the Moselle is a Bridgetown.
sent1: if the acumen is exilic that the wood-fern is not a Dryden but it is a melatonin is wrong. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is uncared-for is not false. sent3: something that details Cercidiphyllum is a kind of a cresol. sent4: there is something such that it is creaseproof and it does not patinate braille. sent5: there are uncared-for and amino things. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a cresol then that the Moselle does detail wood-fern and/or it is a kind of a cresol is not incorrect. sent7: something is not amino. sent8: if the wood-fern is not a cresol then the Moselle details wood-fern and is a kind of a Bridgetown. sent9: if something is a Dryden then it does detail Cercidiphyllum. sent10: there exists something such that it is uncared-for and it is not amino. sent11: if something is an incidental and does not detail tractability then that the Moselle does not clangor boathouse is correct. sent12: the Moselle is not a kind of a Bridgetown if something is uncared-for but it is not an amino. sent13: something is not a subordinate. sent14: the numberplate is not a Bridgetown. sent15: the wood-fern is a kind of a Dryden if the fact that it is not a Dryden and it is a melatonin does not hold. sent16: the Moselle does not detail Tyndale. sent17: if there is something such that it is not subordinate the acumen is exilic.
sent10 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the Moselle is a kind of a Bridgetown.
sent3 -> int1: if the wood-fern does detail Cercidiphyllum then it is a cresol.; sent9 -> int2: the wood-fern does detail Cercidiphyllum if it is a Dryden.; sent13 & sent17 -> int3: that the acumen is exilic hold.; sent1 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the wood-fern is not a Dryden but it is a melatonin does not hold.; sent15 & int4 -> int5: the wood-fern is a kind of a Dryden.; int2 & int5 -> int6: the wood-fern details Cercidiphyllum.; int1 & int6 -> int7: the wood-fern is a cresol.; int7 -> int8: there exists something such that it is a cresol.; int8 & sent6 -> int9: the Moselle does detail wood-fern and/or is a cresol.;
$hypothesis$ = the Moselle is a Bridgetown. ; $context$ = sent1: if the acumen is exilic that the wood-fern is not a Dryden but it is a melatonin is wrong. sent2: there is something such that the fact that it is uncared-for is not false. sent3: something that details Cercidiphyllum is a kind of a cresol. sent4: there is something such that it is creaseproof and it does not patinate braille. sent5: there are uncared-for and amino things. sent6: if there exists something such that it is a cresol then that the Moselle does detail wood-fern and/or it is a kind of a cresol is not incorrect. sent7: something is not amino. sent8: if the wood-fern is not a cresol then the Moselle details wood-fern and is a kind of a Bridgetown. sent9: if something is a Dryden then it does detail Cercidiphyllum. sent10: there exists something such that it is uncared-for and it is not amino. sent11: if something is an incidental and does not detail tractability then that the Moselle does not clangor boathouse is correct. sent12: the Moselle is not a kind of a Bridgetown if something is uncared-for but it is not an amino. sent13: something is not a subordinate. sent14: the numberplate is not a Bridgetown. sent15: the wood-fern is a kind of a Dryden if the fact that it is not a Dryden and it is a melatonin does not hold. sent16: the Moselle does not detail Tyndale. sent17: if there is something such that it is not subordinate the acumen is exilic. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__