the saltbush is not non-eolithic but it is not a recurrence.
sent1: if the Ojibwa is a kind of a incompressibility the PIN is not cryptogamic and it is not a kind of a Panax. sent2: something that is not a kind of a incompressibility and is not a philosophy is not declarative. sent3: if the hessian is a recurrence the saltbush is a recurrence. sent4: the fact that the saltbush is eolithic and is not a recurrence is wrong if the hessian is declarative. sent5: the PIN is not a Panax if the Ojibwa is a kind of a Panax that is eolithic. sent6: the actuator is not non-lax. sent7: something is a kind of a incompressibility if it is a philosophy. sent8: the PIN is not a kind of a incompressibility and it is not a kind of a philosophy if it is not a Seleucus. sent9: the saltbush is not Olympics. sent10: if the fact that something is not Moravian and is not a Tracy hold then it does not chance afterdeck. sent11: the PIN is declarative if the hessian is cryptogamic. sent12: the PIN is not a Seleucus. sent13: the miner is non-stingless. sent14: the fact that the saltbush is not cryptogamic if that the hessian is a kind of declarative thing that is cryptogamic is wrong is not false. sent15: if the hessian is a kind of a incompressibility then it is Olympics. sent16: the hessian is cryptogamic if the fact that either it is not Olympics or it is a murrain or both is not correct. sent17: if the miner is not stingless then it is a chert and it does demineralize pentaerythritol. sent18: if the PIN is not cryptogamic and is not a kind of a Panax the hessian is declarative. sent19: that the PIN is not a Panax hold. sent20: if the saltbush is a philosophy it is a kind of a recurrence. sent21: if something is a Seleucus then it is a philosophy. sent22: something is a Panax if it is not Olympics or a murrain or both. sent23: if the PIN is not a kind of a Panax then the fact that the hessian is declarative and it is cryptogamic does not hold. sent24: the fact that the hessian is not a Panax is not wrong if it is a philosophy and is not eolithic. sent25: if something is a kind of a Panax then that it is eolithic is not wrong. sent26: if something is lax the miner is a Tracy and it does chance g.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hessian is not Olympics and/or it is a murrain is not true.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the hessian is cryptogamic.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the PIN is declarative.; sent2 -> int3: the PIN is not declarative if it is not a incompressibility and is not a kind of a philosophy.; sent8 & sent12 -> int4: the PIN is not a incompressibility and not a philosophy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the PIN is not declarative hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the hessian is not Olympics or it is a kind of a murrain or both.; sent22 -> int8: if either the hessian is non-Olympics or it is a murrain or both it is a Panax.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hessian is a Panax.; sent25 -> int10: the hessian is eolithic if it is a kind of a Panax.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the hessian is eolithic.;
the fact that the saltbush is both eolithic and not a recurrence does not hold.
sent7 -> int12: the Ojibwa is a incompressibility if it is a philosophy.; sent21 -> int13: the Ojibwa is a philosophy if it is a kind of a Seleucus.; sent17 & sent13 -> int14: that the miner is a kind of a chert and it demineralizes pentaerythritol hold.; int14 -> int15: the miner is a chert.; sent6 -> int16: there exists something such that the fact that it is lax is not wrong.; int16 & sent26 -> int17: the miner is a Tracy and does chance g.; int17 -> int18: the miner is a Tracy.; int15 & int18 -> int19: the miner is a kind of a chert and is a Tracy.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it is a chert and it is a kind of a Tracy.;
$hypothesis$ = the saltbush is not non-eolithic but it is not a recurrence. ; $context$ = sent1: if the Ojibwa is a kind of a incompressibility the PIN is not cryptogamic and it is not a kind of a Panax. sent2: something that is not a kind of a incompressibility and is not a philosophy is not declarative. sent3: if the hessian is a recurrence the saltbush is a recurrence. sent4: the fact that the saltbush is eolithic and is not a recurrence is wrong if the hessian is declarative. sent5: the PIN is not a Panax if the Ojibwa is a kind of a Panax that is eolithic. sent6: the actuator is not non-lax. sent7: something is a kind of a incompressibility if it is a philosophy. sent8: the PIN is not a kind of a incompressibility and it is not a kind of a philosophy if it is not a Seleucus. sent9: the saltbush is not Olympics. sent10: if the fact that something is not Moravian and is not a Tracy hold then it does not chance afterdeck. sent11: the PIN is declarative if the hessian is cryptogamic. sent12: the PIN is not a Seleucus. sent13: the miner is non-stingless. sent14: the fact that the saltbush is not cryptogamic if that the hessian is a kind of declarative thing that is cryptogamic is wrong is not false. sent15: if the hessian is a kind of a incompressibility then it is Olympics. sent16: the hessian is cryptogamic if the fact that either it is not Olympics or it is a murrain or both is not correct. sent17: if the miner is not stingless then it is a chert and it does demineralize pentaerythritol. sent18: if the PIN is not cryptogamic and is not a kind of a Panax the hessian is declarative. sent19: that the PIN is not a Panax hold. sent20: if the saltbush is a philosophy it is a kind of a recurrence. sent21: if something is a Seleucus then it is a philosophy. sent22: something is a Panax if it is not Olympics or a murrain or both. sent23: if the PIN is not a kind of a Panax then the fact that the hessian is declarative and it is cryptogamic does not hold. sent24: the fact that the hessian is not a Panax is not wrong if it is a philosophy and is not eolithic. sent25: if something is a kind of a Panax then that it is eolithic is not wrong. sent26: if something is lax the miner is a Tracy and it does chance g. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the hessian is not Olympics and/or it is a murrain is not true.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the hessian is cryptogamic.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the PIN is declarative.; sent2 -> int3: the PIN is not declarative if it is not a incompressibility and is not a kind of a philosophy.; sent8 & sent12 -> int4: the PIN is not a incompressibility and not a philosophy.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the fact that the PIN is not declarative hold.; int2 & int5 -> int6: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int6 -> int7: the hessian is not Olympics or it is a kind of a murrain or both.; sent22 -> int8: if either the hessian is non-Olympics or it is a murrain or both it is a Panax.; int7 & int8 -> int9: the hessian is a Panax.; sent25 -> int10: the hessian is eolithic if it is a kind of a Panax.; int9 & int10 -> int11: the hessian is eolithic.; __UNKNOWN__