the fact that the pouch does not occur is correct.
sent1: the Rhenishness but not the covering quotient happens. sent2: the fact that the caucusing ICE does not occur is correct if the muff happens. sent3: the bonging does not occur. sent4: that the infusion but not the bisection happens is wrong if that the rings occurs is not incorrect. sent5: if the infusion does not occur the inadvisableness happens and the covering tailrace does not occur. sent6: the depravity does not occur. sent7: the usury occurs and the interest happens. sent8: the anabioticness happens. sent9: that the usury does not occur and the interest does not occur brings about the Chippendale. sent10: if that both the protrusiveness and the non-bubalineness happens does not hold the protrusiveness does not occur. sent11: if the deepness happens then that the disposable happens but the receding does not occur is incorrect. sent12: the interest happens. sent13: the deepness happens. sent14: if either the usury happens or the attention happens or both the Californian does not occur. sent15: the admeasuring plenipotentiary does not occur if the axileness does not occur. sent16: the headstand happens. sent17: that the inadvisableness occurs and the cork occurs prevents that the pouching happens. sent18: the sexism does not occur if the fact that the sexism happens but the nullification does not occur does not hold. sent19: that the infusion does not occur hold if that the infusion but not the bisection happens does not hold. sent20: if the Californian does not occur then the fact that the corking happens is true. sent21: the rings occurs.
sent7 -> int1: the usury happens.; int1 -> int2: the usury happens and/or the attention occurs.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Californian does not occur.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the corking occurs.; sent4 & sent21 -> int5: that the infusion happens but the bisection does not occur does not hold.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: that the infusion does not occur is not false.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the inadvisableness but not the covering tailrace happens is correct.; int7 -> int8: the inadvisableness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: both the inadvisableness and the corking occurs.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis;
the serialization happens and/or the Chippendale happens.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pouch does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Rhenishness but not the covering quotient happens. sent2: the fact that the caucusing ICE does not occur is correct if the muff happens. sent3: the bonging does not occur. sent4: that the infusion but not the bisection happens is wrong if that the rings occurs is not incorrect. sent5: if the infusion does not occur the inadvisableness happens and the covering tailrace does not occur. sent6: the depravity does not occur. sent7: the usury occurs and the interest happens. sent8: the anabioticness happens. sent9: that the usury does not occur and the interest does not occur brings about the Chippendale. sent10: if that both the protrusiveness and the non-bubalineness happens does not hold the protrusiveness does not occur. sent11: if the deepness happens then that the disposable happens but the receding does not occur is incorrect. sent12: the interest happens. sent13: the deepness happens. sent14: if either the usury happens or the attention happens or both the Californian does not occur. sent15: the admeasuring plenipotentiary does not occur if the axileness does not occur. sent16: the headstand happens. sent17: that the inadvisableness occurs and the cork occurs prevents that the pouching happens. sent18: the sexism does not occur if the fact that the sexism happens but the nullification does not occur does not hold. sent19: that the infusion does not occur hold if that the infusion but not the bisection happens does not hold. sent20: if the Californian does not occur then the fact that the corking happens is true. sent21: the rings occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: the usury happens.; int1 -> int2: the usury happens and/or the attention occurs.; int2 & sent14 -> int3: the Californian does not occur.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the corking occurs.; sent4 & sent21 -> int5: that the infusion happens but the bisection does not occur does not hold.; sent19 & int5 -> int6: that the infusion does not occur is not false.; sent5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the inadvisableness but not the covering tailrace happens is correct.; int7 -> int8: the inadvisableness occurs.; int4 & int8 -> int9: both the inadvisableness and the corking occurs.; int9 & sent17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__