the love is not a homonym and/or it does not snow earphone.
sent1: the love is a kind of a homonym or it does not snow earphone or both. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it hallucinates and it does encircle unassertiveness is not right. sent3: if the love does snow earphone it subtracts aqualung. sent4: if the love subtracts aqualung then the Kui does subtract genus. sent5: if there is something such that it either is not beautiful or does snow earphone or both the pen snow earphone. sent6: if the fact that something is non-beautiful but it subtracts aqualung is incorrect then it does not subtracts aqualung. sent7: the love subtracts genus if it does snow earphone. sent8: the love is beautiful if the pen does subtract aqualung. sent9: the stifle is not a kind of a mixture and/or it snows ping. sent10: there exists something such that it is not beautiful and/or it snows earphone. sent11: the physique is proactive. sent12: the love is non-beautiful or it is not a homonym or both. sent13: the fact that everything is not beautiful hold. sent14: if that the Kui subtracts genus is true then the fact that the pen is beautiful is not incorrect. sent15: the respirator does not subtract aqualung. sent16: if the fact that the love subtracts genus and it is aerobics is not true then it does not subtracts genus. sent17: the fact that the pen does adjust is correct. sent18: if the love is a homonym the cruller is a kind of a homonym. sent19: if the love is not a wirework that it subtracts genus and is not non-aerobics is not true. sent20: either the love is not a kind of a homonym or it does snow earphone or both. sent21: if the fact that the Kui does not subtract aqualung hold then the fact that the love either is not a homonym or does not snow earphone or both is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the love snows earphone.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the love subtracts aqualung.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Kui does subtract genus.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the pen is beautiful.; sent13 -> int4: the pen is not beautiful.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the love does not snow earphone is not wrong.; int6 -> hypothesis;
the fact that that either the love is not a homonym or it does not snow earphone or both is wrong is correct.
sent6 -> int7: if that the love is not beautiful but it subtracts aqualung is not right it does not subtracts aqualung.;
$hypothesis$ = the love is not a homonym and/or it does not snow earphone. ; $context$ = sent1: the love is a kind of a homonym or it does not snow earphone or both. sent2: there exists something such that the fact that it hallucinates and it does encircle unassertiveness is not right. sent3: if the love does snow earphone it subtracts aqualung. sent4: if the love subtracts aqualung then the Kui does subtract genus. sent5: if there is something such that it either is not beautiful or does snow earphone or both the pen snow earphone. sent6: if the fact that something is non-beautiful but it subtracts aqualung is incorrect then it does not subtracts aqualung. sent7: the love subtracts genus if it does snow earphone. sent8: the love is beautiful if the pen does subtract aqualung. sent9: the stifle is not a kind of a mixture and/or it snows ping. sent10: there exists something such that it is not beautiful and/or it snows earphone. sent11: the physique is proactive. sent12: the love is non-beautiful or it is not a homonym or both. sent13: the fact that everything is not beautiful hold. sent14: if that the Kui subtracts genus is true then the fact that the pen is beautiful is not incorrect. sent15: the respirator does not subtract aqualung. sent16: if the fact that the love subtracts genus and it is aerobics is not true then it does not subtracts genus. sent17: the fact that the pen does adjust is correct. sent18: if the love is a homonym the cruller is a kind of a homonym. sent19: if the love is not a wirework that it subtracts genus and is not non-aerobics is not true. sent20: either the love is not a kind of a homonym or it does snow earphone or both. sent21: if the fact that the Kui does not subtract aqualung hold then the fact that the love either is not a homonym or does not snow earphone or both is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the love snows earphone.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the love subtracts aqualung.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the Kui does subtract genus.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the pen is beautiful.; sent13 -> int4: the pen is not beautiful.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the love does not snow earphone is not wrong.; int6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__