the fact that the pruning happens and the depressurizing Fugard happens is not right.
sent1: the fact that the liberation does not occur but the crediting spiccato happens does not hold. sent2: the Chaldean does not occur if that the depressurizing monolatry but not the nonobservance occurs does not hold. sent3: that the attitude does not occur is prevented by that the workflow occurs. sent4: the attainment and/or the workflow happens. sent5: the inoperableness does not occur if the attitude happens. sent6: the neurogenicness does not occur and the algometricness does not occur if the Chaldeanness does not occur. sent7: the attitude happens if the attainment occurs. sent8: that the pruning happens is triggered by that not the inoperableness but the impermeableness occurs. sent9: if the fact that the liberation does not occur but the crediting spiccato happens is wrong the impermeableness occurs. sent10: that the depressurizing monolatry happens and the nonobservance does not occur is incorrect. sent11: if the algometricness does not occur then the depressurizing Fugard happens.
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the Chaldean does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: both the non-neurogenicness and the non-algometricness happens.; int2 -> int3: the algometricness does not occur.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the depressurizing Fugard occurs.; sent4 & sent7 & sent3 -> int5: the attitude occurs.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the inoperableness does not occur is not wrong.; sent9 & sent1 -> int7: the impermeableness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the operableness and the impermeableness happens.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the pruning happens.; int4 & int9 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pruning happens and the depressurizing Fugard happens is not right. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the liberation does not occur but the crediting spiccato happens does not hold. sent2: the Chaldean does not occur if that the depressurizing monolatry but not the nonobservance occurs does not hold. sent3: that the attitude does not occur is prevented by that the workflow occurs. sent4: the attainment and/or the workflow happens. sent5: the inoperableness does not occur if the attitude happens. sent6: the neurogenicness does not occur and the algometricness does not occur if the Chaldeanness does not occur. sent7: the attitude happens if the attainment occurs. sent8: that the pruning happens is triggered by that not the inoperableness but the impermeableness occurs. sent9: if the fact that the liberation does not occur but the crediting spiccato happens is wrong the impermeableness occurs. sent10: that the depressurizing monolatry happens and the nonobservance does not occur is incorrect. sent11: if the algometricness does not occur then the depressurizing Fugard happens. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 & sent10 -> int1: the Chaldean does not occur.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: both the non-neurogenicness and the non-algometricness happens.; int2 -> int3: the algometricness does not occur.; int3 & sent11 -> int4: the depressurizing Fugard occurs.; sent4 & sent7 & sent3 -> int5: the attitude occurs.; sent5 & int5 -> int6: that the inoperableness does not occur is not wrong.; sent9 & sent1 -> int7: the impermeableness occurs.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the operableness and the impermeableness happens.; sent8 & int8 -> int9: the pruning happens.; int4 & int9 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__