the loop does not freckle wigmaker.
sent1: the Wolf is both not bottom and not low-interest if that there is something such that it is not inefficient is true. sent2: the Wolf is not avitaminotic. sent3: the goody-goody is not an apathy if the Wolf is admissible and caters. sent4: the goody-goody does not freckle senna and is not a kind of a cardoon if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an apathy. sent5: the Wolf is nonrepetitive if it is not avitaminotic. sent6: the loop is not a cardoon but it does freckle senna if the fact that the goody-goody is not an apathy hold. sent7: if the loop is not a kind of a cardoon but it freckles senna then it does freckle wigmaker. sent8: something that is a kind of non-bottom thing that is not low-interest is not admissible. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not inefficient is not wrong. sent10: if the Wolf is not avitaminotic it is nonrepetitive and it caters. sent11: if something bottoms then the demon does not cater and is inefficient. sent12: there are inefficient things.
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the Wolf is not a kind of a bottom and it is not low-interest.; sent8 -> int2: the Wolf is admissible if it is not a kind of a bottom and it is not low-interest.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Wolf is admissible.; sent10 & sent2 -> int4: the Wolf is a kind of nonrepetitive thing that does cater.; int4 -> int5: the Wolf caters.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the Wolf is admissible and does cater.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the goody-goody is not an apathy.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the loop is not a cardoon but it does freckle senna.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the demon does not cater is right.
$hypothesis$ = the loop does not freckle wigmaker. ; $context$ = sent1: the Wolf is both not bottom and not low-interest if that there is something such that it is not inefficient is true. sent2: the Wolf is not avitaminotic. sent3: the goody-goody is not an apathy if the Wolf is admissible and caters. sent4: the goody-goody does not freckle senna and is not a kind of a cardoon if there exists something such that it is not a kind of an apathy. sent5: the Wolf is nonrepetitive if it is not avitaminotic. sent6: the loop is not a cardoon but it does freckle senna if the fact that the goody-goody is not an apathy hold. sent7: if the loop is not a kind of a cardoon but it freckles senna then it does freckle wigmaker. sent8: something that is a kind of non-bottom thing that is not low-interest is not admissible. sent9: there is something such that the fact that it is not inefficient is not wrong. sent10: if the Wolf is not avitaminotic it is nonrepetitive and it caters. sent11: if something bottoms then the demon does not cater and is inefficient. sent12: there are inefficient things. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the Wolf is not a kind of a bottom and it is not low-interest.; sent8 -> int2: the Wolf is admissible if it is not a kind of a bottom and it is not low-interest.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the Wolf is admissible.; sent10 & sent2 -> int4: the Wolf is a kind of nonrepetitive thing that does cater.; int4 -> int5: the Wolf caters.; int3 & int5 -> int6: the Wolf is admissible and does cater.; int6 & sent3 -> int7: the goody-goody is not an apathy.; int7 & sent6 -> int8: the loop is not a cardoon but it does freckle senna.; int8 & sent7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__