the fact that if the selectwoman does page deactivation the quahog is a triangularity does not hold.
sent1: the quahog is comprehensive if the seta is not a triangularity and/or it does not subside. sent2: the quahog is a novelette. sent3: the selectwoman does not subside if the seta either is not noncomprehensive or does not page deactivation or both. sent4: if the seta is not noncomprehensive then the selectwoman does not page deactivation. sent5: the quahog is not noncomprehensive. sent6: if the seta is not noncomprehensive and/or it is not a triangularity then the quahog does not subside. sent7: the seta does not page deactivation. sent8: that something pages deactivation and is not a kind of a newspeak is not correct if it is not a triangularity. sent9: the seta does not page deactivation and/or it does not subside if the selectwoman is not noncomprehensive. sent10: the eyelet is noncomprehensive. sent11: the fact that the seta either does not subside or is not noncomprehensive or both if the quahog is not a triangularity is true. sent12: if that something is either not burrlike or not a Tellus or both is not true it is not a triangularity. sent13: the selectwoman does not subside and/or it pages deactivation. sent14: the selectwoman does not subside. sent15: the selectwoman does not page deactivation if the seta does not subside and/or it is not noncomprehensive. sent16: if the seta does not subside and/or is not noncomprehensive then the selectwoman pages deactivation. sent17: that something is not burrlike and/or it is not a Tellus is not true if the fact that it does not page adience is right. sent18: either the selectwoman does not subside or it is comprehensive or both if the seta does page deactivation. sent19: if the quahog is not a triangularity the seta does not subside and/or is noncomprehensive. sent20: if the quahog does steepen and does not page adience the seta does not page adience. sent21: something does not page deactivation if that it page deactivation and is not a newspeak is false. sent22: the fact that either the seta does not subside or it is noncomprehensive or both hold.
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the selectwoman does page deactivation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quahog is not a triangularity.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the seta does not subside and/or it is not noncomprehensive is not wrong.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the selectwoman does not page deactivation.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quahog is a triangularity.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the seta does not page deactivation.
sent21 -> int5: if that the seta pages deactivation and is not a newspeak is not correct then that it does not pages deactivation is not incorrect.; sent8 -> int6: the fact that if the fact that the seta is the triangularity does not hold that the seta does page deactivation and is not a kind of a newspeak is false is not false.; sent12 -> int7: the seta is not a triangularity if the fact that it is not burrlike or it is not a Tellus or both is incorrect.; sent17 -> int8: the fact that the seta is not burrlike or it is not a Tellus or both is not correct if it does not page adience.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that if the selectwoman does page deactivation the quahog is a triangularity does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: the quahog is comprehensive if the seta is not a triangularity and/or it does not subside. sent2: the quahog is a novelette. sent3: the selectwoman does not subside if the seta either is not noncomprehensive or does not page deactivation or both. sent4: if the seta is not noncomprehensive then the selectwoman does not page deactivation. sent5: the quahog is not noncomprehensive. sent6: if the seta is not noncomprehensive and/or it is not a triangularity then the quahog does not subside. sent7: the seta does not page deactivation. sent8: that something pages deactivation and is not a kind of a newspeak is not correct if it is not a triangularity. sent9: the seta does not page deactivation and/or it does not subside if the selectwoman is not noncomprehensive. sent10: the eyelet is noncomprehensive. sent11: the fact that the seta either does not subside or is not noncomprehensive or both if the quahog is not a triangularity is true. sent12: if that something is either not burrlike or not a Tellus or both is not true it is not a triangularity. sent13: the selectwoman does not subside and/or it pages deactivation. sent14: the selectwoman does not subside. sent15: the selectwoman does not page deactivation if the seta does not subside and/or it is not noncomprehensive. sent16: if the seta does not subside and/or is not noncomprehensive then the selectwoman pages deactivation. sent17: that something is not burrlike and/or it is not a Tellus is not true if the fact that it does not page adience is right. sent18: either the selectwoman does not subside or it is comprehensive or both if the seta does page deactivation. sent19: if the quahog is not a triangularity the seta does not subside and/or is noncomprehensive. sent20: if the quahog does steepen and does not page adience the seta does not page adience. sent21: something does not page deactivation if that it page deactivation and is not a newspeak is false. sent22: the fact that either the seta does not subside or it is noncomprehensive or both hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump2: Let's assume that the selectwoman does page deactivation.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the quahog is not a triangularity.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: that the seta does not subside and/or it is not noncomprehensive is not wrong.; sent15 & int1 -> int2: the selectwoman does not page deactivation.; assump2 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the quahog is a triangularity.; [assump2] & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__