the nudnik is a reprisal and is legal.
sent1: the fact that the graham is a reprisal and is not a Shinto is not true if the spicemill is a leeward. sent2: the fact that the nudnik is non-stale is not incorrect if it is single-lane. sent3: something is legal if it is not Shinto and it is not a kind of a leeward. sent4: if something is an overproduction the fact that the spicemill does not stale and is not an overproduction is wrong. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of a reprisal that is not Shinto is not correct then it is not a reprisal. sent6: if the fact that the graham is a Gehrig and it is an ellipse is not right it is not a kind of a leeward. sent7: if something does not stale then it is a reprisal and it is an overproduction. sent8: if the haemosporidian is single-lane the PIN is a kind of an overproduction. sent9: the nudnik is not a Shinto and not leeward if the graham is leeward. sent10: something that is not a leeward is an ellipse that is a kind of an overproduction. sent11: the haemosporidian is single-lane. sent12: the nudnik is single-lane. sent13: the graham is non-Shinto if that it does not destain semanticist is not wrong.
sent3 -> int1: if the nudnik is not a Shinto and it is not leeward it is legal.; sent7 -> int2: if the nudnik does not stale it is a reprisal and it is an overproduction.; sent2 & sent12 -> int3: the nudnik does not stale.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the nudnik is a reprisal and it is an overproduction.; int4 -> int5: the nudnik is a kind of a reprisal.;
the fact that the nudnik is a reprisal and it is legal does not hold.
sent5 -> int6: if that the graham is a reprisal and is not a Shinto is not correct then it is not a reprisal.; sent8 & sent11 -> int7: the PIN is an overproduction.; int7 -> int8: something is an overproduction.; int8 & sent4 -> int9: that the spicemill is not stale and is not an overproduction is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the nudnik is a reprisal and is legal. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the graham is a reprisal and is not a Shinto is not true if the spicemill is a leeward. sent2: the fact that the nudnik is non-stale is not incorrect if it is single-lane. sent3: something is legal if it is not Shinto and it is not a kind of a leeward. sent4: if something is an overproduction the fact that the spicemill does not stale and is not an overproduction is wrong. sent5: if the fact that something is a kind of a reprisal that is not Shinto is not correct then it is not a reprisal. sent6: if the fact that the graham is a Gehrig and it is an ellipse is not right it is not a kind of a leeward. sent7: if something does not stale then it is a reprisal and it is an overproduction. sent8: if the haemosporidian is single-lane the PIN is a kind of an overproduction. sent9: the nudnik is not a Shinto and not leeward if the graham is leeward. sent10: something that is not a leeward is an ellipse that is a kind of an overproduction. sent11: the haemosporidian is single-lane. sent12: the nudnik is single-lane. sent13: the graham is non-Shinto if that it does not destain semanticist is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the nudnik is not a Shinto and it is not leeward it is legal.; sent7 -> int2: if the nudnik does not stale it is a reprisal and it is an overproduction.; sent2 & sent12 -> int3: the nudnik does not stale.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the nudnik is a reprisal and it is an overproduction.; int4 -> int5: the nudnik is a kind of a reprisal.; __UNKNOWN__