the carpetbag is a misuse.
sent1: the fact that the skinhead is not three-wheel and not a Rankin is incorrect. sent2: if something is not allogamous but arenicolous then it is a misuse. sent3: if the leaf is a skibob then the orpiment lulls Veratrum. sent4: either the overshoe is not non-arenicolous or it is a trestle or both if something is a foreclosure. sent5: the leaf is a skibob if it is a misuse. sent6: that the retainer is arenicolous hold if the overshoe is a trestle. sent7: the leaf is both a logician and cytogenetic. sent8: the leaf is a kind of arenicolous thing that does abjure suction. sent9: the fact that the retainer is not the gallfly if that the retainer preserves quoit and/or it does lull concretism is false is not false. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is non-three-wheel thing that is not a Rankin hold is not true the fact that the turret does not abjure starlet is right. sent11: something is allogamous if it is not a kind of a gallfly. sent12: something is cytogenetic and it is a skibob if it does not lull Veratrum. sent13: there exists something such that it is a foreclosure. sent14: if the overshoe is arenicolous the retainer is arenicolous. sent15: that the fact that the retainer preserves quoit and/or it does lull concretism is right is wrong if the turret does not abjure starlet. sent16: if the leaf is a logician it is a skibob. sent17: the carpetbag is non-allogamous thing that is arenicolous if the orpiment lulls Veratrum.
sent7 -> int1: the leaf is a logician.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the leaf is a skibob.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the orpiment lulls Veratrum.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the carpetbag is non-allogamous thing that is arenicolous.; sent2 -> int5: the carpetbag is a misuse if it is non-allogamous thing that is arenicolous.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis;
the carpetbag is not a misuse.
sent12 -> int6: the orpiment is a kind of cytogenetic a skibob if it does not lull Veratrum.; sent11 -> int7: if the retainer is not a kind of a gallfly then it is allogamous.; sent1 -> int8: the fact that there is something such that that it is both not three-wheel and not a Rankin is not correct is not wrong.; int8 & sent10 -> int9: the turret does not abjure starlet.; sent15 & int9 -> int10: the fact that the retainer does preserve quoit and/or it lulls concretism is incorrect.; sent9 & int10 -> int11: the retainer is not a gallfly.; int7 & int11 -> int12: the retainer is allogamous.; sent13 & sent4 -> int13: the overshoe is arenicolous or is a trestle or both.; int13 & sent14 & sent6 -> int14: the retainer is arenicolous.; int12 & int14 -> int15: the retainer is allogamous and it is arenicolous.; int15 -> int16: there exists something such that it is allogamous and it is arenicolous.;
$hypothesis$ = the carpetbag is a misuse. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the skinhead is not three-wheel and not a Rankin is incorrect. sent2: if something is not allogamous but arenicolous then it is a misuse. sent3: if the leaf is a skibob then the orpiment lulls Veratrum. sent4: either the overshoe is not non-arenicolous or it is a trestle or both if something is a foreclosure. sent5: the leaf is a skibob if it is a misuse. sent6: that the retainer is arenicolous hold if the overshoe is a trestle. sent7: the leaf is both a logician and cytogenetic. sent8: the leaf is a kind of arenicolous thing that does abjure suction. sent9: the fact that the retainer is not the gallfly if that the retainer preserves quoit and/or it does lull concretism is false is not false. sent10: if there exists something such that the fact that that it is non-three-wheel thing that is not a Rankin hold is not true the fact that the turret does not abjure starlet is right. sent11: something is allogamous if it is not a kind of a gallfly. sent12: something is cytogenetic and it is a skibob if it does not lull Veratrum. sent13: there exists something such that it is a foreclosure. sent14: if the overshoe is arenicolous the retainer is arenicolous. sent15: that the fact that the retainer preserves quoit and/or it does lull concretism is right is wrong if the turret does not abjure starlet. sent16: if the leaf is a logician it is a skibob. sent17: the carpetbag is non-allogamous thing that is arenicolous if the orpiment lulls Veratrum. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the leaf is a logician.; int1 & sent16 -> int2: the leaf is a skibob.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the orpiment lulls Veratrum.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the carpetbag is non-allogamous thing that is arenicolous.; sent2 -> int5: the carpetbag is a misuse if it is non-allogamous thing that is arenicolous.; int4 & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__