that the march does not fragment hold.
sent1: that the Bartlett is not a operon if something is not a knock is right. sent2: that the oriel does expire absoluteness and is a masquerade is wrong. sent3: if the ceriman does not collogue nucleus then it is a Epiphany and it is a slaver. sent4: that the keratohyalin scowls and it is a fragment is not false if that the ceriman is not untranslatable hold. sent5: the march is a kind of a fragment if the keratohyalin is a fragment. sent6: the ceriman is not a kind of a fragment if it is not untranslatable. sent7: if there exists something such that it collogues nucleus then the ptarmigan is a kind of a slaver. sent8: the fact that the idolizer does not knock is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it does expire absoluteness and is a masquerade is incorrect. sent9: the keratohyalin is untranslatable if it is not high-resolution and it does not expire morganite. sent10: that the keratohyalin is not a fragment but it is untranslatable is not correct if the march is untranslatable. sent11: if the keratohyalin is untranslatable then that the ceriman does not scowl and is untranslatable does not hold. sent12: the ceriman does not collogue nucleus. sent13: the keratohyalin is not high-resolution and does not expire morganite. sent14: the ceriman is a kind of a slaver. sent15: the march is not a kind of a fragment if either the boatbill is a benefit or it minstrels glomerulus or both. sent16: something collogues nucleus if it does perorate. sent17: if the march is not lumbosacral it minstrels glomerulus. sent18: something does not expire morganite but it is a benefit. sent19: the ceriman is not untranslatable if the fact that the boatbill is both not a hold and not untranslatable is incorrect. sent20: if the fact that something is a slaver hold it does benefit. sent21: something collogues nucleus if it is an immune. sent22: something does perorate and/or is a kind of an immune if it is not a operon. sent23: The nucleus does not collogue ceriman. sent24: the fact that something is not a hold and it is not untranslatable is incorrect if it is a Epiphany. sent25: something is not a hold if that it does not scowl and is untranslatable is not right. sent26: the ceriman is not a fragment but it is a kind of a slaver. sent27: there exists something such that it is a hold and is a Epiphany.
sent9 & sent13 -> int1: the keratohyalin is untranslatable.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the ceriman does not scowl and is untranslatable does not hold.; sent25 -> int3: if the fact that the ceriman does not scowl but it is not translatable is not correct it is not a kind of a hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ceriman is not a kind of a hold.; sent3 & sent12 -> int5: the ceriman is both a Epiphany and a slaver.; int5 -> int6: the ceriman is a Epiphany.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the ceriman is both not a hold and a Epiphany.; int7 -> int8: something is not a hold but a Epiphany.;
the march is a fragment.
sent24 -> int9: the fact that the boatbill is not a kind of a hold and it is not untranslatable is false if it is a kind of a Epiphany.; sent20 -> int10: the ptarmigan does benefit if it is a slaver.; sent22 -> int11: the Bartlett either does perorate or is immune or both if it is not a kind of a operon.; sent2 -> int12: there exists something such that that it does expire absoluteness and masquerades is not right.; int12 & sent8 -> int13: the idolizer is not a knock.; int13 -> int14: there exists something such that it is not a knock.; int14 & sent1 -> int15: the Bartlett is not a kind of a operon.; int11 & int15 -> int16: the Bartlett either perorates or is immune or both.; sent16 -> int17: the Bartlett does collogue nucleus if it does perorate.; sent21 -> int18: the Bartlett collogues nucleus if it is an immune.; int16 & int17 & int18 -> int19: the Bartlett does collogue nucleus.; int19 -> int20: there is something such that it does collogue nucleus.; int20 & sent7 -> int21: the ptarmigan is a slaver.; int10 & int21 -> int22: the ptarmigan is a benefit.; int22 -> int23: something is a benefit.;
$hypothesis$ = that the march does not fragment hold. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Bartlett is not a operon if something is not a knock is right. sent2: that the oriel does expire absoluteness and is a masquerade is wrong. sent3: if the ceriman does not collogue nucleus then it is a Epiphany and it is a slaver. sent4: that the keratohyalin scowls and it is a fragment is not false if that the ceriman is not untranslatable hold. sent5: the march is a kind of a fragment if the keratohyalin is a fragment. sent6: the ceriman is not a kind of a fragment if it is not untranslatable. sent7: if there exists something such that it collogues nucleus then the ptarmigan is a kind of a slaver. sent8: the fact that the idolizer does not knock is not incorrect if there is something such that the fact that it does expire absoluteness and is a masquerade is incorrect. sent9: the keratohyalin is untranslatable if it is not high-resolution and it does not expire morganite. sent10: that the keratohyalin is not a fragment but it is untranslatable is not correct if the march is untranslatable. sent11: if the keratohyalin is untranslatable then that the ceriman does not scowl and is untranslatable does not hold. sent12: the ceriman does not collogue nucleus. sent13: the keratohyalin is not high-resolution and does not expire morganite. sent14: the ceriman is a kind of a slaver. sent15: the march is not a kind of a fragment if either the boatbill is a benefit or it minstrels glomerulus or both. sent16: something collogues nucleus if it does perorate. sent17: if the march is not lumbosacral it minstrels glomerulus. sent18: something does not expire morganite but it is a benefit. sent19: the ceriman is not untranslatable if the fact that the boatbill is both not a hold and not untranslatable is incorrect. sent20: if the fact that something is a slaver hold it does benefit. sent21: something collogues nucleus if it is an immune. sent22: something does perorate and/or is a kind of an immune if it is not a operon. sent23: The nucleus does not collogue ceriman. sent24: the fact that something is not a hold and it is not untranslatable is incorrect if it is a Epiphany. sent25: something is not a hold if that it does not scowl and is untranslatable is not right. sent26: the ceriman is not a fragment but it is a kind of a slaver. sent27: there exists something such that it is a hold and is a Epiphany. ; $proof$ = 
sent9 & sent13 -> int1: the keratohyalin is untranslatable.; int1 & sent11 -> int2: the fact that the ceriman does not scowl and is untranslatable does not hold.; sent25 -> int3: if the fact that the ceriman does not scowl but it is not translatable is not correct it is not a kind of a hold.; int2 & int3 -> int4: the ceriman is not a kind of a hold.; sent3 & sent12 -> int5: the ceriman is both a Epiphany and a slaver.; int5 -> int6: the ceriman is a Epiphany.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the ceriman is both not a hold and a Epiphany.; int7 -> int8: something is not a hold but a Epiphany.; __UNKNOWN__