there is something such that if it is not a cookout then that it is not rectal and narrates flourish is not correct.
sent1: if something is not a cookout then it is not rectal and narrates flourish. sent2: if the gyroscope is air-to-air then the fact that it is not a Wimbledon and it tumefies does not hold. sent3: if something is not a Beveridge that it is not ancestral and is unquestionable is not right. sent4: that the gyroscope is rectal and it narrates flourish is not correct if it is not a cookout. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a cookout is true that it is not rectal and does narrate flourish is not true. sent6: that something is a Thomson and it is a kind of a Pisum is incorrect if it is not cerous.
$hypothesis$ = there is something such that if it is not a cookout then that it is not rectal and narrates flourish is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not a cookout then it is not rectal and narrates flourish. sent2: if the gyroscope is air-to-air then the fact that it is not a Wimbledon and it tumefies does not hold. sent3: if something is not a Beveridge that it is not ancestral and is unquestionable is not right. sent4: that the gyroscope is rectal and it narrates flourish is not correct if it is not a cookout. sent5: there is something such that if that it is a cookout is true that it is not rectal and does narrate flourish is not true. sent6: that something is a Thomson and it is a kind of a Pisum is incorrect if it is not cerous. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__