there exists something such that if it is untranslatable it does not varnish bean.
sent1: that the radiotelegraph is not a muskiness if the fact that the divider is both not a muskiness and Latvian is false hold. sent2: the fact that that the radiotelegraph is not a muskiness and it does not flick Bartlett is not right is not incorrect if the divider does not flick Bartlett. sent3: the Latino is untranslatable if there exists something such that the fact that it is Arthurian and it is not untranslatable does not hold. sent4: the gingerol is a bourn if there is something such that it does not flick Corvus. sent5: the fact that the repatriate varnishes bean and is not untranslatable is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not untranslatable. sent6: the divider is a Latvian if the fact that it is not untranslatable and does not flick Bartlett is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the divider is not a muskiness but it is a kind of a Latvian does not hold if the repatriate does flick Bartlett. sent8: if the fact that the reciprocal is both not palpebrate and not tactless hold then it does not flick Corvus. sent9: the fact that the divider either is not a determiner or does not whelp or both is incorrect. sent10: if something is not colloidal then the fact that it is a kind of Arthurian thing that is not untranslatable is wrong. sent11: the tendergreen is not colloidal if the gingerol is a bourn. sent12: the divider does not flick Bartlett if the fact that either it is not a determiner or it does not whelp or both does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it does flick telescoped it is a Marduk. sent14: the reciprocal does not palpebrate and it is not tactless. sent15: the radiotelegraph does not varnish bean if it is a Latvian and it is untranslatable. sent16: if something is not a muskiness the fact that it does not varnish zap and/or it is not a kind of a Tiamat is false.
sent12 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the divider does not flick Bartlett is not false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the radiotelegraph is not a muskiness and does not flick Bartlett is not right is not false.;
the fact that that either the radiotelegraph does not varnish zap or it is not a Tiamat or both is not correct is not wrong.
sent16 -> int3: if the radiotelegraph is not a kind of a muskiness that it does not varnish zap and/or it is not a kind of a Tiamat is wrong.; sent10 -> int4: that the tendergreen is Arthurian but not untranslatable is not correct if it is not colloidal.; sent8 & sent14 -> int5: the fact that the reciprocal does not flick Corvus is not wrong.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it does not flick Corvus.; int6 & sent4 -> int7: the gingerol is a kind of a bourn.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: the tendergreen is not colloidal.; int4 & int8 -> int9: that the tendergreen is both Arthurian and not untranslatable does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that it is Arthurian and it is not untranslatable is not true.; int10 & sent3 -> int11: the Latino is untranslatable.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is untranslatable.; int12 & sent5 -> int13: that the repatriate does varnish bean but it is not untranslatable is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it is untranslatable it does not varnish bean. ; $context$ = sent1: that the radiotelegraph is not a muskiness if the fact that the divider is both not a muskiness and Latvian is false hold. sent2: the fact that that the radiotelegraph is not a muskiness and it does not flick Bartlett is not right is not incorrect if the divider does not flick Bartlett. sent3: the Latino is untranslatable if there exists something such that the fact that it is Arthurian and it is not untranslatable does not hold. sent4: the gingerol is a bourn if there is something such that it does not flick Corvus. sent5: the fact that the repatriate varnishes bean and is not untranslatable is incorrect if there exists something such that it is not untranslatable. sent6: the divider is a Latvian if the fact that it is not untranslatable and does not flick Bartlett is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the divider is not a muskiness but it is a kind of a Latvian does not hold if the repatriate does flick Bartlett. sent8: if the fact that the reciprocal is both not palpebrate and not tactless hold then it does not flick Corvus. sent9: the fact that the divider either is not a determiner or does not whelp or both is incorrect. sent10: if something is not colloidal then the fact that it is a kind of Arthurian thing that is not untranslatable is wrong. sent11: the tendergreen is not colloidal if the gingerol is a bourn. sent12: the divider does not flick Bartlett if the fact that either it is not a determiner or it does not whelp or both does not hold. sent13: there exists something such that if it does flick telescoped it is a Marduk. sent14: the reciprocal does not palpebrate and it is not tactless. sent15: the radiotelegraph does not varnish bean if it is a Latvian and it is untranslatable. sent16: if something is not a muskiness the fact that it does not varnish zap and/or it is not a kind of a Tiamat is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent9 -> int1: the fact that the divider does not flick Bartlett is not false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the fact that the radiotelegraph is not a muskiness and does not flick Bartlett is not right is not false.; __UNKNOWN__