the sermonizing Bahaism happens and the cloistering knowingness does not occur.
sent1: the antipyreticness occurs and the sobering occurs. sent2: the Gandhianness occurs and the stapedectomy happens. sent3: both the cloistering living-room and the sermonizing biltong happens. sent4: that the responsibility occurs and the diamagneticness occurs is not right. sent5: if the Gandhianness and the zoolatry happens then the promotionalness does not occur. sent6: the diving does not occur. sent7: the fact that the sprinting happens and the sermonizing collaboration occurs hold. sent8: that the endermicness does not occur is not incorrect if the dislodgment but not the impulse happens. sent9: the Markovianness does not occur if the sermonizing Bahaism happens but the cloistering knowingness does not occur. sent10: the lexicostatisticsness but not the payoff happens. sent11: the stoking stop does not occur. sent12: the vagileness occurs and the stapedectomy happens. sent13: the fact that the zoologicalness happens but the sermonizing dished does not occur is wrong. sent14: the Markovianness and the artiodactylness occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sermonizing Bahaism happens but the cloistering knowingness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Markovianness does not occur.; sent14 -> int2: the Markovianness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the sermonizing Bahaism happens and the cloistering knowingness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the antipyreticness occurs and the sobering occurs. sent2: the Gandhianness occurs and the stapedectomy happens. sent3: both the cloistering living-room and the sermonizing biltong happens. sent4: that the responsibility occurs and the diamagneticness occurs is not right. sent5: if the Gandhianness and the zoolatry happens then the promotionalness does not occur. sent6: the diving does not occur. sent7: the fact that the sprinting happens and the sermonizing collaboration occurs hold. sent8: that the endermicness does not occur is not incorrect if the dislodgment but not the impulse happens. sent9: the Markovianness does not occur if the sermonizing Bahaism happens but the cloistering knowingness does not occur. sent10: the lexicostatisticsness but not the payoff happens. sent11: the stoking stop does not occur. sent12: the vagileness occurs and the stapedectomy happens. sent13: the fact that the zoologicalness happens but the sermonizing dished does not occur is wrong. sent14: the Markovianness and the artiodactylness occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the sermonizing Bahaism happens but the cloistering knowingness does not occur.; sent9 & assump1 -> int1: the Markovianness does not occur.; sent14 -> int2: the Markovianness happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__