the fact that the hell is non-Linnaean thing that is not a kind of a Dorian is incorrect.
sent1: the chalk is .45-caliber and does excise callowness. sent2: if the faddist is not a Dorian then the fact that the hell is both not Linnaean and not Dorian is not correct. sent3: the fact that the hell is not a Dorian and is Linnaean is wrong if the faddist is not Linnaean. sent4: the fact that the fact that the faddist does not excise Pipistrellus and fibs is not true is correct. sent5: the faddist is not scopal. sent6: the faddist dices and excises callowness. sent7: the fact that the faddist is non-foreign and perplexes barbet is false. sent8: the faddist does excise callowness but it does not excise Pipistrellus if it is a kind of a UHF. sent9: that the hell does not excise callowness and it is not a Swedish is incorrect. sent10: the faddist does not excise callowness if it is Linnaean and it is a Dorian. sent11: if the faddist does excise callowness and it excises Pipistrellus then it is not a Dorian. sent12: the barbet is Linnaean. sent13: if the hell is not Linnaean then that that the faddist is not a Dorian but it is Linnaean is not incorrect does not hold. sent14: if the hell dices and it is Dorian then it does not excise Pipistrellus. sent15: the faddist excises Pipistrellus. sent16: that the fact that the hell is a kind of a Dorian but it does not dice hold does not hold if the faddist does not dice. sent17: if the hell does excise Pipistrellus and it is Linnaean then it is not a Dorian. sent18: The Pipistrellus excises faddist. sent19: the fact that the faddist is a kind of non-Dorian thing that dices does not hold if the fact that the hell dices is not correct. sent20: if the faddist does not excise callowness that the hell excises Pipistrellus and does not excise callowness is not right. sent21: the fact that the hell is both Linnaean and not a Dorian is not correct. sent22: if the faddist is not a kind of a Dorian that that the hell does not excise callowness and is not a Dorian is not true is correct. sent23: that the puffing is not a kind of a Phalacrocoracidae and it does not excise callowness is false.
sent6 -> int1: the faddist excises callowness.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the faddist excises callowness and does excise Pipistrellus.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the faddist is not a Dorian is not false.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis;
the hell is both not Linnaean and not Dorian.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the hell is non-Linnaean thing that is not a kind of a Dorian is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the chalk is .45-caliber and does excise callowness. sent2: if the faddist is not a Dorian then the fact that the hell is both not Linnaean and not Dorian is not correct. sent3: the fact that the hell is not a Dorian and is Linnaean is wrong if the faddist is not Linnaean. sent4: the fact that the fact that the faddist does not excise Pipistrellus and fibs is not true is correct. sent5: the faddist is not scopal. sent6: the faddist dices and excises callowness. sent7: the fact that the faddist is non-foreign and perplexes barbet is false. sent8: the faddist does excise callowness but it does not excise Pipistrellus if it is a kind of a UHF. sent9: that the hell does not excise callowness and it is not a Swedish is incorrect. sent10: the faddist does not excise callowness if it is Linnaean and it is a Dorian. sent11: if the faddist does excise callowness and it excises Pipistrellus then it is not a Dorian. sent12: the barbet is Linnaean. sent13: if the hell is not Linnaean then that that the faddist is not a Dorian but it is Linnaean is not incorrect does not hold. sent14: if the hell dices and it is Dorian then it does not excise Pipistrellus. sent15: the faddist excises Pipistrellus. sent16: that the fact that the hell is a kind of a Dorian but it does not dice hold does not hold if the faddist does not dice. sent17: if the hell does excise Pipistrellus and it is Linnaean then it is not a Dorian. sent18: The Pipistrellus excises faddist. sent19: the fact that the faddist is a kind of non-Dorian thing that dices does not hold if the fact that the hell dices is not correct. sent20: if the faddist does not excise callowness that the hell excises Pipistrellus and does not excise callowness is not right. sent21: the fact that the hell is both Linnaean and not a Dorian is not correct. sent22: if the faddist is not a kind of a Dorian that that the hell does not excise callowness and is not a Dorian is not true is correct. sent23: that the puffing is not a kind of a Phalacrocoracidae and it does not excise callowness is false. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> int1: the faddist excises callowness.; int1 & sent15 -> int2: the faddist excises callowness and does excise Pipistrellus.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: the fact that the faddist is not a Dorian is not false.; int3 & sent2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__