the boomeranging happens.
sent1: both the non-field-cropness and the murmuring Gilgamesh happens if the Hero happens. sent2: the non-scalableness triggers the murmuring surfacing. sent3: that the jobbing but not the tenseness happens is not correct if the unawareness happens. sent4: if the fact that the miniaturization does not occur and the Baptisticness happens is not true the dependentness does not occur. sent5: if the unawareness occurs then that the jobbing happens hold. sent6: that both the Baptisticness and the miniaturization happens triggers that the scalableness does not occur. sent7: the tensing occurs. sent8: that the boomeranging does not occur hold if the miniaturization does not occur. sent9: the Baptisticness occurs. sent10: the unawareness happens if the field-cropness does not occur and the murmuring Gilgamesh occurs. sent11: if that not the miniaturization but the Baptisticness occurs is not correct then that the boomeranging occurs is correct. sent12: that the tenseness occurs is prevented by that both the murmuring surfacing and the taming serology occurs. sent13: if the unawareness does not occur then the job and the taming serology occurs. sent14: the unawareness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miniaturization occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: both the Baptisticness and the miniaturization occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the scalableness does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the murmuring surfacing happens.; sent13 & sent14 -> int4: the job occurs and the taming serology occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the taming serology happens hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the murmuring surfacing happens and the taming serology occurs.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the tensing does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the miniaturization does not occur.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
the dependentness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the boomeranging happens. ; $context$ = sent1: both the non-field-cropness and the murmuring Gilgamesh happens if the Hero happens. sent2: the non-scalableness triggers the murmuring surfacing. sent3: that the jobbing but not the tenseness happens is not correct if the unawareness happens. sent4: if the fact that the miniaturization does not occur and the Baptisticness happens is not true the dependentness does not occur. sent5: if the unawareness occurs then that the jobbing happens hold. sent6: that both the Baptisticness and the miniaturization happens triggers that the scalableness does not occur. sent7: the tensing occurs. sent8: that the boomeranging does not occur hold if the miniaturization does not occur. sent9: the Baptisticness occurs. sent10: the unawareness happens if the field-cropness does not occur and the murmuring Gilgamesh occurs. sent11: if that not the miniaturization but the Baptisticness occurs is not correct then that the boomeranging occurs is correct. sent12: that the tenseness occurs is prevented by that both the murmuring surfacing and the taming serology occurs. sent13: if the unawareness does not occur then the job and the taming serology occurs. sent14: the unawareness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the miniaturization occurs.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: both the Baptisticness and the miniaturization occurs.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the fact that the scalableness does not occur is correct.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the murmuring surfacing happens.; sent13 & sent14 -> int4: the job occurs and the taming serology occurs.; int4 -> int5: the fact that the taming serology happens hold.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the murmuring surfacing happens and the taming serology occurs.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the tensing does not occur.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the miniaturization does not occur.; int9 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__