the fact that the pro-lifer does not erase Cyamus and is non-Aeolian is wrong.
sent1: the fact that the fives does not erase Cyamus but it is Draconian does not hold. sent2: that the maikoa does not sneak but it is Aeolian is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the pro-lifer does erase Cyamus but it does not seethe does not hold. sent4: that the lamb's-quarter does erase Cyamus but it is not a Tuscan is not true. sent5: if the fact that the KP is not a Connolly is right the fact that it edges lymphoma and it is holy is not false. sent6: that the pro-lifer does not forge and it is not a kind of a hope is not right. sent7: if something does not erase massage that it is a canto and it erases underpayment does not hold. sent8: something does not erase Cyamus if that it is a canto and erases underpayment is false. sent9: that the pro-lifer is periodontic thing that does not erase Cyamus is not true. sent10: if that something does edge lymphoma is right the fact that it does erase massage and is not a canto is not correct. sent11: that something is non-ventricular and is not a Roseau does not hold if it does not erase underpayment. sent12: the pro-lifer does not erase massage if it is holy and/or it is not a Connolly. sent13: that the fact that the pro-lifer does not erase Cyamus and is Aeolian is not incorrect does not hold. sent14: the fact that the pro-lifer does erase Cyamus and is not a Aeolian is not true. sent15: the fact that the pro-lifer is both not compassionate and non-Aeolian is wrong. sent16: that the pro-lifer does not erase Cyamus and is not a kind of a Aeolian is false. sent17: that the till does not erase Cyamus and is not a kind of a megatherian is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the pro-lifer does not blackmail mimeograph and does not erase Cyamus does not hold.
sent16 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the KP is a kind of non-ventricular thing that is not a kind of a Roseau is not correct.
sent11 -> int1: the fact that the KP is not ventricular and not a Roseau does not hold if it does not erase underpayment.; sent10 -> int2: if the fact that the KP edges lymphoma is not false that it does erase massage and it is not a canto is not true.;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the pro-lifer does not erase Cyamus and is non-Aeolian is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the fact that the fives does not erase Cyamus but it is Draconian does not hold. sent2: that the maikoa does not sneak but it is Aeolian is incorrect. sent3: the fact that the pro-lifer does erase Cyamus but it does not seethe does not hold. sent4: that the lamb's-quarter does erase Cyamus but it is not a Tuscan is not true. sent5: if the fact that the KP is not a Connolly is right the fact that it edges lymphoma and it is holy is not false. sent6: that the pro-lifer does not forge and it is not a kind of a hope is not right. sent7: if something does not erase massage that it is a canto and it erases underpayment does not hold. sent8: something does not erase Cyamus if that it is a canto and erases underpayment is false. sent9: that the pro-lifer is periodontic thing that does not erase Cyamus is not true. sent10: if that something does edge lymphoma is right the fact that it does erase massage and is not a canto is not correct. sent11: that something is non-ventricular and is not a Roseau does not hold if it does not erase underpayment. sent12: the pro-lifer does not erase massage if it is holy and/or it is not a Connolly. sent13: that the fact that the pro-lifer does not erase Cyamus and is Aeolian is not incorrect does not hold. sent14: the fact that the pro-lifer does erase Cyamus and is not a Aeolian is not true. sent15: the fact that the pro-lifer is both not compassionate and non-Aeolian is wrong. sent16: that the pro-lifer does not erase Cyamus and is not a kind of a Aeolian is false. sent17: that the till does not erase Cyamus and is not a kind of a megatherian is incorrect. sent18: the fact that the pro-lifer does not blackmail mimeograph and does not erase Cyamus does not hold. ; $proof$ = 
sent16 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__