the racketeer is non-prewar thing that is Bayesian.
sent1: if that something is not a kind of a repentance but it is a Leicestershire does not hold then it is aphetic. sent2: the fact that the malingerer is both not a repentance and a Leicestershire is incorrect if the Calypso does not chomp extrovert. sent3: that the Calypso does not chomp extrovert is correct. sent4: if the malingerer is aphetic then the racketeer is both not prewar and Bayesian. sent5: the fact that everything is a blinded is right. sent6: That the extrovert does not chomp Calypso is correct. sent7: that the racketeer is not a repentance but Bayesian is wrong if the malingerer is not aphetic.
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the malingerer is not a repentance and is a kind of a Leicestershire does not hold.; sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the fact that the malingerer is not a kind of a repentance and is a kind of a Leicestershire does not hold is true it is aphetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the malingerer is aphetic.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the racketeer is not prewar but it is Bayesian is false.
sent5 -> int4: the malingerer does blind.;
$hypothesis$ = the racketeer is non-prewar thing that is Bayesian. ; $context$ = sent1: if that something is not a kind of a repentance but it is a Leicestershire does not hold then it is aphetic. sent2: the fact that the malingerer is both not a repentance and a Leicestershire is incorrect if the Calypso does not chomp extrovert. sent3: that the Calypso does not chomp extrovert is correct. sent4: if the malingerer is aphetic then the racketeer is both not prewar and Bayesian. sent5: the fact that everything is a blinded is right. sent6: That the extrovert does not chomp Calypso is correct. sent7: that the racketeer is not a repentance but Bayesian is wrong if the malingerer is not aphetic. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent3 -> int1: the fact that the malingerer is not a repentance and is a kind of a Leicestershire does not hold.; sent1 -> int2: if the fact that the fact that the malingerer is not a kind of a repentance and is a kind of a Leicestershire does not hold is true it is aphetic.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the malingerer is aphetic.; int3 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__