the lantern-fly is middle.
sent1: there exists nothing such that it is not non-estrous and it is non-paramilitary. sent2: something that is a kind of univalve thing that is a potholer does not bother. sent3: the silverware is not estrous if there is something such that that it is estrous and it is not a paramilitary is incorrect. sent4: if the mayfish is a kind of a Postum the lantern-fly is Tyrolean. sent5: if something that does describe finale does not exempt conge it is estrous. sent6: the lantern-fly is not a Tyrolean if it does exempt conge and is not estrous. sent7: the silverware is not a Postum. sent8: the lantern-fly is Tyrolean if the mayfish is virulent. sent9: if something is virulent then it middles. sent10: if the lantern-fly does not describe finale then it exempts conge and is not estrous. sent11: if the mayfish is both a middle and virulent then it is not a Postum. sent12: either the mayfish is virulent or it is a Postum or both. sent13: if something is a Tyrolean and it is a middle then it does not exempt conge. sent14: if the lantern-fly is non-virulent then the mayfish is a kind of a Tyrolean. sent15: the silverware exempts conge and/or it is virulent. sent16: if something is scenic and is incestuous it is not a preemption. sent17: the fact that the silverware does describe finale but it does not exempt conge is not wrong if the lantern-fly does not exempt conge. sent18: the mayfish is not a paramilitary. sent19: the fact that something is non-virulent a Postum is wrong if it is not Tyrolean. sent20: the chondrichthian either describes finale or is estrous or both. sent21: the lantern-fly is a calculation. sent22: the lantern-fly is a hellfire and a hao.
sent12 & sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the lantern-fly is Tyrolean.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lantern-fly is a kind of a middle.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lantern-fly is a Tyrolean and it does middle.; sent13 -> int3: if the lantern-fly is Tyrolean thing that is middle it does not exempt conge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lantern-fly does not exempt conge.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the silverware does describe finale but it does not exempt conge.; sent5 -> int6: the silverware is estrous if it does describe finale and it does not exempt conge.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the silverware is estrous.; sent1 -> int8: that the chondrichthian is estrous but it is not a paramilitary does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is estrous thing that is not a paramilitary is not correct.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the silverware is not estrous is not incorrect.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis;
the lantern-fly is a middle.
sent9 -> int12: if the lantern-fly is virulent then it is a kind of a middle.; sent19 -> int13: if the lantern-fly is not a Tyrolean the fact that it is not virulent and it is a kind of a Postum is incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = the lantern-fly is middle. ; $context$ = sent1: there exists nothing such that it is not non-estrous and it is non-paramilitary. sent2: something that is a kind of univalve thing that is a potholer does not bother. sent3: the silverware is not estrous if there is something such that that it is estrous and it is not a paramilitary is incorrect. sent4: if the mayfish is a kind of a Postum the lantern-fly is Tyrolean. sent5: if something that does describe finale does not exempt conge it is estrous. sent6: the lantern-fly is not a Tyrolean if it does exempt conge and is not estrous. sent7: the silverware is not a Postum. sent8: the lantern-fly is Tyrolean if the mayfish is virulent. sent9: if something is virulent then it middles. sent10: if the lantern-fly does not describe finale then it exempts conge and is not estrous. sent11: if the mayfish is both a middle and virulent then it is not a Postum. sent12: either the mayfish is virulent or it is a Postum or both. sent13: if something is a Tyrolean and it is a middle then it does not exempt conge. sent14: if the lantern-fly is non-virulent then the mayfish is a kind of a Tyrolean. sent15: the silverware exempts conge and/or it is virulent. sent16: if something is scenic and is incestuous it is not a preemption. sent17: the fact that the silverware does describe finale but it does not exempt conge is not wrong if the lantern-fly does not exempt conge. sent18: the mayfish is not a paramilitary. sent19: the fact that something is non-virulent a Postum is wrong if it is not Tyrolean. sent20: the chondrichthian either describes finale or is estrous or both. sent21: the lantern-fly is a calculation. sent22: the lantern-fly is a hellfire and a hao. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent8 & sent4 -> int1: the lantern-fly is Tyrolean.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the lantern-fly is a kind of a middle.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the lantern-fly is a Tyrolean and it does middle.; sent13 -> int3: if the lantern-fly is Tyrolean thing that is middle it does not exempt conge.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the lantern-fly does not exempt conge.; int4 & sent17 -> int5: the silverware does describe finale but it does not exempt conge.; sent5 -> int6: the silverware is estrous if it does describe finale and it does not exempt conge.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the silverware is estrous.; sent1 -> int8: that the chondrichthian is estrous but it is not a paramilitary does not hold.; int8 -> int9: there is something such that that it is estrous thing that is not a paramilitary is not correct.; int9 & sent3 -> int10: the fact that the silverware is not estrous is not incorrect.; int7 & int10 -> int11: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__