that the Tamale does fear FDIC is correct.
sent1: the fact that the Anasazi is a telegraph is not wrong if it does gladden Rottweiler and it is not a kind of a rissole. sent2: the decalcification does gladden narwhal. sent3: something is a telegraph if it does not gladden Rottweiler and it is not a rissole. sent4: the fact that the Tamale is not a partiality but it gladdens Rottweiler does not hold if the Anasazi is a telegraph. sent5: if the Anasazi is not a partiality and it is not a rissole it gladdens Rottweiler. sent6: something does fear FDIC if it is not a kind of a partiality. sent7: if the Tamale is not a kind of a converse it gladdens narwhal. sent8: if something does not gladden Rottweiler but it is a rissole then it is a telegraph. sent9: if there exists something such that it does gladden Rottweiler the Anasazi does not gladden narwhal. sent10: something centers. sent11: the Tamale does fear FDIC if it does not gladden narwhal and it does not gladden Rottweiler. sent12: the fact that the Anasazi does not gladden Rottweiler and is not a rissole is not wrong if something is a kind of a centered. sent13: the Anasazi is not a lymphangiography and not matriarchal if there is something such that it is a kind of a rissole. sent14: if the Anasazi is a telegraph then that the Tamale does not gladden narwhal and is a partiality is false.
sent10 & sent12 -> int1: the Anasazi does not gladden Rottweiler and it is not a rissole.; sent3 -> int2: if the Anasazi does not gladden Rottweiler and it is not a kind of a rissole it is a telegraph.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Anasazi is a kind of a telegraph.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the Tamale does not gladden narwhal but it is a partiality is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = that the Tamale does fear FDIC is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Anasazi is a telegraph is not wrong if it does gladden Rottweiler and it is not a kind of a rissole. sent2: the decalcification does gladden narwhal. sent3: something is a telegraph if it does not gladden Rottweiler and it is not a rissole. sent4: the fact that the Tamale is not a partiality but it gladdens Rottweiler does not hold if the Anasazi is a telegraph. sent5: if the Anasazi is not a partiality and it is not a rissole it gladdens Rottweiler. sent6: something does fear FDIC if it is not a kind of a partiality. sent7: if the Tamale is not a kind of a converse it gladdens narwhal. sent8: if something does not gladden Rottweiler but it is a rissole then it is a telegraph. sent9: if there exists something such that it does gladden Rottweiler the Anasazi does not gladden narwhal. sent10: something centers. sent11: the Tamale does fear FDIC if it does not gladden narwhal and it does not gladden Rottweiler. sent12: the fact that the Anasazi does not gladden Rottweiler and is not a rissole is not wrong if something is a kind of a centered. sent13: the Anasazi is not a lymphangiography and not matriarchal if there is something such that it is a kind of a rissole. sent14: if the Anasazi is a telegraph then that the Tamale does not gladden narwhal and is a partiality is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent12 -> int1: the Anasazi does not gladden Rottweiler and it is not a rissole.; sent3 -> int2: if the Anasazi does not gladden Rottweiler and it is not a kind of a rissole it is a telegraph.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Anasazi is a kind of a telegraph.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the Tamale does not gladden narwhal but it is a partiality is not right.; __UNKNOWN__