the Irish pins curiousness if the clover exclaims whistling.
sent1: the physiologist is not a brougham. sent2: if a chelonian exclaims microphone it is not opposite. sent3: if the fact that the clover is not curious and it does not hypnotize Cnidosporidia is not true the Irish does pin curiousness. sent4: the clover does not exclaim whistling if it is not curious and it does hypnotize Cnidosporidia. sent5: if there is something such that it is shallow-draft then that the phalanger is not a diaphone and exclaims whistling is not right. sent6: if the Irish does not exclaim whistling then the clover is a kind of a putter and does pin curiousness. sent7: that the clover is not curious and does hypnotize Cnidosporidia is wrong. sent8: if the physiologist does not specialize and is not opposite the buttonhook is shallow-draft. sent9: the clover does not hypnotize Cnidosporidia. sent10: if the clover is not curious and does not hypnotize Cnidosporidia then it exclaims whistling. sent11: the physiologist does not specialize but it coopers if it is not a kind of a brougham. sent12: the Irish does pin curiousness if the fact that the clover hypnotizes Cnidosporidia is not wrong. sent13: the physiologist does exclaim microphone. sent14: the physiologist is not non-chelonian.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the clover does exclaim whistling.;
the clover putters.
sent11 & sent1 -> int1: the physiologist does not specialize and is a cooper.; int1 -> int2: the physiologist does not specialize.; sent2 -> int3: the physiologist is not opposite if it is a kind of chelonian thing that does exclaim microphone.; sent14 & sent13 -> int4: the physiologist is a chelonian and exclaims microphone.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the physiologist is not opposite.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the physiologist does not specialize and it is not opposite.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the buttonhook is shallow-draft.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it is shallow-draft.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the fact that the phalanger is not a diaphone and exclaims whistling does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a diaphone and it exclaims whistling is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the Irish pins curiousness if the clover exclaims whistling. ; $context$ = sent1: the physiologist is not a brougham. sent2: if a chelonian exclaims microphone it is not opposite. sent3: if the fact that the clover is not curious and it does not hypnotize Cnidosporidia is not true the Irish does pin curiousness. sent4: the clover does not exclaim whistling if it is not curious and it does hypnotize Cnidosporidia. sent5: if there is something such that it is shallow-draft then that the phalanger is not a diaphone and exclaims whistling is not right. sent6: if the Irish does not exclaim whistling then the clover is a kind of a putter and does pin curiousness. sent7: that the clover is not curious and does hypnotize Cnidosporidia is wrong. sent8: if the physiologist does not specialize and is not opposite the buttonhook is shallow-draft. sent9: the clover does not hypnotize Cnidosporidia. sent10: if the clover is not curious and does not hypnotize Cnidosporidia then it exclaims whistling. sent11: the physiologist does not specialize but it coopers if it is not a kind of a brougham. sent12: the Irish does pin curiousness if the fact that the clover hypnotizes Cnidosporidia is not wrong. sent13: the physiologist does exclaim microphone. sent14: the physiologist is not non-chelonian. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the clover does exclaim whistling.; __UNKNOWN__