the five-hitter happens.
sent1: if that the hymning Rankin does not occur and the triangulation does not occur does not hold the hymning Arabist does not occur. sent2: the client-serverness occurs. sent3: the triangulation does not occur if the retirement and/or the hymning Arabist occurs. sent4: the affinity happens and the essay occurs. sent5: the hymning Rankin happens. sent6: the client-serverness and the triangulation occurs. sent7: the academicianship occurs and the coalition happens. sent8: that either the sadomasochisticness or the unoriginalness or both occurs is not false. sent9: that the five-hitter does not occur is prevented by that not the retirement but the hymning Rankin occurs. sent10: the rational and the biosyntheticness occurs. sent11: the permissibleness occurs. sent12: the triangulation is prevented by the hymning Arabist.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retirement occurs.; assump1 -> int1: either the retirement occurs or the hymning Arabist happens or both.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the triangulation does not occur.; sent6 -> int3: the triangulation occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the retirement does not occur is right.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: not the retirement but the hymning Rankin occurs.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
the five-hitter does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the five-hitter happens. ; $context$ = sent1: if that the hymning Rankin does not occur and the triangulation does not occur does not hold the hymning Arabist does not occur. sent2: the client-serverness occurs. sent3: the triangulation does not occur if the retirement and/or the hymning Arabist occurs. sent4: the affinity happens and the essay occurs. sent5: the hymning Rankin happens. sent6: the client-serverness and the triangulation occurs. sent7: the academicianship occurs and the coalition happens. sent8: that either the sadomasochisticness or the unoriginalness or both occurs is not false. sent9: that the five-hitter does not occur is prevented by that not the retirement but the hymning Rankin occurs. sent10: the rational and the biosyntheticness occurs. sent11: the permissibleness occurs. sent12: the triangulation is prevented by the hymning Arabist. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the retirement occurs.; assump1 -> int1: either the retirement occurs or the hymning Arabist happens or both.; int1 & sent3 -> int2: the triangulation does not occur.; sent6 -> int3: the triangulation occurs.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the fact that the retirement does not occur is right.; int5 & sent5 -> int6: not the retirement but the hymning Rankin occurs.; int6 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__