the Tamil is not a kind of an enlightenment.
sent1: the demitasse is not a kind of an enlightenment. sent2: that the fact that the ascendant refers gasp but it is not a Medicare is not true hold. sent3: that the Tamil is both an enlightenment and not unrestrictive is not true if it is not a kind of a carafe. sent4: if the Tamil is not medical then that it is an enlightenment and it is not a Medicare does not hold. sent5: the Tamil is a kind of an advance. sent6: if the Liverpudlian is not an enlightenment then the fact that it sheathes OIS and is non-sensory is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the Tamil is an enlightenment and is not unimodal is not right. sent8: the Tamil is not a Karelian. sent9: the fact that the Tamil is a kind of an enlightenment that is not occipital is false. sent10: that the Tamil is maxillodental but it is not a kind of a Medicare is false. sent11: if the impairer is not a bursa then the fact that it is a Medicare and it is not nonexploratory is not correct. sent12: the fact that the Tamil is not a Prussian is right. sent13: the fact that the Tamil is not medical is not incorrect. sent14: the hilum is not a Medicare. sent15: the Tamil is not a Medicare. sent16: if the proliferation is not a trigger then that it is a ETF and it is not a Medicare is not true. sent17: the Tamil is not celebratory.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tamil is an enlightenment.; assump1 & sent15 -> int1: the Tamil is an enlightenment and not a Medicare.; sent4 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the Tamil is an enlightenment and is not a Medicare is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Tamil is not a kind of an enlightenment. ; $context$ = sent1: the demitasse is not a kind of an enlightenment. sent2: that the fact that the ascendant refers gasp but it is not a Medicare is not true hold. sent3: that the Tamil is both an enlightenment and not unrestrictive is not true if it is not a kind of a carafe. sent4: if the Tamil is not medical then that it is an enlightenment and it is not a Medicare does not hold. sent5: the Tamil is a kind of an advance. sent6: if the Liverpudlian is not an enlightenment then the fact that it sheathes OIS and is non-sensory is incorrect. sent7: the fact that the Tamil is an enlightenment and is not unimodal is not right. sent8: the Tamil is not a Karelian. sent9: the fact that the Tamil is a kind of an enlightenment that is not occipital is false. sent10: that the Tamil is maxillodental but it is not a kind of a Medicare is false. sent11: if the impairer is not a bursa then the fact that it is a Medicare and it is not nonexploratory is not correct. sent12: the fact that the Tamil is not a Prussian is right. sent13: the fact that the Tamil is not medical is not incorrect. sent14: the hilum is not a Medicare. sent15: the Tamil is not a Medicare. sent16: if the proliferation is not a trigger then that it is a ETF and it is not a Medicare is not true. sent17: the Tamil is not celebratory. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Tamil is an enlightenment.; assump1 & sent15 -> int1: the Tamil is an enlightenment and not a Medicare.; sent4 & sent13 -> int2: the fact that the Tamil is an enlightenment and is not a Medicare is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__