the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a cardinal and it is a nutriment is incorrect.
sent1: the Negress is not a father-figure but it is a kind of a Harlem if the avenue is not kinesthetic. sent2: if the avenue does not slight Beowulf then the Negress is not kinesthetic and is cardinal. sent3: something acquaints Ondaatje and it is trochaic. sent4: the Negress is not kinesthetic. sent5: if the avenue does not slight Beowulf the Negress is not kinesthetic. sent6: something does not slight Beowulf if it is a father-figure. sent7: there are nasopharyngeal things. sent8: the Negress is a kind of a nutriment. sent9: the avenue is not a Harlem. sent10: the Negress is not a Harlem and is a rechauffe. sent11: if the avenue is not kinesthetic the Negress is both not a nutriment and a father-figure. sent12: something is a kind of a cardinal and it is kinesthetic. sent13: the fact that the cephalosporin is not a father-figure is not incorrect. sent14: the avenue is a kind of a father-figure if it is not a Harlem. sent15: the avenue is not a nutriment. sent16: the dragonet is a nutriment.
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the avenue is a kind of a father-figure.; sent6 -> int2: if the avenue is a kind of a father-figure the fact that it does not slight Beowulf is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the avenue does not slight Beowulf is not wrong.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Negress is both not kinesthetic and not non-cardinal.; int4 -> int5: the Negress is a kind of a cardinal.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the Negress is a cardinal and a nutriment.; int6 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it is a kind of a cardinal and it is a nutriment is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the Negress is not a father-figure but it is a kind of a Harlem if the avenue is not kinesthetic. sent2: if the avenue does not slight Beowulf then the Negress is not kinesthetic and is cardinal. sent3: something acquaints Ondaatje and it is trochaic. sent4: the Negress is not kinesthetic. sent5: if the avenue does not slight Beowulf the Negress is not kinesthetic. sent6: something does not slight Beowulf if it is a father-figure. sent7: there are nasopharyngeal things. sent8: the Negress is a kind of a nutriment. sent9: the avenue is not a Harlem. sent10: the Negress is not a Harlem and is a rechauffe. sent11: if the avenue is not kinesthetic the Negress is both not a nutriment and a father-figure. sent12: something is a kind of a cardinal and it is kinesthetic. sent13: the fact that the cephalosporin is not a father-figure is not incorrect. sent14: the avenue is a kind of a father-figure if it is not a Harlem. sent15: the avenue is not a nutriment. sent16: the dragonet is a nutriment. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent9 -> int1: the avenue is a kind of a father-figure.; sent6 -> int2: if the avenue is a kind of a father-figure the fact that it does not slight Beowulf is correct.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the avenue does not slight Beowulf is not wrong.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the Negress is both not kinesthetic and not non-cardinal.; int4 -> int5: the Negress is a kind of a cardinal.; int5 & sent8 -> int6: the Negress is a cardinal and a nutriment.; int6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__