that the air-to-surfaceness occurs but the coursing does not occur is not right.
sent1: the gregariousness happens. sent2: that the coursing does not occur is caused by that the aberration and the territorialization occurs. sent3: the insubstantialness does not occur if that the synopticness happens and the compromising fleece does not occur is not true. sent4: if the compromising fleece happens the insubstantialness does not occur. sent5: that the synopticness happens but the compromising fleece does not occur does not hold if the territorialization does not occur. sent6: the gratification does not occur. sent7: the preparing ferociousness happens. sent8: that the synopticness happens and the compromising fleece occurs does not hold. sent9: the fact that the air-to-surfaceness occurs is not false. sent10: the aberration happens. sent11: the graduation occurs. sent12: if the territorialization does not occur the fact that the synopticness occurs and the compromising fleece occurs is wrong. sent13: the insubstantialness happens. sent14: the coordination does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the territorialization does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the synopticness but not the compromising fleece occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the insubstantialness does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the territorialization occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the aberration and the territorialization occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the coursing does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that the air-to-surfaceness but not the coursing occurs is not correct.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the air-to-surfaceness occurs but the coursing does not occur is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the gregariousness happens. sent2: that the coursing does not occur is caused by that the aberration and the territorialization occurs. sent3: the insubstantialness does not occur if that the synopticness happens and the compromising fleece does not occur is not true. sent4: if the compromising fleece happens the insubstantialness does not occur. sent5: that the synopticness happens but the compromising fleece does not occur does not hold if the territorialization does not occur. sent6: the gratification does not occur. sent7: the preparing ferociousness happens. sent8: that the synopticness happens and the compromising fleece occurs does not hold. sent9: the fact that the air-to-surfaceness occurs is not false. sent10: the aberration happens. sent11: the graduation occurs. sent12: if the territorialization does not occur the fact that the synopticness occurs and the compromising fleece occurs is wrong. sent13: the insubstantialness happens. sent14: the coordination does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the territorialization does not occur.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the synopticness but not the compromising fleece occurs is incorrect.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the insubstantialness does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the territorialization occurs.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: the aberration and the territorialization occurs.; int5 & sent2 -> int6: the coursing does not occur.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__