the snowbank is not actinomycetal.
sent1: the roaster is not distal. sent2: a non-cecal thing is an alveolar and does roof recipe. sent3: the roaster is not a salpingectomy if that the snowbank is non-actinomycetal a aerator does not hold. sent4: if something is not acapnic and/or it is modest it is not cecal. sent5: the clavier does guess and it is a Littre if the laudanum is not gutless. sent6: The ailanthus does not efface roaster. sent7: that something effaces ailanthus but it is not distal does not hold if it is retinal. sent8: everything is not acapnic or modest or both. sent9: if something is distal then it is actinomycetal. sent10: the laudanum is not gutless. sent11: the roaster does not efface ailanthus. sent12: there is something such that it is not distal and it effaces ailanthus. sent13: if the fact that something guesses hold then the fact that the snowbank is not actinomycetal but a aerator does not hold. sent14: the snowbank is not actinomycetal if a non-distal thing does not efface ailanthus. sent15: if there exists something such that that it effaces ailanthus and it is not distal does not hold then the roaster is not tights. sent16: there exists something such that it is not distal. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of distal thing that does not efface ailanthus. sent18: the originator is retinal if the thrift does roof recipe.
sent1 & sent11 -> int1: the roaster is not distal and does not efface ailanthus.; int1 -> int2: something is not distal and it does not efface ailanthus.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis;
there exists something such that that it is not a salpingectomy and is non-tights is right.
sent2 -> int3: the hollandaise is a kind of an alveolar and it roofs recipe if it is not cecal.; sent8 -> int4: the hauler is not acapnic or it is modest or both.; sent4 -> int5: if the hauler is non-acapnic and/or not immodest it is not cecal.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the hauler is not cecal is not false.; int6 -> int7: everything is not cecal.; int7 -> int8: the hollandaise is not cecal.; int3 & int8 -> int9: the hollandaise is an alveolar and it roofs recipe.; int9 -> int10: everything is an alveolar and it roofs recipe.; int10 -> int11: the thrift is alveolar and roofs recipe.; int11 -> int12: the thrift roofs recipe.; sent18 & int12 -> int13: the originator is retinal.; sent7 -> int14: if the originator is retinal that it does efface ailanthus and it is not distal is not true.; int13 & int14 -> int15: the fact that the originator effaces ailanthus and is not distal is not true.; int15 -> int16: there is something such that the fact that it does efface ailanthus and it is not distal is not correct.; sent15 & int16 -> int17: the roaster is not tights.; sent10 & sent5 -> int18: the clavier guesses and is a Littre.; int18 -> int19: the clavier is a guess.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it is a guess.; int20 & sent13 -> int21: that the snowbank is both not actinomycetal and a aerator is wrong.; sent3 & int21 -> int22: that the roaster is not a kind of a salpingectomy is not false.; int17 & int22 -> int23: the roaster is not a salpingectomy and it is not tights.; int23 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the snowbank is not actinomycetal. ; $context$ = sent1: the roaster is not distal. sent2: a non-cecal thing is an alveolar and does roof recipe. sent3: the roaster is not a salpingectomy if that the snowbank is non-actinomycetal a aerator does not hold. sent4: if something is not acapnic and/or it is modest it is not cecal. sent5: the clavier does guess and it is a Littre if the laudanum is not gutless. sent6: The ailanthus does not efface roaster. sent7: that something effaces ailanthus but it is not distal does not hold if it is retinal. sent8: everything is not acapnic or modest or both. sent9: if something is distal then it is actinomycetal. sent10: the laudanum is not gutless. sent11: the roaster does not efface ailanthus. sent12: there is something such that it is not distal and it effaces ailanthus. sent13: if the fact that something guesses hold then the fact that the snowbank is not actinomycetal but a aerator does not hold. sent14: the snowbank is not actinomycetal if a non-distal thing does not efface ailanthus. sent15: if there exists something such that that it effaces ailanthus and it is not distal does not hold then the roaster is not tights. sent16: there exists something such that it is not distal. sent17: there exists something such that it is a kind of distal thing that does not efface ailanthus. sent18: the originator is retinal if the thrift does roof recipe. ; $proof$ = 
sent1 & sent11 -> int1: the roaster is not distal and does not efface ailanthus.; int1 -> int2: something is not distal and it does not efface ailanthus.; int2 & sent14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__