the birefringence is not a kind of a iambic.
sent1: the universal does pitch saffron. sent2: if the Coke is not a expansivity that either the birefringence does pitch saffron or it does subtilize Katsuwonus or both is not correct. sent3: The saffron does pitch universal. sent4: something that is not iambic either is not an antimatter or is unseasonable or both. sent5: if the universal is a kind of a iambic the fact that the birefringence is iambic but it does not pitch saffron is wrong. sent6: the birefringence is not a kind of a iambic if that the hussar is both not an antimatter and not unseasonable is false. sent7: if the hussar is not iambic then it does garner fictionalization. sent8: if something does not pitch saffron then it garners objectivity. sent9: the birefringence is a kind of an antimatter. sent10: the Coke is not a expansivity. sent11: something is an antimatter if it does not garner objectivity. sent12: the fact that the hussar is not a iambic is not false. sent13: the hussar is not iambic if there exists something such that the fact that it does pitch saffron or does subtilize Katsuwonus or both does not hold. sent14: the fact that the undergraduate does not garner objectivity and it is not a mailing is not correct. sent15: if the universal does pitch saffron then it lives. sent16: the universal is not live if that the fact that it does feminize and it does not garner objectivity hold is wrong.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the universal does feminize but it does not garner objectivity is false.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the universal is not live.; sent15 & sent1 -> int2: the universal is live.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the universal does feminize but it does not garner objectivity.; int4 -> int5: that the universal does not garner objectivity is not false.; sent11 -> int6: if the universal does not garner objectivity it is an antimatter.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the universal is an antimatter.;
the fact that that the cellphone does not track and is not live is not true hold.
sent4 -> int8: the hussar is not an antimatter and/or it is unseasonable if it is not iambic.; sent2 & sent10 -> int9: the fact that the birefringence does pitch saffron and/or it subtilizes Katsuwonus is wrong.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that that either it pitches saffron or it does subtilize Katsuwonus or both is not right.; int10 & sent13 -> int11: the hussar is not a iambic.; int8 & int11 -> int12: the hussar is not an antimatter and/or it is unseasonable.; int12 -> int13: there is something such that it is not a kind of an antimatter and/or it is unseasonable.;
$hypothesis$ = the birefringence is not a kind of a iambic. ; $context$ = sent1: the universal does pitch saffron. sent2: if the Coke is not a expansivity that either the birefringence does pitch saffron or it does subtilize Katsuwonus or both is not correct. sent3: The saffron does pitch universal. sent4: something that is not iambic either is not an antimatter or is unseasonable or both. sent5: if the universal is a kind of a iambic the fact that the birefringence is iambic but it does not pitch saffron is wrong. sent6: the birefringence is not a kind of a iambic if that the hussar is both not an antimatter and not unseasonable is false. sent7: if the hussar is not iambic then it does garner fictionalization. sent8: if something does not pitch saffron then it garners objectivity. sent9: the birefringence is a kind of an antimatter. sent10: the Coke is not a expansivity. sent11: something is an antimatter if it does not garner objectivity. sent12: the fact that the hussar is not a iambic is not false. sent13: the hussar is not iambic if there exists something such that the fact that it does pitch saffron or does subtilize Katsuwonus or both does not hold. sent14: the fact that the undergraduate does not garner objectivity and it is not a mailing is not correct. sent15: if the universal does pitch saffron then it lives. sent16: the universal is not live if that the fact that it does feminize and it does not garner objectivity hold is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the universal does feminize but it does not garner objectivity is false.; sent16 & assump1 -> int1: the universal is not live.; sent15 & sent1 -> int2: the universal is live.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the universal does feminize but it does not garner objectivity.; int4 -> int5: that the universal does not garner objectivity is not false.; sent11 -> int6: if the universal does not garner objectivity it is an antimatter.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the universal is an antimatter.; __UNKNOWN__