the Hindu jazzes Ledum and it feuds.
sent1: something does feud if it is a kind of a leftism. sent2: the comfrey does jazz Ledum. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not a cooperative and it does not calcify does not hold. sent4: the Hindu does not calcify and it is not ametropic if it is a kind of a cooperative. sent5: that the Hindu does jazz Ledum and is a feud does not hold if it is not a bioscope. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the pith is not a soldier and not a bioscope is not right hold then the fact that it is splintery is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the spinster is a bioscope if the pith is splintery hold. sent8: if something is a piety then the gunnel is not ametropic. sent9: the gunnel does jazz Ledum and is not a bioscope. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a feud and does not mystify schemer does not hold. sent11: the comfrey is not splintery. sent12: the checkerbloom does jazz Ledum. sent13: if the comfrey is not a piety the Hindu is a leftism or it is not a kind of a soldier or both. sent14: if the Hindu is not splintery but it is insular then it is not a kind of a bioscope. sent15: the Hindu is a cerebrum and it is not non-anaphasic. sent16: that the pith is splintery is true if the fact that the checkerbloom mystifies schemer but it is not a generalship is false. sent17: that something does jazz Ledum and it is a feud is not right if the fact that it is not a bioscope hold. sent18: the pith does mystify schemer. sent19: if the Hindu is not a soldier then it feuds. sent20: that the checkerbloom does not soldier is right. sent21: the Hindu jazzes Ledum if the checkerbloom mystifies schemer. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-cooperative thing that does not calcify is not right then the gunnel is non-ametropic. sent23: the Hindu does jazz Ledum if it is insular. sent24: if the fact that that something is not a kind of a bioscope and it is not insular is not wrong does not hold then it is ametropic. sent25: something is not splintery if either it is not insular or it does jazz Ledum or both. sent26: that the checkerbloom is a generalship but it is not a soldier is not true if the fact that the Hindu is a generalship is not wrong. sent27: the comfrey is not a kind of a piety. sent28: the gunnel is a cerebrum.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the checkerbloom mystifies schemer and is not a kind of a generalship does not hold.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the pith is splintery.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the spinster is a bioscope.; sent24 -> int3: the gunnel is ametropic if that it is not a bioscope and is not insular is false.; sent3 & sent22 -> int4: the gunnel is not ametropic.; sent13 & sent27 -> int5: the Hindu is a kind of a leftism or it is not a soldier or both.; sent1 -> int6: if the fact that the Hindu is not a leftism is not right then it is a kind of a feud.; int5 & int6 & sent19 -> int7: the Hindu feuds.;
that the Hindu jazzes Ledum and is a feud does not hold.
sent17 -> int8: if the Hindu is not a bioscope the fact that it jazzes Ledum and it is a feud is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Hindu jazzes Ledum and it feuds. ; $context$ = sent1: something does feud if it is a kind of a leftism. sent2: the comfrey does jazz Ledum. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not a cooperative and it does not calcify does not hold. sent4: the Hindu does not calcify and it is not ametropic if it is a kind of a cooperative. sent5: that the Hindu does jazz Ledum and is a feud does not hold if it is not a bioscope. sent6: if the fact that the fact that the pith is not a soldier and not a bioscope is not right hold then the fact that it is splintery is not wrong. sent7: the fact that the spinster is a bioscope if the pith is splintery hold. sent8: if something is a piety then the gunnel is not ametropic. sent9: the gunnel does jazz Ledum and is not a bioscope. sent10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a feud and does not mystify schemer does not hold. sent11: the comfrey is not splintery. sent12: the checkerbloom does jazz Ledum. sent13: if the comfrey is not a piety the Hindu is a leftism or it is not a kind of a soldier or both. sent14: if the Hindu is not splintery but it is insular then it is not a kind of a bioscope. sent15: the Hindu is a cerebrum and it is not non-anaphasic. sent16: that the pith is splintery is true if the fact that the checkerbloom mystifies schemer but it is not a generalship is false. sent17: that something does jazz Ledum and it is a feud is not right if the fact that it is not a bioscope hold. sent18: the pith does mystify schemer. sent19: if the Hindu is not a soldier then it feuds. sent20: that the checkerbloom does not soldier is right. sent21: the Hindu jazzes Ledum if the checkerbloom mystifies schemer. sent22: if there is something such that the fact that it is non-cooperative thing that does not calcify is not right then the gunnel is non-ametropic. sent23: the Hindu does jazz Ledum if it is insular. sent24: if the fact that that something is not a kind of a bioscope and it is not insular is not wrong does not hold then it is ametropic. sent25: something is not splintery if either it is not insular or it does jazz Ledum or both. sent26: that the checkerbloom is a generalship but it is not a soldier is not true if the fact that the Hindu is a generalship is not wrong. sent27: the comfrey is not a kind of a piety. sent28: the gunnel is a cerebrum. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the checkerbloom mystifies schemer and is not a kind of a generalship does not hold.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the pith is splintery.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the spinster is a bioscope.; sent24 -> int3: the gunnel is ametropic if that it is not a bioscope and is not insular is false.; sent3 & sent22 -> int4: the gunnel is not ametropic.; sent13 & sent27 -> int5: the Hindu is a kind of a leftism or it is not a soldier or both.; sent1 -> int6: if the fact that the Hindu is not a leftism is not right then it is a kind of a feud.; int5 & int6 & sent19 -> int7: the Hindu feuds.; __UNKNOWN__