the reprising serif does not occur.
sent1: if that both the reprising descriptivism and the non-caliconess occurs is not right then the reprising Mallon does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the poke happens but the broad does not occur is not right the coiling does not occur. sent3: the reprising serif does not occur if either the schismaticness or the ginning Trondheim or both happens. sent4: both the seguing and the staring sexist happens if the reprising Mallon does not occur. sent5: if the ringing does not occur the fact that the technology does not occur but the malpractice happens is not right. sent6: that the metrification does not occur and the disowning padding occurs is wrong if the fact that the reprising serif happens is false. sent7: if the fact that the metrification does not occur but the disowning padding occurs does not hold the ginning Trondheim happens. sent8: if the fact that the coil does not occur hold then the hematologicness does not occur but the bipolarness occurs. sent9: the schismaticness is triggered by that the segue occurs. sent10: if the hematologicness does not occur then the disowning childcare and the disowning immunodeficiency happens. sent11: the fact that the reprising descriptivism but not the calico occurs does not hold if the disowning childcare occurs. sent12: if the reprising serif does not occur then the fact that the metrification and the disowning padding happens is false. sent13: the sweat brings about that the palatineness happens or that the heroic does not occur or both. sent14: if the encasement happens that the fact that the poking and the non-broadness happens does not hold is true. sent15: the fact that both the metrification and the disowning padding occurs is incorrect. sent16: the sweating happens. sent17: the ectopicness happens. sent18: the ginning Trondheim does not occur. sent19: if the metrification occurs the ginning Trondheim happens. sent20: that the metamorphosing does not occur triggers that both the encasement and the diclinousness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reprising serif does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the metrification does not occur but the disowning padding happens does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ginning Trondheim happens.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
that the reprising serif does not occur is true.
sent13 & sent16 -> int4: the palatineness happens or the heroic does not occur or both.;
$hypothesis$ = the reprising serif does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if that both the reprising descriptivism and the non-caliconess occurs is not right then the reprising Mallon does not occur. sent2: if the fact that the poke happens but the broad does not occur is not right the coiling does not occur. sent3: the reprising serif does not occur if either the schismaticness or the ginning Trondheim or both happens. sent4: both the seguing and the staring sexist happens if the reprising Mallon does not occur. sent5: if the ringing does not occur the fact that the technology does not occur but the malpractice happens is not right. sent6: that the metrification does not occur and the disowning padding occurs is wrong if the fact that the reprising serif happens is false. sent7: if the fact that the metrification does not occur but the disowning padding occurs does not hold the ginning Trondheim happens. sent8: if the fact that the coil does not occur hold then the hematologicness does not occur but the bipolarness occurs. sent9: the schismaticness is triggered by that the segue occurs. sent10: if the hematologicness does not occur then the disowning childcare and the disowning immunodeficiency happens. sent11: the fact that the reprising descriptivism but not the calico occurs does not hold if the disowning childcare occurs. sent12: if the reprising serif does not occur then the fact that the metrification and the disowning padding happens is false. sent13: the sweat brings about that the palatineness happens or that the heroic does not occur or both. sent14: if the encasement happens that the fact that the poking and the non-broadness happens does not hold is true. sent15: the fact that both the metrification and the disowning padding occurs is incorrect. sent16: the sweating happens. sent17: the ectopicness happens. sent18: the ginning Trondheim does not occur. sent19: if the metrification occurs the ginning Trondheim happens. sent20: that the metamorphosing does not occur triggers that both the encasement and the diclinousness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the reprising serif does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the metrification does not occur but the disowning padding happens does not hold.; int1 & sent7 -> int2: the ginning Trondheim happens.; int2 & sent18 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__