the fact that if the hansom is a pompon that that the thruster is not a internalization but a fundus hold is not true is false.
sent1: the thruster is not a internalization and is a fundus. sent2: the mutterer is not a internalization but it is exodontics. sent3: if that the hansom is a kind of a pompon hold then the mutterer is both not a fundus and exodontics. sent4: if the hansom is a pompon then the fact that the thruster is a internalization and a fundus does not hold. sent5: if the mutterer is a fundus the fact that the hansom is not a kind of a pompon and is exodontics is not right. sent6: the thruster is not a internalization and is exodontics. sent7: the mutterer is not a pompon. sent8: the fact that the thruster is a internalization and it is a fundus is not correct if the fact that the mutterer is not a fundus hold. sent9: that the thruster is not a internalization but a fundus does not hold if the mutterer is not a kind of a fundus. sent10: if the mutterer is not a kind of a fundus the thruster is not a internalization but it is a fundus. sent11: the mutterer is exodontics if the hansom is a kind of a pompon. sent12: the mutterer is exodontics. sent13: the thruster is not a kind of a internalization and is a fundus if the hansom is a kind of a pompon. sent14: the fact that the fact that the thruster is a internalization and it is a fundus is correct is not right.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hansom is a pompon.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the mutterer is both not a fundus and exodontics.; int1 -> int2: the mutterer is not a fundus.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the thruster is not a internalization but it is a fundus is false.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the hansom is a pompon that that the thruster is not a internalization but a fundus hold is not true is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the thruster is not a internalization and is a fundus. sent2: the mutterer is not a internalization but it is exodontics. sent3: if that the hansom is a kind of a pompon hold then the mutterer is both not a fundus and exodontics. sent4: if the hansom is a pompon then the fact that the thruster is a internalization and a fundus does not hold. sent5: if the mutterer is a fundus the fact that the hansom is not a kind of a pompon and is exodontics is not right. sent6: the thruster is not a internalization and is exodontics. sent7: the mutterer is not a pompon. sent8: the fact that the thruster is a internalization and it is a fundus is not correct if the fact that the mutterer is not a fundus hold. sent9: that the thruster is not a internalization but a fundus does not hold if the mutterer is not a kind of a fundus. sent10: if the mutterer is not a kind of a fundus the thruster is not a internalization but it is a fundus. sent11: the mutterer is exodontics if the hansom is a kind of a pompon. sent12: the mutterer is exodontics. sent13: the thruster is not a kind of a internalization and is a fundus if the hansom is a kind of a pompon. sent14: the fact that the fact that the thruster is a internalization and it is a fundus is correct is not right. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the hansom is a pompon.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the mutterer is both not a fundus and exodontics.; int1 -> int2: the mutterer is not a fundus.; sent9 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the thruster is not a internalization but it is a fundus is false.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__