the combustible does defuse guy.
sent1: if the filly is not ventilatory then that the Jenny skates but it does not defuse guy is not right. sent2: if something is not a afflatus it does skate. sent3: if the Jenny is not a obscurantist it is a kind of a afflatus that is ventilatory. sent4: if the combustible is not a kind of a afflatus it chloroforms and it is ventilatory. sent5: something defuses guy if the fact that it is a obscurantist hold. sent6: the fact that the fiberglass is not a kind of a stoning and chloroforms is not correct. sent7: if that the hailstone is not a kind of a obscurantist is true that it is a kind of a afflatus that is not a dealer is incorrect. sent8: something is a kind of a obscurantist if it does skate. sent9: if the fact that the Jenny is not a chloroform and is ventilatory is wrong then the fact that it skates is not wrong. sent10: the fact that something does not skate but it is ventilatory is not correct if it is a afflatus. sent11: if the colonial is not Gallic it titrates and is callithumpian. sent12: the Jenny is zygomatic. sent13: the colonial is not topographical. sent14: if the Jenny is zygomatic then that the combustible is not zygomatic and is a skating is not correct. sent15: if the colonial is not topographical it is not Gallic. sent16: if the Jenny is not ventilatory it is a kind of zygomatic thing that is a chloroform. sent17: that something is not a kind of a obscurantist but it is irreparable is wrong if it titrates. sent18: that the Jenny is not ventilatory is true. sent19: the hailstone is not a obscurantist if the fact that the colonial is not a obscurantist and is irreparable is not correct. sent20: if the filly does not titrate then it is a kind of a obscurantist that is a kind of a dealer. sent21: if the filly is not a afflatus the fact that the Jenny is a skating that is non-ventilatory is not correct. sent22: if the combustible is not a afflatus then it does skate. sent23: if the Jenny is not ventilatory then it is zygomatic. sent24: the fact that something is a skating is not incorrect if that it is not a chloroform and it is a afflatus does not hold.
sent16 & sent18 -> int1: the Jenny is both zygomatic and a chloroform.; int1 -> int2: the Jenny does chloroform.; sent24 -> int3: the combustible does skate if that it does not chloroform and is a afflatus is not right.; sent8 -> int4: the combustible is a obscurantist if it is a skating.; sent5 -> int5: if the combustible is a obscurantist then it does defuse guy.;
the fact that the combustible does not defuse guy is correct.
sent17 -> int6: if the colonial titrates that it is not a obscurantist and it is irreparable does not hold.; sent15 & sent13 -> int7: the colonial is not Gallic.; sent11 & int7 -> int8: that the colonial titrates and it is callithumpian is not incorrect.; int8 -> int9: the colonial titrates.; int6 & int9 -> int10: that the colonial is not a obscurantist but it is irreparable is wrong.; sent19 & int10 -> int11: the hailstone is not a kind of a obscurantist.; sent7 & int11 -> int12: that the hailstone is a afflatus and is not a dealer does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a afflatus that is not a dealer is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the combustible does defuse guy. ; $context$ = sent1: if the filly is not ventilatory then that the Jenny skates but it does not defuse guy is not right. sent2: if something is not a afflatus it does skate. sent3: if the Jenny is not a obscurantist it is a kind of a afflatus that is ventilatory. sent4: if the combustible is not a kind of a afflatus it chloroforms and it is ventilatory. sent5: something defuses guy if the fact that it is a obscurantist hold. sent6: the fact that the fiberglass is not a kind of a stoning and chloroforms is not correct. sent7: if that the hailstone is not a kind of a obscurantist is true that it is a kind of a afflatus that is not a dealer is incorrect. sent8: something is a kind of a obscurantist if it does skate. sent9: if the fact that the Jenny is not a chloroform and is ventilatory is wrong then the fact that it skates is not wrong. sent10: the fact that something does not skate but it is ventilatory is not correct if it is a afflatus. sent11: if the colonial is not Gallic it titrates and is callithumpian. sent12: the Jenny is zygomatic. sent13: the colonial is not topographical. sent14: if the Jenny is zygomatic then that the combustible is not zygomatic and is a skating is not correct. sent15: if the colonial is not topographical it is not Gallic. sent16: if the Jenny is not ventilatory it is a kind of zygomatic thing that is a chloroform. sent17: that something is not a kind of a obscurantist but it is irreparable is wrong if it titrates. sent18: that the Jenny is not ventilatory is true. sent19: the hailstone is not a obscurantist if the fact that the colonial is not a obscurantist and is irreparable is not correct. sent20: if the filly does not titrate then it is a kind of a obscurantist that is a kind of a dealer. sent21: if the filly is not a afflatus the fact that the Jenny is a skating that is non-ventilatory is not correct. sent22: if the combustible is not a afflatus then it does skate. sent23: if the Jenny is not ventilatory then it is zygomatic. sent24: the fact that something is a skating is not incorrect if that it is not a chloroform and it is a afflatus does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 & sent18 -> int1: the Jenny is both zygomatic and a chloroform.; int1 -> int2: the Jenny does chloroform.; sent24 -> int3: the combustible does skate if that it does not chloroform and is a afflatus is not right.; sent8 -> int4: the combustible is a obscurantist if it is a skating.; sent5 -> int5: if the combustible is a obscurantist then it does defuse guy.; __UNKNOWN__