the primary is a swag.
sent1: if that something does not rice permutability is not wrong then that it does charm Algren and it is not a kind of a Guinean is incorrect. sent2: the mizzen is not a disjointedness but it swags. sent3: if that something does clutter is true it is a swag. sent4: the fact that the veneering is kinetic or it does charm baccalaureate or both is not right if it is not morphophonemic. sent5: the pliers does not rice permutability and is a kind of a timeline. sent6: the dandruff is Guinean. sent7: if something is a cluttered it is a timeline. sent8: the fact that if something rices permutability it does not charm Algren and/or it is not a kind of a cluttered is not incorrect. sent9: the primary is not a kind of a Guinean. sent10: the primary does not rice permutability. sent11: the primary does clutter if that the pliers charms Algren but it is non-Guinean is incorrect. sent12: the pliers is tracheal. sent13: something does not swag if it rices permutability. sent14: the pliers is a kind of a timeline. sent15: the parlormaid is non-Iraqi if that the veneering is kinetic and/or it does charm baccalaureate is not right.
sent1 -> int1: if the pliers does not rice permutability that it does charm Algren and it is not Guinean is wrong.; sent5 -> int2: the pliers does not rice permutability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the pliers does charm Algren and is not a Guinean is not true.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the primary is a cluttered.; sent3 -> int5: the primary is a swag if it does clutter.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the Berlin does not charm Algren.
sent8 -> int6: if the primary does rice permutability then it does not charm Algren or is not a cluttered or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the primary is a swag. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something does not rice permutability is not wrong then that it does charm Algren and it is not a kind of a Guinean is incorrect. sent2: the mizzen is not a disjointedness but it swags. sent3: if that something does clutter is true it is a swag. sent4: the fact that the veneering is kinetic or it does charm baccalaureate or both is not right if it is not morphophonemic. sent5: the pliers does not rice permutability and is a kind of a timeline. sent6: the dandruff is Guinean. sent7: if something is a cluttered it is a timeline. sent8: the fact that if something rices permutability it does not charm Algren and/or it is not a kind of a cluttered is not incorrect. sent9: the primary is not a kind of a Guinean. sent10: the primary does not rice permutability. sent11: the primary does clutter if that the pliers charms Algren but it is non-Guinean is incorrect. sent12: the pliers is tracheal. sent13: something does not swag if it rices permutability. sent14: the pliers is a kind of a timeline. sent15: the parlormaid is non-Iraqi if that the veneering is kinetic and/or it does charm baccalaureate is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 -> int1: if the pliers does not rice permutability that it does charm Algren and it is not Guinean is wrong.; sent5 -> int2: the pliers does not rice permutability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the pliers does charm Algren and is not a Guinean is not true.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the primary is a cluttered.; sent3 -> int5: the primary is a swag if it does clutter.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__