the porker is a ichthyology.
sent1: the sectional is pyloric if the rennet is philosophical but it does not disavow syncretism. sent2: if the sectional disavows syncretism then the rennet is not pyloric. sent3: if that the mystification disavows syncretism is correct the rennet disavows syncretism but it is not a vervet. sent4: if the lurker is a thermometry and it is pyloric the sectional is philosophical. sent5: if there is something such that it disavows syncretism and is not a kind of a thermometry the lurker is pyloric. sent6: that the mystification is not a kind of a vervet is not false. sent7: if there exists something such that it does drink age and it is not a vervet then the porker is a kind of a ichthyology. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not microelectronic hold then the lurker is a kind of a thermometry or it is a kind of a localism or both. sent9: if something that drinks age is a vervet the porker is a ichthyology. sent10: if that the mystification is philosophical is not incorrect then the gnat is philosophical but it does not drink age. sent11: there is something such that it is not microelectronic. sent12: the gnat is philosophical if there exists something such that it is a thermometry or it is a kind of a localism or both. sent13: the lurker is a vervet if there is something such that either it is pyloric or it is a thermometry or both. sent14: the mystification is not pyloric. sent15: the sectional is philosophical thing that is not pyloric if the gnat is philosophical. sent16: the fact that the mystification drinks age and is not a vervet if the rennet does disavow syncretism hold. sent17: the lurker does not drink age if the mystification is a localism. sent18: the rennet does disavow syncretism but it is not philosophical if the sectional disavow syncretism. sent19: the rennet disavows syncretism if the sectional is philosophical but not pyloric. sent20: if the rennet does disavow syncretism the fact that the mystification is not a kind of a vervet hold. sent21: if a microelectronic thing is a thermometry then that it is not a ichthyology is right. sent22: if the gnat is philosophical then the sectional is not pyloric. sent23: if something is a kind of a thermometry then the gnat is philosophical. sent24: if there are non-philosophical things the lurker is a thermometry or it is a ichthyology or both. sent25: there is something such that it is not philosophical.
sent11 & sent8 -> int1: the lurker is a thermometry or a localism or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a thermometry and/or it is a localism.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the gnat is philosophical.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the sectional is both philosophical and not pyloric is not false.; sent19 & int4 -> int5: the rennet does disavow syncretism.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the mystification drinks age but it is not a vervet.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does drink age and is not a kind of a vervet.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the porker is not a ichthyology.
sent21 -> int8: if the porker is a kind of microelectronic thing that is a thermometry that it is not a ichthyology is not false.;
$hypothesis$ = the porker is a ichthyology. ; $context$ = sent1: the sectional is pyloric if the rennet is philosophical but it does not disavow syncretism. sent2: if the sectional disavows syncretism then the rennet is not pyloric. sent3: if that the mystification disavows syncretism is correct the rennet disavows syncretism but it is not a vervet. sent4: if the lurker is a thermometry and it is pyloric the sectional is philosophical. sent5: if there is something such that it disavows syncretism and is not a kind of a thermometry the lurker is pyloric. sent6: that the mystification is not a kind of a vervet is not false. sent7: if there exists something such that it does drink age and it is not a vervet then the porker is a kind of a ichthyology. sent8: if there exists something such that that it is not microelectronic hold then the lurker is a kind of a thermometry or it is a kind of a localism or both. sent9: if something that drinks age is a vervet the porker is a ichthyology. sent10: if that the mystification is philosophical is not incorrect then the gnat is philosophical but it does not drink age. sent11: there is something such that it is not microelectronic. sent12: the gnat is philosophical if there exists something such that it is a thermometry or it is a kind of a localism or both. sent13: the lurker is a vervet if there is something such that either it is pyloric or it is a thermometry or both. sent14: the mystification is not pyloric. sent15: the sectional is philosophical thing that is not pyloric if the gnat is philosophical. sent16: the fact that the mystification drinks age and is not a vervet if the rennet does disavow syncretism hold. sent17: the lurker does not drink age if the mystification is a localism. sent18: the rennet does disavow syncretism but it is not philosophical if the sectional disavow syncretism. sent19: the rennet disavows syncretism if the sectional is philosophical but not pyloric. sent20: if the rennet does disavow syncretism the fact that the mystification is not a kind of a vervet hold. sent21: if a microelectronic thing is a thermometry then that it is not a ichthyology is right. sent22: if the gnat is philosophical then the sectional is not pyloric. sent23: if something is a kind of a thermometry then the gnat is philosophical. sent24: if there are non-philosophical things the lurker is a thermometry or it is a ichthyology or both. sent25: there is something such that it is not philosophical. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 & sent8 -> int1: the lurker is a thermometry or a localism or both.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is a thermometry and/or it is a localism.; int2 & sent12 -> int3: the gnat is philosophical.; sent15 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the sectional is both philosophical and not pyloric is not false.; sent19 & int4 -> int5: the rennet does disavow syncretism.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the mystification drinks age but it is not a vervet.; int6 -> int7: there is something such that it does drink age and is not a kind of a vervet.; int7 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__