the cutin does obey Daubentoniidae.
sent1: there is something such that that it does not obey Daubentoniidae and it does not premise slough is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that that it does premise slough and it does premise augmentation does not hold. sent3: the fact that something does not retouch Postum and is cecal is not true if the fact that it does obey parliamentarian hold. sent4: the brucine does premise slough. sent5: something does retouch Postum if it does premise slough. sent6: the cutin obeys Daubentoniidae if the protection is a fallaciousness. sent7: the protection does not premise slough if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does premise slough and premises augmentation is true does not hold. sent8: the Evangelist is not a laureate and is sabbatical. sent9: the brucine is cecal if something that is not a kind of a laureate is a sabbatical. sent10: if something that is cecal does retouch Postum it does not obey Daubentoniidae. sent11: The slough does premise brucine. sent12: the kalansuwa is a laureate. sent13: the protection does not obey parliamentarian if something is a kind of cecal thing that retouches Postum. sent14: if the fact that the protection does not obey parliamentarian is right then it is a kind of a fallaciousness.
sent8 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a laureate and it is sabbatical.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the brucine is cecal.; sent5 -> int3: the brucine does retouch Postum if the fact that it does premise slough is true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the brucine does retouch Postum.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the brucine is a kind of cecal thing that does retouch Postum.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is cecal and it retouches Postum.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the protection does not obey parliamentarian.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the protection is a fallaciousness.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the cutin does not obey Daubentoniidae.
sent10 -> int9: if the cutin is cecal and it retouches Postum it does not obey Daubentoniidae.; sent2 & sent7 -> int10: the protection does not premise slough.; int10 -> int11: there is something such that it does not premise slough.;
$hypothesis$ = the cutin does obey Daubentoniidae. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that that it does not obey Daubentoniidae and it does not premise slough is not correct. sent2: there exists something such that that it does premise slough and it does premise augmentation does not hold. sent3: the fact that something does not retouch Postum and is cecal is not true if the fact that it does obey parliamentarian hold. sent4: the brucine does premise slough. sent5: something does retouch Postum if it does premise slough. sent6: the cutin obeys Daubentoniidae if the protection is a fallaciousness. sent7: the protection does not premise slough if there exists something such that the fact that the fact that it does premise slough and premises augmentation is true does not hold. sent8: the Evangelist is not a laureate and is sabbatical. sent9: the brucine is cecal if something that is not a kind of a laureate is a sabbatical. sent10: if something that is cecal does retouch Postum it does not obey Daubentoniidae. sent11: The slough does premise brucine. sent12: the kalansuwa is a laureate. sent13: the protection does not obey parliamentarian if something is a kind of cecal thing that retouches Postum. sent14: if the fact that the protection does not obey parliamentarian is right then it is a kind of a fallaciousness. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: there exists something such that it is not a laureate and it is sabbatical.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the brucine is cecal.; sent5 -> int3: the brucine does retouch Postum if the fact that it does premise slough is true.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the brucine does retouch Postum.; int2 & int4 -> int5: the brucine is a kind of cecal thing that does retouch Postum.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is cecal and it retouches Postum.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the protection does not obey parliamentarian.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the protection is a fallaciousness.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__