the pistoleer is a thalamus.
sent1: if the fact that the fluorapatite ridicules Brighton and is not a beaten is false then the pistoleer is not a thalamus. sent2: the fact that the phenomenon is hemal is true if it ridicules Brighton. sent3: the pistoleer does ridicule Brighton. sent4: if the fluorapatite is a promise then the fact that it is a kind of a holocephalan and it does not commentate does not hold. sent5: the phenomenon is hemal. sent6: if the fluorapatite confines perversion then that it does ridicule Brighton and is a beaten is wrong. sent7: the fact that something does ridicule Brighton but it is not a kind of a beaten is false if that it does confine perversion is not wrong. sent8: if something that is crinoid is hemal the fluorapatite is a Teredinidae. sent9: the phenomenon is a crinoid. sent10: if something is a Teredinidae then it confines perversion. sent11: that the fluorapatite does ridicule Brighton and it is a beaten is not true.
sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the phenomenon is a kind of a crinoid and it is hemal.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a crinoid and it is hemal.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fluorapatite is a Teredinidae.; sent10 -> int4: if the fluorapatite is a Teredinidae then that it confines perversion is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fluorapatite does confine perversion.; sent7 -> int6: if that the fluorapatite confines perversion is correct the fact that it does ridicule Brighton and it does not beat does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the fluorapatite ridicules Brighton and is not a beaten is not right.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the pistoleer is a thalamus. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the fluorapatite ridicules Brighton and is not a beaten is false then the pistoleer is not a thalamus. sent2: the fact that the phenomenon is hemal is true if it ridicules Brighton. sent3: the pistoleer does ridicule Brighton. sent4: if the fluorapatite is a promise then the fact that it is a kind of a holocephalan and it does not commentate does not hold. sent5: the phenomenon is hemal. sent6: if the fluorapatite confines perversion then that it does ridicule Brighton and is a beaten is wrong. sent7: the fact that something does ridicule Brighton but it is not a kind of a beaten is false if that it does confine perversion is not wrong. sent8: if something that is crinoid is hemal the fluorapatite is a Teredinidae. sent9: the phenomenon is a crinoid. sent10: if something is a Teredinidae then it confines perversion. sent11: that the fluorapatite does ridicule Brighton and it is a beaten is not true. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent5 -> int1: the phenomenon is a kind of a crinoid and it is hemal.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a crinoid and it is hemal.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the fluorapatite is a Teredinidae.; sent10 -> int4: if the fluorapatite is a Teredinidae then that it confines perversion is not wrong.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fluorapatite does confine perversion.; sent7 -> int6: if that the fluorapatite confines perversion is correct the fact that it does ridicule Brighton and it does not beat does not hold.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the fluorapatite ridicules Brighton and is not a beaten is not right.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__