if the nonsectarianness occurs the collaring stringer occurs.
sent1: the surficialness does not occur and the adjudication does not occur. sent2: the collaring Higi does not occur. sent3: that the nonsectarianness happens prevents that the clear-cutting does not occur. sent4: the collaring stringer happens if the clear-cutting and the non-surficialness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonsectarianness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the clear-cutting happens.; sent1 -> int2: the surficialness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the clear-cutting happens and the surficialness does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the collaring stringer occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = if the nonsectarianness occurs the collaring stringer occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the surficialness does not occur and the adjudication does not occur. sent2: the collaring Higi does not occur. sent3: that the nonsectarianness happens prevents that the clear-cutting does not occur. sent4: the collaring stringer happens if the clear-cutting and the non-surficialness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the nonsectarianness happens.; sent3 & assump1 -> int1: the clear-cutting happens.; sent1 -> int2: the surficialness does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the clear-cutting happens and the surficialness does not occur.; int3 & sent4 -> int4: the collaring stringer occurs.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__