the galbulus is a dearth.
sent1: the galbulus is not a dearth if the hiddenite revenges monoculture and it is a kind of a voicelessness. sent2: the Moron emblazons analogue but it is not a lastingness. sent3: everything does not revenge attack. sent4: the mammy is not a lastingness. sent5: if the Moron is not a kind of a lastingness and it is not a HCG the hiddenite is not a HCG. sent6: the fact that the sphenion either is not adoptive or is not epicyclic or both is wrong if it is not scarce. sent7: the mammy is not a kind of a lastingness if the schoolyard is a lastingness. sent8: the mammy is not a lastingness and does emblazon snuffer if the schoolyard is a lastingness. sent9: the Moron is a voicelessness if the hiddenite does revenge monoculture. sent10: if the hiddenite is not a dearth then the galbulus does revenge monoculture. sent11: something is not a kind of a HCG if it does not emblazon snuffer. sent12: the fact that the sphenion is not scarce is true. sent13: the galbulus is a dearth if the mammy is not a kind of a lastingness and does emblazon snuffer. sent14: if the Moron is not a voicelessness and emblazons snuffer then the mammy is a lastingness. sent15: if the mammy is a lastingness and it emblazons snuffer that the galbulus is a dearth is not false. sent16: if the hiddenite does not revenge monoculture then the sphenion is not a HCG. sent17: everything is not a voicelessness.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hiddenite does revenge monoculture hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Moron is a voicelessness.; sent17 -> int2: the Moron is not a kind of a voicelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hiddenite does not revenge monoculture.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the sphenion is not a kind of a HCG.;
the galbulus is not a dearth.
sent2 -> int6: the Moron is not a lastingness.; sent11 -> int7: if the Moron does not emblazon snuffer then it is not a kind of a HCG.; sent6 & sent12 -> int8: that the sphenion is not adoptive or is not epicyclic or both is not right.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is not adoptive and/or it is not epicyclic is false.;
$hypothesis$ = the galbulus is a dearth. ; $context$ = sent1: the galbulus is not a dearth if the hiddenite revenges monoculture and it is a kind of a voicelessness. sent2: the Moron emblazons analogue but it is not a lastingness. sent3: everything does not revenge attack. sent4: the mammy is not a lastingness. sent5: if the Moron is not a kind of a lastingness and it is not a HCG the hiddenite is not a HCG. sent6: the fact that the sphenion either is not adoptive or is not epicyclic or both is wrong if it is not scarce. sent7: the mammy is not a kind of a lastingness if the schoolyard is a lastingness. sent8: the mammy is not a lastingness and does emblazon snuffer if the schoolyard is a lastingness. sent9: the Moron is a voicelessness if the hiddenite does revenge monoculture. sent10: if the hiddenite is not a dearth then the galbulus does revenge monoculture. sent11: something is not a kind of a HCG if it does not emblazon snuffer. sent12: the fact that the sphenion is not scarce is true. sent13: the galbulus is a dearth if the mammy is not a kind of a lastingness and does emblazon snuffer. sent14: if the Moron is not a voicelessness and emblazons snuffer then the mammy is a lastingness. sent15: if the mammy is a lastingness and it emblazons snuffer that the galbulus is a dearth is not false. sent16: if the hiddenite does not revenge monoculture then the sphenion is not a HCG. sent17: everything is not a voicelessness. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the hiddenite does revenge monoculture hold.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Moron is a voicelessness.; sent17 -> int2: the Moron is not a kind of a voicelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the hiddenite does not revenge monoculture.; int4 & sent16 -> int5: the sphenion is not a kind of a HCG.; __UNKNOWN__