the gingerbread is non-geriatrics thing that is cortical.
sent1: the oilrig is a Porzana and it is aboral if something birdnests firebox. sent2: the gingerbread is non-geriatrics. sent3: if the oilrig is not phrenological then that the gingerbread is not geriatrics but it is cortical is not true. sent4: the firebox birdnests firebox if there exists something such that the fact that it does not birdnests firebox and is not an eland is not correct. sent5: the fact that if that something is non-mnemonic thing that birdnests firebox is not true it does not birdnests firebox is true. sent6: that the turnaround does not strand apishamore and it is not a dole is not true if it is not concise. sent7: if the gingerbread is geriatrics the oilrig is not geriatrics and is cortical. sent8: there exists something such that it is not geriatrics. sent9: there exists something such that it is not phrenological. sent10: if the fact that something is not phrenological is not incorrect that the oilrig is geriatrics is right. sent11: that that the hagberry does not birdnest firebox and it is not an eland is wrong hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a mnemonic. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a dole the nutmeg-yew is an eland and birdnests firebox. sent13: the valine is a dole if there exists something such that the fact that it does not strand apishamore and it is not a dole is incorrect. sent14: if the oilrig is geriatrics then the gingerbread is not geriatrics. sent15: if that the nutmeg-yew is an eland and it birdnests firebox hold then the fact that the apishamore does not birdnests firebox is right. sent16: there exists something such that it is phrenological. sent17: that something is not geriatrics but cortical does not hold if it is not phrenological. sent18: the apishamore is a kind of a mnemonic. sent19: the fact that the hagberry is not mnemonic but it birdnests firebox does not hold if there exists something such that it does not birdnests firebox. sent20: if the hagberry does not birdnest firebox the firebox is aboral but it is not a Porzana. sent21: the fact that the turnaround is not concise hold.
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the oilrig is geriatrics is right.;
that the gingerbread is not geriatrics but it is cortical is not correct.
sent5 -> int2: if that the hagberry is not a mnemonic and birdnests firebox is incorrect then it does not birdnests firebox.; sent6 & sent21 -> int3: the fact that the turnaround does not strand apishamore and is not a dole is not right.; int3 -> int4: there is something such that that it does not strand apishamore and it is not a dole is not right.; int4 & sent13 -> int5: the valine is a dole.; int5 -> int6: there is something such that that it is a dole hold.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the nutmeg-yew is a kind of an eland and it does birdnest firebox.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: the apishamore does not birdnest firebox.; int8 -> int9: something does not birdnest firebox.; int9 & sent19 -> int10: that the hagberry is not mnemonic but it does birdnest firebox is not true.; int2 & int10 -> int11: the hagberry does not birdnest firebox.; sent20 & int11 -> int12: the firebox is aboral but it is not a kind of a Porzana.; int12 -> int13: something is aboral but not a Porzana.;
$hypothesis$ = the gingerbread is non-geriatrics thing that is cortical. ; $context$ = sent1: the oilrig is a Porzana and it is aboral if something birdnests firebox. sent2: the gingerbread is non-geriatrics. sent3: if the oilrig is not phrenological then that the gingerbread is not geriatrics but it is cortical is not true. sent4: the firebox birdnests firebox if there exists something such that the fact that it does not birdnests firebox and is not an eland is not correct. sent5: the fact that if that something is non-mnemonic thing that birdnests firebox is not true it does not birdnests firebox is true. sent6: that the turnaround does not strand apishamore and it is not a dole is not true if it is not concise. sent7: if the gingerbread is geriatrics the oilrig is not geriatrics and is cortical. sent8: there exists something such that it is not geriatrics. sent9: there exists something such that it is not phrenological. sent10: if the fact that something is not phrenological is not incorrect that the oilrig is geriatrics is right. sent11: that that the hagberry does not birdnest firebox and it is not an eland is wrong hold if there exists something such that it is a kind of a mnemonic. sent12: if there exists something such that it is a dole the nutmeg-yew is an eland and birdnests firebox. sent13: the valine is a dole if there exists something such that the fact that it does not strand apishamore and it is not a dole is incorrect. sent14: if the oilrig is geriatrics then the gingerbread is not geriatrics. sent15: if that the nutmeg-yew is an eland and it birdnests firebox hold then the fact that the apishamore does not birdnests firebox is right. sent16: there exists something such that it is phrenological. sent17: that something is not geriatrics but cortical does not hold if it is not phrenological. sent18: the apishamore is a kind of a mnemonic. sent19: the fact that the hagberry is not mnemonic but it birdnests firebox does not hold if there exists something such that it does not birdnests firebox. sent20: if the hagberry does not birdnest firebox the firebox is aboral but it is not a Porzana. sent21: the fact that the turnaround is not concise hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent10 -> int1: the fact that the oilrig is geriatrics is right.; __UNKNOWN__