the fact that the integrating scholium occurs is right.
sent1: the mystifying rape happens. sent2: the noncombinativeness and/or that the mystifying minesweeper does not occur prevents the noncombinative. sent3: the overburdening biteplate does not occur if that the overburdening biteplate happens but the prawning does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the prawning does not occur and the mystifying rape does not occur is incorrect if the combinativeness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the overburdening biteplate but not the prawning occurs is incorrect if the mystifying rape does not occur. sent6: the prawn happens. sent7: if that the combinativeness happens and/or the cyclone happens is incorrect then the fact that the integrating scholium does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the angiospermousness occurs. sent9: the icosahedralness but not the benching occurs. sent10: if the fact that the mystifying rape does not occur is not wrong the integrating scholium occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mystifying rape happens and the prawn does not occur hold.; assump1 -> int1: the prawn does not occur.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the mystifying rape happens but the prawning does not occur is not right.;
the integrating scholium does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the fact that the integrating scholium occurs is right. ; $context$ = sent1: the mystifying rape happens. sent2: the noncombinativeness and/or that the mystifying minesweeper does not occur prevents the noncombinative. sent3: the overburdening biteplate does not occur if that the overburdening biteplate happens but the prawning does not occur is wrong. sent4: the fact that the prawning does not occur and the mystifying rape does not occur is incorrect if the combinativeness does not occur. sent5: the fact that the overburdening biteplate but not the prawning occurs is incorrect if the mystifying rape does not occur. sent6: the prawn happens. sent7: if that the combinativeness happens and/or the cyclone happens is incorrect then the fact that the integrating scholium does not occur is not wrong. sent8: the angiospermousness occurs. sent9: the icosahedralness but not the benching occurs. sent10: if the fact that the mystifying rape does not occur is not wrong the integrating scholium occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that that the mystifying rape happens and the prawn does not occur hold.; assump1 -> int1: the prawn does not occur.; sent6 & int1 -> int2: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: that the mystifying rape happens but the prawning does not occur is not right.; __UNKNOWN__