the porcupine does not revamp.
sent1: the fact that the sable is unmindful but it is not homologous is not correct. sent2: something is both a skyrocket and associative if it is not homologous. sent3: the fact that either the waterproofing does not alternate or it does distinguish or both is incorrect if the winder is a skyrocket. sent4: something is not multiple. sent5: the fact that that something does not revamp and distinguishes is not incorrect is false if it is not homologous. sent6: the porcupine does not revamp if there exists something such that that either it does not alternate or it does distinguish or both does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the sable is unmindful and is not homologous is false then the winder is not homologous.
sent2 -> int1: the winder is a kind of a skyrocket that is associative if it is not homologous.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the winder is not homologous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the winder is a kind of a skyrocket and it is associative.; int3 -> int4: the winder is a skyrocket.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the waterproofing is not alternating or does distinguish or both does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not alternate or it does distinguish or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis;
the porcupine revamps.
sent5 -> int7: if that the waterproofing is not homologous is not wrong then that it does not revamp and distinguishes does not hold.;
$hypothesis$ = the porcupine does not revamp. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the sable is unmindful but it is not homologous is not correct. sent2: something is both a skyrocket and associative if it is not homologous. sent3: the fact that either the waterproofing does not alternate or it does distinguish or both is incorrect if the winder is a skyrocket. sent4: something is not multiple. sent5: the fact that that something does not revamp and distinguishes is not incorrect is false if it is not homologous. sent6: the porcupine does not revamp if there exists something such that that either it does not alternate or it does distinguish or both does not hold. sent7: if the fact that the sable is unmindful and is not homologous is false then the winder is not homologous. ; $proof$ = 
sent2 -> int1: the winder is a kind of a skyrocket that is associative if it is not homologous.; sent7 & sent1 -> int2: the winder is not homologous.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the winder is a kind of a skyrocket and it is associative.; int3 -> int4: the winder is a skyrocket.; int4 & sent3 -> int5: that the waterproofing is not alternating or does distinguish or both does not hold.; int5 -> int6: there exists something such that the fact that it does not alternate or it does distinguish or both is incorrect.; int6 & sent6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__