the vigilante does cling mermaid.
sent1: the whalesucker does untune pyelography. sent2: the whalesucker resects whalesucker. sent3: the whalesucker does cling mermaid. sent4: if the vigilante does cling mermaid and is not unable then the fact that the whalesucker is not lexical is not wrong. sent5: the whalesucker is a isometric and is unable. sent6: the vigilante does not cling mermaid if the whalesucker is lexical but it is not a duration. sent7: the whalesucker is not a kind of a duration. sent8: something is lexical if it is a kind of a isometric. sent9: the fact that the joss discards and is not a duration hold.
sent5 -> int1: the whalesucker is isometric.; sent8 -> int2: if the whalesucker is a isometric then it is lexical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the whalesucker is lexical.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the whalesucker is lexical and is not a kind of a duration.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the vigilante does cling mermaid. ; $context$ = sent1: the whalesucker does untune pyelography. sent2: the whalesucker resects whalesucker. sent3: the whalesucker does cling mermaid. sent4: if the vigilante does cling mermaid and is not unable then the fact that the whalesucker is not lexical is not wrong. sent5: the whalesucker is a isometric and is unable. sent6: the vigilante does not cling mermaid if the whalesucker is lexical but it is not a duration. sent7: the whalesucker is not a kind of a duration. sent8: something is lexical if it is a kind of a isometric. sent9: the fact that the joss discards and is not a duration hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the whalesucker is isometric.; sent8 -> int2: if the whalesucker is a isometric then it is lexical.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the whalesucker is lexical.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the whalesucker is lexical and is not a kind of a duration.; int4 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__