the bounding occurs.
sent1: the fact that the passerineness and the non-moreness occurs is wrong. sent2: that the moreness does not occur and the disavowing bunsen does not occur results in the nonpasserineness. sent3: the shogi does not occur if both the gesture and the low-techness occurs. sent4: the quietening results in that the boundedness occurs. sent5: if the drinking sacrum occurs the panhysterectomy does not occur. sent6: if that the panhysterectomy does not occur is not incorrect then the quietening occurs. sent7: if the gag does not occur then the fact that the disavowing bunsen but not the drinking sacrum occurs is wrong. sent8: the panhysterectomy does not occur if the fact that the fact that the disavowing bunsen occurs but the drinking sacrum does not occur is not true hold. sent9: that the drinking sacrum happens triggers that the moreness does not occur and the disavowing bunsen does not occur. sent10: the fact that the moreness does not occur is true if both the fulmination and the non-atypicalness happens. sent11: the passerineness occurs if that the nodding does not occur and/or the gynecologicalness does not occur does not hold. sent12: the fulmination happens but the atypicalness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gag happens.; sent10 & sent12 -> int1: that the moreness does not occur is true.;
the boundedness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the bounding occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the passerineness and the non-moreness occurs is wrong. sent2: that the moreness does not occur and the disavowing bunsen does not occur results in the nonpasserineness. sent3: the shogi does not occur if both the gesture and the low-techness occurs. sent4: the quietening results in that the boundedness occurs. sent5: if the drinking sacrum occurs the panhysterectomy does not occur. sent6: if that the panhysterectomy does not occur is not incorrect then the quietening occurs. sent7: if the gag does not occur then the fact that the disavowing bunsen but not the drinking sacrum occurs is wrong. sent8: the panhysterectomy does not occur if the fact that the fact that the disavowing bunsen occurs but the drinking sacrum does not occur is not true hold. sent9: that the drinking sacrum happens triggers that the moreness does not occur and the disavowing bunsen does not occur. sent10: the fact that the moreness does not occur is true if both the fulmination and the non-atypicalness happens. sent11: the passerineness occurs if that the nodding does not occur and/or the gynecologicalness does not occur does not hold. sent12: the fulmination happens but the atypicalness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the gag happens.; sent10 & sent12 -> int1: that the moreness does not occur is true.; __UNKNOWN__