the percolator is not electromotive.
sent1: the Punjabi does not articulate bisexual. sent2: the Punjabi does not simulate if it is not a heliosphere. sent3: the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal and it does not simulate if the bisexual is not a Aristarchus. sent4: the percolator does not toilet-train nonmetal if that the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal hold. sent5: the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal if it does not simulate and is curatorial. sent6: the Punjabi is not a Sikorsky. sent7: if the Punjabi does simulate and is curatorial the fact that it does not toilet-train nonmetal is right. sent8: the percolator is not a kind of a heliosphere if the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal and it does not simulate. sent9: something does simulate but it does not toilet-train nonmetal if it is a Aristarchus. sent10: there is something such that it is not statistical and it is not a republican. sent11: the percolator is electromotive thing that does not toilet-train nonmetal if the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal. sent12: the fact that the Punjabi does not simulate is true. sent13: if the Punjabi is a kind of non-electromotive thing that does toilet-train nonmetal that it does not tramp is not incorrect. sent14: the bisexual is a Aristarchus. sent15: that either the Punjabi does articulate bisexual or it is a kind of a tramp or both is incorrect. sent16: the bisexual is not a Aristarchus if the fact that the jimdandy is a pungency and it syllogizes homeopathy is incorrect. sent17: the percolator does not toilet-train nonmetal. sent18: that the Punjabi is not a heliosphere is not false if that it does articulate bisexual and/or is a tramp is false. sent19: the Punjabi does not articulate bisexual if the fact that either it is a kind of a heliosphere or it is electromotive or both does not hold. sent20: that the Punjabi does not simulate but it is curatorial hold if it is not a heliosphere. sent21: the fact that something is curatorial and is not a heliosphere is incorrect if that it simulates is not false. sent22: the percolator is not a heliosphere and does articulate rest. sent23: that something is electromotive and is not a heliosphere does not hold if it is not curatorial. sent24: if the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal then it does not simulate and it is electromotive. sent25: the fact that the percolator does not articulate casement is not wrong.
sent18 & sent15 -> int1: the Punjabi is not a heliosphere.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the Punjabi does not simulate but it is curatorial.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal is not wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the percolator is electromotive and does not toilet-train nonmetal.; int4 -> hypothesis;
the percolator is not electromotive.
sent23 -> int5: that the Punjabi is electromotive thing that is not a heliosphere is not right if it is not curatorial.; sent9 -> int6: if that the bisexual is a kind of a Aristarchus is true then it does simulate and does not toilet-train nonmetal.; int6 & sent14 -> int7: the bisexual does simulate but it does not toilet-train nonmetal.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it simulates and does not toilet-train nonmetal.;
$hypothesis$ = the percolator is not electromotive. ; $context$ = sent1: the Punjabi does not articulate bisexual. sent2: the Punjabi does not simulate if it is not a heliosphere. sent3: the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal and it does not simulate if the bisexual is not a Aristarchus. sent4: the percolator does not toilet-train nonmetal if that the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal hold. sent5: the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal if it does not simulate and is curatorial. sent6: the Punjabi is not a Sikorsky. sent7: if the Punjabi does simulate and is curatorial the fact that it does not toilet-train nonmetal is right. sent8: the percolator is not a kind of a heliosphere if the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal and it does not simulate. sent9: something does simulate but it does not toilet-train nonmetal if it is a Aristarchus. sent10: there is something such that it is not statistical and it is not a republican. sent11: the percolator is electromotive thing that does not toilet-train nonmetal if the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal. sent12: the fact that the Punjabi does not simulate is true. sent13: if the Punjabi is a kind of non-electromotive thing that does toilet-train nonmetal that it does not tramp is not incorrect. sent14: the bisexual is a Aristarchus. sent15: that either the Punjabi does articulate bisexual or it is a kind of a tramp or both is incorrect. sent16: the bisexual is not a Aristarchus if the fact that the jimdandy is a pungency and it syllogizes homeopathy is incorrect. sent17: the percolator does not toilet-train nonmetal. sent18: that the Punjabi is not a heliosphere is not false if that it does articulate bisexual and/or is a tramp is false. sent19: the Punjabi does not articulate bisexual if the fact that either it is a kind of a heliosphere or it is electromotive or both does not hold. sent20: that the Punjabi does not simulate but it is curatorial hold if it is not a heliosphere. sent21: the fact that something is curatorial and is not a heliosphere is incorrect if that it simulates is not false. sent22: the percolator is not a heliosphere and does articulate rest. sent23: that something is electromotive and is not a heliosphere does not hold if it is not curatorial. sent24: if the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal then it does not simulate and it is electromotive. sent25: the fact that the percolator does not articulate casement is not wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent18 & sent15 -> int1: the Punjabi is not a heliosphere.; int1 & sent20 -> int2: the Punjabi does not simulate but it is curatorial.; int2 & sent5 -> int3: that the Punjabi does not toilet-train nonmetal is not wrong.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the percolator is electromotive and does not toilet-train nonmetal.; int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__