the fact that the dolichocephalic is a tripper if the winger is not a trigger and/or is not a level is wrong.
sent1: the dolichocephalic does approach winger. sent2: that that the dolichocephalic is a tripper is not wrong if the winger is not a trigger is true. sent3: the dolichocephalic does level if the winger is not a tripper. sent4: if the winger is not a kind of a level then the dolichocephalic is a tripper. sent5: if the dolichocephalic is not a kind of a trigger then the winger is a level. sent6: if either the winger is not a tripper or it is not a level or both the dolichocephalic triggers. sent7: the winger is a tripper if the dolichocephalic is not a level. sent8: either the dolichocephalic does not level or it is not a tripper or both. sent9: the winger is a tripper if the dolichocephalic does not level and/or it is not a trigger. sent10: the winger is not a level or not a tripper or both. sent11: the dolichocephalic is a level if the winger does not trigger. sent12: the winger either is not a tripper or does not level or both. sent13: if that the winger is not a have is true then that the dolichocephalic does approach Zeeman is true. sent14: the dolichocephalic is not a tripper or it is not a level or both. sent15: the winger is a kind of a tripper if the dolichocephalic does not trigger. sent16: if the winger is not a tripper then the dolichocephalic is a kind of a trigger. sent17: the winger does housekeep bloodwort. sent18: either the winger is not a tripper or it does not trigger or both.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winger is not a trigger and/or it is not a level.; assump1 & sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the dolichocephalic is a tripper.; [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the dolichocephalic is a tripper if the winger is not a trigger and/or is not a level is wrong. ; $context$ = sent1: the dolichocephalic does approach winger. sent2: that that the dolichocephalic is a tripper is not wrong if the winger is not a trigger is true. sent3: the dolichocephalic does level if the winger is not a tripper. sent4: if the winger is not a kind of a level then the dolichocephalic is a tripper. sent5: if the dolichocephalic is not a kind of a trigger then the winger is a level. sent6: if either the winger is not a tripper or it is not a level or both the dolichocephalic triggers. sent7: the winger is a tripper if the dolichocephalic is not a level. sent8: either the dolichocephalic does not level or it is not a tripper or both. sent9: the winger is a tripper if the dolichocephalic does not level and/or it is not a trigger. sent10: the winger is not a level or not a tripper or both. sent11: the dolichocephalic is a level if the winger does not trigger. sent12: the winger either is not a tripper or does not level or both. sent13: if that the winger is not a have is true then that the dolichocephalic does approach Zeeman is true. sent14: the dolichocephalic is not a tripper or it is not a level or both. sent15: the winger is a kind of a tripper if the dolichocephalic does not trigger. sent16: if the winger is not a tripper then the dolichocephalic is a kind of a trigger. sent17: the winger does housekeep bloodwort. sent18: either the winger is not a tripper or it does not trigger or both. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the winger is not a trigger and/or it is not a level.; assump1 & sent2 & sent4 -> int1: the dolichocephalic is a tripper.; [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__