the panopticon is a sapote and not a tremble.
sent1: the chatterer is a Oken and/or it is antennal. sent2: the chatterer vexes flamenco and it is a Oken. sent3: the panopticon is not a tremble if it is plumbic or redemptive or both. sent4: that the panopticon is not a sapote is wrong. sent5: if something is thermoelectric and it does grandstand then the fact that the panopticon is plumbic is correct. sent6: the chatterer is a kind of a tuning. sent7: the scaffold is a sapote. sent8: if the fact that the chatterer does tune hold it is a kind of a grandstand. sent9: that there is something such that that it is not thermoelectric is not incorrect is correct. sent10: if the chatterer does vex flamenco then it is thermoelectric. sent11: the panopticon is a antediluvian.
sent2 -> int1: that the chatterer vexes flamenco is right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the chatterer is thermoelectric.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the chatterer does grandstand.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chatterer is thermoelectric and it is a kind of a grandstand.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is thermoelectric and it is a kind of a grandstand is not incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the panopticon is plumbic.; int6 -> int7: the panopticon is plumbic and/or is redemptive.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the panopticon is not a tremble.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the Crown is a tremble and it is normal.
$hypothesis$ = the panopticon is a sapote and not a tremble. ; $context$ = sent1: the chatterer is a Oken and/or it is antennal. sent2: the chatterer vexes flamenco and it is a Oken. sent3: the panopticon is not a tremble if it is plumbic or redemptive or both. sent4: that the panopticon is not a sapote is wrong. sent5: if something is thermoelectric and it does grandstand then the fact that the panopticon is plumbic is correct. sent6: the chatterer is a kind of a tuning. sent7: the scaffold is a sapote. sent8: if the fact that the chatterer does tune hold it is a kind of a grandstand. sent9: that there is something such that that it is not thermoelectric is not incorrect is correct. sent10: if the chatterer does vex flamenco then it is thermoelectric. sent11: the panopticon is a antediluvian. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: that the chatterer vexes flamenco is right.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the chatterer is thermoelectric.; sent8 & sent6 -> int3: the chatterer does grandstand.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the chatterer is thermoelectric and it is a kind of a grandstand.; int4 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that it is thermoelectric and it is a kind of a grandstand is not incorrect.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: the panopticon is plumbic.; int6 -> int7: the panopticon is plumbic and/or is redemptive.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the panopticon is not a tremble.; int8 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__