there exists something such that it is a kind of a quinsy and is a rosefish.
sent1: that the infructescence does not cloy morbidity and it is not a quoit is false. sent2: the rennin is a buoyancy. sent3: if something that slenderizes does not cloy dating then the pectin is a brand-newness. sent4: the rennin does depose Leuciscus if the tetrasaccharide is a kind of a rosefish. sent5: the floatplane is a rosefish. sent6: if that the rennin is not an intangible and it is not a quinsy is not right it is not non-substantive. sent7: the relative does cloy morbidity. sent8: the rennin is not non-ametabolic. sent9: the tetrasaccharide is a rosefish if the pectin is a kind of a brand-newness. sent10: the rennin is a kind of a rosefish. sent11: the bondholder is precise if the fact that it is not a rosefish and it is not a cornu does not hold. sent12: if that the rennin is not a kind of a ixodid and is not a Cercidium is wrong it is a rosefish. sent13: the fact that the rennin does cloy morbidity but it does not stink is not correct. sent14: the fact that the rennin is not tame and it does not depose whiting is wrong. sent15: if the rennin cloys morbidity then the fact that it is a quinsy is not wrong. sent16: the rennin is a quoit if the department is a quinsy but it is not a nod. sent17: the fact that the fact that the rennin does not cloy morbidity and does not stink is not true is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the fact that the cellarage does not approbate atmometer and does not cloy morbidity is true is not true. sent19: the backbone slenderizes and does not cloy dating. sent20: the fact that something is a quinsy is not false. sent21: there is something such that it is a rosefish. sent22: the rennin is a quinsy if the fact that it does not cloy morbidity and does not stink does not hold.
sent22 & sent17 -> int1: the rennin is a quinsy.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the rennin is a quinsy and is a rosefish.; int2 -> hypothesis;
there is something such that it does depose Leuciscus and is a quoit.
sent19 -> int3: something slenderizes but it does not cloy dating.; int3 & sent3 -> int4: that the pectin is a brand-newness is not wrong.; sent9 & int4 -> int5: the tetrasaccharide is a rosefish.; sent4 & int5 -> int6: the rennin does depose Leuciscus.;
$hypothesis$ = there exists something such that it is a kind of a quinsy and is a rosefish. ; $context$ = sent1: that the infructescence does not cloy morbidity and it is not a quoit is false. sent2: the rennin is a buoyancy. sent3: if something that slenderizes does not cloy dating then the pectin is a brand-newness. sent4: the rennin does depose Leuciscus if the tetrasaccharide is a kind of a rosefish. sent5: the floatplane is a rosefish. sent6: if that the rennin is not an intangible and it is not a quinsy is not right it is not non-substantive. sent7: the relative does cloy morbidity. sent8: the rennin is not non-ametabolic. sent9: the tetrasaccharide is a rosefish if the pectin is a kind of a brand-newness. sent10: the rennin is a kind of a rosefish. sent11: the bondholder is precise if the fact that it is not a rosefish and it is not a cornu does not hold. sent12: if that the rennin is not a kind of a ixodid and is not a Cercidium is wrong it is a rosefish. sent13: the fact that the rennin does cloy morbidity but it does not stink is not correct. sent14: the fact that the rennin is not tame and it does not depose whiting is wrong. sent15: if the rennin cloys morbidity then the fact that it is a quinsy is not wrong. sent16: the rennin is a quoit if the department is a quinsy but it is not a nod. sent17: the fact that the fact that the rennin does not cloy morbidity and does not stink is not true is not wrong. sent18: the fact that the fact that the cellarage does not approbate atmometer and does not cloy morbidity is true is not true. sent19: the backbone slenderizes and does not cloy dating. sent20: the fact that something is a quinsy is not false. sent21: there is something such that it is a rosefish. sent22: the rennin is a quinsy if the fact that it does not cloy morbidity and does not stink does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent22 & sent17 -> int1: the rennin is a quinsy.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the rennin is a quinsy and is a rosefish.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__