the fact that there is something such that if it is a busload and it is a kind of a currier then it does not subtilize crop is correct.
sent1: if the endonuclease is a kind of a busload that is a currier then the fact that it subtilizes crop is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is a busload and is a currier then it does subtilize crop. sent3: if the endonuclease is a bumf that does subtilize crop it is not a kind of a Ichthyosauridae. sent4: there exists something such that if it appropriates respondent and does spirit then it is not a lighterage. sent5: the endonuclease does not subtilize crop if it is a kind of a busload that is a kind of a currier. sent6: the oxidation-reduction is not an excuse if the fact that it is a currier and it does incarnate is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of pro-choice thing that subtilizes oxidation-reduction then it is not resistless. sent8: if something is a one-ninth and does glom tea-strainer it is not resistless. sent9: if the endonuclease does subtilize crop and it is neurophysiological it is not a Mahan.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that if it is a kind of a one-ninth that does glom tea-strainer the fact that it is not resistless is correct.
sent8 -> int1: the limey is not resistless if it is a one-ninth that gloms tea-strainer.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a busload and it is a kind of a currier then it does not subtilize crop is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the endonuclease is a kind of a busload that is a currier then the fact that it subtilizes crop is true. sent2: there is something such that if it is a busload and is a currier then it does subtilize crop. sent3: if the endonuclease is a bumf that does subtilize crop it is not a kind of a Ichthyosauridae. sent4: there exists something such that if it appropriates respondent and does spirit then it is not a lighterage. sent5: the endonuclease does not subtilize crop if it is a kind of a busload that is a kind of a currier. sent6: the oxidation-reduction is not an excuse if the fact that it is a currier and it does incarnate is right. sent7: there is something such that if it is a kind of pro-choice thing that subtilizes oxidation-reduction then it is not resistless. sent8: if something is a one-ninth and does glom tea-strainer it is not resistless. sent9: if the endonuclease does subtilize crop and it is neurophysiological it is not a Mahan. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__