the roentgenogram is unimpressionable.
sent1: the Astragalus is a kind of a stokehold. sent2: if something is an eyepiece then that either it is a stokehold or it is not a diatomite or both is not true. sent3: the Astragalus is unimpressionable. sent4: the pouter is an eyepiece if the rooting is a kind of a stokehold. sent5: the pouter is unimpressionable. sent6: something is not a kind of an organic if the fact that it is an organic that is a barrow does not hold. sent7: the newcomer is an eyepiece if the covert is an eyepiece. sent8: the resuscitator is unimpressionable. sent9: the pouter is a diatomite. sent10: if the covert is a kind of a diatomite then the pouter is a stokehold. sent11: the fact that the roentgenogram is a kind of a Siamese is not false. sent12: the covert is a diatomite. sent13: that the rooting is an organic and it is a kind of a barrow is not correct. sent14: the pouter is unimpressionable if the roentgenogram is a kind of a stokehold. sent15: the covert wrestles bumblebee. sent16: the Astragalus is loopy. sent17: if that the pouter is a stokehold hold the rooting is an eyepiece. sent18: the covert is a kind of an eyepiece and/or is a kind of a pretzel if the pouter is not unimpressionable. sent19: if the rooting is not an organic it does stint roentgenogram and it poaches. sent20: if that something is a stokehold and/or it is not a kind of a diatomite is false it is a Siamese. sent21: the Astragalus is a Siamese if the rooting is an eyepiece. sent22: the fact that the roentgenogram is unimpressionable is true if the Astragalus is a kind of a Siamese. sent23: the covert is a kind of a Siamese. sent24: that the pouter is not unimpressionable is correct if it wrestles refill and is anagogic. sent25: the wreckfish is unimpressionable.
sent10 & sent12 -> int1: the pouter is a kind of a stokehold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the rooting is an eyepiece.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the Astragalus is a kind of a Siamese.; int3 & sent22 -> hypothesis;
the newcomer is a Siamese.
sent20 -> int4: the newcomer is a Siamese if that either it is a stokehold or it is not a diatomite or both is false.; sent2 -> int5: that the newcomer is a kind of a stokehold and/or it is not a diatomite is not correct if that it is an eyepiece hold.; sent6 -> int6: if that the rooting is a kind of organic thing that is a barrow is wrong it is not a kind of an organic.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the rooting is not an organic.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the rooting stints roentgenogram and it poaches.; int8 -> int9: the rooting poaches.; int9 -> int10: there is something such that it does poach.;
$hypothesis$ = the roentgenogram is unimpressionable. ; $context$ = sent1: the Astragalus is a kind of a stokehold. sent2: if something is an eyepiece then that either it is a stokehold or it is not a diatomite or both is not true. sent3: the Astragalus is unimpressionable. sent4: the pouter is an eyepiece if the rooting is a kind of a stokehold. sent5: the pouter is unimpressionable. sent6: something is not a kind of an organic if the fact that it is an organic that is a barrow does not hold. sent7: the newcomer is an eyepiece if the covert is an eyepiece. sent8: the resuscitator is unimpressionable. sent9: the pouter is a diatomite. sent10: if the covert is a kind of a diatomite then the pouter is a stokehold. sent11: the fact that the roentgenogram is a kind of a Siamese is not false. sent12: the covert is a diatomite. sent13: that the rooting is an organic and it is a kind of a barrow is not correct. sent14: the pouter is unimpressionable if the roentgenogram is a kind of a stokehold. sent15: the covert wrestles bumblebee. sent16: the Astragalus is loopy. sent17: if that the pouter is a stokehold hold the rooting is an eyepiece. sent18: the covert is a kind of an eyepiece and/or is a kind of a pretzel if the pouter is not unimpressionable. sent19: if the rooting is not an organic it does stint roentgenogram and it poaches. sent20: if that something is a stokehold and/or it is not a kind of a diatomite is false it is a Siamese. sent21: the Astragalus is a Siamese if the rooting is an eyepiece. sent22: the fact that the roentgenogram is unimpressionable is true if the Astragalus is a kind of a Siamese. sent23: the covert is a kind of a Siamese. sent24: that the pouter is not unimpressionable is correct if it wrestles refill and is anagogic. sent25: the wreckfish is unimpressionable. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 & sent12 -> int1: the pouter is a kind of a stokehold.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the rooting is an eyepiece.; int2 & sent21 -> int3: the Astragalus is a kind of a Siamese.; int3 & sent22 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__