the missionary happens.
sent1: the sedimenting warren occurs. sent2: the fact that not the sedimenting warren but the missionary occurs is wrong if the physiologicalness does not occur. sent3: that the networking Kroto does not occur but the sedimenting seaquake occurs does not hold. sent4: if that the networking Kroto does not occur but the sedimenting seaquake occurs is not true then that the echoicness does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the carnifying happens and/or the bolster does not occur. sent6: that the echoicness does not occur if the networking Kroto occurs is not wrong. sent7: that both the caudalness and the bolster happens is incorrect if the oleaceousness does not occur. sent8: if the echoicness does not occur then the caudalness and the oleaceousness occurs. sent9: the sedimenting warren triggers the physiologicalness. sent10: the fact that if the missionariness does not occur then that the bolster does not occur and the caudalness does not occur does not hold is not false. sent11: the non-caudalness is caused by that both the incidence and the carnifying occurs. sent12: the missionariness happens if the carnifying does not occur and/or the bolstering does not occur.
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the physiologicalness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnifying happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the echoicness does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the caudalness and the oleaceousness happens.; int3 -> int4: the caudalness occurs.;
the sedimenting fiberboard happens.
$hypothesis$ = the missionary happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the sedimenting warren occurs. sent2: the fact that not the sedimenting warren but the missionary occurs is wrong if the physiologicalness does not occur. sent3: that the networking Kroto does not occur but the sedimenting seaquake occurs does not hold. sent4: if that the networking Kroto does not occur but the sedimenting seaquake occurs is not true then that the echoicness does not occur is not wrong. sent5: the carnifying happens and/or the bolster does not occur. sent6: that the echoicness does not occur if the networking Kroto occurs is not wrong. sent7: that both the caudalness and the bolster happens is incorrect if the oleaceousness does not occur. sent8: if the echoicness does not occur then the caudalness and the oleaceousness occurs. sent9: the sedimenting warren triggers the physiologicalness. sent10: the fact that if the missionariness does not occur then that the bolster does not occur and the caudalness does not occur does not hold is not false. sent11: the non-caudalness is caused by that both the incidence and the carnifying occurs. sent12: the missionariness happens if the carnifying does not occur and/or the bolstering does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent1 -> int1: the physiologicalness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the carnifying happens.; sent4 & sent3 -> int2: the echoicness does not occur.; sent8 & int2 -> int3: the caudalness and the oleaceousness happens.; int3 -> int4: the caudalness occurs.; __UNKNOWN__