there exists something such that if it does not acquaint elm then it is a scalar and insane.
sent1: the boomerang is a Boann if the fact that it does not acquaint boned is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not staple streamer it is anthropic. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not benefit it acquaints leveret. sent4: if the fact that the boomerang is not a scalar hold it is a prothrombin. sent5: the boomerang is micrometeoric a unselfconsciousness if it is a scalar. sent6: there is something such that if it is non-Jeffersonian then the fact that it does adjourn hold. sent7: the elm is both not apologetic and dicotyledonous if that it is not non-scalar is correct. sent8: there is something such that if it is a Pelobatidae it is a rainstorm and it is a hyponym. sent9: something that does not acquaint elm is a scalar and insane.
sent9 -> int1: the boomerang is a kind of a scalar and it is insane if it does not acquaint elm.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does not acquaint elm then it is a scalar and insane. ; $context$ = sent1: the boomerang is a Boann if the fact that it does not acquaint boned is right. sent2: there exists something such that if it does not staple streamer it is anthropic. sent3: there exists something such that if it does not benefit it acquaints leveret. sent4: if the fact that the boomerang is not a scalar hold it is a prothrombin. sent5: the boomerang is micrometeoric a unselfconsciousness if it is a scalar. sent6: there is something such that if it is non-Jeffersonian then the fact that it does adjourn hold. sent7: the elm is both not apologetic and dicotyledonous if that it is not non-scalar is correct. sent8: there is something such that if it is a Pelobatidae it is a rainstorm and it is a hyponym. sent9: something that does not acquaint elm is a scalar and insane. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 -> int1: the boomerang is a kind of a scalar and it is insane if it does not acquaint elm.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__