that the reservation happens and/or the reciprocating does not occur is not true.
sent1: the self-service occurs. sent2: that the passing unpersuasiveness does not occur but the Epicureanness occurs is not false if the stoichiometricness occurs. sent3: the fact that the reservation happens and/or the reciprocating does not occur is correct if the handout does not occur. sent4: that either the gainer or the providence or both happens is brought about by that the huing Sphyraenidae does not occur. sent5: both the violence and the forteness occurs if the sally does not occur. sent6: the fact that the fact that both the peripeteia and the handout happens hold is false if the reciprocating does not occur. sent7: not the ball but the huing ruse happens if the topographicalness occurs. sent8: that the self-serviceness does not occur but the monochromaticness happens is brought about by that the implacableness happens. sent9: if the flip-flop does not occur then the reforestation happens and/or the accommodativeness occurs. sent10: that the rope does not occur is triggered by that the implacableness does not occur. sent11: the roping does not occur. sent12: the violence prevents that the reciprocating occurs. sent13: the saponaceousness occurs and/or the honoring occurs. sent14: the handout does not occur and the rope does not occur if the fact that the implacableness does not occur hold. sent15: that the implacableness does not occur or the roping does not occur or both prevents the enema. sent16: the peripeteia does not occur if that the peripeteia happens and the handout occurs is not true. sent17: the naming occurs and/or the electricalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the implacableness occurs is correct.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the self-service does not occur but the monochromaticness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the self-serviceness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the implacableness does not occur.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the handout does not occur and the roping does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the handout does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the peripeteia does not occur and the enema does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the reservation happens and/or the reciprocating does not occur is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the self-service occurs. sent2: that the passing unpersuasiveness does not occur but the Epicureanness occurs is not false if the stoichiometricness occurs. sent3: the fact that the reservation happens and/or the reciprocating does not occur is correct if the handout does not occur. sent4: that either the gainer or the providence or both happens is brought about by that the huing Sphyraenidae does not occur. sent5: both the violence and the forteness occurs if the sally does not occur. sent6: the fact that the fact that both the peripeteia and the handout happens hold is false if the reciprocating does not occur. sent7: not the ball but the huing ruse happens if the topographicalness occurs. sent8: that the self-serviceness does not occur but the monochromaticness happens is brought about by that the implacableness happens. sent9: if the flip-flop does not occur then the reforestation happens and/or the accommodativeness occurs. sent10: that the rope does not occur is triggered by that the implacableness does not occur. sent11: the roping does not occur. sent12: the violence prevents that the reciprocating occurs. sent13: the saponaceousness occurs and/or the honoring occurs. sent14: the handout does not occur and the rope does not occur if the fact that the implacableness does not occur hold. sent15: that the implacableness does not occur or the roping does not occur or both prevents the enema. sent16: the peripeteia does not occur if that the peripeteia happens and the handout occurs is not true. sent17: the naming occurs and/or the electricalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the implacableness occurs is correct.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the self-service does not occur but the monochromaticness occurs.; int1 -> int2: the self-serviceness does not occur.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the implacableness does not occur.; int4 & sent14 -> int5: the handout does not occur and the roping does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the handout does not occur.; int6 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__