the azurite is a stopover.
sent1: that the hibachi is both a bigoted and a stopover is incorrect. sent2: if there exists something such that it is insentient the hibachi is a bigoted. sent3: something is a kind of a bacchanal but it is not a bigoted. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a bacchanal and it is not a bigoted is not right then the azurite is a stopover. sent5: if something is not a cardamom the fact that it is a bacchanal and a bigoted is not correct. sent6: the fact that the hibachi is a bacchanal and a bigoted does not hold if it is not a kind of a cardamom. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a bacchanal and is a stopover is incorrect. sent8: that something is a bacchanal and is not a kind of a bigoted does not hold if it is not a kind of a cardamom. sent9: there is something such that that it is a bacchanal and a bigoted is not right. sent10: the hibachi is a stopover. sent11: the fact that the azurite is a kind of extrospective thing that is a bigoted is not true if it does not teethe. sent12: that something is a stopover that is a kind of a bigoted is incorrect if it is not insentient. sent13: if that the hibachi is a squint but it is sentient does not hold it is not a cardamom. sent14: that the hibachi is a bacchanal and is a bigoted is not correct. sent15: the fact that the azurite squints but it is not a kind of a stopover is not right. sent16: the azurite is a stopover if there is something such that it is a bigoted. sent17: if something does not squint the fact that it is a stopover and insentient is not true. sent18: the fact that the hibachi does squint and it is insentient is not true. sent19: the azurite is not a kind of a squint. sent20: the fact that the azurite is a kind of chemotherapeutic thing that is Pavlovian does not hold. sent21: that the hibachi is both a squint and not insentient is not true. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is insentient and it squints is false. sent23: the azurite is not a Trinidadian.
sent13 & sent21 -> int1: the hibachi is not a cardamom.; sent8 -> int2: if the hibachi is not a cardamom then that it is a kind of a bacchanal and is not a kind of a bigoted does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the hibachi is a bacchanal and not a bigoted does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a bacchanal and it is not a kind of a bigoted is not right.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the azurite is a stopover. ; $context$ = sent1: that the hibachi is both a bigoted and a stopover is incorrect. sent2: if there exists something such that it is insentient the hibachi is a bigoted. sent3: something is a kind of a bacchanal but it is not a bigoted. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a bacchanal and it is not a bigoted is not right then the azurite is a stopover. sent5: if something is not a cardamom the fact that it is a bacchanal and a bigoted is not correct. sent6: the fact that the hibachi is a bacchanal and a bigoted does not hold if it is not a kind of a cardamom. sent7: there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a bacchanal and is a stopover is incorrect. sent8: that something is a bacchanal and is not a kind of a bigoted does not hold if it is not a kind of a cardamom. sent9: there is something such that that it is a bacchanal and a bigoted is not right. sent10: the hibachi is a stopover. sent11: the fact that the azurite is a kind of extrospective thing that is a bigoted is not true if it does not teethe. sent12: that something is a stopover that is a kind of a bigoted is incorrect if it is not insentient. sent13: if that the hibachi is a squint but it is sentient does not hold it is not a cardamom. sent14: that the hibachi is a bacchanal and is a bigoted is not correct. sent15: the fact that the azurite squints but it is not a kind of a stopover is not right. sent16: the azurite is a stopover if there is something such that it is a bigoted. sent17: if something does not squint the fact that it is a stopover and insentient is not true. sent18: the fact that the hibachi does squint and it is insentient is not true. sent19: the azurite is not a kind of a squint. sent20: the fact that the azurite is a kind of chemotherapeutic thing that is Pavlovian does not hold. sent21: that the hibachi is both a squint and not insentient is not true. sent22: there is something such that the fact that it is insentient and it squints is false. sent23: the azurite is not a Trinidadian. ; $proof$ = 
sent13 & sent21 -> int1: the hibachi is not a cardamom.; sent8 -> int2: if the hibachi is not a cardamom then that it is a kind of a bacchanal and is not a kind of a bigoted does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that the hibachi is a bacchanal and not a bigoted does not hold.; int3 -> int4: there exists something such that that it is a kind of a bacchanal and it is not a kind of a bigoted is not right.; int4 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__