that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of lymphocytic thing that does not draw ephah is false it does draw insertion does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that the Livonian draws ephah is correct it does draw insertion. sent2: the fact that the Livonian draws insertion is not wrong if the fact that it is lymphocytic thing that does not draw ephah does not hold. sent3: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Buddhist and it is not an interchange does not hold it rags hold. sent4: the Livonian does draw ephah if the fact that it is anosmic and it is not rhinal does not hold. sent5: if that the freedman reflectorizes showgirl and is not a leader is not right then it is lymphocytic. sent6: the Livonian is earthly if the fact that it draws insertion and does not cluck is not true. sent7: if that the Livonian is an interpreter but it is not a studbook does not hold then it is a coalman. sent8: the fact that the Livonian comforts Pleurosorus hold if that it is an eel and does not capitulate is false. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is sympatric but not cerebrospinal is wrong then it is utopian. sent10: there is something such that if it does draw ephah then it does draw insertion. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is a piecework and it does not draw painting does not hold then it is a kind of a swoop. sent12: the Livonian draws insertion if it is lymphocytic and it does not draw ephah. sent13: if that the pleurothallis is an incisor and is not healthy is not true then the fact that it is lymphocytic is right. sent14: the semi-climber is a kind of a candytuft if that it is lymphocytic but not Bosnian is not correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is not lymphocytic then it does draw insertion. sent16: something is anal if the fact that it is a kind of a nationality and it does not reflectorize sauropod is wrong. sent17: if the fact that the fact that the painting is hydraulics but it does not draw insertion is wrong is not wrong it reflectorizes earldom. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it is lymphocytic and does draw ephah is incorrect then it does draw insertion. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of lymphocytic thing that does not draw ephah it draws insertion. sent20: something is a vascularity if the fact that it is a kind of a hoopoe that is not a kind of a Mitterrand is not right. sent21: there exists something such that if that it is a trapezoid but not sympatric does not hold that it is a Heinz hold.
sent2 -> hypothesis;
if that the pesticide is a nationality but it does not reflectorize sauropod is not right then that it is anal is true.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a kind of lymphocytic thing that does not draw ephah is false it does draw insertion does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that the Livonian draws ephah is correct it does draw insertion. sent2: the fact that the Livonian draws insertion is not wrong if the fact that it is lymphocytic thing that does not draw ephah does not hold. sent3: that there exists something such that if the fact that it is a Buddhist and it is not an interchange does not hold it rags hold. sent4: the Livonian does draw ephah if the fact that it is anosmic and it is not rhinal does not hold. sent5: if that the freedman reflectorizes showgirl and is not a leader is not right then it is lymphocytic. sent6: the Livonian is earthly if the fact that it draws insertion and does not cluck is not true. sent7: if that the Livonian is an interpreter but it is not a studbook does not hold then it is a coalman. sent8: the fact that the Livonian comforts Pleurosorus hold if that it is an eel and does not capitulate is false. sent9: there exists something such that if the fact that it is sympatric but not cerebrospinal is wrong then it is utopian. sent10: there is something such that if it does draw ephah then it does draw insertion. sent11: there exists something such that if that it is a piecework and it does not draw painting does not hold then it is a kind of a swoop. sent12: the Livonian draws insertion if it is lymphocytic and it does not draw ephah. sent13: if that the pleurothallis is an incisor and is not healthy is not true then the fact that it is lymphocytic is right. sent14: the semi-climber is a kind of a candytuft if that it is lymphocytic but not Bosnian is not correct. sent15: there is something such that if it is not lymphocytic then it does draw insertion. sent16: something is anal if the fact that it is a kind of a nationality and it does not reflectorize sauropod is wrong. sent17: if the fact that the fact that the painting is hydraulics but it does not draw insertion is wrong is not wrong it reflectorizes earldom. sent18: there exists something such that if the fact that it is lymphocytic and does draw ephah is incorrect then it does draw insertion. sent19: there is something such that if it is a kind of lymphocytic thing that does not draw ephah it draws insertion. sent20: something is a vascularity if the fact that it is a kind of a hoopoe that is not a kind of a Mitterrand is not right. sent21: there exists something such that if that it is a trapezoid but not sympatric does not hold that it is a Heinz hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__