the channel occurs.
sent1: the damaging enterostomy does not occur and the on-lineness does not occur if that the channeling does not occur hold. sent2: that the uncreativeness occurs brings about that that the damaging sandpaper does not occur and the bethinking blindfold happens is correct. sent3: that the damaging sandpaper does not occur results in that both the bethinking projectionist and the victimization happens. sent4: the uncreativeness occurs. sent5: if the vasotomy does not occur then the fact that the bethinking projectionist does not occur hold. sent6: that the heartbeat does not occur prevents the vasotomy. sent7: the catholicizing does not occur but the counting happens. sent8: if the damaging enterostomy does not occur and the on-lineness does not occur the heartbeat does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the channel does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the damaging enterostomy does not occur and the on-lineness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the heartbeat does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the vasotomy does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the bethinking projectionist does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int5: the damaging sandpaper does not occur but the bethinking blindfold happens.; int5 -> int6: the damaging sandpaper does not occur.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the bethinking projectionist happens and the victimization happens.; int7 -> int8: the bethinking projectionist happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the channel occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the damaging enterostomy does not occur and the on-lineness does not occur if that the channeling does not occur hold. sent2: that the uncreativeness occurs brings about that that the damaging sandpaper does not occur and the bethinking blindfold happens is correct. sent3: that the damaging sandpaper does not occur results in that both the bethinking projectionist and the victimization happens. sent4: the uncreativeness occurs. sent5: if the vasotomy does not occur then the fact that the bethinking projectionist does not occur hold. sent6: that the heartbeat does not occur prevents the vasotomy. sent7: the catholicizing does not occur but the counting happens. sent8: if the damaging enterostomy does not occur and the on-lineness does not occur the heartbeat does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the channel does not occur.; sent1 & assump1 -> int1: the damaging enterostomy does not occur and the on-lineness does not occur.; int1 & sent8 -> int2: the heartbeat does not occur.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the fact that the vasotomy does not occur is not incorrect.; int3 & sent5 -> int4: the bethinking projectionist does not occur.; sent2 & sent4 -> int5: the damaging sandpaper does not occur but the bethinking blindfold happens.; int5 -> int6: the damaging sandpaper does not occur.; sent3 & int6 -> int7: the bethinking projectionist happens and the victimization happens.; int7 -> int8: the bethinking projectionist happens.; int4 & int8 -> int9: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__