that the recessionariness but not the stabilization occurs is brought about by the jellifying mining.
sent1: if the butchery and the preempting manikin occurs then the jig does not occur. sent2: the genitourinariness occurs. sent3: the calamity and the capitalizing happens. sent4: that both the preempting phylloquinone and the macrocephalicness occurs hold. sent5: the acceptableness occurs if the genitourinariness occurs. sent6: the exceeding currency happens and the recessionariness happens. sent7: if the palatalness and the jellifying demonstration occurs then the preempting neurohormone occurs.
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the acceptableness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stabilization happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the acceptableness and the stabilization happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the jellifying mining happens.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the recessionariness happens is not incorrect.;
$hypothesis$ = that the recessionariness but not the stabilization occurs is brought about by the jellifying mining. ; $context$ = sent1: if the butchery and the preempting manikin occurs then the jig does not occur. sent2: the genitourinariness occurs. sent3: the calamity and the capitalizing happens. sent4: that both the preempting phylloquinone and the macrocephalicness occurs hold. sent5: the acceptableness occurs if the genitourinariness occurs. sent6: the exceeding currency happens and the recessionariness happens. sent7: if the palatalness and the jellifying demonstration occurs then the preempting neurohormone occurs. ; $proof$ = 
sent5 & sent2 -> int1: the acceptableness happens.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the stabilization happens.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the acceptableness and the stabilization happens.; void -> assump2: Let's assume that the jellifying mining happens.; sent6 -> int3: the fact that the recessionariness happens is not incorrect.; __UNKNOWN__