the Fang does not carol lozenge or is not a Levantine or both.
sent1: the sharkskin is not Levantine. sent2: the fact that something is international but not endomorphic is correct if it is binary. sent3: that that something is a Orpington but it does not skim hold is wrong if it is not a Boswell. sent4: something that is not non-Linnaean is a kind of aneurysmal thing that is not a orthoscope. sent5: the Fang carols lozenge and it is tuneless. sent6: the sharkskin carols lozenge. sent7: if that the Fang is a Orpington and does not skim is incorrect then the sharkskin is a skim. sent8: if the imprint is not tuneless and it does not skim the sharkskin is Linnaean. sent9: the Fang is a kind of a Orpington. sent10: the Fang is not a kind of a monandry. sent11: if something is not occlusive then the fact that either it does not carol lozenge or it is not a Levantine or both does not hold. sent12: the Fang is not Linnaean. sent13: if the mosquito is not holozoic the fact that the sharkskin is both aneurysmal and not a orthoscope is not correct. sent14: if something is aneurysmal then it is a skim and it is not a Boswell. sent15: the roadblock is Levantine. sent16: the sharkskin is aneurysmal if it is not holozoic. sent17: the mosquito is not holozoic if the Fang is both a Boswell and occlusive. sent18: the mosquito is not a Orpington and it is not aphaeretic. sent19: the mosquito carols lozenge. sent20: the Fang is a Boswell if it is a Orpington. sent21: that the abdominal is holozoic is not false. sent22: the Fang is not tuneless if the sharkskin is a kind of a orthoscope that is a Levantine. sent23: the imprint is not tuneless. sent24: if the mosquito is a Boswell then it does lurch felt. sent25: the lozenge is not non-Levantine. sent26: if that something is not a Casper hold it does nestle. sent27: if the sharkskin is a Levantine then it is a orthoscope and it is not a Boswell. sent28: the imprint is not tuneless and is not a skim.
sent20 & sent9 -> int1: the Fang is a Boswell.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Fang is occlusive.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Fang is both a Boswell and not non-occlusive.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the mosquito is not holozoic.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the sharkskin is aneurysmal but it is not a kind of a orthoscope is wrong.; sent4 -> int5: if the sharkskin is Linnaean then it is aneurysmal but not a orthoscope.; sent8 & sent28 -> int6: that the sharkskin is Linnaean is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sharkskin is aneurysmal and is not a orthoscope.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the Fang is not occlusive is right.; sent11 -> int10: if the Fang is not occlusive that it does not carol lozenge and/or is not a kind of a Levantine is wrong.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis;
the sharkskin is a skim.
sent3 -> int11: if the Fang is not a Boswell the fact that it is both a Orpington and not a skim is wrong.;
$hypothesis$ = the Fang does not carol lozenge or is not a Levantine or both. ; $context$ = sent1: the sharkskin is not Levantine. sent2: the fact that something is international but not endomorphic is correct if it is binary. sent3: that that something is a Orpington but it does not skim hold is wrong if it is not a Boswell. sent4: something that is not non-Linnaean is a kind of aneurysmal thing that is not a orthoscope. sent5: the Fang carols lozenge and it is tuneless. sent6: the sharkskin carols lozenge. sent7: if that the Fang is a Orpington and does not skim is incorrect then the sharkskin is a skim. sent8: if the imprint is not tuneless and it does not skim the sharkskin is Linnaean. sent9: the Fang is a kind of a Orpington. sent10: the Fang is not a kind of a monandry. sent11: if something is not occlusive then the fact that either it does not carol lozenge or it is not a Levantine or both does not hold. sent12: the Fang is not Linnaean. sent13: if the mosquito is not holozoic the fact that the sharkskin is both aneurysmal and not a orthoscope is not correct. sent14: if something is aneurysmal then it is a skim and it is not a Boswell. sent15: the roadblock is Levantine. sent16: the sharkskin is aneurysmal if it is not holozoic. sent17: the mosquito is not holozoic if the Fang is both a Boswell and occlusive. sent18: the mosquito is not a Orpington and it is not aphaeretic. sent19: the mosquito carols lozenge. sent20: the Fang is a Boswell if it is a Orpington. sent21: that the abdominal is holozoic is not false. sent22: the Fang is not tuneless if the sharkskin is a kind of a orthoscope that is a Levantine. sent23: the imprint is not tuneless. sent24: if the mosquito is a Boswell then it does lurch felt. sent25: the lozenge is not non-Levantine. sent26: if that something is not a Casper hold it does nestle. sent27: if the sharkskin is a Levantine then it is a orthoscope and it is not a Boswell. sent28: the imprint is not tuneless and is not a skim. ; $proof$ = 
sent20 & sent9 -> int1: the Fang is a Boswell.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that the Fang is occlusive.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: the Fang is both a Boswell and not non-occlusive.; int2 & sent17 -> int3: the mosquito is not holozoic.; int3 & sent13 -> int4: the fact that the sharkskin is aneurysmal but it is not a kind of a orthoscope is wrong.; sent4 -> int5: if the sharkskin is Linnaean then it is aneurysmal but not a orthoscope.; sent8 & sent28 -> int6: that the sharkskin is Linnaean is right.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the sharkskin is aneurysmal and is not a orthoscope.; int4 & int7 -> int8: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int8 -> int9: that the Fang is not occlusive is right.; sent11 -> int10: if the Fang is not occlusive that it does not carol lozenge and/or is not a kind of a Levantine is wrong.; int9 & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__