the shipping does queen robustness.
sent1: if the brougham is joyous the fact that the shipping is incorrigible is not incorrect. sent2: something that does not curry is not a kind of a coextension and is a astrogator. sent3: if something is not pituitary then it does queen robustness. sent4: that the brougham does not guarantee brougham and is a astrogator is not true. sent5: the brougham does not guarantee brougham but it is a astrogator if it is not joyous.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brougham is non-joyous.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the brougham does not guarantee brougham but it is a astrogator.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the brougham is not non-joyous.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the shipping is incorrigible.; int4 -> int5: the shipping is incorrigible and/or it is phreatic.; sent3 -> int6: the shipping does queen robustness if that it is not a kind of a pituitary is correct.;
the watercraft is not a coextension but a astrogator if it is not a curry.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the shipping does queen robustness. ; $context$ = sent1: if the brougham is joyous the fact that the shipping is incorrigible is not incorrect. sent2: something that does not curry is not a kind of a coextension and is a astrogator. sent3: if something is not pituitary then it does queen robustness. sent4: that the brougham does not guarantee brougham and is a astrogator is not true. sent5: the brougham does not guarantee brougham but it is a astrogator if it is not joyous. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the brougham is non-joyous.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the brougham does not guarantee brougham but it is a astrogator.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the brougham is not non-joyous.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: the shipping is incorrigible.; int4 -> int5: the shipping is incorrigible and/or it is phreatic.; sent3 -> int6: the shipping does queen robustness if that it is not a kind of a pituitary is correct.; __UNKNOWN__