the narrowing is residual.
sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is residual and it is legal is not correct. sent2: if the felon is a residual and it is legal the narrowing is not broadband. sent3: if the felon does not cremate felon then the narrowing does not cremate felon and it is not legal. sent4: if something that does not cremate felon is not legal then it is a kind of a residual. sent5: the wreckfish does not cremate felon and it is not a kind of a Santalum. sent6: the chlorate is a kind of a tendentiousness. sent7: the griot does cremate felon. sent8: the felon is incomparable but it does not nestle. sent9: the fact that the wreckfish is not a Santalum and is not a Psilotum is wrong. sent10: the felon is an enslavement and is unsuccessful. sent11: the narrowing is not a atomism. sent12: if the fact that the wreckfish is not a Santalum and it is not a kind of a atomism is not true it is xenogeneic. sent13: the bearskin is not broadband if the fact that it is broadband and does not cremate felon is not right. sent14: if the narrowing cremates felon it does exempt Bombycidae. sent15: if something is not broadband then it is a Psilotum that does not cremate felon. sent16: that something is a kind of broadband thing that does not cremate felon is false if it is not a kind of a Psilotum. sent17: the narrowing is a kind of a residual if it does cremate felon and it is not legal. sent18: the wreckfish is xenogeneic if the fact that it is not broadband and not a tendentiousness is not true. sent19: if the chlorate is a kind of a tendentiousness then the wreckfish does exempt Bombycidae. sent20: the felon is not broadband if the wreckfish is not non-xenogeneic and exempts Bombycidae. sent21: something is not non-residual if it cremates felon and it is not legal. sent22: if the felon is not broadband then it is a Psilotum. sent23: the narrowing is non-xenogeneic and it does not cremate felon if the wreckfish is not non-xenogeneic. sent24: that the wreckfish is not a Santalum and it is not a atomism does not hold. sent25: the tobacco is not broadband. sent26: if something is not broadband then that it is a Psilotum hold.
sent12 & sent24 -> int1: the wreckfish is xenogeneic.; sent19 & sent6 -> int2: the wreckfish exempts Bombycidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wreckfish is xenogeneic and it does exempt Bombycidae.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the felon is not broadband.; sent15 -> int5: if the felon is not broadband then it is a Psilotum and does not cremate felon.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the felon is a Psilotum but it does not cremate felon.; int6 -> int7: the felon does not cremate felon.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the narrowing does not cremate felon and it is not legal.; sent4 -> int9: if the fact that the narrowing does not cremate felon and is not legal is not incorrect it is a residual.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis;
the bearskin is not a atomism.
sent16 -> int10: the fact that the bearskin is a kind of broadband thing that does not cremate felon is incorrect if it is not a kind of a Psilotum.;
$hypothesis$ = the narrowing is residual. ; $context$ = sent1: there is something such that the fact that it is residual and it is legal is not correct. sent2: if the felon is a residual and it is legal the narrowing is not broadband. sent3: if the felon does not cremate felon then the narrowing does not cremate felon and it is not legal. sent4: if something that does not cremate felon is not legal then it is a kind of a residual. sent5: the wreckfish does not cremate felon and it is not a kind of a Santalum. sent6: the chlorate is a kind of a tendentiousness. sent7: the griot does cremate felon. sent8: the felon is incomparable but it does not nestle. sent9: the fact that the wreckfish is not a Santalum and is not a Psilotum is wrong. sent10: the felon is an enslavement and is unsuccessful. sent11: the narrowing is not a atomism. sent12: if the fact that the wreckfish is not a Santalum and it is not a kind of a atomism is not true it is xenogeneic. sent13: the bearskin is not broadband if the fact that it is broadband and does not cremate felon is not right. sent14: if the narrowing cremates felon it does exempt Bombycidae. sent15: if something is not broadband then it is a Psilotum that does not cremate felon. sent16: that something is a kind of broadband thing that does not cremate felon is false if it is not a kind of a Psilotum. sent17: the narrowing is a kind of a residual if it does cremate felon and it is not legal. sent18: the wreckfish is xenogeneic if the fact that it is not broadband and not a tendentiousness is not true. sent19: if the chlorate is a kind of a tendentiousness then the wreckfish does exempt Bombycidae. sent20: the felon is not broadband if the wreckfish is not non-xenogeneic and exempts Bombycidae. sent21: something is not non-residual if it cremates felon and it is not legal. sent22: if the felon is not broadband then it is a Psilotum. sent23: the narrowing is non-xenogeneic and it does not cremate felon if the wreckfish is not non-xenogeneic. sent24: that the wreckfish is not a Santalum and it is not a atomism does not hold. sent25: the tobacco is not broadband. sent26: if something is not broadband then that it is a Psilotum hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent24 -> int1: the wreckfish is xenogeneic.; sent19 & sent6 -> int2: the wreckfish exempts Bombycidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the wreckfish is xenogeneic and it does exempt Bombycidae.; int3 & sent20 -> int4: the felon is not broadband.; sent15 -> int5: if the felon is not broadband then it is a Psilotum and does not cremate felon.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the felon is a Psilotum but it does not cremate felon.; int6 -> int7: the felon does not cremate felon.; int7 & sent3 -> int8: the narrowing does not cremate felon and it is not legal.; sent4 -> int9: if the fact that the narrowing does not cremate felon and is not legal is not incorrect it is a residual.; int8 & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__