the escapement is a kind of non-wet thing that leans ambition.
sent1: if the wattmeter forgets then the confiture is not a popularizer and it does not lean ethologist. sent2: something is not autologous if that it is autologous and does not forget is false. sent3: if the confiture is not a popularizer and does not lean ethologist the button wets. sent4: the confiture does not lean ethologist and it is not wet if the escapement leans ambition. sent5: the button does not lean ambition. sent6: the wrecker is autologous. sent7: if the fact that the wrecker is autologous hold that the ethologist is phonemic but it is not strong does not hold. sent8: if something is not autologous the fact that the fact that it is not wet and leans ambition is correct is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the fact that something is autologous but it does not forget is not wrong is wrong if the fact that it is not a popularizer is correct. sent10: if the confiture is not a popularizer and leans ethologist then the button does wet. sent11: the wattmeter forgets if the fact that the ethologist is a kind of phonemic thing that is not strong is false. sent12: if the button wets the escapement is not wets but it leans ambition.
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the ethologist is phonemic thing that is not strong is not correct.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the wattmeter does forget is not wrong.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the confiture is not a popularizer and does not lean ethologist.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the button wets.; sent12 & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the escapement is a kind of non-wet thing that leans ambition is incorrect.
sent8 -> int5: if the wrecker is not autologous the fact that it is non-wet and it does lean ambition is not correct.; sent2 -> int6: that the wrecker is non-autologous is correct if that it is non-autologous and does not forget is incorrect.; sent9 -> int7: the fact that the ethologist is a kind of autologous thing that does not forget does not hold if it is not a popularizer.;
$hypothesis$ = the escapement is a kind of non-wet thing that leans ambition. ; $context$ = sent1: if the wattmeter forgets then the confiture is not a popularizer and it does not lean ethologist. sent2: something is not autologous if that it is autologous and does not forget is false. sent3: if the confiture is not a popularizer and does not lean ethologist the button wets. sent4: the confiture does not lean ethologist and it is not wet if the escapement leans ambition. sent5: the button does not lean ambition. sent6: the wrecker is autologous. sent7: if the fact that the wrecker is autologous hold that the ethologist is phonemic but it is not strong does not hold. sent8: if something is not autologous the fact that the fact that it is not wet and leans ambition is correct is incorrect. sent9: the fact that the fact that something is autologous but it does not forget is not wrong is wrong if the fact that it is not a popularizer is correct. sent10: if the confiture is not a popularizer and leans ethologist then the button does wet. sent11: the wattmeter forgets if the fact that the ethologist is a kind of phonemic thing that is not strong is false. sent12: if the button wets the escapement is not wets but it leans ambition. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 & sent6 -> int1: the fact that the ethologist is phonemic thing that is not strong is not correct.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the fact that the wattmeter does forget is not wrong.; sent1 & int2 -> int3: the confiture is not a popularizer and does not lean ethologist.; sent3 & int3 -> int4: the button wets.; sent12 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__