the braiding how-do-you-do but not the avuncularness happens.
sent1: the braiding Mennonite happens if the braiding layman happens. sent2: the baptismalness happens. sent3: the spank but not the culdoscopy occurs. sent4: the unneuroticness happens. sent5: if the approximation does not occur then that not the declarativeness but the bicapsularness occurs does not hold. sent6: if the mammography occurs then the itching happens. sent7: that the morphophonemicsness and the itching occurs prevents that the avuncularness happens. sent8: the braiding stead occurs. sent9: the braiding how-do-you-do occurs. sent10: the exoneration does not occur if that the Ecuadorianness does not occur and the breakfasting roundhead occurs is not true. sent11: if the braiding stead does not occur the fact that not the braiding revenant but the fattiness occurs is not true. sent12: the stakeout happens if the burglariousness occurs. sent13: the biology and the communication happens. sent14: the limnologicalness but not the amercing bailment happens. sent15: if the braiding stead does not occur that not the accepting Koran but the groundwork occurs is not right. sent16: if the organizationalness happens the duralness occurs. sent17: the exoneration occurs. sent18: the aeromechanicness does not occur. sent19: that the Ecuadorian happens and the breakfasting roundhead happens does not hold. sent20: if that the unneuroticness does not occur and the fattiness occurs does not hold the accepting Caelum does not occur. sent21: the mammography happens. sent22: the waterspout occurs. sent23: that the mumble does not occur and the accepting amplitude happens does not hold. sent24: if the accepting Phoenicurus does not occur then that the non-Ecuadorianness and the breakfasting roundhead occurs is not true. sent25: if the nonresidentialness occurs then the exuvialness happens. sent26: if the accepting Phoenicurus does not occur then the fact that the fact that the Ecuadorianness occurs and the breakfasting roundhead happens is not incorrect is wrong. sent27: if the accepting Phoenicurus occurs the morphophonemicsness occurs. sent28: that the Ecuadorianness occurs triggers that the exoneration does not occur.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accepting Phoenicurus does not occur.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Ecuadorian does not occur but the breakfasting roundhead happens is not correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the exoneration does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the accepting Phoenicurus happens.; int4 & sent27 -> int5: the morphophonemicsness occurs.; sent6 & sent21 -> int6: the itching occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the morphophonemicsness and the itch occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the avuncularness does not occur.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis;
that both the braiding how-do-you-do and the non-avuncularness occurs is not right.
 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the braiding how-do-you-do but not the avuncularness happens. ; $context$ = sent1: the braiding Mennonite happens if the braiding layman happens. sent2: the baptismalness happens. sent3: the spank but not the culdoscopy occurs. sent4: the unneuroticness happens. sent5: if the approximation does not occur then that not the declarativeness but the bicapsularness occurs does not hold. sent6: if the mammography occurs then the itching happens. sent7: that the morphophonemicsness and the itching occurs prevents that the avuncularness happens. sent8: the braiding stead occurs. sent9: the braiding how-do-you-do occurs. sent10: the exoneration does not occur if that the Ecuadorianness does not occur and the breakfasting roundhead occurs is not true. sent11: if the braiding stead does not occur the fact that not the braiding revenant but the fattiness occurs is not true. sent12: the stakeout happens if the burglariousness occurs. sent13: the biology and the communication happens. sent14: the limnologicalness but not the amercing bailment happens. sent15: if the braiding stead does not occur that not the accepting Koran but the groundwork occurs is not right. sent16: if the organizationalness happens the duralness occurs. sent17: the exoneration occurs. sent18: the aeromechanicness does not occur. sent19: that the Ecuadorian happens and the breakfasting roundhead happens does not hold. sent20: if that the unneuroticness does not occur and the fattiness occurs does not hold the accepting Caelum does not occur. sent21: the mammography happens. sent22: the waterspout occurs. sent23: that the mumble does not occur and the accepting amplitude happens does not hold. sent24: if the accepting Phoenicurus does not occur then that the non-Ecuadorianness and the breakfasting roundhead occurs is not true. sent25: if the nonresidentialness occurs then the exuvialness happens. sent26: if the accepting Phoenicurus does not occur then the fact that the fact that the Ecuadorianness occurs and the breakfasting roundhead happens is not incorrect is wrong. sent27: if the accepting Phoenicurus occurs the morphophonemicsness occurs. sent28: that the Ecuadorianness occurs triggers that the exoneration does not occur. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the accepting Phoenicurus does not occur.; sent24 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the Ecuadorian does not occur but the breakfasting roundhead happens is not correct.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the exoneration does not occur.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the accepting Phoenicurus happens.; int4 & sent27 -> int5: the morphophonemicsness occurs.; sent6 & sent21 -> int6: the itching occurs.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the morphophonemicsness and the itch occurs.; int7 & sent7 -> int8: the avuncularness does not occur.; int8 & sent9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__