that the associateship happens is correct.
sent1: if the treadmill does not occur and the vitality does not occur then the collaboration does not occur. sent2: if the pocket and the bridling occurs the smothering does not occur. sent3: that the degeneration does not occur yields that the crispening does not occur. sent4: that both the bridle and the papillariness occurs is brought about by that the embodiment does not occur. sent5: if both the collaboration and the raise happens then the vitality does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the glomming wash-and-wear and/or the degeneration happens is not true then that the anthropometry does not occur hold. sent7: if the treadmill does not occur that that the associateship and the vitality occurs is not wrong is not correct. sent8: the anthropometry happens and the raising happens. sent9: that the collaboration does not occur results in that the cuckoldry and the raising happens. sent10: the degeneration does not occur. sent11: not the treadmill but the crispening occurs if the anthropometry does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur is not true then the associateship does not occur. sent13: the chopper does not occur and the complecting Mallotus does not occur. sent14: that the collaboration occurs is caused by that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur. sent15: if the fact that both the embodiment and the monotypicness occurs does not hold then the embodiment does not occur. sent16: the vitality happens and the treadmill happens if the crispening does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the chopper does not occur and the complecting Mallotus does not occur is not false then the pocket occurs. sent18: the anthropometry happens if the degeneration occurs. sent19: if the disinfestation does not occur then that the embodiment happens and the monotypicness occurs is wrong. sent20: if the smothering does not occur the fact that the glomming wash-and-wear or the degeneration or both occurs is false.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the collaboration occurs.; sent8 -> int2: the raise happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the collaboration and the raise occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the vitality does not occur.; sent3 & sent10 -> int5: the crispening does not occur.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the vitality occurs and the treadmill happens.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the vitality happens is true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur is false.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis;
the associateship happens.
$hypothesis$ = that the associateship happens is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the treadmill does not occur and the vitality does not occur then the collaboration does not occur. sent2: if the pocket and the bridling occurs the smothering does not occur. sent3: that the degeneration does not occur yields that the crispening does not occur. sent4: that both the bridle and the papillariness occurs is brought about by that the embodiment does not occur. sent5: if both the collaboration and the raise happens then the vitality does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the glomming wash-and-wear and/or the degeneration happens is not true then that the anthropometry does not occur hold. sent7: if the treadmill does not occur that that the associateship and the vitality occurs is not wrong is not correct. sent8: the anthropometry happens and the raising happens. sent9: that the collaboration does not occur results in that the cuckoldry and the raising happens. sent10: the degeneration does not occur. sent11: not the treadmill but the crispening occurs if the anthropometry does not occur. sent12: if the fact that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur is not true then the associateship does not occur. sent13: the chopper does not occur and the complecting Mallotus does not occur. sent14: that the collaboration occurs is caused by that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur. sent15: if the fact that both the embodiment and the monotypicness occurs does not hold then the embodiment does not occur. sent16: the vitality happens and the treadmill happens if the crispening does not occur. sent17: if the fact that the chopper does not occur and the complecting Mallotus does not occur is not false then the pocket occurs. sent18: the anthropometry happens if the degeneration occurs. sent19: if the disinfestation does not occur then that the embodiment happens and the monotypicness occurs is wrong. sent20: if the smothering does not occur the fact that the glomming wash-and-wear or the degeneration or both occurs is false. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur.; sent14 & assump1 -> int1: the collaboration occurs.; sent8 -> int2: the raise happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: both the collaboration and the raise occurs.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the vitality does not occur.; sent3 & sent10 -> int5: the crispening does not occur.; sent16 & int5 -> int6: the vitality occurs and the treadmill happens.; int6 -> int7: the fact that the vitality happens is true.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the fact that the complecting thinker does not occur and the sterilization does not occur is false.; int9 & sent12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__