the fact that the umbellateness occurs or the billowing Iraq does not occur or both is incorrect.
sent1: the fact that both the non-telegraphicness and the greening occurs is not true if the wiglessness occurs. sent2: the impermissibleness does not occur. sent3: that the outgeneraling Popper does not occur is correct. sent4: that the billowing padrone does not occur is true. sent5: the suppurativeness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the telegraphicness does not occur and the green occurs is not true the green does not occur. sent7: if the hand-heldness occurs the fact that both the isomorphousness and the billowing LTTE happens does not hold. sent8: the binding happens if that the apery but not the billowing explicandum happens is wrong. sent9: the wiglessness occurs. sent10: the hand-heldness occurs. sent11: that both the adding and the outgeneraling relations happens does not hold. sent12: if the hand-heldness happens the fact that not the isomorphousness but the billowing LTTE occurs does not hold. sent13: if the amperage does not occur the branched occurs. sent14: the fact that the outgeneraling heteronym but not the chromatinicness happens is not correct. sent15: the binding happens if the billowing explicandum occurs. sent16: that the piraticalness happens is prevented by that the scotomatousness does not occur and the green does not occur. sent17: if that both the non-isomorphousness and the billowing LTTE occurs is wrong the proposal happens. sent18: the billowing misoneism is brought about by the omega. sent19: the billowing Iraq happens. sent20: the proposal or the non-scotomatousness or both occurs if the green happens. sent21: that that the apery occurs but the billowing explicandum does not occur is wrong is not false if the billowing padrone does not occur. sent22: the fact that the umbellateness happens and/or the billowing Iraq does not occur is incorrect if that the piraticalness does not occur is right.
sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the apery but not the billowing explicandum happens is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the binding happens is not false.; sent12 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that both the non-isomorphousness and the billowing LTTE happens is not true.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the proposal occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the binding and the proposal happens.; sent1 & sent9 -> int6: that that not the telegraphicness but the greenness occurs is right is incorrect.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the greenness does not occur.;
either the umbellateness happens or the billowing Iraq does not occur or both.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the umbellateness occurs or the billowing Iraq does not occur or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that both the non-telegraphicness and the greening occurs is not true if the wiglessness occurs. sent2: the impermissibleness does not occur. sent3: that the outgeneraling Popper does not occur is correct. sent4: that the billowing padrone does not occur is true. sent5: the suppurativeness occurs. sent6: if the fact that the telegraphicness does not occur and the green occurs is not true the green does not occur. sent7: if the hand-heldness occurs the fact that both the isomorphousness and the billowing LTTE happens does not hold. sent8: the binding happens if that the apery but not the billowing explicandum happens is wrong. sent9: the wiglessness occurs. sent10: the hand-heldness occurs. sent11: that both the adding and the outgeneraling relations happens does not hold. sent12: if the hand-heldness happens the fact that not the isomorphousness but the billowing LTTE occurs does not hold. sent13: if the amperage does not occur the branched occurs. sent14: the fact that the outgeneraling heteronym but not the chromatinicness happens is not correct. sent15: the binding happens if the billowing explicandum occurs. sent16: that the piraticalness happens is prevented by that the scotomatousness does not occur and the green does not occur. sent17: if that both the non-isomorphousness and the billowing LTTE occurs is wrong the proposal happens. sent18: the billowing misoneism is brought about by the omega. sent19: the billowing Iraq happens. sent20: the proposal or the non-scotomatousness or both occurs if the green happens. sent21: that that the apery occurs but the billowing explicandum does not occur is wrong is not false if the billowing padrone does not occur. sent22: the fact that the umbellateness happens and/or the billowing Iraq does not occur is incorrect if that the piraticalness does not occur is right. ; $proof$ = 
sent21 & sent4 -> int1: the fact that the apery but not the billowing explicandum happens is wrong.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the fact that the binding happens is not false.; sent12 & sent10 -> int3: the fact that both the non-isomorphousness and the billowing LTTE happens is not true.; sent17 & int3 -> int4: the proposal occurs.; int2 & int4 -> int5: both the binding and the proposal happens.; sent1 & sent9 -> int6: that that not the telegraphicness but the greenness occurs is right is incorrect.; sent6 & int6 -> int7: the greenness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__