the fact that the wattmeter justifies calpac and is Prussian is not correct.
sent1: if an engraver is not aeromechanic then the wattmeter does not abscise. sent2: if the syncretism is a kind of a knight and it is grammatical it is non-achromatic. sent3: the syncretism is a stotinka. sent4: the syncretism is an engraver and is non-aeromechanic if it is a kind of a stotinka. sent5: if there is something such that it is both not achromatic and not ungrammatical the wattmeter is Prussian. sent6: that something is a stotinka and it is a compliment is not correct if it does not housekeep bimetallism. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a stotinka and it is a compliment does not hold that the probe does not abscise is not incorrect. sent8: if something that does housekeep bimetallism does not compliment it justifies calpac. sent9: the nabob is not achromatic. sent10: the nabob is grammatical. sent11: if something is not achromatic the fact that either it does not justify calpac or it is a kind of a Prussian or both is false. sent12: if something does not abscise it housekeeps bimetallism and is not a kind of a compliment.
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the syncretism is an engraver but it is not aeromechanic.; int1 -> int2: something is an engraver but it is not aeromechanic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the wattmeter does not abscise.; sent12 -> int4: if the wattmeter does not abscise it housekeeps bimetallism and is not a kind of a compliment.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the wattmeter does housekeep bimetallism but it is not a compliment.; sent8 -> int6: the wattmeter does justify calpac if it housekeeps bimetallism and it does not compliment.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the wattmeter justifies calpac hold.; sent9 & sent10 -> int8: the nabob is non-achromatic thing that is grammatical.; int8 -> int9: something is both non-achromatic and grammatical.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the wattmeter is a kind of a Prussian.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the probe does not abscise.
sent6 -> int11: if the syncretism does not housekeep bimetallism then that it is a kind of a stotinka and it is a compliment is incorrect.; sent11 -> int12: that the syncretism does not justify calpac and/or it is a Prussian is not correct if it is not achromatic.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the wattmeter justifies calpac and is Prussian is not correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if an engraver is not aeromechanic then the wattmeter does not abscise. sent2: if the syncretism is a kind of a knight and it is grammatical it is non-achromatic. sent3: the syncretism is a stotinka. sent4: the syncretism is an engraver and is non-aeromechanic if it is a kind of a stotinka. sent5: if there is something such that it is both not achromatic and not ungrammatical the wattmeter is Prussian. sent6: that something is a stotinka and it is a compliment is not correct if it does not housekeep bimetallism. sent7: if there exists something such that the fact that it is a stotinka and it is a compliment does not hold that the probe does not abscise is not incorrect. sent8: if something that does housekeep bimetallism does not compliment it justifies calpac. sent9: the nabob is not achromatic. sent10: the nabob is grammatical. sent11: if something is not achromatic the fact that either it does not justify calpac or it is a kind of a Prussian or both is false. sent12: if something does not abscise it housekeeps bimetallism and is not a kind of a compliment. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 & sent3 -> int1: the syncretism is an engraver but it is not aeromechanic.; int1 -> int2: something is an engraver but it is not aeromechanic.; int2 & sent1 -> int3: the wattmeter does not abscise.; sent12 -> int4: if the wattmeter does not abscise it housekeeps bimetallism and is not a kind of a compliment.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the wattmeter does housekeep bimetallism but it is not a compliment.; sent8 -> int6: the wattmeter does justify calpac if it housekeeps bimetallism and it does not compliment.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the wattmeter justifies calpac hold.; sent9 & sent10 -> int8: the nabob is non-achromatic thing that is grammatical.; int8 -> int9: something is both non-achromatic and grammatical.; int9 & sent5 -> int10: the wattmeter is a kind of a Prussian.; int7 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__