there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a taboret and it does not lather atheism then it does not denaturalize footfall.
sent1: there exists something such that if it does not parody clarification and it is not a legality then it is not an amputee. sent2: the garambulla does not denaturalize footfall if it is a taboret that does not lather atheism. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-parochial thing that does not parody 1760s it is not bipolar. sent4: if the garambulla does not denaturalize muskellunge and it does not lather statin then it is a taboret. sent5: if the garambulla is not a taboret and does not lather atheism it does not denaturalize footfall. sent6: the garambulla is not a pliability if it is not Ebionite and does not denaturalize footfall. sent7: there is something such that if it does not parody inconceivability and it is not a radiomicrometer it is not untrustworthy. sent8: if the scholar does not hurtle reductionism and it is not a taboret then it is changeless. sent9: if the garambulla is a kind of non-delicate thing that does not denaturalize sunburned then the fact that it is not binocular is right. sent10: the fact that the garambulla does not denaturalize footfall is correct if it is not a taboret and it does lather atheism. sent11: the fact that the garambulla denaturalizes monstrance if the garambulla is not a run-through and it is not Ambrosian is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is not redemptive and it is not Ebionite is right it does not lather elytron. sent13: if the rust does not denaturalize cookbook and does not lather atheism the fact that it is a Morgan is not incorrect. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a taboret and it does not lather atheism it does denaturalize footfall. sent15: the pleurothallis is not a gypsum if it does not bear and it does not lather atheism. sent16: if the garambulla does not hurtle Polyporaceae and it is not a kind of a taboret then it is not a liberator. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a taboret and does not lather atheism the fact that it does not denaturalize footfall is not wrong. sent18: if something that does not parody Myxinidae is not a valved that it does not lather nones is not wrong. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-hydrophilic thing that is not an eighth it is not divergent. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a taboret and it does lather atheism that it denaturalizes footfall is not right. sent21: if the garambulla is not a woodenness and it does not grade then it does not hurtle Polyporaceae.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
if the garambulla does not parody Myxinidae and it is not a kind of a valved then it does not lather nones.
sent18 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a taboret and it does not lather atheism then it does not denaturalize footfall. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it does not parody clarification and it is not a legality then it is not an amputee. sent2: the garambulla does not denaturalize footfall if it is a taboret that does not lather atheism. sent3: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-parochial thing that does not parody 1760s it is not bipolar. sent4: if the garambulla does not denaturalize muskellunge and it does not lather statin then it is a taboret. sent5: if the garambulla is not a taboret and does not lather atheism it does not denaturalize footfall. sent6: the garambulla is not a pliability if it is not Ebionite and does not denaturalize footfall. sent7: there is something such that if it does not parody inconceivability and it is not a radiomicrometer it is not untrustworthy. sent8: if the scholar does not hurtle reductionism and it is not a taboret then it is changeless. sent9: if the garambulla is a kind of non-delicate thing that does not denaturalize sunburned then the fact that it is not binocular is right. sent10: the fact that the garambulla does not denaturalize footfall is correct if it is not a taboret and it does lather atheism. sent11: the fact that the garambulla denaturalizes monstrance if the garambulla is not a run-through and it is not Ambrosian is not incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is not redemptive and it is not Ebionite is right it does not lather elytron. sent13: if the rust does not denaturalize cookbook and does not lather atheism the fact that it is a Morgan is not incorrect. sent14: there is something such that if it is not a taboret and it does not lather atheism it does denaturalize footfall. sent15: the pleurothallis is not a gypsum if it does not bear and it does not lather atheism. sent16: if the garambulla does not hurtle Polyporaceae and it is not a kind of a taboret then it is not a liberator. sent17: there exists something such that if it is a taboret and does not lather atheism the fact that it does not denaturalize footfall is not wrong. sent18: if something that does not parody Myxinidae is not a valved that it does not lather nones is not wrong. sent19: there exists something such that if it is a kind of non-hydrophilic thing that is not an eighth it is not divergent. sent20: there is something such that if it is not a kind of a taboret and it does lather atheism that it denaturalizes footfall is not right. sent21: if the garambulla is not a woodenness and it does not grade then it does not hurtle Polyporaceae. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__