question: In what year did the Austrian case to which the Mongelli case has been compared emerge?
answer: 2008
context: Title: Fritzl case
  Passage: The Fritzl case emerged in April 2008 when a woman named Elisabeth Fritzl (born 6 April 1966) told police in the town of Amstetten, Austria, that she had been held captive for 24 years behind eight locked doors in a concealed corridor part of the basement area of the large family house by her father, Josef Fritzl (born 9 April 1935), and that Fritzl had physically assaulted, sexually abused, and raped her numerous times during her imprisonment.  The abuse by her father resulted in the birth of seven children; three of whom remained in captivity with their mother, one of whom died just days after birth and the other three of whom were brought up by Fritzl and his wife, Rosemarie, having been reported as foundlings.
  Title: Mongelli case
  Passage: Michele Mongelli (born 1945) is a man from Turin, Italy, who was arrested on 27 March 2009 for allegedly sexually abusing his daughter over 25 years.  His son Giuseppe (born 1968) was also arrested on the allegation of abusing his sister and his own four daughters.  Because of the similarities, this case has been compared to the Fritzl case in Austria and the Sheffield incest case in Britain.
  Title: European Case Law Identifier
  Passage: The European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) is an identifier for case law in Europe, implemented by the European Union Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Patent Office and several EU Member States.  The identifier consists of 5 parts separated by colons: ECLI:[country code]:[court identifier]:[year of decision]:"[specific identifier]".  The system contains also a set of uniform metadata to improve search facilities for case law.  The standard is laid down in the Council Conclusions inviting the introduction of the European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) and a minimum set of uniform metadata for case law of the European Union.
  Title: Maharaj Libel Case
  Passage: The Maharaj Libel Case is a famous case that was tried in the Bombay (then just in transition from a Supreme Court to a High Court) Court in 1862.  The case arose when the plaintiff, Jadunathji Brijratanji "Maharaj", a religious leader, filed a case of libel against a reformer and journalist Karsandas Mulji for writing an article in the newspaper titled "The Primitive Religion of the Hindus and the Present Heterodox Opinions".  In this article he questioned the values of a Hindu sect called the Pushtimarg or Vallabhacharya sampradaya and this was claimed to be libelous by the plaintiff.  In particular were accusations that Jadunathji had sexual liaisons with women followers and that men were expected to show their devotion by offering their wives for sex with the religious leaders.  The case was followed with great interest by the press and thousands of the general public attended the case in court.  In the course of the case, the sect's philosophies were examined and compared with other Hindu texts by missionary orientalist scholars like John Wilson.  Doctors, including Bhau Daji, testified to having treated the religious leader for syphilis and several witnesses recounted his erotic escapades.  Max Weber examined the cult and noted that their path to salvation was based on sexual orgies.  The case went in favour of the journalist and Judge Joseph Arnould pronounced that he was only doing his duty as a journalist of exposing the misdeeds of the religious leader.  In his own words - ""a public journalist is a public teacher: the true function of the press, that by virtue of which it has rightly grown to be one of the great powers of the modern world—is the function of teaching, elevating and enlightening those who fall within the range of its influence"."
citations: Fritzl case Mongelli case