the dragonet fractures kaffiyeh.
sent1: if something is not negligent it does not service militarism and it does not fracture kaffiyeh. sent2: if something does not service militarism it is anatropous. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of nonspecific thing that does reface saltire. sent4: something is specific but it does not reface saltire. sent5: the dragonet fractures kaffiyeh if the fluorouracil does not reface Beninese. sent6: that the frame is anatropous is not false if it does not service militarism. sent7: if the frame is not a sojourn but it is anatropous then the fact that the roundsman is not negligent is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that it does not reface saltire. sent9: there exists something such that it is nonspecific thing that does not reface saltire. sent10: the frame is anatropous. sent11: if something does not service militarism then it is not a sojourn and it is anatropous. sent12: if something refaces Beninese the fact that it is not negligent and it services militarism is not true. sent13: the roundsman is a specific. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a specific. sent15: the dragonet is not negligent if something does not fracture kaffiyeh and it does not reface Beninese. sent16: the fact that the frame does not service militarism is true if something that is not a specific does not reface saltire.
sent11 -> int1: the frame is not a sojourn and is anatropous if it does not service militarism.; sent9 & sent16 -> int2: the frame does not service militarism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the frame is not a sojourn and not non-anatropous.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the roundsman is not negligent.;
the dragonet does not fracture kaffiyeh.
sent1 -> int5: if the dragonet is not negligent then it does not service militarism and does not fracture kaffiyeh.;
$hypothesis$ = the dragonet fractures kaffiyeh. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not negligent it does not service militarism and it does not fracture kaffiyeh. sent2: if something does not service militarism it is anatropous. sent3: there is something such that it is a kind of nonspecific thing that does reface saltire. sent4: something is specific but it does not reface saltire. sent5: the dragonet fractures kaffiyeh if the fluorouracil does not reface Beninese. sent6: that the frame is anatropous is not false if it does not service militarism. sent7: if the frame is not a sojourn but it is anatropous then the fact that the roundsman is not negligent is not incorrect. sent8: there is something such that it does not reface saltire. sent9: there exists something such that it is nonspecific thing that does not reface saltire. sent10: the frame is anatropous. sent11: if something does not service militarism then it is not a sojourn and it is anatropous. sent12: if something refaces Beninese the fact that it is not negligent and it services militarism is not true. sent13: the roundsman is a specific. sent14: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a specific. sent15: the dragonet is not negligent if something does not fracture kaffiyeh and it does not reface Beninese. sent16: the fact that the frame does not service militarism is true if something that is not a specific does not reface saltire. ; $proof$ = 
sent11 -> int1: the frame is not a sojourn and is anatropous if it does not service militarism.; sent9 & sent16 -> int2: the frame does not service militarism.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the frame is not a sojourn and not non-anatropous.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the roundsman is not negligent.; __UNKNOWN__