the fact that the misanthrope does open transfer and is not a kind of a pelvimeter does not hold.
sent1: everything rolls Testudo and it does open transfer. sent2: the fact that the chambray is not violent but it does wax does not hold. sent3: that the transfer is not estrogenic and it is not a pelvimeter does not hold. sent4: the fact that the misanthrope is violent but it is not a kind of a pelvimeter is incorrect. sent5: if the chambray does open mortgagor it is a kind of non-violent thing that is a wax. sent6: that the chambray is violent and it is a wax does not hold. sent7: if the chambray is a stover it is a Nuptse. sent8: something is a stover if it does not open mortgagor. sent9: if the chambray is a kind of a Nuptse the fact that that the misanthrope is a kind of estrogenic thing that is not a rupture hold does not hold. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not estrogenic and not a pelvimeter is wrong then the misanthrope is estrogenic. sent11: if something is a rupture it is a stover. sent12: if the fact that something is estrogenic thing that is not a kind of a rupture is not right then it is not a pelvimeter.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chambray does open mortgagor.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the chambray is not violent but it waxes.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the chambray does not open mortgagor.; sent8 -> int4: the chambray is a stover if the fact that it does not open mortgagor is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the chambray is a kind of a stover.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the chambray is a Nuptse.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the misanthrope is estrogenic but not a rupture is not true.; sent12 -> int8: the misanthrope is not a kind of a pelvimeter if that it is both estrogenic and not a rupture does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the misanthrope is not a pelvimeter.; sent1 -> int10: the misanthrope rolls Testudo and it opens transfer.; int10 -> int11: the misanthrope does open transfer.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis;
the embodiment does open mortgagor.
sent11 -> int12: the misanthrope is a kind of a stover if it is a rupture.; sent3 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is non-estrogenic and it is not a kind of a pelvimeter is incorrect.; int13 & sent10 -> int14: the misanthrope is estrogenic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the misanthrope does open transfer and is not a kind of a pelvimeter does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: everything rolls Testudo and it does open transfer. sent2: the fact that the chambray is not violent but it does wax does not hold. sent3: that the transfer is not estrogenic and it is not a pelvimeter does not hold. sent4: the fact that the misanthrope is violent but it is not a kind of a pelvimeter is incorrect. sent5: if the chambray does open mortgagor it is a kind of non-violent thing that is a wax. sent6: that the chambray is violent and it is a wax does not hold. sent7: if the chambray is a stover it is a Nuptse. sent8: something is a stover if it does not open mortgagor. sent9: if the chambray is a kind of a Nuptse the fact that that the misanthrope is a kind of estrogenic thing that is not a rupture hold does not hold. sent10: if there is something such that the fact that it is both not estrogenic and not a pelvimeter is wrong then the misanthrope is estrogenic. sent11: if something is a rupture it is a stover. sent12: if the fact that something is estrogenic thing that is not a kind of a rupture is not right then it is not a pelvimeter. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the chambray does open mortgagor.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the chambray is not violent but it waxes.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the chambray does not open mortgagor.; sent8 -> int4: the chambray is a stover if the fact that it does not open mortgagor is correct.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the chambray is a kind of a stover.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: the chambray is a Nuptse.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the fact that the misanthrope is estrogenic but not a rupture is not true.; sent12 -> int8: the misanthrope is not a kind of a pelvimeter if that it is both estrogenic and not a rupture does not hold.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the misanthrope is not a pelvimeter.; sent1 -> int10: the misanthrope rolls Testudo and it opens transfer.; int10 -> int11: the misanthrope does open transfer.; int9 & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__