the fact that the facility does not occur is correct.
sent1: if the weightlessness occurs and the relacing ichthyologist occurs then the facility does not occur. sent2: the relacing tankard happens. sent3: the biblioticness does not occur. sent4: the justifying Orange does not occur if the catabolicness does not occur. sent5: the weightlessness occurs and the facility happens if the relacing ichthyologist does not occur. sent6: that the yield does not occur and the warm-up does not occur is not right if the weightlessness does not occur. sent7: that both the ordinalness and the non-adaxialness happens is false if the astronauticness does not occur. sent8: the relacing ichthyologist is caused by that the housekeeping crematory does not occur and the housekeeping mugginess does not occur. sent9: that not the prodding gyrus but the justifying tartar occurs causes the justifying phobia. sent10: that the mumbling does not occur results in that the yield does not occur and the warm-up does not occur. sent11: the execration does not occur. sent12: the mumbling does not occur. sent13: that both the asteroidalness and the non-incredulousness occurs prevents that the anastomosing does not occur. sent14: the relacing craniometer does not occur and the regenerateness does not occur. sent15: the justifying ratatouille results in that the housekeeping crematory does not occur and the housekeeping mugginess does not occur. sent16: the impetiginousness and the whoopee occurs. sent17: the grading does not occur and the lymphoidness does not occur. sent18: that the justifying dowdiness and the non-semi-tuberousness occurs leads to that the alkahesticness occurs. sent19: the justifying ratatouille occurs. sent20: the relacing reasoner does not occur if the about-facing does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weightlessness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the yielding does not occur and the warm-up does not occur is not true.; sent10 & sent12 -> int2: the yield does not occur and the warm-up does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the weightlessness occurs.; sent15 & sent19 -> int5: the housekeeping crematory does not occur and the housekeeping mugginess does not occur.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the relacing ichthyologist occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the weightlessness and the relacing ichthyologist occurs.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis;
the facility occurs.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the facility does not occur is correct. ; $context$ = sent1: if the weightlessness occurs and the relacing ichthyologist occurs then the facility does not occur. sent2: the relacing tankard happens. sent3: the biblioticness does not occur. sent4: the justifying Orange does not occur if the catabolicness does not occur. sent5: the weightlessness occurs and the facility happens if the relacing ichthyologist does not occur. sent6: that the yield does not occur and the warm-up does not occur is not right if the weightlessness does not occur. sent7: that both the ordinalness and the non-adaxialness happens is false if the astronauticness does not occur. sent8: the relacing ichthyologist is caused by that the housekeeping crematory does not occur and the housekeeping mugginess does not occur. sent9: that not the prodding gyrus but the justifying tartar occurs causes the justifying phobia. sent10: that the mumbling does not occur results in that the yield does not occur and the warm-up does not occur. sent11: the execration does not occur. sent12: the mumbling does not occur. sent13: that both the asteroidalness and the non-incredulousness occurs prevents that the anastomosing does not occur. sent14: the relacing craniometer does not occur and the regenerateness does not occur. sent15: the justifying ratatouille results in that the housekeeping crematory does not occur and the housekeeping mugginess does not occur. sent16: the impetiginousness and the whoopee occurs. sent17: the grading does not occur and the lymphoidness does not occur. sent18: that the justifying dowdiness and the non-semi-tuberousness occurs leads to that the alkahesticness occurs. sent19: the justifying ratatouille occurs. sent20: the relacing reasoner does not occur if the about-facing does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the weightlessness does not occur.; sent6 & assump1 -> int1: that the yielding does not occur and the warm-up does not occur is not true.; sent10 & sent12 -> int2: the yield does not occur and the warm-up does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the weightlessness occurs.; sent15 & sent19 -> int5: the housekeeping crematory does not occur and the housekeeping mugginess does not occur.; sent8 & int5 -> int6: the relacing ichthyologist occurs.; int4 & int6 -> int7: the weightlessness and the relacing ichthyologist occurs.; int7 & sent1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__