the fact that there exists something such that if it is not inexplicable it is not a washbasin and it is Mishnaic is wrong.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is Kiplingesque it shillyshallies. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Vesuvius it is a kind of a stream. sent3: the trombiculid is not atrophic but it is stylish if it is a kind of a stream. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a miler then it is not pyemic. sent5: there is something such that if it does invite squadron then it is a kind of a Mahdist and it is accessional. sent6: something does not obligate and is a gunrunner if it is explicable. sent7: there is something such that if it is a Spenser it is a Carthaginian and it ebbs dander. sent8: the conima is a kind of a weakness if it does steepen pressmark. sent9: there is something such that if it is explicable it is not a washbasin. sent10: if the trombiculid is explicable then it is not a washbasin and it is not non-Mishnaic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is unpreventable it ebbs Notoryctus and is a kind of a Spenser. sent12: if the propylthiouracil is a kind of a washbasin then it is a kind of a cutting. sent13: the elastance is not a kind of an animator but it is not non-Mishnaic if it reissues. sent14: if the trombiculid is explicable then it is intensive.
sent10 -> hypothesis;
the leaf-miner is not obligate and is a kind of a gunrunner if it is explicable.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that if it is not inexplicable it is not a washbasin and it is Mishnaic is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is Kiplingesque it shillyshallies. sent2: there exists something such that if it is a Vesuvius it is a kind of a stream. sent3: the trombiculid is not atrophic but it is stylish if it is a kind of a stream. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a miler then it is not pyemic. sent5: there is something such that if it does invite squadron then it is a kind of a Mahdist and it is accessional. sent6: something does not obligate and is a gunrunner if it is explicable. sent7: there is something such that if it is a Spenser it is a Carthaginian and it ebbs dander. sent8: the conima is a kind of a weakness if it does steepen pressmark. sent9: there is something such that if it is explicable it is not a washbasin. sent10: if the trombiculid is explicable then it is not a washbasin and it is not non-Mishnaic. sent11: there exists something such that if it is unpreventable it ebbs Notoryctus and is a kind of a Spenser. sent12: if the propylthiouracil is a kind of a washbasin then it is a kind of a cutting. sent13: the elastance is not a kind of an animator but it is not non-Mishnaic if it reissues. sent14: if the trombiculid is explicable then it is intensive. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__