the diarist does not festoon Avestan.
sent1: the whiptail festoons Avestan. sent2: the fact that the shill is not non-Finnish but it is not a bulimic is wrong. sent3: the whiptail does birdnest molality and/or is a kind of a Hohenlinden if there is something such that it does strand marking. sent4: the heterospory is a Rasht and it festoons Avestan. sent5: the shill is not a kind of a Rasht. sent6: if the pyroelectricity does not strand marking then the fact that the diarist festoons triazine and is not a Rasht is incorrect. sent7: if the whiptail does birdnest molality then the shill is a Finnish. sent8: something is a Finnish and not a Hohenlinden if it is a bulimic. sent9: the fact that the Pharaoh is not a Rasht is right if the heterospory is a kind of a Rasht that does festoon Avestan. sent10: the shill is non-bulimic. sent11: if something is a bulimic it is a kind of a Finnish. sent12: if something that is a Finnish is not a Hohenlinden then the diarist does not birdnest molality. sent13: the fact that if that the diarist does festoon triazine and is not the Rasht does not hold the diarist does not festoon Avestan hold. sent14: if the whiptail strands marking that the diarist is both a Wavell and not a chain is wrong. sent15: the correspondent serves and does not festoon Avestan. sent16: the fact that if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Rasht the shill festoons Avestan and/or is a bulimic is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that the diarist does festoon triazine and it is a kind of a Rasht is not right if that the pyroelectricity does not strand marking is not wrong. sent18: that that the diarist does festoon triazine and it is a Rasht is not true hold. sent19: the diarist is not Finnish. sent20: the activation is a bulimic that festoons triazine if the Pharaoh is not a Rasht. sent21: if the diarist is a Rasht it does not festoon Avestan.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pyroelectricity strands marking.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it strands marking.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the whiptail does birdnest molality and/or it is a kind of a Hohenlinden.;
that the diarist is a kind of a Wavell that does not chain is false.
sent11 -> int3: if the activation is a bulimic it is a kind of a Finnish.; sent9 & sent4 -> int4: that the Pharaoh is not a kind of a Rasht is correct.; sent20 & int4 -> int5: the activation is a kind of bulimic thing that festoons triazine.; int5 -> int6: the activation is a bulimic.; int3 & int6 -> int7: the activation is a kind of a Finnish.; int7 -> int8: something is Finnish.;
$hypothesis$ = the diarist does not festoon Avestan. ; $context$ = sent1: the whiptail festoons Avestan. sent2: the fact that the shill is not non-Finnish but it is not a bulimic is wrong. sent3: the whiptail does birdnest molality and/or is a kind of a Hohenlinden if there is something such that it does strand marking. sent4: the heterospory is a Rasht and it festoons Avestan. sent5: the shill is not a kind of a Rasht. sent6: if the pyroelectricity does not strand marking then the fact that the diarist festoons triazine and is not a Rasht is incorrect. sent7: if the whiptail does birdnest molality then the shill is a Finnish. sent8: something is a Finnish and not a Hohenlinden if it is a bulimic. sent9: the fact that the Pharaoh is not a Rasht is right if the heterospory is a kind of a Rasht that does festoon Avestan. sent10: the shill is non-bulimic. sent11: if something is a bulimic it is a kind of a Finnish. sent12: if something that is a Finnish is not a Hohenlinden then the diarist does not birdnest molality. sent13: the fact that if that the diarist does festoon triazine and is not the Rasht does not hold the diarist does not festoon Avestan hold. sent14: if the whiptail strands marking that the diarist is both a Wavell and not a chain is wrong. sent15: the correspondent serves and does not festoon Avestan. sent16: the fact that if there exists something such that it is a kind of a Rasht the shill festoons Avestan and/or is a bulimic is not incorrect. sent17: the fact that the diarist does festoon triazine and it is a kind of a Rasht is not right if that the pyroelectricity does not strand marking is not wrong. sent18: that that the diarist does festoon triazine and it is a Rasht is not true hold. sent19: the diarist is not Finnish. sent20: the activation is a bulimic that festoons triazine if the Pharaoh is not a Rasht. sent21: if the diarist is a Rasht it does not festoon Avestan. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pyroelectricity strands marking.; assump1 -> int1: there exists something such that it strands marking.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the whiptail does birdnest molality and/or it is a kind of a Hohenlinden.; __UNKNOWN__