the uniforming happens.
sent1: that the slicing regosol happens prevents that the benzenoidness does not occur. sent2: the tradeoff is brought about by that not the IPO but the demotion happens. sent3: that the bidding does not occur but the catalyzing shindig occurs is false. sent4: the exile happens if the fact that not the IPO but the demotion occurs is not right. sent5: the fact that the catalyzing Vigna happens and the instrumenting pyroxylin does not occur is not true. sent6: the tradeoff does not occur if both the warning and the catalyzing virility happens. sent7: the non-beautifulness is prevented by that the darts happens. sent8: that the Iberianness but not the sale occurs triggers that the yearning does not occur. sent9: the warning and the catalyzing virility happens. sent10: if both the inertialness and the catalyzing afropavo happens the expostulating does not occur. sent11: the traceableness happens. sent12: the depredation does not occur. sent13: the signifying happens. sent14: the diving does not occur if the fact that both the diving and the non-xenogeneicness happens does not hold. sent15: the trade happens if the fingerprinting fieldfare does not occur. sent16: the anisogameticness happens. sent17: the investing does not occur. sent18: if both the bombing and the signifying occurs then the intertribalness does not occur. sent19: both the slicing chlorhexidine and the stylishness happens. sent20: the griping does not occur. sent21: the fact that that the adjournment happens and the dive does not occur is true leads to that the uniformedness does not occur. sent22: the fingerprinting Milhaud is prevented by that the quibbling occurs and the innerness happens. sent23: that the non-innerness and the suttee occurs does not hold. sent24: the fact that the dive and the non-xenogeneicness happens is not correct. sent25: the mediating does not occur if the fact that that the mediating but not the uprooting occurs is true does not hold. sent26: if the unmownness does not occur then the substantiating happens. sent27: if that the exile occurs is right the adjournment happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the IPO but the demotion occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the tradeoff occurs.; sent6 & sent9 -> int2: the tradeoff does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the IPO does not occur but the demotion happens is incorrect.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the exile happens.; int5 & sent27 -> int6: the adjournment occurs.; sent14 & sent24 -> int7: the diving does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the adjournment occurs and the diving does not occur.; int8 & sent21 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the uniforming happens. ; $context$ = sent1: that the slicing regosol happens prevents that the benzenoidness does not occur. sent2: the tradeoff is brought about by that not the IPO but the demotion happens. sent3: that the bidding does not occur but the catalyzing shindig occurs is false. sent4: the exile happens if the fact that not the IPO but the demotion occurs is not right. sent5: the fact that the catalyzing Vigna happens and the instrumenting pyroxylin does not occur is not true. sent6: the tradeoff does not occur if both the warning and the catalyzing virility happens. sent7: the non-beautifulness is prevented by that the darts happens. sent8: that the Iberianness but not the sale occurs triggers that the yearning does not occur. sent9: the warning and the catalyzing virility happens. sent10: if both the inertialness and the catalyzing afropavo happens the expostulating does not occur. sent11: the traceableness happens. sent12: the depredation does not occur. sent13: the signifying happens. sent14: the diving does not occur if the fact that both the diving and the non-xenogeneicness happens does not hold. sent15: the trade happens if the fingerprinting fieldfare does not occur. sent16: the anisogameticness happens. sent17: the investing does not occur. sent18: if both the bombing and the signifying occurs then the intertribalness does not occur. sent19: both the slicing chlorhexidine and the stylishness happens. sent20: the griping does not occur. sent21: the fact that that the adjournment happens and the dive does not occur is true leads to that the uniformedness does not occur. sent22: the fingerprinting Milhaud is prevented by that the quibbling occurs and the innerness happens. sent23: that the non-innerness and the suttee occurs does not hold. sent24: the fact that the dive and the non-xenogeneicness happens is not correct. sent25: the mediating does not occur if the fact that that the mediating but not the uprooting occurs is true does not hold. sent26: if the unmownness does not occur then the substantiating happens. sent27: if that the exile occurs is right the adjournment happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that not the IPO but the demotion occurs.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the tradeoff occurs.; sent6 & sent9 -> int2: the tradeoff does not occur.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: that the IPO does not occur but the demotion happens is incorrect.; int4 & sent4 -> int5: the exile happens.; int5 & sent27 -> int6: the adjournment occurs.; sent14 & sent24 -> int7: the diving does not occur.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the adjournment occurs and the diving does not occur.; int8 & sent21 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__