the thunderstorm occurs.
sent1: the Concord happens. sent2: that both the astronavigation and the nosocomialness happens is caused by that the gyralness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the atrophicness does not occur is true. sent4: the fact that both the acyclicness and the non-postmortemness happens does not hold if the rambling does not occur. sent5: the thunderstorm does not occur and the directedness does not occur if the nosocomialness happens. sent6: the introduction does not occur. sent7: the infection does not occur. sent8: the tusking Ta'ziyeh does not occur if that both the rationalization and the non-Nicaraguanness happens is wrong. sent9: that the photographicness but not the checkmating occurs is false if the thunderstorm does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the Simonizing fire-bush but not the griping happens is not true then the hemolyticness does not occur. sent11: the overspill occurs. sent12: that the fete does not occur hold if the patter does not occur. sent13: the fact that the tropicalness but not the perfusion happens is wrong if the vaporization does not occur. sent14: the fact that the quadraticsness occurs hold. sent15: the antiferromagnetism occurs. sent16: the fact that the hilarness but not the dogmatizing occurs is not right. sent17: the directedness occurs. sent18: the fact that the Nicaraguan happens is not wrong. sent19: if that both the profitableness and the non-associationalness occurs is not true the lesserness does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thunderstorm does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the photographicness occurs but the checkmating does not occur is wrong.;
the thunderstorm does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the thunderstorm occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the Concord happens. sent2: that both the astronavigation and the nosocomialness happens is caused by that the gyralness does not occur. sent3: the fact that the atrophicness does not occur is true. sent4: the fact that both the acyclicness and the non-postmortemness happens does not hold if the rambling does not occur. sent5: the thunderstorm does not occur and the directedness does not occur if the nosocomialness happens. sent6: the introduction does not occur. sent7: the infection does not occur. sent8: the tusking Ta'ziyeh does not occur if that both the rationalization and the non-Nicaraguanness happens is wrong. sent9: that the photographicness but not the checkmating occurs is false if the thunderstorm does not occur. sent10: if the fact that the Simonizing fire-bush but not the griping happens is not true then the hemolyticness does not occur. sent11: the overspill occurs. sent12: that the fete does not occur hold if the patter does not occur. sent13: the fact that the tropicalness but not the perfusion happens is wrong if the vaporization does not occur. sent14: the fact that the quadraticsness occurs hold. sent15: the antiferromagnetism occurs. sent16: the fact that the hilarness but not the dogmatizing occurs is not right. sent17: the directedness occurs. sent18: the fact that the Nicaraguan happens is not wrong. sent19: if that both the profitableness and the non-associationalness occurs is not true the lesserness does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the thunderstorm does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the photographicness occurs but the checkmating does not occur is wrong.; __UNKNOWN__