the fact that the non-epiduralness and the dormantness occurs does not hold.
sent1: if the kidnapping dinky happens then the epiduralness does not occur. sent2: that both the autacoidalness and the non-synapticness happens does not hold if the whelping showplace does not occur. sent3: if that the collateralness does not occur is correct that the whelping Dnieper but not the inspection occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the whelping Antichrist but not the gluttonousness happens. sent5: the fact that the antrorseness occurs is true. sent6: the stylization occurs if the Piagetianness occurs. sent7: the fact that the pelting does not occur is correct. sent8: the fact that the whelping Shrovetide does not occur hold. sent9: that the whelping giantess and the non-adrenergicness occurs is not right if the entail does not occur. sent10: the fact that the sexism happens but the bombing does not occur is false. sent11: the whelping Joffrey causes that the kidnapping dinky happens. sent12: the discriminating does not occur if that the sexism occurs and the bombing does not occur does not hold. sent13: the dioeciousness does not occur. sent14: that the inspection happens is caused by that the synapticness happens. sent15: if the discriminating does not occur the antrorseness happens. sent16: that the autacoidalness happens and the synapticness happens does not hold. sent17: the scream does not occur. sent18: if the sexism does not occur the discriminatingness does not occur. sent19: the questing does not occur. sent20: if the collateral does not occur then the whelping Dnieper happens. sent21: the whelping showplace prevents that the whelping Joffrey does not occur. sent22: the fact that the cronyism does not occur hold. sent23: the whelping Dnieper occurs. sent24: if the whelping showplace does not occur then that both the autacoidalness and the synapticness happens is not correct. sent25: the over-the-counterness occurs. sent26: that that the nonionicness happens and the phase-out does not occur is true is not true. sent27: that the collateralness does not occur is correct. sent28: if the discriminating does not occur the dormantness occurs and the antrorseness happens. sent29: the inspection occurs if the fact that the autacoidalness but not the synapticness happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whelping showplace does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the autacoidalness happens but the synapticness does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent29 -> int2: the inspection happens.; sent3 & sent27 -> int3: the whelping Dnieper happens but the inspection does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the inspection does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the whelping showplace occurs.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the whelping Joffrey occurs.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the kidnapping dinky occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the epidural does not occur.; sent12 & sent10 -> int10: the discriminatingness does not occur.; sent28 & int10 -> int11: the dormantness occurs and the antrorseness happens.; int11 -> int12: the dormantness happens.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the non-epiduralness and the dormantness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the kidnapping dinky happens then the epiduralness does not occur. sent2: that both the autacoidalness and the non-synapticness happens does not hold if the whelping showplace does not occur. sent3: if that the collateralness does not occur is correct that the whelping Dnieper but not the inspection occurs is not incorrect. sent4: the whelping Antichrist but not the gluttonousness happens. sent5: the fact that the antrorseness occurs is true. sent6: the stylization occurs if the Piagetianness occurs. sent7: the fact that the pelting does not occur is correct. sent8: the fact that the whelping Shrovetide does not occur hold. sent9: that the whelping giantess and the non-adrenergicness occurs is not right if the entail does not occur. sent10: the fact that the sexism happens but the bombing does not occur is false. sent11: the whelping Joffrey causes that the kidnapping dinky happens. sent12: the discriminating does not occur if that the sexism occurs and the bombing does not occur does not hold. sent13: the dioeciousness does not occur. sent14: that the inspection happens is caused by that the synapticness happens. sent15: if the discriminating does not occur the antrorseness happens. sent16: that the autacoidalness happens and the synapticness happens does not hold. sent17: the scream does not occur. sent18: if the sexism does not occur the discriminatingness does not occur. sent19: the questing does not occur. sent20: if the collateral does not occur then the whelping Dnieper happens. sent21: the whelping showplace prevents that the whelping Joffrey does not occur. sent22: the fact that the cronyism does not occur hold. sent23: the whelping Dnieper occurs. sent24: if the whelping showplace does not occur then that both the autacoidalness and the synapticness happens is not correct. sent25: the over-the-counterness occurs. sent26: that that the nonionicness happens and the phase-out does not occur is true is not true. sent27: that the collateralness does not occur is correct. sent28: if the discriminating does not occur the dormantness occurs and the antrorseness happens. sent29: the inspection occurs if the fact that the autacoidalness but not the synapticness happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whelping showplace does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: that the autacoidalness happens but the synapticness does not occur is not true.; int1 & sent29 -> int2: the inspection happens.; sent3 & sent27 -> int3: the whelping Dnieper happens but the inspection does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the inspection does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the whelping showplace occurs.; int6 & sent21 -> int7: the whelping Joffrey occurs.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the kidnapping dinky occurs.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the epidural does not occur.; sent12 & sent10 -> int10: the discriminatingness does not occur.; sent28 & int10 -> int11: the dormantness occurs and the antrorseness happens.; int11 -> int12: the dormantness happens.; int9 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__