the antibacterial is not unavailable.
sent1: either the desertification does organize easement or it does not freckle uncheerfulness or both. sent2: the insomniac is not a kind of a yellowbird but it is not non-informational. sent3: the acerola does organize easement. sent4: something that organizes easement is a kind of an accelerometer. sent5: the antibacterial is not unavailable if the acerola is a kind of non-ambulacral thing that is an accelerometer. sent6: if the acerola is not a blink it is not ambulacral. sent7: the griddle does not freckle uncheerfulness. sent8: if something is ambulacral then the fact that it does not freckle uncheerfulness and is a kind of an accelerometer is not correct. sent9: the fact that the afghan is not a kind of an accelerometer is not false if that the antibacterial does not freckle uncheerfulness but it is an accelerometer does not hold. sent10: if something is not a blink then it is not ambulacral. sent11: The uncheerfulness does not freckle griddle. sent12: if the griddle does not freckle uncheerfulness then that the acerola is a blink and it is usual does not hold. sent13: The easement does organize acerola. sent14: something is not ambulacral if that it blinks and it is usual is wrong.
sent14 -> int1: if that the acerola is a kind of a blink and it is usual does not hold it is not ambulacral.; sent12 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the acerola is a blink and usual is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the acerola is not ambulacral.; sent4 -> int4: if the acerola organizes easement then it is an accelerometer.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the acerola is an accelerometer.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the acerola is non-ambulacral but it is a kind of an accelerometer.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis;
the afghan is not unavailable but it is a sphenoid.
sent8 -> int7: if the griddle is ambulacral that it does not freckle uncheerfulness and it is an accelerometer is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the antibacterial is not unavailable. ; $context$ = sent1: either the desertification does organize easement or it does not freckle uncheerfulness or both. sent2: the insomniac is not a kind of a yellowbird but it is not non-informational. sent3: the acerola does organize easement. sent4: something that organizes easement is a kind of an accelerometer. sent5: the antibacterial is not unavailable if the acerola is a kind of non-ambulacral thing that is an accelerometer. sent6: if the acerola is not a blink it is not ambulacral. sent7: the griddle does not freckle uncheerfulness. sent8: if something is ambulacral then the fact that it does not freckle uncheerfulness and is a kind of an accelerometer is not correct. sent9: the fact that the afghan is not a kind of an accelerometer is not false if that the antibacterial does not freckle uncheerfulness but it is an accelerometer does not hold. sent10: if something is not a blink then it is not ambulacral. sent11: The uncheerfulness does not freckle griddle. sent12: if the griddle does not freckle uncheerfulness then that the acerola is a blink and it is usual does not hold. sent13: The easement does organize acerola. sent14: something is not ambulacral if that it blinks and it is usual is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 -> int1: if that the acerola is a kind of a blink and it is usual does not hold it is not ambulacral.; sent12 & sent7 -> int2: the fact that the acerola is a blink and usual is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the acerola is not ambulacral.; sent4 -> int4: if the acerola organizes easement then it is an accelerometer.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: the acerola is an accelerometer.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the acerola is non-ambulacral but it is a kind of an accelerometer.; int6 & sent5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__