the timeserver does not slake but it does unionize solvability.
sent1: if something does not clink loon then it does press. sent2: that the molybdenum does not unionize solvability is correct if that the PPLO is a kind of a Boccaccio but it does not clink loon is not true. sent3: the fact that the PPLO does clink loon and is uncorrected is false. sent4: the timeserver does not slake but it unionizes solvability if the molybdenum does not unionizes solvability. sent5: something clinks loon if it does not correct. sent6: the fact that the timeserver is unsavory and does not unionize solvability does not hold if the libration unionize solvability. sent7: the fact that the timeserver does not slake but it unionizes solvability is not right if there exists something such that it does not clink loon. sent8: that the PPLO is a kind of a Boccaccio but it does not clink loon is not true if the libration does clink loon. sent9: the libration does not correct if the fact that it is unsavory thing that is heteroecious is incorrect. sent10: if the libration is not heteroecious then it is not corrected. sent11: that the libration is both not savory and heteroecious is wrong.
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the libration is not corrected.; sent5 -> int2: if that the libration does not correct is correct it clinks loon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the libration clinks loon.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the PPLO is a Boccaccio but it does not clink loon is false.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the molybdenum does not unionize solvability.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
that the timeserver does not slake and unionizes solvability is false.
$hypothesis$ = the timeserver does not slake but it does unionize solvability. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does not clink loon then it does press. sent2: that the molybdenum does not unionize solvability is correct if that the PPLO is a kind of a Boccaccio but it does not clink loon is not true. sent3: the fact that the PPLO does clink loon and is uncorrected is false. sent4: the timeserver does not slake but it unionizes solvability if the molybdenum does not unionizes solvability. sent5: something clinks loon if it does not correct. sent6: the fact that the timeserver is unsavory and does not unionize solvability does not hold if the libration unionize solvability. sent7: the fact that the timeserver does not slake but it unionizes solvability is not right if there exists something such that it does not clink loon. sent8: that the PPLO is a kind of a Boccaccio but it does not clink loon is not true if the libration does clink loon. sent9: the libration does not correct if the fact that it is unsavory thing that is heteroecious is incorrect. sent10: if the libration is not heteroecious then it is not corrected. sent11: that the libration is both not savory and heteroecious is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent11 -> int1: the libration is not corrected.; sent5 -> int2: if that the libration does not correct is correct it clinks loon.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the libration clinks loon.; int3 & sent8 -> int4: that the PPLO is a Boccaccio but it does not clink loon is false.; int4 & sent2 -> int5: the molybdenum does not unionize solvability.; int5 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__