if the LGB is a bicentennial the fact that that the hexose is not a kind of a cataleptic and it does not underwrite halite is not correct hold.
sent1: the fact that the sassaby is not irrelevant and it is not a cataleptic is not right if the peppermint is a cerebrum. sent2: that the hexose is a kind of non-cataleptic thing that does underwrite halite is wrong. sent3: the peppermint is not irrelevant and does not underwrite halite if the hexose is a cataleptic. sent4: if something that does underwrite isochrone is a kind of a cataleptic the hexose underwrites halite. sent5: everything is irrelevant. sent6: that the hexose is a kind of a cataleptic that does not underwrite halite is not right if that the sassaby is a cerebrum hold. sent7: if something that is uninucleate is irrelevant then the minicar underwrites isochrone. sent8: the sassaby is a cerebrum if the minicar does underwrite isochrone. sent9: if the LGB is bicentennial then the hexose is not a kind of a cataleptic and it does not underwrite halite. sent10: if the archeologist is bicentennial then it underwrites halite. sent11: something is not non-irrelevant. sent12: if the LGB is bicentennial the peppermint is uninucleate. sent13: if the LGB is not uninucleate then the fireball is a bicentennial and it is chemoreceptive.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the LGB is bicentennial.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the peppermint is uninucleate.; sent5 -> int2: the peppermint is irrelevant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peppermint is uninucleate and it is irrelevant.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is both uninucleate and irrelevant.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the minicar does underwrite isochrone.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the sassaby is a cerebrum.;
the fact that the archeologist does not underwrite halite is not right.
$hypothesis$ = if the LGB is a bicentennial the fact that that the hexose is not a kind of a cataleptic and it does not underwrite halite is not correct hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sassaby is not irrelevant and it is not a cataleptic is not right if the peppermint is a cerebrum. sent2: that the hexose is a kind of non-cataleptic thing that does underwrite halite is wrong. sent3: the peppermint is not irrelevant and does not underwrite halite if the hexose is a cataleptic. sent4: if something that does underwrite isochrone is a kind of a cataleptic the hexose underwrites halite. sent5: everything is irrelevant. sent6: that the hexose is a kind of a cataleptic that does not underwrite halite is not right if that the sassaby is a cerebrum hold. sent7: if something that is uninucleate is irrelevant then the minicar underwrites isochrone. sent8: the sassaby is a cerebrum if the minicar does underwrite isochrone. sent9: if the LGB is bicentennial then the hexose is not a kind of a cataleptic and it does not underwrite halite. sent10: if the archeologist is bicentennial then it underwrites halite. sent11: something is not non-irrelevant. sent12: if the LGB is bicentennial the peppermint is uninucleate. sent13: if the LGB is not uninucleate then the fireball is a bicentennial and it is chemoreceptive. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the LGB is bicentennial.; sent12 & assump1 -> int1: the peppermint is uninucleate.; sent5 -> int2: the peppermint is irrelevant.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the peppermint is uninucleate and it is irrelevant.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that it is both uninucleate and irrelevant.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the minicar does underwrite isochrone.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the sassaby is a cerebrum.; __UNKNOWN__