that the abbot is a phototherapy and it is a locomotive is not correct.
sent1: the Omaha is both not a roux and a conserve. sent2: something is a locomotive if it does occidentalize Bassia. sent3: if the cautery is not a mayapple the fact that either the sipunculid does not occidentalize Bassia or it is not wet or both is not correct. sent4: if the Neosporin is not a roux then the Omaha does occidentalize Roman. sent5: the sipunculid does not wet if the fact that it is a kind of wet thing that does not occidentalize Bassia is not correct. sent6: the refreshment is not a Felis and it is not a kind of a centriole. sent7: if something is hyperthermal then it is not a kind of a mayapple and/or it is not bacteriological. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a centriole the Neosporin is not a conserve. sent9: if the abbot is not a mayapple then the sipunculid is a kind of a mayapple and it is bacteriological. sent10: the abbot is not a locomotive if the cautery does not occidentalize Bassia. sent11: there is something such that it conserves. sent12: if the abbot is not wet it occidentalizes Bassia. sent13: that the cautery does occidentalize Roman and is hyperthermal is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is both wet and not a mayapple is not correct then it occidentalizes Bassia. sent15: if that something occidentalizes Roman is not false then it is hyperthermal. sent16: the fact that something is a phototherapy and it is a kind of a locomotive is not correct if it does not wet. sent17: something is introversive if it is a kind of a psychopomp. sent18: if the Neosporin does not conserve then it either is not a roux or does not occidentalize Roman or both. sent19: if the fact that the cautery occidentalizes Roman and it is hyperthermal does not hold then the sipunculid is not bacteriological. sent20: the abbot is a phototherapy if something that is not a roux conserves. sent21: the abbot is wet. sent22: the Omaha is not a roux. sent23: the abbot is non-wet if the fact that the sipunculid does not occidentalize Bassia or is not non-wet or both does not hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abbot is wet but it is not a mayapple.; assump1 -> int1: the abbot is not a kind of a mayapple.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the sipunculid is a kind of a mayapple and it is bacteriological.; int2 -> int3: the sipunculid is bacteriological.; sent19 & sent13 -> int4: that the sipunculid is not bacteriological is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fact that the abbot is a kind of wet thing that is not a mayapple is true does not hold.; sent14 -> int7: the abbot does occidentalize Bassia if the fact that it is wet but not a mayapple is false.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the abbot does occidentalize Bassia.; sent2 -> int9: the abbot is a locomotive if it occidentalizes Bassia.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the abbot is a locomotive.; sent1 -> int11: something is not a roux but it conserves.; int11 & sent20 -> int12: the abbot is a phototherapy.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the abbot is a phototherapy and is locomotive is not right.
$hypothesis$ = that the abbot is a phototherapy and it is a locomotive is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: the Omaha is both not a roux and a conserve. sent2: something is a locomotive if it does occidentalize Bassia. sent3: if the cautery is not a mayapple the fact that either the sipunculid does not occidentalize Bassia or it is not wet or both is not correct. sent4: if the Neosporin is not a roux then the Omaha does occidentalize Roman. sent5: the sipunculid does not wet if the fact that it is a kind of wet thing that does not occidentalize Bassia is not correct. sent6: the refreshment is not a Felis and it is not a kind of a centriole. sent7: if something is hyperthermal then it is not a kind of a mayapple and/or it is not bacteriological. sent8: if there is something such that it is not a kind of a centriole the Neosporin is not a conserve. sent9: if the abbot is not a mayapple then the sipunculid is a kind of a mayapple and it is bacteriological. sent10: the abbot is not a locomotive if the cautery does not occidentalize Bassia. sent11: there is something such that it conserves. sent12: if the abbot is not wet it occidentalizes Bassia. sent13: that the cautery does occidentalize Roman and is hyperthermal is wrong. sent14: if the fact that something is both wet and not a mayapple is not correct then it occidentalizes Bassia. sent15: if that something occidentalizes Roman is not false then it is hyperthermal. sent16: the fact that something is a phototherapy and it is a kind of a locomotive is not correct if it does not wet. sent17: something is introversive if it is a kind of a psychopomp. sent18: if the Neosporin does not conserve then it either is not a roux or does not occidentalize Roman or both. sent19: if the fact that the cautery occidentalizes Roman and it is hyperthermal does not hold then the sipunculid is not bacteriological. sent20: the abbot is a phototherapy if something that is not a roux conserves. sent21: the abbot is wet. sent22: the Omaha is not a roux. sent23: the abbot is non-wet if the fact that the sipunculid does not occidentalize Bassia or is not non-wet or both does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the abbot is wet but it is not a mayapple.; assump1 -> int1: the abbot is not a kind of a mayapple.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the sipunculid is a kind of a mayapple and it is bacteriological.; int2 -> int3: the sipunculid is bacteriological.; sent19 & sent13 -> int4: that the sipunculid is not bacteriological is not incorrect.; int3 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: that the fact that the abbot is a kind of wet thing that is not a mayapple is true does not hold.; sent14 -> int7: the abbot does occidentalize Bassia if the fact that it is wet but not a mayapple is false.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the abbot does occidentalize Bassia.; sent2 -> int9: the abbot is a locomotive if it occidentalizes Bassia.; int8 & int9 -> int10: the abbot is a locomotive.; sent1 -> int11: something is not a roux but it conserves.; int11 & sent20 -> int12: the abbot is a phototherapy.; int10 & int12 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__