that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an idle and is a kind of a offside does not hold it does not riposte neurophysiology is false.
sent1: if the plaiter is not an idle but it is a offside it does not riposte neurophysiology. sent2: there exists something such that if that the fact that it is not an idle and it is a offside hold does not hold it does riposte neurophysiology. sent3: the plaiter is a marshmallow if the fact that it is not a saprobe and it is a physiologist is false. sent4: if that the plaiter does not idle but it is a kind of a offside is not correct then it does riposte neurophysiology. sent5: the fact that the plaiter does not riposte neurophysiology is right if it is not offside. sent6: if that the plaiter is not an idle but it is a offside does not hold then it does not riposte neurophysiology. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a offside is correct then it does not riposte neurophysiology. sent8: if the fact that something is not offside and is a Conium is not correct then it is not a daub.
sent6 -> hypothesis;
if that the plaiter is not a offside but it is a Conium is false it does not daub.
sent8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is not an idle and is a kind of a offside does not hold it does not riposte neurophysiology is false. ; $context$ = sent1: if the plaiter is not an idle but it is a offside it does not riposte neurophysiology. sent2: there exists something such that if that the fact that it is not an idle and it is a offside hold does not hold it does riposte neurophysiology. sent3: the plaiter is a marshmallow if the fact that it is not a saprobe and it is a physiologist is false. sent4: if that the plaiter does not idle but it is a kind of a offside is not correct then it does riposte neurophysiology. sent5: the fact that the plaiter does not riposte neurophysiology is right if it is not offside. sent6: if that the plaiter is not an idle but it is a offside does not hold then it does not riposte neurophysiology. sent7: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a offside is correct then it does not riposte neurophysiology. sent8: if the fact that something is not offside and is a Conium is not correct then it is not a daub. ; $proof$ = 
sent6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__