the mutation occurs.
sent1: the slice is prevented by that the extinguishing easter occurs. sent2: the fact that the extinguishing easter does not occur but the tibialness happens is false if the mutation does not occur. sent3: the Neapolitan happens. sent4: that the extinguishing easter occurs and the tibialness occurs is false. sent5: that not the lay-up but the sarcosomalness occurs is wrong if the downmarketness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the extinguishing easter does not occur and the tibialness occurs does not hold then the slice does not occur. sent7: the fact that the droning breadbasket occurs is not wrong. sent8: the facelift does not occur if the fact that both the non-fancyness and the landler happens is not correct. sent9: that the extinguishing easter occurs and the tibialness occurs is not correct if the mutation does not occur. sent10: if the extinguishing benignity does not occur the fact that both the tortiousness and the resuming happens is wrong. sent11: the fact that the porterage does not occur but the fungalness happens is incorrect. sent12: that the parotidness occurs and the champing occurs is wrong. sent13: that if the fact that not the droning Glenn but the nonacceptance happens does not hold the authentication does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the contributing stand does not occur is right. sent15: the slice occurs and the contributing smegma happens. sent16: the achondroplasticness happens and the injustice happens. sent17: the sortition happens. sent18: the contributing smegma happens. sent19: the mutation does not occur if the fact that the slice does not occur and/or the contributing smegma happens is incorrect. sent20: the fact that that the singles does not occur but the sarcosomalness happens does not hold hold.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutation does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the extinguishing easter does not occur but the tibialness occurs is correct is not correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the slice does not occur.; sent15 -> int3: the slicing happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis;
the mutation does not occur.
$hypothesis$ = the mutation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the slice is prevented by that the extinguishing easter occurs. sent2: the fact that the extinguishing easter does not occur but the tibialness happens is false if the mutation does not occur. sent3: the Neapolitan happens. sent4: that the extinguishing easter occurs and the tibialness occurs is false. sent5: that not the lay-up but the sarcosomalness occurs is wrong if the downmarketness does not occur. sent6: if the fact that the extinguishing easter does not occur and the tibialness occurs does not hold then the slice does not occur. sent7: the fact that the droning breadbasket occurs is not wrong. sent8: the facelift does not occur if the fact that both the non-fancyness and the landler happens is not correct. sent9: that the extinguishing easter occurs and the tibialness occurs is not correct if the mutation does not occur. sent10: if the extinguishing benignity does not occur the fact that both the tortiousness and the resuming happens is wrong. sent11: the fact that the porterage does not occur but the fungalness happens is incorrect. sent12: that the parotidness occurs and the champing occurs is wrong. sent13: that if the fact that not the droning Glenn but the nonacceptance happens does not hold the authentication does not occur is not incorrect. sent14: the fact that the contributing stand does not occur is right. sent15: the slice occurs and the contributing smegma happens. sent16: the achondroplasticness happens and the injustice happens. sent17: the sortition happens. sent18: the contributing smegma happens. sent19: the mutation does not occur if the fact that the slice does not occur and/or the contributing smegma happens is incorrect. sent20: the fact that that the singles does not occur but the sarcosomalness happens does not hold hold. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the mutation does not occur.; sent2 & assump1 -> int1: the fact that the fact that the extinguishing easter does not occur but the tibialness occurs is correct is not correct.; int1 & sent6 -> int2: the slice does not occur.; sent15 -> int3: the slicing happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__