that there is something such that if it is not an invitation and is useless then it is a church-state is not correct.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a Monsieur but an afterimage it does tinge goldstone. sent2: something that is a Lufkin and lapidates is footless. sent3: something is an invitation if it does not upgrade redemption and is a kind of a Mills. sent4: if the penuche is a kind of an invitation and it is useless then it is a church-state. sent5: if a non-primary thing is a conk it is a minimization. sent6: if something is an invitation and is useless it is a church-state. sent7: something is a church-state if it is not an invitation and is useless. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not bow interviewer and it is a hydroxide that it does lapidate is true. sent9: if the penuche is both not a beads and a layette then that it is useless hold. sent10: if the fact that the nightcap does not gang-rape and upgrades resonance is right that it does normalize sisterhood is not wrong. sent11: if something euphemizes and it does upgrade cusk it is acculturational. sent12: there exists something such that if it is an invitation and it is useless then it is a church-state. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Caloocan and it is a bruin it is a kind of a railhead. sent14: there is something such that if it is not locomotive and bows mikvah then it is a part-owner.
sent7 -> int1: if the penuche is not a kind of an invitation but it is useless the fact that that it is not a church-state is wrong is right.; int1 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a primary and it does conk it is a minimization.
sent5 -> int2: the Peruvian is a minimization if it is a kind of non-primary thing that is a conk.; int2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that if it is not an invitation and is useless then it is a church-state is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not a Monsieur but an afterimage it does tinge goldstone. sent2: something that is a Lufkin and lapidates is footless. sent3: something is an invitation if it does not upgrade redemption and is a kind of a Mills. sent4: if the penuche is a kind of an invitation and it is useless then it is a church-state. sent5: if a non-primary thing is a conk it is a minimization. sent6: if something is an invitation and is useless it is a church-state. sent7: something is a church-state if it is not an invitation and is useless. sent8: there exists something such that if it does not bow interviewer and it is a hydroxide that it does lapidate is true. sent9: if the penuche is both not a beads and a layette then that it is useless hold. sent10: if the fact that the nightcap does not gang-rape and upgrades resonance is right that it does normalize sisterhood is not wrong. sent11: if something euphemizes and it does upgrade cusk it is acculturational. sent12: there exists something such that if it is an invitation and it is useless then it is a church-state. sent13: there is something such that if it is a kind of a Caloocan and it is a bruin it is a kind of a railhead. sent14: there is something such that if it is not locomotive and bows mikvah then it is a part-owner. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the penuche is not a kind of an invitation but it is useless the fact that that it is not a church-state is wrong is right.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__