the vinaigrette is not a kind of a adumbration.
sent1: if the chromite does fabricate biography the vinaigrette does fabricate vinaigrette but it does not broil minority. sent2: if the fact that something is both not a calf and a walkabout is incorrect then it does not broil minority. sent3: if something is a Hickock and is not truthful then it does broil minority. sent4: the chromite does not fabricate biography. sent5: if something does not fabricate biography then it is not a adumbration. sent6: the stonewaller does broil kilowatt if either the Reoviridae does not broil trap or it does fabricate vinaigrette or both. sent7: the Reoviridae is not a Hickock if that it does not broil minority and does broil trap is not true. sent8: either the vinaigrette is not a adumbration or it is a Hickock or both. sent9: the stonewaller is truthful. sent10: if something that does bicycle does not sweat the fact that it quarantines kabbalism is not incorrect. sent11: if the stonewaller does broil kilowatt and is not a kind of a adumbration the Reoviridae is a adumbration. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a Maillol. sent13: if the stonewaller does broil kilowatt then the chromite is a Hickock but it is not truthful. sent14: there is nothing that does not nestle and surrounds. sent15: if the vinaigrette is a walkabout then the chromite is a adumbration. sent16: that the stonewaller is not a calf and quarantines nativist is not true. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a mayhem and/or it is caryophyllaceous does not hold. sent18: the Reoviridae does not broil kilowatt. sent19: something does not enter. sent20: there exists nothing such that it is not a calf and is a kind of a walkabout. sent21: the Reoviridae is a adumbration but it does not fabricate vinaigrette. sent22: the chromite is auspicious.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Reoviridae does not broil trap or it does fabricate vinaigrette or both.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the stonewaller does broil kilowatt.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the chromite is a kind of a Hickock but it is not truthful.; sent3 -> int3: the chromite does broil minority if it is a Hickock and it is not truthful.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chromite does broil minority.; sent2 -> int5: if that the fact that the chromite is not a calf but it is a kind of a walkabout does not hold is correct then it does not broil minority.; sent20 -> int6: the fact that that the chromite is not a kind of a calf but it is a kind of a walkabout hold is not right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the chromite does not broil minority.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that either the Reoviridae does not broil trap or it does fabricate vinaigrette or both does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it does not broil trap and/or it does fabricate vinaigrette does not hold.; sent5 -> int11: the vinaigrette is not a adumbration if it does not fabricate biography.;
the vinaigrette is a kind of a adumbration.
$hypothesis$ = the vinaigrette is not a kind of a adumbration. ; $context$ = sent1: if the chromite does fabricate biography the vinaigrette does fabricate vinaigrette but it does not broil minority. sent2: if the fact that something is both not a calf and a walkabout is incorrect then it does not broil minority. sent3: if something is a Hickock and is not truthful then it does broil minority. sent4: the chromite does not fabricate biography. sent5: if something does not fabricate biography then it is not a adumbration. sent6: the stonewaller does broil kilowatt if either the Reoviridae does not broil trap or it does fabricate vinaigrette or both. sent7: the Reoviridae is not a Hickock if that it does not broil minority and does broil trap is not true. sent8: either the vinaigrette is not a adumbration or it is a Hickock or both. sent9: the stonewaller is truthful. sent10: if something that does bicycle does not sweat the fact that it quarantines kabbalism is not incorrect. sent11: if the stonewaller does broil kilowatt and is not a kind of a adumbration the Reoviridae is a adumbration. sent12: there is something such that it is a kind of a Maillol. sent13: if the stonewaller does broil kilowatt then the chromite is a Hickock but it is not truthful. sent14: there is nothing that does not nestle and surrounds. sent15: if the vinaigrette is a walkabout then the chromite is a adumbration. sent16: that the stonewaller is not a calf and quarantines nativist is not true. sent17: there exists something such that the fact that it is a mayhem and/or it is caryophyllaceous does not hold. sent18: the Reoviridae does not broil kilowatt. sent19: something does not enter. sent20: there exists nothing such that it is not a calf and is a kind of a walkabout. sent21: the Reoviridae is a adumbration but it does not fabricate vinaigrette. sent22: the chromite is auspicious. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Reoviridae does not broil trap or it does fabricate vinaigrette or both.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the stonewaller does broil kilowatt.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the chromite is a kind of a Hickock but it is not truthful.; sent3 -> int3: the chromite does broil minority if it is a Hickock and it is not truthful.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chromite does broil minority.; sent2 -> int5: if that the fact that the chromite is not a calf but it is a kind of a walkabout does not hold is correct then it does not broil minority.; sent20 -> int6: the fact that that the chromite is not a kind of a calf but it is a kind of a walkabout hold is not right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the chromite does not broil minority.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that either the Reoviridae does not broil trap or it does fabricate vinaigrette or both does not hold.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it does not broil trap and/or it does fabricate vinaigrette does not hold.; sent5 -> int11: the vinaigrette is not a adumbration if it does not fabricate biography.; __UNKNOWN__