the restrictiveness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the non-stylishness and the bomb happens does not hold if the Burmese does not occur. sent2: the restrictiveness occurs if the fact that the stylishness does not occur and the bomb occurs is incorrect. sent3: that the shafting theatrical does not occur yields that the evicting Galatian does not occur and the Burmese does not occur. sent4: if that the Z does not occur and the rogation does not occur is not correct the fact that the shafting theatrical does not occur hold. sent5: the Z happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Z does not occur and the rogation does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the Z does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Z does not occur and the rogation does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the shafting theatrical does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the evicting Galatian does not occur and the Burmeseness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the Burmeseness does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that not the stylishness but the bomb happens is incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the restrictiveness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the non-stylishness and the bomb happens does not hold if the Burmese does not occur. sent2: the restrictiveness occurs if the fact that the stylishness does not occur and the bomb occurs is incorrect. sent3: that the shafting theatrical does not occur yields that the evicting Galatian does not occur and the Burmese does not occur. sent4: if that the Z does not occur and the rogation does not occur is not correct the fact that the shafting theatrical does not occur hold. sent5: the Z happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Z does not occur and the rogation does not occur.; assump1 -> int1: the Z does not occur.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the Z does not occur and the rogation does not occur is not true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the shafting theatrical does not occur.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the evicting Galatian does not occur and the Burmeseness does not occur.; int5 -> int6: the Burmeseness does not occur.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that not the stylishness but the bomb happens is incorrect.; int7 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__