the fact that the tetrasporangium does corkscrew toddler if the monsoon is lipless is wrong.
sent1: that the cavetto is a kind of a tutorial is not false. sent2: the monsoon is not a kind of a tutorial but it is a gallery if there is something such that it is lipless. sent3: the Ischia is a kind of a gallery if the chuck is tutorial and it is a chumminess. sent4: the chuck is a kind of non-tutorial thing that is a chumminess if something is Rabelaisian. sent5: the Ischia is a kind of a drawl. sent6: if the fact that the chuck is a kind of non-tutorial thing that is a chumminess hold then the Ischia is a kind of a gallery. sent7: the tetrasporangium is a dictation. sent8: if there exists something such that it is Rabelaisian the chuck is not a tutorial. sent9: if that the shad is a chumminess is not false then the monsoon is a kind of Rabelaisian thing that is not lipless. sent10: the tetrasporangium is a tutorial. sent11: if the Ischia is a gallery the tetrasporangium corkscrews toddler. sent12: the chuck corkscrews toddler if the tetrasporangium is a tutorial. sent13: the tetrasporangium is a chumminess. sent14: if the monsoon is lipless then the shad is Rabelaisian. sent15: the chuck is not a kind of a tutorial. sent16: the Ischia is lipless. sent17: the shad does corkscrew toddler.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monsoon is lipless.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the shad is Rabelaisian is not false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is Rabelaisian.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the chuck is not a tutorial but it is a chumminess.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the Ischia is a kind of a gallery.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the tetrasporangium does corkscrew toddler.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the showpiece is a tutorial.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the tetrasporangium does corkscrew toddler if the monsoon is lipless is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: that the cavetto is a kind of a tutorial is not false. sent2: the monsoon is not a kind of a tutorial but it is a gallery if there is something such that it is lipless. sent3: the Ischia is a kind of a gallery if the chuck is tutorial and it is a chumminess. sent4: the chuck is a kind of non-tutorial thing that is a chumminess if something is Rabelaisian. sent5: the Ischia is a kind of a drawl. sent6: if the fact that the chuck is a kind of non-tutorial thing that is a chumminess hold then the Ischia is a kind of a gallery. sent7: the tetrasporangium is a dictation. sent8: if there exists something such that it is Rabelaisian the chuck is not a tutorial. sent9: if that the shad is a chumminess is not false then the monsoon is a kind of Rabelaisian thing that is not lipless. sent10: the tetrasporangium is a tutorial. sent11: if the Ischia is a gallery the tetrasporangium corkscrews toddler. sent12: the chuck corkscrews toddler if the tetrasporangium is a tutorial. sent13: the tetrasporangium is a chumminess. sent14: if the monsoon is lipless then the shad is Rabelaisian. sent15: the chuck is not a kind of a tutorial. sent16: the Ischia is lipless. sent17: the shad does corkscrew toddler. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the monsoon is lipless.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the shad is Rabelaisian is not false.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is Rabelaisian.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: the chuck is not a tutorial but it is a chumminess.; sent6 & int3 -> int4: the Ischia is a kind of a gallery.; sent11 & int4 -> int5: the tetrasporangium does corkscrew toddler.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__