the unstrapping gracefulness occurs.
sent1: the TLC does not occur if that the TLC happens and the homonymicness occurs is incorrect. sent2: the meteor does not occur if that the hexadecimalness occurs and the meteor occurs is incorrect. sent3: the tipping happens if the transaction happens. sent4: if the neurectomy happens then the fact that the nonimitativeness does not occur and/or the rerunning malevolence does not occur is not true. sent5: the fact that the extricableness does not occur is not false if the wharfing does not occur. sent6: if the TLC does not occur then the flotation happens and the neurectomy occurs. sent7: if the saltiness does not occur then the fact that the TLC and the homonymicness occurs is incorrect. sent8: the hexadecimalness occurs. sent9: the con does not occur if that the stream does not occur and/or the rerunning chlorofluorocarbon happens is wrong. sent10: the tipping does not occur if the fact that the generousness and the tipping occurs is wrong. sent11: the unstrapping gracefulness happens if the transaction does not occur but the meteor occurs. sent12: the wharfing does not occur if that the nonimitativeness does not occur or the rerunning malevolence does not occur or both is not true. sent13: the non-hexadecimalness is prevented by that the parricide does not occur. sent14: if the extricableness does not occur the parricide happens and the ungenerousness occurs. sent15: if the con does not occur then the creation does not occur and the illegalness does not occur. sent16: the ableism happens if the fact that the transaction does not occur and the tipping does not occur does not hold. sent17: if the parricide occurs the unstrapping gracefulness does not occur. sent18: that the vociferating occurs but the possessiveness does not occur is brought about by the non-illegalness. sent19: that both the non-ungenerousness and the tip happens is incorrect. sent20: the parricide does not occur. sent21: that both the vociferating and the non-possessiveness happens triggers the non-saltiness. sent22: that if the parricide does not occur the meteor and the hexadecimalness happens hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transaction occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tipping occurs.; sent10 & sent19 -> int2: the tip does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the transaction does not occur.; sent22 & sent20 -> int5: the meteor occurs and the hexadecimalness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the meteor happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: not the transaction but the meteor happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the ableism occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the unstrapping gracefulness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the TLC does not occur if that the TLC happens and the homonymicness occurs is incorrect. sent2: the meteor does not occur if that the hexadecimalness occurs and the meteor occurs is incorrect. sent3: the tipping happens if the transaction happens. sent4: if the neurectomy happens then the fact that the nonimitativeness does not occur and/or the rerunning malevolence does not occur is not true. sent5: the fact that the extricableness does not occur is not false if the wharfing does not occur. sent6: if the TLC does not occur then the flotation happens and the neurectomy occurs. sent7: if the saltiness does not occur then the fact that the TLC and the homonymicness occurs is incorrect. sent8: the hexadecimalness occurs. sent9: the con does not occur if that the stream does not occur and/or the rerunning chlorofluorocarbon happens is wrong. sent10: the tipping does not occur if the fact that the generousness and the tipping occurs is wrong. sent11: the unstrapping gracefulness happens if the transaction does not occur but the meteor occurs. sent12: the wharfing does not occur if that the nonimitativeness does not occur or the rerunning malevolence does not occur or both is not true. sent13: the non-hexadecimalness is prevented by that the parricide does not occur. sent14: if the extricableness does not occur the parricide happens and the ungenerousness occurs. sent15: if the con does not occur then the creation does not occur and the illegalness does not occur. sent16: the ableism happens if the fact that the transaction does not occur and the tipping does not occur does not hold. sent17: if the parricide occurs the unstrapping gracefulness does not occur. sent18: that the vociferating occurs but the possessiveness does not occur is brought about by the non-illegalness. sent19: that both the non-ungenerousness and the tip happens is incorrect. sent20: the parricide does not occur. sent21: that both the vociferating and the non-possessiveness happens triggers the non-saltiness. sent22: that if the parricide does not occur the meteor and the hexadecimalness happens hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transaction occurs.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the tipping occurs.; sent10 & sent19 -> int2: the tip does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the transaction does not occur.; sent22 & sent20 -> int5: the meteor occurs and the hexadecimalness occurs.; int5 -> int6: the meteor happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: not the transaction but the meteor happens.; int7 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__