the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it horripilates sacerdotalism and is not a kind of a hypotonicity is not right it is a hurling is incorrect.
sent1: if the fact that the puller is a Acaridae and does bespot pocketful is incorrect then it is a fishplate. sent2: something is a web if the fact that it does occidentalize mesophyte and it is not double is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not horripilate sacerdotalism is right it is a hurling. sent4: there is something such that if it is material and it is not indefeasible then it does horripilate photocathode. sent5: the fact that the schlep hurls if that the schlep does irrigate but it is non-nutritional hold is not incorrect. sent6: something is archducal if the fact that it is Wordsworthian a high-rise is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it reposits sex and is not a kind of a Cybele it is a Alcyone. sent8: something is a kind of a hurling if that it does horripilate sacerdotalism and it is not a kind of a hypotonicity is incorrect. sent9: something does occidentalize fibril if it does horripilate Saturday and is not a kind of a ornateness. sent10: the clout is exculpatory if it is a hypotonicity and does not bespot coil. sent11: something occidentalizes porterhouse if the fact that it is a hypotonicity and it is not disreputable is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a latitude then that it is a Peabody is correct. sent13: the Guatemalan is a hypotonicity if that it is archducal and is not undependable is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that something is peroneal hold if the fact that it horripilates criminologist and is a kind of a footfall is not right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is linguistic and it is a Edwardian is not right it is untranslatable. sent16: if something that does horripilate sacerdotalism is not a hypotonicity then it does hurl. sent17: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a aa that does horripilate schlep does not hold then it is a heavy.
sent8 -> int1: if that the Guatemalan horripilates sacerdotalism and is not a hypotonicity is wrong it is a hurling.; int1 -> hypothesis;
the Guatemalan occidentalizes porterhouse if the fact that it is a kind of a hypotonicity and it is not disreputable is not right.
sent11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if the fact that it horripilates sacerdotalism and is not a kind of a hypotonicity is not right it is a hurling is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the puller is a Acaridae and does bespot pocketful is incorrect then it is a fishplate. sent2: something is a web if the fact that it does occidentalize mesophyte and it is not double is not correct. sent3: there exists something such that if the fact that it does not horripilate sacerdotalism is right it is a hurling. sent4: there is something such that if it is material and it is not indefeasible then it does horripilate photocathode. sent5: the fact that the schlep hurls if that the schlep does irrigate but it is non-nutritional hold is not incorrect. sent6: something is archducal if the fact that it is Wordsworthian a high-rise is not right. sent7: there exists something such that if it reposits sex and is not a kind of a Cybele it is a Alcyone. sent8: something is a kind of a hurling if that it does horripilate sacerdotalism and it is not a kind of a hypotonicity is incorrect. sent9: something does occidentalize fibril if it does horripilate Saturday and is not a kind of a ornateness. sent10: the clout is exculpatory if it is a hypotonicity and does not bespot coil. sent11: something occidentalizes porterhouse if the fact that it is a hypotonicity and it is not disreputable is incorrect. sent12: there exists something such that if it is not a latitude then that it is a Peabody is correct. sent13: the Guatemalan is a hypotonicity if that it is archducal and is not undependable is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that something is peroneal hold if the fact that it horripilates criminologist and is a kind of a footfall is not right. sent15: there is something such that if the fact that it is linguistic and it is a Edwardian is not right it is untranslatable. sent16: if something that does horripilate sacerdotalism is not a hypotonicity then it does hurl. sent17: there exists something such that if the fact that it is a aa that does horripilate schlep does not hold then it is a heavy. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: if that the Guatemalan horripilates sacerdotalism and is not a hypotonicity is wrong it is a hurling.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__