the loft does not sample fart.
sent1: the foredge is a white and it does sample para. sent2: something is a kind of a Conopodium if it is a cran. sent3: if something that does ravel is a blowtorch then the Lamb is not a kind of a home. sent4: something is unprofitable if it is not a kind of a cran. sent5: something is a Lawrence if it does sample para. sent6: something that is a kind of a Lawrence does sample fart. sent7: if the abortifacient does not sample fart then it is a Lawrence or it bleeps or both. sent8: there is something such that it is a decolonization. sent9: the fact that the abortifacient samples para if the fact that the abortifacient is a Lawrence is right hold. sent10: the loft does not sample fart if that something bleeps and it samples para is not false. sent11: there exists something such that it samples para. sent12: the abortifacient is a Conopodium. sent13: there exists something such that it does bleep. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Conopodium then it samples para and bleeps. sent15: if a Conopodium is Rosicrucian then that it does not sample fart hold. sent16: that something does not bleep hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a Rosicrucian and it does bleep is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that it inflates Lorca. sent18: the fact that something that is unprofitable is Rosicrucian thing that is not a Conopodium hold. sent19: the abortifacient is a Conopodium and it bleeps. sent20: if something does not bleep that it is not a kind of a Lawrence and samples para is false. sent21: the loft is not a kind of a Conopodium if the abortifacient is a Rosicrucian but not a Conopodium. sent22: the abortifacient is a Lawrence. sent23: something is not a cran if the fact that that it is not a dirge and not outing is correct is not right.
sent9 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the abortifacient samples para hold.; sent19 -> int2: the abortifacient bleeps.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the abortifacient bleeps and it samples para.; int3 -> int4: something does bleep and it samples para.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the loft does sample fart.
sent20 -> int5: if the abortifacient does not bleep then the fact that it is not a Lawrence and it samples para does not hold.; sent16 -> int6: the abortifacient does not bleep if the fact that it is not a Rosicrucian and it bleep is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the loft does not sample fart. ; $context$ = sent1: the foredge is a white and it does sample para. sent2: something is a kind of a Conopodium if it is a cran. sent3: if something that does ravel is a blowtorch then the Lamb is not a kind of a home. sent4: something is unprofitable if it is not a kind of a cran. sent5: something is a Lawrence if it does sample para. sent6: something that is a kind of a Lawrence does sample fart. sent7: if the abortifacient does not sample fart then it is a Lawrence or it bleeps or both. sent8: there is something such that it is a decolonization. sent9: the fact that the abortifacient samples para if the fact that the abortifacient is a Lawrence is right hold. sent10: the loft does not sample fart if that something bleeps and it samples para is not false. sent11: there exists something such that it samples para. sent12: the abortifacient is a Conopodium. sent13: there exists something such that it does bleep. sent14: if something is not a kind of a Conopodium then it samples para and bleeps. sent15: if a Conopodium is Rosicrucian then that it does not sample fart hold. sent16: that something does not bleep hold if the fact that it is not a kind of a Rosicrucian and it does bleep is incorrect. sent17: there is something such that it inflates Lorca. sent18: the fact that something that is unprofitable is Rosicrucian thing that is not a Conopodium hold. sent19: the abortifacient is a Conopodium and it bleeps. sent20: if something does not bleep that it is not a kind of a Lawrence and samples para is false. sent21: the loft is not a kind of a Conopodium if the abortifacient is a Rosicrucian but not a Conopodium. sent22: the abortifacient is a Lawrence. sent23: something is not a cran if the fact that that it is not a dirge and not outing is correct is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent22 -> int1: the fact that the abortifacient samples para hold.; sent19 -> int2: the abortifacient bleeps.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the abortifacient bleeps and it samples para.; int3 -> int4: something does bleep and it samples para.; int4 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__