the postwarness occurs and the slugging foster-sister does not occur.
sent1: the postwarness but not the slugging foster-sister occurs if the pentatonicness does not occur. sent2: that the school does not occur is brought about by that the Augustanness does not occur and/or the rationalization does not occur. sent3: either the succinicness does not occur or the encouraging antiflatulent occurs or both. sent4: if the lay-up does not occur then that the succinicness does not occur and/or the encouraging antiflatulent occurs is not right. sent5: the slugging foster-sister does not occur. sent6: either the gladiatorialness does not occur or the immutableness happens or both. sent7: that the affliction does not occur or the slugging Tobagonian occurs or both is incorrect if the badgering does not occur. sent8: the encouraging antiflatulent does not occur. sent9: the backstopping does not occur if the chairing occurs. sent10: if the lay-up does not occur the fact that the encouraging antiflatulent does not occur is correct. sent11: the gladiatorialness and/or the non-immutableness occurs. sent12: if the pentatonicness does not occur the slugging foster-sister does not occur. sent13: both the slugging revolutionist and the non-corruptingness occurs if the basics does not occur. sent14: either the tournament does not occur or the slugging LASEK occurs or both. sent15: the non-gladiatorialness and/or that the immutableness does not occur prevents the pentatonicness. sent16: the lactation happens but the dressing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lay-up does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the non-succinicness and/or the encouraging antiflatulent happens is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the lay-up occurs.;
the fact that the postwarness but not the slugging foster-sister happens does not hold.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the postwarness occurs and the slugging foster-sister does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the postwarness but not the slugging foster-sister occurs if the pentatonicness does not occur. sent2: that the school does not occur is brought about by that the Augustanness does not occur and/or the rationalization does not occur. sent3: either the succinicness does not occur or the encouraging antiflatulent occurs or both. sent4: if the lay-up does not occur then that the succinicness does not occur and/or the encouraging antiflatulent occurs is not right. sent5: the slugging foster-sister does not occur. sent6: either the gladiatorialness does not occur or the immutableness happens or both. sent7: that the affliction does not occur or the slugging Tobagonian occurs or both is incorrect if the badgering does not occur. sent8: the encouraging antiflatulent does not occur. sent9: the backstopping does not occur if the chairing occurs. sent10: if the lay-up does not occur the fact that the encouraging antiflatulent does not occur is correct. sent11: the gladiatorialness and/or the non-immutableness occurs. sent12: if the pentatonicness does not occur the slugging foster-sister does not occur. sent13: both the slugging revolutionist and the non-corruptingness occurs if the basics does not occur. sent14: either the tournament does not occur or the slugging LASEK occurs or both. sent15: the non-gladiatorialness and/or that the immutableness does not occur prevents the pentatonicness. sent16: the lactation happens but the dressing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lay-up does not occur.; sent4 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the non-succinicness and/or the encouraging antiflatulent happens is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: the lay-up occurs.; __UNKNOWN__