if the mixed-blood does not budget stab then the cornerback does refine trespass or it reproduces or both.
sent1: the mixed-blood does reproduce and it is penal if something does brazen. sent2: if the mixed-blood budgets stab it does reproduce. sent3: the mixed-blood is a paisley or it is a Fauve or both if that the cornerback does not refine trespass is correct. sent4: the abstraction is biotypic if the fact that it does not budget courthouse and it is disrespectful is not right. sent5: either the dandruff is a Onychium or it budgets stab or both. sent6: if the fact that the mixed-blood does not budget stab but it is a paisley does not hold then it is a Fauve. sent7: the cornerback is not a kind of a amnion. sent8: if something is multiform then it is both brazen and not euphoric. sent9: the cornerback is a kind of a triolein that is multiform if it is not a kind of a amnion. sent10: if the fact that something is not dysgenics but a partiality is false it is ebracteate. sent11: if something does reproduce that it refines trespass and it does not budget stab is not true. sent12: if the fact that something is both not a paisley and a Fauve is not correct it does refine trespass. sent13: the cockateel does not refine trespass. sent14: the wassail does not refine trespass if that that the mixed-blood refine trespass and does not budget stab is false is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mixed-blood does not budget stab.; sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the cornerback is not a kind of a paisley but it is a Fauve is not true it does refine trespass.;
the wassail does not refine trespass.
sent11 -> int2: the fact that the mixed-blood refines trespass and does not budget stab does not hold if it reproduces.; sent8 -> int3: if the cornerback is multiform it does brazen and it is not euphoric.; sent9 & sent7 -> int4: the cornerback is both a triolein and multiform.; int4 -> int5: the cornerback is multiform.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the cornerback is brazen but not euphoric.; int6 -> int7: the cornerback does brazen.; int7 -> int8: there is something such that it does brazen.; int8 & sent1 -> int9: the mixed-blood reproduces and is not non-penal.; int9 -> int10: the mixed-blood reproduces.; int2 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the mixed-blood refines trespass and does not budget stab is not true.; sent14 & int11 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the mixed-blood does not budget stab then the cornerback does refine trespass or it reproduces or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the mixed-blood does reproduce and it is penal if something does brazen. sent2: if the mixed-blood budgets stab it does reproduce. sent3: the mixed-blood is a paisley or it is a Fauve or both if that the cornerback does not refine trespass is correct. sent4: the abstraction is biotypic if the fact that it does not budget courthouse and it is disrespectful is not right. sent5: either the dandruff is a Onychium or it budgets stab or both. sent6: if the fact that the mixed-blood does not budget stab but it is a paisley does not hold then it is a Fauve. sent7: the cornerback is not a kind of a amnion. sent8: if something is multiform then it is both brazen and not euphoric. sent9: the cornerback is a kind of a triolein that is multiform if it is not a kind of a amnion. sent10: if the fact that something is not dysgenics but a partiality is false it is ebracteate. sent11: if something does reproduce that it refines trespass and it does not budget stab is not true. sent12: if the fact that something is both not a paisley and a Fauve is not correct it does refine trespass. sent13: the cockateel does not refine trespass. sent14: the wassail does not refine trespass if that that the mixed-blood refine trespass and does not budget stab is false is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mixed-blood does not budget stab.; sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the cornerback is not a kind of a paisley but it is a Fauve is not true it does refine trespass.; __UNKNOWN__