the fact that there is something such that it does rap subjugator is incorrect.
sent1: the charity does not rap thromboplastin. sent2: if something does whore then it does not exsiccate diploid. sent3: the mistral exsiccates diploid. sent4: the fact that the charity is non-large but it does rap subjugator is false. sent5: if the charity whores it does not exsiccate diploid. sent6: something is big if the fact that it exsiccates diploid and it is not big is false. sent7: the mistral raps subjugator and does exsiccate diploid if that the charity does not exsiccate diploid is not wrong. sent8: if that something does not whore and is a large is false then it does not exsiccate diploid. sent9: that the charity does not whore but it is a large is incorrect if it does not rap thromboplastin. sent10: the mistral does exsiccate diploid if the charity does not exsiccate diploid. sent11: the fact that the charity whores and is large is false. sent12: The thromboplastin does not rap charity. sent13: if the charity does not rap thromboplastin the fact that it whores and it is a kind of a large is wrong. sent14: if the mistral is a kind of a barbiturate then the charity raps thromboplastin or it does not rap subjugator or both. sent15: if something does not rap thromboplastin then the fact that it does exsiccate diploid and is not big is incorrect.
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the charity does not whore and is a large is not right.; sent8 -> int2: if that the charity does not whore and is a large is not true it does not exsiccate diploid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the charity does not exsiccate diploid.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mistral raps subjugator and exsiccates diploid.; int4 -> int5: the mistral does rap subjugator.; int5 -> hypothesis;
the hammock is big.
sent6 -> int6: if the fact that the hammock exsiccates diploid but it is not big is not right then it is big.; sent15 -> int7: if the hammock does not rap thromboplastin then the fact that it exsiccates diploid and is not big is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that it does rap subjugator is incorrect. ; $context$ = sent1: the charity does not rap thromboplastin. sent2: if something does whore then it does not exsiccate diploid. sent3: the mistral exsiccates diploid. sent4: the fact that the charity is non-large but it does rap subjugator is false. sent5: if the charity whores it does not exsiccate diploid. sent6: something is big if the fact that it exsiccates diploid and it is not big is false. sent7: the mistral raps subjugator and does exsiccate diploid if that the charity does not exsiccate diploid is not wrong. sent8: if that something does not whore and is a large is false then it does not exsiccate diploid. sent9: that the charity does not whore but it is a large is incorrect if it does not rap thromboplastin. sent10: the mistral does exsiccate diploid if the charity does not exsiccate diploid. sent11: the fact that the charity whores and is large is false. sent12: The thromboplastin does not rap charity. sent13: if the charity does not rap thromboplastin the fact that it whores and it is a kind of a large is wrong. sent14: if the mistral is a kind of a barbiturate then the charity raps thromboplastin or it does not rap subjugator or both. sent15: if something does not rap thromboplastin then the fact that it does exsiccate diploid and is not big is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the fact that the charity does not whore and is a large is not right.; sent8 -> int2: if that the charity does not whore and is a large is not true it does not exsiccate diploid.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the charity does not exsiccate diploid.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the mistral raps subjugator and exsiccates diploid.; int4 -> int5: the mistral does rap subjugator.; int5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__