the liposuction does not occur.
sent1: the fracturing Respighi does not occur. sent2: that both the diplomaticness and the unargumentativeness occurs is triggered by that the fracturing Respighi does not occur. sent3: the catching does not occur. sent4: if the cartage happens the fact that both the diplomaticness and the non-argumentativeness occurs does not hold. sent5: the ELISA is caused by that the liposuction does not occur and the Muslim does not occur. sent6: if the cartage does not occur that the ELISA does not occur is true. sent7: if the cryogenicness happens then the Muslim happens. sent8: the fracturing Respighi occurs if the fact that the fracturing Respighi does not occur but the fracturing changer happens is not right. sent9: that the cryogenicness happens and the fracturing changer occurs is caused by that the catching does not occur. sent10: the liposuction does not occur if that not the ELISA but the Muslim occurs hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cartage happens is right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the diplomaticness and the unargumentativeness occurs is wrong.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the diplomaticness and the non-argumentativeness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cartage does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the ELISA does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int6: the cryogenicness occurs and the fracturing changer occurs.; int6 -> int7: the cryogenicness occurs.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the Muslimness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the ELISA does not occur but the Muslim happens.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis;
the reciprocity occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the liposuction does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the fracturing Respighi does not occur. sent2: that both the diplomaticness and the unargumentativeness occurs is triggered by that the fracturing Respighi does not occur. sent3: the catching does not occur. sent4: if the cartage happens the fact that both the diplomaticness and the non-argumentativeness occurs does not hold. sent5: the ELISA is caused by that the liposuction does not occur and the Muslim does not occur. sent6: if the cartage does not occur that the ELISA does not occur is true. sent7: if the cryogenicness happens then the Muslim happens. sent8: the fracturing Respighi occurs if the fact that the fracturing Respighi does not occur but the fracturing changer happens is not right. sent9: that the cryogenicness happens and the fracturing changer occurs is caused by that the catching does not occur. sent10: the liposuction does not occur if that not the ELISA but the Muslim occurs hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the cartage happens is right.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the diplomaticness and the unargumentativeness occurs is wrong.; sent2 & sent1 -> int2: the diplomaticness and the non-argumentativeness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the cartage does not occur.; int4 & sent6 -> int5: the ELISA does not occur.; sent9 & sent3 -> int6: the cryogenicness occurs and the fracturing changer occurs.; int6 -> int7: the cryogenicness occurs.; sent7 & int7 -> int8: the Muslimness occurs.; int5 & int8 -> int9: the ELISA does not occur but the Muslim happens.; int9 & sent10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__