the amphotericin does sequence boringness.
sent1: there is something such that it does sequence boringness. sent2: something is not a intoxicant if the fact that it is not a kind of a shank and does sequence indistinctness is not true. sent3: something that is not arbitrary is both not non-individual and semantic. sent4: the berry is anthropic. sent5: the amphotericin does sequence boringness if the mono-iodotyrosine is arbitrary. sent6: the chinoiserie is a shank if the berry is not non-anthropic. sent7: if that the chinoiserie is not non-anthropic and not semantic is not right the choragus is not semantic. sent8: the mono-iodotyrosine is arbitrary if the berry is not a kind of a shank and does sequence indistinctness. sent9: if the berry is a kind of an individual the choragus is semantic. sent10: that the choragus shanks and it is semantic is not correct. sent11: the fact that the chinoiserie is anthropic but not semantic is incorrect.
sent2 -> int1: the berry is not a intoxicant if the fact that it is not a shank and does sequence indistinctness is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the berry does not shank but it sequences indistinctness is not right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the berry is not a kind of a intoxicant.; sent7 & sent11 -> int3: that the choragus is not semantic hold.;
the amphotericin does not sequence boringness.
sent3 -> int4: if the fact that the chinoiserie is not arbitrary is true then it is a kind of an individual that is semantic.;
$hypothesis$ = the amphotericin does sequence boringness. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that it does sequence boringness. sent2: something is not a intoxicant if the fact that it is not a kind of a shank and does sequence indistinctness is not true. sent3: something that is not arbitrary is both not non-individual and semantic. sent4: the berry is anthropic. sent5: the amphotericin does sequence boringness if the mono-iodotyrosine is arbitrary. sent6: the chinoiserie is a shank if the berry is not non-anthropic. sent7: if that the chinoiserie is not non-anthropic and not semantic is not right the choragus is not semantic. sent8: the mono-iodotyrosine is arbitrary if the berry is not a kind of a shank and does sequence indistinctness. sent9: if the berry is a kind of an individual the choragus is semantic. sent10: that the choragus shanks and it is semantic is not correct. sent11: the fact that the chinoiserie is anthropic but not semantic is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the berry is not a intoxicant if the fact that it is not a shank and does sequence indistinctness is not correct.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the berry does not shank but it sequences indistinctness is not right.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the berry is not a kind of a intoxicant.; sent7 & sent11 -> int3: that the choragus is not semantic hold.; __UNKNOWN__