both the sneer and the non-Sarawakianness happens.
sent1: if the whaling happens that both the destaining convent and the non-comparativeness happens is false. sent2: that the creak happens is prevented by that the filibuster happens and the reimbursing orderer occurs. sent3: the welding lumpsucker does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the magnification does not occur and the scanning occurs is false then the moonshine does not occur. sent5: the censor occurs. sent6: that the collapsibleness does not occur hold. sent7: the protrusiveness and the censor occurs if the welding lumpsucker does not occur. sent8: the fact that both the sneering and the non-Sarawakianness happens does not hold if the fact that the filibustering does not occur is not false. sent9: if the creak happens the fact that the sneering does not occur and the filibuster does not occur is not correct. sent10: the magnification does not occur. sent11: the non-pyrecticness causes that the Sarawakian does not occur and the reimbursing orderer happens. sent12: the sneering happens if that the fact that the sneering does not occur and the filibuster does not occur is not wrong is not right. sent13: if the reimbursing orderer does not occur both the sneering and the filibustering happens. sent14: if that the destaining convent but not the comparative occurs is not correct then the reimbursing torr does not occur. sent15: the creak and the protrusiveness occurs if the reimbursing torr does not occur. sent16: the reimbursing orderer happens. sent17: the fact that that both the posting and the approachableness happens is right is incorrect if the softening does not occur. sent18: the destaining tapeworm happens and the reimbursing bid happens if the posting does not occur. sent19: the portrayal and the reimbursing downiness occurs. sent20: the fact that the magnification does not occur but the scanning occurs is incorrect if the reimbursing bid occurs. sent21: that the questing occurs is prevented by either the non-minorsness or that the involution does not occur or both. sent22: that the creak does not occur or the pyrecticness does not occur or both prevents the protrusiveness. sent23: both the idiographicness and the ordinariness happens. sent24: if that both the posting and the non-unapproachableness happens does not hold the posting does not occur. sent25: that not the welding lumpsucker but the censor happens is caused by that the moonshine does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the filibustering happens is right.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: both the filibuster and the reimbursing orderer occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the creak does not occur.; int2 -> int3: either the creak does not occur or the pyrecticness does not occur or both.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the protrusiveness does not occur.; sent7 & sent3 -> int5: both the protrusiveness and the censor happens.; int5 -> int6: the protrusiveness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the filibuster does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis;
both the sneer and the non-Sarawakianness happens.
$hypothesis$ = both the sneer and the non-Sarawakianness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if the whaling happens that both the destaining convent and the non-comparativeness happens is false. sent2: that the creak happens is prevented by that the filibuster happens and the reimbursing orderer occurs. sent3: the welding lumpsucker does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the magnification does not occur and the scanning occurs is false then the moonshine does not occur. sent5: the censor occurs. sent6: that the collapsibleness does not occur hold. sent7: the protrusiveness and the censor occurs if the welding lumpsucker does not occur. sent8: the fact that both the sneering and the non-Sarawakianness happens does not hold if the fact that the filibustering does not occur is not false. sent9: if the creak happens the fact that the sneering does not occur and the filibuster does not occur is not correct. sent10: the magnification does not occur. sent11: the non-pyrecticness causes that the Sarawakian does not occur and the reimbursing orderer happens. sent12: the sneering happens if that the fact that the sneering does not occur and the filibuster does not occur is not wrong is not right. sent13: if the reimbursing orderer does not occur both the sneering and the filibustering happens. sent14: if that the destaining convent but not the comparative occurs is not correct then the reimbursing torr does not occur. sent15: the creak and the protrusiveness occurs if the reimbursing torr does not occur. sent16: the reimbursing orderer happens. sent17: the fact that that both the posting and the approachableness happens is right is incorrect if the softening does not occur. sent18: the destaining tapeworm happens and the reimbursing bid happens if the posting does not occur. sent19: the portrayal and the reimbursing downiness occurs. sent20: the fact that the magnification does not occur but the scanning occurs is incorrect if the reimbursing bid occurs. sent21: that the questing occurs is prevented by either the non-minorsness or that the involution does not occur or both. sent22: that the creak does not occur or the pyrecticness does not occur or both prevents the protrusiveness. sent23: both the idiographicness and the ordinariness happens. sent24: if that both the posting and the non-unapproachableness happens does not hold the posting does not occur. sent25: that not the welding lumpsucker but the censor happens is caused by that the moonshine does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the filibustering happens is right.; assump1 & sent16 -> int1: both the filibuster and the reimbursing orderer occurs.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the creak does not occur.; int2 -> int3: either the creak does not occur or the pyrecticness does not occur or both.; int3 & sent22 -> int4: the protrusiveness does not occur.; sent7 & sent3 -> int5: both the protrusiveness and the censor happens.; int5 -> int6: the protrusiveness happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int7 -> int8: the filibuster does not occur.; int8 & sent8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__