Normative jurisprudence involves normative, evaluative, and otherwise prescriptive questions about the law. There are various types of norms, including&colon; prescriptive, proscriptive, descriptive, and injunctive. In this context normative ethics is sometimes called prescriptive, rather than descriptive ethics. Normative discrimination stems from descriptive and prescriptive stereotyping. Hence, normative ethics is sometimes called prescriptive, rather than descriptive. Meta-ethical relativism seems to eliminate the normative relativist's ability to make prescriptive claims. Behavioral scientists classify stereotyping into prescriptive and descriptive. A theory can be either "descriptive" as in science, or "prescriptive" (normative) as in philosophy. It is structured in both descriptive and prescriptive methodologies. Vantage provides access to descriptive, predictive and prescriptive analytics to enable autonomous decision making. Due to the methods of existentialism, prescriptive or declarative statements about meaning are unjustified. The development of explanatory claims and prescriptive ideas are necessary. The shastras are both descriptive and prescriptive. It is descriptive (unlike the prescriptive or specific curriculum). Lexicographers apply two basic philosophies to the defining of words&colon; "prescriptive" or "descriptive".