the epaulet is not indecisive.
sent1: if something is a kind of a backyard then it is indecisive. sent2: the epaulet is receptive but it is not a dermatoglyphic if there exists something such that it is not indecisive. sent3: the banquette is a dermatoglyphic if that the furrow is both not a dermatoglyphic and not receptive is not true. sent4: something is not a backyard. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does not sign ritz and/or it is not eugenic hold is not true the basophil is granuliferous. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a foul and it is not a kind of a patrilineage is not correct. sent7: the ritz is not a kind of a Aerobacter if there exists something such that the fact that it is both foul and not a patrilineage does not hold. sent8: the assignee is not a dermatoglyphic. sent9: if something is granuliferous then the fact that the furrow is not a dermatoglyphic and is not receptive is wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a backyard then the banquette is a kind of a dermatoglyphic that is not receptive. sent11: the fact that the fact that either the ritz does not sign ritz or it is not eugenic or both is not wrong is incorrect if it is not a Aerobacter.
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the banquette is a kind of a dermatoglyphic but it is not receptive.;
the epaulet is indecisive.
sent1 -> int2: the epaulet is indecisive if it is a backyard.; sent6 & sent7 -> int3: the ritz is not a Aerobacter.; sent11 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the ritz does not sign ritz or it is not eugenic or both is incorrect.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it does not sign ritz and/or is non-eugenic is not correct.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the basophil is granuliferous.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it is granuliferous.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the fact that the furrow is not a dermatoglyphic and is not receptive is not right.; sent3 & int8 -> int9: the banquette is a dermatoglyphic.; int9 -> int10: the fact that the banquette is a dermatoglyphic and/or a backyard hold.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that it is either a dermatoglyphic or a backyard or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the epaulet is not indecisive. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is a kind of a backyard then it is indecisive. sent2: the epaulet is receptive but it is not a dermatoglyphic if there exists something such that it is not indecisive. sent3: the banquette is a dermatoglyphic if that the furrow is both not a dermatoglyphic and not receptive is not true. sent4: something is not a backyard. sent5: if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does not sign ritz and/or it is not eugenic hold is not true the basophil is granuliferous. sent6: there exists something such that that it is a foul and it is not a kind of a patrilineage is not correct. sent7: the ritz is not a kind of a Aerobacter if there exists something such that the fact that it is both foul and not a patrilineage does not hold. sent8: the assignee is not a dermatoglyphic. sent9: if something is granuliferous then the fact that the furrow is not a dermatoglyphic and is not receptive is wrong. sent10: if there is something such that it is not a backyard then the banquette is a kind of a dermatoglyphic that is not receptive. sent11: the fact that the fact that either the ritz does not sign ritz or it is not eugenic or both is not wrong is incorrect if it is not a Aerobacter. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent10 -> int1: the banquette is a kind of a dermatoglyphic but it is not receptive.; __UNKNOWN__