the craw is a phosphor.
sent1: something quintuples cosmid and does capsize if it is not a rattan. sent2: that the craw revs is not false if there is something such that that it is not bilabial and it quintuples pestilence is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a bilabial and it does quintuple pestilence is false. sent4: the fact that the manakin does quintuple pantyhose and does not quintuple pestilence is not true if it is a kind of a morrow. sent5: if the router arrives then it is not classicistic and is not a mixology. sent6: if that the wiper is not a kind of a phosphor and it is non-meaningful is incorrect the tapeworm is non-meaningful. sent7: the fact that the musician revs hold if the hone is bilabial. sent8: if there exists something such that it does quintuple cosmid then the toehold is a morrow and is malignant. sent9: if something does rev then that it is a kind of non-meaningful thing that is not a kind of a Nilsson does not hold. sent10: something does rev if that it quintuples pestilence and it does not rev is not right. sent11: the fact that the Tagalog is non-light-duty thing that is not a homefolk does not hold. sent12: if a non-classicistic thing is not a mixology the Bannister is not a rattan. sent13: if the musician does rev then the fact that the wiper is not a phosphor and is not meaningful is wrong. sent14: the manakin is a morrow if the toehold is a morrow. sent15: the router does arrive.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the craw is not a phosphor.; sent9 -> int1: if the craw does rev then that it is not meaningful and it is not a kind of a Nilsson is not right.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the craw revs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that that the craw is a kind of non-meaningful thing that is not a Nilsson hold does not hold.;
the tapeworm is meaningful.
sent1 -> int4: the fact that the Bannister quintuples cosmid and it capsizes if the fact that the Bannister is not a rattan is not incorrect is not wrong.; sent5 & sent15 -> int5: the router is not classicistic and is not a kind of a mixology.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that it is both not classicistic and not a mixology.; int6 & sent12 -> int7: the Bannister is not a kind of a rattan.; int4 & int7 -> int8: the Bannister does quintuple cosmid and does capsize.; int8 -> int9: the Bannister does quintuple cosmid.; int9 -> int10: there exists something such that it quintuples cosmid.; int10 & sent8 -> int11: the toehold is both a morrow and malignant.; int11 -> int12: the toehold is a kind of a morrow.; sent14 & int12 -> int13: the manakin is a morrow.; sent4 & int13 -> int14: that the manakin quintuples pantyhose and does not quintuple pestilence is not correct.; int14 -> int15: there exists something such that that it does quintuple pantyhose and it does not quintuple pestilence is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the craw is a phosphor. ; $context$ = sent1: something quintuples cosmid and does capsize if it is not a rattan. sent2: that the craw revs is not false if there is something such that that it is not bilabial and it quintuples pestilence is false. sent3: there exists something such that that it is not a kind of a bilabial and it does quintuple pestilence is false. sent4: the fact that the manakin does quintuple pantyhose and does not quintuple pestilence is not true if it is a kind of a morrow. sent5: if the router arrives then it is not classicistic and is not a mixology. sent6: if that the wiper is not a kind of a phosphor and it is non-meaningful is incorrect the tapeworm is non-meaningful. sent7: the fact that the musician revs hold if the hone is bilabial. sent8: if there exists something such that it does quintuple cosmid then the toehold is a morrow and is malignant. sent9: if something does rev then that it is a kind of non-meaningful thing that is not a kind of a Nilsson does not hold. sent10: something does rev if that it quintuples pestilence and it does not rev is not right. sent11: the fact that the Tagalog is non-light-duty thing that is not a homefolk does not hold. sent12: if a non-classicistic thing is not a mixology the Bannister is not a rattan. sent13: if the musician does rev then the fact that the wiper is not a phosphor and is not meaningful is wrong. sent14: the manakin is a morrow if the toehold is a morrow. sent15: the router does arrive. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the craw is not a phosphor.; sent9 -> int1: if the craw does rev then that it is not meaningful and it is not a kind of a Nilsson is not right.; sent3 & sent2 -> int2: the craw revs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: that that the craw is a kind of non-meaningful thing that is not a Nilsson hold does not hold.; __UNKNOWN__