the underbelly harlequins.
sent1: the schoolgirl is not a simazine if the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a Docetism. sent2: the fact that the fact that something is not an integration but it is a simazine is not incorrect is wrong if it does not maintain Syrian. sent3: if the fact that the firth does not maintain Syrian but it is a symptom does not hold the fact that the mind is not a burden is true. sent4: if the bus is not an integration the howdah is not a Docetism. sent5: if the fact that the bus is not a kind of an integration and is a kind of a simazine is not correct the underbelly is not an integration. sent6: the mastiff is not an integration if that the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a kind of a Docetism does not hold. sent7: that the firth does not maintain Syrian and is a kind of a symptom is wrong if the schoolgirl is not a kind of a simazine. sent8: something does harlequin and it is not lipped if it is not a kind of an integration. sent9: the howdah is not an integration but it is lipless if the mastiff is not an integration. sent10: if the fact that something is a simazine and is not an integration does not hold then it is lipless. sent11: that the howdah is not a kind of an integration but it is lipless is wrong. sent12: if the howdah does not detribalize instroke the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is an integration. sent13: the fact that the underbelly is not a kind of a harlequin is not false if that the mind is not a burden is correct. sent14: if the fact that the howdah is not a symptom is right the firth is not a symptom and is a kind of an integration.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a Docetism is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the mastiff is not an integration hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the howdah is not an integration and is lipless.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a kind of a Docetism.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the schoolgirl is not a simazine.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the firth does not maintain Syrian and is a kind of a symptom is not correct.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the mind is not a kind of a burden.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
the raider is not a headship but it is a Philippian.
sent10 -> int8: the bus is lipless if that the fact that it is a simazine and it is not a kind of an integration hold is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the underbelly harlequins. ; $context$ = sent1: the schoolgirl is not a simazine if the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a Docetism. sent2: the fact that the fact that something is not an integration but it is a simazine is not incorrect is wrong if it does not maintain Syrian. sent3: if the fact that the firth does not maintain Syrian but it is a symptom does not hold the fact that the mind is not a burden is true. sent4: if the bus is not an integration the howdah is not a Docetism. sent5: if the fact that the bus is not a kind of an integration and is a kind of a simazine is not correct the underbelly is not an integration. sent6: the mastiff is not an integration if that the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a kind of a Docetism does not hold. sent7: that the firth does not maintain Syrian and is a kind of a symptom is wrong if the schoolgirl is not a kind of a simazine. sent8: something does harlequin and it is not lipped if it is not a kind of an integration. sent9: the howdah is not an integration but it is lipless if the mastiff is not an integration. sent10: if the fact that something is a simazine and is not an integration does not hold then it is lipless. sent11: that the howdah is not a kind of an integration but it is lipless is wrong. sent12: if the howdah does not detribalize instroke the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is an integration. sent13: the fact that the underbelly is not a kind of a harlequin is not false if that the mind is not a burden is correct. sent14: if the fact that the howdah is not a symptom is right the firth is not a symptom and is a kind of an integration. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a Docetism is incorrect.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the mastiff is not an integration hold.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the howdah is not an integration and is lipless.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the bus does not detribalize instroke but it is a kind of a Docetism.; int4 & sent1 -> int5: the schoolgirl is not a simazine.; int5 & sent7 -> int6: that the firth does not maintain Syrian and is a kind of a symptom is not correct.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the mind is not a kind of a burden.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__