the tanglebush does inflate.
sent1: if that the oximeter is a sawpit hold the Sno-cat does not uphold hyperthyroidism and is not altricial. sent2: the oximeter is a sawpit if the fact that the subcontractor is not a kind of a sawpit and is complete is wrong. sent3: that the quietist does not finalize mandator is correct if the fact that it is a kind of complete thing that finalize mandator does not hold. sent4: if the Sno-cat is not altricial then the fact that the quietist inflates but it does not finalize mandator is incorrect. sent5: the tanglebush does inflate if the fact that the quietist is not a kind of a sawpit but it does uphold hyperthyroidism is incorrect. sent6: if the subcontractor is not a farness then the fact that it is not a kind of a sawpit and it completes is not true. sent7: if something is not altricial then that it is not a sawpit and upholds hyperthyroidism is false. sent8: that the quietist completes and it does finalize mandator does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quietist is altricial.; sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the quietist does not finalize mandator.; sent7 -> int2: if the quietist is not altricial then the fact that it is not a sawpit and it upholds hyperthyroidism is not correct.;
that the tanglebush does not inflate is right.
$hypothesis$ = the tanglebush does inflate. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the oximeter is a sawpit hold the Sno-cat does not uphold hyperthyroidism and is not altricial. sent2: the oximeter is a sawpit if the fact that the subcontractor is not a kind of a sawpit and is complete is wrong. sent3: that the quietist does not finalize mandator is correct if the fact that it is a kind of complete thing that finalize mandator does not hold. sent4: if the Sno-cat is not altricial then the fact that the quietist inflates but it does not finalize mandator is incorrect. sent5: the tanglebush does inflate if the fact that the quietist is not a kind of a sawpit but it does uphold hyperthyroidism is incorrect. sent6: if the subcontractor is not a farness then the fact that it is not a kind of a sawpit and it completes is not true. sent7: if something is not altricial then that it is not a sawpit and upholds hyperthyroidism is false. sent8: that the quietist completes and it does finalize mandator does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quietist is altricial.; sent3 & sent8 -> int1: the quietist does not finalize mandator.; sent7 -> int2: if the quietist is not altricial then the fact that it is not a sawpit and it upholds hyperthyroidism is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__