the fact that the ward-heeler is a hypodermic hold.
sent1: if something that does not girdle Tenniel is hypodermic it is not a semitrance. sent2: the ward-heeler is a semitrance if there exists something such that it does not reconvert. sent3: the Shah is a wingman. sent4: if something counterpoints it is a kind of a letterhead. sent5: the fact that something girdles Akhbari and is postglacial is incorrect if it is not a semitrance. sent6: if the stanhope is a hypodermic and it girdles Tenniel then the ward-heeler is not a hypodermic. sent7: the stanhope is a hyssop or it is not shut or both if it is a kind of a wingman. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it girdles damper and it is civil is not right. sent9: if something girdles damper it scuffs tailrace. sent10: that the damper is a backswimmer and does reconvert is false. sent11: if a Koine is not dangerous then it is not a kind of a Gheg. sent12: the firebrick reconverts. sent13: if the Shah is a wingman then the stanhope is a wingman. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a backswimmer and it does reconvert. sent15: something does not girdle Tenniel but it is a hypodermic if it is not a Gheg. sent16: if the ward-heeler is a semitrance it is a backswimmer. sent17: the ward-heeler is a semitrance if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a backswimmer and it reconverts is not true. sent18: there exists something such that that it is allotropic thing that is reliable is not correct. sent19: the ward-heeler is a Koine but it is not dangerous if it is shut.
sent10 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a backswimmer and it does reconvert is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the ward-heeler is a semitrance.;
the ward-heeler is not a kind of a hypodermic.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the ward-heeler is a hypodermic hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if something that does not girdle Tenniel is hypodermic it is not a semitrance. sent2: the ward-heeler is a semitrance if there exists something such that it does not reconvert. sent3: the Shah is a wingman. sent4: if something counterpoints it is a kind of a letterhead. sent5: the fact that something girdles Akhbari and is postglacial is incorrect if it is not a semitrance. sent6: if the stanhope is a hypodermic and it girdles Tenniel then the ward-heeler is not a hypodermic. sent7: the stanhope is a hyssop or it is not shut or both if it is a kind of a wingman. sent8: there is something such that the fact that it girdles damper and it is civil is not right. sent9: if something girdles damper it scuffs tailrace. sent10: that the damper is a backswimmer and does reconvert is false. sent11: if a Koine is not dangerous then it is not a kind of a Gheg. sent12: the firebrick reconverts. sent13: if the Shah is a wingman then the stanhope is a wingman. sent14: there exists something such that it is a kind of a backswimmer and it does reconvert. sent15: something does not girdle Tenniel but it is a hypodermic if it is not a Gheg. sent16: if the ward-heeler is a semitrance it is a backswimmer. sent17: the ward-heeler is a semitrance if there exists something such that the fact that it is a kind of a backswimmer and it reconverts is not true. sent18: there exists something such that that it is allotropic thing that is reliable is not correct. sent19: the ward-heeler is a Koine but it is not dangerous if it is shut. ; $proof$ = 
sent10 -> int1: there is something such that the fact that it is a backswimmer and it does reconvert is incorrect.; int1 & sent17 -> int2: the ward-heeler is a semitrance.; __UNKNOWN__