the illuminant does not rap silage.
sent1: if the plush does exsiccate dehiscence but it is not a surveillance then the fact that the company is not a Riksmal is right. sent2: the wollastonite does churn thyronine and it is a Riksmal if the fact that the company is not a Riksmal is correct. sent3: if the silage is not a Riksmal it is not effervescent. sent4: the silage is effervescent or it churns LEM or both. sent5: that the wollastonite is not a kind of a Riksmal does not hold. sent6: if the plush does not exsiccate dehiscence the silage exsiccate dehiscence. sent7: that the silage does not churn thyronine if the silage is not effervescent hold. sent8: if the fact that the wollastonite does churn thyronine is not false the illuminant does rap silage. sent9: the company is not a kind of a Riksmal if the plush exsiccates dehiscence and it is a kind of a surveillance. sent10: the wollastonite raps silage and it is a Riksmal. sent11: if the plush is not a homeotherm then it does not exsiccate dehiscence. sent12: something is not a homeotherm if that it is not a surveillance and it is not a polyphosphate does not hold. sent13: if something is effervescent and/or churns LEM the aldose is a homeotherm. sent14: the wollastonite is a Riksmal if the company is not a Riksmal. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a Riksmal or a homeotherm or both then the company raps silage. sent16: the wollastonite is a Riksmal and does not exsiccate dehiscence. sent17: if something is not a kind of a polyphosphate it exsiccates dehiscence and is not a surveillance. sent18: the company does not churn thyronine. sent19: the plush is not a kind of a polyphosphate if the aldose is a homeotherm. sent20: the wollastonite raps silage.
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that it is effervescent and/or it does churn LEM.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the aldose is a homeotherm.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the plush is not a kind of a polyphosphate.; sent17 -> int4: if the plush is not a polyphosphate it exsiccates dehiscence and is not a surveillance.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the plush does exsiccate dehiscence but it is not a surveillance.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the company is not a kind of a Riksmal is not wrong.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the wollastonite churns thyronine and it is a kind of a Riksmal.; int7 -> int8: the wollastonite does churn thyronine.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the illuminant does not rap silage.
sent12 -> int9: the aldose is not a homeotherm if the fact that it is not a surveillance and it is not a polyphosphate does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the illuminant does not rap silage. ; $context$ = sent1: if the plush does exsiccate dehiscence but it is not a surveillance then the fact that the company is not a Riksmal is right. sent2: the wollastonite does churn thyronine and it is a Riksmal if the fact that the company is not a Riksmal is correct. sent3: if the silage is not a Riksmal it is not effervescent. sent4: the silage is effervescent or it churns LEM or both. sent5: that the wollastonite is not a kind of a Riksmal does not hold. sent6: if the plush does not exsiccate dehiscence the silage exsiccate dehiscence. sent7: that the silage does not churn thyronine if the silage is not effervescent hold. sent8: if the fact that the wollastonite does churn thyronine is not false the illuminant does rap silage. sent9: the company is not a kind of a Riksmal if the plush exsiccates dehiscence and it is a kind of a surveillance. sent10: the wollastonite raps silage and it is a Riksmal. sent11: if the plush is not a homeotherm then it does not exsiccate dehiscence. sent12: something is not a homeotherm if that it is not a surveillance and it is not a polyphosphate does not hold. sent13: if something is effervescent and/or churns LEM the aldose is a homeotherm. sent14: the wollastonite is a Riksmal if the company is not a Riksmal. sent15: if there exists something such that it is a Riksmal or a homeotherm or both then the company raps silage. sent16: the wollastonite is a Riksmal and does not exsiccate dehiscence. sent17: if something is not a kind of a polyphosphate it exsiccates dehiscence and is not a surveillance. sent18: the company does not churn thyronine. sent19: the plush is not a kind of a polyphosphate if the aldose is a homeotherm. sent20: the wollastonite raps silage. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> int1: there exists something such that it is effervescent and/or it does churn LEM.; int1 & sent13 -> int2: the aldose is a homeotherm.; int2 & sent19 -> int3: the plush is not a kind of a polyphosphate.; sent17 -> int4: if the plush is not a polyphosphate it exsiccates dehiscence and is not a surveillance.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the plush does exsiccate dehiscence but it is not a surveillance.; int5 & sent1 -> int6: the fact that the company is not a kind of a Riksmal is not wrong.; int6 & sent2 -> int7: the wollastonite churns thyronine and it is a kind of a Riksmal.; int7 -> int8: the wollastonite does churn thyronine.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__