that both the curbing weatherliness and the pea-souper happens is caused by that the subtropicalness does not occur.
sent1: that the subtropicalness occurs is triggered by that the interposing stew does not occur and the coccalness does not occur. sent2: the curbing coir happens and the softball occurs. sent3: if the majoring does not occur then the divulgence happens. sent4: if the pea-souper does not occur the interposing stew does not occur. sent5: the interposing stew does not occur. sent6: the divulgence occurs. sent7: if the interposing stew but not the coccalness happens then the subtropicalness happens. sent8: that the curbing weatherliness but not the arriving urge occurs is caused by that the curbing Nox does not occur. sent9: the majors does not occur. sent10: if the subtropicalness occurs then both the curbing weatherliness and the pea-souper happens. sent11: the curbing Nox does not occur if the laparotomy occurs and the divulgence occurs. sent12: both the indehiscentness and the gymnasticsness happens. sent13: if the majoring does not occur then the laparotomy happens and the divulgence happens. sent14: the fact that the arriving urge does not occur is not incorrect. sent15: the arriving conformity does not occur. sent16: the arriving urge does not occur if the curbing Nox does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pea-souper does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subtropicalness does not occur.; sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the laparotomy happens and the divulgence happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the curbing Nox does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the curbing weatherliness occurs and the arriving urge does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the curbing weatherliness occurs.;
$hypothesis$ = that both the curbing weatherliness and the pea-souper happens is caused by that the subtropicalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: that the subtropicalness occurs is triggered by that the interposing stew does not occur and the coccalness does not occur. sent2: the curbing coir happens and the softball occurs. sent3: if the majoring does not occur then the divulgence happens. sent4: if the pea-souper does not occur the interposing stew does not occur. sent5: the interposing stew does not occur. sent6: the divulgence occurs. sent7: if the interposing stew but not the coccalness happens then the subtropicalness happens. sent8: that the curbing weatherliness but not the arriving urge occurs is caused by that the curbing Nox does not occur. sent9: the majors does not occur. sent10: if the subtropicalness occurs then both the curbing weatherliness and the pea-souper happens. sent11: the curbing Nox does not occur if the laparotomy occurs and the divulgence occurs. sent12: both the indehiscentness and the gymnasticsness happens. sent13: if the majoring does not occur then the laparotomy happens and the divulgence happens. sent14: the fact that the arriving urge does not occur is not incorrect. sent15: the arriving conformity does not occur. sent16: the arriving urge does not occur if the curbing Nox does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the pea-souper does not occur.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the subtropicalness does not occur.; sent13 & sent9 -> int1: the laparotomy happens and the divulgence happens.; sent11 & int1 -> int2: the curbing Nox does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the curbing weatherliness occurs and the arriving urge does not occur.; int3 -> int4: the curbing weatherliness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__