the fact that either the stigmatizing cub does not occur or the archivalness does not occur or both does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the Somalian occurs but the excising Sax does not occur is false the euphoniousness happens. sent2: that the open-sourceness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the Somalian does not occur that the euphoniousness and the backhandedness happens is not false. sent4: the Somalian does not occur. sent5: the stigmatizing Nergal does not occur. sent6: the stigmatizing cub does not occur or the archivalness happens or both. sent7: the Neapolitanness happens. sent8: the perplexing Hollerith does not occur and/or the stigmatizing Alternanthera does not occur. sent9: the Neapolitan does not occur if the purifying occurs. sent10: if the purifying happens then the fact that the stigmatizing cub does not occur or the archivalness does not occur or both is not true. sent11: the euphoniousness happens if the fact that the Somalianness does not occur is true. sent12: the non-Neapolitanness and/or the non-malignantness happens if the backhandedness does not occur. sent13: the nonindulgentness does not occur. sent14: the relinquishment does not occur. sent15: the retirement and the excising sandiness happens. sent16: either the stigmatizing cub happens or the archivalness does not occur or both. sent17: the art happens. sent18: the euphoniousness occurs. sent19: the fact that the stigmatizing cub does not occur is correct if not the malignantness but the backhandedness occurs. sent20: the fritter does not occur but the tsking happens. sent21: the fact that the philosophicness does not occur is right. sent22: that the Neapolitan does not occur is not wrong if the purifying happens and/or the malignantness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malignantness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the purifying or the malignantness or both occurs.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the Neapolitanness does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the malignantness does not occur.; sent3 & sent4 -> int5: the euphoniousness and the backhanded happens.; int5 -> int6: the backhanded happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that both the non-malignantness and the backhandedness occurs hold.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the stigmatizing cub does not occur.; int8 -> hypothesis;
that the stigmatizing cub does not occur or the archivalness does not occur or both is not right.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that either the stigmatizing cub does not occur or the archivalness does not occur or both does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Somalian occurs but the excising Sax does not occur is false the euphoniousness happens. sent2: that the open-sourceness does not occur is not incorrect. sent3: if the Somalian does not occur that the euphoniousness and the backhandedness happens is not false. sent4: the Somalian does not occur. sent5: the stigmatizing Nergal does not occur. sent6: the stigmatizing cub does not occur or the archivalness happens or both. sent7: the Neapolitanness happens. sent8: the perplexing Hollerith does not occur and/or the stigmatizing Alternanthera does not occur. sent9: the Neapolitan does not occur if the purifying occurs. sent10: if the purifying happens then the fact that the stigmatizing cub does not occur or the archivalness does not occur or both is not true. sent11: the euphoniousness happens if the fact that the Somalianness does not occur is true. sent12: the non-Neapolitanness and/or the non-malignantness happens if the backhandedness does not occur. sent13: the nonindulgentness does not occur. sent14: the relinquishment does not occur. sent15: the retirement and the excising sandiness happens. sent16: either the stigmatizing cub happens or the archivalness does not occur or both. sent17: the art happens. sent18: the euphoniousness occurs. sent19: the fact that the stigmatizing cub does not occur is correct if not the malignantness but the backhandedness occurs. sent20: the fritter does not occur but the tsking happens. sent21: the fact that the philosophicness does not occur is right. sent22: that the Neapolitan does not occur is not wrong if the purifying happens and/or the malignantness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the malignantness occurs.; assump1 -> int1: the purifying or the malignantness or both occurs.; int1 & sent22 -> int2: the Neapolitanness does not occur.; int2 & sent7 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the malignantness does not occur.; sent3 & sent4 -> int5: the euphoniousness and the backhanded happens.; int5 -> int6: the backhanded happens.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the fact that both the non-malignantness and the backhandedness occurs hold.; int7 & sent19 -> int8: the stigmatizing cub does not occur.; int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__