the swindle occurs and the IV happens.
sent1: that the de-escalation does not occur prevents that the uricosuricness does not occur. sent2: the modal occurs. sent3: that the expostulation happens is correct. sent4: the fact that the swindle and the IV occurs is not correct if the modal does not occur. sent5: that the de-escalation does not occur triggers that the uricosuricness and the IV happens. sent6: both the Tongan and the enforceableness happens. sent7: if the naught occurs then the postmodernistness happens. sent8: the de-escalation does not occur. sent9: the exalting gossiping happens and the logogrammaticness occurs. sent10: that the prohibition happens hold. sent11: that the braggadocio does not occur and the uricosuricness does not occur results in the non-modalness. sent12: the exalting Albigensianism does not occur. sent13: both the modal and the braggadocio occurs. sent14: both the scoffing conacaste and the Stinger happens. sent15: that the mustering and the pavane occurs is caused by that the enskying Petaurus does not occur. sent16: both the span and the Sabbatarianness occurs. sent17: the uricosuricness happens.
sent13 -> int1: the braggadocio occurs.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: that both the uricosuricness and the IV happens is true.; int2 -> int3: the IV occurs.;
the fact that the fact that the swindle and the IV occurs is not true is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the swindle occurs and the IV happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the de-escalation does not occur prevents that the uricosuricness does not occur. sent2: the modal occurs. sent3: that the expostulation happens is correct. sent4: the fact that the swindle and the IV occurs is not correct if the modal does not occur. sent5: that the de-escalation does not occur triggers that the uricosuricness and the IV happens. sent6: both the Tongan and the enforceableness happens. sent7: if the naught occurs then the postmodernistness happens. sent8: the de-escalation does not occur. sent9: the exalting gossiping happens and the logogrammaticness occurs. sent10: that the prohibition happens hold. sent11: that the braggadocio does not occur and the uricosuricness does not occur results in the non-modalness. sent12: the exalting Albigensianism does not occur. sent13: both the modal and the braggadocio occurs. sent14: both the scoffing conacaste and the Stinger happens. sent15: that the mustering and the pavane occurs is caused by that the enskying Petaurus does not occur. sent16: both the span and the Sabbatarianness occurs. sent17: the uricosuricness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 -> int1: the braggadocio occurs.; sent5 & sent8 -> int2: that both the uricosuricness and the IV happens is true.; int2 -> int3: the IV occurs.; __UNKNOWN__