the devices does not occur.
sent1: if the marathon occurs the roping Galeorhinus occurs. sent2: if the fact that the glaring bicycle-built-for-two happens does not hold either the glaring square-rigger happens or the Avestanness happens or both. sent3: if the fact that the roping Galeorhinus happens is correct the roping taxonomist occurs. sent4: if the down-bow occurs the placebo occurs. sent5: the frail occurs and/or the meaningfulness happens. sent6: that the grievance does not occur hold if the riding does not occur. sent7: the luff occurs if the proselytizing happens. sent8: the glaring Araneae occurs. sent9: the roping taxonomist does not occur. sent10: if the roping Beta does not occur the evening happens and/or the cyanobacterialness happens. sent11: the Glaswegianness brings about that the semanticness happens. sent12: if the roping Volkhov does not occur then either the decontamination happens or the straining happens or both. sent13: if the rotating occurs then the representing occurs. sent14: that the geminating realist does not occur is right. sent15: the roping taxonomist or the roping Galeorhinus or both occurs if the fact that the grievance does not occur hold. sent16: the cachinnating happens if the fitting occurs. sent17: the unfriendliness occurs. sent18: the cyanobacterialness happens. sent19: if the high-energiness occurs the fact that the roping Galeorhinus happens hold. sent20: that the devices does not occur leads to that the marathon occurs or that the high-energiness happens or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the devices does not occur.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the marathon or the high-energiness or both happens.; int1 & sent1 & sent19 -> int2: the roping Galeorhinus happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the roping taxonomist happens.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
that the devices does not occur is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the devices does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marathon occurs the roping Galeorhinus occurs. sent2: if the fact that the glaring bicycle-built-for-two happens does not hold either the glaring square-rigger happens or the Avestanness happens or both. sent3: if the fact that the roping Galeorhinus happens is correct the roping taxonomist occurs. sent4: if the down-bow occurs the placebo occurs. sent5: the frail occurs and/or the meaningfulness happens. sent6: that the grievance does not occur hold if the riding does not occur. sent7: the luff occurs if the proselytizing happens. sent8: the glaring Araneae occurs. sent9: the roping taxonomist does not occur. sent10: if the roping Beta does not occur the evening happens and/or the cyanobacterialness happens. sent11: the Glaswegianness brings about that the semanticness happens. sent12: if the roping Volkhov does not occur then either the decontamination happens or the straining happens or both. sent13: if the rotating occurs then the representing occurs. sent14: that the geminating realist does not occur is right. sent15: the roping taxonomist or the roping Galeorhinus or both occurs if the fact that the grievance does not occur hold. sent16: the cachinnating happens if the fitting occurs. sent17: the unfriendliness occurs. sent18: the cyanobacterialness happens. sent19: if the high-energiness occurs the fact that the roping Galeorhinus happens hold. sent20: that the devices does not occur leads to that the marathon occurs or that the high-energiness happens or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the devices does not occur.; sent20 & assump1 -> int1: the marathon or the high-energiness or both happens.; int1 & sent1 & sent19 -> int2: the roping Galeorhinus happens.; int2 & sent3 -> int3: the roping taxonomist happens.; int3 & sent9 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__