the catamountain does not astringe colors.
sent1: the chatterer identifies amazon if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-field-crop thing that does not identifies amazon is not right. sent2: if the catamountain is not field-crop but it does scrape it is not sociolinguistics. sent3: the catamountain is toeless if it is field-crop. sent4: something does not relax and it is not conquerable if it identifies amazon. sent5: the raffia is conquerable if it is a forepaw. sent6: something is field-crop if that it is both not piratical and not corrupted is false. sent7: the catamountain does not identify amazon if the raffia does not relax but it is conquerable. sent8: the fact that the catamountain is not assertive does not hold. sent9: the catamountain does not scrape if the raffia is not piratical but it is conquerable. sent10: that the raffia is not field-crop and it does not identify amazon does not hold if the Miwok is piratical. sent11: the raffia is piratical if that it is a kind of a forepaw hold. sent12: the milling is not generous and not a scraping. sent13: the raffia is not a kind of a scraping and it is not sociolinguistics. sent14: if the raffia is not a scraping and is not sociolinguistics it does not relax. sent15: the Miwok is piratical and astringes colors if the capitate is not a forepaw. sent16: the catamountain is a kind of a scraping. sent17: everything does not corrupt. sent18: if the catamountain is field-crop it astringes colors. sent19: the fact that the raffia is not field-crop but it does scrape does not hold if it does not relax. sent20: if the raffia does relax and it astringes colors then the catamountain does not astringes colors. sent21: if the catamountain corrupts then it is not non-field-crop. sent22: if there is something such that it is not corrupted and/or it does not identify fever then the chatterer does not identify fever. sent23: the capitate does mismanage and it is a adsorbent. sent24: the capitate is not a forepaw if that it is a adsorbent hold. sent25: if the fact that the catamountain does not identify amazon is true the fact that it is both not piratical and not corrupted does not hold. sent26: the raffia is a kind of a forepaw.
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: that the raffia does not relax is not false.; sent5 & sent26 -> int2: the raffia is conquerable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the raffia does not relax and is conquerable is not incorrect.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the catamountain does not identify amazon.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the fact that the catamountain is not piratical and it does not corrupt is false.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that the catamountain is field-crop is right if the fact that it is not piratical and does not corrupt is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the catamountain is not non-field-crop.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis;
the chatterer does not identify fever and it does not relax.
sent23 -> int8: the capitate is a adsorbent.; sent24 & int8 -> int9: the capitate is not a forepaw.; int9 & sent15 -> int10: the Miwok is piratical thing that astringes colors.; int10 -> int11: the Miwok is piratical.; sent10 & int11 -> int12: the fact that the raffia is a kind of non-field-crop thing that does not identify amazon is false.; int12 -> int13: there exists something such that the fact that it is not field-crop and does not identify amazon is not true.; sent1 & int13 -> int14: the chatterer identifies amazon.; sent4 -> int15: if the fact that the chatterer identifies amazon hold it does not relax and is not conquerable.; int14 & int15 -> int16: the chatterer does not relax and is not conquerable.; int16 -> int17: the chatterer does not relax.; sent17 -> int18: the sicklepod does not corrupt.; int18 -> int19: the sicklepod either does not corrupt or does not identify fever or both.; int19 -> int20: that either everything does not corrupt or it does not identify fever or both is not incorrect.; int20 -> int21: the catamountain does not corrupt or does not identify fever or both.; int21 -> int22: there is something such that it does not corrupt and/or does not identify fever.; int22 & sent22 -> int23: the chatterer does not identify fever.; int17 & int23 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the catamountain does not astringe colors. ; $context$ = sent1: the chatterer identifies amazon if there exists something such that that it is a kind of non-field-crop thing that does not identifies amazon is not right. sent2: if the catamountain is not field-crop but it does scrape it is not sociolinguistics. sent3: the catamountain is toeless if it is field-crop. sent4: something does not relax and it is not conquerable if it identifies amazon. sent5: the raffia is conquerable if it is a forepaw. sent6: something is field-crop if that it is both not piratical and not corrupted is false. sent7: the catamountain does not identify amazon if the raffia does not relax but it is conquerable. sent8: the fact that the catamountain is not assertive does not hold. sent9: the catamountain does not scrape if the raffia is not piratical but it is conquerable. sent10: that the raffia is not field-crop and it does not identify amazon does not hold if the Miwok is piratical. sent11: the raffia is piratical if that it is a kind of a forepaw hold. sent12: the milling is not generous and not a scraping. sent13: the raffia is not a kind of a scraping and it is not sociolinguistics. sent14: if the raffia is not a scraping and is not sociolinguistics it does not relax. sent15: the Miwok is piratical and astringes colors if the capitate is not a forepaw. sent16: the catamountain is a kind of a scraping. sent17: everything does not corrupt. sent18: if the catamountain is field-crop it astringes colors. sent19: the fact that the raffia is not field-crop but it does scrape does not hold if it does not relax. sent20: if the raffia does relax and it astringes colors then the catamountain does not astringes colors. sent21: if the catamountain corrupts then it is not non-field-crop. sent22: if there is something such that it is not corrupted and/or it does not identify fever then the chatterer does not identify fever. sent23: the capitate does mismanage and it is a adsorbent. sent24: the capitate is not a forepaw if that it is a adsorbent hold. sent25: if the fact that the catamountain does not identify amazon is true the fact that it is both not piratical and not corrupted does not hold. sent26: the raffia is a kind of a forepaw. ; $proof$ = 
sent14 & sent13 -> int1: that the raffia does not relax is not false.; sent5 & sent26 -> int2: the raffia is conquerable.; int1 & int2 -> int3: the fact that the raffia does not relax and is conquerable is not incorrect.; int3 & sent7 -> int4: the catamountain does not identify amazon.; int4 & sent25 -> int5: the fact that the catamountain is not piratical and it does not corrupt is false.; sent6 -> int6: the fact that the catamountain is field-crop is right if the fact that it is not piratical and does not corrupt is incorrect.; int5 & int6 -> int7: the catamountain is not non-field-crop.; int7 & sent18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__