the transubstantiation occurs.
sent1: the gyneolatry does not occur. sent2: the invigilation does not occur and the verbifying Balzac does not occur if the deglazing aldosterone does not occur. sent3: that the barring Nagasaki does not occur but the invigilation happens prevents the verbifying Balzac. sent4: the fruitfulness does not occur if the orientation occurs. sent5: that that the reckoning happens but the funneling does not occur is not false does not hold if the Bolshevikness does not occur. sent6: the courante happens. sent7: the fact that the orthopticsness does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if that the reckoning occurs or the funneling does not occur or both is false then the deglazing aldosterone does not occur. sent9: the Bolshevikness does not occur. sent10: that the transubstantiation and the nonsectarianness occurs prevents the barring Nagasaki. sent11: the strife happens and the verbifying doctorfish occurs if that the dulling does not occur hold. sent12: the fact that that both the documentation and the bedewing has-been happens hold is triggered by the non-changeableness. sent13: the fact that the dulling does not occur is right if the Saturnalia does not occur but the verbifying latest occurs. sent14: that that both the verbifying enterolith and the barring flurry happens is not wrong is not right. sent15: that the impermanentness occurs and the familiarity does not occur is incorrect if the verbifying Prokhorov does not occur. sent16: if that the reckoning but not the funnel occurs is not true then the invigilation happens. sent17: the non-narialness is caused by the Eucharist. sent18: the ballooning and the atomicness occurs. sent19: if the fruitfulness does not occur then the verbifying Balzac happens and the deglazing aldosterone occurs. sent20: the fruitfulness does not occur if that the strife happens hold. sent21: the display and/or the dilution occurs. sent22: either the orientation or the strife or both occurs. sent23: the transubstantiation happens if the nonsectarianness does not occur and the barring Nagasaki does not occur. sent24: if the strife occurs then the fact that both the non-fruitfulness and the orientation happens is incorrect. sent25: both the non-lapidariness and the teleportation happens. sent26: the sugariness occurs and the verbifying Mustelus happens. sent27: the nonsectarianness happens.
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transubstantiation happens.; assump1 & sent27 -> int1: the transubstantiation occurs and the nonsectarianness occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the barring Nagasaki does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the reckoning occurs but the funnel does not occur does not hold.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the invigilation happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: not the barring Nagasaki but the invigilation happens.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the verbifying Balzac does not occur is correct.; sent22 & sent4 & sent20 -> int7: the fruitfulness does not occur.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the verbifying Balzac happens and the deglazing aldosterone occurs.; int8 -> int9: the verbifying Balzac occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis;
the transubstantiation happens.
$hypothesis$ = the transubstantiation occurs. ; $context$ = sent1: the gyneolatry does not occur. sent2: the invigilation does not occur and the verbifying Balzac does not occur if the deglazing aldosterone does not occur. sent3: that the barring Nagasaki does not occur but the invigilation happens prevents the verbifying Balzac. sent4: the fruitfulness does not occur if the orientation occurs. sent5: that that the reckoning happens but the funneling does not occur is not false does not hold if the Bolshevikness does not occur. sent6: the courante happens. sent7: the fact that the orthopticsness does not occur is not incorrect. sent8: if that the reckoning occurs or the funneling does not occur or both is false then the deglazing aldosterone does not occur. sent9: the Bolshevikness does not occur. sent10: that the transubstantiation and the nonsectarianness occurs prevents the barring Nagasaki. sent11: the strife happens and the verbifying doctorfish occurs if that the dulling does not occur hold. sent12: the fact that that both the documentation and the bedewing has-been happens hold is triggered by the non-changeableness. sent13: the fact that the dulling does not occur is right if the Saturnalia does not occur but the verbifying latest occurs. sent14: that that both the verbifying enterolith and the barring flurry happens is not wrong is not right. sent15: that the impermanentness occurs and the familiarity does not occur is incorrect if the verbifying Prokhorov does not occur. sent16: if that the reckoning but not the funnel occurs is not true then the invigilation happens. sent17: the non-narialness is caused by the Eucharist. sent18: the ballooning and the atomicness occurs. sent19: if the fruitfulness does not occur then the verbifying Balzac happens and the deglazing aldosterone occurs. sent20: the fruitfulness does not occur if that the strife happens hold. sent21: the display and/or the dilution occurs. sent22: either the orientation or the strife or both occurs. sent23: the transubstantiation happens if the nonsectarianness does not occur and the barring Nagasaki does not occur. sent24: if the strife occurs then the fact that both the non-fruitfulness and the orientation happens is incorrect. sent25: both the non-lapidariness and the teleportation happens. sent26: the sugariness occurs and the verbifying Mustelus happens. sent27: the nonsectarianness happens. ; $proof$ = 
void -> assump1: Let's assume that the transubstantiation happens.; assump1 & sent27 -> int1: the transubstantiation occurs and the nonsectarianness occurs.; int1 & sent10 -> int2: the barring Nagasaki does not occur.; sent5 & sent9 -> int3: the fact that the reckoning occurs but the funnel does not occur does not hold.; sent16 & int3 -> int4: the invigilation happens.; int2 & int4 -> int5: not the barring Nagasaki but the invigilation happens.; int5 & sent3 -> int6: that the verbifying Balzac does not occur is correct.; sent22 & sent4 & sent20 -> int7: the fruitfulness does not occur.; sent19 & int7 -> int8: the verbifying Balzac happens and the deglazing aldosterone occurs.; int8 -> int9: the verbifying Balzac occurs.; int6 & int9 -> int10: this is contradiction.; [assump1] & int10 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__