the teller is a segregationism.
sent1: the fact that the thulium is non-floricultural a segregationism does not hold. sent2: if that the eyepiece is not a hacksaw but a chlorothiazide is false it does post flighted. sent3: the teller does not think Tartary but it is a kind of a gynophore. sent4: the thulium is a segregationism if the teller is a hacksaw. sent5: the mimic does repress. sent6: the mimic is a hacksaw if the thulium is a gynophore. sent7: if the teller does post flighted then the mimic is a kind of a segregationism. sent8: if the mimic is a hacksaw then the eyepiece does post flighted. sent9: if that the teller is a segregationism is not wrong then the mimic is both not a segregationism and a chlorothiazide. sent10: if that the mimic is both not a gynophore and a chlorothiazide does not hold it does post flighted. sent11: that the thulium is not a kind of a gynophore does not hold. sent12: if the mimic is not a kind of a segregationism it does post flighted. sent13: the tetrasporangium is not perinatal but it is a segregationism. sent14: that the mimic is not a gynophore but a chlorothiazide is not right. sent15: the thulium is a segregationism. sent16: if the mimic does post flighted the eyepiece is a hacksaw. sent17: the thulium is not a kind of a hacksaw but it is floricultural if that the eyepiece is a hacksaw is not wrong.
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the mimic does post flighted.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the eyepiece is a hacksaw.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the thulium is not a hacksaw but it is floricultural is right.; int3 -> int4: that the thulium is not a hacksaw hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the teller is a segregationism. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the thulium is non-floricultural a segregationism does not hold. sent2: if that the eyepiece is not a hacksaw but a chlorothiazide is false it does post flighted. sent3: the teller does not think Tartary but it is a kind of a gynophore. sent4: the thulium is a segregationism if the teller is a hacksaw. sent5: the mimic does repress. sent6: the mimic is a hacksaw if the thulium is a gynophore. sent7: if the teller does post flighted then the mimic is a kind of a segregationism. sent8: if the mimic is a hacksaw then the eyepiece does post flighted. sent9: if that the teller is a segregationism is not wrong then the mimic is both not a segregationism and a chlorothiazide. sent10: if that the mimic is both not a gynophore and a chlorothiazide does not hold it does post flighted. sent11: that the thulium is not a kind of a gynophore does not hold. sent12: if the mimic is not a kind of a segregationism it does post flighted. sent13: the tetrasporangium is not perinatal but it is a segregationism. sent14: that the mimic is not a gynophore but a chlorothiazide is not right. sent15: the thulium is a segregationism. sent16: if the mimic does post flighted the eyepiece is a hacksaw. sent17: the thulium is not a kind of a hacksaw but it is floricultural if that the eyepiece is a hacksaw is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent14 -> int1: the mimic does post flighted.; sent16 & int1 -> int2: the eyepiece is a hacksaw.; sent17 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the thulium is not a hacksaw but it is floricultural is right.; int3 -> int4: that the thulium is not a hacksaw hold.; __UNKNOWN__