the toxicognath is a kind of a decorum.
sent1: something is labyrinthine if it is a backroom. sent2: if the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness that the refuge is both a helpfulness and not labyrinthine does not hold. sent3: if the refuge is labyrinthine then the shiksa is not a backroom. sent4: the fact that the panache is a kind of a markhor and is vestibular is not correct. sent5: that the shiksa is a backroom hold if the fact that that the panache is not a markhor but it is vestibular hold is not true. sent6: if something is inexpedient then that it is not a harridan or is not a kind of a Wisdom or both is wrong. sent7: the panache is not vestibular if the fact that the shiksa is a helpfulness but it is not a backroom is wrong. sent8: if that the ogre is a kind of a spendthrift and it is singular does not hold then the panache is not singular. sent9: the refuge does burglarize crossover if the shiksa is a markhor. sent10: if that the fact that the panache is a Reuben but it is not a markhor is not false is not true the shiksa is a markhor. sent11: the fact that the ghat is inexpedient hold. sent12: the cephaloglycin is not a helpfulness if the refuge burglarizes crossover and is labyrinthine. sent13: if something is not a kind of a Reuben then the fact that the panache is not a markhor but vestibular is incorrect. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not a Reuben then the fact that the panache is a markhor and it is not non-vestibular is incorrect. sent15: something burglarizes crossover if it does orchestrate mesothelium. sent16: the refuge is not a helpfulness if it is a kind of a backroom and/or it is vestibular. sent17: there is something such that it is a HCG. sent18: that the shiksa is a backroom that is a Reuben is not right. sent19: the pacesetter is not a Reuben if it is a HCG. sent20: the pacesetter is a HCG and/or is absent. sent21: the crossover is absent if the fact that the ghat is not a harridan or it is not a kind of a Wisdom or both is not correct. sent22: if something is not a kind of a singular that it is a Reuben and it is not a markhor does not hold. sent23: that the refuge is a helpfulness and labyrinthine is not true if the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness. sent24: if the pacesetter either is a kind of a HCG or absents or both then it is not a kind of a Reuben. sent25: the fact that the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness is not wrong if the stuffing burglarizes crossover. sent26: if the fact that the refuge is a helpfulness and is not labyrinthine is wrong then that the shiksa is not a kind of a backroom hold. sent27: if that something does not orchestrate mesothelium and orchestrates shiksa is incorrect then it burglarizes crossover.
sent27 -> int1: if the fact that the stuffing does not orchestrate mesothelium and orchestrates shiksa is false it does burglarize crossover.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the stuffing does not orchestrate mesothelium but it does orchestrate shiksa is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the stuffing does burglarize crossover.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the refuge is a helpfulness that is non-labyrinthine does not hold.; int4 & sent26 -> int5: the shiksa is not a kind of a backroom.; sent24 & sent20 -> int6: the pacesetter is not a kind of a Reuben.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a Reuben.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the panache is not a kind of a markhor but it is vestibular is incorrect.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the shiksa is a backroom.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the stuffing does not orchestrate mesothelium and orchestrates shiksa.; int11 -> int12: the stuffing does orchestrate shiksa.;
the toxicognath is not a decorum.
sent22 -> int13: that the panache is a Reuben but not a markhor is incorrect if it is not singular.; sent1 -> int14: the refuge is labyrinthine if it is a kind of a backroom.; sent6 -> int15: the fact that the ghat is not a harridan or is not a Wisdom or both is not true if it is inexpedient.; int15 & sent11 -> int16: that the ghat is not a kind of a harridan and/or it is not a Wisdom is not right.; sent21 & int16 -> int17: that the crossover does absent is not wrong.; int17 -> int18: there exists something such that the fact that it does not absent is not correct.;
$hypothesis$ = the toxicognath is a kind of a decorum. ; $context$ = sent1: something is labyrinthine if it is a backroom. sent2: if the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness that the refuge is both a helpfulness and not labyrinthine does not hold. sent3: if the refuge is labyrinthine then the shiksa is not a backroom. sent4: the fact that the panache is a kind of a markhor and is vestibular is not correct. sent5: that the shiksa is a backroom hold if the fact that that the panache is not a markhor but it is vestibular hold is not true. sent6: if something is inexpedient then that it is not a harridan or is not a kind of a Wisdom or both is wrong. sent7: the panache is not vestibular if the fact that the shiksa is a helpfulness but it is not a backroom is wrong. sent8: if that the ogre is a kind of a spendthrift and it is singular does not hold then the panache is not singular. sent9: the refuge does burglarize crossover if the shiksa is a markhor. sent10: if that the fact that the panache is a Reuben but it is not a markhor is not false is not true the shiksa is a markhor. sent11: the fact that the ghat is inexpedient hold. sent12: the cephaloglycin is not a helpfulness if the refuge burglarizes crossover and is labyrinthine. sent13: if something is not a kind of a Reuben then the fact that the panache is not a markhor but vestibular is incorrect. sent14: if there exists something such that it is not a Reuben then the fact that the panache is a markhor and it is not non-vestibular is incorrect. sent15: something burglarizes crossover if it does orchestrate mesothelium. sent16: the refuge is not a helpfulness if it is a kind of a backroom and/or it is vestibular. sent17: there is something such that it is a HCG. sent18: that the shiksa is a backroom that is a Reuben is not right. sent19: the pacesetter is not a Reuben if it is a HCG. sent20: the pacesetter is a HCG and/or is absent. sent21: the crossover is absent if the fact that the ghat is not a harridan or it is not a kind of a Wisdom or both is not correct. sent22: if something is not a kind of a singular that it is a Reuben and it is not a markhor does not hold. sent23: that the refuge is a helpfulness and labyrinthine is not true if the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness. sent24: if the pacesetter either is a kind of a HCG or absents or both then it is not a kind of a Reuben. sent25: the fact that the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness is not wrong if the stuffing burglarizes crossover. sent26: if the fact that the refuge is a helpfulness and is not labyrinthine is wrong then that the shiksa is not a kind of a backroom hold. sent27: if that something does not orchestrate mesothelium and orchestrates shiksa is incorrect then it burglarizes crossover. ; $proof$ = 
sent27 -> int1: if the fact that the stuffing does not orchestrate mesothelium and orchestrates shiksa is false it does burglarize crossover.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the stuffing does not orchestrate mesothelium but it does orchestrate shiksa is incorrect.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the stuffing does burglarize crossover.; int2 & sent25 -> int3: the cephaloglycin is a helpfulness.; int3 & sent2 -> int4: the fact that the refuge is a helpfulness that is non-labyrinthine does not hold.; int4 & sent26 -> int5: the shiksa is not a kind of a backroom.; sent24 & sent20 -> int6: the pacesetter is not a kind of a Reuben.; int6 -> int7: there exists something such that it is not a Reuben.; int7 & sent13 -> int8: the fact that the panache is not a kind of a markhor but it is vestibular is incorrect.; sent5 & int8 -> int9: the shiksa is a backroom.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the stuffing does not orchestrate mesothelium and orchestrates shiksa.; int11 -> int12: the stuffing does orchestrate shiksa.; __UNKNOWN__