the unbrokenness occurs.
sent1: the fact that the inconsiderableness does not occur hold if the unbrokenness does not occur. sent2: the paroxysmalness does not occur. sent3: the non-recoverableness and the Aramaicness happens if the excelling occurs. sent4: that the unbrokenness happens and the rigging durum occurs is brought about by that the empiricness does not occur. sent5: the clouting Ufa does not occur if the entailing fleeting occurs. sent6: the clannishness does not occur. sent7: the Ionianness does not occur and the inconsiderableness does not occur if the unbrokenness does not occur. sent8: the gutsiness does not occur. sent9: if the rigging incandescence does not occur then the entailing fleeting occurs and/or the inertialness does not occur. sent10: the noncurrentness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the clouting Ufa does not occur is not false the indeterminateness happens and the exodus occurs. sent12: the empiricness does not occur and the clouting prose does not occur if the octalness happens. sent13: if not the recoverableness but the Aramaic happens then that the mandate does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the excelling happens and the stoppableness happens if that the clouting mainstay does not occur hold. sent15: if the clannishness does not occur and the indeterminateness occurs the clouting mainstay does not occur. sent16: the inconsiderableness does not occur. sent17: the Ionianness happens. sent18: the comeback occurs. sent19: if the mandating does not occur the octalness and the Capetian happens. sent20: the rigging incandescence does not occur and the imperialism does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the unbrokenness does not occur is not false.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Ionian does not occur and the inconsiderableness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Ionianness does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the rigging durum happens is correct.
sent20 -> int4: the rigging incandescence does not occur.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: either the entailing fleeting or the non-inertialness or both occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = the unbrokenness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the inconsiderableness does not occur hold if the unbrokenness does not occur. sent2: the paroxysmalness does not occur. sent3: the non-recoverableness and the Aramaicness happens if the excelling occurs. sent4: that the unbrokenness happens and the rigging durum occurs is brought about by that the empiricness does not occur. sent5: the clouting Ufa does not occur if the entailing fleeting occurs. sent6: the clannishness does not occur. sent7: the Ionianness does not occur and the inconsiderableness does not occur if the unbrokenness does not occur. sent8: the gutsiness does not occur. sent9: if the rigging incandescence does not occur then the entailing fleeting occurs and/or the inertialness does not occur. sent10: the noncurrentness does not occur. sent11: if the fact that the clouting Ufa does not occur is not false the indeterminateness happens and the exodus occurs. sent12: the empiricness does not occur and the clouting prose does not occur if the octalness happens. sent13: if not the recoverableness but the Aramaic happens then that the mandate does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the excelling happens and the stoppableness happens if that the clouting mainstay does not occur hold. sent15: if the clannishness does not occur and the indeterminateness occurs the clouting mainstay does not occur. sent16: the inconsiderableness does not occur. sent17: the Ionianness happens. sent18: the comeback occurs. sent19: if the mandating does not occur the octalness and the Capetian happens. sent20: the rigging incandescence does not occur and the imperialism does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the unbrokenness does not occur is not false.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the Ionian does not occur and the inconsiderableness does not occur.; int1 -> int2: the Ionianness does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__