the Mull does not blinker filthiness.
sent1: if the subthalamus is a benzofuran the glutethimide does not orchestrate glutethimide. sent2: the fact that the ultramarine is not sadistic hold if that it does embody and it is not a caesura is wrong. sent3: the fact that something does not orchestrate glutethimide and is not chimerical is not right if it is sadistic. sent4: if the glutethimide does not orchestrate glutethimide that it is both sadistic and not non-chimerical is incorrect. sent5: if the glutethimide is not chimerical then the Mull does not blinker filthiness. sent6: the subthalamus is a tuff. sent7: if the ultramarine is a caesura but it does not orchestrate bock the subthalamus is a benzofuran. sent8: the ultramarine does not embody if that it is a kind of a caesura and it does not orchestrate bock is not true. sent9: if something does orchestrate glutethimide it is not a benzofuran and does embody. sent10: the ultramarine embodies. sent11: the subthalamus is sadistic if it is a tuff.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ultramarine is a caesura and does not orchestrate bock is not correct.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the ultramarine does not embody.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the ultramarine is a caesura and does not orchestrate bock.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the subthalamus is a benzofuran.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the glutethimide does not orchestrate glutethimide is correct.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the glutethimide is sadistic and it is chimerical is not true.;
the Mull blinkers filthiness.
sent9 -> int7: if the ultramarine does orchestrate glutethimide then it is not a kind of a benzofuran and embodies.; sent3 -> int8: that the subthalamus does not orchestrate glutethimide and it is not chimerical does not hold if it is sadistic.; sent11 & sent6 -> int9: the subthalamus is sadistic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the subthalamus does not orchestrate glutethimide and it is not chimerical is false.; int10 -> int11: there exists something such that that it does not orchestrate glutethimide and it is not chimerical does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the Mull does not blinker filthiness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the subthalamus is a benzofuran the glutethimide does not orchestrate glutethimide. sent2: the fact that the ultramarine is not sadistic hold if that it does embody and it is not a caesura is wrong. sent3: the fact that something does not orchestrate glutethimide and is not chimerical is not right if it is sadistic. sent4: if the glutethimide does not orchestrate glutethimide that it is both sadistic and not non-chimerical is incorrect. sent5: if the glutethimide is not chimerical then the Mull does not blinker filthiness. sent6: the subthalamus is a tuff. sent7: if the ultramarine is a caesura but it does not orchestrate bock the subthalamus is a benzofuran. sent8: the ultramarine does not embody if that it is a kind of a caesura and it does not orchestrate bock is not true. sent9: if something does orchestrate glutethimide it is not a benzofuran and does embody. sent10: the ultramarine embodies. sent11: the subthalamus is sadistic if it is a tuff. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the ultramarine is a caesura and does not orchestrate bock is not correct.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the ultramarine does not embody.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the ultramarine is a caesura and does not orchestrate bock.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the subthalamus is a benzofuran.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the fact that the glutethimide does not orchestrate glutethimide is correct.; int5 & sent4 -> int6: the fact that the glutethimide is sadistic and it is chimerical is not true.; __UNKNOWN__