there exists something such that if it does debrief spastic then the fact that it is not a cutting or it is not a kind of a pieta or both is incorrect.
sent1: the bandit is not a pieta. sent2: the Tudor does not amplify Meridian or it does not surface cement or both if it cuts. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a republican is not wrong the fact that either it does not amplify Meridian or it is a kind of a mineral or both is not right. sent4: if the monomer does not recriminate then it does not spoil contractility. sent5: the strand does not amplify ductule. sent6: either the bandit is not a FO or it does not debrief spastic or both if it does surface Vasari. sent7: there is something such that if it is a self-service that it does debrief Scranton and/or it does not nuzzle is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it erupts that it does amplify Wesleyan is right. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a marginality then it is a kind of a coachman. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a benzodiazepine then that it is a cuspidation or it is not angiomatous or both does not hold. sent11: if the strand is impartial then the fact that either it does debrief spastic or it does not underdress or both is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if it is a fastnacht then it is a kind of a gyneolatry. sent13: if the pillory does amplify ductule the fact that it is not summery or does not debrief spastic or both does not hold. sent14: the strand is not a kind of an epileptic and/or it cuts. sent15: the fact that the strand does not debrief spastic or is not connotative or both is wrong if it is Aleutian. sent16: there exists something such that if it does spoil fibrocartilage that it is not Aleutian and/or is a sternness is not true.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the strand is not a cutting or it is not a pieta or both.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does debrief spastic then the fact that it is not a cutting or it is not a kind of a pieta or both is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the bandit is not a pieta. sent2: the Tudor does not amplify Meridian or it does not surface cement or both if it cuts. sent3: there exists something such that if that it is a kind of a republican is not wrong the fact that either it does not amplify Meridian or it is a kind of a mineral or both is not right. sent4: if the monomer does not recriminate then it does not spoil contractility. sent5: the strand does not amplify ductule. sent6: either the bandit is not a FO or it does not debrief spastic or both if it does surface Vasari. sent7: there is something such that if it is a self-service that it does debrief Scranton and/or it does not nuzzle is incorrect. sent8: there exists something such that if it erupts that it does amplify Wesleyan is right. sent9: there exists something such that if it is a marginality then it is a kind of a coachman. sent10: there exists something such that if it is a benzodiazepine then that it is a cuspidation or it is not angiomatous or both does not hold. sent11: if the strand is impartial then the fact that either it does debrief spastic or it does not underdress or both is not correct. sent12: there is something such that if it is a fastnacht then it is a kind of a gyneolatry. sent13: if the pillory does amplify ductule the fact that it is not summery or does not debrief spastic or both does not hold. sent14: the strand is not a kind of an epileptic and/or it cuts. sent15: the fact that the strand does not debrief spastic or is not connotative or both is wrong if it is Aleutian. sent16: there exists something such that if it does spoil fibrocartilage that it is not Aleutian and/or is a sternness is not true. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that either the strand is not a cutting or it is not a pieta or both.; __UNKNOWN__