the sedge is not a judgment.
sent1: if something that spends tannin is a kind of a judgment it is a kind of a leotard. sent2: the neutrino does not spend tannin. sent3: if a cords is not a grosgrain then it is a kind of a huddle. sent4: the Hegelian spends tannin and it does ulcerate. sent5: if the Hegelian is a cords then the fact that it does stagger and is not a kind of a leotard does not hold. sent6: the fact that the sedge is not a judgment is not wrong if the Hegelian is not a judgment. sent7: the fact that the vouchee does not chasten risibility and does not stagger does not hold if the radicle is a leotard. sent8: the vouchee ulcerates if it spends tannin and it does chasten risibility. sent9: if the vouchee ulcerates then the Hegelian does not chasten risibility. sent10: if the fact that the neutrino is a leotard hold then the radicle is a cords. sent11: if the neutrino is not a cords then the northerly cords but it is not a kind of a grosgrain. sent12: something does not chasten risibility if that it staggers and is not a kind of a leotard is not correct. sent13: something does fence. sent14: if the northerly is a kind of a huddle the sedge is a judgment. sent15: that the sedge is a leotard hold if the radicle is a kind of a judgment. sent16: if the Hegelian does ulcerate then that the vouchee does not chasten risibility is not true. sent17: the Hegelian spends tannin. sent18: if the fact that the radicle does not stagger and is a leotard is incorrect then the neutrino does not cord. sent19: if something is a kind of a leotard that the Hegelian does not spend tannin and does ulcerate is not correct. sent20: the radicle does not ulcerate if the Hegelian does not spend tannin. sent21: if something is a kind of a cords that is a kind of a grosgrain it is a kind of a huddle. sent22: the fact that something does not spend tannin but it ulcerates is not true if it does not chasten risibility. sent23: the Hegelian is a huddle and it is a cords if it is not a grosgrain. sent24: the fact that the radicle does not stagger but it is a leotard is incorrect if something does chasten risibility. sent25: if the vouchee does spend tannin and it ulcerates then the Hegelian is not a judgment. sent26: that the northerly is not a kind of a grosgrain is right if the neutrino is not a cords.
sent4 -> int1: the Hegelian does ulcerate.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the vouchee chastens risibility.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it chastens risibility.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the radicle does not stagger but it is a leotard is wrong.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the neutrino is not a cords.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the northerly is a cords but it is not a grosgrain.; sent3 -> int7: if the northerly does cord but it is not a grosgrain it does huddle.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the northerly is a huddle.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
the sedge is not a kind of a judgment.
sent22 -> int9: if the Hegelian does not chasten risibility that it does not spend tannin and it does ulcerate is not right.; sent12 -> int10: the Hegelian does not chasten risibility if that it does stagger and is not a leotard is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the sedge is not a judgment. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that spends tannin is a kind of a judgment it is a kind of a leotard. sent2: the neutrino does not spend tannin. sent3: if a cords is not a grosgrain then it is a kind of a huddle. sent4: the Hegelian spends tannin and it does ulcerate. sent5: if the Hegelian is a cords then the fact that it does stagger and is not a kind of a leotard does not hold. sent6: the fact that the sedge is not a judgment is not wrong if the Hegelian is not a judgment. sent7: the fact that the vouchee does not chasten risibility and does not stagger does not hold if the radicle is a leotard. sent8: the vouchee ulcerates if it spends tannin and it does chasten risibility. sent9: if the vouchee ulcerates then the Hegelian does not chasten risibility. sent10: if the fact that the neutrino is a leotard hold then the radicle is a cords. sent11: if the neutrino is not a cords then the northerly cords but it is not a kind of a grosgrain. sent12: something does not chasten risibility if that it staggers and is not a kind of a leotard is not correct. sent13: something does fence. sent14: if the northerly is a kind of a huddle the sedge is a judgment. sent15: that the sedge is a leotard hold if the radicle is a kind of a judgment. sent16: if the Hegelian does ulcerate then that the vouchee does not chasten risibility is not true. sent17: the Hegelian spends tannin. sent18: if the fact that the radicle does not stagger and is a leotard is incorrect then the neutrino does not cord. sent19: if something is a kind of a leotard that the Hegelian does not spend tannin and does ulcerate is not correct. sent20: the radicle does not ulcerate if the Hegelian does not spend tannin. sent21: if something is a kind of a cords that is a kind of a grosgrain it is a kind of a huddle. sent22: the fact that something does not spend tannin but it ulcerates is not true if it does not chasten risibility. sent23: the Hegelian is a huddle and it is a cords if it is not a grosgrain. sent24: the fact that the radicle does not stagger but it is a leotard is incorrect if something does chasten risibility. sent25: if the vouchee does spend tannin and it ulcerates then the Hegelian is not a judgment. sent26: that the northerly is not a kind of a grosgrain is right if the neutrino is not a cords. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: the Hegelian does ulcerate.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the vouchee chastens risibility.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it chastens risibility.; int3 & sent24 -> int4: the fact that the radicle does not stagger but it is a leotard is wrong.; int4 & sent18 -> int5: the neutrino is not a cords.; int5 & sent11 -> int6: the northerly is a cords but it is not a grosgrain.; sent3 -> int7: if the northerly does cord but it is not a grosgrain it does huddle.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the northerly is a huddle.; int8 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__