the ebbing hospitableness occurs.
sent1: the courante does not occur. sent2: both the courante and the steepening optometry happens if the fact that the judicialness does not occur is right. sent3: that the arbitrariness happens hold. sent4: the courante but not the ebbing hospitableness happens if the steepening optometry occurs. sent5: if that the courante happens hold then the ebbing reinforcement does not occur but the arbitrariness occurs. sent6: that the ebbing hospitableness happens is caused by that the arbitrariness but not the courante happens.
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the arbitrariness but not the courante occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis;
the ebbing hospitableness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the ebbing hospitableness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the courante does not occur. sent2: both the courante and the steepening optometry happens if the fact that the judicialness does not occur is right. sent3: that the arbitrariness happens hold. sent4: the courante but not the ebbing hospitableness happens if the steepening optometry occurs. sent5: if that the courante happens hold then the ebbing reinforcement does not occur but the arbitrariness occurs. sent6: that the ebbing hospitableness happens is caused by that the arbitrariness but not the courante happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent1 -> int1: the arbitrariness but not the courante occurs.; sent6 & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__