the scriptorium is not bulbar.
sent1: the fact that the scriptorium is a dystrophy is right. sent2: if that something is seedless and is not a Chimaeridae is wrong it is not seedless. sent3: the longicorn does not coo pyrolatry. sent4: if something does not coo pyrolatry the fact that the pyelogram is seedless and is not a Chimaeridae does not hold. sent5: if the steamer does coo Smolensk and it is not non-phenomenal then the scriptorium is not bulbar. sent6: if that the steamer is not phenomenal is not incorrect it is a kind of a dystrophy. sent7: if an institutional thing is not a kind of a bargainer then it is not a kind of a dystrophy. sent8: there exists something such that it is not noninstitutional. sent9: that the scriptorium is a bargainer is true if there exists something such that it is both not noninstitutional and a dystrophy. sent10: The Smolensk does coo pyelogram. sent11: there is something such that it is noninstitutional and it is a dystrophy. sent12: the steamer is not noninstitutional but it is a dystrophy if it is not phenomenal. sent13: the biophysicist is not noninstitutional but it is an altarpiece if it is not a pin-up. sent14: the pyelogram does not coo Smolensk if the fact that the steamer is not a retrieval but a load is false. sent15: that the steamer is not a retrieval but it is a load is not right if it is phenomenal. sent16: something does coo Smolensk and it is phenomenal if it is not a dystrophy. sent17: the scriptorium does coo Smolensk. sent18: the fact that the steamer is not bulbar but it is a kind of a retrieval is not correct. sent19: that the pyelogram is a bargainer is right. sent20: the scriptorium is bulbar if it is a kind of a bargainer. sent21: the steamer is a dystrophy. sent22: there is something such that that it is a kind of a dystrophy is not false. sent23: the pyelogram does coo Smolensk. sent24: the pyelogram does not coo Smolensk if that the steamer is not a load is true. sent25: the scriptorium is not bulbar but it is a retrieval if that it is not phenomenal is not wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steamer is phenomenal.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the steamer is not a kind of a retrieval but it loads is false.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the pyelogram does not coo Smolensk.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the steamer is not phenomenal.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the steamer is non-noninstitutional thing that is a dystrophy.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not noninstitutional and it is a dystrophy.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the scriptorium is a bargainer.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis;
the scriptorium is not bulbar.
sent16 -> int8: if the steamer is not a kind of a dystrophy then it does coo Smolensk and it is phenomenal.; sent7 -> int9: if the steamer is not noninstitutional and it is not a bargainer it is not a dystrophy.; sent2 -> int10: if that the pyelogram is both seedless and not a Chimaeridae is incorrect then it is not seedless.; sent3 -> int11: something does not coo pyrolatry.; int11 & sent4 -> int12: that the pyelogram is seedless but it is not a Chimaeridae is wrong.; int10 & int12 -> int13: the pyelogram is not seedless.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that the fact that it is not seedless is not wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the scriptorium is not bulbar. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the scriptorium is a dystrophy is right. sent2: if that something is seedless and is not a Chimaeridae is wrong it is not seedless. sent3: the longicorn does not coo pyrolatry. sent4: if something does not coo pyrolatry the fact that the pyelogram is seedless and is not a Chimaeridae does not hold. sent5: if the steamer does coo Smolensk and it is not non-phenomenal then the scriptorium is not bulbar. sent6: if that the steamer is not phenomenal is not incorrect it is a kind of a dystrophy. sent7: if an institutional thing is not a kind of a bargainer then it is not a kind of a dystrophy. sent8: there exists something such that it is not noninstitutional. sent9: that the scriptorium is a bargainer is true if there exists something such that it is both not noninstitutional and a dystrophy. sent10: The Smolensk does coo pyelogram. sent11: there is something such that it is noninstitutional and it is a dystrophy. sent12: the steamer is not noninstitutional but it is a dystrophy if it is not phenomenal. sent13: the biophysicist is not noninstitutional but it is an altarpiece if it is not a pin-up. sent14: the pyelogram does not coo Smolensk if the fact that the steamer is not a retrieval but a load is false. sent15: that the steamer is not a retrieval but it is a load is not right if it is phenomenal. sent16: something does coo Smolensk and it is phenomenal if it is not a dystrophy. sent17: the scriptorium does coo Smolensk. sent18: the fact that the steamer is not bulbar but it is a kind of a retrieval is not correct. sent19: that the pyelogram is a bargainer is right. sent20: the scriptorium is bulbar if it is a kind of a bargainer. sent21: the steamer is a dystrophy. sent22: there is something such that that it is a kind of a dystrophy is not false. sent23: the pyelogram does coo Smolensk. sent24: the pyelogram does not coo Smolensk if that the steamer is not a load is true. sent25: the scriptorium is not bulbar but it is a retrieval if that it is not phenomenal is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the steamer is phenomenal.; sent15 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the steamer is not a kind of a retrieval but it loads is false.; int1 & sent14 -> int2: the pyelogram does not coo Smolensk.; int2 & sent23 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the steamer is not phenomenal.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: the steamer is non-noninstitutional thing that is a dystrophy.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is not noninstitutional and it is a dystrophy.; int6 & sent9 -> int7: the scriptorium is a bargainer.; int7 & sent20 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__