the surbase is not a oilcloth.
sent1: if that the Neapolitan does not evaporate hold the fact that the hookah is a kind of non-anthropic thing that does not evaporate is not true. sent2: if the anopheline is a NATO then the iconography is cool. sent3: if the fact that the transaminase is not a stone and it is not a foray is not correct it is a foray. sent4: if the hookah is not a kind of a canvas then the iconography is either anthropic or a oilcloth or both. sent5: the cannikin is not a cool if the fact that the Neapolitan is not a NATO and does not evaporate does not hold. sent6: if the transaminase is a foray then the host is not a Brotulidae but it is abolitionary. sent7: if the fact that the scaup does not ebb scaup is not false then that the fact that the iconography does cool and it is a kind of a canvas is not false is incorrect. sent8: the iconography is not a cool if the fact that it cool and canvases does not hold. sent9: if that the hookah is not anthropic and it does not evaporate is wrong then the fact that the surbase is not a kind of a oilcloth is not wrong. sent10: That the scaup does not ebb scaup hold. sent11: if the Neapolitan evaporates the fact that the anopheline is a NATO hold. sent12: the transaminase is not a Mauritanian. sent13: if something is not a kind of a Mauritanian then that that it is not a stone and not a foray is correct is not correct. sent14: if the surbase ebbs scaup then the hookah is not a canvas. sent15: that the scaup does not ebb scaup hold. sent16: if the scaup does ebb scaup then the surbase does ebb scaup.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Neapolitan does evaporate.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the anopheline is a NATO.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the iconography is a cool.; sent7 & sent15 -> int3: that the fact that the iconography is a cool and it canvases does not hold hold.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the iconography is not cool is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Neapolitan does not evaporate.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the hookah is non-anthropic thing that does not evaporate is not right.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the cannikin is not a cool.
sent13 -> int8: if the transaminase is not a Mauritanian then that it is not a stone and is not a kind of a foray is not right.; int8 & sent12 -> int9: the fact that the transaminase is not a stone and not a foray is not right.; sent3 & int9 -> int10: the transaminase is a foray.; sent6 & int10 -> int11: the host is not a Brotulidae but it is abolitionary.; int11 -> int12: there exists something such that it is not a kind of a Brotulidae and is abolitionary.;
$hypothesis$ = the surbase is not a oilcloth. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the Neapolitan does not evaporate hold the fact that the hookah is a kind of non-anthropic thing that does not evaporate is not true. sent2: if the anopheline is a NATO then the iconography is cool. sent3: if the fact that the transaminase is not a stone and it is not a foray is not correct it is a foray. sent4: if the hookah is not a kind of a canvas then the iconography is either anthropic or a oilcloth or both. sent5: the cannikin is not a cool if the fact that the Neapolitan is not a NATO and does not evaporate does not hold. sent6: if the transaminase is a foray then the host is not a Brotulidae but it is abolitionary. sent7: if the fact that the scaup does not ebb scaup is not false then that the fact that the iconography does cool and it is a kind of a canvas is not false is incorrect. sent8: the iconography is not a cool if the fact that it cool and canvases does not hold. sent9: if that the hookah is not anthropic and it does not evaporate is wrong then the fact that the surbase is not a kind of a oilcloth is not wrong. sent10: That the scaup does not ebb scaup hold. sent11: if the Neapolitan evaporates the fact that the anopheline is a NATO hold. sent12: the transaminase is not a Mauritanian. sent13: if something is not a kind of a Mauritanian then that that it is not a stone and not a foray is correct is not correct. sent14: if the surbase ebbs scaup then the hookah is not a canvas. sent15: that the scaup does not ebb scaup hold. sent16: if the scaup does ebb scaup then the surbase does ebb scaup. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Neapolitan does evaporate.; sent11 & assump1 -> int1: the anopheline is a NATO.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the iconography is a cool.; sent7 & sent15 -> int3: that the fact that the iconography is a cool and it canvases does not hold hold.; sent8 & int3 -> int4: the fact that the iconography is not cool is true.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> int6: the Neapolitan does not evaporate.; int6 & sent1 -> int7: the fact that the hookah is non-anthropic thing that does not evaporate is not right.; int7 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__