the transubstantiation happens.
sent1: the playoff and the ushering eliminator happens if the bicipitalness does not occur. sent2: the unrestrictiveness causes that the eviction occurs and the exhilarating piperazine occurs. sent3: the disreputableness does not occur and/or the conventionalness does not occur if the ushering eliminator does not occur. sent4: the bicipitalness happens and the rustication occurs. sent5: the osseousness occurs and/or the gastronomicness occurs. sent6: that the cyclone happens and the diminution does not occur prevents the osseousness. sent7: if the fact that both the non-osseousness and the gastronomicness happens is incorrect the transubstantiation does not occur. sent8: if both the non-osseousness and the gastronomicness occurs then the enactment does not occur. sent9: the embowering Pierce brings about that the segregating halogeton occurs. sent10: both the conventionalness and the nonindustrialness happens. sent11: if the disreputableness does not occur then that the nonindustrialness but not the ushering clatter occurs is wrong. sent12: that the diminution does not occur and the rustication occurs prevents that the transubstantiation does not occur. sent13: if that the osseousness happens is correct the cyclone occurs. sent14: both the corrigibleness and the embellishment occurs if the exhilarating piperazine occurs. sent15: the ushering eliminator happens and the playoff does not occur. sent16: that the conventionalness does not occur brings about that the rustication does not occur. sent17: the disreputableness happens if the playoff happens. sent18: the cyclone does not occur if the ushering clatter does not occur and the diminution does not occur. sent19: the synovialness happens. sent20: that the rustication does not occur or the conventionalness does not occur or both is false if the disreputableness occurs. sent21: the bicipitalness does not occur if that the bicipitalness happens and the Monacanness happens is incorrect. sent22: that the cyclone and the diminution occurs prevents the ushering clatter. sent23: if the rustication does not occur then both the nonindustrialness and the ushering clatter occurs. sent24: if the incorrigibleness does not occur then that the fact that both the bicipitalness and the Monacanness happens is not right is right. sent25: that the gastronomicness occurs prevents that the cyclone does not occur.
sent5 & sent13 & sent25 -> int1: the cyclone occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diminution happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cyclone and the diminution occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the fact that the ushering clatter does not occur is correct.; sent10 -> int4: the nonindustrialness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nonindustrialness occurs but the ushering clatter does not occur.; sent4 -> int6: the rustication occurs.;
that the enactment does not occur is not incorrect.
$hypothesis$ = the transubstantiation happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the playoff and the ushering eliminator happens if the bicipitalness does not occur. sent2: the unrestrictiveness causes that the eviction occurs and the exhilarating piperazine occurs. sent3: the disreputableness does not occur and/or the conventionalness does not occur if the ushering eliminator does not occur. sent4: the bicipitalness happens and the rustication occurs. sent5: the osseousness occurs and/or the gastronomicness occurs. sent6: that the cyclone happens and the diminution does not occur prevents the osseousness. sent7: if the fact that both the non-osseousness and the gastronomicness happens is incorrect the transubstantiation does not occur. sent8: if both the non-osseousness and the gastronomicness occurs then the enactment does not occur. sent9: the embowering Pierce brings about that the segregating halogeton occurs. sent10: both the conventionalness and the nonindustrialness happens. sent11: if the disreputableness does not occur then that the nonindustrialness but not the ushering clatter occurs is wrong. sent12: that the diminution does not occur and the rustication occurs prevents that the transubstantiation does not occur. sent13: if that the osseousness happens is correct the cyclone occurs. sent14: both the corrigibleness and the embellishment occurs if the exhilarating piperazine occurs. sent15: the ushering eliminator happens and the playoff does not occur. sent16: that the conventionalness does not occur brings about that the rustication does not occur. sent17: the disreputableness happens if the playoff happens. sent18: the cyclone does not occur if the ushering clatter does not occur and the diminution does not occur. sent19: the synovialness happens. sent20: that the rustication does not occur or the conventionalness does not occur or both is false if the disreputableness occurs. sent21: the bicipitalness does not occur if that the bicipitalness happens and the Monacanness happens is incorrect. sent22: that the cyclone and the diminution occurs prevents the ushering clatter. sent23: if the rustication does not occur then both the nonindustrialness and the ushering clatter occurs. sent24: if the incorrigibleness does not occur then that the fact that both the bicipitalness and the Monacanness happens is not right is right. sent25: that the gastronomicness occurs prevents that the cyclone does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent13 & sent25 -> int1: the cyclone occurs.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the diminution happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the cyclone and the diminution occurs.; int2 & sent22 -> int3: the fact that the ushering clatter does not occur is correct.; sent10 -> int4: the nonindustrialness happens.; int3 & int4 -> int5: the nonindustrialness occurs but the ushering clatter does not occur.; sent4 -> int6: the rustication occurs.; __UNKNOWN__