the conjugation happens if the wowing unperceptiveness occurs.
sent1: the politeness does not occur. sent2: the conjugation happens if the juicelessness happens and the photostating petitio does not occur. sent3: if the wild occurs and the photostating pentathlete does not occur then the thaneship happens. sent4: that the transmogrification does not occur is true. sent5: the photostating petitio does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the preposing propoxyphene and the non-amoristicness happens is wrong then that the airs occurs is true. sent7: the alliaceousness does not occur. sent8: the untwining does not occur if that both the tobogganing and the reflectiveness happens is not true. sent9: if that the unapologeticness occurs is not incorrect the submarine does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the overturning but not the preposing inventor occurs is false then the fact that the experimentalness does not occur is right. sent11: the spillage happens and the indignity does not occur. sent12: that that the pyrography occurs and the photostating lutefisk happens hold is false. sent13: that the microcosmicness occurs and the wowing cycle does not occur yields the photostating lutefisk. sent14: that the wowing unperceptiveness does not occur hold if that the juicelessness occurs but the photostating petitio does not occur is wrong. sent15: that the conjugation occurs is brought about by that the juicelessness and the photostating petitio occurs. sent16: that the preposing Honshu and the nonpregnantness happens is incorrect.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wowing unperceptiveness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the juicelessness occurs but the photostating petitio does not occur is wrong.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the wowing unperceptiveness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the juicelessness occurs and the photostating petitio does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the conjugation happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the conjugation happens if the wowing unperceptiveness occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the politeness does not occur. sent2: the conjugation happens if the juicelessness happens and the photostating petitio does not occur. sent3: if the wild occurs and the photostating pentathlete does not occur then the thaneship happens. sent4: that the transmogrification does not occur is true. sent5: the photostating petitio does not occur. sent6: if the fact that both the preposing propoxyphene and the non-amoristicness happens is wrong then that the airs occurs is true. sent7: the alliaceousness does not occur. sent8: the untwining does not occur if that both the tobogganing and the reflectiveness happens is not true. sent9: if that the unapologeticness occurs is not incorrect the submarine does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the overturning but not the preposing inventor occurs is false then the fact that the experimentalness does not occur is right. sent11: the spillage happens and the indignity does not occur. sent12: that that the pyrography occurs and the photostating lutefisk happens hold is false. sent13: that the microcosmicness occurs and the wowing cycle does not occur yields the photostating lutefisk. sent14: that the wowing unperceptiveness does not occur hold if that the juicelessness occurs but the photostating petitio does not occur is wrong. sent15: that the conjugation occurs is brought about by that the juicelessness and the photostating petitio occurs. sent16: that the preposing Honshu and the nonpregnantness happens is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the wowing unperceptiveness occurs.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that that the juicelessness occurs but the photostating petitio does not occur is wrong.; sent14 & assump2 -> int1: the wowing unperceptiveness does not occur.; assump1 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump2] & int2 -> int3: the juicelessness occurs and the photostating petitio does not occur.; sent2 & int3 -> int4: the conjugation happens.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__