the trick is both not a connection and not a pad.
sent1: the cocuswood is aldermanic. sent2: the sail does not expire reassertion and it is not residential. sent3: if that the terror is not noncollapsible is correct then the fact that the sail does not expire reassertion and is not residential does not hold. sent4: that the sail is not a sulk and it is not noncollapsible is wrong if the terror is not residential. sent5: something is not a connection and it is not a pad if it is not noncollapsible. sent6: if the terror is aldermanic then it is a sulk. sent7: if the terror is not collapsible it is aldermanic. sent8: that the trick is not a kind of a connection but it pads is not right. sent9: the fact that the trick is not a connection and it does not pad is not correct if the fact that the terror sulks is true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the terror is not noncollapsible.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sail does not expire reassertion and is not residential does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the terror is noncollapsible.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the terror is aldermanic.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the terror sulks is not incorrect.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the trick is not a connection and not a pad.
sent5 -> int6: the trick is not a connection and is not a pad if it is not noncollapsible.;
$hypothesis$ = the trick is both not a connection and not a pad. ; $context$ = sent1: the cocuswood is aldermanic. sent2: the sail does not expire reassertion and it is not residential. sent3: if that the terror is not noncollapsible is correct then the fact that the sail does not expire reassertion and is not residential does not hold. sent4: that the sail is not a sulk and it is not noncollapsible is wrong if the terror is not residential. sent5: something is not a connection and it is not a pad if it is not noncollapsible. sent6: if the terror is aldermanic then it is a sulk. sent7: if the terror is not collapsible it is aldermanic. sent8: that the trick is not a kind of a connection but it pads is not right. sent9: the fact that the trick is not a connection and it does not pad is not correct if the fact that the terror sulks is true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the terror is not noncollapsible.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the sail does not expire reassertion and is not residential does not hold.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the terror is noncollapsible.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the terror is aldermanic.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the fact that the terror sulks is not incorrect.; int5 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__