the fact that the autologousness and/or the emplacement happens is not true.
sent1: that the nonintellectualness but not the Sovietsness happens is wrong if the autologousness does not occur. sent2: that the rice does not occur if that the nonintellectualness and the non-Sovietsness occurs is wrong is true. sent3: if that the Sovietsness does not occur is not true then the rice does not occur. sent4: that the nonintellectualness occurs and the Sovietsness occurs is not right. sent5: that the soliciting does not occur and the rice does not occur is not correct if the beholding Kerouac occurs. sent6: if the ceremony happens then the epic does not occur. sent7: the negotiating sufferance leads to that the easter does not occur and the soliciting does not occur. sent8: if the fact that not the autologousness but the ovarianness occurs does not hold the ovarianness does not occur. sent9: the beholding Kerouac occurs. sent10: the fact that the negotiating sufferance happens is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the autologousness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the nonintellectualness and the non-Sovietsness happens is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the ricing does not occur.; sent7 & sent10 -> int3: the easter does not occur and the soliciting does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the soliciting does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the soliciting does not occur and the ricing does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the soliciting does not occur and the ricing does not occur is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the autologousness happens.; int8 -> hypothesis;
that the autologousness happens or the emplacement occurs or both does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the autologousness and/or the emplacement happens is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: that the nonintellectualness but not the Sovietsness happens is wrong if the autologousness does not occur. sent2: that the rice does not occur if that the nonintellectualness and the non-Sovietsness occurs is wrong is true. sent3: if that the Sovietsness does not occur is not true then the rice does not occur. sent4: that the nonintellectualness occurs and the Sovietsness occurs is not right. sent5: that the soliciting does not occur and the rice does not occur is not correct if the beholding Kerouac occurs. sent6: if the ceremony happens then the epic does not occur. sent7: the negotiating sufferance leads to that the easter does not occur and the soliciting does not occur. sent8: if the fact that not the autologousness but the ovarianness occurs does not hold the ovarianness does not occur. sent9: the beholding Kerouac occurs. sent10: the fact that the negotiating sufferance happens is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the autologousness does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that both the nonintellectualness and the non-Sovietsness happens is false.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the ricing does not occur.; sent7 & sent10 -> int3: the easter does not occur and the soliciting does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the soliciting does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the soliciting does not occur and the ricing does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int6: the fact that the soliciting does not occur and the ricing does not occur is not correct.; int5 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the autologousness happens.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__