the bronchiole does beckon vasectomy.
sent1: if the bronchiole is not a kind of a selector the fact that the cetrimide is a kind of a Eucharist and/or it is a prang is incorrect. sent2: the sapphirine is non-orbital and/or it is not a cornered if the element is a PSF. sent3: if something is not orbital or it is not a cornered or both the shampoo is not orbital. sent4: if that the bill is a channelization but not orbital is not correct the fact that the bronchiole is not a kind of a channelization is true. sent5: the fact that the sapphirine does not beckon Ellison and does not gesticulate atresia does not hold. sent6: if that the sapphirine does not beckon Ellison and does not gesticulate atresia does not hold it does not osculate. sent7: if the cetrimide is not a selector that either the bronchiole is a selector or it is a kind of a prang or both is false. sent8: everything does not comfort and/or is not a lawsuit. sent9: if the sapphirine does not osculate the shampoo does not osculate. sent10: the shampoo gesticulates progestin if that the element denies Casmerodius but it is not a Pyrocephalus is not true. sent11: if something is not a channelization that it is a selector and is not a prang is not true. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not osculate then the element is a PSF. sent13: the cetrimide is not a kind of a selector if either it is not a comforts or it is not a kind of a lawsuit or both. sent14: if that the bronchiole is a kind of a selector and/or it does prang is incorrect then it does not beckon vasectomy. sent15: the fact that the element denies Casmerodius but it is not a Pyrocephalus is false. sent16: that something is a channelization that is not orbital is not right if it does not corner. sent17: if that something is a kind of a selector that is not a prang is false then it is not a selector. sent18: something does not osculate. sent19: if something does gesticulate progestin then it is not a PSF. sent20: that something is not a channelization but it beckons vasectomy is not right if it is not orbital. sent21: the crankcase does not prang and/or it is a buckskins.
sent8 -> int1: either the cetrimide is not a comforts or it is not a lawsuit or both.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the cetrimide is not a selector.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the bronchiole is a kind of a selector or is a prang or both does not hold.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the bronchiole does beckon vasectomy is not incorrect.
sent17 -> int4: the bronchiole is not a selector if the fact that it is a selector and not a prang is not true.; sent11 -> int5: that the bronchiole is a kind of a selector but it is not a prang does not hold if it is not a kind of a channelization.; sent16 -> int6: that the bill is both a channelization and not orbital is wrong if it is not a kind of a cornered.; sent19 -> int7: if the shampoo does gesticulate progestin it is not a PSF.; sent10 & sent15 -> int8: the shampoo does gesticulate progestin.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the shampoo is not a PSF.; sent6 & sent5 -> int10: the sapphirine does not osculate.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the shampoo does not osculate.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the shampoo is not a kind of a PSF and it does not osculate.; int12 -> int13: something is not a PSF and does not osculate.;
$hypothesis$ = the bronchiole does beckon vasectomy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the bronchiole is not a kind of a selector the fact that the cetrimide is a kind of a Eucharist and/or it is a prang is incorrect. sent2: the sapphirine is non-orbital and/or it is not a cornered if the element is a PSF. sent3: if something is not orbital or it is not a cornered or both the shampoo is not orbital. sent4: if that the bill is a channelization but not orbital is not correct the fact that the bronchiole is not a kind of a channelization is true. sent5: the fact that the sapphirine does not beckon Ellison and does not gesticulate atresia does not hold. sent6: if that the sapphirine does not beckon Ellison and does not gesticulate atresia does not hold it does not osculate. sent7: if the cetrimide is not a selector that either the bronchiole is a selector or it is a kind of a prang or both is false. sent8: everything does not comfort and/or is not a lawsuit. sent9: if the sapphirine does not osculate the shampoo does not osculate. sent10: the shampoo gesticulates progestin if that the element denies Casmerodius but it is not a Pyrocephalus is not true. sent11: if something is not a channelization that it is a selector and is not a prang is not true. sent12: if there exists something such that it does not osculate then the element is a PSF. sent13: the cetrimide is not a kind of a selector if either it is not a comforts or it is not a kind of a lawsuit or both. sent14: if that the bronchiole is a kind of a selector and/or it does prang is incorrect then it does not beckon vasectomy. sent15: the fact that the element denies Casmerodius but it is not a Pyrocephalus is false. sent16: that something is a channelization that is not orbital is not right if it does not corner. sent17: if that something is a kind of a selector that is not a prang is false then it is not a selector. sent18: something does not osculate. sent19: if something does gesticulate progestin then it is not a PSF. sent20: that something is not a channelization but it beckons vasectomy is not right if it is not orbital. sent21: the crankcase does not prang and/or it is a buckskins. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: either the cetrimide is not a comforts or it is not a lawsuit or both.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the cetrimide is not a selector.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: that the bronchiole is a kind of a selector or is a prang or both does not hold.; int3 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__