the necessity does subside nightrider and it is a sapphire.
sent1: if the nightrider is not a twofer the fact that the jeweler is either not appellate or not a oxaprozin or both is wrong. sent2: the nightrider is not a kind of a twofer if there exists something such that it is a gesso and not philological. sent3: something is ascitic. sent4: the jeweler is a kind of a sapphire. sent5: if the waterer is outside then it is a gesso and is not philological. sent6: the necessity does subside nightrider if there is something such that that either it is a Polyergus or it is choleraic or both is false. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a well the fact that the comber is a Polyergus and/or choleraic does not hold. sent8: the petiole is a kind of a monolatry if that either the jeweler is not appellate or it is not a oxaprozin or both is wrong. sent9: the necessity is a sapphire if the petiole is a monolatry. sent10: the waterer is an outside.
sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the waterer is a kind of a gesso and is not philological.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a gesso and it is not philological.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nightrider is not a twofer.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the jeweler is not appellate and/or it is not a oxaprozin does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the petiole is a monolatry.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the necessity is a sapphire hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the necessity does subside nightrider and it is a sapphire. ; $context$ = sent1: if the nightrider is not a twofer the fact that the jeweler is either not appellate or not a oxaprozin or both is wrong. sent2: the nightrider is not a kind of a twofer if there exists something such that it is a gesso and not philological. sent3: something is ascitic. sent4: the jeweler is a kind of a sapphire. sent5: if the waterer is outside then it is a gesso and is not philological. sent6: the necessity does subside nightrider if there is something such that that either it is a Polyergus or it is choleraic or both is false. sent7: if there exists something such that it is not a kind of a well the fact that the comber is a Polyergus and/or choleraic does not hold. sent8: the petiole is a kind of a monolatry if that either the jeweler is not appellate or it is not a oxaprozin or both is wrong. sent9: the necessity is a sapphire if the petiole is a monolatry. sent10: the waterer is an outside. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent10 -> int1: the waterer is a kind of a gesso and is not philological.; int1 -> int2: there exists something such that it is a gesso and it is not philological.; int2 & sent2 -> int3: the nightrider is not a twofer.; int3 & sent1 -> int4: that the jeweler is not appellate and/or it is not a oxaprozin does not hold.; int4 & sent8 -> int5: the petiole is a monolatry.; int5 & sent9 -> int6: that the necessity is a sapphire hold.; __UNKNOWN__