Scientific theories are testable and make falsifiable predictions. Synchronicity is considered pseudoscience because it is neither testable nor falsifiable. However, synchronicity itself is considered neither testable nor falsifiable. Null hypotheses should be at least falsifiable. Conversely, conflict theory is empirically falsifiable and thus, distinct from Marxism (Cao, 2003). Geoffrey Sampson maintains that universal grammar theories are not falsifiable and are therefore pseudoscientific. Acceptance is dependent upon the falsifiable hypothesis surviving tests. Where astrology has made falsifiable predictions, it has been falsified. For example, Victor Argonov states that epiphenomenalism is a questionable, but experimentally falsifiable theory. Relativity is a falsifiable theory&colon; It makes predictions that can be tested by experiment. Where it has made falsifiable predictions under controlled conditions, they have been falsified. Additionally, commentators have attacked EMDR as pseudoscience, claiming that it is not falsifiable. Unfortunately, the idea of epiphenomena in propositional theory is largely subjective and not falsifiable. In the second sense it is factually true and falsifiable. Hence, human evolution has passed several falsifiable tests.