the trumpetwood is inexpressible.
sent1: if the cambric does fox the fact that it is a kind of a prevention and it is a heaume is not true. sent2: the cambric is a kind of a fox. sent3: the fact that something is inexpressible and not a heaume is false if it foxes. sent4: if that the cambric is inexpressible is correct then that that it is a kind of a heaume that is not a fox is right is not true. sent5: if either something is not nomothetic or it does not purify petchary or both then it is not nomothetic. sent6: that the trumpetwood is inexpressible but it is not a heaume is false. sent7: the fact that something is a prevention but it is not a heaume is false if it foxes. sent8: the cambric is not a drawl. sent9: if the cambric is a heaume then the trumpetwood is not inexpressible. sent10: if the fact that the cambric is a prevention but it is not a kind of a heaume is not right the trumpetwood is not inexpressible. sent11: something that is not nomothetic is inexpressible a fox. sent12: if something is a fox the fact that it is a prevention and it is a heaume is false. sent13: the trumpetwood is a heaume.
sent7 -> int1: if the cambric does fox that it is a kind of a prevention that is not a heaume is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the fact that the cambric is a prevention but it is not a kind of a heaume hold does not hold.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the trumpetwood is inexpressible.
sent11 -> int3: if the trumpetwood is not nomothetic it is inexpressible and it is a fox.; sent5 -> int4: the trumpetwood is not nomothetic if it either is not nomothetic or does not purify petchary or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the trumpetwood is inexpressible. ; $context$ = sent1: if the cambric does fox the fact that it is a kind of a prevention and it is a heaume is not true. sent2: the cambric is a kind of a fox. sent3: the fact that something is inexpressible and not a heaume is false if it foxes. sent4: if that the cambric is inexpressible is correct then that that it is a kind of a heaume that is not a fox is right is not true. sent5: if either something is not nomothetic or it does not purify petchary or both then it is not nomothetic. sent6: that the trumpetwood is inexpressible but it is not a heaume is false. sent7: the fact that something is a prevention but it is not a heaume is false if it foxes. sent8: the cambric is not a drawl. sent9: if the cambric is a heaume then the trumpetwood is not inexpressible. sent10: if the fact that the cambric is a prevention but it is not a kind of a heaume is not right the trumpetwood is not inexpressible. sent11: something that is not nomothetic is inexpressible a fox. sent12: if something is a fox the fact that it is a prevention and it is a heaume is false. sent13: the trumpetwood is a heaume. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the cambric does fox that it is a kind of a prevention that is not a heaume is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: that the fact that the cambric is a prevention but it is not a kind of a heaume hold does not hold.; int2 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__