if the murder happens the seizing does not occur but the self-destruction happens.
sent1: the outness occurs. sent2: the award prevents that the aboriginalness occurs. sent3: that the punching does not occur is triggered by that both the telluricness and the pemphigousness occurs. sent4: the browsing Ugandan occurs. sent5: the pandering does not occur. sent6: that the intramuscularness and the call-out happens yields that the browsing Maxim does not occur. sent7: that the isolation happens is caused by that the bust but not the disunifying stibnite occurs. sent8: that the Angelus happens and the murder occurs prevents that the seizing happens. sent9: that the Chilean happens and the pandering does not occur prevents that the self-destruction does not occur. sent10: that the vaporization does not occur or the biblessness happens or both is triggered by that the suturing happens. sent11: the pemphigousness occurs but the browsing acetylcholine does not occur. sent12: that the vaporization does not occur and/or that the biblessness happens yields that the Angelus occurs. sent13: not the mucking but the unstableness occurs. sent14: the Chilean occurs and the pandering does not occur. sent15: that the Chileanness occurs and/or the pandering happens is caused by the non-aboriginalness. sent16: the fact that the murder and the seizing happens does not hold if the self-destruction does not occur. sent17: the motionalness is triggered by the choking.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the murder happens.; sent9 & sent14 -> int1: the self-destruction happens.;
the electromagnetism occurs.
$hypothesis$ = if the murder happens the seizing does not occur but the self-destruction happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the outness occurs. sent2: the award prevents that the aboriginalness occurs. sent3: that the punching does not occur is triggered by that both the telluricness and the pemphigousness occurs. sent4: the browsing Ugandan occurs. sent5: the pandering does not occur. sent6: that the intramuscularness and the call-out happens yields that the browsing Maxim does not occur. sent7: that the isolation happens is caused by that the bust but not the disunifying stibnite occurs. sent8: that the Angelus happens and the murder occurs prevents that the seizing happens. sent9: that the Chilean happens and the pandering does not occur prevents that the self-destruction does not occur. sent10: that the vaporization does not occur or the biblessness happens or both is triggered by that the suturing happens. sent11: the pemphigousness occurs but the browsing acetylcholine does not occur. sent12: that the vaporization does not occur and/or that the biblessness happens yields that the Angelus occurs. sent13: not the mucking but the unstableness occurs. sent14: the Chilean occurs and the pandering does not occur. sent15: that the Chileanness occurs and/or the pandering happens is caused by the non-aboriginalness. sent16: the fact that the murder and the seizing happens does not hold if the self-destruction does not occur. sent17: the motionalness is triggered by the choking. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the murder happens.; sent9 & sent14 -> int1: the self-destruction happens.; __UNKNOWN__