the fact that the generosity occurs but the method does not occur if the whistling Serratula occurs is not right.
sent1: if the generosity happens and the method does not occur then the whistling Serratula does not occur. sent2: the generosity is brought about by that the whistling Serratula occurs. sent3: the whistling Serratula does not occur if the fact that the generosity happens and the method occurs does not hold. sent4: the generosity and the method occurs. sent5: the whistling Serratula or the compoundedness or both is caused by that the dreaming gallop does not occur. sent6: the settlement occurs. sent7: if that the generosity occurs and the method does not occur is wrong then the whistling Serratula does not occur. sent8: that the gastrointestinalness but not the acculturation happens does not hold. sent9: the whistling defecator does not occur. sent10: the generosity happens. sent11: the swing happens but the importantness does not occur. sent12: that the generosity does not occur causes that the whistling Serratula does not occur. sent13: the chorus occurs. sent14: the fact that the recessional happens and the expunction does not occur is wrong. sent15: the generosity happens and the method happens if the whistling Serratula happens. sent16: the smiting sapidity does not occur if that the gastrointestinalness and the non-expansionistness happens is false. sent17: the method happens. sent18: the counselorship does not occur. sent19: that the outgrowth occurs hold if that the whistling Serratula but not the compounded occurs is not correct. sent20: if the fact that the dreaming cryptography happens and the unitization does not occur is incorrect the marketing does not occur. sent21: the fact that the collapsing but not the maternalism occurs is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the generosity but not the method occurs is incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the whistling Serratula does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whistling Serratula occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the generosity but not the method occurs.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the outgrowth occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the generosity occurs but the method does not occur if the whistling Serratula occurs is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the generosity happens and the method does not occur then the whistling Serratula does not occur. sent2: the generosity is brought about by that the whistling Serratula occurs. sent3: the whistling Serratula does not occur if the fact that the generosity happens and the method occurs does not hold. sent4: the generosity and the method occurs. sent5: the whistling Serratula or the compoundedness or both is caused by that the dreaming gallop does not occur. sent6: the settlement occurs. sent7: if that the generosity occurs and the method does not occur is wrong then the whistling Serratula does not occur. sent8: that the gastrointestinalness but not the acculturation happens does not hold. sent9: the whistling defecator does not occur. sent10: the generosity happens. sent11: the swing happens but the importantness does not occur. sent12: that the generosity does not occur causes that the whistling Serratula does not occur. sent13: the chorus occurs. sent14: the fact that the recessional happens and the expunction does not occur is wrong. sent15: the generosity happens and the method happens if the whistling Serratula happens. sent16: the smiting sapidity does not occur if that the gastrointestinalness and the non-expansionistness happens is false. sent17: the method happens. sent18: the counselorship does not occur. sent19: that the outgrowth occurs hold if that the whistling Serratula but not the compounded occurs is not correct. sent20: if the fact that the dreaming cryptography happens and the unitization does not occur is incorrect the marketing does not occur. sent21: the fact that the collapsing but not the maternalism occurs is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the generosity but not the method occurs is incorrect.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the whistling Serratula does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the whistling Serratula occurs.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the generosity but not the method occurs.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__