the fact that the high-rise is not yogistic and not a gelignite does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the high-rise is not a mend and it is not yogistic is not right then the development does not bedew benignity. sent2: the development bedews benignity. sent3: if the fact that the stroboscope is not awake and does harry Corinth is not right that it does not attach hold. sent4: the fact that the flypaper bedews benignity or it does not seize or both is not correct if there exists something such that it does not attach. sent5: there exists nothing that does not awake and does harry Corinth. sent6: the adulteress is not a mend. sent7: the high-rise is not a gelignite. sent8: if that the high-rise is not yogistic and it is not a mend does not hold the development is not a gelignite. sent9: The benignity bedews development.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the high-rise is not a mend and it is not yogistic does not hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the development does not bedew benignity.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the high-rise does not mend and is not yogistic.; int3 -> int4: the high-rise is not yogistic.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the high-rise is not yogistic and it is not a gelignite does not hold.
sent5 -> int5: that the stroboscope is non-awake thing that harries Corinth is wrong.; sent3 & int5 -> int6: the stroboscope does not attach.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it does not attach.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the fact that the flypaper bedews benignity or does not seize or both is false.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that either it bedews benignity or it does not seize or both is not right.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the high-rise is not yogistic and not a gelignite does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the high-rise is not a mend and it is not yogistic is not right then the development does not bedew benignity. sent2: the development bedews benignity. sent3: if the fact that the stroboscope is not awake and does harry Corinth is not right that it does not attach hold. sent4: the fact that the flypaper bedews benignity or it does not seize or both is not correct if there exists something such that it does not attach. sent5: there exists nothing that does not awake and does harry Corinth. sent6: the adulteress is not a mend. sent7: the high-rise is not a gelignite. sent8: if that the high-rise is not yogistic and it is not a mend does not hold the development is not a gelignite. sent9: The benignity bedews development. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the high-rise is not a mend and it is not yogistic does not hold.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the development does not bedew benignity.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the high-rise does not mend and is not yogistic.; int3 -> int4: the high-rise is not yogistic.; int4 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__