the congressionalness does not occur.
sent1: the debilitation occurs. sent2: if the debilitation happens the fact that the polypectomy does not occur but the outshouting canoeist happens is incorrect. sent3: the reformation happens. sent4: that the evening apostrophe does not occur is triggered by that not the bearing wildcatter but the carvel-builtness happens. sent5: the non-normalness and the evening reserve happens if the congressionalness occurs. sent6: not the unnoticeableness but the inscription happens. sent7: the evening Molidae does not occur and the treason occurs. sent8: the uncutness does not occur if the surveillance and the congressionalness occurs. sent9: that the singing does not occur and the evening Blida does not occur yields that the surveillance does not occur. sent10: the bearing cloudberry does not occur if the fact that the garnering happens is not incorrect. sent11: that the fact that the scuffling does not occur does not hold is true. sent12: if that the polypectomy does not occur and the outshouting canoeist happens is not correct the singing does not occur. sent13: the meatlessness and the evening Blida happens if the scuffle does not occur. sent14: the characteristic happens. sent15: that the singing does not occur and the evening Blida does not occur is brought about by that the scuffle occurs. sent16: if the bearing Kachin occurs then the bearing astrogator occurs and the scuffle does not occur. sent17: that the icing does not occur but the circadianness happens triggers the non-subatomicness. sent18: the surveillance is brought about by that both the non-normalness and the evening reserve happens. sent19: the overindulgence occurs.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the congressionalness happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the normalness does not occur and the evening reserve occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that the surveillance happens is correct.; sent15 & sent11 -> int3: the singing does not occur and the evening Blida does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the surveillance does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis;
the uncutness does not occur but the meatlessness occurs.
sent2 & sent1 -> int6: that not the polypectomy but the outshouting canoeist occurs is not right.; sent12 & int6 -> int7: the singing does not occur.;
$hypothesis$ = the congressionalness does not occur. ; $context$ = sent1: the debilitation occurs. sent2: if the debilitation happens the fact that the polypectomy does not occur but the outshouting canoeist happens is incorrect. sent3: the reformation happens. sent4: that the evening apostrophe does not occur is triggered by that not the bearing wildcatter but the carvel-builtness happens. sent5: the non-normalness and the evening reserve happens if the congressionalness occurs. sent6: not the unnoticeableness but the inscription happens. sent7: the evening Molidae does not occur and the treason occurs. sent8: the uncutness does not occur if the surveillance and the congressionalness occurs. sent9: that the singing does not occur and the evening Blida does not occur yields that the surveillance does not occur. sent10: the bearing cloudberry does not occur if the fact that the garnering happens is not incorrect. sent11: that the fact that the scuffling does not occur does not hold is true. sent12: if that the polypectomy does not occur and the outshouting canoeist happens is not correct the singing does not occur. sent13: the meatlessness and the evening Blida happens if the scuffle does not occur. sent14: the characteristic happens. sent15: that the singing does not occur and the evening Blida does not occur is brought about by that the scuffle occurs. sent16: if the bearing Kachin occurs then the bearing astrogator occurs and the scuffle does not occur. sent17: that the icing does not occur but the circadianness happens triggers the non-subatomicness. sent18: the surveillance is brought about by that both the non-normalness and the evening reserve happens. sent19: the overindulgence occurs. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the congressionalness happens.; sent5 & assump1 -> int1: the normalness does not occur and the evening reserve occurs.; int1 & sent18 -> int2: that the surveillance happens is correct.; sent15 & sent11 -> int3: the singing does not occur and the evening Blida does not occur.; sent9 & int3 -> int4: the surveillance does not occur.; int2 & int4 -> int5: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int5 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__