both the depredation and the anatomy occurs.
sent1: if the metamorphousness does not occur that the depredation and the anatomy happens does not hold. sent2: if the rekindling sourness does not occur that the offering cybernaut does not occur and the counterglow does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the ordeal does not occur. sent4: if the charting does not occur then the fact that the offering cybernaut does not occur is not false. sent5: if the allotropy does not occur then the ordeal occurs. sent6: the housework does not occur if the metamorphousness does not occur and the allotropy does not occur. sent7: the counterglow occurs. sent8: the operaticness does not occur. sent9: if that the metamorphousness does not occur and/or the allotropy does not occur does not hold the charting does not occur. sent10: the activation and the alibiing esker occurs. sent11: the misbehavior occurs if the air-to-airness does not occur. sent12: the anatomy occurs. sent13: that the depredation happens is caused by that the offering cybernaut does not occur but the counterglow occurs. sent14: if the metamorphousness does not occur then the ordeal happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the metamorphousness does not occur or the allotropy does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the ordeal occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the metamorphousness does not occur and/or the allotropy does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the charting does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the offering cybernaut does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: not the offering cybernaut but the counterglow happens.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the depredation occurs is correct.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the housework does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = both the depredation and the anatomy occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: if the metamorphousness does not occur that the depredation and the anatomy happens does not hold. sent2: if the rekindling sourness does not occur that the offering cybernaut does not occur and the counterglow does not occur is incorrect. sent3: the ordeal does not occur. sent4: if the charting does not occur then the fact that the offering cybernaut does not occur is not false. sent5: if the allotropy does not occur then the ordeal occurs. sent6: the housework does not occur if the metamorphousness does not occur and the allotropy does not occur. sent7: the counterglow occurs. sent8: the operaticness does not occur. sent9: if that the metamorphousness does not occur and/or the allotropy does not occur does not hold the charting does not occur. sent10: the activation and the alibiing esker occurs. sent11: the misbehavior occurs if the air-to-airness does not occur. sent12: the anatomy occurs. sent13: that the depredation happens is caused by that the offering cybernaut does not occur but the counterglow occurs. sent14: if the metamorphousness does not occur then the ordeal happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the metamorphousness does not occur or the allotropy does not occur or both.; assump1 & sent14 & sent5 -> int1: the ordeal occurs.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the metamorphousness does not occur and/or the allotropy does not occur is not right.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: the charting does not occur.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the offering cybernaut does not occur.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: not the offering cybernaut but the counterglow happens.; int6 & sent13 -> int7: the fact that the depredation occurs is correct.; int7 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__