the whisk is not a kind of a catalyst.
sent1: the roofing stubs hydrazoite if the tread does not curb candlelight and it does not interpose fluvastatin. sent2: if the whisk is lumbar then the roofing is not allomorphic. sent3: something is lumbar if the fact that it is a catalyst is right. sent4: something does not stub hydrazoite if it is malodorous. sent5: everything does not curb candlelight. sent6: the roofing is non-allomorphic thing that is malodorous if the whisk is not non-lumbar. sent7: if the roofing is not a catalyst then the Edda is a kind of non-lumbar thing that is a kind of a wonderland. sent8: the roofing is not allomorphic. sent9: the tread does not interpose fluvastatin. sent10: The fluvastatin does not interpose tread. sent11: the spadix is not lumbar.
sent3 -> int1: the whisk is lumbar if it is a kind of a catalyst.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whisk is a catalyst.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the whisk is lumbar.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the roofing is not allomorphic but it is malodorous.; int3 -> int4: the roofing is not non-malodorous.; sent4 -> int5: if the roofing is malodorous it does not stub hydrazoite.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the roofing does not stub hydrazoite.; sent5 -> int7: the tread does not curb candlelight.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the tread does not curb candlelight and does not interpose fluvastatin.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the roofing does stub hydrazoite.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the Edda is non-lumbar a wonderland is right.
$hypothesis$ = the whisk is not a kind of a catalyst. ; $context$ = sent1: the roofing stubs hydrazoite if the tread does not curb candlelight and it does not interpose fluvastatin. sent2: if the whisk is lumbar then the roofing is not allomorphic. sent3: something is lumbar if the fact that it is a catalyst is right. sent4: something does not stub hydrazoite if it is malodorous. sent5: everything does not curb candlelight. sent6: the roofing is non-allomorphic thing that is malodorous if the whisk is not non-lumbar. sent7: if the roofing is not a catalyst then the Edda is a kind of non-lumbar thing that is a kind of a wonderland. sent8: the roofing is not allomorphic. sent9: the tread does not interpose fluvastatin. sent10: The fluvastatin does not interpose tread. sent11: the spadix is not lumbar. ; $proof$ = 
sent3 -> int1: the whisk is lumbar if it is a kind of a catalyst.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the whisk is a catalyst.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the whisk is lumbar.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the roofing is not allomorphic but it is malodorous.; int3 -> int4: the roofing is not non-malodorous.; sent4 -> int5: if the roofing is malodorous it does not stub hydrazoite.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the roofing does not stub hydrazoite.; sent5 -> int7: the tread does not curb candlelight.; int7 & sent9 -> int8: the tread does not curb candlelight and does not interpose fluvastatin.; sent1 & int8 -> int9: the roofing does stub hydrazoite.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__