the amberjack is nihilistic.
sent1: the amberjack is not a kind of a network or is not nihilistic or both. sent2: if the CD is not a network and/or it does not conglutinate then the amberjack is unwelcome. sent3: the airs does not condescend if the Vaishnava does not scale propositus. sent4: the amberjack is unwelcome if the CD does not conglutinate. sent5: the CD is not a network and/or it does not conglutinate. sent6: the airs does condescend. sent7: if the CD does scale propositus and it is a network the Vaishnava does not condescend. sent8: the amberjack does not condescend. sent9: the Vaishnava does not scale propositus if the fact that the amberjack is unwelcome thing that is nihilistic is true. sent10: the Vaishnava does not conglutinate. sent11: that the CD is unwelcome is true if it does scale propositus. sent12: the CD is not a network and/or it does conglutinate.
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the amberjack is unwelcome.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amberjack is nihilistic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the amberjack is unwelcome and is nihilistic.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the Vaishnava does not scale propositus hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the airs does not condescend.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the cementum does conglutinate.
$hypothesis$ = the amberjack is nihilistic. ; $context$ = sent1: the amberjack is not a kind of a network or is not nihilistic or both. sent2: if the CD is not a network and/or it does not conglutinate then the amberjack is unwelcome. sent3: the airs does not condescend if the Vaishnava does not scale propositus. sent4: the amberjack is unwelcome if the CD does not conglutinate. sent5: the CD is not a network and/or it does not conglutinate. sent6: the airs does condescend. sent7: if the CD does scale propositus and it is a network the Vaishnava does not condescend. sent8: the amberjack does not condescend. sent9: the Vaishnava does not scale propositus if the fact that the amberjack is unwelcome thing that is nihilistic is true. sent10: the Vaishnava does not conglutinate. sent11: that the CD is unwelcome is true if it does scale propositus. sent12: the CD is not a network and/or it does conglutinate. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent5 -> int1: the amberjack is unwelcome.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the amberjack is nihilistic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the amberjack is unwelcome and is nihilistic.; int2 & sent9 -> int3: that the Vaishnava does not scale propositus hold.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: the airs does not condescend.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__