that that the efficientness occurs is caused by that the acetonicness occurs does not hold.
sent1: the fact that the identifying Ascidiaceae does not occur and/or the backup happens is incorrect. sent2: that the Bahamian happens is not incorrect if the tragedy does not occur. sent3: the succussion does not occur if the preconditioning occurs and the acetonicness happens. sent4: if that the misfeasance but not the rabbetting recusancy happens is wrong then the tragedy does not occur. sent5: that either the non-gluttonousness or the product or both occurs does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the non-gluttonousness and/or the product occurs does not hold then the precondition happens. sent7: that the fact that the misfeasance but not the rabbetting recusancy occurs does not hold is correct if the succussion does not occur. sent8: the efficientness occurs if the Bahamianness happens.
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the precondition occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acetonicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the precondition and the acetonicness happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the succussion does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the misfeasance occurs and the rabbetting recusancy does not occur does not hold.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the tragedy does not occur.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Bahamianness occurs is not false.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the efficientness occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the efficientness occurs is caused by that the acetonicness occurs does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the identifying Ascidiaceae does not occur and/or the backup happens is incorrect. sent2: that the Bahamian happens is not incorrect if the tragedy does not occur. sent3: the succussion does not occur if the preconditioning occurs and the acetonicness happens. sent4: if that the misfeasance but not the rabbetting recusancy happens is wrong then the tragedy does not occur. sent5: that either the non-gluttonousness or the product or both occurs does not hold. sent6: if the fact that the non-gluttonousness and/or the product occurs does not hold then the precondition happens. sent7: that the fact that the misfeasance but not the rabbetting recusancy occurs does not hold is correct if the succussion does not occur. sent8: the efficientness occurs if the Bahamianness happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 & sent5 -> int1: the precondition occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the acetonicness occurs.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the precondition and the acetonicness happens.; sent3 & int2 -> int3: the succussion does not occur.; sent7 & int3 -> int4: that the misfeasance occurs and the rabbetting recusancy does not occur does not hold.; sent4 & int4 -> int5: the tragedy does not occur.; sent2 & int5 -> int6: the fact that the Bahamianness occurs is not false.; sent8 & int6 -> int7: the efficientness occurs.; [assump1] & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__