the fact that there is something such that if it is nonreciprocal it is a Shua and is not a kind of a pamperer is true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Tlingit it is distal and it is not argillaceous. sent2: something is Ephesians and not legible if it is intradepartmental. sent3: the rubberneck is intradepartmental and is not a Shua if it does droop. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a vandyke then the fact that it is both distal and not acanthotic is right. sent5: if the horsefly does droop then that it is technophobic and not a pamperer is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it is nonreciprocal it is not a pamperer. sent7: the tragacanth is unfriendly but it is not changeable if it does charter. sent8: the ratchet is a Shua but it is not a pamperer if it is nonreciprocal. sent9: there is something such that if it is distal it does lord and it does not Simonize meson. sent10: if the ratchet is disciplinary it is a IFC that is not a pamperer. sent11: there is something such that if it does heat funicle it is a lithotomy and is not a Bulgarian. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is nonreciprocal hold it is a Shua and it is a pamperer. sent13: there exists something such that if it is nonreciprocal it is a kind of a Shua. sent14: the meson is a kind of a Shua but it is not a league if it is a theologian. sent15: there is something such that if it lunches mandatary then it is a kind of a equerry and it is not insular. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a sale it is not a guenon. sent17: something is acanthotic but not Burundi if it is unfriendly. sent18: the ratchet is not a pamperer if it is nonreciprocal. sent19: if the ratchet lunches Bren it is both a pamperer and not scalene. sent20: if that the ratchet does heat clinic is not incorrect it is a pamperer.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
the pearlite is acanthotic but it is not a kind of a Burundi if it is unfriendly.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is nonreciprocal it is a Shua and is not a kind of a pamperer is true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is a Tlingit it is distal and it is not argillaceous. sent2: something is Ephesians and not legible if it is intradepartmental. sent3: the rubberneck is intradepartmental and is not a Shua if it does droop. sent4: there exists something such that if it is a kind of a vandyke then the fact that it is both distal and not acanthotic is right. sent5: if the horsefly does droop then that it is technophobic and not a pamperer is true. sent6: there exists something such that if it is nonreciprocal it is not a pamperer. sent7: the tragacanth is unfriendly but it is not changeable if it does charter. sent8: the ratchet is a Shua but it is not a pamperer if it is nonreciprocal. sent9: there is something such that if it is distal it does lord and it does not Simonize meson. sent10: if the ratchet is disciplinary it is a IFC that is not a pamperer. sent11: there is something such that if it does heat funicle it is a lithotomy and is not a Bulgarian. sent12: there exists something such that if that it is nonreciprocal hold it is a Shua and it is a pamperer. sent13: there exists something such that if it is nonreciprocal it is a kind of a Shua. sent14: the meson is a kind of a Shua but it is not a league if it is a theologian. sent15: there is something such that if it lunches mandatary then it is a kind of a equerry and it is not insular. sent16: there exists something such that if it is a sale it is not a guenon. sent17: something is acanthotic but not Burundi if it is unfriendly. sent18: the ratchet is not a pamperer if it is nonreciprocal. sent19: if the ratchet lunches Bren it is both a pamperer and not scalene. sent20: if that the ratchet does heat clinic is not incorrect it is a pamperer. ; $proof$ = 
sent8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__