the subjectivist browses.
sent1: if the subjectivist does not complete then the fact that it deflates kern and is a controversy is not correct. sent2: something that does not suspend is both a squeezer and categorematic. sent3: the klutz is not categorematic if the waterside is androgenic. sent4: the subjectivist is complete if the waterside complete. sent5: the klutz spirals cheesecloth if the owner-driver is not on-the-job but it does spirals cheesecloth. sent6: the fact that if the klutz is not categorematic the owner-driver is categorematic and/or does not suspend hold. sent7: if that something does deflate kern but it is not a controversy does not hold then it is a browse. sent8: there is something such that that it is a private and it does not deflate owner-driver is wrong. sent9: something does not suspend if it does complete. sent10: the owner-driver is not on-the-job but it spirals cheesecloth if the nucleolus deflates owner-driver. sent11: the waterside does not browse if the fact that the subjectivist is androgenic but it is not a thoracotomy is false. sent12: the subjectivist is a controversy and/or it is androgenic if the waterside is not a controversy. sent13: if the subjectivist is not complete that it does deflate kern and is not a controversy is wrong. sent14: that the subjectivist is a controversy and it is categorematic does not hold. sent15: the nucleolus does deflate owner-driver if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a private and it does not deflate owner-driver is incorrect. sent16: the waterside is not a controversy if something is non-calyptrate thing that is tropical. sent17: the subjectivist is not complete if the owner-driver does not suspend. sent18: the klutz is not categorematic if that the waterside is a kind of a thoracotomy and is not androgenic is wrong. sent19: that the waterside is a thoracotomy and it is androgenic is not right if it is a kind of a squeezer. sent20: the waterside is a squeezer. sent21: if the klutz does spiral cheesecloth then it is not calyptrate and it is tropical. sent22: if something is a squeezer then it is not a browse. sent23: something is complete or it does deflate kern or both if it is not a controversy. sent24: if the waterside is a squeezer the fact that it is a thoracotomy but not androgenic does not hold. sent25: the owner-driver is a browse.
sent24 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the waterside is a thoracotomy and is not androgenic is not correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the klutz is not categorematic.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the owner-driver is categorematic or it does not suspend or both.; sent7 -> int4: the subjectivist does browse if the fact that it does deflate kern and it is not a controversy is not correct.;
the subjectivist is not a browse.
sent22 -> int5: if the subjectivist is a kind of a squeezer it is not a browse.; sent2 -> int6: if the subjectivist does not suspend it is a kind of a squeezer and is categorematic.; sent9 -> int7: if the subjectivist completes it does not suspend.; sent23 -> int8: the waterside either is complete or deflates kern or both if it is not a kind of a controversy.; sent8 & sent15 -> int9: the nucleolus deflates owner-driver.; sent10 & int9 -> int10: the owner-driver is non-on-the-job thing that spirals cheesecloth.; sent5 & int10 -> int11: that the klutz spirals cheesecloth is not incorrect.; sent21 & int11 -> int12: that the klutz is not calyptrate but it is tropical is not incorrect.; int12 -> int13: there are non-calyptrate and tropical things.; int13 & sent16 -> int14: the waterside is not a controversy.; int8 & int14 -> int15: the waterside completes and/or deflates kern.;
$hypothesis$ = the subjectivist browses. ; $context$ = sent1: if the subjectivist does not complete then the fact that it deflates kern and is a controversy is not correct. sent2: something that does not suspend is both a squeezer and categorematic. sent3: the klutz is not categorematic if the waterside is androgenic. sent4: the subjectivist is complete if the waterside complete. sent5: the klutz spirals cheesecloth if the owner-driver is not on-the-job but it does spirals cheesecloth. sent6: the fact that if the klutz is not categorematic the owner-driver is categorematic and/or does not suspend hold. sent7: if that something does deflate kern but it is not a controversy does not hold then it is a browse. sent8: there is something such that that it is a private and it does not deflate owner-driver is wrong. sent9: something does not suspend if it does complete. sent10: the owner-driver is not on-the-job but it spirals cheesecloth if the nucleolus deflates owner-driver. sent11: the waterside does not browse if the fact that the subjectivist is androgenic but it is not a thoracotomy is false. sent12: the subjectivist is a controversy and/or it is androgenic if the waterside is not a controversy. sent13: if the subjectivist is not complete that it does deflate kern and is not a controversy is wrong. sent14: that the subjectivist is a controversy and it is categorematic does not hold. sent15: the nucleolus does deflate owner-driver if there is something such that the fact that it is a kind of a private and it does not deflate owner-driver is incorrect. sent16: the waterside is not a controversy if something is non-calyptrate thing that is tropical. sent17: the subjectivist is not complete if the owner-driver does not suspend. sent18: the klutz is not categorematic if that the waterside is a kind of a thoracotomy and is not androgenic is wrong. sent19: that the waterside is a thoracotomy and it is androgenic is not right if it is a kind of a squeezer. sent20: the waterside is a squeezer. sent21: if the klutz does spiral cheesecloth then it is not calyptrate and it is tropical. sent22: if something is a squeezer then it is not a browse. sent23: something is complete or it does deflate kern or both if it is not a controversy. sent24: if the waterside is a squeezer the fact that it is a thoracotomy but not androgenic does not hold. sent25: the owner-driver is a browse. ; $proof$ = 
sent24 & sent20 -> int1: the fact that the waterside is a thoracotomy and is not androgenic is not correct.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: the klutz is not categorematic.; int2 & sent6 -> int3: the owner-driver is categorematic or it does not suspend or both.; sent7 -> int4: the subjectivist does browse if the fact that it does deflate kern and it is not a controversy is not correct.; __UNKNOWN__