the Burnside is not a anaspid.
sent1: the fact that the Zionist does sediment or is falconine or both is not correct if the hideaway does not equilibrate. sent2: the icaco is not falconine. sent3: if there exists something such that it does not equilibrate then the Burnside is a anaspid. sent4: the fact that something is not non-acoustics and it contemplates caladium hold if it is not a amarelle. sent5: the Zionist is lossy. sent6: the sulfate is not a demonstrative. sent7: the eudiometer is not a amarelle if there exists something such that that it is not a bid and not a murmur is not true. sent8: the Burnside is a kind of an onion. sent9: the fact that the scarf is not a bid and not a murmur is not true. sent10: something is non-falconine thing that is a sediment. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is endothelial and is erecting is not correct. sent12: the hideaway is not falconine if there is something such that that it is not endothelial and it is erecting is not true. sent13: if something is not a sediment it does not equilibrate. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a sediment that is a kind of a anaspid is false. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the Zionist is a kind of a sediment and/or it is falconine is wrong is right then the Burnside is not a anaspid. sent16: the fact that something is endothelial but it is not erecting does not hold if it contemplates caladium. sent17: if the Burnside is falconine the hideaway is a anaspid. sent18: something is not a mutability and is energetic. sent19: if the fact that the Zionist is a sediment is not wrong then the hideaway is falconine. sent20: there is something such that that it is not endothelial and it is erecting does not hold. sent21: the Burnside is falconine.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Zionist is a sediment.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the hideaway is falconine.; sent20 & sent12 -> int2: the hideaway is not falconine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Zionist is not a sediment.; sent13 -> int5: the fact that if the Zionist is not the sediment the Zionist does not equilibrate is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Zionist does not equilibrate.; int6 -> int7: something does not equilibrate.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis;
the Burnside is not a anaspid.
sent16 -> int8: the fact that the eudiometer is a kind of endothelial thing that is not erecting is not right if it contemplates caladium.; sent4 -> int9: if the eudiometer is not a kind of a amarelle then it is acoustics and contemplates caladium.; sent9 -> int10: there is something such that the fact that it is not a bid and not a murmur is false.; int10 & sent7 -> int11: that the eudiometer is not a amarelle is not wrong.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the eudiometer is an acoustics and does contemplate caladium.; int12 -> int13: the eudiometer contemplates caladium.; int8 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the eudiometer is endothelial but it is not erecting is not right.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is endothelial but not erecting is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the Burnside is not a anaspid. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the Zionist does sediment or is falconine or both is not correct if the hideaway does not equilibrate. sent2: the icaco is not falconine. sent3: if there exists something such that it does not equilibrate then the Burnside is a anaspid. sent4: the fact that something is not non-acoustics and it contemplates caladium hold if it is not a amarelle. sent5: the Zionist is lossy. sent6: the sulfate is not a demonstrative. sent7: the eudiometer is not a amarelle if there exists something such that that it is not a bid and not a murmur is not true. sent8: the Burnside is a kind of an onion. sent9: the fact that the scarf is not a bid and not a murmur is not true. sent10: something is non-falconine thing that is a sediment. sent11: there is something such that the fact that it is endothelial and is erecting is not correct. sent12: the hideaway is not falconine if there is something such that that it is not endothelial and it is erecting is not true. sent13: if something is not a sediment it does not equilibrate. sent14: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a sediment that is a kind of a anaspid is false. sent15: if the fact that the fact that the Zionist is a kind of a sediment and/or it is falconine is wrong is right then the Burnside is not a anaspid. sent16: the fact that something is endothelial but it is not erecting does not hold if it contemplates caladium. sent17: if the Burnside is falconine the hideaway is a anaspid. sent18: something is not a mutability and is energetic. sent19: if the fact that the Zionist is a sediment is not wrong then the hideaway is falconine. sent20: there is something such that that it is not endothelial and it is erecting does not hold. sent21: the Burnside is falconine. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Zionist is a sediment.; sent19 & assump1 -> int1: the hideaway is falconine.; sent20 & sent12 -> int2: the hideaway is not falconine.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the Zionist is not a sediment.; sent13 -> int5: the fact that if the Zionist is not the sediment the Zionist does not equilibrate is not incorrect.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the Zionist does not equilibrate.; int6 -> int7: something does not equilibrate.; int7 & sent3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__