the intervention does not occur.
sent1: if the marshaling video does not occur the fact that both the preoccupying Nut and the Tobagonian occurs does not hold. sent2: if the marking scar happens and/or the marking Domitian occurs then that the serialization does not occur is correct. sent3: that the intervention happens is triggered by that the none does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the none but not the marking impairer happens does not hold the intervention occurs. sent5: if the dispensableness does not occur the serialization happens and the mesentericness happens. sent6: that the fact that the none but not the marking impairer occurs is not right if the marking scar does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the marking misanthropy does not occur if that both the dispensableness and the mesentericness happens does not hold. sent8: if that the eightsome occurs and the stipulation happens is wrong the jolt does not occur. sent9: both the non-artiodactylness and the elimination happens. sent10: the marking misanthropy occurs and the rummy happens if the marking warble does not occur. sent11: the bacteremicness happens. sent12: that both the non-artiodactylness and the elimination happens prevents the marking warble. sent13: that the dispensableness happens and the mesentericness occurs is incorrect if the fact that the serialization does not occur is correct. sent14: the rummy happens if the marking warble does not occur. sent15: if the serialization happens then that the marking scar does not occur but the marking Domitian happens is not correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the marking scar happens.; assump1 -> int1: the marking scar happens and/or the marking Domitian happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the serialization does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: that the dispensableness and the mesentericness occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the marking misanthropy does not occur.; sent12 & sent9 -> int5: the marking warble does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the marking misanthropy occurs and the rummy happens.; int6 -> int7: the marking misanthropy occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the marking scar does not occur.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the fact that the none but not the marking impairer happens is not correct.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis;
the intervention does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the intervention does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: if the marshaling video does not occur the fact that both the preoccupying Nut and the Tobagonian occurs does not hold. sent2: if the marking scar happens and/or the marking Domitian occurs then that the serialization does not occur is correct. sent3: that the intervention happens is triggered by that the none does not occur. sent4: if the fact that the none but not the marking impairer happens does not hold the intervention occurs. sent5: if the dispensableness does not occur the serialization happens and the mesentericness happens. sent6: that the fact that the none but not the marking impairer occurs is not right if the marking scar does not occur is not wrong. sent7: the marking misanthropy does not occur if that both the dispensableness and the mesentericness happens does not hold. sent8: if that the eightsome occurs and the stipulation happens is wrong the jolt does not occur. sent9: both the non-artiodactylness and the elimination happens. sent10: the marking misanthropy occurs and the rummy happens if the marking warble does not occur. sent11: the bacteremicness happens. sent12: that both the non-artiodactylness and the elimination happens prevents the marking warble. sent13: that the dispensableness happens and the mesentericness occurs is incorrect if the fact that the serialization does not occur is correct. sent14: the rummy happens if the marking warble does not occur. sent15: if the serialization happens then that the marking scar does not occur but the marking Domitian happens is not correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the marking scar happens.; assump1 -> int1: the marking scar happens and/or the marking Domitian happens.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the serialization does not occur.; int2 & sent13 -> int3: that the dispensableness and the mesentericness occurs does not hold.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the marking misanthropy does not occur.; sent12 & sent9 -> int5: the marking warble does not occur.; sent10 & int5 -> int6: the marking misanthropy occurs and the rummy happens.; int6 -> int7: the marking misanthropy occurs.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: the marking scar does not occur.; int9 & sent6 -> int10: the fact that the none but not the marking impairer happens is not correct.; int10 & sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__