the crustacean is a histologist.
sent1: the fact that the radial is not a gemma and compromises hank is not right. sent2: something is scarce and it is a kind of a latrine if it does not compromise Hirschsprung. sent3: something is not a patter and not a histologist. sent4: if the radial does compromise hank then the nuke is not a patter and is not transatlantic. sent5: the crustacean is a histologist if the fact that the ten-spot does not compromise hank and it is not a gemma is incorrect. sent6: something does compromise hank and is not thankless if it is a kind of a latrine. sent7: if the selvage is not transatlantic then the fact that the nuke is transatlantic and it does not compromise Hirschsprung is incorrect. sent8: the nuke is a gemma. sent9: the selvage does not compromise Hirschsprung and is not thankless. sent10: if the crustacean is a gemma the ten-spot is not a latrine and not a histologist. sent11: the nuke is not thankless if that the selvage is transatlantic is right. sent12: that if the ten-spot is not the histologist then the ten-spot does compromise hank is not false. sent13: the selvage is not a encephalogram. sent14: if the radial does not compromise hank then that the ten-spot does not compromise hank and it is not a gemma is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the radial does compromise hank is not incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the nuke is not a patter and is not transatlantic.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a patter and is not transatlantic.; sent2 -> int3: if the selvage does not compromise Hirschsprung then it is scarce and is a latrine.; sent9 -> int4: the selvage does not compromise Hirschsprung.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the selvage is scarce thing that is a latrine.; int5 -> int6: the selvage is a latrine.;
the triiodothyronine is not thankless.
sent6 -> int7: if the triiodothyronine is a kind of a latrine it does compromise hank and it is grateful.;
$hypothesis$ = the crustacean is a histologist. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the radial is not a gemma and compromises hank is not right. sent2: something is scarce and it is a kind of a latrine if it does not compromise Hirschsprung. sent3: something is not a patter and not a histologist. sent4: if the radial does compromise hank then the nuke is not a patter and is not transatlantic. sent5: the crustacean is a histologist if the fact that the ten-spot does not compromise hank and it is not a gemma is incorrect. sent6: something does compromise hank and is not thankless if it is a kind of a latrine. sent7: if the selvage is not transatlantic then the fact that the nuke is transatlantic and it does not compromise Hirschsprung is incorrect. sent8: the nuke is a gemma. sent9: the selvage does not compromise Hirschsprung and is not thankless. sent10: if the crustacean is a gemma the ten-spot is not a latrine and not a histologist. sent11: the nuke is not thankless if that the selvage is transatlantic is right. sent12: that if the ten-spot is not the histologist then the ten-spot does compromise hank is not false. sent13: the selvage is not a encephalogram. sent14: if the radial does not compromise hank then that the ten-spot does not compromise hank and it is not a gemma is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the radial does compromise hank is not incorrect.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the nuke is not a patter and is not transatlantic.; int1 -> int2: there is something such that it is not a patter and is not transatlantic.; sent2 -> int3: if the selvage does not compromise Hirschsprung then it is scarce and is a latrine.; sent9 -> int4: the selvage does not compromise Hirschsprung.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the selvage is scarce thing that is a latrine.; int5 -> int6: the selvage is a latrine.; __UNKNOWN__