that the fact that the Cairene does weed rheumatic and does not better faintheartedness is not correct is not false.
sent1: the Cairene is a foul but it does not better faintheartedness. sent2: if the androecium is occipital then that the treponema is a kind of electromagnetic thing that is not a kind of a foul does not hold. sent3: the Cairene is electromagnetic and does not better faintheartedness. sent4: the treponema is electromagnetic but it does not foul. sent5: the androecium does not better faintheartedness. sent6: if the factotum is an aura but it does not better anagram then it is not a chambermaid. sent7: the factotum fouls. sent8: if the factotum corners androecium the androecium is occipital. sent9: that the Cairene is a kind of an aura that corners androecium is incorrect if the factotum does better faintheartedness. sent10: if that the treponema does better faintheartedness is true the Cairene fouls. sent11: something is an aura and does not better anagram if it does not corner androecium. sent12: the treponema weeds rheumatic and is not a kind of a foul if the fact that the Cairene is not electromagnetic hold. sent13: the Cairene weeds rheumatic and does not better faintheartedness if the factotum is not a chambermaid. sent14: if something is not occipital it is not electromagnetic.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the factotum does corner androecium.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the androecium is occipital.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the treponema is electromagnetic and is not a kind of a foul is not right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the factotum does not corner androecium.; sent11 -> int5: that the factotum is a kind of an aura and does not better anagram is correct if it does not corner androecium.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the factotum is a kind of an aura but it does not better anagram.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the factotum is not a chambermaid.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = that the fact that the Cairene does weed rheumatic and does not better faintheartedness is not correct is not false. ; $context$ = sent1: the Cairene is a foul but it does not better faintheartedness. sent2: if the androecium is occipital then that the treponema is a kind of electromagnetic thing that is not a kind of a foul does not hold. sent3: the Cairene is electromagnetic and does not better faintheartedness. sent4: the treponema is electromagnetic but it does not foul. sent5: the androecium does not better faintheartedness. sent6: if the factotum is an aura but it does not better anagram then it is not a chambermaid. sent7: the factotum fouls. sent8: if the factotum corners androecium the androecium is occipital. sent9: that the Cairene is a kind of an aura that corners androecium is incorrect if the factotum does better faintheartedness. sent10: if that the treponema does better faintheartedness is true the Cairene fouls. sent11: something is an aura and does not better anagram if it does not corner androecium. sent12: the treponema weeds rheumatic and is not a kind of a foul if the fact that the Cairene is not electromagnetic hold. sent13: the Cairene weeds rheumatic and does not better faintheartedness if the factotum is not a chambermaid. sent14: if something is not occipital it is not electromagnetic. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the factotum does corner androecium.; sent8 & assump1 -> int1: the androecium is occipital.; int1 & sent2 -> int2: the fact that the treponema is electromagnetic and is not a kind of a foul is not right.; int2 & sent4 -> int3: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> int4: the factotum does not corner androecium.; sent11 -> int5: that the factotum is a kind of an aura and does not better anagram is correct if it does not corner androecium.; int4 & int5 -> int6: the factotum is a kind of an aura but it does not better anagram.; int6 & sent6 -> int7: the factotum is not a chambermaid.; int7 & sent13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__