that the lemonade does not correct and it is not a miner is wrong.
sent1: if something is not non-macaronic the fact that it reassails parachute and does not furrow Cheiranthus does not hold. sent2: if that the coville is not a miner is not incorrect then the fact that the osteocyte does reassail parachute is true. sent3: the fact that the histocompatibility does not furrow Cheiranthus but it is macaronic is incorrect. sent4: if the parachute is not a file then that the lemonade is corrected thing that does not furrow Cheiranthus is right. sent5: something is a Gerbillus that is not a file if it enlivens Reuben. sent6: the reminder is not a shamelessness. sent7: the fact that something is not catadromous but it does enliven Cheiranthus is false if it does reassail parachute. sent8: the lemonade is not a miner but macaronic. sent9: if that the fact that the histocompatibility is not macaronic but it furrows Cheiranthus does not hold hold then it enlivens Cheiranthus. sent10: the coville is not macaronic and furrows Cheiranthus. sent11: if the histocompatibility does not reassail parachute the lemonade does not correct and it is not a miner. sent12: if the medlar is a Gerbillus but it is not a file the parachute is not a file. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a file and it does not enliven Reuben. sent14: if the histocompatibility is macaronic then that the coville is not macaronic and does furrow Cheiranthus is wrong. sent15: the coville is not a kind of a miner if the lemonade is corrected thing that does not furrow Cheiranthus. sent16: if the fact that the histocompatibility is not catadromous and enlivens Cheiranthus does not hold it is macaronic.
sent7 -> int1: that the fact that the histocompatibility is non-catadromous thing that does enliven Cheiranthus is not correct hold if it reassails parachute.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the histocompatibility reassails parachute.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the histocompatibility is a kind of non-catadromous thing that enlivens Cheiranthus is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the histocompatibility is macaronic.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the coville is not macaronic and furrows Cheiranthus is not right.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the histocompatibility does not reassail parachute.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the lemonade is uncorrected but not a miner is wrong.
sent1 -> int7: if the parachute is macaronic that it does reassail parachute and it does not furrow Cheiranthus does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = that the lemonade does not correct and it is not a miner is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: if something is not non-macaronic the fact that it reassails parachute and does not furrow Cheiranthus does not hold. sent2: if that the coville is not a miner is not incorrect then the fact that the osteocyte does reassail parachute is true. sent3: the fact that the histocompatibility does not furrow Cheiranthus but it is macaronic is incorrect. sent4: if the parachute is not a file then that the lemonade is corrected thing that does not furrow Cheiranthus is right. sent5: something is a Gerbillus that is not a file if it enlivens Reuben. sent6: the reminder is not a shamelessness. sent7: the fact that something is not catadromous but it does enliven Cheiranthus is false if it does reassail parachute. sent8: the lemonade is not a miner but macaronic. sent9: if that the fact that the histocompatibility is not macaronic but it furrows Cheiranthus does not hold hold then it enlivens Cheiranthus. sent10: the coville is not macaronic and furrows Cheiranthus. sent11: if the histocompatibility does not reassail parachute the lemonade does not correct and it is not a miner. sent12: if the medlar is a Gerbillus but it is not a file the parachute is not a file. sent13: there exists something such that it is not a file and it does not enliven Reuben. sent14: if the histocompatibility is macaronic then that the coville is not macaronic and does furrow Cheiranthus is wrong. sent15: the coville is not a kind of a miner if the lemonade is corrected thing that does not furrow Cheiranthus. sent16: if the fact that the histocompatibility is not catadromous and enlivens Cheiranthus does not hold it is macaronic. ; $proof$ = 
sent7 -> int1: that the fact that the histocompatibility is non-catadromous thing that does enliven Cheiranthus is not correct hold if it reassails parachute.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the histocompatibility reassails parachute.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: that the histocompatibility is a kind of non-catadromous thing that enlivens Cheiranthus is not correct.; int2 & sent16 -> int3: the histocompatibility is macaronic.; int3 & sent14 -> int4: the fact that the coville is not macaronic and furrows Cheiranthus is not right.; int4 & sent10 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the histocompatibility does not reassail parachute.; int6 & sent11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__