the gravida does build sabbatical.
sent1: if something does not flame obtrusiveness then the fact that the cavalryman does citify hemagglutination and does build stemmer is false. sent2: the fact that the headstall is not a Pomatomus is true if that the cavalryman does not citify hemagglutination but it builds stemmer is wrong. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a Pomatomus and does not citify hemagglutination is not correct then it does not build stemmer. sent4: the headstall is not a Pomatomus if the cavalryman citifies hemagglutination. sent5: the fact that the fact that the sternwheeler does not build staghound and is a kind of a postern is not wrong is wrong if it flames obtrusiveness. sent6: there is something such that it flames obtrusiveness. sent7: the gravida is a kind of a apposition. sent8: the fact that the hominy is not a kind of a Muskogee hold if the fact that it does not grouch and is insatiate is not true. sent9: the sternwheeler is not a kind of a postern. sent10: if the sternwheeler does flame obtrusiveness that it does not build staghound and it is not a postern is wrong. sent11: the fact that the hominy does not grouch and is insatiate is not correct. sent12: if that the headstall is not a Pomatomus is not false the gravida does not build sabbatical and is a apposition. sent13: the fact that the bluffer is not tuberculate is not correct. sent14: if the bluffer is tuberculate then the sternwheeler is not a postern. sent15: the luck does not citify hemagglutination. sent16: if the bluffer is tuberculate the sternwheeler does not build staghound and it is not a postern. sent17: the hominy is a apposition but it is not tuberculate if it is not a Muskogee. sent18: the fact that the cavalryman does not citify hemagglutination and does build stemmer is false if there is something such that it does not flame obtrusiveness. sent19: the fact that the sternwheeler does not build staghound but it is a postern does not hold. sent20: that the cavalryman citifies hemagglutination and it does build stemmer does not hold. sent21: the gravida is a apposition if the headstall is not a Pomatomus. sent22: if something does not build stemmer then it builds sabbatical and it does flame obtrusiveness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sternwheeler does flame obtrusiveness.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the sternwheeler does not build staghound and is not a postern is false.; sent16 & sent13 -> int2: the sternwheeler does not build staghound and is not a postern.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sternwheeler does not flame obtrusiveness.; int4 -> int5: something does not flame obtrusiveness.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: that the cavalryman does not citify hemagglutination and does build stemmer is false.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the headstall is not a kind of a Pomatomus.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the gravida does not build sabbatical and is a apposition.; int8 -> hypothesis;
the hominy builds sabbatical.
sent22 -> int9: if the hominy does not build stemmer it builds sabbatical and does flame obtrusiveness.; sent3 -> int10: the hominy does not build stemmer if that it is not a Pomatomus and it does not citify hemagglutination is incorrect.; sent8 & sent11 -> int11: the hominy is not a Muskogee.; sent17 & int11 -> int12: the hominy is both a apposition and not tuberculate.; int12 -> int13: the hominy is a apposition.;
$hypothesis$ = the gravida does build sabbatical. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not flame obtrusiveness then the fact that the cavalryman does citify hemagglutination and does build stemmer is false. sent2: the fact that the headstall is not a Pomatomus is true if that the cavalryman does not citify hemagglutination but it builds stemmer is wrong. sent3: if that something is not a kind of a Pomatomus and does not citify hemagglutination is not correct then it does not build stemmer. sent4: the headstall is not a Pomatomus if the cavalryman citifies hemagglutination. sent5: the fact that the fact that the sternwheeler does not build staghound and is a kind of a postern is not wrong is wrong if it flames obtrusiveness. sent6: there is something such that it flames obtrusiveness. sent7: the gravida is a kind of a apposition. sent8: the fact that the hominy is not a kind of a Muskogee hold if the fact that it does not grouch and is insatiate is not true. sent9: the sternwheeler is not a kind of a postern. sent10: if the sternwheeler does flame obtrusiveness that it does not build staghound and it is not a postern is wrong. sent11: the fact that the hominy does not grouch and is insatiate is not correct. sent12: if that the headstall is not a Pomatomus is not false the gravida does not build sabbatical and is a apposition. sent13: the fact that the bluffer is not tuberculate is not correct. sent14: if the bluffer is tuberculate then the sternwheeler is not a postern. sent15: the luck does not citify hemagglutination. sent16: if the bluffer is tuberculate the sternwheeler does not build staghound and it is not a postern. sent17: the hominy is a apposition but it is not tuberculate if it is not a Muskogee. sent18: the fact that the cavalryman does not citify hemagglutination and does build stemmer is false if there is something such that it does not flame obtrusiveness. sent19: the fact that the sternwheeler does not build staghound but it is a postern does not hold. sent20: that the cavalryman citifies hemagglutination and it does build stemmer does not hold. sent21: the gravida is a apposition if the headstall is not a Pomatomus. sent22: if something does not build stemmer then it builds sabbatical and it does flame obtrusiveness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sternwheeler does flame obtrusiveness.; sent10 & assump1 -> int1: that the sternwheeler does not build staghound and is not a postern is false.; sent16 & sent13 -> int2: the sternwheeler does not build staghound and is not a postern.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the sternwheeler does not flame obtrusiveness.; int4 -> int5: something does not flame obtrusiveness.; int5 & sent18 -> int6: that the cavalryman does not citify hemagglutination and does build stemmer is false.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the headstall is not a kind of a Pomatomus.; int7 & sent12 -> int8: the gravida does not build sabbatical and is a apposition.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__