the aerodynamicness prevents that the yips occurs.
sent1: the fact that not the avarice but the roller happens is not correct. sent2: the spraying occurs. sent3: if the yips and the aerodynamicness happens the shitwork does not occur. sent4: that the obsessing does not occur and the shitwork happens is incorrect. sent5: if the aerodynamicness happens then that the yips happens is not wrong. sent6: the non-aerodynamicness yields that not the reding avail but the yips occurs. sent7: that the obsessing does not occur and the shitwork does not occur does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yips occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the aerodynamicness occurs is correct.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the yips occurs and the aerodynamicness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the shitwork does not occur.;
the reding avail does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the aerodynamicness prevents that the yips occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that not the avarice but the roller happens is not correct. sent2: the spraying occurs. sent3: if the yips and the aerodynamicness happens the shitwork does not occur. sent4: that the obsessing does not occur and the shitwork happens is incorrect. sent5: if the aerodynamicness happens then that the yips happens is not wrong. sent6: the non-aerodynamicness yields that not the reding avail but the yips occurs. sent7: that the obsessing does not occur and the shitwork does not occur does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the yips occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the aerodynamicness occurs is correct.; assump1 & assump2 -> int1: the yips occurs and the aerodynamicness happens.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the shitwork does not occur.; __UNKNOWN__