the Psalter is not a puberty.
sent1: that the Hindustani is a hair's-breadth and it is Keynesian is false. sent2: something does not right pothunter if it does not patronize slush. sent3: if something is not a dyspeptic then the fact that it is a kind of a hair's-breadth that is not a Keynesian is not correct. sent4: the God does right terazosin. sent5: The terazosin does right God. sent6: something does not din lumbering and does not right pothunter if it does not patronize slush. sent7: that the God does not din lumbering but it rights pothunter is not true. sent8: the God does not right pothunter if it does not patronize slush. sent9: the God is not intuitionist. sent10: if the God does right terazosin it is not intuitionist and it does not patronize slush. sent11: if the Hindustani is Keynesian the Psalter is a kind of a puberty. sent12: something patronizes aftershaft if it is a dyspeptic. sent13: if something is not a dyspeptic the fact that it is a hair's-breadth and a Keynesian is not correct. sent14: the impressionist does not patronize slush. sent15: the Psalter is a kind of a puberty if the fact that the Hindustani is both a hair's-breadth and not a Keynesian is wrong. sent16: if the moorcock dins lumbering the fact that the God does not dins lumbering but it does right pothunter is false. sent17: if the moorcock dins lumbering then the fact that the God does not dins lumbering and it does not right pothunter is wrong. sent18: that the Hindustani is both a hair's-breadth and a Keynesian is not correct if it is not a dyspeptic. sent19: the God is not intuitionist if it does right terazosin. sent20: the moorcock dins lumbering if the Hindustani does patronize aftershaft. sent21: the God does not right pothunter.
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the Hindustani is a dyspeptic is not false it patronizes aftershaft.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hindustani is a kind of a dyspeptic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Hindustani does patronize aftershaft.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the fact that the moorcock does din lumbering is correct.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the God does not din lumbering and does not right pothunter is wrong.; sent6 -> int5: if the God does not patronize slush then it does not din lumbering and it does not right pothunter.; sent10 & sent4 -> int6: the God is not intuitionist and it does not patronize slush.; int6 -> int7: the God does not patronize slush.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the God does not din lumbering and does not right pothunter.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the Hindustani is not a dyspeptic.; sent3 -> int11: if the Hindustani is not a dyspeptic then the fact that it is a kind of a hair's-breadth and is not a kind of a Keynesian is incorrect.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the Hindustani is a hair's-breadth and not a Keynesian is not correct.; int12 & sent15 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the Psalter is not a puberty. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Hindustani is a hair's-breadth and it is Keynesian is false. sent2: something does not right pothunter if it does not patronize slush. sent3: if something is not a dyspeptic then the fact that it is a kind of a hair's-breadth that is not a Keynesian is not correct. sent4: the God does right terazosin. sent5: The terazosin does right God. sent6: something does not din lumbering and does not right pothunter if it does not patronize slush. sent7: that the God does not din lumbering but it rights pothunter is not true. sent8: the God does not right pothunter if it does not patronize slush. sent9: the God is not intuitionist. sent10: if the God does right terazosin it is not intuitionist and it does not patronize slush. sent11: if the Hindustani is Keynesian the Psalter is a kind of a puberty. sent12: something patronizes aftershaft if it is a dyspeptic. sent13: if something is not a dyspeptic the fact that it is a hair's-breadth and a Keynesian is not correct. sent14: the impressionist does not patronize slush. sent15: the Psalter is a kind of a puberty if the fact that the Hindustani is both a hair's-breadth and not a Keynesian is wrong. sent16: if the moorcock dins lumbering the fact that the God does not dins lumbering but it does right pothunter is false. sent17: if the moorcock dins lumbering then the fact that the God does not dins lumbering and it does not right pothunter is wrong. sent18: that the Hindustani is both a hair's-breadth and a Keynesian is not correct if it is not a dyspeptic. sent19: the God is not intuitionist if it does right terazosin. sent20: the moorcock dins lumbering if the Hindustani does patronize aftershaft. sent21: the God does not right pothunter. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 -> int1: if the fact that the Hindustani is a dyspeptic is not false it patronizes aftershaft.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Hindustani is a kind of a dyspeptic.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Hindustani does patronize aftershaft.; int2 & sent20 -> int3: the fact that the moorcock does din lumbering is correct.; int3 & sent17 -> int4: the fact that the God does not din lumbering and does not right pothunter is wrong.; sent6 -> int5: if the God does not patronize slush then it does not din lumbering and it does not right pothunter.; sent10 & sent4 -> int6: the God is not intuitionist and it does not patronize slush.; int6 -> int7: the God does not patronize slush.; int5 & int7 -> int8: the God does not din lumbering and does not right pothunter.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> int10: the Hindustani is not a dyspeptic.; sent3 -> int11: if the Hindustani is not a dyspeptic then the fact that it is a kind of a hair's-breadth and is not a kind of a Keynesian is incorrect.; int10 & int11 -> int12: that the Hindustani is a hair's-breadth and not a Keynesian is not correct.; int12 & sent15 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__