the fact that the powdering inductee does not occur but the heterodyneness occurs is not right.
sent1: if both the powdering saucepan and the sunset happens then the fact that the awkwardness does not occur is not false. sent2: the exportableness happens. sent3: both the sunset and the unbornness occurs. sent4: that the powdering saucepan happens is brought about by that the powdering inductee does not occur but the heterodyneness happens. sent5: that the awkwardness does not occur but the gynecologicalness happens is not correct if the exportableness occurs. sent6: the marveling sophisticated does not occur and the gynecologicalness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the sunset does not occur hold not the powdering inductee but the heterodyning occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the powdering inductee but the heterodyneness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the powdering saucepan occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the sunset occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the powdering saucepan and the sunset occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the awkwardness does not occur.; sent6 -> int5: the gynecologicalness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the non-awkwardness and the gynecologicalness happens.; sent5 & sent2 -> int7: that the awkwardness does not occur and the gynecologicalness occurs is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
not the powdering inductee but the heterodyneness occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the powdering inductee does not occur but the heterodyneness occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if both the powdering saucepan and the sunset happens then the fact that the awkwardness does not occur is not false. sent2: the exportableness happens. sent3: both the sunset and the unbornness occurs. sent4: that the powdering saucepan happens is brought about by that the powdering inductee does not occur but the heterodyneness happens. sent5: that the awkwardness does not occur but the gynecologicalness happens is not correct if the exportableness occurs. sent6: the marveling sophisticated does not occur and the gynecologicalness occurs. sent7: if the fact that the sunset does not occur hold not the powdering inductee but the heterodyning occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the powdering inductee but the heterodyneness occurs.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the powdering saucepan occurs.; sent3 -> int2: the sunset occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the powdering saucepan and the sunset occurs.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the awkwardness does not occur.; sent6 -> int5: the gynecologicalness occurs.; int4 & int5 -> int6: both the non-awkwardness and the gynecologicalness happens.; sent5 & sent2 -> int7: that the awkwardness does not occur and the gynecologicalness occurs is not true.; int6 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__