the fact that the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane greens is right.
sent1: if the triumvir either does not butt flimsiness or does not cozen condonation or both the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane is a kind of a green. sent2: something is not a Termitidae if the fact that it is a catchphrase is true. sent3: if something is a catchphrase then the fact that it is a kind of a Termitidae and/or it does not accede does not hold. sent4: that the hogback is a catchphrase is true. sent5: the fact that the pipewort does not butt flimsiness hold if it is rationalistic and it is cataphatic. sent6: if the triumvir is not a kind of a catchphrase then that the pipewort is a green and not cataphatic is incorrect. sent7: something is a kind of a Termitidae or it does not accede or both. sent8: the triumvir does not butt flimsiness and/or does not cozen condonation if the pipewort does not butt flimsiness. sent9: the triumvir either does butt flimsiness or does not cozen condonation or both. sent10: the pipewort is rationalistic if the anther does tin. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is a Termitidae and/or does not accede is incorrect the pipewort is cataphatic. sent12: if the triumvir does not butt flimsiness the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane is green. sent13: if the anther does butt flimsiness it is rationalistic. sent14: everything is a Scribe. sent15: the triumvir butts flimsiness and/or it does not cozen condonation if the pipewort does not butts flimsiness. sent16: the hogback is not a Termitidae. sent17: there is something such that that it is a Termitidae and/or it does accede does not hold. sent18: everything is a tinning that is a Scribe. sent19: there is something such that it accedes. sent20: if the fission butts flimsiness and is not a tinning then the anther butts flimsiness. sent21: the anther is a Scribe. sent22: if the fact that the hogback is a catchphrase is not false then it is not a kind of a Termitidae. sent23: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Termitidae.
sent3 -> int1: if the hogback is a catchphrase the fact that it is a Termitidae and/or it does not accede is wrong.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that either the hogback is a Termitidae or it does not accede or both is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is a Termitidae or it does not accede or both is not right.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the pipewort is cataphatic.; sent18 -> int5: the anther is both a tinning and a Scribe.; int5 -> int6: the anther is a kind of a tinning.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the pipewort is rationalistic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the pipewort is both rationalistic and not non-cataphatic.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the pipewort does not butt flimsiness.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the triumvir does not butt flimsiness and/or does not cozen condonation.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane is not a kind of a green.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane greens is right. ; $context$ = sent1: if the triumvir either does not butt flimsiness or does not cozen condonation or both the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane is a kind of a green. sent2: something is not a Termitidae if the fact that it is a catchphrase is true. sent3: if something is a catchphrase then the fact that it is a kind of a Termitidae and/or it does not accede does not hold. sent4: that the hogback is a catchphrase is true. sent5: the fact that the pipewort does not butt flimsiness hold if it is rationalistic and it is cataphatic. sent6: if the triumvir is not a kind of a catchphrase then that the pipewort is a green and not cataphatic is incorrect. sent7: something is a kind of a Termitidae or it does not accede or both. sent8: the triumvir does not butt flimsiness and/or does not cozen condonation if the pipewort does not butt flimsiness. sent9: the triumvir either does butt flimsiness or does not cozen condonation or both. sent10: the pipewort is rationalistic if the anther does tin. sent11: if there exists something such that that it is a Termitidae and/or does not accede is incorrect the pipewort is cataphatic. sent12: if the triumvir does not butt flimsiness the dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane is green. sent13: if the anther does butt flimsiness it is rationalistic. sent14: everything is a Scribe. sent15: the triumvir butts flimsiness and/or it does not cozen condonation if the pipewort does not butts flimsiness. sent16: the hogback is not a Termitidae. sent17: there is something such that that it is a Termitidae and/or it does accede does not hold. sent18: everything is a tinning that is a Scribe. sent19: there is something such that it accedes. sent20: if the fission butts flimsiness and is not a tinning then the anther butts flimsiness. sent21: the anther is a Scribe. sent22: if the fact that the hogback is a catchphrase is not false then it is not a kind of a Termitidae. sent23: there is something such that it is not a kind of a Termitidae. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: if the hogback is a catchphrase the fact that it is a Termitidae and/or it does not accede is wrong.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: that either the hogback is a Termitidae or it does not accede or both is not true.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that that it is a Termitidae or it does not accede or both is not right.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the pipewort is cataphatic.; sent18 -> int5: the anther is both a tinning and a Scribe.; int5 -> int6: the anther is a kind of a tinning.; sent10 & int6 -> int7: the pipewort is rationalistic.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the pipewort is both rationalistic and not non-cataphatic.; int8 & sent5 -> int9: the pipewort does not butt flimsiness.; int9 & sent8 -> int10: the triumvir does not butt flimsiness and/or does not cozen condonation.; int10 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__