the fact that the collector is a kind of intentional thing that is not a nominator is not true.
sent1: the substrate is not centripetal if that the bully is a sweatshirt but it is not centripetal does not hold. sent2: if the collector is not intentional it is inscriptive. sent3: if the collector does launch scarf the fiddleneck is not non-intentional. sent4: if the grind is a mousepad then the fact that the fiddleneck is not a sweatshirt and launches Pasternak does not hold. sent5: the fiddleneck is centripetal if the fact that it is unimportant thing that does not launch scarf does not hold. sent6: if something launches scarf that it is a kind of a sweatshirt and it is not centripetal does not hold. sent7: if the bully is pyrotechnics then it is not a kind of a mousepad and it does not launch Pasternak. sent8: if the collector is inscriptive the diner is sidearm. sent9: if that something is intentional but it is not a kind of a nominator is not true it is inscriptive. sent10: that the diner is not sidearm but it is unimportant does not hold. sent11: the grind is a mousepad and it is pyrotechnics. sent12: if the diner is not sidearm then the grind is a kind of a pretermission that is not unimportant. sent13: the diner is not pyrotechnics. sent14: something is not a kind of a sweatshirt but it does launch Pasternak if the fact that it is not unimportant hold. sent15: if the substrate is not centripetal then the fact that the fiddleneck is not inscriptive hold. sent16: something is not unimportant if the fact that it does not launch scarf and is not non-centripetal is wrong. sent17: if the diner is sidearm then that the fiddleneck does not launch scarf and is centripetal does not hold. sent18: that something is unimportant thing that does not launch scarf is wrong if that it is a sweatshirt hold. sent19: if something that is not a mousepad does not launch Pasternak then the fact that it launches scarf is not false.
sent9 -> int1: the collector is inscriptive if the fact that the fact that it is intentional and it is not a nominator hold is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the collector is intentional but it is not a nominator is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the collector is inscriptive.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the diner is sidearm.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: that the fiddleneck does not launch scarf but it is centripetal does not hold.; sent16 -> int5: the fiddleneck is not unimportant if the fact that it does not launch scarf and it is not non-centripetal is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fiddleneck is not unimportant.; sent14 -> int7: if the fiddleneck is not unimportant it is not a sweatshirt and it does launch Pasternak.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fiddleneck is not a kind of a sweatshirt and does launch Pasternak.; sent11 -> int9: the grind is a kind of a mousepad.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: that that the fiddleneck is not a sweatshirt but it does launch Pasternak is not incorrect is not true.; int8 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the grind is a kind of a pretermission but it is not unimportant is not incorrect.
sent6 -> int12: that the bully is a sweatshirt and is not centripetal is incorrect if it does launch scarf.; sent19 -> int13: the bully does launch scarf if it is not a mousepad and it does not launch Pasternak.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the collector is a kind of intentional thing that is not a nominator is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: the substrate is not centripetal if that the bully is a sweatshirt but it is not centripetal does not hold. sent2: if the collector is not intentional it is inscriptive. sent3: if the collector does launch scarf the fiddleneck is not non-intentional. sent4: if the grind is a mousepad then the fact that the fiddleneck is not a sweatshirt and launches Pasternak does not hold. sent5: the fiddleneck is centripetal if the fact that it is unimportant thing that does not launch scarf does not hold. sent6: if something launches scarf that it is a kind of a sweatshirt and it is not centripetal does not hold. sent7: if the bully is pyrotechnics then it is not a kind of a mousepad and it does not launch Pasternak. sent8: if the collector is inscriptive the diner is sidearm. sent9: if that something is intentional but it is not a kind of a nominator is not true it is inscriptive. sent10: that the diner is not sidearm but it is unimportant does not hold. sent11: the grind is a mousepad and it is pyrotechnics. sent12: if the diner is not sidearm then the grind is a kind of a pretermission that is not unimportant. sent13: the diner is not pyrotechnics. sent14: something is not a kind of a sweatshirt but it does launch Pasternak if the fact that it is not unimportant hold. sent15: if the substrate is not centripetal then the fact that the fiddleneck is not inscriptive hold. sent16: something is not unimportant if the fact that it does not launch scarf and is not non-centripetal is wrong. sent17: if the diner is sidearm then that the fiddleneck does not launch scarf and is centripetal does not hold. sent18: that something is unimportant thing that does not launch scarf is wrong if that it is a sweatshirt hold. sent19: if something that is not a mousepad does not launch Pasternak then the fact that it launches scarf is not false. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the collector is inscriptive if the fact that the fact that it is intentional and it is not a nominator hold is false.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the collector is intentional but it is not a nominator is wrong.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the collector is inscriptive.; int2 & sent8 -> int3: the diner is sidearm.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: that the fiddleneck does not launch scarf but it is centripetal does not hold.; sent16 -> int5: the fiddleneck is not unimportant if the fact that it does not launch scarf and it is not non-centripetal is incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fiddleneck is not unimportant.; sent14 -> int7: if the fiddleneck is not unimportant it is not a sweatshirt and it does launch Pasternak.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the fiddleneck is not a kind of a sweatshirt and does launch Pasternak.; sent11 -> int9: the grind is a kind of a mousepad.; sent4 & int9 -> int10: that that the fiddleneck is not a sweatshirt but it does launch Pasternak is not incorrect is not true.; int8 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__