Differences in analyses can arise between synchronic and diachronic approaches. Hopper and Traugott state that the cline of grammaticalization has both diachronic and synchronic implications. Some recent scholarship questions the practicality of this synchronic/diachronic distinction. It may sometimes be useful to distinguish between diachronic and synchronic museums. The linguist's approach to these can be diachronic or synchronic. It deals with synchronic phonology as well as phonetics. The study became synchronic, concerned with semantic structures and narrowly linguistic structures. Musematic repetition includes circularity, synchronic relations, and openness. Current usage of the term "weak suppletion" in synchronic morphology is not fixed. No systematic synchronic description of Romansh vocabulary has been carried out so far. Therefore, Skinner argues that intellectual historians should focus on the synchronic context of the text. When taking a synchronic perspective on modern languages, however, both processes appear very similar. It is found both in synchronic analysis of languages and diachronics. The Punjabi language is written in multiple scripts (a phenomenon known as synchronic digraphia). This type of analysis is called a synchronic approach.