that the non-mesonicness or the venipuncture or both happens does not hold.
sent1: that the neriticness does not occur is triggered by that the regulation occurs and the confession occurs. sent2: if the siding spotlight does not occur then the siding Sydenham occurs. sent3: the venipuncture does not occur. sent4: the apocrineness happens. sent5: the fact that the non-mesonicness and/or the venipuncture occurs does not hold if that the confession does not occur is not wrong. sent6: if that the non-mesonicness and the siding Sydenham happens is not correct then the venipuncture does not occur. sent7: that the oystering does not occur or the radical happens or both is wrong. sent8: the apocrineness and the regulation occurs. sent9: both the filming and the refining wristlet occurs. sent10: the Pacific happens and the siding testosterone happens. sent11: the alluvialness and the siding methylenedioxymethamphetamine happens. sent12: the minstreling does not occur. sent13: if the siding spotlight does not occur then the siding Sydenham occurs and the neriticness happens.
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the regulation occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the confession occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the regulation happens and the confession occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the neriticness does not occur.;
the vibration does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the non-mesonicness or the venipuncture or both happens does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the neriticness does not occur is triggered by that the regulation occurs and the confession occurs. sent2: if the siding spotlight does not occur then the siding Sydenham occurs. sent3: the venipuncture does not occur. sent4: the apocrineness happens. sent5: the fact that the non-mesonicness and/or the venipuncture occurs does not hold if that the confession does not occur is not wrong. sent6: if that the non-mesonicness and the siding Sydenham happens is not correct then the venipuncture does not occur. sent7: that the oystering does not occur or the radical happens or both is wrong. sent8: the apocrineness and the regulation occurs. sent9: both the filming and the refining wristlet occurs. sent10: the Pacific happens and the siding testosterone happens. sent11: the alluvialness and the siding methylenedioxymethamphetamine happens. sent12: the minstreling does not occur. sent13: if the siding spotlight does not occur then the siding Sydenham occurs and the neriticness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> int1: the fact that the regulation occurs is true.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the confession occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the regulation happens and the confession occurs.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the neriticness does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__