that the moor is a kind of a bullnose and it is a grogram is not true.
sent1: something squinches Lumpenus if the fact that it does not explicate and it is a grogram is not correct. sent2: that the moor is not basilar but it is vasomotor is not correct if the cunner is not vasomotor. sent3: there exists something such that it is indeterminable. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a 1830s hold the moor is a bullnose and is a kind of a perineurium. sent5: the triode does not tweet if something is a bullnose. sent6: if something is indeterminable then the cunner is both not a healthcare and not vasomotor. sent7: the gem is a Linaceae and it is a 1830s. sent8: that something is a grogram if the fact that it is non-basilar thing that is vasomotor does not hold is not incorrect.
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the cunner is not a healthcare and is not vasomotor.; int1 -> int2: the cunner is not vasomotor.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the moor is not basilar and is vasomotor is not right.; sent8 -> int4: the moor is a grogram if that it is not basilar and it is vasomotor does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the moor is a grogram.; sent7 -> int6: the gem is a 1830s.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a 1830s.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the moor is a bullnose and is a kind of a perineurium.; int8 -> int9: the moor is a kind of a bullnose.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the gametocyte does squinch Lumpenus if that it does not explicate and it is a grogram does not hold.
sent1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the moor is a kind of a bullnose and it is a grogram is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: something squinches Lumpenus if the fact that it does not explicate and it is a grogram is not correct. sent2: that the moor is not basilar but it is vasomotor is not correct if the cunner is not vasomotor. sent3: there exists something such that it is indeterminable. sent4: if there exists something such that that it is a kind of a 1830s hold the moor is a bullnose and is a kind of a perineurium. sent5: the triode does not tweet if something is a bullnose. sent6: if something is indeterminable then the cunner is both not a healthcare and not vasomotor. sent7: the gem is a Linaceae and it is a 1830s. sent8: that something is a grogram if the fact that it is non-basilar thing that is vasomotor does not hold is not incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent6 -> int1: the cunner is not a healthcare and is not vasomotor.; int1 -> int2: the cunner is not vasomotor.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the fact that the moor is not basilar and is vasomotor is not right.; sent8 -> int4: the moor is a grogram if that it is not basilar and it is vasomotor does not hold.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the moor is a grogram.; sent7 -> int6: the gem is a 1830s.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is a 1830s.; int7 & sent4 -> int8: the moor is a bullnose and is a kind of a perineurium.; int8 -> int9: the moor is a kind of a bullnose.; int5 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__