the rearward is a kind of a niqaabi.
sent1: the fact that the ascidian is a kind of Parthian thing that is Malay is not right. sent2: the rearward is not ossiferous. sent3: the oldwife is not monocarboxylic. sent4: if the fact that the oldwife is not monocarboxylic is true then it is not a kind of a anecdotist and debuts Swift. sent5: if the terrace is not bisectional but postganglionic then the oldwife is not postganglionic. sent6: if the oldwife is a anecdotist and it does debut Swift then the fact that it does perk is not incorrect. sent7: the oldwife is not a anecdotist if it is not monocarboxylic. sent8: if the oldwife does not debut Swift and is a kind of a niqaabi it is a anecdotist. sent9: the rearward is monocarboxylic. sent10: the oldwife does perk if it is not a kind of a anecdotist and debuts Swift. sent11: if there exists something such that it is postganglionic the rearward is a niqaabi. sent12: if there is something such that it perks and/or it is postganglionic the rearward is a kind of a niqaabi. sent13: the terrace is not bisectional if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Parthian that is Malay is not right.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the oldwife is not a kind of a anecdotist but it does debut Swift.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the oldwife does perk.; int2 -> int3: the oldwife either does perk or is postganglionic or both.; int3 -> int4: something perks and/or it is postganglionic.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
that the rearward is not a kind of a niqaabi is correct.
sent1 -> int5: there is something such that the fact that that it is a Parthian and Malay is correct is false.; int5 & sent13 -> int6: the terrace is not bisectional.;
$hypothesis$ = the rearward is a kind of a niqaabi. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the ascidian is a kind of Parthian thing that is Malay is not right. sent2: the rearward is not ossiferous. sent3: the oldwife is not monocarboxylic. sent4: if the fact that the oldwife is not monocarboxylic is true then it is not a kind of a anecdotist and debuts Swift. sent5: if the terrace is not bisectional but postganglionic then the oldwife is not postganglionic. sent6: if the oldwife is a anecdotist and it does debut Swift then the fact that it does perk is not incorrect. sent7: the oldwife is not a anecdotist if it is not monocarboxylic. sent8: if the oldwife does not debut Swift and is a kind of a niqaabi it is a anecdotist. sent9: the rearward is monocarboxylic. sent10: the oldwife does perk if it is not a kind of a anecdotist and debuts Swift. sent11: if there exists something such that it is postganglionic the rearward is a niqaabi. sent12: if there is something such that it perks and/or it is postganglionic the rearward is a kind of a niqaabi. sent13: the terrace is not bisectional if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a Parthian that is Malay is not right. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the oldwife is not a kind of a anecdotist but it does debut Swift.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the oldwife does perk.; int2 -> int3: the oldwife either does perk or is postganglionic or both.; int3 -> int4: something perks and/or it is postganglionic.; int4 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__