the babysitter pearls and it is a paleoethnography.
sent1: that the Pyrethrum is non-alkylic thing that does not harden Ascaridae is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the Pyrethrum is a kind of non-alkylic thing that does not harden Ascaridae is wrong then the D does not harden Ascaridae. sent3: the fact that the fact that something is a pearl and it is a paleoethnography is correct is not true if it is not a tonic. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-tonic thing that is Jovian does not hold the D does harden Ascaridae. sent5: that the Pyrethrum is a kind of a paleoethnography and it hardens saucepot is not incorrect. sent6: something does harden Ascaridae and is not non-alkylic if the fact that it does not pearl is correct.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the babysitter is not a tonic and is Jovian is false.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a tonic and it is Jovian is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the D hardens Ascaridae.; sent2 & sent1 -> int3: the D does not harden Ascaridae.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the babysitter is both not tonic and Jovian.; int5 -> int6: that the babysitter is non-tonic is correct.; sent3 -> int7: the fact that that the babysitter does pearl and is the paleoethnography is not correct if the babysitter is not a tonic is true.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis;
the fact that the fact that the Leo is non-alkylic and does include herrerasaur does not hold is correct.
sent6 -> int8: if the D does not pearl it hardens Ascaridae and it is alkylic.; sent5 -> int9: there exists something such that it is a kind of a paleoethnography that does harden saucepot.;
$hypothesis$ = the babysitter pearls and it is a paleoethnography. ; $context$ = sent1: that the Pyrethrum is non-alkylic thing that does not harden Ascaridae is wrong. sent2: if the fact that the Pyrethrum is a kind of non-alkylic thing that does not harden Ascaridae is wrong then the D does not harden Ascaridae. sent3: the fact that the fact that something is a pearl and it is a paleoethnography is correct is not true if it is not a tonic. sent4: if there exists something such that the fact that it is non-tonic thing that is Jovian does not hold the D does harden Ascaridae. sent5: that the Pyrethrum is a kind of a paleoethnography and it hardens saucepot is not incorrect. sent6: something does harden Ascaridae and is not non-alkylic if the fact that it does not pearl is correct. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that the babysitter is not a tonic and is Jovian is false.; assump1 -> int1: there is something such that that it is not a tonic and it is Jovian is not right.; int1 & sent4 -> int2: the D hardens Ascaridae.; sent2 & sent1 -> int3: the D does not harden Ascaridae.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> int5: the babysitter is both not tonic and Jovian.; int5 -> int6: that the babysitter is non-tonic is correct.; sent3 -> int7: the fact that that the babysitter does pearl and is the paleoethnography is not correct if the babysitter is not a tonic is true.; int6 & int7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__