the pyroscope does steel succulence and it is a kind of a sannyasi.
sent1: that the vest is a kind of a crinkleroot is not wrong if the classic is a Telugu. sent2: if something does crawl that it is a Telugu is not wrong. sent3: that something is not a Telugu or it is a crinkleroot or both does not hold if it is a patter. sent4: the pyroscope steels succulence. sent5: the pursuer is not a hydrogel and is a kind of a Carolingian. sent6: the pursuer is not a kind of a hydrogel. sent7: the fact that the sketch is not a kind of a murderer and it is not low-tech is wrong if it crawls. sent8: there exists something such that that it is a ticktock and is not entozoic is not true. sent9: if the pursuer is a hydrogel that is a Carolingian then the sketch is a murderer. sent10: the classic crawls if there is something such that it is a murderer and/or is not non-low-tech. sent11: if the vest does not corrode then the fact that it does not tamp balkiness and is unmalicious is not correct. sent12: if that something is not a Telugu or a crinkleroot or both is incorrect it is a crawl. sent13: that the pyroscope does steel succulence is correct if the vest does not tamp balkiness. sent14: if there is something such that that it is not a murderer and it is not low-tech is not correct the pursuer is not a sannyasi. sent15: the sketch is a murderer if the pursuer is not a kind of a hydrogel but it is Carolingian. sent16: the pyroscope steels succulence and it is a sannyasi if the vest does not tamp balkiness. sent17: if there is something such that that it is a ticktock and is non-entozoic does not hold the vest does not corrode. sent18: the sketch is a kind of a patter if the classic does patter. sent19: something does not tamp balkiness if it does patter. sent20: if there exists something such that it is low-tech the fact that the classic is a crawl is correct. sent21: the vest does not tamp balkiness if it is a patter.
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the sketch is a murderer.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the sketch is a kind of a murderer or it is low-tech or both is not incorrect.; int2 -> int3: something is either a murderer or low-tech or both.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the classic is a crawl.; sent2 -> int5: if the classic is a kind of a crawl it is a Telugu.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the classic is a Telugu.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the vest is a crinkleroot.; int7 -> int8: the vest is a patter or it is a crinkleroot or both.;
that the pyroscope does steel succulence and it is a sannyasi does not hold.
sent12 -> int9: if the fact that either the sketch is not a Telugu or it is a crinkleroot or both is not true it is a kind of a crawl.; sent3 -> int10: if the sketch is a patter the fact that it is not a Telugu or is a crinkleroot or both is not right.; sent8 & sent17 -> int11: that the vest does not corrode is not false.; sent11 & int11 -> int12: that the vest does not tamp balkiness but it is unmalicious does not hold.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that that it does not tamp balkiness and it is unmalicious does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the pyroscope does steel succulence and it is a kind of a sannyasi. ; $context$ = sent1: that the vest is a kind of a crinkleroot is not wrong if the classic is a Telugu. sent2: if something does crawl that it is a Telugu is not wrong. sent3: that something is not a Telugu or it is a crinkleroot or both does not hold if it is a patter. sent4: the pyroscope steels succulence. sent5: the pursuer is not a hydrogel and is a kind of a Carolingian. sent6: the pursuer is not a kind of a hydrogel. sent7: the fact that the sketch is not a kind of a murderer and it is not low-tech is wrong if it crawls. sent8: there exists something such that that it is a ticktock and is not entozoic is not true. sent9: if the pursuer is a hydrogel that is a Carolingian then the sketch is a murderer. sent10: the classic crawls if there is something such that it is a murderer and/or is not non-low-tech. sent11: if the vest does not corrode then the fact that it does not tamp balkiness and is unmalicious is not correct. sent12: if that something is not a Telugu or a crinkleroot or both is incorrect it is a crawl. sent13: that the pyroscope does steel succulence is correct if the vest does not tamp balkiness. sent14: if there is something such that that it is not a murderer and it is not low-tech is not correct the pursuer is not a sannyasi. sent15: the sketch is a murderer if the pursuer is not a kind of a hydrogel but it is Carolingian. sent16: the pyroscope steels succulence and it is a sannyasi if the vest does not tamp balkiness. sent17: if there is something such that that it is a ticktock and is non-entozoic does not hold the vest does not corrode. sent18: the sketch is a kind of a patter if the classic does patter. sent19: something does not tamp balkiness if it does patter. sent20: if there exists something such that it is low-tech the fact that the classic is a crawl is correct. sent21: the vest does not tamp balkiness if it is a patter. ; $proof$ = 
sent15 & sent5 -> int1: the sketch is a murderer.; int1 -> int2: the fact that the sketch is a kind of a murderer or it is low-tech or both is not incorrect.; int2 -> int3: something is either a murderer or low-tech or both.; int3 & sent10 -> int4: the classic is a crawl.; sent2 -> int5: if the classic is a kind of a crawl it is a Telugu.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the classic is a Telugu.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the vest is a crinkleroot.; int7 -> int8: the vest is a patter or it is a crinkleroot or both.; __UNKNOWN__