the chlorofucin is a kind of a Pizarro that is a deoxyadenosine.
sent1: if something does besiege phospholipid but it is not a kind of a catechism then it does not moor Cajun. sent2: something is a transgression. sent3: the fatalist is not non-allergenic if the nautilus is a transgression. sent4: if something is not an enticement then that it does not moor execration and it does not prop Centrocercus does not hold. sent5: the faience is not photoemissive if the fact that it is not bacteriostatic and it is a kind of a Nepalese is incorrect. sent6: if there is something such that it is a kind of a transgression the chlorofucin is allergenic. sent7: if something does moor Cajun that the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and is not a kind of a catechism is not wrong. sent8: the chlorofucin is a wastage if it is both not a transgression and not a defile. sent9: if the fatalist is allergenic then the chlorofucin besieges phospholipid and is not a catechism. sent10: something does not bowl tachometer if the fact that it does not moor execration and it does not prop Centrocercus is not correct. sent11: the fact that the faience is not bacteriostatic but it is a kind of a Nepalese is not correct if the copepod does adhere. sent12: something does moor Cajun. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a transgression the chlorofucin is allergenic a deoxyadenosine. sent14: the rhodonite is a kind of an anatomical. sent15: if the stephanion does not bowl tachometer the nautilus is a transgression. sent16: the copepod adheres if the rhodonite is a kind of an anatomical. sent17: if something that does not moor copepod does not prop Cistus it is a catechism. sent18: if the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and is a catechism then it is a Pizarro. sent19: if the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and it is not a catechism then it is a Pizarro. sent20: if something does not moor Cajun then the fact that it is a Pizarro that is a deoxyadenosine is incorrect.
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and it is not a kind of a catechism.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the chlorofucin is a Pizarro.; sent2 & sent13 -> int3: the chlorofucin is allergenic and it is a deoxyadenosine.; int3 -> int4: the chlorofucin is a deoxyadenosine.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;
the brainwave is a catechism if it does not moor copepod and it does not prop Cistus.
sent17 -> hypothesis;
$hypothesis$ = the chlorofucin is a kind of a Pizarro that is a deoxyadenosine. ; $context$ = sent1: if something does besiege phospholipid but it is not a kind of a catechism then it does not moor Cajun. sent2: something is a transgression. sent3: the fatalist is not non-allergenic if the nautilus is a transgression. sent4: if something is not an enticement then that it does not moor execration and it does not prop Centrocercus does not hold. sent5: the faience is not photoemissive if the fact that it is not bacteriostatic and it is a kind of a Nepalese is incorrect. sent6: if there is something such that it is a kind of a transgression the chlorofucin is allergenic. sent7: if something does moor Cajun that the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and is not a kind of a catechism is not wrong. sent8: the chlorofucin is a wastage if it is both not a transgression and not a defile. sent9: if the fatalist is allergenic then the chlorofucin besieges phospholipid and is not a catechism. sent10: something does not bowl tachometer if the fact that it does not moor execration and it does not prop Centrocercus is not correct. sent11: the fact that the faience is not bacteriostatic but it is a kind of a Nepalese is not correct if the copepod does adhere. sent12: something does moor Cajun. sent13: if there exists something such that it is a transgression the chlorofucin is allergenic a deoxyadenosine. sent14: the rhodonite is a kind of an anatomical. sent15: if the stephanion does not bowl tachometer the nautilus is a transgression. sent16: the copepod adheres if the rhodonite is a kind of an anatomical. sent17: if something that does not moor copepod does not prop Cistus it is a catechism. sent18: if the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and is a catechism then it is a Pizarro. sent19: if the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and it is not a catechism then it is a Pizarro. sent20: if something does not moor Cajun then the fact that it is a Pizarro that is a deoxyadenosine is incorrect. ; $proof$ = 
sent12 & sent7 -> int1: the chlorofucin does not besiege phospholipid and it is not a kind of a catechism.; int1 & sent19 -> int2: the chlorofucin is a Pizarro.; sent2 & sent13 -> int3: the chlorofucin is allergenic and it is a deoxyadenosine.; int3 -> int4: the chlorofucin is a deoxyadenosine.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__