the fact that there exists something such that that it either is not a kind of a wordnet or is not a convergence or both is not right is incorrect.
sent1: the scone is a Euterpe and it is a mercantilism if the fact that the ginger is not lossless is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that it does heal. sent3: the bilby is a kind of a wordnet if the motile does not heal. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is either not a wordnet or a convergence or both is not true. sent5: everything is a kind of a mercantilism and it is lossless. sent6: the ginger does heal. sent7: everything is lossless. sent8: if there is something such that it does not recast workpiece then the fact that the trireme is a capillary is true. sent9: something is a wordnet and not a convergence if it is a kind of a capillary. sent10: the bilby is not cardiographic but it is a mobile if the fact that the workpiece is disreputable hold. sent11: something does not defuse Haeckel but it does heal if it is not cardiographic. sent12: the ginger does defuse Haeckel. sent13: the scone is carroty if a wordnet is not a kind of a convergence. sent14: that the bilby is not a wordnet and/or it is not a convergence is not right if the motile does not heal. sent15: there is something such that it is not a wordnet and/or it is not a kind of a convergence. sent16: if the motile is a kind of a mercantilism that does heal then the ginger does not defuse Haeckel. sent17: the workpiece is disreputable. sent18: the fluorocarbon does not recast workpiece. sent19: The Haeckel does defuse ginger.
sent5 -> int1: the motile is a kind of a mercantilism and is lossless.; int1 -> int2: the motile is a mercantilism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the motile does heal.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the motile is a mercantilism and it does heal.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the ginger does not defuse Haeckel hold.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the motile does not heal.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that the bilby is not a wordnet and/or it is not a kind of a convergence does not hold.; int7 -> hypothesis;
the scone is carroty and is a kind of a Euterpe.
sent9 -> int8: the trireme is a kind of a wordnet that is not a convergence if it is a kind of a capillary.; sent18 -> int9: there is something such that it does not recast workpiece.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the trireme is a capillary.; int8 & int10 -> int11: the trireme is a wordnet but it is not a convergence.; int11 -> int12: there is something such that it is a wordnet and it is not a kind of a convergence.; int12 & sent13 -> int13: the scone is carroty.; sent11 -> int14: the bilby does not defuse Haeckel and heals if it is not cardiographic.; sent10 & sent17 -> int15: the bilby is not cardiographic and not immobile.; int15 -> int16: the bilby is not cardiographic.; int14 & int16 -> int17: the bilby does not defuse Haeckel but it heals.; int17 -> int18: there is something such that it does not defuse Haeckel and does heal.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that that it either is not a kind of a wordnet or is not a convergence or both is not right is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the scone is a Euterpe and it is a mercantilism if the fact that the ginger is not lossless is not incorrect. sent2: there is something such that it does heal. sent3: the bilby is a kind of a wordnet if the motile does not heal. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is either not a wordnet or a convergence or both is not true. sent5: everything is a kind of a mercantilism and it is lossless. sent6: the ginger does heal. sent7: everything is lossless. sent8: if there is something such that it does not recast workpiece then the fact that the trireme is a capillary is true. sent9: something is a wordnet and not a convergence if it is a kind of a capillary. sent10: the bilby is not cardiographic but it is a mobile if the fact that the workpiece is disreputable hold. sent11: something does not defuse Haeckel but it does heal if it is not cardiographic. sent12: the ginger does defuse Haeckel. sent13: the scone is carroty if a wordnet is not a kind of a convergence. sent14: that the bilby is not a wordnet and/or it is not a convergence is not right if the motile does not heal. sent15: there is something such that it is not a wordnet and/or it is not a kind of a convergence. sent16: if the motile is a kind of a mercantilism that does heal then the ginger does not defuse Haeckel. sent17: the workpiece is disreputable. sent18: the fluorocarbon does not recast workpiece. sent19: The Haeckel does defuse ginger. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the motile is a kind of a mercantilism and is lossless.; int1 -> int2: the motile is a mercantilism.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the motile does heal.; int2 & assump1 -> int3: the motile is a mercantilism and it does heal.; int3 & sent16 -> int4: that the ginger does not defuse Haeckel hold.; int4 & sent12 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the motile does not heal.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the fact that the bilby is not a wordnet and/or it is not a kind of a convergence does not hold.; int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__