the pinche is not a kind of a Pandanaceae.
sent1: the savior devoices shim or it is a Geiger or both. sent2: if that the chipboard is not a Geiger and devoices shim does not hold it does not outsell Anhingidae. sent3: the fact that the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is a macrophage and it is not a kind of a Essene is not right. sent4: the chipboard is anastigmatic and/or it is not a recognizance. sent5: the ironside is anastigmatic and it is a requisiteness. sent6: the pinche is a Pandanaceae if either the savior does devoice shim or it is not a kind of a Geiger or both. sent7: the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic if the fact that something is not a macrophage is not false. sent8: if the darkness does not devoice shim then the savior does devoice shim or it is a Geiger or both. sent9: there is something such that that it is both a macrophage and not a Essene is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the chipboard is not a Geiger but it does devoice shim is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the litchi is a goal-kick and a recognizance is not false the chipboard does not cramp. sent12: if the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic then the litchi is a goal-kick and a recognizance. sent13: something that is myrmecophytic is both not a Custer and a macrophage. sent14: if the darkness does not devoice shim the savior devoice shim and/or it is not a Geiger. sent15: the fact that if the ironside does not outsell Anhingidae and is a requisiteness then that the darkness does not devoice shim is true is correct. sent16: something is non-anastigmatic if it does not cramp. sent17: something is not anastigmatic if the fact that it is anastigmatic and it is a requisiteness does not hold. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a goal-kick the fact that the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic but a recognizance is false. sent19: the litchi is either a Pandanaceae or a recognizance or both if the pinche is not a Pandanaceae. sent20: something is myrmecophytic and it is a recognizance if it is not a goal-kick. sent21: that the fact that the litchi is anastigmatic and it is a kind of a requisiteness is right is not correct if the fact that the chipboard does not outsell Anhingidae is right. sent22: if the chipboard is not anastigmatic then the ironside is a requisiteness. sent23: there exists something such that it is a macrophage and is not a kind of a Essene. sent24: if the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic then the litchi is a recognizance. sent25: the ironside is a requisiteness. sent26: the ironside does not outsell Anhingidae and is a requisiteness if the chipboard is not anastigmatic.
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the litchi is a goal-kick that is a recognizance.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the chipboard is not a kind of a cramp is true.; sent16 -> int4: the chipboard is not anastigmatic if it is not a cramp.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the chipboard is not anastigmatic is correct.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the ironside does not outsell Anhingidae but it is a requisiteness.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the darkness does not devoice shim.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the savior devoices shim and/or it is not a Geiger.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the pinche is not a Pandanaceae.
sent17 -> int9: the fact that the litchi is not anastigmatic is true if the fact that it is anastigmatic a requisiteness is not true.; sent2 & sent10 -> int10: the chipboard does not outsell Anhingidae.; sent21 & int10 -> int11: the fact that the litchi is anastigmatic and is a requisiteness is not correct.; int9 & int11 -> int12: the litchi is not anastigmatic.;
$hypothesis$ = the pinche is not a kind of a Pandanaceae. ; $context$ = sent1: the savior devoices shim or it is a Geiger or both. sent2: if that the chipboard is not a Geiger and devoices shim does not hold it does not outsell Anhingidae. sent3: the fact that the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic is not false if there exists something such that the fact that it is a macrophage and it is not a kind of a Essene is not right. sent4: the chipboard is anastigmatic and/or it is not a recognizance. sent5: the ironside is anastigmatic and it is a requisiteness. sent6: the pinche is a Pandanaceae if either the savior does devoice shim or it is not a kind of a Geiger or both. sent7: the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic if the fact that something is not a macrophage is not false. sent8: if the darkness does not devoice shim then the savior does devoice shim or it is a Geiger or both. sent9: there is something such that that it is both a macrophage and not a Essene is incorrect. sent10: the fact that the chipboard is not a Geiger but it does devoice shim is incorrect. sent11: if the fact that the litchi is a goal-kick and a recognizance is not false the chipboard does not cramp. sent12: if the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic then the litchi is a goal-kick and a recognizance. sent13: something that is myrmecophytic is both not a Custer and a macrophage. sent14: if the darkness does not devoice shim the savior devoice shim and/or it is not a Geiger. sent15: the fact that if the ironside does not outsell Anhingidae and is a requisiteness then that the darkness does not devoice shim is true is correct. sent16: something is non-anastigmatic if it does not cramp. sent17: something is not anastigmatic if the fact that it is anastigmatic and it is a requisiteness does not hold. sent18: if there exists something such that it is a goal-kick the fact that the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic but a recognizance is false. sent19: the litchi is either a Pandanaceae or a recognizance or both if the pinche is not a Pandanaceae. sent20: something is myrmecophytic and it is a recognizance if it is not a goal-kick. sent21: that the fact that the litchi is anastigmatic and it is a kind of a requisiteness is right is not correct if the fact that the chipboard does not outsell Anhingidae is right. sent22: if the chipboard is not anastigmatic then the ironside is a requisiteness. sent23: there exists something such that it is a macrophage and is not a kind of a Essene. sent24: if the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic then the litchi is a recognizance. sent25: the ironside is a requisiteness. sent26: the ironside does not outsell Anhingidae and is a requisiteness if the chipboard is not anastigmatic. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent3 -> int1: the scrutineer is not myrmecophytic.; int1 & sent12 -> int2: the litchi is a goal-kick that is a recognizance.; int2 & sent11 -> int3: that the chipboard is not a kind of a cramp is true.; sent16 -> int4: the chipboard is not anastigmatic if it is not a cramp.; int3 & int4 -> int5: that the chipboard is not anastigmatic is correct.; int5 & sent26 -> int6: the ironside does not outsell Anhingidae but it is a requisiteness.; int6 & sent15 -> int7: the darkness does not devoice shim.; int7 & sent14 -> int8: the savior devoices shim and/or it is not a Geiger.; int8 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__