the cynic stales.
sent1: that the thenar does not infuse and it is not a converter is not correct if there is something such that it does not hand subaltern. sent2: if the cynic does scintillate then it hares. sent3: if the crosshead does not disabuse chevrotain and is not a vicereine then the coprolite does disabuse chevrotain. sent4: the crosshead does not disabuse chevrotain and is not a kind of a vicereine if the Merlot is a kind of a converter. sent5: if that something does stale and does scintillate is not correct then it is not stale. sent6: the fact that the subaltern is not provocative is not correct. sent7: that the cynic does not scintillate is wrong if it is provocative. sent8: the fact that the tropics does not hand subaltern is not false. sent9: if the gearset is not a lamination or is provocative or both then the cynic is not provocative. sent10: the cynic does compliment. sent11: the Merlot is a kind of a converter if there is something such that the fact that it does not infuse and it is not a kind of a converter is not true. sent12: if the cynic is realistic then it overstrains thinness. sent13: if something is not provocative the fact that it is stale and scintillates is incorrect. sent14: something is not non-stale if it scintillates. sent15: the cynic is provocative.
sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the cynic does scintillate.; sent14 -> int2: the cynic is stale if it does scintillate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;
the cynic is non-stale.
sent5 -> int3: if that the cynic does stale and scintillates does not hold it does not stale.; sent13 -> int4: if the cynic is not provocative that it stales and it does scintillate does not hold.; sent8 -> int5: there is something such that it does not hand subaltern.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: that the thenar does not infuse and is not a kind of a converter is not true.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that the fact that it does not infuse and it is not a kind of a converter is not right.; int7 & sent11 -> int8: the Merlot is a converter.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the crosshead does not disabuse chevrotain and is not a vicereine.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the coprolite does disabuse chevrotain.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it disabuses chevrotain.;
$hypothesis$ = the cynic stales. ; $context$ = sent1: that the thenar does not infuse and it is not a converter is not correct if there is something such that it does not hand subaltern. sent2: if the cynic does scintillate then it hares. sent3: if the crosshead does not disabuse chevrotain and is not a vicereine then the coprolite does disabuse chevrotain. sent4: the crosshead does not disabuse chevrotain and is not a kind of a vicereine if the Merlot is a kind of a converter. sent5: if that something does stale and does scintillate is not correct then it is not stale. sent6: the fact that the subaltern is not provocative is not correct. sent7: that the cynic does not scintillate is wrong if it is provocative. sent8: the fact that the tropics does not hand subaltern is not false. sent9: if the gearset is not a lamination or is provocative or both then the cynic is not provocative. sent10: the cynic does compliment. sent11: the Merlot is a kind of a converter if there is something such that the fact that it does not infuse and it is not a kind of a converter is not true. sent12: if the cynic is realistic then it overstrains thinness. sent13: if something is not provocative the fact that it is stale and scintillates is incorrect. sent14: something is not non-stale if it scintillates. sent15: the cynic is provocative. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent15 -> int1: the cynic does scintillate.; sent14 -> int2: the cynic is stale if it does scintillate.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__