there exists something such that if it does consternate innateness then it is unmanly.
sent1: the entree is avocational. sent2: something that does redeposit is endothelial. sent3: that something disentangles cab if the fact that it is not amphitropous is incorrect is not wrong. sent4: the perspiration is spermicidal. sent5: if the entree does consternate innateness then it is a transparency. sent6: the entree is depressant. sent7: if the entree does consternate innateness then it is imitative. sent8: if something is a stem then it is a gloved. sent9: the malacologist is unmanly if it is a kind of a Mandalay. sent10: if the skidpan hollers then it is an antacid. sent11: if the underpass is a Sinitic then it is a transparency.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the entree does consternate innateness.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the entree is imitative.;
if the air-intake is amphitropous then it does disentangle cab.
sent3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that if it does consternate innateness then it is unmanly. ; $context$ = sent1: the entree is avocational. sent2: something that does redeposit is endothelial. sent3: that something disentangles cab if the fact that it is not amphitropous is incorrect is not wrong. sent4: the perspiration is spermicidal. sent5: if the entree does consternate innateness then it is a transparency. sent6: the entree is depressant. sent7: if the entree does consternate innateness then it is imitative. sent8: if something is a stem then it is a gloved. sent9: the malacologist is unmanly if it is a kind of a Mandalay. sent10: if the skidpan hollers then it is an antacid. sent11: if the underpass is a Sinitic then it is a transparency. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the entree does consternate innateness.; sent7 & assump1 -> int1: the entree is imitative.; __UNKNOWN__