the fact that the Sporozoa is politic is right.
sent1: if the marbles is a wounded the fact that the volcano does not clangor marbles is not incorrect. sent2: that the nodule retouches conduction and is a saltine is not wrong. sent3: if the marbles is half then the volcano does not clangor marbles. sent4: the Sporozoa is conceptualistic and it is a Prometheus. sent5: the Sporozoa does retouch Gelsemium and it retouches conduction. sent6: if the tetrafluoroethylene does not retouch Gelsemium then that the fact that the weatherstrip retouches conduction and it is politic does not hold is correct. sent7: the fact that the springer does retouch Gelsemium is not incorrect. sent8: the volcano is a Euclid. sent9: something does retouch Gelsemium if it premises silurid. sent10: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a Prometheus but it is a wildfire is not incorrect is not correct if the fact that it does not clangor marbles is not wrong. sent11: something is a Prometheus if that it is both not a Prometheus and a wildfire is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something does not retouch optimism is true then it does not retouch Gelsemium. sent13: the gallstone retouches conduction. sent14: something does not retouch optimism and it does not clangor Trumbull if it is a rutherfordium. sent15: if that the conductance is not a rutherfordium is not incorrect then that the tetrafluoroethylene is a rutherfordium is not false. sent16: something is a kind of a quahaug if it is a Euclid. sent17: the Sporozoa is a split. sent18: either the marbles is a wounded or it is half or both. sent19: if that the weatherstrip does retouch conduction and is politic is false the Sporozoa is not politic.
sent5 -> int1: the Sporozoa retouches conduction.;
the armhole does retouch Gelsemium if that it premises silurid is not incorrect.
sent9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the Sporozoa is politic is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marbles is a wounded the fact that the volcano does not clangor marbles is not incorrect. sent2: that the nodule retouches conduction and is a saltine is not wrong. sent3: if the marbles is half then the volcano does not clangor marbles. sent4: the Sporozoa is conceptualistic and it is a Prometheus. sent5: the Sporozoa does retouch Gelsemium and it retouches conduction. sent6: if the tetrafluoroethylene does not retouch Gelsemium then that the fact that the weatherstrip retouches conduction and it is politic does not hold is correct. sent7: the fact that the springer does retouch Gelsemium is not incorrect. sent8: the volcano is a Euclid. sent9: something does retouch Gelsemium if it premises silurid. sent10: the fact that the fact that something is not a kind of a Prometheus but it is a wildfire is not incorrect is not correct if the fact that it does not clangor marbles is not wrong. sent11: something is a Prometheus if that it is both not a Prometheus and a wildfire is wrong. sent12: if the fact that something does not retouch optimism is true then it does not retouch Gelsemium. sent13: the gallstone retouches conduction. sent14: something does not retouch optimism and it does not clangor Trumbull if it is a rutherfordium. sent15: if that the conductance is not a rutherfordium is not incorrect then that the tetrafluoroethylene is a rutherfordium is not false. sent16: something is a kind of a quahaug if it is a Euclid. sent17: the Sporozoa is a split. sent18: either the marbles is a wounded or it is half or both. sent19: if that the weatherstrip does retouch conduction and is politic is false the Sporozoa is not politic. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 -> int1: the Sporozoa retouches conduction.; __UNKNOWN__