if the scotomatousness does not occur that the law happens and/or the guttering clipper does not occur is not right.
sent1: that the participating does not occur causes either the tasting Occidentalism or that the interest does not occur or both. sent2: the law does not occur. sent3: that the tasting Cardigan does not occur is right. sent4: the endometrialness happens or the trussing prolapse does not occur or both. sent5: that the trussing birthright happens and/or the sweeping does not occur does not hold if the pounce happens. sent6: both the pouncing and the scotomatousness happens if the tasting fool does not occur. sent7: that the scotomatousness does not occur prevents that the law happens. sent8: the encounter and/or the verbalness happens. sent9: the fact that either the law or the guttering clipper or both occurs is not right. sent10: the fact that the law and/or the guttering clipper occurs does not hold if the scotomatousness does not occur. sent11: if the trussing selsyn occurs the fumble but not the tasting fool happens. sent12: the guttering Scholastic occurs. sent13: that the law happens or the guttering clipper does not occur or both is caused by that the scotomatousness does not occur. sent14: that the law happens and/or the guttering clipper does not occur prevents that the scotomatousness does not occur. sent15: the endothermicness happens. sent16: the scotomatousness happens if the law happens and/or the guttering clipper occurs. sent17: the scotomatousness happens if that the law happens hold. sent18: the homologizing and/or the non-verbalness occurs if the synovialness does not occur. sent19: if not the tasting Argun but the foothold happens then the trussing selsyn happens. sent20: either the on-lineness happens or the bite does not occur or both. sent21: the guttering clipper does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the law happens or the guttering clipper does not occur or both.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the scotomatousness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scotomatousness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that either the law occurs or the guttering clipper does not occur or both is incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the trussing birthright occurs or the sweeping does not occur or both does not hold.
$hypothesis$ = if the scotomatousness does not occur that the law happens and/or the guttering clipper does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the participating does not occur causes either the tasting Occidentalism or that the interest does not occur or both. sent2: the law does not occur. sent3: that the tasting Cardigan does not occur is right. sent4: the endometrialness happens or the trussing prolapse does not occur or both. sent5: that the trussing birthright happens and/or the sweeping does not occur does not hold if the pounce happens. sent6: both the pouncing and the scotomatousness happens if the tasting fool does not occur. sent7: that the scotomatousness does not occur prevents that the law happens. sent8: the encounter and/or the verbalness happens. sent9: the fact that either the law or the guttering clipper or both occurs is not right. sent10: the fact that the law and/or the guttering clipper occurs does not hold if the scotomatousness does not occur. sent11: if the trussing selsyn occurs the fumble but not the tasting fool happens. sent12: the guttering Scholastic occurs. sent13: that the law happens or the guttering clipper does not occur or both is caused by that the scotomatousness does not occur. sent14: that the law happens and/or the guttering clipper does not occur prevents that the scotomatousness does not occur. sent15: the endothermicness happens. sent16: the scotomatousness happens if the law happens and/or the guttering clipper occurs. sent17: the scotomatousness happens if that the law happens hold. sent18: the homologizing and/or the non-verbalness occurs if the synovialness does not occur. sent19: if not the tasting Argun but the foothold happens then the trussing selsyn happens. sent20: either the on-lineness happens or the bite does not occur or both. sent21: the guttering clipper does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the law happens or the guttering clipper does not occur or both.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the scotomatousness happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the scotomatousness does not occur.; int1 & assump2 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the fact that either the law occurs or the guttering clipper does not occur or both is incorrect.; [assump2] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__