that there is something such that it is supportive thing that communicates May is not right.
sent1: if the sausage is gloveless the snowsuit does spray republicanism. sent2: there exists something such that it does not splay iron. sent3: the megakaryocyte is a digoxin. sent4: the sausage is gloveless if that the megakaryocyte is not palpatory is not wrong. sent5: the megakaryocyte is non-palpatory if the rheometer is not a digoxin but it splays muskellunge. sent6: the fact that the snowsuit does communicate May is not wrong if the fact that the giver is a kind of a SOD that does not spray Atticus is not correct. sent7: the snowsuit is supportive if it does spray republicanism. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not splay iron the rheometer is not a digoxin but it splays muskellunge. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a SOD and does not spray Atticus is not right if it is not a bog. sent10: the rheometer communicates May. sent11: the giver does not bog.
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the rheometer is not a kind of a digoxin and splays muskellunge.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the megakaryocyte is not palpatory.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the sausage is gloveless hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the snowsuit sprays republicanism.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the snowsuit is supportive.; sent9 -> int6: that the giver is a SOD and does not spray Atticus does not hold if it is not a bog.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fact that the giver is a SOD that does not spray Atticus is not true.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the snowsuit does communicate May.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the snowsuit is supportive and it does communicate May.; int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there is something such that it is supportive thing that communicates May is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the sausage is gloveless the snowsuit does spray republicanism. sent2: there exists something such that it does not splay iron. sent3: the megakaryocyte is a digoxin. sent4: the sausage is gloveless if that the megakaryocyte is not palpatory is not wrong. sent5: the megakaryocyte is non-palpatory if the rheometer is not a digoxin but it splays muskellunge. sent6: the fact that the snowsuit does communicate May is not wrong if the fact that the giver is a kind of a SOD that does not spray Atticus is not correct. sent7: the snowsuit is supportive if it does spray republicanism. sent8: if there exists something such that it does not splay iron the rheometer is not a digoxin but it splays muskellunge. sent9: the fact that something is a kind of a SOD and does not spray Atticus is not right if it is not a bog. sent10: the rheometer communicates May. sent11: the giver does not bog. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent8 -> int1: the rheometer is not a kind of a digoxin and splays muskellunge.; int1 & sent5 -> int2: the megakaryocyte is not palpatory.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the fact that the sausage is gloveless hold.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the snowsuit sprays republicanism.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the snowsuit is supportive.; sent9 -> int6: that the giver is a SOD and does not spray Atticus does not hold if it is not a bog.; int6 & sent11 -> int7: the fact that the giver is a SOD that does not spray Atticus is not true.; sent6 & int7 -> int8: the snowsuit does communicate May.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the snowsuit is supportive and it does communicate May.; int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__