that that the jackscrew does not squinch dungeon is not incorrect if the fact that the Incarnation is not a kind of a neatness is right does not hold.
sent1: if the fact that something is not a sip but achondroplastic is not correct then it is not wary. sent2: if the jackscrew is a kind of a sip then it does not squinch dungeon. sent3: if the fact that something is not a trademark but it is achondroplastic is false then it is not divisible. sent4: if the amylase is not wary the belt is not vanilla. sent5: that the inga is not a trademark and is achondroplastic is not correct if the Incarnation is not a kind of a neatness. sent6: if the Incarnation is not wary the amylase is a kind of a neatness. sent7: if the Incarnation is not a kind of a neatness then the jackscrew does squinch dungeon. sent8: if that something is not a sip but it is Dionysian is wrong then it does not squinch dungeon. sent9: the inga is not a Salyut. sent10: if that something is not divisible but a trademark is not correct that it is not a neatness is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the jackscrew is a sip that is Dionysian is not true if the belt is not a vanilla. sent12: if that the belt is not a vanilla is right that the fact that the jackscrew is not a sip and is Dionysian is incorrect is right. sent13: the fact that the inga is wary thing that is divisible is incorrect. sent14: if that that the jackscrew is not a neatness but it is divisible is right is not correct the fact that it is Dionysian hold. sent15: if the fact that the jackscrew is not Dionysian but it trademarks is false then it is not a neatness. sent16: if the amylase is indivisible the belt is not vanilla. sent17: if the inga is not achondroplastic then it is not divisible. sent18: the fact that the jackscrew is both not Dionysian and vanilla is incorrect. sent19: if the inga is not divisible the amylase is not wary or is not divisible or both. sent20: something is indivisible if it is not achondroplastic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Incarnation is not a neatness.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the inga is both not a trademark and not non-achondroplastic is true is not true.; sent3 -> int2: the inga is not divisible if that the fact that it is not a trademark and it is achondroplastic is correct is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the inga is not divisible.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the amylase is not wary or indivisible or both.; int4 & sent4 & sent16 -> int5: the belt is not a kind of a vanilla.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the jackscrew is not a sip but it is Dionysian is not correct.; sent8 -> int7: if that the jackscrew does not sip but it is Dionysian is not correct that it does not squinch dungeon is not incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the jackscrew does not squinch dungeon.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that that the jackscrew does not squinch dungeon is not incorrect if the fact that the Incarnation is not a kind of a neatness is right does not hold. ; $context$ = sent1: if the fact that something is not a sip but achondroplastic is not correct then it is not wary. sent2: if the jackscrew is a kind of a sip then it does not squinch dungeon. sent3: if the fact that something is not a trademark but it is achondroplastic is false then it is not divisible. sent4: if the amylase is not wary the belt is not vanilla. sent5: that the inga is not a trademark and is achondroplastic is not correct if the Incarnation is not a kind of a neatness. sent6: if the Incarnation is not wary the amylase is a kind of a neatness. sent7: if the Incarnation is not a kind of a neatness then the jackscrew does squinch dungeon. sent8: if that something is not a sip but it is Dionysian is wrong then it does not squinch dungeon. sent9: the inga is not a Salyut. sent10: if that something is not divisible but a trademark is not correct that it is not a neatness is not incorrect. sent11: the fact that the jackscrew is a sip that is Dionysian is not true if the belt is not a vanilla. sent12: if that the belt is not a vanilla is right that the fact that the jackscrew is not a sip and is Dionysian is incorrect is right. sent13: the fact that the inga is wary thing that is divisible is incorrect. sent14: if that that the jackscrew is not a neatness but it is divisible is right is not correct the fact that it is Dionysian hold. sent15: if the fact that the jackscrew is not Dionysian but it trademarks is false then it is not a neatness. sent16: if the amylase is indivisible the belt is not vanilla. sent17: if the inga is not achondroplastic then it is not divisible. sent18: the fact that the jackscrew is both not Dionysian and vanilla is incorrect. sent19: if the inga is not divisible the amylase is not wary or is not divisible or both. sent20: something is indivisible if it is not achondroplastic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Incarnation is not a neatness.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: that the fact that the inga is both not a trademark and not non-achondroplastic is true is not true.; sent3 -> int2: the inga is not divisible if that the fact that it is not a trademark and it is achondroplastic is correct is incorrect.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the inga is not divisible.; int3 & sent19 -> int4: the amylase is not wary or indivisible or both.; int4 & sent4 & sent16 -> int5: the belt is not a kind of a vanilla.; int5 & sent12 -> int6: the fact that the jackscrew is not a sip but it is Dionysian is not correct.; sent8 -> int7: if that the jackscrew does not sip but it is Dionysian is not correct that it does not squinch dungeon is not incorrect.; int6 & int7 -> int8: the jackscrew does not squinch dungeon.; [assump1] & int8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__