the Messiah is bronchoscopic.
sent1: the chondrite is a taxability if it is not a kind of a Fijian and is broadband. sent2: the fact that the greaser is not a lats and it is not vitreous is incorrect. sent3: the greaser hatches sterilization if that it is not a lats and is not vitreous is not right. sent4: if the shoot-'em-up does not clinch Vendemiaire the chondrite is not Fijian but broadband. sent5: the fact that something is informal hold if the fact that it is a taxability hold. sent6: something is both not a griminess and printable if it is informal. sent7: if the shoot-'em-up is a taxability the fact that the chondrite is printable and is not Fijian is not right. sent8: if the greaser does not clinch expedient the fact that the Messiah is a kind of formal thing that does not clinch expedient does not hold. sent9: if something is a Fijian and does hatch sterilization the chondrite is not a griminess. sent10: if the greaser is vitreous then it hatches sterilization. sent11: the shoot-'em-up is printable. sent12: the shoot-'em-up is a taxability. sent13: the chondrite is not a griminess if there exists something such that it clinches expedient and it does hatch sterilization. sent14: the greaser is informal. sent15: that the shoot-'em-up is not a lats hold. sent16: if something is not a griminess it is printable. sent17: if the greaser is not printable but a griminess the fact that the Messiah does not hatch sterilization is correct. sent18: that the Messiah is a kind of formal thing that clinches expedient is not right. sent19: that the chondrite is not printable is not false if that it is printable and it is not a kind of a Fijian does not hold.
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the greaser does hatch sterilization.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the greaser clinches expedient is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the greaser clinches expedient and hatches sterilization.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does clinch expedient and it hatches sterilization.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the chondrite is not a griminess.; sent16 -> int5: if the chondrite is not a griminess the fact that it is printable is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chondrite is printable.; sent7 & sent12 -> int7: that the chondrite is printable but it is non-Fijian is wrong.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the chondrite is not printable.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the greaser does not clinch expedient.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the fact that the Messiah is not informal and it does not clinch expedient is not right.;
the shortstop is vitreous.
sent6 -> int12: if the greaser is informal it is not a griminess and it is printable.; int12 & sent14 -> int13: the greaser is not a griminess but it is printable.; int13 -> int14: there is something such that it is not a kind of a griminess and it is printable.;
$hypothesis$ = the Messiah is bronchoscopic. ; $context$ = sent1: the chondrite is a taxability if it is not a kind of a Fijian and is broadband. sent2: the fact that the greaser is not a lats and it is not vitreous is incorrect. sent3: the greaser hatches sterilization if that it is not a lats and is not vitreous is not right. sent4: if the shoot-'em-up does not clinch Vendemiaire the chondrite is not Fijian but broadband. sent5: the fact that something is informal hold if the fact that it is a taxability hold. sent6: something is both not a griminess and printable if it is informal. sent7: if the shoot-'em-up is a taxability the fact that the chondrite is printable and is not Fijian is not right. sent8: if the greaser does not clinch expedient the fact that the Messiah is a kind of formal thing that does not clinch expedient does not hold. sent9: if something is a Fijian and does hatch sterilization the chondrite is not a griminess. sent10: if the greaser is vitreous then it hatches sterilization. sent11: the shoot-'em-up is printable. sent12: the shoot-'em-up is a taxability. sent13: the chondrite is not a griminess if there exists something such that it clinches expedient and it does hatch sterilization. sent14: the greaser is informal. sent15: that the shoot-'em-up is not a lats hold. sent16: if something is not a griminess it is printable. sent17: if the greaser is not printable but a griminess the fact that the Messiah does not hatch sterilization is correct. sent18: that the Messiah is a kind of formal thing that clinches expedient is not right. sent19: that the chondrite is not printable is not false if that it is printable and it is not a kind of a Fijian does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 & sent2 -> int1: the greaser does hatch sterilization.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the greaser clinches expedient is not incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the greaser clinches expedient and hatches sterilization.; int2 -> int3: there exists something such that it does clinch expedient and it hatches sterilization.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the chondrite is not a griminess.; sent16 -> int5: if the chondrite is not a griminess the fact that it is printable is not false.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the chondrite is printable.; sent7 & sent12 -> int7: that the chondrite is printable but it is non-Fijian is wrong.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the chondrite is not printable.; int6 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the greaser does not clinch expedient.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the fact that the Messiah is not informal and it does not clinch expedient is not right.; __UNKNOWN__