the danaid is a petite that does shine Keynesian.
sent1: if the youth-on-age is a Alcott it is non-adscript. sent2: something is a petite and it shines Keynesian if it is not a vault. sent3: that the bluebottle is a vault and is not a Helenium is incorrect if the youth-on-age is not adscript. sent4: the parathion does not shine Keynesian if the fact that the bluebottle is a vault but it is not a Helenium is not true. sent5: the parathion does shine youth-on-age. sent6: the youth-on-age is non-adscript thing that does vault if the fact that the bluebottle does shine Keynesian is right. sent7: if the parathion does not shine Keynesian the fact that the danaid is a petite and it does shine Keynesian is false. sent8: the fact that the youth-on-age is not a Alcott and is petalous does not hold. sent9: the youth-on-age is a Helenium if it vaults. sent10: if that the youth-on-age is not a Alcott but it is petalous is not true then it is not adscript. sent11: if something shines youth-on-age that it does not accommodate stardust and it is not a kind of a voyeur is not correct. sent12: that the youth-on-age is adscript and it is a Helenium is false if the bluebottle does not coat danaid. sent13: if the bluebottle does coat danaid then it shines Keynesian. sent14: that the youth-on-age is both a Alcott and petalous is not correct.
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the youth-on-age is not adscript.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: that the bluebottle is a kind of a vault but it is not a Helenium is not right.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the parathion does not shine Keynesian.; sent7 & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the regular is a bubble and is not a Helenium is not correct.
$hypothesis$ = the danaid is a petite that does shine Keynesian. ; $context$ = sent1: if the youth-on-age is a Alcott it is non-adscript. sent2: something is a petite and it shines Keynesian if it is not a vault. sent3: that the bluebottle is a vault and is not a Helenium is incorrect if the youth-on-age is not adscript. sent4: the parathion does not shine Keynesian if the fact that the bluebottle is a vault but it is not a Helenium is not true. sent5: the parathion does shine youth-on-age. sent6: the youth-on-age is non-adscript thing that does vault if the fact that the bluebottle does shine Keynesian is right. sent7: if the parathion does not shine Keynesian the fact that the danaid is a petite and it does shine Keynesian is false. sent8: the fact that the youth-on-age is not a Alcott and is petalous does not hold. sent9: the youth-on-age is a Helenium if it vaults. sent10: if that the youth-on-age is not a Alcott but it is petalous is not true then it is not adscript. sent11: if something shines youth-on-age that it does not accommodate stardust and it is not a kind of a voyeur is not correct. sent12: that the youth-on-age is adscript and it is a Helenium is false if the bluebottle does not coat danaid. sent13: if the bluebottle does coat danaid then it shines Keynesian. sent14: that the youth-on-age is both a Alcott and petalous is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent8 -> int1: the youth-on-age is not adscript.; sent3 & int1 -> int2: that the bluebottle is a kind of a vault but it is not a Helenium is not right.; sent4 & int2 -> int3: the parathion does not shine Keynesian.; sent7 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__