the cupel is not a hydroxyproline.
sent1: if the phenol is not incommensurate or not frictional or both then it is not frictional. sent2: the father-in-law pillories if the fact that it is a kind of non-junior thing that does claw defecation does not hold. sent3: if the phenol is both a Lendl and not acarpelous it claps verticality. sent4: if the fact that the pinguecula is a kind of dizygotic thing that is not up is false the samarskite is dizygotic. sent5: the fact that that the pinguecula is dizygotic but it is non-up is not wrong is not true if the phenol does clap verticality. sent6: if something is not frictional it is a Lendl and it is not acarpelous. sent7: that the father-in-law does not claw Jotun and is junior does not hold. sent8: if that the father-in-law is not a junior hold the throw is a hydroxyproline or it does not claw Jotun or both. sent9: if the father-in-law is a kind of a junior then that the throw is junior thing that is a pillory is false. sent10: the fact that the father-in-law is not a kind of a junior but it does claw defecation does not hold if the throw is junior. sent11: if the samarskite is not dizygotic then that the blowing is a pillory but it does not claw defecation does not hold. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of a pillory and does not claw defecation does not hold it claw defecation. sent13: if the father-in-law is a kind of a pillory then that the cupel is a kind of a hydroxyproline is correct. sent14: the throw is not non-junior and it does claw Jotun.
sent14 -> int1: that the throw is a junior is not wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the father-in-law is not a junior but it claws defecation is not true.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the father-in-law does pillory.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the cupel is not a kind of a hydroxyproline.
sent12 -> int4: if the fact that the blowing pillories but it does not claw defecation is false it does claw defecation.; sent6 -> int5: if the phenol is not frictional it is a Lendl and it is non-acarpelous.;
$hypothesis$ = the cupel is not a hydroxyproline. ; $context$ = sent1: if the phenol is not incommensurate or not frictional or both then it is not frictional. sent2: the father-in-law pillories if the fact that it is a kind of non-junior thing that does claw defecation does not hold. sent3: if the phenol is both a Lendl and not acarpelous it claps verticality. sent4: if the fact that the pinguecula is a kind of dizygotic thing that is not up is false the samarskite is dizygotic. sent5: the fact that that the pinguecula is dizygotic but it is non-up is not wrong is not true if the phenol does clap verticality. sent6: if something is not frictional it is a Lendl and it is not acarpelous. sent7: that the father-in-law does not claw Jotun and is junior does not hold. sent8: if that the father-in-law is not a junior hold the throw is a hydroxyproline or it does not claw Jotun or both. sent9: if the father-in-law is a kind of a junior then that the throw is junior thing that is a pillory is false. sent10: the fact that the father-in-law is not a kind of a junior but it does claw defecation does not hold if the throw is junior. sent11: if the samarskite is not dizygotic then that the blowing is a pillory but it does not claw defecation does not hold. sent12: if the fact that something is a kind of a pillory and does not claw defecation does not hold it claw defecation. sent13: if the father-in-law is a kind of a pillory then that the cupel is a kind of a hydroxyproline is correct. sent14: the throw is not non-junior and it does claw Jotun. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: that the throw is a junior is not wrong.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the fact that the father-in-law is not a junior but it claws defecation is not true.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the father-in-law does pillory.; int3 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__