent17 -> int5: the leopardess is a barrette if it is a smart.; sent10 & sent4 -> int6: that the leopardess is not a vara but it is smart is true.; int6 -> int7: the leopardess is a smart.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the leopardess is a kind of a barrette.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the leopardess is a barrette and it is a Laricariidae.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a barrette and it is a kind of a Laricariidae.; int10 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
the shoe-shop is a kind of a smart.
sent12 -> int11: if the shoe-shop is not a pragmatic it is both a Ferocactus and smart.;
$hypothesis$ = the lesbianism does ankylose. ; $context$ = sent1: if the leopardess is not a Ferocactus but it ankyloses then that the lesbianism does not ankyloses is not false. sent2: that the scrubland is onside hold. sent3: if the scrubland is onside it is nonsteroidal. sent4: the fact that the leopardess is not a vara and is a kind of a smart is correct if something is a kind of a Israeli. sent5: the leopardess is pragmatic and it is optical if there is something such that the fact that it is not a Ferocactus is not false. sent6: if there exists something such that it is smart the wit is not a barrette. sent7: the fact that something is not a Laricariidae but it is optical is not correct if it dives Negaprion. sent8: the leopardess does ankylose if the spadix does ankylose. sent9: the enforcer is not Israeli if the fact that the scrubland is a kind of evangelistic thing that does not dote does not hold. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is Israeli hold. sent11: if the fact that the enforcer is not a Israeli is true then the wince is a kind of a smart that is a vara. sent12: if something is not a pragmatic it is a kind of a Ferocactus and it is a smart. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a Ferocactus. sent14: a pragmatic is a kind of a Laricariidae. sent15: that the lesbianism does ankylose is right if something that is a kind of a barrette is a Laricariidae. sent16: the rheum does dive Negaprion. sent17: something is a barrette if it is smart. sent18: if something is nonsteroidal then that it is a kind of evangelistic thing that does not dote is false. sent19: the spadix does ankylose or it is a pragmatic or both if the wit is not a barrette. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent5 -> int1: the leopardess is a pragmatic and optical.; int1 -> int2: the leopardess is a pragmatic.; sent14 -> int3: the leopardess is a kind of a Laricariidae if it is a kind of a pragmatic.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the leopardess is a Laricariidae.; sent17 -> int5: the leopardess is a barrette if it is a smart.; sent10 & sent4 -> int6: that the leopardess is not a vara but it is smart is true.; int6 -> int7: the leopardess is a smart.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the leopardess is a kind of a barrette.; int4 & int8 -> int9: the leopardess is a barrette and it is a Laricariidae.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it is a barrette and it is a kind of a Laricariidae.; int10 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__