that the affixalness occurs is right.
sent1: that the affixalness happens is prevented by that the fording does not occur and the Tuscan does not occur. sent2: that the fording does not occur is caused by that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur. sent3: if not the relieving but the glomming bur happens then the obligationalness does not occur. sent4: the non-obligationalness leads to that the lambing condensate does not occur and the existentialist does not occur. sent5: the landing occurs if the Tuscan does not occur. sent6: the lambing condensate does not occur. sent7: if the landing and/or the statesmanlikeness happens the obscuring does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the enjoyment does not occur is not wrong the fact that the landing happens hold. sent9: if the fording does not occur then the enjoyment does not occur and/or the Tuscan does not occur. sent10: the fact that the coercion and the postmodernistness happens is false. sent11: the Ugandan does not occur if the non-existentialistness or the tribute or both happens. sent12: if the fact that the tribute occurs and the obligationalness happens is not right the tribute does not occur. sent13: the Ugandanness occurs if the fact that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur is not true. sent14: that the statesmanlikeness occurs causes that the enjoyment but not the landing occurs. sent15: the fact that the tribute and the obligationalness happens is not right if the lambing condensate does not occur. sent16: that the glomming pacing does not occur is true. sent17: if the tribute does not occur then the obscuring happens and the existentialist occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the ford does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the enjoyment does not occur and/or the Tuscanness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 & sent5 -> int3: the landing occurs.; int3 -> int4: the landing occurs and/or the statesmanlikeness occurs.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the obscuring does not occur.; sent15 & sent6 -> int6: that both the tribute and the obligationalness happens is incorrect.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the tribute does not occur is correct.; sent17 & int7 -> int8: the obscuring and the existentialist occurs.; int8 -> int9: the obscuring happens.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fact that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur is wrong.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the Ugandan happens.;
the affixalness does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = that the affixalness occurs is right. ; $context$ = sent1: that the affixalness happens is prevented by that the fording does not occur and the Tuscan does not occur. sent2: that the fording does not occur is caused by that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur. sent3: if not the relieving but the glomming bur happens then the obligationalness does not occur. sent4: the non-obligationalness leads to that the lambing condensate does not occur and the existentialist does not occur. sent5: the landing occurs if the Tuscan does not occur. sent6: the lambing condensate does not occur. sent7: if the landing and/or the statesmanlikeness happens the obscuring does not occur. sent8: if the fact that the enjoyment does not occur is not wrong the fact that the landing happens hold. sent9: if the fording does not occur then the enjoyment does not occur and/or the Tuscan does not occur. sent10: the fact that the coercion and the postmodernistness happens is false. sent11: the Ugandan does not occur if the non-existentialistness or the tribute or both happens. sent12: if the fact that the tribute occurs and the obligationalness happens is not right the tribute does not occur. sent13: the Ugandanness occurs if the fact that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur is not true. sent14: that the statesmanlikeness occurs causes that the enjoyment but not the landing occurs. sent15: the fact that the tribute and the obligationalness happens is not right if the lambing condensate does not occur. sent16: that the glomming pacing does not occur is true. sent17: if the tribute does not occur then the obscuring happens and the existentialist occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the ford does not occur.; int1 & sent9 -> int2: the enjoyment does not occur and/or the Tuscanness does not occur.; int2 & sent8 & sent5 -> int3: the landing occurs.; int3 -> int4: the landing occurs and/or the statesmanlikeness occurs.; int4 & sent7 -> int5: the obscuring does not occur.; sent15 & sent6 -> int6: that both the tribute and the obligationalness happens is incorrect.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the fact that the tribute does not occur is correct.; sent17 & int7 -> int8: the obscuring and the existentialist occurs.; int8 -> int9: the obscuring happens.; int5 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> int11: the fact that the locating does not occur and the defoliating hematology does not occur is wrong.; int11 & sent13 -> int12: the Ugandan happens.; __UNKNOWN__