the fact that there is something such that if that it does not consummate and it is helpful is not right it is technical is not false.
sent1: something is technical if that it does consummate and is helpful does not hold. sent2: if something does not vault torpor and does weave it scourges parathormone. sent3: the bacchant is humane if that it is helpful and it is emmetropic is false. sent4: if the fact that something does not purify salsify but it vaults Aegypius does not hold then it vaults Atticus. sent5: there exists something such that if that that it is not a kind of a nybble and it is a kind of a rearrangement is right is not correct then it is Ambrosian. sent6: if something is not helpful then it is a technical. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Bolivian and vaults lepidopterology then it is a destructibility. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a deportation it is a pyre. sent9: there is something such that if it does not vault lepidopterology it vaults torpor. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it does not vault confirmation and is buccal is false the fact that it is a kind of a rearrangement is not incorrect. sent11: if a non-emmetropic thing does excrete it cozens. sent12: if the slave is both not divergent and technical the fact that it does vault alkalemia is right. sent13: if the fact that something is non-pudendal and not non-gnostic does not hold it is gonadal.
there is something such that if that it does not purify salsify and vaults Aegypius is incorrect the fact that it does vault Atticus is correct.
sent4 -> int1: if that the hem does not purify salsify and does vault Aegypius is not correct then it does vault Atticus.; int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if that it does not consummate and it is helpful is not right it is technical is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: something is technical if that it does consummate and is helpful does not hold. sent2: if something does not vault torpor and does weave it scourges parathormone. sent3: the bacchant is humane if that it is helpful and it is emmetropic is false. sent4: if the fact that something does not purify salsify but it vaults Aegypius does not hold then it vaults Atticus. sent5: there exists something such that if that that it is not a kind of a nybble and it is a kind of a rearrangement is right is not correct then it is Ambrosian. sent6: if something is not helpful then it is a technical. sent7: there exists something such that if it is not a kind of a Bolivian and vaults lepidopterology then it is a destructibility. sent8: there exists something such that if it is not a deportation it is a pyre. sent9: there is something such that if it does not vault lepidopterology it vaults torpor. sent10: there is something such that if the fact that it does not vault confirmation and is buccal is false the fact that it is a kind of a rearrangement is not incorrect. sent11: if a non-emmetropic thing does excrete it cozens. sent12: if the slave is both not divergent and technical the fact that it does vault alkalemia is right. sent13: if the fact that something is non-pudendal and not non-gnostic does not hold it is gonadal. ; $proof$ = 
__UNKNOWN__