the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does bungle and reclines plat is false is false.
sent1: the grade is not soft if something ensconces Chilomycterus and is a quantifiability. sent2: the cookstove is a quantifiability. sent3: the kickstand is a Cotonou. sent4: the fact that the grade is scorbutic and it does recline gain does not hold if it does not bungle. sent5: the kickstand is not a momism and is a mineral. sent6: the hyperon is a nonequivalence. sent7: something reclines gain. sent8: the grade is not a nonequivalence if there is something such that it is a kind of a quantifiability and it reclines plat. sent9: the kickstand is a metric if it fishes hideousness. sent10: if something is a metric then it is a quantifiability. sent11: the grade does not recline gain but it bungles. sent12: the grade aberrates. sent13: the grade does not recline plat but it does recline gain if it is a Cotonou. sent14: if something is scorbutic and is a quantifiability then the fact that the grade does not recline gain hold. sent15: there is something such that that it is nonastringent and it is a wicket-keeper is not right. sent16: that the kickstand is not a nonequivalence is true. sent17: something is a quantifiability. sent18: the kickstand is not a nonequivalence if it is a kind of a Cotonou. sent19: that something does bungle and reclines plat is wrong if it is not scorbutic. sent20: there is something such that it does bungle and reclines plat. sent21: if something does recline gain and it is a quantifiability then the grade is not scorbutic. sent22: the kickstand is Hmong. sent23: the fact that the kickstand is not a nonequivalence and reclines gain is correct if it is a Cotonou. sent24: The hideousness fishes kickstand. sent25: the kickstand fishes hideousness.
sent9 & sent25 -> int1: the kickstand is a metric.; sent10 -> int2: the kickstand is a kind of a quantifiability if it is metric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kickstand is a quantifiability.; sent23 & sent3 -> int4: the kickstand is not a kind of a nonequivalence but it does recline gain.; int4 -> int5: the kickstand reclines gain.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the kickstand reclines gain and is a quantifiability.; int6 -> int7: something does recline gain and it is a quantifiability.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the grade is not scorbutic.; sent19 -> int9: the fact that the grade bungles and does recline plat does not hold if it is not scorbutic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the grade does bungle and it does recline plat is false.; int10 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there exists something such that the fact that it does bungle and reclines plat is false is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the grade is not soft if something ensconces Chilomycterus and is a quantifiability. sent2: the cookstove is a quantifiability. sent3: the kickstand is a Cotonou. sent4: the fact that the grade is scorbutic and it does recline gain does not hold if it does not bungle. sent5: the kickstand is not a momism and is a mineral. sent6: the hyperon is a nonequivalence. sent7: something reclines gain. sent8: the grade is not a nonequivalence if there is something such that it is a kind of a quantifiability and it reclines plat. sent9: the kickstand is a metric if it fishes hideousness. sent10: if something is a metric then it is a quantifiability. sent11: the grade does not recline gain but it bungles. sent12: the grade aberrates. sent13: the grade does not recline plat but it does recline gain if it is a Cotonou. sent14: if something is scorbutic and is a quantifiability then the fact that the grade does not recline gain hold. sent15: there is something such that that it is nonastringent and it is a wicket-keeper is not right. sent16: that the kickstand is not a nonequivalence is true. sent17: something is a quantifiability. sent18: the kickstand is not a nonequivalence if it is a kind of a Cotonou. sent19: that something does bungle and reclines plat is wrong if it is not scorbutic. sent20: there is something such that it does bungle and reclines plat. sent21: if something does recline gain and it is a quantifiability then the grade is not scorbutic. sent22: the kickstand is Hmong. sent23: the fact that the kickstand is not a nonequivalence and reclines gain is correct if it is a Cotonou. sent24: The hideousness fishes kickstand. sent25: the kickstand fishes hideousness. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent25 -> int1: the kickstand is a metric.; sent10 -> int2: the kickstand is a kind of a quantifiability if it is metric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the kickstand is a quantifiability.; sent23 & sent3 -> int4: the kickstand is not a kind of a nonequivalence but it does recline gain.; int4 -> int5: the kickstand reclines gain.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the kickstand reclines gain and is a quantifiability.; int6 -> int7: something does recline gain and it is a quantifiability.; int7 & sent21 -> int8: the grade is not scorbutic.; sent19 -> int9: the fact that the grade bungles and does recline plat does not hold if it is not scorbutic.; int8 & int9 -> int10: that the grade does bungle and it does recline plat is false.; int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__