that the ceruse is not grammatical is correct.
sent1: the prism does not abscise. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is a spinnability and a Farragut does not hold the Cypriot is not a spinnability. sent3: the fact that the prism is not a newmarket and it is not a Caprimulgidae does not hold if the Cypriot is not a sender. sent4: if the splinter is a spinnability the bathyscaphe is not a spinnability or no-go or both. sent5: if the bathyscaphe is not a kind of a spinnability the briar is a Farragut. sent6: the fact that that the prism is a spinnability and it is a kind of a Farragut is false if there is something such that it is not no-go hold. sent7: something is not ungrammatical if it is both not a sender and not chitinous. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a sender and/or is chitinous then the splinter is a kind of a spinnability. sent9: the ceruse is ungrammatical if the briar is a Farragut. sent10: the prism is a Caprimulgidae and/or it is a kind of a sender if the Cypriot is a kind of a Caprimulgidae. sent11: the Cypriot is not a kind of a spinnability and/or it is a sender. sent12: if the alfalfa is not a velum the fact that the briar is a kind of a penitent that does incandesce is not correct. sent13: if that the splinter is a spinnability is true the bathyscaphe is a spinnability and/or is no-go. sent14: if the briar is not a graded the fact that the bathyscaphe does not abscise but it is no-go does not hold. sent15: that the splinter is acentric and does not abscise is not correct. sent16: if that something is a penitent and it incandesces is wrong then it does not grade. sent17: if the prism does not abscise then it is not a kind of a newmarket and it is not a Caprimulgidae. sent18: the bathyscaphe is a kind of a spinnability and/or it is no-go. sent19: if there is something such that it is chitinous then that the splinter is a spinnability is not wrong. sent20: the alfalfa is not a kind of a velum if there exists something such that it is a Mbundu. sent21: the fact that the prism is not a newmarket but it is a Caprimulgidae is not right. sent22: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it does not abscise and is no-go does not hold then the splinter is not no-go is not incorrect. sent23: the prism is not a kind of a Caprimulgidae. sent24: the yanquapin is a Mbundu.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cypriot is not a kind of a sender.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the prism is not a newmarket and is not a Caprimulgidae is false.; sent17 & sent1 -> int2: the prism is not a newmarket and it is not a kind of a Caprimulgidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Cypriot is a kind of a sender.; int4 -> int5: either the Cypriot is a kind of a sender or it is chitinous or both.; int5 -> int6: something is a sender or is chitinous or both.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the splinter is a spinnability.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the bathyscaphe is not a kind of a spinnability and/or it is no-go.;
the ceruse is not ungrammatical.
sent7 -> int9: if the ceruse is both not a sender and not chitinous it is not ungrammatical.; sent16 -> int10: the briar does not grade if the fact that it is penitent and it incandesces is not correct.; sent24 -> int11: there exists something such that the fact that it is a Mbundu is not false.; int11 & sent20 -> int12: the alfalfa is not a velum.; sent12 & int12 -> int13: that the briar is a kind of a penitent and it does incandesce is not correct.; int10 & int13 -> int14: the briar is not a graded.; sent14 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the bathyscaphe does not abscise but it is no-go does not hold.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that that it does not abscise and it is no-go does not hold.; int16 & sent22 -> int17: the splinter is not no-go.; int17 -> int18: something is not no-go.; int18 & sent6 -> int19: that the prism is a spinnability and a Farragut does not hold.; int19 -> int20: there exists something such that the fact that it is both a spinnability and a Farragut is wrong.; int20 & sent2 -> int21: the Cypriot is not a kind of a spinnability.; int21 -> int22: there exists something such that it is not a spinnability.;
$hypothesis$ = that the ceruse is not grammatical is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the prism does not abscise. sent2: if there is something such that the fact that it is a spinnability and a Farragut does not hold the Cypriot is not a spinnability. sent3: the fact that the prism is not a newmarket and it is not a Caprimulgidae does not hold if the Cypriot is not a sender. sent4: if the splinter is a spinnability the bathyscaphe is not a spinnability or no-go or both. sent5: if the bathyscaphe is not a kind of a spinnability the briar is a Farragut. sent6: the fact that that the prism is a spinnability and it is a kind of a Farragut is false if there is something such that it is not no-go hold. sent7: something is not ungrammatical if it is both not a sender and not chitinous. sent8: if there exists something such that it is a sender and/or is chitinous then the splinter is a kind of a spinnability. sent9: the ceruse is ungrammatical if the briar is a Farragut. sent10: the prism is a Caprimulgidae and/or it is a kind of a sender if the Cypriot is a kind of a Caprimulgidae. sent11: the Cypriot is not a kind of a spinnability and/or it is a sender. sent12: if the alfalfa is not a velum the fact that the briar is a kind of a penitent that does incandesce is not correct. sent13: if that the splinter is a spinnability is true the bathyscaphe is a spinnability and/or is no-go. sent14: if the briar is not a graded the fact that the bathyscaphe does not abscise but it is no-go does not hold. sent15: that the splinter is acentric and does not abscise is not correct. sent16: if that something is a penitent and it incandesces is wrong then it does not grade. sent17: if the prism does not abscise then it is not a kind of a newmarket and it is not a Caprimulgidae. sent18: the bathyscaphe is a kind of a spinnability and/or it is no-go. sent19: if there is something such that it is chitinous then that the splinter is a spinnability is not wrong. sent20: the alfalfa is not a kind of a velum if there exists something such that it is a Mbundu. sent21: the fact that the prism is not a newmarket but it is a Caprimulgidae is not right. sent22: the fact that if there exists something such that the fact that it does not abscise and is no-go does not hold then the splinter is not no-go is not incorrect. sent23: the prism is not a kind of a Caprimulgidae. sent24: the yanquapin is a Mbundu. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Cypriot is not a kind of a sender.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the prism is not a newmarket and is not a Caprimulgidae is false.; sent17 & sent1 -> int2: the prism is not a newmarket and it is not a kind of a Caprimulgidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Cypriot is a kind of a sender.; int4 -> int5: either the Cypriot is a kind of a sender or it is chitinous or both.; int5 -> int6: something is a sender or is chitinous or both.; int6 & sent8 -> int7: the splinter is a spinnability.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the bathyscaphe is not a kind of a spinnability and/or it is no-go.; __UNKNOWN__