the chandler is a kind of a Jungian and/or is an implantation.
sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not bar tetrameter and is not a disinheritance is not right then the raceway is not a whitefish. sent2: the chandler does not bar tetrameter if it is not a whitefish and is an implantation. sent3: the chandler does not bar tetrameter. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is an implantation and does not deglaze Mbundu is false. sent5: if there is something such that that it is not a ramontchi and it is non-minty does not hold then the raceway is antistrophic. sent6: the fact that if the chandler does not deglaze Mbundu the chandler is Jungian is true. sent7: the fact that if the fact that something is not a whitefish or it does deglaze Mbundu or both is not true then it does not bar tetrameter hold. sent8: the chandler does not deglaze Mbundu if it does not bar tetrameter and is not a kind of a disinheritance. sent9: if something is not an implantation then the fact that it is both not a Coward and a Jungian is incorrect. sent10: if something is not a kind of a whitefish then the fact that it either is Jungian or is an implantation or both is not true. sent11: there exists something such that that it is not a ramontchi and it is not minty does not hold. sent12: that the breakfast is a kind of an equine is true. sent13: if the breakfast is a kind of an equine then the fact that it does not deglaze isochrone and it is likable does not hold. sent14: the raceway is a kind of a retribution if there exists something such that that it is not diagonalizable and it is not a retribution is not correct. sent15: the fact that if the fact that the takin is not normal is not incorrect then that the takin is not diagonalizable and is not a retribution is not right is not wrong. sent16: the buyer is not a kind of a Jungian if there exists something such that that it is not a Coward and it is Jungian is not correct. sent17: if something is a retribution and antistrophic it is not a kind of an implantation. sent18: if that the breakfast does not deglaze isochrone but it is likable is incorrect the takin is not normal.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chandler does not bar tetrameter and is not a disinheritance does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that the fact that it does not bar tetrameter and it is not a disinheritance is right is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the raceway is not a whitefish.;
the buyer does not bar tetrameter.
sent7 -> int3: if that the buyer is not a whitefish and/or deglazes Mbundu is false then it does not bar tetrameter.; sent9 -> int4: the fact that the raceway is not a Coward but it is Jungian is not true if it is not an implantation.; sent17 -> int5: the raceway is not an implantation if it is a retribution and it is antistrophic.; sent13 & sent12 -> int6: that the breakfast does not deglaze isochrone and is likable is incorrect.; sent18 & int6 -> int7: the takin is not normal.; sent15 & int7 -> int8: that the takin is not diagonalizable and it is not a retribution is not true.; int8 -> int9: there exists something such that that it is both not diagonalizable and not a retribution is false.; int9 & sent14 -> int10: the raceway is a retribution.; sent11 & sent5 -> int11: the raceway is antistrophic.; int10 & int11 -> int12: the raceway is a kind of a retribution that is antistrophic.; int5 & int12 -> int13: the raceway is not an implantation.; int4 & int13 -> int14: the fact that the raceway is not a Coward but it is Jungian is false.; int14 -> int15: there is something such that the fact that it is both not a Coward and a Jungian does not hold.; int15 & sent16 -> int16: the buyer is not a Jungian.;
$hypothesis$ = the chandler is a kind of a Jungian and/or is an implantation. ; $context$ = sent1: if there exists something such that the fact that it does not bar tetrameter and is not a disinheritance is not right then the raceway is not a whitefish. sent2: the chandler does not bar tetrameter if it is not a whitefish and is an implantation. sent3: the chandler does not bar tetrameter. sent4: there is something such that the fact that it is an implantation and does not deglaze Mbundu is false. sent5: if there is something such that that it is not a ramontchi and it is non-minty does not hold then the raceway is antistrophic. sent6: the fact that if the chandler does not deglaze Mbundu the chandler is Jungian is true. sent7: the fact that if the fact that something is not a whitefish or it does deglaze Mbundu or both is not true then it does not bar tetrameter hold. sent8: the chandler does not deglaze Mbundu if it does not bar tetrameter and is not a kind of a disinheritance. sent9: if something is not an implantation then the fact that it is both not a Coward and a Jungian is incorrect. sent10: if something is not a kind of a whitefish then the fact that it either is Jungian or is an implantation or both is not true. sent11: there exists something such that that it is not a ramontchi and it is not minty does not hold. sent12: that the breakfast is a kind of an equine is true. sent13: if the breakfast is a kind of an equine then the fact that it does not deglaze isochrone and it is likable does not hold. sent14: the raceway is a kind of a retribution if there exists something such that that it is not diagonalizable and it is not a retribution is not correct. sent15: the fact that if the fact that the takin is not normal is not incorrect then that the takin is not diagonalizable and is not a retribution is not right is not wrong. sent16: the buyer is not a kind of a Jungian if there exists something such that that it is not a Coward and it is Jungian is not correct. sent17: if something is a retribution and antistrophic it is not a kind of an implantation. sent18: if that the breakfast does not deglaze isochrone but it is likable is incorrect the takin is not normal. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the chandler does not bar tetrameter and is not a disinheritance does not hold.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that the fact that it does not bar tetrameter and it is not a disinheritance is right is incorrect.; int1 & sent1 -> int2: the raceway is not a whitefish.; __UNKNOWN__