the fact that there is something such that if it is not tannic it does not elaborate radar and is a Castroism is not true.
sent1: there exists something such that if it is not tannic it does not elaborate radar. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a supervision hold it is not wide and it is a mush. sent3: if the fact that the radiochlorine does not capsize hold it does not elaborate radar and it is a Smyrnium. sent4: the radiochlorine is not a imbibition but it does fear if the fact that it is not a Wolffia is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a VD then it is not a vaporizer and basks. sent6: the radiochlorine is not unscientific and is tannic if it does not elaborate neophyte. sent7: if the radiochlorine is not tannic it does not elaborate radar and it is a Castroism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not maxillodental then it does not enclose frostiness and elaborates winter. sent9: there is something such that if it is not tannic then it is a Castroism. sent10: there is something such that if it is not tannic then it elaborates radar and is a Castroism. sent11: if the radiochlorine is non-tannic then it is not a snowboarder but a fucking. sent12: the radiochlorine does not elaborate radar if it is not tannic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a Niobrara it is not a Lamaist but autobiographical. sent14: there exists something such that if it is tannic it does not elaborate radar and is a Castroism. sent15: if that the radiochlorine is tannic is correct it does not elaborate radar and is a Castroism. sent16: if something does not lease rolling then it is not a Castroism and it is syntactic. sent17: if the radiochlorine is not a bathyscaphe it does not enclose frostiness and it is a Castroism.
sent7 -> hypothesis;
the frostiness is not a Castroism but syntactic if it does not lease rolling.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that there is something such that if it is not tannic it does not elaborate radar and is a Castroism is not true. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists something such that if it is not tannic it does not elaborate radar. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is not a supervision hold it is not wide and it is a mush. sent3: if the fact that the radiochlorine does not capsize hold it does not elaborate radar and it is a Smyrnium. sent4: the radiochlorine is not a imbibition but it does fear if the fact that it is not a Wolffia is not wrong. sent5: there is something such that if it is not a VD then it is not a vaporizer and basks. sent6: the radiochlorine is not unscientific and is tannic if it does not elaborate neophyte. sent7: if the radiochlorine is not tannic it does not elaborate radar and it is a Castroism. sent8: there is something such that if it is not maxillodental then it does not enclose frostiness and elaborates winter. sent9: there is something such that if it is not tannic then it is a Castroism. sent10: there is something such that if it is not tannic then it elaborates radar and is a Castroism. sent11: if the radiochlorine is non-tannic then it is not a snowboarder but a fucking. sent12: the radiochlorine does not elaborate radar if it is not tannic. sent13: there is something such that if it is not a Niobrara it is not a Lamaist but autobiographical. sent14: there exists something such that if it is tannic it does not elaborate radar and is a Castroism. sent15: if that the radiochlorine is tannic is correct it does not elaborate radar and is a Castroism. sent16: if something does not lease rolling then it is not a Castroism and it is syntactic. sent17: if the radiochlorine is not a bathyscaphe it does not enclose frostiness and it is a Castroism. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__