that there exists something such that if it is non-invertible the fact that it is a ptyalism and it does not service Hunan is wrong is false.
sent1: the counterfeit is a kind of a ptyalism but it does not service Hunan if it is non-invertible. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is stimulative hold the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Arecidae that is not centigrade is true is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-invertible it is a kind of a ptyalism and it does not service Hunan. sent4: if the counterfeit is not non-non-invertible then the fact that it is a ptyalism and does not service Hunan is not correct. sent5: if something is a cowled then the fact that it is a kind of non-invertible thing that does not scent Pisonia does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is behavioral the fact that it compels biscuit and it is not a tropopause does not hold. sent7: the fact that that the counterfeit is non-invertible and is not a kind of a salutatory hold is not true if it is bureaucratic. sent8: there is something such that if it does scent striped then the fact that it does clap and it does not moderate is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it is non-invertible then the fact that that it is a ptyalism and it services Hunan is right is not right. sent10: if that the counterfeit is not non-non-invertible is not incorrect that it is a ptyalism and services Hunan is wrong.
sent4 -> hypothesis;
if the arrow is a cowled that it is not non-non-invertible and does not scent Pisonia is incorrect.
sent5 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if it is non-invertible the fact that it is a ptyalism and it does not service Hunan is wrong is false. ; $context$ = sent1: the counterfeit is a kind of a ptyalism but it does not service Hunan if it is non-invertible. sent2: there is something such that if the fact that it is stimulative hold the fact that the fact that it is a kind of a Arecidae that is not centigrade is true is false. sent3: there is something such that if it is non-invertible it is a kind of a ptyalism and it does not service Hunan. sent4: if the counterfeit is not non-non-invertible then the fact that it is a ptyalism and does not service Hunan is not correct. sent5: if something is a cowled then the fact that it is a kind of non-invertible thing that does not scent Pisonia does not hold. sent6: there is something such that if it is behavioral the fact that it compels biscuit and it is not a tropopause does not hold. sent7: the fact that that the counterfeit is non-invertible and is not a kind of a salutatory hold is not true if it is bureaucratic. sent8: there is something such that if it does scent striped then the fact that it does clap and it does not moderate is wrong. sent9: there is something such that if it is non-invertible then the fact that that it is a ptyalism and it services Hunan is right is not right. sent10: if that the counterfeit is not non-non-invertible is not incorrect that it is a ptyalism and services Hunan is wrong. ; $proof$ = 
sent4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__