that the ozone is not a kind of a evolutionism and/or it is not intimal is not right.
sent1: if the eunuch is not non-funicular but careful it is not a kind of a Jewess. sent2: the ozone is intimal. sent3: the Saskatoon is not a Jewess. sent4: there exists something such that it does not suborn Tamm. sent5: if something is not careful then it is intimal. sent6: the eunuch is careful if the brant is careful. sent7: if the eunuch is a evolutionism then the ozone is intimal. sent8: the fact that the ozone is not careful is not wrong if that it is a funicular and it is a kind of a evolutionism is true. sent9: there is something such that that it suborns Cockcroft is right. sent10: if something is not a funicular and/or it is not careful then it does not smoothen. sent11: the remise is not a kind of a funicular and/or is not careful if the eunuch is not a evolutionism. sent12: the ozone is not a kind of a blemish if the fact that it does not suborn Anhingidae and is a blemish is wrong. sent13: something smoothens. sent14: something bans straphanger. sent15: if there exists something such that it does ban straphanger and it does smoothen then the eunuch is a funicular. sent16: if something is intimal and it is a evolutionism the eunuch is careful. sent17: the brant is careful. sent18: something is a evolutionism if it is not a Jewess. sent19: the custodian is intimal if it is not a doorkeeper. sent20: if the eunuch is a evolutionism then the fact that the ozone is not a evolutionism or it is not intimal or both is incorrect. sent21: there is something such that it does ban straphanger and it does smoothen. sent22: the eunuch is not a evolutionism if the ozone is not a kind of a blemish and is a evolutionism. sent23: that either the Siamese is careful or it does not smoothen or both is not true if the restoration is a kind of a funicular. sent24: if something does not smoothen it is a Jewess that bans straphanger. sent25: the brant does not smoothen if the fact that either the Siamese is careful or it does not smoothen or both is not true. sent26: if the ozone does fetter Bitis then the fact that it does not suborn Anhingidae and it does blemish is not true. sent27: the eunuch is not a evolutionism if that the brant bans straphanger and/or it is not a evolutionism is incorrect.
sent21 & sent15 -> int1: the eunuch is a funicular.; sent6 & sent17 -> int2: the eunuch is careful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eunuch is a funicular and it is careful.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the eunuch is not a Jewess.; sent18 -> int5: if the eunuch is not a kind of a Jewess then the fact that it is a kind of a evolutionism is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the eunuch is a kind of a evolutionism.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
either the ozone is not a kind of a evolutionism or it is not intimal or both.
$hypothesis$ = that the ozone is not a kind of a evolutionism and/or it is not intimal is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the eunuch is not non-funicular but careful it is not a kind of a Jewess. sent2: the ozone is intimal. sent3: the Saskatoon is not a Jewess. sent4: there exists something such that it does not suborn Tamm. sent5: if something is not careful then it is intimal. sent6: the eunuch is careful if the brant is careful. sent7: if the eunuch is a evolutionism then the ozone is intimal. sent8: the fact that the ozone is not careful is not wrong if that it is a funicular and it is a kind of a evolutionism is true. sent9: there is something such that that it suborns Cockcroft is right. sent10: if something is not a funicular and/or it is not careful then it does not smoothen. sent11: the remise is not a kind of a funicular and/or is not careful if the eunuch is not a evolutionism. sent12: the ozone is not a kind of a blemish if the fact that it does not suborn Anhingidae and is a blemish is wrong. sent13: something smoothens. sent14: something bans straphanger. sent15: if there exists something such that it does ban straphanger and it does smoothen then the eunuch is a funicular. sent16: if something is intimal and it is a evolutionism the eunuch is careful. sent17: the brant is careful. sent18: something is a evolutionism if it is not a Jewess. sent19: the custodian is intimal if it is not a doorkeeper. sent20: if the eunuch is a evolutionism then the fact that the ozone is not a evolutionism or it is not intimal or both is incorrect. sent21: there is something such that it does ban straphanger and it does smoothen. sent22: the eunuch is not a evolutionism if the ozone is not a kind of a blemish and is a evolutionism. sent23: that either the Siamese is careful or it does not smoothen or both is not true if the restoration is a kind of a funicular. sent24: if something does not smoothen it is a Jewess that bans straphanger. sent25: the brant does not smoothen if the fact that either the Siamese is careful or it does not smoothen or both is not true. sent26: if the ozone does fetter Bitis then the fact that it does not suborn Anhingidae and it does blemish is not true. sent27: the eunuch is not a evolutionism if that the brant bans straphanger and/or it is not a evolutionism is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent15 -> int1: the eunuch is a funicular.; sent6 & sent17 -> int2: the eunuch is careful.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the eunuch is a funicular and it is careful.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the eunuch is not a Jewess.; sent18 -> int5: if the eunuch is not a kind of a Jewess then the fact that it is a kind of a evolutionism is right.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the eunuch is a kind of a evolutionism.; int6 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__