the fact that there is something such that if it is a percolate that it does not compromise scholarship and it is flat does not hold does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the schoolfriend is non-flat thing that compromises schoolfriend is not true if it is a kind of a correspondence. sent2: if something percolates then that it does compromise scholarship and is a flat is not correct. sent3: the schoolfriend does not compromise scholarship and is flat if it is a percolate. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a percolate then it does not compromise scholarship and is a flat. sent5: there is something such that if it is a percolate that it does compromise scholarship and is a flat is not right. sent6: if something does percolate then it does not compromise scholarship and is flat. sent7: that something does not compromise scholarship and is a kind of a flat does not hold if it is a percolate. sent8: that the schoolfriend does not ambush Hanukkah but it does ambush areca is false if that it is a percolate is true. sent9: if the schoolfriend percolates then that it does compromise scholarship and it is a kind of a flat is not true. sent10: that something is not guilty but it is albinal is not correct if it is directional. sent11: if the schoolfriend is a flat the fact that it does not ambush mainsail and it is accordant does not hold.
sent7 -> int1: if the schoolfriend is a kind of a percolate that it does not compromise scholarship and it is flat does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is a percolate that it does not compromise scholarship and it is flat does not hold does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the schoolfriend is non-flat thing that compromises schoolfriend is not true if it is a kind of a correspondence. sent2: if something percolates then that it does compromise scholarship and is a flat is not correct. sent3: the schoolfriend does not compromise scholarship and is flat if it is a percolate. sent4: there is something such that if it is a kind of a percolate then it does not compromise scholarship and is a flat. sent5: there is something such that if it is a percolate that it does compromise scholarship and is a flat is not right. sent6: if something does percolate then it does not compromise scholarship and is flat. sent7: that something does not compromise scholarship and is a kind of a flat does not hold if it is a percolate. sent8: that the schoolfriend does not ambush Hanukkah but it does ambush areca is false if that it is a percolate is true. sent9: if the schoolfriend percolates then that it does compromise scholarship and it is a kind of a flat is not true. sent10: that something is not guilty but it is albinal is not correct if it is directional. sent11: if the schoolfriend is a flat the fact that it does not ambush mainsail and it is accordant does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: if the schoolfriend is a kind of a percolate that it does not compromise scholarship and it is flat does not hold.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__