the Bluegrass does utilize and is epiphyseal.
sent1: the Bluegrass is epiphyseal if the jimmies is a kind of a reactionary. sent2: the Bluegrass is a patentee if the VDU is a patentee. sent3: the fact that the hymenium is not neritic and it is not an escape is not right if the hamper is a Whig. sent4: the hamper is a Whig and it is astrophysical if the criminologist does not outshout gumbo-limbo. sent5: there exists something such that it is both not a Laffer and not a fieriness. sent6: if the mistress evens spinnbarkeit the floater does evens spinnbarkeit. sent7: if there is something such that that it is pyrogenic and it is not a kind of a patentee is incorrect then the VDU is a patentee. sent8: the fact that the Bluegrass is a kind of a patentee is right. sent9: the Bluegrass is not prudent. sent10: if the floater does even spinnbarkeit that it is pyrogenic and it is not a patentee is not correct. sent11: if the fact that something does outshout gumbo-limbo but it is not Hanoverian is false then it does not outshout gumbo-limbo. sent12: the mistress is not nonhuman if the gumbo-limbo does prank. sent13: if that the Bluegrass does utilize and is not prudent is not correct the jimmies does not utilize. sent14: if the fact that the mistress is a kind of a Lancastrian hold the floater does even spinnbarkeit. sent15: something is Lancastrian and/or it evens spinnbarkeit if it is not nonhuman. sent16: something either does prank or is not a bluetick or both if it is not a kind of a consumptive. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Laffer and is not a fieriness the jimmies is a reactionary. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is both not neritic and not an escape hold does not hold the gumbo-limbo is non-consumptive. sent19: if the gumbo-limbo is not a bluetick the mistress is not nonhuman. sent20: the jimmies is epiphyseal thing that is a patentee if it is not a kind of a reactionary. sent21: there is something such that that it is non-bibliomaniacal thing that does not houseclean twerp is not right. sent22: the locksmith is a reactionary and it is epiphyseal if the jimmies does not utilize. sent23: the dioon is a kind of an embodiment if there is something such that that it is not bibliomaniacal and does not houseclean twerp does not hold. sent24: the fact that the criminologist does outshout gumbo-limbo but it is not a kind of a Hanoverian is incorrect if the dioon is an embodiment.
sent5 & sent17 -> int1: the jimmies is a kind of a reactionary.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the Bluegrass is epiphyseal is right.;
the fact that the locksmith is a kind of a reactionary is true.
sent15 -> int3: that the fact that either the mistress is a kind of the Lancastrian or it does even spinnbarkeit or both is correct if the mistress is not nonhuman is not wrong.; sent16 -> int4: the gumbo-limbo does prank or it is not a bluetick or both if it is not consumptive.; sent11 -> int5: if that the criminologist does outshout gumbo-limbo but it is not Hanoverian does not hold it does not outshout gumbo-limbo.; sent21 & sent23 -> int6: the dioon is an embodiment.; sent24 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the criminologist outshouts gumbo-limbo and is not Hanoverian is not correct.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the criminologist does not outshout gumbo-limbo.; sent4 & int8 -> int9: the hamper is a Whig that is astrophysical.; int9 -> int10: the hamper is a Whig.; sent3 & int10 -> int11: that the hymenium is not neritic and it does not escape is false.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that that it is not neritic and it does not escape does not hold.; int12 & sent18 -> int13: that the gumbo-limbo is non-consumptive is not incorrect.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the gumbo-limbo pranks or it is not a bluetick or both.; int14 & sent12 & sent19 -> int15: the mistress is not nonhuman.; int3 & int15 -> int16: the mistress is a kind of a Lancastrian and/or does even spinnbarkeit.; int16 & sent14 & sent6 -> int17: the fact that the floater does even spinnbarkeit hold.; sent10 & int17 -> int18: that the floater is both not non-pyrogenic and not a patentee is not true.; int18 -> int19: there exists something such that that it is a kind of pyrogenic thing that is not a kind of a patentee is not true.; int19 & sent7 -> int20: the VDU is a kind of a patentee.; sent2 & int20 -> int21: that the Bluegrass is a patentee is right.;
$hypothesis$ = the Bluegrass does utilize and is epiphyseal. ; $context$ = sent1: the Bluegrass is epiphyseal if the jimmies is a kind of a reactionary. sent2: the Bluegrass is a patentee if the VDU is a patentee. sent3: the fact that the hymenium is not neritic and it is not an escape is not right if the hamper is a Whig. sent4: the hamper is a Whig and it is astrophysical if the criminologist does not outshout gumbo-limbo. sent5: there exists something such that it is both not a Laffer and not a fieriness. sent6: if the mistress evens spinnbarkeit the floater does evens spinnbarkeit. sent7: if there is something such that that it is pyrogenic and it is not a kind of a patentee is incorrect then the VDU is a patentee. sent8: the fact that the Bluegrass is a kind of a patentee is right. sent9: the Bluegrass is not prudent. sent10: if the floater does even spinnbarkeit that it is pyrogenic and it is not a patentee is not correct. sent11: if the fact that something does outshout gumbo-limbo but it is not Hanoverian is false then it does not outshout gumbo-limbo. sent12: the mistress is not nonhuman if the gumbo-limbo does prank. sent13: if that the Bluegrass does utilize and is not prudent is not correct the jimmies does not utilize. sent14: if the fact that the mistress is a kind of a Lancastrian hold the floater does even spinnbarkeit. sent15: something is Lancastrian and/or it evens spinnbarkeit if it is not nonhuman. sent16: something either does prank or is not a bluetick or both if it is not a kind of a consumptive. sent17: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a Laffer and is not a fieriness the jimmies is a reactionary. sent18: if there is something such that the fact that the fact that it is both not neritic and not an escape hold does not hold the gumbo-limbo is non-consumptive. sent19: if the gumbo-limbo is not a bluetick the mistress is not nonhuman. sent20: the jimmies is epiphyseal thing that is a patentee if it is not a kind of a reactionary. sent21: there is something such that that it is non-bibliomaniacal thing that does not houseclean twerp is not right. sent22: the locksmith is a reactionary and it is epiphyseal if the jimmies does not utilize. sent23: the dioon is a kind of an embodiment if there is something such that that it is not bibliomaniacal and does not houseclean twerp does not hold. sent24: the fact that the criminologist does outshout gumbo-limbo but it is not a kind of a Hanoverian is incorrect if the dioon is an embodiment. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent17 -> int1: the jimmies is a kind of a reactionary.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the fact that the Bluegrass is epiphyseal is right.; __UNKNOWN__